04.11.2014 Views

PRK with Schwind ESIRIS Excimer Laser and C3R Treatment in ...

PRK with Schwind ESIRIS Excimer Laser and C3R Treatment in ...

PRK with Schwind ESIRIS Excimer Laser and C3R Treatment in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

556 AIOC 2010 PROCEEDINGS<br />

<strong>PRK</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Schw<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>ESIRIS</strong> <strong>Excimer</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>C3R</strong> <strong>Treatment</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

Keratoconus Patients <strong>in</strong> the Same Sitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Collagen cross-l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>C3R</strong>), though<br />

established primarily as a tectonic procedure<br />

for eyes <strong>with</strong> keratoconus, has also been found to<br />

have a relatively predictable refractive outcome,<br />

albeit of a small magnitude.1 Photorefractive<br />

keratectomy (<strong>PRK</strong>), as aga<strong>in</strong>st laser <strong>in</strong> situ<br />

keratomileusis, is a relatively safe refractive<br />

procedure for eyes <strong>with</strong> keratoconus <strong>with</strong> th<strong>in</strong><br />

corneas, more so if corneal ablation is performed<br />

Dr. Kumar J. Doctor<br />

(Present<strong>in</strong>g Author: Dr. Kumar J. Doctor)<br />

to undercorrect the refractive error. The residual<br />

refractive error could then be elim<strong>in</strong>ated by the<br />

<strong>C3R</strong> process, when applied upon the bed of<br />

ablated corneal tissue. The purpose of our study<br />

was thus to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether a small optic zone<br />

(5.5 mm) photorefractive keratectomy along <strong>with</strong><br />

collagen cross l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g could be comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle procedure <strong>in</strong> terms of predictability of<br />

refractive outcome <strong>and</strong> safety <strong>in</strong> eyes <strong>with</strong>


REFRACTIVE SURGERY SESSION<br />

557<br />

keratoconus.<br />

Materials <strong>and</strong> Methods<br />

The prospective, non-comparative, <strong>in</strong>terventional<br />

study employed 3 eyes of 3 patients <strong>with</strong><br />

established keratoconus as per Orbscan II<br />

(Bausch <strong>and</strong> Lomb) criteria. Their preoperative<br />

refractive error, keratometry <strong>and</strong> pachymetry<br />

details were noted. For analysis reasons, all<br />

cyl<strong>in</strong>drical errors were converted <strong>in</strong>to their<br />

spherical equivalents. The 3 eyes underwent <strong>PRK</strong><br />

by the rout<strong>in</strong>e procedure, except that the<br />

diameter of corneal ablation selected was 5.5 mm<br />

(optic zone) <strong>and</strong> the ablation was aimed at<br />

leav<strong>in</strong>g a residual spherical error of -2 D Sph.<br />

This meant that all cyl<strong>in</strong>drical error was<br />

attempted to be elim<strong>in</strong>ated by <strong>PRK</strong>. The ablation<br />

depth thus achieved <strong>and</strong> the residual stromal bed<br />

thickness was noted <strong>in</strong> all cases. <strong>C3R</strong> by the<br />

rout<strong>in</strong>e procedure was then applied upon the<br />

residual stromal bed. Postoperatively, residual<br />

refractive error, keratometry <strong>and</strong> pachymetry<br />

details were noted on the first postoperative day<br />

<strong>and</strong> then every month for 5 months. A note of<br />

any adverse events <strong>in</strong>clusive of regression <strong>and</strong><br />

ectasia were noted at the end of 5 months followup<br />

period. S<strong>in</strong>ce the sample size was small <strong>and</strong><br />

the parameters non-Gaussian <strong>in</strong> nature, analysis<br />

was performed us<strong>in</strong>g both parametric as well as<br />

non-parametric statistical methods.<br />

Results<br />

Three eyes of 3 patients completed the entire 5<br />

months follow-up. The preoperative pachymetry<br />

noted was 469.3 + 7.02 (mean + SD) microns<br />

(median = 470 microns, range 462 to 476 microns)<br />

<strong>with</strong> a preoperative refractive error of -4.7 + 0.8 D<br />

Sph (median = -4.5 D Sph, range -4 to -5 D Sph).<br />

Two out of 3 eyes had cyl<strong>in</strong>drical error which<br />

was reduced to its spherical equivalent. The<br />

ablation depth achieved <strong>with</strong> the small optic<br />

zone <strong>PRK</strong> was found to be 36.7 + 11.7 microns<br />

(median = 32 microns, range 28 to 50 microns).<br />

At 5 months follow-up, the residual refractive<br />

error was found to be 0.17 + 0.14 D Sph (median<br />

= 0.25 D Sph, range 0 to 0.25 D Sph). No<br />

regression or ectasia was noted <strong>in</strong> any case at the<br />

end of 5 months follow-up. No persistent corneal<br />

1. V<strong>in</strong>ciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, Seiler T, Epste<strong>in</strong> D.<br />

Intraoperative <strong>and</strong> postoperative effects of corneal<br />

collagen cross-l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g on progressive keratoconus.<br />

References<br />

haze was seen <strong>in</strong> any eye at the end of 5 months<br />

follow-up. Pachymetry performed at 5 months<br />

was 426.7 + 15.3 microns (median = 430 microns,<br />

range 410 to 440 microns). This was found to be<br />

statistically <strong>in</strong>significant (p = 0.53, paired t test)<br />

compared to the pachymetry obta<strong>in</strong>ed on the first<br />

post operative day 428 + 16 microns (median =<br />

428 microns, range 412 to 444 microns).<br />

Discussion<br />

As an <strong>in</strong>dividual procedure, <strong>C3R</strong> has been<br />

known to give good refractive outcomes <strong>in</strong> eyes<br />

<strong>with</strong> keratoconus/ corneal ectasia post LASIK,<br />

rang<strong>in</strong>g from 1 D Sph at 6 months2 up to 2 D Sph<br />

at 1 year.3 When <strong>C3R</strong> was applied <strong>with</strong><br />

conductive keratoplasty, there was no significant<br />

change <strong>in</strong> the refractive outcome.4 The above,<br />

coupled <strong>with</strong> the cl<strong>in</strong>ical experience of over a 100<br />

eyes <strong>with</strong> <strong>C3R</strong> performed <strong>in</strong> our practice, <strong>in</strong> our<br />

study, it was assumed that a residual refractive<br />

error of 2 D Sph be kept after <strong>PRK</strong> for <strong>C3R</strong> to<br />

work upon.<br />

On attempt<strong>in</strong>g to perform a literature review of<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>PRK</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>C3R</strong>, there was presently<br />

just one report by Kymionis et al5 of 14 eyes<br />

show<strong>in</strong>g excellent results. Our study showed<br />

comparable results <strong>in</strong> terms of refractive<br />

outcome. Also, <strong>in</strong> our study, it was noted that<br />

<strong>C3R</strong> applied post <strong>PRK</strong> on the residual stromal<br />

bed did not significantly alter corneal<br />

pachymetry at 5 months. This is comparable to a<br />

study by Kymionis et al6 where corneal<br />

pachymetry did not alter <strong>in</strong>tra <strong>and</strong> post<br />

operatively after perform<strong>in</strong>g <strong>C3R</strong> for<br />

keratoconus. No eyes were noted to have<br />

persistent haze at 5 months follow-up. We could<br />

thus establish not only the efficacy, but also the<br />

safety of a comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>PRK</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>C3R</strong>. However,<br />

the <strong>in</strong>herent limitations of our study rema<strong>in</strong> its<br />

small sample size, absence of a control arm <strong>and</strong> a<br />

relatively short follow-up.<br />

As a comb<strong>in</strong>ed procedure, <strong>in</strong> our pilot series,<br />

<strong>PRK</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>C3R</strong> gives predictable refractive<br />

outcomes <strong>with</strong> no significant adverse events.<br />

However, the same needs to be established by a<br />

comparative trial <strong>with</strong> a larger sample <strong>and</strong> a<br />

longer follow-up.<br />

Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127(10):1258-65.<br />

2. Wittig-Silva C, Whit<strong>in</strong>g M, Lamoureux E, et al. A<br />

r<strong>and</strong>omized controlled trial of corneal collagen


558 AIOC 2010 PROCEEDINGS<br />

cross-l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> progressive keratoconus:<br />

prelim<strong>in</strong>ary results. J Refract Surg 2008;24(7):S720-<br />

5.<br />

3. V<strong>in</strong>ciguerra P, Camesasca FI, Albè E, Trazza S.<br />

Corneal Collagen Cross-L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g for Ectasia After<br />

<strong>Excimer</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> Refractive Surgery: 1-Year Results. J<br />

Refract Surg 2009;22:1-12.<br />

4. Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Naoumidi TL,<br />

Kazakos DC, Giapitzakis I, Pallikaris IG.<br />

Conductive Keratoplasty Followed by Collagen<br />

Cross-L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g With Riboflav<strong>in</strong>-UV-A <strong>in</strong> Patients<br />

With Keratoconus. Cornea 2009 Dec 16. [Epub<br />

ahead of pr<strong>in</strong>t]<br />

5. Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Kounis GA, et al.<br />

Simultaneous topography-guided <strong>PRK</strong> followed by<br />

corneal collagen cross-l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g for keratoconus. J<br />

Refract Sur 2009;25(9):S807-11.<br />

6. Kymionis GD, Kounis GA, Portaliou DM, et al.<br />

Intraoperative pachymetric measurements dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

corneal collagen cross-l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>with</strong> riboflav<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

ultraviolet A irradiation. Ophthalmology<br />

2009;116(12):2336-9.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!