11.11.2014 Views

2004 Summer Meeting - Amsterdam - The Pathological Society of ...

2004 Summer Meeting - Amsterdam - The Pathological Society of ...

2004 Summer Meeting - Amsterdam - The Pathological Society of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

117<br />

Expression <strong>of</strong> hTERT in gastrointestinal stromal tumours<br />

occurs preferentially in malignant neoplasms<br />

M Sabah , R Cummins , M Leader , E Kay<br />

Royal College <strong>of</strong> Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 9, Ireland<br />

Background: Telomerase is expressed in many human cancers and cell lines<br />

and is thought to contribute to their immortality. To date, little is known about<br />

the expression <strong>of</strong> telomerase in non-epithelial tumours. <strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this<br />

study was to evaluate the expression <strong>of</strong> human telomerase reverse transcriptase<br />

(hTERT) in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).<br />

Methods: Twenty three GISTs (9 low malignant potential, 10 primary<br />

malignant and 4 intra-abdominal recurrences) were evaluated for hTERT<br />

expression using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray. Tissue blocks<br />

were retrieved and H&E stains were performed to evaluate the histologic<br />

tumour type. All cases were strongly positive for KIT (CD117).<br />

Immunohistochemistry for hTERT was performed.<br />

Results: Eighty nine percent (8/9) <strong>of</strong> the low malignant potential group were<br />

negative for hTERT immunoexpression whereas all malignant GISTs showed<br />

positive staining which varied from weak to strong immunoreactivity. 60%<br />

(6/10) <strong>of</strong> the primary malignant GISTs were strongly positive. <strong>The</strong> remaining<br />

40% (4/10) showed weak staining. All recurrent GISTs (4/4) exhibited strong<br />

positive immunostaining for hTERT.<br />

Conclusions: Telomerase expression occurs during the progression <strong>of</strong> GISTs<br />

and immunohistochemical staining for hTERT may be a useful marker for the<br />

prognostication <strong>of</strong> GISTs<br />

118<br />

Metastatic Lymph Node Deposits Originating From A<br />

Different Primary To That Of <strong>The</strong> Resection Specimen<br />

R Swamy , H M Kamel<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Histopathology, Royal Infirmary, 51, Little France<br />

Crescent, Edinburgh, United Kingdom<br />

We describe an unusual finding in a resection specimen for colonic carcinoma.<br />

<strong>The</strong> primary tumour in the resection specimen was a moderately differentiated<br />

adenocarcinoma <strong>of</strong> the sigmoid colon. Ten out <strong>of</strong> sixteen lymph nodes<br />

retrieved from the specimen including the apical lymph node showed metastatic<br />

adenocarcinoma with a morphological pattern different to that <strong>of</strong> the primary<br />

cancer. A close examination <strong>of</strong> the colonic cancer showed no evidence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

similar phenotype in any part <strong>of</strong> the tumour. <strong>The</strong> morphology <strong>of</strong> a micro-acinar<br />

architecture raised the suspicion <strong>of</strong> metastases from a primary prostatic<br />

adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed which showed positive<br />

staining for PSA and negative staining for CK20 and CEA markers, confirming<br />

our suspicion.<br />

This case highlights the importance <strong>of</strong> proper histological comparison and<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> any variations in the phenotypes between the primary tumour and<br />

their metastases in the draining lymph nodes. While tumour de-differentiation<br />

in nodal metastases is common, unusual variations in tumour phenotype must<br />

be diligently recorded since this can have significant implications on patient<br />

management, staging and prognosis. It can also lead to identification <strong>of</strong> new<br />

pathology or another primary as in this case.<br />

119<br />

Chromosomal Changes in Colorectal Adenomas: Specific<br />

Relation to Gene Mutation and Clinical Utility in Screening<br />

A Leslie , A Stewart , DU Baty , NR Pratt , RJC Steele , FA<br />

Carey<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom<br />

We have previously shown that the model <strong>of</strong> colorectal carcinogenesis<br />

involving sequential changes in the APC, K-ras and p53 genes is not supported<br />

by the mutational pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> cancers (PNAS 2002; 99:9433). We have also<br />

demonstrated specific associations between gene mutations and chromosomal<br />

abnormalities (eg p53 with 20q+, 18q-, 13q+, K-ras with 12p+. Cancer Res<br />

2003; 63:4656).<br />

We have now analysed APC, K-ras and p53 mutations and chromosomal<br />

change by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) in 79 colorectal<br />

adenomas. APC (52%) and K-ras (27%) mutations were seen at a similar<br />

frequency to that observed in cancer. p53 mutation (3 cases, 4%) was rare. As<br />

in cancers we did not see any cases with both K-ras and p53 mutation<br />

supporting our previous contention that these mutations may define separate<br />

pathways to colorectal carcinoma.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the important CGH changes seen in cancer were also present in<br />

adenomas. <strong>The</strong> 2 most frequent cancer changes, 20q+ (80%) and 18q- (76%),<br />

were much less common in adenomas (11% and 10% respectively). However<br />

both abnormalities were significantly associated with histological severe<br />

dysplasia (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!