1986 - The Exon Library

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$P\C[P DATE[6-21-94 AUTH - The Exon Library$

DPC Vote Database ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Vote No. 18 SR 28 02/20/86 CQ Admin: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Senate TV Coverage (S. Res. 28) Dole-Byrd, et al., motion to recommit bill with instructions to report back forthwith with changes in Senate Rules to be effective during period for radio and TV coverage of Senate proceedings ending July 25: raises number necessary to invoke cloture to 67 members for changes in rules and two-thirds of those present and voting (instead of 60) for all other matters and reduces debate cap after cloture is invoked from 100 hours to 20 hours; reduces three-day rule on availability of reports to two days, including Saturdays; limits debate to two hours on motions to bring up bills other than Rules changes; requires that copy of conference report be available on all Senators' desks before bringing it up; creates germaneness motion that no amendment, other than reported committee amendment, shall be in order unless germane and relevant, which becomes effective upon affirmative vote of 60 Senators; and expedites treaty consideration by eliminating Committee of Whole proceedings. Motion to Recommit Agreed to (81-9) Yeas (81) Democrats (40 or 95%) Baucus, Bentsen, Bingaman, Boren, Bradley, Bumpers, Burdick, Byrd, Chiles, Cranston, DeConcini, Dixon, Dodd, Ford, Gore, Harkin, Hart, Heflin, Hollings, Kennedy, Kerry, Lautenberg, Leahy, Levin, Long, Matsunaga, Melcher, Metzenbaum, Mitchell, Moynihan, Nunn, Pell, Pryor, Riegle, Rockefeller, Sarbanes, Sasser, Simon, Stennis, Zorinsky Republicans (41 or 85%) Abdnor, Andrews, Armstrong, Chafee, Cochran, D'Amato, Danforth, Denton, Dole, Domenici, East, Evans, Garn, Goldwater, Gorton, Gramm, Hatch, Hatfield, Hawkins, Heinz, Kassebaum, Kasten, Lugar, Mattingly, McConnell, Murkowski, Nickles, Packwood, Pressler, Quayle, Roth, Rudman, Simpson, Specter, Stafford, Stevens, Thurmond, Trible, Warner, Weicker, Wilson Nays (9) Democrats (2 or 5%) Eagleton, Proxmire Republicans (7 or 15%) Boschwitz, Durenberger, Grassley, Hecht, Helms, Laxalt, Wallop
Not Voting (10) Democrats (5) Biden-2, <strong>Exon</strong>-3, Glenn-2, Inouye-4, Johnston-2 Republicans (5) Cohen-2, Humphrey-2, Mathias-1, McClure-2, Symms-2 Office Note (no text) Description Proponents pointed out that recommittal was necessary in order for the two rules changes regarding the motion to proceed and germaneness to be considered by the Senate without their being ruled out of order as nongermane in the event cloture is invoked on this resolution. Many stated they voted for the motion, even though they did not favor every or possibly any of the rules changes. Some felt that adding a package of rules changes would make it more difficult for gavel-to-gavel television coverage to be adopted, because it added more issues of controversy. Others insisted this package provided the basis for a workable resolution of the matter. Opponents made no statements.
Page 1 and 2: DPC Vote Database -----------------
Page 13: DPC Vote Database -----------------
Page 16 and 17: shortchange Conrail workers by near
Page 30 and 31: enumerated in article III. Article
Page 56 and 57: as President has yet to submit a ba
Page 58 and 59: unworkable Constitutional amendment
Page 60 and 61: equire significant expenditures to
Page 80 and 81: of 10 to 5, noted Mr. Fitzwater's B
Page 84 and 85:
DPC Vote Database -----------------
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
they admitted, but, in conjunction
Page 96 and 97:
exhausted the possibilities for a n
Page 98 and 99:
Act because that law was drafted to
Page 100 and 101:
Description Proponents asserted tha
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Proponents of the amendment asserte
Page 106 and 107:
Proponents of the amendment stated
Page 108 and 109:
Description Proponents of the subst
Page 110 and 111:
Description Proponents pointed out
Page 112 and 113:
communities in the National flight
Page 114 and 115:
Proponents of the amendment declare
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Makes necessary changes to the Wash
Page 132 and 133:
Natural resources, such as the fore
Page 134 and 135:
The Hobbs Act, commonly referred to
Page 136 and 137:
unduly restrictive provisions of th
Page 138 and 139:
WÆ(%ØëmS-ë•õ>òo¨#(ZŠãçf
Page 140 and 141:
RuCÆ
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
State in which the project is locat
Page 154 and 155:
Description Proponents pointed out
Page 156 and 157:
Since 1980, Federal funding for edu
Page 158 and 159:
Proponents of the amendment asserte
Page 160 and 161:
investment--not a cost--of $200 mil
Page 162 and 163:
immunization program has one of the
Page 164 and 165:
Proponents of the amendment pointed
Page 166 and 167:
amount but would serve notice that
Page 168 and 169:
etraining, and basic research. It w
Page 170 and 171:
more worthwhile purpose--to find cu
Page 172 and 173:
increases for Superfund cleanup and
Page 174 and 175:
program designed to assist recipien
Page 176 and 177:
Proponents stated that while legisl
Page 178 and 179:
Description Proponents noted that t
Page 180 and 181:
Deficit 144.0 110.1 72.1 COLAs/Fede
Page 182 and 183:
aerospace industry. Dr. Fletcher is
Page 184 and 185:
671 AIM-9P4 Sidewinder air-to-air m
Page 186 and 187:
sophistication and destructive powe
Page 188 and 189:
a discussion of the relationship of
Page 190 and 191:
commands are responsible to the Pre
Page 192 and 193:
the Infant Formula Act of 1980 to e
Page 194 and 195:
extensive testing prior to approval
Page 196 and 197:
have had some basic clinical trials
Page 198 and 199:
ill provides no real protection sin
Page 200 and 201:
Proponents of the amendment noted t
Page 202 and 203:
and record certain serious safety p
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
the overall reduction in future mil
Page 208 and 209:
have stated they do not intend to b
show all

1986 - The Exon Library

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?