09.11.2014 Views

The Circular Economy - 2013 Report - State of Texas Alliance for ...

The Circular Economy - 2013 Report - State of Texas Alliance for ...

The Circular Economy - 2013 Report - State of Texas Alliance for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

68 | TOWARDS THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY<br />

3. How it works up close<br />

Continued<br />

139 Interview with Peter<br />

Koegler, Senior Manager<br />

Environmental Value, SABMiller<br />

140 Interview with Peter<br />

Koegler, Senior Manager<br />

Environmental Value, SABMiller<br />

141 Interview with Dr Klaus<br />

Stadler, Director Environment<br />

& Water Resources Europe, <strong>The</strong><br />

Coca Cola Company<br />

142 Coca Cola micro distribution<br />

model- Coca-Cola website<br />

‘How Coca Cola is helping<br />

entrepreneurs in Africa to<br />

set up their own businesses<br />

http://www.coca-cola.co.uk/<br />

community/micro-distributioncentres.html<br />

143 Canadean beer report 2012<br />

144 Growth <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t drinks in<br />

Western Europe between<br />

2001 and 2010 was 14% <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>f-trade and only 6% growth<br />

<strong>for</strong> on-trade, while <strong>for</strong> beer the<br />

difference was even greater:<br />

24% <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-trade and only 5%<br />

<strong>for</strong> on-trade; Euromonitor value<br />

sales, 2001-2010<br />

145 Interview with Jon Wilde,<br />

Global Packaging Sustainability<br />

Manager, Trinity Procurement<br />

GmbH, subsidiary <strong>of</strong> SABMiller<br />

plc, December 2012<br />

146 Assumptions include 30<br />

reuses per bottle, 95% return<br />

rate, 34% weight increase <strong>for</strong><br />

reusable vs. one-way, 300<br />

km average road miles from<br />

brewery to store and vice versa,<br />

USD 1.73/km transport costs,<br />

1.14 reusable bottles required<br />

<strong>for</strong> each single-use bottle<br />

(bottle float requirement),<br />

USD 0.79 retailer handling<br />

costs per bottle<br />

147 SABMiller carbon-intensity<br />

sensitivity analysis, July<br />

2012, shows that returnable<br />

bottles deliver lower CO 2 e<br />

than PET, cans, and one-way<br />

glass bottles (not publicly<br />

available in<strong>for</strong>mation);<br />

PricewaterhouseCoopers,<br />

‘Reuse and Recycling Systems<br />

<strong>for</strong> Selected Beverage<br />

Packaging from a Sustainability<br />

Perspective’, 2011, determined<br />

that unless transport distances<br />

exceed 600 km, reusables<br />

are more pr<strong>of</strong>itable and<br />

environmentally beneficial than<br />

one-way; <strong>The</strong> Beverage Industry<br />

Environmental Roundtable,<br />

June 2012, concluded that<br />

returnable bottles accounted<br />

<strong>for</strong> 13% <strong>of</strong> total footprint,<br />

versus 65% <strong>of</strong> total footprint<br />

<strong>for</strong> one-way bottles.<br />

What works well today?<br />

<strong>Circular</strong> business models are in use today and<br />

deliver lower costs <strong>for</strong> manufacturers and<br />

consumers in both emerging markets and<br />

in ultramodern high-volume operations. In<br />

many markets, beverages are sold in refillable<br />

packaging, mainly glass. Depending on the<br />

market environment, refillables are a preferred<br />

packaging solution <strong>for</strong> many beverage<br />

manufacturers due to their generally lower<br />

carbon footprint and higher pr<strong>of</strong>it margins<br />

when compared to one-way packaging. 139<br />

47% <strong>of</strong> SABMiller’s current global business<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, is in refillable bottles. 140 This is<br />

driven not only by the emerging markets <strong>of</strong><br />

Africa, Latin American and Asian, but also by<br />

European markets.<br />

<strong>The</strong> success <strong>of</strong> reuse schemes relies on a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> factors. First <strong>of</strong> all, a high cost <strong>of</strong><br />

raw materials relative to other input costs<br />

encourages reuse as new materials are not<br />

required every time a beverage is consumed.<br />

Coca-Cola is typically able to cycle its glass<br />

bottles 35 – 45 times. 141 A second factor<br />

is low-cost collection and redistribution<br />

infrastructure, typically built on either efficient<br />

back-hauling in developed economies, or on<br />

low-cost labour and relatively short transport<br />

distances in traditional retail markets. 142<br />

MYTH<br />

Consumer goods companies prefer to<br />

make large volumes <strong>of</strong> products in oneway<br />

packaging, selling them directly<br />

through big supermarkets<br />

Reality: Some consumer goods<br />

companies would much rather use<br />

returnable packaging; they make<br />

money, save more material and have a<br />

lower total carbon footprint<br />

Gabor Garamszegi, SVP Corporate<br />

Affairs <strong>for</strong> SABMiller Europe, says: ‘We<br />

would generally prefer reusable glass<br />

bottles from both a cost perspective, as<br />

they may provide better margins, and a<br />

sustainability angle, given the material<br />

savings and associated lower carbon<br />

footprint [vs. one-way bottles]’<br />

Previous investment in reuse infrastructure<br />

and the relatively low bargaining power <strong>of</strong><br />

retailers, who tend to prefer the simplicity <strong>of</strong><br />

one-way containers, are also factors likely to<br />

promote reuse systems. Finally, it also helps<br />

to have relatively undifferentiated packaging<br />

types (<strong>of</strong>ten with the same package used<br />

across different brands), as this reduces<br />

handling and processing costs <strong>of</strong> used bottles<br />

<strong>for</strong> both retailers and manufacturers.<br />

In order to maximise the use <strong>of</strong> every bottle,<br />

high collection rates are required. In emerging<br />

markets, the relative value <strong>of</strong> the bottles<br />

provides a sufficient incentive <strong>for</strong> collection,<br />

further enabled by greater consumption <strong>of</strong><br />

beverages on premises where vendors can<br />

retain possession <strong>of</strong> the bottles. In Africa, <strong>for</strong><br />

instance, over 80% <strong>of</strong> beer is consumed on<br />

premises. 143 In developed markets, refillable<br />

systems are well established in high-volume,<br />

on-trade food and beverage settings where<br />

collection can be ensured (e.g., bars and<br />

restaurants with supply chains <strong>for</strong> reusable<br />

beer kegs and local brewer-bottled beer).<br />

While recent trends in developed markets<br />

have seen a significant move to consumption<br />

away from bars and restaurants <strong>for</strong> both beer<br />

and s<strong>of</strong>t drinks, 144 opportunities still<br />

exist in the on-trade <strong>for</strong> companies to<br />

provide a better product experience and<br />

higher value <strong>for</strong> consumers via a closed-loop<br />

collection system. 145<br />

Expanding these solutions more widely<br />

represents an opportunity <strong>for</strong> manufacturers,<br />

distributors and collectors, and consumers.<br />

This can be illustrated by the case <strong>for</strong> reusable<br />

beer packaging (Figure 18). Our modelling<br />

<strong>of</strong> beer containers shows that shifting from<br />

a model <strong>of</strong> one-way glass to reusable glass<br />

beverage packaging would lower the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

the packaging and all associated processing<br />

and distribution by approximately 20% per<br />

hectolitre <strong>of</strong> beer sold to consumers. 146 It has<br />

also been shown in various recent studies<br />

that not only can refillable bottles deliver<br />

a higher pr<strong>of</strong>it than one-way alternatives,<br />

they also have a considerably lower carbon<br />

(CO2e) footprint. 147 Although refillables are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten resisted by retailers, some studies<br />

have shown higher footfall due to providing<br />

collection facilities <strong>for</strong> used bottles, and even<br />

higher basket spend per trip due to capturing<br />

consumers on their bigger shopping<br />

trips (e.g., superstore chosen <strong>for</strong> weekly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!