10.11.2014 Views

IN SOLIDARITY - OPSEU

IN SOLIDARITY - OPSEU

IN SOLIDARITY - OPSEU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Health Hazard Alert<br />

Asbestos at Mimico Correctional Centre<br />

In Solidarity<br />

In mid-January, Mimico Correctional<br />

Centre sent out letters to 34 former employees, most<br />

of whom worked in Maintenance or who had done<br />

ICIT training at the jail, advising them that asbestos<br />

had been found in the facility. The letter lists a<br />

number of locations where asbestos has been<br />

identified and goes on to say that<br />

existing legislation requires the<br />

employer to notify employees who<br />

“worked on or in the identified<br />

areas…” The letter also states that<br />

there “are currently no indicators<br />

to suggest that staff have been<br />

‘exposed’ to friable material.”<br />

What’s missing from the<br />

employer’s letter?<br />

♦<br />

♦<br />

♦<br />

♦<br />

The employer does not say that it was aware of<br />

the presence of asbestos at Mimico since at least<br />

1993 and apparently chose not to warn workers<br />

or to take measures to reduce the risks of<br />

exposure between 1993 and 2004.<br />

The employer does not say that it had a copy of a<br />

comprehensive asbestos investigation done in<br />

March 2003 and chose to do nothing with that<br />

report either.<br />

The employer does not say how it developed the<br />

list of employees to be notified.<br />

The employer does not say which workers may<br />

have had the greatest chance of exposure.<br />

Why are workers just finding out about<br />

possible asbestos exposures now?<br />

♦ It is not at all clear what happened between 1993<br />

and now. The Ministry of Labour has a copy of at<br />

least one field visit report in 1993 when a small<br />

asbestos removal job was completed at Mimico.<br />

The Ministry of Labour reports that they came to<br />

the site to observe the asbestos removal and<br />

made no orders at that time. They state that they<br />

have no other asbestos reports from Mimico until<br />

2003. The employer denies having any asbestos<br />

reports prior to 2003; in particular the employer<br />

says it has no asbestos documentation from 1993.<br />

♦ In the fall of 2004, <strong>OPSEU</strong> Joint Health<br />

and Safety Committee members<br />

discovered the 2003 asbestos report<br />

which led them to demand an<br />

explanation from the employer and<br />

to eventually call in the Ministry of<br />

Labour for assistance to ensure that<br />

the employer was taking<br />

appropriate action.<br />

What does the 2003 asbestos investigation<br />

report show?<br />

♦<br />

♦<br />

In a nutshell, the report shows that there is a lot<br />

of asbestos throughout the facility, much of it<br />

exposed and much of it in poor to fair condition.<br />

The report documents 58 sites where asbestos<br />

was found, most of it in the form of insulation to<br />

pipes and to pipe fittings.<br />

Asbestos was considered to be in “good”<br />

condition in just 40 per cent of the locations.<br />

“Good” condition means that the asbestos is<br />

completely wrapped and there are no signs that<br />

the wrapping has been penetrated down to the<br />

asbestos. In this condition, asbestos fibres should<br />

not crumble off and be released into the air.<br />

(Continued on page 17)<br />

In Solidarity 16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!