29.10.2014 Views

N A E L A - National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys

N A E L A - National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys

N A E L A - National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NAELA Members in the News<br />

(continued from page 31)<br />

Shirley B. Whitenack, Esq.,<br />

was quoted in "N.J. Judge May<br />

Write a Final Chapter in Texas<br />

Legal Saga," which was published<br />

in the March 4, 2006 issue <strong>of</strong> the<br />

San Antonio News Press.<br />

Jim Zeigler, Esq., was quoted<br />

in "Alabama <strong>Law</strong>yer Takes on<br />

Deficit Reduction Act," which was<br />

published in the March 21, 2006<br />

issue <strong>of</strong> AuntMinnie.com.<br />

Jim Zeigler, Esq., was quoted<br />

in "The Broken Branch: An<br />

Unusual <strong>Law</strong>suit Takes Congress<br />

to Task for Shoddy and Partisan<br />

<strong>Law</strong>making in Which a Bill is<br />

Unconstitutionally Being Treated<br />

as <strong>Law</strong>," which was published in<br />

the March 10, 2006 issue <strong>of</strong><br />

Find<strong>Law</strong>.<br />

Jim Zeigler, Esq., was quoted<br />

in "Botched Bill Plaintiff<br />

No Stranger to<br />

Controversy," which was<br />

published in the March 20,<br />

2006 issue <strong>of</strong> Roll Call.<br />

Jim Zeigler, Esq.,<br />

was quoted in "Bill Flap<br />

Could Lift Lincare," which<br />

was published in the<br />

February 2, 2006 issue <strong>of</strong><br />

the TheStreet.com.<br />

Jim Zeigler, Esq.,<br />

was quoted in "House GOP<br />

Won't Revisit Flawed<br />

Budget Bill," which was<br />

published in the February<br />

15, 2006 issue <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Associated Press.<br />

Stuart D. Zimring,<br />

Esq., Bernard A. Krooks,<br />

CELA, Alice Reiter Feld,<br />

CELA, and Harry S.<br />

Margolis, CELA, were quoted<br />

in "Medicaid Changes<br />

to Turn Estate Planning on<br />

Its Head," which was published<br />

in the February 19,<br />

2006 issue <strong>of</strong> the Daily<br />

Record (St. Louis, MO).<br />

Divorce <strong>Elder</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Style<br />

Richard F. Meyer, Esq.<br />

When I began practicing, I litigated<br />

both probate and domestic<br />

matters. There are similarities:<br />

you value assets, identify tax<br />

issues and debts, and determine<br />

<strong>of</strong>fsets against assets to arrive at<br />

a net to divide between the parties.<br />

When interviewing an <strong>Elder</strong><br />

<strong>Law</strong> client, be cautious when discussing<br />

divorce, but clearly, it is<br />

the ultimate spousal resource<br />

assessment.<br />

Once the non-domestic<br />

options are reviewed and the<br />

client decides to pursue divorce,<br />

you have four major considerations<br />

assuming you know you cannot<br />

represent both parties. These<br />

a d v e r t i s e m e n t<br />

considerations warrant their own<br />

in-depth review, but this article<br />

will address the basic elements<br />

and pitfalls <strong>of</strong> each.<br />

Consideration No. 1:<br />

Is the institutionalized<br />

spouse competent?<br />

If competency is an issue, you<br />

will need to decide whether to use<br />

a Domestic or Probate guardian,<br />

depending on what is available in<br />

your state.<br />

If you use a Domestic<br />

guardian, the Civil rules allow for<br />

appointment, which is usually a<br />

domestic attorney. This leads to<br />

more severe domestic litigationstyle<br />

scrutiny. Hopefully, you can<br />

resolve the case with an<br />

agreed entry if you supply<br />

sufficient evidence to<br />

support its terms.<br />

If you use a Probate<br />

Guardian, the Probate<br />

Court and the domestic<br />

litigator require satisfaction.<br />

This added layer<br />

<strong>of</strong> review may hinder<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> an agreed<br />

entry. A significant deviation<br />

from normal division<br />

<strong>of</strong> assets will<br />

require, at minimum,<br />

more persuasion; or to<br />

foreclose Probate Court<br />

objections, a Domestic<br />

Court finding based<br />

upon stipulations.<br />

Consideration No.<br />

2: A first or second<br />

marriage?<br />

In a long-term marriage,<br />

all the assets are<br />

equally divided unless<br />

you provide the Court<br />

with a basis to deviate.<br />

(continued on page 33)<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!