Dwight Lewis Lumber Company, Inc. - Rainforest Alliance
Dwight Lewis Lumber Company, Inc. - Rainforest Alliance
Dwight Lewis Lumber Company, Inc. - Rainforest Alliance
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Certified by:<br />
SmartWood Headquarters<br />
65 Millet St. Suite 201<br />
Richmond, VT 05477 USA<br />
Tel: 802-434-5491<br />
Fax: 802-434-3116<br />
www.smartwood.org<br />
Contact person: Jon Jickling<br />
jjickling@ra.org<br />
Audit Managed by:<br />
United States Regional Office<br />
101 E. Fifth St., Suite 208<br />
Northfield, MN 55057<br />
Tel: 507-663-1115<br />
Fax: 507-663-7771<br />
Contact person: Dave Bubser, US<br />
Regional Manager<br />
Email: dbubser@smartwood.org<br />
Forest Management<br />
2007 Annual audit<br />
Report for:<br />
<strong>Dwight</strong> <strong>Lewis</strong> <strong>Lumber</strong><br />
<strong>Company</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />
in<br />
Hillsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA<br />
Certificate code:<br />
Auditors:<br />
Chris Nowak<br />
Audit Dates: November 1, 2007<br />
Report Finalized: January 7, 2008<br />
SW-FM/CoC-1674<br />
ACCREDITED<br />
FSC-ACC-004<br />
Operation Contact:<br />
Melvin <strong>Lewis</strong> and Tim<br />
Fenstermacher<br />
Address: P.O. Box A, Route 87<br />
Hillsgrove, Pennsylvania<br />
18619-0901<br />
© 1996 Forest Stewardship Council A.C.<br />
FM-06 April 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................3<br />
2. AUDIT FINDINGS AND RESULTS ........................................................................................................3<br />
2.1. AUDIT CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................................... 3<br />
2.2. CHANGES IN THE FOREST MANAGEMENT OF THE FME ............................................................................... 3<br />
2.3. STAKEHOLDER ISSUES ................................................................................................................................. 3<br />
2.4. CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS .......................................................... 3<br />
2.5. NEW CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ISSUED AS A RESULT OF THIS AUDIT ............................................................... 5<br />
2.6. AUDIT OBSERVATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 6<br />
3. AUDIT PROCESS ..................................................................................................................................7<br />
3.1. AUDITORS AND QUALIFICATIONS: ................................................................................................................. 7<br />
3.2. AUDIT SCHEDULE.......................................................................................................................................... 7<br />
3.3. SAMPLING METHODOLOGY: .......................................................................................................................... 7<br />
3.4. STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PROCESS.................................................................................................... 7<br />
3.5. CHANGES TO CERTIFICATION STANDARDS.................................................................................................. 7<br />
APPENDIX I: List of visited sites (confidential) ..............................................................................................9<br />
APPENDIX II: List of stakeholders consulted (confidential) .........................................................................10<br />
NoneAPPENDIX III: Forest management standard conformance (confidential)..........................................10<br />
APPENDIX III: Forest management standard conformance (confidential) ..................................................11<br />
APPENDIX IV: Chain of Custody Conformance (confidential).....................................................................15<br />
APPENDIX V: FSC Annual Audit Reporting Form: ......................................................................................17<br />
APPENDIX VI: SmartWood Database Update Form ...................................................................................20<br />
APPENDIX VII: Group management conformance checklist (confidential) .................................................21<br />
Standard Conversions<br />
1 mbf = 5.1 m 3<br />
1 cord = 2.55 m 3<br />
1 gallon (US) = 3.78541 liters<br />
1 inch = 2.54 cm<br />
1 foot = 0.3048 m<br />
1 yard = 0.9144 m<br />
1 mile = 1.60934 km<br />
1 acre = 0.405 hectares<br />
1 pound = 0.4536 kg<br />
1 US ton = 907.185 kg<br />
1 UK ton = 1016.047 kg<br />
SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 2 of 25
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
The purpose of this report is to document annual audit conformance of <strong>Dwight</strong> <strong>Lewis</strong> <strong>Lumber</strong><br />
<strong>Company</strong> (DLLC), hereafter referred to as Forest Management Enterprise (FME). The report<br />
presents the findings of SmartWood auditors who have evaluated company systems and<br />
performance against FSC forest management standards and policies. Section 2 of this report<br />
provides the audit conclusions and any necessary follow-up actions by the company through<br />
corrective action requests.<br />
SmartWood audit reports include information which will become public information. Sections 1-3<br />
will be posted on SmartWood’s website according to FSC requirements. All appendices will<br />
remain confidential.<br />
Dispute resolution: If SmartWood clients encounter organizations or individuals having concerns<br />
or comments about <strong>Rainforest</strong> <strong>Alliance</strong> / SmartWood and our services, these parties are strongly<br />
encouraged to contact SmartWood regional or Headquarters offices directly (see contact<br />
information on report cover). Formal complaints or concerns should be sent in writing.<br />
2. AUDIT FINDINGS AND RESULTS<br />
2.1. Audit conclusion<br />
Based on <strong>Company</strong>’s conformance with FSC and SmartWood requirements, the audit<br />
team makes the following recommendation:<br />
Certification requirements met, certificate maintenance recommended<br />
Upon acceptance of CAR(s) issued below<br />
Certification requirements not met:<br />
Conformance with Major CAR(s) required<br />
Additional comments: None<br />
Issues identified as<br />
controversial or hard to<br />
evaluate.<br />
None<br />
2.2. Changes in the forest management of the FME<br />
A property was added to the certified pool (225 acres, Baumunk Family Tract, Overton<br />
Township, Bradford County, Pennsylvania). The total certified area is now 17,331 acres with<br />
46 properties. There have been no other changes in the FME’s forest management system.<br />
2.3. Stakeholder issues<br />
There were no stakeholder issues identified during the audit.<br />
2.4. Conformance with applicable corrective action requests<br />
The section below describes the activities of the certificate holder to address each applicable<br />
corrective action issued during previous evaluations. For each CAR a finding is presented along
with a description of its current status using the following categories. Failure to meet CARs will<br />
result in nonconformances being upgraded from minor to major status with conformance required<br />
within 3 months with risk of suspension or termination of the SmartWood certificate if Major CARs<br />
are not met. The following classification is used to indicate the status of the CAR:<br />
CAR Status<br />
Categories<br />
Closed<br />
Open<br />
Explanation<br />
Certified operation has successfully met the<br />
CAR and addressed the underlying<br />
nonconformance.<br />
Certified operation has not met the CAR;<br />
underlying nonconformance is still present.<br />
CAR becomes a Major CAR with a 3 month<br />
deadline for conformance<br />
CAR 09/05 Reference to Standard: 6.3<br />
Nonconformance<br />
Major Minor<br />
DLLC had little information on ecological characteristics of adjacent<br />
forested stands or frequency, distribution, and intensity of natural<br />
disturbances, nor were landscape patterns used to formulate<br />
management decisions.<br />
Corrective Action Request: DLLC shall incorporate in its management plan and decisionmaking<br />
process consideration of landscape pattern, ecological characteristics of adjacent<br />
stands, species requirements, and frequency, distribution, and intensity of natural<br />
disturbances.<br />
Timeline for conformance: Within 2 years of certification<br />
Evidence to close CAR:<br />
CAR Status:<br />
Follow-up Actions (if app.):<br />
DLLC has incorporated into its management plan and forest<br />
management decision-making process considerations of<br />
landscape pattern, ecological characteristics of adjacent<br />
stands, species requirements, and frequency, distribution, and<br />
intensity of natural disturbances. Guidelines for considering<br />
these factors are outlined in DLLC’s Forest Management Plan<br />
Section 4: Managing Forest Resources – General Policies.<br />
CLOSED<br />
None<br />
CAR 10/05 Reference to Standard: 7.1<br />
Nonconformance Forest-level maps were missing important elements.<br />
Major Minor<br />
Corrective Action Request: DLLC shall develop forest-level maps that focus on relevant<br />
landscape-level factors, including property boundaries, roads, areas of timber production,<br />
forest types by age class, topography, soils, areas of cultural and customary use, locations of<br />
and habitats of RTE and sensitive species, designated High Conservation Value Forest and<br />
associated elements, and riparian zones. In addition, a simple, forest-level vicinity map of all<br />
properties must be produced that shows the 46 different parcels.<br />
Timeline for conformance: Within two years of certification<br />
Evidence to close CAR: Forest-level maps are available for each property that includes<br />
the required elements. A map showing all of the DLLC<br />
SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 4 of 25
CAR Status:<br />
Follow-up Actions (if app.):<br />
properties has been produced.<br />
CLOSED<br />
None<br />
CAR 11/05 Reference to Standard: 7.1<br />
Nonconformance Property maps were missing required elements.<br />
Major Minor<br />
Corrective Action Request: DLLC shall develop and implement policy and procedure for<br />
mapping timber harvest activities at the stand level, including new stand boundaries, landings,<br />
wetlands, springs, vernal pools, rock outcroppings and other special features.<br />
Timeline for conformance: Within two years of certification<br />
Evidence to close CAR: Property-level maps are available for each property that<br />
includes the required elements.<br />
CAR Status:<br />
CLOSED<br />
Follow-up Actions (if app.): None<br />
CAR 12/05 Reference to Standard: 8.4<br />
Nonconformance<br />
Major Minor<br />
The DLLC monitoring plan specified that discrepancies between<br />
outcomes and expectations shall be evaluated annually to effect<br />
necessary changes in management and practice, but the assessment<br />
team was not provided with physical evidence that this monitoring<br />
activity actually occurs.<br />
Corrective Action Request: DLLC shall provide SmartWood with written evidence that its<br />
monitoring activities include annual evaluation of discrepancies between outcomes and<br />
expectations.<br />
Timeline for conformance:<br />
Evidence to close CAR:<br />
CAR Status:<br />
Follow-up Actions (if app.):<br />
By the time of the second annual audit<br />
Written evidence was provided to the auditor that showed that<br />
monitoring activities include annual evaluation of<br />
discrepancies between outcomes and expectations. DLLC has<br />
incorporated in its monitoring log book a form to make<br />
evaluations of management activities on an on-going basis.<br />
CLOSED<br />
None<br />
2.5. New corrective actions issued as a result of this audit<br />
CAR 01/07 Reference to Standard: GC 2<br />
Nonconformance<br />
Major Minor<br />
The group manager has only informally made a full disclosure of all<br />
forest areas over which the GM has some responsibility. Formal,<br />
documented justification for exclusion of forestlands from certified pool<br />
has not been provided.<br />
Corrective Action Request: DLLC shall provide SmartWood written disclosure and<br />
justification for the exclusion of forest lands owned and management by the group manager,<br />
but are not included in the certified pool.<br />
Timeline for conformance: By the time of the third annual audit<br />
SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 5 of 25
2.6. Audit observations<br />
Observations are very minor problems or the early stages of a problem which does not of itself<br />
constitute a non-conformance, but which the auditor considers may lead to a future nonconformance<br />
if not addressed by the client. An observation may be a warning signal on a<br />
particular issue that, if not addressed, could turn into a CAR in the future (or a pre-condition or<br />
condition during a 5 year re-assessment).<br />
OBS 01/07 Reference Standard & Requirement: 6.3.c.1, 6.3.c.2, 6.3.c.5<br />
DLLC was unsure how to manage waste wood on a landing associated with whole-tree<br />
chipping.<br />
Observation: DLLC should conduct further research into Best Management Practices<br />
associated with management of waste fines and chips from whole-tree harvest operations and<br />
develop written policy and procedure to guide future practice.<br />
OBS 02/07 Reference Standard & Requirement: 6.3.b.4, 6.3.c.3, 6.3.c.5<br />
DLLC is planning pre-salvage operations for white ash, prior to the anticipated invasion and<br />
outbreak of non-native emerald ash borer, which is expected to decimate ash populations in<br />
the eastern hardwood region over the next decades. DLLC was found to have developed a<br />
viable mental plan consistent with current, science-based knowledge, but they should<br />
document this plan in writing.<br />
Observation: DLLC should develop written policy, plan and procedures for pre-salvage<br />
operations of white ash in association with the anticipated invasion and outbreak of emerald<br />
ash borer. This policy and procedure should be developed prior to pre-salvage activities, and<br />
should include documentation that shows how the pre-salvage work relates to pertinent FSC<br />
standards.<br />
OBS 03/07 Reference Standard & Requirement: 6.7.e<br />
At an ongoing timber harvest site, the auditor observed an area where waste was observed to<br />
have been piled on site in manners that may have led to small incidences of site contamination<br />
with petroleum products.<br />
Observation: DLLC should formally develop procedures for the proper management of all<br />
waste oil, filters, containers, litter and other forms of waste created during a harvest operation<br />
in a manner that avoids contamination.<br />
OBS 04/07 Reference Standard & Requirement: 6.9.a<br />
DLLC uses seed that includes non-natives, such as orchard grass and vetch. These species<br />
were observed to have germinated and developed only in the areas seeded, but it was unclear<br />
as to whether or not these and other non-native in seed mix might spread into the forest from<br />
the seeded areas.<br />
Observation: DLLC should develop policy and procedure for using non-native plants in seed<br />
mixes and monitoring of said plants and their spread into non-seeded areas of the forest.<br />
SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 6 of 25
3. AUDIT PROCESS<br />
3.1. Auditors and qualifications:<br />
Christopher A. Nowak, PhD (Auditing role: FSC Lead Auditor, Forester) – Associate<br />
Professor. PhD, MS, and BS in Forest Resources Management from SUNY College of<br />
Environmental Science and Forestry-Syracuse; AAS in Forest Technology from SUNY College<br />
of Environmental Science and Forestry-Wanakena. Experience: Associate Professor of<br />
Forestry at SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (9½ years, current); 5½<br />
years as a Research Forester at U.S. Forest Service’s Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Irvine,<br />
PA; 6 years as a Research Scientist with Research Foundation of SUNY, Syracuse, NY; 2<br />
years as a land surveyor in western NY. FSC certification experience since 1997: peer<br />
reviewer, auditor, assessment team member, or lead assessor/team leader for 34 FSC Forest<br />
Management assessments or audits across the eastern hardwood region. Lead<br />
Assessed/Team Led assessments totaling over 2,000,000 acres of forest land in the<br />
Northeastern United States. TRAINING: Team Leader Training, Forest Certification<br />
Assessment, SmartWood, June 1-2, 2001, Minneapolis, MN; SmartWood US Auditor<br />
Procedure Training, SW Audit Procedures, September 29, 2005 (distance learning, web and<br />
conference call).<br />
3.2. Audit schedule<br />
Date Location /Main sites Principal Activities<br />
November<br />
1, 2007<br />
DLLC Office,<br />
Hillsgrove, PA<br />
General discussion of audit procedure; review of<br />
progress on CARs; planning for field site visits.<br />
November Ogdonia Tract Field review of forest management activities.<br />
1, 2007<br />
November<br />
1, 2007<br />
Baumunk Family<br />
Tract<br />
Field review of forest management activities.<br />
Total number of person days used for the audit:1<br />
= number of auditors participating 1 times total number of days spent for the audit 1<br />
3.3. Sampling methodology:<br />
The Ogdonia Tract was chosen because it may be the future area of intensive timber harvest<br />
of white ash in response to potential loss of ash via the emerald ask borer. An ongoing timber<br />
harvest was the reason why the Baumunk Family Tract was chosen for visitation.<br />
3.4. Stakeholder consultation process<br />
Stakeholders were not contacted in association with this annual audit.<br />
3.5. Changes to Certification Standards<br />
Forest stewardship<br />
standard used in audit:<br />
Revisions to the standard<br />
since the last audit:<br />
Final Appalachia (USA) Regional Forest Stewardship Standard<br />
Version 4.2<br />
No changes to standard.<br />
Standard was changed (detail changes below)<br />
SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 7 of 25
Changes in standard:<br />
Implications for FME:<br />
None<br />
Not applicable - no new requirements<br />
SmartWood Forest Management Annual Audit Report Page 8 of 25