DE LEON.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Discussion Does not take into account viruses & protists Correlation coefficients not statistically significantly different but close to significance C. perfringens less closely correlated to pathogens than Bacteroides spp. but more easily detected
Conclusions & Recommendations More analyses to further confirm these results Clostridium perfringens be adopted and used alongside E. coli & enterococci Develop more easy-to-use techniques for Bacteroides Epidemiology study using traditional and proposed indicators Survival rate comparisons: indicators vs pathogens
Page 1 and 2: Adequacy of Microbial Indicators of
Page 3 and 4: Adequacy of Microbial Indicators of
Page 5 and 6: • Pathogens are not detected easi
Page 7 and 8: • present when pathogens are pres
Page 9 and 10: Faecal Indicators Organisms include
Page 11 and 12: iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Page 13 and 14: The Problem
Page 15 and 16: Rationale • Region‟s heavy depe
Page 17 and 18: Objectives • To determine the ade
Page 19 and 20: Methodology
Page 21 and 22: Sampling • Samples collected in a
Page 23 and 24: Dominica
Page 25 and 26: Grenada
Page 27 and 28: Table 1. Standard Methods (2005) fo
Page 29 and 30: Data Compilation
Page 31 and 32: Number of true negatives • SPECIF
Page 33 and 34: Water Quality • Total of 713 mari
Page 35 and 36: Frequency at which the sample count
Page 37 and 38: Correlations between Indicators and
Page 39: Marine Water Fresh Water Sensitivit
Page 43: Percentage true and false positives

DE LEON.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?