11.11.2014 Views

Ethiopia and EPA Negotiation 2008 - FES Ethiopia

Ethiopia and EPA Negotiation 2008 - FES Ethiopia

Ethiopia and EPA Negotiation 2008 - FES Ethiopia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

cost. It should also be noted that the ACP-EU development assistance<br />

relationship is regulated under the Cotonou Partnership Agreement <strong>and</strong><br />

channeled through EDF, <strong>and</strong> <strong>EPA</strong>s only replace the trade chapter, not the<br />

whole Cotonou Agreement. The availability of funds under EDF will not be<br />

affected because a country doesn’t sign an Interim <strong>EPA</strong>. Moreover, the<br />

European Union has never threatened to make access to more <strong>and</strong> better aid<br />

resources conditional upon signing a trade agreement to date.<br />

6.2.3 Other Limitations of the EBA Regime<br />

A. Lack of Security of Access<br />

The Everything But Arms is a unilateral measure taken by the European Union. As<br />

such it can be withdrawn any time. This unilateral nature might have affected<br />

the expected Foreign Direct Investment flows deriving from the more generous<br />

market access opportunities.<br />

Moreover, the safeguard clause under the EBA (<strong>and</strong> GSP) is potentially more<br />

easily triggered than the one under the ACP agreements. The EBA clause only<br />

requires that an imported product originating from one of the GSP beneficiaries”<br />

cause(s) or threaten(s) to cause serious difficulties to a Community producer of<br />

like or directly competing products”. The corresponding regulation in the<br />

Cotonou Agreement calls for imports” in such increased quantities <strong>and</strong> under<br />

such conditions as to cause or threaten to cause serious injury to its domestic<br />

producers of like or directly competitive products”. The provision of the Cotonou<br />

Agreement further provides for “serious disturbances in any sector of the<br />

economy or difficulties which could bring about serious deterioration in the<br />

economic situation of the region” as alternative scenarios equally justifying the<br />

application of safeguard measures. Unlike the GSP safeguard scheme, the<br />

Cotonou rules do not expressly define the factors to be taken into account<br />

when examining “serious difficulties”. Also unlike the GSP rules, the Cotonou<br />

Agreement does not provide for temporary withdrawal of the preferential<br />

arrangements in the case of” criminal” activities or the infringement of certain<br />

rules. Similarly the EBA regime can be suspended if the customs declarations of<br />

exporters are found to be incorrect. This inflexible nature doesn’t make it friendly<br />

to economic development in LDCs.<br />

33 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!