15.11.2014 Views

Effect of spacing and thinning date on the yield of broadcast nakati

Effect of spacing and thinning date on the yield of broadcast nakati

Effect of spacing and thinning date on the yield of broadcast nakati

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Spacing <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>thinning</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>date</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>yield</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>broadcast</strong> <strong>nakati</strong><br />

137<br />

Table 1. Comparis<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>nakati</strong> <strong>yield</strong> from ‘setting’ <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> no <str<strong>on</strong>g>thinning</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> that from various <str<strong>on</strong>g>thinning</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>date</str<strong>on</strong>g>s x <str<strong>on</strong>g>spacing</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatment combinati<strong>on</strong>s in central Ug<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>a.<br />

Treatments Edible porti<strong>on</strong> Edible porti<strong>on</strong> Reject porti<strong>on</strong> Reject porti<strong>on</strong> Canopy height<br />

plant -1 (g) (kg ha -1 ) plant -1 (g) (kg ha -1 ) (cm)<br />

Setting 4.89 1174 9.2 1919 37.2<br />

No <str<strong>on</strong>g>thinning</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5.05 1164 8.2 1932 36.0<br />

Mean 4.97 1169 8.7 1926 36.6<br />

Thinning <str<strong>on</strong>g>date</str<strong>on</strong>g> * (weeks) x <str<strong>on</strong>g>spacing</str<strong>on</strong>g> (cm)<br />

2; 5 x 5 8.30 1403 14.5 1267 38.9<br />

2; 10 x 10 11.41 1295 14.8 1484 34.1<br />

2; 15 x 15 15.24 1101 21.0 1474 32.4<br />

2; 20 x 20 23.73 1230 28.5 1506 34.5<br />

3; 5 x 5 10.89 1190 16.4 1722 38.1<br />

3; 10 x 10 12.55 997 17.2 1300 31.9<br />

3; 15 x 15 21.71 1260 17.2 1698 39.3<br />

3; 20 x 20 25.36 1043 34.9 1199 33.1<br />

4; 5 x 5 9.43 1274 16.5 1782 37.3<br />

4; 10 x 10 13.22 1042 18.7 1415 32.9<br />

4; 15 x 15 14.55 1006 16.7 1050 32.0<br />

4; 20 x 20 30.95 1151 38.5 1216 31.4<br />

Mean 16.45 1166 21.2 1484 34.7<br />

S.E.D 4.88 171.3 9.31 340.5 5.0<br />

* Weeks after emergence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>nakati</strong> x <str<strong>on</strong>g>spacing</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatment combinati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>thinning</str<strong>on</strong>g> x <str<strong>on</strong>g>spacing</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatment combinati<strong>on</strong>s showed that<br />

<strong>the</strong> former practices resulted in significantly lower edible<br />

<strong>yield</strong> per <strong>nakati</strong> plant (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!