SAFETY, HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT BULLETIN - MIRMgate
SAFETY, HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT BULLETIN - MIRMgate
SAFETY, HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT BULLETIN - MIRMgate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• re-evaluate downstream risks<br />
• re-visit the facility design, construction operation and closure plans and programmes<br />
• review remedial action plan implementation.<br />
Action plans should be developed and implemented for items identified during inspections, audits or<br />
reviews that require corrective action. A time frame for the corrective action should be established<br />
and agreed to.<br />
A detailed checklist for items to be addressed during a review or audit is included in Appendix D5.<br />
Management Review for Continual Improvement<br />
In order to achieve continuous improvement in tailings management, Group companies should<br />
implement an annual senior management review of the adequacy of policies, objectives and<br />
performance of the tailings management system. The review should include an assessment of the<br />
performance of the tailings disposal facility, the associated environmental impacts, closure, safety and<br />
other issues. Consideration should be given to determine where technology should be transferred and<br />
environmental and safety research should be advanced.<br />
The scope of this review should be appropriate to the levels of the identified risk and re-assess the<br />
need for changes to system in light of inspection reports, changing circumstances, recommendations<br />
and the commitment to continuous improvement. Continuous improvement should be achieved<br />
through the adoption of the appropriate level of practice, improved operational quality and risk<br />
minimisation, anticipation of changes in legislation that could require higher standards, and focus on<br />
sustainable closure as the end goal.<br />
Decommissioning and Closure<br />
Whilst it is not a regulatory requirement in all countries to have approved closure plans it is likely that<br />
most major mining countries will do so in the future. Sustainable closure requires a concerted,<br />
properly managed and integrated team effort. The so-called "Design for Closure", starting at project<br />
inception and continuing throughout the lifecycle of the facility, is becoming a widely accepted principle.<br />
The long-term environmental, health and safety risks posed by the facility after closure should be<br />
assessed to facilitate the closure design process and it should be closed properly to ensure a<br />
sustainable solution in accordance with planned ultimate land use.<br />
Guidance on standards of practice for a ‘Design for the Environment’ approach to closure is given in a<br />
checklist included in Appendix D6.<br />
Worker Safety<br />
It is self evident that worker safety is one of the most important aspects of tailings facility management,<br />
and a fundamental objective of Anglo American plc Golden Rules. Achievement of worker safety is a<br />
natural outcome of many of the other activities highlighted in this bulletin, and safety issues are an<br />
integral part of risk assessment.<br />
The Anglo American Golden Rules for Safety are included in Appendix D7.<br />
Competency and training are fundamental and are addressed in a separate section below.<br />
Emergency Response<br />
Emergency preparedness and response plans should be prepared and documented in order to protect<br />
communities and the environment by minimising possible impacts. These plans should be based on<br />
the tailings facility failure mode and event, risk and dam-break assessments.<br />
The emergency preparedness and response plan would typically contain:<br />
• a safety classification in terms of risk to human life and property (low, medium and high hazard)<br />
• an environmental classification in terms of risk to water, air and land<br />
Issued by the Anglo Technical Division page 10 of 47