LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TBILISI ... - LED
LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TBILISI ... - LED
LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TBILISI ... - LED
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
Local Economy Assessment and SWOT Analysis ..........................................................................................6<br />
Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................6<br />
Tbilisi basic info......................................................................................................................................................8<br />
1. Demography ................................................................................................................................................. 11<br />
1.1. Tbilisi community.................................................................................................................................... 11<br />
1.1.1. Age and gender structure............................................................................................................... 11<br />
1.1.2. Education structure of Tbilisi population........................................................................................ 13<br />
1.1.3. Geographical structure of population............................................................................................. 14<br />
1.1.4. Changes in the Tbilisi population.................................................................................................. 16<br />
1.2. Workforce................................................................................................................................................ 19<br />
1.2.1. Workforce and economically active people................................................................................... 19<br />
1.2.2. Unemployment................................................................................................................................ 20<br />
1.2.3. Workforce........................................................................................................................................ 21<br />
1.3. Wages..................................................................................................................................................... 22<br />
1.3.1. Average monthly salaries by sectors............................................................................................ 22<br />
1.3.2. Earnings by gender ........................................................................................................................ 23<br />
1.4. Quality of life ........................................................................................................................................... 24<br />
1.5. Informal economy................................................................................................................................... 26<br />
1.6. Education................................................................................................................................................ 28<br />
1.6.1. Numbers and types of schools ...................................................................................................... 28<br />
1.6.2. Teachers ......................................................................................................................................... 29<br />
1.6.3. Further and higher education......................................................................................................... 29<br />
1.6.4. Occupational shortages and oversupply....................................................................................... 31<br />
2. Economic base and current economic performance. .......................................................................... 35<br />
2.1. Number and size of firms by sector;...................................................................................................... 35<br />
2.2. Numbers of full-time equivalent employees;......................................................................................... 36<br />
2.3. Investment .............................................................................................................................................. 38<br />
2.4. Start-ups.................................................................................................................................................. 39<br />
2.5. Export and trade statistics;..................................................................................................................... 40
2.5.1. Direction of trade............................................................................................................................. 41<br />
2.5.2. Trade Turnover ............................................................................................................................... 41<br />
2.6. Airport, rail cargo, passenger statistics.................................................................................................. 42<br />
3. Geographical map of the broader region................................................................................................ 45<br />
3.1. Georgian’s and Tbilisi neighbors ........................................................................................................... 45<br />
3.1.1. Russia.............................................................................................................................................. 46<br />
3.1.2. Kazakhstan ..................................................................................................................................... 47<br />
3.1.3. Ukraine ............................................................................................................................................ 48<br />
3.1.4. Georgia............................................................................................................................................ 49<br />
3.1.5. Armenia........................................................................................................................................... 50<br />
3.1.6. Azerbaijan ....................................................................................................................................... 51<br />
3.1.7. Kyrgystan ........................................................................................................................................ 52<br />
3.1.8. Uzbekistan ...................................................................................................................................... 53<br />
3.1.9. Tajikistan ......................................................................................................................................... 54<br />
3.1.10.Turkmenistan .................................................................................................................................. 55<br />
3.2. Economic factors in selected economies in Tbilisi’s region ................................................................. 56<br />
3.3. Benchmarking of Tbilisi’s economy....................................................................................................... 59<br />
4. Assessment of the business environment............................................................................................ 69<br />
4.1. Business environment............................................................................................................................ 69<br />
5. Assessment of current strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in the local economy:71<br />
5.1. Identification of key problems facing City of Tbilisi economy..............................................................74<br />
6. Appendices................................................................................................................................................... 75
CHARTS<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TABLES
CHARTS<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TABLES
Report<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
This report includes the evaluation of Tbilisi local economy and the SWOT analysis and<br />
thus illustrates the first stage of writing the Local Economic Development Plan for the City<br />
of Tbilisi.<br />
Statistical data quoted in the report have been collected by the SRGG consultants<br />
assisted by the Economic Policy Department staff of Tbilisi City Hall. The assessment of<br />
data and evaluation of economic competitiveness was done by the team of SRGG<br />
consultants working with representatives of Tbilisi City Hall and other Georgian cities and<br />
regions: Rustavi, Kutaisi, Batumi, Kvemo Khartli, Mtsheta-Mtianeti.<br />
As the project continues this information will enable us to identify key barriers standing in<br />
the way of local development and help us suggest necessary solutions.<br />
Present condition of the economy determines the perspectives of local development.<br />
Widely used „passive marketing” (i.e. expecting initiatives from outside) by no means<br />
guarantees that regional resources are utilized for the benefit of local community. It is<br />
obvious that good will, or even an initiative demonstrated by local organizations, is not<br />
enough to ensure local development. What is more, if local authorities do not use their<br />
potential, positive solutions are even less likely to happen. Thorough knowledge about the<br />
condition of local economy, which can be obtained through analyzing each of its<br />
segments, must become a vital element of the local development policy.<br />
The report consists of six parts, the reference list and annexes.<br />
The first part describes the demographic situation in relation to the age and professional<br />
structure of employed and unemployed people. The data concerning education is also<br />
discussed in the chapter. The second part presents municipal economic resources and<br />
their current output. In the third part the economic structure of Tbilisi is compared with the<br />
situation in the region. In the next fourth chapter local business environment is analyzed<br />
with the reference to capital accessibility, business procedures, taxes. The final part<br />
includes the analysis of strong and weak points as well as the opportunities and threats<br />
that Tbilisi economy has to face.
In the Soviet era Tbilisi and Georgia were a part of centrally planned socialist economy.<br />
Transportation system, cooperation networks, trade links were mainly developed within<br />
internal Soviet market. And the country’s contacts with the rest of the world, including<br />
transportation infrastructure, were led through the Soviet Union. Political reasons and<br />
missing appropriate infrastructure not only stopped Georgia from the relations with<br />
partners from outside the USSR but, due to the supremacy of central institutions, also<br />
hindered bilateral contacts between the republics.<br />
As a result of the political changes in the region transportation channels across Northern<br />
Caucasus and Russia are closed.<br />
Presently Georgia and Tbilisi are re-establishing their traditional central role on the route<br />
from Asia to Europe. Not only does it require reconstructing economic and cultural links<br />
but it is also vitally important to invest in transportation sector. Investments in the sea<br />
harbours of Baku and Poti, the airport in Tbilisi and Baku, pipelines from Azerbaijan via<br />
Tbilisi to Turkey, new road and railway connections from Tbilisi to Turkey and Baku will<br />
integrate Georgia and Tbilisi into transit services and help rebuild natural cooperation<br />
bonds.
Tbilisi in region<br />
The capital of Georgia, Tbilisi, is located at one of the routes of historical silk-road and<br />
holds the best trade-transit center position due to its strategic location at the cross-roads<br />
of Russia, North Caucasus, Turkey and Trans-Caucasus, Armenia and Azerbaijan. The<br />
city is located in the South-East part of Georgia on both banks of river Mtkvari, in Tbilisi<br />
gorge. Due to its geographical position and natural climatic conditions, Tbilisi is one of the<br />
best located cities not only in Georgia but in the whole<br />
Caucasus region.<br />
Tbilisi represents important industrial, social and cultural center of East Europe and<br />
Caucasus region and, at the dawn of the millennium, is becoming one of the most<br />
important transportation links for global energy carriers, information flows and trade<br />
projects.<br />
The construction of the Kars (Turkey)-Tbilisi-Baku (Azerbaijan) 826-kilometer railway will<br />
probably be the most significant project in the entire Caucasus and could bring<br />
tremendous economic dividends to the region and international economy. The railway line<br />
has huge potential to deepen the integration of Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan, which, in<br />
turn, will link them more closely with Europe and Asia.<br />
.
Tbilisi metro area.<br />
Tbilisi metropolitan area is spreading along the river Mtkvari, so-called “Tbilisi trench”, and<br />
is located at the spot where several historical and ethnographic regions meet. Tbilisi<br />
metro’s role in the entire system of Georgian settlement is mainly based on its location on<br />
the cross-point of the basic country settlement axis, as well as the regional and<br />
transnational one.<br />
Metro territory consists of four municipal territories (Mtskheta, Tbilisi, Rustavi, Gardabani)<br />
and the sub–regional divisions (rayons).<br />
Mtskheta (the World Heritage Site) has overtaken the functions of historical-cultural and<br />
tourist-recreation center in the process of metro forming in the area of Mtskheta-Tbilisi-<br />
Rustavi-Gardabani. It is more reasonable that Mtskheta directly boarders Tbilisi and is<br />
eccentrically allocated in regard of the region.<br />
According to this concept,<br />
Mtskheta regional recreation part<br />
(e.g. Tskhvsarichamia, Zedazeni,<br />
Tsitsamuri,<br />
Armazi,<br />
Shiomghvime) remains within the<br />
Mtskheta municipality and is<br />
accordingly considered in the<br />
Tbilisi metro entire city planning<br />
space.<br />
Rustavi basically has industrial<br />
functions.<br />
Gardabani is known for its fuelenergy<br />
profile enterprises and<br />
storing functions.<br />
The potential to play administrational, business, financial, scientific, educational and<br />
cultural relation functions typical of a powerful regional center is the main city forming<br />
factor in Tbilisi.
City of Tbilisi.<br />
By January 1, 2006, population of Tbilisi amounted to 1093 thousand, 15.2% of Tbilisi<br />
population is ethnically non-Georgians. The major non-Georgian ethnic groups are<br />
Armenians, Russians, Azeri and Sestinas.<br />
Tbilisi represents multi-functional administrational, industrial and cultural-educational<br />
center of Georgia. The city is situated along 33 kilometers of the river Mtkvari and its total<br />
area is 372 square kilometers. River Mtkvari divides the city into two . The left bank side<br />
of the city exceeds the right side districts in both territory and population.<br />
Since 2001, after the unification of the districts, Tbilisi consists of the following ones:<br />
Gldani-Nadzaladevi (87.9 square km), Didube-Chugureti (18 square km), Vake-Saburtalo<br />
(84 square km), Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi (40.4 square km), Isani-Samgori (123.9 square km)<br />
and Tskneti village (17.8 square km). Almost 30 percent of population of the Capital City<br />
lives in Gldani-Nadzaladevi district, while the highest level of population density is shown<br />
in Didube-Chugureti district where, according to the 2005 census, there are 7 855 people<br />
per square km. On average, population density in Tbilisi is 2 937 people per square km.<br />
The lowest density is in Isani-Samgori district with 2 323 people per square km. The<br />
smallest part of Tbilisi population lives in Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi district with 93 922 people.<br />
Population density in Gldani-Nadzaladevi district is 3 677, in Vake-Saburtalo district –<br />
2930, in Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi district – 2 324 people per square km.<br />
At the beginning of 2007 Tbilisi significantly expanded its territory incorporating suburban<br />
areas. As a result, more housing and commercial land appeared on the market, which is<br />
of key importance for the growth of Tbilisi metropolitan area.
The analysis of trends in the city economy will start with the analysis of population<br />
migration and education background of the residents.<br />
<br />
This indicator measures changes in demographic and sex structure in the capital of<br />
Georgia starting from the 19th century until now It helps to understand the demographic<br />
profile of the city and the ability of city institutions, local authorities and socio – economic<br />
partners to respond to changes in demography. The diversity is measured by both gender<br />
and geographical location.<br />
<br />
Year Total population men women men in % women in %<br />
1897 159.5 95.2 64.3 59.7 40.3<br />
1926 294 147.3 146.7 50.1 49.9<br />
1939 519 251.0 268.0 48.4 51.6<br />
1959 702 311.0 391.0 44.3 55.7<br />
1970 889 404.0 485.0 45.4 54.6<br />
1979 1066 486.0 580.0 45.6 54.4<br />
1989 1246.9 573.3 673.6 46.0 54.0<br />
1996 1359.7 624.1 735.6 45.8 54.2<br />
2001 1089.7 492.5 597.2 45.1 54.9<br />
2002 1081.7 488.9 592.8 45.2 54.8<br />
2003 1083.5 489.7 593.8 45.1 54.9<br />
2004 1086.4 491.1 595.3 45.2 54.8<br />
2005 1092.6 493.9 598.7 45.2 54.8<br />
Development of Georgia, City<br />
of Tbilisi.<br />
The population of Tbilisi has increased from 159.5 thousand in 1897 to 1,092,600 in 2005.<br />
The distribution of the population by sex has changed extremely during the past century<br />
from the male domination at the end of 19th century and the beginning of the 20th until<br />
reaching stable higher female participation in the total number of city’s residents between<br />
1970 - 2005.<br />
Since 2002 (when the population reached its minimum as a result of continuous decline<br />
process that had begun in the early 1990s) the number of Tbilisi residents has been rising<br />
at a regular rate.
1876 1897 1922 1926 1959 1979 1989 2002<br />
Population total in<br />
thousands 104.0 159.6 233.9 294.0 694.7 1056.1 1246.9 1081.7<br />
Georgians 22.2 42.2 80.9 112.2 336.3 656.4 824.4 910.7<br />
Armenians 37.6 47.1 85.3 100.1 149.2 152.9 150.1 82.6<br />
Russians 30.0 44.8 38.6 45.9 125.7 129.1 124.9 32.6<br />
Ossetians 0.9 1.4 2.8 15.6 27.9 33.2 10.3<br />
Ukrainians 2.7 10.9 12.6 16.1 3.3<br />
Jews 1.3 2.9 8.8 8.9 17.3 14.8 13.5 1.6<br />
Azerbaijanis 3.3 5.8 9.6 12.9 18.0 10.9<br />
Kurds 2.5 12.9 23.4 30.3 2.1<br />
Greeks 0,4 1,2 1,3 1,4 7,1 16,2 21,7 3.8<br />
Other ethnic groups 11,6 17,8 14,3 14,1 10,1 9,7 14,7 23.8<br />
<br />
The population of Tbilisi is multinational. Two major ethnic groups are the Georgians and<br />
the Armenians. The most significant decrease within the group of Russians was observed<br />
after 1989, which was caused by political transformation taking place in the country.<br />
<br />
Avarage age in 2002<br />
Total Men Women<br />
M. Tibilisi 35.8 33.6 37.6<br />
Gldani - Nadzaladevi 34.9 33.1 36.4<br />
Vake - Saburtalo 37.3 35 39.2<br />
Isani - Samgori 34.4 32.5 36.1<br />
Didube - Chugureti 37.4 34.7 39.6<br />
Mtatsminda - Krtsanisi 36.4 33.8 38.6<br />
<br />
<br />
The residents average age is calculated between 32.5 (men in Isani – Samgori) and 39.6<br />
(women in Didube-Chugureti). Distribution by sex shows that women are older than men<br />
by a couple of years. Geographically, the district Didube – Chugureti is populated by the<br />
oldest residents, both female and male.
In %<br />
Level of education 1970 1979<br />
Higher 17.8 19.3<br />
Higher, incomplete 4.5 3.9<br />
Secondary, specialization 7.2 7.9<br />
Secondary, general 28.7 27.4<br />
Secondary, incomplete 14.4 11.4<br />
Primary 17.5 1.2<br />
Not specified 9.9 28.9<br />
Total 100.0 100.0<br />
<br />
<br />
Education level 2002 ( in thousands) 2002 ( %)<br />
General primary education 18.6 2.1<br />
General elementary education 66.2 7.6<br />
Complete general secondary<br />
education 220.5 25.4<br />
Vocational education 21.4 2.5<br />
Secondary tertiary education 127.6 14.7<br />
Incomplete higher education 44.7 5.2<br />
Higher 368.9 42.5<br />
<br />
In the educational structure of Tbilisi population a significant trend can be observed of<br />
people constantly improving their education level. In particular, the number of people with<br />
secondary and university education has increased. The process started in the early<br />
1970s and has resulted in a high share of residents with this level of education in a group<br />
of 14-44-year-olds (i.e. in the productive age), which is shown in the table below.<br />
<br />
Education level<br />
Age structure<br />
2002 ( in thousands)<br />
15-44 6.7<br />
45-59/64 2.4<br />
Primary 60+/65+ 9.5<br />
15-44 69.1<br />
45-59/64 35.9<br />
Professional secondary 60+/65+ 22.7<br />
15-44 128.6<br />
45-59/64 49.6<br />
General secondary 60+/65+ 42.3<br />
15-44 202.1<br />
45-59/64 107.8<br />
University 60+/65+ 59.1
The demographic changes observed during the last several years have to be seen as<br />
related to the whole metropolitan area, as Tbilisi area population is in fact a source of<br />
workforce for its economy. The data shows the number of residents, population density<br />
division in pre-productive, productive and post productive groups in a) narrow metropolis<br />
area such as: rayon Mccheta, Tbilisi, City of Rustavi and rayon Gardabani and b) broader<br />
metropolis area including areas of Daba Kojori and Daba Didi Lilo.<br />
<br />
Population Area ( km2) Population density<br />
Tbilisi 1 081 679 244,4 4425,8<br />
Rejon Mccheta 64 829 805,0 90,1<br />
City of Rustavi 116 384 60,6 1920,5<br />
Rejon Gardabani 114 348 1304,1 87,7<br />
<br />
<br />
Metropolitan Area<br />
Preproductive Productive age Postproductive<br />
Population<br />
(year 2002)<br />
age<br />
age<br />
Rejon Gardabani 114 348 27 832 73 473 13 043<br />
City of Gardabani 11858 2 872 7 829 1 157<br />
Rejon Mccheta 64 829 13 834 41 627 9 365<br />
City of Mccheta 7718 1 583 5 043 1 092<br />
City of Rustavi 116 384 26 470 78 664 11 241<br />
<br />
The measure of population diversity by rayons and cities in metropolitan area is vital to<br />
understand the economic well-being in the areas as compared to the whole metropolis.<br />
The most populated rayon Gardabani and the city of Rustavi have also the highest<br />
number of residents in productive age (almost 73 thousands and almost 79 thousands,<br />
respectively). Rayon Mccheta is on the third position with the number of 41 627 residents<br />
in productive age.<br />
<br />
1996 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Tbilisi - total 1359.7 1089.7 1081.7 1083.5 1086.4 1092.6<br />
of which:<br />
Gldani-Nadzaladevi 398 322.8 320.4 320.9 321.6 323.3<br />
Didube-Chugureti 196.9 140.6 139.5 139.5 139.7 141.4<br />
Vake-Saburtalo 299.2 245.5 243.8 244.0 244.6 246.1<br />
Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi 113.4 94.0 93.3 93.9 93.9 93.9<br />
Isani-Samgori 352.2 286.8 284.7 285.2 286.6 287.9
The total number of Tbilisi population has decreased by almost 300 000 inhabitants<br />
between 1996 – 2005, reaching finally the figure of 1 092 600. The same decreasing<br />
trend can be observe in all districts.<br />
The highest number of residents lives in Gldani – Nadzaladevi. In all districts the total<br />
number of residents has increased by small percentage during the last 5 years, except<br />
Mtatsminda – Krtsanisi, where the number of residents has stayed on the same level for 4<br />
years.<br />
<br />
District<br />
Total in<br />
2002<br />
Productive<br />
age<br />
%<br />
Preproductive<br />
age<br />
%<br />
Post<br />
productve<br />
age<br />
Gldani -<br />
Nadzaladevi 320,361 217,980 68.0 65,337 20.4 37,035 11.6<br />
%<br />
Vake - Saburtalo<br />
243,838 162,327 66.1 44,709 18.3 36,802 15.1<br />
Isani - Samgori<br />
284,691 196,570 69.1 57,237 20.1 30,851 10.8<br />
Didube -<br />
Chugureti 139,447 91,739 65.8 25,794 18.5 21,909 15.7<br />
Mtatsminda -<br />
Krtsanisi 93,342 63,137 67.6 17,462 18.7 12,743 13.7<br />
Tibilisi 1,081,679 731,753 67.6 210,539 19.5 139,340 12.9<br />
<br />
<br />
The detailed information about the population structure within the districts shows the age<br />
diversity of the capital city.<br />
Differences are not big but it is worth noticing that the productive age group amounts to<br />
69 % of Isani Samgori community. Post productive groups exceed 15% of the population<br />
of Vake-Saburtalo and Diube-Chugureti.
Analyzing the first indicator measuring the comparative population changes by districts it<br />
is important to take into account the measures not only from the last few years, but take a<br />
longer perspective in order to observe the ongoing demographic processes. The other<br />
indicator presents the past tendencies by age and gender in the years 1922 – 1922.<br />
<br />
2000<br />
Tbilisi residents population (1897 - 2005)<br />
1980<br />
YEARS<br />
1960<br />
1940<br />
1920<br />
1900<br />
159500<br />
294000<br />
519000<br />
702000<br />
889000<br />
1246900 1089700 1083500 1092600<br />
1066000 1359700 1081700 1086400<br />
Population<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Districts<br />
Census 1989 Census 2002 Changes in population<br />
Census Census Change % Change<br />
M. Tibilisi 1,263,489 1,084,087 -179,402 -14.2<br />
Gldani –<br />
Nadzaladevi 386,501 320,956 -65,545 -17.0<br />
Vake – Saburtalo 244,202 244,525 323 0.1<br />
Isani – Samgori 331,268 2,840,022 -47,246 -14.3<br />
Didube – Chugureti 194,740 140,011 -54,729 -28.1<br />
Mtatsminda –<br />
Krtsanisi 106,778 94,573 -12,205 -11.4
Age structure of Tbilisi population 1922-2002<br />
2002<br />
1989<br />
Preproductive<br />
Productive<br />
Postproductive<br />
1979<br />
1970<br />
YEARS<br />
1959<br />
1939<br />
1930<br />
1926<br />
1922<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />
% of Population<br />
<br />
<br />
Population by age structure and gender in years 1922 – 2002<br />
In % Age groups Men Women<br />
%<br />
Pre<br />
product<br />
ive<br />
Product<br />
ive<br />
Post<br />
product<br />
ive<br />
%<br />
Pre<br />
prod<br />
Product<br />
ive<br />
Post<br />
prod<br />
Pre<br />
prod<br />
Product<br />
ive<br />
Post<br />
prod<br />
1922 28.3 65.1 6.5 29.7 64.7 5.6 27.1 65.7 7.2<br />
1926 27.2 66.7 6.1 27.5 67.5 5.0 26.9 65.8 7.3<br />
1930 26.8 66.7 6.5 - - - - - -<br />
1939 27.1 67.3 5.6 27.8 66.6 5.6 25.8 66.8 7.4<br />
1959 22.9 67.1 10.0 26.3 65.0 8.7 20.3 68.7 11.0<br />
1970 24.2 63.6 12.2 26.9 65.4 7.7 22.0 64.1 13.9<br />
1979 22.8 64.9 12.3 25.2 65.2 9.6 20.7 64.1 14.6<br />
1989 24.6 59.3 16.1 27.2 62.4 10.4 22.4 56.7 20.9<br />
2002 19.5 67.6 12.9 22.0 70.6 7.4 17.3 65.2 17.5<br />
<br />
From the total number of Tbilisi residents of 1 263 489 in 1989 the population decreased<br />
by about 14 % until 2002. For the last 4 years the index of general population growth has<br />
been only 0,2%, in 2002 this index was absolutely negative (-0,7%).
The number of women increased slightly from 1989 to 2002, while in the same period the<br />
number of men decreased nearly by 200 thousand. Such tendency is conditioned by the<br />
wave of emmigration at the beginning of the 1990s largely depriving the community of<br />
able-bodied males. This misbalance in sex, in a short- and long-term perspective, may<br />
deeply affect the social-economic development of the society.<br />
Among all the districts the most significant population decrease by about 27% was<br />
observed in Didube - Chugureti district in 1989 – 2002.<br />
Generally, the demographic changes in Tbilisi result in gradual ageing of the whole<br />
population, which in turn causes systematic fall in the number of people in productive<br />
age. At the same time, we can notice a negative balance of migration, which also<br />
indicates unfavorable economic conditions in the city. Unfortunately, current data on<br />
migration is not available.<br />
<br />
In persons<br />
1889 1979 1989 1995 2002<br />
Population 1,066 1,246,936 1,378,9 1,081.7<br />
Natural increase 7,815 8,331 7,815 2,426 2,056<br />
Birth 18,185 19,802 13,565 12,007<br />
Deaths 10,370 11,987 11,139 9,951<br />
Marriages 10,975 10,404 5,393 4,192<br />
Divorces 3,173 2,912 1,504 1,001<br />
Natural increase per 1000<br />
inhabitants 7.7 6.3 5.6 1.9<br />
<br />
<br />
Natural increase<br />
In persons 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />
Tbilisi 1701 2688 2056 2438<br />
Gldani-nazaladevi 386 541 92 5<br />
Didube-chugureti 204 186 -152 661<br />
Vake-saburtalo -182 75 -136 -71<br />
Mtacmindakrcanisi<br />
927 1467 1618 1391<br />
Isani-samgori 366 419 634 452<br />
<br />
This indicator measures the balance between births and deaths in Tbilisi from the end of<br />
XIX century until 2002.<br />
Birth rate, death rate, and natural population growth rate have been decreasing since<br />
1889, which does not contribute to population growth of Tbilisi. The number of marriages<br />
and divorces, as measured in 1979 – 2002, has also been decreasing constantly.<br />
The comparison of births index and deaths index by districts measured between 2000 –<br />
2003 shows the highest number of births in Isani – Samgori district.
The indicator measures the number of employed people in Tbilisi, a breakdown by age<br />
groups and gender. This measure will provide more detailed information for better<br />
understanding the employment and unemployment profile in the capital city, that<br />
highlights availability of human resources and shows if there is a balance of age groups<br />
and gender. The employment rates make the relationship between demographic trends<br />
and the labor market more comprehensive.<br />
<br />
Economically active (*Labour force)<br />
In thds of people Total Women<br />
2000 422.2 194.4<br />
2001 434.5 205.4<br />
2002 448.5 209.1<br />
2003 429.0 204.5<br />
2004 426.9 206.0<br />
2005 429.8 203.9<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
20-<br />
24<br />
25-<br />
29<br />
30-<br />
34<br />
35-<br />
39<br />
40-<br />
44<br />
45-<br />
49<br />
50-<br />
54<br />
55-<br />
59<br />
60-<br />
64 65+ Total<br />
In thds
Unemployment changes can be analyzed in the period of five years. The number of<br />
unemployed people has increased in all age groups.<br />
<br />
In thds<br />
people
This indicator measures the total number of employed citizens in Tbilisi in the last four<br />
years. It breaks down data by type of activity in order to describe the active labor market.<br />
This data present key employment sectors in the past and show where the new jobs<br />
emerged during four years as well as those sectors which are in urgent need of<br />
improvement.<br />
<br />
2000 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Agriculture hunting & forestry 0.7 3.0 2.6 6.8 3.1<br />
Mining 1.4 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.5<br />
Manufacturing 24.9 28.4 29.8 33.9 39.0<br />
Electricity, gas & water supply 7.6 7.9 5.9 7.6 7.9<br />
Construction 10.4 12.8 17.0 15.4 11.6<br />
Wholesale & retail trade, repair of motor<br />
vehicles & personal & household goods 44.5 78.2 73.3 71.1 64.4<br />
Hotels and restaurants 5.8 5.7 6.4 7.7 6.6<br />
Transport, storage & communication 19.5 24.6 25.8 21.2 21.9<br />
Financial intermediation 0.2 3.4 4.1 5.2 6.1<br />
Real estate renting & business activities 11.2 10.7 19.9 16.7 15.2<br />
Public administration & defense, social<br />
security 43.2 37.9 32.5 29.1<br />
Education, healthcare & social work 37.3 64.3 63.7 67.6 69.1<br />
Other community, social and personal<br />
services activities 6.7 31.3 23.3 19.9 19.7<br />
Household economy with hired employment 5.1 5.3 6.5 8.4<br />
Exterritorial organizations & bodies 0.3 1.9 2.9 2.5<br />
Non identified<br />
Total 170.2 319.5 317.0 315.6 305.1<br />
<br />
The total number of employed decreased from 319.5 thousand to 305.1 thousand in four<br />
years. Most of them fill in education, health and social jobs in 2005.<br />
The highest increase in employment can be observed in manufacturing and trade,<br />
although in 2005 the number of workers in this segment fell, which was the effect of<br />
technological and organisational changes. Also, more workers were employed in<br />
segments dealing with services such as education, health & social work as well as social<br />
and personal services.<br />
It is worth pointing out that organizational changes in public administration and<br />
technological innovations in commercial sectors will result in further redundancies in the<br />
following years.
This indicator measures the average gross monthly earnings in GEL in 2005, break down<br />
by gender and major industry type. Tracking wage levels changes within the capital city<br />
industries can indicate their competitiveness.<br />
The second indicator measures the earnings of females in comparison with males during<br />
the last year.<br />
<br />
2005<br />
In GEL/month total Women Men<br />
By business type 302.9 217.6 348.8<br />
Agriculture, hunting and forestry 169.7 167.0 170.3<br />
Industry - total 326.9 244.6 363.5<br />
Mining industry and quarry 432.5 405.1 437.5<br />
Processing industry 253.9 180.3 292.6<br />
Power, natural gas and water supply 527.5 525.6 528.1<br />
Construction 339.0 271.7 343.7<br />
Wholesale and retail sale, repair of vehicles, motorcycles,<br />
household commodities and items of personal use<br />
222.1 186.4 247.8<br />
Hotels and restaurants 143.6 115.4 181.6<br />
Transport, warehouses and communications 267.9 238.7 277.4<br />
Financial intermediation 1146.8 1131.3 1164.1<br />
Property transactions, leasing and commercial activities 228.9 161.2 278.7<br />
Public administration and defense, mandatory social<br />
insurance<br />
433.1 378.9 448.1<br />
Education 168.8 151.0 199.2<br />
Healthcare and social service 136.6 119.8 193.8<br />
Other communal, social and personal services 165.5 148.9 184.6<br />
<br />
In 2005 the highest monthly average wage of 1146,8 GEL was earned in the financial<br />
intermediation sector, while the lowest one was paid in healthcare and social service -<br />
136,6 GEL. Female average monthly salaries are always lower then male salaries in all<br />
sectors<br />
<br />
In GEL/ month 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Entrepreneurial sphere – total 89.7 128.6 132.4 154.8 184.9<br />
of which:<br />
Industry 128.9 160.5 155.3 206.5 229.5<br />
Construction 169.2 175.6 198.8 232.3 304.8<br />
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles,<br />
motorcycles and personal and household goods<br />
36.4 79.5 73.9 72.6 107.9<br />
Hotels and restaurants 78.9 150.5 190.7 242.6 233.3<br />
Transport, storage and communications 180.1 188.4 194.8 221.9 279.0<br />
Real estate, renting and business activities 106.2 123.6 127.0 156.0 184.7<br />
Education 61.8 88.0 85.5 113.2 112.2
The monthly average wage during the last five years has increased in all branches.<br />
Industries offering the highest salaries include mainly: financial intermediation, power,<br />
natural gas and water supply, public administration and defense, mandatory social<br />
insurance and constructions.<br />
<br />
<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Average monthly salary in (GEL) 80 129 154.8 174.4 218.7 302.9<br />
by gender:<br />
Men 192.0 200.3 251.6 348.8<br />
Women 106.0 133.4 166.7 212.6<br />
<br />
The average monthly salary of women improved during the 4 years. The average monthly<br />
salaries was almost doubled, but the gender pay gap still exists. In traditional economy<br />
sectors the gap was about 20%, while in the service sector the disproportion was not so<br />
big.
The basic measure of the quality of life is the cost of living in the city and the information<br />
how many individuals and families can cover these costs. In recent years living cost have<br />
increased by about one third.<br />
<br />
(GEL/month) a soul two<br />
souls<br />
three<br />
souls<br />
four<br />
souls<br />
five<br />
souls<br />
six and more<br />
souls<br />
2000 104.9 167.8 188.8 209.7 235.9 327.2<br />
2001 104.6 167.4 188.4 209.3 235.5 326.5<br />
2002 113.4 181.4 204.1 226.7 255.1 353.7<br />
2003 118.5 189.6 213.3 237.0 266.6 369.6<br />
2004 124.4 199.0 223.8 248.7 279.8 388.0<br />
2005 137.6 219.8 247.2 274.7 309 428.5<br />
<br />
The Government of Georgia established the amounts of social assistance for the families<br />
below the poverty margin which depend on the number of members of registered socially<br />
vulnerable families at the moment of allocation of the welfare benefit.<br />
The amounts are as follows: for single-member families – 38 GEL; for two-member<br />
families – 55 GEL; for three-member families – 70 GEL; for four-member families – 85<br />
GEL; for five-member families – 100 GEL; for six-member families – 115 GEL; for sevenmember<br />
families – 125 GEL. For the families with eight and more members 10 GEL<br />
assistance is added for the eighth and each additional member.<br />
As the above mentioned data indicates, on 30 May 2006 in Tbilisi there were 95 749<br />
people living in 33 349 families who considered themselves being in extreme poverty<br />
according to their socio-economic status and who expressed the wish to receive social<br />
assistance. Both by number of families and number of population, the majority of the<br />
registered families live in Gldani-Nadzaladevi (32.0%) and Isani-Samgori districts<br />
(23.0%), while the minority of registered families inhabit Vake-Saburtalo district (12.4%).<br />
The statistics indicate that the living conditions of the registered population are extremely<br />
hard. Considering the cash-based add-ins of all types, 37.2% of total financial income of<br />
registered population are old age pensions, 27.1% - salaries and 20.1% - income from<br />
individual business activity.
According to the declared data, total income of the last one month of the registered<br />
socially vulnerable population amounted to 3,082,604 GEL that is 32.1 GEL per person<br />
for the registered category of population, and this indicator represents only 32.5% of<br />
minimum living costs according to the Department of Statistics as of January 1, 2006<br />
(19.6% under old indicators).<br />
<br />
(mln. lari)<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Total income 176,3 214,3 244,7 261,7 291,2<br />
Cash income and transfers – total 161,0 198,2 230,5 252,3 277,6<br />
Contractual employment 91,3 109,6 126,4 127,2 142,3<br />
Self-employment 36,0 38,5 46,9 43,4 51,6<br />
Sales of agricultural products 0,5 0,2 0,3 0,6 1,9<br />
Income from asset holdings (lease of property<br />
and interest income)<br />
3,3 4,5 2,5 4,1 5,6<br />
Pension, stipends, family allowances, benefits 12,4 15,9 16,8 13,4 17,7<br />
Remittances from abroad 3,3 11,9 14,2 29,0 21,8<br />
Remittances from relatives 14,3 17,6 23,4 34,8 36,7<br />
In-kind income<br />
15,3 16,1 14,2 9,4 13,5<br />
Other cash total 34,4 21,4 68,3 48,2 50,9<br />
Sale of assets 10,9 9,2 25,9 7,6 21,3<br />
Debt or use of savings 23,5 12,1 42,4 40,7 29,6<br />
Cash – total 195,3 219,6 298,8 300,6 328,5<br />
Cash and non-cash means – total 210,7 235,7 313,0 310,0 342,1<br />
<br />
<br />
(mln. lari) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Total consumption expenditure 322.1 344.1 380.1 349.6 385.3<br />
Total cash expenditure on consumption 306.8 328.0 365.9 340.2 371.7<br />
Food item, alcohol, tobacco 158.7 170.7 180.8 172.3 189.2<br />
Clothing and footwear 15.1 16.7 16.6 16.0 18.3<br />
Household items 41.0 38.1 10.3 10.6 13.2<br />
Health care 14.9 18.1 25.7 21.1 20.3<br />
Fuel and electricity 19.0 24.3 32.5 30.4 32.4<br />
Transportation 28.1 27.5 50.2 38.5 39.7<br />
Education and recreation 13.7 15.3 28.7 11.8 13.1<br />
Other cash expenditure on consumption 16.3 17.2 21.1 39.5 45.6<br />
Consumption in kind 15.3 16.1 14.2 9.4 13.5<br />
Other expenditure – total 29.2 26.0 64.1 41.0 45.5<br />
Agriculture 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4<br />
Social transfers 1.5 2.4 5.9 7.1 8.6<br />
Savings or loans 27.5 23.4 22.5 20.2 21.4<br />
Investment 0.0 0.0 35.4 13.3 15.0<br />
Total cash expenditure 336.0 353.9 430.0 381.1 417.2<br />
Total expenditure 351.3 370.0 444.2 390.5 430.8
There have been two different periods of domestic economy in the last years. In the<br />
nineties and at the beginning of current decade undeclared activity was often the only<br />
chance for a family to survive.<br />
Information on non-observed economy in those years is presented on the basis of<br />
surveys conducted by the State Department for Statistics of Georgia National Accounts<br />
and the Macroeconomic Analysis Division.<br />
In the Georgian economy, especially in the entrepreneurial sector, the share of the nonobserved<br />
economy is quite high – one third in the total output and more than 55 percent<br />
in the entrepreneurial sector, according to estimates for 2000-2001.<br />
The share of the non-observed economy in the entrepreneurial sector varies a little<br />
across the years but remains very high:<br />
<br />
Total output of<br />
the economy<br />
Total output of<br />
the<br />
entrepreneurial<br />
sector<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Non-observed<br />
26.9 27.4 28.3 29.2 33.2 33.7<br />
According to regular statistical<br />
surveys 73.1 72.6 71.7 70.8 66.8 66.3<br />
Total<br />
100 100 100 100 100 100<br />
Non-observed<br />
56.8 54.7 54.3 54.2 56.1 57.8<br />
According to regular statistical<br />
surveys 43.2 45.3 45.7 45.8 43.9 42.2<br />
Total<br />
100 100 100 100 100 100<br />
<br />
The analysis of the non-observed economy shows that among non-statistical reasons of<br />
its existence the low level of accounting in small enterprises and the informal sector are<br />
the most important. In the informal sector it is often quite impossible to separate<br />
entrepreneurial income and expenses from other income and consumption expenditures<br />
of a household. For small enterprises this is combined with income understating that<br />
takes place for tax avoiding purposes, or just in case, to keep off possible complications<br />
when declaring income.<br />
In the informal sector a part of the production is often aimed for non-market selfconsumption.<br />
Therefore, to determine the real production extent in this sphere is one of<br />
the most difficult problems of measuring the non-observed economy.<br />
Due to large share of the informal sector in the national economy, this problem is<br />
especially important in Georgia. According to the estimates, in 2001 the share of the<br />
informal economy in the total output was as large as 35% and 57,8 for the entrepreneurial<br />
sector.
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />
Share of the non-observed output in the total output of the<br />
section, percent<br />
Industry 46 43 40 39 41 41<br />
Agriculture, forestry, fishing 9 9 9 9 11 9<br />
Construction 18 35 33 33 45 52<br />
Transport 38 35 36 37 36 37<br />
Communications 23 23 19 24 21 25<br />
Trade 66 60 57 56 56 57<br />
Hotels and Restaurants 62 61 60 64 69 75<br />
Other 24 27 31 33 41 38<br />
Total economy 26.9 27.4 28.3 29.2 33.2 33.7<br />
<br />
Industries where the largest share of non-observed output to hotels and restaurants,<br />
construction, trade and industry was assessed during the survey.<br />
As in many post–communist economies, non recorded operations and the informal<br />
economy still remain among the major impediments to the economy. However,<br />
successful anti-corruption policies, together with increased institutional efficiency, have<br />
resulted in a clear tendency towards the legalization of the informal economy.<br />
<br />
In % 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />
Non recorded 32.6 32.9 33.6 31.6<br />
<br />
Although the most recent data was not available it should be pointed out that the tax<br />
collection has dramatically improved.<br />
Government reforms after “Rose Revolution” changed the situation by the introduction of<br />
new simplified business and tax regulations. As a result many existing non-observed<br />
companies registered their activities and started to pay taxes.
The demographic changes are primarily reflected in the Tbilisi educational system. It is<br />
important that there are enough schools and high standard school facilities. When private<br />
schools and institutions appear as competition for public schools, also the quality of<br />
education, curricula and certification processes have to be monitored.<br />
<br />
The indicator measures the number and types of schools by ownership, educational<br />
network and number of students in 1990/1991 – 2004/2005 school years to display the<br />
different educational opportunities and options.<br />
<br />
students Number of institutions Number of students, thsd.<br />
<br />
<br />
)<br />
Pre-school<br />
institutions<br />
Public general<br />
education<br />
schools<br />
Non-public<br />
general<br />
education<br />
schools<br />
Public<br />
professional<br />
secondary<br />
schools<br />
Private<br />
professional<br />
secondary<br />
schools<br />
Public higher<br />
educational<br />
institutions<br />
Private higher<br />
educational<br />
institutions<br />
1990/<br />
1991<br />
2000/<br />
2001<br />
2001/<br />
2002<br />
2002/<br />
2003<br />
2003/<br />
2004<br />
2004/<br />
2005<br />
1990/<br />
1991<br />
2000/<br />
2001<br />
2001/<br />
2002<br />
2002/<br />
2003<br />
2003/<br />
2004<br />
281 184 187 186 188 48,3 23.4 24.6 23.8 24.0<br />
2004/<br />
2005<br />
211 208 209 209 209 211 185,5 159.4 159.2 157.2 153.9 148.7<br />
55 61 66 74 85 6.5 7.1 8.6 9.0 12.9<br />
26 23 23 23 23 23 19,9 11.3 10.2 8.7 8.1 8.5<br />
17 15 17 18 21 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.3 2.1<br />
15 15 15 15 14 58.2 64.9 68.4 70.6 78.3<br />
87 90 90 87 104 20.4 17.2 18.1 16.8 21.3<br />
<br />
<br />
Tbilisi has several types of schools to choose from. In due course the number of public<br />
educational institutions in school years between 1990/1991 and 2004/2005 is stable and<br />
the number of non–public and private schools and institutions measured since 2000/2001<br />
has increased.<br />
The following trends can be observed regarding the number of pupils and students in<br />
Tbilisi. As a result of demographic changes the registered number of pupils in pre–school,<br />
public general education, public professional secondary schools and institutions has fallen<br />
down in comparison with 1990/1991, but in public higher educational institutions and in<br />
non–public or private schools the number of students has been constantly increasing<br />
since 2000/2001.
The detailed information was recorded for the public general education schools in the<br />
capital city, where the same number of 211 schools has existed since 1990/1991 school<br />
year. Although the day school number has increased during last 15 years (while evening<br />
schools decreased), at the same time the number of students in day schools has<br />
decreased by 40 000.<br />
<br />
<br />
Public general education<br />
schools<br />
Private general education<br />
schools<br />
<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
11,412 11,00 11,999 12,167 11,923<br />
1,800 2,153 2,27 2,700 2,072<br />
The public general educational schools and private general educational schools will<br />
reduce the number of employed teachers when the number of pupils continues to<br />
decrease.<br />
<br />
<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Total Women Total Women Total Women Total Women Total Women Total Women<br />
Total<br />
number of<br />
students 82.1 41.0 86.4 43.1 87.4 43.9 99.6 49.6 86.8 45.2<br />
In public<br />
universities 58.2 27.4 64.9 30.6 68.4 33.0 70.6 34.7 78.3 37.4 66.9 33.6<br />
In private<br />
universities<br />
17.6 - 17.3 10.5 18.1 10.1 16.8 9.1 21.3 12.2 19.9 11.6<br />
Graduated - - 12.7 6.8 14.7 8.1 13.8 7.2 15.0 8.0 15.9 8.6<br />
In public<br />
universities 9.3 5.1 9.4 4.7 11.3 6.0 10.7 5.3 11.4 5.9 11.9 6.4<br />
In private<br />
universities - - 3.3 2.1 3.4 2.1 3.1 11.8 3.7 2.1 4.0 2.2
In thds of students Public universities Private universities<br />
2000/2001 2001/2002 2005/2006 2005/2006<br />
Total 58.2 64.9 66.9 19.9<br />
Industry and<br />
construction 18.8 25.0 22.8 0.3<br />
Agriculture 3.5 3.4 2.9 1.5<br />
Economics 2.3 2.5 3.2 1.5<br />
Health care 4.3 4.4 4.1 1.1<br />
Physical culture<br />
and sports 1.9 2.2 2.9 2.6<br />
Education 24.3 24.1 26.0 10.6<br />
Art. and culture 2.8 2.9 4.3 0.8<br />
Others 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.5<br />
<br />
Each year more and more university students are recruited in Tbilisi. The trend can be<br />
observed both at state and private higher education organisations, which results from the<br />
fact that schools are competing for students.<br />
The most popular faculties are engineering, industry and construction and pedagogical<br />
studies.
2006 Tbilisi<br />
Saburtalo-<br />
Vake<br />
Isani-<br />
Samgori<br />
Didube-<br />
Chuhureti<br />
Gldani -<br />
Nadzaladevi<br />
Mtacminda-<br />
Krcanisi<br />
Registered vacant workplaces - 175<br />
Workers 98 80 18<br />
Specialists 28 25 3<br />
Technical staff 49 39 10<br />
Registered vacant workplaces by economic activity<br />
Agricultural<br />
industry,hunting,forestry<br />
Fish industry<br />
Heavy and mining industry<br />
Manufacturing industry 3 3<br />
Electricity,natural gas and<br />
water economy 2 2<br />
Constructions 75 57 18<br />
Wholesale and retail trade,<br />
consumer, motor-car and<br />
motorcycle services 7 7<br />
Hotels and restaurants 12 12<br />
Transportation<br />
management, warehouses<br />
and communication<br />
Financial activity 2 2<br />
Real estate finance,and<br />
commercial activity 19 10 9<br />
Executive personnel, selfdefense<br />
and mandatory<br />
insurance<br />
Education 9 9<br />
Public health and social<br />
services 40 36 4<br />
Other social and personal<br />
services 6 6<br />
Housing and communal<br />
services<br />
Registered job seekers - 8763<br />
Workers 2480 675 867 228 710 2766<br />
Specialists 4782 1991 926 1010 855 1035<br />
Technical staff 1501 602 268 311 320 424<br />
Primary education 2<br />
General education 20 7 7 7 5 90<br />
Full secondary education 2514 654 863 863 725 2690<br />
Primary training education 14 10 1 7<br />
Secondary training<br />
education 1630 616 425 425 343 478<br />
High/ university education 4584 1965 766 766 747 950
2005 Tbilisi<br />
Saburtalo-<br />
Vake<br />
Isani-<br />
Samgori<br />
Didube-<br />
Chuhureti<br />
Gldani -<br />
Nadzaladevi<br />
Mtacminda-<br />
Krcanisi<br />
Registered vacant workplaces - 391<br />
Workers 179 38 27 77 30 22<br />
Specialists 43 14 25 2<br />
Technical staff 169 59 27 45 11<br />
Registered vacant workplaces by economic activity<br />
Agricultural<br />
industry,hunting,forestry<br />
Fish industry<br />
Heavy and mining<br />
industry<br />
Manufacturing industry 19 9 3 7<br />
Electricity,natural gas<br />
and water economy<br />
Constructions 6 2 4<br />
Wholesale and retail<br />
trade,consumer,<br />
motorcar and<br />
motorcycle services 79 21 2 44 9 3<br />
Hotels and restaurants 11 1 7 3<br />
Transportation<br />
management,<br />
warehouses and<br />
communication 33 3 11 19<br />
Financial activity<br />
Real estate finance, and<br />
commercial activity 40 1 2 37<br />
Executive personnel,<br />
self-defense and<br />
mandatory insurance 13 4 9 9<br />
Education 1 1<br />
Public health and social<br />
services 10 1 9<br />
Other social and<br />
personal services 173 85 25 36 4 27<br />
Housing and communal<br />
services 6 21 2 6 9 3<br />
Exterritorial<br />
organisations<br />
Registered job seekers - 11953<br />
Workers 4986 658 791 194 577 2766<br />
Specialists 5150 1760 752 879 724 1035<br />
Technical staff 1817 600 268 266 259 424<br />
Primary education 2 2<br />
General education 106 7 3 1 5 90<br />
Full secondary<br />
education 4929 622 791 229 597 2690<br />
Primary training<br />
education 21 10 4 7<br />
Secondary training edu 1948 588 372 228 282 478<br />
High/ university<br />
education 4898 1776 645 867 660 950
2004 Tbilisi<br />
Saburtalo-<br />
Vake<br />
Isani-<br />
Samgori<br />
Didube-<br />
Chuhureti<br />
Gldani -<br />
Nadzaladevi<br />
Mtacmind<br />
a-Krcanisi<br />
Registered vacant workplaces - 405<br />
Workers 182 70 32 25 55<br />
Specialists 121 6 32 83<br />
Technical staff 102 10 67 2 23<br />
Registered vacant workplaces by economic activity<br />
Agricultural<br />
industry,hunting,forestry<br />
Fish industry<br />
Heavy and mining<br />
industry<br />
Manufacturing industry<br />
Electricity, natural gas<br />
and water economy<br />
Constructions<br />
Wholesale and retail<br />
trade, consumer, motorcar<br />
and motorcycle<br />
services 103 79 21 3<br />
Hotels and restaurants 10 6 4<br />
Transportation<br />
management,<br />
warehouses and<br />
communication<br />
Financial activity 20 20<br />
Real estate finance, and<br />
commercial activity<br />
Executive personnel,<br />
self-defense and<br />
mandatory insurance 1 1<br />
Education 1 1<br />
Public health and social<br />
services 32 1 31<br />
Other social and<br />
personal services 238 32 66 85 55<br />
Housing and communal<br />
services<br />
Exterritorial<br />
organisations<br />
Registered job seekers - 21841<br />
Workers 7782 695 1765 106 2706 2510<br />
Specialists 9237 3170 1211 1092 2050 1714<br />
Technical staff 4822 534 1148 432 2186 522<br />
Primary education 9 7 2<br />
General education 107 4 7 96<br />
Full secondary<br />
education 8010 671 1799 346 2815 2379<br />
Primary training<br />
education 114 10 76 19 2 7<br />
Secondary training<br />
education 4909 829 888 383 2028 781<br />
High/ university<br />
education 8538 2878 1354 798 2049 1459
More careful observation of the trends on the local labor market is also carried out in the<br />
districts of Tbilisi. Its results show that every year there are less registered vacancies and,<br />
at the same time, there are fewer job seekers. It results from the fact that people find jobs<br />
outside the labor market institutions operating in Tbilisi. The districts where workers are<br />
most looked for are Saburtalo-Vake oraz Didube-Chuhureti, while the district where the<br />
number of job seekers is the highest (several times more than in other parts of the city) is<br />
Isani-Samgori. It is worth mentioning that it is the district with the largest share of people<br />
in productive age.<br />
Key conclusions for the demography part:<br />
1. Positive demographic trends – since the middle of 1990s the number of residents<br />
has been systematically growing and over 65% of each district’s population are<br />
people in productive age.<br />
2. The metropolitan area of the City of Tbilisi (cities of Gardabani, Mccheta, Rustavi<br />
and rayons of Gardabani and Mccheta) is surrounded by towns with high potential<br />
of population in productive age. The educational structure of Tbilisi is dominated by<br />
people in their productive age educated on the secondary and higher level.<br />
3. The ethnic structure of the city is getting less diversified with the growing share of<br />
people of Georgian origin.<br />
4. The number of the employed decreases while there are more and more<br />
unemployed people.<br />
5. The level of women’s salaries is lower than the salary level in individual sectors. A<br />
significant rise in pay has been observed in few sectors (constructions, hotels<br />
restaurants, trade).<br />
6. The share of non-registered („grey zone”) businesses in the city’s economy<br />
exceeds 33%.<br />
7. The number of schools falls, which is the effect of the decreasing number of<br />
children in primary schools. It signals the change in current demographic trends in<br />
the city and the decrease in local population in the future.<br />
8. There are too many teachers employed in the system of education.<br />
9. The number of state and private university students is growing, especially at the<br />
faculties teaching engineering and construction, which partly results from the<br />
recent growth of manufacturing and construction industries in Tbilisi.<br />
10. Official statistics concerning staff turnover show that there are more people<br />
seeking jobs than the labor market can provide. The sectors where demand is the<br />
highest include commerce and constructions.<br />
11. Number of the unemployed officially registered in job centers is much lower than<br />
the total actual number of the unemployed, which mainly was as a result of<br />
insufficient interest of the unemployed citizens in receiving official unemployed<br />
status. It also shows that job centers do not play an important role on the labour<br />
market and do not offer desired services to the workforce and entrepreneurs. In<br />
the future they should take much more initiative in serving individuals that are<br />
looking for job or new qualifications as well as entrepreneurs looking for qualified<br />
workers. It is important to remember that job centers are key players in the<br />
development of workforce programs.
1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Entities – total 8411 30701 35327 41316 47632 56571<br />
of which:<br />
Agriculture, hunting and forestry 202 216 219 229 239<br />
Fishing 9 9 11 11 12<br />
Mining and quarrying 66 72 73 75 80<br />
Manufacturing 1169* 3716 3875 4060 4356 4704<br />
Electricity, gas and water supply 78 90 91 95 98<br />
Constructions 582 1299 1383 1435 1517 1639<br />
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles,<br />
motorcycles and personal and household goods 4788 15193 18554 23384 28033 35042<br />
Hotels and restaurants 938 980 1042 1124 1239<br />
Transport, storage and communication 256 2119 2230 2294 2370 2521<br />
Financial intermediation 440 465 475 515 545<br />
Real estate, renting and business activities 2340 2535 2674 2860 3130<br />
Public administration and defense; compulsory social<br />
security 295 320 332 346 377<br />
Education 477 529 559 599 625<br />
Health and social work 778 818 859 893 942<br />
Other community, social and personal service activities 1616 2740 3239 3796 4597 5365<br />
Private households with employed persons 6 6 6 6 6<br />
Extra-territorial organizations and bodies 5 6 6 6 7<br />
<br />
<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Tbilisi - total 30701 35327 41316 47632 56571<br />
of which:<br />
Gldani-Nadzaladevi 5105 5890 6919 7675 8296<br />
Didube-Chugureti 7839 8937 10342 11819 14578<br />
Vake-Saburtalo 8841 10298 12398 14405 16358<br />
Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi 4435 5376 5925 6635 8116<br />
Isani-Samgori 4481 4826 5732 7098 9223<br />
<br />
Since the late 1990s the number of companies in Tbilisi, mainly the private ones, has<br />
dynamically grown. As the above tables show the highest dynamics can be observed in<br />
such sectors as industry, manufacturing, commerce and services. This tendency results<br />
from the introduction of market economy and the trend is present in the whole country. In<br />
2000 – 2004 in almost all the city districts the number of companies doubled.
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Entities – total 30701 35327 41316 47632 56571 71351<br />
Entities of private law - total 30145 34726 40657 46938 55838 70603<br />
Commercial legal persons 14302 15827 17492 19476 22338 25585<br />
Joint liability companies 198 203 209 213 225 240<br />
Limited partnerships 5 6 8 10 14 21<br />
Limited liability companies 13601 15068 16689 18609 21371 24506<br />
Joint stock companies 461 512 548 604 686 774<br />
Cooperatives 37 38 38 40 42 44<br />
Non-commercial legal persons 1761 2327 2829 3425 3870 3962<br />
Unions (associations) 1249 1648 2049 2617 3052 3129<br />
Funds 512 679 780 808 818 833<br />
Individual enterprises 12635 15011 18708 22313 27816 39194<br />
Branches, representatives, etc. 1447 1561 1628 1724 1814 1862<br />
Entities of public law – total 556 601 659 694 733 748<br />
<br />
The increasing number of businesses is observed in all legal forms of entrepreneurship. The<br />
number of firms listed on the stock exchange has been growing. They are typically the most<br />
dynamically expanding companies with high future potential.<br />
<br />
<br />
In ths people 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Employment 725,0 761,9 743,8 737,4 708,7 681,7 723,8 722,4<br />
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 33,6 34,7 34,8 17,2 17,8 17,8 36,7 33,8<br />
Mining and quarrying 7,5 5,4 5,3 3,6 2,9 5,2 4,4 4,0<br />
Manufacturing 84,7 95,3 96,7 89,5 78,9 66,7 80,1 77,1<br />
Electricity, gas, water supply 17,8 22,4 20,6 28,8 29,1 28,4 22,5 24,3<br />
Constructions 12,4 20,3 20,9 25,4 19,8 21,8 32,2 30,2<br />
Trade and Utilities 63,4 61,5 74,6 72,5 65,4 68,0 77,7 75,9<br />
Hotels and Restaurants 8,5 13,2 13,2 14,8 20,6 17,0 13,6 14,5<br />
Transport and storage, communications 52,5 59,5 55,6 59,2 63,8 58,6 58,3 55,1<br />
Financial Intermediation 10,0 12,4 10,5 13,5 8,6 8,4 11,1 13,5<br />
Research and planning 36,6 34,6 36,2 24,0 18,6 19,6 24,9 28,1<br />
Public administration, defense 102,9 112,4 105,8 105,7 108,2 108,7 104,6 102,9<br />
Education 151,2 144,4 136,2 141,2 146,4 140,8 142,1 148,5<br />
Health care and social services 91,9 85,4 77,2 89,0 81,2 69,5 60,3 58,0<br />
Other community, social and personal 36,5 43,3 39,3 39,7 38,7 44,0 47,3 47,1<br />
service activities<br />
Private households with employed 14,1 15,0 15,0 7,1 7,1 6,1 4,9 4,9<br />
persons<br />
Ex- territorial organizations 1,6 2,0 1,8 1,6 1,6 1,3 3,1 4,6
In thds people<br />
Employment, of which<br />
Budgetary<br />
organizations<br />
State<br />
owned<br />
enterprises<br />
Enterprise or<br />
organization<br />
without<br />
foreign<br />
participation<br />
Joint<br />
venture or<br />
international<br />
organization<br />
Self employed, of<br />
which<br />
Other Employers Self<br />
employed<br />
outside<br />
agriculture<br />
2002 Total 109.5 33.0 161.9 10.9 3.6 11.4 64.7<br />
Women 68.2 13.5 64.5 4.8 2.0 1.7 24.8<br />
2003 Total 113.5 35.4 153.4 11.1 0.4 7.0 59.7<br />
Women 68.8 14.1 56.7 4.2 0.1 1.8 23.4<br />
2004 Total 98.7 39.4 162.1 13.2 2.1 9.5 62.8<br />
Women 62.2 20.0 65.4 3.2 0.5 1.7 21.1<br />
2005 Total 103.0 34.7 154.6 12.0 0.7 10.3 53.2<br />
Women 61.6 16.0 62.5 3.2 0.3 2.2 18.8<br />
<br />
The transformation of local economy is also illustrated by the employment structure in companies.<br />
The largest share in the job market belongs to enterprises or organizations without foreign<br />
participation. Government organisations still employ half of all employees, but for the last three<br />
years their labour market share has been systematically shrinking.<br />
<br />
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Average monthly<br />
wages (in GEL):<br />
Total in the country 52,1 67,1 76,8 83,6 90,6 103,6 107,2 118,3<br />
economy<br />
In the state sector 43,9 55,3 62,1 63,9 70,4 75,2 78,8 91,4<br />
In the private sector 56,6 73,0 83,9 93,5 102,0 120,0 122,0 132,8<br />
Average monthly<br />
wages (in GEL):<br />
In industry 63,8 80,6 86,7 94,0 115,1 138,4 127,3 142,1<br />
In agriculture 36,7 41,5 51,6 89,0 82,7 81,1 82,7 76,4<br />
In service sector 50,4 65,0 75,2 80,8 86,0 96,8 103,9 114,0<br />
In banking financial<br />
sector<br />
87,1 102,2 131,4 100,6 107,6 177,1 158,6 216,7<br />
Employment (in<br />
thousands of people)<br />
Total in the country 725,0 761,9 743,8 1064,5 708,7 681,7 723,8 722,4<br />
economy<br />
In industry 110,0 123,2 122,6 121,9 110,9 100,3 107,0 105,3<br />
In agriculture 33,6 34,7 34,8 17,2 17,8 17,8 36,7 33,8<br />
In service sector 571,4 591,6 575,8 911,9 571,4 555,2 568,9 569,8<br />
In banking financial<br />
sector<br />
10,0 12,4 10,5 13,5 8,6 8,4 11,1 13,5
Years<br />
Of which by:<br />
Total<br />
investments budgetary non-budgetary individual builders<br />
foreign<br />
investments<br />
Mln. lari (at actual prices)<br />
2000 230.9 26.1 63.9 50.0 90.9<br />
2001 294.2 12.3 96.5 23.8 161.6<br />
2002 314.5 12.0 185.8 61.4 55.3<br />
2003 253.7 20.2 119.3 49.8 64.4<br />
2004 859.9 37.8 145.6 24.8 651.7<br />
In % to the previous year<br />
2000 186.2 78.1 287.8 103.3 454.5<br />
2001 127.4 47.1 151.0 47.6 177.8<br />
2002 106.9 97.6 192.5 258.0 34.2<br />
2003 80.7 168.3 64.2 81.1 116.5<br />
2004 338.9 187.1 122.0 49.8 1011.9<br />
<br />
The city owes the significant 2003-2004 investment growth mainly to foreign investments. The<br />
level of inside investments has not changed considerably since the early 2000 and stays at 150<br />
mln GEL.
Units 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Entities – total 4626 5989 6316 8939<br />
Of which: 0 0 0 0<br />
Agriculture, hunting and forestry 14 3 10 10<br />
Fishing 0 2 0 1<br />
Mining and quarrying 6 1 2 5<br />
Manufacturing 159 185 296 348<br />
Electricity, gas and water supply 12 1 4 3<br />
Constructions 84 52 82 122<br />
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles,<br />
motorcycles and personal and household goods 3361 4830 4649 7009<br />
Hotels and restaurants 42 62 82 115<br />
Transport, storage and communication 111 64 76 151<br />
Financial intermediation 25 10 40 30<br />
Real estate, renting and business activities 195 139 186 270<br />
Public administration and defense; compulsory social<br />
security 25 12 14 31<br />
Education 52 30 40 26<br />
Health and social work 40 41 34 49<br />
Other community, social and personal service activities 499 557 801 768<br />
Private households with employed persons 0 0 0 0<br />
Extra-territorial organizations and bodies 1 0 0 1<br />
<br />
From the city’s economic policy point of view the dynamics and industrial structure of new<br />
businesses are extremely important.<br />
In each of the analysed years the number of businesses set up in Tbilisi grew. The only industry<br />
where this dynamics has been slowing down is electricity, gas and water supply, but this area is<br />
strongly controlled by the state and free market principles are non-existent there. Another such<br />
area includes agriculture, hunting and forestry, i.e. industries that are not technologically<br />
advanced and therefore not attractive. The third sector of poor dynamics is education. In this case<br />
the reason for slower growth of businesses is heavy saturation of the market with traditional<br />
educational services (schools, universities). The number of businesses in other areas is<br />
increasing. Thus it seems necessary to carry out further research in order to answer the question<br />
how long newly established companies can survive and how they will develop in the future.
Georgian exports are partially concentrated on low value-added commodities such as<br />
ferrous metals, copper, aluminum, iron steel and mineral fuels ( see table 7.1 – chapter 7<br />
appendices). However, the dynamics of export seems to indicate that the concentration of<br />
exports on low value-added commodities will decrease gradually over time.<br />
<br />
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Exports (million USD) 152 199 240 192 238 330 320 348 444 298<br />
Imports (million USD) 395 687 942 880 602 651 684 731 1,058 765<br />
Trade balance (million -243 -488 -702 -688 -364 -321 -364 -383 -614 - 467<br />
USD)<br />
<br />
Imports are dominated by mineral products (mainly including natural gas, oil and oil<br />
products), and electricity, which indicates the dependence of Georgia on foreign energy.<br />
In 2003 imports increased by 45% in USD, reflecting the need for imported goods for the<br />
construction of the Baku- Tbilisi- Ceikhan (BTC) pipeline.<br />
In 2004 exports increased by 66% compared with the same period of 2003, while imports<br />
increased by 57%. Such significant growth in trade turnover is a result of anti- corruption<br />
measures implemented by the Georgian Government, which brought about a stricter<br />
control of import and export flows. The share of the ten main trade partners in the total<br />
registered trade turnover was about 73,4%. The main partners in the last 10 years were<br />
Russia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and the UK.<br />
<br />
USD ths Percent<br />
Total imports 1057793 100<br />
Petroleum oils and oils from bituminous minerals 102543 9,7<br />
Tubes and pipes 93,723 8,9<br />
Petroleum gases 65,99 6,2<br />
Medicines 51,56 4,9<br />
Sugar 50,58 4,8<br />
Motor cars and other motor vehicles 44,51 4,2<br />
Electric energy 21,51 2,0<br />
Tobacco and manufactured tobacco substitutes 19,80 1,9<br />
Steam turbines and other vapour turbines and thereof 17,72 1,7<br />
Aircraft powered, spacecraft ( including satellites) and spacecraft<br />
launch vehicles 16,94 1,6<br />
Other 572,89 54,2<br />
<br />
In 2003 imports were dominated by mineral products. The figures in Table 3 demonstrate<br />
Georgia’s continuing dependence on foreign energy. The import of petroleum, gas, oil,<br />
and electrical energy together represented about 18% of total recorded imports. The<br />
import of articles of iron and steel (mainly pipes for the BTC construction) was the second<br />
largest item, with a value of USD 93,7 million. Imports of pharmaceutical products<br />
accounted for 5% of recorded imports. The share of imported food (wheat, flour) and<br />
tobacco was slowly decreasing. Table ( Composition of registered imports) indicates that<br />
the largest imported product groups together constituted about 46% of total imports in<br />
2003.
( in percent of total 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Export 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />
Russia 29,1 20,8 20,8 23,3 17,7 18,2 16,2 17,8<br />
Turkey 11,3 15,4 22,6 22,0 15,5 17,9 18,3 14,1<br />
Azerbaijan 7,5 4,3 6,2 3,1 8,5 3,6 3,9 9,6<br />
Armenia 9,7 6,6 4,2 3,9 5,8 6,7 8,4 4,6<br />
Germany 6,7 11,0 10,6 2,4 1,6 2,1 2,5 3,3<br />
Unites States 5,9 4,4 2,2 2,8 3,9 3,3 3,3 3,1<br />
Italy 5,0 4,7 3,7 2,7 2,2 1,9 1,8 3,9<br />
Ukraine 3,9 4,6 3,4 3,6 3,7 6,5 2,4 4,4<br />
France 3,3 0,3 0,3 0,1 0,9 1,1 1,5 1,3<br />
Switzerland 2,9 2,5 4,1 4,9 7,0 7,2 2,7 0,4<br />
Netherlands 1,8 1,0 0,6 1,1 1,3 2,1 1,5 1,3<br />
Bulgaria 1,7 0,2 0,7 0,2 0,0 0,0 2,4 4,9<br />
Others 11,1 24,2 20,4 29,9 32,0 29,4 35,1 31,4<br />
<br />
The main market for Georgian products is still the CIS. Turkey is a destination for 16% of<br />
Georgian exports. The EU’s share is about same. During the past few years the CIS and<br />
the EU have accounted for more than 70% of Georgia’s registered imports. Turkey has<br />
accounted for another 10%. Imports from the USA were relatively small.<br />
Several factors and parameters related to the prospective economic development of the<br />
country provide sufficient grounds for dynamic expansion of export and import flows in<br />
Georgia.<br />
However, Georgia needs to diversify its export markets, which seems eminently possible<br />
through full utilisation of its multilateral and bilateral trade arrangements as well as<br />
through the production of internationally competitive products.<br />
<br />
In 2005, the foreign trade turnover was USD 3,357.6 million, which is 34.6% more than in<br />
2004. Export was USD 866.7 million (increased with 34.0%) and import USD 2,490.9<br />
million (increased with 34.8%). The negative trade balance increased with 35.2% to USD<br />
-1,624.2 million.<br />
In 2005 Georgia had a negative trade balance with 101 partner states (104 in 2004), with<br />
a combined trade deficit of USD 1,687.5 million (USD 1,321.4 in 2004). A positive trade<br />
balance was recorded with 31 states (21 in 2004), with a total surplus of USD 63.3 million<br />
(in 2004 USD 120.5 million).<br />
In 2005 the share of foreign trade with CIS countries increased. The foreign trade<br />
turnover with CIS countries reached USD 1,406.1 million (42.8% higher than in 2004) and<br />
was 41.9% of total trade turnover. The foreign trade turnover with EU countries was USD<br />
836.7 million, which is 14.8% higher than last year’s. The trade turnover with EU countries<br />
was 24.9% of the total trade turnover.<br />
Russia is the most important trade partner of Georgia. In 2005, the trade turnover with<br />
Russia increased with 48.6% and reached USD 538.3 million, which is 16.0% of the total<br />
foreign trade turnover. The next important partners are Turkey (12.1% of foreign trade),<br />
Azerbaijan (9.4%) and Ukraine (7.7%).<br />
No significant changes occurred last year in the export-import commodity structure.<br />
In export, the most important commodities were black scrap metals (with a share in total<br />
export of 9.7%), natural wine (9.4%), ferroalloys (9.3%), nuts (8.1%) and aircrafts (8.0%).<br />
In import, the most important commodities were oil and oil products (13.5%), followed by<br />
automobiles (7.2%).
Railroad Motovehicles Marine Air Total<br />
1997 7,2 12,2 300<br />
1998 8,4 15 625<br />
1999 9,4 16 419<br />
2000 11,5 18,5 63 13 30,0<br />
2001 13,2 20,0 31 12 33,2<br />
2002 14,9 22,5 36 13 37,4<br />
2003 16,6 24,5 21 13 41,0<br />
2004 15,4 25,7 29 16 41,1<br />
2005 18,9 26,9 24 16 45,8<br />
<br />
Georgian railway<br />
The Georgian railway is one of the crucial links in Eurasian transit and serves as a shortcut<br />
linking Europe and Central Asia. The Georgian railway system directly links the<br />
railway systems of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia. Railway- ferry lines from Batumi and<br />
Poti Black Sea ports directly connect the Caucasus and Central Asia with the Black Sea<br />
regions.<br />
To maintain the volume of freight flow on the Georgian railway and attract additional<br />
freight, volume-based and preferential tariffs are applied. For example, the volume-based<br />
tariff on transit of crude oil is 5 USD per ton and on transit of oil products it is 7 USD per<br />
ton.<br />
To ensure effective use of the Georgian transit corridor and attract additional freight, the<br />
Government of Georgia actively cooperates with neighboring countries. A Poti - Baku-<br />
Aktau - Almaty container train to which preferential tariffs will apply, will begin operation in<br />
2006. Via this train export traffic to the territory of Kazakhstan is 0,22 USD per<br />
container/km, and import traffic is 0,28 USD per container/km. Transit traffic through the<br />
territories of Georgia and Azerbaijan is 0,28 USD per container/km.<br />
<br />
years Volume of cargo ( in millions of tons) Number of passengers in millions<br />
1995 4.6 1.7<br />
1996 4.8 1.9<br />
1997 7.2 1.9<br />
1998 8.5 2.3<br />
1999 9.5 1.9<br />
2000 11.5 2.3<br />
2001 13.1 2.1<br />
2002 14.9 2.1<br />
2003 16.4 2.2<br />
2004 15.5 3.0<br />
2005 8.3 1.4
local transit import export<br />
1995 1.2 2.0 0.3 0.9<br />
1996 1.4 2.1 0.7 0.5<br />
1997 1.6 3.1 1.5 0.8<br />
1998 1.2 5.5 1.3 0.4<br />
1999 1.4 6.8 0.6 0.5<br />
2000 1.7 8.4 0.6 0.6<br />
2001 1.8 10.1 0.7 0.4<br />
2002 2.0 11.6 0.8 0.5<br />
2003 2.4 12.1 1.1 0.8<br />
2004 2.0 10.7 1.6 0.9<br />
2005 (6-months) 0.8 6.1 0.9 0.4<br />
<br />
<br />
Years<br />
Road transportation volume of cargo<br />
(in millions of tons)<br />
Rail cargo volume of cargo<br />
( in millions of tons)<br />
1998 15.0 8.5<br />
1999 16.0 9.5<br />
2000 18.5 11.5<br />
2001 20.0 13.1<br />
2002 22.5 14.9<br />
2003 24 16.6<br />
2004 15.4<br />
2006 (months) 8.3<br />
<br />
Civil Aviation<br />
<br />
Number of passengers Number of connections Volume of cargo ( in tons)<br />
International domestic International domestic International domestic<br />
1995 4236 43 3794 1699<br />
2000 27001 6004 6044 1526 7530<br />
2003 314867 3419 7014 1130 4907<br />
2004 39501 7386 8542 1476 5848<br />
2005 536418 10742 9650 1612 6274<br />
<br />
At present 4 national and 13 foreign regular airlines, including Austrian airlines, British<br />
Airlines, Lufthansa and Turkish airlines are operating in Georgia. Direct air connections<br />
are available from Tbilisi to Vienna, Zurich, Athens, Paris, Prague, Berlin, Munich,<br />
Frankfurt, Istanbul, Moscow, St. Petersburg. In 2005, Georgia processed 260,000 air<br />
passengers and 1.6 thousand tons of air cargo. 98% of air transportation is performed by<br />
Tbilisi International Airport.<br />
In 1994 Georgia became a member of International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO),<br />
and in 2005 a member of the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC).
Key conclusions on the economic performance:<br />
1. Since the late 1990s the number of companies in Tbilisi, mainly the private ones, has<br />
dynamically grown. The highest dynamics can be observed in such sectors as<br />
industry, manufacturing, commerce and services.<br />
2. The number of firms listed on the stock exchange has been growing. They are<br />
typically the most dynamically expanding companies with high future potential.<br />
3. The city owes the significant 2003-2004 investment growth mainly to foreign<br />
investments.<br />
4. In Tbilisi number of newly opened businesses has been growing each year.<br />
5. Imports are dominated by raw materials (mainly natural gas, oil and oil products), and<br />
electricity, which indicates the dependence of Georgia on foreign energy. In 2003<br />
imports increased by 45% in USD as a result of the demand for imported goods<br />
needed for the construction of Baku- Tbilisi- Ceikhan (BTC) pipeline.<br />
6. What seems to have a particularly negative impact is the deficit in foreign exchange<br />
that results from larger imports than exports and reflexes the inefficiency of local<br />
economy in satisfying the local market. The export structure is dominated by raw<br />
materials and unprocessed goods, which neither generates jobs nor stimulates<br />
income growth in the City as well as in the country as it would happen if the<br />
processing sector was more advanced.<br />
7. The impact of market economy transformations has been most apparent in the city<br />
economy which is mainly demonstrated by staff flow from public to private sector, the<br />
increased number of businesses and growing popularity of self-employment.<br />
8. Tbilisi job market covers almost 50% of jobs in the whole country and staff turnover is<br />
stimulated by the systematically growing level of salaries which are now higher in the<br />
private sector.<br />
9. The number of people employed in industry has been falling, while services generate<br />
more jobs every year.<br />
10. The situation of local economy is also reflected in the transport sector where export<br />
has a rather small share while transit transport (both road and railway transport, which<br />
results from the country’s specific geographical position) is getting more and more<br />
significant.<br />
11. The growth of air transport is generated mainly by international flights. National flights<br />
have remained at the same level since 2000. Such situation results from the fact that<br />
the airport has joined several international aviation organisations and associations,<br />
which forced them to restructure and adjust service levels to standards required by<br />
their international partners’.
After the collapse of Soviet Union Tbilisi is back on the way to its natural role in the<br />
region as city on transportation paths between Europe and Asia. As it is was also in the<br />
history Tbilisi is competing with Baku and Yerevan to be Caucasian key urban center for<br />
international relations and services. In spite of development of cooperation and new<br />
transportation connections with Turkey can be observed there are now big cities that can<br />
compete with Tbilisi in the eastern part of Turkey. Tbilisi doesn’t have competitors in the<br />
North because of relations with Russia and situation in Northern Caucasus. Situation in<br />
Central Asia is more important for role of Tbilisi in the wider region. Dynamic changes in<br />
the Central Asiatic countries create a new position of their cites. New economic situation<br />
create a Kazakhstan and both its cities Astana and Almaty as regional leaders and key<br />
regional urban centers. In result looking for Tbilisi regional role, Georgian capitol will<br />
compete with mainly with Baku and Yerevan and Astana with Almaty.<br />
Because of lack of current comparative data on cities, first report present some data on<br />
neighboring countries and assessment of Tbilisi role is presented in report two when city<br />
competitive factors are discussed.
Population: 142,893,540<br />
Age structure:<br />
0-14 years: 14.2% (male 10,441,151/female 9,921,102)<br />
15-64 years: 71.3% (male 49,271,698/female 52,679,463)<br />
65 years and over: 14.4% (male 6,500,814/female 14,079,312) (2006 est.)<br />
GDP<br />
GDP - purchasing power parity - 1.559 trillion USD<br />
GDP - official exchange rate - 763,7 billion USD<br />
GDP - per capita (PPP) - 10,640 USD<br />
public debt - 12,9 % of GDP<br />
population below poverty line - 17,80%<br />
Budget – gov. (2005)<br />
Revenues: 176,7 billion USD<br />
Expenditures: 125,6 billion USD<br />
Inflation rate 12.7%<br />
Unemployment rate 7.6% plus considerable<br />
underemployment (2005 est.)<br />
Administrative divisions: 48 oblasts (oblastey, singular - oblast), 21 republics (respublik,<br />
singular - respublika), 9 autonomous okrugs (avtonomnykh okrugov, singular -<br />
avtonomnyy okrug), 7 krays (krayev, singular - kray), 2 federal cities (singular - gorod),<br />
and 1 autonomous oblast (avtonomnaya oblast'), note: administrative divisions have the<br />
same names as their administrative centers (the exceptions have the administrative<br />
center name following in parentheses)<br />
Russia ended 2005 with its seventh straight year of growth, averaging 6.4% annually<br />
since the financial crisis of 1998. Although high oil prices and a relatively cheap ruble are<br />
important drivers of this economic rebound, since 2000 investment and consumer-driven<br />
demand have played a noticeably increasing role. Real fixed capital investments have<br />
averaged gains greater than 10% over the last five years, and real personal incomes<br />
have realized average increases over 12%. During this time, poverty has declined<br />
steadily and the middle class has continued to expand. Russia has also improved its<br />
international financial position since the 1998 financial crisis, with its foreign debt declining<br />
from 90% of GDP to around 31%. Strong oil export earnings have allowed Russia to<br />
increase its foreign reserves from only $12 billion to some $180 billion at yearend 2005.<br />
These achievements, along with a renewed government effort to advance structural<br />
reforms, have raised business and investor confidence in Russia's economic prospects.<br />
Nevertheless, serious problems persist. Economic growth slowed to 5.9% for 2005 while<br />
inflation remains high. Oil, natural gas, metals, and timber account for more than 80% of<br />
exports, leaving the country vulnerable to swings in world prices. Russia's manufacturing<br />
base is dilapidated and must be replaced or modernized if the country is to achieve<br />
broad-based economic growth. Other problems include a weak banking system, a poor<br />
business climate that discourages both domestic and foreign investors, corruption, and<br />
widespread lack of trust in institutions. In addition, a string of investigations launched
against a major Russian oil company, culminating with the arrest of its CEO in the fall of<br />
2003 and the acquisition of the company by a state owned firm, have raised concerns by<br />
some observers that President PUTIN is granting more influence to forces within his<br />
government that desire to reassert state control over the economy. State control has<br />
increased in the past year with a number of large acquisitions. Most fundamentally,<br />
Russia has made little progress in building the rule of law, the bedrock of a modern<br />
market economy.<br />
<br />
Population: 15,233,244 (July 2006 est.)<br />
Age structure:<br />
0-14 years: 23% (male 1,792,685/female 1,717,294)<br />
15-64 years: 68.8% (male 5,122,027/female 5,357,819)<br />
65 years and over: 8.2% (male 438,541/female 804,878) (2006 est.)<br />
GDP<br />
GDP - purchasing power parity - 128.9 billion USD<br />
GDP - official exchange rate - 56.08 billion USD<br />
GDP - per capita (PPP) - 7,730 USD<br />
public debt - 10.5% of GDP<br />
population below poverty line - 19 %<br />
Budget – gov. (2005)<br />
Revenues: 12.19 billion USD<br />
Expenditures: 12.44 billion billion USD<br />
Inflation rate 7,6 %<br />
Unemployment rate 8.1% (2005)<br />
Administrative divisions: 14 provinces (oblystar, singular - oblys) and 3 cities* (qala,<br />
singular - qalasy); Almaty Oblysy, Almaty Qalasy*, Aqmola Oblysy (Astana), Aqtobe<br />
Oblysy, Astana Qalasy*, Atyrau Oblysy, Batys Qazaqstan Oblysy (Oral), Bayqongyr<br />
Qalasy*, Mangghystau Oblysy (Aqtau), Ongtustik Qazaqstan Oblysy (Shymkent),<br />
Pavlodar Oblysy, Qaraghandy Oblysy, Qostanay Oblysy, Qyzylorda Oblysy, Shyghys<br />
Qazaqstan Oblysy (Oskemen), Soltustik Qazaqstan Oblysy (Petropavlovsk), Zhambyl<br />
Oblysy (Taraz), note: administrative divisions have the same names as their<br />
administrative centers (the exceptions have the administrative center name following in<br />
parentheses); in 1995, the Governments of Kazakhstan and Russia entered into an<br />
agreement whereby Russia would lease for a period of 20 years an area of 6,000 sq km<br />
enclosing the Baykonur space launch facilities and the city of Bayqongyr (Baykonur,<br />
formerly Leninsk); in 2004 a new agreement extended the lease to 2050.
Population: 46,710,816 (July 2006 est.)<br />
Age structure:<br />
0-14 years: 14.1% (male 3,377,868/female 3,203,738)<br />
15-64 years: 69.3% (male 15,559,998/female 16,831,486)<br />
65 years and over: 16.6% (male 2,635,651/female 5,102,075) (2006 est.)<br />
GDP<br />
GDP - purchasing power parity - 320.5 billion USD<br />
GDP - official exchange rate - 81.66 billion USD<br />
GDP - per capita (PPP) - 6,720 USD<br />
public debt - 17 % of GDP<br />
population below poverty line - 29 %<br />
Budget – gov. (2005)<br />
Revenues: 23,59 billion USD<br />
Expenditures: 22.98 billion USD; note - this is the consolidated budget<br />
Inflation rate 13.5 %<br />
Unemployment rate 3,1 %<br />
Administrative divisions: 24 provinces (oblasti, singular - oblast'), 1 autonomous republic*<br />
(avtonomna respublika), and 2 municipalities (mista, singular - misto) with oblast status**;<br />
Cherkasy, Chernihiv, Chernivtsi, Crimea or Avtonomna Respublika Krym* (Simferopol'),<br />
Dnipropetrovs'k, Donets'k, Ivano-Frankivs'k, Kharkiv, Kherson, Khmel'nyts'kyy,<br />
Kirovohrad, Kiev (Kyyiv)**, Kyyiv, Luhans'k, L'viv, Mykolayiv, Odesa, Poltava, Rivne,<br />
Sevastopol', Sumy, Ternopil', Vinnytsya, Volyn' (Luts'k), Zakarpattya (Uzhhorod),<br />
Zaporizhzhya, Zhytomyr note: administrative divisions have the same names as their<br />
administrative centers (the exceptions have the administrative center name following in<br />
parentheses).
Population: 4,661,473 (July 2006 est.)<br />
Age structure:<br />
0-14 years: 17.3% (male 428,056/female 380,193)<br />
15-64 years: 66.2% (male 1,482,908/female 1,602,064)<br />
65 years and over: 16.5% (male 308,905/female 459,347) (2006 est.)<br />
GDP<br />
GDP - purchasing power parity - 14.21 billion USD<br />
GDP - official exchange rate - 6.39 billion USD<br />
GDP - per capita (PPP) - 3,270 USD<br />
public debt - 17 % of GDP<br />
population below poverty line - 54 %<br />
Budget – gov. (2005)<br />
Revenues: 1.43 billion USD<br />
Expenditures: 1.56 billion billion USD<br />
Inflation rate 8,2 %<br />
Unemployment rate 12,6% (2005)<br />
9 regions (mkharebi, singular - mkhare), 9 cities (k'alak'ebi, singular - k'alak'i), and 2<br />
autonomous republics (avtomnoy respubliki, singular - avtom respublika) regions: Guria,<br />
Imereti, Kakheti, Kvemo Kartli, Mtskheta-Mtianeti, Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti,<br />
Samegrelo and Zemo Svaneti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Shida Kartli cities: Chiat'ura, Gori,<br />
K'ut'aisi, P'ot'i, Rust'avi, T'bilisi, Tqibuli, Tsqaltubo, Zugdidi autonomous republics:<br />
Abkhazia or Ap'khazet'is Avtonomiuri Respublika (Sokhumi), Ajaria or Acharis<br />
Avtonomiuri Respublika (Batumi).<br />
Georgia's main economic activities include the cultivation of agricultural products such as<br />
grapes, citrus fruits, and hazelnuts; mining of manganese and copper; and output of a<br />
small industrial sector producing alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages, metals,<br />
machinery, and chemicals. The country imports the bulk of its energy needs, including<br />
natural gas and oil products. It has sizeable but underdeveloped hydropower capacity.<br />
Despite the severe damage the economy has suffered due to civil strife, Georgia, with the<br />
help of the IMF and World Bank, has made substantial economic gains since 2000,<br />
achieving positive GDP growth and curtailing inflation. Georgia had suffered from a<br />
chronic failure to collect tax revenues; however, the new government is making progress<br />
and has reformed the tax code, improved tax administration, increased tax enforcement,<br />
and cracked down on corruption. In addition, the reinvigorated privatization process has<br />
met with success, supplementing government expenditures on infrastructure, defense,<br />
and poverty reduction. Despite customs and financial (tax) enforcement improvements,<br />
smuggling is a drain on the economy. Georgia also suffers from energy shortages due to<br />
aging and badly maintained infrastructure, as well as poor management. Due to<br />
concerted reform efforts, collection rates have improved considerably to roughly 60%,<br />
both in T'bilisi and throughout the regions. Continued reform in the management of stateowned<br />
power entities is essential to successful privatization and onward sustainability in<br />
this sector. The country is pinning its hopes for long-term growth on its role as a transit
state for pipelines and trade. The construction on the Baku-T'bilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline and<br />
the Baku-T'bilisi-Erzerum gas pipeline have brought much-needed investment and job<br />
opportunities. Nevertheless, high energy prices in 2006 will compound the pressure on<br />
the country's inefficient energy sector. Restructuring the sector and finding energy supply<br />
alternatives to Russia remain major challenges.<br />
<br />
Population: 2,976,372 (July 2006 est.)<br />
Age structure:<br />
0-14 years: 20.5% (male 322,189/female 286,944)<br />
15-64 years: 68.4% (male 949,975/female 1,085,484)<br />
65 years and over: 11.1% (male 133,411/female 198,369) (2006 est.)<br />
GDP<br />
GDP - purchasing power parity - 15.12 billion USD<br />
GDP - official exchange rate - 4.903 billion USD<br />
GDP - per capita (PPP) - 5,060 USD<br />
population below poverty line - 43 %<br />
Budget – gov. (2005)<br />
Revenues: 786,1 million USD<br />
Expenditures: 930,7 million USD<br />
Inflation rate 0,6 %<br />
Unemployment rate 31,6% (2005)<br />
Administrative divisions: 11 provinces (marzer, singular - marz); Aragatsotn, Ararat,<br />
Armavir, Geghark'unik', Kotayk', Lorri, Shirak, Syunik', Tavush, Vayots' Dzor, Yerevan<br />
Under the old Soviet central planning system, Armenia had developed a modern<br />
industrial sector, supplying machine tools, textiles, and other manufactured goods to<br />
sister republics in exchange for raw materials and energy. Since the implosion of the<br />
USSR in December 1991, Armenia has switched to small-scale agriculture away from the<br />
large agroindustrial complexes of the Soviet era. The agricultural sector has long-term<br />
needs for more investment and updated technology. The privatization of industry has<br />
been at a slower pace, but has been given renewed emphasis by the current<br />
administration. Armenia is a food importer, and its mineral deposits (copper, gold, bauxite)<br />
are small. The ongoing conflict with Azerbaijan over the ethnic Armenian-dominated<br />
region of Nagorno-Karabakh and the breakup of the centrally directed economic system<br />
of the former Soviet Union contributed to a severe economic decline in the early 1990s.<br />
By 1994, however, the Armenian Government had launched an ambitious IMF-sponsored<br />
economic liberalization program that resulted in positive growth rates in 1995-2005.<br />
Armenia joined the WTO in January 2003. Armenia also has managed to slash inflation,<br />
stabilize its currency, and privatize most small- and medium-sized enterprises. Armenia's<br />
unemployment rate, however, remains high, despite strong economic growth. The chronic<br />
energy shortages Armenia suffered in the early and mid-1990s have been offset by the<br />
energy supplied by one of its nuclear power plants at Metsamor. Armenia is now a net<br />
energy exporter, although it does not have sufficient generating capacity to replace<br />
Metsamor, which is under international pressure to close. The electricity distribution
system was privatized in 2002. Armenia's severe trade imbalance has been offset<br />
somewhat by international aid, remittances from Armenians working abroad, and foreign<br />
direct investment. Economic ties with Russia remain close, especially in the energy<br />
sector. The government made some improvements in tax and customs administration in<br />
2005, but anti-corruption measures will be more difficult to implement. Investment in the<br />
construction and industrial sectors is expected to continue in 2006 and will help to ensure<br />
annual average real GDP growth of about 13.9%.<br />
<br />
Population: 7,961,619 (July 2006 est.)<br />
Age structure:<br />
0-14 years: 25.8% (male 1,046,501/female 1,011,492)<br />
15-64 years: 66.3% (male 2,573,134/female 2,706,275)<br />
65 years and over: 7.8% (male 246,556/female 377,661) (2006 est.)<br />
GDP<br />
GDP - purchasing power parity - 47.03 billion USD<br />
GDP - official exchange rate - 12.56 billion USD<br />
GDP - per capita (PPP) - 4,890 USD<br />
population below poverty line - 49 %<br />
Budget – gov. (2005)<br />
Revenues: 3.18 billion USD<br />
Expenditures: 2.986 billion USD<br />
Inflation rate 0,6 %<br />
Unemployment rate 1.1% official rate (2005)<br />
Azerbaijan's number one export is oil. Azerbaijan's oil production declined through 1997,<br />
but has registered an increase every year since. Negotiation of production-sharing<br />
arrangements (PSAs) with foreign firms, which have thus far committed $60 billion to<br />
long-term oilfield development, should generate the funds needed to spur future industrial<br />
development. Oil production under the first of these PSAs, with the Azerbaijan<br />
International Operating Company, began in November 1997. A consortium of Western oil<br />
companies is scheduled to begin pumping 1 million barrels a day from a large offshore<br />
field in early 2006, through a $4 billion pipeline it built from Baku to Turkey's<br />
Mediterranean port of Ceyhan. Economists estimate that by 2010 revenues from this<br />
project will double the country's current GDP. Azerbaijan shares all the formidable<br />
problems of the former Soviet republics in making the transition from a command to a<br />
market economy, but its considerable energy resources brighten its long-term prospects.<br />
Baku has only recently begun making progress on economic reform, and old economic<br />
ties and structures are slowly being replaced. Several other obstacles impede<br />
Azerbaijan's economic progress: the need for stepped up foreign investment in the nonenergy<br />
sector, the continuing conflict with Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh region,<br />
and the pervasive corruption. Trade with Russia and the other former Soviet republics is<br />
declining in importance while trade is building with Turkey and the nations of Europe.<br />
Long-term prospects will depend on world oil prices, the location of new pipelines in the<br />
region, and Azerbaijan's ability to manage its oil wealth.
Population: 5,213,898 (July 2006 est.)<br />
Age structure:<br />
Age structure: 0-14 years: 30.9% (male 821,976/female 789,687)<br />
15-64 years: 62.9% (male 1,607,396/female 1,669,612)<br />
65 years and over: 6.2% (male 126,847/female 198,380) (2006 est.)<br />
GDP<br />
GDP - purchasing power parity - 9.97 billion USD<br />
GDP - official exchange rate - 2.441 billion USD<br />
GDP - per capita (PPP) - 1,870 USD<br />
population below poverty line - 40 %<br />
Budget – gov. (2005)<br />
Revenues: 516.3 million USD<br />
Expenditures: 539.9 million USD<br />
Inflation rate 5,2 %<br />
Unemployment rate 18% official rate (2005)<br />
7 provinces (oblastlar, singular - oblasty) and 1 city* (shaar); Batken Oblasty, Bishkek<br />
Shaary*, Chuy Oblasty (Bishkek), Jalal-Abad Oblasty, Naryn Oblasty, Osh Oblasty, Talas<br />
Oblasty, Ysyk-Kol Oblasty (Karakol) note: administrative divisions have the same names<br />
as their administrative centers (exceptions have the administrative center name following<br />
in parentheses)<br />
Kyrgyzstan is a poor, mountainous country with a predominantly agricultural economy.<br />
Cotton, tobacco, wool, and meat are the main agricultural products, although only tobacco<br />
and cotton are exported in any quantity. Industrial exports include gold, mercury, uranium,<br />
natural gas, and electricity. Kyrgyzstan has been progressive in carrying out market<br />
reforms, such as an improved regulatory system and land reform. Kyrgyzstan was the<br />
first CIS country to be accepted into the World Trade Organization. Much of the<br />
government's stock in enterprises has been sold. Drops in production had been severe<br />
after the breakup of the Soviet Union in December 1991, but by mid-1995, production<br />
began to recover and exports began to increase. Kyrgyzstan has distinguished itself by<br />
adopting relatively liberal economic policies. The drop in output at the Kumtor gold mine<br />
sparked a 0.5% decline in GDP in 2002, but GDP growth bounced back in 2003-05. The<br />
government has made steady strides in controlling its substantial fiscal deficit and<br />
reduced the deficit to 1% of GDP in 2005. The government and international financial<br />
institutions have been engaged in a comprehensive medium-term poverty reduction and<br />
economic growth strategy, and in 2005 agreed to pursue much-needed tax reform.<br />
Progress fighting corruption, further restructuring of domestic industry, and success in<br />
attracting foreign investment are keys to future growth. Countrywide, official<br />
unemployment is 3%, but the actual rate is closer to 40% . Women account for 62% of<br />
those unemployed. Roughly 65% of Kyrgyz live in rural areas, and the majority of rural<br />
residents are farmers. The lack of adequately paid work in rural areas is prompting an<br />
out-migration to major cities like Bishkek, Osh and Jalal-Abad.
Population: 27,307,134 (July 2006 est.)<br />
Age structure:<br />
0-14 years: 32.9% (male 4,572,721/female 4,403,405)<br />
15-64 years: 62.3% (male 8,420,174/female 8,594,478)<br />
65 years and over: 4.8% (male 539,336/female 777,020) (2006 est.)<br />
GDP<br />
GDP - purchasing power parity - 53.87 billion USD<br />
GDP - official exchange rate - 13,66 billion USD<br />
GDP - per capita (PPP) - 2,020 USD<br />
population below poverty line - 28 %<br />
Budget – gov. (2005)<br />
Revenues: 2,815 billion USD<br />
Expenditures: 2,917 million USD<br />
Inflation rate 6,9 %<br />
Unemployment rate 0,7% (2005)<br />
Administrative divisions:<br />
12 provinces (viloyatlar, singular - viloyat), 1 autonomous republic (respublika), and 1 city<br />
(shahar); Andijon Viloyati, Buxoro Viloyati, Farg'ona Viloyati, Jizzax Viloyati, Namangan<br />
Viloyati, Navoiy Viloyati, Qashqadaryo Viloyati (Qarshi), Qoraqalpog'iston Respublikasi*<br />
(Nukus), Samarqand Viloyati, Sirdaryo Viloyati (Guliston), Surxondaryo Viloyati (Termiz),<br />
Toshkent Shahri**, Toshkent Viloyati, Xorazm Viloyati (Urganch)
Population: 7,320,815 (July 2006 est.)<br />
Age structure:<br />
0-14 years: 37.9% (male 1,396,349/female 1,375,168)<br />
15-64 years: 57.4% (male 2,091,476/female 2,108,889)<br />
65 years and over: 4.8% (male 154,162/female 194,771) (2006 est.)<br />
GDP<br />
GDP - purchasing power parity - 8.53 billion USD<br />
GDP - official exchange rate - 2.326 billion USD<br />
GDP - per capita (PPP) - 1,260 USD<br />
population below poverty line - 64 %<br />
Budget – gov. (2005)<br />
Revenues: 442.3 million USD<br />
Expenditures: 542.6 million USD<br />
Inflation rate 7,1 %<br />
Unemployment rate 12% (2005)<br />
Provinces (viloyatho, singular - viloyat) and 1 autonomous province* (viloyati mukhtor);<br />
Viloyati Khatlon (Qurghonteppa), Viloyati Mukhtori Kuhistoni Badakhshon* [Gorno-<br />
Badakhshan] (Khorugh), Viloyati Sughd (Khujand) note: the administrative center name<br />
follows in parentheses.<br />
Macroeconomic overviews<br />
Tajikistan has one of the lowest per capita GDPs among the 15 former Soviet republics.<br />
Only 6% of the land area is arable; cotton is the most important crop. Mineral resources,<br />
varied but limited in amount, include silver, gold, uranium, and tungsten. Industry consists<br />
only of a large aluminum plant, hydropower facilities, and small obsolete factories mostly<br />
in light industry and food processing. The civil war (1992-97) severely damaged the<br />
already weak economic infrastructure and caused a sharp decline in industrial and<br />
agricultural production. Even though 64% of its people continue to live in abject poverty,<br />
Tajikistan has experienced steady economic growth since 1997, but experienced a slight<br />
drop in its growth rate to 8% in 2005 from 10.6% in 2004. Continued privatization of<br />
medium and large state-owned enterprises would further increase productivity.<br />
Tajikistan's economic situation, however, remains fragile due to uneven implementation of<br />
structural reforms, weak governance, widespread unemployment, and the external debt<br />
burden. A debt restructuring agreement was reached with Russia in December 2002,<br />
including a $250 million write-off of Tajikistan's $300 million debt to Russia. Tajikistan<br />
ranks third in the world in terms of water resources per head. A proposed investment to<br />
finish the hydropower dams Rogun and Sangtuda would substantially add to electricity<br />
production. If finished, Rogun will be the world's tallest dam.
Population: 5,042,920 (July 2006 est.)<br />
Age structure:<br />
0-14 years: 35.2% (male 913,988/female 863,503)<br />
15-64 years: 60.7% (male 1,501,486/female 1,557,155)<br />
65 years and over: 4.1% (male 79,227/female 127,561) (2006 est.)<br />
GDP<br />
GDP - purchasing power parity - 39.54 billion USD<br />
GDP - official exchange rate - 6.77 billion USD<br />
GDP - per capita (PPP) - 8000 USD<br />
population below poverty line - 58 %<br />
Budget – gov. (2005)<br />
Revenues: 1.401 billion USD<br />
Expenditures: 1.542 billion USD<br />
Inflation rate 10,5 %<br />
Unemployment rate 60% (2005)<br />
5 provinces (welayatlar, singular - welayat): Ahal Welayaty (Ashgabat), Balkan Welayaty<br />
(Balkanabat), Dashoguz Welayaty, Lebap Welayaty (Turkmenabat), Mary Welayaty note:<br />
administrative divisions have the same names as their administrative centers (exceptions<br />
have the administrative center name following in parentheses)<br />
Turkmenistan is a largely desert country with intensive agriculture in irrigated oases and<br />
large gas and oil resources. One-half of its irrigated land is planted in cotton; formerly it<br />
was the world's tenth-largest producer. Poor harvests in recent years have led to an<br />
almost 50% decline in cotton exports. With an authoritarian ex-Communist regime in<br />
power and a tribally based social structure, Turkmenistan has taken a cautious approach<br />
to economic reform, hoping to use gas and cotton sales to sustain its inefficient economy.<br />
Privatization goals remain limited. In 1998-2005, Turkmenistan suffered from the<br />
continued lack of adequate export routes for natural gas and from obligations on<br />
extensive short-term external debt. At the same time, however, total exports rose by 20%<br />
to 30% per year in 2003-2005, largely because of higher international oil and gas prices.<br />
In 2005, Ashgabat sought to raise natural gas export prices to its main customers, Russia<br />
and Ukraine, from $44 per thousand cubic meters (tcm) to $66 per tcm. Overall prospects<br />
in the near future are discouraging because of widespread internal poverty, the burden of<br />
foreign debt, the government's irrational use of oil and gas revenues, and its unwillingness<br />
to adopt market-oriented reforms. Turkmenistan's economic statistics are state secrets,<br />
and GDP and other figures are subject to wide margins of error. In particular, the rate of<br />
GDP growth is uncertain.
140<br />
130<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Georgia 102,6 111,2 110,5 103,1 102,9 101,8 104,8 105,5 111,1 105,9 109,3 108,6<br />
Azerbaijan 88,2 101,3 105,8 110 107,4 111,1 109,9 110,6 111,2 110,2 126,4 134,5<br />
Armenia 106,9 105,9 103,3 107,3 103,3 105,9 109,6 113,2 114 110,5 114 113,4<br />
Kazahstan 91,8 100,5 101,7 98,1 102,7 109,8 113,5 109,8 109,3 109,6 109,5 110,6<br />
Ukraine 102,6 111,2 110,5 103,1 102,9 101,8 104,8 105,5 111,1 105,9 109,3 108,6<br />
<br />
<br />
140<br />
130<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Georgia 86 107 108 98 107 111 95 107 115 109 116<br />
Azerbaijan 79 93 100,3 102 104 107 105 104 106 106 134 136,6<br />
Armenia 102 101 101 98 105 106 105 115 115 102 108 99,1<br />
Kazahstan 92 100,3 104 98 103 116 114 111 109 110 105 107<br />
Ukraine 88 95 99,7 99 104 112 114 107 116 113 103 106,2
180<br />
170<br />
160<br />
150<br />
140<br />
130<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Georgia 151 106 152 180 49 97 111 118 191<br />
Azerbaijan 82 212 139 123 98 103 121 184 174 135 117 114,8<br />
Armenia 96 113 100 117 98 127 106 145 141 115 133 137,1<br />
Kazahstan 57 60 112 142 133 149 145 111 117 123 134 110,6<br />
Ukraine 72 78 91 106 100,4 114 121 109 131 128 102 116,1<br />
<br />
<br />
180<br />
170<br />
160<br />
150<br />
140<br />
130<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Georgia 103 94 139 122 107 116 111 113 110 100,2 112 111,3<br />
Azerbaijan 91 100,7 117 120 133 121 117 109 112 107 111 107,2<br />
Armenia 99,7 92 94 87 91 90 114 169 92 93 123 119,1<br />
Kazahstan 73 104 105 98 101 145 113 113 109 109 104 105,4<br />
Ukraine 80 75 96 92 92 100 103 104 116 105 98 109,5
190<br />
180<br />
170<br />
160<br />
150<br />
140<br />
130<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Georgia 81 136 107 78 100,1 121 112 116 136 143 125 97<br />
Azerbaijan 104 102 130 61 91 111 95 109 136 185 147 102,7<br />
Armenia 107 76 74 85 70 130 121 108 134 97 150 113,2<br />
Kazahstan 154 110 94 71 72 155 113 83 136 137 99,3 137,1<br />
Ukraine 124 106 75 75 77 138 104 94 138 142 126 118<br />
<br />
<br />
220<br />
200<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Georgia 147 123 145 83 154 148 89 102 133 135 144 130,5<br />
Azerbaijan 93 97 118 93 192 210 139 92 117 133 115 158,1<br />
Armenia 176 160 85 102 125 130 111 162 136 107 131 100,7<br />
Kazahstan 174 115 129 92 135 148 93 125 133 161 149 137,4<br />
Ukraine 133 113 124 98 99 121 115 117 125 142 98 109,4
Year Quarter<br />
Georgia -<br />
total<br />
City of<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Abkhazia<br />
AR<br />
Adjara AR Guria<br />
region<br />
Imereti<br />
region<br />
Kakheti<br />
region<br />
of which:<br />
Mtskheta-<br />
Mtianeti<br />
region<br />
Racha-<br />
Lechkhumi<br />
region<br />
Samegrelo-<br />
Zemo<br />
Svaneti<br />
region<br />
Samtskhe-<br />
Javaketi<br />
region<br />
Turnover in enterprises sphere by regions<br />
mln. GEL <br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br />
3975.2 2133.5 418.6 32.4 360.1 117.2 61.3 17.1 189.8 59.2 364.7 95.8<br />
4595.6 2739.7 396.7 26.5 330.3 89.0 58.2 14.2 184.3 71.3 335.8 140.3<br />
5523.0 3330.0 423.4 27.9 380.9 101.3 80.8 14.4 243.4 84.2 420.7 209.7<br />
7248.4 4455.7 383.1 35.4 406.7 123.1 114.2 14.6 339.7 98.0 522.2 195.1<br />
8464.3 5147.6 513.0 48.1 493.8 160.7 114.1 21.4 425.8 134.9 606.0 269.0<br />
2342.7 1647.1 114.8 9.4 108.8 38.7 29.0 3.5 90.0 35.3 188.0 64.6<br />
Share <br />
100.0 53.7 10.5 0.8 9.1 2.9 1.5 0.4 4.8 1.5 9.2 2.4<br />
100.0 59.6 8.6 0.6 7.2 1.9 1.3 0.3 4.0 1.6 7.3 3.1<br />
100.0 60.3 7.7 0.5 6.9 1.8 1.5 0.3 4.4 1.5 7.6 3.8<br />
100.0 61.5 5.3 0.5 5.6 1.7 1.6 0.2 4.7 1.4 7.2 2.7<br />
100.0 60.8 6.1 0.6 5.8 1.9 1.3 0.3 5.0 1.6 7.2 3.2<br />
100.0 70.3 4.9 0.4 4.6 1.7 1.2 0.1 3.8 1.5 8.0 2.8<br />
<br />
Kvemo<br />
Kartli<br />
region<br />
Shida<br />
Kartli<br />
region
Turnover in mnl GEL<br />
8 000<br />
7 000<br />
6 000<br />
5 000<br />
4 000<br />
3 000<br />
Turnover in enterprices by regions 2001-2006<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Georgia<br />
Adjara<br />
Guria<br />
Imereti<br />
Kakheti<br />
MchetaMtianeti<br />
RachaLechkhumi<br />
SamegreloSvaneti<br />
SamtskheJavaheti<br />
KvemoKartli<br />
ShidaKartli<br />
2 000<br />
1 000<br />
0<br />
<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
YEARS<br />
<br />
<br />
mln GEL Minimum Maximum<br />
Mean<br />
in years 2001 - 2006<br />
RachaLechkhumi 3.50 21.40 14.20<br />
Guria 9.40 48.10 29.95<br />
MchetaMtianeti 29.00 114.20 76.26<br />
SamtskheJavaheti 35.30 134.90 80.48<br />
Kakheti 38.70 160.70 105.00<br />
ShidaKartli 64.60 269.00 162.41<br />
SamegreloSvaneti 90.00 425.80 245.50<br />
Imereti 108.80 493.80 346.76<br />
Adjara 114.80 513.00 374.93<br />
KvemoKartli 188.00 606.00 406.23<br />
Tbilisi 1647.10 5147.60 3242.26<br />
Georgia 2342.70 8464.30 5358.20
100%<br />
Turnover in in enterprises sphere by regions in 2005<br />
8 000<br />
7 000<br />
80%<br />
6 000<br />
Percent<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
5 148<br />
5 000<br />
4 000<br />
3 000<br />
Total value in GEL<br />
2 000<br />
20%<br />
1 000<br />
0%<br />
Tbilisi<br />
606 513 494 426 269 161 135 114 48 21<br />
Adjara<br />
KvemoKartli<br />
0<br />
SamegreloSvaneti Kakheti MchetaMtianeti RachaLechkhumi<br />
Imereti ShidaKartli SamtskheJavaheti Guria
Year Quarter<br />
Georgia -<br />
total<br />
City of<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Abkhazia<br />
AR<br />
Adjara AR Guria<br />
region<br />
Imereti<br />
region<br />
Kakheti<br />
region<br />
of which:<br />
Mtskheta-<br />
Mtianeti<br />
region<br />
Racha-<br />
Lechkhumi<br />
region<br />
Samegrelo-<br />
Zemo<br />
Svaneti<br />
region<br />
Samtskhe-<br />
Javaketi<br />
region<br />
Kvemo<br />
Kartli<br />
region<br />
Shida<br />
Kartli<br />
region<br />
Number of employed persons in enterprises sphere by regions<br />
persons <br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br />
313370 140468 28388 5589 44192 13537 5924 2541 21815 6980 26164 13268<br />
301310 143556 25957 4990 38976 11714 5289 2491 18907 6177 23521 11837<br />
297795 141674 25500 4640 39130 11368 5058 2595 17765 6292 23479 12000<br />
322779 148984 24648 4402 33591 10823 5629 2321 18328 5463 23519 9831<br />
310989 138166 25682 4033 33543 10832 5667 2365 18993 5787 24883 10636<br />
297852 164861 22463 3430 32974 10811 4951 1726 17422 5412 22466 10475<br />
Share <br />
100.0 44.8 9.1 1.8 14.1 4.3 1.9 0.8 7.0 2.2 8.3 4.2<br />
100.0 47.6 8.6 1.7 12.9 3.9 1.8 0.8 6.3 2.1 7.8 3.9<br />
100.0 47.6 8.6 1.6 13.1 3.8 1.7 0.9 6.0 2.1 7.9 4.0<br />
100.0 46.2 7.6 1.4 10.4 3.4 1.7 0.7 5.7 1.7 7.3 3.0<br />
100.0 44.4 8.3 1.3 10.8 3.5 1.8 0.8 6.1 1.9 8.0 3.4<br />
100.0 55.4 7.5 1.2 11.1 3.6 1.7 0.6 5.8 1.8 7.5 3.5
Number of employed<br />
350 000<br />
300 000<br />
250 000<br />
200 000<br />
150 000<br />
100 000<br />
Employed in enterprises sphere by<br />
regions 2001-2006<br />
Georgia<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Adjara<br />
Guria<br />
Imereti<br />
Kakheti<br />
MchetaMtianeti<br />
RachaLechkhumi<br />
SamegreloSvaneti<br />
SamtskheJavaheti<br />
KvemoKartli<br />
50 000<br />
0<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
YEARS<br />
<br />
<br />
Ascending rank Minimum Maximum<br />
Mean employment in<br />
years 2001 - 2006<br />
RachaLechkhumi 1726.00 2595.00 2339<br />
Guria 3430.00 5589.00 4514<br />
MchetaMtianeti 4951.00 5924.00 5419<br />
SamtskheJavaheti 5412.00 6980.00 6018<br />
ShidaKartli 9831.00 13268.00 11341<br />
Kakheti 10811.00 13537.00 11514<br />
Samegrelo Svaneti 17422.00 21815.00 18871<br />
KvemoKartli 22466.00 26164.00 24005<br />
Adjara 22463.00 28388.00 25439<br />
Imereti 32974.00 44192.00 37067<br />
Tbilisi 138166.00 164861.00 146284<br />
Georgia 297795.00 322779.00 307349
100%<br />
Employment in enterprises sphere by regions in 2006 1st Q<br />
300 000<br />
Percent of total employment<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
20%<br />
164 861<br />
250 000<br />
200 000<br />
150 000<br />
100 000<br />
50 000<br />
Employment<br />
0%<br />
Tbilisi<br />
32 974<br />
22 466 22 463 17 422 10 811 10 475 5 412 4 951 3 430 1 726<br />
0<br />
KvemoKartli SamegreloSvaneti ShidaKartli MchetaMtianeti RachaLechkhumi<br />
Imereti Adjara<br />
Kakheti SamtskheJavaheti Guria
Year Quarter<br />
Georgia -<br />
total<br />
City of<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Abkhazia<br />
AR<br />
Adjara AR Guria<br />
region<br />
Imereti<br />
region<br />
Kakheti<br />
region<br />
of which:<br />
Mtskheta-<br />
Mtianeti<br />
region<br />
Racha-<br />
Lechkhumi<br />
region<br />
Samegrelo-<br />
Zemo<br />
Svaneti<br />
region<br />
Samtskhe-<br />
Javaketi<br />
region<br />
Average wages and salaries per employed persons in industry by regions<br />
GEL <br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br />
126.2 160.5 59.4 81.5 86.9 91.9 133.5 105.6 60.7 115.5 146.6 69.6<br />
139.4 155.3 77.0 61.6 85.9 123.2 169.8 126.5 72.3 135.6 195.6 106.5<br />
174.3 206.5 103.6 78.9 135.0 114.4 202.7 115.3 74.0 150.1 208.0 123.0<br />
201.4 229.5 130.6 89.8 156.4 163.6 202.7 183.0 80.3 176.8 259.0 138.6<br />
<br />
278.3 330.2 279.3 136.2 172.9 202.9 382.0 262.5 177.6 371.7 317.8 173.0<br />
Average wages and salaries per employed persons in enterprises sphere by regions<br />
108.4 128.6 101.7 57.2 73.1 64.0 100.8 78.2 85.4 73.3 112.0 78.3<br />
119.9 132.4 125.0 57.8 80.4 78.7 117.4 80.6 101.2 77.7 145.1 100.6<br />
139.4 154.8 130.5 71.7 106.6 74.1 139.6 79.2 122.7 84.9 159.3 119.1<br />
161.6 184.9 136.7 74.9 100.4 97.7 139.6 106.5 150.5 117.4 183.8 91.4<br />
<br />
270.0 306.5 349.7 90.5 148.2 137.6 279.8 173.9 290.7 209.4 242.6 136.4<br />
<br />
Kvemo<br />
Kartli<br />
region<br />
Shida<br />
Kartli<br />
region
Ascending rank Minimum Maximum<br />
Mean wages in years<br />
2001-2004<br />
Guria 57.20 90.50 70.4200<br />
Kakheti 64.00 137.60 90.4200<br />
ShidaKartli 78.30 119.10 97.3500<br />
Imereti 73.10 148.20 101.7400<br />
RachaLechkhumi 78.20 173.90 103.6800<br />
SamskoJavaheti 73.30 209.40 112.5400<br />
SamegreloSvaneti 85.40 290.70 150.1000<br />
MchetaMt 100.80 279.80 155.4400<br />
Georgia 108.40 270.00 159.8600<br />
KwemoKartli 112.00 242.60 168.5600<br />
Adjara 101.70 349.70 168.7200<br />
Tbilisi 128.60 306.50 181.4400<br />
<br />
<br />
Employment in enterprises - Georgia<br />
325000<br />
320000<br />
315000<br />
310000<br />
305000<br />
300000<br />
Employment vs. wages in Georgia<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2006<br />
295000<br />
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300<br />
Avarage wages in Georgia in GEL
Employment in enterprices - Tbilisi<br />
165000<br />
160000<br />
155000<br />
150000<br />
145000<br />
Employment vs. wages in Tbilisi<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2006<br />
140000<br />
125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325<br />
Avarage wages in Tbilisi in GEL<br />
<br />
Tbilisi<br />
(VA)<br />
Georgia<br />
(GDP)<br />
In mln GEL 1996 2000 2005 2000 2005<br />
Agriculture 0.2 9.1 8.2 1 245.0 1 717.7<br />
Mining 40.9 85.3<br />
Manufacturing 157.2* 262.5 535.3 516.7 991.1<br />
Supply of Electricity, Natural Gas and Water 263.3 325.9<br />
Production by Households 28.5 19.7 223.3 406.8<br />
Constructions 41.1 120.0 276.7 224.7 1 015.3<br />
Trade 323.3 275.2 422.1 762.3 1 315.7<br />
Hotels and Restaurants 141.1 328.2<br />
Transport 52.0 226.9 417.4 707.8 990.8<br />
Post and Telecommunication 151.0 471.7<br />
Financial Intermediation 15.8 88.3 230.9<br />
Real Estate 26.3 110.4 334.7<br />
Public Administration 3.5 84.9 263.3 202.8 750.5<br />
Education 13.5 65.8 127.6 213.7 382.0<br />
Health and Social Work 15.0 123.6 157.5 314.2 389.4<br />
Other Community, Social and Personal Cervices 15.3 196.7 363.6<br />
Hired Employment in Households 15.3 9.4<br />
Indirect Assessment of the Use of Financial Brokerage<br />
in Business Activity<br />
-55.4 -129.7
in mln GEL 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Agriculture, forestry, fishery 15.4 8.1 9.1 6.8 2.6 4.8 27.7 8.2<br />
Processing by domestic agriculture 33.2 33.9 28.5 36.8 42.8 45.9 51.3 19.7<br />
Industry 173.3 219.0 262.5 273.1 313.1 363.2 373.3 535.3<br />
Constructions 108.9 79.5 120.0 108.0 150.6 202.0 247.7 276.7<br />
Trade and technical service 166.4 201.8 275.2 291.7 351.2 380.5 401.1 422.1<br />
Transport, store industry and 211.7 258.7 226.9 248.5 266.5 326.6 350.4 417.4<br />
communication<br />
State government, self defense 82.9 77.3 84.9 96.8 117.2 126.3 196.3 263.3<br />
Education 41.6 54.8 65.8 75.0 81.2 92.9 121.3 127.6<br />
Health care 88.8 94.4 123.6 121.9 142.3 115.9 104.4 157.5<br />
Other kinds of services 398.4 451.2 419.7 426.9 613.4 612.0 532.6 772.4<br />
The whole additional cost 1320.5 1478.8 1616.2 1685.5 2080.9 2270.2 2406.1 3000.2<br />
<br />
Key conclusions for the Tbilisi benchmarking part:<br />
1. The economy of Tbilisi is of key importance for the national economy. Since<br />
2003 it generates over 60% of the turnover in enterprise sphere in relation to<br />
other regions of the country. In this aspect Tbilisi is the national leader.<br />
2. Every year the employment in Tbilisi economy exceeds 40% of the total<br />
number of jobs in the enterprise sphere in all regions of Georgia.<br />
3. The level of salaries is significantly higher than in other regions both in the<br />
enterprise sphere and in the manufacturing sector. It is even three times higher<br />
than in the region where salaries are lowest (Seida Karli).<br />
4. Since the late 1990s the industrial production sector has been manufacturing<br />
less and less advanced technology products, i.e. the ones of the highest added<br />
value impact (electric engines, trucks, elements for air industry).<br />
5. Recent introduction into official statistics of the data concerning the growing<br />
number of computers, particularly notebook computers, is the element which<br />
may point out a new direction in the development of local economy.
The improvement of environment that businesses work in is one of the priorities of the<br />
Georgian government. In spite of the fact that many issues should be solved in the<br />
near future it has to be said that many steps have been taken to stimulate economic<br />
activities of Georgian citizens in recent years. The World Bank’s and the International<br />
Finance Corporation’s (IFC) Doing Business report can be reviewed to assess current<br />
situation and take actions in this field. The World Bank has assessed the conditions<br />
and environment which the businesses, especially small and medium ones, have to<br />
face in different countries. The database called “Doing Business” presents indicators<br />
of business regulations and their enforcement. The Doing Business collects data and<br />
provides comparable indicators across 175 worlds economies. It analyses the<br />
regulatory costs of business and can be used to analyze specific regulations that<br />
enhance or constrain investment, productivity, and growth. The Doing Business<br />
project covers ten topics of business environment:<br />
• starting a business<br />
• dealing with licensing<br />
• employing workers<br />
• registering property<br />
• getting credit<br />
• protecting investors<br />
• paying taxes<br />
• trading across borders<br />
• enforcing contracts<br />
• closing business.<br />
“Georgia was the top reformer in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)<br />
and was the leader in the global top 10 reformers’ rankings as far as the ease of doing<br />
business in 2005–2006 is concerned, according to the report.<br />
Georgia made enormous improvements to many areas of its business regulations and<br />
jumped over an astonishing 75 places in the rankings in just one year, moving from<br />
112th place to number 37, Georgia’s annual leap in the rankings was the furthest<br />
since the Doing Business report was launched four years ago. It just shows how far a<br />
country can go if it is committed to reforms. Georgia improved its business startup<br />
procedures, dramatically improved its customs procedures, introduced specialized<br />
courts, streamlined labor regulations, introduced a credit bureau, and enormously cut<br />
the number of licenses. The country has seen a 55 percent increase in the number of<br />
new businesses being registered. In addition, the unemployment rate fell by 2<br />
percent.” says Caralee McLiesh, a co-founder of the Doing Business project.<br />
1 Chapter based on The World Bank’s and the International Finance Corporation’s (IFC) Doing Business report.
In addition to being the leading global reformer, Georgia was the leading reformer in<br />
three of the specific areas studied by the report:<br />
(1) Dealing with licenses: The report looks specifically at construction licenses and<br />
permits, and this year Georgia created a one-stop shop for building permits. Shorter<br />
time limits for the issuance of permits were introduced, and several unnecessary<br />
procedures were eliminated.<br />
(2) Enforcing contracts: Georgia established specialized commercial sections in the<br />
courts. Also, the supreme court can now decide which cases to review. Previously, it<br />
dealt with every case sent by the lower courts. In addition, Georgia has been striving<br />
to reduce corruption in the courts by increasing judges’ salaries and more<br />
aggressively investigating corruption and taking disciplinary measures against judges.<br />
(3) Employing workers: The new labor code eases restrictions on the duration of<br />
term contracts and overtime work. The new law provides for one month’s severance<br />
pay, replacing complex rules requiring varying notice periods and the involvement of<br />
labor unions and the Ministry of Labor. Georgia also reduced the social security<br />
contributions paid on wages by businesses from 31% to 20%. Together, these<br />
changes make Georgia the sixth easiest place to employ workers globally (after the<br />
Marshall Islands, United States, Singapore, Tonga, and the Maldives). In addition,<br />
Georgia made strides in increasing the ease of starting business. Georgia reduced the<br />
minimum capital required to start a new business from 2,000 lari to 200 (US$85). As a<br />
result, business registrations rose by 55 percent from 2006 to 2006, reflecting both the<br />
creation of new businesses and the registration of companies formerly operating in the<br />
shadow economy. In the area of getting credit, Georgia also has made some<br />
legislative changes to facilitate the exchange of credit information, and a private credit<br />
bureau began to support the exchange of information among banks.<br />
While Georgia is the leading reformer this year, there are still several areas where<br />
there is considerable room for improvement. In the ease of paying taxes, for example,<br />
Georgia ranks only 104 globally. Although tax reform in previous years has simplified<br />
taxes and decreased rates, a company still spends about 53 days per year to pay<br />
taxes. Georgia also is relatively poorly ranked in closing a business (ranked at 86),<br />
suggesting a need for bankruptcy reform. Another priority area is trading across<br />
borders, where Georgia ranks at 95, due to a relatively high cost to import and export<br />
and a large number of required procedures.<br />
Finally, Georgia ranks only 135 on protecting investors, lower than most of its CIS<br />
colleagues. The International Finance Corporation is engaged on the ground in<br />
supporting Georgia’s reform efforts. With support from BP and the Government of<br />
Canada, it provides technical assistance in the area of SME policy work. The IFC<br />
SME Policy Project tightly cooperates with the Georgian government to further<br />
improve two regulatory issues: inspections and permits/licenses. The project is<br />
working on streamlining licensing and inspecting procedures according to international<br />
best practices. It also conducts regular surveys of entrepreneurs, providing first-hand<br />
information on administrative barriers hindering business growth. The IFC SME survey<br />
reports provide clear recommendations for improvement to the government. The<br />
survey instrument is also used to measure the effect of administrative reforms on<br />
businesses against a baseline established by IFC’s first Georgia survey, conducted in<br />
2004. Recently, the project has finalized its second survey, polling 1880 SMEs in 11<br />
regions throughout Georgia. The survey covers 4 key issues for SME sector<br />
development: licenses and permits, inspection system, tax administration and exportimport<br />
procedures, the World Bank noted in Doing Business 2007: ”Georgia makes<br />
an unprecedented jump up the global rankings” http://web.worldbank.org/
Tbilisi development in the beginning of the 20th century is characterized by an<br />
increasing population and high construction activity. In the middle of 1950s the<br />
massive construction of housing settlements and following branches of industry<br />
began: machinery construction (including military sector), electronics and<br />
microelectronics, light industry, construction, food processing, timber reprocessing,<br />
pharmaceutical and perfume industry, based on the imported raw materials,<br />
technologies and norms. It had a guaranteed market to sell those products.<br />
After the collapse of Soviet Union Tbilisi industry practically stopped existing. Since<br />
2004 the capital city has been undergong revitalization process of its economy base,<br />
looking for a new development factors. At the time of dissolution of the USRR in 1991<br />
Georgia inherited a rather diversified sector of industry – a wide range of industrial<br />
enterprises, from food and timber processing, production of fertilizers, and coal and<br />
magnesium ore mining, to steel and non ferrous metallurgy. Many of these industries<br />
have been, and still remain, unique natural monopolies in the broader region. The<br />
dissolution of the USSR was accompanied by the fracturing of supply lines and the<br />
elimination of the soviet –time guaranteed state contracts. Georgian industry declined<br />
dramatically.<br />
The recovery and growth of industry resulted from political and economic stabilization.<br />
A great number of industrial enterprises were privatized or transformed into joint-stock<br />
companies. The restructuring of oversized Soviet-style mega enterprises facilitated the<br />
creation of economically efficient competitive industries as well as the development of<br />
small and medium size businesses in the sector.
STRENGTHS<br />
• State and economy reforms after “Rose<br />
revolution”<br />
• Increase in population<br />
• Development of cooperation with foreign<br />
partners and international institutions<br />
• Growing number of visitors<br />
• Improving technical infrastructure<br />
• Beauty of city architecture and city cultural<br />
heritage and unique city center<br />
• Growing public budget revenues and public<br />
investment<br />
• Growing wages and community incomes<br />
• Improved access to funding for citizens and<br />
companies<br />
• Improving municipal services and growing<br />
quality of life<br />
• Increased number of companies<br />
• Increase of foreign investments<br />
• Rapid growth of service and construction<br />
sector<br />
• Growing number of university students<br />
• Large share of people with university<br />
education in the city’s population<br />
• Existing land for production/services<br />
investments and housing<br />
WEAKNESSES<br />
• Decrease of young population<br />
• Poor recognition of the city abroad<br />
• Insufficient funds for quick development tasks<br />
completion<br />
• De-capitalisation of large part of housing and<br />
infrastructure resources; large share of low quality<br />
public space<br />
• Depreciated large post-industrial areas<br />
• Collapse of traditional economy and closing of<br />
many factories that were functioning in the city<br />
before what resulted with huge reductions of work<br />
places<br />
• City economic base still is largely traditional with<br />
limited growth potential<br />
• Workforce without qualifications in new sectors of<br />
city economy<br />
• Low innovation level of local economy – generally<br />
low earning and low asset base type economy<br />
• Insufficient network of roads and bridges<br />
• Small demand for new workers<br />
• Low quality of workforce development services and<br />
programs<br />
• High crime rate and the sense of insecurity among<br />
residents and visitors<br />
• Decrease in work places and growing<br />
unemployment rate<br />
• Large share of educated people among the<br />
unemployed<br />
• Export of raw materials and low processed goods<br />
• Negative balance in foreign exchange<br />
• Significant number of people living in poverty<br />
• Pay gap between men and women<br />
• Lack of highly processed “flag products” to be<br />
exported by the City<br />
• Overstaffed education<br />
• Insufficient level of domestic capital investments<br />
• Poor competitiveness of local business on<br />
international markets<br />
• Significant share of grey area in local economy
OPPORTUNIETIES<br />
• Farther legal changes improving business<br />
environment<br />
• Cooperation with the European Union and other<br />
international organizations<br />
• Access to the international donors funds and<br />
technical assistance<br />
• Positive economic prognoses (growing GDP)<br />
• The chance given to foreign business to invest<br />
various segments of economy, especially in the<br />
advanced technology area<br />
• The farther reform of public finances<br />
• Shrinkage of informal economy<br />
• Development of business institutional<br />
infrastructure (business organizations -<br />
chambers, clusters, associations, access to<br />
funding, access space for business and access<br />
to technical assistance)<br />
• Growing employment in public and market<br />
services<br />
• Transformation of education system following<br />
requirements of labour market<br />
• Opportunities for development of tourism<br />
industry<br />
• Development of Tbilisi metropolitan area<br />
• Improved education level<br />
• Investments in education<br />
• Promotion of local business<br />
• Better access to human resources in metro area<br />
• Improved incoming and outcoming<br />
transportation<br />
• Favourable conditions for the development of<br />
sport, leisure and tourism as well as for<br />
organisation of important events.<br />
• Development of infrastructure in the European<br />
transport corridors, investment in roads, airports,<br />
ports and new railway connections<br />
THREATS<br />
• Slowdown of reforms<br />
• Negative demographic changes<br />
• Emigration of young people and qualified<br />
workers<br />
• Growing number of people without incomes<br />
form work and growing number of families in<br />
poverty.<br />
• Economic barriers disturbing the access to<br />
health, educational and cultural services<br />
• Missing the chances offered by foreign<br />
institutions and donors to improve the quality<br />
of life and to develop the economy<br />
• Growing unemployment of young people<br />
• Low level of education<br />
• Lack of educational services outside traditional<br />
schooling<br />
• Lack of strong research institutions that can<br />
transfer innovation and knowledge to local<br />
companies<br />
• Lack of products that are competitive on<br />
international markets<br />
• Week cooperation and networking between<br />
firms and private and public institutions.<br />
• Deepening deficit in foreign trade<br />
• Growth of inflation and increase of living and<br />
business costs<br />
• Macroeconomic changes and global<br />
competition<br />
• The wave of bankruptcies and closedowns<br />
• Economic growth depending on foreign capital,<br />
know-how and technology.
Good outcomes reflecting the satisfying condition of Tbilisi economy, when compared<br />
to the rest of the country, results from the fact that the city does not face any<br />
competition as far as economic indices are concerned. Other regions perform much<br />
worse than the City of Tbilisi.<br />
The authors of new programmes of economic development have to consider the fact<br />
that their impact will not be restricted only to the metropolitan area of Tbilisi, but that<br />
they will strongly influence the national economy. The increase of economic indicators<br />
is built mainly on the growing production of low processed goods (e.g. cement, sawn<br />
wood) and on the export of raw materials (such as ores), which will not contribute to<br />
the economic growth and increased competitiveness on foreign markets. Also, these<br />
segments will not attract technology transfer and will not generate new, competitive<br />
products.<br />
As a result of economy transformation Tbilisi lost its traditional industries that were<br />
generating incomes and workplaces for decades. Schools, universities and supporting<br />
institutions were organized around them. Now, when most of old factories do not<br />
operate any more all these institutions should transform their activities or will be closed<br />
down too.<br />
To create Tbilisi new economy profile and face competition of global markets new city<br />
products should be identified and new institutional infrastructure should be developed<br />
to support key city development possibilities. Cluster networks should grow around<br />
competitive city products that will be identified. Workforce development programs<br />
should be created to support young people entering labour market and those who<br />
need to change or improve their qualifications. Schools and vocational training<br />
institutions should develop new educational programs to prepare qualified workforce<br />
for the new sectors of economy. To build foundations for knowledge-based economy<br />
the research institutions should offer companies new management and production<br />
technologies. The whole range of institutions is needed to offer funding to growing<br />
companies (credit, capital and guarantees). Business networks, organizations,<br />
consulting and marketing companies will help companies and their products enter<br />
new markets and compete with foreign companies. Public institutions should<br />
participate in the process of supporting promotion campaigns, offering good quality<br />
space and qualified workforce for all new generation of firms and institution, in order<br />
to build international reputation and recognition of the city.
USD thds<br />
the name of the group 2000 2005<br />
all 322 821.1 865 892.4<br />
livestock 8.1 15.6<br />
meat and meat products 303.2 533.0<br />
fish and crustacea molluscs and other invertebrates 135.5 992.3<br />
sea products, bird eggs, natural honey 42.8 2 625.5<br />
products of animal origin, not settled on the other place - 0.4<br />
alive plants, cut flowers and decorative grass 216.3 873.6<br />
vegetables and roots and bulbs good for feed 560.3 1 053.6<br />
fruit and nut good for feed, crust and skin of citrus 22 255.0 76 937.3<br />
coffee, tea and condiments 7 269.8 5 199.5<br />
bread cereals 1 184.4 6 152.6<br />
flour production, starch, wheat 1 900.6 1 926.9<br />
seed and fruit of plants, plants for medical and technical purposes 1 193.5 2 579.0<br />
pitches and other vegetable juices and extracts 5.0 215.9<br />
other products from plant origin, not settled on the other place 4.4 42.1<br />
fats and oils and the products of their processing, prepared food, fats<br />
and albumens 32.3 203.0<br />
prepared food with meat, fish or roots or with sea invertebrates 67.3 41.3<br />
sugar and confectionery products from sugar 2 844.1 30 571.4<br />
cocoa and products with it 12.3 1 094.5<br />
prepared food with grain, flour starch or milk, flour confectionery<br />
products 161.7 84.4<br />
vegetables fruit, nuts or plants processing products 1 117.0 5 445.4<br />
various products of feed 381.8 829.9<br />
alcoholic and not alcoholic drinks and vinegar 46 857.2 164 356.7<br />
remains of feed industry, prepared food for animals 4.6 782.8<br />
tobacco and industrial substitutes of tobacco 6 119.3 1 345.8<br />
salt, sulfur, ground and stone, plaster stuff, limestone and cement 1 371.6 18 461.5<br />
ores slag and ashes 29 767.1 38 386.9<br />
mineral fuel, oil and oil products 26 267.1 27 952.6<br />
norganic products of chemistry, admixture of metal radio-active<br />
elements 5 686.4 7 358.9<br />
substances of organic chemistry 100.4 367.6<br />
pharmaceutical products 5 226.9 4 009.0<br />
fertilizers 16 191.5 35 838.6<br />
paint extracts and substances, spots, inks 757.9 1 050.9<br />
etheroils, perfume cosmetics and toilet means 1 099.8 8 295.3<br />
soup, washing and cleaning means, waxes, candles 53.3 966.3
albumonous substances, modified drinks, glues 3.6 0.1<br />
explosive substances, matches - 58.5<br />
photo and cinema 4.9 52.6<br />
other chemistry products 3 048.7 509.9<br />
plastics and their products 1 334.5 472.5<br />
cauthchouc, rubber and their products 95.0 178.5<br />
uncultivated leather and leather materials (except natural fur) and<br />
leather 2 216.3 1 510.5<br />
leather products and harness 104.6 168.0<br />
natural and artificial fur and their products - -<br />
wood and its products, tree coal 7 491.7 16 262.5<br />
cork and its products 0.0 43.5<br />
straw and other wittling products, baskets and wittling products 0.0 0.7<br />
wood or other fibrous cellulose products 3.6 -<br />
paper and cardboard, products of paper mass, paper or cardboard 611.2 625.4<br />
printed books, newspapers and other polygraphic industry 38.1 263.3<br />
silk 105.9 7.0<br />
wool, thin and rough fur of animals, cloth of horse-hair 5.8 62.3<br />
cotton 11.7 -<br />
chemical threads 1.0 1.9<br />
chemical fibres 36.8 124.6<br />
cotton, thick felt and not knitting clothes, special thread, ropes and<br />
cables 44.6 11.7<br />
carpets and other loom floor cover 16.0 5.9<br />
special clothes, laces, tapestries 9.0 4.1<br />
loom materials, saturated, duplicated, technical loom products 0.8 3.3<br />
stockinet linen hand or machine woven - 0.2<br />
stockinet clothes and cloth parts hand or machine woven 96.1 298.6<br />
loom clothes and cloth parts 915.3 8 265.0<br />
other prepared loom products, used cloths and loom products 164.6 219.6<br />
shoes, gaiters and analogical products, their parts 1 523.3 131.0<br />
karchives and their parts 7.0 2.5<br />
umbrellas, crutches, whips for horse riding 1.0 11.2<br />
manufactured feathering and its products, artificial flowers - 0.2<br />
stone, plaster, cement, mica or the production of analogical kind 46.2 263.1<br />
ceramic products 44.8 388.1<br />
glass and its products 1 409.3 452.5<br />
pearl, stones, precious metals and their products 1 576.3 39 413.6<br />
black metals 53 449.9 167 709.8<br />
black metals and their products 3 037.3 4 080.5<br />
copper and its products 4 348.4 11 624.4<br />
nickel and its products 20.1 -<br />
aluminum and its products 17 594.8 11 842.1<br />
mixed doods 78.3 -<br />
bullet and its products 84.1 538.2<br />
zinc and its products 74.6 86.5<br />
other non-precious metals, metal-ceramic and its products 514.7 146.6<br />
instruments, their parts from non-precious metals 1 917.9 163.4<br />
other products from non-precious metals 10.9 245.7
atomic reactors, installations and mechanic products, their parts 18 683.2 29 702.7<br />
electric machines and installations, their parts 4 666.5 5 080.5<br />
locomotives, movable composition and their parts 1 227.3 2 944.9<br />
overground transport means, except railway or tram movable<br />
composition 1 247.3 25 029.8<br />
flying apparatus, cosmic apparatus and their parts 11 230.5 78 197.9<br />
ships and other swimming means 1 618.8 6 106.4<br />
optical, photographical measuring, control, medical instruments and<br />
apparatus 224.3 1 215.0<br />
clocks and their parts 8.3 46.4<br />
musical instruments and their parts 24.8 32.3<br />
weapon and fire arms 1 319.2 149.3<br />
furniture, lighting, building constructions 354.1 4 143.4<br />
toys, games and sporting stock, their parts 107.9 183.2<br />
other prepared products 725.8 187.0<br />
art production, collection things and their antiquary 85.7 33.7<br />
<br />
<br />
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
(In millions of lari)<br />
Nominal GDP at market prices 4.555 5.022 5.669 6.015 6.648 7.457 8.565 9.970<br />
Nominal GDP at factor prices 4.285 4.782 5.342 5.649 6.212 6.961 8.042 9.135<br />
Share in GDP (at factor prices)<br />
(In percent of GDP)<br />
Agriculture, forestry, fishing 29.2 27.6 26.2 21.6 22.1 20.6 20.6 17.8<br />
Mining and quarrying 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9<br />
Manufacturing 10.7 8.9 8.8 9.1 8.3 9.0 9.3 9.8<br />
Electricity, gas and water supply 3.3 3.8 4.7 4.7 4.1 4.5 4.0 3.5<br />
Processing products by household 5.4 5.0 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.4<br />
Constructions 3.8 4.9 4.0 4.0 4.2 5.5 6.8 6.8<br />
Trade services, repair services 11.8 11.0 12.2 13.5 14.0 13.7 14.1 14.4<br />
Restaurant and hotel services 2.1 2.0 2.6 2.5 3.1 3.1 3.8 4.5<br />
Transport and storage 6.7 9.4 10.0 12.5 11.7 12.0 10.9 10.4<br />
Communications 1.5 2.1 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.9<br />
Financial intermediation 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.4<br />
Real estate, renting and business activities 9.7 8.9 7.9 7.5 7.3 6.4 6.4 6.5<br />
Public administration and defense 4.0 4.1 3.7 3.6 3.9 4.2 3.8 6.3<br />
Education 2.9 2.9 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.5 3.8<br />
Health care and social services 3.7 4.7 4.5 5.6 5.2 5.0 4.3 3.7<br />
Other community, social and personal 3.7 3.6 3.2 3.5 3.1 2.8 3.1 3.7<br />
service activities<br />
Private households with employed persons 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />
Nominal GDP at basic prices 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
.<br />
<br />
(In thousand of tons, unless<br />
otherwise indicated)<br />
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Fuel and energy<br />
Electric power<br />
7.2 8.1 8.1 7.5 6.9 7.3 7.2 6.9<br />
(in billions of kWh)<br />
Coal 4.6 14.7 12.0 7.3 5.0 6.0 8.0 8.0<br />
Oil 133.8 119.2 91.3 109.5 98.8 73.9 139.7 97.6<br />
Natural gas<br />
79.5 40.2 16.7 17.8 10.9<br />
(in millions of m3)<br />
Gasoline 4.4 ... 3.6 1.8 ... ... 0.1 3.3<br />
Diesel fuel 8.1 13.8 22.3 8.8 2.0 0.9 3.7 14.7<br />
Fuel oil („Mazut“) 12.4 15.9 23.2 16.0 8.6 13.6 12.8 16.2<br />
Metallurgy<br />
Cast- iron 1.1 0.1 ... 0.0<br />
Steel 103.2 56.4 7.0 0.1<br />
Finished roll steel ferrous metal 86.7 42.7 7.2 1.4<br />
Steel pipes 23.5 8.5 0.1 0.2<br />
Manganese ore 14.2 16.0 54.9 63.1 98.4 130.4 173.5 218.7<br />
Electro- ferro manganese 0.0 3.4 4.9 0.6 0.1 ... ... ...<br />
Machine- building<br />
Subversive electric motors (in 329.0 74.0 63.0 559.0 402.0 44.0 217.0 25.0<br />
units)<br />
A/C motors (in thousands of kW) 0.1 ... ... ... ... ... ... ...<br />
Electric welding equipment 0.0 0.0 ... ... ... ... ... ...<br />
(in thousands of units)<br />
Metal- cutting machines<br />
28.0 21.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 9.0 30.0 4.0<br />
(in units)<br />
Main- line locomotives<br />
... ... ... 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0<br />
(in units)<br />
Trucks (in thousands of units) 82.0 39.0 38.0 44.0 4.0 ... ... ...<br />
Chemical/ timber products<br />
Mineral fertilizers 80.9 55.4 95.1 100.2 39.2 83.2 89.9 98.8<br />
Chemical fibers and threads 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 ... ... ...<br />
Synthetic ammoniac 102.1 77.5 126.6 136.2 57.9 111.3 124.4 131.2<br />
Synthetic detergents<br />
46.8 10.9 ... ... ... ... ... ...<br />
(in tons)<br />
Sawn wood<br />
(in thousands of m3)<br />
16.7 33.0 34.3 42.8 43.5 51.7 71.1 69.4<br />
Construction<br />
Cement 94.1 198.6 341.4 347.7 335.2 346.8 344.8 424.6<br />
Prefabricated ferro- concrete 8.8 8.7 9.3 13.4 4.6 3.7 4.4 3.9<br />
structures<br />
(in thousands of m3)<br />
Masonry concrete and silicate 16.6 16.5 12.4 11.3 8.3 8.4 12.1 24.9<br />
blocks<br />
(in millions of units)<br />
Natural stone decorative tiles<br />
(in thousands of m3)<br />
... 14.6 10.4 12.4 14.7 11.2 13.9 22.4
General merchandise and<br />
household appliances<br />
Porcelain and faience dishware 191.6 274.2 320.5 185.9 91.8 53.8 ... ...<br />
(in thousands of units)<br />
Color TV (in units) 2037.0 1039.0 1310.0 1585.0 1170.0 11.0 ... ...<br />
Notebooks<br />
953.4 316.0 370.0 194.0 213.0 262.0 1394.0 2035.0<br />
(in thousands of units)<br />
Light industry<br />
Silk thread (in tons) 8.6 ... ... ... ... ... ... ...<br />
Cotton yarn (in tons) 167.0 62.1 6.7 ... ... ... ... ...<br />
Wool yarn (in tons) 61.4 58.7 40.0 5.0 5.0 8.0 11 1<br />
Hosiery (thousands of pairs) 57.0 11.6 0.5 0.5 15.5 16.4 13.5 11.9<br />
Knitwear<br />
76.0 59.0 14.3 10.3 2.6 2.3 0.9 ...<br />
(thousands of pairs)<br />
Footwear<br />
100.9 95.4 101.3 89.8 44.7 24.5 19.4 36.8<br />
(thousands of pairs)<br />
Basic foodstuff and foodprocessing<br />
Bread and bakery products 198.7 172.5 113.6 111.3 88.1 91.6 77.0 100.4<br />
Granulated sugar 19.7 ... 20.0 35.3 ... 47.9 91.8 86.9<br />
Meat products 963.3 1330.0 1429.0 1053.0 415.2 573.3 885.5 1589.0<br />
Meat (tons) 45.3 178.0 6.0 66.0 1.2 0.3 0.5 1.4<br />
Sausage (tons) 918.0 1152.0 1423.0 987.0 414.0 573.0 885.0 1575.0<br />
Butter (tons) 888.0 265.0 1490.0 813.0 519.0 203.0 284.0 666.0<br />
Dairy products<br />
5.4 6.6 4.6 4.2 4.8 5.5 ... ...<br />
(in terms of milk)<br />
Fat cheese (tons) 142.0 47.0 93.0 63.0 28.0 32.0 57.0 61.0<br />
Vegetable (tons) 847.0 542.0 476.0 144.0 51.0 76.0 106.0 118.0<br />
Flour 165.0 148.0 114.4 103.5 79.9 78.3 72.5 136.7<br />
Canned fruit and vegetables 9.6 2.9 6.6 11.2 29.1 28.9 28.2 20.3<br />
(mln.cans)<br />
Confectionery (tons) 235.0 277.0 154.0 144.0 101.0 112.0 336.0 498.0<br />
Packed natural tea 7.8 4.9 4.5 3.0 3.8 3.1 4.1 4.3<br />
Macaroni products (tons) 357.0 860.0 470.0 270.0 293.0 505.0 542.0 738.0<br />
Non- alcoholic beverages 4.0 2.9 2.2 2.9 3.5 3.8 6.8 8.9<br />
(in millions of decaliteres)<br />
Mineral water<br />
66.5 61.3 49.7 72.3 79.7 119.2 138.1 163.6<br />
(in milions of ½ liters)<br />
Cigarettes (in billions) 0.9 0.6 1.3 0.3 1.6 1.8 3.0 2.8<br />
Vodka and liqueurs<br />
251.0 112.7 463.8 439.4 529.0 135.9 117.7 437.7<br />
(in thousands of decaliters)<br />
Grape wine<br />
3.1 2.3 1.9 1.7 2.0 1.9 2.3 2.7<br />
(in millions of decaliters)<br />
Sparkling wine<br />
75.6 40.3 66.9 87.7 115.1 117.7 160.3 177.8<br />
(in thousands of decaliters)<br />
Brandy (in thousands of<br />
82.3 37.8 31.1 71.3 73.0 73.2 141.9 221.9<br />
decaliters)<br />
Beer (in millions of decaliters) 0.8 1.0 1.3 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.8 4.8
of which:<br />
Year<br />
of which: of which: of which:<br />
Collection, purification and<br />
distribution of water<br />
Supply of steam and hot water<br />
Supply of gas<br />
Supply of electricity<br />
Electricity, gas and water supply<br />
Manufac-ture of transport equipment<br />
Manufac-ture of electrical machinery<br />
and optical instruments<br />
manufac-ture of machinery and<br />
equipment<br />
Manufacture of basic metals and<br />
fabricated metal products<br />
Manufac-ture of other non-metalic<br />
mineral products <br />
Manufacture of rubber and plastic<br />
products<br />
Manufac-ture of chemical products<br />
Manufac-ture of oil products<br />
Manufacture of paper and publishing<br />
Manufactu-re of wood and products<br />
wood and cork<br />
Manufac-ture of textiles and textile<br />
goods<br />
Manufac-ture of food products,<br />
beverages and tobacco products<br />
Manufactu-ring<br />
Other mining and quarrying<br />
Mining of metal ores<br />
Mining of crude oil and natural gas<br />
Mining of coal<br />
Mining of eneregy producing<br />
minerals<br />
Mining and Quarrying<br />
Industry - total<br />
Number of employed persons in industry by type of economic activity ( Georgia)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25<br />
90392 6490 1550 668 882 3752 1188 58738 20330 2895 1842 3998 383 4858 612 4487 7796 1174 2351 5246 25164 16270 2445 49 6400<br />
84502 6464 1453 657 796 3901 1110 54135 18756 2636 2071 3874 87 4588 686 3630 7358 1017 1420 6554 23903 17490 2295 49 6413<br />
82004 6503 1353 527 828 1992 1158 51619 18105 1761 1995 3532 131 4508 644 3688 7181 943 1214 6745 23882 15014 2481 47 6340<br />
85385 7252 1454 525 929 4511 1287 52649 20482 2065 2152 3453 199 4551 903 4012 6271 1087 1079 5117 25484 15985 2909 263 6327<br />
83497 7596 1518 490 1028 4958 1120 52897 20139 2024 2255 3124 78 6774 931 4167 5438 823 1149 4766 23004 17080 3205 52 5924<br />
82598 7318 1076 470 606 5121 1121 51340 21124 2420 1547 3407 22 4380 1554 4324 4886 752 797 4810 23940 14185 3527 69 6159<br />
Share%<br />
100 7,2 1,7 0,8 0,9 4,2 1,3 64,9 22,5 3,2 2,0 4,4 5,3 5,3 0,7 5,0 8,6 1,3 2,6 5,9 27,9 18,0 2,7 0,1 7,1<br />
100 7,7 1,8 0,8 1,0 4,6 1,3 64,0 22,2 3,1 2,5 4,6 5,4 5,4 0,8 4,4 8,8 1,2 1,6 7,7 28,3 17,9 2,7 0,1 7,6<br />
100 7,9 1,6 0,6 1,0 4,9 1,4 62,9 22,1 2,2 2,4 4,3 5,5 5,5 0,7 4,5 8,8 1,1 1,5 8,2 29,2 18,3 3,1 0,1 7,7<br />
100 8,5 1,6 0,6 1,0 5,4 1,5 61,6 24,0 2,2 2,6 4,1 5,4 5,4 1,0 4,7 7,3 1,3 1,3 6,1 29,9 18,7 3,4 0,4 7,4<br />
100 9,1 1,8 0,6 1,2 6,0 1,3 63,4 24,1 2,4 2,8 3,7 0,1 8,1 1,1 5,0 6,6 1,0 1,3 5,7 27,5 16,5 3,8 0,1 7,1<br />
100 8,9 1,3 0,6 0,7 6,2 1,4 62,2 25,6 2,9 1,9 4,1 0,0 5,3 1,9 5,2 5,9 0,9 1,0 5,8 28,9 17,2 4,3 0,1 7,5
of which:<br />
Year<br />
of which: of which: of which:<br />
Collection, purification and<br />
distribution of water<br />
Supply of steam and hot water<br />
Supply of gas<br />
Supply of electricity<br />
Electricity, gas and water supply<br />
Manufac-ture of transport equipment<br />
Manufac-ture of electrical machinery<br />
and optical instruments<br />
manufac-ture of machinery and<br />
equipment<br />
Manufacture of basic metals and<br />
fabricated metal products<br />
Manufac-ture of other non-metalic<br />
mineral products <br />
Manufacture of rubber and plastic<br />
products<br />
Manufac-ture of chemical products<br />
Manufac-ture of oil products<br />
Manufacture of paper and publishing<br />
Manufactu-re of wood and products<br />
wood and cork<br />
Manufac-ture of textiles and textile<br />
goods<br />
Manufac-ture of food products,<br />
beverages and tobacco products<br />
Manufactu-ring<br />
Other mining and quarrying<br />
Mining of metal ores<br />
Mining of crude oil and natural gas<br />
Mining of coal<br />
Mining of eneregy producing<br />
minerals<br />
Mining and Quarrying<br />
Industry - total<br />
Turnover in industry by type of economic activity ( Georgia)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25<br />
1299 66,0 28,2 0,3 27,9 31,8 6,0 659,3 332,0 5 7,1 26,6 10,1 36,8 14,2 49,2 93,0 5,5 11,4 63,2 574,0 513 29,3 0,1 31,3<br />
1548 77,2 20,9 0,2 20,7 46,8 9,5 846,6 387,0 5 9,5 30,0 5,3 39,8 16,1 54,4 116,1 4,1 7,3 92,4 624,5 533 52,3 0,1 38,3<br />
1862 134,0 43,7 0,3 43,4 71,7 18,6 1042,7 544,7 6 12,3 40,0 16,8 79,8 20,4 80,4 125,9 7,8 9,2 137,3 685,6 575 69,7 0,1 40,8<br />
2119 136,0 38,0 0,7 38,4 85,3 11,6 1243,5 682,4 8 13,3 47,5 32,1 106,0 29,2 100,5 142,4 8,3 12,1 53,1 740,2 598 94,7 0,1 46,9<br />
2308 139,7 19,3 0,7 18,6 108,7 11,9 1438,9 785,5 13 19,6 50,7 1,3 120,3 25,9 119,4 218,2 13,8 14,1 4,6 730,1 591 100 0,1 38,7<br />
675 32,5 10,3 0,1 10,2 19,3 2,9 371,2 201,4 4 3,6 13,8 0,0 32,0 7,8 28,0 65,1 2,8 2,1 7,0 271,4 180 76,1 0,0 14,5<br />
<br />
100 5,1 2,2 0,0 2,2 2,4 0,5 50,7 25,6 0,4 0,5 2,0 0,8 2,8 1,1 3,8 7,2 0,4 0,9 4,9 44,2 39 2,3 0,0 2,4<br />
100 5,0 1,3 0,0 1,3 3,0 0,6 54,7 25,0 0,3 0,6 1,9 0,3 2,6 1,0 3,5 7,5 0,3 0,5 6,0 40,3 34 3,4 0,0 2,4<br />
100 7,2 2,3 0,0 2,3 3,9 1,0 56,0 29,3 0,4 0,7 2,1 0,9 4,3 1,1 4,3 6,8 0,4 0,5 7,4 36,8 30 3,7 0,0 2,2<br />
100 6,4 1,8 0,0 1,8 4,0 0,5 58,7 32,2 0,4 0,9 2,7 1,0 6,0 1,6 5,2 9,2 0,6 0,6 3,3 34,9 26 1,6 0,0 2,1<br />
100 6,1 0,8 0,0 0,8 4,7 0,6 62,3 34,0 6,0 0,9 2,2 0,1 5,2 1,1 5,2 9,5 0,6 0,6 0,2 31,6 25 4,3 0,0 1,7<br />
100 1,8 1,8 4,6 4,0 58,7 32,2 0,4 0,6 2,2 50,0 1,4 0,0 6,7 0,4 0,6 2,5 0,2 34,9 28,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0
<strong>LOCAL</strong><br />
<strong>ECONOMIC</strong><br />
<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />
<strong>PLAN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>TBILISI</strong><br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
CITY COMPETITIVEES<br />
ASSESSMENT<br />
Tbilisi City Hall │ Economic Policy Agency<br />
Address: 2, Liberty Sq │ Tbilisi 0105, Georgia<br />
Tel.:(+99532)932314 │ Fax.:(+99532)932895<br />
E-Mail: economic@tbilisi.gov.ge<br />
www.tbilisi.gov.ge<br />
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
City of Tbilisi Competitiveness Assessment ....................................................................................................5<br />
1. Role of cities in regional and national economy ......................................................................................5<br />
1.1. Cities take more important role in national economy.......................................................................5<br />
1.2. Tbilisi in Georgian economy..............................................................................................................7<br />
2. City competitiveness .................................................................................................................................. 18<br />
2.1. Factors of city competitiveness.............................................................................................................. 18<br />
2.2. Assessment of Tbilisi competitiveness.................................................................................................. 20<br />
3. Identification of competitive advantages of Tbilisi economy............................................................. 29<br />
3.1. Identification of city products.................................................................................................................. 29<br />
3.2. Identification of promising Tbilisi clusters .............................................................................................. 31<br />
2
CHARTS<br />
Chart 1-1 Population in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2006....................................................................................................................................8<br />
Chart 1-2 Economic active population in Georgia and Tbilisi ..........................................................................................................................9<br />
Chart 1-3 Employment in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2004...............................................................................................................................11<br />
Chart 1-4 Structure type of activity in Tbilisi in 2004.......................................................................................................................................12<br />
Chart 1-5 Turnover in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2005.....................................................................................................13<br />
Chart 1-6 Turnover in business sector / Employed in 2001 - 2004..................................................................................................................14<br />
Chart 1-7 Earnings in business sector in 2001 – 2005 in Georgia and Tbilisi ............................................................................................15<br />
Chart 1-8 Volume of turnover per employee in business sector....................................................................................................................16<br />
Chart 1-9 Comparative analysis of turnover and employment in business sector ......................................................................................16<br />
Chart 1-10 Comparative analysis of employment and earnings in business sector....................................................................................17<br />
Chart 1-11 Comparative analysis of turnover per employee and earnings in business sector.................................................................17<br />
Chart 2-1 City of Kutaisi SWOT analysis .........................................................................................................................................................22<br />
Chart 2-2 City of Rustavi SWOT analysis........................................................................................................................................................22<br />
Chart 2-3 City of Batumi SWOT analysis.........................................................................................................................................................23<br />
Chart 2-4 City of Tbilisi SWOT analysis............................................................................................................................................................24<br />
Chart 2-5 City of Tbilisi in the region SWOT analysis.........................................................................................................................................27<br />
3
TABLES<br />
Table 1-1 Population in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2006....................................................................................................................................7<br />
Table 1-2 Dynamics in population.........................................................................................................................................................................8<br />
Table 1-3 Economic active population 2001 - 2005...........................................................................................................................................9<br />
Table 1-4 Economic active population / total population 2001 - 2005..............................................................................................................9<br />
Table 1-5 Dynamics in economic active population.........................................................................................................................................10<br />
Table 1-6 Employment in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2004..............................................................................................................................10<br />
Table 1-7 Dynamics in employment in Georgia and Tbilisi...........................................................................................................................11<br />
Table 1-8 Structure of employment In Tbilisi 2004-2005 ...............................................................................................................................12<br />
Table 1-9 Turnover in business sector 2001-2005..............................................................................................................................................13<br />
Table 1-10 Changes of business turnover in Georgia and Tbilisi..................................................................................................................13<br />
Table 1-11 Turnover in business sector / Employed in 2001 - 2004................................................................................................................14<br />
Table 1-12 Earnings in business sector in 2001 - 2005..................................................................................................................................14<br />
Table 1-13 Dynamics in earnings.......................................................................................................................................................................15<br />
Table 2-1 City of Tbilisi in the country, assessment results ..............................................................................................................................21<br />
Table 3-1 City of Tbilisi products evaluation ......................................................................................................................................................30<br />
Table 3-2 Financial cluster assessment of attractiveness...............................................................................................................................32<br />
Table 3-3 Education cluster assessment of attractiveness..............................................................................................................................33<br />
Table 3-4 Real estate cluster assessment of attractiveness..........................................................................................................................34<br />
Table 3-5 Transportation cluster assessment of attractiveness ......................................................................................................................35<br />
Table 3-6 Industry cluster assessment of attractiveness................................................................................................................................36<br />
Table 3-7 Creative cluster assessment of attractiveness.................................................................................................................................37<br />
Table 3-8 Touristic cluster assessment of attractiveness ................................................................................................................................38<br />
4
Report<br />
City of Tbilisi Competitiveness<br />
Assessment<br />
1. Role of cities in regional and national economy<br />
1.1. Cities take more important role in national economy<br />
City are the more and more powerful engines of the national and global economy. Two<br />
key forces - the globalization and the commercialization of new information as well as<br />
communications technologies - have been driving the massive changes and thus<br />
restructuring cities. Globalization is linked to liberalized trade and the opening up of world<br />
markets through organizations and agreements such as the Word Trade Organization or<br />
the European Union. Global corporations continue to expand their role on the world stage<br />
through expansion, mergers and acquisitions.<br />
Globalization would not be possible if there had not been for the explosion of new<br />
information technologies with mobile wireless communication, personal computers, and<br />
networks of internet, intranet and extranet. All of these have made it possible to manage<br />
facilities distributed around the world, for the labour to move more freely across national<br />
boundaries, and for the information, currencies and transactions to flow smoothly to any<br />
destination. As globalization proceeds, regional and national economies become more<br />
closely intertwined. National boundaries have gradually become less relevant as<br />
globalization and information technology have reduced the role of the nation state. Big<br />
metropolises with skilled workforce, globally connected businesses have emerged as the<br />
engines of the new economy.<br />
Globalization, and intensive competition which is integral to it, has led to a massive<br />
restructuring of regional economies. The widespread de-industrialization of cities,<br />
particularly of urban cores, is clear evidence of this. As the global marketplace expands,<br />
each city is forced to focus upon the few things that it is very good at, in which it can<br />
successfully compete at a global scale.<br />
This more recent phase of economic restructuring has been characterized by a<br />
transformation to a knowledge economy. The future quality of life in advanced economies<br />
depends on upgrading and moving the economy towards a concentration in high value<br />
added activities from any industry. The key is to focus on the high order, innovation<br />
based, high productivity activities in each industry. The quality of life and economic<br />
development, depend on making a successful transition to a knowledge economy.<br />
Unlike an economy based on traditional manufacturing and natural resource extraction, in<br />
which factors such as access to raw materials may have played a central role, the<br />
knowledge economy is driven by:<br />
• well educated and high-skilled workforce,<br />
• innovation – creativity, flexibility, research and development,<br />
• entrepreneurship – mentoring, networking, strategic alliances,<br />
• information and communications technology (ICT).<br />
5
The knowledge economy is present in all segments of our society and our economy. It is<br />
not confined to certain groups, such as university graduates, or certain industries, such as<br />
information technology or telecommunications. Rather, the knowledge economy<br />
represents a way of life and a way of producing goods and services that focus on<br />
continuous improvement of the above characteristics. Even “traditional” industries, can<br />
be, or rather should be, a part of the knowledge-based economy. Today successful<br />
companies in older industries employ high quality design and flexible advanced<br />
manufacturing.<br />
Cities have always been areas of growth, the places where economic resources,<br />
entrepreneurship, and a diverse population provided natural opportunity for starting new<br />
economic, cultural and intellectual activities. Cities have always fostered the creativity that<br />
produces technological advancements and new forms of commercial organizations.<br />
There are a lot of good examples in the last century of the power of cities to create new<br />
technological and commercial innovations, as a result of combined activities of<br />
entrepreneurs, artists and technicians congregated in these places. What we are<br />
witnessing now in successful North American and European cities is the concurrence of<br />
cultural and technological creativity that drive the new economy. The multi-media<br />
industries that have exploded in several places are example of this creative convergence.<br />
There is an assortment of specific conditions that exist in cities and which make them a<br />
fertile ground for innovation, creativity, and technological and commercial advancement.<br />
The most important thing that cities can offer is the diverse pool of skilled labour required<br />
to make large-scale and specialized production possible. Secondly, because of their size<br />
cities should offer local markets of sufficient size for specialized goods and services to be<br />
developed. Thirdly, because of their geographical conditions and the enhanced possibility<br />
for formal and informal contacts of all kinds, cities are places where technology and knowhow<br />
can spill over. Information flows easily, and chance encounters can bring together<br />
diverse interests and expertise to create new products and services.<br />
In this context, urban arts and cultural amenities - including not only formal events and<br />
places such as galleries, music halls or museums, but also the vitality of its more informal<br />
amenities like restaurants, street cafés, bookstores and outdoor festivals - becomes<br />
tangible assets that play a role in fostering creativity and innovation.<br />
Cities combine diversity – of population and resources of all kinds. Unique assets show<br />
the innovative capacity and the bunch of possibilities of each city. Under today’s<br />
economic conditions, in the global knowledge economy that is driven by information,<br />
creativity, innovation and technology, when cities are at centre stage, these special urban<br />
characteristic are of the biggest importance.<br />
The elimination, and in some places even the reduction, of national trade barriers has<br />
brought us to the moment when either people or businesses are choosing to locate and<br />
expand in cities that have the mix of economic, social, political and other attributes for<br />
long term success. As a result of urban renaissance we are witnessing the rapid growth of<br />
many North American and European cities. Urban-based industries are the fast-growth<br />
industries, people are moving back to cities and central governments are commencing<br />
massive urban regeneration schemes. It more and more widely recognized that cities are<br />
the focal points of national economies and should follow through with proactive urban<br />
regeneration strategies and investment funding.<br />
6
1.2. Tbilisi in Georgian economy<br />
On its way to becoming a regional center, Tbilisi’s relationships with the rest of the country<br />
should naturally be transformed. The role of cities as major actors on the world economy<br />
stage demands rethinking the whole approach to urban areas and their role in economic<br />
growth and improving quality of life. This rethinking is required not only within cities, but at<br />
the national level. City has not only the value of itself, but can mean even more in context<br />
of the whole region. The realities of a global economy dictate that all levels of government<br />
reevaluate their understanding of the role of cities, and their policies and approaches<br />
towards cities and towns. While each city is developing its own solutions, particular group<br />
of them should benefit from working together to develop and implement an integrated<br />
national, approach to advancing the economies of major urban centers.<br />
Funding and resources must now be directed toward supporting the transition to a<br />
knowledge economy, in the same way that the government supported the resource<br />
sector, and traditional manufacturing industries in the past. Central government<br />
representatives need to take into account the likely impacts of their policy and program<br />
decisions on urban economies. The emerging role of cities has been recognized round<br />
the world and is being exploited as a engines of national economic growth. A wide range<br />
of innovative initiatives and institutions are being put in place to more effectively respond<br />
to the changing context for cities.<br />
Population<br />
Table 1-1 Population in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2006<br />
Population (thds people)<br />
Georgia - total Tbilisi Tbilisi share %<br />
2001 4401.4 1089.7 24.8<br />
2002 4371.5 1081.7 24.7<br />
2003 4342.6 1083.5 25.0<br />
2004 4315.2 1086.4 25.2<br />
2005 4321.5 1092.6 25.3<br />
2006 4401.3 1103.3 25.1<br />
7
Chart 1-1 Population in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2006<br />
5000<br />
Population in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
Georgia population<br />
Tbilisi population<br />
4500<br />
4401,40 4371,50 4342,60<br />
4315,20 4321,50<br />
4401,30<br />
4000<br />
3500<br />
Population in thds<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
1089,70 1081,70 1083,50 1086,40 1092,60 1103,30<br />
500<br />
0<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
YEARS<br />
Table 1-2 Dynamics in population<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Dynamics<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2002-2001 99.3 99.3<br />
2003-2002 99.3 100.2<br />
2004-2003 99.4 100.3<br />
2005-2004 100.1 100.6<br />
2006-2005 101.8 101.0<br />
Dynamics 2001-2006<br />
Georgia- total 100.00<br />
Tbilisi 101.25<br />
While the Georgia population is stable Tbilisi slowly grows and now constitutes the one<br />
quarter of the national population.<br />
8
Economic active population<br />
Table 1-3 Economic active population 2001 - 2005<br />
Economic active population (thds people)<br />
Georgia- total Tbilisi Tbilisi share %<br />
2001 2113.3 434.5 20.6<br />
2002 2104.2 448.5 21.3<br />
2003 2050.8 429 20.9<br />
2004 2041 426.9 20.9<br />
2005 2023.9 429.8 21.2<br />
Table 1-4 Economic active population / total population 2001 - 2005<br />
Economic active population / Total population (%)<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2001 48.0 39.9<br />
2002 48.1 41.5<br />
2003 47.2 39.6<br />
2004 47.3 39.3<br />
2005 46.8 39.3<br />
Chart 1-2 Economic active population in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
2500<br />
2250<br />
2000<br />
Economic active population in Georgia and<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2113,30 2104,20<br />
2050,80 2041,00 2023,90<br />
Georgia -economic<br />
active population<br />
Tbilisi-economic<br />
active population<br />
Economic active population<br />
1750<br />
1500<br />
1250<br />
1000<br />
750<br />
500<br />
434,50 448,50 429,00 426,90 429,80<br />
250<br />
0<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
YEARS<br />
9
Table 1-5 Dynamics in economic active population<br />
Dynamics<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2002-2001 99.6 103.2<br />
2003-2002 97.5 95.7<br />
2004-2003 99.5 99.5<br />
2005-2004 99.2 100.7<br />
Changes 2001-2005<br />
Georgia- total 95.8<br />
Tbilisi 98.9<br />
While we can observe the decreasing number of economically active population in<br />
Georgia and Tbilisi during this period, the capital has improved its situation in the last<br />
years and its share in national economically active population has increased. It visible<br />
that the share of economically active population in whole community is still much smaller<br />
in Tbilisi than in the rest of the country.<br />
Employment<br />
Table 1-6 Employment in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2004<br />
Employment ( thds people)<br />
Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />
2001 708.7 323.8 45.7<br />
2002 681.7 319.5 46.9<br />
2003 723.8 317 43.8<br />
2004 722.4 315.8 43.7<br />
10
Chart 1-3 Employment in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2004<br />
Employment in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Table 1-7 Dynamics in employment in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Dynamics<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2002-2001 96.2 98.7<br />
2003-2002 106.2 99.2<br />
2004-2003 99.8 99.6<br />
Dynamics 2001-2004<br />
Georgia- total 101.9<br />
Tbilisi 97.5<br />
11
Chart 1-4 Structure type of activity in Tbilisi in 2004<br />
Structure type of activity in Tbilisi in 2004<br />
6%<br />
2%<br />
1%<br />
2%<br />
0%<br />
5%<br />
11%<br />
2%<br />
21%<br />
24%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
2%<br />
7%<br />
2%<br />
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing<br />
Manufacturing<br />
Construction<br />
Hotels and Restaurants<br />
Financial intermediation<br />
Public administration & defense<br />
Other community, social and personal services activities<br />
Exterritorial organization<br />
Mining<br />
Electricity, gas, w ater supply<br />
Trade and Utilities<br />
Transport and storage, communications<br />
Real estate renting, business activities<br />
Education, Health, social services<br />
Private house economy w ith hired employment<br />
Table 1-8 Structure of employment In Tbilisi 2004-2005<br />
Structure of employment In Tbilisi 2004 2005<br />
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 6.8 3.1<br />
Mining 0.6 0.5<br />
Manufacturing 33.9 39<br />
Electricity, gas, water supply 7.6 7.9<br />
Constructions 15.4 11.6<br />
Trade and Utilities 71.1 64.4<br />
Hotels and Restaurants 7.7 6.6<br />
Transport and storage, communications 21.2 21.9<br />
Financial intermediation 5.2 6.1<br />
Real estate renting, business activities 16.7 15.2<br />
Public administration & defense 32.5 29.1<br />
Education, Health, social services 67.6 69.1<br />
Other community, social and personal services<br />
activities 19.9 19.7<br />
Private house economy with hired employment 6.5 8.4<br />
Exterritorial organizations 2.9 2.5<br />
Total 315.6 305.1<br />
While the trade and utilities employ the most of workforce, their share decries. Industrial<br />
companies after are slowly improving the crisis. The reforms reduced the public<br />
administration share in the job market.<br />
12
Turnover In business sector<br />
Table 1-9 Turnover in business sector 2001-2005<br />
Turnover in business sector in mln GEL<br />
Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />
2001 3975.2 2133.5 53.7<br />
2002 4595.6 2739.7 59.6<br />
2003 5523 3330 60.3<br />
2004 7248.4 4455.7 61.5<br />
2005 10076.3 6352.8 63.0<br />
Chart 1-5 Turnover in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi 2001-2005<br />
Turnover in business Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
12000<br />
10000<br />
8000<br />
6000<br />
4000<br />
2000<br />
0<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Table 1-10 Changes of business turnover in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
Changes of business turnover (%)<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2002-2001 115.6 128.4<br />
2003-2002 120.2 121.5<br />
2004-2003 131.2 133.8<br />
2005-2004 139.0 142.6<br />
The indicators show how strong economic position of Tbilisi is in the country. Tbilisi<br />
economic share is much higher than its population’s share and the higher economic<br />
growth strengthens Tbilisi’s future position.<br />
13
Turnover and employment<br />
Table 1-11 Turnover in business sector / Employed in 2001 - 2004<br />
Turnover in business sector / Employed<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2001 5.6 6.6<br />
2002 6.7 8.6<br />
2003 7.6 10.5<br />
2004 10.0 14.1<br />
Chart 1-6 Turnover in business sector / Employed in 2001 - 2004<br />
Turnover in business sector / Employed Georgia and<br />
Tbilisi<br />
16,0<br />
14,0<br />
12,0<br />
10,0<br />
8,0<br />
6,0<br />
4,0<br />
2,0<br />
0,0<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Earnings<br />
Table 1-12 Earnings in business sector in 2001 - 2005<br />
Earnings in business sector ( in GEL/ month)<br />
Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />
2001 108.4 128.6 118.6<br />
2002 119.9 132.4 110.4<br />
2003 139.4 154.8 111.0<br />
2004 161.6 184.9 114.4<br />
2005 204.5 229.4 112.2<br />
14
Chart 1-7 Earnings in business sector in 2001 – 2005 in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
Earnings in business sector Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Table 1-13 Dynamics in earnings<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Dynamics<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2002-2001 110.6 103.0<br />
2003-2002 116.3 116.9<br />
2004-2003 115.9 119.4<br />
2005-2004 126.5 124.1<br />
Dynamics 2001-2005<br />
Georgia- total 188.7<br />
Tbilisi 178.4<br />
The indicators show how strong the economic position of Tbilisi is in the country. Tbilisi<br />
economic share is much higher than its population’s share and the higher economic<br />
growth strengthens Tbilisi’s future position. The turnover per employee rate shows how<br />
much more effective Tbilisi companies are. As a result wages are also higher in Tbilisi<br />
than in the whole country.<br />
15
Chart 1-8 Volume of turnover per employee in business sector<br />
2005<br />
Volume of turnover per employee in business<br />
sector in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
25906,70<br />
33616,30<br />
Georgia<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2004<br />
22456,20<br />
29907,20<br />
YEARS<br />
2003<br />
18546,30<br />
23504,70<br />
2002<br />
15252,10<br />
19084,50<br />
2001<br />
15188,50<br />
12685,30<br />
0 10000 20000 30000 40000<br />
Volume in GEL<br />
Chart 1-9 Comparative analysis of turnover and employment in business sector<br />
10 000<br />
Comparative analysis business sector<br />
turnover and employment in Georgia and<br />
Tbilisi ( X-employment, Y-turnover GEL mln)<br />
2005<br />
Georgia_turnover<br />
Georgia_employed<br />
Tbilisi_turnover<br />
Tbilisi_employed<br />
8 000<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
6 000<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2002<br />
4 000<br />
2001<br />
2003<br />
2002<br />
2 000<br />
2001<br />
100 000 150 000 200 000 250 000 300 000 350 000 400 000<br />
16
Chart 1-10 Comparative analysis of employment and earnings in business sector<br />
240<br />
220<br />
Comparative analisis business sector employment<br />
and earnings in Georgia and Tbilisi (X-employment,<br />
Y-earnings in GEL)<br />
2005<br />
Georgia_employed<br />
Georgia_earnings<br />
Tbilisi_employed<br />
Tbilisi_earnings<br />
200<br />
2005<br />
180<br />
2004<br />
160<br />
2004<br />
2003<br />
140<br />
120<br />
2002<br />
2001<br />
2003<br />
2002<br />
100<br />
2001<br />
100 000 150 000 200 000 250 000 300 000 350 000 400 000<br />
Chart 1-11 Comparative analysis of turnover per employee and earnings in business sector<br />
35 000<br />
Comparative analisis business sector<br />
turnover per employee and earnings in<br />
Georgia and Tbilisi (X-earnings,Y-turnover<br />
per employee in GEL)<br />
2005<br />
Georgia_turnover_<br />
peremployed<br />
Tbilisi_earnings<br />
Tbilisi_turnover_pe<br />
Tbilisi_earnings<br />
30 000<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
25 000<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
20 000<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
15 000<br />
2001 2002<br />
2001<br />
10 000<br />
120 140 160 180 200 220 240<br />
17
2. City competitiveness<br />
2.1. Factors of city competitiveness<br />
City competitiveness can be defined as the ability to attract and retain citizens, investment<br />
and good quality work places as well as visitors. It is no less important to support city<br />
economy in such a way that city products keep strong position on international markets.<br />
As we continue to move towards a global knowledge economy, the competitive playing<br />
field has shifted dramatically. City-regions are now competing with one another:<br />
• to attract skilled labour;<br />
• to attract new investment and quality jobs;<br />
• for their share of global markets in the city’s export cluster.<br />
In a global knowledge economy, skilled labour, investment and jobs are increasingly<br />
mobile. They can move relatively easily across national boundaries, and between cities.<br />
Products and services compete globally. Sales of these products and services can<br />
generate added value, income, investment and jobs in the region in which they are<br />
produced. It means that cities should build on their strengths. Notably, they can create<br />
partnerships and employment and innovation pacts, bringing together key players within<br />
an area – elected representatives, business leaders, NGOs, interest groups and<br />
universities – to engage in positive and dynamic social and economic development.<br />
Cities should tackle their weaknesses, boosting employability among those groups within<br />
the population which find it hardest to access employment. In some cases, cities compete<br />
directly with other cities for market share, as in the tourism industry, where the character,<br />
attractions and events compete directly to attract tourists and their money. In other cases,<br />
the role of cities in supporting the competitiveness of their exports is more indirect.<br />
As globalization proceeds, cities continue to take centre stage in the global economic<br />
theatre. The relationship between cities is primarily one of intense competition. Ultimately,<br />
a sustained or improved quality of life in particular metropolises depends upon its ability to<br />
compete successfully with other cities and to provide the necessary economic<br />
foundations for growth. Competitive businesses and industries create jobs for residents<br />
and labour force, and assessment revenue for the city that allows it to provide a range of<br />
social, community, physical and other services and programs.<br />
Cities often naturally provide a stimulating environment for innovation and businesses to<br />
flourish and there are steps they can take to further foster this environment. The added<br />
value of city-level actions is that they have more information on the specificities of the<br />
business environment and are able to carry out smaller scale complex actions tackling<br />
multiple interlinked problems. Those are factors that allow cities to successfully compete<br />
with each other.<br />
18
Different factors influence the city competitiveness. The most important ones are listed<br />
below:<br />
• Demographic structure.<br />
• Skilled workforce.<br />
• Quality of life.<br />
• Social diversity.<br />
• City recognition.<br />
• City recognition and reputation.<br />
• Costs of doing business.<br />
• Economic structure.<br />
• Financing.<br />
• Networking.<br />
• Research and development.<br />
• Institutional infrastructure.<br />
• Legal regulations and policies.<br />
• Transport and telecommunication accessibility.<br />
• Technical infrastructure.<br />
Demographic structure - when planning long-term involvement in economic<br />
development the demographic trends such as migration rate, income distribution or age<br />
structure cannot be omitted since they influence the availability of workforce, the<br />
consumers’ buying potential and local business environment.<br />
Skilled workforce -intellectual capital, ingenuity, creativity and technical capabilities<br />
of the labour force are key drivers of economic growth nowadays. This is why the<br />
availability of qualified workforce is a crucial factor when analyzing city competitiveness.<br />
Quality of life - to attract and retain top specialists needed for the city’s economy to<br />
develop, a region needs to provide them with satisfying conditions of living. Safe and<br />
healthy physical environment, diversified opportunities for leisure, rich urban culture,<br />
chances of professional and personal growth are among the main factors influencing<br />
individuals’ decisions regarding their choice of a place of stay.<br />
Social diversity - wealth and poverty distribution, social exclusion phenomena,<br />
community’s social capital are important factors to be taken into consideration when<br />
choosing industries to focus on.<br />
City recognition - being easily recognized in a region and worldwide as a city with<br />
certain industries developed can facilitate the process of attracting international<br />
investments, gaining business partners and entering new markets.<br />
Economic structure - among the key factors influencing the likeliness of business to<br />
succeed are its economic surroundings. This factor includes industrial profile of the<br />
region, developed economy sectors, the quality and extent of supply chains, the<br />
competitiveness of local companies, etc.<br />
Costs of doing business - costs related to companies’ activities are often decisive<br />
when choosing a region for opening a new branch or founding a new company. These<br />
include state and municipal tax levels, land and resources prices, office rents, wages and<br />
so on.<br />
Financing business – such initiatives as expansion to new markets or founding new<br />
companies very often involve finding external financial support. The availability of various<br />
institutions providing local firms with support on different levels, from small credits to joint<br />
venture capitals, influences the chances of product development.<br />
19
Networking - the strength of inter-firm and public-private relationships between<br />
companies, institutions and a government within the region and beyond. High networking<br />
level can seriously boost economic activity within the region, fostering innovation and<br />
enabling the establishment of strategic alliances. Networking can take place both on<br />
informal (random encounters) and formal (conferences, industry associations meetings)<br />
basis.<br />
Institutional infrastructure - the existence and quality of services of various<br />
institutions supporting business, such as research centers, health, education and<br />
community services, companies dealing with finance, legal issues, marketing or<br />
transportation are crucial for business climate in the region.<br />
Legal regulations and policies - policies and programs supporting this kind of<br />
activity and quality of services that public administration provides to the market. These<br />
may include anti-trust law, regulations regarding conditions of entering the market, local<br />
officials willingness to support the branch and such.<br />
Transport and telecommunication accessibility - collecting information and being<br />
able to act fast are becoming increasingly important elements in gaining competitive<br />
advantage. That is why companies are interested in the availability of transportation<br />
channels such as roads, airports, railways, along with telecommunication services –<br />
internet, mobile telephony and such.<br />
Technical infrastructure - the availability of space for doing business (from small<br />
offices for the start-ups and SMEs to greenfield investment land for multinationals),<br />
electricity supply and the presence of basic urban infrastructure such as piped services<br />
(water, sewers) are among the basic elements necessary for businesses to develop.<br />
2.2. Assessment of Tbilisi competitiveness<br />
The competitiveness of Tbilisi was assessed in two aspects:<br />
• its competitiveness in relation to other Georgian cities,<br />
• its competitiveness in relation to other cities in the region of Caucasus and central<br />
Asia.<br />
The assessments were carried out by means of the SWOT method, which is usually<br />
applied by the SRGG when evaluating the competitiveness of cities.<br />
Tbilisi in the country<br />
In order to assess the economic situation of Georgian cities during the workshop session<br />
of the City Team the guests from other Georgian cities evaluated current economic<br />
changes in their environment. They took into consideration the condition of both traditional<br />
and emerging economic sectors, demographic changes and the workforce educational<br />
improvement, the level of technical and urban infrastructure.<br />
The assessments were performed with Tbilisi city team and the guests from Rustavi,<br />
Batumi and Kutaisi<br />
20
The assessment results are presented in the table below.<br />
Table 2-1 City of Tbilisi in the country, assessment results<br />
Demography<br />
Kutaisi Tbilisi. Rustawi Batumi Gori<br />
• population 0 + 0 + -<br />
• natural birth rate + + + + - -<br />
• age structure - - - - - - -<br />
• migrations - - + - 0 -<br />
• suburbanisation 0 +- - - 0<br />
Economy<br />
• traditional economy - - - - + +<br />
• new sectors + ++ + + 0<br />
• institutional infrastructure + ++ + ++ ++<br />
• new city products + ++ + + +<br />
Education<br />
• school education + +++ + ++ ++<br />
• business supply + +++ 0 + +<br />
• vocational trainings 0 +++ 0 + +<br />
Financing resources<br />
• local government ++ +++ ++ ++ ++<br />
• business + + + ++ ++<br />
• citizens + + + + +<br />
Local government<br />
• cooperation with Central ++ +++ + ++ ++<br />
Government<br />
• cooperation with neighbor 0 ++ + + 0<br />
municipalities<br />
• cooperation with citizens ++ ++ + + +<br />
• cooperation with business + +++ + ++ ++<br />
Explanation:<br />
+++ increase more than 75%<br />
++ increase more than 25% less 75%<br />
+ increase more than 25% less 1%<br />
--- decrease more than 1% less 25%<br />
-- decrease more than 25% less 75%<br />
- decrease more than 75%<br />
The results show that all the cities are changing dynamically and their situation is<br />
improving.<br />
In the second phase the city teams carried out the SWOT competitive assessment of their<br />
cities in relation to other Georgian cities.<br />
21
City of Kutaisi<br />
Chart 2-1 City of Kutaisi SWOT analysis<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
2 Business<br />
organizations<br />
6 Reputation<br />
of the City<br />
3 Education system<br />
4 Infrastructure<br />
Weakness<br />
es<br />
1 Workforce<br />
Strengths<br />
5 Quality of life<br />
THREATS<br />
City of Rustavi<br />
Chart 2-2 City of Rustavi SWOT analysis<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
4 Infrastructure<br />
5 Quality of life<br />
1 Workforce<br />
6 Reputation<br />
of the City<br />
Weaknesses<br />
2 Business<br />
organizations<br />
Strengths<br />
3 Education system<br />
THREATS<br />
22
City of Batumi<br />
Chart 2-3 City of Batumi SWOT analysis<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
2 Business<br />
organization<br />
s<br />
1 Workforce<br />
4 Infrastructure<br />
6 Reputation<br />
of the City<br />
Weaknesse<br />
s<br />
3 Education system<br />
Strengths<br />
5 Quality of life<br />
THREATS<br />
The SWOT competitive assessment is based on positioning the key factors of city<br />
competitiveness in a coordinate system. The X axis allows to evaluate factors such as<br />
strong and weak points of the city. The Y axis positions the same factor vertically and<br />
demonstrates the opportunities and threats it will bring in the future. The results of the<br />
SWOT competitive assessment for Batumi, Rustavi, Kutaisi and Tbilisi are presented<br />
below. Finally, Tbilisi team evaluated a complete list of competitiveness factors in their city<br />
in comparison to other cities.<br />
23
Chart 2-4 City of Tbilisi SWOT analysis<br />
CITY OF <strong>TBILISI</strong><br />
IN GEORGIA<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
city<br />
recognition<br />
technical<br />
infrastructure<br />
institutional<br />
infrastructure<br />
economic<br />
structure<br />
transport and telecommunication<br />
accessibility<br />
financing<br />
skilled<br />
workforce<br />
demographic<br />
structure<br />
R&D<br />
legal regulation and policy<br />
quality of life<br />
WEAKNESSES<br />
STRENGTHS<br />
networking<br />
cost of doing business<br />
social<br />
diversity<br />
THREATS<br />
24
While assessing Tbilisi competitiveness in relation to other Georgian cities the teams<br />
identified as its weak points the research and development, traditional structure of<br />
economy, the costs of doing business and starting joint ventures. Also, the technical<br />
infrastructure and the access to financial resources need to be strengthened. The areas<br />
that are the most likely to develop are technical infrastructure and the structure of local<br />
economy.<br />
R&D is likely to improve slightly, while growing costs of doing business is the most<br />
significant threat.<br />
The strongest points are the city recognition and its demographic structure. The good<br />
opportunities of growth have been observed in the areas that have been evaluated as<br />
poorly developed, i.e. in the institutional infrastructure, skilled workforce, transport and<br />
telecommunication accessibility.<br />
Unfortunately, the quality of life is less likely to improve and the risk of social exclusion is<br />
regarded as the most significant threat.<br />
All in all, the following conclusions have been drawn:<br />
• the economic situation in Tbilisi and other Georgian cities is improving,<br />
• further efforts are necessary to improve technical infrastructure that directly<br />
determines the competitiveness of local economy and the growth of local<br />
business,<br />
• in order to achieve the long-term growth capacity it is crucial for the city to improve<br />
local business environment and institutional infrastructure, upgrade workforce<br />
skills and facilitate the availability of investment funds.<br />
Tbilisi in the region<br />
After the collapse of the Soviet Union Georgia is regaining its traditional role in the region.<br />
The country is situated along the transport links connecting Asia with Europe and Tbilisi<br />
plays the role of service centre influencing Caucasus and the neighbouring regions. In the<br />
regional exchange Tbilisi tries to become the central point of:<br />
• economic life with advanced services where the most competitive business of the<br />
region operate from,<br />
• political life with the head offices of international organisations and donor<br />
organisations operating in the region,<br />
• education and research that attract young people from the whole region,<br />
• culture and sport with the most important sports and cultural events in the region,<br />
• tourist industry with the largest number of visitors.<br />
25
The list of Tbilisi competitors in the region includes the cities of Ukraine, Turkey, Russia,<br />
Azerbaijan, Armenia and the countries of central Asia that aspire to the position of the<br />
regional service centre.<br />
Due to the political situation there are no cooperation links in the region and, therefore,<br />
Tbilisi has no competition in Northern Caucasus as well as in the neighbouring parts of<br />
Russia. Moreover, none of the Ukrainian cities attempts to play an active role in<br />
Caucasus so there is no alternative for Tbilisi.<br />
Despite dynamic economic exchange with Turkey, in its eastern part there are no strong<br />
urban centres that could be able to compete with Tbilisi.<br />
That leaves us with Baku and Erevan, the capital cities of Azerbaijan and Armenia as<br />
Tbilisi’s natural and historical rivals. In Central Asia it is Kazakhstan with its strong<br />
political and economic position that boasts the role of a regional leader. Its authorities,<br />
businesses and organisations are very active and have achieved the position of an<br />
important economic partner as well as the key investors in the region.<br />
Kazakh cities, mainly Astana and Alma-Ata, are likely to become regional centres that<br />
influence neighbouring countries and attract investors, events and people. Numerous<br />
investments in Astana and the plans of further local development make the city a regional<br />
leader. Also, the historical, institutional and demographic potential of Alma-Ata positions<br />
this city as another significant competition in the region. The political, social and economic<br />
situation in other countries of Central Asia results in the limited potential of other cities in<br />
the region, so they cannot threaten the leading position of Tbilisi. Therefore, the cities<br />
eventually included in the comparative analysis were Astana, Alma-Ata, Baku and<br />
Erevan.<br />
The City team and the consultants carried out the SWOT analysis of Tbilisi, relating its<br />
position in the region to Astana, Alma-Ata, Baku and Erevan.<br />
By means of the SWOT competitive assessment in the system of coordinates the X axis<br />
(horizontal) the strengths and opportunities of Tbilisi were placed. Taking into<br />
consideration the time factor and analysing the prospective changes that are likely to<br />
happen in Tbilisi and in its rival cities the areas of threats and opportunities were placed<br />
on the Y axis (vertical).<br />
26
Chart 2-5 City of Tbilisi in the region SWOT analysis<br />
<strong>TBILISI</strong> in the<br />
region<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
cost of doing<br />
business<br />
quality of<br />
life<br />
transport and<br />
telecommunication<br />
accessibility<br />
institutional infrastructure<br />
legal regulation a<br />
skilled workforce<br />
financing<br />
technical infrastructure<br />
economic structure<br />
demographic<br />
structure<br />
city recognition<br />
WEAKNESSES<br />
STRENGTHS<br />
networking<br />
social<br />
diversity<br />
R&D<br />
THREATS<br />
27
While assessing the present condition of the elementary city competitiveness factors with<br />
a view to its weak and strong points the team pointed out a particularly weak position of<br />
the Research and development sector and the highly unattractive traditional structure of<br />
local economy. The team found that the capacity to start cooperation links and networking<br />
as well as the accessibility of funds are slightly more satisfying but still poor. Also, the<br />
qualifications of workforce, technical and institutional infrastructure, transport accessibility,<br />
social diversity and the quality of life need to be improved.<br />
In most cases the prospects of improvement were observed. The best opportunities are<br />
likely to be observed in the quality of life and the transport and telecommunications<br />
accessibility. The areas facing the most significant threats are R&D, networking and the<br />
groups threatened by social exclusion of those who do not participate in economic and<br />
life.<br />
The demographic situation was assessed on a medium level. As for strong points of the<br />
city, legal regulations, state policies and the city recognition were ranked the highest.<br />
Other strong points included the costs of doing business, which were most likely to<br />
improve, and the institutional infrastructure. Further reforms will make it possible to<br />
improve legal framework. Ambitious plans of other cities may threaten the recognition of<br />
Tbilisi as the regional centre.<br />
In conclusion, it was pointed out that public intervention is necessary to support the<br />
development of R&D, networking, the city recognition, workforce skills, availability of<br />
financial resources and technical infrastructure. With regard to the technical infrastructure<br />
it seems necessary to expand space for business activities, i.e. to developed land for<br />
industrial, logistic and office activities with full infrastructure for services. Special attention<br />
was paid to meeting the requirements of start-ups, mainly to regulations that make<br />
establishing a business cheaper and less time-consuming.<br />
28
3. Identification of competitive advantages of Tbilisi economy<br />
3.1. Identification of city products<br />
The first part of the assessment includes a list of products, services and goods<br />
offered by companies and institutions in Tbilisi. In order to estimate their attractiveness the<br />
following criteria have been chosen that are the most significant in the present situation of<br />
Tbilisi:<br />
• Market growth potential<br />
• Product growth potential<br />
• Job creation potential<br />
• Tbilisi specific advantages.<br />
While selecting these criteria we mainly focused on:<br />
Market growth potential: The likeliness of the market to grow has the impact on future<br />
opportunities for product development, geographical expansion and securing sufficient<br />
income to make the industry self-sustainable. Investments in rising markets are promising in<br />
terms of future growth of employment rates and of the number of developing companies<br />
cooperating with the industry.<br />
Product growth potential: Growth potential is one of the most critical factors in product<br />
analysis since high-growth industries tend to yield higher profits, more workplaces and higher<br />
wages. This is why it should be carefully analyzed, taking into particular consideration its<br />
future perspectives, crucial resources and international market assessment.<br />
Job creation potential: Market’s capability of creating high levels of employment in<br />
short to medium term.<br />
Tbilisi specific advantages: Tbilisi’s competitive advantages allowing the product<br />
market to develop and contribute back to the city’s growth.<br />
Over twenty products were evaluated. The final opinion was based on the number of<br />
points assigned to an individual product. The products that were least attractive according to<br />
a given criterion received zero points, medium attractiveness was rewarded with one point<br />
and the high one – with two points.<br />
29
Table 3-1 City of Tbilisi products evaluation<br />
Product<br />
market<br />
growth<br />
potential<br />
product<br />
growth<br />
potential<br />
job<br />
creation<br />
potential<br />
Tbilisi<br />
unique<br />
adventage<br />
Score<br />
Primary and secondary education 1 1 1 1 4<br />
Higher education 1 1 1 2 5<br />
Vocational trainings 1 1 1 0 3<br />
Hospital and health care services 0 0 1 1 2<br />
Public administration 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Social services 1 1 1 0 3<br />
Finacial services 1 1 1 1 4<br />
Advisory and consulting 2 1 1 1 5<br />
IT services 2 2 2 1 7<br />
Media products and services 2 2 1 1 6<br />
Design services 1 1 1 1 4<br />
Telecomunication services 2 2 2 1 7<br />
transportation and logistic 2 2 2 1 7<br />
Retail trade 2 2 1 1 6<br />
Wholesale trade 1 1 1 1 4<br />
Storage and confection 1 1 1 1 4<br />
Constructions 2 2 1 1 6<br />
Industrial products 0<br />
Mashinery and equipment 1 1 1 0 3<br />
Cosmetics and pharmaceutics 2 1 1 0 4<br />
Oil products 0 1 1 0 2<br />
Textail, aparel and cloths 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Aviation products 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Timber products 1 1 0 0 2<br />
Building materials 1 1 1 0 3<br />
Conferences and trainings 2 2 2 1 7<br />
Trade fairs and shows 1 1 1 1 4<br />
Historical monuments and city<br />
architecture 0 0 0 1 1<br />
Hotels, motels and private<br />
accommodation 1 1 2 1 5<br />
Restaurants and clubs 2 2 2 2 8<br />
Galleries, museums and theatres 1 1 1 2 5<br />
Georgian music and dances 1 1 1 2 5<br />
Cultural and sport events 1 1 1 2 5<br />
Recreational tourism 2 2 2 2 8<br />
Heritage tourism 2 2 2 2 8<br />
Business tourism 2 2 2 1 7<br />
Spa and wellness 2 2 1 0 5<br />
Space for offices 2 2 2 1 7<br />
Housing - flats, apartments and houses 2 2 2 1 7<br />
Industrial estate 1 1 2 1 5<br />
Georgian food 0 0 1 2 3<br />
Georgian vine 1 1 1 2 5<br />
Mineral waters 1 1 1 1 4<br />
30
On the basis of this assessment the results of potentially promising clusters for<br />
further evaluation were identified:<br />
• Creative cluster<br />
• Industrial cluster<br />
• Financial cluster<br />
• Education cluster<br />
• Transport and logistic cluster<br />
• Construction and real estate cluster<br />
• Tourism cluster.<br />
3.2. Identification of promising Tbilisi clusters<br />
Clusters has become a new tool for developing local and regional economic<br />
development strategies. City economies can grow around dynamic clusters which offer<br />
firms the best external spillovers and synergies. City representatives need a tool that<br />
would allow them to identify local promising clusters, that have growth potential, can<br />
generate new work places and can be competitive at international markets. Analysis is<br />
intended to help the city leaders to better allocate resources intended for city economic<br />
development by focusing investment in local business activity toward growing clusters<br />
and by convincing firms to locate in these clusters.<br />
The methodology that was utilized for the identification of promising industrial clusters in<br />
Tbilisi is based on the analysis of market attractiveness developed by McKinsey &<br />
Company to improve the allocation of corporate funds toward investments in new<br />
markets.<br />
An aim of McKinsey & Co’s analysis is to assess the attractiveness of a market using a<br />
multitude of indicators. In their opinion it better reflects the complexities of a sector and<br />
allow to understand that market attractiveness is a function of several various<br />
components. Indicators correspond to three major -categories that are descriptive of the<br />
market:<br />
• market potential;<br />
• market structure;<br />
• external environment.<br />
Several sub-categories fall under each of these three. The market potential is assessed<br />
by estimating the market size, market saturation, and the market growth rate. Market<br />
structure is composed of suppliers, buyers, substitute products, and intensity of rivalry.<br />
The external environment comprises of the general economic conditions, political<br />
situation, technology, and societal factors.<br />
Each sub-category is assessed using a set of quantitative or qualitative data using<br />
attractiveness ranges. To final evaluation they weigh each sub-category score by its<br />
relative percentage importance to market attractiveness. The weights to each subcategory<br />
score are subjective, depending on their relative importance, but when summed<br />
they must add to 100 percent. The weighted scores are then summed to give a final score<br />
of market attractiveness that ranges from a least attractive score to most attractive score.<br />
31
It is the advantage of this method that it:<br />
• can assess several different factors and gives one common denominator<br />
• is flexible and the assessed categories and subcategories can be changed<br />
• weights can always reflect local conditions and interest of stakeholders<br />
In addition, the methodology is flexible in that the categories can be changed depending<br />
on the characteristics of the evaluated markets. For instance, the weights can be changed<br />
to reflect the importance of different categories to various markets.<br />
The evaluation of the city products has made it possible to identify and assess local<br />
clusters. In the analytical process the following potential clusters have been identified:<br />
• Financial 1.1<br />
• Education 1.1<br />
• Real estate 1.2<br />
• Transport and logistics 1.2<br />
• Industry 0.7<br />
• Touristic 1.3<br />
• Small and medium enterprises 1.2<br />
The clusters have been assessed in three categories: of their market potential, market<br />
structure and environment.<br />
Financial cluster<br />
Table 3-2 Financial cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />
Indicators of Cluster<br />
Attractiveness<br />
Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />
low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />
Score<br />
I. Market Potential<br />
45% 0.6<br />
→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />
→ Output Growth X 10% 0.1<br />
→ Average Wages and<br />
employment X 20% 0.2<br />
II. Market Structure<br />
20% 0.25<br />
→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Substitute Products X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />
III. External Environment<br />
35% 0.25<br />
→Economic Conditions X 10% 0.1<br />
→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Technology X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Societal Factors X 15% 0<br />
IV. Total Score<br />
100% 1.1<br />
The financial cluster has a high market potential and a medium potential of products<br />
currently offered in Tbilisi. It also demonstrates a medium rate of the job market increase<br />
as well as a medium salary level. As for the market structure the financial cluster has an<br />
advantage of the lack of substitutes and of an easy access to new technological and<br />
organisational solutions. The environment means mainly the<br />
32
application of new technologies. The political situation in the country as well as its<br />
economic situation are moderately attractive. Social indices indicate low attractiveness for<br />
the cluster’s services, which probably results from the general economic situation of both<br />
local residents and businesses. The financial cluster has received a general mark of 1.1<br />
(the maximum mark is 2.0), which means that the cluster’s attractiveness and its growth<br />
perspectives slightly exceed the medium level. It should be noted, however, that the<br />
cluster is going to develop more dynamically when the local economy and the local<br />
residents’ economic situation grow.<br />
Education cluster<br />
Table 3-3 Education cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />
Indicators of Cluster<br />
Attractiveness<br />
Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />
low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />
Score<br />
I. Market Potential<br />
45% 0.5<br />
→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />
→ Output Growth X 10% 0.2<br />
→ Average Wages and<br />
employment X 20% 0<br />
II. Market Structure<br />
20% 0.3<br />
→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Substitute Products X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0.1<br />
III. External Environment<br />
35% 0.5<br />
→Economic Conditions X 10% 0.1<br />
→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Technology X 5% 0<br />
→ Societal Factors X 15% 0.3<br />
IV. Total Score<br />
100% 1.3<br />
The education cluster demonstrates high growth potential due to the increased demand<br />
for re-training services for adults and young people’s educational needs. Because of the<br />
economic conditions in which local educational organisations operate the existing<br />
education product has a medium growth potential. Over-supply of teachers as well as<br />
low salaries do not provide favourable conditions for higher benefits and more<br />
employment in the sector. The sector market structure and its environment are highly<br />
attractive due to many customers, the shortage of alternatives, the political situation and<br />
social expectations. Low marks concerning the cluster’s attractiveness result from the<br />
employment and salary growth parameters, insufficient use of new technologies as well<br />
as from low productivity. The constructed corporate city development plans should<br />
particularly focus on the education cluster. With its good didactic and training facilities, a<br />
market oriented offer and highly qualified stuff the cluster will obviously become one of the<br />
fastest growing segments of local market. Its potential will be even more important as a<br />
support to one of the main factors of the city competitiveness, i.e. the skilled workforce<br />
33
Real estate cluster.<br />
Table 3-4 Real estate cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />
Indicators of Cluster<br />
Attractiveness<br />
Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />
low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />
Score<br />
I. Market Potential<br />
45% 0.7<br />
→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />
→ Output Growth X 10% 0.2<br />
→ Average Wages and<br />
employment X 20% 0.2<br />
II. Market Structure<br />
20% 0.2<br />
→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Substitute Products X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />
III. External Environment<br />
35% 0.3<br />
→Economic Conditions X 10% 0<br />
→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Technology X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Societal Factors X 15% 0.2<br />
IV. Total Score<br />
100% 1.2<br />
The analysis of processes occurring on the real estate market requires long time series,<br />
because their nature is related to long-term trade cycles. In case of Tbilisi is a difficult task<br />
due to the economic transformation and political changes. Moreover, the reliability of data<br />
collected in previous years is undermined by the discrepancies between the official and<br />
market prices. The real estate and construction cluster in Tbilisi is characterised by high<br />
dynamics of the market potential and high potential of product growth. The parameters<br />
that apparently diminish its attractiveness include strong competition and people’s low<br />
economic potential. It is obvious that an important element of the cluster growth is the<br />
programme aiming at keeping systematic record of available land, which will allow the city<br />
to build a land market. The economic development is going to stimulate the real estate<br />
market both in the housing construction sector and in office, storage and industrial<br />
construction sector. Also the demand for new operating areas for trade companies is<br />
going to grow.<br />
34
Transportation cluster.<br />
Table 3-5 Transportation cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />
Indicators of Cluster<br />
Attractiveness<br />
Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />
low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />
Score<br />
I. Market Potential<br />
45% 0.6<br />
→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />
→ Output Growth X 10% 0.1<br />
→ Average Wages and<br />
employment X 20% 0.2<br />
II. Market Structure<br />
20% 0.1<br />
→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Substitute Products X 5% 0<br />
→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />
III. External<br />
Environment 35% 0.5<br />
→Economic Conditions X 10% 0<br />
→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Technology X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Societal Factors X 15% 0.3<br />
IV. Total Score<br />
100% 1.2<br />
The attractiveness of the cluster related to transport and logistics companies results<br />
mainly from the geographical location of Tbilisi where main Georgian and international<br />
transport routes meet.<br />
The globalisation of manufacturing and the related supply chains increase the demand for<br />
transport services. Logistics is getting increasingly important not only in Georgia itself, but<br />
also as a part of international economic relations. When assessing the attractiveness of<br />
the cluster the high marks have been given to the development potential and the products<br />
(services) growth potential. The general mark of 1.2 places the cluster slightly below the<br />
average, but the worldwide trends indicate that this cluster will develop dynamically in the<br />
future.<br />
The growth of commodity transportation logistics is first of all related to the economic<br />
activity and is defined as the industry task. Main areas of the city intervention include<br />
mainly giving access to developed land, promoting innovation and workforce training<br />
35
Industry cluster.<br />
Table 3-6 Industry cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />
Indicators of Cluster<br />
Attractiveness<br />
Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />
low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />
Score<br />
I. Market Potential<br />
45% 0.3<br />
→ Market Potential X 15% 0<br />
→ Output Growth X 10% 0.1<br />
→ Average Wages and<br />
employment X 20% 0.2<br />
II. Market Structure<br />
20% 0<br />
→ Suppliers X 5% 0<br />
→ Buyers X 5% 0<br />
→ Substitute Products X 5% 0<br />
→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />
III. External Environment<br />
35% 0.4<br />
→Economic Conditions X 10% 0<br />
→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Technology X 5% 0<br />
→ Societal Factors X 15% 0.3<br />
IV. Total Score<br />
100% 0.7<br />
The industry cluster has been marked as the least attractive. The old system left<br />
businesses closely dependent on the Russian markets and carrying the burden of high<br />
fixed costs. Consequently most of traditional industry companies closed down. Because<br />
of growing productivity, that has resulted from the use of new technologies, and stronger<br />
competition mainly of Asiatic countries the industrial sector is not very attractive. Apart<br />
form highly rated political situation and social indices the other attractiveness parameters<br />
of the cluster demonstrate low values. Therefore, it has been assessed well below the<br />
average. The revitalisation of buildings and warehouses that used to belong to closeddown<br />
production plants should become one of the priorities while creating the economic<br />
development plan for Tbilisi. Also the workers who have been made redundant should be<br />
re-trained and instructed how to find new jobs.<br />
36
Creative cluster<br />
Table 3-7 Creative cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />
Indicators of Cluster<br />
Attractiveness<br />
Assessment of Attractiveness Weights Score<br />
low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />
I. Market Potential<br />
45% 0.7<br />
→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />
→ Output Growth X 10% 0.2<br />
→ Average Wages and<br />
employment X 20% 0.2<br />
II. Market Structure<br />
€ 20% 0.2<br />
→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Substitute Products X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />
III. External<br />
Environment 35% 0.3<br />
→Economic Conditions X 10% 0.1<br />
→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Technology X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Societal Factors X 15% 0<br />
IV. Total Score<br />
100% 1.2<br />
The support for the development of small and medium businesses entering new sectors<br />
of new economy and using latest organisational and technological solutions should be a<br />
key element of Tbilisi economic development strategy. The cluster has been marked 1.2,<br />
which means that its attractiveness is above the average. It is its market growth potential<br />
and the potential of created products that should be assessed particularly high. In the<br />
situation when the traditional sectors of economy have collapsed as a result of economic<br />
and political transformation, small and medium enterprises generate the largest number<br />
of jobs. It is SMEs that fuel local economy and implement innovative solutions. Thanks to<br />
the city’s support for projects dealing with microcredits, credit security funds,<br />
entrepreneurship incubators, technology parks, promotion of local business, etc. the<br />
cluster is likely to grow the fastest and, consequently, to create new jobs. The cooperation<br />
of local authorities and the local business can contribute to improving not only the city<br />
economic parameters but also the local quality of life and the standards of offered<br />
services. In the longer perspective the companies in this sector are going to generate<br />
larger and larger share of the added value and attract more and more external capital that<br />
will finance new investments.<br />
37
Touristic cluster<br />
Table 3-8 Touristic cluster assessment of attractiveness<br />
Indicators of Cluster<br />
Attractiveness<br />
Assessment of Attractiveness Weights<br />
low (0) middle (1) high (2)<br />
Score<br />
I. Market Potential<br />
45% 0.5<br />
→ Market Potential X 15% 0.3<br />
→ Output Growth X 10% 0.2<br />
→ Average Wages and<br />
employment X 20% 0<br />
II. Market Structure<br />
20% 0.2<br />
→ Suppliers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Buyers X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Substitute Products X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Intensity of Rivalry X 5% 0<br />
III. External Environment<br />
35% 0.7<br />
→Economic Conditions X 10% 0.2<br />
→ Political situation X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Technology X 5% 0.1<br />
→ Societal Factors X 15% 0.3<br />
IV. Total Score<br />
100% 1.3<br />
The touristic cluster has received the highest mark of all the identified potential clusters.<br />
Its attractiveness results from the high market potential, the high potential of products<br />
(services) growth as well as of the high quality of its environment. Thanks to its cultural,<br />
architectural, social and historical values the touristic cluster is likely to make the city<br />
attractive to both occasional visitors and organised groups. The large number of financial<br />
institutions, international business corporations and support organisations operating in<br />
Tbilisi is a good basis for creating a wide range of offers for business tourism. Thanks to<br />
the stable political and economic situation a growing number of visitors are interested in<br />
Tbilisi, as well as in Georgia. Tourist potential includes the historic buildings, local culture<br />
and cuisine as well as local landscapes and nature. Also in this case the city should<br />
initiate and support projects helping local tourist industry who are aiming at building an<br />
integrated system of tourist information and a complex offer addressed to various types of<br />
tourism. The integration of the environment institutions can have a positive effect on the<br />
quality of the tourist offer<br />
38
`
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
1. Economies in transition - development trends of emerging markets.................................................. 4<br />
1.1. The analysis of trends for key industries of Tbilisi economy. ................................................................. 6<br />
2. Challenges and obstacles of Tbilisi new economy development.......................................................23<br />
2.1. Development opportunities of Tbilisi new economy .............................................................................23<br />
2.2. Identification of development barrieries.................................................................................................25<br />
2.2.1. Creative cluster survey results .......................................................................................................25<br />
2.2.2. Tourism cluster survey results........................................................................................................31<br />
3. Attracting Tbilisi to investors ....................................................................................................................36<br />
3.1. Tbilisi territorial development according to the basic historical stages.................................................36<br />
3.2. Tbilisi territorial structure.........................................................................................................................37<br />
3.3. New trends of Tbilisi city functional-spatial development under new social-economic<br />
conditions ................................................................................................................................................38<br />
3.4. Allocation of new development projects ................................................................................................41<br />
4. Tbilisi alternative development strategies ..............................................................................................45<br />
5. How Tbilisi can support new economy development ...........................................................................53
CHARTS<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TABLES
In the second half of the 20th century the economy of Tbilisi was based on<br />
industrial plants producing for the demand of the Soviet Union market.<br />
Cooperation links, legal regulations, transport infrastructure and business<br />
environment were oriented at satisfying the needs of this type of economy,<br />
therefore the change of production profile of entering new markets were<br />
hardly possible.<br />
After the collapse of the Soviet Union and, consequently, of the centrally<br />
managed economy many manufacturing firms in Tbilisi lost their markets and<br />
either closed down or reduced their employment and production. The system<br />
reform, introduction of market economy and opening to new markets resulted<br />
in a thorough transformation of Tbilisi economy.<br />
Although some positive effects can be observed, the transformation process<br />
is long and generates serious social problems and costs. In order to<br />
understand the ongoing changes, we cannot view the problem as merely a<br />
systematic one. The economy of Tbilisi is also influenced by other economic<br />
transformation factors that do not happen only in the post-communist<br />
countries, but are observed all over the world. These factors are:<br />
• globalisation and increasingly free flow of knowledge and ideas,<br />
capital, products and services as well as people among the regions<br />
and cities of the world,<br />
• the use of new technology by businesses, state and local<br />
governments as well as by ordinary people,<br />
• cultural changes in the family model and life aspirations of the young<br />
generation.<br />
Due to the overlapping effects of regained independence and system<br />
transformation on the other three universal processes both Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
are facing a great challenge.<br />
Public officials as well as entrepreneurs and ordinary residents of Tbilisi must<br />
understand the ongoing changes and their implications in order to take a<br />
maximum advantage of new opportunities. They have to reduce the social<br />
costs to minimum and concentrate their resources in the areas where the<br />
perspectives of growth are the most promising.
In order to strengthen the foundations of Georgia’s and Tbilisi’s new economic<br />
position and to maximise the effects of the transformation system, it is vital to<br />
introduce the following changes and reforms:<br />
1. The deep reform of Georgian economy resulted in the fact that<br />
environment regulators can facilitate establishing and running business on<br />
the terms equal to those in the developed countries with market economy.<br />
2. Building new transport and telecommunication infrastructures, that will<br />
connect Georgia with the partners in the region and in the world, will make<br />
it possible to export and import goods and services.<br />
3. The reform of the education system and introducing the culture of life long<br />
learning to instruct skilled workforce according to the standards of the<br />
global job market.<br />
4. Investments in technical infrastructure and the city revitalisation make<br />
Tbilisi an attractive place to live and do business.<br />
Phases of the city economy transformation process<br />
Transformation of an industrial town into a postindustrial city is a long-lasting<br />
and complex process. The examples of cities that have already undergone<br />
this process offer experience that is worth using when working on Tbilisi<br />
economic development plan.<br />
In the process of transformation three phases can be distinguished:<br />
• crisis of a traditional industrial town,<br />
• attracting foreign investors to the city,<br />
• inward development based on unique identity and own resources.<br />
The phases can overlap and their duration cannot be determined in advance.<br />
The intensity and directions of changes depend on the local actors, their<br />
cooperation and capability to implement plans.<br />
The first phase include:<br />
• a substantial amount of workforce is made redundant in industry<br />
sector,<br />
• entrepreneurs set up service and trading companies that do not<br />
require much capital,<br />
• deprivation of industrial districts,<br />
• deprivation of housing districts with low skilled communities,<br />
• development of informal sector,<br />
• education sector have no clear perspectives and teaching standards<br />
in new professions.<br />
Finding foreign investors make it possible to introduce to the economy the<br />
elements that in the first phase are available locally, such as:<br />
• capital,<br />
• new technologies in production and management,<br />
• new standards of employees’ recruitment,<br />
• new cooperation links with other national economies,<br />
• new products that are competitive on global markets.
It is hard to overestimate those benefits for the city economy that are<br />
generated by foreign investors, but we should not forget that the reasons why<br />
those firm invest in our cit must be thoroughly analysed. It will help us to take<br />
maximum advantage of these investments and prevent disappointment if our<br />
expectations are unrealistic.<br />
Foreign firms invest in order to:<br />
• lower the production costs,<br />
• increase the value of the invested capital,<br />
• enter new markets,<br />
• gain access to resources that are out of reach where they have been<br />
operating so far.<br />
In a longer perspective these companies transfer their business activity to new<br />
locations that provide them with better business environment.<br />
For a long-term competitiveness of the city economy the third phase is of key<br />
importance. It is based on endogenic potentials and the city identity.<br />
The development of local businesses also leads to new quality of cooperation<br />
with foreign investors who invest their capital not only to benefit from the<br />
consumption potential of the local market and from lower production costs,<br />
but are also interested in finding new partners who will give them access to<br />
better solutions. It means that financial relations change too – the investor not<br />
only bears the costs of their business activity, but also shares their profits with<br />
a local partner.<br />
<br />
In order to prepare guidelines on o available economic activities it was<br />
necessary to analyze thoroughly the industries of the strongest development<br />
potential in the city of Tbilisi.<br />
The Competitiveness Assessment report analyzed the role of Tbilisi economy<br />
in the national economy as well as the city’s competitive position among other<br />
cities in Georgia and in the region of Caucasus and Central Asia. Thanks to<br />
the application of proposed indicators, the SWOT analysis of competitiveness<br />
assessment both on the regional and the national level as well as due to the<br />
results of the City team’s and outside partners’ work, a further and deeper<br />
analysis was possible of these sectors which demonstrate a high growth<br />
dynamics and can create new jobs.<br />
- Tourist sector - hotel business mainly<br />
- Construction<br />
- Enterprises of trade, repair of vehicles, personal & household goods<br />
- Industry<br />
- Banking<br />
The competitiveness assessment report described the importance and links<br />
among the key clusters as well as their role in seeking opportunities for the<br />
future local economy. Guidelines on available economic activities are based<br />
on the analysis of these of the industries that demonstrate the highest growth<br />
of economic parameters and create the most significant number of jobs.<br />
Therefore, the Guidelines recommend certain measures to be taken in order<br />
to take the best advantage of the opportunities identified for Tbilisi.<br />
When analyzing the clusters a common methodology was adopted which had<br />
been developed by the City team and the outside partners during their work<br />
on the Tbilisi Competitiveness assessment. The analysis covers the period of<br />
2000- 2006 and compares the situation of individual industries in Tbilisi with
the rest of the country. In each of the industries the following parameters were<br />
studied: turnover, employment, salaries, the relation of the salaries to the ones<br />
in the whole business sector and the relation between the turnover and the<br />
employment in the examined years.<br />
<br />
Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
Hotels turnover in regions in mln GEL in 2006<br />
63,6<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
Percent<br />
Over 80% of revenue in<br />
the hotel industry is<br />
generated in Tbilisi. Two<br />
out of other regions of<br />
Georgia, i.e. Adjara and<br />
Mtsheta generate app.<br />
10% of the turnover. The<br />
last 10% are generated<br />
by the remaining<br />
regions.<br />
20%<br />
0<br />
7,5<br />
3,4<br />
Tbilisi Adjara Mtsheta<br />
Mtianeti<br />
0,7 0,4 0,1 0,1<br />
Guria Imereti Kakheti Racha<br />
Lekhumi<br />
0%<br />
<br />
4 000<br />
3 000<br />
Hotels employment in regions in 2006<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
Also, the employment in<br />
the hotel industry is the<br />
highest in Tbilisi, but<br />
Adjar and Mtshet are<br />
catching up.<br />
Employment<br />
2 000<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
Percent<br />
1 000<br />
1 668<br />
20%<br />
1 053<br />
0<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Adjara<br />
295 264<br />
142<br />
60 55 40 30 29 28<br />
0%<br />
Mtsheta Mtianeti<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Imereti<br />
Guria<br />
Kakheti<br />
Kvemo Kartli
Georgia turnover in hotels in mln GEL<br />
90,00<br />
80,00<br />
70,00<br />
60,00<br />
50,00<br />
40,00<br />
30,00<br />
Turnover in hotels in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
2006<br />
2005<br />
2004<br />
2003<br />
2002<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
In 2001-2006 a<br />
regular increase of<br />
hotel industry<br />
turnover was<br />
observed both in<br />
Tbilisi and in the<br />
whole Georgia. In the<br />
years of 2005 and<br />
2006 the turnover<br />
values doubled in<br />
comparison to 2004<br />
20,00<br />
2001<br />
0,00 20,00 40,00 60,00 80,00<br />
Tbilisi turnover in hotels in mln GEL<br />
<br />
Tbilisi turnover in hotels in mln GEL<br />
80,00<br />
60,00<br />
40,00<br />
20,00<br />
Turnover vs employment in hotels in<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2003<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
Simultaneously to the<br />
2001-2006 turnover<br />
leap Tbilisi hotel<br />
industry saw the<br />
increase in<br />
employment. 2003<br />
was the only year<br />
when employment<br />
levels fell below 2001<br />
values despite<br />
growing turnover<br />
0,00<br />
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700<br />
Tbilisi employment in hotels
Earnings in Tbilisi in business sector in GEL<br />
400<br />
380<br />
360<br />
340<br />
320<br />
300<br />
280<br />
260<br />
240<br />
220<br />
200<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
Earnings in business and tourism sector<br />
2006<br />
2005<br />
2004<br />
2003<br />
2002<br />
2001<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
In comparison to the<br />
private sector the<br />
earnings in the tourist<br />
sector were growing<br />
at a slower rate and<br />
in the years of 2004-<br />
2005 a even a certain<br />
decrease could be<br />
observed.<br />
Nevertheless, when<br />
compared with 2001<br />
the salaries in the<br />
tourist sector almost<br />
doubled, while in the<br />
private sector they<br />
more than tripled<br />
100<br />
100 120 140 160 180 200 220<br />
Avarage earnings in turist sector in Georgia<br />
in GEL<br />
<br />
100 000<br />
80 000<br />
60 000<br />
40 000<br />
Comparative analysis of turnover (Y axis - in<br />
mln GEL) and employment in hotels ( X axis)<br />
in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
Georgia turnover<br />
in hotels total<br />
Georgia<br />
employment in<br />
hotels total<br />
Tbilisi turnover in<br />
hotels<br />
Tbilisi employment<br />
in hotels<br />
The high rate at<br />
which turnover and<br />
employment grew in<br />
the hotel industry was<br />
seen both in Tbilisi<br />
and throughout<br />
Georgia. The<br />
increase of these two<br />
parameters was<br />
determined first of all<br />
by a significant<br />
growth dynamics in<br />
Tbilisi itself.<br />
20 000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
0<br />
1 000 1 500 2 000 2 500 3 000 3 500 4 000
Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />
1 200<br />
1 000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
Construction turnover in regions in 2006<br />
760<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
Percent<br />
In 2006 Tbilisi saw<br />
the highest values in<br />
Georgia of both the<br />
turnover and the<br />
employment in<br />
construction industry<br />
200<br />
20%<br />
0<br />
80<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Adjara<br />
44 42 37 35 21 18 16 6 4<br />
0%<br />
Imereti<br />
Guria<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
Kvemo Kartli<br />
Kakheti turn<br />
<br />
Employment<br />
50 000<br />
40 000<br />
30 000<br />
20 000<br />
Construction employment in regions in 2006<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
Percent<br />
The construction<br />
industry in Tbilisi<br />
generated almost<br />
80% of total turnover<br />
and employed about<br />
60% of all the<br />
construction workers.<br />
10 000<br />
23 513<br />
25%<br />
0<br />
Kvemo Kartli<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Tbilisi<br />
3 553 3 215 2 617 1 852 1 624 1 322 1 121 682 484 359<br />
Adjara<br />
Imereti<br />
Kakheti<br />
Guria<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
0%<br />
Racha Lekhumi
Construction turnover in Georgia in mln GEL<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
Turnover in construction sector in<br />
Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
After the period of<br />
2000-2004 when the<br />
construction industry<br />
grew slowly, the<br />
years of 2005-2006<br />
brought a dynamic<br />
growth of turnover. .<br />
2001<br />
200<br />
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800<br />
Construction turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />
<br />
Construction turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
Turnover vs employment in<br />
construction sector in Tbilisi<br />
2002<br />
2003 2001<br />
2004<br />
2006<br />
2005<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
Also the employment<br />
in constructions<br />
increased<br />
significantly in 2005.<br />
Unfortunately,<br />
despite the rise in<br />
turnover in the<br />
following year the<br />
employment<br />
practically stayed at<br />
the same level<br />
100<br />
8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 22000<br />
Construction employment in Tbilisi
Construction turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
Turnover vs earnings in construction<br />
sector in Tbilisi<br />
2001<br />
2002 2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
Along the increase in<br />
employment the<br />
earnings in the<br />
construction industry<br />
were growing as<br />
well. A significant<br />
rise in salaries was<br />
observed in 2005-<br />
2006.<br />
100<br />
100 200 300 400 500<br />
Earnings in construction sector in Tbilisi in<br />
GEL<br />
<br />
Earnings in business sector in Tbilisi in GEL<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
Earnings in business sector vs earnings in<br />
construction sector in Tbilisi<br />
2001 2002 2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
Also, if compared to<br />
the salaries in the<br />
whole private sector,<br />
the earnings in the<br />
construction industry<br />
in Tbilisi were<br />
growing<br />
systematically in the<br />
period of 2001-2006<br />
with the most<br />
considerable rise in<br />
2006<br />
100<br />
100 200 300 400 500<br />
Earnings in construction sector in Tbilisi in<br />
GEL
1 000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
Comparative analysis turnover (Y axis - in<br />
mln GEL) and employment (X axis) in<br />
Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
2002<br />
2006<br />
2005<br />
2004<br />
2006<br />
2005<br />
Construction<br />
turnover in Georgia<br />
Construction<br />
employment in<br />
Georogia<br />
Construction<br />
turnover in Tbilisi<br />
Construction<br />
employment in Tbilisi<br />
The rise in<br />
turnover and<br />
employment<br />
could be<br />
observed both in<br />
Tbilisi and<br />
throughout<br />
Georgia. In the<br />
last two years<br />
both parameters<br />
grew<br />
considerably,<br />
which indicates a<br />
boom in the<br />
construction<br />
industry in<br />
Georgia.<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2001<br />
200<br />
2003<br />
2002<br />
2001<br />
10000 20000 30000 40000
Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />
6 000<br />
5 000<br />
4 000<br />
3 000<br />
2 000<br />
Turnover in enterprises of trade, repair of<br />
vehicles, personal & household goods in regions<br />
in 2006<br />
3 693<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
Percent<br />
Also in the trade sector<br />
Tbilisi has a leading<br />
role in the regions of<br />
Georgia. About 70% of<br />
total turnover in the<br />
trade sector are<br />
generated in Tbilisi<br />
1 000<br />
20%<br />
0<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Guria turn<br />
Tbilisi<br />
422<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
Adjara<br />
272 194 192 146 92 86 38 22 5<br />
0%<br />
Imereti<br />
Kakheti<br />
Kvemo Kartlii<br />
<br />
Employment<br />
50 000<br />
40 000<br />
30 000<br />
20 000<br />
Employment in enterprises of trade, repair of<br />
vehicles, personal & household goods in<br />
regions in 2006<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
Percent<br />
Approximately 50% of<br />
people working in the<br />
trade sector are<br />
employed in Tbilisi. The<br />
fact that the employment<br />
in other parts of Georgia<br />
is rather high in relation<br />
to the declared income<br />
means that a lot of<br />
people in Georgia deal<br />
with trade to satisfy their<br />
elementary needs<br />
10 000<br />
24 310<br />
20%<br />
0<br />
6 378 4 714 3 647 2 880 2 777 1 707 1 168 882 728 362<br />
0%<br />
Kvemo Kartli<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Guria_empl<br />
Adjara<br />
Imereti<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Kakheti<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti
Trade turnover in Georgia in mln GEL<br />
5000,0<br />
4000,0<br />
3000,0<br />
2000,0<br />
Turnover in enterprises of trade, repair<br />
of vehicles, personal & household goods<br />
in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
The turnover in the trade<br />
sector is growing<br />
dynamically both in<br />
Tbilisi and in the rest of<br />
Georgia. It has been<br />
particularly apparent in<br />
the last three years<br />
2002<br />
2001<br />
1000,0<br />
1000,0 2000,0 3000,0 4000,0<br />
Trade turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />
<br />
Trade turnover in Tbillisi in mln GEL<br />
4000,0<br />
3000,0<br />
2000,0<br />
Turnover vs employment in enterprises of<br />
trade, repair of vehicles, personal &<br />
household goods in Tbilisi<br />
2006<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
When comparing the<br />
dynamics of the revenue<br />
and employment growth<br />
in the last six years it is<br />
obvious that these two<br />
parameters were<br />
interrelated until 2005. In<br />
2006, despite further rise<br />
in turnover, the<br />
employment fell.<br />
1000,0<br />
2002<br />
2001<br />
15000 20000 25000 30000 35000<br />
Trade employment in Tbilisi
Trade turnover in Tbillisi in mln GEL<br />
4000,0<br />
3000,0<br />
2000,0<br />
1000,0<br />
Turnover vs monthly earnings in<br />
enterprises of trade, repair of vehicles,<br />
personal & household goods in Tbilisi<br />
2003<br />
2002<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
A different situation can<br />
be observed when<br />
comparing the dynamics<br />
of turnover growth in the<br />
trade sector with rising<br />
salaries in the private<br />
sector. In this case a<br />
dynamic increase of<br />
turnover and earnings in<br />
the last two years could<br />
be seen<br />
2001<br />
50,00 100,00 150,00 200,00 250,00 300,00 350,00<br />
Earnings in trade sector in Tbilisi in GEL<br />
<br />
Earnings in business sector in Tbilisi in GEL<br />
400,00<br />
350,00<br />
300,00<br />
250,00<br />
200,00<br />
150,00<br />
Earnings in business sector vs earnings<br />
in enterprises of trade, repair of vehicles,<br />
personal & household goods in Tbilisi<br />
2003<br />
2002<br />
2001<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
Salaries in the private<br />
sector of Tbilisi have<br />
been growing<br />
dynamically and so have<br />
the salaries in the trade<br />
sector. Both parameters<br />
grew significantly<br />
throughout the last year<br />
100,00<br />
50,00 100,00 150,00 200,00 250,00 300,00 350,00<br />
Earnings in trade sector in Tbilisi in GEL
6000,0<br />
5000,0<br />
4000,0<br />
3000,0<br />
2000,0<br />
Comparative analysis turnover (X axis - in<br />
mln GEL) and employment (Y axis) in<br />
Georgia and Tbilisi in in enterprises of<br />
trade, repair of vehicles, personal &<br />
2006<br />
household goods<br />
2006<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2002<br />
2001<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
Trade turnover in<br />
Georgia<br />
Trade employment<br />
in Georogia<br />
Trade turnover in<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Trade employment<br />
in Tbilisi<br />
On the collective<br />
chart presenting the<br />
rate of the turnover<br />
and employment<br />
growth in Tbilisi and<br />
in Georgia a<br />
significant reduction<br />
of employment in<br />
2006 can be seen,<br />
despite the rise in<br />
the turnover values.<br />
This trend is present<br />
not only in Tbilisi but<br />
also in the whole<br />
Georgian trade<br />
sector<br />
1000,0<br />
2002<br />
2001<br />
0,0<br />
10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000
Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />
4 000<br />
3 000<br />
2 000<br />
1 000<br />
Industry turnover in regions in 2006<br />
1 409<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
Percent<br />
In the industry sector<br />
Tbilisi has a leading role<br />
in the regions of<br />
Georgia.<br />
Over 40% of revenue in<br />
the industry is generated<br />
in Tbilisi. One out of<br />
other regions of<br />
Georgia, i.e. Kvemo<br />
Kartli generate app.<br />
Over 20% of the<br />
turnover. The last 40%<br />
are generated by the<br />
remaining regions.<br />
785<br />
0<br />
276 237<br />
104 99 82 73 64 36 29 13<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Imereti<br />
Kakheti<br />
Adjara<br />
Abkhazja<br />
0%<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
Guria<br />
Kvemo Kartli<br />
<br />
Employment<br />
100 000<br />
80 000<br />
60 000<br />
40 000<br />
Industry employment in regions in 2006<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
Percent<br />
The employment in the<br />
industry is the highest in<br />
Tbilisi, and generates<br />
over 40% of industry<br />
employment in Georgia.<br />
Other leading in<br />
employment regions are<br />
Imereti and Kvemo Kartli<br />
and generates no more<br />
than 20% each.<br />
40%<br />
20 000<br />
35 137<br />
20%<br />
0<br />
Kvemo Kartli<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Abkhazja<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Tbilisi<br />
13 999 10 763<br />
5 630 4 813 4 543 3 042 1 892 1 821 1 215 880 497<br />
Imereti<br />
Adjara<br />
0%<br />
Kakheti<br />
Guria<br />
Racha Lekhumi
Industry turnover in Georgia in mln GEL<br />
3000,0<br />
2500,0<br />
2000,0<br />
1500,0<br />
Turnover in industry sector in Georgia<br />
and Tbilisi<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
In 2001-2006 a regular<br />
increase of industry<br />
turnover was observed<br />
both in Tbilisi and in the<br />
whole Georgia. In the<br />
years of 2005 and 2006<br />
the turnover values<br />
doubled in comparison<br />
to 2003.<br />
2001<br />
0,0 300,0 600,0 900,0 1200,0 1500,0<br />
Industry turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />
<br />
Industry turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />
1500,0<br />
1200,0<br />
900,0<br />
600,0<br />
300,0<br />
Turnover vs employment in industry<br />
sector in Tbilisi<br />
2003<br />
2002<br />
2004<br />
2001<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
When comparing the<br />
dynamics of the revenue<br />
and employment growth<br />
in the last six years<br />
despite further rise in<br />
turnover,<br />
the<br />
employment fell from<br />
2001-2003.<br />
Simultaneously to the<br />
2001-2006 turnover leap<br />
Tbilisi industry saw the<br />
increase in employment<br />
in years 2003-2006.<br />
2003 was the last year<br />
when employment levels<br />
fell values despite<br />
growing turnover.<br />
0,0<br />
26000 28000 30000 32000 34000 36000<br />
Industry employment in Tbilisi
Industry turnover in Tbilisi in mln GEL<br />
1500,0<br />
1200,0<br />
900,0<br />
600,0<br />
300,0<br />
Turnover vs earnings in industry sector<br />
in Tbilisi<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
A different situation can<br />
be observed when<br />
comparing the dynamics<br />
of turnover growth of<br />
turnover in the industry<br />
sector with rising<br />
salaries. In this case a<br />
dynamic increase of<br />
turnover and earnings<br />
could be seen.<br />
0,0<br />
100 150 200 250 300 350 400<br />
Earnings in industry sector in Tbilisi in<br />
GEL<br />
<br />
Earnings in business sector in Georgia in GEL<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
Earnings in business sector vs earnings in<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
YEARS<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
industry sector in Tbilisi When compared with<br />
2001 the salaries in the<br />
industry sector and<br />
2006<br />
private sector they more<br />
than<br />
tripled<br />
simultaneously. Both<br />
parameters grew<br />
significantly throughout<br />
the last year.<br />
In comparison to the<br />
private sector the<br />
earnings in the industry<br />
sector were growing at a<br />
faster rate.<br />
100<br />
100 150 200 250 300 350 400<br />
Earnings in industry sector in Tbilisi in GEL
3000,0<br />
2000,0<br />
1000,0<br />
Comparative analysis turnover (Y aixs - in<br />
mln GEL) and employment (X axis) in<br />
Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
2004<br />
20032002<br />
2005<br />
2001<br />
2006<br />
2006<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2002<br />
2001<br />
2005<br />
Industry turnover<br />
in Georgia<br />
Industry<br />
employment in<br />
Georogia<br />
Industry turnover<br />
in Tbilisi<br />
Industry<br />
employment in<br />
Tbilisi<br />
On the collective chart<br />
presenting the rate of<br />
the turnover and<br />
employment growth<br />
the rise in turnover<br />
and employment could<br />
be observed both in<br />
Tbilisi and throughout<br />
Georgia. In the last<br />
two years both<br />
parameters grew. In<br />
Georgia a significant<br />
reduction of<br />
employment in 2006<br />
can be seen but not in<br />
Tbilisi despite the rise<br />
in the turnover values<br />
in Tbilisi and Georgia<br />
in years 2001-2006.<br />
0,0<br />
20000 40000 60000 80000 100000<br />
Conclusions<br />
A thorough analysis of the tourist, construction, industry and trade clusters<br />
gives a clear picture of the situation and the processes that are taking place in<br />
the local economy of Tbilisi. The importance of the examined clusters can<br />
demonstrated by means of the following conclusions:<br />
- the examined clusters generate locally almost 80% of the national turnover<br />
in these clusters;<br />
- the employment in the examined clusters accounts for 50% - 80% of the<br />
total employment in Georgia;<br />
- a significant rise in the turnover volume (it almost doubled both nationally<br />
and in Tbilisi) is a common tendency for all the clusters, particularly in the<br />
observed period of 2004-2006;<br />
- due to the dynamic growth of the examined markets a change in the<br />
employment took place in each of them in the period of 2004-2006. The<br />
number of the jobs in the construction cluster almost doubled (not in the last<br />
year, though). After the period of falling figures since 2004 the industry cluster<br />
has been providing 10% more jobs annually and it is a cluster that generates<br />
the highest employment among the examined markets. Also the employment<br />
in the hotel industry has been growing since 2003 at a rate of 10% per year.<br />
The market of trade, repair of vehicles, personal and household goods, after a<br />
period of 2001 – 2005 when the employment was growing, has reduced its<br />
workforce below 25 000 people, i.e. to the level similar to 2003;<br />
- In each of the examined clusters the steady rise in salaries has been<br />
observed. The best paid jobs are in the construction cluster. The average pay<br />
in this cluster is 30% higher than in the whole Tbilisi business sector and its
salaries rose the most in the last examined years, i.e. 2005-2006. Another<br />
cluster where the salaries are higher than the business cluster average is the<br />
industry cluster where the significant rise in salaries – by about 50% - took<br />
place last year. The lowest salaries, not exceeding 220 GEL, were earned in<br />
the tourist cluster, although they did rise by 30% in the last examined year.<br />
Also, the pay level offered on this market in the three last examined years<br />
(2004-2006) was 30% lower than the salaries in the whole business cluster.<br />
The salaries in the trade, repair of vehicles, personal and household goods<br />
cluster grew considerably in the last examined year (2005-2006) and are<br />
comparable with the mean salary levels in the whole business sector. In the<br />
previous years the salaries rose gradually, but no more than by 10% yearly.<br />
- The comparative analysis of the turnover and employment in 2001-2006 in<br />
Tbilisi and Georgia demonstrates a strong correlation between the processes<br />
taking place on the examined markets in the Georgian national economy and<br />
in the economy of Tbilisi. The tendencies observed in Tbilisi have their<br />
reflection in the tendencies happening nationally, which is due mainly to the<br />
fact that Tbilisi economy in the area of the examined clusters accounts for<br />
over 50% of the national turnover and employment.<br />
The sector of strategic importance for the city economy is the banking sector.<br />
Although, when compared to other analysed industries, it does not generate<br />
many jobs, but it employs staff that is better qualified and better paid than<br />
other business sector employees. This is why a descriptive analysis of the<br />
banking sector in Georgia and Tbilisi has been carried out as well. In 1994 a<br />
reform of banking sector, introduction of a two-tier banking system (National<br />
Bank of Georgia and the commercial banks). 18 banks functioning in Georgia<br />
(March 2007), 13 of them are foreign controlled. Commercial bank’s total<br />
assets comprise 31% of GDP and liabilities comprise 24%. The perspectives<br />
of Georgia becoming the financial centre for the region are high but there are<br />
also significant challenges:<br />
Opportunities:<br />
- Azerbaijan growth – many forms of banking and insurance are impossible to<br />
introduce in the Arab countries. That is why investors from Muslim countries<br />
tend to locate their money in Christian countries’ financial institutions. It is a<br />
challenge for Georgia to attract capital from Muslim Azerbaijan which was the<br />
world’s fastest growing economy in 2006 with GDP real growth rate amounted<br />
to 32.5%.<br />
- Attractive location – Georgia is located in the centre of the Caucasus,<br />
bordering the Black Sea, between Turkey and Russia, there is no developed<br />
financial centre in this area<br />
- Professional support from western countries available – the example of<br />
Dubai shows that a country which is developing a big financial centre can use<br />
international help, especially in applying appropriate legal system and<br />
introducing special conditions for investors<br />
Challenges:<br />
- International standards requirements: transport links, transparent regulatory<br />
and legal systems, technological sophistication, a good quality of life for<br />
expatriate bankers, liquid capital markets, etc<br />
- Georgia still lacks internally adequate level of capital to finance large<br />
projects. Most local banks are unable to finance multimillion dollar projects.<br />
On the other hand, foreign banks are unfamiliar with their country and might<br />
be reluctant or too expensive to finance local projects. Regional banking<br />
would create a larger pool of capital to finance internal projects in Georgia.
It is of key importance for the city development to attract capital in the<br />
following areas. In order to improve the conditions of business activity and the<br />
quality of life it is most important to invest in technical infrastructure:<br />
• transport infrastructure,<br />
• telecommunication infrastructure,<br />
• utilities.<br />
In order to improve competitiveness of the economy the following investments<br />
in institutional infrastructure are necessary:<br />
• institutions facilitating access to funding,<br />
• institutions of labour market and workforce development,<br />
• institutions giving SME access to technical assistance (TA),<br />
• networking and marketing organisations,<br />
• know- how and technology transfer institutions,<br />
• space for work with service provided.<br />
To set up new firms and attract investors business space is necessary:<br />
• offices,<br />
• shops,<br />
• warehouses,<br />
• industrial units,<br />
• hotels and restaurants,<br />
• plots of land with infrastructure,<br />
• houses and apartments.<br />
The city can stimulate investment in these three areas in many ways. Some of<br />
these investments belong to the private sector, others will remain public<br />
investments. Part of the investments will be done by national investors, while<br />
another part of the capital will come from international markets.<br />
For the last twenty years we have been observing changes happening in the<br />
cities of Central and East Europe which have abandoned centrally planned<br />
economy and are joining global cooperation and competition. In the recent<br />
years in Georgia strategic investments in technical infrastructure have been<br />
done with both public and private money. Many international donors have<br />
started programmes building institutional infrastructure for the new economy.<br />
We can observe a boom on Tbilisi real estate market where, apart from<br />
housing estates, new office and shopping space has been built. New hotels,<br />
restaurants as well as factories and warehouses are being constructed as<br />
well. Some of the old industrial buildings in the inner city after renovation have<br />
been converted into moderate class offices and shops.
Progressing economic reform and further political stabilisation will help Tbilisi<br />
go through the process of economic change, similar to the one experienced<br />
by the cities of East Europe. Since Georgia has joined the global economy<br />
and the skilled workforce resources in CEE have been running out, soon new<br />
investors will get interested in Caucasus and Tbilisi.<br />
Presently, Tbilisi sees processes typical for the second phase of economy<br />
transformation described above. In the following years we will still witness<br />
growing share of private investments in such areas as telecommunications,<br />
transport, logistics, trade, hotels and restaurants, offices, light industries and<br />
confection , media and entertainment.<br />
Due to these investments the city economy will gain capital, new<br />
organisational standards of production, management, staff skills as well as<br />
new jobs and the awareness of international markets. Another direct benefit<br />
for Tbilisi will be the increase of revenues from personal income tax (PIT), all<br />
of which is the city budget revenue.<br />
The mechanism of financing local government by the money coming from the<br />
personal income tax makes the city more interested in participating in local<br />
economic development.<br />
New jobs, higher salaries, registering firms from the informal sector directly<br />
affects the city budget. The share of 2003-2006 PIT revenue in this budget<br />
proves how important it is for the city.<br />
<br />
Year Total city budget revenues PIT<br />
2006 466,9539 256,8945<br />
2005 412,3000 189,7347<br />
2004 328,744 159,357<br />
2003 205,3 75,939<br />
The table shows that two thirds of the city budget increase resulted from the<br />
growth of Personal income Tax paid by its residents. It means that city<br />
development strategies should be oriented for stimulation of high quality and<br />
good paid work places. Situation in Central and Eastern Europe shows that<br />
foreign investors and local companies are competing more and more for high<br />
skilled workers with good work attitude. Of course business environment,<br />
coast of running business and size of market, as well as provided<br />
infrastructure is still important but skilled workforce became to be more and<br />
more crucial factor.<br />
Summarising long term strategy should be oriented on new sectors that will :<br />
• create products and services that are competitive on global markets,<br />
• generate locally high added value,<br />
• create high quality jobs.
One of the elements of the process of writing the Local Development Plan for<br />
Tbilisi was the survey of two groups of beneficiaries – tourist and innovation<br />
companies. Such choice of the groups was determined by the outcomes of<br />
analyses of Tbilisi potential clusters. As a result the consultants identified<br />
seven potential clusters, out of which the tourism and creative clusters<br />
received the highest marks. The aim of the survey was to examine the<br />
barriers restricting the economic growth in the sectors (clusters) and identify<br />
the way public partners can support development of both sectors.<br />
<br />
As far as the employment volume in the surveyed companies is concerned<br />
two groups dominate – the ones with up to employees – 34% and the firms<br />
with 5-20 employees – 33 %. Companies employing 10-100 people account<br />
for 18%, and 15% are the companies with 100 and more workers.<br />
<br />
Employees in companies<br />
15%<br />
34%<br />
18%<br />
less than 5<br />
5 to 20<br />
20 to 100<br />
100 and more<br />
33%
Over one third of the firms declare annual income of 50,000-500,000 Lari.<br />
29% are the firms with income of 5,000-50,000 Lari. 18% share in the market<br />
have two groups of firms: the ones with income lower than 5,000 Lari and<br />
over 500,000 Lari. Vast majority of businesses (67%) whose income exceeds<br />
500,000 Lari are the companies employing over 100 workers.<br />
<br />
Company incomes in 2006<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
less than 5<br />
employees<br />
5 to 20 employees<br />
20 to 100<br />
employees<br />
100 and more<br />
employees<br />
Together<br />
less than 5000 GEL 54% 0% 0% 0% 18%<br />
5000-50000 GEL 31% 42% 14% 17% 29%<br />
50000-500000 GEL 15% 58% 43% 17% 34%<br />
More than 500000 GEL 0% 0% 43% 67% 18%<br />
Most of the surveyed companies (60%) have existed on the market for over 3<br />
years. 30% are the firms 1-3 years old. There are no companies who have<br />
been operating on the market for over 10 years. New companies account for<br />
4% of the examined population.<br />
Most of the companies (92%) have permanent access to the Internet. 65% of<br />
companies have declared that they have their web site.<br />
When asked about their opinion about the industry they are operating in 44%<br />
of companies reckon that their market will grow rapidly, 33% think that the<br />
market will grow slowly, while 15% are of the opinion that it will remain stable.<br />
Only 3% of companies predict that the market will be gradually shrinking. 5%<br />
have no opinion in this matter. None of the companies think that the market<br />
will decrease rapidly.<br />
Half of the surveyed firms react to new opportunities emerging on the market,<br />
20% of them have developed a formally adopted development plan for the<br />
next three years and have already been implementing it, 25% do not have<br />
any formal development plan document, but they have actually been<br />
implementing it. Only 5% of the surveyed businesses operate without any<br />
development plan for the next three years.
Companies opinion about their industry<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
less than 5<br />
employee<br />
5 to 20<br />
employee<br />
20 to 100<br />
employee<br />
100 and more<br />
employee<br />
Together<br />
High grow th of market 43% 31% 57% 67% 45%<br />
Slow grow th of market 43% 23% 29% 33% 33%<br />
Market w ill be stable 7% 31% 14% 0% 15%<br />
Slow decrease of market 0% 8% 0% 0% 3%<br />
High decrease of market 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />
No opinion 7% 8% 0% 0% 5%<br />
In case of 40% of companies high quality of products is an indicator of their<br />
competitiveness on the market. Another factor is the high quality of services,<br />
as it has been pointed out by 20% of businesses. Good brand is an important<br />
competitiveness factor for 18% of firms, attractive price – for 10%. 5% of<br />
businesses have no competition on the market, while 8% are not able to<br />
define the competitiveness of their product or service on their market.<br />
<br />
Competitiveness of the products<br />
6<br />
no opinion<br />
5<br />
high quality of service<br />
4<br />
3<br />
price<br />
high quality of products<br />
2<br />
1<br />
lack of other<br />
competitors on the<br />
market<br />
our products has good<br />
reputation<br />
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%<br />
Great majority of firms (60%) intend to introduce next year new<br />
products/services onto the market.
The surveyed companies claim that their main competitors are Tbilisi-based<br />
(92% od firms), while the remaining 8% regard as rivals companies from other<br />
parts of Georgia. The examined businesses do not recognise companies<br />
operating in foreign countries as their competition.<br />
35% of companies function on the market as a single entity, 25% cooperate<br />
with a larger foreign company, 15% cooperate with a larger Georgian<br />
company, while 25% cooperates with other similar firms based in Tbilisi.<br />
When assessing their environment the companies most often point out difficult<br />
access to investment and current spending funding. The companies express<br />
a good opinion about the access to transport links, telecommunication, the<br />
accessibility and quality of market services as well as about the access to high<br />
quality office and production facilities and space. They are also satisfied with<br />
the accessibility of new manufacturing technologies. 46% of them, however,<br />
are critical about administrative regulations that do not support business<br />
effectiveness. Almost 40% of companies indicated that the poor availability of<br />
skilled workforce is also a serious obstacle for companies to grow.<br />
<br />
Does the company have access to<br />
funds for investments?<br />
Does the company have access to<br />
funds for current spending?<br />
Is good quality office and<br />
production space available?<br />
Does the company have access to<br />
new technologies in production?<br />
Does the company have access to<br />
new technologies in organization<br />
and managing?<br />
Is there an easy access to skilled<br />
workforce?<br />
Does the company have access to<br />
technical support ?<br />
Is it possible to cluster activities in<br />
the market?<br />
Do the clients and the market have<br />
easy access to transportation links?<br />
Is telecommunication system easily<br />
accessible?<br />
Are market services easily<br />
accessible and of good quality?<br />
Do legal and administrative<br />
regulations support the<br />
effectiveness of businesses?<br />
Very good<br />
access<br />
conditions<br />
Good<br />
access<br />
conditions<br />
Problems<br />
with<br />
access<br />
Serious<br />
problems<br />
with access<br />
1% 9% 64% 26%<br />
2% 16% 73% 8%<br />
3% 47% 37% 13%<br />
5% 43% 29% 22%<br />
8% 34% 48% 9%<br />
1% 23% 40% 36%<br />
9% 28% 42% 22%<br />
2% 38% 39% 20%<br />
8% 48% 34% 9%<br />
16% 58% 16% 11%<br />
2% 42% 36% 20%<br />
1% 25% 29% 46%
Last year almost half of the surveyed companies observed an over 20%<br />
increase in sales and employment, while more than a half of them did not see<br />
any changes in export, investments and new marketing areas.<br />
<br />
Decrease<br />
over 20%<br />
Decrease<br />
below 20%<br />
No change<br />
Increase<br />
below 20%<br />
Increase<br />
over 20%<br />
In sales 1% 6% 18% 27% 48%<br />
In employment 1% 1% 31% 19% 48%<br />
In revenues 1% 4% 17% 36% 42%<br />
In export 1% 11% 53% 0% 34%<br />
In investments 3% 5% 58% 21% 13%<br />
In new marketing<br />
areas 1% 2% 52% 24% 22%<br />
In 2007 most of the companies declare increasing economic indicators,<br />
particularly in new marketing areas, employment, incomes and sales.<br />
<br />
Decrease<br />
over 20%<br />
Decrease<br />
below 20%<br />
No change<br />
Increase<br />
below 20%<br />
Increase<br />
over 20%<br />
In sales 0% 4% 11% 22% 64%<br />
In employment 0% 0% 23% 23% 54%<br />
In revenues 1% 4% 11% 28% 57%<br />
In export 1% 0% 39% 22% 38%<br />
In investments 1% 2% 23% 35% 39%<br />
In new marketing<br />
areas 1% 1% 24% 17% 57%<br />
86% of firms predicts strengthening their share in he market in the next two<br />
years.<br />
Moreover, the surveyed businesses pointed out the priority areas that require<br />
improvement and support of public institutions. It turns out that the companies<br />
first of all need: a guarantee fund (44 points in the ranking), vocational<br />
training courses for employees (38 points), better access to office space with<br />
service provided (28 points) and more training courses for managers (28<br />
points). On the fifth position the companies have placed a microcredit fund (27<br />
points).
Score<br />
Establishing a guarantee fund 44<br />
Training courses for employees 38<br />
More office space with service (e.g. for new set-ups) 28<br />
Managerial training courses 28<br />
Establishing microcredit funds 27<br />
Access to consulting services concerning new<br />
products/services creation<br />
13<br />
Support in entering new markets and export areas 12<br />
Support in implementing and applying new technologies 12<br />
Promotion of companies abroad 11<br />
Establishing a venture capital 8<br />
Electronic platform for new set-ups with e-business software 4<br />
Conclusions:<br />
• The surveyed creative cluster companies are relatively young, but<br />
having market experience, of very high growth dynamics in sales,<br />
employment, export and finding new marketing areas.<br />
• The companies remain competitive on the market mainly due to high<br />
quality of their products or services, which may be a result of<br />
cooperation with large foreign and domestic companies.<br />
• As their main competitors the companies identify other Tbilisi-based<br />
businesses. In a longer perspective they should take into<br />
consideration growing business activity of foreign companies and start<br />
preparing themselves for new competition by establishing an<br />
economic cluster.<br />
• The companies complain about the inaccessible investment and<br />
operational funding as the barrier hindering their growth. Another<br />
problem is a short supply of skilled workforce , which supports our<br />
recommendation for developing the education cluster in order to offer<br />
more training for line workers and managers.<br />
• In the entrepreneurs’ opinion current legal regulations should be<br />
modified so that local businesses could improve their effectiveness.<br />
• As priority areas the companies have chosen: guarantee and<br />
microcredit funds and vocational and managerial training packets.<br />
• Although the companies are satisfied with the access to existing office<br />
and production space, they point out, as another priority area, that it is<br />
necessary to enlarge this space, especially for newly established<br />
companies.
Most companies operating in the tourism cluster employ 5-20 people. In the<br />
surveyed group no company employs over 100 workers.<br />
<br />
Employees in companies<br />
16% - 20 to 100<br />
employee<br />
15% - less than 5<br />
employe<br />
less than 5 employees<br />
5 to 20 employees<br />
20 to 100 employees<br />
69% - 5 to 20<br />
employee<br />
Over half of the surveyed firms declares annual income of 5,000-50,000 Lari.<br />
Two groups of companies account for 20% share of the market each – the<br />
ones earning less than 5,000 Lari and 50,000-500,000 Lari. 8% of firms<br />
declare over 500,000 of annual income. As far as th employment is<br />
concerned, companies hiring less than 5 people declare income up to 50,000<br />
Lari. In case of companies employing 20 to 100 workers their incomes is<br />
evenly distributed into three groups.<br />
<br />
Company incomes in 2006 in tourism sector<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
less than 5<br />
employees<br />
5 to 20 employeeS<br />
20 to 100<br />
employees<br />
Total<br />
less than 5000 GEL 50% 13% 0% 20%<br />
5000-50000 GEL 50% 56% 33% 52%<br />
50000-500000 GEL 0% 25% 33% 20%<br />
More than 500000 GEL 0% 6% 33% 8%
Tourist companies have substantial market experience. Only 10% of them are<br />
younger than 3 years. Over the half of companies on this market have been in<br />
business for 3-10 years. 18% of the businesses are more than 10 years old.<br />
All the surveyed companies have a permanent access to the Internet and<br />
most of them have their own web page. Yet, 8% of them do not have their<br />
own web site.<br />
Great majority of the tourist firms predicts their market will be growing. 65% of<br />
them think it will be growing slowly, while 35% expects it to increase rapidly.<br />
9% of the companies have no opinion about the development perspectives for<br />
the tourism market in Tbilisi.<br />
<br />
Opinion about perspectives of tourism sector<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
less than 5 employees 5 to 20 employees 20 to 100 employees Together<br />
High grow th of market 45% 28% 50% 35%<br />
Slow grow th of market 45% 72% 50% 63%<br />
Market w ill be stable 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />
Slow decrease of market 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />
High decrease of market 0% 0% 0% 0%<br />
No opinion 9% 0% 0% 9%<br />
36% of companies operate according to company development strategy they<br />
have adopted. 26% follows the strategy but in an informalised way, while<br />
33% simply react to the opportunities arising on the market. 5% of companies<br />
have not developed any business strategy.<br />
According to 63% of companies, competitiveness is mainly based on the<br />
quality of offered products. Reputation and customer service are less<br />
important for the company competitiveness.<br />
<br />
Competitiveness of the products<br />
5<br />
high quality of<br />
service<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
price<br />
our products has<br />
good reputation<br />
lack of other<br />
competitors on the<br />
market<br />
high quality of<br />
products<br />
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Next year 82% of the surveyed companies intend to introduce a new product<br />
or service on the market.<br />
Most of the companies (94%) claim that their competitors are Tbilisi-based<br />
firms. The remaining 6% sees their competition in other parts of Georgia or<br />
abroad.<br />
When evaluating the environment of the tourism market the companies<br />
expressed their opinion that there was a good access to tourist offers in Tbilisi,<br />
to cooperation with tourist market regulators and to modern information<br />
technology. They indicated difficulties in accessing tourist infrastructure,<br />
specialist health tourism offers and tourist information system. Another serious<br />
problem hindering the industry development is, first of all, inefficient<br />
transportation system followed by the quality of skilled workforce and the lack<br />
of specialist offers dealing with training and education tourism as well as with<br />
health tourism.<br />
<br />
Very good<br />
access<br />
conditions<br />
Good<br />
access<br />
conditions<br />
Problems<br />
with<br />
access<br />
Serious<br />
problems<br />
with access<br />
Tbilisi tourist products offer 3% 74% 10% 13%<br />
Tbilisi tourism marketing 3% 41% 38% 18%<br />
Tourism information system 8% 38% 40% 15%<br />
Access to Tbilisi from abroad 13% 38% 35% 15%<br />
Inland country transportation 5% 46% 18% 31%<br />
Transportation system 3% 47% 16% 34%<br />
Sightseeing paths 3% 46% 28% 23%<br />
Quality of accommodation<br />
services 8% 42% 29% 21%<br />
State of tourist infrastructure 3% 26% 44% 28%<br />
Skilled workforce 10% 30% 30% 30%<br />
Language skills of workforce and<br />
community 10% 31% 36% 23%<br />
Security problem 8% 46% 23% 23%<br />
Calendar of events 8% 43% 35% 14%<br />
Cooperation with domestic tourist<br />
destinations 5% 53% 25% 18%<br />
Specialized Tbilisi tourist product<br />
offers - business tourism 5% 51% 32% 11%<br />
Specialized Tbilisi tourist product<br />
offers – education and training<br />
tourism 5% 24% 39% 32%<br />
Specialized Tbilisi tourist product<br />
offers – spa and health tourism 5% 21% 44% 31%<br />
Specialized Tbilisi tourist product<br />
offers – youth tourism 5% 31% 38% 26%<br />
Specialized Tbilisi tourist product<br />
offers –heritage tourism 20% 43% 25% 13%<br />
Access to IT technologies 8% 51% 28% 13%
Most of the surveyed firms did not observe any changes in last year’s<br />
economic parameters. 37% of firms observed over 20% increase in sales,<br />
25% - in employment and 33% - in income.<br />
<br />
Decrease<br />
over 20%<br />
Decrease<br />
below 20%<br />
No change<br />
Increase<br />
below 20%<br />
Increase<br />
over 20%<br />
In sales 3% 3% 31% 26% 37%<br />
In employment 3% 0% 56% 17% 25%<br />
In revenues 3% 3% 39% 22% 33%<br />
In export 5% 5% 64% 14% 14%<br />
In investments 4% 4% 63% 11% 19%<br />
In new marketing<br />
areas 3% 0% 77% 7% 13%<br />
Great majority of the surveyed firms intends to improve their economic<br />
outcome in 2007. 60% of companies are planning to increase their sales by<br />
over 20%, half of them intends to increase employment, investments or<br />
market share by over 20%. None of the companies expects their economic<br />
parameters to fall this year.<br />
<br />
Decrease<br />
over 20%<br />
Decrease<br />
below 20%<br />
No change<br />
Increase<br />
below 20%<br />
Increase<br />
over 20%<br />
In sales 0% 0% 18% 23% 60%<br />
In employment 0% 0% 28% 21% 51%<br />
In revenues 0% 0% 20% 20% 60%<br />
In export 0% 0% 35% 19% 46%<br />
In investments 0% 0% 31% 13% 56%<br />
In new marketing<br />
areas 0% 0% 30% 18% 52%<br />
The surveyed businesses pointed out the priority areas that required<br />
improvement and support of public institutions. These areas include building<br />
new sightseeing paths, access to Tbilisi from abroad, improvement of tourist<br />
infrastructure and tourist information system.
Score<br />
Sightseeing paths 27<br />
Access to Tbilisi from abroad 26<br />
State of tourist infrastructure 26<br />
Tourism information system 25<br />
Tbilisi tourist products 24<br />
Tbilisi tourism marketing 22<br />
Inland country transportation 14<br />
Quality of accommodation services 14<br />
Transportation system 13<br />
Skilled workforce 10<br />
Security problem 10<br />
Specialized Tbilisi tourist product offers - education and training<br />
tourism 4<br />
Cooperation with domestic tourist destinations 3<br />
Calendar of events 2<br />
Specialized Tbilisi tourist product offers - spa and health tourism 2<br />
Specialized Tbilisi tourist product offers - youth tourism 2<br />
Access to IT technologies 2<br />
Specialized Tbilisi tourist product offers - business tourism 1<br />
Specialized Tbilisi tourist product offers - heritage tourism 1<br />
Language skills of workforce and community 0<br />
Conclusions:<br />
• The tourism cluster companies have substantial market experience,<br />
precisely defined development plans and employ 5-20 workers.<br />
• They treat the Internet access and own web page as a working tool<br />
and a way to present their business offer.<br />
• The companies compete on the market mainly by means of high<br />
quality products and services. Next year they are going to increase<br />
their offer with new products and services.<br />
• Their competition are first of all local businesses operating in Tbilisi in<br />
the same industry. The companies are not afraid of the competition<br />
from other parts of Georgia and from abroad.<br />
• They consider a barrier for the industry development such areas as:<br />
the quality of tourist infrastructure, the non-existent tourist information<br />
system and the lack of specialist tourist offers (mainly the health<br />
tourism offer).<br />
• According to the surveyed firms, another serious problem for the<br />
industry development is the transportation system in Tbilisi, the quality<br />
of the skilled workforce and the lack of specialist offer for education<br />
and training tourism as well as for health tourism.<br />
• In the companies’ opinion the market will be systematically growing<br />
and generating new jobs.<br />
• As priority areas requiring intervention of public institutions the<br />
surveyed companies pointed out the need to build sightseeing paths,<br />
better access to Tbilisi from abroad, improved tourist infrastructure<br />
and more effective tourist information system.
Contemporary territorial structure of Tbilisi was formed in the process of city<br />
historical development as a result of internal and external factors impact. This<br />
process consists of several emphatic chronological stages.<br />
Feudal age (from recognition of Tbilisi as a capital city to the end of the XVIII<br />
century). The city is developed on both embankments of the river Mtkvari, in<br />
the limited territorial conditions – basically, within the city fence. In the end of<br />
this period can be observed the trend of moving out of the fence in the mode<br />
of external district.<br />
Period of Russian empire (1801-1917) - The city self-defensive surrounding is<br />
losing significance, Tbilisi first invades in higher Plato of the right embankment<br />
of the river Mtkvari; on the left embankment German colony is established;<br />
later occurs its and outskirt countries incorporation into Tbilisi administrative<br />
boarders. The city acquires the trend of linear development, basically in the<br />
upper direction of the river Mtkvari. Coexistence of ancient “Asian” and<br />
modern “European” parts is formed like metaphoric description of “doubleface<br />
Ianus”.<br />
Short term existence of Georgian democratic republic (1918-1921) added<br />
nothing to Tbilisi in terms of territorial development.<br />
Soviet period (1921-1991) was marked with emphatic increase of capital<br />
population and its territory. All parameters of the city development were<br />
regulated by General plans; In the Soviet period, since 1934, 3 general plans<br />
had been adopted; The calculating period of the last of which was accounted<br />
till 2000. According to the general plan, residential massifs, industrial-storage<br />
zones are created in the peripheries, social-cultural and storage-technical<br />
infrastructure are developed; For the first time, attention is paid to the urban<br />
heritage; also considerable attention is paid to the city green plants and<br />
suburban recreational zones.<br />
Period of Independence (1991- till now). In recent years the city has been<br />
developing on behalf of the internal territorial resources, often, contradictional<br />
to the emerged building process and without taking into consideration<br />
interests of the residents. Under the conditions of reducing Tbilisi population<br />
number and beginning suburbanization, in the end of 2006 emphatic<br />
expansion of the capital administrative boarders (recently created Didgori<br />
region) and separating of the “Old Tbilisi” administrative raegion acquires a<br />
new space to the capital urban problem. This challenge should be answered<br />
by the announced contest of the 3rd April of 2007 on composing “general<br />
plan of Tbilisi land use”.
Such immanent feature of Tbilisi spatial development as linear was naturally<br />
reflected in the configuration of its center. Logical Urban researches held yet<br />
in the Soviet period, proved that entire city center of Tbilisi is developing linear<br />
along the river Mtkvari gorge. Localization of city forming objects and mental<br />
maps of Tbilisi residents make this fact evident. Thus, Tbilisi was exposing the<br />
trend of natural development of the long center, in the widths direction of city<br />
center in the general plan, resisting the voluntary approach of turning to the<br />
Tbilisi sea.<br />
Central structures expose general trends of development upper of the river<br />
Mtkvari; Although lately, the desire of allocating city forming objects within “Old<br />
Tbilisi” and in the direction of the flow of Mtkvari has been emphasizing. Thus,<br />
Tbilisi common city center territorially expands from the Freedom square in<br />
two directions.<br />
First and basic, on the right embankment of the river Mtkvari implies Rustaveli<br />
Avenue, acquires several branches at the Philharmonic buildings in the<br />
direction of Merab Kostava and Melikishvili streets, moving into the Ilia<br />
Chavchavadze Avenue, Konstantine Gamsakhurdia street and Vazha-<br />
Phshavela Avenue. Simultaneously center forming functions of David the<br />
builder and Akaki Tsereteli Avenues are being developed.<br />
The second direction of the city develops from the Freedom Square including<br />
the old city and, then in the directions of Avlabari-Isani and Ortachala with<br />
linear branches.<br />
Thus, the features of the Tbilisi common city center are:<br />
• Linear and dynamic character;<br />
• Expansion of the linear structures on behalf of the streets;<br />
• Poor widthy functional-planning links between the parallel central<br />
axises;<br />
• Increasingly emphasized importance of the old city;<br />
• Dispersive development of the city forming objects.<br />
Such features of the Tbilisi center makes difficult identification of the center<br />
core.<br />
More simple is pointing out the transit and commercial corridors. Tbilisi located<br />
in the TRACECA corridor is forced to let pass international cargo flows via its<br />
embankment, because of the damaged condition of the Tbilisi sea beyond<br />
road. These embankments, essentially, are the only draught highways on the<br />
whole territory of Tbilisi. For now the issue on cutting Kakheti highway till<br />
Avchala is being worked out, what will immensely unload the city center.<br />
Coming out of the specific location of the Tbilisi relief (differences between<br />
the heights of the river Mtkvari shores) widthy links are more complicated. The<br />
railway line within the city creates the same problem; overcoming of the<br />
railway line for the aboveground transport is possible only in two places, with<br />
making distance of 5 kilometers between them. Implementation of viaduct in<br />
the direction of Didube-Nadzaladevi accounted in general plan is far from<br />
realizing.
Coming out of the linear configuration of the territorial structure, large<br />
residential districts, basically, were constructed in the North and North-West,<br />
also in the South-East parts of the city. Their construction was performed on<br />
the precious agricultural lands, what was natural in Soviet period in the<br />
conditions of extensive assimilating of the city territories.<br />
As a result of expansion of Tbilisi territory in 2006 the capital city assimilated<br />
part of the Mtskheta and Gardabani districts. Consequently, the diversified<br />
problem of functioning of the country like residential areas in the joined part<br />
has become very actual. Social-cultural and engineering-technical<br />
rehabilitation or amenities will significantly increase the volume of Tbilisi<br />
housing fund, will improve its quality and become the fundament of<br />
broadening the base of city revenues.<br />
The conditions of the development of the capital, also must be discussed<br />
within the Tbilisi agglomeration, which implies significant part of Mtskheta,<br />
Gardabani regions, cities of Tbilisi and Rustavi. Relevant problem must be<br />
analyzed on the level of regional planning, taking into consideration basic<br />
trends of reorganization of the country territorial arrangement and urbanization<br />
in future.<br />
<br />
<br />
New stage of Tbilisi functional-spatial development begins with reestablishment<br />
of Georgia independence (1991). But, the face of contemporary<br />
capital was essentially affected by the last period of communistic regime.<br />
At that time, in order to facilitate the political tension in September of 1987 by<br />
the directive bodies of Soviet Georgia was adopted document, which<br />
practically was the first one, that admitted some construction initiative from the<br />
side of population. The enforcement of the document was stimulated by the<br />
tragic events of 9 April of 1989; In several weeks was issued decree by Tbilisi<br />
city council executive committee, which gave permissions to the residents of<br />
the state housing fund to lead the additional building of balconies, verandas<br />
and other supporting receptacles by their financial means, following particular<br />
technical conditions. Tbilisi was covered by ugly, often unsecured additional<br />
buildings, which acquired more and more ugly look to the unsuccessful<br />
without it blocks of mass building.<br />
Little early, were taken first steps in the direction of making land accessible for<br />
the city residents, outside the city giving kitchen gardens and country houses<br />
in the form of cooperatives. In this new emerged areas land and house<br />
volumes were severely defined by norms. City residents who desired to have<br />
own land and individual houses immediately started construction; Tbilisi<br />
outskirt territory in the radius of 30-40 km immediately was covered by country<br />
like residential areas, that are now in the various stages of finish.<br />
After coming in the power in 1991 the government of Zviad Gamsakhurdia<br />
was treating with relevant care privatization issue of the real estate – city lands<br />
including housing fund.
Law project on “privatization of housing” published in September of the same<br />
year, basically was responding to the international practice, mainly, because<br />
of working out of the housing reform economic aspects and was giving hope<br />
for successful urban management under the modern social-economic<br />
conditions.<br />
But at the edge of 1991-1992 as a result of the state overturn the direction<br />
was taken on unaccounted, populist solutions. Yet on the 1st February of<br />
1992 decree of the ministers’ cabinet of the republic of Georgia #107 on “<br />
privatization of housing (giving for free) in the republic of Georgia”. it was<br />
underlined in the document, that “the objects of privatization maybe house<br />
(flat) of state and public fund, among them damaged, reconstructional or<br />
uninhabited flat in the house, that required capital repair. In the document<br />
insufficiently was worked out organizational forms of multi-flat houses and<br />
financial-economic mechanisms. With one hand wave in Georgia was created<br />
new multi number class of real estate proprietors, who immediately made<br />
familiar with their rights, without having any imagination on proprietors duties.<br />
Thus, for “homo soveficus” the psychology of common dependant was not<br />
only eliminated, but was even enhanced in terms of requirement of the “new<br />
proprietors” from government to lead the repairment activities in really<br />
damaged houses.<br />
The results of the 25 April earthquake in 2002 emphasized the complaints of<br />
the poor proprietors of the damages houses in the direction of government.<br />
Simultaneously with the lack of care rapid degradation of housing fund, in one<br />
trace with political and economic stabilization, commercial housing<br />
construction began development; social (municipal, public) housing fund was<br />
not being built in Tbilisi even till nowadays – despite the necessity, societal<br />
requirements and international recommendations.<br />
Explosion of commercial housing construction naturally emphasized its<br />
territorial development issue. Distribution of lands according to the group and<br />
private interests was followed by the deliberated discrimination of the last<br />
Soviet Tbilisi reconstruction and by development of the general plan,<br />
accounted on 2000. Assimilating and using of the city lands’ scheme was<br />
activated reflecting the corruptive or group interests. According to the<br />
evaluation of international organizations, at that time , by the volume of<br />
bribing, issuance of construction permissions was on the second place in<br />
rating after the bribery rate in police.<br />
Commercial housing construction mainly was intending to concentrate on<br />
historically formed, most prestigious districts such as Vake, Vera, Mtatsminda.<br />
Prestige category, characteristic for Georgian culture, and which finally, is<br />
reflected in the prices of real estate, acquired commercial meaning and was<br />
also reflected in some normative acts. New multi-storied houses were often<br />
built without accounting accurate city constructive situation, sanitary-hygienic<br />
or housing norms, despite the protests of residents. Today its already evident,<br />
that such tightening of building in prestigious districts caused ecological<br />
problems, surplus of individual transport, overloading of social-cultural and<br />
engineering-technical infrastructure, and finally, decline of urban environment<br />
quality.<br />
Most grave situation was created in Old Tbilisi, which acquired remarkable<br />
monument defensive status yet in the Soviet period. Scandal housing<br />
construction in the defensive zones led to the fact, that Tbilisi application in<br />
2002 on inclusion in the UNESCO list of world heritage, was delayed till<br />
legislative, institutional and in terms of practical improvement of the situation.
In recent years in the sector of housing construction developer activities<br />
acquired more civilized look. This is maintained both by the initiatives of<br />
Georgian ministry of culture, monument defense and sport and by the<br />
corporative refinement of developers itself (emerging the developers<br />
association, adopting the appropriate ethics code, etc. ). It is worth to mention,<br />
that developer activities is expanding in terms of territory and it is moving to<br />
the regions near to the center (Saburtalo); and recently to the regions, early<br />
considered not to be prestigious.<br />
In the terms of above, best example is Avlabari district, which despite its<br />
features (central position, good micro-climate, transport infrastructure, best<br />
view and exposition to the various parts of the country), was unevenly<br />
positioned on the lower place in the classification of prestige districts. First one<br />
who paid attention to the city constructive potential of Avlabari was great<br />
friend of Tbilisi, scientist, architect from Hamburg Iost Schram, according to<br />
who’s initiative in 1997 in the architectural institute of Georgian central<br />
university began implementation of student project on renewing external area<br />
of Avlabari. Simultaneously, in Avlabari was being implemented such city<br />
forming activities, as construction of the Saint Trinity Cathedral and office of<br />
the President of Georgia. All above mentioned increased the district prestige<br />
and relatively price on the land.<br />
Some developers take even more accurate steps and directs its interests to<br />
yet non-prestigious territories. As an instance of this must serve start-up<br />
project called “Ortachalis Turfa” implemented by the “Arci” company in the<br />
south-East part of the city, and which attracts buyers with relatively low prices<br />
and complexity of building (with the components of social infrastructure).<br />
But, in terms of territorial attractiveness, traditional priority is on the side of<br />
housing construction at the edge of Tbilisi North and North-West (Bagebi, Didi<br />
Digomi), where important territorial resources and using of former agricultural<br />
lands made possible to create homestead building. Besides the best microclimate<br />
conditions, prestige of this zone was also encouraged by the<br />
construction of the new Embassy of the USA.<br />
Developers territorial preference naturally, is mainly defined by the priorities of<br />
potential consumers. From this side, it’s very essential, that if early together<br />
with prestige crucial importance was given to the prestige of accommodation<br />
location and quantitative parameters (number of rooms, space), recently has<br />
been observed emphasize of esthetic (“fine view”, “nice architecture”) and<br />
ecological (“fresh air”, “greenery”)requirements.<br />
The latest situation, together with general trend, states on a new position<br />
destiny of country like residential areas in the Tbilisi surroundings existed yet<br />
in the end of Soviet Period. Their engineering technical and social<br />
rehabilitation will positively influence general structure of Tbilisi housing fund<br />
and will be economically useful for the city. This topic deserves deeper<br />
attention and more than that implementation of political projects.<br />
In this direction really supporting factor is expansion of Tbilisi administrative<br />
boarders in the end of 2006 on behalf of the hinterland and summer-cottage<br />
zone. on the meeting of the 30th march of 2007 Tbilisi city council (Sakrebulo)<br />
approved enhanced new fiscal zoning of Tbilisi, which will support developer<br />
activities in the newly joined territories and thus, expansion of the<br />
suburbanization process. It is important, that some companies have already<br />
taken advanced steps for construction of the residential community. For
example, construction of “Tsavkisis Valley” by one of the Georgian-Jewish<br />
company.<br />
On the background of commercial housing construction, for balancing the<br />
structure of Tbilisi housing fund, emergent task is creation of so-called “social”<br />
(“municipal”, “public” ) accommodation. AS it was mentioned, the decree of<br />
1st February of 1992, practically, transformed almost whole housing fund of<br />
the city into the private property. Government still resists the creation of social<br />
accommodation, what strains the social climate in the society of Tbilisi.<br />
<br />
Moving into the new social-economic conditions caused dramatic changes of<br />
office and commercial objects allocation terms in the city planning structure.<br />
Large state establishment organizations of the Soviet period used to occupy<br />
large scale, often specially constructed buildings. Cultural-household objects<br />
were nearly even distributed in the city cell, relevant to the steps of services<br />
shared at that time, with taking into consideration normative radiuses of<br />
accessibility.<br />
Market relations, mainly, were reflected in dislocation of small trading objects.<br />
In 1993 was allowed street trade practically everywhere and in every form.<br />
This type of trade soon was joined by transformation of ground floor of the<br />
residential houses into the trading and household establishments. It’s<br />
important to mention, that in the process of seeking own space on the market<br />
the profile and class of these small objects was somehow changed; This<br />
process, really little slowly but still can be witnessed. Houses ground floors<br />
which made shelters for trading and service objects, weren’t satisfying new<br />
purpose with their first planning structure (problem of entrance from the street;<br />
engineering equipment, sanitarian conditions, non-existence of stores and<br />
secondary closets, etc.). many problems are generated from arranging<br />
downstairs in the cellars, what often was managed to accomplish using the<br />
street sidewalks. Today in the central part of the city can be noticed internal<br />
development of the offices already allocated on the ground floor, on behalf of<br />
the second, seldom the third floors. In terms of real estate must be underlined<br />
the fact, that such legal persons, as a rule, don’t participate in the<br />
management of the whole house (condominium), despite the requirements of<br />
the civic code.<br />
Early simultaneously only with the diversification of the residential house<br />
functions, was implemented departing, reducing of the structures of above<br />
mentioned large organization-establishments and degovernmentation of most<br />
of their owned buildings. Most important is the fact, that this process was<br />
being implemented omitting municipalization stage of the real estate, with<br />
fading the urban land problem. Even the management of the buildings in the<br />
hands of multi proprietors wasn’t meeting even old requirements (elevators,<br />
engineering equipments, cleanliness, fire security, etc.).<br />
Following stage of development is presented by promotion and construction<br />
of originally mixed function buildings, when 1-2 floors were accounted on<br />
office or trade and service objects, above which were located flats.<br />
Simultaneously some large companies were constructing separately located<br />
headquarters.<br />
New stage of creating and exploiting office spaces is construction of the<br />
special buildings, what is recently observed in Tbilisi. In this direction, it’s<br />
worth to notice basically office and trade building, which is being constructed<br />
on Ilia Chavchavadze Avenue #34, and “Axis towers” also on I.
Chavchavadze Avenue. The latest is the mode of “second hand” architecture<br />
(such objects of curved prisms (forms) are planned in Istanbul and Astana),<br />
but today already announced prices dictate that These office spaces will<br />
respond to the high rate of the international classification.<br />
As for the mass and wholesale large trade objects (so-called “’bazrobebi”),<br />
Two of them Lilo and Navtlughi fairs are located in the South-East periphery of<br />
the city, and the attempts to move other two (to Dezertirebi market and Eliava<br />
street) to the North-West periphery had no results and the government was<br />
forced to be contended with making them “noble” at the same places.<br />
Although, in terms of city planning, their location will dramatically damage the<br />
city environment. Expansion of the restaurants and entertainment<br />
establishment network (including casinos) maybe considered as an average<br />
indicator of increase of economic wealth of the particular part of the<br />
population. In addition if the casinos are concentrated in the central part of the<br />
city (today, as a result of particular legislative steps only several casinos are<br />
operating in Tbilisi and there’s an idea of moving all of them to Tskhaltubo<br />
resort – like the planned measurements in Russia), newly opened restaurants<br />
are moving in the direction of Old Tbilisi or Automobile highways, basically on<br />
the Mtkvari embankment and in the North-West exit of the city.<br />
Construction of the sport-recreational objects are not following the<br />
requirements - there are only 2 modern swimming pools in Tbilisi. It’s being<br />
implemented assimilating of the water reservoirs in terms of amenities – here<br />
on the first place is “kus Tba” lake; It is followed by Lisi lake and Tbilsi sea.<br />
Internal quarter mini-field (ground) network is being expanded (basically, with<br />
artificial cover). By means of private capital new tennis ground was built in<br />
Dighomi.<br />
Energetically is being constructed Orthodox churches, besides the Saint<br />
Trinity grand Cathedral, small parochial churches network will include every<br />
residential district – as central, so peripheral. It must be separated issue of<br />
developing hotels network. Recently, World brands of hotel economy such as<br />
Sheraton, Marriott, Hilton, Radisson have been wildly interested in Tbilisi.<br />
They operate in several directions – reconstruction of already existed hotels,<br />
demolition of already existed building and construction of the new hotels,<br />
acquiring of city forming objects and their adaptation. At the current stage<br />
such interest from the world brands isn’t defined only by new economic<br />
interests (operating hotels completing with guests is far from normative); It<br />
must be defined as by future expectations, so by the presence factor of<br />
assimilating world geography. Besides the entrance of the hotel-business<br />
grands on Tbilisi market, network of the small hotels are being developed –<br />
due to their low prices and familiar atmosphere. But, the main problem for the<br />
city ambitions to become tourist center still remains non-existence of large,<br />
cheap hotels and hostels for mass tourism. We’ll also name discrepancies of<br />
the city information system (including language) and catastrophic conditions of<br />
the public toilets – as in quantity terms, so in terms of quality among the<br />
factors biasing tourism in Tbilisi.<br />
In terms of internal city transport Tbilisi subway plays its stable role, which<br />
saved Tbilisi from functional disintegration in the period of civil war. In the<br />
recent years, as a result of reforms implemented in the transport system, tram<br />
(transport) has been practically moved out of the city streets, also trolley bus<br />
lines has been reduced to minimum, little early fully was demolished the<br />
network of the rope lines. Positive event is changing unmanaged multi
number of micro bus taxis (“marshutka”) in the central street of the capital with<br />
civic buses, although set of factors bias the normal functioning of the public<br />
transport (the model of acquired buses; discrepancies of traffic organization –<br />
for example “transport triangle of the Vera district”; ignoring the interests of<br />
pedestrians, mainly the disabled persons; low rate of discipline among the<br />
drivers and pedestrians; non-existence of automobile residences, etc. ).<br />
Improvement of Tbilisi city transport system will be facilitated by implementing<br />
recommendations on the basis of international contest, presentation of which<br />
is expected in May.<br />
As for external transport, activities for rehabilitation of the Tbilisi central railway<br />
station arebeing performed; construction of railway branch from Kakheti line to<br />
newly built airport is expected to start; Although non-existence of the<br />
technical-economic documentation and miscalculation of the project in the<br />
layer of regional planning must be considered as a serious discrepancy.<br />
Under the conditions of distributing real estate, most attractive advantage of<br />
the industrial objects was considered to be territories occupied by the latest. It<br />
was particularly essential in the central zones and the ones near it. In the<br />
years of Independence most part of the Tbilisi industrial objects stopped<br />
functioning; Engines and equipments were sold as black scrap metals; And<br />
the buildings itself in terms of modern technologies, didn’t make any sense<br />
anymore. Instead of it, increased the interests of the builders to the territories<br />
occupied by the above mentioned objects. On some of this territory already is<br />
implementing construction of commercial housing (for example, silk weaving<br />
plant territory in Vera district). Together with this, still exist such large industrial<br />
zones, which don’t yet rise interest among developers (for instance, industrial<br />
zone of Ulianovka); Converse of such zones would be facilitated in the case of<br />
supporting steps taken by state/city.<br />
Tbilisi, as a capital of the country takes functions of the central and city<br />
government, which is reflected in the location of administrative institutional<br />
structures and relevant objects.<br />
Central functions are mainly gathered in the center of Tbilisi, but also there are<br />
some exceptions. The example of territorial decentralization effort is the<br />
Constitutional Court, moving of which was planned at first in the direction to<br />
the city of Mtskheta and now to the city of Kutaisi. New residence of the<br />
President of Georgia is being built in the district of Avlabari, which has a<br />
prospect for urban renewal.<br />
As for the city administration, as a result of new reform “Greater Tbilisi”<br />
consists of 7 administrational districts. Their overwhelming sizes and the<br />
difficulties with access to the district administrations (so-called “gamgeoba”)<br />
doesn’t respond to such fundamental principles of the local self-government<br />
as subsidiary and, also the historically formed tradition of structuring Tbilisi<br />
territory as natural community.<br />
Current radical reforms in the educational system was reflected in the<br />
territorial localization of educational and upbringing establishments of various<br />
level and rate. If early, in the Soviet period, nursery schools of children and<br />
secondary schools networks, basically, served the population living near<br />
them, today under the conditions of educational objects privatization and<br />
abolishment of the records, the importance of their profile and financial terms<br />
of teaching are emphasized.
As for the higher education, its objects are experiencing enlargement,<br />
institutional restructuring, quantitative reduction in the way of restricting<br />
accreditation terms. Although, localization of the leading higher education<br />
objects remains basically unchanged.<br />
The same may be said about the reforms of the healthcare and social work<br />
system; Georgian Orthodox church, non-government and international<br />
organizations begin to play notable role in this system.<br />
Under Tbilisi conditions it’s very important to keep public spaces. As a result<br />
of unanalyzed and often crime like privatization, the part of such important<br />
elements of the city space as embankments, river channel and city square<br />
moved into the hands of the private capital. Most harmful was the privatization<br />
of such important for the city objects against the societal opinion, as Rikhis<br />
Ubani on the left embankment of the river Mtkvari, within the historical core of<br />
the city.<br />
Sport-recreational objects are suffering from the attacks of the builders. It’s<br />
already implementing or is starting building of such objects as the river Vere<br />
gorge, which was forming as the children city “Mziuri” in the Soviet period;<br />
Hippodrome of Tbilisi, stadium territory in Avlabari, etc. Tbilisi greenery is also<br />
under the pressure (residential house in Alexander garden, separating<br />
territories in the park of Vake and near wood-parks for the Embassies and<br />
Football Federation, construction of elite residential houses in Bagebi, etc.).<br />
Generally, may be said that Tbilisi now is in the transitional stage of getting<br />
familiar with modern social-economic conditions and relations of its functionalspatial<br />
organization and planning structure. Action in every particular case of<br />
urban development is an unique combination of multi and often subjective or<br />
contradictional factors. Following the maturing of the real estate market and<br />
generally market relations, Tbilisi spatial-territorial development, distribution of<br />
various functions, their restructuring and formation of modern body of the city<br />
will become more comprehensive, adequate and forecasting, what will finally<br />
maintain economic development of Tbilisi, as a large urban center.
As a result of social and economic transformation that has been taking place<br />
for the last few years in Georgia and the region Tbilisi is facing both new<br />
challenges and development opportunities. The analyses, surveys and<br />
discussions with stakeholders prove that:<br />
• the City economy has a major share in the Georgian gross national<br />
product,<br />
• the productivity of Tbilisi companies is higher than of the companies<br />
operating in other parts of Georgia,<br />
• Tbilisi labour market generates more well-paid jobs for highly qualified<br />
specialists than the other parts of Georgia,<br />
• the volume of local salaries creates the major consumption market in<br />
Georgia,<br />
• improved telecommunication infrastructure enhances Tbilisi’s links<br />
with the rest of the region and of the world,<br />
• Tbilisi has an attractive offer for various groups of visitors,<br />
• an increasing number of links with the region and the world attracts<br />
new firms and cooperators, improves competitiveness of the existing<br />
companies and introduces new market standards,<br />
• the development potential of Tbilisi encourages the growth of<br />
suburban areas thus creating the base for a metropolitan area,<br />
• the potential of companies operating in the growth sectors forces them<br />
to explore new markets in order to maintain development tendencies.<br />
The above findings are the basis for recommending measures to be taken in<br />
order to strengthen the position of Tbilisi as the service center for the region.<br />
The city attractiveness, the potential of local firms and the range of offered<br />
services, the quality of workforce and a multi cultural heritage enable Tbilisi to<br />
serve not only its metropolitan area and Georgia, but also the region of the<br />
Black and the Caspian Sea.<br />
The unfinished transformation of economy requires firms, employees and<br />
public institutions to adjust to the changing situation on the global markets.<br />
The City and other public institutions should support new forms of<br />
organisations and professional training and create space for new enterprises.<br />
One of the major conditions of local growth is to make the existing firms stay<br />
in the city and attract new investors from outside as well as to prevent present<br />
inhabitants from leaving the city and encourage others to come and settle<br />
down. The attractiveness of Tbilisi center, the quality of life or an easy start for<br />
companies are the project areas that should be supported and implemented<br />
directly by the City authorities.
The strength of local communities and the skills of local workforce outline the<br />
growth potential of Tbilisi. The City should get involved in:<br />
• strengthening local communities because it leads to better quality of<br />
life and to higher real property value in the residential areas,<br />
• making development opportunities equal for everybody in order to<br />
prevent large social groups from being excluded from the<br />
development mainstream,<br />
• support talented people because it is them who will decide about the<br />
future city potential.<br />
The cooperation of diverse partners is a key to success for many today’s<br />
enterprises. The City can play a coordinator and facilitator role in the dialogue<br />
and the cooperation of:<br />
• citizens,<br />
• social organisations,<br />
• firms,<br />
• public institutions,<br />
• various tiers of national government.<br />
In cooperation with national and foreign partners Tbilisi can strengthen its<br />
recognisability as a meeting, business, culture and science center. A City’s<br />
recognizable brand is one of the fundamental conditions to attract<br />
cooperators, investors and visitors.<br />
The table below presents alternative strategies, their aims as well as the<br />
strategy implementation objectives and potential activities.
Alternative<br />
Strategy implementation objectives Strategy implementation activities Strategy implementation<br />
strategies<br />
aim<br />
Tbilisi as regional<br />
center<br />
• Access to the places, people<br />
and initiatives,<br />
• Logistic hub,<br />
• Regional meeting place,<br />
• Tourism destination,<br />
• Forge cooperation with post<br />
industrial regional centers for mutual<br />
benefits<br />
Support organization of different kind of international meetings that<br />
will bring to Tbilisi people, businesses and ideas,<br />
Working with airport authority;<br />
• improve passenger services and connections with city<br />
center,<br />
• attract new carriers to include Tbilisi into their networks, with<br />
special focus on regional connections,<br />
In cooperation with other partners facilitate and assist in<br />
development of logistic center near airport and railway.<br />
Use marketing and public relations to promote Tbilisi to targeted<br />
industries and organizations,<br />
Develop tourism information system,<br />
Organize city tourism information office and Tbilisi convention and<br />
visitors bureau,<br />
Facilitate development of special sites that can be recognized<br />
worldwide,<br />
Attraction of targeted industries, commercial uses, headquarters,<br />
Initiate network of post soviet cities building knowledge based<br />
economies,<br />
Strengthen role of Tbilisi as<br />
regional hub organizing and<br />
attracting business, civic,<br />
political, scientific,<br />
entertainment, and sport<br />
activities and events. Locate in<br />
Tbilisi regional offices of<br />
business and institutions.<br />
Focus on change<br />
and competitiveness<br />
• Linking innovation to Tbilisi<br />
businesses,<br />
• Development of competitive<br />
Tbilisi clusters,<br />
• Provide space with assistance<br />
for start –ups,<br />
• Development of business<br />
environment institutions and services.<br />
Monitor and review city economic situation on annual basis,<br />
Identify products and services that will have the most competitive<br />
position at international markets,<br />
Conducting of business attitude surveys:<br />
• Cluster development needs<br />
• Stat –ups development needs<br />
Developed business<br />
environment for Tbilisi new<br />
economy.
• Technology transfer needs<br />
• Workforce development needs<br />
Development of cluster’s networks of most competitive sectors:<br />
• Tourism cluster<br />
• Creative cluster<br />
• Education and training cluster<br />
Provide electronic platform for e-business,<br />
Working with other public and private institutions facilitate and<br />
support through targeted public investment development of :<br />
• Business incubators<br />
• Industrial parks<br />
• Technology parks<br />
Support development of institutions providing financing to Tbilisi’s<br />
small and medium companies:<br />
• Grant and micro credits<br />
• Guaranties<br />
• Venture capital<br />
Assist start-ups and small medium companies :<br />
• Delivering needed information<br />
• Organizing trainings for managers<br />
• IT and Internet use ability for business purposes<br />
• Assistance in obtaining finances<br />
• Offering space to grow with assistance<br />
• Offering business consulting and mentoring<br />
Conducting economic missions for cluster partners to innovative<br />
regions,<br />
Organizing presentations at industry shows serving Tbilisi targeted<br />
industries,
Marketing Tbilisi<br />
livable city and<br />
convenient for<br />
business<br />
• Invest in City Center,<br />
• Invest in housing districts,<br />
• Offer a space for different<br />
size businesses,<br />
• Invest in commercial corridors,<br />
• Invest in development zones,<br />
• Concentrate public investment<br />
to facilitate private development,<br />
Development of various publications (electronic and typed versions):<br />
• Companies and investment projects important for Tbilisi<br />
• Tbilisi conference abilities<br />
• Tbilisi successful companies<br />
• Map of Tbilisi most important businesses<br />
• Tbilisi – place where it is possible to do business<br />
Firms – creators of Tbilisi brand<br />
Identify, protect and serve with technical infrastructure areas for new<br />
functions within city territory that are crucial for city development:<br />
• Different kinds of housing<br />
• Public services<br />
• Transit<br />
• Offices<br />
• Retail<br />
• Hotels and restaurants<br />
• Entertainment<br />
• Recreational areas<br />
• Industries<br />
• Warehousing and logistic<br />
• Research and development,<br />
Support improvement of existing features in the city center that can<br />
attract tourists,<br />
Stimulate broad band internet access for businesses and citizens in<br />
the city area,<br />
Seek funding for preservation and rehabilitation of historic facilities,<br />
Facilitate service and transit oriented development around rail and<br />
metro stations,<br />
Identify and support development of commercial corridors serving<br />
<br />
Attract new businesses,<br />
institutions and residents to<br />
the city, as well as retain those<br />
who are already living or<br />
working in Tbilisi. Revitalize<br />
deprived city areas. Create<br />
identity of different districts and<br />
neighborhoods.
People power Tbilisi<br />
economy<br />
• Strong local communities,<br />
• Improve economic inclusion to<br />
enable all citizens to fulfil their<br />
potential,<br />
• Workforce development,<br />
• Invest in talents.<br />
with retail and commercial services Tbilisi living districts:<br />
• Conduct research to identify market needs and prepare<br />
business recruitment strategy for each commercial zone<br />
• Establish land use regulations<br />
• Provide targeted public investment<br />
• Coordinate public services within the area<br />
Promote housing and mixed use development in commercial<br />
corridors,<br />
Identify and support revitalization of development zones that will<br />
provide space for new commercial and public initiatives through:<br />
• zoning<br />
• targeted public investment,<br />
Continue activities to promote redevelopment of post industrial<br />
areas,<br />
Support renovation of city public and private cultural, and<br />
recreational facilities at the neighborhood level,<br />
Enhance the position of Tbilisi retail services,<br />
Monitor Tbilisi labour market developments and changes on the<br />
annual basis,<br />
Conducting surveys of youth professional potentials and aspirations,<br />
Identifying partners and donors, working on issues of vocational<br />
trainings,<br />
<br />
Develop employee skills to<br />
meet demand of labour market<br />
and offer all citizens equal<br />
chances to participate in<br />
economic, social, political,
Survey how economy is developing, what kind of work places are<br />
created, what kind of qualification people will be needed,<br />
Facilitate development of career development paths for most needed<br />
professions,<br />
Develop labour market information system with internet portal,<br />
Assist schools and other educational institutions serving youth to<br />
make ICT technology and language skills a priority.<br />
Support efforts of schools, training institutions and employment<br />
service providers to prepare citizens for employment opportunities.<br />
Facilitate cooperation of targeted industries with schools and<br />
universities,<br />
Organize city job and education fairs on annual basis:<br />
• Employers will present job opportunities and conditions<br />
• Consultations for pupils graduating from school on choosing<br />
jobs and professional careers,<br />
• Providing information on where and what can they study,<br />
• New professions emerging at labor market,<br />
• Information on scholarships and grants for students and<br />
pupils,<br />
• Trainings in writing CV, preparing for interviews,<br />
Organize financial support for best pupils and students,<br />
Award best pupils achievements,<br />
Support vocational training and life long learning initiatives providing<br />
assistance to mature workforce,<br />
Develop assistance for low skilled people and youth at risk disabled<br />
people that will create work opportunities for those groups,<br />
<br />
cultural activities of Tbilisi<br />
community.
Brand Tbilisi as a<br />
place where you can<br />
be understood and<br />
supported<br />
• Improve coordination of<br />
different partners to maximize<br />
economic growth,<br />
• Business, engaged in<br />
development project,<br />
• Different tires of public<br />
administration involved in strategy<br />
implementation.<br />
• City administration works as<br />
coordinator and facilitator of<br />
development initiatives.<br />
Organize City Development Council with business, social and<br />
political leaders advising Mayor of Tbilisi on city development<br />
objectives,<br />
Organize City Development Council with business, social and<br />
political leaders,<br />
Conduct platform for discussion and coordination of metropolitan<br />
issues,<br />
Organize and facilitate Education – Business Round Table,<br />
Institutionalize community based programs offering organizational<br />
and financial support for local communes revitalizing their<br />
neighborhoods,<br />
Improvement of qualifications and attitude of local government staff:<br />
• Creating group directly operating with business and raising<br />
its qualifications<br />
• Creating group operating with investors and raising its<br />
qualifications<br />
• Periodic publication presenting office’s services<br />
<br />
Institutionalize cooperation<br />
with:<br />
• Local communities,<br />
• Businesses,<br />
• Neighboring municipalities,<br />
• Other public institutions
When creating long-lasting mechanisms of activities stimulating local<br />
economy it is a matter of fundamental value to find a partner institution who<br />
will initiate and coordinate development programmes.<br />
The local government needs partners not only among ordinary people,<br />
institutions and organisations in the City but should also find external partners<br />
such as banks, regional authorities and business organisations who can offer<br />
help in developing local job market.<br />
When implementing the economic development strategy for Tbilisi the<br />
following measures will be of key importance:<br />
• cooperation among the stakeholders,<br />
• establishing a municipal structure that is capable of generating and<br />
implementing local economic policy,<br />
• identification of priority projects being the foundation of local economic<br />
development,<br />
• starting cooperation with other cities that are undergoing the process<br />
of similar transformation by means of best practices,<br />
• encouraging local economic growth, which is such form of activity that<br />
requires specific skills and initiatives that are beyond the city hall’s<br />
traditional forms of activity.<br />
An important role in strategy implementation can be played by efficient<br />
Economic Development Agencies.<br />
It is worth consideration that in the course of strategy implementation the<br />
Tbilisi City Hall department dealing with economic development could be<br />
transformed into an independent city agency provided with resources<br />
necessary to carry out strategy tasks.<br />
The Agency should:<br />
• employ a team of experts capable of project implementation,<br />
• develop a range of instruments to support companies and workforce,<br />
• have at their disposal the funds enabling them to realize tasks by<br />
means of their own earnings and subsidies for projects.<br />
A non-governmental organisation that is competent to perform such tasks,<br />
has adequate human technical and financial resources will secure sustained<br />
activity and will immediately react to changing conditions.<br />
When developing the Economic Development Strategy of Tbilisi City a<br />
workshop was held where the participants learned how to establish an NGO<br />
(foundation, association) and how to develop with local partners the local<br />
operation programme, methods and forms of raising funds for operation and<br />
project implementation.<br />
Below the most important projects have been presented whose scopes and<br />
subjects result directly from the entrepreneurs’ opinion. The projects were<br />
developed during the workshop meetings with stakeholders and they deal<br />
with: workforce, business activity financing, organising business activity<br />
space, application of new technologies in economic development, support for<br />
tourism and creative clusters.
SME support projects<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
• <br />
• <br />
• <br />
• <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
• <br />
• <br />
• <br />
•
.
- <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
- <br />
<br />
- <br />
- <br />
-
• <br />
• <br />
• <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
-
-
-
-
Tourism development projects<br />
<br />
Tourist Information centre ( TIC )
Tourism development projects<br />
<br />
Tourist Information centre ( TIC )
Tourism development projects<br />
<br />
Tourist Information centre ( TIC )
− <br />
<br />
− <br />
<br />
<br />
• <br />
• <br />
• <br />
• <br />
• <br />
•
− <br />
<br />
− <br />
<br />
<br />
• <br />
• <br />
• <br />
• <br />
• <br />
•
Workforce development projects<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
- <br />
- <br />
- <br />
- <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
- <br />
<br />
- <br />
- <br />
<br />
<br />
- <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
- <br />
- <br />
-
-<br />
-
-<br />
<br />
-<br />
-<br />
<br />
<br />
-
-<br />
<br />
-<br />
-<br />
<br />
<br />
-
- <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
-
<strong>LOCAL</strong><br />
<strong>ECONOMIC</strong><br />
<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />
<strong>PLAN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>TBILISI</strong><br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
EFFECTIVE STRATEGY<br />
IMPLEMENTATION<br />
METHODOLOGIES<br />
Tbilisi City Hall │ Economic Policy Agency<br />
Address: 2, Liberty Sq │ Tbilisi 0105, Georgia<br />
Tel.:(+99532)932314 │ Fax.:(+99532)932895<br />
E-Mail: economic@tbilisi.gov.ge<br />
www.tbilisi.gov.ge<br />
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................4<br />
1. Strategic management framework and the city competitiveness.........................................................5<br />
2. Integration of strategic management framework.....................................................................................7<br />
3. Strategy implementation methodological guidelines ...........................................................................13<br />
3.1. Partners participating in the plan development process.......................................................................14<br />
3.2. Process of writing the Corporate City Development Plan ....................................................................15<br />
3.2.1. Organization of teams dealing with the Plan development...........................................................15<br />
3.2.2. Plan development process phases – the first edition....................................................................15<br />
3.3. Methodology of updating the Corporate City Development Plan.........................................................17<br />
3.3.1. Principal conditions for updating.....................................................................................................17<br />
3.3.2. Cyclic activities ................................................................................................................................17<br />
3.3.3. Timetable.........................................................................................................................................19<br />
3.3.4. Summing-up....................................................................................................................................20<br />
4. Strategy implementation tools ..................................................................................................................21<br />
4.1. Corporate City Development Plan - responsibilities of involved partners...........................................23<br />
4.2. Corporate City Development Plan – timeframe ....................................................................................24<br />
4.3. Programs card.........................................................................................................................................25<br />
4.4. Projects card ...........................................................................................................................................27<br />
4.5. Project feasibility study ...........................................................................................................................28<br />
5. Appendix – Directive of the Mayor of Tbilisi on up dating and implementation of the<br />
Strategy Implementation Plan for Tbilisi .................................................................................................33<br />
2
CHARTS<br />
Chart 2-1 City strategy structure....................................................................................................................................................8<br />
Chart 2-2 Integrated strategic management framework...........................................................................................................10<br />
Chart 4-1 Strategy Implementation Plan.....................................................................................................................................22<br />
TABLES<br />
Table 4-1 Corporate City Development Plan - responsibilities of involved partners. ...........................................................23<br />
Table 4-2 Corporate City Development Plan – timetable.......................................................................................................24<br />
3
Introduction<br />
Today, when the pace of economic changes has accelerated, it is necessary<br />
to take advantage of this experience and work out such an instrument that will<br />
enhance the application of city economic development methods coordinated<br />
with overall city and national development strategies.<br />
The presented proposal satisfies this need since it deals with such<br />
organisation and procedures of integrated management that combine longterm<br />
strategy goals with medium-term implementation objectives as well as<br />
with individual projects and current local government tasks. Moreover, it is an<br />
impulse to mobilise all the groups interested in conscious and active creation<br />
of local development programs and their implementation.<br />
It seems obvious that such activity should be of permanent nature. Therefore<br />
it is necessary to institutionalise Corporate City Development Plan (CCDP) as<br />
integration platform for city strategic management framework and tool for<br />
successful strategy implementation. Corporate City Development Plan is a<br />
mid-term plan updated annually for next three – five years and consists of<br />
different projects generated within sectoral strategies that support city<br />
strategic gaols and objectives. Corporate plan it also a tool for integration of<br />
strategy with city annual budget.<br />
Local Economic Development (<strong>LED</strong>) plan is on of sectoral strategies that play<br />
key role in city development programming. When the <strong>LED</strong> gaols and<br />
objectives are agreed and priority projects identified, they can be incorporated<br />
into CCDP financed from city budget. Integration of strategic management<br />
framework and efficient cooperation of all involved partners is possible when:<br />
• CCDP development process is defined and formalized on annual<br />
basis<br />
• CCDP development process is synchronized with preparation of city<br />
budget, investment and mid-term financial plan<br />
• all partners and their responsibilities in the process are defined<br />
• standardized tolls are used by all partners and sectoral programs to<br />
prepare strategy implementation projects<br />
• selection criteria should be based on city development objectives so<br />
all sectoral programs will follow city strategy aims.<br />
Report strength the role of efficient management for city competitiveness<br />
position, presents conditions of integrated management framework as well as<br />
methodology of Corporate City Development Plan. Special tools of successful<br />
strategy implementation system are presented at the end of report.<br />
4
1. Strategic management framework and the city competitiveness<br />
Cities are now competing at both a national and international level to attract<br />
investment, citizens as well as visitors.<br />
Where globalization has had a positive effect in stimulating economic growth,<br />
these benefits have not been evenly distributed. Cities therefore continue to<br />
experience problems of poverty and inequality. In developing cities these<br />
problems are compounded by urbanization which has led to problems of<br />
unemployment, the proliferation of informal settlements and environmental<br />
degradation. All cities have to face challenges because of:<br />
1. economy transformation from the traditional to new knowledge based<br />
economy<br />
2. limited revenue capacity of companies, citizens and local<br />
governments<br />
3. movement of people and businesses<br />
4. suburbanization and poverty in central areas<br />
5. need of new education following workforce development demand<br />
And last but not list there is huge pressure to change city government roles<br />
and management methodologies to follow all these changes and challenges.<br />
Since the 1980s there have been increasing efforts to introduce new<br />
management methodologies to city administrations. Different solutions were<br />
exercised in different countries but two issues were key elements of new<br />
systems:<br />
1. strategic planning methodology when new strategies and polices were<br />
developed<br />
2. integration of strategic management framework to coordinate all<br />
sectoral plans and different partners involved in a timeframe<br />
Transformation require efficient management to follow all changes, to face<br />
challenges and to utilize resources efficiently. It's universally known that<br />
better performing cities and those recognized as skilfully managed are more<br />
attractive for new businesses. Although there is a lack of comparative<br />
standards with which to measure whether a city is well performing and<br />
assess key drivers of high performance, it is obvious that ability to cope with<br />
5
change, leadership and vision shown by city representatives, its economic,<br />
social and cultural diversity as well as its ability to make effective use of<br />
human capital are the conditioning foundations of high performing city.<br />
There are of cities that present high performance which are not<br />
geographically centrally located and are not national capital cities. There is no<br />
single model for creating high performing cities. Examples cited included<br />
places as varied as market driven American cities like San Jose, supported by<br />
government Asiatic cities as Singapore and somewhere in between the<br />
European cities such as Dublin, Barcelona or Scandinavian cities. High<br />
performance can be achieved under a variety of governance arrangements,<br />
but usually results in high quality of life, better infrastructure and favorable<br />
business environment with skilled workforce.<br />
The fact that some sectors achieve a critical mass in a city may be more<br />
important than<br />
the location of a city itself. San Jose’s global position in the research and<br />
commercialization of new technologies is not based on its location but on the<br />
fact that this sector demonstrates a high degree of clustering and innovation,<br />
which makes the city attractive to the others.<br />
There are some obstacles on the way to a well managed competitive city that<br />
should be taken into a count:<br />
1. the importance of developing effective metropolitan policies and engaging<br />
in long term spatial planning,<br />
2. new strategies require strong civic leadership and vision to convince<br />
public to changes,<br />
3. weak citizen participation is a current and future problem and may result<br />
in declining identification with governance structures and policies,<br />
4. coordination and cooperation between different levels (region,<br />
neighborhood) , sectors and partners (public, private and community<br />
organizations or decision makers, professionals and stakeholders),<br />
5. the question how far local government should be involved in local<br />
economy.<br />
These and other important issues should be discussed with a local<br />
stakeholders at the beginning when the framework is constructed. The<br />
agreement will create boundaries for all policies and define public role in city<br />
development activities.<br />
6
2. Integration of strategic management framework<br />
Cities operate on the basis of different legal regulations that define city<br />
responsibilities and polices which articulate community goals. The city<br />
development strategy (CDS) covers community long term vision, gaols,<br />
objectives and is the guideline for all city development activities. While the<br />
cities operate not only as basic municipal services supplier but they are more<br />
and more active as a coordinator and active partner in all initiatives important<br />
for the city development, we are in the situation that many other programs are<br />
also developed to coordinate joint activities within different sectors. Local<br />
economic development ( <strong>LED</strong>) programs are the examples of local<br />
government leaders with stakeholders assessing economic competitiveness<br />
of the city and defining goals and tasks that should be undertaken. It is<br />
important to integrate strategies on the level of aims, but it is even more<br />
important and much more difficult to find the way that <strong>LED</strong> strategy<br />
implementation can be incorporated into CDS implementation process.<br />
All strategies are developed on the basis of strategic planning methodology.<br />
While some tools and procedures specific for a given sector can be used,<br />
basic elements of strategy development process are similar:<br />
• organization,<br />
• competitive assessment,<br />
• strategy formulation,<br />
• strategy implementation,<br />
• strategy monitoring and review.<br />
The <strong>LED</strong> strategic planning methodology that was implemented within World<br />
Bank’s Cities of Change program can be fully utilized for Tbilisi purpose. The<br />
methodology was based on a five-stage process:<br />
• organizing effort,<br />
• doing the competitive assessment,<br />
• preparing the strategy,<br />
• implementation of the strategy,<br />
• developing the monitoring and evaluation system.<br />
7
Chart 2-1 City strategy structure<br />
VISION<br />
STRATEGIC GOALS<br />
G G G<br />
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES<br />
Projects<br />
PROGRA<br />
PROGRAM 2<br />
PROGRAM 3<br />
PROGRAM<br />
Additionally, the method gives access to well tested tools of cooperation with<br />
stakeholders, to analyses and prognoses, to problem identification and<br />
structuring of goals, objectives and programs, to the identification and<br />
prioritizing of projects, their management and financing and, finally, to strategy<br />
evaluation and to reaching anticipated objectives.<br />
8
On that common basis the city management framework can be build.<br />
The following assumptions of the integrated strategic management system<br />
condition its success:<br />
• the vision and the objectives of the local community have been<br />
identified;<br />
• the process of development planning is fuelled by the needs and<br />
preferences of social partners and service receivers;<br />
• the management system is based on translating the strategy vision<br />
and objectives into the implementation plan priorities and the results of<br />
the completed projects;<br />
• responsibilities are fairly shared by politicians, professional and social<br />
partners;<br />
• institutional development is based on a step-by-step process and<br />
implementation plans are updated annually;<br />
• the indices of projects implementation are based on strategic<br />
objectives and on social expectations;<br />
• the effective monitoring and updating system is based on a repeatable<br />
process;<br />
• the annual budget preparations and the plan of strategy<br />
implementation are fully integrated;<br />
• the system of project management and inter-sector groups work has<br />
been implemented;<br />
• personal responsibilities have been defined and the staff training<br />
system has been implemented.<br />
Taking into account that strategic planning process starts from long term<br />
vision and step down to operational everyday tasks and services, three levels<br />
of the system should be identified:<br />
• Long-term strategy/policy planning framework.<br />
• Mid-term strategy implementation framework.<br />
• Operational task/service management framework.<br />
9
Chart 2-2 Integrated strategic management framework<br />
INTEGRATED STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK<br />
STRATEGIC<br />
<strong>PLAN</strong>NING<br />
FRAMEWORK<br />
STRATEGY<br />
IMPLEMENTATION<br />
FRAMEWORK<br />
OPERATIONAL<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
FRAMEWORK<br />
CITY<br />
STRATEGY<br />
CITY<br />
SECTORAL<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
CORPORATE CITY<br />
<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />
<strong>PLAN</strong><br />
4-6 YEARS<br />
SERVICE<br />
<strong>PLAN</strong>S<br />
2-3 YEARS<br />
ANNUAL<br />
SERVICE<br />
DEPARTMENTAL<br />
<strong>PLAN</strong>S<br />
CAPITAL<br />
IMPROVEMENT<br />
<strong>PLAN</strong><br />
4-6 YEARS<br />
CITY<br />
BUDGET<br />
FINANCIAL <strong>PLAN</strong><br />
6-8 YEARS<br />
Strategy planning level consists of city development strategy (CDS) and other<br />
sectoral strategies. Mid-term strategy implementation framework consists of<br />
service plans following sectoral strategies, a capital improvement plan (CIP), a<br />
mid-term financial plan (FP) and a city corporate development plan (CCDP).<br />
That is the integration platform for different sectoral objectives with city longterm<br />
goals (CDS) and financial and technical possibilities (CIP and FP). The<br />
operational level is based on a city budget (CB) and consists of annual<br />
departmental service plans.<br />
Effective strategic management of local government, requires coordinated<br />
planning and monitoring systems that enable key decision makers, both<br />
political and<br />
10
managerial, to take action based on facts about performance. Performance<br />
management can also be thought of as a tool to help link and underpin the<br />
initiatives that make up the<br />
modernization agenda. Following from the policy development cycle, there are<br />
three areas where indicators can assist local authorities in addressing the<br />
challenges faced by cities. These are:<br />
• developing appropriate policies with clear goals and strategies,<br />
• monitoring the performance and reporting progress of local<br />
governments implementing strategies,<br />
• reviewing policies and strategies.<br />
Since the goals of urban policy cut across different sectors, and should reflect<br />
changes of different level of the strategic management framework (from<br />
project results to strategy aims) the indicators will be of four types:<br />
• Input indicators. Inputs are the resources allocated to specific tasks, such<br />
as the amount of money spent or the total number of employee/hours<br />
needed to deliver a service or project,<br />
• Output indicators. These reflect the quantity of products or units of service<br />
provided to the population,<br />
• Outcome indicators. These measures report the results of programs and<br />
services or relate to the quality of the service e.g. measures of customer<br />
satisfaction,<br />
• Impact indicators. These assess long term quality changes that strategy<br />
implementation activities create in the city changing living conditions or<br />
improving business environment.<br />
When designing monitoring system in practice, specific indicators should be<br />
identified and allocated for specific deliverables. Starting from the bottom of<br />
framework we have projects. Their results can be assessed by means of<br />
output indicators. Programs grouping a similar projects can be reviewed with<br />
outcome indicators. Impact indicators can be designated to strategy objectives<br />
and goals. Such a solution will support integration of the whole strategic<br />
management framework and will work in both directions top-down and<br />
bottom-up. When developing strategy implementation activities (coming down<br />
11
from strategy goals and objectives) it will help to select right projects<br />
supporting realization of the strategy concrete aims. Monitoring and reviewing<br />
strategy results we can assess how specific projects and programs<br />
participate in the upper level strategy deliverables.<br />
Each indicator should be defined according to the specific result it is allocated<br />
to. When the indicator is measured it should be also be agreed what is its<br />
baseline and what targets should be achieved in a frame of strategy<br />
implementation plan.<br />
12
3. Strategy implementation methodological guidelines<br />
This chapter contains information about the organisation, principles and<br />
procedures of writing the first and subsequent Corporate City Development<br />
Plans. In this area it is crucial to create procedures of efficient communication,<br />
to specify personal responsibility and to activate social and business groups. It<br />
is also important to approach the Plan as the principal management tool. It is<br />
worth pointing out that it is necessary to verify the procedures and rules<br />
applied in the process of writing and implementing the Plan. Thanks to the<br />
conclusions drawn from such an evaluation subsequent editions of the Plan<br />
can be improved.<br />
The chapter also includes the descriptions of organisation, procedures and<br />
institutional solutions needed when updating the Plan. Surprisingly, this<br />
process turns out to be equally challenging as the works on the initial edition.<br />
The authors should stay away from routine solutions so that they can remain<br />
innovative and avoid failure when starting new projects.<br />
An important rule when implementing the Plan is to follow closely the adopted<br />
procedures and make sure that everyone does their job. The principle idea of<br />
this proposal is permanent analysing and drawing conclusions from<br />
completed tasks because they form the foundation for future projects.<br />
13
3.1. Partners participating in the plan development process<br />
Generally understood social and economic development is the principal<br />
strategic objective of every commune as well as it is in the best interest of each<br />
individual. So, since the plan was to be written with the participation of all the<br />
concerned the partners who represented various interests and capabilities had<br />
to be selected very carefully. Such type of cooperation is the basis of the<br />
participation method which is considered to be highly effective.<br />
At the same time the success in writing a good plan depended on such<br />
allocation of competences that enabled experts to deal with analytic and<br />
conceptual work, while politicians and social partners could express their<br />
preferences in decision-making.<br />
The list of the participants in the Plan development process consisted of the<br />
representatives of:<br />
• the City residents,<br />
• key business groups,<br />
• public institutions in charge of local development,<br />
• self-government officials, local politicians,<br />
• non-governmental organisations – especially the social and economic<br />
ones.<br />
Also, specialists, outside consultants took part in the works.<br />
Local administration has to nominate the Plan coordinator. The Mayor of the<br />
City himself and through delegated specialists is responsible for the formal<br />
organisation and the Plan preparation. He is also in charge of logistics and the<br />
subject-matter side of the process.<br />
14
3.2. Process of writing the Corporate City Development Plan<br />
3.2.1. Organization of teams dealing with the Plan development<br />
In the process the works of preparatory and conceptual character were<br />
separated from the decision-making at different stages of the Plan<br />
development.<br />
The team organisation and the allocation of tasks were based on the rule that<br />
the selected groups of specialists performed all the works that required<br />
professional skills according to the best practice principle. The teams<br />
selected in such a way could quickly come to common conclusions. It should<br />
be emphasised how vast the range of problems addressed in the Plan was.<br />
The ability to synthesize problems is very useful in this process. Decision<br />
makers and stakeholders are not involved in document preparatory works -<br />
stakeholders consult The Mayor and City Council before they will take final<br />
decisions. Detailed tasks and harmonogram of work is presented later in the<br />
next chapter.<br />
By the City Mayor directive the following teams should be appointed to<br />
develop the Plan:<br />
• The City Development Council – stakeholder group,<br />
• Inter-sector Team of City Development Programme,<br />
• Working Team.<br />
3.2.2. Plan development process phases – the first edition<br />
Phase One – team organisation and procedure adopting:<br />
• appointing the Plan Working Team,<br />
• appointing the Inter-sector Plan Team,<br />
• appointing the City Development Council,<br />
• creating the consulting group,<br />
• adopting the Plan development procedure,<br />
• selecting techniques and instruments to carry out the works,<br />
• adopting a detailed schedule of the Plan development.<br />
15
Phase Two – the assessment of the development and competitiveness level<br />
of the City as the centre of entrepreneurship that provides its residents high<br />
quality of life:<br />
• collecting and processing information about the condition and<br />
perspectives of local development, including a series of surveys,<br />
• the analysis of the City’s condition in key areas,<br />
• the analysis of the City Development Strategy and <strong>LED</strong> program<br />
implementation results,<br />
• writing reports about the analyses,<br />
• conducting the SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities<br />
and threats), identifying key problems and defining development<br />
priorities.<br />
Phase three – the Plan development:<br />
• the review of strategic objectives<br />
• defining the Plan implementation indices (input, output, outcome and<br />
impact) as the basis of the monitoring system of the city development<br />
strategy implementation,<br />
• adopting the subject-matter material scope of the Plan, including the<br />
initial list of the strategic implementation projects.<br />
Phase four – preparing the Plan document, consultations and the approval:<br />
• gathering implementation projects, their assessment and selection,<br />
• preparing the draft Plan document,<br />
• presentation, consultations and modifications of the draft,<br />
• adopting the resolution by the City Council.<br />
16
3.3. Methodology of updating the Corporate City Development Plan<br />
As it has been mentioned before, the resolution concerning the Corporate City<br />
Development - the document of a strategic character - should not end the<br />
cooperation among partners involved in its realisation.<br />
3.3.1. Principal conditions for updating<br />
The Working and Inter-sector Teams as well as the City Development Council<br />
take over the responsibility for the Plan implementation and for its updating.<br />
The Council should play the role of a main consultative body for the Mayor<br />
and the City Council of Tbilisi in the process of updating the Plan.<br />
The conditions under which the adequate updating system will be applied<br />
strongly determine formal and organisational activities, define the Plan’s<br />
characteristics and regulate the Plan development works:<br />
• step-by-step character – updated annually,<br />
• duration 3– 5 years,<br />
• working on the Plan by means of standardised forms,<br />
• accurate and clear criteria of the implementation projects selection,<br />
• application of IT tools to create and update database,<br />
• sensitivity to changes in social and economic situation as well as in<br />
legal regulations,<br />
• stable procedures, instruments and collective bodies (the teams, the<br />
Council), consultations.<br />
3.3.2. Cyclic activities<br />
The updating should be performed annually – having in mind that not all the<br />
data will change in a yearly cycle.<br />
Phase I<br />
The cycle starts with collecting necessary information about the level of social<br />
and economic development, the strategy implementation and accompanying<br />
phenomena. This phase also includes surveys in business and social groups.<br />
Naturally, the more data is collected, the more reasonable further steps are. At<br />
this stage it is vital to determine the cycles at which individual data will be<br />
collected and to identify the sources where they can be found.<br />
17
Phase II<br />
As in every strategic programming process what should follow next is the<br />
analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and external threats the City<br />
has to face. It is a task that requires from the members of the Inter-sector<br />
Team a lot of effort and professionalism. The natural outcome of this analysis<br />
is the identification of key problems for Tbilisi development. Then, a<br />
conceptual work begins in order to decide on the ways of solving these<br />
problems, to define the priorities. These activities are performed by the Intersector<br />
Team of the City Development Programme and the City Development<br />
Council who define the development directions and recommend development<br />
priorities to the President of the City.<br />
Before the priorities are approved, the President consults the City Council<br />
commissions, local community and selected organisations.<br />
Phase III<br />
After the consultation the adopted priorities are publicly announced, which is<br />
an invitation to submit proposals of implementation projects. It is vital that the<br />
announcement of the priority development directions is addressed to all<br />
organisations and public administration institutions that are interested in<br />
implementing various projects within the announced priorities. The proposed<br />
implementation projects are submitted on standardized forms to the Working<br />
Team whose task is to compare the projects. Then the Working Team<br />
evaluates and selects the proposals. The evaluation and selection criteria are<br />
first of all based on their efficiency in implementing the adopted priorities and<br />
how well they are prepared. Then the shortlist is made of the ones that deal<br />
with the major strategic issues. After consultations with the City Council the list<br />
is eventually approved by the President.<br />
18
Phase IV<br />
The announcement of the list of the approved projects is the signal for the<br />
bidders to send application forms. The standardized forms helps to evaluate<br />
projects by comparing their main elements and to remain impartial. The<br />
applications are then analysed by the Plan Inter-sector Team who finally<br />
approves the projects that will contribute to working out the draft Corporate<br />
City Development Plan for Tbilisi based on the implementation objectives of<br />
the City Development Strategy. The Working Team writes the final version of<br />
the Plan.<br />
Then the President of the City consults various organisations and submits the<br />
Plan for the City Council’s approval.<br />
The implementation of the Plan requires a great deal of effort from all the<br />
participants. The course of implementation is monitored and continually<br />
adjusted due to changing conditions and unforeseen events.<br />
3.3.3. Timetable<br />
Every cycle begins with evaluation and gathering information about the<br />
economic and social situation in Tbilisi. All these elements are repeated.<br />
Professional evaluation of the City situation not only helps to identify the key<br />
problems to be solved in the next edition of the Plan, but also defines the<br />
needs of the opinion-making groups. It is easier to choose the best ways of<br />
public intervention if the conclusions from the analysis (the survey, statistical<br />
data analysis) are correct.<br />
As it has been mentioned, the Corporate City Development Plans should be<br />
developed in yearly cycles. When deciding when the works should commence<br />
it is reasonable to take into consideration the City budget procedure and<br />
reporting dates. It is important to remember about the deadlines of<br />
applications to financial institutions and organisations supporting<br />
implementation projects.<br />
Therefore, if the starting and final date of procedure is to be chosen well, it is<br />
important to take into consideration all these elements.<br />
19
3.3.4. Summing-up<br />
When updating the Corporate City development Plan it is crucial to continue<br />
the assumptions of its first edition. It is important to focus on the analysis of<br />
changes and the development strategy implementation level as well to draw<br />
right conclusions. It gives the opportunity to confirm that the adopted priorities<br />
are correct or modify them with due consideration. It also enables the<br />
authorities to eliminate less valuable projects.<br />
Additionally, it seems important that all the system participants avoid routine<br />
because it could adversely affect not only the Plan, but also hinder social<br />
participation.<br />
It is also worth emphasising that consulting each year the priorities of the<br />
Corporate City Development Plan with social partners encourages all parties<br />
willing to participate in its implementation process to submit their proposals.<br />
The participation of social partners in the process makes it possible to apply<br />
the „multidimensional selection” method that is used when choosing priority<br />
projects when the decision is made by a group of delegates who are<br />
representative for a local community.<br />
20
4. Strategy implementation tools<br />
21
MAYOR<br />
AND<br />
CITY COUNCIL<br />
Chart 4-1 Strategy Implementation Plan<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
<strong>FOR</strong><br />
NEW PERIODS<br />
<strong>PLAN</strong><br />
STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK<br />
APPROVAL<br />
OF<br />
<strong>PLAN</strong><br />
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT <strong>PLAN</strong><br />
<strong>LOCAL</strong> TAXES AND FEES<br />
BUDGET<br />
DEPARTAMENTAL SERVICE <strong>PLAN</strong>S<br />
PERSONAL TARGETS<br />
STAKEHOLDERS<br />
GROUP<br />
INTER<br />
DEPARTAMENTAL<br />
TEAM<br />
RECOMEN<br />
DATION OF<br />
PRIORITY<br />
ACTIONS<br />
Q1<br />
STRATEGY<br />
REVIEW<br />
AND<br />
KEY<br />
ISSUE<br />
IDENTY<br />
FICATION<br />
CONSULTATION<br />
OF<br />
DRAFT <strong>PLAN</strong><br />
DRAFT<br />
<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />
OF<br />
Q2 PROJECTS<br />
APPLICA<br />
Q3 Q4<br />
TIONS<br />
<strong>FOR</strong>MULATI<br />
ON OF<br />
DRAFT<br />
<strong>PLAN</strong><br />
WORKING<br />
TEAM<br />
STARTEG<br />
IMPLEMENT<br />
ATION<br />
REPORT<br />
AND SOCIAL<br />
<strong>ECONOMIC</strong><br />
ANALYSES<br />
COLLECTION<br />
AND<br />
REVIEW<br />
OF PROJECT<br />
APLICA<br />
TIONS<br />
22
4.1. Corporate City Development Plan - responsibilities of involved partners<br />
Table 4-1 Corporate City Development Plan - responsibilities of involved partners.<br />
Working team Inter department team Stakeholder Group<br />
Main task<br />
Logistic and organizational<br />
assistance for the process.<br />
As time goes by, members of<br />
the team should play more<br />
important role as professional<br />
specialists.<br />
Detailed tasks<br />
Constructing and updating city<br />
socio-economic database.<br />
Conducting strategy monitoring<br />
process – analyses of<br />
achieved targets (versus<br />
identified measures and<br />
indicators) and community<br />
survey.<br />
Technical preparations<br />
organization of all meetings,<br />
consultations.<br />
Participation in all meetings<br />
and consultations.<br />
Preparation of TOR’s and<br />
contracting external<br />
consultants.<br />
Key issues identification,<br />
Focusing on plan concept and<br />
presentations of draft plan<br />
before the Stakeholder Group<br />
Review of the materials<br />
prepared by working team and<br />
consultants<br />
SWOT Analysis<br />
Identification of key issues and<br />
recommendation of priorities.<br />
Measures and indicators for<br />
strategic objectives.<br />
Discussion on and initial<br />
approval of the strategy<br />
implementation draft Plan.<br />
Participation in further<br />
consultations and approval<br />
process.<br />
Discussion on the key issues;<br />
identification of priorities for<br />
coming period consultations<br />
and final approval of the draft<br />
Plan<br />
Discussion on analysis<br />
results.<br />
Review of objectives for<br />
coming planning period.<br />
Discussion on the draft Plan<br />
recommendation of<br />
necessary changes.<br />
Consultations of the draft<br />
plan with the community.<br />
Approval of the final draft plan<br />
and presentation of the plan<br />
to the Mayor and The City<br />
Council.<br />
23
4.2. Corporate City Development Plan – timeframe<br />
Table 4-2 Corporate City Development Plan – timetable<br />
The First Stage The Second Stage The Third Stage The Fourth Stage<br />
Strategy monitoring,<br />
competitive<br />
assessment<br />
Key issues<br />
identification and<br />
strategic objectives<br />
review<br />
Projects selection<br />
Formulation of<br />
Strategy,<br />
Implementation Plan;<br />
Business attitude<br />
survey, Youth<br />
aspirations and<br />
professional career<br />
opportunities survey,<br />
Quality of live survey.<br />
Information about<br />
strategy<br />
implementation plan<br />
results.<br />
A report on current<br />
economic and social<br />
situation. Pointing out<br />
changes in respect to<br />
the previous edition of<br />
the report with<br />
strategic and specific<br />
performance<br />
indicators.<br />
Evaluation of Plan<br />
implementation in the<br />
previous year.<br />
Pointing out<br />
tendencies<br />
Assessment city<br />
competitive position.<br />
Review of measures<br />
and indicators of<br />
implementation plan<br />
objectives.<br />
Announcement of<br />
project request<br />
conditions.<br />
Collection and review<br />
of projects requests.<br />
Evaluation of the<br />
projects according to<br />
implementation plan<br />
objectives.<br />
Identification of<br />
strategic projects<br />
Announcement of the<br />
shortlist of projects<br />
Projects technical<br />
preparations.<br />
Analyses of the<br />
projects technical and<br />
financial implications.<br />
Wide range<br />
consultations of the<br />
draft Strategy<br />
Presentation of the<br />
Strategy<br />
Implementation Plan<br />
to the City Council for<br />
approval.<br />
Deadline: 15th March Deadline: 30th April Deadline: 31st August Deadline: 15th<br />
December<br />
24
4.3. Programs card<br />
Program :<br />
Goal :<br />
Description of the program :<br />
Connection with other programs :<br />
Possible sources of financing:<br />
Partners, possible stakeholders:<br />
Expected results: outcomes<br />
Target group:<br />
Program coordinator:<br />
25
Connection with other strategies :<br />
Estimated costs ( annually):<br />
Total cost:<br />
Program team:<br />
Supervisor of the program:<br />
Chairman of the team:<br />
Members of the program working team :<br />
Consultants:<br />
26
4.4. Projects card<br />
Project Title:<br />
<strong>LED</strong> Program Type:<br />
Brief description of the project:<br />
Project leader ( implementer):<br />
Beneficiaries<br />
Potential partners and their benefits:<br />
-<br />
Potential contributions to the project:<br />
-<br />
Preconditions:<br />
Risk factors:<br />
Calculated expenses and financing sources Till 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />
Expenditur<br />
es<br />
Financing<br />
sources<br />
Investment costs<br />
Exploitation costs<br />
Local government budget<br />
State budget<br />
Donors<br />
Other sources<br />
Project results<br />
2007<br />
2008<br />
2009<br />
2010<br />
27
4.5. Project feasibility study<br />
I. Basic Information<br />
1.1. Institution<br />
1.2. Team<br />
II. Information about the project<br />
2.1. Title of the project<br />
2.2. Localization<br />
2.3. Sector<br />
2.4. Type of project<br />
2.5. Definition of project goals<br />
28
III. Project identification<br />
3.1. Detailed project description<br />
3.2. Cooperation with other local governments and stakeholders<br />
3.3. Project impact to local economy and community<br />
3.4. Project impact to natural environment<br />
3.5. Project connection with strategies<br />
3.6. Tasks<br />
TASK DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE OTHERS<br />
Task 1<br />
Task ....<br />
IV. Project work plan<br />
4.1. Description of the work plan<br />
4.2. Graphic presentation of the work plan<br />
TASKS TIME TIME TIME TIME TIME TIME<br />
Task 1<br />
Task 2<br />
Task ..<br />
29
V. Budget of the project<br />
5.1. Estimated costs<br />
5.2. Possible sources of financing<br />
30
5.3. Detailed budget<br />
tasks<br />
task<br />
description<br />
COSTS CALCULATION<br />
number<br />
unit.<br />
RATE<br />
of units.<br />
TOTAL COST<br />
FINANCING SOURCES<br />
SOURCE 1 SOURCE 2 SOURCE 3<br />
Task 1<br />
Task 2<br />
Task 3<br />
Task 4<br />
Task 5<br />
Task 6<br />
Task ....<br />
Total (GEL)<br />
31
5.4. Cash flow analyses<br />
5.5. Project impact analyses<br />
VI. Additional information<br />
VII. Attachments<br />
32
5. Appendix – Directive of the Mayor of Tbilisi on up dating and<br />
implementation of the Strategy Implementation Plan for Tbilisi<br />
Directive No............. of the Mayor of Tbilisi<br />
of .........................................................<br />
on up-dating and implementation of the Strategy Implementation Plan for Tbilisi<br />
Under the provisions of the Resolution No .......... of Tbilisi City Council of............................ on passing<br />
the Strategy Implementation Plan for Tbilisi I hereby rule the following:<br />
§ 1<br />
I introduce the procedure of works concerning up-dating and implementing the Strategy<br />
Implementation Plan that has been attached to this Directive.<br />
§ 2<br />
I appoint the following Teams<br />
1. The Coordinating Team dealing with the Strategy Implementation Plan works. The Team is<br />
headed by ...................<br />
2. The Working Team<br />
3. The Interdepartmental Team<br />
4. Program Coordinators<br />
§ 3<br />
I oblige all the departments of Meria Tbilisi to cooperate with each other in developing the progressive<br />
Strategy Implementation Plan in accordance with their assigned responsibilities stated in the<br />
Appendix to this Directive.<br />
§ 4<br />
The Directive goes into effect on the day of its passage.<br />
REASONS <strong>FOR</strong> THE DECISION<br />
Under the provisions of the Resolution by Tbilisi City Council of ................. the Strategy<br />
Implementation Plan for the years of ........................ has been adopted. The Strategy<br />
Implementation Plan is a key element that integrates the city management system by linking<br />
long-term strategic objectives with the operational activity. A long-term plan of the most<br />
important development-oriented activities that has been founded on the priorities resulting from<br />
the current local social and economic situation is the basis for consecutive annual activity plans<br />
and budgets of the city. The annual mechanism of updating the Strategy Implementation Plan<br />
makes it a system tool to manage the growth of Tbilisi. Due to the participation in the process of<br />
diverse partners as well as to careful role distribution among specialists, social partners and<br />
decision-makers the Strategy Implementation Plan is not only an administrative procedure, but<br />
also a platform of cooperation for all groups that are responsible for and interested in the<br />
development of Tbilisi. Taking into consideration the nature of the annual Plan updating mechanism,<br />
it seems necessary to introduce a clear procedure and to define clearly personal responsibilities in<br />
order to make consequent editions of the Strategy Implementation Plan well prepared and effective.<br />
33
Appendix to the Mayor’s of<br />
Tbilisi Directive<br />
INTRODUCTORY IN<strong>FOR</strong>MATION<br />
1. The Strategy Implementation Plan is progressive.<br />
2. The Strategy Implementation Plan is a starting point for developing investment plans.<br />
3. The Strategy Implementation Plan is updated annually. Updating involves the introduction of new<br />
plans and updating data concerning projects that have already been included in the Plan. The<br />
time. perspective is prolonged by one year each time the next edition of the Plan is developed.<br />
4. Development of the Strategy Implementation Plan is always preceded by defining the local growth<br />
priorities.<br />
5. Every edition of the Plan is accompanied by the list of the most vital projects.<br />
6. The selection of projects to be included in the Plan is based on the evaluation criteria adopted in<br />
the decision-making process.<br />
34
1. STRUCTURING TEAMS DEALING WITH THE <strong>PLAN</strong> <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />
In the whole process the preparatory and conceptual works have been separated from the decisionmaking<br />
tasks on each stage of the Plan development. The teams and task separation are structured<br />
in such a way that selected groups of specialists can perform all the tasks that require professional<br />
background in accordance with good practice principles. If the team members are selected in this<br />
way, they are able to come to conclusions more effectively. The scope and diversity of issues tackled<br />
in the Plan are worth emphasising. The team members’ ability to synthetise and to analyse problems<br />
thoroughly will be a desired feature.<br />
The teams taking part in the Plan development:<br />
• Working Team<br />
• Interdepartmental Team<br />
• Social Council<br />
• Mayor and The City Council of Tbilisi<br />
• Specialists commissioned to perform special tasks<br />
The Working Team consists of 3-5 people – the employees of the Economic Policy Agency. The<br />
Coordinator of the Working Team works is Mr Davit Darsavelidze.<br />
This group is also a part of the Interdepartmental Team.<br />
The Interdepartmental Team is a group having a consulting and conceptual character. It consists of<br />
members of individual Departments of Meria – the experts on the areas that are crucial for the growth<br />
of the City. The team is responsible for the Plan merits.<br />
The Interdepartmental Team consists of people working in the following Meria departments:<br />
− Economic Policy Agency<br />
− Finance Agency<br />
− Municipal Improvement Agency<br />
− Property Management Agency<br />
− Urban Planning Agency<br />
− Transport Agency<br />
− Social Service & Culture Agency<br />
− Waste Management Agency<br />
− Health & Social Affairs Agency<br />
− Emergency Agency<br />
− Citizenship & Integration Agency<br />
− “Tbilisi Water” Ltd. (Municipal Enterprise)<br />
− “Metropolitan” Ltd. (Municipal Enterprise)<br />
The Interdepartmental team has also been joined by the administration workers from individual parts<br />
of Tbilisi:<br />
− Isani-Samgori<br />
− Didube-Chughureti<br />
− Gdani-Nadzaladevi<br />
− Vake-Saburtalo<br />
− Didgori<br />
− Old Tbilisi<br />
35
The Coordinator of the Team works is Mr Zviad Archuadze, the Director of Economic Policy Agency<br />
Social Council – consists of leaders of social/professional groups and heads of institutions,<br />
businesses and organisations that are important to the City. The Council plays a specific role – as a<br />
matter of fact it is an opinion-making body, so its members cannot be appointed at random. The<br />
Council’s structure should be an extension of the Interdepartmental Team.<br />
2.. <strong>PLAN</strong> PREPARATION PHASES – FIRST EDITION<br />
Phase one – Organisation of teams and adoption of the procedure<br />
• Appointing the Working Team<br />
• Appointing the Interdepartmental Team<br />
• Appointing the Council of City and Commune Development<br />
• Appointing the group of consultants<br />
• Adopting the Plan preparation procedure<br />
• Recognising techniques and tools to carry out works<br />
• Adopting a detailed timetable of the Plan preparation<br />
Phase two – The assessment of the development and competitiveness level of the City being a<br />
centre of business activity that offers high quality of life to its residents.<br />
• Collecting and analysing data about the present situation and perspectives of local development,<br />
including a survey of local businesses,<br />
• The analysis of the City situation in key areas,<br />
• The analysis of the City Development Strategy implementation process,<br />
• Writing reports about the analyses,<br />
• Writing the SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis, the identification of<br />
key problems and defining the development priorities.<br />
Phase three – the Plan preparation<br />
• Selection of the priorities and developing the Local Development Plan,<br />
• Defining the Plan implementation indices (of its product, result and impact) being the basis of the<br />
strategy implementation monitoring system,<br />
• Deciding on the material scope of the Plan, including an initial list of the strategic implementation<br />
projects.<br />
Phase four – Preparing the Plan document, consultations and final approval.<br />
• Defining the rules, procedures and tools for the works on the Plan,<br />
• Collecting the implementation projects, their evaluation and selection,<br />
• Developing the draft Plan document,<br />
• Presentation, consultations and modifications of the draft,<br />
• Passing the resolution by The City Council<br />
36
3. METHODOLOGY OF UPDATING THE <strong>LOCAL</strong> <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong><br />
Passing the Local Development Plan for Tbilisi, which is a document of strategic character, does not<br />
end the cooperation among partners involved in its implementation.<br />
Basic elements of the updating<br />
The Working and Interdepartmental teams and the City Social Council in a natural way take over the<br />
responsibility for the implementation of the Plan and for its updating. In the updating process the<br />
Council is the main opinion-making body for the Mayor and The City Council.<br />
The terms of accurate Plan updating largely determine formal and organisational tasks and the<br />
characteristic features of the Plan as well as the ways the Plan is developed:<br />
• its progressive character – updated annually,<br />
• works of the Plan documented on standard forms,<br />
• clear and carefully chosen criteria of the implementation projects selection,<br />
• application of IT tools to create and update bases of social and business data,<br />
• sensitivity to changes in the social and economic situation and in legal regulations,<br />
• stability of procedures, tools, teams (Teams, the Council), extensive consultation.<br />
Cyclical activities<br />
Updating is performed every year – although, obviously, not all the data change on the annual basis.<br />
Phase I<br />
The cycle starts with collecting information about the level of social and economic growth, the strategy<br />
implementation as well as about the accompanying phenomena. Additionally, surveys are conducted<br />
in the social and business groups. It is obvious that the more data is collected, the more effective<br />
further activities will be. At this stage it is important to decide the length of the cycle at which specific<br />
data will be collected. Also, the sources of the data should be identified.<br />
Phase II<br />
As in case of every strategic programming, the next activity deals with the strengths, weaknesses,<br />
opportunities and external threats the City has to face. It is a task that requires from the<br />
Interdepartmental Team members plenty of effort, effectiveness as well as professional expertise.<br />
The natural outcome of this analysis is the identification of problems that are of key importance for the<br />
growth of Tbilisi. Then the conceptual work commences in order to find out how these problems can<br />
be solved and thus to define the priorities. These activities are performed by the Interdepartmental<br />
Team and the Social Council of the City who defines the local development directions and<br />
recommends development priorities to the Mayor.<br />
Before the priorities are approved, the mayor consults them with the City Council commissions and<br />
with chosen organisations.<br />
Phase III<br />
Afterwards the consultations the adopted priorities are disseminated, which is the signal for the<br />
organisations to send in proposals of implementation projects within the frameworks of the adopted<br />
priorities. It is important that the priority development directions are announced in an appropriate way<br />
because the information about them should reach all the entities and public administration offices,<br />
organisations and institutions interested in implementation of various projects concerning these<br />
priorities. The proposals of implementation projects are submitted on standard forms to the Working<br />
Team. The Working Team’s task is to compare these proposals. Then, the Interdepartmental Team<br />
evaluates and selects them. The Team first of all takes into consideration the effectiveness of the<br />
proposals in implementing the adopted priorities. Another criterion is how well the implementation<br />
projects have been prepared. The projects that most effectively address the priorities are put on a<br />
37
short list out of which the best, strategic projects are selected. Then, after consultations with the City<br />
council, the Mayor finally approves and announces the winning projects.<br />
Phase IV<br />
The announcement of the list of the approved strategic projects is a signal for applicants to write their<br />
applications using standard forms. The use of standard forms make it possible to assess the projects<br />
by comparing their basic features and to remain impartial. The applications are reviewed by the<br />
Interdepartmental team who eventually qualifies these projects that lead to the completion of the Draft<br />
Local Development Plan for Tbilisi that is based on the adopted priorities. As a result it qualifies such<br />
projects that will contribute to forging the Draft Local Development Plan. The final version of the Plan<br />
is developed by the Plan Working Team.<br />
As a consequence of these works the Mayor consults various organisations and submits the Plan to<br />
the City Council for approval. The implementation of the Plan is a great challenge for all the<br />
participants of the process; its progress is monitored and systematically adjusted to the occurring<br />
changes or force majeure.<br />
The calendar of activities<br />
Each consecutive cycle starts with the evaluation and with the collection of data about social and<br />
economic situation of the City, then all the above mentioned activities are repeated. Professional<br />
evaluation of the situation not only facilitates the identification of key problems that may occur in the<br />
next Plan edition, but also defines the needs of the opinion-making groups. Right analysis<br />
conclusions (survey, statistical data analysis) make it possible to choose the best ways of public<br />
intervention.<br />
As it has been mentioned, the Local Development Plans should be written in yearly cycles. When<br />
choosing the starting dates of works, it is important to remember about the City and Commune<br />
budget procedure and the reporting deadlines. One of the key elements is to agree upon the final<br />
dates of applications to financial institutions and organisations that deal with financing the<br />
implementation projects.<br />
.<br />
38
COMPETENCE DISTRIBUTION IN THE PROCESS OF CREATING AND UPDATING THE <strong>LOCAL</strong> <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong><br />
The Plan Working Team The Plan Interdepartmental Team The Social Council<br />
Main task<br />
Full technical and organisational service during<br />
the Plan preparation<br />
The Team members should gradually overtake<br />
the role of external consultants and become the<br />
main body that manages the Plan.<br />
Detailed tasks<br />
• To collect and analyse information necessary<br />
for the assessment of the situation of the City<br />
and for reaching the development strategy<br />
goals,<br />
• To build and run data bases necessary to<br />
manage the City growth,<br />
• To hold meetings, write programmes and<br />
material packets for the meetings,<br />
• To take minutes at the meetings<br />
• To collect other information necessary for the<br />
Plan development, e.g. about the effectiveness<br />
of similar or already tested solutions,<br />
• To participate in all the meetings of other<br />
bodies where the Plan is discussed,<br />
• To organise and participate in the process of<br />
creating the Plan,<br />
• To define the scope of possible cooperation<br />
with the consultants.<br />
To identify key problems and decide on the<br />
Plan concept; to present the Plan to the<br />
Council and other organisations<br />
• To review materials prepared by the<br />
Working team and the consultants,<br />
• To conduct a SWOT analysis<br />
• To identify and recommend the key<br />
problems, the Plan priorities and the<br />
strategic projects to the Social Council of<br />
Tbilisi,<br />
• To approve the draft Plan and to present<br />
the Plan to the Social Council,<br />
• To participate in the process of<br />
consultation and approval.<br />
To review key problems of social and<br />
economic situation of the City, to select<br />
priorities and adopt the final version of the<br />
Plan<br />
• To participate in the Plan development<br />
through the analysis and evaluation of the<br />
reports concerning the process,<br />
• To select priorities around which the Plan<br />
activities will be structured,<br />
• To discuss the draft Plan , to present<br />
opinion about it and to recommend<br />
possible modifications,<br />
• To present and consult the Plan in their<br />
environments,<br />
• To approve the final version of the Plan,<br />
• To present the Plan to the City Council.<br />
39
4. THE TIMETABLE OF WORKS ON THE <strong>LOCAL</strong> <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong><br />
THE TIMETABLE OF THE PROCESS OF UPDATING AND IMPLEMENTING THE <strong>LOCAL</strong> <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong> – A<br />
YEARLY CYCLE<br />
PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III PHASE IV<br />
The assessment of the level of<br />
social and economic growth in<br />
Tbilisi and of the City<br />
Development Strategy<br />
implementation<br />
Identification of the key problems<br />
and defining the priorities of<br />
development<br />
Collecting proposed<br />
implementation projects;<br />
making a shortlist; final<br />
selection of the strategic<br />
projects<br />
Preparing applications of<br />
strategic projects<br />
Development and approval of the<br />
draft Local Development Plan<br />
• The report describing the<br />
current social and economic<br />
situation – in all areas of the<br />
City life; Highlighting the<br />
changes in relation to the<br />
previous edition of the report<br />
(last year report),<br />
• Information about the level of<br />
implementation of the City<br />
Development Strategy,<br />
• The description of new<br />
phenomena; entering related<br />
data to the base; Expanding<br />
and improving the system of<br />
data base application.<br />
• The assessment of the Plan<br />
implementation in the previous<br />
year,<br />
• The assessment of data<br />
resulting from the report;<br />
highlighting the trends and<br />
deviations; the SWOT analysis,<br />
• Identifying key problems;<br />
defining activity priorities;<br />
adopting the Plan<br />
implementation indicators,<br />
• Recommending priorities, their<br />
consultation and approval,<br />
• Announcing the priorities,<br />
• Collecting the proposed<br />
Plan implementation<br />
projects on special<br />
standard forms,<br />
• The evaluation, and<br />
selection of the projects;<br />
deciding if they conform<br />
with the Plan priorities,<br />
• Choosing the projects of<br />
the greatest importance –<br />
the set of strategic<br />
projects,<br />
• Announcing the final list of<br />
these projects.<br />
• Development of the strategic<br />
projects with the use of<br />
special standard forms,<br />
• Forging the draft Local<br />
development Plan,<br />
• Submitting it to the selected<br />
organisations for consultation<br />
and approval; introducing<br />
possible modifications; the<br />
approval,<br />
• Presenting the Plan to the<br />
City Council with a view of<br />
passing the suitable<br />
resolution.<br />
• Announcing the new invitation<br />
to tender projects for the new<br />
edition of the Plan.<br />
to 15 March to 30 April to 31 August to 15 December<br />
40
5. CRITERIA OF SELECTING PROJECTS <strong>FOR</strong> THE <strong>PLAN</strong><br />
In the process of developing the Plan the proposed projects need to be assessed. The teams<br />
participating in the process of writing the Plan are responsible for the evaluation of the projects from<br />
the technical and subject-matter point of view. The subject-matter analysis indicates those projects<br />
that will contribute the most to reaching the projected goals.<br />
The subject-matter assessment will be carried out in two stages:<br />
- the first stage leading to the decision which priorities are the most important,<br />
- the second stage, defining how individual project will contribute to reaching the adopted priorities.<br />
The Interdepartmental and Working Teams decide about the importance of each priority, marking<br />
them from 1 to 6.<br />
On the second stage each of the projects will be related to the priorities by another mark, from 0 to 3.<br />
The scale of assessing the projects depending on how they meet the priorities (from 0 to 3 points)<br />
reflects the following assumptions:<br />
0 – the project is not related to the priorities whatsoever;<br />
1 – there is a weak link between the project and the priority,<br />
2 – the project will significantly improve on a micro scale (locally, temporarily, in relation to a specific<br />
group of beneficiaries) the present situation in the priority area,<br />
3 – the project will significantly improve the situation in the priority area throughout the whole city.<br />
41
<strong>LOCAL</strong><br />
<strong>ECONOMIC</strong><br />
<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br />
<strong>PLAN</strong> <strong>FOR</strong> <strong>TBILISI</strong><br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
<strong>LED</strong> STRATEGY DRAFT<br />
Tbilisi City Hall │ Economic Policy Agency<br />
Address: 2, Liberty Sq │ Tbilisi 0105, Georgia<br />
Tel.:(+99532)932314 │ Fax.:(+99532)932895<br />
E-Mail: economic@tbilisi.gov.ge<br />
www.tbilisi.gov.ge
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 5<br />
1. Cities matter ............................................................................................................................................. 6<br />
1.1. Cities are key centers of new economy.............................................................................................. 6<br />
1.2. Role of cities for national economy..................................................................................................... 8<br />
1.3. Role of Tbilisi in Georgia in region .................................................................................................... 10<br />
2. Cities compete with other locations.................................................................................................... 13<br />
2.1. City competitiveness......................................................................................................................... 13<br />
2.2. Factors of competitiveness............................................................................................................... 14<br />
2.3. Assessment of Tbilisi competitiveness ............................................................................................. 16<br />
3. New dimension of city policies ( on the way to knowledge base economy) .................................. 20<br />
3.1. Skilled workforce............................................................................................................................... 20<br />
3.2. Clusters ............................................................................................................................................ 21<br />
3.3. Start ups ........................................................................................................................................... 25<br />
3.4. Quality of place................................................................................................................................. 26<br />
3.5. Tbilisi territorial structure................................................................................................................... 27<br />
3.5.1. Basic historical stages............................................................................................................... 27<br />
3.5.2. Spatial structure ........................................................................................................................ 28<br />
3.5.3. New trends of Tbilisi city functional-spatial development under new social-economic conditions29<br />
3.6. Allocation of new development projects ........................................................................................... 31<br />
4. Tbilisi economy ..................................................................................................................................... 34<br />
4.1. Economic active population.............................................................................................................. 34<br />
4.2. Employment ..................................................................................................................................... 35<br />
4.3. Number of firms by sector................................................................................................................. 37<br />
4.4. Turnover in business sector.............................................................................................................. 38<br />
4.5. Earnings ........................................................................................................................................... 40<br />
4.6. General data of external trade .......................................................................................................... 42<br />
2
4.7. Key industries of Tbilisi economy...................................................................................................... 44<br />
4.8. Identification of key problems facing City of Tbilisi economy ........................................................... 49<br />
5. Vision...................................................................................................................................................... 50<br />
6. Strategic directions ............................................................................................................................... 52<br />
7. Strategy implementation....................................................................................................................... 62<br />
8. Strategy monitoring .............................................................................................................................. 64<br />
3
CHARTS<br />
Chart 1-1 Tbilisi in the region SWOT analysis ................................................................................................................................................................11<br />
Chart 2-1 City of Kutaisi SWOT analysis.....................................................................................................................................................................18<br />
Chart 2-2 City of Rustavi SWOT analysis...................................................................................................................................................................18<br />
Chart 2-3 City of Batumi SWOT analysis....................................................................................................................................................................19<br />
Chart 4-1 Employed in business sector by regions........................................................................................................................................................35<br />
Chart 4-2 Turnover in business sector by regions in 2006 ...........................................................................................................................................38<br />
Chart 4-3 Volume of turnover per employee in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi............................................................................................39<br />
Chart 4-4 Average monthly earnings in business sector by regions in 2006.............................................................................................................40<br />
Chart 4-5 Turnover and employment in hotels in regions in 2006...............................................................................................................................44<br />
Chart 4-6 Turnover and employment in construction in regions in 2006...................................................................................................................45<br />
Chart 4-7 Turnover and employment in enterprises of trade in regions in 2006......................................................................................................46<br />
Chart 4-8 Turnover and employment in Industry in regions in 2006 ..........................................................................................................................47<br />
TABLES<br />
Table 2-1 City of Tbilisi in the country, assessment results 17<br />
Table 3-1 The employed by type of activity. 20<br />
Table 3-2 Number of new registered entities by regions 25<br />
Table 3-3 Number of new businesses by sector in Tbilisi. 25<br />
Table 4-1 Employment in Tbilisi 36<br />
Table 4-2 Structure of employment In Tbilisi 36<br />
Table 4-3 Number of registered entities by kind of economic activity (by the end of year; unit). 37<br />
Table 4-4 Number of registered entities by districts of Tbilisi 37<br />
Table 4-5 Turnover in business sector in mln GEL 38<br />
Table 4-6 Turnover in business sector and employment 39<br />
Table 4-7 Earnings in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi 40<br />
Table 4-8 Average monthly wages in sectors 41<br />
Table 4-9 Georgian external trade 42<br />
Table 4-10 External trade by groups of countries 42<br />
Table 4-11 Commodity positions by exports and import in 2006 43<br />
Table 6-1 Programs and projects of strategic direction – Booming regional gateway 53<br />
Table 6-2 Programs and projects of strategic direction – Time for business 55<br />
Table 6-3 Programs and projects of strategic direction – A place to live 57<br />
Table 6-4 Programs and projects of strategic direction – The hospitable city 59<br />
Table 6-5 Programs and projects of strategic direction – People empower Tbilisi 61<br />
4
Introduction<br />
Tbilisi represents important industrial, social and cultural center of East Europe and<br />
Caucasus region and, at the dawn of the millennium, is becoming one of the most<br />
important transportation links for global energy carriers, information flows and trade<br />
projects.<br />
The construction of the Kars (Turkey)-Tbilisi-Baku (Azerbaijan) 826-kilometer railway will<br />
probably be the most significant project in the entire Caucasus and could bring<br />
tremendous economic dividends to the region and international economy. The railway line<br />
has huge potential to deepen the integration of Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan, which, in<br />
turn, will link them more closely with Europe and Asia.<br />
In the Soviet era Tbilisi and Georgia were a part of centrally planned socialist economy.<br />
Transportation system, cooperation networks, trade links were mainly developed within<br />
internal Soviet market. And the country’s contacts with the rest of the world, including<br />
transportation infrastructure, were led through the Soviet Union. Political reasons and<br />
missing appropriate infrastructure not only stopped Georgia from the relations with<br />
partners from outside the USSR but, due to the supremacy of central institutions, also<br />
hindered bilateral contacts between the republics.<br />
As a result of the political changes in the region transportation channels across Northern<br />
Caucasus and Russia are closed.<br />
Presently Georgia and Tbilisi are re-establishing their traditional central role on the route<br />
from Asia to Europe. Not only does it require reconstructing economic and cultural links<br />
but it is also vitally important to invest in transportation sector. Investments in the sea<br />
harbours of Baku and Poti, the airport in Tbilisi and Baku, pipelines from Azerbaijan via<br />
Tbilisi to Turkey, new road and railway connections from Tbilisi to Turkey and Baku will<br />
integrate Georgia and Tbilisi into transit services and help rebuild natural cooperation<br />
bonds.<br />
By January 1, 2006, population of Tbilisi amounted to 1093 thousand, 15.2% of Tbilisi<br />
population is ethnically non-Georgians. The major non-Georgian ethnic groups are<br />
Armenians, Russians, Azeri and Sestinas.<br />
Tbilisi represents multi-functional administrational, industrial and cultural-educational<br />
centre of Georgia.<br />
At the beginning of 2007 Tbilisi significantly expanded its territory incorporating suburban<br />
areas. As a result, more housing and commercial land appeared on the market, which is<br />
of key importance for the growth of Tbilisi metropolitan area.<br />
5
1. Cities matter<br />
1.1. Cities are key centers of new economy<br />
Transformation of an industrial town into a post-industrial city is a long-lasting and<br />
complex process. The examples of cities that have already undergone this process offer<br />
experience that is worth using when working on Tbilisi economic development plan.<br />
In the process of transformation three phases can be distinguished:<br />
• crisis of a traditional industrial town,<br />
• attracting foreign investors to the city,<br />
• inward development based on unique identity and own resources.<br />
The phases can overlap and their duration cannot be determined in advance. The<br />
intensity and directions of changes depend on the local actors, their cooperation and<br />
capability to implement plans.<br />
The first phase include:<br />
• a substantial amount of workforce is made redundant in industry sector,<br />
• entrepreneurs set up service and trading companies that do not require much<br />
capital,<br />
• deprivation of industrial districts,<br />
• deprivation of housing districts with low skilled communities,<br />
• development of informal sector,<br />
• education sector have no clear perspectives and teaching standards in new<br />
professions.<br />
Finding foreign investors make it possible to introduce to the economy the elements that<br />
in the first phase are available locally, such as:<br />
• capital,<br />
• new technologies in production and management,<br />
• new standards of employees’ recruitment,<br />
• new cooperation links with other national economies,<br />
• new products that are competitive on global markets.<br />
6
It is hard to overestimate those benefits for the city economy that are generated by foreign<br />
investors, but we should not forget that the reasons why those firm invest in our cit must<br />
be thoroughly analysed. It will help us to take maximum advantage of these investments<br />
and prevent disappointment if our expectations are unrealistic.<br />
Foreign firms invest in order to:<br />
• lower the production costs,<br />
• increase the value of the invested capital,<br />
• enter new markets,<br />
• gain access to resources that are out of reach where they have been operating so<br />
far.<br />
In a longer perspective these companies transfer their business activity to new locations<br />
that provide them with better business environment.<br />
For a long-term competitiveness of the city economy the third phase is of key importance.<br />
It is based on endogenic potentials and the city identity.<br />
The development of local businesses also leads to new quality of cooperation with foreign<br />
investors who invest their capital not only to benefit from the consumption potential of the<br />
local market and from lower production costs, but are also interested in finding new<br />
partners who will give them access to better solutions. It means that financial relations<br />
change too – the investor not only bears the costs of their business activity, but also<br />
shares their profits with a local partner.<br />
In the second half of the 20th century the economy of Tbilisi was based on industrial<br />
plants producing for the demand of the Soviet Union market. Cooperation links, legal<br />
regulations, transport infrastructure and business environment were oriented at satisfying<br />
the needs of this type of economy, therefore the change of production profile of entering<br />
new markets were hardly possible.<br />
After the collapse of the Soviet Union and, consequently, of the centrally managed<br />
economy many manufacturing firms in Tbilisi lost their markets and either closed down or<br />
reduced their employment and production. The system reform, introduction of market<br />
economy and opening to new markets resulted in a thorough transformation of Tbilisi<br />
economy.<br />
Although some positive effects can be observed, the transformation process is long and<br />
generates serious social problems and costs. In order to understand the ongoing<br />
changes, we cannot view the problem as merely a systematic one. The economy of Tbilisi<br />
is also influenced by other economic transformation factors that do not happen only in the<br />
post-communist countries, but are observed all over the world. These factors are:<br />
• globalisation and increasingly free flow of knowledge and ideas, capital, products<br />
and services as well as people among the regions and cities of the world,<br />
• the use of new technology by businesses, state and local governments as well as<br />
by ordinary people,<br />
• cultural changes in the family model and life aspirations of the young generation.<br />
7
Due to the overlapping effects of regained independence and system transformation on<br />
the other three universal processes both Georgia and Tbilisi are facing a great challenge.<br />
Public officials as well as entrepreneurs and ordinary residents of Tbilisi must understand<br />
the ongoing changes and their implications in order to take a maximum advantage of new<br />
opportunities. They have to reduce the social costs to minimum and concentrate their<br />
resources in the areas where the perspectives of growth are the most promising.<br />
In order to strengthen the foundations of Georgia’s and Tbilisi’s new economic position<br />
and to maximise the effects of the transformation system, it is vital to introduce the<br />
following changes and reforms:<br />
1. The deep reform of Georgian economy resulted in the fact that environment<br />
regulators can facilitate establishing and running business on the terms equal to those<br />
in the developed countries with market economy.<br />
2. Building new transport and telecommunication infrastructures, that will connect<br />
Georgia with the partners in the region and in the world, will make it possible to export<br />
and import goods and services.<br />
3. The reform of the education system and introducing the culture of life long learning to<br />
instruct skilled workforce according to the standards of the global job market.<br />
4. Investments in technical infrastructure and the city revitalisation make Tbilisi an<br />
attractive place to live and do business.<br />
1.2. Role of cities for national economy<br />
City are the more and more powerful engines of the national and global economy. Two<br />
key forces - the globalization and the commercialization of new information as well as<br />
communications technologies - have been driving the massive changes and thus<br />
restructuring cities. Globalization is linked to liberalized trade and the opening up of world<br />
markets through organizations and agreements such as the Word Trade Organization or<br />
the European Union. Global corporations continue to expand their role on the world stage<br />
through expansion, mergers and acquisitions.<br />
Globalization would not be possible if there had not been for the explosion of new<br />
information technologies with mobile wireless communication, personal computers, and<br />
networks of internet, intranet and extranet. All of these have made it possible to manage<br />
facilities distributed around the world, for the labour to move more freely across national<br />
boundaries, and for the information, currencies and transactions to flow smoothly to any<br />
destination. As globalization proceeds, regional and national economies become more<br />
closely intertwined. National boundaries have gradually become less relevant as<br />
globalization and information technology have reduced the role of the nation state. Big<br />
metropolises with skilled workforce, globally connected businesses have emerged as the<br />
engines of the new economy.<br />
Globalization, and intensive competition which is integral to it, has led to a massive<br />
restructuring of regional economies. The widespread de-industrialization of cities,<br />
particularly of urban cores, is clear evidence of this. As the global marketplace expands,<br />
each city is forced to focus upon the few things that it is very good at, in which it can<br />
successfully compete at a global scale.<br />
8
This more recent phase of economic restructuring has been characterized by a<br />
transformation to a knowledge economy. The future quality of life in advanced economies<br />
depends on upgrading and moving the economy towards a concentration in high value<br />
added activities from any industry. The key is to focus on the high order, innovation<br />
based, high productivity activities in each industry. The quality of life and economic<br />
development, depend on making a successful transition to a knowledge economy.<br />
Unlike an economy based on traditional manufacturing and natural resource extraction, in<br />
which factors such as access to raw materials may have played a central role, the<br />
knowledge economy is driven by:<br />
• well educated and high-skilled workforce,<br />
• innovation – creativity, flexibility, research and development,<br />
• entrepreneurship – mentoring, networking, strategic alliances,<br />
• information and communications technology (ICT).<br />
The knowledge economy is present in all segments of our society and our economy. It is<br />
not confined to certain groups, such as university graduates, or certain industries, such as<br />
information technology or telecommunications. Rather, the knowledge economy<br />
represents a way of life and a way of producing goods and services that focus on<br />
continuous improvement of the above characteristics. Even “traditional” industries, can be,<br />
or rather should be, a part of the knowledge-based economy. Today successful<br />
companies in older industries employ high quality design and flexible advanced<br />
manufacturing.<br />
Cities have always been areas of growth, the places where economic resources,<br />
entrepreneurship, and a diverse population provided natural opportunity for starting new<br />
economic, cultural and intellectual activities. Cities have always fostered the creativity that<br />
produces technological advancements and new forms of commercial organizations. There<br />
are a lot of good examples in the last century of the power of cities to create new<br />
technological and commercial innovations, as a result of combined activities of<br />
entrepreneurs, artists and technicians congregated in these places. What we are<br />
witnessing now in successful North American and European cities is the concurrence of<br />
cultural and technological creativity that drive the new economy. The multi-media<br />
industries that have exploded in several places are example of this creative convergence.<br />
There is an assortment of specific conditions that exist in cities and which make them a<br />
fertile ground for innovation, creativity, and technological and commercial advancement.<br />
The most important thing that cities can offer is the diverse pool of skilled labour required<br />
to make large-scale and specialized production possible. Secondly, because of their size<br />
cities should offer local markets of sufficient size for specialized goods and services to be<br />
developed. Thirdly, because of their geographical conditions and the enhanced possibility<br />
for formal and informal contacts of all kinds, cities are places where technology and knowhow<br />
can spill over. Information flows easily, and chance encounters can bring together<br />
diverse interests and expertise to create new products and services.<br />
In this context, urban arts and cultural amenities - including not only formal events and<br />
places such as galleries, music halls or museums, but also the vitality of its more informal<br />
amenities like restaurants, street cafés, bookstores and outdoor festivals - becomes<br />
tangible assets that play a role in fostering creativity and innovation.<br />
9
Cities combine diversity – of population and resources of all kinds. Unique assets show<br />
the innovative capacity and the bunch of possibilities of each city. Under today’s economic<br />
conditions, in the global knowledge economy that is driven by information, creativity,<br />
innovation and technology, when cities are at centre stage, these special urban<br />
characteristic are of the biggest importance.<br />
The elimination, and in some places even the reduction, of national trade barriers has<br />
brought us to the moment when either people or businesses are choosing to locate and<br />
expand in cities that have the mix of economic, social, political and other attributes for long<br />
term success. As a result of urban renaissance we are witnessing the rapid growth of<br />
many North American and European cities. Urban-based industries are the fast-growth<br />
industries, people are moving back to cities and central governments are commencing<br />
massive urban regeneration schemes. It more and more widely recognized that cities are<br />
the focal points of national economies and should follow through with proactive urban<br />
regeneration strategies and investment funding.<br />
1.3. Role of Tbilisi in Georgia in region<br />
Tbilisi in the region<br />
After the collapse of the Soviet Union Georgia is regaining its traditional role in the region.<br />
The country is situated along the transport links connecting Asia with Europe and Tbilisi<br />
plays the role of service centre influencing Caucasus and the neighboring regions. In the<br />
regional exchange Tbilisi tries to become the central point of:<br />
• economic life with advanced services where the most competitive business of the<br />
region operate from,<br />
• political life with the head offices of international organizations and donor<br />
organizations operating in the region,<br />
• education and research that attract young people from the whole region,<br />
• culture and sport with the most important sports and cultural events in the region,<br />
• tourist industry with the largest number of visitors.<br />
The list of Tbilisi competitors in the region includes the cities of Ukraine, Turkey, Russia,<br />
Azerbaijan, Armenia and the countries of central Asia that aspire to the position of the<br />
regional service centre.<br />
Due to the political situation there are no cooperation links in the region and, therefore,<br />
Tbilisi has no competition in Northern Caucasus as well as in the neighbouring parts of<br />
Russia. Moreover, none of the Ukrainian cities attempts to play an active role in Caucasus<br />
so there is no alternative for Tbilisi.<br />
Despite dynamic economic exchange with Turkey, in its eastern part there are no strong<br />
urban centres that could be able to compete with Tbilisi.<br />
That leaves us with Baku and Erevan, the capital cities of Azerbaijan and Armenia as<br />
Tbilisi’s natural and historical rivals. In Central Asia it is Kazakhstan with its strong political<br />
and economic position that boasts the role of a regional leader. Its authorities, businesses<br />
and organisations are very active and have achieved the position of an important<br />
economic partner as well as the key investors in the region.<br />
10
Kazakh cities, mainly Astana and Alma-Ata, are likely to become regional centres that<br />
influence neighbouring countries and attract investors, events and people. Numerous<br />
investments in Astana and the plans of further local development make the city a regional<br />
leader. Also, the historical, institutional and demographic potential of Alma-Ata positions<br />
this city as another significant competition in the region. The political, social and economic<br />
situation in other countries of Central Asia results in the limited potential of other cities in<br />
the region, so they cannot threaten the leading position of Tbilisi. Therefore, the cities<br />
eventually included in the comparative analysis were Astana, Alma-Ata, Baku and<br />
Erevan.<br />
The City team and the consultants carried out the SWOT analysis of Tbilisi, relating its<br />
position in the region to Astana, Alma-Ata, Baku and Erevan.<br />
By means of the SWOT competitive assessment in the system of coordinates the X axis<br />
(horizontal) the strengths and opportunities of Tbilisi were placed. Taking into<br />
consideration the time factor and analysing the prospective changes that are likely to<br />
happen in Tbilisi and in its rival cities the areas of threats and opportunities were placed<br />
on the Y axis (vertical).<br />
Tbilisi in the region<br />
Chart 1-1 Tbilisi in the region SWOT analysis<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
quality of life<br />
transport and<br />
telecommunication accessibility<br />
skilled workforce<br />
technical<br />
infrastructure<br />
cost of doing<br />
business<br />
institutional infrastructure<br />
legal regulation<br />
and policy<br />
economic<br />
demographic<br />
structure<br />
city recognition<br />
Weaknesses<br />
networking<br />
social diversity<br />
Strengths<br />
R&D<br />
THREATS<br />
11
While assessing the present condition of the elementary city competitiveness factors with<br />
a view to its weak and strong points the team pointed out a particularly weak position of<br />
the Research and development sector and the highly unattractive traditional structure of<br />
local economy. The team found that the capacity to start cooperation links and networking<br />
as well as the accessibility of funds are slightly more satisfying but still poor. Also, the<br />
qualifications of workforce, technical and institutional infrastructure, transport accessibility,<br />
social diversity and the quality of life need to be improved.<br />
In most cases the prospects of improvement were observed. The best opportunities are<br />
likely to be observed in the quality of life and the transport and telecommunications<br />
accessibility. The areas facing the most significant threats are R&D, networking and the<br />
groups threatened by social exclusion of those who do not participate in economic and<br />
life.<br />
The demographic situation was assessed on a medium level. As for strong points of the<br />
city, legal regulations, state policies and the city recognition were ranked the highest.<br />
Other strong points included the costs of doing business, which were most likely to<br />
improve, and the institutional infrastructure. Further reforms will make it possible to<br />
improve legal framework. Ambitious plans of other cities may threaten the recognition of<br />
Tbilisi as the regional centre.<br />
In conclusion, it was pointed out that public intervention is necessary to support the<br />
development of R&D, networking, the city recognition, workforce skills, availability of<br />
financial resources and technical infrastructure. With regard to the technical infrastructure<br />
it seems necessary to expand space for business activities, i.e. to developed land for<br />
industrial, logistic and office activities with full infrastructure for services. Special attention<br />
was paid to meeting the requirements of start-ups, mainly to regulations that make<br />
establishing a business cheaper and less time-consuming.<br />
12
2. Cities compete with other locations<br />
2.1. City competitiveness<br />
Cities are now competing at both a national and international level to attract investment,<br />
citizens as well as visitors.<br />
Where globalization has had a positive effect in stimulating economic growth, these<br />
benefits have not been evenly distributed. Cities therefore continue to experience<br />
problems of poverty and inequality. In developing cities these problems are compounded<br />
by urbanization which has led to problems of unemployment, the proliferation of informal<br />
settlements and environmental degradation. All cities have to face challenges because of:<br />
1. economy transformation from the traditional to new knowledge based economy<br />
2. limited revenue capacity of companies, citizens and local governments<br />
3. movement of people and businesses<br />
4. suburbanization and poverty in central areas<br />
5. need of new education following workforce development demand<br />
Transformation require efficient management to follow all changes, to face challenges and<br />
to utilize resources efficiently. It's universally known that better performing cities and those<br />
recognized as skilfully managed are more attractive for new businesses. Although there<br />
is a lack of comparative standards with which to measure whether a city is well<br />
performing and assess key drivers of high performance, it is obvious that ability to cope<br />
with change, leadership and vision shown by city representatives, its economic, social and<br />
cultural diversity as well as its ability to make effective use of human capital are the<br />
conditioning foundations of high performing city.<br />
The fact that some sectors achieve a critical mass in a city may be more important than<br />
the location of a city itself. Modern cities in global position in the research and<br />
commercialization of new technologies are not based on its location but on the fact that<br />
this sector demonstrates a high degree of clustering and innovation, which makes the city<br />
attractive to the others.<br />
There are some obstacles on the way to a well managed competitive city that should be<br />
taken into a count:<br />
1. the importance of developing effective metropolitan policies and engaging in long term<br />
spatial planning,<br />
2. new strategies require strong civic leadership and vision to convince public to<br />
changes,<br />
3. weak citizen participation is a current and future problem and may result in declining<br />
identification with governance structures and policies,<br />
4. coordination and cooperation between different levels (region, neighbourhood) ,<br />
sectors and partners (public, private and community organizations or decision<br />
makers, professionals and stakeholders),<br />
5. the question how far local government should be involved in local economy.<br />
13
These and other important issues should be discussed with a local stakeholders at the<br />
beginning when the framework is constructed. The agreement will create boundaries for<br />
all policies and define public role in city development activities.<br />
2.2. Factors of competitiveness<br />
City competitiveness can be defined as the ability to attract and retain citizens, investment<br />
and good quality work places as well as visitors. It is no less important to support city<br />
economy in such a way that city products keep strong position on international markets.<br />
As we continue to move towards a global knowledge economy, the competitive playing<br />
field has shifted dramatically. City-regions are now competing with one another:<br />
• to attract skilled labor;<br />
• to attract new investment and quality jobs;<br />
• for their share of global markets in the city’s export cluster.<br />
In a global knowledge economy, skilled labor, investment and jobs are increasingly<br />
mobile. They can move relatively easily across national boundaries, and between cities.<br />
Products and services compete globally. Sales of these products and services can<br />
generate added value, income, investment and jobs in the region in which they are<br />
produced. It means that cities should build on their strengths. Notably, they can create<br />
partnerships and employment and innovation pacts, bringing together key players within<br />
an area – elected representatives, business leaders, NGOs, interest groups and<br />
universities – to engage in positive and dynamic social and economic development.<br />
Cities should tackle their weaknesses, boosting employability among those groups within<br />
the population which find it hardest to access employment. In some cases, cities compete<br />
directly with other cities for market share, as in the tourism industry, where the character,<br />
attractions and events compete directly to attract tourists and their money. In other cases,<br />
the role of cities in supporting the competitiveness of their exports is more indirect.<br />
As globalization proceeds, cities continue to take centre stage in the global economic<br />
theatre. The relationship between cities is primarily one of intense competition. Ultimately,<br />
a sustained or improved quality of life in particular metropolises depends upon its ability to<br />
compete successfully with other cities and to provide the necessary economic foundations<br />
for growth. Competitive businesses and industries create jobs for residents and labor<br />
force, and assessment revenue for the city that allows it to provide a range of social,<br />
community, physical and other services and programs.<br />
Cities often naturally provide a stimulating environment for innovation and businesses to<br />
flourish and there are steps they can take to further foster this environment. The added<br />
value of city-level actions is that they have more information on the specificities of the<br />
business environment and are able to carry out smaller scale complex actions tackling<br />
multiple interlinked problems. Those are factors that allow cities to successfully compete<br />
with each other.<br />
14
Different factors influence the city competitiveness. The most important ones are listed<br />
below:<br />
• Demographic structure.<br />
• Skilled workforce.<br />
• Quality of life.<br />
• Social diversity.<br />
• City recognition.<br />
• City recognition and reputation.<br />
• Costs of doing business.<br />
• Economic structure.<br />
• Financing.<br />
• Networking.<br />
• Research and development.<br />
• Institutional infrastructure.<br />
• Legal regulations and policies.<br />
• Transport and telecommunication accessibility.<br />
• Technical infrastructure.<br />
Demographic structure - when planning long-term involvement in economic<br />
development the demographic trends such as migration rate, income distribution or age<br />
structure cannot be omitted since they influence the availability of workforce, the<br />
consumers’ buying potential and local business environment.<br />
Skilled workforce -intellectual capital, ingenuity, creativity and technical capabilities of<br />
the labor force are key drivers of economic growth nowadays. This is why the availability<br />
of qualified workforce is a crucial factor when analyzing city competitiveness.<br />
Quality of life - to attract and retain top specialists needed for the city’s economy to<br />
develop, a region needs to provide them with satisfying conditions of living. Safe and<br />
healthy physical environment, diversified opportunities for leisure, rich urban culture,<br />
chances of professional and personal growth are among the main factors influencing<br />
individuals’ decisions regarding their choice of a place of stay.<br />
Social diversity - wealth and poverty distribution, social exclusion phenomena,<br />
community’s social capital are important factors to be taken into consideration when<br />
choosing industries to focus on.<br />
City recognition - being easily recognized in a region and worldwide as a city with<br />
certain industries developed can facilitate the process of attracting international<br />
investments, gaining business partners and entering new markets.<br />
Economic structure - among the key factors influencing the likeliness of business to<br />
succeed are its economic surroundings. This factor includes industrial profile of the region,<br />
developed economy sectors, the quality and extent of supply chains, the competitiveness<br />
of local companies, etc.<br />
Costs of doing business - costs related to companies’ activities are often decisive<br />
when choosing a region for opening a new branch or founding a new company. These<br />
include state and municipal tax levels, land and resources prices, office rents, wages and<br />
so on.<br />
15
Financing business – such initiatives as expansion to new markets or founding new<br />
companies very often involve finding external financial support. The availability of various<br />
institutions providing local firms with support on different levels, from small credits to joint<br />
venture capitals, influences the chances of product development.<br />
Networking - the strength of inter-firm and public-private relationships between<br />
companies, institutions and a government within the region and beyond. High networking<br />
level can seriously boost economic activity within the region, fostering innovation and<br />
enabling the establishment of strategic alliances. Networking can take place both on<br />
informal (random encounters) and formal (conferences, industry associations meetings)<br />
basis.<br />
Institutional infrastructure - the existence and quality of services of various<br />
institutions supporting business, such as research centers, health, education and<br />
community services, companies dealing with finance, legal issues, marketing or<br />
transportation are crucial for business climate in the region.<br />
Legal regulations and policies - policies and programs supporting this kind of<br />
activity and quality of services that public administration provides to the market. These<br />
may include anti-trust law, regulations regarding conditions of entering the market, local<br />
officials willingness to support the branch and such.<br />
Transport and telecommunication accessibility - collecting information and being<br />
able to act fast are becoming increasingly important elements in gaining competitive<br />
advantage. That is why companies are interested in the availability of transportation<br />
channels such as roads, airports, railways, along with telecommunication services –<br />
internet, mobile telephony and such.<br />
Technical infrastructure - the availability of space for doing business (from small<br />
offices for the start-ups and SMEs to Greenfield investment land for multinationals),<br />
electricity supply and the presence of basic urban infrastructure such as piped services<br />
(water, sewers) are among the basic elements necessary for businesses to develop.<br />
2.3. Assessment of Tbilisi competitiveness<br />
The competitiveness of Tbilisi was assessed in two aspects:<br />
• its competitiveness in relation to other Georgian cities,<br />
• its competitiveness in relation to other cities in the region of Caucasus and central<br />
Asia.<br />
The assessments were carried out by means of the SWOT method, which is usually<br />
applied by the SRGG when evaluating the competitiveness of cities.<br />
Tbilisi in the country<br />
In order to assess the economic situation of Georgian cities during the workshop session<br />
of the City Team the guests from other Georgian cities evaluated current economic<br />
changes in their environment. They took into consideration the condition of both traditional<br />
and emerging economic sectors, demographic changes and the workforce educational<br />
improvement, the level of technical and urban infrastructure.<br />
The assessments were performed with Tbilisi city team and the guests from Rustavi,<br />
Batumi and Kutaisi<br />
16
The assessment results are presented in the table below.<br />
Table 2-1 City of Tbilisi in the country, assessment results<br />
Demography<br />
Kutaisi Tbilisi. Rustawi Batumi Gori<br />
• population 0 + 0 + -<br />
• natural birth rate + + + + - -<br />
• age structure - - - - - - -<br />
• migrations - - + - 0 -<br />
• suburbanisation 0 +- - - 0<br />
Economy<br />
• traditional economy - - - - + +<br />
• new sectors + ++ + + 0<br />
• institutional infrastructure + ++ + ++ ++<br />
• new city products + ++ + + +<br />
Education<br />
• school education + +++ + ++ ++<br />
• business supply + +++ 0 + +<br />
• vocational trainings 0 +++ 0 + +<br />
Financing resources<br />
• local government ++ +++ ++ ++ ++<br />
• business + + + ++ ++<br />
• citizens + + + + +<br />
Local government<br />
• cooperation with Central ++ +++ + ++ ++<br />
Government<br />
• cooperation with<br />
0 ++ + + 0<br />
neighbor municipalities<br />
• cooperation with citizens ++ ++ + + +<br />
• cooperation with<br />
+ +++ + ++ ++<br />
business<br />
Explanation:<br />
+++ increase more than 75%<br />
++ increase more than 25% less 75%<br />
+ increase more than 25% less 1%<br />
--- decrease more than 1% less 25%<br />
-- decrease more than 25% less 75%<br />
- decrease more than 75%<br />
The results show that all the cities are changing dynamically and their situation is<br />
improving.<br />
In the second phase the city teams carried out the SWOT competitive assessment of their<br />
cities in relation to other Georgian cities.<br />
17
City of Kutaisi<br />
Chart 2-1 City of Kutaisi SWOT analysis<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
2 Business<br />
organizations<br />
6 Reputation<br />
of the City<br />
3 Education system<br />
4 Infrastructure<br />
Weaknesses<br />
1 Workforce<br />
Strengths<br />
5 Quality of life<br />
THREATS<br />
City of Rustavi<br />
Chart 2-2 City of Rustavi SWOT analysis<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
4 Infrastructure<br />
5 Quality of life<br />
1 Workforce<br />
6 Reputation<br />
of the City<br />
Weaknesses<br />
2 Business<br />
organizations<br />
Strengths<br />
3 Education system<br />
THREATS<br />
18
City of Batumi<br />
Chart 2-3 City of Batumi SWOT analysis<br />
OPPORTUNITIES<br />
2 Business<br />
organization<br />
s<br />
1 Workforce<br />
4 Infrastructure<br />
6 Reputation<br />
of the City<br />
Weaknesses<br />
3 Education system<br />
Strengths<br />
5 Quality of life<br />
THREATS<br />
The SWOT competitive assessment is based on positioning the key factors of city<br />
competitiveness in a coordinate system. The X axis allows to evaluate factors such as<br />
strong and weak points of the city. The Y axis positions the same factor vertically and<br />
demonstrates the opportunities and threats it will bring in the future. The results of the<br />
SWOT competitive assessment for Batumi, Rustavi, Kutaisi and Tbilisi are presented<br />
below. Finally, Tbilisi team evaluated a complete list of competitiveness factors in their city<br />
in comparison to other cities.<br />
19
3. New dimension of city policies ( on the way to knowledge base economy)<br />
3.1. Skilled workforce<br />
This indicator measures the total number of employed citizens in Tbilisi in the last four<br />
years. It breaks down data by type of activity in order to describe the active labor market.<br />
This data present key employment sectors in the past and show where the new jobs<br />
emerged during four years as well as those sectors which are in urgent need of<br />
improvement.<br />
Table 3-1 The employed by type of activity.<br />
(thsds. of persons) 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Agriculture hunting & forestry 0.7 3.0 2.6 6.8 3.1<br />
Mining 1.4 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.5<br />
Manufacturing 24.9 28.4 29.8 33.9 39.0<br />
Electricity, gas & water supply 7.6 7.9 5.9 7.6 7.9<br />
Construction 10.4 12.8 17.0 15.4 11.6<br />
Wholesale & retail trade, repair of motor<br />
vehicles & personal & household goods 44.5 78.2 73.3 71.1 64.4<br />
Hotels and restaurants 5.8 5.7 6.4 7.7 6.6<br />
Transport, storage & communication 19.5 24.6 25.8 21.2 21.9<br />
Financial intermediation 0.2 3.4 4.1 5.2 6.1<br />
Real estate renting & business activities 11.2 10.7 19.9 16.7 15.2<br />
Public administration & defense, social<br />
security 43.2 37.9 32.5 29.1<br />
Education, healthcare & social work 37.3 64.3 63.7 67.6 69.1<br />
Other community, social and personal<br />
services activities 6.7 31.3 23.3 19.9 19.7<br />
Household economy with hired<br />
employment 5.1 5.3 6.5 8.4<br />
Exterritorial organizations & bodies 0.3 1.9 2.9 2.5<br />
Non identified<br />
Total 170.2 319.5 317.0 315.6 305.1<br />
More careful observation of the trends on the local labor market is also carried out in the<br />
districts of Tbilisi. Its results show that every year there are less registered vacancies and,<br />
at the same time, there are fewer job seekers. It results from the fact that people find jobs<br />
outside the labor market institutions operating in Tbilisi. The districts where workers are<br />
most looked for are Saburtalo-Vake oraz Didube-Chuhureti, while the district where the<br />
number of job seekers is the highest (several times more than in other parts of the city) is<br />
Isani-Samgori. It is worth mentioning that it is the district with the largest share of people in<br />
productive age.<br />
20
3.2. Clusters<br />
Clusters has become a new tool for developing local and regional economic development<br />
strategies. City economies can grow around dynamic clusters which offer firms the best<br />
external spillovers and synergies. City representatives need a tool that would allow them<br />
to identify local promising clusters, that have growth potential, can generate new work<br />
places and can be competitive at international markets. Analysis is intended to help the<br />
city leaders to better allocate resources intended for city economic development by<br />
focusing investment in local business activity toward growing clusters and by convincing<br />
firms to locate in these clusters.<br />
The methodology that was utilized for the identification of promising industrial clusters in<br />
Tbilisi is based on the analysis of market attractiveness developed by McKinsey &<br />
Company to improve the allocation of corporate funds toward investments in new<br />
markets.<br />
An aim of McKinsey & Co’s analysis is to assess the attractiveness of a market using a<br />
multitude of indicators. In their opinion it better reflects the complexities of a sector and<br />
allow to understand that market attractiveness is a function of several various<br />
components. Indicators correspond to three major -categories that are descriptive of the<br />
market:<br />
• market potential;<br />
• market structure;<br />
• external environment.<br />
Several sub-categories fall under each of these three. The market potential is assessed<br />
by estimating the market size, market saturation, and the market growth rate. Market<br />
structure is composed of suppliers, buyers, substitute products, and intensity of rivalry.<br />
The external environment comprises of the general economic conditions, political<br />
situation, technology, and societal factors.<br />
Each sub-category is assessed using a set of quantitative or qualitative data using<br />
attractiveness ranges. To final evaluation they weigh each sub-category score by its<br />
relative percentage importance to market attractiveness. The weights to each subcategory<br />
score are subjective, depending on their relative importance, but when summed<br />
they must add to 100 percent. The weighted scores are then summed to give a final score<br />
of market attractiveness that ranges from a least attractive score to most attractive score.<br />
21
The clusters have been assessed in three categories: of their market potential, market<br />
structure and environment.<br />
Financial cluster<br />
The financial cluster has a high market potential and a medium potential of products<br />
currently offered in Tbilisi. It also demonstrates a medium rate of the job market increase<br />
as well as a medium salary level. As for the market structure the financial cluster has an<br />
advantage of the lack of substitutes and of an easy access to new technological and<br />
organisational solutions. The environment means mainly the application of new<br />
technologies. The political situation in the country as well as its economic situation are<br />
moderately attractive. Social indices indicate low attractiveness for the cluster’s services,<br />
which probably results from the general economic situation of both local residents and<br />
businesses. The financial cluster has received a general mark of 1.1 (the maximum mark<br />
is 2.0), which means that the cluster’s attractiveness and its growth perspectives slightly<br />
exceed the medium level. It should be noted, however, that the cluster is going to develop<br />
more dynamically when the local economy and the local residents’ economic situation<br />
grow.<br />
Education cluster<br />
The education cluster demonstrates high growth potential due to the increased demand<br />
for re-training services for adults and young people’s educational needs. Because of the<br />
economic conditions in which local educational organisations operate the existing<br />
education product has a medium growth potential. Over-supply of teachers as well as low<br />
salaries do not provide favourable conditions for higher benefits and more employment in<br />
the sector. The sector market structure and its environment are highly attractive due to<br />
many customers, the shortage of alternatives, the political situation and social<br />
expectations. Low marks concerning the cluster’s attractiveness result from the<br />
employment and salary growth parameters, insufficient use of new technologies as well<br />
as from low productivity. The constructed corporate city development plans should<br />
particularly focus on the education cluster. With its good didactic and training facilities, a<br />
market oriented offer and highly qualified stuff the cluster will obviously become one of the<br />
fastest growing segments of local market. Its potential will be even more important as a<br />
support to one of the main factors of the city competitiveness, i.e. the skilled workforce<br />
22
Real estate cluster.<br />
The analysis of processes occurring on the real estate market requires long time series,<br />
because their nature is related to long-term trade cycles. In case of Tbilisi is a difficult task<br />
due to the economic transformation and political changes. Moreover, the reliability of data<br />
collected in previous years is undermined by the discrepancies between the official and<br />
market prices. The real estate and construction cluster in Tbilisi is characterized by high<br />
dynamics of the market potential and high potential of product growth. The parameters<br />
that apparently diminish its attractiveness include strong competition and people’s low<br />
economic potential. It is obvious that an important element of the cluster growth is the<br />
programmed aiming at keeping systematic record of available land, which will allow the<br />
city to build a land market. The economic development is going to stimulate the real<br />
estate market both in the housing construction sector and in office, storage and industrial<br />
construction sector. Also the demand for new operating areas for trade companies is<br />
going to grow.<br />
Transportation cluster.<br />
The attractiveness of the cluster related to transport and logistics companies results<br />
mainly from the geographical location of Tbilisi where main Georgian and international<br />
transport routes meet.<br />
The globalization of manufacturing and the related supply chains increase the demand for<br />
transport services. Logistics is getting increasingly important not only in Georgia itself, but<br />
also as a part of international economic relations. When assessing the attractiveness of<br />
the cluster the high marks have been given to the development potential and the products<br />
(services) growth potential. The general mark of 1.2 places the cluster slightly below the<br />
average, but the worldwide trends indicate that this cluster will develop dynamically in the<br />
future.<br />
The growth of commodity transportation logistics is first of all related to the economic<br />
activity and is defined as the industry task. Main areas of the city intervention include<br />
mainly giving access to developed land, promoting innovation and workforce training<br />
Industry cluster.<br />
The industry cluster has been marked as the least attractive. The old system left<br />
businesses closely dependent on the Russian markets and carrying the burden of high<br />
fixed costs. Consequently most of traditional industry companies closed down. Because<br />
of growing productivity, that has resulted from the use of new technologies, and stronger<br />
competition mainly of Asiatic countries the industrial sector is not very attractive. Apart<br />
form highly rated political situation and social indices the other attractiveness parameters<br />
of the cluster demonstrate low values. Therefore, it has been assessed well below the<br />
average. The revitalization of buildings and warehouses that used to belong to closeddown<br />
production plants should become one of the priorities while creating the economic<br />
development plan for Tbilisi. Also the workers who have been made redundant should be<br />
re-trained and instructed how to find new jobs.<br />
23
Creative cluster<br />
The support for the development of small and medium businesses entering new sectors<br />
of new economy and using latest organizational and technological solutions should be a<br />
key element of Tbilisi economic development strategy. The cluster has been marked 1.2,<br />
which means that its attractiveness is above the average. It is its market growth potential<br />
and the potential of created products that should be assessed particularly high. In the<br />
situation when the traditional sectors of economy have collapsed as a result of economic<br />
and political transformation, small and medium enterprises generate the largest number of<br />
jobs. It is SMEs that fuel local economy and implement innovative solutions. Thanks to the<br />
city’s support for projects dealing with micro credits, credit security funds,<br />
entrepreneurship incubators, technology parks, promotion of local business, etc. the<br />
cluster is likely to grow the fastest and, consequently, to create new jobs. The cooperation<br />
of local authorities and the local business can contribute to improving not only the city<br />
economic parameters but also the local quality of life and the standards of offered<br />
services. In the longer perspective the companies in this sector are going to generate<br />
larger and larger share of the added value and attract more and more external capital that<br />
will finance new investments.<br />
Tourist cluster<br />
The tourist cluster has received the highest mark of all the identified potential clusters. Its<br />
attractiveness results from the high market potential, the high potential of products<br />
(services) growth as well as of the high quality of its environment. Thanks to its cultural,<br />
architectural, social and historical values the tourist cluster is likely to make the city<br />
attractive to both occasional visitors and organized groups. The large number of financial<br />
institutions, international business corporations and support organizations operating in<br />
Tbilisi is a good basis for creating a wide range of offers for business tourism. Thanks to<br />
the stable political and economic situation a growing number of visitors are interested in<br />
Tbilisi, as well as in Georgia. Tourist potential includes the historic buildings, local culture<br />
and cuisine as well as local landscapes and nature. Also in this case the city should<br />
initiate and support projects helping local tourist industry who are aiming at building an<br />
integrated system of tourist information and a complex offer addressed to various types of<br />
tourism. The integration of the environment institutions can have a positive effect on the<br />
quality of the tourist offer<br />
24
3.3. Start ups<br />
Table 3-2 Number of new registered entities by regions<br />
Number of new registered entities by regions<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
GEORGIA- TOTAL 14585 12402 14841 25324 29978<br />
of which<br />
City of Tbilisi 5989 6316 8939 15534 19220<br />
Apkhazeti A.R. 301 163 91 19 19<br />
Ajara A.R. 1213 320 512 734 1039<br />
Guria 386 106 126 752 549<br />
Imereti 1686 824 781 636 1787<br />
Kakheti 960 1866 226 306 613<br />
Mtskheta- Mtianeti 622 386 430 444 407<br />
Racha- Lechkhumi&Kvemo<br />
Svaneti 206 133 75 46 80<br />
Samegrelo- Zemo Svaneti 1280 807 955 2564 2480<br />
Samtskhe- Javakheti 153 302 175 192 388<br />
Kvemo Kartli 910 850 1343 3032 2417<br />
Shida Kartli 1253 662 1533 1061 882<br />
Table 3-3 Number of new businesses by sector in Tbilisi.<br />
Units 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Entities – total 4626 5989 6316 8939<br />
Of which: 0 0 0 0<br />
Agriculture, hunting and forestry 14 3 10 10<br />
Fishing 0 2 0 1<br />
Mining and quarrying 6 1 2 5<br />
Manufacturing 159 185 296 348<br />
Electricity, gas and water supply 12 1 4 3<br />
Constructions 84 52 82 122<br />
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor<br />
vehicles, motorcycles and personal and<br />
household goods 3361 4830 4649 7009<br />
Hotels and restaurants 42 62 82 115<br />
Transport, storage and communication 111 64 76 151<br />
Financial intermediation 25 10 40 30<br />
Real estate, renting and business activities 195 139 186 270<br />
Public administration and defense; compulsory<br />
social security 25 12 14 31<br />
Education 52 30 40 26<br />
Health and social work 40 41 34 49<br />
Other community, social and personal service<br />
activities 499 557 801 768<br />
Private households with employed persons 0 0 0 0<br />
Extra-territorial organizations and bodies 1 0 0 1<br />
25
From the city’s economic policy point of view the dynamics and industrial structure of new<br />
businesses are extremely important.<br />
In each of the analyzed years the number of businesses set up in Tbilisi grew. The only<br />
industry where this dynamics has been slowing down is electricity, gas and water supply,<br />
but this area is strongly controlled by the state and free market principles are non-existent<br />
there. Another such area includes agriculture, hunting and forestry, i.e. industries that are<br />
not technologically advanced and therefore not attractive. The third sector of poor<br />
dynamics is education. In this case the reason for slower growth of businesses is heavy<br />
saturation of the market with traditional educational services (schools, universities). The<br />
number of businesses in other areas is increasing. Thus it seems necessary to carry out<br />
further research in order to answer the question how long newly established companies<br />
can survive and how they will develop in the future.<br />
3.4. Quality of place<br />
The Government of Georgia established the amounts of social assistance for the families<br />
below the poverty margin which depend on the number of members of registered socially<br />
vulnerable families at the moment of allocation of the welfare benefit.<br />
The amounts are as follows: for single-member families – 38 GEL; for two-member<br />
families – 55 GEL; for three-member families – 70 GEL; for four-member families – 85<br />
GEL; for five-member families – 100 GEL; for six-member families – 115 GEL; for sevenmember<br />
families – 125 GEL. For the families with eight and more members 10 GEL<br />
assistance is added for the eighth and each additional member.<br />
On 30 May 2006 in Tbilisi there were 95 749 people living in 33 349 families who<br />
considered themselves being in extreme poverty according to their socio-economic status<br />
and who expressed the wish to receive social assistance. Both by number of families and<br />
number of population, the majority of the registered families live in Gldani-Nadzaladevi<br />
(32.0%) and Isani-Samgori districts (23.0%), while the minority of registered families<br />
inhabit Vake-Saburtalo district (12.4%). The statistics indicate that the living conditions of<br />
the registered population are extremely hard. Considering the cash-based add-ins of all<br />
types, 37.2% of total financial income of registered population are old age pensions,<br />
27.1% - salaries and 20.1% - income from individual business activity.<br />
According to the declared data, total income of the last one month of the registered<br />
socially vulnerable population amounted to 3,082,604 GEL that is 32.1 GEL per person<br />
for the registered category of population, and this indicator represents only 32.5% of<br />
minimum living costs according to the Department of Statistics as of January 1, 2006<br />
(19.6% under old indicators).<br />
26
3.5. Tbilisi territorial structure<br />
3.5.1. Basic historical stages<br />
Contemporary territorial structure of Tbilisi was formed in the process of city historical<br />
development as a result of internal and external factors impact. This process consists of<br />
several emphatic chronological stages.<br />
Feudal age (from recognition of Tbilisi as a capital city to the end of the XVIII century). The<br />
city is developed on both embankments of the river Mtkvari, in the limited territorial<br />
conditions – basically, within the city fence. In the end of this period can be observed the<br />
trend of moving out of the fence in the mode of external district.<br />
Period of Russian empire (1801-1917) - The city self-defensive surrounding is losing<br />
significance, Tbilisi first invades in higher Plato of the right embankment of the river<br />
Mtkvari; on the left embankment German colony is established; later occurs its and<br />
outskirt countries incorporation into Tbilisi administrative boarders. The city acquires the<br />
trend of linear development, basically in the upper direction of the river Mtkvari.<br />
Coexistence of ancient “Asian” and modern “European” parts is formed like metaphoric<br />
description of “double-face Ianus”.<br />
Short term existence of Georgian democratic republic (1918-1921) added nothing to<br />
Tbilisi in terms of territorial development.<br />
Soviet period (1921-1991) was marked with emphatic increase of capital population and<br />
its territory. All parameters of the city development were regulated by General plans; In<br />
the Soviet period, since 1934, 3 general plans had been adopted; The calculating period<br />
of the last of which was accounted till 2000. According to the general plan, residential<br />
massifs, industrial-storage zones are created in the peripheries, social-cultural and<br />
storage-technical infrastructure are developed; For the first time, attention is paid to the<br />
urban heritage; also considerable attention is paid to the city green plants and suburban<br />
recreational zones.<br />
Period of Independence (1991- till now). In recent years the city has been developing on<br />
behalf of the internal territorial resources, often, contradictional to the emerged building<br />
process and without taking into consideration interests of the residents. Under the<br />
conditions of reducing Tbilisi population number and beginning suburbanization, in the<br />
end of 2006 emphatic expansion of the capital administrative boarders (recently created<br />
Didgori region) and separating of the “Old Tbilisi” administrative region acquires a new<br />
space to the capital urban problem. This challenge should be answered by the<br />
announced contest on composing “general plan of Tbilisi land use”.<br />
27
3.5.2. Spatial structure<br />
Such immanent feature of Tbilisi spatial development as linear was naturally reflected in<br />
the configuration of its centre. Logical Urban researches held yet in the Soviet period,<br />
proved that entire city centre of Tbilisi is developing linear along the river Mtkvari gorge.<br />
Localization of city forming objects and mental maps of Tbilisi residents make this fact<br />
evident.<br />
Central structures expose general trends of development upper of the river Mtkvari;<br />
Although lately, the desire of allocating city forming objects within “Old Tbilisi” and in the<br />
direction of the flow of Mtkvari has been emphasizing. Thus, Tbilisi common city center<br />
territorially expands from the Freedom square in two directions.<br />
First and basic, on the right embankment of the river Mtkvari implies Rustaveli Avenue,<br />
acquires several branches at the Philharmonic buildings in the direction of Merab Kostava<br />
and Melikishvili streets, moving into the Ilia Chavchavadze Avenue, Konstantine<br />
Gamsakhurdia street and Vazha-Phshavela Avenue. Simultaneously center forming<br />
functions of David the builder and Akaki Tsereteli Avenues are being developed.<br />
The second direction of the city develops from the Freedom Square including the old city<br />
and, then in the directions of Avlabari-Isani and Ortachala with linear branches.<br />
Thus, the features of the Tbilisi common city center are:<br />
• Linear and dynamic character;<br />
• Expansion of the linear structures on behalf of the streets;<br />
• Poor withy functional-planning links between the parallel central axises;<br />
• Increasingly emphasized importance of the old city;<br />
• Dispersive development of the city forming objects.<br />
Such features of the Tbilisi centre makes difficult identification of the centre core.<br />
More simple is pointing out the transit and commercial corridors. Tbilisi located in the<br />
TRACECA corridor is forced to let pass international cargo flows via its embankment,<br />
because of the damaged condition of the Tbilisi sea beyond road. These embankments,<br />
essentially, are the only draught highways on the whole territory of Tbilisi. For now the<br />
issue on cutting Kakheti highway till Avchala is being worked out, what will immensely<br />
unload the city centre.<br />
Coming out of the specific location of the Tbilisi relief (differences between the heights of<br />
the river Mtkvari shores) widthy links are more complicated. The railway line within the city<br />
creates the same problem; overcoming of the railway line for the aboveground transport is<br />
possible only in two places, with making distance of 5 kilometres between them.<br />
Implementation of viaduct in the direction of Didube-Nadzaladevi accounted in general<br />
plan is far from realizing.<br />
28
Coming out of the linear configuration of the territorial structure, large residential districts,<br />
basically, were constructed in the North and North-West, also in the South-East parts of<br />
the city. Their construction was performed on the precious agricultural lands, what was<br />
natural in Soviet period in the conditions of extensive assimilating of the city territories.<br />
As a result of expansion of Tbilisi territory in 2006 the capital city assimilated part of the<br />
Mtskheta and Gardabani districts. Consequently, the diversified problem of functioning of<br />
the country like residential areas in the joined part has become very actual. Social-cultural<br />
and engineering-technical rehabilitation or amenities will significantly increase the volume<br />
of Tbilisi housing fund, will improve its quality and become the fundament of broadening<br />
the base of city revenues.<br />
3.5.3. New trends of Tbilisi city functional-spatial development under new socialeconomic<br />
conditions<br />
New stage of Tbilisi functional-spatial development begins with re-establishment of<br />
Georgia independence (1991). But, the face of contemporary capital was essentially<br />
affected by the last period of communistic regime.<br />
At that time, in order to facilitate the political tension in September of 1987 by the directive<br />
bodies of Soviet Georgia was adopted document, which practically was the first one, that<br />
admitted some construction initiative from the side of population. The enforcement of the<br />
document was stimulated by the tragic events of 9 April of 1989; In several weeks was<br />
issued decree by Tbilisi city council executive committee, which gave permissions to the<br />
residents of the state housing fund to lead the additional building of balconies, verandas<br />
and other supporting receptacles by their financial means, following particular technical<br />
conditions. Tbilisi was covered by ugly, often unsecured additional buildings, which<br />
acquired more and more ugly look to the unsuccessful without it blocks of mass building.<br />
Little early, were taken first steps in the direction of making land accessible for the city<br />
residents, outside the city giving kitchen gardens and country houses in the form of<br />
cooperatives. In this new emerged areas land and house volumes were severely defined<br />
by norms. City residents who desired to have own land and individual houses immediately<br />
started construction; Tbilisi outskirt territory in the radius of 30-40 km immediately was<br />
covered by country like residential areas, that are now in the various stages of finish.<br />
Law project on “privatization of housing” published in September of the same year,<br />
basically was responding to the international practice, mainly, because of working out of<br />
the housing reform economic aspects and was giving hope for successful urban<br />
management under the modern social-economic conditions.<br />
29
The results of the 25 April earthquake in 2002 emphasized the complaints of the poor<br />
proprietors of the damages houses in the direction of government. Simultaneously with<br />
the lack of care rapid degradation of housing fund, in one trace with political and economic<br />
stabilization, commercial housing construction began development; social (municipal,<br />
public) housing fund was not being built in Tbilisi even till nowadays – despite the<br />
necessity, societal requirements and international recommendations.<br />
Commercial housing construction mainly was intending to concentrate on historically<br />
formed, most prestigious districts such as Vake, Vera, Mtatsminda. Prestige category,<br />
characteristic for Georgian culture, and which finally, is reflected in the prices of real<br />
estate, acquired commercial meaning and was also reflected in some normative acts.<br />
New multi-storied houses were often built without accounting accurate city constructive<br />
situation, sanitary-hygienic or housing norms, despite the protests of residents. Today its<br />
already evident, that such tightening of building in prestigious districts caused ecological<br />
problems, surplus of individual transport, overloading of social-cultural and engineeringtechnical<br />
infrastructure, and finally, decline of urban environment quality.<br />
In recent years in the sector of housing construction developer activities acquired more<br />
civilized look. It is worth to mention, that developer activities is expanding in terms of<br />
territory and it is moving to the regions near to the centre (Saburtalo); and recently to the<br />
regions, early considered not to be prestigious.<br />
In the terms of above, best example is Avlabari district, which despite its features (central<br />
position, good micro-climate, transport infrastructure, best view and exposition to the<br />
various parts of the country), was unevenly positioned on the lower place in the<br />
classification of prestige districts. Avlabari was being implemented such city forming<br />
activities, as construction of the Saint Trinity Cathedral and office of the President of<br />
Georgia. All above mentioned increased the district prestige and relatively price on the<br />
land.<br />
Some developers take even more accurate steps and directs its interests to yet nonprestigious<br />
territories. As an instance of this must serve start-up project called “Ortachalis<br />
Turfa” implemented by the “Arci” company in the south-East part of the city, and which<br />
attracts buyers with relatively low prices and complexity of building (with the components<br />
of social infrastructure).<br />
But, in terms of territorial attractiveness, traditional priority is on the side of housing<br />
construction at the edge of Tbilisi North and North-West (Bagebi, Didi Digomi), where<br />
important territorial resources and using of former agricultural lands made possible to<br />
create homestead building. Besides the best micro-climate conditions, prestige of this<br />
zone was also encouraged by the construction of the new Embassy of the USA.<br />
30
The latest situation, together with general trend, states on a new position destiny of<br />
country like residential areas in the Tbilisi surroundings existed yet in the end of Soviet<br />
Period. Their engineering technical and social rehabilitation will positively influence<br />
general structure of Tbilisi housing fund and will be economically useful for the city. This<br />
topic deserves deeper attention and more than that implementation of political projects.<br />
In this direction really supporting factor is expansion of Tbilisi administrative boarders in<br />
the end of 2006 on behalf of the hinterland and summer-cottage zone. on the meeting of<br />
the 30th march of 2007 Tbilisi city council (Sakrebulo) approved enhanced new fiscal<br />
zoning of Tbilisi, which will support developer activities in the newly joined territories and<br />
thus, expansion of the suburbanization process. It is important, that some companies<br />
have already taken advanced steps for construction of the residential community.<br />
3.6. Allocation of new development projects<br />
Moving into the new social-economic conditions caused dramatic changes of office and<br />
commercial objects allocation terms in the city planning structure.<br />
Market relations, mainly, were reflected in dislocation of small trading objects. In 1993 was<br />
allowed street trade practically everywhere and in every form.. It’s important to mention,<br />
that in the process of seeking own space on the market the profile and class of these<br />
small objects was somehow changed. Houses ground floors which made shelters for<br />
trading and service objects, weren’t satisfying new purpose with their first planning<br />
structure (problem of entrance from the street; engineering equipment, sanitarian<br />
conditions, non-existence of stores and secondary closets, etc.). many problems are<br />
generated from arranging downstairs in the cellars, what often was managed to<br />
accomplish using the street sidewalks. Today in the central part of the city can be noticed<br />
internal development of the offices already allocated on the ground floor, on behalf of the<br />
second, seldom the third floors. In terms of real estate must be underlined the fact, that<br />
such legal persons, as a rule, don’t participate in the management of the whole house<br />
(condominium), despite the requirements of the civic code.<br />
Early simultaneously only with the diversification of the residential house functions, was<br />
implemented departing, reducing of the structures of above mentioned large<br />
organization-establishments and degovernmentation of most of their owned buildings.<br />
Most important is the fact, that this process was being implemented omitting<br />
municipalisation stage of the real estate, with fading the urban land problem.<br />
Following stage of development is presented by promotion and construction of originally<br />
mixed function buildings, when 1-2 floors were accounted on office or trade and service<br />
objects, above which were located flats. Simultaneously some large companies were<br />
constructing separately located headquarters.<br />
New stage of creating and exploiting office spaces is construction of the special buildings,<br />
what is recently observed in Tbilisi. In this direction, it’s worth to notice basically office and<br />
trade building, which is being constructed on Ilia Chavchavadze Avenue #34, and “Axis<br />
towers” also on I. Chavchavadze Avenue. The latest is the mode of “second hand”<br />
architecture (such objects of curved prisms (forms) are planned in Istanbul and Astana),<br />
but today already announced prices dictate that These office spaces will respond to the<br />
high rate of the international classification.<br />
31
As for the mass and wholesale large trade objects (so-called “’bazrobebi”), Two of them<br />
Lilo and Navtlughi fairs are located in the South-East periphery of the city, and the<br />
attempts to move other two (to Dezertirebi market and Eliava street) to the North-West<br />
periphery had no results and the government was forced to be contended with making<br />
them “noble” at the same places.<br />
Although, in terms of city planning, their location will dramatically damage the city<br />
environment. The casinos are concentrated in the central part of the city (today, as a<br />
result of particular legislative steps only several casinos are operating in Tbilisi and there’s<br />
an idea of moving all of them to Tskhaltubo resort – like the planned measurements in<br />
Russia), newly opened restaurants are moving in the direction of Old Tbilisi or Automobile<br />
highways, basically on the Mtkvari embankment and in the North-West exit of the city.<br />
Construction of the sport-recreational objects are not following the requirements - there<br />
are only 2 modern swimming pools in Tbilisi. It’s being implemented assimilating of the<br />
water reservoirs in terms of amenities – here on the first place is “kus Tba” lake; It is<br />
followed by Lisi lake and Tbilsi sea. Internal quarter mini-field (ground) network is being<br />
expanded (basically, with artificial cover). By means of private capital new tennis ground<br />
was built in Dighomi.<br />
Energetically is being constructed Orthodox churches, besides the Saint Trinity grand<br />
Cathedral, small parochial churches network will include every residential district – as<br />
central, so peripheral. It must be separated issue of developing hotels network. World<br />
brands of hotel economy have been wildly interested in Tbilisi. They operate in several<br />
directions – reconstruction of already existed hotels, demolition of already existed building<br />
and construction of the new hotels, acquiring of city forming objects and their adaptation.<br />
At the current stage such interest from the world brands isn’t defined only by new<br />
economic interests (operating hotels completing with guests is far from normative); It must<br />
be defined as by future expectations, so by the presence factor of assimilating world<br />
geography. Besides the entrance of the hotel-business grants on Tbilisi market, network<br />
of the small hotels are being developed – due to their low prices and familiar atmosphere.<br />
But, the main problem for the city ambitions to become tourist centre still remains nonexistence<br />
of large, cheap hotels and hostels for mass tourism. We’ll also name<br />
discrepancies of the city information system (including language) and catastrophic<br />
conditions of the public toilets – as in quantity terms, so in terms of quality among the<br />
factors biasing tourism in Tbilisi.<br />
Under the conditions of distributing real estate, most attractive advantage of the industrial<br />
objects was considered to be territories occupied by the latest. It was particularly essential<br />
in the central zones and the ones near it. In the years of Independence most part of the<br />
Tbilisi industrial objects stopped functioning; Engines and equipments were sold as black<br />
scrap metals; And the buildings itself in terms of modern technologies, didn’t make any<br />
sense anymore. Instead of it, increased the interests of the builders to the territories<br />
occupied by the above mentioned objects. On some of this territory already is<br />
implementing construction of commercial housing (for example, silk weaving plant territory<br />
in Vera district). Together with this, still exist such large industrial zones, which don’t yet<br />
rise interest among developers (for instance, industrial zone of Ulianovka); Converse of<br />
such zones would be facilitated in the case of supporting steps taken by state/city.<br />
32
Tbilisi, as a capital of the country takes functions of the central and city government, which<br />
is reflected in the location of administrative institutional structures and relevant objects.<br />
Central functions are mainly gathered in the centre of Tbilisi, but also there are some<br />
exceptions. The example of territorial decentralization effort is the Constitutional Court,<br />
moving of which was planned at first in the direction to the city of Mtskheta and now to the<br />
city of Kutaisi. New residence of the President of Georgia is being built in the district of<br />
Avlabari, which has a prospect for urban renewal.<br />
As for the city administration, as a result of new reform “Greater Tbilisi” consists of 7<br />
administrational districts. Their overwhelming sizes and the difficulties with access to the<br />
district administrations (so-called “gamgeoba”) doesn’t respond to such fundamental<br />
principles of the local self-government as subsidiary and, also the historically formed<br />
tradition of structuring Tbilisi territory as natural community.<br />
Under Tbilisi conditions it’s very important to keep public spaces. As a result of<br />
unanalyzed and often crime like privatization, the part of such important elements of the<br />
city space as embankments, river channel and city square moved into the hands of the<br />
private capital. Most harmful was the privatization of such important for the city objects<br />
against the societal opinion, as Rikhis Ubani on the left embankment of the river Mtkvari,<br />
within the historical core of the city.<br />
Sport-recreational objects are suffering from the attacks of the builders. It’s already<br />
implementing or is starting building of such objects as the river Vere gorge, which was<br />
forming as the children city “Mziuri” in the Soviet period; Hippodrome of Tbilisi, stadium<br />
territory in Avlabari, etc. Tbilisi greenery is also under the pressure (residential house in<br />
Alexander garden, separating territories in the park of Vake and near wood-parks for the<br />
Embassies and Football Federation, construction of elite residential houses in Bagebi,<br />
etc.).<br />
Generally, may be said that Tbilisi now is in the transitional stage of getting familiar with<br />
modern social-economic conditions and relations of its functional-spatial organization and<br />
planning structure. Action in every particular case of urban development is an unique<br />
combination of multi and often subjective or contradictional factors. Following the maturing<br />
of the real estate market and generally market relations, Tbilisi spatial-territorial<br />
development, distribution of various functions, their restructuring and formation of modern<br />
body of the city will become more comprehensive, adequate and forecasting, what will<br />
finally maintain economic development of Tbilisi, as a large urban centre.<br />
33
4. Tbilisi economy<br />
Tbilisi is on the way to becoming a regional center, Tbilisi’s relationships with the rest of<br />
the country should naturally be transformed. The role of cities as major actors on the<br />
world economy stage demands rethinking the whole approach to urban areas and their<br />
role in economic growth and improving quality of life. This rethinking is required not only<br />
within cities, but at the national level. City has not only the value of itself, but can mean<br />
even more in context of the whole region. The realities of a global economy dictate that all<br />
levels of government reevaluate their understanding of the role of cities, and their policies<br />
and approaches towards cities and towns. While each city is developing its own solutions,<br />
particular group of them should benefit from working together to develop and implement<br />
an integrated national, approach to advancing the economies of major urban centers.<br />
Funding and resources must now be directed toward supporting the transition to a<br />
knowledge economy, in the same way that the government supported the resource<br />
sector, and traditional manufacturing industries in the past. Central government<br />
representatives need to take into account the likely impacts of their policy and program<br />
decisions on urban economies. The emerging role of cities has been recognized round<br />
the world and is being exploited as a engines of national economic growth. A wide range<br />
of innovative initiatives and institutions are being put in place to more effectively respond<br />
to the changing context for cities.<br />
4.1. Economic active population<br />
Economic active population<br />
Table 4-1 Economic active population<br />
Economic active population (thds people)<br />
Georgia- total Tbilisi Tbilisi share %<br />
2001 2113.3 434.5 20.6<br />
2002 2104.2 448.5 21.3<br />
2003 2050.8 429 20.9<br />
2004 2041 426.9 20.9<br />
2005 2023.9 429.8 21.2<br />
34
Table 4-2 Economic active population / total population 2001 - 2005<br />
4.2. Employment<br />
While we can observe the decreasing number of economically active population in<br />
Georgia and Tbilisi during this period, the capital has improved its situation in the last<br />
years and its share in national economically active population has increased. It visible<br />
that the share of economically active population in whole community is still much smaller<br />
in Tbilisi than in the rest of the country.<br />
Employment in business sector by regions<br />
Chart 4-1 Employed in business sector by regions<br />
Economic active population (thds people) / Total population (%)<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2001 48.0 39.9<br />
2002 48.1 41.5<br />
2003 47.2 39.6<br />
2004 47.3 39.3<br />
2005 46.8 39.3<br />
400 000<br />
Employment in business sector in regions in 2006<br />
300 000<br />
100%<br />
3,64% 1,96% 1,88% 1,37% 0,56%<br />
3,82%<br />
5,96%<br />
7,75%<br />
80%<br />
Employment<br />
200 000<br />
53,76%<br />
11,04%<br />
8,25%<br />
60%<br />
Percent<br />
40%<br />
100 000<br />
182 488<br />
20%<br />
0<br />
ShidaKartli<br />
Tbilisi<br />
37 479 28 005 26 294 20 245 12 966 12 347 6 668 6 396 4 667 1 902<br />
Imereti<br />
Adjara<br />
0%<br />
Guria<br />
Kakheti<br />
SamegreloSvaneti<br />
MchetaMtianeti<br />
SamtskheJavaheti<br />
KvemoKartli<br />
RachaLechkhumi<br />
35
Employment in business sector in Tbilisi<br />
Table 4-1 Employment in Tbilisi<br />
Employment ( thds people)<br />
Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />
2001 708.7 323.8 45.7<br />
2002 681.7 319.5 46.9<br />
2003 723.8 317 43.8<br />
2004 722.4 315.8 43.7<br />
Structure of employment<br />
Table 4-2 Structure of employment In Tbilisi<br />
Structure of employment In Tbilisi 2004 2005<br />
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 6.8 3.1<br />
Mining 0.6 0.5<br />
Manufacturing 33.9 39<br />
Electricity, gas, water supply 7.6 7.9<br />
Constructions 15.4 11.6<br />
Trade and Utilities 71.1 64.4<br />
Hotels and Restaurants 7.7 6.6<br />
Transport and storage, communications 21.2 21.9<br />
Financial intermediation 5.2 6.1<br />
Real estate renting, business activities 16.7 15.2<br />
Public administration & defense 32.5 29.1<br />
Education, Health, social services 67.6 69.1<br />
Other community, social and personal services<br />
activities 19.9 19.7<br />
Private house economy with hired employment 6.5 8.4<br />
Exterritorial organizations 2.9 2.5<br />
Total 315.6 305.1<br />
While the trade and utilities employ the most of workforce, their share decries. Industrial<br />
companies after are slowly improving the crisis. The reforms reduced the public<br />
administration share in the job market.<br />
36
4.3. Number of firms by sector<br />
Table 4-3 Number of registered entities by kind of economic activity (by the end of year; unit).<br />
1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Entities – total 8411 30701 35327 41316 47632 56571<br />
of which:<br />
Agriculture, hunting and forestry 202 216 219 229 239<br />
Fishing 9 9 11 11 12<br />
Mining and quarrying 66 72 73 75 80<br />
Manufacturing 1169* 3716 3875 4060 4356 4704<br />
Electricity, gas and water supply 78 90 91 95 98<br />
Constructions 582 1299 1383 1435 1517 1639<br />
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor<br />
vehicles, motorcycles and personal and<br />
household goods 4788 15193 18554 23384 28033 35042<br />
Hotels and restaurants 938 980 1042 1124 1239<br />
Transport, storage and communication 256 2119 2230 2294 2370 2521<br />
Financial intermediation 440 465 475 515 545<br />
Real estate, renting and business activities 2340 2535 2674 2860 3130<br />
Public administration and defense; compulsory<br />
social security 295 320 332 346 377<br />
Education 477 529 559 599 625<br />
Health and social work 778 818 859 893 942<br />
Other community, social and personal service<br />
activities 1616 2740 3239 3796 4597 5365<br />
Private households with employed persons 6 6 6 6 6<br />
Extra-territorial organizations and bodies 5 6 6 6 7<br />
Table 4-4 Number of registered entities by districts of Tbilisi<br />
(end of year; unit) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Tbilisi - total 30701 35327 41316 47632 56571<br />
of which:<br />
Gldani-Nadzaladevi 5105 5890 6919 7675 8296<br />
Didube-Chugureti 7839 8937 10342 11819 14578<br />
Vake-Saburtalo 8841 10298 12398 14405 16358<br />
Mtatsminda-Krtsanisi 4435 5376 5925 6635 8116<br />
Isani-Samgori 4481 4826 5732 7098 9223<br />
Since the late 1990s the number of companies in Tbilisi, mainly the private ones, has<br />
dynamically grown. As the above tables show the highest dynamics can be observed in<br />
such sectors as industry, manufacturing, commerce and services. This tendency results<br />
from the introduction of market economy and the trend is present in the whole country. In<br />
2000 – 2004 in almost all the city districts the number of companies doubled.<br />
37
4.4. Turnover in business sector<br />
Turnover in business sector by regions<br />
Chart 4-2 Turnover in business sector by regions in 2006<br />
14 000<br />
Turnover in business sector by regions in 2006<br />
Turnover in mln GEL<br />
12 000<br />
10 000<br />
8 000<br />
6 000<br />
4 000<br />
5,8%<br />
8,72%<br />
68,01%<br />
8 529<br />
100%<br />
3,02% 2,12% 1,79% 1,12% 0,53% 0,19%<br />
3,57%<br />
5,11%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
Percent<br />
2 000<br />
20%<br />
0<br />
KvemoKartli<br />
Tbilisi<br />
1 093<br />
727 641 448 379 266 225 141 67 24<br />
Adjara<br />
ShidaKartli<br />
Kakheti<br />
Imereti<br />
Guria<br />
SamegreloSvaneti<br />
MchetaMtianeti<br />
SamtskheJavaheti<br />
0%<br />
RachaLechkhumi<br />
The indicators show how strong economic position of Tbilisi is in the country. Tbilisi<br />
economic share is much higher than its population’s share and the higher economic<br />
growth strengthens Tbilisi’s future position.<br />
Turnover in business sector in Tbilisi<br />
Table 4-5 Turnover in business sector in mln GEL<br />
Turnover in business sector in mln GEL<br />
Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />
2001 3975.2 2133.5 53.7<br />
2002 4595.6 2739.7 59.6<br />
2003 5523 3330 60.3<br />
2004 7248.4 4455.7 61.5<br />
2005 10076.3 6352.8 63.0<br />
38
Turnover and employment<br />
Table 4-6 Turnover in business sector and employment<br />
Turnover in business sector / Employed<br />
Georgia- total<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2001 5.6 6.6<br />
2002 6.7 8.6<br />
2003 7.6 10.5<br />
2004 10.0 14.1<br />
Chart 4-3 Volume of turnover per employee in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
2005<br />
Volume of turnover per employee in business<br />
sector in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
25906,70<br />
33616,30<br />
Georgia<br />
Tbilisi<br />
2004<br />
22456,20<br />
29907,20<br />
YEARS<br />
2003<br />
18546,30<br />
23504,70<br />
2002<br />
15252,10<br />
19084,50<br />
2001<br />
15188,50<br />
12685,30<br />
0 10000 20000 30000 40000<br />
Volume in GEL<br />
Tbilisi economic share is much higher than its population’s share and the higher economic<br />
growth strengthens Tbilisi’s future position. The turnover per employee rate shows how<br />
much more effective Tbilisi companies are. As a result wages are also higher in Tbilisi<br />
than in the whole country.<br />
39
4.5. Earnings<br />
Earnings in business sector by regions<br />
Chart 4-4 Average monthly earnings in business sector by regions in 2006<br />
250<br />
Avarage monthly earnings in business sector by regions in 2006<br />
200<br />
Earnings in GEL<br />
150<br />
100<br />
229<br />
223<br />
202<br />
198<br />
178<br />
162<br />
153<br />
50<br />
124<br />
117<br />
100<br />
91<br />
0<br />
KvemoKartli<br />
SamegreloSvaneti<br />
MchetaMtianeti<br />
SamtskheJavaheti<br />
RachaLechkhumi<br />
Kakheti<br />
ShidaKartli<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Adjara<br />
Imereti<br />
Guria<br />
Earnings in business sector in Tbilisi<br />
Table 4-7 Earnings in business sector in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
Earnings in business sector ( in GEL/ month)<br />
Georgia- total Tbilisi share %<br />
2001 108.4 128.6 118.6<br />
2002 119.9 132.4 110.4<br />
2003 139.4 154.8 111.0<br />
2004 161.6 184.9 114.4<br />
2005 204.5 229.4 112.2<br />
40
Table 4-8 Average monthly wages in sectors<br />
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Average monthly<br />
wages (in GEL):<br />
Total in the country 52,1 67,1 76,8 83,6 90,6 103,6 107,2 118,3<br />
economy<br />
In the state sector 43,9 55,3 62,1 63,9 70,4 75,2 78,8 91,4<br />
In the private<br />
sector<br />
56,6 73,0 83,9 93,5 102,0 120,0 122,0 132,8<br />
Average monthly<br />
wages (in GEL):<br />
In industry 63,8 80,6 86,7 94,0 115,1 138,4 127,3 142,1<br />
In agriculture 36,7 41,5 51,6 89,0 82,7 81,1 82,7 76,4<br />
In service sector 50,4 65,0 75,2 80,8 86,0 96,8 103,9 114,0<br />
In banking financial<br />
sector<br />
87,1 102,2 131,4 100,6 107,6 177,1 158,6 216,7<br />
- Rise in salaries has been observed. The best paid jobs are in the construction cluster.<br />
The average pay in this cluster is 30% higher than in the whole Tbilisi business sector and<br />
its salaries rose the most in the last examined years, i.e. 2005-2006. Another cluster<br />
where the salaries are higher than the business cluster average is the industry cluster<br />
where the significant rise in salaries – by about 50% - took place last year. The lowest<br />
salaries, not exceeding 220 GEL, were earned in the tourist cluster, although they did rise<br />
by 30% in the last examined year. Also, the pay level offered on this market in the three<br />
last examined years (2004-2006) was 30% lower than the salaries in the whole business<br />
cluster. The salaries in the trade, repair of vehicles, personal and household goods cluster<br />
grew considerably in the last examined year (2005-2006) and are comparable with the<br />
mean salary levels in the whole business sector. In the previous years the salaries rose<br />
gradually, but no more than by 10% yearly.<br />
- The comparative analysis of the turnover and employment in 2001-2006 in Tbilisi and<br />
Georgia demonstrates a strong correlation between the processes taking place on the<br />
examined markets in the Georgian national economy and in the economy of Tbilisi. The<br />
tendencies observed in Tbilisi have their reflection in the tendencies happening nationally,<br />
which is due mainly to the fact that Tbilisi economy in the area of the examined clusters<br />
accounts for over 50% of the national turnover and employment.<br />
41
4.6. General data of external trade<br />
Table 4-9 Georgian external trade<br />
General data on Georgian external trade (mln USD)<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Exports 345,9 461,4 646,9 865,5 992,5<br />
Imports 795,5 1141,2 1845,6 2490 3677,8<br />
Balance -449,6 -679,8 -1198,7 -1624,5 -2685,2<br />
Table 4-10 External trade by groups of countries<br />
Georgian external trade by groups of countries<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Total Exports 345,9 461,4 646,9 865,5 992,5<br />
Of which:<br />
CIS countries 168,7 224,8 327,6 407,2 394,7<br />
Black Sea Economic Cooperation<br />
Organization countries 180,2 250,3 343,2 498,8 505<br />
GUAM 42,1 46,7 41,1 120,6 149,3<br />
European Union countries 63,2 81,6 111,4 165,2 188,5<br />
Organization of Economic Co- operation<br />
and Development countries 155,6 212,4 272 360,7 423,1<br />
Total Imports 795,5 1141,2 1845,6 2490 3677,8<br />
Of which:<br />
CIS countries 292,2 370,1 654,9 996,8 1401,5<br />
Black Sea Economic Cooperation<br />
Organization countries 389,3 499,4 853,2 1295,3 1953<br />
GUAM 139,6 175 300,5 456,8 642,1<br />
European Union countries 232,3 409,4 604,4 627,4 947,9<br />
Organization of Economic Co- operation<br />
and Development countries 411,4 625,3 946,8 1094 1709<br />
The main market for Georgian products is still the CIS. During the past few years the CIS<br />
and the EU have accounted for more than 70% of Georgia’s registered imports. Several<br />
factors and parameters related to the prospective economic development of the country<br />
provide sufficient grounds for dynamic expansion of export and import flows in Georgia.<br />
However, Georgia needs to diversify its export markets, which seems eminently possible<br />
through full utilization of its multilateral and bilateral trade arrangements as well as through<br />
the production of internationally competitive products.<br />
42
Table 4-11 Commodity positions by exports and import in 2006<br />
Commodity positions<br />
Major commodity positions by exports in 2006<br />
thsd. USD<br />
% in total<br />
exports<br />
2005 2006 2005 2006<br />
Total Exports 865454 992544 100 100<br />
Of which:<br />
Ferro- alloys 80181 89792 9,3 9<br />
Copper ores and concentrates 36386 79536 4,2 8<br />
Ferrous waste and scrap; remelting scrap ingots<br />
of iron or steel 84223 72427 9,7 7,3<br />
Other nuts, fresh or dried 70298 56567 8,1 5,7<br />
Motor cars 17915 50635 2,1 5,1<br />
Other aircraft; spacecraft and spacecraft launch<br />
vehicles 69025 49737 8 5<br />
Gold unwrought or in semimanufactured forms,<br />
or in powder form 34743 49371 4 5<br />
Mineral or chemical fertilizers, nitrogenous 35839 46631 4,1 4,7<br />
Wine of fresh grapes 81329 41051 9,4 4,1<br />
Copper waste and scrap 11503 30161 1,3 3<br />
Other products 344013 426636 39,7 43<br />
Commodity positions<br />
Major commodity positions by imports in 2006<br />
thsd. USD<br />
% in total<br />
imports<br />
2005 2006 2005 2006<br />
Total Imports 2489953 3677793 100 100<br />
Of which:<br />
Petroleum and petroleum oils 336286 443103 13,5 12<br />
Motor cars 178530 295322 7,2 8<br />
Petroleum gases and other gaseous<br />
hydrocarbons 90849 213082 3,6 5,8<br />
Medicaments put up in measured doses 92469 114545 3,7 3,1<br />
Wheat and meslin 45130 99063 1,8 2,7<br />
Sugar 78194 65589 3,1 1,8<br />
Transmission apparatus for radiotelegraphy,<br />
radio- broadcasting or television 27083 58727 1,1 1,6<br />
Automatic data processing machines and<br />
units thereof 22443 46444 0,9 1,3<br />
Motor vehicles for the transport of goods 23479 39296 0,9 1,1<br />
Chocolate and other food preparations<br />
containing cocoa 24821 33694 1 0,9<br />
Other products 1570669 2268928 63,1 61,7<br />
Georgian exports are partially concentrated on low value-added commodities such as<br />
ferrous metals, copper, aluminum, iron steel and mineral fuels. However, the dynamics of<br />
export seems to indicate that the concentration of exports on low value-added<br />
commodities will decrease gradually over time.<br />
43
4.7. Key industries of Tbilisi economy.<br />
Hotels<br />
Chart 4-5 Turnover and employment in hotels in regions in 2006<br />
Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
Hotels turnover in regions in mln GEL in 2006<br />
63,6<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
Percent<br />
Over 80% of revenue in<br />
the hotel industry is<br />
generated in Tbilisi.<br />
Two out of other<br />
regions of Georgia, i.e.<br />
Adjara and Mtsheta<br />
generate app. 10% of<br />
the turnover. The last<br />
10% are generated by<br />
the remaining regions.<br />
20%<br />
0<br />
7,5<br />
3,4<br />
Tbilisi Adjara Mtsheta<br />
Mtianeti<br />
0,7 0,4 0,1 0,1<br />
Guria Imereti Kakheti Racha<br />
Lekhumi<br />
0%<br />
4 000<br />
3 000<br />
Hotels employment in regions in 2006<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
Also, the employment in<br />
the hotel industry is the<br />
highest in Tbilisi, but<br />
Adjar and Mtshet are<br />
catching up.<br />
Employment<br />
2 000<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
Percent<br />
1 000<br />
1 668<br />
20%<br />
1 053<br />
0<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Adjara<br />
295 264<br />
142<br />
60 55 40 30 29 28<br />
0%<br />
Mtsheta Mtianeti<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Imereti<br />
Guria<br />
Kakheti<br />
Kvemo Kartli<br />
44
Construction<br />
Chart 4-6 Turnover and employment in construction in regions in 2006<br />
Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />
1 200<br />
1 000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
Construction turnover in regions in 2006<br />
760<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
Percent<br />
In 2006 Tbilisi saw<br />
the highest values in<br />
Georgia of both the<br />
turnover and the<br />
employment in<br />
construction industry<br />
200<br />
20%<br />
0<br />
80<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Adjara<br />
44 42 37 35 21 18 16 6 4<br />
0%<br />
Imereti<br />
Guria<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
Kvemo Kartli<br />
Kakheti turn<br />
Employment<br />
50 000<br />
40 000<br />
30 000<br />
20 000<br />
Construction employment in regions in 2006<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
Percent<br />
The construction<br />
industry in Tbilisi<br />
generated almost<br />
80% of total turnover<br />
and employed about<br />
60% of all the<br />
construction workers.<br />
10 000<br />
23 513<br />
25%<br />
0<br />
Kvemo Kartli<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Tbilisi<br />
3 553 3 215 2 617 1 852 1 624 1 322 1 121 682 484 359<br />
Adjara<br />
0%<br />
Imereti<br />
Kakheti<br />
Guria<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
45
Trade<br />
Chart 4-7 Turnover and employment in enterprises of trade in regions in 2006<br />
Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />
6 000<br />
5 000<br />
4 000<br />
3 000<br />
2 000<br />
Turnover in enterprises of trade, repair of<br />
vehicles, personal & household goods in regions<br />
in 2006<br />
3 693<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
Percent<br />
Also in the trade<br />
sector Tbilisi has a<br />
leading role in the<br />
regions of Georgia.<br />
About 70% of total<br />
turnover in the trade<br />
sector are<br />
generated in Tbilisi<br />
1 000<br />
20%<br />
0<br />
Tbilisi<br />
422<br />
272 194 192 146 92 86 38 22 5<br />
0%<br />
Adjara<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Guria turn<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
Imereti<br />
Kakheti<br />
Kvemo Kartlii<br />
Employment<br />
50 000<br />
40 000<br />
30 000<br />
20 000<br />
10 000<br />
Employment in enterprises of trade, repair of<br />
vehicles, personal & household goods in<br />
regions in 2006<br />
24 310<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
20%<br />
Percent<br />
Approximately 50%<br />
of people working in<br />
the trade sector are<br />
employed in Tbilisi.<br />
The fact that the<br />
employment in other<br />
parts of Georgia is<br />
rather high in relation<br />
to the declared<br />
income means that a<br />
lot of people in<br />
Georgia deal with<br />
trade to satisfy their<br />
elementary needs<br />
0<br />
Kvemo Kartli<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Guria_empl<br />
Tbilisi<br />
6 378 4 714 3 647 2 880 2 777 1 707 1 168 882 728 362<br />
Imereti<br />
Adjara<br />
0%<br />
Kakheti<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />
46
Industry<br />
Chart 4-8 Turnover and employment in Industry in regions in 2006<br />
Value of turnover in mln GEL<br />
4 000<br />
3 000<br />
2 000<br />
1 000<br />
Industry turnover in regions in 2006<br />
1 409<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
Percent<br />
In the industry sector<br />
Tbilisi has a leading role<br />
in the regions of<br />
Georgia.<br />
Over 40% of revenue in<br />
the industry is generated<br />
in Tbilisi. One out of<br />
other regions of<br />
Georgia, i.e. Kvemo<br />
Kartli generate app.<br />
Over 20% of the<br />
turnover. The last 40%<br />
are generated by the<br />
remaining regions.<br />
785<br />
0<br />
276 237<br />
104 99 82 73 64 36 29 13<br />
0%<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Abkhazja<br />
Guria<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
Imereti<br />
Adjara<br />
Kakheti<br />
Kvemo Kartli<br />
Employment<br />
100 000<br />
80 000<br />
60 000<br />
40 000<br />
Industry employment in regions in 2006<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
Percent<br />
The employment in the<br />
industry is the highest in<br />
Tbilisi, and generates<br />
over 40% of industry<br />
employment in Georgia.<br />
Other leading in<br />
employment regions are<br />
Imereti and Kvemo Kartli<br />
and generates no more<br />
than 20% each.<br />
40%<br />
20 000<br />
35 137<br />
20%<br />
0<br />
Kvemo Kartli<br />
Shida Kartli<br />
Abkhazja<br />
Samtshe Javaketi<br />
Mtshketa Mtianeti<br />
Samegrelo Zemo<br />
Tbilisi<br />
13 999<br />
10 763<br />
5 630 4 813 4 543 3 042 1 892 1 821 1 215 880 497<br />
Imereti<br />
Adjara<br />
0%<br />
Kakheti<br />
Guria<br />
Racha Lekhumi<br />
47
A thorough analysis of the tourist, construction, industry and trade clusters gives a clear<br />
picture of the situation and the processes that are taking place in the local economy of<br />
Tbilisi. The importance of the examined clusters can demonstrated by means of the<br />
following conclusions:<br />
- the examined clusters generate locally almost 80% of the national turnover in these<br />
clusters;<br />
- the employment in the examined clusters accounts for 50% - 80% of the total<br />
employment in Georgia;<br />
- a significant rise in the turnover volume (it almost doubled both nationally and in Tbilisi) is<br />
a common tendency for all the clusters, particularly in the observed period of 2004-2006;<br />
- due to the dynamic growth of the examined markets a change in the employment took<br />
place in each of them in the period of 2004-2006. The number of the jobs in the<br />
construction cluster almost doubled (not in the last year, though). After the period of falling<br />
figures since 2004 the industry cluster has been providing 10% more jobs annually and it<br />
is a cluster that generates the highest employment among the examined markets. Also<br />
the employment in the hotel industry has been growing since 2003 at a rate of 10% per<br />
year. The market of trade, repair of vehicles, personal and household goods, after a<br />
period of 2001 – 2005 when the employment was growing, has reduced its workforce<br />
below 25 000 people, i.e. to the level similar to 2003;<br />
The sector of strategic importance for the city economy is the banking sector. Although,<br />
when compared to other analyzed industries, it does not generate many jobs, but it<br />
employs staff that is better qualified and better paid than other business sector<br />
employees. This is why a descriptive analysis of the banking sector in Georgia and Tbilisi<br />
has been carried out as well. In 1994 a reform of banking sector, introduction of a two-tier<br />
banking system (National Bank of Georgia and the commercial banks). Commercial<br />
bank’s total assets comprise 31% of GDP and liabilities comprise 24%. The perspectives<br />
of Georgia becoming the financial centre for the region and regional banking would create<br />
a larger pool of capital to finance internal projects in Georgia.<br />
48
4.8. Identification of key problems facing City of Tbilisi economy<br />
Good outcomes reflecting the satisfying condition of Tbilisi economy, when compared to<br />
the rest of the country, results from the fact that the city does not face any competition as<br />
far as economic indices are concerned. Other regions perform much worse than the City<br />
of Tbilisi.<br />
The authors of new programmes of economic development have to consider the fact that<br />
their impact will not be restricted only to the metropolitan area of Tbilisi, but that they will<br />
strongly influence the national economy. The increase of economic indicators is built<br />
mainly on the growing production of low processed goods (e.g. cement, sawn wood) and<br />
on the export of raw materials (such as ores), which will not contribute to the economic<br />
growth and increased competitiveness on foreign markets. Also, these segments will not<br />
attract technology transfer and will not generate new, competitive products.<br />
As a result of economy transformation Tbilisi lost its traditional industries that were<br />
generating incomes and workplaces for decades. Schools, universities and supporting<br />
institutions were organized around them. Now, when most of old factories do not operate<br />
any more all these institutions should transform their activities or will be closed down too.<br />
To create Tbilisi new economy profile and face competition of global markets new city<br />
products should be identified and new institutional infrastructure should be developed to<br />
support key city development possibilities. Cluster networks should grow around<br />
competitive city products that will be identified. Workforce development programs should<br />
be created to support young people entering labour market and those who need to<br />
change or improve their qualifications. Schools and vocational training institutions should<br />
develop new educational programs to prepare qualified workforce for the new sectors of<br />
economy. To build foundations for knowledge-based economy the research institutions<br />
should offer companies new management and production technologies. The whole range<br />
of institutions is needed to offer funding to growing companies (credit, capital and<br />
guarantees). Business networks, organizations, consulting and marketing companies will<br />
help companies and their products enter new markets and compete with foreign<br />
companies. Public institutions should participate in the process of supporting promotion<br />
campaigns, offering good quality space and qualified workforce for all new generation of<br />
firms and institution, in order to build international reputation and recognition of the city.<br />
49
5. Vision<br />
<strong>TBILISI</strong><br />
offers wide range of services and opportunities to<br />
citizens, companies, institutions and visitors<br />
who are living, working, learning and relaxing in the city and entire region.<br />
<strong>TBILISI</strong> economic development strategy<br />
right place, right time<br />
DIRECTIONS<br />
1. Tbilisi booming regional gateway<br />
multicultural city, location of regional leading businesses<br />
2. Time for business in Tbilisi<br />
Support and space for business, money to start and grow business<br />
3. Tbilisi place to live<br />
Our home, Our neighborhood (ezo), Our community (ubani)<br />
4. Tbilisi hospitable city<br />
Improving quality services, provide needed info, prepared attraction<br />
5. People empower Tbilisi<br />
Future workforce, jobs for all, upgrade skills<br />
50
<strong>TBILISI</strong> economic development strategy<br />
right place, right time<br />
desired<br />
impact<br />
• Competitive companies<br />
• Prosperity of residents<br />
• Growing City revenues<br />
vision:<br />
Tbilisi serves residents and region<br />
strategic<br />
directions<br />
• Tbilisi booming regional gateway<br />
• Time for business in Tbilisi<br />
• Tbilisi place to live<br />
• Tbilisi hospitable city<br />
• People empower Tbilisi<br />
51
6. Strategic directions<br />
• Booming regional gateway<br />
Directing the new potential of Tbilisi towards this aim will first of all lead to stimulating the<br />
growth of the city as an internationally recognized metropolitan center. It can be achieved<br />
by means of the effective use and development of its existing research, cultural, sports<br />
and tourist potentials as well as by strengthening its role as one of the national service<br />
centers.<br />
Tbilisi, being a metropolitan area, boasts:<br />
- a significant potential in science and education,<br />
- important cultural organizations and institutions (a theater, a concert hall, a museum,<br />
art galleries, artistic societies),<br />
- numerous research organizations, business environment institutions (banks, trade fair<br />
agencies, chambers of industry and commerce, the market of real property services,<br />
business associations),<br />
- good sports and tourist facilities,<br />
- a convenient geographical location – at the crossroads of motor, rail and air routes.<br />
The problems underlying the choice of the program are:<br />
- weak links within the metropolitan area,<br />
- broadened administrative city limits and insufficiently developed metropolitan<br />
functions,<br />
- missing fast road and rail network,<br />
- insufficient transport links connecting the region and the country with the outside<br />
world.<br />
If Tbilisi develops in this direction, it will become a metropolitan area of regional, national<br />
and international importance as well as it will boost its competitiveness.<br />
The results will be:<br />
- better inwards and outwards accessibility due to the establishment of transportation<br />
system integrated with the airport,<br />
- strengthened potential of the metropolitan area due to the complementary growth of<br />
the main centers, especially in the field of research, culture and sport.<br />
52
Under these strategy directions the following implementation programs and projects are<br />
planned:<br />
Table 6-1 Programs and projects of strategic direction – Booming regional gateway<br />
Programs<br />
1. Access point to the<br />
region<br />
• Tbilisi on your way<br />
• Logistic centre<br />
Projects<br />
2. Regional meeting place • Calendar of regional events<br />
• Conferences organizer guide<br />
• Network of Caucasus cities<br />
• Caucasus media and info centers guide<br />
• Tbilisi convention bureau<br />
3. You can serves the region<br />
from Tbilisi<br />
• Doing business in Caucasus<br />
• Caucasus specialists data base<br />
• We serve Caucasus – Caucasus Yellow Pages<br />
• Financial and office centre of the region<br />
•<br />
53
• Time for business.<br />
Time for business means first of all the creation of good conditions for the development of<br />
modern economy of a regional character.<br />
The growth of Tbilisi depends on the competitiveness of local companies and on the<br />
number of new jobs. Unfortunately the city business life is not functioning well enough.<br />
The proposed development tendency results from the need to remove the barriers that<br />
local companies, both the existing ones and the set-ups, have to face. These barriers<br />
primarily include the lack of adequate infrastructure and very poor technology transfer<br />
from research centers. The aim is to provide the initial development impulse, trigger the<br />
process of starting new companies and to create the image of the city as an attractive<br />
place for doing business.<br />
The proposed solution results mainly from problems related to the local economy such<br />
as:<br />
- insufficiently developed network of business environment institutions and the lack of<br />
coordinated activities as well as the unconsolidated business community,<br />
- no coherent system of information about services, support programs and investment<br />
opportunities,<br />
- poor competitiveness of companies, the lack of innovation improvement system and<br />
the system of new technology inflow,<br />
- poor access to starting capital,<br />
- no leading sector that would be a driving power for the city.<br />
The undertaken initiatives will meet the needs of Tbilisi companies to maintain their<br />
position on the market and increase their competitiveness, create favorable conditions<br />
for stimulating business activity of local citizens as well as encourage business<br />
organizations to build a strong regional business center. The above will lead to the<br />
following results:<br />
- the increased number of companies,<br />
- introduction and the use of new technologies in production and management,<br />
- more jobs in the SME sector,<br />
- the inflow of companies from the rest of the region.<br />
The main planned initiatives are:<br />
- the establishment and development of institutions specializing in promoting<br />
entrepreneurship and innovation,<br />
- building the infrastructure for business growth,<br />
- encouraging new jobs creation,<br />
- establishing institutions that support entrepreneurship.<br />
54
Under these strategy directions the following implementation programs and projects are<br />
planned:<br />
Table 6-2 Programs and projects of strategic direction – Time for business<br />
Programs<br />
1. We support your<br />
business<br />
Projects<br />
• We help you to start and grow your business<br />
• We ask you about your problems and analyze<br />
issues you face - Business attitude surveys and<br />
analyses<br />
• We offer you information you need - Reports<br />
and business profiles<br />
• We support development of promising clusters -<br />
Clusters development<br />
• We build digital platform for our businesses<br />
• We talk directly with business community -<br />
Business round tables<br />
2. Space for your business • You can find a place to start business –<br />
Incubator<br />
• Space for your growing service company -<br />
Office units<br />
• Space for your industrial firm - Industrial units<br />
• Home of new technologies - Technology park<br />
• If you want to buy parcel to build your own real<br />
estate<br />
3. Money to start and grow<br />
your business<br />
4. Attracting Tbilisi to<br />
investors<br />
• Grants and micro credits to start business<br />
• Loans to grow business<br />
• Credit guaranties<br />
• Conferences and fairs<br />
• Targeted promotion campaigns<br />
• Investors you are our gests – one stop shop<br />
55
• A place to live.<br />
The main objectives set to follow the chosen strategic city development direction are as<br />
follows: to create conditions for a comprehensive development for Tbilisi residents, to<br />
encourage their identification with the city as well as to create a modern and functional<br />
urban space.<br />
The quality of local residents’ life depends on their dwelling conditions, natural<br />
environment and the accessibility of modern communal infrastructure. The existing<br />
housing resources do not provide every family with a separate apartment. However, the<br />
actual deficit may turn out to be larger because many apartment blocks have to be pulled<br />
down due to their technical state or land development works (new roads and others).<br />
Also, a tendency has been observed for the families to shrink in size. The city is facing<br />
the problem of recapitalization of housing and infrastructural resources. It also has a large<br />
share of poor quality urban space. These are mainly worn out buildings with insufficient<br />
facilities. Some of them are in danger of collapsing and need to be immediately pulled<br />
down. In order to lessen the housing deficit and improve local dwelling conditions it is<br />
necessary to build new houses and to modernize most of the existing ones, taking into<br />
consideration the need to upgrade the urban space and technical standards. What is<br />
more, some of the residents have limited access to water supply and disposal facilities. It<br />
seems absolutely necessary to invest in this sector in order to make the city function<br />
smoothly and enhance the local quality of life.<br />
The problems underlying the choice of the program are:<br />
- a growing number of families whose situation, mainly the material one, prevents them<br />
from maintaining their own apartment, which results in an increased demand for social<br />
housing,<br />
- insufficient supply of housing for moderate income families and young people,<br />
- arrears in renovating the city material property (housing and infrastructural<br />
resources), which has led to worsening local everyday living conditions as well as has<br />
triggered some undesirable social phenomena,<br />
- the need to revitalize and transform much of the urban functional space,<br />
- insufficient technical infrastructure in the developed areas and in the areas to be<br />
developed in future, which is hindering new constructions,<br />
- poor offer of attractive construction lots directed to high income residents,<br />
- downgraded natural environment resources.<br />
The primary objective is to improve the quality of life in Tbilisi and to increase the<br />
attractiveness of dwellings. Once this objective has been realized, the housing deficit will<br />
decrease, its quality will improve, the number of migrants will be reduced and the local<br />
economy will grow. The proposed activities are oriented at investors (the individual ones,<br />
developers, housing cooperatives, real estate and city managers, the communal<br />
infrastructure managers) and at all those who would like to settle down in Tbilisi.<br />
56
The initiatives will be as follows:<br />
- supporting the growth of housing market including the construction of apartments for<br />
rent to encourage market-related mobility and the construction of apartments for social<br />
housing purposes for the particularly disadvantaged individuals and families,<br />
- creating a reserve of developed land for housing purposes,<br />
- revitalization of degraded housing estates in order to upgrade local housing resources<br />
and to protect and renovate listed historic buildings,<br />
- supporting the transformation of post-industrial problem areas in order to animate their<br />
economic, social and environmental potentials,<br />
- revitalization of and enrichment of the natural environment resources and local leisure<br />
centers,<br />
- revitalization of the tracts of commerce and services,<br />
- revitalization of areas degraded as a result of communal, business and military<br />
activities,<br />
- creation of the program of incentives encouraging the revitalization initiatives.<br />
Under these strategy directions the following implementation programs and projects are<br />
planned:<br />
Table 6-3 Programs and projects of strategic direction – A place to live<br />
Programs<br />
Projects<br />
1. Our home • Improving your home (lifts, doors, etc.)<br />
• Coo financing for roof, door, lift and roof<br />
discharging pipes repairs<br />
• Coo financing of energy efficiency<br />
improvements<br />
• Buying new home<br />
• Buy your first apartment<br />
• We will help you to buy new apartment<br />
when you can’t live in your current flat<br />
2. Our neighborhood (ezo) • Great place to live<br />
• Coo financing for technical infrastructure<br />
• Coo financing for recreational<br />
infrastructure<br />
• Creating public meeting place and<br />
cultural facilities<br />
3. Our community (ubani) • Better services for residents<br />
• We are living together<br />
57
• The hospitable city.<br />
Culture and tourism are one of the basic elements of Tbilisi attractiveness. They are also<br />
one of the main factors determining the local quality of life and settlement decisions. This<br />
is why in the effort to make Tbilisi a friendly and hospitable city it is so important to take<br />
advantage of its cultural resources and create a system that would help to recognize and<br />
promote the city internationally and to initiate a dialogue of cultures in the region while<br />
maintaining specific symbols, values and tradition brought in by the rich Georgian<br />
culture. It can contribute to strengthening Tbilisi’s position as a service center of an extra<br />
regional importance.<br />
Tbilisi and the surrounding area should meet the information requirements characteristic<br />
for modern metropolitan areas. A complex city information including an address book and<br />
the information about some of the local facilities and organizations is regarded as a mark<br />
of the city and is used to promote its image. It is also an important element of tourist<br />
promotion and a basic tool for tourism development. All the activities are aimed at a<br />
modern and integrated City Information System (CIS) for Tbilisi and, in future, for the rest<br />
of the metropolitan area.<br />
The undertaken activities are meant to strengthen the position of Tbilisi as a metropolis<br />
which is well founded in the culture of its own, of Georgia, of the Caucasus region and<br />
outside its borders. All the actions that substantiate and encourage new cultural initiatives<br />
and tourist attractions are expected to make Tbilisi a regional center of culture and<br />
tourism.<br />
The introduction of a new visual order will make getting around easier and safer for both<br />
the visitors and the local residents (information for pedestrians). It will also improve traffic<br />
(information for motorists), which should contribute to the city attractiveness and<br />
accessibility.<br />
Moreover, it has been planned to integrate the information about the city, to invest in<br />
place and infrastructure, to create a unique and recognizable quality, to generate new<br />
cultural and tourist products, to launch promotional campaign in the region and abroad, to<br />
build and strengthen the tourist potential and recognisability of Tbilisi.<br />
58
Under these strategy directions the following implementation programs and projects are<br />
planned:<br />
Table 6-4 Programs and projects of strategic direction – The hospitable city<br />
Programs<br />
Projects<br />
1. See what Tbilisi is • We provide you needed info<br />
• City tourism guide book<br />
• Calendar of events<br />
• Tbilisi tourist product info<br />
• Tourism internet info and booking<br />
page<br />
• Video materials<br />
• Study tours for tour operators<br />
• Target countries campaign<br />
2. Stay longer • Working in Tbilisi<br />
• Being a student<br />
• We are improving quality your services<br />
• Professional guides - training<br />
programs<br />
• Tbilisi hospitality – training for<br />
non professional guides<br />
• Tbilisi quality certificates<br />
• Tourism cluster development<br />
• Market analyses and customer<br />
services<br />
• Tourism product award<br />
• Tourism souvenir award<br />
• We prepared attractions you can in joy<br />
• Development of tourism paths<br />
• Development of tourism support<br />
infrastructure<br />
• Support for cultural festivals and<br />
meetings<br />
• Tourism infrastructure and<br />
facilities<br />
59
• People empower Tbilisi.<br />
This direction in the city strategic development will aim at maintaining the city’s business<br />
position on the Georgian market as well as at improving the competitiveness of local<br />
companies and encouraging them to offer more jobs. The activities under the strategy will<br />
promote employment and reduce unemployment as well as they will make local residents<br />
more employable.<br />
Basing on the analysis of Tbilisi workforce market some vital problems have been<br />
recognized: low employment rate, high unemployment rate and a low number of the<br />
unemployed people who choose self-employment. Main activities will focus on<br />
activisation of people who are unemployed or at risk of social exclusion and on<br />
supporting these businesses who create new jobs.<br />
This strategic development aim concentrates mainly on creating jobs for school<br />
graduates because when jobs are difficult to find it is mainly the young people who have<br />
just left vocational schools and have no or little professional experience who are at risk of<br />
long-term unemployment.<br />
The local system of education has become one of the factors generating unemployment<br />
among young people because it does not respond to market requirements. The skills<br />
structure of the workforce does not meet the demand since the system is not flexible<br />
enough and the educational offer does not reflect the development tendencies of the<br />
local business.<br />
Nowadays the employers require practical skills rather than theoretical ones and they<br />
want their future staff to have extra qualifications. Therefore it is necessary for the local<br />
schools to introduce into their curriculum student job placements in order to provide their<br />
graduates with more practical skills, which will make finding a job easier for them. So, it<br />
seems important for the educational organizations of all levels to promote<br />
entrepreneurship among their students.<br />
The activities in this field will contribute to the correlation of needs and expectations of<br />
Tbilisi business with the educational offer of local schools. The projects are also going to<br />
increase the graduates’ competitiveness on the local workforce market.<br />
The objective of this part of the development strategy is to decrease the number of the<br />
unemployed graduates of vocational high schools and universities; to increase the<br />
number of students doing job placements and the number of volunteers in local<br />
companies; to encourage companies to create more job placement opportunities for<br />
students; to improve IT technology level at schools – the beneficiaries of the project –<br />
and to supply them with modern office equipment; to increase the number and improve<br />
the quality of job advisors.<br />
60
Under these strategy directions the following implementation programs and projects are<br />
planned:<br />
Table 6-5 Programs and projects of strategic direction – People empower Tbilisi<br />
Programs<br />
Projects<br />
1. Future workforce • What the labor market will offer you?<br />
• Youth Survey<br />
• Workshops and debates on labor market<br />
changes<br />
• Education – business round table<br />
• How you can become a good specialist?<br />
• Carrere paths for most needed professions<br />
• Best pupils and students fellowship<br />
• Want you be a businessman?<br />
• Best business idea awards<br />
• Workshops and debates on new economy<br />
2. You can upgrade your<br />
skills<br />
• How to find a job?<br />
• Labor market information system with an<br />
internet portal and one stop shop<br />
• Jobs data base<br />
• Labor market survey<br />
• How to upgrade your skills?<br />
• Preparation of CV and interview with<br />
employer – workshops<br />
• Language and IT trainings<br />
• Support for school and training institutions<br />
preparing citizens for work opportunities<br />
• How you can upgrade or change your qualifications?<br />
• Data base on vocational trainings<br />
• Vocational trainings for most needed<br />
specialists<br />
• Labor fairs.<br />
3. Jobs for all • Financing for new work places.<br />
• City needs you .<br />
• You can take care for your neighborhood (ubani).<br />
61
7. Strategy implementation<br />
An important rule when implementing the Plan is to follow closely the adopted procedures<br />
and make sure that everyone does their job. The principle idea of this proposal is<br />
permanent analysing and drawing conclusions from completed tasks because they form<br />
the foundation for future projects.<br />
The list of the participants in the Plan development process consisted of the<br />
representatives of:<br />
• the City residents,<br />
• key business groups,<br />
• public institutions in charge of local development,<br />
• self-government officials, local politicians,<br />
• non-governmental organisations – especially the social and economic ones.<br />
Also, specialists, outside consultants took part in the works.<br />
Local administration has to nominate the Plan coordinator. The Mayor of the City himself<br />
and through delegated specialists is responsible for the formal organisation and the Plan<br />
preparation. He is also in charge of logistics and the subject-matter side of the process.<br />
In the process the works of preparatory and conceptual character were separated from<br />
the decision-making at different stages of the Plan development.<br />
The team organisation and the allocation of tasks were based on the rule that the selected<br />
groups of specialists performed all the works that required professional skills according to<br />
the best practice principle. The teams selected in such a way could quickly come to<br />
common conclusions. It should be emphasised how vast the range of problems<br />
addressed in the Plan was. The ability to synthesize problems is very useful in this<br />
process. Decision makers and stakeholders are not involved in document preparatory<br />
works - stakeholders consult The Mayor and City Council before they will take final<br />
decisions.<br />
By the City Mayor directive the following teams should be appointed to develop the Plan:<br />
• The City Development Council – stakeholder group,<br />
• Inter-sector Team of City Development Programme,<br />
• Working Team.<br />
Phase One – team organisation and procedure adopting:<br />
• appointing the Plan Working Team,<br />
• appointing the Inter-sector Plan Team,<br />
• appointing the City Development Council,<br />
• creating the consulting group,<br />
• adopting the Plan development procedure,<br />
• selecting techniques and instruments to carry out the works,<br />
62
• adopting a detailed schedule of the Plan development.<br />
Phase Two – the assessment of the development and competitiveness level of the City<br />
as the centre of entrepreneurship that provides its residents high quality of life:<br />
• collecting and processing information about the condition and perspectives of<br />
local development, including a series of surveys,<br />
• the analysis of the City’s condition in key areas,<br />
• the analysis of the City Development Strategy and <strong>LED</strong> program implementation<br />
results,<br />
• writing reports about the analyses,<br />
• conducting the SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and<br />
threats), identifying key problems and defining development priorities.<br />
Phase three – the Plan development:<br />
• the review of strategic objectives<br />
• defining the Plan implementation indices (input, output, outcome and impact) as<br />
the basis of the monitoring system of the city development strategy<br />
implementation,<br />
• adopting the subject-matter material scope of the Plan, including the initial list of<br />
the strategic implementation projects.<br />
63
Phase four – preparing the Plan document, consultations and the approval:<br />
• gathering implementation projects, their assessment and selection,<br />
• preparing the draft Plan document,<br />
• presentation, consultations and modifications of the draft,<br />
• adopting the resolution by the City Council.<br />
8. Strategy monitoring<br />
As it has been mentioned before, the resolution concerning the Corporate City<br />
Development - the document of a strategic character - should not end the cooperation<br />
among partners involved in its realisation.<br />
The Working and Inter-sector Teams as well as the City Development Council take over<br />
the responsibility for the Plan implementation and for its updating. The Council should play<br />
the role of a main consultative body for the Mayor and the City Council of Tbilisi in the<br />
process of updating the Plan.<br />
The conditions under which the adequate updating system will be applied strongly<br />
determine formal and organisational activities, define the Plan’s characteristics and<br />
regulate the Plan development works:<br />
• step-by-step character – updated annually,<br />
• duration 3– 5 years,<br />
• working on the Plan by means of standardised forms,<br />
• accurate and clear criteria of the implementation projects selection,<br />
• application of IT tools to create and update database,<br />
• sensitivity to changes in social and economic situation as well as in legal<br />
regulations,<br />
• stable procedures, instruments and collective bodies (the teams, the Council),<br />
consultations<br />
The updating should be performed annually – having in mind that not all the data will<br />
change in a yearly cycle.<br />
Phase I<br />
The cycle starts with collecting necessary information about the level of social and<br />
economic development, the strategy implementation and accompanying phenomena.<br />
This phase also includes surveys in business and social groups. Naturally, the more data<br />
is collected, the more reasonable further steps are. At this stage it is vital to determine the<br />
cycles at which individual data will be collected and to identify the sources where they can<br />
be found.<br />
64
Phase II<br />
As in every strategic programming process what should follow next is the analysis of<br />
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and external threats the City has to face. It is a task<br />
that requires from the members of the Inter-sector Team a lot of effort and<br />
professionalism. The natural outcome of this analysis is the identification of key problems<br />
for Tbilisi development. Then, a conceptual work begins in order to decide on the ways of<br />
solving these problems, to define the priorities. These activities are performed by the Intersector<br />
Team of the City Development Programme and the City Development Council who<br />
define the development directions and recommend development priorities to the President<br />
of the City.<br />
Before the priorities are approved, the President consults the City Council commissions,<br />
local community and selected organisations.<br />
Phase III<br />
After the consultation the adopted priorities are publicly announced, which is an invitation<br />
to submit proposals of implementation projects. It is vital that the announcement of the<br />
priority development directions is addressed to all organisations and public administration<br />
institutions that are interested in implementing various projects within the announced<br />
priorities. The proposed implementation projects are submitted on standardized forms to<br />
the Working Team whose task is to compare the projects. Then the Working Team<br />
evaluates and selects the proposals. The evaluation and selection criteria are first of all<br />
based on their efficiency in implementing the adopted priorities and how well they are<br />
prepared. Then the shortlist is made of the ones that deal with the major strategic issues.<br />
After consultations with the City Council the list is eventually approved by the President.<br />
Phase IV<br />
The announcement of the list of the approved projects is the signal for the bidders to send<br />
application forms. The standardized forms helps to evaluate projects by comparing their<br />
main elements and to remain impartial. The applications are then analysed by the Plan<br />
Inter-sector Team who finally approves the projects that will contribute to working out the<br />
draft Corporate City Development Plan for Tbilisi based on the implementation objectives<br />
of the City Development Strategy. The Working Team writes the final version of the Plan.<br />
Then the President of the City consults various organisations and submits the Plan for the<br />
City Council’s approval.<br />
The implementation of the Plan requires a great deal of effort from all the participants. The<br />
course of implementation is monitored and continually adjusted due to changing<br />
conditions and unforeseen events.<br />
Timetable<br />
Every cycle begins with evaluation and gathering information about the economic and<br />
social situation in Tbilisi. All these elements are repeated. Professional evaluation of the<br />
City situation not only helps to identify the key problems to be solved in the next edition of<br />
the Plan, but also defines the needs of the opinion-making groups. It is easier to choose<br />
the best ways of public intervention if the conclusions from the analysis (the survey,<br />
statistical data analysis) are correct.<br />
As it has been mentioned, the Corporate City Development Plans should be developed in<br />
yearly cycles. When deciding when the works should commence it is reasonable to take<br />
into consideration the City budget procedure and reporting dates. It is important to<br />
remember about the deadlines of applications to financial institutions and organisations<br />
supporting implementation projects.<br />
65
<strong>LOCAL</strong><br />
<strong>ECONOMIC</strong><br />
<strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong><br />
<strong>FOR</strong> <strong>TBILISI</strong><br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
DETAI<strong>LED</strong> ACTION <strong>PLAN</strong><br />
OF <strong>LED</strong> STRATEGY<br />
IMPLEMENTATION<br />
Tbilisi City Hall │ Economic Policy Agency<br />
Address: 2, Liberty Sq │ Tbilisi 0105, Georgia<br />
Tel.:(+99532)932314 │ Fax.:(+99532)932895<br />
E-Mail: economic@tbilisi.gov.ge<br />
www.tbilisi.gov.ge
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
1. Role of Tbilisi for national economy...................................................................................................... 4<br />
2. Changes of Tbilisi territorial structure in result of economy transition and strategy implementation 8<br />
3. Vision for Tbilisi Economic future ....................................................................................................... 13<br />
4. Strategic initiatives................................................................................................................................ 14<br />
5. Strategy implementation....................................................................................................................... 15<br />
5.1. Tbilisi booming regional gateway action plan ................................................................................... 15<br />
5.2. Time for business in Tbilisi action plan ............................................................................................. 19<br />
5.3. Tbilisi place to live action plan........................................................................................................... 25<br />
5.4. Tbilisi hospitable city action plan....................................................................................................... 28<br />
5.5. People empower Tbilisi action plan .................................................................................................. 31<br />
6. Strategy implementation principles .................................................................................................... 35<br />
2
TABLES<br />
Table 5-1 Tbilisi booming regional gateway – action plan ............................................................................................................................................16<br />
Table 5-2 Time for business in Tbilisi – action plan ......................................................................................................................................................20<br />
Table 5-3 Tbilisi place to live – action plan.....................................................................................................................................................................26<br />
Table 5-4 Tbilisi hospitable city – action plan..................................................................................................................................................................29<br />
Table 5-5 People empower Tbilisi – action plan............................................................................................................................................................32<br />
3
1. Role of Tbilisi for national economy<br />
City are the more and more powerful engines of the national and global economy. Two<br />
key forces - the globalization and the commercialization of new information as well as<br />
communications technologies - have been driving the massive changes and thus<br />
restructuring cities. Globalization is linked to liberalized trade and the opening up of world<br />
markets through organizations and agreements such as the Word Trade Organization or<br />
the European Union. Global corporations continue to expand their role on the world stage<br />
through expansion, mergers and acquisitions.<br />
Globalization would not be possible if there had not been for the explosion of new<br />
information technologies with mobile wireless communication, personal computers, and<br />
networks of internet, intranet and extranet. All of these have made it possible to manage<br />
facilities distributed around the world, for the labour to move more freely across national<br />
boundaries, and for the information, currencies and transactions to flow smoothly to any<br />
destination. As globalization proceeds, regional and national economies become more<br />
closely intertwined. National boundaries have gradually become less relevant as<br />
globalization and information technology have reduced the role of the nation state. Big<br />
metropolises with skilled workforce, globally connected businesses have emerged as the<br />
engines of the new economy.<br />
Globalization, and intensive competition which is integral to it, has led to a massive<br />
restructuring of regional economies. The widespread de-industrialization of cities,<br />
particularly of urban cores, is clear evidence of this. As the global marketplace expands,<br />
each city is forced to focus upon the few things that it is very good at, in which it can<br />
successfully compete at a global scale.<br />
This more recent phase of economic restructuring has been characterized by a<br />
transformation to a knowledge economy. The future quality of life in advanced economies<br />
depends on upgrading and moving the economy towards a concentration in high value<br />
added activities from any industry. The key is to focus on the high order, innovation<br />
based, high productivity activities in each industry. The quality of life and economic<br />
development, depend on making a successful transition to a knowledge economy.<br />
Unlike an economy based on traditional manufacturing and natural resource extraction, in<br />
which factors such as access to raw materials may have played a central role, the<br />
knowledge economy is driven by:<br />
• well educated and high-skilled workforce,<br />
• innovation – creativity, flexibility, research and development,<br />
• entrepreneurship – mentoring, networking, strategic alliances,<br />
• information and communications technology (ICT).<br />
4
On its way to becoming a regional center, Tbilisi’s relationships with the rest of the country<br />
should naturally be transformed. The role of cities as major actors on the world economy<br />
stage demands rethinking the whole approach to urban areas and their role in economic<br />
growth and improving quality of life. This rethinking is required not only within cities, but at<br />
the national level. City has not only the value of itself, but can mean even more in context<br />
of the whole region. The realities of a global economy dictate that all levels of government<br />
reevaluate their understanding of the role of cities, and their policies and approaches<br />
towards cities and towns. While each city is developing its own solutions, particular group<br />
of them should benefit from working together to develop and implement an integrated<br />
national, approach to advancing the economies of major urban centers.<br />
Funding and resources must now be directed toward supporting the transition to a<br />
knowledge economy, in the same way that the government supported the resource<br />
sector, and traditional manufacturing industries in the past. Central government<br />
representatives need to take into account the likely impacts of their policy and program<br />
decisions on urban economies. The emerging role of cities has been recognized round<br />
the world and is being exploited as a engines of national economic growth. A wide range<br />
of innovative initiatives and institutions are being put in place to more effectively respond<br />
to the changing context for cities.<br />
Good outcomes reflecting the satisfying condition of Tbilisi economy, when compared to<br />
the rest of the country, results from the fact that the city does not face any competition as<br />
far as economic indices are concerned. Other regions perform much worse than the City<br />
of Tbilisi.<br />
As a result of economy transformation Tbilisi lost its traditional industries that were<br />
generating incomes and workplaces for decades. Schools, universities and supporting<br />
institutions were organized around them. Now, when most of old factories do not operate<br />
any more all these institutions should transform their activities or will be closed down too.<br />
To create Tbilisi new economy profile and face competition of global markets new city<br />
products should be identified and new institutional infrastructure should be developed to<br />
support key city development possibilities. Cluster networks should grow around<br />
competitive city products that will be identified. Workforce development programs should<br />
be created to support young people entering labour market and those who need to<br />
change or improve their qualifications. Schools and vocational training institutions should<br />
develop new educational programs to prepare qualified workforce for the new sectors of<br />
economy. To build foundations for knowledge-based economy the research institutions<br />
should offer companies new management and production technologies. The whole range<br />
of institutions is needed to offer funding to growing companies (credit, capital and<br />
guarantees). Business networks, organizations, consulting and marketing companies will<br />
help companies and their products enter new markets and compete with foreign<br />
companies. Public institutions should participate in the process of supporting promotion<br />
campaigns, offering good quality space and qualified workforce for all new generation of<br />
firms and institution, in order to build international reputation and recognition of the city.<br />
5
It is of key importance for the city development to attract capital in the following areas. In<br />
order to improve the conditions of business activity and the quality of life it is most<br />
important to invest in technical infrastructure:<br />
• transport infrastructure,<br />
• telecommunication infrastructure,<br />
• utilities.<br />
In order to improve competitiveness of the economy the following investments in<br />
institutional infrastructure are necessary:<br />
• institutions facilitating access to funding,<br />
• institutions of labour market and workforce development,<br />
• institutions giving SME access to technical assistance,<br />
• networking and marketing organisations,<br />
• know- how and technology transfer institutions,<br />
• space for work with service provided.<br />
To set up new firms and attract investors business space is necessary for:<br />
• offices,<br />
• retail,<br />
• warehouses,<br />
• industrial units,<br />
• hotels and restaurants,<br />
• plots of land with infrastructure,<br />
• houses and apartments.<br />
The city can stimulate investment in these three areas in many ways. Some of these<br />
investments belong to the private sector, others will remain public investments. Part of the<br />
investments will be done by national investors, while another part of the capital will come<br />
from international markets.<br />
For the last twenty years we have been observing changes happening in the cities of<br />
Central and East Europe which have abandoned centrally planned economy and are<br />
joining global cooperation and competition. In the recent years in Georgia strategic<br />
investments in technical infrastructure have been done with both public and private<br />
money. Many international donors have started programmes building institutional<br />
infrastructure for the new economy. We can observe a boom on Tbilisi real estate market<br />
where, apart from housing estates, new office and shopping space has been built. New<br />
hotels, restaurants as well as factories and warehouses are being constructed as well.<br />
Some of the old industrial buildings in the inner city after renovation have been converted<br />
into moderate class offices and shops.<br />
Progressing economic reform and further political stabilisation will help Tbilisi go through<br />
the process of economic change, similar to the one experienced by the cities of East<br />
Europe. Since Georgia has joined the global economy and the skilled workforce<br />
resources in CEE have been running out, soon new investors will get interested in<br />
Caucasus and Tbilisi.<br />
Presently, Tbilisi sees processes typical for the second phase of economy transformation<br />
described above. In the following years we will still witness growing share of private<br />
6
investments in such areas as telecommunications, transport, logistics, trade, hotels and<br />
restaurants, offices, light industries and confection , media and entertainment.<br />
Due to these investments the city economy will gain capital, new organisational standards<br />
of production, management, staff skills as well as new jobs and the awareness of<br />
international markets.<br />
When creating long-lasting mechanisms of activities stimulating local economy it is a<br />
matter of fundamental value to find a partner institution who will initiate and coordinate<br />
development programmes.<br />
The local government needs partners not only among ordinary people, institutions and<br />
organisations in the City but should also find external partners such as banks, regional<br />
authorities and business organisations who can offer help in developing local job market.<br />
When implementing the economic development strategy for Tbilisi the following measures<br />
will be of key importance:<br />
• cooperation among the stakeholders,<br />
• establishing a municipal structure that is capable of generating and implementing<br />
local economic policy,<br />
• identification of priority projects being the foundation of local economic<br />
development,<br />
• starting cooperation with other cities that are undergoing the process of similar<br />
transformation by means of best practices,<br />
• encouraging local economic growth, which is such form of activity that requires<br />
specific skills and initiatives that are beyond the city hall’s traditional forms of<br />
activity.<br />
An important role in strategy implementation can be played by Economic Policy Agency.<br />
It is worth consideration that in the course of strategy implementation the Tbilisi City Hall<br />
department dealing with economic development could be transformed into an<br />
independent city agency provided with resources necessary to carry out strategy tasks.<br />
The Agency should:<br />
• employ a team of experts capable of project implementation,<br />
• develop a range of instruments to support companies and workforce,<br />
• have at their disposal the funds enabling them to realize tasks by means of their<br />
own earnings and subsidies for projects.<br />
A non-governmental organisation that is competent to perform such tasks, has adequate<br />
human technical and financial resources will secure sustained activity and will<br />
immediately react to changing conditions.<br />
When developing the Economic Development Strategy of Tbilisi City a workshop was<br />
held where the participants learned how to establish an NGO (foundation, association)<br />
and how to develop with local partners the local operation programme, methods and<br />
forms of raising funds for operation and project implementation.<br />
7
2. Changes of Tbilisi territorial structure in result of economy transition and<br />
strategy implementation<br />
The character, directions and pace of the city spatial development mostly depends<br />
on the impact of the political, economic and social factors. Such type of impact is<br />
considerably intensive during the dramatic changes in the public life, when evolutional,<br />
even character of the urban development is replaced by the “leap-like” change (alteration)<br />
and revolutionary or reformative effort finds its adequate reflection in the urban<br />
environment. World urbanism is familiar with huge number of such examples; and Tbilisi<br />
isn’t an exception. Moreover, because of its natural-landscape and historical-cultural<br />
feature, Tbilisi represents one of the best examples of such discrete development.<br />
Retrospective analysis of the spatial-planning development of the Georgian capital city<br />
affords to state the above mentioned, which is simplified by the sharply separated stages<br />
of the city history.<br />
(1) Feudal (Medieval) era is long-term period of thirteen centuries – from 502,<br />
when Tbilisi became a capital city until the turn of the 18 th and 19 th centuries when Eastern<br />
Georgia was attached to the Russian Empire. In this period the city was gradually<br />
developing on both banks of the river Mtkvari in the form of densely dwelled, compact<br />
residential area. Defense held a leading role in the city functions, which is shown by the<br />
city spatial arrangement reflected in the map of Tiflis (historical name of Tbilisi) drawn by<br />
Vakhushti Batonishvili in 1735. In this period Tiflis represented a city locked within the<br />
defensive walls, with small-scale settlement in the suburbs and gardens cultivated outside<br />
of the city. The center formed by the palaces, churches and caravansaries was located<br />
along the river Mtkvari; the resource of the city further spatial development was exhausted<br />
under the current conditions.<br />
(2) Period of the Russian Empire dominance (1801-1917) is characterized as the<br />
first dramatic “leap” of Tiflis spatial arrangement. City defensive functions are loosing their<br />
priority; a political task – creation of the leading political-administrative support for the<br />
domination of the Russian Empire in the Caucasus - is being highlighted. The city freely<br />
spreads up to the high terrace of the right bank of the river Mtkvari. Gardens of the King<br />
and Queen (nowadays Freedom Square and a part of Sololaki district) are also used as a<br />
resource of urban development. Planning of the new parts, on the contrary to the old<br />
feudal city, is regular and sometimes even without accounting the features of the relief.<br />
Many gorges running down from Mtatsminda are filled with soil; city engineering<br />
infrastructure and institutions’ system are formed, central functions and institutions are<br />
concentrated on the Golovin Prospect (now Shota Rustaveli Avenue). “Old Tbilisi”,<br />
practically is not included in the city planning innovations where, instead of ruined<br />
buildings, construction of basically new houses along the old streets is being held, which<br />
gives a name of “Double-face” to Tiflis in the middle of 19th century. In this period Tbilisi<br />
acquired such organic immanent feature as linear character of spatial arrangement, which<br />
mostly determines functional effectiveness of already accepted or ready for acceptation<br />
city planning solutions even till now.<br />
Incorporation into the city space the villages (Kukia, Chughureti) in the vicinity of<br />
Tiflis had a parallel character; for 1833 planning of the above mentioned territories was<br />
considered by means of regular network of the streets – as well as, the territory of outer<br />
Avlabari.<br />
In the 1860-70s Tiflis continued growing on the left bank of the river Mtkvari,<br />
which was supported by constructing the first in the TransCaucasia railway line – Poti-<br />
8
Tiflis in 1872. In 1883 this railway terminal turned into a draught, transit line – Poti-Tiflis-<br />
Baku. This railway line split the city space. It is significant that at first modern, often<br />
squatter-like urban growth was basically located on one side of the railway line, on the<br />
south-west side, but construction of the Nadzaladevi district generated a new problem –<br />
the need for city space integration, which has acquired an acute character for now.<br />
On a large scale, the fact that the city turned its back to the river Mtkvari – an axis<br />
of Tiflis economic and public life and its spatial arrangement - must be considered as an<br />
essential drawback of Tiflis spatial development.<br />
(3) A new third stage of growth and development of the Georgian capital begins<br />
after Georgia becoming a Soviet republic, but this period is not homogenous; it is divided<br />
into several stages.<br />
Under the conditions of rapid industrialization and urbanization of the country, for<br />
1930 was set an ideological-political and spatial-planning deadline of radical transition of<br />
Tiflis which was based on the doctrine of so-called “Socialistic Reconstruction”. The<br />
expression of that doctrine in Tiflis, as well as in other large cities of the Soviet Union, was<br />
“Tiflis Planning Project”.<br />
The project was developed in 1934. The planning project of Tiflis, the capital of<br />
TransCaucasian Federation at that time, did not set specific dates of implementation;<br />
initially, it was to be completed in 20-30 years. The city of 3 700 hectares became three<br />
times larger, expanding by 10.000 hectares and its population grew almost two times -<br />
from 420 thousand to 725 thousand. It is worth mentioning that two versions of spatial<br />
growth guidelines were developed.<br />
From the today’s point of view, it is very interesting that the project set the issue of<br />
assimilating so-called “Upper Tbilisi” – the directions of Tsavkisi, Shindisi, Tabakhmela,<br />
Kojori, Manglisi.<br />
The construction of Tbilisi-Koqsi railway had been already started in order to<br />
urbanize that zone, but its construction was soon abandoned. “Upper Tbilisi” was<br />
designed as a group of satellite settlements with their own industrial enterprises.<br />
The project was based on principle of functional zoning of the city space. Thus, a<br />
number of industries was concentrated in Didube, Ghrma-Ghele, Avchala and Navtlughi.<br />
The location of the railway line remained unchanged; and its thrift (economy) was<br />
basically developing in Didube.<br />
The center of the capital was considered at a traditional place – on the Square of<br />
TransCaucasian Federation (today the Freedom Square) and Rustaveli Avenue.<br />
New housing on the city territory was distributed in the following manner:<br />
- Old city (right embankment)…………………………………………………327 h;<br />
- Nadzaladevi…………………………………………………………………...430 h;<br />
- Central part on the left embankment……………………………………….380 h;<br />
- Isani and Avlabari…………………………………………………………….464 h;<br />
- Navtlughi……………………………………………………………………1.287 h;<br />
- Vake……………………………………………………………………………184 h;<br />
- Saburtalo……………………………………………………………………….610 h;<br />
- Dighomi………………………………………………………………………1.600 h.<br />
The project paid attention to regulating the river Mtkvari and its role in the creating<br />
spatial-architectural waterfront of the capital. Also, the arrangement of four dams – in<br />
Dighomi, Didube, Ortachala and Soghanlughi and in the river’s flooded cuts the launch of<br />
river transport was considered. The dams, besides their primary purposes (raising the<br />
level of water and producing electricity), would also serve as transport bridges. Besides,<br />
building of 6 bridges was planned, 3 in Dighomi, one in each Didube, Saburtalo and<br />
Avchala.<br />
9
In order to turn the city facade to the river Mtkvari the arrangement of<br />
embankments and, in some places, cutting into the river Mtkvari with green areas was<br />
also planned.As for the “Old Tbilisi”, the “Socialistic Reconstruction” practically meant its<br />
elimination.<br />
It must be mentioned that implementation of the plan of 1934 was stopped by the<br />
beginning of World War II; but some fragments of this plan were soon realized – forest<br />
planting on Tiflis trench slopes; limitation of the Mtkvari bed in the concrete dams and the<br />
arrangement of the embankments; cultivation of new gardens and parks; solution of such<br />
important city planning knot as the Heroes’ Square, the construction of the Circus Hill, the<br />
arrangement of Cheluskinelebi (today the Tamar the Queen street) bridge and street, etc.<br />
After the war, basically, the already begun and planned constructions were continued –<br />
the second row of Governmental House, building of Tea Thrift Trust (today the<br />
Intercontinental hotel), building of Coal Industrial Trust on Zemeli, etc.<br />
“Khrushchev thaw” acquired a powerful impulse to the spatial development of<br />
Tbilisi in the second half of the 1950s. As a result of housing construction introduced in the<br />
peripheral zones, communal flats were partly eliminated; housing stock structure met the<br />
needs of the demographic structure (“one flat – one family”). New housing policy required<br />
assimilation of new space; as a result of considering land as an non-economic category<br />
the extensive forms of city development were introduced, basically by acquiring rural<br />
areas.<br />
Such tendency became significantly stronger under the conditions of developing<br />
The Third General Plan of Tbilisi. “The General Plan of Tbilisi Reconstruction and<br />
Development” was passed in 1970 and it fully reflected the ideology of a Soviet city<br />
planning dominating at that time. In this case among the components of the ideology<br />
several are essential:<br />
o Considering Tbilisi as self-content, autonomous settlement;<br />
o Principle of locked labor balance;<br />
o Neglecting the agglomeration (metropolitan area) realities;<br />
o Territorial expansion;<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Extensiveness of planning;<br />
Hard vertical subordination of territorial units in the settlement system (cityouter<br />
district (suburbs) zone), etc.<br />
As a result, planners were forced to think within the frame of expanded<br />
administrative boarders of Tbilisi. On the contrary to the linear nature of the capital, a form<br />
of “ring-shaped roll” around Tbilisi Water Reservoir, of spatial development was proposed<br />
in the new general plan. Such kind of priority naturally caused generation of new,<br />
latitudinal directions in the development of Tbilisi city center.<br />
Tbilisi center continued its linear development; its basic axis was again up to the<br />
river Mtkvari; the linear center was formed in the following configuration: Freedom Square<br />
– Rustaveli Avenue – Merab Kostava Street in two directions – with branches to Vake and<br />
Saburtalo and tied by means of newly built road of Vake-Saburtalo. Parallel growth of the<br />
city center was observed by passing David the Builder Prospect into Didube, Akaki<br />
Tsereteli Prospect.<br />
Simultaneously to this leading tendency of Tbilisi center the second, specific<br />
direction – returning certain functions to “Old Tbilisi” – is being gradually developed<br />
basically, in the way of reconstruction and adaptation of historically formed urban<br />
environment. This trend was conceived in the 70ies of the 20th century, when for the first<br />
time in Tbilisi conditions the State Defense Zone of the Old City (1975), was introduced<br />
which was developed later and acquired three part structure – State (strict) Defense Zone,<br />
Development Regulating Zone and Natural Landscape Protection Zone (1985).<br />
10
Nowadays this second direction of the city center development plays a more and<br />
more important role. It is apparent how important it is to make a preliminary urban<br />
decision in the development of city environment: it is enough to say that such city forming<br />
“injections”, as the Saint Trinity Cathedral and the construction of the Presidential<br />
Apartments have radically (dramatically) changed the position of Avlabari district on the<br />
prestige scale and, consequently, the real estate prices. We should remember that the<br />
similar activities in the 1980s (the construction of “Metekhi-Palace”) did not bring a<br />
desired effect – the business and its environment were not ready for that at the time.<br />
Under the conditions of dramatic increase of traffic and the city population mobility<br />
a large-scale problem of providing latitudinal functional-spatial connections appeared. The<br />
point is that a basic factor hindering functional-planning development of historically formed<br />
part was its “strap-shaped” character which is determined by the existence of two,<br />
principally different, separating barriers – the river Mtkvari and the railway line.<br />
The general plan suggested the solution to lessen this problem – to move the<br />
viaduct linking Didube-Nadzaladevi on the axis of Vakhushti Bridge over the railway line.<br />
That proposal of the general plan was not realized in the Soviet period. Today, under the<br />
entirely new socio-economic conditions such “strap-shaped” character of the planning<br />
structure of the capital city of independent country not only makes it difficult to integrate<br />
various parts of the city by means of transversal links, but also makes “isolated” parts stay<br />
under undesirable conditions. This inequality is reflected even in such a summary<br />
economic indicator as different prices of real estate on both sides of the railway line. In the<br />
case of the river Mtkvari, if its role as a separating barrier is a natural, even organic factor<br />
for Tbilisi, the railway line belongs to the anthropogenic category, its course reflects the<br />
vision of the last quarter of the 19th century and is morally obsolete in terms of macro<br />
structure of modern urban territory. Such estimation within the city would only become<br />
more acute in connection with the development of the Tbilisi railway knot – considering<br />
construction of Tbilisi-Akhalkalaki-Karsi line, and simultaneously to the regulating of the<br />
geopolitical situation, opening the blocked railway direction, not to mention the idea of<br />
possible reanimation of the Trans-Caucasian railway.<br />
In these terms, the dismantling of the transit course of the railway line in the heart<br />
of Tbilisi and rational use of these newly acquired areas may become that powerful<br />
constructing impulse which Tbilisi has been waiting for a long time and which will bring<br />
new quality to its spatial-planning structure.<br />
Firstly, the expected empty area of railway economy, basically, in the Didube<br />
district with its space and technical infrastructure (including a subway line) will create the<br />
city planning preconditions for the development of a large business center (Central<br />
Business District - CBD) which Tbilisi has been lacking so far. Now, because there is no<br />
such a district in Tbilisi, business functions are performed in buildings offering high-quality<br />
office space but dispersed all over the city.<br />
Besides, the establishment of the CBD will have great impact on the surrounding<br />
area – its integration, the prices of land will rise and the land use character will change. It<br />
is most important for the revitalization of waterfront along the river Mtkvari which is one of<br />
the problematic and derelict zones for now in terms of spatial arrangement.<br />
What is more important is an indirect impact of CBD on the conditions of inward<br />
development of Tbilisi historical center, because, according to the principle of “shared<br />
vessel”, difficult to control developers’ intervention in the urban tissue of the “Old Tbilisi” in<br />
the zones of conservation of the cultural heritage will be moved to the CBD. As a result, it<br />
will enable the city authorities to conduct the reconstruction-conservation works in the “Old<br />
Tbilisi” in such manner that it will ensure its proper functioning and will meet the ICOMOS<br />
preconditions to include Tbilisi in the UNESCO list of world heritage sites.<br />
11
Thus, the creation of the new CBD will strengthen the positive trends of functional<br />
specialization in the territorial structure of Tbilisi entire city center: the representative<br />
center – Rustaveli Avenue, the tourist center – “Old Tbilisi”, the medical center – Dighomi,<br />
the recreational centers – Mtatsminda and Tbilisi Sea, etc.<br />
The concept also involves the development of technological park and logistic zone<br />
in the eastern part of the city, in the vicinity of the Airport and in the direction of Rustavi,<br />
where “new generation” industrial and logistic objects will be moved.<br />
Apparently, the restructuring of the entire city center must be based on the<br />
convenient scheme of infrastructure development, the implementation of which will be<br />
possible within a higher taxonomic unit – the metropolitan area, due to the establishment<br />
and implementation of the spatial arrangement defined in the Georgian Law on the “Basis<br />
of Spatial Arrangement and Urban Planning” (2005). Thus, the transportation<br />
infrastructure is crucial – first of all linking the outer city with the inner one by means of a<br />
highway constructed within the metropolitan area (supplemented by a railway roundabout,<br />
the extension of the railway line from Airport to Rustavi, etc.).<br />
The significant changes could be recently observed in the sector of housing, which<br />
is likely to become a clear trend. The early housing projects had an individual character<br />
and were persistently spreading towards prestigious districts (Vake, Vera). Nowadays<br />
housing estates (one family houses, town-houses) are more and more popular and there<br />
is a tendency to build facilities for services (security, sports, recreation) around the<br />
estates, including the attempts to create gated communities. As for the location of the new<br />
housing, developers are more daringly assimilating the districts that were earlier neglected<br />
– Didube, Ortachala, not to mention Avlabari district which is rapidly rising on the city<br />
scale of prestige and prices. First signs of suburbanization process should also be paid<br />
attention to, for example contemporary Didgori district territory has been incorporated in<br />
the administrative borders of Tbilisi.<br />
Tbilisi spatial order has significantly changed its structure after assimilating<br />
territories of Didgori district, yet this change has only a quantitative character. What will<br />
Didgori district add to Tbilisi in terms of quality, it will entirely depend on the urban<br />
development policy and documents developed on its basis, primarily, on the “Tbilisi Land<br />
Use General (Operative) Plan”.<br />
So far, almost fully privatized housing resources, the tendency of mass formation<br />
and the activation of Home Owners’ Associations have become a positive trend, which is<br />
mainly determined by the program that has been successfully implemented by the<br />
Citizenship and Integration Agency (Tbilisi Corps.).<br />
Thus, according to the above presented analyses may be made the conclusions<br />
that major aim of the contemporary urban development of Tbilisi is to highlight, develop<br />
and implement such partial and general and “leap-like” city constructing axis idea which<br />
under the conditions of strong economic competitiveness among the world and regional<br />
cities, directly or indirectly will ensure the role of this capital of the independent state as a<br />
metropolitan area as well as the center of South Caucasus. Such a vision sets<br />
significantly new and unprecedented requirements to Tbilisi functional and spatial<br />
arrangement, mainly in terms of structural and architectural solution of the city center<br />
system.<br />
Careful examination of submitted proposals must be realized within the frame of<br />
the “Tbilisi Land Use General (Operative) Plan”, with the participation of all the<br />
stakeholders and taking into consideration the principle of transparency.<br />
12
3. Vision for Tbilisi Economic future<br />
<strong>TBILISI</strong> economic development strategy<br />
right place, right time<br />
desired<br />
impact<br />
• Competitive companies<br />
• Prosperity of residents<br />
• Growing City revenues<br />
vision:<br />
strategic<br />
directions<br />
offers wide range of services and opportunities<br />
to citizens, companies, institutions and visitors<br />
who are living, working, learning and relaxing<br />
in the city and entire region<br />
• Tbilisi booming regional gateway<br />
• Time for business in Tbilisi<br />
• Tbilisi place to live<br />
• Tbilisi hospitable city<br />
• People empower Tbilisi<br />
13
4. Strategic initiatives<br />
Tbilisi economic strategy identify five strategic directions that will be the basis of strategic<br />
initiatives.<br />
Action in these areas will make Tbilisi a regional financial and service center creating<br />
comfortable environment for endogenous grow, attracting city to new investors, visitors<br />
and residents.<br />
<strong>TBILISI</strong> economic development strategy<br />
right place, right time<br />
DIRECTIONS<br />
1. Tbilisi booming regional gateway<br />
Access point to the region, regional meeting place , service center for the region<br />
2. Time for business in Tbilisi<br />
We support to start and grow your business, we create a space for your business, we<br />
offer financing to develop your company, we attract Tbilisi to investors<br />
3. Tbilisi place to live<br />
We create our homes according to ambitions of our families, we develop livable<br />
neighborhoods, we create strong communities, we build the city we will be proud of<br />
4. Tbilisi hospitable city<br />
Come and see what Tbilisi is, stay and experience what Tbilisi can offer you<br />
5. People empower Tbilisi<br />
Prepare yourself to participation in labour market, improve your skills, jobs for all<br />
14
5. Strategy implementation<br />
5.1. Tbilisi booming regional gateway action plan<br />
Directing the new potential of Tbilisi towards this aim will first of all lead to stimulating the<br />
growth of the city as an internationally recognized metropolitan center. It can be achieved<br />
by means of the effective use and development of its existing business research, cultural,<br />
sports and tourist potentials as well as by strengthening its role as one of the regional<br />
service centers.<br />
Tbilisi, being a metropolitan area, boasts:<br />
numerous research organizations, business environment institutions (banks, trade fair<br />
agencies, chambers of industry and commerce, the market of real property services,<br />
business associations),<br />
a significant potential in science and education,<br />
important cultural organizations and institutions (a theater, a concert hall, a museum,<br />
art galleries, artistic societies),<br />
good sports and tourist facilities,<br />
a convenient geographical location – at the crossroads of motor, rail and air routes.<br />
The problems underlying the choice of the program are:<br />
not sufficient connection within the metropolitan area and entire region<br />
broadened administrative city limits and insufficiently developed metropolitan<br />
functions,<br />
missing fast road and rail network,<br />
insufficient transport links connecting the region and the country with the outside<br />
world.<br />
If Tbilisi develops in this direction, it will become a metropolitan area of regional, national<br />
and international importance as well as it will boost its competitiveness.<br />
The results will be:<br />
better inwards and outwards accessibility due to the establishment of transportation<br />
system integrated with the airport,<br />
strengthened potential of the metropolitan area due to the complementary growth of<br />
the main centers, especially in the field of research, culture and sport,<br />
best location for financial center of the region,<br />
regional meeting places where international events can be organized.<br />
15
Table 5-1 Tbilisi booming regional gateway – action plan<br />
PROGRAM<br />
Access point to the region<br />
PROGRAM<br />
Regional meeting place<br />
Project name Problems and project description Measures Partners<br />
Tbilisi on your way People going to different parts of Caucasus region can travel through and<br />
stay for a while in Tbilisi.<br />
Travel agencies,<br />
Logistic centre<br />
Caucasus house -<br />
Tbilisi conference<br />
center<br />
Calendar of regional<br />
events<br />
Conference<br />
organizer guide<br />
Develop Caucasus travelers’ guide providing travelers with info about<br />
plane, train and bus connections, driving conditions, accommodation,<br />
travel agents and other needed data. Guide will be prepared in Georgian,<br />
English, Russian language.<br />
Development and renovation of Tbilisi Airport, new railway and road<br />
connections can attract Tbilisi to cargo service companies<br />
Make Tbilisi attractive as a regional logistic and distribution center to<br />
investors and shipping agencies serving Caucasus.<br />
-Companies delivering cargo to Caucasus region learn about logistic<br />
services available in Tbilisi.<br />
Comprehensive Conference Center will be the place where the most<br />
important regional meetings can be organized.<br />
Identifying potential Center locations can be involved in project<br />
development and preparation of feasibility study for the center.<br />
Visitors planning trip to Tbilisi needs to know when international events<br />
are planned.<br />
Collect and present a list of regional conferences, festivals, trainings take<br />
place in the coming year, updated on annual basis.<br />
Conference business is rapidly growing in the region. To attract Tbilisi to<br />
potential conference organizers all necessary info should be easy<br />
achievable.<br />
Prepare Conference Organizers Guide presenting Tbilisi’s possibilities<br />
and conditions for conference organizers.<br />
The guide will be<br />
available in printable<br />
version at city portal.<br />
Warehousing and<br />
logistic Tbilisi profile<br />
available on the city<br />
website.<br />
Project<br />
accomplished.<br />
The calendar will be<br />
included into<br />
different packages.<br />
The guide will be<br />
available.<br />
hotels, car rent<br />
agents, restaurant<br />
network<br />
Shipping agencies<br />
-Developers<br />
-City and regional<br />
entrepreneurs<br />
-Education<br />
institutions<br />
International<br />
organizations,<br />
public institutions,<br />
business<br />
organizations<br />
Hotels,<br />
conference<br />
facilities owners,<br />
service providers
PROGRAM<br />
You can serves the region from<br />
Tbilisi<br />
Network of Caucasus<br />
cities<br />
Caucasus media and<br />
info centers guide<br />
Tbilisi<br />
bureau<br />
convention<br />
Doing business in<br />
Caucasus<br />
Caucasus specialists<br />
data base<br />
Cities in Caucasus face similar challenges because of economic<br />
transformation.<br />
Continue cooperation with other cities in the region and partners from<br />
Central and Western Europe to exchange experience on economic<br />
transition. Organize exchange platform for best practices in the area of<br />
local economic programs.<br />
People staying working in Tbilisi needs easy access to different king of<br />
information about current situation in the region.<br />
Develop internet page with links to key regional resources providing<br />
service in English.<br />
Tbilisi should facilitate the coordination and communication between<br />
potential customers and suppliers of various services for business<br />
tourism. The. City will unite the representatives from the local tourist<br />
industry to develop common marketing and promotional activities.<br />
Establish Tbilisi Convention Bureau to promote Tbilisi as a place for<br />
organizing meetings, trade fairs, exhibitions and incentive trips. The aim<br />
will be to establish a body which will coordinate these activities and help<br />
to develop common business tourism products.<br />
To attract Tbilisi to global investors we should provide info about<br />
conditions for doing business not only in Georgia but also in other parts of<br />
the region.<br />
Provide international and Georgian businesses located in Tbilisi with<br />
information about legal businesses condition for doing business in<br />
Armenia, Azerbaijan and other countries in the region.<br />
International and Georgian companies serving different Caucasus<br />
markets will need access to skilled professionals that could serve in entire<br />
region or specific country.<br />
Develop internet data base for professionals and employers seeking each<br />
other.<br />
Minimum one event<br />
will be organized per<br />
year.<br />
Media links will be<br />
available at key<br />
Tbilisi’s portals.<br />
Tbilisi Convention<br />
Bureau established.<br />
Guide will be<br />
available at city<br />
website updated on<br />
annual basis.<br />
Cities from region,<br />
European<br />
partners, GTZ<br />
Media agencies<br />
- Tourists<br />
association<br />
- Conference<br />
facility owners<br />
- Conference<br />
facility service<br />
providers’<br />
- Hotels<br />
- Fairs<br />
-Chamber<br />
commerce<br />
business<br />
organizations,<br />
-Embassies.<br />
Ongoing activity. Chamber of<br />
commerce<br />
of<br />
17
We serve Caucasus –<br />
Caucasus Yellow<br />
Pages<br />
Financial and office<br />
centre of the region<br />
International and Georgian companies located in Tbilisi and entering other<br />
markets will need business partner providing quality services.<br />
Develop internet data base for professionals and employers seeking each<br />
other.<br />
Tbilisi is the best location for financial and service center that can serve all<br />
other parts of the region.<br />
Identifying potential location that can provide enough space for Tbilisi<br />
Business District (TBD). Develop concept and promote it to potential<br />
investors. Development of Tbilisi real estate market profile. Organization<br />
of Real estate promotion campaign.<br />
Internet data base<br />
provide info on<br />
ongoing basis.<br />
Promotion campaign<br />
prepared. Tbilisi real<br />
market profile,<br />
International<br />
conference for<br />
developers and<br />
investors.<br />
-Business<br />
organizations,<br />
-Info providers<br />
-Developers, -<br />
Governmental<br />
institutions,<br />
-International<br />
advisers.<br />
18
5.2. Time for business in Tbilisi action plan<br />
Time for business means first of all the creation of good conditions for the development of<br />
modern economy of a regional character.<br />
The growth of Tbilisi depends on the competitiveness of local companies and on the<br />
number of new jobs. Unfortunately the city business environment is not functioning well<br />
enough. The proposed development tendency results from the need to remove the<br />
barriers that local companies, both the existing ones and the set-ups, have to face. These<br />
barriers primarily include the lack of adequate infrastructure and very poor technology<br />
transfer from research centers. The aim is to provide the initial development impulse,<br />
trigger the process of starting new companies and to create the image of the city as an<br />
attractive place for doing business.<br />
The proposed solution results mainly from problems related to the local economy such<br />
as:<br />
insufficiently developed network of business environment institutions and the lack of<br />
coordinated activities as well as the unconsolidated business community,<br />
no coherent system of information about services, support programs and investment<br />
opportunities,<br />
poor competitiveness of companies, the lack of innovation improvement system and<br />
the system of new technology inflow,<br />
poor access to starting capital,<br />
lack of leading sector that would be a driving power for the city economy.<br />
The undertaken initiatives will meet the needs of Tbilisi companies to maintain their<br />
position on the market and increase their competitiveness, create favorable conditions<br />
for stimulating business activity of local citizens as well as encourage business<br />
organizations to build a strong regional business center. The above will lead to the<br />
following results:<br />
the increased number of companies,<br />
introduction and the use of new technologies in production and management,<br />
more jobs in the SME sector.<br />
The main planned initiatives are:<br />
the establishment and development of institutions specializing in promoting<br />
entrepreneurship and innovation,<br />
building the infrastructure for business growth,<br />
encouraging new jobs creation,<br />
establishing institutions that support entrepreneurship,<br />
offering space for business with assistance.
Table 5-2 Time for business in Tbilisi – action plan<br />
PROGRAM<br />
We support your business<br />
Project name Problems and project description Measures Partners<br />
Small and medium businesses are key players for development of Ongoing activity.<br />
diversified city economy.<br />
We help you to start and<br />
grow your business<br />
We ask you about your<br />
problems and analyze<br />
issues you face -<br />
Business attitude<br />
surveys and analyses<br />
We offer you information<br />
you need - Reports and<br />
business profiles<br />
We support development<br />
of promising clusters -<br />
Clusters development<br />
Provide young people with advice and information about business<br />
establishment procedures, development of business plans or financing.<br />
- establish one stop shop for user friendly advice for small companies<br />
- thru business partner organizations provide advice to local companies at<br />
every stage of the business life cycle.<br />
Independent from the aggregation of secondary statistic data on the<br />
condition of the local economy it is necessary to find out the opinions of<br />
people directly involved in business activity in that area, i.e. those who<br />
make investment decisions and create new jobs.<br />
Conduct Business Attitude Surveys:<br />
- to grasp the attitudes of business environment towards local authorities<br />
and local economic policy,<br />
- to learn about the employers’ plans concerning their development projects<br />
and possible change of address,<br />
- to make business groups and local governments understand each other<br />
better.<br />
Different market research analyses can help companies and develop own<br />
market strategies<br />
Conduct analyses of city and regional growing markets. Discuss with<br />
business community possibilities of join activities supporting expansion of<br />
Tbilisi based companies.<br />
Develop and strengthen the competitiveness of companies operating within<br />
the structures of identified clusters that, directly or indirectly, influence the<br />
economic and social growth of Tbilisi.<br />
Supporting the clusters will be performed through various institutions from<br />
business environment whose tasks will include supporting<br />
Business Attitude<br />
Surveys<br />
conducted<br />
annually.<br />
Analyses<br />
conducted and<br />
conferences<br />
organized on<br />
annual basis.<br />
Institutionalization<br />
of key clusters<br />
around<br />
competitive city<br />
products.<br />
- Business<br />
organizations<br />
- International<br />
organizations<br />
- Business<br />
organizations<br />
- International<br />
organizations<br />
- Business<br />
organizations<br />
- International<br />
organizations<br />
- Local<br />
entrepreneurs<br />
- Universities<br />
- Business<br />
environment<br />
institutions
We build digital platform<br />
for our businesses<br />
We talk directly with<br />
business community -<br />
Business round tables<br />
entrepreneurship, facilitating starting a new business (start-ups, spin-offs)<br />
and assisting them (entrepreneurship incubators, technology incubators).<br />
Business environment institutions, with the coordinative support of the City,<br />
will be responsible for:<br />
- creating favourable conditions for new technology transfer,<br />
- improving the quality of human resources in companies through training<br />
and consultation,<br />
- supporting cooperation links among companies,<br />
- building a cooperation network and animating innovation<br />
Information Community Technologies and telecommunication<br />
infrastructures are more and more important for future competitiveness of<br />
local companies in global economy.<br />
Develop digital platform – economic internet portal for Tbilisi based<br />
companies with needed info and e-businesses possibilities as a part of<br />
public infrastructure.<br />
Information exchange platform is the best way to identify joint projects<br />
between Tbilisi municipality and local business.<br />
The main task of the project is to: broaden and diversify the economic base<br />
in Tbilisi; organise regular meetings with Tbilisi’s entrepreneurs,<br />
municipality and Chamber of Trade and Industry and discuss actual topics<br />
for city development and recognize business community situation and<br />
needs, establish forum for direct cooperation between public and private<br />
partners. Expected results: regular information exchange between local<br />
business and municipality, Common projects could be developed,<br />
development of business environment in Tbilisi and trust between business<br />
and municipality<br />
Digital platform<br />
established.<br />
Quarterly round<br />
table discussions.<br />
- Business<br />
association and<br />
Private Sector<br />
Partnership<br />
- International<br />
organizations<br />
- Governmental<br />
institutions<br />
- Key city<br />
businesses,<br />
- Business<br />
organizations<br />
21
PROGRAM<br />
Space for Your business<br />
You can find a place to<br />
start business – Incubator<br />
Space for your growing<br />
service company - Office<br />
units<br />
Space for your industrial<br />
firm - Industrial units<br />
Home of new<br />
technologies - Technology<br />
park<br />
Businesses that operate in the incubator can take advantage of common<br />
administration, secretary office or information sources. Incubators will serve<br />
entrepreneurs that need space to start<br />
The incubator may serve as a tool of promoting certain types of business<br />
activity or stimulating its weaker areas. As a result, they can save a lot of<br />
money on starting investment costs and use it for equipment and working<br />
capital instead. In an optimal version this project can be combined with a<br />
business consultation centre and/or with project financing. From a financial<br />
point of view several methods can be applied: the rent paid by the<br />
incubator tenants can be refunded for a fixed period of time, or it can be<br />
calculated as a turnover percentage. In both cases the tenants should pay<br />
for communal services and share the administration costs. After 12 months<br />
of exemption from rent the rent should gradually grow until it reaches<br />
commercial levels after 2-3 years, which will enable the incubator to survive<br />
Young and dynamically growing companies need more office space but<br />
they don not have capital or credibility to buy or rent a commercial estate.<br />
Provide through partnerships with developers and non commercial<br />
organizations office space to growing companies within specific sectors.<br />
Tbilisi needs more space for dynamically growing industrial companies<br />
The objective of establishing Tbilisi Industrial Park (TIP) is to create an<br />
attractive space for business and investments that boasts of efficient<br />
infrastructure, low costs of facilities and of professional support services.<br />
Competitive local economy has to create corridors for transfer of new<br />
technologies.<br />
Through partnership with other governmental institutions and universities<br />
provide space and assistance to active in the area of knowledge based<br />
economies. Promote Tbilisi to global corporations as locations of research<br />
and development institutes.<br />
Business<br />
feasibility study<br />
prepared.<br />
Feasibility study<br />
prepared<br />
Joint projects<br />
identified.<br />
New projects<br />
identified and<br />
ready for<br />
realisation.<br />
Agreement on<br />
city participation<br />
in Tbilisi<br />
Technology Park<br />
development.<br />
Business<br />
-association<br />
- International<br />
organizations<br />
- Developers,<br />
- International<br />
organizations<br />
- Developers,<br />
- Governmental<br />
institutions,<br />
- International<br />
organizations,<br />
- Neighbour local<br />
governments<br />
- Universities<br />
- Governmental<br />
Institutions<br />
- International<br />
organizations<br />
22
If you want to buy land to<br />
build your own real estate<br />
Grants and micro credits<br />
for start ups<br />
Strong mature companies would prefer to invest in their own real estate.<br />
Improve the information and advice on investment possibilities. Develop<br />
strong partnership with a professional partner. Tbilisi real estate market<br />
profile. Promote Tbilisi to real estate and industrial investors.<br />
Providing easy access to cheap credits is an important element of business<br />
activity stimulation. Local micro credits fund is an independent organisation<br />
cooperating with the City structures.<br />
Tbilisi real estate<br />
market profile<br />
available at city<br />
portal annually<br />
updated.<br />
Info on current<br />
investment offers<br />
available at city<br />
portal.<br />
Micro – credits<br />
provided to local<br />
companies.<br />
- Developers,<br />
- Landlords,<br />
- Governmental<br />
institutions.<br />
- Banks,<br />
- International<br />
organizations<br />
PROGRAM<br />
Money to start and grow Your business<br />
Credit guaranties<br />
The project objective is to support the SME sector in their access to<br />
external financing, which should contribute to increasing their<br />
competitiveness, investment potential and employment. The benefits of<br />
establishing a loan fund are similar to the ones brought by a guarantee<br />
fund – better availability of capital for start-ups and relatively good loan<br />
terms. Good terms mean subsidised interest rates or replacing property<br />
securities with a form of audit performed by the fund. The procedures in<br />
commercial banks are very demanding. Few small entrepreneurs can meet<br />
their requirements. The principal aim of this project is to establish an<br />
organisation that, through financing small and medium businesses, would<br />
create solid basis for starting up and expanding business activity.<br />
The problem that companies complain about most often is the lack of<br />
capital.. A small starting-up firm has to find its own unique unconventional<br />
ideas, which is often connected with difficulties in finding capital.<br />
A guarantee fund is a way to overcome one of the most important barriers<br />
that prevents small and medium businesses from accessing funding<br />
resources, i.e. the lack of appropriate financial guarantee. Commercial<br />
banks do not find small firms with little capital attractive. The guarantee<br />
fund is an attempt to reduce the distance between the interests of banks<br />
(by lessening the risk and preliminary auditing of the client) and small<br />
businesses (by securing the bank credit). Results: increased business<br />
with/for the private sector, increased transparency of the local government,<br />
possible savings in the local budget, tighter quality control of products /<br />
Guaranties<br />
offered to local<br />
companies.<br />
- Banks,<br />
- International<br />
organizations.<br />
23
services<br />
PROGRAM<br />
Attracting Tbilisi to investors<br />
Conferences and fairs<br />
Targeted<br />
campaigns<br />
promotion<br />
Investors, you are our<br />
gests – one stop shop<br />
Conferences and fairs create the best opportunity to invite potential<br />
business partners and promote own products.<br />
Through partnership with government institutions, international<br />
organizations and business organizations city will support organization of<br />
conferences, business missions and presentations promoting Tbilisi to<br />
global investors.<br />
Direct promotion campaigns at targeted markets will attract specified and<br />
demanded investors to Tbilisi<br />
Identifying potential barriers for specific investors. Work with other partners<br />
to address these barriers. Provide targeted investors with info and advice<br />
on investments opportunities, available workforce.<br />
Easy access to office that will offer professional advice in management,<br />
finance, marketing and human resources to current Small and Medium<br />
Enterprises.<br />
Interested companies will be able to acquire information and receive<br />
assistance in complying with the administrative procedures related to<br />
establishment and running of their businesses. These services include:<br />
assistance to the managers in planning of their business, organization of<br />
courses, seminars, support of the business community through<br />
communication with the local administration, advocacy etc. The office will<br />
gradually become sustainable. The initial office costs will be covered by<br />
the municipal budget or donor funds. The establishment of this office will<br />
become a factor in improving the overall business environment.<br />
Participation in<br />
different business<br />
events.<br />
Certain<br />
companies<br />
agreed<br />
partners<br />
implemented.<br />
with<br />
and<br />
Agreement on<br />
city participation<br />
in one stop shop<br />
development.<br />
-Governmental<br />
institutions,<br />
-Business<br />
organizations<br />
-Business<br />
organizations<br />
- Embassies<br />
-Governmental<br />
institutions<br />
- Government,<br />
International<br />
organizations,<br />
- European Union<br />
programs in regional<br />
private enterprise<br />
center,<br />
24
5.3. Tbilisi place to live action plan<br />
The main objectives set to follow the chosen strategic city development direction are as<br />
follows: to create conditions for a comprehensive development for Tbilisi residents, to<br />
encourage their identification with the city as well as to create a modern and functional<br />
urban space.<br />
The quality of local residents’ life depends on their dwelling conditions, natural<br />
environment and the accessibility of modern communal infrastructure. The existing<br />
housing resources do not provide every family with a separate apartment. However, the<br />
actual deficit may turn out to be larger because many apartment blocks have to be pulled<br />
down due to their technical state or land development works (new roads and others).<br />
Also, a tendency has been observed for the families to shrink in size. The city is facing<br />
the problem of recapitalization of housing and infrastructural resources. It also has a large<br />
share of poor quality urban space. These are mainly worn out buildings with insufficient<br />
facilities. Some of them are in danger of collapsing and need to be immediately pulled<br />
down. In order to lessen the housing deficit and improve local dwelling conditions it is<br />
necessary to build new houses and to modernize most of the existing ones, taking into<br />
consideration the need to upgrade the urban space and technical standards. What is<br />
more, some of the residents have limited access to water supply and disposal facilities. It<br />
seems absolutely necessary to invest in this sector in order to make the city function<br />
smoothly and enhance the local quality of life.<br />
The problems underlying the choice of the program are:<br />
a growing number of families whose situation, mainly the material one, prevents them<br />
from maintaining their own apartment, which results in an increased demand for social<br />
housing,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
insufficient supply of housing for moderate income families and young people,<br />
arrears in renovating the city material property (housing and infrastructural resources),<br />
which has led to worsening local everyday living conditions as well as has triggered<br />
some undesirable social phenomena,<br />
the need to revitalize and transform much of the urban functional space,<br />
insufficient technical infrastructure in the developed areas and in the areas to be<br />
developed in future, which is hindering new constructions,<br />
poor offer of attractive construction lots directed to high income residents,<br />
downgraded natural environment resources.<br />
The primary objective is to improve the quality of life in Tbilisi and to increase the<br />
attractiveness of dwellings. Once this objective has been realized, the housing deficit will<br />
decrease, its quality will improve, the number of migrants will be reduced and the local<br />
economy will grow. The proposed activities are oriented at investors (the individual ones,<br />
developers, housing cooperatives, real estate and city managers, the communal<br />
infrastructure managers) and at all those who would like to settle down in Tbilisi
Table 5-3 Tbilisi place to live – action plan<br />
Project name Problems and project description Measures Partners<br />
City visiting card The lack of investments in technical and housing infrastructure resulted in Improvements in Gangebeli, local<br />
the desolation of Tbilisi residents’ meeting places.<br />
districts. towaristestwo<br />
PROGRAM<br />
Our City<br />
PROGRAM<br />
Our home<br />
We care for the<br />
quality of our life<br />
We build our city<br />
Improving your home<br />
The City Visiting Card project involves district leaders and city residents in<br />
restoring the past image of the places they live in and in the development<br />
and revitalization of the public space that has been a traditional meeting<br />
place. The project covers the following streets: Rustaweli, Freedom<br />
Square and Gudiashvil Square<br />
The quality of life is a monitoring mechanism for the changes that are<br />
happening in the city.<br />
The survey investigates not only the opinions about the quality and<br />
availability of technical infrastructure but also about public services offered<br />
by the local government. The survey deals with such areas of the residents’<br />
life as public transport, health, safety, natural environment, leisure time,<br />
workforce market or education.<br />
Citizens wants to have direct impact on decisions improving public spaces.<br />
On the basis on annual quality of life survey and internet forum citizens will<br />
recommend the most desirable improvements of City squares, streets,<br />
fountains or recreation areas and facilities.<br />
Many communal houses has poor technical infrastructure. Local<br />
government has limited financial possibilities.<br />
Work with residents and towaristestwo in the districts. The City of Tbilisi<br />
participates in co-financing hard infrastructure renovation and improvement<br />
of : roofs, water pipes, elevators, doors, sewerage systems.<br />
Completed<br />
survey.<br />
Recommendation<br />
to the Mayor<br />
three<br />
improvements<br />
chosen on basis<br />
of the survey.<br />
Number of<br />
improvements.<br />
Research<br />
institute,<br />
University,<br />
public services<br />
representatives.<br />
Research<br />
institute,<br />
University<br />
Gangebeli, local<br />
towaristestwo
PROGRAM<br />
Our<br />
neighborhoo<br />
d (ezo)<br />
Great place to live<br />
Devastation and lack of public space for residents.<br />
In cooperation with residents City of Tbilisi is participating in Coo financing<br />
for technical infrastructure, recreational infrastructure and creating public<br />
meeting place and cultural facilities locally in the districts.<br />
Increased<br />
participation<br />
residents in work<br />
on creation of<br />
public spaces.<br />
Local leaders –<br />
gangebeli, local<br />
towaristestwo,<br />
residents<br />
PROGRAM<br />
Our community (ubani)<br />
Better services for<br />
residents<br />
We are living<br />
together<br />
Places for trade and services in the districts are poorly defined, scattered<br />
and devoid of modern sanitary facilities, which impairs their competitiveness<br />
and availability to the city residents.<br />
The project activities first of all include putting trade and service tractsin the<br />
districts in proper order. The area covered by the pilot project includes the<br />
block of Kalaubnia and Zulukidze streets (Sam Gori) as well as<br />
Mosulishvili, Khizanishvili, Omisgmerebie (Gdani).<br />
The degeneration of public life in large housing estates and the lack of<br />
integrating events has led to a situation where city residents do not form<br />
interpersonal bonds and their identification with their place of residence is<br />
poor.<br />
The project activities include co-financing grants designed to support<br />
organization of such cultural events that aim at integrating local<br />
communities and promote participation in community life.<br />
Districts<br />
identified.<br />
Social events in<br />
districts.<br />
Local leaders –<br />
gangebeli, local<br />
towaristestwo,<br />
small business<br />
representatives<br />
Local leaders –<br />
gangebeli, local<br />
towaristestwo,<br />
citizens<br />
27
5.4. Tbilisi hospitable city action plan<br />
Culture and tourism are one of the basic elements of Tbilisi attractiveness. They are also<br />
one of the main factors determining the local quality of life and settlement decisions. This<br />
is why in the effort to make Tbilisi a friendly and hospitable city it is so important to take<br />
advantage of its cultural resources and create a system that would help to recognize and<br />
promote the city internationally and to initiate a dialogue of cultures in the region while<br />
maintaining specific symbols, values and tradition brought in by the rich Georgian<br />
culture. It can contribute to strengthening Tbilisi’s position as a service center of an extra<br />
regional importance.<br />
Tbilisi and the surrounding area should meet the information requirements characteristic<br />
for modern metropolitan areas. A complex city information including an address book and<br />
the information about some of the local facilities and organizations is regarded as a mark<br />
of the city and is used to promote its image. It is also an important element of tourist<br />
promotion and a basic tool for tourism development. All the activities are aimed at a<br />
modern and integrated City Information System (CIS) for Tbilisi and, in future, for the rest<br />
of the metropolitan area.<br />
The undertaken activities are meant to strengthen the position of Tbilisi as a metropolis<br />
which is well founded in the culture of its own, of Georgia, of the Caucasus region and<br />
outside its borders. All the actions that substantiate and encourage new cultural initiatives<br />
and tourist attractions are expected to make Tbilisi a regional center of culture and<br />
tourism.<br />
The introduction of a new visual order will make getting around easier and safer for both<br />
the visitors and the local residents (information for pedestrians). It will also improve traffic<br />
(information for motorists), which should contribute to the city attractiveness and<br />
accessibility.<br />
Moreover, it has been planned to integrate the information about the city, to invest in<br />
place and infrastructure, to create a unique and recognizable quality, to generate new<br />
cultural and tourist products, to launch promotional campaign in the region and abroad, to<br />
build and strengthen the tourist potential and recognisability of Tbilisi.
Table 5-4 Tbilisi hospitable city – action plan<br />
PROGRAM<br />
See what Tbilisi is<br />
Project name Problems and project description Measures Partners<br />
We provide info you<br />
need<br />
Packet of<br />
We are improving the<br />
quality of your<br />
services<br />
We have prepared<br />
attractions you can<br />
enjoy<br />
Tourists, investors and city residents need a packet of practical information about<br />
everyday life in Tbilisi (financial services, transportation services,<br />
telecommunication, etc.)<br />
- City tourism guide book<br />
- Calendar of events<br />
- Tbilisi tourist product info<br />
- Tourism internet info and booking page<br />
- Video materials<br />
- Study tours for tour operators<br />
- Target countries campaign<br />
High quality tourist services, supporting tourist companies by training programs,<br />
certificates of quality as well as encouraging local companies to group around the<br />
service packet.<br />
Project is a key condition for Tbilisi development and the growth of its<br />
reconcilability in the region and worldwide.<br />
- Professional guides - training programs<br />
- Tbilisi hospitality – training for non professional guides<br />
- Tbilisi quality certificates<br />
- Tourism cluster development<br />
- Market analyses and customer services<br />
- Tourism product award<br />
- Tourism souvenir award<br />
An increasing number of visitors, the needs of local community and the dynamic<br />
growth of the city make it necessary to make it more attractive not only for<br />
tourists but also for the local residents.<br />
- Development of tourism paths<br />
- Support for cultural festivals and meetings<br />
- Tourism infrastructure and facilities<br />
materials<br />
developed.<br />
Ongoing activity<br />
Training<br />
curriculum’s for<br />
targeted groups<br />
of developed.<br />
Feasibility study<br />
for new tourists<br />
infrastructure.<br />
New tourist<br />
products and<br />
facilities outdoor<br />
campaign.<br />
-Tourists<br />
association<br />
- International<br />
organizations<br />
- Hotels<br />
- University<br />
-Tourists<br />
association<br />
-International<br />
organizations<br />
- Governmental<br />
organizations<br />
-Hotels<br />
-Business<br />
associations<br />
-Tourists<br />
association<br />
- International<br />
organizations<br />
- Governmental<br />
organizations<br />
- Hotels
PROGRAM<br />
Stay longer<br />
Working in Tbilisi<br />
Being a student<br />
Foreigners and people from other Georgia regions working in Tbilisi need specific<br />
info on every day life and conditions as well as tax and labor market regulations.<br />
Provide people staying in Tbilisi for work reasons with info about taxes and<br />
money transfers, labor market regulations, living conditions, city services and<br />
recreation possibilities, renting a flat and other circumstances of every day life in<br />
Tbilisi. Guide will be prepared in Georgian, English and Russian language<br />
version.<br />
Students coming from other regions of Georgia and abroad need specific info on<br />
education and life conditions.<br />
- Prepare students guidebook in electronic and hard version, in the Georgian,<br />
English, Russian languages. Packet will include info on education offers, financial<br />
support, living conditions, city attractions and leisure possibilities.<br />
Printable<br />
version will be<br />
available at city<br />
portal.<br />
Guide will be<br />
available at the<br />
city portal in the<br />
printable<br />
version.<br />
Real estate<br />
companies<br />
-State and<br />
private<br />
universities,<br />
-Vocational and<br />
training<br />
institutions<br />
30
5.5. People empower Tbilisi action plan<br />
This direction in the city strategic development will aim at maintaining the city’s business<br />
position on the Georgian market as well as at improving the competitiveness of local<br />
companies and encouraging them to offer more jobs. The activities under the strategy will<br />
promote employment and reduce unemployment as well as they will make local residents<br />
more employable.<br />
Basing on the analysis of Tbilisi workforce market some vital problems have been<br />
recognized: low employment rate, high unemployment rate and a low number of the<br />
unemployed people who choose self-employment. Main activities will focus on<br />
activisation of people who are unemployed or at risk of social exclusion and on<br />
supporting these businesses who create new jobs.<br />
This strategic development aim concentrates mainly on creating jobs for school<br />
graduates because when jobs are difficult to find it is mainly the young people who have<br />
just left vocational schools and have no or little professional experience who are at risk of<br />
long-term unemployment.<br />
The local system of education has become one of the factors generating unemployment<br />
among young people because it does not respond to market requirements. The skills<br />
structure of the workforce does not meet the demand since the system is not flexible<br />
enough and the educational offer does not reflect the development tendencies of the<br />
local business.<br />
Nowadays the employers require practical skills rather than theoretical ones and they<br />
want their future staff to have extra qualifications. Therefore it is necessary for the local<br />
schools to introduce into their curriculum student job placements in order to provide their<br />
graduates with more practical skills, which will make finding a job easier for them. So, it<br />
seems important for the educational organizations of all levels to promote<br />
entrepreneurship among their students.<br />
The activities in this field will contribute to the correlation of needs and expectations of<br />
Tbilisi business with the educational offer of local schools. The projects are also going to<br />
increase the graduates’ competitiveness on the local workforce market.<br />
The objective of this part of the development strategy is to decrease the number of the<br />
unemployed graduates of vocational high schools and universities; to increase the<br />
number of students doing job placements and the number of volunteers in local<br />
companies; to encourage companies to create more job placement opportunities for<br />
students; to improve IT technology level at schools – the beneficiaries of the project –<br />
and to supply them with modern office equipment; to increase the number and improve<br />
the quality of job advisors.
Table 5-5 People empower Tbilisi – action plan<br />
PROGRAM<br />
Future workforce<br />
PROGRAM<br />
You can upgrade Your<br />
skills<br />
Project name Problems and project description Measure Partners<br />
The changes on the workforce market can be observed not only in Tbilisi but<br />
also in other parts of the world.<br />
What will the labor<br />
market offer to you?<br />
How can you<br />
become a good<br />
specialist?<br />
Do you want to be a<br />
businessman?<br />
How to find a job<br />
Information on the market trends, the demand for jobs and a platform to<br />
exchange information between employers and the local education system is the<br />
basis to build a resource of highly qualified future workforce<br />
- conduct youth survey organize<br />
- organize workshops and debates on labor market changes and education –<br />
business round table<br />
Young people need practical information that helps them choose their line of<br />
education.<br />
Development of<br />
- career paths for most needed professions<br />
- best pupils and students fellowship<br />
Motivating and awarding the most innovative business ideas among the young<br />
people gives an additional opportunity for the local economy to develop.<br />
- best business idea awards<br />
- workshops and debates on new economy principles<br />
The city residents, the young ones in particular, need information about job offers<br />
on the dynamically changing workforce market.<br />
Development of<br />
- workforce market information system with an internet portal and one stop shop<br />
- jobs data base<br />
- workforce market survey<br />
The report on the<br />
survey, workshops<br />
and debates.<br />
Consultation with<br />
business<br />
community on<br />
internships.<br />
Best pupils and<br />
students identified<br />
Targeted career<br />
paths developed<br />
Annual awards for<br />
the best business<br />
idea.<br />
A new web site,<br />
the report on the<br />
survey .<br />
-Schools,<br />
universities,<br />
-Business<br />
organizations<br />
- Governmental<br />
institutions<br />
-Labour<br />
movement<br />
organizations.<br />
Schools,<br />
universities,<br />
-Business<br />
organizations.<br />
Schools,<br />
universities,<br />
-Business<br />
organizations.<br />
Schools,<br />
universities,<br />
-Business<br />
organizations.
PROGRAM<br />
Jobs for all<br />
How to upgrade your<br />
skills<br />
How can you<br />
upgrade or change<br />
your qualifications?<br />
Labor fairs<br />
Financing new work<br />
places.<br />
A skill to present oneself to a potential employer and the young people’s<br />
capability to enter the workforce market is a basic condition to start a<br />
professional career.<br />
Development of:<br />
- preparation of CV and an interview with an employer – workshops<br />
- language and IT trainings<br />
- support for schools and training institutions preparing citizens for work<br />
opportunities<br />
- identify potential partner at city and government level for vocational training<br />
programs<br />
The collapse of traditional industries and the development of new economy<br />
based on modern technology has forced local workers to improve their skills or<br />
change qualifications.<br />
- Data base on vocational training courses<br />
- Vocational training for most needed specialists<br />
Job turnover, growing sectors can be the topics big community meeting<br />
Organize job fairs with workshops, presentations, debates<br />
Creation of new work places support local community and generate revenues of<br />
city budget.<br />
In cooperation with the banks and international organizations develop financing<br />
frame offering credits to SME creating work places for specified groups of<br />
residents ( low income, poor, aged people, disadvantage neighborhoods).<br />
Completed<br />
workshops.<br />
Info on trainings<br />
available at the<br />
web site.<br />
Job<br />
organized<br />
annually.<br />
fairs<br />
Credit framework<br />
developed<br />
Schools,<br />
universities,<br />
-Business<br />
organizations.<br />
-Schools,<br />
universities,<br />
-Business<br />
organizations<br />
- Governmental<br />
institutions<br />
-Labour<br />
movement<br />
organizations.<br />
-Schools,<br />
universities,<br />
-Business<br />
organizations<br />
- Governmental<br />
institutions<br />
-Labour<br />
movement<br />
organizations.<br />
Banks,<br />
international<br />
organizations.<br />
33
City needs you<br />
You can take care of<br />
your neighborhood<br />
(ubani).<br />
Social exclusion is an emerging problem for all cities facing transition from<br />
traditional economy to knowledge based economy.<br />
In cooperation with housing communities and utilities temporary work places will<br />
be organized to improve quality of life in deprived neighborhoods.<br />
Community based programs can generate work places for low skilled and low<br />
income people reducing poverty issue.<br />
In cooperation with housing communities develop co-financing scheme for<br />
creation a work places for local community members taking care for public<br />
spaces within housing districts.<br />
Number of<br />
workers involved<br />
in the program.<br />
Number of<br />
generated<br />
annually work<br />
places<br />
Housing<br />
communities<br />
utilities<br />
-Housing<br />
communities<br />
- International<br />
organizations<br />
34
6. Strategy implementation principles<br />
It is crucial for strategy effective implementation that strategy objectives needs to be<br />
agreed by City Government and also accepted by entire Tbilisi community.<br />
Each of five strategic directions includes different tactics that city government should<br />
pursue - new initiatives which weren’t finance from city budget before, new organizational<br />
and operational frameworks, policy changes.<br />
It is crucial that different institutions representing all sectors and levels of government, as<br />
well as business and community leaders, international partners will be involved in to join<br />
activities.<br />
Implementing Tbilisi’s economic strategy will require mobilizing passions, leaderships,<br />
skills and available resources of entire Tbilisi community and beyond including<br />
government and international organizations.<br />
Strategy implementation will be based on three main principles:<br />
- Commitment around strategy directions. Strategy directions should be<br />
communicated through all levels of city administration, so every person working for the<br />
City Hall or other municipal unit will understand her/his role in strategy<br />
implementation’s activities. City decision makers should discuss and agreed a priority<br />
fast – track activities under each strategic direction to be implemented in coming two<br />
years. Municipal entities should incorporate these objectives into development plans<br />
and budget requests for 2008-2009.<br />
- Develop partnership with stakeholders. City leaders and specialists should share<br />
this plan with other governmental institutions, business and community partners and<br />
international organizations supporting transition of Tbilisi economy. They should<br />
engage all potential public commercial and community partners about how to move<br />
forward on strategy directions.<br />
- Monitor performance and facilitate progress. Special role in strategy<br />
implementation will play Economic Policy Agency that will have to initiate, facilitate or<br />
directly realize projects that will be selected. Organizational and professional capacity<br />
of agency will decide how effective implementation process will be. To monitor<br />
strategy implementation efficiency and observe dynamically changing city economy<br />
Economic Policy Agency should truck measures related to strategy implementation<br />
directions and publish them together with annually updated Tbilisi economy<br />
competitive report.<br />
Implementing strategy city should be aware that economic environment will continue to<br />
change. After two years to face new challenges and utilize new opportunities City should<br />
review strategy implementation and update plan in selecting priority projects for next<br />
period of 2009-2011 years.