03.11.2014 Views

Membrane Pre-treatment Using Plate Settlers - Ohiowater.org

Membrane Pre-treatment Using Plate Settlers - Ohiowater.org

Membrane Pre-treatment Using Plate Settlers - Ohiowater.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Membrane</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-<strong>treatment</strong> <strong>Using</strong> <strong>Plate</strong> <strong>Settlers</strong><br />

Joe Brauch<br />

Meurer Research<br />

6270 Joyce Drive<br />

Golden, CO 80403


MEURER RESEARCH, INC.<br />

• Established in 1977 – Has over 35 years experience in<br />

designing clarifiers<br />

• Has been issued over 50 patents related to the<br />

sedimentation process<br />

• MRI has over 500 plate settler installations, more plates<br />

than anyone in the world.<br />

• MRI has manufactured over 4,000 sludge collectors,<br />

more than anyone in the world.


<strong>Plate</strong> <strong>Settlers</strong> in the <strong>Pre</strong>-Treatment Process<br />

•Effective pre-<strong>treatment</strong> will maximize the downstream<br />

processes, i.e. membranes and granular media filters<br />

•Sedimentation is the most popular method of pre<strong>treatment</strong><br />

•The sedimentation process is designed to remove the<br />

majority of settleable solids by gravitational settling


CONVENTIONAL SETTLING BASIN<br />

• Design parameters are that particles moving at velocity V H , starting at the<br />

water surface and falling at a velocity V S must reach the bottom, depth D,<br />

within the basin length L.<br />

• Influent elevation “d” must be used for calculations<br />

• Through calculations, Overflow Velocity (V O ) or Surface Overflow rate (SOR)<br />

can be determined<br />

L<br />

D<br />

d<br />

v S<br />

v H


MANY THINGS AFFECT THE PERFORMANCE OF A<br />

CONVENTIONAL BASIN<br />

• Flow rate changes<br />

• Local climate conditions<br />

o Air and water temperature changes – Water density<br />

o Wind velocity and direction<br />

• Events such as heavy rains<br />

• Inadequate sludge removal


CONVENTIONAL BASIN WITH SLUDGE<br />

ACCUMULATION<br />

•Reduces the size of the basin<br />

•Causes short circuiting


CONVENTIONAL BASIN AS SLUDGE BUILDS UP<br />

EVEN DISTRIBUTION<br />

INTO THE BASIN<br />

HIGHER VELOCITY DOWN<br />

THE BASIN<br />

FLOC CARRYOVER OCCURS<br />

SLUDGE BUILDS UP<br />

RESIDENCE TIME IS<br />

SHORTENED


EVOLUTION OF PLATE SETTLERS<br />

• Allen Hazen’s 1904 paper marked the beginning of<br />

modern sedimentation theory with the notion that a<br />

basin should be shallow therefore reducing the effects<br />

of hydraulic factors.<br />

• This was later advocated by Camp and the theory of the<br />

“tray settler” was born.


The problem was sludge removal from a horizontal tray.<br />

The answer was found by tilting the plates<br />

(trays) which resulted in the velocity vectors<br />

within the plate settler as we know it today<br />

3.5"<br />

Vg<br />

55 0


SETTLED SOLIDS EVACUATION<br />

Camp determined that settled solids accumulate into a mass.<br />

When the weight of the mass exceeds the shear resistance of the<br />

plate surface the mass slides down the 55 0 angle and off of the<br />

plate as a clump.<br />

The settled solids<br />

accumulate as a mass<br />

The weight of the mass<br />

exceeds the shear<br />

resistance and breaks<br />

away


<strong>Plate</strong><br />

Cartridges<br />

Feed Channels<br />

Flow Control<br />

Decks<br />

Stainless Steel Support Beam<br />

Sludge Collection


ADVANTAGES OF PLATE SETTLERS<br />

1. The settling distance is reduced by 98%, 3.5” compared to<br />

15’ in a conventional basin<br />

2. <strong>Plate</strong> settlers provide a “perfect environment” low<br />

velocities and minimized hydraulic effects<br />

3. Effects from wind, turbidity spikes and temperatures are<br />

minimized<br />

4. <strong>Plate</strong> settlers “overlap” therefore basin footprints are 20%<br />

as large as a conventional basin<br />

5. Effluent turbidities are


<strong>Plate</strong> settlers are set on 55 0 angle<br />

Falling particles see the<br />

“Projected Area” of each<br />

plate settler<br />

The loading rate is the rate of<br />

flow over the projected areas<br />

i.e. .3 gpm/ft 2<br />

The Projected Areas<br />

overlap<br />

The settling surface is<br />

much larger without plate<br />

settlers


Determine the horizontal projected area needed<br />

1. Choose the specific loading rate. For example a standard<br />

loading rate is 0.3 gpm/ft 2 of effective plate area at 90%<br />

efficiency.<br />

Calculations for 10 MGD (6950 GPM) example:<br />

Divide the flow in gpm by the loading rate:<br />

Flow = 6,950 = 23,166 ft 2 = projected area<br />

the Loading rate .3 GPM/ft 2<br />

Apply the efficiency<br />

SIZING CALCULATION EXAMPLE<br />

2. Divide the projected area by the efficiency – 90%<br />

Projected area = 23,166 ft 2<br />

efficiency .9<br />

= 25,740 ft 2 effective area


Convert the horizontal projected area to<br />

55 0 plate angle<br />

3. Divide the effective area by .574 (COS of 55 0 )<br />

to convert the surface area to 55 0<br />

25,740 ft 2 = 44,843 ft 2 of actual plate surface<br />

.574<br />

Convert the plate area to number of plate<br />

settlers<br />

4. Divide the actual plates surface area by the<br />

area of each plate (i.e. 45 ft 2 )<br />

44,843 ft 2 = 997 plates for 10 mgd<br />

45 ft 2


SITE INSTALLATION PROCESS<br />

Beams installed & <strong>Plate</strong>s are set into<br />

positioned<br />

<strong>Plate</strong> Packs are secured to the<br />

Beams<br />

Weirs are leveled and Installation<br />

completed<br />

Troughs are lowered in<br />

position


MIRAMAR WTP SAN DIEGO, CA – 220 MGD


BUNDAMBA AUSTRALIA – 40 MGD


LUGGAGE POINT, AUSTRALIA – 31 MGD


AUGUSTA, GA 20 MGD


ATLANTIC CITY, NJ - 20 MGD


WYOMING, MI – 90 MGD


JERSEY CITY, NJ – 90 MGD


GALLATIN, TN SUBMERGED PLATES – 20 MGD


SLUDGE REMOVAL


Design Criteria for Sludge Removal<br />

• Must remove settled solids over the entire floor<br />

• Provide low head sludge discharge such as:<br />

Low head directional orifice blocks<br />

• No flexible hoses or articulating pipes.<br />

• Must have the capability of higher removal rates in the<br />

front areas of the basin


GUIDE CURB<br />

TELESCOPING<br />

PIPE<br />

SUCTION<br />

HEADERS<br />

SLUDGE SCRAPERS


AUGUSTA, GA<br />

AUGUSTA, GA 4 UNITS


Cleaning cycle initiated: Valve opens - Drive starts


Cleaning cycle: Solids Removal


Cleaning cycle completed:<br />

Drive stops – 3 minute pipe flush – Valve closes


Return cycle:<br />

Drive starts - Orifices are back flushed


Return cycle completed:<br />

Drive stops


<strong>Membrane</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-<strong>treatment</strong> <strong>Using</strong> <strong>Plate</strong> <strong>Settlers</strong><br />

THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING<br />

51 st Annual<br />

Water Workshop<br />

& Exhibition<br />

Joe Brauch<br />

Meurer Research<br />

6270 Joyce Drive<br />

Golden, CO 80403

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!