06.11.2014 Views

DFS Resource Assessment - Delaware Department of Agriculture

DFS Resource Assessment - Delaware Department of Agriculture

DFS Resource Assessment - Delaware Department of Agriculture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thousands <strong>of</strong> Acres<br />

Criterion 2: Maintenance <strong>of</strong> Productive Capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> Forest Ecosystems<br />

Importance: Healthy forests provide a wide variety <strong>of</strong><br />

services and benefits including enhanced water<br />

quality, oxygen, wildlife habitat, recreational<br />

opportunities, and wood. Forests must be managed<br />

sustainably, and all <strong>of</strong> these benefits must be<br />

considered, if we are to continue to enjoy productive<br />

forest ecosystems. Tracking not only the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

forestland available for producing goods and services<br />

but also the productivity <strong>of</strong> that land and the<br />

resources harvested is important to ensure their<br />

sustainable management.<br />

Indicator 5: Area <strong>of</strong> timberland.<br />

Introduction: Timberland is defined as any forestland<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> producing trees that may be pr<strong>of</strong>itably and<br />

legally harvested. The amount <strong>of</strong> timberland in the<br />

State defines the total forest land base available to<br />

produce goods and services for the benefit <strong>of</strong> society.<br />

Of the state’s 376,000 forested acres in 2002, over 98<br />

percent were classified as timberland. The remaining two<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the state’s forestland is located in areas where<br />

regulations prohibit timber harvest or, in very few cases,<br />

the soil is not capable <strong>of</strong> producing a viable timber crop<br />

(such as pockets <strong>of</strong> upland within tidal marshes).<br />

Timberland acreage has declined slightly since 1950, as<br />

shown in Figure 12. The <strong>DFS</strong> believes that the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

timberland has decreased since 2002 due to development<br />

and changing landowner goals.<br />

Figure 12. Acres <strong>of</strong> Timberland in 1953, 1987, and 2002.<br />

Indicator 6: Annual removal <strong>of</strong> merchantable wood<br />

volume compared to net growth.<br />

Introduction: Forests provide valuable products<br />

that can be periodically harvested. Forests are also<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> living trees with quantifiable rates <strong>of</strong><br />

growth. To a large extent, the difference between rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> growth and rate <strong>of</strong> removal determines whether the<br />

resource base is being used in a sustainable manner.<br />

Growth <strong>of</strong> all species has exceeded removal for more than<br />

40 years. However, removal <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>twood growing stock<br />

has consistently exceeded growth (Table 7). This fact is<br />

partly responsible for the decline <strong>of</strong> loblolly pine since the<br />

mid-twentieth century (see previous discussion within<br />

Indicator 2). At the same time, hardwood growth has<br />

exceeded hardwood removal <strong>of</strong> growing stock for every<br />

measurement period since 1959, although hardwood<br />

removals increased dramatically between 1987 and 1999 –<br />

reflecting some new and expanded markets for this<br />

resource. Because pine acreage has declined, net s<strong>of</strong>twood<br />

growth has been reduced, despite sustainable management<br />

<strong>of</strong> individual pine stands. This trend is a concern and<br />

future inventories should closely track the changes in the<br />

pine growing stock.<br />

Table 7. Growth and removals <strong>of</strong> growing stock,<br />

millions <strong>of</strong> cubic feet, 1959-1999.<br />

S<strong>of</strong>twoods<br />

Year Growth Removal Net<br />

1959 6.5 9 -2.5<br />

1971 4.6 8.1 -3.5<br />

1987 4.1 4.6 -0.5<br />

1999 4.2 6.7 -2.5<br />

Hardwoods<br />

Year Growth Removal Net<br />

1959 12.5 4.5 8<br />

1971 14.6 4.4 10.2<br />

1987<br />

9.4 4.7 4.7<br />

1999 12.1 7.7 4.4<br />

Source: U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis.<br />

1953 1987 2002<br />

Source: U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis.<br />

Conclusions: <strong>Delaware</strong>’s timberland area has remained<br />

constant relative to total forest acreage over the last 50<br />

years. The increase in the rate <strong>of</strong> development has<br />

impacted the forest land base, and as a result, total<br />

acreage <strong>of</strong> timberland has declined slightly.<br />

The surplus growth <strong>of</strong> hardwood species also presents an<br />

opportunity. There is growing attention and desire for<br />

sustainable, renewable energy sources. Much <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Delaware</strong>’s hardwood growth is concentrated in low-value<br />

timber species, such as red maple (now <strong>Delaware</strong>’s most<br />

common tree species), sweetgum, and blackgum (black<br />

tupelo) (See Table 2 and Figure 7 in Criterion 1 text).<br />

While <strong>Delaware</strong> – or the entire Eastern Shore peninsula –<br />

does not contain enough forestland to support a major<br />

energy plant, there are sufficient low-value hardwood<br />

species to support regional or local systems, such as a<br />

heat/energy system for schools or small industry.<br />

<strong>Delaware</strong> Forest <strong>Resource</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!