Untitled - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - Unesp

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REFERENCES ANASB (Italian Buffalo Breeders’ Association), 2009. Statistical data. ANASB (Italian Buffalo Breeders’ Association), 2011. Statistical data. Alexiev, A. 1979. A breeding program for improvement of the native Bulgarian buffalo on dairy direction. Professor Thesis, Sofia, 396 (Bg). Alexiev, A., K. Vankov and TZ. Peeva. 1991.Estimation of the breeding value of buffalo cows, In: Proceedings of the Third World Buffalo Congress Vol.VI,pp. 46-49, 13-17 May, Varna, Bulgaria. Alexiev, 1998 The Water Buffalo. St. Kliment Ohsridski University Press. Coletta A. and C. Caso. 2008. Milk recording. In “Milking Management of Dairy Buffaloes”, Ed. Rasmussen M.D., Thomas S., Borghese A., International Dairy Federation, Bulletin 426: 101-104. Barile V.L., C. Pacelli, C. Palocci, M. Maschio, E. Sabia, A. Borghese and C. Tripaldi. 2010. Effects of differnt diets on milk yield and quality of lactating buffaloes: maize vs sorghum silage. Note II. Proc. 9th World Buffalo Congress, Buenos Aires, 25-28 April. In “Revista Veterinaria” 21 (1): 659-656. Borghese A., V.L. Barile, G. Ficco, A. Galasso, E. Marchiori and G.M. Terzano, 1997. Feeding system effect on reproduction performances in buffalo heifers. Proceed. 5th World Buffalo Congress Caserta, Italy, Oct. 13-16: 697-701. Borghese A., 2005. Buffalo Production and Research. FAO Ed. REU Technical Series 67: 1-315. Borghese A., 2010. Development and perspective of buffalo and buffalo market in Europe and Near East. Proc. 9th World Buffalo Congress Buenos Aires, 25-28 April. In “Revista Veterinaria” 21 (1): 20-31. Borghese A., 2011. Buffalo and its importance in human food sustainability in the world. IX Encontro Brasileiro de Bubalinocultores Santarem, Parà, Brazil, Sept. 11-14. Borghese A., 2012.Bufali a rischio in Romania. L’Allevatore Mag. 68(4):44-46. Cockrill W.R., 1974. The Husbandry and Health of the Domestic Buffalo. Ed. FAO, Rome. Dimov, K. and T.Z. Peeva. 1994. Study of the fattening capability of calves fattened on different liveweight., In: Proceeding of the IVth World Buffalo Congress Vol.2, pp.73 – 75, Sao Paulo, Brazil, June, 27-30. FAO, 2010, FAOSTAT (http://faostat,fao,org/default aspx) Guglielmetti A., 2007. 5 th German Buffalo Day. Buffalo Newsletter 22:2-4. Guglielmetti A. and M. Golze. 2009. International buffalo Experts Met with buffalo breeders in Germany. Buffalo Newsletter 24:59. Ilieva Y., T.Z. Peeva. 2007. Productive life in buffalo cows and effect of some factors on it. Proceedings 8 th World buffalo Congress, Caserta, Oct., 19-22. It. J. Animal Sci. 6, Supp.2:375-377. Jacobi M., 2011. Situation of buffalo in Ukraine. SAVE Intern. Workshop on Conservation of Autochthonous Buffalo, Sighisoara, Romania, May 6-7. Karpati L., 1997. Buffaloes in Hungary. Buffalo Newsletter 7:8,9. Kazoglou Y., D. Patousis and E. Komminou. 2011. Overview of the current status of the water buffalo population in Greece. SAVE Intern. Workshop on Conservation of Autochthonous Buffalo, Sighisoara, Romania, May 6-7. Ligda C., 2009. Personal communication. Moioli B.; 2005. Breeding and selection of dairy buffaloes. In “Buffalo Production and Research. FAO and A. Borghese Ed. REU Technical Series 67: 41-50.” Papa L. and K. Kume, 2011. The Albanian buffalo: a case study of a successful in situ conservation program. SAVE Intern. Workshop on Conservation of Autochthonous Buffalo, Sighisoara, Romania, May 6-7. Peeva, T., 2000. Optimized selection methods in buffaloes, Thesis D. Sc., pp.320 (Bg). Peeva, T. and Y. Ilieva, 2007. Longevity of buffalo cows and reasons for their culling. Proceedings 8 th World buffalo Congress, Caserta, Oct., 19-22. It. J. Animal Sci. 6, Supp.2:378-380.
SAVE Foundation, 2011. Intern. Workshop Conservation Autochthonous Buffalo, Sighisoara, Romania, May 6-7. Buffalo Newsletter 26:4-10. Stojanovic S., 2011. Status of water buffalo in Serbia. SAVE Intern. Workshop on Conservation of Autochthonous Buffalo, Sighisoara, Romania, May 6-7. Thiele M., 2009. Personal communication. Vidu L., 2010. Personal communication. Wood F., 2009. Personal communication.
Page 2 and 3: Control of buffalo follicular dynam
Page 4 and 5: multiparous), and period of the yea
Page 6 and 7: (Gasparrini, 2002). Some studies in
Page 8 and 9: Table 1. Effect of genetic group (N
Page 10 and 11: Baruselli, P.S., N.A.T. Carvalho, M
Page 12 and 13: Gimenes, L.U., P. Fantinato Neto, J
Page 14 and 15: Saliba, W.P., R.M. Drummond, H.X.S.
Page 16 and 17: uffalo enrolled in Genealogical Boo
Page 18 and 19: Figure 2. Mozzarella and the colour
Page 20 and 21: Figure 4. Recorded Buffaloes in the
Page 22 and 23: Figure 5. Extensive system: calf wi
Page 24 and 25: Figure 9. Calves managed in box. Fi
Page 26 and 27: Figure 11. Milk processing and mozz
Page 28 and 29: Figure 15. Rump of young bull with
Page 30 and 31: previous owners and their relations
Page 32 and 33: 3. BULGARIA The mechanization enter
Page 34 and 35: Figure 21. Bulgarian Murrah herd (A
Page 36 and 37: Figure 24. Mediterranean buffalo yo
Page 38 and 39: iodiversity, to conserve buffalo ge
Page 40 and 41: Figure 30. Simple cheese in Mojanci
Page 42 and 43: Figure 31. Mediterranean Serbian co
Page 44 and 45: 10. HUNGARY A small but tenacious p
Page 48 and 49: Lactation Curve and Milk Flow Anton
Page 50 and 51: Figure 2. Effect of parity on lacta
Page 52 and 53: Figures 5. Typical milk flow curve
Page 54 and 55: Figure 9 (up-left), 10 (upright), 1
Page 56 and 57: Figure 17. Milking with a double pr
Page 58 and 59: Figure 23. Milk flow curve at quart
Page 60 and 61: kPa showed the best milkability con
Page 62 and 63: Pazzona, A., 1989. The effect of th
Page 64 and 65: The interest in developing the alre
Page 66 and 67: particularly true for those who hav
Page 68 and 69: Table 4. Recorded introduction of R
Page 70 and 71: collaborations may be classified in
Page 72 and 73: Gene Pools for Selected Native Phil
Page 74 and 75: Two approaches are being introduced
Page 76 and 77: Privatization of Artificial Insemin
Page 78 and 79: For the first two years, VBAIT rece
Page 80 and 81: Even at the early period of program
Page 82 and 83: Nutritional and Other Management Pr
Page 84 and 85: will certainly prolong the reproduc
Page 86 and 87: CONCLUSIONS An ever increasing amou
Page 88 and 89: Om Prakash DHANDA * Changing Dynami
Page 90 and 91: Semi-Intensive Buffalo Production S
Page 92 and 93: food security of farmers due to the
Page 94 and 95: In vitro embryo production in buffa
Page 96 and 97:
cleavage rates (Totey et al., 1992)
Page 98 and 99:
Boni, R., R. Di Palo, V. Barbieri a
Page 100 and 101:
Buffalo Milk Cheese Mohamed HOFI a*
Page 102 and 103:
REFERENCES Abou-Donia, S.A., 1986.
Page 104 and 105:
Table: 2. Selected approaches explo
Page 106 and 107:
Keywords: water buffalo, karyotype,
Page 108 and 109:
species is the smallest buffalo in
Page 110 and 111:
genetic information from richer gen
Page 112 and 113:
Iannuzzi L., G.P. Di Meo, A. Peruca
Page 114 and 115:
Figure 3. Internal sex adducts in a
Page 116 and 117:
Sperm Sexing in Buffalo Using Flow
Page 118 and 119:
Table 1. The mean±S.D. (n = 6) per
Page 120 and 121:
___________________________________
Page 122 and 123:
Liucheng 173 74 (42.8) 72 (97.3) To
Page 124 and 125:
Effect of use Pre-Synch + Ovsynch p
Page 126 and 127:
present an average conception rate
Page 128 and 129:
Figure 1 Trends of numbers of buffa
Page 130 and 131:
4) public relation and promotion of
Page 132 and 133:
Social aspects 1) Make the communit
Page 134 and 135:
which dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO), gl
Page 136 and 137:
REFERENCES Attanasio L., A.D. Rosa,
Page 138 and 139:
trehalose Straw:40%EG+5% 2min+0.075
Page 140 and 141:
efficiently utilize poor quality fe
Page 142 and 143:
Table 2. Worldwide buffalo milk (wh
Page 144 and 145:
production improvements through bet
Page 146 and 147:
evealed that total weight gain, ave
Page 148 and 149:
animals kept at National Agricultur
Page 150 and 151:
acids, control diet plus 320 gm of
Page 152 and 153:
Drost, M. 2007. Bubaline versus bov
Page 154 and 155:
Wanapat, M. 2004. On-farm crop-resi
Page 156 and 157:
(Gagliostro, 2004). The transformat
Page 158 and 159:
ISO 15304. 2002. Animal and vegetab
Page 160 and 161:
Breeding value Breeding value on th
Page 162 and 163:
type and conformation are more subs
Page 164 and 165:
5. Calving interval, days 420 6. In
Page 166 and 167:
monitored and confronted. Until few
Page 168 and 169:
showing that this new approach in t
Page 170 and 171:
following AI with sexed semen. Repr
Page 172 and 173:
The major export of meat is buffalo
Page 174 and 175:
DISCUSSIONS The Murrah and murrah g
Page 176 and 177:
Packing material QC Inspection Tabl
Page 178 and 179:
2003-04 5,898,000 1,443,000 338,940
Page 180 and 181:
Algeria 0 0 0 2,891 5,775 U.A.E. 2,
Page 182 and 183:
Kg. weeks Rs. Rs. Trial 1 94 20529
Page 184 and 185:
60% to the total milch cattle popul
Page 186 and 187:
accounts for about 25% of the total
Page 188 and 189:
Table 3. Trend of improvement in ag
Page 190 and 191:
for normal ovarian functions. PPAR
Page 192 and 193:
synthetic ligands of PPARγ upregul
Page 194 and 195:
Figure 2. Possible direct molecular
Page 196 and 197:
independent. Fig. 3 Collaborative c
Page 198 and 199:
Fan, W., T. Yanase, H. Morinaga, Y.
Page 200 and 201:
Sundvold, H., A. Brzozowska and S.
Page 202 and 203:
North part of central Anatolia rela
Page 204 and 205:
conservation and incentive premium
Page 206 and 207:
Soysal, M.İ., S. Kök, 1997. Ergin
Page 208 and 209:
Table 1. Means and standard errors
Page 210 and 211:
Table 3. Means and standard errors
Page 212 and 213:
Table.4. Several Characteristics ab
Page 214 and 215:
Table.4. Several Characteristics ab
Page 216 and 217:
Table 5. Mean, standard deviation a
Page 218 and 219:
Table 7. Preliminary data on Milk c
Page 220 and 221:
Tokat Samsun Table 10. Distribution
Page 222 and 223:
Tokat Table 10. Distribution male w
Page 224 and 225:
Table 12. Number of water buffaloe
Page 226 and 227:
Some of result in Anatolian water b
Page 228 and 229:
India. Buffaloes in India have a pl
Page 230 and 231:
Agricultural Research] and SAUs [St
Page 232 and 233:
Under the in-situ conservation sche
Page 234 and 235:
Table 3. Description of important b
Page 236 and 237:
Australia at 53%. Generally buffalo
Page 238 and 239:
21% 29% 50% Figure 1. Classificatio
Page 240 and 241:
Buffalo is a precious animal geneti
Page 242 and 243:
Church and include a group of catec
Page 244 and 245:
than in cattle, where regional meat
Page 246 and 247:
Figure 1. The sseasonal variation i
Page 248 and 249:
Exogenous fibrolytic enzymes: Role
Page 250 and 251:
EFFECTS OF EXOGENOUS ENZYMES ON RUM
Page 252 and 253:
Hristov, A.N., McAllister, T.A. and
Page 254 and 255:
Table 4. Per cent apparent, true DM
Page 256 and 257:
the year 2000 and is expected to be
Page 258 and 259:
increased. The buffalo production s
Page 260 and 261:
Table 3. Typical composition of buf
Page 262 and 263:
Sector Italy this increase in the n
Page 264 and 265:
Figure 2. Rumen fermentation throug
Page 266 and 267:
asal roughage, as it resulted in in
Page 268 and 269:
BUFFALO RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND ED
Page 270 and 271:
Kumar, A., Tiwari, G.N., Kumar, S.
Page 272 and 273:
Brief Introduction to the Developme
Page 274 and 275:
Reproductive biotechnologies accele
Page 276 and 277:
543.3kg in 2011 (Fig. 2) with the a
Page 278 and 279:
the orchards, pasture grass, buffal
Page 280 and 281:
Table 2. Average annual yield per b
Page 282 and 283:
INTRODUCTION Buffaloes in America h
Page 284 and 285:
Murrah breed and its crosses, and 2
Page 286 and 287:
1.672 litres (maximum 2.600 litres)
show all

Untitled - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - Unesp

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?