03.11.2014 Views

Syllabus Syntax I LING-GA 1310-001 Instructor - NYU > Department ...

Syllabus Syntax I LING-GA 1310-001 Instructor - NYU > Department ...

Syllabus Syntax I LING-GA 1310-001 Instructor - NYU > Department ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Syllabus</strong> <strong>Syntax</strong> I <strong>LING</strong>-<strong>GA</strong> <strong>1310</strong>-<strong>001</strong><br />

<strong>Instructor</strong>: Professor Chris Collins<br />

Office: 10 Washington Place, Room 411<br />

E-Mail: cc116@nyu.edu<br />

Phone: 28763<br />

Time: TR, 2:00PM- 3:15PM<br />

Place: 10Washington Place, Room 103<br />

Office Hours: Wednesday 10-12 (or by appointment)<br />

Course Description:<br />

<strong>Syntax</strong> I and II together form a comprehensive introduction to the concepts and principles<br />

of syntactic theory, in the framework of Principles and Parameters and Minimalism.<br />

<strong>Syntax</strong> I is concerned with phrase structure, argument structure (unaccusatives, unergatives,<br />

transitives, double object constructions, psych-verbs), Case and agreement (Agree), A-movement<br />

(passives, raising constructions), head movement, binding and control.<br />

<strong>Syntax</strong> II will cover A’-movement, the left periphery, differences between A- and A’-<br />

movement, weak and strong crossover, remnant movement, successive cyclic movement, general<br />

constraints on movement (minimalist conception of phases, relativized minimality), that-trace effects,<br />

the adjunct/argument asymmetry, covert movement (QR, Wh-in situ) and multiple wh-questions.<br />

Emphasis will be on reading the primary literature and writing a research paper.<br />

Course Requirements<br />

Problem Sets<br />

You may work on problem sets together, but all written work must be your own (e.g., you cannot<br />

copy the wording of your classmate and submit it as your own work). There will be around 5<br />

problem sets throughout the semester.<br />

Presentation<br />

Students will form small groups, and each group will give a presentation of a selected paper from<br />

the syllabus.<br />

Final Paper<br />

You may either (a) critically review a paper that has not been discussed in class, or (b) write a<br />

squib. Final papers are due on the last day of class: December 13.<br />

Grading<br />

Attendance and participation 10%<br />

Problem sets/Homework 50%<br />

Presentation in Class 10%<br />

Final Paper 30%<br />

Course Materials<br />

You are not required to purchase any materials for this class. All readings will be posted to our<br />

course website on Blackboard.<br />

1


I have posted the following forthcoming textbook online for people to use as a background<br />

reference.<br />

Koopman, Hilda, Dominique Sportiche, and Ed Stabler (to appear). An Introduction to Syntactic<br />

Analysis and Theory.<br />

Other Useful Resources<br />

Baltin, Mark and Chris Collins. 2<strong>001</strong>. The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Malden,<br />

MA: Blackwell.<br />

Everaert, Martin and Henk van Riemsdijk. 2006. The Blackwell Companion to <strong>Syntax</strong>. Malden,<br />

MA: Blackwell.<br />

Boeckx, Cedric. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford University Press,<br />

Oxford.<br />

Adger, David. 2003. Core <strong>Syntax</strong>: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford.<br />

[Chapters 1-5 posted on Blackboard]<br />

Helpful Links for Syntacticians<br />

Blackwell Linguistic Compass<br />

http://linguistics-compass.com/syntax-morphology/<br />

Lingbuzz (hot new papers on syntax)<br />

http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz<br />

Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (articles relevant to semantics)<br />

http://plato.stanford.edu/<br />

50 Years of Linguistics at MIT (see the videos on syntax and semantics)<br />

http://ling50.mit.edu/<br />

MIT Working Papers in Linguistics<br />

http://mitwpl.mit.edu/<br />

EA<strong>LING</strong> archives (videos and handouts, EA<strong>LING</strong> stands for Ecole d'Automne de Linguistique)<br />

http://ealing.cognition.ens.fr/ealing2012/site/PreviousEalings<br />

The syntax of natural language: An online introduction using the Trees program<br />

Beatrice Santorini , Anthony Kroch<br />

http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~beatrice/syntax-textbook/index.html<br />

World Atlas of Language Structures (online database)<br />

(it can be addictive to start playing with this)<br />

http://wals.info/<br />

Syntactic Structures of the World’s Languages (online database)<br />

http://sswl.railsplayground.net/<br />

The AFRANAPH Project (online database)<br />

http://www.africananaphora.rutgers.edu/<br />

Approaching Islands (syllabus)<br />

http://idiom.ucsd.edu/~goodall/225s11/syllabus<br />

2


<strong>Syllabus</strong>:<br />

Week 1: Sept. 4, 6 Introduction to Course, A Brief History of Generative Grammar,<br />

Properties of Merge<br />

Collins, Chris and Ed Stabler. 2012. A Formalization of Minimalist <strong>Syntax</strong>. Ms., <strong>NYU</strong> and UCLA.<br />

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Chapter 4 in The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press. [excerpt:<br />

pp. 241-249]<br />

Week 2: Sept. 11, 13 IP, CP and Head Movement<br />

Lasnik, Howard. 1995. The Forms of Sentences. An Invitation to Cognitive Science: Language,<br />

Vol. 1. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 283-310.<br />

Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic<br />

Inquiry 20, 3: 365-424. [Selected Pages]<br />

Extra:<br />

Lasnik, Howard and Juan Uriagereka. 2002. On the Poverty of Stimulus Challenge. The Linguistic<br />

Review 19: 147-150.<br />

Roberts, Ian. 2011. Head Movement and the Minimalist Program. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The<br />

Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.<br />

Week 3: Sept. 18, 20 Word Order and Typology<br />

Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of <strong>Syntax</strong>. MIT Press, Cambridge.<br />

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its Exceptions. Linguistic<br />

Inquiry 36.3, pgs. 315-332.<br />

Extra:<br />

Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-Movement in <strong>Syntax</strong><br />

and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 25.4, pgs. 609-665.<br />

Bernstein, Judy. 2<strong>001</strong>. The DP Hypothesis: Identifying Clausal Properties in the Nominal Domain.<br />

In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds.), pp.<br />

536-561.<br />

Bernstein, Judy. 2008. Reformulating the Determiner Phrase Analysis. Language and Linguistics<br />

Compass 2, pgs. 1-25.<br />

Abney, Steven Paul. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Apsect. Doctoral<br />

Dissertation, MIT.<br />

3


Week 4: Sept. 25, 27 Case Theory, Agree and Uninterpretable Features<br />

Pesetsky, David and Esther Torrego. 2011. Case. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of<br />

Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.<br />

Lasnik, Howard and Juan Uriagereka. 1988. A Course in GB <strong>Syntax</strong>. MIT Press, Cambridge.<br />

[Section 1.4] [NOT YET POSTED ON BLACKBOARD]<br />

Extra:<br />

Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1977. Letter to Noam Chomsky and Howard Lasnik.<br />

Legate, Julie. 2008. Morphological and Abstract Case. Linguistic Inquiry 39.1, pgs. 55-101.<br />

Marantz, Alec. 2000. Case and Licensing. In Proceedings of ESCOL, 234–253.<br />

Cornell Linguistics Club. Republished in Reuland (2000), pp. 11–30.<br />

Adger, David. 2010. A Minimalist Theory of Feature Structure. In Kibort and Corbett (eds.),<br />

Features. Oxford University Press, Oxford<br />

Week 5: Oct. 2, 4 Binding Theory: The Basics<br />

Koopman, Hilda, Dominique Sportiche, and Ed Stabler (to appear). An Introduction to Syntactic<br />

Analysis and Theory. [Chapters 7 and 13]<br />

Week 6: Oct. 9, 11 Binding Theory: Reconstruction<br />

Barss, Andrew. 2002. Syntactic Reconstruction Effects. In Baltin and Collins (eds.), The<br />

Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Blackwell.<br />

Huang, C.-T. James. 1993. Reconstruction and the Structure of VP: Some Theoretical<br />

Consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 24.1, pgs. 103-138.<br />

Extra:<br />

Pesetsky, David. 2012. Phrasal Movement and its Discontents: Diseases and Diagnoses. To appear<br />

in Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnostics in <strong>Syntax</strong>, Oxford University Press.<br />

Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent<br />

Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19.3, pgs. 425-449.<br />

McCloskey, Jim. 1997. Subjecthood and Subject Positions. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of<br />

Grammar. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecth.<br />

Week 7: Oct. 16 (Fall Break), 18 Binding Theory: Minimalist Issues<br />

Extra:<br />

4


Reuland, E., 2011. Anaphora and Language Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT. [Chapters: TBA]<br />

[NOT YET POSTED ON BLACKBOARD]<br />

Hornstein, Norbert. 2<strong>001</strong>. Move: A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Blackwell, Oxford. [Chapter<br />

5: Is the Binding Theory Necessary?]<br />

Kayne, Richard. 2002. Pronouns and Their Antecedents. In Samuel David Epstein and T. Daniel<br />

Seely (eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Blackwell, Oxford.<br />

Week 8: Oct. 23, 25 Binding Theory: Pronominal Agreement<br />

Collins, Chris and Paul Postal. 2012. Imposters. MIT Press, Cambridge. [Chapters 1-4, 7]<br />

Extra:<br />

Baker, Mark. 2008. The <strong>Syntax</strong> of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge, England, Cambridge<br />

University Press.<br />

Week 9: Oct. 30, Nov. 1 Raising and Control: The Basics<br />

Koopman, Hilda, Dominique Sportiche, and Ed Stabler (to appear). An Introduction to Syntactic<br />

Analysis and Theory. [Chapter 9: Infinitival Complements: Raising and Control]<br />

Week 10: Nov. 6, 8 Raising and Control: The Debate<br />

Tuesday:<br />

Thursday:<br />

Student Presentation<br />

Student Presentation<br />

Bobaljik, Jonathan David and Idan Landau. 2009. Icelandic Control is not A-Movement: The Case<br />

from Case. Linguistic Inquiry 40, 1: 113-154.<br />

Boeckx, Cedric and Norbert Hornstein. 2004. Movement Under Control. Linguistic Inquiry 35.3,<br />

pgs. 431-452.<br />

Extra:<br />

Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 1: 69-96.<br />

Landau, Idan. 2003. Movement out of Control. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 471-498.<br />

Week 11: Nov. 13, 15 Argument Structure: VP-Shells<br />

Thursday:<br />

Student Presentation<br />

Barss, Andrew and Howard Lasnik. 1986. A Note on Anaphors and Double Objects. Linguistic<br />

Inquiry 17: 347-354.<br />

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 1-64.<br />

5


Extra:<br />

Breuning, Benjamin. 2010. Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives.<br />

Linguistic Inquiry 41.2, pgs. 287-305.<br />

Larson, Richard. 1988. On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-391.<br />

Baker, Mark and Collins Chris. 2006. Linkers and the Internal Structure of the vP. Natural<br />

Language and Linguistic Theory 24, pgs. 307-354.<br />

Week 12: Nov. 20, 22 (Thanksgiving) Catch-Up/Review<br />

Week 13: Nov. 27, 29 Argument Structure: Unergatives, Unaccusatives, Need/Have<br />

Thursday:<br />

Student Presentation<br />

Harley, Heidi. 2011. A Minimalist Approach to Argument Structure. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), The<br />

Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, pgs. 427 – 448. Oxford University Press, Oxford.<br />

Harves, Stephanie and Richard Kayne. 2012. Having Need and Needing Have. Linguistic Inquiry<br />

43.1, pgs. 120-132.<br />

Extra:<br />

Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Chapters 1-2 in Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA:<br />

MIT Press.<br />

Week 14: Dec. 4, 6 Argument Structure: Types of Objects<br />

Postal, Paul. 2010. Edge-Based Clause <strong>Syntax</strong>. MIT Press, Cambridge [Forward and Chapter 2:<br />

Objects and Arrays, pgs. 47 -74] [NOT YET POSTED ON BLACKBOARD]<br />

Extra:<br />

Landau, Idan. 2010. The Locative <strong>Syntax</strong> of Experiencers. MIT Press, Cambridge.<br />

[NOT YET POSTED ON BLACKBOARD]<br />

Week 15: Dec. 11, 13 Passive<br />

Thursday: Student Presentation<br />

Collins, Chris. 2005. A Smuggling Approach to the Passive in English. <strong>Syntax</strong> 8, 2: 81-120.<br />

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. [Selected Sections]<br />

[NOT YET POSTED ON BLACBOARD]<br />

Extra:<br />

Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson and Ian Roberts. 1989. Passive Arguments Raised. Linguistic Inquiry.<br />

20: 219-251.<br />

6


Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck and L. Zaring<br />

(eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 109-137.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!