08.11.2014 Views

Social Watch Report 2009

Social Watch Report 2009

Social Watch Report 2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

angladesh<br />

More poverty, vulnerability and food insecurity<br />

Poverty, vulnerability and food insecurity have increased in Bangladesh. The high price of food grains<br />

and the high level of inflation have led an additional 12.1 million people into poverty. There is increased<br />

frequency and severity of natural disasters. Two consecutive floods, plus Cyclone Sidr, together with<br />

the global price of food have led to food supply problems. It is the poorest and the female-headed<br />

households who are worst hit by the hike in prices for basic goods.<br />

Unnayan Shamannay<br />

Taifur Rahman<br />

Arifur Rahman<br />

100<br />

Basic Capabilities Index (BCI)<br />

100<br />

BCI = 56 GEI = 53<br />

Children reaching<br />

5th grade<br />

55<br />

Gender Equity Index (GEI)<br />

Empowerment<br />

Since its independence in 1971, Bangladesh pursued<br />

an inward looking development strategy with<br />

19<br />

excessive government intervention in every aspect of<br />

0 6<br />

0<br />

0<br />

economic activity. With the vision of a socialist type<br />

of agriculture, cooperative farming was encouraged<br />

20<br />

34<br />

99<br />

93<br />

while the procurement and distribution of seed, fertilizers,<br />

pesticides and all sorts of agricultural 98equip-<br />

Births attended by<br />

54<br />

100 100 100<br />

100 100<br />

100 100<br />

86<br />

ment was controlled by the Government. A series of skilled health personnel<br />

Survival up to 5 Economic activity<br />

Education<br />

measures, quantitative IEG restrictions, of Bahrain highly = 46 differen-<br />

BCI of Bangladesh = 56<br />

IEG of Bangladesh = 52,7<br />

tiated tariff rates (ranging from 0% to 400%), and<br />

huge subsidies, along with an overvalued exchange<br />

rate, were put in place to protect domestic farms<br />

from competition. This restrictive environment was<br />

reinforced by domestic market policy interventions<br />

in the form of credit ceilings, 100 arbitrary licensing and<br />

which translated into sectoral policies that supported<br />

macroeconomic liberalization. Reform measures<br />

adopted included the rationalization of tariffs, the<br />

liberalization of investment in irrigation, the privatization<br />

of trade in fertilizers, agricultural machinery imports,<br />

seed delivery and 100food distribution systems,<br />

98<br />

price controls.<br />

as well as management of agricultural research and<br />

These policies did not result in a sustained extension systems. Moreover, reforms in farming<br />

increase of production and productive efficiency; led to a shrinking role of the Government; this was<br />

on the contrary, the gap between 29 demand for and reflected in the distribution of goods, the reduction of<br />

supply of agricultural products widened over the subsidies, the liberalization of markets with producers’<br />

price incentives, the gradual elimination and nar-<br />

0<br />

0<br />

years. To find a way out of this crisis in the 1980s,<br />

the country pursued a policy shift away from state rowing down of the public grain distribution system,<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

interventionism to more market -oriented policies price stabilization through open tender procurement<br />

100 100 68<br />

100<br />

100 100<br />

98<br />

policies and the liberalization of food grain imports<br />

by the private sector.<br />

The liberalization efforts were not confined to<br />

the agricultural sector. The whole economy began<br />

to go through all-out liberalization, particularly after<br />

the early 1990s, and became 100 one of the most rapidly<br />

liberalized in the world. Although some claim that<br />

this was done too rapidly, the World Bank observed,<br />

“While trade liberalization occurred in fits and starts<br />

43<br />

in Bangladesh, stronger and more decisive commitment<br />

to trade liberalization was seen in the majority<br />

0<br />

of the rest of the world. As a result Bangladesh lags<br />

behind on most measures of trade openness. Even<br />

after the reduction in nominal protection in the financial<br />

year 2007 budget, Bangladesh has the 97 highest<br />

100<br />

64<br />

100<br />

100<br />

CHART 1.<br />

level of trade protection in the region, which itself is<br />

BCI of<br />

the most trade restrictive IEG of Czech region Rep. in the = 68,1 world”. 1<br />

IEG of Cyprus = 65,1<br />

República Checa = 99,2<br />

Despite mounting pressure for more liberalization,<br />

Global<br />

Price Crisis<br />

Climate<br />

Change<br />

Global<br />

Financial Crisis<br />

the results of past liberalization measures must<br />

also be assessed. Did common people benefit from<br />

the process of liberalization or were the only beneficiaries<br />

some booming multinational giants? One<br />

Global<br />

Increased frequency<br />

Reduced flow<br />

of the major consequences of the all-out reforms<br />

food price 100increase<br />

and severity of<br />

100<br />

100<br />

of remittances<br />

natural disasters<br />

has been increased dependency on imports, including<br />

agricultural products. As a result, despite being<br />

81<br />

an agricultural nation, the country has been losing<br />

control of the prices of many ordinary products that<br />

0<br />

Shortage of<br />

Reduced<br />

people need every day.<br />

8<br />

food supply<br />

purchasing 0<br />

0<br />

capacity<br />

The impact of the<br />

NO<br />

global<br />

VA0<br />

crises<br />

92<br />

37<br />

89 95 The diagram in the opposite page illustrates the 99<br />

100 100 78 100<br />

100 100<br />

100 100<br />

100<br />

impact of the inter-related global crises in climate<br />

Increased<br />

food insecurity, poverty<br />

change, commodity prices and economic and financial<br />

IEG of India = 40,7<br />

and vulnerability<br />

BCI of Irak = 88,4<br />

crises on poverty and food insecurity.<br />

IEG of Iraq = 0<br />

100<br />

100<br />

7<br />

7<br />

Source: falta fuente falta fuente falta fuente!!!!<br />

1 World Bank. Bangladesh: Strategy for Sustained Growth,<br />

Bangladesh Development Series, 2007.<br />

National reports 56 <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Watch</strong><br />

100 100<br />

100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!