hadronic mathematics, mechanics and chemistry - Institute for Basic ...

HADRONIC MATHEMATICS, MECHANICS AND CHEMISTRY 31
for the unspoken, but transparent and pre-meditated intent of maintaining the
dominance of Einsteinian doctrines in physics.
At any rate, experimental data are elaborated via the conventional scattering
theory that, even though impeccable for electromagnetic interactions among pointlike
particles, is fundamentally insufficient for a serious representation of the
scattering among extended, nonspherical and hyperdense hadrons (Figure 1.2 and
Chapter 3).
As a matter of fact, serious scholars and, above all, future historians, should
focus their main attention on the fact that the climax of unscientific conduct
by organized interests on Einsteinian doctrines occurs primarily in the manipulation
of experiments, beginning with the control of the conditions of funding,
then following with the control of the conduction of the experiments and, finally,
with the control of the theoretical elaboration of the data to make sure that the
orchestrated compliance with Einsteinian doctrines occurs at all levels.
Among an unreassuringly excessive number of cases existing in the literature,
some of which are reviewed in Chapter 6, a representative case is that of the Bose-
Einstein correlation in which protons and antiprotons collide at high energy by
annihilating each other and forming the so-called “fireball”, that, in turn, emits a
large number of unstable particles whose final product is a number of correlated
mesons (see, e.g., review [7] and Figure 1.7).
The simplest possible case is that of the two-points correlation function
C 2 = P (p 1, p 2 )
P (p 1 ) × P (p 2 ) , (1.2.14)
where p 1 and p 2 are the linear momenta of the two mesons and the P ’s represent
their probabilities.
By working out the calculations via unadulterated axioms of relativistic quantum
mechanics one obtains expressions of the type
C 2 = 1 + A × e −Q 12
− B × e −Q 12
, (1.2.15)
where A and B are normalization parameters and Q 12 is the momentum transfer.
This expression is dramatically far from representing experimental data, as shown
in Chapter 5.
To resolve the problem, supporters of the universal validity of quantum mechanics
and special relativity then introduce four arbitrary parameters of unknown
physical origin and motivation called “chaoticity parameters” c µ , µ =
1, 2, 3, 4, and expand expression (1.2.15) into the form
C 2 = 1 + A × e −Q 12/c 1
+ B × e −Q 12/c 2
+ C × e −Q 12/c 3
− D × e −Q 12/c 4
, (1.2.16)
which expression does indeed fit the experimental data, as we shall see. However,
the claim that quantum mechanics and special relativity are exactly valid is a
scientific deception particularly when proffered by experts.