04.11.2014 Views

LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TBILISI ... - LED

LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TBILISI ... - LED

LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TBILISI ... - LED

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Local Economy Assessment and SWOT Analysis ..........................................................................................6<br />

Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................6<br />

Tbilisi basic info......................................................................................................................................................8<br />

1. Demography ................................................................................................................................................. 11<br />

1.1. Tbilisi community.................................................................................................................................... 11<br />

1.1.1. Age and gender structure............................................................................................................... 11<br />

1.1.2. Education structure of Tbilisi population........................................................................................ 13<br />

1.1.3. Geographical structure of population............................................................................................. 14<br />

1.1.4. Changes in the Tbilisi population.................................................................................................. 16<br />

1.2. Workforce................................................................................................................................................ 19<br />

1.2.1. Workforce and economically active people................................................................................... 19<br />

1.2.2. Unemployment................................................................................................................................ 20<br />

1.2.3. Workforce........................................................................................................................................ 21<br />

1.3. Wages..................................................................................................................................................... 22<br />

1.3.1. Average monthly salaries by sectors............................................................................................ 22<br />

1.3.2. Earnings by gender ........................................................................................................................ 23<br />

1.4. Quality of life ........................................................................................................................................... 24<br />

1.5. Informal economy................................................................................................................................... 26<br />

1.6. Education................................................................................................................................................ 28<br />

1.6.1. Numbers and types of schools ...................................................................................................... 28<br />

1.6.2. Teachers ......................................................................................................................................... 29<br />

1.6.3. Further and higher education......................................................................................................... 29<br />

1.6.4. Occupational shortages and oversupply....................................................................................... 31<br />

2. Economic base and current economic performance. .......................................................................... 35<br />

2.1. Number and size of firms by sector;...................................................................................................... 35<br />

2.2. Numbers of full-time equivalent employees;......................................................................................... 36<br />

2.3. Investment .............................................................................................................................................. 38<br />

2.4. Start-ups.................................................................................................................................................. 39<br />

2.5. Export and trade statistics;..................................................................................................................... 40


2.5.1. Direction of trade............................................................................................................................. 41<br />

2.5.2. Trade Turnover ............................................................................................................................... 41<br />

2.6. Airport, rail cargo, passenger statistics.................................................................................................. 42<br />

3. Geographical map of the broader region................................................................................................ 45<br />

3.1. Georgian’s and Tbilisi neighbors ........................................................................................................... 45<br />

3.1.1. Russia.............................................................................................................................................. 46<br />

3.1.2. Kazakhstan ..................................................................................................................................... 47<br />

3.1.3. Ukraine ............................................................................................................................................ 48<br />

3.1.4. Georgia............................................................................................................................................ 49<br />

3.1.5. Armenia........................................................................................................................................... 50<br />

3.1.6. Azerbaijan ....................................................................................................................................... 51<br />

3.1.7. Kyrgystan ........................................................................................................................................ 52<br />

3.1.8. Uzbekistan ...................................................................................................................................... 53<br />

3.1.9. Tajikistan ......................................................................................................................................... 54<br />

3.1.10.Turkmenistan .................................................................................................................................. 55<br />

3.2. Economic factors in selected economies in Tbilisi’s region ................................................................. 56<br />

3.3. Benchmarking of Tbilisi’s economy....................................................................................................... 59<br />

4. Assessment of the business environment............................................................................................ 69<br />

4.1. Business environment............................................................................................................................ 69<br />

5. Assessment of current strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in the local economy:71<br />

5.1. Identification of key problems facing City of Tbilisi economy..............................................................74<br />

6. Appendices................................................................................................................................................... 75


CHARTS<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

TABLES


CHARTS<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

TABLES


Report<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

This report includes the evaluation of Tbilisi local economy and the SWOT analysis and<br />

thus illustrates the first stage of writing the Local Economic Development Plan for the City<br />

of Tbilisi.<br />

Statistical data quoted in the report have been collected by the SRGG consultants<br />

assisted by the Economic Policy Department staff of Tbilisi City Hall. The assessment of<br />

data and evaluation of economic competitiveness was done by the team of SRGG<br />

consultants working with representatives of Tbilisi City Hall and other Georgian cities and<br />

regions: Rustavi, Kutaisi, Batumi, Kvemo Khartli, Mtsheta-Mtianeti.<br />

As the project continues this information will enable us to identify key barriers standing in<br />

the way of local development and help us suggest necessary solutions.<br />

Present condition of the economy determines the perspectives of local development.<br />

Widely used „passive marketing” (i.e. expecting initiatives from outside) by no means<br />

guarantees that regional resources are utilized for the benefit of local community. It is<br />

obvious that good will, or even an initiative demonstrated by local organizations, is not<br />

enough to ensure local development. What is more, if local authorities do not use their<br />

potential, positive solutions are even less likely to happen. Thorough knowledge about the<br />

condition of local economy, which can be obtained through analyzing each of its<br />

segments, must become a vital element of the local development policy.<br />

The report consists of six parts, the reference list and annexes.<br />

The first part describes the demographic situation in relation to the age and professional<br />

structure of employed and unemployed people. The data concerning education is also<br />

discussed in the chapter. The second part presents municipal economic resources and<br />

their current output. In the third part the economic structure of Tbilisi is compared with the<br />

situation in the region. In the next fourth chapter local business environment is analyzed<br />

with the reference to capital accessibility, business procedures, taxes. The final part<br />

includes the analysis of strong and weak points as well as the opportunities and threats<br />

that Tbilisi economy has to face.


In the Soviet era Tbilisi and Georgia were a part of centrally planned socialist economy.<br />

Transportation system, cooperation networks, trade links were mainly developed within<br />

internal Soviet market. And the country’s contacts with the rest of the world, including<br />

transportation infrastructure, were led through the Soviet Union. Political reasons and<br />

missing appropriate infrastructure not only stopped Georgia from the relations with<br />

partners from outside the USSR but, due to the supremacy of central institutions, also<br />

hindered bilateral contacts between the republics.<br />

As a result of the political changes in the region transportation channels across Northern<br />

Caucasus and Russia are closed.<br />

Presently Georgia and Tbilisi are re-establishing their traditional central role on the route<br />

from Asia to Europe. Not only does it require reconstructing economic and cultural links<br />

but it is also vitally important to invest in transportation sector. Investments in the sea<br />

harbours of Baku and Poti, the airport in Tbilisi and Baku, pipelines from Azerbaijan via<br />

Tbilisi to Turkey, new road and railway connections from Tbilisi to Turkey and Baku will<br />

integrate Georgia and Tbilisi into transit services and help rebuild natural cooperation<br />

bonds.


Tbilisi in region<br />

The capital of Georgia, Tbilisi, is located at one of the routes of historical silk-road and<br />

holds the best trade-transit center position due to its strategic location at the cross-roads<br />

of Russia, North Caucasus, Turkey and Trans-Caucasus, Armenia and Azerbaijan. The<br />

city is located in the South-East part of Georgia on both banks of river Mtkvari, in Tbilisi<br />

gorge. Due to its geographical position and natural climatic conditions, Tbilisi is one of the<br />

best located cities not only in Georgia but in the whole<br />

Caucasus region.<br />

Tbilisi represents important industrial, social and cultural center of East Europe and<br />

Caucasus region and, at the dawn of the millennium, is becoming one of the most<br />

important transportation links for global energy carriers, information flows and trade<br />

projects.<br />

The construction of the Kars (Turkey)-Tbilisi-Baku (Azerbaijan) 826-kilometer railway will<br />

probably be the most significant project in the entire Caucasus and could bring<br />

tremendous economic dividends to the region and international economy. The railway line<br />

has huge potential to deepen the integration of Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan, which, in<br />

turn, will link them more closely with Europe and Asia.<br />

.


Tbilisi metro area.<br />

Tbilisi metropolitan area is spreading along the river Mtkvari, so-called “Tbilisi trench”, and<br />

is located at the spot where several historical and ethnographic regions meet. Tbilisi<br />

metro’s role in the entire system of Georgian settlement is mainly based on its location on<br />

the cross-point of the basic country settlement axis, as well as the regional and<br />

transnational one.<br />

Metro territory consists of four municipal territories (Mtskheta, Tbilisi, Rustavi, Gardabani)<br />

and the sub–regional divisions (rayons).<br />

Mtskheta (the World Heritage Site) has overtaken the functions of historical-cultural and<br />

tourist-recreation center in the process of metro forming in the area of Mtskheta-Tbilisi-<br />

Rustavi-Gardabani. It is more reasonable that Mtskheta directly boarders Tbilisi and is<br />

eccentrically allocated in regard of the region.<br />

According to this concept,<br />

Mtskheta regional recreation part<br />

(e.g. Tskhvsarichamia, Zedazeni,<br />

Tsitsamuri,<br />

Armazi,<br />

Shiomghvime) remains within the<br />

Mtskheta municipality and is<br />

accordingly considered in the<br />

Tbilisi metro entire city planning<br />

space.<br />

Rustavi basically has industrial<br />

functions.<br />

Gardabani is known for its fuelenergy<br />

profile enterprises and<br />

storing functions.<br />

The potential to play administrational, business, financial, scientific, educational and<br />

cultural relation functions typical of a powerful regional center is the main city forming<br />

factor in Tbilisi.


City of Tbilisi.<br />

By January 1, 2006, population of Tbilisi amounted to 1093 thousand, 15.2% of Tbilisi<br />

population is ethnically non-Georgians. The major non-Georgian ethnic groups are<br />

Armenians, Russians, Azeri and Sestinas.<br />

Tbilisi represents multi-functional administrational, industrial and cultural-educational<br />

center of Georgia. The city is situated along 33 kilometers of the river Mtkvari and its total<br />

area is 372 square kilometers. River Mtkvari divides the city into two . The left bank side<br />

of the city exceeds the right side districts in both territory and population.<br />

Since 2001, after the unification of the districts, Tbilisi consists of the following ones:<br />

Gldani-Nadzaladevi (87.9 square km), Didube-Chugureti (18 square km), Vake-Saburtalo<br />

(84 square km), Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi (40.4 square km), Isani-Samgori (123.9 square km)<br />

and Tskneti village (17.8 square km). Almost 30 percent of population of the Capital City<br />

lives in Gldani-Nadzaladevi district, while the highest level of population density is shown<br />

in Didube-Chugureti district where, according to the 2005 census, there are 7 855 people<br />

per square km. On average, population density in Tbilisi is 2 937 people per square km.<br />

The lowest density is in Isani-Samgori district with 2 323 people per square km. The<br />

smallest part of Tbilisi population lives in Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi district with 93 922 people.<br />

Population density in Gldani-Nadzaladevi district is 3 677, in Vake-Saburtalo district –<br />

2930, in Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi district – 2 324 people per square km.<br />

At the beginning of 2007 Tbilisi significantly expanded its territory incorporating suburban<br />

areas. As a result, more housing and commercial land appeared on the market, which is<br />

of key importance for the growth of Tbilisi metropolitan area.


The analysis of trends in the city economy will start with the analysis of population<br />

migration and education background of the residents.<br />

<br />

This indicator measures changes in demographic and sex structure in the capital of<br />

Georgia starting from the 19th century until now It helps to understand the demographic<br />

profile of the city and the ability of city institutions, local authorities and socio – economic<br />

partners to respond to changes in demography. The diversity is measured by both gender<br />

and geographical location.<br />

<br />

Year Total population men women men in % women in %<br />

1897 159.5 95.2 64.3 59.7 40.3<br />

1926 294 147.3 146.7 50.1 49.9<br />

1939 519 251.0 268.0 48.4 51.6<br />

1959 702 311.0 391.0 44.3 55.7<br />

1970 889 404.0 485.0 45.4 54.6<br />

1979 1066 486.0 580.0 45.6 54.4<br />

1989 1246.9 573.3 673.6 46.0 54.0<br />

1996 1359.7 624.1 735.6 45.8 54.2<br />

2001 1089.7 492.5 597.2 45.1 54.9<br />

2002 1081.7 488.9 592.8 45.2 54.8<br />

2003 1083.5 489.7 593.8 45.1 54.9<br />

2004 1086.4 491.1 595.3 45.2 54.8<br />

2005 1092.6 493.9 598.7 45.2 54.8<br />

Development of Georgia, City<br />

of Tbilisi.<br />

The population of Tbilisi has increased from 159.5 thousand in 1897 to 1,092,600 in 2005.<br />

The distribution of the population by sex has changed extremely during the past century<br />

from the male domination at the end of 19th century and the beginning of the 20th until<br />

reaching stable higher female participation in the total number of city’s residents between<br />

1970 - 2005.<br />

Since 2002 (when the population reached its minimum as a result of continuous decline<br />

process that had begun in the early 1990s) the number of Tbilisi residents has been rising<br />

at a regular rate.


1876 1897 1922 1926 1959 1979 1989 2002<br />

Population total in<br />

thousands 104.0 159.6 233.9 294.0 694.7 1056.1 1246.9 1081.7<br />

Georgians 22.2 42.2 80.9 112.2 336.3 656.4 824.4 910.7<br />

Armenians 37.6 47.1 85.3 100.1 149.2 152.9 150.1 82.6<br />

Russians 30.0 44.8 38.6 45.9 125.7 129.1 124.9 32.6<br />

Ossetians 0.9 1.4 2.8 15.6 27.9 33.2 10.3<br />

Ukrainians 2.7 10.9 12.6 16.1 3.3<br />

Jews 1.3 2.9 8.8 8.9 17.3 14.8 13.5 1.6<br />

Azerbaijanis 3.3 5.8 9.6 12.9 18.0 10.9<br />

Kurds 2.5 12.9 23.4 30.3 2.1<br />

Greeks 0,4 1,2 1,3 1,4 7,1 16,2 21,7 3.8<br />

Other ethnic groups 11,6 17,8 14,3 14,1 10,1 9,7 14,7 23.8<br />

<br />

The population of Tbilisi is multinational. Two major ethnic groups are the Georgians and<br />

the Armenians. The most significant decrease within the group of Russians was observed<br />

after 1989, which was caused by political transformation taking place in the country.<br />

<br />

Avarage age in 2002<br />

Total Men Women<br />

M. Tibilisi 35.8 33.6 37.6<br />

Gldani - Nadzaladevi 34.9 33.1 36.4<br />

Vake - Saburtalo 37.3 35 39.2<br />

Isani - Samgori 34.4 32.5 36.1<br />

Didube - Chugureti 37.4 34.7 39.6<br />

Mtatsminda - Krtsanisi 36.4 33.8 38.6<br />

<br />

<br />

The residents average age is calculated between 32.5 (men in Isani – Samgori) and 39.6<br />

(women in Didube-Chugureti). Distribution by sex shows that women are older than men<br />

by a couple of years. Geographically, the district Didube – Chugureti is populated by the<br />

oldest residents, both female and male.


In %<br />

Level of education 1970 1979<br />

Higher 17.8 19.3<br />

Higher, incomplete 4.5 3.9<br />

Secondary, specialization 7.2 7.9<br />

Secondary, general 28.7 27.4<br />

Secondary, incomplete 14.4 11.4<br />

Primary 17.5 1.2<br />

Not specified 9.9 28.9<br />

Total 100.0 100.0<br />

<br />

<br />

Education level 2002 ( in thousands) 2002 ( %)<br />

General primary education 18.6 2.1<br />

General elementary education 66.2 7.6<br />

Complete general secondary<br />

education 220.5 25.4<br />

Vocational education 21.4 2.5<br />

Secondary tertiary education 127.6 14.7<br />

Incomplete higher education 44.7 5.2<br />

Higher 368.9 42.5<br />

<br />

In the educational structure of Tbilisi population a significant trend can be observed of<br />

people constantly improving their education level. In particular, the number of people with<br />

secondary and university education has increased. The process started in the early<br />

1970s and has resulted in a high share of residents with this level of education in a group<br />

of 14-44-year-olds (i.e. in the productive age), which is shown in the table below.<br />

<br />

Education level<br />

Age structure<br />

2002 ( in thousands)<br />

15-44 6.7<br />

45-59/64 2.4<br />

Primary 60+/65+ 9.5<br />

15-44 69.1<br />

45-59/64 35.9<br />

Professional secondary 60+/65+ 22.7<br />

15-44 128.6<br />

45-59/64 49.6<br />

General secondary 60+/65+ 42.3<br />

15-44 202.1<br />

45-59/64 107.8<br />

University 60+/65+ 59.1


The demographic changes observed during the last several years have to be seen as<br />

related to the whole metropolitan area, as Tbilisi area population is in fact a source of<br />

workforce for its economy. The data shows the number of residents, population density<br />

division in pre-productive, productive and post productive groups in a) narrow metropolis<br />

area such as: rayon Mccheta, Tbilisi, City of Rustavi and rayon Gardabani and b) broader<br />

metropolis area including areas of Daba Kojori and Daba Didi Lilo.<br />

<br />

Population Area ( km2) Population density<br />

Tbilisi 1 081 679 244,4 4425,8<br />

Rejon Mccheta 64 829 805,0 90,1<br />

City of Rustavi 116 384 60,6 1920,5<br />

Rejon Gardabani 114 348 1304,1 87,7<br />

<br />

<br />

Metropolitan Area<br />

Preproductive Productive age Postproductive<br />

Population<br />

(year 2002)<br />

age<br />

age<br />

Rejon Gardabani 114 348 27 832 73 473 13 043<br />

City of Gardabani 11858 2 872 7 829 1 157<br />

Rejon Mccheta 64 829 13 834 41 627 9 365<br />

City of Mccheta 7718 1 583 5 043 1 092<br />

City of Rustavi 116 384 26 470 78 664 11 241<br />

<br />

The measure of population diversity by rayons and cities in metropolitan area is vital to<br />

understand the economic well-being in the areas as compared to the whole metropolis.<br />

The most populated rayon Gardabani and the city of Rustavi have also the highest<br />

number of residents in productive age (almost 73 thousands and almost 79 thousands,<br />

respectively). Rayon Mccheta is on the third position with the number of 41 627 residents<br />

in productive age.<br />

<br />

1996 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Tbilisi - total 1359.7 1089.7 1081.7 1083.5 1086.4 1092.6<br />

of which:<br />

Gldani-Nadzaladevi 398 322.8 320.4 320.9 321.6 323.3<br />

Didube-Chugureti 196.9 140.6 139.5 139.5 139.7 141.4<br />

Vake-Saburtalo 299.2 245.5 243.8 244.0 244.6 246.1<br />

Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi 113.4 94.0 93.3 93.9 93.9 93.9<br />

Isani-Samgori 352.2 286.8 284.7 285.2 286.6 287.9


The total number of Tbilisi population has decreased by almost 300 000 inhabitants<br />

between 1996 – 2005, reaching finally the figure of 1 092 600. The same decreasing<br />

trend can be observe in all districts.<br />

The highest number of residents lives in Gldani – Nadzaladevi. In all districts the total<br />

number of residents has increased by small percentage during the last 5 years, except<br />

Mtatsminda – Krtsanisi, where the number of residents has stayed on the same level for 4<br />

years.<br />

<br />

District<br />

Total in<br />

2002<br />

Productive<br />

age<br />

%<br />

Preproductive<br />

age<br />

%<br />

Post<br />

productve<br />

age<br />

Gldani -<br />

Nadzaladevi 320,361 217,980 68.0 65,337 20.4 37,035 11.6<br />

%<br />

Vake - Saburtalo<br />

243,838 162,327 66.1 44,709 18.3 36,802 15.1<br />

Isani - Samgori<br />

284,691 196,570 69.1 57,237 20.1 30,851 10.8<br />

Didube -<br />

Chugureti 139,447 91,739 65.8 25,794 18.5 21,909 15.7<br />

Mtatsminda -<br />

Krtsanisi 93,342 63,137 67.6 17,462 18.7 12,743 13.7<br />

Tibilisi 1,081,679 731,753 67.6 210,539 19.5 139,340 12.9<br />

<br />

<br />

The detailed information about the population structure within the districts shows the age<br />

diversity of the capital city.<br />

Differences are not big but it is worth noticing that the productive age group amounts to<br />

69 % of Isani Samgori community. Post productive groups exceed 15% of the population<br />

of Vake-Saburtalo and Diube-Chugureti.


Analyzing the first indicator measuring the comparative population changes by districts it<br />

is important to take into account the measures not only from the last few years, but take a<br />

longer perspective in order to observe the ongoing demographic processes. The other<br />

indicator presents the past tendencies by age and gender in the years 1922 – 1922.<br />

<br />

2000<br />

Tbilisi residents population (1897 - 2005)<br />

1980<br />

YEARS<br />

1960<br />

1940<br />

1920<br />

1900<br />

159500<br />

294000<br />

519000<br />

702000<br />

889000<br />

1246900 1089700 1083500 1092600<br />

1066000 1359700 1081700 1086400<br />

Population<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Districts<br />

Census 1989 Census 2002 Changes in population<br />

Census Census Change % Change<br />

M. Tibilisi 1,263,489 1,084,087 -179,402 -14.2<br />

Gldani –<br />

Nadzaladevi 386,501 320,956 -65,545 -17.0<br />

Vake – Saburtalo 244,202 244,525 323 0.1<br />

Isani – Samgori 331,268 2,840,022 -47,246 -14.3<br />

Didube – Chugureti 194,740 140,011 -54,729 -28.1<br />

Mtatsminda –<br />

Krtsanisi 106,778 94,573 -12,205 -11.4


Age structure of Tbilisi population 1922-2002<br />

2002<br />

1989<br />

Preproductive<br />

Productive<br />

Postproductive<br />

1979<br />

1970<br />

YEARS<br />

1959<br />

1939<br />

1930<br />

1926<br />

1922<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />

% of Population<br />

<br />

<br />

Population by age structure and gender in years 1922 – 2002<br />

In % Age groups Men Women<br />

%<br />

Pre<br />

product<br />

ive<br />

Product<br />

ive<br />

Post<br />

product<br />

ive<br />

%<br />

Pre<br />

prod<br />

Product<br />

ive<br />

Post<br />

prod<br />

Pre<br />

prod<br />

Product<br />

ive<br />

Post<br />

prod<br />

1922 28.3 65.1 6.5 29.7 64.7 5.6 27.1 65.7 7.2<br />

1926 27.2 66.7 6.1 27.5 67.5 5.0 26.9 65.8 7.3<br />

1930 26.8 66.7 6.5 - - - - - -<br />

1939 27.1 67.3 5.6 27.8 66.6 5.6 25.8 66.8 7.4<br />

1959 22.9 67.1 10.0 26.3 65.0 8.7 20.3 68.7 11.0<br />

1970 24.2 63.6 12.2 26.9 65.4 7.7 22.0 64.1 13.9<br />

1979 22.8 64.9 12.3 25.2 65.2 9.6 20.7 64.1 14.6<br />

1989 24.6 59.3 16.1 27.2 62.4 10.4 22.4 56.7 20.9<br />

2002 19.5 67.6 12.9 22.0 70.6 7.4 17.3 65.2 17.5<br />

<br />

From the total number of Tbilisi residents of 1 263 489 in 1989 the population decreased<br />

by about 14 % until 2002. For the last 4 years the index of general population growth has<br />

been only 0,2%, in 2002 this index was absolutely negative (-0,7%).


The number of women increased slightly from 1989 to 2002, while in the same period the<br />

number of men decreased nearly by 200 thousand. Such tendency is conditioned by the<br />

wave of emmigration at the beginning of the 1990s largely depriving the community of<br />

able-bodied males. This misbalance in sex, in a short- and long-term perspective, may<br />

deeply affect the social-economic development of the society.<br />

Among all the districts the most significant population decrease by about 27% was<br />

observed in Didube - Chugureti district in 1989 – 2002.<br />

Generally, the demographic changes in Tbilisi result in gradual ageing of the whole<br />

population, which in turn causes systematic fall in the number of people in productive<br />

age. At the same time, we can notice a negative balance of migration, which also<br />

indicates unfavorable economic conditions in the city. Unfortunately, current data on<br />

migration is not available.<br />

<br />

In persons<br />

1889 1979 1989 1995 2002<br />

Population 1,066 1,246,936 1,378,9 1,081.7<br />

Natural increase 7,815 8,331 7,815 2,426 2,056<br />

Birth 18,185 19,802 13,565 12,007<br />

Deaths 10,370 11,987 11,139 9,951<br />

Marriages 10,975 10,404 5,393 4,192<br />

Divorces 3,173 2,912 1,504 1,001<br />

Natural increase per 1000<br />

inhabitants 7.7 6.3 5.6 1.9<br />

<br />

<br />

Natural increase<br />

In persons 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />

Tbilisi 1701 2688 2056 2438<br />

Gldani-nazaladevi 386 541 92 5<br />

Didube-chugureti 204 186 -152 661<br />

Vake-saburtalo -182 75 -136 -71<br />

Mtacmindakrcanisi<br />

927 1467 1618 1391<br />

Isani-samgori 366 419 634 452<br />

<br />

This indicator measures the balance between births and deaths in Tbilisi from the end of<br />

XIX century until 2002.<br />

Birth rate, death rate, and natural population growth rate have been decreasing since<br />

1889, which does not contribute to population growth of Tbilisi. The number of marriages<br />

and divorces, as measured in 1979 – 2002, has also been decreasing constantly.<br />

The comparison of births index and deaths index by districts measured between 2000 –<br />

2003 shows the highest number of births in Isani – Samgori district.


The indicator measures the number of employed people in Tbilisi, a breakdown by age<br />

groups and gender. This measure will provide more detailed information for better<br />

understanding the employment and unemployment profile in the capital city, that<br />

highlights availability of human resources and shows if there is a balance of age groups<br />

and gender. The employment rates make the relationship between demographic trends<br />

and the labor market more comprehensive.<br />

<br />

Economically active (*Labour force)<br />

In thds of people Total Women<br />

2000 422.2 194.4<br />

2001 434.5 205.4<br />

2002 448.5 209.1<br />

2003 429.0 204.5<br />

2004 426.9 206.0<br />

2005 429.8 203.9<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

20-<br />

24<br />

25-<br />

29<br />

30-<br />

34<br />

35-<br />

39<br />

40-<br />

44<br />

45-<br />

49<br />

50-<br />

54<br />

55-<br />

59<br />

60-<br />

64 65+ Total<br />

In thds


Unemployment changes can be analyzed in the period of five years. The number of<br />

unemployed people has increased in all age groups.<br />

<br />

In thds<br />

people


This indicator measures the total number of employed citizens in Tbilisi in the last four<br />

years. It breaks down data by type of activity in order to describe the active labor market.<br />

This data present key employment sectors in the past and show where the new jobs<br />

emerged during four years as well as those sectors which are in urgent need of<br />

improvement.<br />

<br />

2000 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Agriculture hunting & forestry 0.7 3.0 2.6 6.8 3.1<br />

Mining 1.4 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.5<br />

Manufacturing 24.9 28.4 29.8 33.9 39.0<br />

Electricity, gas & water supply 7.6 7.9 5.9 7.6 7.9<br />

Construction 10.4 12.8 17.0 15.4 11.6<br />

Wholesale & retail trade, repair of motor<br />

vehicles & personal & household goods 44.5 78.2 73.3 71.1 64.4<br />

Hotels and restaurants 5.8 5.7 6.4 7.7 6.6<br />

Transport, storage & communication 19.5 24.6 25.8 21.2 21.9<br />

Financial intermediation 0.2 3.4 4.1 5.2 6.1<br />

Real estate renting & business activities 11.2 10.7 19.9 16.7 15.2<br />

Public administration & defense, social<br />

security 43.2 37.9 32.5 29.1<br />

Education, healthcare & social work 37.3 64.3 63.7 67.6 69.1<br />

Other community, social and personal<br />

services activities 6.7 31.3 23.3 19.9 19.7<br />

Household economy with hired employment 5.1 5.3 6.5 8.4<br />

Exterritorial organizations & bodies 0.3 1.9 2.9 2.5<br />

Non identified<br />

Total 170.2 319.5 317.0 315.6 305.1<br />

<br />

The total number of employed decreased from 319.5 thousand to 305.1 thousand in four<br />

years. Most of them fill in education, health and social jobs in 2005.<br />

The highest increase in employment can be observed in manufacturing and trade,<br />

although in 2005 the number of workers in this segment fell, which was the effect of<br />

technological and organisational changes. Also, more workers were employed in<br />

segments dealing with services such as education, health & social work as well as social<br />

and personal services.<br />

It is worth pointing out that organizational changes in public administration and<br />

technological innovations in commercial sectors will result in further redundancies in the<br />

following years.


This indicator measures the average gross monthly earnings in GEL in 2005, break down<br />

by gender and major industry type. Tracking wage levels changes within the capital city<br />

industries can indicate their competitiveness.<br />

The second indicator measures the earnings of females in comparison with males during<br />

the last year.<br />

<br />

2005<br />

In GEL/month total Women Men<br />

By business type 302.9 217.6 348.8<br />

Agriculture, hunting and forestry 169.7 167.0 170.3<br />

Industry - total 326.9 244.6 363.5<br />

Mining industry and quarry 432.5 405.1 437.5<br />

Processing industry 253.9 180.3 292.6<br />

Power, natural gas and water supply 527.5 525.6 528.1<br />

Construction 339.0 271.7 343.7<br />

Wholesale and retail sale, repair of vehicles, motorcycles,<br />

household commodities and items of personal use<br />

222.1 186.4 247.8<br />

Hotels and restaurants 143.6 115.4 181.6<br />

Transport, warehouses and communications 267.9 238.7 277.4<br />

Financial intermediation 1146.8 1131.3 1164.1<br />

Property transactions, leasing and commercial activities 228.9 161.2 278.7<br />

Public administration and defense, mandatory social<br />

insurance<br />

433.1 378.9 448.1<br />

Education 168.8 151.0 199.2<br />

Healthcare and social service 136.6 119.8 193.8<br />

Other communal, social and personal services 165.5 148.9 184.6<br />

<br />

In 2005 the highest monthly average wage of 1146,8 GEL was earned in the financial<br />

intermediation sector, while the lowest one was paid in healthcare and social service -<br />

136,6 GEL. Female average monthly salaries are always lower then male salaries in all<br />

sectors<br />

<br />

In GEL/ month 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Entrepreneurial sphere – total 89.7 128.6 132.4 154.8 184.9<br />

of which:<br />

Industry 128.9 160.5 155.3 206.5 229.5<br />

Construction 169.2 175.6 198.8 232.3 304.8<br />

Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles,<br />

motorcycles and personal and household goods<br />

36.4 79.5 73.9 72.6 107.9<br />

Hotels and restaurants 78.9 150.5 190.7 242.6 233.3<br />

Transport, storage and communications 180.1 188.4 194.8 221.9 279.0<br />

Real estate, renting and business activities 106.2 123.6 127.0 156.0 184.7<br />

Education 61.8 88.0 85.5 113.2 112.2


The monthly average wage during the last five years has increased in all branches.<br />

Industries offering the highest salaries include mainly: financial intermediation, power,<br />

natural gas and water supply, public administration and defense, mandatory social<br />

insurance and constructions.<br />

<br />

<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Average monthly salary in (GEL) 80 129 154.8 174.4 218.7 302.9<br />

by gender:<br />

Men 192.0 200.3 251.6 348.8<br />

Women 106.0 133.4 166.7 212.6<br />

<br />

The average monthly salary of women improved during the 4 years. The average monthly<br />

salaries was almost doubled, but the gender pay gap still exists. In traditional economy<br />

sectors the gap was about 20%, while in the service sector the disproportion was not so<br />

big.


The basic measure of the quality of life is the cost of living in the city and the information<br />

how many individuals and families can cover these costs. In recent years living cost have<br />

increased by about one third.<br />

<br />

(GEL/month) a soul two<br />

souls<br />

three<br />

souls<br />

four<br />

souls<br />

five<br />

souls<br />

six and more<br />

souls<br />

2000 104.9 167.8 188.8 209.7 235.9 327.2<br />

2001 104.6 167.4 188.4 209.3 235.5 326.5<br />

2002 113.4 181.4 204.1 226.7 255.1 353.7<br />

2003 118.5 189.6 213.3 237.0 266.6 369.6<br />

2004 124.4 199.0 223.8 248.7 279.8 388.0<br />

2005 137.6 219.8 247.2 274.7 309 428.5<br />

<br />

The Government of Georgia established the amounts of social assistance for the families<br />

below the poverty margin which depend on the number of members of registered socially<br />

vulnerable families at the moment of allocation of the welfare benefit.<br />

The amounts are as follows: for single-member families – 38 GEL; for two-member<br />

families – 55 GEL; for three-member families – 70 GEL; for four-member families – 85<br />

GEL; for five-member families – 100 GEL; for six-member families – 115 GEL; for sevenmember<br />

families – 125 GEL. For the families with eight and more members 10 GEL<br />

assistance is added for the eighth and each additional member.<br />

As the above mentioned data indicates, on 30 May 2006 in Tbilisi there were 95 749<br />

people living in 33 349 families who considered themselves being in extreme poverty<br />

according to their socio-economic status and who expressed the wish to receive social<br />

assistance. Both by number of families and number of population, the majority of the<br />

registered families live in Gldani-Nadzaladevi (32.0%) and Isani-Samgori districts<br />

(23.0%), while the minority of registered families inhabit Vake-Saburtalo district (12.4%).<br />

The statistics indicate that the living conditions of the registered population are extremely<br />

hard. Considering the cash-based add-ins of all types, 37.2% of total financial income of<br />

registered population are old age pensions, 27.1% - salaries and 20.1% - income from<br />

individual business activity.


According to the declared data, total income of the last one month of the registered<br />

socially vulnerable population amounted to 3,082,604 GEL that is 32.1 GEL per person<br />

for the registered category of population, and this indicator represents only 32.5% of<br />

minimum living costs according to the Department of Statistics as of January 1, 2006<br />

(19.6% under old indicators).<br />

<br />

(mln. lari)<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Total income 176,3 214,3 244,7 261,7 291,2<br />

Cash income and transfers – total 161,0 198,2 230,5 252,3 277,6<br />

Contractual employment 91,3 109,6 126,4 127,2 142,3<br />

Self-employment 36,0 38,5 46,9 43,4 51,6<br />

Sales of agricultural products 0,5 0,2 0,3 0,6 1,9<br />

Income from asset holdings (lease of property<br />

and interest income)<br />

3,3 4,5 2,5 4,1 5,6<br />

Pension, stipends, family allowances, benefits 12,4 15,9 16,8 13,4 17,7<br />

Remittances from abroad 3,3 11,9 14,2 29,0 21,8<br />

Remittances from relatives 14,3 17,6 23,4 34,8 36,7<br />

In-kind income<br />

15,3 16,1 14,2 9,4 13,5<br />

Other cash total 34,4 21,4 68,3 48,2 50,9<br />

Sale of assets 10,9 9,2 25,9 7,6 21,3<br />

Debt or use of savings 23,5 12,1 42,4 40,7 29,6<br />

Cash – total 195,3 219,6 298,8 300,6 328,5<br />

Cash and non-cash means – total 210,7 235,7 313,0 310,0 342,1<br />

<br />

<br />

(mln. lari) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Total consumption expenditure 322.1 344.1 380.1 349.6 385.3<br />

Total cash expenditure on consumption 306.8 328.0 365.9 340.2 371.7<br />

Food item, alcohol, tobacco 158.7 170.7 180.8 172.3 189.2<br />

Clothing and footwear 15.1 16.7 16.6 16.0 18.3<br />

Household items 41.0 38.1 10.3 10.6 13.2<br />

Health care 14.9 18.1 25.7 21.1 20.3<br />

Fuel and electricity 19.0 24.3 32.5 30.4 32.4<br />

Transportation 28.1 27.5 50.2 38.5 39.7<br />

Education and recreation 13.7 15.3 28.7 11.8 13.1<br />

Other cash expenditure on consumption 16.3 17.2 21.1 39.5 45.6<br />

Consumption in kind 15.3 16.1 14.2 9.4 13.5<br />

Other expenditure – total 29.2 26.0 64.1 41.0 45.5<br />

Agriculture 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4<br />

Social transfers 1.5 2.4 5.9 7.1 8.6<br />

Savings or loans 27.5 23.4 22.5 20.2 21.4<br />

Investment 0.0 0.0 35.4 13.3 15.0<br />

Total cash expenditure 336.0 353.9 430.0 381.1 417.2<br />

Total expenditure 351.3 370.0 444.2 390.5 430.8


There have been two different periods of domestic economy in the last years. In the<br />

nineties and at the beginning of current decade undeclared activity was often the only<br />

chance for a family to survive.<br />

Information on non-observed economy in those years is presented on the basis of<br />

surveys conducted by the State Department for Statistics of Georgia National Accounts<br />

and the Macroeconomic Analysis Division.<br />

In the Georgian economy, especially in the entrepreneurial sector, the share of the nonobserved<br />

economy is quite high – one third in the total output and more than 55 percent<br />

in the entrepreneurial sector, according to estimates for 2000-2001.<br />

The share of the non-observed economy in the entrepreneurial sector varies a little<br />

across the years but remains very high:<br />

<br />

Total output of<br />

the economy<br />

Total output of<br />

the<br />

entrepreneurial<br />

sector<br />

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />

Non-observed<br />

26.9 27.4 28.3 29.2 33.2 33.7<br />

According to regular statistical<br />

surveys 73.1 72.6 71.7 70.8 66.8 66.3<br />

Total<br />

100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Non-observed<br />

56.8 54.7 54.3 54.2 56.1 57.8<br />

According to regular statistical<br />

surveys 43.2 45.3 45.7 45.8 43.9 42.2<br />

Total<br />

100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

<br />

The analysis of the non-observed economy shows that among non-statistical reasons of<br />

its existence the low level of accounting in small enterprises and the informal sector are<br />

the most important. In the informal sector it is often quite impossible to separate<br />

entrepreneurial income and expenses from other income and consumption expenditures<br />

of a household. For small enterprises this is combined with income understating that<br />

takes place for tax avoiding purposes, or just in case, to keep off possible complications<br />

when declaring income.<br />

In the informal sector a part of the production is often aimed for non-market selfconsumption.<br />

Therefore, to determine the real production extent in this sphere is one of<br />

the most difficult problems of measuring the non-observed economy.<br />

Due to large share of the informal sector in the national economy, this problem is<br />

especially important in Georgia. According to the estimates, in 2001 the share of the<br />

informal economy in the total output was as large as 35% and 57,8 for the entrepreneurial<br />

sector.


1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />

Share of the non-observed output in the total output of the<br />

section, percent<br />

Industry 46 43 40 39 41 41<br />

Agriculture, forestry, fishing 9 9 9 9 11 9<br />

Construction 18 35 33 33 45 52<br />

Transport 38 35 36 37 36 37<br />

Communications 23 23 19 24 21 25<br />

Trade 66 60 57 56 56 57<br />

Hotels and Restaurants 62 61 60 64 69 75<br />

Other 24 27 31 33 41 38<br />

Total economy 26.9 27.4 28.3 29.2 33.2 33.7<br />

<br />

Industries where the largest share of non-observed output to hotels and restaurants,<br />

construction, trade and industry was assessed during the survey.<br />

As in many post–communist economies, non recorded operations and the informal<br />

economy still remain among the major impediments to the economy. However,<br />

successful anti-corruption policies, together with increased institutional efficiency, have<br />

resulted in a clear tendency towards the legalization of the informal economy.<br />

<br />

In % 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />

Non recorded 32.6 32.9 33.6 31.6<br />

<br />

Although the most recent data was not available it should be pointed out that the tax<br />

collection has dramatically improved.<br />

Government reforms after “Rose Revolution” changed the situation by the introduction of<br />

new simplified business and tax regulations. As a result many existing non-observed<br />

companies registered their activities and started to pay taxes.


The demographic changes are primarily reflected in the Tbilisi educational system. It is<br />

important that there are enough schools and high standard school facilities. When private<br />

schools and institutions appear as competition for public schools, also the quality of<br />

education, curricula and certification processes have to be monitored.<br />

<br />

The indicator measures the number and types of schools by ownership, educational<br />

network and number of students in 1990/1991 – 2004/2005 school years to display the<br />

different educational opportunities and options.<br />

<br />

students Number of institutions Number of students, thsd.<br />

<br />

<br />

)<br />

Pre-school<br />

institutions<br />

Public general<br />

education<br />

schools<br />

Non-public<br />

general<br />

education<br />

schools<br />

Public<br />

professional<br />

secondary<br />

schools<br />

Private<br />

professional<br />

secondary<br />

schools<br />

Public higher<br />

educational<br />

institutions<br />

Private higher<br />

educational<br />

institutions<br />

1990/<br />

1991<br />

2000/<br />

2001<br />

2001/<br />

2002<br />

2002/<br />

2003<br />

2003/<br />

2004<br />

2004/<br />

2005<br />

1990/<br />

1991<br />

2000/<br />

2001<br />

2001/<br />

2002<br />

2002/<br />

2003<br />

2003/<br />

2004<br />

281 184 187 186 188 48,3 23.4 24.6 23.8 24.0<br />

2004/<br />

2005<br />

211 208 209 209 209 211 185,5 159.4 159.2 157.2 153.9 148.7<br />

55 61 66 74 85 6.5 7.1 8.6 9.0 12.9<br />

26 23 23 23 23 23 19,9 11.3 10.2 8.7 8.1 8.5<br />

17 15 17 18 21 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.3 2.1<br />

15 15 15 15 14 58.2 64.9 68.4 70.6 78.3<br />

87 90 90 87 104 20.4 17.2 18.1 16.8 21.3<br />

<br />

<br />

Tbilisi has several types of schools to choose from. In due course the number of public<br />

educational institutions in school years between 1990/1991 and 2004/2005 is stable and<br />

the number of non–public and private schools and institutions measured since 2000/2001<br />

has increased.<br />

The following trends can be observed regarding the number of pupils and students in<br />

Tbilisi. As a result of demographic changes the registered number of pupils in pre–school,<br />

public general education, public professional secondary schools and institutions has fallen<br />

down in comparison with 1990/1991, but in public higher educational institutions and in<br />

non–public or private schools the number of students has been constantly increasing<br />

since 2000/2001.


The detailed information was recorded for the public general education schools in the<br />

capital city, where the same number of 211 schools has existed since 1990/1991 school<br />

year. Although the day school number has increased during last 15 years (while evening<br />

schools decreased), at the same time the number of students in day schools has<br />

decreased by 40 000.<br />

<br />

<br />

Public general education<br />

schools<br />

Private general education<br />

schools<br />

<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

11,412 11,00 11,999 12,167 11,923<br />

1,800 2,153 2,27 2,700 2,072<br />

The public general educational schools and private general educational schools will<br />

reduce the number of employed teachers when the number of pupils continues to<br />

decrease.<br />

<br />

<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Total Women Total Women Total Women Total Women Total Women Total Women<br />

Total<br />

number of<br />

students 82.1 41.0 86.4 43.1 87.4 43.9 99.6 49.6 86.8 45.2<br />

In public<br />

universities 58.2 27.4 64.9 30.6 68.4 33.0 70.6 34.7 78.3 37.4 66.9 33.6<br />

In private<br />

universities<br />

17.6 - 17.3 10.5 18.1 10.1 16.8 9.1 21.3 12.2 19.9 11.6<br />

Graduated - - 12.7 6.8 14.7 8.1 13.8 7.2 15.0 8.0 15.9 8.6<br />

In public<br />

universities 9.3 5.1 9.4 4.7 11.3 6.0 10.7 5.3 11.4 5.9 11.9 6.4<br />

In private<br />

universities - - 3.3 2.1 3.4 2.1 3.1 11.8 3.7 2.1 4.0 2.2


In thds of students Public universities Private universities<br />

2000/2001 2001/2002 2005/2006 2005/2006<br />

Total 58.2 64.9 66.9 19.9<br />

Industry and<br />

construction 18.8 25.0 22.8 0.3<br />

Agriculture 3.5 3.4 2.9 1.5<br />

Economics 2.3 2.5 3.2 1.5<br />

Health care 4.3 4.4 4.1 1.1<br />

Physical culture<br />

and sports 1.9 2.2 2.9 2.6<br />

Education 24.3 24.1 26.0 10.6<br />

Art. and culture 2.8 2.9 4.3 0.8<br />

Others 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.5<br />

<br />

Each year more and more university students are recruited in Tbilisi. The trend can be<br />

observed both at state and private higher education organisations, which results from the<br />

fact that schools are competing for students.<br />

The most popular faculties are engineering, industry and construction and pedagogical<br />

studies.


2006 Tbilisi<br />

Saburtalo-<br />

Vake<br />

Isani-<br />

Samgori<br />

Didube-<br />

Chuhureti<br />

Gldani -<br />

Nadzaladevi<br />

Mtacminda-<br />

Krcanisi<br />

Registered vacant workplaces - 175<br />

Workers 98 80 18<br />

Specialists 28 25 3<br />

Technical staff 49 39 10<br />

Registered vacant workplaces by economic activity<br />

Agricultural<br />

industry,hunting,forestry<br />

Fish industry<br />

Heavy and mining industry<br />

Manufacturing industry 3 3<br />

Electricity,natural gas and<br />

water economy 2 2<br />

Constructions 75 57 18<br />

Wholesale and retail trade,<br />

consumer, motor-car and<br />

motorcycle services 7 7<br />

Hotels and restaurants 12 12<br />

Transportation<br />

management, warehouses<br />

and communication<br />

Financial activity 2 2<br />

Real estate finance,and<br />

commercial activity 19 10 9<br />

Executive personnel, selfdefense<br />

and mandatory<br />

insurance<br />

Education 9 9<br />

Public health and social<br />

services 40 36 4<br />

Other social and personal<br />

services 6 6<br />

Housing and communal<br />

services<br />

Registered job seekers - 8763<br />

Workers 2480 675 867 228 710 2766<br />

Specialists 4782 1991 926 1010 855 1035<br />

Technical staff 1501 602 268 311 320 424<br />

Primary education 2<br />

General education 20 7 7 7 5 90<br />

Full secondary education 2514 654 863 863 725 2690<br />

Primary training education 14 10 1 7<br />

Secondary training<br />

education 1630 616 425 425 343 478<br />

High/ university education 4584 1965 766 766 747 950


2005 Tbilisi<br />

Saburtalo-<br />

Vake<br />

Isani-<br />

Samgori<br />

Didube-<br />

Chuhureti<br />

Gldani -<br />

Nadzaladevi<br />

Mtacminda-<br />

Krcanisi<br />

Registered vacant workplaces - 391<br />

Workers 179 38 27 77 30 22<br />

Specialists 43 14 25 2<br />

Technical staff 169 59 27 45 11<br />

Registered vacant workplaces by economic activity<br />

Agricultural<br />

industry,hunting,forestry<br />

Fish industry<br />

Heavy and mining<br />

industry<br />

Manufacturing industry 19 9 3 7<br />

Electricity,natural gas<br />

and water economy<br />

Constructions 6 2 4<br />

Wholesale and retail<br />

trade,consumer,<br />

motorcar and<br />

motorcycle services 79 21 2 44 9 3<br />

Hotels and restaurants 11 1 7 3<br />

Transportation<br />

management,<br />

warehouses and<br />

communication 33 3 11 19<br />

Financial activity<br />

Real estate finance, and<br />

commercial activity 40 1 2 37<br />

Executive personnel,<br />

self-defense and<br />

mandatory insurance 13 4 9 9<br />

Education 1 1<br />

Public health and social<br />

services 10 1 9<br />

Other social and<br />

personal services 173 85 25 36 4 27<br />

Housing and communal<br />

services 6 21 2 6 9 3<br />

Exterritorial<br />

organisations<br />

Registered job seekers - 11953<br />

Workers 4986 658 791 194 577 2766<br />

Specialists 5150 1760 752 879 724 1035<br />

Technical staff 1817 600 268 266 259 424<br />

Primary education 2 2<br />

General education 106 7 3 1 5 90<br />

Full secondary<br />

education 4929 622 791 229 597 2690<br />

Primary training<br />

education 21 10 4 7<br />

Secondary training edu 1948 588 372 228 282 478<br />

High/ university<br />

education 4898 1776 645 867 660 950


2004 Tbilisi<br />

Saburtalo-<br />

Vake<br />

Isani-<br />

Samgori<br />

Didube-<br />

Chuhureti<br />

Gldani -<br />

Nadzaladevi<br />

Mtacmind<br />

a-Krcanisi<br />

Registered vacant workplaces - 405<br />

Workers 182 70 32 25 55<br />

Specialists 121 6 32 83<br />

Technical staff 102 10 67 2 23<br />

Registered vacant workplaces by economic activity<br />

Agricultural<br />

industry,hunting,forestry<br />

Fish industry<br />

Heavy and mining<br />

industry<br />

Manufacturing industry<br />

Electricity, natural gas<br />

and water economy<br />

Constructions<br />

Wholesale and retail<br />

trade, consumer, motorcar<br />

and motorcycle<br />

services 103 79 21 3<br />

Hotels and restaurants 10 6 4<br />

Transportation<br />

management,<br />

warehouses and<br />

communication<br />

Financial activity 20 20<br />

Real estate finance, and<br />

commercial activity<br />

Executive personnel,<br />

self-defense and<br />

mandatory insurance 1 1<br />

Education 1 1<br />

Public health and social<br />

services 32 1 31<br />

Other social and<br />

personal services 238 32 66 85 55<br />

Housing and communal<br />

services<br />

Exterritorial<br />

organisations<br />

Registered job seekers - 21841<br />

Workers 7782 695 1765 106 2706 2510<br />

Specialists 9237 3170 1211 1092 2050 1714<br />

Technical staff 4822 534 1148 432 2186 522<br />

Primary education 9 7 2<br />

General education 107 4 7 96<br />

Full secondary<br />

education 8010 671 1799 346 2815 2379<br />

Primary training<br />

education 114 10 76 19 2 7<br />

Secondary training<br />

education 4909 829 888 383 2028 781<br />

High/ university<br />

education 8538 2878 1354 798 2049 1459


More careful observation of the trends on the local labor market is also carried out in the<br />

districts of Tbilisi. Its results show that every year there are less registered vacancies and,<br />

at the same time, there are fewer job seekers. It results from the fact that people find jobs<br />

outside the labor market institutions operating in Tbilisi. The districts where workers are<br />

most looked for are Saburtalo-Vake oraz Didube-Chuhureti, while the district where the<br />

number of job seekers is the highest (several times more than in other parts of the city) is<br />

Isani-Samgori. It is worth mentioning that it is the district with the largest share of people<br />

in productive age.<br />

Key conclusions for the demography part:<br />

1. Positive demographic trends – since the middle of 1990s the number of residents<br />

has been systematically growing and over 65% of each district’s population are<br />

people in productive age.<br />

2. The metropolitan area of the City of Tbilisi (cities of Gardabani, Mccheta, Rustavi<br />

and rayons of Gardabani and Mccheta) is surrounded by towns with high potential<br />

of population in productive age. The educational structure of Tbilisi is dominated by<br />

people in their productive age educated on the secondary and higher level.<br />

3. The ethnic structure of the city is getting less diversified with the growing share of<br />

people of Georgian origin.<br />

4. The number of the employed decreases while there are more and more<br />

unemployed people.<br />

5. The level of women’s salaries is lower than the salary level in individual sectors. A<br />

significant rise in pay has been observed in few sectors (constructions, hotels<br />

restaurants, trade).<br />

6. The share of non-registered („grey zone”) businesses in the city’s economy<br />

exceeds 33%.<br />

7. The number of schools falls, which is the effect of the decreasing number of<br />

children in primary schools. It signals the change in current demographic trends in<br />

the city and the decrease in local population in the future.<br />

8. There are too many teachers employed in the system of education.<br />

9. The number of state and private university students is growing, especially at the<br />

faculties teaching engineering and construction, which partly results from the<br />

recent growth of manufacturing and construction industries in Tbilisi.<br />

10. Official statistics concerning staff turnover show that there are more people<br />

seeking jobs than the labor market can provide. The sectors where demand is the<br />

highest include commerce and constructions.<br />

11. Number of the unemployed officially registered in job centers is much lower than<br />

the total actual number of the unemployed, which mainly was as a result of<br />

insufficient interest of the unemployed citizens in receiving official unemployed<br />

status. It also shows that job centers do not play an important role on the labour<br />

market and do not offer desired services to the workforce and entrepreneurs. In<br />

the future they should take much more initiative in serving individuals that are<br />

looking for job or new qualifications as well as entrepreneurs looking for qualified<br />

workers. It is important to remember that job centers are key players in the<br />

development of workforce programs.


1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Entities – total 8411 30701 35327 41316 47632 56571<br />

of which:<br />

Agriculture, hunting and forestry 202 216 219 229 239<br />

Fishing 9 9 11 11 12<br />

Mining and quarrying 66 72 73 75 80<br />

Manufacturing 1169* 3716 3875 4060 4356 4704<br />

Electricity, gas and water supply 78 90 91 95 98<br />

Constructions 582 1299 1383 1435 1517 1639<br />

Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles,<br />

motorcycles and personal and household goods 4788 15193 18554 23384 28033 35042<br />

Hotels and restaurants 938 980 1042 1124 1239<br />

Transport, storage and communication 256 2119 2230 2294 2370 2521<br />

Financial intermediation 440 465 475 515 545<br />

Real estate, renting and business activities 2340 2535 2674 2860 3130<br />

Public administration and defense; compulsory social<br />

security 295 320 332 346 377<br />

Education 477 529 559 599 625<br />

Health and social work 778 818 859 893 942<br />

Other community, social and personal service activities 1616 2740 3239 3796 4597 5365<br />

Private households with employed persons 6 6 6 6 6<br />

Extra-territorial organizations and bodies 5 6 6 6 7<br />

<br />

<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Tbilisi - total 30701 35327 41316 47632 56571<br />

of which:<br />

Gldani-Nadzaladevi 5105 5890 6919 7675 8296<br />

Didube-Chugureti 7839 8937 10342 11819 14578<br />

Vake-Saburtalo 8841 10298 12398 14405 16358<br />

Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi 4435 5376 5925 6635 8116<br />

Isani-Samgori 4481 4826 5732 7098 9223<br />

<br />

Since the late 1990s the number of companies in Tbilisi, mainly the private ones, has<br />

dynamically grown. As the above tables show the highest dynamics can be observed in<br />

such sectors as industry, manufacturing, commerce and services. This tendency results<br />

from the introduction of market economy and the trend is present in the whole country. In<br />

2000 – 2004 in almost all the city districts the number of companies doubled.


2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Entities – total 30701 35327 41316 47632 56571 71351<br />

Entities of private law - total 30145 34726 40657 46938 55838 70603<br />

Commercial legal persons 14302 15827 17492 19476 22338 25585<br />

Joint liability companies 198 203 209 213 225 240<br />

Limited partnerships 5 6 8 10 14 21<br />

Limited liability companies 13601 15068 16689 18609 21371 24506<br />

Joint stock companies 461 512 548 604 686 774<br />

Cooperatives 37 38 38 40 42 44<br />

Non-commercial legal persons 1761 2327 2829 3425 3870 3962<br />

Unions (associations) 1249 1648 2049 2617 3052 3129<br />

Funds 512 679 780 808 818 833<br />

Individual enterprises 12635 15011 18708 22313 27816 39194<br />

Branches, representatives, etc. 1447 1561 1628 1724 1814 1862<br />

Entities of public law – total 556 601 659 694 733 748<br />

<br />

The increasing number of businesses is observed in all legal forms of entrepreneurship. The<br />

number of firms listed on the stock exchange has been growing. They are typically the most<br />

dynamically expanding companies with high future potential.<br />

<br />

<br />

In ths people 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Employment 725,0 761,9 743,8 737,4 708,7 681,7 723,8 722,4<br />

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 33,6 34,7 34,8 17,2 17,8 17,8 36,7 33,8<br />

Mining and quarrying 7,5 5,4 5,3 3,6 2,9 5,2 4,4 4,0<br />

Manufacturing 84,7 95,3 96,7 89,5 78,9 66,7 80,1 77,1<br />

Electricity, gas, water supply 17,8 22,4 20,6 28,8 29,1 28,4 22,5 24,3<br />

Constructions 12,4 20,3 20,9 25,4 19,8 21,8 32,2 30,2<br />

Trade and Utilities 63,4 61,5 74,6 72,5 65,4 68,0 77,7 75,9<br />

Hotels and Restaurants 8,5 13,2 13,2 14,8 20,6 17,0 13,6 14,5<br />

Transport and storage, communications 52,5 59,5 55,6 59,2 63,8 58,6 58,3 55,1<br />

Financial Intermediation 10,0 12,4 10,5 13,5 8,6 8,4 11,1 13,5<br />

Research and planning 36,6 34,6 36,2 24,0 18,6 19,6 24,9 28,1<br />

Public administration, defense 102,9 112,4 105,8 105,7 108,2 108,7 104,6 102,9<br />

Education 151,2 144,4 136,2 141,2 146,4 140,8 142,1 148,5<br />

Health care and social services 91,9 85,4 77,2 89,0 81,2 69,5 60,3 58,0<br />

Other community, social and personal 36,5 43,3 39,3 39,7 38,7 44,0 47,3 47,1<br />

service activities<br />

Private households with employed 14,1 15,0 15,0 7,1 7,1 6,1 4,9 4,9<br />

persons<br />

Ex- territorial organizations 1,6 2,0 1,8 1,6 1,6 1,3 3,1 4,6


In thds people<br />

Employment, of which<br />

Budgetary<br />

organizations<br />

State<br />

owned<br />

enterprises<br />

Enterprise or<br />

organization<br />

without<br />

foreign<br />

participation<br />

Joint<br />

venture or<br />

international<br />

organization<br />

Self employed, of<br />

which<br />

Other Employers Self<br />

employed<br />

outside<br />

agriculture<br />

2002 Total 109.5 33.0 161.9 10.9 3.6 11.4 64.7<br />

Women 68.2 13.5 64.5 4.8 2.0 1.7 24.8<br />

2003 Total 113.5 35.4 153.4 11.1 0.4 7.0 59.7<br />

Women 68.8 14.1 56.7 4.2 0.1 1.8 23.4<br />

2004 Total 98.7 39.4 162.1 13.2 2.1 9.5 62.8<br />

Women 62.2 20.0 65.4 3.2 0.5 1.7 21.1<br />

2005 Total 103.0 34.7 154.6 12.0 0.7 10.3 53.2<br />

Women 61.6 16.0 62.5 3.2 0.3 2.2 18.8<br />

<br />

The transformation of local economy is also illustrated by the employment structure in companies.<br />

The largest share in the job market belongs to enterprises or organizations without foreign<br />

participation. Government organisations still employ half of all employees, but for the last three<br />

years their labour market share has been systematically shrinking.<br />

<br />

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Average monthly<br />

wages (in GEL):<br />

Total in the country 52,1 67,1 76,8 83,6 90,6 103,6 107,2 118,3<br />

economy<br />

In the state sector 43,9 55,3 62,1 63,9 70,4 75,2 78,8 91,4<br />

In the private sector 56,6 73,0 83,9 93,5 102,0 120,0 122,0 132,8<br />

Average monthly<br />

wages (in GEL):<br />

In industry 63,8 80,6 86,7 94,0 115,1 138,4 127,3 142,1<br />

In agriculture 36,7 41,5 51,6 89,0 82,7 81,1 82,7 76,4<br />

In service sector 50,4 65,0 75,2 80,8 86,0 96,8 103,9 114,0<br />

In banking financial<br />

sector<br />

87,1 102,2 131,4 100,6 107,6 177,1 158,6 216,7<br />

Employment (in<br />

thousands of people)<br />

Total in the country 725,0 761,9 743,8 1064,5 708,7 681,7 723,8 722,4<br />

economy<br />

In industry 110,0 123,2 122,6 121,9 110,9 100,3 107,0 105,3<br />

In agriculture 33,6 34,7 34,8 17,2 17,8 17,8 36,7 33,8<br />

In service sector 571,4 591,6 575,8 911,9 571,4 555,2 568,9 569,8<br />

In banking financial<br />

sector<br />

10,0 12,4 10,5 13,5 8,6 8,4 11,1 13,5


Years<br />

Of which by:<br />

Total<br />

investments budgetary non-budgetary individual builders<br />

foreign<br />

investments<br />

Mln. lari (at actual prices)<br />

2000 230.9 26.1 63.9 50.0 90.9<br />

2001 294.2 12.3 96.5 23.8 161.6<br />

2002 314.5 12.0 185.8 61.4 55.3<br />

2003 253.7 20.2 119.3 49.8 64.4<br />

2004 859.9 37.8 145.6 24.8 651.7<br />

In % to the previous year<br />

2000 186.2 78.1 287.8 103.3 454.5<br />

2001 127.4 47.1 151.0 47.6 177.8<br />

2002 106.9 97.6 192.5 258.0 34.2<br />

2003 80.7 168.3 64.2 81.1 116.5<br />

2004 338.9 187.1 122.0 49.8 1011.9<br />

<br />

The city owes the significant 2003-2004 investment growth mainly to foreign investments. The<br />

level of inside investments has not changed considerably since the early 2000 and stays at 150<br />

mln GEL.


Units 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Entities – total 4626 5989 6316 8939<br />

Of which: 0 0 0 0<br />

Agriculture, hunting and forestry 14 3 10 10<br />

Fishing 0 2 0 1<br />

Mining and quarrying 6 1 2 5<br />

Manufacturing 159 185 296 348<br />

Electricity, gas and water supply 12 1 4 3<br />

Constructions 84 52 82 122<br />

Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles,<br />

motorcycles and personal and household goods 3361 4830 4649 7009<br />

Hotels and restaurants 42 62 82 115<br />

Transport, storage and communication 111 64 76 151<br />

Financial intermediation 25 10 40 30<br />

Real estate, renting and business activities 195 139 186 270<br />

Public administration and defense; compulsory social<br />

security 25 12 14 31<br />

Education 52 30 40 26<br />

Health and social work 40 41 34 49<br />

Other community, social and personal service activities 499 557 801 768<br />

Private households with employed persons 0 0 0 0<br />

Extra-territorial organizations and bodies 1 0 0 1<br />

<br />

From the city’s economic policy point of view the dynamics and industrial structure of new<br />

businesses are extremely important.<br />

In each of the analysed years the number of businesses set up in Tbilisi grew. The only industry<br />

where this dynamics has been slowing down is electricity, gas and water supply, but this area is<br />

strongly controlled by the state and free market principles are non-existent there. Another such<br />

area includes agriculture, hunting and forestry, i.e. industries that are not technologically<br />

advanced and therefore not attractive. The third sector of poor dynamics is education. In this case<br />

the reason for slower growth of businesses is heavy saturation of the market with traditional<br />

educational services (schools, universities). The number of businesses in other areas is<br />

increasing. Thus it seems necessary to carry out further research in order to answer the question<br />

how long newly established companies can survive and how they will develop in the future.


Georgian exports are partially concentrated on low value-added commodities such as<br />

ferrous metals, copper, aluminum, iron steel and mineral fuels ( see table 7.1 – chapter 7<br />

appendices). However, the dynamics of export seems to indicate that the concentration of<br />

exports on low value-added commodities will decrease gradually over time.<br />

<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Exports (million USD) 152 199 240 192 238 330 320 348 444 298<br />

Imports (million USD) 395 687 942 880 602 651 684 731 1,058 765<br />

Trade balance (million -243 -488 -702 -688 -364 -321 -364 -383 -614 - 467<br />

USD)<br />

<br />

Imports are dominated by mineral products (mainly including natural gas, oil and oil<br />

products), and electricity, which indicates the dependence of Georgia on foreign energy.<br />

In 2003 imports increased by 45% in USD, reflecting the need for imported goods for the<br />

construction of the Baku- Tbilisi- Ceikhan (BTC) pipeline.<br />

In 2004 exports increased by 66% compared with the same period of 2003, while imports<br />

increased by 57%. Such significant growth in trade turnover is a result of anti- corruption<br />

measures implemented by the Georgian Government, which brought about a stricter<br />

control of import and export flows. The share of the ten main trade partners in the total<br />

registered trade turnover was about 73,4%. The main partners in the last 10 years were<br />

Russia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and the UK.<br />

<br />

USD ths Percent<br />

Total imports 1057793 100<br />

Petroleum oils and oils from bituminous minerals 102543 9,7<br />

Tubes and pipes 93,723 8,9<br />

Petroleum gases 65,99 6,2<br />

Medicines 51,56 4,9<br />

Sugar 50,58 4,8<br />

Motor cars and other motor vehicles 44,51 4,2<br />

Electric energy 21,51 2,0<br />

Tobacco and manufactured tobacco substitutes 19,80 1,9<br />

Steam turbines and other vapour turbines and thereof 17,72 1,7<br />

Aircraft powered, spacecraft ( including satellites) and spacecraft<br />

launch vehicles 16,94 1,6<br />

Other 572,89 54,2<br />

<br />

In 2003 imports were dominated by mineral products. The figures in Table 3 demonstrate<br />

Georgia’s continuing dependence on foreign energy. The import of petroleum, gas, oil,<br />

and electrical energy together represented about 18% of total recorded imports. The<br />

import of articles of iron and steel (mainly pipes for the BTC construction) was the second<br />

largest item, with a value of USD 93,7 million. Imports of pharmaceutical products<br />

accounted for 5% of recorded imports. The share of imported food (wheat, flour) and<br />

tobacco was slowly decreasing. Table ( Composition of registered imports) indicates that<br />

the largest imported product groups together constituted about 46% of total imports in<br />

2003.


( in percent of total 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Export 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Russia 29,1 20,8 20,8 23,3 17,7 18,2 16,2 17,8<br />

Turkey 11,3 15,4 22,6 22,0 15,5 17,9 18,3 14,1<br />

Azerbaijan 7,5 4,3 6,2 3,1 8,5 3,6 3,9 9,6<br />

Armenia 9,7 6,6 4,2 3,9 5,8 6,7 8,4 4,6<br />

Germany 6,7 11,0 10,6 2,4 1,6 2,1 2,5 3,3<br />

Unites States 5,9 4,4 2,2 2,8 3,9 3,3 3,3 3,1<br />

Italy 5,0 4,7 3,7 2,7 2,2 1,9 1,8 3,9<br />

Ukraine 3,9 4,6 3,4 3,6 3,7 6,5 2,4 4,4<br />

France 3,3 0,3 0,3 0,1 0,9 1,1 1,5 1,3<br />

Switzerland 2,9 2,5 4,1 4,9 7,0 7,2 2,7 0,4<br />

Netherlands 1,8 1,0 0,6 1,1 1,3 2,1 1,5 1,3<br />

Bulgaria 1,7 0,2 0,7 0,2 0,0 0,0 2,4 4,9<br />

Others 11,1 24,2 20,4 29,9 32,0 29,4 35,1 31,4<br />

<br />

The main market for Georgian products is still the CIS. Turkey is a destination for 16% of<br />

Georgian exports. The EU’s share is about same. During the past few years the CIS and<br />

the EU have accounted for more than 70% of Georgia’s registered imports. Turkey has<br />

accounted for another 10%. Imports from the USA were relatively small.<br />

Several factors and parameters related to the prospective economic development of the<br />

country provide sufficient grounds for dynamic expansion of export and import flows in<br />

Georgia.<br />

However, Georgia needs to diversify its export markets, which seems eminently possible<br />

through full utilisation of its multilateral and bilateral trade arrangements as well as<br />

through the production of internationally competitive products.<br />

<br />

In 2005, the foreign trade turnover was USD 3,357.6 million, which is 34.6% more than in<br />

2004. Export was USD 866.7 million (increased with 34.0%) and import USD 2,490.9<br />

million (increased with 34.8%). The negative trade balance increased with 35.2% to USD<br />

-1,624.2 million.<br />

In 2005 Georgia had a negative trade balance with 101 partner states (104 in 2004), with<br />

a combined trade deficit of USD 1,687.5 million (USD 1,321.4 in 2004). A positive trade<br />

balance was recorded with 31 states (21 in 2004), with a total surplus of USD 63.3 million<br />

(in 2004 USD 120.5 million).<br />

In 2005 the share of foreign trade with CIS countries increased. The foreign trade<br />

turnover with CIS countries reached USD 1,406.1 million (42.8% higher than in 2004) and<br />

was 41.9% of total trade turnover. The foreign trade turnover with EU countries was USD<br />

836.7 million, which is 14.8% higher than last year’s. The trade turnover with EU countries<br />

was 24.9% of the total trade turnover.<br />

Russia is the most important trade partner of Georgia. In 2005, the trade turnover with<br />

Russia increased with 48.6% and reached USD 538.3 million, which is 16.0% of the total<br />

foreign trade turnover. The next important partners are Turkey (12.1% of foreign trade),<br />

Azerbaijan (9.4%) and Ukraine (7.7%).<br />

No significant changes occurred last year in the export-import commodity structure.<br />

In export, the most important commodities were black scrap metals (with a share in total<br />

export of 9.7%), natural wine (9.4%), ferroalloys (9.3%), nuts (8.1%) and aircrafts (8.0%).<br />

In import, the most important commodities were oil and oil products (13.5%), followed by<br />

automobiles (7.2%).


Railroad Motovehicles Marine Air Total<br />

1997 7,2 12,2 300<br />

1998 8,4 15 625<br />

1999 9,4 16 419<br />

2000 11,5 18,5 63 13 30,0<br />

2001 13,2 20,0 31 12 33,2<br />

2002 14,9 22,5 36 13 37,4<br />

2003 16,6 24,5 21 13 41,0<br />

2004 15,4 25,7 29 16 41,1<br />

2005 18,9 26,9 24 16 45,8<br />

<br />

Georgian railway<br />

The Georgian railway is one of the crucial links in Eurasian transit and serves as a shortcut<br />

linking Europe and Central Asia. The Georgian railway system directly links the<br />

railway systems of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia. Railway- ferry lines from Batumi and<br />

Poti Black Sea ports directly connect the Caucasus and Central Asia with the Black Sea<br />

regions.<br />

To maintain the volume of freight flow on the Georgian railway and attract additional<br />

freight, volume-based and preferential tariffs are applied. For example, the volume-based<br />

tariff on transit of crude oil is 5 USD per ton and on transit of oil products it is 7 USD per<br />

ton.<br />

To ensure effective use of the Georgian transit corridor and attract additional freight, the<br />

Government of Georgia actively cooperates with neighboring countries. A Poti - Baku-<br />

Aktau - Almaty container train to which preferential tariffs will apply, will begin operation in<br />

2006. Via this train export traffic to the territory of Kazakhstan is 0,22 USD per<br />

container/km, and import traffic is 0,28 USD per container/km. Transit traffic through the<br />

territories of Georgia and Azerbaijan is 0,28 USD per container/km.<br />

<br />

years Volume of cargo ( in millions of tons) Number of passengers in millions<br />

1995 4.6 1.7<br />

1996 4.8 1.9<br />

1997 7.2 1.9<br />

1998 8.5 2.3<br />

1999 9.5 1.9<br />

2000 11.5 2.3<br />

2001 13.1 2.1<br />

2002 14.9 2.1<br />

2003 16.4 2.2<br />

2004 15.5 3.0<br />

2005 8.3 1.4


local transit import export<br />

1995 1.2 2.0 0.3 0.9<br />

1996 1.4 2.1 0.7 0.5<br />

1997 1.6 3.1 1.5 0.8<br />

1998 1.2 5.5 1.3 0.4<br />

1999 1.4 6.8 0.6 0.5<br />

2000 1.7 8.4 0.6 0.6<br />

2001 1.8 10.1 0.7 0.4<br />

2002 2.0 11.6 0.8 0.5<br />

2003 2.4 12.1 1.1 0.8<br />

2004 2.0 10.7 1.6 0.9<br />

2005 (6-months) 0.8 6.1 0.9 0.4<br />

<br />

<br />

Years<br />

Road transportation volume of cargo<br />

(in millions of tons)<br />

Rail cargo volume of cargo<br />

( in millions of tons)<br />

1998 15.0 8.5<br />

1999 16.0 9.5<br />

2000 18.5 11.5<br />

2001 20.0 13.1<br />

2002 22.5 14.9<br />

2003 24 16.6<br />

2004 15.4<br />

2006 (months) 8.3<br />

<br />

Civil Aviation<br />

<br />

Number of passengers Number of connections Volume of cargo ( in tons)<br />

International domestic International domestic International domestic<br />

1995 4236 43 3794 1699<br />

2000 27001 6004 6044 1526 7530<br />

2003 314867 3419 7014 1130 4907<br />

2004 39501 7386 8542 1476 5848<br />

2005 536418 10742 9650 1612 6274<br />

<br />

At present 4 national and 13 foreign regular airlines, including Austrian airlines, British<br />

Airlines, Lufthansa and Turkish airlines are operating in Georgia. Direct air connections<br />

are available from Tbilisi to Vienna, Zurich, Athens, Paris, Prague, Berlin, Munich,<br />

Frankfurt, Istanbul, Moscow, St. Petersburg. In 2005, Georgia processed 260,000 air<br />

passengers and 1.6 thousand tons of air cargo. 98% of air transportation is performed by<br />

Tbilisi International Airport.<br />

In 1994 Georgia became a member of International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO),<br />

and in 2005 a member of the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC).


Key conclusions on the economic performance:<br />

1. Since the late 1990s the number of companies in Tbilisi, mainly the private ones, has<br />

dynamically grown. The highest dynamics can be observed in such sectors as<br />

industry, manufacturing, commerce and services.<br />

2. The number of firms listed on the stock exchange has been growing. They are<br />

typically the most dynamically expanding companies with high future potential.<br />

3. The city owes the significant 2003-2004 investment growth mainly to foreign<br />

investments.<br />

4. In Tbilisi number of newly opened businesses has been growing each year.<br />

5. Imports are dominated by raw materials (mainly natural gas, oil and oil products), and<br />

electricity, which indicates the dependence of Georgia on foreign energy. In 2003<br />

imports increased by 45% in USD as a result of the demand for imported goods<br />

needed for the construction of Baku- Tbilisi- Ceikhan (BTC) pipeline.<br />

6. What seems to have a particularly negative impact is the deficit in foreign exchange<br />

that results from larger imports than exports and reflexes the inefficiency of local<br />

economy in satisfying the local market. The export structure is dominated by raw<br />

materials and unprocessed goods, which neither generates jobs nor stimulates<br />

income growth in the City as well as in the country as it would happen if the<br />

processing sector was more advanced.<br />

7. The impact of market economy transformations has been most apparent in the city<br />

economy which is mainly demonstrated by staff flow from public to private sector, the<br />

increased number of businesses and growing popularity of self-employment.<br />

8. Tbilisi job market covers almost 50% of jobs in the whole country and staff turnover is<br />

stimulated by the systematically growing level of salaries which are now higher in the<br />

private sector.<br />

9. The number of people employed in industry has been falling, while services generate<br />

more jobs every year.<br />

10. The situation of local economy is also reflected in the transport sector where export<br />

has a rather small share while transit transport (both road and railway transport, which<br />

results from the country’s specific geographical position) is getting more and more<br />

significant.<br />

11. The growth of air transport is generated mainly by international flights. National flights<br />

have remained at the same level since 2000. Such situation results from the fact that<br />

the airport has joined several international aviation organisations and associations,<br />

which forced them to restructure and adjust service levels to standards required by<br />

their international partners’.


After the collapse of Soviet Union Tbilisi is back on the way to its natural role in the<br />

region as city on transportation paths between Europe and Asia. As it is was also in the<br />

history Tbilisi is competing with Baku and Yerevan to be Caucasian key urban center for<br />

international relations and services. In spite of development of cooperation and new<br />

transportation connections with Turkey can be observed there are now big cities that can<br />

compete with Tbilisi in the eastern part of Turkey. Tbilisi doesn’t have competitors in the<br />

North because of relations with Russia and situation in Northern Caucasus. Situation in<br />

Central Asia is more important for role of Tbilisi in the wider region. Dynamic changes in<br />

the Central Asiatic countries create a new position of their cites. New economic situation<br />

create a Kazakhstan and both its cities Astana and Almaty as regional leaders and key<br />

regional urban centers. In result looking for Tbilisi regional role, Georgian capitol will<br />

compete with mainly with Baku and Yerevan and Astana with Almaty.<br />

Because of lack of current comparative data on cities, first report present some data on<br />

neighboring countries and assessment of Tbilisi role is presented in report two when city<br />

competitive factors are discussed.


Population: 142,893,540<br />

Age structure:<br />

0-14 years: 14.2% (male 10,441,151/female 9,921,102)<br />

15-64 years: 71.3% (male 49,271,698/female 52,679,463)<br />

65 years and over: 14.4% (male 6,500,814/female 14,079,312) (2006 est.)<br />

GDP<br />

GDP - purchasing power parity - 1.559 trillion USD<br />

GDP - official exchange rate - 763,7 billion USD<br />

GDP - per capita (PPP) - 10,640 USD<br />

public debt - 12,9 % of GDP<br />

population below poverty line - 17,80%<br />

Budget – gov. (2005)<br />

Revenues: 176,7 billion USD<br />

Expenditures: 125,6 billion USD<br />

Inflation rate 12.7%<br />

Unemployment rate 7.6% plus considerable<br />

underemployment (2005 est.)<br />

Administrative divisions: 48 oblasts (oblastey, singular - oblast), 21 republics (respublik,<br />

singular - respublika), 9 autonomous okrugs (avtonomnykh okrugov, singular -<br />

avtonomnyy okrug), 7 krays (krayev, singular - kray), 2 federal cities (singular - gorod),<br />

and 1 autonomous oblast (avtonomnaya oblast'), note: administrative divisions have the<br />

same names as their administrative centers (the exceptions have the administrative<br />

center name following in parentheses)<br />

Russia ended 2005 with its seventh straight year of growth, averaging 6.4% annually<br />

since the financial crisis of 1998. Although high oil prices and a relatively cheap ruble are<br />

important drivers of this economic rebound, since 2000 investment and consumer-driven<br />

demand have played a noticeably increasing role. Real fixed capital investments have<br />

averaged gains greater than 10% over the last five years, and real personal incomes<br />

have realized average increases over 12%. During this time, poverty has declined<br />

steadily and the middle class has continued to expand. Russia has also improved its<br />

international financial position since the 1998 financial crisis, with its foreign debt declining<br />

from 90% of GDP to around 31%. Strong oil export earnings have allowed Russia to<br />

increase its foreign reserves from only $12 billion to some $180 billion at yearend 2005.<br />

These achievements, along with a renewed government effort to advance structural<br />

reforms, have raised business and investor confidence in Russia's economic prospects.<br />

Nevertheless, serious problems persist. Economic growth slowed to 5.9% for 2005 while<br />

inflation remains high. Oil, natural gas, metals, and timber account for more than 80% of<br />

exports, leaving the country vulnerable to swings in world prices. Russia's manufacturing<br />

base is dilapidated and must be replaced or modernized if the country is to achieve<br />

broad-based economic growth. Other problems include a weak banking system, a poor<br />

business climate that discourages both domestic and foreign investors, corruption, and<br />

widespread lack of trust in institutions. In addition, a string of investigations launched


against a major Russian oil company, culminating with the arrest of its CEO in the fall of<br />

2003 and the acquisition of the company by a state owned firm, have raised concerns by<br />

some observers that President PUTIN is granting more influence to forces within his<br />

government that desire to reassert state control over the economy. State control has<br />

increased in the past year with a number of large acquisitions. Most fundamentally,<br />

Russia has made little progress in building the rule of law, the bedrock of a modern<br />

market economy.<br />

<br />

Population: 15,233,244 (July 2006 est.)<br />

Age structure:<br />

0-14 years: 23% (male 1,792,685/female 1,717,294)<br />

15-64 years: 68.8% (male 5,122,027/female 5,357,819)<br />

65 years and over: 8.2% (male 438,541/female 804,878) (2006 est.)<br />

GDP<br />

GDP - purchasing power parity - 128.9 billion USD<br />

GDP - official exchange rate - 56.08 billion USD<br />

GDP - per capita (PPP) - 7,730 USD<br />

public debt - 10.5% of GDP<br />

population below poverty line - 19 %<br />

Budget – gov. (2005)<br />

Revenues: 12.19 billion USD<br />

Expenditures: 12.44 billion billion USD<br />

Inflation rate 7,6 %<br />

Unemployment rate 8.1% (2005)<br />

Administrative divisions: 14 provinces (oblystar, singular - oblys) and 3 cities* (qala,<br />

singular - qalasy); Almaty Oblysy, Almaty Qalasy*, Aqmola Oblysy (Astana), Aqtobe<br />

Oblysy, Astana Qalasy*, Atyrau Oblysy, Batys Qazaqstan Oblysy (Oral), Bayqongyr<br />

Qalasy*, Mangghystau Oblysy (Aqtau), Ongtustik Qazaqstan Oblysy (Shymkent),<br />

Pavlodar Oblysy, Qaraghandy Oblysy, Qostanay Oblysy, Qyzylorda Oblysy, Shyghys<br />

Qazaqstan Oblysy (Oskemen), Soltustik Qazaqstan Oblysy (Petropavlovsk), Zhambyl<br />

Oblysy (Taraz), note: administrative divisions have the same names as their<br />

administrative centers (the exceptions have the administrative center name following in<br />

parentheses); in 1995, the Governments of Kazakhstan and Russia entered into an<br />

agreement whereby Russia would lease for a period of 20 years an area of 6,000 sq km<br />

enclosing the Baykonur space launch facilities and the city of Bayqongyr (Baykonur,<br />

formerly Leninsk); in 2004 a new agreement extended the lease to 2050.


Population: 46,710,816 (July 2006 est.)<br />

Age structure:<br />

0-14 years: 14.1% (male 3,377,868/female 3,203,738)<br />

15-64 years: 69.3% (male 15,559,998/female 16,831,486)<br />

65 years and over: 16.6% (male 2,635,651/female 5,102,075) (2006 est.)<br />

GDP<br />

GDP - purchasing power parity - 320.5 billion USD<br />

GDP - official exchange rate - 81.66 billion USD<br />

GDP - per capita (PPP) - 6,720 USD<br />

public debt - 17 % of GDP<br />

population below poverty line - 29 %<br />

Budget – gov. (2005)<br />

Revenues: 23,59 billion USD<br />

Expenditures: 22.98 billion USD; note - this is the consolidated budget<br />

Inflation rate 13.5 %<br />

Unemployment rate 3,1 %<br />

Administrative divisions: 24 provinces (oblasti, singular - oblast'), 1 autonomous republic*<br />

(avtonomna respublika), and 2 municipalities (mista, singular - misto) with oblast status**;<br />

Cherkasy, Chernihiv, Chernivtsi, Crimea or Avtonomna Respublika Krym* (Simferopol'),<br />

Dnipropetrovs'k, Donets'k, Ivano-Frankivs'k, Kharkiv, Kherson, Khmel'nyts'kyy,<br />

Kirovohrad, Kiev (Kyyiv)**, Kyyiv, Luhans'k, L'viv, Mykolayiv, Odesa, Poltava, Rivne,<br />

Sevastopol', Sumy, Ternopil', Vinnytsya, Volyn' (Luts'k), Zakarpattya (Uzhhorod),<br />

Zaporizhzhya, Zhytomyr note: administrative divisions have the same names as their<br />

administrative centers (the exceptions have the administrative center name following in<br />

parentheses).


Population: 4,661,473 (July 2006 est.)<br />

Age structure:<br />

0-14 years: 17.3% (male 428,056/female 380,193)<br />

15-64 years: 66.2% (male 1,482,908/female 1,602,064)<br />

65 years and over: 16.5% (male 308,905/female 459,347) (2006 est.)<br />

GDP<br />

GDP - purchasing power parity - 14.21 billion USD<br />

GDP - official exchange rate - 6.39 billion USD<br />

GDP - per capita (PPP) - 3,270 USD<br />

public debt - 17 % of GDP<br />

population below poverty line - 54 %<br />

Budget – gov. (2005)<br />

Revenues: 1.43 billion USD<br />

Expenditures: 1.56 billion billion USD<br />

Inflation rate 8,2 %<br />

Unemployment rate 12,6% (2005)<br />

9 regions (mkharebi, singular - mkhare), 9 cities (k'alak'ebi, singular - k'alak'i), and 2<br />

autonomous republics (avtomnoy respubliki, singular - avtom respublika) regions: Guria,<br />

Imereti, Kakheti, Kvemo Kartli, Mtskheta-Mtianeti, Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti,<br />

Samegrelo and Zemo Svaneti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Shida Kartli cities: Chiat'ura, Gori,<br />

K'ut'aisi, P'ot'i, Rust'avi, T'bilisi, Tqibuli, Tsqaltubo, Zugdidi autonomous republics:<br />

Abkhazia or Ap'khazet'is Avtonomiuri Respublika (Sokhumi), Ajaria or Acharis<br />

Avtonomiuri Respublika (Batumi).<br />

Georgia's main economic activities include the cultivation of agricultural products such as<br />

grapes, citrus fruits, and hazelnuts; mining of manganese and copper; and output of a<br />

small industrial sector producing alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages, metals,<br />

machinery, and chemicals. The country imports the bulk of its energy needs, including<br />

natural gas and oil products. It has sizeable but underdeveloped hydropower capacity.<br />

Despite the severe damage the economy has suffered due to civil strife, Georgia, with the<br />

help of the IMF and World Bank, has made substantial economic gains since 2000,<br />

achieving positive GDP growth and curtailing inflation. Georgia had suffered from a<br />

chronic failure to collect tax revenues; however, the new government is making progress<br />

and has reformed the tax code, improved tax administration, increased tax enforcement,<br />

and cracked down on corruption. In addition, the reinvigorated privatization process has<br />

met with success, supplementing government expenditures on infrastructure, defense,<br />

and poverty reduction. Despite customs and financial (tax) enforcement improvements,<br />

smuggling is a drain on the economy. Georgia also suffers from energy shortages due to<br />

aging and badly maintained infrastructure, as well as poor management. Due to<br />

concerted reform efforts, collection rates have improved considerably to roughly 60%,<br />

both in T'bilisi and throughout the regions. Continued reform in the management of stateowned<br />

power entities is essential to successful privatization and onward sustainability in<br />

this sector. The country is pinning its hopes for long-term growth on its role as a transit


state for pipelines and trade. The construction on the Baku-T'bilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline and<br />

the Baku-T'bilisi-Erzerum gas pipeline have brought much-needed investment and job<br />

opportunities. Nevertheless, high energy prices in 2006 will compound the pressure on<br />

the country's inefficient energy sector. Restructuring the sector and finding energy supply<br />

alternatives to Russia remain major challenges.<br />

<br />

Population: 2,976,372 (July 2006 est.)<br />

Age structure:<br />

0-14 years: 20.5% (male 322,189/female 286,944)<br />

15-64 years: 68.4% (male 949,975/female 1,085,484)<br />

65 years and over: 11.1% (male 133,411/female 198,369) (2006 est.)<br />

GDP<br />

GDP - purchasing power parity - 15.12 billion USD<br />

GDP - official exchange rate - 4.903 billion USD<br />

GDP - per capita (PPP) - 5,060 USD<br />

population below poverty line - 43 %<br />

Budget – gov. (2005)<br />

Revenues: 786,1 million USD<br />

Expenditures: 930,7 million USD<br />

Inflation rate 0,6 %<br />

Unemployment rate 31,6% (2005)<br />

Administrative divisions: 11 provinces (marzer, singular - marz); Aragatsotn, Ararat,<br />

Armavir, Geghark'unik', Kotayk', Lorri, Shirak, Syunik', Tavush, Vayots' Dzor, Yerevan<br />

Under the old Soviet central planning system, Armenia had developed a modern<br />

industrial sector, supplying machine tools, textiles, and other manufactured goods to<br />

sister republics in exchange for raw materials and energy. Since the implosion of the<br />

USSR in December 1991, Armenia has switched to small-scale agriculture away from the<br />

large agroindustrial complexes of the Soviet era. The agricultural sector has long-term<br />

needs for more investment and updated technology. The privatization of industry has<br />

been at a slower pace, but has been given renewed emphasis by the current<br />

administration. Armenia is a food importer, and its mineral deposits (copper, gold, bauxite)<br />

are small. The ongoing conflict with Azerbaijan over the ethnic Armenian-dominated<br />

region of Nagorno-Karabakh and the breakup of the centrally directed economic system<br />

of the former Soviet Union contributed to a severe economic decline in the early 1990s.<br />

By 1994, however, the Armenian Government had launched an ambitious IMF-sponsored<br />

economic liberalization program that resulted in positive growth rates in 1995-2005.<br />

Armenia joined the WTO in January 2003. Armenia also has managed to slash inflation,<br />

stabilize its currency, and privatize most small- and medium-sized enterprises. Armenia's<br />

unemployment rate, however, remains high, despite strong economic growth. The chronic<br />

energy shortages Armenia suffered in the early and mid-1990s have been offset by the<br />

energy supplied by one of its nuclear power plants at Metsamor. Armenia is now a net<br />

energy exporter, although it does not have sufficient generating capacity to replace<br />

Metsamor, which is under international pressure to close. The electricity distribution


system was privatized in 2002. Armenia's severe trade imbalance has been offset<br />

somewhat by international aid, remittances from Armenians working abroad, and foreign<br />

direct investment. Economic ties with Russia remain close, especially in the energy<br />

sector. The government made some improvements in tax and customs administration in<br />

2005, but anti-corruption measures will be more difficult to implement. Investment in the<br />

construction and industrial sectors is expected to continue in 2006 and will help to ensure<br />

annual average real GDP growth of about 13.9%.<br />

<br />

Population: 7,961,619 (July 2006 est.)<br />

Age structure:<br />

0-14 years: 25.8% (male 1,046,501/female 1,011,492)<br />

15-64 years: 66.3% (male 2,573,134/female 2,706,275)<br />

65 years and over: 7.8% (male 246,556/female 377,661) (2006 est.)<br />

GDP<br />

GDP - purchasing power parity - 47.03 billion USD<br />

GDP - official exchange rate - 12.56 billion USD<br />

GDP - per capita (PPP) - 4,890 USD<br />

population below poverty line - 49 %<br />

Budget – gov. (2005)<br />

Revenues: 3.18 billion USD<br />

Expenditures: 2.986 billion USD<br />

Inflation rate 0,6 %<br />

Unemployment rate 1.1% official rate (2005)<br />

Azerbaijan's number one export is oil. Azerbaijan's oil production declined through 1997,<br />

but has registered an increase every year since. Negotiation of production-sharing<br />

arrangements (PSAs) with foreign firms, which have thus far committed $60 billion to<br />

long-term oilfield development, should generate the funds needed to spur future industrial<br />

development. Oil production under the first of these PSAs, with the Azerbaijan<br />

International Operating Company, began in November 1997. A consortium of Western oil<br />

companies is scheduled to begin pumping 1 million barrels a day from a large offshore<br />

field in early 2006, through a $4 billion pipeline it built from Baku to Turkey's<br />

Mediterranean port of Ceyhan. Economists estimate that by 2010 revenues from this<br />

project will double the country's current GDP. Azerbaijan shares all the formidable<br />

problems of the former Soviet republics in making the transition from a command to a<br />

market economy, but its considerable energy resources brighten its long-term prospects.<br />

Baku has only recently begun making progress on economic reform, and old economic<br />

ties and structures are slowly being replaced. Several other obstacles impede<br />

Azerbaijan's economic progress: the need for stepped up foreign investment in the nonenergy<br />

sector, the continuing conflict with Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh region,<br />

and the pervasive corruption. Trade with Russia and the other former Soviet republics is<br />

declining in importance while trade is building with Turkey and the nations of Europe.<br />

Long-term prospects will depend on world oil prices, the location of new pipelines in the<br />

region, and Azerbaijan's ability to manage its oil wealth.


Population: 5,213,898 (July 2006 est.)<br />

Age structure:<br />

Age structure: 0-14 years: 30.9% (male 821,976/female 789,687)<br />

15-64 years: 62.9% (male 1,607,396/female 1,669,612)<br />

65 years and over: 6.2% (male 126,847/female 198,380) (2006 est.)<br />

GDP<br />

GDP - purchasing power parity - 9.97 billion USD<br />

GDP - official exchange rate - 2.441 billion USD<br />

GDP - per capita (PPP) - 1,870 USD<br />

population below poverty line - 40 %<br />

Budget – gov. (2005)<br />

Revenues: 516.3 million USD<br />

Expenditures: 539.9 million USD<br />

Inflation rate 5,2 %<br />

Unemployment rate 18% official rate (2005)<br />

7 provinces (oblastlar, singular - oblasty) and 1 city* (shaar); Batken Oblasty, Bishkek<br />

Shaary*, Chuy Oblasty (Bishkek), Jalal-Abad Oblasty, Naryn Oblasty, Osh Oblasty, Talas<br />

Oblasty, Ysyk-Kol Oblasty (Karakol) note: administrative divisions have the same names<br />

as their administrative centers (exceptions have the administrative center name following<br />

in parentheses)<br />

Kyrgyzstan is a poor, mountainous country with a predominantly agricultural economy.<br />

Cotton, tobacco, wool, and meat are the main agricultural products, although only tobacco<br />

and cotton are exported in any quantity. Industrial exports include gold, mercury, uranium,<br />

natural gas, and electricity. Kyrgyzstan has been progressive in carrying out market<br />

reforms, such as an improved regulatory system and land reform. Kyrgyzstan was the<br />

first CIS country to be accepted into the World Trade Organization. Much of the<br />

government's stock in enterprises has been sold. Drops in production had been severe<br />

after the breakup of the Soviet Union in December 1991, but by mid-1995, production<br />

began to recover and exports began to increase. Kyrgyzstan has distinguished itself by<br />

adopting relatively liberal economic policies. The drop in output at the Kumtor gold mine<br />

sparked a 0.5% decline in GDP in 2002, but GDP growth bounced back in 2003-05. The<br />

government has made steady strides in controlling its substantial fiscal deficit and<br />

reduced the deficit to 1% of GDP in 2005. The government and international financial<br />

institutions have been engaged in a comprehensive medium-term poverty reduction and<br />

economic growth strategy, and in 2005 agreed to pursue much-needed tax reform.<br />

Progress fighting corruption, further restructuring of domestic industry, and success in<br />

attracting foreign investment are keys to future growth. Countrywide, official<br />

unemployment is 3%, but the actual rate is closer to 40% . Women account for 62% of<br />

those unemployed. Roughly 65% of Kyrgyz live in rural areas, and the majority of rural<br />

residents are farmers. The lack of adequately paid work in rural areas is prompting an<br />

out-migration to major cities like Bishkek, Osh and Jalal-Abad.


Population: 27,307,134 (July 2006 est.)<br />

Age structure:<br />

0-14 years: 32.9% (male 4,572,721/female 4,403,405)<br />

15-64 years: 62.3% (male 8,420,174/female 8,594,478)<br />

65 years and over: 4.8% (male 539,336/female 777,020) (2006 est.)<br />

GDP<br />

GDP - purchasing power parity - 53.87 billion USD<br />

GDP - official exchange rate - 13,66 billion USD<br />

GDP - per capita (PPP) - 2,020 USD<br />

population below poverty line - 28 %<br />

Budget – gov. (2005)<br />

Revenues: 2,815 billion USD<br />

Expenditures: 2,917 million USD<br />

Inflation rate 6,9 %<br />

Unemployment rate 0,7% (2005)<br />

Administrative divisions:<br />

12 provinces (viloyatlar, singular - viloyat), 1 autonomous republic (respublika), and 1 city<br />

(shahar); Andijon Viloyati, Buxoro Viloyati, Farg'ona Viloyati, Jizzax Viloyati, Namangan<br />

Viloyati, Navoiy Viloyati, Qashqadaryo Viloyati (Qarshi), Qoraqalpog'iston Respublikasi*<br />

(Nukus), Samarqand Viloyati, Sirdaryo Viloyati (Guliston), Surxondaryo Viloyati (Termiz),<br />

Toshkent Shahri**, Toshkent Viloyati, Xorazm Viloyati (Urganch)


Population: 7,320,815 (July 2006 est.)<br />

Age structure:<br />

0-14 years: 37.9% (male 1,396,349/female 1,375,168)<br />

15-64 years: 57.4% (male 2,091,476/female 2,108,889)<br />

65 years and over: 4.8% (male 154,162/female 194,771) (2006 est.)<br />

GDP<br />

GDP - purchasing power parity - 8.53 billion USD<br />

GDP - official exchange rate - 2.326 billion USD<br />

GDP - per capita (PPP) - 1,260 USD<br />

population below poverty line - 64 %<br />

Budget – gov. (2005)<br />

Revenues: 442.3 million USD<br />

Expenditures: 542.6 million USD<br />

Inflation rate 7,1 %<br />

Unemployment rate 12% (2005)<br />

Provinces (viloyatho, singular - viloyat) and 1 autonomous province* (viloyati mukhtor);<br />

Viloyati Khatlon (Qurghonteppa), Viloyati Mukhtori Kuhistoni Badakhshon* [Gorno-<br />

Badakhshan] (Khorugh), Viloyati Sughd (Khujand) note: the administrative center name<br />

follows in parentheses.<br />

Macroeconomic overviews<br />

Tajikistan has one of the lowest per capita GDPs among the 15 former Soviet republics.<br />

Only 6% of the land area is arable; cotton is the most important crop. Mineral resources,<br />

varied but limited in amount, include silver, gold, uranium, and tungsten. Industry consists<br />

only of a large aluminum plant, hydropower facilities, and small obsolete factories mostly<br />

in light industry and food processing. The civil war (1992-97) severely damaged the<br />

already weak economic infrastructure and caused a sharp decline in industrial and<br />

agricultural production. Even though 64% of its people continue to live in abject poverty,<br />

Tajikistan has experienced steady economic growth since 1997, but experienced a slight<br />

drop in its growth rate to 8% in 2005 from 10.6% in 2004. Continued privatization of<br />

medium and large state-owned enterprises would further increase productivity.<br />

Tajikistan's economic situation, however, remains fragile due to uneven implementation of<br />

structural reforms, weak governance, widespread unemployment, and the external debt<br />

burden. A debt restructuring agreement was reached with Russia in December 2002,<br />

including a $250 million write-off of Tajikistan's $300 million debt to Russia. Tajikistan<br />

ranks third in the world in terms of water resources per head. A proposed investment to<br />

finish the hydropower dams Rogun and Sangtuda would substantially add to electricity<br />

production. If finished, Rogun will be the world's tallest dam.


Population: 5,042,920 (July 2006 est.)<br />

Age structure:<br />

0-14 years: 35.2% (male 913,988/female 863,503)<br />

15-64 years: 60.7% (male 1,501,486/female 1,557,155)<br />

65 years and over: 4.1% (male 79,227/female 127,561) (2006 est.)<br />

GDP<br />

GDP - purchasing power parity - 39.54 billion USD<br />

GDP - official exchange rate - 6.77 billion USD<br />

GDP - per capita (PPP) - 8000 USD<br />

population below poverty line - 58 %<br />

Budget – gov. (2005)<br />

Revenues: 1.401 billion USD<br />

Expenditures: 1.542 billion USD<br />

Inflation rate 10,5 %<br />

Unemployment rate 60% (2005)<br />

5 provinces (welayatlar, singular - welayat): Ahal Welayaty (Ashgabat), Balkan Welayaty<br />

(Balkanabat), Dashoguz Welayaty, Lebap Welayaty (Turkmenabat), Mary Welayaty note:<br />

administrative divisions have the same names as their administrative centers (exceptions<br />

have the administrative center name following in parentheses)<br />

Turkmenistan is a largely desert country with intensive agriculture in irrigated oases and<br />

large gas and oil resources. One-half of its irrigated land is planted in cotton; formerly it<br />

was the world's tenth-largest producer. Poor harvests in recent years have led to an<br />

almost 50% decline in cotton exports. With an authoritarian ex-Communist regime in<br />

power and a tribally based social structure, Turkmenistan has taken a cautious approach<br />

to economic reform, hoping to use gas and cotton sales to sustain its inefficient economy.<br />

Privatization goals remain limited. In 1998-2005, Turkmenistan suffered from the<br />

continued lack of adequate export routes for natural gas and from obligations on<br />

extensive short-term external debt. At the same time, however, total exports rose by 20%<br />

to 30% per year in 2003-2005, largely because of higher international oil and gas prices.<br />

In 2005, Ashgabat sought to raise natural gas export prices to its main customers, Russia<br />

and Ukraine, from $44 per thousand cubic meters (tcm) to $66 per tcm. Overall prospects<br />

in the near future are discouraging because of widespread internal poverty, the burden of<br />

foreign debt, the government's irrational use of oil and gas revenues, and its unwillingness<br />

to adopt market-oriented reforms. Turkmenistan's economic statistics are state secrets,<br />

and GDP and other figures are subject to wide margins of error. In particular, the rate of<br />

GDP growth is uncertain.


140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Georgia 102,6 111,2 110,5 103,1 102,9 101,8 104,8 105,5 111,1 105,9 109,3 108,6<br />

Azerbaijan 88,2 101,3 105,8 110 107,4 111,1 109,9 110,6 111,2 110,2 126,4 134,5<br />

Armenia 106,9 105,9 103,3 107,3 103,3 105,9 109,6 113,2 114 110,5 114 113,4<br />

Kazahstan 91,8 100,5 101,7 98,1 102,7 109,8 113,5 109,8 109,3 109,6 109,5 110,6<br />

Ukraine 102,6 111,2 110,5 103,1 102,9 101,8 104,8 105,5 111,1 105,9 109,3 108,6<br />

<br />

<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Georgia 86 107 108 98 107 111 95 107 115 109 116<br />

Azerbaijan 79 93 100,3 102 104 107 105 104 106 106 134 136,6<br />

Armenia 102 101 101 98 105 106 105 115 115 102 108 99,1<br />

Kazahstan 92 100,3 104 98 103 116 114 111 109 110 105 107<br />

Ukraine 88 95 99,7 99 104 112 114 107 116 113 103 106,2


180<br />

170<br />

160<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Georgia 151 106 152 180 49 97 111 118 191<br />

Azerbaijan 82 212 139 123 98 103 121 184 174 135 117 114,8<br />

Armenia 96 113 100 117 98 127 106 145 141 115 133 137,1<br />

Kazahstan 57 60 112 142 133 149 145 111 117 123 134 110,6<br />

Ukraine 72 78 91 106 100,4 114 121 109 131 128 102 116,1<br />

<br />

<br />

180<br />

170<br />

160<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Georgia 103 94 139 122 107 116 111 113 110 100,2 112 111,3<br />

Azerbaijan 91 100,7 117 120 133 121 117 109 112 107 111 107,2<br />

Armenia 99,7 92 94 87 91 90 114 169 92 93 123 119,1<br />

Kazahstan 73 104 105 98 101 145 113 113 109 109 104 105,4<br />

Ukraine 80 75 96 92 92 100 103 104 116 105 98 109,5


190<br />

180<br />

170<br />

160<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Georgia 81 136 107 78 100,1 121 112 116 136 143 125 97<br />

Azerbaijan 104 102 130 61 91 111 95 109 136 185 147 102,7<br />

Armenia 107 76 74 85 70 130 121 108 134 97 150 113,2<br />

Kazahstan 154 110 94 71 72 155 113 83 136 137 99,3 137,1<br />

Ukraine 124 106 75 75 77 138 104 94 138 142 126 118<br />

<br />

<br />

220<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Georgia 147 123 145 83 154 148 89 102 133 135 144 130,5<br />

Azerbaijan 93 97 118 93 192 210 139 92 117 133 115 158,1<br />

Armenia 176 160 85 102 125 130 111 162 136 107 131 100,7<br />

Kazahstan 174 115 129 92 135 148 93 125 133 161 149 137,4<br />

Ukraine 133 113 124 98 99 121 115 117 125 142 98 109,4


Year Quarter<br />

Georgia -<br />

total<br />

City of<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Abkhazia<br />

AR<br />

Adjara AR Guria<br />

region<br />

Imereti<br />

region<br />

Kakheti<br />

region<br />

of which:<br />

Mtskheta-<br />

Mtianeti<br />

region<br />

Racha-<br />

Lechkhumi<br />

region<br />

Samegrelo-<br />

Zemo<br />

Svaneti<br />

region<br />

Samtskhe-<br />

Javaketi<br />

region<br />

Turnover in enterprises sphere by regions<br />

mln. GEL <br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br />

3975.2 2133.5 418.6 32.4 360.1 117.2 61.3 17.1 189.8 59.2 364.7 95.8<br />

4595.6 2739.7 396.7 26.5 330.3 89.0 58.2 14.2 184.3 71.3 335.8 140.3<br />

5523.0 3330.0 423.4 27.9 380.9 101.3 80.8 14.4 243.4 84.2 420.7 209.7<br />

7248.4 4455.7 383.1 35.4 406.7 123.1 114.2 14.6 339.7 98.0 522.2 195.1<br />

8464.3 5147.6 513.0 48.1 493.8 160.7 114.1 21.4 425.8 134.9 606.0 269.0<br />

2342.7 1647.1 114.8 9.4 108.8 38.7 29.0 3.5 90.0 35.3 188.0 64.6<br />

Share <br />

100.0 53.7 10.5 0.8 9.1 2.9 1.5 0.4 4.8 1.5 9.2 2.4<br />

100.0 59.6 8.6 0.6 7.2 1.9 1.3 0.3 4.0 1.6 7.3 3.1<br />

100.0 60.3 7.7 0.5 6.9 1.8 1.5 0.3 4.4 1.5 7.6 3.8<br />

100.0 61.5 5.3 0.5 5.6 1.7 1.6 0.2 4.7 1.4 7.2 2.7<br />

100.0 60.8 6.1 0.6 5.8 1.9 1.3 0.3 5.0 1.6 7.2 3.2<br />

100.0 70.3 4.9 0.4 4.6 1.7 1.2 0.1 3.8 1.5 8.0 2.8<br />

<br />

Kvemo<br />

Kartli<br />

region<br />

Shida<br />

Kartli<br />

region


Turnover in mnl GEL<br />

8 000<br />

7 000<br />

6 000<br />

5 000<br />

4 000<br />

3 000<br />

Turnover in enterprices by regions 2001-2006<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Georgia<br />

Adjara<br />

Guria<br />

Imereti<br />

Kakheti<br />

MchetaMtianeti<br />

RachaLechkhumi<br />

SamegreloSvaneti<br />

SamtskheJavaheti<br />

KvemoKartli<br />

ShidaKartli<br />

2 000<br />

1 000<br />

0<br />

<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

YEARS<br />

<br />

<br />

mln GEL Minimum Maximum<br />

Mean<br />

in years 2001 - 2006<br />

RachaLechkhumi 3.50 21.40 14.20<br />

Guria 9.40 48.10 29.95<br />

MchetaMtianeti 29.00 114.20 76.26<br />

SamtskheJavaheti 35.30 134.90 80.48<br />

Kakheti 38.70 160.70 105.00<br />

ShidaKartli 64.60 269.00 162.41<br />

SamegreloSvaneti 90.00 425.80 245.50<br />

Imereti 108.80 493.80 346.76<br />

Adjara 114.80 513.00 374.93<br />

KvemoKartli 188.00 606.00 406.23<br />

Tbilisi 1647.10 5147.60 3242.26<br />

Georgia 2342.70 8464.30 5358.20


100%<br />

Turnover in in enterprises sphere by regions in 2005<br />

8 000<br />

7 000<br />

80%<br />

6 000<br />

Percent<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

5 148<br />

5 000<br />

4 000<br />

3 000<br />

Total value in GEL<br />

2 000<br />

20%<br />

1 000<br />

0%<br />

Tbilisi<br />

606 513 494 426 269 161 135 114 48 21<br />

Adjara<br />

KvemoKartli<br />

0<br />

SamegreloSvaneti Kakheti MchetaMtianeti RachaLechkhumi<br />

Imereti ShidaKartli SamtskheJavaheti Guria


Year Quarter<br />

Georgia -<br />

total<br />

City of<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Abkhazia<br />

AR<br />

Adjara AR Guria<br />

region<br />

Imereti<br />

region<br />

Kakheti<br />

region<br />

of which:<br />

Mtskheta-<br />

Mtianeti<br />

region<br />

Racha-<br />

Lechkhumi<br />

region<br />

Samegrelo-<br />

Zemo<br />

Svaneti<br />

region<br />

Samtskhe-<br />

Javaketi<br />

region<br />

Kvemo<br />

Kartli<br />

region<br />

Shida<br />

Kartli<br />

region<br />

Number of employed persons in enterprises sphere by regions<br />

persons <br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br />

313370 140468 28388 5589 44192 13537 5924 2541 21815 6980 26164 13268<br />

301310 143556 25957 4990 38976 11714 5289 2491 18907 6177 23521 11837<br />

297795 141674 25500 4640 39130 11368 5058 2595 17765 6292 23479 12000<br />

322779 148984 24648 4402 33591 10823 5629 2321 18328 5463 23519 9831<br />

310989 138166 25682 4033 33543 10832 5667 2365 18993 5787 24883 10636<br />

297852 164861 22463 3430 32974 10811 4951 1726 17422 5412 22466 10475<br />

Share <br />

100.0 44.8 9.1 1.8 14.1 4.3 1.9 0.8 7.0 2.2 8.3 4.2<br />

100.0 47.6 8.6 1.7 12.9 3.9 1.8 0.8 6.3 2.1 7.8 3.9<br />

100.0 47.6 8.6 1.6 13.1 3.8 1.7 0.9 6.0 2.1 7.9 4.0<br />

100.0 46.2 7.6 1.4 10.4 3.4 1.7 0.7 5.7 1.7 7.3 3.0<br />

100.0 44.4 8.3 1.3 10.8 3.5 1.8 0.8 6.1 1.9 8.0 3.4<br />

100.0 55.4 7.5 1.2 11.1 3.6 1.7 0.6 5.8 1.8 7.5 3.5


Number of employed<br />

350 000<br />

300 000<br />

250 000<br />

200 000<br />

150 000<br />

100 000<br />

Employed in enterprises sphere by<br />

regions 2001-2006<br />

Georgia<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Adjara<br />

Guria<br />

Imereti<br />

Kakheti<br />

MchetaMtianeti<br />

RachaLechkhumi<br />

SamegreloSvaneti<br />

SamtskheJavaheti<br />

KvemoKartli<br />

50 000<br />

0<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

YEARS<br />

<br />

<br />

Ascending rank Minimum Maximum<br />

Mean employment in<br />

years 2001 - 2006<br />

RachaLechkhumi 1726.00 2595.00 2339<br />

Guria 3430.00 5589.00 4514<br />

MchetaMtianeti 4951.00 5924.00 5419<br />

SamtskheJavaheti 5412.00 6980.00 6018<br />

ShidaKartli 9831.00 13268.00 11341<br />

Kakheti 10811.00 13537.00 11514<br />

Samegrelo Svaneti 17422.00 21815.00 18871<br />

KvemoKartli 22466.00 26164.00 24005<br />

Adjara 22463.00 28388.00 25439<br />

Imereti 32974.00 44192.00 37067<br />

Tbilisi 138166.00 164861.00 146284<br />

Georgia 297795.00 322779.00 307349


100%<br />

Employment in enterprises sphere by regions in 2006 1st Q<br />

300 000<br />

Percent of total employment<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

164 861<br />

250 000<br />

200 000<br />

150 000<br />

100 000<br />

50 000<br />

Employment<br />

0%<br />

Tbilisi<br />

32 974<br />

22 466 22 463 17 422 10 811 10 475 5 412 4 951 3 430 1 726<br />

0<br />

KvemoKartli SamegreloSvaneti ShidaKartli MchetaMtianeti RachaLechkhumi<br />

Imereti Adjara<br />

Kakheti SamtskheJavaheti Guria


Year Quarter<br />

Georgia -<br />

total<br />

City of<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Abkhazia<br />

AR<br />

Adjara AR Guria<br />

region<br />

Imereti<br />

region<br />

Kakheti<br />

region<br />

of which:<br />

Mtskheta-<br />

Mtianeti<br />

region<br />

Racha-<br />

Lechkhumi<br />

region<br />

Samegrelo-<br />

Zemo<br />

Svaneti<br />

region<br />

Samtskhe-<br />

Javaketi<br />

region<br />

Average wages and salaries per employed persons in industry by regions<br />

GEL <br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br />

126.2 160.5 59.4 81.5 86.9 91.9 133.5 105.6 60.7 115.5 146.6 69.6<br />

139.4 155.3 77.0 61.6 85.9 123.2 169.8 126.5 72.3 135.6 195.6 106.5<br />

174.3 206.5 103.6 78.9 135.0 114.4 202.7 115.3 74.0 150.1 208.0 123.0<br />

201.4 229.5 130.6 89.8 156.4 163.6 202.7 183.0 80.3 176.8 259.0 138.6<br />

<br />

278.3 330.2 279.3 136.2 172.9 202.9 382.0 262.5 177.6 371.7 317.8 173.0<br />

Average wages and salaries per employed persons in enterprises sphere by regions<br />

108.4 128.6 101.7 57.2 73.1 64.0 100.8 78.2 85.4 73.3 112.0 78.3<br />

119.9 132.4 125.0 57.8 80.4 78.7 117.4 80.6 101.2 77.7 145.1 100.6<br />

139.4 154.8 130.5 71.7 106.6 74.1 139.6 79.2 122.7 84.9 159.3 119.1<br />

161.6 184.9 136.7 74.9 100.4 97.7 139.6 106.5 150.5 117.4 183.8 91.4<br />

<br />

270.0 306.5 349.7 90.5 148.2 137.6 279.8 173.9 290.7 209.4 242.6 136.4<br />

<br />

Kvemo<br />

Kartli<br />

region<br />

Shida<br />

Kartli<br />

region


Ascending rank Minimum Maximum<br />

Mean wages in years<br />

2001-2004<br />

Guria 57.20 90.50 70.4200<br />

Kakheti 64.00 137.60 90.4200<br />

ShidaKartli 78.30 119.10 97.3500<br />

Imereti 73.10 148.20 101.7400<br />

RachaLechkhumi 78.20 173.90 103.6800<br />

SamskoJavaheti 73.30 209.40 112.5400<br />

SamegreloSvaneti 85.40 290.70 150.1000<br />

MchetaMt 100.80 279.80 155.4400<br />

Georgia 108.40 270.00 159.8600<br />

KwemoKartli 112.00 242.60 168.5600<br />

Adjara 101.70 349.70 168.7200<br />

Tbilisi 128.60 306.50 181.4400<br />

<br />

<br />

Employment in enterprises - Georgia<br />

325000<br />

320000<br />

315000<br />

310000<br />

305000<br />

300000<br />

Employment vs. wages in Georgia<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2006<br />

295000<br />

100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300<br />

Avarage wages in Georgia in GEL


Employment in enterprices - Tbilisi<br />

165000<br />

160000<br />

155000<br />

150000<br />

145000<br />

Employment vs. wages in Tbilisi<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2006<br />

140000<br />

125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325<br />

Avarage wages in Tbilisi in GEL<br />

<br />

Tbilisi<br />

(VA)<br />

Georgia<br />

(GDP)<br />

In mln GEL 1996 2000 2005 2000 2005<br />

Agriculture 0.2 9.1 8.2 1 245.0 1 717.7<br />

Mining 40.9 85.3<br />

Manufacturing 157.2* 262.5 535.3 516.7 991.1<br />

Supply of Electricity, Natural Gas and Water 263.3 325.9<br />

Production by Households 28.5 19.7 223.3 406.8<br />

Constructions 41.1 120.0 276.7 224.7 1 015.3<br />

Trade 323.3 275.2 422.1 762.3 1 315.7<br />

Hotels and Restaurants 141.1 328.2<br />

Transport 52.0 226.9 417.4 707.8 990.8<br />

Post and Telecommunication 151.0 471.7<br />

Financial Intermediation 15.8 88.3 230.9<br />

Real Estate 26.3 110.4 334.7<br />

Public Administration 3.5 84.9 263.3 202.8 750.5<br />

Education 13.5 65.8 127.6 213.7 382.0<br />

Health and Social Work 15.0 123.6 157.5 314.2 389.4<br />

Other Community, Social and Personal Cervices 15.3 196.7 363.6<br />

Hired Employment in Households 15.3 9.4<br />

Indirect Assessment of the Use of Financial Brokerage<br />

in Business Activity<br />

-55.4 -129.7


in mln GEL 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Agriculture, forestry, fishery 15.4 8.1 9.1 6.8 2.6 4.8 27.7 8.2<br />

Processing by domestic agriculture 33.2 33.9 28.5 36.8 42.8 45.9 51.3 19.7<br />

Industry 173.3 219.0 262.5 273.1 313.1 363.2 373.3 535.3<br />

Constructions 108.9 79.5 120.0 108.0 150.6 202.0 247.7 276.7<br />

Trade and technical service 166.4 201.8 275.2 291.7 351.2 380.5 401.1 422.1<br />

Transport, store industry and 211.7 258.7 226.9 248.5 266.5 326.6 350.4 417.4<br />

communication<br />

State government, self defense 82.9 77.3 84.9 96.8 117.2 126.3 196.3 263.3<br />

Education 41.6 54.8 65.8 75.0 81.2 92.9 121.3 127.6<br />

Health care 88.8 94.4 123.6 121.9 142.3 115.9 104.4 157.5<br />

Other kinds of services 398.4 451.2 419.7 426.9 613.4 612.0 532.6 772.4<br />

The whole additional cost 1320.5 1478.8 1616.2 1685.5 2080.9 2270.2 2406.1 3000.2<br />

<br />

Key conclusions for the Tbilisi benchmarking part:<br />

1. The economy of Tbilisi is of key importance for the national economy. Since<br />

2003 it generates over 60% of the turnover in enterprise sphere in relation to<br />

other regions of the country. In this aspect Tbilisi is the national leader.<br />

2. Every year the employment in Tbilisi economy exceeds 40% of the total<br />

number of jobs in the enterprise sphere in all regions of Georgia.<br />

3. The level of salaries is significantly higher than in other regions both in the<br />

enterprise sphere and in the manufacturing sector. It is even three times higher<br />

than in the region where salaries are lowest (Seida Karli).<br />

4. Since the late 1990s the industrial production sector has been manufacturing<br />

less and less advanced technology products, i.e. the ones of the highest added<br />

value impact (electric engines, trucks, elements for air industry).<br />

5. Recent introduction into official statistics of the data concerning the growing<br />

number of computers, particularly notebook computers, is the element which<br />

may point out a new direction in the development of local economy.


The improvement of environment that businesses work in is one of the priorities of the<br />

Georgian government. In spite of the fact that many issues should be solved in the<br />

near future it has to be said that many steps have been taken to stimulate economic<br />

activities of Georgian citizens in recent years. The World Bank’s and the International<br />

Finance Corporation’s (IFC) Doing Business report can be reviewed to assess current<br />

situation and take actions in this field. The World Bank has assessed the conditions<br />

and environment which the businesses, especially small and medium ones, have to<br />

face in different countries. The database called “Doing Business” presents indicators<br />

of business regulations and their enforcement. The Doing Business collects data and<br />

provides comparable indicators across 175 worlds economies. It analyses the<br />

regulatory costs of business and can be used to analyze specific regulations that<br />

enhance or constrain investment, productivity, and growth. The Doing Business<br />

project covers ten topics of business environment:<br />

• starting a business<br />

• dealing with licensing<br />

• employing workers<br />

• registering property<br />

• getting credit<br />

• protecting investors<br />

• paying taxes<br />

• trading across borders<br />

• enforcing contracts<br />

• closing business.<br />

“Georgia was the top reformer in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)<br />

and was the leader in the global top 10 reformers’ rankings as far as the ease of doing<br />

business in 2005–2006 is concerned, according to the report.<br />

Georgia made enormous improvements to many areas of its business regulations and<br />

jumped over an astonishing 75 places in the rankings in just one year, moving from<br />

112th place to number 37, Georgia’s annual leap in the rankings was the furthest<br />

since the Doing Business report was launched four years ago. It just shows how far a<br />

country can go if it is committed to reforms. Georgia improved its business startup<br />

procedures, dramatically improved its customs procedures, introduced specialized<br />

courts, streamlined labor regulations, introduced a credit bureau, and enormously cut<br />

the number of licenses. The country has seen a 55 percent increase in the number of<br />

new businesses being registered. In addition, the unemployment rate fell by 2<br />

percent.” says Caralee McLiesh, a co-founder of the Doing Business project.<br />

1 Chapter based on The World Bank’s and the International Finance Corporation’s (IFC) Doing Business report.


In addition to being the leading global reformer, Georgia was the leading reformer in<br />

three of the specific areas studied by the report:<br />

(1) Dealing with licenses: The report looks specifically at construction licenses and<br />

permits, and this year Georgia created a one-stop shop for building permits. Shorter<br />

time limits for the issuance of permits were introduced, and several unnecessary<br />

procedures were eliminated.<br />

(2) Enforcing contracts: Georgia established specialized commercial sections in the<br />

courts. Also, the supreme court can now decide which cases to review. Previously, it<br />

dealt with every case sent by the lower courts. In addition, Georgia has been striving<br />

to reduce corruption in the courts by increasing judges’ salaries and more<br />

aggressively investigating corruption and taking disciplinary measures against judges.<br />

(3) Employing workers: The new labor code eases restrictions on the duration of<br />

term contracts and overtime work. The new law provides for one month’s severance<br />

pay, replacing complex rules requiring varying notice periods and the involvement of<br />

labor unions and the Ministry of Labor. Georgia also reduced the social security<br />

contributions paid on wages by businesses from 31% to 20%. Together, these<br />

changes make Georgia the sixth easiest place to employ workers globally (after the<br />

Marshall Islands, United States, Singapore, Tonga, and the Maldives). In addition,<br />

Georgia made strides in increasing the ease of starting business. Georgia reduced the<br />

minimum capital required to start a new business from 2,000 lari to 200 (US$85). As a<br />

result, business registrations rose by 55 percent from 2006 to 2006, reflecting both the<br />

creation of new businesses and the registration of companies formerly operating in the<br />

shadow economy. In the area of getting credit, Georgia also has made some<br />

legislative changes to facilitate the exchange of credit information, and a private credit<br />

bureau began to support the exchange of information among banks.<br />

While Georgia is the leading reformer this year, there are still several areas where<br />

there is considerable room for improvement. In the ease of paying taxes, for example,<br />

Georgia ranks only 104 globally. Although tax reform in previous years has simplified<br />

taxes and decreased rates, a company still spends about 53 days per year to pay<br />

taxes. Georgia also is relatively poorly ranked in closing a business (ranked at 86),<br />

suggesting a need for bankruptcy reform. Another priority area is trading across<br />

borders, where Georgia ranks at 95, due to a relatively high cost to import and export<br />

and a large number of required procedures.<br />

Finally, Georgia ranks only 135 on protecting investors, lower than most of its CIS<br />

colleagues. The International Finance Corporation is engaged on the ground in<br />

supporting Georgia’s reform efforts. With support from BP and the Government of<br />

Canada, it provides technical assistance in the area of SME policy work. The IFC<br />

SME Policy Project tightly cooperates with the Georgian government to further<br />

improve two regulatory issues: inspections and permits/licenses. The project is<br />

working on streamlining licensing and inspecting procedures according to international<br />

best practices. It also conducts regular surveys of entrepreneurs, providing first-hand<br />

information on administrative barriers hindering business growth. The IFC SME survey<br />

reports provide clear recommendations for improvement to the government. The<br />

survey instrument is also used to measure the effect of administrative reforms on<br />

businesses against a baseline established by IFC’s first Georgia survey, conducted in<br />

2004. Recently, the project has finalized its second survey, polling 1880 SMEs in 11<br />

regions throughout Georgia. The survey covers 4 key issues for SME sector<br />

development: licenses and permits, inspection system, tax administration and exportimport<br />

procedures, the World Bank noted in Doing Business 2007: ”Georgia makes<br />

an unprecedented jump up the global rankings” http://web.worldbank.org/


Tbilisi development in the beginning of the 20th century is characterized by an<br />

increasing population and high construction activity. In the middle of 1950s the<br />

massive construction of housing settlements and following branches of industry<br />

began: machinery construction (including military sector), electronics and<br />

microelectronics, light industry, construction, food processing, timber reprocessing,<br />

pharmaceutical and perfume industry, based on the imported raw materials,<br />

technologies and norms. It had a guaranteed market to sell those products.<br />

After the collapse of Soviet Union Tbilisi industry practically stopped existing. Since<br />

2004 the capital city has been undergong revitalization process of its economy base,<br />

looking for a new development factors. At the time of dissolution of the USRR in 1991<br />

Georgia inherited a rather diversified sector of industry – a wide range of industrial<br />

enterprises, from food and timber processing, production of fertilizers, and coal and<br />

magnesium ore mining, to steel and non ferrous metallurgy. Many of these industries<br />

have been, and still remain, unique natural monopolies in the broader region. The<br />

dissolution of the USSR was accompanied by the fracturing of supply lines and the<br />

elimination of the soviet –time guaranteed state contracts. Georgian industry declined<br />

dramatically.<br />

The recovery and growth of industry resulted from political and economic stabilization.<br />

A great number of industrial enterprises were privatized or transformed into joint-stock<br />

companies. The restructuring of oversized Soviet-style mega enterprises facilitated the<br />

creation of economically efficient competitive industries as well as the development of<br />

small and medium size businesses in the sector.


STRENGTHS<br />

• State and economy reforms after “Rose<br />

revolution”<br />

• Increase in population<br />

• Development of cooperation with foreign<br />

partners and international institutions<br />

• Growing number of visitors<br />

• Improving technical infrastructure<br />

• Beauty of city architecture and city cultural<br />

heritage and unique city center<br />

• Growing public budget revenues and public<br />

investment<br />

• Growing wages and community incomes<br />

• Improved access to funding for citizens and<br />

companies<br />

• Improving municipal services and growing<br />

quality of life<br />

• Increased number of companies<br />

• Increase of foreign investments<br />

• Rapid growth of service and construction<br />

sector<br />

• Growing number of university students<br />

• Large share of people with university<br />

education in the city’s population<br />

• Existing land for production/services<br />

investments and housing<br />

WEAKNESSES<br />

• Decrease of young population<br />

• Poor recognition of the city abroad<br />

• Insufficient funds for quick development tasks<br />

completion<br />

• De-capitalisation of large part of housing and<br />

infrastructure resources; large share of low quality<br />

public space<br />

• Depreciated large post-industrial areas<br />

• Collapse of traditional economy and closing of<br />

many factories that were functioning in the city<br />

before what resulted with huge reductions of work<br />

places<br />

• City economic base still is largely traditional with<br />

limited growth potential<br />

• Workforce without qualifications in new sectors of<br />

city economy<br />

• Low innovation level of local economy – generally<br />

low earning and low asset base type economy<br />

• Insufficient network of roads and bridges<br />

• Small demand for new workers<br />

• Low quality of workforce development services and<br />

programs<br />

• High crime rate and the sense of insecurity among<br />

residents and visitors<br />

• Decrease in work places and growing<br />

unemployment rate<br />

• Large share of educated people among the<br />

unemployed<br />

• Export of raw materials and low processed goods<br />

• Negative balance in foreign exchange<br />

• Significant number of people living in poverty<br />

• Pay gap between men and women<br />

• Lack of highly processed “flag products” to be<br />

exported by the City<br />

• Overstaffed education<br />

• Insufficient level of domestic capital investments<br />

• Poor competitiveness of local business on<br />

international markets<br />

• Significant share of grey area in local economy


OPPORTUNIETIES<br />

• Farther legal changes improving business<br />

environment<br />

• Cooperation with the European Union and other<br />

international organizations<br />

• Access to the international donors funds and<br />

technical assistance<br />

• Positive economic prognoses (growing GDP)<br />

• The chance given to foreign business to invest<br />

various segments of economy, especially in the<br />

advanced technology area<br />

• The farther reform of public finances<br />

• Shrinkage of informal economy<br />

• Development of business institutional<br />

infrastructure (business organizations -<br />

chambers, clusters, associations, access to<br />

funding, access space for business and access<br />

to technical assistance)<br />

• Growing employment in public and market<br />

services<br />

• Transformation of education system following<br />

requirements of labour market<br />

• Opportunities for development of tourism<br />

industry<br />

• Development of Tbilisi metropolitan area<br />

• Improved education level<br />

• Investments in education<br />

• Promotion of local business<br />

• Better access to human resources in metro area<br />

• Improved incoming and outcoming<br />

transportation<br />

• Favourable conditions for the development of<br />

sport, leisure and tourism as well as for<br />

organisation of important events.<br />

• Development of infrastructure in the European<br />

transport corridors, investment in roads, airports,<br />

ports and new railway connections<br />

THREATS<br />

• Slowdown of reforms<br />

• Negative demographic changes<br />

• Emigration of young people and qualified<br />

workers<br />

• Growing number of people without incomes<br />

form work and growing number of families in<br />

poverty.<br />

• Economic barriers disturbing the access to<br />

health, educational and cultural services<br />

• Missing the chances offered by foreign<br />

institutions and donors to improve the quality<br />

of life and to develop the economy<br />

• Growing unemployment of young people<br />

• Low level of education<br />

• Lack of educational services outside traditional<br />

schooling<br />

• Lack of strong research institutions that can<br />

transfer innovation and knowledge to local<br />

companies<br />

• Lack of products that are competitive on<br />

international markets<br />

• Week cooperation and networking between<br />

firms and private and public institutions.<br />

• Deepening deficit in foreign trade<br />

• Growth of inflation and increase of living and<br />

business costs<br />

• Macroeconomic changes and global<br />

competition<br />

• The wave of bankruptcies and closedowns<br />

• Economic growth depending on foreign capital,<br />

know-how and technology.


Good outcomes reflecting the satisfying condition of Tbilisi economy, when compared<br />

to the rest of the country, results from the fact that the city does not face any<br />

competition as far as economic indices are concerned. Other regions perform much<br />

worse than the City of Tbilisi.<br />

The authors of new programmes of economic development have to consider the fact<br />

that their impact will not be restricted only to the metropolitan area of Tbilisi, but that<br />

they will strongly influence the national economy. The increase of economic indicators<br />

is built mainly on the growing production of low processed goods (e.g. cement, sawn<br />

wood) and on the export of raw materials (such as ores), which will not contribute to<br />

the economic growth and increased competitiveness on foreign markets. Also, these<br />

segments will not attract technology transfer and will not generate new, competitive<br />

products.<br />

As a result of economy transformation Tbilisi lost its traditional industries that were<br />

generating incomes and workplaces for decades. Schools, universities and supporting<br />

institutions were organized around them. Now, when most of old factories do not<br />

operate any more all these institutions should transform their activities or will be closed<br />

down too.<br />

To create Tbilisi new economy profile and face competition of global markets new city<br />

products should be identified and new institutional infrastructure should be developed<br />

to support key city development possibilities. Cluster networks should grow around<br />

competitive city products that will be identified. Workforce development programs<br />

should be created to support young people entering labour market and those who<br />

need to change or improve their qualifications. Schools and vocational training<br />

institutions should develop new educational programs to prepare qualified workforce<br />

for the new sectors of economy. To build foundations for knowledge-based economy<br />

the research institutions should offer companies new management and production<br />

technologies. The whole range of institutions is needed to offer funding to growing<br />

companies (credit, capital and guarantees). Business networks, organizations,<br />

consulting and marketing companies will help companies and their products enter<br />

new markets and compete with foreign companies. Public institutions should<br />

participate in the process of supporting promotion campaigns, offering good quality<br />

space and qualified workforce for all new generation of firms and institution, in order<br />

to build international reputation and recognition of the city.


USD thds<br />

the name of the group 2000 2005<br />

all 322 821.1 865 892.4<br />

livestock 8.1 15.6<br />

meat and meat products 303.2 533.0<br />

fish and crustacea molluscs and other invertebrates 135.5 992.3<br />

sea products, bird eggs, natural honey 42.8 2 625.5<br />

products of animal origin, not settled on the other place - 0.4<br />

alive plants, cut flowers and decorative grass 216.3 873.6<br />

vegetables and roots and bulbs good for feed 560.3 1 053.6<br />

fruit and nut good for feed, crust and skin of citrus 22 255.0 76 937.3<br />

coffee, tea and condiments 7 269.8 5 199.5<br />

bread cereals 1 184.4 6 152.6<br />

flour production, starch, wheat 1 900.6 1 926.9<br />

seed and fruit of plants, plants for medical and technical purposes 1 193.5 2 579.0<br />

pitches and other vegetable juices and extracts 5.0 215.9<br />

other products from plant origin, not settled on the other place 4.4 42.1<br />

fats and oils and the products of their processing, prepared food, fats<br />

and albumens 32.3 203.0<br />

prepared food with meat, fish or roots or with sea invertebrates 67.3 41.3<br />

sugar and confectionery products from sugar 2 844.1 30 571.4<br />

cocoa and products with it 12.3 1 094.5<br />

prepared food with grain, flour starch or milk, flour confectionery<br />

products 161.7 84.4<br />

vegetables fruit, nuts or plants processing products 1 117.0 5 445.4<br />

various products of feed 381.8 829.9<br />

alcoholic and not alcoholic drinks and vinegar 46 857.2 164 356.7<br />

remains of feed industry, prepared food for animals 4.6 782.8<br />

tobacco and industrial substitutes of tobacco 6 119.3 1 345.8<br />

salt, sulfur, ground and stone, plaster stuff, limestone and cement 1 371.6 18 461.5<br />

ores slag and ashes 29 767.1 38 386.9<br />

mineral fuel, oil and oil products 26 267.1 27 952.6<br />

norganic products of chemistry, admixture of metal radio-active<br />

elements 5 686.4 7 358.9<br />

substances of organic chemistry 100.4 367.6<br />

pharmaceutical products 5 226.9 4 009.0<br />

fertilizers 16 191.5 35 838.6<br />

paint extracts and substances, spots, inks 757.9 1 050.9<br />

etheroils, perfume cosmetics and toilet means 1 099.8 8 295.3<br />

soup, washing and cleaning means, waxes, candles 53.3 966.3


albumonous substances, modified drinks, glues 3.6 0.1<br />

explosive substances, matches - 58.5<br />

photo and cinema 4.9 52.6<br />

other chemistry products 3 048.7 509.9<br />

plastics and their products 1 334.5 472.5<br />

cauthchouc, rubber and their products 95.0 178.5<br />

uncultivated leather and leather materials (except natural fur) and<br />

leather 2 216.3 1 510.5<br />

leather products and harness 104.6 168.0<br />

natural and artificial fur and their products - -<br />

wood and its products, tree coal 7 491.7 16 262.5<br />

cork and its products 0.0 43.5<br />

straw and other wittling products, baskets and wittling products 0.0 0.7<br />

wood or other fibrous cellulose products 3.6 -<br />

paper and cardboard, products of paper mass, paper or cardboard 611.2 625.4<br />

printed books, newspapers and other polygraphic industry 38.1 263.3<br />

silk 105.9 7.0<br />

wool, thin and rough fur of animals, cloth of horse-hair 5.8 62.3<br />

cotton 11.7 -<br />

chemical threads 1.0 1.9<br />

chemical fibres 36.8 124.6<br />

cotton, thick felt and not knitting clothes, special thread, ropes and<br />

cables 44.6 11.7<br />

carpets and other loom floor cover 16.0 5.9<br />

special clothes, laces, tapestries 9.0 4.1<br />

loom materials, saturated, duplicated, technical loom products 0.8 3.3<br />

stockinet linen hand or machine woven - 0.2<br />

stockinet clothes and cloth parts hand or machine woven 96.1 298.6<br />

loom clothes and cloth parts 915.3 8 265.0<br />

other prepared loom products, used cloths and loom products 164.6 219.6<br />

shoes, gaiters and analogical products, their parts 1 523.3 131.0<br />

karchives and their parts 7.0 2.5<br />

umbrellas, crutches, whips for horse riding 1.0 11.2<br />

manufactured feathering and its products, artificial flowers - 0.2<br />

stone, plaster, cement, mica or the production of analogical kind 46.2 263.1<br />

ceramic products 44.8 388.1<br />

glass and its products 1 409.3 452.5<br />

pearl, stones, precious metals and their products 1 576.3 39 413.6<br />

black metals 53 449.9 167 709.8<br />

black metals and their products 3 037.3 4 080.5<br />

copper and its products 4 348.4 11 624.4<br />

nickel and its products 20.1 -<br />

aluminum and its products 17 594.8 11 842.1<br />

mixed doods 78.3 -<br />

bullet and its products 84.1 538.2<br />

zinc and its products 74.6 86.5<br />

other non-precious metals, metal-ceramic and its products 514.7 146.6<br />

instruments, their parts from non-precious metals 1 917.9 163.4<br />

other products from non-precious metals 10.9 245.7


atomic reactors, installations and mechanic products, their parts 18 683.2 29 702.7<br />

electric machines and installations, their parts 4 666.5 5 080.5<br />

locomotives, movable composition and their parts 1 227.3 2 944.9<br />

overground transport means, except railway or tram movable<br />

composition 1 247.3 25 029.8<br />

flying apparatus, cosmic apparatus and their parts 11 230.5 78 197.9<br />

ships and other swimming means 1 618.8 6 106.4<br />

optical, photographical measuring, control, medical instruments and<br />

apparatus 224.3 1 215.0<br />

clocks and their parts 8.3 46.4<br />

musical instruments and their parts 24.8 32.3<br />

weapon and fire arms 1 319.2 149.3<br />

furniture, lighting, building constructions 354.1 4 143.4<br />

toys, games and sporting stock, their parts 107.9 183.2<br />

other prepared products 725.8 187.0<br />

art production, collection things and their antiquary 85.7 33.7<br />

<br />

<br />

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

(In millions of lari)<br />

Nominal GDP at market prices 4.555 5.022 5.669 6.015 6.648 7.457 8.565 9.970<br />

Nominal GDP at factor prices 4.285 4.782 5.342 5.649 6.212 6.961 8.042 9.135<br />

Share in GDP (at factor prices)<br />

(In percent of GDP)<br />

Agriculture, forestry, fishing 29.2 27.6 26.2 21.6 22.1 20.6 20.6 17.8<br />

Mining and quarrying 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9<br />

Manufacturing 10.7 8.9 8.8 9.1 8.3 9.0 9.3 9.8<br />

Electricity, gas and water supply 3.3 3.8 4.7 4.7 4.1 4.5 4.0 3.5<br />

Processing products by household 5.4 5.0 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.4<br />

Constructions 3.8 4.9 4.0 4.0 4.2 5.5 6.8 6.8<br />

Trade services, repair services 11.8 11.0 12.2 13.5 14.0 13.7 14.1 14.4<br />

Restaurant and hotel services 2.1 2.0 2.6 2.5 3.1 3.1 3.8 4.5<br />

Transport and storage 6.7 9.4 10.0 12.5 11.7 12.0 10.9 10.4<br />

Communications 1.5 2.1 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.9<br />

Financial intermediation 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.4<br />

Real estate, renting and business activities 9.7 8.9 7.9 7.5 7.3 6.4 6.4 6.5<br />

Public administration and defense 4.0 4.1 3.7 3.6 3.9 4.2 3.8 6.3<br />

Education 2.9 2.9 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.5 3.8<br />

Health care and social services 3.7 4.7 4.5 5.6 5.2 5.0 4.3 3.7<br />

Other community, social and personal 3.7 3.6 3.2 3.5 3.1 2.8 3.1 3.7<br />

service activities<br />

Private households with employed persons 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />

Nominal GDP at basic prices 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0


.<br />

<br />

(In thousand of tons, unless<br />

otherwise indicated)<br />

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Fuel and energy<br />

Electric power<br />

7.2 8.1 8.1 7.5 6.9 7.3 7.2 6.9<br />

(in billions of kWh)<br />

Coal 4.6 14.7 12.0 7.3 5.0 6.0 8.0 8.0<br />

Oil 133.8 119.2 91.3 109.5 98.8 73.9 139.7 97.6<br />

Natural gas<br />

79.5 40.2 16.7 17.8 10.9<br />

(in millions of m3)<br />

Gasoline 4.4 ... 3.6 1.8 ... ... 0.1 3.3<br />

Diesel fuel 8.1 13.8 22.3 8.8 2.0 0.9 3.7 14.7<br />

Fuel oil („Mazut“) 12.4 15.9 23.2 16.0 8.6 13.6 12.8 16.2<br />

Metallurgy<br />

Cast- iron 1.1 0.1 ... 0.0<br />

Steel 103.2 56.4 7.0 0.1<br />

Finished roll steel ferrous metal 86.7 42.7 7.2 1.4<br />

Steel pipes 23.5 8.5 0.1 0.2<br />

Manganese ore 14.2 16.0 54.9 63.1 98.4 130.4 173.5 218.7<br />

Electro- ferro manganese 0.0 3.4 4.9 0.6 0.1 ... ... ...<br />

Machine- building<br />

Subversive electric motors (in 329.0 74.0 63.0 559.0 402.0 44.0 217.0 25.0<br />

units)<br />

A/C motors (in thousands of kW) 0.1 ... ... ... ... ... ... ...<br />

Electric welding equipment 0.0 0.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...<br />

(in thousands of units)<br />

Metal- cutting machines<br />

28.0 21.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 9.0 30.0 4.0<br />

(in units)<br />

Main- line locomotives<br />

... ... ... 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0<br />

(in units)<br />

Trucks (in thousands of units) 82.0 39.0 38.0 44.0 4.0 ... ... ...<br />

Chemical/ timber products<br />

Mineral fertilizers 80.9 55.4 95.1 100.2 39.2 83.2 89.9 98.8<br />

Chemical fibers and threads 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 ... ... ...<br />

Synthetic ammoniac 102.1 77.5 126.6 136.2 57.9 111.3 124.4 131.2<br />

Synthetic detergents<br />

46.8 10.9 ... ... ... ... ... ...<br />

(in tons)<br />

Sawn wood<br />

(in thousands of m3)<br />

16.7 33.0 34.3 42.8 43.5 51.7 71.1 69.4<br />

Construction<br />

Cement 94.1 198.6 341.4 347.7 335.2 346.8 344.8 424.6<br />

Prefabricated ferro- concrete 8.8 8.7 9.3 13.4 4.6 3.7 4.4 3.9<br />

structures<br />

(in thousands of m3)<br />

Masonry concrete and silicate 16.6 16.5 12.4 11.3 8.3 8.4 12.1 24.9<br />

blocks<br />

(in millions of units)<br />

Natural stone decorative tiles<br />

(in thousands of m3)<br />

... 14.6 10.4 12.4 14.7 11.2 13.9 22.4


General merchandise and<br />

household appliances<br />

Porcelain and faience dishware 191.6 274.2 320.5 185.9 91.8 53.8 ... ...<br />

(in thousands of units)<br />

Color TV (in units) 2037.0 1039.0 1310.0 1585.0 1170.0 11.0 ... ...<br />

Notebooks<br />

953.4 316.0 370.0 194.0 213.0 262.0 1394.0 2035.0<br />

(in thousands of units)<br />

Light industry<br />

Silk thread (in tons) 8.6 ... ... ... ... ... ... ...<br />

Cotton yarn (in tons) 167.0 62.1 6.7 ... ... ... ... ...<br />

Wool yarn (in tons) 61.4 58.7 40.0 5.0 5.0 8.0 11 1<br />

Hosiery (thousands of pairs) 57.0 11.6 0.5 0.5 15.5 16.4 13.5 11.9<br />

Knitwear<br />

76.0 59.0 14.3 10.3 2.6 2.3 0.9 ...<br />

(thousands of pairs)<br />

Footwear<br />

100.9 95.4 101.3 89.8 44.7 24.5 19.4 36.8<br />

(thousands of pairs)<br />

Basic foodstuff and foodprocessing<br />

Bread and bakery products 198.7 172.5 113.6 111.3 88.1 91.6 77.0 100.4<br />

Granulated sugar 19.7 ... 20.0 35.3 ... 47.9 91.8 86.9<br />

Meat products 963.3 1330.0 1429.0 1053.0 415.2 573.3 885.5 1589.0<br />

Meat (tons) 45.3 178.0 6.0 66.0 1.2 0.3 0.5 1.4<br />

Sausage (tons) 918.0 1152.0 1423.0 987.0 414.0 573.0 885.0 1575.0<br />

Butter (tons) 888.0 265.0 1490.0 813.0 519.0 203.0 284.0 666.0<br />

Dairy products<br />

5.4 6.6 4.6 4.2 4.8 5.5 ... ...<br />

(in terms of milk)<br />

Fat cheese (tons) 142.0 47.0 93.0 63.0 28.0 32.0 57.0 61.0<br />

Vegetable (tons) 847.0 542.0 476.0 144.0 51.0 76.0 106.0 118.0<br />

Flour 165.0 148.0 114.4 103.5 79.9 78.3 72.5 136.7<br />

Canned fruit and vegetables 9.6 2.9 6.6 11.2 29.1 28.9 28.2 20.3<br />

(mln.cans)<br />

Confectionery (tons) 235.0 277.0 154.0 144.0 101.0 112.0 336.0 498.0<br />

Packed natural tea 7.8 4.9 4.5 3.0 3.8 3.1 4.1 4.3<br />

Macaroni products (tons) 357.0 860.0 470.0 270.0 293.0 505.0 542.0 738.0<br />

Non- alcoholic beverages 4.0 2.9 2.2 2.9 3.5 3.8 6.8 8.9<br />

(in millions of decaliteres)<br />

Mineral water<br />

66.5 61.3 49.7 72.3 79.7 119.2 138.1 163.6<br />

(in milions of ½ liters)<br />

Cigarettes (in billions) 0.9 0.6 1.3 0.3 1.6 1.8 3.0 2.8<br />

Vodka and liqueurs<br />

251.0 112.7 463.8 439.4 529.0 135.9 117.7 437.7<br />

(in thousands of decaliters)<br />

Grape wine<br />

3.1 2.3 1.9 1.7 2.0 1.9 2.3 2.7<br />

(in millions of decaliters)<br />

Sparkling wine<br />

75.6 40.3 66.9 87.7 115.1 117.7 160.3 177.8<br />

(in thousands of decaliters)<br />

Brandy (in thousands of<br />

82.3 37.8 31.1 71.3 73.0 73.2 141.9 221.9<br />

decaliters)<br />

Beer (in millions of decaliters) 0.8 1.0 1.3 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.8 4.8


of which:<br />

Year<br />

of which: of which: of which:<br />

Collection, purification and<br />

distribution of water<br />

Supply of steam and hot water<br />

Supply of gas<br />

Supply of electricity<br />

Electricity, gas and water supply<br />

Manufac-ture of transport equipment<br />

Manufac-ture of electrical machinery<br />

and optical instruments<br />

manufac-ture of machinery and<br />

equipment<br />

Manufacture of basic metals and<br />

fabricated metal products<br />

Manufac-ture of other non-metalic<br />

mineral products <br />

Manufacture of rubber and plastic<br />

products<br />

Manufac-ture of chemical products<br />

Manufac-ture of oil products<br />

Manufacture of paper and publishing<br />

Manufactu-re of wood and products<br />

wood and cork<br />

Manufac-ture of textiles and textile<br />

goods<br />

Manufac-ture of food products,<br />

beverages and tobacco products<br />

Manufactu-ring<br />

Other mining and quarrying<br />

Mining of metal ores<br />

Mining of crude oil and natural gas<br />

Mining of coal<br />

Mining of eneregy producing<br />

minerals<br />

Mining and Quarrying<br />

Industry - total<br />

Number of employed persons in industry by type of economic activity ( Georgia)<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25<br />

90392 6490 1550 668 882 3752 1188 58738 20330 2895 1842 3998 383 4858 612 4487 7796 1174 2351 5246 25164 16270 2445 49 6400<br />

84502 6464 1453 657 796 3901 1110 54135 18756 2636 2071 3874 87 4588 686 3630 7358 1017 1420 6554 23903 17490 2295 49 6413<br />

82004 6503 1353 527 828 1992 1158 51619 18105 1761 1995 3532 131 4508 644 3688 7181 943 1214 6745 23882 15014 2481 47 6340<br />

85385 7252 1454 525 929 4511 1287 52649 20482 2065 2152 3453 199 4551 903 4012 6271 1087 1079 5117 25484 15985 2909 263 6327<br />

83497 7596 1518 490 1028 4958 1120 52897 20139 2024 2255 3124 78 6774 931 4167 5438 823 1149 4766 23004 17080 3205 52 5924<br />

82598 7318 1076 470 606 5121 1121 51340 21124 2420 1547 3407 22 4380 1554 4324 4886 752 797 4810 23940 14185 3527 69 6159<br />

Share%<br />

100 7,2 1,7 0,8 0,9 4,2 1,3 64,9 22,5 3,2 2,0 4,4 5,3 5,3 0,7 5,0 8,6 1,3 2,6 5,9 27,9 18,0 2,7 0,1 7,1<br />

100 7,7 1,8 0,8 1,0 4,6 1,3 64,0 22,2 3,1 2,5 4,6 5,4 5,4 0,8 4,4 8,8 1,2 1,6 7,7 28,3 17,9 2,7 0,1 7,6<br />

100 7,9 1,6 0,6 1,0 4,9 1,4 62,9 22,1 2,2 2,4 4,3 5,5 5,5 0,7 4,5 8,8 1,1 1,5 8,2 29,2 18,3 3,1 0,1 7,7<br />

100 8,5 1,6 0,6 1,0 5,4 1,5 61,6 24,0 2,2 2,6 4,1 5,4 5,4 1,0 4,7 7,3 1,3 1,3 6,1 29,9 18,7 3,4 0,4 7,4<br />

100 9,1 1,8 0,6 1,2 6,0 1,3 63,4 24,1 2,4 2,8 3,7 0,1 8,1 1,1 5,0 6,6 1,0 1,3 5,7 27,5 16,5 3,8 0,1 7,1<br />

100 8,9 1,3 0,6 0,7 6,2 1,4 62,2 25,6 2,9 1,9 4,1 0,0 5,3 1,9 5,2 5,9 0,9 1,0 5,8 28,9 17,2 4,3 0,1 7,5


of which:<br />

Year<br />

of which: of which: of which:<br />

Collection, purification and<br />

distribution of water<br />

Supply of steam and hot water<br />

Supply of gas<br />

Supply of electricity<br />

Electricity, gas and water supply<br />

Manufac-ture of transport equipment<br />

Manufac-ture of electrical machinery<br />

and optical instruments<br />

manufac-ture of machinery and<br />

equipment<br />

Manufacture of basic metals and<br />

fabricated metal products<br />

Manufac-ture of other non-metalic<br />

mineral products <br />

Manufacture of rubber and plastic<br />

products<br />

Manufac-ture of chemical products<br />

Manufac-ture of oil products<br />

Manufacture of paper and publishing<br />

Manufactu-re of wood and products<br />

wood and cork<br />

Manufac-ture of textiles and textile<br />

goods<br />

Manufac-ture of food products,<br />

beverages and tobacco products<br />

Manufactu-ring<br />

Other mining and quarrying<br />

Mining of metal ores<br />

Mining of crude oil and natural gas<br />

Mining of coal<br />

Mining of eneregy producing<br />

minerals<br />

Mining and Quarrying<br />

Industry - total<br />

Turnover in industry by type of economic activity ( Georgia)<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25<br />

1299 66,0 28,2 0,3 27,9 31,8 6,0 659,3 332,0 5 7,1 26,6 10,1 36,8 14,2 49,2 93,0 5,5 11,4 63,2 574,0 513 29,3 0,1 31,3<br />

1548 77,2 20,9 0,2 20,7 46,8 9,5 846,6 387,0 5 9,5 30,0 5,3 39,8 16,1 54,4 116,1 4,1 7,3 92,4 624,5 533 52,3 0,1 38,3<br />

1862 134,0 43,7 0,3 43,4 71,7 18,6 1042,7 544,7 6 12,3 40,0 16,8 79,8 20,4 80,4 125,9 7,8 9,2 137,3 685,6 575 69,7 0,1 40,8<br />

2119 136,0 38,0 0,7 38,4 85,3 11,6 1243,5 682,4 8 13,3 47,5 32,1 106,0 29,2 100,5 142,4 8,3 12,1 53,1 740,2 598 94,7 0,1 46,9<br />

2308 139,7 19,3 0,7 18,6 108,7 11,9 1438,9 785,5 13 19,6 50,7 1,3 120,3 25,9 119,4 218,2 13,8 14,1 4,6 730,1 591 100 0,1 38,7<br />

675 32,5 10,3 0,1 10,2 19,3 2,9 371,2 201,4 4 3,6 13,8 0,0 32,0 7,8 28,0 65,1 2,8 2,1 7,0 271,4 180 76,1 0,0 14,5<br />

<br />

100 5,1 2,2 0,0 2,2 2,4 0,5 50,7 25,6 0,4 0,5 2,0 0,8 2,8 1,1 3,8 7,2 0,4 0,9 4,9 44,2 39 2,3 0,0 2,4<br />

100 5,0 1,3 0,0 1,3 3,0 0,6 54,7 25,0 0,3 0,6 1,9 0,3 2,6 1,0 3,5 7,5 0,3 0,5 6,0 40,3 34 3,4 0,0 2,4<br />

100 7,2 2,3 0,0 2,3 3,9 1,0 56,0 29,3 0,4 0,7 2,1 0,9 4,3 1,1 4,3 6,8 0,4 0,5 7,4 36,8 30 3,7 0,0 2,2<br />

100 6,4 1,8 0,0 1,8 4,0 0,5 58,7 32,2 0,4 0,9 2,7 1,0 6,0 1,6 5,2 9,2 0,6 0,6 3,3 34,9 26 1,6 0,0 2,1<br />

100 6,1 0,8 0,0 0,8 4,7 0,6 62,3 34,0 6,0 0,9 2,2 0,1 5,2 1,1 5,2 9,5 0,6 0,6 0,2 31,6 25 4,3 0,0 1,7<br />

100 1,8 1,8 4,6 4,0 58,7 32,2 0,4 0,6 2,2 50,0 1,4 0,0 6,7 0,4 0,6 2,5 0,2 34,9 28,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0


<strong>LOCAL</strong><br />

<strong>ECONOMIC</strong><br />

<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />

<strong>PLAN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>TBILISI</strong><br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

CITY COMPETITIVEES<br />

ASSESSMENT<br />

Tbilisi City Hall │ Economic Policy Agency<br />

Address: 2, Liberty Sq │ Tbilisi 0105, Georgia<br />

Tel.:(+99532)932314 │ Fax.:(+99532)932895<br />

E-Mail: economic@tbilisi.gov.ge<br />

www.tbilisi.gov.ge<br />

1


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

City of Tbilisi Competitiveness Assessment ....................................................................................................5<br />

1. Role of cities in regional and national economy ......................................................................................5<br />

1.1. Cities take more important role in national economy.......................................................................5<br />

1.2. Tbilisi in Georgian economy..............................................................................................................7<br />

2. City competitiveness .................................................................................................................................. 18<br />

2.1. Factors of city competitiveness.............................................................................................................. 18<br />

2.2. Assessment of Tbilisi competitiveness.................................................................................................. 20<br />

3. Identification of competitive advantages of Tbilisi economy............................................................. 29<br />

3.1. Identification of city products.................................................................................................................. 29<br />

3.2. Identification of promising Tbilisi clusters .............................................................................................. 31<br />

2


CHARTS<br />

Chart 1-1 Population in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2006....................................................................................................................................8<br />

Chart 1-2 Economic active population in Georgia and Tbilisi ..........................................................................................................................9<br />

Chart 1-3 Employment in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2004...............................................................................................................................11<br />

Chart 1-4 Structure type of activity in Tbilisi in 2004.......................................................................................................................................12<br />

Chart 1-5 Turnover in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2005.....................................................................................................13<br />

Chart 1-6 Turnover in business sector / Employed in 2001 - 2004..................................................................................................................14<br />

Chart 1-7 Earnings in business sector in 2001 – 2005 in Georgia and Tbilisi ............................................................................................15<br />

Chart 1-8 Volume of turnover per employee in business sector....................................................................................................................16<br />

Chart 1-9 Comparative analysis of turnover and employment in business sector ......................................................................................16<br />

Chart 1-10 Comparative analysis of employment and earnings in business sector....................................................................................17<br />

Chart 1-11 Comparative analysis of turnover per employee and earnings in business sector.................................................................17<br />

Chart 2-1 City of Kutaisi SWOT analysis .........................................................................................................................................................22<br />

Chart 2-2 City of Rustavi SWOT analysis........................................................................................................................................................22<br />

Chart 2-3 City of Batumi SWOT analysis.........................................................................................................................................................23<br />

Chart 2-4 City of Tbilisi SWOT analysis............................................................................................................................................................24<br />

Chart 2-5 City of Tbilisi in the region SWOT analysis.........................................................................................................................................27<br />

3


TABLES<br />

Table 1-1 Population in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2006....................................................................................................................................7<br />

Table 1-2 Dynamics in population.........................................................................................................................................................................8<br />

Table 1-3 Economic active population 2001 - 2005...........................................................................................................................................9<br />

Table 1-4 Economic active population / total population 2001 - 2005..............................................................................................................9<br />

Table 1-5 Dynamics in economic active population.........................................................................................................................................10<br />

Table 1-6 Employment in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2004..............................................................................................................................10<br />

Table 1-7 Dynamics in employment in Georgia and Tbilisi...........................................................................................................................11<br />

Table 1-8 Structure of employment In Tbilisi 2004-2005 ...............................................................................................................................12<br />

Table 1-9 Turnover in business sector 2001-2005..............................................................................................................................................13<br />

Table 1-10 Changes of business turnover in Georgia and Tbilisi..................................................................................................................13<br />

Table 1-11 Turnover in business sector / Employed in 2001 - 2004................................................................................................................14<br />

Table 1-12 Earnings in business sector in 2001 - 2005..................................................................................................................................14<br />

Table 1-13 Dynamics in earnings.......................................................................................................................................................................15<br />

Table 2-1 City of Tbilisi in the country, assessment results ..............................................................................................................................21<br />

Table 3-1 City of Tbilisi products evaluation ......................................................................................................................................................30<br />

Table 3-2 Financial cluster assessment of attractiveness...............................................................................................................................32<br />

Table 3-3 Education cluster assessment of attractiveness..............................................................................................................................33<br />

Table 3-4 Real estate cluster assessment of attractiveness..........................................................................................................................34<br />

Table 3-5 Transportation cluster assessment of attractiveness ......................................................................................................................35<br />

Table 3-6 Industry cluster assessment of attractiveness................................................................................................................................36<br />

Table 3-7 Creative cluster assessment of attractiveness.................................................................................................................................37<br />

Table 3-8 Touristic cluster assessment of attractiveness ................................................................................................................................38<br />

4


Report<br />

City of Tbilisi Competitiveness<br />

Assessment<br />

1. Role of cities in regional and national economy<br />

1.1. Cities take more important role in national economy<br />

City are the more and more powerful engines of the national and global economy. Two<br />

key forces - the globalization and the commercialization of new information as well as<br />

communications technologies - have been driving the massive changes and thus<br />

restructuring cities. Globalization is linked to liberalized trade and the opening up of world<br />

markets through organizations and agreements such as the Word Trade Organization or<br />

the European Union. Global corporations continue to expand their role on the world stage<br />

through expansion, mergers and acquisitions.<br />

Globalization would not be possible if there had not been for the explosion of new<br />

information technologies with mobile wireless communication, personal computers, and<br />

networks of internet, intranet and extranet. All of these have made it possible to manage<br />

facilities distributed around the world, for the labour to move more freely across national<br />

boundaries, and for the information, currencies and transactions to flow smoothly to any<br />

destination. As globalization proceeds, regional and national economies become more<br />

closely intertwined. National boundaries have gradually become less relevant as<br />

globalization and information technology have reduced the role of the nation state. Big<br />

metropolises with skilled workforce, globally connected businesses have emerged as the<br />

engines of the new economy.<br />

Globalization, and intensive competition which is integral to it, has led to a massive<br />

restructuring of regional economies. The widespread de-industrialization of cities,<br />

particularly of urban cores, is clear evidence of this. As the global marketplace expands,<br />

each city is forced to focus upon the few things that it is very good at, in which it can<br />

successfully compete at a global scale.<br />

This more recent phase of economic restructuring has been characterized by a<br />

transformation to a knowledge economy. The future quality of life in advanced economies<br />

depends on upgrading and moving the economy towards a concentration in high value<br />

added activities from any industry. The key is to focus on the high order, innovation<br />

based, high productivity activities in each industry. The quality of life and economic<br />

development, depend on making a successful transition to a knowledge economy.<br />

Unlike an economy based on traditional manufacturing and natural resource extraction, in<br />

which factors such as access to raw materials may have played a central role, the<br />

knowledge economy is driven by:<br />

• well educated and high-skilled workforce,<br />

• innovation – creativity, flexibility, research and development,<br />

• entrepreneurship – mentoring, networking, strategic alliances,<br />

• information and communications technology (ICT).<br />

5


The knowledge economy is present in all segments of our society and our economy. It is<br />

not confined to certain groups, such as university graduates, or certain industries, such as<br />

information technology or telecommunications. Rather, the knowledge economy<br />

represents a way of life and a way of producing goods and services that focus on<br />

continuous improvement of the above characteristics. Even “traditional” industries, can<br />

be, or rather should be, a part of the knowledge-based economy. Today successful<br />

companies in older industries employ high quality design and flexible advanced<br />

manufacturing.<br />

Cities have always been areas of growth, the places where economic resources,<br />

entrepreneurship, and a diverse population provided natural opportunity for starting new<br />

economic, cultural and intellectual activities. Cities have always fostered the creativity that<br />

produces technological advancements and new forms of commercial organizations.<br />

There are a lot of good examples in the last century of the power of cities to create new<br />

technological and commercial innovations, as a result of combined activities of<br />

entrepreneurs, artists and technicians congregated in these places. What we are<br />

witnessing now in successful North American and European cities is the concurrence of<br />

cultural and technological creativity that drive the new economy. The multi-media<br />

industries that have exploded in several places are example of this creative convergence.<br />

There is an assortment of specific conditions that exist in cities and which make them a<br />

fertile ground for innovation, creativity, and technological and commercial advancement.<br />

The most important thing that cities can offer is the diverse pool of skilled labour required<br />

to make large-scale and specialized production possible. Secondly, because of their size<br />

cities should offer local markets of sufficient size for specialized goods and services to be<br />

developed. Thirdly, because of their geographical conditions and the enhanced possibility<br />

for formal and informal contacts of all kinds, cities are places where technology and knowhow<br />

can spill over. Information flows easily, and chance encounters can bring together<br />

diverse interests and expertise to create new products and services.<br />

In this context, urban arts and cultural amenities - including not only formal events and<br />

places such as galleries, music halls or museums, but also the vitality of its more informal<br />

amenities like restaurants, street cafés, bookstores and outdoor festivals - becomes<br />

tangible assets that play a role in fostering creativity and innovation.<br />

Cities combine diversity – of population and resources of all kinds. Unique assets show<br />

the innovative capacity and the bunch of possibilities of each city. Under today’s<br />

economic conditions, in the global knowledge economy that is driven by information,<br />

creativity, innovation and technology, when cities are at centre stage, these special urban<br />

characteristic are of the biggest importance.<br />

The elimination, and in some places even the reduction, of national trade barriers has<br />

brought us to the moment when either people or businesses are choosing to locate and<br />

expand in cities that have the mix of economic, social, political and other attributes for<br />

long term success. As a result of urban renaissance we are witnessing the rapid growth of<br />

many North American and European cities. Urban-based industries are the fast-growth<br />

industries, people are moving back to cities and central governments are commencing<br />

massive urban regeneration schemes. It more and more widely recognized that cities are<br />

the focal points of national economies and should follow through with proactive urban<br />

regeneration strategies and investment funding.<br />

6


1.2. Tbilisi in Georgian economy<br />

On its way to becoming a regional center, Tbilisi’s relationships with the rest of the country<br />

should naturally be transformed. The role of cities as major actors on the world economy<br />

stage demands rethinking the whole approach to urban areas and their role in economic<br />

growth and improving quality of life. This rethinking is required not only within cities, but at<br />

the national level. City has not only the value of itself, but can mean even more in context<br />

of the whole region. The realities of a global economy dictate that all levels of government<br />

reevaluate their understanding of the role of cities, and their policies and approaches<br />

towards cities and towns. While each city is developing its own solutions, particular group<br />

of them should benefit from working together to develop and implement an integrated<br />

national, approach to advancing the economies of major urban centers.<br />

Funding and resources must now be directed toward supporting the transition to a<br />

knowledge economy, in the same way that the government supported the resource<br />

sector, and traditional manufacturing industries in the past. Central government<br />

representatives need to take into account the likely impacts of their policy and program<br />

decisions on urban economies. The emerging role of cities has been recognized round<br />

the world and is being exploited as a engines of national economic growth. A wide range<br />

of innovative initiatives and institutions are being put in place to more effectively respond<br />

to the changing context for cities.<br />

Population<br />

Table 1-1 Population in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2006<br />

Population (thds people)<br />

Georgia - total Tbilisi Tbilisi share %<br />

2001 4401.4 1089.7 24.8<br />

2002 4371.5 1081.7 24.7<br />

2003 4342.6 1083.5 25.0<br />

2004 4315.2 1086.4 25.2<br />

2005 4321.5 1092.6 25.3<br />

2006 4401.3 1103.3 25.1<br />

7


Chart 1-1 Population in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2006<br />

5000<br />

Population in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

Georgia population<br />

Tbilisi population<br />

4500<br />

4401,40 4371,50 4342,60<br />

4315,20 4321,50<br />

4401,30<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

Population in thds<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

1089,70 1081,70 1083,50 1086,40 1092,60 1103,30<br />

500<br />

0<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

YEARS<br />

Table 1-2 Dynamics in population<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Dynamics<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2002-2001 99.3 99.3<br />

2003-2002 99.3 100.2<br />

2004-2003 99.4 100.3<br />

2005-2004 100.1 100.6<br />

2006-2005 101.8 101.0<br />

Dynamics 2001-2006<br />

Georgia- total 100.00<br />

Tbilisi 101.25<br />

While the Georgia population is stable Tbilisi slowly grows and now constitutes the one<br />

quarter of the national population.<br />

8


Economic active population<br />

Table 1-3 Economic active population 2001 - 2005<br />

Economic active population (thds people)<br />

Georgia- total Tbilisi Tbilisi share %<br />

2001 2113.3 434.5 20.6<br />

2002 2104.2 448.5 21.3<br />

2003 2050.8 429 20.9<br />

2004 2041 426.9 20.9<br />

2005 2023.9 429.8 21.2<br />

Table 1-4 Economic active population / total population 2001 - 2005<br />

Economic active population / Total population (%)<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2001 48.0 39.9<br />

2002 48.1 41.5<br />

2003 47.2 39.6<br />

2004 47.3 39.3<br />

2005 46.8 39.3<br />

Chart 1-2 Economic active population in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

2500<br />

2250<br />

2000<br />

Economic active population in Georgia and<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2113,30 2104,20<br />

2050,80 2041,00 2023,90<br />

Georgia -economic<br />

active population<br />

Tbilisi-economic<br />

active population<br />

Economic active population<br />

1750<br />

1500<br />

1250<br />

1000<br />

750<br />

500<br />

434,50 448,50 429,00 426,90 429,80<br />

250<br />

0<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

YEARS<br />

9


Table 1-5 Dynamics in economic active population<br />

Dynamics<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2002-2001 99.6 103.2<br />

2003-2002 97.5 95.7<br />

2004-2003 99.5 99.5<br />

2005-2004 99.2 100.7<br />

Changes 2001-2005<br />

Georgia- total 95.8<br />

Tbilisi 98.9<br />

While we can observe the decreasing number of economically active population in<br />

Georgia and Tbilisi during this period, the capital has improved its situation in the last<br />

years and its share in national economically active population has increased. It visible<br />

that the share of economically active population in whole community is still much smaller<br />

in Tbilisi than in the rest of the country.<br />

Employment<br />

Table 1-6 Employment in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2004<br />

Employment ( thds people)<br />

Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />

2001 708.7 323.8 45.7<br />

2002 681.7 319.5 46.9<br />

2003 723.8 317 43.8<br />

2004 722.4 315.8 43.7<br />

10


Chart 1-3 Employment in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2004<br />

Employment in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Table 1-7 Dynamics in employment in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Dynamics<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2002-2001 96.2 98.7<br />

2003-2002 106.2 99.2<br />

2004-2003 99.8 99.6<br />

Dynamics 2001-2004<br />

Georgia- total 101.9<br />

Tbilisi 97.5<br />

11


Chart 1-4 Structure type of activity in Tbilisi in 2004<br />

Structure type of activity in Tbilisi in 2004<br />

6%<br />

2%<br />

1%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

5%<br />

11%<br />

2%<br />

21%<br />

24%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

2%<br />

7%<br />

2%<br />

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Construction<br />

Hotels and Restaurants<br />

Financial intermediation<br />

Public administration & defense<br />

Other community, social and personal services activities<br />

Exterritorial organization<br />

Mining<br />

Electricity, gas, w ater supply<br />

Trade and Utilities<br />

Transport and storage, communications<br />

Real estate renting, business activities<br />

Education, Health, social services<br />

Private house economy w ith hired employment<br />

Table 1-8 Structure of employment In Tbilisi 2004-2005<br />

Structure of employment In Tbilisi 2004 2005<br />

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 6.8 3.1<br />

Mining 0.6 0.5<br />

Manufacturing 33.9 39<br />

Electricity, gas, water supply 7.6 7.9<br />

Constructions 15.4 11.6<br />

Trade and Utilities 71.1 64.4<br />

Hotels and Restaurants 7.7 6.6<br />

Transport and storage, communications 21.2 21.9<br />

Financial intermediation 5.2 6.1<br />

Real estate renting, business activities 16.7 15.2<br />

Public administration & defense 32.5 29.1<br />

Education, Health, social services 67.6 69.1<br />

Other community, social and personal services<br />

activities 19.9 19.7<br />

Private house economy with hired employment 6.5 8.4<br />

Exterritorial organizations 2.9 2.5<br />

Total 315.6 305.1<br />

While the trade and utilities employ the most of workforce, their share decries. Industrial<br />

companies after are slowly improving the crisis. The reforms reduced the public<br />

administration share in the job market.<br />

12


Turnover In business sector<br />

Table 1-9 Turnover in business sector 2001-2005<br />

Turnover in business sector in mln GEL<br />

Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />

2001 3975.2 2133.5 53.7<br />

2002 4595.6 2739.7 59.6<br />

2003 5523 3330 60.3<br />

2004 7248.4 4455.7 61.5<br />

2005 10076.3 6352.8 63.0<br />

Chart 1-5 Turnover in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2005<br />

Turnover in business Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Table 1-10 Changes of business turnover in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

Changes of business turnover (%)<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2002-2001 115.6 128.4<br />

2003-2002 120.2 121.5<br />

2004-2003 131.2 133.8<br />

2005-2004 139.0 142.6<br />

The indicators show how strong economic position of Tbilisi is in the country. Tbilisi<br />

economic share is much higher than its population’s share and the higher economic<br />

growth strengthens Tbilisi’s future position.<br />

13


Turnover and employment<br />

Table 1-11 Turnover in business sector / Employed in 2001 - 2004<br />

Turnover in business sector / Employed<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2001 5.6 6.6<br />

2002 6.7 8.6<br />

2003 7.6 10.5<br />

2004 10.0 14.1<br />

Chart 1-6 Turnover in business sector / Employed in 2001 - 2004<br />

Turnover in business sector / Employed Georgia and<br />

Tbilisi<br />

16,0<br />

14,0<br />

12,0<br />

10,0<br />

8,0<br />

6,0<br />

4,0<br />

2,0<br />

0,0<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Earnings<br />

Table 1-12 Earnings in business sector in 2001 - 2005<br />

Earnings in business sector ( in GEL/ month)<br />

Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />

2001 108.4 128.6 118.6<br />

2002 119.9 132.4 110.4<br />

2003 139.4 154.8 111.0<br />

2004 161.6 184.9 114.4<br />

2005 204.5 229.4 112.2<br />

14


Chart 1-7 Earnings in business sector in 2001 – 2005 in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

Earnings in business sector Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Table 1-13 Dynamics in earnings<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Dynamics<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2002-2001 110.6 103.0<br />

2003-2002 116.3 116.9<br />

2004-2003 115.9 119.4<br />

2005-2004 126.5 124.1<br />

Dynamics 2001-2005<br />

Georgia- total 188.7<br />

Tbilisi 178.4<br />

The indicators show how strong the economic position of Tbilisi is in the country. Tbilisi<br />

economic share is much higher than its population’s share and the higher economic<br />

growth strengthens Tbilisi’s future position. The turnover per employee rate shows how<br />

much more effective Tbilisi companies are. As a result wages are also higher in Tbilisi<br />

than in the whole country.<br />

15


Chart 1-8 Volume of turnover per employee in business sector<br />

2005<br />

Volume of turnover per employee in business<br />

sector in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

25906,70<br />

33616,30<br />

Georgia<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2004<br />

22456,20<br />

29907,20<br />

YEARS<br />

2003<br />

18546,30<br />

23504,70<br />

2002<br />

15252,10<br />

19084,50<br />

2001<br />

15188,50<br />

12685,30<br />

0 10000 20000 30000 40000<br />

Volume in GEL<br />

Chart 1-9 Comparative analysis of turnover and employment in business sector<br />

10 000<br />

Comparative analysis business sector<br />

turnover and employment in Georgia and<br />

Tbilisi ( X-employment, Y-turnover GEL mln)<br />

2005<br />

Georgia_turnover<br />

Georgia_employed<br />

Tbilisi_turnover<br />

Tbilisi_employed<br />

8 000<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

6 000<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2002<br />

4 000<br />

2001<br />

2003<br />

2002<br />

2 000<br />

2001<br />

100 000 150 000 200 000 250 000 300 000 350 000 400 000<br />

16


Chart 1-10 Comparative analysis of employment and earnings in business sector<br />

240<br />

220<br />

Comparative analisis business sector employment<br />

and earnings in Georgia and Tbilisi (X-employment,<br />

Y-earnings in GEL)<br />

2005<br />

Georgia_employed<br />

Georgia_earnings<br />

Tbilisi_employed<br />

Tbilisi_earnings<br />

200<br />

2005<br />

180<br />

2004<br />

160<br />

2004<br />

2003<br />

140<br />

120<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

2003<br />

2002<br />

100<br />

2001<br />

100 000 150 000 200 000 250 000 300 000 350 000 400 000<br />

Chart 1-11 Comparative analysis of turnover per employee and earnings in business sector<br />

35 000<br />

Comparative analisis business sector<br />

turnover per employee and earnings in<br />

Georgia and Tbilisi (X-earnings,Y-turnover<br />

per employee in GEL)<br />

2005<br />

Georgia_turnover_<br />

peremployed<br />

Tbilisi_earnings<br />

Tbilisi_turnover_pe<br />

Tbilisi_earnings<br />

30 000<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

25 000<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

20 000<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

15 000<br />

2001 2002<br />

2001<br />

10 000<br />

120 140 160 180 200 220 240<br />

17


2. City competitiveness<br />

2.1. Factors of city competitiveness<br />

City competitiveness can be defined as the ability to attract and retain citizens, investment<br />

and good quality work places as well as visitors. It is no less important to support city<br />

economy in such a way that city products keep strong position on international markets.<br />

As we continue to move towards a global knowledge economy, the competitive playing<br />

field has shifted dramatically. City-regions are now competing with one another:<br />

• to attract skilled labour;<br />

• to attract new investment and quality jobs;<br />

• for their share of global markets in the city’s export cluster.<br />

In a global knowledge economy, skilled labour, investment and jobs are increasingly<br />

mobile. They can move relatively easily across national boundaries, and between cities.<br />

Products and services compete globally. Sales of these products and services can<br />

generate added value, income, investment and jobs in the region in which they are<br />

produced. It means that cities should build on their strengths. Notably, they can create<br />

partnerships and employment and innovation pacts, bringing together key players within<br />

an area – elected representatives, business leaders, NGOs, interest groups and<br />

universities – to engage in positive and dynamic social and economic development.<br />

Cities should tackle their weaknesses, boosting employability among those groups within<br />

the population which find it hardest to access employment. In some cases, cities compete<br />

directly with other cities for market share, as in the tourism industry, where the character,<br />

attractions and events compete directly to attract tourists and their money. In other cases,<br />

the role of cities in supporting the competitiveness of their exports is more indirect.<br />

As globalization proceeds, cities continue to take centre stage in the global economic<br />

theatre. The relationship between cities is primarily one of intense competition. Ultimately,<br />

a sustained or improved quality of life in particular metropolises depends upon its ability to<br />

compete successfully with other cities and to provide the necessary economic<br />

foundations for growth. Competitive businesses and industries create jobs for residents<br />

and labour force, and assessment revenue for the city that allows it to provide a range of<br />

social, community, physical and other services and programs.<br />

Cities often naturally provide a stimulating environment for innovation and businesses to<br />

flourish and there are steps they can take to further foster this environment. The added<br />

value of city-level actions is that they have more information on the specificities of the<br />

business environment and are able to carry out smaller scale complex actions tackling<br />

multiple interlinked problems. Those are factors that allow cities to successfully compete<br />

with each other.<br />

18


Different factors influence the city competitiveness. The most important ones are listed<br />

below:<br />

• Demographic structure.<br />

• Skilled workforce.<br />

• Quality of life.<br />

• Social diversity.<br />

• City recognition.<br />

• City recognition and reputation.<br />

• Costs of doing business.<br />

• Economic structure.<br />

• Financing.<br />

• Networking.<br />

• Research and development.<br />

• Institutional infrastructure.<br />

• Legal regulations and policies.<br />

• Transport and telecommunication accessibility.<br />

• Technical infrastructure.<br />

Demographic structure - when planning long-term involvement in economic<br />

development the demographic trends such as migration rate, income distribution or age<br />

structure cannot be omitted since they influence the availability of workforce, the<br />

consumers’ buying potential and local business environment.<br />

Skilled workforce -intellectual capital, ingenuity, creativity and technical capabilities<br />

of the labour force are key drivers of economic growth nowadays. This is why the<br />

availability of qualified workforce is a crucial factor when analyzing city competitiveness.<br />

Quality of life - to attract and retain top specialists needed for the city’s economy to<br />

develop, a region needs to provide them with satisfying conditions of living. Safe and<br />

healthy physical environment, diversified opportunities for leisure, rich urban culture,<br />

chances of professional and personal growth are among the main factors influencing<br />

individuals’ decisions regarding their choice of a place of stay.<br />

Social diversity - wealth and poverty distribution, social exclusion phenomena,<br />

community’s social capital are important factors to be taken into consideration when<br />

choosing industries to focus on.<br />

City recognition - being easily recognized in a region and worldwide as a city with<br />

certain industries developed can facilitate the process of attracting international<br />

investments, gaining business partners and entering new markets.<br />

Economic structure - among the key factors influencing the likeliness of business to<br />

succeed are its economic surroundings. This factor includes industrial profile of the<br />

region, developed economy sectors, the quality and extent of supply chains, the<br />

competitiveness of local companies, etc.<br />

Costs of doing business - costs related to companies’ activities are often decisive<br />

when choosing a region for opening a new branch or founding a new company. These<br />

include state and municipal tax levels, land and resources prices, office rents, wages and<br />

so on.<br />

Financing business – such initiatives as expansion to new markets or founding new<br />

companies very often involve finding external financial support. The availability of various<br />

institutions providing local firms with support on different levels, from small credits to joint<br />

venture capitals, influences the chances of product development.<br />

19


Networking - the strength of inter-firm and public-private relationships between<br />

companies, institutions and a government within the region and beyond. High networking<br />

level can seriously boost economic activity within the region, fostering innovation and<br />

enabling the establishment of strategic alliances. Networking can take place both on<br />

informal (random encounters) and formal (conferences, industry associations meetings)<br />

basis.<br />

Institutional infrastructure - the existence and quality of services of various<br />

institutions supporting business, such as research centers, health, education and<br />

community services, companies dealing with finance, legal issues, marketing or<br />

transportation are crucial for business climate in the region.<br />

Legal regulations and policies - policies and programs supporting this kind of<br />

activity and quality of services that public administration provides to the market. These<br />

may include anti-trust law, regulations regarding conditions of entering the market, local<br />

officials willingness to support the branch and such.<br />

Transport and telecommunication accessibility - collecting information and being<br />

able to act fast are becoming increasingly important elements in gaining competitive<br />

advantage. That is why companies are interested in the availability of transportation<br />

channels such as roads, airports, railways, along with telecommunication services –<br />

internet, mobile telephony and such.<br />

Technical infrastructure - the availability of space for doing business (from small<br />

offices for the start-ups and SMEs to greenfield investment land for multinationals),<br />

electricity supply and the presence of basic urban infrastructure such as piped services<br />

(water, sewers) are among the basic elements necessary for businesses to develop.<br />

2.2. Assessment of Tbilisi competitiveness<br />

The competitiveness of Tbilisi was assessed in two aspects:<br />

• its competitiveness in relation to other Georgian cities,<br />

• its competitiveness in relation to other cities in the region of Caucasus and central<br />

Asia.<br />

The assessments were carried out by means of the SWOT method, which is usually<br />

applied by the SRGG when evaluating the competitiveness of cities.<br />

Tbilisi in the country<br />

In order to assess the economic situation of Georgian cities during the workshop session<br />

of the City Team the guests from other Georgian cities evaluated current economic<br />

changes in their environment. They took into consideration the condition of both traditional<br />

and emerging economic sectors, demographic changes and the workforce educational<br />

improvement, the level of technical and urban infrastructure.<br />

The assessments were performed with Tbilisi city team and the guests from Rustavi,<br />

Batumi and Kutaisi<br />

20


The assessment results are presented in the table below.<br />

Table 2-1 City of Tbilisi in the country, assessment results<br />

Demography<br />

Kutaisi Tbilisi. Rustawi Batumi Gori<br />

• population 0 + 0 + -<br />

• natural birth rate + + + + - -<br />

• age structure - - - - - - -<br />

• migrations - - + - 0 -<br />

• suburbanisation 0 +- - - 0<br />

Economy<br />

• traditional economy - - - - + +<br />

• new sectors + ++ + + 0<br />

• institutional infrastructure + ++ + ++ ++<br />

• new city products + ++ + + +<br />

Education<br />

• school education + +++ + ++ ++<br />

• business supply + +++ 0 + +<br />

• vocational trainings 0 +++ 0 + +<br />

Financing resources<br />

• local government ++ +++ ++ ++ ++<br />

• business + + + ++ ++<br />

• citizens + + + + +<br />

Local government<br />

• cooperation with Central ++ +++ + ++ ++<br />

Government<br />

• cooperation with neighbor 0 ++ + + 0<br />

municipalities<br />

• cooperation with citizens ++ ++ + + +<br />

• cooperation with business + +++ + ++ ++<br />

Explanation:<br />

+++ increase more than 75%<br />

++ increase more than 25% less 75%<br />

+ increase more than 25% less 1%<br />

--- decrease more than 1% less 25%<br />

-- decrease more than 25% less 75%<br />

- decrease more than 75%<br />

The results show that all the cities are changing dynamically and their situation is<br />

improving.<br />

In the second phase the city teams carried out the SWOT competitive assessment of their<br />

cities in relation to other Georgian cities.<br />

21


City of Kutaisi<br />

Chart 2-1 City of Kutaisi SWOT analysis<br />

OPPORTUNITIES<br />

2 Business<br />

organizations<br />

6 Reputation<br />

of the City<br />

3 Education system<br />

4 Infrastructure<br />

Weakness<br />

es<br />

1 Workforce<br />

Strengths<br />

5 Quality of life<br />

THREATS<br />

City of Rustavi<br />

Chart 2-2 City of Rustavi SWOT analysis<br />

OPPORTUNITIES<br />

4 Infrastructure<br />

5 Quality of life<br />

1 Workforce<br />

6 Reputation<br />

of the City<br />

Weaknesses<br />

2 Business<br />

organizations<br />

Strengths<br />

3 Education system<br />

THREATS<br />

22


City of Batumi<br />

Chart 2-3 City of Batumi SWOT analysis<br />

OPPORTUNITIES<br />

2 Business<br />

organization<br />

s<br />

1 Workforce<br />

4 Infrastructure<br />

6 Reputation<br />

of the City<br />

Weaknesse<br />

s<br />

3 Education system<br />

Strengths<br />

5 Quality of life<br />

THREATS<br />

The SWOT competitive assessment is based on positioning the key factors of city<br />

competitiveness in a coordinate system. The X axis allows to evaluate factors such as<br />

strong and weak points of the city. The Y axis positions the same factor vertically and<br />

demonstrates the opportunities and threats it will bring in the future. The results of the<br />

SWOT competitive assessment for Batumi, Rustavi, Kutaisi and Tbilisi are presented<br />

below. Finally, Tbilisi team evaluated a complete list of competitiveness factors in their city<br />

in comparison to other cities.<br />

23


Chart 2-4 City of Tbilisi SWOT analysis<br />

CITY OF <strong>TBILISI</strong><br />

IN GEORGIA<br />

OPPORTUNITIES<br />

city<br />

recognition<br />

technical<br />

infrastructure<br />

institutional<br />

infrastructure<br />

economic<br />

structure<br />

transport and telecommunication<br />

accessibility<br />

financing<br />

skilled<br />

workforce<br />

demographic<br />

structure<br />

R&D<br />

legal regulation and policy<br />

quality of life<br />

WEAKNESSES<br />

STRENGTHS<br />

networking<br />

cost of doing business<br />

social<br />

diversity<br />

THREATS<br />

24


While assessing Tbilisi competitiveness in relation to other Georgian cities the teams<br />

identified as its weak points the research and development, traditional structure of<br />

economy, the costs of doing business and starting joint ventures. Also, the technical<br />

infrastructure and the access to financial resources need to be strengthened. The areas<br />

that are the most likely to develop are technical infrastructure and the structure of local<br />

economy.<br />

R&D is likely to improve slightly, while growing costs of doing business is the most<br />

significant threat.<br />

The strongest points are the city recognition and its demographic structure. The good<br />

opportunities of growth have been observed in the areas that have been evaluated as<br />

poorly developed, i.e. in the institutional infrastructure, skilled workforce, transport and<br />

telecommunication accessibility.<br />

Unfortunately, the quality of life is less likely to improve and the risk of social exclusion is<br />

regarded as the most significant threat.<br />

All in all, the following conclusions have been drawn:<br />

• the economic situation in Tbilisi and other Georgian cities is improving,<br />

• further efforts are necessary to improve technical infrastructure that directly<br />

determines the competitiveness of local economy and the growth of local<br />

business,<br />

• in order to achieve the long-term growth capacity it is crucial for the city to improve<br />

local business environment and institutional infrastructure, upgrade workforce<br />

skills and facilitate the availability of investment funds.<br />

Tbilisi in the region<br />

After the collapse of the Soviet Union Georgia is regaining its traditional role in the region.<br />

The country is situated along the transport links connecting Asia with Europe and Tbilisi<br />

plays the role of service centre influencing Caucasus and the neighbouring regions. In the<br />

regional exchange Tbilisi tries to become the central point of:<br />

• economic life with advanced services where the most competitive business of the<br />

region operate from,<br />

• political life with the head offices of international organisations and donor<br />

organisations operating in the region,<br />

• education and research that attract young people from the whole region,<br />

• culture and sport with the most important sports and cultural events in the region,<br />

• tourist industry with the largest number of visitors.<br />

25


The list of Tbilisi competitors in the region includes the cities of Ukraine, Turkey, Russia,<br />

Azerbaijan, Armenia and the countries of central Asia that aspire to the position of the<br />

regional service centre.<br />

Due to the political situation there are no cooperation links in the region and, therefore,<br />

Tbilisi has no competition in Northern Caucasus as well as in the neighbouring parts of<br />

Russia. Moreover, none of the Ukrainian cities attempts to play an active role in<br />

Caucasus so there is no alternative for Tbilisi.<br />

Despite dynamic economic exchange with Turkey, in its eastern part there are no strong<br />

urban centres that could be able to compete with Tbilisi.<br />

That leaves us with Baku and Erevan, the capital cities of Azerbaijan and Armenia as<br />

Tbilisi’s natural and historical rivals. In Central Asia it is Kazakhstan with its strong<br />

political and economic position that boasts the role of a regional leader. Its authorities,<br />

businesses and organisations are very active and have achieved the position of an<br />

important economic partner as well as the key investors in the region.<br />

Kazakh cities, mainly Astana and Alma-Ata, are likely to become regional centres that<br />

influence neighbouring countries and attract investors, events and people. Numerous<br />

investments in Astana and the plans of further local development make the city a regional<br />

leader. Also, the historical, institutional and demographic potential of Alma-Ata positions<br />

this city as another significant competition in the region. The political, social and economic<br />

situation in other countries of Central Asia results in the limited potential of other cities in<br />

the region, so they cannot threaten the leading position of Tbilisi. Therefore, the cities<br />

eventually included in the comparative analysis were Astana, Alma-Ata, Baku and<br />

Erevan.<br />

The City team and the consultants carried out the SWOT analysis of Tbilisi, relating its<br />

position in the region to Astana, Alma-Ata, Baku and Erevan.<br />

By means of the SWOT competitive assessment in the system of coordinates the X axis<br />

(horizontal) the strengths and opportunities of Tbilisi were placed. Taking into<br />

consideration the time factor and analysing the prospective changes that are likely to<br />

happen in Tbilisi and in its rival cities the areas of threats and opportunities were placed<br />

on the Y axis (vertical).<br />

26


Chart 2-5 City of Tbilisi in the region SWOT analysis<br />

<strong>TBILISI</strong> in the<br />

region<br />

OPPORTUNITIES<br />

cost of doing<br />

business<br />

quality of<br />

life<br />

transport and<br />

telecommunication<br />

accessibility<br />

institutional infrastructure<br />

legal regulation a<br />

skilled workforce<br />

financing<br />

technical infrastructure<br />

economic structure<br />

demographic<br />

structure<br />

city recognition<br />

WEAKNESSES<br />

STRENGTHS<br />

networking<br />

social<br />

diversity<br />

R&D<br />

THREATS<br />

27


While assessing the present condition of the elementary city competitiveness factors with<br />

a view to its weak and strong points the team pointed out a particularly weak position of<br />

the Research and development sector and the highly unattractive traditional structure of<br />

local economy. The team found that the capacity to start cooperation links and networking<br />

as well as the accessibility of funds are slightly more satisfying but still poor. Also, the<br />

qualifications of workforce, technical and institutional infrastructure, transport accessibility,<br />

social diversity and the quality of life need to be improved.<br />

In most cases the prospects of improvement were observed. The best opportunities are<br />

likely to be observed in the quality of life and the transport and telecommunications<br />

accessibility. The areas facing the most significant threats are R&D, networking and the<br />

groups threatened by social exclusion of those who do not participate in economic and<br />

life.<br />

The demographic situation was assessed on a medium level. As for strong points of the<br />

city, legal regulations, state policies and the city recognition were ranked the highest.<br />

Other strong points included the costs of doing business, which were most likely to<br />

improve, and the institutional infrastructure. Further reforms will make it possible to<br />

improve legal framework. Ambitious plans of other cities may threaten the recognition of<br />

Tbilisi as the regional centre.<br />

In conclusion, it was pointed out that public intervention is necessary to support the<br />

development of R&D, networking, the city recognition, workforce skills, availability of<br />

financial resources and technical infrastructure. With regard to the technical infrastructure<br />

it seems necessary to expand space for business activities, i.e. to developed land for<br />

industrial, logistic and office activities with full infrastructure for services. Special attention<br />

was paid to meeting the requirements of start-ups, mainly to regulations that make<br />

establishing a business cheaper and less time-consuming.<br />

28


3. Identification of competitive advantages of Tbilisi economy<br />

3.1. Identification of city products<br />

The first part of the assessment includes a list of products, services and goods<br />

offered by companies and institutions in Tbilisi. In order to estimate their attractiveness the<br />

following criteria have been chosen that are the most significant in the present situation of<br />

Tbilisi:<br />

• Market growth potential<br />

• Product growth potential<br />

• Job creation potential<br />

• Tbilisi specific advantages.<br />

While selecting these criteria we mainly focused on:<br />

Market growth potential: The likeliness of the market to grow has the impact on future<br />

opportunities for product development, geographical expansion and securing sufficient<br />

income to make the industry self-sustainable. Investments in rising markets are promising in<br />

terms of future growth of employment rates and of the number of developing companies<br />

cooperating with the industry.<br />

Product growth potential: Growth potential is one of the most critical factors in product<br />

analysis since high-growth industries tend to yield higher profits, more workplaces and higher<br />

wages. This is why it should be carefully analyzed, taking into particular consideration its<br />

future perspectives, crucial resources and international market assessment.<br />

Job creation potential: Market’s capability of creating high levels of employment in<br />

short to medium term.<br />

Tbilisi specific advantages: Tbilisi’s competitive advantages allowing the product<br />

market to develop and contribute back to the city’s growth.<br />

Over twenty products were evaluated. The final opinion was based on the number of<br />

points assigned to an individual product. The products that were least attractive according to<br />

a given criterion received zero points, medium attractiveness was rewarded with one point<br />

and the high one – with two points.<br />

29


Table 3-1 City of Tbilisi products evaluation<br />

Product<br />

market<br />

growth<br />

potential<br />

product<br />

growth<br />

potential<br />

job<br />

creation<br />

potential<br />

Tbilisi<br />

unique<br />

adventage<br />

Score<br />

Primary and secondary education 1 1 1 1 4<br />

Higher education 1 1 1 2 5<br />

Vocational trainings 1 1 1 0 3<br />

Hospital and health care services 0 0 1 1 2<br />

Public administration 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Social services 1 1 1 0 3<br />

Finacial services 1 1 1 1 4<br />

Advisory and consulting 2 1 1 1 5<br />

IT services 2 2 2 1 7<br />

Media products and services 2 2 1 1 6<br />

Design services 1 1 1 1 4<br />

Telecomunication services 2 2 2 1 7<br />

transportation and logistic 2 2 2 1 7<br />

Retail trade 2 2 1 1 6<br />

Wholesale trade 1 1 1 1 4<br />

Storage and confection 1 1 1 1 4<br />

Constructions 2 2 1 1 6<br />

Industrial products 0<br />

Mashinery and equipment 1 1 1 0 3<br />

Cosmetics and pharmaceutics 2 1 1 0 4<br />

Oil products 0 1 1 0 2<br />

Textail, aparel and cloths 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Aviation products 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Timber products 1 1 0 0 2<br />

Building materials 1 1 1 0 3<br />

Conferences and trainings 2 2 2 1 7<br />

Trade fairs and shows 1 1 1 1 4<br />

Historical monuments and city<br />

architecture 0 0 0 1 1<br />

Hotels, motels and private<br />

accommodation 1 1 2 1 5<br />

Restaurants and clubs 2 2 2 2 8<br />

Galleries, museums and theatres 1 1 1 2 5<br />

Georgian music and dances 1 1 1 2 5<br />

Cultural and sport events 1 1 1 2 5<br />

Recreational tourism 2 2 2 2 8<br />

Heritage tourism 2 2 2 2 8<br />

Business tourism 2 2 2 1 7<br />

Spa and wellness 2 2 1 0 5<br />

Space for offices 2 2 2 1 7<br />

Housing - flats, apartments and houses 2 2 2 1 7<br />

Industrial estate 1 1 2 1 5<br />

Georgian food 0 0 1 2 3<br />

Georgian vine 1 1 1 2 5<br />

Mineral waters 1 1 1 1 4<br />

30


On the basis of this assessment the results of potentially promising clusters for<br />

further evaluation were identified:<br />

• Creative cluster<br />

• Industrial cluster<br />

• Financial cluster<br />

• Education cluster<br />

• Transport and logistic cluster<br />

• Construction and real estate cluster<br />

• Tourism cluster.<br />

3.2. Identification of promising Tbilisi clusters<br />

Clusters has become a new tool for developing local and regional economic<br />

development strategies. City economies can grow around dynamic clusters which offer<br />

firms the best external spillovers and synergies. City representatives need a tool that<br />

would allow them to identify local promising clusters, that have growth potential, can<br />

generate new work places and can be competitive at international markets. Analysis is<br />

intended to help the city leaders to better allocate resources intended for city economic<br />

development by focusing investment in local business activity toward growing clusters<br />

and by convincing firms to locate in these clusters.<br />

The methodology that was utilized for the identification of promising industrial clusters in<br />

Tbilisi is based on the analysis of market attractiveness developed by McKinsey &<br />

Company to improve the allocation of corporate funds toward investments in new<br />

markets.<br />

An aim of McKinsey & Co’s analysis is to assess the attractiveness of a market using a<br />

multitude of indicators. In their opinion it better reflects the complexities of a sector and<br />

allow to understand that market attractiveness is a function of several various<br />

components. Indicators correspond to three major -categories that are descriptive of the<br />

market:<br />

• market potential;<br />

• market structure;<br />

• external environment.<br />

Several sub-categories fall under each of these three. The market potential is assessed<br />

by estimating the market size, market saturation, and the market growth rate. Market<br />

structure is composed of suppliers, buyers, substitute products, and intensity of rivalry.<br />

The external environment comprises of the general economic conditions, political<br />

situation, technology, and societal factors.<br />

Each sub-category is assessed using a set of quantitative or qualitative data using<br />

attractiveness ranges. To final evaluation they weigh each sub-category score by its<br />

relative percentage importance to market attractiveness. The weights to each subcategory<br />

score are subjective, depending on their relative importance, but when summed<br />

they must add to 100 percent. The weighted scores are then summed to give a final score<br />

of market attractiveness that ranges from a least attractive score to most attractive score.<br />

31


It is the advantage of this method that it:<br />

• can assess several different factors and gives one common denominator<br />

• is flexible and the assessed categories and subcategories can be changed<br />

• weights can always reflect local conditions and interest of stakeholders<br />

In addition, the methodology is flexible in that the categories can be changed depending<br />

on the characteristics of the evaluated markets. For instance, the weights can be changed<br />

to reflect the importance of different categories to various markets.<br />

The evaluation of the city products has made it possible to identify and assess local<br />

clusters. In the analytical process the following potential clusters have been identified:<br />

• Financial 1.1<br />

• Education 1.1<br />

• Real estate 1.2<br />

• Transport and logistics 1.2<br />

• Industry 0.7<br />

• Touristic 1.3<br />

• Small and medium enterprises 1.2<br />

The clusters have been assessed in three categories: of their market potential, market<br />

structure and environment.<br />

Financial cluster<br />

Table 3-2 Financial cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />

Indicators of Cluster<br />

Attractiveness<br />

Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />

low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />

Score<br />

I. Market Potential<br />

45% 0.6<br />

→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />

→ Output Growth X 10% 0.1<br />

→ Average Wages and<br />

employment X 20% 0.2<br />

II. Market Structure<br />

20% 0.25<br />

→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Substitute Products X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />

III. External Environment<br />

35% 0.25<br />

→Economic Conditions X 10% 0.1<br />

→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Technology X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Societal Factors X 15% 0<br />

IV. Total Score<br />

100% 1.1<br />

The financial cluster has a high market potential and a medium potential of products<br />

currently offered in Tbilisi. It also demonstrates a medium rate of the job market increase<br />

as well as a medium salary level. As for the market structure the financial cluster has an<br />

advantage of the lack of substitutes and of an easy access to new technological and<br />

organisational solutions. The environment means mainly the<br />

32


application of new technologies. The political situation in the country as well as its<br />

economic situation are moderately attractive. Social indices indicate low attractiveness for<br />

the cluster’s services, which probably results from the general economic situation of both<br />

local residents and businesses. The financial cluster has received a general mark of 1.1<br />

(the maximum mark is 2.0), which means that the cluster’s attractiveness and its growth<br />

perspectives slightly exceed the medium level. It should be noted, however, that the<br />

cluster is going to develop more dynamically when the local economy and the local<br />

residents’ economic situation grow.<br />

Education cluster<br />

Table 3-3 Education cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />

Indicators of Cluster<br />

Attractiveness<br />

Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />

low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />

Score<br />

I. Market Potential<br />

45% 0.5<br />

→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />

→ Output Growth X 10% 0.2<br />

→ Average Wages and<br />

employment X 20% 0<br />

II. Market Structure<br />

20% 0.3<br />

→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Substitute Products X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0.1<br />

III. External Environment<br />

35% 0.5<br />

→Economic Conditions X 10% 0.1<br />

→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Technology X 5% 0<br />

→ Societal Factors X 15% 0.3<br />

IV. Total Score<br />

100% 1.3<br />

The education cluster demonstrates high growth potential due to the increased demand<br />

for re-training services for adults and young people’s educational needs. Because of the<br />

economic conditions in which local educational organisations operate the existing<br />

education product has a medium growth potential. Over-supply of teachers as well as<br />

low salaries do not provide favourable conditions for higher benefits and more<br />

employment in the sector. The sector market structure and its environment are highly<br />

attractive due to many customers, the shortage of alternatives, the political situation and<br />

social expectations. Low marks concerning the cluster’s attractiveness result from the<br />

employment and salary growth parameters, insufficient use of new technologies as well<br />

as from low productivity. The constructed corporate city development plans should<br />

particularly focus on the education cluster. With its good didactic and training facilities, a<br />

market oriented offer and highly qualified stuff the cluster will obviously become one of the<br />

fastest growing segments of local market. Its potential will be even more important as a<br />

support to one of the main factors of the city competitiveness, i.e. the skilled workforce<br />

33


Real estate cluster.<br />

Table 3-4 Real estate cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />

Indicators of Cluster<br />

Attractiveness<br />

Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />

low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />

Score<br />

I. Market Potential<br />

45% 0.7<br />

→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />

→ Output Growth X 10% 0.2<br />

→ Average Wages and<br />

employment X 20% 0.2<br />

II. Market Structure<br />

20% 0.2<br />

→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Substitute Products X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />

III. External Environment<br />

35% 0.3<br />

→Economic Conditions X 10% 0<br />

→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Technology X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Societal Factors X 15% 0.2<br />

IV. Total Score<br />

100% 1.2<br />

The analysis of processes occurring on the real estate market requires long time series,<br />

because their nature is related to long-term trade cycles. In case of Tbilisi is a difficult task<br />

due to the economic transformation and political changes. Moreover, the reliability of data<br />

collected in previous years is undermined by the discrepancies between the official and<br />

market prices. The real estate and construction cluster in Tbilisi is characterised by high<br />

dynamics of the market potential and high potential of product growth. The parameters<br />

that apparently diminish its attractiveness include strong competition and people’s low<br />

economic potential. It is obvious that an important element of the cluster growth is the<br />

programme aiming at keeping systematic record of available land, which will allow the city<br />

to build a land market. The economic development is going to stimulate the real estate<br />

market both in the housing construction sector and in office, storage and industrial<br />

construction sector. Also the demand for new operating areas for trade companies is<br />

going to grow.<br />

34


Transportation cluster.<br />

Table 3-5 Transportation cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />

Indicators of Cluster<br />

Attractiveness<br />

Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />

low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />

Score<br />

I. Market Potential<br />

45% 0.6<br />

→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />

→ Output Growth X 10% 0.1<br />

→ Average Wages and<br />

employment X 20% 0.2<br />

II. Market Structure<br />

20% 0.1<br />

→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Substitute Products X 5% 0<br />

→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />

III. External<br />

Environment 35% 0.5<br />

→Economic Conditions X 10% 0<br />

→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Technology X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Societal Factors X 15% 0.3<br />

IV. Total Score<br />

100% 1.2<br />

The attractiveness of the cluster related to transport and logistics companies results<br />

mainly from the geographical location of Tbilisi where main Georgian and international<br />

transport routes meet.<br />

The globalisation of manufacturing and the related supply chains increase the demand for<br />

transport services. Logistics is getting increasingly important not only in Georgia itself, but<br />

also as a part of international economic relations. When assessing the attractiveness of<br />

the cluster the high marks have been given to the development potential and the products<br />

(services) growth potential. The general mark of 1.2 places the cluster slightly below the<br />

average, but the worldwide trends indicate that this cluster will develop dynamically in the<br />

future.<br />

The growth of commodity transportation logistics is first of all related to the economic<br />

activity and is defined as the industry task. Main areas of the city intervention include<br />

mainly giving access to developed land, promoting innovation and workforce training<br />

35


Industry cluster.<br />

Table 3-6 Industry cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />

Indicators of Cluster<br />

Attractiveness<br />

Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />

low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />

Score<br />

I. Market Potential<br />

45% 0.3<br />

→ Market Potential X 15% 0<br />

→ Output Growth X 10% 0.1<br />

→ Average Wages and<br />

employment X 20% 0.2<br />

II. Market Structure<br />

20% 0<br />

→ Suppliers X 5% 0<br />

→ Buyers X 5% 0<br />

→ Substitute Products X 5% 0<br />

→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />

III. External Environment<br />

35% 0.4<br />

→Economic Conditions X 10% 0<br />

→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Technology X 5% 0<br />

→ Societal Factors X 15% 0.3<br />

IV. Total Score<br />

100% 0.7<br />

The industry cluster has been marked as the least attractive. The old system left<br />

businesses closely dependent on the Russian markets and carrying the burden of high<br />

fixed costs. Consequently most of traditional industry companies closed down. Because<br />

of growing productivity, that has resulted from the use of new technologies, and stronger<br />

competition mainly of Asiatic countries the industrial sector is not very attractive. Apart<br />

form highly rated political situation and social indices the other attractiveness parameters<br />

of the cluster demonstrate low values. Therefore, it has been assessed well below the<br />

average. The revitalisation of buildings and warehouses that used to belong to closeddown<br />

production plants should become one of the priorities while creating the economic<br />

development plan for Tbilisi. Also the workers who have been made redundant should be<br />

re-trained and instructed how to find new jobs.<br />

36


Creative cluster<br />

Table 3-7 Creative cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />

Indicators of Cluster<br />

Attractiveness<br />

Assessment of Attractiveness Weights Score<br />

low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />

I. Market Potential<br />

45% 0.7<br />

→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />

→ Output Growth X 10% 0.2<br />

→ Average Wages and<br />

employment X 20% 0.2<br />

II. Market Structure<br />

€ 20% 0.2<br />

→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Substitute Products X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />

III. External<br />

Environment 35% 0.3<br />

→Economic Conditions X 10% 0.1<br />

→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Technology X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Societal Factors X 15% 0<br />

IV. Total Score<br />

100% 1.2<br />

The support for the development of small and medium businesses entering new sectors<br />

of new economy and using latest organisational and technological solutions should be a<br />

key element of Tbilisi economic development strategy. The cluster has been marked 1.2,<br />

which means that its attractiveness is above the average. It is its market growth potential<br />

and the potential of created products that should be assessed particularly high. In the<br />

situation when the traditional sectors of economy have collapsed as a result of economic<br />

and political transformation, small and medium enterprises generate the largest number<br />

of jobs. It is SMEs that fuel local economy and implement innovative solutions. Thanks to<br />

the city’s support for projects dealing with microcredits, credit security funds,<br />

entrepreneurship incubators, technology parks, promotion of local business, etc. the<br />

cluster is likely to grow the fastest and, consequently, to create new jobs. The cooperation<br />

of local authorities and the local business can contribute to improving not only the city<br />

economic parameters but also the local quality of life and the standards of offered<br />

services. In the longer perspective the companies in this sector are going to generate<br />

larger and larger share of the added value and attract more and more external capital that<br />

will finance new investments.<br />

37


Touristic cluster<br />

Table 3-8 Touristic cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />

Indicators of Cluster<br />

Attractiveness<br />

Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />

low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />

Score<br />

I. Market Potential<br />

45% 0.5<br />

→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />

→ Output Growth X 10% 0.2<br />

→ Average Wages and<br />

employment X 20% 0<br />

II. Market Structure<br />

20% 0.2<br />

→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Substitute Products X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />

III. External Environment<br />

35% 0.7<br />

→Economic Conditions X 10% 0.2<br />

→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Technology X 5% 0.1<br />

→ Societal Factors X 15% 0.3<br />

IV. Total Score<br />

100% 1.3<br />

The touristic cluster has received the highest mark of all the identified potential clusters.<br />

Its attractiveness results from the high market potential, the high potential of products<br />

(services) growth as well as of the high quality of its environment. Thanks to its cultural,<br />

architectural, social and historical values the touristic cluster is likely to make the city<br />

attractive to both occasional visitors and organised groups. The large number of financial<br />

institutions, international business corporations and support organisations operating in<br />

Tbilisi is a good basis for creating a wide range of offers for business tourism. Thanks to<br />

the stable political and economic situation a growing number of visitors are interested in<br />

Tbilisi, as well as in Georgia. Tourist potential includes the historic buildings, local culture<br />

and cuisine as well as local landscapes and nature. Also in this case the city should<br />

initiate and support projects helping local tourist industry who are aiming at building an<br />

integrated system of tourist information and a complex offer addressed to various types of<br />

tourism. The integration of the environment institutions can have a positive effect on the<br />

quality of the tourist offer<br />

38


`


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

1. Economies in transition - development trends of emerging markets.................................................. 4<br />

1.1. The analysis of trends for key industries of Tbilisi economy. ................................................................. 6<br />

2. Challenges and obstacles of Tbilisi new economy development.......................................................23<br />

2.1. Development opportunities of Tbilisi new economy .............................................................................23<br />

2.2. Identification of development barrieries.................................................................................................25<br />

2.2.1. Creative cluster survey results .......................................................................................................25<br />

2.2.2. Tourism cluster survey results........................................................................................................31<br />

3. Attracting Tbilisi to investors ....................................................................................................................36<br />

3.1. Tbilisi territorial development according to the basic historical stages.................................................36<br />

3.2. Tbilisi territorial structure.........................................................................................................................37<br />

3.3. New trends of Tbilisi city functional-spatial development under new social-economic<br />

conditions ................................................................................................................................................38<br />

3.4. Allocation of new development projects ................................................................................................41<br />

4. Tbilisi alternative development strategies ..............................................................................................45<br />

5. How Tbilisi can support new economy development ...........................................................................53


CHARTS<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

TABLES


In the second half of the 20th century the economy of Tbilisi was based on<br />

industrial plants producing for the demand of the Soviet Union market.<br />

Cooperation links, legal regulations, transport infrastructure and business<br />

environment were oriented at satisfying the needs of this type of economy,<br />

therefore the change of production profile of entering new markets were<br />

hardly possible.<br />

After the collapse of the Soviet Union and, consequently, of the centrally<br />

managed economy many manufacturing firms in Tbilisi lost their markets and<br />

either closed down or reduced their employment and production. The system<br />

reform, introduction of market economy and opening to new markets resulted<br />

in a thorough transformation of Tbilisi economy.<br />

Although some positive effects can be observed, the transformation process<br />

is long and generates serious social problems and costs. In order to<br />

understand the ongoing changes, we cannot view the problem as merely a<br />

systematic one. The economy of Tbilisi is also influenced by other economic<br />

transformation factors that do not happen only in the post-communist<br />

countries, but are observed all over the world. These factors are:<br />

• globalisation and increasingly free flow of knowledge and ideas,<br />

capital, products and services as well as people among the regions<br />

and cities of the world,<br />

• the use of new technology by businesses, state and local<br />

governments as well as by ordinary people,<br />

• cultural changes in the family model and life aspirations of the young<br />

generation.<br />

Due to the overlapping effects of regained independence and system<br />

transformation on the other three universal processes both Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

are facing a great challenge.<br />

Public officials as well as entrepreneurs and ordinary residents of Tbilisi must<br />

understand the ongoing changes and their implications in order to take a<br />

maximum advantage of new opportunities. They have to reduce the social<br />

costs to minimum and concentrate their resources in the areas where the<br />

perspectives of growth are the most promising.


In order to strengthen the foundations of Georgia’s and Tbilisi’s new economic<br />

position and to maximise the effects of the transformation system, it is vital to<br />

introduce the following changes and reforms:<br />

1. The deep reform of Georgian economy resulted in the fact that<br />

environment regulators can facilitate establishing and running business on<br />

the terms equal to those in the developed countries with market economy.<br />

2. Building new transport and telecommunication infrastructures, that will<br />

connect Georgia with the partners in the region and in the world, will make<br />

it possible to export and import goods and services.<br />

3. The reform of the education system and introducing the culture of life long<br />

learning to instruct skilled workforce according to the standards of the<br />

global job market.<br />

4. Investments in technical infrastructure and the city revitalisation make<br />

Tbilisi an attractive place to live and do business.<br />

Phases of the city economy transformation process<br />

Transformation of an industrial town into a postindustrial city is a long-lasting<br />

and complex process. The examples of cities that have already undergone<br />

this process offer experience that is worth using when working on Tbilisi<br />

economic development plan.<br />

In the process of transformation three phases can be distinguished:<br />

• crisis of a traditional industrial town,<br />

• attracting foreign investors to the city,<br />

• inward development based on unique identity and own resources.<br />

The phases can overlap and their duration cannot be determined in advance.<br />

The intensity and directions of changes depend on the local actors, their<br />

cooperation and capability to implement plans.<br />

The first phase include:<br />

• a substantial amount of workforce is made redundant in industry<br />

sector,<br />

• entrepreneurs set up service and trading companies that do not<br />

require much capital,<br />

• deprivation of industrial districts,<br />

• deprivation of housing districts with low skilled communities,<br />

• development of informal sector,<br />

• education sector have no clear perspectives and teaching standards<br />

in new professions.<br />

Finding foreign investors make it possible to introduce to the economy the<br />

elements that in the first phase are available locally, such as:<br />

• capital,<br />

• new technologies in production and management,<br />

• new standards of employees’ recruitment,<br />

• new cooperation links with other national economies,<br />

• new products that are competitive on global markets.


It is hard to overestimate those benefits for the city economy that are<br />

generated by foreign investors, but we should not forget that the reasons why<br />

those firm invest in our cit must be thoroughly analysed. It will help us to take<br />

maximum advantage of these investments and prevent disappointment if our<br />

expectations are unrealistic.<br />

Foreign firms invest in order to:<br />

• lower the production costs,<br />

• increase the value of the invested capital,<br />

• enter new markets,<br />

• gain access to resources that are out of reach where they have been<br />

operating so far.<br />

In a longer perspective these companies transfer their business activity to new<br />

locations that provide them with better business environment.<br />

For a long-term competitiveness of the city economy the third phase is of key<br />

importance. It is based on endogenic potentials and the city identity.<br />

The development of local businesses also leads to new quality of cooperation<br />

with foreign investors who invest their capital not only to benefit from the<br />

consumption potential of the local market and from lower production costs,<br />

but are also interested in finding new partners who will give them access to<br />

better solutions. It means that financial relations change too – the investor not<br />

only bears the costs of their business activity, but also shares their profits with<br />

a local partner.<br />

<br />

In order to prepare guidelines on o available economic activities it was<br />

necessary to analyze thoroughly the industries of the strongest development<br />

potential in the city of Tbilisi.<br />

The Competitiveness Assessment report analyzed the role of Tbilisi economy<br />

in the national economy as well as the city’s competitive position among other<br />

cities in Georgia and in the region of Caucasus and Central Asia. Thanks to<br />

the application of proposed indicators, the SWOT analysis of competitiveness<br />

assessment both on the regional and the national level as well as due to the<br />

results of the City team’s and outside partners’ work, a further and deeper<br />

analysis was possible of these sectors which demonstrate a high growth<br />

dynamics and can create new jobs.<br />

- Tourist sector - hotel business mainly<br />

- Construction<br />

- Enterprises of trade, repair of vehicles, personal & household goods<br />

- Industry<br />

- Banking<br />

The competitiveness assessment report described the importance and links<br />

among the key clusters as well as their role in seeking opportunities for the<br />

future local economy. Guidelines on available economic activities are based<br />

on the analysis of these of the industries that demonstrate the highest growth<br />

of economic parameters and create the most significant number of jobs.<br />

Therefore, the Guidelines recommend certain measures to be taken in order<br />

to take the best advantage of the opportunities identified for Tbilisi.<br />

When analyzing the clusters a common methodology was adopted which had<br />

been developed by the City team and the outside partners during their work<br />

on the Tbilisi Competitiveness assessment. The analysis covers the period of<br />

2000- 2006 and compares the situation of individual industries in Tbilisi with


the rest of the country. In each of the industries the following parameters were<br />

studied: turnover, employment, salaries, the relation of the salaries to the ones<br />

in the whole business sector and the relation between the turnover and the<br />

employment in the examined years.<br />

<br />

Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

Hotels turnover in regions in mln GEL in 2006<br />

63,6<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

Percent<br />

Over 80% of revenue in<br />

the hotel industry is<br />

generated in Tbilisi. Two<br />

out of other regions of<br />

Georgia, i.e. Adjara and<br />

Mtsheta generate app.<br />

10% of the turnover. The<br />

last 10% are generated<br />

by the remaining<br />

regions.<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

7,5<br />

3,4<br />

Tbilisi Adjara Mtsheta<br />

Mtianeti<br />

0,7 0,4 0,1 0,1<br />

Guria Imereti Kakheti Racha<br />

Lekhumi<br />

0%<br />

<br />

4 000<br />

3 000<br />

Hotels employment in regions in 2006<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

Also, the employment in<br />

the hotel industry is the<br />

highest in Tbilisi, but<br />

Adjar and Mtshet are<br />

catching up.<br />

Employment<br />

2 000<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

Percent<br />

1 000<br />

1 668<br />

20%<br />

1 053<br />

0<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Adjara<br />

295 264<br />

142<br />

60 55 40 30 29 28<br />

0%<br />

Mtsheta Mtianeti<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Imereti<br />

Guria<br />

Kakheti<br />

Kvemo Kartli


Georgia turnover in hotels in mln GEL<br />

90,00<br />

80,00<br />

70,00<br />

60,00<br />

50,00<br />

40,00<br />

30,00<br />

Turnover in hotels in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

2006<br />

2005<br />

2004<br />

2003<br />

2002<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

In 2001-2006 a<br />

regular increase of<br />

hotel industry<br />

turnover was<br />

observed both in<br />

Tbilisi and in the<br />

whole Georgia. In the<br />

years of 2005 and<br />

2006 the turnover<br />

values doubled in<br />

comparison to 2004<br />

20,00<br />

2001<br />

0,00 20,00 40,00 60,00 80,00<br />

Tbilisi turnover in hotels in mln GEL<br />

<br />

Tbilisi turnover in hotels in mln GEL<br />

80,00<br />

60,00<br />

40,00<br />

20,00<br />

Turnover vs employment in hotels in<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2003<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

Simultaneously to the<br />

2001-2006 turnover<br />

leap Tbilisi hotel<br />

industry saw the<br />

increase in<br />

employment. 2003<br />

was the only year<br />

when employment<br />

levels fell below 2001<br />

values despite<br />

growing turnover<br />

0,00<br />

1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700<br />

Tbilisi employment in hotels


Earnings in Tbilisi in business sector in GEL<br />

400<br />

380<br />

360<br />

340<br />

320<br />

300<br />

280<br />

260<br />

240<br />

220<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

Earnings in business and tourism sector<br />

2006<br />

2005<br />

2004<br />

2003<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

In comparison to the<br />

private sector the<br />

earnings in the tourist<br />

sector were growing<br />

at a slower rate and<br />

in the years of 2004-<br />

2005 a even a certain<br />

decrease could be<br />

observed.<br />

Nevertheless, when<br />

compared with 2001<br />

the salaries in the<br />

tourist sector almost<br />

doubled, while in the<br />

private sector they<br />

more than tripled<br />

100<br />

100 120 140 160 180 200 220<br />

Avarage earnings in turist sector in Georgia<br />

in GEL<br />

<br />

100 000<br />

80 000<br />

60 000<br />

40 000<br />

Comparative analysis of turnover (Y axis - in<br />

mln GEL) and employment in hotels ( X axis)<br />

in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

Georgia turnover<br />

in hotels total<br />

Georgia<br />

employment in<br />

hotels total<br />

Tbilisi turnover in<br />

hotels<br />

Tbilisi employment<br />

in hotels<br />

The high rate at<br />

which turnover and<br />

employment grew in<br />

the hotel industry was<br />

seen both in Tbilisi<br />

and throughout<br />

Georgia. The<br />

increase of these two<br />

parameters was<br />

determined first of all<br />

by a significant<br />

growth dynamics in<br />

Tbilisi itself.<br />

20 000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

0<br />

1 000 1 500 2 000 2 500 3 000 3 500 4 000


Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />

1 200<br />

1 000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

Construction turnover in regions in 2006<br />

760<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

Percent<br />

In 2006 Tbilisi saw<br />

the highest values in<br />

Georgia of both the<br />

turnover and the<br />

employment in<br />

construction industry<br />

200<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

80<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Adjara<br />

44 42 37 35 21 18 16 6 4<br />

0%<br />

Imereti<br />

Guria<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

Kvemo Kartli<br />

Kakheti turn<br />

<br />

Employment<br />

50 000<br />

40 000<br />

30 000<br />

20 000<br />

Construction employment in regions in 2006<br />

100%<br />

75%<br />

50%<br />

Percent<br />

The construction<br />

industry in Tbilisi<br />

generated almost<br />

80% of total turnover<br />

and employed about<br />

60% of all the<br />

construction workers.<br />

10 000<br />

23 513<br />

25%<br />

0<br />

Kvemo Kartli<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Tbilisi<br />

3 553 3 215 2 617 1 852 1 624 1 322 1 121 682 484 359<br />

Adjara<br />

Imereti<br />

Kakheti<br />

Guria<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

0%<br />

Racha Lekhumi


Construction turnover in Georgia in mln GEL<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

Turnover in construction sector in<br />

Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

After the period of<br />

2000-2004 when the<br />

construction industry<br />

grew slowly, the<br />

years of 2005-2006<br />

brought a dynamic<br />

growth of turnover. .<br />

2001<br />

200<br />

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800<br />

Construction turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />

<br />

Construction turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

Turnover vs employment in<br />

construction sector in Tbilisi<br />

2002<br />

2003 2001<br />

2004<br />

2006<br />

2005<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

Also the employment<br />

in constructions<br />

increased<br />

significantly in 2005.<br />

Unfortunately,<br />

despite the rise in<br />

turnover in the<br />

following year the<br />

employment<br />

practically stayed at<br />

the same level<br />

100<br />

8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 22000<br />

Construction employment in Tbilisi


Construction turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

Turnover vs earnings in construction<br />

sector in Tbilisi<br />

2001<br />

2002 2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

Along the increase in<br />

employment the<br />

earnings in the<br />

construction industry<br />

were growing as<br />

well. A significant<br />

rise in salaries was<br />

observed in 2005-<br />

2006.<br />

100<br />

100 200 300 400 500<br />

Earnings in construction sector in Tbilisi in<br />

GEL<br />

<br />

Earnings in business sector in Tbilisi in GEL<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

Earnings in business sector vs earnings in<br />

construction sector in Tbilisi<br />

2001 2002 2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

Also, if compared to<br />

the salaries in the<br />

whole private sector,<br />

the earnings in the<br />

construction industry<br />

in Tbilisi were<br />

growing<br />

systematically in the<br />

period of 2001-2006<br />

with the most<br />

considerable rise in<br />

2006<br />

100<br />

100 200 300 400 500<br />

Earnings in construction sector in Tbilisi in<br />

GEL


1 000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

Comparative analysis turnover (Y axis - in<br />

mln GEL) and employment (X axis) in<br />

Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

2002<br />

2006<br />

2005<br />

2004<br />

2006<br />

2005<br />

Construction<br />

turnover in Georgia<br />

Construction<br />

employment in<br />

Georogia<br />

Construction<br />

turnover in Tbilisi<br />

Construction<br />

employment in Tbilisi<br />

The rise in<br />

turnover and<br />

employment<br />

could be<br />

observed both in<br />

Tbilisi and<br />

throughout<br />

Georgia. In the<br />

last two years<br />

both parameters<br />

grew<br />

considerably,<br />

which indicates a<br />

boom in the<br />

construction<br />

industry in<br />

Georgia.<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2001<br />

200<br />

2003<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

10000 20000 30000 40000


Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />

6 000<br />

5 000<br />

4 000<br />

3 000<br />

2 000<br />

Turnover in enterprises of trade, repair of<br />

vehicles, personal & household goods in regions<br />

in 2006<br />

3 693<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

Percent<br />

Also in the trade sector<br />

Tbilisi has a leading<br />

role in the regions of<br />

Georgia. About 70% of<br />

total turnover in the<br />

trade sector are<br />

generated in Tbilisi<br />

1 000<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Guria turn<br />

Tbilisi<br />

422<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

Adjara<br />

272 194 192 146 92 86 38 22 5<br />

0%<br />

Imereti<br />

Kakheti<br />

Kvemo Kartlii<br />

<br />

Employment<br />

50 000<br />

40 000<br />

30 000<br />

20 000<br />

Employment in enterprises of trade, repair of<br />

vehicles, personal & household goods in<br />

regions in 2006<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

Percent<br />

Approximately 50% of<br />

people working in the<br />

trade sector are<br />

employed in Tbilisi. The<br />

fact that the employment<br />

in other parts of Georgia<br />

is rather high in relation<br />

to the declared income<br />

means that a lot of<br />

people in Georgia deal<br />

with trade to satisfy their<br />

elementary needs<br />

10 000<br />

24 310<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

6 378 4 714 3 647 2 880 2 777 1 707 1 168 882 728 362<br />

0%<br />

Kvemo Kartli<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Guria_empl<br />

Adjara<br />

Imereti<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Kakheti<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti


Trade turnover in Georgia in mln GEL<br />

5000,0<br />

4000,0<br />

3000,0<br />

2000,0<br />

Turnover in enterprises of trade, repair<br />

of vehicles, personal & household goods<br />

in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

The turnover in the trade<br />

sector is growing<br />

dynamically both in<br />

Tbilisi and in the rest of<br />

Georgia. It has been<br />

particularly apparent in<br />

the last three years<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

1000,0<br />

1000,0 2000,0 3000,0 4000,0<br />

Trade turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />

<br />

Trade turnover in Tbillisi in mln GEL<br />

4000,0<br />

3000,0<br />

2000,0<br />

Turnover vs employment in enterprises of<br />

trade, repair of vehicles, personal &<br />

household goods in Tbilisi<br />

2006<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

When comparing the<br />

dynamics of the revenue<br />

and employment growth<br />

in the last six years it is<br />

obvious that these two<br />

parameters were<br />

interrelated until 2005. In<br />

2006, despite further rise<br />

in turnover, the<br />

employment fell.<br />

1000,0<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

15000 20000 25000 30000 35000<br />

Trade employment in Tbilisi


Trade turnover in Tbillisi in mln GEL<br />

4000,0<br />

3000,0<br />

2000,0<br />

1000,0<br />

Turnover vs monthly earnings in<br />

enterprises of trade, repair of vehicles,<br />

personal & household goods in Tbilisi<br />

2003<br />

2002<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

A different situation can<br />

be observed when<br />

comparing the dynamics<br />

of turnover growth in the<br />

trade sector with rising<br />

salaries in the private<br />

sector. In this case a<br />

dynamic increase of<br />

turnover and earnings in<br />

the last two years could<br />

be seen<br />

2001<br />

50,00 100,00 150,00 200,00 250,00 300,00 350,00<br />

Earnings in trade sector in Tbilisi in GEL<br />

<br />

Earnings in business sector in Tbilisi in GEL<br />

400,00<br />

350,00<br />

300,00<br />

250,00<br />

200,00<br />

150,00<br />

Earnings in business sector vs earnings<br />

in enterprises of trade, repair of vehicles,<br />

personal & household goods in Tbilisi<br />

2003<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

Salaries in the private<br />

sector of Tbilisi have<br />

been growing<br />

dynamically and so have<br />

the salaries in the trade<br />

sector. Both parameters<br />

grew significantly<br />

throughout the last year<br />

100,00<br />

50,00 100,00 150,00 200,00 250,00 300,00 350,00<br />

Earnings in trade sector in Tbilisi in GEL


6000,0<br />

5000,0<br />

4000,0<br />

3000,0<br />

2000,0<br />

Comparative analysis turnover (X axis - in<br />

mln GEL) and employment (Y axis) in<br />

Georgia and Tbilisi in in enterprises of<br />

trade, repair of vehicles, personal &<br />

2006<br />

household goods<br />

2006<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

Trade turnover in<br />

Georgia<br />

Trade employment<br />

in Georogia<br />

Trade turnover in<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Trade employment<br />

in Tbilisi<br />

On the collective<br />

chart presenting the<br />

rate of the turnover<br />

and employment<br />

growth in Tbilisi and<br />

in Georgia a<br />

significant reduction<br />

of employment in<br />

2006 can be seen,<br />

despite the rise in<br />

the turnover values.<br />

This trend is present<br />

not only in Tbilisi but<br />

also in the whole<br />

Georgian trade<br />

sector<br />

1000,0<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

0,0<br />

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000


Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />

4 000<br />

3 000<br />

2 000<br />

1 000<br />

Industry turnover in regions in 2006<br />

1 409<br />

100%<br />

75%<br />

50%<br />

25%<br />

Percent<br />

In the industry sector<br />

Tbilisi has a leading role<br />

in the regions of<br />

Georgia.<br />

Over 40% of revenue in<br />

the industry is generated<br />

in Tbilisi. One out of<br />

other regions of<br />

Georgia, i.e. Kvemo<br />

Kartli generate app.<br />

Over 20% of the<br />

turnover. The last 40%<br />

are generated by the<br />

remaining regions.<br />

785<br />

0<br />

276 237<br />

104 99 82 73 64 36 29 13<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Imereti<br />

Kakheti<br />

Adjara<br />

Abkhazja<br />

0%<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

Guria<br />

Kvemo Kartli<br />

<br />

Employment<br />

100 000<br />

80 000<br />

60 000<br />

40 000<br />

Industry employment in regions in 2006<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

Percent<br />

The employment in the<br />

industry is the highest in<br />

Tbilisi, and generates<br />

over 40% of industry<br />

employment in Georgia.<br />

Other leading in<br />

employment regions are<br />

Imereti and Kvemo Kartli<br />

and generates no more<br />

than 20% each.<br />

40%<br />

20 000<br />

35 137<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

Kvemo Kartli<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Abkhazja<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Tbilisi<br />

13 999 10 763<br />

5 630 4 813 4 543 3 042 1 892 1 821 1 215 880 497<br />

Imereti<br />

Adjara<br />

0%<br />

Kakheti<br />

Guria<br />

Racha Lekhumi


Industry turnover in Georgia in mln GEL<br />

3000,0<br />

2500,0<br />

2000,0<br />

1500,0<br />

Turnover in industry sector in Georgia<br />

and Tbilisi<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

In 2001-2006 a regular<br />

increase of industry<br />

turnover was observed<br />

both in Tbilisi and in the<br />

whole Georgia. In the<br />

years of 2005 and 2006<br />

the turnover values<br />

doubled in comparison<br />

to 2003.<br />

2001<br />

0,0 300,0 600,0 900,0 1200,0 1500,0<br />

Industry turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />

<br />

Industry turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />

1500,0<br />

1200,0<br />

900,0<br />

600,0<br />

300,0<br />

Turnover vs employment in industry<br />

sector in Tbilisi<br />

2003<br />

2002<br />

2004<br />

2001<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

When comparing the<br />

dynamics of the revenue<br />

and employment growth<br />

in the last six years<br />

despite further rise in<br />

turnover,<br />

the<br />

employment fell from<br />

2001-2003.<br />

Simultaneously to the<br />

2001-2006 turnover leap<br />

Tbilisi industry saw the<br />

increase in employment<br />

in years 2003-2006.<br />

2003 was the last year<br />

when employment levels<br />

fell values despite<br />

growing turnover.<br />

0,0<br />

26000 28000 30000 32000 34000 36000<br />

Industry employment in Tbilisi


Industry turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />

1500,0<br />

1200,0<br />

900,0<br />

600,0<br />

300,0<br />

Turnover vs earnings in industry sector<br />

in Tbilisi<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

A different situation can<br />

be observed when<br />

comparing the dynamics<br />

of turnover growth of<br />

turnover in the industry<br />

sector with rising<br />

salaries. In this case a<br />

dynamic increase of<br />

turnover and earnings<br />

could be seen.<br />

0,0<br />

100 150 200 250 300 350 400<br />

Earnings in industry sector in Tbilisi in<br />

GEL<br />

<br />

Earnings in business sector in Georgia in GEL<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

Earnings in business sector vs earnings in<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

YEARS<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

industry sector in Tbilisi When compared with<br />

2001 the salaries in the<br />

industry sector and<br />

2006<br />

private sector they more<br />

than<br />

tripled<br />

simultaneously. Both<br />

parameters grew<br />

significantly throughout<br />

the last year.<br />

In comparison to the<br />

private sector the<br />

earnings in the industry<br />

sector were growing at a<br />

faster rate.<br />

100<br />

100 150 200 250 300 350 400<br />

Earnings in industry sector in Tbilisi in GEL


3000,0<br />

2000,0<br />

1000,0<br />

Comparative analysis turnover (Y aixs - in<br />

mln GEL) and employment (X axis) in<br />

Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

2004<br />

20032002<br />

2005<br />

2001<br />

2006<br />

2006<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2002<br />

2001<br />

2005<br />

Industry turnover<br />

in Georgia<br />

Industry<br />

employment in<br />

Georogia<br />

Industry turnover<br />

in Tbilisi<br />

Industry<br />

employment in<br />

Tbilisi<br />

On the collective chart<br />

presenting the rate of<br />

the turnover and<br />

employment growth<br />

the rise in turnover<br />

and employment could<br />

be observed both in<br />

Tbilisi and throughout<br />

Georgia. In the last<br />

two years both<br />

parameters grew. In<br />

Georgia a significant<br />

reduction of<br />

employment in 2006<br />

can be seen but not in<br />

Tbilisi despite the rise<br />

in the turnover values<br />

in Tbilisi and Georgia<br />

in years 2001-2006.<br />

0,0<br />

20000 40000 60000 80000 100000<br />

Conclusions<br />

A thorough analysis of the tourist, construction, industry and trade clusters<br />

gives a clear picture of the situation and the processes that are taking place in<br />

the local economy of Tbilisi. The importance of the examined clusters can<br />

demonstrated by means of the following conclusions:<br />

- the examined clusters generate locally almost 80% of the national turnover<br />

in these clusters;<br />

- the employment in the examined clusters accounts for 50% - 80% of the<br />

total employment in Georgia;<br />

- a significant rise in the turnover volume (it almost doubled both nationally<br />

and in Tbilisi) is a common tendency for all the clusters, particularly in the<br />

observed period of 2004-2006;<br />

- due to the dynamic growth of the examined markets a change in the<br />

employment took place in each of them in the period of 2004-2006. The<br />

number of the jobs in the construction cluster almost doubled (not in the last<br />

year, though). After the period of falling figures since 2004 the industry cluster<br />

has been providing 10% more jobs annually and it is a cluster that generates<br />

the highest employment among the examined markets. Also the employment<br />

in the hotel industry has been growing since 2003 at a rate of 10% per year.<br />

The market of trade, repair of vehicles, personal and household goods, after a<br />

period of 2001 – 2005 when the employment was growing, has reduced its<br />

workforce below 25 000 people, i.e. to the level similar to 2003;<br />

- In each of the examined clusters the steady rise in salaries has been<br />

observed. The best paid jobs are in the construction cluster. The average pay<br />

in this cluster is 30% higher than in the whole Tbilisi business sector and its


salaries rose the most in the last examined years, i.e. 2005-2006. Another<br />

cluster where the salaries are higher than the business cluster average is the<br />

industry cluster where the significant rise in salaries – by about 50% - took<br />

place last year. The lowest salaries, not exceeding 220 GEL, were earned in<br />

the tourist cluster, although they did rise by 30% in the last examined year.<br />

Also, the pay level offered on this market in the three last examined years<br />

(2004-2006) was 30% lower than the salaries in the whole business cluster.<br />

The salaries in the trade, repair of vehicles, personal and household goods<br />

cluster grew considerably in the last examined year (2005-2006) and are<br />

comparable with the mean salary levels in the whole business sector. In the<br />

previous years the salaries rose gradually, but no more than by 10% yearly.<br />

- The comparative analysis of the turnover and employment in 2001-2006 in<br />

Tbilisi and Georgia demonstrates a strong correlation between the processes<br />

taking place on the examined markets in the Georgian national economy and<br />

in the economy of Tbilisi. The tendencies observed in Tbilisi have their<br />

reflection in the tendencies happening nationally, which is due mainly to the<br />

fact that Tbilisi economy in the area of the examined clusters accounts for<br />

over 50% of the national turnover and employment.<br />

The sector of strategic importance for the city economy is the banking sector.<br />

Although, when compared to other analysed industries, it does not generate<br />

many jobs, but it employs staff that is better qualified and better paid than<br />

other business sector employees. This is why a descriptive analysis of the<br />

banking sector in Georgia and Tbilisi has been carried out as well. In 1994 a<br />

reform of banking sector, introduction of a two-tier banking system (National<br />

Bank of Georgia and the commercial banks). 18 banks functioning in Georgia<br />

(March 2007), 13 of them are foreign controlled. Commercial bank’s total<br />

assets comprise 31% of GDP and liabilities comprise 24%. The perspectives<br />

of Georgia becoming the financial centre for the region are high but there are<br />

also significant challenges:<br />

Opportunities:<br />

- Azerbaijan growth – many forms of banking and insurance are impossible to<br />

introduce in the Arab countries. That is why investors from Muslim countries<br />

tend to locate their money in Christian countries’ financial institutions. It is a<br />

challenge for Georgia to attract capital from Muslim Azerbaijan which was the<br />

world’s fastest growing economy in 2006 with GDP real growth rate amounted<br />

to 32.5%.<br />

- Attractive location – Georgia is located in the centre of the Caucasus,<br />

bordering the Black Sea, between Turkey and Russia, there is no developed<br />

financial centre in this area<br />

- Professional support from western countries available – the example of<br />

Dubai shows that a country which is developing a big financial centre can use<br />

international help, especially in applying appropriate legal system and<br />

introducing special conditions for investors<br />

Challenges:<br />

- International standards requirements: transport links, transparent regulatory<br />

and legal systems, technological sophistication, a good quality of life for<br />

expatriate bankers, liquid capital markets, etc<br />

- Georgia still lacks internally adequate level of capital to finance large<br />

projects. Most local banks are unable to finance multimillion dollar projects.<br />

On the other hand, foreign banks are unfamiliar with their country and might<br />

be reluctant or too expensive to finance local projects. Regional banking<br />

would create a larger pool of capital to finance internal projects in Georgia.


It is of key importance for the city development to attract capital in the<br />

following areas. In order to improve the conditions of business activity and the<br />

quality of life it is most important to invest in technical infrastructure:<br />

• transport infrastructure,<br />

• telecommunication infrastructure,<br />

• utilities.<br />

In order to improve competitiveness of the economy the following investments<br />

in institutional infrastructure are necessary:<br />

• institutions facilitating access to funding,<br />

• institutions of labour market and workforce development,<br />

• institutions giving SME access to technical assistance (TA),<br />

• networking and marketing organisations,<br />

• know- how and technology transfer institutions,<br />

• space for work with service provided.<br />

To set up new firms and attract investors business space is necessary:<br />

• offices,<br />

• shops,<br />

• warehouses,<br />

• industrial units,<br />

• hotels and restaurants,<br />

• plots of land with infrastructure,<br />

• houses and apartments.<br />

The city can stimulate investment in these three areas in many ways. Some of<br />

these investments belong to the private sector, others will remain public<br />

investments. Part of the investments will be done by national investors, while<br />

another part of the capital will come from international markets.<br />

For the last twenty years we have been observing changes happening in the<br />

cities of Central and East Europe which have abandoned centrally planned<br />

economy and are joining global cooperation and competition. In the recent<br />

years in Georgia strategic investments in technical infrastructure have been<br />

done with both public and private money. Many international donors have<br />

started programmes building institutional infrastructure for the new economy.<br />

We can observe a boom on Tbilisi real estate market where, apart from<br />

housing estates, new office and shopping space has been built. New hotels,<br />

restaurants as well as factories and warehouses are being constructed as<br />

well. Some of the old industrial buildings in the inner city after renovation have<br />

been converted into moderate class offices and shops.


Progressing economic reform and further political stabilisation will help Tbilisi<br />

go through the process of economic change, similar to the one experienced<br />

by the cities of East Europe. Since Georgia has joined the global economy<br />

and the skilled workforce resources in CEE have been running out, soon new<br />

investors will get interested in Caucasus and Tbilisi.<br />

Presently, Tbilisi sees processes typical for the second phase of economy<br />

transformation described above. In the following years we will still witness<br />

growing share of private investments in such areas as telecommunications,<br />

transport, logistics, trade, hotels and restaurants, offices, light industries and<br />

confection , media and entertainment.<br />

Due to these investments the city economy will gain capital, new<br />

organisational standards of production, management, staff skills as well as<br />

new jobs and the awareness of international markets. Another direct benefit<br />

for Tbilisi will be the increase of revenues from personal income tax (PIT), all<br />

of which is the city budget revenue.<br />

The mechanism of financing local government by the money coming from the<br />

personal income tax makes the city more interested in participating in local<br />

economic development.<br />

New jobs, higher salaries, registering firms from the informal sector directly<br />

affects the city budget. The share of 2003-2006 PIT revenue in this budget<br />

proves how important it is for the city.<br />

<br />

Year Total city budget revenues PIT<br />

2006 466,9539 256,8945<br />

2005 412,3000 189,7347<br />

2004 328,744 159,357<br />

2003 205,3 75,939<br />

The table shows that two thirds of the city budget increase resulted from the<br />

growth of Personal income Tax paid by its residents. It means that city<br />

development strategies should be oriented for stimulation of high quality and<br />

good paid work places. Situation in Central and Eastern Europe shows that<br />

foreign investors and local companies are competing more and more for high<br />

skilled workers with good work attitude. Of course business environment,<br />

coast of running business and size of market, as well as provided<br />

infrastructure is still important but skilled workforce became to be more and<br />

more crucial factor.<br />

Summarising long term strategy should be oriented on new sectors that will :<br />

• create products and services that are competitive on global markets,<br />

• generate locally high added value,<br />

• create high quality jobs.


One of the elements of the process of writing the Local Development Plan for<br />

Tbilisi was the survey of two groups of beneficiaries – tourist and innovation<br />

companies. Such choice of the groups was determined by the outcomes of<br />

analyses of Tbilisi potential clusters. As a result the consultants identified<br />

seven potential clusters, out of which the tourism and creative clusters<br />

received the highest marks. The aim of the survey was to examine the<br />

barriers restricting the economic growth in the sectors (clusters) and identify<br />

the way public partners can support development of both sectors.<br />

<br />

As far as the employment volume in the surveyed companies is concerned<br />

two groups dominate – the ones with up to employees – 34% and the firms<br />

with 5-20 employees – 33 %. Companies employing 10-100 people account<br />

for 18%, and 15% are the companies with 100 and more workers.<br />

<br />

Employees in companies<br />

15%<br />

34%<br />

18%<br />

less than 5<br />

5 to 20<br />

20 to 100<br />

100 and more<br />

33%


Over one third of the firms declare annual income of 50,000-500,000 Lari.<br />

29% are the firms with income of 5,000-50,000 Lari. 18% share in the market<br />

have two groups of firms: the ones with income lower than 5,000 Lari and<br />

over 500,000 Lari. Vast majority of businesses (67%) whose income exceeds<br />

500,000 Lari are the companies employing over 100 workers.<br />

<br />

Company incomes in 2006<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

less than 5<br />

employees<br />

5 to 20 employees<br />

20 to 100<br />

employees<br />

100 and more<br />

employees<br />

Together<br />

less than 5000 GEL 54% 0% 0% 0% 18%<br />

5000-50000 GEL 31% 42% 14% 17% 29%<br />

50000-500000 GEL 15% 58% 43% 17% 34%<br />

More than 500000 GEL 0% 0% 43% 67% 18%<br />

Most of the surveyed companies (60%) have existed on the market for over 3<br />

years. 30% are the firms 1-3 years old. There are no companies who have<br />

been operating on the market for over 10 years. New companies account for<br />

4% of the examined population.<br />

Most of the companies (92%) have permanent access to the Internet. 65% of<br />

companies have declared that they have their web site.<br />

When asked about their opinion about the industry they are operating in 44%<br />

of companies reckon that their market will grow rapidly, 33% think that the<br />

market will grow slowly, while 15% are of the opinion that it will remain stable.<br />

Only 3% of companies predict that the market will be gradually shrinking. 5%<br />

have no opinion in this matter. None of the companies think that the market<br />

will decrease rapidly.<br />

Half of the surveyed firms react to new opportunities emerging on the market,<br />

20% of them have developed a formally adopted development plan for the<br />

next three years and have already been implementing it, 25% do not have<br />

any formal development plan document, but they have actually been<br />

implementing it. Only 5% of the surveyed businesses operate without any<br />

development plan for the next three years.


Companies opinion about their industry<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

less than 5<br />

employee<br />

5 to 20<br />

employee<br />

20 to 100<br />

employee<br />

100 and more<br />

employee<br />

Together<br />

High grow th of market 43% 31% 57% 67% 45%<br />

Slow grow th of market 43% 23% 29% 33% 33%<br />

Market w ill be stable 7% 31% 14% 0% 15%<br />

Slow decrease of market 0% 8% 0% 0% 3%<br />

High decrease of market 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />

No opinion 7% 8% 0% 0% 5%<br />

In case of 40% of companies high quality of products is an indicator of their<br />

competitiveness on the market. Another factor is the high quality of services,<br />

as it has been pointed out by 20% of businesses. Good brand is an important<br />

competitiveness factor for 18% of firms, attractive price – for 10%. 5% of<br />

businesses have no competition on the market, while 8% are not able to<br />

define the competitiveness of their product or service on their market.<br />

<br />

Competitiveness of the products<br />

6<br />

no opinion<br />

5<br />

high quality of service<br />

4<br />

3<br />

price<br />

high quality of products<br />

2<br />

1<br />

lack of other<br />

competitors on the<br />

market<br />

our products has good<br />

reputation<br />

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%<br />

Great majority of firms (60%) intend to introduce next year new<br />

products/services onto the market.


The surveyed companies claim that their main competitors are Tbilisi-based<br />

(92% od firms), while the remaining 8% regard as rivals companies from other<br />

parts of Georgia. The examined businesses do not recognise companies<br />

operating in foreign countries as their competition.<br />

35% of companies function on the market as a single entity, 25% cooperate<br />

with a larger foreign company, 15% cooperate with a larger Georgian<br />

company, while 25% cooperates with other similar firms based in Tbilisi.<br />

When assessing their environment the companies most often point out difficult<br />

access to investment and current spending funding. The companies express<br />

a good opinion about the access to transport links, telecommunication, the<br />

accessibility and quality of market services as well as about the access to high<br />

quality office and production facilities and space. They are also satisfied with<br />

the accessibility of new manufacturing technologies. 46% of them, however,<br />

are critical about administrative regulations that do not support business<br />

effectiveness. Almost 40% of companies indicated that the poor availability of<br />

skilled workforce is also a serious obstacle for companies to grow.<br />

<br />

Does the company have access to<br />

funds for investments?<br />

Does the company have access to<br />

funds for current spending?<br />

Is good quality office and<br />

production space available?<br />

Does the company have access to<br />

new technologies in production?<br />

Does the company have access to<br />

new technologies in organization<br />

and managing?<br />

Is there an easy access to skilled<br />

workforce?<br />

Does the company have access to<br />

technical support ?<br />

Is it possible to cluster activities in<br />

the market?<br />

Do the clients and the market have<br />

easy access to transportation links?<br />

Is telecommunication system easily<br />

accessible?<br />

Are market services easily<br />

accessible and of good quality?<br />

Do legal and administrative<br />

regulations support the<br />

effectiveness of businesses?<br />

Very good<br />

access<br />

conditions<br />

Good<br />

access<br />

conditions<br />

Problems<br />

with<br />

access<br />

Serious<br />

problems<br />

with access<br />

1% 9% 64% 26%<br />

2% 16% 73% 8%<br />

3% 47% 37% 13%<br />

5% 43% 29% 22%<br />

8% 34% 48% 9%<br />

1% 23% 40% 36%<br />

9% 28% 42% 22%<br />

2% 38% 39% 20%<br />

8% 48% 34% 9%<br />

16% 58% 16% 11%<br />

2% 42% 36% 20%<br />

1% 25% 29% 46%


Last year almost half of the surveyed companies observed an over 20%<br />

increase in sales and employment, while more than a half of them did not see<br />

any changes in export, investments and new marketing areas.<br />

<br />

Decrease<br />

over 20%<br />

Decrease<br />

below 20%<br />

No change<br />

Increase<br />

below 20%<br />

Increase<br />

over 20%<br />

In sales 1% 6% 18% 27% 48%<br />

In employment 1% 1% 31% 19% 48%<br />

In revenues 1% 4% 17% 36% 42%<br />

In export 1% 11% 53% 0% 34%<br />

In investments 3% 5% 58% 21% 13%<br />

In new marketing<br />

areas 1% 2% 52% 24% 22%<br />

In 2007 most of the companies declare increasing economic indicators,<br />

particularly in new marketing areas, employment, incomes and sales.<br />

<br />

Decrease<br />

over 20%<br />

Decrease<br />

below 20%<br />

No change<br />

Increase<br />

below 20%<br />

Increase<br />

over 20%<br />

In sales 0% 4% 11% 22% 64%<br />

In employment 0% 0% 23% 23% 54%<br />

In revenues 1% 4% 11% 28% 57%<br />

In export 1% 0% 39% 22% 38%<br />

In investments 1% 2% 23% 35% 39%<br />

In new marketing<br />

areas 1% 1% 24% 17% 57%<br />

86% of firms predicts strengthening their share in he market in the next two<br />

years.<br />

Moreover, the surveyed businesses pointed out the priority areas that require<br />

improvement and support of public institutions. It turns out that the companies<br />

first of all need: a guarantee fund (44 points in the ranking), vocational<br />

training courses for employees (38 points), better access to office space with<br />

service provided (28 points) and more training courses for managers (28<br />

points). On the fifth position the companies have placed a microcredit fund (27<br />

points).


Score<br />

Establishing a guarantee fund 44<br />

Training courses for employees 38<br />

More office space with service (e.g. for new set-ups) 28<br />

Managerial training courses 28<br />

Establishing microcredit funds 27<br />

Access to consulting services concerning new<br />

products/services creation<br />

13<br />

Support in entering new markets and export areas 12<br />

Support in implementing and applying new technologies 12<br />

Promotion of companies abroad 11<br />

Establishing a venture capital 8<br />

Electronic platform for new set-ups with e-business software 4<br />

Conclusions:<br />

• The surveyed creative cluster companies are relatively young, but<br />

having market experience, of very high growth dynamics in sales,<br />

employment, export and finding new marketing areas.<br />

• The companies remain competitive on the market mainly due to high<br />

quality of their products or services, which may be a result of<br />

cooperation with large foreign and domestic companies.<br />

• As their main competitors the companies identify other Tbilisi-based<br />

businesses. In a longer perspective they should take into<br />

consideration growing business activity of foreign companies and start<br />

preparing themselves for new competition by establishing an<br />

economic cluster.<br />

• The companies complain about the inaccessible investment and<br />

operational funding as the barrier hindering their growth. Another<br />

problem is a short supply of skilled workforce , which supports our<br />

recommendation for developing the education cluster in order to offer<br />

more training for line workers and managers.<br />

• In the entrepreneurs’ opinion current legal regulations should be<br />

modified so that local businesses could improve their effectiveness.<br />

• As priority areas the companies have chosen: guarantee and<br />

microcredit funds and vocational and managerial training packets.<br />

• Although the companies are satisfied with the access to existing office<br />

and production space, they point out, as another priority area, that it is<br />

necessary to enlarge this space, especially for newly established<br />

companies.


Most companies operating in the tourism cluster employ 5-20 people. In the<br />

surveyed group no company employs over 100 workers.<br />

<br />

Employees in companies<br />

16% - 20 to 100<br />

employee<br />

15% - less than 5<br />

employe<br />

less than 5 employees<br />

5 to 20 employees<br />

20 to 100 employees<br />

69% - 5 to 20<br />

employee<br />

Over half of the surveyed firms declares annual income of 5,000-50,000 Lari.<br />

Two groups of companies account for 20% share of the market each – the<br />

ones earning less than 5,000 Lari and 50,000-500,000 Lari. 8% of firms<br />

declare over 500,000 of annual income. As far as th employment is<br />

concerned, companies hiring less than 5 people declare income up to 50,000<br />

Lari. In case of companies employing 20 to 100 workers their incomes is<br />

evenly distributed into three groups.<br />

<br />

Company incomes in 2006 in tourism sector<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

less than 5<br />

employees<br />

5 to 20 employeeS<br />

20 to 100<br />

employees<br />

Total<br />

less than 5000 GEL 50% 13% 0% 20%<br />

5000-50000 GEL 50% 56% 33% 52%<br />

50000-500000 GEL 0% 25% 33% 20%<br />

More than 500000 GEL 0% 6% 33% 8%


Tourist companies have substantial market experience. Only 10% of them are<br />

younger than 3 years. Over the half of companies on this market have been in<br />

business for 3-10 years. 18% of the businesses are more than 10 years old.<br />

All the surveyed companies have a permanent access to the Internet and<br />

most of them have their own web page. Yet, 8% of them do not have their<br />

own web site.<br />

Great majority of the tourist firms predicts their market will be growing. 65% of<br />

them think it will be growing slowly, while 35% expects it to increase rapidly.<br />

9% of the companies have no opinion about the development perspectives for<br />

the tourism market in Tbilisi.<br />

<br />

Opinion about perspectives of tourism sector<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

less than 5 employees 5 to 20 employees 20 to 100 employees Together<br />

High grow th of market 45% 28% 50% 35%<br />

Slow grow th of market 45% 72% 50% 63%<br />

Market w ill be stable 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />

Slow decrease of market 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />

High decrease of market 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />

No opinion 9% 0% 0% 9%<br />

36% of companies operate according to company development strategy they<br />

have adopted. 26% follows the strategy but in an informalised way, while<br />

33% simply react to the opportunities arising on the market. 5% of companies<br />

have not developed any business strategy.<br />

According to 63% of companies, competitiveness is mainly based on the<br />

quality of offered products. Reputation and customer service are less<br />

important for the company competitiveness.<br />

<br />

Competitiveness of the products<br />

5<br />

high quality of<br />

service<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

price<br />

our products has<br />

good reputation<br />

lack of other<br />

competitors on the<br />

market<br />

high quality of<br />

products<br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%


Next year 82% of the surveyed companies intend to introduce a new product<br />

or service on the market.<br />

Most of the companies (94%) claim that their competitors are Tbilisi-based<br />

firms. The remaining 6% sees their competition in other parts of Georgia or<br />

abroad.<br />

When evaluating the environment of the tourism market the companies<br />

expressed their opinion that there was a good access to tourist offers in Tbilisi,<br />

to cooperation with tourist market regulators and to modern information<br />

technology. They indicated difficulties in accessing tourist infrastructure,<br />

specialist health tourism offers and tourist information system. Another serious<br />

problem hindering the industry development is, first of all, inefficient<br />

transportation system followed by the quality of skilled workforce and the lack<br />

of specialist offers dealing with training and education tourism as well as with<br />

health tourism.<br />

<br />

Very good<br />

access<br />

conditions<br />

Good<br />

access<br />

conditions<br />

Problems<br />

with<br />

access<br />

Serious<br />

problems<br />

with access<br />

Tbilisi tourist products offer 3% 74% 10% 13%<br />

Tbilisi tourism marketing 3% 41% 38% 18%<br />

Tourism information system 8% 38% 40% 15%<br />

Access to Tbilisi from abroad 13% 38% 35% 15%<br />

Inland country transportation 5% 46% 18% 31%<br />

Transportation system 3% 47% 16% 34%<br />

Sightseeing paths 3% 46% 28% 23%<br />

Quality of accommodation<br />

services 8% 42% 29% 21%<br />

State of tourist infrastructure 3% 26% 44% 28%<br />

Skilled workforce 10% 30% 30% 30%<br />

Language skills of workforce and<br />

community 10% 31% 36% 23%<br />

Security problem 8% 46% 23% 23%<br />

Calendar of events 8% 43% 35% 14%<br />

Cooperation with domestic tourist<br />

destinations 5% 53% 25% 18%<br />

Specialized Tbilisi tourist product<br />

offers - business tourism 5% 51% 32% 11%<br />

Specialized Tbilisi tourist product<br />

offers – education and training<br />

tourism 5% 24% 39% 32%<br />

Specialized Tbilisi tourist product<br />

offers – spa and health tourism 5% 21% 44% 31%<br />

Specialized Tbilisi tourist product<br />

offers – youth tourism 5% 31% 38% 26%<br />

Specialized Tbilisi tourist product<br />

offers –heritage tourism 20% 43% 25% 13%<br />

Access to IT technologies 8% 51% 28% 13%


Most of the surveyed firms did not observe any changes in last year’s<br />

economic parameters. 37% of firms observed over 20% increase in sales,<br />

25% - in employment and 33% - in income.<br />

<br />

Decrease<br />

over 20%<br />

Decrease<br />

below 20%<br />

No change<br />

Increase<br />

below 20%<br />

Increase<br />

over 20%<br />

In sales 3% 3% 31% 26% 37%<br />

In employment 3% 0% 56% 17% 25%<br />

In revenues 3% 3% 39% 22% 33%<br />

In export 5% 5% 64% 14% 14%<br />

In investments 4% 4% 63% 11% 19%<br />

In new marketing<br />

areas 3% 0% 77% 7% 13%<br />

Great majority of the surveyed firms intends to improve their economic<br />

outcome in 2007. 60% of companies are planning to increase their sales by<br />

over 20%, half of them intends to increase employment, investments or<br />

market share by over 20%. None of the companies expects their economic<br />

parameters to fall this year.<br />

<br />

Decrease<br />

over 20%<br />

Decrease<br />

below 20%<br />

No change<br />

Increase<br />

below 20%<br />

Increase<br />

over 20%<br />

In sales 0% 0% 18% 23% 60%<br />

In employment 0% 0% 28% 21% 51%<br />

In revenues 0% 0% 20% 20% 60%<br />

In export 0% 0% 35% 19% 46%<br />

In investments 0% 0% 31% 13% 56%<br />

In new marketing<br />

areas 0% 0% 30% 18% 52%<br />

The surveyed businesses pointed out the priority areas that required<br />

improvement and support of public institutions. These areas include building<br />

new sightseeing paths, access to Tbilisi from abroad, improvement of tourist<br />

infrastructure and tourist information system.


Score<br />

Sightseeing paths 27<br />

Access to Tbilisi from abroad 26<br />

State of tourist infrastructure 26<br />

Tourism information system 25<br />

Tbilisi tourist products 24<br />

Tbilisi tourism marketing 22<br />

Inland country transportation 14<br />

Quality of accommodation services 14<br />

Transportation system 13<br />

Skilled workforce 10<br />

Security problem 10<br />

Specialized Tbilisi tourist product offers - education and training<br />

tourism 4<br />

Cooperation with domestic tourist destinations 3<br />

Calendar of events 2<br />

Specialized Tbilisi tourist product offers - spa and health tourism 2<br />

Specialized Tbilisi tourist product offers - youth tourism 2<br />

Access to IT technologies 2<br />

Specialized Tbilisi tourist product offers - business tourism 1<br />

Specialized Tbilisi tourist product offers - heritage tourism 1<br />

Language skills of workforce and community 0<br />

Conclusions:<br />

• The tourism cluster companies have substantial market experience,<br />

precisely defined development plans and employ 5-20 workers.<br />

• They treat the Internet access and own web page as a working tool<br />

and a way to present their business offer.<br />

• The companies compete on the market mainly by means of high<br />

quality products and services. Next year they are going to increase<br />

their offer with new products and services.<br />

• Their competition are first of all local businesses operating in Tbilisi in<br />

the same industry. The companies are not afraid of the competition<br />

from other parts of Georgia and from abroad.<br />

• They consider a barrier for the industry development such areas as:<br />

the quality of tourist infrastructure, the non-existent tourist information<br />

system and the lack of specialist tourist offers (mainly the health<br />

tourism offer).<br />

• According to the surveyed firms, another serious problem for the<br />

industry development is the transportation system in Tbilisi, the quality<br />

of the skilled workforce and the lack of specialist offer for education<br />

and training tourism as well as for health tourism.<br />

• In the companies’ opinion the market will be systematically growing<br />

and generating new jobs.<br />

• As priority areas requiring intervention of public institutions the<br />

surveyed companies pointed out the need to build sightseeing paths,<br />

better access to Tbilisi from abroad, improved tourist infrastructure<br />

and more effective tourist information system.


Contemporary territorial structure of Tbilisi was formed in the process of city<br />

historical development as a result of internal and external factors impact. This<br />

process consists of several emphatic chronological stages.<br />

Feudal age (from recognition of Tbilisi as a capital city to the end of the XVIII<br />

century). The city is developed on both embankments of the river Mtkvari, in<br />

the limited territorial conditions – basically, within the city fence. In the end of<br />

this period can be observed the trend of moving out of the fence in the mode<br />

of external district.<br />

Period of Russian empire (1801-1917) - The city self-defensive surrounding is<br />

losing significance, Tbilisi first invades in higher Plato of the right embankment<br />

of the river Mtkvari; on the left embankment German colony is established;<br />

later occurs its and outskirt countries incorporation into Tbilisi administrative<br />

boarders. The city acquires the trend of linear development, basically in the<br />

upper direction of the river Mtkvari. Coexistence of ancient “Asian” and<br />

modern “European” parts is formed like metaphoric description of “doubleface<br />

Ianus”.<br />

Short term existence of Georgian democratic republic (1918-1921) added<br />

nothing to Tbilisi in terms of territorial development.<br />

Soviet period (1921-1991) was marked with emphatic increase of capital<br />

population and its territory. All parameters of the city development were<br />

regulated by General plans; In the Soviet period, since 1934, 3 general plans<br />

had been adopted; The calculating period of the last of which was accounted<br />

till 2000. According to the general plan, residential massifs, industrial-storage<br />

zones are created in the peripheries, social-cultural and storage-technical<br />

infrastructure are developed; For the first time, attention is paid to the urban<br />

heritage; also considerable attention is paid to the city green plants and<br />

suburban recreational zones.<br />

Period of Independence (1991- till now). In recent years the city has been<br />

developing on behalf of the internal territorial resources, often, contradictional<br />

to the emerged building process and without taking into consideration<br />

interests of the residents. Under the conditions of reducing Tbilisi population<br />

number and beginning suburbanization, in the end of 2006 emphatic<br />

expansion of the capital administrative boarders (recently created Didgori<br />

region) and separating of the “Old Tbilisi” administrative raegion acquires a<br />

new space to the capital urban problem. This challenge should be answered<br />

by the announced contest of the 3rd April of 2007 on composing “general<br />

plan of Tbilisi land use”.


Such immanent feature of Tbilisi spatial development as linear was naturally<br />

reflected in the configuration of its center. Logical Urban researches held yet<br />

in the Soviet period, proved that entire city center of Tbilisi is developing linear<br />

along the river Mtkvari gorge. Localization of city forming objects and mental<br />

maps of Tbilisi residents make this fact evident. Thus, Tbilisi was exposing the<br />

trend of natural development of the long center, in the widths direction of city<br />

center in the general plan, resisting the voluntary approach of turning to the<br />

Tbilisi sea.<br />

Central structures expose general trends of development upper of the river<br />

Mtkvari; Although lately, the desire of allocating city forming objects within “Old<br />

Tbilisi” and in the direction of the flow of Mtkvari has been emphasizing. Thus,<br />

Tbilisi common city center territorially expands from the Freedom square in<br />

two directions.<br />

First and basic, on the right embankment of the river Mtkvari implies Rustaveli<br />

Avenue, acquires several branches at the Philharmonic buildings in the<br />

direction of Merab Kostava and Melikishvili streets, moving into the Ilia<br />

Chavchavadze Avenue, Konstantine Gamsakhurdia street and Vazha-<br />

Phshavela Avenue. Simultaneously center forming functions of David the<br />

builder and Akaki Tsereteli Avenues are being developed.<br />

The second direction of the city develops from the Freedom Square including<br />

the old city and, then in the directions of Avlabari-Isani and Ortachala with<br />

linear branches.<br />

Thus, the features of the Tbilisi common city center are:<br />

• Linear and dynamic character;<br />

• Expansion of the linear structures on behalf of the streets;<br />

• Poor widthy functional-planning links between the parallel central<br />

axises;<br />

• Increasingly emphasized importance of the old city;<br />

• Dispersive development of the city forming objects.<br />

Such features of the Tbilisi center makes difficult identification of the center<br />

core.<br />

More simple is pointing out the transit and commercial corridors. Tbilisi located<br />

in the TRACECA corridor is forced to let pass international cargo flows via its<br />

embankment, because of the damaged condition of the Tbilisi sea beyond<br />

road. These embankments, essentially, are the only draught highways on the<br />

whole territory of Tbilisi. For now the issue on cutting Kakheti highway till<br />

Avchala is being worked out, what will immensely unload the city center.<br />

Coming out of the specific location of the Tbilisi relief (differences between<br />

the heights of the river Mtkvari shores) widthy links are more complicated. The<br />

railway line within the city creates the same problem; overcoming of the<br />

railway line for the aboveground transport is possible only in two places, with<br />

making distance of 5 kilometers between them. Implementation of viaduct in<br />

the direction of Didube-Nadzaladevi accounted in general plan is far from<br />

realizing.


Coming out of the linear configuration of the territorial structure, large<br />

residential districts, basically, were constructed in the North and North-West,<br />

also in the South-East parts of the city. Their construction was performed on<br />

the precious agricultural lands, what was natural in Soviet period in the<br />

conditions of extensive assimilating of the city territories.<br />

As a result of expansion of Tbilisi territory in 2006 the capital city assimilated<br />

part of the Mtskheta and Gardabani districts. Consequently, the diversified<br />

problem of functioning of the country like residential areas in the joined part<br />

has become very actual. Social-cultural and engineering-technical<br />

rehabilitation or amenities will significantly increase the volume of Tbilisi<br />

housing fund, will improve its quality and become the fundament of<br />

broadening the base of city revenues.<br />

The conditions of the development of the capital, also must be discussed<br />

within the Tbilisi agglomeration, which implies significant part of Mtskheta,<br />

Gardabani regions, cities of Tbilisi and Rustavi. Relevant problem must be<br />

analyzed on the level of regional planning, taking into consideration basic<br />

trends of reorganization of the country territorial arrangement and urbanization<br />

in future.<br />

<br />

<br />

New stage of Tbilisi functional-spatial development begins with reestablishment<br />

of Georgia independence (1991). But, the face of contemporary<br />

capital was essentially affected by the last period of communistic regime.<br />

At that time, in order to facilitate the political tension in September of 1987 by<br />

the directive bodies of Soviet Georgia was adopted document, which<br />

practically was the first one, that admitted some construction initiative from the<br />

side of population. The enforcement of the document was stimulated by the<br />

tragic events of 9 April of 1989; In several weeks was issued decree by Tbilisi<br />

city council executive committee, which gave permissions to the residents of<br />

the state housing fund to lead the additional building of balconies, verandas<br />

and other supporting receptacles by their financial means, following particular<br />

technical conditions. Tbilisi was covered by ugly, often unsecured additional<br />

buildings, which acquired more and more ugly look to the unsuccessful<br />

without it blocks of mass building.<br />

Little early, were taken first steps in the direction of making land accessible for<br />

the city residents, outside the city giving kitchen gardens and country houses<br />

in the form of cooperatives. In this new emerged areas land and house<br />

volumes were severely defined by norms. City residents who desired to have<br />

own land and individual houses immediately started construction; Tbilisi<br />

outskirt territory in the radius of 30-40 km immediately was covered by country<br />

like residential areas, that are now in the various stages of finish.<br />

After coming in the power in 1991 the government of Zviad Gamsakhurdia<br />

was treating with relevant care privatization issue of the real estate – city lands<br />

including housing fund.


Law project on “privatization of housing” published in September of the same<br />

year, basically was responding to the international practice, mainly, because<br />

of working out of the housing reform economic aspects and was giving hope<br />

for successful urban management under the modern social-economic<br />

conditions.<br />

But at the edge of 1991-1992 as a result of the state overturn the direction<br />

was taken on unaccounted, populist solutions. Yet on the 1st February of<br />

1992 decree of the ministers’ cabinet of the republic of Georgia #107 on “<br />

privatization of housing (giving for free) in the republic of Georgia”. it was<br />

underlined in the document, that “the objects of privatization maybe house<br />

(flat) of state and public fund, among them damaged, reconstructional or<br />

uninhabited flat in the house, that required capital repair. In the document<br />

insufficiently was worked out organizational forms of multi-flat houses and<br />

financial-economic mechanisms. With one hand wave in Georgia was created<br />

new multi number class of real estate proprietors, who immediately made<br />

familiar with their rights, without having any imagination on proprietors duties.<br />

Thus, for “homo soveficus” the psychology of common dependant was not<br />

only eliminated, but was even enhanced in terms of requirement of the “new<br />

proprietors” from government to lead the repairment activities in really<br />

damaged houses.<br />

The results of the 25 April earthquake in 2002 emphasized the complaints of<br />

the poor proprietors of the damages houses in the direction of government.<br />

Simultaneously with the lack of care rapid degradation of housing fund, in one<br />

trace with political and economic stabilization, commercial housing<br />

construction began development; social (municipal, public) housing fund was<br />

not being built in Tbilisi even till nowadays – despite the necessity, societal<br />

requirements and international recommendations.<br />

Explosion of commercial housing construction naturally emphasized its<br />

territorial development issue. Distribution of lands according to the group and<br />

private interests was followed by the deliberated discrimination of the last<br />

Soviet Tbilisi reconstruction and by development of the general plan,<br />

accounted on 2000. Assimilating and using of the city lands’ scheme was<br />

activated reflecting the corruptive or group interests. According to the<br />

evaluation of international organizations, at that time , by the volume of<br />

bribing, issuance of construction permissions was on the second place in<br />

rating after the bribery rate in police.<br />

Commercial housing construction mainly was intending to concentrate on<br />

historically formed, most prestigious districts such as Vake, Vera, Mtatsminda.<br />

Prestige category, characteristic for Georgian culture, and which finally, is<br />

reflected in the prices of real estate, acquired commercial meaning and was<br />

also reflected in some normative acts. New multi-storied houses were often<br />

built without accounting accurate city constructive situation, sanitary-hygienic<br />

or housing norms, despite the protests of residents. Today its already evident,<br />

that such tightening of building in prestigious districts caused ecological<br />

problems, surplus of individual transport, overloading of social-cultural and<br />

engineering-technical infrastructure, and finally, decline of urban environment<br />

quality.<br />

Most grave situation was created in Old Tbilisi, which acquired remarkable<br />

monument defensive status yet in the Soviet period. Scandal housing<br />

construction in the defensive zones led to the fact, that Tbilisi application in<br />

2002 on inclusion in the UNESCO list of world heritage, was delayed till<br />

legislative, institutional and in terms of practical improvement of the situation.


In recent years in the sector of housing construction developer activities<br />

acquired more civilized look. This is maintained both by the initiatives of<br />

Georgian ministry of culture, monument defense and sport and by the<br />

corporative refinement of developers itself (emerging the developers<br />

association, adopting the appropriate ethics code, etc. ). It is worth to mention,<br />

that developer activities is expanding in terms of territory and it is moving to<br />

the regions near to the center (Saburtalo); and recently to the regions, early<br />

considered not to be prestigious.<br />

In the terms of above, best example is Avlabari district, which despite its<br />

features (central position, good micro-climate, transport infrastructure, best<br />

view and exposition to the various parts of the country), was unevenly<br />

positioned on the lower place in the classification of prestige districts. First one<br />

who paid attention to the city constructive potential of Avlabari was great<br />

friend of Tbilisi, scientist, architect from Hamburg Iost Schram, according to<br />

who’s initiative in 1997 in the architectural institute of Georgian central<br />

university began implementation of student project on renewing external area<br />

of Avlabari. Simultaneously, in Avlabari was being implemented such city<br />

forming activities, as construction of the Saint Trinity Cathedral and office of<br />

the President of Georgia. All above mentioned increased the district prestige<br />

and relatively price on the land.<br />

Some developers take even more accurate steps and directs its interests to<br />

yet non-prestigious territories. As an instance of this must serve start-up<br />

project called “Ortachalis Turfa” implemented by the “Arci” company in the<br />

south-East part of the city, and which attracts buyers with relatively low prices<br />

and complexity of building (with the components of social infrastructure).<br />

But, in terms of territorial attractiveness, traditional priority is on the side of<br />

housing construction at the edge of Tbilisi North and North-West (Bagebi, Didi<br />

Digomi), where important territorial resources and using of former agricultural<br />

lands made possible to create homestead building. Besides the best microclimate<br />

conditions, prestige of this zone was also encouraged by the<br />

construction of the new Embassy of the USA.<br />

Developers territorial preference naturally, is mainly defined by the priorities of<br />

potential consumers. From this side, it’s very essential, that if early together<br />

with prestige crucial importance was given to the prestige of accommodation<br />

location and quantitative parameters (number of rooms, space), recently has<br />

been observed emphasize of esthetic (“fine view”, “nice architecture”) and<br />

ecological (“fresh air”, “greenery”)requirements.<br />

The latest situation, together with general trend, states on a new position<br />

destiny of country like residential areas in the Tbilisi surroundings existed yet<br />

in the end of Soviet Period. Their engineering technical and social<br />

rehabilitation will positively influence general structure of Tbilisi housing fund<br />

and will be economically useful for the city. This topic deserves deeper<br />

attention and more than that implementation of political projects.<br />

In this direction really supporting factor is expansion of Tbilisi administrative<br />

boarders in the end of 2006 on behalf of the hinterland and summer-cottage<br />

zone. on the meeting of the 30th march of 2007 Tbilisi city council (Sakrebulo)<br />

approved enhanced new fiscal zoning of Tbilisi, which will support developer<br />

activities in the newly joined territories and thus, expansion of the<br />

suburbanization process. It is important, that some companies have already<br />

taken advanced steps for construction of the residential community. For


example, construction of “Tsavkisis Valley” by one of the Georgian-Jewish<br />

company.<br />

On the background of commercial housing construction, for balancing the<br />

structure of Tbilisi housing fund, emergent task is creation of so-called “social”<br />

(“municipal”, “public” ) accommodation. AS it was mentioned, the decree of<br />

1st February of 1992, practically, transformed almost whole housing fund of<br />

the city into the private property. Government still resists the creation of social<br />

accommodation, what strains the social climate in the society of Tbilisi.<br />

<br />

Moving into the new social-economic conditions caused dramatic changes of<br />

office and commercial objects allocation terms in the city planning structure.<br />

Large state establishment organizations of the Soviet period used to occupy<br />

large scale, often specially constructed buildings. Cultural-household objects<br />

were nearly even distributed in the city cell, relevant to the steps of services<br />

shared at that time, with taking into consideration normative radiuses of<br />

accessibility.<br />

Market relations, mainly, were reflected in dislocation of small trading objects.<br />

In 1993 was allowed street trade practically everywhere and in every form.<br />

This type of trade soon was joined by transformation of ground floor of the<br />

residential houses into the trading and household establishments. It’s<br />

important to mention, that in the process of seeking own space on the market<br />

the profile and class of these small objects was somehow changed; This<br />

process, really little slowly but still can be witnessed. Houses ground floors<br />

which made shelters for trading and service objects, weren’t satisfying new<br />

purpose with their first planning structure (problem of entrance from the street;<br />

engineering equipment, sanitarian conditions, non-existence of stores and<br />

secondary closets, etc.). many problems are generated from arranging<br />

downstairs in the cellars, what often was managed to accomplish using the<br />

street sidewalks. Today in the central part of the city can be noticed internal<br />

development of the offices already allocated on the ground floor, on behalf of<br />

the second, seldom the third floors. In terms of real estate must be underlined<br />

the fact, that such legal persons, as a rule, don’t participate in the<br />

management of the whole house (condominium), despite the requirements of<br />

the civic code.<br />

Early simultaneously only with the diversification of the residential house<br />

functions, was implemented departing, reducing of the structures of above<br />

mentioned large organization-establishments and degovernmentation of most<br />

of their owned buildings. Most important is the fact, that this process was<br />

being implemented omitting municipalization stage of the real estate, with<br />

fading the urban land problem. Even the management of the buildings in the<br />

hands of multi proprietors wasn’t meeting even old requirements (elevators,<br />

engineering equipments, cleanliness, fire security, etc.).<br />

Following stage of development is presented by promotion and construction<br />

of originally mixed function buildings, when 1-2 floors were accounted on<br />

office or trade and service objects, above which were located flats.<br />

Simultaneously some large companies were constructing separately located<br />

headquarters.<br />

New stage of creating and exploiting office spaces is construction of the<br />

special buildings, what is recently observed in Tbilisi. In this direction, it’s<br />

worth to notice basically office and trade building, which is being constructed<br />

on Ilia Chavchavadze Avenue #34, and “Axis towers” also on I.


Chavchavadze Avenue. The latest is the mode of “second hand” architecture<br />

(such objects of curved prisms (forms) are planned in Istanbul and Astana),<br />

but today already announced prices dictate that These office spaces will<br />

respond to the high rate of the international classification.<br />

As for the mass and wholesale large trade objects (so-called “’bazrobebi”),<br />

Two of them Lilo and Navtlughi fairs are located in the South-East periphery of<br />

the city, and the attempts to move other two (to Dezertirebi market and Eliava<br />

street) to the North-West periphery had no results and the government was<br />

forced to be contended with making them “noble” at the same places.<br />

Although, in terms of city planning, their location will dramatically damage the<br />

city environment. Expansion of the restaurants and entertainment<br />

establishment network (including casinos) maybe considered as an average<br />

indicator of increase of economic wealth of the particular part of the<br />

population. In addition if the casinos are concentrated in the central part of the<br />

city (today, as a result of particular legislative steps only several casinos are<br />

operating in Tbilisi and there’s an idea of moving all of them to Tskhaltubo<br />

resort – like the planned measurements in Russia), newly opened restaurants<br />

are moving in the direction of Old Tbilisi or Automobile highways, basically on<br />

the Mtkvari embankment and in the North-West exit of the city.<br />

Construction of the sport-recreational objects are not following the<br />

requirements - there are only 2 modern swimming pools in Tbilisi. It’s being<br />

implemented assimilating of the water reservoirs in terms of amenities – here<br />

on the first place is “kus Tba” lake; It is followed by Lisi lake and Tbilsi sea.<br />

Internal quarter mini-field (ground) network is being expanded (basically, with<br />

artificial cover). By means of private capital new tennis ground was built in<br />

Dighomi.<br />

Energetically is being constructed Orthodox churches, besides the Saint<br />

Trinity grand Cathedral, small parochial churches network will include every<br />

residential district – as central, so peripheral. It must be separated issue of<br />

developing hotels network. Recently, World brands of hotel economy such as<br />

Sheraton, Marriott, Hilton, Radisson have been wildly interested in Tbilisi.<br />

They operate in several directions – reconstruction of already existed hotels,<br />

demolition of already existed building and construction of the new hotels,<br />

acquiring of city forming objects and their adaptation. At the current stage<br />

such interest from the world brands isn’t defined only by new economic<br />

interests (operating hotels completing with guests is far from normative); It<br />

must be defined as by future expectations, so by the presence factor of<br />

assimilating world geography. Besides the entrance of the hotel-business<br />

grands on Tbilisi market, network of the small hotels are being developed –<br />

due to their low prices and familiar atmosphere. But, the main problem for the<br />

city ambitions to become tourist center still remains non-existence of large,<br />

cheap hotels and hostels for mass tourism. We’ll also name discrepancies of<br />

the city information system (including language) and catastrophic conditions of<br />

the public toilets – as in quantity terms, so in terms of quality among the<br />

factors biasing tourism in Tbilisi.<br />

In terms of internal city transport Tbilisi subway plays its stable role, which<br />

saved Tbilisi from functional disintegration in the period of civil war. In the<br />

recent years, as a result of reforms implemented in the transport system, tram<br />

(transport) has been practically moved out of the city streets, also trolley bus<br />

lines has been reduced to minimum, little early fully was demolished the<br />

network of the rope lines. Positive event is changing unmanaged multi


number of micro bus taxis (“marshutka”) in the central street of the capital with<br />

civic buses, although set of factors bias the normal functioning of the public<br />

transport (the model of acquired buses; discrepancies of traffic organization –<br />

for example “transport triangle of the Vera district”; ignoring the interests of<br />

pedestrians, mainly the disabled persons; low rate of discipline among the<br />

drivers and pedestrians; non-existence of automobile residences, etc. ).<br />

Improvement of Tbilisi city transport system will be facilitated by implementing<br />

recommendations on the basis of international contest, presentation of which<br />

is expected in May.<br />

As for external transport, activities for rehabilitation of the Tbilisi central railway<br />

station arebeing performed; construction of railway branch from Kakheti line to<br />

newly built airport is expected to start; Although non-existence of the<br />

technical-economic documentation and miscalculation of the project in the<br />

layer of regional planning must be considered as a serious discrepancy.<br />

Under the conditions of distributing real estate, most attractive advantage of<br />

the industrial objects was considered to be territories occupied by the latest. It<br />

was particularly essential in the central zones and the ones near it. In the<br />

years of Independence most part of the Tbilisi industrial objects stopped<br />

functioning; Engines and equipments were sold as black scrap metals; And<br />

the buildings itself in terms of modern technologies, didn’t make any sense<br />

anymore. Instead of it, increased the interests of the builders to the territories<br />

occupied by the above mentioned objects. On some of this territory already is<br />

implementing construction of commercial housing (for example, silk weaving<br />

plant territory in Vera district). Together with this, still exist such large industrial<br />

zones, which don’t yet rise interest among developers (for instance, industrial<br />

zone of Ulianovka); Converse of such zones would be facilitated in the case of<br />

supporting steps taken by state/city.<br />

Tbilisi, as a capital of the country takes functions of the central and city<br />

government, which is reflected in the location of administrative institutional<br />

structures and relevant objects.<br />

Central functions are mainly gathered in the center of Tbilisi, but also there are<br />

some exceptions. The example of territorial decentralization effort is the<br />

Constitutional Court, moving of which was planned at first in the direction to<br />

the city of Mtskheta and now to the city of Kutaisi. New residence of the<br />

President of Georgia is being built in the district of Avlabari, which has a<br />

prospect for urban renewal.<br />

As for the city administration, as a result of new reform “Greater Tbilisi”<br />

consists of 7 administrational districts. Their overwhelming sizes and the<br />

difficulties with access to the district administrations (so-called “gamgeoba”)<br />

doesn’t respond to such fundamental principles of the local self-government<br />

as subsidiary and, also the historically formed tradition of structuring Tbilisi<br />

territory as natural community.<br />

Current radical reforms in the educational system was reflected in the<br />

territorial localization of educational and upbringing establishments of various<br />

level and rate. If early, in the Soviet period, nursery schools of children and<br />

secondary schools networks, basically, served the population living near<br />

them, today under the conditions of educational objects privatization and<br />

abolishment of the records, the importance of their profile and financial terms<br />

of teaching are emphasized.


As for the higher education, its objects are experiencing enlargement,<br />

institutional restructuring, quantitative reduction in the way of restricting<br />

accreditation terms. Although, localization of the leading higher education<br />

objects remains basically unchanged.<br />

The same may be said about the reforms of the healthcare and social work<br />

system; Georgian Orthodox church, non-government and international<br />

organizations begin to play notable role in this system.<br />

Under Tbilisi conditions it’s very important to keep public spaces. As a result<br />

of unanalyzed and often crime like privatization, the part of such important<br />

elements of the city space as embankments, river channel and city square<br />

moved into the hands of the private capital. Most harmful was the privatization<br />

of such important for the city objects against the societal opinion, as Rikhis<br />

Ubani on the left embankment of the river Mtkvari, within the historical core of<br />

the city.<br />

Sport-recreational objects are suffering from the attacks of the builders. It’s<br />

already implementing or is starting building of such objects as the river Vere<br />

gorge, which was forming as the children city “Mziuri” in the Soviet period;<br />

Hippodrome of Tbilisi, stadium territory in Avlabari, etc. Tbilisi greenery is also<br />

under the pressure (residential house in Alexander garden, separating<br />

territories in the park of Vake and near wood-parks for the Embassies and<br />

Football Federation, construction of elite residential houses in Bagebi, etc.).<br />

Generally, may be said that Tbilisi now is in the transitional stage of getting<br />

familiar with modern social-economic conditions and relations of its functionalspatial<br />

organization and planning structure. Action in every particular case of<br />

urban development is an unique combination of multi and often subjective or<br />

contradictional factors. Following the maturing of the real estate market and<br />

generally market relations, Tbilisi spatial-territorial development, distribution of<br />

various functions, their restructuring and formation of modern body of the city<br />

will become more comprehensive, adequate and forecasting, what will finally<br />

maintain economic development of Tbilisi, as a large urban center.


As a result of social and economic transformation that has been taking place<br />

for the last few years in Georgia and the region Tbilisi is facing both new<br />

challenges and development opportunities. The analyses, surveys and<br />

discussions with stakeholders prove that:<br />

• the City economy has a major share in the Georgian gross national<br />

product,<br />

• the productivity of Tbilisi companies is higher than of the companies<br />

operating in other parts of Georgia,<br />

• Tbilisi labour market generates more well-paid jobs for highly qualified<br />

specialists than the other parts of Georgia,<br />

• the volume of local salaries creates the major consumption market in<br />

Georgia,<br />

• improved telecommunication infrastructure enhances Tbilisi’s links<br />

with the rest of the region and of the world,<br />

• Tbilisi has an attractive offer for various groups of visitors,<br />

• an increasing number of links with the region and the world attracts<br />

new firms and cooperators, improves competitiveness of the existing<br />

companies and introduces new market standards,<br />

• the development potential of Tbilisi encourages the growth of<br />

suburban areas thus creating the base for a metropolitan area,<br />

• the potential of companies operating in the growth sectors forces them<br />

to explore new markets in order to maintain development tendencies.<br />

The above findings are the basis for recommending measures to be taken in<br />

order to strengthen the position of Tbilisi as the service center for the region.<br />

The city attractiveness, the potential of local firms and the range of offered<br />

services, the quality of workforce and a multi cultural heritage enable Tbilisi to<br />

serve not only its metropolitan area and Georgia, but also the region of the<br />

Black and the Caspian Sea.<br />

The unfinished transformation of economy requires firms, employees and<br />

public institutions to adjust to the changing situation on the global markets.<br />

The City and other public institutions should support new forms of<br />

organisations and professional training and create space for new enterprises.<br />

One of the major conditions of local growth is to make the existing firms stay<br />

in the city and attract new investors from outside as well as to prevent present<br />

inhabitants from leaving the city and encourage others to come and settle<br />

down. The attractiveness of Tbilisi center, the quality of life or an easy start for<br />

companies are the project areas that should be supported and implemented<br />

directly by the City authorities.


The strength of local communities and the skills of local workforce outline the<br />

growth potential of Tbilisi. The City should get involved in:<br />

• strengthening local communities because it leads to better quality of<br />

life and to higher real property value in the residential areas,<br />

• making development opportunities equal for everybody in order to<br />

prevent large social groups from being excluded from the<br />

development mainstream,<br />

• support talented people because it is them who will decide about the<br />

future city potential.<br />

The cooperation of diverse partners is a key to success for many today’s<br />

enterprises. The City can play a coordinator and facilitator role in the dialogue<br />

and the cooperation of:<br />

• citizens,<br />

• social organisations,<br />

• firms,<br />

• public institutions,<br />

• various tiers of national government.<br />

In cooperation with national and foreign partners Tbilisi can strengthen its<br />

recognisability as a meeting, business, culture and science center. A City’s<br />

recognizable brand is one of the fundamental conditions to attract<br />

cooperators, investors and visitors.<br />

The table below presents alternative strategies, their aims as well as the<br />

strategy implementation objectives and potential activities.


Alternative<br />

Strategy implementation objectives Strategy implementation activities Strategy implementation<br />

strategies<br />

aim<br />

Tbilisi as regional<br />

center<br />

• Access to the places, people<br />

and initiatives,<br />

• Logistic hub,<br />

• Regional meeting place,<br />

• Tourism destination,<br />

• Forge cooperation with post<br />

industrial regional centers for mutual<br />

benefits<br />

Support organization of different kind of international meetings that<br />

will bring to Tbilisi people, businesses and ideas,<br />

Working with airport authority;<br />

• improve passenger services and connections with city<br />

center,<br />

• attract new carriers to include Tbilisi into their networks, with<br />

special focus on regional connections,<br />

In cooperation with other partners facilitate and assist in<br />

development of logistic center near airport and railway.<br />

Use marketing and public relations to promote Tbilisi to targeted<br />

industries and organizations,<br />

Develop tourism information system,<br />

Organize city tourism information office and Tbilisi convention and<br />

visitors bureau,<br />

Facilitate development of special sites that can be recognized<br />

worldwide,<br />

Attraction of targeted industries, commercial uses, headquarters,<br />

Initiate network of post soviet cities building knowledge based<br />

economies,<br />

Strengthen role of Tbilisi as<br />

regional hub organizing and<br />

attracting business, civic,<br />

political, scientific,<br />

entertainment, and sport<br />

activities and events. Locate in<br />

Tbilisi regional offices of<br />

business and institutions.<br />

Focus on change<br />

and competitiveness<br />

• Linking innovation to Tbilisi<br />

businesses,<br />

• Development of competitive<br />

Tbilisi clusters,<br />

• Provide space with assistance<br />

for start –ups,<br />

• Development of business<br />

environment institutions and services.<br />

Monitor and review city economic situation on annual basis,<br />

Identify products and services that will have the most competitive<br />

position at international markets,<br />

Conducting of business attitude surveys:<br />

• Cluster development needs<br />

• Stat –ups development needs<br />

Developed business<br />

environment for Tbilisi new<br />

economy.


• Technology transfer needs<br />

• Workforce development needs<br />

Development of cluster’s networks of most competitive sectors:<br />

• Tourism cluster<br />

• Creative cluster<br />

• Education and training cluster<br />

Provide electronic platform for e-business,<br />

Working with other public and private institutions facilitate and<br />

support through targeted public investment development of :<br />

• Business incubators<br />

• Industrial parks<br />

• Technology parks<br />

Support development of institutions providing financing to Tbilisi’s<br />

small and medium companies:<br />

• Grant and micro credits<br />

• Guaranties<br />

• Venture capital<br />

Assist start-ups and small medium companies :<br />

• Delivering needed information<br />

• Organizing trainings for managers<br />

• IT and Internet use ability for business purposes<br />

• Assistance in obtaining finances<br />

• Offering space to grow with assistance<br />

• Offering business consulting and mentoring<br />

Conducting economic missions for cluster partners to innovative<br />

regions,<br />

Organizing presentations at industry shows serving Tbilisi targeted<br />

industries,


Marketing Tbilisi<br />

livable city and<br />

convenient for<br />

business<br />

• Invest in City Center,<br />

• Invest in housing districts,<br />

• Offer a space for different<br />

size businesses,<br />

• Invest in commercial corridors,<br />

• Invest in development zones,<br />

• Concentrate public investment<br />

to facilitate private development,<br />

Development of various publications (electronic and typed versions):<br />

• Companies and investment projects important for Tbilisi<br />

• Tbilisi conference abilities<br />

• Tbilisi successful companies<br />

• Map of Tbilisi most important businesses<br />

• Tbilisi – place where it is possible to do business<br />

Firms – creators of Tbilisi brand<br />

Identify, protect and serve with technical infrastructure areas for new<br />

functions within city territory that are crucial for city development:<br />

• Different kinds of housing<br />

• Public services<br />

• Transit<br />

• Offices<br />

• Retail<br />

• Hotels and restaurants<br />

• Entertainment<br />

• Recreational areas<br />

• Industries<br />

• Warehousing and logistic<br />

• Research and development,<br />

Support improvement of existing features in the city center that can<br />

attract tourists,<br />

Stimulate broad band internet access for businesses and citizens in<br />

the city area,<br />

Seek funding for preservation and rehabilitation of historic facilities,<br />

Facilitate service and transit oriented development around rail and<br />

metro stations,<br />

Identify and support development of commercial corridors serving<br />

<br />

Attract new businesses,<br />

institutions and residents to<br />

the city, as well as retain those<br />

who are already living or<br />

working in Tbilisi. Revitalize<br />

deprived city areas. Create<br />

identity of different districts and<br />

neighborhoods.


People power Tbilisi<br />

economy<br />

• Strong local communities,<br />

• Improve economic inclusion to<br />

enable all citizens to fulfil their<br />

potential,<br />

• Workforce development,<br />

• Invest in talents.<br />

with retail and commercial services Tbilisi living districts:<br />

• Conduct research to identify market needs and prepare<br />

business recruitment strategy for each commercial zone<br />

• Establish land use regulations<br />

• Provide targeted public investment<br />

• Coordinate public services within the area<br />

Promote housing and mixed use development in commercial<br />

corridors,<br />

Identify and support revitalization of development zones that will<br />

provide space for new commercial and public initiatives through:<br />

• zoning<br />

• targeted public investment,<br />

Continue activities to promote redevelopment of post industrial<br />

areas,<br />

Support renovation of city public and private cultural, and<br />

recreational facilities at the neighborhood level,<br />

Enhance the position of Tbilisi retail services,<br />

Monitor Tbilisi labour market developments and changes on the<br />

annual basis,<br />

Conducting surveys of youth professional potentials and aspirations,<br />

Identifying partners and donors, working on issues of vocational<br />

trainings,<br />

<br />

Develop employee skills to<br />

meet demand of labour market<br />

and offer all citizens equal<br />

chances to participate in<br />

economic, social, political,


Survey how economy is developing, what kind of work places are<br />

created, what kind of qualification people will be needed,<br />

Facilitate development of career development paths for most needed<br />

professions,<br />

Develop labour market information system with internet portal,<br />

Assist schools and other educational institutions serving youth to<br />

make ICT technology and language skills a priority.<br />

Support efforts of schools, training institutions and employment<br />

service providers to prepare citizens for employment opportunities.<br />

Facilitate cooperation of targeted industries with schools and<br />

universities,<br />

Organize city job and education fairs on annual basis:<br />

• Employers will present job opportunities and conditions<br />

• Consultations for pupils graduating from school on choosing<br />

jobs and professional careers,<br />

• Providing information on where and what can they study,<br />

• New professions emerging at labor market,<br />

• Information on scholarships and grants for students and<br />

pupils,<br />

• Trainings in writing CV, preparing for interviews,<br />

Organize financial support for best pupils and students,<br />

Award best pupils achievements,<br />

Support vocational training and life long learning initiatives providing<br />

assistance to mature workforce,<br />

Develop assistance for low skilled people and youth at risk disabled<br />

people that will create work opportunities for those groups,<br />

<br />

cultural activities of Tbilisi<br />

community.


Brand Tbilisi as a<br />

place where you can<br />

be understood and<br />

supported<br />

• Improve coordination of<br />

different partners to maximize<br />

economic growth,<br />

• Business, engaged in<br />

development project,<br />

• Different tires of public<br />

administration involved in strategy<br />

implementation.<br />

• City administration works as<br />

coordinator and facilitator of<br />

development initiatives.<br />

Organize City Development Council with business, social and<br />

political leaders advising Mayor of Tbilisi on city development<br />

objectives,<br />

Organize City Development Council with business, social and<br />

political leaders,<br />

Conduct platform for discussion and coordination of metropolitan<br />

issues,<br />

Organize and facilitate Education – Business Round Table,<br />

Institutionalize community based programs offering organizational<br />

and financial support for local communes revitalizing their<br />

neighborhoods,<br />

Improvement of qualifications and attitude of local government staff:<br />

• Creating group directly operating with business and raising<br />

its qualifications<br />

• Creating group operating with investors and raising its<br />

qualifications<br />

• Periodic publication presenting office’s services<br />

<br />

Institutionalize cooperation<br />

with:<br />

• Local communities,<br />

• Businesses,<br />

• Neighboring municipalities,<br />

• Other public institutions


When creating long-lasting mechanisms of activities stimulating local<br />

economy it is a matter of fundamental value to find a partner institution who<br />

will initiate and coordinate development programmes.<br />

The local government needs partners not only among ordinary people,<br />

institutions and organisations in the City but should also find external partners<br />

such as banks, regional authorities and business organisations who can offer<br />

help in developing local job market.<br />

When implementing the economic development strategy for Tbilisi the<br />

following measures will be of key importance:<br />

• cooperation among the stakeholders,<br />

• establishing a municipal structure that is capable of generating and<br />

implementing local economic policy,<br />

• identification of priority projects being the foundation of local economic<br />

development,<br />

• starting cooperation with other cities that are undergoing the process<br />

of similar transformation by means of best practices,<br />

• encouraging local economic growth, which is such form of activity that<br />

requires specific skills and initiatives that are beyond the city hall’s<br />

traditional forms of activity.<br />

An important role in strategy implementation can be played by efficient<br />

Economic Development Agencies.<br />

It is worth consideration that in the course of strategy implementation the<br />

Tbilisi City Hall department dealing with economic development could be<br />

transformed into an independent city agency provided with resources<br />

necessary to carry out strategy tasks.<br />

The Agency should:<br />

• employ a team of experts capable of project implementation,<br />

• develop a range of instruments to support companies and workforce,<br />

• have at their disposal the funds enabling them to realize tasks by<br />

means of their own earnings and subsidies for projects.<br />

A non-governmental organisation that is competent to perform such tasks,<br />

has adequate human technical and financial resources will secure sustained<br />

activity and will immediately react to changing conditions.<br />

When developing the Economic Development Strategy of Tbilisi City a<br />

workshop was held where the participants learned how to establish an NGO<br />

(foundation, association) and how to develop with local partners the local<br />

operation programme, methods and forms of raising funds for operation and<br />

project implementation.<br />

Below the most important projects have been presented whose scopes and<br />

subjects result directly from the entrepreneurs’ opinion. The projects were<br />

developed during the workshop meetings with stakeholders and they deal<br />

with: workforce, business activity financing, organising business activity<br />

space, application of new technologies in economic development, support for<br />

tourism and creative clusters.


SME support projects<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />


.


- <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

- <br />

<br />

- <br />

- <br />

-


• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

-


-


-


-


Tourism development projects<br />

<br />

Tourist Information centre ( TIC )


Tourism development projects<br />

<br />

Tourist Information centre ( TIC )


Tourism development projects<br />

<br />

Tourist Information centre ( TIC )


− <br />

<br />

− <br />

<br />

<br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />


− <br />

<br />

− <br />

<br />

<br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />


Workforce development projects<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

- <br />

- <br />

- <br />

- <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

- <br />

<br />

- <br />

- <br />

<br />

<br />

- <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

- <br />

- <br />

-


-<br />

-


-<br />

<br />

-<br />

-<br />

<br />

<br />

-


-<br />

<br />

-<br />

-<br />

<br />

<br />

-


- <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

-


<strong>LOCAL</strong><br />

<strong>ECONOMIC</strong><br />

<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />

<strong>PLAN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>TBILISI</strong><br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

EFFECTIVE STRATEGY<br />

IMPLEMENTATION<br />

METHODOLOGIES<br />

Tbilisi City Hall │ Economic Policy Agency<br />

Address: 2, Liberty Sq │ Tbilisi 0105, Georgia<br />

Tel.:(+99532)932314 │ Fax.:(+99532)932895<br />

E-Mail: economic@tbilisi.gov.ge<br />

www.tbilisi.gov.ge<br />

1


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................4<br />

1. Strategic management framework and the city competitiveness.........................................................5<br />

2. Integration of strategic management framework.....................................................................................7<br />

3. Strategy implementation methodological guidelines ...........................................................................13<br />

3.1. Partners participating in the plan development process.......................................................................14<br />

3.2. Process of writing the Corporate City Development Plan ....................................................................15<br />

3.2.1. Organization of teams dealing with the Plan development...........................................................15<br />

3.2.2. Plan development process phases – the first edition....................................................................15<br />

3.3. Methodology of updating the Corporate City Development Plan.........................................................17<br />

3.3.1. Principal conditions for updating.....................................................................................................17<br />

3.3.2. Cyclic activities ................................................................................................................................17<br />

3.3.3. Timetable.........................................................................................................................................19<br />

3.3.4. Summing-up....................................................................................................................................20<br />

4. Strategy implementation tools ..................................................................................................................21<br />

4.1. Corporate City Development Plan - responsibilities of involved partners...........................................23<br />

4.2. Corporate City Development Plan – timeframe ....................................................................................24<br />

4.3. Programs card.........................................................................................................................................25<br />

4.4. Projects card ...........................................................................................................................................27<br />

4.5. Project feasibility study ...........................................................................................................................28<br />

5. Appendix – Directive of the Mayor of Tbilisi on up dating and implementation of the<br />

Strategy Implementation Plan for Tbilisi .................................................................................................33<br />

2


CHARTS<br />

Chart 2-1 City strategy structure....................................................................................................................................................8<br />

Chart 2-2 Integrated strategic management framework...........................................................................................................10<br />

Chart 4-1 Strategy Implementation Plan.....................................................................................................................................22<br />

TABLES<br />

Table 4-1 Corporate City Development Plan - responsibilities of involved partners. ...........................................................23<br />

Table 4-2 Corporate City Development Plan – timetable.......................................................................................................24<br />

3


Introduction<br />

Today, when the pace of economic changes has accelerated, it is necessary<br />

to take advantage of this experience and work out such an instrument that will<br />

enhance the application of city economic development methods coordinated<br />

with overall city and national development strategies.<br />

The presented proposal satisfies this need since it deals with such<br />

organisation and procedures of integrated management that combine longterm<br />

strategy goals with medium-term implementation objectives as well as<br />

with individual projects and current local government tasks. Moreover, it is an<br />

impulse to mobilise all the groups interested in conscious and active creation<br />

of local development programs and their implementation.<br />

It seems obvious that such activity should be of permanent nature. Therefore<br />

it is necessary to institutionalise Corporate City Development Plan (CCDP) as<br />

integration platform for city strategic management framework and tool for<br />

successful strategy implementation. Corporate City Development Plan is a<br />

mid-term plan updated annually for next three – five years and consists of<br />

different projects generated within sectoral strategies that support city<br />

strategic gaols and objectives. Corporate plan it also a tool for integration of<br />

strategy with city annual budget.<br />

Local Economic Development (<strong>LED</strong>) plan is on of sectoral strategies that play<br />

key role in city development programming. When the <strong>LED</strong> gaols and<br />

objectives are agreed and priority projects identified, they can be incorporated<br />

into CCDP financed from city budget. Integration of strategic management<br />

framework and efficient cooperation of all involved partners is possible when:<br />

• CCDP development process is defined and formalized on annual<br />

basis<br />

• CCDP development process is synchronized with preparation of city<br />

budget, investment and mid-term financial plan<br />

• all partners and their responsibilities in the process are defined<br />

• standardized tolls are used by all partners and sectoral programs to<br />

prepare strategy implementation projects<br />

• selection criteria should be based on city development objectives so<br />

all sectoral programs will follow city strategy aims.<br />

Report strength the role of efficient management for city competitiveness<br />

position, presents conditions of integrated management framework as well as<br />

methodology of Corporate City Development Plan. Special tools of successful<br />

strategy implementation system are presented at the end of report.<br />

4


1. Strategic management framework and the city competitiveness<br />

Cities are now competing at both a national and international level to attract<br />

investment, citizens as well as visitors.<br />

Where globalization has had a positive effect in stimulating economic growth,<br />

these benefits have not been evenly distributed. Cities therefore continue to<br />

experience problems of poverty and inequality. In developing cities these<br />

problems are compounded by urbanization which has led to problems of<br />

unemployment, the proliferation of informal settlements and environmental<br />

degradation. All cities have to face challenges because of:<br />

1. economy transformation from the traditional to new knowledge based<br />

economy<br />

2. limited revenue capacity of companies, citizens and local<br />

governments<br />

3. movement of people and businesses<br />

4. suburbanization and poverty in central areas<br />

5. need of new education following workforce development demand<br />

And last but not list there is huge pressure to change city government roles<br />

and management methodologies to follow all these changes and challenges.<br />

Since the 1980s there have been increasing efforts to introduce new<br />

management methodologies to city administrations. Different solutions were<br />

exercised in different countries but two issues were key elements of new<br />

systems:<br />

1. strategic planning methodology when new strategies and polices were<br />

developed<br />

2. integration of strategic management framework to coordinate all<br />

sectoral plans and different partners involved in a timeframe<br />

Transformation require efficient management to follow all changes, to face<br />

challenges and to utilize resources efficiently. It's universally known that<br />

better performing cities and those recognized as skilfully managed are more<br />

attractive for new businesses. Although there is a lack of comparative<br />

standards with which to measure whether a city is well performing and<br />

assess key drivers of high performance, it is obvious that ability to cope with<br />

5


change, leadership and vision shown by city representatives, its economic,<br />

social and cultural diversity as well as its ability to make effective use of<br />

human capital are the conditioning foundations of high performing city.<br />

There are of cities that present high performance which are not<br />

geographically centrally located and are not national capital cities. There is no<br />

single model for creating high performing cities. Examples cited included<br />

places as varied as market driven American cities like San Jose, supported by<br />

government Asiatic cities as Singapore and somewhere in between the<br />

European cities such as Dublin, Barcelona or Scandinavian cities. High<br />

performance can be achieved under a variety of governance arrangements,<br />

but usually results in high quality of life, better infrastructure and favorable<br />

business environment with skilled workforce.<br />

The fact that some sectors achieve a critical mass in a city may be more<br />

important than<br />

the location of a city itself. San Jose’s global position in the research and<br />

commercialization of new technologies is not based on its location but on the<br />

fact that this sector demonstrates a high degree of clustering and innovation,<br />

which makes the city attractive to the others.<br />

There are some obstacles on the way to a well managed competitive city that<br />

should be taken into a count:<br />

1. the importance of developing effective metropolitan policies and engaging<br />

in long term spatial planning,<br />

2. new strategies require strong civic leadership and vision to convince<br />

public to changes,<br />

3. weak citizen participation is a current and future problem and may result<br />

in declining identification with governance structures and policies,<br />

4. coordination and cooperation between different levels (region,<br />

neighborhood) , sectors and partners (public, private and community<br />

organizations or decision makers, professionals and stakeholders),<br />

5. the question how far local government should be involved in local<br />

economy.<br />

These and other important issues should be discussed with a local<br />

stakeholders at the beginning when the framework is constructed. The<br />

agreement will create boundaries for all policies and define public role in city<br />

development activities.<br />

6


2. Integration of strategic management framework<br />

Cities operate on the basis of different legal regulations that define city<br />

responsibilities and polices which articulate community goals. The city<br />

development strategy (CDS) covers community long term vision, gaols,<br />

objectives and is the guideline for all city development activities. While the<br />

cities operate not only as basic municipal services supplier but they are more<br />

and more active as a coordinator and active partner in all initiatives important<br />

for the city development, we are in the situation that many other programs are<br />

also developed to coordinate joint activities within different sectors. Local<br />

economic development ( <strong>LED</strong>) programs are the examples of local<br />

government leaders with stakeholders assessing economic competitiveness<br />

of the city and defining goals and tasks that should be undertaken. It is<br />

important to integrate strategies on the level of aims, but it is even more<br />

important and much more difficult to find the way that <strong>LED</strong> strategy<br />

implementation can be incorporated into CDS implementation process.<br />

All strategies are developed on the basis of strategic planning methodology.<br />

While some tools and procedures specific for a given sector can be used,<br />

basic elements of strategy development process are similar:<br />

• organization,<br />

• competitive assessment,<br />

• strategy formulation,<br />

• strategy implementation,<br />

• strategy monitoring and review.<br />

The <strong>LED</strong> strategic planning methodology that was implemented within World<br />

Bank’s Cities of Change program can be fully utilized for Tbilisi purpose. The<br />

methodology was based on a five-stage process:<br />

• organizing effort,<br />

• doing the competitive assessment,<br />

• preparing the strategy,<br />

• implementation of the strategy,<br />

• developing the monitoring and evaluation system.<br />

7


Chart 2-1 City strategy structure<br />

VISION<br />

STRATEGIC GOALS<br />

G G G<br />

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES<br />

Projects<br />

PROGRA<br />

PROGRAM 2<br />

PROGRAM 3<br />

PROGRAM<br />

Additionally, the method gives access to well tested tools of cooperation with<br />

stakeholders, to analyses and prognoses, to problem identification and<br />

structuring of goals, objectives and programs, to the identification and<br />

prioritizing of projects, their management and financing and, finally, to strategy<br />

evaluation and to reaching anticipated objectives.<br />

8


On that common basis the city management framework can be build.<br />

The following assumptions of the integrated strategic management system<br />

condition its success:<br />

• the vision and the objectives of the local community have been<br />

identified;<br />

• the process of development planning is fuelled by the needs and<br />

preferences of social partners and service receivers;<br />

• the management system is based on translating the strategy vision<br />

and objectives into the implementation plan priorities and the results of<br />

the completed projects;<br />

• responsibilities are fairly shared by politicians, professional and social<br />

partners;<br />

• institutional development is based on a step-by-step process and<br />

implementation plans are updated annually;<br />

• the indices of projects implementation are based on strategic<br />

objectives and on social expectations;<br />

• the effective monitoring and updating system is based on a repeatable<br />

process;<br />

• the annual budget preparations and the plan of strategy<br />

implementation are fully integrated;<br />

• the system of project management and inter-sector groups work has<br />

been implemented;<br />

• personal responsibilities have been defined and the staff training<br />

system has been implemented.<br />

Taking into account that strategic planning process starts from long term<br />

vision and step down to operational everyday tasks and services, three levels<br />

of the system should be identified:<br />

• Long-term strategy/policy planning framework.<br />

• Mid-term strategy implementation framework.<br />

• Operational task/service management framework.<br />

9


Chart 2-2 Integrated strategic management framework<br />

INTEGRATED STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK<br />

STRATEGIC<br />

<strong>PLAN</strong>NING<br />

FRAMEWORK<br />

STRATEGY<br />

IMPLEMENTATION<br />

FRAMEWORK<br />

OPERATIONAL<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

FRAMEWORK<br />

CITY<br />

STRATEGY<br />

CITY<br />

SECTORAL<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

CORPORATE CITY<br />

<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />

<strong>PLAN</strong><br />

4-6 YEARS<br />

SERVICE<br />

<strong>PLAN</strong>S<br />

2-3 YEARS<br />

ANNUAL<br />

SERVICE<br />

DEPARTMENTAL<br />

<strong>PLAN</strong>S<br />

CAPITAL<br />

IMPROVEMENT<br />

<strong>PLAN</strong><br />

4-6 YEARS<br />

CITY<br />

BUDGET<br />

FINANCIAL <strong>PLAN</strong><br />

6-8 YEARS<br />

Strategy planning level consists of city development strategy (CDS) and other<br />

sectoral strategies. Mid-term strategy implementation framework consists of<br />

service plans following sectoral strategies, a capital improvement plan (CIP), a<br />

mid-term financial plan (FP) and a city corporate development plan (CCDP).<br />

That is the integration platform for different sectoral objectives with city longterm<br />

goals (CDS) and financial and technical possibilities (CIP and FP). The<br />

operational level is based on a city budget (CB) and consists of annual<br />

departmental service plans.<br />

Effective strategic management of local government, requires coordinated<br />

planning and monitoring systems that enable key decision makers, both<br />

political and<br />

10


managerial, to take action based on facts about performance. Performance<br />

management can also be thought of as a tool to help link and underpin the<br />

initiatives that make up the<br />

modernization agenda. Following from the policy development cycle, there are<br />

three areas where indicators can assist local authorities in addressing the<br />

challenges faced by cities. These are:<br />

• developing appropriate policies with clear goals and strategies,<br />

• monitoring the performance and reporting progress of local<br />

governments implementing strategies,<br />

• reviewing policies and strategies.<br />

Since the goals of urban policy cut across different sectors, and should reflect<br />

changes of different level of the strategic management framework (from<br />

project results to strategy aims) the indicators will be of four types:<br />

• Input indicators. Inputs are the resources allocated to specific tasks, such<br />

as the amount of money spent or the total number of employee/hours<br />

needed to deliver a service or project,<br />

• Output indicators. These reflect the quantity of products or units of service<br />

provided to the population,<br />

• Outcome indicators. These measures report the results of programs and<br />

services or relate to the quality of the service e.g. measures of customer<br />

satisfaction,<br />

• Impact indicators. These assess long term quality changes that strategy<br />

implementation activities create in the city changing living conditions or<br />

improving business environment.<br />

When designing monitoring system in practice, specific indicators should be<br />

identified and allocated for specific deliverables. Starting from the bottom of<br />

framework we have projects. Their results can be assessed by means of<br />

output indicators. Programs grouping a similar projects can be reviewed with<br />

outcome indicators. Impact indicators can be designated to strategy objectives<br />

and goals. Such a solution will support integration of the whole strategic<br />

management framework and will work in both directions top-down and<br />

bottom-up. When developing strategy implementation activities (coming down<br />

11


from strategy goals and objectives) it will help to select right projects<br />

supporting realization of the strategy concrete aims. Monitoring and reviewing<br />

strategy results we can assess how specific projects and programs<br />

participate in the upper level strategy deliverables.<br />

Each indicator should be defined according to the specific result it is allocated<br />

to. When the indicator is measured it should be also be agreed what is its<br />

baseline and what targets should be achieved in a frame of strategy<br />

implementation plan.<br />

12


3. Strategy implementation methodological guidelines<br />

This chapter contains information about the organisation, principles and<br />

procedures of writing the first and subsequent Corporate City Development<br />

Plans. In this area it is crucial to create procedures of efficient communication,<br />

to specify personal responsibility and to activate social and business groups. It<br />

is also important to approach the Plan as the principal management tool. It is<br />

worth pointing out that it is necessary to verify the procedures and rules<br />

applied in the process of writing and implementing the Plan. Thanks to the<br />

conclusions drawn from such an evaluation subsequent editions of the Plan<br />

can be improved.<br />

The chapter also includes the descriptions of organisation, procedures and<br />

institutional solutions needed when updating the Plan. Surprisingly, this<br />

process turns out to be equally challenging as the works on the initial edition.<br />

The authors should stay away from routine solutions so that they can remain<br />

innovative and avoid failure when starting new projects.<br />

An important rule when implementing the Plan is to follow closely the adopted<br />

procedures and make sure that everyone does their job. The principle idea of<br />

this proposal is permanent analysing and drawing conclusions from<br />

completed tasks because they form the foundation for future projects.<br />

13


3.1. Partners participating in the plan development process<br />

Generally understood social and economic development is the principal<br />

strategic objective of every commune as well as it is in the best interest of each<br />

individual. So, since the plan was to be written with the participation of all the<br />

concerned the partners who represented various interests and capabilities had<br />

to be selected very carefully. Such type of cooperation is the basis of the<br />

participation method which is considered to be highly effective.<br />

At the same time the success in writing a good plan depended on such<br />

allocation of competences that enabled experts to deal with analytic and<br />

conceptual work, while politicians and social partners could express their<br />

preferences in decision-making.<br />

The list of the participants in the Plan development process consisted of the<br />

representatives of:<br />

• the City residents,<br />

• key business groups,<br />

• public institutions in charge of local development,<br />

• self-government officials, local politicians,<br />

• non-governmental organisations – especially the social and economic<br />

ones.<br />

Also, specialists, outside consultants took part in the works.<br />

Local administration has to nominate the Plan coordinator. The Mayor of the<br />

City himself and through delegated specialists is responsible for the formal<br />

organisation and the Plan preparation. He is also in charge of logistics and the<br />

subject-matter side of the process.<br />

14


3.2. Process of writing the Corporate City Development Plan<br />

3.2.1. Organization of teams dealing with the Plan development<br />

In the process the works of preparatory and conceptual character were<br />

separated from the decision-making at different stages of the Plan<br />

development.<br />

The team organisation and the allocation of tasks were based on the rule that<br />

the selected groups of specialists performed all the works that required<br />

professional skills according to the best practice principle. The teams<br />

selected in such a way could quickly come to common conclusions. It should<br />

be emphasised how vast the range of problems addressed in the Plan was.<br />

The ability to synthesize problems is very useful in this process. Decision<br />

makers and stakeholders are not involved in document preparatory works -<br />

stakeholders consult The Mayor and City Council before they will take final<br />

decisions. Detailed tasks and harmonogram of work is presented later in the<br />

next chapter.<br />

By the City Mayor directive the following teams should be appointed to<br />

develop the Plan:<br />

• The City Development Council – stakeholder group,<br />

• Inter-sector Team of City Development Programme,<br />

• Working Team.<br />

3.2.2. Plan development process phases – the first edition<br />

Phase One – team organisation and procedure adopting:<br />

• appointing the Plan Working Team,<br />

• appointing the Inter-sector Plan Team,<br />

• appointing the City Development Council,<br />

• creating the consulting group,<br />

• adopting the Plan development procedure,<br />

• selecting techniques and instruments to carry out the works,<br />

• adopting a detailed schedule of the Plan development.<br />

15


Phase Two – the assessment of the development and competitiveness level<br />

of the City as the centre of entrepreneurship that provides its residents high<br />

quality of life:<br />

• collecting and processing information about the condition and<br />

perspectives of local development, including a series of surveys,<br />

• the analysis of the City’s condition in key areas,<br />

• the analysis of the City Development Strategy and <strong>LED</strong> program<br />

implementation results,<br />

• writing reports about the analyses,<br />

• conducting the SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities<br />

and threats), identifying key problems and defining development<br />

priorities.<br />

Phase three – the Plan development:<br />

• the review of strategic objectives<br />

• defining the Plan implementation indices (input, output, outcome and<br />

impact) as the basis of the monitoring system of the city development<br />

strategy implementation,<br />

• adopting the subject-matter material scope of the Plan, including the<br />

initial list of the strategic implementation projects.<br />

Phase four – preparing the Plan document, consultations and the approval:<br />

• gathering implementation projects, their assessment and selection,<br />

• preparing the draft Plan document,<br />

• presentation, consultations and modifications of the draft,<br />

• adopting the resolution by the City Council.<br />

16


3.3. Methodology of updating the Corporate City Development Plan<br />

As it has been mentioned before, the resolution concerning the Corporate City<br />

Development - the document of a strategic character - should not end the<br />

cooperation among partners involved in its realisation.<br />

3.3.1. Principal conditions for updating<br />

The Working and Inter-sector Teams as well as the City Development Council<br />

take over the responsibility for the Plan implementation and for its updating.<br />

The Council should play the role of a main consultative body for the Mayor<br />

and the City Council of Tbilisi in the process of updating the Plan.<br />

The conditions under which the adequate updating system will be applied<br />

strongly determine formal and organisational activities, define the Plan’s<br />

characteristics and regulate the Plan development works:<br />

• step-by-step character – updated annually,<br />

• duration 3– 5 years,<br />

• working on the Plan by means of standardised forms,<br />

• accurate and clear criteria of the implementation projects selection,<br />

• application of IT tools to create and update database,<br />

• sensitivity to changes in social and economic situation as well as in<br />

legal regulations,<br />

• stable procedures, instruments and collective bodies (the teams, the<br />

Council), consultations.<br />

3.3.2. Cyclic activities<br />

The updating should be performed annually – having in mind that not all the<br />

data will change in a yearly cycle.<br />

Phase I<br />

The cycle starts with collecting necessary information about the level of social<br />

and economic development, the strategy implementation and accompanying<br />

phenomena. This phase also includes surveys in business and social groups.<br />

Naturally, the more data is collected, the more reasonable further steps are. At<br />

this stage it is vital to determine the cycles at which individual data will be<br />

collected and to identify the sources where they can be found.<br />

17


Phase II<br />

As in every strategic programming process what should follow next is the<br />

analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and external threats the City<br />

has to face. It is a task that requires from the members of the Inter-sector<br />

Team a lot of effort and professionalism. The natural outcome of this analysis<br />

is the identification of key problems for Tbilisi development. Then, a<br />

conceptual work begins in order to decide on the ways of solving these<br />

problems, to define the priorities. These activities are performed by the Intersector<br />

Team of the City Development Programme and the City Development<br />

Council who define the development directions and recommend development<br />

priorities to the President of the City.<br />

Before the priorities are approved, the President consults the City Council<br />

commissions, local community and selected organisations.<br />

Phase III<br />

After the consultation the adopted priorities are publicly announced, which is<br />

an invitation to submit proposals of implementation projects. It is vital that the<br />

announcement of the priority development directions is addressed to all<br />

organisations and public administration institutions that are interested in<br />

implementing various projects within the announced priorities. The proposed<br />

implementation projects are submitted on standardized forms to the Working<br />

Team whose task is to compare the projects. Then the Working Team<br />

evaluates and selects the proposals. The evaluation and selection criteria are<br />

first of all based on their efficiency in implementing the adopted priorities and<br />

how well they are prepared. Then the shortlist is made of the ones that deal<br />

with the major strategic issues. After consultations with the City Council the list<br />

is eventually approved by the President.<br />

18


Phase IV<br />

The announcement of the list of the approved projects is the signal for the<br />

bidders to send application forms. The standardized forms helps to evaluate<br />

projects by comparing their main elements and to remain impartial. The<br />

applications are then analysed by the Plan Inter-sector Team who finally<br />

approves the projects that will contribute to working out the draft Corporate<br />

City Development Plan for Tbilisi based on the implementation objectives of<br />

the City Development Strategy. The Working Team writes the final version of<br />

the Plan.<br />

Then the President of the City consults various organisations and submits the<br />

Plan for the City Council’s approval.<br />

The implementation of the Plan requires a great deal of effort from all the<br />

participants. The course of implementation is monitored and continually<br />

adjusted due to changing conditions and unforeseen events.<br />

3.3.3. Timetable<br />

Every cycle begins with evaluation and gathering information about the<br />

economic and social situation in Tbilisi. All these elements are repeated.<br />

Professional evaluation of the City situation not only helps to identify the key<br />

problems to be solved in the next edition of the Plan, but also defines the<br />

needs of the opinion-making groups. It is easier to choose the best ways of<br />

public intervention if the conclusions from the analysis (the survey, statistical<br />

data analysis) are correct.<br />

As it has been mentioned, the Corporate City Development Plans should be<br />

developed in yearly cycles. When deciding when the works should commence<br />

it is reasonable to take into consideration the City budget procedure and<br />

reporting dates. It is important to remember about the deadlines of<br />

applications to financial institutions and organisations supporting<br />

implementation projects.<br />

Therefore, if the starting and final date of procedure is to be chosen well, it is<br />

important to take into consideration all these elements.<br />

19


3.3.4. Summing-up<br />

When updating the Corporate City development Plan it is crucial to continue<br />

the assumptions of its first edition. It is important to focus on the analysis of<br />

changes and the development strategy implementation level as well to draw<br />

right conclusions. It gives the opportunity to confirm that the adopted priorities<br />

are correct or modify them with due consideration. It also enables the<br />

authorities to eliminate less valuable projects.<br />

Additionally, it seems important that all the system participants avoid routine<br />

because it could adversely affect not only the Plan, but also hinder social<br />

participation.<br />

It is also worth emphasising that consulting each year the priorities of the<br />

Corporate City Development Plan with social partners encourages all parties<br />

willing to participate in its implementation process to submit their proposals.<br />

The participation of social partners in the process makes it possible to apply<br />

the „multidimensional selection” method that is used when choosing priority<br />

projects when the decision is made by a group of delegates who are<br />

representative for a local community.<br />

20


4. Strategy implementation tools<br />

21


MAYOR<br />

AND<br />

CITY COUNCIL<br />

Chart 4-1 Strategy Implementation Plan<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

<strong>FOR</strong><br />

NEW PERIODS<br />

<strong>PLAN</strong><br />

STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK<br />

APPROVAL<br />

OF<br />

<strong>PLAN</strong><br />

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT <strong>PLAN</strong><br />

<strong>LOCAL</strong> TAXES AND FEES<br />

BUDGET<br />

DEPARTAMENTAL SERVICE <strong>PLAN</strong>S<br />

PERSONAL TARGETS<br />

STAKEHOLDERS<br />

GROUP<br />

INTER<br />

DEPARTAMENTAL<br />

TEAM<br />

RECOMEN<br />

DATION OF<br />

PRIORITY<br />

ACTIONS<br />

Q1<br />

STRATEGY<br />

REVIEW<br />

AND<br />

KEY<br />

ISSUE<br />

IDENTY<br />

FICATION<br />

CONSULTATION<br />

OF<br />

DRAFT <strong>PLAN</strong><br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />

OF<br />

Q2 PROJECTS<br />

APPLICA<br />

Q3 Q4<br />

TIONS<br />

<strong>FOR</strong>MULATI<br />

ON OF<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>PLAN</strong><br />

WORKING<br />

TEAM<br />

STARTEG<br />

IMPLEMENT<br />

ATION<br />

REPORT<br />

AND SOCIAL<br />

<strong>ECONOMIC</strong><br />

ANALYSES<br />

COLLECTION<br />

AND<br />

REVIEW<br />

OF PROJECT<br />

APLICA<br />

TIONS<br />

22


4.1. Corporate City Development Plan - responsibilities of involved partners<br />

Table 4-1 Corporate City Development Plan - responsibilities of involved partners.<br />

Working team Inter department team Stakeholder Group<br />

Main task<br />

Logistic and organizational<br />

assistance for the process.<br />

As time goes by, members of<br />

the team should play more<br />

important role as professional<br />

specialists.<br />

Detailed tasks<br />

Constructing and updating city<br />

socio-economic database.<br />

Conducting strategy monitoring<br />

process – analyses of<br />

achieved targets (versus<br />

identified measures and<br />

indicators) and community<br />

survey.<br />

Technical preparations<br />

organization of all meetings,<br />

consultations.<br />

Participation in all meetings<br />

and consultations.<br />

Preparation of TOR’s and<br />

contracting external<br />

consultants.<br />

Key issues identification,<br />

Focusing on plan concept and<br />

presentations of draft plan<br />

before the Stakeholder Group<br />

Review of the materials<br />

prepared by working team and<br />

consultants<br />

SWOT Analysis<br />

Identification of key issues and<br />

recommendation of priorities.<br />

Measures and indicators for<br />

strategic objectives.<br />

Discussion on and initial<br />

approval of the strategy<br />

implementation draft Plan.<br />

Participation in further<br />

consultations and approval<br />

process.<br />

Discussion on the key issues;<br />

identification of priorities for<br />

coming period consultations<br />

and final approval of the draft<br />

Plan<br />

Discussion on analysis<br />

results.<br />

Review of objectives for<br />

coming planning period.<br />

Discussion on the draft Plan<br />

recommendation of<br />

necessary changes.<br />

Consultations of the draft<br />

plan with the community.<br />

Approval of the final draft plan<br />

and presentation of the plan<br />

to the Mayor and The City<br />

Council.<br />

23


4.2. Corporate City Development Plan – timeframe<br />

Table 4-2 Corporate City Development Plan – timetable<br />

The First Stage The Second Stage The Third Stage The Fourth Stage<br />

Strategy monitoring,<br />

competitive<br />

assessment<br />

Key issues<br />

identification and<br />

strategic objectives<br />

review<br />

Projects selection<br />

Formulation of<br />

Strategy,<br />

Implementation Plan;<br />

Business attitude<br />

survey, Youth<br />

aspirations and<br />

professional career<br />

opportunities survey,<br />

Quality of live survey.<br />

Information about<br />

strategy<br />

implementation plan<br />

results.<br />

A report on current<br />

economic and social<br />

situation. Pointing out<br />

changes in respect to<br />

the previous edition of<br />

the report with<br />

strategic and specific<br />

performance<br />

indicators.<br />

Evaluation of Plan<br />

implementation in the<br />

previous year.<br />

Pointing out<br />

tendencies<br />

Assessment city<br />

competitive position.<br />

Review of measures<br />

and indicators of<br />

implementation plan<br />

objectives.<br />

Announcement of<br />

project request<br />

conditions.<br />

Collection and review<br />

of projects requests.<br />

Evaluation of the<br />

projects according to<br />

implementation plan<br />

objectives.<br />

Identification of<br />

strategic projects<br />

Announcement of the<br />

shortlist of projects<br />

Projects technical<br />

preparations.<br />

Analyses of the<br />

projects technical and<br />

financial implications.<br />

Wide range<br />

consultations of the<br />

draft Strategy<br />

Presentation of the<br />

Strategy<br />

Implementation Plan<br />

to the City Council for<br />

approval.<br />

Deadline: 15th March Deadline: 30th April Deadline: 31st August Deadline: 15th<br />

December<br />

24


4.3. Programs card<br />

Program :<br />

Goal :<br />

Description of the program :<br />

Connection with other programs :<br />

Possible sources of financing:<br />

Partners, possible stakeholders:<br />

Expected results: outcomes<br />

Target group:<br />

Program coordinator:<br />

25


Connection with other strategies :<br />

Estimated costs ( annually):<br />

Total cost:<br />

Program team:<br />

Supervisor of the program:<br />

Chairman of the team:<br />

Members of the program working team :<br />

Consultants:<br />

26


4.4. Projects card<br />

Project Title:<br />

<strong>LED</strong> Program Type:<br />

Brief description of the project:<br />

Project leader ( implementer):<br />

Beneficiaries<br />

Potential partners and their benefits:<br />

-<br />

Potential contributions to the project:<br />

-<br />

Preconditions:<br />

Risk factors:<br />

Calculated expenses and financing sources Till 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Expenditur<br />

es<br />

Financing<br />

sources<br />

Investment costs<br />

Exploitation costs<br />

Local government budget<br />

State budget<br />

Donors<br />

Other sources<br />

Project results<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

27


4.5. Project feasibility study<br />

I. Basic Information<br />

1.1. Institution<br />

1.2. Team<br />

II. Information about the project<br />

2.1. Title of the project<br />

2.2. Localization<br />

2.3. Sector<br />

2.4. Type of project<br />

2.5. Definition of project goals<br />

28


III. Project identification<br />

3.1. Detailed project description<br />

3.2. Cooperation with other local governments and stakeholders<br />

3.3. Project impact to local economy and community<br />

3.4. Project impact to natural environment<br />

3.5. Project connection with strategies<br />

3.6. Tasks<br />

TASK DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE OTHERS<br />

Task 1<br />

Task ....<br />

IV. Project work plan<br />

4.1. Description of the work plan<br />

4.2. Graphic presentation of the work plan<br />

TASKS TIME TIME TIME TIME TIME TIME<br />

Task 1<br />

Task 2<br />

Task ..<br />

29


V. Budget of the project<br />

5.1. Estimated costs<br />

5.2. Possible sources of financing<br />

30


5.3. Detailed budget<br />

tasks<br />

task<br />

description<br />

COSTS CALCULATION<br />

number<br />

unit.<br />

RATE<br />

of units.<br />

TOTAL COST<br />

FINANCING SOURCES<br />

SOURCE 1 SOURCE 2 SOURCE 3<br />

Task 1<br />

Task 2<br />

Task 3<br />

Task 4<br />

Task 5<br />

Task 6<br />

Task ....<br />

Total (GEL)<br />

31


5.4. Cash flow analyses<br />

5.5. Project impact analyses<br />

VI. Additional information<br />

VII. Attachments<br />

32


5. Appendix – Directive of the Mayor of Tbilisi on up dating and<br />

implementation of the Strategy Implementation Plan for Tbilisi<br />

Directive No............. of the Mayor of Tbilisi<br />

of .........................................................<br />

on up-dating and implementation of the Strategy Implementation Plan for Tbilisi<br />

Under the provisions of the Resolution No .......... of Tbilisi City Council of............................ on passing<br />

the Strategy Implementation Plan for Tbilisi I hereby rule the following:<br />

§ 1<br />

I introduce the procedure of works concerning up-dating and implementing the Strategy<br />

Implementation Plan that has been attached to this Directive.<br />

§ 2<br />

I appoint the following Teams<br />

1. The Coordinating Team dealing with the Strategy Implementation Plan works. The Team is<br />

headed by ...................<br />

2. The Working Team<br />

3. The Interdepartmental Team<br />

4. Program Coordinators<br />

§ 3<br />

I oblige all the departments of Meria Tbilisi to cooperate with each other in developing the progressive<br />

Strategy Implementation Plan in accordance with their assigned responsibilities stated in the<br />

Appendix to this Directive.<br />

§ 4<br />

The Directive goes into effect on the day of its passage.<br />

REASONS <strong>FOR</strong> THE DECISION<br />

Under the provisions of the Resolution by Tbilisi City Council of ................. the Strategy<br />

Implementation Plan for the years of ........................ has been adopted. The Strategy<br />

Implementation Plan is a key element that integrates the city management system by linking<br />

long-term strategic objectives with the operational activity. A long-term plan of the most<br />

important development-oriented activities that has been founded on the priorities resulting from<br />

the current local social and economic situation is the basis for consecutive annual activity plans<br />

and budgets of the city. The annual mechanism of updating the Strategy Implementation Plan<br />

makes it a system tool to manage the growth of Tbilisi. Due to the participation in the process of<br />

diverse partners as well as to careful role distribution among specialists, social partners and<br />

decision-makers the Strategy Implementation Plan is not only an administrative procedure, but<br />

also a platform of cooperation for all groups that are responsible for and interested in the<br />

development of Tbilisi. Taking into consideration the nature of the annual Plan updating mechanism,<br />

it seems necessary to introduce a clear procedure and to define clearly personal responsibilities in<br />

order to make consequent editions of the Strategy Implementation Plan well prepared and effective.<br />

33


Appendix to the Mayor’s of<br />

Tbilisi Directive<br />

INTRODUCTORY IN<strong>FOR</strong>MATION<br />

1. The Strategy Implementation Plan is progressive.<br />

2. The Strategy Implementation Plan is a starting point for developing investment plans.<br />

3. The Strategy Implementation Plan is updated annually. Updating involves the introduction of new<br />

plans and updating data concerning projects that have already been included in the Plan. The<br />

time. perspective is prolonged by one year each time the next edition of the Plan is developed.<br />

4. Development of the Strategy Implementation Plan is always preceded by defining the local growth<br />

priorities.<br />

5. Every edition of the Plan is accompanied by the list of the most vital projects.<br />

6. The selection of projects to be included in the Plan is based on the evaluation criteria adopted in<br />

the decision-making process.<br />

34


1. STRUCTURING TEAMS DEALING WITH THE <strong>PLAN</strong> <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />

In the whole process the preparatory and conceptual works have been separated from the decisionmaking<br />

tasks on each stage of the Plan development. The teams and task separation are structured<br />

in such a way that selected groups of specialists can perform all the tasks that require professional<br />

background in accordance with good practice principles. If the team members are selected in this<br />

way, they are able to come to conclusions more effectively. The scope and diversity of issues tackled<br />

in the Plan are worth emphasising. The team members’ ability to synthetise and to analyse problems<br />

thoroughly will be a desired feature.<br />

The teams taking part in the Plan development:<br />

• Working Team<br />

• Interdepartmental Team<br />

• Social Council<br />

• Mayor and The City Council of Tbilisi<br />

• Specialists commissioned to perform special tasks<br />

The Working Team consists of 3-5 people – the employees of the Economic Policy Agency. The<br />

Coordinator of the Working Team works is Mr Davit Darsavelidze.<br />

This group is also a part of the Interdepartmental Team.<br />

The Interdepartmental Team is a group having a consulting and conceptual character. It consists of<br />

members of individual Departments of Meria – the experts on the areas that are crucial for the growth<br />

of the City. The team is responsible for the Plan merits.<br />

The Interdepartmental Team consists of people working in the following Meria departments:<br />

− Economic Policy Agency<br />

− Finance Agency<br />

− Municipal Improvement Agency<br />

− Property Management Agency<br />

− Urban Planning Agency<br />

− Transport Agency<br />

− Social Service & Culture Agency<br />

− Waste Management Agency<br />

− Health & Social Affairs Agency<br />

− Emergency Agency<br />

− Citizenship & Integration Agency<br />

− “Tbilisi Water” Ltd. (Municipal Enterprise)<br />

− “Metropolitan” Ltd. (Municipal Enterprise)<br />

The Interdepartmental team has also been joined by the administration workers from individual parts<br />

of Tbilisi:<br />

− Isani-Samgori<br />

− Didube-Chughureti<br />

− Gdani-Nadzaladevi<br />

− Vake-Saburtalo<br />

− Didgori<br />

− Old Tbilisi<br />

35


The Coordinator of the Team works is Mr Zviad Archuadze, the Director of Economic Policy Agency<br />

Social Council – consists of leaders of social/professional groups and heads of institutions,<br />

businesses and organisations that are important to the City. The Council plays a specific role – as a<br />

matter of fact it is an opinion-making body, so its members cannot be appointed at random. The<br />

Council’s structure should be an extension of the Interdepartmental Team.<br />

2.. <strong>PLAN</strong> PREPARATION PHASES – FIRST EDITION<br />

Phase one – Organisation of teams and adoption of the procedure<br />

• Appointing the Working Team<br />

• Appointing the Interdepartmental Team<br />

• Appointing the Council of City and Commune Development<br />

• Appointing the group of consultants<br />

• Adopting the Plan preparation procedure<br />

• Recognising techniques and tools to carry out works<br />

• Adopting a detailed timetable of the Plan preparation<br />

Phase two – The assessment of the development and competitiveness level of the City being a<br />

centre of business activity that offers high quality of life to its residents.<br />

• Collecting and analysing data about the present situation and perspectives of local development,<br />

including a survey of local businesses,<br />

• The analysis of the City situation in key areas,<br />

• The analysis of the City Development Strategy implementation process,<br />

• Writing reports about the analyses,<br />

• Writing the SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis, the identification of<br />

key problems and defining the development priorities.<br />

Phase three – the Plan preparation<br />

• Selection of the priorities and developing the Local Development Plan,<br />

• Defining the Plan implementation indices (of its product, result and impact) being the basis of the<br />

strategy implementation monitoring system,<br />

• Deciding on the material scope of the Plan, including an initial list of the strategic implementation<br />

projects.<br />

Phase four – Preparing the Plan document, consultations and final approval.<br />

• Defining the rules, procedures and tools for the works on the Plan,<br />

• Collecting the implementation projects, their evaluation and selection,<br />

• Developing the draft Plan document,<br />

• Presentation, consultations and modifications of the draft,<br />

• Passing the resolution by The City Council<br />

36


3. METHODOLOGY OF UPDATING THE <strong>LOCAL</strong> <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong><br />

Passing the Local Development Plan for Tbilisi, which is a document of strategic character, does not<br />

end the cooperation among partners involved in its implementation.<br />

Basic elements of the updating<br />

The Working and Interdepartmental teams and the City Social Council in a natural way take over the<br />

responsibility for the implementation of the Plan and for its updating. In the updating process the<br />

Council is the main opinion-making body for the Mayor and The City Council.<br />

The terms of accurate Plan updating largely determine formal and organisational tasks and the<br />

characteristic features of the Plan as well as the ways the Plan is developed:<br />

• its progressive character – updated annually,<br />

• works of the Plan documented on standard forms,<br />

• clear and carefully chosen criteria of the implementation projects selection,<br />

• application of IT tools to create and update bases of social and business data,<br />

• sensitivity to changes in the social and economic situation and in legal regulations,<br />

• stability of procedures, tools, teams (Teams, the Council), extensive consultation.<br />

Cyclical activities<br />

Updating is performed every year – although, obviously, not all the data change on the annual basis.<br />

Phase I<br />

The cycle starts with collecting information about the level of social and economic growth, the strategy<br />

implementation as well as about the accompanying phenomena. Additionally, surveys are conducted<br />

in the social and business groups. It is obvious that the more data is collected, the more effective<br />

further activities will be. At this stage it is important to decide the length of the cycle at which specific<br />

data will be collected. Also, the sources of the data should be identified.<br />

Phase II<br />

As in case of every strategic programming, the next activity deals with the strengths, weaknesses,<br />

opportunities and external threats the City has to face. It is a task that requires from the<br />

Interdepartmental Team members plenty of effort, effectiveness as well as professional expertise.<br />

The natural outcome of this analysis is the identification of problems that are of key importance for the<br />

growth of Tbilisi. Then the conceptual work commences in order to find out how these problems can<br />

be solved and thus to define the priorities. These activities are performed by the Interdepartmental<br />

Team and the Social Council of the City who defines the local development directions and<br />

recommends development priorities to the Mayor.<br />

Before the priorities are approved, the mayor consults them with the City Council commissions and<br />

with chosen organisations.<br />

Phase III<br />

Afterwards the consultations the adopted priorities are disseminated, which is the signal for the<br />

organisations to send in proposals of implementation projects within the frameworks of the adopted<br />

priorities. It is important that the priority development directions are announced in an appropriate way<br />

because the information about them should reach all the entities and public administration offices,<br />

organisations and institutions interested in implementation of various projects concerning these<br />

priorities. The proposals of implementation projects are submitted on standard forms to the Working<br />

Team. The Working Team’s task is to compare these proposals. Then, the Interdepartmental Team<br />

evaluates and selects them. The Team first of all takes into consideration the effectiveness of the<br />

proposals in implementing the adopted priorities. Another criterion is how well the implementation<br />

projects have been prepared. The projects that most effectively address the priorities are put on a<br />

37


short list out of which the best, strategic projects are selected. Then, after consultations with the City<br />

council, the Mayor finally approves and announces the winning projects.<br />

Phase IV<br />

The announcement of the list of the approved strategic projects is a signal for applicants to write their<br />

applications using standard forms. The use of standard forms make it possible to assess the projects<br />

by comparing their basic features and to remain impartial. The applications are reviewed by the<br />

Interdepartmental team who eventually qualifies these projects that lead to the completion of the Draft<br />

Local Development Plan for Tbilisi that is based on the adopted priorities. As a result it qualifies such<br />

projects that will contribute to forging the Draft Local Development Plan. The final version of the Plan<br />

is developed by the Plan Working Team.<br />

As a consequence of these works the Mayor consults various organisations and submits the Plan to<br />

the City Council for approval. The implementation of the Plan is a great challenge for all the<br />

participants of the process; its progress is monitored and systematically adjusted to the occurring<br />

changes or force majeure.<br />

The calendar of activities<br />

Each consecutive cycle starts with the evaluation and with the collection of data about social and<br />

economic situation of the City, then all the above mentioned activities are repeated. Professional<br />

evaluation of the situation not only facilitates the identification of key problems that may occur in the<br />

next Plan edition, but also defines the needs of the opinion-making groups. Right analysis<br />

conclusions (survey, statistical data analysis) make it possible to choose the best ways of public<br />

intervention.<br />

As it has been mentioned, the Local Development Plans should be written in yearly cycles. When<br />

choosing the starting dates of works, it is important to remember about the City and Commune<br />

budget procedure and the reporting deadlines. One of the key elements is to agree upon the final<br />

dates of applications to financial institutions and organisations that deal with financing the<br />

implementation projects.<br />

.<br />

38


COMPETENCE DISTRIBUTION IN THE PROCESS OF CREATING AND UPDATING THE <strong>LOCAL</strong> <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong><br />

The Plan Working Team The Plan Interdepartmental Team The Social Council<br />

Main task<br />

Full technical and organisational service during<br />

the Plan preparation<br />

The Team members should gradually overtake<br />

the role of external consultants and become the<br />

main body that manages the Plan.<br />

Detailed tasks<br />

• To collect and analyse information necessary<br />

for the assessment of the situation of the City<br />

and for reaching the development strategy<br />

goals,<br />

• To build and run data bases necessary to<br />

manage the City growth,<br />

• To hold meetings, write programmes and<br />

material packets for the meetings,<br />

• To take minutes at the meetings<br />

• To collect other information necessary for the<br />

Plan development, e.g. about the effectiveness<br />

of similar or already tested solutions,<br />

• To participate in all the meetings of other<br />

bodies where the Plan is discussed,<br />

• To organise and participate in the process of<br />

creating the Plan,<br />

• To define the scope of possible cooperation<br />

with the consultants.<br />

To identify key problems and decide on the<br />

Plan concept; to present the Plan to the<br />

Council and other organisations<br />

• To review materials prepared by the<br />

Working team and the consultants,<br />

• To conduct a SWOT analysis<br />

• To identify and recommend the key<br />

problems, the Plan priorities and the<br />

strategic projects to the Social Council of<br />

Tbilisi,<br />

• To approve the draft Plan and to present<br />

the Plan to the Social Council,<br />

• To participate in the process of<br />

consultation and approval.<br />

To review key problems of social and<br />

economic situation of the City, to select<br />

priorities and adopt the final version of the<br />

Plan<br />

• To participate in the Plan development<br />

through the analysis and evaluation of the<br />

reports concerning the process,<br />

• To select priorities around which the Plan<br />

activities will be structured,<br />

• To discuss the draft Plan , to present<br />

opinion about it and to recommend<br />

possible modifications,<br />

• To present and consult the Plan in their<br />

environments,<br />

• To approve the final version of the Plan,<br />

• To present the Plan to the City Council.<br />

39


4. THE TIMETABLE OF WORKS ON THE <strong>LOCAL</strong> <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong><br />

THE TIMETABLE OF THE PROCESS OF UPDATING AND IMPLEMENTING THE <strong>LOCAL</strong> <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong> – A<br />

YEARLY CYCLE<br />

PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III PHASE IV<br />

The assessment of the level of<br />

social and economic growth in<br />

Tbilisi and of the City<br />

Development Strategy<br />

implementation<br />

Identification of the key problems<br />

and defining the priorities of<br />

development<br />

Collecting proposed<br />

implementation projects;<br />

making a shortlist; final<br />

selection of the strategic<br />

projects<br />

Preparing applications of<br />

strategic projects<br />

Development and approval of the<br />

draft Local Development Plan<br />

• The report describing the<br />

current social and economic<br />

situation – in all areas of the<br />

City life; Highlighting the<br />

changes in relation to the<br />

previous edition of the report<br />

(last year report),<br />

• Information about the level of<br />

implementation of the City<br />

Development Strategy,<br />

• The description of new<br />

phenomena; entering related<br />

data to the base; Expanding<br />

and improving the system of<br />

data base application.<br />

• The assessment of the Plan<br />

implementation in the previous<br />

year,<br />

• The assessment of data<br />

resulting from the report;<br />

highlighting the trends and<br />

deviations; the SWOT analysis,<br />

• Identifying key problems;<br />

defining activity priorities;<br />

adopting the Plan<br />

implementation indicators,<br />

• Recommending priorities, their<br />

consultation and approval,<br />

• Announcing the priorities,<br />

• Collecting the proposed<br />

Plan implementation<br />

projects on special<br />

standard forms,<br />

• The evaluation, and<br />

selection of the projects;<br />

deciding if they conform<br />

with the Plan priorities,<br />

• Choosing the projects of<br />

the greatest importance –<br />

the set of strategic<br />

projects,<br />

• Announcing the final list of<br />

these projects.<br />

• Development of the strategic<br />

projects with the use of<br />

special standard forms,<br />

• Forging the draft Local<br />

development Plan,<br />

• Submitting it to the selected<br />

organisations for consultation<br />

and approval; introducing<br />

possible modifications; the<br />

approval,<br />

• Presenting the Plan to the<br />

City Council with a view of<br />

passing the suitable<br />

resolution.<br />

• Announcing the new invitation<br />

to tender projects for the new<br />

edition of the Plan.<br />

to 15 March to 30 April to 31 August to 15 December<br />

40


5. CRITERIA OF SELECTING PROJECTS <strong>FOR</strong> THE <strong>PLAN</strong><br />

In the process of developing the Plan the proposed projects need to be assessed. The teams<br />

participating in the process of writing the Plan are responsible for the evaluation of the projects from<br />

the technical and subject-matter point of view. The subject-matter analysis indicates those projects<br />

that will contribute the most to reaching the projected goals.<br />

The subject-matter assessment will be carried out in two stages:<br />

- the first stage leading to the decision which priorities are the most important,<br />

- the second stage, defining how individual project will contribute to reaching the adopted priorities.<br />

The Interdepartmental and Working Teams decide about the importance of each priority, marking<br />

them from 1 to 6.<br />

On the second stage each of the projects will be related to the priorities by another mark, from 0 to 3.<br />

The scale of assessing the projects depending on how they meet the priorities (from 0 to 3 points)<br />

reflects the following assumptions:<br />

0 – the project is not related to the priorities whatsoever;<br />

1 – there is a weak link between the project and the priority,<br />

2 – the project will significantly improve on a micro scale (locally, temporarily, in relation to a specific<br />

group of beneficiaries) the present situation in the priority area,<br />

3 – the project will significantly improve the situation in the priority area throughout the whole city.<br />

41


<strong>LOCAL</strong><br />

<strong>ECONOMIC</strong><br />

<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />

<strong>PLAN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>TBILISI</strong><br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

<strong>LED</strong> STRATEGY DRAFT<br />

Tbilisi City Hall │ Economic Policy Agency<br />

Address: 2, Liberty Sq │ Tbilisi 0105, Georgia<br />

Tel.:(+99532)932314 │ Fax.:(+99532)932895<br />

E-Mail: economic@tbilisi.gov.ge<br />

www.tbilisi.gov.ge


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 5<br />

1. Cities matter ............................................................................................................................................. 6<br />

1.1. Cities are key centers of new economy.............................................................................................. 6<br />

1.2. Role of cities for national economy..................................................................................................... 8<br />

1.3. Role of Tbilisi in Georgia in region .................................................................................................... 10<br />

2. Cities compete with other locations.................................................................................................... 13<br />

2.1. City competitiveness......................................................................................................................... 13<br />

2.2. Factors of competitiveness............................................................................................................... 14<br />

2.3. Assessment of Tbilisi competitiveness ............................................................................................. 16<br />

3. New dimension of city policies ( on the way to knowledge base economy) .................................. 20<br />

3.1. Skilled workforce............................................................................................................................... 20<br />

3.2. Clusters ............................................................................................................................................ 21<br />

3.3. Start ups ........................................................................................................................................... 25<br />

3.4. Quality of place................................................................................................................................. 26<br />

3.5. Tbilisi territorial structure................................................................................................................... 27<br />

3.5.1. Basic historical stages............................................................................................................... 27<br />

3.5.2. Spatial structure ........................................................................................................................ 28<br />

3.5.3. New trends of Tbilisi city functional-spatial development under new social-economic conditions29<br />

3.6. Allocation of new development projects ........................................................................................... 31<br />

4. Tbilisi economy ..................................................................................................................................... 34<br />

4.1. Economic active population.............................................................................................................. 34<br />

4.2. Employment ..................................................................................................................................... 35<br />

4.3. Number of firms by sector................................................................................................................. 37<br />

4.4. Turnover in business sector.............................................................................................................. 38<br />

4.5. Earnings ........................................................................................................................................... 40<br />

4.6. General data of external trade .......................................................................................................... 42<br />

2


4.7. Key industries of Tbilisi economy...................................................................................................... 44<br />

4.8. Identification of key problems facing City of Tbilisi economy ........................................................... 49<br />

5. Vision...................................................................................................................................................... 50<br />

6. Strategic directions ............................................................................................................................... 52<br />

7. Strategy implementation....................................................................................................................... 62<br />

8. Strategy monitoring .............................................................................................................................. 64<br />

3


CHARTS<br />

Chart 1-1 Tbilisi in the region SWOT analysis ................................................................................................................................................................11<br />

Chart 2-1 City of Kutaisi SWOT analysis.....................................................................................................................................................................18<br />

Chart 2-2 City of Rustavi SWOT analysis...................................................................................................................................................................18<br />

Chart 2-3 City of Batumi SWOT analysis....................................................................................................................................................................19<br />

Chart 4-1 Employed in business sector by regions........................................................................................................................................................35<br />

Chart 4-2 Turnover in business sector by regions in 2006 ...........................................................................................................................................38<br />

Chart 4-3 Volume of turnover per employee in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi............................................................................................39<br />

Chart 4-4 Average monthly earnings in business sector by regions in 2006.............................................................................................................40<br />

Chart 4-5 Turnover and employment in hotels in regions in 2006...............................................................................................................................44<br />

Chart 4-6 Turnover and employment in construction in regions in 2006...................................................................................................................45<br />

Chart 4-7 Turnover and employment in enterprises of trade in regions in 2006......................................................................................................46<br />

Chart 4-8 Turnover and employment in Industry in regions in 2006 ..........................................................................................................................47<br />

TABLES<br />

Table 2-1 City of Tbilisi in the country, assessment results 17<br />

Table 3-1 The employed by type of activity. 20<br />

Table 3-2 Number of new registered entities by regions 25<br />

Table 3-3 Number of new businesses by sector in Tbilisi. 25<br />

Table 4-1 Employment in Tbilisi 36<br />

Table 4-2 Structure of employment In Tbilisi 36<br />

Table 4-3 Number of registered entities by kind of economic activity (by the end of year; unit). 37<br />

Table 4-4 Number of registered entities by districts of Tbilisi 37<br />

Table 4-5 Turnover in business sector in mln GEL 38<br />

Table 4-6 Turnover in business sector and employment 39<br />

Table 4-7 Earnings in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi 40<br />

Table 4-8 Average monthly wages in sectors 41<br />

Table 4-9 Georgian external trade 42<br />

Table 4-10 External trade by groups of countries 42<br />

Table 4-11 Commodity positions by exports and import in 2006 43<br />

Table 6-1 Programs and projects of strategic direction – Booming regional gateway 53<br />

Table 6-2 Programs and projects of strategic direction – Time for business 55<br />

Table 6-3 Programs and projects of strategic direction – A place to live 57<br />

Table 6-4 Programs and projects of strategic direction – The hospitable city 59<br />

Table 6-5 Programs and projects of strategic direction – People empower Tbilisi 61<br />

4


Introduction<br />

Tbilisi represents important industrial, social and cultural center of East Europe and<br />

Caucasus region and, at the dawn of the millennium, is becoming one of the most<br />

important transportation links for global energy carriers, information flows and trade<br />

projects.<br />

The construction of the Kars (Turkey)-Tbilisi-Baku (Azerbaijan) 826-kilometer railway will<br />

probably be the most significant project in the entire Caucasus and could bring<br />

tremendous economic dividends to the region and international economy. The railway line<br />

has huge potential to deepen the integration of Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan, which, in<br />

turn, will link them more closely with Europe and Asia.<br />

In the Soviet era Tbilisi and Georgia were a part of centrally planned socialist economy.<br />

Transportation system, cooperation networks, trade links were mainly developed within<br />

internal Soviet market. And the country’s contacts with the rest of the world, including<br />

transportation infrastructure, were led through the Soviet Union. Political reasons and<br />

missing appropriate infrastructure not only stopped Georgia from the relations with<br />

partners from outside the USSR but, due to the supremacy of central institutions, also<br />

hindered bilateral contacts between the republics.<br />

As a result of the political changes in the region transportation channels across Northern<br />

Caucasus and Russia are closed.<br />

Presently Georgia and Tbilisi are re-establishing their traditional central role on the route<br />

from Asia to Europe. Not only does it require reconstructing economic and cultural links<br />

but it is also vitally important to invest in transportation sector. Investments in the sea<br />

harbours of Baku and Poti, the airport in Tbilisi and Baku, pipelines from Azerbaijan via<br />

Tbilisi to Turkey, new road and railway connections from Tbilisi to Turkey and Baku will<br />

integrate Georgia and Tbilisi into transit services and help rebuild natural cooperation<br />

bonds.<br />

By January 1, 2006, population of Tbilisi amounted to 1093 thousand, 15.2% of Tbilisi<br />

population is ethnically non-Georgians. The major non-Georgian ethnic groups are<br />

Armenians, Russians, Azeri and Sestinas.<br />

Tbilisi represents multi-functional administrational, industrial and cultural-educational<br />

centre of Georgia.<br />

At the beginning of 2007 Tbilisi significantly expanded its territory incorporating suburban<br />

areas. As a result, more housing and commercial land appeared on the market, which is<br />

of key importance for the growth of Tbilisi metropolitan area.<br />

5


1. Cities matter<br />

1.1. Cities are key centers of new economy<br />

Transformation of an industrial town into a post-industrial city is a long-lasting and<br />

complex process. The examples of cities that have already undergone this process offer<br />

experience that is worth using when working on Tbilisi economic development plan.<br />

In the process of transformation three phases can be distinguished:<br />

• crisis of a traditional industrial town,<br />

• attracting foreign investors to the city,<br />

• inward development based on unique identity and own resources.<br />

The phases can overlap and their duration cannot be determined in advance. The<br />

intensity and directions of changes depend on the local actors, their cooperation and<br />

capability to implement plans.<br />

The first phase include:<br />

• a substantial amount of workforce is made redundant in industry sector,<br />

• entrepreneurs set up service and trading companies that do not require much<br />

capital,<br />

• deprivation of industrial districts,<br />

• deprivation of housing districts with low skilled communities,<br />

• development of informal sector,<br />

• education sector have no clear perspectives and teaching standards in new<br />

professions.<br />

Finding foreign investors make it possible to introduce to the economy the elements that<br />

in the first phase are available locally, such as:<br />

• capital,<br />

• new technologies in production and management,<br />

• new standards of employees’ recruitment,<br />

• new cooperation links with other national economies,<br />

• new products that are competitive on global markets.<br />

6


It is hard to overestimate those benefits for the city economy that are generated by foreign<br />

investors, but we should not forget that the reasons why those firm invest in our cit must<br />

be thoroughly analysed. It will help us to take maximum advantage of these investments<br />

and prevent disappointment if our expectations are unrealistic.<br />

Foreign firms invest in order to:<br />

• lower the production costs,<br />

• increase the value of the invested capital,<br />

• enter new markets,<br />

• gain access to resources that are out of reach where they have been operating so<br />

far.<br />

In a longer perspective these companies transfer their business activity to new locations<br />

that provide them with better business environment.<br />

For a long-term competitiveness of the city economy the third phase is of key importance.<br />

It is based on endogenic potentials and the city identity.<br />

The development of local businesses also leads to new quality of cooperation with foreign<br />

investors who invest their capital not only to benefit from the consumption potential of the<br />

local market and from lower production costs, but are also interested in finding new<br />

partners who will give them access to better solutions. It means that financial relations<br />

change too – the investor not only bears the costs of their business activity, but also<br />

shares their profits with a local partner.<br />

In the second half of the 20th century the economy of Tbilisi was based on industrial<br />

plants producing for the demand of the Soviet Union market. Cooperation links, legal<br />

regulations, transport infrastructure and business environment were oriented at satisfying<br />

the needs of this type of economy, therefore the change of production profile of entering<br />

new markets were hardly possible.<br />

After the collapse of the Soviet Union and, consequently, of the centrally managed<br />

economy many manufacturing firms in Tbilisi lost their markets and either closed down or<br />

reduced their employment and production. The system reform, introduction of market<br />

economy and opening to new markets resulted in a thorough transformation of Tbilisi<br />

economy.<br />

Although some positive effects can be observed, the transformation process is long and<br />

generates serious social problems and costs. In order to understand the ongoing<br />

changes, we cannot view the problem as merely a systematic one. The economy of Tbilisi<br />

is also influenced by other economic transformation factors that do not happen only in the<br />

post-communist countries, but are observed all over the world. These factors are:<br />

• globalisation and increasingly free flow of knowledge and ideas, capital, products<br />

and services as well as people among the regions and cities of the world,<br />

• the use of new technology by businesses, state and local governments as well as<br />

by ordinary people,<br />

• cultural changes in the family model and life aspirations of the young generation.<br />

7


Due to the overlapping effects of regained independence and system transformation on<br />

the other three universal processes both Georgia and Tbilisi are facing a great challenge.<br />

Public officials as well as entrepreneurs and ordinary residents of Tbilisi must understand<br />

the ongoing changes and their implications in order to take a maximum advantage of new<br />

opportunities. They have to reduce the social costs to minimum and concentrate their<br />

resources in the areas where the perspectives of growth are the most promising.<br />

In order to strengthen the foundations of Georgia’s and Tbilisi’s new economic position<br />

and to maximise the effects of the transformation system, it is vital to introduce the<br />

following changes and reforms:<br />

1. The deep reform of Georgian economy resulted in the fact that environment<br />

regulators can facilitate establishing and running business on the terms equal to those<br />

in the developed countries with market economy.<br />

2. Building new transport and telecommunication infrastructures, that will connect<br />

Georgia with the partners in the region and in the world, will make it possible to export<br />

and import goods and services.<br />

3. The reform of the education system and introducing the culture of life long learning to<br />

instruct skilled workforce according to the standards of the global job market.<br />

4. Investments in technical infrastructure and the city revitalisation make Tbilisi an<br />

attractive place to live and do business.<br />

1.2. Role of cities for national economy<br />

City are the more and more powerful engines of the national and global economy. Two<br />

key forces - the globalization and the commercialization of new information as well as<br />

communications technologies - have been driving the massive changes and thus<br />

restructuring cities. Globalization is linked to liberalized trade and the opening up of world<br />

markets through organizations and agreements such as the Word Trade Organization or<br />

the European Union. Global corporations continue to expand their role on the world stage<br />

through expansion, mergers and acquisitions.<br />

Globalization would not be possible if there had not been for the explosion of new<br />

information technologies with mobile wireless communication, personal computers, and<br />

networks of internet, intranet and extranet. All of these have made it possible to manage<br />

facilities distributed around the world, for the labour to move more freely across national<br />

boundaries, and for the information, currencies and transactions to flow smoothly to any<br />

destination. As globalization proceeds, regional and national economies become more<br />

closely intertwined. National boundaries have gradually become less relevant as<br />

globalization and information technology have reduced the role of the nation state. Big<br />

metropolises with skilled workforce, globally connected businesses have emerged as the<br />

engines of the new economy.<br />

Globalization, and intensive competition which is integral to it, has led to a massive<br />

restructuring of regional economies. The widespread de-industrialization of cities,<br />

particularly of urban cores, is clear evidence of this. As the global marketplace expands,<br />

each city is forced to focus upon the few things that it is very good at, in which it can<br />

successfully compete at a global scale.<br />

8


This more recent phase of economic restructuring has been characterized by a<br />

transformation to a knowledge economy. The future quality of life in advanced economies<br />

depends on upgrading and moving the economy towards a concentration in high value<br />

added activities from any industry. The key is to focus on the high order, innovation<br />

based, high productivity activities in each industry. The quality of life and economic<br />

development, depend on making a successful transition to a knowledge economy.<br />

Unlike an economy based on traditional manufacturing and natural resource extraction, in<br />

which factors such as access to raw materials may have played a central role, the<br />

knowledge economy is driven by:<br />

• well educated and high-skilled workforce,<br />

• innovation – creativity, flexibility, research and development,<br />

• entrepreneurship – mentoring, networking, strategic alliances,<br />

• information and communications technology (ICT).<br />

The knowledge economy is present in all segments of our society and our economy. It is<br />

not confined to certain groups, such as university graduates, or certain industries, such as<br />

information technology or telecommunications. Rather, the knowledge economy<br />

represents a way of life and a way of producing goods and services that focus on<br />

continuous improvement of the above characteristics. Even “traditional” industries, can be,<br />

or rather should be, a part of the knowledge-based economy. Today successful<br />

companies in older industries employ high quality design and flexible advanced<br />

manufacturing.<br />

Cities have always been areas of growth, the places where economic resources,<br />

entrepreneurship, and a diverse population provided natural opportunity for starting new<br />

economic, cultural and intellectual activities. Cities have always fostered the creativity that<br />

produces technological advancements and new forms of commercial organizations. There<br />

are a lot of good examples in the last century of the power of cities to create new<br />

technological and commercial innovations, as a result of combined activities of<br />

entrepreneurs, artists and technicians congregated in these places. What we are<br />

witnessing now in successful North American and European cities is the concurrence of<br />

cultural and technological creativity that drive the new economy. The multi-media<br />

industries that have exploded in several places are example of this creative convergence.<br />

There is an assortment of specific conditions that exist in cities and which make them a<br />

fertile ground for innovation, creativity, and technological and commercial advancement.<br />

The most important thing that cities can offer is the diverse pool of skilled labour required<br />

to make large-scale and specialized production possible. Secondly, because of their size<br />

cities should offer local markets of sufficient size for specialized goods and services to be<br />

developed. Thirdly, because of their geographical conditions and the enhanced possibility<br />

for formal and informal contacts of all kinds, cities are places where technology and knowhow<br />

can spill over. Information flows easily, and chance encounters can bring together<br />

diverse interests and expertise to create new products and services.<br />

In this context, urban arts and cultural amenities - including not only formal events and<br />

places such as galleries, music halls or museums, but also the vitality of its more informal<br />

amenities like restaurants, street cafés, bookstores and outdoor festivals - becomes<br />

tangible assets that play a role in fostering creativity and innovation.<br />

9


Cities combine diversity – of population and resources of all kinds. Unique assets show<br />

the innovative capacity and the bunch of possibilities of each city. Under today’s economic<br />

conditions, in the global knowledge economy that is driven by information, creativity,<br />

innovation and technology, when cities are at centre stage, these special urban<br />

characteristic are of the biggest importance.<br />

The elimination, and in some places even the reduction, of national trade barriers has<br />

brought us to the moment when either people or businesses are choosing to locate and<br />

expand in cities that have the mix of economic, social, political and other attributes for long<br />

term success. As a result of urban renaissance we are witnessing the rapid growth of<br />

many North American and European cities. Urban-based industries are the fast-growth<br />

industries, people are moving back to cities and central governments are commencing<br />

massive urban regeneration schemes. It more and more widely recognized that cities are<br />

the focal points of national economies and should follow through with proactive urban<br />

regeneration strategies and investment funding.<br />

1.3. Role of Tbilisi in Georgia in region<br />

Tbilisi in the region<br />

After the collapse of the Soviet Union Georgia is regaining its traditional role in the region.<br />

The country is situated along the transport links connecting Asia with Europe and Tbilisi<br />

plays the role of service centre influencing Caucasus and the neighboring regions. In the<br />

regional exchange Tbilisi tries to become the central point of:<br />

• economic life with advanced services where the most competitive business of the<br />

region operate from,<br />

• political life with the head offices of international organizations and donor<br />

organizations operating in the region,<br />

• education and research that attract young people from the whole region,<br />

• culture and sport with the most important sports and cultural events in the region,<br />

• tourist industry with the largest number of visitors.<br />

The list of Tbilisi competitors in the region includes the cities of Ukraine, Turkey, Russia,<br />

Azerbaijan, Armenia and the countries of central Asia that aspire to the position of the<br />

regional service centre.<br />

Due to the political situation there are no cooperation links in the region and, therefore,<br />

Tbilisi has no competition in Northern Caucasus as well as in the neighbouring parts of<br />

Russia. Moreover, none of the Ukrainian cities attempts to play an active role in Caucasus<br />

so there is no alternative for Tbilisi.<br />

Despite dynamic economic exchange with Turkey, in its eastern part there are no strong<br />

urban centres that could be able to compete with Tbilisi.<br />

That leaves us with Baku and Erevan, the capital cities of Azerbaijan and Armenia as<br />

Tbilisi’s natural and historical rivals. In Central Asia it is Kazakhstan with its strong political<br />

and economic position that boasts the role of a regional leader. Its authorities, businesses<br />

and organisations are very active and have achieved the position of an important<br />

economic partner as well as the key investors in the region.<br />

10


Kazakh cities, mainly Astana and Alma-Ata, are likely to become regional centres that<br />

influence neighbouring countries and attract investors, events and people. Numerous<br />

investments in Astana and the plans of further local development make the city a regional<br />

leader. Also, the historical, institutional and demographic potential of Alma-Ata positions<br />

this city as another significant competition in the region. The political, social and economic<br />

situation in other countries of Central Asia results in the limited potential of other cities in<br />

the region, so they cannot threaten the leading position of Tbilisi. Therefore, the cities<br />

eventually included in the comparative analysis were Astana, Alma-Ata, Baku and<br />

Erevan.<br />

The City team and the consultants carried out the SWOT analysis of Tbilisi, relating its<br />

position in the region to Astana, Alma-Ata, Baku and Erevan.<br />

By means of the SWOT competitive assessment in the system of coordinates the X axis<br />

(horizontal) the strengths and opportunities of Tbilisi were placed. Taking into<br />

consideration the time factor and analysing the prospective changes that are likely to<br />

happen in Tbilisi and in its rival cities the areas of threats and opportunities were placed<br />

on the Y axis (vertical).<br />

Tbilisi in the region<br />

Chart 1-1 Tbilisi in the region SWOT analysis<br />

OPPORTUNITIES<br />

quality of life<br />

transport and<br />

telecommunication accessibility<br />

skilled workforce<br />

technical<br />

infrastructure<br />

cost of doing<br />

business<br />

institutional infrastructure<br />

legal regulation<br />

and policy<br />

economic<br />

demographic<br />

structure<br />

city recognition<br />

Weaknesses<br />

networking<br />

social diversity<br />

Strengths<br />

R&D<br />

THREATS<br />

11


While assessing the present condition of the elementary city competitiveness factors with<br />

a view to its weak and strong points the team pointed out a particularly weak position of<br />

the Research and development sector and the highly unattractive traditional structure of<br />

local economy. The team found that the capacity to start cooperation links and networking<br />

as well as the accessibility of funds are slightly more satisfying but still poor. Also, the<br />

qualifications of workforce, technical and institutional infrastructure, transport accessibility,<br />

social diversity and the quality of life need to be improved.<br />

In most cases the prospects of improvement were observed. The best opportunities are<br />

likely to be observed in the quality of life and the transport and telecommunications<br />

accessibility. The areas facing the most significant threats are R&D, networking and the<br />

groups threatened by social exclusion of those who do not participate in economic and<br />

life.<br />

The demographic situation was assessed on a medium level. As for strong points of the<br />

city, legal regulations, state policies and the city recognition were ranked the highest.<br />

Other strong points included the costs of doing business, which were most likely to<br />

improve, and the institutional infrastructure. Further reforms will make it possible to<br />

improve legal framework. Ambitious plans of other cities may threaten the recognition of<br />

Tbilisi as the regional centre.<br />

In conclusion, it was pointed out that public intervention is necessary to support the<br />

development of R&D, networking, the city recognition, workforce skills, availability of<br />

financial resources and technical infrastructure. With regard to the technical infrastructure<br />

it seems necessary to expand space for business activities, i.e. to developed land for<br />

industrial, logistic and office activities with full infrastructure for services. Special attention<br />

was paid to meeting the requirements of start-ups, mainly to regulations that make<br />

establishing a business cheaper and less time-consuming.<br />

12


2. Cities compete with other locations<br />

2.1. City competitiveness<br />

Cities are now competing at both a national and international level to attract investment,<br />

citizens as well as visitors.<br />

Where globalization has had a positive effect in stimulating economic growth, these<br />

benefits have not been evenly distributed. Cities therefore continue to experience<br />

problems of poverty and inequality. In developing cities these problems are compounded<br />

by urbanization which has led to problems of unemployment, the proliferation of informal<br />

settlements and environmental degradation. All cities have to face challenges because of:<br />

1. economy transformation from the traditional to new knowledge based economy<br />

2. limited revenue capacity of companies, citizens and local governments<br />

3. movement of people and businesses<br />

4. suburbanization and poverty in central areas<br />

5. need of new education following workforce development demand<br />

Transformation require efficient management to follow all changes, to face challenges and<br />

to utilize resources efficiently. It's universally known that better performing cities and those<br />

recognized as skilfully managed are more attractive for new businesses. Although there<br />

is a lack of comparative standards with which to measure whether a city is well<br />

performing and assess key drivers of high performance, it is obvious that ability to cope<br />

with change, leadership and vision shown by city representatives, its economic, social and<br />

cultural diversity as well as its ability to make effective use of human capital are the<br />

conditioning foundations of high performing city.<br />

The fact that some sectors achieve a critical mass in a city may be more important than<br />

the location of a city itself. Modern cities in global position in the research and<br />

commercialization of new technologies are not based on its location but on the fact that<br />

this sector demonstrates a high degree of clustering and innovation, which makes the city<br />

attractive to the others.<br />

There are some obstacles on the way to a well managed competitive city that should be<br />

taken into a count:<br />

1. the importance of developing effective metropolitan policies and engaging in long term<br />

spatial planning,<br />

2. new strategies require strong civic leadership and vision to convince public to<br />

changes,<br />

3. weak citizen participation is a current and future problem and may result in declining<br />

identification with governance structures and policies,<br />

4. coordination and cooperation between different levels (region, neighbourhood) ,<br />

sectors and partners (public, private and community organizations or decision<br />

makers, professionals and stakeholders),<br />

5. the question how far local government should be involved in local economy.<br />

13


These and other important issues should be discussed with a local stakeholders at the<br />

beginning when the framework is constructed. The agreement will create boundaries for<br />

all policies and define public role in city development activities.<br />

2.2. Factors of competitiveness<br />

City competitiveness can be defined as the ability to attract and retain citizens, investment<br />

and good quality work places as well as visitors. It is no less important to support city<br />

economy in such a way that city products keep strong position on international markets.<br />

As we continue to move towards a global knowledge economy, the competitive playing<br />

field has shifted dramatically. City-regions are now competing with one another:<br />

• to attract skilled labor;<br />

• to attract new investment and quality jobs;<br />

• for their share of global markets in the city’s export cluster.<br />

In a global knowledge economy, skilled labor, investment and jobs are increasingly<br />

mobile. They can move relatively easily across national boundaries, and between cities.<br />

Products and services compete globally. Sales of these products and services can<br />

generate added value, income, investment and jobs in the region in which they are<br />

produced. It means that cities should build on their strengths. Notably, they can create<br />

partnerships and employment and innovation pacts, bringing together key players within<br />

an area – elected representatives, business leaders, NGOs, interest groups and<br />

universities – to engage in positive and dynamic social and economic development.<br />

Cities should tackle their weaknesses, boosting employability among those groups within<br />

the population which find it hardest to access employment. In some cases, cities compete<br />

directly with other cities for market share, as in the tourism industry, where the character,<br />

attractions and events compete directly to attract tourists and their money. In other cases,<br />

the role of cities in supporting the competitiveness of their exports is more indirect.<br />

As globalization proceeds, cities continue to take centre stage in the global economic<br />

theatre. The relationship between cities is primarily one of intense competition. Ultimately,<br />

a sustained or improved quality of life in particular metropolises depends upon its ability to<br />

compete successfully with other cities and to provide the necessary economic foundations<br />

for growth. Competitive businesses and industries create jobs for residents and labor<br />

force, and assessment revenue for the city that allows it to provide a range of social,<br />

community, physical and other services and programs.<br />

Cities often naturally provide a stimulating environment for innovation and businesses to<br />

flourish and there are steps they can take to further foster this environment. The added<br />

value of city-level actions is that they have more information on the specificities of the<br />

business environment and are able to carry out smaller scale complex actions tackling<br />

multiple interlinked problems. Those are factors that allow cities to successfully compete<br />

with each other.<br />

14


Different factors influence the city competitiveness. The most important ones are listed<br />

below:<br />

• Demographic structure.<br />

• Skilled workforce.<br />

• Quality of life.<br />

• Social diversity.<br />

• City recognition.<br />

• City recognition and reputation.<br />

• Costs of doing business.<br />

• Economic structure.<br />

• Financing.<br />

• Networking.<br />

• Research and development.<br />

• Institutional infrastructure.<br />

• Legal regulations and policies.<br />

• Transport and telecommunication accessibility.<br />

• Technical infrastructure.<br />

Demographic structure - when planning long-term involvement in economic<br />

development the demographic trends such as migration rate, income distribution or age<br />

structure cannot be omitted since they influence the availability of workforce, the<br />

consumers’ buying potential and local business environment.<br />

Skilled workforce -intellectual capital, ingenuity, creativity and technical capabilities of<br />

the labor force are key drivers of economic growth nowadays. This is why the availability<br />

of qualified workforce is a crucial factor when analyzing city competitiveness.<br />

Quality of life - to attract and retain top specialists needed for the city’s economy to<br />

develop, a region needs to provide them with satisfying conditions of living. Safe and<br />

healthy physical environment, diversified opportunities for leisure, rich urban culture,<br />

chances of professional and personal growth are among the main factors influencing<br />

individuals’ decisions regarding their choice of a place of stay.<br />

Social diversity - wealth and poverty distribution, social exclusion phenomena,<br />

community’s social capital are important factors to be taken into consideration when<br />

choosing industries to focus on.<br />

City recognition - being easily recognized in a region and worldwide as a city with<br />

certain industries developed can facilitate the process of attracting international<br />

investments, gaining business partners and entering new markets.<br />

Economic structure - among the key factors influencing the likeliness of business to<br />

succeed are its economic surroundings. This factor includes industrial profile of the region,<br />

developed economy sectors, the quality and extent of supply chains, the competitiveness<br />

of local companies, etc.<br />

Costs of doing business - costs related to companies’ activities are often decisive<br />

when choosing a region for opening a new branch or founding a new company. These<br />

include state and municipal tax levels, land and resources prices, office rents, wages and<br />

so on.<br />

15


Financing business – such initiatives as expansion to new markets or founding new<br />

companies very often involve finding external financial support. The availability of various<br />

institutions providing local firms with support on different levels, from small credits to joint<br />

venture capitals, influences the chances of product development.<br />

Networking - the strength of inter-firm and public-private relationships between<br />

companies, institutions and a government within the region and beyond. High networking<br />

level can seriously boost economic activity within the region, fostering innovation and<br />

enabling the establishment of strategic alliances. Networking can take place both on<br />

informal (random encounters) and formal (conferences, industry associations meetings)<br />

basis.<br />

Institutional infrastructure - the existence and quality of services of various<br />

institutions supporting business, such as research centers, health, education and<br />

community services, companies dealing with finance, legal issues, marketing or<br />

transportation are crucial for business climate in the region.<br />

Legal regulations and policies - policies and programs supporting this kind of<br />

activity and quality of services that public administration provides to the market. These<br />

may include anti-trust law, regulations regarding conditions of entering the market, local<br />

officials willingness to support the branch and such.<br />

Transport and telecommunication accessibility - collecting information and being<br />

able to act fast are becoming increasingly important elements in gaining competitive<br />

advantage. That is why companies are interested in the availability of transportation<br />

channels such as roads, airports, railways, along with telecommunication services –<br />

internet, mobile telephony and such.<br />

Technical infrastructure - the availability of space for doing business (from small<br />

offices for the start-ups and SMEs to Greenfield investment land for multinationals),<br />

electricity supply and the presence of basic urban infrastructure such as piped services<br />

(water, sewers) are among the basic elements necessary for businesses to develop.<br />

2.3. Assessment of Tbilisi competitiveness<br />

The competitiveness of Tbilisi was assessed in two aspects:<br />

• its competitiveness in relation to other Georgian cities,<br />

• its competitiveness in relation to other cities in the region of Caucasus and central<br />

Asia.<br />

The assessments were carried out by means of the SWOT method, which is usually<br />

applied by the SRGG when evaluating the competitiveness of cities.<br />

Tbilisi in the country<br />

In order to assess the economic situation of Georgian cities during the workshop session<br />

of the City Team the guests from other Georgian cities evaluated current economic<br />

changes in their environment. They took into consideration the condition of both traditional<br />

and emerging economic sectors, demographic changes and the workforce educational<br />

improvement, the level of technical and urban infrastructure.<br />

The assessments were performed with Tbilisi city team and the guests from Rustavi,<br />

Batumi and Kutaisi<br />

16


The assessment results are presented in the table below.<br />

Table 2-1 City of Tbilisi in the country, assessment results<br />

Demography<br />

Kutaisi Tbilisi. Rustawi Batumi Gori<br />

• population 0 + 0 + -<br />

• natural birth rate + + + + - -<br />

• age structure - - - - - - -<br />

• migrations - - + - 0 -<br />

• suburbanisation 0 +- - - 0<br />

Economy<br />

• traditional economy - - - - + +<br />

• new sectors + ++ + + 0<br />

• institutional infrastructure + ++ + ++ ++<br />

• new city products + ++ + + +<br />

Education<br />

• school education + +++ + ++ ++<br />

• business supply + +++ 0 + +<br />

• vocational trainings 0 +++ 0 + +<br />

Financing resources<br />

• local government ++ +++ ++ ++ ++<br />

• business + + + ++ ++<br />

• citizens + + + + +<br />

Local government<br />

• cooperation with Central ++ +++ + ++ ++<br />

Government<br />

• cooperation with<br />

0 ++ + + 0<br />

neighbor municipalities<br />

• cooperation with citizens ++ ++ + + +<br />

• cooperation with<br />

+ +++ + ++ ++<br />

business<br />

Explanation:<br />

+++ increase more than 75%<br />

++ increase more than 25% less 75%<br />

+ increase more than 25% less 1%<br />

--- decrease more than 1% less 25%<br />

-- decrease more than 25% less 75%<br />

- decrease more than 75%<br />

The results show that all the cities are changing dynamically and their situation is<br />

improving.<br />

In the second phase the city teams carried out the SWOT competitive assessment of their<br />

cities in relation to other Georgian cities.<br />

17


City of Kutaisi<br />

Chart 2-1 City of Kutaisi SWOT analysis<br />

OPPORTUNITIES<br />

2 Business<br />

organizations<br />

6 Reputation<br />

of the City<br />

3 Education system<br />

4 Infrastructure<br />

Weaknesses<br />

1 Workforce<br />

Strengths<br />

5 Quality of life<br />

THREATS<br />

City of Rustavi<br />

Chart 2-2 City of Rustavi SWOT analysis<br />

OPPORTUNITIES<br />

4 Infrastructure<br />

5 Quality of life<br />

1 Workforce<br />

6 Reputation<br />

of the City<br />

Weaknesses<br />

2 Business<br />

organizations<br />

Strengths<br />

3 Education system<br />

THREATS<br />

18


City of Batumi<br />

Chart 2-3 City of Batumi SWOT analysis<br />

OPPORTUNITIES<br />

2 Business<br />

organization<br />

s<br />

1 Workforce<br />

4 Infrastructure<br />

6 Reputation<br />

of the City<br />

Weaknesses<br />

3 Education system<br />

Strengths<br />

5 Quality of life<br />

THREATS<br />

The SWOT competitive assessment is based on positioning the key factors of city<br />

competitiveness in a coordinate system. The X axis allows to evaluate factors such as<br />

strong and weak points of the city. The Y axis positions the same factor vertically and<br />

demonstrates the opportunities and threats it will bring in the future. The results of the<br />

SWOT competitive assessment for Batumi, Rustavi, Kutaisi and Tbilisi are presented<br />

below. Finally, Tbilisi team evaluated a complete list of competitiveness factors in their city<br />

in comparison to other cities.<br />

19


3. New dimension of city policies ( on the way to knowledge base economy)<br />

3.1. Skilled workforce<br />

This indicator measures the total number of employed citizens in Tbilisi in the last four<br />

years. It breaks down data by type of activity in order to describe the active labor market.<br />

This data present key employment sectors in the past and show where the new jobs<br />

emerged during four years as well as those sectors which are in urgent need of<br />

improvement.<br />

Table 3-1 The employed by type of activity.<br />

(thsds. of persons) 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Agriculture hunting & forestry 0.7 3.0 2.6 6.8 3.1<br />

Mining 1.4 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.5<br />

Manufacturing 24.9 28.4 29.8 33.9 39.0<br />

Electricity, gas & water supply 7.6 7.9 5.9 7.6 7.9<br />

Construction 10.4 12.8 17.0 15.4 11.6<br />

Wholesale & retail trade, repair of motor<br />

vehicles & personal & household goods 44.5 78.2 73.3 71.1 64.4<br />

Hotels and restaurants 5.8 5.7 6.4 7.7 6.6<br />

Transport, storage & communication 19.5 24.6 25.8 21.2 21.9<br />

Financial intermediation 0.2 3.4 4.1 5.2 6.1<br />

Real estate renting & business activities 11.2 10.7 19.9 16.7 15.2<br />

Public administration & defense, social<br />

security 43.2 37.9 32.5 29.1<br />

Education, healthcare & social work 37.3 64.3 63.7 67.6 69.1<br />

Other community, social and personal<br />

services activities 6.7 31.3 23.3 19.9 19.7<br />

Household economy with hired<br />

employment 5.1 5.3 6.5 8.4<br />

Exterritorial organizations & bodies 0.3 1.9 2.9 2.5<br />

Non identified<br />

Total 170.2 319.5 317.0 315.6 305.1<br />

More careful observation of the trends on the local labor market is also carried out in the<br />

districts of Tbilisi. Its results show that every year there are less registered vacancies and,<br />

at the same time, there are fewer job seekers. It results from the fact that people find jobs<br />

outside the labor market institutions operating in Tbilisi. The districts where workers are<br />

most looked for are Saburtalo-Vake oraz Didube-Chuhureti, while the district where the<br />

number of job seekers is the highest (several times more than in other parts of the city) is<br />

Isani-Samgori. It is worth mentioning that it is the district with the largest share of people in<br />

productive age.<br />

20


3.2. Clusters<br />

Clusters has become a new tool for developing local and regional economic development<br />

strategies. City economies can grow around dynamic clusters which offer firms the best<br />

external spillovers and synergies. City representatives need a tool that would allow them<br />

to identify local promising clusters, that have growth potential, can generate new work<br />

places and can be competitive at international markets. Analysis is intended to help the<br />

city leaders to better allocate resources intended for city economic development by<br />

focusing investment in local business activity toward growing clusters and by convincing<br />

firms to locate in these clusters.<br />

The methodology that was utilized for the identification of promising industrial clusters in<br />

Tbilisi is based on the analysis of market attractiveness developed by McKinsey &<br />

Company to improve the allocation of corporate funds toward investments in new<br />

markets.<br />

An aim of McKinsey & Co’s analysis is to assess the attractiveness of a market using a<br />

multitude of indicators. In their opinion it better reflects the complexities of a sector and<br />

allow to understand that market attractiveness is a function of several various<br />

components. Indicators correspond to three major -categories that are descriptive of the<br />

market:<br />

• market potential;<br />

• market structure;<br />

• external environment.<br />

Several sub-categories fall under each of these three. The market potential is assessed<br />

by estimating the market size, market saturation, and the market growth rate. Market<br />

structure is composed of suppliers, buyers, substitute products, and intensity of rivalry.<br />

The external environment comprises of the general economic conditions, political<br />

situation, technology, and societal factors.<br />

Each sub-category is assessed using a set of quantitative or qualitative data using<br />

attractiveness ranges. To final evaluation they weigh each sub-category score by its<br />

relative percentage importance to market attractiveness. The weights to each subcategory<br />

score are subjective, depending on their relative importance, but when summed<br />

they must add to 100 percent. The weighted scores are then summed to give a final score<br />

of market attractiveness that ranges from a least attractive score to most attractive score.<br />

21


The clusters have been assessed in three categories: of their market potential, market<br />

structure and environment.<br />

Financial cluster<br />

The financial cluster has a high market potential and a medium potential of products<br />

currently offered in Tbilisi. It also demonstrates a medium rate of the job market increase<br />

as well as a medium salary level. As for the market structure the financial cluster has an<br />

advantage of the lack of substitutes and of an easy access to new technological and<br />

organisational solutions. The environment means mainly the application of new<br />

technologies. The political situation in the country as well as its economic situation are<br />

moderately attractive. Social indices indicate low attractiveness for the cluster’s services,<br />

which probably results from the general economic situation of both local residents and<br />

businesses. The financial cluster has received a general mark of 1.1 (the maximum mark<br />

is 2.0), which means that the cluster’s attractiveness and its growth perspectives slightly<br />

exceed the medium level. It should be noted, however, that the cluster is going to develop<br />

more dynamically when the local economy and the local residents’ economic situation<br />

grow.<br />

Education cluster<br />

The education cluster demonstrates high growth potential due to the increased demand<br />

for re-training services for adults and young people’s educational needs. Because of the<br />

economic conditions in which local educational organisations operate the existing<br />

education product has a medium growth potential. Over-supply of teachers as well as low<br />

salaries do not provide favourable conditions for higher benefits and more employment in<br />

the sector. The sector market structure and its environment are highly attractive due to<br />

many customers, the shortage of alternatives, the political situation and social<br />

expectations. Low marks concerning the cluster’s attractiveness result from the<br />

employment and salary growth parameters, insufficient use of new technologies as well<br />

as from low productivity. The constructed corporate city development plans should<br />

particularly focus on the education cluster. With its good didactic and training facilities, a<br />

market oriented offer and highly qualified stuff the cluster will obviously become one of the<br />

fastest growing segments of local market. Its potential will be even more important as a<br />

support to one of the main factors of the city competitiveness, i.e. the skilled workforce<br />

22


Real estate cluster.<br />

The analysis of processes occurring on the real estate market requires long time series,<br />

because their nature is related to long-term trade cycles. In case of Tbilisi is a difficult task<br />

due to the economic transformation and political changes. Moreover, the reliability of data<br />

collected in previous years is undermined by the discrepancies between the official and<br />

market prices. The real estate and construction cluster in Tbilisi is characterized by high<br />

dynamics of the market potential and high potential of product growth. The parameters<br />

that apparently diminish its attractiveness include strong competition and people’s low<br />

economic potential. It is obvious that an important element of the cluster growth is the<br />

programmed aiming at keeping systematic record of available land, which will allow the<br />

city to build a land market. The economic development is going to stimulate the real<br />

estate market both in the housing construction sector and in office, storage and industrial<br />

construction sector. Also the demand for new operating areas for trade companies is<br />

going to grow.<br />

Transportation cluster.<br />

The attractiveness of the cluster related to transport and logistics companies results<br />

mainly from the geographical location of Tbilisi where main Georgian and international<br />

transport routes meet.<br />

The globalization of manufacturing and the related supply chains increase the demand for<br />

transport services. Logistics is getting increasingly important not only in Georgia itself, but<br />

also as a part of international economic relations. When assessing the attractiveness of<br />

the cluster the high marks have been given to the development potential and the products<br />

(services) growth potential. The general mark of 1.2 places the cluster slightly below the<br />

average, but the worldwide trends indicate that this cluster will develop dynamically in the<br />

future.<br />

The growth of commodity transportation logistics is first of all related to the economic<br />

activity and is defined as the industry task. Main areas of the city intervention include<br />

mainly giving access to developed land, promoting innovation and workforce training<br />

Industry cluster.<br />

The industry cluster has been marked as the least attractive. The old system left<br />

businesses closely dependent on the Russian markets and carrying the burden of high<br />

fixed costs. Consequently most of traditional industry companies closed down. Because<br />

of growing productivity, that has resulted from the use of new technologies, and stronger<br />

competition mainly of Asiatic countries the industrial sector is not very attractive. Apart<br />

form highly rated political situation and social indices the other attractiveness parameters<br />

of the cluster demonstrate low values. Therefore, it has been assessed well below the<br />

average. The revitalization of buildings and warehouses that used to belong to closeddown<br />

production plants should become one of the priorities while creating the economic<br />

development plan for Tbilisi. Also the workers who have been made redundant should be<br />

re-trained and instructed how to find new jobs.<br />

23


Creative cluster<br />

The support for the development of small and medium businesses entering new sectors<br />

of new economy and using latest organizational and technological solutions should be a<br />

key element of Tbilisi economic development strategy. The cluster has been marked 1.2,<br />

which means that its attractiveness is above the average. It is its market growth potential<br />

and the potential of created products that should be assessed particularly high. In the<br />

situation when the traditional sectors of economy have collapsed as a result of economic<br />

and political transformation, small and medium enterprises generate the largest number of<br />

jobs. It is SMEs that fuel local economy and implement innovative solutions. Thanks to the<br />

city’s support for projects dealing with micro credits, credit security funds,<br />

entrepreneurship incubators, technology parks, promotion of local business, etc. the<br />

cluster is likely to grow the fastest and, consequently, to create new jobs. The cooperation<br />

of local authorities and the local business can contribute to improving not only the city<br />

economic parameters but also the local quality of life and the standards of offered<br />

services. In the longer perspective the companies in this sector are going to generate<br />

larger and larger share of the added value and attract more and more external capital that<br />

will finance new investments.<br />

Tourist cluster<br />

The tourist cluster has received the highest mark of all the identified potential clusters. Its<br />

attractiveness results from the high market potential, the high potential of products<br />

(services) growth as well as of the high quality of its environment. Thanks to its cultural,<br />

architectural, social and historical values the tourist cluster is likely to make the city<br />

attractive to both occasional visitors and organized groups. The large number of financial<br />

institutions, international business corporations and support organizations operating in<br />

Tbilisi is a good basis for creating a wide range of offers for business tourism. Thanks to<br />

the stable political and economic situation a growing number of visitors are interested in<br />

Tbilisi, as well as in Georgia. Tourist potential includes the historic buildings, local culture<br />

and cuisine as well as local landscapes and nature. Also in this case the city should<br />

initiate and support projects helping local tourist industry who are aiming at building an<br />

integrated system of tourist information and a complex offer addressed to various types of<br />

tourism. The integration of the environment institutions can have a positive effect on the<br />

quality of the tourist offer<br />

24


3.3. Start ups<br />

Table 3-2 Number of new registered entities by regions<br />

Number of new registered entities by regions<br />

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

GEORGIA- TOTAL 14585 12402 14841 25324 29978<br />

of which<br />

City of Tbilisi 5989 6316 8939 15534 19220<br />

Apkhazeti A.R. 301 163 91 19 19<br />

Ajara A.R. 1213 320 512 734 1039<br />

Guria 386 106 126 752 549<br />

Imereti 1686 824 781 636 1787<br />

Kakheti 960 1866 226 306 613<br />

Mtskheta- Mtianeti 622 386 430 444 407<br />

Racha- Lechkhumi&Kvemo<br />

Svaneti 206 133 75 46 80<br />

Samegrelo- Zemo Svaneti 1280 807 955 2564 2480<br />

Samtskhe- Javakheti 153 302 175 192 388<br />

Kvemo Kartli 910 850 1343 3032 2417<br />

Shida Kartli 1253 662 1533 1061 882<br />

Table 3-3 Number of new businesses by sector in Tbilisi.<br />

Units 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Entities – total 4626 5989 6316 8939<br />

Of which: 0 0 0 0<br />

Agriculture, hunting and forestry 14 3 10 10<br />

Fishing 0 2 0 1<br />

Mining and quarrying 6 1 2 5<br />

Manufacturing 159 185 296 348<br />

Electricity, gas and water supply 12 1 4 3<br />

Constructions 84 52 82 122<br />

Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor<br />

vehicles, motorcycles and personal and<br />

household goods 3361 4830 4649 7009<br />

Hotels and restaurants 42 62 82 115<br />

Transport, storage and communication 111 64 76 151<br />

Financial intermediation 25 10 40 30<br />

Real estate, renting and business activities 195 139 186 270<br />

Public administration and defense; compulsory<br />

social security 25 12 14 31<br />

Education 52 30 40 26<br />

Health and social work 40 41 34 49<br />

Other community, social and personal service<br />

activities 499 557 801 768<br />

Private households with employed persons 0 0 0 0<br />

Extra-territorial organizations and bodies 1 0 0 1<br />

25


From the city’s economic policy point of view the dynamics and industrial structure of new<br />

businesses are extremely important.<br />

In each of the analyzed years the number of businesses set up in Tbilisi grew. The only<br />

industry where this dynamics has been slowing down is electricity, gas and water supply,<br />

but this area is strongly controlled by the state and free market principles are non-existent<br />

there. Another such area includes agriculture, hunting and forestry, i.e. industries that are<br />

not technologically advanced and therefore not attractive. The third sector of poor<br />

dynamics is education. In this case the reason for slower growth of businesses is heavy<br />

saturation of the market with traditional educational services (schools, universities). The<br />

number of businesses in other areas is increasing. Thus it seems necessary to carry out<br />

further research in order to answer the question how long newly established companies<br />

can survive and how they will develop in the future.<br />

3.4. Quality of place<br />

The Government of Georgia established the amounts of social assistance for the families<br />

below the poverty margin which depend on the number of members of registered socially<br />

vulnerable families at the moment of allocation of the welfare benefit.<br />

The amounts are as follows: for single-member families – 38 GEL; for two-member<br />

families – 55 GEL; for three-member families – 70 GEL; for four-member families – 85<br />

GEL; for five-member families – 100 GEL; for six-member families – 115 GEL; for sevenmember<br />

families – 125 GEL. For the families with eight and more members 10 GEL<br />

assistance is added for the eighth and each additional member.<br />

On 30 May 2006 in Tbilisi there were 95 749 people living in 33 349 families who<br />

considered themselves being in extreme poverty according to their socio-economic status<br />

and who expressed the wish to receive social assistance. Both by number of families and<br />

number of population, the majority of the registered families live in Gldani-Nadzaladevi<br />

(32.0%) and Isani-Samgori districts (23.0%), while the minority of registered families<br />

inhabit Vake-Saburtalo district (12.4%). The statistics indicate that the living conditions of<br />

the registered population are extremely hard. Considering the cash-based add-ins of all<br />

types, 37.2% of total financial income of registered population are old age pensions,<br />

27.1% - salaries and 20.1% - income from individual business activity.<br />

According to the declared data, total income of the last one month of the registered<br />

socially vulnerable population amounted to 3,082,604 GEL that is 32.1 GEL per person<br />

for the registered category of population, and this indicator represents only 32.5% of<br />

minimum living costs according to the Department of Statistics as of January 1, 2006<br />

(19.6% under old indicators).<br />

26


3.5. Tbilisi territorial structure<br />

3.5.1. Basic historical stages<br />

Contemporary territorial structure of Tbilisi was formed in the process of city historical<br />

development as a result of internal and external factors impact. This process consists of<br />

several emphatic chronological stages.<br />

Feudal age (from recognition of Tbilisi as a capital city to the end of the XVIII century). The<br />

city is developed on both embankments of the river Mtkvari, in the limited territorial<br />

conditions – basically, within the city fence. In the end of this period can be observed the<br />

trend of moving out of the fence in the mode of external district.<br />

Period of Russian empire (1801-1917) - The city self-defensive surrounding is losing<br />

significance, Tbilisi first invades in higher Plato of the right embankment of the river<br />

Mtkvari; on the left embankment German colony is established; later occurs its and<br />

outskirt countries incorporation into Tbilisi administrative boarders. The city acquires the<br />

trend of linear development, basically in the upper direction of the river Mtkvari.<br />

Coexistence of ancient “Asian” and modern “European” parts is formed like metaphoric<br />

description of “double-face Ianus”.<br />

Short term existence of Georgian democratic republic (1918-1921) added nothing to<br />

Tbilisi in terms of territorial development.<br />

Soviet period (1921-1991) was marked with emphatic increase of capital population and<br />

its territory. All parameters of the city development were regulated by General plans; In<br />

the Soviet period, since 1934, 3 general plans had been adopted; The calculating period<br />

of the last of which was accounted till 2000. According to the general plan, residential<br />

massifs, industrial-storage zones are created in the peripheries, social-cultural and<br />

storage-technical infrastructure are developed; For the first time, attention is paid to the<br />

urban heritage; also considerable attention is paid to the city green plants and suburban<br />

recreational zones.<br />

Period of Independence (1991- till now). In recent years the city has been developing on<br />

behalf of the internal territorial resources, often, contradictional to the emerged building<br />

process and without taking into consideration interests of the residents. Under the<br />

conditions of reducing Tbilisi population number and beginning suburbanization, in the<br />

end of 2006 emphatic expansion of the capital administrative boarders (recently created<br />

Didgori region) and separating of the “Old Tbilisi” administrative region acquires a new<br />

space to the capital urban problem. This challenge should be answered by the<br />

announced contest on composing “general plan of Tbilisi land use”.<br />

27


3.5.2. Spatial structure<br />

Such immanent feature of Tbilisi spatial development as linear was naturally reflected in<br />

the configuration of its centre. Logical Urban researches held yet in the Soviet period,<br />

proved that entire city centre of Tbilisi is developing linear along the river Mtkvari gorge.<br />

Localization of city forming objects and mental maps of Tbilisi residents make this fact<br />

evident.<br />

Central structures expose general trends of development upper of the river Mtkvari;<br />

Although lately, the desire of allocating city forming objects within “Old Tbilisi” and in the<br />

direction of the flow of Mtkvari has been emphasizing. Thus, Tbilisi common city center<br />

territorially expands from the Freedom square in two directions.<br />

First and basic, on the right embankment of the river Mtkvari implies Rustaveli Avenue,<br />

acquires several branches at the Philharmonic buildings in the direction of Merab Kostava<br />

and Melikishvili streets, moving into the Ilia Chavchavadze Avenue, Konstantine<br />

Gamsakhurdia street and Vazha-Phshavela Avenue. Simultaneously center forming<br />

functions of David the builder and Akaki Tsereteli Avenues are being developed.<br />

The second direction of the city develops from the Freedom Square including the old city<br />

and, then in the directions of Avlabari-Isani and Ortachala with linear branches.<br />

Thus, the features of the Tbilisi common city center are:<br />

• Linear and dynamic character;<br />

• Expansion of the linear structures on behalf of the streets;<br />

• Poor withy functional-planning links between the parallel central axises;<br />

• Increasingly emphasized importance of the old city;<br />

• Dispersive development of the city forming objects.<br />

Such features of the Tbilisi centre makes difficult identification of the centre core.<br />

More simple is pointing out the transit and commercial corridors. Tbilisi located in the<br />

TRACECA corridor is forced to let pass international cargo flows via its embankment,<br />

because of the damaged condition of the Tbilisi sea beyond road. These embankments,<br />

essentially, are the only draught highways on the whole territory of Tbilisi. For now the<br />

issue on cutting Kakheti highway till Avchala is being worked out, what will immensely<br />

unload the city centre.<br />

Coming out of the specific location of the Tbilisi relief (differences between the heights of<br />

the river Mtkvari shores) widthy links are more complicated. The railway line within the city<br />

creates the same problem; overcoming of the railway line for the aboveground transport is<br />

possible only in two places, with making distance of 5 kilometres between them.<br />

Implementation of viaduct in the direction of Didube-Nadzaladevi accounted in general<br />

plan is far from realizing.<br />

28


Coming out of the linear configuration of the territorial structure, large residential districts,<br />

basically, were constructed in the North and North-West, also in the South-East parts of<br />

the city. Their construction was performed on the precious agricultural lands, what was<br />

natural in Soviet period in the conditions of extensive assimilating of the city territories.<br />

As a result of expansion of Tbilisi territory in 2006 the capital city assimilated part of the<br />

Mtskheta and Gardabani districts. Consequently, the diversified problem of functioning of<br />

the country like residential areas in the joined part has become very actual. Social-cultural<br />

and engineering-technical rehabilitation or amenities will significantly increase the volume<br />

of Tbilisi housing fund, will improve its quality and become the fundament of broadening<br />

the base of city revenues.<br />

3.5.3. New trends of Tbilisi city functional-spatial development under new socialeconomic<br />

conditions<br />

New stage of Tbilisi functional-spatial development begins with re-establishment of<br />

Georgia independence (1991). But, the face of contemporary capital was essentially<br />

affected by the last period of communistic regime.<br />

At that time, in order to facilitate the political tension in September of 1987 by the directive<br />

bodies of Soviet Georgia was adopted document, which practically was the first one, that<br />

admitted some construction initiative from the side of population. The enforcement of the<br />

document was stimulated by the tragic events of 9 April of 1989; In several weeks was<br />

issued decree by Tbilisi city council executive committee, which gave permissions to the<br />

residents of the state housing fund to lead the additional building of balconies, verandas<br />

and other supporting receptacles by their financial means, following particular technical<br />

conditions. Tbilisi was covered by ugly, often unsecured additional buildings, which<br />

acquired more and more ugly look to the unsuccessful without it blocks of mass building.<br />

Little early, were taken first steps in the direction of making land accessible for the city<br />

residents, outside the city giving kitchen gardens and country houses in the form of<br />

cooperatives. In this new emerged areas land and house volumes were severely defined<br />

by norms. City residents who desired to have own land and individual houses immediately<br />

started construction; Tbilisi outskirt territory in the radius of 30-40 km immediately was<br />

covered by country like residential areas, that are now in the various stages of finish.<br />

Law project on “privatization of housing” published in September of the same year,<br />

basically was responding to the international practice, mainly, because of working out of<br />

the housing reform economic aspects and was giving hope for successful urban<br />

management under the modern social-economic conditions.<br />

29


The results of the 25 April earthquake in 2002 emphasized the complaints of the poor<br />

proprietors of the damages houses in the direction of government. Simultaneously with<br />

the lack of care rapid degradation of housing fund, in one trace with political and economic<br />

stabilization, commercial housing construction began development; social (municipal,<br />

public) housing fund was not being built in Tbilisi even till nowadays – despite the<br />

necessity, societal requirements and international recommendations.<br />

Commercial housing construction mainly was intending to concentrate on historically<br />

formed, most prestigious districts such as Vake, Vera, Mtatsminda. Prestige category,<br />

characteristic for Georgian culture, and which finally, is reflected in the prices of real<br />

estate, acquired commercial meaning and was also reflected in some normative acts.<br />

New multi-storied houses were often built without accounting accurate city constructive<br />

situation, sanitary-hygienic or housing norms, despite the protests of residents. Today its<br />

already evident, that such tightening of building in prestigious districts caused ecological<br />

problems, surplus of individual transport, overloading of social-cultural and engineeringtechnical<br />

infrastructure, and finally, decline of urban environment quality.<br />

In recent years in the sector of housing construction developer activities acquired more<br />

civilized look. It is worth to mention, that developer activities is expanding in terms of<br />

territory and it is moving to the regions near to the centre (Saburtalo); and recently to the<br />

regions, early considered not to be prestigious.<br />

In the terms of above, best example is Avlabari district, which despite its features (central<br />

position, good micro-climate, transport infrastructure, best view and exposition to the<br />

various parts of the country), was unevenly positioned on the lower place in the<br />

classification of prestige districts. Avlabari was being implemented such city forming<br />

activities, as construction of the Saint Trinity Cathedral and office of the President of<br />

Georgia. All above mentioned increased the district prestige and relatively price on the<br />

land.<br />

Some developers take even more accurate steps and directs its interests to yet nonprestigious<br />

territories. As an instance of this must serve start-up project called “Ortachalis<br />

Turfa” implemented by the “Arci” company in the south-East part of the city, and which<br />

attracts buyers with relatively low prices and complexity of building (with the components<br />

of social infrastructure).<br />

But, in terms of territorial attractiveness, traditional priority is on the side of housing<br />

construction at the edge of Tbilisi North and North-West (Bagebi, Didi Digomi), where<br />

important territorial resources and using of former agricultural lands made possible to<br />

create homestead building. Besides the best micro-climate conditions, prestige of this<br />

zone was also encouraged by the construction of the new Embassy of the USA.<br />

30


The latest situation, together with general trend, states on a new position destiny of<br />

country like residential areas in the Tbilisi surroundings existed yet in the end of Soviet<br />

Period. Their engineering technical and social rehabilitation will positively influence<br />

general structure of Tbilisi housing fund and will be economically useful for the city. This<br />

topic deserves deeper attention and more than that implementation of political projects.<br />

In this direction really supporting factor is expansion of Tbilisi administrative boarders in<br />

the end of 2006 on behalf of the hinterland and summer-cottage zone. on the meeting of<br />

the 30th march of 2007 Tbilisi city council (Sakrebulo) approved enhanced new fiscal<br />

zoning of Tbilisi, which will support developer activities in the newly joined territories and<br />

thus, expansion of the suburbanization process. It is important, that some companies<br />

have already taken advanced steps for construction of the residential community.<br />

3.6. Allocation of new development projects<br />

Moving into the new social-economic conditions caused dramatic changes of office and<br />

commercial objects allocation terms in the city planning structure.<br />

Market relations, mainly, were reflected in dislocation of small trading objects. In 1993 was<br />

allowed street trade practically everywhere and in every form.. It’s important to mention,<br />

that in the process of seeking own space on the market the profile and class of these<br />

small objects was somehow changed. Houses ground floors which made shelters for<br />

trading and service objects, weren’t satisfying new purpose with their first planning<br />

structure (problem of entrance from the street; engineering equipment, sanitarian<br />

conditions, non-existence of stores and secondary closets, etc.). many problems are<br />

generated from arranging downstairs in the cellars, what often was managed to<br />

accomplish using the street sidewalks. Today in the central part of the city can be noticed<br />

internal development of the offices already allocated on the ground floor, on behalf of the<br />

second, seldom the third floors. In terms of real estate must be underlined the fact, that<br />

such legal persons, as a rule, don’t participate in the management of the whole house<br />

(condominium), despite the requirements of the civic code.<br />

Early simultaneously only with the diversification of the residential house functions, was<br />

implemented departing, reducing of the structures of above mentioned large<br />

organization-establishments and degovernmentation of most of their owned buildings.<br />

Most important is the fact, that this process was being implemented omitting<br />

municipalisation stage of the real estate, with fading the urban land problem.<br />

Following stage of development is presented by promotion and construction of originally<br />

mixed function buildings, when 1-2 floors were accounted on office or trade and service<br />

objects, above which were located flats. Simultaneously some large companies were<br />

constructing separately located headquarters.<br />

New stage of creating and exploiting office spaces is construction of the special buildings,<br />

what is recently observed in Tbilisi. In this direction, it’s worth to notice basically office and<br />

trade building, which is being constructed on Ilia Chavchavadze Avenue #34, and “Axis<br />

towers” also on I. Chavchavadze Avenue. The latest is the mode of “second hand”<br />

architecture (such objects of curved prisms (forms) are planned in Istanbul and Astana),<br />

but today already announced prices dictate that These office spaces will respond to the<br />

high rate of the international classification.<br />

31


As for the mass and wholesale large trade objects (so-called “’bazrobebi”), Two of them<br />

Lilo and Navtlughi fairs are located in the South-East periphery of the city, and the<br />

attempts to move other two (to Dezertirebi market and Eliava street) to the North-West<br />

periphery had no results and the government was forced to be contended with making<br />

them “noble” at the same places.<br />

Although, in terms of city planning, their location will dramatically damage the city<br />

environment. The casinos are concentrated in the central part of the city (today, as a<br />

result of particular legislative steps only several casinos are operating in Tbilisi and there’s<br />

an idea of moving all of them to Tskhaltubo resort – like the planned measurements in<br />

Russia), newly opened restaurants are moving in the direction of Old Tbilisi or Automobile<br />

highways, basically on the Mtkvari embankment and in the North-West exit of the city.<br />

Construction of the sport-recreational objects are not following the requirements - there<br />

are only 2 modern swimming pools in Tbilisi. It’s being implemented assimilating of the<br />

water reservoirs in terms of amenities – here on the first place is “kus Tba” lake; It is<br />

followed by Lisi lake and Tbilsi sea. Internal quarter mini-field (ground) network is being<br />

expanded (basically, with artificial cover). By means of private capital new tennis ground<br />

was built in Dighomi.<br />

Energetically is being constructed Orthodox churches, besides the Saint Trinity grand<br />

Cathedral, small parochial churches network will include every residential district – as<br />

central, so peripheral. It must be separated issue of developing hotels network. World<br />

brands of hotel economy have been wildly interested in Tbilisi. They operate in several<br />

directions – reconstruction of already existed hotels, demolition of already existed building<br />

and construction of the new hotels, acquiring of city forming objects and their adaptation.<br />

At the current stage such interest from the world brands isn’t defined only by new<br />

economic interests (operating hotels completing with guests is far from normative); It must<br />

be defined as by future expectations, so by the presence factor of assimilating world<br />

geography. Besides the entrance of the hotel-business grants on Tbilisi market, network<br />

of the small hotels are being developed – due to their low prices and familiar atmosphere.<br />

But, the main problem for the city ambitions to become tourist centre still remains nonexistence<br />

of large, cheap hotels and hostels for mass tourism. We’ll also name<br />

discrepancies of the city information system (including language) and catastrophic<br />

conditions of the public toilets – as in quantity terms, so in terms of quality among the<br />

factors biasing tourism in Tbilisi.<br />

Under the conditions of distributing real estate, most attractive advantage of the industrial<br />

objects was considered to be territories occupied by the latest. It was particularly essential<br />

in the central zones and the ones near it. In the years of Independence most part of the<br />

Tbilisi industrial objects stopped functioning; Engines and equipments were sold as black<br />

scrap metals; And the buildings itself in terms of modern technologies, didn’t make any<br />

sense anymore. Instead of it, increased the interests of the builders to the territories<br />

occupied by the above mentioned objects. On some of this territory already is<br />

implementing construction of commercial housing (for example, silk weaving plant territory<br />

in Vera district). Together with this, still exist such large industrial zones, which don’t yet<br />

rise interest among developers (for instance, industrial zone of Ulianovka); Converse of<br />

such zones would be facilitated in the case of supporting steps taken by state/city.<br />

32


Tbilisi, as a capital of the country takes functions of the central and city government, which<br />

is reflected in the location of administrative institutional structures and relevant objects.<br />

Central functions are mainly gathered in the centre of Tbilisi, but also there are some<br />

exceptions. The example of territorial decentralization effort is the Constitutional Court,<br />

moving of which was planned at first in the direction to the city of Mtskheta and now to the<br />

city of Kutaisi. New residence of the President of Georgia is being built in the district of<br />

Avlabari, which has a prospect for urban renewal.<br />

As for the city administration, as a result of new reform “Greater Tbilisi” consists of 7<br />

administrational districts. Their overwhelming sizes and the difficulties with access to the<br />

district administrations (so-called “gamgeoba”) doesn’t respond to such fundamental<br />

principles of the local self-government as subsidiary and, also the historically formed<br />

tradition of structuring Tbilisi territory as natural community.<br />

Under Tbilisi conditions it’s very important to keep public spaces. As a result of<br />

unanalyzed and often crime like privatization, the part of such important elements of the<br />

city space as embankments, river channel and city square moved into the hands of the<br />

private capital. Most harmful was the privatization of such important for the city objects<br />

against the societal opinion, as Rikhis Ubani on the left embankment of the river Mtkvari,<br />

within the historical core of the city.<br />

Sport-recreational objects are suffering from the attacks of the builders. It’s already<br />

implementing or is starting building of such objects as the river Vere gorge, which was<br />

forming as the children city “Mziuri” in the Soviet period; Hippodrome of Tbilisi, stadium<br />

territory in Avlabari, etc. Tbilisi greenery is also under the pressure (residential house in<br />

Alexander garden, separating territories in the park of Vake and near wood-parks for the<br />

Embassies and Football Federation, construction of elite residential houses in Bagebi,<br />

etc.).<br />

Generally, may be said that Tbilisi now is in the transitional stage of getting familiar with<br />

modern social-economic conditions and relations of its functional-spatial organization and<br />

planning structure. Action in every particular case of urban development is an unique<br />

combination of multi and often subjective or contradictional factors. Following the maturing<br />

of the real estate market and generally market relations, Tbilisi spatial-territorial<br />

development, distribution of various functions, their restructuring and formation of modern<br />

body of the city will become more comprehensive, adequate and forecasting, what will<br />

finally maintain economic development of Tbilisi, as a large urban centre.<br />

33


4. Tbilisi economy<br />

Tbilisi is on the way to becoming a regional center, Tbilisi’s relationships with the rest of<br />

the country should naturally be transformed. The role of cities as major actors on the<br />

world economy stage demands rethinking the whole approach to urban areas and their<br />

role in economic growth and improving quality of life. This rethinking is required not only<br />

within cities, but at the national level. City has not only the value of itself, but can mean<br />

even more in context of the whole region. The realities of a global economy dictate that all<br />

levels of government reevaluate their understanding of the role of cities, and their policies<br />

and approaches towards cities and towns. While each city is developing its own solutions,<br />

particular group of them should benefit from working together to develop and implement<br />

an integrated national, approach to advancing the economies of major urban centers.<br />

Funding and resources must now be directed toward supporting the transition to a<br />

knowledge economy, in the same way that the government supported the resource<br />

sector, and traditional manufacturing industries in the past. Central government<br />

representatives need to take into account the likely impacts of their policy and program<br />

decisions on urban economies. The emerging role of cities has been recognized round<br />

the world and is being exploited as a engines of national economic growth. A wide range<br />

of innovative initiatives and institutions are being put in place to more effectively respond<br />

to the changing context for cities.<br />

4.1. Economic active population<br />

Economic active population<br />

Table 4-1 Economic active population<br />

Economic active population (thds people)<br />

Georgia- total Tbilisi Tbilisi share %<br />

2001 2113.3 434.5 20.6<br />

2002 2104.2 448.5 21.3<br />

2003 2050.8 429 20.9<br />

2004 2041 426.9 20.9<br />

2005 2023.9 429.8 21.2<br />

34


Table 4-2 Economic active population / total population 2001 - 2005<br />

4.2. Employment<br />

While we can observe the decreasing number of economically active population in<br />

Georgia and Tbilisi during this period, the capital has improved its situation in the last<br />

years and its share in national economically active population has increased. It visible<br />

that the share of economically active population in whole community is still much smaller<br />

in Tbilisi than in the rest of the country.<br />

Employment in business sector by regions<br />

Chart 4-1 Employed in business sector by regions<br />

Economic active population (thds people) / Total population (%)<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2001 48.0 39.9<br />

2002 48.1 41.5<br />

2003 47.2 39.6<br />

2004 47.3 39.3<br />

2005 46.8 39.3<br />

400 000<br />

Employment in business sector in regions in 2006<br />

300 000<br />

100%<br />

3,64% 1,96% 1,88% 1,37% 0,56%<br />

3,82%<br />

5,96%<br />

7,75%<br />

80%<br />

Employment<br />

200 000<br />

53,76%<br />

11,04%<br />

8,25%<br />

60%<br />

Percent<br />

40%<br />

100 000<br />

182 488<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

ShidaKartli<br />

Tbilisi<br />

37 479 28 005 26 294 20 245 12 966 12 347 6 668 6 396 4 667 1 902<br />

Imereti<br />

Adjara<br />

0%<br />

Guria<br />

Kakheti<br />

SamegreloSvaneti<br />

MchetaMtianeti<br />

SamtskheJavaheti<br />

KvemoKartli<br />

RachaLechkhumi<br />

35


Employment in business sector in Tbilisi<br />

Table 4-1 Employment in Tbilisi<br />

Employment ( thds people)<br />

Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />

2001 708.7 323.8 45.7<br />

2002 681.7 319.5 46.9<br />

2003 723.8 317 43.8<br />

2004 722.4 315.8 43.7<br />

Structure of employment<br />

Table 4-2 Structure of employment In Tbilisi<br />

Structure of employment In Tbilisi 2004 2005<br />

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 6.8 3.1<br />

Mining 0.6 0.5<br />

Manufacturing 33.9 39<br />

Electricity, gas, water supply 7.6 7.9<br />

Constructions 15.4 11.6<br />

Trade and Utilities 71.1 64.4<br />

Hotels and Restaurants 7.7 6.6<br />

Transport and storage, communications 21.2 21.9<br />

Financial intermediation 5.2 6.1<br />

Real estate renting, business activities 16.7 15.2<br />

Public administration & defense 32.5 29.1<br />

Education, Health, social services 67.6 69.1<br />

Other community, social and personal services<br />

activities 19.9 19.7<br />

Private house economy with hired employment 6.5 8.4<br />

Exterritorial organizations 2.9 2.5<br />

Total 315.6 305.1<br />

While the trade and utilities employ the most of workforce, their share decries. Industrial<br />

companies after are slowly improving the crisis. The reforms reduced the public<br />

administration share in the job market.<br />

36


4.3. Number of firms by sector<br />

Table 4-3 Number of registered entities by kind of economic activity (by the end of year; unit).<br />

1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Entities – total 8411 30701 35327 41316 47632 56571<br />

of which:<br />

Agriculture, hunting and forestry 202 216 219 229 239<br />

Fishing 9 9 11 11 12<br />

Mining and quarrying 66 72 73 75 80<br />

Manufacturing 1169* 3716 3875 4060 4356 4704<br />

Electricity, gas and water supply 78 90 91 95 98<br />

Constructions 582 1299 1383 1435 1517 1639<br />

Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor<br />

vehicles, motorcycles and personal and<br />

household goods 4788 15193 18554 23384 28033 35042<br />

Hotels and restaurants 938 980 1042 1124 1239<br />

Transport, storage and communication 256 2119 2230 2294 2370 2521<br />

Financial intermediation 440 465 475 515 545<br />

Real estate, renting and business activities 2340 2535 2674 2860 3130<br />

Public administration and defense; compulsory<br />

social security 295 320 332 346 377<br />

Education 477 529 559 599 625<br />

Health and social work 778 818 859 893 942<br />

Other community, social and personal service<br />

activities 1616 2740 3239 3796 4597 5365<br />

Private households with employed persons 6 6 6 6 6<br />

Extra-territorial organizations and bodies 5 6 6 6 7<br />

Table 4-4 Number of registered entities by districts of Tbilisi<br />

(end of year; unit) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Tbilisi - total 30701 35327 41316 47632 56571<br />

of which:<br />

Gldani-Nadzaladevi 5105 5890 6919 7675 8296<br />

Didube-Chugureti 7839 8937 10342 11819 14578<br />

Vake-Saburtalo 8841 10298 12398 14405 16358<br />

Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi 4435 5376 5925 6635 8116<br />

Isani-Samgori 4481 4826 5732 7098 9223<br />

Since the late 1990s the number of companies in Tbilisi, mainly the private ones, has<br />

dynamically grown. As the above tables show the highest dynamics can be observed in<br />

such sectors as industry, manufacturing, commerce and services. This tendency results<br />

from the introduction of market economy and the trend is present in the whole country. In<br />

2000 – 2004 in almost all the city districts the number of companies doubled.<br />

37


4.4. Turnover in business sector<br />

Turnover in business sector by regions<br />

Chart 4-2 Turnover in business sector by regions in 2006<br />

14 000<br />

Turnover in business sector by regions in 2006<br />

Turnover in mln GEL<br />

12 000<br />

10 000<br />

8 000<br />

6 000<br />

4 000<br />

5,8%<br />

8,72%<br />

68,01%<br />

8 529<br />

100%<br />

3,02% 2,12% 1,79% 1,12% 0,53% 0,19%<br />

3,57%<br />

5,11%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

Percent<br />

2 000<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

KvemoKartli<br />

Tbilisi<br />

1 093<br />

727 641 448 379 266 225 141 67 24<br />

Adjara<br />

ShidaKartli<br />

Kakheti<br />

Imereti<br />

Guria<br />

SamegreloSvaneti<br />

MchetaMtianeti<br />

SamtskheJavaheti<br />

0%<br />

RachaLechkhumi<br />

The indicators show how strong economic position of Tbilisi is in the country. Tbilisi<br />

economic share is much higher than its population’s share and the higher economic<br />

growth strengthens Tbilisi’s future position.<br />

Turnover in business sector in Tbilisi<br />

Table 4-5 Turnover in business sector in mln GEL<br />

Turnover in business sector in mln GEL<br />

Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />

2001 3975.2 2133.5 53.7<br />

2002 4595.6 2739.7 59.6<br />

2003 5523 3330 60.3<br />

2004 7248.4 4455.7 61.5<br />

2005 10076.3 6352.8 63.0<br />

38


Turnover and employment<br />

Table 4-6 Turnover in business sector and employment<br />

Turnover in business sector / Employed<br />

Georgia- total<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2001 5.6 6.6<br />

2002 6.7 8.6<br />

2003 7.6 10.5<br />

2004 10.0 14.1<br />

Chart 4-3 Volume of turnover per employee in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

2005<br />

Volume of turnover per employee in business<br />

sector in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

25906,70<br />

33616,30<br />

Georgia<br />

Tbilisi<br />

2004<br />

22456,20<br />

29907,20<br />

YEARS<br />

2003<br />

18546,30<br />

23504,70<br />

2002<br />

15252,10<br />

19084,50<br />

2001<br />

15188,50<br />

12685,30<br />

0 10000 20000 30000 40000<br />

Volume in GEL<br />

Tbilisi economic share is much higher than its population’s share and the higher economic<br />

growth strengthens Tbilisi’s future position. The turnover per employee rate shows how<br />

much more effective Tbilisi companies are. As a result wages are also higher in Tbilisi<br />

than in the whole country.<br />

39


4.5. Earnings<br />

Earnings in business sector by regions<br />

Chart 4-4 Average monthly earnings in business sector by regions in 2006<br />

250<br />

Avarage monthly earnings in business sector by regions in 2006<br />

200<br />

Earnings in GEL<br />

150<br />

100<br />

229<br />

223<br />

202<br />

198<br />

178<br />

162<br />

153<br />

50<br />

124<br />

117<br />

100<br />

91<br />

0<br />

KvemoKartli<br />

SamegreloSvaneti<br />

MchetaMtianeti<br />

SamtskheJavaheti<br />

RachaLechkhumi<br />

Kakheti<br />

ShidaKartli<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Adjara<br />

Imereti<br />

Guria<br />

Earnings in business sector in Tbilisi<br />

Table 4-7 Earnings in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

Earnings in business sector ( in GEL/ month)<br />

Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />

2001 108.4 128.6 118.6<br />

2002 119.9 132.4 110.4<br />

2003 139.4 154.8 111.0<br />

2004 161.6 184.9 114.4<br />

2005 204.5 229.4 112.2<br />

40


Table 4-8 Average monthly wages in sectors<br />

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Average monthly<br />

wages (in GEL):<br />

Total in the country 52,1 67,1 76,8 83,6 90,6 103,6 107,2 118,3<br />

economy<br />

In the state sector 43,9 55,3 62,1 63,9 70,4 75,2 78,8 91,4<br />

In the private<br />

sector<br />

56,6 73,0 83,9 93,5 102,0 120,0 122,0 132,8<br />

Average monthly<br />

wages (in GEL):<br />

In industry 63,8 80,6 86,7 94,0 115,1 138,4 127,3 142,1<br />

In agriculture 36,7 41,5 51,6 89,0 82,7 81,1 82,7 76,4<br />

In service sector 50,4 65,0 75,2 80,8 86,0 96,8 103,9 114,0<br />

In banking financial<br />

sector<br />

87,1 102,2 131,4 100,6 107,6 177,1 158,6 216,7<br />

- Rise in salaries has been observed. The best paid jobs are in the construction cluster.<br />

The average pay in this cluster is 30% higher than in the whole Tbilisi business sector and<br />

its salaries rose the most in the last examined years, i.e. 2005-2006. Another cluster<br />

where the salaries are higher than the business cluster average is the industry cluster<br />

where the significant rise in salaries – by about 50% - took place last year. The lowest<br />

salaries, not exceeding 220 GEL, were earned in the tourist cluster, although they did rise<br />

by 30% in the last examined year. Also, the pay level offered on this market in the three<br />

last examined years (2004-2006) was 30% lower than the salaries in the whole business<br />

cluster. The salaries in the trade, repair of vehicles, personal and household goods cluster<br />

grew considerably in the last examined year (2005-2006) and are comparable with the<br />

mean salary levels in the whole business sector. In the previous years the salaries rose<br />

gradually, but no more than by 10% yearly.<br />

- The comparative analysis of the turnover and employment in 2001-2006 in Tbilisi and<br />

Georgia demonstrates a strong correlation between the processes taking place on the<br />

examined markets in the Georgian national economy and in the economy of Tbilisi. The<br />

tendencies observed in Tbilisi have their reflection in the tendencies happening nationally,<br />

which is due mainly to the fact that Tbilisi economy in the area of the examined clusters<br />

accounts for over 50% of the national turnover and employment.<br />

41


4.6. General data of external trade<br />

Table 4-9 Georgian external trade<br />

General data on Georgian external trade (mln USD)<br />

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Exports 345,9 461,4 646,9 865,5 992,5<br />

Imports 795,5 1141,2 1845,6 2490 3677,8<br />

Balance -449,6 -679,8 -1198,7 -1624,5 -2685,2<br />

Table 4-10 External trade by groups of countries<br />

Georgian external trade by groups of countries<br />

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />

Total Exports 345,9 461,4 646,9 865,5 992,5<br />

Of which:<br />

CIS countries 168,7 224,8 327,6 407,2 394,7<br />

Black Sea Economic Cooperation<br />

Organization countries 180,2 250,3 343,2 498,8 505<br />

GUAM 42,1 46,7 41,1 120,6 149,3<br />

European Union countries 63,2 81,6 111,4 165,2 188,5<br />

Organization of Economic Co- operation<br />

and Development countries 155,6 212,4 272 360,7 423,1<br />

Total Imports 795,5 1141,2 1845,6 2490 3677,8<br />

Of which:<br />

CIS countries 292,2 370,1 654,9 996,8 1401,5<br />

Black Sea Economic Cooperation<br />

Organization countries 389,3 499,4 853,2 1295,3 1953<br />

GUAM 139,6 175 300,5 456,8 642,1<br />

European Union countries 232,3 409,4 604,4 627,4 947,9<br />

Organization of Economic Co- operation<br />

and Development countries 411,4 625,3 946,8 1094 1709<br />

The main market for Georgian products is still the CIS. During the past few years the CIS<br />

and the EU have accounted for more than 70% of Georgia’s registered imports. Several<br />

factors and parameters related to the prospective economic development of the country<br />

provide sufficient grounds for dynamic expansion of export and import flows in Georgia.<br />

However, Georgia needs to diversify its export markets, which seems eminently possible<br />

through full utilization of its multilateral and bilateral trade arrangements as well as through<br />

the production of internationally competitive products.<br />

42


Table 4-11 Commodity positions by exports and import in 2006<br />

Commodity positions<br />

Major commodity positions by exports in 2006<br />

thsd. USD<br />

% in total<br />

exports<br />

2005 2006 2005 2006<br />

Total Exports 865454 992544 100 100<br />

Of which:<br />

Ferro- alloys 80181 89792 9,3 9<br />

Copper ores and concentrates 36386 79536 4,2 8<br />

Ferrous waste and scrap; remelting scrap ingots<br />

of iron or steel 84223 72427 9,7 7,3<br />

Other nuts, fresh or dried 70298 56567 8,1 5,7<br />

Motor cars 17915 50635 2,1 5,1<br />

Other aircraft; spacecraft and spacecraft launch<br />

vehicles 69025 49737 8 5<br />

Gold unwrought or in semimanufactured forms,<br />

or in powder form 34743 49371 4 5<br />

Mineral or chemical fertilizers, nitrogenous 35839 46631 4,1 4,7<br />

Wine of fresh grapes 81329 41051 9,4 4,1<br />

Copper waste and scrap 11503 30161 1,3 3<br />

Other products 344013 426636 39,7 43<br />

Commodity positions<br />

Major commodity positions by imports in 2006<br />

thsd. USD<br />

% in total<br />

imports<br />

2005 2006 2005 2006<br />

Total Imports 2489953 3677793 100 100<br />

Of which:<br />

Petroleum and petroleum oils 336286 443103 13,5 12<br />

Motor cars 178530 295322 7,2 8<br />

Petroleum gases and other gaseous<br />

hydrocarbons 90849 213082 3,6 5,8<br />

Medicaments put up in measured doses 92469 114545 3,7 3,1<br />

Wheat and meslin 45130 99063 1,8 2,7<br />

Sugar 78194 65589 3,1 1,8<br />

Transmission apparatus for radiotelegraphy,<br />

radio- broadcasting or television 27083 58727 1,1 1,6<br />

Automatic data processing machines and<br />

units thereof 22443 46444 0,9 1,3<br />

Motor vehicles for the transport of goods 23479 39296 0,9 1,1<br />

Chocolate and other food preparations<br />

containing cocoa 24821 33694 1 0,9<br />

Other products 1570669 2268928 63,1 61,7<br />

Georgian exports are partially concentrated on low value-added commodities such as<br />

ferrous metals, copper, aluminum, iron steel and mineral fuels. However, the dynamics of<br />

export seems to indicate that the concentration of exports on low value-added<br />

commodities will decrease gradually over time.<br />

43


4.7. Key industries of Tbilisi economy.<br />

Hotels<br />

Chart 4-5 Turnover and employment in hotels in regions in 2006<br />

Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

Hotels turnover in regions in mln GEL in 2006<br />

63,6<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

Percent<br />

Over 80% of revenue in<br />

the hotel industry is<br />

generated in Tbilisi.<br />

Two out of other<br />

regions of Georgia, i.e.<br />

Adjara and Mtsheta<br />

generate app. 10% of<br />

the turnover. The last<br />

10% are generated by<br />

the remaining regions.<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

7,5<br />

3,4<br />

Tbilisi Adjara Mtsheta<br />

Mtianeti<br />

0,7 0,4 0,1 0,1<br />

Guria Imereti Kakheti Racha<br />

Lekhumi<br />

0%<br />

4 000<br />

3 000<br />

Hotels employment in regions in 2006<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

Also, the employment in<br />

the hotel industry is the<br />

highest in Tbilisi, but<br />

Adjar and Mtshet are<br />

catching up.<br />

Employment<br />

2 000<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

Percent<br />

1 000<br />

1 668<br />

20%<br />

1 053<br />

0<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Adjara<br />

295 264<br />

142<br />

60 55 40 30 29 28<br />

0%<br />

Mtsheta Mtianeti<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Imereti<br />

Guria<br />

Kakheti<br />

Kvemo Kartli<br />

44


Construction<br />

Chart 4-6 Turnover and employment in construction in regions in 2006<br />

Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />

1 200<br />

1 000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

Construction turnover in regions in 2006<br />

760<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

Percent<br />

In 2006 Tbilisi saw<br />

the highest values in<br />

Georgia of both the<br />

turnover and the<br />

employment in<br />

construction industry<br />

200<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

80<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Adjara<br />

44 42 37 35 21 18 16 6 4<br />

0%<br />

Imereti<br />

Guria<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

Kvemo Kartli<br />

Kakheti turn<br />

Employment<br />

50 000<br />

40 000<br />

30 000<br />

20 000<br />

Construction employment in regions in 2006<br />

100%<br />

75%<br />

50%<br />

Percent<br />

The construction<br />

industry in Tbilisi<br />

generated almost<br />

80% of total turnover<br />

and employed about<br />

60% of all the<br />

construction workers.<br />

10 000<br />

23 513<br />

25%<br />

0<br />

Kvemo Kartli<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Tbilisi<br />

3 553 3 215 2 617 1 852 1 624 1 322 1 121 682 484 359<br />

Adjara<br />

0%<br />

Imereti<br />

Kakheti<br />

Guria<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

45


Trade<br />

Chart 4-7 Turnover and employment in enterprises of trade in regions in 2006<br />

Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />

6 000<br />

5 000<br />

4 000<br />

3 000<br />

2 000<br />

Turnover in enterprises of trade, repair of<br />

vehicles, personal & household goods in regions<br />

in 2006<br />

3 693<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

Percent<br />

Also in the trade<br />

sector Tbilisi has a<br />

leading role in the<br />

regions of Georgia.<br />

About 70% of total<br />

turnover in the trade<br />

sector are<br />

generated in Tbilisi<br />

1 000<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

Tbilisi<br />

422<br />

272 194 192 146 92 86 38 22 5<br />

0%<br />

Adjara<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Guria turn<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

Imereti<br />

Kakheti<br />

Kvemo Kartlii<br />

Employment<br />

50 000<br />

40 000<br />

30 000<br />

20 000<br />

10 000<br />

Employment in enterprises of trade, repair of<br />

vehicles, personal & household goods in<br />

regions in 2006<br />

24 310<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

Percent<br />

Approximately 50%<br />

of people working in<br />

the trade sector are<br />

employed in Tbilisi.<br />

The fact that the<br />

employment in other<br />

parts of Georgia is<br />

rather high in relation<br />

to the declared<br />

income means that a<br />

lot of people in<br />

Georgia deal with<br />

trade to satisfy their<br />

elementary needs<br />

0<br />

Kvemo Kartli<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Guria_empl<br />

Tbilisi<br />

6 378 4 714 3 647 2 880 2 777 1 707 1 168 882 728 362<br />

Imereti<br />

Adjara<br />

0%<br />

Kakheti<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />

46


Industry<br />

Chart 4-8 Turnover and employment in Industry in regions in 2006<br />

Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />

4 000<br />

3 000<br />

2 000<br />

1 000<br />

Industry turnover in regions in 2006<br />

1 409<br />

100%<br />

75%<br />

50%<br />

25%<br />

Percent<br />

In the industry sector<br />

Tbilisi has a leading role<br />

in the regions of<br />

Georgia.<br />

Over 40% of revenue in<br />

the industry is generated<br />

in Tbilisi. One out of<br />

other regions of<br />

Georgia, i.e. Kvemo<br />

Kartli generate app.<br />

Over 20% of the<br />

turnover. The last 40%<br />

are generated by the<br />

remaining regions.<br />

785<br />

0<br />

276 237<br />

104 99 82 73 64 36 29 13<br />

0%<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Abkhazja<br />

Guria<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

Imereti<br />

Adjara<br />

Kakheti<br />

Kvemo Kartli<br />

Employment<br />

100 000<br />

80 000<br />

60 000<br />

40 000<br />

Industry employment in regions in 2006<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

Percent<br />

The employment in the<br />

industry is the highest in<br />

Tbilisi, and generates<br />

over 40% of industry<br />

employment in Georgia.<br />

Other leading in<br />

employment regions are<br />

Imereti and Kvemo Kartli<br />

and generates no more<br />

than 20% each.<br />

40%<br />

20 000<br />

35 137<br />

20%<br />

0<br />

Kvemo Kartli<br />

Shida Kartli<br />

Abkhazja<br />

Samtshe Javaketi<br />

Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />

Samegrelo Zemo<br />

Tbilisi<br />

13 999<br />

10 763<br />

5 630 4 813 4 543 3 042 1 892 1 821 1 215 880 497<br />

Imereti<br />

Adjara<br />

0%<br />

Kakheti<br />

Guria<br />

Racha Lekhumi<br />

47


A thorough analysis of the tourist, construction, industry and trade clusters gives a clear<br />

picture of the situation and the processes that are taking place in the local economy of<br />

Tbilisi. The importance of the examined clusters can demonstrated by means of the<br />

following conclusions:<br />

- the examined clusters generate locally almost 80% of the national turnover in these<br />

clusters;<br />

- the employment in the examined clusters accounts for 50% - 80% of the total<br />

employment in Georgia;<br />

- a significant rise in the turnover volume (it almost doubled both nationally and in Tbilisi) is<br />

a common tendency for all the clusters, particularly in the observed period of 2004-2006;<br />

- due to the dynamic growth of the examined markets a change in the employment took<br />

place in each of them in the period of 2004-2006. The number of the jobs in the<br />

construction cluster almost doubled (not in the last year, though). After the period of falling<br />

figures since 2004 the industry cluster has been providing 10% more jobs annually and it<br />

is a cluster that generates the highest employment among the examined markets. Also<br />

the employment in the hotel industry has been growing since 2003 at a rate of 10% per<br />

year. The market of trade, repair of vehicles, personal and household goods, after a<br />

period of 2001 – 2005 when the employment was growing, has reduced its workforce<br />

below 25 000 people, i.e. to the level similar to 2003;<br />

The sector of strategic importance for the city economy is the banking sector. Although,<br />

when compared to other analyzed industries, it does not generate many jobs, but it<br />

employs staff that is better qualified and better paid than other business sector<br />

employees. This is why a descriptive analysis of the banking sector in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />

has been carried out as well. In 1994 a reform of banking sector, introduction of a two-tier<br />

banking system (National Bank of Georgia and the commercial banks). Commercial<br />

bank’s total assets comprise 31% of GDP and liabilities comprise 24%. The perspectives<br />

of Georgia becoming the financial centre for the region and regional banking would create<br />

a larger pool of capital to finance internal projects in Georgia.<br />

48


4.8. Identification of key problems facing City of Tbilisi economy<br />

Good outcomes reflecting the satisfying condition of Tbilisi economy, when compared to<br />

the rest of the country, results from the fact that the city does not face any competition as<br />

far as economic indices are concerned. Other regions perform much worse than the City<br />

of Tbilisi.<br />

The authors of new programmes of economic development have to consider the fact that<br />

their impact will not be restricted only to the metropolitan area of Tbilisi, but that they will<br />

strongly influence the national economy. The increase of economic indicators is built<br />

mainly on the growing production of low processed goods (e.g. cement, sawn wood) and<br />

on the export of raw materials (such as ores), which will not contribute to the economic<br />

growth and increased competitiveness on foreign markets. Also, these segments will not<br />

attract technology transfer and will not generate new, competitive products.<br />

As a result of economy transformation Tbilisi lost its traditional industries that were<br />

generating incomes and workplaces for decades. Schools, universities and supporting<br />

institutions were organized around them. Now, when most of old factories do not operate<br />

any more all these institutions should transform their activities or will be closed down too.<br />

To create Tbilisi new economy profile and face competition of global markets new city<br />

products should be identified and new institutional infrastructure should be developed to<br />

support key city development possibilities. Cluster networks should grow around<br />

competitive city products that will be identified. Workforce development programs should<br />

be created to support young people entering labour market and those who need to<br />

change or improve their qualifications. Schools and vocational training institutions should<br />

develop new educational programs to prepare qualified workforce for the new sectors of<br />

economy. To build foundations for knowledge-based economy the research institutions<br />

should offer companies new management and production technologies. The whole range<br />

of institutions is needed to offer funding to growing companies (credit, capital and<br />

guarantees). Business networks, organizations, consulting and marketing companies will<br />

help companies and their products enter new markets and compete with foreign<br />

companies. Public institutions should participate in the process of supporting promotion<br />

campaigns, offering good quality space and qualified workforce for all new generation of<br />

firms and institution, in order to build international reputation and recognition of the city.<br />

49


5. Vision<br />

<strong>TBILISI</strong><br />

offers wide range of services and opportunities to<br />

citizens, companies, institutions and visitors<br />

who are living, working, learning and relaxing in the city and entire region.<br />

<strong>TBILISI</strong> economic development strategy<br />

right place, right time<br />

DIRECTIONS<br />

1. Tbilisi booming regional gateway<br />

multicultural city, location of regional leading businesses<br />

2. Time for business in Tbilisi<br />

Support and space for business, money to start and grow business<br />

3. Tbilisi place to live<br />

Our home, Our neighborhood (ezo), Our community (ubani)<br />

4. Tbilisi hospitable city<br />

Improving quality services, provide needed info, prepared attraction<br />

5. People empower Tbilisi<br />

Future workforce, jobs for all, upgrade skills<br />

50


<strong>TBILISI</strong> economic development strategy<br />

right place, right time<br />

desired<br />

impact<br />

• Competitive companies<br />

• Prosperity of residents<br />

• Growing City revenues<br />

vision:<br />

Tbilisi serves residents and region<br />

strategic<br />

directions<br />

• Tbilisi booming regional gateway<br />

• Time for business in Tbilisi<br />

• Tbilisi place to live<br />

• Tbilisi hospitable city<br />

• People empower Tbilisi<br />

51


6. Strategic directions<br />

• Booming regional gateway<br />

Directing the new potential of Tbilisi towards this aim will first of all lead to stimulating the<br />

growth of the city as an internationally recognized metropolitan center. It can be achieved<br />

by means of the effective use and development of its existing research, cultural, sports<br />

and tourist potentials as well as by strengthening its role as one of the national service<br />

centers.<br />

Tbilisi, being a metropolitan area, boasts:<br />

- a significant potential in science and education,<br />

- important cultural organizations and institutions (a theater, a concert hall, a museum,<br />

art galleries, artistic societies),<br />

- numerous research organizations, business environment institutions (banks, trade fair<br />

agencies, chambers of industry and commerce, the market of real property services,<br />

business associations),<br />

- good sports and tourist facilities,<br />

- a convenient geographical location – at the crossroads of motor, rail and air routes.<br />

The problems underlying the choice of the program are:<br />

- weak links within the metropolitan area,<br />

- broadened administrative city limits and insufficiently developed metropolitan<br />

functions,<br />

- missing fast road and rail network,<br />

- insufficient transport links connecting the region and the country with the outside<br />

world.<br />

If Tbilisi develops in this direction, it will become a metropolitan area of regional, national<br />

and international importance as well as it will boost its competitiveness.<br />

The results will be:<br />

- better inwards and outwards accessibility due to the establishment of transportation<br />

system integrated with the airport,<br />

- strengthened potential of the metropolitan area due to the complementary growth of<br />

the main centers, especially in the field of research, culture and sport.<br />

52


Under these strategy directions the following implementation programs and projects are<br />

planned:<br />

Table 6-1 Programs and projects of strategic direction – Booming regional gateway<br />

Programs<br />

1. Access point to the<br />

region<br />

• Tbilisi on your way<br />

• Logistic centre<br />

Projects<br />

2. Regional meeting place • Calendar of regional events<br />

• Conferences organizer guide<br />

• Network of Caucasus cities<br />

• Caucasus media and info centers guide<br />

• Tbilisi convention bureau<br />

3. You can serves the region<br />

from Tbilisi<br />

• Doing business in Caucasus<br />

• Caucasus specialists data base<br />

• We serve Caucasus – Caucasus Yellow Pages<br />

• Financial and office centre of the region<br />

•<br />

53


• Time for business.<br />

Time for business means first of all the creation of good conditions for the development of<br />

modern economy of a regional character.<br />

The growth of Tbilisi depends on the competitiveness of local companies and on the<br />

number of new jobs. Unfortunately the city business life is not functioning well enough.<br />

The proposed development tendency results from the need to remove the barriers that<br />

local companies, both the existing ones and the set-ups, have to face. These barriers<br />

primarily include the lack of adequate infrastructure and very poor technology transfer<br />

from research centers. The aim is to provide the initial development impulse, trigger the<br />

process of starting new companies and to create the image of the city as an attractive<br />

place for doing business.<br />

The proposed solution results mainly from problems related to the local economy such<br />

as:<br />

- insufficiently developed network of business environment institutions and the lack of<br />

coordinated activities as well as the unconsolidated business community,<br />

- no coherent system of information about services, support programs and investment<br />

opportunities,<br />

- poor competitiveness of companies, the lack of innovation improvement system and<br />

the system of new technology inflow,<br />

- poor access to starting capital,<br />

- no leading sector that would be a driving power for the city.<br />

The undertaken initiatives will meet the needs of Tbilisi companies to maintain their<br />

position on the market and increase their competitiveness, create favorable conditions<br />

for stimulating business activity of local citizens as well as encourage business<br />

organizations to build a strong regional business center. The above will lead to the<br />

following results:<br />

- the increased number of companies,<br />

- introduction and the use of new technologies in production and management,<br />

- more jobs in the SME sector,<br />

- the inflow of companies from the rest of the region.<br />

The main planned initiatives are:<br />

- the establishment and development of institutions specializing in promoting<br />

entrepreneurship and innovation,<br />

- building the infrastructure for business growth,<br />

- encouraging new jobs creation,<br />

- establishing institutions that support entrepreneurship.<br />

54


Under these strategy directions the following implementation programs and projects are<br />

planned:<br />

Table 6-2 Programs and projects of strategic direction – Time for business<br />

Programs<br />

1. We support your<br />

business<br />

Projects<br />

• We help you to start and grow your business<br />

• We ask you about your problems and analyze<br />

issues you face - Business attitude surveys and<br />

analyses<br />

• We offer you information you need - Reports<br />

and business profiles<br />

• We support development of promising clusters -<br />

Clusters development<br />

• We build digital platform for our businesses<br />

• We talk directly with business community -<br />

Business round tables<br />

2. Space for your business • You can find a place to start business –<br />

Incubator<br />

• Space for your growing service company -<br />

Office units<br />

• Space for your industrial firm - Industrial units<br />

• Home of new technologies - Technology park<br />

• If you want to buy parcel to build your own real<br />

estate<br />

3. Money to start and grow<br />

your business<br />

4. Attracting Tbilisi to<br />

investors<br />

• Grants and micro credits to start business<br />

• Loans to grow business<br />

• Credit guaranties<br />

• Conferences and fairs<br />

• Targeted promotion campaigns<br />

• Investors you are our gests – one stop shop<br />

55


• A place to live.<br />

The main objectives set to follow the chosen strategic city development direction are as<br />

follows: to create conditions for a comprehensive development for Tbilisi residents, to<br />

encourage their identification with the city as well as to create a modern and functional<br />

urban space.<br />

The quality of local residents’ life depends on their dwelling conditions, natural<br />

environment and the accessibility of modern communal infrastructure. The existing<br />

housing resources do not provide every family with a separate apartment. However, the<br />

actual deficit may turn out to be larger because many apartment blocks have to be pulled<br />

down due to their technical state or land development works (new roads and others).<br />

Also, a tendency has been observed for the families to shrink in size. The city is facing<br />

the problem of recapitalization of housing and infrastructural resources. It also has a large<br />

share of poor quality urban space. These are mainly worn out buildings with insufficient<br />

facilities. Some of them are in danger of collapsing and need to be immediately pulled<br />

down. In order to lessen the housing deficit and improve local dwelling conditions it is<br />

necessary to build new houses and to modernize most of the existing ones, taking into<br />

consideration the need to upgrade the urban space and technical standards. What is<br />

more, some of the residents have limited access to water supply and disposal facilities. It<br />

seems absolutely necessary to invest in this sector in order to make the city function<br />

smoothly and enhance the local quality of life.<br />

The problems underlying the choice of the program are:<br />

- a growing number of families whose situation, mainly the material one, prevents them<br />

from maintaining their own apartment, which results in an increased demand for social<br />

housing,<br />

- insufficient supply of housing for moderate income families and young people,<br />

- arrears in renovating the city material property (housing and infrastructural<br />

resources), which has led to worsening local everyday living conditions as well as has<br />

triggered some undesirable social phenomena,<br />

- the need to revitalize and transform much of the urban functional space,<br />

- insufficient technical infrastructure in the developed areas and in the areas to be<br />

developed in future, which is hindering new constructions,<br />

- poor offer of attractive construction lots directed to high income residents,<br />

- downgraded natural environment resources.<br />

The primary objective is to improve the quality of life in Tbilisi and to increase the<br />

attractiveness of dwellings. Once this objective has been realized, the housing deficit will<br />

decrease, its quality will improve, the number of migrants will be reduced and the local<br />

economy will grow. The proposed activities are oriented at investors (the individual ones,<br />

developers, housing cooperatives, real estate and city managers, the communal<br />

infrastructure managers) and at all those who would like to settle down in Tbilisi.<br />

56


The initiatives will be as follows:<br />

- supporting the growth of housing market including the construction of apartments for<br />

rent to encourage market-related mobility and the construction of apartments for social<br />

housing purposes for the particularly disadvantaged individuals and families,<br />

- creating a reserve of developed land for housing purposes,<br />

- revitalization of degraded housing estates in order to upgrade local housing resources<br />

and to protect and renovate listed historic buildings,<br />

- supporting the transformation of post-industrial problem areas in order to animate their<br />

economic, social and environmental potentials,<br />

- revitalization of and enrichment of the natural environment resources and local leisure<br />

centers,<br />

- revitalization of the tracts of commerce and services,<br />

- revitalization of areas degraded as a result of communal, business and military<br />

activities,<br />

- creation of the program of incentives encouraging the revitalization initiatives.<br />

Under these strategy directions the following implementation programs and projects are<br />

planned:<br />

Table 6-3 Programs and projects of strategic direction – A place to live<br />

Programs<br />

Projects<br />

1. Our home • Improving your home (lifts, doors, etc.)<br />

• Coo financing for roof, door, lift and roof<br />

discharging pipes repairs<br />

• Coo financing of energy efficiency<br />

improvements<br />

• Buying new home<br />

• Buy your first apartment<br />

• We will help you to buy new apartment<br />

when you can’t live in your current flat<br />

2. Our neighborhood (ezo) • Great place to live<br />

• Coo financing for technical infrastructure<br />

• Coo financing for recreational<br />

infrastructure<br />

• Creating public meeting place and<br />

cultural facilities<br />

3. Our community (ubani) • Better services for residents<br />

• We are living together<br />

57


• The hospitable city.<br />

Culture and tourism are one of the basic elements of Tbilisi attractiveness. They are also<br />

one of the main factors determining the local quality of life and settlement decisions. This<br />

is why in the effort to make Tbilisi a friendly and hospitable city it is so important to take<br />

advantage of its cultural resources and create a system that would help to recognize and<br />

promote the city internationally and to initiate a dialogue of cultures in the region while<br />

maintaining specific symbols, values and tradition brought in by the rich Georgian<br />

culture. It can contribute to strengthening Tbilisi’s position as a service center of an extra<br />

regional importance.<br />

Tbilisi and the surrounding area should meet the information requirements characteristic<br />

for modern metropolitan areas. A complex city information including an address book and<br />

the information about some of the local facilities and organizations is regarded as a mark<br />

of the city and is used to promote its image. It is also an important element of tourist<br />

promotion and a basic tool for tourism development. All the activities are aimed at a<br />

modern and integrated City Information System (CIS) for Tbilisi and, in future, for the rest<br />

of the metropolitan area.<br />

The undertaken activities are meant to strengthen the position of Tbilisi as a metropolis<br />

which is well founded in the culture of its own, of Georgia, of the Caucasus region and<br />

outside its borders. All the actions that substantiate and encourage new cultural initiatives<br />

and tourist attractions are expected to make Tbilisi a regional center of culture and<br />

tourism.<br />

The introduction of a new visual order will make getting around easier and safer for both<br />

the visitors and the local residents (information for pedestrians). It will also improve traffic<br />

(information for motorists), which should contribute to the city attractiveness and<br />

accessibility.<br />

Moreover, it has been planned to integrate the information about the city, to invest in<br />

place and infrastructure, to create a unique and recognizable quality, to generate new<br />

cultural and tourist products, to launch promotional campaign in the region and abroad, to<br />

build and strengthen the tourist potential and recognisability of Tbilisi.<br />

58


Under these strategy directions the following implementation programs and projects are<br />

planned:<br />

Table 6-4 Programs and projects of strategic direction – The hospitable city<br />

Programs<br />

Projects<br />

1. See what Tbilisi is • We provide you needed info<br />

• City tourism guide book<br />

• Calendar of events<br />

• Tbilisi tourist product info<br />

• Tourism internet info and booking<br />

page<br />

• Video materials<br />

• Study tours for tour operators<br />

• Target countries campaign<br />

2. Stay longer • Working in Tbilisi<br />

• Being a student<br />

• We are improving quality your services<br />

• Professional guides - training<br />

programs<br />

• Tbilisi hospitality – training for<br />

non professional guides<br />

• Tbilisi quality certificates<br />

• Tourism cluster development<br />

• Market analyses and customer<br />

services<br />

• Tourism product award<br />

• Tourism souvenir award<br />

• We prepared attractions you can in joy<br />

• Development of tourism paths<br />

• Development of tourism support<br />

infrastructure<br />

• Support for cultural festivals and<br />

meetings<br />

• Tourism infrastructure and<br />

facilities<br />

59


• People empower Tbilisi.<br />

This direction in the city strategic development will aim at maintaining the city’s business<br />

position on the Georgian market as well as at improving the competitiveness of local<br />

companies and encouraging them to offer more jobs. The activities under the strategy will<br />

promote employment and reduce unemployment as well as they will make local residents<br />

more employable.<br />

Basing on the analysis of Tbilisi workforce market some vital problems have been<br />

recognized: low employment rate, high unemployment rate and a low number of the<br />

unemployed people who choose self-employment. Main activities will focus on<br />

activisation of people who are unemployed or at risk of social exclusion and on<br />

supporting these businesses who create new jobs.<br />

This strategic development aim concentrates mainly on creating jobs for school<br />

graduates because when jobs are difficult to find it is mainly the young people who have<br />

just left vocational schools and have no or little professional experience who are at risk of<br />

long-term unemployment.<br />

The local system of education has become one of the factors generating unemployment<br />

among young people because it does not respond to market requirements. The skills<br />

structure of the workforce does not meet the demand since the system is not flexible<br />

enough and the educational offer does not reflect the development tendencies of the<br />

local business.<br />

Nowadays the employers require practical skills rather than theoretical ones and they<br />

want their future staff to have extra qualifications. Therefore it is necessary for the local<br />

schools to introduce into their curriculum student job placements in order to provide their<br />

graduates with more practical skills, which will make finding a job easier for them. So, it<br />

seems important for the educational organizations of all levels to promote<br />

entrepreneurship among their students.<br />

The activities in this field will contribute to the correlation of needs and expectations of<br />

Tbilisi business with the educational offer of local schools. The projects are also going to<br />

increase the graduates’ competitiveness on the local workforce market.<br />

The objective of this part of the development strategy is to decrease the number of the<br />

unemployed graduates of vocational high schools and universities; to increase the<br />

number of students doing job placements and the number of volunteers in local<br />

companies; to encourage companies to create more job placement opportunities for<br />

students; to improve IT technology level at schools – the beneficiaries of the project –<br />

and to supply them with modern office equipment; to increase the number and improve<br />

the quality of job advisors.<br />

60


Under these strategy directions the following implementation programs and projects are<br />

planned:<br />

Table 6-5 Programs and projects of strategic direction – People empower Tbilisi<br />

Programs<br />

Projects<br />

1. Future workforce • What the labor market will offer you?<br />

• Youth Survey<br />

• Workshops and debates on labor market<br />

changes<br />

• Education – business round table<br />

• How you can become a good specialist?<br />

• Carrere paths for most needed professions<br />

• Best pupils and students fellowship<br />

• Want you be a businessman?<br />

• Best business idea awards<br />

• Workshops and debates on new economy<br />

2. You can upgrade your<br />

skills<br />

• How to find a job?<br />

• Labor market information system with an<br />

internet portal and one stop shop<br />

• Jobs data base<br />

• Labor market survey<br />

• How to upgrade your skills?<br />

• Preparation of CV and interview with<br />

employer – workshops<br />

• Language and IT trainings<br />

• Support for school and training institutions<br />

preparing citizens for work opportunities<br />

• How you can upgrade or change your qualifications?<br />

• Data base on vocational trainings<br />

• Vocational trainings for most needed<br />

specialists<br />

• Labor fairs.<br />

3. Jobs for all • Financing for new work places.<br />

• City needs you .<br />

• You can take care for your neighborhood (ubani).<br />

61


7. Strategy implementation<br />

An important rule when implementing the Plan is to follow closely the adopted procedures<br />

and make sure that everyone does their job. The principle idea of this proposal is<br />

permanent analysing and drawing conclusions from completed tasks because they form<br />

the foundation for future projects.<br />

The list of the participants in the Plan development process consisted of the<br />

representatives of:<br />

• the City residents,<br />

• key business groups,<br />

• public institutions in charge of local development,<br />

• self-government officials, local politicians,<br />

• non-governmental organisations – especially the social and economic ones.<br />

Also, specialists, outside consultants took part in the works.<br />

Local administration has to nominate the Plan coordinator. The Mayor of the City himself<br />

and through delegated specialists is responsible for the formal organisation and the Plan<br />

preparation. He is also in charge of logistics and the subject-matter side of the process.<br />

In the process the works of preparatory and conceptual character were separated from<br />

the decision-making at different stages of the Plan development.<br />

The team organisation and the allocation of tasks were based on the rule that the selected<br />

groups of specialists performed all the works that required professional skills according to<br />

the best practice principle. The teams selected in such a way could quickly come to<br />

common conclusions. It should be emphasised how vast the range of problems<br />

addressed in the Plan was. The ability to synthesize problems is very useful in this<br />

process. Decision makers and stakeholders are not involved in document preparatory<br />

works - stakeholders consult The Mayor and City Council before they will take final<br />

decisions.<br />

By the City Mayor directive the following teams should be appointed to develop the Plan:<br />

• The City Development Council – stakeholder group,<br />

• Inter-sector Team of City Development Programme,<br />

• Working Team.<br />

Phase One – team organisation and procedure adopting:<br />

• appointing the Plan Working Team,<br />

• appointing the Inter-sector Plan Team,<br />

• appointing the City Development Council,<br />

• creating the consulting group,<br />

• adopting the Plan development procedure,<br />

• selecting techniques and instruments to carry out the works,<br />

62


• adopting a detailed schedule of the Plan development.<br />

Phase Two – the assessment of the development and competitiveness level of the City<br />

as the centre of entrepreneurship that provides its residents high quality of life:<br />

• collecting and processing information about the condition and perspectives of<br />

local development, including a series of surveys,<br />

• the analysis of the City’s condition in key areas,<br />

• the analysis of the City Development Strategy and <strong>LED</strong> program implementation<br />

results,<br />

• writing reports about the analyses,<br />

• conducting the SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and<br />

threats), identifying key problems and defining development priorities.<br />

Phase three – the Plan development:<br />

• the review of strategic objectives<br />

• defining the Plan implementation indices (input, output, outcome and impact) as<br />

the basis of the monitoring system of the city development strategy<br />

implementation,<br />

• adopting the subject-matter material scope of the Plan, including the initial list of<br />

the strategic implementation projects.<br />

63


Phase four – preparing the Plan document, consultations and the approval:<br />

• gathering implementation projects, their assessment and selection,<br />

• preparing the draft Plan document,<br />

• presentation, consultations and modifications of the draft,<br />

• adopting the resolution by the City Council.<br />

8. Strategy monitoring<br />

As it has been mentioned before, the resolution concerning the Corporate City<br />

Development - the document of a strategic character - should not end the cooperation<br />

among partners involved in its realisation.<br />

The Working and Inter-sector Teams as well as the City Development Council take over<br />

the responsibility for the Plan implementation and for its updating. The Council should play<br />

the role of a main consultative body for the Mayor and the City Council of Tbilisi in the<br />

process of updating the Plan.<br />

The conditions under which the adequate updating system will be applied strongly<br />

determine formal and organisational activities, define the Plan’s characteristics and<br />

regulate the Plan development works:<br />

• step-by-step character – updated annually,<br />

• duration 3– 5 years,<br />

• working on the Plan by means of standardised forms,<br />

• accurate and clear criteria of the implementation projects selection,<br />

• application of IT tools to create and update database,<br />

• sensitivity to changes in social and economic situation as well as in legal<br />

regulations,<br />

• stable procedures, instruments and collective bodies (the teams, the Council),<br />

consultations<br />

The updating should be performed annually – having in mind that not all the data will<br />

change in a yearly cycle.<br />

Phase I<br />

The cycle starts with collecting necessary information about the level of social and<br />

economic development, the strategy implementation and accompanying phenomena.<br />

This phase also includes surveys in business and social groups. Naturally, the more data<br />

is collected, the more reasonable further steps are. At this stage it is vital to determine the<br />

cycles at which individual data will be collected and to identify the sources where they can<br />

be found.<br />

64


Phase II<br />

As in every strategic programming process what should follow next is the analysis of<br />

strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and external threats the City has to face. It is a task<br />

that requires from the members of the Inter-sector Team a lot of effort and<br />

professionalism. The natural outcome of this analysis is the identification of key problems<br />

for Tbilisi development. Then, a conceptual work begins in order to decide on the ways of<br />

solving these problems, to define the priorities. These activities are performed by the Intersector<br />

Team of the City Development Programme and the City Development Council who<br />

define the development directions and recommend development priorities to the President<br />

of the City.<br />

Before the priorities are approved, the President consults the City Council commissions,<br />

local community and selected organisations.<br />

Phase III<br />

After the consultation the adopted priorities are publicly announced, which is an invitation<br />

to submit proposals of implementation projects. It is vital that the announcement of the<br />

priority development directions is addressed to all organisations and public administration<br />

institutions that are interested in implementing various projects within the announced<br />

priorities. The proposed implementation projects are submitted on standardized forms to<br />

the Working Team whose task is to compare the projects. Then the Working Team<br />

evaluates and selects the proposals. The evaluation and selection criteria are first of all<br />

based on their efficiency in implementing the adopted priorities and how well they are<br />

prepared. Then the shortlist is made of the ones that deal with the major strategic issues.<br />

After consultations with the City Council the list is eventually approved by the President.<br />

Phase IV<br />

The announcement of the list of the approved projects is the signal for the bidders to send<br />

application forms. The standardized forms helps to evaluate projects by comparing their<br />

main elements and to remain impartial. The applications are then analysed by the Plan<br />

Inter-sector Team who finally approves the projects that will contribute to working out the<br />

draft Corporate City Development Plan for Tbilisi based on the implementation objectives<br />

of the City Development Strategy. The Working Team writes the final version of the Plan.<br />

Then the President of the City consults various organisations and submits the Plan for the<br />

City Council’s approval.<br />

The implementation of the Plan requires a great deal of effort from all the participants. The<br />

course of implementation is monitored and continually adjusted due to changing<br />

conditions and unforeseen events.<br />

Timetable<br />

Every cycle begins with evaluation and gathering information about the economic and<br />

social situation in Tbilisi. All these elements are repeated. Professional evaluation of the<br />

City situation not only helps to identify the key problems to be solved in the next edition of<br />

the Plan, but also defines the needs of the opinion-making groups. It is easier to choose<br />

the best ways of public intervention if the conclusions from the analysis (the survey,<br />

statistical data analysis) are correct.<br />

As it has been mentioned, the Corporate City Development Plans should be developed in<br />

yearly cycles. When deciding when the works should commence it is reasonable to take<br />

into consideration the City budget procedure and reporting dates. It is important to<br />

remember about the deadlines of applications to financial institutions and organisations<br />

supporting implementation projects.<br />

65


<strong>LOCAL</strong><br />

<strong>ECONOMIC</strong><br />

<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong><br />

<strong>FOR</strong> <strong>TBILISI</strong><br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

DETAI<strong>LED</strong> ACTION <strong>PLAN</strong><br />

OF <strong>LED</strong> STRATEGY<br />

IMPLEMENTATION<br />

Tbilisi City Hall │ Economic Policy Agency<br />

Address: 2, Liberty Sq │ Tbilisi 0105, Georgia<br />

Tel.:(+99532)932314 │ Fax.:(+99532)932895<br />

E-Mail: economic@tbilisi.gov.ge<br />

www.tbilisi.gov.ge


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

1. Role of Tbilisi for national economy...................................................................................................... 4<br />

2. Changes of Tbilisi territorial structure in result of economy transition and strategy implementation 8<br />

3. Vision for Tbilisi Economic future ....................................................................................................... 13<br />

4. Strategic initiatives................................................................................................................................ 14<br />

5. Strategy implementation....................................................................................................................... 15<br />

5.1. Tbilisi booming regional gateway action plan ................................................................................... 15<br />

5.2. Time for business in Tbilisi action plan ............................................................................................. 19<br />

5.3. Tbilisi place to live action plan........................................................................................................... 25<br />

5.4. Tbilisi hospitable city action plan....................................................................................................... 28<br />

5.5. People empower Tbilisi action plan .................................................................................................. 31<br />

6. Strategy implementation principles .................................................................................................... 35<br />

2


TABLES<br />

Table 5-1 Tbilisi booming regional gateway – action plan ............................................................................................................................................16<br />

Table 5-2 Time for business in Tbilisi – action plan ......................................................................................................................................................20<br />

Table 5-3 Tbilisi place to live – action plan.....................................................................................................................................................................26<br />

Table 5-4 Tbilisi hospitable city – action plan..................................................................................................................................................................29<br />

Table 5-5 People empower Tbilisi – action plan............................................................................................................................................................32<br />

3


1. Role of Tbilisi for national economy<br />

City are the more and more powerful engines of the national and global economy. Two<br />

key forces - the globalization and the commercialization of new information as well as<br />

communications technologies - have been driving the massive changes and thus<br />

restructuring cities. Globalization is linked to liberalized trade and the opening up of world<br />

markets through organizations and agreements such as the Word Trade Organization or<br />

the European Union. Global corporations continue to expand their role on the world stage<br />

through expansion, mergers and acquisitions.<br />

Globalization would not be possible if there had not been for the explosion of new<br />

information technologies with mobile wireless communication, personal computers, and<br />

networks of internet, intranet and extranet. All of these have made it possible to manage<br />

facilities distributed around the world, for the labour to move more freely across national<br />

boundaries, and for the information, currencies and transactions to flow smoothly to any<br />

destination. As globalization proceeds, regional and national economies become more<br />

closely intertwined. National boundaries have gradually become less relevant as<br />

globalization and information technology have reduced the role of the nation state. Big<br />

metropolises with skilled workforce, globally connected businesses have emerged as the<br />

engines of the new economy.<br />

Globalization, and intensive competition which is integral to it, has led to a massive<br />

restructuring of regional economies. The widespread de-industrialization of cities,<br />

particularly of urban cores, is clear evidence of this. As the global marketplace expands,<br />

each city is forced to focus upon the few things that it is very good at, in which it can<br />

successfully compete at a global scale.<br />

This more recent phase of economic restructuring has been characterized by a<br />

transformation to a knowledge economy. The future quality of life in advanced economies<br />

depends on upgrading and moving the economy towards a concentration in high value<br />

added activities from any industry. The key is to focus on the high order, innovation<br />

based, high productivity activities in each industry. The quality of life and economic<br />

development, depend on making a successful transition to a knowledge economy.<br />

Unlike an economy based on traditional manufacturing and natural resource extraction, in<br />

which factors such as access to raw materials may have played a central role, the<br />

knowledge economy is driven by:<br />

• well educated and high-skilled workforce,<br />

• innovation – creativity, flexibility, research and development,<br />

• entrepreneurship – mentoring, networking, strategic alliances,<br />

• information and communications technology (ICT).<br />

4


On its way to becoming a regional center, Tbilisi’s relationships with the rest of the country<br />

should naturally be transformed. The role of cities as major actors on the world economy<br />

stage demands rethinking the whole approach to urban areas and their role in economic<br />

growth and improving quality of life. This rethinking is required not only within cities, but at<br />

the national level. City has not only the value of itself, but can mean even more in context<br />

of the whole region. The realities of a global economy dictate that all levels of government<br />

reevaluate their understanding of the role of cities, and their policies and approaches<br />

towards cities and towns. While each city is developing its own solutions, particular group<br />

of them should benefit from working together to develop and implement an integrated<br />

national, approach to advancing the economies of major urban centers.<br />

Funding and resources must now be directed toward supporting the transition to a<br />

knowledge economy, in the same way that the government supported the resource<br />

sector, and traditional manufacturing industries in the past. Central government<br />

representatives need to take into account the likely impacts of their policy and program<br />

decisions on urban economies. The emerging role of cities has been recognized round<br />

the world and is being exploited as a engines of national economic growth. A wide range<br />

of innovative initiatives and institutions are being put in place to more effectively respond<br />

to the changing context for cities.<br />

Good outcomes reflecting the satisfying condition of Tbilisi economy, when compared to<br />

the rest of the country, results from the fact that the city does not face any competition as<br />

far as economic indices are concerned. Other regions perform much worse than the City<br />

of Tbilisi.<br />

As a result of economy transformation Tbilisi lost its traditional industries that were<br />

generating incomes and workplaces for decades. Schools, universities and supporting<br />

institutions were organized around them. Now, when most of old factories do not operate<br />

any more all these institutions should transform their activities or will be closed down too.<br />

To create Tbilisi new economy profile and face competition of global markets new city<br />

products should be identified and new institutional infrastructure should be developed to<br />

support key city development possibilities. Cluster networks should grow around<br />

competitive city products that will be identified. Workforce development programs should<br />

be created to support young people entering labour market and those who need to<br />

change or improve their qualifications. Schools and vocational training institutions should<br />

develop new educational programs to prepare qualified workforce for the new sectors of<br />

economy. To build foundations for knowledge-based economy the research institutions<br />

should offer companies new management and production technologies. The whole range<br />

of institutions is needed to offer funding to growing companies (credit, capital and<br />

guarantees). Business networks, organizations, consulting and marketing companies will<br />

help companies and their products enter new markets and compete with foreign<br />

companies. Public institutions should participate in the process of supporting promotion<br />

campaigns, offering good quality space and qualified workforce for all new generation of<br />

firms and institution, in order to build international reputation and recognition of the city.<br />

5


It is of key importance for the city development to attract capital in the following areas. In<br />

order to improve the conditions of business activity and the quality of life it is most<br />

important to invest in technical infrastructure:<br />

• transport infrastructure,<br />

• telecommunication infrastructure,<br />

• utilities.<br />

In order to improve competitiveness of the economy the following investments in<br />

institutional infrastructure are necessary:<br />

• institutions facilitating access to funding,<br />

• institutions of labour market and workforce development,<br />

• institutions giving SME access to technical assistance,<br />

• networking and marketing organisations,<br />

• know- how and technology transfer institutions,<br />

• space for work with service provided.<br />

To set up new firms and attract investors business space is necessary for:<br />

• offices,<br />

• retail,<br />

• warehouses,<br />

• industrial units,<br />

• hotels and restaurants,<br />

• plots of land with infrastructure,<br />

• houses and apartments.<br />

The city can stimulate investment in these three areas in many ways. Some of these<br />

investments belong to the private sector, others will remain public investments. Part of the<br />

investments will be done by national investors, while another part of the capital will come<br />

from international markets.<br />

For the last twenty years we have been observing changes happening in the cities of<br />

Central and East Europe which have abandoned centrally planned economy and are<br />

joining global cooperation and competition. In the recent years in Georgia strategic<br />

investments in technical infrastructure have been done with both public and private<br />

money. Many international donors have started programmes building institutional<br />

infrastructure for the new economy. We can observe a boom on Tbilisi real estate market<br />

where, apart from housing estates, new office and shopping space has been built. New<br />

hotels, restaurants as well as factories and warehouses are being constructed as well.<br />

Some of the old industrial buildings in the inner city after renovation have been converted<br />

into moderate class offices and shops.<br />

Progressing economic reform and further political stabilisation will help Tbilisi go through<br />

the process of economic change, similar to the one experienced by the cities of East<br />

Europe. Since Georgia has joined the global economy and the skilled workforce<br />

resources in CEE have been running out, soon new investors will get interested in<br />

Caucasus and Tbilisi.<br />

Presently, Tbilisi sees processes typical for the second phase of economy transformation<br />

described above. In the following years we will still witness growing share of private<br />

6


investments in such areas as telecommunications, transport, logistics, trade, hotels and<br />

restaurants, offices, light industries and confection , media and entertainment.<br />

Due to these investments the city economy will gain capital, new organisational standards<br />

of production, management, staff skills as well as new jobs and the awareness of<br />

international markets.<br />

When creating long-lasting mechanisms of activities stimulating local economy it is a<br />

matter of fundamental value to find a partner institution who will initiate and coordinate<br />

development programmes.<br />

The local government needs partners not only among ordinary people, institutions and<br />

organisations in the City but should also find external partners such as banks, regional<br />

authorities and business organisations who can offer help in developing local job market.<br />

When implementing the economic development strategy for Tbilisi the following measures<br />

will be of key importance:<br />

• cooperation among the stakeholders,<br />

• establishing a municipal structure that is capable of generating and implementing<br />

local economic policy,<br />

• identification of priority projects being the foundation of local economic<br />

development,<br />

• starting cooperation with other cities that are undergoing the process of similar<br />

transformation by means of best practices,<br />

• encouraging local economic growth, which is such form of activity that requires<br />

specific skills and initiatives that are beyond the city hall’s traditional forms of<br />

activity.<br />

An important role in strategy implementation can be played by Economic Policy Agency.<br />

It is worth consideration that in the course of strategy implementation the Tbilisi City Hall<br />

department dealing with economic development could be transformed into an<br />

independent city agency provided with resources necessary to carry out strategy tasks.<br />

The Agency should:<br />

• employ a team of experts capable of project implementation,<br />

• develop a range of instruments to support companies and workforce,<br />

• have at their disposal the funds enabling them to realize tasks by means of their<br />

own earnings and subsidies for projects.<br />

A non-governmental organisation that is competent to perform such tasks, has adequate<br />

human technical and financial resources will secure sustained activity and will<br />

immediately react to changing conditions.<br />

When developing the Economic Development Strategy of Tbilisi City a workshop was<br />

held where the participants learned how to establish an NGO (foundation, association)<br />

and how to develop with local partners the local operation programme, methods and<br />

forms of raising funds for operation and project implementation.<br />

7


2. Changes of Tbilisi territorial structure in result of economy transition and<br />

strategy implementation<br />

The character, directions and pace of the city spatial development mostly depends<br />

on the impact of the political, economic and social factors. Such type of impact is<br />

considerably intensive during the dramatic changes in the public life, when evolutional,<br />

even character of the urban development is replaced by the “leap-like” change (alteration)<br />

and revolutionary or reformative effort finds its adequate reflection in the urban<br />

environment. World urbanism is familiar with huge number of such examples; and Tbilisi<br />

isn’t an exception. Moreover, because of its natural-landscape and historical-cultural<br />

feature, Tbilisi represents one of the best examples of such discrete development.<br />

Retrospective analysis of the spatial-planning development of the Georgian capital city<br />

affords to state the above mentioned, which is simplified by the sharply separated stages<br />

of the city history.<br />

(1) Feudal (Medieval) era is long-term period of thirteen centuries – from 502,<br />

when Tbilisi became a capital city until the turn of the 18 th and 19 th centuries when Eastern<br />

Georgia was attached to the Russian Empire. In this period the city was gradually<br />

developing on both banks of the river Mtkvari in the form of densely dwelled, compact<br />

residential area. Defense held a leading role in the city functions, which is shown by the<br />

city spatial arrangement reflected in the map of Tiflis (historical name of Tbilisi) drawn by<br />

Vakhushti Batonishvili in 1735. In this period Tiflis represented a city locked within the<br />

defensive walls, with small-scale settlement in the suburbs and gardens cultivated outside<br />

of the city. The center formed by the palaces, churches and caravansaries was located<br />

along the river Mtkvari; the resource of the city further spatial development was exhausted<br />

under the current conditions.<br />

(2) Period of the Russian Empire dominance (1801-1917) is characterized as the<br />

first dramatic “leap” of Tiflis spatial arrangement. City defensive functions are loosing their<br />

priority; a political task – creation of the leading political-administrative support for the<br />

domination of the Russian Empire in the Caucasus - is being highlighted. The city freely<br />

spreads up to the high terrace of the right bank of the river Mtkvari. Gardens of the King<br />

and Queen (nowadays Freedom Square and a part of Sololaki district) are also used as a<br />

resource of urban development. Planning of the new parts, on the contrary to the old<br />

feudal city, is regular and sometimes even without accounting the features of the relief.<br />

Many gorges running down from Mtatsminda are filled with soil; city engineering<br />

infrastructure and institutions’ system are formed, central functions and institutions are<br />

concentrated on the Golovin Prospect (now Shota Rustaveli Avenue). “Old Tbilisi”,<br />

practically is not included in the city planning innovations where, instead of ruined<br />

buildings, construction of basically new houses along the old streets is being held, which<br />

gives a name of “Double-face” to Tiflis in the middle of 19th century. In this period Tbilisi<br />

acquired such organic immanent feature as linear character of spatial arrangement, which<br />

mostly determines functional effectiveness of already accepted or ready for acceptation<br />

city planning solutions even till now.<br />

Incorporation into the city space the villages (Kukia, Chughureti) in the vicinity of<br />

Tiflis had a parallel character; for 1833 planning of the above mentioned territories was<br />

considered by means of regular network of the streets – as well as, the territory of outer<br />

Avlabari.<br />

In the 1860-70s Tiflis continued growing on the left bank of the river Mtkvari,<br />

which was supported by constructing the first in the TransCaucasia railway line – Poti-<br />

8


Tiflis in 1872. In 1883 this railway terminal turned into a draught, transit line – Poti-Tiflis-<br />

Baku. This railway line split the city space. It is significant that at first modern, often<br />

squatter-like urban growth was basically located on one side of the railway line, on the<br />

south-west side, but construction of the Nadzaladevi district generated a new problem –<br />

the need for city space integration, which has acquired an acute character for now.<br />

On a large scale, the fact that the city turned its back to the river Mtkvari – an axis<br />

of Tiflis economic and public life and its spatial arrangement - must be considered as an<br />

essential drawback of Tiflis spatial development.<br />

(3) A new third stage of growth and development of the Georgian capital begins<br />

after Georgia becoming a Soviet republic, but this period is not homogenous; it is divided<br />

into several stages.<br />

Under the conditions of rapid industrialization and urbanization of the country, for<br />

1930 was set an ideological-political and spatial-planning deadline of radical transition of<br />

Tiflis which was based on the doctrine of so-called “Socialistic Reconstruction”. The<br />

expression of that doctrine in Tiflis, as well as in other large cities of the Soviet Union, was<br />

“Tiflis Planning Project”.<br />

The project was developed in 1934. The planning project of Tiflis, the capital of<br />

TransCaucasian Federation at that time, did not set specific dates of implementation;<br />

initially, it was to be completed in 20-30 years. The city of 3 700 hectares became three<br />

times larger, expanding by 10.000 hectares and its population grew almost two times -<br />

from 420 thousand to 725 thousand. It is worth mentioning that two versions of spatial<br />

growth guidelines were developed.<br />

From the today’s point of view, it is very interesting that the project set the issue of<br />

assimilating so-called “Upper Tbilisi” – the directions of Tsavkisi, Shindisi, Tabakhmela,<br />

Kojori, Manglisi.<br />

The construction of Tbilisi-Koqsi railway had been already started in order to<br />

urbanize that zone, but its construction was soon abandoned. “Upper Tbilisi” was<br />

designed as a group of satellite settlements with their own industrial enterprises.<br />

The project was based on principle of functional zoning of the city space. Thus, a<br />

number of industries was concentrated in Didube, Ghrma-Ghele, Avchala and Navtlughi.<br />

The location of the railway line remained unchanged; and its thrift (economy) was<br />

basically developing in Didube.<br />

The center of the capital was considered at a traditional place – on the Square of<br />

TransCaucasian Federation (today the Freedom Square) and Rustaveli Avenue.<br />

New housing on the city territory was distributed in the following manner:<br />

- Old city (right embankment)…………………………………………………327 h;<br />

- Nadzaladevi…………………………………………………………………...430 h;<br />

- Central part on the left embankment……………………………………….380 h;<br />

- Isani and Avlabari…………………………………………………………….464 h;<br />

- Navtlughi……………………………………………………………………1.287 h;<br />

- Vake……………………………………………………………………………184 h;<br />

- Saburtalo……………………………………………………………………….610 h;<br />

- Dighomi………………………………………………………………………1.600 h.<br />

The project paid attention to regulating the river Mtkvari and its role in the creating<br />

spatial-architectural waterfront of the capital. Also, the arrangement of four dams – in<br />

Dighomi, Didube, Ortachala and Soghanlughi and in the river’s flooded cuts the launch of<br />

river transport was considered. The dams, besides their primary purposes (raising the<br />

level of water and producing electricity), would also serve as transport bridges. Besides,<br />

building of 6 bridges was planned, 3 in Dighomi, one in each Didube, Saburtalo and<br />

Avchala.<br />

9


In order to turn the city facade to the river Mtkvari the arrangement of<br />

embankments and, in some places, cutting into the river Mtkvari with green areas was<br />

also planned.As for the “Old Tbilisi”, the “Socialistic Reconstruction” practically meant its<br />

elimination.<br />

It must be mentioned that implementation of the plan of 1934 was stopped by the<br />

beginning of World War II; but some fragments of this plan were soon realized – forest<br />

planting on Tiflis trench slopes; limitation of the Mtkvari bed in the concrete dams and the<br />

arrangement of the embankments; cultivation of new gardens and parks; solution of such<br />

important city planning knot as the Heroes’ Square, the construction of the Circus Hill, the<br />

arrangement of Cheluskinelebi (today the Tamar the Queen street) bridge and street, etc.<br />

After the war, basically, the already begun and planned constructions were continued –<br />

the second row of Governmental House, building of Tea Thrift Trust (today the<br />

Intercontinental hotel), building of Coal Industrial Trust on Zemeli, etc.<br />

“Khrushchev thaw” acquired a powerful impulse to the spatial development of<br />

Tbilisi in the second half of the 1950s. As a result of housing construction introduced in the<br />

peripheral zones, communal flats were partly eliminated; housing stock structure met the<br />

needs of the demographic structure (“one flat – one family”). New housing policy required<br />

assimilation of new space; as a result of considering land as an non-economic category<br />

the extensive forms of city development were introduced, basically by acquiring rural<br />

areas.<br />

Such tendency became significantly stronger under the conditions of developing<br />

The Third General Plan of Tbilisi. “The General Plan of Tbilisi Reconstruction and<br />

Development” was passed in 1970 and it fully reflected the ideology of a Soviet city<br />

planning dominating at that time. In this case among the components of the ideology<br />

several are essential:<br />

o Considering Tbilisi as self-content, autonomous settlement;<br />

o Principle of locked labor balance;<br />

o Neglecting the agglomeration (metropolitan area) realities;<br />

o Territorial expansion;<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Extensiveness of planning;<br />

Hard vertical subordination of territorial units in the settlement system (cityouter<br />

district (suburbs) zone), etc.<br />

As a result, planners were forced to think within the frame of expanded<br />

administrative boarders of Tbilisi. On the contrary to the linear nature of the capital, a form<br />

of “ring-shaped roll” around Tbilisi Water Reservoir, of spatial development was proposed<br />

in the new general plan. Such kind of priority naturally caused generation of new,<br />

latitudinal directions in the development of Tbilisi city center.<br />

Tbilisi center continued its linear development; its basic axis was again up to the<br />

river Mtkvari; the linear center was formed in the following configuration: Freedom Square<br />

– Rustaveli Avenue – Merab Kostava Street in two directions – with branches to Vake and<br />

Saburtalo and tied by means of newly built road of Vake-Saburtalo. Parallel growth of the<br />

city center was observed by passing David the Builder Prospect into Didube, Akaki<br />

Tsereteli Prospect.<br />

Simultaneously to this leading tendency of Tbilisi center the second, specific<br />

direction – returning certain functions to “Old Tbilisi” – is being gradually developed<br />

basically, in the way of reconstruction and adaptation of historically formed urban<br />

environment. This trend was conceived in the 70ies of the 20th century, when for the first<br />

time in Tbilisi conditions the State Defense Zone of the Old City (1975), was introduced<br />

which was developed later and acquired three part structure – State (strict) Defense Zone,<br />

Development Regulating Zone and Natural Landscape Protection Zone (1985).<br />

10


Nowadays this second direction of the city center development plays a more and<br />

more important role. It is apparent how important it is to make a preliminary urban<br />

decision in the development of city environment: it is enough to say that such city forming<br />

“injections”, as the Saint Trinity Cathedral and the construction of the Presidential<br />

Apartments have radically (dramatically) changed the position of Avlabari district on the<br />

prestige scale and, consequently, the real estate prices. We should remember that the<br />

similar activities in the 1980s (the construction of “Metekhi-Palace”) did not bring a<br />

desired effect – the business and its environment were not ready for that at the time.<br />

Under the conditions of dramatic increase of traffic and the city population mobility<br />

a large-scale problem of providing latitudinal functional-spatial connections appeared. The<br />

point is that a basic factor hindering functional-planning development of historically formed<br />

part was its “strap-shaped” character which is determined by the existence of two,<br />

principally different, separating barriers – the river Mtkvari and the railway line.<br />

The general plan suggested the solution to lessen this problem – to move the<br />

viaduct linking Didube-Nadzaladevi on the axis of Vakhushti Bridge over the railway line.<br />

That proposal of the general plan was not realized in the Soviet period. Today, under the<br />

entirely new socio-economic conditions such “strap-shaped” character of the planning<br />

structure of the capital city of independent country not only makes it difficult to integrate<br />

various parts of the city by means of transversal links, but also makes “isolated” parts stay<br />

under undesirable conditions. This inequality is reflected even in such a summary<br />

economic indicator as different prices of real estate on both sides of the railway line. In the<br />

case of the river Mtkvari, if its role as a separating barrier is a natural, even organic factor<br />

for Tbilisi, the railway line belongs to the anthropogenic category, its course reflects the<br />

vision of the last quarter of the 19th century and is morally obsolete in terms of macro<br />

structure of modern urban territory. Such estimation within the city would only become<br />

more acute in connection with the development of the Tbilisi railway knot – considering<br />

construction of Tbilisi-Akhalkalaki-Karsi line, and simultaneously to the regulating of the<br />

geopolitical situation, opening the blocked railway direction, not to mention the idea of<br />

possible reanimation of the Trans-Caucasian railway.<br />

In these terms, the dismantling of the transit course of the railway line in the heart<br />

of Tbilisi and rational use of these newly acquired areas may become that powerful<br />

constructing impulse which Tbilisi has been waiting for a long time and which will bring<br />

new quality to its spatial-planning structure.<br />

Firstly, the expected empty area of railway economy, basically, in the Didube<br />

district with its space and technical infrastructure (including a subway line) will create the<br />

city planning preconditions for the development of a large business center (Central<br />

Business District - CBD) which Tbilisi has been lacking so far. Now, because there is no<br />

such a district in Tbilisi, business functions are performed in buildings offering high-quality<br />

office space but dispersed all over the city.<br />

Besides, the establishment of the CBD will have great impact on the surrounding<br />

area – its integration, the prices of land will rise and the land use character will change. It<br />

is most important for the revitalization of waterfront along the river Mtkvari which is one of<br />

the problematic and derelict zones for now in terms of spatial arrangement.<br />

What is more important is an indirect impact of CBD on the conditions of inward<br />

development of Tbilisi historical center, because, according to the principle of “shared<br />

vessel”, difficult to control developers’ intervention in the urban tissue of the “Old Tbilisi” in<br />

the zones of conservation of the cultural heritage will be moved to the CBD. As a result, it<br />

will enable the city authorities to conduct the reconstruction-conservation works in the “Old<br />

Tbilisi” in such manner that it will ensure its proper functioning and will meet the ICOMOS<br />

preconditions to include Tbilisi in the UNESCO list of world heritage sites.<br />

11


Thus, the creation of the new CBD will strengthen the positive trends of functional<br />

specialization in the territorial structure of Tbilisi entire city center: the representative<br />

center – Rustaveli Avenue, the tourist center – “Old Tbilisi”, the medical center – Dighomi,<br />

the recreational centers – Mtatsminda and Tbilisi Sea, etc.<br />

The concept also involves the development of technological park and logistic zone<br />

in the eastern part of the city, in the vicinity of the Airport and in the direction of Rustavi,<br />

where “new generation” industrial and logistic objects will be moved.<br />

Apparently, the restructuring of the entire city center must be based on the<br />

convenient scheme of infrastructure development, the implementation of which will be<br />

possible within a higher taxonomic unit – the metropolitan area, due to the establishment<br />

and implementation of the spatial arrangement defined in the Georgian Law on the “Basis<br />

of Spatial Arrangement and Urban Planning” (2005). Thus, the transportation<br />

infrastructure is crucial – first of all linking the outer city with the inner one by means of a<br />

highway constructed within the metropolitan area (supplemented by a railway roundabout,<br />

the extension of the railway line from Airport to Rustavi, etc.).<br />

The significant changes could be recently observed in the sector of housing, which<br />

is likely to become a clear trend. The early housing projects had an individual character<br />

and were persistently spreading towards prestigious districts (Vake, Vera). Nowadays<br />

housing estates (one family houses, town-houses) are more and more popular and there<br />

is a tendency to build facilities for services (security, sports, recreation) around the<br />

estates, including the attempts to create gated communities. As for the location of the new<br />

housing, developers are more daringly assimilating the districts that were earlier neglected<br />

– Didube, Ortachala, not to mention Avlabari district which is rapidly rising on the city<br />

scale of prestige and prices. First signs of suburbanization process should also be paid<br />

attention to, for example contemporary Didgori district territory has been incorporated in<br />

the administrative borders of Tbilisi.<br />

Tbilisi spatial order has significantly changed its structure after assimilating<br />

territories of Didgori district, yet this change has only a quantitative character. What will<br />

Didgori district add to Tbilisi in terms of quality, it will entirely depend on the urban<br />

development policy and documents developed on its basis, primarily, on the “Tbilisi Land<br />

Use General (Operative) Plan”.<br />

So far, almost fully privatized housing resources, the tendency of mass formation<br />

and the activation of Home Owners’ Associations have become a positive trend, which is<br />

mainly determined by the program that has been successfully implemented by the<br />

Citizenship and Integration Agency (Tbilisi Corps.).<br />

Thus, according to the above presented analyses may be made the conclusions<br />

that major aim of the contemporary urban development of Tbilisi is to highlight, develop<br />

and implement such partial and general and “leap-like” city constructing axis idea which<br />

under the conditions of strong economic competitiveness among the world and regional<br />

cities, directly or indirectly will ensure the role of this capital of the independent state as a<br />

metropolitan area as well as the center of South Caucasus. Such a vision sets<br />

significantly new and unprecedented requirements to Tbilisi functional and spatial<br />

arrangement, mainly in terms of structural and architectural solution of the city center<br />

system.<br />

Careful examination of submitted proposals must be realized within the frame of<br />

the “Tbilisi Land Use General (Operative) Plan”, with the participation of all the<br />

stakeholders and taking into consideration the principle of transparency.<br />

12


3. Vision for Tbilisi Economic future<br />

<strong>TBILISI</strong> economic development strategy<br />

right place, right time<br />

desired<br />

impact<br />

• Competitive companies<br />

• Prosperity of residents<br />

• Growing City revenues<br />

vision:<br />

strategic<br />

directions<br />

offers wide range of services and opportunities<br />

to citizens, companies, institutions and visitors<br />

who are living, working, learning and relaxing<br />

in the city and entire region<br />

• Tbilisi booming regional gateway<br />

• Time for business in Tbilisi<br />

• Tbilisi place to live<br />

• Tbilisi hospitable city<br />

• People empower Tbilisi<br />

13


4. Strategic initiatives<br />

Tbilisi economic strategy identify five strategic directions that will be the basis of strategic<br />

initiatives.<br />

Action in these areas will make Tbilisi a regional financial and service center creating<br />

comfortable environment for endogenous grow, attracting city to new investors, visitors<br />

and residents.<br />

<strong>TBILISI</strong> economic development strategy<br />

right place, right time<br />

DIRECTIONS<br />

1. Tbilisi booming regional gateway<br />

Access point to the region, regional meeting place , service center for the region<br />

2. Time for business in Tbilisi<br />

We support to start and grow your business, we create a space for your business, we<br />

offer financing to develop your company, we attract Tbilisi to investors<br />

3. Tbilisi place to live<br />

We create our homes according to ambitions of our families, we develop livable<br />

neighborhoods, we create strong communities, we build the city we will be proud of<br />

4. Tbilisi hospitable city<br />

Come and see what Tbilisi is, stay and experience what Tbilisi can offer you<br />

5. People empower Tbilisi<br />

Prepare yourself to participation in labour market, improve your skills, jobs for all<br />

14


5. Strategy implementation<br />

5.1. Tbilisi booming regional gateway action plan<br />

Directing the new potential of Tbilisi towards this aim will first of all lead to stimulating the<br />

growth of the city as an internationally recognized metropolitan center. It can be achieved<br />

by means of the effective use and development of its existing business research, cultural,<br />

sports and tourist potentials as well as by strengthening its role as one of the regional<br />

service centers.<br />

Tbilisi, being a metropolitan area, boasts:<br />

numerous research organizations, business environment institutions (banks, trade fair<br />

agencies, chambers of industry and commerce, the market of real property services,<br />

business associations),<br />

a significant potential in science and education,<br />

important cultural organizations and institutions (a theater, a concert hall, a museum,<br />

art galleries, artistic societies),<br />

good sports and tourist facilities,<br />

a convenient geographical location – at the crossroads of motor, rail and air routes.<br />

The problems underlying the choice of the program are:<br />

not sufficient connection within the metropolitan area and entire region<br />

broadened administrative city limits and insufficiently developed metropolitan<br />

functions,<br />

missing fast road and rail network,<br />

insufficient transport links connecting the region and the country with the outside<br />

world.<br />

If Tbilisi develops in this direction, it will become a metropolitan area of regional, national<br />

and international importance as well as it will boost its competitiveness.<br />

The results will be:<br />

better inwards and outwards accessibility due to the establishment of transportation<br />

system integrated with the airport,<br />

strengthened potential of the metropolitan area due to the complementary growth of<br />

the main centers, especially in the field of research, culture and sport,<br />

best location for financial center of the region,<br />

regional meeting places where international events can be organized.<br />

15


Table 5-1 Tbilisi booming regional gateway – action plan<br />

PROGRAM<br />

Access point to the region<br />

PROGRAM<br />

Regional meeting place<br />

Project name Problems and project description Measures Partners<br />

Tbilisi on your way People going to different parts of Caucasus region can travel through and<br />

stay for a while in Tbilisi.<br />

Travel agencies,<br />

Logistic centre<br />

Caucasus house -<br />

Tbilisi conference<br />

center<br />

Calendar of regional<br />

events<br />

Conference<br />

organizer guide<br />

Develop Caucasus travelers’ guide providing travelers with info about<br />

plane, train and bus connections, driving conditions, accommodation,<br />

travel agents and other needed data. Guide will be prepared in Georgian,<br />

English, Russian language.<br />

Development and renovation of Tbilisi Airport, new railway and road<br />

connections can attract Tbilisi to cargo service companies<br />

Make Tbilisi attractive as a regional logistic and distribution center to<br />

investors and shipping agencies serving Caucasus.<br />

-Companies delivering cargo to Caucasus region learn about logistic<br />

services available in Tbilisi.<br />

Comprehensive Conference Center will be the place where the most<br />

important regional meetings can be organized.<br />

Identifying potential Center locations can be involved in project<br />

development and preparation of feasibility study for the center.<br />

Visitors planning trip to Tbilisi needs to know when international events<br />

are planned.<br />

Collect and present a list of regional conferences, festivals, trainings take<br />

place in the coming year, updated on annual basis.<br />

Conference business is rapidly growing in the region. To attract Tbilisi to<br />

potential conference organizers all necessary info should be easy<br />

achievable.<br />

Prepare Conference Organizers Guide presenting Tbilisi’s possibilities<br />

and conditions for conference organizers.<br />

The guide will be<br />

available in printable<br />

version at city portal.<br />

Warehousing and<br />

logistic Tbilisi profile<br />

available on the city<br />

website.<br />

Project<br />

accomplished.<br />

The calendar will be<br />

included into<br />

different packages.<br />

The guide will be<br />

available.<br />

hotels, car rent<br />

agents, restaurant<br />

network<br />

Shipping agencies<br />

-Developers<br />

-City and regional<br />

entrepreneurs<br />

-Education<br />

institutions<br />

International<br />

organizations,<br />

public institutions,<br />

business<br />

organizations<br />

Hotels,<br />

conference<br />

facilities owners,<br />

service providers


PROGRAM<br />

You can serves the region from<br />

Tbilisi<br />

Network of Caucasus<br />

cities<br />

Caucasus media and<br />

info centers guide<br />

Tbilisi<br />

bureau<br />

convention<br />

Doing business in<br />

Caucasus<br />

Caucasus specialists<br />

data base<br />

Cities in Caucasus face similar challenges because of economic<br />

transformation.<br />

Continue cooperation with other cities in the region and partners from<br />

Central and Western Europe to exchange experience on economic<br />

transition. Organize exchange platform for best practices in the area of<br />

local economic programs.<br />

People staying working in Tbilisi needs easy access to different king of<br />

information about current situation in the region.<br />

Develop internet page with links to key regional resources providing<br />

service in English.<br />

Tbilisi should facilitate the coordination and communication between<br />

potential customers and suppliers of various services for business<br />

tourism. The. City will unite the representatives from the local tourist<br />

industry to develop common marketing and promotional activities.<br />

Establish Tbilisi Convention Bureau to promote Tbilisi as a place for<br />

organizing meetings, trade fairs, exhibitions and incentive trips. The aim<br />

will be to establish a body which will coordinate these activities and help<br />

to develop common business tourism products.<br />

To attract Tbilisi to global investors we should provide info about<br />

conditions for doing business not only in Georgia but also in other parts of<br />

the region.<br />

Provide international and Georgian businesses located in Tbilisi with<br />

information about legal businesses condition for doing business in<br />

Armenia, Azerbaijan and other countries in the region.<br />

International and Georgian companies serving different Caucasus<br />

markets will need access to skilled professionals that could serve in entire<br />

region or specific country.<br />

Develop internet data base for professionals and employers seeking each<br />

other.<br />

Minimum one event<br />

will be organized per<br />

year.<br />

Media links will be<br />

available at key<br />

Tbilisi’s portals.<br />

Tbilisi Convention<br />

Bureau established.<br />

Guide will be<br />

available at city<br />

website updated on<br />

annual basis.<br />

Cities from region,<br />

European<br />

partners, GTZ<br />

Media agencies<br />

- Tourists<br />

association<br />

- Conference<br />

facility owners<br />

- Conference<br />

facility service<br />

providers’<br />

- Hotels<br />

- Fairs<br />

-Chamber<br />

commerce<br />

business<br />

organizations,<br />

-Embassies.<br />

Ongoing activity. Chamber of<br />

commerce<br />

of<br />

17


We serve Caucasus –<br />

Caucasus Yellow<br />

Pages<br />

Financial and office<br />

centre of the region<br />

International and Georgian companies located in Tbilisi and entering other<br />

markets will need business partner providing quality services.<br />

Develop internet data base for professionals and employers seeking each<br />

other.<br />

Tbilisi is the best location for financial and service center that can serve all<br />

other parts of the region.<br />

Identifying potential location that can provide enough space for Tbilisi<br />

Business District (TBD). Develop concept and promote it to potential<br />

investors. Development of Tbilisi real estate market profile. Organization<br />

of Real estate promotion campaign.<br />

Internet data base<br />

provide info on<br />

ongoing basis.<br />

Promotion campaign<br />

prepared. Tbilisi real<br />

market profile,<br />

International<br />

conference for<br />

developers and<br />

investors.<br />

-Business<br />

organizations,<br />

-Info providers<br />

-Developers, -<br />

Governmental<br />

institutions,<br />

-International<br />

advisers.<br />

18


5.2. Time for business in Tbilisi action plan<br />

Time for business means first of all the creation of good conditions for the development of<br />

modern economy of a regional character.<br />

The growth of Tbilisi depends on the competitiveness of local companies and on the<br />

number of new jobs. Unfortunately the city business environment is not functioning well<br />

enough. The proposed development tendency results from the need to remove the<br />

barriers that local companies, both the existing ones and the set-ups, have to face. These<br />

barriers primarily include the lack of adequate infrastructure and very poor technology<br />

transfer from research centers. The aim is to provide the initial development impulse,<br />

trigger the process of starting new companies and to create the image of the city as an<br />

attractive place for doing business.<br />

The proposed solution results mainly from problems related to the local economy such<br />

as:<br />

insufficiently developed network of business environment institutions and the lack of<br />

coordinated activities as well as the unconsolidated business community,<br />

no coherent system of information about services, support programs and investment<br />

opportunities,<br />

poor competitiveness of companies, the lack of innovation improvement system and<br />

the system of new technology inflow,<br />

poor access to starting capital,<br />

lack of leading sector that would be a driving power for the city economy.<br />

The undertaken initiatives will meet the needs of Tbilisi companies to maintain their<br />

position on the market and increase their competitiveness, create favorable conditions<br />

for stimulating business activity of local citizens as well as encourage business<br />

organizations to build a strong regional business center. The above will lead to the<br />

following results:<br />

the increased number of companies,<br />

introduction and the use of new technologies in production and management,<br />

more jobs in the SME sector.<br />

The main planned initiatives are:<br />

the establishment and development of institutions specializing in promoting<br />

entrepreneurship and innovation,<br />

building the infrastructure for business growth,<br />

encouraging new jobs creation,<br />

establishing institutions that support entrepreneurship,<br />

offering space for business with assistance.


Table 5-2 Time for business in Tbilisi – action plan<br />

PROGRAM<br />

We support your business<br />

Project name Problems and project description Measures Partners<br />

Small and medium businesses are key players for development of Ongoing activity.<br />

diversified city economy.<br />

We help you to start and<br />

grow your business<br />

We ask you about your<br />

problems and analyze<br />

issues you face -<br />

Business attitude<br />

surveys and analyses<br />

We offer you information<br />

you need - Reports and<br />

business profiles<br />

We support development<br />

of promising clusters -<br />

Clusters development<br />

Provide young people with advice and information about business<br />

establishment procedures, development of business plans or financing.<br />

- establish one stop shop for user friendly advice for small companies<br />

- thru business partner organizations provide advice to local companies at<br />

every stage of the business life cycle.<br />

Independent from the aggregation of secondary statistic data on the<br />

condition of the local economy it is necessary to find out the opinions of<br />

people directly involved in business activity in that area, i.e. those who<br />

make investment decisions and create new jobs.<br />

Conduct Business Attitude Surveys:<br />

- to grasp the attitudes of business environment towards local authorities<br />

and local economic policy,<br />

- to learn about the employers’ plans concerning their development projects<br />

and possible change of address,<br />

- to make business groups and local governments understand each other<br />

better.<br />

Different market research analyses can help companies and develop own<br />

market strategies<br />

Conduct analyses of city and regional growing markets. Discuss with<br />

business community possibilities of join activities supporting expansion of<br />

Tbilisi based companies.<br />

Develop and strengthen the competitiveness of companies operating within<br />

the structures of identified clusters that, directly or indirectly, influence the<br />

economic and social growth of Tbilisi.<br />

Supporting the clusters will be performed through various institutions from<br />

business environment whose tasks will include supporting<br />

Business Attitude<br />

Surveys<br />

conducted<br />

annually.<br />

Analyses<br />

conducted and<br />

conferences<br />

organized on<br />

annual basis.<br />

Institutionalization<br />

of key clusters<br />

around<br />

competitive city<br />

products.<br />

- Business<br />

organizations<br />

- International<br />

organizations<br />

- Business<br />

organizations<br />

- International<br />

organizations<br />

- Business<br />

organizations<br />

- International<br />

organizations<br />

- Local<br />

entrepreneurs<br />

- Universities<br />

- Business<br />

environment<br />

institutions


We build digital platform<br />

for our businesses<br />

We talk directly with<br />

business community -<br />

Business round tables<br />

entrepreneurship, facilitating starting a new business (start-ups, spin-offs)<br />

and assisting them (entrepreneurship incubators, technology incubators).<br />

Business environment institutions, with the coordinative support of the City,<br />

will be responsible for:<br />

- creating favourable conditions for new technology transfer,<br />

- improving the quality of human resources in companies through training<br />

and consultation,<br />

- supporting cooperation links among companies,<br />

- building a cooperation network and animating innovation<br />

Information Community Technologies and telecommunication<br />

infrastructures are more and more important for future competitiveness of<br />

local companies in global economy.<br />

Develop digital platform – economic internet portal for Tbilisi based<br />

companies with needed info and e-businesses possibilities as a part of<br />

public infrastructure.<br />

Information exchange platform is the best way to identify joint projects<br />

between Tbilisi municipality and local business.<br />

The main task of the project is to: broaden and diversify the economic base<br />

in Tbilisi; organise regular meetings with Tbilisi’s entrepreneurs,<br />

municipality and Chamber of Trade and Industry and discuss actual topics<br />

for city development and recognize business community situation and<br />

needs, establish forum for direct cooperation between public and private<br />

partners. Expected results: regular information exchange between local<br />

business and municipality, Common projects could be developed,<br />

development of business environment in Tbilisi and trust between business<br />

and municipality<br />

Digital platform<br />

established.<br />

Quarterly round<br />

table discussions.<br />

- Business<br />

association and<br />

Private Sector<br />

Partnership<br />

- International<br />

organizations<br />

- Governmental<br />

institutions<br />

- Key city<br />

businesses,<br />

- Business<br />

organizations<br />

21


PROGRAM<br />

Space for Your business<br />

You can find a place to<br />

start business – Incubator<br />

Space for your growing<br />

service company - Office<br />

units<br />

Space for your industrial<br />

firm - Industrial units<br />

Home of new<br />

technologies - Technology<br />

park<br />

Businesses that operate in the incubator can take advantage of common<br />

administration, secretary office or information sources. Incubators will serve<br />

entrepreneurs that need space to start<br />

The incubator may serve as a tool of promoting certain types of business<br />

activity or stimulating its weaker areas. As a result, they can save a lot of<br />

money on starting investment costs and use it for equipment and working<br />

capital instead. In an optimal version this project can be combined with a<br />

business consultation centre and/or with project financing. From a financial<br />

point of view several methods can be applied: the rent paid by the<br />

incubator tenants can be refunded for a fixed period of time, or it can be<br />

calculated as a turnover percentage. In both cases the tenants should pay<br />

for communal services and share the administration costs. After 12 months<br />

of exemption from rent the rent should gradually grow until it reaches<br />

commercial levels after 2-3 years, which will enable the incubator to survive<br />

Young and dynamically growing companies need more office space but<br />

they don not have capital or credibility to buy or rent a commercial estate.<br />

Provide through partnerships with developers and non commercial<br />

organizations office space to growing companies within specific sectors.<br />

Tbilisi needs more space for dynamically growing industrial companies<br />

The objective of establishing Tbilisi Industrial Park (TIP) is to create an<br />

attractive space for business and investments that boasts of efficient<br />

infrastructure, low costs of facilities and of professional support services.<br />

Competitive local economy has to create corridors for transfer of new<br />

technologies.<br />

Through partnership with other governmental institutions and universities<br />

provide space and assistance to active in the area of knowledge based<br />

economies. Promote Tbilisi to global corporations as locations of research<br />

and development institutes.<br />

Business<br />

feasibility study<br />

prepared.<br />

Feasibility study<br />

prepared<br />

Joint projects<br />

identified.<br />

New projects<br />

identified and<br />

ready for<br />

realisation.<br />

Agreement on<br />

city participation<br />

in Tbilisi<br />

Technology Park<br />

development.<br />

Business<br />

-association<br />

- International<br />

organizations<br />

- Developers,<br />

- International<br />

organizations<br />

- Developers,<br />

- Governmental<br />

institutions,<br />

- International<br />

organizations,<br />

- Neighbour local<br />

governments<br />

- Universities<br />

- Governmental<br />

Institutions<br />

- International<br />

organizations<br />

22


If you want to buy land to<br />

build your own real estate<br />

Grants and micro credits<br />

for start ups<br />

Strong mature companies would prefer to invest in their own real estate.<br />

Improve the information and advice on investment possibilities. Develop<br />

strong partnership with a professional partner. Tbilisi real estate market<br />

profile. Promote Tbilisi to real estate and industrial investors.<br />

Providing easy access to cheap credits is an important element of business<br />

activity stimulation. Local micro credits fund is an independent organisation<br />

cooperating with the City structures.<br />

Tbilisi real estate<br />

market profile<br />

available at city<br />

portal annually<br />

updated.<br />

Info on current<br />

investment offers<br />

available at city<br />

portal.<br />

Micro – credits<br />

provided to local<br />

companies.<br />

- Developers,<br />

- Landlords,<br />

- Governmental<br />

institutions.<br />

- Banks,<br />

- International<br />

organizations<br />

PROGRAM<br />

Money to start and grow Your business<br />

Credit guaranties<br />

The project objective is to support the SME sector in their access to<br />

external financing, which should contribute to increasing their<br />

competitiveness, investment potential and employment. The benefits of<br />

establishing a loan fund are similar to the ones brought by a guarantee<br />

fund – better availability of capital for start-ups and relatively good loan<br />

terms. Good terms mean subsidised interest rates or replacing property<br />

securities with a form of audit performed by the fund. The procedures in<br />

commercial banks are very demanding. Few small entrepreneurs can meet<br />

their requirements. The principal aim of this project is to establish an<br />

organisation that, through financing small and medium businesses, would<br />

create solid basis for starting up and expanding business activity.<br />

The problem that companies complain about most often is the lack of<br />

capital.. A small starting-up firm has to find its own unique unconventional<br />

ideas, which is often connected with difficulties in finding capital.<br />

A guarantee fund is a way to overcome one of the most important barriers<br />

that prevents small and medium businesses from accessing funding<br />

resources, i.e. the lack of appropriate financial guarantee. Commercial<br />

banks do not find small firms with little capital attractive. The guarantee<br />

fund is an attempt to reduce the distance between the interests of banks<br />

(by lessening the risk and preliminary auditing of the client) and small<br />

businesses (by securing the bank credit). Results: increased business<br />

with/for the private sector, increased transparency of the local government,<br />

possible savings in the local budget, tighter quality control of products /<br />

Guaranties<br />

offered to local<br />

companies.<br />

- Banks,<br />

- International<br />

organizations.<br />

23


services<br />

PROGRAM<br />

Attracting Tbilisi to investors<br />

Conferences and fairs<br />

Targeted<br />

campaigns<br />

promotion<br />

Investors, you are our<br />

gests – one stop shop<br />

Conferences and fairs create the best opportunity to invite potential<br />

business partners and promote own products.<br />

Through partnership with government institutions, international<br />

organizations and business organizations city will support organization of<br />

conferences, business missions and presentations promoting Tbilisi to<br />

global investors.<br />

Direct promotion campaigns at targeted markets will attract specified and<br />

demanded investors to Tbilisi<br />

Identifying potential barriers for specific investors. Work with other partners<br />

to address these barriers. Provide targeted investors with info and advice<br />

on investments opportunities, available workforce.<br />

Easy access to office that will offer professional advice in management,<br />

finance, marketing and human resources to current Small and Medium<br />

Enterprises.<br />

Interested companies will be able to acquire information and receive<br />

assistance in complying with the administrative procedures related to<br />

establishment and running of their businesses. These services include:<br />

assistance to the managers in planning of their business, organization of<br />

courses, seminars, support of the business community through<br />

communication with the local administration, advocacy etc. The office will<br />

gradually become sustainable. The initial office costs will be covered by<br />

the municipal budget or donor funds. The establishment of this office will<br />

become a factor in improving the overall business environment.<br />

Participation in<br />

different business<br />

events.<br />

Certain<br />

companies<br />

agreed<br />

partners<br />

implemented.<br />

with<br />

and<br />

Agreement on<br />

city participation<br />

in one stop shop<br />

development.<br />

-Governmental<br />

institutions,<br />

-Business<br />

organizations<br />

-Business<br />

organizations<br />

- Embassies<br />

-Governmental<br />

institutions<br />

- Government,<br />

International<br />

organizations,<br />

- European Union<br />

programs in regional<br />

private enterprise<br />

center,<br />

24


5.3. Tbilisi place to live action plan<br />

The main objectives set to follow the chosen strategic city development direction are as<br />

follows: to create conditions for a comprehensive development for Tbilisi residents, to<br />

encourage their identification with the city as well as to create a modern and functional<br />

urban space.<br />

The quality of local residents’ life depends on their dwelling conditions, natural<br />

environment and the accessibility of modern communal infrastructure. The existing<br />

housing resources do not provide every family with a separate apartment. However, the<br />

actual deficit may turn out to be larger because many apartment blocks have to be pulled<br />

down due to their technical state or land development works (new roads and others).<br />

Also, a tendency has been observed for the families to shrink in size. The city is facing<br />

the problem of recapitalization of housing and infrastructural resources. It also has a large<br />

share of poor quality urban space. These are mainly worn out buildings with insufficient<br />

facilities. Some of them are in danger of collapsing and need to be immediately pulled<br />

down. In order to lessen the housing deficit and improve local dwelling conditions it is<br />

necessary to build new houses and to modernize most of the existing ones, taking into<br />

consideration the need to upgrade the urban space and technical standards. What is<br />

more, some of the residents have limited access to water supply and disposal facilities. It<br />

seems absolutely necessary to invest in this sector in order to make the city function<br />

smoothly and enhance the local quality of life.<br />

The problems underlying the choice of the program are:<br />

a growing number of families whose situation, mainly the material one, prevents them<br />

from maintaining their own apartment, which results in an increased demand for social<br />

housing,<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

insufficient supply of housing for moderate income families and young people,<br />

arrears in renovating the city material property (housing and infrastructural resources),<br />

which has led to worsening local everyday living conditions as well as has triggered<br />

some undesirable social phenomena,<br />

the need to revitalize and transform much of the urban functional space,<br />

insufficient technical infrastructure in the developed areas and in the areas to be<br />

developed in future, which is hindering new constructions,<br />

poor offer of attractive construction lots directed to high income residents,<br />

downgraded natural environment resources.<br />

The primary objective is to improve the quality of life in Tbilisi and to increase the<br />

attractiveness of dwellings. Once this objective has been realized, the housing deficit will<br />

decrease, its quality will improve, the number of migrants will be reduced and the local<br />

economy will grow. The proposed activities are oriented at investors (the individual ones,<br />

developers, housing cooperatives, real estate and city managers, the communal<br />

infrastructure managers) and at all those who would like to settle down in Tbilisi


Table 5-3 Tbilisi place to live – action plan<br />

Project name Problems and project description Measures Partners<br />

City visiting card The lack of investments in technical and housing infrastructure resulted in Improvements in Gangebeli, local<br />

the desolation of Tbilisi residents’ meeting places.<br />

districts. towaristestwo<br />

PROGRAM<br />

Our City<br />

PROGRAM<br />

Our home<br />

We care for the<br />

quality of our life<br />

We build our city<br />

Improving your home<br />

The City Visiting Card project involves district leaders and city residents in<br />

restoring the past image of the places they live in and in the development<br />

and revitalization of the public space that has been a traditional meeting<br />

place. The project covers the following streets: Rustaweli, Freedom<br />

Square and Gudiashvil Square<br />

The quality of life is a monitoring mechanism for the changes that are<br />

happening in the city.<br />

The survey investigates not only the opinions about the quality and<br />

availability of technical infrastructure but also about public services offered<br />

by the local government. The survey deals with such areas of the residents’<br />

life as public transport, health, safety, natural environment, leisure time,<br />

workforce market or education.<br />

Citizens wants to have direct impact on decisions improving public spaces.<br />

On the basis on annual quality of life survey and internet forum citizens will<br />

recommend the most desirable improvements of City squares, streets,<br />

fountains or recreation areas and facilities.<br />

Many communal houses has poor technical infrastructure. Local<br />

government has limited financial possibilities.<br />

Work with residents and towaristestwo in the districts. The City of Tbilisi<br />

participates in co-financing hard infrastructure renovation and improvement<br />

of : roofs, water pipes, elevators, doors, sewerage systems.<br />

Completed<br />

survey.<br />

Recommendation<br />

to the Mayor<br />

three<br />

improvements<br />

chosen on basis<br />

of the survey.<br />

Number of<br />

improvements.<br />

Research<br />

institute,<br />

University,<br />

public services<br />

representatives.<br />

Research<br />

institute,<br />

University<br />

Gangebeli, local<br />

towaristestwo


PROGRAM<br />

Our<br />

neighborhoo<br />

d (ezo)<br />

Great place to live<br />

Devastation and lack of public space for residents.<br />

In cooperation with residents City of Tbilisi is participating in Coo financing<br />

for technical infrastructure, recreational infrastructure and creating public<br />

meeting place and cultural facilities locally in the districts.<br />

Increased<br />

participation<br />

residents in work<br />

on creation of<br />

public spaces.<br />

Local leaders –<br />

gangebeli, local<br />

towaristestwo,<br />

residents<br />

PROGRAM<br />

Our community (ubani)<br />

Better services for<br />

residents<br />

We are living<br />

together<br />

Places for trade and services in the districts are poorly defined, scattered<br />

and devoid of modern sanitary facilities, which impairs their competitiveness<br />

and availability to the city residents.<br />

The project activities first of all include putting trade and service tractsin the<br />

districts in proper order. The area covered by the pilot project includes the<br />

block of Kalaubnia and Zulukidze streets (Sam Gori) as well as<br />

Mosulishvili, Khizanishvili, Omisgmerebie (Gdani).<br />

The degeneration of public life in large housing estates and the lack of<br />

integrating events has led to a situation where city residents do not form<br />

interpersonal bonds and their identification with their place of residence is<br />

poor.<br />

The project activities include co-financing grants designed to support<br />

organization of such cultural events that aim at integrating local<br />

communities and promote participation in community life.<br />

Districts<br />

identified.<br />

Social events in<br />

districts.<br />

Local leaders –<br />

gangebeli, local<br />

towaristestwo,<br />

small business<br />

representatives<br />

Local leaders –<br />

gangebeli, local<br />

towaristestwo,<br />

citizens<br />

27


5.4. Tbilisi hospitable city action plan<br />

Culture and tourism are one of the basic elements of Tbilisi attractiveness. They are also<br />

one of the main factors determining the local quality of life and settlement decisions. This<br />

is why in the effort to make Tbilisi a friendly and hospitable city it is so important to take<br />

advantage of its cultural resources and create a system that would help to recognize and<br />

promote the city internationally and to initiate a dialogue of cultures in the region while<br />

maintaining specific symbols, values and tradition brought in by the rich Georgian<br />

culture. It can contribute to strengthening Tbilisi’s position as a service center of an extra<br />

regional importance.<br />

Tbilisi and the surrounding area should meet the information requirements characteristic<br />

for modern metropolitan areas. A complex city information including an address book and<br />

the information about some of the local facilities and organizations is regarded as a mark<br />

of the city and is used to promote its image. It is also an important element of tourist<br />

promotion and a basic tool for tourism development. All the activities are aimed at a<br />

modern and integrated City Information System (CIS) for Tbilisi and, in future, for the rest<br />

of the metropolitan area.<br />

The undertaken activities are meant to strengthen the position of Tbilisi as a metropolis<br />

which is well founded in the culture of its own, of Georgia, of the Caucasus region and<br />

outside its borders. All the actions that substantiate and encourage new cultural initiatives<br />

and tourist attractions are expected to make Tbilisi a regional center of culture and<br />

tourism.<br />

The introduction of a new visual order will make getting around easier and safer for both<br />

the visitors and the local residents (information for pedestrians). It will also improve traffic<br />

(information for motorists), which should contribute to the city attractiveness and<br />

accessibility.<br />

Moreover, it has been planned to integrate the information about the city, to invest in<br />

place and infrastructure, to create a unique and recognizable quality, to generate new<br />

cultural and tourist products, to launch promotional campaign in the region and abroad, to<br />

build and strengthen the tourist potential and recognisability of Tbilisi.


Table 5-4 Tbilisi hospitable city – action plan<br />

PROGRAM<br />

See what Tbilisi is<br />

Project name Problems and project description Measures Partners<br />

We provide info you<br />

need<br />

Packet of<br />

We are improving the<br />

quality of your<br />

services<br />

We have prepared<br />

attractions you can<br />

enjoy<br />

Tourists, investors and city residents need a packet of practical information about<br />

everyday life in Tbilisi (financial services, transportation services,<br />

telecommunication, etc.)<br />

- City tourism guide book<br />

- Calendar of events<br />

- Tbilisi tourist product info<br />

- Tourism internet info and booking page<br />

- Video materials<br />

- Study tours for tour operators<br />

- Target countries campaign<br />

High quality tourist services, supporting tourist companies by training programs,<br />

certificates of quality as well as encouraging local companies to group around the<br />

service packet.<br />

Project is a key condition for Tbilisi development and the growth of its<br />

reconcilability in the region and worldwide.<br />

- Professional guides - training programs<br />

- Tbilisi hospitality – training for non professional guides<br />

- Tbilisi quality certificates<br />

- Tourism cluster development<br />

- Market analyses and customer services<br />

- Tourism product award<br />

- Tourism souvenir award<br />

An increasing number of visitors, the needs of local community and the dynamic<br />

growth of the city make it necessary to make it more attractive not only for<br />

tourists but also for the local residents.<br />

- Development of tourism paths<br />

- Support for cultural festivals and meetings<br />

- Tourism infrastructure and facilities<br />

materials<br />

developed.<br />

Ongoing activity<br />

Training<br />

curriculum’s for<br />

targeted groups<br />

of developed.<br />

Feasibility study<br />

for new tourists<br />

infrastructure.<br />

New tourist<br />

products and<br />

facilities outdoor<br />

campaign.<br />

-Tourists<br />

association<br />

- International<br />

organizations<br />

- Hotels<br />

- University<br />

-Tourists<br />

association<br />

-International<br />

organizations<br />

- Governmental<br />

organizations<br />

-Hotels<br />

-Business<br />

associations<br />

-Tourists<br />

association<br />

- International<br />

organizations<br />

- Governmental<br />

organizations<br />

- Hotels


PROGRAM<br />

Stay longer<br />

Working in Tbilisi<br />

Being a student<br />

Foreigners and people from other Georgia regions working in Tbilisi need specific<br />

info on every day life and conditions as well as tax and labor market regulations.<br />

Provide people staying in Tbilisi for work reasons with info about taxes and<br />

money transfers, labor market regulations, living conditions, city services and<br />

recreation possibilities, renting a flat and other circumstances of every day life in<br />

Tbilisi. Guide will be prepared in Georgian, English and Russian language<br />

version.<br />

Students coming from other regions of Georgia and abroad need specific info on<br />

education and life conditions.<br />

- Prepare students guidebook in electronic and hard version, in the Georgian,<br />

English, Russian languages. Packet will include info on education offers, financial<br />

support, living conditions, city attractions and leisure possibilities.<br />

Printable<br />

version will be<br />

available at city<br />

portal.<br />

Guide will be<br />

available at the<br />

city portal in the<br />

printable<br />

version.<br />

Real estate<br />

companies<br />

-State and<br />

private<br />

universities,<br />

-Vocational and<br />

training<br />

institutions<br />

30


5.5. People empower Tbilisi action plan<br />

This direction in the city strategic development will aim at maintaining the city’s business<br />

position on the Georgian market as well as at improving the competitiveness of local<br />

companies and encouraging them to offer more jobs. The activities under the strategy will<br />

promote employment and reduce unemployment as well as they will make local residents<br />

more employable.<br />

Basing on the analysis of Tbilisi workforce market some vital problems have been<br />

recognized: low employment rate, high unemployment rate and a low number of the<br />

unemployed people who choose self-employment. Main activities will focus on<br />

activisation of people who are unemployed or at risk of social exclusion and on<br />

supporting these businesses who create new jobs.<br />

This strategic development aim concentrates mainly on creating jobs for school<br />

graduates because when jobs are difficult to find it is mainly the young people who have<br />

just left vocational schools and have no or little professional experience who are at risk of<br />

long-term unemployment.<br />

The local system of education has become one of the factors generating unemployment<br />

among young people because it does not respond to market requirements. The skills<br />

structure of the workforce does not meet the demand since the system is not flexible<br />

enough and the educational offer does not reflect the development tendencies of the<br />

local business.<br />

Nowadays the employers require practical skills rather than theoretical ones and they<br />

want their future staff to have extra qualifications. Therefore it is necessary for the local<br />

schools to introduce into their curriculum student job placements in order to provide their<br />

graduates with more practical skills, which will make finding a job easier for them. So, it<br />

seems important for the educational organizations of all levels to promote<br />

entrepreneurship among their students.<br />

The activities in this field will contribute to the correlation of needs and expectations of<br />

Tbilisi business with the educational offer of local schools. The projects are also going to<br />

increase the graduates’ competitiveness on the local workforce market.<br />

The objective of this part of the development strategy is to decrease the number of the<br />

unemployed graduates of vocational high schools and universities; to increase the<br />

number of students doing job placements and the number of volunteers in local<br />

companies; to encourage companies to create more job placement opportunities for<br />

students; to improve IT technology level at schools – the beneficiaries of the project –<br />

and to supply them with modern office equipment; to increase the number and improve<br />

the quality of job advisors.


Table 5-5 People empower Tbilisi – action plan<br />

PROGRAM<br />

Future workforce<br />

PROGRAM<br />

You can upgrade Your<br />

skills<br />

Project name Problems and project description Measure Partners<br />

The changes on the workforce market can be observed not only in Tbilisi but<br />

also in other parts of the world.<br />

What will the labor<br />

market offer to you?<br />

How can you<br />

become a good<br />

specialist?<br />

Do you want to be a<br />

businessman?<br />

How to find a job<br />

Information on the market trends, the demand for jobs and a platform to<br />

exchange information between employers and the local education system is the<br />

basis to build a resource of highly qualified future workforce<br />

- conduct youth survey organize<br />

- organize workshops and debates on labor market changes and education –<br />

business round table<br />

Young people need practical information that helps them choose their line of<br />

education.<br />

Development of<br />

- career paths for most needed professions<br />

- best pupils and students fellowship<br />

Motivating and awarding the most innovative business ideas among the young<br />

people gives an additional opportunity for the local economy to develop.<br />

- best business idea awards<br />

- workshops and debates on new economy principles<br />

The city residents, the young ones in particular, need information about job offers<br />

on the dynamically changing workforce market.<br />

Development of<br />

- workforce market information system with an internet portal and one stop shop<br />

- jobs data base<br />

- workforce market survey<br />

The report on the<br />

survey, workshops<br />

and debates.<br />

Consultation with<br />

business<br />

community on<br />

internships.<br />

Best pupils and<br />

students identified<br />

Targeted career<br />

paths developed<br />

Annual awards for<br />

the best business<br />

idea.<br />

A new web site,<br />

the report on the<br />

survey .<br />

-Schools,<br />

universities,<br />

-Business<br />

organizations<br />

- Governmental<br />

institutions<br />

-Labour<br />

movement<br />

organizations.<br />

Schools,<br />

universities,<br />

-Business<br />

organizations.<br />

Schools,<br />

universities,<br />

-Business<br />

organizations.<br />

Schools,<br />

universities,<br />

-Business<br />

organizations.


PROGRAM<br />

Jobs for all<br />

How to upgrade your<br />

skills<br />

How can you<br />

upgrade or change<br />

your qualifications?<br />

Labor fairs<br />

Financing new work<br />

places.<br />

A skill to present oneself to a potential employer and the young people’s<br />

capability to enter the workforce market is a basic condition to start a<br />

professional career.<br />

Development of:<br />

- preparation of CV and an interview with an employer – workshops<br />

- language and IT trainings<br />

- support for schools and training institutions preparing citizens for work<br />

opportunities<br />

- identify potential partner at city and government level for vocational training<br />

programs<br />

The collapse of traditional industries and the development of new economy<br />

based on modern technology has forced local workers to improve their skills or<br />

change qualifications.<br />

- Data base on vocational training courses<br />

- Vocational training for most needed specialists<br />

Job turnover, growing sectors can be the topics big community meeting<br />

Organize job fairs with workshops, presentations, debates<br />

Creation of new work places support local community and generate revenues of<br />

city budget.<br />

In cooperation with the banks and international organizations develop financing<br />

frame offering credits to SME creating work places for specified groups of<br />

residents ( low income, poor, aged people, disadvantage neighborhoods).<br />

Completed<br />

workshops.<br />

Info on trainings<br />

available at the<br />

web site.<br />

Job<br />

organized<br />

annually.<br />

fairs<br />

Credit framework<br />

developed<br />

Schools,<br />

universities,<br />

-Business<br />

organizations.<br />

-Schools,<br />

universities,<br />

-Business<br />

organizations<br />

- Governmental<br />

institutions<br />

-Labour<br />

movement<br />

organizations.<br />

-Schools,<br />

universities,<br />

-Business<br />

organizations<br />

- Governmental<br />

institutions<br />

-Labour<br />

movement<br />

organizations.<br />

Banks,<br />

international<br />

organizations.<br />

33


City needs you<br />

You can take care of<br />

your neighborhood<br />

(ubani).<br />

Social exclusion is an emerging problem for all cities facing transition from<br />

traditional economy to knowledge based economy.<br />

In cooperation with housing communities and utilities temporary work places will<br />

be organized to improve quality of life in deprived neighborhoods.<br />

Community based programs can generate work places for low skilled and low<br />

income people reducing poverty issue.<br />

In cooperation with housing communities develop co-financing scheme for<br />

creation a work places for local community members taking care for public<br />

spaces within housing districts.<br />

Number of<br />

workers involved<br />

in the program.<br />

Number of<br />

generated<br />

annually work<br />

places<br />

Housing<br />

communities<br />

utilities<br />

-Housing<br />

communities<br />

- International<br />

organizations<br />

34


6. Strategy implementation principles<br />

It is crucial for strategy effective implementation that strategy objectives needs to be<br />

agreed by City Government and also accepted by entire Tbilisi community.<br />

Each of five strategic directions includes different tactics that city government should<br />

pursue - new initiatives which weren’t finance from city budget before, new organizational<br />

and operational frameworks, policy changes.<br />

It is crucial that different institutions representing all sectors and levels of government, as<br />

well as business and community leaders, international partners will be involved in to join<br />

activities.<br />

Implementing Tbilisi’s economic strategy will require mobilizing passions, leaderships,<br />

skills and available resources of entire Tbilisi community and beyond including<br />

government and international organizations.<br />

Strategy implementation will be based on three main principles:<br />

- Commitment around strategy directions. Strategy directions should be<br />

communicated through all levels of city administration, so every person working for the<br />

City Hall or other municipal unit will understand her/his role in strategy<br />

implementation’s activities. City decision makers should discuss and agreed a priority<br />

fast – track activities under each strategic direction to be implemented in coming two<br />

years. Municipal entities should incorporate these objectives into development plans<br />

and budget requests for 2008-2009.<br />

- Develop partnership with stakeholders. City leaders and specialists should share<br />

this plan with other governmental institutions, business and community partners and<br />

international organizations supporting transition of Tbilisi economy. They should<br />

engage all potential public commercial and community partners about how to move<br />

forward on strategy directions.<br />

- Monitor performance and facilitate progress. Special role in strategy<br />

implementation will play Economic Policy Agency that will have to initiate, facilitate or<br />

directly realize projects that will be selected. Organizational and professional capacity<br />

of agency will decide how effective implementation process will be. To monitor<br />

strategy implementation efficiency and observe dynamically changing city economy<br />

Economic Policy Agency should truck measures related to strategy implementation<br />

directions and publish them together with annually updated Tbilisi economy<br />

competitive report.<br />

Implementing strategy city should be aware that economic environment will continue to<br />

change. After two years to face new challenges and utilize new opportunities City should<br />

review strategy implementation and update plan in selecting priority projects for next<br />

period of 2009-2011 years.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!