01.11.2014 Views

hadronic mathematics, mechanics and chemistry - Institute for Basic ...

hadronic mathematics, mechanics and chemistry - Institute for Basic ...

hadronic mathematics, mechanics and chemistry - Institute for Basic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HADRONIC MATHEMATICS, MECHANICS AND CHEMISTRY 21<br />

systems predict the existence of new clean energies <strong>and</strong> fuels that are prohibited<br />

by the spacetime symmetries of the exterior systems.<br />

As we shall see in Section 1.2.7, Chapter 6 <strong>and</strong> Chapter 12, the assumption that<br />

the undetectable quarks are physical constituents of hadrons prohibits possible<br />

new energy based on processes occurring in the interior of hadrons (rather than<br />

in the interior of their ensembles such as nuclei). On the contrary, the assumption<br />

of <strong>hadronic</strong> constituents that can be fully defined in our spacetime <strong>and</strong> can be<br />

produced free under suitable conditions, directly implies new clean energies.<br />

1.2.7 The Scientific Imbalance Caused by Quark<br />

Conjectures<br />

One of the most important objectives of this monograph, culminating in the<br />

presentation of Chapter 12, is to show that the conjecture that quarks are physical<br />

particles existing in our spacetime constitutes one of the biggest threats to<br />

mankind because it prevents the orderly scientific process of resolving increasingly<br />

cataclysmic environmental problems.<br />

It should be clarified in this respect, as repeatedly stated by the author in his<br />

writings that the unitary, Mendeleev-type, SU(3)-color classification of hadron<br />

into families can be reasonably considered as having a final character (see e.g.,<br />

Ref. [99] <strong>and</strong> papers quoted therein), in view of the historical capability of said<br />

classification to predict several new particles whose existence was subsequently<br />

verified experimentally. All doubts herein considered solely refer to the joint use<br />

of the same classification models as providing the structure of each individual<br />

element of a given <strong>hadronic</strong> family (<strong>for</strong> more details, see memoirs [100,101] <strong>and</strong><br />

preprint [102] <strong>and</strong> Chapter 6).<br />

Far from being alone, this author has repeatedly expressed the view that quarks<br />

cannot be physical constituents of hadrons existing in our spacetime <strong>for</strong> numerous<br />

independent reasons.<br />

On historical grounds, the study of nuclei, atoms <strong>and</strong> molecules required two<br />

different models, one <strong>for</strong> the classification <strong>and</strong> a separate one <strong>for</strong> the structure<br />

of the individual elements of a given SU(3)-color family. Quark theories depart<br />

from this historical teaching because of their conception to represent with one<br />

single theory both the classification <strong>and</strong> the structure of hadrons.<br />

As an example, the idea that the Mendeleev classification of atoms could jointly<br />

provide the structure of each individual atom of a given valence family is outside<br />

the boundary of science. The Mendeleev classification was essentially achieved<br />

via classical theories, while the underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the atomic structure required<br />

the construction of a new theory, quantum <strong>mechanics</strong>.<br />

Independently from the above dichotomy classification vs structure, it is well<br />

known by specialists, but rarely admitted, that quarks are purely mathematical<br />

quantities, being purely mathematical representations of a purely mathematical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!