27.12.2014 Views

Credit Ratings for European Regional and Local Governments Credit ...

Credit Ratings for European Regional and Local Governments Credit ...

Credit Ratings for European Regional and Local Governments Credit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Moody’s Investors Service<br />

<strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Ratings</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>European</strong><br />

<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Local</strong><br />

<strong>Governments</strong><br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>er Ievlev IMC(UKSIP)<br />

Business Development Officer<br />

<strong>Local</strong> Economic Development<br />

Support International Conference<br />

Tbilisi, Georgia<br />

16-17 May 2007


LRG Development Challenges<br />

<strong>Regional</strong> Economies<br />

• The public sector in CEE needs to become more efficient at restructuring<br />

• The tax base of towns <strong>and</strong> municipalities/regions is often overly dependent on a<br />

single enterprise or industry <strong>and</strong> not dependent enough on the service sector<br />

• Many CEE Sub-Sovereigns will continue to experience pressure from the growing<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> public services <strong>and</strong> social expenditure, including salaries<br />

• Investment needs will also increase pressure on the Sub-Sovereigns’ financial<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance, debt burdens <strong>and</strong> creditworthiness <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>eseeable future. The<br />

cities in CEE are mostly involved in the reconstruction <strong>and</strong> building of new road<br />

<strong>and</strong> underground lines <strong>and</strong> networks, upgrading of tram <strong>and</strong> bus fleets <strong>and</strong> the<br />

reconstruction of local water waste-treatment systems<br />

• Risk of Finance <strong>and</strong> Economy instability – possibility of revenue decrease<br />

• Poor diversification of budget income sources<br />

• Undeveloped local financial markets<br />

Deficit of funding<br />

2


Gross Borrowing by Country<br />

(million, €) 2006e % Europe 2005e % Europe 2004 % Europe 2003<br />

Western Europe<br />

Germany 130,000 60.2 125,021 59.0 90,243 56.2 73,850<br />

Italy 17,100 7.9 16,518 7.8 15,402 9.6 15,489<br />

France 15,800 7.3 15,700 7.4 15,600 14,300<br />

Spain 12,712 5.9 15,312 7.2 12,120 7.6 14,552<br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong> 11,864 5.5 13,445 6.4 13,136 8.2 14,544<br />

U.K. 4,137 1.9 5,414 2.6 5,050 3.1 3,257<br />

Austria 1,960 0.9 2,150 1.0 898 0.6 1,076<br />

Belgium 3,200 1.5 3,700 1.7 3,500 2.2 2,000<br />

Norway 2,269 1.1 2,374 1.1 2,013 1.3 2,699<br />

Finl<strong>and</strong> 715 0.3 910 0.4 1,500 0.9 1,200<br />

Denmark 600 0.3 572 0.3 612 0.4 515<br />

Sweden 438 0.2 429 0.2 361 0.2 379<br />

Total Western Europe 200,795 93.0 201,545 95.2 160,434 100.0 143,862<br />

Central <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe (CEE)<br />

Russia 8,594 4.0 6,650 3.1 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

Turkey 1,952 0.9 275 0.1 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> 1,688 0.8 1,538 0.7 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

Czech Republic 1,607 0.7 687 0.3 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

Hungary 510 0.2 156 0.1 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

Ukraine 400 0.2 251 0.1 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

Latvia 133 0.1 21 0.0 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

Romania 120 0.1 527 0.2 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

Croatia 56 0.0 59 0.0 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

Lithuania 21 0.0 0 0.0 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

Bulgaria 20 0.0 21 0.0 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

Total CEE 15,101 7.0 10,185 4.8 N.A. N.A. N.A.<br />

TOTAL EUROPE 215,896 100.0 211,730 100.0 160,434 100.0 143,862<br />

E—Estimated. N.A.-Not available.<br />

3


Bond Yield v <strong>Credit</strong> Rating<br />

4


LRG bond issuance in 2005<br />

Belgium, 0.37<br />

Ukraine, 0.27<br />

UK, 0.39<br />

Sweden, 0.19<br />

Spain, 5.34<br />

Mexico, 0.01<br />

Austria, 0.14<br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong>,<br />

1.69<br />

Russia, 2.29<br />

Estonia, 0.01 France, 1.1<br />

Canada, 24.21<br />

Germany, 50<br />

Romania, 0.63<br />

Italy, 4.84<br />

Japan, 8.53<br />

Germany<br />

Italy<br />

Japan<br />

Mexico<br />

Romania<br />

Russia<br />

Spain<br />

Sweden<br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

UK<br />

Austria<br />

Ukraine<br />

Belgium<br />

Source: DEXIA<br />

5


Factors which influence credit rating<br />

Our analysis of an RLG’s intrinsic credit quality focuses on:<br />

• Operating environment<br />

• Institutional framework<br />

• Financial condition <strong>and</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

• Debt profile<br />

• Governance <strong>and</strong> management practices<br />

• Economic fundamentals<br />

• Extraordinary support from higher-tier govt.<br />

6


Moody’s <strong>Ratings</strong> of Sovereign <strong>and</strong><br />

Sub-Sovereign <strong>Governments</strong><br />

Founded in 1900, Moody’s Investors Service has become the<br />

world’s leading provider of <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Ratings</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>Regional</strong>, Municipal <strong>and</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Governments</strong> Worldwide<br />

• Over 117 sovereign ratings<br />

• 325 ratings on sub-sovereign entities<br />

in 43 countries, including 182 ratings<br />

in Europe (compared to just 26<br />

<strong>European</strong> sub-sovereigns rated in<br />

1993)<br />

7


Moody’s in Numbers<br />

• 2,700 employees in 20 countries<br />

• 1,000 analysts, including 170 in public & local government<br />

sector<br />

• Tracks more than $35 trillion of debt<br />

• Over 100,000 public finance obligations<br />

• Over 16,500 client investors worldwide<br />

www.moodys.com<br />

www.moodyseurope.com<br />

8


Moody’s RLG Analytical Team<br />

• High Academic Qualifications<br />

• Cutting Edge Analytical Methodology<br />

• Multilingual - 11 languages spoken<br />

• Multinational - 12 nationalities represented<br />

• In depth analytical experience of public finances<br />

• Generally nationals of applicants’ countries<br />

9


Moody’s Presence in CEE Countries (as per 12.03.2007)<br />

Moody’s is a market leader in <strong>European</strong> emerging markets with 65<br />

sub-sovereign ratings including 8 Capitals. Some of them are…<br />

Hungary – Aa1<br />

City of Budapest A2<br />

Czech Republic – Aa1<br />

City of Brno A2<br />

Moravian-Silesian<br />

Region<br />

A2<br />

City of Ostrava A2<br />

City of Prague A1<br />

Bulgaria – A1<br />

City of Pazardjik<br />

Ba3<br />

Kazakhstan – A2<br />

City of Almaty Ba1<br />

City of Astana Ba1<br />

Ukraine – Ba3<br />

City of Kyiv B1<br />

City of Kharkiv B1<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> – Aa1<br />

City of Poznan<br />

A3<br />

Croatia – A1<br />

City of Zagreb Baa1<br />

Turkey – B1<br />

Metropolitan Municipality<br />

of Istanbul B1<br />

Estonia – Aa1<br />

City of Tallinn A3<br />

Russia – A2<br />

Republic of<br />

Bashkortostan<br />

Republic of Komi<br />

City of Moscow<br />

Oblast of Moscow<br />

Oblast of Perm<br />

City of<br />

St Petersburg<br />

Oblast of Samara<br />

Republic of<br />

Tatarstan<br />

Ba1<br />

Ba2<br />

Baa1<br />

Ba2<br />

Ba1<br />

Baa2<br />

Ba1<br />

Ba1<br />

Latvia – А1<br />

City of Riga<br />

А2<br />

10


Moody’s Strength<br />

• We are the credit rating agency with the largest rating<br />

coverage of Sub-Sovereign entities in Emerging Europe -<br />

including eight capital cities - Moody's is regarded as the<br />

"benchmark" rating agency <strong>for</strong> local <strong>and</strong> regional<br />

governments in that region<br />

• The team consist of Senior Analysts who are specialists in<br />

the ratings of CEE Sub-Sovereigns - ten years of experience<br />

on average, many of them also bringing direct working<br />

experience in government.<br />

• Our analytical framework is based on more than 90 years of<br />

experience in rating regional <strong>and</strong> local governments<br />

worldwide<br />

• Moody's is the agency with the most transparent <strong>and</strong><br />

advanced methodology <strong>for</strong> rating regional <strong>and</strong> local<br />

governments<br />

11


What is a <strong>Credit</strong> Rating<br />

Definition…<br />

A rating is an independent opinion on the capacity of<br />

an issuer to meet its financial obligations fully <strong>and</strong> on<br />

time<br />

Application…<br />

An essential summary on creditworthiness <strong>and</strong><br />

investment attractiveness <strong>for</strong> investment decision<br />

making process in a global capital market<br />

12


Principles & Characteristics of Moody’s <strong>Ratings</strong><br />

Principals<br />

• Independent opinion<br />

• Comparable across industry & internationally<br />

• Expression of opinion on credit risk alone<br />

Characteristics<br />

• Global consistency<br />

• Emphasis on qualitative aspects of analysis<br />

• Recognition of international <strong>and</strong> local characteristics<br />

13


What’s the Value of a Moody ’s Rating <strong>for</strong> Issuers<br />

• Provides wider access to the international financial market<br />

• Reduces funding costs<br />

• Offers a distinctive credibility to the Issuer’s financial<br />

communication<br />

• Delivers a multidimensional marketing tool to promote<br />

Issuer investment attractiveness <strong>and</strong> transparency<br />

14


What’s the Value of a Moody’s Rating<br />

•It can also serve as a multi-purpose tool:<br />

• To attract <strong>for</strong>eign direct investment<br />

• To negotiate better terms on bank loans<br />

• To develop sound budgetary policy framework<br />

• To present as a report card to the electorate<br />

15


How does a Moody ’s Rating create the Value <strong>for</strong><br />

Issuer<br />

…by providing a quick <strong>and</strong> reliable comparative assessment<br />

accepted by Investors in any financial market<br />

with…<br />

• Covering more than 90% of Eurobond market issuance<br />

(according to IFR)<br />

• Disseminating Issuers’ <strong>Ratings</strong> to over 16,500 Investors<br />

through multi-media channels<br />

16


Moody’s Rating Scale<br />

Maximum<br />

Investment<br />

Speculative<br />

Aaa<br />

Aa<br />

A<br />

Baa<br />

Ba<br />

B<br />

Caa<br />

Ca<br />

C<br />

Minimum<br />

A<br />

numerical<br />

indicator<br />

1, 2, 3<br />

applied<br />

from<br />

Aa to Ca<br />

17


Moody’s Idealised Cumulative Expected Loss<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Aaa 0.0000% 0.0001% 0.0004% 0.0010% 0.0016%<br />

Aa1 0.0003% 0.0017% 0.0055% 0.0116% 0.0171%<br />

Aa2 0.0007% 0.0044% 0.0143% 0.0259% 0.0374%<br />

Aa3 0.0017% 0.0105% 0.0325% 0.0556% 0.0781%<br />

A1 0.0032% 0.0204% 0.0644% 0.1040% 0.1436%<br />

A2 0.0060% 0.0385% 0.1221% 0.1898% 0.2569%<br />

A3 0.0214% 0.0825% 0.1980% 0.2970% 0.4015%<br />

Baa1 0.0495% 0.1540% 0.3080% 0.4565% 0.6050%<br />

Baa2 0.0935% 0.2585% 0.4565% 0.6600% 0.8690%<br />

Baa3 0.2310% 0.5775% 0.9405% 1.3090% 1.6775%<br />

Ba1 0.4785% 1.1110% 1.7215% 2.3100% 2.9040%<br />

Ba2 0.8580% 1.9085% 2.8490% 3.7400% 4.6255%<br />

Ba3 1.5455% 3.0305% 4.3285% 5.3845% 6.5230%<br />

18


What does Moody’s <strong>Credit</strong> Rating Mean <strong>for</strong> the Issuer<br />

Externally…<br />

• An “International Business Card” <strong>for</strong> a global financial<br />

market<br />

• Summarizing Issuer per<strong>for</strong>mance in a way that well fit<br />

with Investors’ mindset<br />

• Defining <strong>and</strong> diversifying the pull of potential Investors<br />

Internally…<br />

• Providing a benchmarking <strong>for</strong> an assessment of Issuer<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

• Establishing the horizons <strong>for</strong> the strategic <strong>and</strong> financial<br />

development<br />

19


Moody’s Knowledge of Sub-National Entities in CEE<br />

region<br />

Moody’s specialists will deliver a credit opinion<br />

even…<br />

• Lack of transparency in historical data<br />

• Financial reports built under local accounting st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

• Unaudited financial statements<br />

20


Analytical Considerations <strong>for</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Local</strong><br />

<strong>Governments</strong><br />

• Institutional structure <strong>and</strong> legal framework<br />

• Political climate<br />

• Economic fundamentals<br />

• Financial per<strong>for</strong>mances <strong>and</strong> management<br />

• Budget structure: revenue, expenditure<br />

• Indebtedness<br />

21


Moody’s <strong>Ratings</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> & <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Governments</strong> – 1<br />

(25 January 06)<br />

Germany - Aaa<br />

L<strong>and</strong> Baden-Wuerttemberg Aaa<br />

Freistaat Bayern<br />

Aaa<br />

L<strong>and</strong> Berlin<br />

Aa3<br />

L<strong>and</strong> Br<strong>and</strong>enburg<br />

Aa2<br />

L<strong>and</strong> Nordrhein-Westfalen Aa2<br />

L<strong>and</strong> Sachsen-Anhalt<br />

Aa3<br />

Stadt Düsseldorf<br />

Aa1<br />

Bavaria, Free State of<br />

Aaa<br />

Saxony-Anhalt, L<strong>and</strong><br />

Aa3<br />

Austria - Aaa<br />

Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft m.b.H<br />

(BIG)<br />

Aaa<br />

City of Vienna<br />

Aaa<br />

France - Aaa<br />

Region of Centre<br />

Aa2<br />

Region of Champagne-Ardenne Aa2<br />

Département de l’Essone Aaa<br />

Département des Hauts-de-Seine Aa1<br />

Region Ile-de-France<br />

Aaa<br />

Communauté Urbaine de Lille Aaa<br />

Département du Lot-et-Garonne A2<br />

City of Lyon<br />

Aa2<br />

Département de la Manche Aa1<br />

Département de la Marne Aaa<br />

City of Marseille<br />

Aaa<br />

Département de la Meuse Aaa<br />

City of Narbonne<br />

Aa3<br />

Region of Rhone-Alpes<br />

Aaa<br />

City of Saint M<strong>and</strong>é<br />

Aa2<br />

City of Villeurbanne<br />

Aa1<br />

City of Plan-de-Cuques<br />

Aa1<br />

Italy– Aa2<br />

Region of Abruzzo A1<br />

Province of Arezzo Aa3 City of Milan<br />

Region of Basilicata A1 Province of Milan<br />

City of Bologna<br />

Aa2 Region of Molise<br />

City of Bari<br />

Aa3 City of Naples<br />

Province of Bologna Aa3 Province of Naples<br />

Province of Bolzano Aa1 City of Palermo<br />

Region of Calabria A2 Province of Palermo<br />

Region of Campania A3 Region of Puglia<br />

City of Catania<br />

A2 City of Rimini<br />

City of Civitavecchia A1 Province of Rimini<br />

Region of Emilia RomagnaAa2 Region of Sardinia<br />

City of Florence<br />

Aa2 Region of Sicily<br />

Province of Foggia A2 Province of Trento<br />

Province of Genoa Aa3 Province of Treviso<br />

City of La Spezia<br />

A1 Province of Turin<br />

City of L’Aquila<br />

A1 Region of Tuscany<br />

Region of Lazio<br />

A1 Region of Umbria<br />

City of Lecce<br />

A2 Region of Veneto<br />

Region of Liguria Aa3 City of Venice<br />

Region of Lombardy Aa1<br />

Region of Marche Aa3<br />

Belgium – Aa1<br />

Communauté Française de<br />

Belgique<br />

Aa1<br />

Community of Fl<strong>and</strong>ers Aa1<br />

Walloon Region<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa2<br />

Aa3<br />

A2<br />

A1<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa3<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa3<br />

A2<br />

A2<br />

Aa1<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa2<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa2<br />

Aa2<br />

22


Moody’s <strong>Ratings</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> & <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Governments</strong> - 2<br />

(25 January 06)<br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong> - Aaa<br />

City of Neuchatel<br />

Aa3<br />

Norway – Aaa<br />

Oslo City<br />

Aa1<br />

Isle of Man - Aaa<br />

Sweden - Aaa<br />

City of Gothenburg<br />

City of Stockholm<br />

Aa2<br />

Aa1<br />

Spain – Aaa<br />

Diputación de Guipuzcoa<br />

Junta de Andalucia<br />

City of Barcelona<br />

Basque Country<br />

Comunidad de Cantabria<br />

Junta de Castilla y Leon<br />

Castilla-La Mancha<br />

Generalitat de Catalunya<br />

Junta de Extremadura<br />

Comunidad de Galicia<br />

Comunidad de Murcia<br />

Cabildo de Tenerife<br />

Generalitat de Valencia<br />

Portugal – Aa2<br />

Autonomous Region of Azores<br />

City of Lisbon<br />

Region of Madeira<br />

City of Sintra<br />

Aaa<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa2<br />

Aaa<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa2<br />

Aa2<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa2<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa2<br />

Aa3<br />

Aa2<br />

Denmark - Aaa<br />

City of Copenhagen<br />

Estonia – A1<br />

City of Tallinn<br />

Greece – A1<br />

Municipality of Amaroussion<br />

City of Athens<br />

Aa1<br />

A3<br />

Baa2<br />

A2<br />

23


Moody’s <strong>Ratings</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> & <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Governments</strong> – 3<br />

(25 January 06)<br />

Hungary – A1<br />

City of Budapest<br />

Bulgaria – Ba1<br />

City of Varna<br />

City of Pazardjik<br />

A3<br />

B1<br />

Ba3<br />

Russia – Baa3<br />

Republic of Bashkortostan<br />

Republic of Komi<br />

City of Moscow<br />

Oblast of Moscow<br />

Oblast of Perm<br />

City of St Petersburg<br />

Republic of Sakha<br />

Oblast of Samara<br />

Republic of Tatarstan<br />

Ba1<br />

Ba3<br />

Baa2<br />

Ba3<br />

Ba1<br />

Baa2<br />

Caa3<br />

Ba2<br />

Ba1<br />

Czech Republic – A1<br />

City of Brno<br />

Moravian-Silesian Region<br />

City of Ostrava<br />

City of Prague<br />

A3<br />

A3<br />

A3<br />

A2<br />

Kazakhstan – Baa3<br />

City of Almaty<br />

City of Astana<br />

Ba1<br />

Ba1<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> – A2<br />

City of Poznan<br />

Baa1<br />

Ukraine – B1<br />

City of Kyiv<br />

City of Kharkiv<br />

B2<br />

B2<br />

Croatia – Baa3<br />

City of Zagreb<br />

Baa3<br />

Turkey – B1<br />

Metropolitan Municipality of Istanbul B1<br />

24


Moody’s Contacts<br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>er Ievlev – Business Development Officer, EMEA<br />

Tel: +44(0) 20 7772 8754<br />

E-mail: alex<strong>and</strong>er.ievlev@moodys.com<br />

Larissa Malycheva – Senior Vice-President,<br />

Head of Business Development, EMEA<br />

Tel: +44(0) 20 7772 5590<br />

E-mail: larissa.malycheva@moodys.com<br />

25


Moody’s Investors Service<br />

Thank You <strong>for</strong> Your<br />

Attention<br />

Q&A<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!