EQUIP2 Final Report.pdf - Education Policy Data Center

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EQUIP2: Educational Policy, Systems Development, and Management is one of three USAID-funded Leader with Associates Cooperative Agreements under the umbrella heading Educational Quality Improvement Program (EQUIP). As a Leader with Associates mechanism, EQUIP2 accommodates buy-in awards from USAID bureaus and missions to support the goal of building education quality at the national, sub-national, and cross-community levels. FHI 360 is the lead organization for the global EQUIP2 partnership of education and development organizations, universities, and research institutions. The partnership includes fifteen major organizations and an expanding network of regional and national associates throughout the world: Aga Khan Foundation, American Institutes for Research, CARE, Center for Collaboration and the Future of Schooling, East-West Center, Education Development Center, International Rescue Committee, Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation, Michigan State University, Mississippi Consortium for International Development, ORC Macro, Research Triangle Institute, University of Minnesota, University of Pittsburgh Institute of International Studies in Education, Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children.
EQUIP2 Leader Award Final Report Nine years of experience in education policy, systems, and management. Anne Smiley, Ed.D. 2012 This paper was made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Cooperative Agreement No. GDG-A-00-03-00008-00. The contents are the responsibility of FHI 360 through the Educational Quality Improvement Program 2 (EQUIP2) and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
Page 1: Educational Quality Improvement Pro
Page 7 and 8: Introduction 1 At the EQUIP end-of-
Page 9: 3 Introduction
Page 12 and 13: 6 EQUIP2 Leader Award Final Report
Page 17 and 18: The Research: Evidence, Application
Page 19 and 20: USAID requested a major retrospecti
Page 21 and 22: were 35,500 BRAC schools with an en
Page 23 and 24: In 2007, a congruence of three fact
Page 25 and 26: education policy expert team feel t
Page 27 and 28: impact on, influence of, and relati
Page 29 and 30: Meta-Evaluation of USAID Basic Educ
Page 31 and 32: continued to build, the team decide
Page 33 and 34: the conditions that allowed educati
Page 35 and 36: Thus, at USAID’s request, EQUIP2
Page 37: Nonetheless, EQUIP2’s work on Opp
Page 40 and 41: 34 the EQUIP mechanism as a useful
Page 44 and 45: 38 outcomes. Without consistent, su
Page 47 and 48: Annex: EQUIP2 Associate Awards DJIB
Page 49 and 50: ased support focused on improving t
Page 51 and 52: EL SALVADOR: STRENGTHENING BASIC ED
Page 53 and 54:
and Training Board (KETB) members,
Page 55 and 56:
and Research with EMIS, research st
Page 57 and 58:
debates in the education developmen
Page 59 and 60:
The Guatemala Social Sector Investm
Page 61 and 62:
The MIDEH project established allia
Page 63 and 64:
curriculum and instructional regime
Page 65 and 66:
LIBERIA: TEACHER TRAINING PROGRAM I
Page 67 and 68:
LIBERIA: TEACHER TRAINING PROGRAM 2
Page 69 and 70:
of the Education Sector Plan was co
Page 71 and 72:
to fulfill their designated mission
Page 73 and 74:
ensure the adoption of new ways of
Page 75 and 76:
of major accomplishments. Coordinat
Page 77 and 78:
Although the HEC-FAD program was sc
Page 79 and 80:
and encourage community stewardship
Page 81 and 82:
SOUTHERN SUDAN: TECHNICAL ASSISTANC
Page 83 and 84:
UGANDA: EVALUATION OF TEACHER DEVEL
Page 85 and 86:
• Completion of Wide Area Network
Page 87 and 88:
The project targeted four instituti
Page 89:
83 Annex: EQUIP2 Associate Awards
show all

EQUIP2 Final Report.pdf - Education Policy Data Center

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?