02.11.2014 Views

Ph.D. THESIS Multipolar ordering in f-electron systems

Ph.D. THESIS Multipolar ordering in f-electron systems

Ph.D. THESIS Multipolar ordering in f-electron systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2 Overview of the Theoretical Background 17<br />

parameters act<strong>in</strong>g on the doublet (2.15) are<br />

|Γ + 3 〉〈Γ + 3 | − |Γ − 3 〉〈Γ − 3 | ∼ O 0 2 (2.20)<br />

|Γ + 3 〉〈Γ − 3 | + |Γ − 3 〉〈Γ + 3 | ∼ O 2 2 (2.21)<br />

i [ |Γ − 3 〉〈Γ + 3 | − |Γ + 3 〉〈Γ − 3 | ] ∼ T xyz . (2.22)<br />

By constructions, O2 0 and O2 2 are real operators, i.e., they are time reversal<br />

<strong>in</strong>variant, while T xyz is an imag<strong>in</strong>ary operator, i.e., it is time-reversal-odd.<br />

This corresponds to the def<strong>in</strong>ition of the order parameters used <strong>in</strong> Table 2.3.<br />

One may th<strong>in</strong>k that higher order multipoles are irrelevant because their<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction is much weaker than ord<strong>in</strong>ary dipolar <strong>in</strong>teraction. This seems to<br />

be suggested by the multipole expansion <strong>in</strong> classical electrodynamics. This<br />

is, however, mislead<strong>in</strong>g. The lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teraction term between the multipoles<br />

has quantum mechanical orig<strong>in</strong>, it is mediated by the conduction <strong>electron</strong>s<br />

like the usual exchange <strong>in</strong>teraction. Based on symmetry consideration we<br />

can tell the possible order parameters, but we may pose the question: which<br />

multipolar moment will order? It depends on microscopic details of the<br />

system which multipolar <strong>in</strong>teraction will be relevant. In the next Section we<br />

discuss the nature of the <strong>in</strong>teractions between the multipoles.<br />

2.4 Interactions Between the Multipoles<br />

We saw that the s<strong>in</strong>gle-site ionic degrees of freedom are <strong>in</strong> general highly<br />

reduced at low temperatures, but usually not all of them are quenched, and<br />

the static magnetic behavior depends on the ion-ion <strong>in</strong>teractions. The ground<br />

state usually an ordered state which is a consequence of the <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />

The first attempt to understand the magnetic behavior was the Heisenberg<br />

exchange Hamiltonian<br />

H exch = JS 1 · S 2 (2.23)<br />

where S 1 and S 2 are the sp<strong>in</strong>s of two ions and J is the sp<strong>in</strong>-sp<strong>in</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

constant. The effective coupl<strong>in</strong>g between the sp<strong>in</strong>s may arise from either<br />

direct exchange, or superexchange, or from RKKY-type <strong>in</strong>direct exchange.<br />

However, the sp<strong>in</strong>-only form (2.23) can be used for d-<strong>electron</strong> <strong>systems</strong><br />

only for which the orbital degrees of freedom are quenched. In f-<strong>electron</strong><br />

<strong>systems</strong> this Hamiltonian does not work well, because the sp<strong>in</strong> exchange is<br />

highly anisotropic, and the <strong>in</strong>teractions between the higher order multipoles<br />

are equally important.<br />

The first <strong>in</strong>teraction type which may come to m<strong>in</strong>d is the classical (direct)<br />

electric and magnetic multipole <strong>in</strong>teractions. The direct dipole-dipole

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!