CHAPTER 1 – Project Description - Government of Himachal Pradesh
CHAPTER 1 – Project Description - Government of Himachal Pradesh
CHAPTER 1 – Project Description - Government of Himachal Pradesh
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> Road and Other Infrastructure<br />
Development Corporation Ltd.<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Resettlement Action Plan Phase I<br />
January 2007<br />
Submitted By:<br />
Louis Berger Group, Inc., USA<br />
2300 N Street, NW Washington, D.C.<br />
20037, USA<br />
South Asia Office: Plot 41, Sector 18, Maruti<br />
Industrial Area, Gurgaon- 122015, Haryana, India<br />
Submitted To:<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Director - State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> Road and Other<br />
Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.<br />
(HPRIDC)<br />
New Himrus Building,<br />
Circular Road, Shimla – 171001, India
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 1 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................. 24<br />
1.1. GENERAL ..................................................................................................24<br />
1.2. ROADS INCLUDED IN THE STUDY .................................................................25<br />
1.3. PROJECT OBJECTIVES ................................................................................28<br />
1.4. PROJECT COMPONENTS.............................................................................28<br />
1.5. NEED FOR RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN ......................................................29<br />
1.5.1. Objectives <strong>of</strong> Resettlement Action Plan .................................................................................. 29<br />
1.6. THE REPORT ..............................................................................................29<br />
1.7. SCOPE OF THE RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN ................................................30<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 2: STUDY METHODOLOGY .................................................. 32<br />
2.1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................32<br />
2.2 RESETTLEMENT PLAN PREPARATION PROCESS ................................................32<br />
2.3 TOOLS USED FOR THE STUDY........................................................................34<br />
2.4 CONSULTATION METHODOLOGY..................................................................34<br />
2.4.1. Local Level Consultation..................................................................................................................35<br />
2.4.2. District Level Consultation................................................................................................................35<br />
2.4.3. State Level Consultation ..................................................................................................................36<br />
2.4.4. Collection <strong>of</strong> Data from Secondary Sources:................................................................................36<br />
2.5. BYPASS/ REALIGNMENTS AND IDENTIFICATION OF AFFECTED PERSONS ..........36<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 3 - R & R PRINCIPLES, POLICY FRAME WORK AND ENTITLEMENT<br />
MATRIX ........................................................................................................ 37<br />
3.1. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING REGULATIONS:.........................................................37<br />
3.1.1. Land Acquisition Act 1894 ...............................................................................................................37<br />
3.1.2. National Policy on Resettlement and Rehabilitation....................................................................38<br />
3.2. WORLD BANK REQUIREMENT.......................................................................39<br />
3.3. THE NEED FOR SEPARATE POLICY:...............................................................40<br />
3.4. BROAD PRINCIPLES OF THE HPSRP R&R POLICY............................................40<br />
3.4.1. Broad Principles ................................................................................................................................40<br />
3.4.2. Entitlement Matrix .............................................................................................................................41<br />
3.5. LAND ACQUISITION PROCESS.....................................................................48<br />
3.5.1. Steps to be followed for Private Negotiations ...............................................................................49<br />
3.5.2. District land Price Fixation Committee (DLPFC).............................................................................50<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 4 - PROJECT IMPACT AND LAND ACQUISITION IMPACT ....... 51<br />
4.1. CENSUS AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY ANALYSIS.....................................51<br />
4.2. OBJECTIVES OF THE CENSUS AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEYS.....................51<br />
4.3. ANALYSIS OF THE SURVEY...........................................................................51<br />
4.3.1. Analysis <strong>of</strong> Census and Baseline socio-economic Data...............................................................52<br />
4.4. ANALYSIS OF I MPACT ON STRUCTURE .................................................................... 57<br />
4.5. NEED FOR DATA UP-DATE...........................................................................60<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 1
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
4.6. LAND ACQUISITION ESTIMATE .....................................................................60<br />
4.7. TYPE OF COMMON PROPERTY LOST ............................................................62<br />
4.8 OPINION AND AWARENESS ABOUT THE PROJECT ..........................................63<br />
4.9. RESETTLEMENT OPTIONS .............................................................................64<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 5 - IMPACT ON WOMEN AND OTHER VULNERABLE GROUPS.. 66<br />
5.1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 66<br />
5.2. WOMEN HEADED HOUSEHOLDS .................................................................... 66<br />
5.2.1. Demographic and other key Characteristic <strong>of</strong> Affected Women..............................................67<br />
5.2.2. Literacy Level among Affected Women members ......................................................................67<br />
5.2.3. Occupation pattern among Affected Women members...........................................................68<br />
5.2.4. Vulnerability among Affected Women members.........................................................................68<br />
5.3. IMPACT OF DISPLACEMENT ON WOMAN....................................................... 69<br />
5.4. WOMEN'S ROLE IN HOUSEHOLD ECONOMY .................................................. 69<br />
5.5. TIME DISPOSITION BY WOMEN ...................................................................... 70<br />
5.6. IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES ON WOMEN ................................... 70<br />
5.7. PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN IN THE PROJECT ................................................ 70<br />
5.8. WOMEN INVOLVEMENT IN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ...................................... 70<br />
5.9. INVOLVEMENT OF WOMEN IN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ............................. 72<br />
5.9.1. Specific Provision for Women in the construction camp..............................................................72<br />
5.10. OTHER VULNERABLE FAMILIES ..................................................................... 74<br />
5.11. MEASURES FOR INCOME RESTORATION AND UP-LIFTMENT OF VULNERABLE<br />
PEOPLE .............................................................................................................. 75<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 6 - MINIMIZING SOCIAL IMPACT AND POVERTY .................. 78<br />
6.1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 78<br />
6.2. DESIGN AND R&R CO-ORDINATION.............................................................. 78<br />
6.3. OVER ALL IMPACT OF THE PROJECT ............................................................. 78<br />
6.4. THE NEED FOR MINIMIZATION OF IMPACT ..................................................... 79<br />
6.5. MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE NEGATIVE SOCIAL IMPACTS .......................... 79<br />
6.5.1. Delineation <strong>of</strong> CoI ............................................................................................................................79<br />
6.5.2. Concentric Widening.......................................................................................................................80<br />
6.5.3. Provisions <strong>of</strong> Covered Drainage......................................................................................................80<br />
6.5.4. Provision <strong>of</strong> Toe Wall/retaining wall ................................................................................................80<br />
6.5.5. Specific protection to save structures on uphill.............................................................................82<br />
6.5.6. Provision <strong>of</strong> Bypasses ........................................................................................................................84<br />
6.5.7. Reduction <strong>of</strong> Speed .........................................................................................................................85<br />
6.5.8. Alternatives Considered ..................................................................................................................85<br />
6.6 PROJECT BENEFITS ........................................................................................ 86<br />
6.6.1. Realignment:.....................................................................................................................................87<br />
6.6.2. Rain Shelter & Bus Bay: .....................................................................................................................87<br />
6.6.3. Intersection Improvement ...............................................................................................................88<br />
6.7. POVERTY ASSESSMENT.................................................................................. 89<br />
6.7.1. Background.......................................................................................................................................89<br />
6.7.2. Poverty in the State ..........................................................................................................................89<br />
6.7.3. Poverty level in project Influenced Districts ...................................................................................91<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 2
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
6.7.4. Infrastructure Development and Poverty Alleviation ...................................................................92<br />
6.7.5. Infrastructure and Poverty Incidence in India ...............................................................................92<br />
6.7.8. <strong>Himachal</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong> and Scope for Poverty Reduction ...............................................94<br />
6.7.9. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................95<br />
6.7.10. Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................................95<br />
6.7. 11. Probable Impacts <strong>of</strong> Improved Road Network ........................................................................102<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 7 - COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION ...................................... 106<br />
7.1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................... 106<br />
7.2. CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION MECHANISMS .................................... 107<br />
7.3. LEVELS OF CONSULTATIONS ....................................................................... 107<br />
7.4. METHODS OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION ......................................................... 108<br />
7.5. CONSULTATION PRIOR TO RESETTLEMENT .................................................... 109<br />
7.5.1. Individual Level Consultation ........................................................................................................109<br />
7.5.2. Group Meetings..............................................................................................................................110<br />
7.5.3. Focus Group Discussions ................................................................................................................110<br />
7.6. KEY FINDINGS OF THE CONSULTATION ........................................................ 111<br />
7.7. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS............................................... 112<br />
7.8. PLAN FOR CONTINUED PARTICIPATION....................................................... 112<br />
7.9. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF RESETTLEMENT PLAN .............................................. 113<br />
7.10. INFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND FUTURE PLANS ......................................... 114<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 8 - GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM .............................. 116<br />
8.1. NEED FOR GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ............................................. 116<br />
8.2. GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE .............................................................. 116<br />
8.3. DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE (DLC).............................................................. 116<br />
8.4. FUNCTIONS OF THE GRC ............................................................................ 117<br />
8.5. ARBITRATION ............................................................................................. 118<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 9 - INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT.................................... 119<br />
9.1. BACKGROUND........................................................................................... 119<br />
9.2. HP ROAD AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ....... 119<br />
9.3. HP STATE ROAD PROJECT........................................................................... 120<br />
9.3.1. The Process......................................................................................................................................120<br />
9.3.2 Environment and Social Management Unit .................................................................................121<br />
9.3.3. Social Management Unit...............................................................................................................121<br />
9.4. NEED FOR NGO/CBO................................................................................. 124<br />
9.4.1. Role <strong>of</strong> NGO....................................................................................................................................124<br />
9.5. TRAINING AND CAPACITY BUILDING........................................................... 126<br />
9.5.1. Areas <strong>of</strong> Capacity Building............................................................................................................126<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 10 - HIGHWAY RELATED DISEASES .................................... 128<br />
10.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 128<br />
10.2. HIV SCENARIO IN INDIA ........................................................................... 129<br />
10.3. HIV SCENARIO IN HP ................................................................................ 130<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 3
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
10.4. THE CAUSE OF THE SPREAD OF HIGHWAY RELATED DISEASES ..................... 130<br />
10.5. OTHER RELATED STUDIES........................................................................... 131<br />
10.5.1. Survey among Truckers along the corridor ................................................................................132<br />
10.5.2. The Objective <strong>of</strong> Survey ...............................................................................................................132<br />
10.5.3. Key Findings...................................................................................................................................132<br />
10.5.4. The reasons for seeking commercial sex by the truckers: ........................................................133<br />
10.5.5. General Practice by the truckers while indulging in commercial sex:....................................133<br />
10.5.6. Emerging Issues .............................................................................................................................134<br />
10.6. MEASURES FOR CONTROLLING THE SPREAD OF HIGHWAY DISEASES........... 134<br />
10.6.1. Approach for Implementing the Measures ...............................................................................134<br />
10.6.2. Measures for Controlling the Spread..........................................................................................135<br />
10.7.1. Information Campaign/Advertisement .....................................................................................136<br />
10.7.2. Co-Ordination with Other Agencies...........................................................................................136<br />
10.7.3. Construction Camp/Rest Areas/Truck Lay-Byes........................................................................136<br />
10.7.4. Plan for Awareness Campaign Prevention <strong>of</strong> STD/AIDS ...........................................................136<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 11 - INCOME RESTORATION ............................................. 139<br />
11.1. BACKGROUND......................................................................................... 139<br />
11.2. INCOME RESTORATION MEASURES UNDER R&R POLICY.............................. 139<br />
11.3. INCOME RESTORATION OPTIONS PREFERRED BY PAPS................................ 140<br />
11.4. INTER-AGENCY LINKAGES FOR INCOME RESTORATION .............................. 140<br />
11.5. STEPS IN INCOME RESTORATION ............................................................... 141<br />
11.5.1. Short Term IR activities ..................................................................................................................141<br />
11.5.2. Long Term IR Activities..................................................................................................................142<br />
11.6. CATEGORIES OF IMPACTS ........................................................................ 142<br />
11.7. BASIS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVE IR SCHEME ............................ 143<br />
11.8. NON LAND BASED IR SCHEMES ................................................................. 145<br />
11.8.1. Allied Agriculture Activities ..........................................................................................................145<br />
11.8.2. Petty Traders..................................................................................................................................145<br />
11.8.3. Skill related Schemes....................................................................................................................145<br />
11.8.4. Others.............................................................................................................................................145<br />
11.9. TRAINING..............................................................................................................................................145<br />
11.10. INSTITUTIONS .......................................................................................... 146<br />
11.11. MONITORING OF IR SCHEMES ................................................................. 146<br />
11.12. PLAN FOR INCOME RESTORATION ........................................................... 146<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 12 - IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ..................................... 147<br />
12.1. BACKGROUND......................................................................................... 147<br />
12.2. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE ................................................................. 147<br />
12.3. TIMING OF RESETTLEMENT......................................................................... 147<br />
12.4. MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES ..................................................................... 148<br />
12.5. IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITY............................................................. 148<br />
12.6. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RAP .................. 150<br />
12.7. TASKS FOR NGO IN IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................... 150<br />
12.8. STATUS OF RAP IMPLEMENTATION PREPARATION ....................................... 152<br />
12.9. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE .................................................................... 152<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 4
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 13 – BUDGET ................................................................... 151<br />
13.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 151<br />
13.2. UNIT COSTS - VALUE OF LAND .................................................................. 151<br />
13.3 TITLEHOLDER AGRICULTURAL LAND LOSS AND REPLACEMENT VALUE .......... 151<br />
13.4 TITLEHOLDER NON-AGRICULTURAL LAND LOSS AND REPLACEMENT VALUE .. 152<br />
13.5 VALUE OF STRUCTURES .............................................................................. 152<br />
13.6 RELIGIOUS STRUCTURE............................................................................... 152<br />
13.7 OTHER UTILITIES......................................................................................... 152<br />
13.7.1. Hand Pumps..................................................................................................................................152<br />
13.7.2. Well.................................................................................................................................................152<br />
13.7.3. Water tap ......................................................................................................................................153<br />
13.7.4. Water tank.....................................................................................................................................153<br />
13.7.5. Platform .........................................................................................................................................153<br />
13.7.6. Trees ...............................................................................................................................................153<br />
13.8. ASSISTANCE FOR SQUATTERS AND ENCROACHERS .................................... 153<br />
13.9. SHIFTING ALLOWANCE ............................................................................. 153<br />
13.10. TRAINING FOR UP-GRADATION OF SKILL ................................................. 153<br />
13.11. TRANSITIONAL ALLOWANCE ................................................................... 154<br />
13.12. RENTAL ALLOWANCE.............................................................................. 154<br />
13.13. ECONOMICAL REHABILITATION GRANT ................................................... 154<br />
13.14. RESETTLEMENT SITES................................................................................ 154<br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 14 - MONITORING AND EVALUATION .................................... 157<br />
14.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 157<br />
14.2. INTERNAL MONITORING............................................................................ 158<br />
14.2.1. Objectives <strong>of</strong> Internal Monitoring ...............................................................................................158<br />
14.2.2. Information required for Internal Monitoring..............................................................................158<br />
14.2.3. Monitoring Reporting Systems .....................................................................................................158<br />
14.2.4. Indicators for Monitoring..............................................................................................................159<br />
14.3. EXTERNAL EVALUATION ............................................................................ 160<br />
14.3.1. Objectives <strong>of</strong> External Evaluation ...............................................................................................160<br />
14.3.2. Information required for External Evaluation .............................................................................160<br />
14.3.3. Evaluation Reporting Systems......................................................................................................160<br />
14.3.4. Indicators for Evaluation ..............................................................................................................161<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 5
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
LIST OF T ABLES<br />
TABLE 1.1: LIST OF R OADS P ROPOSED F OR F EASIBILITY S TUDY ........................................... 25<br />
TABLE 1.2: LIST OF R OADS P RE-SELECTED F OR D ETAILED E NGINEERING............................... 26<br />
TABLE 1.3: ROADS COVERED UNDER RAP REPORT.......................................................... 30<br />
TABLE 3.1: DETAILED E NTITLEMENT M ATRIX................................................................... 41<br />
TABLE: 4.1: CORRIDOR WISE DATES OF C ENSUS S URVEY .................................................. 51<br />
TABLE 4.2: DISTRIBUTION OF AFFECTED FAMILIES ........................................................... 52<br />
TABLE 4.3: GENDER RATIO AMONG PAPS .................................................................... 53<br />
TABLE 4.4: RELIGIOUS BELIEF AMONG THE PAFS ............................................................ 53<br />
TABLE 4.5: SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AMONG PAFS ......................................................... 53<br />
TABLE 4.6: MARITAL STATUS OF THE PAPS .................................................................... 54<br />
TABLE 4.7: AGE GROUP OF AFFECTED PEOPLE ............................................................... 54<br />
TABLE 4.8: LITERACY LEVEL OF PAPS .......................................................................... 54<br />
TABLE 4.9: OCCUPATION PATTERN OF PAPS ................................................................ 55<br />
TABLE 4.10: HOUSEHOLD I NCOME.............................................................................. 55<br />
TABLE 4.11: VULNERABILITY AMONG AFFECTED FAMILIES.................................................. 56<br />
TABLE 4.12: TOTAL VULNERABLE POPULATION AMONG PAPS ............................................ 56<br />
TABLE 4.13: GENDER AMONG VULNERABLE P ERSONS...................................................... 56<br />
TABLE 4.14: HOUSEHOLD ASSET S TRUCTURE.................................................................. 57<br />
TABLE 4.15: DETAILS OF IMPACTED S TRUCTURES ............................................................ 57<br />
TABLE 4.16: STATUS OF THE IMPACTED FAMILIES............................................................. 58<br />
TABLE 4.17: DISTRIBUTION OF PAFS AND PDFS BY TYPE OF LOSS ....................................... 58<br />
TABLE 4.18: TYPE OF STRUCTURE ................................................................................ 58<br />
TABLE 4.19: MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT ON RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES...................................... 59<br />
TABLE 4.20: MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT ON COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES .................................. 59<br />
TABLE 4.21: MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT ON RESIDENTIAL CUM COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES ............ 59<br />
TABLE 4.22: LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT DUE TO IMPACT ON COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ........... 60<br />
TABLE 4.23: MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT ON OTHER STRUCTURES............................................. 60<br />
TABLE 4.24: LAND ACQUISITION D ETAILS (HA.)............................................................. 61<br />
TABLE 4.25: S UMMARY OF LAND TO BE ACQUIRED FOR VARIOUS PURPOSES .......................... 61<br />
TABLE 4.26: FAMILIES I MPACTED DUE TO LAND ACQUISITION ............................................ 61<br />
TABLE 4.27: EXTENT OF L AND ACQUISITION E STIMATES FOR BYPASSES ................................. 62<br />
TABLE 4.28: DISTRIBUTION OF C OMMUNITY P ROPERTIES BY AFFECT CATEGORY ..................... 62<br />
TABLE 4.29: MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT ON RELIGIOUS STRUCTURE/ SHRINE ............................... 63<br />
TABLE 4.30: I MPACT ON S CHOOLS BY PERCENTAGE........................................................ 63<br />
TABLE 4.31: I MPACT ON G OVERNMENT BUILDING BY PERCENTAGE ..................................... 63<br />
TABLE 4.32: A WARENESS ABOUT THE PROJECT............................................................... 63<br />
TABLE 4.33: SOURCE OF AWARENESS ABOUT THE PROJECT................................................ 64<br />
TABLE 4.34: OPINION ABOUT THE PROJECT................................................................... 64<br />
TABLE 4.35: RESETTLEMENT OPTION BY OWNER RESIDENT .................................................. 64<br />
TABLE 4.36: RESETTLEMENT OPTION BY OWNER COMMERCIAL............................................ 65<br />
TABLE 4.37: RESETTLEMENT OPTION BY T ENANT RESIDENTIAL AND TENANT COMMERCIAL........... 65<br />
TABLE 5.1: NUMBER OF WOMEN H EADED H OUSEHOLDS, FAMILIES AND MEMBERS .................. 67<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 6
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
TABLE 5.2: DISTRIBUTION OF PROJECT AFFECTED WOMEN IN AGE GROUP ............................ 67<br />
TABLE 5.3: LITERACY L EVEL AMONG AFFECTED WOMEN MEMBERS...................................... 67<br />
TABLE 5.4: OCCUPATION PATTERN AMONG THE PROJECT AFFECTED WOMEN......................... 68<br />
TABLE 5.5: PROJECT AFFECTED WOMEN IN VULNERABLE CATEGORY .................................... 68<br />
TABLE 5.6: DISTRIBUTION OF AFFECTED VULNERABLE FAMILIES........................................... 74<br />
TABLE 6.1: MINIMIZING IMPACT ON NUMBER OF S TRUCTURES ............................................ 78<br />
TABLE 6.2: AFFECTED P ERSONS AND FAMILIES............................................................... 79<br />
TABLE 6.3: LOCATION OF COVERED DRAINAGE TO REDUCE SOCIAL IMPACT.......................... 80<br />
TABLE 6.4: LOCATION OF TOE WALL/ RETAINING WALL TO REDUCE IMPACT........................... 81<br />
TABLE 6.5: PROTECTION MEASURES FOR STRUCTURES ON UPHILL......................................... 82<br />
TABLE 6.6: NO. OF BYPASS TO REDUCE SOCIAL IMPACT ................................................... 84<br />
TABLE 6.7: BHOOTA BYPASS EVALUATION AS REMEDIAL MEASURES...................................... 85<br />
TABLE 6.8: REALIGNMENT S ECTIONS FOR G EOMETRY IMPROVEMENT ................................... 87<br />
TABLE 6.9: PROVISION OF RAIN S HELTER ON PROJECT ROADS ........................................... 88<br />
TABLE 6.10: MAJOR I NTERSECTIONS ALONG THE R OADS .................................................. 89<br />
TABLE 6.11: HEAD C OUNT RATIOS FOR HIMACHAL P RADESH........................................... 90<br />
TABLE 6.12: DEPENDENCY RATIOS IN HIMACHAL P RADESH ............................................. 90<br />
TABLE 6.13: SURVEY ON POOR FAMILIES (1998–99) – RURAL ......................................... 91<br />
TABLE: 6.14 I NDIA’S I NFRASTRUCTURE AND G ROWTH T REND ............................................. 93<br />
TABLE: 6.15: NO. OF BPL FAMILIES AMONG THE AFFECTED FAMILIES................................... 96<br />
TABLE 6.16: HEALTH FACILITY IN THE STATE................................................................. 100<br />
TABLE 7.1: MECHANISM FOR PARTICIPATION .............................................................. 114<br />
TABLE9.1: RESPONSIBILITIES OF VARIOUS STAKEHOLDERS IN RAP IMPLEMENTATION ............... 122<br />
TABLE 9.2: TRAINING MODULE FOR HPRIDC STAFF ....................................................... 126<br />
TABLE 11.1: TRAINING OPTIONS AS PREFERRED BY PAFS (PERCENTAGE) ........................... 140<br />
TABLE 11.2: CRITERIA FOR ALTERATIVE IR SCHEMES ..................................................... 144<br />
TABLE 12.1: RAP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: ACTIVITIES IN MONTHS ............................. 153<br />
TABLE 13.1: I TEM WISE ESTIMATED BUDGET FOR RAP IMPLEMENTATION .............................. 154<br />
TABLE 13.2: ESTIMATED BUDGET FOR RAP PHASE I....................................................... 156<br />
TABLE 14.1: I NDICATORS FOR MONITORING OF RAP PROGRESS ...................................... 159<br />
TABLE 14.2: I NDICATORS FOR P ROJECT O UTCOME E VALUATION...................................... 161<br />
LIST OF FIGURES AND MAPS<br />
FIGURE 1.1: SHOWING PHASE I ROADS ....................................................................... 27<br />
FIGURE 8.1: GRIEVANCE R EDRESS S TAGES ................................................................. 117<br />
FIGURE 9.1: ORGANISATIONAL S TRUCTURE OF HPRIDC ................................................ 119<br />
FIGURE 9.2: ORGANISATIONAL S TRUCTURE OF SMU ..................................................... 120<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 7
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
ABBREVIATIONS<br />
Abbreviations, Terms and Definitions<br />
WB : World Bank<br />
PAP : <strong>Project</strong> Affected Person<br />
PAF : <strong>Project</strong> Affected Families<br />
PAH : <strong>Project</strong> Affected Household<br />
BPL : Below Poverty Line<br />
WHH : Women Headed Households<br />
COI : Corridor <strong>of</strong> Impact<br />
CPRs : Common Property Resources<br />
CSW : Commercial Sex Worker<br />
EP : Entitled Person<br />
Ha : Hectare<br />
LAA : Land Acquisition Act<br />
NGO : Non-<strong>Government</strong> Organisation<br />
RAP : Resettlement Action Plan<br />
ROW : Right <strong>of</strong> Way<br />
RRO : Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer<br />
SC : Scheduled Caste<br />
ST : Scheduled Tribe<br />
U/s : Under Section<br />
CMU : Corridor Management Unit<br />
SMU : Social Management Unit<br />
ESMU : Environment and Social Management Unit<br />
DLC : District Level Committee<br />
GRC : Grievance Redress Committee<br />
GoHP : <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong><br />
Bigha<br />
Hectare<br />
Corridor <strong>of</strong> Impact<br />
Development Block<br />
Tehsil/Subdivision<br />
Panchayat Samiti<br />
District Collector<br />
/Magistrate<br />
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS<br />
1/5 <strong>of</strong> an acre<br />
A unit for measuring land area. (Hectare equals 10000 Square Meters).<br />
Width <strong>of</strong> corridor required for the construction <strong>of</strong> road, service lane, drain,<br />
footpath, access, tree plantation and for safety zone. The corridor <strong>of</strong> impact for<br />
the project a) in Open and Built–up areas it would be 13 meters in Hilly terrain &<br />
15 meters in Rolling terrain, however in Built-up areas where it is not possible it<br />
would be 9 meters in Hilly terrain & 10 meters in Rolling terrain.<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> villages grouped together form a Development Block.<br />
Revenue administration unit comprising <strong>of</strong> group <strong>of</strong> villages<br />
Local Self-governing body at Block level is Panchayat Samiti.<br />
Administrative head <strong>of</strong> a District.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 8
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Divisional<br />
Commissioner<br />
Panchayat<br />
Poverty Line<br />
Sarpanch<br />
Gair Khatedar<br />
Jambandi Basic<br />
record <strong>of</strong> land rights<br />
Khatedar or tenant<br />
Muafi Lands<br />
Pucca<br />
Semi Pucca<br />
Kachha<br />
Entitled Person<br />
Titleholder<br />
Administrative head <strong>of</strong> a division comprising a number <strong>of</strong> districts.<br />
Elected local self-governing body at village level.<br />
A family whose annual income from all sources is less than a designated sum as<br />
fixed by the concerned State Govt. in which the project falls, will be considered<br />
to be below Poverty Line.<br />
Elected chief <strong>of</strong> a village.<br />
Includes allotees, holders <strong>of</strong> muafi lands<br />
Basic record <strong>of</strong> land rights<br />
According to Law, all land belongs to the State and all so-called landowners are<br />
tenants <strong>of</strong> the State. They are called Khatedars<br />
Include lands attached with Temples, Mosques, Gurudwara, Churches etc.<br />
Cement, bricks or concrete build structure<br />
Structures with tiles/ thatch ro<strong>of</strong>/ brick cement wall<br />
Structures with stone/ mud wall/ thatch ro<strong>of</strong><br />
A person adversely impacted by the project and is entitled to some kind <strong>of</strong><br />
assistance as per the project entitlement framework<br />
A person who possess legal documents towards the claim for the property<br />
Grievance<br />
Cell<br />
Redress<br />
A cell set up by the project authority headed by District Magistrate/or his<br />
representative to look in to grievances <strong>of</strong> a PAP<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 9
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Executive Summary<br />
1. Introduction<br />
The <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India has requested the assistance <strong>of</strong> the World Bank for the<br />
improvement and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> State Highways, Major District Roads and Other<br />
District Roads in the State <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong>. The improvement works will consist<br />
mainly in raising the formation level, upgrading/improvement <strong>of</strong> road geometrics,<br />
widening to two-lane/intermediate-lane from the existing, intermediate-lane or singlelane<br />
width, and pavement strengthening, improving the cross drainage. Road<br />
stretches crossing urban areas may also require upgrading to a two-lane cross section,<br />
and/or provision for drains, sidewalks and parking where required. In some cases, new<br />
alignments (by-passes) and/or re-alignments may also be required. The <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> (GOHP) through the <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> Road Infrastructure<br />
Development Corporation (HPRIDC) will be the executing agency for the project<br />
2. <strong>Project</strong> Objectives<br />
In order to make rapid economic growth <strong>of</strong> the state, a design speed for the safe and<br />
efficient movement <strong>of</strong> people and goods is seen as the objective. The road design will<br />
be aiming to achieve above standard with the required cost effectiveness coupled<br />
with necessary environmental and social management considerations in achieving<br />
sustainable development <strong>of</strong> the State. The very hill roads with deep valleys and steep<br />
geologically unstable formations cause considerable unsafe for the highway users; be it<br />
pedestrians, drivers and passengers. Thus the project is to alleviate the current unsafe<br />
and congested conditions <strong>of</strong> the project road connecting the villages and towns, with<br />
one another and to the NH network for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the road users in particular and<br />
the state at large.<br />
3. Methodology<br />
The study is based mainly on quantitative data collected through census socioeconomic<br />
survey schedule (the census questionnaire and socio-economic survey<br />
questionnaire was integrated in to one) and qualitative inputs through consultations<br />
and discussions with PAPs, local villagers and other stakeholders. A detailed verification<br />
and census exercise was carried out within the proposed CoI to identify the affected<br />
structures and land. The verification included collection <strong>of</strong> details in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
owner or occupant <strong>of</strong> the structure, its type and usage coming within CoI on either side<br />
<strong>of</strong> the existing centerline. To collect this information a well-designed and pre-tested<br />
schedule was used in the survey. However, during the course <strong>of</strong> the survey, it was found<br />
out that a number <strong>of</strong> absentee land lords were not available and in such cases<br />
information were collected from their immediate neighboring households or from their<br />
next <strong>of</strong> kin; but detailed socio-economic information could not be captured for such<br />
households. Besides, quantitative data collection method, a number <strong>of</strong> tools was also<br />
used for eliciting information. Some <strong>of</strong> the important tools used for the study are:<br />
I. Focused Group Discussion (FGD)<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 10
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
II. Community meetings<br />
III. Key Informants Interview<br />
IV. Participatory Rural Appraisal Method (PRA)<br />
To complement the empirical field data, information were also collected from a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> secondary sources like Census, statistical census hand book, land records,<br />
sales statistics <strong>of</strong> land from revenue department, PWD Office etc.<br />
4. Corridor details<br />
This report deals with Phase I corridors out <strong>of</strong> 443 km <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State<br />
Road <strong>Project</strong>. The resettlement action plan report covers the corridors as given in table<br />
1.3. The present report is a consolidated one highlighting the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the project area,<br />
its possible impact on the socio-economic conditions <strong>of</strong> the people, process <strong>of</strong> land<br />
acquisition, entitlement <strong>of</strong> the affected persons and an action plan incorporating<br />
mitigating measures to overcome the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> the project on the impacted<br />
people and also to ensure restoration <strong>of</strong> their livelihood in a timely fashion.<br />
Table E-1: Roads covered under RAP report<br />
Sr. No. Name <strong>of</strong> Road<br />
length (in km)<br />
1 Mehatpur Una Mubarikpur Daulatpur H.P. boundary Road 45.200<br />
2 Una Aghar Barsar Jahu Bhambla Mandi-upto Ner Chowk road 109.00<br />
3 Theog Kothkhai Hatkoti Rohroo 80.730<br />
Total 234.93<br />
5. Policy & Legal Framework for Addressing the Adverse Effects<br />
The <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> recognizing the need to address the issues <strong>of</strong> involuntary<br />
displacement and loss <strong>of</strong> properties as well as livelihood that would result during the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the project. To address the social issues arising out <strong>of</strong> project<br />
implementation, the existing Acts and laws has been analysed to understand the<br />
requirements under existing national and state level laws and identifying the gPAPs<br />
where there is a need for strengthening to comply with the World Bank policy on<br />
resettlement and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> project affected persons and indigenous population<br />
development plan. The <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Government</strong> has framed its own Resettlement and<br />
Rehabilitation (R&R) Policy to tackle the project related social issues. Under the Policy,<br />
there is provision to pay R&R assistance to the displaced persons including the non title<br />
holders for loss <strong>of</strong> structures, additional assistance for those belonging to the BPL or<br />
other vulnerable category (like the ST or the SC) and provision <strong>of</strong> determining<br />
compensation for the land and property lost by the PAP through negotiation basis to<br />
ensure replacement cost to the affected. Apart from this, the policy also clearly states<br />
that all the payments (compensation and R&R assistance) will be made to the<br />
affected persons before taking over possession <strong>of</strong> such land. Transitional allowance,<br />
shifting allowance, skill up-gradation/training for the affected people, economic<br />
rehabilitation grant, assistance for damage to standing crop, choice for resettlement to<br />
the Displaced Persons either in the resettlement colony or self relocation etc. have<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 11
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
been kept in the policy as provisions to ensure restoration <strong>of</strong> livelihood within a<br />
reasonable period <strong>of</strong> time. The policy is presented in table E – 2.<br />
Table E – 2: Entitlement Policy for HP State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
1A Private Agricultur<br />
Property al land<br />
and assets<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Titleholder<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
Compensation at “replacement cost”<br />
Impact Category: Losing Less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
holding and remaining land is above MEH (more<br />
than 5 bighas).<br />
1. Compensation will be paid at the replacement<br />
cost.<br />
Impact Category: Losing more than 20% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
holding remaining land holding is above MEH<br />
1. Compensation will be paid at the replacement<br />
cost.<br />
2. Training for skill up-gradation<br />
3. ERG up to Rs. 24,000 for vulnerable groups<br />
Impact Category: If remaining land after<br />
acquisition is below MEH, EP will be entitled to<br />
1. Compensation will be paid at the replacement<br />
cost.<br />
2. If EP is from vulnerable group, compensation for<br />
the entire land is by means <strong>of</strong> land for land if so<br />
wished by EP provided that the land <strong>of</strong> equal or<br />
more productive value is available.<br />
3. Compensation is given for the entire plot<br />
including residual plot, if the owner <strong>of</strong> such land<br />
wishes that the project authority should also<br />
acquire his residual plot. The project authority<br />
will acquire the residual plot so paid.<br />
4. Transitional allowance to be calculated at the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> Rs. 70 per day for 24 days if land loss is<br />
less than 10% <strong>of</strong> the total holding, for 48 days if<br />
loss is between 10 to 20%, for 72 days if loss is<br />
between 20 to 50% and 100 days if loss is more<br />
than 50% <strong>of</strong> total holding.<br />
5. All fees, taxes and other charges, as applicable<br />
under the relevant laws, incurred in the<br />
relocation and resource establishment, are to<br />
be borne by the project.<br />
6. Training would be provided for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
skills on RDD pattern<br />
7. One-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant in the<br />
form <strong>of</strong> productive assets to vulnerable group<br />
8. Able bodied PAPs will be given preference for<br />
employment with contractor for semi skilled /<br />
unskilled subject to fulfilling the requisite criteria<br />
/ qualification.<br />
Absentee landlords will be only entitled for<br />
compensation at replacement value.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 12
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
1B<br />
Private<br />
Property<br />
Nonagricultur<br />
al land<br />
and assets<br />
Titleholder /<br />
owner:<br />
Residential<br />
Compensation at “replacement cost”<br />
Impact Category: Loss <strong>of</strong> structure less than 20% <strong>of</strong><br />
the total size <strong>of</strong> the structure and structure remains<br />
viable<br />
1. EP will be provided replacement cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />
residential structure, which will be<br />
calculated as per the prevailing basic schedule<br />
<strong>of</strong> rates without depreciation, subject to<br />
relevant “quality standards” <strong>of</strong> BSR as<br />
maintained by <strong>Government</strong>/Local Bodies<br />
Authorities.<br />
2. Compensation for the loss <strong>of</strong> residential land will<br />
be paid at replacement value<br />
3. Right to salvage materials from the demolished<br />
structure<br />
Impact Category: Loss <strong>of</strong> structure more than 20%<br />
and remaining structure becomes unviable<br />
Apart from entitlements as described above, such<br />
EPs will also be entitled for<br />
5. A lump sum rental allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3000 in rural<br />
areas and Rs. 6000 in urban areas.<br />
6. A lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if<br />
within the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000<br />
if outside the affected village or municipality or<br />
new destination is more than 2 Km.<br />
7. A free plot <strong>of</strong> 40 to 70 sq. meter and<br />
construction allowance equal to amount given<br />
under Indira Awas Yojana for houseless<br />
vulnerable groups. For the non-vulnerable<br />
group, plots will be made available on cost<br />
basis.<br />
8. Able bodied PAPs will be given preference for<br />
employment with contractor for semi skilled /<br />
unskilled subject to fulfilling the requisite criteria<br />
/ qualification.<br />
Absentee landlords will receive only the<br />
compensation at “replacement cost”.<br />
1C<br />
Private<br />
Property<br />
Nonagricultur<br />
al land<br />
and assets<br />
Titleholder /<br />
owner:<br />
Commercial<br />
Compensation at “replacement cost”<br />
Impact Category: Loss <strong>of</strong> structure less than 20% <strong>of</strong><br />
the total size <strong>of</strong> the structure and structure remains<br />
viable<br />
1. EP will be provided replacement cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />
commercial structure, which will be calculated<br />
as per the prevailing basic schedule <strong>of</strong> rates<br />
without depreciation, subject to relevant<br />
“quality standards” <strong>of</strong> BSR as maintained by<br />
<strong>Government</strong>/Local Bodies Authorities.<br />
2. Compensation for the loss <strong>of</strong> commercial land<br />
will be paid at replacement value<br />
3. One time grant <strong>of</strong> Rs, 1500 as Transitional<br />
allowance<br />
4. Right to salvage materials from the demolished<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 13
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
structure.<br />
Impact Category: If EP is displaced<br />
Apart from entitlements as described above, such<br />
EPs will also be entitled for<br />
1. A lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if<br />
within the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000<br />
if outside the affected village or municipality or<br />
new destination is more than 2 Km.<br />
2. Training would be provided for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
skills<br />
3. A plot <strong>of</strong> 25 sq. m on cost basis<br />
4. All vulnerable EP’s loosing commercial structure<br />
shall be entitled for ERG in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
productive assets. If such vulnerable EP is<br />
displaced, he shall also be entitled for 25 sqmt.<br />
<strong>of</strong> plot free <strong>of</strong> cost, provided such EP is landless.<br />
However, if such EP owns land somewhere else<br />
and insists for plot, he will be provided 25 sqmt.<br />
plot on market price.<br />
5. Able bodied PAPs will be given preference for<br />
employment with contractor for semi skilled /<br />
unskilled subject to fulfilling the requisite criteria<br />
/ qualification Absentee landlords will receive<br />
only the compensation at “replacement cost”.<br />
ID<br />
Private<br />
Property<br />
Nonagricultur<br />
al land<br />
and assets<br />
Tenant:<br />
Residential<br />
1. The amount <strong>of</strong> deposit or advance payment<br />
paid by the tenant to the landlord or the<br />
remaining amount at the time <strong>of</strong> expropriation.<br />
(This will be deducted from the payment to the<br />
landlord).<br />
2. A lump sum rental allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3000 in rural<br />
areas and Rs. 6000 in urban areas 3.<br />
Compensation for any structure the tenant has<br />
erected on the property. (This will be<br />
deducted from the payment to the landlord).<br />
4. A lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if<br />
within the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000<br />
if outside the affected village or municipality or<br />
new destination is more than 2 Km.<br />
1E<br />
Private<br />
Property<br />
Nonagricultur<br />
al land<br />
and assets<br />
Tenant:<br />
Commercial<br />
1. The amount <strong>of</strong> deposit or advance payment<br />
paid by the tenant to the landlord or the<br />
remaining amount at the time <strong>of</strong> expropriation.<br />
(This will be deducted from the payment to the<br />
landlord).<br />
2. A lump sum rental allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3000 in rural<br />
areas and Rs. 6000 in urban areas.<br />
3. Compensation for any structure the tenant has<br />
erected on the property. (This will be<br />
deducted from the payment to the landlord).<br />
4. Lump sum Shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if within<br />
the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000 if<br />
outside the affected village or municipality or<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 14
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
new destination is more than 2 Km.<br />
5. Training would be provided for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
skills<br />
6. Vulnerable EPs would be provided one-time<br />
Economic Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
productive assets<br />
1F<br />
Private<br />
Property<br />
Agricultur<br />
e land<br />
and other<br />
assets<br />
Unclear title<br />
/disputed<br />
titles<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> land / structure:<br />
Compensation at replacement value for land /<br />
structure.<br />
R&R assistance<br />
1. Will be treated at par with titleholders. However<br />
for disputed cases assistances would be<br />
released only after the case is settled either<br />
through court or by consensus<br />
2 Others<br />
2A Livelihood Wage<br />
earners<br />
Individual<br />
Lump sum<br />
Impact Category: Loss <strong>of</strong> income due to acquisition<br />
<strong>of</strong> agriculture land where the person was working<br />
as agriculture labour or sharecropper, etc or due to<br />
acquisition <strong>of</strong> commercial establishment where the<br />
person was engaged as working hand.<br />
1. They will be paid a lump sum transitional<br />
allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if associated for past<br />
three years continuously<br />
2. Training would be provided for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
skills<br />
3. Vulnerable EPs would be provided one-time<br />
Economic Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
productive assets<br />
2B<br />
Nonperennial<br />
corps<br />
Family<br />
Notice to harvest standing crops<br />
1. They will be given a notice 4 months in<br />
advance.<br />
2. Grant towards crop lost before harvest due to<br />
forced relocation, equal to market value <strong>of</strong><br />
crop lost plus cost <strong>of</strong> replacement <strong>of</strong> seeds for<br />
the next season’s harvest.<br />
2C<br />
Perennial<br />
crops such<br />
as fruit<br />
trees<br />
Family<br />
Compensation at “replacement value”<br />
Compensation for perennial crops and trees,<br />
calculated as annual produce value multiplied by<br />
remaining life <strong>of</strong> the tree.<br />
3 Illegal Use <strong>of</strong> the ROW<br />
3A Illegal use <strong>of</strong><br />
the ROW<br />
Encroach<br />
ers<br />
Family Will receive no compensation for land but<br />
assistance for assets to the vulnerable<br />
1. Encroachers will be notified in time in which to<br />
remove their assets (except trees) and harvest<br />
their crops.<br />
2. Compensation for structures at replacement<br />
cost to the vulnerable person.<br />
3. Training would be provided for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 15
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
skills to the EPs loosing commercial activities<br />
4. Vulnerable EPs loosing commercial activities<br />
would be provided one-time Economic<br />
Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong> productive<br />
assets<br />
5. Right to salvage materials from the demolished<br />
structure.<br />
3B Squatters Family Will receive no compensation for land but<br />
assistance for assets.<br />
1. Compensation for loss <strong>of</strong> structure at<br />
replacement cost.<br />
2. A lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if<br />
within the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000<br />
if outside the affected village or municipality or<br />
new destination is more than 2 Km.<br />
3. Training would be provided for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
skills to the EPs loosing commercial activities<br />
4. Vulnerable EPs loosing commercial activities<br />
would be provided one-time economic<br />
Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong> productive<br />
assets<br />
5. Right to salvage materials from the demolished<br />
structure.<br />
3C<br />
Shifting<br />
Business<br />
Ambulator<br />
y vendors<br />
(Kiosks)<br />
Family They are not eligible for compensation or<br />
“assistance”<br />
Ambulatory vendors licensed for fixed locations will<br />
be considered as kiosks.<br />
They will receive lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />
300.<br />
4. Community<br />
infrastructur<br />
e, cohesion<br />
and<br />
amenities<br />
Common<br />
property<br />
resources<br />
Community Conservation, protection, compensatory<br />
replacement<br />
1. Easily replaced resources, such as cultural<br />
properties will be conserved (by means <strong>of</strong><br />
special protection, relocation, replacement,<br />
etc.) in consultation with the community.<br />
2. Loss <strong>of</strong> access to firewood, etc. will be<br />
compensated by involving the communities<br />
in a social forestry scheme, in co-ordination<br />
with the Department <strong>of</strong> Forests, wherever<br />
possible.<br />
3. Adequate safety measures, particularly for<br />
pedestrians and children (for details refer to<br />
safety planning section in <strong>Project</strong>’s Design<br />
Document);<br />
4. Landscaping <strong>of</strong> community common areas;<br />
improved drainage; roadside rest areas,<br />
etc. are all provided in the design <strong>of</strong> the<br />
highways.<br />
5. Employment opportunities in the project during<br />
construction phase for able- bodied<br />
individuals, if possible.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 16
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
6. Loss <strong>of</strong> trees will be replaced by compensatory<br />
afforestation (for details refer to EMP).<br />
4A<br />
Any other impact not yet<br />
identified, whether loss <strong>of</strong><br />
asset or livelihood<br />
Unforeseen impacts will be documented and<br />
mitigated based on the principles agreed upon in<br />
this policy framework. For e.g., loss <strong>of</strong> access to<br />
agriculture field during construction stage.<br />
6. <strong>Project</strong> Impact<br />
For the proposed project, a number <strong>of</strong> adverse effects are likely to be encountered by<br />
the people. While some <strong>of</strong> the losses are direct, some others are indirect effects.<br />
However, the direct losses likely to be experienced by the people are: loss <strong>of</strong> residential<br />
structure, loss <strong>of</strong> commercial structure, loss <strong>of</strong> agricultural land, loss <strong>of</strong> fruit bearing and<br />
non fruit bearing trees and loss <strong>of</strong> common property etc. Similarly, acquisition <strong>of</strong> land<br />
and consequently widening <strong>of</strong> the existing roads also have many likely indirect adverse<br />
effects. Some <strong>of</strong> those include loss <strong>of</strong> employment opportunity, loss <strong>of</strong> livelihood<br />
because <strong>of</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> commercial structures.<br />
6.1. Land Acquisition/Transfer<br />
The project would require the acquisition/transfer <strong>of</strong> 93.38 ha <strong>of</strong> land, <strong>of</strong> which<br />
48.68 ha. is private land and the rest is government and forest land. Land will be<br />
acquired for bypasses at urban stretches and settlement areas to reduce<br />
accidents and impact on properties, for junction improvement, realignment to<br />
improve geometry and widening. The details <strong>of</strong> land requirement are presented<br />
in Table E - 3.<br />
Table E - 3: Land Acquisition (in ha.)<br />
Particulars Mehatpur - Amb Una – Nerchowk Theog - Rohru<br />
Junction Improvement 0.37 0.60 0.19<br />
Bypasses 0.00 2.00 0.00<br />
Re-alignments 11.19 13.044 1.094<br />
Widening 6.00 37.126 21.766<br />
Total 17.56 52.77 23.05<br />
6.2. Impact on families<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 4346 families (16896 persons) will be affected due to the proposed<br />
project as shown in Table E - 4. Out <strong>of</strong> this about 427 families and 3238 persons<br />
fall in displaced category. This includes squatters, encroaches, tenant and<br />
titleholders.<br />
Table E - 4: <strong>Project</strong> Affected Households<br />
Corridor name Affected<br />
Families<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Affected<br />
Persons<br />
Displaced<br />
Families<br />
<strong>Project</strong> displaced<br />
Persons<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 507 2698 127 1091<br />
Una – Nerchowk 3022 11725 245 1808<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 17
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Corridor name Affected<br />
Families<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Affected<br />
Persons<br />
Displaced<br />
Families<br />
<strong>Project</strong> displaced<br />
Persons<br />
Theog - Rohru 817 2473 55 339<br />
Total 4346 16896 427 3238<br />
6.3. Impact on Structures<br />
As regard impact on structures along the highway, the proposed development<br />
would affect 683 structures affecting in all 783 families. The maximum numbers<br />
are in Una- Nerchowk followed by Mehatpur-Amb (table E – 5).<br />
Table E - 5: Impact on Structures<br />
Corridor name Affected Structures Affected Families<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 176 205<br />
Una – Nerchowk 430 466<br />
Theog - Rohru 77 112<br />
Total 683 783<br />
6.4. Impact on Gender<br />
The total number females impacted due to the project are 7928. This is 47<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> all affected population. In terms <strong>of</strong> percentage, only 4.96 percent<br />
affected families are women headed households (table E – 6).<br />
Table E – 6: Impact on structures<br />
Corridor name No. <strong>of</strong> Female PAPs % WHH families to total<br />
impacted families<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 1268 3.90%<br />
Una – Nerchowk 5461 3.82%<br />
Theog - Rohru 1196 12.90%<br />
Total 7928 4.96%<br />
6.5. Impact on Common Properties<br />
Apart from private property owners, encroachers, squatters, the project will have<br />
impact on various common property resources along the corridor. In all 266<br />
properties will be impacted as shown in Table E - 7.<br />
Table E - 7: Loss <strong>of</strong> Common Property Resources<br />
Particulars<br />
Mehatpur - Una – Theog -<br />
Amb Nerchowk Rohru<br />
Total<br />
Religious place 3 9 2 15<br />
Hand Pumps 1 58 13 72<br />
Schools 0 1 0 1<br />
Bus Stops 18 16 6 40<br />
Compound wall 4 2 0 6<br />
<strong>Government</strong> buildings 8 10 4 22<br />
Co-operative building 0 1 0 1<br />
Religious platform 0 18 0 18<br />
Well 4 7 0 11<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 18
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Mehatpur - Una – Theog -<br />
Particulars<br />
Total<br />
Amb Nerchowk Rohru<br />
Water Tank 4 24 9 38<br />
Water tap 1 31 2 34<br />
Public toilet 0 2 0 2<br />
Pump house 2 0 0 2<br />
platform 3 0 0 3<br />
Others 0 1 0 1<br />
Total 48 180 36 266<br />
7. Minimisation <strong>of</strong> Impacts<br />
Due importance has been given to environmental and social issues while designing he<br />
road. The coordination between social and design team helped in reducing the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> PAPs. In the design, various mitigation measures incorporated include:<br />
7.1. Delineation <strong>of</strong> CoI<br />
The limit <strong>of</strong> impact in the project has been limited to the corridor <strong>of</strong> Impact. The<br />
corridor <strong>of</strong> impact is the corridor required for the actual construction <strong>of</strong> the road,<br />
including carriageway, shoulders embankments and longitudinal drainage.<br />
Within this corridor there should be no structures or hindrances. The project will<br />
not displace or adversely affect any person outside the CoI.<br />
7.2. Concentric Widening<br />
The approach <strong>of</strong> concentric widening has been adopted major part <strong>of</strong> the road<br />
length in all the corridors to avoid land acquisition. This method is very suitable in<br />
settlement and market sections to avoid impact on structure as well. In addition<br />
to this the concentric widening approach has been followed in major part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
alignment to avoid land acquisition.<br />
7.3. Provisions <strong>of</strong> Covered Drainage<br />
To reduce the land intake and impact on the structures along the highway,<br />
covered drainage has been proposed at various locations and specifically in<br />
settlement sections where the properties are just at the edge <strong>of</strong> RoW.<br />
7.4. Provision <strong>of</strong> Toe Wall/retaining wall<br />
Provision <strong>of</strong> toe wall and retaining wall can reduce the impact in many respects<br />
and specifically reducing the land intake and avoiding the structures getting<br />
impacted due to slope <strong>of</strong> embankment. In Mehatpu – Una road the length <strong>of</strong><br />
such protection work is 3378 meters and in case <strong>of</strong> Una - Nerchowk it is 3690<br />
meters.<br />
7.5. Specific protection to save structures on uphill<br />
In addition to provision <strong>of</strong> covered drain, toe wall and retaining wall, location<br />
specific measures have been provided to protect the structures along the<br />
corridor. This specific measure are provided in Una – Nerchowk and Theog –<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 19
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Rohru road since the roads fall in hilly terrain and structures are at higher level<br />
than the road.<br />
7.6. Provision <strong>of</strong> Bypasses<br />
Provision <strong>of</strong> bypass is another way <strong>of</strong> reducing the social impact due to the<br />
project. This is especially effective in location <strong>of</strong> heavy concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
properties along the road and non availability <strong>of</strong> adequate with to built a safe<br />
road. The bypasses also acts long term solution to safety issues in congested<br />
areas by way <strong>of</strong> avoiding it altogether.<br />
7.7. Reduction <strong>of</strong> Speed<br />
In addition to the various measures discussed above, reduction in travel speed is<br />
also used in the project to minimise the social impacts. These are mainly<br />
engineering measures which includes singe, speed breakers, road markings etc.<br />
7.8. Alternatives Considered<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> alternatives is another method used extensively in the project to<br />
reduce the social impact. This process has been adopted successfully in the<br />
HPSRP in selecting the option having least social impact and at the same time<br />
meeting the engineering requirements. This exercise was carried out jointly with<br />
the design, bridge, environment, social teams, PWD <strong>of</strong>ficials from head quarter<br />
and local divisions and the likely project affected families.<br />
8. Community Consultation<br />
Public consultations were held with various sections <strong>of</strong> affected persons such as traders,<br />
women, village elders, Panchayat members and other inhabitants. People in general<br />
agreed on the need to widen the highway and improving it. The process <strong>of</strong> information<br />
was highly appreciated by the local residents. During public consultations issues related<br />
to safety, compensation, income restoration, employment generation, information<br />
flow, grievance redress, role <strong>of</strong> administration etc. were discussed. Issues were also<br />
raised about the transparency in the project implementation process. The RP<br />
addresses all issues raised during public consultation and recommends institutional<br />
strengthening measures as well. The consultation process included the following:<br />
• Heads <strong>of</strong> households likely to be impacted;<br />
• Household members;<br />
• Clusters <strong>of</strong> PAPs;<br />
• Villagers;<br />
• Village Panchayats;<br />
• Local voluntary organizations; and Community based organization or Non<br />
<strong>Government</strong>al Organization;<br />
• <strong>Government</strong> Agencies and Departments, and<br />
• Major project stakeholders, such as women, road user groups, and others.<br />
9. Grievance Redress Mechanism<br />
For redress <strong>of</strong> grievances <strong>of</strong> PAPs in all aspects relating to Land Acquisition (LA) and<br />
payment <strong>of</strong> compensation in Rehabilitation Action Plan, Grievance Redress Committee<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 20
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
(GRC) will be formed much in advance. The Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) will<br />
be formed at each district comprising <strong>of</strong> following members –<br />
• Dist. Social Welfare Officer<br />
• Executive Engineer, CMU<br />
• Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer, CMU<br />
• NGO representative<br />
• PAP representative, and<br />
• Kannngo, CMU (only cases related to land)<br />
A district Level Committee will be formed to meet at periodic interval to review the<br />
progress <strong>of</strong> land acquisition and facilitate implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP in the district.<br />
District Level Committee would comprise <strong>of</strong> the following members:<br />
• Deputy Commissioner (Chairman)<br />
• Land Acquisition Officer<br />
• Executive Engineer (PWD)<br />
• NGO<br />
• The Chairman <strong>of</strong> Block Samiti<br />
• The Mayor/Chairman/President <strong>of</strong> Municipal Corporation/Municipal<br />
Committee/Nagar Panchayat/Commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Municipal Corporation/<br />
Executive Officer.<br />
• A representative <strong>of</strong> PAPs.<br />
10. Institutional Mechanism for RAP Implementation<br />
There will be an Environment and Social Management Unit at the corporate level.<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Director is the head <strong>of</strong> this unit. Under ESMU there will be two separate unit<br />
called Environment Management Unit (EMU) and Social Management Unit (SMU)<br />
dealing with implementation <strong>of</strong> environment management plan and resettlement<br />
action respectively. The SMU will be headed by a Social Development Officer who will<br />
be responsible for day to day handling <strong>of</strong> social, resettlement and land related issue<br />
with the help <strong>of</strong> NGO hired for the purpose. The Social Development Officer will be<br />
assisted by Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer at the Corridor Management Unit<br />
level. The Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer will work as ear and eyes for the SMU<br />
in the field.<br />
11. Highway Health Risk<br />
Road safety and HIV/AIDS are the main highway related health risk to the road users<br />
and the people living along the road. The safety related risk has been addressed in the<br />
project through appropriate engineering solutions in the design. However, the HIV/AIDS<br />
related health risk can not be addressed through engineering solution but through<br />
various interventions like awareness generation, campaigning, counselling and<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> easy accessibility to contraceptive etc. The project has provision for<br />
awareness generation, campaigning, counselling and availability <strong>of</strong> contraceptive etc.<br />
among the labours engaged in the construction activities. The NGO engaged for RAP<br />
implementation will lead the process on behalf <strong>of</strong> department.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 21
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
12. Income Restoration<br />
Restoration <strong>of</strong> pre-project levels <strong>of</strong> income is an important part <strong>of</strong> rehabilitating in<br />
affected communities. The entitlement policy <strong>of</strong> HPSRP has many provisions in it for<br />
restoration <strong>of</strong> income <strong>of</strong> affected persons with an aim <strong>of</strong> improving the socioeconomic<br />
conditions f PAPs. In addition to this, the project will facilitate in taking full<br />
advantage <strong>of</strong> existing government schemes by the affected persons. The NGO will coordinate<br />
with various departments to integrate with over all project scenarios. The<br />
project has provision <strong>of</strong> training to upgrade the skill level and one time economic<br />
rehabilitation grant to vulnerable families in re-establishing themselves economically.<br />
13. Implementation Schedule<br />
The period for resettlement implementation has been taken as 24 months. Planning,<br />
surveying, assessing, policy development, institution identification, PAPs participation,<br />
income restoration and implementation are typical RP related activities, which have<br />
been considered. However, the sequence may change as delays occur due to<br />
circumstances beyond the control <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
14. Budget<br />
The budget <strong>of</strong> Rs. 741.45 million covers all components <strong>of</strong> compensation, assistance,<br />
entitlements & implementation support. Broad break up <strong>of</strong> the budget is shown in<br />
Table E - 8.<br />
Table E - 8: Estimated Budget for RAP Phase I<br />
Sl. No. Item Total amount in Rs.<br />
Financed By (in Rs.)<br />
World Bank<br />
GoHP<br />
1 Land Acquisition 571809056 0 571809056<br />
2 Structure compensation 103945000 0 133945000<br />
3 Assistance 32677852 32677852 0<br />
Livelihood 141000 141000 0<br />
6 Loss <strong>of</strong> crops 5400000 0 5400000<br />
9 Kiosk 8400 8400 0<br />
10 Other assets 21431560 21431560 0<br />
11 Training 500000 500000 0<br />
12 Support for RAP<br />
implementation<br />
5539500 5539500 0<br />
Total 741452368 60298312 711154056<br />
15. Monitoring and Evaluation<br />
The resettlement plan will have internal monitoring and external evaluation. The<br />
methods are specified in the resettlement plan. Internal monitoring will be carried out<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 22
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
by the Social Management Unit, whereas for mid term / end term evaluation an<br />
external agency will be hired by HPRIDC. Mid term evaluation will be carried out<br />
based on a 25 to 30%sample <strong>of</strong> PAPs covering both titleholders and non-titleholders by<br />
the external agency. Monitoring and Evaluation indicators are given in the<br />
Resettlement Action Pan.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 23
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 1 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION<br />
1.1. General<br />
The <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India has requested the assistance <strong>of</strong> the World Bank for the<br />
improvement and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> State Highways, Major District Roads and Other<br />
District Roads in the State <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong>. A Strategic Option Study (SOS), carried<br />
out for the Public Works Department (PWD), has prioritised road sections for<br />
improvement from the 1675 km <strong>of</strong> State Highways (SH) and Major District Roads (MDR).<br />
The major criteria used for selection in SOS, are traffic volume, restricted carriageway<br />
width, pavement conditions, economic activity in the influence area <strong>of</strong> the road,<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> commercial traffic and interconnectivity <strong>of</strong> the roads.<br />
The improvement works will consist mainly in raising the formation level,<br />
upgrading/improvement <strong>of</strong> road geometrics, widening to two-lane/intermediate-lane<br />
from the existing, intermediate-lane or single-lane width, and pavement strengthening,<br />
improving the cross drainage. Road stretches crossing urban areas may also require<br />
upgrading to a two-lane cross section, and/or provision for drains, sidewalks and<br />
parking where required. In some cases, new alignments (by-passes) and/or realignments<br />
may also be required.<br />
The <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> (GOHP) through the <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> Road<br />
Infrastructure Development Corporation (HPRIDC) will be the executing agency for the<br />
project and establishment and infrastructure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> Public Works<br />
Department (HPPWD) shall be utilized by the HPRIDC for implementation. GOHP has<br />
engaged a highly qualified and experienced consultant to assist the HPRIDC in all<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> project preparation and implementation.<br />
The <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> has pre-selected approximately 413 km <strong>of</strong> roads<br />
for Phase-I. The project preparation will be undertaken in two Phases:<br />
Phase 1 (<strong>Project</strong> Preparation) is to provide the information and assessments necessary<br />
for World Bank appraisal <strong>of</strong> the proposed <strong>Project</strong>, including feasibility study and<br />
screening <strong>of</strong> the 1675 km <strong>of</strong> prioritized roads to finalise about 800km for inclusion in the<br />
project, preliminary design and environmental and social assessment and then final<br />
design <strong>of</strong> about 50 percent <strong>of</strong> identified project roads (413 km for<br />
upgrading/improvement), economic analysis and development <strong>of</strong> proposals for<br />
selected institutional measures to be undertaken under the <strong>Project</strong>.<br />
Phase II (<strong>Project</strong> Implementation) is including final design <strong>of</strong> the remaining roads to be<br />
included in the <strong>Project</strong>, and assistance with project implementation, co-ordination, and<br />
strengthening <strong>of</strong> engineering skills.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 24
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
The scope <strong>of</strong> this consulting service is limited to Phase I and the services to be<br />
undertaken during preparation <strong>of</strong> Phase I include:<br />
Part A: Feasibility, environmental and social studies for 1675 km <strong>of</strong> prioritized roads,<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> about 800km for inclusion in the project and preliminary engineering for<br />
about 413 km <strong>of</strong> roads for taking up in Phase 1 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Project</strong>.<br />
Part B: Carry out the detailed engineering design <strong>of</strong> about 413 km <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />
<strong>Project</strong> road works for upgrading, making extensive use <strong>of</strong> current<br />
national/international "best practices" for these types <strong>of</strong> road, including the use <strong>of</strong><br />
modern survey and design techniques (e.g. total stations, computer-aided design<br />
etc.). The designs would form the basis for the detailed cost estimates to be used in the<br />
revised economic analysis and in the assessment <strong>of</strong> the total project costs.<br />
Part C: To carry out detailed investigations, preliminary engineering design and<br />
produce General Arrangement Drawing, cost estimate <strong>of</strong> major bridge at Lathiani on<br />
Una-Aghar-Jahu road (approx. total length 825m).<br />
1.2. Roads Included In the Study<br />
The project roads are dispersed throughout the State <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> covering<br />
about 1675 km selected from the SOS study conducted by the HPPWD. Of the 1675km<br />
<strong>of</strong> roads, about 800 km will be identified for inclusion in Phase 1. Location <strong>of</strong> the priority<br />
roads is shown in Figure 1.1. A list <strong>of</strong> these priority roads is also given in Table 1.1.<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Table 1.1: List <strong>of</strong> Roads Proposed For Feasibility Study<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> Road<br />
Proposed length for<br />
up gradation (in km)<br />
1 Mehatpur Una Mubarikpur Daulatpur H.P. boundary Road<br />
32.200<br />
(Section Una to Amb)<br />
2 Una Aghar Barsar Jahu Bhambla Mandi-upto Ner Chowk road 126.270<br />
3 Theog Kothkhai Hatkoti Rohroo Chirgaon Sandhasu 98.060<br />
4 Jogindernagar Sarkaghat Ghumarwin Road (except NH 70<br />
82.980<br />
section)<br />
5 Naina Devi Kaula Da Toba 12.220<br />
6 Kumarhatti-Sarahan-Nahan (Dosarka) 78.000<br />
7 Markanda (Khajurna) bridge Suketi park Kala Amb Trilokpur 21.500<br />
8 Lal Dhank Paonta Rajban Hatkoti (Section LalDhank to Shillai<br />
74.940<br />
except NH)<br />
9 Chailla Sainj Neripul Yashwantnagar Ochhghat Kumarhatti 86.320<br />
10 Sanij Chopal Nerwa Shallu (Section Sanij to Chopal). 47.000<br />
11 Shallaghat Arki Kunihar Barotiwala 80.400<br />
12 Sainj Anni Banjar Aut (Section Sainj to Jalori and Aut to Banjar) 72.000<br />
13 Shimla Tattapani Mandi (Section Dhalli to Tatapani) 46.000<br />
14 Shimla Kunihar Ramshehar Nalagarh Ghanoli (from Nalagarh to 11.285<br />
HP Boundary)<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 25
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> Road<br />
Proposed length for<br />
up gradation (in km)<br />
15 Dharamshal Dadh Palampur Holta Chadihar Sandhol (Section<br />
33.000<br />
Dharamshala to Palampur)<br />
16 Jawalamukhi Dehra Jawali Raja-ka-Talab (Section Dehra to<br />
75.140<br />
Raja-ka-Talab)<br />
17 Mubarikpur Dehra Ranital Kotla road (Section Dehra to Ranital<br />
59.682<br />
and Ranital to Kotla)<br />
18 Nurpur Lahru Tunnuhatti 42.190<br />
19 Hamirpur Sujanpur Tihra Thural Maranda 58.990<br />
20 Shahpur Sihunta Chowari Jot Chamba Bharmour (Section<br />
53.400<br />
Draman to Chowari)<br />
21 Gaggal Chetru Dharamshala Mcleodganj (Section Gaggal to<br />
12.515<br />
Dharamshala)<br />
22 Dadh Malan 4.000<br />
23 Swarghat Naina Devi Bhakra (Section Kanchimore to Bhakra) 37.000<br />
24 Kaloha Pragpur Daliara Dadasibba Sansarpur (Section Kaloha<br />
11.200<br />
to Nehranpukhar)<br />
25 Damtal Kandrori Indora Khatiar 52.000<br />
26 Bamta Kandrour 6.660<br />
27 Bharwain Chintpurni Kandrori Damtal (Section Bharwain to<br />
32.560<br />
Sansarpur Terrace)<br />
28 Chail chowk Gohar Pandoh (Section Dadour to Gohar) 20.325<br />
29 Barsar Deothsidh (Section Barsar to Shahtalia) 11.300<br />
30 Kufri Chail Kandaghat 57.000<br />
31 Mandi Kataula Bajaura 51.000<br />
32 Bhawarna Lambagaon Jaisinghpur 26.645<br />
33 Kullu Nagar Manali (Left Bank) 39.375<br />
34 Ghatasni Bhubhu Jot Kullu 66.570<br />
35 Dharampur Kasauli 10.500<br />
36 Panjera Bharatgarh 4.660<br />
37 Panjera Dehni 9.000<br />
38 Approach to proposed Lathiani bridge 4.000<br />
39 Swarghat Bilaspur via Jagatkhana(New alignment) 20.375<br />
40 Banikhet Dalhousie Khajjiar (Section Banikhet to Dalhousie) 6.205<br />
Total 1674.467<br />
Say 1675.00<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Table 1.2: List <strong>of</strong> Roads Pre-Selected For Detailed Engineering<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> Road<br />
Proposed length for<br />
up gradation (in km)<br />
1 Mehatpur Una Mubarikpur Daulatpur H.P. boundary Road 45.200<br />
2 Una Aghar Barsar Jahu Bhambla Mandi-up to Ner Chowk road 126.270<br />
3 Theog Kothkhai Hatkoti Rohroo Chirgaon Sandhasu (Section<br />
80.730<br />
Theog to Rohru)<br />
4 Jogindernagar Sarkaghat Ghumarwin Road (except NH 70<br />
82.980<br />
section)<br />
5 Kumarhatti-Sarahan-Nahan (Dosarka) 78.000<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 26
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> Road<br />
Say<br />
Figure 1.1: Showing Phase I Roads<br />
Proposed length for<br />
up gradation (in km)<br />
412.400<br />
413 km<br />
Priority I (240km)<br />
Priority II (173 km)<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 27
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
1.3. <strong>Project</strong> Objectives<br />
In order to make rapid economic growth <strong>of</strong> the state, a design speed for the safe and<br />
efficient movement <strong>of</strong> people and goods is seen as the objective. The road design will<br />
be aiming to achieve above standard with the required cost effectiveness coupled<br />
with necessary environmental and social management considerations in achieving<br />
sustainable development <strong>of</strong> the State. The very hill roads with deep valleys and steep<br />
geologically unstable formations cause considerable unsafe for the highway users; be it<br />
pedestrians, drivers and passengers. Thus the project is to alleviate the current unsafe<br />
and congested conditions <strong>of</strong> the project road connecting the villages and towns, with<br />
one another and to the NH network for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the road users in particular and<br />
the state at large.<br />
The improvement works will consist mainly <strong>of</strong> raising the formation level, upgrading/<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> road geometrics, widening to two-lane/intermediate-lane from the<br />
existing, intermediate-lane or single-lane width, and pavement strengthening,<br />
improving the cross drainage. Road stretches crossing urban areas may also require<br />
upgrading to a two-lane cross section, and/or provision for drains, sidewalks and<br />
parking where required. In some cases, new alignments (by-passes) and/or realignments<br />
may also be required.<br />
The <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong> is being taken up with the following broad<br />
objectives:<br />
• Reduction in transport operating costs by improving the quality <strong>of</strong> the road<br />
• Reduction in journey/travel time by minimizing congestion in urban centres<br />
• Minimization <strong>of</strong> road accidents by increasing road widths, improving<br />
intersections and road geometry<br />
• Improved drainage system<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> structurally sound roads capable <strong>of</strong> achieving their design life<br />
• Increase in the local employment opportunities and poverty reduction<br />
• Improved environment and aesthetic value <strong>of</strong> the road<br />
• Use <strong>of</strong> bioengineering in road for slope protection<br />
• Improvement <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> the people in the state<br />
1.4. <strong>Project</strong> Components<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> components are envisaged in the project under HPSRP. Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
important <strong>Project</strong> components planned to be taken up are the following:<br />
• Raising the formation level <strong>of</strong> the road<br />
• Upgrading/ improvement <strong>of</strong> road geometrics<br />
• Widening to two-lane/intermediate-lane from the existing, intermediate-lane or<br />
single-lane width<br />
• pavement strengthening<br />
• improving the cross drainage<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 28
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• Road stretches crossing urban areas may also require upgrading to a two-lane<br />
cross section, and/or provision for drains, sidewalks and parking<br />
• New alignments (by-passes) and/or re-alignments<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> signage and road marking for additional safety and convenience to<br />
the road users<br />
1.5. Need for Resettlement Action Plan<br />
Road improvement works include widening and realignment <strong>of</strong> the road at some<br />
locations and this involves expropriation <strong>of</strong> land from the current owners/users. The<br />
expropriation <strong>of</strong> land necessitates the eviction <strong>of</strong> squatters and encroachers from<br />
within the RoW and acquisition <strong>of</strong> land and structure from the titleholders. Acquisition <strong>of</strong><br />
land and property will cause social disruption and economic loss for <strong>Project</strong> Affected<br />
Persons (PAPs) and their families. It is therefore important that disturbance and loss to<br />
PAPs due to project are minimized through proper planning. Wherever the impacts can<br />
not be avoided, a document need to be prepared named Resettlement Action Plan<br />
aims to ensure that all affected parties are compensated and assisted in restoring their<br />
livelihood. In addition this, resettlement action plan is required in conformance with<br />
national law and World Bank safeguard policy.<br />
1.5.1. OBJECTIVES OF RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN<br />
The objective <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> the resettlement and rehabilitation action plan has<br />
been to create a baseline database containing the features and populace in the<br />
immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong> proposed road works to be undertaken as well as the structures<br />
likely to be affected by the road widening and up-grading process. The report while<br />
highlighting the social problems also suggests general and typical mitigation measures<br />
to remove social problems the PAPs are expected to experience, loss <strong>of</strong> livelihood,<br />
displacement and loss <strong>of</strong> access to community facilities etc. The specific objectives <strong>of</strong><br />
the R&R plan have been as follows:<br />
• Identify PAPs by type and extent <strong>of</strong> loss;<br />
• Identify the possible adverse effects <strong>of</strong> the project on the people and the area;<br />
and,<br />
• Suggest culturally and economically appropriate measures for mitigation <strong>of</strong><br />
adverse effects <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> institutional mechanism for implementation <strong>of</strong> R&R plan<br />
• Provision for grievance redress mechanism<br />
• A time frame for implementation <strong>of</strong> R&R plan<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> budget for each activity <strong>of</strong> R&R plan, and<br />
• Monitoring and evaluation <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> R&R plan<br />
1.6. The report<br />
There has been some modification in list <strong>of</strong> roads (table 1.2) proposed for improvement<br />
under HPSRP. The new list <strong>of</strong> roads proposed under the HPSRP is presented in table 1.3.<br />
The list has been grouped in to Phase I & II and this report deals with Phase I corridors<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 29
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
(235 km) out <strong>of</strong> 443 km <strong>of</strong> the proposed <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong> and only<br />
some additional information on approximate figure <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> families getting<br />
affected in Phase II roads. The corridor name and length for Phase I and II is given in<br />
table 1.3.<br />
Table 1.3: Roads covered under RAP report<br />
Sr. No. Name <strong>of</strong> Road<br />
length (in km)<br />
1 Mehatpur Una Mubarikpur Daulatpur H.P. boundary Road 45.500<br />
2 Una Aghar Barsar Jahu Bhambla Mandi-upto Ner Chowk road 109.00<br />
3 Theog Kothkhai Hatkoti Rohroo 80.500<br />
Sub-Total Phase I 235<br />
4 Jogindernagar Sarkaghat Ghumarwin Road (Section Ghumarwin-<br />
Sarkaghat)<br />
37.0<br />
5 Kumarhatti-Sarahan-Nahan (Dosarka) 73.0<br />
6 Shahpur Sihunta Chowari Jot Chamba Bharmour (Section Draman to 23.0<br />
7 Mubarikpur Dehra Ranital Kotla road (Section Ranital to Kotla) 39.0<br />
8 Bhawarna Lambagaon Jaisinghpur 36.0<br />
Sub-Total Phase II 208<br />
Grand Total 443<br />
The present report is a consolidated one highlighting the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the project area, its<br />
possible impact on the socio-economic conditions <strong>of</strong> the people, process <strong>of</strong> land<br />
acquisition, entitlement <strong>of</strong> the affected persons and an action plan incorporating<br />
mitigating measures to overcome the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> the project on the impacted<br />
people and also to ensure restoration <strong>of</strong> their livelihood in a timely fashion.<br />
1.7. Scope <strong>of</strong> the Resettlement Action Plan<br />
The RAP draws heavily from the census and socio-economic survey <strong>of</strong> project affected<br />
people undertaken as part <strong>of</strong> the comprehensive database development in addition<br />
to other secondary sources specifically in cross inking the various government schemes<br />
with the income and livelihood restoration <strong>of</strong> project affected population. The RAP is<br />
organised into sections as follows:<br />
Chapter Two: describes the methodology and steps adopted in whole process <strong>of</strong><br />
preparing RAP;<br />
Chapter Three: provides the detailed description <strong>of</strong> existing laws and regulations<br />
applicable to the project from social sector perspective and World Bank group<br />
safeguard policy, project entitlement policy, definition <strong>of</strong> various terms used in the<br />
policy and entitlement frame work;<br />
Chapter Four: deals with the total project affected population including their socioeconomic<br />
characteristics, loss type, extent <strong>of</strong> loss, asset ownership, resettlement<br />
options;<br />
Chapter Five: describes the impact on women and vulnerable group population in<br />
total project affected populations;<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 30
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Chapter Six: details the various measures adopted to minimise the social impact in<br />
project;<br />
Chapter Seven: describes the public consultation and disclosure process and activities<br />
<strong>of</strong> RAP;<br />
Chapter Eight: set out the grievance redress mechanism for the project affected<br />
people to address their grievances related to individual or group issues;<br />
Chapter Nine: outline the institutional arrangement for RAP implementation along with<br />
the details <strong>of</strong> implementation responsibilities;<br />
Chapter Ten: describes the highway related disease and its spread in national and<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> level, cause and consequences <strong>of</strong> spread and project level<br />
intervention.<br />
Chapter Eleven: describes the various income restoration measures included in the<br />
project policy to support the transitional phase and skill up-gadation and government<br />
schemes to take advantage for restoration <strong>of</strong> livelihood;<br />
Chapter Twelve: outline the implementation schedule <strong>of</strong> RAP keeping in mind the time<br />
consuming process <strong>of</strong> land acquisition and civil construction;<br />
Chapter Thirteen: details PAP costs and the budget for implementation; and<br />
Chapter Fourteen: outline the monitoring and evaluation mechanism for the RAP,<br />
including the provision <strong>of</strong> external evaluation.<br />
In addition, a number <strong>of</strong> annexes are provided to support the main text.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 31
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 2: STUDY METHODOLOGY<br />
2.1 Introduction<br />
The Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the <strong>Project</strong> Affected Persons (PAPs) has been<br />
prepared on the basis <strong>of</strong> information collected in respect to the people affected by<br />
the projects and also the area coming under the affected zone. In order to capture<br />
data for the present exercise, both Primary as well as Secondary sources were<br />
systematically tapped. Socio-economic survey has been conducted in the Corridor <strong>of</strong><br />
Impact zone to identify the affected persons and list out the adverse impacts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project, secondary sources information were collected from a number <strong>of</strong> quarters such<br />
as from Census data, Statistical hand book, <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the PWD, land records from<br />
revenue department and a host <strong>of</strong> other literature. Thus, the secondary sources<br />
information complemented the primary data elicited through field survey from the<br />
affected people and other stakeholders. Since the Socio-Economic Survey is the basis<br />
<strong>of</strong> RAP preparation, it is imperative to describe the various stages <strong>of</strong> the exercise.<br />
2.2 Resettlement Plan Preparation Process<br />
The study depended extensively on primary data collected through census, socioeconomic<br />
survey and qualitative inputs through consultations and discussions with<br />
PAPs, local villagers and <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> the PWD and also FGDs in the impacted areas etc.<br />
The entire exercise was done in a consultative process with the impacted persons and<br />
other key stakeholders. The Socio-Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Project</strong> Affected<br />
Persons was done following the below mentioned steps for preparation <strong>of</strong> the RAP:<br />
Step 1<br />
With the help <strong>of</strong> the Social Scientists and the field surveyor, the potential R&R issues in<br />
each section <strong>of</strong> the road were recorded and at this stage the sections <strong>of</strong> roads having<br />
social impact and type <strong>of</strong> impacts were identified.<br />
Step 2<br />
The right <strong>of</strong> way status <strong>of</strong> the road was obtained from the local PWD <strong>of</strong>fices and this<br />
was verified through land records from revenue department. The right <strong>of</strong> way<br />
information was important in knowing the land available for widening, and land<br />
acquisition requirements.<br />
Step 3<br />
The preliminary design with various alternatives prepared by the engineering team was<br />
verified by the social team on site. Special emphasis was given at the locations <strong>of</strong><br />
realignment sections, deviation from the existing alignment and bypass sections.<br />
Consultation, village meetings, community meetings, focus group consultations were<br />
held at these locations to elicit the reaction and responses <strong>of</strong> the people to the<br />
preliminary design. The findings <strong>of</strong> these consultations were communicated to the<br />
engineering team to make necessary adjustments, changes to accommodate the<br />
views and suggestions <strong>of</strong> the community. Wherever the engineering team could not<br />
accommodate the community or affected people’s suggestion shall provide<br />
justifications for each location which will be communicated to the stakeholders to build<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 32
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
confidence in the project. The suggestions accommodated in the design will also be<br />
communicated to the stakeholders.<br />
Step 4<br />
A combined field visit was made by the state PWD <strong>of</strong>ficials, local PWD staffs along the<br />
consultants engineering, social and environmental team with preliminary design to<br />
decide upon various alignment options for phase I roads. The team looked in to all the<br />
possible options, held discussions with the community, group, and individuals while<br />
giving shape to the road alignment. The PWD team was consisting <strong>of</strong> Engineer-in-Chief,<br />
Chief Engineer, <strong>Project</strong> Director, local Superintendent Engineer, Executive Engineer,<br />
and Assistant Engineers. The local PWD staffs were provided with the preliminary design<br />
in advance for review, so that their views and experience could be capture in the<br />
project design. This exercise helped significantly in addressing many local issues and<br />
people had a chance to communicate directly with the high <strong>of</strong>ficials and project<br />
authority to put forward their demand, views and request.<br />
Step 5<br />
Integration <strong>of</strong> combined field out put into the design by the engineering team to<br />
improve the acceptability <strong>of</strong> the road design from social and environmental point <strong>of</strong><br />
view while keeping the basics <strong>of</strong> design concept to the international practice.<br />
Step 6<br />
The process <strong>of</strong> design improvement and minimisation <strong>of</strong> social impact is a process has<br />
been tried in every step in project preparation. The design finalised after the combined<br />
effort <strong>of</strong> consultant and depart has been the base for the assessment <strong>of</strong> social impact.<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> this design, a detailed survey <strong>of</strong> affected population has been<br />
completed.<br />
The census survey covered 100 % <strong>of</strong> the affected population within the corridor <strong>of</strong><br />
Impact zone. Following the designs, those within the corridor <strong>of</strong> impact were<br />
considered eligible for support under the project. The existing centre line provided the<br />
benchmark line to survey on either side. Census data provided the basis for establishing<br />
a cut-<strong>of</strong>f date for non-title holders in order to determine who may be entitled to<br />
relocation assistance or other benefits from the project.<br />
The census registered the owners’ name, address, and legal document if any towards<br />
the claim <strong>of</strong> the property. All household members and individuals within the potential<br />
CoI; their assets and incomes and sufficient demographic and social information were<br />
used to determine whether they are to be categorised as vulnerable groups with<br />
special entitlements under the project. Private land owners, tenants and squatters and<br />
encroaches within the ROW were covered in the census. Social Census team was<br />
responsible for measuring the potentially affected structure perpendicular and along<br />
the road to record the size and shape <strong>of</strong> the structure. Each structure was measured<br />
and location was recorded. The socio-economic survey, which was also carried out on<br />
census basis, provided the baseline against which mitigation measures and support<br />
have been measured in the RAP. The analysis also covered the needs and resources <strong>of</strong><br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 33
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
different groups and individuals, including inter and intra-household analysis and<br />
gender analysis.<br />
In this stage also while doing the complete census survey, locations where with minor<br />
adjustment or shifting <strong>of</strong> proposed centreline by couple <strong>of</strong> meters could save some<br />
properties and reduce the social impact were identified. This is like fine tuning the<br />
design to minimise the project impact. Such locations were identified and discussed<br />
with the design team.<br />
Step 7<br />
After the response from the design team on the suggestions <strong>of</strong> social team’s finding<br />
during census and socio-economic survey, the actual number <strong>of</strong> PAFs were identified<br />
on the basis <strong>of</strong> readjustment. For finding legal owners, encroachers and squatters,<br />
revenue records were used for verification <strong>of</strong> legal ROW and the boundaries <strong>of</strong><br />
properties likely to be within the CoI. With the completion <strong>of</strong> final drawings, only those<br />
within the CoI were considered eligible for entitlement under the project and list <strong>of</strong> PAFs<br />
was generated.<br />
Step 8<br />
In the last stage <strong>of</strong> process is preparation <strong>of</strong> RAP documentation includes analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
data collected through census and socio-economic survey, grievance redress<br />
mechanism, institutional arrangement for RAP implementation, income restoration<br />
plan, budgetary provision, implementation schedule, monitoring and evaluation<br />
mechanism etc. have been incorporated for successful implementation <strong>of</strong> R&R<br />
process.<br />
2.3 Tools Used for the Study<br />
In the study, a number <strong>of</strong> tools were used to collect data using the following tools:<br />
I. Schedule Method (Census Survey, Socio-Economic Survey) copy <strong>of</strong> the Schedule is<br />
presented as Annexure-I.<br />
II. Interview Method (Key Informants and Key Stakeholders Interview)<br />
III. Focused Group Discussion (FGD)<br />
IV. Village Meetings<br />
Although the above indicated tools were mainly used for collecting empirical data in<br />
this study, yet it is necessary to discuss how the Census Exercise & verification <strong>of</strong> social<br />
data and the Socio Economic Survey was conducted to elicit realistic information<br />
about the project affected people and the area.<br />
2.4 Consultation Methodology<br />
Public consultations were conducted for minimizing adverse social impacts. The<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> these consultations was to obtain the views and suggestions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
potentially affected persons on the road design and its potential impacts on the<br />
affected people. The affected persons were consulted as “focus groups” such as a<br />
group <strong>of</strong> affected residents, a group <strong>of</strong> affected agricultural families and a group <strong>of</strong><br />
affected shop owners or traders. There are also interest groups that have very <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 34
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
come up with good alternative suggestions on the road alignment that have helped in<br />
re-designing them to reduce any adverse impacts on the people.<br />
Public consultations mainly acted as a forum to inform people about the project and<br />
also to elicit their opinion on the social provisions detailed in the project. Information<br />
dissemination on resettlement and rehabilitation provisions <strong>of</strong> the project, proposed<br />
road widths and alignments, role <strong>of</strong> the community, grievance redress etc., were given<br />
due importance. Issues pertaining to land acquisition, compensation, assistances to<br />
vulnerable groups, commercial, residential titleholders and tenants were also discussed<br />
with the community. Special care was taken during the study to hold focused group<br />
discussions exclusively with women group to elicit the adverse effects they are<br />
anticipating due to the project and their suggestions in this regard for mitigating the<br />
foreseeable adverse effects. Consultation was done at both individual and group level.<br />
Again consultations were carried out at Local level (village), District level and also at<br />
State Level.<br />
2.4.1. LOCAL LEVEL CONSULTATION<br />
For local level consultations, villages were selected from the following categories:<br />
• Villages inhabited by population below poverty line and poor infrastructure facilities<br />
• Villages inhabited by scheduled caste population<br />
• Villages inhabited by population above poverty line and with adequate<br />
infrastructure facilities<br />
Women Community Organizers led by a Qualitative Data Expert consulted with the<br />
potentially affected population in various groups such as women, male, residential and<br />
commercial. Care was taken to ensure that each group is not larger than 15 persons.<br />
Before initiating the Group Discussion, social and resource maps were prepared by the<br />
villagers This also helped in building rapport with the villagers which helped in finalizing<br />
issues like proposed location <strong>of</strong> bypasses, bus stops, relocation <strong>of</strong> religious structures,<br />
etc. List <strong>of</strong> villages where local level consultations were held is provided in chapter 6<br />
(Public Information Campaign).<br />
2.4.2. DISTRICT LEVEL CONSULTATION<br />
The objective <strong>of</strong> district level consultations is to create awareness about the project<br />
among the people, district administration, and <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> line departments and NGOs<br />
working in the district and particularly along the project road. At district level, one<br />
group consultation will be conducted with representation from all stakeholders, key<br />
functionaries <strong>of</strong> the government associated with the project, people’s representative<br />
representing the affected area, key <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> government from different line<br />
departments associated with development activities/income generating activities. The<br />
anticipated adverse effects <strong>of</strong> the project on the people and area identified and<br />
possible interventions to mitigate the adverse effects will be discussed. Besides,<br />
individual consultation level will be limited to some key persons who are responsible in<br />
decision making including the people’s representative.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 35
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
2.4.3. STATE LEVEL CONSULTATION<br />
The state level consultation will be conducted under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the Public<br />
Works Department Secretary wherein the Engineer in Chief, Chief Engineers <strong>of</strong> PWD,<br />
other Officials and key functionaries and stakeholders associated with the decision<br />
making process will be invited to participate and consult on various social and R&R<br />
issues and strategy for implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP with a view to minimize the adverse<br />
effects and to restore the livelihood <strong>of</strong> those who are losing life support system.<br />
2.4.4. COLLECTION OF DATA FROM SECONDARY SOURCES:<br />
Through out the study, various types <strong>of</strong> secondary data were used along with the<br />
primary data. The main sources from which secondary sources data has been<br />
collected to complement the primary data in the present exercise are:<br />
• Directorate <strong>of</strong> Census Operations<br />
• Revenue Department (Land Records)<br />
• Office <strong>of</strong> the Chief Engineer PWD<br />
• Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics<br />
• Review <strong>of</strong> Literature from Libraries and Research Institutions<br />
2.5. Bypass/ Realignments and Identification <strong>of</strong> Affected Persons<br />
In the present exercise, an attempt was made to consider the alternatives, which<br />
relates to modification in geometric design, horizontal alignment to minimize land<br />
acquisition, structural demolition and felling <strong>of</strong> trees. Design changes were also<br />
followed wherever there is congestion and large-scale population settlements. As a<br />
consequence <strong>of</strong> efforts for change <strong>of</strong> alignment and even design changes, the<br />
magnitude <strong>of</strong> effect reduced and minimum level <strong>of</strong> displacement will be required in<br />
the project. However, the bypass alignment has effectively minimized the magnitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> adverse effects on human population and has reduced number <strong>of</strong> affected persons<br />
substantially.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 36
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 3 - R & R PRINCIPLES, POLICY FRAME WORK AND<br />
ENTITLEMENT MATRIX<br />
This chapter <strong>of</strong> the report discusses about the existing law and regulations <strong>of</strong> the<br />
country and state those are applicable to the proposed project. It is imperative to<br />
analyse the Acts and bylaws to understand the legalities and procedures in<br />
implementing project and identifying the gaps and area where there is a need for<br />
strengthening to comply with the World Bank policy on resettlement and rehabilitation<br />
<strong>of</strong> project affected persons and indigenous population development plan. The<br />
following subsections summarized the legislative framework in which the projects will be<br />
implemented with respect to the social issues as well as World Bank policy on<br />
resettlement & rehabilitation and indigenous population. The preparation <strong>of</strong> a separate<br />
resettlement and rehabilitation policy is supplement to the existing laws in addressing<br />
various social and resettlement issues arises out <strong>of</strong> project implementation.<br />
3.1. Analysis <strong>of</strong> existing regulations:<br />
3.1.1. LAND ACQUISITION ACT 1894<br />
Land Acquisition Act is the instrument for acquiring land by the government for the<br />
public purpose. The main features <strong>of</strong> the Act are:<br />
• Public Purpose is ascertained according to the objectives and its several<br />
connotations depending upon the State (Section 3f).<br />
• Land needed for any public purpose & publication <strong>of</strong> notification & last date <strong>of</strong> such<br />
public notice be referred to as publication <strong>of</strong> notification (Section 4)<br />
• Objections to be made within stipulated time frame (30 days) after notification &<br />
objections.<br />
• Award by Collector to be made within a period <strong>of</strong> two years from date <strong>of</strong><br />
publication <strong>of</strong> declaration and if no award is made within that period, the entire<br />
proceedings for the acquisition <strong>of</strong> the land will lapse (Section 11A).<br />
• Reference to court <strong>of</strong> not accepting award, which has to be done within 6 weeks <strong>of</strong><br />
the award. Disagreement may relate to measurement <strong>of</strong> land, amount <strong>of</strong><br />
compensation, the persons to whom it is payable. (Section 18).<br />
• Compensation based on market value, damage sustained by person interested in<br />
case <strong>of</strong> standing crops, at the time <strong>of</strong> collectors taking possession <strong>of</strong> the land by<br />
reason <strong>of</strong> severing <strong>of</strong> such land from his other land., damage to movable<br />
/immovable property & diminution <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its from land (Section 23) & an<br />
additional30% solatium.<br />
• In cases <strong>of</strong> “urgency” land to be acquired within 15 days <strong>of</strong> public notification such<br />
land will be vested absolutely in the government free from all<br />
encumbrances.(Section 17).<br />
The Act suffers from the basic deficiencies which does not meet the World Bank<br />
requirements. The important limitations are:<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 37
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• No recognition usufruct right<br />
• Market value based on average <strong>of</strong> registration value<br />
• No special provision for vulnerable group<br />
• Compensation only for lost asset, land, tree etc. no consideration for loss <strong>of</strong><br />
livelihood<br />
• Does not recognized the encroachers using land for livelihood<br />
• Rehabilitation not made mandatory.<br />
• No special provision for indigenous population<br />
• Affected persons are not consulted only they can raise objection within certain<br />
time frame<br />
3.1.2. NATIONAL POLICY ON RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION<br />
The <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India (GOI) in February 2004 approved a National Policy on<br />
Resettlement and Rehabilitation (NPRR). It recognizes the following essential features:<br />
• That project affected families (PAF) not only lose their lands, other assets and<br />
livelihoods, they also experience adverse psychological and social/cultural<br />
consequences;<br />
• The need to minimize large-scale displacement and where displacement is<br />
inevitable, resettlement and rehabilitation has to be handled with utmost care.<br />
This is especially necessary for tribal, small and marginal farmers and women;<br />
• That cash compensation alone is <strong>of</strong>ten inadequate to replace lost agricultural<br />
land, homesteads and other resources. Landless labourers, forest dwellers,<br />
tenants, artisans are not eligible for cash compensation;<br />
• The need to provide relief especially to the rural poor (with no assets), small and<br />
marginal farmers, SCs/STs and women;<br />
• The importance <strong>of</strong> dialogue between PAFs and the administration responsible<br />
for resettlement for smoother implementation <strong>of</strong> projects and R &R.<br />
• The policy is in the form <strong>of</strong> broad guidelines and executive instructions and will<br />
be applicable to projects displacing 500 families or more in plain areas and 250<br />
families or more in hilly areas. The NPRR does not meet some <strong>of</strong> the World Bank’s<br />
resettlement policy’s key requirements. Firstly, the NPRR states that in<br />
acquisitions for highways, railway lines, transmission lines and pipelines, projectaffected<br />
families will be <strong>of</strong>fered an ex-gratia payment <strong>of</strong> Rs 10,000 and no other<br />
resettlement and rehabilitation benefits. Secondly, the cut-<strong>of</strong>f numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
affected persons for whom World Bank requires resettlement plans are much<br />
lower. Thirdly, replacement value is not clearly defined and more importantly is<br />
not taken into account in the various lump-sum compensation payments that<br />
have been decreed in the policy. Fourthly, no specific entitlements have been<br />
provided for untitled persons such as squatters and encroachers. However, the<br />
policy does recognize some significant principles. It requires projects to (a)<br />
minimize displacement and to identify non-displacing or least-displacing<br />
alternatives; (b) plan the resettlement and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> PAPs including<br />
special needs <strong>of</strong> tribal and vulnerable sections; (c) provide a better standard <strong>of</strong><br />
living to PAFs; and (d) facilitate harmonious relationships between the requiring<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 38
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
body and PAFs through mutual cooperation. A National Monitoring Committee<br />
will be set up comprising the Secretary Land Resources (Chair), Secretary<br />
Planning Commission, Secretary Social Justice and Empowerment, Secretary<br />
Water Resources, Secretary Tribal Affairs, Secretary Railways, Secretary Power<br />
and Secretary Coal. In addition a National Monitoring Cell will be established n<br />
the Department <strong>of</strong> Land Resources in the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Rural Development under a<br />
Joint Secretary, assisted by zonal directors, subject matter specialists, deputy<br />
directors and other support staff.<br />
3.2. World Bank Requirement<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> the World Bank Policy on Involuntary Resettlement is to avoid or minimized<br />
the impacts on people, households, businesses and others affected by the land<br />
acquisition required by the project. The main objectives and principles <strong>of</strong> the policy<br />
are:<br />
• Involuntary resettlement should be avoided or minimized where feasible,<br />
exploring all viable alternative project designs. For example, realignment <strong>of</strong><br />
roads or reductions in dam height may significantly reduce resettlement needs.<br />
• Where displacement is unavoidable, resettlement plans should be developed.<br />
All involuntary resettlement should be conceived and executed as<br />
development programs, with resettlers provided sufficient investment resources<br />
and opportunities to share in project benefits. Displaced persons should be (i)<br />
compensated for their losses at full replacement cost prior to the actual move;<br />
(ii) assisted with the move and supported during the transition period in the<br />
resettlement site; and (iii) assisted in their efforts to improve their former living<br />
standards, income earning capacity, and production levels, or at least to restore<br />
them. Particular attention should be paid to the needs <strong>of</strong> the poorest groups to<br />
be resettled.<br />
• Community participation in planning and implementing resettlement should be<br />
encouraged. Appropriate patterns <strong>of</strong> social organization should be established,<br />
and existing social and cultural institutions <strong>of</strong> resettlers and their hosts should be<br />
supported and used to the greatest extent possible.<br />
• Resettlers should be integrated socially and economically into host communities<br />
so that adverse impacts on host communities are minimized. The best way <strong>of</strong><br />
achieving this integration is for resettlement to be planned in areas benefiting<br />
from the project and through consultation with the future hosts.<br />
• Land, housing, infrastructure, and other compensation should be provided to<br />
the adversely affected population, indigenous groups, ethnic minorities, and<br />
pastoralists who may have usufruct or customary rights to the land or other<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 39
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
resources taken for the project. The absence <strong>of</strong> legal title to land by such groups<br />
should not be a bar to compensation.<br />
3.3. The Need for Separate Policy:<br />
The existing state Acts/Laws/Bills that are to be applicable to the project form the social<br />
issues point <strong>of</strong> view have some or other gaps that do not comply with the World Bank<br />
policy on Resettlement and Rehabilitation. As a result, a policy framework for the<br />
people adversely affected by the project needs to be developed to address the social<br />
issues induced by the project. Both these policy framework has been developed to<br />
maximise the project benefit by addressing and mitigating the negative impacts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project.<br />
3.4. Broad Principles <strong>of</strong> the HPSRP R&R Policy<br />
This policy document describes the principles and approach to be followed in<br />
minimizing and mitigating negative social and economic impacts by the projects. The<br />
guidelines are prepared for addressing the issues limited to this projects for<br />
resettlement and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> the PAPs. The Resettlement Plan has been<br />
developed based on guidelines <strong>of</strong> World Bank on Involuntary Resettlement. The RAP<br />
will be implemented by the state government through its department with the<br />
assistance <strong>of</strong> NGO or any such implementing agency. The broad principles <strong>of</strong> HP R&R<br />
policy is discussed below and detail definitation, legal frame work, calculation <strong>of</strong><br />
replacement value, categories <strong>of</strong> impacts and broad entitlement framework is<br />
givenin Annexture II.<br />
3.4.1. BROAD PRINCIPLES<br />
The broad principles <strong>of</strong> the R&R are as below:<br />
The negative impact on persons affected by the project would be avoided or<br />
minimized.<br />
Where the negative impacts are unavoidable, the project-affected persons will be<br />
assisted in improving or regaining their standard <strong>of</strong> living. Vulnerable groups will be<br />
identified and assisted to improve their standard <strong>of</strong> living.<br />
All information related to resettlement preparation and implementation will be<br />
disclosed to all concerned, and people’s participation is being ensured in planning<br />
and implementation <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
All acquisition <strong>of</strong> land would be under LA Act, 1894, which provides for<br />
compensation for properties to be acquired. Compensation will be paid at the<br />
replacement value <strong>of</strong> the property. The persons affected by the project who does<br />
not own land or other properties but who have economic interest or lose their<br />
livelihoods will be assisted as per the broad principles brought out in this policy.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the widening and strengthening work will take place by the side <strong>of</strong> the<br />
existing Highway except at locations where the existing alignment may involve<br />
shifting to accommodate bypasses, geometric and other cost effective<br />
improvements.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 40
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Before taking possession <strong>of</strong> the acquired lands and properties, compensation and<br />
R&R assistance will be made in accordance with this policy.<br />
There would be no/or minimum adverse social, economic and environmental<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> displacement on the host communities but if needed specific measures<br />
would be provided in the Resettlement Plan.<br />
Broad entitlement framework <strong>of</strong> different categories <strong>of</strong> project-affected people has<br />
been assessed and is given in the entitlement matrix. Provisions will be kept in the<br />
budget for those who were not present at the time <strong>of</strong> enumeration. However,<br />
anyone moving into the project area after the cut-<strong>of</strong>f date will not be entitled to<br />
assistance.<br />
Appropriate grievance redress mechanism will be established at the district level to<br />
ensure speedy resolution <strong>of</strong> disputes.<br />
All activities related to resettlement planning, implementation, and monitoring<br />
would ensure involvement <strong>of</strong> women. Efforts will also be made to ensure that<br />
vulnerable groups are included.<br />
All consultations with PAPs shall be documented. Consultations will continue during<br />
the implementation <strong>of</strong> resettlement and rehabilitation works.<br />
The Resettlement Plan shall include a fully itemized budget and an implementation<br />
schedule linked to the civil works contract.<br />
3.4.2. ENTITLEMENT MATRIX<br />
The Entitlement Matrix provides category-wise details regarding the entitlements in<br />
relation to the R&R principles enumerated above. The following table presents the<br />
entitlement matrix for the project:<br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
1A Private Agricultur<br />
Property al land<br />
and assets<br />
Table 3.1: Detailed Entitlement Matrix<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Titleholder<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
Compensation at “replacement cost”<br />
Impact Category: Losing Less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
holding and remaining land is above MEH (more<br />
than 5 bighas).<br />
1. Compensation will be paid at the replacement<br />
cost.<br />
Impact Category: Losing more than 20% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
holding remaining land holding is above MEH<br />
1. Compensation will be paid at the replacement<br />
cost.<br />
2. Training for skill up-gradation<br />
3. ERG up to Rs. 24,000 for vulnerable groups<br />
Impact Category: If remaining land after<br />
acquisition is below MEH, EP will be entitled to<br />
• Compensation will be paid at the replacement<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 41
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
cost.<br />
• If EP is from vulnerable group, compensation for<br />
the entire land is by means <strong>of</strong> land for land if so<br />
wished by EP provided that the land <strong>of</strong> equal or<br />
more productive value is available.<br />
• Compensation is given for the entire plot<br />
including residual plot, if the owner <strong>of</strong> such land<br />
wishes that the project authority should also<br />
acquire his residual plot. The project authority<br />
will acquire the residual plot so paid.<br />
Transitional allowance to be calculated at the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> Rs. 70 per day for 24 days if land loss is<br />
less than 10% <strong>of</strong> the total holding, for 48 days if<br />
loss is between 10 to 20%, for 72 days if loss is<br />
between 20 to 50% and 100 days if loss is more<br />
than 50% <strong>of</strong> total holding.<br />
• All fees, taxes and other charges, as<br />
applicable under the relevant laws, incurred in<br />
the relocation and resource establishment, are<br />
to be borne by the project.<br />
• Training would be provided for upgradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> skills on RDD pattern<br />
• One-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant in<br />
the form <strong>of</strong> productive assets to vulnerable<br />
group<br />
• Able bodied PAPs will be given preference<br />
for employment with contractor for semi skilled<br />
/ unskilled subject to fulfilling the requisite<br />
criteria / qualification.<br />
Absentee landlords will be only entitled for<br />
compensation at replacement value.<br />
1B<br />
Private<br />
Property<br />
Nonagricultur<br />
al land<br />
and assets<br />
Titleholder /<br />
owner:<br />
Residential<br />
Compensation at “replacement cost”<br />
Impact Category: Loss <strong>of</strong> structure less than 20% <strong>of</strong><br />
the total size <strong>of</strong> the structure and structure remains<br />
viable<br />
1. EP will be provided replacement cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />
residential structure, which will be<br />
calculated as per the prevailing basic schedule<br />
<strong>of</strong> rates without depreciation, subject to<br />
relevant “quality standards” <strong>of</strong> BSR as<br />
maintained by <strong>Government</strong>/Local Bodies<br />
Authorities.<br />
2. Compensation for the loss <strong>of</strong> residential land will<br />
be paid at replacement value<br />
3. Right to salvage materials from the demolished<br />
structure<br />
Impact Category: Loss <strong>of</strong> structure more than 20%<br />
and remaining structure becomes unviable<br />
Apart from entitlements as described above, such<br />
EPs will also be entitled for<br />
5. A lump sum rental allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3000 in rural<br />
areas and Rs. 6000 in urban areas.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 42
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
6. A lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if<br />
within the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000<br />
if outside the affected village or municipality or<br />
new destination is more than 2 Km.<br />
7. A free plot <strong>of</strong> 40 to 70 sq. meter and<br />
construction allowance equal to amount given<br />
under Indira Awas Yojana for houseless<br />
vulnerable groups. For the non-vulnerable<br />
group, plots will be made available on cost<br />
basis.<br />
8. Able bodied PAPs will be given preference for<br />
employment with contractor for semi skilled /<br />
unskilled subject to fulfilling the requisite criteria<br />
/ qualification.<br />
Absentee landlords will receive only the<br />
compensation at “replacement cost”.<br />
1C<br />
Private<br />
Property<br />
Nonagricultur<br />
al land<br />
and assets<br />
Titleholder /<br />
owner:<br />
Commercial<br />
Compensation at “replacement cost”<br />
Impact Category: Loss <strong>of</strong> structure less than 20% <strong>of</strong><br />
the total size <strong>of</strong> the structure and structure remains<br />
viable<br />
1. EP will be provided replacement cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />
commercial structure, which will be calculated<br />
as per the prevailing basic schedule <strong>of</strong> rates<br />
without depreciation, subject to relevant<br />
“quality standards” <strong>of</strong> BSR as maintained by<br />
<strong>Government</strong>/Local Bodies Authorities.<br />
2. Compensation for the loss <strong>of</strong> commercial land<br />
will be paid at replacement value<br />
3. One time grant <strong>of</strong> Rs, 1500 as Transitional<br />
allowance<br />
4. Right to salvage materials from the demolished<br />
structure.<br />
Impact Category: If EP is displaced<br />
Apart from entitlements as described above, such<br />
EPs will also be entitled for<br />
1. A lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if<br />
within the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000<br />
if outside the affected village or municipality or<br />
new destination is more than 2 Km.<br />
2. Training would be provided for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
skills<br />
3. A plot <strong>of</strong> 25 sq. m on cost basis<br />
4. All vulnerable EP’s loosing commercial structure<br />
shall be entitled for ERG in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
productive assets. If such vulnerable EP is<br />
displaced, he shall also be entitled for 25 sqmt.<br />
<strong>of</strong> plot free <strong>of</strong> cost, provided such EP is landless.<br />
However, if such EP owns land somewhere else<br />
and insists for plot, he will be provided 25 sqmt.<br />
plot on market price.<br />
5. Able bodied PAPs will be given preference for<br />
employment with contractor for semi skilled /<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 43
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
unskilled subject to fulfilling the requisite criteria<br />
/ qualification Absentee landlords will receive<br />
only the compensation at “replacement cost”.<br />
ID<br />
Private<br />
Property<br />
Nonagricultur<br />
al land<br />
and assets<br />
Tenant:<br />
Residential<br />
1. The amount <strong>of</strong> deposit or advance payment<br />
paid by the tenant to the landlord or the<br />
remaining amount at the time <strong>of</strong> expropriation.<br />
(This will be deducted from the payment to the<br />
landlord).<br />
2. A lump sum rental allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3000 in rural<br />
areas and Rs. 6000 in urban areas 3.<br />
Compensation for any structure the tenant has<br />
erected on the property. (This will be<br />
deducted from the payment to the landlord).<br />
4. A lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if<br />
within the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000<br />
if outside the affected village or municipality or<br />
new destination is more than 2 Km.<br />
1E<br />
Private<br />
Property<br />
Nonagricultur<br />
al land<br />
and assets<br />
Tenant:<br />
Commercial<br />
1. The amount <strong>of</strong> deposit or advance payment<br />
paid by the tenant to the landlord or the<br />
remaining amount at the time <strong>of</strong> expropriation.<br />
(This will be deducted from the payment to the<br />
landlord).<br />
2. A lump sum rental allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3000 in rural<br />
areas and Rs. 6000 in urban areas.<br />
3. Compensation for any structure the tenant has<br />
erected on the property. (This will be<br />
deducted from the payment to the landlord).<br />
4. Lump sum Shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if within<br />
the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000 if<br />
outside the affected village or municipality or<br />
new destination is more than 2 Km.<br />
5. Training would be provided for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
skills<br />
6. Vulnerable EPs would be provided one-time<br />
Economic Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
productive assets<br />
1F<br />
Private<br />
Property<br />
Agricultur<br />
e land<br />
and other<br />
assets<br />
Unclear title<br />
/disputed<br />
titles<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> land / structure:<br />
Compensation at replacement value for land /<br />
structure.<br />
R&R assistance<br />
1. Will be treated at par with titleholders. However<br />
for disputed cases assistances would be<br />
released only after the case is settled either<br />
through court or by consensus<br />
2 Others<br />
2A Livelihood Wage<br />
earners<br />
Individual<br />
Lump sum<br />
Impact Category: Loss <strong>of</strong> income due to acquisition<br />
<strong>of</strong> agriculture land where the person was working<br />
as agriculture labour or sharecropper, etc or due to<br />
acquisition <strong>of</strong> commercial establishment where the<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 44
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
person was engaged as working hand.<br />
1. They will be paid a lump sum transitional<br />
allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if associated for past<br />
three years continuously<br />
2. Training would be provided for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
skills<br />
3. Vulnerable EPs would be provided one-time<br />
Economic Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
productive assets<br />
2B<br />
Nonperennial<br />
corps<br />
Family<br />
Notice to harvest standing crops<br />
1. They will be given a notice 4 months in<br />
advance.<br />
2. Grant towards crop lost before harvest due to<br />
forced relocation, equal to market value <strong>of</strong><br />
crop lost plus cost <strong>of</strong> replacement <strong>of</strong> seeds for<br />
the next season’s harvest.<br />
2C<br />
Perennial<br />
crops such<br />
as fruit<br />
trees<br />
Family<br />
Compensation at “replacement value”<br />
Compensation for perennial crops and trees,<br />
calculated as annual produce value multiplied by<br />
remaining life <strong>of</strong> the tree.<br />
3 Illegal Use <strong>of</strong> the ROW<br />
3A Illegal use <strong>of</strong><br />
the ROW<br />
Encroach<br />
ers<br />
Family Will receive no compensation for land but<br />
assistance for assets to the vulnerable<br />
1. Encroachers will be notified in time in which to<br />
remove their assets (except trees) and harvest<br />
their crops.<br />
2. Compensation for structures at replacement<br />
cost to the vulnerable person.<br />
3. Training would be provided for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
skills to the EPs loosing commercial activities<br />
4. Vulnerable EPs loosing commercial activities<br />
would be provided one-time Economic<br />
Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong> productive<br />
assets<br />
5. Right to salvage materials from the demolished<br />
structure.<br />
3B Squatters Family Will receive no compensation for land but<br />
assistance for assets.<br />
1. Compensation for loss <strong>of</strong> structure at<br />
replacement cost.<br />
2. A lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if<br />
within the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000<br />
if outside the affected village or municipality or<br />
new destination is more than 2 Km.<br />
3. Training would be provided for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
skills to the EPs loosing commercial activities<br />
4. Vulnerable EPs loosing commercial activities<br />
would be provided one-time economic<br />
Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong> productive<br />
assets<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 45
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
S.No Category Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Loss<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Entitlement<br />
Entitlement and <strong>Description</strong><br />
5. Right to salvage materials from the demolished<br />
structure.<br />
3C<br />
Shifting<br />
Business<br />
Ambulator<br />
y vendors<br />
(Kiosks)<br />
Family They are not eligible for compensation or<br />
“assistance”<br />
Ambulatory vendors licensed for fixed locations will<br />
be considered as kiosks.<br />
They will receive lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />
300.<br />
4. Community<br />
infrastructur<br />
e, cohesion<br />
and<br />
amenities<br />
Common<br />
property<br />
resources<br />
Community Conservation, protection, compensatory<br />
replacement<br />
1. Easily replaced resources, such as cultural<br />
properties will be conserved (by means <strong>of</strong><br />
special protection, relocation, replacement,<br />
etc.) in consultation with the community.<br />
2. Loss <strong>of</strong> access to firewood, etc. will be<br />
compensated by involving the communities<br />
in a social forestry scheme, in co-ordination<br />
with the Department <strong>of</strong> Forests, wherever<br />
possible.<br />
3. Adequate safety measures, particularly for<br />
pedestrians and children (for details refer to<br />
safety planning section in <strong>Project</strong>’s Design<br />
Document);<br />
4. Landscaping <strong>of</strong> community common areas;<br />
improved drainage; roadside rest areas,<br />
etc. are all provided in the design <strong>of</strong> the<br />
highways.<br />
5. Employment opportunities in the project during<br />
construction phase for able- bodied<br />
individuals, if possible.<br />
6. Loss <strong>of</strong> trees will be replaced by compensatory<br />
afforestation (for details refer to EMP).<br />
4A<br />
Any other impact not yet<br />
identified, whether loss <strong>of</strong><br />
asset or livelihood<br />
Unforeseen impacts will be documented and<br />
mitigated based on the principles agreed upon in<br />
this policy framework. For e.g., loss <strong>of</strong> access to<br />
agriculture field during construction stage.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 46
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 47
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
3.5. Land Acquisition Process<br />
The process <strong>of</strong> Land acquisition to be adopted under this project is given below:<br />
• Land needed for the project shall be acquired by direct negotiation as per<br />
procedure laid down by the government. However, record <strong>of</strong> all those cases<br />
where negotiations have failed and reasons for failure <strong>of</strong> negotiations shall be<br />
maintained for future reference<br />
• The Emergency Clause <strong>of</strong> the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 shall not be invoked for<br />
land acquisition<br />
• A time period <strong>of</strong> 45 days would be available for carrying out negotiations with<br />
the landowners<br />
• The negotiations shall begin by <strong>of</strong>fering a minimum <strong>of</strong> 1.5 times <strong>of</strong> the registered<br />
value or stamp duty value/circle rate (whichever is higher) in order to make the<br />
propositions financially lucrative to the landowners (sellers). If the registered<br />
value/stamp duty or circle rates are more than a year old at time <strong>of</strong><br />
negotiations, 10% per annum will be added to bring the rates to currents levels.<br />
Those PAFs losing land shall be eligible for additional assistance equivalent to<br />
registration cost <strong>of</strong> land lost and expenditure incurred on paper work as if PAF<br />
intends to buy land.<br />
• A maximum <strong>of</strong> 3 rounds <strong>of</strong> negotiations may be conducted with the landowners<br />
• After every round <strong>of</strong> negotiation, record would be sent to the Head Office for<br />
information<br />
• The negotiations shall be conducted village-wise involving groups in order to<br />
maintain transparency<br />
• A prototype land category/type shall be decided and accordingly land price<br />
shall be fixed on the basis <strong>of</strong> three valuation method mentioned in the policy.<br />
The replacement value <strong>of</strong> land will be calculated by the following three<br />
methods and the highest value <strong>of</strong> the three shall be considered:<br />
• Taking into account such prescribed rates or the average <strong>of</strong> the<br />
actual transaction rates <strong>of</strong> similar lands for contemporary years for which<br />
sale deeds are registered.<br />
• Taking into consideration 20 times <strong>of</strong> the annual value <strong>of</strong> gross<br />
production <strong>of</strong> the concerned land, averaged over preceding five years.<br />
For this purpose, authentic secondary data from the district statistical<br />
Handbook, the data from the local agricultural produce samities, and<br />
agricultural department should be used.<br />
• Fixing up market value <strong>of</strong> land equal to the minimum land value if<br />
so prescribed by the State <strong>Government</strong> under Indian Stamp Act for the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> registration <strong>of</strong> sale deeds under Indian Registration Act <strong>of</strong><br />
1908.<br />
By paying the highest <strong>of</strong> the three methods, the replacement cost for the lost land<br />
shall be arrived.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 48
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• The NGO shall do the field work by using the above three methods to arrive at<br />
the replacement cost for the various categories <strong>of</strong> land and the same shall be<br />
forwarded to district land fixation committee for fixing the price.<br />
• Upon receiving the land price from DLFC, the HPRIDC will start negotiating with<br />
the PAP. The entire process is presented in a flow chart below.<br />
• After the negotiation has been reached with the land owners successfully, the<br />
same shall be declared in front <strong>of</strong> group and the compensation shall be paid to<br />
the land owner/s.<br />
• If land acquisition by negotiation is finalized, the entire negotiated amount will<br />
be paid in a single installment within three months <strong>of</strong> negotiations. Interest @ 12%<br />
will be paid for any delay in the payment <strong>of</strong> compensation<br />
• Entitled person has an option to surrender residual plot to project authority and<br />
be compensated as per provisions <strong>of</strong> the policy<br />
• All land measurements shall be based on the latest revenue map <strong>of</strong> the<br />
concerned village<br />
Flow Chart – Depicting the process <strong>of</strong> negotiation for lad acquisition<br />
DLFC- Review<br />
and Check the<br />
NGO figure & fix<br />
the price<br />
NGO- to arrive at<br />
replacement value on the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> three methods<br />
HPRIDC – Negotiate with PAP on<br />
the price given by DLFC<br />
Negotiation<br />
successful<br />
PAP<br />
Negotiation<br />
failed<br />
Compensation<br />
Paid<br />
Normal land<br />
acquisition<br />
process starts<br />
Possession <strong>of</strong><br />
land<br />
3.5.1. STEPS TO BE FOLLOWED FOR PRIVATE NEGOTIATIONS<br />
The following steps will be followed for Private Negotiations in respect <strong>of</strong> land<br />
acquisition for the project:<br />
• The negotiations shall be conducted by the <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the Department<br />
concerned.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 49
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• Even where land is proposed to be acquired by negotiations, it is desirable that<br />
preliminary notification u/s 4 is issued so that in the event <strong>of</strong> failure <strong>of</strong><br />
negotiations the land can be acquired under the LA Act without further delay.<br />
• The Deputy Commissioners shall render to <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the Department concerned<br />
conducting private negotiations.<br />
3.5.2. DISTRICT LAND PRICE FIXATION COMMITTEE (DLPFC)<br />
The DLPFC was set up as a Standing Committee to determine market prices for land at<br />
the District-level, which includes the following members:<br />
1. Deputy Commission (Chairman)<br />
2. Sub Divisional Magistrate<br />
3. Tehsildars<br />
4. District Revenue Officer<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 50
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 4 - PROJECT IMPACT AND LAND ACQUISITION IMPACT<br />
4.1. Census and Socio-Economic Survey Analysis<br />
Successful implementation <strong>of</strong> Rehabilitation Action Plan (RAP) depends on appropriate<br />
and accurate census and socio-economic survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>Project</strong> Affected Persons (PAPs)<br />
without which, there can be no measurement <strong>of</strong> precise impacts on the affected<br />
persons and therefore it becomes difficult to frame appropriate entitlement policies.<br />
Also in the absence <strong>of</strong> surveys it is difficult to measure the achievement or nonachievements<br />
<strong>of</strong> the basic objective <strong>of</strong> the RAP. Two kinds <strong>of</strong> surveys were taken up in<br />
course <strong>of</strong> the study:<br />
(1) Census verification survey<br />
(2) Socio-economic survey<br />
4.2. Objectives <strong>of</strong> the Census and Socio-economic Surveys<br />
The primary objectives <strong>of</strong> the Census and Socio-Economic Survey have been:<br />
• To collect information regarding likely project impacts in order to facilitate<br />
designs various components <strong>of</strong> RAP<br />
• To set up a cut <strong>of</strong>f date so as to monitor the influx <strong>of</strong> new people<br />
• To desegregate the properties by type and identification <strong>of</strong> possible categories<br />
entitlement<br />
• To attach actual values to key indicators <strong>of</strong> the PAPs social and economic status<br />
and their vulnerability to socio-economic change due to the project<br />
• To assess se/dependence on common property resource<br />
• To provide a benchmark for any further information needed to monitor and<br />
evaluate EPs in the future; and<br />
• To provide further inputs in preparation <strong>of</strong> RAP<br />
People who are not surveyed during the census have not been considered as PAP, as.<br />
The date on which the census survey was carried out will act as a cut <strong>of</strong>f date (table<br />
4.1). The cut <strong>of</strong>f date will be used to establish whether a person located in the corridor<br />
qualifies as a PAP during the implementation <strong>of</strong> the various phases <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
However, a person not enumerated during the census, but able to prove their stay in<br />
the project corridor during the census survey has been considered for entitlement.<br />
Table: 4.1: Corridor wise dates <strong>of</strong> Census Survey<br />
Corridor name Start date End Date<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 06-08-2006 26-08-2006<br />
Una – Nerchowk 10-10-2006 07-11-2006<br />
Theog - Rohru 09-11-2006 14-11-2006<br />
4.3. Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Survey<br />
A detailed socio-economic survey was conducted in conjunction with the census <strong>of</strong><br />
the project-affected persons (PAPs) to pr<strong>of</strong>ile the impacted project area and provide a<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 51
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
baseline against which mitigation measures and support will be measured. For this<br />
purpose, comprehensive information related to people's assets, Income, socio-cultural<br />
and graphic indicators, religious structures, and other sources <strong>of</strong> support such as<br />
comical property resources were collected. The analysis has covered the needs and<br />
resources <strong>of</strong> different groups and Individuals, including intra-household analysis and<br />
gender analysis. The analysis is based on the cut <strong>of</strong>f date for entitlement assigned in the<br />
project (the cut <strong>of</strong>f date for the non title holder is the start date <strong>of</strong> census and for title<br />
holders it is the date <strong>of</strong> legal notification under section 4(1) <strong>of</strong> LA Act 1894). There were<br />
some families absent from their place <strong>of</strong> stay and they could not be covered under the<br />
survey but while enumerating these families have been included. In addition to this,<br />
some families did not response to some questions especially questions related to<br />
income. Therefore, this analysis is based on the responses from PAPs. Data in table 4.2<br />
reveals the families affected in priority I and II <strong>of</strong> HPSRP due to proposed road upgradation<br />
work, <strong>of</strong> which 688 numbers will be displaced either because <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong><br />
residential or commercial structures. The data presented in the table for priority II is the<br />
approximate figure <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> families getting affected. Henceforth, the report deals<br />
with the details regarding priority I road only.<br />
Table 4.2: Distribution <strong>of</strong> Affected Families<br />
Affected Families<br />
PAPs<br />
Priority & Corridor name<br />
Displaced<br />
R C R+C O A Total T M F Families<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 33 127 22 23 302 507 2698 1430 1268 127<br />
I<br />
Una – Nerchowk 97 235 84 50 2556 3022 11725 6263 5461 245<br />
Theog - Rohru 22 62 15 13 705 817 2473 1277 1196 55<br />
Sub-Total 152 424 121 86 3563 4346 16896 8970 7925 427<br />
II<br />
Ghumarwin-Sarkaghat 60 110 40 20 437<br />
667 2668 1414 1254 66<br />
Kumarhatti- Nahan 20 42 12 10 152<br />
236 944 500 444 16<br />
Draman - Sihunta 27 28 20 16 132<br />
223 892 473 419 17<br />
Ranital - kotla 15 32 7 11 258<br />
323 1292 685 607 27<br />
Bhawarna -Jaisinghpur 57 134 52 22 533<br />
798 3192 1692 1500 135<br />
Sub-Total 179 346 131 79 1512 2247 8988 4764 4224 261<br />
Total 331 770 252 165 5075 6593 25884 13734 12141 688<br />
R-Residential, C-Commercial, R+C-Residence cum commercial, O-Others, A-Agriculture, PAP-<strong>Project</strong> Affected Persons,<br />
T-Total, M-Mal, F-Female<br />
4.3.1. ANALYSIS OF CENSUS AND BASELINE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA<br />
4.3.1.1. Sex Ratio<br />
During the census survey, gender <strong>of</strong> every individual was recorded as it helps in finding<br />
the gender ratio among the PAPs which is also an indicator for human development<br />
index. Same way gender data will help in finding the education, economic<br />
independence <strong>of</strong> the women in the family. The table 4.3 shows over half (53.09%) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
PAPs are male. In all the three roads, the sex ratio favours the male population. Among<br />
the total affected persons, it is observed that there are 884 females against 1000 male.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 52
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Table 4.3: Gender ratio among PAPs<br />
Corridor name <strong>Project</strong> Affected Gender<br />
Persons Male Female<br />
Sex ratio<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 2698 1430 1268 887<br />
Una – Nerchowk 11725 6263 5461 872<br />
Theog - Rohru 2473 1277 1196 937<br />
Total 16896 8968 7928 884<br />
4.3.1.2. Religious Groups<br />
Data on religious groups were collected in order to identify religious belief among the<br />
PAFs. The table 4.4 shows only three religions are followed in the study area viz., Hindu,<br />
Sikh and Muslims. The number <strong>of</strong> PAFs following Sikh and Muslim religion are very<br />
negligible. About 95 percent <strong>of</strong> the affected families are Hindu and the rest one<br />
percent are either Sikh or Muslim. Another 3.70 percent households were not available<br />
during the survey.<br />
Table 4.4: Religious belief among the PAFs<br />
Corridor name<br />
Religion<br />
Hindu Muslim Sikh Not Available<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 472(93.17%) 5(0.98%) 12(2.44%) 17(3.41%)<br />
Una – Nerchowk 2925(96.78%) 19(0.64%) 0 78(2.58%)<br />
Theog - Rohru 722(88.39%) 29(3.57%) 0 66(8.04%)<br />
Total 4119(94.78%) 53(1.22%) 12(0.27%) 161(3.70%)<br />
4.3.1.3. Social Stratification<br />
In order to identify vulnerable groups, it is important to record the social group<br />
categories <strong>of</strong> the PAFs. The survey results show that, more than 64 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
affected families belong to the Higher Caste groups, 14 percent belongs to Scheduled<br />
Caste categories, 15 percent belongs to OBC and only six percent were not available<br />
during the survey. The important aspect is that there is not a single Tribal affected family<br />
found in the affected area impacted by the project (table 4.5).<br />
Table 4.5: Social stratification among PAFs<br />
Corridor name<br />
Social<br />
SC OBC General Not available<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 62(12.20%) 275(54.15%) 153(30.24%) 17(3.41%)<br />
Una – Nerchowk 480(15.88%) 357(11.80%) 2030(67.17%) 156(5.15%)<br />
Theog - Rohru 80(9.82%) 22(2.68%) 606(74.11%) 109(13.39%)<br />
Total 622(14.31%) 653(15.03%) (64.17%) 282(6.48%)<br />
4.3.1.4. Marital Status<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> data reveals that about 55.92 percent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Project</strong> Affected Persons<br />
covered under the survey are married and 39.70 percent are unmarried. The analysis<br />
further shows that about 4.30 percent <strong>of</strong> PAPs are in widow or widower category while<br />
the remaining negligible percent belongs to other categories i.e. divorced or<br />
separated (table 4.6).<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 53
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Table 4.6: Marital status <strong>of</strong> the PAPs<br />
Corridor name<br />
Marital status<br />
Married Unmarried<br />
Widow/<br />
widower<br />
Divorce/<br />
separated<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 1459(54.08%) 1095(40.60%) 144(5.32%) 0<br />
Una – Nerchowk 6706(57.19%) 4481(38.22%) 525(4.48%) 13(0.11%)<br />
Theog - Rohru 1284(51.92%) 1131(45.72%) 58(2.36%) 0<br />
Total 9449(55.92%) 6707(39.70%) 727(4.30%) 13(0.08%)<br />
4.3.1.5. Distribution <strong>of</strong> PAPs by Age Group Classification<br />
The PAPs has been categorised in to six age groups. The distribution <strong>of</strong> PAPs age in<br />
various group shows, 28.97 percent <strong>of</strong> the total PAPs belongs to the 25-40, that is<br />
potentially productive group whereas 7.32 percent belongs to above 60 yeas age<br />
group and a further 23.26 percent belongs to the age group below 14 years, who are<br />
dependant population as per the definition <strong>of</strong> the Census <strong>of</strong> India. Another 21.03<br />
percent falls in 40-60 age bracket which is generally a gradual decline from the pick<br />
productive bracket to less productive or retirement bracket (table 4.7).<br />
Table 4.7: Age group <strong>of</strong> affected people<br />
Age group Mehatpur - Amb Una – Nerchowk Theog - Rohru Total<br />
60 years 168(6.23%) 1018(8.68%) 88(3.54%) 1237(7.32%)<br />
4.3.1.6. Literacy Level <strong>of</strong> PAPs<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> surveyed population about 18.68 percent have never attended any formal<br />
schooling. Even among the formally educated PAPs, majority have dropped out for<br />
some or the other reason. The analysis indicates that there are about 15.60 percent<br />
affected people who are educated up to primary class level, another 17.02<br />
percentage are educated up to middle class level and 25.76 percent have studied up<br />
to High School level. Other than this, 7.75 percent <strong>of</strong> the Affected People have done<br />
their graduation and 2.81 percent <strong>of</strong> affected persons have studied beyond<br />
Graduation level (table 4.8). The education level among PAPs is higher than the state<br />
average and this could be attributed to the fact that all these families are living close<br />
to SH and has better connectivity than the other parts <strong>of</strong> the state.<br />
Table 4.8: Literacy level <strong>of</strong> PAPs<br />
Literacy level Mehatpur - Amb Una – Nerchowk Theog - Rohru Total<br />
Illiterate 534(19.80%) 2049(17.48%) 533(21.53%) 3157(18.68%)<br />
Primary 475(17.60%) 1686(14.38%) 387(15.63%) 2635(15.60%)<br />
Middle 517(19.16%) 1913(16.32%) 343(13.86%) 2875(17.02%)<br />
High school 633(23.46%) 3197(27.27%) 620(25.07%) 4352(25.76%)<br />
Pre-university 309(11.46%) 1550(13.22%) 263(10.62%) 2087(12.35%)<br />
Graduate 168(6.23%) 914(7.80%) 306(12.39%) 1310(7.75%)<br />
Post-graduate 62(2.29%) 409(3.48%) 22(0.88%) 475(2.81%)<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 54
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Literacy level Mehatpur - Amb Una – Nerchowk Theog - Rohru Total<br />
Others (0.00%) 6(0.06%) (0.00%) 5(0.03%)<br />
4.3.1.7. Occupational Pattern<br />
Occupational pattern <strong>of</strong> the PAP is recorded to assess their skill so that income<br />
generation plan can be prepared accordingly for alternative income generating<br />
scheme. Secondly, occupational pattern helps in identifying dominating economic<br />
activity in the area. The employment rate among the PAPs stands at 30 percent. The<br />
survey results in table 4.9 shows nearly 15 percentage <strong>of</strong> PAPs engaged in trade and<br />
business and it is mainly found among the PAPs settled along the road. This stands true<br />
for any state or national highway. Besides this, about 3.30 percent <strong>of</strong> the affected<br />
persons depend upon agriculture for their livelihood and another 2.87 percent are<br />
labourers whereas 6.02 percentages <strong>of</strong> PAPs are in service. In other category under<br />
occupation patters, majority are pensioners.<br />
Table 4.9: Occupation Pattern <strong>of</strong> PAPs<br />
Occupation Mehatpur - Una – Theog - Total<br />
Amb Nerchowk Rohru<br />
Unemployed 1842(68.29%) 8469(72.23%) 1897(76.70%) 12059(71.37%)<br />
Cultivator 138(5.13%) 253(2.16%) 88(3.54%) 558(3.30%)<br />
Agri. Labour 116(4.31%) 279(2.38%) 22(0.88%) 485(2.87%)<br />
Business 425(15.77%) 1634(13.94%) 423(17.11%) 2515(14.89%)<br />
Service 143(5.32%) 850(7.25%) 44(1.77%) 1018(6.02%)<br />
Other 32(1.19%) 240(2.05%) 0.00% 261(1.54%)<br />
4.3.1.8. Average Annual HH Income<br />
Annual Income helps in assessing families below poverty line. During the survey,<br />
incomes <strong>of</strong> a household through all possible sources were recorded. The annual<br />
household income is substantially high and thus majority <strong>of</strong> the affected households<br />
belong to the above poverty line category and economically well up. Merely five<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> the households reported less than Rs. 25000/- annual income. About 17.62<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> household’s annual income is between Rs. 25000 to 50000, 24.39 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
household’s income is between Rs. 50000 to 100000. Household’s earning more than Rs.<br />
100000 annually constitutes about 24.27 percent. There are good numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
households (28.22 percent) who were either not available or preferred not answer or<br />
strongly resented to questions related to income. This is due to the fear that the<br />
information collected may be used against them by government. However, these<br />
households are economically well up (table 4.10).<br />
Table 4.10: Household Income<br />
HH income in Mehatpur -<br />
Rs.<br />
Amb<br />
Una – Nerchowk Theog - Rohru Total<br />
< 25000/- 132(4.88%) 604(5.15%) 199(8.04%) 928(5.49%)<br />
25001- 35000/- 79(2.93%) 403(3.43%) 66(2.68%) 539(3.19%)<br />
35001- 50000/- 474(17.56%) 1434(12.23%) 442(17.86%) 2438(14.43%)<br />
50001-75000/- 500(18.54%) 1837(15.67%) 397(16.07%) 2784(16.48%)<br />
75001-100000/- 237(8.78%) 956(8.15%) 132(5.36%) 1338(7.92%)<br />
100001-150000/- 303(11.22%) 1409(12.02%) 155(6.25%) 1856(10.98%)<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 55
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
HH income in Mehatpur -<br />
Rs.<br />
Amb<br />
Una – Nerchowk Theog - Rohru Total<br />
> 150001/- 500(18.54%) 1484(12.66%) 155(6.25%) 2244(13.28%)<br />
Not responded or<br />
locked<br />
474(17.56%) 3598(30.69%) 927(37.50%) 4769(28.22%)<br />
4.3.1.9. Vulnerable Families<br />
As regards vulnerability among the affected families 25.70 percent fall in this category.<br />
The vulnerability <strong>of</strong> families is in category <strong>of</strong> scheduled caste, below poverty Line,<br />
women headed household and disability. Of the total vulnerable families, 55.68<br />
percent belongs to scheduled caste, 39.65 percent belong to BPL, 1.07 percent<br />
belongs to WHH and the remaining 3.58 percent belong to disable category. In case <strong>of</strong><br />
disable one or more members <strong>of</strong> the family has some or other form <strong>of</strong> physical<br />
disability. The proportion <strong>of</strong> vulnerable families in each corridor with respect to total<br />
affected families in the corridor reveals that 31.16 percent in Mehatpur - Amb, 25.45<br />
percent in Una - Nerchowk and 23.26 percent in Theog - Rohru (table 4.11).<br />
Table 4.11: Vulnerability among affected families<br />
Corridor name SC % BPL % WHH % Disable % Total %<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 62 39.24 67 42.41 3 1.90 26 16.46 158 31.16<br />
Una – Nerchowk 480 62.42 273 35.5 5 0.65 11 1.43 769 25.45<br />
Theog - Rohru 80 42.11 103 54.21 4 2.11 3 1.58 190 23.26<br />
Total 622 55.68 443 39.65 12 1.07 40 3.58 1117 25.70<br />
The number <strong>of</strong> vulnerable affected persons for each category <strong>of</strong> vulnerability is given in<br />
table 4.12. The total number <strong>of</strong> vulnerable person affected are 4312, it is approximately<br />
25.52 percent <strong>of</strong> the total affected population. The SC population constitutes 58.32<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> the total vulnerable population followed by BPL with 39.91 percent. The<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> WHH and disable constitutes one percent each respectively.<br />
Table 4.12: Total vulnerable population among PAPs<br />
Corridor name<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Affected Persons<br />
SC % BPL % WHH % Disable % Total<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 339 46.44 355 48.63 10 1.37 26 3.56 730<br />
Una – Nerchowk 1913 63.96 1054 35.24 13 0.43 11 0.37 2991<br />
Theog - Rohru 263 44.50 312 52.79 13 2.20 3 0.51 591<br />
Total<br />
2515 1721 36 40<br />
4312<br />
The gender break-up among the vulnerable population is given in table 4.13. The<br />
women constitute 44.73 percentages <strong>of</strong> all affected vulnerable persons.<br />
Corridor name<br />
Table 4.13: Gender among Vulnerable Persons<br />
SC BPL WHH Disable<br />
Male Femal Male Female Male Female Male Female<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 56
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Mehatpur % 54.17% 45.83% 56.72% 43.28% 30.00% 70.00% 100.00% 0.00%<br />
- Amb No. 184 155 201 154 3 7 26<br />
Una – % 52.96% 47.04% 54.19% 45.81% 38.46% 61.54% 90.91% 9.09%<br />
Nerchowk No. 1013 900 571 483 5 8 10 1<br />
Theog - % 52.38% 47.62% 53.06% 46.94% 38.46% 61.54% 100.00% 0.00%<br />
Rohru No. 138 125 166 146 5 8 3<br />
Total % 53.08% 46.92% 54.50% 45.50% 36.11% 63.89% 97.67% 2.33%<br />
No. 1335 1180 938 783 13 23 39 1<br />
4.3.1.10. Household Assets <strong>of</strong> PAHs<br />
The analysis in respect <strong>of</strong> the household asset structure reveals that television, cooking<br />
gas, telephone and refrigerator are owned by majority (table 4.14). The other<br />
prominent assets are tape recorder, radio, cycle and two wheelers. It can be observed<br />
that the number <strong>of</strong> cycle is almost negligible in Theog - Rohru corridor and at the same<br />
time the number is significant in Mehatpur - Amb road. Similarly, in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
refrigerator there is large variance in number <strong>of</strong> ownership among the corridor. This<br />
indicates that people’s asset ownership has a strong linkage with the natural<br />
environment.<br />
Table 4.14: Household Asset Structure<br />
HH Assets Mehatpur - Amb Una – Nerchowk Theog - Rohru Total<br />
Television 59.71% 50.43% 50.89% 53.00%<br />
Tape Recorder 19.42% 19.96% 10.71% 18.52%<br />
Radio 18.93% 16.74% 10.71% 16.48%<br />
Refrigerator 38.83% 27.47% 11.61% 28.22%<br />
Telephone 42.23% 30.04% 27.68% 32.95%<br />
Cycles 55.83% 10.09% 3.57% 21.20%<br />
Three Wheelers 0.49% 1.07% 0.89% 0.89%<br />
Two wheeler 31.55% 13.52% 1.79% 16.60%<br />
Tractor/Car/ Jeep 11.17% 2.58% 10.71% 6.00%<br />
Truck/Bus 0.97% 0.64% 4.46% 1.28%<br />
Cooking Gas 58.25% 38.63% 41.96% 44.32%<br />
4.4. Analysis <strong>of</strong> Impact on structure<br />
The project will impact 683 structures affecting 783 families altogether. Out <strong>of</strong> 783<br />
families impacted by way <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> structure, 427 families will be displaces. This includes<br />
all kind <strong>of</strong> usage <strong>of</strong> structure (table 4.15).<br />
Table 4.15: Details <strong>of</strong> Impacted Structures<br />
Corridor name Affected Structures Affected Families Displaced Families<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 176 205 127<br />
Una – Nerchowk 430 466 245<br />
Theog - Rohru 77 112 55<br />
Total 683 783 427<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 57
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Ownership status <strong>of</strong> the impacted structures is presented in table 4.16. The data reveals<br />
that <strong>of</strong> the total impacted structures, 49.42 percent are owners, 27.59 percent are<br />
tenant, merely 1.31 percent is squatters and 16.73 percent are encroachers. About 37<br />
such structures were found locked or abandoned during the survey and these are<br />
either fall in owner or tenant category. The socio-economic details <strong>of</strong> impacted families<br />
are presented in Annexure III.<br />
Table 4.16: Status <strong>of</strong> the impacted families<br />
Corridor Owners Tenants Squatters Encroachers Not Available<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 111 60 10 17 7<br />
Una – Nerchowk 250 135 2 64 15<br />
Theog - Rohru 26 21 0 50 15<br />
Total 387 216 12 131 37<br />
The analysis with respect to the distribution <strong>of</strong> PAFs and PDFs on the basis <strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong><br />
loss sustained by them shows that, a total number <strong>of</strong> 783 families have been affected<br />
out <strong>of</strong> which 427 families are coming under displaced categories. Similarly, when the<br />
data is further segregated, it is seen that among the displaced category, about 251 are<br />
losing commercial structures, 97 are losing residential structures and 79 are losing<br />
residential cum commercial structures (table 4.17).<br />
Table 4.17: Distribution <strong>of</strong> PAFs and PDFs by Type <strong>of</strong> Loss<br />
Corridor name<br />
Affected Families<br />
Displaced Families<br />
R C R+C others R C R+C others<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 33 127 22 23 25 90 12 -<br />
Una – Nerchowk 97 235 84 50 57 135 53 -<br />
Theog - Rohru 22 62 15 13 15 26 14 -<br />
Total 152 424 121 86 97 251 79 -<br />
R-Residence, C-Commercial, R+C-Residence cum commercial, O - Other Structures (Cow Shed/<br />
Boundary Wall/ Foundation/ Abandoned Structure/ Stores)<br />
The total number <strong>of</strong> structures impacted in three corridors is 683. Out <strong>of</strong> this, 82 are such<br />
structures which include cow shed, boundary wall, foundation, abandoned structures,<br />
stores and kiosks. Of the remaining 601 structures, 144 are residential, 344 are<br />
commercial and rest 113 are residential cum commercial. Among the residential<br />
structures, 52.08 percent are permanent, 36.81 percent are semi pucca and the rest<br />
11.11 percent are kuccha. In case <strong>of</strong> commercial 75.29 percent are pucca structure,<br />
9.59 percent are semi pucca and the remaining 15.11 percent are kuccha structure.<br />
Similarly, for residential cum commercial 84.95 percent are pucca structure, 11.50<br />
percent are semi pucca structure and 3.54 percent are kuccha structures. The<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> pucca structure to total combined structure <strong>of</strong> residential, commercial<br />
and residential cum commercial is staggering 71.55 percent and semi pucca<br />
constitutes another 16.47 percent. The high proportion <strong>of</strong> permanent structure reflects<br />
the good economic condition <strong>of</strong> the most <strong>of</strong> the households (table 4.18).<br />
Corridor name<br />
Table 4.18: Type <strong>of</strong> structure<br />
Residential Commercial Resi. cum commercial Others<br />
P SP K P SP K P SP K P SP K<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 58
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Corridor name<br />
Residential Commercial Resi. cum commercial Others<br />
P SP K P SP K P SP K P SP K<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 9 19 5 65 8 30 19 7 7 7<br />
Una – Nerchowk 55 30 8 180 20 10 72 6 1 19 19 10<br />
Theog - Rohru 11 4 3 14 5 12 5 7 3 1 2 10<br />
Total 75 53 16 259 33 52 96 13 4 27 28 27<br />
P- Pucca, SP- Semi Pucca, K- Kuccha, O - Other Structures (Cow Shed/ Boundary Wall/ Foundation/ Abandoned<br />
Structure/ Stores and mobile vendor)<br />
As regards magnitude <strong>of</strong> impact on the residential structures, 12.5 percent are losing<br />
less than 10 percent, 20.14 percent are losing between 10-20 percent, 11.80 percent<br />
are losing between 21-30 percent, 11.80 percent are losing 31-40 percent, 6.25 percent<br />
are losing 41-50 percent, 9.72 percent are losing 51-75 percent and remaining 27.78<br />
percent are losing above 75 percent <strong>of</strong> their structure. Of the total affected structures<br />
62.5 percent are losing less than 50 percent (table 4.19).<br />
Table 4.19: Magnitude <strong>of</strong> impact on residential structures<br />
Corridor name<br />
Residential<br />
75%<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 4 4 4 3 2 3 13<br />
Una – Nerchowk 13 23 12 13 6 7 19<br />
Theog - Rohru 1 2 1 1 1 4 8<br />
Total 18 29 17 17 9 14 40<br />
The magnitude <strong>of</strong> project impact on the commercial structures is given in table 4.20.<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> data reveals 9.88 percent are losing less than 10 percent, 17.15 percent<br />
are losing between 10-20 percent, 8.43 percent are losing between 21-30 percent, 8.43<br />
percent are losing 31-40 percent, 6.68 percent are losing 41-50 percent, 7.84 percent<br />
are losing 51-75 percent and the rest 41.57 percent are losing above 75 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
their structure. The magnitude <strong>of</strong> impact on commercial structures is more since such<br />
structures are very close to the road or abutting the shoulder <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />
Table 4.20: Magnitude <strong>of</strong> impact on commercial structures<br />
Corridor name<br />
Commercial<br />
75%<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 2 11 9 14 10 13 44<br />
Una – Nerchowk 31 44 17 14 12 14 78<br />
Theog - Rohru 1 4 3 1 1 0 21<br />
Total 34 59 29 29 23 27 143<br />
In table 4.21 the impact on residential cum commercial reveals that 8.85 percent are<br />
losing less than 10 percent, 21.24 percent are losing between 10-20 percent, 16.81<br />
percent are losing between 21-30 percent, 12.39 percent are losing 31-40 percent, 6.19<br />
percent are losing 41-50 percent, 6.19 percent are losing 51-75 percent and the rest<br />
28.32 percent are losing above 75 percent <strong>of</strong> their structure.<br />
Table 4.21: Magnitude <strong>of</strong> impact on residential cum commercial<br />
structures<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 59
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Corridor name<br />
Residential cum Commercial<br />
75%<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 3 4 2 3 2 0 5<br />
Una – Nerchowk 6 20 13 10 5 4 21<br />
Theog - Rohru 1 0 4 1 0 3 6<br />
Total 10 24 19 14 7 7 32<br />
In addition to the impacted families, there are 141 employees working in these business<br />
establishments who will get affected as well with their employer. The maximum<br />
numbers <strong>of</strong> employees i.e. 60 persons are earning in the range <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2001-3000<br />
followed by 54 persons are in the range <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000-2000 (table 4.22).<br />
Table 4.22: Loss <strong>of</strong> employment due to impact on commercial<br />
establishments<br />
Corridor name<br />
Employees Details<br />
No <strong>of</strong> Commercial<br />
Structure<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
Employees<br />
4000<br />
75%<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 2 2 0 3 0 1 13<br />
Una – Nerchowk 6 13 2 1 8 4 14<br />
Theog - Rohru 0 0 0 0 0 3 10<br />
Total 8 15 2 4 8 8 37<br />
4.5. Need for Data Up-date<br />
Though the utmost care has been taken during the census and socio-economic survey<br />
to cover all the affected families, there is always certain percentage margin <strong>of</strong> error<br />
with respect to ownership, area measured etc. It may also happen that person<br />
interviewed is not the only owner as stated by him but there are multiple owners to the<br />
property. In addition to this, some structures were closed or abandoned during the<br />
survey which needs to be updated for distribution <strong>of</strong> compensation or assistance.<br />
Therefore, it is suggested that the data must be updated prior to distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
compensation and assistance.<br />
4.6. Land Acquisition Estimate<br />
The up-gradation and widening <strong>of</strong> 250 km length <strong>of</strong> Highways under the <strong>Project</strong><br />
(HPSRP) is expected to have both positive and negative impacts on the environment<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 60
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
and on people <strong>of</strong> the project area. Despite all efforts taken for modifying the design <strong>of</strong><br />
the three project roads, a section <strong>of</strong> the communities along the corridor are going to<br />
be negatively impacted due to clearing <strong>of</strong> encroachment and squatters from the<br />
Public RoW and the proposed realignment sections. Negative impacts also include loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> economic opportunities/livelihood, sources <strong>of</strong> earning etc. In addition to the above,<br />
a small number <strong>of</strong> community/cultural properties are also going to be negatively<br />
impacted. To be precise, land is coming under acquisition for CoI along the existing<br />
road and for RoW along bypasses. A total area <strong>of</strong> 93.37 hectare land is coming under<br />
acquisition/transfer for the three roads out <strong>of</strong> which 17.56 hectares is for Mehatpur -<br />
Amb road, 52.77 hectare for Una - Nerchowk road and 23.05 hectares for Theog -<br />
Rohru road. Of the total land, 48.68 hectares are private land, 10.19 hectares are forest<br />
land and 34.52 hectares are government land. (Table 4.24)<br />
Table 4.24: Land Acquisition Details (Ha.)<br />
Corridor name Private land Forest land Govt. land Total Land<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 9.35 0.19 8.03 17.56<br />
Una – Nerchowk 29.11 3 20.66 52.77<br />
Theog - Rohru 10.22 7 5.83 23.05<br />
Total 48.68 10.19 34.52 93.38<br />
As regards the extent <strong>of</strong> land to be acquired for different purpose is taken in to<br />
account, it shows that the land will be acquired for junction improvement, bypasses, realignments,<br />
widening and other purposes. Out <strong>of</strong> the total land requirement 2.00 hect.<br />
is required for bypass, 1.16 hect. required for junction improvement, 25.33 hect. for<br />
realignment and the remaining 64.89 hect. for widening purposes (table 4.25).<br />
Table 4.25: Summary <strong>of</strong> Land to be acquired for various purposes<br />
Particulars Mehatpur - Amb Una – Nerchowk Theog - Rohru<br />
Junction Improvement 0.37 0.60 0.19<br />
Bypasses 0.00 2.00 0.00<br />
Re-alignments 11.19 13.044 1.094<br />
Widening 6.00 37.126 21.766<br />
Total 17.56 52.77 23.05<br />
The total number <strong>of</strong> families losing land to the project is about 3563. The average land<br />
loss per family in the project is about 0.013 hectare. This figure at the corridor level<br />
varies from 0.31 hectare in Mehatpr - Amb to 0.011 hectare in Una – Nerchowk (table<br />
4.26).<br />
Table 4.26: Families Impacted due to land acquisition<br />
Corridor name Families Impacted Average land loss per family in Ha.<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 302 0.031<br />
Una – Nerchowk 2556 0.011<br />
Theog - Rohru 705 0.014<br />
Total 3563 0.013<br />
The <strong>Project</strong> will have one bypass on Una - Nerchowk road (Bootha). The bypass<br />
alignment on Theog - Rohru road already exists and very little land acquisition is<br />
required to improve the geometry. The bypasses on Una - Nerchowk road will be <strong>of</strong><br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 61
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
1800 meter in long and a total <strong>of</strong> 2 hectares <strong>of</strong> land will be acquired. Due to the<br />
proposed bypass in all 332 Families will be affected by land acquisition (table 4.27).<br />
Table 4.27: Extent <strong>of</strong> Land Acquisition Estimates for Bypasses<br />
4.7. Type <strong>of</strong> Common Property Lost<br />
Particulars<br />
Una – Nerchowk<br />
Length in mt. 1800.000<br />
Total area required (ha.) 2<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> PAFs 332<br />
Besides house structure (commercial and residential) and agricultural land, different<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> common property will be affected due to the widening and upgrading <strong>of</strong> the<br />
roads. The analysis <strong>of</strong> table indicates that common property such as religious places,<br />
hand pumps, public tap, schools, bus stops, compound walls and a number <strong>of</strong> such<br />
other common properties will be affected and which has bearing on the user group.<br />
The table shows that a total number <strong>of</strong> 15 religious structures, 72 hand pumps, 1 school<br />
buildings, 40 bus stops, 6 compound walls, 22 government buildings, 1 co-operative<br />
society buildings and 18 religious platforms are falling within the corridor <strong>of</strong> impact.<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> the affected community properties are presented in Annexure IV.<br />
Table 4.28: Distribution <strong>of</strong> Community Properties by Affect Category<br />
Particulars Mehatpur - Amb Una – Nerchowk Theog - Rohru Total<br />
Religious place 3 9 2 15<br />
Hand Pumps 1 58 13 72<br />
Schools 0 1 0 1<br />
Bus Stops 18 16 6 40<br />
Compound wall 4 2 0 6<br />
<strong>Government</strong><br />
buildings<br />
8 10 4 22<br />
Co-operative<br />
building<br />
0 1 0 1<br />
Religious platform 0 18 0 18<br />
Well 4 7 0 11<br />
Water Tank 4 24 9 38<br />
Water tap 1 31 2 34<br />
Public toilet 0 2 0 2<br />
Pump house 2 0 0 2<br />
platform 3 0 0 3<br />
Others 0 1 0 1<br />
Total 48 180 36 266<br />
The total number <strong>of</strong> religious structures affected due to the widening and strengthening<br />
<strong>of</strong> 234 km <strong>of</strong> state highway are 15. Majority <strong>of</strong> these structures are small shrines and<br />
required to be shifted from safety point <strong>of</strong> view for both road users and devotes. The<br />
magnitude <strong>of</strong> impact on these properties is given below in table 4.29.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 62
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Table 4.29: Magnitude <strong>of</strong> impact on religious structure/shrine<br />
Corridor name<br />
Religious Places<br />
75%<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 1 0 0 1 1 0 1<br />
Una – Nerchowk 0 0 0 0 0 0 7<br />
Theog - Rohru 0 0 1 0 0 1 2<br />
Total 1 0 1 1 1 1 10<br />
Only one school is impacted by the project and need to be relocated from the present<br />
location. Discussion with school authority could not revel much since teachers at school<br />
level have no authority over it. The HPRIDC will take up the relocation issue with the<br />
department <strong>of</strong> education and the NGO will facilitate in it at field level.<br />
Table 4.30: Impact on Schools by percentage<br />
Corridor name<br />
Schools<br />
>75%<br />
Una – Nerchowk 1.00<br />
Total 1.00<br />
There are 22 government structures getting affected by the project. This range from<br />
check post to government building belongs to various departments. To relocate these<br />
structures HPRIDC will co-ordinate with respective departments. The percentage loss to<br />
each structure is given in table below.<br />
Table 4.31: Impact on <strong>Government</strong> building by percentage<br />
Corridor name<br />
<strong>Government</strong> Buildings<br />
75%<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 1 0 0 0 0 1 6<br />
Una – Nerchowk 0 1 1 0 0 3 5<br />
Theog - Rohru 0 0 0 0 0 2 2<br />
Total 1 1 1 0 0 6 13<br />
4.8 Opinion and Awareness about the <strong>Project</strong><br />
With the socio-economic survey some questions were asked to the PAPs regarding the<br />
awareness, source <strong>of</strong> awareness and opinion about the proposed development. The<br />
findings <strong>of</strong> the survey with regard to awareness, source <strong>of</strong> awareness and opinion is<br />
presented in table 4.32, 4.33 and 4.34 respectively.<br />
Table 4.32: Awareness about the project<br />
Corridor name<br />
Awareness in Percentage<br />
Yes No Not available<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 64.88 18.54 16.59<br />
Una – Nerchowk 60.52 7.73 31.76<br />
Theog - Rohru 50.89 10.71 38.39<br />
Total 58.76 12.33 28.91<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 63
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
It is interesting to note that for 53 percent <strong>of</strong> the affected population the source <strong>of</strong><br />
information is consultations and social survey held by the consultant. Local news paper<br />
is the next highest percentage source <strong>of</strong> information for the people.<br />
Table 4.33: Source <strong>of</strong> awareness about the project<br />
Corridor name<br />
Source <strong>of</strong> awareness<br />
TV Newspaper<br />
<strong>Government</strong><br />
Official<br />
Friends/<br />
Relative Others<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 3.76 28.57 13.53 19.55 34.59<br />
Una – Nerchowk 4.26 13.12 26.24 4.61 51.77<br />
Theog - Rohru 0.00 1.75 17.54 8.77 71.93<br />
Total 2.67 14.48 19.11 10.98 52.76<br />
Table 4.34: Opinion about the project<br />
Corridor name<br />
Opinion<br />
Good Bad Can not say<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 73.17 8.78 18.05<br />
Una – Nerchowk 36.27 30.47 33.26<br />
Theog - Rohru 41.07 18.75 40.18<br />
Total 50.17 19.33 30.50<br />
4.9. Resettlement Options<br />
To prepare an appropriate resettlement and rehabilitation plan addressing the need <strong>of</strong><br />
the people, questions related to resettlement options were asked to the affected<br />
families. The options were given to the affected families as per their ownership status<br />
and entitlement policy <strong>of</strong> HPRIDC. The options have been collected separately for<br />
owner resident, owner commercial, tenant residential and tenant commercial. Table<br />
4.35 reveals that among the owner residential majority have opted for replacement<br />
value <strong>of</strong> the structure and rehabilitation grant.<br />
Table 4.35: Resettlement option by owner resident<br />
Corridor<br />
Owner - Residence<br />
Replacement value<br />
&<br />
Rehabilitation grant<br />
Plot on cost basis,<br />
Replacement value<br />
& Rehabilitation grant<br />
Free Plot and<br />
Construction<br />
allowance (vulnerable)<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 50 2 1<br />
Una – Nerchowk 115 20 1<br />
Theog - Rohru 15 2 0<br />
Total 180 24 2<br />
As regard resettlement option among the commercial owners, more than 87 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the affected owner opted for replacement value and rehabilitation grant for the<br />
loss. Very few opted for plot on cost basis; this reflects that people are interested in<br />
managing their own life and livelihood (table 4.36).<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 64
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Table 4.36: Resettlement option by owner commercial<br />
Corridor<br />
Owner - Commercial<br />
Replacement value<br />
& Rehabilitation<br />
grant<br />
Plot on cost basis,<br />
Replacement value<br />
& Rehabilitation grant<br />
Free Plot and<br />
Construction allowance<br />
(Vulnerable + Land Less)<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 56 7 2<br />
Una – Nerchowk 89 15 0<br />
Theog - Rohru 10 2 0<br />
Total 155 24 2<br />
The choice <strong>of</strong> resettlement option among tenant residential and commercial reveals<br />
that 93 percent have opted for shifting, rental allowance along with training (table<br />
4.37). This shows that there is need for suitable training programme for the affected<br />
persons to enhance their quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
Table 4.37: Resettlement option by Tenant residential and tenant<br />
commercial<br />
Corridor<br />
Tenant - Residence<br />
Tenant Commercial<br />
Shifting Allowance<br />
and<br />
Shifting Allowance,<br />
rental allowance and<br />
Others<br />
(Specify)<br />
Rental Allowance<br />
training<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 2 53 0<br />
Una – Nerchowk 2 67 5 (Employment)<br />
Theog - Rohru 3 38 0<br />
Total 7 158 5<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 65
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 5 - IMPACT ON WOMEN AND OTHER VULNERABLE GROUPS<br />
5.1. Introduction<br />
India ranks 103 out <strong>of</strong> 137 countries in the gender development index (GDI) that reveals<br />
the reality <strong>of</strong> insufficient level <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> women as compared to men in this<br />
country. The economic condition <strong>of</strong> women headed households varies considerably<br />
depending upon factors such as marital status, social context <strong>of</strong> female leadership and<br />
decision making, access to facilities and productive resources, income and<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> the household. These conditions form the basis for defining indicators to<br />
assess the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> such households.<br />
There are two important aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong> where<br />
gender issues are required to be addressed. It is expected that in development<br />
projects, women are going to experience certain adverse socio-economic impacts<br />
such as eviction from public RoW, loss <strong>of</strong> common property resources, etc. This is to be<br />
noted here that post-project provisions as mentioned in the RAP has been done<br />
keeping in mind the well-being <strong>of</strong> mostly the affected women along with women <strong>of</strong><br />
the host communities. Thus, these relate to sustainable resettlement and rehabilitation,<br />
whereas, gender issues in the construction phase will mostly concern the women<br />
workers who will be engaged in the road construction activities. These women workers<br />
are expected to come from outside being engaged by the construction contractors<br />
and will be staying in the construction camps dung the period <strong>of</strong> construction. There<br />
may be participation from local women also in the construction activities.<br />
In resettlement and rehabilitation, women require special attention. Changes caused<br />
by relocation do not have equal implications for members <strong>of</strong> both sexes and may result<br />
in greater inconvenience to women. Due to disturbance in production systems,<br />
reduction in assets like land and livestock, women may have to face the challenge <strong>of</strong><br />
running a large household on limited income and resources. This in turn may force<br />
women as well as children to participate in work to supplement household income. In<br />
contrast to this, due to changes that are likely to take place for any development<br />
project, especially changes in environment and land labour ratio, those women who at<br />
present are engaged in activities like agricultural labour, or collection and sale <strong>of</strong> forest<br />
produce may find themselves unemployed and dependent. Therefore, additional<br />
efforts to maintain the social support network for women headed households as far as<br />
possible so that they remain closer to their locations and /or provide special services at<br />
the new sites.<br />
5.2. Women headed households<br />
While women constitute almost half <strong>of</strong> the affected and displaced population in the<br />
project area, they are neglected from the socio-economic development point <strong>of</strong> view.<br />
Socio economic parameters like illiteracy, work force participation rate, general health<br />
conditions etc. reveals that social status <strong>of</strong> women is very backward in the project area<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 66
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
and thereby brought forward the scope <strong>of</strong> considering the households headed by<br />
women as vulnerable. The analysis table on the basis <strong>of</strong> the empirical finding <strong>of</strong> the<br />
socio-economic survey reveals that a total number <strong>of</strong> 12 women Headed <strong>Project</strong><br />
Affected Families have been identified in the three project roads, the details <strong>of</strong> which<br />
are given below. Besides, a total number <strong>of</strong> 7928 female members have been<br />
enumerated including minors in the entire survey among the families affected by the<br />
project.<br />
Table 5.1: Number <strong>of</strong> Women Headed Households, Families and<br />
Members<br />
Corridor name No. <strong>of</strong> women headed<br />
households<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> family<br />
members<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 3 10<br />
Una – Nerchowk 5 13<br />
Theog - Rohru 4 13<br />
Total 12 36<br />
5.2.1. DEMOGRAPHIC AND OTHER KEY CHARACTERISTIC OF AFFECTED WOMEN<br />
Under demographic characteristics, data collected includes age group classification,<br />
Literacy, marital status, caste, and family type. The empirical data shows that the<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> affected women are in economically independent age group <strong>of</strong> 25 t0 40<br />
years (29.16 percent) and the second largest group is in 41-60 years age group (22.12<br />
percentages). Percentage <strong>of</strong> old women above 60 ears <strong>of</strong> age is about seven<br />
percent. Children below age <strong>of</strong> 14 years constitute 22.19 percent <strong>of</strong> the total affected<br />
women population (table 5.2).<br />
Table 5.2: Distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Project</strong> Affected Women in age group<br />
Age group Mehatpur - Amb Una – Theog - Rohru Total<br />
Nerchowk<br />
60 years 6.63% 84 8.19% 448 2.44% 29 7.04% 558<br />
5.2.2. LITERACY LEVEL AMONG AFFECTED WOMEN MEMBERS<br />
Illiteracy is 24 percent among the project affected women. Women with education<br />
level <strong>of</strong> primary and middle level constitute 35.14 percent; another 22 percent are<br />
educated up to high school level. Women with graduation and post graduation<br />
qualification are 6.72 and 2.57 percent respectively. Thus reflecting a good<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> women is educated (table 5.3).<br />
Table 5.3: Literacy Level among Affected Women members<br />
Literacy level Mehatpur - Una – Theog - Rohru Total<br />
Amb<br />
Nerchowk<br />
Illiterate 27.49% 349 22.33% 1219 21.34% 255 24.00% 1902<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 67
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Literacy level Mehatpur - Una – Theog - Rohru Total<br />
Amb<br />
Nerchowk<br />
Primary 19.49% 247 17.34% 947 18.29% 219 18.19% 1442<br />
Middle 17.35% 220 17.46% 953 12.80% 153 16.94% 1343<br />
High school 18.52% 235 23.04% 1258 25.61% 306 21.82% 1729<br />
Pre-university 9.16% 116 9.86% 538 12.20% 146 9.89% 784<br />
Graduate 5.46% 69 7.01% 383 9.15% 109 6.72% 533<br />
Post-graduate 2.53% 32 2.97% 162 0.61% 7 2.57% 204<br />
5.2.3. OCCUPATION PATTERN AMONG AFFECTED WOMEN MEMBERS<br />
As regards occupation patterns, as many as 95.87 percent <strong>of</strong> affected women are<br />
unemployed. Only one percent women are engaged in farming, another 1.96 percent<br />
is in business and about 1.16 percent is in service (table 5.4). This reflects the very low<br />
level <strong>of</strong> involvement <strong>of</strong> the women folk in the economic activities and there is enough<br />
scope for the involvement <strong>of</strong> women in the economic activity.<br />
Table 5.4: Occupation pattern among the project affected women<br />
Occupation<br />
Mehatpur - Amb Una – Nerchowk Theog - Rohru<br />
Total<br />
Unemployed 93.96% 297 96.32% 1340 96.34% 268 95.87% 1905<br />
Cultivator 1.95% 6 0.48% 7 0.00% 0 0.65% 13<br />
Agri. Labour 0.00% 0 0.12% 2 0.00% 0 0.1% 2<br />
Business 3.12% 10 1.43% 20 3.05% 9 1.96% 39<br />
Service 0.97% 3 1.31% 18 0.61% 2 1.16% 23<br />
Other 0.00% 0 0.36% 5 0.00% 0.25% 5<br />
Total 316 1392 279 1987<br />
5.2.4. VULNERABILITY AMONG AFFECTED WOMEN MEMBERS<br />
The vulnerability group in the entitlement policy includes SC, ST, WHH, BPL, Disable,<br />
Orphan and destitute. During the survey the categories <strong>of</strong> vulnerability found were<br />
Scheduled Castes, Women Headed Household, Below Poverty Line and disables. The<br />
vulnerable women constitute 25.06 percent <strong>of</strong> the total project affected women.<br />
Table 5.5: <strong>Project</strong> affected women in vulnerable category<br />
Corridor name SC BPL WHH Disable<br />
Femal Female Female Female<br />
Mehatpur - Amb % 13.14 19.66 30.44<br />
No. 155 154 7<br />
Una – Nerchowk % 76.27 61.69 34.78 100.00<br />
No. 900 483 8 1<br />
Theog - Rohru % 10.59 18.65 34.78<br />
No. 125 146 8<br />
Total<br />
% 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00<br />
No. 1180 783 23 1<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 68
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
5.3. Impact <strong>of</strong> Displacement on Woman<br />
Development induced displacement has lot <strong>of</strong> consequential impact and bring<br />
changes in the lives <strong>of</strong> PAPs. These changes are economic, social and cultural in<br />
nature. If the changes ore adverse, then certain vulnerable sections <strong>of</strong> the society like<br />
women, children, tribal, poor, etc. are worst hit. While social and cultural impacts are<br />
the results <strong>of</strong> the societies and communities within it due to relocation and resettlement<br />
arrangements, the economic effects are the outcome <strong>of</strong> the changes in the<br />
production system. Therefore it is imperative to study on those socio-cultural and<br />
economic aspects <strong>of</strong> such underprivileged sections <strong>of</strong> the society, among the affected<br />
community particularly in the light <strong>of</strong> their vulnerability to changed situation. It is the<br />
observation in projects associated with displacement that such vulnerable sections are<br />
generally not aware <strong>of</strong> their rights and privileges or even <strong>of</strong> their entitlements. As<br />
observed - in previous actions that, women forms substantial segment among the PAPs.<br />
It becomes necessary to segregate women and study the impact on their socioeconomic<br />
status. Since the entire analysis <strong>of</strong> socio-economic database has been done<br />
on social stratification basis (scheduled population) and presented in previous sections,<br />
this section exclusively deals with woman. In the process <strong>of</strong> R&R, women require special<br />
attention. Change caused by relocation does not have equal implications for<br />
members <strong>of</strong> both the sexes and may result in greater inconvenience to women. Due to<br />
disturbance in production system, reduction in assets like land and livestock, women<br />
may have to face the challenge <strong>of</strong> running a large household in limited income and<br />
resources. This in turn may force woman as well as children to participate in work for<br />
supplementing the household income. In contrast to this, due to changes that are likely<br />
to take places due to any development project, especially changes in environment<br />
and land labour ratio, those women who at present are engaged in activities like<br />
agriculture labour, or collection and sale <strong>of</strong> forest produce may find themselves<br />
unemployed and dependent. In this section an attempt has been made to study<br />
women's role in the economy <strong>of</strong> the household, their daily routine and social<br />
positioning in terms <strong>of</strong> their say in decision making at the household level. This exercise<br />
would be helpful in determining women's role in rehabilitation planning and women<br />
empowerment.<br />
5.4. Women's role in Household Economy<br />
The study revealed that women participation in economic activities is almost<br />
negligible. The percentage <strong>of</strong> workers among women is merely 4.38 percent. The<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> those who are gainfully employed are engaged in trade and business<br />
followed by service. As expected, most <strong>of</strong> the females are restricted to the household<br />
chores. As the study revealed, women are engaged in household work ranging from<br />
collecting potable water, cooking and child rearing to helping the male members<br />
either in running their petty shops or in agriculture field. Such low percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
working women may be because traditional values attached to the women's<br />
movement outside the four walls <strong>of</strong> the house, among the upper caste, is the main<br />
reason why less number <strong>of</strong> women are gainfully engaged.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 69
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
5.5. Time Disposition by women<br />
Majority <strong>of</strong> the women are in unemployed category as reflected in the occupation<br />
pattern table. However, it is not true in the sense that they have been engaged in<br />
household activities which has intangible value. If that labour put to monetary value, it<br />
may happen that that the time and effort put forth by women is more or equal to<br />
many <strong>of</strong> their male counterpart. Since such work is not considered as employment as<br />
per the census while deriving employment rate, they have been put in unemployment<br />
category. Most <strong>of</strong> the time these women spent in looking after children, household<br />
work, cooking, taking care domestic animals etc.<br />
5.6. Impact <strong>of</strong> developmental activities on Women<br />
Women as a vulnerable group has been addressed in the RAP but to give RAP a<br />
proper shape, this group should be considered with special emphasis as they constitute<br />
half <strong>of</strong> the society's population and they are found to be the worst affected in most <strong>of</strong><br />
the development projects in our country.<br />
Women are involved in the project anyway. However, most <strong>of</strong> the times, they are on<br />
the negatively impacted side. Following is the account <strong>of</strong> the ways women are<br />
affected and/or involved in the project:<br />
• Women constitute about half <strong>of</strong> the PAPs.<br />
• The RAP reveals that 12 women headed households are affected by the project.<br />
• Women face hardship and continue to suffer in silence during the transition<br />
period till the time the families are able to regain the previous living standard. The<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> this process is <strong>of</strong>ten lengthened due to delays in payment <strong>of</strong><br />
compensation, rehabilitation assistance and implementing the R&R, reconstructing the<br />
livelihood systems. Longer the transition period, more are the miseries.<br />
As per the R&R Policy as well as looking into the need <strong>of</strong> the day, women are required<br />
to be involved in the process <strong>of</strong> sustainable development. They have to be integrated<br />
in the project as full-fledged participants taking part in all the stages <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
starting from planning through Implementation and even in the post-project stages.<br />
Only then the process <strong>of</strong> development is going to help this section <strong>of</strong> vulnerable<br />
people.<br />
5.7. Participation <strong>of</strong> women in the <strong>Project</strong><br />
The Gender Development Index value for India is very low and the socio-economic<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the project area shows much lower socio-economic standing for women. It is<br />
imperative to bring the issue <strong>of</strong> women's development in the process <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic<br />
uplift within the scope <strong>of</strong> the RAP for HPSRP. For this, conscious effort should<br />
be made towards integrating the ongoing development and poverty alleviation<br />
Programme with the RAP.<br />
5.8. Women involvement in development process<br />
The development experience shows that it is equally necessary to consult women and<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer them choices in enabling them to make informed choices and decide for their<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 70
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
own development. Participation <strong>of</strong> women has been envisaged specifically in the<br />
following areas:<br />
• In the pre-planning and planning stages, participation from women could be<br />
sought through allowing them taking part in the consultation process. For this,<br />
the local level agencies <strong>of</strong> implementation i.e. the NGOs have an important role<br />
to play.<br />
• Field team <strong>of</strong> the NGO shall include at least-one women investigator/facilitator.<br />
• Compensation for land and assets lost being same for all the affected or<br />
displaced families, special care should be taken by the NGOs for women group<br />
while implementing the process <strong>of</strong> acquisition and compensation as well.<br />
• It is imperative that the PWD ensures that the women are consulted and invited<br />
to participate in group-based activities, to gain access and control over the<br />
resource as a part <strong>of</strong> the RAP Additionally.<br />
• The NGOs should make sure that women are actually taking pat in issuance <strong>of</strong><br />
identify cards, opening accounts in the bank, receiving compensation amounts<br />
through cheque in their name or not, etc. This will further widen the perspective<br />
<strong>of</strong> participation by the women in the project implementation.<br />
• Under the entitlement framework there are a number <strong>of</strong> provisions kept for<br />
compensation and assistances towards the losses incurred upon the impacted<br />
women headed households by the project. On the other hand, some provisions,<br />
mostly those <strong>of</strong> the assistances have been created towards reducing the<br />
probable hardship to be experienced by them in the process side by side<br />
creating scope for their sustainable socioeconomic development.<br />
• The assistances to be provided to women as a vulnerable group is creating<br />
alternative livelihood for them to ensure their sustainable socio-economic upliftment.<br />
• The implementing agencies should provide trainings for upgrading the skill in the<br />
alternative livelihoods and assist throughout till the beneficiaries start up with<br />
production and business.<br />
• Women's participation should be initiated through Self-Help Group formation in<br />
each <strong>of</strong> the villages affected by the project. These groups can then be linked to<br />
special development schemes <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Government</strong>, like DWCRA.<br />
• For monitoring and evaluation, there should be scope for women's participation.<br />
Monitoring <strong>of</strong> project inputs concerning benefit to women should invite their<br />
participation that will make the process more transparent to them. Women<br />
should be encouraged to evaluate the project outputs from their point <strong>of</strong> view<br />
and their useful suggestions should be noted for taking necessary actions for<br />
further modifications in the project creating better and congenial situation for<br />
increasing participation from women. All these are done in a participatory way<br />
which is likely to bring fruit to this vulnerable group in an expected way.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 71
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
5.9. Involvement <strong>of</strong> women in construction activities<br />
The construction works for widening and strengthening the project corridor will start<br />
after the R&R activities are over and the RoW is clear <strong>of</strong> any encroachment and land is<br />
temporarily acquired for borrow areas and construction camps. The construction<br />
contractors will set up their construction camps on identified locations where labour<br />
force required for the construction activities will be provide with temporary residential<br />
accommodation and other necessary infrastructure facilities.<br />
The labour force required for the construction activities will be mostly <strong>of</strong> high-skill nature<br />
since a lot <strong>of</strong> machine work will be involved in the construction <strong>of</strong> the highway. In<br />
addition, there will be requirement <strong>of</strong> unskilled labour where women will certainly<br />
contribute significantly. Apart from this, women as family members <strong>of</strong> the skilled and<br />
semi-skilled labourers will also stay in the construction camps and will be indirectly<br />
involved during the construction phase.<br />
The families <strong>of</strong> labourer will include their children also. The construction contractors are<br />
expected to bring along their labour force. Thus, in most cases the labourers, both male<br />
and female, will be migratory labourers. But, the involvement <strong>of</strong> local labour force,<br />
especially for unskilled activities cannot be fully ruled out. Moreover, the RAP suggests<br />
the provision <strong>of</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> man-days for local affected people. Hence, there will be<br />
involvement <strong>of</strong> local women also in the local labour force. Foreseeing the involvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> women both directly and indirectly in the construction activities, certain measures<br />
are required to be token towards welfare and well being <strong>of</strong> women and children inparticular<br />
during the construction phase.<br />
5.9.1. SPECIFIC PROVISION FOR WOMEN IN THE CONSTRUCTION CAMP<br />
It needs to be pointed out that a significant number <strong>of</strong> women and child workers along<br />
with the male member <strong>of</strong> the family are engaged in the construction work and they<br />
stay in temporary construction camps in a subhuman condition. They are likely to face<br />
many adverse conditions and realizing this, a number <strong>of</strong> welfare provisions mentioned<br />
under this section have been planned under the fold <strong>of</strong> this RAP specifically directed to<br />
cover all the women and children living in the construction camp.<br />
‣ Temporary Housing<br />
During the construction work phase, the families <strong>of</strong> labourers/workers should be<br />
provided with residential accommodation suitable to nuclear families.<br />
‣ Health Centre<br />
Health problems <strong>of</strong> the workers should be token care <strong>of</strong> by providing basic<br />
health-care' facilities through health centres temporarily set up for the<br />
construction camp. The health centre should have at least a visiting doctor,<br />
nurses, general duty staff, free medicines and minimum medical facilities to<br />
tackle first-aid requirements or minor accidental cases, linkage with nearest<br />
higher order hospital to refer patients <strong>of</strong> major illnesses and critical cases. The<br />
health centre should have MCW (Mother and Child Welfare) units for treating<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 72
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
mothers and children in the camp. Apart from this, the health centre should be<br />
provided with regular vaccinations required for children.<br />
‣ Day Crèche Facilities<br />
It is expected that among the women workers there will be mothers with infants<br />
and small children. Provision <strong>of</strong> a day crèche may solve the problems <strong>of</strong> such<br />
women who can leave behind their children in such crèche and work for the<br />
day in the construction activities. The crèche should be provided with at least a<br />
trained ICDS (Integrated Child Development Scheme) worker with 'ayahs' to<br />
look after the children. The ICDS worker, preferably women, may take care <strong>of</strong><br />
the children in a better way and can manage to provide nutritional food (as<br />
prescribed in ICDS and provided free <strong>of</strong> cost by the government) to them. In<br />
cases <strong>of</strong> emergency, she, being trained, can tackle the health problems <strong>of</strong> the<br />
children and can organize treatment linking the nearest health centre.<br />
‣ Proper Scheduling <strong>of</strong> Construction Works<br />
Owing to the demand <strong>of</strong> a fast construction work it is expected that a 24 hourslong<br />
work schedule would be in operation. Women should be exempted from<br />
night shifts as far as possible.<br />
‣ Education Facilities<br />
The construction workers are mainly mobile groups <strong>of</strong> people. They are found to<br />
move from one place to another taking along their families with them. Thus<br />
there is a need for educating their children at the place <strong>of</strong> their work. For this at<br />
least primary schools are required to be planned near the construction camps.<br />
Wherever feasible, day crèche facilities could be extended with primary<br />
educational facilities.<br />
‣ Special Measures For Controlling STD and AIDS<br />
Solitary adult males usually dominate the labour force <strong>of</strong> construction camps.<br />
They play a significant role in spreading sexually transmitted diseases. In the<br />
construction camps as well as in the neighbouring areas they are found to<br />
indulge in physical relations with different women. This unhealthy sexual<br />
behaviour gives rise to STDs and ADS. While it is difficult to stop such activities, it is<br />
wise to make provisions for means <strong>of</strong> controlling the spread <strong>of</strong> such diseases.<br />
Awareness camps for the target people, both in the construction camp and<br />
neighbouring villages as well, and supply <strong>of</strong> condoms at concession rate to the<br />
male workers may help to a large extent in this respect for controlling the deadly<br />
disease.<br />
‣ Possible areas <strong>of</strong> Women Involvement<br />
The entitlement Framework <strong>of</strong> the HPSRP includes provisions for participation <strong>of</strong><br />
and consultation with women during implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP. These<br />
provisions are already in place. Without doubt, women need to be involved in<br />
the implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP. The other areas <strong>of</strong> concern for the women and<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 73
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
more readily addressed by them will be in managing health and hygiene Issues<br />
at the construction camps (where there are possibilities <strong>of</strong> exploitation <strong>of</strong><br />
women workforce, or children), and in managing the spread <strong>of</strong> highway related<br />
diseases. However, involvement <strong>of</strong> women is seen to be more important and as<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the long-term strategy than symbolic in HPSRP. Therefore, certain<br />
positions will need to be occupied by the women in this project. The following<br />
proposals are made to involve women at various levels <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
‣ Women as Managers in the NGOs<br />
The services <strong>of</strong> NGOs will be procured to implement the RAP in HPSRP. It is<br />
proposed that the quality to be considered and/or selected for such contracts,<br />
the NGOs must fulfil the following conditions.<br />
• That the NGOs must propose at least one woman as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
key personnel. The proposed women key person shall be available<br />
to work at site for at least 50% <strong>of</strong> the duration <strong>of</strong> the contract.<br />
• That the women key persons, if selected for the contract, may be<br />
replaced during the period <strong>of</strong> contract, only with women key<br />
persons <strong>of</strong> equivalent qualifications and experience.<br />
• That the NGOs will depute a 'technical/pr<strong>of</strong>essional' team to work<br />
at the site, which will consist at least 33% <strong>of</strong> women members.<br />
Junior support personnel and administrative staff will not be<br />
considered as technical/pr<strong>of</strong>essional.<br />
‣ Women as Members <strong>of</strong> the Consultant Teams<br />
It is proposed that the following studies will be undertaken. In HPSRP by procuring<br />
consultants' services:<br />
• Mid term and end <strong>of</strong> the project Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the RAP component<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
• A benefit Monitoring study as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Project</strong> Completion Report.<br />
5.10. Other Vulnerable Families<br />
Apart from the Women Headed Families, the study also identified three other<br />
categories <strong>of</strong> families in the study area who belong to the vulnerable category and<br />
they are: Below Poverty Family, Scheduled Caste Family and disable family. The study<br />
has enumerated 25.70 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>Project</strong> Affected Families belong to the potentially<br />
vulnerable categories such as Women Headed Household, Scheduled Caste, Below<br />
Poverty Line and disable. Out <strong>of</strong> the all vulnerable families, 55.68 percent PAFs belong<br />
to the Scheduled caste category whereas 1.07 percent and 39.65 percent PAFs<br />
belongs to the Women Headed and Below Poverty Line categories respectively. As<br />
regard disability, 3.58 percent <strong>of</strong> such families who have one or more member with<br />
physical disability.<br />
Table 5.6: Distribution <strong>of</strong> Affected Vulnerable Families<br />
Corridor name SC % BPL % WHH % Disable % Total %<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 62 39.24 67 42.41 3 1.90 26 16.46 158 31.16<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 74
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Corridor name SC % BPL % WHH % Disable % Total %<br />
Una – Nerchowk 480 62.42 273 35.5 5 0.65 11 1.43 769 25.45<br />
Theog - Rohru 80 42.11 103 54.21 4 2.11 3 1.58 190 23.26<br />
Total 622 55.68 443 39.65 12 1.07 40 3.58 1117 25.70<br />
5.11. Measures for Income Restoration and up-liftment <strong>of</strong> Vulnerable People<br />
The entitlement matrix has evolved a number <strong>of</strong> measures towards resettlement and<br />
rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> vulnerable families including women headed households, SC/ST below<br />
poverty line and the poor (BPL in general) getting affected by it’s projects. The<br />
considerations therein have been compiled as follows:<br />
• All the affected families falling under the vulnerable category including the BPL<br />
will be assisted to uplift their economic status irrespective <strong>of</strong> their ownership<br />
status. Whether they possess or do not possess legal title to the lands/assets,<br />
whether they are tenants or encroachers or squatters, they will be assisted in<br />
restoring their livelihoods.<br />
• If the type <strong>of</strong> loss is agricultural land and assets for a family from the vulnerable<br />
group, he/she can claim compensation for the entire land by means <strong>of</strong> land-forland<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> accepting pecuniary compensation for the loss at replacement<br />
value, provided land <strong>of</strong> equal quality or more productive value is available. All<br />
other assistance remains the same as those for others including transitional<br />
allowances, additional grant for severance <strong>of</strong> land, residual plots, expenses on<br />
fees, taxes, etc. and one time economic rehabilitation grant in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
productive asset and training for up-grading <strong>of</strong> skills.<br />
• In case <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> commercial structure, vulnerable group are to be<br />
assisted in accordance with the entitlement matrix by considering relevant facts<br />
on family income and existing assets. A vulnerable person in this case is eligible<br />
to receive assistance for structures at replacement cost. He/she will also have<br />
the right to salvage materials from the demolished structure, one time<br />
rehabilitation grant in the form <strong>of</strong> productive asset and training to upgrade skill.<br />
Displaced vulnerable EP is entitled for 25s. mt free plot, provide such EP s land<br />
less.<br />
• In case <strong>of</strong> illegal use <strong>of</strong> the ROW, vulnerable encroachers and all squatters are<br />
to be assisted in accordance with the entitlement matrix by considering relevant<br />
facts on family income and existing assets. A vulnerable person in this case is<br />
eligible to receive assistance for structures at replacement cost. He/she will also<br />
have the right to salvage materials from the demolished structure and one time<br />
rehabilitation grant in the form <strong>of</strong> productive asset.<br />
• There is provision for additional support to vulnerable people who have been<br />
affected by the loss <strong>of</strong> livelihood / primary source <strong>of</strong> income. The assistance will<br />
be in the form <strong>of</strong> one time transitional allowance, one time economic<br />
rehabilitation grant in the form <strong>of</strong> productive asset and vocational training <strong>of</strong><br />
their choice to upgrade he skill. The training will include starting <strong>of</strong> a suitable<br />
production or service activity.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 75
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• The vulnerable will receive additional support in the form <strong>of</strong> an economic<br />
rehabilitation grant to enable them to increase their earning capacity or<br />
alternative income sources for which funds have been provided in the budget.<br />
• Inter agency linkages for income restoration. Majority <strong>of</strong> the families eligible for<br />
income restoration earn their livelihood from marginal agriculture or petty<br />
businesses, and it is imperative to ensure that the PAPs are able to reconstruct<br />
their livelihoods. Based on the market feasibility study, the list <strong>of</strong> livelihood<br />
schemes will be developed, and based on felt needs <strong>of</strong> the target group<br />
population the activities will be prioritized through people’s participation.<br />
Further, these options will be tested for their viability against availability <strong>of</strong> skills,<br />
raw material and available appropriate technology.<br />
Suitable alternative livelihood schemes will be finally selected, where training on skills<br />
upgrading, capital assistance and assistance in the form <strong>of</strong> backward-forward linkages<br />
(with respect to the selected livelihood schemes) can be provided for making these<br />
pursuits sustainable for the beneficiaries, <strong>of</strong> the target group. Income generation<br />
schemes will be developed in consultation with the project affected/displaced<br />
families. The grants received for such purpose for the project, will be used for skill<br />
development training to upgrade their existing skills, purchase <strong>of</strong> small-scale capital<br />
assets etc. While developing the enterprise or income generation activities, NGOs will<br />
contact the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), Small<br />
Industries Development Bank <strong>of</strong> India (SIDBI) and other local financial institutions to<br />
finance the economic ventures. The marketing and milk federations will also be<br />
contacted to plan sustainable economic development opportunities. In addition to<br />
project-sponsored programs, the implementing NGO will play a proactive role to<br />
mobilize the various government schemes and ensure their accessibility and benefits to<br />
the PAPs in general and vulnerable groups in particular.<br />
In India, panchayat government systems at the village, block and district/zilla levels are<br />
now responsible for planning and implementation <strong>of</strong> all antipoverty programs funded<br />
by the central and state governments. Employment for the rural poor is a key<br />
component <strong>of</strong> the anti-poverty strategy in the rural areas. Towards this objective,<br />
various schemes <strong>of</strong> employment generation have been undertaken in the past. Two<br />
programs deserve special mention.<br />
• The Jawahar Rozgar Yojana (JRY), which aims at creating sustainable<br />
employment by strengthening rural infrastructure. The target groups for<br />
employment are schedule castes; about 30 percent <strong>of</strong> the employment is<br />
provided to women.<br />
• The Integrated Rural Development Program (IRDP) is another major poverty<br />
alleviation program. It aims to create self-employment opportunities for the rural<br />
poor by subsidizing assets and inputs and through term credit advanced by<br />
financial institutions. The program guidelines require that 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
assisted families should be from SC/ST; at least 40 percent <strong>of</strong> those assisted<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 76
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
should be women. The Block Development Officer (BDO) implements IRDP<br />
programs. Many <strong>of</strong> the rural development programs are pro-poor and targeted<br />
to women and socially disadvantaged groups. The implementing NGO will work<br />
with the Panchayat governments to make available to the PAPs benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
some <strong>of</strong> the ongoing pro-poor programs for poverty reduction.<br />
ESMU will, therefore, make efforts to maintain the social support network for women<br />
headed households as far as possible so that they remain closer to their locations and<br />
/or provide special services at the new sites. Special assistance would consist <strong>of</strong> the<br />
following:<br />
• Allowing the PAPs for site selection<br />
• Relocating them near the present site wherever possible<br />
• Arranging with the contractor to construct their houses<br />
• Providing assistance with dismantling salvageable materials from their original<br />
home<br />
• Providing them priority for access to all other mitigation and development<br />
assistance<br />
• Monitoring their nutritional and health status<br />
Some examples <strong>of</strong> meeting practical needs <strong>of</strong> women that can be implemented by<br />
HPSRP through NGOs:<br />
• Reduced women’s workloads by providing standpipes, toilet facilities, and the<br />
like Improved health services by providing safe drinking water, family planning<br />
and HIV/AIDS counselling, sanitation training, immunization, etc.<br />
• Assist in childcare services for wage earning mothers, primary schools, inputs in<br />
kitchen gardening etc.<br />
• Increase access to productive resources<br />
• Promote equal opportunities for women’s employment<br />
• Encouraging women’s participation in development projects is a policy being<br />
followed by GOI. There are several ways in which women will be able to<br />
participate in the implementation Programme.<br />
• At least one third <strong>of</strong> the NGO personnel involved must be women and recruited<br />
form the local area specifically from among the PAPs.<br />
• The independent agency for evaluation will have 33% representation <strong>of</strong> women<br />
key pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and technical support team.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 77
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 6 - MINIMIZING SOCIAL IMPACT AND POVERTY<br />
6.1. Introduction<br />
Social assessment <strong>of</strong> the project is an important component <strong>of</strong> project preparation.<br />
GOI and GOHP regulations and World Bank policy requires social impact assessment<br />
during the design stage to minimize, reduce or mitigate potential negative impacts <strong>of</strong><br />
project action and enhance positive impacts, sustainability and development benefits.<br />
Although many benefits are expected from the project, social assessments have<br />
identified potential adverse impacts on roadside communities immediately and<br />
directly affected by project construction and operation. These impacts include losses<br />
<strong>of</strong> land, other assets and livelihood. Every effort has however been made to reduce<br />
potential direct negative impacts <strong>of</strong> the project, both in terms <strong>of</strong> environment and<br />
social issues. Where possible from a technical and economic perspective, designs have<br />
been prepared accordingly to minimize the negative Impacts.<br />
6.2. Design and R&R Co-ordination<br />
The prime objective <strong>of</strong> the RAP is to minimize or minimize negative impact on the<br />
people/community because <strong>of</strong> the project execution. Therefore, during preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
the project, due consideration was given to minimize the negative impacts within the<br />
limitations <strong>of</strong> technical requirements and cost effectiveness. The proposed corridors<br />
pass through built up areas and open hilly rural areas. The built up areas generally have<br />
dense developments on either side <strong>of</strong> the existing road including residential and<br />
commercial. Since the RoW is not marked on ground and land acquired by the<br />
department long time ago, there is some form <strong>of</strong> encroachment on RoW for use <strong>of</strong><br />
agriculture, fruit orchard and extended part <strong>of</strong> structure.<br />
6.3. Over all Impact <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Project</strong><br />
As a result different design approaches were adopted in the project. The existing<br />
carriageway width <strong>of</strong> roads varies from 5.5 m to 11m. The proposed rood design would<br />
require 12m. to 21m. wide strip <strong>of</strong> land, which includes carriageway, shoulder, slopes,<br />
drain etc. in many <strong>of</strong> the stretches <strong>of</strong> corridors the proposed developments has been<br />
accommodated within the available RoW; therefore additional land requirement for<br />
improvement at those stretches has been avoided. In order to minimize displacement<br />
in Bhoota a bypass has been proposed. The project though adopted corridor <strong>of</strong><br />
impact concept planning, there would be impact on the people using the RoW<br />
illegally and some beyond due to improvement in road geometry, improving blind<br />
curves, replacing substandard structures etc. Provisions have been made in the<br />
entitlement policy to address the issues for both title holders and non-title holder.<br />
Table 6.1: Minimizing impact on number <strong>of</strong> Structures<br />
Corridor<br />
Within 30 mt. Within CoI Total Saving<br />
R C R+C R C R+C R C R+C<br />
Mehatpur-Amb 442 3217 871 33 103 19 409 3114 852<br />
Una-Ner Chowk 1779 4326 1852 93 210 79 1686 4116 1773<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 78
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Corridor<br />
Within 30 mt. Within CoI Total Saving<br />
R C R+C R C R+C R C R+C<br />
Theog-Rohru 351 352 260 18 31 15 333 321 245<br />
Total 2572 7895 2983 144 344 113 2428 7551 2870<br />
Although three corridors are getting widened/ upgraded over a stretch <strong>of</strong> 250 kms,<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the effort for minimizing the adverse effects, a total number <strong>of</strong> 427 families<br />
are getting displaced either by way <strong>of</strong> losing residential or commercial or both types <strong>of</strong><br />
structures out <strong>of</strong> 4346 numbers <strong>of</strong> <strong>Project</strong> Affected Families (PAFs) for the entire project.<br />
The relatively low number <strong>of</strong> affected families, particularly very less number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Project</strong><br />
Displaced Families is due to the sincere effort for minimizing the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project on people.<br />
Table 6.2: Affected Persons and Families<br />
Corridor PAPs PAFs PDFs<br />
Mehatpur-Amb 2698 507 127<br />
Una-Ner Chowk 11725 3022 245<br />
Theog-Rohru 2473 817 55<br />
Total 16896 4346 427<br />
6.4. The Need for Minimization <strong>of</strong> Impact<br />
Infrastructure projects not only bring the prosperity to the region but also leave behind<br />
number <strong>of</strong> adverse impact on the society. Such adverse impacts include loss <strong>of</strong><br />
property, loss <strong>of</strong> livelihood, loss <strong>of</strong> community property, dividing the community. If such<br />
negative impacts are not addressed properly, it may happen that the outcome <strong>of</strong> a<br />
project negative impacts would outweighs the project positive impacts, thus putting<br />
question mark on project sustainability. The World Bank Policy and the National Policy<br />
on Resettlement & Rehabilitation have rightly acknowledged the seriousness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
issue and advocates for minimising negative impact by every possible method and<br />
option. The sprit <strong>of</strong> these policies has been followed while preparing the project.<br />
6.5. Measures Taken to Minimize Negative Social Impacts<br />
Due importance has been given to environmental and social issues while designing he<br />
road. The coordination between social and design team helped in reducing the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> PAPs. In the design, various mitigation measures incorporated include:<br />
6.5.1. DELINEATION OF COI<br />
Right <strong>of</strong> way is the public land owned by the State <strong>Government</strong> and administered by<br />
the PWD for the existing road. Right <strong>of</strong> way held by the PWD is the lawfully acquired<br />
corridor <strong>of</strong> land. Using available records with the PWD and the revenue department,<br />
R&R team has verified the boundaries <strong>of</strong> legal right <strong>of</strong> way as well as boundaries <strong>of</strong><br />
private properties within and in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the corridor <strong>of</strong> impact. The limit <strong>of</strong><br />
displacement in the project will be limited to the corridor <strong>of</strong> Impact. The corridor <strong>of</strong><br />
impact is the corridor required for the actual construction <strong>of</strong> the road, including<br />
carriageway, shoulders embankments and longitudinal drainage. Within this corridor<br />
there should be no structures or hindrances. The corridor <strong>of</strong> impact for the project is as<br />
per the detail design requirement and in case <strong>of</strong> non availability <strong>of</strong> same, broadly in<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 79
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
open and build up areas it is 13meters in hilly terrain & 15 meter in rolling terrain,<br />
however in build up areas where it is not possible 9 mt. in hilly terrain and 10 meters in<br />
rolling terrain. The CoI has been found to be useful way <strong>of</strong> minimizing the social<br />
impacts. The project will not displace or adversely affect any person outside the CoI.<br />
6.5.2. CONCENTRIC WIDENING<br />
The approach <strong>of</strong> concentric widening has been adopted major part <strong>of</strong> the road<br />
length in all the corridors to avoid land acquisition. This method is very suitable in<br />
settlement and market sections to avoid impact on structure as well. In addition to this<br />
the concentric widening approach has been followed in major part <strong>of</strong> the alignment<br />
to avoid land acquisition.<br />
6.5.3. PROVISIONS OF COVERED DRAINAGE<br />
To reduce the land intake and impact on the structures along the highway, covered<br />
drainage has been proposed at various locations and specifically in settlement<br />
sections where the properties are just at the edge <strong>of</strong> RoW. The location and length <strong>of</strong><br />
such measures provided in the project are given below in the table 6.3.<br />
Table 6.3: Location <strong>of</strong> covered drainage to reduce social impact<br />
Sl. no. Mehatpur-Amb Una-Ner Chowk Theog-Rohru<br />
Chainage Length in Locations Length in Locations Length in mt.<br />
mt.<br />
mt.<br />
1. 5.60 7.14 1540 0.00 1.00 2000 17.50 17.92 840<br />
2. 8.60 8.75 150 26.90 27.60 0700 21.67 21.82 300<br />
3. 10.64 10.76 120 38.6 39.2 0600 23.80 24.02 450<br />
4. 11.22 11.45 230 39.6 40.05 0450 24.10 24.56 920<br />
5. 13.77 13.82 050 41.5 42.5 1000 28.48 28.70 440<br />
6. 16.45 16.81 360 47.00 47.50 1000 30.60 30.80 400<br />
7. 18.59 19.00 820 72.75 73.40 650 48.20 48.35 300<br />
8. 21.50 21.71 420 75.00 75.40 400 78.90 79.10 400<br />
9. 21.82 22.41 590 79.00 79.50 500 79.90 80.60 1400<br />
10. 23.10 23.35 250 80.60 80.77 170<br />
11. 26.30 26.46 160 81.00 82.00 1000<br />
12. 34.34 34.43 090 85.40 85.92 520<br />
13. 36.20 36.40 200 89.30 90.00 700<br />
14. 38.10 38.50 400 91.00 92.50 1500<br />
15. 47.10 47.70 600 120.20 121.40 2400<br />
16. 50.10 50.20 100<br />
Total 6080 13590 5450<br />
6.5.4. PROVISION OF TOE WALL/RETAINING WALL<br />
Provision <strong>of</strong> toe wall and retaining wall can reduce the impact in many respects and<br />
specifically reducing the land intake and avoiding the structures getting impacted due<br />
to slope <strong>of</strong> embankment. In Mehatpu – Una road the length <strong>of</strong> such protection work is<br />
3378 meters and in case <strong>of</strong> Una - Nerchowk it is 3690 meters (table 6.4). The details <strong>of</strong><br />
protection work for Theog – Rohru road is given in Annexure V.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 80
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Table 6.4: Location <strong>of</strong> toe wall/ retaining wall to reduce impact<br />
Sl.<br />
Mehatpur - Amb<br />
Una - Nerchowk<br />
No. Start Ch. End Ch. Length (m) Start Ch. End Ch. Length (m)<br />
1. 7.320 7.350 30 45.275 45.295 20<br />
2. 7.640 7.660 20 45.615 45.675 60<br />
3. 8.150 8.240 180 46.095 46.135 40<br />
4. 8.500 8.520 20 52.395 52.475 80<br />
5. 9.740 9.780 40 54.595 54.605 10<br />
6. 10.432 10.500 68 55.015 55.055 40<br />
7. 10.780 10.840 60 55.435 55.455 20<br />
8. 11.080 11.140 120 55.875 56.055 180<br />
9. 11.180 11.220 40 55.955 56.055 100<br />
10. 11.640 11.850 210 57.675 57.755 80<br />
11. 11.920 12.180 260 57.895 57.915 20<br />
12. 12.200 12.300 200 58.115 58.155 40<br />
13. 13.500 13.580 80 58.135 58.155 20<br />
14. 15.440 15.480 40 58.335 58.355 20<br />
15. 16.020 16.100 80 58.335 58.355 20<br />
16. 16.300 16.400 100 59.655 59.665 10<br />
17. 28.400 28.440 40 59.895 59.995 100<br />
18. 30.360 30.540 180 60.735 60.755 20<br />
19. 30.850 30.960 110 60.975 60.995 20<br />
20. 31.520 31.600 80 61.575 61.585 10<br />
21. 32.530 32.570 80 63 63.04 40<br />
22. 32.580 32.650 70 63.02 63.04 20<br />
23. 34.040 34.280 240 63.22 63.40 180<br />
24. 34.480 34.490 10 63.22 63.32 100<br />
25. 38.900 39.120 220 64.935 64.955 20<br />
26. 41.180 41.500 320 64.995 65.005 10<br />
27. 41.860 41.890 60 65.975 66.115 140<br />
28. 42.000 42.050 50 65.975 66.075 100<br />
29. 42.580 42.700 120 66.215 66.295 80<br />
30. 42.940 43.000 60 66.575 66.615 40<br />
31. 48.000 48.050 50 66.935 67.235 300<br />
32. 48.100 48.140 40 67.175 67.235 60<br />
33. 49.000 49.100 100 69.755 69.775 20<br />
34. 69.975 69.985 10<br />
35. 70.295 70.315 20<br />
36. 70.455 70.475 20<br />
37. 70.875 70.895 20<br />
38. 72.855 72.865 10<br />
39. 73.015 73.035 20<br />
40. 76.005 76.015 10<br />
41. 76.195 76.295 100<br />
42. 76.195 76.205 10<br />
43. 76.535 76.555 20<br />
44. 78.435 78.445 10<br />
45. 78.775 78.795 20<br />
46. 79.455 79.495 40<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 81
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Sl.<br />
Mehatpur - Amb<br />
Una - Nerchowk<br />
No. Start Ch. End Ch. Length (m) Start Ch. End Ch. Length (m)<br />
47. 80.775 80.785 10<br />
48. 80.815 80.835 20<br />
49. 81.115 81.135 20<br />
50. 81.275 81.295 20<br />
51. 82.690 82.710 20<br />
52. 82.750 82.770 20<br />
53. 82.930 82.990 60<br />
54. 83.290 83.390 100<br />
55. 83.590 83.610 20<br />
56. 83.770 83.870 100<br />
57. 83.890 83.930 40<br />
58. 84.250 84.26 10<br />
59. 84.530 84.550 20<br />
60. 84.650 84.670 20<br />
61. 85.250 85.290 40<br />
62. 85.350 85.390 40<br />
63. 85.430 85.490 60<br />
64. 85.650 85.670 20<br />
65. 86.150 86.330 180<br />
66. 86.150 86.330 180<br />
67. 90.1 90.26 160<br />
68. 90.14 90.26 120<br />
69. 90.56 90.60 40<br />
70. 90.56 90.6 40<br />
Total (m) 3378 3690<br />
6.5.5. SPECIFIC PROTECTION TO SAVE STRUCTURES ON UPHILL<br />
In addition to provision <strong>of</strong> covered drain in settlement area and provision <strong>of</strong> toe wall<br />
and retaining wall, location specific measures have been provided to protect the<br />
structures along the corridor. This specific measure are provided in Una – Nerchowk<br />
and Theog –Rohru road since the roads fall in hilly terrain and structures are at higher<br />
level than the road. Any cutting and widening may affect the structures strength and<br />
stability. Therefore, the protection measures provided for such locations are given in<br />
table 6.5.<br />
Table 6.5: Protection measures for structures on uphill<br />
Sl. no. Una-Ner Chowk<br />
Theog-Rohru<br />
Locations Length in mt. Locations Length in mt.<br />
1. LHS 36.840 36.880 40<br />
2. 21.1 21.13 30 37.300 37.320 20<br />
3. 21.13 21.16 30 38.000 38.030 30<br />
4. 61.76 61.78 20 38.390 38.430 40<br />
5. 66.28 66.31 30 38.750 38.765 15<br />
6. 71.05 71.07 20 39.440 39.470 30<br />
7. 71.96 71.98 20 40.095 40.110 15<br />
8. 120.82 120.84 20 45.645 45.900 255<br />
9. 120.88 120.91 30 45.890 45.910 20<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 82
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Sl. no. Una-Ner Chowk<br />
Theog-Rohru<br />
Locations Length in mt. Locations Length in mt.<br />
10. RHS 46.150 46.170 20<br />
11. 20.2 20.22 20 52.110 52.130 20<br />
12. 65.92 65.94 20 52.660 52.700 40<br />
13. 71.98 72.01 30 53.145 53.165 20<br />
14. 73.2 73.22 20 53.380 53.410 30<br />
15. 73.22 73.24 20 54.140 54.160 20<br />
16. 73.98 74 20 54.280 54.300 20<br />
17. 75.81 75.83 20 53.910 53.930 20<br />
18. 75.93 75.95 20 55.230 55.250 20<br />
19. 75.95 75.97 20 55.320 55.340 20<br />
20. 76.18 76.2 20 55.980 56.020 40<br />
21. 76.2 76.22 20 56.300 56.320 20<br />
22. 76.64 76.66 20 56.400 56.440 40<br />
23. 76.25 76.28 30 56.490 56.510 20<br />
24. 76.77 76.79 20 56.540 56.560 20<br />
25. 76.86 76.89 30 56.570 56.600 30<br />
26. 76.89 76.91 20 56.600 56.620 20<br />
27. 77.22 77.24 20 57.200 57.220 20<br />
28. 77.3 77.32 20 57.400 57.420 20<br />
29. 79.21 79.23 20 57.660 57.680 20<br />
30. 79.28 79.3 20 57.880 57.910 30<br />
31. 79.47 79.49 20 58.080 58.100 20<br />
32. 79.49 79.51 20 58.245 58.270 25<br />
33. 80.75 80.77 20 58.290 58.310 20<br />
34. 84.85 84.87 20 59.150 59.170 20<br />
35. 93.97 94 30 59.260 59.280 20<br />
36. 94 94.01 10 59.415 59.440 25<br />
37. 95.55 95.58 30 59.630 59.650 20<br />
38. 95.58 95.6 20 60.180 60.240 60<br />
39. 113.1 113.12 20 60.255 60.280 25<br />
40. 113.02 113.04 20 60.970 60.985 15<br />
41. 114.7 114.72 20 61.180 61.200 20<br />
42. 114.74 114.77 30 61.200 61.220 20<br />
43. 115.2 115.22 20 62.080 62.100 20<br />
44. 115.29 115.31 20 62.230 62.250 20<br />
45. 115.31 115.34 30 62.575 62.600 25<br />
46. 115.34 115.36 20 66.390 66.425 35<br />
47. 115.47 115.49 20 67.140 67.160 20<br />
48. 115.93 115.95 20 67.160 67.180 20<br />
49. 116.48 116.5 20 67.960 67.980 20<br />
50. 67.990 68.000 10<br />
51. 68.030 68.050 20<br />
52. 69.790 69.820 30<br />
53. 69.900 69.940 40<br />
54. 69.980 70.020 40<br />
55. 72.885 72.905 20<br />
56. 73.950 73.965 15<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 83
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Sl. no. Una-Ner Chowk<br />
Theog-Rohru<br />
Locations Length in mt. Locations Length in mt.<br />
57. 74.040 74.100 60<br />
58. 74.110 74.130 20<br />
59. 74.140 74.180 40<br />
60. 74.210 74.240 30<br />
61. 74.240 74.280 40<br />
62. 74.650 74.680 30<br />
63. 76.290 76.320 30<br />
64. 76.930 76.950 20<br />
65. 76.960 77.000 40<br />
66. 77.000 77.040 40<br />
67. 77.040 77.060 20<br />
68. 77.060 77.080 20<br />
69. 77.205 77.230 25<br />
70. 77.120 77.190 70<br />
71. 77.300 77.330 30<br />
72. 77.330 77.350 20<br />
73. 77.380 77.400 20<br />
74. 77.460 77.500 40<br />
75. 77.500 77.540 40<br />
76. 77.540 77.590 50<br />
77. 77.600 77.640 40<br />
78. 77.650 77.670 20<br />
79. 77.700 77.720 20<br />
80. 77.760 77.800 40<br />
81. 77.800 77.840 40<br />
82. 77.840 77.860 20<br />
Total 1040 2465<br />
6.5.6. PROVISION OF BYPASSES<br />
Provision <strong>of</strong> bypass is another way <strong>of</strong> reducing the social impact due to the project. This<br />
is especially effective in location <strong>of</strong> heavy concentration <strong>of</strong> properties along the road<br />
and non availability <strong>of</strong> adequate with to built a safe road. The bypass also acts long<br />
term solution to safety issues in congested areas by way <strong>of</strong> avoiding it altogether.<br />
Though the construction <strong>of</strong> bypass will not completely minimise the impact since some<br />
people will be affected by way <strong>of</strong> land acquisition, however it reduces the magnitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> impact to the great extent. The location and number <strong>of</strong> properties saved in the<br />
project are given below in the table 6.6.<br />
6.5.6.1. Bhoota Bypass<br />
Table 6.6: No. <strong>of</strong> bypass to reduce social impact<br />
Corridor<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> No. <strong>of</strong> properties saved<br />
bypass<br />
Mehatpur-Amb Nil Nil<br />
Una-Ner Chowk 1 323<br />
Theog-Rohru Nil Nil<br />
Total 1 323<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 84
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Constraints<br />
Presence <strong>of</strong> residential and commercial structures, mainly <strong>of</strong> permanent in nature, is<br />
located along the road. The clear passageway available inside the Bhoota settlements<br />
is only 5 to 12m for a stretch <strong>of</strong> 2000m in addition to deficiencies in the road geometry.<br />
Widening <strong>of</strong> the existing road involved major displacement <strong>of</strong> persons and property.<br />
Options evaluated for remedial action<br />
(i) Option I: Widening the existing road<br />
To retain the existing alignment and to widen on both sides would involve acquisition <strong>of</strong><br />
a large number <strong>of</strong> built-up commercial and residential properties, resulting in<br />
resettlement and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> displaced persons, as well as incurring large costs to<br />
move overhead and underground utilities. In addition to this, during construction safety<br />
factor will be a major concern.<br />
(ii) Option II: Bypass on Left Hand Side<br />
The bypass takes <strong>of</strong>f from kilometre stone 67 and traverses through few private land,<br />
stream and joins National Highway number 88. There is already a kutcha alignment<br />
existing at the proposed bypass road. About one third <strong>of</strong> the length will have either via<br />
duct or bridge structure at the National Highway end for connectivity. The alignment<br />
will have no impact on private structure and very minimum requirement <strong>of</strong> land since<br />
some land is available with department and a good length <strong>of</strong> road will pass over<br />
stream.<br />
Table 6.7: Bhoota Bypass evaluation as remedial measures<br />
Criteria Option I Option II<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> structure Significant Nil<br />
Loss livelihood Significant Nil<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> land High Minimal<br />
Displacement Very high Nil<br />
Disturbances to utilities Very high Nil<br />
Safety issue during construction Very high Negligible<br />
Safety issue in operation stage High Negligible<br />
Social cost Significant Minimal<br />
6.5.7. REDUCTION OF SPEED<br />
In addition to the various measures discussed above, reduction in travel speed is also<br />
used in the project to minimise the social impacts. This approach does help in land<br />
acquisition reduction and impact on properties along the corridor. These are mainly<br />
engineering measures which includes singe, speed breakers, road markings etc.<br />
6.5.8. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> alternatives is another method used extensively in the project to reduce the<br />
social impact. This process has been adopted successfully in the HPSRP in selecting the<br />
option having least social impact and at the same time meeting the engineering<br />
requirements. This exercise was carried out jointly with the design, bridge, environment,<br />
social teams, PWD <strong>of</strong>ficials from head quarter and local divisions and the likely project<br />
affected families.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 85
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Joint site visit for alignment finalisation<br />
6.6 <strong>Project</strong> Benefits<br />
It is unfair to say that the developmental projects only bring the adverse impact on the<br />
people. Such projects have wide spread beneficial impact at micro as well as macro<br />
level. At the macro level, the HPSRP will contribute to the substantial financial and<br />
social benefits to the state by up-gradation <strong>of</strong> the strategic State Highways. This project<br />
will propel the:<br />
• Over-all transport capability in <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong>.<br />
• Journey speed on the highways will increase where there will be substantial<br />
savings in terms <strong>of</strong> vehicle operating costs and time.<br />
• The project will lead to reduction in road congestion, improvement <strong>of</strong> road-side<br />
drainage condition, especially in the urban sections <strong>of</strong> the roads.<br />
• A major contribution <strong>of</strong> the project will be towards increased safety levels (i.e.,<br />
reduction in the propensity to have accidents), for both pedestrians as well as<br />
motorists.<br />
• The project will facilitate higher accessibility to a large part <strong>of</strong> the state and will<br />
relieve several bottlenecks to development.<br />
• Industrial sector in the state is expected to receive a significant boost as a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> this. New areas will be opened up for urban-industrial development. Besides<br />
this, there will be several other macro-scopic and indirect benefits.<br />
On a micro level (local scale), people will be provided with facilities like<br />
• Access roads, parking lanes<br />
• bus stops, bus bays<br />
• improved storm water drainage in urban stretches,<br />
• Demarcated pedestrian road crossing areas,<br />
• Sign boards for the safety<br />
• Provisions at schools<br />
• Footpaths, improved highway-side environment, etc.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 86
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
In addition to these, there are intangible benefits will accrued due to the project which<br />
can not be quantified. Some <strong>of</strong> the improvement measures taken on road for the<br />
public safety and benefits are detail out in tables below.<br />
6.6.1. REALIGNMENT:<br />
The project will contribute in a significant manner in improving the road geometry and<br />
making it safe for the road users and the pedestrians. The roads have many such<br />
locations with very sharp curves, thus the improvement section details are presented in<br />
table 6.8.<br />
Table 6.8: Realignment Sections for Geometry improvement<br />
Rohru-Theog Una-Nerchowk Mehtpur-Amb<br />
Length<br />
(Km)<br />
Start<br />
Ch.<br />
Length<br />
(Km)<br />
Start<br />
Ch.<br />
End<br />
Ch.<br />
Length<br />
(Km)<br />
S. No. Start Ch. End Ch.<br />
End Ch.<br />
1 19.48 19.60 0.12 7.70 7.90 0.20 13.10 13.26 0.16<br />
2 32.20 32.30 0.10 9.36 9.58 0.22 19.58 19.90 0.32<br />
3 42.05 42.30 0.25 10.34 10.62 0.28 22.80 23.20 0.40<br />
4 66.78 66.93 0.15 10.84 11.02 0.18 24.83 25.48 0.65<br />
5 70.30 70.50 0.20 14.64 15.70 1.06 28.61 28.90 0.29<br />
6 76.76 77.05 0.29 16.78 17.00 0.22 31.00 31.50 0.50<br />
7 77.80 78.00 0.20 19.00 19.80 0.80 32.80 33.20 0.40<br />
8 25.20 25.60 0.40 38.58 38.82 0.24<br />
9 35.45 35.80 0.35 39.30 39.60 0.30<br />
10 36.10 36.26 0.16 44.90 45.03 0.13<br />
11 41.30 41.87 0.57 45.50 46.05 0.55<br />
12 50.76 50.98 0.22 46.63 46.78 0.15<br />
13 55.86 56.10 0.24<br />
14 63.00 63.30 0.30<br />
15 65.75 66.10 0.35<br />
16 66.90 67.20 0.30<br />
17 86.02 86.42 0.40<br />
18 86.62 87.00 0.38<br />
19 90.14 90.78 0.64<br />
20 92.70 93.20 0.50<br />
21 96.60 96.70 0.10<br />
22 97.70 97.80 0.10<br />
23 98.70 98.85 0.15<br />
24 103.36 103.44 0.08<br />
25 103.50 104.00 0.50<br />
26 104.30 104.50 0.20<br />
27 104.90 105.02 0.12<br />
28 112.30 112.45 0.15<br />
29 115.90 117.30 1.40<br />
Total 1.31 10.57 4.09<br />
6.6.2. RAIN SHELTER & BUS BAY:<br />
Based on the details <strong>of</strong> the existing bus shelter and the consultations carried out by<br />
both social and environmental team, detailed schedule has been prepared for the rain<br />
shelter & bus bay. An attempt has been made to provide the bus shelter on either side,<br />
<strong>of</strong> the centre line so that weaving <strong>of</strong> the vehicles using the bus shelter would not<br />
impinge on the free and safe movement <strong>of</strong> the traffic. However, due to restriction in<br />
site condition either due to heavily built-up or topography there is instances where this<br />
facility is provided only on one side. It may happen at locations there may not be<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 87
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
enough space to build the Rain Shelter due to available width and the permanent<br />
structures in such cased only bus bay is provided. The summary <strong>of</strong> the facility is as under<br />
in table 6.9.<br />
Table 6.9: Provision <strong>of</strong> Rain Shelter on project roads<br />
Rohru-Theog Una-Nerchowk Mehatpur-Amb<br />
Location Side with respect<br />
to Design C.L<br />
Location Side with<br />
respect to<br />
Design C.L<br />
Location Side with<br />
respect to<br />
Design C.L<br />
3.12 RHS 2.70 LHS RHS 6.50 LHS RHS<br />
16.95 RHS 3.60 LHS RHS 7.90 LHS RHS<br />
18.70 LHS 6.25 LHS RHS 8.50 RHS<br />
21.09 LHS 8.10 LHS RHS 8.80 LHS<br />
21.70 LHS 10.80 LHS RHS 10.30 LHS RHS<br />
23.53 LHS 12.30 LHS RHS 13.50 LHS<br />
23.75 LHS 23.44 RHS 13.80 RHS<br />
26.35 LHS 26.86 LHS RHS 14.05 LHS RHS<br />
29.22 RHS 30.51 LHS RHS 17.00 LHS RHS<br />
34.50 LHS 33.61 LHS 18.50 LHS RHS<br />
37.60 LHS 33.91 RHS 21.55 LHS RHS<br />
38.25 LHS 35.41 LHS 22.60 LHS<br />
39.77 LHS 35.91 RHS 24.10 LHS RHS<br />
40.60 LHS 39.42 RHS 24.70 LHS RHS<br />
41.90 LHS 47.02 LHS RHS 28.80 LHS RHS<br />
43.25 LHS 47.72 LHS 30.30 RHS<br />
48.50 LHS 49.32 LHS 30.70 LHS<br />
50.10 LHS 49.52 RHS 31.80 LHS RHS<br />
51.70 LHS 50.82 LHS RHS 32.70 LHS RHS<br />
54.25 LHS 52.53 LHS RHS 33.60 LHS RHS<br />
56.18 LHS 54.42 LHS 34.50 LHS<br />
56.60 LHS 54.53 RHS 36.10 LHS<br />
59.00 LHS 58.53 RHS 36.20 RHS<br />
61.00 LHS 59.53 LHS 36.52 LHS RHS<br />
63.20 LHS 60.53 RHS 37.20 LHS RHS<br />
64.60 LHS 62.93 RHS 39.80 LHS RHS<br />
66.40 LHS 65.53 LHS 44.10 LHS RHS<br />
68.90 LHS 65.93 RHS 47.30 LHS<br />
69.90 LHS 70.93 LHS 47.45 RHS<br />
Rohru<br />
Town LHS RHS 73.03 LHS 50.30 LHS RHS<br />
73.63 LHS<br />
76.23 LHS<br />
76.63 LHS<br />
78.48 LHS<br />
6.6.3. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT<br />
Major intersections along the project road section have been identified in order to<br />
asses the requirements for type <strong>of</strong> improvement, turning movement surveys were<br />
carried at important junction locations. From the analysis <strong>of</strong> the turning movement<br />
survey junction improvement plan has been designed for smooth and traffic<br />
movement. The details <strong>of</strong> Major intersections along the project road are as given under<br />
in table 6.10.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 88
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Table 6.10: Major Intersections along the Roads<br />
Theog - Rohru Una-Nerchowk Mehatpur-Amb<br />
Sl. No. Chainage<br />
(km)<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Junction<br />
Chainage<br />
(km)<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Junction<br />
Chainage<br />
(km)<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Junction<br />
1 0.00 T 0.00 T 17.95 Y<br />
2 4.90 Y 27.45 Y 21.90 T<br />
3 11.20 Y 35.80 Y 36.30 T<br />
4 17.30 T 47.15 Y 38.58 Y<br />
5 21.70 Y 49.00 Y 50.30 T<br />
6 48.20 Y 65.80 T<br />
7 59.90 Y 67.20 T<br />
8 69.00 Y 67.20 T<br />
9 85.85 Y<br />
10 108.70 Y<br />
11 121.70 T<br />
6.7. Poverty Assessment<br />
6.7.1. BACKGROUND<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> the existing poverty scenario in the project area is an important<br />
component <strong>of</strong> social impact assessment. In the present <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> Road Sector<br />
Development <strong>Project</strong>, investment <strong>of</strong> such a scale will have different types <strong>of</strong> impacts<br />
and <strong>of</strong> different magnitude. The relevance <strong>of</strong> poverty assessment is valid from the<br />
aspects that there will be impact on people by way <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> property, livelihood, and<br />
community resources. It may also be possible that the <strong>Project</strong> affected persons (APs)<br />
who are already impoverished and below the poverty line are more vulnerable to any<br />
changes in the socio-economic pattern induced due to the road development<br />
project. At the same time Rood infrastructure is critical to economic development <strong>of</strong><br />
the area and its population. Besides providing improved transport services, it reduces<br />
travel time and transport costs. Improved roads help the population to have better<br />
access to health, education and other social services. It opens new economic and<br />
employment opportunities through linkages to new markets, production centers and<br />
other areas <strong>of</strong> economic opportunities. Thus, there is a strong link between transport<br />
and poverty reduction in the area.<br />
This chapter deals in identification <strong>of</strong> such vulnerable population, their socio-economic<br />
characteristics in the region and their susceptibility to risks due to the project and the<br />
mitigation strategy to restore and improve the conditions <strong>of</strong> such population.<br />
6.7.2. POVERTY IN THE STATE<br />
Table 6.12 clearly shows that there is a large variation in head count ratios for <strong>Himachal</strong><br />
<strong>Pradesh</strong> as obtained by using different poverty lines. Despite these variations it is amply<br />
clear that poverty actually increased in <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> between 1987–88 and 1993–<br />
94. The increase in poverty is more pronounced in rural areas. Head count ratio using<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficial poverty line (OPL) was 25.23 per cent in 1987–88 which increased to 33.97 per<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 89
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
cent in 1993–94. Similarly, head count ratio (HCRs) obtained by using expert group<br />
poverty line (EOPL) and alternative poverty line (APL) have certainly increased during<br />
this period. The incidence <strong>of</strong> poverty has also increased in urban areas. HCRs in urban<br />
areas have increased from 4.18 per cent in 1987–88 to 5.61 per cent in 1993–94 and<br />
from 1.31 per cent in 1987–88 to 2.97 per cent in 1993–94 using the OPL and APL,<br />
respectively. When calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> the EOPL, the HCR for urban areas <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> has declined marginally from 6.98 per cent to 6.93 per cent during<br />
the period between 1987–88 and 1993–94.<br />
TABLE 6.11: Head Count Ratios for <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong><br />
Year/NSSO Round Poverty line used Combined Rural Urban<br />
43rd Round<br />
(1987–88)<br />
OPL 23.21 25.23 4.18<br />
EOPL 16.03 16.68 6.98<br />
APL 13.41 14.28 1.31<br />
50th Round<br />
(1993–94)<br />
OPL 31.58 33.97 5.61<br />
EOPL 21.81 23.18 6.93<br />
APL 18.53 19.98 2.97<br />
Note: OPL: Official Poverty Line, based on the <strong>of</strong>ficial norm and updated using disaggregated price<br />
adjustment suggested by Minhas et al (1988).<br />
EOPL: Expert Group Official Poverty Line, based on the <strong>of</strong>ficial norm and updated using price adjustment<br />
suggested by the Expert Group (1993).<br />
Source: Counting the Poor, Sarvekshana Analytical Report Number 1, Department <strong>of</strong> Statistics,<br />
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the possible reasons for the increase in the incidence <strong>of</strong> poverty in <strong>Himachal</strong><br />
<strong>Pradesh</strong> can be the failure <strong>of</strong> development programmes to generate employment<br />
corresponding to the rate <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> population. This can be inferred from having a<br />
glance at the dependency ratios for rural and urban areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> for<br />
two different years as exhibited in Table 6.12.<br />
TABLE 6.12: Dependency Ratios in <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong><br />
A. Dependency ratio taken as the ratio <strong>of</strong><br />
total population between the age group<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0–14 years and that in 59 years and<br />
above to the population in the age group<br />
<strong>of</strong> 15–58 years (expressed as %age)<br />
B. Dependency ratios taken as persons per<br />
worker<br />
1981 1991<br />
Rural 92.31 80.72<br />
Urban 60.54 57.31<br />
Combined 89.46 78.22<br />
Rural 2.33<br />
Urban 2.84 2.86<br />
Combined 2.36 2.34<br />
Dependents are those who are either not able to work or are unable to get<br />
employment over those who are engaged in productive employment. This can be<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 90
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
measured in two ways. First, the ratio <strong>of</strong> the population unable to work to those<br />
engaged in productive employment can reflect in the population structure indicating<br />
the level <strong>of</strong> dependency <strong>of</strong> the former. The second way <strong>of</strong> showing the level <strong>of</strong><br />
dependence is per worker population. Part A <strong>of</strong> Table 6.2 shows that the structure <strong>of</strong><br />
population during the period between 1981 and 1991 has changed in such a way that<br />
the proportion <strong>of</strong> productive population in total population has increased. Hence, this<br />
change in structure <strong>of</strong> population does not show consistency with the increase in<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> poverty. The second measure showing dependency level indicates that<br />
the dependency ratio has increased only in urban areas whereas dependency ratio<br />
for rural areas and for the State as a whole has actually declined marginally. The<br />
reasons for increase in the incidence <strong>of</strong> poverty in the State over the period <strong>of</strong><br />
reference need a separate examination. Perhaps the poverty line for determining the<br />
HCRs needs to be redefined keeping in view the geological and climatic conditions<br />
affecting daily consumption in terms <strong>of</strong> calories.<br />
6.7.3. POVERTY LEVEL IN PROJECT INFLUENCED DISTRICTS<br />
A household survey in the rural areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> conducted by the<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Rural Development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> to assess the number <strong>of</strong> rural<br />
families living below the poverty line is the only information available to have an idea<br />
about the incidence <strong>of</strong> poverty in the districts. The latest survey conducted by the<br />
Department is for the year 1998–99. A survey to assess number <strong>of</strong> households living<br />
below poverty line in the urban areas in various districts <strong>of</strong> the State was conducted by<br />
the Department <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics in the year 1981 and no other survey has<br />
been conducted by the Department after that. Since information pertaining to 1981<br />
has little relevance in the present context, it is not being incorporated here. Table 3.13<br />
clearly shows that at 33.67 per cent the maximum number <strong>of</strong> families in rural areas<br />
living below the poverty line is in the Shimla district. At 19.06 per cent, district Una has<br />
the distinction <strong>of</strong> having minimum number <strong>of</strong> rural households living below the poverty<br />
line. Overall, in <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong>, 27.62 per cent <strong>of</strong> rural families live below the poverty<br />
line. The districts have been ranked in terms <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> rural families living below<br />
poverty line in Table 6.13. The district with highest percentage <strong>of</strong> rural families living<br />
below poverty line has been ranked first and so on.<br />
TABLE 6.13: Survey on Poor Families (1998–99) – Rural<br />
District No. <strong>of</strong> rural<br />
households<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> rural families<br />
below poverty line<br />
% <strong>of</strong> families below<br />
poverty line<br />
Bilaspur 65,532 17,448 26.62<br />
Hamirpur 83,505 20,179 24.16<br />
Mandi 1,69,863 42,012 24.73<br />
Shimla 94,316 21,755 33.67<br />
Sirmaur 58,618 13,418 22.89<br />
Solan 65,418 17,951 27.44<br />
Una 81,014 15,439 19.02<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 91
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
6.7.4. INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION<br />
Infrastructure services such as power, road transport, telecommunication, water and<br />
sanitation, waste-disposal are central to the activities <strong>of</strong> household economy and<br />
production. The adequacy <strong>of</strong> infrastructure is a critical determinant <strong>of</strong> a country’s<br />
capacity in accelerating its growth that is consistent with poverty reduction.<br />
Infrastructure development and poverty are inversely related and good infrastructure<br />
raises productivity and lowers production costs. Major infrastructure failures quickly and<br />
radically reduce community’s quality <strong>of</strong> life, productivity and causes poverty.<br />
Conversely, improved infrastructure services enhance welfare and foster economic<br />
growth. As countries develop, infrastructure must adapt to support changing patterns<br />
<strong>of</strong> demand.<br />
The poor are inherently more vulnerable to inadequate infrastructure settings and<br />
number <strong>of</strong> specific infrastructure problem affects the poor disproportionately. Access<br />
to at least minimal infrastructure services is one <strong>of</strong> the essential elements to attain<br />
welfare. To a great extent the poor can be identified as those who are not able to<br />
consume a basic quantity <strong>of</strong> clean water and who are subject to unsanitary<br />
surroundings, with extremely limited mobility or communication beyond their<br />
immediate settlement. As a result, they have more health problems and fewer<br />
employment opportunities. Different infrastructure sectors have different effect on<br />
improving the quality <strong>of</strong> life and reducing poverty. The thematic links between access<br />
(road and communication) and poverty reduction could be depicted as follows:<br />
• Access to clean water and sanitation - Reduces mortality and morbidity and<br />
increases income-earning activities<br />
• Access to transport and irrigation - Increases non-farm employment<br />
opportunities and reduces regional food price variations<br />
• Construction and maintenance <strong>of</strong> roads and water works - Direct employment<br />
and famine prevention<br />
• Access to power - High productivity and income<br />
The prime virtues to be built in infrastructure building projects are:<br />
• Participation <strong>of</strong> poor in infrastructure building projects;<br />
• Thrust on resources areas where increasing number <strong>of</strong> poor live;<br />
• Exclusively measures to ensure access <strong>of</strong> poor to infrastructure projects;<br />
• Strong institutional arrangements; and<br />
• Emphasis on participation <strong>of</strong> NGOs.<br />
6.7.5. INFRASTRUCTURE AND POVERTY INCIDENCE IN INDIA<br />
The mushroom population growth, limited resources and pursuance <strong>of</strong> new economic<br />
policies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Government</strong> have been placing a heavy demand on all kinds <strong>of</strong><br />
infrastructure services. The infrastructure base, which was built earlier, has proved<br />
inadequate. Power generation, railway and road network, ports, telecommunication,<br />
industrial research and development are all found to be inadequate. Over the years<br />
the development experience has thrown up several weak spots in the development<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 92
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
process. Such weak spot is increasing regional disparities both interstate and intra-state.<br />
These disparities will be further accentuated in the current development strategy driven<br />
by market forces and deregulation <strong>of</strong> private sector. One <strong>of</strong> the consequences <strong>of</strong> such<br />
development process is concentration and accentuation <strong>of</strong> poverty. The infrastructure<br />
bottleneck has been aggravating poverty and posing serious impediments in<br />
acceleration <strong>of</strong> economic growth. The country has; therefore, need to invest<br />
substantially in these infrastructure facilities in order to attain equitable and sustainable<br />
development.<br />
Table: 6.14 India’s Infrastructure and Growth Trend<br />
Infrastructure 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />
Paved road (km)<br />
324,758 623,998 759,764<br />
1363,000<br />
(UN/ESCAP)<br />
Electricity production<br />
(million kW/h)<br />
Telephone (number <strong>of</strong><br />
connections)<br />
61,212 119,150 286,045 472,000 (2003)<br />
1,465,000 2,295,530 5,074,734<br />
125,000,000<br />
(2004)<br />
Railway tracks (km)<br />
59,997 61,240 75,333 1,09,221 (2003)<br />
Irrigation land (‘000 ha)<br />
30,440 38,478 45,500 51,500 (2004)<br />
T U R T U R T U R T U R<br />
Access to drinking water<br />
(% population covered) 17 - - 42 77 31 73 86 69 - 90.2 98<br />
Access to sanitation<br />
(% <strong>of</strong> population<br />
covered)<br />
Source: World Development Report, 1994 and other sources<br />
18 - - 7 27 1 14 44 3 - 49.3 9<br />
Eradication <strong>of</strong> poverty is a great challenge for a country like India given its limited<br />
resources and poor infrastructure capabilities. In a drive for development, post<br />
independence India has been striving hard to eliminate famine, poverty and illiteracy.<br />
State intervention, with strategy for poverty eradication and welfare oriented public<br />
expenditure has enabled the country in overcoming the challenge. The poverty line<br />
dropped from around 54% in 1983 to 36% in 1989 to 1990 in rural areas and from 45% to<br />
38% in urban areas. Over the period 1991 to 1997, urban poverty declined but rural<br />
poverty has remained broadly unchanged.<br />
The plan and programmes, however, have not enabled place the country where it is<br />
expected to be. The result is far behind the projected and expected target in reducing<br />
poverty and increasing living standard. Available estimates indicate that India has the<br />
highest poverty rate, in comparison to other countries. Approximately 26% <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />
people live below poverty line (National Human Development Report, 2001). The<br />
absolute number <strong>of</strong> poor has risen over recent decades. Preliminary World Bank<br />
evidence suggests that the number <strong>of</strong> poor has increased from 300 million in 1988-89 to<br />
340 million in 1997.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 93
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
6.7.8. HIMACHAL STATE ROAD PROJECT AND SCOPE FOR POVERTY REDUCTION<br />
The HPSRP as a major infrastructure development project has an intrinsic scope for<br />
poverty reduction. The project is not only meant to serve the road users in a better way<br />
or to provide for income restoration to the affected vulnerable social groups; but also<br />
has a scope for wider poverty reduction in the region. HPSRP is expected to serve the<br />
state as a whole in much larger way.<br />
The main objective is to consult with the rood side communities including the local users<br />
<strong>of</strong> the road transport on the possible outcomes <strong>of</strong> improved transport as realized by<br />
them. The other objectives includes -<br />
• To assess the impact <strong>of</strong> the project on reducing poverty through<br />
employment and economic opportunities, access to welfare services to reduce<br />
the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> the excluded groups and enhance their-participation in the<br />
project.<br />
• For the selected communities, to identify current roles <strong>of</strong> transport in<br />
community life and potential improvements which could be assisted through the<br />
project are Poor, vulnerable and other under-presented and under-privileged<br />
sections among them were specifically targeted.<br />
The scope for poverty reduction is expected to be by way <strong>of</strong>:<br />
6.7.8.1. Employment Opportunities<br />
• Employment to the local population during the construction phase: The<br />
proposed road improvement project is expected to generate a<br />
considerable amount <strong>of</strong> employment in terms <strong>of</strong> requirement <strong>of</strong> both skilled<br />
and unskilled labourers during the road construction. The available local<br />
labourers will be engaged by the contractors, which will be ensured by the<br />
NGOs engaged in the respective contract packages.<br />
• Changes in the labour market in terms <strong>of</strong> new opportunities and wage rates:<br />
The project is expected to bring changes in the labour market in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
new opportunities directly in road construction and indirectly from growth <strong>of</strong><br />
commercialisation, transport sector and establishment <strong>of</strong> amenities like road<br />
side hotels, dhabas and tea stalls etc.<br />
6.7.8.2. Economic Changes<br />
• Increase in current sources <strong>of</strong> income and average household income and<br />
expenditure <strong>of</strong> the project area.<br />
• Increase in current land value and commercial use <strong>of</strong> land in the project<br />
area.<br />
• Change in cropping pattern i.e. introduction <strong>of</strong> cash crops along the project<br />
road.<br />
• Access to farm inputs and raw materials for agriculture and other economic<br />
activities.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 94
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• Access to credit as the improved road infrastructure will boost up the<br />
banking and financial institution in anticipation to the commercial growth <strong>of</strong><br />
the project area.<br />
• Increase in number <strong>of</strong> existing organised, unorganised markets and volume<br />
<strong>of</strong> produce market.<br />
• Linkages to local and regional markets in the project area.<br />
6.7.8.3. Access to Social and Welfare Services<br />
• Increase in literacy level, availability <strong>of</strong> schools, assess to schools, increase in<br />
number <strong>of</strong> schools going children (particularly girls), decrease in drop out<br />
rates, and availability <strong>of</strong> teachers especially in government schools.<br />
• Access to health facilities such as Primary Health Centres, Anganwadi, and<br />
health programmes.<br />
• Availability <strong>of</strong> transport services, availability <strong>of</strong> bus stops, low cost <strong>of</strong> transport,<br />
saving travel time, decrease in occurrence <strong>of</strong> road accidents and difficulties<br />
faced.<br />
• Access to government’s development programs and other services in the<br />
project area.<br />
6.7.8.4. Housing condition<br />
• Housing conditions<br />
• Electrification <strong>of</strong> individual houses<br />
• Tap connection in houses<br />
6.7.8.5. Common Infrastructure/resources<br />
Availability <strong>of</strong> infrastructure - drinking water, Hand pump etc.<br />
6.7.9. METHODOLOGY<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Roads <strong>Project</strong> would be covering 234km <strong>of</strong> roads for upgradation.<br />
This report has focused on the impacted people in different stretches (three<br />
roads) covering all the villages along side the roads from where people have been<br />
affected in different degrees. Besides, the villages covered under the study to identify<br />
the perceived adverse effects <strong>of</strong> the projects by the community, all those PAFs present<br />
in the village at the time <strong>of</strong> study have been covered in-depth and those who were<br />
not present during the study & could not be covered for detailed socio-economic<br />
information, their extent <strong>of</strong> loss have been recorded verifying the same from their next<br />
door neighbour or from their kin members. Such information besides assessing the<br />
benefits to the local population from the improved transport facilities will help to gauge<br />
the perceptions <strong>of</strong> the people with regard to road improvement and its impact on their<br />
living conditions. Survey Included mapping <strong>of</strong> the village and focus group discussions.<br />
Apart from this, secondary data was also collected from various sources.<br />
6.7.10. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The analysis table given below reveals that out <strong>of</strong> a total number <strong>of</strong> 4346 <strong>Project</strong><br />
Affected families covered for the base line socio-economic survey, about 10.19<br />
percent are found to be below the Poverty line. This indicates that in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 95
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
economy, the <strong>Project</strong> Affected Households are in a better condition and by and large<br />
do not fall under the vulnerable category.<br />
Table: 6.15: No. <strong>of</strong> BPL families among the affected families<br />
Corridor name Affected Families BPL families<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 507 67<br />
Una – Nerchowk 3022 273<br />
Theog - Rohru 817 103<br />
Total 4346 443<br />
6.7.10.1. Economic Changes<br />
• Current Employment Pattern / Opportunities<br />
Work participation rate (WPR) is an important indicator <strong>of</strong> development showing<br />
the proportion <strong>of</strong> the working population in an economy. An analysis <strong>of</strong> the WPR<br />
at the district level based on the census data indicates that the district <strong>of</strong> Lahaul<br />
and Spiti has the highest WPR both for males (68.39%) and females (57.43%) in<br />
2001.On the other hand, Kangra district has the lowest male and female WPR.<br />
The total work participation rate has increased during 1991-2000 in all districts <strong>of</strong><br />
the state except Lahaul and Spiti. The total WPR in the state as a whole has<br />
increased from 42.80 per cent in 1991 to 49.28 per cent in 2001. However, a look<br />
at the gender level WPR indicates that the female WPR has substantially<br />
increased during this period. Both male and female WPRs have increased in all<br />
districts <strong>of</strong> the state except Lahaul and Spiti. The increase in female WPR is<br />
encouraging. However, there has been a significant increase in the proportion<br />
<strong>of</strong> female marginal workers during the decade. Among Indian states and union<br />
territories, <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> ranked third, 12th, and second respectively during<br />
2001 in terms <strong>of</strong> the total, male and female work participation rates.<br />
The work participation rate <strong>of</strong> main workers, especially males, declined during<br />
1991-2001. On the other hand, the work participation rate <strong>of</strong> marginal workers<br />
increased. Male marginal workers increased from 1.56 per cent to 11.40 per<br />
cent, and female workers from 15.45 per cent to 22.61 per cent during this<br />
period (Director <strong>of</strong> Census, HP 2002). This indicates a deteriorating quality <strong>of</strong><br />
employment in the state. The growth <strong>of</strong> main workers declined during the<br />
decadal census period. On the other hand, the growth rate <strong>of</strong> marginal workers<br />
increased.<br />
The NSSO survey defines educated persons as those who have attained the<br />
educational level <strong>of</strong> secondary and above. During 1999-2000, unemployment<br />
rate among the educated in the state was much higher for females in both rural<br />
and urban areas, despite a substantial decline during 1993-94 to 1999-2000. The<br />
unemployment rate <strong>of</strong> educated rural males has increased by one per cent on<br />
different approaches over this period. Among urban males, the unemployment<br />
rate has declined by one per cent on the different measures. A comparison with<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 96
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
total unemployment rates indicates relatively higher rates for the educated in<br />
the state. A high literacy rate in the state and the lack <strong>of</strong> generation <strong>of</strong><br />
appropriate employment opportunities for the educated might explain such a<br />
situation.<br />
The growth rate <strong>of</strong> the labour force in the state during the period 1993-94 to<br />
1999-00 has been 0.54 per cent while that <strong>of</strong> the workforce has been 0.37 per<br />
cent during this period. The growth <strong>of</strong> unemployed persons during the same<br />
period has been 8.50 per cent. The growth rates <strong>of</strong> population, labour force and<br />
workforce are relatively much higher in the urban areas than in the rural areas.<br />
Similarly, the rate <strong>of</strong> unemployment in the urban areas was much higher at 7.77<br />
per cent during 1999-00 than in the rural areas at 2.41 per cent. The growth rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> unemployed persons in the urban areas at 18.77 per cent is higher than in the<br />
rural areas. Lack <strong>of</strong> employment avenues in the rural areas and excessive<br />
migration to the urban areas in search <strong>of</strong> employment aggravate the<br />
unemployment situation in the latter. However, according to National Sample<br />
Survey data, the extent <strong>of</strong> unemployment in the state is not large.<br />
According to their live registers, the total number <strong>of</strong> registered job-seekers, both<br />
educated and uneducated, was 9.01 lakh during 2002-03. The number <strong>of</strong><br />
applicants on the live registers has considerably increased over the period. Of<br />
the total job seekers during 2002-03, 66.2 per cent were matriculates and<br />
undergraduates, 20.7 per cent under-matriculates, 8.9 per cent graduates and<br />
3.3 per cent postgraduates.<br />
The proportion <strong>of</strong> males in the agricultural sector has gradually declined. Over<br />
the years, there has been a significant increase in the proportion <strong>of</strong> males<br />
engaged in construction, trade, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and<br />
communication services in the rural areas <strong>of</strong> the state. In the urban areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />
state, trade, hotels and restaurants employed about 25 per cent <strong>of</strong> the male<br />
workers, while the manufacturing and construction sectors accounted for 10 per<br />
cent and 12 per cent respectively <strong>of</strong> the usually employed males<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 3.13 lakh employees in the organised sector in 2001, about 84.6 per cent<br />
were employed in the public sector and 15.4 per cent in the private sector. The<br />
Employment in the organized private sector at the industry level has been the<br />
highest in manufacturing (69.3%) followed by community, social and personnel<br />
services (14.5%) and construction (10.2%), accounting for 94 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
employment in the private sector.<br />
• Average Household Income, Expenditure and Sources <strong>of</strong> Income<br />
The average annual household Income varies from Rs 0.43 lakh to 1.35 Lakh for<br />
the project routes whereas the average annual household expenditure ranges<br />
between Rs 0.30 lakh to 0.82 lakh for the project routes. Though like any rural<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 97
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
area, agriculture remains the major source <strong>of</strong> income for most <strong>of</strong> the inhabitants<br />
along the road, trade and business was found to be major source <strong>of</strong> income.<br />
Contribution <strong>of</strong> labour activities (both agriculture and non-agriculture) was not<br />
as significant as compared to other part <strong>of</strong> the country. It is perceived that with<br />
better connectivity and increased sources <strong>of</strong> income, average household<br />
income <strong>of</strong> people living along and close to the highways will go up.<br />
• Current land use pattern and the land market/prices<br />
Land is a scarce commodity in <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong>. The current land use along<br />
the road is <strong>of</strong> mix nature. For a good part <strong>of</strong> the road length, the land along the<br />
road belongs to government or forest. In Mehatpur-Amb corridor the land use<br />
along the road is some what continuous development with sporadic open<br />
space. The current land price is on higher side and Discussion with the villagers<br />
revealed that with the improved road network more and more opportunities will<br />
open up by way <strong>of</strong> industrialization. The state has lot to <strong>of</strong>fer in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
horticulture, fruits and vegetable and the improved network will facilitate in<br />
faster movement <strong>of</strong> horticulture, fruit and vegetable produce which are<br />
generally perishable in nature. Thus reducing the damage factor to the goods<br />
and increasing the value <strong>of</strong> the produce. It is expected that, with the upgradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> highways, land price along the highways will move upward and this<br />
certainly will bring in change in the land use. Agriculture land along the<br />
highways will be converted into commercial blocks mainly in Mehatput-Amb<br />
and Una-Nerchowk road.<br />
• Over view <strong>of</strong> the Economy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong><br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> achieved an annual average growth rate <strong>of</strong> 1.6% in the first<br />
Five Year Plan period 1951-56. After Second Five Year Plan 1956-61 onwards and<br />
up to Fifth Five Year Plan period 1974-78, the State achieved a growth rate <strong>of</strong><br />
about 3 to 4 percent. During the two annual plans <strong>of</strong> 1978-79 and 1979-80, the<br />
economy registered a negative growth rate <strong>of</strong> (-)3.6 percent but again showed<br />
a recovery during Sixth Plan period 1980-85. During Seventh Plan period 1985-90,<br />
State achieved all time high growth rate <strong>of</strong> 8.8%. During Eighth Five Year Plan<br />
period (1992-97), an annual average growth rate <strong>of</strong> 6.3 percent was achieved<br />
against the envisaged target <strong>of</strong> 6 percent for the State economy. During the<br />
Ninth Five Year Plan (1997-2002), the state economy achieved an average<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> 7.1% and the national economy registered a growth <strong>of</strong> 5.4%. The State<br />
income <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> during 1993-94 to 2001-02 period increased<br />
from Rs. 4250.03 crore to Rs. 7379.73 crore at constant prices (1993-94) and to Rs.<br />
13212.00 crore at current prices.<br />
The Primary Sector contributed 71.01 % <strong>of</strong> the SDP in 1950-51 which declined to<br />
26.50% in 2001-02. The contribution <strong>of</strong> secondary and tertiary sectors has<br />
increased year after year. In 1950-51, the secondary sector contribution to SDP<br />
was 9.5%, which went up to 32.05% in the year 2001-02. Similarly, the tertiary<br />
sector contribution to State Domestic Product in 1950-51 was 19.49% which went<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 98
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
up to 41.45% in 2001-02. This structural shift from Primary to Secondary and<br />
Tertiary Sectors is a healthy sign <strong>of</strong> growing economy.<br />
The per capita income at constant prices (1993-94) increased from Rs. 7870 in<br />
1993-94 to Rs. 11936 in 2001-02 while at current prices; it rose to Rs. 21368 during<br />
the same period. The movement <strong>of</strong> per capita income at current prices at the<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> each Five Year Plan period vis-à-vis all India level is given in chart<br />
below.<br />
6.7.10.2. Access to Social / Welfare Services<br />
• Literacy Status<br />
Educational attainments vary from district to district in the State from 63.73<br />
percent in Chamba district to 83.16 percent in Hamirpur. <strong>Himachal</strong> has registered<br />
a literacy rate <strong>of</strong> 77.13 percent (Census 2001) which is higher than all India<br />
average rates <strong>of</strong> 65.38 percent. It has an all India rank <strong>of</strong> 11 on the literacy scale<br />
among Indian states ad Union territories.<br />
There has been a substantial increase in the number <strong>of</strong> schools set up both at the<br />
primary and middle levels. The increase in number <strong>of</strong> primary school from 3768 in<br />
1970 to 10634 in 2000, an increase <strong>of</strong> about 182 percent. Similarly, at middle<br />
school level, there has been an increase <strong>of</strong> 130 percent during 1970 to 2000. The<br />
increase in number <strong>of</strong> high school in the same period witnessed a growth <strong>of</strong> 321<br />
percent over 1970 figure. This reveals the emphasis the government has placed on<br />
basic education.<br />
The state has almost achieved the prescribed norms <strong>of</strong> having a primary school<br />
within a distance <strong>of</strong> one kilometer even in districts barring with scattered<br />
settlement pattern. The average distance in the state for primary school is 1.29<br />
kilometer and 2.36 kilometer for middle school. In the case <strong>of</strong> middle school the<br />
national norm is three kilometer and the sate average is way below it. In case <strong>of</strong><br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 99
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
primary except hilly districts all other districts distance is well within one kilometre<br />
norm.<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> has a much higher rate <strong>of</strong> enrolment rate than the national average<br />
and neighbouring states like Punjab and Haryana. The percentage <strong>of</strong> enrolment<br />
in the age group <strong>of</strong> 6-11 and 11-14 in 2002 was 95.77 and 86.18 percent<br />
respectively. The state has thus nearly achieved universalisation <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
education in terms <strong>of</strong> enrolment and accessibility. Similarly <strong>Himachal</strong> has reduced<br />
drop out rate drastically and achieved retention rate <strong>of</strong> 99 percent in primary<br />
level<br />
The teacher pupil ratio at all level in educational institutions is fairly adequate, but<br />
regional variations exist. The all India average <strong>of</strong> teacher pupil ratio for primary,<br />
upper primary and secondary is at 42, 37 and 29 respectively. The same for<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> is 30, 18 and 30 respectively. In the state there are a total <strong>of</strong><br />
24794 teachers in primary school, 5974 number teachers in upper primary and<br />
10513 number teachers are in high school. In addition to this the state has 64<br />
collages for general education, three degree level engineering collages, seven<br />
diploma level polytechnics and 52 Industrial Training Institutions.<br />
• Health facility<br />
It is well known that <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong>, like most other states, has made significant<br />
progress in bringing down the crude death rate (CDR), infant mortality rate (IMR),<br />
and in raising the standard <strong>of</strong> living and expectancy <strong>of</strong> life at birth. This is also true<br />
<strong>of</strong> the control <strong>of</strong> different communicable and non- communicable diseases, such<br />
as diphtheria, poliomyelitis, tetanus (both neonatal and others), whooping cough,<br />
measles, leprosy, malaria, goitre, blindness, etc. The state has a number <strong>of</strong><br />
medical, public health and Ayurvedic institutions. The state has number <strong>of</strong> health<br />
facilities and the list is given below in able 6.16.<br />
Table 6.16: Health Facility in the state<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Hospitals<br />
No.<br />
General hospitals (GHs) 50<br />
Community health centres (CHCs) 66<br />
Primary health centres (PHCs) 441<br />
Civil dispensaries (CDs) 21<br />
Sub-centres 2067<br />
Tuberculosis Institutions<br />
Hospitals 2<br />
District TB clinics/centres 12<br />
TB sub-clinics 7<br />
Leprosy Institutions<br />
Hospitals/wards 6<br />
District nucleus 12<br />
State survey assessment units (SSAU) 1<br />
Leprosy training centers 6<br />
STD Institutions<br />
Clinics/sub-clinics 26<br />
Units 45<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 100
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Indian System <strong>of</strong> Medicines and Homoeopathy (ISM&H)<br />
Ayurvedic college 1<br />
Ayurvedic hospitals 23<br />
Ayurvedic dispensaries 1112<br />
Unani dispensaries 3<br />
Homoeopathic dispensaries 14<br />
Nature cure unit 1<br />
Ayurvedic pharmacy 2<br />
Ayurvedic research institute 1<br />
Panchkarma centres 2<br />
10. Amchi clinics 4<br />
Other Clinics and Centres<br />
Dental clinics 108<br />
X-ray clinics 142<br />
Eye-ENT clinics 11<br />
Maternal and child welfare (M&CW) centres 46<br />
As on 31 March 2003, the total number <strong>of</strong> beds available under the modern<br />
system <strong>of</strong> medicine is 8,872. Of these, 5,558 beds are in general hospitals, 1,202 in<br />
CHCs, and 966 in PHC grade-2 and 124 in PHC grade-1. In addition, 35 beds are<br />
reserved for cancer, 751 for tuberculosis, 232 for leprosy, four for sexually<br />
transmitted diseases. The staff position (as on 31 March 2003) shows that 21 per<br />
cent <strong>of</strong> its sanctioned 16,743 posts, are vacant. The major vacancies among the<br />
medical staff include doctors (9%), nursing superintendents (55%), staff nurses<br />
(28%), public health nurses (30%), ANMs designated as staff nurse (21%), female<br />
health workers (18%), dais (35%), pharmacists (13%), male health workers (28%),<br />
health supervisors (20%) and health educators (28%).<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> is the only state in this region to have started a community<br />
financial management programme. It has set up hospital welfare societies at<br />
zonal/district hospitals to collect user charges and utilize these for fulfilling the<br />
needs <strong>of</strong> these hospitals. By 2001-2002, these were set up in all the 12 zonal/district<br />
hospitals and 21 sub-divisional hospitals. Since these committees were fixing user<br />
charges for diagnostic and other services differently in different parts <strong>of</strong> the state,<br />
there was resentment among the population. As a result, the state government<br />
recently changed the name <strong>of</strong> these committees to Hospital Welfare Societies<br />
and rationalised the user charges.<br />
• Access to Transport Facility<br />
Eight national highways (NH) pass through the state with a total length <strong>of</strong> 1237 km.<br />
NH 1-A touches Shahpur. NH 20 passes through Pathankot, Chakki, Dharamsala,<br />
Nurpur and Mandi. NH 21 connects Chandigarh with Manali through Mandi. NH 22<br />
connects Ambala with Kaurik through Kalka, Simla and Wangtoo. NH 70 passes<br />
through Mubarakpur, Amb, Nadaun and Hamirpur. NH 21-A begins at Pinjore in<br />
Haryana, passes through Nalagarh and reaches Swarghat, where it connects with<br />
NH 21. NH 88 connects Shimla with Kangra through Hamirpur and Nadaun. NH 72<br />
begins at Ambala and passes through Amb and Paunta Sahib in <strong>Himachal</strong> before<br />
terminating at Haridwar in Uttarnchal.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 101
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
As per the latest statistics available the total length <strong>of</strong> roads comprising <strong>of</strong> national<br />
highways, state highways, district roads and rural roads is 44809.70 kms. Of the<br />
total road length, about 97% (24922 km) is motorable road. About 57% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
motorable road is metalled. The single lane road constitutes about 90% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
motorable roads, indicating the need for widening the roads, in particular the<br />
national and state highways. Transport facility will improve with the up-gradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> highway from safety, saving <strong>of</strong> travelling time point <strong>of</strong> view.<br />
• Occurrence <strong>of</strong> Accidents<br />
Accidents seem to be quite common on project roads, primarily involving heavy<br />
vehicles. Accidents involving non-motorized vehicles or pedestrians were also<br />
reported by villagers and police, which generally occur during night, or while<br />
crossing the rood. Discussion with police personnel revealed that most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
accidents go un-recorded especially if only damage occurs to the vehicle as<br />
parties involved go for out <strong>of</strong> court mutual settlement. Mostly first Information<br />
report is lodged only if accident is fatal. Improved highways will not only bring in<br />
more number <strong>of</strong> vehicles, even the speed <strong>of</strong> the vehicles will increase and that<br />
may result in more number <strong>of</strong> accidents. However in design safety measures have<br />
been provided.<br />
• Access to government’s development programs and other services<br />
<strong>Government</strong>'s poverty alleviation programmes have been implemented in all the<br />
villages surveyed. Some <strong>of</strong> common programmes are Swarnajayanti Grama<br />
Swaozgar Yojana (SGSY), Sampoorna Gramin Rozgar Yojana (SGRY), National<br />
Food for work Programme (NFWP), Swarna Jayanti Shahari Rojgar Yojana (SJSRY)<br />
etc have been implemented and beneficiaries were available at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
discussion and the government's programmes are accessible for villagers as per<br />
the norms.<br />
• Housing Condition<br />
Nearly 86% <strong>of</strong> the houses surveyed are found to be permanent or semi permanent<br />
i.e., brick walls with RCC / tin/asbestos ro<strong>of</strong>s. All the households have found to be<br />
power connection and majority have tap water point.<br />
• Common Infrastructure / Resources<br />
Among the other common Infrastructures, drinking water facilities, hand pumps,<br />
were found in every village surveyed. Impacted common resources shall be<br />
replaced by the project before dismantling the existing ones. The replace <strong>of</strong><br />
common resources will have better design, construction quality and peoples<br />
participation, thus improving the over all acceptability <strong>of</strong> the reconstruction work<br />
by the people.<br />
6.7. 11. PROBABLE IMPACTS OF IMPROVED ROAD NETWORK<br />
The proposed road project is expected to bring in economic and social changes,<br />
which in turn will bring rural prosperity. The possible positive impacts are listed below.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 102
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• Increased Employment Opportunities<br />
The immediate benefits <strong>of</strong> road construction and improvement will come in the<br />
form <strong>of</strong> employment opportunities for the roadside communities and specially<br />
those who are engaged as wage labourers, petty contractors and suppliers <strong>of</strong><br />
raw materials. It is expected that during the construction phase, number <strong>of</strong><br />
employment opportunities will be available namely, labour force (policy clearly<br />
indicates that preference be given to local population in selection <strong>of</strong> labourers),<br />
helping hands, gardeners in contractors’ <strong>of</strong>fice, drivers, etc. Similarly with colony<br />
<strong>of</strong> construction workers and contractor coming up petty business like tea and<br />
food stalls, barbershop, beetle shop, grocery, milk vending, etc will be in demand.<br />
• Increased Market Opportunities<br />
It is further expected that wage rates in the area would improve; as a result<br />
purchasing power will also increase. Improved road networks provide for<br />
improved linkages between the village communities and urban centres, which<br />
provides wider marketing facilities. People will have wider options in buying and<br />
selling their commodities. Small and petty village traders may tap the bigger<br />
markets, transport the produces fast and get more pr<strong>of</strong>it margins instead <strong>of</strong><br />
depending solely on local markets and the middleman. Speedy and efficient<br />
transportation will help in saving time and reduce the wastage, particularly in<br />
case <strong>of</strong> agricultural produces, vegetables and milk etc. and will also save enough<br />
time for other works back home.<br />
• Increased Mobility <strong>of</strong> Human Resources<br />
Road networks not only links the village communities to better markets, but also<br />
opens up wider work opportunities in distant places. People can shuttle to distant<br />
work sites and towns and engage in construction, factories, business as well as<br />
domestic works. People get regular works with higher wages without migrating<br />
permanently or seasonally if the transportation is efficient.<br />
• Increased Local Economics and Credit Opportunities<br />
An improved road network encourages urban entrepreneurs to invest in far and<br />
remote areas in commercial farming and industrial activities. Villagers may lease<br />
out their lands and houses for higher prices make new business partner and this<br />
develops their entrepreneurship skills. With more money flowing to the villages,<br />
there will be more work opportunities. People get opportunities to open up tea<br />
stall, hotels, garage and rest house and so on which in turn generate additional<br />
employment in terms <strong>of</strong> helping hands. With the improved networking and cash<br />
management, the villagers can tap new institutional credit institute and financial<br />
services.<br />
• Increased Institutional Networks<br />
Improved roads also help people building strong institutional network with outside agencies.<br />
They can put forward their grievances and meet them quickly from the government and non-<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 103
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
government sectors. Frequency <strong>of</strong> interaction will increase among people and out side<br />
agencies thereby paying more attention to their problems in the village.<br />
Prosperity through Road Network Development<br />
Road Network<br />
Connectivity/Facilita<br />
tes Communication<br />
Direct Impacts<br />
Indirect Impacts<br />
1. Employment Opportunities<br />
2. Less freight and passenger<br />
travelling time and cost<br />
3. Increased accessibility<br />
4. Increased comfort and<br />
safety<br />
5. Improved access to urban<br />
and industrial consumption<br />
centres<br />
6. Improved road side<br />
environment<br />
1. Increased business opportunities<br />
and direct employment<br />
2. Enhanced competitiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
tradable sector<br />
3. Better integration <strong>of</strong> market<br />
4. Better health, sanitation,<br />
education and other civic<br />
amenities<br />
5. Increased mobility <strong>of</strong> populace<br />
6. Less tension and anxiety<br />
7. Increased agricultural and industrial<br />
productivity<br />
The villages will be under constant vigil by the higher government <strong>of</strong>ficials, politicians,<br />
development agents that helps in regular and efficient maintenance <strong>of</strong> village school, health<br />
centres, electricity, irrigation, drinking waters, veterinary and other development schemes.<br />
Essential and emergency services can be availed fast like schools, health centres, public<br />
distribution system etc. In addition to this road expansion will promote prosperity among the<br />
people, which is shown in Figure 6.1 above.<br />
• Increased Awareness Level<br />
Increased frequency <strong>of</strong> interaction with outsiders will increase the awareness level<br />
<strong>of</strong> the people in the village with regard to their health and nutrition, living style,<br />
value <strong>of</strong> education and proper utilisation <strong>of</strong> available resources. With the<br />
increasing emphasis on participatory development and democratisation, people<br />
become more aware <strong>of</strong> their duties and responsibilities and will develop more<br />
bargaining power.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 104
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• Increased Scope for Better Management <strong>of</strong> Public Schemes<br />
Interaction with the government, non-government and other development<br />
agents, help people gain new knowledge on improved farming, land<br />
development, development and maintenance <strong>of</strong> natural resources through the<br />
formation <strong>of</strong> various economic and social development committees. Recently<br />
implemented development schemes like forest management committees,<br />
watershed committees, health and education committees, farmers association<br />
etc can work better with the easy, efficient transportation that connects<br />
progressively the people and the development agents.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 105
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 7 - COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION<br />
7.1. Introduction<br />
Participation is a process, through which stakeholder influence and share control over<br />
development initiatives and the decisions and the resources, which affects them. The<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> R&R programme is<br />
directly related to the degree <strong>of</strong><br />
continuing involvement <strong>of</strong> those affected<br />
by the project. Through public<br />
participation, stakeholders and key social<br />
issues were identified and strategy was<br />
formulated for sustainable and equitable<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> project benefits among the<br />
project beneficiaries with specific<br />
reference to project affected and<br />
vulnerable group. Thus a comprehensive<br />
planning is required to assure that local<br />
government, NGOs, host population and<br />
project staff interacts regularly, frequently<br />
and purposefully throughout all stages <strong>of</strong><br />
the project. Participation <strong>of</strong> persons directly<br />
affected by projects is a primary<br />
requirement in development <strong>of</strong> R&R, if its<br />
programmes are to be suited to the needs<br />
<strong>of</strong> the resettled population. Their involvement<br />
vastly increases the probability <strong>of</strong> successful<br />
resettlement and rehabilitation. To ensure<br />
peoples’ participation in the planning phase<br />
<strong>of</strong> this project and to treat public<br />
consultation and participation as a<br />
continuous two way process, numerous<br />
events were arranged at all stages <strong>of</strong> project<br />
preparation. It as aimed at promotion <strong>of</strong><br />
public understanding and fruitful solutions <strong>of</strong><br />
developmental problems such as local needs <strong>of</strong> road users and problem and<br />
prospects <strong>of</strong> resettlement, various sections <strong>of</strong> PAPs and other stakeholders were<br />
consulted through focus group discussions and individual interviews. The option <strong>of</strong><br />
alternative design was also discussed to meet their local transport needs, minimization<br />
<strong>of</strong> impacts and to achieve speedy implementation <strong>of</strong> the project with people’s<br />
involvement.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 106
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
7.2. Consultation and Participation Mechanisms<br />
Experience indicates that involuntary resettlement generally causes numerous<br />
problems for the affected population. These problems may be reduced to a great<br />
extent if people are properly Informed and<br />
consulted about the project and allowed to<br />
make meaningful choices or preferences. This<br />
serves to reduce the insecurity and opposition<br />
to the project which otherwise are likely to<br />
occur in due course <strong>of</strong> project<br />
implementation. The objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
consultation program were to minimize<br />
negative impact in the project corridors and<br />
to make people aware <strong>of</strong> the road<br />
rehabilitation project. During the process, efforts were made to ascertain the views and<br />
preferences <strong>of</strong> the people. The aims <strong>of</strong> community consultation were:<br />
• To understand views <strong>of</strong> the people affected by the impacts <strong>of</strong> the road<br />
improvement<br />
• To identify and assess all major economic and sociological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />
village to enable effective planning and implementation and<br />
• To resolve the issues relating to affect on community property<br />
7.3. Levels <strong>of</strong> Consultations<br />
The project has ensure that the affected population and other stakeholders are<br />
informed, consulted, and allowed to<br />
participate actively in the development<br />
process. This is done during preparation<br />
and will continue during implementation,<br />
and monitoring <strong>of</strong> project results and<br />
impacts. During implementation and<br />
monitoring stage information will be<br />
disseminated to project affected persons<br />
and other key stakeholders in appropriate<br />
ways. This information will be prepared in<br />
local language as required, describing the<br />
main project features including the<br />
entitlement framework. Consultation has<br />
been carried out in ways appropriate for<br />
local condition such as keeping in view<br />
the cultural issues, gender issue, and<br />
other differences among the<br />
stakeholders. Where groups or individuals<br />
have different views/opinions, particular<br />
emphasis has been given on the views<br />
and needs <strong>of</strong> the vulnerable groups. The<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 107
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Resettlement Action Plan provides detailed information regarding the consultation<br />
process. The consultation process established during preparation stage <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
uses different types <strong>of</strong> consultation such as In-depth Interviews with key informants,<br />
focus group discussions, Workshops, Seminars and meetings. The consultation process<br />
included the following:<br />
• Heads <strong>of</strong> households likely to be impacted;<br />
• Household members;<br />
• Clusters <strong>of</strong> PAPs:<br />
• Villagers;<br />
• Village Panchayats<br />
• Local voluntary organizations; and Community based organization or Non<br />
<strong>Government</strong>al Organization;<br />
• <strong>Government</strong> Agencies and Departments, and<br />
• Major project stakeholders, such as women, road user groups, health<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, and others.<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> the consultation process, women were given the opportunity to voice their<br />
views. A State level workshop was conducted with participation from key stakeholders<br />
including local NGOs, academic<br />
institutions, government <strong>of</strong>ficials, and<br />
others. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the stakeholder<br />
workshop was to present and discuss the<br />
framework and approach to social<br />
impacts and resettlement, and to achieve<br />
agreement about implementation<br />
mechanisms and coordination among<br />
different groups and agencies.<br />
7.4. Methods <strong>of</strong> Public Consultation<br />
Public consultations in the project area were held at village, Tehsil and District level. The<br />
following methodology has been adopted for carrying out public consultations in this<br />
project:<br />
• Disseminating information and requesting villagers to attend the public<br />
consultation meetings<br />
• Sharing the opinions and preferences <strong>of</strong> the PAPs<br />
• Involving the PAPs in decisionmaking<br />
including RAP<br />
implementation<br />
Different techniques <strong>of</strong> consultation with<br />
stakeholders were used during project<br />
preparation, viz., in-depth interviews,<br />
public meetings, group discussions etc. to<br />
understand the socio-economic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />
the community and the affected families,<br />
questionnaires were designed and<br />
information was collected from the individuals on one-to-one basis. The consultations<br />
have also been carried out with special emphasis on the vulnerable groups. The key<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 108
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
informants during the project preparation phase included both individuals and groups<br />
namely:<br />
• Heads and members <strong>of</strong> households likely to be affected<br />
• Groups/clusters <strong>of</strong> PAPs<br />
• Village Panchayats: Sarpanch and<br />
members<br />
• Local voluntary organizations and<br />
NGOs<br />
• <strong>Government</strong> agencies and<br />
departments<br />
• Other project stakeholders with<br />
special focus on PAPs belonging to<br />
the vulnerable group<br />
7.5. Consultation Prior to<br />
Resettlement<br />
Preliminary discussions were conducted<br />
by the consultant through Group<br />
Discussions (GDs) and mass meetings<br />
with the PAPs as well as the general<br />
public in the villages and towns.<br />
Methods used for local level<br />
consultations were:<br />
• Individual household level<br />
consultation as part <strong>of</strong> census<br />
and socio-economic survey<br />
• Formal public consultations involving all sections <strong>of</strong> the society at strategic<br />
locations, which included group discussions with shopkeepers/traders, squatters,<br />
residential affected persons, land affected persons etc.<br />
• Focus group discussion<br />
7.5.1. INDIVIDUAL LEVEL CONSULTATION<br />
At the village level, PAPs and local<br />
people’s representatives were<br />
consulted. During the consultations,<br />
efforts were made to:<br />
• Understand the views <strong>of</strong> the<br />
people affected, with<br />
reference to acquisition <strong>of</strong> land<br />
and selection <strong>of</strong> realignment<br />
section and alignments for the<br />
bypasses<br />
• Understand views <strong>of</strong> people on<br />
resettlement options and rehabilitation, R&R issues and land acquisition<br />
• Identify and assess major economic and sociological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />
villages to enable effective planning and implementation<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 109
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• Resolve issues related to impacts on<br />
community property and their<br />
relocation<br />
• Examine PAPs’ opinions on road safety<br />
issues and selection <strong>of</strong> locations for<br />
pedestrian crossings, underpasses /<br />
overpasses<br />
• Identify people's expectations<br />
regarding public conveniences and<br />
roadside amenities such as rain shelter,<br />
drain<br />
• Perception <strong>of</strong> the community on<br />
environmental issues/environmental enhancements and highway related<br />
diseases<br />
• Identify levels and extent <strong>of</strong> community participation in project implementation<br />
and monitoring<br />
• Finally, to establish an understanding for identification <strong>of</strong> overall developmental<br />
goals and benefits <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
7.5.2. GROUP MEETINGS<br />
Group discussions were conducted<br />
primarily in settlements with problems <strong>of</strong><br />
traffic congestion, multiple intersections<br />
closely located, major road intersections<br />
and with high concentration <strong>of</strong> PAPs.<br />
Public consultations were held with large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> people in villages long the<br />
corridor during the survey and suggestions<br />
and comments <strong>of</strong> PAPs have been<br />
incorporated in the project design as far<br />
as possible keeping in view the technical feasibility. All issues raised during public<br />
consultation have been dealt with and incorporated in relevant chapters.<br />
7.5.3. FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS<br />
Public consultations were conducted for<br />
minimizing adverse social impacts. The<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> these consultations was to<br />
obtain the views and suggestions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
potentially affected persons on the road<br />
design and its potential impacts on them.<br />
The affected persons were consulted as<br />
“focus groups” such as a group <strong>of</strong> affected<br />
residents, a group <strong>of</strong> affected agricultural<br />
families and a group <strong>of</strong> affected shop owners or traders. These are also interest groups<br />
that have very <strong>of</strong>ten come up with good alternative suggestions on the road<br />
alignment that have helped in re-designing them to reduce any adverse impacts on<br />
the people. Public consultations chiefly acted as a forum to inform people about the<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 110
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
project and also to elicit their opinion on the social provisions detailed in the project.<br />
Information dissemination on<br />
resettlement and rehabilitation<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> the project, proposed<br />
road widths and alignments, role <strong>of</strong> the<br />
community, grievance redress etc.,<br />
were given due importance. Issues<br />
pertaining to land acquisition,<br />
compensation, assistances to<br />
vulnerable groups, commercial,<br />
residential titleholders and tenants were<br />
also discussed with the community.<br />
7.6. Key Findings <strong>of</strong> the Consultation<br />
Major findings (arising out <strong>of</strong> the consultations) related to key issues such as general<br />
perception about the project, suggestions to mitigate hardships resulting from<br />
dislocation and loss <strong>of</strong> livelihood, the details <strong>of</strong> which are presented below and the<br />
summary <strong>of</strong> consultation is given in Annexure<br />
VI.<br />
• Many people were not aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project<br />
• People were convinced about the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> good highways in their<br />
region since it will reduce the<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> accidents and enhance<br />
economic opportunities<br />
• People consented to cooperate if<br />
adequate compensation is given<br />
• Most people preferred to resettle near their previous place <strong>of</strong> business and<br />
residence and preferred self-resettlement<br />
• Cultivators preferred cash compensation at market rate. Land for land option<br />
was least preferred<br />
• Requests were made by the<br />
affected people for providing<br />
facilities and amenities like rain<br />
shelter and safer accessibility<br />
at points <strong>of</strong> congestion and<br />
intersections<br />
• On site relocation for small<br />
business enterprise (SBE) within<br />
the RoW at the edges <strong>of</strong> the<br />
carriageway were suggested.<br />
Small Business Enterprisers were<br />
not interested to relocate at<br />
far-<strong>of</strong>f locations. They perceived low business growth at such locations<br />
• Generally people were not opposed to their relocation in nearby places<br />
• PAPs wanted to know when construction work would commence<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 111
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• Affected People asked about creation <strong>of</strong> employment opportunities during<br />
road construction and later phases <strong>of</strong> the project for them<br />
• People suggested that adequate safety measures should be provided such as<br />
speed breaks, signage’s etc. near inhabited areas, school and hospitals<br />
7.7. Continuation <strong>of</strong> Public Consultations<br />
The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the R&R program is directly related to the degree <strong>of</strong> continuing<br />
involvement <strong>of</strong> those affected by the project. During the preparatory stage,<br />
consultations were held at local level, district as well as State level. Several additional<br />
rounds <strong>of</strong> consultations with PAPs` and other stakeholders have been planned in the<br />
action plan through the partner NGO<br />
during RAP implementation.<br />
Consultations during RP<br />
implementation will involve<br />
agreements on compensation,<br />
assistance options, and entitlement<br />
package and income restoration. The<br />
other round <strong>of</strong> consultations will occur<br />
when compensation and assistance<br />
are provided and actual resettlement<br />
begins. Information disclosure is pursued for effective implementation and timely<br />
execution <strong>of</strong> the RAP. For the benefit <strong>of</strong> the community in general and PAPs in<br />
particular, the RAP and R&R policy were translated into local language and made<br />
available to the affected persons and also to the general public for information.<br />
7.8. Plan for Continued Participation<br />
The following, set <strong>of</strong> activities is required for effective implementation <strong>of</strong> RAP. This will<br />
also help in timely execution <strong>of</strong> RAP.<br />
Information Disclosure: For the benefit <strong>of</strong><br />
the community in general and PAPs in<br />
particular, RAP and R&R policy has<br />
been translated in Hindi and kept at<br />
PWD <strong>of</strong>fices in project districts. A copy<br />
<strong>of</strong> RAP and R&R policy will also be<br />
placed at the village panchyat <strong>of</strong>fices,<br />
pubic libraries at district and block level,<br />
deputy commissioner’s <strong>of</strong>fice and World<br />
Bank infor shop.<br />
Public Information Dissemination: PWD<br />
<strong>of</strong>fices located along the three <strong>Project</strong> Corridors will provide actual information and<br />
policies and other rehabilitation action plan to the people in a regular manner. For this,<br />
following steps are proposed:<br />
Community Participation: For effective implementation <strong>of</strong> RAP it is essential to provide<br />
scope for involving communities and PAPs in the process. The mechanism <strong>of</strong> involving<br />
communities is suggested below:<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 112
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• Tehsil Office<br />
• District Magistrate Office<br />
• CMU Office<br />
The CMU <strong>of</strong>fices will provide information on R&R policies and features <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rehabilitation action plan. For continued consultations, the following steps are<br />
envisaged in the project:<br />
• The NGOs involved in the Implementation <strong>of</strong> RAP will organize Public meetings,<br />
and will appraise the communities about the progress in the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
works<br />
• The NGO will organize public meetings to inform the community about the<br />
payment and assistance paid to the community. Regular update <strong>of</strong> the<br />
program <strong>of</strong> resettlement component <strong>of</strong> the project will be placed for public<br />
display at the PWD <strong>of</strong>fice<br />
• There will be Grievance Redress<br />
Committees (GRCs) for each<br />
district. The PAPs will be associated<br />
with such committees (each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
committees will include a<br />
representative <strong>of</strong> the PAPs)<br />
• The resettlement sites, and other<br />
amenities and facilities to be<br />
made available to the PAPs will be<br />
decided in consultation with the<br />
communities<br />
• All monitoring and evaluation reports <strong>of</strong> the R & R components <strong>of</strong> the project will<br />
be disclosed in the same manner as that <strong>of</strong> the RP report suggested above<br />
• Key features <strong>of</strong> the entitlements will be displayed in billboards on the project<br />
corridor in both regional language and also in English for easy access<br />
• Together with the NGO, the CMU will conduct information dissemination sessions<br />
and solicit the help <strong>of</strong> the local community/business leaders to encourage the<br />
participation <strong>of</strong> the PAPs in RAP implementation<br />
• Attempts will be made to ensure that vulnerable groups understand the process<br />
and take their specific needs into account<br />
7.9. Public Disclosure <strong>of</strong> Resettlement Plan<br />
This Resettlement Plan has been disclosed to<br />
the affected persons and other stakeholders<br />
for review and comments on various<br />
mechanisms and entitlement suggested for<br />
the implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP. The intention<br />
<strong>of</strong> this procedure is to receive comments from<br />
the PAPs in particular so as to incorporate the<br />
appropriate suggestions. The translated version<br />
<strong>of</strong> summary RAP including entitlement matrix has been disclosed to the PAPs and their<br />
representatives in regional language. The findings and suggestions from the above<br />
consulted process can be summed up as follows:<br />
• All consulted persons praised the consultation process and generally felt secure<br />
and relieved after knowing the provisions made in the entitlement matrix<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 113
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• The local people’s representatives such as Sarpanch assured to cooperate in<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
• People wanted transparency in disbursement <strong>of</strong> compensation and assistance<br />
to the PAPs<br />
• PAPs wanted a more simplified grievance redress procedure and involvement <strong>of</strong><br />
an honest NGO for the implementation <strong>of</strong> RAP<br />
• The non-availability <strong>of</strong> updated land records especially for newly transferred<br />
land ownerships should be properly verified and updated before the payment<br />
<strong>of</strong> compensation<br />
• They have assured to extend all possible cooperation for shifting and relocating<br />
community property resources<br />
7.10. Information Campaign and Future Plans<br />
PAPs will be invited to the proposed grievance redress system for a quick, inexpensive<br />
and amicable settlement <strong>of</strong> claims. They will<br />
be advised to get their records <strong>of</strong> rights<br />
updated. All possible efforts will be made to<br />
motivate the affected landowners and<br />
structure owners for a voluntary and<br />
amicable settlement <strong>of</strong> their claims outside<br />
the court. Most <strong>of</strong> the issues will be settled out<br />
<strong>of</strong> court as far as possible. Handouts will be<br />
distributed by NGOs among all the affected<br />
persons highlighting the benefits <strong>of</strong> amicable<br />
settlement <strong>of</strong> disputes outside the court. Besides, public announcements will be made<br />
in affected areas at regular intervals. Press notes will be released in local newspapers to<br />
aid publicity.<br />
To sum up, it can be said in brief that during the process <strong>of</strong> planning as well as<br />
socioeconomic base line survey, wide range <strong>of</strong> consultations has been done among<br />
the affected persons as well as with all kinds <strong>of</strong> stakeholders. However, it is extremely<br />
essential to continue the process <strong>of</strong> consultation throughout the project cycle with the<br />
affected persons and the key stakeholders for successful resettlement and<br />
rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> the PAPs.<br />
Table 7.1: Mechanism for Participation<br />
<strong>Project</strong><br />
Stage<br />
Planning<br />
PAPs NGOs Host<br />
• Participate in public<br />
meetings<br />
• Identify alternatives to<br />
avoid or minimize<br />
displacement<br />
• Assist in developing<br />
and choosing<br />
alternative options for<br />
relocation and income<br />
generation<br />
• Help to choose<br />
resettlement sites<br />
• Participate in survey<br />
• Provide inputs to<br />
• Assist in impact<br />
assessment<br />
• Assist in census and<br />
SE survey<br />
• Participate in<br />
coordination<br />
committee<br />
• Participate in group<br />
meetings<br />
• Design and<br />
implement<br />
information<br />
campaigns<br />
• Support group<br />
• Provide information<br />
on various aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
host communities<br />
• Assist in data<br />
collection and<br />
design<br />
• Provide inputs to site<br />
selection<br />
• Identify possible<br />
conflict areas with<br />
PAPs<br />
• Identify social and<br />
cultural facilities<br />
needed at<br />
<strong>Project</strong> and local<br />
Officials<br />
• Provide information<br />
on AP skills etc.<br />
• Suggest ways to<br />
minimize impacts<br />
• Indicate local staff<br />
and budget<br />
capacity for<br />
relocation<br />
• Assist NGO in<br />
information<br />
dissemination<br />
• Participate in<br />
consultations<br />
• Examine the<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 114
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>Project</strong><br />
Stage<br />
Implement<br />
ation<br />
M&E<br />
PAPs NGOs Host<br />
entitlement provision<br />
• Assist in preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
action plan<br />
• Suggest mechanism for<br />
grievance redress<br />
• Conflict resolution and<br />
participate in<br />
grievance redress<br />
• Participate in<br />
coordination<br />
committee<br />
• Participate in<br />
implementation<br />
support activities<br />
• Participation in local<br />
decision making<br />
activities<br />
• Decide on<br />
management <strong>of</strong><br />
common properties<br />
• Participate in<br />
grievance redress<br />
mechanism<br />
• Monitor provision <strong>of</strong><br />
entitlements<br />
• Labour and other<br />
inputs at site<br />
• Credit and other<br />
group scheme<br />
management<br />
• O&M <strong>of</strong> sites and<br />
project inputs<br />
• Members <strong>of</strong><br />
implementation<br />
committee<br />
• Participate in<br />
grievance tribunals<br />
• Report to PD on IG<br />
schemes<br />
• Report on service<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> sites<br />
formation, problem<br />
identification and<br />
planning for PAPs<br />
and hosts,<br />
• Suggest mechanism<br />
for grievance redress<br />
<strong>of</strong> conflict resolution<br />
• Assist in preparation<br />
<strong>of</strong> action Plan<br />
• Provide ongoing<br />
information for PAPs<br />
and hosts<br />
• Support in group<br />
management<br />
• Monitor entitlement<br />
provision by<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
IG schemes.<br />
• Training to eligible<br />
PAPs<br />
• Support to<br />
vulnerable groups<br />
• Evaluate community<br />
participation<br />
• Provide advice on<br />
grievance redress<br />
• Provide information<br />
to project staff on<br />
vulnerable groups<br />
• Act as M&E agency<br />
for project<br />
• Act as external<br />
monitors for project<br />
(where not<br />
previously involved)<br />
resettlement sites<br />
• Assist in<br />
identification <strong>of</strong><br />
income generating<br />
(IG) schemes<br />
• Provide inputs for<br />
design <strong>of</strong> IG<br />
schemes<br />
• Help develop a<br />
process <strong>of</strong><br />
consultation<br />
between hosts and<br />
PAPs<br />
• Suggest mechanism<br />
for grievance redress<br />
and conflict<br />
resolution<br />
• Assist APO in<br />
relocation<br />
• Manage common<br />
property at site<br />
• Participate in local<br />
committees<br />
• Assist PAPs in<br />
integration with<br />
hosts.<br />
• Assist PAPs in use <strong>of</strong><br />
new production<br />
system<br />
• Use established<br />
mechanisms for<br />
grievance redress<br />
• Provide inputs to<br />
M&E <strong>of</strong> R&R<br />
<strong>Project</strong> and local<br />
Officials<br />
feasibility <strong>of</strong> IG<br />
discuss with PAPs<br />
• Help<br />
documentation and<br />
consultations.<br />
• Process IG<br />
proposals<br />
• Participate in<br />
grievance redress<br />
• Provide assistance<br />
under local<br />
schemes<br />
• Participate as<br />
member <strong>of</strong><br />
implementation<br />
committee<br />
• Ongoing interaction<br />
with PAPs to identify<br />
problems in IG<br />
programme<br />
• Participant in<br />
correctional<br />
strategies.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 115
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 8 - GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM<br />
8.1. Need for Grievance Redress Mechanism<br />
Though there is a provision for redress <strong>of</strong> grievances <strong>of</strong> PAPs in all aspects relating to<br />
Land Acquisition (LA) and payment <strong>of</strong> compensation in Rehabilitation Action Plan,<br />
various provision under LA act enable aggrieved EPs at different stages <strong>of</strong> LA to<br />
represent their cases to Land Acquisition Officer or even refer to court for redress and<br />
seek higher compensation. The most common reason for delay in implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
projects is grievance <strong>of</strong> people losing land. Considering this, Grievance Redress<br />
Committee (GRC) will be formed much in advance in order to address the grievances<br />
<strong>of</strong> aggrieved persons.<br />
8.2. Grievance Redress Committee<br />
The Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) will be formed at each district comprising <strong>of</strong><br />
following members –<br />
• Dist. Social Welfare Officer<br />
• Executive Engineer, CMU<br />
• Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer, CMU<br />
• NGO representative<br />
• PAP representative, and<br />
• Kannngo, CMU (only cases related to land)<br />
The objective <strong>of</strong> GRC is to settle as many disputes through consultation and to reduce<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> court cases. NGO contracted by the project would help the PAPs in<br />
bringing out their cases before the GRC for redressal. It is expected that the NGO and<br />
social development <strong>of</strong>ficer and EP will try to resole the case amicably before<br />
approaching the GRC. If the EP is not satisfied with the preliminary level <strong>of</strong> redressal<br />
outcome, the NGO shall forward the case to GRC for formal proceeding. The GRC<br />
would hear complaints lodged by <strong>Project</strong> Affected Persons and facilitate solutions. The<br />
GRC may undertake field investigation with concerned PAPs, if required. The GRC will<br />
resolve the grievances <strong>of</strong> the eligible persons within the stipulated time period (one<br />
month). The response time prescribed for GRC is 15 days. Since the entire resettlement<br />
component <strong>of</strong> the project has to be completed before the start <strong>of</strong> civil construction,<br />
the GRC will meet at least once in a month. However, the GRC may meet more<br />
frequently depending upon the number <strong>of</strong> cases. The decision <strong>of</strong> the GRC will be final,<br />
unless vacated by court <strong>of</strong> law. The decision <strong>of</strong> the GRC will not be binding for PAP to<br />
take recourse to the civil court if he/she so desires. The GRC will continue to function,<br />
for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the PAPs, during the entire cycle <strong>of</strong> the project including the defects<br />
liability periods. The grievance redressal stages are presented in figure 8.1. The NGO will<br />
maintain the grievance record for each and every case. A sample format for<br />
maintaining record is attached in Annexure VII.<br />
8.3. District Level Committee (DLC)<br />
A district Level Committee will be formed to meet at periodic interval to review the<br />
progress <strong>of</strong> land acquisition and facilitate implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP in the district.<br />
District Level Committee would comprise <strong>of</strong> the following members:<br />
• Deputy Commissioner (Chairman)<br />
• Land Acquisition Officer<br />
• Executive Engineer (PWD)<br />
• NGO<br />
• The Chairman <strong>of</strong> Block Samiti<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 116
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• The Mayor/Chairman/President <strong>of</strong> Municipal Corporation/Municipal<br />
Committee/Nagar Panchayat/Commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Municipal Corporation/<br />
Executive Officer.<br />
• A representative <strong>of</strong> PAPs.<br />
8.4. Functions <strong>of</strong> the GRC<br />
The functions <strong>of</strong> the grievance committee shall be<br />
• To provide support for the EPs on problems arising out <strong>of</strong> LA/property acquisition<br />
• To record the grievances <strong>of</strong> the EPs, categorise and prioritise them and take<br />
expeditious steps to solve them within a month.<br />
• To inform HPRIDC <strong>of</strong> serious cases within an appropriate time frame<br />
PAPs<br />
Grievance<br />
Assistance Compensation<br />
Redressed<br />
NGO<br />
Competent<br />
Authority<br />
Redressed<br />
Not<br />
Redressed<br />
Not<br />
Redressed<br />
Redressed GRC GRC Redressed<br />
Not<br />
Redressed<br />
Not<br />
Redressed<br />
Redressed DLC DLC Redressed<br />
Not<br />
Redressed<br />
Not<br />
Redressed<br />
Arbitration Arbitration Redressed<br />
Not<br />
Redressed<br />
Judiciary<br />
Figure 8.1: Grievance Redress Stages<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 117
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• To report to the aggrieved parties about the developments regarding their<br />
grievance & decision <strong>of</strong> HPRIDC.<br />
• To prioritise cases based on following criteria:<br />
• Cases pertaining to the land and structures <strong>of</strong> displaced persons<br />
• Review the progress <strong>of</strong> land acquisition and compensation, if acquisition is<br />
under LA Act 1894<br />
• Relocation and rehabilitation<br />
• Endorsement <strong>of</strong> micro plan<br />
• Disbursement <strong>of</strong> assistance, and<br />
• Inclusion <strong>of</strong> PAPs in various development or employment generation<br />
government programme.<br />
8.5. Arbitration<br />
An arbitrator would be appointed by the <strong>Project</strong> Authority in order to settle the dispute.<br />
Cases not resolved at GRC level would be brought for arbitration. A time period <strong>of</strong> two<br />
months would be available for arbitration. In case at this level the dispute is also not<br />
resolved, the aggrieved person may take recourse to the civil court.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 118
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 9 - INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT<br />
9.1. Background<br />
An established institutional mechanism for implementation <strong>of</strong> resettlement programmes<br />
is essential for successful implementation <strong>of</strong> RAP and it is more so imperative in case <strong>of</strong><br />
HPPWD since the agency have no prior experience and expertise in implementing such<br />
programmes. Thus, timely establishment and involvement <strong>of</strong> appropriate R and R<br />
institutions and individuals would significantly facilitate achievement <strong>of</strong> the objectives<br />
<strong>of</strong> the R&R Programme. This chapter address the institutional requirement and provides<br />
a strategy for developing required implementation capacity and minimising risks during<br />
RAP implementation. Capacity building and training are co-ordinated with the project<br />
implementation schedule to ensure availability <strong>of</strong> skilled staff to implement the RAP. The<br />
main institutions would include in R&R implementation process are:<br />
• HPRIDC<br />
• World Bank<br />
• Local Administration<br />
• Line Departments<br />
• NGO/CBO<br />
• Training Institutions<br />
• Grievance Redress Cell/ District Level Committee<br />
• Monitoring & Evaluation Agency<br />
9.2. HP Road and Other Infrastructure Development Corporation<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> Pradsh Road and Other Infrastructure Development Corporation (HPRIDC) is<br />
the mother body for all infrastructural development in the state. Since the mandate <strong>of</strong><br />
HPRIDC is larger than only road development in the state, the organisational setup has<br />
been formulated accordingly with Chief Secretary being the chairman <strong>of</strong> the<br />
corporation; Principal Secretary PWD is the Managing Director. The other members in<br />
the board are Principal Secretary <strong>of</strong> finance, transport, revenue, forest, Chief Minister<br />
and Engineer in Chief <strong>of</strong> HPPWD. The organisation structure is given in figure 9.1.<br />
Figure 9.1: Organisational Structure <strong>of</strong> HPRIDC<br />
Chairman, Chief Secretary, Govt. <strong>of</strong> HP<br />
Managing Director, PS (PWD), Govt. <strong>of</strong> HP<br />
Principal<br />
Secretary<br />
Finance, Govt.<br />
<strong>of</strong> HP<br />
Principal<br />
Secretary<br />
Transport,<br />
Govt. <strong>of</strong> HP<br />
Principal<br />
Secretary<br />
Revenue,<br />
Govt. <strong>of</strong> HP<br />
Principal<br />
Secretary<br />
Forest, Govt.<br />
<strong>of</strong> HP<br />
Principal<br />
Secretary CM,<br />
Govt. <strong>of</strong> HP<br />
Engineer-in-<br />
Chief, HPPWD<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Director, HPSRP<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 119
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
9.3. HP State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>Project</strong> Director is responsible for the day to day affaires <strong>of</strong> the HP State Road <strong>Project</strong>.<br />
There will be Corridor Management Unit package level to support the PD in managing<br />
the project at field level on behalf <strong>of</strong> him. The CMU will be headed by an Executive<br />
Engineer and supported by Assistant Engineers. There will be an Environment and Social<br />
Management Unit at the corporate level. <strong>Project</strong> Director is the head <strong>of</strong> this unit. Under<br />
ESMU there will be two separate unit called Environment Management Unit (EMU) and<br />
Social Management Unit (SMU) dealing with implementation <strong>of</strong> environment<br />
management plan and resettlement action respectively. The SMU will be headed by a<br />
Social Development Officer who will be responsible for day to day handling <strong>of</strong> social,<br />
resettlement and land related issue with the help <strong>of</strong> NGO hired for the purpose. The<br />
Social Development Officer will be assisted by Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer<br />
at the Corridor Management Unit level. The Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer will<br />
work as ear and eyes for the SMU in the field. The proposed organisation chart is<br />
presented in figure 9.2.<br />
Figure 9.2: Organisational Structure <strong>of</strong> SMU<br />
Chief Engineer -Cum -<strong>Project</strong><br />
Director, Head ESMU<br />
Environment Management<br />
Unit, Environment Officer<br />
Social Management Unit,<br />
Social Dev. <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />
CMU<br />
Shimla<br />
CMU<br />
Una<br />
CMU<br />
Bhoota<br />
RRO, CMU<br />
SHIMLA<br />
RRO, CMU<br />
UNA<br />
RRO, CMU<br />
BHOOTA<br />
NGO GRC DISTRICT LEVEL<br />
COMMITTEE<br />
9.3.1. THE PROCESS<br />
HPRIDC need to focus its effort in few areas to commence RAP implementation:<br />
• Initiate the process, orientation and awareness train session for the HPRIDC and<br />
other RAP implementers<br />
• Establish an Environment and Social Management Unit (ESMU)<br />
• NGOs with experience in social development sector and in resettlement and<br />
rehabilitation matters has been selected and made partners in RAP<br />
implementation.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 120
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• Establish Coordination Committee with representatives from local selfgovernment,<br />
PAPs and implementing NGO. The objective <strong>of</strong> this committee will<br />
be to coordinate between various implementing agencies.<br />
9.3.2 ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT UNIT<br />
Effective RAP implementation will require institutional relationships and responsibilities,<br />
rapid organisational development and collaborative efforts by HPRIDC, State<br />
<strong>Government</strong>, partner NGO and affected population. It is ideal to have representation<br />
<strong>of</strong> other line department’s viz., revenue, forest, public health, rural engineering, etc. in<br />
ESMU. However, the final requirements shall be<br />
The ESMU consist <strong>of</strong>:<br />
decided by HPRIDC. The ESMU will establish<br />
• Chief Engineer cum <strong>Project</strong><br />
operational links within HPRIDC and with other<br />
Director<br />
agencies <strong>of</strong> government involved in projectinduced<br />
resettlement. It will bridge the distance<br />
• Social Development Officer<br />
between the project and project affected<br />
• Environment Officer<br />
persons and communities. It will provide the • Support Staff<br />
means and mechanisms for co-ordinating the<br />
delivery <strong>of</strong> the compensation and assistance entitled to those who will suffer loss due to<br />
the project. ESMU will link the project with state government agencies, provide liaison<br />
with HPRIDC field units and impacted communities, and establish district level<br />
committees to co-ordinate social development and resettlement operations in the field<br />
and also to assist NGO partners. It will also engage required training services, oversee a<br />
grievance redress process and actively monitor RAP implementation.<br />
9.3.3. SOCIAL MANAGEMENT UNIT<br />
On behalf <strong>of</strong> HPRIDC, the ESMU will assume The CMU consist <strong>of</strong>:<br />
• Executive Engineer<br />
the responsibility for representing the social<br />
• Asst. Engineer (Resettlement and<br />
impact and resettlement components <strong>of</strong><br />
the project for environment clearance. The<br />
Rehabilitation Officer)<br />
ESMU will also be responsible for • Asst. Engineer (Environment<br />
disseminating this information to the public<br />
Officer)<br />
and providing additional opportunities for • Asst. Engineer (Technical)<br />
public comment. Among government<br />
• Asst. Engineer (Utility)<br />
agencies, the revenue department will<br />
• Kanoongo ( Nayab Tehsildar)<br />
have the most important role. While the<br />
responsibility for land acquisition and payment <strong>of</strong> compensation for land acquired<br />
(including properties there on) lies with the Revenue Department, the ESMU has to<br />
assume responsibility for co-ordinating various matters with the Revenue Department so<br />
that both physical possession <strong>of</strong> land acquired and payment <strong>of</strong> compensation is not<br />
unduly delayed. The responsibility for income restoration and replacement <strong>of</strong> common<br />
property resources would fully be with the ESMU along with the nodal NGO.<br />
The ESMU will be headed by the <strong>Project</strong> Director <strong>of</strong> the rank <strong>of</strong> Chief Engineer, Social<br />
Development Officer <strong>of</strong> HPRIDC at corporate level and Resettlement and<br />
Rehabilitation Officers <strong>of</strong> HPRIDC responsible for implementation <strong>of</strong> RAP at field level.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 121
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
The CMU <strong>of</strong> HPRIDC at field level with active support from NGO will implement the RAP<br />
on ground and support from Social Development Officer. Since the Revenue<br />
Department has district wise jurisdiction; the respective CMU and Resettlement and<br />
Rehabilitation Officer will co-ordinate with revenue department. The HPRIDC has<br />
already inducted Social Development Officer. The Resettlement and Rehabilitation<br />
Officers at CMU level will be posted for the project period by HPRIDC in due course <strong>of</strong><br />
time. The Resettlement and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong>ficer will be rank <strong>of</strong> Assistant Engineer. In<br />
addition to Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer at the CMU level a Kanoongo (rank<br />
<strong>of</strong> Nayab Tehsildar) will be made part <strong>of</strong> CMU to look after land acquisition matter.<br />
However, the Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officers will be provided with orientation<br />
training prior to take-up their assignment in field. The responsibilities <strong>of</strong> various<br />
stakeholders in RAP implementation is described in table 9.1.<br />
Table9.1: Responsibilities <strong>of</strong> various stakeholders in RAP<br />
implementation<br />
Position<br />
Responsibilities<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Director • Overall responsibility <strong>of</strong> Implementation <strong>of</strong> R&R activities <strong>of</strong> RP;<br />
• Ensure availability <strong>of</strong> budget for R&R activities;<br />
• Will be holding review meeting every month.<br />
Social<br />
Development<br />
• Will manage the day to day implementation <strong>of</strong> R&R activity<br />
on behalf <strong>of</strong> PD<br />
Officer<br />
• Monitor land acquisition and R&R progress;<br />
• Monitor and supervise the NGO hired for RAP implementation;<br />
• Prepare pamphlets <strong>of</strong> the policy;<br />
• Printing <strong>of</strong> the policy and identity cards for the PAPs;<br />
• Ensure the development <strong>of</strong> resettlement sites, wherever<br />
required;<br />
• Participate in the allotment <strong>of</strong> residential, commercial and<br />
agricultural plots;<br />
• Liaison with district administration for government’s income<br />
generating and developmental programs for the PAPs;<br />
• Ensure the inclusion <strong>of</strong> those PAPs who may have not been<br />
covered during the census survey; facilitate the opening <strong>of</strong><br />
joint accounts in local banks to transfer assistance for R&R for<br />
PAFs, and organize the disbursement <strong>of</strong> cheques for<br />
assistance in the affected area in public;<br />
• Monitor physical and financial progress on land acquisition<br />
and R&R activities;<br />
• Participate in regular meetings;<br />
• Organize monthly meetings with the NGO to review the<br />
progress on R&R;<br />
• Preparation <strong>of</strong> quarterly progress report; and<br />
• Review micro plan and monthly reports submitted by NGO.<br />
CMU staff • Oversee Construction;<br />
• Attend to social and environmental issues including<br />
permission and Liaison with line departments,<br />
• Shifting <strong>of</strong> utilities in consultation with concerned<br />
departments, and<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 122
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Position<br />
Responsibilities<br />
• facilitating land acquisition<br />
NGO • Survey and verification <strong>of</strong> the PAFs;<br />
• Verification <strong>of</strong> land records followed by verification on the<br />
spot related to identified plots and owners;<br />
• Develop rapport with the PAPs;<br />
• Photograph <strong>of</strong> each AP for ID cards;<br />
• Assist to issue identity cards to the PAFs;<br />
• Co-ordinate with the Social development and land<br />
acquisition <strong>of</strong>ficer and CMU staff to implement R&R activities;<br />
• Conduct market feasibility study;<br />
• Valuation <strong>of</strong> properties/assets for finalization <strong>of</strong> replacement<br />
value;<br />
• Undertake public information campaign at the<br />
commencement <strong>of</strong> the projects;<br />
• Distribute the pamphlets <strong>of</strong> R&R policy to the PAPs;<br />
• Assist the PAPs in receiving the compensation;<br />
• Facilitate the process <strong>of</strong> arranging loans for PDPs<br />
• Facilitate the opening <strong>of</strong> joint accounts<br />
• Generate awareness about the alternate economic<br />
livelihood and enable the PAFs to make informed choice;<br />
• Prepare micro-plans for R&R;<br />
• Enable the PAFs to identify the alternate sites for agriculture,<br />
residential and commercial plots;<br />
• Participate in the consultation on allotment <strong>of</strong> shops and<br />
residential plots;<br />
• Ensure the PAPs have received their entitlements;<br />
• Ensure the preparation <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation sites;<br />
• Participate in the meetings organized by the CMU;<br />
• Submit monthly progress reports;<br />
• Identify training needs and institutions for the PAPs for income<br />
generating activities;<br />
• Participate in the disbursement <strong>of</strong> cheques for the assistance<br />
at public places;<br />
• Coordinate the training programs <strong>of</strong> the PAPs for income<br />
generating activities;<br />
• Coordinate the meeting <strong>of</strong> District Level Committees;<br />
• Helping PAPs to file grievances;<br />
• Accompany EP to GRC;<br />
• Maintaining records <strong>of</strong> grievances with decision<br />
• Awareness campaigns for highway related diseases; and<br />
• Ensure the AP judiciously uses compensation and R&R<br />
assistance.<br />
Grievance<br />
• To address the grievances <strong>of</strong> the PAPs brought by NGO<br />
Redressal<br />
related to compensation assistance or any other related to<br />
Committee<br />
R&R;<br />
• Give its decision on the grievances within specific time frame;<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 123
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Position<br />
District<br />
Committee<br />
Level<br />
Impact Evaluation<br />
Consultant<br />
Responsibilities<br />
• Supervising GRC record maintained by NGO.<br />
• Address the grievances forwarded by the GRC within<br />
specified time frame<br />
• Convey the decision to AP<br />
• Mid Term and End Term evaluation <strong>of</strong> RAP Implementation<br />
9.4. Need for NGO/CBO<br />
The relocation disturbs the present activities <strong>of</strong> PAPs and therefore there is a need to<br />
establish and stabilise their livelihood. While all tasks relating to Land Acquisition are<br />
taken care by the Land Acquisition Officer and his staff, the implementation <strong>of</strong> RAP is<br />
the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the ESMU. The NGO will help in implementing various components<br />
<strong>of</strong> the RAP, particularly the use <strong>of</strong> compensation and rehabilitation assistance for more<br />
productive purposes like purchase <strong>of</strong> land, self-employment, etc. Its involvement is all<br />
the more important since PWD neither has neither the experience nor the requisite<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional in dealing with such kind <strong>of</strong> issues. The NGO selected will have to work<br />
directly under the social development <strong>of</strong>ficer who will be in charge <strong>of</strong> implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> RAP. Thus implementation becomes the joint responsibility <strong>of</strong> HPRIDC and.<br />
9.4.1. ROLE OF NGO<br />
Involuntary resettlement is a sensitive issue and experience in R&R matters will be<br />
required by the ESMU. A good rapport with the affected community will facilitate a<br />
satisfactory R&R <strong>of</strong> the PAPs and minimize disturbance particularly physical and<br />
economic. To overcome this deficiency, experience and well-qualified NGO in this field<br />
has been engaged to assist the HPRIDC in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP. NGO hired<br />
for RP implementation will also be responsible for HIV/AIDS, trafficking <strong>of</strong> women and<br />
child, child labour, etc. The NGO should have experience <strong>of</strong> addressing such social<br />
issues. The NGO, in this sense, will have to ensure that the due entitlements flow to the<br />
PAPs in the most effective and transparent manner. The success <strong>of</strong> the NGO inputs will<br />
largely depend on their liaison with the PAPs and other concerned government<br />
agencies. Other involved agencies are expected to collaborate with <strong>Project</strong>, based<br />
on instructions from the HPRIDC, in accordance with the policy framework and the<br />
RAP. These arrangements have to be made during the first month <strong>of</strong> <strong>Project</strong><br />
implementation in order to set up the various committees and implementation<br />
mechanisms required for the project.<br />
The role <strong>of</strong> NGO will be <strong>of</strong> a facilitator. The NGO will work as a link between the ESMU<br />
and the affected community. They will educate the PAPs on the need to implement<br />
the <strong>Project</strong>, on aspects relating to LA and R&R measures and ensures proper utilization<br />
<strong>of</strong> various compensations extended to the PAPs under the R&R entitlement package.<br />
After the approval <strong>of</strong> the micro plans, the NGO will issue identity cards to the entitled<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 124
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
persons. NGO Consultancy will be to facilitate the resettlement process. Its broad<br />
objectives will be to:<br />
• Build rapport with PAPs and CMU<br />
• Educate PAPs on their rights, entitlements, and obligations under the RP;<br />
• Ensuring that PAPs receive their full entitlements;<br />
• Where options are available, the NGO shall provide advice to PAPs on<br />
relative benefits <strong>of</strong> each option;<br />
• Assist PAPs on grievance redressal through the established system;<br />
• Collect data as required to help ESMU to monitor and assess progress;<br />
Briefly, its activities will be to:<br />
• Develop rapport between the PAPs and the ESMU;<br />
• Develop project level plans for R&R in consultation with the PAPs and<br />
communicate same to ESMU;<br />
• Explain to the PAPs about the options available for their land and properties<br />
acquired for the <strong>Project</strong>;<br />
• Assist the PAPs to identify suitable land for agricultural purposes;<br />
• Assist HPRIDC in making arrangements for the smooth relocation <strong>of</strong> the PAPs;<br />
• Ensure proper utilization by the PAPs <strong>of</strong> various compensations available<br />
under the R&R package;<br />
• Assist the PAPs in getting benefits from various government development<br />
programs;<br />
• Help the PAPs in the redressal <strong>of</strong> their grievances at the Grievance Redressal<br />
Committee;<br />
• Train the PAPs, if necessary, in acquiring literacy and income-generation<br />
related schemes;<br />
• Provide appropriate field staff; and<br />
• Any other responsibility that may be assigned by the HPRIDC for the welfare<br />
<strong>of</strong> the affected communities.<br />
In assisting the PAPs to choose among different options available to them, analysis must<br />
first be made <strong>of</strong> likely benefits and potential risks for each <strong>of</strong> the options. Conducting<br />
this analysis is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the HPRIDC, in collaboration with the agencies<br />
(government or NGO) engaged in implementing the various activities. Following such<br />
an analysis, the risks and benefits shall be explained to the PAPs and sufficient time<br />
given to them to make an informed choice. In choosing between different options,<br />
ensure that those PAPs considered vulnerable are encouraged to choose the options<br />
entailing the lowest risk.<br />
In order to carry out such tasks, the employees <strong>of</strong> the NGO are to be stationed in the<br />
project area. Besides contacting the PAPs on an individual basis to regularly update<br />
the baseline information group meetings and village-level meetings will be conducted<br />
by the NGO on a regular basis. The frequencies <strong>of</strong> such meetings will depend on the<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 125
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> the PAPs but should occur at least once a month. The NGO will have to<br />
encourage participation <strong>of</strong> individual PAPs in such meeting by discussing their<br />
problems regarding LA, R&R and other aspects relating to their socio-economic lives.<br />
Such participation will make it easier to find a solution acceptable to all involved.<br />
9.5. Training and Capacity Building<br />
Establishment <strong>of</strong> adequate implementation capacity to launch and carry out the<br />
components <strong>of</strong> resettlement must be completed before the start <strong>of</strong> civil works. To<br />
enhance capabilities, ESMU staff can be sent on exposure visits to other projects with<br />
good resettlement programmes as well as sponsored for training courses in<br />
Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R). A two weeks course in R&R is conducted by the<br />
Administrative Staff College <strong>of</strong> India (ASCI) in Hyderabad. The training would also cover<br />
techniques <strong>of</strong> conducting participatory rural appraisal for micro planning, conducting<br />
census and socio-economic surveys, dissemination <strong>of</strong> information, community<br />
consultation and conducting <strong>of</strong> monitoring and evaluation.<br />
9.5.1. AREAS OF CAPACITY BUILDING<br />
Land acquisition and R&R implementation process generally is a long drawn and<br />
demanding process. The existing capacity <strong>of</strong> HPRIDC for this purpose is negligible with<br />
respect to R&R implementation; however, the HPPWD has its land acquisition <strong>of</strong>ficers at<br />
circle/zone level. The existing capacity <strong>of</strong> HPPWD should be used in processing the<br />
things faster with the revenue department. For implementation <strong>of</strong> resettlement action<br />
plan an NGO has been contracted to help HPRIDC in field. Having contracted NGO for<br />
resettlement plan implementation is a step forward in right direction but HPRIDC need<br />
to upgrade its capacity in various aspects related to resettlement implementation for<br />
successful exaction and supervision.<br />
Though revenue department <strong>of</strong> state government will do the acquisition, it will require<br />
constant follow up. Hence the responsibility will come on social development <strong>of</strong>ficer.<br />
Among other pressing assignments viz., identification and verification <strong>of</strong> PAFs, Issuing<br />
Identity cards, development <strong>of</strong> resettlement sites, etc, social development <strong>of</strong>ficer will<br />
also be responsible for regular follow up <strong>of</strong> land acquisition. In light <strong>of</strong> the above,<br />
following training modules has been suggested during initial phases and repeat training<br />
sessions <strong>of</strong> HPRIDC staff (both at head <strong>of</strong>fice and at field level) and NGO staff will be<br />
held throughout the project cycle table 9.2.<br />
Module<br />
Overview <strong>of</strong><br />
social issues<br />
Social Impact<br />
Assessment<br />
Land Acquisition<br />
Table 9.2: training module for HPRIDC staff<br />
Topics<br />
Social issues; methodology followed for SIA; entitlement framework<br />
and detailed R&R policy.<br />
Definition; steps; output; required surveys viz., screening, census,<br />
socio-economic, verification, etc.; issues to look at for preparation<br />
<strong>of</strong> entitlement framework; institutional capacity.<br />
Legal and operational issues; LA Act – 1894; LA issues in HPSRP,<br />
examples <strong>of</strong> direct land purchase/consent award from other road<br />
projects.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 126
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Resettlement<br />
Public<br />
Consultations<br />
Issues pertaining to planning and preparation for relocation;<br />
implementation issues; factors necessary for identification and<br />
finalisation <strong>of</strong> resettlement areas.<br />
Issues to be discussed during various stages <strong>of</strong> project viz.,<br />
preparation, implementation and post implementation; public<br />
consultation in project delivery; techniques <strong>of</strong> public consultations.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 127
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 10 - HIGHWAY RELATED DISEASES<br />
10.1. Introduction<br />
World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that by the year 2000, 30 to 40 million<br />
people would have become HIV infected in the world, and around 90% <strong>of</strong> them are<br />
likely to be in the developing countries. Of the total HIV infected people around 12-18<br />
million would have developed AIDS. According to the report <strong>of</strong> monitoring the AIDS<br />
Pandemic (MAP) on ‘The Status and Trends <strong>of</strong> the HIV/AIDS/STD Epidemics in Asia and<br />
the Pacific’, India is reported to have had a sharp increase in the estimated HIV<br />
infections over the years. The National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) figures, on<br />
the status <strong>of</strong> HIV infections and AIDS cases in India as on August 31, 1998, place the<br />
country’s zero-positive rate at 23.64 per thousand; the trend is apparently upward.<br />
However, distribution <strong>of</strong> the incidences <strong>of</strong> infection is uneven among different parts <strong>of</strong><br />
the country.<br />
Throughout the World, the growth <strong>of</strong> transport system has been, and continuous to be,<br />
a key element in economic development. In both developed and underdeveloped<br />
countries, increase in gross national product (GNP) is accompanied by greater<br />
investment in both vehicle and transport infrastructure. In the developing world, current<br />
trends in population, industrialization, and urbanization are putting heavy pressure on<br />
the transport networks in general [WHO, 1984]. This in fact has resulted in the unlimited<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> new transport companies and, subsequently, vehicles and crewmembers all<br />
over the country. WHO document indicate the existence <strong>of</strong> two to five million<br />
crewmembers <strong>of</strong> inter-city trucks in India. Besides being away from home for most part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the year (almost 11 months), these drivers (75 to 90%) have a high rate <strong>of</strong> sexual<br />
promiscuity with female commercial sex workers and other sex friends en-route their<br />
travel or at places where they stop for rest [WHO, 1994]. High mobility and frequent<br />
multi-partner sexual behaviour make these men a high-risk group for contracting<br />
STD/HIV infection. Besides their own personal risk, the highly mobile occupation leads to<br />
the transmission <strong>of</strong> infections from cities <strong>of</strong> high prevalence and also between cities<br />
and rural areas. Due to the kind <strong>of</strong> nomadic lifestyle, they are <strong>of</strong>ten not able to have<br />
access to modern health care facilities. They go to non-registered practitioners who<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten give false promises <strong>of</strong> treatment and care. Thus, there is a need to address the<br />
spread <strong>of</strong> highway diseases and take necessary action in controlling, the spread <strong>of</strong><br />
such diseases involving the truckers and the Commercial Sex Workers (CSW) through a<br />
strategic action oriented Programme.<br />
World Bank and other development agencies are now incorporating into the design <strong>of</strong><br />
infrastructure projects HIV/AIDS prevention programs targeting migrant construction<br />
workers and the local communities they interact with. World Bank has been addressing<br />
the need for reducing HIV/AIDS transmission in infrastructure projects in various ways.<br />
Road projects generally include an assurance in the loan agreements that the<br />
borrower will promote HIV/AIDS awareness and implement prevention programs. In<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 128
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
some cases, the need for information, education, and communication on HIV/AIDS<br />
and STDs is made a contractual obligation <strong>of</strong> the contractors.<br />
Moreover, Construction activities associated with the Road <strong>Project</strong> may also affect the<br />
spread <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS and STIs. A large number <strong>of</strong> workers will be stationed at work sites<br />
along the Highways. Mostly poor and seasonal, coming from the large pool <strong>of</strong> floating<br />
population including minority people, the workers will be predominantly young, sexually<br />
active people. The service provider communities and the resident communities<br />
bordering the construction sites, mainly minority groups vulnerable to HIV/AIDS, STIs,<br />
and trafficking for prostitution, are likely to interact with the construction workers. The<br />
interaction might lead to the introduction <strong>of</strong> HIV and STIs from the newcomers to the<br />
community members and vice versa. After completion <strong>of</strong> the works, workers with<br />
HIV/AIDS and STIs are likely to take them back to their communities <strong>of</strong> origin. Thus on<br />
HIV/AIDS and STI prevention program targeting construction workers and resident<br />
population needs to be implemented to mitigate these potential adverse social<br />
impacts.<br />
10.2. HIV Scenario in India<br />
It is estimated that there are more than 5.7 million Indians currently living with HIV.<br />
India’s highly heterogeneous epidemic is largely concentrated in seven states with over<br />
one percent antenatal prevalence (Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra <strong>Pradesh</strong>,<br />
Maharashtra, Goa,<br />
Manipur<br />
and<br />
Nagaland). Although<br />
some states appear to<br />
be experiencing<br />
stabilization in HIV<br />
prevalence, (Tamil<br />
Nadu, Andhra <strong>Pradesh</strong>,<br />
Karnataka, and<br />
Maharashtra)<br />
prevalence is increasing<br />
in at-risk populations in<br />
other states. The Indian<br />
epidemic continues to<br />
be concentrated in<br />
populations showing<br />
high risk behaviour<br />
characterized by<br />
unprotected sexual intercourse with multiple partners, anal sex, and injecting drug use<br />
with shared needles. Some high risk groups show very high prevalence <strong>of</strong> HIV infection,<br />
and sexual networks are wide and inter-digitating. The low rate <strong>of</strong> multiple partner<br />
concurrent sexual relationships among the wider community seem to have, so far,<br />
protected the larger body <strong>of</strong> people with 99 percent <strong>of</strong> the adult Indian population<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 129
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
being HIV negative. This situation is sought to be protected at all costs, as experience in<br />
other parts <strong>of</strong> the world has shown the potentially devastating impact <strong>of</strong> an HIV/AIDS<br />
epidemic on individuals and countries alike. The mode <strong>of</strong> transmission <strong>of</strong> the epidemic<br />
leads to a clustering <strong>of</strong> HIV infection and AIDS cases in turn. With an epidemic <strong>of</strong> a<br />
chronic infection that has now entered its 20th year, India is also discovering the visible<br />
‘face’ <strong>of</strong> the epidemic: that <strong>of</strong> a growing number <strong>of</strong> people living with HIV and AIDS.<br />
The statistics for AIDS cases may be a poor guide to the severity <strong>of</strong> the epidemic, as in<br />
many situations a patient will die without HIV having been diagnosed, and with the<br />
cause <strong>of</strong> death attributed to an opportunistic infection, such as tuberculosis. According<br />
to UNAIDS/WHO, between 270,000 and 680,000 Indians died <strong>of</strong> AIDS in 2005.<br />
10.3. HIV Scenario in HP<br />
There are a number <strong>of</strong> states where the HIV prevalence in antenatal women is 1% or<br />
more, and these are considered to be high prevalence states. The prevalence data<br />
are derived from the screening <strong>of</strong> women attending antenatal clinics (ANC), meaning<br />
that these prevalence rates are only relevant to sexually active women. However,<br />
these rates can provide a reasonable estimate <strong>of</strong> HIV prevalence within the general<br />
population in <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> state. The number <strong>of</strong> full blown AIDS cases in <strong>Himachal</strong><br />
<strong>Pradesh</strong> in 2005 was 252. The prevalence rates <strong>of</strong> AIDS taken from data collected<br />
during screening <strong>of</strong> women attending antenatal clinics shows that 0.13 percentages<br />
are infected.<br />
10.4. The Cause <strong>of</strong> the Spread <strong>of</strong> Highway Related Diseases<br />
Vehicles carrying people or goods over long distance are the frequent users <strong>of</strong><br />
highways (both national and state). It has been found that the drivers and helpers <strong>of</strong><br />
such long distance vehicles like truck <strong>of</strong>ten spend many days at a stretch, outside their<br />
homes and away from their family members. The factors <strong>of</strong> financial insecurity, tensions<br />
at work, being away from home for long duration give rise to irregular habits among<br />
the truck drivers and their assistants. Taking to alcohol and commercial sex is one the<br />
means <strong>of</strong> entertainment and releasing tension. For these solitary mobile men it is<br />
difficult to refrain from physical urges for over longer periods. These drivers and helpers<br />
or assistants take halts at different resting-places designated/naturally developed<br />
along the corridors. Thus the truckers and their assistants are found to have sex with<br />
many women on their way. Married mobile men <strong>of</strong>ten chose CSWs for satisfying their<br />
sexual urge <strong>of</strong> oral and anal sex that they do not practice at home with their wives.<br />
Thus sexual diseases are <strong>of</strong>ten found to spread rapidly along the road and highway<br />
corridors. On the other hand, tuberculosis (TB) and other like diseases are also found to<br />
spread through physical contacts along with STD and AIDS. Seeing the gravity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
spread <strong>of</strong> all these diseases proper measures are required to be taken to create<br />
awareness about their severity and to control such spread <strong>of</strong> diseases<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 130
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
10.5. Other Related Studies<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> research studies have been undertaken globally to determine the<br />
prevalence and epidemiology <strong>of</strong> HIV infection and AIDS. Many studies, conducted in<br />
various countries in Africa, have quite unambiguously identified the important role<br />
played by truck drivers and Itinerant roadside sex workers in the transmission <strong>of</strong> HIV<br />
Infection to different parts <strong>of</strong> a country (Orubuloye. et. al, 1992). Interventions to<br />
encourage the use <strong>of</strong> condoms among truck drivers and roadside sex workers have<br />
been successful in Tanzania, along the Trans-African Tanduma Highway (from 51% users<br />
to 91% users in less than one year) and in community based projects in Ciudad Juarez<br />
in Mexico and through media campaign in Philippines (WHO Press Release, Geneva.<br />
1992).<br />
Studies In India too have provided sufficient empirical data to confirm the direct<br />
linkage <strong>of</strong> sexual behaviour patterns among truck drivers in not only contacting HIV<br />
infections by themselves, but also transmitting it to other sex workers among various<br />
highways around the country (Singh Y.N, et. al, 1993). Some reports also talk about<br />
homosexual relations practiced by these drivers with their assistants (WHO, 1994) the<br />
crewmembers, their spouses and the female commercial sex workers serving these<br />
men on the route and also in the cities constitute a sexually active population <strong>of</strong> about<br />
5-12 million (WHO, 1994).<br />
Department for International Development (DFID) also carried out study entitled<br />
'Healthy Highway <strong>Project</strong>' earlier known as Truckers <strong>Project</strong>) which aimed at slowing<br />
down the spread <strong>of</strong> HIV by reducing the rate <strong>of</strong> STD infection and associate risk<br />
behaviours among the inter-city truck drivers. The study found out that, by virtue or,<br />
working in the unorganized sector, truckers are deprived <strong>of</strong> permanent employment,<br />
and other related benefits. They also lack emotional support for being away from<br />
home for longer periods. As a result <strong>of</strong> life, full <strong>of</strong> tensions, lack <strong>of</strong> emotional support<br />
and basic human facilities, the truckers take to alcohol and unsafe sex.<br />
Moreover, truckers are not aware <strong>of</strong> hazards <strong>of</strong> STD/HIV infections and therefore do not<br />
get proper medical facilities. They generally visit non-registered medical practitioners<br />
who mislead them with myths and misconceptions related to sexuality and in the<br />
process prolong the medication period. The key lessons learnt from the project, which<br />
can help address the issues <strong>of</strong> highway diseases in a much systematic way are:<br />
• Importance <strong>of</strong> need assessment<br />
• Behaviour change communication related to a very personal matter and<br />
creating enabling environment for this<br />
• Capacity building <strong>of</strong> staff engaged in the work<br />
• Facilities for STD treatment to truckers close to halt points and<br />
• Promotion <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> condoms<br />
The project finally suggests the involvement <strong>of</strong> the private sector as an important<br />
component <strong>of</strong> the global strategy to fight the spread <strong>of</strong> HIV/ADIS epidemic. Apart from<br />
social implications, there are economic reasons as well for seeking the involvement <strong>of</strong><br />
industry. The 'Healthy Highways <strong>Project</strong>' has been attempting to develop working<br />
partnerships with the private sector. The efforts thus can be summed up as a search for<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 131
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
feasible and replicable models. One <strong>of</strong> the studies carried out by Society for Promotion<br />
<strong>of</strong> Youth and Masses (SPYM) on trucks plying on major highways revealed that 27% <strong>of</strong><br />
the truck drivers were suffering from different types <strong>of</strong> STDs and 56% <strong>of</strong> the truckers had<br />
a history <strong>of</strong> STD. Nearly two fifths <strong>of</strong> them accepted that they had passed on STD to<br />
their wives.<br />
Field trials conducted by AIDS Research Foundation <strong>of</strong> India (ARFI) who have been<br />
involved in HIV Intervention Programme among truckers in the south have shown that<br />
STD infections among drivers were very high. According to their volunteers at out-reach<br />
centers. In Tamil Nadu having STD clinics 9 out <strong>of</strong> 10 seeking treatment were invariably<br />
diagnosed for having STDs. Recent research in Tamil Nadu showed that 25% <strong>of</strong> the lorry<br />
drivers were HIV positive. The Bhoruka Research Center for Hematology and Blood<br />
Transmission, in its survey at Uluberia (West Bengal) check post showed that the<br />
prevalence rate <strong>of</strong> STDs among truckers was as high as 30%. The survey also revealed<br />
that 5.4% <strong>of</strong> the 1,357 truck drivers and their assistants were HIV positive. According to<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficial data <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Tropical Medicine, which monitors HIV/AIDS in West Bengal,<br />
29% <strong>of</strong> the 248 persons who tested positive by Western Blot method till June 1, 1994<br />
were truckers.<br />
10.5.1. SURVEY AMONG TRUCKERS ALONG THE CORRIDOR<br />
In order to study the issues <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS during the preparation <strong>of</strong> RAP, a survey was<br />
carried out among truckers who ply on the project corridor. This survey was carried out<br />
at different locations. Group discussions were held with truckers and other stakeholders<br />
especially the road side eateries involving truckers. The locations identified for GDs<br />
were mainly dhabas where large number <strong>of</strong> truckers gathers at one point <strong>of</strong> time.<br />
10.5.2. THE OBJECTIVE OF SURVEY<br />
The objectives <strong>of</strong> survey were:<br />
• Health seeking behaviours <strong>of</strong> truck drivers including the barriers to accessing<br />
sexual health services<br />
• Information on sexual networking (both male to male sex and male female sex)<br />
• Present availability <strong>of</strong> health services addressing STD diagnosis and treatment<br />
and their perceived accessibility and appropriateness<br />
Accordingly, Group Discussion (GD) was carried out among truck drivers and their<br />
assistants, focusing on their sexual practices and related health seeking behaviour, their<br />
knowledge, attitude and perception about STD/HIV, and access to health care<br />
facilities.<br />
10.5.3. KEY FINDINGS<br />
The following are some <strong>of</strong> the key findings, which surfaced out from the survey<br />
pertaining to the High Way Related Diseases among the truck drivers:<br />
• The participants reported that during a single, short trip, they remained away<br />
from home for 15- 20 days.<br />
• The cabin crew usually included two drivers and one assistant, <strong>of</strong>ten termed as<br />
cleaner/helper. Depending on the distance they traveled, they stopped the<br />
vehicle two to five times on the way for a period <strong>of</strong> half an hour to two hours. At<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 132
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
times stops are also made when the drivers gets too drunk. In such cases and<br />
especially during summer season, the halt period extends up to 5 - 6 hours.<br />
• The average salary for the driver ranges from Rs 3500 to Rs 6000 per month.<br />
Apart from low salaries, they are not allowed to take leave and are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
dismissed without prior notice.<br />
• The irregular life style, food habits and personal hygiene made them vulnerable<br />
to a number <strong>of</strong> health problems.<br />
• The local term for STD is Garmi-rog or Gupt-rog. All participants were aware <strong>of</strong><br />
the disease and extremely reluctant to disclose the information about suffering<br />
from sexual related disease.<br />
• It was revealed that the chances <strong>of</strong> unmarried contracting sexual disease is<br />
more than the married one since married ones have wife at home to have sex.<br />
• Most <strong>of</strong> the crewmembers have heard about AIDS but very little knowledge<br />
about HIV.<br />
• Roadside eateries (Dhabas and tea stalls) are the nodal points for truckers and<br />
CSWs. In addition to this, the CSWs stand along the highway at secluded<br />
locations from where they are picked up by the truckers.<br />
• Though drivers were aware <strong>of</strong> the need to use condoms, during the sexual<br />
relationship with CSWs as revealed by the drivers, few <strong>of</strong> them used condom in<br />
actual practice.<br />
• Condoms any way are not available on highways and no trucker carries them<br />
along.<br />
• Truckers after getting infected, reportedly prefers home remedies first, further<br />
deterioration leads them to practitioners without any formal medical training.<br />
Proper medical treatment is sought only when case deteriorates further.<br />
The Study revealed some interesting reasons for seeking commercial sex<br />
10.5.4. THE REASONS FOR SEEKING COMMERCIAL SEX BY THE TRUCKERS:<br />
• Prolonged absence from home leading to strong sexual desire<br />
• Alcohol intake increases sexual urge and sex is regarded as only source <strong>of</strong><br />
entertainment<br />
• The drivers seeking commercial sex is opportunity to indulge in anal and oral sex<br />
with commercial sex workers, which they do not practice with their wife<br />
• Often tea stalls are run by CSWs. Otherwise, dhaba owners acts as middlemen<br />
and brings CSWs to the highways<br />
• When highway passes through the city, CSWs are picked up from cinema halls,<br />
railway stations, wine shops or at loading and unloading points<br />
10.5.5. GENERAL PRACTICE BY THE TRUCKERS WHILE INDULGING IN COMMERCIAL SEX:<br />
• Consumption <strong>of</strong> alcohol before indulging in sexual activities<br />
• Even CSW consumes alcohol as ' sexual activity with more than one partner at a<br />
time is almost impossible for the CSWs<br />
• Though drivers are aware <strong>of</strong> the need to use condoms, few <strong>of</strong> them used<br />
condom in actual practice<br />
• The primary reason for non-use <strong>of</strong> condoms was poor availability in rural areas.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 133
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• In case <strong>of</strong> any infection, home remedies are first tried which included washing <strong>of</strong><br />
genitals with antiseptic solution (dettol) or by their own urine. Further<br />
deterioration leads them to practitioners without any formal medical training.<br />
Proper medical treatment is sought only when case deteriorates further.<br />
10.5.6. EMERGING ISSUES<br />
• The truckers face pr<strong>of</strong>essional and social degradation and are stigmatized for<br />
living a sexually promiscuous life style<br />
• Indulge in multiple heterosexual relationships, irrespective <strong>of</strong> age and marital<br />
status. They seem to prefer to have sexual relationship with highway CSWs being<br />
less expensive and easily accessible than those in urban areas thereby exposing<br />
the rural population to the risk <strong>of</strong> STD<br />
• Awareness <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS is negligible or very little<br />
• High indulgence in casual sex calls for an intervention that addresses their sexual<br />
networking in the general population<br />
• Poor medical facilities on the highway and apathy shown by the health<br />
providers compel them to seek improper treatment for STD. Strengthening rural<br />
medical infrastructure and service outlets on the highways were the felt needs <strong>of</strong><br />
the truckers<br />
• The truckers hardly use condoms during the contact with CSWs<br />
• Truckers have limited exposure to information on causes <strong>of</strong> spread and measures<br />
for prevention <strong>of</strong> STD and HIV/AIDS<br />
10.6. Measures for Controlling the Spread <strong>of</strong> Highway Diseases<br />
10.6.1. APPROACH FOR IMPLEMENTING THE MEASURES<br />
Before any measures are taken up, it is important to conduct a detailed mapping<br />
exercise, with the help <strong>of</strong> the NGO selected for implementation in all the project<br />
corridors. The mapping will help in making systematic observation, sampling in the later<br />
stages and to select key informants to facilitate targeted interventions. Following tasks<br />
will be followed:<br />
Task 1: For targeted interventions, NGO responsible for RAP implementation will have to<br />
coordinate with NGO working with State AIDS Control Organisation (SACO). NGOs<br />
working with SACO will be district wise segregated to identify the NGO working in the<br />
project districts.<br />
Task 2: Once the identification is over, implementing NGO will tie – up with SACO NGO<br />
to implement measures for controlling spread <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />
Task 3: Implementing NGO in coordination with SACO NGO will be responsible for:<br />
• Indicating the type <strong>of</strong> information to be disseminated<br />
• Locations where interventions are to be carried out<br />
• Frequency <strong>of</strong> undertaking the interventions<br />
• Availability <strong>of</strong> doctors, peer educators, etc<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> infrastructure facilities at selected locations<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 134
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
10.6.2. MEASURES FOR CONTROLLING THE SPREAD<br />
The following measures can be adopted for the control <strong>of</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS along<br />
the highways:<br />
(1) Health surveys along the highways may be carried out to assess the spread and<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> STD. It is important to prepare a health pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the truckers/cleaners and all<br />
those living along the highways. Health pr<strong>of</strong>ile will include the disease pattern;<br />
frequency; infected people; available health facilities; minimum distance to be<br />
covered for any health facility; etc. The analysis <strong>of</strong> data thus gathered will help in<br />
developing strategies in controlling the spread <strong>of</strong> the disease.<br />
(2) Awareness against STD or HIV/AIDS<br />
• Awareness creation on the spread <strong>of</strong> STD or HIV/AIDS especially among the<br />
frequent highway users is the most effective measure in controlling STDs. The<br />
awareness could be generated through Information-Education –<br />
Communication (IEC) materials. Before developing IEC materials, a strategy for<br />
awareness generation needs to be worked out including:<br />
• Identification <strong>of</strong> peer educators<br />
• Identification <strong>of</strong> target population other than truckers and crew members<br />
• Identification <strong>of</strong> location for displaying IEC materials<br />
• Coordinate with SACO NGOs<br />
• Coordinate with health department<br />
• Tie up with a willing private sector contributor<br />
• Once these issues are ironed out, emphasis will be on type <strong>of</strong> IEC materials viz.,<br />
• Audio<br />
• Audio-visual<br />
• Print material; and<br />
• Language<br />
• Once IEC materials are finalised implementers will have to finalise the approach<br />
viz.,<br />
• Group approach (road side shows; village shows; etc)<br />
• Door to door campaign, etc.<br />
(3)Awareness can also be generated through:<br />
(i) In-built curricula <strong>of</strong> schools and colleges<br />
(ii) By introducing behaviour change communication (BCC). BCC is based on the<br />
realization that communication as a process passes through different stages. Hence<br />
the communication has to be designed and carried out to the level <strong>of</strong> changing<br />
behaviour <strong>of</strong> the audience stand<br />
(iii) Peer education is important in IEC. Peers can help in creating awareness among<br />
target population. They could be <strong>of</strong> great help in BCC as well<br />
(iv) Involvement <strong>of</strong> NGOs could be <strong>of</strong> immense help in implementing the IEC strategy.<br />
International and national organizations working towards the control <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />
through IEC have engaged NGOs for addressing the issue<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 135
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
10.7. Recommended Actions<br />
Specific actions to be carried out for controlling the spread <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS/STD are the<br />
following:<br />
10.7.1. INFORMATION CAMPAIGN/ADVERTISEMENT<br />
10.7.1.1. Signage/Hoardings<br />
Suitable information materials should be designed to impart knowledge regarding<br />
STD/AIDS, the nature <strong>of</strong> their spread, control measures etc., among road users and<br />
truckers. Proper signage and hoarding are to be designed and displayed in suitable<br />
locations.<br />
10.7.1.2. Vehicle stickers<br />
Stickers on information related to STD/AIDS has to be designed highlighting use <strong>of</strong><br />
condoms, treatment facilities etc. In rest areas and in information booths the stickers<br />
should be kept and distributed to every truck parked there.<br />
10.7.1.3. Condom Vending machines<br />
Location: All the rest areas should have the provision <strong>of</strong> condom vending machines.<br />
Some people feel shy <strong>of</strong> using these machines in open public. To make these more<br />
effective, machines could be placed as an alternative to information booths, inside<br />
public toilet enclosures.<br />
10.7.2. CO-ORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES<br />
Co-ordination with agencies/organisations like State AIDS Control Society (SACS)<br />
working towards the cause <strong>of</strong> control and treatment <strong>of</strong> these diseases should be<br />
arranged. This would help the effort <strong>of</strong> the highway authorities to be more effective<br />
and efficient.<br />
10.7.3. CONSTRUCTION CAMP/REST AREAS/TRUCK LAY-BYES<br />
10.7.3.1. Provision <strong>of</strong> vending machines<br />
Along with rest areas, construction camp as well as truck lay-byes should also be<br />
provided with the facilities <strong>of</strong> condom vending through machines. In this case too,<br />
machines should be placed in not-so-public places in these areas.<br />
10.7.3.2. Advertisements<br />
Hoardings, danglers and signposts should be placed in these areas for imparting<br />
knowledge regarding these diseases and their control measures.<br />
10.7.3.3. Provision <strong>of</strong> medical check-up<br />
All the rest areas and construction camps should have the provision <strong>of</strong> medical<br />
facilities, especially meant for curing STD/AIDS. Free regular health camps are to be<br />
held in these areas for popularising the effort.<br />
10.7.4. PLAN FOR AWARENESS CAMPAIGN PREVENTION OF STD/AIDS<br />
10.7.4.1. Training Workshops and Seminars<br />
Training will involve organizing a series <strong>of</strong> workshops/ training on HIV/AIDS prevention<br />
measures targeting in the Road <strong>Project</strong> are (a) business communities (Construction and<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 136
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
transportation companies and) (b) resident communities particularly poor and minority<br />
people.<br />
• There could be three workshops <strong>of</strong> the project area in the first year and once a<br />
year thereafter.<br />
• Three workshops for contractors in the first year and once a year thereafter.<br />
• One annual workshop for business community over the 2-year implementation<br />
period.<br />
10.7.4.2. HIV/AIDS Information, Education & Communication<br />
The course that the AIDS pandemic will take in the next few years largely depends<br />
on successful Information Education and Communication strategies and<br />
programmes, well planned and effectively implemented to create not merely an<br />
informed and educated public but also a public motivated to adopt responsible<br />
sexual behaviour. Approaches may range from the use <strong>of</strong> mass media to inform or<br />
establish positive norms among the general population to the use <strong>of</strong> targeted<br />
interpersonal communication to help those at particular risk evaluate their own<br />
behaviour and develop new personal skills. Information Education and<br />
Communication activities may include designing and providing training in<br />
communication skills, carrying out research on audiences to determine what<br />
information is needed and the most effective way <strong>of</strong> delivering it, as well as<br />
designing and producing the materials to support activities.<br />
Overall, Information Education and Communication must be integrated with all<br />
existing HIV/AIDS prevention and care programmes as well as with on-going<br />
training services. For example, promotion <strong>of</strong> condom use or STD treatment among<br />
individuals with high risk behaviour will be effective only if condoms are also made<br />
accessible and STD treatment services are available.<br />
Similarly a positive social environment without discrimination and stigmatization will<br />
facilitate behavioural change. The general goal or Information Education and<br />
Communication is to promote and support appropriate changes in behaviour,<br />
especially among populations with high-risk behaviour, while cultural differences<br />
are likely to require different styles <strong>of</strong> presentation <strong>of</strong> materials between different<br />
target groups. AIDS education necessitates talking about sexual behaviour and<br />
methods <strong>of</strong> protection from HIV through sexual intercourse.<br />
10.7.4.3. Condoms distribution and supply<br />
To date, the only known method, barring abstinence, is condom use and therefore<br />
it has to be promoted.<br />
10.8. Administrative and Logistical Support on HIV/AIDS<br />
Since HIV/AIDS will be one <strong>of</strong> the major implementation concerns, the team in CMU will<br />
receive training/attained workshop on issues <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS to generate awareness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
issue and work towards its prevention. The RRO in CMU, under <strong>Project</strong> Director and<br />
Social Development Officer will coordinate/work with the NGO engaged for the<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 137
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>Project</strong> along with construction Supervision Consultant, contractor and State AIDS<br />
Control Society. Other Administrative and Logistical support services will be provided<br />
from the project.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 138
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 11 - INCOME RESTORATION<br />
11.1. Background<br />
Development project may cause an adverse impact on the income <strong>of</strong> projectaffected<br />
persons. It also has a negative impact on the socio- cultural systems <strong>of</strong><br />
affected communities. The basic postulates <strong>of</strong> all developmental activities should be<br />
that no one is worse <strong>of</strong> than before the project scenario. Restoration <strong>of</strong> pre-project<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> income is an important part <strong>of</strong> rehabilitating socioeconomic and cultural<br />
systems in affected communities. To achieve this goal, preparation <strong>of</strong> Income<br />
Restoration programmes under Rehabilitation Action Plan should be designed in<br />
consultation with the affected persons and they should explicitly approve the<br />
programme.<br />
11.2. Income Restoration Measures under R&R Policy<br />
The R&R policy has the following provisions for income restoration <strong>of</strong> those whose<br />
livelihood is getting affected:<br />
• Agricultural land and asset (titleholder) losing more than 20% <strong>of</strong> total holdings<br />
but remain more than MEH (5 bigha) is entitled for skill up-gradation training.<br />
Vulnerable PAP in this category will receive ERG amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 24,000.<br />
• Agricultural land and asset (titleholder) total holdings after acquisition fall below<br />
MEH (5 bigha) is entitled for transitional allowance at the rate <strong>of</strong> Rs. 70 per day<br />
for 24 days if land loss is less than 10% <strong>of</strong> the total holding, for 48 days if loss is<br />
between 10 to 20%, for 72 days if loss is between 20 to 50% and 100 days if loss is<br />
more than 50% <strong>of</strong> total holding. Provision <strong>of</strong> skill up-gradation training and able<br />
bodied PAPs will be given preference for employment with contractor for semi<br />
skilled / unskilled subject to fulfilling the requisite criteria / qualification.<br />
Vulnerable group will receive one-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant in the<br />
form <strong>of</strong> productive assets.<br />
• Commercial structure (titleholder) losing less than 20% and remain viable is<br />
entitled for One time grant <strong>of</strong> Rs, 1500 as Transitional allowance. If EP is<br />
displaced, he is entitled for a lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if within<br />
the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000 if outside the affected village or<br />
municipality or new destination is more than 2 Km, training for up-gradation <strong>of</strong><br />
skills and a plot <strong>of</strong> 25 sq. m on cost basis. All vulnerable EP’s loosing commercial<br />
structure shall be entitled for ERG in the form <strong>of</strong> productive assets. If such<br />
vulnerable EP is displaced, he shall also be entitled for 25 sqmt. <strong>of</strong> plot free <strong>of</strong><br />
cost, provided such EP is landless. However, if such EP owns land somewhere<br />
else and insists for plot, he will be provided 25 sqmt. plot on market price.<br />
• Commercial structure (tenant) is eligible for a lump sum rental allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />
3000 in rural areas and Rs. 6000 in urban areas, Lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs. 1000 if within the same village or municipality. Rs. 2000 if outside the<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 139
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
affected village or municipality or new destination is more than 2 Km, training for<br />
up-gradation <strong>of</strong> skills. Vulnerable EPs is entitled for one-time Economic<br />
Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong> productive assets.<br />
• If a person is losing source <strong>of</strong> Income (wage earning- Indirectly affected due to<br />
the employer being displaced), the Individual is entitled for grant equivalent to a<br />
lump sum transitional allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if associated for past three years<br />
continuously and training for up-gradation <strong>of</strong> skills. Vulnerable EPs is entitled for<br />
one-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong> productive assets.<br />
• Encroachers are eligible for training for skill up-gradation to EPs losing<br />
commercial activity. However, vulnerable encroachers are eligible for<br />
compensation <strong>of</strong> structure at replacement cost and one-time Economic<br />
Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong> productive assets to the Vulnerable EPs<br />
loosing commercial activities.<br />
• Squatters are eligible for compensation for loss <strong>of</strong> structure at replacement cost,<br />
a lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if within the same village or<br />
municipality. Rs. 2000 if outside the affected village or municipality or new<br />
destination is more than 2 Km, training for skill up-gradation to EPs losing<br />
commercial activity and one-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant in the form <strong>of</strong><br />
productive assets to the Vulnerable EPs loosing commercial activities.<br />
• Kiosk owner is entitled for lump sum shifting allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 300.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> vendor market if 50 or more vendors approached authority for a<br />
vendor market.<br />
11.3. Income Restoration Options Preferred By PAPs<br />
During the survey PAPs were specifically asked about their preference for rehabilitation<br />
in case they are affected / displaced by the proposed project. As table below shows,<br />
over 95 percent <strong>of</strong> the total affected PAFs opted for skill improvement training. This<br />
percentage is highest in Una – Nerchowk corridor followed by Mehatpur – Amb corridor<br />
with 97.11 percentages opting for training (table 11.1).<br />
Table 11.1: Training Options as Preferred by PAFs (Percentage)<br />
Corridor<br />
Training option opted by PAFs<br />
% to all PAFs opted for training % to PAFs in corridor<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 30.16% 97.11%<br />
Una - Nerchowk 54.94% 97.45%<br />
Theog - Rohru 12.03% 95.71%<br />
Total 97.13% 97.13%<br />
11.4. Inter-Agency Linkages for Income Restoration<br />
Majority <strong>of</strong> the eligible families for income restoration earn their livelihood through petty<br />
businesses or cultivation (primarily small and marginal), and therefore, it is imperative to<br />
ensure that the PAPs are able to reconstruct their livelihood. The NGOs engaged in the<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 140
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP will ensure that the PAPs are facilitated to minimise<br />
disruption to their social network and normal work pattern.<br />
For Income restoration, it is important that available skills with the PAPs is identified and<br />
further upgraded. During the survey, PAPs were specifically asked about the skill they<br />
posses other than the one related to their current occupation. However, none <strong>of</strong> the<br />
PAPs possessed any skill, which can be further upgraded through training. Hence, NGO<br />
contracted for implementation will have to conduct a survey among the PAPs with<br />
options <strong>of</strong> various skills related to the resource base <strong>of</strong> the area and available market<br />
and accordingly select trades for training. Based on the training, NGO will identify<br />
income-generating activities for sustainable economic opportunities. This would include<br />
establishing forward and backward linkages for marketing and credit facility. NGOs in<br />
consultation with the PAPs, Social development and LA <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> PWD, district<br />
administration and other stakeholders in Institutional financing and marketing<br />
federations will prepare micro-plans for IR activities.<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> upgrading agriculture productivity, the training on technical know-how will<br />
be arranged as per the choices <strong>of</strong> the target group population. In case <strong>of</strong> creation <strong>of</strong><br />
alternative livelihood schemes, felt needs <strong>of</strong> the target group population will be<br />
prioritized through people's participation. Further, these options will be tested for their<br />
viability against availability <strong>of</strong> skills, resource base <strong>of</strong> the area and available<br />
appropriate technology. Suitable alternative livelihood schemes will be chosen finally,<br />
where training on up-gradation, capital assistance, and linkages can be provided for<br />
making these pursuits sustainable for the beneficiaries or the target groups. The PAPs<br />
are required to participate in developing feasible long- term income generating<br />
schemes. The long- term options are expected to be developed during the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP and also supported by the government assistance.<br />
Various poverty alleviation schemes sponsored by government <strong>of</strong> India and<br />
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> (refer Annexure VIII) can be dovetailed by NGO for<br />
income restoration <strong>of</strong> PAPs. However, NGO must ensure sustainability <strong>of</strong> such schemes.<br />
11.5. Steps in Income Restoration<br />
Basic Information on IR activities <strong>of</strong> PAPs will be available from the census and<br />
socioeconomic surveys. Based on this information IR activities can be planned. IR<br />
activities are <strong>of</strong> two types:<br />
(1) Short term; and<br />
(2) Long term: The ensuing section describes both IR schemes.<br />
11.5.1. SHORT TERM IR ACTIVITIES<br />
Short term IR activities mean restoring PAPs' income during periods immediately before<br />
and after relocation. Such activities will focus on the following:<br />
Ensuring that adequate compensation is paid before relocation<br />
Relocation and transit allowances<br />
Providing short term, welfare based grants and allowances such as:<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 141
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• One time relocation allowance<br />
• Free transport to resettlement areas or assistance for transport<br />
• Free or subsidized items<br />
• Transitional allowances or grants until adequate income is generated,<br />
special allowances for vulnerable groups<br />
• With consideration <strong>of</strong> PAPs skills and needs, promoting PAP access to project<br />
related employment opportunities such as:<br />
• Work under the Main Investment <strong>Project</strong><br />
• Work on relocation teams (e.g., driver, food provision, etc.)<br />
• Work on resettlement sites, If any<br />
11.5.2. LONG TERM IR ACTIVITIES<br />
PAP should participate in developing a range <strong>of</strong> feasible long-term IR options. Long<br />
term options are affected by the scale <strong>of</strong> resettlement which may affect the feasibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> various non land based and land based IR options. The long-term options are either<br />
project financed or government financed. Therefore project <strong>of</strong>ficials will coordinate<br />
with government (district administration), Including tribal development and social<br />
welfare departments, to assure PAPs access to all schemes for Improving IR services.<br />
<strong>Project</strong> financed programmes should include a specific time frame for handing over<br />
the project to local administration at the end <strong>of</strong> a stipulated period. Availability and<br />
access to existing programmes should be sought for all PAPs. Long Term IR activities will<br />
be generated once the census surveys and consultation get over. IR activities will be<br />
generated in consultation with the community; mechanism to dovetail existing<br />
government poverty alleviation programmes will be developed in consultation with the<br />
community and <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> district administration and District Rural Development<br />
Agency (DRDA).<br />
11.6. Categories <strong>of</strong> Impacts<br />
<strong>Project</strong> induced displacement may lead to loss or diminished income or <strong>Project</strong><br />
Affected Person (PAPs). The main categories <strong>of</strong> impacts are as follows:<br />
• Loss <strong>of</strong> agriculture land in part or full<br />
• Loss <strong>of</strong> commercial establishments (permanent)<br />
• Loss <strong>of</strong> temporary commercial structure or mobile vendor (squatter)<br />
• Loss <strong>of</strong> livelihood (Commercial tenants-or helping hands, agriculture labours)<br />
<strong>Project</strong>s like road development involve acquiring linear strips <strong>of</strong> land: as such the<br />
impacts are not expected to be significant. However, mitigation measures need to be<br />
planned and implemented however insignificant the impacts may be. The best way to<br />
tackle loss <strong>of</strong> farmland in part or full is to help the concerned PAP to buy equivalent<br />
farmland in a nearby area using the land compensation received. Land for land has<br />
been found to be the best sustainable option for Income Restoration option only when<br />
a PAP has lost a significant amount <strong>of</strong> land; it would be Impossible to replace small<br />
strips <strong>of</strong> land. The compensation received can be deposited in blocked bank or post<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice accounts. The Interest accruing will supplement their income from other sources.<br />
The money can only be released for buying replacement land. It Is Important to see<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 142
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
that the compensation money is not blown away for consumption expenditure or<br />
paying <strong>of</strong>f loans especially for the vulnerable sections <strong>of</strong> PAPs - the more well <strong>of</strong>f can<br />
be exempted from this provision and direct paid in cash. The land compensation will<br />
be paid at market value and will be sufficient for buying replacement land. Loss <strong>of</strong><br />
Permanent Commercial Structure is a more complicated problem since the<br />
complementary issue <strong>of</strong> retaining the present customer base is to be simultaneously<br />
tackled. There is also the problem <strong>of</strong> tenants and owners since some <strong>of</strong> the structures<br />
being occupied by tenants. The required mitigation would involve re-constructing the<br />
commercial structures in an adjacent area so that the present customer base is<br />
retained. The ways and means <strong>of</strong> achieving this together with the ownership <strong>of</strong> the<br />
new structure also needs to be defined. While the project authority can acquire the<br />
required land and construct the structures for allotment, a more practical way would<br />
be to let the PAPs handle their own replacement structures with the guidance and<br />
support <strong>of</strong> the NGO. Regarding ownership, the status quo can be maintained i.e.<br />
ownership remains with the owner while the tenant occupies it. As in the previous case,<br />
the compensation money can be deposited in blocked bank accounts to be released<br />
only for constructing or buying the replacement structure. Since the construction<br />
involves different activities, the money can be released in four Instalments, colonizing<br />
with predetermined stages in the construction activity. Loss <strong>of</strong> commercial space (for<br />
temporary structures and mobile vendors) should be given utmost importance since<br />
this involves vulnerable sections <strong>of</strong> the PAPs. They also need to be given alternative<br />
space in an adjacent area for carrying on their trade or vocation. The temporary<br />
structure can be shifted to the new location and the mobile vendor can get stationed<br />
there.<br />
11.7. Basis for Identification <strong>of</strong> alternative IR Scheme<br />
Keeping in view the resource base <strong>of</strong> the EPs and also the socio-economic<br />
characteristics and preferences, HPRIDC and the NGO contracted for the<br />
implementation will have to chalk out individual IR schemes. The factors to be<br />
considered are:<br />
• Education level <strong>of</strong> PAPs<br />
• Skill possession<br />
• Economic activates in the post displacement period<br />
• Extent <strong>of</strong> land left<br />
• Extent <strong>of</strong> land purchased<br />
• Suitability <strong>of</strong> economic activity to supplement the income<br />
• Market potential and marketing facilities<br />
The best option is to allow the EP to continue its former occupation. However, during<br />
any development programme, occupations always change. The lists <strong>of</strong> possible IR<br />
options are given in table.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 143
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Table 11.2: Criteria for Alterative IR Schemes<br />
IR Option<br />
Requirement<br />
Land • PAPs are physically relocated and are primarily<br />
agriculturists<br />
• It is adequately available<br />
• There is transferable title<br />
• Land is <strong>of</strong> good quality<br />
• Land development needs can be covered by the project<br />
• PAPs are not exposed to market economics<br />
Cash • EP negatively impacted but not relocated<br />
• Land is unavailable in adequate quantity and quality<br />
• PAP prefer cash to land<br />
• Cash can be held in joint account<br />
• PAP's occupations are diverse<br />
• PAP exposed to cash economy<br />
• Interest ensuring deposits to be released when feasible IR<br />
activity is defined<br />
Small business • PAP familiar with cash<br />
• Demand for goods/services<br />
• Sustained capital and working capital Is available<br />
• There is local or project finance and capacity to provide<br />
training<br />
• Business builds on/uses existing skill <strong>of</strong> the PAP<br />
• Local markets are not adversely affected by project<br />
activities<br />
Continue previous<br />
employment<br />
• Reasonable time and money required for access to<br />
employment from new sites<br />
• Employment <strong>Project</strong> assistance for previous and/or<br />
maintenance <strong>of</strong> other facilities<br />
Preference for • Work is available in main investment project<br />
PAPs Employment • Clear eligibility criteria are established<br />
• PAPs are linked to existing government job programmes by<br />
reserving certain percentage <strong>of</strong> government jobs for PAPs<br />
• There is a good coordination between project and<br />
government<br />
The PAPs will participate in developing a range <strong>of</strong> feasible long-term Income<br />
Restoration schemes. These will be developed during the implementation <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
and would be financed by project. PWD will work with NGO and liaison with the district<br />
administration to dovetail government's poverty alleviation schemes. The micro plans<br />
developed by the implementing authority will indicate the type <strong>of</strong> scheme each finely<br />
has opted. The grants received for economic rehabilitation will be used for purchase <strong>of</strong><br />
assets. The EPs will receive training for acquisition <strong>of</strong> new skills or up-gradation <strong>of</strong> old<br />
skills for the activity selected by them.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 144
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
11.8. Non Land Based IR Schemes<br />
Since land is scarce and not all PAPs are agriculturists, non-land based IR schemes<br />
becomes all the more important. The non-land based IR schemes could -be:<br />
11.8.1. ALLIED AGRICULTURE ACTIVITIES<br />
Under cared agriculture activities, various IR options are available viz., dairy, Poultry,<br />
goatery, sheep rearing, piggery, etc. PAPs who are agriculturist can take up any <strong>of</strong><br />
these options. These will require training, which can be imparted by Khadi & Village<br />
Industries Commission (KVIC) / District Dairy Development Authority (DDDA) and milk<br />
collection can be extended by local milk federation.<br />
11.8.2. PETTY TRADERS<br />
Under this scheme, the available options are grocery shop, vegetable & fruit shop, -<br />
stationary, clothes, tea & snacks, ready-made garments, beetle shop etc. PAPs those<br />
who are already in the trade and business are suitable for these activities.<br />
Implementing NGO will have to decide on type <strong>of</strong> shops to be established as per<br />
demand.<br />
11.8.3. SKILL RELATED SCHEMES<br />
The options available under this scheme are tailoring, carpentry, masonry, gold smith,<br />
black smith, motor winding, cycle/motor cycle/auto repair, driving<br />
(auto/Matador/etc.), Television/Tape records/Watch repairing, Pottery, Leather works<br />
etc. PAPs those who are in such trades can undergo training for skill up-gradation to<br />
supplement their annual Income. District Industries Centre or Khadi Village Industries<br />
Board/Commission or Industrial Training Institutes are imparts training in such trades.<br />
Training can also be imparted through pr<strong>of</strong>essional and competent outside agency<br />
especially hired for the purpose.<br />
11.8.4. OTHERS<br />
Others primarily include loan for various agriculture implements to increase productivity<br />
viz., pump sets, dug well, bore well, bullock cart, etc. PAPs those who are into<br />
agriculture and do not have any Irrigation facilities can avail such loans. Such loans are<br />
given by bank after District Rural Development Authority processes the applications.<br />
The Implementation <strong>of</strong> above-mentioned activities requires organization <strong>of</strong> credit<br />
camps. Extending financial credit support is an important component <strong>of</strong> non-land<br />
based IR schemes. It requires organization <strong>of</strong> credit camps for EPs, Local government<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials, NGOs and PAP representatives apart from HPRIDC/PWD <strong>of</strong>ficials will attend<br />
these camps. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the camps would be to allow local financial institutions to<br />
inform participants <strong>of</strong> credit options and how to avoid procedural delays. All formalities<br />
related to processing <strong>of</strong> applications for credit assistance will be completed at these<br />
camps. For these kinds <strong>of</strong> camps HPRIDC/PWD along with NGO, will have to coordinate<br />
closely with the Lead Bank managers and other commercial banks operating in the<br />
district.<br />
11.9. Training<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the strategies for economic sustenance <strong>of</strong> the PAPs is to help them improve<br />
their production level or to Impart new skills/up-gradation <strong>of</strong> the existing skills through<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 145
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
training. As quite a significant number <strong>of</strong> PAPs are dependent on agriculture and others<br />
have low skill endowment, training becomes an important component <strong>of</strong> IR. For PAPs<br />
who intend to diversify their economic activity, suitable income restoration schemes will<br />
be identified on individual basis and training need would be assessed. Besides training<br />
in scheme specific skills, general entrepreneurship development will also form part <strong>of</strong><br />
the training programme, mainly to improve the management capabilities <strong>of</strong> EP. The<br />
Training will be organized in the plan period itself. The NGO contracted for the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> RAP will be assigned this task. Besides, the trainings are regularly<br />
conducted by District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) through its programme<br />
names Training <strong>of</strong> Rural Youths for Self Employment (RYSEM). Training programmes<br />
organized by other' government agencies will also be availed. The post deviances<br />
have shown that roughly three fourth <strong>of</strong> the PAPs require training. It will be the<br />
responsibility <strong>of</strong> the PWD to ensure that PAPs receives, training in desired trade. The<br />
NGO contracted will act as a facilitator and training will be imparted either by the<br />
government agencies such as DIC, KVIC, ITDA etc. or a pr<strong>of</strong>essional and competent<br />
outside agency. The local Industrial Training Institutes (lTIs) can be approached for<br />
training.<br />
11.10. Institutions<br />
The Institutions for IR schemes include PWD, local government staff, NGO and PAP<br />
groups. The various line departments featuring in distribution <strong>of</strong> loan cum subsidy and<br />
training will issue specific government resolution (GR) or government order (GO) to that<br />
effect. However, <strong>Government</strong> run schemes do not provide sufficient working capital.<br />
Therefore project should consider special allocations for that purpose and the ESMU<br />
should develop strong links with local government development agencies by involving<br />
them in while planning <strong>of</strong> IR scheme for PAPs.<br />
11.11. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> IR Schemes<br />
The monitoring <strong>of</strong> IR schemes will be carried out along with the monitoring <strong>of</strong> other<br />
components <strong>of</strong> RAP internally by the ESMU. The monitoring will be carried out based on<br />
economic Indicators. An evaluation will be conducted at the end <strong>of</strong> the RAP<br />
implementation by an outside agency to assess the outcome and effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
various IR schemes adopted in the project. The findings <strong>of</strong> the evaluation <strong>of</strong> Phase I<br />
and good examples will be carried forward in Phase II <strong>of</strong> HPSRP.<br />
11.12. Plan for Income Restoration<br />
After completing the all necessary ground activities, the NGO will prepare income<br />
restoration plan for PAPs based on its field observations and survey outcome. The<br />
income restoration plan shall be discussed with the respective PAP and the<br />
department prior to execution.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 146
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 12 - IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGENEBTS & SCHEDULE<br />
12.1. Background<br />
Planning, surveying, assessing, policy development, institutional identification,<br />
participation, income restoration and implementation are typical activities <strong>of</strong> RAP.<br />
While these activities have discrete components that can be put on a time line, there is<br />
a close inter relationship <strong>of</strong> each activity to the whole implementation. The breakdown<br />
<strong>of</strong> each activity according to a specific time frame has been provided in the<br />
Implementation Schedule. It is further cautioned that specific situation may require an<br />
increase in time, allotted to a task. Such situations may be caused due to many factors<br />
such as local opposition, seasonal factors, social and economic concerns, training <strong>of</strong><br />
support staff and financial constraints. Implementation Schedule will require detailed<br />
coordination between the project authorities and various line departments.<br />
Implementation plan has been spread over a period <strong>of</strong> two years in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong> (HPSRP). A simplified summary <strong>of</strong> the operational<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> the implementation plan will be prepared when the project starts. It will be<br />
given to HPRIDC, who along with the selected NGOs will have to translate the plan into<br />
action.<br />
12.2. Implementation Procedure<br />
The implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP will consist <strong>of</strong> four major stages:<br />
• Identification <strong>of</strong> cut-<strong>of</strong>f date and notification for land acquisition as per Land<br />
Acquisition Act, 1894 (thereafter land will be purchased). For non-title holders the<br />
cut <strong>of</strong>f date for each corridor shall be as:<br />
Corridor name<br />
Cut <strong>of</strong>f Date<br />
Mehatpur - Amb 26-08-2006<br />
Una – Nerchowk 07-11-2006<br />
Theog - Rohru 14-11-2006<br />
• Verification <strong>of</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> EPs and estimation <strong>of</strong> their type and level <strong>of</strong> losses<br />
• Preparation <strong>of</strong> list <strong>of</strong> EPs for relocation/rehabilitation<br />
• Relocation and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> the EPs<br />
12.3. Timing <strong>of</strong> Resettlement<br />
The resettlement process must be completed by the start <strong>of</strong> civil works on the particular<br />
corridor. Requisite procedure will be developed by the HPRIDC to carry out<br />
resettlement <strong>of</strong> PAPs located within the CoI, before the civil work starts on any section<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project road. The affected people will be given at least four months notice to<br />
vacate their property before civil works begins. Stretches, which are free <strong>of</strong><br />
encroachment and other encumbrances, will be handed over first to the contractor.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 147
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
12.4. Miscellaneous Activities<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous activities need to be carried out during the implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project and some <strong>of</strong> the miscellaneous important activities include diversion <strong>of</strong><br />
traffic during construction and leasing borrow areas by contractors. The steps for<br />
undertaking the miscellaneous activities include:<br />
Diversion route:<br />
• Preparing plans with details <strong>of</strong> land required for diversion<br />
• Compensation decided in mutual agreement and paid before physical<br />
possession<br />
• Returning <strong>of</strong> land after restoration in original condition.<br />
Borrow Areas:<br />
• Submit details to HPRIDC about the persons and area to be leased in by<br />
the contractor<br />
• The contract document signed between the HPRIDC and the contractor<br />
will include the terms <strong>of</strong> payment and return the land to the owner<br />
• Complete payments will be made to the contractor after the HPRIDC is<br />
satisfied that the terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> the contract document have<br />
been met.<br />
12.5. Implementation Responsibility<br />
It is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the HPRIDC to ensure that the RAP is successfully implemented<br />
in a time bound manner. The implementation plan <strong>of</strong> RAP for a specific route will be<br />
prepared by the HPRIDC. The supervision, reporting and co-ordination process in the<br />
RAP implementation is presented in flow chart below.<br />
HPRIDC<br />
ESMU - PD<br />
Flow chart depicting the<br />
supervision, reporting<br />
and coordination<br />
process in RAP<br />
implementation<br />
EMU SMU CSC<br />
EO-CMU<br />
RRO-CMU<br />
Contractor<br />
NGO<br />
Supervision Reporting Co-ordination<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 148
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
HPRIDC will be assisted by the partnering NGO selected for implementation. The<br />
implementation schedule proposed will be updated as the implementation progresses.<br />
Position/ agency<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Director<br />
Social Development Officer<br />
Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer<br />
Kannongo (Nayab Tehsildar)<br />
Non – <strong>Government</strong>al Organisation<br />
Grievance Redress Committee<br />
Responsibilities<br />
Co-ordination <strong>of</strong> all activities <strong>of</strong> ESMU with<br />
HPRIDC and other government agencies.<br />
Will be holding review meeting every<br />
month.<br />
Report to Head, ESMU; Will collate reports<br />
form field, monitor progress, prepare<br />
monthly reports, catalyst between field<br />
staff and head <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />
Report to Social Development Officer,<br />
SMU; Will collate reports form field, monitor<br />
progress, prepare monthly reports, catalyst<br />
between field staff and SMU <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />
Monitor and Co-ordinate with NGO in<br />
implementing PAP on field. Participate in<br />
grievance redress committee.<br />
Will deal with the land acquisition aspect,<br />
report to <strong>Project</strong> Director and Social<br />
Development Officer about the progress<br />
<strong>of</strong> the LA activities, co-ordination with the<br />
district revenue authorities, distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
compensation, participation in grievance<br />
redress committee in matter related to LA<br />
issues.<br />
Will be grass root level worker interfacing<br />
with PAP; develop rapport with the PAPs;<br />
conduct a sample survey among them,<br />
help in skill up-gradation, facilitate<br />
purchase <strong>of</strong> land for PAPs, help in<br />
negotiation, help PAPs in obtaining<br />
benefits under entitlement framework and<br />
appropriate government schemes, help in<br />
creating awareness among truckers on<br />
highways and design methods / measures<br />
prevention <strong>of</strong> same.<br />
Provide support to Entitled Persons (EPs) on<br />
problems arising out <strong>of</strong> LA/property,<br />
prioritise cases for which support is to be<br />
given, keep the EPs appraised about the<br />
development and inform HPRIDC <strong>of</strong><br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 149
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Position/ agency<br />
Responsibilities<br />
serious cases within an appropriate time<br />
frame.<br />
District Level Committee<br />
Will address the grievances referred to it<br />
by the GRC for amicable solution.<br />
Arbitrator The grievances unresolved after the<br />
district level committee shall be put to the<br />
arbitrator for arriving at a consensus.<br />
Impact Evaluation consultant<br />
Mid Term and End Term evaluation <strong>of</strong> RAP<br />
Implementation<br />
12.6. Community Participation in the Implementation <strong>of</strong> RAP<br />
The institutional arrangement as explained in R&R policy already provides the<br />
continued involvement <strong>of</strong> the communities, especially the project-affected and the<br />
project-displaced persons in implementation <strong>of</strong> the RAP. In view <strong>of</strong> this, to ensure<br />
community participation during the implementation <strong>of</strong> RAP, the HPRIDC will take the<br />
following precautionary steps:<br />
• The stakeholders are consulted at every stage <strong>of</strong> project<br />
• The women perception is built into the RAP implementation plan<br />
• The host community is consulted so that community assets are optimised and<br />
enhanced<br />
• The PAPs participate in ensuring creation <strong>of</strong> community assets, and the upkeep<br />
and maintenance <strong>of</strong> assets created by the project<br />
• An institutional mechanism is evolved involving the people, the gram<br />
Panchayats and the formal and informal peoples’ committees to ensure<br />
sustainability <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> development, beyond the RAP implementation<br />
period.<br />
12.7. Tasks for NGO in Implementation<br />
The role <strong>of</strong> NGOs in the RAP implementation is very crucial and it has been <strong>of</strong>ten seen<br />
that the involvement <strong>of</strong> a credible NGO in the RAP implementation results in successful<br />
resettlement and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> the affected persons. Therefore, from the very<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> association <strong>of</strong> the NGO, the specific tasks <strong>of</strong> the NGO and the<br />
corresponding Methods to be followed should be prescribed. In this exercise, an<br />
attempt has been made to identify some <strong>of</strong> the important tasks to be carried out by<br />
the NGO involved for the RAP implementation and the corresponding methodology to<br />
be adopted for successful carrying out the tasks, the details <strong>of</strong> which is given in the<br />
shape <strong>of</strong> a checklist below:<br />
• Developing Rapport with the PAPs<br />
• Developing Rapport with the <strong>Project</strong> Authorities particularly the Social<br />
Officer<br />
• The need for Land Acquisition<br />
• The need for eviction <strong>of</strong> Squatters & Encroachers<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 150
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
• The likely consequences <strong>of</strong> the project on the communities economic<br />
livelihood<br />
• Identifying PAPs & verifying on the basis <strong>of</strong> census survey carried out<br />
• Distribution <strong>of</strong> R&R policy and entitlement packages<br />
• Assist PAPs in getting the compensation for their land and properties<br />
acquired for the project<br />
• In consultation with HPRIDC & Revenue Dept. help PAPs identify suitable<br />
land for relocation and for agricultural purposes & assist in negotiating its<br />
transfer to the PAPs & in case suitable <strong>Government</strong> land is unavailable<br />
then assist PAP to locate a land owner willing to dispose and assist in the<br />
negotiation <strong>of</strong> the purchase price<br />
• Determination <strong>of</strong> the entitlements <strong>of</strong> each PAP by reviewing the R&R<br />
Policy and the RAP<br />
• Assisting the PAP in coming to some agreement & if need be pursuing the<br />
matter through grievance redress cell<br />
• In close consultation with PAPs for ensuring acceptability help project<br />
authorities in making arrangements for smooth relocation <strong>of</strong> the PAPs and<br />
their business<br />
• Advising PAPs on best use <strong>of</strong> grants under the R&R package ensuring<br />
sustainability <strong>of</strong> income<br />
• Investigation <strong>of</strong> the availability <strong>of</strong> various Govt. development<br />
programmes and examining their relative merits for recommending the<br />
same to the PAPs and accordingly orchestrate training programmes for<br />
sustainable livelihood <strong>of</strong> PAPs and assisting in required skill development<br />
by networking with Revenue department, other <strong>Government</strong><br />
departments and NGOs <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
• Helping PAPs in redress <strong>of</strong> their grievances by awareness generation<br />
amongst PAPs on grievance redress mechanism as per RAP & assisting<br />
PAPs with grievances for its mitigation<br />
• Developing Micro level plans for R&R in consultation with the PAPs and<br />
the Social Development Officer ensuring PAPs agreement on List <strong>of</strong><br />
options open & choices made by PAPs upon being assisted to do so<br />
• Relocation site<br />
• List <strong>of</strong> benefits due to the PAP<br />
• Arrangement for Shifting<br />
• Proposed utilisation <strong>of</strong> grant moneys due to PAPs<br />
• Involvement <strong>of</strong> PAPs in existing Govt. development programmes<br />
• Updating the data bank on PAPs due to any changes in project &<br />
development <strong>of</strong> impact indicators<br />
• Specific assignments from the Social Development Officer for the welfare<br />
<strong>of</strong> the affected community<br />
• Assisting in identifying tree species selected by the community and<br />
facilitates its plantation.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 151
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
12.8. Status <strong>of</strong> RAP implementation preparation<br />
HPRIDC has already stated the RAP implementation preparation process well in<br />
advance to avoid any delay in awarding civil contract and in the process the following<br />
pre implementation tasks have been completed or in progress.<br />
Activities<br />
Appointment <strong>of</strong> Social Development Officer<br />
Setting up <strong>of</strong> CMU<br />
Appointment <strong>of</strong> Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer<br />
Appointment <strong>of</strong> NGO<br />
Mobilisation <strong>of</strong> NGO<br />
Notification <strong>of</strong> section 4 under LA Act<br />
Notification <strong>of</strong> section 6 under LA Act<br />
Training <strong>of</strong> CMU staff in R&R<br />
Setting up <strong>of</strong> Grievance redress committee<br />
Setting up <strong>of</strong> District Level committee<br />
Status<br />
Completed<br />
In progress<br />
In progress<br />
Completed<br />
Completed<br />
Completed for major part<br />
In progress<br />
Not started<br />
Process initiated<br />
Process initiated<br />
12.9. Implementation Schedule<br />
The period for implementation <strong>of</strong> RP has been taken as 24 months. However,<br />
monitoring and evaluation will continue beyond the period <strong>of</strong> implementation.<br />
Planning, surveying, assessing, policy development, institution identification, AP<br />
participation, income restoration and implementation are typical RP related activities,<br />
which have been considered. However, sometimes the sequence may change or<br />
delays witnessed due to circumstances beyond the control <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Project</strong>. The RP<br />
Implementation is given in table 12.1.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 152
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
1 Review <strong>of</strong> RAP<br />
Table 12.1: RAP Implementation Schedule: Activities in Months<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Total<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
Study design drawings & procurement <strong>of</strong> survey<br />
1<br />
questionnaire from DPR Consultant 1<br />
Follow up <strong>of</strong> peg marking/demarcation <strong>of</strong> road<br />
2<br />
boundaries 2<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> corridor <strong>of</strong> impact (CoI) required for the<br />
2<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Implementation Unit(PIU) 2<br />
5 Verification <strong>of</strong> PAPs & PDPs<br />
6 Updating <strong>of</strong> the PAPs & PDPs<br />
7 Finalization <strong>of</strong> the PAPs & PDPs list i/c CPRs<br />
8 Joint Account Opening (PIU &/or Organization)<br />
9 Categorization <strong>of</strong> the PAPs<br />
10<br />
Identification & Verification <strong>of</strong> Non-Titleholders<br />
PAPs & intial consultation sessions, & submission<br />
<strong>of</strong> updated data on PAPs & review <strong>of</strong> the same by<br />
the Social Welfare Officer<br />
11 Marking <strong>of</strong> the structure/asset on ground<br />
12 Measurement & Valuation <strong>of</strong> structure/assets<br />
13 Distribution <strong>of</strong> R&R policy<br />
14 Preparation <strong>of</strong> Micro Plans-NTHs<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
3<br />
2<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 153
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
15<br />
Table 12.1: RAP Implementation Schedule: Activities in Months<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Total<br />
Incorporate suggestions from PIU/HPRIDC<br />
1<br />
Corporate/M&E Consultant 1<br />
16 Finalisation <strong>of</strong> Micro Plans for Non-Title Holders<br />
1<br />
1<br />
17<br />
Submission & approval from District Level<br />
1<br />
Committee(DLC) 1<br />
18 Distribution <strong>of</strong> Identity cards-NTHs<br />
19 Physical verification <strong>of</strong> title holders(THs)<br />
20 Finalisation <strong>of</strong> Micro Plans forTitle Holders(TH)<br />
21 Distribution <strong>of</strong> identity cards-THs<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
Grievance redressal and hearing <strong>of</strong> objection<br />
after 4 notification<br />
Awareness <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDs, child labour and women<br />
issues<br />
Access & conduct livelihood programmes,<br />
capacity building etc.<br />
25 Distribution <strong>of</strong> compensation/Assistance<br />
1<br />
1<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
7<br />
12<br />
13<br />
3<br />
3<br />
26<br />
Identification <strong>of</strong> relocation <strong>of</strong> sites for private<br />
assets/Community Property Resources(CPRs)<br />
2<br />
2<br />
27 Submission <strong>of</strong> Micro Plans for CPRs<br />
28 Approval <strong>of</strong> Micro Plans for CPRs<br />
3<br />
3<br />
1<br />
1<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 154
Resettlement Action Plan Report (Phase I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Table 12.1: RAP Implementation Schedule: Activities in Months<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Total<br />
3<br />
29 Relocation <strong>of</strong> private structures<br />
3<br />
30 Relocation <strong>of</strong> CPRs<br />
4<br />
3<br />
31<br />
32<br />
Consultation-individual/village level/focus group<br />
discussions<br />
Liaison with CRRO/HPRIDC<br />
corporate/DLCs/Grievance Redress<br />
Cells/Training Institutions/Other <strong>Government</strong><br />
Agencies (health, rural development, child labour,<br />
etc.)<br />
18<br />
24<br />
33 Deployment and Withdrawal Plan 4<br />
34<br />
Documentation-photography, videography,<br />
minutes <strong>of</strong> meeting, etc.<br />
35 Reports<br />
a) Inception Report<br />
b) Monthly Reports<br />
c) Quarterly Reports<br />
d) Completion Report<br />
*<br />
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br />
* * * * * *<br />
*<br />
24<br />
1<br />
24<br />
6<br />
1<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 155
Resettlement Action Plan Report Phase I (Priority I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 13 – BUDGET<br />
13.1. Introduction<br />
This chapter presents a consolidated overview <strong>of</strong> the budget and the cost estimates.<br />
The cost estimates for land and structures are based on data collected during the<br />
survey and contingency provisions have been made to take into account variations<br />
from this data. The compensation amount for the acquisition <strong>of</strong> land and structures will<br />
be determined by the Competent Authority appointed under LA Act. Over and above<br />
this, EPs will be entitled for R&R assistance as per the entitlement framework given in<br />
Chapter 3.<br />
The budget is indicative <strong>of</strong> outlays for the different expenditure categories and is<br />
calculated at the 2006 price index. These costs will be updated and adjusted to the<br />
inflation rate as the project continues and during implementation.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the features <strong>of</strong> this cost estimate are outlined below:<br />
• Agricultural land will be compensated at replacement value based on the<br />
methods given in the entitlement framework.<br />
• Compensation for structures at replacement value to legal titleholders and<br />
to squatters/encroachers, assisted by the NGO.<br />
13.2. Unit Costs - Value <strong>of</strong> Land<br />
Compensation for land has been worked out after extensive survey <strong>of</strong> the PAPs,<br />
verification <strong>of</strong> market rates from local people and government rates prevalent in this<br />
region. The rates are calculated in the following manner:<br />
For bypasses, mostly private property will be acquired, thus a detailed rate analysis was<br />
undertaken whereby an authorized evaluator made verification <strong>of</strong> market rates from<br />
local people (based on land transactions done in the area in last years) and provided<br />
with a replacement value <strong>of</strong> the land. Also, the government-registered price was<br />
ascertained from registry papers. The <strong>Government</strong> registered price was taken as the<br />
price at which the acquisition <strong>of</strong> government land would be done.<br />
13.3 Titleholder Agricultural Land loss and Replacement Value<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> widening, a total <strong>of</strong> 28.48 ha <strong>of</strong> agricultural land will be acquired. The<br />
market value <strong>of</strong> the land has been assessed by the consultants based on public<br />
consultation, discussion with the local revenue department, local PWD <strong>of</strong>ficials. There is<br />
no declared government price available in the state. The discussion with various<br />
sources reveals that the land price on Mehatpur – Amb road is in the range <strong>of</strong> rupees<br />
10 million to 10.25 million per hectare. The price on Una – Nerchowk road s in the range<br />
<strong>of</strong> rupees 7.5 million to 10.10 million and the same o Rohru – Theog is in the range <strong>of</strong><br />
rupees 5 million to 7.5 million. Thus, the unit rate per hectare considered to Rs. 8 million.<br />
This rate has been used to calculate the replacement value <strong>of</strong> the land. An additional<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 151
Resettlement Action Plan Report Phase I (Priority I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
30% <strong>of</strong> has been taken as solatium over and above the compensation, in consideration<br />
<strong>of</strong> the compulsory nature <strong>of</strong> acquisition.<br />
13.4 Titleholder Non-agricultural Land Loss and Replacement Value<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 16245.55 Sq. mt. <strong>of</strong> residential and commercial land will be acquired in all.<br />
The market value <strong>of</strong> the land has been assessed by the consultants based on public<br />
consultation, consultation with revenue department and local PWD <strong>of</strong>ficials. The<br />
replacement value <strong>of</strong> the land has been calculated at the rate <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000/-per sq. mt.<br />
An additional 30% <strong>of</strong> has been taken as solatium over and above the compensation, in<br />
consideration <strong>of</strong> compulsory nature <strong>of</strong> acquisition.<br />
13.5 Value <strong>of</strong> Structures<br />
For the loss <strong>of</strong> structures, either commercial or residential, the titleholders, squatters and<br />
vulnerable encroachers will be compensated at replacement cost as per the policy.<br />
Data about different materials used in the structure have been calculated during<br />
structure identification survey in the project area. The replacement costs for the<br />
structure are based on the updated rate <strong>of</strong> state PWD and on the basis <strong>of</strong> this rate the<br />
state government approves the tender. Thus the BSR rate reflects not only the market<br />
rate but competitive enough for the contracting industry to bid for various government<br />
jobs. The rate has been considered on higher side due to various reasons in <strong>Himachal</strong><br />
<strong>Pradesh</strong> such as hill cutting and extra foundation cost on valley side. The average rate<br />
for permanent structures has been calculated @Rs. 3000m 2 , the semi-permanent<br />
structure has been calculated @ Rs. 2400m 2 and temporary structures has been<br />
calculated at the rate <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000m 2 .<br />
13.6 Religious Structure<br />
The religious structures located along the road within the COI will be relocated in<br />
consultation with the community and at a place chosen by the community. The<br />
religious structures are <strong>of</strong> different size and quality construction. However, it is seen in<br />
the past that the community bargain at the time <strong>of</strong> relocation to get better and bigger<br />
size structure. Therefore, a lump sum amount per structure has been considered which<br />
includes some amount <strong>of</strong> beatification by way <strong>of</strong> plantation etc. Thus, the cost <strong>of</strong><br />
shifting <strong>of</strong> a shrine / temple was estimated at Rs 1, 25,000.<br />
13.7 Other Utilities<br />
13.7.1. HAND PUMPS<br />
The cost <strong>of</strong> hand pumps found along the roads was collected from the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong><br />
Superintending Engineer, IPHD, Shimla. The cost <strong>of</strong> hand pump differs depending upon<br />
the location and rock strata in the location. Thus the average cost per hand pump has<br />
been considered Rs. 100000/-.<br />
13.7.2. WELL<br />
The cost <strong>of</strong> well found along the roads was collected from the local sources. The cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> well differs depending upon the location and rock strata in the location. The cost <strong>of</strong><br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 152
Resettlement Action Plan Report Phase I (Priority I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
well in Mehatpur – Amb road is less than Una-Nerchowk. Thus the average cost per well<br />
has been considered Rs. 100000/-.<br />
13.7.3. WATER TAP<br />
There are public water taps found along the road and cost per point, platform drain<br />
and a sock pit has been kept Rs. 5000/-.<br />
13.7.4. WATER TANK<br />
The cost <strong>of</strong> water tank found along the road has been considered Rs. 5000/-. These<br />
small size tanks are <strong>of</strong> brick masonry with concrete slab on top <strong>of</strong> it.<br />
13.7.5. PLATFORM<br />
The platform around religious trees is very common in <strong>Himachal</strong>. The cost per cubic mt.<br />
has been considered Rs. 1600/-.<br />
13.7.6. TREES<br />
Some individual trees are also getting affected on private property. The owners<br />
themselves estimated the cost <strong>of</strong> the trees. The cost <strong>of</strong> trees varies between Rs 1000 to<br />
Rs 6000, depending upon the species, type <strong>of</strong> tree, maturity and productivity. Therefore<br />
an average figure <strong>of</strong> Rs 3500 per tree has been considered.<br />
13.8. Assistance for Squatters and Encroachers<br />
Compensation for loss <strong>of</strong> structure at replacement cost to vulnerable person @CSR <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> PWD.<br />
13.9. Shifting Allowance<br />
It is estimated that moving costs will be Rs 1,000 for within same village or municipality<br />
and Rs 2,000 for shifting destination more than 2km. Shifting allowance is one time<br />
grant.<br />
13.10. Training for Up-gradation <strong>of</strong> Skill<br />
The amount used to estimate the budget for training has been calculated based on<br />
DRDA norms: -<br />
Head <strong>of</strong> Cost per<br />
Cost for month in Rupees<br />
participants One Three Four<br />
Institutional training cost 450 1350 1800<br />
Participants lodging and 750 2250 3000<br />
boarding cost/ Participants<br />
travel cost*<br />
Trainer cost 200 600 800<br />
Raw material cost 100 300 400<br />
Total 1500 4500 6000<br />
* Participants provided with lodging & boarding in the institute shall not receive travel cost or vice versa.<br />
Source: DRDA web site for skill up-gradation training under SGSY<br />
The average period <strong>of</strong> training for skill up-gradation varies from one month to six month.<br />
However, in this project a period <strong>of</strong> three months has been considered for each<br />
participant. The total expenditure on basic orientation and skill development training<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 153
Resettlement Action Plan Report Phase I (Priority I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
per trainee has been considered Rupees 4000/- per month keeping in view that some<br />
skill improvement training may need less than three month. Training provided to eligible<br />
EP will be as per their choice for skill up-gradation. Vulnerable group PAPs will be given<br />
preference for this support. Training will be provided under District Rural Development<br />
Agency (DRDA) scheme <strong>of</strong> TRYSEM.<br />
13.11. Transitional Allowance<br />
The transitional allowance for PAPs losing agriculture land to be calculated at the rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> Rs. 70 per day for 24 days if land loss is less than 10% <strong>of</strong> the total holding, for 48 days if<br />
loss is between 10 to 20%, for 72 days if loss is between 20 to 50% and 100 days if loss is<br />
more than 50% <strong>of</strong> total holding. For PAPs losing non-agriculture land and assets the<br />
allowance has been calculated at Rs. 1500. This will be one time payment.<br />
13.12. Rental Allowance<br />
A lump sum Rental allowance has been calculated Rs. 3000 in rural areas and Rs. 6000<br />
in urban areas.<br />
13.13. Economical Rehabilitation Grant<br />
Economic rehabilitation grant for vulnerable EPs has been calculated based on BPL cut<br />
<strong>of</strong>f line <strong>of</strong> the state. The yearly figure will be converted into monthly amount. An<br />
addition <strong>of</strong> 25% over and above the cut <strong>of</strong>f line will ensure that inflation rate is also<br />
taken care <strong>of</strong>. Therefore, ERG amount is Rs. 24,000.<br />
13.14. Resettlement Sites<br />
The R&R policy includes the provision <strong>of</strong> resettlement sites complete with all basic<br />
amenities. As the potential size <strong>of</strong> the resettlement sites will be small, a lot <strong>of</strong> site<br />
development cost may be minimized by careful location <strong>of</strong> the resettlement sites. Site<br />
development will be required in case 50 commercial and 25 residential PDPs opt for it.<br />
The resettlement choices opted by the majority PDPs is in favour <strong>of</strong> self relocation;<br />
however, a lump sum budget has been kept in the project.<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> R&R budget for Phase I roads item wise and combined total are given below<br />
in table 13.1 and 13.2.<br />
13.1: Item wise estimated budget for RAP implementation<br />
Type Item Entitlement Unit Quantity Rate in<br />
Rs.<br />
Land<br />
Acquisition<br />
Acquisition <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural land<br />
Cost in Rs.<br />
Replacement cost. Hect. 47.06 8000000 376480000<br />
Acquisition <strong>of</strong><br />
residential/commercial<br />
land<br />
Replacement cost. Sq. mt. 16246 1000 16246000<br />
Solatium @30%<br />
In consideration <strong>of</strong><br />
117817800<br />
compulsory nature <strong>of</strong><br />
acquisition as per LA<br />
Act<br />
Interest @ 12% 61265256<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 154
Resettlement Action Plan Report Phase I (Priority I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Type Item Entitlement Unit Quantity Rate in<br />
Rs.<br />
Structure<br />
Acquisition<br />
Acquisition <strong>of</strong> pucca<br />
structure<br />
Cost in Rs.<br />
replacement value Sq. mt. 12016 7000 84112000<br />
Acquisition <strong>of</strong> semipucca<br />
structures<br />
Acquisition <strong>of</strong> kucha<br />
structures<br />
Assistance Transitional allowance at the rate <strong>of</strong> Rs. 70<br />
per day for 24<br />
at the rate <strong>of</strong> Rs. 70<br />
per day for 48 days<br />
at the rate <strong>of</strong> Rs. 70<br />
per day for 72 days<br />
at the rate <strong>of</strong> Rs. 70<br />
per day for 100 days<br />
Sq. mt. 2871 5500 15790500<br />
Sq. mt. 1617 2500 4042500<br />
No. 121 70 203952<br />
No. 152 70 509880<br />
No. 152 70 764820<br />
No. 182 70 1274700<br />
Training<br />
ERG<br />
Rental<br />
Shifting<br />
grant <strong>of</strong> Rs, 1500 as<br />
Transitional<br />
allowance<br />
Training for upgradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> skills on<br />
DRDA pattern<br />
One-time Economic<br />
Rehabilitation Grant<br />
lump sum rental<br />
allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3000<br />
Lump sum rental<br />
allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />
6000.<br />
Lump sum shifting<br />
allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000<br />
No. 127 1500 190500<br />
No. 1827 4000 7308000<br />
No. 874 24000 20976000<br />
No. 270 3000 810000<br />
No. 31 6000 186000<br />
No. 400 1000 400000<br />
Lump sum shifting<br />
allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />
2000<br />
Livelihood Loss <strong>of</strong> wage lump sum transitional<br />
allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000<br />
No. 27 2000 54000<br />
No. 141 1000 141000<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> crops<br />
Non-perennial<br />
Grant towards crop<br />
lost due to forced<br />
relocation<br />
Lump<br />
sum<br />
lump sum 500000<br />
perennial<br />
Compensation for<br />
perennial crops and<br />
trees<br />
No. 1400 3500 4900000<br />
Kiosk<br />
lump sum shifting<br />
allowance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 300<br />
No. 28 300 8400<br />
Other Assets<br />
Religious place<br />
No.<br />
15<br />
125000 2250000<br />
Hand Pumps<br />
No.<br />
72<br />
100000 9000000<br />
Schools Sq. mt. 348 3000 1043700<br />
Compound wall<br />
Sq. mt.<br />
300<br />
1600 480000<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 155
Resettlement Action Plan Report Phase I (Priority I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Type Item Entitlement Unit Quantity Rate in Cost in Rs.<br />
Rs.<br />
Other structures<br />
Sq. mt.<br />
1789<br />
3000 5367000<br />
Religious platform<br />
Cu. M.<br />
1112<br />
1600 1779200<br />
Well<br />
No.<br />
11<br />
100000 1100000<br />
Water Tank<br />
No. 38 5000 190000<br />
Water tap<br />
No.<br />
34<br />
5000 170000<br />
Public toilet<br />
Sq. mt.<br />
17<br />
1800 30060<br />
Pump house<br />
Sq. mt.<br />
12<br />
1800 21600<br />
Training<br />
Training <strong>of</strong> <strong>Project</strong> &<br />
NGO staff<br />
Lump<br />
sum 500000 500000<br />
Support for RAP<br />
implementation NGO cost For Phase I & II<br />
Establishment cost<br />
CMUs<br />
Miscellaneous cost<br />
Lump<br />
sum 3239500 3239500<br />
Lump<br />
sum 1000000 1000000<br />
Lump<br />
sum 300000 300000<br />
Independent<br />
evaluation<br />
Lump<br />
sum 1000000 1000000<br />
Total 741452368<br />
Table 13.2: Estimated Budget for RAP Phase I<br />
Sl. No. Item Total amount in Rs.<br />
Financed By (in Rs.)<br />
World Bank<br />
GoHP<br />
1 Land Acquisition 571809056 0 571809056<br />
2 Structure compensation 103945000 0 133945000<br />
3 Assistance 32677852 32677852 0<br />
Livelihood 141000 141000 0<br />
6 Loss <strong>of</strong> crops 5400000 0 5400000<br />
9 Kiosk 8400 8400 0<br />
10 Other assets 21431560 21431560 0<br />
11 Training 500000 500000 0<br />
12 Support for RAP<br />
implementation<br />
5539500 5539500 0<br />
Total 741452368 60298312 711154056<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 156
Resettlement Action Plan Report Phase I (Priority I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 14 - MONITORING AND EVALUATION<br />
14.1. Introduction<br />
Involuntary resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) operations are invariably complex<br />
because they entail not merely compensation for lost assets but also—and much more<br />
importantly— the relocation <strong>of</strong> people and their economic re-establishment in a new<br />
place. The World Bank policy on Involuntary Resettlement is based on several<br />
universally held principles—minimization <strong>of</strong> resettlement, participation <strong>of</strong> affected<br />
populations, compensation at market rates, and economic rehabilitation—and to<br />
improve planning. However, plans provide a guideline, not a blueprint, for resettlement<br />
operations. Almost the minute project agencies begin implementing their resettlement<br />
plans, conditions, expectations, and options all start changing, requiring revisions in the<br />
planning documents.<br />
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are invaluable in providing the information necessary<br />
for revising the plans knowledgeably. M&E can provide critical information, in a timely<br />
manner, to project authorities, who must make decisions about how to proceed as the<br />
project progresses. From a project perspective, monitoring systems are the more<br />
important <strong>of</strong> the two activities because evaluations are essentially one-time<br />
assessments that help project planners more than project implementers while<br />
monitoring systems provide more continuous, and timely, information. Among<br />
monitoring systems, however, administrative monitoring for land acquisition is much<br />
more commonly done than socioeconomic monitoring <strong>of</strong> the adjustment and recovery<br />
<strong>of</strong> the affected population. This difference in implementing workable monitoring<br />
systems warrants examination, so that feasible socioeconomic monitoring systems can<br />
be implemented.<br />
This chapter discusses the monitoring and evaluation systems for the project. It suggests<br />
several reasons why socioeconomic monitoring systems have seldom been put in<br />
place successfully, and it suggests a small number <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic indicators that<br />
could be used for effective monitoring <strong>of</strong> the recovery <strong>of</strong> populations affected by<br />
resettlement operations. The paper concludes with an overview <strong>of</strong> the other<br />
requirements, beyond a workable indicator system, necessary to implement a viable<br />
socioeconomic monitoring system.<br />
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) are critical activities in involuntary resettlement.<br />
Monitoring involves periodic checking to ascertain whether activities are going<br />
according to the plan. It provides the feed back necessary for project management to<br />
keep the programmes on schedule. By contrast, evaluation is essentially a summing up,<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the project assessment <strong>of</strong> whether those activities actually achieved the<br />
intended aims. As per World Banks’ OP 4.12 "Monitoring provides both working system<br />
for project managers and a channel for the resettlers to make them know their needs<br />
and reactions to resettlement execution". Monitoring exercise will be undertaken<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 157
Resettlement Action Plan Report Phase I (Priority I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
internally in the project. The social development and land acquisition <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> HPRIDC<br />
on monthly basis will carry out the project’s internal monitoring, an independent<br />
external agency will be appointed for RAP implementation evaluation. The external<br />
agency will conduct mid term and end term evaluation <strong>of</strong> the project. Indicators,<br />
which will be monitored during the project, consist <strong>of</strong> two broad categories:<br />
• Process and output indicators or internal monitoring<br />
• Outcome/impact indicators or external evaluation<br />
14.2. Internal Monitoring<br />
Monitoring <strong>of</strong> involuntary resettlement operations require precisely, an application <strong>of</strong><br />
general project monitoring procedures and methods to the process accruing in<br />
resettlement but with particular attention to the specific high risks intrinsic in such<br />
operations. Therefore a mechanism should be put in place or continuous flow <strong>of</strong><br />
information. Thus, the social development <strong>of</strong>ficer at the State Level (Head Quarter) in<br />
close coordination with his counterparts at district level will carry out regular monitoring.<br />
The internal monitoring is a conventional monitoring <strong>of</strong> government related to physical<br />
factors such as, number <strong>of</strong> families affected, resettled, assistance extended,<br />
infrastructure facilities provided, etc. and other financial aspects, such as<br />
compensation paid, grant extended, etc. The internal M&E must be simultaneously<br />
carried out with the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Rehabilitation Action Plan (RAP).<br />
14.2.1. OBJECTIVES OF INTERNAL MONITORING<br />
The objectives <strong>of</strong> the internal monitoring are:<br />
• Operations Planning<br />
• Management and Implementation<br />
• Operational Trouble shooting and Feedback<br />
14.2.2. INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR INTERNAL MONITORING<br />
For internal monitoring the following information will be required:<br />
• Individual files on each project affected person<br />
• Grievance record<br />
• Action Plan and Progress reports<br />
14.2.3. MONITORING REPORTING SYSTEMS<br />
Crisis and day-to-day management and monitoring management will require its own<br />
improved action plans, regular coordination and onsite training sessions and a<br />
Management Information System (MIS) as internal system. It also requires troubleshooters<br />
and informal networks <strong>of</strong> feed back from the communities, NGOs, M&E<br />
agencies and other government bodies. Physical monitoring <strong>of</strong> services and finance in<br />
the system to ensure management and financing functions in a timely and effective<br />
manner. Monitoring and verification <strong>of</strong> the quantifiable progress <strong>of</strong> the resettlement<br />
programme to indicate the timeliness <strong>of</strong> the financial disbursements already agreed to<br />
and deviations from the critical path for all project components and the required<br />
integrated arrangements to resettle PAPs will be done throughout the project cycle.<br />
The SMU will produce monthly and quarterly progress report for resettlement plan<br />
implementation.<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 158
Resettlement Action Plan Report Phase I (Priority I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
14.2.4. INDICATORS FOR MONITORING<br />
Monitoring is a continuous process and will be carried out by ESMU on regular basis to<br />
keep track <strong>of</strong> the R&R progress. For this purpose, the indicators suggested under<br />
project input, project activity and project output have been given in table 14.1.<br />
Table 14.1: Indicators for Monitoring <strong>of</strong> RAP progress<br />
Parameters Indicators<br />
Physical • Extent <strong>of</strong> land acquired<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> structures dismantled<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> land users and private structure owners paid<br />
compensation<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> families affected<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> government agricultural land identified for<br />
allotment<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> EPs allotted agriculture land<br />
• Extent <strong>of</strong> agriculture land allotted<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> families approached NGO for purchase <strong>of</strong> land<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> families purchasing land and extent <strong>of</strong> land<br />
purchased.<br />
• Extent <strong>of</strong> government land identified for house sites<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> EPs receiving assistance/compensation<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> EPs provided transport facilities/ shifting allowance<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> EPs allotted house under EWS/LIG housing scheme<br />
Financial • Amount <strong>of</strong> compensation paid for land/structure<br />
• Cash grant for shifting oustees<br />
• Amount paid to NGOs<br />
• Consultancy fee paid to M&E agency<br />
• Establishment cost<br />
• Staff salaries<br />
• Vehicle maintenance<br />
• Operational expense <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice<br />
Social • Area and type <strong>of</strong> house and facility<br />
• Morbidity and mortality rates<br />
• Communal harmony<br />
• Dates <strong>of</strong> consulting <strong>Project</strong> and District level committee<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> time GRC and District level committees met<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> appeals placed before grievance redressal cell<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> grievances referred and addressed by DLC<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> cases referred and addressed by arbitration<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> EPs approached court<br />
Economic • Entitlement <strong>of</strong> EPs-land/cash<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> business re-established<br />
• Utilization <strong>of</strong> compensation<br />
• extent <strong>of</strong> agricultural land/house sites/business sites<br />
purchased<br />
• Successful implementation <strong>of</strong> Income<br />
• Restoration Schemes<br />
Grievance • Cases <strong>of</strong> LA referred to court, pending and settled<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> grievance cell meetings<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 159
Resettlement Action Plan Report Phase I (Priority I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
Parameters Indicators<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> village level meetings<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> field visits by RRO<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong> cases disposed by RRO to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> EPs.<br />
Establishment • Staffing position<br />
• Availability and use <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice equipment<br />
• Use <strong>of</strong> vehicle<br />
14.3. External Evaluation<br />
After the end <strong>of</strong> resettlement activities, an independent agency will conduct an<br />
evaluation study <strong>of</strong> affected Persons to determine whether or not the objectives <strong>of</strong><br />
the RP in terms <strong>of</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> incomes and living standards have been achieved.<br />
The methodology for the evaluation study should be based on the follow-up socioeconomic<br />
survey to determine the impact <strong>of</strong> the project on income levels and living<br />
standards <strong>of</strong> the affected people. Social and economic assessments <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong><br />
delivered entitlements and a measurement <strong>of</strong> the income and standards <strong>of</strong> living <strong>of</strong><br />
the PAPs before and after resettlement are integral components <strong>of</strong> this activity.<br />
Should the findings <strong>of</strong> the study indicate that the objectives <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />
rehabilitation have not been achieved; the consultant should propose appropriate<br />
additional assistance that may be necessary to achieve the stated objectives. A<br />
sample TOR <strong>of</strong> external evaluation agency is given in Annexure IX.<br />
14.3.1. OBJECTIVES OF EXTERNAL EVALUATION<br />
The primary objectives <strong>of</strong> the external evaluation are:<br />
• To evaluate that the income and standard <strong>of</strong> living <strong>of</strong> the PAPs vis-à-vis pre<br />
project scenario.<br />
• To assess the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> process and procedure adopted in<br />
implementation<br />
• To assess the timely distribution <strong>of</strong> compensation and assistance to the PAPs<br />
• To evaluate the performance <strong>of</strong> NGO in dealing with PAPs and PAPs opinion<br />
about the NGO services<br />
• To suggest any changes or improvement required for better result<br />
14.3.2. INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR EXTERNAL EVALUATION<br />
The following information is mainly required to facilitate external monitoring:<br />
• Sample survey (to be conducted by M&E agency)<br />
• Case studies/Thematic studies/Issue based research (to be conducted by M&E<br />
agency)<br />
• Participatory research (to be carried out by M&E agency)<br />
• Target group monitoring (to be carried out by M&E agency)<br />
14.3.3. EVALUATION REPORTING SYSTEMS<br />
Observing and appraising various specific parameters and processes as objectively as<br />
possible will be carried out. Periodic evaluation <strong>of</strong> these would indicate where and<br />
when policy changes could occur or where deficiencies in implementation method or<br />
style are apparent. The boundaries <strong>of</strong> this assessment will need the agency to examine<br />
the multiplier effects and linkages outside the project definition <strong>of</strong> affected people and<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 160
Resettlement Action Plan Report Phase I (Priority I)<br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong><br />
areas. The outcome evaluation will be carried out twice during the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
RAP, midterm and post implementation. Impact evaluation will look at all the affected<br />
populations; self-relocate; assisted resettled population; host population. Further, this<br />
larger population will be broken down into vulnerable segments <strong>of</strong> each population.<br />
Impact evaluation will be carried out on randomly selected segment <strong>of</strong> population.<br />
The external agency will submit monthly progress report and final report to the HPRIDC.<br />
14.3.4. INDICATORS FOR EVALUATION<br />
The list <strong>of</strong> impact performance indicators suggested to monitor project objectives is<br />
delineated in table 14.2. However, the evaluation agency can add or delete indicators<br />
in consultation with HPRIDC.<br />
Table 14.2: Indicators for <strong>Project</strong> Outcome Evaluation<br />
Objectives Risk Factor Outcomes and Impacts<br />
• The negative impact on<br />
persons affected by the<br />
project will be minimized.<br />
• Persons losing assets to the<br />
project shall be<br />
compensated at<br />
replacement cost.<br />
• The project-affected<br />
persons will be assisted in<br />
improving or regaining their<br />
standard <strong>of</strong> living.<br />
• Vulnerable groups will be<br />
identified and assisted in<br />
improving their standard <strong>of</strong><br />
living.<br />
• Resettlement plan<br />
implementation may take<br />
longer time than<br />
anticipated<br />
• Institutional arrangement<br />
may not function as<br />
efficiently as expected<br />
• NGO may not perform<br />
the task as efficiently as<br />
expected<br />
• Unexpected number <strong>of</strong><br />
grievances<br />
• Finding a suitable<br />
rehabilitation site for<br />
displaced population<br />
• PAPs falling below their<br />
existing standard <strong>of</strong><br />
living<br />
• Satisfaction <strong>of</strong> land owners with the<br />
compensation and assistance paid<br />
• Type <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> compensation and<br />
assistance by land owners<br />
• Satisfaction <strong>of</strong> structure owner with<br />
compensation and assistance<br />
• Type <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> compensation and<br />
assistance by structure owner<br />
• % <strong>of</strong> PAPs adopted the skill acquired<br />
through training as only economic activity<br />
• % <strong>of</strong> PAPs adopted the skill acquired<br />
through training as secondary economic<br />
activity<br />
• % <strong>of</strong> PAPs reported increase in income due<br />
to training<br />
• % PAPs got trained in the skill <strong>of</strong> their choice<br />
• Role <strong>of</strong> NGO in helping PAPs in selecting<br />
trade for skill improvement<br />
• Use <strong>of</strong> productive asset provided to EPs<br />
under on time economic rehabilitation grant<br />
• Type <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> additional assistance<br />
money by vulnerable group<br />
• Types <strong>of</strong> grievances received<br />
• No. <strong>of</strong> grievances forwarded to GRC and<br />
time taken to solve the grievances<br />
• % <strong>of</strong> PAPs aware about the GRC<br />
mechanism<br />
• % <strong>of</strong> PAPs aware about the entitlement<br />
frame work mechanism<br />
• PAPs opinion about NGO approach and<br />
accessibility<br />
• % <strong>of</strong> PAHs satisfied with relocation site and<br />
facility<br />
• % <strong>of</strong> PAHs believes the relocation site is<br />
better than previous one<br />
• Household income <strong>of</strong> vulnerable group<br />
Louis Berger Group Inc 161
ANNEXURE I: SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE SURVEY OF PAPS<br />
GENERAL INFORMATION<br />
1 - Name <strong>of</strong> enumerator___________________________ Date <strong>of</strong> Survey ____________<br />
2 - Name <strong>of</strong> Village/town and address _____________________________<br />
3 - Name <strong>of</strong> Supervisor ____________________________________<br />
4 - What is likely to be affected by the project? _______________________<br />
(Structure-1; Land-2; Structure and Land -3; Others-4; in case <strong>of</strong> others specify.)<br />
5 - Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent___________________________________________________<br />
6 - Relationship to the H.H ___________________________________________________<br />
7 - Years <strong>of</strong> Occupation <strong>of</strong> the Affected Property _____ Years<br />
8 - Religion: ___________ 1.Hindu 2.Muslim 3. Christian 4. Other (specify)<br />
9 - Social Status <strong>of</strong> family ------------------- 1 SC; 2 ST, 3 OBC; 4 General<br />
10 - Status <strong>of</strong> the user <strong>of</strong> the property: a) Title holder b) tenant c) Non title holder d) Trust e) <strong>Government</strong> f) NGO g) Panchyat<br />
AFFECTED PROPERTY INFORMATION<br />
Affected Structure Details:<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> construction<br />
Ro<strong>of</strong><br />
wall<br />
floor<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
floor<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
rent<br />
Utility<br />
connections<br />
Dist. From<br />
centre line<br />
Total area in<br />
sq. mt.<br />
Structure<br />
length width Height<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Use: 1. Residence; 2. Commercial; 3. residential cum commercial; 4.Cow shed/poultry shade; 5. Other (specify)<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> construction: 1. Kacha 2. Semi-Pucca 3. Pucca
Ro<strong>of</strong>: 1 RCC; 2-Tin/Asbestos; 3- thatched; 4- Tiles<br />
Wall: 1-brick; 2- mud; 3-tin/ wood plank<br />
Floor: 1- cement; 2- mud<br />
Tenure Status: 1. Own 2. Rented 3. Leasehold<br />
Utility connection: 1. Electricity 2. Water 3. Phone<br />
Affected Land details<br />
1. Size <strong>of</strong> affected land ________________<br />
2. Type <strong>of</strong> land____________ 1. Agriculture; 2. Residential; 3. Commercial; 4.Barren; 5. Grazing land<br />
3. If agriculture, is the land ____________ 1. Wet 2. Dry 3. Other<br />
4. What are the crops that you grow?<br />
1.Rice ;2.Maize; 3.Wheat; 4.Millet; 5.Potato; 6.Vegetables; 7. Apples; 8.Orange; 9.Apricot; 10.other<br />
5. What are the others immovable assets likely to be affected?<br />
Trees Apple Orange Apricot<br />
No.<br />
6. In your view, what is the yearly monetary benefit you gain from lost land?<br />
Household Composition and Personal Information<br />
Sl. No Name <strong>of</strong> Persons Relationship<br />
with<br />
HH<br />
Gender Age Marital<br />
Status<br />
1<br />
HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION<br />
Qualificati<br />
on<br />
Usual<br />
activity<br />
Main<br />
Occupation<br />
Monthly<br />
Income<br />
Marginal<br />
Occupation<br />
Monthly<br />
Income<br />
Skill<br />
Possesse<br />
d<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5
Sl. No Name <strong>of</strong> Persons Relationship<br />
with<br />
HH<br />
6<br />
Gender Age Marital<br />
Status<br />
Qualificati<br />
on<br />
Usual<br />
activity<br />
Main<br />
Occupation<br />
Monthly<br />
Income<br />
Marginal<br />
Occupation<br />
Monthly<br />
Income<br />
Skill<br />
Possesse<br />
d<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
Gender: 1-Male 2-Female<br />
Relationship: 1-Self 2-Wife; 3-son/daughter 4-Brother/Sister 5-son-in-law/Daughter-in-law 6-Parents<br />
7-Grand children 8-others<br />
Marital Status: 1-unmarried 2-Married 3-Widow 4-Widower 5- Divorcee 6- Separated<br />
Qualification: 1- illiterate 2- Primary 3-Seondary 4-High school 5-Under graduate 6-Graduate 7-post-graduate<br />
8-Others<br />
Occupation: 1-Farming 2-Farm Labour 3-Daily wage labour 4-Service 5-Trade/business 6-animal husbandry<br />
7-other
Disability Aspects in the family<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> disability Blind Crippled Mentally disabled Other<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> member<br />
Household Income from Various Sources during Last One Year (In Rs.)<br />
Agriculture HH industry<br />
Dairy<br />
Goatery<br />
Business<br />
Sheep rearing<br />
Service<br />
Others<br />
INFORMATION OTHER THAN AFFECTED PROPERTIES<br />
Asset Ownership – Immovable assets (other than the affected ones)<br />
<strong>Description</strong><br />
a. Total area <strong>of</strong> immovable property owned by the HH (acre)<br />
b. Built up area used for dwelling/shop (sq. ft)<br />
c. Area used for agricultural production, if any (acre)<br />
d. Area used for grazing (acre)<br />
e. Area under backyard production<br />
f. Area under tree<br />
Unit<br />
Assets ownership (Please Record Numbers)<br />
Television Tape Radio Refrigerator Telephone<br />
Recorder<br />
Cycles<br />
Three<br />
Wheeler<br />
Vehicles<br />
Two<br />
Wheeler<br />
Four Wheeler Bus /<br />
Truck<br />
Cooking<br />
Gas<br />
Any<br />
Other<br />
(specify)
Live Stock Assets (Please Record Numbers)<br />
Classification Cows Buffaloes<br />
Sheep Goats Poultry Others<br />
Give Number<br />
Household Expenditure<br />
Categories Items Price in rupees<br />
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
D<br />
E<br />
F<br />
Food<br />
Cooking fuel<br />
Clothing<br />
Transport<br />
Health care<br />
Education<br />
G Lighting and utilities<br />
H<br />
Social functions/festivities<br />
I Agriculture (e.g., hiring <strong>of</strong> implements, labour, etc.)<br />
J<br />
Seeds<br />
K Fertilizer and pesticides<br />
L<br />
Other (specify)<br />
Total<br />
Household health status<br />
1. Was any member <strong>of</strong> your family affected by any major illness in the past one year?<br />
1. Yes 2. No
IF YES, INDICATE THE DETAILS:<br />
Treatment Taken<br />
# Type <strong>of</strong> Disease/Illness No. <strong>of</strong> Cases Yes No<br />
A<br />
B<br />
c<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
preferred<br />
Distance travelled<br />
for treatment<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Related<br />
1. Are you aware <strong>of</strong> the proposed road development? 1) Yes 2) No<br />
2. If yes, what is the source? _______ 1) TV 2) News Paper 3) <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial 4) friend/relative 5) other<br />
3. What is your opinion about the project? _______ 1) Good 2) Bad 3) Can’t say<br />
4. If good, what positive impacts do you perceive (can have multiple choice)?<br />
1- Increase in employment opportunity 2- increase in land price<br />
3- more value for local product 4- better infrastructure facility<br />
5- Increase in business opportunity 6- other (specify)<br />
5. If bad, what are the negative impacts do you perceive (can have multiple choice)?<br />
1- Loss <strong>of</strong> land and income opportunity 2- pressure on existing infrastructure<br />
3- Influx <strong>of</strong> population 4- conflict with outsiders<br />
5- Increase in antisocial elements 6-other (specify)<br />
Resettlement and Rehabilitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAPs :<br />
1. Are you willing to Resettle Voluntarily? __________ (Yes-1, No-2)<br />
(Residence getting displaced)<br />
(i) How far do you prefer to be relocated? 1.Within the village or town 2. Outside the village/town<br />
(ii) If outside the village or town kindly give the name other place___________________<br />
(iii) How far is this place from the present location? _________
(iv) What is your preferred rehabilitation measure? (Only one choice)<br />
• Replacement value & Rehabilitation grant<br />
• Plot on cost basis, Replacement value & Rehabilitation grant<br />
• Free plot and construction allowance (vulnerable)<br />
• Others (specify)<br />
(v) Infrastructure enjoyed by the household or entrepreneur at present moment____________________.<br />
(vi) Infrastructure facilities expected at the relocation site_____________<br />
(Commercial structure is getting displaced)<br />
(i) How far do you prefer to be relocated? 1. Within the village or town 2. Outside the village/town<br />
(ii) If outside the village or town kindly give the name other place___________________<br />
(iii) How far is this place from the present location? _________<br />
(iv) What do you prefer as rehabilitation measure? _________________<br />
• Replacement value & Rehabilitation grant<br />
• Plot on cost basis, Replacement value & Rehabilitation grant<br />
• Free plot and construction allowance (vulnerable & land less)<br />
• Others (specify)<br />
TENANT<br />
(Residence getting affected)<br />
(i) What do you prefer for rehabilitation? ________________<br />
• Shifting Allowance and rental allowance<br />
• Self-relocation Others (specify)<br />
(Commercial structure getting affected)<br />
(i) What do you prefer for rehabilitation?<br />
• Shifting Allowance, rental allowance and training<br />
• Others (specify)
Identification <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>Project</strong> Affected<br />
1. Survey No __________<br />
2. Sub–division No_______<br />
3. Total area <strong>of</strong> the owner/sharecropper in acres: _________<br />
4. Area to be acquired: _______________<br />
5. Name <strong>of</strong> the land owner/sharecropper _________<br />
6. Sex M/F ____<br />
7. Village____________ Tehsil: ________________ District___________________<br />
8. Social status <strong>of</strong> owner : 1 SC 2 ST 3 OBC 4 BC 5General<br />
Only for Tribal/Indigenous People <strong>Project</strong> Affected Families:<br />
1. For How many years the land is being cultivated by you/your ancestors:-----------<br />
2. What are major produce: 1 ------ 2 ------ 3 ------ 4 -----<br />
3. Total annual income from all sources: Rs. __________<br />
4. Total No. <strong>of</strong> family members: ________<br />
5. Type <strong>of</strong> Land : 1 Irrigated 2 Un–irrigated 3 Waste land 4 Others (specify)<br />
6. Market value <strong>of</strong> land ( per acre) as quoted by sellers. buyers and agents: ____<br />
7. Govt. rate <strong>of</strong> land/acre from registration (Jantri price) ________<br />
8. What do you prefer for rehabilitation:<br />
• Land for land<br />
• Cash compensation<br />
• Assistance for allied activities<br />
• training for other vocational activities
Other<br />
1. Is there any child (below 14) working in your family? __________ 1Yes 2 No<br />
If yes, number <strong>of</strong> children: ________ Male: __________ Female: __________<br />
Annual amount earned: Rs._____________<br />
2. INDEBTNESS (Please indicate your borrowings during last one year)<br />
Purpose Amount (Rs.) Source <strong>of</strong> Borrowing Amount Returned (in<br />
Rs.)<br />
Balance (in Rs)<br />
Agriculture<br />
Residential (house)<br />
Commercial<br />
Animal Husbandry<br />
Others<br />
3. Have you availed <strong>of</strong> benefit under any Govt. Schemes?<br />
Yes Amount Availed Training<br />
JRY/IJRY<br />
DWACRA<br />
IRDP<br />
PMRY<br />
Others (specify)
ANNEXURE - II<br />
1. Definitions<br />
Cut-<strong>of</strong>f date<br />
Cut-<strong>of</strong>f date shall be the following:<br />
In the cases <strong>of</strong> land acquisition affecting legal titleholders, the cut-<strong>of</strong>f date would be the<br />
date <strong>of</strong> issuing the notice u/s 4(1) <strong>of</strong> the LA Act, 1894.<br />
In cases where people lack title, the cut-<strong>of</strong>f-date shall be a year prior to the date <strong>of</strong> start<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Census survey undertaken by the project authority.<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Affected Person<br />
Affected persons are those who stand to lose all or part <strong>of</strong> their physical and non physical<br />
assets including homes, productive land, community resources, commercial properties;<br />
livelihood; and socio-cultural network.<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Displaced person<br />
A displaced person is a person who is compelled to change his/her place <strong>of</strong> residence<br />
and/or work place or place <strong>of</strong> business, due to the project.<br />
Definition <strong>of</strong> Family<br />
a. “Family” shall mean husband, wife and dependants including parents and children in<br />
case <strong>of</strong> joint family on the date <strong>of</strong> section 4 <strong>of</strong> LA Act or entry in the family register <strong>of</strong><br />
Panchayat as on 1st January <strong>of</strong> preceding year, which ever is earlier for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
ERG, TA, shifting allowance and allotments <strong>of</strong> land and shop.<br />
b. Major sons and daughters will be treated as separate family if their livelihood is<br />
separately affected by the project.<br />
Wage Earner<br />
A person who is working with a commercial establishment or working as a labour in an<br />
agriculture land, which is being affected by the project.<br />
Encroacher<br />
A person, who has trespassed Govt. land, adjacent to his/her own land or asset, to which<br />
he/she is not entitled, and deriving his/her livelihood prior to the cut-<strong>of</strong>f date. If such a<br />
person is vulnerable, he/she would be entitled to assistance as per the provisions in the<br />
policy.<br />
Squatter<br />
Squatter is a person who is land less and has settled on publicly owned land without<br />
permission and has been occupying publicly owned building without authority prior to the<br />
cut-<strong>of</strong>f date.<br />
Income<br />
Income <strong>of</strong> a PAP shall mean the amount <strong>of</strong> income as shown in his Income Tax Return prior<br />
to the cut-<strong>of</strong>f date. In absence <strong>of</strong> such a return, his income shall be calculated by an<br />
objective assessment applying the same method as adopted by the Govt. agencies for<br />
1
ANNEXURE - II<br />
identifying B.P.L. families. The certificate <strong>of</strong> B.P.L. from the block / Tehsil will be used for<br />
identifying the B.P.L.<br />
Vulnerable Person<br />
Unless otherwise specifically mentioned in this document, a person who has been<br />
designated under ‘Below Poverty Line’ category as identified by the concerned State<br />
Govt. level will be considered a vulnerable person. Disadvantaged persons belonging to<br />
SC, ST, disabled, handicapped, orphans, destitute persons and woman heading the<br />
household are also recognized as vulnerable person.<br />
Titleholders (THs)<br />
Persons who possess legal documents in support <strong>of</strong> claims made towards ownership <strong>of</strong><br />
structure or land are titleholder.<br />
Subtenants<br />
Persons, who not being tenants, are allowed to cultivate land on certain terms and<br />
conditions.<br />
Sharecroppers<br />
Persons who cultivate land <strong>of</strong> a titleholder on terms <strong>of</strong> sharing income there from with the<br />
titleholder<br />
Landless agricultural labourer<br />
A person who does not hold any agricultural land and who has been deriving his main<br />
income by working on the lands <strong>of</strong> others as subtenant or as an agricultural labourer prior<br />
to the cut-<strong>of</strong>f date.<br />
Small farmer<br />
A farmer holding 2 hectares <strong>of</strong> un-irrigated or 1 hectare <strong>of</strong> irrigated land will be treated as<br />
a small farmer.<br />
Marginal farmer<br />
A farmer holding 1 hectare <strong>of</strong> un-irrigated or 1/2 hectare <strong>of</strong> irrigated land will be treated<br />
as a marginal farmer.<br />
Minimum Economic Holding (MEH)<br />
Five bighas (one acre) <strong>of</strong> a landholding shall be considered as MEH. In Scheduled Areas<br />
20 bighas is the minimum economic holding.<br />
Kiosk<br />
Kiosk is a temporary structure not fixed to ground. Normally kiosks are wooden structure on<br />
four legs on the ground and can be easily moved.<br />
Definition <strong>of</strong> Entitlements under R & R<br />
The entitlements given under entitlement framework are (1) Economic Rehabilitation<br />
Grant (ERG), (2) Transitional Allowance (TA)/ Sustenance Allowance, (3) Shifting<br />
Allowance (SA) and (4) Training Allowance.<br />
2
ANNEXURE - II<br />
Basis for calculating ERG and Transitional allowance:<br />
The ERG will be calculated based on BPL cut <strong>of</strong>f line <strong>of</strong> the state. The yearly figure will be<br />
converted into monthly amount. An addition <strong>of</strong> 25% over and above the cut <strong>of</strong>f line will<br />
ensure that inflation rate is also taken care <strong>of</strong>. Therefore, ERG amount would be Rs. 24,000.<br />
ERG will not cover the consumable items.<br />
Transitional allowance shall be calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> minimum daily wages (<strong>of</strong> Rs. 70)<br />
for a period <strong>of</strong> 24 days, 48 days, 72 days or 100 days as the case may be.<br />
Basis for calculating shifting allowance and Training allowance:<br />
Shifting allowance will be a lump sum amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1000 if shifting is within the village or<br />
municipal limits or Rs. 2000 if it is beyond 2 km or outside the limits <strong>of</strong> village or municipality.<br />
For calculating training allowance, following heads will be considered:<br />
‣ Amount to be paid to the master trainer<br />
‣ Cost towards travel, stay and food <strong>of</strong> trainees<br />
‣ Hiring <strong>of</strong> training venue<br />
‣ Raw material to be used during training<br />
The total amount will be divided by total number <strong>of</strong> trainees to arrive at training allowance<br />
for each PAP.<br />
Rental allowance: A lump sum amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3000 in rural areas and Rs. 6000 in urban<br />
areas shall be given to mitigate the disruption caused due to the project.<br />
Replacement Cost<br />
Replacement cost is the cost <strong>of</strong> purchasing comparable assets elsewhere by the affected<br />
person in lieu <strong>of</strong> the acquired land and other amenities, buildings etc.<br />
The compensation awarded for the acquired land and other amenities, buildings, etc.<br />
should be adequate to enable purchase <strong>of</strong> comparable assets elsewhere by the affected<br />
person. Wherever compensation is not adequate enough to buy replacement<br />
lands/buildings, the project authority shall provide other assistance to overcome the<br />
shortfall.<br />
Economic rehabilitation grant (ERG)<br />
Economic Rehabilitation Grant (ERG) is a grant given to a PAP belonging to a vulnerable<br />
family losing livelihood viz; loss <strong>of</strong> commercial unit (owner as well as helping hands); loss <strong>of</strong><br />
land including title holder, daily labourer, share cropper, etc. ERG will be given only to<br />
those members who are dependent on the affected property (land or shop etc.).<br />
Transitional Allowance (TA)<br />
Transitional Allowance is provided as assistance to adversely affected/displaced persons,<br />
except owners <strong>of</strong> kiosks.<br />
3
ANNEXURE - II<br />
Shifting Allowance<br />
Shifting Allowance is a one-time lump sum amount to enable shifting <strong>of</strong> family and<br />
household assets. Anybody getting displaced is entitled for this allowance.<br />
Training Allowance<br />
Training Allowance is a fixed sum for providing training to the eligible PAPs. Vocational<br />
training is provided to PAPs losing livelihood, as per their identified new vocations and the<br />
related training needs.<br />
2. Legal Framework<br />
The project entails acquisition <strong>of</strong> land along the project routes. Land will be acquired<br />
through Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The salient features <strong>of</strong> the Act have been presented<br />
below:<br />
Land Acquisition Act, 1894<br />
Sections <strong>of</strong> Land <strong>Description</strong><br />
Acquisition Act,<br />
1894<br />
3 Definition<br />
4 Publication <strong>of</strong> preliminary notification and powers <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers to enter for<br />
survey<br />
5 Payment for damage<br />
5A<br />
Hearing <strong>of</strong> Objections<br />
6 Declaration that land is required for a public purpose<br />
7 After declaration, Collector to take order for acquisition<br />
8 Land to be marked out, measured and planned<br />
9 Notice to persons interested<br />
10 Powers to require and enforce the making <strong>of</strong> statements as to names and<br />
interests<br />
11 Enquiry into measurements, value and claims and award by Collector<br />
12 Award <strong>of</strong> Collector when to be final<br />
13A<br />
Correction <strong>of</strong> Clerical Errors, etc.<br />
16 Power to take possession<br />
17 Special powers in cases <strong>of</strong> urgency<br />
18 Reference to court<br />
23 Matters to be considered in determining compensation<br />
24 Matters to be neglected in determining compensation<br />
Land can also be acquired through private transaction where in, the buyer and the seller<br />
negotiate the “price” between themselves. The seller is willing to sell. The buyer is willing<br />
to buy. The price <strong>of</strong>fered and accepted is decided mutually and finally agreed upon.<br />
The level at which the price is fixed is determined based on the “market conditions”.<br />
<strong>Government</strong> procedure for negotiations vide Notification no: PBW (B) A (6) 2-64/2001-<br />
dated 13 July, 2004 shall be followed to this effect.<br />
However, in the acquisition <strong>of</strong> private lands by the state the landowner’s consent and<br />
willingness is not necessarily obtained under the LA Act. The person will lose land even if<br />
4
ANNEXURE - II<br />
he/she does not want to part with it. Secondly, while fixing the compensation amount the<br />
land owners’ objections and opinions are heard (under section 9 and 11 <strong>of</strong> the LAA), but it<br />
is not necessary that the amount quoted by him/her must be agreed to. The landowner<br />
thus has no control over his/her right <strong>of</strong> ownership or on the level <strong>of</strong> compensation. It may<br />
be said therefore that compensation is not a price.<br />
Market Value<br />
The Land Acquisition Act (u/s 23) stipulates that while determining compensation the<br />
“market value” prevailing on the date <strong>of</strong> preliminary notification (u/s 4(1)) should be taken<br />
into consideration. However, the Act or the Rules neither define “market value” nor<br />
specify the mechanisms to fix the same.<br />
Solatium<br />
Acquisition <strong>of</strong> lands by the state is compulsory in nature. Such compulsion injures the<br />
feelings and causes inconvenience to the owners. The law therefore provides for the<br />
payment <strong>of</strong> mandatory “solatium”. The percentage <strong>of</strong> solatium has varied from time to<br />
time. With effect from September 1984 when LAA was amended, it is 30 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
market value.<br />
Additional Market Value<br />
The reckoning date for ascertaining the market value is the date on which preliminary<br />
notification (u/s 4(1)) is published. Between this notification and actually taking possession<br />
<strong>of</strong> the land, ordinarily there will be a time gap varying between three months to three<br />
years. Retr<strong>of</strong>itting the market value as on the date <strong>of</strong> 4(1) notification would cause a<br />
great loss to the owner. The law, therefore, provides for an additional market value at the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> 12 percent per annum <strong>of</strong> the market value from the date <strong>of</strong> 4(1) notification till the<br />
date <strong>of</strong> award or taking possession which ever is earlier.<br />
Interest<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> delay, the law provides for payment <strong>of</strong> interest on the compensation. For the<br />
first 12 months, the interest at the rate <strong>of</strong> 12 percent is payable from the date <strong>of</strong> the<br />
award. For delays beyond 12 months from the date <strong>of</strong> declaration <strong>of</strong> the award, 15<br />
percent is the rate <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
3. Calculation <strong>of</strong> replacement value<br />
In this project, replacement value <strong>of</strong> land will be calculated by the following three<br />
methods and the highest value <strong>of</strong> the three shall be considered:<br />
• Taking into account such prescribed rates or the average <strong>of</strong> the actual transaction<br />
rates <strong>of</strong> similar lands for contemporary years for which sale deeds are registered.<br />
• Taking into consideration 20 times <strong>of</strong> the annual value <strong>of</strong> gross production <strong>of</strong> the<br />
concerned land, averaged over preceding five years. For this purpose, authentic<br />
5
ANNEXURE - II<br />
secondary data from the district statistical Handbook, the data from the local agricultural<br />
produce samities, and agricultural department should be used.<br />
• Fixing up market value <strong>of</strong> land equal to the minimum land value if so prescribed by<br />
the State <strong>Government</strong> under Indian Stamp Act for the purpose <strong>of</strong> registration <strong>of</strong> sale<br />
deeds under Indian Registration Act <strong>of</strong> 1908.<br />
By paying the highest <strong>of</strong> the three methods, the compensation awarded will be at<br />
replacement cost.<br />
4. Impact and Entitlement Categories<br />
During the reconnaissance survey following impact categories was identified:<br />
Direct Losses:<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> agriculture land / orchard (full or partial)<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> residential structures<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> commercial structures<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> Common Property Resources<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> religious structures<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> government properties such as banks, government <strong>of</strong>fices, schools, etc.<br />
Temporary Losses during construction phase:<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> Livelihood as agriculture labour; orchard worker; working hands in road side<br />
eateries; etc<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> access to agriculture land; CPRs; etc<br />
5. Issues and Broad Entitlement Framework<br />
5.1. Issues<br />
Normally large variations are observed between the land record database with the PWD<br />
and the revenue records. The gaps have also been observed in the land record system<br />
with the revenue department and the field level situation particularly the share <strong>of</strong> legal<br />
heirs due to lack <strong>of</strong> updating <strong>of</strong> transfers/ mutations, sale <strong>of</strong> land without mutation etc.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> settlements develops along the highways by subdividing the agricultural land<br />
for residential and commercial activities due to the potential <strong>of</strong> location but the revenue<br />
records does not contain the updated status with respect to change in the land-use. For<br />
e.g., agriculture land along the highway is currently being used as either residential or<br />
commercial, but in revenue records the land use still remains as agriculture land. Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> cases has been found where the land has been allotted to a person/ group <strong>of</strong> persons<br />
under various government schemes or by the institution <strong>of</strong> local self - government<br />
(allotted/ leased/ land share, etc), or allotted/ leased land transferred through power <strong>of</strong><br />
6
ANNEXURE - II<br />
attorney or any other legal instrument, but the ownership records are not clear. In<br />
addition, in some cases it has been found that the land was acquired (as per PWD<br />
records) in earlier road expansion schemes but the subject is under the judicial<br />
consideration/ dispute at the time <strong>of</strong> cut-<strong>of</strong>f date. All these have lead to complications in<br />
deciding the actual ownership <strong>of</strong> the titleholder and eligibility as per the LA Act for<br />
compensation. These issues are therefore, critical and appropriate policy measures are to<br />
be planned in order to fulfil the objectives <strong>of</strong> R&R. For the smooth implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project, it is proposed to provide compensation at the replacement value <strong>of</strong> land for the<br />
cases where the ownership falls under the above or such similar categories.<br />
5.2. Broad Entitlement Categories<br />
Based on the assessed impacts and the broad entitlement framework, the affected<br />
persons in the project will be entitled to five types <strong>of</strong> compensation and assistance: (i)<br />
compensation for loss <strong>of</strong> land, crops / trees; (ii) compensation for structures (residential/<br />
commercial) and other immovable assets; (iii) assistance for loss <strong>of</strong> business/ wage<br />
income; and (iv) assistance for resettlement and relocation, (v) rebuilding and/ or<br />
restoration <strong>of</strong> community resources/ facilities.<br />
The broad entitlement framework for the different categories <strong>of</strong> PAPs is presented below:<br />
Agricultural titleholders<br />
Land records in India are not updated properly, leading to complications in deciding the<br />
actual ownership, particularly the share <strong>of</strong> legal heirs <strong>of</strong> the titleholder. Therefore, one <strong>of</strong><br />
the major areas where NGOs can effectively facilitate the work <strong>of</strong> land acquisition is<br />
updating <strong>of</strong> land records. To achieve this, NGO will undertake verification <strong>of</strong> land records<br />
followed by verification on the spot related to identified plots and owners.<br />
Once the land records are updated, calculation <strong>of</strong> replacement value <strong>of</strong> land will be<br />
done by the methods described above in section 1.3.2 and the highest value shall be<br />
considered.<br />
In cases where land use pattern has not been changed from agricultural land to<br />
residential/ commercial then the replacement value will be worked out on the basis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
transaction rates, provided the development <strong>of</strong> residential/commercial plots is in a cluster.<br />
Isolated cases <strong>of</strong> alienation <strong>of</strong> agricultural land will not be considered as change in land<br />
use.<br />
The replacement value for the land will be the highest <strong>of</strong> the values arrived by the above<br />
methods. If the compensation decided by the competent authority is less than the<br />
replacement cost, the difference will be paid to the EP in the form <strong>of</strong> assistance.<br />
In some cases it may so happen that after acquisition the remaining plot <strong>of</strong> the entitled<br />
person (EP) may not be viable. In such cases, the EP will have the option <strong>of</strong> either keeping<br />
the remaining land or getting the replacement value <strong>of</strong> the entire land, including the<br />
remaining unviable piece <strong>of</strong> land that shall also be acquired by PWD. If EP is from<br />
7
ANNEXURE - II<br />
vulnerable group, compensation for the entire land may be provided by means <strong>of</strong> land<br />
for land, if so wished by the EP, provided that the land <strong>of</strong> equal or more productive value<br />
is available.<br />
The agricultural titleholder EPs looses less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the total land holding and remaining<br />
land holding is more than 5 bighas, will be entitled for compensation at replacement<br />
value. In case where the land acquired is more than 20%, still remaining land holding is<br />
more than 5 bighas, EP will be entitled compensation at replacement value, training for<br />
skill up-gradation and ERG 1 for vulnerable groups. EPs whose remaining landholding goes<br />
below 5 bighas after acquisition will be entitled for compensation at replacement value,<br />
transitional allowance as per the severity <strong>of</strong> the impact (refer entitlement matrix), training<br />
for vulnerable groups and ERG.<br />
The absentee landlords will receive only the compensation at “replacement cost”.<br />
In cases where, in the revenue records, the land is in the name <strong>of</strong> the head <strong>of</strong> the<br />
household, but actually possessed by some other member <strong>of</strong> the household, and<br />
Training/ERG (if vulnerable) will be paid to the person who is actually loosing the land. In<br />
such cases though, as per revenue records, the compensation will be paid to the<br />
titleholder.<br />
In cases <strong>of</strong> disputes such as where land records are not updated/mutated or where the<br />
EPs are unable to produce the desired documents, then the compensation amount will be<br />
deposited with the competent authority till the disposal <strong>of</strong> dispute.<br />
All fees, taxes and other charges, as applicable under the relevant laws, incurred in the<br />
relocation and resource establishment will be borne by the project.<br />
Land losers with unclear titles<br />
For the categories <strong>of</strong> PAPs whose ownership titles are not clear, like people residing in the<br />
abadi lands, or where the land was given to a person/ group <strong>of</strong> persons under various<br />
government schemes or by the institution <strong>of</strong> local self government (allotted/ leased/ land<br />
share after Chakbandi etc), or allotted/ leased land transferred through power <strong>of</strong> attorney<br />
or any other legal instrument, but the ownership records are not clear; the replacement<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> the land would be provided in the form <strong>of</strong> replacement assistance. For such cases<br />
rehabilitation assistance would be provided as for the non-agricultural titleholders.<br />
Non-agricultural Titleholders<br />
The replacement cost <strong>of</strong> the residential or commercial structure (part or full), will be<br />
calculated as per the prevailing basic schedule <strong>of</strong> rates without depreciation, subject to<br />
1 ERG will be given in form <strong>of</strong> productive assets but will not include any consumables. Effort will be made to dovetail<br />
poverty alleviation programmes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India<br />
8
ANNEXURE - II<br />
relevant “quality standards” <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>of</strong> Rates as maintained by PWD. The evaluation<br />
<strong>of</strong> assets will be with the help <strong>of</strong> a registered <strong>Government</strong> approved valuer.<br />
If a titleholder EP looses less than 20% <strong>of</strong> residential unit and remaining structure is viable,<br />
will be entitled for replacement value <strong>of</strong> the asset lost (structure as well as land) and will<br />
have the right to salvage material from demolished structure. If loss is more than 20% and<br />
remaining structure becomes unviable 2 , EP will be entitled to lump sum rental allowance<br />
and shifting allowance. Vulnerable houseless EPs will be entitled for free plots <strong>of</strong> 40 to 70<br />
sq. m and house building allowance equivalent to amount under IAY.<br />
All the EPs who loose their commercial properties (and hence their livelihood) would be<br />
provided rental allowance for 6 months, training for up-gradation <strong>of</strong> skills, 25 sq. m <strong>of</strong> plot<br />
on cost basis and shifting allowance. Vulnerable persons amongst such EPs would be<br />
provided one-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant (ERG), in the form <strong>of</strong> productive assets<br />
and free plot <strong>of</strong> 25 sq. m.<br />
In cases where the property is under mortgage, the outstanding amount will be paid to<br />
the lending agency from the entitlements due to this.<br />
If residential displaced persons approach in a group <strong>of</strong> 25 or more, they will be entitled for<br />
a plot <strong>of</strong> 40 to 70 sq. meter and construction allowance. Similarly commercial titleholder<br />
getting displaced will be entitled for a plot <strong>of</strong> 25 sq. meter and construction allowance.<br />
Tenants<br />
The tenants will be compensated for any structure that they might have erected on the<br />
property <strong>of</strong> the landlord. They will also be paid the amount <strong>of</strong> deposit or advance<br />
payment paid by them to the landlord or the remaining amount at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
expropriation. All such amounts paid to the tenants will be deducted from the payment<br />
due to the landlord. The tenants will also be entitled for a rental allowance in<br />
consideration <strong>of</strong> disruption caused to them. A lump-sum shifting allowance will also be<br />
paid to them for shifting their assets. The figure for rental assistance will be the average<br />
rent paid on the day <strong>of</strong> survey. The information on average rental amount will be<br />
gathered during census and socio-economic survey.<br />
All the tenants whose livelihood activity is affected would be provided training for upgradation<br />
<strong>of</strong> skills. Vulnerable persons amongst such EPs would also be provided one-time<br />
ERG in the form <strong>of</strong> productive assets.<br />
Wage earners and Sharecroppers<br />
Wage earners and sharecroppers are whose livelihood is affected due to the<br />
displacement <strong>of</strong> the employer. Therefore, they will be paid transitional allowance, if<br />
2 If the balance built up area <strong>of</strong> the affected structure is less than the area under IAY housing, the structure will be<br />
deemed as unviable.<br />
9
ANNEXURE - II<br />
associated for past 3 years. If the wage earner is willing to undertake training for acquiring<br />
new skill or for up-gradation <strong>of</strong> skills then he will be provided training. In cases <strong>of</strong><br />
vulnerable groups, one time ERG will also be provided in the form <strong>of</strong> assets.<br />
Encroachers<br />
Encroachers will be notified in time, preferable two months in advance in which to remove<br />
their assets and harvest their crops. The encroachers will receive no compensation for<br />
land. The vulnerable encroachers will be paid Compensation for structures at<br />
replacement cost. The replacement cost <strong>of</strong> the residential or commercial structure (part or<br />
full), will be calculated as per the prevailing basic schedule <strong>of</strong> rates without depreciation,<br />
subject to relevant “quality standards” <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>of</strong> Rates as maintained by PWD. The<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> assets will be with the help <strong>of</strong> a registered <strong>Government</strong> approved valuer.<br />
The compensation for the structures decided by the competent authority will be at the<br />
replacement cost. All encroachers will have right to salvage their materials from the<br />
demolished structures.<br />
All the encroachers, whose commercial structures are demolished for the project, would<br />
be provided training for up-gradation <strong>of</strong> skills. Vulnerable persons amongst such EPs would<br />
also be provided one-time ERG, in the form <strong>of</strong> productive assets.<br />
Squatters<br />
The squatters will receive no compensation for land. They will, however, be Compensated<br />
for loss <strong>of</strong> structures at replacement cost. A lump sum shifting allowance will also be paid<br />
to the squatters. The EPs will have the right to salvage their materials from the demolished<br />
structure.<br />
All the squatters, whose commercial structures are demolished for the project, would be<br />
provided training for up-gradation <strong>of</strong> skills. Vulnerable persons amongst such EPs would<br />
also be provided one-time ERG, in the form <strong>of</strong> productive assets.<br />
Kiosks<br />
Kiosk owners will receive lump sum shifting assistance. If 50 or more kiosk owners approach<br />
in a group, vendor market will be provided to them.<br />
Common Properties<br />
During the design phase, all efforts will be made to avoid acquisition <strong>of</strong> common<br />
properties. However, in unavoidable cases, some common properties need to be<br />
acquired for the project. All such properties that can be replaced, will be relocated at a<br />
nearest available site, in consultation with the local communities. The loss <strong>of</strong> forest areas,<br />
which are impossible to relocate, will be compensated in consultation with concerned<br />
forest department. Efforts will be made to enhance the relocated common properties,<br />
and also other such properties abetting the highway.<br />
10
ANNEXURE - II<br />
In case where common properties are to be located with assistance from local bodies<br />
there project authority will provide replacement cost <strong>of</strong> the common properties to these<br />
bodies. Preparation <strong>of</strong> the drawings and construction <strong>of</strong> CPRs will be included in the Bill <strong>of</strong><br />
Quantities <strong>of</strong> Contractor.<br />
Disposal <strong>of</strong> Acquired Properties and Eviction <strong>of</strong> the commercial and residential households<br />
The acquired land and properties would vest with the project paying compensation for<br />
such lands / properties. However, the PAPs will be allowed to take away the materials<br />
salvaged from their houses and shops etc. A notice to that effect will be issued to take<br />
away the materials so salvaged within 48 hours <strong>of</strong> their demolition. If the material is not<br />
removed within the stipulated time, then the project authority without giving further notice<br />
will dispose the same.<br />
After the expiry <strong>of</strong> the deadline, project can take action to demolish structures on the<br />
project corridor <strong>of</strong> impact. The project can also evict structures on the corridor <strong>of</strong> impact if<br />
it is established that those were constructed on the ROW after the “cut-<strong>of</strong>f” date. Any<br />
grievances and objections will be referred to the Grievances Redressal Committee.<br />
Resettlement Site<br />
Following procedure will be adopted for selection and development <strong>of</strong> the resettlement<br />
site.<br />
The displaced titleholders and squatters loosing residential/commercial properties may opt<br />
for resettlement sites if they approach project authority in a group <strong>of</strong> 25 in case <strong>of</strong><br />
residential loss and 50 in case <strong>of</strong> commercial loss. The PDPs will be resettled preferably in a<br />
place close to the area where they were residing prior to the project. The resettlement<br />
plan will address the requirement for residential plots <strong>of</strong> all squatters. This will be<br />
implemented on the basis <strong>of</strong> providing options for relocation, which include:<br />
Option 1. Squatters may choose self- relocation with compensation for their structures and<br />
related assistance and,<br />
Option 2. For squatters who are unable to self-relocate, PIU/NGO will examine on a case<br />
by case basis each household’s access and ability to find appropriate replacement land<br />
for dwelling and if they are unable to find or afford land themselves, then project will<br />
provide the required suitable land for this purpose.<br />
In case the group has already identified a potential site, NGO shall visit the site along with<br />
representatives <strong>of</strong> the community for assessing the adequacy and suitability <strong>of</strong> the site.<br />
NGO shall also collect information regarding its title and availability from local revenue<br />
department.<br />
In case the identified land is government/community land, NGO shall have to obtain No<br />
Objection Certificate from Revenue Department.<br />
11
ANNEXURE - II<br />
NGO will also collect information on <strong>Government</strong>/community land available in the vicinity<br />
<strong>of</strong> project road, from the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> Circle Officer/ Circle Inspector.<br />
NGO shall prepare a consolidated village wise list <strong>of</strong> government and community land.<br />
For relocation <strong>of</strong> PDPs, NGO shall ensure that PDPs are relocated along with their peers so<br />
as to maintain the existing social fabric.<br />
Site selection will be assisted from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the impact on host communities.<br />
Issues like land quality, carrying capacity <strong>of</strong> the site, common property resources, social<br />
infrastructure will be considered for selection <strong>of</strong> the site.<br />
Prior to acquisition <strong>of</strong> the land, a resettlement plan will be developed and the consent <strong>of</strong><br />
the PDPs will be taken in writing.<br />
In case where government land is not available the certificate for the same will be<br />
obtained from the District Collector and then project will purchase land for development<br />
<strong>of</strong> resettlement site/shopping complex.<br />
At the new settlement centres, civic amenities like drinking water, internal link roads,<br />
drains, electricity will be provided along with any other amenities with PDPs had at their<br />
abandoned place. Any facilities provided by the government & all common resources<br />
properties being availed by the displaced and affected persons prior to the project will as<br />
far as possible be provided/continued at <strong>Government</strong> cost at the new place <strong>of</strong> their<br />
resettlement.<br />
If the construction <strong>of</strong> shops/houses at the resettlement sites is done through project, then<br />
NGOs will facilitate the process <strong>of</strong> arranging loans for PDPs through financial institutions for<br />
meeting the expenditure <strong>of</strong> the houses/shops over and above the entitlement amount.<br />
The financial institution will provide loan to the individual PDPs, and the loan recovery will<br />
be done by the institution, as per the arrangement agreed between the PDPs and the<br />
financial institution.<br />
The other option will be to do the plotting on the resettlement site and providing<br />
infrastructure facilities. The construction <strong>of</strong> house and shops will then be left the PDPs.<br />
NGO will facilitate the process <strong>of</strong> arranging loans through financial institutions for the PDPs.<br />
Once the site is developed, then the houses/shops/plots will be distributed to the PDPs on<br />
the basis <strong>of</strong> local draw in presence <strong>of</strong> EPs.<br />
As described above, plots for houses/shops at the new resettlement sites will be provided<br />
to the PDPs on payment basis except for the vulnerable person. The allotment <strong>of</strong> plot for<br />
house/shop will be in the joint name <strong>of</strong> husband and wife. Cost <strong>of</strong> registration to that<br />
effect would be borne by the project authority.<br />
Customary right and land tenure system <strong>of</strong> the tribal would be protected. In case tribal<br />
community is affected, Indigenous Peoples Development Plan will be prepared in<br />
accordance with World Bank OP 4.10 (refer annex 1.). Though project roads do not pass<br />
12
ANNEXURE - II<br />
through any scheduled area, still some tribal families may get affected. In <strong>Himachal</strong><br />
<strong>Pradesh</strong> scheduled areas, if tribal land is alienated, panchayat has to provide formal<br />
approval. In non scheduled areas if tribal are affected and mainstreamed, notification will<br />
be provided by the panchayat and gram sabha will be consulted.<br />
13
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project<br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
Mehatpur-Una-AMB<br />
1 MU-L/017 Dehlan 1 Harjeet Singh 3 25 4 3 a<br />
2 MU-L/018 Dehlan 1 Gurmeet Kaur 1 18 4 4 a<br />
3 MU-L/019 Dehlan 1 Avtar Singh Grewal 1 20 4 3 a<br />
4 MU-L/024 Behdala 1 Balwant Singh 1 30 1 4 a<br />
5 MU-L/026 Jalgraon 1 Baldev (Emloyee) 8 (servant)<br />
6 MU-L/027 Jalgraon 1 Shop Closed ( Owner not available )<br />
7 MU-L/028 Jalgraon 1 Som Nath Sharma 1 3 1 4 a<br />
8 MU-L/033 Jalgraon 1 Avtar Singh 1 4 1 4 a<br />
9 MU-L/036 Jalgraon 1 Amar Dass 1 4 1 1 a<br />
10 MU-L/037 Rakkar colony Jalgraon 1 Madan Lal 1 4 1 3 a<br />
11 MU-L/038 Rakkar colony Jalgraon 1 Ravi Kumar 3 6(Months) 1 1 a<br />
12 MU-L/047 UNA 1 Tirath ram 1 4 1 1 a<br />
13 MU-L/048 UNA 1 Ammi Chand 1 5 1 3 a<br />
14 Ua-L/001 Rotryclub Chowk 1 Sanjeev kumar 3 9 1 3 a<br />
15 Ua-L/002 Rotryclub Chowk 1 Ramasra 1 10 1 4 a<br />
16 Ua-L/003 HPPWD Rest house 1 Sunil Kumar 1 15 1 1 c<br />
17 Ua-L/004 HPPWD Rest house 1 Jagat Ram 1 22 1 3 c<br />
18 Ua-L/005 HPPWD Rest house 1 Mohan Lal 3 22 1 3 c<br />
19 Ua-L/009 Kotla Kalan 1 Mannu kumar 8(Employee) Virender Gupta 6 1 4 a<br />
20 Ua-L/011 Lal Singhi 1 Omkar Devi (Too old to respond) 1<br />
21 Ua-L/013 Lal Singhi 1 Jernail singh Bassan 1 12 4(sikh) 3 a<br />
22 Ua-L/017 Jhalera 1 Virender kumar 3 45 1 4 a<br />
23 Ua-L/018 Jhalera 1 Sardari Lal 1 Dev Raj 25 1 4 b<br />
24 Ua-L/019 Jhalera 1 Jagdev Lal 1 Dev Raj 23 1 3 b<br />
25 Ua-L/020 Jhalera 1 Ashwini Kumar 1 Dev Raj 11 1 4 b<br />
26 Ua-L/021 Jhalera 1 Devender kumar 3 45 1 4 a<br />
27 Ua-L/022 Jhalera 1 Permeshwari Dass 1 Dev Raj 27 1 3 b<br />
28 Ua-L/023 Jhalera 1 Balvinder Kumar(Shop Closed) 2 10 1 4 a<br />
29 Ua-L/024 Jhalera 1 Teju Ram (Shop Closed) 10 1 1 c<br />
30 UA-L/002 Upper basal 1 Satpal (owner not available) 1<br />
31 UA-L/003 Upper basal 1 Ramswaroop 3 keher singh 7 1 3 b<br />
32 UA-L/004 Upper basal 1 Ramesh singh 1 20 1 3 a<br />
33 UA-L/005 Upper basal 1 Gyan chand( owner not available) 20 1 3 a<br />
34 UA-L/006 Upper basal 1 prem chand 1 Shadi Lal 15 1 4 b<br />
35 UA-L/007 Upper basal 1 karam chand 1 40 1 3 a<br />
36 UA-L/008 Upper basal 1 Naresh kumar 1 25 1 4 a<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property<br />
37 UA-L/009 Upper basal 1 Mohan Lal 1 Satpal 25 1 3 b<br />
38 UA-L/010 Upper basal 1 Surender kumar 3 Satpal 12 1 3 b<br />
39 UA-L/011 Upper basal 1 Raj kumar 1 20 1 3 a<br />
40 UA-L/012 Lower Basal 1 Ashok kumar 1 25 1 3 a<br />
41 UA-L/013 Lower Basal 1 Raman kumar 3 12 1 3 b<br />
42 UA-L/014 Upper basal 1 Mohinder paul 3 5 1 3 a<br />
43 UA-L/015 Upper basal 1 Surender kumar 1 Krishan chand 7 1 3 b<br />
44 UA-L/016 Upper basal 1 Gagneshwar sharma 3 8 1 4 b<br />
45 UA-L/018 Lower Basal 1 Geeta Devi 1 60 1 3 a<br />
46 UA-L/019 Lower Basal 1 Nika Ram 3 40 1 3 a<br />
47 UA-L/020 Lower Basal 1 Lekh Raj 1 50 1 3 a<br />
48 UA-L/021 Lower Basal 1 Sushma Devi 5 75 1 3 a<br />
49 UA-L/023 Teuri 1 Manohar lal 1 26 1 3 a<br />
50 UA-L/032 Dhusara 1 Ram Prakash(Onwer not present) 1 4 a<br />
51 UA-L/033 Dhusara 1 Bimla Devi 2 40 1 4 a<br />
52 UA-L/034 Dhusara 1 Sanjay Lath 3 35 1 4 a<br />
53 UA-L/058 Baduhi 1 Surender kumar 1 Manju w/o Bhagat 10 1 3 b<br />
54 UA-L/060 Churaru 1 Naveen chaudhary 1 10 1 3 a<br />
55 UA-L/061 Churaru 1 Closed structure ( owner is ont available)<br />
56 UA-L/064 Churaru 1 Suresh kumar 1 20 1 3 a<br />
57 UA-L/065 Churaru 4( abandoned Owner not available<br />
58 UA-L/067 Tandri 1,4(Tube Well Anita Devi 5 50 1 3 a<br />
59 UA-L/068 Tandri 1 Dev Raj 1 95 1 3 a<br />
60 UA-L/069 Nand pur 1 Parmod kumar 4 20 1 3 a<br />
61 UA-L/070 Nand pur 1 Pramod kumar 4 20 1 3 a<br />
62 UA-L/071 Nand pur 1 Parmod kumar 1 20 1 3 a<br />
63 UA-L/072 Nand pur 1 Ashok kumar 1 Parmod kumar 2 1 3 b<br />
64 UA-L/073 Nand pur 1 Joginder singh(owner not available) 10 1 3 a<br />
65 UA-L/074 Nand pur 1 Ashwani kumar 1 20 1 3 a<br />
66 UA-L/077 Nand pur 1 Tripani Dass 3 25 1 3 a<br />
67 UA-L/078 Nand pur 1 Sanjeev kumar 1 10 1 3 a<br />
68 UA-L/079 Nand pur 1 Dilip kumar 1 10 1 3 a<br />
69 UA-L/081 Nand pur 1 Malkeet singh 1 25 1 1 c<br />
70 UA-L/082 Nand pur 1 Taliv 3 Bihari Lal 1 2 4 b<br />
71 UA-L/083 Nand pur 1 Vijay Kumar 1 Bihari Lal 15 1 3 b<br />
72 UA-L/084 Nand pur 1 Jarnail Singh Diwan 1 Bihari Lal 18 1 3 b<br />
73 UA-L/085 Nand pur 1 Bihari lal 1 30 1 3 a
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property<br />
74 UA-L/086 Nand pur 1 Jagdeesh Ram (owner not available) 9 1 3 a<br />
75 UA-L/087 Nand pur 1 Ravinder Kumar Sharma 1 Ravinder kumar D 5 1 4 b<br />
76 UA-L/088 Nand pur 1 Ravinder Devedi 1 12 1 4 a<br />
77 UA-L/089 Nand pur 1 Ashok kumar 1 Dev Raj 12 1 3 a<br />
78 UA-L/090 Nand pur 1 Mulkraj 1 40 1 3 a<br />
79 UA-L/093 Kuthiari 1 Sulochna 5 40 1 3 a<br />
80 UA-L/094 Kuthiari 1 Ram Pyari 2 40 1 3 a<br />
81 UA-L/117 Sham Nagar 1 Raj Kuamar (shop closed ) 1 20 1 4 a<br />
82 UA-L/118 Sham Nagar 1 Mohinder paul (shop closed ) 14 1 4 a<br />
83 UA-L/141 Amb Chowk 1 Sukhdev singh 1 8 1 4 b<br />
84 UA-L/142 Amb Chowk 1 Acher Deen 1 Dharm singh 18 2 4 b<br />
85 UA-L/143 Amb Chowk 1 Vinod kumar 3 46 1 1 a<br />
86 UA-L/144 Amb Chowk 1 Ram Das 1 Prithi Chand 45 1 1 b<br />
87 UA-L/145 Amb Chowk 1 Bhole Shanker 3 Multhan Singh 12 1 3 b<br />
88 UA-L/146 Amb Chowk 1 Ved prakash 1 Shamsher singh 35 1 3 b<br />
89 UA-L/147 Amb Chowk 1 Jagdesh Ram 3 22 1 1 c<br />
90 UA-L/148 Amb Chowk 1 Ram Pal 1 2 1 1 c<br />
Una-Kalkhar<br />
1 U-NER/L-001 Una-Bus Stad 1 Ramesh chand 1 20 1 3 b<br />
2 U-NER/L-007 Railway colony 1 Daleep Chand 1 12 1 3 a<br />
3 U-NER/L-008 Lower Arniala 1 Vinod 1 18 1 3 b<br />
4 U-NER/L-009 Lower Arniala 1 Kuldeep Chand 3 20 1 3 c<br />
5 U-NER/L-010 Lower Arniala 1 Kuldeep Chand 4 brother Ram Rukher 20 1 3 a<br />
6 U-NER/L-011 Lower Arniala 1 Kuldeep Chand 3(son) 20 1 3 a<br />
7 U-NER/L-012 Lower Arniala 1 mohan lal 1 17 1 3 a<br />
8 U-NER/L-014 Ajnoli 1 Prem kumar 1 26 1 4 a<br />
9 U-NER/L-015 V.P.O Ajnoli 1 Ravi shanker 3(son) 5 1 3 a<br />
10 U-NER/L-017 V.P.O Barnoh 1 Phooman Ram 4(brother) 9 1 1 a<br />
11 U-NER/L-018 Samurkalan 1 Asha Devi 2(wife) 50 1 1 a<br />
12 U-NER/L-019 Samarkalan 1 Promila Devi 5 20 1 1 a<br />
13 U-NER/L-022 Samarkalan 1 Pushpa Devi 2(wife) 15 1 4 a<br />
14 U-NER/L-024 Samoor Khurd 1 Ajay Sharma 1 15 4 4 a<br />
15 U-NER/L-028 Amby the bora 1 Kasori Devi 1 17 1 4 a<br />
16 U-NER/L-029 V.P.O Khurain 1 Sanjeev Kumar 3 20 1 4 a<br />
17 U-NER/L-030 Khurvi 1 Ramparkash 1 7 1 4 b
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property<br />
18 U-NER/L-032 V.Po khurnain 1 Karnail singh 3 5 1 1 b<br />
19 U-NER/L-034 Khurwain 1 Shiv kumar 3(son) 10 1 4 a<br />
23 U-NER/L-040 Thanakalan 1 Vipin Kumar P.N.B bank Amar nath 20 b<br />
24 U-NER/L-041 Thanakalan 1 Sharwa kumar 1 8 1 3 b<br />
25 U-NER/L-042 Thanakalan 1 indubala 1 30 1 4 a<br />
26 U-NER/L-043 Thanakalan 1 Suresh rattan 10 1 1 a<br />
27 U-NER/L-044 Thanakalan 1 Ishukumari (Neighbour, Locked Structure) owner not avalable 25 1 1 a<br />
28 U-NER/L-045 Harinagar 1 Kushal kumar 3(son) 40 1 4 a<br />
29 U-NER/L-047 Bangana 1 Jagatram 1 3 1 4 a<br />
30 U-NER/L-048 Bangana 1 Ramesh chand owner not avalable 5 1 4 a<br />
31 U-NER/L-049 Bangana chowk 1 mangatram ownernot available 40 1 4 b<br />
32 U-NER/L-050 Bangana 1 Jhanki devi 1 20 1 4 a<br />
33 U-NER/L-051 Bangana 1 Sukhram closed structure 20 1 4 a<br />
34 U-NER/L-053 Sarian 1 Shaktichand 3 15 1 4 a<br />
35 U-NER/L-054 Sarian 1 Madan sharma 1 12 1 4 a<br />
36 U-NER/L-055 Dhandla 1 Deshraj 1 50 1 4 a<br />
38 U-NER/L-057 Dhandla 1 Sowti Devi 1 50 1 4 a<br />
39 U-NER/L-058 Dhandla 1 Raj Kumar 1 Nandan Lal 13 1 3 b<br />
40 U-NER/L-059 Dhandla 1 Ram Krishan 1 40 1 3 a<br />
41 U-NER/L-060 Dhandla 1 Dev Raj Sharma 1 35 1 4 a<br />
42 U-NER/L-061 Dhandla 1 Babu Ram 1 46 1 4 a<br />
43 U-NER/L-062 Malagarh 1 Jagdeesh Chand 1 9 1 4 a<br />
44 U-NER/L-063 Malagarh 1 Ramesh chand 3 30 1 4 a<br />
45 U-NER/L-065 Ambrera 1 Usha devi 2 5 1 4 a<br />
46 U-NER/L-066 Ambrera 1 kishorilal 10 1 4 a<br />
47 U-NER/L-067 Ambrera 1 Hari Ram 1 8 1 4 a<br />
Gurcharan singh<br />
48 U-NER/L-071 Tanoh 1 Meena 3 V.po Tanoh 2 1 4 b<br />
49 U-NER/L-072 Tanoh 1 Sukhdev singh owner not avalable 20 1 4 a<br />
50 U-NER/L-073 Kehlui 1 Ranvir singh 3 25 1 4 a<br />
51 U-NER/L-074 lathani 1 Baba dharam bharti 1 46 1 4 a<br />
52 U-NER/L-075 lathani 1 jagdish chand 3 6 1 1 b<br />
53 U-NER/L-076 lathani 1 Ranjeet singh Shitish kumar 5 1 3 b<br />
54 U-NER/L-077 lathani 1 Dharam singh 1 5 1 1 b<br />
55 U-NER/L-078 Tiasar 1 Parshotam lal 8(Cousin) 40 1 4 a<br />
Nandgopal bharti<br />
56 U-NER/L-082 Barsar 1 Ramesh chand 1 barsar 5 1 4 b
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property<br />
57 U-NER/L-083 Barsar 1 Kadu Ram 1 14 1 1 c<br />
58 U-NER/L-087 Barsar 1 Krishan lal 1 30 1 4 a<br />
59 U-NER/L-088 Barsar 1 Sagar rinku 1 Prem chand 1 b<br />
60 U-NER/L-089 Barsar 1 Satish kumar 100 1 4 a<br />
61 U-NER/L-090 Barsar 1 Ajay Bhad 3 2 1 4 b<br />
62 U-NER/L-091 Barsar 1 Devraj 1 50 1 4 a<br />
63 U-NER/L-092 Barsar 1 Chamanlal saini 3 Amritlal. Bohra 15 1 4 a<br />
64 U-NER/L-093 Barsar 1 om parkash 1 32 1 4 a<br />
65 U-NER/L-094 Barsar 1 Shyamsunder 3 46 1 4 a<br />
66 U-NER/L-095 Barsar 1 Babni devi closed structure 46 1 1 a<br />
67 U-NER/L-096 Barsar 1 Suresh kumar 1 Bhagwanidevi 2 1 1 b<br />
68 U-NER/L-097 Barsar 1 Bihari lal 1 80 1 4 a<br />
69 U-NER/L-099 Barsar 1 Jagdish chand 1 20 1 4 a<br />
70 U-NER/L-100 Barsar 1 Parasram 60 1 4 a<br />
71 U-NER/L-102 Barsar 1 Rakesh kumar 1 25 1 4 a<br />
72 U-NER/L-103 Barsar 1 Vijay kumar 3 15 1 4 a<br />
73 U-NER/L-104 Barsar(mehere 1 madanlal 1 6 1 4 a<br />
74 U-NER/L-105 Barsar(mehere 1 Bimla devi 2 20 1 4 a<br />
75 U-NER/L-106 Barsar(mehere 1 Bihari lal 1 10 1 4 b<br />
76 U-NER/L-107 Barsar(mehere 1 Raj kumar 3 Tirthram Mandial b 13 1 4 a<br />
77 U-NER/L-108 Mehere 1 Sudesh kumari owner not avalable 10 1 4 a<br />
78 U-NER/L-109 Mehere 1 Kuldeep soni 1 sudeshkumari v.p. 5 1 4 b<br />
79 U-NER/L-110 Barsar 1 Rajender sngh no response 10 1 4 b<br />
80 U-NER/L-111 Barsar 1 Rajender singh kapil 6 1 4 a<br />
81 U-NER/L-112 Barsar 1 Trilok Thakur 1 karan chand barsa 9 1 4 b<br />
82 U-NER/L-113 Barsar 1 Rana vijay kumar meher 12 1 1 b<br />
83 U-NER/L-114 Barsar 1 Shivkumar 1 virender kumar me 6 1 4 b<br />
84 U-NER/L-115 Barsar 1 Arun kumar 1 25 1 4 a<br />
85 U-NER/L-116 Barsar 1 Sanjay Kapil 1 17 1 4 a<br />
86 U-NER/L-117 Barsar 1 Babatex(garments) Locked Structure 4 1 b<br />
87 U-NER/L-118 Barsar 1 Milap Ranna (Locked Structure) 2 1 4 a<br />
88 U-NER/L-119 Barsar Mehre 1 Rakesh kumar 3 Gurcharan singh 1 1 3 b<br />
89 U-NER/L-120 Barsar Mehre 1 Yog Raj sharma (Locked Structure) 2 1 4 b<br />
90 U-NER/L-121 Barsar Mehre 1 Gurvachan Singh (woolen Store) 1 50 1 4 a<br />
91 U-NER/L-122 Barsar Mehre 1 Banku Ram (Locked Structure) Sanjeev Kumar 3 1 4 b<br />
92 U-NER/L-123 Barsar Mehre 1 Shakti chand(Locked Structure) 50 1 4 a<br />
93 U-NER/L-124 Barsar Mehre 1 Rajesh Soni 1 Preetam Chand 5 1 4 b
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property<br />
94 U-NER/L-125 Bhakreri 1 Pushpa Devi 2 70 1 1 a<br />
95 U-NER/L-128 Bhakreri 1 Narender singh (Locked Structure) 15 1 4 a<br />
96 U-NER/L-129 Bhakreri 1 Jagar Nath & Jagat Ram(Locked Structure) 50 1 3 a<br />
97 U-NER/L-133 Banni 1 Nirmla Devi 5 50 1 3 a<br />
98 U-NER/L-134 Banni 1 Urmila Devi 2 25 1 3 a<br />
100 U-NER/L-139 Joal 1 Suresh Kumar 1 70 1 4 a<br />
102 U-NER/L-142 Tikkar Braman 1 Munshi Ram Sharma 1 100 1 4 a<br />
103 U-NER/L-143 Tikkar Braman 1 Sanjeev Kumar(locked structure) 50 1 4 a<br />
104 U-NER/L-144 Tikkar Braman 1 Anupama Sharma 5 40 1 4 a<br />
105 U-NER/L-145 Tikkar Braman 1 Gyana Devi 1 40 1 4 a<br />
106 U-NER/L-146 Tikkar Braman 1 Krishna Devi 2 70 1 4 a<br />
107 U-NER/L-147 Tikkar Braman 1 Promila Devi 5 80 1 4 a<br />
108 U-NER/L-150 Bamblu 1 Ravinder pal (Closed structure) 5 1 4 a<br />
109 U-NER/L-152 Bamblu 1 Dev Raj Sharma 1 50 1 4 a<br />
110 U-NER/L-155 Har 1 Banku Ram 3 5 1 4 a<br />
111 U-NER/L-156 Har 1 Bhabhti Devi (Closed structure) 20 1 4 a<br />
112 U-NER/L-159 Karer 1 Dev Nath (closed structure) 40 1 4 a<br />
113 U-NER/L-160 Karer 1 Jagdeesh Chand (closed structure) 40 1 4 a<br />
114 U-NER/L-161 Patta 1 Kuldeep sharma (closed structure) 10 1 4 a<br />
115 U-NER/L-164 Patta 1 Raj kumar 3 40 1 4 a<br />
116 U-NER/L-166 Jharlog 1 Jagdeesh Kumar 1 40 1 4 a<br />
117 U-NER/L-167 Jharlog 1 kantadevi 2 20 1 4 a<br />
118 U-NER/L-168 Jharlog 1 Milkhi Ram 1 100 1 4 a<br />
119 U-NER/L-170 Jharlog 1 Balwant singh(close structure) 30 1 4 a<br />
120 U-NER/L-174 Ladror Khurd 1 Krishni Devi 2(wife) 25 1 4 a<br />
121 U-NER/L-175 Ladror Khurd 1 Kashmir singh 12 1 4 a<br />
122 U-NER/L-176 Ladror Khurd 1 Rakesh Devi 5 30 1 1 a<br />
123 U-NER/L-179 Bari chowk 1 Subash chand owner not avalable 5 1 4 a<br />
124 U-NER/L-181 Bari chowk 1 Sunil Kumar 3(son) 16 1 4 a<br />
125 U-NER/L-183 Tamroh 1 Dharam singh(locked structure) owner not avalable 10 1 a<br />
126 U-NER/L-186 Tamroh 1 Dina nath(close structure) 40 1 4 a<br />
127 U-NER/L-188 Karotha 1 Kranti Kumar 1 30 1 4 a<br />
128 U-NER/L-190 Karotha 1 closed structure locked structure<br />
129 U-NER/L-192 Mundkhar 1 Kamla devi 1(self) 11 1 4 a<br />
130 U-NER/L-193 Mundkhar 1 Amarnath 1 10 1 1 a<br />
131 U-NER/L-194 Sulgwan 1 Anita devi 1 50 1 1 a<br />
132 U-NER/L-196 kangooghatti 1 Ratni Devi 1 35 1 4 a
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property<br />
133 U-NER/L-197 Bhamla mandi 1 Manohar lal(abndon structure) 40 1 4 a<br />
134 U-NER/L-202 Dhalvan 1 Prem singh 14 1 1 b<br />
135 U-NER/L-204 Dhalvan 1 Seema thakur( locked structure) owner not available 3 1 4 a<br />
136 U-NER/L-205 Dhalvan 1 Gulba ram(locked structure) owner not aailable 15 1 4 a<br />
137 U-NER/L-209 Dhalvan 1 Satya devi 42 1 4 a<br />
138 U-NER/L-211 Maisani 1 Roshanlal 36 1 4 a<br />
139 U-NER/L-222 Sadhiani 1 Lal chand (Response denied) owner not available<br />
140 U-NER/L-223 Sadhiani 1 Vinod kumar 3 Sunder lal 2 1 4 a<br />
141 U-NER/L-229 Gulma (kotlu) 1 Karam singh sharma (locked structure) 50 1 4 a<br />
142 U-NER/L-231 Kanti 1 Locked structure (owner not available)<br />
143 U-NER/L-232 Kanti 1 Raj kumar 3 30 1 4 a<br />
144 U-NER/L-233 Ratti 1 Krishna Devi 2 20 1 4 a<br />
145 U-NER/L-234 Ratti 1 Vinod kumar 1 Om Prakash Sharm 8 1 4 b<br />
146 U-NER/L-235 Ratti 1 Om parkash sharma (locked structure) 1 30 1 4 a<br />
147 UNER/L-236 Banni 1 Usha Devi 2 60 1 1 a<br />
148 UNER/L-237 Banni 1 Surender kumar 1 7 1 3 a<br />
149 UNER/L-238 Banni 1 Vikrant kumar 3 Hukam Singh, Man 3 1 4 b<br />
150 UNER/L-240 Mangroli 1 Jegdish Chand 1 13 1 1 a<br />
151 UNER/L-241 Mangroli 1 Rajesh kumar 3 16 1 4 a<br />
152 UNER/L-242 Somoh 1 Surender kumar 7 1 4 a<br />
153 UNER/L-243 Bumblu 1 Jaginder Pal (Closed Structure) 10 1 1 a<br />
154 UNER/L-244 Bumblu 1 Sowroop (Closed Structure) 7 1 4 a<br />
155 UNER/L-245 Bumblu 1 Pyar Chand 1 50 1 4 a<br />
157 UNER/L-247 Salouni 1 Truck opreator Union Salouni 30<br />
158 UNER/L-248 Salouni 1 Nikka Ram ( Response denied) 25 1 3 a<br />
159 UNER/L-249 Salouni 1 Pradeep kumar 1 15 1 4 b<br />
180 UNER/L-274 Aghar 1 Omkar 3 100 1 4 a<br />
182 UNER/L-276 Patta 1 Nek Lal 3 56 1 4 a<br />
183 UNER/L-277 Patta 1 Keval Chadda(Closed Structure) 20 1 4 a<br />
184 UNER/L-280 Patta 1 Manju Sharma 2 40 1 4 a<br />
185 UNER/L-281 Patta 1 Ashwini kumar 1 20 1 4 a<br />
186 UNER/L-282 Jharlog 1 Asha Devi 5 30 1 3 a<br />
187 UNER/L-283 Ladror 1 Store Closed Structure 15 1 a<br />
188 UNER/L-284 Ladror 1 Pradeep kumar 3 Kamlesh Chand La 5 1 1 b<br />
189 UNER/L-285 Ladror 1 Usha Devi 1 1 1 4 b<br />
190 UNER/L-286 Ladror 1 Amarjeet 1 Kamlesh Chand La 3 1 4 b<br />
191 UNER/L-287 Ladror 1 Surender kumar 1 Kamlesh Chand La 1 1 1 b
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property<br />
192 UNER/L-288 Ladror 1 Inderi Devi 1 56 1 3 a<br />
193 UNER/L-289 Ladror 1 Vijay kumar 1 8 1 4 b<br />
194 UNER/L-290 Ladror 1 Prem Chand 1 15 1 4 a<br />
195 UNER/L-291 Ladror 1 Vikram singh 3 15 1 4 a<br />
196 UNER/L-292 Tanda 1 Tara Devi 1 30 1 4 a<br />
197 UNER/L-293 Khrota 1 Jamna Devi 1 20 1 3 a<br />
198 UNER/L-294 Kangoo Ghati 1 Gyan Chand 1 55 1 4 a<br />
199 UNER/L-295 Kangoo Ghati 1 Kalpna Sharma ( Photo denied) 5 50 1 4 a<br />
200 UNER-JA/L-296Jahu 1 Sushil kumar 7 30 1 4 a<br />
201 UNER-JA/L-297Jahu 1 Subhash Chand 1 50 1 4 a<br />
202 UNER-JA/L-298Jahu 1 Sanjeev kumar 3 150 1 4 a<br />
203 UNER-JA/L-299Jahu 1 Surya Prakash (Owner not available) 40 1 1 a<br />
204 UNER-JA/L-300Jahu 1 Manoj kumar 3 25 1 4 a<br />
205 U NER J/L-301 Jahu 1 Om Prakash 1 Lalit Kumar 1 1 3 a<br />
206 U NER J/L-302 Jahu 1 Rakesh Kumar 3 20 1 4 a<br />
207 U NER J/L-303 Jahu 1 Virender Kumar 1 Rattan Chand 15 1 4 b<br />
208 U NER J/L-304 Jahu 1 Subhash Chand 25 1 3 a<br />
209 U NER J/L-305 Jahu 1 Veena Devi 1 25 1 3 a<br />
210 U NER J/L-306 Jahu 1 Pawan Kumar 1 Ashok Kumar 5 1 3 b<br />
211 U NER J/L-307 Jahu 1 P.N.B. Jahu Sunita Arora 16 b<br />
212 U NER J/L-308 Jahu 1 Beer singh 3 Narender Kumar 15 1 4 b<br />
213 U NER J/L-309 Jahu 1 Narender kumar 1 10 1 4 a<br />
214 U NER J/L-310 Jahu 1 Balvir 3 Madan Lal 3 1 4 a<br />
215 U NER J/L-311 Jahu 1 Kunj Lal 1 Kunta devi 5 1 4 b<br />
216 U NER J/L-312 Jahu 1 Chiranji Lal 1 Amarjeet singh 15 1 1 b<br />
217 U NER J/L-313 Jahu 1 Chander Manni Sharma 1 Narender Sharma 14 1 4 a<br />
218 U NER J/L-314 Jahu 1 Raj Kumar 1 Narender Sharma 3 1 4 a<br />
219 U NER J/L-315 Jahu 1 Jagdeesh Chand 1 12 1 1 a<br />
220 U NER J/L-316 Jahu 1 Ram Murti 1 24 1 4 a<br />
221 U NER J/L-317 Jahu 1 Amar Nath 1 Ram Murti 10 1 1 b<br />
222 U NER J/L-318 Jahu 1 Bhagwan Dass 1 Ram Murti 24 1 1 b<br />
223 U NER J/L-319 Jahu 1 Karam Chand 1 1 1 3 b<br />
224 U NER J/L-320 Jahu 1 Gagan Chand 1 Karam Singh ,Sanj 20 1 4 b<br />
225 U NER J/L-321 Jahu 1 karam Singh 3 12 1 1 a<br />
226 U NER J/L-322 Jahu 1 Anand Parkash 1 Ajeet Singh, Sanje 30 1 4 b<br />
227 U NER J/L-323 Jahu 1 Manoj kumar 1 Ajeet Singh, Sanje 30 1 3 b<br />
228 U NER J/L-324 Jahu 1 Kamal 3 Hans Raj 3 1 3 b
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property<br />
229 U NER J/L-325 Jahu 1 Hans Raj Sharma 1 25 1 4 a<br />
230 U NER J/L-326 Jahu 1 Krishan Chand 1 Hem Raj 5 1 4 b<br />
231 U NER J/L-327 Jahu 1 Jai Lal 3 Hem Raj 9 1 1 b<br />
232 U NER J/L-328 Jahu 1 Praksh Chand 1 Chaman Lal 15 1 4 b<br />
233 U NER J/L-329 Jahu 1<br />
234 U NER J/L-330 Jahu 1 Chaman Lal 3 10 1 4 a<br />
235 U NER J/L-331 Jahu 1 Tara Chand 1 Jeet Ram 8 1 4 b<br />
236 U NER J/L-332 Jahu 1 Daulat Ram (Shiva Rolling Shutter) 1 Lekh Ram 14 1 4 a<br />
237 U NER J/L-333 Jahu 1 Brij Lal 1 30 1 4 a<br />
238 U NER J/L-334 Jahu 1 Suresh Kumar (Closed Structure) 10 1 2 b<br />
239 U NER J/L-335 Jahu 1 Vinod Kumar 1 Brij lal 2 1 4 b<br />
240 U NER J/L-336 Jahu 1 Ajay Kumar 3 Brij lal 11 1 4 b<br />
241 U NER J/L-337 Jahu 1 Kishore Verma 3 Ramesh Kumar 14 1 4 b<br />
242 U NER J/L-338 Jahu 1 Pariyad Ali 3 30 2 4 a<br />
243 U NER J/L-339 Jahu 1 Vatan Singh 1 Lekh Ram 13 1 4 b<br />
244 U NER J/L-340 Jahu 1 Ravi Dass 1 Prem singh 12 1 1 b<br />
245 U NER J/L-341 Jahu 1 Satpal Bhatia 1 ShriRam 5 1 4<br />
246 U NER J/L-342 Jahu 1 Shakti Chandel 1 Sant Ram 4 1 4 b<br />
247 U NER J/L-343 Jahu 1 Saroj Sharma 2 15 1 4 a<br />
248 U NER J/L-344 Jahu 1 Manoj kumar 3 Prem Chand 4 1 4 a<br />
249 U NER J/L-345 Jahu 1 Ashwini Kumar 1 Vijay Kumar 13 1 1 b<br />
250 U NER J/L-346 Jahu 1 Suresh Kumar 3 Pitamber Lal 3 1 4 b<br />
251 U NER J/L-347 Jahu 1 Purshatam (Closed Structure) Pitamber Lal 8 1 4 b<br />
252 U NER J/L-348 Jahu 1 Partap Singh 1 Pitamber Lal 3 1 4 b<br />
253 U NER J/L-349 Jahu 1 Pawan Kumar 1 Pitamber Lal 36 1 4 b<br />
254 U NER J/L-350 Jahu 1 Deepak Gupta 3 Jia Lal 24 1 4 b<br />
255 U NER J/L-351 Jahu 1 Pretam Lal Sharma 1 36 1 4 a<br />
256 U NER J/L-352 Jahu 1 Pretam Chand 1 30 1 1 b<br />
257 U NER J/L-353 Jahu 1 Suresh Kumar 3 28 1 1 a<br />
258 U NER J/L-354 Jahu 1 Manoj kumar 1 Amar Nath 17 1 1 b<br />
259 U NER J/L-355 Jahu 1 Ravi Datt 1 Krishan Chand 14 1 4 b<br />
260 U NER J/L-356 Jahu 1 Sanjay kumar 3 Sunder Ram 5 1 4 b<br />
261 U NER J/L-357 Jahu 1 Sanjay Sharma 3 25 1 4 a<br />
262 U NER J/L-358 Jahu 1 Mahesh Gupta 3 Hans Raj 3 1 4 b<br />
263 U NER J/L-359 Jahu 1 Ashwini Kumar 3 25 1 4 a<br />
264 U NER J/L-360 Jahu, Vil: Bandera,PO:Pan 1 Om Prakash 1 1 1 4 b<br />
265 U NER J/L-361 Jahu,Vill:Tihar, PO: Mehal, 1 Sanjeev Kumar 1 1 1 4 b
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property<br />
266 U NER J/L-362 Jahu 1 Surender Kumar 2 1 4 b<br />
267 U NER J/L-363 Jahu 1 Roshan Lal (Closed Structure) 10 1 4 a<br />
268 U NER J/L-364 Jahu 1 Nand lal Sharma 1 12 1 4 a<br />
269 U NER J/L-365 Jahu 1 Rakesh Kumar 1 Preetam Chand 10 1 4 b<br />
270 U NER J/L-366 Jahu 1 Preetam chand 1 15 1 4 a<br />
271 U NER J/L-367 Jahu 1 Jagdeesh Chand Sharma 1 10 1 4 a<br />
272 U NER J/L-368 Jahu 1 Paar Chand 1 Bran Dass 5 1 1 b<br />
273 U NER J/L-369 Jahu 1 Sanjay kumar 3 Des Raj 4 1 1 b<br />
274 U NER J/L-370 Jahu 1 Des Raj 1 20 1 4 a<br />
275 U NER J/L-371 Jahu 1 Bal Krishan Soni 1 Des Raj 4 1 4 b<br />
276 U NER J/L-372 Jahu 1 Jasham Khan 1 Des Raj 8 2 2 b<br />
277 U NER J/L-373 Jahu 1 Lekh Raj 1 Des Raj 5 1 4 b<br />
278 U NER J/L-374 Jahu 1 Sanjay Kumar Sharma 1 Des Raj 2 1 4 b<br />
279 U NER J/L-375 Jahu 1 Parveen Kumar 1 Des Raj 3 1 1 b<br />
280 U NER J/L-376 Jahu 1 Rakesh Kumar 1 Des Raj 5 1 4 b<br />
281 U NER J/L-377 Jahu 1 kashmir singh (tenant Not available) 1 Vishvajeet 4 1 4 b<br />
282 U NER J/L-378 Jahu 1 Meena devi 2 1 4 4 a<br />
283 U NER J/L-379 Jahu 1 Malkeet singh 1 11 1 4 a<br />
284 U NER J/L-380 Jahu 1 Locked Structure<br />
285 U NER J/L-381 Jahu 1 Ram Rath(Closed Structure) 1 12 1 1 a<br />
286 U NER J/L-382 Jahu 1 Rakesh Kumar 1 Des Raj 5 1 4 b<br />
287 U NER J/L-383 Jahu 1 Sunil Kumar 1 Rattan Chand 18 1 1 b<br />
288 U NER J/L-384 Jahu 1 Om Prakash 1 3 1 4 b<br />
289 U NER J/L-385(Jahu 1 Rajender Kumar 1 20 1 1 a<br />
290 U NER J/L-385(Jahu 1 Manoj kumar 1 20 1 1 a<br />
291 U NER J/L-386 Jahu 1 Purshatam Lal (Closed Structure) 1 12 1 3 a<br />
292 U NER J/L-387 Jahu 1 Pyar Chand Sharma 1 Purshotam lal 5 1 4 b<br />
293 U NER J/L-388 Jahu 1 Subhash Chand 1 Kashi Ram 2 1 4 b<br />
Theog-Rohru<br />
1 TR/L-003 1 Deena Nath 1 13 1 1 a<br />
2 TR/L-005 Chailla 1 Hari Ram 1 Krishan dutt Sharm 25 1 4 b<br />
3 TR/L-006 Chailla 1 Naresh sharma 1 Krishan dutt Sharm 1 1 4 b<br />
4 TR/L-007 Chailla 1 Om Prakash 1 Krishan dutt Sharm 40 1 4 b<br />
5 TR/L-008 Chailla 1 Sheela Devi 2 Krishan dutt Sharm 2 1 4 b<br />
6 TR/L-009 Chailla 1 Hari Shankar Gupta 1 Krishan dutt Sharm5(Month) 1 4 b
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property<br />
7 TR/L-010 Chailla 1 Amit Chauhan 3 50 1 4 a<br />
8 TR/L-011 Chailla 1 D.P.Kashyop 25 b<br />
9 TR/L-012 Chailla 1 Subhash chand 1 Layak Ram 1 4 b<br />
10 TR/L-013 Chailla 1 Partap 1 Bhagat Ram 10 1 4 b<br />
11 TR/L-014 Chailla 1 Seeta Devi 2 Bhagat Ram 10 1 4 b<br />
12 TR/L-015 Chailla 1 Arvind Sood ( Lock Structure)<br />
13 TR/L-016 Chailla 1 Ramesh kumar 1 Ramesh Sharma 7 1 4 b<br />
14 TR/L-017 Chailla 1 Prem singh 1 Ramesh Sharma 4 1 4 b<br />
15 TR/L-018 Chailla 1 Sunil Bhardwaj 1 Gyan Singh verma 3 1 4 b<br />
16 TR/L-019 Chailla 1 Geeta Verma 2 20 1 4 a<br />
17 TR/L-020 Chailla 1 AjayBhardwaj (Medical store) 1 Mathi Devi 9 1 4 b<br />
18 TR/L-022 Koku Nala 1 Durga Nand ( close structure) 1 45 1 4 a<br />
19 TR/L-023 Koku Nala 1 Suresh kumar 3 Durga Nand 4 1 4 b<br />
20 TR/L-024 Chalneir 1 Rajesh Gangta (close structure) 30 1 4 a<br />
21 TR/L-025 Chalneir 1 Madan Gangta , Partap Gangta(close structure) 35 1 4 a<br />
22 TR/L-026 Chalneir 1 Prabha Dyal Sawant (close structure) 30 1<br />
23 TR/L-027 Chalneir 1 Padmu Manchan (Locked structure) 40 1 4 a<br />
24 TR/L-028 Chalneir 1 Raman Sharma (locked structure) 30 1 4 a<br />
25 TR/L-029 Nihari 1 Jaram Singh Thakur 1 Mangat Ram Sawa 7 1 4 b<br />
26 TR/L-030 Nihari 1 Sanjeet Rajanta 1 Mangat Ram Sawa 3 1 4 b<br />
27 TR/L-031 Nihari 1 Mangat Ram (locked structure) 30 1 4 a<br />
28 TR/L-032 Saliana 1 Shakat Ali ( close structure) 1 30 2 3 a<br />
29 TR/L-033 (parshal) Santari Roshan Lal ( locked Structure) 1 a<br />
30 TR/L-036 Parshal 1 Bajrangi Lal 1 Ram Gopal 22 1 4 b<br />
31 TR/L-037 Parshal 1 Ram Gopal (Locked structure) 25 1<br />
32 TR/L-038 Parshal 1 Tailor (closed Structure) 1<br />
33 TR/L-040 Parshal 1 Bhagwan Singh 4 20 1 4 a<br />
34 TR/L-041 Parshal 1 Rajeev Chauhan 3 Bhagwan Singh 6 1 4 b<br />
35 TR/L-042 Parshal 1 Dinesh kumar 3 Bhagwan Singh 1 1 1 b<br />
36 TR/L-043 Parshal 1 Ashwani kumar 1 Raghuwir Singh 3 1 4 b<br />
37 TR/L-044 Snabha 1 Ravinder 1 8 1 4 a<br />
38 TR/L-045 Pronthi 1 Pushpa 2 3 1 1 a<br />
39 TR/L-046 Sundli 1 Sudhir Dhauta 3 40 1 4 a<br />
40 TR/L-047 Shari Hari Mandir 1 Locked Structure 1<br />
41 TR/L-048 Shari 1 Locked Structure 1<br />
42 TR/L-049 Dhar Dochi 1 Amar Chand Dhanta( Locked Structure) 1<br />
43 TR/L-050 Gallu 1 Hari Singh 1 Pankaj Khamta 12 1 4 b
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - Left Side<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
SNo<br />
Pap Identity<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project Name <strong>of</strong> the Respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
user <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
property<br />
44 TR/L-051 Pat Sari 1 Gopal singh 1 4 1 4 a<br />
45 TR/L-054 Pat Sari 1 Man Singh 1 Roshan Lal Rakta 1 1 4 b<br />
46 TR/L-055 Pat Sari 1 Roshan Lal ( Response denied) 1 40 1 1 a<br />
47 TR/L-057 Mehndli 1 Kundan Lal 1 Surender Tagta 2 month 1 4 b<br />
48 TR/L-058 Mehndli 1 Pradeep Loota, Ukali -Mehndli panchayat 1 Surender Tagta 1 1 b<br />
49 TR/L-059 Mehndli 1 Vikrant Tegta 3 25 1 4 a<br />
50 TR/L-060 Mehndli 1 Tenant not present or available Surender Tagta 1 1 b<br />
51 TR/L-061 Pronthi 1 Locked Structure
SNo<br />
Pap Identity No<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Structure Details<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
Total Area<br />
Total Area Affected<br />
(SQ. MT.) (SQ. MT.)<br />
Mehatpur-Una-Amb<br />
1 MU-L/017 Semi-Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 26.6 25.08<br />
2 MU-L/018 Pucca 1 1 1 1 1,2,3 23.18 23.18<br />
3 MU-L/019 Pucca 1 8 1 1 21.66 21.66<br />
4 MU-L/024 Kacha 1 8 1 1 2.34 2.34<br />
5 MU-L/026 Pucca 2 2 1 81.7 81.7<br />
6 MU-L/027 Pucca 1 2 3 1 62.62 37.37<br />
7 MU-L/028 Pucca 1 2 3 62.62 37.37<br />
8 MU-L/033 Pucca 1 3 1 1 1 15.12 4.2<br />
9 MU-L/036 Kacha 1 2 1 1 3.36 3.36<br />
10 MU-L/037 Kacha 1 2 1 1 1 3.25 3.25<br />
11 MU-L/038 Kacha 1 2 1 1 8.1 8.1<br />
12 MU-L/047 Kacha 1 2 2.25 0.75<br />
13 MU-L/048 Kacha 1 2 3 1<br />
14 Ua-L/001 Kacha 1 2 1 1 1 12 12<br />
15 Ua-L/002 Kacha 1 2 12 12<br />
16 Ua-L/003 Kacha 1 2 1 1 12 12<br />
17 Ua-L/004 Kacha 1 2 1 12 12<br />
18 Ua-L/005 Kacha 1 2 1 1 12 12<br />
19 Ua-L/009 Pucca 1 2 4 1 1,3 84.93 7.45<br />
20 Ua-L/011 Semi-Pucca 1 32 28<br />
21 Ua-L/013 Pucca 1 2 5 1 1,2,3 44.46 9.69<br />
22 Ua-L/017 Pucca 2 2 1 1 1,2 10 2.5<br />
23 Ua-L/018 Pucca 1 2 1 2 375 1 10 2.5<br />
24 Ua-L/019 Pucca 1 2 1 2 375 1 10 2.5<br />
25 Ua-L/020 Pucca 1 2 1 2 900 1 10 2.5<br />
26 Ua-L/021 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 10 2.5<br />
27 Ua-L/022 Pucca 1 2 1 2 150 1 10 2.5<br />
28 Ua-L/023 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 18 18<br />
29 Ua-L/024 Kacha 1 2 1 1 4 4<br />
30 UA-L/002 Pucca 1 7 1 191.52 13.86<br />
31 UA-L/003 Kacha 1 2 1 2 350 1 15.95 15.95<br />
32 UA-L/004 Pucca 2 8 1 1 33.37 33.37<br />
33 UA-L/005 Semi-Pucca 1 7 2 1 61.56 28.5<br />
34 UA-L/006 Pucca 1 2 2 2 900 1 49.6 37.2<br />
35 UA-L/007 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 26 19.76<br />
36 UA-L/008 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 23.04 18.24<br />
37 UA-L/009 Pucca 1 2 1 2 300 1 16.74 16.74<br />
38 UA-L/010 Pucca 1 2 1 2 550 1,3 15.9 15.9<br />
39 UA-L/011 Pucca 2 2 1 1 1 10.8 10.8<br />
40 UA-L/012 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 11.25 11.25<br />
41 UA-L/013 Pucca 1 2 1 2 800 1 9.45 9.45<br />
42 UA-L/014 Pucca 2 8 1 1 1 21.62 21.62<br />
43 UA-L/015 Pucca 2 2 2 2 600 1 37.17 9.03<br />
44 UA-L/016 Pucca 2 2 2 2 700 1 37.17 9.03<br />
45 UA-L/018 Kacha 1 1 1 1 1 7.92 4.62<br />
46 UA-L/019 Semi-Pucca 1 4 1 1 1 10.75 4.75<br />
47 UA-L/020 Semi-Pucca 1 4 1 172.9 79.04<br />
48 UA-L/021 Pucca 1 1 5 1 1 135.88 11.18<br />
49 UA-L/023 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1,3 17.2 3.2<br />
50 UA-L/032 Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 9 9<br />
51 UA-L/033 Pucca 1 1 5 1 1,2,3 95.2 25.84<br />
52 UA-L/034 Pucca 1 1 7 1 1,2,3 129 27.52<br />
53 UA-L/058 Pucca 1 2 1 2 900 1 16.64 6.76<br />
54 UA-L/060 Pucca 2 1 8 1 1,3 89.06 89.06<br />
55 UA-L/061 Pucca 1 2 3 111.3 12.6<br />
56 UA-L/064 Pucca 1 3 2 1 1 15.99 2.34<br />
57 UA-L/065 Pucca 1 115.37 14.82<br />
58 UA-L/067 Pucca 1 1 3 1 1,2,3 38.64 12.42<br />
59 UA-L/068 Semi-Pucca 1 1 3 1 1 61.1 45.12<br />
60 UA-L/069 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1,2 41.48 21.96<br />
61 UA-L/070 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1,2 46.24 24.48<br />
62 UA-L/071 Pucca 2 2 2 1 1,2 46.24 26.52<br />
63 UA-L/072 Pucca 1 2 2 2 700 1 46.24 26.52<br />
64 UA-L/073 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 29.4 24.6<br />
65 UA-L/074 Pucca 1 3 2 1 1,2 60 51.25<br />
66 UA-L/077 Semi-Pucca 1 4 1 1 1 23.22 23.22<br />
67 UA-L/078 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 20.52 20.52<br />
68 UA-L/079 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 69 40.48<br />
69 UA-L/081 Kacha 1 2 1 5.52 5.52
SNo Pap Identity No<br />
Total Area<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
Total Area Affected<br />
(SQ. MT.) (SQ. MT.)<br />
70 UA-L/082 Pucca 1 2 1 2 600 1 10.24 6.4<br />
71 UA-L/083 Pucca 1 2 1 2 700 1 13.5 7.2<br />
72 UA-L/084 Pucca 1 2 1 1 500 1 11.7 5.46<br />
73 UA-L/085 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 11.7 7.28<br />
74 UA-L/086 Pucca 2 3 1 1 46.92 2.55<br />
75 UA-L/087 Pucca 1 2 1 2 600 1 18.6 0.31<br />
76 UA-L/088 Pucca 2 3 2 1,2,3 57.12 1.12<br />
77 UA-L/089 Pucca 1 2 3 2 1500 1 44.55 4.86<br />
78 UA-L/090 Kacha 1 2 1 1 17.64 8.12<br />
79 UA-L/093 Semi-Pucca 1 1 1 1 1 10.66 10.66<br />
80 UA-L/094 Semi-Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 89.3 4.75<br />
81 UA-L/117 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 13.33 13.33<br />
82 UA-L/118 Pucca 1 3 4 1 1 86.1 34.44<br />
83 UA-L/141 Kacha 1 2 1 2 600 5.76 3.12<br />
84 UA-L/142 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 5.51 5.51<br />
85 UA-L/143 Pucca 2 2 4 1 1,3 48.99 12.42<br />
86 UA-L/144 Kacha 1 2 1 2 100 1 20.3 16.45<br />
87 UA-L/145 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 200 1 17.02 17.02<br />
88 UA-L/146 Kacha 1 2 1 2 200 9.6 4.6<br />
89 UA-L/147 Kacha 1 2 3.96 3.96<br />
90 UA-L/148 Kacha 1 2 7.2 3.45<br />
Una-Kalkhar<br />
1 U-NER/L-001 Kacha 1 2 1 2 300 4 4<br />
2 U-NER/L-007 Pucca 1 3 5 1 1,2,3 182.85 47.7<br />
3 U-NER/L-008 Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 15.6 9<br />
4 U-NER/L-009 Pucca 1 2 1 500 1 12 15.6 9<br />
5 U-NER/L-010 Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 15.6 9<br />
6 U-NER/L-011 Semi-Pucca 1 4 1 1 1 22.5 10<br />
7 U-NER/L-012 Pucca 1 3 2 1 1 17.5 6.3<br />
8 U-NER/L-014 Pucca 1 3 1 1 1.2 154 21<br />
9 U-NER/L-015 Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 49.8 15<br />
10 U-NER/L-017 Pucca 1 2 3 1 1 171.2 18.19<br />
11 U-NER/L-018 Kacha 1 8 1 1 1 27.52 23.68<br />
12 U-NER/L-019 Pucca 1 1 2 1 1,2,3 45.6 8.16<br />
14 U-NER/L-022 Pucca 1 1 4 1 120.35 71.05<br />
16 U-NER/L-024 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 1,2 108.3 15.96<br />
18 U-NER/L-028 Pucca 1 1 2 1.2 26.24 11.52<br />
19 U-NER/L-029 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1,2,3 11 3.52<br />
20 U-NER/L-030 Kacha 1 8 1 250 1 5.5 18.4 16.1<br />
21 U-NER/L-032 Pucca 1 2 1 2 400 1 5.75 5.75<br />
22 U-NER/L-034 Pucca 1 3 1 1,3 53.28 16.28<br />
26 U-NER/L-040 Pucca 1 2 2 2 2200 1,3 159.6 44.1<br />
27 U-NER/L-041 Pucca 2 5 1 1 500 85.4 1.4<br />
28 U-NER/L-042 Pucca 1 5 266.5 41<br />
29 U-NER/L-043 Pucca 1 5 91.96 3.8<br />
30 U-NER/L-044 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 57 4.75<br />
31 U-NER/L-045 Semi-Pucca 1 8 5 1 1,2,3 203.74 16.7<br />
32 U-NER/L-047 Pucca 1 2 1 79.36 20.48<br />
33 U-NER/L-048 Pucca 1 1 4 1 1,2,3 108.24 7.38<br />
34 U-NER/L-049 Pucca 1 2 2 2 1000 1,2,3 19.52 19.52<br />
35 U-NER/L-050 Pucca 1 8 1 3.45 3.45<br />
36 U-NER/L-051 Pucca 2 2 1 1 23.92 23<br />
37 U-NER/L-053 Semi-Pucca 1 2 5 1 1 55.68 3.48<br />
38 U-NER/L-054 Pucca 1 5 1 25.6 25.6<br />
39 U-NER/L-055 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 40.5 6<br />
41 U-NER/L-057 Semi-Pucca 1 1 10.6 10.6<br />
42 U-NER/L-058 Pucca 2 3 2 2 400 1 28.81 3.87<br />
43 U-NER/L-059 Pucca 1 1 3 1 1,2,3 305.9 13.3<br />
44 U-NER/L-060 Pucca 1 1 4 1 1,2,3 56.4 26.32<br />
45 U-NER/L-061 Semi-Pucca 1 8 6 1 1 117 13<br />
46 U-NER/L-062 Semi-Pucca 1 3 2 1 1 62.83 9.76<br />
47 U-NER/L-063 Pucca 1 2 3 1 1,2,3 48.51 9.45<br />
48 U-NER/L-065 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 21.08 3.4<br />
49 U-NER/L-066 Pucca 1 5 1 1 24.8 12.4<br />
50 U-NER/L-067 Pucca 1 1 4 1 1,3 43.2 18.72<br />
51 U-NER/L-071 Pucca 1 2 1 2 200 5.7 56.8 23.43<br />
52 U-NER/L-072 Pucca 1 2 3 1 1 59.86 3.65<br />
53 U-NER/L-073 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 45.56 13.6<br />
54 U-NER/L-074 Semi-Pucca 1 4 4 1 1,2 141.36 25.84
SNo Pap Identity No<br />
Total Area<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
Total Area Affected<br />
(SQ. MT.) (SQ. MT.)<br />
55 U-NER/L-075 Pucca 1 2 1 2 550 1 31 4.34<br />
56 U-NER/L-076 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1 32 3.84<br />
57 U-NER/L-077 Kacha 1 2 1 2 300 1 5.06 5.06<br />
58 U-NER/L-078 Semi-Pucca 1 2 4 1 1 114.61 4.71<br />
59 U-NER/L-082 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 59.22 6.3<br />
60 U-NER/L-083 Kacha 1 2 4 4<br />
61 U-NER/L-087 Pucca 3 2 1 1 1 25.5 4.2<br />
62 U-NER/L-088 Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 25.5 4.2<br />
63 U-NER/L-089 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 25.5 4.2<br />
64 U-NER/L-090 Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 26.35 4.34<br />
65 U-NER/L-091 Pucca 3 3 2 1 1,2,3 58.5 13<br />
66 U-NER/L-092 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1200 1,3 30.25 8.8<br />
67 U-NER/L-093 Semi-Pucca 2 2 3 1 1,2,3 37.1 4.9<br />
68 U-NER/L-094 Pucca 2 3 3 1 1,2 57.68 8.4<br />
69 U-NER/L-095 Pucca 2 3 2 1 25.75 3.25<br />
70 U-NER/L-096 Pucca 2 2 1 2 400 1 25.75 3<br />
71 U-NER/L-097 Pucca 2 5 1 1,2 51 10.2<br />
72 U-NER/L-099 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 28 4<br />
73 U-NER/L-100 Semi-Pucca 1 1 1 1 33.58 3.68<br />
74 U-NER/L-102 Pucca 1 1 1 7 7<br />
75 U-NER/L-103 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 29.68 1.4<br />
76 U-NER/L-104 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1,2,3 18.2 2.6<br />
77 U-NER/L-105 Pucca 2 2 1 1 1 33.3 2.4<br />
78 U-NER/L-106 Pucca 1 2 2 2 13,000 1,2,3 52.7 2.17<br />
79 U-NER/L-107 Pucca 2 2 1,2 36 2.1<br />
80 U-NER/L-108 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 27.6 5.1<br />
81 U-NER/L-109 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1900 1 27.6 2.4<br />
82 U-NER/L-110 Pucca 1 2 1 2 27.6 1.8<br />
83 U-NER/L-111 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1,2 68.06 20.75<br />
84 U-NER/L-112 Pucca 1 2 1 2 12 1 29.05 7<br />
85 U-NER/L-113 Pucca 2 3 1 2 2000 1 32.8 7.2<br />
86 U-NER/L-114 Pucca 1 2 1 2 2000 1 32.8 7.2<br />
87 U-NER/L-115 Pucca 1 3 3 1 1,2,3 56.76 4.3<br />
88 U-NER/L-116 Pucca 2 3 2 1 1,2 42.9 1.98<br />
89 U-NER/L-117 Pucca 2 3 1 2 2000 1 26.35 23.8<br />
90 U-NER/L-118 Pucca 1 2 1 2 2000 1 76 23.75<br />
91 U-NER/L-119 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 1500 1 24.65 10.15<br />
92 U-NER/L-120 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 200 1 60.8 9.12<br />
93 U-NER/L-121 Semi-Pucca 2 3 3 1 1,2,3 60.8 9.12<br />
94 U-NER/L-122 Pucca 2 3 2 2 1 24 6.9<br />
95 U-NER/L-123 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 24 6.9<br />
96 U-NER/L-124 Pucca 2 3 2 2 2000 1 32 8<br />
97 U-NER/L-125 Kacha 2 1 2 1 1 46 29.9<br />
99 U-NER/L-128 Semi-Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 43.2 21.6<br />
100 U-NER/L-129 Semi-Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 29.92 27.2<br />
101 U-NER/L-133 Pucca 2 1 2 1 1 40.56 12.48<br />
102 U-NER/L-134 Semi-Pucca 2 1 2 1 1 88 22<br />
104 U-NER/L-139 Semi-Pucca 2 1 6 1 1 137.7 15.3<br />
106 U-NER/L-142 Pucca 1 1 6 1 1,2 107.1 54.4<br />
107 U-NER/L-143 Semi-Pucca 1 4 2 1 1 103.18 103.18<br />
108 U-NER/L-144 Pucca 2 1 1 1 1 25.3 25.3<br />
109 U-NER/L-145 Pucca 2 1 1 1 1 31.28 28.52<br />
110 U-NER/L-146 Kacha 1 4 1 32.76 32.76<br />
111 U-NER/L-147 Pucca 2 3 2 1 1 94.3 16.1<br />
112 U-NER/L-150 Pucca 2 1 6 1 1 126.56 34.72<br />
113 U-NER/L-152 Pucca 2 3 5 1 1 30 30<br />
114 U-NER/L-155 Pucca 2 3 2 1 1 81.88 81.88<br />
115 U-NER/L-156 Pucca 1 1 1 1 10.5 0.9<br />
116 U-NER/L-159 Semi-Pucca 1 1 3 1 55.8 55.8<br />
117 U-NER/L-160 Semi-Pucca 2 1 1 1 48 24<br />
118 U-NER/L-161 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 48 48<br />
119 U-NER/L-164 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 24.8 14.26<br />
120 U-NER/L-166 Semi-Pucca 2 1 2 1 1,2 45.5 6.37<br />
121 U-NER/L-167 Semi-Pucca 1 8 1 1 22.5 10<br />
122 U-NER/L-168 Semi-Pucca 2 1 4 1 12,8 84.8 20<br />
123 U-NER/L-170 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 31.9 6.96<br />
124 U-NER/L-174 Pucca 1 1 3 1 1 81 63<br />
125 U-NER/L-175 Pucca 2 2 3 1 1 50.85 33.9<br />
126 U-NER/L-176 Pucca 2 1 3 1 1,2 87.6 62.4<br />
127 U-NER/L-179 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1,2 48.3 17.25<br />
128 U-NER/L-181 Pucca 2 1 3 1 1,2 98.4 16.77
SNo Pap Identity No<br />
Total Area<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
Total Area Affected<br />
(SQ. MT.) (SQ. MT.)<br />
129 U-NER/L-183 Pucca 2 3 3 1 1 157.7 9.96<br />
131 U-NER/L-186 Semi-Pucca 2 1 2 1 1 91.8 2.7<br />
132 U-NER/L-188 Pucca 3 3 1 2 1 1,2 171.6 38.1<br />
133 U-NER/L-190 Pucca 1 2 3 44 5.28<br />
134 U-NER/L-192 Kacha 2 1 2 1 1,2 47.88 14.82<br />
135 U-NER/L-193 Pucca 2 3 4 1 1 60.95 10.6<br />
136 U-NER/L-194 Pucca 2 1 6 1 1,2,3 90.45 40.5<br />
138 U-NER/L-196 Kacha 1 4 3 1 48.5 25.22<br />
139 U-NER/L-197 Pucca 2 1 2 1 1 54 16.56<br />
141 U-NER/L-202 Pucca 1 2 1 1 53.01 3.99<br />
142 U-NER/L-204 Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 37.2 2.8<br />
143 U-NER/L-205 Pucca 2 8 3 1 1 81 40.5<br />
146 U-NER/L-209 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 24.48 24.48<br />
148 U-NER/L-211 Pucca 2 1 4 1 1 82.5 82.5<br />
152 U-NER/L-222 Pucca 1 2 1 2 600 1 42.3 42.3<br />
153 U-NER/L-223 Pucca 3 3 1 2 500 1 42.3 42.3<br />
156 U-NER/L-229 Pucca 2 1 3 1 1 156.4 46<br />
157 U-NER/L-231 Pucca 1 2 4 73.92 73.92<br />
158 U-NER/L-232 Pucca 1 1 4 1 1 69.44 69.44<br />
159 U-NER/L-233 Pucca 2 3 4 1 1 101.4 37.44<br />
160 U-NER/L-234 Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 30 4.2<br />
161 U-NER/L-235 Pucca 2 3 3 1 1 60 14.4<br />
162 UNER/L-236 Semi-Pucca 2 3 3 1 1 75.35 24.66<br />
163 UNER/L-237 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 27.26 9.87<br />
164 UNER/L-238 Pucca 1 2 1 2 900 1 101.48 8.6<br />
165 UNER/L-240 Pucca 1 1 1 5.44 5.44<br />
166 UNER/L-241 Pucca 2 1 3 1 1 200.96 12.56<br />
167 UNER/L-242 Pucca 1 3 3 1 1 114 15.2<br />
168 UNER/L-243 Pucca 2 2 2 1 1 37.44 5.28<br />
169 UNER/L-244 Pucca 1 2 3 66.3 10.2<br />
170 UNER/L-245 Pucca 2 2 3 1 1 88 27.5<br />
172 UNER/L-247 Pucca 2 2 2 1 73.92 6.6<br />
173 UNER/L-248 Pucca 1 2 1 1 92.96 34.86<br />
174 UNER/L-249 Pucca 2 2 1 2 1000 1 39 19.5<br />
198 UNER/L-274 Pucca 2 4 4 1 1 69.7 68<br />
200 UNER/L-276 Pucca 3 2 9 1 1,2,3 324.5 70.8<br />
201 UNER/L-277 Pucca 1 5 1 151.8 27.6<br />
202 UNER/L-280 Pucca 2 3 4 1 1,2,3 90.25 22.8<br />
203 UNER/L-281 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 52.2 16.24<br />
204 UNER/L-282 Pucca 2 1 2 1 1 76.8 19.2<br />
205 UNER/L-283 Pucca 1 2 1 1 26 49.4<br />
206 UNER/L-284 Pucca 1 2 1 2 250 1 14.4 14.4<br />
207 UNER/L-285 Pucca 2 2 1 2 600 1 17.28 17.28<br />
208 UNER/L-286 Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 17.76 17.76<br />
209 UNER/L-287 Pucca 1 2 1 2 800 1 20.16 20.16<br />
210 UNER/L-288 Pucca 2 2 1 1 1,2,3 18.24 18.24<br />
211 UNER/L-289 Pucca 1 2 1 2 600 1 20.64 20.64<br />
212 UNER/L-290 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 59.5 19.04<br />
213 UNER/L-291 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 49.4 49.4<br />
214 UNER/L-292 Semi-Pucca 1 4 1 1 1 22.95 22.95<br />
215 UNER/L-293 Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 57.72 34.04<br />
216 UNER/L-294 Semi-Pucca 2 1 4 1 1 109.34 2.8<br />
217 UNER/L-295 Semi-Pucca 1 4 2 1 1 13.5 2.25<br />
218 UNER-JA/L-296 Pucca 2 1 1 1 1 35 2.1<br />
219 UNER-JA/L-297 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 32.64 5.44<br />
220 UNER-JA/L-298 Pucca 2 1 1 1 1 43.2 43.2<br />
221 UNER-JA/L-299 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 34.03 4.51<br />
222 UNER-JA/L-300 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 54.6 3.25<br />
223 U NER J/L-301 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 18 2<br />
224 U NER J/L-302 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 23.8 23.8<br />
225 U NER J/L-303 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1400 1 23.8 23.8<br />
226 U NER J/L-304 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 38.76 38.76<br />
227 U NER J/L-305 Pucca 1 3 2 1 1 111.72 88.92<br />
228 U NER J/L-306 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 5 5<br />
229 U NER J/L-307 Pucca 2 2 1 2 9500 1,3 210 210<br />
230 U NER J/L-308 Semi-Pucca 1 2 2 2 1500 1 39.22 39.22<br />
231 U NER J/L-309 Pucca 2 1 2 1 1,2 39.22 39.22<br />
232 U NER J/L-310 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1500 1 22.2 22.2<br />
233 U NER J/L-311 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1200 1 22.2 22.2<br />
234 U NER J/L-312 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1200 22.2 22.2<br />
235 U NER J/L-313 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1400 19.8 19.8
SNo Pap Identity No<br />
Total Area<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
Total Area Affected<br />
(SQ. MT.) (SQ. MT.)<br />
236 U NER J/L-314 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1500 21.12 21.12<br />
237 U NER J/L-315 Pucca 2 3 2 1 1 26.6 26.6<br />
238 U NER J/L-316 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 44.88 44.88<br />
239 U NER J/L-317 Kacha 1 2 1 800 1 14.52 14.52<br />
240 U NER J/L-318 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 600 1 14.52 14.52<br />
241 U NER J/L-319 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 19.8 19.8<br />
242 U NER J/L-320 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 4 4<br />
243 U NER J/L-321 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 75 75<br />
244 U NER J/L-322 Kacha 1 2 1 2 500 8 8<br />
245 U NER J/L-323 Kacha 1 2 1 2 600 14 14<br />
246 U NER J/L-324 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 19.2 19.2<br />
247 U NER J/L-325 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 10.89 21.12<br />
248 U NER J/L-326 Pucca 1 2 1 2 800 1 19.2 19.2<br />
249 U NER J/L-327 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 19.2 19.2<br />
250 U NER J/L-328 Pucca 1 2 1 2 400 1 9.5 9.5<br />
251 U NER J/L-329 Pucca 1 9.5 9.5<br />
252 U NER J/L-330 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 14 14<br />
253 U NER J/L-331 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1350 1 27.9 27.9<br />
254 U NER J/L-332 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1400 1 28.8 28.8<br />
255 U NER J/L-333 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1,2 27.9 27.9<br />
256 U NER J/L-334 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 27 27<br />
257 U NER J/L-335 Pucca 1 2 1 2 2000 1 57.6 57.6<br />
258 U NER J/L-336 Pucca 1 2 1 2 6000 1 59.4 59.4<br />
259 U NER J/L-337 Pucca 1 2 1 2 3000 1 77.4 77.4<br />
260 U NER J/L-338 Pucca 3 3 1 1 1 30.24 30.24<br />
261 U NER J/L-339 Pucca 1 2 2 2 3500 1,3 35.1 35.1<br />
262 U NER J/L-340 Pucca 1 2 2 2 3000 1 39 39<br />
263 U NER J/L-341 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1700 1 23.4 23.4<br />
264 U NER J/L-342 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1 19.5 19.5<br />
265 U NER J/L-343 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 19.5 19.5<br />
266 U NER J/L-344 Pucca 1 2 1 2 800 1 23.4 23.4<br />
267 U NER J/L-345 Pucca 1 2 1 2 800 1,3 14.82 14.82<br />
268 U NER J/L-346 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1500 45.6 45.6<br />
269 U NER J/L-347 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1 4.32 4.32<br />
270 U NER J/L-348 Pucca 1 2 1 2 2400 1 35 35<br />
271 U NER J/L-349 Pucca 2 3 1 2 2000 1 43.75 43.75<br />
272 U NER J/L-350 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1800 1 45 45<br />
273 U NER J/L-351 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 34.2 34.2<br />
274 U NER J/L-352 Pucca 3 3 1 2 1500 1 25.5 25.5<br />
275 U NER J/L-353 Pucca 3 2 1 1 1 25.5 25.5<br />
276 U NER J/L-354 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 41.6 41.6<br />
277 U NER J/L-355 Pucca 2 3 1 2 1100 1 43.2 43.2<br />
278 U NER J/L-356 Pucca 2 2 1 2 1000 1 41.6 41.6<br />
279 U NER J/L-357 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 44.8 44.8<br />
280 U NER J/L-358 Pucca 2 3 1 2 1500 1 40 40<br />
281 U NER J/L-359 Pucca 2 3 2 1 1 21 21<br />
282 U NER J/L-360 Pucca 1 2 1 2 2500 44.8 44.8<br />
283 U NER J/L-361 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1 26.6 26.6<br />
284 U NER J/L-362 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1500 1 26.6 26.6<br />
285 U NER J/L-363 Pucca 1 8 Store 1 1 1 38 38<br />
286 U NER J/L-364 Pucca 1 2 3 1 1 62.4 62.4<br />
287 U NER J/L-365 Pucca 1 2 2 2 4000 1 96 96<br />
288 U NER J/L-366 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 48 48<br />
289 U NER J/L-367 Pucca 4 3 1 1 1 52.8 52.8<br />
290 U NER J/L-368 Pucca 2 3 2 2 1500 1 20.16 20.16<br />
291 U NER J/L-369 Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 10 10<br />
292 U NER J/L-370 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 16.8 16.8<br />
293 U NER J/L-371 Pucca 1 2 2 2 2000 1 37.96 37.96<br />
294 U NER J/L-372 Pucca 1 2 1 2 600 1 22.4 22.4<br />
295 U NER J/L-373 Pucca 1 2 1 2 300 1 13.2 13.2<br />
296 U NER J/L-374 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 26.4 26.4<br />
297 U NER J/L-375 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1500 1 30.8 30.8<br />
298 U NER J/L-376 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1500 1 29.92 29.92<br />
299 U NER J/L-377 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1500 1 29.04 29.04<br />
300 U NER J/L-378 Pucca 1 2 2 1 51.92 51.92<br />
301 U NER J/L-379 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 24 24<br />
302 U NER J/L-380 Pucca 1 2 1 1 22.75 22.75<br />
303 U NER J/L-381 Pucca 1 2 1 1 67.89 67.89<br />
304 U NER J/L-382 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 14 14<br />
305 U NER J/L-383 Pucca 1 2 2 2 1700 1,3 29.2 29.2<br />
306 U NER J/L-384 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1500 1 26.52 26.52
SNo Pap Identity No<br />
Total Area<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
Total Area Affected<br />
(SQ. MT.) (SQ. MT.)<br />
307 U NER J/L-385(A) Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 50.32 50.32<br />
308 U NER J/L-385(B) Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 50.32 50.32<br />
309 U NER J/L-386 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 40.8 40.8<br />
310 U NER J/L-387 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1300 1,3 27.2 27.2<br />
311 U NER J/L-388 Pucca 1 2 2 2 3000 1 43.52 43.52<br />
Theog-Rohru<br />
1 TR/L-003 Pucca 1 1 4 1 1,2,3 90 90<br />
2 TR/L-005 Pucca 1 2 3 2 2500 1 40.25 3.5<br />
3 TR/L-006 Pucca 1 2 3 2 3500 1 37.62 3.3<br />
4 TR/L-007 Pucca 1 2 2 2 3500 1 39.1 3.4<br />
5 TR/L-008 Pucca 1 2 3 2 3500 1 40.25 3.5<br />
6 TR/L-009 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 7.75 7.75<br />
7 TR/L-010 Pucca 1 3 6 1 1 157.08 7.7<br />
8 TR/L-011 Pucca 2 2 1 2 600 1 71.4 71.4<br />
9 TR/L-012 Kacha 1 3 2 2 450 1 37.62 37.62<br />
10 TR/L-013 Kacha 1 1 1 2 150 1 21 14<br />
11 TR/L-014 Kacha 1 1 1 2 300 1 21 14<br />
12 TR/L-015 Pucca 4 1 4 1 1 72 12<br />
13 TR/L-016 Kacha 2 3 1 2 500 1 13.44 3.6<br />
14 TR/L-017 Kacha 1 2 2 2 900 1 21.84 4.2<br />
15 TR/L-018 Kacha 1 2 2 2 1000 1 24.65 4.35<br />
16 TR/L-019 Pucca 2 3 2 1 1 24.5 5.25<br />
17 TR/L-020 Pucca 1 2 1 2 800 1,3 9.9 4.95<br />
18 TR/L-022 Kacha 3 1 3 1 1 57.2 15.6<br />
19 TR/L-023 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 300 1 16 2.8<br />
20 TR/L-024 Kacha 1 8 1 1 67.86 67.86<br />
21 TR/L-025 Kacha 1 8 1 1 24.84 17.25<br />
22 TR/L-026 Kacha 1 8 2 1 1 22.68 22.68<br />
23 TR/L-027 Semi-Pucca 2 1 4 1 1 69.3 38.5<br />
24 TR/L-028 Kacha 1 8 1 1 1 22.79 22.79<br />
25 TR/L-029 Kacha 1 2 1 2 600 1 25.84 25.84<br />
26 TR/L-030 Kacha 1 2 2 2 1200 1 54.6 54.6<br />
27 TR/L-031 Kacha 1 2 1 1 27.45 27.45<br />
28 TR/L-032 Kacha 1 8 1 1 26.6 26.6<br />
29 TR/L-033 Kacha 1 2 1 1 10.5 10.5<br />
30 TR/L-036 Kacha 1 2 1 2 300 1 8.25 8.25<br />
31 TR/L-037 Kacha 1 2 1 1 1 8.25 8.25<br />
32 TR/L-038 Kacha 1 2 1 2 300 1 8.25 8.25<br />
33 TR/L-040 Kacha 3 3 3 1 1 54 54<br />
34 TR/L-041 Pucca 1 2 3 2 1900 1,3 16.8 16.8<br />
35 TR/L-042 Pucca 1 2 2 2 1500 1 16.8 16.8<br />
36 TR/L-043 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 16.8 16.8<br />
37 TR/L-044 Kacha 1 2 1 1 15.9 2.65<br />
38 TR/L-045 Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 36 30<br />
39 TR/L-046 Kacha 1 2 2 3 1 48.28 48.28<br />
40 TR/L-047 Pucca 4 1 2 1 1 53.55 30.24<br />
41 TR/L-048 Pucca 2 1 4 1 110.7 49.2<br />
42 TR/L-049 Pucca 3 1 4 1 1 120.9 120.9<br />
43 TR/L-050 Kacha 1 3 2 2 500 1 14.82 7.6<br />
44 TR/L-051 Kacha 1 2 1 1 23.6 4.72<br />
45 TR/L-054 Kacha 1 2 1 2 800 1 14.84 14.84<br />
46 TR/L-055 Kacha 1 2 1 1 4 4<br />
47 TR/L-057 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 1 24.75 24.75<br />
48 TR/L-058 Semi-Pucca 1 2 2 3 1 41.6 41.6<br />
49 TR/L-059 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 11.25 11.25<br />
50 TR/L-060 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 400 1 15.75 15.75<br />
51 TR/L-061 Semi-Pucca 2 1 2 1 63.6 21.2
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
Tele<br />
vision<br />
Tape<br />
Recorder Radio<br />
Refri<br />
greator<br />
Tele<br />
Phone Cycles<br />
Three<br />
Wheelers<br />
Two<br />
Wheelers<br />
Four<br />
Wheelers<br />
Cooking<br />
Bus Truck gas<br />
Others<br />
(Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
Mehatpur-Una-Amb<br />
1 MU-L/017 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
2 MU-L/018 1 1 1 1 1<br />
3 MU-L/019 1 1 1<br />
4 MU-L/024<br />
5 MU-L/033 1 1<br />
6 MU-L/036 1 1<br />
7 MU-L/037<br />
8 MU-L/038 1 1 1 1<br />
9 MU-L/047 1 1<br />
10 MU-L/048<br />
11 Ua-L/001 1 1 1 1<br />
12 Ua-L/002 1<br />
13 Ua-L/003 1<br />
14 Ua-L/004<br />
15 Ua-L/005<br />
16 Ua-L/013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
17 Ua-L/017 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
18 Ua-L/018 1 1 1 1<br />
19 Ua-L/019 1 1 1 1<br />
20 Ua-L/020 1 1 1 1 1<br />
21 Ua-L/021 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
22 Ua-L/022 1 1<br />
23 UA-L/002 1 1 1 1<br />
24 UA-L/004 1<br />
25 UA-L/006 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
26 UA-L/007 1<br />
27 UA-L/008 1 1<br />
28 UA-L/009 1 1<br />
29 UA-L/010 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
30 UA-L/011 1 1 1 1 1<br />
31 UA-L/012 1 1 1 1<br />
32 UA-L/013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
33 UA-L/014 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
Tele<br />
vision<br />
Tape<br />
Recorder Radio<br />
Refri<br />
greator<br />
Tele<br />
Phone Cycles<br />
Three<br />
Wheelers<br />
Two<br />
Wheelers<br />
Four<br />
Wheelers<br />
Cooking<br />
Bus Truck gas<br />
Others<br />
(Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
34 UA-L/015 1<br />
35 UA-L/016 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1<br />
36 UA-L/018 1<br />
37 UA-L/019 1 1<br />
38 UA-L/020 1 1 5<br />
39 UA-L/021 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
40 UA-L/023 1 1 1 2 1 1 1<br />
41 UA-L/033 1 1 1 1<br />
42 UA-L/034 1 1 1 1 1<br />
43 UA-L/058 1 1<br />
44 UA-L/060 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
45 UA-L/064 1 1 1<br />
46 UA-L/067 1 1 1<br />
47 UA-L/068 1 1 1 1<br />
48 UA-L/069 1<br />
49 UA-L/070 1<br />
50 UA-L/071 1 1 1 1 1<br />
51 UA-L/072 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
52 UA-L/074 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
53 UA-L/077 1 1 1 1<br />
54 UA-L/078 1 1 1 1 1<br />
55 UA-L/079 1 1 1 1 1<br />
56 UA-L/081 1 1<br />
57 UA-L/082 1 1 1<br />
58 UA-L/083 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
59 UA-L/084 1<br />
60 UA-L/085 1 1 1 1 1<br />
61 UA-L/087 1 1 1<br />
62 UA-L/088 1 1 2 1 2 1<br />
63 UA-L/089 1 1<br />
64 UA-L/090 1 1 1<br />
65 UA-L/093 1 1<br />
66 UA-L/094 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
67 UA-L/141 1 1 1<br />
68 UA-L/142 1 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
Tele<br />
vision<br />
Tape<br />
Recorder Radio<br />
Refri<br />
greator<br />
Tele<br />
Phone Cycles<br />
Three<br />
Wheelers<br />
Two<br />
Wheelers<br />
Four<br />
Wheelers<br />
Cooking<br />
Bus Truck gas<br />
Others<br />
(Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
69 UA-L/143 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
70 UA-L/144 1 1 1 1 1<br />
71 UA-L/145 1 1<br />
72 UA-L/146 1 1 1<br />
73 UA-L/147 1 2 1<br />
74 UA-L/148 1<br />
Una-Kalkhar<br />
1 U-NER/L-001<br />
2 U-NER/L-007 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
3 U-NER/L-008<br />
4 U-NER/L-009 1 1 1 1<br />
5 U-NER/L-010 1<br />
6 U-NER/L-011<br />
7 U-NER/L-012 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
8 U-NER/L-014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
9 U-NER/L-015 1 1 1 1 1<br />
10 U-NER/L-017 1 1 1 1<br />
11 U-NER/L-018<br />
12 U-NER/L-019 1 1 1 1<br />
13 U-NER/L-022<br />
14 U-NER/L-028 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
15 U-NER/L-029 1<br />
16 U-NER/L-030<br />
17 U-NER/L-032 1 1 1 1<br />
18 U-NER/L-034 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
19 U-NER/L-041 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
20 U-NER/L-042 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
21 U-NER/L-045 1 1 1 1<br />
22 U-NER/L-047<br />
23 U-NER/L-049 1<br />
24 U-NER/L-052<br />
25 U-NER/L-053 1 1 1<br />
26 U-NER/L-054 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
Tele<br />
vision<br />
Tape<br />
Recorder Radio<br />
Refri<br />
greator<br />
Tele<br />
Phone Cycles<br />
Three<br />
Wheelers<br />
Two<br />
Wheelers<br />
Four<br />
Wheelers<br />
Cooking<br />
Bus Truck gas<br />
Others<br />
(Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
27 U-NER/L-055 1 1 1 1<br />
28 U-NER/L-057 1 1<br />
29 U-NER/L-058 1 1<br />
30 U-NER/L-059 1 1 1<br />
31 U-NER/L-060 1 1<br />
32 U-NER/L-061 1 1<br />
33 U-NER/L-062 1 1 1 1 1<br />
34 U-NER/L-063 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
35 U-NER/L-065 1 1<br />
36 U-NER/L-066 1<br />
37 U-NER/L-071 1<br />
38 U-NER/L-073 1<br />
39 U-NER/L-074 1<br />
40 U-NER/L-075 1 1<br />
41 U-NER/L-077<br />
42 U-NER/L-078 1 1 1 1 1<br />
43 U-NER/L-082 1<br />
44 U-NER/L-083<br />
45 U-NER/L-087 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
46 U-NER/L-089 1<br />
47 U-NER/L-090 1 1 1<br />
48 U-NER/L-091 1 1 1 1 1<br />
49 U-NER/L-092 1 1 1 1 1<br />
50 U-NER/L-093 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1<br />
51 U-NER/L-094 1 1 1<br />
52 U-NER/L-096 1<br />
53 U-NER/L-097 1 1 1<br />
54 U-NER/L-099 1<br />
55 U-NER/L-102 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
56 U-NER/L-103 1 1 1 1<br />
57 U-NER/L-104 1 1 1 1 1<br />
58 U-NER/L-105 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
59 U-NER/L-106 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
60 U-NER/L-107 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
61 U-NER/L-109 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
Tele<br />
vision<br />
Tape<br />
Recorder Radio<br />
Refri<br />
greator<br />
Tele<br />
Phone Cycles<br />
Three<br />
Wheelers<br />
Two<br />
Wheelers<br />
Four<br />
Wheelers<br />
Cooking<br />
Bus Truck gas<br />
Others<br />
(Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
62 U-NER/L-115 1 1 1<br />
63 U-NER/L-119 1 1 1 1<br />
64 U-NER/L-121 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
65 U-NER/L-124 1 1 1<br />
66 U-NER/L-125 1 1 1<br />
67 U-NER/L-133 1<br />
68 U-NER/L-134 1<br />
69 U-NER/L-139 1<br />
70 U-NER/L-142 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
71 U-NER/L-144 1 1 1<br />
72 U-NER/L-145 1<br />
73 U-NER/L-146<br />
74 U-NER/L-147 1<br />
75 U-NER/L-152 1<br />
76 U-NER/L-155 1<br />
77 U-NER/L-164 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
78 U-NER/L-166 1 1 1 1<br />
79 U-NER/L-167 1 1 1 1<br />
80 U-NER/L-168 1 1 1 1 1<br />
81 U-NER/L-174 1 1 1 1<br />
82 U-NER/L-176 1<br />
83 U-NER/L-181 1 1 1 1 1<br />
84 U-NER/L-183 1<br />
85 U-NER/L-188 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
86 U-NER/L-192 1 1 1 1<br />
87 U-NER/L-193<br />
88 U-NER/L-194 1 1 1 1 1<br />
89 U-NER/L-196<br />
90 U-NER/L-209 1 1 1<br />
91 U-NER/L-211 1 1<br />
92 U-NER/L-223 1 1 1 1 1<br />
93 U-NER/L-232<br />
94 U-NER/L-233 1 1 1 1 1<br />
95 U-NER/L-234 1 1 1 1<br />
96 UNER/L-236 1 1 1 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
Tele<br />
vision<br />
Tape<br />
Recorder Radio<br />
Refri<br />
greator<br />
Tele<br />
Phone Cycles<br />
Three<br />
Wheelers<br />
Two<br />
Wheelers<br />
Four<br />
Wheelers<br />
Cooking<br />
Bus Truck gas<br />
Others<br />
(Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
97 UNER/L-237<br />
98 UNER/L-238 1 1 1 1 1<br />
99 UNER/L-240 1 1 1 1 1<br />
100 UNER/L-241 1 1<br />
101 UNER/L-242<br />
102 UNER/L-245 1 1 1 1<br />
103 UNER/L-249 1 1<br />
104 UNER/L-274 1 1 1 1<br />
105 UNER/L-276 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
106 UNER/L-280 1 1 1 1 1<br />
107 UNER/L-281 1 1 1 1 1<br />
108 UNER/L-282 1 1 1 1<br />
109 UNER/L-284 1 1<br />
110 UNER/L-285 1 1 1 1 1<br />
111 UNER/L-286 1<br />
112 UNER/L-287 1 1 1 1<br />
113 UNER/L-288 1 1 1<br />
114 UNER/L-289 1 1<br />
115 UNER/L-291 1 1<br />
116 UNER/L-292 1 1 1 1<br />
117 UNER/L-293 1 1<br />
118 UNER/L-294 1 1<br />
119 UNER/L-295 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
120 UNER-JA/L-296 1 1 1 1<br />
121 UNER-JA/L-297 1 1 1 1 1<br />
122 UNER-JA/L-298 1 1<br />
123 UNER-JA/L-300 1 1 1 1 1<br />
124 U NER J/L-301<br />
125 U NER J/L-302 1 1 1 1 1<br />
126 U NER J/L-303 1 1 1 1<br />
127 U NER J/L-305 1<br />
128 U NER J/L-306 1 1<br />
129 U NER J/L-308 1 1 1 1<br />
130 U NER J/L-309 1 1<br />
131 U NER J/L-310 1 1 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
Tele<br />
vision<br />
Tape<br />
Recorder Radio<br />
Refri<br />
greator<br />
Tele<br />
Phone Cycles<br />
Three<br />
Wheelers<br />
Two<br />
Wheelers<br />
Four<br />
Wheelers<br />
Cooking<br />
Bus Truck gas<br />
Others<br />
(Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
132 U NER J/L-311 1 1 1 1<br />
133 U NER J/L-312 1 1 1 1 1<br />
134 U NER J/L-313 1 1 1 1<br />
135 U NER J/L-314 1 1 1 1<br />
136 U NER J/L-315 1 1 1 1 1<br />
137 U NER J/L-316 1 1 1 1<br />
138 U NER J/L-317<br />
139 U NER J/L-318 1 1<br />
140 U NER J/L-319<br />
141 U NER J/L-320<br />
142 U NER J/L-321 1 1 1 5 1<br />
143 U NER J/L-322 1 1<br />
144 U NER J/L-323 1 1 1<br />
145 U NER J/L-324 1 1 1<br />
146 U NER J/L-325 1 1 1 1 1<br />
147 U NER J/L-326 1 1<br />
148 U NER J/L-327 1 1 1 1 1<br />
149 U NER J/L-328<br />
150 U NER J/L-330 1 1 1<br />
151 U NER J/L-331 1 1 1 1<br />
152 U NER J/L-332 1 1 1 1 1<br />
153 U NER J/L-333<br />
154 U NER J/L-335 1 1 1 1<br />
155 U NER J/L-336 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
156 U NER J/L-337 1 1 1 1 1<br />
157 U NER J/L-338 1 1 1 1<br />
158 U NER J/L-339 1 1 1 1<br />
159 U NER J/L-340 1 1 1<br />
160 U NER J/L-341 1 1 1 1<br />
161 U NER J/L-342 1 1 1 1 1<br />
162 U NER J/L-343 1 1 1 1<br />
163 U NER J/L-344 1 1 1 1 1<br />
164 U NER J/L-345 1 1 1 1<br />
165 U NER J/L-346 1 1 1 1 1<br />
166 U NER J/L-348 1 1 1 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
Tele<br />
vision<br />
Tape<br />
Recorder Radio<br />
Refri<br />
greator<br />
Tele<br />
Phone Cycles<br />
Three<br />
Wheelers<br />
Two<br />
Wheelers<br />
Four<br />
Wheelers<br />
Cooking<br />
Bus Truck gas<br />
Others<br />
(Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
167 U NER J/L-349 1 1 1<br />
168 U NER J/L-350 1 1 1 1<br />
169 U NER J/L-351 1 1<br />
170 U NER J/L-352<br />
171 U NER J/L-353 1 1 1 1<br />
172 U NER J/L-354<br />
173 U NER J/L-355 1 1 1 1<br />
174 U NER J/L-356 1 1 1 1 1<br />
175 U NER J/L-357 1 1 1 1 1<br />
176 U NER J/L-358 1 1 1 1 1<br />
177 U NER J/L-359 1 1 1 1 1<br />
178 U NER J/L-360 1<br />
179 U NER J/L-361 1<br />
180 U NER J/L-362 1 1 1 1 1<br />
181 U NER J/L-363<br />
182 U NER J/L-364 1 1 1 1 1<br />
183 U NER J/L-365 1 1 1 2 1<br />
184 U NER J/L-366 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
185 U NER J/L-367 1 1 1 1 1<br />
186 U NER J/L-368 1 1 1 1<br />
187 U NER J/L-369 1 1<br />
188 U NER J/L-370 1 1 1<br />
189 U NER J/L-371 1<br />
190 U NER J/L-372<br />
191 U NER J/L-373 1 1<br />
192 U NER J/L-374 1 1 1<br />
193 U NER J/L-375 1 1 1 1 1<br />
194 U NER J/L-376 1 1 1 2 1<br />
195 U NER J/L-378<br />
196 U NER J/L-379 1 1 1<br />
197 U NER J/L-382 1 1 1 2 1<br />
198 U NER J/L-383 1 1 1 1 1<br />
199 U NER J/L-384 1 1 1 1 1<br />
200 U NER J/L-385(A) 1 1 1 1 1<br />
201 U NER J/L-385(B) 1 1 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
Tele<br />
vision<br />
Tape<br />
Recorder Radio<br />
Refri<br />
greator<br />
Tele<br />
Phone Cycles<br />
Three<br />
Wheelers<br />
Two<br />
Wheelers<br />
Four<br />
Wheelers<br />
Cooking<br />
Bus Truck gas<br />
Others<br />
(Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
202 U NER J/L-387 1 1 1 1<br />
203 U NER J/L-388 1 1 1 1<br />
Theog-Rohru<br />
1 TR/L-003 1 1 1<br />
2 TR/L-005 1 1 1<br />
3 TR/L-006 1 1 1 1<br />
4 TR/L-007 1 1 1 1<br />
5 TR/L-008 1 1 1<br />
6 TR/L-009<br />
7 TR/L-010 1 1 1 1<br />
8 TR/L-011<br />
9 TR/L-012 1 1 1<br />
10 TR/L-013 1<br />
11 TR/L-014<br />
12 TR/L-015<br />
13 TR/L-016 1 1 1 1<br />
14 TR/L-017 1 1<br />
15 TR/L-018 1<br />
16 TR/L-019 1 1 1<br />
17 TR/L-020 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
18 TR/L-022<br />
19 TR/L-023 1 1 1<br />
20 TR/L-024<br />
21 TR/L-025<br />
22 TR/L-026<br />
23 TR/L-027<br />
24 TR/L-028<br />
25 TR/L-029 1 1<br />
26 TR/L-030 1<br />
27 TR/L-031<br />
28 TR/L-032<br />
29 TR/L-033<br />
30 TR/L-036 1 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
Tele<br />
vision<br />
Tape<br />
Recorder Radio<br />
Refri<br />
greator<br />
Tele<br />
Phone Cycles<br />
Three<br />
Wheelers<br />
Two<br />
Wheelers<br />
Four<br />
Wheelers<br />
Cooking<br />
Bus Truck gas<br />
Others<br />
(Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
31 TR/L-037<br />
32 TR/L-038<br />
33 TR/L-040 1 1 1<br />
34 TR/L-041 1 1 1 1 1<br />
35 TR/L-042 1 1 1<br />
36 TR/L-043 1 1 1<br />
37 TR/L-044 1 1<br />
38 TR/L-045 1 1 1 1<br />
39 TR/L-046 1 1 1<br />
40 TR/L-047<br />
41 TR/L-048<br />
42 TR/L-049<br />
43 TR/L-050 1 1<br />
44 TR/L-051 1<br />
45 TR/L-054<br />
46 TR/L-055<br />
47 TR/L-057 1<br />
48 TR/L-058<br />
49 TR/L-059 1 1 1<br />
50 TR/L-060<br />
51 TR/L-061
Live Stock Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Buffolows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Sheep<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
Mehatpur-Una-Amb<br />
1 MU-L/017 1<br />
2 MU-L/018<br />
3 MU-L/019<br />
4 MU-L/024<br />
5 MU-L/033 1<br />
6 MU-L/036 1<br />
7 MU-L/037<br />
8 MU-L/038<br />
9 MU-L/047<br />
10 MU-L/048<br />
11 Ua-L/001 1<br />
12 Ua-L/002<br />
13 Ua-L/003<br />
14 Ua-L/004<br />
15 Ua-L/005<br />
16 Ua-L/013 1<br />
17 Ua-L/017<br />
18 Ua-L/018 1<br />
19 Ua-L/019<br />
20 Ua-L/020<br />
21 Ua-L/021<br />
22 Ua-L/022<br />
23 UA-L/002 1<br />
24 UA-L/004 1 2 ox<br />
25 UA-L/006 1<br />
26 UA-L/007 2<br />
27 UA-L/008<br />
28 UA-L/009 1<br />
29 UA-L/010 2 2 calf<br />
30 UA-L/011 1<br />
31 UA-L/012 2<br />
32 UA-L/013 1<br />
33 UA-L/014 2<br />
34 UA-L/015<br />
35 UA-L/016 1 1<br />
36 UA-L/018 2 2 ox<br />
37 UA-L/019 1 4<br />
38 UA-L/020 2<br />
39 UA-L/021<br />
40 UA-L/023 1<br />
41 UA-L/033<br />
42 UA-L/034 1 1<br />
43 UA-L/058 1<br />
44 UA-L/060 1 1<br />
45 UA-L/064<br />
46 UA-L/067 1 1<br />
47 UA-L/068 1<br />
48 UA-L/069 2 2 ox<br />
49 UA-L/070
Live Stock Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Buffolows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Sheep<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
50 UA-L/071 2 2 ox<br />
51 UA-L/072 1 1<br />
52 UA-L/074 2<br />
53 UA-L/077 2<br />
54 UA-L/078 1<br />
55 UA-L/079 1 1<br />
56 UA-L/081<br />
57 UA-L/082 1<br />
58 UA-L/083 3 2 ox<br />
59 UA-L/084<br />
60 UA-L/085 1 2 ox<br />
61 UA-L/087<br />
62 UA-L/088<br />
63 UA-L/089<br />
64 UA-L/090 1<br />
65 UA-L/093<br />
66 UA-L/094 1<br />
67 UA-L/141 2<br />
68 UA-L/142<br />
69 UA-L/143 1<br />
70 UA-L/144 1<br />
71 UA-L/145 2<br />
72 UA-L/146<br />
73 UA-L/147<br />
74 UA-L/148 1<br />
Una-Kalkhar<br />
1 U-NER/L-001<br />
2 U-NER/L-007 2<br />
3 U-NER/L-008<br />
4 U-NER/L-009<br />
5 U-NER/L-010<br />
6 U-NER/L-011<br />
7 U-NER/L-012<br />
8 U-NER/L-014<br />
9 U-NER/L-015<br />
10 U-NER/L-017 2<br />
11 U-NER/L-018<br />
12 U-NER/L-019 2<br />
13 U-NER/L-022 1 2<br />
14 U-NER/L-028 1 2<br />
15 U-NER/L-029<br />
16 U-NER/L-030<br />
17 U-NER/L-032<br />
18 U-NER/L-034 1<br />
19 U-NER/L-041<br />
20 U-NER/L-042<br />
21 U-NER/L-045<br />
22 U-NER/L-047<br />
23 U-NER/L-049
Live Stock Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Buffolows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Sheep<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
24 U-NER/L-052<br />
25 U-NER/L-053<br />
26 U-NER/L-054 1<br />
27 U-NER/L-055<br />
28 U-NER/L-057<br />
29 U-NER/L-058<br />
30 U-NER/L-059<br />
31 U-NER/L-060 1<br />
32 U-NER/L-061<br />
33 U-NER/L-062<br />
34 U-NER/L-063 2 2<br />
35 U-NER/L-065<br />
36 U-NER/L-066<br />
37 U-NER/L-071 1<br />
38 U-NER/L-073<br />
39 U-NER/L-074 2<br />
40 U-NER/L-075<br />
41 U-NER/L-077<br />
42 U-NER/L-078<br />
43 U-NER/L-082 1<br />
44 U-NER/L-083<br />
45 U-NER/L-087<br />
46 U-NER/L-089<br />
47 U-NER/L-090<br />
48 U-NER/L-091<br />
49 U-NER/L-092<br />
50 U-NER/L-093 1<br />
51 U-NER/L-094<br />
52 U-NER/L-096<br />
53 U-NER/L-097<br />
54 U-NER/L-099 2<br />
55 U-NER/L-102<br />
56 U-NER/L-103<br />
57 U-NER/L-104<br />
58 U-NER/L-105<br />
59 U-NER/L-106 2<br />
60 U-NER/L-107<br />
61 U-NER/L-109<br />
62 U-NER/L-115<br />
63 U-NER/L-119<br />
64 U-NER/L-121 1<br />
65 U-NER/L-124<br />
66 U-NER/L-125 2<br />
67 U-NER/L-133 1<br />
68 U-NER/L-134 1<br />
69 U-NER/L-139 1<br />
70 U-NER/L-142 2<br />
71 U-NER/L-144 1<br />
72 U-NER/L-145 1<br />
73 U-NER/L-146 1<br />
74 U-NER/L-147 1
Live Stock Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Buffolows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Sheep<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
75 U-NER/L-152<br />
76 U-NER/L-155<br />
77 U-NER/L-164<br />
78 U-NER/L-166<br />
79 U-NER/L-167<br />
80 U-NER/L-168 1 1<br />
81 U-NER/L-174 1 1<br />
82 U-NER/L-176<br />
83 U-NER/L-181<br />
84 U-NER/L-183 2<br />
85 U-NER/L-188<br />
86 U-NER/L-192<br />
87 U-NER/L-193<br />
88 U-NER/L-194<br />
89 U-NER/L-196<br />
90 U-NER/L-209<br />
91 U-NER/L-211 1 2<br />
92 U-NER/L-223 1<br />
93 U-NER/L-232 1<br />
94 U-NER/L-233 1<br />
95 U-NER/L-234<br />
96 UNER/L-236 1<br />
97 UNER/L-237<br />
98 UNER/L-238<br />
99 UNER/L-240 1<br />
100 UNER/L-241<br />
101 UNER/L-242<br />
102 UNER/L-245 1<br />
103 UNER/L-249<br />
104 UNER/L-274 2 2<br />
105 UNER/L-276 1<br />
106 UNER/L-280<br />
107 UNER/L-281<br />
108 UNER/L-282 1<br />
109 UNER/L-284<br />
110 UNER/L-285<br />
111 UNER/L-286 2<br />
112 UNER/L-287 4<br />
113 UNER/L-288<br />
114 UNER/L-289<br />
115 UNER/L-291 1<br />
116 UNER/L-292<br />
117 UNER/L-293 2<br />
118 UNER/L-294 1 2<br />
119 UNER/L-295 1<br />
120 UNER-JA/L-296 1<br />
121 UNER-JA/L-297<br />
122 UNER-JA/L-298<br />
123 UNER-JA/L-300<br />
124 U NER J/L-301 1<br />
125 U NER J/L-302 1
Live Stock Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Buffolows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Sheep<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
126 U NER J/L-303<br />
127 U NER J/L-305<br />
128 U NER J/L-306 1<br />
129 U NER J/L-308 1 2<br />
130 U NER J/L-309 1<br />
131 U NER J/L-310 1<br />
132 U NER J/L-311<br />
133 U NER J/L-312<br />
134 U NER J/L-313<br />
135 U NER J/L-314 1<br />
136 U NER J/L-315 1<br />
137 U NER J/L-316 1<br />
138 U NER J/L-317<br />
139 U NER J/L-318 1<br />
140 U NER J/L-319<br />
141 U NER J/L-320<br />
142 U NER J/L-321<br />
143 U NER J/L-322<br />
144 U NER J/L-323<br />
145 U NER J/L-324 1<br />
146 U NER J/L-325 1 1<br />
147 U NER J/L-326 1<br />
148 U NER J/L-327 1<br />
149 U NER J/L-328<br />
150 U NER J/L-330 1<br />
151 U NER J/L-331 1 2<br />
152 U NER J/L-332 1<br />
153 U NER J/L-333<br />
154 U NER J/L-335 1<br />
155 U NER J/L-336 3<br />
156 U NER J/L-337<br />
157 U NER J/L-338<br />
158 U NER J/L-339 1<br />
159 U NER J/L-340 1<br />
160 U NER J/L-341<br />
161 U NER J/L-342 1<br />
162 U NER J/L-343<br />
163 U NER J/L-344 1<br />
164 U NER J/L-345<br />
165 U NER J/L-346 1<br />
166 U NER J/L-348 1<br />
167 U NER J/L-349<br />
168 U NER J/L-350<br />
169 U NER J/L-351 1<br />
170 U NER J/L-352 1<br />
171 U NER J/L-353<br />
172 U NER J/L-354 1<br />
173 U NER J/L-355 1<br />
174 U NER J/L-356 1<br />
175 U NER J/L-357<br />
176 U NER J/L-358 1
Live Stock Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Buffolows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Sheep<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
177 U NER J/L-359<br />
178 U NER J/L-360 1<br />
179 U NER J/L-361<br />
180 U NER J/L-362<br />
181 U NER J/L-363<br />
182 U NER J/L-364<br />
183 U NER J/L-365<br />
184 U NER J/L-366<br />
185 U NER J/L-367<br />
186 U NER J/L-368<br />
187 U NER J/L-369<br />
188 U NER J/L-370 1 1<br />
189 U NER J/L-371<br />
190 U NER J/L-372<br />
191 U NER J/L-373 1<br />
192 U NER J/L-374 1<br />
193 U NER J/L-375 1<br />
194 U NER J/L-376 1<br />
195 U NER J/L-378 1<br />
196 U NER J/L-379 1 1<br />
197 U NER J/L-382 1<br />
198 U NER J/L-383<br />
199 U NER J/L-384<br />
200 U NER J/L-385(A) 1<br />
201 U NER J/L-385(B) 2<br />
202 U NER J/L-387 2 1<br />
203 U NER J/L-388<br />
Theog-Rohru<br />
1 TR/L-003 2<br />
2 TR/L-005<br />
3 TR/L-006 2<br />
4 TR/L-007<br />
5 TR/L-008 1<br />
6 TR/L-009<br />
7 TR/L-010 2<br />
8 TR/L-011<br />
9 TR/L-012<br />
10 TR/L-013<br />
11 TR/L-014<br />
12 TR/L-015<br />
13 TR/L-016 1<br />
14 TR/L-017 2 2<br />
15 TR/L-018 1<br />
16 TR/L-019<br />
17 TR/L-020 1<br />
18 TR/L-022<br />
19 TR/L-023<br />
20 TR/L-024<br />
21 TR/L-025
Live Stock Asserts<br />
S. No Pap Identiy No<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Buffolows<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Sheep<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
22 TR/L-026<br />
23 TR/L-027<br />
24 TR/L-028<br />
25 TR/L-029<br />
26 TR/L-030<br />
27 TR/L-031<br />
28 TR/L-032<br />
29 TR/L-033<br />
30 TR/L-036<br />
31 TR/L-037<br />
32 TR/L-038<br />
33 TR/L-040 5 5<br />
34 TR/L-041 2<br />
35 TR/L-042 1<br />
36 TR/L-043<br />
37 TR/L-044 1<br />
38 TR/L-045 1<br />
39 TR/L-046 2<br />
40 TR/L-047<br />
41 TR/L-048<br />
42 TR/L-049<br />
43 TR/L-050 1<br />
44 TR/L-051<br />
45 TR/L-054<br />
46 TR/L-055<br />
47 TR/L-057 1<br />
48 TR/L-058<br />
49 TR/L-059 2<br />
50 TR/L-060<br />
51 TR/L-061
S.no<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Residence getting<br />
affected<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
How Far measure<br />
Commerical Structure<br />
getting affected<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
How Far measure<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
Mehatpur-Una-Amb<br />
1 MU-L/017 1 1 a 2<br />
2 MU-L/018 2 1 a 2<br />
3 MU-L/019 1 1 a 2<br />
4 MU-L/024 1 a 2<br />
5 MU-L/033 1 a 2<br />
6 MU-L/036 1 a 2<br />
7 MU-L/037 1 a 2<br />
8 MU-L/038 1 a 2<br />
9 MU-L/047 2<br />
10 MU-L/048 1 a 2<br />
11 Ua-L/001 1 b 2<br />
12 Ua-L/002 1 a 2<br />
13 Ua-L/003 1 b 2<br />
14 Ua-L/004 1 a 2<br />
15 Ua-L/005 1 a 2<br />
16 Ua-L/013 2 1 a 2<br />
17 Ua-L/017 1 a 2<br />
18 Ua-L/018 2<br />
19 Ua-L/019 2<br />
20 Ua-L/020 2<br />
21 Ua-L/021 1 a 2<br />
22 Ua-L/022 2<br />
23 UA-L/002 2<br />
24 UA-L/004 1 a 2<br />
25 UA-L/006 2<br />
26 UA-L/007 1 b 2<br />
27 UA-L/008 1 c 2<br />
28 UA-L/009 2<br />
29 UA-L/010 2<br />
30 UA-L/011 1 a 2<br />
31 UA-L/012 1 a 2<br />
32 UA-L/013 2<br />
33 UA-L/014 1 a 2<br />
34 UA-L/015 2<br />
35 UA-L/016 2<br />
36 UA-L/018 1 1 a 2<br />
37 UA-L/019 2 1 a 2<br />
38 UA-L/020 1 a 2<br />
39 UA-L/021 2 1 a 2<br />
40 UA-L/023 1 a 2<br />
41 UA-L/033 2 1 a 2<br />
42 UA-L/034 1 1 a 2<br />
43 UA-L/058 2<br />
44 UA-L/060 2 1 a 2<br />
45 UA-L/064 1 a 2<br />
46 UA-L/067 1 1 a 2<br />
47 UA-L/068 2 1 a 2<br />
48 UA-L/069 1 a 2<br />
49 UA-L/070 1 a 2<br />
50 UA-L/071 1 1 a 1 a 2<br />
51 UA-L/072 2<br />
52 UA-L/074 1 a 2<br />
53 UA-L/077 2 1 a 2<br />
54 UA-L/078 1 a 2<br />
55 UA-L/079 1 a 2<br />
56 UA-L/081 1 c 2<br />
57 UA-L/082 2
S.no<br />
Una-Kalkhar<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Residence getting Commerical Structure<br />
affected<br />
getting affected<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
58 UA-L/083 2<br />
59 UA-L/084 2<br />
60 UA-L/085 1 a 2<br />
61 UA-L/087 2<br />
62 UA-L/088 1 1 a 1 a 2<br />
63 UA-L/089 2<br />
64 UA-L/090 1 a 2<br />
65 UA-L/093 2 1 a 2<br />
66 UA-L/094 1 1 a 2<br />
67 UA-L/141 2<br />
68 UA-L/142 2<br />
69 UA-L/143 1 a 2<br />
70 UA-L/144 2<br />
71 UA-L/145 2<br />
72 UA-L/146 2<br />
73 UA-L/147 1 b 2<br />
74 UA-L/148 2<br />
1 U-NER/L-001<br />
2 U-NER/L-007 1 a 1 a 2<br />
3 U-NER/L-008 2<br />
4 U-NER/L-009 2<br />
5 U-NER/L-010 2<br />
6 U-NER/L-011 1 1 a 2<br />
7 U-NER/L-012 2 a 1 a 2<br />
8 U-NER/L-014 2 1 1 2<br />
9 U-NER/L-015 2<br />
10 U-NER/L-017 1 a 2<br />
11 U-NER/L-018 2<br />
12 U-NER/L-019 2 2<br />
13 U-NER/L-022 2<br />
14 U-NER/L-024 2<br />
15 U-NER/L-028 1 a 2<br />
16 U-NER/L-029<br />
17 U-NER/L-030 2<br />
18 U-NER/L-032 2<br />
19 U-NER/L-034 1 a 2<br />
20 U-NER/L-040<br />
21 U-NER/L-041 2<br />
22 U-NER/L-042 2 1 a 2<br />
23 U-NER/L-043<br />
24 U-NER/L-044<br />
25 U-NER/L-045 2 1 2<br />
26 U-NER/L-047 1 a 2<br />
27 U-NER/L-048<br />
28 U-NER/L-049 2 2<br />
29 U-NER/L-050<br />
30 U-NER/L-051<br />
31 U-NER/L-053 1 a 2<br />
32 U-NER/L-054 2 2<br />
33 U-NER/L-055 1 a 2<br />
34 U-NER/L-057 1 a 2<br />
35 U-NER/L-058 2<br />
36 U-NER/L-059 2 1 a 2<br />
37 U-NER/L-060 2 1 a 2<br />
38 U-NER/L-061 1 a 2
S.no<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Residence getting Commerical Structure<br />
affected<br />
getting affected<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
39 U-NER/L-062 2 1 a 1 a<br />
40 U-NER/L-063 2 1 a<br />
41 U-NER/L-065 1 a 2<br />
42 U-NER/L-066 2 1 a 2<br />
43 U-NER/L-071 1 2<br />
44 U-NER/L-072<br />
45 U-NER/L-073 1 a 2<br />
46 U-NER/L-074 2 1 a 2<br />
47 U-NER/L-075 1 2<br />
48 U-NER/L-076<br />
49 U-NER/L-077 2<br />
50 U-NER/L-078 1 a 2<br />
51 U-NER/L-082 2<br />
52 U-NER/L-083 1 a 2<br />
53 U-NER/L-087 1 a 2<br />
54 U-NER/L-088<br />
55 U-NER/L-089 2 1 a 2<br />
56 U-NER/L-090 2<br />
57 U-NER/L-091 2 1 a 1 a 2<br />
58 U-NER/L-092 2<br />
59 U-NER/L-093<br />
60 U-NER/L-094 2 a 1 a<br />
61 U-NER/L-095<br />
62 U-NER/L-096 1 2<br />
63 U-NER/L-097 2 1 a 1 a 2<br />
64 U-NER/L-099 1 2<br />
65 U-NER/L-100<br />
66 U-NER/L-102 1 a 2<br />
67 U-NER/L-103 2 1 a 1 a 2<br />
68 U-NER/L-104 2<br />
69 U-NER/L-105 2 1 a 1 a 2<br />
70 U-NER/L-106 a 2<br />
71 U-NER/L-107 1 a 2<br />
72 U-NER/L-108<br />
73 U-NER/L-109 a 2<br />
74 U-NER/L-110<br />
75 U-NER/L-111<br />
76 U-NER/L-112<br />
77 U-NER/L-113<br />
78 U-NER/L-114 a 2<br />
79 U-NER/L-115 2 a 1 a 2<br />
80 U-NER/L-119<br />
81 U-NER/L-121 2 1 a 1 a<br />
82 U-NER/L-124<br />
83 U-NER/L-125 2 1 b<br />
84 U-NER/L-133 2 1 a<br />
85 U-NER/L-134 2 1 b<br />
86 U-NER/L-139 2 1 a<br />
87 U-NER/L-142 2 1 b<br />
88 U-NER/L-144 2 1 a<br />
89 U-NER/L-145 1 2 b<br />
90 U-NER/L-146 2 1 a<br />
91 U-NER/L-147 2 1 a<br />
92 U-NER/L-152 2 1 a 1 a<br />
93 U-NER/L-155 1 1 a 1 a<br />
94 U-NER/L-164 1 a<br />
95 U-NER/L-166 2 1 a<br />
96 U-NER/L-167 2 1 a
S.no<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Residence getting Commerical Structure<br />
affected<br />
getting affected<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
97 U-NER/L-168 2 1 a 2<br />
98 U-NER/L-169<br />
99 U-NER/L-174 2 1 a 2<br />
100 U-NER/L-175<br />
101 U-NER/L-176 2 1 a 2<br />
102 U-NER/L-181 2 a 2<br />
103 U-NER/L-183 2 1 a 2<br />
104 U-NER/L-186<br />
105 U-NER/L-188 2 1 a 1 a 2<br />
106 U-NER/L-190<br />
107 U-NER/L-192 2 a 2<br />
108 U-NER/L-193 2 1 a 1 a 2<br />
109 U-NER/L-194 a 2<br />
110 U-NER/L-196 2 1 a 2<br />
111 U-NER/L-197<br />
112 U-NER/L-202<br />
113 U-NER/L-204<br />
114 U-NER/L-206<br />
115 U-NER/L-209 2 1 a 1 a 2<br />
116 U-NER/L-211 2 1 a a 2<br />
117 U-NER/L-223<br />
118 U-NER/L-232 2 1 a<br />
119 U-NER/L-233 2 1 a 1 a<br />
120 U-NER/L-234<br />
121 UNER/L-236 2 1 a 1 a 2<br />
122 UNER/L-237 1 a 2<br />
123 UNER/L-238 2<br />
124 UNER/L-240 2 1 a 2<br />
125 UNER/L-241 2 1 a 2<br />
126 UNER/L-242<br />
127 UNER/L-243<br />
128 UNER/L-244<br />
129 UNER/L-245 1 a 2<br />
130 UNER/L-247<br />
131 UNER/L-248<br />
132 UNER/L-249 2<br />
133 UNER/L-274 2 a 2<br />
134 UNER/L-276 1 a 2<br />
135 UNER/L-277<br />
136 UNER/L-280 2 a 2<br />
137 UNER/L-281 1 a 2<br />
138 UNER/L-282 2 a 2<br />
139 UNER/L-283<br />
140 UNER/L-284 2<br />
141 UNER/L-285 2<br />
142 UNER/L-286 2<br />
143 UNER/L-287 2<br />
144 UNER/L-288 2 a 1 a 2<br />
145 UNER/L-289 2<br />
146 UNER/L-290<br />
147 UNER/L-291 1 a 2<br />
148 UNER/L-292 2 a 2<br />
149 UNER/L-293 2 a 2<br />
150 UNER/L-294 2 a 2<br />
151 UNER/L-295 2 a 2<br />
152 UNER-JA/L-296 2 a 2<br />
153 UNER-JA/L-297 1 a 2<br />
154 UNER-JA/L-298 2 a 2
S.no<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Residence getting Commerical Structure<br />
affected<br />
getting affected<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
155 UNER-JA/L-299<br />
156 UNER-JA/L-300 2 a 1 a 2<br />
157 U NER J/L-301<br />
158 U NER J/L-302 2 1 b 1 a<br />
159 U NER J/L-303<br />
160 U NER J/L-304<br />
161 U NER J/L-305 2 1 b 1 b<br />
162 U NER J/L-306<br />
163 U NER J/L-307<br />
164 U NER J/L-308<br />
165 U NER J/L-309 2 1 b<br />
166 U NER J/L-310<br />
167 U NER J/L-311<br />
168 U NER J/L-312<br />
169 U NER J/L-313<br />
170 U NER J/L-314<br />
171 U NER J/L-315 2 1 b 1 b<br />
172 U NER J/L-316 1 a<br />
173 U NER J/L-317<br />
174 U NER J/L-318<br />
175 U NER J/L-319<br />
176 U NER J/L-320<br />
177 U NER J/L-321<br />
178 U NER J/L-322<br />
179 U NER J/L-323<br />
180 U NER J/L-324<br />
181 U NER J/L-325 2 1 b 1 b<br />
182 U NER J/L-326<br />
183 U NER J/L-327<br />
184 U NER J/L-328<br />
185 U NER J/L-329<br />
186 U NER J/L-330<br />
187 U NER J/L-331<br />
188 U NER J/L-332<br />
189 U NER J/L-333 2 1 b 1 b<br />
190 U NER J/L-334<br />
191 U NER J/L-335<br />
192 U NER J/L-336<br />
193 U NER J/L-337<br />
194 U NER J/L-338 2 1 b 1 b<br />
195 U NER J/L-339<br />
196 U NER J/L-340<br />
197 U NER J/L-341<br />
198 U NER J/L-342<br />
199 U NER J/L-343 1 b<br />
200 U NER J/L-344<br />
201 U NER J/L-345<br />
202 U NER J/L-346<br />
203 U NER J/L-347<br />
204 U NER J/L-348<br />
205 U NER J/L-349 a<br />
206 U NER J/L-350<br />
207 U NER J/L-351 2 1 a 1 a<br />
208 U NER J/L-352<br />
209 U NER J/L-353 2 1 b 1 b<br />
210 U NER J/L-354<br />
211 U NER J/L-355<br />
212 U NER J/L-356
S.no<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Residence getting Commerical Structure<br />
affected<br />
getting affected<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
213 U NER J/L-357 2 1 b 1 b<br />
214 U NER J/L-358<br />
215 U NER J/L-359 2 1 b 1 b<br />
216 U NER J/L-360<br />
217 U NER J/L-361<br />
218 U NER J/L-362<br />
219 U NER J/L-363<br />
220 U NER J/L-364 1 b<br />
221 U NER J/L-365<br />
222 U NER J/L-366 a<br />
223 U NER J/L-367<br />
224 U NER J/L-368<br />
225 U NER J/L-369<br />
226 U NER J/L-370 1 b<br />
227 U NER J/L-371<br />
228 U NER J/L-372<br />
229 U NER J/L-373<br />
230 U NER J/L-374<br />
231 U NER J/L-375<br />
232 U NER J/L-376<br />
233 U NER J/L-377<br />
234 U NER J/L-378 1 b<br />
235 U NER J/L-379 1 b<br />
236 U NER J/L-380<br />
237 U NER J/L-381<br />
238 U NER J/L-382<br />
239 U NER J/L-383<br />
240 U NER J/L-384<br />
241 U NER J/L-385(A) 1 b<br />
242 U NER J/L-385(B) 1 b<br />
243 U NER J/L-386<br />
244 U NER J/L-387<br />
245 U NER J/L-388<br />
Theog-Rohru<br />
1 TR/L-003 2 1 a 2<br />
2 TR/L-005 2<br />
3 TR/L-006 2<br />
4 TR/L-007 2<br />
5 TR/L-008 2<br />
6 TR/L-009 2<br />
7 TR/L-010 1 b 2<br />
8 TR/L-011<br />
9 TR/L-012 2<br />
10 TR/L-013 2<br />
11 TR/L-014<br />
12 TR/L-015<br />
13 TR/L-016 2<br />
14 TR/L-017 2<br />
15 TR/L-018 2<br />
16 TR/L-019 2 1 a 1 a 2<br />
17 TR/L-020 2<br />
18 TR/L-022<br />
19 TR/L-023 2<br />
20 TR/L-024<br />
21 TR/L-025<br />
22 TR/L-026
S.no<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Residence getting Commerical Structure<br />
affected<br />
getting affected<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
23 TR/L-027<br />
24 TR/L-028<br />
25 TR/L-029 2<br />
26 TR/L-030 2<br />
27 TR/L-031<br />
28 TR/L-032<br />
29 TR/L-033<br />
30 TR/L-036 2<br />
31 TR/L-037<br />
32 TR/L-038<br />
33 TR/L-040 1 a 2<br />
34 TR/L-041 2<br />
35 TR/L-042 2<br />
36 TR/L-043 2<br />
37 TR/L-044 1 a 2<br />
38 TR/L-045 2 1 a 2<br />
39 TR/L-046 2 1 a 2<br />
40 TR/L-047<br />
41 TR/L-048<br />
42 TR/L-049<br />
43 TR/L-050 2<br />
44 TR/L-051 2 1 a 2<br />
45 TR/L-054 2<br />
46 TR/L-055<br />
47 TR/L-057 2<br />
48 TR/L-058<br />
49 TR/L-059 1 a 2<br />
50 TR/L-060<br />
51 TR/L-061
Pap Identiy<br />
No<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project<br />
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - RHS<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy<br />
S. No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the respondent<br />
Owner Details<br />
Religion<br />
Mehatpur-Una-Amb<br />
1 MU-R/014 Upper Dehlan 1 Baldev singh (closed structure ) 1 25 1 3 a<br />
2 MU-R/015 Upper Dehlan 1 Harjot singh (Employee) 8 Goverdhan singh 10 1 1 b<br />
3 MU-R/016 Upper Dehlan 1 Raj kumar 1 5 1 1 b<br />
4 MU-R/017 Upper Dehlan 1 Devdutt Sharma (owner not available) 1 20 1 4 a<br />
5 MU-R/018 Upper Dehlan 1 Gurnail singh 1 Balvinder Kaur 15 4 3 b<br />
6 MU-R/020 Behdala 1 Kishan Chand 1 20 1 1 a<br />
7 MU-R/030 Jalgraon 1 Santosh (closed structure) 10 1 1 a<br />
8 MU-R/032 Jalgraon 1 Hardev singh 4 60 1 4 a<br />
9 MU-R/034 Tabba 1 Rajinder singh 1 6 1 4 a<br />
10 MU-R/037 Rakkar Colony 1 Pawan kumar 3 Vatan singh 6 1 4 b<br />
11 MU-R/038 Rakkar Colony 1 Vatan singh (owner not available) 1 6 1 4 a<br />
12 MU-R/039 Rakkar Colony 1 Sukhdev Chand 1 Vatan chand 14 1 1 b<br />
13 MU-R/040 Rakkar Colony 1 Pawan kumar 3 Kehar singh Thakur 6 1 4 b<br />
14 MU-R/043 Malhatnagar 1 Sudhir Sharma 3 11 1 4 a<br />
15 MU-R/044 Malhatnagar 1 Ashwani Kumar (Closed Structure) 1 10 1 4 a<br />
16 MU-R/045 Malhatnagar 1 Mohan Lal (Structure closed) 1 10 1 4 a<br />
17 MU-R/046 Malhatnagar 1 Balwant kaur (Closed Structure) 1 12 1 3 a<br />
18 MU-R/047 Malhatnagar 1 Sohan lal (Closed Structure) 1 15 1 3 a<br />
19 MU-R/048 Malhatnagar 1 Sarwan singh 1 11 1 3 a<br />
20 MU-R/049 Malhatnagar 1 Vijay Kumar 3 Rammurti Sharma 1(Month) 1 3 b<br />
21 MU-R/051 Malhatnagar 1 Shankri Devi 1 16 1 3 a<br />
22 MU-R/056 Una Town 1 Dilip Chand 1 9 1 3 a<br />
23 MU-R/057 Una Town 1 Ramji Dass 1 Som Nath 20 1 1 b<br />
24 MU-R/058 Una Town 1 Pawan kumar Sharma 3 Som Nath 20 1 4 b<br />
25 MU-R/059 Una Town 1 Om Prakash 1 Som Nath 5 1 4 b<br />
26 MU-R/060 Una Town 1 Prakash Chand 1 25 1 3 a<br />
27 MU-R/061 Una Town 1 Harjeet singh 1 80 1 3 a<br />
28 MU-R/062 Una Town 1 Pawan Kumar 1 20 1 4 a<br />
29 MU-R/063 Una Town 1 Vijay Kumar 1 20 1 4 a<br />
30 Ua-R/001 HPPWD Rest house 1 Raj kumar 3 20 1 3 a<br />
31 Ua-R/002 Arya Nagar, Amb Road 1 Rajender kumar 3 25 1 3 a<br />
32 Ua-R/003 Umb Road Una 1 Asha Chawla(Response denied) 2 5 1 4 a<br />
33 Ua-R/006 Lal Singhi 1 Suresh Kumar Saini 1 3 1 3 a<br />
34 Ua-R/007 Lal Singhi 1 Rakesh Kumar( Employee) 8 Sham Lal Saini 5 1 4 a<br />
35 Ua-R/008 Lal Singhi 1 Karan singh 3 Kashmiri Lal 3 1 4 b<br />
36 Ua-R/009 Lal Singhi 1 Kashmiri Lal (Owner not available) Kashmiri Lal 6 1 4 a<br />
37 Ua-R/010 Lal Singhi 1 Rajinder Pal 1 6 1 4 a<br />
38 Ua-R/011 Lal Singhi 1 Pradeep Raj Singh 3 5 1 4 a<br />
39 Ua-R/012 Lal Singhi 1 Ram Swaroop 1 Preet pal singh 10 1 4 b<br />
40 Ua-R/013 Lal Singhi 1 Aman Kumar (Locked Structure) Preet pal singh 10 1 4 b<br />
41 Ua-R/014 Lal Singhi 1 Jagdeep singh 9(Nephew) 3 1 4 a<br />
42 Ua-R/016 Lal Singhi 1 Gulgari Lal 1 25 1 3 a<br />
43 Ua-R/017 Lal Singhi 1 Trilok chand Chada 3 4 1 3 a<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
user <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property
S. No<br />
Pap Identiy<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project<br />
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - RHS<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy<br />
44 Ua-R/018 Lal Singhi 1 Gulzar chand 1 12 1 3 a<br />
45 Ua-R/019 Lal Singhi 1 kishore Lal 1 Ram saran 2 1 1 b<br />
46 Ua-R/020 Lal Singhi 1 Ram Sarvan 1 20 1 3 a<br />
47 Ua-R/021 Lal Singhi 1 Naresh kumar 7 1 1 3 a<br />
48 Ua-R/024 Hari Om enterprises V.P.O 1 Veena Sharma W/O Vijay Sharma 2 10 1 4 a<br />
49 Ua-R/025 V.P.O Raisary Una 1 Pawan sharma 1 23 1 4 a<br />
50 Ua-R/026 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Rakesh Kumar 3 Datta Ram 30 1 3 b<br />
51 Ua-R/027 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Kushal chand 3 Datta Ram 30 1 3 b<br />
52 Ua-R/028 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Raman kumar 3 Datta Ram 10 1 4 b<br />
53 Ua-R/029 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Raj kumar 3 Gurdass Ram 13 1 3 b<br />
54 Ua-R/030 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Dharshan Lal (Tenant not available) 1 Gurdass Ram 12 1 3 b<br />
55 Ua-R/031 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Parmashwari Das(Tenant not available) 1 Gurdass Ram 12 1 4 b<br />
56 Ua-R/032 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Ram kumar 1 Gurdass Ram 12 1 4 b<br />
57 Ua-R/033 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Chatanya dass 4 Ram Dass 30 1 4 b<br />
58 Ua-R/034 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Gulgari Lal 1 Ram Dass 14 1 1 b<br />
59 Ua-R/035 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Aseem kumar 3 Ram Dass 3 1 4 b<br />
60 Ua-R/036 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Kuldeep kumar (Tenant not available) 1 Ram Dass 30 1 3 b<br />
61 Ua-R/037 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Puran Chand 1 Tarseem Lal 22 1 3 b<br />
62 Ua-R/038 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Dev Raj 1 6 1 1 b<br />
63 Ua-R/039 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Lal Chand 3 6 1 3 a<br />
64 Ua-R/040 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Subhash Chand 1 Tarseem Lal 22 1 4 b<br />
65 Ua-R/041 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Som Nath Sharma 1 Shanti Devi 20 1 4 b<br />
66 Ua-R/042 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Omkar chand 1 50 1 4 a<br />
67 Ua-R/043 V.P.O Jhalera 1 Surender pal 4 40 1 4 a<br />
68 UA-R/003 Basal Mohalla 1 Anu Singh 5 100 1 3 a<br />
69 UA-R/004 Upper Basal 1 Promi Devi 5<br />
70 UA-R/010 Lower Basal 1 Ravinder Kumar 1 Bahni Devi 10 1 1 b<br />
71 UA-R/011 Lower Basal 1 Subash Chand 3 Bham Ram 5 1 3 b<br />
72 UA-R/012 Lower Basal 1 Banarsi Das 3 23 1 3 a<br />
73 UA-R/013 Upper Basal 1 Dr. Darshan kumar 2 B.PO Basal 20 1 1 b<br />
74 UA-R/014 Lower Basal 1 Banarsi Das 3 60 1 3 a<br />
75 UA-R/015 Lower Basal 1 Payara Singh 1 35 1 3 a<br />
76 UA-R/016 Lower Basal 1 Satya Devi 1 60 1 3 a<br />
77 UA-R/017 Lower Basal 1 Ram Kumar 7 50 1 1 a<br />
78 UA-R/018 Lower Basal 1 Krishna Devi 1 15 1 1 a<br />
79 UA-R/020 Lower Basal 1 60 1 3 a<br />
80 UA-R/023 Teuri 4 Vijay Kumar 1 8 1 3 a<br />
81 UA-R/028 Panoh 1 Vijay Kumar 1 Prem chand V.P o Panoh 20 1 3 b<br />
82 UA-R/029 Panoh 1 Sushil Kumar 3 22 1 4 b<br />
83 UA-R/033 Panoh 1 Jyoti Chaudry 3 12 1 3 b<br />
84 UA-R/034 V.P.O. Panoh 1 Kishan Chand 1 40 1 3 a<br />
85 UA-R/035 V.P.O. Panoh 1 Satish Kumar 3 30 1 3 a<br />
86 UA-R/036 V.P.O. Panoh 1 Dev Raj Saini 1 30 1 3 a<br />
87 UA-R/037 V.P.O. Panoh 1 Tarsem Lal Sharma 1 35 1 4 a<br />
Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
user <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property
S. No<br />
Pap Identiy<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project<br />
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - RHS<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy<br />
88 UA-R/046 V.P.O. Dussara 1 Tilak Raj 1 Diwan Chand 5 1 4 b<br />
89 UA-R/047 V.P.O. Dussara 1 Jaggar Singh (Locked Structure) 15 1 3 a<br />
90 UA-R/050 V.P.O. Bhera 1 Malkeet Singh 1 15 1 3 a<br />
91 UA-R/051 V.P.O.Bhera 1 Surender kaur 2 10 1 3 a<br />
92 UA-R/053 V.P.O.Bhera 1 Ramesh Chand 1 10 1 3 a<br />
93 UA-R/056 V.P.O.Bhera 1 Ranjeet singh 1 Milkit singh 18 1 3 b<br />
94 UA-R/057 V.P.O.Bhera 1 Sham kumar Khanna 3 Vatan chand 35 1 4 b<br />
95 UA-R/064 V.P.O.Dilwan 1 Anil kumar 7 25 1 1 a<br />
96 UA-R/065 V.P.O. Churaru 1 Rajni Kumari 3 5 1 3 a<br />
97 UA-R/066 V.P.O. Churaru 1 Joginder Singh 1 Kewal Singh 10 1 3 b<br />
98 UA-R/067 V.P.O. Churaru 1 Joginder Singh 1 10 1 3 a<br />
99 UA-R/068 V.P.O. Churaru 1 Randheer Singh 1 15 1 3 a<br />
100 UA-R/069 V.P.O. Churaru 1 Som Dutt 3 6 1 3 a<br />
101 UA-R/070 V.P.O. Churaru 1 Jaswinder Kumar 3 16 1 3 a<br />
102 UA-R/072 V.P.O. Churaru 1 Pandit Vijay Kumar (Owner not available ) 2 1 4 a<br />
103 UA-R/076 V.P.O. Tandri 1 Tara Chand 4 10 1 3 a<br />
104 UA-R/077 V.P.O. Tandri 1 Tara Chand 4 20 1 3 a<br />
105 UA-R/078 V.P.O. Nandpur 1 Gulshan Kumar 1 8 1 3 a<br />
106 UA-R/079 V.P.O. Nandpur 1 Bhola Singh (Owner not available ) 15 1 3 a<br />
107 UA-R/085 V.P.O. Nandpur 1 Sehdev Kaundal 1 Neelam Devi 15 1 3 b<br />
108 UA-R/086 V.P.O. Nandpur 1 Rajinder Kumar 1 17 1 3 a<br />
109 UA-R/087 V.P.O. Nandpur 1 Anil kumar 1 1 1 3 a<br />
110 UA-R/088 V.P.O. Nandpur 1 Munish Kumar 3 30 1 3 a<br />
111 UA-R/090 V.P.O. Nandpur 1 Anita Kumari 3 15 1 3 a<br />
112 UA-R/091 V.P.O. Nandpur 1 Summa Devi 2 5 1 3 a<br />
113 UA-R/097 V.P.O. Kathiari 1 Rishi Kumar 3 35 1 3 a<br />
114 UA-R/115 V.P.O. Kattor Khurd 1 Sham lal 1 25 1 1 c<br />
115 UA-R/120 Amb Chowk 1 Ram Swaroop 1 Raman Kumar 1 1 3 b<br />
Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
user <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property<br />
Una - Kalkhar<br />
RHS<br />
1 U NER/R-001 UnaBus Stand 1 Tilak Raj 1 10 1 4 b<br />
2 U NER/R-003 Una Bus Stand 1 Sumit Kumar 8(Employee) Ram Lal 5 1 3 a<br />
3 U NER/R-007 Adarsh Nagar 1 Hari Pal (Locked Structure) 1<br />
4 U NER/R-008 Adarsh Nagar 1 Anil Kumar 1 20 1 3 b<br />
5 U NER/R-009 Adarsh Nagar 1 Rajinder (Tenant not available) 1 b<br />
6 U NER/R-010 Adarsh Nagar 1 Surender Kumar 3 30 1 3 a<br />
7 U NER/R-011 Upper Arniala Una 1 Balwant Singh 1 35 1 3 a<br />
8 U NER/R-012 Upper Arniala Una 1 Mahesh Chander 1 30 1 3 a<br />
9 U NER/R-013 Upper Arniala Una 1 Naresh Kumar 4 30 1 3 a<br />
10 U NER/R-014 Upper Arniala Una 1 Naresh Kumar 1 30 1 3 a<br />
11 U NER/R-016 Upper Arniala Una 1 Ram Singh (Locked Structure) 5 1 3 a<br />
12 U NER/R-017 Upper Kotla Kalan 1 Lakhpreet Singh 3 20 1 3 a
S. No<br />
Pap Identiy<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project<br />
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - RHS<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy<br />
13 U NER/R-018 Upper Kotla Kalan 1 Pappu (Owner not available) 1 15 1 4 a<br />
14 U NER/R-019 Upper Kotla Kalan 1 Pawan Kumar (Locked Structure) 1 1 a<br />
15 U NER/R-020 Upper Kotla Kalan 1 Satish Kumar 3 Gurvachan Singh 5 1 4 b<br />
16 U NER/R-026 Samoor Kalan 1 Harmesh Chand 1 20 1 4 a<br />
18 U NER/R-029 Jogipanga 1 Kamlesh Kumari 5 20 1 3 a<br />
22 U NER/R-041 Thana Kalan 1 Shashi Rattan 2 45 1 1 a<br />
23 U NER/R-042 Thana Kalan 1 Ramesh Chand 3 Kabir Vashisht, Tarsem Vas 2 1 4 b<br />
25 U NER/R-045 Thana Kalan 1 Saroj Bali 2 5 1 4 a<br />
26 U NER/R-046 Hari Nagar 1 Brammi Devi 2 30 1 1 a<br />
27 U NER/R-047 Hari Nagar 1 Abandon Structure 1<br />
28 U NER/R-051 Hari Nagar 1 Kiran Devi 5 20 1 4 a<br />
29 U NER/R-053 Nalwari 1 Thainnu Ram (Locked Structure) 50 1 1 a<br />
30 U NER/R-054 Dumkhar 1 Harnam singh 1 24 1 4 a<br />
31 U NER/R-056 Dumkhar 1 Suresha devi 2 2 1 4 a<br />
32 U NER/R-057 Dumkhar 1 Tarsem Devi 2 60 1 4 a<br />
33 U NER/R-058 Dumkhar 1 Sonu Devi 5 30 1 4 a<br />
34 U NER/R-059 Dumkhar 1 Kashmir singh 1 40 1 4 a<br />
35 U NER/R-060 Dumkhar 1 Savitri Devi 5 4 1 4 a<br />
36 U NER/R-063 Dumkhar 1 Rakesh Kumar 1 Savitri Devi 12 1 4 b<br />
37 U NER/R-064 Dumkhar 1 Rajesh Kumar 3 Savitri Devi 12 1 4 b<br />
38 U NER/R-065 Dumkhar 1 Tilak Raj 3 Kuldeep 8 1 3 b<br />
39 U NER/R-066 Bangana 1 Karam deen 1 25 2 3 a<br />
40 U NER/R-067 Bangana 1 Vinay Kumar 1 Dharam Dass 4 1 4 b<br />
41 U NER/R-068 Bangana 1 Ashok Kumar (Locked Structure) 8(Employee) Ratan Chand 1 4 b<br />
42 U NER/R-069 Bangana 1 Ramesh Chand 1 3 1 4 a<br />
43 U NER/R-070 Bangana 1 Lakhwir singh 1 3 1 4 b<br />
44 U NER/R-071 Bangana 1 Beena (Locked Sructure) Ram Asra 3 1 1 b<br />
45 U NER/R-072 Bangana 1 Om prakash 3 16 1 4 a<br />
46 U NER/R-073 Bangana 1 Chet Ram (Locked Structure) 3month 1 1 b<br />
47 U NER/R-074 Bangana 1 Yash Pal sharma 1 20 1 4 a<br />
48 U NER/R-075 Bangana 1 Govinda (Locked Structure) Pankaj 8 1 b<br />
49 U NER/R-076 Bangana 1 Ramesh Chand 1 6month 1 4 b<br />
50 U NER/R-077 Bangana Katala pind 1 Durgi Devi 1 20 1 4 a<br />
51 U NER/R-078 Bangana Katala pind 1 Sharma (Abandoned Structure) 10 1 4 a<br />
52 U NER/R-082 Dhandla 1 Bhagwanu Devi 2 6 1 4 a<br />
53 U NER/R-083 Dhandla 1 Vipin kumar 3 12 1 1 a<br />
54 U NER/R-092 Kursai 1 Kishori lal (Locked Structure) 1 8 1 4 a<br />
55 U NER/R-095 Lathiani 1 Om prakash 3 50 1 4 a<br />
56 U NER/R-096 Lathiani 1 Kishan chand (Locked Structure) 30 1 4 a<br />
57 U NER/R-097 Tiasar 1 Joginder 1 16 1 4 a<br />
58 U NER/R-098 Barsar 1 Prithvi chand (Locked Structure) 1 20 1 4 a<br />
59 U NER/R-098 Tiasar 1 Krishan chand (Locked Structure) 16 1 4 a<br />
60 U NER/R-099 Tiasar 1 Sheela devi 2 105 1 4 a<br />
61 U NER/R-100 Tiasar 1 Jaswant singh (Locked Structure) 40 1 4 a<br />
Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
user <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property
S. No<br />
Pap Identiy<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project<br />
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - RHS<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy<br />
62 U NER/R-101 Dadiar 1 Desh Raj (Locked Structure) 12 1 4 a<br />
63 U NER/R-102 Barsar 1 Jagdeesh Kumar (Locked Structure) 1 15 1 4 a<br />
64 U NER/R-104 Barsar 1 Chunni Lal 4 110 1 4 a<br />
65 U NER/R-105 Barsar 1 Harvinder singh (Locked Structure) 10 1 4 b<br />
66 U NER/R-106 Barsar 1 Roshan lal 1 25 1 4 a<br />
67 U NER/R-107 Barsar 1 Ramesh Chand 1 20 1 4 a<br />
68 U NER/R-108 Barsar 1 Kuldeep kumar (Tenant not available) Kishan Chand 1 1 4 a<br />
69 U NER/R-109 Barsar 1 Som Raj 1 30 1 4 a<br />
70 U NER/R-110 Barsar 1 Pardeep kumar 1 45 1 4 a<br />
71 U NER/R-111 Barsar 1 Subhash chand 1 10 1 4 a<br />
72 U NER/R-112 Barsar 1 Dharam kumar 3 jagdeesh chand 15 1 4 a<br />
73 U NER/R-113 Barsar 1 Om prakash (Locked Structure) 20 1 4 a<br />
74 U NER/R-114 Barsar 1 Sanjeev Sharma 1 Nirmal Soni 2 1 4 a<br />
75 U NER/R-115 Barsar 1 Ratan chand Rana (closed structure) 1 1 4 a<br />
76 U NER/R-116 Barsar mehere 1 Surinora general store 6 1 4 a<br />
77 U NER/R-117 Barsar mehere 1 Monu (foot ware) Gautam 10 1<br />
78 U NER/R-118 Barsar mehere 1 Rajesh electronics jagannath 16 1 4 a<br />
79 U NER/R-119 Barsar mehere 1 Rajneesh 10 1 4 a<br />
80 U NER/R-120 Barsar mehere 1 Panjab singh 3 75 1 4 a<br />
81 U NER/R-121 Barsar mehere 1 Jaswant singh 1 22 1 1 a<br />
82 U NER/R-123 Barsar mehere 1 Jagdish chand 4 20 1 4 a<br />
83 U NER/R-124 Barsar 1 Mahinder(closed structure) Seeta Ram v.po Barsar Meh 1 1 4 b<br />
84 U NER/R-125 Barsar mehere 1 S.K kapil (locked structure) 16 1 4 a<br />
85 U NER/R-126 Barsar mehere 1 Rajneesh kapil 3(son) 75 1 4 a<br />
86 U NER/R-127 Barsar mehere 1 Anil Mahajan 16 1 4 a<br />
87 U NER/R-128 Barsar mehere 1 Rajneesh Agnihotri 3(son) 50 1 4 a<br />
88 U NER/R-129 Barsar mehere 1 Roshan lal Kapilesh 1(self) 10 1 4 a<br />
89 U NER/R-130 Barsar mehere 1 Garib Dass owner not available 10 1 4 a<br />
90 U NER/R-131 Barsar mehere 1 Seeta Ram Banku Ram & ram swaroop 10 1 4 a<br />
91 U NER/R-132 Barsar mehere 1 om Parkash (locked structure) 10 1 4 a<br />
92 U NER/R-133 Barsar mehere 1 Ravnder pal Dev Prakash 5 1 4 a<br />
93 U NER/R-135 Bhakriri 1 Mayadevi 1 50 1 4 a<br />
94 U NER/R-137 Bhakriri mehere 1 Kuldeep singh 1 70 1 4 a<br />
95 U NER/R-139 Bhakreri 1 Tulsi ram (closed structure) 40 1 3 a<br />
96 U NER/R-140 Bhakreri 1 Narender Singh 40 1 4 a<br />
97 U NER/R-142 Banni 1 Balwir singh 80 1 4 a<br />
99 U NER/R-147 Banni 1 Gulshan kumar 3 Hari chand 5 1 1 b<br />
100 U NER/R-148 Banni 1 Deena nath 1 17 1 4 a<br />
101 U NER/R-149 Banni 1 Kishan chand 1 35 1 4 a<br />
102 U NER/R-150 Banni 1 Ravi kumar 40 1 4 a<br />
103 U NER/R-151 Banni 1 kulwant singh (locked structure) 1 kulwant singh 12 1 3 b<br />
104 U NER/R-152 Banni 1 Sawan dass Sangal 100 1 3 a<br />
105 U NER/R-153 Banni 1 Jindi devi 50 1 3 a<br />
106 U NER/R-154 Banni 1 Pingla devi 2(wife) 50 1 3 a<br />
Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
user <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property
S. No<br />
Pap Identiy<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project<br />
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - RHS<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy<br />
107 U NER/R-155 Banni 1 Kiran Devi 3 40 1 3 a<br />
108 U NER/R-156 Banni 1 Gajjan singh 1 65 1 3 a<br />
109 U NER/R-157 Banni 1 Closed structure 1<br />
110 U NER/R-158 Banni 1 10 1 1 a<br />
111 U NER/R-159 Tikar Brahmana 1 Babu ram 1 15 1 4 a<br />
112 U NER/R-160 Tikar Brahmana 1 Kaushyala devi 40 1 4 a<br />
113 U NER/R-161 Tikar Brahmana 1 Bishan lal 1 60 1 4 a<br />
114 U NER/R-162 Tikar Brahmana 1 Bimla Devi (closed structure) 20 1 4 a<br />
115 U NER/R-163 Tikar Brahmana 1 Raj kumari 2 10 1 4 a<br />
117 U NER/R-166 Har 1 Bhabti Devi (Too old to responsd) 10 1 4 a<br />
119 U NER/R-172 1 Hemraj mukesh kumar,Ashwani kum 26 1 4 a<br />
120 U NER/R-173 Saloni 1 Ajay Sharma 3 40 1 4 a<br />
121 U NER/R-174 Saloni 1 Ajay Ishwar dass 2 1 4 a<br />
122 U NER/R-175 Saloni 1 Madanlal 1 Nandalal 1 1 b<br />
123 U NER/R-176 Saloni 1 Saduram(locked structure) 30 1 4 b<br />
124 U NER/R-177 Shakur khad 1 Balkishan sharma 1 3 1 4 a<br />
125 U NER/R-178 Shakur khad 1 manoharlal 4 1 4 a<br />
126 U NER/R-179 Shakur khad 1 kailash chand 20 1 4 a<br />
127 U NER/R-180 Bhiratri 1 Ramesh Chand(locked structure) 10 1 4 a<br />
128 U NER/R-183 Kothi 1 Rsandhi ram 1 20 1 1 a<br />
129 U NER/R-184 Kothi 1 Ratanlal 20 1 1 a<br />
130 U NER/R-187 Rathwani 1 Rakesh Kumar 15 1 1 a<br />
131 U NER/R-188 Rathwani 1 Amarnath 1 17 1 3 a<br />
132 U NER/R-190 Balokhar 1 Ashwani 1 22 1 4 a<br />
133 U NER/R-191 Balokhar 1 Madanlal 7 30 1 4 a<br />
134 U NER/R-197 Patta 1 Parshotam dass(closed structure) 2 1 4 a<br />
135 U NER/R-199 Jharalog 1 Rajja devi 1 35 1 4 a<br />
136 U NER/R-200 Jharalog 1 Barar ra(locked structure) owner not available 4 1 3 a<br />
137 U NER/R-203 Ladhror 1 Ganshyam Gupta 3 50 1 4 a<br />
138 U NER/R-210 Darman 1 Bimla Dev(closed structure) owner not available 80 1 4 a<br />
139 U NER/R-211 Ladhror 1 savita sharma 5 40 1 4 a<br />
140 U NER/R-212 Tamroh 1 Rakesh chand 9 1 4 a<br />
142 U NER/R-224 Bagwar 1 Saliq ram(close shop) 20 1 3 a<br />
144 U NER/R-229 Mundhahar 1 Amin chand 1 KhagnaRam Mundakhar 14 1 1 a<br />
145 U NER/R-230 Mundhahar 1 Geetadevi 2(wife) 20 1 1 a<br />
146 U NER/R-231 Mundhahar 1 Manohar lal 3(son) 10 1 4 a<br />
147 U NER/R-233 Sirwan 1 Runga ram(locked structure) 1 1 1 a<br />
148 U NER/R-234 Sirwan 1 Rati chand(locked structure) 1 4 1 1 a<br />
149 U NER/R-236 Kangahatti 1 Biasa devi 5 25 1 1 a<br />
150 U NER/R-237 Kangahatti 1 Late santram parkash(locked structure) 50 1 4 a<br />
151 U NER/R-238 Kangahatti 1 Kishorilal 6 1 1 a<br />
152 U NER/R-239 Kangahatti 1 Ratanchand(locked structure) 50 1 4 a<br />
153 U NER/R-240 Jahu talai 1 Kaushyala devi (Too old to respond) 50 1 4 a<br />
154 U NER/R-243 Kanchimore 1 Thakur sarwan(closed structure) 40 1 1 a<br />
Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
user <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property
S. No<br />
Pap Identiy<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project<br />
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - RHS<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy<br />
155 U NER/R-245 Sasir kanchmore 1 Ramesh kumar owner not available 15 1 1<br />
156 U NER/R-246 upper bhambla 1 Jawalaji(closed structure) 10 1 1 a<br />
157 U NER/R-247 Dhalwan 1 Seeta Ram 40 1 4 a<br />
158 U NER/R-249 Kalkhar 1 Lekhraj 3 Raj kumar .p.o Kalkhar 5 1 4 b<br />
159 U NER/R-250 Kalkhar 1 Raj kumari 1 5 1 4 a<br />
160 U NER/R-251 Kalkhar 1 Nandlal 1 Biham Ram Thakur 5 1 4 b<br />
161 U NER/R-252 Kalkhar 1 Roop singh(locked structure) owner not available 15 1 4 a<br />
162 U NER/R-253 Kalkhar 1 Shamlal 1 40 1 4 a<br />
163 U NER/R-254 Kalkhar 1 Sher singh 1 Prem singh 10 1 4 a<br />
164 U NER/R-255 Kalkhar 1 Kuldeep singh 3 Brij lal 6 1 4 b<br />
165 U NER/R-256 Kalkhar 1 Dharaml lal 3(son) Rudra singh 6 1 4 b<br />
166 U NER/R-257 Kalkhar 1 Pehembar lal 3 Balao devi 13 1 4 b<br />
167 U NER/R-258 Kalkhar 1 Puranchand(locked structure) 25 1 4 a<br />
168 U NER/R-259 Kalkhar 1 Chander singh 1 Chander singh 40 1 4 a<br />
169 U NER/R-263 Sadhera 1 Geetadevi 2 40 1 3 a<br />
170 U NER/R-264 Sadhera 1 Het ram (locked structure) owner not available 10 1 1 a<br />
171 U NER/R-266 Sadhera 1 Khem chand 4 1 1 a<br />
172 U NER/R-267 Bannon 1 Puranchand(locked structure) 40 1 1 a<br />
173 U NER/R-268 Bannon 1 Closed structure<br />
174 U NER/R-269 Sidhianni 1 Gomti Devi 2(wife) 6 1 4 a<br />
175 U NER/R-270 Sadiani 1 Laku ram(locked structure) 25 1 4 a<br />
176 U NER/R-271 Sadiani 1 kewal ram 1 40 1 4 a<br />
177 U NER/R-272 Sadiani 1 Bhupender pal 3 15 1 4 a<br />
178 U NER/R-273 Sadiani 1 Hukam chand(closed 25 1 4 a<br />
179 U NER/R-274 Sadiani 1 Deviram 3 manoj kumar 13 1 4 a<br />
180 U NER/R-279 Lakhwan 1 Bhawani sharma 2(wife) 30 1 4 a<br />
181 U NER/R-281 mathar(kanti) 1 Digu 50 1 4 a<br />
182 U NER/R-284 Barsar mehere 1 Vijay kumar 3 30 1 3 a<br />
183 U NER/R-285 Barsar mehere 1 Indane gas agency Kisho devi 22 1 b<br />
184 U NER/R-286 Barsar 1 10 1<br />
185 U NER/R-287 Samoh 1 Response denied 1<br />
205 U NER/R-307 Saloni 1 Rakesh Kumar 3 20 1 4 a<br />
206 U NER/R-308 Saloni 1 Sanjay Kumar 1 Durgi devi 22 1 4 b<br />
207 U NER/R-309 Bilkhar kahan 1 Sunil verma 3 17 1 4 a<br />
208 U NER/R-310 Kughan 1 Devki Dedvi 2 50 1 1 a<br />
209 U NER/R-311 Kughan 1 Tripta devi 2 5 1 1 a<br />
210 U NER/R-312 Bharai 1 Rattan Chand 1 50 1 4 a<br />
211 U NER/R-313 Balokhar 1 Prem chand (closed structure) 1<br />
212 U NER/R-314 Patta 1 Vidya Devi (Closed structure) 16 1 4 a<br />
213 U NER/R-315 Patta 1 Baldev Raj (Closed structure) 50 1 4 a<br />
214 U NER/R-316 Patta 1 Baldev Raj 1 35 1 4 a<br />
215 U NER/R-317 Patta 1 Raj Kumar 3 40 1 1 a<br />
216 U NER/R-318 Patta 1 Vyasa Devi (Closed structure) 50 1 4 a<br />
217 U NER/R-319 Ladror 1 Shankru Devi (Too old to respond) 1 70 1 4 a<br />
Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
user <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property
S. No<br />
Pap Identiy<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project<br />
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - RHS<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy<br />
218 U NER/R-320 Ladror 1 Brami devi 1 80 1 1 a<br />
219 U NER/R-321 Ladror 1 Larja Ram 1 26 1 1 a<br />
220 U NER/R-322 Ladror 1 Param Jeet 3 25 1 1 a<br />
221 U NER/R-323 Ladror 1 Chander Shekhar 7 60 1 4 a<br />
222 U NER/R-324 Kharota 1 Ranjeet singh 3 160 1 4 a<br />
223 U NER/R-326 Kangoo Ghati 1 Kashmir chand Kalia 1 15 1 1 a<br />
224 U NER/R-327 Kangoo Ghati 1 Jagdeesh Chand (Closed structure) 1 4 a<br />
225 U NER/R-328 Jahu 1 Yog Raj (Closed structure) 1 4 a<br />
226 U NER/R-329 Jahu 1 Rajesh Verma 3 6 1 4 a<br />
227 U NER/R-330 Jahu 1 Leela Devi 2 30 1 1 a<br />
228 U NER/R-331 Jahu 1 Aruna Mahajan 2 30 1 4 a<br />
229 U NER/R-332 Jahu 1 Sanjay Kumar 3 25 1 4 a<br />
230 U NER/R-333 Jahu 1 Ajay kumar 3 80 1 4 a<br />
Teog-Rohru<br />
Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
user <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property<br />
1 TR/R-001 Theog 1 Vimla Sharma (Owner Not available) 1 4 a<br />
2 TR/R-002 Bainla 1 Asha Devi 2 4 1 4 a<br />
3 TR/R-003 Shakti Nagar 1 Closed Structure<br />
4 TR/R-005 Chaila 1 Krishna Devi 1 Krishan Dutt Sharma 25 1 4 b<br />
5 TR/R-006 Chaila 1 Sushil Kumar 1 Krishan Dutt Sharma 15 1 4 b<br />
6 TR/R-007 Chaila 1 Sadh Ram 1 Krishan Dutt Sharma 32 1 4 b<br />
7 TR/R-008 Chaila 1 Rameshwar Prasad 1 Krishan Dutt Sharma 30 1 3 b<br />
8 TR/R-009 Chaila 1 Manoj Kumar 1 Ram Swaroop 10 1 4 b<br />
9 TR/R-010 Chaila 1 Ram Chand 1 60 1 4 a<br />
10 TR/R-011 Chaila 1 Arvind Sood 1 40 1 4 a<br />
11 TR/R-012 Chaila 1 Sanjay Kumar(Owner Not available) 2 Sudesh Kumari 50 1 4 b<br />
12 TR/R-013 Chaila 1 Ramesh Chand (Owner Not available) 1 Chaila Temple Committee 60 1 4 b<br />
13 TR/R-014 Chaila 1 Prince 1 Chaila Temple Committee 7 1 4 b<br />
14 TR/R-015 Chaila 1 Rattan Lal 1 Ravi Dutt 12 1 4 b<br />
15 TR/R-017 Chaila 1 Suresh Chandel 1 Ram Swaroop 4 1 4 b<br />
16 TR/R-018 Chaila 1 Ram Swaroop (Owner not available) 1 50 1 4 a<br />
17 TR/R-019 Chaila 1 Devi Dutt Sharma (Owner not available) 1 60 1 4 a<br />
18 TR/R-020 Bhager 1 Rajinder Chauhan (Owner not available) 1 1 4 a<br />
19 TR/R-021 Bhager 1 Indra Chauhan 1 Rajender Chauhan 3 1 4 b<br />
20 TR/R-022 Bhager 1 Mohi Ram 1 20 1 1 a<br />
21 TR/R-024 Bhuai 1 Jai Ram(Owner not available)<br />
22 TR/R-028 Hulli 1 Shaukat Ali 1 14 2 a<br />
23 TR/R-029 Hulli 1 Ram Dyal 3 5 1 4 a<br />
24 TR/R-031 Gumma 1 Roshan Lal 1 Panchayat Land 20 1 1 b<br />
25 TR/R-032 Gumma 1 R.K. Vishwas (Owner not available) Panchayat Land 1 4 b<br />
26 TR/R-034 Gumma 1 Mohan lal Chauhan(Owner not available) 1 1 4 a<br />
27 TR/R-038 Kotkhai 1 Hari Gopal 1 30 1 4 a<br />
28 TR/R-041 Kotkhai 1 Laku Ram sharma 1 Daulat Ram Verma 45 1 4 b
S. No<br />
Pap Identiy<br />
No<br />
Pernament Address<br />
Likely to be<br />
affected by<br />
project<br />
Annexure III - Socio - Economic Baseline Survey <strong>of</strong> PAP's - RHS<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the respondent<br />
Relationship to<br />
HH<br />
Owner Details<br />
Years <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy<br />
29 TR/R-042 Kotkhai 1 Amar Jeet singh 3 Panchayat Land 15 1 1 b<br />
30 TR/R-043 Kotkhai 1 Devraj sharma 1 Panchayat Land 30 1 4 b<br />
31 TR/R-044 Kotkhai 1 Vishal Nanda 1 Panchayat Land 9 1 4 b<br />
32 TR/R-045 Kotkhai 1 Labh singh 1 Panchayat Land 3 1 4 b<br />
33 TR/R-047 Kotkhai 1 Jag Prasad 1 Panchayat Land 30 1 4 b<br />
34 TR/R-048 Kotkhai 1 Vikas 3 Panchayat Land 15 1 4 b<br />
35 TR/R-049 Kotkhai 1 Murti Guest House(Owner not available)<br />
36 TR/R-051 Dumehar 1 Gulab Singh (Owner not available) 50 1 4 a<br />
37 TR/R-052 Jaltar 1 Mangat Ram 1 44 1 4 a<br />
38 TR/R-056 Saliana 1 Closed structure (Owner not available)<br />
39 TR/R-058 Parshal 1 Ravinder & Sawant 3 7 1 4 a<br />
40 TR/R-059 Parshal 1 Sai Ram(Owner not available) 5 1 1 a<br />
41 TR/R-060 Parshal 1 Kali Ram(Owner not available) 40 1 4 a<br />
42 TR/R-061 Parshal 1 Malti Devi 2 Kali Ram 20 1 4 b<br />
43 TR/R-067 Kharapathar 1 Subhash Chand 1 Mohan singh 15 1 4 b<br />
44 TR/R-068 Kharapathar 1 Dilip singh(Closed structure) 1 Mohan singh 15 1 b<br />
45 TR/R-070 Snabha 1 Meera Devi 1 15 1 4 a<br />
46 TR/R-071 Snabha 1 Closed structure (Owner not available)<br />
47 TR/R-074 Shari 1 Anjna Devi 3 30 1 1 a<br />
48 TR/R-078 Shari 1 Closed structure (Owner not available)<br />
49 TR/R-079 Shari 1 Shamsher singh Khagta 1 20 1 4 a<br />
50 TR/R-080 Dochi 1 Roshan Lal Thanta 1 20 1 4 a<br />
51 TR/R-082 Dochi 1 Preetam singh (Closed structure) 15 1<br />
52 TR/R-083 Dochi 1 Bhawani Dutt 1 Sher singh sharma 4 1 4 b<br />
53 TR/R-084 Dochi 1 Rajesh Kumar(Closed structure) 1 Sher singh sharma 2 1 4 b<br />
54 TR/R-087 Virat Nagar 1 Babli 5 50 1 4 a<br />
55 TR/R-088 Virat Nagar 1 Bukshi 1 40 1 1 a<br />
56 TR/R-089 Virat Nagar 1 Rattan Chand (Closed structure) 1 60 1 4 a<br />
57 TR/R-090 Virat Nagar 1 Sanjay Khamta 1 15 1 4 a<br />
58 TR/R-091 Rohru 1 kishan chand (Closed structure) 30 1 4 a<br />
59 TR/R-092 Rohru 1 M.R. Busheri 1 21 1 1 a<br />
60 TR/R-093 Rohru 1 Vinod Sood (Response denied) 1 1 4 a<br />
61 TR/R-094 Rohru 1 Shamsher singh (Owner not available) 4 1 4 a<br />
Religion<br />
Social<br />
Status<br />
Status <strong>of</strong><br />
user <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property
SNo<br />
Pap Identiy<br />
No<br />
Affected Property information<br />
Total Area<br />
in (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
Total Area<br />
Affected (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
Mehatpur-Una-Amb<br />
1 MU-R/014 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 14.4 4.5<br />
2 MU-R/015 Pucca 1 2 1 2 650 1 15 7.2<br />
3 MU-R/016 Pucca 1 2 2 2 1000 1 45.36 17.28<br />
4 MU-R/017 Pucca 1 2 2 1 40.95 13.65<br />
5 MU-R/018 Pucca 1 2 2 2 1000 1 41.04 12.96<br />
6 MU-R/020 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 19.84 5.44<br />
7 MU-R/030 kacha 1 2 1 1 3.42 3.42<br />
8 MU-R/032 kacha 2 1 3 1 1 43.43 20.64<br />
9 MU-R/034 Pucca 1 1 2 1 1,2 191.25 58.75<br />
10 MU-R/037 kacha 1 2 1 2 200 3.74 3.74<br />
11 MU-R/038 kacha 1 2 1 2 3.74 3.74<br />
12 MU-R/039 kacha 1 2 1 2 50 1 6.25 6.25<br />
13 MU-R/040 kacha 1 2 1 2 200 15.6 7.8<br />
14 MU-R/043 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1,3 22.05 15.4<br />
15 MU-R/044 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 22.05 7.7<br />
16 MU-R/045 Pucca 1 2 8 1 1 166.95 58.3<br />
17 MU-R/046 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 35.91 26.79<br />
18 MU-R/047 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 18.9 14.1<br />
19 MU-R/048 Pucca 2 2 3 1 1,2 50.4 50.4<br />
20 MU-R/049 Pucca 1 2 1 2 800 1 22.05 15.4<br />
21 MU-R/051 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 11.84 11.1<br />
22 MU-R/056 kacha 1 8(Khokha) 6.25 1.25<br />
23 MU-R/057 kacha 1 2 1 2 300 6.25 1.25<br />
24 MU-R/058 kacha 1 2 1 2 500 1 6.25 1.25<br />
25 MU-R/059 kacha 1 2 1 2 500 1 6.25 1.25<br />
26 MU-R/060 kacha 1 2 1 1 1 6.25 1.25<br />
27 MU-R/061 kacha 1 1 2 1 1 6.25 1.25<br />
28 MU-R/062 kacha 1 2 1 1 6.25 1.25<br />
29 MU-R/063 kacha 1 2 1 1 1 6.25 1.25<br />
30 Ua-R/001 Pucca 1 2 1 1 6.25 1.25<br />
31 Ua-R/002 Semi-Pucca 1 4 1 1 1 6.6 6.6<br />
32 Ua-R/003 Pucca 1 1 1 1 1 20.58 7.14<br />
33 Ua-R/006 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 11.9 9.8<br />
34 Ua-R/007 Pucca 2 2 4 1 1,3 103.68 40.5<br />
35 Ua-R/008 Pucca 1 2 1 2 2500 1 20.48 11.2<br />
36 Ua-R/009 Pucca 2 2 2 1 1 22.4 11.2<br />
37 Ua-R/010 Pucca 1 1 1 28.05 28.05<br />
38 Ua-R/011 Pucca 1 3 5 1 1,2,3 388.36 156.22<br />
39 Ua-R/012 Pucca 1 2 1 2 2000 1 16 16<br />
40 Ua-R/013 Pucca 1 2 2 2 1 36 36<br />
41 Ua-R/014 Pucca 1 1 3 1 1,2 87.33 87.33<br />
42 Ua-R/016 Pucca 1 1 3 1 1 65.96 65.96<br />
43 Ua-R/017 Pucca 2 1 2 1 1 77 77<br />
44 Ua-R/018 Pucca 1 1 7 1 1,2,3 188 188<br />
45 Ua-R/019 Pucca 1 2 1 2 900 1,3 15 15<br />
46 Ua-R/020 Pucca 2 2 1 1 1 15 15<br />
47 Ua-R/021 Pucca 2 1 5 1 1,2,3 81.9 2.1<br />
48 Ua-R/024 Pucca 1 5 1 7 7<br />
49 Ua-R/025 Pucca 1 5 1 7 7<br />
50 Ua-R/026 Pucca 1 2 1 2 200 9 3<br />
51 Ua-R/027 Pucca 1 2 1 2 160 1 9 3<br />
52 Ua-R/028 Pucca 1 2 1 2 300 1 9 3<br />
53 Ua-R/029 Pucca 1 2 1 2 225 1 9 3<br />
54 Ua-R/030 Pucca 1 2 1 2 80 9 3<br />
55 Ua-R/031 Pucca 1 2 1 2 70 9 3<br />
56 Ua-R/032 Pucca 1 2 1 2 100 1 9 3<br />
57 Ua-R/033 Pucca 1 2 1 2 250 1,3 9 3<br />
58 Ua-R/034 Pucca 1 2 1 2 400 1,3 9 3<br />
59 Ua-R/035 Pucca 1 2 1 2 400 1 9 3<br />
60 Ua-R/036 Pucca 1 2 1 2 130 1 9 3<br />
61 Ua-R/037 Pucca 1 2 1 2 400 1 9 3<br />
62 Ua-R/038 Pucca 2 2 1 2 575 1 9 3<br />
63 Ua-R/039 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 9 4.5<br />
64 Ua-R/040 Pucca 1 2 1 2 640 1,3 9 4.5<br />
65 Ua-R/041 Pucca 1 2 1 2 650 1 9 4.5
SNo Pap Identiy<br />
Affected Property information<br />
No<br />
Total Area Total Area<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
in (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
Affected (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
66 Ua-R/042 Pucca 2 2 1 1 1,3 18 4.5<br />
67 Ua-R/043 Pucca 2 3 1 1 1,3 18 3<br />
68 UA-R/003 Semi-Pucca 1 1 3 1 1.2 57.23 14.5<br />
69 UA-R/004 Semi-Pucca 1 1 3 1 1 108.64 8.1<br />
70 UA-R/010 Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1,3(P.C0) 14 3.5<br />
71 UA-R/011 Pucca 1 2 1 2 350 1 11.6 11.6<br />
72 UA-R/012 Pucca 2 2 1 1 1 20.8 20.8<br />
73 UA-R/013 Pucca 2 2 1 2 215 1 10.4 10.4<br />
74 UA-R/014 Pucca 1 1 1 1 1,283 357.6 357.6<br />
75 UA-R/015 Semi-Pucca 1 1 1 1 1 35.1 35.1<br />
76 UA-R/016 Pucca 1 1 3 1 1,2 68.6 37.1<br />
77 UA-R/017 Semi-Pucca 1 4 2 1 1,2 73.44 73.44<br />
78 UA-R/018 Pucca 1 1 2 1 1,2 33.21 33.21<br />
79 UA-R/020 Pucca 1 7.8 Well Well<br />
80 UA-R/023 Pucca 1 5 1 107.8 3.85<br />
81 UA-R/028 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 250 1 11.4 3.3<br />
82 UA-R/029 Pucca 1 1 1 2 200 1 11.78 4.65<br />
83 UA-R/033 Pucca 1 2 1 2 350 1 38.61 37.62<br />
84 UA-R/034 kacha 1 8(Kitchen) 1 1 1 18 18<br />
85 UA-R/035 kacha 1 8(Kitchen) 1 1 1 11.16 11.16<br />
86 UA-R/036 Pucca 2 1 5 1 1 93.12 15.52<br />
87 UA-R/037 Pucca 2 1 7 1 1,2,3 188 48.88<br />
88 UA-R/046 kacha 1 2 1 2 100 4.2 4.2<br />
89 UA-R/047 Pucca 1 2 3 1 1 122.18 13.41<br />
90 UA-R/050 Pucca 1 1 1 1 1,2,3 224 21<br />
91 UA-R/051 Semi-Pucca 1 8(Store) 1 1 42.78 24.8<br />
92 UA-R/053 kacha 1 4 1 1 1 49.2 49.2<br />
93 UA-R/056 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 10.5 4.9<br />
94 UA-R/057 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 1 27.6 27.6<br />
95 UA-R/064 Pucca 1 3 3 1 29 5<br />
96 UA-R/065 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 17.6 5.44<br />
97 UA-R/066 Pucca 1 2 1 2 400 17.05 5.27<br />
98 UA-R/067 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 16.17 16.17<br />
99 UA-R/068 Pucca 1 3 2 1 1,2 33.6 33.6<br />
100 UA-R/069 kacha 1 2 1 1 4.62 4.62<br />
101 UA-R/070 Semi-Pucca 1 2 2 1 1,2,3 53.4 53.4<br />
102 UA-R/072 kacha 1 8(Khokha) 1 1 3.61 3.61<br />
103 UA-R/076 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 36.98 27.52<br />
104 UA-R/077 Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 107.8 52.8<br />
105 UA-R/078 Pucca 1 3 2 1 1 53.36 10.12<br />
106 UA-R/079 Pucca 1 2 5 1 99.2 99.2<br />
107 UA-R/085 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 12.3 2.05<br />
108 UA-R/086 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 16.2 11.16<br />
109 UA-R/087 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 6.8 6.8<br />
110 UA-R/088 Semi-Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 27.69 11.7<br />
111 UA-R/090 Semi-Pucca 1 1 2 1 1,2 35.4 5.75<br />
112 UA-R/091 kacha 1 8(Store) 9 1.8<br />
113 UA-R/097 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 30.66 3.65<br />
114 UA-R/115 kacha 1 2 1 4 4<br />
115 UA-R/120 kacha 1 2 2 1500 9.6 9.6<br />
Una-Kalkhar<br />
1 U NER/R-00 Kacha 1 2 1 2 1400 7.2 7.2<br />
2 U NER/R-003Kacha 1 2 1 1 1 3.3 3.3<br />
3 U NER/R-007Pucca 2 3 4 1 1 213 28.4<br />
4 U NER/R-008Pucca 2 3 1 2 550 1 9.25 1.25<br />
5 U NER/R-009Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 9.25 1.25<br />
6 U NER/R-010Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 9.25 1.25<br />
7 U NER/R-01 Pucca 1 3 11 1 1,2,3 68.6 19.6<br />
8 U NER/R-012Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 57.15 16.2<br />
9 U NER/R-013Kacha 1 2 1 1 1 36 12.96<br />
10 U NER/R-014Kacha 1 2 1 1 1 36 12.96<br />
11 U NER/R-016Pucca 1 8 3 1 63.51 23.36<br />
12 U NER/R-017Pucca 2 1 5 1 1,2,3 157.3 38.61<br />
13 U NER/R-018Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 56.7 3.15<br />
14 U NER/R-019Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 18.29 1.86
SNo Pap Identiy<br />
Affected Property information<br />
No<br />
Total Area Total Area<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
in (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
Affected (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
15 U NER/R-020Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 18.29 1.86<br />
16 U NER/R-026Pucca 1 8 1 1 1,3 44.1 3.43<br />
18 U NER/R-029Semi-Pucca 1 4 1 1 14.62 14.62<br />
22 U NER/R-04 Semi-Pucca 1 3 2 1 1,2,3 16.66 9.8<br />
23 U NER/R-042Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 19.74 8.4<br />
25 U NER/R-045Pucca 1 1 3 1 1,2,3 57.78 12.84<br />
26 U NER/R-046Semi-Pucca 1 5 1 1 29.14 4.7<br />
27 U NER/R-047Pucca 1 7 2 1 60.8 1.28<br />
28 U NER/R-05 Semi-Pucca 1 4 2 1 1 44.65 19<br />
29 U NER/R-053Semi-Pucca 1 1 3 1 1 82.28 16.94<br />
30 U NER/R-054Semi-Pucca 1 1 1 1 36.96 36.96<br />
31 U NER/R-056Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 39.13 39.13<br />
32 U NER/R-057Semi-Pucca 1 1 4 1,2 105.6 105.6<br />
33 U NER/R-058Semi-Pucca 1 1 6 1 1,2,3 195.3 195.3<br />
34 U NER/R-059Kacha 1 4 1 1 1 26.23 26.23<br />
35 U NER/R-060Pucca 1 1 4 1 1,2 120.4 120.4<br />
36 U NER/R-063Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 15.5 3.1<br />
37 U NER/R-064Pucca 1 2 1 450 1 15.5 3.1<br />
38 U NER/R-065Pucca 1 2 1 2 450 1 16 3.2<br />
39 U NER/R-066Pucca 2 2 2 1 1,2,3 58.1 4.9<br />
40 U NER/R-067Pucca 1 2 1 2 600 1 13.44 0.63<br />
41 U NER/R-068Pucca 1 2 1 2 1 25.2 25.2<br />
42 U NER/R-069Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 25.2 25.2<br />
43 U NER/R-070Pucca 1 2 1 2 600 1 21.5 21.5<br />
44 U NER/R-07 Pucca 1 2 1 2 600 1 28 16.25<br />
45 U NER/R-072Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 31.36 18.2<br />
46 U NER/R-073Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 13 13<br />
47 U NER/R-074Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 13 13<br />
48 U NER/R-075Kacha 1 1 1 2 500 1 12 12<br />
49 U NER/R-076Kacha 1 2 1 2 800 1 9.89 9.89<br />
50 U NER/R-077Kacha 1 1 1 1 1 25.08 1.65<br />
51 U NER/R-078Pucca 1 1 1 1 25.6 2<br />
52 U NER/R-082Pucca 1 2 6 1 1,2,3 427.8 155<br />
53 U NER/R-083Pucca 2 2 4 1 1 128 16<br />
54 U NER/R-092Pucca 1 1 5 1 1,2,3 138 19.32<br />
55 U NER/R-095Semi-Pucca 2 2 3 1 1 60.3 27.9<br />
56 U NER/R-096Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 6.72 6.72<br />
57 U NER/R-097Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 46.48 6.72<br />
58 U NER/R-098Pucca 1 1 3 1 86 8.6<br />
59 U NER/R-098Pucca 2 2 2 2 300 1 109.14 3.21<br />
60 U NER/R-099Semi-Pucca 1 1 4 1 1 122.4 19.8<br />
61 U NER/R-100Semi-Pucca 1 4 1 1 26.55 1.18<br />
62 U NER/R-10 Pucca 1 2 1 1 25.2 3.6<br />
63 U NER/R-102Pucca 1 2 3 1 1 45.9 4.25<br />
64 U NER/R-104Semi-Pucca 2 1 4 1 1 83.84 6.55<br />
65 U NER/R-105Pucca 1 2 2 2 1000 1 51 5.1<br />
66 U NER/R-106Pucca 1 2 5 1 1,2,3 52.7 7.75<br />
67 U NER/R-107Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 51 5.1<br />
68 U NER/R-108Pucca 1 2 1 2 600 1 54 4.68<br />
69 U NER/R-109Pucca 1 3 1 1 1 52.5 4.2<br />
70 U NER/R-110Semi-Pucca 3 1 3 1 1 144.96 98.15<br />
71 U NER/R-11 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1,2,3 94.92 14.28<br />
72 U NER/R-112Pucca 1 2 1 2 700 1 21.28 1.9<br />
73 U NER/R-113Pucca 1 2 1 1 13 0.78<br />
74 U NER/R-114Pucca 1 2 1 2 1600 1,3 13 0.78<br />
75 U NER/R-115Semi-Pucca 1 8 1 1 17.39 4.23<br />
76 U NER/R-116Pucca 1 3 1 1 1 30.1 13.33<br />
77 U NER/R-117Pucca 2 2 1 1 27.2 8.96<br />
78 U NER/R-118Pucca 2 2 1 1 1 76 33.25<br />
79 U NER/R-119Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 24.65 10.15<br />
80 U NER/R-120Pucca 2 2 3 1 1,2 25.6 3.84<br />
81 U NER/R-12 Pucca 2 3 3 2 500 1 28.8 4.32<br />
82 U NER/R-123Pucca 2 2 4 1 1.2 88.04 8.68<br />
83 U NER/R-124Pucca 1 2 1 2 700 1 21.3 2.1<br />
84 U NER/R-125Pucca 2 2 2 1 1 18.17 3.45<br />
85 U NER/R-126Pucca 2 2 1 1 1 23.4 4.5
SNo Pap Identiy<br />
Affected Property information<br />
No<br />
Total Area Total Area<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
in (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
Affected (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
86 U NER/R-127Pucca 2 2 2 2 1500 1 30.02 3.42<br />
87 U NER/R-128Pucca 2 2 2 1 1 31.6 4<br />
88 U NER/R-129Pucca 3 3 1 1 1 13.34 7.82<br />
89 U NER/R-130Pucca 2 2 1 1 1 13.34 13.34<br />
90 U NER/R-13 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1 13 7.8<br />
91 U NER/R-132Pucca 1 2 1 2 1 12 4.8<br />
92 U NER/R-133Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 32.4 4.32<br />
93 U NER/R-135Semi-Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 39.78 6.24<br />
94 U NER/R-137Semi-Pucca 1 4 2 1 48.6 22.68<br />
95 U NER/R-139Semi-Pucca 1 1 2 1 40.5 16.2<br />
96 U NER/R-140Semi-Pucca 1 4 1 1 28.05 4.08<br />
97 U NER/R-142Pucca 1 5 1 5.75 5.75<br />
99 U NER/R-147Pucca 2 3 1 2 600 1,3 26.65 2.05<br />
100 U NER/R-148Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 24.7 2.66<br />
101 U NER/R-149Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 28.56 4.08<br />
102 U NER/R-150Pucca 1 1 3 1 1 39.9 10.64<br />
103 U NER/R-15 Semi-Pucca 2 3 2 2 1 58 11.6<br />
104 U NER/R-152Semi-Pucca 2 1 2 1 1 45 14.4<br />
105 U NER/R-153Kacha 2 5 1 1 1 59.4 10.8<br />
106 U NER/R-154Kacha 2 1 2 1 1,2,3 59.4 10.8<br />
107 U NER/R-155Semi-Pucca 1 1 4 1 1 60 12<br />
108 U NER/R-156Pucca 3 3 3 1 1,2,3 50 20<br />
109 U NER/R-157Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 30.66 2.1<br />
110 U NER/R-158Pucca 1 1 1 1 1 61.32 4.2<br />
111 U NER/R-159Pucca 2 1 1 1,2 132.8 22.4<br />
112 U NER/R-160Pucca 1 1 2 1 4.7 96 60<br />
113 U NER/R-16 Semi-Pucca 2 1 2 1 1 60 12<br />
114 U NER/R-162Pucca 1 1 1 1 1 34.4 5.16<br />
115 U NER/R-163Pucca 1 1 3 1 1 99.36 36.8<br />
117 U NER/R-166Pucca 2 2 1 1 1 16.5 6.6<br />
119 U NER/R-172Semi-Pucca 2 3 3 2 1500 1,3 39 12.5<br />
120 U NER/R-173Pucca 2 3 1 1 39 16<br />
121 U NER/R-174Pucca 2 2 2 2 400 1 92.4 39.6<br />
122 U NER/R-175Semi-Pucca 1 2 6 2 150 57.75 16.5<br />
123 U NER/R-176Semi-Pucca 1 2 4 46.8 23.4<br />
124 U NER/R-177Pucca 2 3 8 1 1,2 112 112<br />
125 U NER/R-178Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 72 27<br />
126 U NER/R-179Semi-Pucca 2 4 2 1 1 39.5 7.9<br />
127 U NER/R-180Pucca 1 2 1 1 21 2.1<br />
128 U NER/R-183Semi-Pucca 2 4 1 1 23 7.82<br />
129 U NER/R-184Kacha 1 4 1 1 1 27.2 12.8<br />
130 U NER/R-187Pucca 2 3 1 1 27 27<br />
131 U NER/R-188Semi-Pucca 1 1 4 1 1, 109.5 7.3<br />
132 U NER/R-190Pucca 1 2 3 1 1 47.7 13.78<br />
133 U NER/R-19 Semi-Pucca 2 1 1 1 1 177.6 21.6<br />
134 U NER/R-197Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 1 80.04 4.64<br />
135 U NER/R-199Semi-Pucca 2 1 2 1 1 37.5 37.5<br />
136 U NER/R-200Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 16.8 16.38<br />
137 U NER/R-203Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 81.9 23.4<br />
139 U NER/R-210Kacha 1 1 4 1 1 69.58 18.62<br />
140 U NER/R-21 Kacha 1 1 3 1 99.75 99.75<br />
141 U NER/R-212Pucca 1 2 1 3 1 70.62 19.8<br />
143 U NER/R-224Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 23.1 15.4<br />
145 U NER/R-229Pucca 1 2 2 500 1 6.7 17.5 9.1<br />
146 U NER/R-230Pucca 2 4 3 1 2 62.54 62.54<br />
147 U NER/R-23 Pucca 1 2 2 1 182.4 3.36<br />
148 U NER/R-233Pucca 1 1 3 1 1 144 43.2<br />
149 U NER/R-234Pucca 1 1 5 1 1 80.85 14.7<br />
151 U NER/R-236Pucca 3 1 2 1 1 68 13.6<br />
152 U NER/R-237Semi-Pucca 1 4 1 1 20.64 11.61<br />
153 U NER/R-238Pucca 1 4 2 1 1 44.8 7<br />
154 U NER/R-239Kacha 1 4 1 1 45 4.5<br />
155 U NER/R-240Kacha 2 4 2 1 40.32 16.8<br />
156 U NER/R-243Semi-Pucca 2 3 1 1 1 88 54.4<br />
157 U NER/R-245Kacha 1 4 1 1 18.9 8.4<br />
158 U NER/R-246Pucca 2 1 4 1 1 88 54.4
SNo Pap Identiy<br />
Affected Property information<br />
No<br />
Total Area Total Area<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
in (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
Affected (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
159 U NER/R-247Pucca 2 1 1 136.5 26<br />
160 U NER/R-249Pucca 1 2 1 2 650 31.92 15.2<br />
161 U NER/R-250Pucca 3 3 1 1 1 33.6 16<br />
162 U NER/R-25 Pucca 1 2 4 2 600 24.12 14.4<br />
163 U NER/R-252Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 26.8 16<br />
164 U NER/R-253Pucca 1 3 1 1 51.33 23.6<br />
165 U NER/R-254Pucca 1 2 1 2 300 1 19.2 7.2<br />
166 U NER/R-255Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 23 6.9<br />
167 U NER/R-256Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 23 4.6<br />
168 U NER/R-257Pucca 1 2 1 2 500 1 22.4 9.8<br />
169 U NER/R-258Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 24 10.5<br />
170 U NER/R-259Pucca 2 3 4 1 1 120 45<br />
172 U NER/R-263Pucca 2 1 3 1 32 4<br />
173 U NER/R-264Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 42 42<br />
174 U NER/R-266Kacha 1 2 1 1 5 4.2 4.2<br />
175 U NER/R-267Semi-Pucca 1 4 2 37.35 10.79<br />
176 U NER/R-268Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 25 25<br />
177 U NER/R-269Semi-Pucca 1 1 1 1 1 54.6 5.46<br />
178 U NER/R-270Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 32.5 16.25<br />
179 U NER/R-27 Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 13 13<br />
180 U NER/R-272Pucca 2 3 1 1 2 28 14<br />
181 U NER/R-273Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 47 16<br />
182 U NER/R-274Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 100 18.72 4.16<br />
184 U NER/R-279Pucca 2 3 3 1 1,2,3 93.6 13<br />
185 U NER/R-28 Kacha 1 1 2 1 1 36 36<br />
186 U NER/R-284Pucca 1 2 1 1 1,2,3 32.24 1.55<br />
187 U NER/R-285Pucca 2 2 3 2 1,3 147.68 7.1<br />
188 U NER/R-286Pucca 2 2 4 2 1 560 10.36<br />
189 U NER/R-287Pucca 2 1 3 1 1 43.2 4.8<br />
209 U NER/R-307Kacha 1 2 1 1 1 7.36 4.14<br />
210 U NER/R-308Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 200 1 10.5 5.4<br />
211 U NER/R-309Pucca 1 2 3 1 1 79.57 16.35<br />
212 U NER/R-310Semi-Pucca 2 1 2 1 1,2 71.02 26.8<br />
213 U NER/R-31 Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 92.16 25.6<br />
214 U NER/R-312Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 22.05 5.04<br />
215 U NER/R-313Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 17.15 1.96<br />
216 U NER/R-314Pucca 2 1 3 1 1 121.44 6.1<br />
217 U NER/R-315Semi-Pucca 1 8 1 1 1 206.5 17.5<br />
218 U NER/R-316Pucca 1 2 2 1 1 104.55 5.1<br />
219 U NER/R-317Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 34.45 13<br />
220 U NER/R-318Pucca 1 1 4 1 1 54.94 18.86<br />
221 U NER/R-319Kacha 1 1 1 1 1 15.98 15.98<br />
222 U NER/R-320Semi-Pucca 1 1 1 1 1 30.82 11.04<br />
223 U NER/R-32 Pucca 1 3 7 1 1,2,3 108.8 22.4<br />
224 U NER/R-322Pucca 2 3 2 1 1 24.84 8.64<br />
225 U NER/R-323Pucca 1 3 3 1 1,2,3 73.47 13.95<br />
226 U NER/R-324Pucca 1 1 2 1 1 120 45<br />
228 U NER/R-326Pucca 3 3 2 1 1 49.4 5.32<br />
229 U NER/R-327Pucca 1 5 1 17.1 17.1<br />
230 U NER/R-328Pucca 1 1 1 1 79.73 9.38<br />
231 U NER/R-329Pucca 2 3 2 1 1 60.45 14.3<br />
232 U NER/R-330Pucca 2 8 2 1 1 32 6.4<br />
233 U NER/R-33 Pucca 2 3 4 1 1 72.9 9.45<br />
234 U NER/R-332Pucca 2 3 3 1 1 47.6 14<br />
235 U NER/R-333Pucca 2 3 1 1 1,2,3 35 3.5<br />
Theog-Rohru<br />
1 TR/R-001 Pucca 6 3 2 1 1 99.16 37.31<br />
2 TR/R-002 Pucca 1 1 4 1 1 68.85 100.00<br />
3 TR/R-003 Pucca 2 2 2 1 33.12 21.74<br />
4 TR/R-005 Kacha 1 2 1 2 100 2.85 100.00<br />
5 TR/R-006 Kacha 1 2 1 2 300 1 6.25 100.00<br />
6 TR/R-007 Kacha 1 2 1 2 200 5.13 100.00<br />
7 TR/R-008 Kacha 1 2 1 2 300 1 8.74 100.00<br />
8 TR/R-009 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 800 1,3 18.5 100.00
SNo Pap Identiy<br />
Affected Property information<br />
No<br />
Total Area Total Area<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Construction<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Floors<br />
Type <strong>of</strong><br />
use<br />
No <strong>of</strong><br />
Rooms<br />
Tenure<br />
Status<br />
Monthly<br />
Rent<br />
Utility<br />
Connections<br />
in (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
Affected (SQ.<br />
MT.)<br />
9 TR/R-010 Kacha 1 2 1 1 1 4.6 100.00<br />
10 TR/R-011 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 18.9 100.00<br />
11 TR/R-012 Pucca 1 2 1 2 1500 1 8.75 100.00<br />
12 TR/R-013 Pucca 1 2 2 2 1 21.7 100.00<br />
13 TR/R-014 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 600 1 10.85 100.00<br />
14 TR/R-015 Pucca 1 2 1 2 800 1 14.85 100.00<br />
15 TR/R-017 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 800 16.64 100.00<br />
16 TR/R-018 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 26 100.00<br />
17 TR/R-019 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 18.2 100.00<br />
18 TR/R-020 Pucca 2 3 2 1 1 84.24 27.78<br />
19 TR/R-021 Pucca 1 3 1 2 1500 1 27.2 37.50<br />
20 TR/R-022 Semi-Pucca 1 1 4 1 1 108 18.33<br />
21 TR/R-024 Kacha 1 3 2 1 1 18 100.00<br />
22 TR/R-028 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 16 25.00<br />
23 TR/R-029 Pucca 2 1 4 1 1 90 100.00<br />
24 TR/R-031 Kacha 1 2 1 2 100 1 7.5 100.00<br />
25 TR/R-032 Kacha 1 2 1 2 100 1 9 100.00<br />
26 TR/R-034 Pucca 2 3 6 1 1 210.42 100.00<br />
27 TR/R-038 Pucca 1 2 1 1 1 13.6 100.00<br />
28 TR/R-041 Semi-Pucca 2 3 3 2 250 1 67.5 56.00<br />
29 TR/R-042 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 1 100 1 8 100.00<br />
30 TR/R-043 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 350 1 28.86 100.00<br />
31 TR/R-044 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 220 1 19.2 100.00<br />
32 TR/R-045 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 300 1 8.05 100.00<br />
33 TR/R-047 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 250 1 10.15 100.00<br />
34 TR/R-048 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 1 9.9 100.00<br />
35 TR/R-049 Pucca 3 2 3 1 1 108 25.00<br />
36 TR/R-051 Kacha 2 1 3 1 1 48.15 100.00<br />
37 TR/R-052 Semi-Pucca 2 4 1 1 19.8 100.00<br />
38 TR/R-056 Kacha 1 8(Garaj) 1 1 22 100.00<br />
39 TR/R-058 Kacha 1 8 1 1 11 100.00<br />
40 TR/R-059 Kacha 1 8(Store) 1 1 14 100.00<br />
41 TR/R-060 Semi-Pucca 1 1 2 1 65.52 100.00<br />
42 TR/R-061 Semi-Pucca 1 3 2 2 600 52.26 100.00<br />
43 TR/R-067 Semi-Pucca 1 2 1 2 1000 5.95 100.00<br />
44 TR/R-068 Kacha 1 2 1 2 1000 5.95 100.00<br />
45 TR/R-070 Kacha 1 3 3 1 1 48 55.00<br />
46 TR/R-071 Kacha 1 8 1 1 12.21 100.00<br />
47 TR/R-074 Semi-Pucca 1 1 1 1 1 28.98 73.81<br />
48 TR/R-078 Kacha 1 8(Store) 1 1 15.95 55.17<br />
49 TR/R-079 Pucca 2 1 4 1 120.9 25.64<br />
50 TR/R-080 Semi-Pucca 2 4 1 1 1 40.67 100.00<br />
51 TR/R-082 Kacha 1 2 1 2 14.84 75.47<br />
52 TR/R-083 Pucca 1 2 2 2 1000 1 33.5 31.34<br />
53 TR/R-084 Pucca 1 2 1 2 800 1 29.48 31.34<br />
54 TR/R-087 Semi-Pucca 3 1 1 1 1 60.68 37.80<br />
55 TR/R-088 Kacha 1 3 1 1 1 12.24 100.00<br />
56 TR/R-089 Kacha 1 1 1 1 22.26 100.00<br />
57 TR/R-090 Pucca 3 1 2 1 1,2,3 74.8 85.29<br />
58 TR/R-091 Pucca 1 4 2 1 1 62.64 55.56<br />
59 TR/R-092 Pucca 1 2 3 1 120 100.00<br />
60 TR/R-093 Pucca 3 2 12 1 1 333 20.00<br />
61 TR/R-094 Pucca 3 1 4 1 78.4 7.86
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
SNo PAP Identiy No<br />
Tele Tape<br />
Refri Tele<br />
Three Two Four Bus Cooking Others<br />
vision Recorder Radio greator Phone Cycles Wheelers Wheelers Wheelers Truck gas (Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
Mehatpur-Una-Amb<br />
1 MU-R/015 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
2 MU-R/016 1 1 1 2 1 1<br />
3 MU-R/018 1 1 1<br />
4 MU-R/020 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
5 MU-R/032 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
6 MU-R/034 1 1 1 1 2 1<br />
7 MU-R/037 1 1<br />
8 MU-R/039 1 1<br />
9 MU-R/040 1 1<br />
10 MU-R/043 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
11 MU-R/048 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
12 MU-R/049 1 1<br />
13 MU-R/051 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
14 MU-R/056 1 1 1<br />
15 MU-R/057<br />
16 MU-R/058 1 1<br />
17 MU-R/059 1 1<br />
18 MU-R/060 1 1<br />
19 MU-R/061 1<br />
20 MU-R/062 1 1<br />
21 MU-R/063 1 1 1 1 1<br />
22 Ua-R/001 1 1 1 1<br />
23 Ua-R/002 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
24 Ua-R/006 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
25 Ua-R/007 1 1 2 1 1<br />
26 Ua-R/008 1 1 1 1<br />
27 Ua-R/010 1 1 1 1 1<br />
28 Ua-R/011 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
29 Ua-R/012 1<br />
30 Ua-R/014<br />
31 Ua-R/016 1 1<br />
32 Ua-R/017 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
SNo PAP Identiy No<br />
Tele Tape<br />
Refri Tele<br />
Three Two Four Bus Cooking Others<br />
vision Recorder Radio greator Phone Cycles Wheelers Wheelers Wheelers Truck gas (Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
33 Ua-R/018 1 1 1 1<br />
34 Ua-R/019 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
35 Ua-R/020 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
36 Ua-R/021 1 1 1 1 1<br />
37 Ua-R/024 1 1 1 2 1 1<br />
38 Ua-R/025 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
39 Ua-R/026 1 1<br />
40 Ua-R/027 1 1 1 1 1<br />
41 Ua-R/028 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
42 Ua-R/029 1 1 1<br />
43 Ua-R/033 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
44 Ua-R/034 1 1 1 1<br />
45 Ua-R/035 1 1 1<br />
46 Ua-R/037 1<br />
47 Ua-R/038 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
48 Ua-R/039 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
49 Ua-R/040 1 1 1 1<br />
50 Ua-R/041 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
51 Ua-R/042 1 1 1 2 1 2 2<br />
52 Ua-R/043 4 5 2 5 8 5 4 4<br />
53 UA-R/003<br />
54 UA-R/004<br />
55 UA-R/010 1 1 1 1 1<br />
56 UA-R/011 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
57 UA-R/012 1 1 2 1 1<br />
58 UA-R/013 1 1 1 1<br />
59 UA-R/014<br />
60 UA-R/015 1 1<br />
61 UA-R/016<br />
62 UA-R/017<br />
63 UA-R/018 1 1 1<br />
64 UA-R/023 1 1 1 2 2 1<br />
65 UA-R/028 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
SNo PAP Identiy No<br />
Tele Tape<br />
Refri Tele<br />
Three Two Four Bus Cooking Others<br />
vision Recorder Radio greator Phone Cycles Wheelers Wheelers Wheelers Truck gas (Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
66 UA-R/029 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
67 UA-R/033<br />
68 UA-R/034 1<br />
69 UA-R/035 1 1 1 1<br />
70 UA-R/036 1 1 1 1 1<br />
71 UA-R/037 1 1 2 1 2<br />
72 UA-R/046 1 1<br />
73 UA-R/050 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
74 UA-R/051 1 1 1 1 1<br />
75 UA-R/053<br />
76 UA-R/056 1<br />
77 UA-R/057 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
78 UA-R/064 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
79 UA-R/065 1 1 1 1<br />
80 UA-R/066 1<br />
81 UA-R/067 1<br />
82 UA-R/068 1 1 1<br />
83 UA-R/069 1 1<br />
84 UA-R/070 1 1 1 1 1<br />
85 UA-R/076 1 1 1<br />
86 UA-R/077 1 1 1<br />
87 UA-R/078 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
88 UA-R/085 1<br />
89 UA-R/086 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
90 UA-R/087 1 1 1 1 1<br />
91 UA-R/088 1 1 1<br />
92 UA-R/090 1 1 1<br />
93 UA-R/091 1 1 1 1<br />
94 UA-R/097 1 1 1 1 1<br />
95 UA-R/115 1<br />
96 UA-R/120 1 1 1 1 1<br />
Una-Kalkhar
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
SNo<br />
PAP Identiy No<br />
Tele Tape<br />
Refri Tele<br />
Three Two Four Bus Cooking Others<br />
vision Recorder Radio greator Phone Cycles Wheelers Wheelers Wheelers Truck gas (Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
1 U NER/R-001 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
2 U NER/R-003 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
3 U NER/R-008 1<br />
4 U NER/R-010 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
5 U NER/R-011 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
6 U NER/R-012 1 1 1 1 1<br />
7 U NER/R-013<br />
8 U NER/R-014 1 1 1<br />
9 U NER/R-017 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
10 U NER/R-020 1 1 1 1<br />
11 U NER/R-026 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
12 U NER/R-029 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
13 U NER/R-039 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
14 U NER/R-041 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
15 U NER/R-042 1 1 1<br />
16 U NER/R-043 1 1 1 1<br />
17 U NER/R-045 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
18 U NER/R-046 1 1 1<br />
19 U NER/R-051 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
20 U NER/R-054 1 1 1 1<br />
21 U NER/R-056 1<br />
22 U NER/R-057 1 1 1 1<br />
23 U NER/R-058 1 1 1 1 1<br />
24 U NER/R-059 1 1<br />
25 U NER/R-060 1 1 1 1 1<br />
26 U NER/R-063 1 1 1<br />
27 U NER/R-064<br />
28 U NER/R-065 1 1 1 1<br />
29 U NER/R-066 1 1 11 1 1<br />
30 U NER/R-067 1 1 1 1<br />
31 U NER/R-069 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
32 U NER/R-070 1 1 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
SNo PAP Identiy No<br />
Tele Tape<br />
Refri Tele<br />
Three Two Four Bus Cooking Others<br />
vision Recorder Radio greator Phone Cycles Wheelers Wheelers Wheelers Truck gas (Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
33 U NER/R-071 1 1 1 1 1<br />
34 U NER/R-074 1 1 1<br />
35 U NER/R-076<br />
36 U NER/R-077<br />
37 U NER/R-082 1 1<br />
38 U NER/R-083 1 1 1<br />
39 U NER/R-095 1 1 1 1<br />
40 U NER/R-097 1 1 1 1<br />
41 U NER/R-099 1<br />
42 U NER/R-104 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
43 U NER/R-106 1 1 1 1<br />
44 U NER/R-109 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
45 U NER/R-110<br />
46 U NER/R-111 1 1 1 1<br />
47 U NER/R-112 1 1 1 1<br />
48 U NER/R-114 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
49 U NER/R-115<br />
50 U NER/R-116<br />
51 U NER/R-117<br />
52 U NER/R-118<br />
53 U NER/R-119 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
54 U NER/R-120<br />
55 U NER/R-121 1 1<br />
56 U NER/R-123 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3<br />
57 U NER/R-124<br />
58 U NER/R-125<br />
59 U NER/R-126 1 1 1 1<br />
60 U NER/R-127<br />
61 U NER/R-128 1 1<br />
62 U NER/R-129 1 1 1<br />
63 U NER/R-130<br />
64 U NER/R-131<br />
65 U NER/R-132
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
SNo PAP Identiy No<br />
Tele Tape<br />
Refri Tele<br />
Three Two Four Bus Cooking Others<br />
vision Recorder Radio greator Phone Cycles Wheelers Wheelers Wheelers Truck gas (Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
66 U NER/R-133 1 1 1 1 1<br />
67 U NER/R-135<br />
68 U NER/R-137 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
69 U NER/R-139<br />
70 U NER/R-140<br />
71 U NER/R-142 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
72 U NER/R-143<br />
73 U NER/R-147 1 1 1 1<br />
74 U NER/R-148 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
75 U NER/R-149 1 1 1 1<br />
76 U NER/R-150<br />
77 U NER/R-152 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
78 U NER/R-153<br />
79 U NER/R-154 1 1 1 1<br />
80 U NER/R-155 1 1 1<br />
81 U NER/R-156 1 1 1 1 1<br />
82 U NER/R-157<br />
83 U NER/R-158<br />
84 U NER/R-159 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
85 U NER/R-160<br />
86 U NER/R-161 1<br />
87 U NER/R-163 1 1 1<br />
88 U NER/R-172 1 1 1 1 1<br />
89 U NER/R-173 1 1<br />
90 U NER/R-174<br />
91 U NER/R-177 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
92 U NER/R-183 1 1<br />
93 U NER/R-187 1<br />
94 U NER/R-188 1<br />
95 U NER/R-190 1 1 1 1 1<br />
96 U NER/R-191 1<br />
97 U NER/R-199 1 1<br />
98 U NER/R-203 1 1 1 1
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
SNo PAP Identiy No<br />
Tele Tape<br />
Refri Tele<br />
Three Two Four Bus Cooking Others<br />
vision Recorder Radio greator Phone Cycles Wheelers Wheelers Wheelers Truck gas (Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
99 U NER/R-210<br />
100 U NER/R-211 1<br />
101 U NER/R-229 1 1 1<br />
102 U NER/R-230 1 1<br />
103 U NER/R-231<br />
104 U NER/R-236 1 1 1<br />
105 U NER/R-238<br />
106 U NER/R-247 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
107 U NER/R-249 1 1<br />
108 U NER/R-250 1 1 1<br />
109 U NER/R-251 1 1 1<br />
110 U NER/R-253 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
111 U NER/R-254 1 1<br />
112 U NER/R-255 1 1 1 1<br />
113 U NER/R-256 1<br />
114 U NER/R-257 1 1<br />
115 U NER/R-263 1 1 1 1<br />
116 U NER/R-266<br />
117 U NER/R-267 1<br />
118 U NER/R-269 1<br />
119 U NER/R-271 1<br />
120 U NER/R-272 1 1 1 1<br />
121 U NER/R-274 1 1<br />
122 U NER/R-279 1 1 1 1<br />
123 U NER/R-284 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
124 U NER/R-295 1 1 1 1 1<br />
125 U NER/R-296 1 1 1 2 1<br />
126 U NER/R-297 1 1 1 1<br />
127 U NER/R-298 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
128 U NER/R-299 1<br />
129 U NER/R-300 1 1 1 1<br />
130 U NER/R-304 1<br />
131 U NER/R-306
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
SNo PAP Identiy No<br />
Tele Tape<br />
Refri Tele<br />
Three Two Four Bus Cooking Others<br />
vision Recorder Radio greator Phone Cycles Wheelers Wheelers Wheelers Truck gas (Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
132 U NER/R-307 1 1 1<br />
133 U NER/R-308 1<br />
134 U NER/R-309 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
135 U NER/R-310<br />
136 U NER/R-311 1 1<br />
137 U NER/R-312 1 1 1 1 1<br />
138 U NER/R-316 1 1 1 1<br />
139 U NER/R-317 1 1 1<br />
140 U NER/R-319<br />
141 U NER/R-320 1<br />
142 U NER/R-321 1 1 1 1<br />
143 U NER/R-322 1 1<br />
144 U NER/R-323 1 1 1 1 1<br />
145 U NER/R-324 1 1 1 1 1<br />
146 U NER/R-326 1 1 1 1 1<br />
147 U NER/R-329 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
148 U NER/R-330 1 1<br />
149 U NER/R-331 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
150 U NER/R-332 1 1 1 1 1<br />
151 U NER/R-333 1 1 1 1 1<br />
Theog-Rohru<br />
1 TR/R-002 1 1 1<br />
2 TR/R-005 1<br />
3 TR/R-006 1 1 1<br />
4 TR/R-007 1<br />
5 TR/R-008 1 1<br />
6 TR/R-009 1 1 1 1<br />
7 TR/R-010 1 1<br />
8 TR/R-011 1 1 1 1<br />
9 TR/R-012<br />
10 TR/R-013
Possession <strong>of</strong> Material Asserts<br />
SNo PAP Identiy No<br />
Tele Tape<br />
Refri Tele<br />
Three Two Four Bus Cooking Others<br />
vision Recorder Radio greator Phone Cycles Wheelers Wheelers Wheelers Truck gas (Specify)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14<br />
11 TR/R-014 1<br />
12 TR/R-015 1 1 1<br />
13 TR/R-017 1 1 1 1 1<br />
14 TR/R-018<br />
15 TR/R-019<br />
16 TR/R-020<br />
17 TR/R-021 1 1<br />
18 TR/R-022 1 1 1<br />
19 TR/R-024<br />
20 TR/R-028 1 1<br />
21 TR/R-029 1 1 1<br />
22 TR/R-031 1 1<br />
23 TR/R-038 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
24 TR/R-041<br />
25 TR/R-042 1<br />
26 TR/R-043 1 1 1 1<br />
27 TR/R-044 1 1 1 1<br />
28 TR/R-045 1<br />
29 TR/R-047 1 1 1<br />
30 TR/R-048 1 1 1<br />
31 TR/R-052 1 1 1 1 1<br />
32 TR/R-058 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
33 TR/R-061 1<br />
34 TR/R-067 1<br />
35 TR/R-070 1 1<br />
36 TR/R-074 1 1<br />
37 TR/R-079 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
38 TR/R-080 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
39 TR/R-083 1 1 1 1<br />
40 TR/R-087 1<br />
41 TR/R-088<br />
42 TR/R-090 1 1 1 1 1<br />
43 TR/R-092 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 1
Live Stock Asserts<br />
SNo Pap Identiy No No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows Buffolows Sheep Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
Mehatpur-Una-Amb<br />
1 MU-R/015 1<br />
2 MU-R/016 2<br />
3 MU-R/018 1<br />
4 MU-R/020 1<br />
5 MU-R/032 1<br />
6 MU-R/034 1<br />
7 MU-R/037<br />
8 MU-R/039<br />
9 MU-R/040<br />
10 MU-R/043 1 2 ox<br />
11 MU-R/048 1<br />
12 MU-R/049 1<br />
13 MU-R/051<br />
14 MU-R/056 1<br />
15 MU-R/057<br />
16 MU-R/058<br />
17 MU-R/059<br />
18 MU-R/060<br />
19 MU-R/061 1<br />
20 MU-R/062 1<br />
21 MU-R/063 1 1<br />
22 Ua-R/001<br />
23 Ua-R/002 1<br />
24 Ua-R/006 1<br />
25 Ua-R/007<br />
26 Ua-R/008<br />
27 Ua-R/010<br />
28 Ua-R/011<br />
29 Ua-R/012 1<br />
30 Ua-R/014<br />
31 Ua-R/016 1<br />
32 Ua-R/017 1<br />
33 Ua-R/018 1<br />
34 Ua-R/019<br />
35 Ua-R/020<br />
36 Ua-R/021 2<br />
37 Ua-R/024<br />
38 Ua-R/025<br />
39 Ua-R/026 2<br />
40 Ua-R/027 2<br />
41 Ua-R/028 1<br />
42 Ua-R/029<br />
43 Ua-R/033<br />
44 Ua-R/034 1<br />
45 Ua-R/035<br />
46 Ua-R/037<br />
47 Ua-R/038 5 2 Calf<br />
48 Ua-R/039 3<br />
49 Ua-R/040<br />
50 Ua-R/041
Live Stock Asserts<br />
SNo Pap Identiy No No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows Buffolows Sheep Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
51 Ua-R/042 1<br />
52 Ua-R/043<br />
53 UA-R/003 2 3 2(ox)<br />
54 UA-R/004 1<br />
55 UA-R/010 1<br />
56 UA-R/011 1<br />
57 UA-R/012<br />
58 UA-R/013 1<br />
59 UA-R/014<br />
60 UA-R/015 4<br />
61 UA-R/016 3 2<br />
62 UA-R/017 3<br />
63 UA-R/018 1<br />
64 UA-R/023<br />
65 UA-R/028 1<br />
66 UA-R/029<br />
67 UA-R/033<br />
68 UA-R/034 2<br />
69 UA-R/035<br />
70 UA-R/036 2<br />
71 UA-R/037 2<br />
72 UA-R/046 1<br />
73 UA-R/050 2<br />
74 UA-R/051 3 4<br />
75 UA-R/053 1<br />
76 UA-R/056 1<br />
77 UA-R/057 2<br />
78 UA-R/064 2<br />
79 UA-R/065 1<br />
80 UA-R/066 1<br />
81 UA-R/067 1<br />
82 UA-R/068 1 2<br />
83 UA-R/069 2<br />
84 UA-R/070 2 ox<br />
85 UA-R/076 3<br />
86 UA-R/077 3<br />
87 UA-R/078<br />
88 UA-R/085<br />
89 UA-R/086<br />
90 UA-R/087 1<br />
91 UA-R/088 2 2 ox<br />
92 UA-R/090 2 2 ox<br />
93 UA-R/091 2 2 2 ox<br />
94 UA-R/097 1<br />
95 UA-R/115 1<br />
96 UA-R/120 2<br />
Una-Kalkhar<br />
1 U NER/R-001 2<br />
2 U NER/R-003 2
Live Stock Asserts<br />
SNo Pap Identiy No No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows Buffolows Sheep Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
3 U NER/R-008<br />
4 U NER/R-010<br />
5 U NER/R-011 1<br />
6 U NER/R-012 1 1<br />
7 U NER/R-013 1 1<br />
8 U NER/R-014<br />
9 U NER/R-017<br />
10 U NER/R-020 1<br />
11 U NER/R-026 2<br />
12 U NER/R-029 1<br />
13 U NER/R-039<br />
14 U NER/R-041<br />
15 U NER/R-042 2<br />
16 U NER/R-043<br />
17 U NER/R-045<br />
18 U NER/R-046 2 1 2<br />
19 U NER/R-051 1<br />
20 U NER/R-054 1<br />
21 U NER/R-056 1<br />
22 U NER/R-057 2<br />
23 U NER/R-058 1 2<br />
24 U NER/R-059 2<br />
25 U NER/R-060 1<br />
26 U NER/R-063<br />
27 U NER/R-064 1<br />
28 U NER/R-065 2<br />
29 U NER/R-066 1<br />
30 U NER/R-067<br />
31 U NER/R-069 1<br />
32 U NER/R-070<br />
33 U NER/R-071 1<br />
34 U NER/R-074 1<br />
35 U NER/R-076 1<br />
36 U NER/R-077<br />
37 U NER/R-082<br />
38 U NER/R-083 1<br />
39 U NER/R-095 2<br />
40 U NER/R-097<br />
41 U NER/R-099 1<br />
42 U NER/R-104 1<br />
43 U NER/R-106 1<br />
44 U NER/R-109 2<br />
45 U NER/R-110 1<br />
46 U NER/R-111 2<br />
47 U NER/R-112<br />
48 U NER/R-114 2 2<br />
49 U NER/R-115<br />
50 U NER/R-116<br />
51 U NER/R-117<br />
52 U NER/R-118<br />
53 U NER/R-119
Live Stock Asserts<br />
SNo Pap Identiy No No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows Buffolows Sheep Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
54 U NER/R-120<br />
55 U NER/R-121<br />
56 U NER/R-123 3<br />
57 U NER/R-124<br />
58 U NER/R-125<br />
59 U NER/R-126<br />
60 U NER/R-127<br />
61 U NER/R-128<br />
62 U NER/R-129<br />
63 U NER/R-130<br />
64 U NER/R-131<br />
65 U NER/R-132<br />
66 U NER/R-133<br />
67 U NER/R-135<br />
68 U NER/R-137<br />
69 U NER/R-139<br />
70 U NER/R-140<br />
71 U NER/R-142<br />
72 U NER/R-143<br />
73 U NER/R-147<br />
74 U NER/R-148 1<br />
75 U NER/R-149 1<br />
76 U NER/R-150<br />
77 U NER/R-152<br />
78 U NER/R-153<br />
79 U NER/R-154<br />
80 U NER/R-155<br />
81 U NER/R-156 1<br />
82 U NER/R-157<br />
83 U NER/R-158<br />
84 U NER/R-159<br />
85 U NER/R-160<br />
86 U NER/R-161<br />
87 U NER/R-163 1<br />
88 U NER/R-172 1<br />
89 U NER/R-173<br />
90 U NER/R-174<br />
91 U NER/R-177<br />
92 U NER/R-183<br />
93 U NER/R-187 2<br />
94 U NER/R-188<br />
95 U NER/R-190<br />
96 U NER/R-191<br />
97 U NER/R-199 2<br />
98 U NER/R-203<br />
99 U NER/R-210<br />
100 U NER/R-211<br />
101 U NER/R-229<br />
102 U NER/R-230<br />
103 U NER/R-231<br />
104 U NER/R-236
Live Stock Asserts<br />
SNo Pap Identiy No No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows Buffolows Sheep Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
105 U NER/R-238 1 2<br />
106 U NER/R-247<br />
107 U NER/R-249 1<br />
108 U NER/R-250<br />
109 U NER/R-251 1<br />
110 U NER/R-253<br />
111 U NER/R-254 2<br />
112 U NER/R-255 1 1<br />
113 U NER/R-256 1 2<br />
114 U NER/R-257 2<br />
115 U NER/R-263<br />
116 U NER/R-266<br />
117 U NER/R-267 1<br />
118 U NER/R-269<br />
119 U NER/R-271<br />
120 U NER/R-272 2<br />
121 U NER/R-274 1<br />
122 U NER/R-279<br />
123 U NER/R-284<br />
124 U NER/R-295<br />
125 U NER/R-296<br />
126 U NER/R-297 2<br />
127 U NER/R-298 1<br />
128 U NER/R-299<br />
129 U NER/R-300 2<br />
130 U NER/R-304 1<br />
131 U NER/R-306 1<br />
132 U NER/R-307 1<br />
133 U NER/R-308<br />
134 U NER/R-309 1<br />
135 U NER/R-310<br />
136 U NER/R-311<br />
137 U NER/R-312<br />
138 U NER/R-316 1<br />
139 U NER/R-317<br />
140 U NER/R-319<br />
141 U NER/R-320<br />
142 U NER/R-321<br />
143 U NER/R-322 2<br />
144 U NER/R-323<br />
145 U NER/R-324 1<br />
146 U NER/R-326 1 2<br />
147 U NER/R-329<br />
148 U NER/R-330 1<br />
149 U NER/R-331<br />
150 U NER/R-332<br />
151 U NER/R-333<br />
Theog-Rohru<br />
1 TR/R-002 1
Live Stock Asserts<br />
SNo Pap Identiy No No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong> No <strong>of</strong><br />
Cows Buffolows Sheep Goats Poultry Others<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
2 TR/R-005<br />
3 TR/R-006<br />
4 TR/R-007 2<br />
5 TR/R-008<br />
6 TR/R-009<br />
7 TR/R-010<br />
8 TR/R-011<br />
9 TR/R-012<br />
10 TR/R-013<br />
11 TR/R-014<br />
12 TR/R-015<br />
13 TR/R-017 2 2<br />
14 TR/R-018<br />
15 TR/R-019<br />
16 TR/R-020<br />
17 TR/R-021<br />
18 TR/R-022<br />
19 TR/R-024<br />
20 TR/R-028 1<br />
21 TR/R-029 1 1<br />
22 TR/R-031 1<br />
23 TR/R-038 1<br />
24 TR/R-041<br />
25 TR/R-042<br />
26 TR/R-043<br />
27 TR/R-044<br />
28 TR/R-045<br />
29 TR/R-047<br />
30 TR/R-048 1<br />
31 TR/R-052 2<br />
32 TR/R-058 1<br />
33 TR/R-061<br />
34 TR/R-067<br />
35 TR/R-070<br />
36 TR/R-074 1<br />
37 TR/R-079<br />
38 TR/R-080 2<br />
39 TR/R-083 1<br />
40 TR/R-087 3 3<br />
41 TR/R-088<br />
42 TR/R-090 1<br />
43 TR/R-092 1
Sno<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Residence getting<br />
affected<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Commerical Structure<br />
getting affected<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
How Far<br />
How Far<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
Mehatpur-Una-Amb<br />
1 MU-R/015 2<br />
2 MU-R/016 2<br />
3 MU-R/018 2<br />
4 MU-R/020 1 a 2<br />
5 MU-R/032 2 1 a 2<br />
6 MU-R/034 1 1 a 2<br />
7 MU-R/037 2<br />
8 MU-R/039 2<br />
9 MU-R/040 2<br />
10 MU-R/043 1 b 2<br />
11 MU-R/048 2 1 b 1 b 2<br />
12 MU-R/049 2<br />
13 MU-R/051 2 1 a 1 a 2<br />
14 MU-R/056 2<br />
15 MU-R/057 2<br />
16 MU-R/058 2<br />
17 MU-R/059 2<br />
18 MU-R/060 1 a 2<br />
19 MU-R/061 2 1 a 2<br />
20 MU-R/062 1 a 2<br />
21 MU-R/063 1 a 2<br />
22 Ua-R/001 1 a 2<br />
23 Ua-R/002 1 1 a 2<br />
24 Ua-R/006 1 a 2<br />
25 Ua-R/007 Cant Say 2<br />
26 Ua-R/008 2<br />
27 Ua-R/010 1 1 a 2<br />
28 Ua-R/011 2 1 b 1 b 2<br />
29 Ua-R/012 2<br />
30 Ua-R/014 1 1 a a 2<br />
31 Ua-R/016 2 1 a 2<br />
32 Ua-R/017 1 2 a 2<br />
33 Ua-R/018 1 1 a 2<br />
34 Ua-R/019 1 2<br />
35 Ua-R/020 2 1 a 2<br />
36 Ua-R/021 2 1 a 2<br />
37 Ua-R/024 2 1 a 2<br />
38 Ua-R/025 2 1 a 2<br />
39 Ua-R/026<br />
40 Ua-R/027<br />
41 Ua-R/028 a<br />
42 Ua-R/029<br />
43 Ua-R/033<br />
44 Ua-R/034<br />
45 Ua-R/035<br />
46 Ua-R/037<br />
47 Ua-R/038<br />
48 Ua-R/039 2 a<br />
49 Ua-R/040<br />
50 Ua-R/041<br />
51 Ua-R/042 1 2 a 1 a
Sno<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Residence getting<br />
affected<br />
Commerical Structure<br />
getting affected<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
52 Ua-R/043 2 1 a<br />
53 UA-R/003 2 2<br />
54 UA-R/004 2 1 a<br />
55 UA-R/010<br />
56 UA-R/011<br />
57 UA-R/012 1 a 2<br />
58 UA-R/013 2<br />
59 UA-R/014 2 1<br />
60 UA-R/015 1 1 1 2<br />
61 UA-R/016 2 1 2<br />
62 UA-R/017 1 1 1 2<br />
63 UA-R/018 2 1 1 2<br />
64 UA-R/023 1 1 2<br />
65 UA-R/028 1 2<br />
66 UA-R/029 1<br />
67 UA-R/033 2<br />
68 UA-R/034 2 1 a<br />
69 UA-R/035 1 1 a<br />
70 UA-R/036 1 1 c<br />
71 UA-R/037 2 1 a<br />
72 UA-R/046<br />
73 UA-R/050 1 1 a<br />
74 UA-R/051 2 1 a<br />
75 UA-R/053 1 1 a<br />
76 UA-R/056<br />
77 UA-R/057<br />
78 UA-R/064 1 1 a<br />
79 UA-R/065 1 1 a 1 a<br />
80 UA-R/066<br />
81 UA-R/067 1 a<br />
82 UA-R/068 1 1 a 1 a<br />
83 UA-R/069 1 a<br />
84 UA-R/070 1 a<br />
85 UA-R/076 2 1 a<br />
86 UA-R/077 2 1 a<br />
87 UA-R/078 2 1 a 1 a<br />
88 UA-R/085<br />
89 UA-R/086 1 a<br />
90 UA-R/087 1 a<br />
91 UA-R/088 1 a<br />
92 UA-R/090 1 1 a<br />
93 UA-R/091 2 1 a<br />
94 UA-R/097 1 a<br />
95 UA-R/115 1 a<br />
96 UA-R/120<br />
Una-Kalkhar<br />
1 U NER/R-001<br />
2 U NER/R-003 1 a<br />
3 U NER/R-008
Sno<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Residence getting<br />
affected<br />
Commerical Structure<br />
getting affected<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
4 U NER/R-010 1 a<br />
5 U NER/R-011 1 a<br />
6 U NER/R-012 1 a<br />
7 U NER/R-013 1 a<br />
8 U NER/R-014 1 a<br />
9 U NER/R-017 2 a<br />
10 U NER/R-020<br />
11 U NER/R-026 2 a<br />
12 U NER/R-029 2 a<br />
13 U NER/R-041 2 a 1 a<br />
14 U NER/R-042<br />
15 U NER/R-045 2 a<br />
16 U NER/R-046 2 a<br />
17 U NER/R-051 2 a<br />
18 U NER/R-054 2 a<br />
19 U NER/R-056 2 b<br />
20 U NER/R-057 2 a<br />
21 U NER/R-058 2 a<br />
22 U NER/R-059 2 b<br />
23 U NER/R-060 2 a<br />
24 U NER/R-063<br />
25 U NER/R-064<br />
26 U NER/R-065<br />
27 U NER/R-066 2 a 1 a<br />
28 U NER/R-067<br />
29 U NER/R-069 1 a<br />
30 U NER/R-070<br />
31 U NER/R-071 2 b<br />
32 U NER/R-074 1 a<br />
33 U NER/R-076<br />
34 U NER/R-077 2 a<br />
35 U NER/R-082 2 a<br />
36 U NER/R-083 1 a<br />
37 U NER/R-095 1 a<br />
38 U NER/R-097 2 a<br />
39 U NER/R-099 2 a<br />
40 U NER/R-104 2 a<br />
41 U NER/R-106 1 a<br />
42 U NER/R-109 2 a<br />
43 U NER/R-110 2 a<br />
44 U NER/R-111 1 a<br />
45 U NER/R-112 a<br />
46 U NER/R-114<br />
47 U NER/R-115<br />
48 U NER/R-116<br />
49 U NER/R-117<br />
50 U NER/R-118<br />
51 U NER/R-119 1 a 2<br />
52 U NER/R-120<br />
53 U NER/R-121 2<br />
54 U NER/R-123 2 1 a 2<br />
55 U NER/R-124
Sno<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Residence getting<br />
affected<br />
Commerical Structure<br />
getting affected<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
56 U NER/R-125<br />
57 U NER/R-126 2<br />
58 U NER/R-127<br />
59 U NER/R-128 2<br />
60 U NER/R-129 2 a 2<br />
61 U NER/R-130<br />
62 U NER/R-131<br />
63 U NER/R-132<br />
64 U NER/R-133 1 2<br />
65 U NER/R-135 2 a 2<br />
66 U NER/R-137 2 a 2<br />
67 U NER/R-139<br />
68 U NER/R-140<br />
69 U NER/R-142 2 a 2<br />
70 U NER/R-147 2<br />
71 U NER/R-148 1 a 2<br />
72 U NER/R-149 1 a 2<br />
73 U NER/R-150<br />
74 U NER/R-151<br />
75 U NER/R-152 2 1 a 2<br />
76 U NER/R-153<br />
77 U NER/R-154 2 a 2<br />
78 U NER/R-155 2 a 2<br />
79 U NER/R-156 2 a 1 a 2<br />
80 U NER/R-157<br />
81 U NER/R-158<br />
82 U NER/R-159 2 a 2<br />
83 U NER/R-160<br />
84 U NER/R-161 2 a 2<br />
85 U NER/R-163 2 a<br />
86 U NER/R-172 a 2<br />
87 U NER/R-173 1 a 2<br />
88 U NER/R-175 1 2<br />
89 U NER/R-177 2 a 1 a 2<br />
90 U NER/R-183 1 a 2<br />
91 U NER/R-187 2 b 1 2<br />
92 U NER/R-188 2 a<br />
93 U NER/R-190 2 1 a 2<br />
94 U NER/R-191 2 a 1 2<br />
95 U NER/R-197<br />
96 U NER/R-199 2 a 2<br />
97 U NER/R-203 2 a 1 a<br />
98 U NER/R-210<br />
99 U NER/R-211 2 1 a 2<br />
100 U NER/R-229 1 2<br />
101 U NER/R-230 2 a 2<br />
102 U NER/R-231 2 1 a 1 a 2<br />
103 U NER/R-236 2 a 2<br />
104 U NER/R-238 2 a 2<br />
105 U NER/R-247 2 a 2<br />
106 U NER/R-249 1 2<br />
107 U NER/R-250 1 2
Sno<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Residence getting<br />
affected<br />
Commerical Structure<br />
getting affected<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
108 U NER/R-253 2 1 a 1 a<br />
109 U NER/R-254 1 2<br />
110 U NER/R-255 1 2<br />
111 U NER/R-256 1 2<br />
112 U NER/R-257 1 2<br />
113 U NER/R-263 2 a 2<br />
114 U NER/R-266 2<br />
115 U NER/R-267 2 a 2<br />
116 U NER/R-269 2 b 2<br />
117 U NER/R-271 2 a 2<br />
118 U NER/R-272 2 a 1 a 2<br />
119 U NER/R-274<br />
120 U NER/R-279 2 a 2<br />
121 U NER/R-284 1 a 2<br />
122 U NER/R-307 1 a<br />
123 U NER/R-308<br />
124 U NER/R-309 1 a<br />
125 U NER/R-310 2 1 a<br />
126 U NER/R-311 2 1 a<br />
127 U NER/R-312 1 a<br />
128 U NER/R-316 1 a<br />
129 U NER/R-317 2 1 a<br />
130 U NER/R-319 2 1 c<br />
131 U NER/R-320 2 1 a<br />
132 U NER/R-321<br />
133 U NER/R-322 2 1 b<br />
134 U NER/R-323 2 1 a 1 a<br />
135 U NER/R-324<br />
136 U NER/R-326 2 1 a 1 a<br />
137 U NER/R-329 2 1 a 1 a<br />
138 U NER/R-330 2 1 a<br />
139 U NER/R-331 2 1 a 1 a<br />
140 U NER/R-332 2 1 a 1 a<br />
141 U NER/R-333 2 1 a 1 a<br />
Theo-Rohru<br />
1 TR/R-002 2 1 a no<br />
2 TR/R-005 no<br />
3 TR/R-006 no<br />
4 TR/R-007 no<br />
5 TR/R-008 no<br />
6 TR/R-009 no<br />
7 TR/R-010 1 b no<br />
8 TR/R-011 1 a no<br />
9 TR/R-012 no<br />
10 TR/R-013 no<br />
11 TR/R-014 no<br />
12 TR/R-015 no<br />
13 TR/R-017 no<br />
14 TR/R-018 no
Sno<br />
Pap Identiy No<br />
Resettlement and Rehablitation Options <strong>of</strong> the PAP's<br />
Are you<br />
willing to<br />
resettle<br />
Voluntarily<br />
Residence getting<br />
affected<br />
Commerical Structure<br />
getting affected<br />
Working<br />
Children<br />
How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure How Far<br />
What is your<br />
prefered<br />
rehablitation<br />
measure<br />
Any Child<br />
Below 14<br />
Working ??<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
15 TR/R-019 no<br />
16 TR/R-020 no<br />
17 TR/R-021 no<br />
18 TR/R-022 2 1 a no<br />
19 TR/R-028 1 a no<br />
20 TR/R-029 2 1 a no<br />
21 TR/R-031 1 a no<br />
22 TR/R-038 1 a no<br />
23 TR/R-041 no<br />
24 TR/R-042 no<br />
25 TR/R-043 no<br />
26 TR/R-044 no<br />
27 TR/R-045 no<br />
28 TR/R-047 no<br />
29 TR/R-048 no<br />
30 TR/R-052 2 1 a no<br />
31 TR/R-058 2 1 a no<br />
32 TR/R-061 no<br />
33 TR/R-067 no<br />
34 TR/R-070 2 1 a 1 a no<br />
35 TR/R-074 2 1 a no<br />
36 TR/R-079 2 1 a no<br />
37 TR/R-080 2 1 a no<br />
38 TR/R-083 no<br />
39 TR/R-087 2 1 b no<br />
40 TR/R-088 2 1 b no<br />
41 TR/R-090 2 1 a no<br />
42 TR/R-092 2 1 a no
Codes Used in Socio- Economic Baseline Survey<br />
Slno Survey Enquiries Codes Used <strong>Description</strong><br />
1 Likely to be affected by the <strong>Project</strong> 1 Structure<br />
2 Relationship to the Head <strong>of</strong> the Family 1 Self<br />
2 Wife<br />
3 Son/Daughter<br />
4 Brother/Sister<br />
5 Son-in-law/Daughter-in-law<br />
6 Parents<br />
7 Grand Children<br />
8 Others<br />
3 Religion 1 Hindu<br />
2 Muslim<br />
3 Christian<br />
4 Sikh<br />
4 Social Status 1 SC<br />
2ST<br />
3 OBC<br />
4 General<br />
5 Status <strong>of</strong> Property a Title Holder<br />
b Tenant<br />
c Non Title Holder<br />
6 Tupe <strong>of</strong> Use 1 Residential<br />
2 Commerical<br />
3 Residential Cum Commerical<br />
4 Cow Shed<br />
5 Boundry Wall<br />
6 Only Foundation<br />
7 Abandoned Structure<br />
8 Store/Garage/Others<br />
7 Tenure Status 1 Own<br />
2 Rented<br />
8 Gender 1 Male<br />
2 Female<br />
9 Marital Status 1 Unmarried<br />
2 Married<br />
3 Widow/ Widower<br />
4 Divorcee/ Seperated<br />
10 Qualification 1 Illiterate<br />
2 Primary<br />
3 Secondary<br />
4 High School<br />
5 Under Graduate<br />
6 Graduate<br />
7 Post Graduate<br />
8 Diploma/ Doctorate<br />
11 Occupation 1 Farming<br />
2 Farm-Labor<br />
3 Daily Wage Labor<br />
4 Service<br />
5 Business<br />
6 Animal Husbandry<br />
7 Others<br />
12 Willing - Ness <strong>of</strong> Resettlemenrt 1 Yes<br />
2No<br />
13 How Far 1 Within the village or Town
Slno Survey Enquiries Codes Used <strong>Description</strong><br />
14 Preferred Rehabilitation Measure<br />
a Replacement Value and<br />
Rehabilitation Grant<br />
b Plot on cost basis,<br />
Replacement Value and<br />
Rehabilitation Grant<br />
c Free Plot and construction<br />
Allowances (Vulnerable)<br />
15 Tenant Residential Getting Affected<br />
a Shifting Allowance and Rental<br />
Allowance<br />
b Self Relocation<br />
16 Tenant Commerical Getting Affected<br />
Shifting Allowance, Rental<br />
a Allowance and Training
Chainage Temple/ Shrine/ Church/ Mosque/<br />
dargha/ Bus stop/ HP/ Water tap/ school/<br />
hospital/ government building<br />
Annexure - IV<br />
Name LHS RHS Dist. from<br />
C.L.<br />
Construction type-<br />
PUCCA/ Semi- Pucca<br />
/Kuccha<br />
Una - Nerchowk<br />
0.069 Pre paid Taxi union Una Una Nerchowk Bus Stand √ SP<br />
0.118 Hand pump Una Nerchowk Bus Stand √ 9.5<br />
0.300 Hand pump Una Nerchowk Bus Stand √ 9.0<br />
0.360 Hand pump Near Suvidha Hotel √ 7.5<br />
0.560 Hand pump Hamirpur Road Una √ 8.9<br />
0.564 Water Tank Hamirpur Road Una √ 8.9 Pucca<br />
0.610 Hand pump Hamirpur Road Una √ 9.9<br />
0.750 Water Tank Adarsh Nagar Una √ 8.5 Pucca<br />
1.040 Hand pump Lower Arniala √ 8.6<br />
1.290 Hand pump Lower Arniala √ 9.0<br />
1.383 Hand pump Lower Arniala √ 9.0<br />
1.780 Hand pump Kotla Upper √ 8.5<br />
2.230 Hand pump Ajnoli √ 5.4<br />
3.030 Hand pump Dongoli √ 7.0<br />
3.600 Bus Stop Barnoh √ 5.2 SP<br />
3.845 Water tap Barnoh √ 5.2<br />
5.220 Water tap Barnoh √ 9.2<br />
5.480 Water tap Samoor Kalan √ 6.0<br />
6.100 Water tap Samoor Kalan √ 6.5<br />
10.055 Water tap Jogipanga √ 5.6<br />
10.650 Rural development dept. Bangana Industr Jogipanga √ 11.2 Pucca<br />
cum Training centre Jogipanga, Bangana √ 11.2 Pucca<br />
11.255 Well Jogipanga √ 38.0 Pucca<br />
12.720 Water Tank Khurwain √ 6.3 Pucca<br />
12.736 Hand pump Khurwain √ 4.4
Chainage Temple/ Shrine/ Church/ Mosque/ Name LHS RHS Dist. from<br />
dargha/ Bus stop/ HP/ Water tap/ school/<br />
C.L.<br />
hospital/ government building<br />
Construction type-<br />
PUCCA/ Semi- Pucca<br />
/Kuccha<br />
12.805 Bus Stop Khurwain √ 6.0 Pucca<br />
12.825 Temple + Boundry wall Khurwain √ 6.3 Pucca<br />
Temple √ 6.3 Pucca<br />
13.000 Hand pump Khurwain √ 9.2<br />
13.510 Water tap Khurwain √ 9.5<br />
13.570 Hand pump Khurwain √ 6.5<br />
14.050 Hand pump Kuwari √ 6.0<br />
14.350 Hand pump Kuwari √ 5.8<br />
14.085 Religious Tree with platform Kuwari √ 5.5 Pucca<br />
18.710 Public Toilet Thanna Kalan √ 5.0 Pucca<br />
19.180 Hand pump Thanna Kalan √ 4.7<br />
21.390 Public Toilet Hari Nagar √ 7.0 Pucca<br />
21.395 Water Tank Hari Nagar √ 7.0 Pucca<br />
21.650 Hand pump Hari Nagar √ 5.5<br />
22.040 Hand pump Hari Nagar √ 4.0<br />
25.355 water tap Nalwari √ 4.4<br />
25.855 Hand pump Doomkhar √ 4.7<br />
25.870 Co-opreative society Doomkhar √ Pucca<br />
26.340 Water Tap Doomkhar √ 10.0<br />
27.700 Hand pump Bangana √ 4.3<br />
29.840 Religious Tree with platform Dohgi Village √ 4.5 Pucca<br />
30.085 Water tap Sarlon village √ 5.5<br />
31.680 Water tank Dhandla village √ 5.4 Pucca<br />
31.710 water tap Dhandla village √ 5.8<br />
31.940 water tap Dhandla village √ 5.8<br />
31.955 Bus Stop Dhandla village √ 5.9 Pucca<br />
32.580 water tank Malangar village √ 6.6 Pucca
Chainage Temple/ Shrine/ Church/ Mosque/ Name LHS RHS Dist. from<br />
dargha/ Bus stop/ HP/ Water tap/ school/<br />
C.L.<br />
hospital/ government building<br />
Construction type-<br />
PUCCA/ Semi- Pucca<br />
/Kuccha<br />
34.250 Hand pump Malangar village √ 4.3<br />
34.260 Bus Stop Malangar village √ 5.6 Pucca<br />
34.550 Well Amrola village √ 4.6 Pucca<br />
34.810 Hand pump Amrola village √ 4.6<br />
34.815 Bus Stop Amrola village √ 5.0 Pucca<br />
34.860 Mahila mandal bhawan Amrola village √ 4.2 Pucca<br />
34.865 Temple Amrola village √ 4.2 Pucca<br />
34.870 Religious Tree with platform Amrola village √ 4.2 Pucca<br />
36.630 Religious Tree with platform Tanoh village √ 4.2 Pucca<br />
36.720 Bus Stop Tanoh village √ 4.5 Pucca<br />
38.300 Water tank Ghoti village √ 9.0 Pucca<br />
39.140 Religious Tree with platform Dadiar village √ 6.2 Pucca<br />
41.440 Janjghar Jalgraon village √ 11.0 Pucca<br />
41.445 Religious Tree with platform Jalgraon village √ 5.4 Pucca<br />
41.445 water tank Jalgraon village √ 8.2 Pucca<br />
47.668 Hand pump Barsar √ 6.7<br />
47.938 Water tank Barsar √ 6.2 Pucca<br />
47.940 Bus Stop Barsar √ 6.5 Pucca<br />
47.960 Hand pump Barsar √ 6.1<br />
48.100 Religious Tree with platform Barsar √ 4.5 Pucca<br />
50.280 Religious Tree with platform Bakreri village √ 5.8 Pucca<br />
50.510 Hand pump Bakreri village √ 7.0<br />
50.540 Temple (boundry wall) Bakreri village √ 4.6 Pucca<br />
50.755 Hand pump Bakreri village √ 5.3<br />
51.140 water tap Baggi village √ 5.4<br />
51.250 Hand pump Baggi village √ 5.7<br />
51.285 Religious Tree with platform Baggi village √ 5.4 Pucca
Chainage Temple/ Shrine/ Church/ Mosque/ Name LHS RHS Dist. from<br />
dargha/ Bus stop/ HP/ Water tap/ school/<br />
C.L.<br />
hospital/ government building<br />
Construction type-<br />
PUCCA/ Semi- Pucca<br />
/Kuccha<br />
51.950 Hand pump Banni village √ 7.2<br />
52.025 Religious Tree with platform Banni village √ 3.3 Pucca<br />
52.030 water tank Banni village √ 3.4 Pucca<br />
52.165 water tap Banni village √ 5.3<br />
52.600 Hand pump Mangroli villade √ 5.4<br />
52.780 Hand pump Mangroli villade √ 7.3<br />
54.510 Bus Stop Joal village √ 7.4 Pucca<br />
55.320 Hand pump Joal village √ 6.0<br />
55.610 Temple Tikkar Brahmana √ 5.0 Pucca<br />
55.618 Hand pump Tikkar Brahmana √ 3.5<br />
56.000 Well Bumblu √ 4.5 Pucca<br />
56.040 Water tank Bumblu √ 4.4 Pucca<br />
56.045 Bus Stop Bumblu √ 4.0 Pucca<br />
57.000 janjghar Haar village √ 7.6 Pucca<br />
57.585 Hand pump Haar village √ 5.3<br />
59.540 Hand pump Saloni village √ 7.0<br />
59.600 Hand pump Saloni village √ 6.0<br />
59.605 water tank Saloni village √ 6.5 Pucca<br />
59.610 Bus Stop Saloni village √ 6.5 Pucca<br />
59.645 water tap Saloni village √ 4.9<br />
70.520 water tank Aghar village √ 5.0 Pucca<br />
70.780 Well Aghar village √ Pucca<br />
72.750 Hand pump Koti village √ 4.9<br />
72.800 well Koti village √ 7.7 Pucca<br />
73.530 PWD store Ball village √ 6.0 Pucca<br />
73.590 Bus Stop Ball village √ 8.8 Pucca<br />
75.020 water tap Balokhar village √ 4.4
Chainage Temple/ Shrine/ Church/ Mosque/ Name LHS RHS Dist. from<br />
dargha/ Bus stop/ HP/ Water tap/ school/<br />
C.L.<br />
hospital/ government building<br />
Construction type-<br />
PUCCA/ Semi- Pucca<br />
/Kuccha<br />
75.110 Water tank Balokhar village √ 7.6 Pucca<br />
75.110 Bus Stop Balokhar village √ 9.9 Pucca<br />
75.190 Hand pump Balokhar village √ 5.0<br />
75.865 Hand pump Patta village √ 5.4<br />
76.210 Hand pump Patta village √ 6.4<br />
76.385 water tap Patta village √ 4.6<br />
76.485 Hand pump Patta village √ 4.5<br />
77.085 water tank Jharlog village √ 5.6 Pucca<br />
77.275 Hand pump Jharlog village √ 4.9<br />
77.335 Religious Tree with platform Jharlog village √ 7.7 Pucca<br />
77.340 Janjghar Jharlog village √ 6.2 Pucca<br />
78.000 Hand pump jharlog village √ 6.0<br />
78.495 Hand pump Ladror Khurd √ 9.1/4.5<br />
78.500 Bus Stop Ladror Khurd √ 5.0 Pucca<br />
78.925 water tap Ladror Khurd √ 5.7<br />
79.060 water tap Ladror Khurd √ 4.0<br />
79.065 water tap Ladror Khurd √ 4.5<br />
79.360 water tap Ladror Khurd √ 3.5<br />
79.065 temple Ladror Khurd √ 4.6 Pucca<br />
79.560 water tap Ladror Khurd √ 4.4<br />
79.845 Hand pump Ladror Khurd √ 5.0<br />
80.920 Hand pump Bori chowk √ 6.5<br />
82.020 Religious Tree with platform Bori chowk √ 4.7 Pucca<br />
82.540 Hand pump Tamroh village √ 5.3<br />
83.125 water tap Tamroh village √ 5.0<br />
83.260 water tap Kharota village √<br />
83.270 water tap Kharota village √ 3.0
Chainage Temple/ Shrine/ Church/ Mosque/ Name LHS RHS Dist. from<br />
dargha/ Bus stop/ HP/ Water tap/ school/<br />
C.L.<br />
hospital/ government building<br />
Construction type-<br />
PUCCA/ Semi- Pucca<br />
/Kuccha<br />
83.350 Hand pump Kharota village √ 4.6<br />
83.460 Religious Tree with platform Kharota village √ 2.7 Pucca<br />
83.465 temple Kharota village √ 5.2 Pucca<br />
83.810 water tap Kharota village √ 3.8<br />
84.675 Hand pump Manoh village √ 5.4<br />
84.680 Bus Stop Manoh village √ 5.6 Pucca<br />
84.680 water tap Manoh village √ 4.8<br />
87.265 Religious Tree with Platform Mundkhar village √ 5.8 Pucca<br />
87.710 Hand pump Mundkhar village √ 7.2<br />
88.020 Hand pump Mundkhar village √ 6.3<br />
88.820 Well Mundkhar village √ 11.5 Pucca<br />
94.120 Hand pump Bhamla village √ 4.8<br />
94.210 Religious Tree with Platform Bhamla village √ 6.9 Pucca<br />
94.280 Hand pump Bhamla village √ 5.3<br />
96.440 Hand pump Bhamla village √ 5.6<br />
97.810 Forest Check Post Upper Bhamla √ 3.2 Pucca<br />
97.810 Religious Tree with Platform Upper Bhamla √ 5.0 Pucca<br />
102.100 Primary health centre Dhalwan village √ 13.5 Pucca<br />
102.320 Hand pump Dhalwan village √ 5.0<br />
102.810 Bus stop Dhalwan village √ 4.6 Pucca<br />
104.510 Temple Masiani √ 8.5 Pucca<br />
105.895 Water tank Tamakh √ 3.5 Pucca<br />
106.600 Temple Tamakh √ 15.0 Pucca<br />
109.760 Water tank Tamakh √ 6.4 Pucca<br />
111.900 Water tank Amblagalu √ 5.3 Pucca<br />
113.955 water tap Kalkhar village √ 3.5<br />
113.855 water tap Kalkhar village √ 4.3
Chainage Temple/ Shrine/ Church/ Mosque/ Name LHS RHS Dist. from<br />
dargha/ Bus stop/ HP/ Water tap/ school/<br />
C.L.<br />
hospital/ government building<br />
Construction type-<br />
PUCCA/ Semi- Pucca<br />
/Kuccha<br />
113.950 water tap Kalkhar village √ 6.1<br />
Water tank Kalkhar village √<br />
Water tank Sudhera village √ 3.6 Pucca<br />
Hand pump Lakhwan √ 4.9<br />
Water tank Lakhwan √ 6.1 Pucca<br />
Water tank Lakhwan √ 6.4 Pucca<br />
School Lakhwan √ 18.0 Pucca<br />
Hand pump Sil village √ 4.8<br />
Religious Tree with Platform Gulma √ 7.2 Pucca<br />
Religious Tree with Platform Gulma kotlu √ 7.3 Pucca<br />
water tap Gulma kotlu √ 5.0<br />
water tap Ratti village √ 5.2<br />
Hand pump Ratti village √ 5.0<br />
Water Tank Aghar village √ 7.0 Pucca<br />
Bus Stop Patta village √ 6.2 Pucca<br />
Water Tank Patta village √ 6.2 Pucca<br />
5.990 Well Samoor Kalan √ 10.5 Pucca<br />
5.990 Water Tank + Bath Room Samoor Kalan √ 9.5<br />
Mehatpur - Amb<br />
25.810 Water tank Jaldhara Basal √ 7 Pucca<br />
25.810 Bus Stop Jaldhara Basal √ 4 Pucca<br />
25.820 Water Tap Jaldhara Basal √ 6.6 Pucca<br />
25.820 <strong>Government</strong> Building √ 7 Pucca<br />
27.025 Community Sarai Teuri Panchayat √ 6.2 Kuccha<br />
27.180 Hand pump & Plateform with three bench Panoh Panchayat √ 6.1 Pucca<br />
30.100 Bus Stop Badhuhi √ 5.7 Pucca<br />
32.460 Bus Stop Dussara √ 4.9 Pucca
Chainage Temple/ Shrine/ Church/ Mosque/ Name LHS RHS Dist. from<br />
dargha/ Bus stop/ HP/ Water tap/ school/<br />
C.L.<br />
hospital/ government building<br />
Construction type-<br />
PUCCA/ Semi- Pucca<br />
/Kuccha<br />
39.760 Bus Stop Takarla Panchayat √ 9.8 Pucca<br />
39.760 Bus Stop(platform) Takarla Panchayat √ 9.8 Pucca<br />
39.760 Well Takarla Panchayat √ 16 Pucca<br />
40.170 Banquit Hall Takarla Panchayat √ 9.2 Pucca<br />
41.400 Bus stop Nandpur Panchyat √ 4.8 Pucca<br />
43.800 Well Kuthiari Panchayat √ 6.8 Pucca<br />
44.140 School (Boundry wall) Kuthiari Panchayat √ 5.5 Pucca<br />
44.155 Water tank & water tap Kuthiari Panchayat √ 5.5 Pucca<br />
44.185 Bus stop Kuthiari Panchayat √ 4.9 Pucca<br />
45.100 Banquit Hall Vizapur Panchayat √ 9.8 Pucca<br />
45.105 Well Vizapur Panchayat √ 13.3 Pucca<br />
47.100 Well Kathod Panchayat √ 7.8 Pucca<br />
47.500 Bus Stop Puccapanoh Panchayat √ 7.5 Pucca<br />
5.611 Police Check Post Mehat Pur √ 8.6 Pucca<br />
5.615 Police Check Post Mehat Pur √ 6.4 Pucca<br />
5.905 Police Check Post Mehat Pur √ 6.1 Kuccha<br />
6.360 Forest Check Post Mehat Pur √ 7.2 Pucca<br />
6.360 Bus Stop Mehat Pur √ 8.7 Pucca<br />
7.935 Bus Stop Dehla Panchayat √ 6 Pucca<br />
8.820 Pump House Upper Dehla √ 8.7 Pucca<br />
10.050 Temple Upper Dehla √ 8.5 Pucca<br />
10.700 Water tank Upper Dehla √ 6.3<br />
10.730 Bus Stop Upper Dehla √ 6<br />
12.160 Bus Stop Jalgraon Tabba √ 6.4 Pucca<br />
12.165 Water tank Jalgraon Tabba √ 7.6 Pucca<br />
13.260 Bus Stop Jalgraon Tabba √ 15 Pucca<br />
13.260 Colony Gate & Boundry Wall Jalgraon Tabba √ 16 Pucca
Chainage Temple/ Shrine/ Church/ Mosque/ Name LHS RHS Dist. from<br />
dargha/ Bus stop/ HP/ Water tap/ school/<br />
C.L.<br />
hospital/ government building<br />
Construction type-<br />
PUCCA/ Semi- Pucca<br />
/Kuccha<br />
13.600 Bus Stop Rakkar Colony √ 8.9 Pucca<br />
14.150 Bus stop Rakkar Colony √ 7.3 Pucca<br />
14.400 Electrical Division Office(Boundry Wall) Rakkar Colony √ 8.2 Pucca<br />
16.300 Water tank Malhat Nagar √ 10.5 Pucca<br />
19.220 Cremination ground (boundry wall) Una √ 8.7 Pucca<br />
19.220 Temple Cremination ground Una √ 8.3 Pucca<br />
19.885 co-opreative Society Lal Singhi √ 31 Pucca<br />
20.070 Bus stop Lal Singhi √ 9 Pucca<br />
21.225 Bus stop Lal Singhi √ 8.5 Pucca<br />
21.225 Temple Lal Singhi √ 8.65 Pucca<br />
22.135 Water Tank Jhalera √ 8 Pucca<br />
23.135 Bus Stop Jhalera √ 8 Pucca<br />
Theog - Rohru<br />
1.960 Water Tank √ 7.6 Pucca<br />
3.230 Water Tap √ 7<br />
5.080 Water Tank √ 5.2<br />
5.080 Water Tank √ 5.2 Pucca<br />
9.390 Water Tank √ 11 Pucca<br />
15.185 Water Tank √ 4 Pucca<br />
20.410 Water Tank √ 4.5 Pucca<br />
21.290 Natural Water Source √ 3.5<br />
21.500 Natural Water Source √ 4.8<br />
22.375 Hand Pump √ 5.8<br />
26.470 Hand Pump √ 4.6<br />
26.475 Bus Stop √ 4.7 Pucca<br />
26.515 Temple √ Pucca<br />
26.610 Water Tank √ Pucca
Chainage Temple/ Shrine/ Church/ Mosque/ Name LHS RHS Dist. from<br />
dargha/ Bus stop/ HP/ Water tap/ school/<br />
C.L.<br />
hospital/ government building<br />
Construction type-<br />
PUCCA/ Semi- Pucca<br />
/Kuccha<br />
28.735 Hand Pump √ 7.5<br />
30.040 Water Tank √ Pucca<br />
32.920 Hand Pump √ 6.4<br />
32.980 Water Tap √ 5.3<br />
34.115 Bus Stop √ 3.8 Pucca<br />
35.700 Natural Water Source √ 5.7<br />
38.570 Natural Water Source √ 3<br />
39.880 Natural Water Source √ 6<br />
41.185 Natural Water Source √ 3.5<br />
42.495 Water Tank √ 9.5 Pucca<br />
43.000 <strong>Government</strong> building (Panchayat Ghar) √ 5.4 Pucca<br />
43.340 <strong>Government</strong> Building (P.W.D Store) √ 5.5 Pucca<br />
43.460 Bus Stop Patshal √ 3.5 Pucca<br />
43.575 Hand Pump Patshal √ 4.2<br />
44.410 Temple Patshal √ Pucca<br />
45.560 Hand Pump √ 5<br />
50.995 Hand Pump √ 8.6<br />
51.035 <strong>Government</strong> Building (Forest Office) √ 5.8 Pucca<br />
51.040 <strong>Government</strong> Building (Apple Control Room) √ 4.6 Pucca<br />
51.125 Hand Pump √ 4.3<br />
57.820 Natural Water Source √ 7<br />
59.615 Hand Pump √ 4.5<br />
61.625 Natural Water Source √ 3.9<br />
62.250 Natural Water Source √ 5.2<br />
62.360 Natural Water Source √ 5.3<br />
68.025 Bus Stop √ 5.8 Pucca<br />
68.060 Hand Pump √ 4.5
Chainage Temple/ Shrine/ Church/ Mosque/ Name LHS RHS Dist. from<br />
dargha/ Bus stop/ HP/ Water tap/ school/<br />
C.L.<br />
hospital/ government building<br />
Construction type-<br />
PUCCA/ Semi- Pucca<br />
/Kuccha<br />
68.085 Hand Pump √ 4.6<br />
187.030 Bus Stop √ 2.5 Pucca<br />
189.820 Hand Pump √ 4.5<br />
189.830 Bus Stop √ 5.3 Pucca<br />
193.275 Natural Water Source √ 5.4<br />
197.515 Hand Pump √ 4.8
Annexure - V<br />
Slope protection along the proposed highway Theog – Rohru road<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
1 0.000 0.050 50 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
2 0.060 0.080 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
3 0.080 0.100 20 Gabion Wall<br />
4 0.100 0.140 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
5 0.140 0.160 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
6 0.160 0.270 110 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
7 0.330 0.345 15 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
8 0.365 0.390 25 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
9 0.665 0.710 45 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
10 0.735 0.745 10 Gabion Wall at Top<br />
11 0.770 0.830 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
12 0.830 0.845 15 Gabion Wall<br />
13 0.870 0.890 20 Gabion Wall<br />
14 0.910 1.030 120 Gabion Wall<br />
15 1.030 1.110 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
16 1.130 1.145 15 Gabion Wall<br />
17 1.145 1.190 45 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
18 1.250 1.290 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
19 1.350 1.390 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
20 1.410 1.425 15 Gabion Wall at Top<br />
21 1.425 1.550 125 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
22 1.590 1.670 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
23 1.790 1.810 20 Gabion Wall<br />
24 1.810 1.850 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
25 1.890 1.970 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
26 2.410 2.450 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
27 3.490 3.510 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
28 3.570 3.590 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
29 5.050 5.110 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
30 5.130 5.150 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
31 5.250 5.270 20 Gabion Wall<br />
32 5.290 5.310 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
33 5.630 5.670 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
34 5.690 5.710 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
35 5.990 6.070 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
36 6.090 6.110 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
37 6.170 6.250 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
38 6.270 6.290 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
39 6.490 6.530 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
40 6.610 6.650 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
41 6.690 6.770 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
42 7.010 7.070 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
43 7.210 7.270 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
44 7.490 7.510 20 Gabion Wall<br />
45 7.570 7.650 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
1
Annexure - V<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
46 7.770 7.790 20 Gabion Wall<br />
47 7.830 7.930 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
48 7.950 8.010 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
49 8.030 8.050 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
50 8.070 8.110 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
51 8.230 8.250 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
52 8.310 8.410 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
53 8.410 8.550 140 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
54 8.550 8.590 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
55 8.750 8.770 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
56 8.810 8.850 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
57 8.910 9.030 120 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
58 9.090 9.130 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
59 9.150 9.330 180 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
60 9.510 9.570 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
61 9.810 9.870 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
62 9.990 10.030 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
63 10.310 10.330 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
64 10.430 10.490 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
65 10.570 10.590 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
66 10.730 10.750 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
67 11.070 11.090 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
68 11.110 11.130 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
69 11.330 11.400 70 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
70 11.420 11.470 50 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
71 11.980 12.000 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
72 12.030 12.070 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
73 12.160 12.340 180 Gabion Wall<br />
74 12.960 12.970 10 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
75 13.280 13.320 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
76 13.410 13.440 30 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
77 13.500 13.540 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
78 13.855 13.900 45 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
79 14.450 14.480 30 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
80 14.510 14.550 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
81 14.844 14.990 146 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
82 15.010 15.110 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
83 15.230 15.250 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
84 15.270 15.290 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
85 15.310 15.350 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
86 15.490 15.650 160 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
87 15.710 15.750 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
88 15.790 15.850 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
89 15.890 15.910 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
90 15.930 15.950 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
91 16.030 16.130 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
92 16.570 16.290 -280 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
2
Annexure - V<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
93 16.510 16.550 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
94 16.870 16.890 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
95 16.910 17.050 140 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
96 17.090 17.190 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
97 17.210 17.230 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
98 17.250 17.270 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
99 17.430 17.470 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
100 17.690 17.710 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
101 17.730 17.810 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
102 17.830 17.930 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
103 18.090 18.150 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
104 18.170 18.190 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
105 18.250 18.270 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
106 18.390 18.430 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
107 18.470 18.530 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
108 18.550 18.570 20 Gabion Wall<br />
109 18.650 18.710 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
110 18.710 18.730 20 Gabion Wall<br />
111 18.790 18.830 40 Gabion Wall<br />
112 18.830 18.870 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
113 18.870 18.890 20 Gabion Wall<br />
114 18.910 18.950 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
115 19.070 19.110 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
116 19.190 19.210 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
117 19.630 19.650 20 Gabion Wall at Top<br />
118 19.650 19.670 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
119 19.710 19.770 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
120 19.890 19.930 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
121 20.030 20.070 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
122 20.090 20.110 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
123 20.250 20.290 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
124 20.430 20.470 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
125 20.510 20.570 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
126 20.670 20.710 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
127 20.710 20.730 20 Gabion Wall at Top<br />
128 20.790 20.830 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
129 20.910 20.930 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
130 20.970 21.030 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
131 21.050 21.070 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
132 21.130 21.160 30 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
133 21.270 21.330 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
134 21.370 21.530 160 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
135 21.570 21.590 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
136 21.650 21.670 20 Gabion Wall<br />
137 21.790 21.810 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
138 21.830 21.890 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
139 21.950 21.990 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
3
Annexure - V<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
140 22.010 22.030 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
141 22.190 22.230 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
142 22.290 22.310 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
143 22.350 22.410 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
144 22.430 22.530 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
145 22.590 22.610 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
146 22.630 22.790 160 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
147 22.790 22.810 20 Gabion Wall<br />
148 22.810 22.830 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
149 22.870 22.930 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
150 23.190 23.230 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
151 23.270 23.290 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
152 23.310 23.390 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
153 23.390 23.430 40 Gabion Wall<br />
154 23.430 23.450 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
155 23.450 23.510 60 Gabion Wall<br />
156 23.510 23.630 120 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
157 23.710 23.750 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
158 23.770 23.790 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
159 23.910 23.950 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
160 24.110 24.130 20 Gabion Wall<br />
161 24.130 24.170 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
162 24.170 24.210 40 Gabion Wall<br />
163 24.490 24.530 40 Gabion Wall<br />
164 24.550 24.570 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
165 24.570 24.650 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
166 24.650 24.670 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
167 24.690 24.810 120 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
168 24.910 24.950 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
169 24.990 25.030 40 Gabion Wall<br />
170 25.030 25.050 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
171 25.170 25.230 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
172 25.350 25.410 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
173 25.430 25.450 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
174 25.770 25.810 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
175 25.830 26.130 300 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
176 26.250 26.270 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
177 26.350 26.510 160 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
178 26.630 26.650 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
179 26.670 26.750 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
180 26.750 26.810 60 Gabion Wall<br />
181 26.810 26.890 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
182 26.950 26.970 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
183 26.990 27.010 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
184 27.050 27.070 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
185 27.130 27.150 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
186 27.170 27.210 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
4
Annexure - V<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
187 27.310 27.410 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
188 27.430 27.510 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
189 27.570 27.650 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
190 27.670 27.690 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
191 27.750 27.790 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
192 27.830 27.910 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
193 28.150 28.190 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
194 28.210 28.230 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
195 28.250 28.330 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
196 28.430 28.490 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
197 28.550 28.590 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
198 28.910 28.930 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
199 28.950 28.970 20 Gabion Wall<br />
200 28.970 28.990 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
201 29.130 29.150 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
202 29.910 29.930 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
203 29.990 30.010 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
204 30.030 30.050 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
205 30.110 30.130 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
206 30.350 30.410 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
207 30.450 30.540 90 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
208 30.540 30.590 50 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
209 30.690 30.710 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
210 30.740 30.790 50 Gabion Wall at Top<br />
211 30.910 30.930 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
212 31.350 31.410 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
213 31.450 31.510 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
214 31.750 31.810 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
215 31.850 31.890 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
216 31.930 32.010 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
217 32.070 32.130 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
218 32.510 32.530 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
219 32.790 32.810 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
220 33.030 33.050 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
221 33.170 33.190 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
222 33.230 33.250 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
223 33.310 33.330 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
224 33.470 33.490 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
225 33.670 33.750 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
226 33.770 33.790 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
227 33.790 33.810 20 Gabion Wall at Top<br />
228 33.830 33.890 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
229 34.270 34.310 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
230 34.310 34.330 20 Gabion Wall<br />
231 34.430 34.450 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
232 34.510 34.530 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
233 34.550 34.670 120 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
5
Annexure - V<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
234 34.730 34.770 40 Gabion Wall<br />
235 34.970 35.010 40 Gabion Wall<br />
236 35.070 35.090 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
237 36.350 36.430 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
238 36.990 37.030 40 Gabion Wall<br />
239 37.410 37.470 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
240 37.570 37.610 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
241 37.970 38.030 60 Gabion Wall<br />
242 38.070 38.110 40 Gabion Wall<br />
243 38.130 38.210 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
244 38.290 38.330 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
245 38.410 38.490 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
246 38.510 38.670 160 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
247 39.110 39.130 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
248 39.170 39.230 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
249 39.330 39.350 20 Gabion Wall<br />
250 39.510 39.530 20 Gabion Wall<br />
251 39.590 39.610 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
252 39.630 39.650 20 Gabion Wall<br />
253 39.670 39.710 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
254 39.830 39.850 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
255 39.870 39.930 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
256 40.030 40.070 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
257 40.110 40.130 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
258 40.150 40.250 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
259 40.350 40.370 20 Gabion Wall<br />
260 40.390 40.430 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
261 40.430 40.510 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
262 40.510 40.550 40 Gabion Wall<br />
263 40.550 40.650 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
264 40.670 40.710 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
265 40.730 40.790 60<br />
Stone Masonry with cement mortar Retaining<br />
wall<br />
266 40.830 40.910 80<br />
Stone Masonry with cement mortar Retaining<br />
wall<br />
267 40.950 41.040 90 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
268 41.040 41.070 30 Gabion Wall<br />
269 41.070 41.090 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
270 41.130 41.170 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
271 41.190 41.230 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
272 41.270 41.310 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
273 41.330 41.390 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
274 41.390 41.470 80 Gabion Wall<br />
275 41.510 41.590 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
276 41.610 41.910 300 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
277 41.930 41.990 60 Gabion Wall<br />
278 41.990 42.110 120 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
6
Annexure - V<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
279 42.110 42.130 20 Gabion Wall<br />
280 42.130 42.210 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
281 42.250 42.330 80 Gabion Wall<br />
282 42.370 42.530 160 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
283 42.550 42.590 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
284 42.590 42.630 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
285 42.730 42.750 20 Gabion Wall<br />
286 42.790 42.850 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
287 42.890 42.930 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
288 42.950 42.970 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
289 43.030 43.130 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
290 43.150 43.170 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
291 43.270 43.290 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
292 43.310 43.330 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
293 43.370 43.430 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
294 43.510 43.550 40 Gabion Wall<br />
295 43.570 43.630 60<br />
Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
(1.0m at top)<br />
296 43.650 43.690 40 Gabion Wall<br />
297 43.730 43.770 40 Gabion Wall<br />
298 43.770 43.810 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
299 43.810 43.830 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
300 43.950 44.030 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
301 44.070 44.090 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
302 44.110 44.150 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
303 44.170 44.210 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
304 44.230 44.250 20 Gabion Wall<br />
305 44.470 44.510 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
306 44.590 44.630 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
307 44.670 44.710 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
308 44.750 44.770 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
309 44.937 44.997 60 Stone Masonry Revetment + Spot Dowels<br />
310 45.010 45.030 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
311 45.070 45.090 20 Gabion Wall<br />
312 45.090 45.170 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
313 45.190 45.230 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
314 45.230 45.310 80 Gabion Wall<br />
315 45.330 45.350 20 Gabion Wall<br />
316 45.390 45.430 40 Gabion Wall<br />
317 45.530 45.570 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
318 45.570 45.630 60 Gabion Wall<br />
319 45.630 45.650 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
320 45.830 45.850 20 Gabion Wall<br />
321 45.870 45.890 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
322 45.910 45.930 20 Gabion Wall<br />
323 45.930 45.950 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
7
Annexure - V<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
324 45.970 46.010 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
325 46.010 46.030 20 Gabion Wall<br />
326 46.130 46.150 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
327 46.350 46.370 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
328 46.410 46.470 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
329 46.590 46.610 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
330 46.610 46.630 20 Gabion Wall<br />
331 46.710 46.730 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
332 46.810 46.830 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
333 46.910 46.930 20 Gabion Wall<br />
334 47.050 47.090 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
335 47.270 47.310 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
336 47.450 47.470 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
337 47.710 47.770 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
338 47.830 47.850 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
339 48.010 48.030 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
340 48.110 48.130 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
341 48.150 48.290 140 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
342 48.430 48.450 20 Gabion Wall<br />
343 48.570 48.610 40 Gabion Wall<br />
344 48.630 48.670 40 Gabion Wall<br />
345 48.710 48.730 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
346 48.790 48.830 40 Gabion Wall<br />
347 48.970 48.990 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
348 49.030 49.050 20 Gabion Wall<br />
349 49.070 49.090 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
350 49.130 49.210 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
351 49.270 49.290 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
352 49.290 49.310 20 Gabion Wall<br />
353 49.430 49.470 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
354 49.570 49.610 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
355 49.610 49.630 20 Gabion Wall<br />
356 49.630 49.650 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
357 49.850 49.870 20 Gabion Wall<br />
358 49.890 49.930 40 Gabion Wall<br />
359 49.950 49.970 20 Gabion Wall<br />
360 49.970 49.990 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
361 49.990 50.010 20 Gabion Wall<br />
362 50.010 50.030 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
363 50.070 50.110 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
364 50.110 50.130 20 Gabion Wall<br />
365 50.150 50.190 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
366 50.530 50.550 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
367 50.590 50.630 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
368 50.690 50.710 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
369 50.730 50.750 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
370 50.770 50.910 140 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
8
Annexure - V<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
371 51.010 51.150 140 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
372 51.170 51.270 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
373 51.270 51.330 60 Gabion Wall<br />
374 51.370 51.410 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
375 51.410 51.450 40 Gabion Wall<br />
376 51.590 51.610 20 Gabion Wall<br />
377 51.670 51.710 40<br />
Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
(1.0m at top)<br />
378 51.870 51.930 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
379 52.150 52.170 20 Gabion Wall<br />
380 52.170 52.210 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
381 52.250 52.350 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
382 52.570 52.630 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
383 52.630 52.690 60 Gabion Wall<br />
384 52.750 52.770 20 Gabion Wall<br />
385 53.010 53.030 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
386 53.070 53.110 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
387 53.130 53.190 60 Gabion Wall<br />
388 53.190 53.230 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
389 53.350 53.450 100 Gabion Wall<br />
390 53.510 53.590 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
391 53.630 53.650 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
392 53.650 53.670 20 Gabion Wall<br />
393 53.690 53.730 40 Gabion Wall<br />
394 53.810 53.830 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
395 53.910 53.930 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
396 53.970 54.090 120 Gabion Wall<br />
397 54.190 54.230 40 Gabion Wall<br />
398 54.270 54.310 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
399 54.310 54.350 40 Gabion Wall<br />
400 54.350 54.370 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
401 54.450 54.470 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
402 54.730 54.750 20 Gabion Wall<br />
403 54.790 54.830 40 Gabion Wall<br />
404 54.850 54.870 20 Gabion Wall<br />
405 54.890 54.950 60 Gabion Wall<br />
406 55.010 55.090 80 Gabion Wall<br />
407 55.130 55.150 20 Gabion Wall<br />
408 55.150 55.250 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
409 55.250 55.270 20 Gabion Wall<br />
410 55.270 55.370 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
411 55.390 55.410 20 Gabion Wall<br />
412 55.470 55.510 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
413 55.610 55.630 20 Gabion Wall<br />
414 55.630 55.650 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
415 55.650 55.670 20 Gabion Wall<br />
416 55.690 55.730 40 Gabion Wall<br />
9
Annexure - V<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
417 55.730 55.770 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
418 55.770 55.830 60 Gabion Wall<br />
419 55.830 55.870 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
420 55.870 55.890 20 Gabion Wall<br />
421 55.890 55.930 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
422 55.950 56.050 100 Gabion Wall<br />
423 56.050 56.070 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
424 56.150 56.170 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
425 56.170 56.190 20 Gabion Wall<br />
426 56.330 56.370 40 Gabion Wall<br />
427 56.390 56.420 30 Gabion Wall<br />
428 56.720 56.760 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
429 56.970 57.030 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
430 57.090 57.110 20 Gabion Wall<br />
431 57.190 57.210 20 Gabion Wall<br />
432 57.210 57.230 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
433 57.230 57.450 220 Gabion Wall<br />
434 57.470 57.490 20 Gabion Wall<br />
435 57.490 57.510 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
436 57.510 57.550 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
437 57.590 57.630 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
438 57.670 57.690 20 Gabion Wall<br />
439 57.770 57.790 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
440 57.850 57.870 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
441 57.930 58.030 100 Gabion Wall<br />
442 58.090 58.130 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
443 58.310 58.370 60 Gabion Wall<br />
444 58.590 58.630 40 Gabion Wall<br />
445 58.670 58.750 80 Gabion Wall<br />
446 58.750 58.810 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
447 58.810 58.890 80 Gabion Wall<br />
448 58.910 59.010 100 Gabion Wall<br />
449 59.030 59.050 20 Gabion Wall<br />
450 59.210 59.250 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
451 59.270 59.330 60 Gabion Wall<br />
452 59.370 59.410 40 Gabion Wall<br />
453 59.470 59.570 100 Gabion Wall<br />
454 59.570 59.650 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
455 59.650 59.690 40 Gabion Wall<br />
456 59.690 59.730 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
457 59.810 59.830 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
458 59.850 59.890 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
459 59.930 59.990 60 Gabion Wall<br />
460 59.990 60.030 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
461 60.170 60.210 40 Gabion Wall<br />
462 60.230 60.370 140 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
463 60.430 60.490 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
10
Annexure - V<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
464 60.510 60.530 20 Gabion Wall at Top<br />
465 60.530 60.550 20 Gabion Wall<br />
466 60.550 60.570 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
467 60.590 60.610 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
468 60.870 60.970 100 Gabion Wall<br />
469 60.990 61.030 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
470 61.070 61.130 60 Gabion Wall<br />
471 61.210 61.230 20 Gabion Wall<br />
472 61.290 61.330 40 Gabion Wall<br />
473 61.550 61.630 80 Gabion Wall<br />
474 61.730 61.750 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
475 61.750 61.790 40 Gabion Wall<br />
476 61.790 61.830 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
477 61.880 61.910 30 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
478 62.130 62.150 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
479 62.210 62.270 60 Gabion Wall<br />
480 62.310 62.410 100 Gabion Wall<br />
481 62.490 62.530 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
482 62.570 62.590 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
483 62.690 62.710 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
484 62.730 62.750 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
485 62.770 62.910 140 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
486 63.010 63.030 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
487 63.030 63.050 20 Gabion Wall<br />
488 63.070 63.090 20 Gabion Wall<br />
489 63.130 63.150 20 Gabion Wall<br />
490 63.230 63.250 20 Gabion Wall<br />
491 63.250 63.360 110 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
492 63.450 63.470 20 Gabion Wall<br />
493 63.470 63.490 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
494 63.590 63.640 50 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
495 63.670 63.690 20 Gabion Wall<br />
496 63.790 63.850 60 Gabion Wall<br />
497 64.010 64.030 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
498 64.070 64.150 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
499 64.150 64.210 60 Gabion Wall<br />
500 64.210 64.230 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
501 64.250 64.310 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
502 64.350 64.490 140 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
503 64.530 64.690 160 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
504 64.750 64.770 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
505 64.850 64.890 40 Gabion Wall<br />
506 64.890 65.010 120 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
507 66.765 66.920 155 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
508 68.910 68.920 10 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
509 69.030 69.550 520 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall + Gabion Wall<br />
510 69.550 69.570 20 Gabion Wall at top<br />
11
Annexure - V<br />
S.N. From To Length mt. General Slope Protection Method<br />
511 69.710 69.730 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
512 69.730 69.750 20 Gabion Wall<br />
513 69.770 69.810 40 Gabion Wall<br />
514 69.830 69.890 60 Gabion Wall<br />
515 69.890 69.930 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
516 69.970 70.030 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
517 70.050 70.130 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
518 70.150 70.170 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
519 70.210 70.330 120 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
520 70.490 70.510 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
521 70.510 70.550 40 Gabion Wall<br />
522 70.570 70.650 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
523 70.690 70.750 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
524 70.750 70.910 160 Gabion Wall<br />
525 70.950 71.050 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
526 71.050 71.130 80 Gabion Wall<br />
527 71.210 71.230 20 Gabion Wall<br />
528 71.270 71.390 120 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
529 71.510 71.630 120 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
530 71.650 71.690 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
531 71.690 71.710 20 Gabion Wall<br />
532 71.810 71.910 100 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
533 71.910 71.930 20 Gabion Wall<br />
534 71.971 72.050 79 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
535 72.070 72.110 40 Gabion Wall<br />
536 72.170 72.190 20 Gabion Wall<br />
537 72.190 72.250 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
538 72.310 72.390 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
539 72.410 72.490 80 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
540 72.570 72.610 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
541 72.650 72.670 20 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
542 72.690 72.730 40 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
543 72.850 72.910 60 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
544 72.970 73.000 30 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
545 73.550 73.585 35 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
546 73.850 74.370 520 Stone Masonry Revetment Wall<br />
547 75.637 75.707 70 Gabion Wall<br />
548 76.237 77.327 1090 Gabion Wall (40%)<br />
549 79.727 80.237 510<br />
Stone Masonry with cement mortar Retaining<br />
wall<br />
28450<br />
12
Annexure VI: Summary <strong>of</strong> Consultation<br />
Location and<br />
date<br />
Bhota,<br />
21-9-06<br />
Bani,<br />
22-9-06<br />
Una-Ner chowk<br />
Issues raised Suggestions from participants Mitigation measures<br />
• concern for the width <strong>of</strong><br />
the road& impact on<br />
market<br />
• worried for a negative<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> bypass on their<br />
market<br />
• compensation measures<br />
adopted by project<br />
authorities<br />
• concern for the width <strong>of</strong><br />
the road<br />
• minimise impact on<br />
market<br />
• concerned about<br />
compensation since<br />
people were not paid in<br />
previous occasion<br />
• Not much width available<br />
in the market<br />
• Land owners were not<br />
ready to part with their<br />
land in the market area<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> bypass to<br />
avoid impact on market<br />
• People should be given<br />
sufficient time to vacate if<br />
falls in the project<br />
• Existing centreline be<br />
followed to minimize<br />
impact on structures<br />
• Bypass provided to<br />
avoid market<br />
• Compensation as per<br />
policy<br />
• Concentric widening to<br />
minimise impact<br />
• Sufficient time to APs to<br />
vacate the property<br />
• Compensation as per<br />
policy<br />
Barsar,<br />
22-9-06<br />
• Drainage system is not<br />
proper and there is water<br />
logging in the market<br />
during rainy season<br />
• Concern for their balcony<br />
as these are extended on<br />
the government land<br />
• Concern about amount <strong>of</strong><br />
lands required on the<br />
curves and turns<br />
• Concern about the width<br />
<strong>of</strong> the road and it’s<br />
widening<br />
• Minimal acquisition to<br />
save market from any<br />
impact<br />
• Existing width <strong>of</strong> the road<br />
is around 8 meters that<br />
can be utilized so as to<br />
save the shopkeepers <strong>of</strong><br />
the market<br />
• Concentric widening<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> covered<br />
drain to minimise<br />
impact<br />
• Compensation as per<br />
policy<br />
Ladror,<br />
22-9-06<br />
• There are places where<br />
road is passing through<br />
private land and<br />
government land is on the<br />
other side where people<br />
are currently living.<br />
• Concerned about impact<br />
on structures since land<br />
holding is small<br />
• Concerned about<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> compensation<br />
since in hills lot <strong>of</strong> expenses<br />
incurred in hill cutting<br />
• Improvement <strong>of</strong> curve will<br />
require land acquisition<br />
and will impact a family<br />
who has already lost land<br />
thrice in past for road<br />
development<br />
• Grade at chainage<br />
84.260 – 84.380 is very<br />
steep they were <strong>of</strong> the<br />
view that it should be<br />
improved<br />
• Raise <strong>of</strong> road surface will<br />
impact shops residences<br />
and a bus stop<br />
• Minimisation impact by<br />
following existing<br />
alignment<br />
• Grade improvement<br />
through design solution<br />
• Minimum road pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
raise to avoid impact<br />
1
Annexure VI: Summary <strong>of</strong> Consultation<br />
Location and<br />
date<br />
Kalkhar,<br />
25-9-06<br />
Issues raised Suggestions from participants Mitigation measures<br />
• concerned for the width<br />
<strong>of</strong> the road in built-up<br />
area <strong>of</strong> Kalkhar market<br />
• concern for the religious<br />
tree and a small religious<br />
shrine<br />
• PWD has marked<br />
properties far away from<br />
the existing road, which is<br />
a concern<br />
• Buildings along the roads<br />
should be avoided as far<br />
as possible<br />
• People are ready to give<br />
their verandah and<br />
platform for the road<br />
project.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> Brest - wall<br />
and retaining wall to save<br />
structures<br />
• CoI concept is followed<br />
to minimise impact<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> breast wall<br />
and retaining wall to<br />
protect and minimise<br />
impact on structures<br />
• Protection <strong>of</strong> religious<br />
structure<br />
Dhalwan,<br />
25-9-06<br />
• worried for the<br />
compensation against<br />
acquisition <strong>of</strong> land<br />
• Concerned for the link<br />
road and their access to<br />
the state highway<br />
• Drainage problem in the<br />
area<br />
• Access <strong>of</strong> link should be<br />
restored<br />
• Provision pf drainage to<br />
ease <strong>of</strong>f water logging<br />
• Assistance for restoration<br />
<strong>of</strong> livelihood<br />
• Compensation and<br />
assistance as per the<br />
policy<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> drainage<br />
included<br />
• Restoration <strong>of</strong> access <strong>of</strong><br />
link roads to the SH<br />
• Distribution<br />
compensation in<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> APs and<br />
NGO<br />
Jahu,<br />
26-9-06<br />
• worried for the width <strong>of</strong><br />
the new road and<br />
proposed bridge<br />
• Encroachers worried<br />
about the impact<br />
• Bypass will impact the<br />
market by way <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong><br />
business<br />
• New bridge should be<br />
constructed close to the<br />
existing one<br />
• Impact on properties<br />
should be minimised<br />
• Removal<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
encroachment<br />
• Removal <strong>of</strong> religious tree<br />
on nerchowk side to save<br />
shops<br />
• Bridge location close to<br />
the existing one<br />
• Partial impact on row <strong>of</strong><br />
shops on left side fro<br />
Una end<br />
• Saving <strong>of</strong> shops by<br />
modifying centreline<br />
Galma,<br />
26-9-06<br />
• Concerned about<br />
road width and<br />
impact on structures<br />
• Compensation<br />
related worry<br />
• Hospital close to<br />
road cater nearby<br />
many villages<br />
• No impact on<br />
hospital<br />
• Widening within<br />
available width<br />
• Concentric<br />
widening to avoid<br />
impact<br />
• No impact on<br />
hospital<br />
• Compensation as<br />
per the policy<br />
Village Lower<br />
Arania, 25 –04-<br />
2006<br />
• Concern for loosing<br />
their shops and<br />
livelihood.<br />
• Concerned about the<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> Widening.<br />
• Land not available for<br />
purchase in market<br />
area.<br />
• Realignment<br />
or<br />
smoothening <strong>of</strong> curves will<br />
affect properties.<br />
Therefore, the present<br />
alignment should be<br />
followed.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign boards to<br />
avoid accidents.<br />
• Concentric<br />
widening.<br />
• Compensation as<br />
per R&R policy.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign<br />
boards included in<br />
project<br />
2
Annexure VI: Summary <strong>of</strong> Consultation<br />
Location and<br />
date<br />
Village<br />
Mohmanhir,<br />
Tehsil Bangana,<br />
25 –04-2006<br />
Issues raised Suggestions from participants Mitigation measures<br />
• Concern for extent <strong>of</strong><br />
widening and impact<br />
on livelihood.<br />
• Possibility <strong>of</strong> buying<br />
land in compensation<br />
money is very remote.<br />
• People are <strong>of</strong> the view<br />
that minimum acquisition<br />
to avoid displacement or<br />
impact on shops.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign boards<br />
and reflective signs.<br />
• Department should use<br />
the available land instead<br />
acquiring additional land.<br />
• Concentric widening<br />
to minimise impact.<br />
• Payment <strong>of</strong><br />
compensation as<br />
per R&R policy.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign<br />
board included in<br />
project.<br />
Village Thane<br />
Kala, Tehsil<br />
Bangana, 25 –<br />
04-2006<br />
• Worried about lose <strong>of</strong><br />
property.<br />
• Concerned about the<br />
width <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />
• Drainage problem.<br />
• Water logging<br />
problem.<br />
• Available RoW should<br />
be used for widening.<br />
• Road designed to<br />
avoid maximum<br />
impact.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong><br />
drainage made for<br />
water discharge and<br />
addressing water<br />
logging problem<br />
Bamballu<br />
School, Village<br />
Panchyat<br />
Klohen, 27 –04-<br />
2006<br />
• Concerned about the<br />
width <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />
• Bad experience with<br />
earlier land acquisition<br />
and concern for<br />
compensation for land<br />
acquisition this time<br />
• Incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
accidents<br />
• Access road<br />
connected to state<br />
highway should be<br />
restored.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> bus stand,<br />
public urinals, toilets<br />
and streetlights.<br />
• Co-ordination<br />
between various<br />
departments such as<br />
electricity, telephone,<br />
water supply to avoid<br />
inconvenience and<br />
damages to the road.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign<br />
boards and reflective<br />
signs to prevent<br />
accidents.<br />
• Widening done<br />
keeping in mind the<br />
minimum impact on<br />
property.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> access<br />
road restoration<br />
included<br />
• Provision made for<br />
sign board and<br />
reflective sign<br />
• Compensation shall<br />
be paid as per the<br />
R&R policy.<br />
Village<br />
Panchyat<br />
Dhundla, 27 –<br />
04-2006<br />
• Drainage problem<br />
• Concern for<br />
compensation for lost<br />
property<br />
• Compensation at<br />
market rate.<br />
• People are ready to<br />
part with their land to<br />
have a good road.<br />
• Compensation will<br />
be paid in a fair<br />
manner as per<br />
policy.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> drainage<br />
included in the<br />
project.<br />
• Road designed for<br />
15-20 years life span<br />
3
Annexure VI: Summary <strong>of</strong> Consultation<br />
Location and<br />
date<br />
Village<br />
Panchyat<br />
Mushali, 27 –04-<br />
2006<br />
Issues raised Suggestions from participants Mitigation measures<br />
• Worried about the<br />
width <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />
• Concern for loss <strong>of</strong><br />
shops and livelihood.<br />
• Bad geometry <strong>of</strong><br />
existing road & high risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> accidents.<br />
• “S” curve in the<br />
market area is<br />
dangerous.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> bus stop on<br />
the either side <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road.<br />
• Sign boards and<br />
zebra crossings at the<br />
school<br />
• Improved geometry<br />
keeping in view the<br />
impacts.<br />
• Compensation and<br />
assistance for<br />
livelihood as per<br />
policy.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign<br />
board and zebra<br />
crossing included in<br />
the project<br />
Village<br />
Panchyat<br />
Lathayani, 28 –<br />
04-2006<br />
• Concerned about the<br />
width <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />
• There are around 125<br />
shops in the market<br />
along the highway in<br />
this village.<br />
• Encroachments in<br />
RoW.<br />
• Fair compensation for<br />
the loss <strong>of</strong> properties.<br />
• Poor road geometry<br />
before & after market<br />
place is unsafe and<br />
accident prone<br />
• Problem <strong>of</strong> traffic<br />
jams<br />
• Improvement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
existing road and<br />
widened wherever it’s<br />
narrow.<br />
• Regular bus stop to<br />
prevent irregular<br />
stoppage <strong>of</strong> vehicles<br />
for passengers’<br />
embarkation and<br />
disembarkation.<br />
• Road should pass<br />
through market,<br />
change <strong>of</strong> alignment<br />
will disturb their<br />
livelihood.<br />
• Compensation at<br />
market rate for loss <strong>of</strong><br />
property<br />
• Concentric<br />
widening to<br />
minimise impact<br />
• Encroachment<br />
within CoI shall be<br />
removed after<br />
giving advance<br />
notice<br />
• Compensation as<br />
per R&R policy<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> bus<br />
stop included in<br />
the project<br />
Village Market<br />
Saloni, 20 and<br />
28 –04-2006<br />
• Concern about the<br />
width <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />
• Shopkeepers were<br />
concerned losing their<br />
shops and livelihood.<br />
• Curve on the existing<br />
road is sharp and there<br />
is high risk <strong>of</strong> accidents.<br />
• Minimisation <strong>of</strong> loss.<br />
• Safety <strong>of</strong> school<br />
children<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> zebra<br />
crossing and speed<br />
breaker near the<br />
school<br />
• The design should be<br />
such that losses are<br />
minimised.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> bus stop<br />
on the either side <strong>of</strong><br />
the road.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign<br />
boards for school and<br />
settlement area.<br />
• Improved road<br />
geometry with<br />
minimum impact<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> zebra<br />
crossing, rumble strip<br />
at school<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> bus stop<br />
is made<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign<br />
boards included in<br />
the project<br />
Theog – Rohru Road<br />
Bhvin Village,<br />
03-04-2006<br />
• Bad road condition.<br />
• Minimal impact on<br />
livelihood and on<br />
structures.<br />
• Concern related to<br />
widening option.<br />
• Concern related to<br />
impact on apple<br />
orchards along the<br />
roadside.<br />
• Breast wall and retaining<br />
wall should be provided.<br />
• Drainage should be<br />
provided<br />
• Fair compensation for lost<br />
property<br />
• Good construction quality<br />
to avoid frequent<br />
maintenance.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> Breast wall<br />
and retaining wall at<br />
appropriate locations to<br />
prevent slide and<br />
impact on structure<br />
• The consultant informed<br />
the people that good<br />
road building practices<br />
will be adopted.<br />
• Provision<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
4
Annexure VI: Summary <strong>of</strong> Consultation<br />
Location and<br />
date<br />
Khadapattar,<br />
Jubal, Gram<br />
Panchyat<br />
Parali, 04-04-<br />
2006<br />
Jubbal Road,<br />
05-04-2006<br />
Gumma<br />
Panchyat<br />
Issues raised Suggestions from participants Mitigation measures<br />
• Worries related to the<br />
compensation.<br />
• Concern for livelihood<br />
and change <strong>of</strong><br />
occupation.<br />
• Non payment <strong>of</strong><br />
compensation by PWD<br />
for acquisition in past.<br />
• Mismatch in land<br />
records and actual road<br />
alignment.<br />
• Construction <strong>of</strong><br />
footpath and drainage<br />
along the road.<br />
• Better road for<br />
connectivity.<br />
• Bad road condition<br />
affecting transporting <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural produce<br />
• Restoration <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
Water Sources<br />
• Loss <strong>of</strong> land and apple<br />
orchards along the<br />
road.<br />
• Worried about cracks or<br />
weakening <strong>of</strong> strength<br />
<strong>of</strong> structures due to<br />
construction activity<br />
• Concern related to<br />
widening option.<br />
• Worries related to the<br />
compensation.<br />
• Bad road condition.<br />
• Two lane road for better<br />
access<br />
• Minimal impact on their<br />
shops as it’s the sole<br />
means <strong>of</strong> livelihood<br />
• Concern related to<br />
proposed width <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road.<br />
• The shop owners are<br />
paying rent to the<br />
panchyat<br />
• Concern related to<br />
widening.<br />
• Good road can save<br />
travel time and make<br />
places accessible.<br />
• Breast wall and<br />
retaining wall should be<br />
provided.<br />
• continuous drainage<br />
should be provided<br />
along the road<br />
• Good construction<br />
quality to avoid<br />
frequent maintenance.<br />
• Land for land would be<br />
a<br />
preferred<br />
compensation option<br />
for the people.<br />
• Loss <strong>of</strong> structure should<br />
be compensated on<br />
the current market<br />
price.<br />
• concerned committee<br />
should be consulted for<br />
religious structure<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> rain shelter,<br />
with toilet facility.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> controlled<br />
blasting to avoid the<br />
impact on structures<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> public<br />
parking place for<br />
vehicles.<br />
• Road should be<br />
constructed for better<br />
communication to the<br />
area.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> shops along<br />
the road on rent basis<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> speed<br />
breakers at the school<br />
compensation as per<br />
entitlement policy<br />
• Updating <strong>of</strong> PWD RoW<br />
records and marking on<br />
site<br />
• Measures will be taken<br />
to avoid impact on land<br />
and structures<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> proper<br />
drainage to discharge<br />
the water at<br />
appropriate location.<br />
• Natural water sources<br />
are preserved through<br />
EMP<br />
• Best construction<br />
practice shall be<br />
followed to avoid<br />
impact on structures<br />
such as cracks and<br />
weakening <strong>of</strong> strength<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> Breast wall<br />
and retaining wall at<br />
appropriate locations<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> parking, rain<br />
shelter, toilet facility<br />
incorporated in the<br />
project.<br />
• Provision<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
compensation as per<br />
entitlement policy<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> two lane<br />
road and better quality<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> support for<br />
livelihood as per<br />
entitlement policy<br />
• Proper drainage<br />
facility<br />
to<br />
5
Annexure VI: Summary <strong>of</strong> Consultation<br />
Location and<br />
date<br />
Bhawnan , 05-<br />
04-2006<br />
Issues raised Suggestions from participants Mitigation measures<br />
• Concern for the<br />
compensation.<br />
• No proper drainage<br />
along the road.<br />
• Need for two-lane<br />
road.<br />
• Minimum impact on<br />
their livelihood and<br />
structures.<br />
• Concern for the<br />
school children’s<br />
safety.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> public<br />
parking facility.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> rain<br />
shelter with toilet<br />
facilities for male and<br />
female<br />
location.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> cross<br />
drainage so that road is<br />
not damaged during<br />
the rainy season.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> footpath on<br />
both the sides <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road for the safety <strong>of</strong><br />
the pedestrians.<br />
discharge the<br />
water<br />
at<br />
appropriate<br />
location.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong><br />
parking, rain<br />
shelter.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong><br />
compensation as<br />
per entitlement<br />
policy<br />
• CoI approach<br />
adopted to<br />
minimise the<br />
impact<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong><br />
signboards and<br />
rumble strip at<br />
school location<br />
Kotkhai Truck<br />
Operator, 05-<br />
04-2006<br />
Bagh, 05-04-<br />
2006<br />
• Poor construction<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />
• Lack <strong>of</strong> emergency<br />
services and rescue<br />
operations.<br />
• Concern for the blind<br />
curves on the road.<br />
• Concern regarding<br />
steep and high<br />
grades on existing<br />
road.<br />
• Lack proper drainage<br />
damaging road in<br />
rainy season.<br />
• Increase<br />
in<br />
maintenance <strong>of</strong> their<br />
vehicles due to bad<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> road.<br />
• Disturbance to<br />
connecting road to<br />
the adjoining villages.<br />
• Road is in bad<br />
condition for travel<br />
and takes lot <strong>of</strong> time<br />
to reach Shimla<br />
• Present cutting under<br />
CRF fund has done lot<br />
<strong>of</strong> damage<br />
• Lack proper drainage<br />
• Releasing <strong>of</strong> drain<br />
water to the<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> cross<br />
drainage along the<br />
highway<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> ambulance<br />
and crane for<br />
emergency services at<br />
every 20 km apart.<br />
• Good contractor should<br />
be recruited for<br />
construction.<br />
• Construction <strong>of</strong><br />
retaining wall and Brest<br />
wall along the corridor<br />
to prevent land slide<br />
and damage to<br />
properties.<br />
• Road needs to be built<br />
properly to avoid<br />
frequent maintenance<br />
• Drainage along the<br />
road<br />
• Linking longitudinal<br />
drain to natural water<br />
course<br />
• Informal<br />
communication links<br />
• Incorporation <strong>of</strong><br />
drainage.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> Brest<br />
wall and retaining<br />
in the design to<br />
minimise the<br />
impact<br />
• ICB/NCB process<br />
followed to select<br />
contractors<br />
• Improvement in<br />
road geometry<br />
through design<br />
• Improvement in<br />
road gradient<br />
through design<br />
• Guidance support<br />
for<br />
local<br />
NGO/organisation<br />
to procure fund<br />
from maintaining<br />
emergency<br />
services<br />
• Provision for<br />
restoration <strong>of</strong> link<br />
roads<br />
• Incorporation <strong>of</strong><br />
drainage.<br />
• Connecting<br />
longitudinal<br />
drainage to<br />
natural course.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> Brest<br />
wall to minimize<br />
the impact<br />
• Good construction<br />
6
Annexure VI: Summary <strong>of</strong> Consultation<br />
Location and<br />
date<br />
Dochi, 05-04-<br />
2006<br />
Hatkoti chowk,<br />
06-04-2006<br />
Chella , 07-04-<br />
2006<br />
Issues raised Suggestions from participants Mitigation measures<br />
agriculture field and<br />
damaging the crop<br />
and land.<br />
• Unplanned cutting in<br />
the area has<br />
damaged lot <strong>of</strong> land<br />
and increases the<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> land slide.<br />
• Concern related to<br />
proposed width <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road<br />
• Disposal <strong>of</strong> derbies<br />
• Concern related to<br />
proposed width <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road.<br />
• Poor construction<br />
quality.<br />
• Concerned regarding<br />
the encroachment<br />
along the corridor.<br />
• No impact on religious<br />
shrine<br />
• Minimal impact on<br />
livelihood and<br />
structures.<br />
• Worried for the<br />
compensation price.<br />
• Parking problems<br />
• Concern related to<br />
proposed width <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road.<br />
• Bad construction<br />
quality.<br />
• Minimal impact on their<br />
livelihood<br />
and<br />
structures.<br />
• Concern related to the<br />
compensation price.<br />
• Concern related to<br />
environmental<br />
degradation<br />
• Safety issues during<br />
construction<br />
• Concerned about<br />
proposed width <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road.<br />
• Increase in incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> accidents in the<br />
area.<br />
• Minimal impact on<br />
should be restored<br />
• Good contractor should<br />
be recruited<br />
• Cutting and<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> Brest<br />
wall should go hand in<br />
hand<br />
• Derbies dispose at<br />
isolated location.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> safety in<br />
settlement area<br />
• Good construction<br />
quality.<br />
• Parking places along the<br />
highway wherever there<br />
is public land.<br />
• Removal<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
encroachment along<br />
the corridor.<br />
• Removal <strong>of</strong><br />
encroachment.<br />
• Road safety should be<br />
considered while<br />
designing the road<br />
• <strong>Project</strong> should have<br />
negligible impact on<br />
their land and<br />
livelihood.<br />
• Accommodating<br />
encroachers along the<br />
market area restoring<br />
their livelihood<br />
• Good quality road should<br />
be constructed.<br />
• The road should follow the<br />
existing arrangement to<br />
avoid impact on temple<br />
• <strong>Government</strong> land<br />
available for the public<br />
practice shall be<br />
followed during<br />
the construction<br />
• Disposal <strong>of</strong> debris is<br />
being taken care<br />
in EMP<br />
• Provision made to<br />
restore informal<br />
communication<br />
links<br />
• Good construction<br />
practice followed<br />
and contractor will<br />
be selected through<br />
ICB/NCB criteria<br />
• Avoidance <strong>of</strong><br />
religious structure<br />
• Corridor <strong>of</strong> Impact<br />
approach followed<br />
to minimise the<br />
impact<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> parking<br />
made according to<br />
the need<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong><br />
compensation as<br />
per entitlement<br />
policy<br />
• <strong>Project</strong> designed<br />
life for 15-20 years<br />
• CoI concept<br />
adopted to<br />
minimise the<br />
impact<br />
• Compensation<br />
and assistance as<br />
per policy<br />
• Environmental<br />
impact assessment<br />
and management<br />
plan to minimise<br />
environmental<br />
degradation<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> safety<br />
requirements<br />
during<br />
construction<br />
• Compensation<br />
and assistance as<br />
per policy<br />
• No impact on the<br />
temple<br />
• Compensation<br />
and assistance as<br />
7
Annexure VI: Summary <strong>of</strong> Consultation<br />
Location and<br />
date<br />
Jhelra Chowk<br />
and Rehsini<br />
Panchyat, 12-<br />
04-2006<br />
Upper Basal<br />
Panchayat, 12-<br />
04-2006<br />
Doshara<br />
Village/ Radha<br />
Sawami<br />
Satsang<br />
Center, 12 –04-<br />
2006<br />
Panchayat<br />
Bhawan,<br />
Village Churdu,<br />
19 –04-2006<br />
Issues raised Suggestions from participants Mitigation measures<br />
their livelihood and<br />
on structures.<br />
• Worried for the<br />
compensation price.<br />
• No impact on the<br />
temple<br />
• Lack <strong>of</strong> vehicle<br />
parking space<br />
• No provision <strong>of</strong><br />
waiting room, toilet<br />
facility for the<br />
passengers<br />
• Need for proper<br />
drainage<br />
Mehatpur-Amb<br />
• Bad construction<br />
quality & frequent<br />
maintenance<br />
• Junction is an<br />
accident-prone area<br />
• Area faces drainage<br />
& water logging<br />
problem.<br />
• Concern related to<br />
proposed width <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road<br />
• Concern related to<br />
impact on the<br />
properties along the<br />
road<br />
• Queries for<br />
compensation for loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> property<br />
• Problem <strong>of</strong> water<br />
logging in rainy season<br />
• Lack <strong>of</strong> proper<br />
drainage provision<br />
• Concern related to<br />
Impact on shops at<br />
Upper Basal market<br />
• Concern for loss <strong>of</strong><br />
livelihood<br />
• No provision <strong>of</strong> a<br />
proper bus stand and<br />
public toilets and<br />
urinals<br />
• Pat <strong>of</strong> satsang<br />
(religious cult) area<br />
impacted due to<br />
new alignment.<br />
• Concerned about the<br />
proposed width <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road.<br />
• Concerned about<br />
toilets, waiting room and<br />
bus stop and market<br />
committee is ready to<br />
maintain the same.<br />
• Safety provision to<br />
prevent accident.<br />
• Govt. should use vacant<br />
land to built shops ad give<br />
on rent<br />
• The electric transformer<br />
at junction should be<br />
removed<br />
• Continuous drainage in<br />
the market area and that<br />
should be connected to<br />
the natural drainage<br />
which is about 500mt from<br />
the end point <strong>of</strong> market<br />
on Amb side.<br />
• Road should be built<br />
within available R0W<br />
• Minimum impact on<br />
market<br />
• Compensation at<br />
market rate.<br />
• Follow the existing<br />
alignment to avoid<br />
impact.<br />
• Shop keepers have no<br />
space available behind<br />
the existing shops.<br />
• Land available on the unacquired<br />
side should be<br />
used for relocation.<br />
• Requested to minimise<br />
impact<br />
through<br />
appropriate design<br />
measures.<br />
• Design should be such<br />
that their losses are<br />
minimised.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> bus stop.<br />
per policy<br />
• CoI concept<br />
adopted to<br />
minimise the<br />
impact<br />
• NGO will assess the<br />
feasibility <strong>of</strong> Public<br />
facilities<br />
Designated<br />
parking area<br />
included<br />
• Proper drainage<br />
provided in<br />
project<br />
• Road designed for a<br />
life <strong>of</strong> 15 to 20 years.<br />
• Junction<br />
improvement to make<br />
safe.<br />
• Drainage included<br />
addressing water<br />
logging issue.<br />
• Covered drainage<br />
introduced to minimise<br />
impact.<br />
• Compensation as per<br />
R&R policy<br />
• Drainage provided for<br />
water logging problem.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> bus stop<br />
included.<br />
• Rehabilitation &<br />
resettlement as per R&R<br />
policy.<br />
• Impact on satsang area<br />
avoided<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign<br />
board and zebra<br />
crossing included<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> rain<br />
8
Annexure VI: Summary <strong>of</strong> Consultation<br />
Location and<br />
date<br />
Panchayat<br />
Bhawan,<br />
Village<br />
Lalsinghi, 19 –<br />
04-2006<br />
Hotel Maya,<br />
Near bus<br />
Stand(Una), 19<br />
–04-2006<br />
Office <strong>of</strong><br />
Municipal<br />
Corporation,<br />
Mehetpur, 06 –<br />
05-2006<br />
Issues raised Suggestions from participants Mitigation measures<br />
impact on shops and<br />
livelihood.<br />
• The proposed new<br />
alignment will divide<br />
the land in two parcel<br />
• Concern for<br />
compensation<br />
• Safety <strong>of</strong> school<br />
children<br />
• Drainage problem.<br />
• Concern for width <strong>of</strong><br />
the road.<br />
• Concerned about the<br />
impact on the<br />
property<br />
• Worried for loss <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural land and<br />
shops along the<br />
highway.<br />
• Bad quality<br />
construction and<br />
frequent<br />
maintenance.<br />
• Problem <strong>of</strong> drainage<br />
in the town since lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> drainage leads to<br />
stagnation <strong>of</strong> water.<br />
• From Rotary chowk for<br />
about 250 mt. towards<br />
Amb the ROW is very<br />
narrow and the<br />
section is heavily built<br />
up. Widening would<br />
cause lot <strong>of</strong> damage<br />
to the property.<br />
• Concern about the<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> widening.<br />
• Rising <strong>of</strong> road pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
will lead to water<br />
entering the shops.<br />
• Lack <strong>of</strong> public<br />
facilities such as<br />
public urinals and<br />
toilets<br />
• RoW available is<br />
between 21-22 meters,<br />
widening beyond RoW<br />
would affect entire<br />
market<br />
• Communication <strong>of</strong><br />
proposed road<br />
widening plan to all<br />
local bodies and line<br />
dept.<br />
• Drainage problem<br />
and water logging in<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong>f sign boards<br />
installed and a zebra<br />
crossing at school.<br />
• Adequate compensation<br />
• Present road is narrow<br />
needs widening.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> speed breaker<br />
and sign board<br />
• Avoid impact on property<br />
• Existing road should not<br />
be raised, as the market<br />
and road presently at the<br />
same height.<br />
• Continuous drainage in<br />
the market area and that<br />
should be connected to<br />
the main city drain.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> traffic lights<br />
on both <strong>of</strong> the ends <strong>of</strong> the<br />
market.<br />
• Co-ordination with<br />
various departments to<br />
avoid damage the road<br />
after construction<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> retro<br />
reflective signs, street<br />
lights installed in the<br />
municipal area.<br />
• Provisions <strong>of</strong> underneath<br />
space on either side after<br />
shoulder for future laying<br />
<strong>of</strong> pipes or other utilities<br />
without disturbing the<br />
road.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> street lights<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign boards<br />
• Removal <strong>of</strong><br />
encroachment<br />
• Co-ordination with<br />
various dept. to avoid<br />
inconvenience & loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> public money<br />
• Lack <strong>of</strong> co-ordination<br />
among various dept.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> a bus<br />
stand.<br />
shelter made on<br />
either side <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road<br />
• Effort made to<br />
minimise the impact<br />
through engineering<br />
solution<br />
• Compensation as<br />
per R&R policy<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> drainage<br />
included in project<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign board<br />
and rumble strip<br />
included<br />
• Effort to reduce the<br />
impact<br />
• Proper drainage<br />
provision to avoid<br />
water drain issue<br />
• Property to<br />
property concept<br />
used at Rotary<br />
chowk and<br />
beyond to avoid<br />
impact<br />
• Minimum raising<br />
the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road<br />
• Other<br />
departments<br />
communicated<br />
about the<br />
proposed road<br />
project to avoid<br />
conflicting<br />
scenario<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign<br />
board.<br />
• Compensation &<br />
resettlement as<br />
per R&R policy.<br />
• Concentric widening<br />
• Property to property<br />
concept followed<br />
for road widening<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> sign<br />
board and reflective<br />
sign included<br />
• Information<br />
regarding project<br />
communicated to<br />
all concerned<br />
departments for<br />
9
Annexure VI: Summary <strong>of</strong> Consultation<br />
Location and<br />
date<br />
Mehetpur,<br />
06/05/2006<br />
Issues raised Suggestions from participants Mitigation measures<br />
rainy season.<br />
• Safety concern with<br />
the increase in speed<br />
• Concern related to the<br />
proposed width <strong>of</strong> the<br />
road and its impact on<br />
shops and Gurudwara<br />
gate.<br />
• Water logging is a<br />
problem due to absence<br />
<strong>of</strong> drainage<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> water<br />
tanks and public<br />
urinals and toilets.<br />
• Gurudwara committee<br />
suggested avoiding<br />
religious structure.<br />
• Available RoW should be<br />
used for widening.<br />
better co-ordination<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> bus<br />
stop included<br />
• Impact avoided on<br />
religious gate.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> drainage to<br />
solve water logging<br />
issue.<br />
Jhelra, police<br />
colony temple<br />
20/06/2006<br />
• Temple is not<br />
encroachment on the<br />
government land.<br />
• Temple constructed with<br />
contribution from police<br />
personnel.<br />
• Regarding the religious<br />
tree, temple committee<br />
agreed for its removal.<br />
• The religious structure<br />
should be saved.<br />
• Provision <strong>of</strong> a hall in lieu <strong>of</strong><br />
loss <strong>of</strong> temple land.<br />
• Temple has been<br />
protected<br />
10
Annexure VII : INDIVIDUAL GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORM<br />
Case No.:<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the applicant:<br />
Date:<br />
Address:<br />
ID No. (if any)/ Khasara no.:<br />
Date and time <strong>of</strong> GRC/DLC/Arbitrator meeting:<br />
Name and Signature <strong>of</strong> NGO representative:<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> grievances:<br />
Comments <strong>of</strong> NGO on the grievance:<br />
Decision <strong>of</strong> GRC/DLC/Arbitration committee:<br />
Signature <strong>of</strong> the Committee members:<br />
Decision acceptable/ not acceptable to the party (if acceptable signature):<br />
Case referred to GRC/DLC/Arbitration:
Annexure VIII<br />
1. <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India Sponsored Schemes<br />
1.1. Indira Awas Yojna: Indira Awas Yojna is a centrally sponsored housing<br />
scheme. The criterion <strong>of</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries is similar as under Gandhi Kutir<br />
Yojna. The scheme is being funded by the central and state government on<br />
75:25 sharing basis. As per the revised guidelines <strong>of</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India, an<br />
assistance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 22000/- will be provided for conversion/ up-gradation <strong>of</strong> Kutcha<br />
house into semi Pucca/ Pucca house.<br />
1.2. Integrated Wastelands Development <strong>Project</strong>s: The integrated wastelands<br />
development projects are being implemented in district Kangra, Chamba,<br />
Solan, Sirmour and Mandi. These projects are being financed by the <strong>Government</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> India on 100% basis. IWDP's are also being implemented on watershed<br />
development basis. Therefore, the objectives as envisaged under DPAP are<br />
common under IWDP also. The projects are being executed through DRDAs/ PIAs<br />
and Watershed Development Committees.<br />
1.3. Desert Development Programme: This programme is being implemented in<br />
district Lahaul & Spiti and Pooh sub division <strong>of</strong> Kinnaur district as a 100% centrally<br />
sponsored programme. Under this programme total 80 watersheds have been<br />
identified to be developed within a period <strong>of</strong> four years. DDP is also being<br />
implemented on watershed basis. Therefore, the objectives as envisaged under<br />
DPAP are common under DDP also. The programme is being implemented<br />
through DRDAs/ PTAs and Watershed Development Committees.<br />
1.4. Drought Prone Areas Programme (DPAP): This programme is basically an area<br />
development programme and is being in 9 blocks <strong>of</strong> the State. Under this<br />
programme, 54 watersheds have been taken up for development over a period<br />
<strong>of</strong> 4 years. The centre and State are funding the schemes on 50:50 sharing basis.<br />
This programme is engaged in promoting the economic development <strong>of</strong> the<br />
village community directly or indirectly dependent on the watershed. The<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> the programme is to mitigate the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> draught,<br />
restoration <strong>of</strong> ecological balance and to generate employment. The<br />
programme is being implemented through DRDAs and watershed development<br />
committees.<br />
1.5. Employment Assurance Scheme: This employment generation scheme is<br />
being implemented in all the development blocks <strong>of</strong> the State. The centre and<br />
State are funding the scheme on 75:25 sharing basis. The main objective <strong>of</strong> this<br />
programme is to provide 100 days <strong>of</strong> assured casual manual labour employment<br />
during lean agriculture season at statutory minimum wages linked to the normal<br />
output <strong>of</strong> 8 hours <strong>of</strong> work and creation <strong>of</strong> economic infrastructure and<br />
community assets in the rural areas. The scheme is being implemented through<br />
DRDAs and Panchyats.<br />
1
Annexure VIII<br />
1.6. National Social Assistance Programme: Old age pension @ Rs. 100/- per<br />
month per destitute person above 65 years <strong>of</strong> age belonging to target group<br />
families is being provided. Financial assistance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10.000/- is being provided to<br />
the family in case <strong>of</strong> death <strong>of</strong> a bread earner in the family living below the<br />
poverty line. A lump-sum financial assistance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 500/- is being given to a<br />
pregnant women above the age <strong>of</strong> 19 years belonging to target group family<br />
(BPL family) up to two live births.<br />
1.7. Jwahar Gram Samridhi Yojna: Jwahar Gram Samridhi Yojna is a new<br />
programme replacing Jwahar Rozgar Yojna, which has been launched by the<br />
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India from the current financial year. The Jwahar Gram Samridhi<br />
Yojna is being financed between centre and state on 75:25 sharing basis. The<br />
central government will release funds directly to DRDAs on the prescribed criteria<br />
<strong>of</strong> poverty and population <strong>of</strong> SC / ST in the state. The objective <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme is creation <strong>of</strong> durable assets / infrastructure at the village level,<br />
creation <strong>of</strong> productive assets exclusively for SC / ST for sustained employment<br />
and generation <strong>of</strong> supplementary employment to the un-employed poor living<br />
below poverty line.<br />
1.8. Swaranjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana: The <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India by<br />
restructuring the self employment programmes has merged IRDP, TRYSEM,<br />
DWCRA, SITRA, GKY and MWS into a new scheme namely "Swaranjayanti Gram<br />
Swarozgar Yojna" which has been launched from the current financial year. This<br />
yojna is a holistic package covering all aspect <strong>of</strong> self employment such as<br />
organisation <strong>of</strong> poor into self help groups, training, credit, technology,<br />
infrastructure and marketing. The centre and state governments are funding the<br />
yojna on 75:25 sharing basis.<br />
Target Group and Objective: The scheme aims at covering 30% <strong>of</strong> below poverty<br />
line (BPL) families in each block during next five years i.e., 1999-2000 to 2003-2004.<br />
The objective <strong>of</strong> SGSY is to bring the assisted poor families above the poverty line<br />
with in 3 years, by providing them income generating assets through a mix <strong>of</strong><br />
bank credit and government subsidy. The scheme envisages that the monthly<br />
income <strong>of</strong> a assisted family increases to at least Rs. 2000/- monthly. SGYS aims at<br />
establishing a large number <strong>of</strong> micro enterprises in the rural areas, organisation <strong>of</strong><br />
rural poor into self help groups and their capacity building, planning <strong>of</strong> activity<br />
clusters, infrastructure build up, technology, credit and marketing. The assisted<br />
families under this scheme will be individuals or groups (SHGs)<br />
Subsidy: Subsidy under SGSY will be uniform at 30% <strong>of</strong> the project cost subject to<br />
a maximum limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 7500/-. In respect <strong>of</strong> SC / ST, however, these will be 50%<br />
subject to a maximum limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10,000/-. For groups <strong>of</strong> swarozgaris (SHGs), the<br />
subsidy would be at 50% <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> schemes, subject to a maximum <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />
1.25 lacs.<br />
2
Annexure VIII<br />
Safeguards: SGSY will particularly focus on the vulnerable groups among the rural<br />
poor. Accordingly, the SC / ST will account for the 50% <strong>of</strong> swarozgaris, women for<br />
40% and the disabled for 3%.<br />
Implementation <strong>of</strong> the Yojna: SGSY will be implemented by the DRDAs through<br />
the panchyat samitis. The process <strong>of</strong> planning, implementation and monitoring<br />
would integrate the blanks and other financial institutions, the PRIs, NGOs, as well<br />
as technical institutions in the districts.<br />
Expanded SGSY Differential Capital Subsidy: According to the norms <strong>of</strong> the<br />
government <strong>of</strong> India, under SGSY a subsidy <strong>of</strong> Rs. 7500/- is admissible for non SC /<br />
ST individual families whereas this limit for SC / ST families is Rs. 10,000/-. However<br />
the state government is providing uniform subsidy to non SC / ST families also and<br />
difference <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2500/- in subsidy is being met out <strong>of</strong> the funds provided under<br />
expanded SGSY programme.<br />
Expanded SGSY Differential Interest Subsidy: Similarly, as per government <strong>of</strong><br />
India's norms, BPL families are entitled to avail loan @12.50% interest per annum<br />
whereas the State <strong>Government</strong> has decided to give loan to all IRD families @4%<br />
interest per annum. The difference in interest rate is being met out <strong>of</strong> the funds<br />
provided by the State <strong>Government</strong> under expanded SGSY programme.<br />
Families Identified Below Poverty Line for 9th Five Year Plan: As per the instructions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the government <strong>of</strong> India, the state government has conducted a fresh<br />
household survey for the 9th Five Year Plan which has been made applicable<br />
w.e.f. 1st April, 1999. The families having monthly per capita consumption<br />
expenditure up to Rs. 289.31 have been identified below the poverty line. The<br />
district wise number <strong>of</strong> families identified for 9th five year plan is given in table 1.<br />
Table 1: BPL families in the district as per 9 th five year plan<br />
S.NO. District No. <strong>of</strong> Rural<br />
Households<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Rural Families Below Poverty<br />
Line<br />
%age<br />
families BPL<br />
Total SC ST Women<br />
1 Bilaspur 65532 17448 6649 505 2222 26.62<br />
2 Chamba 76418 47165 9863 13650 6328 61.72<br />
3 Hamirpur 83505 20179 7826 0 3902 24.16<br />
4 Kangra 265740 63972 21432 37 10421 24.07<br />
5 Kinnaur 10899 2896 1326 1570 334 26.57<br />
6 Kullu 59227 11432 5335 197 1630 19.30<br />
7 L & Spiti 6446 2445 197 2248 542 37.93<br />
8 Mandi 169863 42012 18469 422 5254 24.73<br />
9 Shimla 94316 21755 14839 152 4686 33.67<br />
10 Sirmour 58618 13418 6416 272 1569 22.89<br />
11 Solan 65418 17951 9155 52 2461 27.44<br />
12 Una 81014 15439 5550 0 2401 19.02<br />
Total 1036996 286112 107057 19105 41850 27.59<br />
3
Annexure VIII<br />
The district wise IR activities identified under SGSY are given in table 2.<br />
Table 2: Details <strong>of</strong> District wise identified activities under SGSY<br />
Sl. Name <strong>of</strong> the district<br />
Key activities<br />
no.<br />
1 Bilaspur 1. Dairy Farming<br />
2. Mushroom Farming<br />
3. Sericulture Farming<br />
4. Vegetable Growing<br />
5. Floriculture<br />
6. Knitting Work<br />
7. Carpentry work<br />
8. Handloom work<br />
9. Shoe making<br />
2 Hamirpur 1. Sericulture<br />
2. Vegetable Growing<br />
3. Dairy Farming<br />
4. Shops<br />
5. Shuttering<br />
6. Handloom Weaving<br />
7. Sheep, goat, Poultry Farming<br />
8. Pack Animals<br />
9. Mules<br />
10. Potteries<br />
3 Mandi 1. Dairy<br />
2. Vegetable Growing<br />
3. Carpet Weaving<br />
4. Shuttering<br />
5. Sericulture and Flower Growing<br />
6. Khadi<br />
7. Floriculture<br />
4 Shimla 1. Dairy<br />
2. Sheep Rearing<br />
3. Vegetable Growing<br />
4. Prickle and Chutteny making<br />
5. Cartons Making<br />
6. Weaving<br />
7. Knitting<br />
8. Bamboo Crafts<br />
5 Una 1. Dairy Farming<br />
2. Goat rearing<br />
3. Ban Units<br />
4. Knitting<br />
5. Vermi- Compost manufacturing<br />
4
Annexure VIII<br />
2. <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> <strong>Government</strong> Plan Schemes<br />
2.1. Chief Minister"S Gratuity Scheme: Under this scheme, the <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> is providing an assistance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10,000/- to a bereaved below<br />
poverty line family in case <strong>of</strong> death <strong>of</strong> any family member in the age group <strong>of</strong> 18<br />
to 60 years.<br />
2.2. Rural Housing: Under State rural housing scheme "Gandhi Kutir Yojna"<br />
assistance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 16,300/- per beneficiary is being provided to the eligible families<br />
for the construction <strong>of</strong> residential houses. Following criteria has been laid down<br />
for the selection <strong>of</strong> eligible families living below the poverty line:<br />
1. Priority will be given to the totally houseless families and divorced women.<br />
2. Second priority will be given to the families who have lost their houses in<br />
fire, floods or any other natural calamities.<br />
3. Third priority would be given to such families whose houses are fully<br />
damaged and are not safe for living.<br />
4. The families living in slums and sheds etc.<br />
5. Those families who don't have adequate living space for family members.<br />
2.3. Rural Sanitation: Under this programme, financial assistance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1700/- and<br />
Rs. 2000/- is being provided to the beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the general category and<br />
schedule cast / schedule tribe/ below poverty line beneficiaries respectively, for<br />
the construction <strong>of</strong> rural latrines. Under restructured CRSP, a subsidy <strong>of</strong> Rs. 500/- is<br />
being given to a beneficiary for the construction <strong>of</strong> sanitary latrine.<br />
2.4. Social Audit Scheme: Under Social Audit Scheme launched by the State<br />
<strong>Government</strong>, the vigilance committees <strong>of</strong> the gram sabhas constituted under<br />
the section 7(4) <strong>of</strong> H.P. Panchyati Raj Act, 1994 have been empowered to<br />
exercise supervision over schemes/ works costing up to Rs. 50,000/- being<br />
executed by the gram panchyats. The junior engineers <strong>of</strong> the block shall not be<br />
required to fill the Measurement Books <strong>of</strong> such works under this scheme.<br />
2.5. Mahila Mandal Protsahan Yojna: Presently under this programme grants are<br />
provided for the promotion/ strengthening <strong>of</strong> Mahila Mandals, incentive awards<br />
to Mahila Mandals and organisation <strong>of</strong> skill/ awareness camps for non <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />
etc. With the objective <strong>of</strong> encouraging Mahila Mandals towards involvement in<br />
development programmes, the department has introduced a new scheme titled<br />
"Mahila Mandal Protsahan Yojna" from 1998-1999 which aims at creating<br />
awareness <strong>of</strong> various developmental programmes among the people through<br />
the Mahila Mandals and encourage their involvement in developments<br />
programmes. Besides it aims at generating awareness among the rural women in<br />
family planning and child care, promotion <strong>of</strong> small savings, participation in<br />
literacy/ post literacy campaign and educates them about the social evils like<br />
5
Annexure VIII<br />
drinking, dowry and crimes against women. The funds under this scheme would<br />
be given to only registered Mahila Mandals and on the basis <strong>of</strong> their<br />
performance in various developmental activities. The incentive money<br />
sanctioned under this scheme will be utilised for creating <strong>of</strong> community assets,<br />
purchse <strong>of</strong> utensils, daries, furniture, musical instruments, organisation <strong>of</strong> cultural<br />
activities/ awareness camps and conducting <strong>of</strong> study tours within the State.<br />
6
Annexure - IX<br />
Sample Terms <strong>of</strong> Reference For<br />
EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF RP IMPLEMENTATION<br />
1. Background <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Project</strong><br />
The <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> India has requested the assistance <strong>of</strong> the World Bank for the<br />
improvement and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> State Highways, Major District Roads and Other District<br />
Roads in the State <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong>. A Strategic Option Study (SOS), carried out for the<br />
Public Works Department (PWD), has prioritised road sections for improvement from the<br />
1675 km <strong>of</strong> State Highways (SH) and Major District Roads (MDR). The major criteria used for<br />
selection in SOS, are traffic volume, restricted carriageway width, pavement conditions,<br />
economic activity in the influence area <strong>of</strong> the road, volume <strong>of</strong> commercial traffic and<br />
interconnectivity <strong>of</strong> the roads.<br />
The improvement works will consist mainly in raising the formation level,<br />
upgrading/improvement <strong>of</strong> road geometrics, widening to two-lane/intermediate-lane<br />
from the existing, intermediate-lane or single-lane width, and pavement strengthening,<br />
improving the cross drainage. Road stretches crossing urban areas may also require<br />
upgrading to a two-lane cross section, and/or provision for drains, sidewalks and parking<br />
where required. In some cases, new alignments (by-passes) and/or re-alignments may<br />
also be required.<br />
The <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> (GOHP) through the <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> Road<br />
Infrastructure Development Corporation (HPRIDC) will be the executing agency for the<br />
project and establishment and infrastructure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> Public Works<br />
Department (HPPWD) shall be utilized by the HPRIDC for implementation. GOHP has<br />
engaged a highly qualified and experienced consultant to assist the HPRIDC in all aspects<br />
<strong>of</strong> project preparation and implementation.<br />
The <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> has pre-selected approximately 443 km <strong>of</strong> roads for<br />
Phase-I. The project preparation will be undertaken in two Phases:<br />
Phase 1 (<strong>Project</strong> Preparation) is to provide the information and assessments necessary for<br />
World Bank appraisal <strong>of</strong> the proposed <strong>Project</strong>, including feasibility study and screening <strong>of</strong><br />
the 1675 km <strong>of</strong> prioritized roads to finalise about 800km for inclusion in the project,<br />
preliminary design and environmental and social assessment and then final design <strong>of</strong><br />
about 50 percent <strong>of</strong> identified project roads (413 km for upgrading/improvement),<br />
economic analysis and development <strong>of</strong> proposals for selected institutional measures to be<br />
undertaken under the <strong>Project</strong>.<br />
Phase II (<strong>Project</strong> Implementation) is including final design <strong>of</strong> the remaining roads to be<br />
included in the <strong>Project</strong>, and assistance with project implementation, co-ordination, and<br />
strengthening <strong>of</strong> engineering skills.<br />
1
Annexure - IX<br />
The scope <strong>of</strong> this service is limited to three corridors consisting <strong>of</strong> 234.9 kilometer <strong>of</strong> Phase 1<br />
Package 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>Himachal</strong> <strong>Pradesh</strong> State Road <strong>Project</strong>. The corridors to be covered for the<br />
evaluation purpose are given in table 1.<br />
Sr. No. Name <strong>of</strong> Road<br />
Table 1: Roads covered under RAP report<br />
length (in km)<br />
1 Mehatpur Una Mubarikpur Daulatpur H.P. boundary Road 45.200<br />
2 Una Aghar Barsar Jahu Bhambla Mandi-upto Ner Chowk road 109.00<br />
3 Theog Kothkhai Hatkoti Rohroo 80.730<br />
Total 234.93<br />
2. Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Project</strong> Impacts<br />
3. External Evaluation<br />
Objectives<br />
Broad objectives <strong>of</strong> monitoring include the following:<br />
a) To provide project management with an effective tool for assessing ‘Resettlement and<br />
Rehabilitation Plan ‘ implementation at various stages and to identify problem areas<br />
and recommend remedial measures for efficient implementation <strong>of</strong> the policy.<br />
b) To assess the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> ‘income restoration’ and other rehabilitation measures for<br />
affected households/communities.<br />
Evaluation Targets and Functions<br />
The evaluation targets and functions will include the following:<br />
• Review the existing baseline and data gather additional socio-economic baseline<br />
data, if necessary, on sample families which are entitled to receive compensation for<br />
all <strong>of</strong> their lost assets or for resettlement and rehabilitation;<br />
• Evaluate implementation <strong>of</strong> the compensation policy and public information<br />
campaign;<br />
• Identify and discrepancy between the policy requirements and actual practice, as<br />
well as any local level grievances;<br />
• Provide recommendations for improving implementation <strong>of</strong> policy.<br />
Methodology<br />
Evaluation methodology will consist <strong>of</strong> the following:<br />
a. Random review <strong>of</strong> acquisition and compensation documents to ensure full<br />
compliance with policy’s requirements. This review should sample about 30% <strong>of</strong> all<br />
project’s entitlements.<br />
2
Annexure - IX<br />
b. Random site visits, where land acquisition processes are taking place, to ascertain that<br />
compensation has been duly paid prior to the start up <strong>of</strong> construction works under the<br />
projects; compensation is assessed based on the principle <strong>of</strong> replacement cost and<br />
grievances, if any, are solved. This activity should cover at least 20% <strong>of</strong> all concerned<br />
families each year. For these purposes monitoring will include the following aspects:<br />
- Inventory <strong>of</strong> affected assets;<br />
- Assessment <strong>of</strong> compensation for all types <strong>of</strong> affected assets based on replacement<br />
cost;<br />
- Compensation is paid prior to initiation <strong>of</strong> works.<br />
c. special studies aimed to ascertain adequacy <strong>of</strong> compensation paid for land<br />
acquisition and/or other fixed assets, against current market prices.<br />
d. Field visits and survey, to ascertain that affected people are adequately informed <strong>of</strong><br />
project objectives, impacts, compensation policy and entitlements through an<br />
effective public information campaign. This activity should cover at least 30% <strong>of</strong> all the<br />
PAFs.<br />
e. To assess if grievance procedures are adequately explained to the affected people<br />
and implemented. This activity should cover at least 30% <strong>of</strong> all the project affected<br />
families.<br />
Sample<br />
To verify the quantitative aspects <strong>of</strong> implementation, sample surveys <strong>of</strong> various types <strong>of</strong><br />
impacts should be conducted. A stratified sale as specified should cover target groups for<br />
each category, such as land-owners, affected house owners, tenants or workers. While<br />
making quantitative assessments <strong>of</strong> land acquisition activities all the provinces should be<br />
covered.<br />
Data Collection Methods<br />
Data and information will be gathered through:<br />
• Questionnaires, to be personally administered.<br />
• Direct interviews with affected households<br />
• Specific focus group interviews aimed at identifying the specific problem issues related<br />
to groups such as self-employed persons with businesses, farmers and workers affected<br />
by loss <strong>of</strong> job, tenants affected by loss <strong>of</strong> place <strong>of</strong> residence, men heads <strong>of</strong><br />
households, etc.<br />
• Community meetings to discuss problem issues and identify solutions<br />
• <strong>Project</strong> staff in the field<br />
Data Analysis<br />
Data and information collected will be analyzed by project, affected area, resettlement<br />
sites, levels <strong>of</strong> compensation, type <strong>of</strong> impact, etc.<br />
3
Annexure - IX<br />
Data Base Storage<br />
The Evaluation Team will maintain a data base <strong>of</strong> their survey. It will contain details on<br />
each affected household and will be updated based on information collected in<br />
successive rounds <strong>of</strong> data collection. All data bases compiled will be fully accessible to<br />
the project authorities.<br />
Evaluation Indicators<br />
The following aspects <strong>of</strong> the resettlement policy will be monitored and evaluated regularly<br />
by the MA:<br />
a) Payment <strong>of</strong> Compensation<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
(iii)<br />
(iv)<br />
Whether assessment <strong>of</strong> compensation for all types <strong>of</strong> affected assets, especially for<br />
affected land, is based on the current market values;<br />
The compensation for affected structures should be equivalent to the replacement<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> materials and labor based on standards and special features <strong>of</strong><br />
construction, and no deductions made for depreciation or value <strong>of</strong> salvageable<br />
materials;<br />
Full payments to be made to all affected persons sufficiently before land<br />
acquisition<br />
Payment <strong>of</strong> all the allowances to APs prior to the start up <strong>of</strong> civil works and their<br />
shifting to the new sites, where applicable<br />
b) Linkage to Resettlement and Construction<br />
(i)<br />
The completion <strong>of</strong> land acquisition and resettlement activities on a phase, section<br />
or sub-section <strong>of</strong> the project at least one month before the start <strong>of</strong> physical works<br />
on that phase, section or sub-section.<br />
c) Provision <strong>of</strong> Resettlement Site<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
Affected people who are entitled to land-for-land option and for relocation to a<br />
resettlement site and who opt for relocation to a resettlement site, should be<br />
consulted about the location <strong>of</strong> the site;<br />
Site location, site design, infrastructure, and plot allocation should enable affected<br />
people to restore living standards;<br />
d) Provision <strong>of</strong> Training, Employment and Availability <strong>of</strong> Credit Assistance<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
(iii)<br />
(iv)<br />
Training should be provided for one member <strong>of</strong> each eligible affected family who<br />
will be relocated, if the family chooses to opt for training;<br />
The kind <strong>of</strong> training will depend on the preference <strong>of</strong> the affected person and the<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> a training course;<br />
The option <strong>of</strong> post-training credit assistance should be provided to affected persons<br />
on the basis <strong>of</strong> low interest rates, and credit eligibility for otherwise ineligible groups<br />
such as women and low-income earners;<br />
Training should be provided within three months <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> relocation;<br />
4
Annexure - IX<br />
(v)<br />
Job placement to entitled persons should be provided within 2 months <strong>of</strong> the date<br />
<strong>of</strong> land acquisition<br />
e) Public Consultation<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
Affected persons should be informed and consulted about resettlement activities,<br />
such as implementation schedule for the project and shifting <strong>of</strong> APs from their<br />
present location, resettlement site design, location and plot allocation;<br />
The monitoring team should attend at least one public consultation meeting each<br />
month to monitor public consultation procedures, problems and issues that arise<br />
during the meetings, and solutions that are proposed<br />
f) Level <strong>of</strong> Satisfaction<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
The level <strong>of</strong> satisfaction <strong>of</strong> affected persons with various aspects <strong>of</strong> the RAP should<br />
be monitored and recorded;<br />
The operation <strong>of</strong> the mechanisms <strong>of</strong> grievance redress and the speed <strong>of</strong> redress <strong>of</strong><br />
grievances should be monitored.<br />
g) Standard <strong>of</strong> Living<br />
(i)<br />
Throughout the implementation process, the trends <strong>of</strong> living standards should be<br />
observed and the potential problems in the restoration <strong>of</strong> living standards should be<br />
identified and reported<br />
h) Awareness <strong>of</strong> Compensation Policy<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
Public awareness <strong>of</strong> the compensation policy and their entitlements among the APs<br />
will be assessed;<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> various options available to APs as provided for in the<br />
policy for land acquisition, compensation and resettlement.<br />
The following outputs are expected from the assignment:<br />
a. A brief methodological inception report submitted to the <strong>Project</strong> Manager and a copy<br />
to the project authorities within one month <strong>of</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> the assignment.<br />
REPORTING REQUIREMENT<br />
Reports:<br />
The External Evaluation Agency shall prepare and submit the Client six copies <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong><br />
the following reports:<br />
- Inception report: to be submitted 30 days after work begins; the report shall contain a<br />
brief methodological inception and schedule for the completion <strong>of</strong> the work described<br />
herein with the attention to use all outcomes <strong>of</strong> available reports.<br />
- Mid term report: at the end <strong>of</strong> halfway through RAP implementation briefing the works<br />
on-going or accomplished in the RAP implementation, Identification <strong>of</strong> problem, issues<br />
and recommended solutions, so that PIU-HPRIDC is informed about the ongoing<br />
situation, and can resolve problems in a timely manner. Also the report should bring out<br />
the issues need intervention from higher authority, in RAP implementation process, if<br />
any.<br />
5
Annexure - IX<br />
- Final report: Evaluation agency shall prepare a comprehensive report summarizing all<br />
activities carried out under RAP implementation with all facts and figures and criticall<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> project out come with respect to improvement in standard <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong><br />
affected families.<br />
6