27.10.2014 Views

inside - the School of Engineering - The Catholic University of America

inside - the School of Engineering - The Catholic University of America

inside - the School of Engineering - The Catholic University of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hidler Honored with<br />

Inaugural Provost<br />

Award for Research<br />

Citing <strong>the</strong> need<br />

to “recognize <strong>the</strong><br />

accomplishments <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> university’s faculty,<br />

to show appreciation<br />

to <strong>the</strong>m and to give<br />

<strong>the</strong>m some reward for<br />

doing a fantastic job,”<br />

Provost John Convey presented seven<br />

CUA faculty members with newly created<br />

Provost Awards at <strong>the</strong> May 4 faculty<br />

luncheon. Joseph Hidler, Ph.D., associate<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> biomedical engineering,<br />

received a Provost’s Award for Excellence<br />

in Research and Scholarship. Two additional<br />

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> faculty — Lu Sun,<br />

Ph.D., associate pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> civil engineering,<br />

nominated for excellence in research,<br />

and John Judge, Ph.D., assistant pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

<strong>of</strong> mechanical engineering, for excellence<br />

in teaching — were among <strong>the</strong> 31 nominees.<br />

“All <strong>the</strong> nominees were very worthy<br />

and in most cases it was hard to choose<br />

<strong>the</strong> winners,” said Convey.<br />

Hidler’s research interests include <strong>the</strong><br />

study <strong>of</strong> neuromuscular pathologies associated<br />

with stroke and spinal cord injury,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> robotic devices<br />

designed to facilitate motor recovery. He<br />

received <strong>the</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>’s 2003<br />

Charles H. Kaman Award for Excellence<br />

in Teaching, 2005 Charles H. Kaman<br />

Award for Excellence in Research, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>America</strong>n Spinal Injury Association’s<br />

“best presentation” at its 2004 annual<br />

meeting. He serves on <strong>the</strong> Scientific<br />

Advisory Board for <strong>the</strong> Paralyzed Veterans<br />

Association and is an associate editor <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> journal Transactions on Neural Systems<br />

and Rehabilitation <strong>Engineering</strong>. During<br />

2005, Hidler published four articles; four<br />

additional articles are in progress. His work<br />

has attracted more than $4.5 million in<br />

support from <strong>the</strong> Whitaker Foundation, U.S.<br />

Army, National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health and<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Education’s National Institute<br />

on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.<br />

He works in association with colleagues<br />

at <strong>the</strong> National Rehabilitation Hospital.<br />

Imaging <strong>the</strong> Human Brain:<br />

New Insights into Stroke Recovery<br />

Joseph Hidler, Ph.D., associate<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essor in <strong>the</strong> Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Biomedical <strong>Engineering</strong> and<br />

director <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Center for Applied<br />

Biomechanics and Rehabilitation<br />

Research (CABRR) at <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Rehabilitation Hospital, has<br />

teamed up with <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health to better<br />

understand how <strong>the</strong> brain<br />

changes following stroke and how<br />

new interventions<br />

may enhance recovery. Hidler<br />

has spearheaded <strong>the</strong> effort by<br />

developing Magnetic Resonance<br />

Imaging (MRI) compatible testing<br />

devices that allow researchers to accurately<br />

study brain activity in humans during well-controlled<br />

behavioral tasks.<br />

Until now, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major limitations with<br />

functional MRI (fMRI) has been <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> good<br />

quantitative measurement tools that can be used<br />

<strong>inside</strong> a magnetic field. Subjects are <strong>of</strong>ten asked<br />

to tap <strong>the</strong>ir fingers or perhaps pinch a small<br />

force sensor while <strong>the</strong>ir brain activity is being<br />

monitored. <strong>The</strong> problem is that <strong>the</strong>se tasks are<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r not well controlled for or cannot be performed<br />

by individuals with major functional<br />

impairments, particularly after stroke. As a<br />

result, correlations between <strong>the</strong>se motor tasks<br />

(e.g. moving a finger) and <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brain<br />

that is responsible for <strong>the</strong> movement are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

inaccurate. Hidler decided to build custom<br />

devices that overcome <strong>the</strong>se limitations. “<strong>The</strong><br />

main motivation for developing <strong>the</strong>se devices<br />

was to better understand what happens in <strong>the</strong><br />

brain in stroke survivors following intensive <strong>the</strong>rapy.<br />

Throughout <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> an intervention,<br />

we constantly measure an individual’s function —<br />

walking ability, strength, endurance and more.<br />

But we still don’t know how changes in <strong>the</strong> brain<br />

are responsible for <strong>the</strong>se improvements” he<br />

says. “Unfortunately when we decided to add a<br />

neuroimaging component to one <strong>of</strong> our studies<br />

in hopes <strong>of</strong> answering this question, we found<br />

that <strong>the</strong>re were inadequate test devices currently<br />

available.”<br />

To address this issue, Hidler developed upper<br />

and lower extremity test devices that allow<br />

researchers to study brain activity during fMRI<br />

testing in a well-controlled manner. <strong>The</strong> arm<br />

device allows for accurate measures <strong>of</strong> forces<br />

generated by subjects at <strong>the</strong>ir wrist while <strong>the</strong><br />

lower extremity device allows for <strong>the</strong> measurement<br />

<strong>of</strong> forces at <strong>the</strong> ankle, knee and hip joints.<br />

“This was definitely a challenging project since<br />

<strong>the</strong> magnetic fields we are working in are very<br />

strong — up to 3 Tesla or 30,000 gauss.” A<br />

refrigerator magnet is about 5-10 gauss!<br />

“Essentially this means that all magnetic materials<br />

have to be replaced; o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong> object will<br />

become a projectile or will heat up. Needless to<br />

say we had to be extremely cautious throughout<br />

<strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> devices.”<br />

Now, researchers can run fMRI tests in<br />

patients with very little function, such as in <strong>the</strong><br />

very acute stages <strong>of</strong> stroke, with high precision.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first studies to be done with <strong>the</strong> new<br />

devices is to compare brain activity before and<br />

after eight weeks <strong>of</strong> gait training. Funded by <strong>the</strong><br />

National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation<br />

Research, this NRH-led multi-center study is<br />

comparing <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> robotic gait training<br />

with conventional gait training. Adding <strong>the</strong><br />

imaging component will provide insight into how<br />

<strong>the</strong> brain re-organizes to enhance function. “We<br />

are finding that in some subjects, <strong>the</strong>ir walking<br />

ability improves substantially, while in o<strong>the</strong>rs we<br />

notice only small gains. By looking at how brain<br />

activity changes before and after training, we<br />

may get a better idea <strong>of</strong> why this is <strong>the</strong> case. If<br />

we can better understand <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> neural<br />

plasticity and neural recovery, in <strong>the</strong> future we<br />

may be able to develop more effective interventions.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> devices are generating a buzz around <strong>the</strong><br />

imaging community. <strong>The</strong> arm device has already<br />

been replicated for Georgetown <strong>University</strong>’s<br />

Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging and<br />

<strong>the</strong> leg module has been built for UCLA’s<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Neurology.<br />

See http://cabrr.cua.edu for more information<br />

on Hidler’s research.<br />

fall2006 | 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!