IN SOLIDARITY - OPSEU
IN SOLIDARITY - OPSEU
IN SOLIDARITY - OPSEU
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Health Hazard Alert<br />
Asbestos at Mimico Correctional Centre<br />
In Solidarity<br />
In mid-January, Mimico Correctional<br />
Centre sent out letters to 34 former employees, most<br />
of whom worked in Maintenance or who had done<br />
ICIT training at the jail, advising them that asbestos<br />
had been found in the facility. The letter lists a<br />
number of locations where asbestos has been<br />
identified and goes on to say that<br />
existing legislation requires the<br />
employer to notify employees who<br />
“worked on or in the identified<br />
areas…” The letter also states that<br />
there “are currently no indicators<br />
to suggest that staff have been<br />
‘exposed’ to friable material.”<br />
What’s missing from the<br />
employer’s letter?<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
The employer does not say that it was aware of<br />
the presence of asbestos at Mimico since at least<br />
1993 and apparently chose not to warn workers<br />
or to take measures to reduce the risks of<br />
exposure between 1993 and 2004.<br />
The employer does not say that it had a copy of a<br />
comprehensive asbestos investigation done in<br />
March 2003 and chose to do nothing with that<br />
report either.<br />
The employer does not say how it developed the<br />
list of employees to be notified.<br />
The employer does not say which workers may<br />
have had the greatest chance of exposure.<br />
Why are workers just finding out about<br />
possible asbestos exposures now?<br />
♦ It is not at all clear what happened between 1993<br />
and now. The Ministry of Labour has a copy of at<br />
least one field visit report in 1993 when a small<br />
asbestos removal job was completed at Mimico.<br />
The Ministry of Labour reports that they came to<br />
the site to observe the asbestos removal and<br />
made no orders at that time. They state that they<br />
have no other asbestos reports from Mimico until<br />
2003. The employer denies having any asbestos<br />
reports prior to 2003; in particular the employer<br />
says it has no asbestos documentation from 1993.<br />
♦ In the fall of 2004, <strong>OPSEU</strong> Joint Health<br />
and Safety Committee members<br />
discovered the 2003 asbestos report<br />
which led them to demand an<br />
explanation from the employer and<br />
to eventually call in the Ministry of<br />
Labour for assistance to ensure that<br />
the employer was taking<br />
appropriate action.<br />
What does the 2003 asbestos investigation<br />
report show?<br />
♦<br />
♦<br />
In a nutshell, the report shows that there is a lot<br />
of asbestos throughout the facility, much of it<br />
exposed and much of it in poor to fair condition.<br />
The report documents 58 sites where asbestos<br />
was found, most of it in the form of insulation to<br />
pipes and to pipe fittings.<br />
Asbestos was considered to be in “good”<br />
condition in just 40 per cent of the locations.<br />
“Good” condition means that the asbestos is<br />
completely wrapped and there are no signs that<br />
the wrapping has been penetrated down to the<br />
asbestos. In this condition, asbestos fibres should<br />
not crumble off and be released into the air.<br />
(Continued on page 17)<br />
In Solidarity 16