Proposed Expansion of Container Handling Facilities in ... - Transnet

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
Proposed Expansion of Container Handling Facilities in the Port of Durban
Public Meeting
10 May 2007
Meeting Record
Present
A list of all who registered their attendance at the public meeting is attached.
1. Welcome and Introduction
The facilitator David Shandler of Common Ground welcomed all attendants to the
first public meeting in a participation process to be conducted on Transnet’s
proposed Durban Port expansion. He explained that the purpose of the process was
to assist in ensuring a wise outcome be achieved with regards to Transnet’s
proposals to expand their container handling facilities. In order for this to happen
there will need to be a structured and ordered process that recognises and
addresses each stakeholder’s hopes, fears, interests and issues. The process also
seeks to generate and investigate alternative proposals. It would aim to find creative
solutions to obstacles and challenges. In order to fulfil these functions, the process is
likely to be long and iterative. He assured participants that they could have significant
input in the process through a large number of engagement opportunities.
The facilitator emphasised that this initial phase of this process is not part of the EIA
(Environmental Impact Assessment) process for this proposal, which is yet to begin.
This initial phase of participation has begun prior to the EIA in order to communicate
information on the proposed expansion to all interested and affected parties and to
inform these stakeholders about the upcoming process. This public meeting forms
part of a broader participation exercise that will eventually feed into an EIA process.
2. The Proposed Development
Krish Reddy, the General Manager for Planning in the Transnet Group, gave a
presentation detailing the challenges Transnet faces in particular with regards to their
anticipated future demand and their corresponding lack of capacity to handle such
demand. He then went on to outline Transnet’s proposed solution – namely the
expansion of a container terminal into the Bayhead area of the bay. He emphasised
that Transnet has a sincere commitment to pursue a solution that is sustainable. A
copy of his presentation s attached, and can also be accessed online at
www.transnet.net/TransnetProjects.aspx
Public Meeting Record
1
10 May 2007

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
Discussion
Following the presentation participants raised questions and concerns. Where
requested by the facilitator, representatives of Transnet responded. The discussion
is summarised by theme below.
Traffic Issues
A significant proportion of comments made at the meeting were related to the
problem of traffic congestion. A number of participants, particularly those
representing residents around the port and recreational users of the bay, referred to
the “havoc” on the roads around the harbour. They would like to see this problem
solved as soon as possible. They argued that, instead of relieving the situation,
Transnet’s proposal seems to project a scenario where more trucks and cars will
make use of the roads, thereby worsening the situation.
Mario Steyn, of Transnet Projects, acknowledged the problem and indicated that
feasibility studies were being done to inform how best to deal with the traffic problem
in both the short and the long term. He explained how Transnet’s Bayhead proposal
intends to improve the traffic problem. He noted that as soon as dredging of the basin
begins, Bayhead Road would be affected. An alternative road with several lanes will
be constructed to replace Bayhead road, routed around the new development. Links
will also be provided between this and other roads. He said that this new proposed
road layout would be an upgrade from the current situation. He also explained that
Transnet was pursuing a strategy to shift more freight, and particularly the growth in
freight, onto rail. The Bayhead development will include realigning rail yards. The
new rail system will be more efficient than the current system and is set to transport
up to 50% of freight in the future, but designed to take up to 80% if required.
A participant argued that interim solutions were necessary and that improvements
should not only be instituted after 2010. Another argued that the new road planned
would not be sufficient since it only provides one access road to the port. He argued
that this would not solve the congestion problem. He believed that the transport
strategy around the new development had not been thought through sufficiently. He
argued further that the shift to rail would not be successful as cargo was often time
sensitive. Rail presents a much slower option than road transport. Mario Steyn
explained that the rail option would become feasible, as it would be made
significantly more efficient by utilising 50 truck block trains with turn around times of
no longer than 3.5 hours per train.
A Bluff resident noted that tip trucks carrying concrete were being driven through the
residential areas around the port on a daily basis. The facilitator noted that this point
was not strictly applicable to the process on the proposed expansion. However, the
comment was useful in that the issue of construction vehicles would become relevant
if this project were to enter a construction phase.
Recreation Issues
Several participants asked for clarity on the future of recreational clubs in the bay. A
member of the Kwa-Zulu Natal Rowing Association asked about the impact of the
Public Meeting Record
2
10 May 2007

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
development on the recreational users in the silt canal. He noted that in Transnet’s
presentation an artist’s impression of the development seemed to show that the clubs
remained intact. On the other hand, plans indicate that the silt canal will be converted
into a wetland or eco-system. He asked for details on this discrepancy. Transnet’s
representative said that it was not possible at this stage to not give a definitive
answer on the future of the clubs. Several options for the silt canal are currently
being considered. He did, however, say that Transnet recognised the value of the
clubs and the opportunities for leisure that clubs provided in the bay. This issue will
continue to receive attention during the feasibility study currently being undertaken.
The future of the recreational clubs will be an important issue to address during the
EIA process.
A participant asked that, if the clubs were allowed to remain in the silt canal, better
access to be area be provided to recreational users. He suggested that a separate
road could be built that was restricted to use by small vehicles, thereby separating
motor cars from large trucks.
The Residential Interest
Residents raised concerns that trucks are using residential roads to, and from, the
port. Even though trucks are not permitted to use these roads, they continue to do
so. This is not safe and also damages the roads. Residents are concerned that this is
not being monitored. Concern was also raised around the fact that there are only
three ways in which the 30 000 residents of the Bluff can access the area. This was
argued to be insufficient. The facilitator noted that these issues were not strictly
relevant to this process given that the scope of the process relates to Transnet’s
proposed port expansion and not to the use of City managed roads. He added that
he would try to direct such comments to the relevant authorities.
Representatives of the Clairwood Residents’ Association raised concerns about the
development and its effect on their community. They expressed fears about
expropriation and sought clarity on the exact dimensions of the proposed expansion.
They wanted assurances that this development will not advance into their area. They
were also concerned that the development will result in displaced companies and
industries seeking land in their community. The encroachment of industry into their
residential area would be very negative for those choosing to continue to live in this
area. They also questioned Transnet on how it proposed to use land that it owned in
Clairwood that had been vacant for years. Issues concerning the community and the
municipality were also raised. The Clairwood Ratepayers Association made a
submission detailing their concerns. This submission is attached. (See Annexure)
Business Issues
A representative of the Durban Chamber of Commerce and Industry expressed some
concern about the timing of the project. He noted that Transnet’s presentation
projects that Bayhead will come on line in 2014, but that the port would run out of
capacity in 2010. He wanted to know what stopgap measures Transnet had put in
place for the years between 2010 and 2014. Krish Reddy noted that the Port of
Ngqura was being developed to handle increased demand between 2010 and 2014.
Public Meeting Record
3
10 May 2007

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
Security Issues
There was concern that Transnet’s proposal did not seem to include any
consideration of the issue of security. For any security measures to be effective, the
issue must be considered during the planning stage.
Concern was raised about the safety of tourists in, and around, the port. A second
participant asked if Transnet had a strategy in place for dealing with the illegal
operations and organised crime that occurred within the port. The facilitator noted
that this point was not directly pertinent to this process. The Acting Port Manager
noted that as far as he was aware, there were no illegal operations in the port. He
asked that any information about illegal activities be reported to Transnet’s fraud
hotline.
Tenant Issues
Several participants requested clarity on what Transnet’s approach would be toward
tenants of the affected areas, particularly those with long leases. Specifically, there
was a question about how tenants from the ship building and ship repair industry
would be accommodated or affected. A member from Marine Yacht Lift also asked
that consideration be given to the yachting industry. Representatives of these
interests wanted to know what Transnet’s thinking was around compensating
tenants. In response, it was noted that Transnet is not yet in a position to comment
on these issues. Separate consultations with tenants have been held and will
continue to be held to discuss these issues. This interest will also be addressed more
comprehensively through the EIA process.
A participant noted that several tenants had been awarded very long leases for what
he described as “ridiculously” low rents. It was asked that this issue be investigated
further.
Ecological Issues
A representative of the Wildlife and Environmental Society of South Africa asked
Transnet to remember that the bay includes, but should not be reduced to being seen
as only the Port of Durban. She stressed that a key imperative should be to preserve
the functioning of the ecosystem found in this remarkable bay. She urged Transnet
to seriously consider pursuing the southern access option rather than the northern
channel. She was very concerned that the ecosystem in the bay would be
significantly impacted if the sand bank were to be trimmed. This trimming would be
necessary if the Northern channel was to be the route used by ships accessing the
new Bayhead basin.
Funding
A participant asked what the implications of this development would be for the
taxpayer. Moira Moses, the group executive for Transnet Projects, explained that
Transnet would finance this project with its own funds. It was stressed that Transnet
is run like any private company. It has its own balancing sheet and does not receive
regular stipends from government.
Public Meeting Record
4
10 May 2007

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
Procurement and Employment
A participant asked about procurement. She specifically wanted to know what
Transnet’s policies were with regards to black economic empowerment (BEE). Moira
Moses assured participants that Transnet was committed not only to the codes and
requirements of BEE legislation but also to the principles of broad based black
economic empowerment (BBBEE). Transnet was particularly concerned with
creating opportunities for black South Africans, women and previously disadvantaged
people. Transnet was also in the early stages of initiating an enterprise development
project with potential small enterprises in local communities. It was noted that there
was still a long process to be undertaken before the details on procurement become
relevant to this project.
Councillor Nene of Ward 26 asked about the opportunities that would be created for
employment. She was particularly interested in hearing about what Transnet’s
policies were on employing local labour. Moira Moses explained that a project of this
magnitude would generate numerous employment opportunities. She noted that
already the project is drawing on local labour. She assured participants that Transnet
would continue to source labour in local communities.
Alternative Logistic Solutions
Councillor du Bois, who also represents communities adjacent to the port, proposed
that a “dry port” be developed in the Cato Ridge area. This would relieve pressure
from the port area. A copy of the written submission he submitted to the meeting is
attached. (See Annexure)
Another participant recommended that a truck park would solve some of the traffic
problems experienced in the vicinity of the port.
3. Stakeholder Involvement
Lisa van Dongen of Common Ground described the public participation process that
Common Ground will facilitate on Transnet’s proposed Bayhead expansion. She
emphasised that the process is to be governed by the principles of inclusivity and
transparency. She outlined the different phases of participation and gave examples
of the various forms in which the engagement could be undertaken. She introduced a
proposal to establish a stakeholder forum and sought endorsement for this idea. A
copy of her presentation is attached and can be accessed online at
www.transnet.net/TransnetProjects.aspx
Discussion
The Process
A participant sought clarity on the EIA process. The facilitator explained that the EIA
for this project had not yet begun and was anticipated to begin in the second half of
2007. Following this response, a participant asked how the current participation
process would align with the EIA process. She was concerned that this initial process
would have to be repeated when the EIA began. The facilitator said that the
processes had been aligned. Common Ground had initiated a preliminary
stakeholder process and would continue the consultation process into the EIA. All
Public Meeting Record
5
10 May 2007

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
issues and comments raised in the initial phases of engagement would be kept on
record and would be revisited in the EIA process.
A representative of the shipping industry asked that the process be run as quickly
and efficiently as possible. He stressed that implementation of the proposed
expansion must begin as soon as possible as already their industry is being affected
by a lack of capacity. They hope for a quick decision on this development.
The Forum
Following a request from the facilitator for any concerns regarding the principle of
setting up of the proposed forum as presented in the presentation, no objections or
issues were raised.
A participant requested that representatives of the road transport sector be added to
the list of proposed stakeholders to be included in the forum.
4. Next Steps
The facilitator described the next steps in the participation process. Firstly, a record
of the public meeting would be distributed to all participants of the meeting.
Thereafter, the facilitators would contact the various stakeholder sectors that are to
be included in the forum. The outcome of these meetings will be the establishment of
a forum of stakeholders. The second phase of the participation process will begin
when the EIA is initiated. This is scheduled to begin in the second half of 2007.
5. Closure
The facilitator thanked all participants for attending the meeting. He welcomed all
comments, questions and issues, which should be directed to Common Ground by
emailing info@commonground.co.za or phoning (031) 304 9323. He closed the
meeting by expressing his anticipation for further engagement in the future.
Public Meeting Record
6
10 May 2007

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
Annexure
Attendance Register for Public Meeting, 10 May 2007
First name Surname Organisation
Nombuso Afolayan Vopak
Jay Akkiah Thekweni Reinforcing
Brian Akoon Isegen SA (Pty) Ltd
Mike Aldworth International Paint
David Allan Durban Natural Science Museum
Richard Allen SA Sugar Association
Bisetty Amathali Clairwood Ratepayers Association
N Ameer White Seagull
Shabbir Ameer Sharafath Shipping
A.O. Amod Clair Mosque
Trivi Arjunan eThekwini Municipality
Kim Atkins
Mike Atkins
Keith Barnett eThekwini Municipality
Judy Bell Coastwatch
Peter Besnard Green Africa Shipping
Sgwili Bhengu Bhengu M Mr
Iain Bickerton WESSA
Dorian Bilse NPA HQ
Ken Bircher Boat Builders Association, Royal Cape Cats
Per Bjorvic Thekweni Marine Group/ Marina Yacht Lieft
Gugu Blose eThekwini Municipality
Ricky Blukroy NPA
Hoosen Bobat
Anthony Botha Durban Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Neil Brauns United Container Depot
Basil Carlston Durban Chamber of Security & Justice Committee
Tony Cartledge Elgin Engineering
Wilson Z. Cele Sizabantu Industries
Allan Cerff Fynnland Angling Club
Warwick Chapman Kwazulu-Natal Rowing Association
Rajan Chetty NPA
Vijan Chetty PPECB (Perishable Products Export Contol Board)
Preston Chetty Durban Botanic Gardens (Parks)
Max Clarr Transnet Capital Projects
Avrille Coen eThekwini Municipality
Claude Coen
Roy Cowgill Natal Bird Club
Steve Coxen Royal Natal Yacht Club
J. Cullinan Cullprop
Louise Dawson MaerskLine
Lee D'eathe SDB Area Based Management Development
F. Dedekind NPA
Onie Dhliwayo DRPS
Di Dold WESSA
Grant Donaldson RJ Southey
Lee Donjeany Elgin Engineering
Public Meeting Record
7
10 May 2007

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
First name Surname Organisation
Ian Donjeany Elgin Engineering
Duncan Du Bois eThekwini Municipality
Peter Du Plussis Freight Max
Viren Durgapersadh Unilever
Glenda Duval Seafarers Mission
Phillip Edwards SAAFF KZN
Kobus Ehlers Island View Storage
Ben Els Fynnland Angling Club
Louise Emser Resident (Bluff area)
Samantha Enslin Business Report
Harry Etheridge ICAA
Jim Ferguson Island Sailing Club
Adriano Filli Maccaferri S.A.
Emile Fitzmaurice CPS Projects
Robert Fleming Ocean Projects
Bart Fokkens Durban Dragon Boating
Sally Frazer Durban University of Technology
Nimmi Fynn Unitor (Pty) Ltd
Kevin Gammie C.T.C. Cranes
Mike Gardner
Brian Giddy FreightMax
Jacek Golebiewski Jacek Marine Engineering
Louis Gontier SA Shipyards
Rob Goulden Point Yacht Club
Deva Govender SHS Freight
Leticia Greyling NPA - Environment
M.H. Haffejee NPA - Environment
Kate Hall Natal Rowing Association
Tim Hastie Rennies
S. Heiner Transnet Capital Projects
Per Heisselberg Maersk SA Ltd.
S. Hlubi P.O.M.
Victoria Hobson Garlicke & Bousfield Inc
Riaz Hussain Residents & Ratepayers Port Safety
Terry Hutson Ports & Ships
Fanie Joubert Island View Storage
F
Jurgens
A.M. Khan Star Shipping
M J La Grange United Container Depot
Matt Lamont Sealand Engineering
B Langeni NAPCAN
Mano Latchmiah Clairwood Community Policing Forum
Mike Laurier Heneways Freight Services
Alastair Lax Bidfreight
Herman Le Roux Transnet Capital Projects
J. Lee Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs
Bendelle Lempe Bhele Bhele Investment Holdings
André Lötter Ward 26
Gerard Loubser Mitchell Cott Maritime
M. Love
Ian Love Durban Boat Owners Association
T.E. Lunde Jahre-Wallem
Public Meeting Record
8
10 May 2007

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
First name Surname Organisation
Mike Lusted G C Cranes (Pty) Ltd
Gavin Maasdorp Imani Development
Chris Mabetull NPA
Fiona MacKay South African Association for Marine Biology Research (SAAMBR)
Prasheen Maharaj SA Shipyards
G. Makhubu eThekwini Municipality
Carla Manion NPA
Judy Mann Seaworld / Ushaka Marine World
Malcolm Manton Safeboating Association
A. Marais Seafarers Mission
F.J. Marais Seafarers Mission
Kevin Martin The Harbour Carriers Association/FreightLiner Transport
Adrian Masson eThekwini Municipality
Andrew Mather Coastal Policy - eThekwini Municpality
Ahmed Mather Dormac
V. Mazibuko Akhona Trads
Gcina Mazibuko Trade & Investment KZN
Thokozani Mbambo Menamisi Trading Enterprise
Carol McBean
David McGillewie NPA
Alastair McInnes eThekwini Municipality
Jenny McIntosh Garlicke & Bousfield Inc
J P McMahon
Barry Meehan Durban Intl Boat Show
R. Meintjes Pompano Angling Club
Kevin Milne Durban Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Tracey Mitchley Schenter SA (Pty) Ltd
Phillip Mkhize Commercial Cold Storage
Praveen Mohanlall CHM Vuwani
L. Mondor PRS
Anthony Monty Freight Haul
Miza Moorosi Letsima Consulting
George Morey Protection & Security Services: Dbn Port (SAPS)
Ken Mouritzen Greystones Enterprises
Graham Muller Stella Canoe Club
Aubrey Muswema Sivest
Hari Naidoo Prinvee Trucking
Shaina Naidoo
Paul Naidoo K.Z.N. Training Centre
N. Naidoo Expeditors Institute
Jyothi Naidoo NPA
Steven Naidoo Samnar Investments
Kevin Naidoo Vopak
Prega Naidoo Thekweni Reinforcing
P.S. Nansoon Community Policing Forum
Ivan Narainsamy Lee Trans
Mike Narsey DRJ Marketing cc
Mlindelwa Ndaweni
Bonisiwe Nene eThekwini Municipality
B. Newman Council for Scientific Research
Vuyiswa Npanzi
Malazi Nthanzi SABC
Public Meeting Record
9
10 May 2007

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
First name Surname Organisation
Peter Ntuli Tlhalefo's Shipping
John Oldewage Port Stevedoring
Sahil Patel RRDW
Greg Pearson Ocean Group
S. Pecku NPA
Aslam Peer Cold Harvest Bayhead
Mark Penning South African Association for Marine Biology Research (SAAMBR)
Adrian Peters eThekwini Municipality
E. Petzer Fynnland Angling Club
Louis Pheiffer Ilembe
Keith Phipps Pompana Angling Club
Shamilla Pillay Council for Scientific Research
Selvan Pillay NPA
Bala Pillay Edison Power
Rajen Pillay Gantrans
Ian Pinnock Transnet Capital Projects
S. Pitts
Paul Podbielski
Heather Podbielsri Surrounding Property
Alan Posthumus Safeboating SA
Geoff Pullan eThekwini Municipality
Marshall Ramjathan Schenker Logistics
Sunil Ramkissoon eThekwini Municipality
G. Ramsamy Tekweni Marine, Marina Yacht Lift
John Randall Fynnland Angling Club
Krish Reddy Transnet Capital Projects
Mervyn Reddy Clairwood Ratepayers Association
Charles Reddy Izinyoni Trading 238 (Pty) Ltd
Marlin Reddy Sealink
Toni Redman eThekwini Municipality
Monika Reiner H & R Petroleum SA (Pty) Ltd
Debra Roberts eThekwini Municpality
Colin H. Roper Fynnland Angling Club
Henri Rouillon
Paul Scannell ASABOSA
Fred Schoon Shipbuilders Durban
David Shandler Common Ground
Skumbuzo Shange Siyathaba Community
Bev Shipley Transnet Capital Projects
Mbohiso Sigonyela Transnet
Rishi Singh Clairwood Ratepayers Association
Malcolm Sodalay KTB Clearing & Forwarding cc
Cassim Soobadar Star Shipping
Malcom Sparks Schenker Logistics
B. Stead Sozo Logistics
Conrad Steenkamp
Mario Steyn Transnet Capital Projects
John Storm
Dave Strumberg Transnet
Juanita Strydom Unitainer
Deshnee Sukdeo eThekwini Municipality
Russell Swanepoel Expeditors Institute
Public Meeting Record
10
10 May 2007

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
First name Surname Organisation
Kevin Temperton Spoornet
Andrew Thomas Ocean Africa Container Lines
W Todd Pompani Angling Club
M A Tordesillas Novagroup (Pty) Ltd
Derrick Trend Edison Power
Humphrey Trinidad MAI Project
Doug Trotter Council for Scientific Research
Barry Turner Bluff Yacht Club
N. Tutu Tarice/Ilima JV
Jon Van Coller Vancometrics
Clinton Van der Berg Big Lift Trucks
Christelle van der Merwe
Lisa Van Dongen Common Ground
Des Vaubell Seafearers Mission
Charles Viljoen Charlies Treefelling
Queen Vincent Trade & Investment KZN
Neil Watson Maydon Wharf Leaseholders
C. Watson Sozo Logistics
Dave Watts SAAFF
P
Weber
Kevin Weerts Transnet Capital Projects
Steven Weerts Council for Scientific Research
Andy West Pompano Angling Club
Les Westergreen Corsair Logistics
Terry Whitfield Seafarers Mission
David Wilkinson Ceramica Italia, Elcon Cranes
Gavin Wilsenach Bluff Yacht Club
Richard Winn
A Wisenburg PRDW
Phillip Wood
Anthony Yunnie Imani Development
Khosi Zondi NPA - Environment
Steven
Rennies Ships Agency
Prashan
Trans Freight Logistics
Public Meeting Record
11
10 May 2007

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
Annexure
Presentations Given at Public Meeting, 10 May 2007
Public Meeting Record
12
10 May 2007

Content
1.0 The Challenge
2.0 The Transnet Organisation
3.0 Container Traffic in SA
4.0 Future Container Demand Forecast
EXPANSION OF CONTAINER HANDLING FACILITIES
IN THE PORT OF DURBAN
PUBLIC MEETING
10 May 2007
5.0 Port of Durban – Current Projects
6.0 Bayhead - Proposed Layout
0
1
1.0 The Challenge
The Challenge:
The Port of Durban will run out of container capacity in 2010
and will not cope with the projected container traffic increase.
It needs to grow and support economic growth in South
Africa through its role in the movement of high value goods.
Transnet’s Response:
Consider expanding container handling facilities in the
Bayhead area.
2
3
1

2.0 Organisation Structure
TRANSNET
National freight transport &
logistics company
SOUTH AFRICAN GOVERNMENT
(Department of Public Enterprises)
Sole shareholder
2.0 The Transnet Organisation
RAIL
OWNER /
OPERATOR
PIPELINES
OWNER /
OPERATOR
LANDLORD
PORT
AUTHORITY
PORT
TERMINAL
OPERATOR
4
5
Transnet’s Role & Mandate
South Africa’s strategic location
“The public sector discharges its responsibilities to our people as a critical player in the process of
the growth, reconstruction and development of our country by reducing the cost of doing business
in our country.”
President Mbeki : State of the Nation Address 21 May 2004
From a Transnet perspective “reducing the cost of doing business in our country”
~ reducing the logistics cost of freight transport to make South Africa competitive
in the global economy
- Focus on freight transport & logistics for bulk & manufacturing sector
- Improve efficiency & reliability of operations
- Provide capacity through infrastructure development & maintenance programs
South African Ports at the nucleus of maritime
routes for the emerging economies of the world:
SOUTH AMERICA – SOUTH AFRICA – SE ASIA
6
7
2

Container Traffic in SA
3.0 Container Traffic in SA
2 334 999 – 66%
764 753 – 22 %
407 278 – 11%
41 836 – 1%
Container volumes - 2006/7
8
9
Demand Forecast Sources
4.0 Future Container Demand Forecast
• Economic Freight Forecast Model – University of Stellenbosch
• National Economic Objectives – ASGISA – 6 % growth rate
• Key customer and stakeholder interactions
• Specific economic sector / market research
• International economic drivers
• Study commissioned with Graham Muller & Associates
CONTAINER DEMAND FORECAST FOR PORT OF DURBAN
10
11
3

Port of Durban Container Forecast (2006 – 2020)
12,000,000
TEU VOLUMES & CAPACITY
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
Port runs out of capacity in 2010
Port Capacity at 2010
2005 2010 2015 2020
YEARS
5.0 Port of Durban – Current Projects
2006
(Actual)
2010
2015
2020
2006 – 2020
Growth
CONTAINERS
Medium growth (TEU)
2 334 000
3 613 000
6 128 000
8 280 000
255 %
12
13
Port of Durban : Current Projects
Car Terminal
Expansion
Maydon Wharf
Redevelopment
Pier One Container
Terminal Expansion
R1,9 b
Entrance Channel
Widening – R 3,022 b
Khangela Bridge
R140 m
DCT Upgrade – R 800 m
6.0 Bayhead – Proposed Layout
Island View Berth
Reconstruction – R510 m
Bayhead – Edwin Swales
Link Road
14
15
4

Bayhead: Proposed Layout
16
Bayhead – Current Layout
Bayhead – Proposed Layout
18
19
5

Overview
Participation in the
Durban Port
Container Handling Process
10 May 2007
• Participation Goals
• Phases of Participation
• Forms of Participation
• Proposed Stakeholder Forum
– Overview
– Purpose
– Composition
– Implementation Steps
• Next Steps in the Process
• Conclusion
Participation Goals
• We want to:
– Provide access to information
– Involve as broad a group of stakeholders as
possible
– Create opportunities for comprehensive
discussion and debate
– Deal with key concerns and interests
– Seek as much agreement as possible
Phases of Participation
• Phase One
– Initial Contact
– Initial Information
• Phase Two
– Environmental Impact Assessment Process
• Scoping
• Impact Assessment
• Reporting
• Phase Three
– Ongoing Contact and Involvement
Forms of Participation
Stakeholder Forum Overview
• Public Meetings
• One-on-One Consultations
• Workshops
• Stakeholder Forum
• Other
• To bring together representatives of key
sectors
• To deal with the process and the proposed
development
• To work with us throughout the process
Not to replace the ongoing process of
public participation
1

Purpose of Stakeholder Forum
• To be:
– Representative of all key sectors who:
• Have an interest
• Are affected
– A vehicle to debate:
• Process issues
• Proposals and Implications
• Note:
– Not a decision making body, but seeks as much
agreement as possible
Composition of Stakeholder Forum
• We suggest the following sectors:
– Transnet
– Local Government
– Organised Business
– Trade Unions
– Tenants
– Community Organisations
– Environmental Organisations
– Recreational Groups
– Other Bay Users
• Each sector to select own members
• Numbers to be at manageable level
• Numbers to be determined in consultation with sectors
Stakeholder Forum Implementation Steps
Next Steps in the Process
• Tonight:
– In principle agreement
• After Tonight:
– Consult on numbers and Terms of Reference
– Convene general meeting to confirm
composition and for sectors to agree on
representatives
• We will take steps to establish a stakeholder
forum
• We will continue to engage with stakeholders in
the various sectors
• We welcome you to approach us to get involved
in the process
Conclusion
Further Information
• We seek as much participation as
possible
• We want your feedback on:
– The process as a whole
– The idea of the Forum and its
composition
– The proposed process for establishing
the Forum
Contact Common Ground
Tel: 031 304 9323
Fax: 031 304 9324
Email: info@commonground.co.za
Copies of the presentations given tonight are
available on:
www.transnet.net/TransnetProjects.aspx
2

Proposed Container Handling Expansion
Annexure
Submissions Received at the Public Meeting, 10 May 2007
Public Meeting Record 10 May 2007