07.11.2014 Views

Rough seas for BC economy - Institute of Chartered Accountants of BC

Rough seas for BC economy - Institute of Chartered Accountants of BC

Rough seas for BC economy - Institute of Chartered Accountants of BC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

October 2009<br />

<strong>Rough</strong> <strong>seas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>BC</strong> <strong>economy</strong><br />

On the Cover<br />

The 2009 <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up report<br />

shows mixed results <strong>for</strong> 2008<br />

and a rough start <strong>for</strong> 2009.<br />

What does the future hold?<br />

In this issue<br />

News from the Executive Tour<br />

Crystallizing the capital gains exemption<br />

Don’t abdicate your pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

judgment


Left to Right:<br />

Farida Sukhia, Chris Halsey-Brandt, Ron Parks, Spencer Cotton,<br />

Rosanne Terhart, Robert D. Mackay, Gary M. W. Mynett, Hugh G. Livingstone,<br />

Cheryl Shearer, Jeff P. Matthews, Kiu Ghanavizchian, Vern Blai r.<br />

Blair Mackay Mynett Valuations Inc.<br />

is the leading independent business valuation and litigation support practice in British<br />

Columbia. Our practice focus is on business valuations, mergers and acquisitions,<br />

economic loss claims, <strong>for</strong>ensic accounting and other litigation accounting matters.<br />

We can be part <strong>of</strong> your team, providing you with the experience your clients require.<br />

Suite 1100<br />

1177 West Hastings Street<br />

Vancouver, <strong>BC</strong>, V6E 4T5<br />

Telephone: 604.687.4544<br />

Facsimile: 604.687.4577<br />

www.bmmvaluations.com<br />

Vern Blair: 604.697.5276<br />

Rob Mackay: 604.697.5201<br />

Gary Mynett: 604.697.5202<br />

Ron Parks: 604.697.5242<br />

Hugh Livingstone: 604.697.5238<br />

Spencer Cotton: 604.697.5212<br />

Jeff Matthews: 604.697.5203<br />

Cheryl Shearer: 604.697.5293<br />

Rosanne Terhart: 604.697.5286<br />

Farida Sukhia: 604.697.5271<br />

Chris Halsey-Brandt: 604.697.5294<br />

Kiu Ghanavizchian: 604.697.5297


contents<br />

On the Cover<br />

8<br />

Checking Up on the<br />

Provincial Economy<br />

What our provincial <strong>BC</strong><br />

Check-Up report reveals<br />

about living, working, and<br />

investing in <strong>BC</strong><br />

26<br />

CA Social Networking Group<br />

Hosts Baseball BBQ<br />

4 Notes from the CEO<br />

Thoughts on the <strong>economy</strong><br />

6 For the Pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

News from the Executive Tour<br />

16 Tax Traps & Tips<br />

Crystallizing the capital gains<br />

exemption in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

business succession<br />

18 PD News<br />

Fall PD highlights<br />

20 Plugged In<br />

News <strong>for</strong> and about members<br />

& students<br />

Movers and shakers in the<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

Reminder: Nominations <strong>for</strong><br />

the election <strong>of</strong> FCAs<br />

Nominate a future president<br />

30 Ethical Dilemmas<br />

Don’t abdicate your<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment<br />

Want to get<br />

the word out?<br />

Advertise in Beyond Numbers!<br />

Here’s why:<br />

90% <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong> CAs surveyed read<br />

Beyond Numbers<br />

Beyond Numbers goes out to<br />

more than 9,000 members,<br />

more than 1,800 students,<br />

and over 200 external<br />

stakeholders—including<br />

other institutes, associations,<br />

and pr<strong>of</strong>essional organizations<br />

Beyond Numbers has won<br />

awards <strong>for</strong> both content<br />

and design, including<br />

Blue Wave Awards <strong>of</strong> Merit<br />

from the International<br />

Association <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

Communications – <strong>BC</strong> Branch<br />

To place an ad in<br />

Beyond Numbers, contact our<br />

representatives at:<br />

Advertising in Print<br />

Tel: 604-681-1811<br />

710 – 938 Howe St.<br />

Vancouver, <strong>BC</strong> V6Z 1N9<br />

Fax: 604-681-0456<br />

Email:<br />

info@advertisinginprint.com<br />

10%<br />

Cert no. SCS-COC-00867


October 2009, No.482<br />

Published eight times annually by the<br />

<strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chartered</strong> <strong>Accountants</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> British Columbia.<br />

Editor<br />

Michelle McRae<br />

Thoughts on the<br />

<strong>economy</strong><br />

Design<br />

Blindfolio Design<br />

604-761-9212<br />

Advertising<br />

Advertising In Print<br />

Phone: 604-681-1811<br />

Fax: 604-681-0456<br />

Senior Director <strong>of</strong> External Affairs<br />

Lesley MacGregor<br />

<strong>Institute</strong> Council<br />

Karen Keilty, FCA<br />

President<br />

Peter Norwood, CA<br />

1st Vice-President<br />

Lenard Boggio, FCA<br />

2nd Vice-President<br />

Michael Macdonell, CA<br />

Treasurer<br />

Jack Arnold, CA<br />

Linda Lee Brougham, CA<br />

Kyman Chan, CA<br />

Karen Christiansen, CA<br />

John Craw<strong>for</strong>d, CA<br />

Gordon Holloway, FCA<br />

David Hughes<br />

Anthony Mayer, CA<br />

Al McNair<br />

Sheila Nelson, CA<br />

John Sims, FCA<br />

James Topham, CA<br />

Kenneth Tung<br />

Praveen Vohora, CA<br />

Chief Executive Officer<br />

Richard Rees, FCA<br />

Beyond Numbers is printed in British Columbia and<br />

mailed eight times annually to more than 9,000<br />

chartered accountants and more than 1,800 CA students<br />

in public practice, industry, education, and government<br />

service throughout <strong>BC</strong>, Canada, and other countries.<br />

Beyond Numbers’ editorial and business <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

are located at:<br />

Suite 500, One Bentall Centre, 505 Burrard St., Box 22<br />

Vancouver, <strong>BC</strong> V7X 1M4<br />

Phone: 604-681-3264<br />

Toll-free in <strong>BC</strong>: 1-800-663-2677<br />

Fax: 604-681-1523<br />

Internet: www.ica.bc.ca<br />

Opinions expressed are not necessarily<br />

endorsed by the <strong>Institute</strong>.<br />

Beyond Numbers supports the CA pr<strong>of</strong>ession in <strong>BC</strong><br />

by sharing news from the <strong>Institute</strong> and news about<br />

members, by sharing viewpoints on issues <strong>of</strong> specific<br />

interest to members, and by promoting member<br />

involvement in <strong>Institute</strong> activities.<br />

Publications Mail Agreement No: 40062742<br />

Notes from the CEO<br />

What a difference a year can make. Just 12 months ago, <strong>BC</strong><br />

had one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing economies in Canada. While the <strong>for</strong>estry sector<br />

was struggling, the overall unemployment rate was still relatively low, and <strong>for</strong><br />

the most part, we seemed to be working through the economic downturn. That<br />

all changed, however, with the financial meltdown last October, as the prices <strong>of</strong><br />

all <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s export commodities sank, and the province lost its tenuous grip on<br />

prosperity.<br />

This reversal <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>tune is reflected in the 2009 <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up report, which<br />

details how our <strong>economy</strong> held its own <strong>for</strong> most <strong>of</strong> 2008, then took a sharp<br />

downturn in 2009. Specifically, the report indicates that while <strong>BC</strong> made strides<br />

in many LIVE and WORK indicators last year, much room <strong>for</strong> improvement<br />

remains when it comes to our INVEST indicators—especially with respect to<br />

productivity, exports, and corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its.<br />

It’s important to put the downturn in context. While <strong>BC</strong>’s <strong>economy</strong> has taken a<br />

hit since last fall, so too have the economies <strong>of</strong> our closest competitors. In<br />

addition, <strong>BC</strong>’s move to the HST will help maintain a competitive business and<br />

taxation climate, and should encourage investment.<br />

With the <strong>economy</strong> top <strong>of</strong> mind, we <strong>of</strong>fer this month’s cover story, which<br />

highlights the results <strong>of</strong> the 2009 <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up and features updated statistics<br />

<strong>for</strong> several economic indicators.<br />

The <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up is a central pillar <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Institute</strong>’s public affairs program,<br />

providing CAs across the province with an opportunity to <strong>of</strong>fer commentary<br />

on the <strong>economy</strong>. This year, we’re reshaping the process a bit. Hard copies <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up will no longer be produced, but, as in previous years, members<br />

will be able to access and download the report from the <strong>Institute</strong>’s website at<br />

www.bccheckup.com.<br />

Comments or questions on this topic? Contact me at rees@ica.bc.ca.<br />

—Richard Rees, FCA<br />

Want to contribute to the <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up? Contact Kerri Brkich, our manager<br />

<strong>of</strong> public affairs, at 604-488-2625 or brkich@ica.bc.ca.<br />

4 ica.bc.ca October ’09


NEW<br />

the A<strong>BC</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

A complimentary e-learning course is now<br />

available to help you get started on the transition<br />

to International Financial Reporting Standards.<br />

This four part on-line program will provide you with the<br />

foundation you need to build your IFRS knowledge. Visit our<br />

dedicated web site and get started today.<br />

Your trusted source <strong>for</strong> everything IFRS.<br />

www.cica.ca/IFRS<br />

1297<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 5


For the Pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

Executive Tour<br />

Addresses Key<br />

Pressures on <strong>BC</strong><br />

and the Pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

By Karen Keilty, FCA<br />

President<br />

By the time this issue <strong>of</strong> Beyond Numbers<br />

reaches your mailbox, I, along with the<br />

<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>’s executive team, will have<br />

visited Cranbrook, Kelowna, Vernon, Penticton,<br />

and Kamloops during the annual Executive<br />

Tour. While several other stops are planned over<br />

the next few months, I know that we will not<br />

reach all <strong>of</strong> you. So <strong>for</strong> those <strong>of</strong> you who cannot<br />

attend the remaining meetings, this article <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

a brief outline <strong>of</strong> the issues being addressed this<br />

year.<br />

The <strong>economy</strong><br />

We know the state <strong>of</strong> the <strong>BC</strong> <strong>economy</strong> is a concern<br />

<strong>for</strong> many members. During the Executive<br />

Tour, we are sharing details from the 2009<br />

edition <strong>of</strong> the provincial <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up report,<br />

and discussing what the report reveals in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> the current <strong>economy</strong>. (For more details on<br />

the report, please see the cover story on page 8.)<br />

Ensuring the continued<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

Today, the <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> has approximately<br />

10,000 members and 2,000 students—record<br />

numbers in both categories. While we are<br />

proud to have so many qualified people in the<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession, we also recognize that demographics<br />

and market growth <strong>for</strong> services will continue to<br />

increase the demand <strong>for</strong> CAs in the future. We<br />

are mindful <strong>of</strong> this reality as we continue<br />

developing a strategy to ensure the pr<strong>of</strong>ession’s<br />

continued growth.<br />

During the Tour, we are updating members<br />

about a part <strong>of</strong> this strategy that has already been<br />

implemented: the new practical experience<br />

requirements <strong>for</strong> students.<br />

As detailed in the September 2009 issue <strong>of</strong><br />

Beyond Numbers (pages 12-13), the introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> new practical experience requirements in<br />

September 2007 means that CA students can<br />

now train outside <strong>of</strong> audit and assurance to earn<br />

their designations. This change in experience<br />

requirements creates new opportunities <strong>for</strong> CAs<br />

in public practice and in industry.<br />

In <strong>BC</strong>, we have welcomed industry employers<br />

Telus and PRA group into our training<br />

program. They join CA firms Deloitte &<br />

Touche LLP (Tax & FAS), KPMG LLP (Tax),<br />

and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Tax), which<br />

have taken this opportunity to expand their<br />

training programs into new areas.<br />

I encourage each <strong>of</strong> you to think about whether<br />

you work in the right environment to train the<br />

next generation <strong>of</strong> CAs. If you think you do,<br />

visit www.CATOadvantage.ca or contact Lara<br />

Greguric, CA, director <strong>of</strong> CA Training Offices<br />

<strong>for</strong> CASB, at greguric@casb.com, or Harp<br />

Bagri, CA, manager <strong>of</strong> CA Training Office<br />

Liaison <strong>for</strong> CASB, at bagri@casb.com, to find<br />

out how you can get involved.<br />

The expanded experience opportunities create<br />

an opportunity <strong>for</strong> the CA pr<strong>of</strong>ession to broaden<br />

the types <strong>of</strong> students trained and expand the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> students in the pr<strong>of</strong>ession as a whole.<br />

As our <strong>economy</strong> grows and more baby boomers<br />

retire, growth in the number <strong>of</strong> new members<br />

and in the range <strong>of</strong> their training will help ensure<br />

that the CA pr<strong>of</strong>ession remains the<br />

preferred choice <strong>for</strong> business, government, and<br />

not-<strong>for</strong>-pr<strong>of</strong>it organizations.<br />

Implementing new standards<br />

The Executive Tour also gives us an opportunity<br />

to update members about the status and<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> new standards, and to<br />

remind members <strong>of</strong> the various resources that<br />

are available.<br />

IFRS<br />

As the January 1, 2011 conversion date nears,<br />

IFRS remains a hot topic. A wide variety <strong>of</strong><br />

resources are available to help members make<br />

the transition to IFRS. In particular, a very<br />

useful one-stop source <strong>for</strong> IFRS news can be<br />

found at www.cica.ca/IFRS.<br />

Private enterprise GAAP<br />

The comment deadline <strong>for</strong> the Exposure Draft<br />

on private enterprise GAAP has closed. The<br />

Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) received<br />

over 170 responses, and AcSB staff members also<br />

received feedback at stakeholder consultations<br />

across the country. At the time <strong>of</strong> this writing<br />

(mid-September 2009), the AcSB is in the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> reviewing the comments received,<br />

with the objective <strong>of</strong> issuing the standards in<br />

early 2010. We will continue to provide updates<br />

as we learn more.<br />

Upcoming Executive Tour dates (check <strong>for</strong> more dates at www.ica.bc.ca)<br />

Nelson/Castlegar/Trail<br />

Thursday, October 8, 2009<br />

5:30 pm: “No-Host Reception”<br />

6:00 pm: Dinner<br />

Victoria<br />

Wednesday, November 18, 2009<br />

12:00 pm: Lunch<br />

Duncan<br />

Thursday, November 19, 2009<br />

12:00 pm: Lunch<br />

Nanaimo<br />

Thursday, November 19, 2009<br />

5:30 pm: “No-Host Reception”<br />

6:00 pm: Dinner<br />

Campbell River<br />

Friday, November 20, 2009<br />

12:00 pm: Lunch<br />

Prince George<br />

Tuesday, November 24, 2009<br />

12:00 pm: Lunch<br />

6 ica.bc.ca October ’09


Financial reporting <strong>for</strong> NPOs<br />

Together with the Public Sector Accounting<br />

Board (PSAB), the AcSB is also deliberating on<br />

the future direction <strong>of</strong> financial reporting <strong>for</strong><br />

not-<strong>for</strong>-pr<strong>of</strong>it organizations. Stay tuned <strong>for</strong><br />

more in<strong>for</strong>mation in early 2010.<br />

New auditing standards<br />

Although the new auditing standards will come<br />

into effect <strong>for</strong> audits <strong>of</strong> financial statements with<br />

the year ended on or after December 14, 2010,<br />

the new quality control standard will actually<br />

come into effect a full year earlier, on December<br />

15, 2009. This new quality control standard will<br />

be applicable to firms that per<strong>for</strong>m audits and/or<br />

review engagements. It will also apply to many<br />

small practitioners, as the new standard will<br />

stipulate that anyone involved in the per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

or quality control review <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />

engagement can no longer conduct an inspection<br />

<strong>of</strong> that engagement as part <strong>of</strong> the firm’s<br />

monitoring. This change will mean that sole<br />

practitioners who have previously self-inspected<br />

files will no longer be able to do so, effective<br />

December 15, 2009.<br />

To help practitioners make this change, the<br />

ICA<strong>BC</strong> has created a posting board at www.ica.bc.ca<br />

under Member Centre>Management In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

and Tools>Trading <strong>of</strong> Quality Control Services<br />

(direct: www.ica.bc.ca/kb.php3?catid=1083), where<br />

members can post requests to trade quality<br />

control services with other members.<br />

Keeping you in<strong>for</strong>med<br />

I look <strong>for</strong>ward to speaking with more <strong>of</strong> you as<br />

the Executive Tour continues. For those <strong>of</strong> you<br />

who won’t be able to make it to the remaining<br />

meetings listed below, I hope this summary has<br />

given you a good sense <strong>of</strong> where things currently<br />

stand. If you have any questions, please do not<br />

hesitate to email me at president@ica.bc.ca.<br />

$125,000 – Director <strong>of</strong> Finance<br />

A CA with experience focused in the<br />

manufacturing sector is looking <strong>for</strong> an<br />

opportunity to further their career. This<br />

individual is seeking an opportunity with<br />

a progressive organization where their<br />

contributions will add value to the senior<br />

management team. They bring a strong<br />

skill set in systems, reporting, budgeting<br />

and business development.<br />

$85,000 – Hands-on Controller<br />

A designated individual is looking <strong>for</strong><br />

a position within a small to medium<br />

sized organization where they can be<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> all finance related duties.<br />

They have gained excellent experience<br />

working <strong>for</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> years within<br />

the distribution industry. They have<br />

hands-on experience preparing financial<br />

statements, management reports,<br />

budgeting, cash management, as well<br />

as overseeing accounts payable and<br />

accounts receivable functions.<br />

$85,000 - Public Practice<br />

A CA with 2 years at a management<br />

level is seeking an opportunity where<br />

future Partnership exists. This candidate<br />

articled in a large firm to gain more<br />

exposure in working directly with<br />

clients on review and compilation<br />

engagements. This candidate is seeking<br />

an opportunity with a progressive and<br />

entrepreneurial public practice firm.<br />

$65,000 – Senior Corporate Accountant<br />

A recently designated individual with<br />

experience mainly within the resource<br />

sector is seeking an opportunity to<br />

move into a management role and gain<br />

more supervisory experience. They<br />

have solid experience in all areas <strong>of</strong><br />

full cycle accounting including month<br />

end journal entries, general ledger<br />

reconciliations and financial statement<br />

preparation. They have worked with a<br />

Controller on the budget preparation.<br />

This candidate thrives in a challenging<br />

and fast paced environment.<br />

$45,000 – Intermediate Accountant<br />

An accounting student, who is<br />

motivated to complete their studies and<br />

move <strong>for</strong>ward in their career, has gained<br />

a majority <strong>of</strong> their experience in the<br />

mining sector. They have experience in<br />

preparing balance sheet reconciliations,<br />

recording monthly depreciation,<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> journal entries,<br />

processing <strong>of</strong> journal entries, processing<br />

their hourly payroll and assisting with<br />

month-end preparation.<br />

$40,000 – Accounts Receivable<br />

An Accounts Receivable Clerk with<br />

3 years experience is looking <strong>for</strong> a<br />

position with a stable company that will<br />

provide growth in the future. They are<br />

familiar with all aspects <strong>of</strong> accounts<br />

receivable.<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 7


On the Cover<br />

How is <strong>BC</strong> Faring in a Troubled<br />

Economy?<br />

By Kerri Brkich, Manager <strong>of</strong> Public Affairs<br />

(The following article is based on a report from Chisholm Consulting.)<br />

The year 2008 was tumultuous <strong>for</strong> the<br />

economies <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>, Canada, and the<br />

world. Many jurisdictions, such as<br />

Ontario and the US, were already in the throes<br />

<strong>of</strong> an extended recession when news broke last<br />

fall that the US government was propping up<br />

Bear Stearns. Suddenly, the extent <strong>of</strong> bad debt<br />

on the books <strong>of</strong> major banks and investment<br />

houses became a topic <strong>of</strong> growing concern.<br />

In short order, US mortgage lenders Fannie<br />

Mae and Freddie Mac had to be bailed out, and<br />

Lehman Brothers—a company that had survived<br />

the Great Depression <strong>of</strong> 1929—went bankrupt.<br />

In the end, the US saw 25 banks and credit<br />

unions fail in 2008, compared to only three<br />

failures in 2007, and none in either 2006 or 2005.<br />

The financial carnage that ensued affected the<br />

credit and lending systems <strong>of</strong> every western,<br />

industrialized nation. Lending all but stopped,<br />

and credit streams dried up <strong>for</strong> many businesses<br />

and consumers.<br />

While much has been written about the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> these events on Canada, our interest<br />

in producing this year’s <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up is more<br />

specific: What have these events meant <strong>for</strong> <strong>BC</strong>?<br />

Full <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up available at www.bccheckup.com.<br />

What the <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up reveals<br />

Since the <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chartered</strong> <strong>Accountants</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>BC</strong> began producing the <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up report in<br />

1999, we’ve seen the <strong>economy</strong> go through peaks<br />

and valleys. However, we’ve never seen anything<br />

like the results <strong>of</strong> this year’s edition.<br />

The story <strong>of</strong> 2008 has two very distinct phases:<br />

pre and post-financial crisis. For the most part,<br />

the province held its own <strong>for</strong> the first half <strong>of</strong><br />

2008. Forestry communities stumbled early on,<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> non-existent US housing starts, but<br />

the rest <strong>of</strong> the province continued to tick along,<br />

buoyed by strong retail sales and robust construction<br />

and real estate sectors.<br />

However, as the financial meltdown worsened<br />

in the latter half <strong>of</strong> 2008, <strong>BC</strong>’s economic situation<br />

began to deteriorate rapidly. After years <strong>of</strong><br />

8 ica.bc.ca October ’09


P L A T I N U M M E M B E R<br />

record-low unemployment in <strong>BC</strong>, the third and In addition, we are seeing government debt<br />

fourth quarters <strong>of</strong> 2008 saw the number <strong>of</strong> job balloon to levels not seen since the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

seekers rise steadily. Consumer confidence the decade. In its September Budget Update, the<br />

plunged, retail sales slumped, and the real estate provincial government announced three years <strong>of</strong><br />

market stagnated—particularly in tourist destinations<br />

like the Okanagan and Kootenays. expect to balance the books until at least 2013.<br />

substantial budget deficits and said it does not<br />

In addition, international demand <strong>for</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s That said, other jurisdictions are also planning<br />

export commodities dried up, and workers in to use deficit financing to deliver vital public<br />

the mining and oil and gas industries joined their services and pay <strong>for</strong> fiscal stimulus packages in<br />

<strong>for</strong>estry counterparts in experiencing reduced the next few years. <strong>BC</strong> has an advantage here<br />

shifts and job losses.<br />

over many <strong>of</strong> its competitors: our low rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Many companies that had been scraping by, debt going into the crisis, which will help<br />

especially those in the coastal <strong>for</strong>est industry, cushion the blow to the <strong>BC</strong> government’s bottom<br />

lost access to vital lines <strong>of</strong> credit, and in the latter line.<br />

half <strong>of</strong> 2008, business and consumer bankruptcies The provincial government also recently<br />

began to spike in communities around <strong>BC</strong>. announced that <strong>BC</strong> will move to an HST as <strong>of</strong><br />

As detailed in the <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up, the yearly results<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s live, work, and invest indicators in should provide some welcome relief to a<br />

July 1, 2010. In the short-term, this change<br />

2008 were cushioned by strong first and second beleaguered <strong>economy</strong> and help preserve existing<br />

quarters. The proportion <strong>of</strong> high-technology jobs; in the long-term it should have a positive<br />

jobs in the work<strong>for</strong>ce continued to increase; <strong>BC</strong> impact on both productivity and investment. Of<br />

enjoyed a comparatively low rate <strong>of</strong> government course, the devil, as they say, is in the details,<br />

debt; and real wages and job creation increased and how the provincial government chooses to<br />

at rates above the national average. However, implement this important tax change will<br />

our investment climate lagged behind last year, determine how much <strong>BC</strong> stands to gain from<br />

with declines in productivity, corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its, the benefits inherent in a value-added consumption<br />

tax.<br />

and exports per worker, all <strong>of</strong> which have<br />

declined further in the first half <strong>of</strong> 2009.<br />

While the first half <strong>of</strong> 2009 has been grim,<br />

In 2009, there is no question that <strong>BC</strong> is there are indications that the second half may be<br />

currently battling one <strong>of</strong> the worst recessions in better—or at least, no worse. For example, the<br />

a generation. The employment picture has pace <strong>of</strong> Canadian housing starts picked up in<br />

steadily worsened, and the <strong>economy</strong> has slowed, August, with <strong>BC</strong>’s urban housing starts recording<br />

with most major industrial sectors struggling in a 56% gain over July; and it is expected that this<br />

the face <strong>of</strong> the global recession. Moreover, the positive momentum will be maintained into the<br />

housing market remains fragile in many regions, third quarter. Another example is the optimism<br />

and many <strong>BC</strong> consumers put a hold on major expressed about the <strong>economy</strong> by senior-level<br />

purchases and investments in the first half <strong>of</strong> the CAs in response to a recent survey: The measure<br />

09.OBRTurnbullAd1 9/21/09 9:45 AM Page 1<br />

year.<br />

was up to 28%—a huge increase from the low <strong>of</strong><br />

4% recorded in the first quarter <strong>of</strong> the year, and<br />

the even lower 2% recorded in the fourth quarter<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2008. 1<br />

Many economists are predicting that <strong>BC</strong>’s<br />

<strong>economy</strong> will improve in late 2009 and in 2010,<br />

due to spending on public infrastructure, the<br />

stimulus from the 2010 Winter Olympics, and<br />

recovering consumer confidence. However, in<br />

order <strong>for</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s <strong>economy</strong> to experience significant<br />

recovery and growth, global markets and commodities<br />

prices will have to rebound. Until this<br />

happens, recovery will be slow at best.<br />

In the meantime, here’s a closer look at the data.<br />

1<br />

CICA/R<strong>BC</strong> Business Monitor (Q2 2009).<br />

Protect it. Grow it.<br />

In That Order<br />

Ross Turnbull, CA, CBV, CFA<br />

Director, Portfolio Manager<br />

Average Monthly Per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

(Dec/94-Sept/09)<br />

3.6%<br />

4.1%<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance Since Inception<br />

(Dec/94-Sept/09)<br />

777%<br />

Tel 604 844 5363<br />

Toll Free 1 888 886 3586<br />

rturnbull@odlumbrown.com<br />

up months<br />

(59% <strong>of</strong> time)<br />

down months<br />

(41% <strong>of</strong> time)<br />

276%<br />

odlumbrown.com<br />

trust • vision • investment integrity<br />

*The Model is an all-equity portfolio established by the Research Department in December 1994, with a<br />

hypothetical investment <strong>of</strong> $250,000. The Model provides a basis with which to measure the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

our advice and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> our disciplined investment strategy. Trades are made using the<br />

closing price on the day a change is announced. These are gross figures be<strong>for</strong>e fees. Past per<strong>for</strong>mance is<br />

not indicative <strong>of</strong> future per<strong>for</strong>mance. MEMBER CIPF<br />

-1.9%<br />

-3.8%<br />

ob model portfolio*<br />

s&p/tsx total return index<br />

Portfolio measurements and comparisons are done at mid-month and not month end.<br />

ob model<br />

portfolio*<br />

s&p/tsx total<br />

return index<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 9


live<br />

<strong>BC</strong> saw some improvement as a place to LIVE in 2008. For the tenth year in a row, <strong>BC</strong> led the comparison jurisdictions<br />

in both reducing the number <strong>of</strong> youth at risk (-1 ppt) and absolute levels (8%).<br />

In addition, the province’s personal disposable income growth rate (2.9%) ranked second in our comparison and was<br />

ahead <strong>of</strong> the national average (2.4%) last year. In 2008, <strong>BC</strong>’s debt-to personal disposable income ratio was down slightly<br />

(-0.8%), and shelter costs were up only 0.4 ppt, due to shelter and other expenses rising at roughly the same rate.<br />

Increased wages and lower debt will positively impact British Columbians’ standard <strong>of</strong> living. However, <strong>BC</strong>’s health care<br />

spending ranked last among our comparison jurisdictions, although, its health care delivery system was rated as second<br />

best among all Canadian provinces. The table below shows how <strong>BC</strong> compared with Alberta, Ontario, and the national<br />

average on our five key indicators over one and five-year periods.<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> LIVE Key Indicators * <strong>BC</strong> AB ON CAN<br />

Real Personal Disposable Income per Capita $28,616 $37,189 $28,847 $28,591<br />

Debt to Personal Disposable Income 1.28 0.84 0.97 0.92<br />

Shelter Costs as % <strong>of</strong> Total Household Expenditures 20.7% 17.4% 21.3% 19.5%<br />

Youth at Risk 8.0% 12.5% 9.8% 10.9%<br />

2008 Value<br />

health<br />

Health Expenditures per Capita $2,894 $3,149 $2,964 $3,016<br />

Health Consumer Index National Ranking in 2008** 2 nd 5 th 1 st n/a<br />

Real Personal Disposable Income per Capita 2.9% 3.5% 1.7% 2.4%<br />

Debt to Personal Disposable Income -0.8% -1.2% -4.0% -2.1%<br />

Shelter Costs as % <strong>of</strong> Total Household Expenditures 0.4 ppt*** 0.2 ppt 0.6 ppt 0.3 ppt<br />

Youth at Risk -1.0 ppt 0.1 ppt 0.0 ppt -0.3 ppt<br />

health<br />

Health Expenditures per Capita 1.1% -3.3% 4.8% 2.5%<br />

Health Consumer Index National Ranking in 2008 n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

2007-08 % Change<br />

Real Personal Disposable Income per Capita 17.3% 24.0% 8.9% 13.1%<br />

Debt to Personal Disposable Income 17.4% 15.1% 7.8% 10.8%<br />

Shelter Costs as % <strong>of</strong> Total Household Expenditures 0.1 ppt -1.0 ppt 0.9 ppt 0.5 ppt<br />

Youth at Risk -1.4 ppt -1.2 ppt -3.1 ppt -1.6ppt<br />

health<br />

Health Expenditures per Capita -3.2% 6.9% 29.3% 15.6%<br />

Health Consumer Index National Ranking in 2008 n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

2003-08 % Change<br />

* Improvements in quality <strong>of</strong> life are indicated by increases in real disposable income per capita and per capita health care expenditures,<br />

and decreases in debt/personal disposable income, cost <strong>of</strong> living, and youth at risk.<br />

** This is how <strong>BC</strong> ranked among all Canadian provinces.<br />

*** ppt = percentage point.<br />

10 ica.bc.ca October ’09


live<br />

Combined, our five “live” indicators provide a measure <strong>of</strong> British Columbia’s social well-being and standard <strong>of</strong> living. Understandably, each indicator is interconnected:<br />

Access to education and quality health care leads to a more stable and productive work<strong>for</strong>ce; this, in turn, drives up personal disposable<br />

incomes. And higher disposable incomes are key to managing mortgage debt, especially in <strong>BC</strong>, which has one <strong>of</strong> the most expensive real estate markets in<br />

Canada.<br />

So how did <strong>BC</strong>’s live indicators fare in 2008?<br />

Youth education and employment<br />

<strong>BC</strong> continues to lead the country in high school completion rates. In 2008, 8% <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong> youth did not graduate from high school, compared to 9.8% in<br />

Ontario, 12.5% in Alberta, and a national average <strong>of</strong> 10.9%. In fact, since 2002, <strong>BC</strong> has had the lowest percentage <strong>of</strong> “youth at risk” in our comparison.<br />

Youth at risk are defined as the percentage <strong>of</strong> the labour <strong>for</strong>ce, aged 19 to 24, who have not completed high school.<br />

Youth unemployment in <strong>BC</strong> was at its lowest (6.9%) in March 2008, when jobs in construction, manufacturing, and trade were plentiful. By March 2009,<br />

however, youth unemployment had reached 13.5%, the highest it had been in nearly five years. 2,3 However, despite the challenges it presents <strong>for</strong> young jobseekers,<br />

the current global recession may provide an increased incentive <strong>for</strong> <strong>BC</strong> youth to remain in school, creating a better chance <strong>for</strong> a prosperous future.<br />

Provincial health care expenditures<br />

In addition to being a leader among the comparison jurisdictions in terms <strong>of</strong> high school completion, <strong>BC</strong> also scored well when looking at the “bang <strong>for</strong> buck”<br />

<strong>of</strong> provincial health care expenditures. In 2008, <strong>BC</strong>’s real health care expenditures per capita rose by 1.1%, to $2,894—the lowest amount <strong>of</strong> health care<br />

spending in our comparison by $70 per capita. However, a comparison <strong>of</strong> the Health Consumer Index rankings—an indicator we’re introducing in this<br />

edition <strong>of</strong> the Check-Up—shows that <strong>BC</strong> placed highly among all Canadian provinces in terms <strong>of</strong> health care delivery last year—second only to Ontario.<br />

The Health Consumer Index evaluates provincial health care delivery based on five criteria: outcomes, waiting times <strong>for</strong> treatment, primary care, patient<br />

rights, and “generosity.” 4 The idea <strong>of</strong> a consumer-based assessment <strong>of</strong> health care is new to Canada, but <strong>of</strong>fers a fresh and rigorous way <strong>of</strong> measuring success,<br />

both within Canada and internationally. Combining this new indicator with our traditional one (real provincial health care expenditures per capita) provides<br />

a balanced approach to evaluating our province’s standing in terms <strong>of</strong> health care.<br />

Although <strong>BC</strong> has one <strong>of</strong> the lowest expenditures per capita <strong>of</strong> all the comparison jurisdictions, it obtained a high Index value in 2008—in fact, the second<br />

highest <strong>of</strong> all the provinces. Consequently, <strong>BC</strong> had one <strong>of</strong> the highest “bang <strong>for</strong> buck” ratios <strong>of</strong> all the provinces last year.<br />

Personal disposable income<br />

Just as health and education are important indicators <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s social well-being, personal disposable income, or “take home pay adjusted <strong>for</strong> inflation,” 5 is an<br />

important indicator <strong>of</strong> economic well-being.<br />

In 2008, <strong>BC</strong>’s real personal disposable income rose by 2.9%; this was the second highest increase after Alberta (3.5%), ranking ahead <strong>of</strong> Ontario and the<br />

national average (1.7% and 2.4% respectively). Between 2003 and 2008, <strong>BC</strong>’s real personal disposable income grew by 17.3%; once again, this was second<br />

to Alberta (24%) and ahead <strong>of</strong> Ontario and the national average (8.9% and 13.1% respectively).<br />

These gains were crucial to raising <strong>BC</strong>’s standard <strong>of</strong> living, as <strong>BC</strong>’s absolute disposable income levels have consistently lagged those <strong>of</strong> the comparison<br />

jurisdictions and the national average. In fact, 2008 marked the first time in the last five years that the disposable incomes <strong>of</strong> British Columbians (averaging<br />

$28,616) surpassed the national average ($28,591).<br />

While <strong>BC</strong> has seen this indicator improve over one-year and five-year periods, wages and salaries in some cornerstone industries began to drop in 2009.<br />

When comparing the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2009 to the same period in 2008, wages and salaries in goods-producing industries decreased by 7.7%, with the biggest<br />

decreases occurring in agriculture, <strong>for</strong>estry, fishing and hunting (-19%) and manufacturing (-12.8%). Services-producing industries saw wages and salaries<br />

rise by 2.3%, but this slight increase was mainly due to increases in public sector administration jobs, not in private sector jobs.<br />

Improving wages is crucial to mitigating British Columbians’ financial vulnerability. Over the past decade, <strong>BC</strong> has sustained the highest personal disposable<br />

debt-to-income ratio in our comparison. In 2008, <strong>BC</strong>’s ratio was 1.28, compared to 0.84 in Alberta, 0.97 in Ontario, and a national average <strong>of</strong> 0.92.<br />

While our province’s personal debt-to-disposable income ratio declined by 0.8% in 2008, this was the weakest one-year result in our comparison: Alberta’s<br />

ratio declined by 1.2%, the national average declined by 2.1%, and Ontario’s ratio declined by 4%.<br />

2<br />

<strong>BC</strong> Stats, Labour Force Survey, March 2009.<br />

3<br />

In the <strong>BC</strong> Check Up report, we compare both one and five-year trends. Where possible, we also identify important longer-term trends that will shape<br />

our future.<br />

4<br />

“Generosity” refers to the range <strong>of</strong> services provided in each province. The methodology was developed and used by the Health Consumer Powerhouse,<br />

Europe’s leading independent provider <strong>of</strong> consumer in<strong>for</strong>mation. The work <strong>of</strong> the Health Consumer Powerhouse has initiated improvement in healthcare<br />

systems in Europe.<br />

5<br />

Take-home pay is the income left over after deductions <strong>for</strong> taxes, social insurance, and other fees. Statistics Canada, May 2007.<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 11


Housing and shelter<br />

In 2008, mortgage debt in <strong>BC</strong> represented<br />

roughly 70% <strong>of</strong> total consumer debt—hardly<br />

surprising given that average real housing prices<br />

in <strong>BC</strong> were at least $100,000 greater than prices<br />

in Alberta and Ontario. But while our province<br />

continues to lag in this indicator, <strong>BC</strong> consumers<br />

appear to be holding their own. Despite expensive<br />

real estate prices, British Columbia has<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the lowest mortgage arrears rates and<br />

personal bankruptcy rates in the country. 6<br />

This is more important than ever, especially<br />

when looking at the shelter share <strong>of</strong> total household<br />

expenditures 7 (shelter share), which reflects<br />

the cost <strong>of</strong> living. In 2007, shelter accounted <strong>for</strong><br />

20.7%, or one fifth, <strong>of</strong> total household expenditures<br />

in <strong>BC</strong>. Only Ontario exceeded this<br />

percentage, with 21.3%.<br />

In 2007, <strong>BC</strong>’s housing prices rose and vacancy<br />

rates declined, causing the shelter share indicator<br />

to increase by 0.4 percentage points (ppt), the<br />

first significant gain in several years. Only<br />

Ontario saw its shelter share grow more quickly,<br />

increasing by 0.6 ppt. For British Columbians<br />

whose incomes did not rise at the same rate as<br />

the cost <strong>of</strong> shelter, this increase in shelter share<br />

represented a decline in standard <strong>of</strong> living, as<br />

more income was diverted to housing.<br />

dap_beyondnumbers_sep09.eps 9/9/2009 1:56:57 PM<br />

Shelter Cost as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> Total Household<br />

Expenditure, Provinces and Canada, 2003 to 2007<br />

22<br />

21<br />

20<br />

19<br />

18<br />

17<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

<strong>BC</strong> 20.6% 20.2% 20.4% 20.3% 20.7%<br />

AB 18.4% 18.6% 17.4% 17.2% 17.4%<br />

ON 20.4% 20.6% 19.9% 20.7% 21.3%<br />

CDN Average 19.0% 19.2% 18.9% 19.2% 19.5%<br />

Source: Statistics Canada<br />

Between 2003 and 2007, <strong>BC</strong> saw only a slight<br />

increase in this indicator (0.1 ppt), as shelter and<br />

other nominal household expenditures rose at<br />

similar, and rapid, rates.<br />

Overall<br />

Our live indicators will face challenges in 2009.<br />

While health care and education should remain<br />

constant or improve, wages will likely decrease,<br />

negatively affecting the debt to disposable income<br />

ratio and shelter share <strong>of</strong> household<br />

expenditures.<br />

6<br />

CI<strong>BC</strong>, Household Credit Analysis, March<br />

2009.<br />

7<br />

Household expenditure includes total current<br />

consumption, personal taxes, personal<br />

insurance payments and pension<br />

contributions, and gifts <strong>of</strong> money and<br />

contributions. Shelter costs include<br />

expenditures on principal accommodation<br />

(either owned or rented) and on other<br />

accommodation, such as vacation homes or<br />

accommodation while travelling. Expenditure<br />

on owned principal accommodation includes<br />

regular mortgage payments, if any.<br />

12 ica.bc.ca October ’09


work<br />

<strong>BC</strong> saw improvement in three <strong>of</strong> the five WORK indicators in 2008, and tied <strong>for</strong> first among the comparison<br />

jurisdictions <strong>for</strong> growth in educational attainment (1 ppt), and ranked second in real wage growth (1.3%) and job<br />

creation (2.1%).<br />

Pay equality declined by 1.2% last year, and the unemployment rate increased by 0.4 ppt. It could be argued—from<br />

the perspective <strong>of</strong> employers—that the increase in the unemployment rate was desirable, as the previous record-low<br />

unemployment levels caused shortages <strong>of</strong> workers in some industries over the last two to three years. However, the<br />

unemployment rate has surged in 2009, indicating <strong>BC</strong>’s <strong>economy</strong> is feeling the brunt <strong>of</strong> the recession.<br />

The table below shows how <strong>BC</strong> compared with Alberta, Ontario, and the national average on our five key indicators<br />

over one and five-year periods.<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> WORK Key Indicators* <strong>BC</strong> AB ON CAN<br />

Educational Attainment 62.7% 62.3% 67.5% 65.6%<br />

Unemployment Rate 4.6% 3.6% 6.5% 6.1%<br />

Real Wage Rate $23.43 $26.32 $23.94 $23.52<br />

Female/Male Wage Ratio 0.827 0.790 0.837 0.838<br />

2008 Value<br />

Job Creation 48,000 53,900 93,500 259,400<br />

Educational Attainment 1.0 ppt** 0.8 ppt 1.0 ppt 0.7 ppt<br />

Unemployment Rate 0.4 ppt 0.1 ppt 0.1 ppt 0.1 ppt<br />

Real Wage Rate 1.3% 3.1% 0.3% 0.8%<br />

Female/Male Wage Ratio -1.2% 0.3% 0.1% -0.2%<br />

Job Creation 2.1% 2.8% 1.4% 1.5%<br />

2007-08 % Change<br />

Educational Attainment 3.8 ppt 3.4 ppt 5.6 ppt 4.6 ppt<br />

Unemployment Rate -3.4 ppt -1.5 ppt -0.4 ppt -1.5 ppt<br />

Real Wage Rate 5.2% 8.6% 4.1% 5.6%<br />

Female/Male Wage Ratio -1.5% 1.8% 2.4% 1.8%<br />

Job Creation 14.9% 17.3% 7.6% 9.3%<br />

2003-08 % Change<br />

* A positive increase in the value <strong>of</strong> these indicators (except <strong>for</strong> unemployment levels where a decrease indicates improvement)<br />

means an improvement in the quality <strong>of</strong> the province’s work environment.<br />

** ppt = percentage point.<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 13


work<br />

Overall, <strong>BC</strong>’s job creation level and real wages increased at rates above the national average in 2008, and educational attainment levels increased at the fastest<br />

pace in years. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, while many <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s work indicators improved last year, unemployment increased and pay equality deteriorated. The global<br />

economic slowdown began to affect work indicators late in 2008, and many work indicators have not been faring well in 2009.<br />

Our work indicators give an overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s domestic <strong>economy</strong>: Job gains and losses directly affect the unemployment rate, pay equity, and real wages;<br />

and the level <strong>of</strong> educational attainment in the work<strong>for</strong>ce can dictate how quickly an <strong>economy</strong> rebounds from a downturn, as a highly educated work<strong>for</strong>ce will<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten translate into higher productivity levels.<br />

Job creation and loss<br />

The most important indicator <strong>for</strong> an <strong>economy</strong>’s overall health is job creation or loss, which measures the absolute change in the number <strong>of</strong> employed workers,<br />

and shows where new opportunities or losses have occurred in the various sectors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>economy</strong>.<br />

<strong>BC</strong>’s <strong>economy</strong> created 48,000 new jobs in 2008, an increase <strong>of</strong> 2.1%, which was well above the national job growth rate <strong>of</strong> 1.5%, and Ontario’s increase<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1.4%. However, this was down from the 60,000 - 70,000 new jobs created over the last three years. By comparison, Alberta’s job creation was up by 2.8%<br />

in 2008, following its huge 80,000+ job creation pace in 2006 and 2007. Between 2003 and 2008, almost 300,000 jobs have been created in <strong>BC</strong>, signifying<br />

a total employment growth rate <strong>of</strong> 14.9%. Over this same period, Alberta created an almost identical number <strong>of</strong> jobs—296,600—which represented employment<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> 17.3%. Interestingly, <strong>BC</strong> and Alberta generated over 40% <strong>of</strong> the new jobs in Canada between 2003 and 2008, despite representing only 25%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the total Canadian population.<br />

While <strong>BC</strong> enjoyed one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing economies in Canada in the past few years, the downturn has hit hard. Compared with 2008, the first seven<br />

months <strong>of</strong> 2009 have signalled job losses in both the goods and services-producing sectors, as the number <strong>of</strong> jobs in <strong>BC</strong>’s <strong>economy</strong> dropped by 2.6%.<br />

Overall, the goods-producing sector saw jobs drop by 10.5%, as economic staples such as agriculture (-6.2%); <strong>for</strong>estry, fishing, mining, oil and gas (-9.2%);<br />

utilities (-11.6%), construction (-9.9%); and manufacturing (-11.6%) all took significant hits. Services-producing sectors faired better, but were still down<br />

by 0.4%. While some sectors such as health care and social assistance (7.5%); trade (1.4%); and in<strong>for</strong>mation, culture, and recreation (0.9%) saw job growth,<br />

all other services-producing sectors saw declines. Those with the worst number <strong>of</strong> losses included transportation and warehousing (-10%); business, building<br />

and other support services (-4.3%); and finance, insurance, real estate and leasing (-3.7%).<br />

Unemployment<br />

It should come as no surprise that the unemployment rate, which measures the number <strong>of</strong> unemployed persons as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the population, aged 15<br />

and older, who are employed or actively looking <strong>for</strong> work, has been rising steadily over the past ten months. <strong>BC</strong>’s record-low unemployment rate <strong>of</strong> 4.2% in<br />

2007 rose to 4.6% in 2008—still far below the unemployment rates in Ontario and Canada (6.5 % and 6.1% respectively). 8<br />

Between 2003 and 2008, <strong>BC</strong>’s unemployment rate dropped by a whopping 3.4 percentage points (ppt). This was more than double the Canadian average<br />

(-1.5 ppt) and more than eight times the progress made in Ontario (-0.4 ppt). 9 However, unemployment has risen continuously in 2009, reflecting the growing<br />

challenges <strong>of</strong> the <strong>BC</strong> <strong>economy</strong>. By August 2009, <strong>BC</strong>’s unemployment rate was 8%, which is back up to levels seen at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the decade. It was<br />

highest in the resource-dependent Cariboo (13.3%), and lowest in the more economically diverse Vancouver Island/Coast (6.6%).<br />

Wages<br />

A slowing job market and higher unemployment levels may put downward pressure on wages in many industries. As our province has continually lagged<br />

behind our comparison jurisdictions in real wages <strong>for</strong> the last five years, closing the wage gap will continue to be a significant problem. In 2008, real wages<br />

in <strong>BC</strong> were $23.43 per hour, which was the lowest in our comparison. That said, <strong>BC</strong>’s one-year wage growth <strong>of</strong> 1.3% in 2008 was higher than average and<br />

narrowed the wage gap with Ontario.<br />

Alberta pulled ahead <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong> in 2008, with a real wage gain <strong>of</strong> 3.1%, as lower costs <strong>for</strong> shelter and gasoline helped tame the high levels <strong>of</strong> inflation that had<br />

nullified Alberta’s wage gains in 2007. 10,11<br />

Between 2003 and 2008, Alberta saw an 8.6% increase in real wages, compared to <strong>BC</strong>’s growth rate <strong>of</strong> 5.2%, and Ontario’s increase <strong>of</strong> 4.1%. <strong>BC</strong>’s gains<br />

lagged behind the national average (5.6%) during this same period.<br />

<strong>BC</strong>’s mining and oil and gas industries continued to have the highest wages, which increased by 9% in 2008 to an average <strong>of</strong> $44.73/hour. 12 Other top<br />

earners were workers in utilities ($40.51/hr); in<strong>for</strong>mation & cultural industries ($32.76/hr); pr<strong>of</strong>essional, scientific and technical services ($32.60/hr); and<br />

public administration ($32.30/hr). However, as there have been job losses in many <strong>of</strong> these sectors, it is likely that wage rates in these sectors may also drop<br />

over time and be reflected in next year’s results.<br />

As most <strong>of</strong> the wage gains and higher wage positions were in male-dominated fields, it is not surprising that <strong>BC</strong>’s female-to-male wage ratio declined by<br />

1.2% in 2008, down to 0.827. By comparison, the national average declined by 0.2%, while Alberta and Ontario both realized small gains (0.3% and 0.1%<br />

respectively).<br />

8<br />

Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, 2008.<br />

9<br />

Ibid.<br />

10<br />

Statistics Canada, Survey <strong>of</strong> Employment, Payrolls, and Hours and Consumer Price Index, 2008.<br />

11<br />

Alberta Finance & Enterprise, Economics and Statistics – Alberta Inflation, June 13, 2008.<br />

12<br />

Statistics Canada, Survey <strong>of</strong> Employment, Payrolls, and Hours and Consumer Price Index, 2008.<br />

14 ica.bc.ca October ’09


<strong>BC</strong> was the only jurisdiction to see a decline in<br />

wage parity between 2003 and 2008, with its ratio<br />

declining by 1.5%. During this same period,<br />

Ontario’s wage parity ratio rose by 2.4%, and<br />

Alberta and Canada both saw an increase <strong>of</strong><br />

1.8%.<br />

From the late 1990s to about 2004, our<br />

comparison jurisdictions experienced improvements<br />

in wage parity, most likely due to the<br />

increased number <strong>of</strong> women who obtained a<br />

post-secondary education throughout the<br />

1990s. 13 In <strong>BC</strong>, wage parity slowed because the<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> women in management declined<br />

from 38% in 1998 to 34.1% in 2008. 14 There<br />

was also a corresponding reduction in the share<br />

<strong>of</strong> high-wage jobs held by women. Another<br />

factor to consider is that although women’s<br />

nominal wages in <strong>BC</strong> rose by 11.9% between<br />

2003 and 2008, men’s rose by 13.6% during the<br />

same period.<br />

While <strong>BC</strong>’s wage parity lost ground in 2008,<br />

the preliminary results from 2009 show a slight<br />

rebound, no doubt due to massive job losses in<br />

male-dominated resource industries. When<br />

comparing the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2009 with that<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2008, pay equity was 0.5% higher; when<br />

looking at the second quarter results <strong>for</strong> both<br />

periods, the 2009 rate was 2.1% higher.<br />

Real Average Hourly Wages (2008$), Provinces<br />

and Canada, 2003 to 2008<br />

27<br />

26<br />

25<br />

24<br />

23<br />

22<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

<strong>BC</strong> $22.28 $22.40 $22.52 $22.80 $23.12 $23.43<br />

AB $24.24 $24.75 $25.19 $25.45 $25.54 $26.32<br />

ON $22.99 $23.25 $23.40 $23.51 $23.87 $23.94<br />

CDN Average $22.28 $22.57 $22.74 $22.92 $23.33 $23.52<br />

Source: Statistics Canada, Survey <strong>of</strong> Employment, Payrolls and Hours and<br />

Consumer Price Index<br />

Educational attainment<br />

Just as the number <strong>of</strong> jobs, the unemployment rate, and wage levels are key indicators <strong>of</strong> the health <strong>of</strong> our domestic <strong>economy</strong>, the level <strong>of</strong> educational attainment<br />

is a predictor <strong>of</strong> labour productivity and competitiveness.<br />

Educational attainment measures the percentage <strong>of</strong> the labour <strong>for</strong>ce, aged 25 to 54, that has received some level <strong>of</strong> post-secondary education. 15 In 2008, the<br />

educational attainment <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s labour <strong>for</strong>ce rose by 1 ppt, reaching 62.7%. 16 While this is the highest level <strong>of</strong> education <strong>BC</strong>’s labour <strong>for</strong>ce has ever achieved,<br />

it was still lower than Ontario’s level and the national average (67.5% and 65.6% respectively).<br />

Notwithstanding their current rankings among the comparison jurisdictions, <strong>BC</strong> and Alberta are seeing faster growth in educational attainment, and they<br />

are likely to catch up to Eastern Canada in the coming years. This is not only due to improved graduation rates and greater post-secondary participation, but<br />

also due to an influx <strong>of</strong> highly skilled workers. Between 2007 and 2008, the number <strong>of</strong> workers with education above a bachelor’s degree rose by 15.8% in<br />

<strong>BC</strong> and 11.1% in Alberta—well above growth rates in Ontario and Canada (7.9% and 7% respectively).<br />

Considering <strong>BC</strong>’s dismal results in labour productivity, gains in educational attainment are likely key to improving our overall productivity and economic<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Overall<br />

While <strong>BC</strong>’s work environment fared relatively well in 2008, it has already faced a myriad <strong>of</strong> challenges in 2009. In addition, a weak investment climate may<br />

hinder the pace <strong>of</strong> our eventual economic recovery.<br />

13<br />

Marc Frenette and Simon Coulombe, Has Higher Education Among young Women Substantially Reduced the Gender Gap in Employment and Earnings?<br />

Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series, June 2007.<br />

14<br />

Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, 2008.<br />

15<br />

Includes post-secondary certificate, diploma, or higher, which includes diploma programs at colleges, as well as trades and technical certification programs.<br />

16<br />

Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, 2008.<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 15


invest<br />

<strong>BC</strong>’s investment climate continued to see lacklustre results in 2008, ranking lowest or second-lowest in three out <strong>of</strong><br />

five indicators. This is not a surprise, given that <strong>BC</strong>’s real GDP declined 0.3%, and was below the national average<br />

growth rate <strong>of</strong> 0.5%.<br />

In 2008, the value <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s exports declined by 9.1%, due primarily to the slump in US demand <strong>for</strong> solid wood products,<br />

and lower mineral and gas prices. <strong>BC</strong>’s labour productivity declined by 1.7% and corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its declined by 0.3 ppt.<br />

On the bright side, <strong>BC</strong> tied <strong>for</strong> first in employment in the sciences, posting a 0.2 ppt increase. In addition, <strong>BC</strong>’s<br />

financial liabilities/GDP declined 2 ppt, the best result in our comparison.<br />

The table below shows how <strong>BC</strong> compared with Alberta, Ontario, and the national average on our five key indicators<br />

over one and five-year periods.<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> INVEST Key Indicators <strong>BC</strong> AB ON CAN<br />

Productivity 38.0 47.5 41.7 40.9<br />

Employment in the Sciences 6.6% 7.6% 7.6% 7.1%<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> Exports per Worker $27,915 $51,881 $46,135 $26,548<br />

Net Provincial Financial Liabilities<br />

as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP*<br />

6.9% -6.4% 21.4% 20.8%<br />

2008 Value<br />

After-Tax Corporate Pr<strong>of</strong>its-to-GDP Ratio 9.34% 18.79% 7.27% 10.80%<br />

Productivity -1.7% -1.4% -0.6% -0.5%<br />

Employment in the Sciences 0.2 ppt** -0.3 ppt 0.2 ppt 0.1 ppt<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> Exports per Worker -9.1% -4.2% -6.7% -6.3%<br />

Net Provincial Financial Liabilities<br />

as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

-2.0 ppt -1.5 ppt -1.1 ppt -1.7 ppt<br />

After-Tax Corporate Pr<strong>of</strong>its-to-GDP Ratio -0.3 ppt 2.1 ppt -1.0 ppt 0.2 ppt<br />

2007-08 % Change<br />

Productivity -0.6% 2.5% 3.4% 3.3%<br />

Employment in the Sciences 0.3 ppt 0.7 ppt 0.4 ppt 0.5 ppt<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> Exports per Worker -4.3% -0.8% -4.5% -3.9%<br />

Net Provincial Financial Liabilities<br />

as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

-7.1 ppt -7.3 ppt -2.7 ppt -6.6 ppt<br />

After-Tax Corporate Pr<strong>of</strong>its-to-GDP Ratio 2.3 ppt 2.2 ppt -2.1 ppt 1.1 ppt<br />

2003-08 % Change<br />

* Net provincial financial liabilities as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP — 2007 value presented and % changes from 2003 to 2007 and 2006 to<br />

2007. An increase in all <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>egoing indicators except net financial liabilities is a desirable change in terms <strong>of</strong> investment conditions.<br />

Conversely, a decline in government net financial liabilities to GDP ratio is a desirable change.<br />

** ppt = percentage point.


invest<br />

A vibrant investment climate is the key to raising <strong>BC</strong>’s standard <strong>of</strong> living. High productivity and exports per worker positively affect corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its, encouraging<br />

investment and leading to higher wages <strong>for</strong> workers. Greater corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its and higher wages affect government revenue, and government<br />

surpluses present an opportunity to pay down debt. All <strong>of</strong> these factors help to create a competitive, vibrant <strong>economy</strong> that attracts educated workers; and,<br />

again, educated workers have a positive impact on productivity.<br />

Productivity<br />

Productivity is crucial to long-term economic growth. Real labour productivity measures the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the work<strong>for</strong>ce, or the amount <strong>of</strong> output per personhour<br />

worked. 17 In 2008, <strong>BC</strong>’s productivity declined by 1.7% and Alberta’s by 1.4%, while Ontario and Canada as a whole saw declines <strong>of</strong> 0.6% and 0.5%<br />

respectively.<br />

Between 2003 and 2008, <strong>BC</strong>’s productivity declined by 0.6%. Productivity was dampened by the service sector, which plays a large role in the <strong>economy</strong><br />

and is more labour-intensive than the goods sector. (Productivity growth in most <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s service industries has actually been weak since 1990.) Another<br />

factor is the low educational attainment <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s labour <strong>for</strong>ce. Without investment in “human capital,” labour simply cannot achieve its full potential.<br />

Since 2001, <strong>BC</strong> has made some tentative steps towards improving productivity, mainly through government investment in public infrastructure and tax<br />

changes. However, the economic downturn reveals the tenuousness <strong>of</strong> our foothold on prosperity, and underscores the amount <strong>of</strong> work that still needs to be<br />

done.<br />

After <strong>BC</strong> moves to an HST, businesses will save nearly $2 billion in production costs and $150 million in tax compliance costs. In the short-term, these<br />

savings should buoy the <strong>economy</strong>. In the long-term, these savings will lead to greater capital investment and will improve the productivity gap, as businesses<br />

invest in new machinery, new technology, and improved training <strong>for</strong> workers.<br />

To boost <strong>BC</strong>’s productivity growth, we need ongoing investment in private and public infrastructure, in technological innovation and dissemination, and<br />

in the education and training <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s labour <strong>for</strong>ce.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

Low productivity directly affects corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its, and corporate pr<strong>of</strong>itability is a strong indicator <strong>of</strong> a province’s current and future investment climate. 18<br />

In 2008, <strong>BC</strong>’s ratio <strong>of</strong> after-tax corporate pr<strong>of</strong>its declined by 0.3 percentage points (ppt) to 9.34%. Ontario declined even further, with a 1 ppt drop to<br />

7.27%. The national average increased by a meagre 0.2 ppt to 10.80%, and Alberta saw this indicator rise by 2.1 ppt to 18.79%, due to oil and gas revenues.<br />

In 2008, Canadian corporations saw pr<strong>of</strong>its begin to decline as the world financial system and markets stalled. Canadian pre-tax operating pr<strong>of</strong>its declined<br />

from $68.3 billion in the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2008, to $62.4 billion in the fourth quarter <strong>of</strong> the same year. Between the first quarter <strong>of</strong> 2008 and the first quarter<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2009, Canadian industry pre-tax operating pr<strong>of</strong>its declined by 19.3%, or $13.2 billion. However, some <strong>of</strong> the gross pr<strong>of</strong>it losses were <strong>of</strong>fset by declining<br />

provincial and federal general corporate tax rates in 2008.<br />

In <strong>BC</strong>, many corporate pr<strong>of</strong>it losses occurred in the resource sector, reflecting the decline in quantity and price <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>est products shipments, our major<br />

export. Export revenue is a significant source <strong>of</strong> basic income into our provincial <strong>economy</strong>, but it is sensitive to global demand conditions.<br />

Exports per worker<br />

An increase in the exports per worker value reflects an improvement in the trade environment and investment climate. In 2008, <strong>BC</strong>’s exports per worker<br />

value declined by 6.8% to $27,915, and Ontario’s declined by 6.7% to $46,135. Although the value <strong>of</strong> Alberta’s exports per worker declined by 4.2% to<br />

$51,881 last year, it was still almost double that <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong> and ranked as the highest value in Canada. 19<br />

Between 2003 and 2008, the value <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s exports per worker was down by 4.3%. During this same period, Ontario saw a decline <strong>of</strong> 4.5%, and Alberta<br />

saw a decline <strong>of</strong> 0.8%. While the value <strong>of</strong> total exports from <strong>BC</strong> rose by 5.9% between 2003 and 2008, the number <strong>of</strong> workers increased at almost double<br />

this rate (10.7%). In the first five months <strong>of</strong> 2009, the value <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s domestic exports per worker was down by 17.8%.<br />

Workers in the sciences sector<br />

The labour market share <strong>of</strong> workers in the natural and applied sciences is a barometer <strong>of</strong> technological dissemination throughout the work<strong>for</strong>ce. 20 In 2008,<br />

Alberta and Ontario led the comparison jurisdictions with 7.6% <strong>of</strong> the labour <strong>for</strong>ce employed in science-related occupations, while the national average was<br />

7.1%. <strong>BC</strong> lagged behind, with 6.6%.<br />

17<br />

Ideally, a productivity measure should account <strong>for</strong> both labour and capital inputs used in production; however, labour productivity is generally used as a<br />

proxy measure <strong>for</strong> total change in productivity.<br />

18<br />

Our indicator is the ratio <strong>of</strong> after-tax operating pr<strong>of</strong>its to GDP, which allows us to compare jurisdictions. Our definition <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its includes those accrued<br />

in both private sector and government business enterprises. Government business enterprises (GBEs), which constitute 5-10% <strong>of</strong> total pr<strong>of</strong>its, are legal<br />

entities with a separate set <strong>of</strong> financial statements, which qualifies them in the parlance <strong>of</strong> Statistics Canada as “institutional units.” GBEs differ from<br />

other government services in that they generally charge prices that are related to the cost <strong>of</strong> production, as in the case in private enterprises, and are<br />

subject to tax. Gaming and liquor sales are excluded from GBE pr<strong>of</strong>its because <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> their pr<strong>of</strong>its. Governments have established monopolies<br />

<strong>for</strong> these enterprises, and it is impossible to distinguish between pr<strong>of</strong>its earned as a margin on their operations or earned as monopoly producers. They<br />

are, there<strong>for</strong>e, classified as indirect taxes—specifically, taxes on products.<br />

19<br />

The value <strong>of</strong> Canadian exports per worker was $26,548 in 2008, but as this figure nets out inter-provincial shipments, and it is not comparable to the<br />

provinces’ values.<br />

20<br />

Natural and applied sciences include pr<strong>of</strong>essional occupations in physical and life sciences, engineering, architecture, planning, and a range <strong>of</strong> related<br />

technical occupations.<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 17


Not only was <strong>BC</strong>’s percentage <strong>of</strong> workers in the sciences comparatively low, it also showed only a small increase <strong>of</strong> 0.2 ppt in 2008. Nevertheless, this small<br />

increase was on par with Ontario’s gain, and just slightly above the national average gain <strong>of</strong> 0.1 ppt. Alberta, by contrast, saw a decline <strong>of</strong> 0.3 ppt, as its oil<br />

and gas sector slowed down.<br />

In a labour market study conducted in February 2008, the <strong>BC</strong> Technology Industries Association predicted that <strong>BC</strong> would see 5,000 new technology jobs<br />

by September 1, 2008. 21 The economic challenges in late 2008 dampened the real numbers, but there is no question that many <strong>of</strong> these predicted jobs were<br />

realized. In addition, science-related jobs emerged in several <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s traditional sectors, as industry evolved to become more competitive and meet growing<br />

market challenges. Hopefully this growth will continue, as it will have a positive impact on <strong>BC</strong>’s productivity.<br />

Net government liabilities<br />

Without a strong and productive work and investment climate, the <strong>BC</strong> government is severely limited in its ability to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> citizens, and in its<br />

ability to pay down debt.<br />

The net government liability indicator measures past fiscal policy and future tax burden. 22 In 2007, <strong>BC</strong>’s financial liabilities declined by 2 ppt, comprising<br />

only 6.9% <strong>of</strong> the GDP. In Alberta, where all provincial government debt has been eliminated, the ratio was -6.4%. Ontario posted a decline <strong>of</strong> 1.1 ppt, and<br />

saw its government liabilities drop to 21.4%; while Canada posted a decline <strong>of</strong> 1.7 ppt, and saw its government liabilities drop to 20.8%. By the end <strong>of</strong> 2007,<br />

strong economic growth, positive government revenues, and prudent fiscal policy had all laid the groundwork <strong>for</strong> lower government debt in <strong>BC</strong>. But the<br />

tumultuous economic and financial events <strong>of</strong> 2008, and a correlative growth in unemployment, severely altered the context <strong>for</strong> government spending.<br />

In February 2009, the government <strong>for</strong>ecast a budget deficit <strong>of</strong> $495 million. However, by the time the September 2009 budget update was released, that<br />

figure had jumped to $2.8 billion <strong>for</strong> the 2009/10 fiscal year, $1.7 billion <strong>for</strong> 2010/11, and $945 million <strong>for</strong> 2011/12. It is clear that the economic downturn<br />

hit the <strong>BC</strong> <strong>economy</strong> much harder than the government had anticipated. Other jurisdictions, like Alberta, are also predicting increased debt as the full implications<br />

<strong>of</strong> the economic downturn become clear.<br />

Lower than <strong>for</strong>ecasted income tax and resource royalties are the primary causes <strong>for</strong> this about-face. According to the provincial government, compared to<br />

the February 2009 Budget, taxation revenue is expected to decline by 6.9% in the fiscal year 2009/10, by a further 4.6% in 2010/11, and by another 2.9%<br />

in 2011/12. In addition, the estimates <strong>for</strong> natural resource royalties <strong>for</strong> the next three years have declined by $2.1 billion since February.<br />

Overall<br />

The results <strong>for</strong> <strong>BC</strong>’s investment climate were not encouraging in 2008, and the outlook <strong>for</strong> 2009 is even bleaker. Even though we are working through a<br />

recession, continued investment in machinery and equipment, technology, and education <strong>for</strong> workers is necessary if we are to increase <strong>BC</strong>’s productivity and<br />

begin to put our <strong>economy</strong> back on solid ground.<br />

Where do we go from here?<br />

A strong <strong>economy</strong> is the backbone <strong>of</strong> our society. Creating an environment that encourages investment in technology, infrastructure, and education spurs<br />

companies and workers to become more productive, thereby driving up pr<strong>of</strong>its and wages. This, in turn, creates more jobs, lowers unemployment, and boosts<br />

personal disposable incomes. In addition, increased economic activity provides increased revenues to government, providing money <strong>for</strong> the social services we<br />

all depend on. Our <strong>economy</strong> and society is interconnected, and without gains in all three <strong>of</strong> our report areas—live, work, and invest—we will remain vulnerable.<br />

<strong>BC</strong>’s <strong>economy</strong> has been through a lot in the past 12 months, and it looks like we have a long way to go be<strong>for</strong>e our <strong>economy</strong> begins to see the kind <strong>of</strong> growth<br />

that was, until recently, taken <strong>for</strong> granted. After a year <strong>of</strong> modest growth in 2008, and a year <strong>of</strong> contraction in 2009 (to date), the 2010 <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up will<br />

provide an interesting benchmark. In the meantime, the only thing that’s certain is that the financial crisis and economic downturn resulting from the events<br />

<strong>of</strong> last fall will deeply impact the provincial, national, and global economies <strong>for</strong> years to come.<br />

A full version <strong>of</strong> the 2009 <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up is available at<br />

www.bccheckup.com. And if you’d like to participate in the <strong>BC</strong> Check-Up<br />

project, please contact me at brkich@ica.bc.ca.<br />

21<br />

Techtalent <strong>BC</strong>, Labour Trends in the <strong>BC</strong> Technology Sector, carried out by the <strong>BC</strong> Technology Industries Association, February 2008.<br />

22<br />

Our indicator—net government financial liability as a percentage <strong>of</strong> GDP—is derived from Financial Management System (FMS) data <strong>of</strong> Statistics<br />

Canada. The numerator—net government financial liability—is defined as total provincial financial assets (including sinking funds) minus financial<br />

liabilities, plus guaranteed debt. Guaranteed debt is defined as a guarantee issued by the provincial government on behalf <strong>of</strong> its crown corporations that<br />

could lead to a claim on the government if a corporation does not meet its obligations. The FMS provincial government data provides consistent results<br />

that can be compared between provinces. For more in<strong>for</strong>mation on the FMS system <strong>of</strong> accounting, see Statistics Canada Cat. No. 68F0023.<br />

18 ica.bc.ca October ’09


Tax Traps & Tips<br />

Crystallizing the<br />

Capital Gains<br />

Exemption in the<br />

Context <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

Succession<br />

By Jimmy Kwan, CA, CFA<br />

An estate freeze is a common technique<br />

used in business succession planning.<br />

A typical arrangement <strong>of</strong> an estate<br />

freeze in the context <strong>of</strong> a private corporation is to<br />

“freeze” the value <strong>of</strong> the shares <strong>of</strong> a corporation<br />

by exchanging the owner’s common shares <strong>for</strong><br />

fixed-value preferred shares. With all <strong>of</strong> the<br />

corporation’s value after the freeze being<br />

attached to the fixed-value preferred shares, the<br />

owner’s heirs or related parties are able to<br />

subscribe <strong>for</strong> common shares <strong>of</strong> the corporation<br />

<strong>for</strong> a nominal amount. The future appreciation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> the corporation will then accrue<br />

to these heirs and related parties.<br />

There are, <strong>of</strong> course, other options. Many<br />

owners, <strong>for</strong> example, choose to pass their<br />

corporations on to the next generation simply<br />

by selling to their heirs. These owners have the<br />

option <strong>of</strong> triggering the capital gains exemption<br />

(CGE), the benefits <strong>of</strong> which have been extolled<br />

in numerous articles. But does this mean that<br />

owners should always claim the CGE when they<br />

transfer shares to family members?<br />

Comparing sources <strong>of</strong><br />

retirement income<br />

Let’s assume the owner (Owner) <strong>of</strong> a Canadiancontrolled<br />

private corporation (Opco) is<br />

considering retirement and would like to “cash<br />

out” to secure sufficient financial resources to<br />

maintain his lifestyle needs after retirement. If<br />

a complete freeze has been implemented, as<br />

described above, the Owner could simply<br />

redeem the preferred shares over his lifetime to<br />

provide himself with dividend income.<br />

Alternatively, the owner could cash out by: 1) making an outright sale to unrelated parties; 2) making<br />

a sale to related successors and claiming the capital gains exemption (CGE); or 3) making a sale to related<br />

successors and not claiming the CGE.<br />

So which <strong>of</strong> these options would be the most tax efficient?<br />

Facts and assumptions<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e getting into a detailed numerical analysis, these are the top marginal <strong>BC</strong> personal rates 1 (2009)<br />

that will be used in this article:<br />

Income 43.70%<br />

Capital gains 21.85%<br />

Eligible dividends 2 19.92%<br />

Ineligible dividends 3 32.71%<br />

For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this article, let’s assume that:<br />

• The fair market value <strong>of</strong> Opco is $1,000,000;<br />

• The adjusted cost base and paid-up capital is nominal;<br />

• The $750,000 CGE is available; and<br />

• If the Owner were to implement the estate freeze as noted above, his daughter (Successor) would be<br />

the only person who would subscribe <strong>for</strong> common shares <strong>of</strong> Opco.<br />

Estate freeze strategy<br />

Under the estate freeze strategy, the Owner could exchange, on a tax-deferred basis, his common shares<br />

<strong>for</strong> preferred shares with a redemption value <strong>of</strong> $1 million, as per section 86 <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax Act<br />

(Act). If the Owner were to redeem these preferred shares over his lifetime to cover cash flow needs, his<br />

income taxes would be between $199,200 and $327,100, depending on whether eligible dividends<br />

could be declared when the shares are redeemed. Note: The range <strong>of</strong> income taxes would be higher if<br />

not all the shares were redeemed in 2009, as the tax rates on both eligible and ineligible dividends will<br />

increase in the next few years.<br />

It is reasonably common <strong>for</strong> owner-managers to monitor the inactive assets <strong>of</strong> their Canadiancontrolled<br />

private corporations (CCPCs) to ensure that the shares <strong>of</strong> their CCPCs are qualified small<br />

business shares; this, in turn, ensures that the CGE can be claimed upon disposition. As a result, many<br />

CCPCs do not carry sufficient cash to redeem the preferred shares.<br />

To use the example <strong>of</strong> Opco: In order to generate cash to redeem the preferred shares, Opco would have<br />

to either sell assets or generate cash flows from its operations. Selling assets might not be a desirable<br />

choice, however, as it may result in capital gains and recapture.<br />

In order to generate $1 million from operations to redeem the preferred shares, Opco would incur<br />

approximately $156,000 <strong>of</strong> income taxes, assuming all income from operations is eligible <strong>for</strong> the small<br />

business deduction. 4<br />

Sale to unrelated parties<br />

This article focuses primarily on business succession involving heirs and related parties, but<br />

it’s worth noting that if Opco could be sold to unrelated parties and the $750,000 CGE were available<br />

to the Owner, the Owner’s income tax liability would be approximately $54,625, 5 ignoring the impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> alternate minimum tax (AMT).<br />

1<br />

These are the substantially enacted rates from August 2009.<br />

2<br />

The top marginal <strong>BC</strong> personal rate on eligible dividends is expected to increase to by approximately 26% in 2012.<br />

3<br />

The top marginal <strong>BC</strong> personal rate on ineligible dividends is expected to increase to by approximately 34% in 2012.<br />

4<br />

In order to generate $1 million, Opco would need to earn a taxable income <strong>of</strong> $1,156,000, as the income eligible <strong>for</strong> the small business deduction is taxed at<br />

13.5% in <strong>BC</strong>. Obviously, the $1,156,000 would have to be earned over a few years in order <strong>for</strong> the entire balance to be eligible <strong>for</strong> the small business<br />

deduction.<br />

20 ica.bc.ca October ’09


Sale to the successor<br />

If the CGE is claimed<br />

The Owner can sell shares worth $1 million to<br />

the Successor. If he were to claim the CGE, his<br />

tax liability would be approximately $54,625, 6<br />

ignoring AMT. However, the Successor would<br />

have to come up with $1 million in after-tax<br />

funds to finance the purchase <strong>of</strong> the shares.<br />

With the entitlement <strong>of</strong> the small business<br />

deduction, it would always be more tax efficient<br />

<strong>for</strong> Opco to generate the $1 million proceeds<br />

than to generate the $1 million at the personal<br />

level. To that end, one strategy would be <strong>for</strong> the<br />

Successor to incorporate a holding company<br />

(Holdco). She could then transfer the shares <strong>of</strong><br />

Opco to Holdco on a tax-deferred basis, as per<br />

section 85 <strong>of</strong> the Act. Note: As a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> paragraphs 84.1(1)(b) and<br />

84.1(2)(a.1) <strong>of</strong> the Act, the Successor could only<br />

take back a non-shares consideration (such as a<br />

promissory note) <strong>of</strong> $250,000. 7<br />

If Opco were to generate after-tax funds <strong>of</strong><br />

$250,000, it could pay tax-free, inter-corporate<br />

dividends to Holdco, and Holdco could then<br />

repay the $250,000 to the Successor without any<br />

further tax consequences. However, the Successor<br />

would still need to come up with after-tax funds<br />

<strong>of</strong> $750,000 to repay the Owner. In this case,<br />

Opco would have to earn a pre-tax income <strong>of</strong><br />

$1,288,500 so that an after-tax income <strong>of</strong><br />

$1,114,600 8 could be paid to the Successor as<br />

ineligible dividends through Holdco. At the<br />

marginal rate <strong>of</strong> 32.71%, the Successor would then<br />

have after-tax funds <strong>of</strong> $750,000. There<strong>for</strong>e, the<br />

total income tax required to generate $750,000<br />

at the Successor’s and Opco’s level would be<br />

$538,500.<br />

Similarly, in order <strong>for</strong> Opco to pay intercorporate<br />

dividends <strong>of</strong> $250,000, it would need to<br />

generate $289,000 9 in pre-tax income. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

the income tax at Opco’s level would be<br />

$39,000. In summary, the total income taxes<br />

would be $577,500.<br />

Although the tax liability at the Owner’s level<br />

would be substantially less than under the estate<br />

freeze strategy, the overall family tax liability<br />

would be much higher.<br />

If the CGE is not claimed<br />

If the Owner chose not to claim the CGE, his tax liability would be approximately $218,500, 10 ignoring<br />

AMT. The Successor could then transfer the shares <strong>of</strong> Opco to Holdco and take back a promissory<br />

note <strong>of</strong> $1,000,000. Opco would only be required to generate $1,156,000 11 to net $1,000,000 in<br />

after-tax funds, and the $1,000,000 could then be paid to Holdco and the Successor to repay the<br />

promissory note owed to the Owner.<br />

Alternatively, the Owner could sell the shares <strong>of</strong> Opco to Holdco directly <strong>for</strong> a promissory note.<br />

However, due to the application <strong>of</strong> paragraph 84.1(1)(b) <strong>of</strong> the Act, the capital gain the Owner would<br />

have otherwise realized by selling the shares directly to the Successor would now be converted into a<br />

taxable dividend, and the result would be the same as in the estate freeze strategy.<br />

Comparing tax costs<br />

The following table summarizes the tax costs associated with each <strong>of</strong> the options discussed in this<br />

article (with the exception <strong>of</strong> the sale to unrelated parties).<br />

Estate Freeze Sale to the Sale to the<br />

strategy Successor with CGE Successor without CGE<br />

The Owner’s $327,100 $54,625 $218,500<br />

income tax liability<br />

Income taxes incurred $156,000 $577,500 $156,000<br />

to generate $1 million<br />

after-tax funds<br />

Total family income $483,100 $632,125 $374,500<br />

taxes<br />

To crystallize the CGE or not?<br />

It is obvious that our hypothetical Owner would incur the least amount <strong>of</strong> income tax if he were to sell<br />

the shares to the Successor and claim the CGE. However, this strategy would be the worst choice <strong>of</strong> the<br />

three if minimizing total family income taxes is the higher priority.<br />

It appears that a sale without the CGE would be superior to the estate freeze strategy when it comes<br />

to minimizing family income taxes. This will be especially true beginning in 2011, when the personal<br />

tax rate on eligible dividends in <strong>BC</strong> surpasses the rate on capital gains. Still, with the existence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

capital dividend account (CDA), refundable dividend tax on hand (RDTOH), and general rate income<br />

pool (GRIP) balances, the result could be totally different, making the estate freeze strategy preferable<br />

in certain cases.<br />

Something else to consider: Under the sale options, the Owner’s income tax could only be deferred<br />

<strong>for</strong> a maximum <strong>of</strong> 10 years 12 ; under the estate freeze strategy, however, the Owner would only be liable<br />

<strong>for</strong> the income taxes on the redemption <strong>of</strong> the preferred shares—in other words, the income tax could<br />

be deferred until redemption.<br />

Consider the options<br />

The calculations presented in this article are <strong>for</strong> illustrative purposes only, as many assumptions have<br />

been included. Readers are advised that a numerical comparison <strong>of</strong> the tax results <strong>of</strong> cashing out from<br />

different alternatives should always be per<strong>for</strong>med, and that quantitative factors should not be considered<br />

alone—sufficient weight should be given to qualitative factors as well.<br />

Jimmy Kwan, CA, CFA, is a senior manager with Manning Elliott LLP in Vancouver.<br />

5<br />

$250,000 x 21.85%.<br />

6<br />

Again, $250,000 x 21.85%.<br />

7<br />

As the Opco shares were acquired in a non-arm’s length transaction, the adjusted cost base <strong>for</strong> the purposes <strong>of</strong> section 84.1 would be reduced under<br />

paragraph 84.1(2)(a.1) by any CGEs claimed by the non-arm’s length person after 1984. There<strong>for</strong>e, the adjusted cost base <strong>of</strong> Opco shares <strong>for</strong> the purposes<br />

<strong>of</strong> section 84.1 would be $250,000 instead <strong>of</strong> $1 million.<br />

8<br />

$1,288,500 x (1 – 13.5%) = $1,114,600.<br />

9<br />

$289,000 x (1 – 13.5%) = $250,000.<br />

10<br />

$1 million x 21.85%.<br />

11<br />

$1,156,000 x (1 – 13.5%) = $1,000,000.<br />

12<br />

Subsection 40(1.1) <strong>of</strong> the Act.<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 21


PD News<br />

For detailed course descriptions or a<br />

complete schedule <strong>of</strong> upcoming PD<br />

seminars, consult your fall 2009 PD<br />

brochure or visit our website at<br />

www.icabc-pd.com. To register, call<br />

the PD department at 604-681-3264.<br />

FALL PD PROGRAM<br />

Don’t miss the opportunity to<br />

attend these conferences:<br />

CAs in Industry PD Day<br />

CAs and financial pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in industry<br />

currently face many challenges on the way to<br />

achieving their pr<strong>of</strong>essional goals, and today’s<br />

economic realities undoubtedly place even more<br />

obstacles in the way. So what can you do to pull<br />

ahead <strong>of</strong> the pack and stay there? You have to stay<br />

in<strong>for</strong>med about emerging trends in financial<br />

management and changes in compliance and<br />

reporting, and be aware <strong>of</strong> other outside influences<br />

that could affect your business. You also<br />

need to focus on the importance <strong>of</strong> leadership,<br />

and on fostering new skills <strong>for</strong> yourself and your<br />

team.<br />

This conference was designed to address these<br />

issues and provide you with a wealth <strong>of</strong> practical<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation to use in your workplace.<br />

Nov 10, 8:40am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Local Government Accounting & Auditing<br />

Seminar<br />

The ICA<strong>BC</strong> is pleased to co-present this seminar<br />

with the Government Finance Officers Association<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>.<br />

New accounting standards are changing the way<br />

we report financial in<strong>for</strong>mation. Expectations <strong>of</strong><br />

accountability are increasing and are changing<br />

the way audits are per<strong>for</strong>med. Financing sources<br />

are getting more complex. This seminar will<br />

in<strong>for</strong>m participants about the latest rules and<br />

practices and how these rules and practices<br />

interact. It will give participants the opportunity<br />

to meet, interact, and exchange ideas with some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the people involved in standard setting.<br />

Participants will see examples <strong>of</strong> how some<br />

communities have dealt with the issues.<br />

Nov 5&6, 8:30am-4:30pm, Vancouver<br />

Accounting & Assurance<br />

Effective Use <strong>of</strong> Analytical Procedures<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this seminar is to expose participants<br />

to the various analytical procedures<br />

available, and the different application techniques<br />

that can be used to maximize the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

audit or review work while continuing to meet<br />

the requirements <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ession. The seminar<br />

is designed <strong>for</strong> supervisors and partners <strong>of</strong> small<br />

or medium-sized firms per<strong>for</strong>ming audit or review<br />

engagements <strong>for</strong> small to medium-sized businesses.<br />

Nov 3, 9am-12:30pm, Kamloops<br />

Nov 9, 1:30-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Nov 20, 1:30-5pm, Victoria<br />

Nov 30, 1:30-5pm, Kelowna<br />

Evaluating Internal Control: A Top-Down<br />

Risk-Based Audit Approach<br />

The traditional “bottom-up” approach to internal<br />

control documentation has <strong>of</strong>ten proven<br />

time-consuming and less than effective in identifying<br />

the key controls, and has sometimes<br />

resulted in over-auditing. Participants <strong>of</strong> this<br />

seminar will learn how to improve the effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> their audits by applying a “top-down”<br />

approach to understanding internal controls and<br />

producing quality audit documentation.<br />

Nov 19, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

19 IFRS SEMINARS THIS FALL<br />

The ICA<strong>BC</strong> is <strong>of</strong>fering 19 IFRS titles this fall. For titles, dates,<br />

and locations, please see the fall PD brochure or visit our<br />

website at www.icabc-pd.com.<br />

Understanding Fraud Risk Factors<br />

Your risk <strong>of</strong> being defrauded increases as your<br />

customers, suppliers, and employees face increasing<br />

financial pressures. This seminar will help you<br />

address and reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> fraud by providing<br />

you with an understanding <strong>of</strong> what motivates<br />

fraudsters, the types <strong>of</strong> frauds commonly perpetrated,<br />

and the policies and procedures that can<br />

be implemented to reduce fraud risk.<br />

The seminar will be taught by experienced<br />

fraud investigators who will share their stories<br />

and experience with participants. Case studies<br />

will be reviewed, as will classic frauds (such as<br />

Ponzi schemes) and management frauds (such as<br />

Lord Black).<br />

Nov 3, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Finance/NPO/Public<br />

Companies<br />

Analysis, Financing, and Completion <strong>of</strong><br />

Acquisitions<br />

More and more CAs, both in industry and<br />

public practice, are involved in corporate or asset<br />

acquisitions. The objective <strong>of</strong> this seminar is to<br />

help participants act as key members in all<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> an acquisition (or divestiture)—from<br />

the selection <strong>of</strong> an appropriate target through<br />

the entire valuation process, to how to make the<br />

new part <strong>of</strong> the corporate family work properly.<br />

Nov 17, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Assurance & Accounting Issues <strong>for</strong> Public<br />

Companies<br />

This seminar will address the most pressing<br />

assurance and accounting issues faced by auditors<br />

<strong>of</strong> Canadian publicly traded companies today.<br />

Publications, case studies, and discussion will be<br />

used to identify the common reporting problems<br />

found by regulators, provide practical advice on<br />

new reporting requirements, and illustrate best<br />

practices.<br />

Nov 6, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Not-<strong>for</strong>-Pr<strong>of</strong>it Organizations and Registered<br />

Charities: Accounting, Auditing, and<br />

Taxation Issues<br />

The accounting, tax, and reporting rules <strong>for</strong> not<strong>for</strong>-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

organizations (NPOs) differ substantially<br />

from those that apply to private sector organizations.<br />

Without a solid understanding <strong>of</strong> these<br />

rules, individuals in financial reporting positions<br />

with NPOs may encounter difficulties meeting<br />

their reporting requirements.<br />

This seminar will address accounting, auditing,<br />

and income tax issues specific to NPOs.<br />

Nov 9, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Nov 17, 9am-5pm, Victoria<br />

22 ica.bc.ca October ’09


Not-<strong>for</strong>-Pr<strong>of</strong>it Organizations – Acctg Issues<br />

This seminar will provide an overview <strong>of</strong> the<br />

accounting standards <strong>for</strong> not-<strong>for</strong>-pr<strong>of</strong>it organizations<br />

(NPOs), and review the application <strong>of</strong><br />

GAAP with an emphasis on the areas where<br />

choices have to be made in the preparation <strong>of</strong><br />

financial statements.<br />

This seminar is aimed at individuals who are<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> preparing, analysing, and/or<br />

auditing financial statements <strong>for</strong> smaller NPOs.<br />

Oct 28, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Dec 2, 9am-5pm, Victoria<br />

Management<br />

Better Connections: How to Create<br />

Improved Business Relationships<br />

Communication may be the glue that connects<br />

people, but it doesn’t come easily <strong>for</strong> many <strong>of</strong><br />

us. The objective <strong>of</strong> this seminar is to help you<br />

create better client and co-worker relationships.<br />

If you want to feel com<strong>for</strong>table when first<br />

meeting people, know what to say, make a good<br />

impression, and build trust and confidence, this<br />

workshop is <strong>for</strong> you.<br />

Oct 19, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

CFO’s Role to the Board <strong>of</strong> Directors<br />

The CFO role continues to grow and expand<br />

far beyond the basic custodianship <strong>of</strong> the books<br />

and records. Today’s CFO is responsible <strong>for</strong><br />

ensuring that the overall direction <strong>of</strong> the business<br />

is consistent with the direction given by the<br />

board <strong>of</strong> directors. This one-day program will<br />

provide participants with a clear understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> the concerns <strong>of</strong> board members and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

CFO’s role and responsibilities to the board.<br />

Oct 26, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Practical Tips <strong>for</strong> Controllers and CFOs<br />

This seminar will provide a wide range <strong>of</strong> useful<br />

tips and tools <strong>for</strong> controllers—tips that are not<br />

normally provided in seminars or textbooks.<br />

These tips and tools will be illustrated with<br />

interesting anecdotes and examples. Participants<br />

will also have the opportunity to share experiences<br />

and practices.<br />

Oct 26, 9am-5pm, Victoria<br />

Oct 27, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Shortcut to Success: The 14 Best Tools <strong>for</strong><br />

Personal and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Growth<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this seminar is to focus on<br />

the techniques that will help you achieve your<br />

personal and pr<strong>of</strong>essional goals. You will learn<br />

what really leads to success in the modern world:<br />

mastering the art <strong>of</strong> communication, discovering<br />

the magic <strong>of</strong> motivation, overcoming fears, and<br />

tapping into your creativity and intuition.<br />

Nov 17, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Strategic Planning: The Basics<br />

CAs in industry are required to work closely<br />

with their CEOs and other members <strong>of</strong> their<br />

management teams to create and implement<br />

winning strategies in the marketplace.<br />

This seminar will provide participants with a<br />

clear understanding <strong>of</strong> the basic concepts <strong>of</strong><br />

strategic planning. It is designed <strong>for</strong> financial<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who are new to strategic planning<br />

and <strong>for</strong> those who have not been involved in<br />

strategic planning <strong>for</strong> some time and want to<br />

review and update their knowledge.<br />

Oct 27, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Taxation<br />

Basic Canadian Income Tax Issues in Cross<br />

Border Transactions<br />

This half-day seminar will provide participants<br />

with a basic overview <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> key issues,<br />

including certain Canadian income tax reporting<br />

requirements relating to the taxation <strong>of</strong> transactions<br />

between Canadian companies and non-resident<br />

businesses.<br />

Nov 5, 9am-12:30pm, Vancouver<br />

Tax <strong>for</strong> Controllers<br />

Small, growing, and mid-sized companies face<br />

a broad array <strong>of</strong> tax and related compliance<br />

requirements, and the penalties and/or tax costs<br />

<strong>of</strong> failing to meet these requirements can be<br />

severe. Without an in-house tax department, the<br />

responsibility <strong>for</strong> this area falls on the controller.<br />

This seminar will help controllers stay current<br />

about a broad range <strong>of</strong> tax and related compliance<br />

issues, and will provide a comprehensive<br />

review with cases and examples to draw attention<br />

to common problem areas..<br />

The seminar will cover the in<strong>for</strong>mation necessary<br />

<strong>for</strong> sales, operations, and/or personnel operating<br />

in any province or territory. In addition, the<br />

seminar will cover basic tax issues relating to<br />

export sales, corporate structure, and audits and<br />

appeals.<br />

Nov 5-6, 9am-5pm, Abbots<strong>for</strong>d<br />

Nov 19-20, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

Dec 2-3, 9am-5pm, Victoria<br />

Transfer Pricing: Latest Developments and<br />

Dealings with Tax Authorities<br />

This seminar will review the latest transfer pricing<br />

developments in Canada and internationally,<br />

and will address strategies <strong>for</strong> dealing with, and<br />

resolving, CRA transfer pricing audits. The<br />

seminar will include one case study and some<br />

interactive sections.<br />

Oct 27, 9am-12:30pm, Vancouver<br />

US Taxation <strong>of</strong> Foreign Nationals<br />

This seminar will provide a general understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> US taxation <strong>of</strong> resident and non-resident<br />

aliens <strong>of</strong> the US who are non-US citizens.<br />

Emphasis will be placed on the determination <strong>of</strong><br />

residency <strong>for</strong> US tax purposes, US tax filing<br />

elections to minimize US taxation <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>eign<br />

nationals, and treaty positions. Case studies and<br />

discussions will be included.<br />

Oct 20, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

US Taxation <strong>of</strong> US Citizens Abroad<br />

US citizens and resident aliens <strong>of</strong> the US are<br />

taxed on their worldwide income. Those not<br />

currently residing in the US must continue to<br />

file US tax returns and compute tax by referring<br />

to the same tax rules as if they were still residing<br />

in the US. However, these individuals may be<br />

able to exclude from US taxation all or parts <strong>of</strong><br />

their <strong>for</strong>eign-earned income. Where the same<br />

income is subject to <strong>for</strong>eign taxation, the US<br />

provides a measure <strong>of</strong> relief in the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> credits<br />

or deductions <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>eign taxes.<br />

This seminar will provide a general understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> how the United States taxes US citizens and<br />

resident aliens abroad.<br />

Nov 3, 9am-5pm, Vancouver<br />

CICA Conference on<br />

Succession Planning<br />

November 18-19, 2009<br />

Simon Fraser University, Vancouver<br />

Statistics show that between 80<br />

and 90% <strong>of</strong> Canadian businesses are<br />

family-owned, and less than one out<br />

<strong>of</strong> three <strong>of</strong> these businesses will<br />

continue as a family operation into<br />

the second generation. This two-day<br />

conference will provide a comprehensive<br />

overview <strong>of</strong> succession<br />

planning with plenary and concurrent<br />

sessions, as well as a panel discussion<br />

featuring family business owners<br />

who will share their experiences and<br />

lessons learned. All sessions will be<br />

delivered by experienced presenters<br />

who are experts in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

succession planning. Come away<br />

with the knowledge and skills needed<br />

to lead a transition team <strong>for</strong> optimum<br />

results.<br />

For further in<strong>for</strong>mation and to<br />

register <strong>for</strong> this conference, go to:<br />

www.cpd.cica.ca/SuccessionPlanning<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 23


Plugged In: News <strong>for</strong> and about members & students<br />

Announcements<br />

Congratulations!<br />

Gary Powroznik, FCA, has founded a new company, G-Force Group, after a successful 34-year career with<br />

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, which included 13 years as managing partner in <strong>BC</strong>. G-Force Group specializes in business,<br />

real estate, and loan recovery solutions. Powroznik also currently serves on the board <strong>of</strong> the VGH & U<strong>BC</strong> Hospital<br />

Foundation and is chair <strong>of</strong> Focus Foundation <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong>. He <strong>for</strong>merly served on several other boards, including the Sauder<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Business and the Business Council <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. More in<strong>for</strong>mation on G-Force Group is available at<br />

www.g-<strong>for</strong>cegroup.ca.<br />

James Topham, CA, has been named to the board <strong>of</strong> directors and the audit committee <strong>of</strong> Day4 Energy Inc., a<br />

manufacturer <strong>of</strong> solar electric modules. Topham recently retired from a successful 30-year career with KPMG LLP, which<br />

included 20 years as an audit partner in the technology companies and computer audit practices. He has been the lead<br />

partner <strong>for</strong> audit and related services <strong>for</strong> over 30 Canadian and/or US public companies, and currently serves as a director<br />

<strong>for</strong> OverInteractive Media Inc., New Media <strong>BC</strong>, the Clean Energy Technology Advisory Board, and <strong>BC</strong> Social Venture<br />

Partners. Topham also currently serves on the ICA<strong>BC</strong> Council.<br />

Upcoming Events <strong>for</strong> Fraser Valley CA Association<br />

The Fraser Valley CA Association invites CAs to join as members or drop in <strong>for</strong> its monthly meetings. Meetings include a<br />

full breakfast and a pr<strong>of</strong>essional presentation that also earns CPD credits.<br />

October 14, 2009<br />

Ed Kr<strong>of</strong>t<br />

Special Presentation at the Ramada<br />

Contact laurie@fvcaa.ca to reserve your spot.<br />

November 5, 2009<br />

Chris Duggan and Shawn Siak<br />

International Markets & Global Trading<br />

Contact laurie@fvcaa.ca to reserve your spot.<br />

More in<strong>for</strong>mation is available at www.fvcaa.ca.<br />

24 ica.bc.ca October ’09


The ICA<strong>BC</strong> Member Recognition Program<br />

Do you know a CA who has gone the extra mile in the community, made an exemplary<br />

contribution to the pr<strong>of</strong>ession, or achieved outstanding success early in his or her career?<br />

Acknowledge their achievements by nominating them <strong>for</strong> an ICA<strong>BC</strong> award!<br />

You can nominate a colleague <strong>for</strong>:<br />

Fellowship (FCA)<br />

Lifetime Achievement<br />

The Honorary CA Designation<br />

Early Achievement<br />

Community Service<br />

The Ritchie W. McCloy Award <strong>for</strong> CA Volunteerism<br />

Nomination deadlines:<br />

• Fellowship, Lifetime Achievement, Honorary CA: October 15, 2009<br />

• Early Achievement Award: October 31, 2009<br />

• Community Service Award: January 31, 2010<br />

• Ritchie W. McCloy Award: January 31, 2010<br />

Nomination <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

Forms are available on the <strong>Institute</strong> website at www.ica.bc.ca<br />

under Member Centre>Forms>Member Recognition>Nomination Forms.<br />

REMINDER: Nominations <strong>for</strong> the Election <strong>of</strong> FCAs<br />

Each year, members are asked to identify chartered accountants who have rendered distinguished service to the<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession, and to consider nominating these individuals <strong>for</strong> election to the <strong>Institute</strong>’s Fellowship.<br />

The <strong>of</strong>ficial procedures <strong>for</strong> the election <strong>of</strong> Fellows appeared in the September 2009 issue <strong>of</strong> Beyond Numbers<br />

magazine (pages 26-27).<br />

Nominations <strong>for</strong>ms must be received at the <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice by October 15, 2009.<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 25


CA Social Networking Group Hosts<br />

Baseball Barbecue<br />

By John Mackenzie, CA and Jennifer Tokarek, CA<br />

It was a beautiful evening on June 22, 2009, when the ICA<strong>BC</strong>’s CA Social Networking Group hosted a Vancouver Canadians’ “BBQ Picnic in the Park”<br />

at Nat Bailey Stadium in Vancouver. The Vancouver Canadians dominated the Everett Aquasox in a 7-1 victory, providing a terrific finish to an evening<br />

<strong>of</strong> fun <strong>for</strong> the assembled throng <strong>of</strong> CAs.<br />

We had a great turnout <strong>of</strong> members from both industry and public practice, providing a wonderful mix <strong>for</strong> the networking event. There was plenty <strong>of</strong><br />

opportunity <strong>for</strong> CAs to mingle be<strong>for</strong>e the game, as we enjoyed an excellent barbeque dinner (and dodged the occasional foul ball).<br />

Our CA group also enjoyed the evening’s various entertainment breaks, including the 4th inning “Sushi Race,” featuring the Vancouver Canadians’ sushi<br />

mascots, “Chef Wasabi,” “Ms. <strong>BC</strong> Roll,” and “Mr. Kappa Maki. (For the record, Chef Wasabi gave up an early lead after becoming distracted by wildly<br />

cheering fans and being overtaken by Ms. <strong>BC</strong> Roll, the ultimate victor.) And <strong>of</strong> course there was the famous “7th inning stretch,” which featured interactive<br />

classics like the hokey pokey, led by Nat Bailey’s synchronized dancers (aka the groundskeepers).<br />

To cap things <strong>of</strong>f, Nat Bailey Stadium was kind enough to <strong>of</strong>fer the CA Social Networking Group three dozen ticket vouchers <strong>for</strong> an upcoming Vancouver<br />

Canadians game, which we then donated to the Boys & Girls Clubs <strong>of</strong> Greater Vancouver and the Kids Up Front Foundation. These two children’s charities<br />

were very appreciative <strong>of</strong> the ticket vouchers, and told us the kids had a terrific time using them.<br />

We’d like to thank those <strong>of</strong> you who came out, and we hope to see you (and many new faces) at our next event, a <strong>BC</strong>-themed wine tasting at The Refinery<br />

in downtown Vancouver. Please note: At the time <strong>of</strong> this writing, our fall event hadn’t yet happened, so you can expect to see a recap <strong>of</strong> the wine tasting in<br />

the November issue <strong>of</strong> Beyond Numbers!<br />

John Mackenzie, CA, is a portfolio manager with Odlum Brown Limited in Vancouver, and co-chair <strong>of</strong> the CA Social Networking Group, along with Jennifer<br />

Tokarek, CA, the Western Canada regional tax manager <strong>for</strong> TD Waterhouse Private Client Services.<br />

The Vancouver Canadians take the field in a game against the Everett Aquasox.<br />

26 ica.bc.ca October ’09


Nominate a future president<br />

Think you know a CA who could lead the ICA<strong>BC</strong> through a constantly evolving environment? Nominate<br />

them <strong>for</strong> future presidency!<br />

We’re looking <strong>for</strong> CAs who are dynamic leaders and front-runners in their pr<strong>of</strong>essions and<br />

communities—CAs who have the ability to inspire others.<br />

The candidate chosen by Council will be appointed third VP <strong>of</strong> the ICA<strong>BC</strong> in early 2010, and must seek<br />

election to Council if they are not already a Council member. If elected, this individual will subsequently<br />

be appointed second VP in June 2010. Then, provided that they remain an elected member <strong>of</strong> Council,<br />

they will be appointed first VP in 2011, and president in 2012.<br />

Nomination steps:<br />

• Submit a nomination <strong>for</strong>m. Forms are available on the ICA<strong>BC</strong> website at www.ica.bc.ca under Member<br />

Centre>Forms>Member Recognition>Nomination Forms>Presidential Nomination Form. You can also<br />

access the <strong>for</strong>m by direct link at www.ica.bc.ca/pdf/presidentialnominations.pdf, or by contacting<br />

Sandy Parcher, the manager <strong>of</strong> the Executive Office, at parcher@ica.bc.ca<br />

or 604-488-2602.<br />

• Be aware that candidates, proposers, and seconders must be members<br />

in good standing with the ICA<strong>BC</strong>.<br />

• Tell us why you think the nominee should be considered <strong>for</strong> election<br />

to the ICA<strong>BC</strong> presidency. Please note: Candidates should have<br />

demonstrated leadership in one or more <strong>of</strong> the following areas:<br />

The work <strong>of</strong> the British Columbia or Canadian <strong>Institute</strong><br />

The pursuit <strong>of</strong> his/her career<br />

Voluntary service (with business, charitable, civic, community,<br />

political, or pr<strong>of</strong>essional organizations)<br />

Research, teaching, writing, or speaking on pr<strong>of</strong>essional matters<br />

• Make sure the nominee will accept the position if selected.<br />

Nomination <strong>for</strong>ms should be marked<br />

“Confidential” and addressed to:<br />

Attn: Chair <strong>of</strong> the Presidential Nominating Committee<br />

c/o <strong>Chartered</strong> <strong>Accountants</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong><br />

Suite 500, One Bentall Centre<br />

505 Burrard St, Box 22<br />

Vancouver, <strong>BC</strong> V7X 1M4<br />

All nomination <strong>for</strong>ms must<br />

be received at the ICA<strong>BC</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fice by January 4, 2010.<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 27


At Your Service<br />

Personalized Portfolio Management<br />

Taxable, Registered, Tax-Free,<br />

and Pension Fund Accounts<br />

H20-000-424_CS2_FIN.indd 1<br />

Practice Limited to U.S. and Cross-border Tax Matters<br />

3/6/09 2:31:33 PM<br />

US and Cross-border Tax Specialist Team<br />

Our practice is limited to US and Cross-border tax matters<br />

working principally with Canadian business and investment<br />

in the US and US citizens resident in Canada.<br />

Tax Strategies<br />

• Canadians with US Business Activities and Investments<br />

• US Citizens Resident in Canada • Immigration to/from US<br />

• Cross-Border Ownership Strategies <strong>for</strong>:<br />

> US and Canadian Real Estate > US Investment and Operations in Canada<br />

Tax Return Preparation<br />

NOTE: Logo font ratio is 28pt Optima bold <strong>for</strong> the title<br />

• US Federal, and 11pt State Trebuchet and Canadian MS <strong>for</strong> the Individual slogan. Income Tax Returns<br />

• US Federal and State Business Income Tax Returns<br />

Warren Dueck, CA - Steven Flynn, CA<br />

phone: 604.448.0200 fax: 604.448.9294 www.wldtax.com<br />

KOTLER van den BRINK & COMPANY<br />

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Consultants<br />

! U.S. Federal and State Compliance<br />

! Cross-Border Tax Structures<br />

! Corporations " Partnerships " LLC’s<br />

! Individuals " Estates " Trusts<br />

SERVING OTHER PROFESSIONALS SINCE 1988<br />

MARC W. KOTLER, CA<br />

T (604) 531-6207 ! F (604) 538-9713 ! E marc@kvdb.com<br />

www.kvdb.com<br />

28 ica.bc.ca October ’09


At Your Service<br />

quinellaauto.com<br />

Save on the purchase and lease <strong>of</strong> new and used vehicles<br />

Call Greg Huynh <strong>for</strong> your best possible price<br />

WE MAKE YOUR VEHICLE PURCHASES HASSLE-FREE<br />

Phone: 604.929.GREG (4734) or 1.800.300.GREG (4734)<br />

www.quinellaauto.com<br />

Dealer: 8262<br />

Serving <strong>BC</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Associations since 1973<br />

Classifieds<br />

Employment<br />

SURREY CA FIRM LOOKING TO PURCHASE A BLOCK OF<br />

CLIENTS<br />

A well-established accounting firm is looking to expand its<br />

operations by way <strong>of</strong> a purchase <strong>of</strong> an existing block <strong>of</strong><br />

clients from a sole practitioner or small partnership. We are a<br />

firm with a wide range <strong>of</strong> experience, a personal touch, and a<br />

focus on owner-managed business and personal taxes. If you<br />

are looking <strong>for</strong> a succession opportunity, we would be happy<br />

to see if we would be a good fit <strong>for</strong> your clients to make the<br />

transition as smooth as possible. Every opportunity will be<br />

explored, including the possibility <strong>of</strong> keeping existing facilities<br />

and staff. Please feel free to respond in confidence care <strong>of</strong><br />

Beyond Numbers, Box 09091.<br />

DYNAMIC FIRM ON SUNSHINE COAST SEEKING CA<br />

Looking <strong>for</strong> a real West Coast lifestyle <strong>for</strong> you and your<br />

family? We are a growing and dynamic firm located in Sechelt<br />

on <strong>BC</strong>’s beautiful Sunshine Coast, and we are looking <strong>for</strong> a CA<br />

with 3-5 years experience specifically in assurance<br />

engagements <strong>for</strong> small business and NPOs to take on a<br />

manager’s role within the firm and potential partnership down<br />

the road. If interested, please send an email in confidence to<br />

richard@thecoastgroup.ca. Website: www.thecoastgroup.ca<br />

ACCOUNTING PRACTICES WANTED - VICTORIA AND AREA<br />

We are a well-established, independent, progressive, and<br />

growing CA firm on Southern Vancouver Island looking to<br />

expand. We are currently <strong>of</strong>fering succession opportunities<br />

and options or will consider the purchase <strong>of</strong> a block <strong>of</strong><br />

accounts. If you are looking <strong>for</strong> a retirement/succession<br />

psst... Want a Job that Doesn’t Suck?<br />

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy – and it<br />

makes you downright miserable. Wouldn’t it be nice<br />

to work <strong>for</strong> a firm that pays well, values your opinion<br />

and recognizes that your job isn’t your life?<br />

We’re looking <strong>for</strong> a qualified CA to grow with<br />

our Comox Valley firm. Consider a few <strong>of</strong> the<br />

BENEFITS OF JOINING OUR DYNAMIC TEAM:<br />

FLEXIBLE HOURS<br />

Because no matter what your current boss says, your<br />

personal life is more important than your job<br />

A HEALTHY SALARY<br />

You’ll get competitive pay, full medical and dental<br />

benefits and a Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development fund<br />

A LIFESTYLE ACCOUNT<br />

We’ll help pay <strong>for</strong> your healthy living purchases, like gym<br />

fees, ski passes and golf memberships<br />

PRIDE IN YOUR WORKPLACE<br />

We’ll ask your opinion on all major decisions, and we’ll<br />

actually listen to your feedback<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

We’re <strong>of</strong>ten the first ones to use innovative new<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware, and we’re proud <strong>of</strong> our paperless <strong>of</strong>fice systems<br />

Email Colleen Ellison your resume and cover letter today to<br />

cellison@presleyandpartners.com and discover how good it can get.<br />

Tel: 250-338-1394 / 1-877-338-1394<br />

You’re an experienced CA with<br />

a positive attitude and a good<br />

head on your shoulders. Why<br />

settle <strong>for</strong> a boring job and a<br />

50-hour work week?<br />

www.presleyandpartners.com<br />

opportunity <strong>for</strong> your well-run practice and are interested in transitioning your practice and potentially remaining involved in<br />

an advisory capacity, please <strong>for</strong>ward a summary <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation about your practice to: accountant.victoria@gmail.com.<br />

ACCOUNTING PRACTICES WANTED - NANAIMO AND AREA<br />

We are a well-established, independent, progressive, and growing CA firm on Southern Vancouver Island looking to expand.<br />

We are currently <strong>of</strong>fering merger and succession opportunities and options or will consider the purchase <strong>of</strong> a block <strong>of</strong><br />

accounts. If you are looking to merge your practice to benefit from the depth and opportunities provided by a larger group<br />

<strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals or <strong>for</strong> a retirement/succession opportunity <strong>for</strong> your well-run practice, please <strong>for</strong>ward a summary <strong>of</strong><br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation about your practice to: accountant.nanaimo@gmail.com.<br />

October ’09 ica.bc.ca 29


Ethical Dilemmas<br />

Don’t Abdicate<br />

Your Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Judgment<br />

By Chris Utley, CA<br />

Director <strong>of</strong> Ethics<br />

When in doubt about pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

matters, it’s <strong>of</strong>ten a good idea to<br />

seek legal advice. That said, if the<br />

advice you receive runs contrary to your training<br />

and instincts, you should question its validity.<br />

This is especially true when the advice pertains<br />

to an area that falls within your particular realm<br />

<strong>of</strong> expertise. One such situation recently led to<br />

an investigation into the conduct <strong>of</strong> a CA named<br />

Carol.*<br />

The situation<br />

Carol works as the CFO <strong>of</strong> Control Irrigation<br />

Ltd (CIL), a company that sells and maintains<br />

water sprinkler systems.<br />

Mark, the company’s CEO and majority<br />

shareholder, launched CIL in <strong>BC</strong> in 2000, with<br />

some initial financing help from two associates.<br />

These associates, Alexandra and Bruce, each<br />

loaned the company $200,000 <strong>for</strong> 20% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

shares, becoming CIL’s minority shareholders.<br />

Mark’s lawyer and personal friend, Dave, helped<br />

draw up a shareholders’ agreement, which stipulated<br />

that the two minority shareholders would<br />

be bought out after ten years according to a <strong>for</strong>mula<br />

based on earnings.<br />

By the time Carol joined CIL in 2004, the<br />

company was making pr<strong>of</strong>its. One <strong>of</strong> her first<br />

tasks was to review the shareholders’ agreement to<br />

determine if the terms were fair to the majority<br />

shareholder—Mark. She concluded that the<br />

agreement was unfair to her boss, as it effectively<br />

gave 50% <strong>of</strong> the company to minority shareholders<br />

who owned only 40% <strong>of</strong> the shares.<br />

Mark subsequently attempted to renegotiate<br />

the shareholders’ agreement with the help <strong>of</strong><br />

both Carol and Dave.<br />

What happened<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e renegotiation ef<strong>for</strong>ts could get underway, Alexandra negotiated an early buyout, leaving Bruce<br />

as the sole minority shareholder. Bruce refused to renegotiate, insisting that he be bought out after ten<br />

years, as per the original agreement. Carol and Dave attempted to renegotiate the shareholders’<br />

agreement several times, and provided Bruce with the company’s financial in<strong>for</strong>mation to help him<br />

with his decision (as per his request). When it became clear that Bruce could not be convinced to<br />

renegotiate, Carol stopped providing him with financial in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

By this point—late in 2004—Bruce had been repaid all but $40,000 <strong>of</strong> his investment in CIL. As<br />

part <strong>of</strong> a bank financing agreement Carol had helped CIL arrange earlier in the year, Bruce had signed<br />

a postponement <strong>of</strong> claim on this $40,000, in favour <strong>of</strong> the bank. But when Carol stopped providing<br />

him with financial in<strong>for</strong>mation, Bruce believed he was being shut out and requested repayment. Under<br />

Dave’s advisement, and without objection from Carol, Mark refused.<br />

Bruce filed a lawsuit against CIL <strong>for</strong> repayment <strong>of</strong> his loan plus interest.<br />

Shortly thereafter, the bank became aware <strong>of</strong> the shareholder dispute and put the company on<br />

collection notice. Concerned, Mike asked Carol to repay the bank $40,000 to reduce the outstanding<br />

balance <strong>of</strong> the bank loan. At the same time, Carol in<strong>for</strong>med the bank and Bruce that the company was<br />

releasing Bruce’s postponement <strong>of</strong> claim. Carol further advised Bruce that in reducing the indebtedness<br />

to the bank in exchange <strong>for</strong> Bruce’s pledge <strong>of</strong> security, CIL had repaid him in full.<br />

Bruce contacted the ICA<strong>BC</strong>, accusing Carol <strong>of</strong> having orchestrated the theft <strong>of</strong> his $40,000. In his<br />

complaint, he also said that Carol had signed an affidavit in the lawsuit that contained false and<br />

misleading in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

The outcome<br />

Following an investigation, the PCEC found that Carol had indeed been party to the misappropriation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the loan payable to the minority shareholder, and determined that she had violated Rule 202<br />

(Integrity and Due Care).<br />

The PCEC told Carol that repaying the $40,000 loan to the bank was not equivalent to repaying the<br />

minority shareholder. Carol explained that Dave had devised this plan, and said she’d merely accepted<br />

and carried out his advice. She argued that her responsibilities as CFO were to communicate and/or<br />

account <strong>for</strong> legal positions developed by counsel, and to obtain legal advice where necessary, as she was<br />

not qualified to practise law nor to pass legal judgment on positions taken by competent legal<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. The PCEC disagreed, pointing out that accounting was entirely within her realm <strong>of</strong><br />

expertise, and told Carol she should have seriously questioned Dave’s legal advice in this regard.<br />

Moreover, the PCEC found that Carol had made false statements in her affidavit—statements that<br />

directly contradicted the shareholders’ agreement. Again, Carol pointed to Dave, saying that he had<br />

drafted the affidavit. His strategy, she explained, was to deny the existence <strong>of</strong> the original shareholders’<br />

agreement on the basis that it was so unfair as to be null and void.<br />

The PCEC concluded that Carol had breached Rule 205(a) (Association with False and Misleading<br />

Documents) and Rule 201.1 (Maintenance <strong>of</strong> the Reputation <strong>of</strong> the Pr<strong>of</strong>ession). Carol paid a fine,<br />

accepted a reprimand, and paid the costs <strong>of</strong> the investigation.<br />

The message<br />

Carol let her allegiance to Mark cloud her judgment, leading her to neglect her duty—as CFO—to the<br />

company’s minority shareholder. No matter how unfair she may have deemed the original shareholder<br />

agreement, this did not justify her signing false or misleading statements or failing to properly account<br />

<strong>for</strong> an outstanding loan. In addition, she chose to follow the advice <strong>of</strong> legal counsel even though it<br />

conflicted with her own training and judgment. Why she did so is still unclear.<br />

Comments or questions? Contact me at utley@ica.bc.ca.<br />

*Please note: This fictionalized account is based loosely on an actual case be<strong>for</strong>e the PCEC (Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Conduct Enquiry Committee). Names and circumstances have been changed to preserve anonymity. The<br />

contents <strong>of</strong> this article are intended only <strong>for</strong> the general guidance <strong>of</strong> readers. The PCEC deals with each case<br />

individually, based on its specific facts and circumstances.<br />

30 ica.bc.ca October ’09


Estate Planning can be puzzling<br />

<strong>for</strong> your business clients.<br />

As their CA, you can help.<br />

The Estate Planning Toolkit <strong>for</strong> Business Owners<br />

provides clients with a framework <strong>for</strong> working<br />

with their pr<strong>of</strong>essional advisors to create a viable<br />

plan that protects their future and the future <strong>of</strong><br />

their business and their family.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

• 192 pages with 21 easy-to-read chapters<br />

• practical checklists on an accompanying CD<br />

• illustrative real-life stories highlight key<br />

considerations and options <strong>for</strong> clients’ futures.<br />

CICA_EN_Estate Cover.indd 1<br />

03/07/2009 9:26:36 AM<br />

The Estate Planning Toolkit<br />

<strong>for</strong> Business Owners<br />

To order go to: www.cica.ca/estateplan — $29.95


Helping your clients get the<br />

right financing doesn’t have<br />

to be a bumpy road.<br />

When advising your small- and medium-sized business clients on their financing options, be sure to<br />

give them all <strong>of</strong> their available options. The Financing Toolkit <strong>for</strong> Small and Medium Businesses can<br />

help your clients put their best foot <strong>for</strong>ward by providing alternatives to the traditional financing<br />

options and getting them better prepared to discuss them with you.<br />

The Toolkit will walk them through practical in<strong>for</strong>mation on financing structures,<br />

drafting a business plan, and case studies based on real-world experiences. The<br />

accompanying CD includes checklists and worksheets to help clients analyze their<br />

financing needs and prepare to take the necessary steps with greater confidence.<br />

Special discount on packages <strong>of</strong> 5 or more.<br />

Sponsored by the<br />

Business Development Bank <strong>of</strong> Canada<br />

To order, visit knotia.ca/store/financing or call<br />

416-977-0748 (Toronto) or 1-800-268-3793 (Toll Free)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!