13.11.2014 Views

Dwight Lewis Lumber Company, Inc. - Rainforest Alliance

Dwight Lewis Lumber Company, Inc. - Rainforest Alliance

Dwight Lewis Lumber Company, Inc. - Rainforest Alliance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Certified by:<br />

SmartWood Headquarters<br />

65 Millet St. Suite 201<br />

Richmond, VT 05477 USA<br />

Tel: 802-434-5491<br />

Fax: 802-434-3116<br />

www.smartwood.org<br />

Contact person: Jon Jickling<br />

jjickling@ra.org<br />

Audit Managed by:<br />

United States Regional Office<br />

101 E. Fifth St., Suite 208<br />

Northfield, MN 55057<br />

Tel: 507-663-1115<br />

Fax: 507-663-7771<br />

Contact person: Dave Bubser, US<br />

Regional Manager<br />

Email: dbubser@smartwood.org<br />

Forest Management<br />

2007 Annual audit<br />

Report for:<br />

<strong>Dwight</strong> <strong>Lewis</strong> <strong>Lumber</strong><br />

<strong>Company</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />

in<br />

Hillsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA<br />

Certificate code:<br />

Auditors:<br />

Chris Nowak<br />

Audit Dates: November 1, 2007<br />

Report Finalized: January 7, 2008<br />

SW-FM/CoC-1674<br />

ACCREDITED<br />

FSC-ACC-004<br />

Operation Contact:<br />

Melvin <strong>Lewis</strong> and Tim<br />

Fenstermacher<br />

Address: P.O. Box A, Route 87<br />

Hillsgrove, Pennsylvania<br />

18619-0901<br />

© 1996 Forest Stewardship Council A.C.<br />

FM-06 April 2007


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................3<br />

2. AUDIT FINDINGS AND RESULTS ........................................................................................................3<br />

2.1. AUDIT CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................................... 3<br />

2.2. CHANGES IN THE FOREST MANAGEMENT OF THE FME ............................................................................... 3<br />

2.3. STAKEHOLDER ISSUES ................................................................................................................................. 3<br />

2.4. CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS .......................................................... 3<br />

2.5. NEW CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ISSUED AS A RESULT OF THIS AUDIT ............................................................... 5<br />

2.6. AUDIT OBSERVATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 6<br />

3. AUDIT PROCESS ..................................................................................................................................7<br />

3.1. AUDITORS AND QUALIFICATIONS: ................................................................................................................. 7<br />

3.2. AUDIT SCHEDULE.......................................................................................................................................... 7<br />

3.3. SAMPLING METHODOLOGY: .......................................................................................................................... 7<br />

3.4. STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS.................................................................................................... 7<br />

3.5. CHANGES TO CERTIFICATION STANDARDS.................................................................................................. 7<br />

APPENDIX I: List of visited sites (confidential) ..............................................................................................9<br />

APPENDIX II: List of stakeholders consulted (confidential) .........................................................................10<br />

NoneAPPENDIX III: Forest management standard conformance (confidential)..........................................10<br />

APPENDIX III: Forest management standard conformance (confidential) ..................................................11<br />

APPENDIX IV: Chain of Custody Conformance (confidential).....................................................................15<br />

APPENDIX V: FSC Annual Audit Reporting Form: ......................................................................................17<br />

APPENDIX VI: SmartWood Database Update Form ...................................................................................20<br />

APPENDIX VII: Group management conformance checklist (confidential) .................................................21<br />

Standard Conversions<br />

1 mbf = 5.1 m 3<br />

1 cord = 2.55 m 3<br />

1 gallon (US) = 3.78541 liters<br />

1 inch = 2.54 cm<br />

1 foot = 0.3048 m<br />

1 yard = 0.9144 m<br />

1 mile = 1.60934 km<br />

1 acre = 0.405 hectares<br />

1 pound = 0.4536 kg<br />

1 US ton = 907.185 kg<br />

1 UK ton = 1016.047 kg<br />

SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 2 of 25


1. INTRODUCTION<br />

The purpose of this report is to document annual audit conformance of <strong>Dwight</strong> <strong>Lewis</strong> <strong>Lumber</strong><br />

<strong>Company</strong> (DLLC), hereafter referred to as Forest Management Enterprise (FME). The report<br />

presents the findings of SmartWood auditors who have evaluated company systems and<br />

performance against FSC forest management standards and policies. Section 2 of this report<br />

provides the audit conclusions and any necessary follow-up actions by the company through<br />

corrective action requests.<br />

SmartWood audit reports include information which will become public information. Sections 1-3<br />

will be posted on SmartWood’s website according to FSC requirements. All appendices will<br />

remain confidential.<br />

Dispute resolution: If SmartWood clients encounter organizations or individuals having concerns<br />

or comments about <strong>Rainforest</strong> <strong>Alliance</strong> / SmartWood and our services, these parties are strongly<br />

encouraged to contact SmartWood regional or Headquarters offices directly (see contact<br />

information on report cover). Formal complaints or concerns should be sent in writing.<br />

2. AUDIT FINDINGS AND RESULTS<br />

2.1. Audit conclusion<br />

Based on <strong>Company</strong>’s conformance with FSC and SmartWood requirements, the audit<br />

team makes the following recommendation:<br />

Certification requirements met, certificate maintenance recommended<br />

Upon acceptance of CAR(s) issued below<br />

Certification requirements not met:<br />

Conformance with Major CAR(s) required<br />

Additional comments: None<br />

Issues identified as<br />

controversial or hard to<br />

evaluate.<br />

None<br />

2.2. Changes in the forest management of the FME<br />

A property was added to the certified pool (225 acres, Baumunk Family Tract, Overton<br />

Township, Bradford County, Pennsylvania). The total certified area is now 17,331 acres with<br />

46 properties. There have been no other changes in the FME’s forest management system.<br />

2.3. Stakeholder issues<br />

There were no stakeholder issues identified during the audit.<br />

2.4. Conformance with applicable corrective action requests<br />

The section below describes the activities of the certificate holder to address each applicable<br />

corrective action issued during previous evaluations. For each CAR a finding is presented along


with a description of its current status using the following categories. Failure to meet CARs will<br />

result in nonconformances being upgraded from minor to major status with conformance required<br />

within 3 months with risk of suspension or termination of the SmartWood certificate if Major CARs<br />

are not met. The following classification is used to indicate the status of the CAR:<br />

CAR Status<br />

Categories<br />

Closed<br />

Open<br />

Explanation<br />

Certified operation has successfully met the<br />

CAR and addressed the underlying<br />

nonconformance.<br />

Certified operation has not met the CAR;<br />

underlying nonconformance is still present.<br />

CAR becomes a Major CAR with a 3 month<br />

deadline for conformance<br />

CAR 09/05 Reference to Standard: 6.3<br />

Nonconformance<br />

Major Minor<br />

DLLC had little information on ecological characteristics of adjacent<br />

forested stands or frequency, distribution, and intensity of natural<br />

disturbances, nor were landscape patterns used to formulate<br />

management decisions.<br />

Corrective Action Request: DLLC shall incorporate in its management plan and decisionmaking<br />

process consideration of landscape pattern, ecological characteristics of adjacent<br />

stands, species requirements, and frequency, distribution, and intensity of natural<br />

disturbances.<br />

Timeline for conformance: Within 2 years of certification<br />

Evidence to close CAR:<br />

CAR Status:<br />

Follow-up Actions (if app.):<br />

DLLC has incorporated into its management plan and forest<br />

management decision-making process considerations of<br />

landscape pattern, ecological characteristics of adjacent<br />

stands, species requirements, and frequency, distribution, and<br />

intensity of natural disturbances. Guidelines for considering<br />

these factors are outlined in DLLC’s Forest Management Plan<br />

Section 4: Managing Forest Resources – General Policies.<br />

CLOSED<br />

None<br />

CAR 10/05 Reference to Standard: 7.1<br />

Nonconformance Forest-level maps were missing important elements.<br />

Major Minor<br />

Corrective Action Request: DLLC shall develop forest-level maps that focus on relevant<br />

landscape-level factors, including property boundaries, roads, areas of timber production,<br />

forest types by age class, topography, soils, areas of cultural and customary use, locations of<br />

and habitats of RTE and sensitive species, designated High Conservation Value Forest and<br />

associated elements, and riparian zones. In addition, a simple, forest-level vicinity map of all<br />

properties must be produced that shows the 46 different parcels.<br />

Timeline for conformance: Within two years of certification<br />

Evidence to close CAR: Forest-level maps are available for each property that includes<br />

the required elements. A map showing all of the DLLC<br />

SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 4 of 25


CAR Status:<br />

Follow-up Actions (if app.):<br />

properties has been produced.<br />

CLOSED<br />

None<br />

CAR 11/05 Reference to Standard: 7.1<br />

Nonconformance Property maps were missing required elements.<br />

Major Minor<br />

Corrective Action Request: DLLC shall develop and implement policy and procedure for<br />

mapping timber harvest activities at the stand level, including new stand boundaries, landings,<br />

wetlands, springs, vernal pools, rock outcroppings and other special features.<br />

Timeline for conformance: Within two years of certification<br />

Evidence to close CAR: Property-level maps are available for each property that<br />

includes the required elements.<br />

CAR Status:<br />

CLOSED<br />

Follow-up Actions (if app.): None<br />

CAR 12/05 Reference to Standard: 8.4<br />

Nonconformance<br />

Major Minor<br />

The DLLC monitoring plan specified that discrepancies between<br />

outcomes and expectations shall be evaluated annually to effect<br />

necessary changes in management and practice, but the assessment<br />

team was not provided with physical evidence that this monitoring<br />

activity actually occurs.<br />

Corrective Action Request: DLLC shall provide SmartWood with written evidence that its<br />

monitoring activities include annual evaluation of discrepancies between outcomes and<br />

expectations.<br />

Timeline for conformance:<br />

Evidence to close CAR:<br />

CAR Status:<br />

Follow-up Actions (if app.):<br />

By the time of the second annual audit<br />

Written evidence was provided to the auditor that showed that<br />

monitoring activities include annual evaluation of<br />

discrepancies between outcomes and expectations. DLLC has<br />

incorporated in its monitoring log book a form to make<br />

evaluations of management activities on an on-going basis.<br />

CLOSED<br />

None<br />

2.5. New corrective actions issued as a result of this audit<br />

CAR 01/07 Reference to Standard: GC 2<br />

Nonconformance<br />

Major Minor<br />

The group manager has only informally made a full disclosure of all<br />

forest areas over which the GM has some responsibility. Formal,<br />

documented justification for exclusion of forestlands from certified pool<br />

has not been provided.<br />

Corrective Action Request: DLLC shall provide SmartWood written disclosure and<br />

justification for the exclusion of forest lands owned and management by the group manager,<br />

but are not included in the certified pool.<br />

Timeline for conformance: By the time of the third annual audit<br />

SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 5 of 25


2.6. Audit observations<br />

Observations are very minor problems or the early stages of a problem which does not of itself<br />

constitute a non-conformance, but which the auditor considers may lead to a future nonconformance<br />

if not addressed by the client. An observation may be a warning signal on a<br />

particular issue that, if not addressed, could turn into a CAR in the future (or a pre-condition or<br />

condition during a 5 year re-assessment).<br />

OBS 01/07 Reference Standard & Requirement: 6.3.c.1, 6.3.c.2, 6.3.c.5<br />

DLLC was unsure how to manage waste wood on a landing associated with whole-tree<br />

chipping.<br />

Observation: DLLC should conduct further research into Best Management Practices<br />

associated with management of waste fines and chips from whole-tree harvest operations and<br />

develop written policy and procedure to guide future practice.<br />

OBS 02/07 Reference Standard & Requirement: 6.3.b.4, 6.3.c.3, 6.3.c.5<br />

DLLC is planning pre-salvage operations for white ash, prior to the anticipated invasion and<br />

outbreak of non-native emerald ash borer, which is expected to decimate ash populations in<br />

the eastern hardwood region over the next decades. DLLC was found to have developed a<br />

viable mental plan consistent with current, science-based knowledge, but they should<br />

document this plan in writing.<br />

Observation: DLLC should develop written policy, plan and procedures for pre-salvage<br />

operations of white ash in association with the anticipated invasion and outbreak of emerald<br />

ash borer. This policy and procedure should be developed prior to pre-salvage activities, and<br />

should include documentation that shows how the pre-salvage work relates to pertinent FSC<br />

standards.<br />

OBS 03/07 Reference Standard & Requirement: 6.7.e<br />

At an ongoing timber harvest site, the auditor observed an area where waste was observed to<br />

have been piled on site in manners that may have led to small incidences of site contamination<br />

with petroleum products.<br />

Observation: DLLC should formally develop procedures for the proper management of all<br />

waste oil, filters, containers, litter and other forms of waste created during a harvest operation<br />

in a manner that avoids contamination.<br />

OBS 04/07 Reference Standard & Requirement: 6.9.a<br />

DLLC uses seed that includes non-natives, such as orchard grass and vetch. These species<br />

were observed to have germinated and developed only in the areas seeded, but it was unclear<br />

as to whether or not these and other non-native in seed mix might spread into the forest from<br />

the seeded areas.<br />

Observation: DLLC should develop policy and procedure for using non-native plants in seed<br />

mixes and monitoring of said plants and their spread into non-seeded areas of the forest.<br />

SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 6 of 25


3. AUDIT PROCESS<br />

3.1. Auditors and qualifications:<br />

Christopher A. Nowak, PhD (Auditing role: FSC Lead Auditor, Forester) – Associate<br />

Professor. PhD, MS, and BS in Forest Resources Management from SUNY College of<br />

Environmental Science and Forestry-Syracuse; AAS in Forest Technology from SUNY College<br />

of Environmental Science and Forestry-Wanakena. Experience: Associate Professor of<br />

Forestry at SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (9½ years, current); 5½<br />

years as a Research Forester at U.S. Forest Service’s Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Irvine,<br />

PA; 6 years as a Research Scientist with Research Foundation of SUNY, Syracuse, NY; 2<br />

years as a land surveyor in western NY. FSC certification experience since 1997: peer<br />

reviewer, auditor, assessment team member, or lead assessor/team leader for 34 FSC Forest<br />

Management assessments or audits across the eastern hardwood region. Lead<br />

Assessed/Team Led assessments totaling over 2,000,000 acres of forest land in the<br />

Northeastern United States. TRAINING: Team Leader Training, Forest Certification<br />

Assessment, SmartWood, June 1-2, 2001, Minneapolis, MN; SmartWood US Auditor<br />

Procedure Training, SW Audit Procedures, September 29, 2005 (distance learning, web and<br />

conference call).<br />

3.2. Audit schedule<br />

Date Location /Main sites Principal Activities<br />

November<br />

1, 2007<br />

DLLC Office,<br />

Hillsgrove, PA<br />

General discussion of audit procedure; review of<br />

progress on CARs; planning for field site visits.<br />

November Ogdonia Tract Field review of forest management activities.<br />

1, 2007<br />

November<br />

1, 2007<br />

Baumunk Family<br />

Tract<br />

Field review of forest management activities.<br />

Total number of person days used for the audit:1<br />

= number of auditors participating 1 times total number of days spent for the audit 1<br />

3.3. Sampling methodology:<br />

The Ogdonia Tract was chosen because it may be the future area of intensive timber harvest<br />

of white ash in response to potential loss of ash via the emerald ask borer. An ongoing timber<br />

harvest was the reason why the Baumunk Family Tract was chosen for visitation.<br />

3.4. Stakeholder consultation process<br />

Stakeholders were not contacted in association with this annual audit.<br />

3.5. Changes to Certification Standards<br />

Forest stewardship<br />

standard used in audit:<br />

Revisions to the standard<br />

since the last audit:<br />

Final Appalachia (USA) Regional Forest Stewardship Standard<br />

Version 4.2<br />

No changes to standard.<br />

Standard was changed (detail changes below)<br />

SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 7 of 25


Changes in standard:<br />

Implications for FME:<br />

None<br />

Not applicable - no new requirements<br />

SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 8 of 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!