11.11.2014 Views

Ethiopia and EPA Negotiation 2008 - FES Ethiopia

Ethiopia and EPA Negotiation 2008 - FES Ethiopia

Ethiopia and EPA Negotiation 2008 - FES Ethiopia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.1 Initialling/ acceding to Development Chapter of the Interim <strong>EPA</strong><br />

The legal implication of signing the Interim <strong>EPA</strong> has not been clear. There are<br />

conflicting views of what the process of initialling the IA actually means. There is<br />

no article in the IA that explicitly states what the effect of signing the IA means.<br />

However, there are a number of articles that throw light on to the meaning of<br />

initialling the agreement. For example, Article 6.1 of the ESA IA states that the<br />

trade in goods section will be limited to those countries who make a market<br />

access offer. Article 6.4 states that a signatory state that wants to make a<br />

market access offer may do so subject to approval from the <strong>EPA</strong> committee.<br />

These two articles taken together infer that a country may initial the IA <strong>and</strong> not<br />

make a market access offer.<br />

This would give meaning to Article 4 (f), which states that the development<br />

cooperation aspects are open to LDCs that are not in a position to conclude a<br />

tariff offer with the EC. Therefore taking these three articles it can be determined<br />

that a state may sign the IA <strong>and</strong> not make a market access offer. It would be<br />

eligible for any cooperation under the development cooperation chapters, but<br />

none of the articles of chapter two (trade in goods) would be applicable to that<br />

state.<br />

Essentially initialling the IA will not offer any particular development aid to<br />

<strong>Ethiopia</strong> in the short term; this is because the development cooperation section<br />

will not have any real meaning in the year that the IA is supposed to be valid.<br />

Most of the extra development aid will be available after the signing of the full<br />

<strong>EPA</strong>, for example Aid for Trade is unlikely to come on line before 2010. Therefore<br />

whilst initialling the IA does not require any market access offer, it may not offer<br />

anything tangible in terms of development within the operation of the IA.<br />

The assumption that the IA will operate for just one year may also be<br />

challenged. Whilst Article 3.2 states that the full <strong>EPA</strong> will be completed by 31<br />

December <strong>2008</strong>, Article 62.9 States that application of the IA is until the full <strong>EPA</strong><br />

enters into force. The application of the full <strong>EPA</strong> might be later than the end of<br />

<strong>2008</strong>, in fact the precedent of the negotiations that have occurred so far in the<br />

<strong>EPA</strong> process suggest that the full <strong>EPA</strong> will not be completed by the end of <strong>2008</strong>.<br />

This might be all the likely case given the absence of any extra pressure this time<br />

to conclude the negotiation before the expiry of the waiver. Therefore, the IA<br />

may run longer than the expected one year, it can be seen that Article 62.9 of<br />

the ESA Agreement is a caveat in case the negotiations are not completed. In<br />

27 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!