RETINA / VITREOUS SESSION-III - All India Ophthalmological Society
RETINA / VITREOUS SESSION-III - All India Ophthalmological Society
RETINA / VITREOUS SESSION-III - All India Ophthalmological Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
505<br />
<strong>RETINA</strong> / <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
Chairman: Dr. R.B. Jain, Co-Chairman: Dr. Shobit Chawla<br />
Convenor: Dr. Manish Nagpal, Moderator: Dr. Vatsal Shyamlal Parikh<br />
AUTHORS’S PROFILE:<br />
DR. NEHA GOEL: M.B.B.S. (2005), Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi; M.S. (2009),<br />
Guru Nanak Eye Centre, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi. Presently, Guru Nanak<br />
Eye Centre, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi.<br />
E-mail: nehadoc@hotmail.com<br />
An Optical Coherence Tomographic (OCT) Study of Post Laser<br />
Diabetic Cystoid Macular Edema (CME): Intra vitreal Bevacizumab<br />
(IVB) versus Intra Vitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide (IVTA)<br />
Dr. Neha Goel, Dr. Basudeb Ghosh, Dr. Usha Kaul Raina, Dr. Meenakshi Thakar,<br />
Dr. Vinod Kumar, Dr. Vasu Kumar Garg<br />
(Presenting Author: Dr. Neha Goel)<br />
Macular Edema is the single largest cause of<br />
mild to moderate visual loss in persons<br />
with diabetic retinopathy. In the Early Treatment<br />
Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), focal<br />
photocoagulation (direct treatment to<br />
microaneurysms and grid treatment to diffuse<br />
edema) of eyes with Clinically Significant<br />
Macular Edema (CSME) reduced the risk of<br />
moderate visual loss by approximately 50%.<br />
Despite adequate photocoagulation 15 % patients<br />
experienced vision loss of 3 lines after 3 years.<br />
25% of patients with diffuse diabetic macular<br />
edema lost at least 3 lines with modified grid<br />
photocoagulation. Also, the OCT pattern<br />
containing cystoid macular edema (CME) has<br />
poorer visual acuity and comparatively less<br />
favourable outcome especially if previous<br />
attempts at laser have failed.<br />
Alternative treatments for the management of<br />
DME include administration of intravitreal<br />
triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA), which has<br />
demonstrated promising results in diffuse DME,<br />
whether refractory or primary. Clinical use of<br />
Bevacizumab has suggested its efficacy in the<br />
treatment of macular edema associated with<br />
diabetes and central retinal vein occlusion and no<br />
evidence of adverse effects has been noted in<br />
association with intravitreal injection.<br />
Unlike CSME for which primarily laser<br />
photocoagulation has remained the most widely<br />
accepted and used treatment method,<br />
management of diabetic CME is still a dilemma.<br />
Given the difficulties of treating patients with<br />
diabetic CME unresponsive to laser treatment we<br />
decided to evaluate and compare the use of IVTA<br />
and IVB in reducing macular edema and<br />
improving visual acuity.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
The therapeutic response and ocular tolerance of<br />
a single IVTA injection of 4mg were compared<br />
with the outcomes of a single IVB injection of<br />
1.25mg for the treatment of persistent diabetic<br />
CME in a 3 month prospective randomized<br />
interventional case series. Patients were recruited<br />
and enrolled at the Retina Clinic of Guru Nanak<br />
Eye Centre. Written informed consent was<br />
obtained from all the participants before the<br />
procedure.<br />
A total of 30 eyes of patients with Type 1 or 2<br />
Diabetes Mellitus having good metabolic control<br />
(including HbA1C < 10, blood pressure 275 microns were enrolled in this study.<br />
Patients with history of myocardial infarction or<br />
cerebro-vascular accident, history of glaucoma or
506 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
Table-1<br />
Group A Group A P value Group B Group B P value Difference<br />
baseline 12 weeks baseline 12 weeks between<br />
groups (P)<br />
BCVA 0.20 0.32 0.003 0.16 0.22 0.031 0.169<br />
Mean Macular<br />
Thickness 347.7 310.9 0.043 340.5 286.8 0.033 0.391<br />
glaucoma surgery or steroid responsive IOP rise,<br />
cataract extraction or other intraocular surgery<br />
within 3 months, laser treatment including YAG<br />
Capsulotomy within 1 month, history of<br />
receiving any prior intravitreal or sub tenon<br />
injection or known allergy to any components of<br />
the study drugs were excluded from the study.<br />
Also excluded were patients with any significant<br />
media opacity precluding clinical and other<br />
examination, Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy,<br />
vitreo-macular traction on OCT and ischemic<br />
maculopathy on FA.<br />
<strong>All</strong> patients underwent detailed history taking<br />
and base line examination including Best<br />
Corrected Visual Acuity (Snellen chart), detailed<br />
anterior segment examination with special<br />
reference to the lens status, slit lamp<br />
biomicroscopy using 90D non contact lens,<br />
Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, fundus<br />
fluorescein angiography and macular thickness<br />
mapping using Third generation Optical<br />
coherence tomography evaluation. <strong>All</strong> patients<br />
were kept on a regular follow up for a minimum<br />
period of 12 wks with respect to above<br />
mentioned criteria. Potential drug and injectionrelated<br />
complications were also observed.<br />
Qualified patients were assigned to receive either<br />
an IVTA or IVB injection within 1 week of<br />
baseline. Treatment was performed as an<br />
outpatient procedure. Topical anesthesia was<br />
obtained with proparacaine eye drops followed<br />
by standard per operative cleaning and draping.<br />
TA was injected into the vitreous inferotemporally<br />
with a 30 gauge needle at a dose of 4<br />
mg in 0.1 ml. Indirect ophthalmoscopy was done<br />
to confirm intravitreal location of the suspension<br />
and perfusion of the optic nerve head. For IVB<br />
injection, 100 mg vial of preservative free<br />
Bevacizumab (Avastin) which contains 4 cc of 25<br />
mg/ml concentration of the drug was used.<br />
0.05cc was injected into the eye using a tuberculin<br />
syringe with 30 gauge needle to deliver a dose of<br />
1.25 mg followed by indirect ophthalmoscopy. In<br />
both cases topical antibiotics were administered.<br />
Results<br />
A total of 27 patients (30 eyes), 24 male and 6<br />
female were included in the study. The treatment<br />
was administered according to random<br />
assignment in all eyes. 11 right eyes and 4 left<br />
eyes were allocated to receive IVB (group A)<br />
while 8 right eyes and 7 left eyes received IVTA<br />
injections (group B). <strong>All</strong> patients were followedup<br />
for 3 months and completed the study.<br />
The mean age of patients was 58.3 (range 45-72).<br />
<strong>All</strong> patients had non insulin-dependent diabetes.<br />
The mean duration of diabetes was 12.1 years. 15<br />
patients were hypertensive and controlled on<br />
drugs. The precise duration of symptoms<br />
attributable to macular edema was difficult to<br />
determine, but it was longer than 24 weeks. Mean<br />
HbA1c was 8.07.<br />
Maximum improvement in macular thickness<br />
was seen in both groups at 3 weeks. However<br />
changes of retinal thickness and BCVA correlated<br />
weakly.<br />
None of the patients in group A developed<br />
cataract progression. In group B, 5 out of 10<br />
phakic patients had an increase in cataract, 2 out<br />
of which required surgery at the end of 12 weeks.<br />
5 out of 15 patients in Group B developed a<br />
temporary rise in IOP in excess of 22 mm Hg<br />
which resolved on medical therapy. None of the<br />
patients in group A developed rise in IOP.<br />
No severe adverse event was observed<br />
throughout the study. No systemic or serious<br />
drug-related adverse events were observed.<br />
Subconjunctival haemorrhage was the<br />
commonest side effect noted. Both treatment<br />
procedures were well tolerated, and no clinical<br />
evidence of inflammation, uveitis, endophthalmitis<br />
or ocular toxicity was observed.<br />
Discussion<br />
The present study is an extension of currently
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
507<br />
published reports in that it allows a direct<br />
comparison of IVTA with IVB injection for<br />
persistent diabetic CME regarding safety, as well<br />
as anatomic and functional outcomes.<br />
We found comparable efficacy in both groups<br />
with regards to visual acuity and macular<br />
thickness reduction. Acceleration of cataract<br />
might account for the slightly lower, though not<br />
statistically significant, visual acuity in Group B<br />
at the end of 12 weeks. Maximum reduction in<br />
macular thickness occurred at 3 weeks in both<br />
groups, though a longer follow up is required to<br />
ascertain the precise duration of action of both.<br />
Changes of retinal thickness and BCVA<br />
correlated weakly. One possible explanation is<br />
the duration of the edema - the longer macular<br />
edema is present, the more likely it is to cause<br />
irreversible damage to the photoreceptors and<br />
this damage reduces the potentially beneficial<br />
effect that a reduction in foveal thickness is likely<br />
to have on the visual acuity.<br />
IVB was not found to be associated with<br />
progression of cataract or rise in IOP unlike<br />
IVTA. It may be a suitable alternative in ocular<br />
hypertensives and steroid responders.<br />
The current study had some limitations,<br />
including a relatively small sample size. The<br />
duration of the follow-up is also relatively short,<br />
but most injection and corticosteroid-related<br />
complications other than cataract development<br />
would be expected within the study interval.<br />
In conclusion, the findings from our study<br />
neither advocate nor support the superiority of<br />
IVB or IVTA for the treatment of persistent<br />
diabetic CME, but imply that both IVTA and IVB<br />
injections may be equally efficacious for the<br />
anatomic and functional aspects of improvement<br />
tested in this investigation. However<br />
complications of IVTA namely cataract<br />
progression and rise in IOP, which did not<br />
occur with IVB, must be taken into<br />
consideration.<br />
A Prospective Study of Outcomes in CMV Retinitis Patients on<br />
Haart and Additional Anti CMV Regime, Laser Barrage, Parsplana<br />
Vitrectomy<br />
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous DNA<br />
virus that infects the majority of the adult<br />
population. In the immunocompetent host,<br />
infection is generally asymptomatic. Like many<br />
other herpes viruses, CMV remains latent in the<br />
host and may reactivate if host immunity is<br />
compromised.<br />
In immunocompromised individuals, primary<br />
infection or reactivation of latent virus can lead<br />
to opportunistic infection of multiple organ<br />
systems. In the eye, CMV most commonly<br />
presents as a viral necrotizing retinitis with a<br />
characteristic ophthalmoscopic appearance.<br />
Untreated CMV retinitis inexorably progresses to<br />
visual loss and blindness. Multiple antiviral<br />
agents, delivered locally, systemically, or in<br />
combination, are currently in use to delay or<br />
arrest the progress of the disease. In addition,<br />
highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for<br />
HIV infection has revolutionized the treatment of<br />
CMV retinitis by allowing immune reconstitution<br />
in many individuals.<br />
Dr. Narendra G. Venkata<br />
(Presenting Author: Dr. Narendra G. Venkata)<br />
Mortality/Morbidity: CMV retinitis frequently<br />
results in considerable loss of visual acuity, and,<br />
without treatment, almost universally leads to<br />
blindness. Severe visual loss primarily occurs<br />
from the direct spread of retinitis into the<br />
posterior pole, affecting central vision, or from<br />
retinal detachment (RD) secondary to multiple<br />
retinal breaks in the peripheral, necrotic retina.<br />
Early and aggressive treatment with antiviral<br />
medication for both CMV and HIV, combined<br />
with improved surgical techniques for RD repair,<br />
has helped to improve the visual outcomes in<br />
these patients.<br />
• Retinal detachment occurs in up to 29%.<br />
Retinitis permanently destroys the retina; lesions<br />
change appearance with treatment but do not<br />
become smaller. Retinitis typically develops if the<br />
CD4 count is reduced below 50 cells/mL.<br />
• With the advent of HAART and immune<br />
reconstitution, some patients suffer from a<br />
relatively new condition known as immune
508 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
recovery uveitis (IRU). IRU occurs when the poor<br />
immune response of an immunocompromised<br />
individual is suddenly increased as the restored<br />
immune system recognizes and reacts to viral<br />
antigens in the retina. This reaction can lead to<br />
several complications, including uveitis, leading<br />
to hypotony, cataract, and glaucoma; epiretinal<br />
membrane (ERM); and cystoid macular edema<br />
(CME).<br />
History: Presenting symptoms vary depending<br />
on the location of retinal involvement. Posterior<br />
lesions present with diminished visual acuity.<br />
More peripheral lesions initially can be<br />
asymptomatic. Floaters often are noted if<br />
significant vitritis is present. The eye usually is<br />
white and quiet.<br />
• Natural history<br />
o CMV retinitis is a slowly progressive disease,<br />
requiring weeks to months to involve the<br />
entire retina.<br />
o Initial reports described CMV retinitis as an<br />
end-stage disease. With the use of antiviral<br />
medications, the average survival after<br />
diagnosis ranged from 5.5-8 months. The<br />
advent of HAART has prolonged survival to<br />
years in some instances.<br />
Physical: Patients with suspected CMV retinitis<br />
should have a complete ocular examination of<br />
both eyes. A careful examination should include<br />
the following:<br />
• A thorough slit lamp examination should show<br />
a white and quiet conjunctiva. A red hot eye in<br />
an immunocompromised patient should alert the<br />
clinician to another possible diagnosis. Fine,<br />
stellate keratitic precipitates (KP) characteristic of<br />
CMV may be seen on the corneal endothelium.<br />
Uveitis may be present in the anterior chamber<br />
and, if severe, may require treatment.<br />
• A dilated fundus examination with indirect<br />
ophthalmoscopy is essential for assessing the<br />
location and extent of retinal involvement as well<br />
as for evaluating for retinal breaks or<br />
detachment. Retinal lesions have several<br />
characteristics, as follows:<br />
o Lesions that present posteriorly appear along<br />
retinal vessels as large areas of thick white<br />
infiltrate accompanied by retinal hemorrhage<br />
described as "pizza pie" or "cheese pizza" in<br />
appearance.The peripheral type of lesion<br />
demonstrates a more granular appearance<br />
with satellite lesions and less hemorrhage.<br />
Behind the advancing border is necrotic<br />
retina with mottled pigmentation from<br />
hyperplasia of the RPE.<br />
o Retinitis follows the nerve fiber layer.Retinitis<br />
produces wide areas of necrosis, scarring, and<br />
atrophy. Even severe retinitis is usually<br />
accompanied by minimal vitritis in the<br />
immunocompromised patient. If HAART is<br />
instituted and immune reconstitution occurs,<br />
then IRU with severe anterior and posterior<br />
uveitis may occur. Extensive vascular<br />
sheathing, often described as frosted branch<br />
angiitis, is a known but uncommon<br />
appearance. Retinal vascular<br />
occlusion/nonperfusion can be seen on<br />
fluorescein angiogram.<br />
• Peripheral holes and tears frequently occur in<br />
areas of necrosis. Rate of progression of<br />
untreated retinitis is 250-350 µm per week. Skip<br />
lesions can occur.<br />
• Serial examinations may be necessary at early<br />
stages to distinguish CMV retinitis from HIV<br />
retinopathy with multiple cotton-wool spots.<br />
Optic neuritis can develop without apparent<br />
retinitis.Most patients with CMV retinitis will<br />
initially present with unilateral disease.<br />
Untreated, the immunocompromised patient has<br />
a 50% risk of developing disease in the<br />
contralateral eye within 6 months. This is<br />
reduced to 20% with antiviral treatment and<br />
further reduced with HAART.<br />
Causes: Any immunosuppression due to disease<br />
or medication may allow clinical CMV infection<br />
to develop.<br />
• Acquired immune deficiency syndrome<br />
• Leukemia, lymphoma, and aplastic anemia<br />
• Use of immunosuppressive chemotherapy<br />
• Organ transplant recipients<br />
• The CD4 count is a marker of immune<br />
dysfunction in patients infected with HIV.<br />
o CD4 >50 cells/mL - Little risk; screening<br />
examination every 6 months if CD4 50-100<br />
cells/mL; screen yearly if CD4 >100<br />
cells/mL.CD4
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
509<br />
regimen was used prior to the routine use of<br />
HAART. The frequency of examinations<br />
likely will be modified by assessing viral load,<br />
result of CMV DNA capture, CD4 count, and<br />
response to treatment.<br />
• CMV DNA capture<br />
o A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test can be<br />
qualitative or quantitative. Specimens can be<br />
obtained from blood buffy coat, semen, or<br />
urine. Detection of CMV in the blood by DNA<br />
PCR is most predictive of developing CMV<br />
disease. Patients with AIDS who test positive<br />
will have more than a 60% chance of<br />
developing CMV end-organ disease.<br />
• HIV test<br />
• Complete blood count (CBC) with differential<br />
is important in evaluation for causes of<br />
immunosuppression and in assessment for side<br />
effects of ganciclovir use.<br />
• Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine<br />
baseline assessment and serial measurements are<br />
used to evaluate for side effects of foscarnet or<br />
cidofovir use.<br />
Imaging Studies:<br />
• Ultrasound is used for evaluation of retinal<br />
detachment, particularly if vitritis obscures<br />
adequate fundus visualization.<br />
• Fluorescein angiogram - Assessment for areas<br />
of ischemia<br />
• Chest x-ray - Assessment for concurrent<br />
Pneumocystis pneumonia<br />
Other Tests:<br />
• Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption<br />
(FTA-ABS) test or microhemagglutination-<br />
Treponema pallidum (MHA-TP) - Serologic<br />
testing for infection with syphilis, a differential<br />
diagnosis for CMV retinitis<br />
• Serum toxoplasma titer - Differential diagnosis<br />
for retinitis with vitritis<br />
Procedures:<br />
• Ganciclovir implant<br />
o This intravitreal implant releases ganciclovir<br />
at a steady state for up to 8 months.The<br />
implant provides treatment of CMV retinitis<br />
in 1 eye only. No systemic effect occurs.The<br />
initial implant usually is placed in the<br />
inferotemporal quadrant. Possible<br />
complications include vitreous hemorrhage,<br />
retinal detachment, hypotony, and<br />
endophthalmitis.<br />
• Fomivirsen implant: Fomivirsen is not used as<br />
a primary therapy but is approved for cases not<br />
responding to other therapies.<br />
• Vitreoretinal surgery<br />
o Retinal detachment repair is required in 5-<br />
50% of patients with CMV retinitis.<br />
o Multiple small holes in several areas of the<br />
retina are often responsible for the retinal<br />
detachment. These occur at the junction of<br />
healthy and necrotic retina.<br />
o Primary repair with vitrectomy, air-fluid<br />
exchange, endolaser, and silicone oil<br />
tamponade has improved surgical outcome.<br />
• Laser photocoagulation: Small peripheral<br />
retinal detachments can be repaired with laser<br />
photocoagulation.<br />
• Intravitreal injections of ganciclovir, foscarnet,<br />
or cidofovir<br />
o These injections offer high levels of<br />
intraocular drug for short periods of time.<br />
Staging: CMV retinitis is described by the stage<br />
and zone of involvement.<br />
• Stage<br />
o Active retinitis - 3 general patterns<br />
1. Hemorrhagic - Large areas of retinal<br />
hemorrhage on a background of whitened,<br />
necrotic retina<br />
2. Bush fire - Yellow-white margin of slowly<br />
advancing retinitis at the border of atrophic<br />
retina<br />
3. Granular - Found in the periphery; focal<br />
white granular lesions without associated<br />
hemorrhage<br />
o Necrotic stage - End result of all patterns of<br />
active retinitis is the progression to necrosis.<br />
Retinal tears or holes can develop in these<br />
areas.<br />
• Zone of involvement<br />
o Zone 1 - Within 1500 µm of the optic nerve or<br />
3000 µm of the fovea<br />
o Zone 2 - From zone 1 to equator, at vortex<br />
vein ampullae<br />
o Zone 3 - From zone 2 to the ora serrata<br />
• Zone 2 and 3 are the most common sites of<br />
initial retinal involvement.
510 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
Medical Care: An internist or infectious disease<br />
specialist coordinates medical care. Ophthalmic<br />
assessment is required on a regular basis, with<br />
frequency dependent on existence of CMV<br />
retinitis and on CD4 count. The<br />
immunosuppressed individual requires<br />
evaluation for other opportunistic infections and<br />
surveillance for side effects of prescribed<br />
medications.<br />
• Highly active antiretroviral therapy(HAART)<br />
o This treatment regimen has altered the longterm<br />
management of CMV retinitis. Because<br />
the antiviral medications used to treat CMV<br />
are virustatic, it was necessary for patients to<br />
continue their use for the rest of their lives.<br />
The advent of HAART with consequent<br />
recovery of immune function allows<br />
individuals to discontinue their CMV therapy<br />
if the process has resolved adequately with<br />
initial antiviral treatment.<br />
Surgical Care: Individuals with CMV retinitis<br />
commonly require surgical intervention, whether<br />
for repair of a retinal detachment or for<br />
intravitreal instillation of ganciclovir by injection<br />
or implantation.<br />
• Retinal detachment due to CMV retinitis<br />
o This condition occurs in 5-29% of eyes in<br />
various case series. High incidence of<br />
bilaterality exists.Repair is most successful<br />
with vitrectomy, endolaser, scleral buckle,<br />
and silicone oil endotamponade. A total<br />
reattachment rate of 76% exists; macular<br />
attachment occurs in 90%. Mean<br />
postoperative visual acuity is 6/18.<br />
Prophylactic laser for the other eye with CMV<br />
did not prevent retinal detachment.<br />
HAART therapy, has allowed immune recovery<br />
that, in turn, allows discontinuation of anti-CMV<br />
medication. This often obviates the need for<br />
multiple implant procedures or the long-term<br />
dose related adverse effects of anti-CMV<br />
medications. Finally, IRU has added a new<br />
postscript to the treatment of CMV retinitis.<br />
Complications<br />
• Untreated retinitis will progress to blindness,<br />
from retinal necrosis, optic nerve involvement, or<br />
retinal detachment.CMV retinitis can relapse<br />
despite ongoing treatment.<br />
Prognosis<br />
• Untreated retinitis will progress to blindness,<br />
from retinal necrosis, optic nerve involvement, or<br />
retinal detachment. Of treated patients, 80-95%<br />
will respond, with resolution of intraretinal<br />
hemorrhages and white infiltrates. If treatment is<br />
discontinued and the individual is still<br />
immunocompromised (ie, CD4
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
511<br />
PA), vitrectomy and subretinal drainage with<br />
fluid-gas exchange with or without r-TPA,<br />
submacular surgery, and anti–vascular<br />
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, either<br />
alone or in combination with any of the other<br />
treatment modalities. However, these treatment<br />
approaches have been predominantly described<br />
in isolated, uncontrolled reports, and no<br />
consensus has been reached on their relative<br />
efficacy. The purpose of the current study was to<br />
assess the efficacy of a novel long-term treatment<br />
regime of intravitreal ranibizumab at three<br />
monthly intervals as a treatment for<br />
predominantly hemorrhagic lesions involving<br />
the fovea in eyes with IPCV.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
<strong>All</strong> patients with a diagnosis of IPCV were<br />
identified and they were reviewed and then<br />
progress recorded for the study. Cases were<br />
determined by review of the slit-lamp biomicroscopy<br />
using a 78-diopter lens, colour<br />
fundus photographs, Optical Coherence<br />
Tomography (OCT) and fluoroscein angiograms<br />
showing characteristic lesions of idiopathic<br />
polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (IPCV). They<br />
were subjected to intravitreal Lucentis every<br />
three months for the period of 2 years as<br />
maintenance therapy irrespective of whether<br />
recurrences occurred or not, after various<br />
primary treatments which included 1 with TTT, 2<br />
with PDT+IVTA, 1 with PDT+Avastin, 1 with<br />
PDT+Lucentis, 1 with PDT+Macugen, 1 with<br />
Avastin monotherapy. We injected intravitreal<br />
ranibizumab in all the seven eyes of seven<br />
patients under standard aseptic precautions. The<br />
injection was given at 3 and 3.5 mm from the<br />
limbus in aphakic and pseudophakic eyes<br />
respectively with a 30-G needle on 1 cc syringe<br />
after the anterior chamber paracentesis. The dose<br />
given was 0.05 ml in all cases. Although total<br />
length of follow-up period was variable,<br />
depending on the individual patient<br />
circumstances, follow-up visits were on average,<br />
every month till the completion of 2 years.<br />
Complications were looked for with care such as<br />
endophthalmitis, vitreous haemorrhage, RPE<br />
tears and rip. Subretinal hemorrhage resolution<br />
was defined as absence of any significant blood<br />
observed on slit-lamp bio-microscopy using a 78-<br />
diopter lens and no fluid on OCT and absence of<br />
leakage on FA.<br />
Results<br />
Total no of eyes : 7 (Male : Female = 3: 4)<br />
Mean age<br />
: 70 years (58-84 years)<br />
Mean Follow up : 64 weeks (38- 98 weeks)<br />
Lesion location : Subfoveal or<br />
Juxtafoveal (100%)<br />
Resolution of fluid on<br />
FFA : <strong>All</strong> Cases (100%)<br />
Resolution of fluid<br />
on OCT : <strong>All</strong> Cases (100%)<br />
Mean no. of injections : 5.9 (Max. 9 and Min. 3)<br />
Status of the other eye : Lost due to IPCV Scar<br />
5/7 (74%)<br />
: Normal 2/7 (26%)<br />
Adverse events : Nil<br />
VA Change Improved : 3/7 Cases (43%)<br />
VA Stabilized : 1/7 Case (14%)<br />
VA Deteriorated : 3/7 Cases (43%)<br />
Table-1: Changes In Mean VA (LogMAR<br />
ETDRS) After The Treatment<br />
Change P Value<br />
Baseline 0.53<br />
3 Months 0.57 -0.04 0.705<br />
6 Months 0.52 0.01 0.595<br />
9 Months 0.57 -0.04 0.336<br />
12 Months 0.51 0.02 0.832<br />
Table-2: Changes In Mean Central Retinal<br />
Thickness On OCT After The Treatment<br />
Change P Value<br />
Baseline 297.25<br />
3 Months 253.88 43.37 0.233<br />
6 Months 207.50 89.75 0.107<br />
9 Months 222.38 66.87 0.263<br />
12 Months 208.88 88.37 0.092<br />
Discussion<br />
Subretinal hemorrhage (SRH) resolved after<br />
treatment in the first month in all the eyes. No<br />
significant correlation was observed between<br />
pretreatment VA, initial SRH size or patient age.<br />
<strong>All</strong> the eyes showed complete resolution of fluid<br />
on OCT and no leakage on FA at end of followup.<br />
Most importantly 4 eyes maintained vision<br />
without any further deterioration and showed a<br />
completetly flat fovea on OCT at end of followup<br />
period. Important observation is that the
512 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
other eye of 5/7 (74%) patients was having a<br />
disciform scar leading to lost eye due to the same<br />
disease IPCV. So, most of the affected eyes were<br />
absolutely precious. Another important<br />
observation is the scar formation from the<br />
haemorrhagic polyps after the treatment with<br />
monotherapy with Ranibizumab is less as<br />
compared to various other treatment modalities<br />
and other lost eye. Also, we did not see a single<br />
case of RPE rip or any other untoward incident.<br />
Nishijima et. al. demonstrated that the argon<br />
laser photocoagulation of indocyanine green<br />
angiographically identified feeder vessels to<br />
idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy<br />
has also shown promise in treating the<br />
extrafoveal polyps but can’t be used for the<br />
subfoveal or juxtafoveal polyps. Saaj Ahmed et.<br />
al. suggested that photodynamic therapy for<br />
predominantly hemorrhagic lesions in<br />
neovascular age- related macular degeneration is<br />
very effective in IPCV also. His outcomes suggest<br />
that PDT may help minimize VA loss in eyes<br />
with AMD associated predominantly<br />
1. Nishijima et. al.: Laser photocoagulation of<br />
indocyanine green aniographically identified feeder<br />
vessels to idiopathic polypoidal choroidal<br />
vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:770–3.<br />
2. Saad ahmad, Srilaxmi Bearelly, Sandra s. Stinnett,<br />
Michael J. Cooney, and Sharon Fekrat.<br />
Photodynamic therapy for predominantly<br />
hemorrhagic lesions in neovascular age-related<br />
macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;<br />
145:1052–7.<br />
3. Quaranta M, Mauget-Faysse M, Coscas G.<br />
Sutureless vitrectomy has become popular<br />
with the introduction of 25G transconjunctival<br />
vitrectomy in 2002. 1 Recently 23G vitrectomy has<br />
become more popular because of several<br />
advantages.<br />
To describe the initial experience, effectiveness<br />
and safety profile of 23-gauge vitrectomy.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Our study is a prospective, consecutive<br />
References<br />
hemorrhagic CNV lesions. The juxtafoveal and<br />
subfoveal polyps have to be treated with either<br />
PDT (Full fluence or reduced fluence) or the Anti-<br />
VEGF (Avastin, Lucentis or Macugen) only or in<br />
various combinations. But with the repeat PDT, it<br />
can cause the RPE alteration and destruction due<br />
to the very large area of polyps.<br />
OCT measurements we employed were those<br />
taken at the foveal centre. However, this<br />
approach neglects the volumetric thickness of the<br />
haemorrhage across the entire lesion. Attention<br />
to this in future studies may be beneficial.<br />
The newer therapeutic regime for Idiopathic<br />
Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (IPCV) of<br />
giving 3-monthly maintenance intra vitreal<br />
Lucentis Monotherapy when compared with<br />
published natural history data, suggests it may<br />
provide better outcomes than observation alone<br />
for eyes with predominantly hemorrhagic<br />
subfoveal and juxtafoveal lesions in IPCV.<br />
Further study is warranted to fully detail the<br />
benefits and risks and to compare combination<br />
therapy and other available treatment modalities.<br />
Exudative idiopathic polypoidal choroidal<br />
vasculopathy and photodynamic therapy with<br />
verteporfin. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:277–280.<br />
3. Spaide RF, Donsoff I, Lam DL, et al. Treatment of<br />
polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with<br />
photodynamic therapy. Retina 2002;22:529–35.<br />
5. Hiroyuki Iijima, Tomohiro Iida, Masahito Imai,<br />
Takashi Gohdo, and Shigeo Tsukahara. Optical<br />
Coherence Tomography of orange-red subretinal<br />
lesions in eyes with idiopathic polypoidal choroidal<br />
vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:21–6.<br />
Outcome of 78 Consecutive Cases of 23-Gauge Vitrectomy<br />
Dr. Nirmala. R, Dr. N. S. Muralidhar, Dr. Hemanth Murthy<br />
(Presenting Author: Dr. N. S. Muralidhar)<br />
interventional case study of 78 eyes of patients<br />
who underwent 23-gauge vitrectomy operated<br />
by two surgeons from 06-07-07 to 15-04-08. <strong>All</strong><br />
patients had a minimum follow up of 1 month.<br />
Patients were seen on 1st PO day, at 1 week, 2<br />
week, 1 month, 2 month and 3 month post<br />
operatively.<br />
At 3 weeks post operative period, the<br />
keratometric values of central cornea were<br />
determined using an automated keratometer.
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
513<br />
The Accurus Vitrector was used for all surgical<br />
procedures.<br />
Seventeen cases were prospectively timed during<br />
the fourth month of the study to obtain an<br />
estimate of opening and closing times.<br />
Surgical opening time was defined as the interval<br />
between the first instrument contacting the<br />
conjunctiva through the placement of all<br />
cannulas and infusion line. The closing time was<br />
defined as the time required to remove the<br />
cannulas and infusion line.<br />
Main outcome measures: Intraoperative and<br />
post operative complications, patient comfort<br />
post operatively, preoperative vs. post operative<br />
corneal astigmatism, and whether surgical goals<br />
were achieved.<br />
Results<br />
Indications for vitrectomy were: Macular hole-18<br />
eyes; ERM-21 eyes. Vitreous hemorrhage-22 eyes,<br />
Membrane surgery-14 eyes. Miscellaneous: 3<br />
eyes (Asteroid hyalosis-1eye, macular<br />
hole+inferior RD-1 eye, recurrent subtotal<br />
rhegmatogenous inferior RD-1 eye). Of the 78<br />
cases, 60 eyes were phakic, 18 eyes were<br />
pseudophakic. Mean opening time was 180<br />
seconds (range, 120–300s). The mean closing time<br />
was 90 seconds (range 60–240s).<br />
Intraoperative complications: Ports were<br />
sutured due to leakage in 7 eyes (8.97%).<br />
Surgical goals: In 66 eyes (84.62%) we were able<br />
to complete the surgery by 23Gauge approach.<br />
Silicone oil injection was done in 3 eyes (3.85%)<br />
after enlarging a single port.<br />
Single port was enlarged for 20G instruments in<br />
2 eyes (2.56%).<br />
Macular hole was closed in 15 eyes (83.33%) -<br />
clinically, and confirmed on optical coherence<br />
tomography.<br />
16 eyes (76.19%) which underwent ERM peeling<br />
showed normal contour on OCT.<br />
Of the 36 eyes which had vitreous hemorrhage<br />
and membrane surgery, vision improved in 33<br />
eyes (91.67%).<br />
Postoperative complications: Choroidal<br />
detachment due to hypotony (IOP< 6 mmHg)<br />
was seen on 3rd PO day in 3 eyes (3.85%) which<br />
resolved spontaneously.<br />
No patient had observable leakage of gas during<br />
the postoperative period None of the patients<br />
developed post operative endophthalmitis.<br />
Significant cataract was seen in 7 eyes (8.97%) on<br />
follow up. Of these, 1 eye underwent combined<br />
silicone oil removal with cataract surgery and<br />
PCIOL implantation 3 months after primary<br />
vitrectomy. 2 eyes underwent SOR with revision<br />
vitrectomy and cataract surgery with PC IOL.<br />
Revision vitrectomy was done in 5 eyes (6.41%).<br />
Patient comfort: Patients had higher comfort post<br />
operatively. In the initial period we found<br />
Subconjunctival hemorrhage to be more common<br />
postoperatively. The incidence however<br />
decreased later probably due to the learning<br />
curve. We found that by day 7 most of the eyes<br />
appeared normal, with no evidence of post<br />
operative congestion.<br />
Post operative astigmatism: The corneal<br />
astigmatism remained the same in 22 eyes<br />
(28.20%), there was induced astigmatism of 0.25D<br />
in 25 eyes (32.05%), 0.5 D in 3 eyes (3.84%) and<br />
0.75D in 3 eyes (3.84%). The corneal astigmatism<br />
decreased by 0.25D in 25 eyes (32.05%). The axis<br />
changed in 12 eyes (15.4%) and remained<br />
unchanged in 66 eyes (84.6%).<br />
Discussion<br />
Our study showed similar results as that<br />
conducted by Fine et al 2 which was however a<br />
retrospective noncomparative analysis of 77<br />
consecutive cases of 23G vitrectomy in a variety<br />
of vitreoretinal conditions.<br />
The mean opening time (180s) and closing time<br />
(90s) was longer in our study, compared to study<br />
of Fine et al where the opening and closing time<br />
was 103s and 75s respectively.<br />
The indications for 23G vitrectomy in our study<br />
were similar except we did not include any<br />
patients with retained lens fragments.<br />
Study done by Barbara et al 3 which was a<br />
comparative prospective study b/w 23G and 20G<br />
vitrectomy showed that 23G vitrectomy offers<br />
higher patient comfort during the early<br />
postoperative period, similar to what we found<br />
in our study.<br />
In our study we found postoperative hypotony<br />
to be transient, with the incidence being almost<br />
similar to that of the study by Fine et al.<br />
We found that the 23g instruments are less<br />
flexible and behave more like traditional 20-
514 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
gauge instruments, allowing more thorough<br />
peripheral vitrectomy and higher complex<br />
maneuvers similar to the experience of the<br />
surgeons in the above mentioned studies.<br />
In our study there was no significant change in<br />
corneal astigmatism at 3 weeks when the<br />
preoperative and post operative K1 K2 readings<br />
were compared. This parameter has been studied<br />
for the first time in patients undergoing 23gauge<br />
vitrectomy.<br />
23G vitrectomy is safe and effective for a wide<br />
1. Gildo Y. Fujii, Eugene de Juan Jr, Mark S.<br />
Humayun, Dante J. Pieramici, Tom S. Chang,<br />
Eugene Ng, Aaron Barnes, Sue Lynn Wu, Drew N.<br />
Sommerville A new 25-gauge instrument system for<br />
transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery,<br />
Ophthalmology 2002;109:1807-13.<br />
2. Howard F. Fine, Reza Iranmanesh,, Diana Iturralde,<br />
Richard F. Spaide Outcome of 77 consecutive cases<br />
of, 23-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy surgery<br />
References<br />
variety of vitreoretinal surgical indications.<br />
Patients were comfortable postoperatively and<br />
there was no significant induced corneal<br />
astigmatism. Sutureless posterior segment<br />
surgery provides for decreased conjunctival<br />
scarring, better patient comfort, and reduced<br />
postoperative astigmatic changes. By eliminating<br />
suturing of sclerotomies surgical opening and<br />
closing times are reduced. However<br />
postoperative rates of wound leakage, hypotony,<br />
and choroidal detachment may be higher.<br />
for posterior segment disease, Ophthalmology 2007;<br />
114:1197–1200.<br />
3. Barbara Wimpissinger, Lukas Kellner, Werner<br />
Brannath, Katharina Krepler, Ulrike Stolba,<br />
Christian Mihalics and Susanne Binder 23 gauge<br />
versus 20 gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy: A<br />
prospective randomized clinical trial, Br J<br />
Ophthalmol. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.140509<br />
AUTHORS’S PROFILE:<br />
DR. MEENA CHAKRABARTI: M.B.B.S. (’85), Medical College, Trivandrum, University of<br />
Kerala; M.S. (’89), Govt. Ophthalmic Hospital RIO, Trivandrum; D.O. (’88), RIO and D.N.B.<br />
(’91), Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai. Recipient of Several awards instituted by KSOS and<br />
Editor, Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology. Presently, Senior Consultant and Vitreo Retinal<br />
Surgeon, Chakrabarti Eye Care Centre, Trivandrum.<br />
Contact: (0471)2555530, E-mail: tvm_meenarup@sancharnet.in<br />
Intravitreal Monotherapy with Bevacizumab (IVB) and<br />
Triamcinolone Acetonide (IVTA) Versus Combination Therapy<br />
(IVB and IVTA) for Recalcitrant Diabetic Macular Edema<br />
Dr. Meena Chakrabarti, Dr. Arup Chakrabarti, Dr. Valsa T. Stephen, Dr. Soniarani John<br />
(Presenting Author: Dr. Meena Chakrabarti)<br />
Recalcitrant diabetic macular edema is<br />
characterized by the accumulation of plaques<br />
of hard exudates in a grossly edematous retina,<br />
not amenable to the standard modalities of<br />
therapy and showing a very poor visual<br />
potential. Majority of these eyes would have had<br />
several sittings of laser photocoagulation and<br />
hence it is necessary to employ alternative<br />
treatment modalities.<br />
Initial reports on uncontrolled interventional case<br />
series reported an unprecedented efficacy of<br />
intravitreal steroids in reducing diabetic macular<br />
edema often accompanied by significant<br />
improvement in visual acuity. These<br />
uncontrolled series were followed by<br />
randomized placebo-controlled trials<br />
demonstrating the efficacy of IVTA. The<br />
beneficial effect of intravitreal injection of<br />
triamcinolone acetonide in most cases lasts for 6-<br />
9 months. In the Intravitreal Triamcinolone<br />
acetonide for clinically significant Diabetic<br />
Macular Edema that persists after laser treatment<br />
study (TDMO), the mean number of injections<br />
was only 2.4 over 2 years with a total potential<br />
for five injections. It has also been reported that<br />
repeated intravitreal injection may not be as<br />
effective as the initial treatment. The high<br />
incidence of adverse effects include cataract
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
515<br />
(54%), glaucoma (20-40%) and need for<br />
trabeculectomy (6 %) demands caution in its use.<br />
The introduction of IVTA has been a major<br />
advance in the treatment of refractory diabetic<br />
macular edema.<br />
Patients with diabetic macular edema have been<br />
found to have increased levels of VEGF in the<br />
vitreous. Hence intravitreal injection of anti<br />
VEGF may have a role in reducing diabetic<br />
macular edema. Their efficiency is similar to<br />
IVTA, but they do not cause adverse events<br />
associated with corticosteriods. On the other<br />
hand, frequent injection (every 4-6 weeks) for an<br />
extended period may be required, making<br />
injection related complications such as infectious<br />
endophthalmitis a major draw back.<br />
We undertook a pilot study to compare the<br />
efficacy of intravitreal monotherapy with<br />
Triamcinolone and Bevacizumab versus<br />
combination of Bevacizumab and triamcinolone<br />
in the management of recalcitrant DME not<br />
amenable to laser treatment. We also assessed the<br />
OCT patterns in recalcitrant DME which showed<br />
a favourable response to intravitreal injection of<br />
Triamcinolone and Bevacizumab.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
The study was designed as a prospective<br />
randomized interventional study which<br />
recruited 60 patients who fulfilled all the<br />
inclusion criteria from March 2006 – March 2008.<br />
The inclusion criteria for enrolment into the<br />
study were:<br />
i) Diabetic age ≥ 10 years, ii) Good Glycaemic<br />
Control (Hb A1C ≤ 7 gm%), (iii) Stable Renal<br />
Status, (iv) Controlled serum lipid level, (v) H/o<br />
prior Focal/ Grid laser PHC (≥ 3 sittings) ≤ 6<br />
months to the time of enrolment into the study.<br />
(vi) Presence of DME clinically and<br />
angiographically, (vii) OCT showing CRT ≥ 300<br />
µm, (viii) Absence of significant lens opacity, (ix)<br />
Absence of macular ischemia, (x) Absence of<br />
VMT or a taut posterior hyaloid phase in OCT.<br />
Exclusion criteria were poorly controlled<br />
diabetics with associated nephropathy and<br />
dyslipidemia, significant cataract precluding<br />
fundus evaluation or presence of macular<br />
ischemia. The patients were randomized to<br />
receive one of the three modes of interventions<br />
tested in this study.<br />
Group B: Received 0.05 ml / 1.25 mg Intravitreal<br />
injection of Bevacizumab (n=20).<br />
Group T: Received 4 mg / 0.1 ml Triamcinolone<br />
acetonide injection intravitreally (n=20).<br />
Group BT: Received both Bevacizumab and<br />
Triamcinolone acetonide (n=20).<br />
Thus for the purpose of this study recalcitrant<br />
diabetic macular edema was defined as the<br />
presence of gross macular edema in a chronic<br />
diabetic patient with history of ≥3 sittings of focal<br />
/ grid laser photocoagulation ≥6 months prior to<br />
enrollment; OCT showing a central retinal<br />
thickness ≥300 µm, no angiographic evidence of<br />
macular ischemia and absence of vitreomacular<br />
traction or a taut posterior hylaoid.<br />
<strong>All</strong> patients underwent a thorough preoperative<br />
evaluation. The best corrected visual acuity was<br />
determined after dilated refraction. Slit lamp<br />
biomicroscopy of the macula, applanation<br />
tonometry and indirect ophthalmoscopic<br />
evaluation of the fundus were performed. The<br />
degree of cataract was assessed prior to<br />
intervention. <strong>All</strong> patients underwent a<br />
fluorescein angiographic evaluation and OCT<br />
assesment of central retinal thickness and pattern<br />
of edema as part of the baseline evaluation. An<br />
informed consent was obtained in all the<br />
patients. The intervention was performed under<br />
strict aseptic precautions in the operation theatre<br />
under topical anesthesia in all the patients.<br />
Paracentesis was performed to bring the IOP<br />
under control and the eye was kept patched for<br />
an hour after the procedure. Postoperatively 3<br />
hours after the procedure applanation tonometry<br />
was performed in all patients using the Keeler<br />
Pulsair non contact tonometer. The patients were<br />
instructed to use topical antibiotic drops plus,<br />
topical non steroidal anti inflammatory drops 4<br />
times daily and topical dorzolamide drops once<br />
at bed time for a period of 7 days postoperatively.<br />
Counseling on the appearance of floaters and<br />
slight visual blurring was discussed with the<br />
patients.<br />
The patients were followed up on day 7, 30 days<br />
and 90 days after the procedure. At each visit an<br />
assessment of the glycaemic status, control of BP,<br />
renal status and serum lipid profile was assessed.<br />
FFA and OCT were performed at 30 days and 90<br />
days after the procedure. Refraction, tonometry,<br />
slit lamp evaluation for cataract and
516 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
biomicroscopic macular evaluation for degree of<br />
macular edema was performed at all visits.<br />
Response to therapy was assessed by 1)<br />
Improvement in the best corrected visual acuity<br />
2) Slit lamp biomicroscopy and OCT showing<br />
reduction in retinal thickness 3) FFA showing<br />
decrease in fluorescein leakage 4) Progression of<br />
lenticular changes 5) Presence or absence of post<br />
treatment IOP spike 6) Recurrence 7) Presence of<br />
any complications associated with the<br />
intervention was recorded. <strong>All</strong> patients in this<br />
study underwent focal/grid laser<br />
photocoagulation 4 weeks after the primary<br />
intervention.<br />
Results<br />
The patients were of the age group ranging from<br />
45-70 years (Mean age 58 years). There were 46<br />
males and 14 females in our study giving a M: F<br />
ratio of 3:1. The mean duration of diabetes was<br />
13.5 years ( Range 7 years -20 years) and the<br />
mean value of glycosylated haemoglobin at<br />
baseline was 6.7 ( Range 5.9 - 7.5). Associated comorbid<br />
conditions were:<br />
1) Hypertension: 25 (41.67%), 2) Hyperlipidemias<br />
: 40 (66.67%), 3) Chronic Renal failure : 3 (5%), 4)<br />
Both HT and HL: 30 (50%), 5) No associated<br />
disease : 15 (25%).<br />
50% of the patients had proliferative diabetic<br />
retinopathy associated with maculopathy and<br />
50% had background diabetic retinopathy with<br />
clinically significant macular edema.<br />
In group T (IVTA Group): An improvement in<br />
visual acuity was observed in 9/20 eyes (45%)<br />
who showed a mean reduction of central retinal<br />
thickness in the OCT scans from a baseline mean<br />
CRT value of 550 µm ± 26 µm to 285 µm ± 20µm.<br />
In the remaining 11 patients the mean reduction<br />
in central retinal thickness was by 20% of baseline<br />
value (from a mean CRT at baseline of 550 µm ±<br />
26 µm to 350 µm ± 20µm) at 6 months follow up.<br />
Although there was no improvement in visual<br />
acuity, the vision stabilized at the baseline level.<br />
This reduction in central retinal thickness<br />
persisted up to 6-9 months after which the<br />
recurrence of CSME was observed in 15 of the 20<br />
eyes (75%). These eyes underwent focal/grid<br />
laser photocoagulation (11/15 eyes : 73.3%) or<br />
repeat IVTA (4/15 eyes: 27.7%).<br />
Progression of cataract was noticed in 6 eyes<br />
(30%) and 2 patients with significant cataract<br />
underwent phacoemulsification with foldable<br />
IOL implantation under topical anesthesia.<br />
Intraocular pressures increased to mid twenties<br />
in 3 eyes (15%) but could be controlled medically<br />
with single antiglaucoma medication<br />
(Dorzolamide).<br />
There were no cases of endophthalmitis, vitreous<br />
hemorrhage or retinal detachment in this group.<br />
Group B (Intravitreal Bevacizumab injection):<br />
An improvement in visual acuity was observed<br />
in 11/20 eyes (55%) in this group. <strong>All</strong> 20 eyes<br />
showed some reduction in central retinal<br />
thickness, however a 25% reduction from<br />
baseline value was obtained in 59% of our<br />
patients in this group. Maximum beneficial effect<br />
was observed within 30 days of the injection and<br />
with additional laser therapy the effect persisted<br />
up to 9 months. Repeat injection were not<br />
necessary up to 12 months. However some<br />
increase in CRT was noticed in 15% of patients<br />
after 9 months for which additional laser was<br />
given. Further follow up alone will give an idea<br />
of the course of disease and the necessity for<br />
reinjections. Elevation in intraocular pressure<br />
was noticed in one patient (5%) which was<br />
amenable to medical therapy.<br />
Group BT (Combined IVTA and IVB): An<br />
improvement in visual acuity was observed in<br />
60% (12/20) eyes. The reduction in the central<br />
retinal thickness was maximum in this group and<br />
was observed in 64% of eyes. The reduction in<br />
retinal thickness peaked at one month post<br />
injection and persisted up to 9 months.<br />
Recurrences in 15% of eyes were similar to group<br />
B showing that an additional injection of TA did<br />
not have any effect in preventing recurrences. A<br />
higher incidence of elevated intraocular pressure<br />
in 22% of cases questioned the efficacy of adding<br />
TA, when IVB alone would have been effective.<br />
We divided the patients in to 4 groups based on<br />
the preinjection OCT findings<br />
1) Diffuse edema, 2) Cystoid edema, 3) Sub foveal<br />
serous retinal detachment, 4) Plaques of hard<br />
exudates under fovea, 5) Combination and tried<br />
to correlate with the response to therapy as<br />
measured by CRT and improvement in vision.<br />
Our results showed that maximum reduction of<br />
central retinal thickness and maximum visual
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
517<br />
OCT GRADING No of Pre injection Post injection Pre injecton Post injection<br />
Eyes/% CRT (Mean) CRT (Mean) vision (Mean) vision (Mean)<br />
Diffuse edema 20 (33.33%) 500 µm 309 µm 5/60 6/18<br />
Cystoid edema 10(16.67%) 422 µm 315 µm 3/60 5/60<br />
Subfoveal serous RD 14 (20%) 418 µm 256 µm CF 2m 6/36<br />
Plaques of H/E 6 (10%) 325 µm 250 µm CF1m CF1m<br />
Combination 10 (16.67%) 550 µm 350 µm CF 2m 4/60<br />
gain were observed in eyes with greater degree<br />
of diffuse macular edema and presence of sub<br />
foveal serous RD.<br />
Discussion<br />
Thus the result of this study shows that:<br />
1. IVTA has an excellent transient effect of<br />
causing resolution. Recurrences in 75%,<br />
elevated IOP in 15% of cases after IVTA point<br />
to the fact that IVTA should be advised with<br />
caution and the patients monitored regularly<br />
after intervention.<br />
2. IVB is as efficacious or more so with respect to<br />
visual gain (45% Vs 55%) and resolution of<br />
CSME (45%Vs 59%). The incidence of<br />
elevated IOP in only 5% and recurrence in<br />
15% point to the fact that IVB may be a better<br />
option to IVTA<br />
3. Combining IVB with IVTA, did not have the<br />
expected effect of doubling the resolution and<br />
visual recovery. A higher incidence of<br />
glaucoma in 22% makes this combination<br />
unsafe. The incidence of recurrence was same<br />
as in IVB group.<br />
4. Greater degree of diffuse edema and presence<br />
of sub foveal serous RD are indicators of a<br />
favorable response to IVTA and IVB.<br />
5. The prediction of poor visual prognosis<br />
included poor preoperative vision, HbA1C ><br />
7 during the study period, plaques of hard<br />
exudates under fovea and presence of large<br />
cystoid spaces under fovea.<br />
Our study differed from that of Paccola L et al<br />
and Shimura.M et al, who demonstrated that one<br />
single intravitreal injection of triamcilone may<br />
offer certain advantage over Bevacizumab in the<br />
short term management of refractory diabetic<br />
macular edema especially with regard to central<br />
macular thickness. In our study the response to<br />
therapy with triamcinolone and Bevacizumab<br />
were essentially similar with Bevacizumab<br />
showing superiority with respect to lesser<br />
incidence of post intervention IOP Spike.<br />
Similar results were obtained by Soheilian M et<br />
al in a study which compared the efficacy of<br />
intravitreal monoptherapy with Bevacizumab<br />
alone or combined with triamcinolone accetonide<br />
which showed that intravitreal Bevacizumab<br />
monotheraoy yielded better visual outcome than<br />
laser photocoagulation. No further beneficial<br />
effect of intravitreal triamcinolone could be<br />
demonstrated.<br />
Hamid Ahmadieh et al reported that there was<br />
no significant difference with respect to visual<br />
recovery and central retinal thickness between<br />
the IVB and IVB/IVT groups which is again<br />
similar to our study.<br />
These results comprehensively prove that there<br />
is no added benefit of combining IVB and IVTA.<br />
1. Shimura Masahiko, Nakazawa, Tosu, Yasuda<br />
Kamako.Comparative therapy evaluation of<br />
intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone<br />
acetonide on persistent diffuse diabetic<br />
macular edema. Am J. Ophthalmol 2008;145:<br />
854-61. Epub 2008, March 6.<br />
2. Masoud Soheilian, Alireza Ramezani, Bijan<br />
Bijanzadeh, Mehdi Yaseri. Intravitreal<br />
bevacizumab ( Avastin) injection alone or<br />
References<br />
combined with triamcinolone versus macular<br />
photocoagulation as primary treatment of<br />
diabetic macular edema. Retina 27:1187-95.<br />
3. Kook, Daniel MD, Wolf, Atmin MD,<br />
Kreutzer, Thomas MD, Neubaucer, Aljosiha<br />
MD, Rupert MD. Long term effect of<br />
intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) in patients<br />
with chronic diffuse diabetic macular edema.<br />
Retina 2008;28:1053-60.
518 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
4. L Paccola, R A Costa, M S Fologosa, J C<br />
Barbosa, I U Scott, R Jorge. Intravitreal<br />
triamcinolone versus bevacizumab for<br />
treatment of refractory diabetic macular<br />
edema (IBEME study). Br J. Ophthalmol<br />
2008;92:76-80. Epub 2007 Oct 26.<br />
5. Hartioglou C, Kook D, Neubaucuer A, Wolf<br />
A. Prighinger S, Strauss R. Intravitreal<br />
bevacizumab ( Avastin) therapy for persistent<br />
diffuse diabetic macular edema. Retina 2006.<br />
6. Hamid Ahmadieh, Alireza Ramezani et al.<br />
intravitreal bevacizumab with or without<br />
triamcinolone for refractory DME: a placebo<br />
controlled trial. Graefes Arch. Clin Exp<br />
Ophthalmol 2008;246:483-9.<br />
AUTHORS’S PROFILE:<br />
DR. URVASHI GOJA: M.B.B.S. (2000) and M.S. (2007), Govt. Medical College, University of<br />
Jammu, J&K.<br />
Vitreoretinal fellowship (2007-2009), Banker’s Retina Clinic and Laser Center, Ahmedabad.<br />
E-mail: urvashi.goja@gmail.com<br />
Visual and Surgical Outcomes After Vitrectomy and Internal<br />
Limiting Membrane (ILM) Removal in Terson’s Syndrome<br />
Dr. Urvashi Goja, Dr. Alay S. Banker, Dr. Rohan Chauhan<br />
(Presenting Author: Dr. Urvashi Goja)<br />
The French ophthalmologist, Albert Terson, is<br />
credited with discovering this clinical sign in<br />
a patient with subarachnoid haemorrhage in<br />
1900. Terson’s syndrome encompasses any<br />
intraocular haemorrhage associated with<br />
intracranial subarachnoidal haemorrhage and<br />
increased intracranial pressures. Premacular<br />
haemorrhages have been reported in up to 39%<br />
of cases; often with a location beneath the ILM.<br />
The pathogenesis of Terson’s syndrome has been<br />
controversial. A mechanism similar to Valsalva<br />
retinopathy, in which an increase in intracranial<br />
pressure eventually leads to the rupture of retinal<br />
capillaries, has been supported by most authors.<br />
Increased intracranial pressure may force blood<br />
into the subarachnoid space and along the optic<br />
nerve sheath into the pre-retinal space, or the<br />
sudden rise in intracranial pressure may lead to<br />
a decrease in venous return to the cavernous<br />
sinus or obstruct the retinochoroidal<br />
anastomoses and central retinal vein,<br />
culminating in venous stasis and haemorrhage.<br />
The primary objective of this study was to<br />
analyse the visual and surgical outcomes after<br />
vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane<br />
(ILM) removal in Terson’s syndrome.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
12 eyes of 9 patients were included in the study.<br />
Informed consent was obtained from each<br />
patient. Preoperative data collected included age,<br />
sex, best corrected Snellen visual acuity and<br />
underlying condition. <strong>All</strong> cases came with<br />
history of trauma with subdural, subarachnoid<br />
or intracranial haemorrhage on CT/ MRI. One<br />
patient had a history of hypertension with right<br />
middle cerebral artery aneurysm. In two patients<br />
sharply demarcated, dome-shaped sub-ILM<br />
haemorrhage could be clearly identified on<br />
fundus examination. Rest of the patients had<br />
vitreous hemorrhage, and sub-ILM location of<br />
the bleeding that became apparent only during<br />
vitrectomy. <strong>All</strong> 9 patients underwent early<br />
vitrectomy and ILM peeling because of<br />
insufficient spontaneous visual recovery after a<br />
mean of 6.38 weeks. Outcome measures included<br />
improvement in visual acuity and anatomical<br />
success achieved.<br />
Surgical technique<br />
Nine eyes of seven patients underwent a 20-<br />
gauge three port pars plana vitrectomy. In rest<br />
three eyes of two patients a transconjunctival,<br />
sutureless 23–gauge vitrectomy was performed.<br />
Where necessary the induction of a posterior<br />
vitreous detachment was done followed by a<br />
fluid/air exchange. A volume of 0.5 ml TB 0.06%<br />
solution was injected into the air filled vitreous
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
519<br />
Table-1: Patient Demographics, Diagnosis, and Outcome<br />
NO Case, eye Age Sex Time of Time of Preoperative Final Comments<br />
PPV (wks) follow up visual acuity visual<br />
(wks) acuity acuity<br />
1 1 R 30 M 7 40 6/60 6/9 SAH<br />
2 1 L 30 M 11 36 6/24 6/12 SAH<br />
3 2R 41 F 8 3 PL , PR 6/60 Rt. MCA aneu., RDpostop<br />
4 3R 15 M 3 13 HM 6/9 SDH<br />
5 4R 35 M 1 12 6/60 6/9 EDH,ICH<br />
6 5R 35 M 6 20 CF 6/60 ICH<br />
7 6R 27 M 9 8 CF 6/36 ICH ,SAH<br />
8 6L 27 M 6 12 CF 6/9 ICH ,SAH<br />
9 7R 32 M 2 17 PL , PR 6/12 SAH<br />
10 7L 32 M 1 18 PL , PR 6/36 SAH<br />
11 8R 35 F 1 20 PL , PR 6/12 ICH<br />
12 9R 30 M 2 12 CF 6/60 SAH<br />
SDH = subdural haematoma, EDH = extradural haematoma. PL = projection of light PR = perception of light . PPV =<br />
pars plana vitrectomy, MCA = middle cerebral artery, ICD = intracranial hemorrhage, SAH= subarachnoid hemorrhage<br />
cavity over the posterior pole. After 2 minutes,<br />
still under air, the dye was removed. An air/fluid<br />
exchange was carried out. The ILM stained a<br />
faint blue color and was clearly visualised under<br />
standard illumination. It was directly engaged<br />
with the intraocular ILM forceps to create a flap<br />
and then peeled from the nerve fiber layer plane<br />
usually in a capsulorrhexis fashion. There was a<br />
distinct contrast between stained ILM and<br />
unstained retina thus, enabling and facilitating<br />
the complete removal of this tissue. Where<br />
possible, the ILM was removed up to both<br />
superior and inferior temporal arcades allowing<br />
complete aspiration and evacuation of the<br />
hemorrhage beneath it. Some cases had<br />
associated ERM which was also removed. No<br />
intraoperative complications were observed.<br />
Results<br />
Patient demographics, diagnosis, and outcome<br />
are tabulated in Table 1. Seven patients were<br />
males and two were females. Mean patient age<br />
was 32 (range 15- 41). The mean follow up<br />
period was 17.36 weeks (range 3-40 weeks).<br />
Preoperative best corrected Snellen visual acuity<br />
ranged from PL to 6/36. ILM peeling allowed<br />
complete aspiration of the hemorrhage and<br />
resulted in excellent visual recovery in all<br />
patients. There was substantial and rapid visual<br />
improvement, with eyes achieving excellent final<br />
visual acuity compared to mean preoperative<br />
visual acuity ranging from light perception to<br />
6/36. Postoperative best corrected Snellen visual<br />
acuity ranged from 6/36 to 6/9. Among the nine<br />
patients studied, six had improvement of 4 or<br />
more Snellen lines. None of the cases showed any<br />
evidence of residual membranes or recurrence.<br />
No procedure-related complications were<br />
observed. However, one patient developed<br />
retinal detachment 4 weeks post-operatively,<br />
which was successfully reattached with a second<br />
surgery. The three eyes operated using 23-<br />
gauge vitrectomy showed significantly faster<br />
recovery and lesser patient discomfort.<br />
Discussion<br />
Terson’s Syndrome presents with collection of<br />
blood in the sub-ILM space usually over the<br />
posterior pole. Spontaneous reabsorption of the<br />
haemorrhage may occur, but this could take 1–2<br />
months, during which time the persistence of<br />
blood may irreversibly damage the retina and<br />
cause permanent visual loss as a result of the<br />
formation of preretinal tractional membrane and<br />
proliferative vitreoretinopathy. The toxic effects<br />
of longstanding haemorrhage are even more<br />
destructive in macular than in subhyaloidal<br />
haemorrhage, and haemorrhage beneath the ILM<br />
tends to remain longer than subhyaloidal<br />
haemorrhage. Observation for up to 3 months for<br />
spontaneous clearing of haemorrhage is a<br />
clinically accepted practice, but others advocate<br />
early surgery even for these cases, as a prolonged<br />
persistence of haemorrhage may cause
520 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
irreversible retinal damage. Spontaneous<br />
resorption of the sub-ILM and associated<br />
vitreous haemorrhages depends on their severity<br />
and tends to be slow in extensive haemorrhages.<br />
Prolonged contact of the retina with haemoglobin<br />
and its catabolites can possibly cause toxic retinal<br />
damage, which may be irreversible. Other<br />
potential complications of longstanding<br />
intraocular blood persistence include cataract,<br />
epiretinal membranes and other macular<br />
abnormalities, glaucoma, retinal detachment and<br />
proliferative vitreoretinopathy. In all our cases<br />
1. Terson A. De l’he´morrhagie dans le corps vitre au<br />
cours de l’he´morrhagie cerebrale. Clin Ophthalmol<br />
1900;6:309–12.<br />
2. Castren JA. Pathogenesis and treatment of Terson<br />
syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol 1963;41:430–4.<br />
3. Ogawa T, Kitaoaka T, Dake Y, et al. Terson<br />
syndrome: a case report suggesting the mechanism<br />
References<br />
we have performed early vitrectomy surgery<br />
(mean 4.7 weeks) which allowed easy and<br />
complete removal of ILM allowing early visual<br />
rehabilitation and avoiding above mentioned<br />
complications of longstanding haemorrhage.<br />
Early vitrectomy surgery with complete removal<br />
of ILM allows early visual rehabilitation without<br />
any surgical complications. Thus, we<br />
recommend vitrectomy with ILM peeling should<br />
be performed not later than four to six weeks<br />
after the acute injury in Terson’s Syndrome.<br />
of vitreous hemorrhage. Ophthalmology<br />
2001;108:1654–6.<br />
4. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, et al. Terson<br />
syndrome. Results of vitrectomy and the<br />
significance of vitreous hemorrhage in patients with<br />
subarachnoid hemorrhage. Ophthalmology<br />
1998;105:472–7.<br />
AUTHORS’S PROFILE:<br />
DR. SOUMEN MONDAL: M.B.B.S (’97), R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Calcutta<br />
University; M.S. (2005), RIO, Calcutta University, Kolkata; Vitreo-retina Fellow (2008), Aditya<br />
Jyot Eye Hospital, Mumbai. Presently, Consultant, Vitreo-retina Services, Priyamvada Birla<br />
Aravind Eye Hospital, Kolkata.<br />
E-mail: hisoumenm@yahoo.co.in<br />
Combine Sutureless Scleral Buckling With 23G Vitrectomy Using<br />
Fibrin Glue: Is The Sutureless Dream Finally Achieved?<br />
Dr. Soumen Mondal, Dr. Abhijit Datta, Dr. Dharmesh Kar, Dr. Supriya Dabir,<br />
Dr. Najeeha Shukri, Dr. S. Natrarajan<br />
(Presenting Author: Dr. Hemantha Murthy)<br />
Transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy<br />
provides the benefits of sutureless surgery.<br />
Recently, Mentens et al described the advantages<br />
of fibrin glue compared to sutures for vitrectomy<br />
wound closure using a retrospective<br />
questionnaire review of comparable groups of<br />
patients. 1 Unfortunately, the benefits enjoyed by<br />
patients undergoing sutureless vitrectomy<br />
surgery could not be extended to patients<br />
requiring scleral buckling, as anchoring the<br />
buckle elements required sutures. In this pilot<br />
study, 23 eyes (of 23 patients) with<br />
rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with<br />
multiple inferior breaks, we performed<br />
sutureless scleral buckling and 23G vitrectomy<br />
without sutures. Moreover, we used fibrin glue<br />
(ReliSeal) to seal conjunctival peritomy wound<br />
following 23G vitrectomy. Here we discuss the<br />
issues related to the combined vitrectomy and<br />
scleral buckling with use of fibrin glue<br />
(ReliSeal).<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Twentythree eyes of 23 patients (mean age 53.5<br />
years) were analyzed in this series. <strong>All</strong> eyes had<br />
documented rhegmatogenous retinal detachment<br />
with multiple inferior breaks and all eyes were<br />
operated for retinal detachment by single<br />
surgeon.<br />
The technique of scleral buckle and 23G
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
521<br />
vitrectomy was the same in all cases, Briefly, after<br />
360 0 peritomy and cleaning the Tenon’s capsule<br />
from the scleral bed, traction sutures were placed<br />
along the 4 recti muscles, and the retinal<br />
pathology was located by assiduous indirect<br />
ophthalmoscopy. Partial thickness scleral<br />
dissection was made (2.5 mm x 4mm) in 3<br />
quadrants (excluding the quadrant having the<br />
pathology) to accommodate the encircling band<br />
(#240). Later, a partial thickness scleral tunnel<br />
approximately 9mm wide was made at the site of<br />
break(s) to cover the break(s) adequately. The<br />
tire (#279) was anchored into this recess; on the<br />
tire the band was passed. This band was passed<br />
through the 3 scleral tunnels made previously.<br />
The encirclage band was tightened across a<br />
Watzke silicone sleeve.<br />
Then, 23G vitrectomy was done as described by<br />
Eckardt et al. 2 Following vitrectomy, laser,<br />
endophotocoagulation (Iridex Corp, CA, USA)<br />
was done. Following fluid air exchange and<br />
injection of C3F8 (in a nonexpansile proportion),<br />
ports were removed.<br />
The conjunctival peritomy wounds were dried<br />
and apposed; the cut ends of the apposing edges<br />
were kept everted to diminish the chance of<br />
conjunctival inclusion cyst formation. Fibrin<br />
tissue adhesive (ReliSeal, Reliance Life<br />
sciences, Mumbai, <strong>India</strong>) was applied over the<br />
incision margin to seal the peritomy wound.<br />
Results<br />
In the immediate post operative period,<br />
intraocular pressure was within normal limits,<br />
the conjunctival wounds were well apposed<br />
without any sign of dehiscence, retina was well<br />
attached with good buckle height in all the 23<br />
cases.<br />
In the first post operative day, intraocular<br />
pressure was within normal limits, the<br />
conjunctival wounds were well apposed, retina<br />
was attached with good buckle height in all the<br />
23 cases. There was no incidence of postoperative<br />
elevation of intraocular pressure, hypotony or<br />
choroidal edema.<br />
At 1 month of post operative follow up, all the<br />
cases maintained good buckle effect with<br />
successful anatomical attachment of the retina in<br />
all the 23 cases. There was no extrusion or<br />
intrusion of the buckles or infection.<br />
Discussion<br />
Tissue adhesives, both synthetic and biologic,<br />
have a long history of use in ophthalmology.<br />
Recently, fibrin glue (biologic) has gained a major<br />
role as a suture substitute for attaching biologic<br />
tissues and as a surface sealant. Literature<br />
supports expanded use of fibrin glue and a<br />
number of studies of ophthalmic applications are<br />
available, including closure of the conjunctiva in<br />
strabismus surgery, 3 glaucoma surgeries, 4 and<br />
cataract extraction. 5<br />
23G vitrectomy has ushered an era of sutureless<br />
vitrectomy. However, in cases requiring scleral<br />
buckling in addition, the buckling elements<br />
required suturing. Also, the conjunctival<br />
peritomy wound needed to be sutured for<br />
closure.<br />
However, with the technique described herein,<br />
sutureless surgery has become a feasible goal in<br />
selected group of patients. With the sutureless<br />
scleral buckling technique combined with the 23<br />
gauge vitrectomy and use of fibrin glue, no<br />
sutures were needed for the entire procedure.<br />
None of the patient showed postoperative<br />
adverse or allergic reactions, bacterial infections,<br />
and inflammation was minimal. Healing of the<br />
conjunctiva took about 5 days. The surgical time<br />
using fibrin glue is reduced to one-fourth of the<br />
usual 4-8 min necessary for suturing the<br />
conjunctiva. The cost for fibrin glue (INR 1200 ≈<br />
30 USD per patient) is slightly higher than that of<br />
Vicryl 8/0 and Ethibond 5/0 (approximately INR<br />
900 ≈ 22.5 USD per patient). However the<br />
reduced post operative discomfort from sutures<br />
and the quicker healing associated with<br />
documented low rates of infection makes the<br />
fibrin glue a viable option for the discerning<br />
surgeon.<br />
Short term results in our pilot study have shown<br />
that there were no intraoperative and early post<br />
operative complications in any of the cases. Also<br />
a lack of control group of standard operative<br />
procedure which would have admirably<br />
highlighted the differences in the two techniques<br />
can be deemed as a drawback of this study. A<br />
future prospective study with larger sample size,<br />
standard control population and longer followup<br />
would probably address these issues.
522 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
1. Mentens R, Stalmans P. Comparison of fibrin glue<br />
and sutures for conjunctival closure in pars plana<br />
vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:128-31.<br />
2. Eckardt C. Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge<br />
vitrectomy. Retina 2005;25:208-11.<br />
3. Spierer A., Barequet I., Rosner M., Solomon AS,<br />
Martinowitz U. Reattachment of extraocular<br />
muscles using fibrin glue in a rabbit model. Invest<br />
Macular edema associated with vascular<br />
diseases can have different<br />
etiopathogenesis in various vascular pathologies<br />
of retina such as Diabetic retinopathy, Vascular<br />
occlusion and Choroidal neovascularisation.<br />
Intravitreal Triamcinolone has shown significant<br />
effect in treatment of macular edema in afore<br />
mentioned cases. It is the steroid of choice for<br />
intravitreal use because of its long half life and<br />
lack of toxicity. However its effect is transient<br />
and rebound increase in foveal thickness has<br />
been observed after the effect of drug wears off.<br />
Bevacizumab is a full length humanized<br />
monoclonal anti VEGF antibody that inhibits all<br />
biologically active forms of VEGF and is used in<br />
neovascular ARMD and is being explored for<br />
other indications. The drug has demonstrated<br />
promising results in macular edema associated<br />
with retinal vascular obstruction and Diabetic<br />
Retinopathy.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Clinical, interventional, comparative and<br />
prospective study conducted at CH NAGRI EYE<br />
HOSPITAL. 80 patients presenting with cystoid<br />
macular edema due to diabetic retinopathy or<br />
retinal venous occlusion were recruited.<br />
Informed,written consent was obtained from all<br />
subjects before their participation in the study.<br />
<strong>All</strong> patients underwent detailed medical and<br />
ophthalmologic history. Baseline and follow up<br />
assessement of the pts included BCVA on<br />
snellens chart, SLE, fundoscopy with 20D and Slit<br />
lamp biomicroscopy with 90D,OCT, FFA, Colour<br />
References<br />
Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 1996;38:543–6.<br />
4. O'Sullivan F, Dalton R. and. Rostron C K. Fibrin<br />
glue: an alternative method of wound closure in<br />
glaucoma surgery. J Glaucoma 1996;5:367–70.<br />
5. J.C. Kim, S.D. Bassage, M.H. Kempski, del Cerro M,<br />
Park SB, Aquavella JV. Evaluation of tissue<br />
adhesives in closure of scleral tunnel incisions. J<br />
Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21:320–5.<br />
Comparison of Single Dose Intravitreal Bevacizumab with Single<br />
Dose Intravitreal Triamcinolone in Cases of Cystoid Macular<br />
Edema Due To Diabetic Retinopathy and Vascular Occlusion<br />
Dr. Tejas H. Desai, Dr. Nidhi Mittal<br />
(Presenting Author: Dr. Nidhi Mittal)<br />
fundus photography and IOP measurement with<br />
NCT. Patients with history of previous treatment<br />
for the condition in the form of Laser<br />
photocoagulation or intravitreal injection,and<br />
FFA showing ischaemic macula were excluded.<br />
Inclusion criteria was cystoid macular edema<br />
with minimum CFT of 300 microns,assessed by<br />
OCT. The age of patients ranged from 45 to 75yrs<br />
(mean 59.36 yrs) with male/female ratio of 15/7.<br />
Patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups:<br />
Group I: eyes with cystic edema treated with<br />
Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide<br />
(4mg/0.1ml)<br />
Group II: eyes with cystic edema treated with<br />
Intravitreal Bevacizumab (1.25mg/0.05ml)<br />
Patients were followed up on 1week, 1month,<br />
3month, and 6month post procedure.<br />
Results<br />
74/80 patients enrolled for the study completed<br />
6 mth follow up. Group-I: Out of 35 eyes<br />
receiving IV TA, 20 eyes had diabetic macular<br />
edema, 10 eyes had macular edema with CRVO<br />
and 5 eyes had macular edema with BRVO.<br />
Group II: Out of 39 eyes receiving IV<br />
bevacizumab, 16 eyes had diabetic macular<br />
edema, 13 eyes had CRVO with macular edema<br />
and BRVO with macular edema was present in<br />
10 eyes. At the end of 6 months, mean<br />
improvement in VA was 2.5 lines and mean<br />
reduction of central foveal thickness was 248.75<br />
microns in group I.<br />
Mean improvement in VA was 1 line and mean
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
523<br />
reduction in CFT was 131.5 microns in group II.<br />
IOP rise was observed in 7/35 eyes in group I<br />
which could be controlled in all patients with<br />
medication within 2-4 weeks. No significant rise<br />
was observed in group II patients. Patients from<br />
both groups experienced minimal<br />
subconjunctival haemorrhage, foreign body<br />
sensation, hyperemia, and vitreous floaters for<br />
few days following intravitreal injection. No<br />
serious sight threatening adverse effects were<br />
observed.<br />
Intravitreal Triamcinolone acetonide is more<br />
effective as compared to Bevacizumab in Cystoid<br />
Macular Edema associated with DRP and Retinal<br />
venous occlusion.<br />
Discussion<br />
The conventional agent for intravitreal use in<br />
Macular edema due to abnormal increased<br />
vascular permeability in retinal vascular<br />
pathologies has been Triamcinolone. Anecdotal<br />
evidence has shown rapid resolution of the<br />
macular edema but not without side effects such<br />
as raised intraocular pressure and progression of<br />
cataract and short coming of recurrence. 14,15,16,17<br />
Bevacizumab is being tried for similar indications<br />
in view of its effects on vessel permeability and<br />
1. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of<br />
diffuse diabetic macular edema in an <strong>India</strong>n<br />
population. <strong>India</strong>n J Ophthalmol. 2007;55:451-5.<br />
2. (ISSN: 0002-93943), Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:864-<br />
71.<br />
3. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of<br />
macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion: a<br />
short-term study. Retina 2006;26:279-84.<br />
4. Intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) for central and<br />
hemicentral retinal vein occlusions: Retina<br />
2007;27:141-9.<br />
5. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in the treatment<br />
of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein.<br />
Retina 2007;27:419-25.<br />
6. Intravitreal triamcinolone versus bevacizumab for<br />
treatment of refractory diabetic macular oedema<br />
(IBEME study). Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:76-80.<br />
7. Comparative Therapy Evaluation of Intravitreal<br />
Bevacizumab and Triamcinolone Acetonide on<br />
Persistent Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema. Am J<br />
Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar 5.<br />
8. Rosenfeld PJ, Fung AE, Puliafito CA. Optical<br />
coherence tomography findings after an intravitreal<br />
injection of bevacizumab (Avastin) for macular<br />
References<br />
neo-vascularisation and has shown dramatic<br />
effects translating into anatomical and functional<br />
improvement 1,2,3,4,5 but have been studied over<br />
short term, is not without recurrence over<br />
periods of weeks to months 18 and needs careful<br />
approach. There also have been studies<br />
comparing the two molecules for these<br />
indications and its observed that Triamcinolone<br />
is more effective than Bevacizumab in remitting<br />
macular edema associated with diabetic<br />
retinopathy. 6,7 Our observation has been that<br />
Bevacizumab is not as effective as Triamcinolone<br />
as primary treatment of cystoid macular edema<br />
in cases of diabetic retinopathy and retinal<br />
venous occlusion. This might be due to wider<br />
spectrum of effects of steroids and hints towards<br />
alternative VEGF independent factors attributing<br />
to macular edema in Diabetic Retinopathy 1 and<br />
similarly Retinal vascular occlusions. <strong>All</strong> the<br />
same, both agents show significant improvement<br />
1-5, 8, 10-17<br />
in macular edema and probably best<br />
tailored for use according to different stages of<br />
pathologies, Triamcinolone in early stages with<br />
macular edema, before neovascularisation sets in;<br />
and Bevacizumab in cases showing macular<br />
edema with neovascular component.<br />
edema from central retinal vein occlusion.<br />
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005;36:336-9.<br />
9. Schwartz SG, Hickey M, Puliafito CA. Bilateral<br />
CRAO and CRVO from thrombotic<br />
thrombocytopenic purpura: OCT findings and<br />
treatment with triamcinolone acetonide and<br />
bevacizumab. Ophthlamic Surg Lasers Imaging.<br />
2006;37:420-2.<br />
10. Iturralde D, Spaide RF, Meyerle CB, et al.<br />
Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of<br />
macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion: a<br />
short-term study. Retina 2006;26:279-84.<br />
11. Pai SA, Shetty R, Vijayan PB, et al. Clinical,<br />
anatomic, and electrophysiologic evaluation<br />
following intravitreal bevacizumab for macular<br />
edema in retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol.<br />
2007;143:601-6.<br />
12. Spandau UH, Ihloff AK, Jonas JB. Intravirreal<br />
bevacizumab treatment of macular oedema due to<br />
central retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol<br />
Scand. 2006;84:555-6.<br />
13. Stahl A, Agostini H, Hansen LL, Feltgen N.<br />
Bevacizumab in retinal vein occlusion -- results of a<br />
prospective case series. Graefes Arch Clin Exp<br />
Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar 14.
524 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
14. Park CH, Jaffe GJ, Fekrat S. Intravitreal<br />
triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with cystoid<br />
macular edema associated with central retinal vein<br />
occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:419-25.<br />
15. Williamson TH, O'Donnell A. Intravitreal<br />
triamcinolone acetonide for cystoid macular edema<br />
in nonischemic central retinal vein occlusion. Am J<br />
Ophthalmol. 2005;139:860-6.<br />
16. Cekic O, Chang S, Tseng JJ, et al. Intravitreal<br />
triamcinolone treatment for macular edema<br />
associated with central retinal vein occlusion and<br />
hemiretinal vein occlusion. Retina. 2005;25:846-50.<br />
17. Goff MJ, Jumper JM, Yang SS, et al. Intravitreal<br />
triamcinolone acetonide treatment of macular<br />
edema associated with central retinal vein<br />
occlusion. Retina 2006;26:896-901.<br />
18. Matsumoto Y, Freund KB, Peiretti E, et al. Rebound<br />
macular edema following bevacizumab (Avastin)<br />
therapy for retinal venous occlusive disease. Retina<br />
2007;27:426-31.<br />
Diagnostic Role of Optical Coherence Tomography in Diabetic<br />
Maculopathy<br />
Dr. Anshu Goyal, Dr. Mohan Rajan, Dr. Vasumathy Vedantham, Dr. Bina John<br />
(Presenting Author: Dr. Anshu Goyal)<br />
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) is a major<br />
cause of visual deterioration in Diabetic<br />
retinopathy. Diagnosis of diabetic macular<br />
edema is best made by slit lamp biomicroscopy<br />
of the posterior pole using a contact lens. It is,<br />
however, insensitive to small changes in retinal<br />
thickness, for example, a subtle CSME is difficult<br />
to appreciate, or small intraretinal cystoid spaces<br />
or subtle epiretinal changes. Fundus Fluorescein<br />
Angiography (FFA) is useful in demonstrating<br />
the leakage of fluid, consequent to the<br />
breakdown of the blood retinal barrier. Simple<br />
leakage on angiogram may not always be<br />
associated with retinal thickening in the macula;<br />
reports suggest that actual macular thickness is<br />
better correlated with loss of visual acuity. It is in<br />
all probability more important in a case of a<br />
doubtful macular ischemia, when the foveal<br />
perfusion is in question.<br />
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides<br />
valuable information about retinal thickness and<br />
extent of retinal edema in DME. It is also helpful<br />
in monitoring the response to treatment in DME<br />
(Laser and/ or Intravitreal Triamcinolone<br />
Acetonide injection). The role of OCT in assessment<br />
and management of diabetic retinopathy<br />
has become significant in understanding the<br />
vitreoretinal relationship and the internal<br />
architecture of the retina. In patients with refractory<br />
DME, Taut posterior hyaloid membrane<br />
(TPHM) is readily recognized by OCT scan. Focal<br />
vitreoretinal adhesions, subfoveal subretinal<br />
fluid, and the axial distribution of fluid in an<br />
edematous macula that cannot be identified on<br />
clinical examination can also be evident on OCT.<br />
In this study, we aim to find out the topographic<br />
distribution of OCT pattern in DME and to<br />
evaluate the role of OCT as a primary<br />
investigational tool in DME.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
A retrospective review of the medical records of<br />
138 eyes of 71 patients, who presented to the<br />
retina clinic of Rajan Eye Care Hospital, over a<br />
period of 17 months (January 2007 to May 2008)<br />
and were diagnosed to have diabetic<br />
maculopathy, was performed.<br />
<strong>All</strong> patients of age > 21 years, with a confirmed<br />
diagnosis of DM, and NPDR or PDR with CSME<br />
diagnosed with slit lamp biomicroscopy with<br />
90D lens, or clinically and/or angiographically<br />
confirmed DME in an eye that may have already<br />
received Argon laser treatments were included<br />
in the study. Eyes with active proliferative<br />
retinopathy with vitreous hemorrhage, dense<br />
media haze interfering with acquisition of good<br />
OCT image, any other ocular pathology which<br />
can contribute to reduced visual acuity, macular<br />
edema due to associated condition other than<br />
diabetic retinopathy like central retinal vein<br />
occlusion etc, and those with OCT scans of poor<br />
quality were excluded.<br />
The parameters noted down were ocular and<br />
systemic history, best corrected Snellen’s visual<br />
acuity BCVA(converted to LogMAR equivalents,<br />
for statistical analysis), detailed anterior segment<br />
examination with special reference to the<br />
assessment of lens opacity, Goldmann<br />
Applanation Tonometry, slit lamp<br />
biomicroscopy with 90D lens for macular
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
525<br />
assessment, fundus photography, fluorescein<br />
angiography as needed, and optical coherence<br />
tomography – macular scans. OCT scans were<br />
performed through a dilated pupil by an<br />
experienced ocular photographer, on a Stratus<br />
OCT (Humphrey Zeiss, Inc., San Leandro, CA).<br />
OCT scan was used to examine the retinal<br />
thickness, and topographic pattern of the macula.<br />
Central macular thickness as measured by the<br />
automated retinal thickness software algorithm<br />
built into the OCT scanner was noted. In<br />
addition, all the scans were graded and classified<br />
into three groups based on the presence of<br />
specific morphologic patterns, identified on the<br />
basis of their unique appearance on OCT<br />
imaging:<br />
1. Diffuse, sponge like retinal thickening:<br />
increased retinal thickness (defined as greater<br />
than 180 µm) with reduced intraretinal<br />
reflectivity, especially in the outer retinal<br />
layers<br />
2. Cystoid macular edema CME: localization of<br />
intraretinal cystoid spaces that appeared as<br />
round or oval areas of low reflectivity with<br />
highly reflective septa separating the cystoid<br />
like cavities<br />
3. Taut posterior hyaloid membrane TPHM: a<br />
highly reflective signal arising from the inner<br />
retinal surface and extending towards the<br />
optic nerve or peripherally.<br />
Pattern which was most predominant in most of<br />
the scan area was taken into consideration.<br />
Presence of subretinal fluid SRF was also noted –<br />
defined as an accumulation of subretinal fluid<br />
(which appeared dark) beneath a highly<br />
reflective elevation, resembling the dome of the<br />
detached retina.<br />
The clinical and functional status of the patient<br />
and the eye was masked while evaluating the<br />
OCT scans. Data were analyzed to determine the<br />
relationship between retinal thickness and visual<br />
acuity in each of the OCT pattern groups.<br />
Results<br />
The mean duration of diabetes (measured upto<br />
the time of OCT evaluation scan) was 12.68 ± 6.63<br />
years (ranging from 1year to 30 year). The mean<br />
age of the study group was 59.4 ± 9.3 years<br />
(ranging from 41 years to 83 years). Class I i.e.<br />
Diffuse, sponge like retinal thickening was the<br />
most common pattern seen. This pattern was<br />
observed in 79 (58.96%) patients. CME pattern<br />
was seen in 34.58% and TPHM in 7.45% of the<br />
patients.<br />
Mean Central Macular Thickness - As compared<br />
to normal central macular thickness values<br />
(CMT) (150 to 200µm), mean CMT was increased<br />
in all the patients and varied depending on the<br />
OCT pattern of DME. The mean CMT, for the<br />
entire study group was 318.6 ± 130.28µm, (range<br />
146 to 847 µm). Class <strong>III</strong> (TPHM) had the<br />
maximum mean CMT of 492.9 ± 156.5 µm, (244-<br />
847 µm), while class I had the least of 256.59 ±<br />
88.58 µm.<br />
Mean Visual Acuity - Mean BCVA (in log MAR<br />
units) for all the patients was 0.429 ± 0.397,<br />
(approximate Snellen equivalent ~ 6/18) (range<br />
0 to 1.5 logMAR units). It also varied within the<br />
subgroups: class I (Sponge like retinal thickening)<br />
correlated with best mean visual acuity: 0.298 ±<br />
0.327 logMAR units, (~ 6/12), as compared to the<br />
worst visual acuity in class <strong>III</strong> (TPHM): 0.714<br />
±0.401 logMAR units, (~ 6/36).<br />
Three variables were associated with bad visual<br />
acuity:<br />
1. Increasing macular thickness<br />
2. Cystoid macular edema<br />
3. Taut posterior hyaloid membrane<br />
Visual Acuity Vs Central Macular Thickness - In<br />
examining the relationship between BCVA and<br />
CMT, the correlation analysis revealed that;<br />
BCVA increased by 0.13 logMAR units per 100<br />
µm increase in central macular thickness,<br />
(reduction of Snellen visual acuity from 20/20 to<br />
~ 20/30) in the whole group, as well as in the<br />
CME group i.e. Class II.<br />
In class I, BCVA increased by 0.08 logMAR units<br />
per 100 µm increase in central macular thickness,<br />
(reduction of Snellen visual acuity from 20/20 to<br />
~ 20/25). Thus in the setting of sponge like retinal<br />
thickness in diabetic macular edema, a high<br />
macular thickness is usually not associated with<br />
bad visual acuity.<br />
This relationship could not be analyzed in class<br />
<strong>III</strong> because of lack of enough number of patients.<br />
Cystoid Macular Edema And Subretinal Fluid -<br />
Out of 45 patients with CME, 9 patients had<br />
concurrent subfoveal subretinal fluid. Within this<br />
group, 36 patients had isolated CME, with a
526 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
mean central macular thickness of 364 µm as<br />
compared to 478 µm in those with coexistent SRF.<br />
Visual acuity (in logMAR units) was 0.61<br />
logMAR units in isolated CME group; and 0.44<br />
logMAR units in CME with SRF group.<br />
Discussion<br />
A complete and precise characterization of<br />
macular edema based on the OCT data along<br />
with the conventional examination methods, can<br />
be obtained in eyes with diabetic macular edema.<br />
Each of the topographic pattern subtype on OCT<br />
may represent a distinct entity that requires<br />
specific treatment regimen. OCT can thus help us<br />
to prognosticate and optimize the treatment<br />
regimen in each case, in the light of recent<br />
developments in therapeutic modalities.<br />
Although our study suggests relationship<br />
between morphologic pattern and visual acuity,<br />
further investigation and longitudinal studies are<br />
required to establish the role of OCT as a primary<br />
diagnostic tool in DME.<br />
Use of Pascal Parameters in Conventional Lasers<br />
Dr. Kavitha S. Rao, Dr. Hemantha Murthy, Dr. N.S. Muralidhar<br />
(Presenting Author: Dr. Hemantha Murthy)<br />
Pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP) is the<br />
standard treatment procedure for patients<br />
with proliferative diabetic retinopathy according<br />
to diabetic retinopathy study (DRS) and Early<br />
treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS)<br />
and in central retinal vein occlusion with anterior<br />
segment neovascularisation. Many patients find<br />
PRP a painful experience, and when this is<br />
heightened, may lead to significant undertreatment.<br />
2,3,4<br />
The PASCAL (Pattern Scan Laser) photo<br />
coagulator introduced in 2006, uses 532 nm laser<br />
with altered parameters and has shown<br />
improved safety, reduction in pain, and reduced<br />
treatment time compared to a conventional laser.<br />
Our study was designed to evaluate whether<br />
shorter duration exposures of the same<br />
wavelength i.e. 532 nm are more comfortable<br />
than conventional laser settings, while still<br />
providing the same effect.<br />
To study the efficacy of different laser parameters<br />
in pan retinal photocoagulation, and to prove the<br />
therapeutic efficacy of the conventional laser<br />
with PASCAL parameter settings, in terms of<br />
regression of new vessels at the end of the three<br />
sittings of PRP, and patient comfort in terms of<br />
reduced pain and duration of treatment.<br />
Prospective, non-randomized comparative pilot<br />
study.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
This study was performed on 20 eyes of 10<br />
patients, undergoing bilateral PRP for the first<br />
time and in 2 eyes of 2 patients requiring PRP<br />
in one eye.<br />
In 11 patients, the diagnosis was proliferative<br />
diabetic retinopathy and in 1 patient the<br />
diagnosis was central retinal vein occlusion with<br />
neovascular glaucoma. Informed consent was<br />
taken from each of the patients. <strong>All</strong> patients<br />
underwent scatter PRP in 3 sittings at 1 week<br />
interval. Procedure was done using Mainster<br />
and quadraspheric lenses, with coupling solution<br />
and topical anaesthetic.<br />
One eye of the 10 patients requiring bilateral PRP<br />
was treated with green laser with 100 msecs<br />
duration ( conventional laser parameter group,<br />
CLP), the fellow eye was treated with 50 msecs<br />
duration ( reduced duration laser, RDL).<br />
2 patients requiring PRP in one eye underwent<br />
the first sitting with 100 msecs duration and the<br />
next 2 sittings with 50 msecs duration. Results<br />
were compared in terms of efficacy, power<br />
requirement, duration of procedure, pain and<br />
adverse events. Patients were followed up at 1<br />
month and 3 months.<br />
Efficacy was good laser reaction, signs of<br />
regression of neovascularisation at 3 months<br />
follow up. Pain was graded by patients on a scale<br />
of 0 – 4 (0 = no pain, 1 = occasional pain during<br />
procedure, 2 = mild pain, not requiring analgesic,<br />
3 = pain requiring analgesic, 4 = excessive pain<br />
necessitating stopping the procedure).<br />
Results<br />
In CLP group 1(100m sec), average power<br />
required was 220 mW with Mainster lens, and<br />
286.3 mW with quadraspheric lens. In RDL
<strong>RETINA</strong>/ <strong>VITREOUS</strong> <strong>SESSION</strong>-<strong>III</strong><br />
527<br />
group (50m sec), average power was 241.8 mW<br />
with Mainster and 320 mW with quadraspheric<br />
lens.<br />
In the CLP group the average duration of<br />
procedure was 12.2 minutes and in the RDL<br />
group was 9.4 minutes.<br />
The pain graded was 3.7 in the CLP group and<br />
2.5 in the RDL group. Patient comfort was better<br />
in the RDL group.<br />
In our study, although there was a significant<br />
difference in the power used in CLP and RDL<br />
groups, it did not result in any complications.<br />
This may be due to the reduced laser energy per<br />
burn reaching the deeper layers of the eye<br />
secondary to its shorter duration. There was no<br />
choroidal detachment noticed at any time.<br />
There were no adverse events seen in our study<br />
except for the single peripheral pop that occurred<br />
in one patient in the RDL group.<br />
Discussion<br />
The use of lasers to treat retinal diseases dates<br />
back to the 1960’s. 5 Recent studies 9 have shown<br />
the need to optimize thermally induced<br />
therapeutic effect but with minimal retinal<br />
damage. Laser tissue interaction is influenced by<br />
wavelength, spot size, power, and exposure time.<br />
Retinal damage can be reduced by changing<br />
some of these parameters.<br />
Fluence is the factor taken into account for the<br />
PASCAL laser and is calculated by<br />
Power X time<br />
Area: Provided the spot size remains unchanged,<br />
the burn duration of 50 msecs has less fluence<br />
than a burn duration of 100 msecs when titrating<br />
to the same burn intensity because of reduced<br />
diffusion of heat. 1<br />
By reducing the duration of pulse, a higher<br />
power is required to achieve similar therapeutic<br />
effect. 7 In our study also the power required was<br />
on the average 33mW more when the duration<br />
was reduced from 100 to 50 msecs. However the<br />
higher power levels required did not result in<br />
any complications. This may be due to the<br />
reduced laser laser energy per burn reaching the<br />
eye secondary to its shorter duration.<br />
While the energy per pulse is reduced, the total<br />
energy delivered to the retina per sitting maybe<br />
the same because more spots must be delivered<br />
to compensate for smaller burns. Longer burns<br />
may cause greater thermal diffusion, resulting in<br />
damage to the nerve fiber layer and spread to the<br />
choroid causing pain. In short pulse durations,<br />
there is minimal diffusion of heat to adjacent<br />
areas, resulting in localized homogenous burns<br />
and less damage to nerve fiber layer and spread<br />
to choroid. This may be the reason for the lesser<br />
pain and greater comfort in patients.<br />
In conventional photocoagulation, a 200 µm spot<br />
will produce a burn with a diameter greater than<br />
200 µm, due to laser spread, but with 50 msec<br />
pulse duration, the burn diameter will be less<br />
than the spot diameter. 5<br />
A study conducted by Obana A et al has shown<br />
a narrow safety margin between retinal burn and<br />
retinal haemorrhage for pulse durations less than<br />
50 msecs. 7 Point of change from thermo<br />
mechanical cavitation induced RPE damage to<br />
pure thermal RPE denaturation of tissue is the<br />
primary retinal damage mechanism. 8 In our<br />
study we did not observe any retinal hemorrhage<br />
in any patient.<br />
Al Hussainy et al have conducted a study with<br />
20 msecs duration and have found significantly<br />
reduced pain during procedure. Shorter<br />
duration laser burns may be less painful due to<br />
rapid cool off of the treated tissue compared to<br />
longer duration burn. 4 This is also the principle<br />
behind the micropulse laser delivery in which<br />
pain can be markedly reduced. Hence simple<br />
reduction of the exposure time and increasing the<br />
power of conventional lasers can increase patient<br />
comfort while achieving comparable efficacy.<br />
PASCAL laser is an attractive option for the painfree,<br />
fast, easy way of laser delivery for PRP. The<br />
same efficacy can be achieved in a conventional<br />
laser by altering the parameters. Shorter pulse<br />
duration in conventional laser is comparable in<br />
efficacy to longer pulse duration and is more<br />
comfortable and painless for the patient. Benefits<br />
of PASCAL laser can thus be achieved by<br />
alteration of parameters of conventional laser.<br />
Ours, being a pilot study, the follow-up was only<br />
of 3 months duration. A larger study with a<br />
longer follow up would determine, if reduction<br />
of duration is also beneficial to the patient in<br />
terms of lesser field loss and complications.
528 AIOC 2009 PROCEEDINGS<br />
1. Blumenkranz MS, Yellachich D, Anderssen D.<br />
Semiautomated patterned scanning laser for retinal<br />
photocoagulation. Retina 2006;26:370-6.<br />
2. Royal college of anaesthetists and the Royal college<br />
of Ophthalmologists. Local anaesthesia for<br />
Intraocular Surgery. RCA, RCOphth: London, 2001.<br />
3. Vaideanu D, Taylor P,K McAndrew P, Hildreth A,<br />
Deady JP, Steel DH et al. Double masked<br />
randomized controlled trial to assess the<br />
effectiveness of paracetamol in reducing pain in<br />
PRP. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:713.<br />
4. S Al-Hussainy, PM Dodson and JM Gibson. Pain<br />
response and follow-up of patients undergoing PRP<br />
with reduced exposure times. Eye 2008;22:96-9.<br />
5. Jain A, Blumenkranz MS, Paulus Y et al. Effect of<br />
pulse duration on size and character of the lesion in<br />
References<br />
retinal photocoagulation. Arch Ophthal. 2008:126:78-<br />
85.<br />
6. Sanghvi et al. Initial experience with Pascal<br />
photogoagulation. A pilot study of 75 procedures.<br />
Eye 2008;22:96-9.<br />
7. Obana A, Lorenz B, et al. Therapeutic range of<br />
chorioretinal photocoagulation with diode and<br />
argon lasers : an experimental comparison. Laser<br />
Light Ophthalmol 1992:4:147-56.<br />
8. Schuele G, Rumohr et al. RPE damage thresholds<br />
and mechanisms for laser exposure in the<br />
microsecond to millisecond time regimen. Invest<br />
Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005:46:714-19.<br />
9. Dorin G. Evolution of retinal laser therapy (MIP).<br />
Can laser heal the retina without harming it? Semin<br />
Ophthalmol 2004;19:62-8.