2004 Summer Meeting - Amsterdam - The Pathological Society of ...
2004 Summer Meeting - Amsterdam - The Pathological Society of ...
2004 Summer Meeting - Amsterdam - The Pathological Society of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
117<br />
Expression <strong>of</strong> hTERT in gastrointestinal stromal tumours<br />
occurs preferentially in malignant neoplasms<br />
M Sabah , R Cummins , M Leader , E Kay<br />
Royal College <strong>of</strong> Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 9, Ireland<br />
Background: Telomerase is expressed in many human cancers and cell lines<br />
and is thought to contribute to their immortality. To date, little is known about<br />
the expression <strong>of</strong> telomerase in non-epithelial tumours. <strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this<br />
study was to evaluate the expression <strong>of</strong> human telomerase reverse transcriptase<br />
(hTERT) in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).<br />
Methods: Twenty three GISTs (9 low malignant potential, 10 primary<br />
malignant and 4 intra-abdominal recurrences) were evaluated for hTERT<br />
expression using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray. Tissue blocks<br />
were retrieved and H&E stains were performed to evaluate the histologic<br />
tumour type. All cases were strongly positive for KIT (CD117).<br />
Immunohistochemistry for hTERT was performed.<br />
Results: Eighty nine percent (8/9) <strong>of</strong> the low malignant potential group were<br />
negative for hTERT immunoexpression whereas all malignant GISTs showed<br />
positive staining which varied from weak to strong immunoreactivity. 60%<br />
(6/10) <strong>of</strong> the primary malignant GISTs were strongly positive. <strong>The</strong> remaining<br />
40% (4/10) showed weak staining. All recurrent GISTs (4/4) exhibited strong<br />
positive immunostaining for hTERT.<br />
Conclusions: Telomerase expression occurs during the progression <strong>of</strong> GISTs<br />
and immunohistochemical staining for hTERT may be a useful marker for the<br />
prognostication <strong>of</strong> GISTs<br />
118<br />
Metastatic Lymph Node Deposits Originating From A<br />
Different Primary To That Of <strong>The</strong> Resection Specimen<br />
R Swamy , H M Kamel<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Histopathology, Royal Infirmary, 51, Little France<br />
Crescent, Edinburgh, United Kingdom<br />
We describe an unusual finding in a resection specimen for colonic carcinoma.<br />
<strong>The</strong> primary tumour in the resection specimen was a moderately differentiated<br />
adenocarcinoma <strong>of</strong> the sigmoid colon. Ten out <strong>of</strong> sixteen lymph nodes<br />
retrieved from the specimen including the apical lymph node showed metastatic<br />
adenocarcinoma with a morphological pattern different to that <strong>of</strong> the primary<br />
cancer. A close examination <strong>of</strong> the colonic cancer showed no evidence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
similar phenotype in any part <strong>of</strong> the tumour. <strong>The</strong> morphology <strong>of</strong> a micro-acinar<br />
architecture raised the suspicion <strong>of</strong> metastases from a primary prostatic<br />
adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed which showed positive<br />
staining for PSA and negative staining for CK20 and CEA markers, confirming<br />
our suspicion.<br />
This case highlights the importance <strong>of</strong> proper histological comparison and<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> any variations in the phenotypes between the primary tumour and<br />
their metastases in the draining lymph nodes. While tumour de-differentiation<br />
in nodal metastases is common, unusual variations in tumour phenotype must<br />
be diligently recorded since this can have significant implications on patient<br />
management, staging and prognosis. It can also lead to identification <strong>of</strong> new<br />
pathology or another primary as in this case.<br />
119<br />
Chromosomal Changes in Colorectal Adenomas: Specific<br />
Relation to Gene Mutation and Clinical Utility in Screening<br />
A Leslie , A Stewart , DU Baty , NR Pratt , RJC Steele , FA<br />
Carey<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom<br />
We have previously shown that the model <strong>of</strong> colorectal carcinogenesis<br />
involving sequential changes in the APC, K-ras and p53 genes is not supported<br />
by the mutational pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> cancers (PNAS 2002; 99:9433). We have also<br />
demonstrated specific associations between gene mutations and chromosomal<br />
abnormalities (eg p53 with 20q+, 18q-, 13q+, K-ras with 12p+. Cancer Res<br />
2003; 63:4656).<br />
We have now analysed APC, K-ras and p53 mutations and chromosomal<br />
change by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) in 79 colorectal<br />
adenomas. APC (52%) and K-ras (27%) mutations were seen at a similar<br />
frequency to that observed in cancer. p53 mutation (3 cases, 4%) was rare. As<br />
in cancers we did not see any cases with both K-ras and p53 mutation<br />
supporting our previous contention that these mutations may define separate<br />
pathways to colorectal carcinoma.<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the important CGH changes seen in cancer were also present in<br />
adenomas. <strong>The</strong> 2 most frequent cancer changes, 20q+ (80%) and 18q- (76%),<br />
were much less common in adenomas (11% and 10% respectively). However<br />
both abnormalities were significantly associated with histological severe<br />
dysplasia (p