15.11.2014 Views

Effect of spacing and thinning date on the yield of broadcast nakati

Effect of spacing and thinning date on the yield of broadcast nakati

Effect of spacing and thinning date on the yield of broadcast nakati

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138 C.K. SSEKABEMBE & T. L. ODONG<br />

significantly but <strong>the</strong> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> filled grains per panicle<br />

decreased significantly, indicating <strong>the</strong> compensatory<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ship between <strong>the</strong>se traits. At <strong>the</strong> lower seeding<br />

rate <strong>the</strong>re is an increase in <strong>the</strong> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> filled grains per<br />

panicle which compensates for <strong>the</strong> lower panicle density<br />

(Gravois <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Helms, 1992). Similarly, uniculm barley lines<br />

in Australia have more spikelets per ear than <strong>the</strong> tillering<br />

varieties but <strong>the</strong>y tended to set fewer grains per spikelet<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> produced smaller kernels (McD<strong>on</strong>ald, 1990). However,<br />

it is not true that grain <strong>yield</strong> comp<strong>on</strong>ents are always<br />

mutually compensatory as <strong>the</strong> case in <strong>the</strong> above examples.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>nakati</strong>, studies <strong>on</strong> <strong>yield</strong> comp<strong>on</strong>ents<br />

seem to be lacking, which is partly attributed to limited<br />

research <strong>on</strong> this crop (Rubaihayo, 1994; Schippers, 2000).<br />

N<strong>on</strong>e<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> present study showed that although both<br />

‘setting’ <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> no <str<strong>on</strong>g>thinning</str<strong>on</strong>g> resulted in less reject per plant<br />

(8.7 g per plant <strong>on</strong> average) than <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>thinning</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>date</str<strong>on</strong>g> x <str<strong>on</strong>g>spacing</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

treatment combinati<strong>on</strong>s (an average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 21.2 g per plant),<br />

<strong>the</strong> former resulted in a significantly (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!