16.11.2014 Views

Hmong and Lao Refugee Women - Hmong Studies Internet ...

Hmong and Lao Refugee Women - Hmong Studies Internet ...

Hmong and Lao Refugee Women - Hmong Studies Internet ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Hmong</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Lao</strong> <strong>Refugee</strong> <strong>Women</strong>: Reflections of a <strong>Hmong</strong>-American Woman Anthropologist by Dia Cha, Ph.D. <strong>Hmong</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> Journal,<br />

2005, 6: 1-35.<br />

according to UNHCR regulations, these woman should have been granted the sort of legitimate change of<br />

status which would have allowed them to decline this repatriation.<br />

The author, accordingly, spoke to a UNHCR case worker in the matter, <strong>and</strong> it was discovered that<br />

important documents were missing from the files of the three women concerned. The case worker, in<br />

consequence, suggested that the documents, detailing the circumstances of the arrest of husb<strong>and</strong>s in <strong>Lao</strong>s,<br />

should be submitted to the UNHCR branch office in Bangkok. This was done, <strong>and</strong> the documents were<br />

duly submitted with a letter requesting a review of the case. In addition, a transcription of the interview<br />

between the three women <strong>and</strong> the author was included in the packet. Two weeks after the author's<br />

departure from Napho camp, the women's cases were reviewed. Subsequently, too, rumors of the episode<br />

spread quickly. In the event, many asylum seekers – who had already been screened out of eligibility –<br />

went to the UNHCR office in the camp <strong>and</strong> requested that their cases, too, be reviewed.<br />

As may be imagined, this created something of a dilemma for UNHCR, <strong>and</strong> several UNHCR<br />

officials became quite incensed at the author's involvement. The author had, so it was said, exceeded<br />

research dem<strong>and</strong>s to become a refugee advocate, <strong>and</strong> the screening process – a highly politicized affair –<br />

should have been considered by her as being "off limits." The fallout from this awkward development<br />

was not without its adverse aspect, for, when the author returned from a trip to <strong>Lao</strong>s expecting to travel to<br />

the refugee camp at Chieng Kham, the office of UNHCR in Bangkok refused to grant a camp pass. The<br />

author was thereafter barred from any further visits to Chieng Kham. 15<br />

This incident is instructive, touching, as it does, on the nature of the boundary between scholarly<br />

interviewer, friend, <strong>and</strong> legal advocate – a boundary much considered in the body of the article, above. In<br />

an examination of the incident, the question must be asked, "Where does one draw the line, <strong>and</strong> what<br />

might have been done differently in order to avoid this situation, so uncomfortable for all concerned?"<br />

Many alternatives suggest themselves, none entirely satisfactory. In retrospect, however, the actions<br />

15 It seemed, after this incident, that UNHCR would never again allow access to the camps where this research<br />

project had been conducted. However, during a subsequent visit to Thail<strong>and</strong> to present research findings at a related<br />

conference, a director of one of the UNHCR offices in Napho camp offered permission to return after graduation – a<br />

considerable surprise.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!