17.11.2014 Views

Dudgeon Point Coal Terminals Project – Q and As - North ...

Dudgeon Point Coal Terminals Project – Q and As - North ...

Dudgeon Point Coal Terminals Project – Q and As - North ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Q&<strong>As</strong><br />

Update No. 4 – May 2013<br />

Proposed Development at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong><br />

What does the proposed development include?<br />

There will be two separate coal terminals constructed at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong>. Each will be built in stages as<br />

coal export dem<strong>and</strong> increases. The ultimate development at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> will include:<br />

six rail loops <strong>and</strong> dump stations;<br />

large stockyards using stacker reclaimers;<br />

eight new offshore berths <strong>and</strong> two jetties to the offshore wharves;<br />

rail spur line to <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong>;<br />

expansion of Half Tide Tug Harbour to accommodate extra tugs;<br />

support infrastructure (roads, buildings, barge facilities etc.); <strong>and</strong><br />

total cost is $10-$12 billion.<br />

Who will be building the coal terminals?<br />

NQBP has undertaken the master planning for this port development <strong>and</strong> is coordinating environmental<br />

studies <strong>and</strong> approvals for the development to allow cumulative impacts of the whole development to be<br />

assessed.<br />

NQBP is the port authority <strong>and</strong> it will not operate a coal terminal or carry out any coal h<strong>and</strong>ling.<br />

The preferred development proponents for the two terminals are <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Project</strong> Management<br />

Pty Ltd (DPPM) <strong>and</strong> Adani Mining. They will design, build <strong>and</strong> operate the terminals to comply with the<br />

environmental approval conditions. Aurizon is the appointed Rail Infrastructure Manager <strong>and</strong> they will<br />

design <strong>and</strong> build the rail spur line to the site.<br />

What is the expected capacity of the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> site?<br />

NQBP carried out master planning of the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> site over 2011 <strong>and</strong> 2012 to optimise the site<br />

lay-out. This master planning work indicates that the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> site is capable of achieving a<br />

throughput of up to 180 million tonnes per annum (Mtpa). This site optimisation has been achieved while<br />

remaining consistent with the approved L<strong>and</strong> Use Plan <strong>and</strong> without compromising environmental values<br />

of the site.<br />

Although the site may be capable of an export capacity of 180 Mtpa, development at the site will occur in<br />

stages <strong>and</strong> this ultimate capacity is expected to be built over a 15 – 20 year period.<br />

What are the dimensions of the stockyards at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>and</strong> how high will the stockpiles<br />

be?<br />

The total stockyard area recommended in the Master Plan is around 400 ha, which will be developed in<br />

stages over a 15 to 20 year period. The initial terminal development is likely to have a coal footprint of<br />

only around 70 ha (Stage 1 of one terminal).<br />

Page | 1


NQBP owns 1400 ha of l<strong>and</strong> at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong>, with around 700 ha being allocated to conservation <strong>and</strong><br />

general buffer zones. The stockyard heights are expected to be similar to current terminals at Hay <strong>Point</strong>.<br />

Stockpile heights will be up to 15 m.<br />

Is any development proposed at the community of Louisa Creek?<br />

The proposed port expansion does not involve any terminal development at Louisa Creek. There will be<br />

no conveyor or road connections across Louisa Creek from the current Dalrymple Bay <strong>Coal</strong> Terminal.<br />

The proposed project does not require resumptions of any properties at Louisa Creek based on the<br />

current knowledge of impacts.<br />

Some support services, however, are being considered for the Louisa Creek area. These include a<br />

Temporary Workforce Accommodation Village on Louisa Creek Road <strong>and</strong> a possible power connection<br />

across NQBP’s l<strong>and</strong> at Louisa Creek (the power route is still being studied by Ergon).<br />

The Accommodation Village on Louisa Creek Road is only expected to be required if both coal terminals<br />

were under construction at the same time.<br />

Why is dredging needed <strong>and</strong> how much material is being dredged?<br />

Dredging is needed to increase the water depth available for the international shipping using the port.<br />

Dredging for the project will be carried out in stages to match the development of offshore berths. A total<br />

of 14 million cubic metres of material will need to be dredged in the offshore berth area for ship berth<br />

pockets <strong>and</strong> extension of the ship departure path. The maximum amount that will be dredged in any one<br />

year is 5.6 million cubic metres.<br />

To put this into context, in 2006, NQBP dredged around 9 million cubic metres of material in the Port of<br />

Hay <strong>Point</strong> <strong>and</strong> relocated it to an offshore relocation area in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. There<br />

were no significant or long term environmental impacts from the dredging apart from increased water<br />

turbidity during the dredging itself. No impacts on fishery values were reported.<br />

Where will the dredged material be moved to?<br />

Extensive studies have been carried out on disposal options, including recycling, reuse, disposal on<br />

shore <strong>and</strong> relocation offshore. Independent consultants have recommended relocating the clean<br />

dredged material to a new offshore relocation area to provide the best overall environmental outcomes.<br />

The relocation area is in deep water of around 22-24 metres deep <strong>and</strong> has been surveyed to ensure<br />

there is no significant habitat in the area. Modelling of the dredge plume indicates no environmentally<br />

significant habitats will be materially affected.<br />

Material for ocean disposal is tested under rigorous requirements set out by the National Australian<br />

Guidelines for Dredging (NADG) in accordance with London Protocol, an international agreement<br />

relating to the disposal of dredged material in Australian waters. Only material that has been tested <strong>and</strong><br />

determined suitable for ocean disposal is disposed of at sea.<br />

Page | 2


<strong>Project</strong> Timing<br />

When will the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> <strong>Terminals</strong> be built?<br />

Should the appropriate approvals be obtained, construction of at least one of the two terminals is<br />

currently expected to commence in late 2015 <strong>and</strong> start operations in 2018/19. The terminals will each be<br />

built in stages over a 15 to 20 year period to match coal export dem<strong>and</strong>. However, the start of<br />

construction is subject to both the State <strong>and</strong> Commonwealth first approving the proposed project to<br />

proceed <strong>and</strong> the proposed terminal developers assessing the financial feasibility of proceeding based on<br />

final approval conditions <strong>and</strong> the coal market at the time.<br />

When will a decision be made to build the coal terminal?<br />

The decision is dependent on obtaining the required environmental approvals. The proposed timeline is:<br />

Early 2014 Submission of Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)<br />

Mid 2014<br />

Anticipated gaining of State <strong>and</strong> Federal Government approvals<br />

Mid to late 2015 Begin construction of support facilities (rail, roads, buildings, dredging)<br />

Late 2015<br />

Begin construction of one or both coal terminals<br />

2018/9 Stage 1 of the development begins exporting coal.<br />

Environmental Studies <strong>and</strong> Approvals<br />

What approvals are required for the proposed project?<br />

The <strong>Project</strong> requires both State <strong>and</strong> Commonwealth approvals before it can proceed. State assessment<br />

occurs under State Development Public Works Organisation Act 1971 <strong>and</strong> approvals under numerous<br />

pieces of State legislation are required. Commonwealth approvals under the Environment Protection <strong>and</strong><br />

Biodiversity Conservation Act <strong>and</strong> the Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Act are required.<br />

Both State <strong>and</strong> Commonwealth Governments have requested that an Environmental Impact Statement<br />

(EIS) be prepared, which will provide the information required by government agencies to assess the<br />

<strong>Project</strong>.<br />

What is the purpose of an EIS?<br />

One of the major purposes of an EIS is to study the existing environment to determine environmental<br />

<strong>and</strong> social values in the development area, to determine potential impacts from the proposed<br />

development, <strong>and</strong> to recommend appropriate measures to mitigate or control any adverse impacts of this<br />

proposal.<br />

All levels of government consider this information in deciding whether or not they will grant approvals<br />

<strong>and</strong> under what conditions approvals will be granted to allow development.<br />

Who does the EIS <strong>and</strong> what is included in the studies?<br />

The studies are undertaken by environmental specialists independent of NQBP <strong>and</strong> the other project<br />

proponents. The government determines the scope of the studies specific to each development proposal<br />

(Terms of Reference) <strong>and</strong> these include the study of the following for <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong>:<br />

flora <strong>and</strong> fauna impacts;<br />

impacts on water quality (ground <strong>and</strong> marine) <strong>and</strong> hydrology;<br />

marine impacts (turtles, whales, dolphins, seagrasses, water quality etc.);<br />

Page | 3


modelling of offshore water flows <strong>and</strong> sediment transport;<br />

noise <strong>and</strong> dust impacts;<br />

amenity impacts;<br />

traffic studies;<br />

shipping impacts;<br />

fishing impacts;<br />

housing impacts;<br />

native title <strong>and</strong> cultural heritage;<br />

emergency response; <strong>and</strong><br />

full Social Impact <strong>As</strong>sessment <strong>and</strong> Social Impact Management Plan.<br />

Will there be any studies that investigate on the impact of people’s health caused by the new<br />

terminals?<br />

The Queensl<strong>and</strong> Government establishes health parameters <strong>and</strong> acceptable levels of coal dust <strong>and</strong><br />

noise for all new projects in Queensl<strong>and</strong>. The parameters are determined <strong>and</strong> established through<br />

evidence-based research to ensure that st<strong>and</strong>ards are sufficient to protect health.<br />

The EIS will use noise <strong>and</strong> dust modelling to predict air <strong>and</strong> noise quality levels when the terminals are<br />

operating to allow a comparison with health st<strong>and</strong>ards set by government.<br />

What other impact issues are being considered?<br />

A Social Impact <strong>As</strong>sessment (SIA) <strong>and</strong> Social Impact Management Plan (SIMP) for the proposed<br />

development are being carried out. Studies included in this assessment comprise:<br />

demographic profile;<br />

employment <strong>and</strong> economic profile;<br />

housing;<br />

health;<br />

local community profile; <strong>and</strong><br />

mitigation/management strategies.<br />

These studies will be presented to the public <strong>and</strong> agencies as part of the EIS.<br />

The proposed project was declared significant by the Coordinator-General. What does this mean<br />

for approvals?<br />

The Coordinator-General has declared <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> <strong>Terminals</strong> a “significant project for which an<br />

EIS is required” under Section 26 (1) (a) of the State Development Public Works Organisation Act 1971.<br />

This declaration requires the proposal to carry out a comprehensive environmental assessment for<br />

submission to government. The proposed project must still obtain all the necessary environmental or<br />

development approvals required in Queensl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> it must still comply with all environmental or<br />

planning legislation.<br />

The Coordinator-General determined the environmental studies to be undertaken for its thorough<br />

assessment of the proposed project through preparation of Terms of Reference for the EIS. The public<br />

provided comments on the Terms of Reference before it was finalised in June 2012.<br />

Page | 4


When is the EIS expected to be released?<br />

The EIS is not expected to be released for public comment before the end of 2013.<br />

At the time of designation of the project, the State Development Public Works Organisation Act 1971<br />

sets a requirement that the EIS must be released for public comment within two years of finalisation of<br />

the EIS Terms of Reference. The project is therefore required to release the EIS by June 2014 at the<br />

latest.<br />

Air Quality <strong>and</strong> Dust<br />

How is dust monitored at the existing coal terminals?<br />

There is an extensive noise <strong>and</strong> dust monitoring system around the port <strong>and</strong> in the local communities.<br />

This program has been operating for twenty years <strong>and</strong> is funded by the operators of the two Hay <strong>Point</strong><br />

coal terminals <strong>and</strong> NQBP.<br />

There are 19 dust deposition gauges, as well as four community-based stations that continuously<br />

monitor noise <strong>and</strong> dust. Dust samples from community areas are analysed for coal dust content monthly.<br />

Monthly dust monitoring reports are published on NQBP’s website when received from the independent<br />

consultant analysing the results.<br />

The continuous noise <strong>and</strong> dust monitoring stations are located at Half Tide, Salonika <strong>and</strong> two are at<br />

either end of Louisa Creek.<br />

NQBP <strong>and</strong> its program partners have recently extended its dust monitoring program to include McEwens<br />

Beach. Dust monitoring equipment which measures PM 10 <strong>and</strong> PM 2.5 was installed in McEwens Beach in<br />

March 2013. The PM 2.5 dust monitor will be a mobile unit so it will be able to be moved to different<br />

locations to provide information for other communities as required.<br />

Is there going to be an increase in noise <strong>and</strong> dust as a result of this development?<br />

Because new noise <strong>and</strong> dust sources are being introduced, there is likely to be an increase in dust <strong>and</strong><br />

noise for some residents. However, dust <strong>and</strong> noise modelling is being undertaken to predict any potential<br />

increases. This information will be used to recommend appropriate controls to minimise community<br />

impacts.<br />

How are dust modelling studies carried out?<br />

NQBP engaged Katestone Environmental to undertake modelling of dust impacts. Using existing air<br />

quality as a basis, modelling is used to predict the cumulative impact of the development i.e. the<br />

expected future air quality once the new terminals are fully operational.<br />

Predicting coal dust impacts before the terminal is in operation is based on scientific 3D modelling<br />

assuming maximum capacity of stockpiling <strong>and</strong> coal movements <strong>and</strong> worst case wind conditions. The<br />

model uses data from the long-term dust monitoring program around the port plus emissions data<br />

established from Australian <strong>and</strong> U.S. studies to make accurate predictions.<br />

Dust modelling studies will be published in the EIS for agency <strong>and</strong> public comment. Preliminary results<br />

were presented to local communities at a special Community Reference Group meeting in August 2012.<br />

Page | 5


How will dust be controlled during the construction phase?<br />

The main sources of dust during the construction phase come from clearing, earth moving <strong>and</strong> vehicle<br />

movements on the site. Management of dust during construction will primarily involve management<br />

techniques including the application of water/dust suppressant, or minimising dust-producing activities in<br />

dry <strong>and</strong> windy periods or when in close proximity to affected communities.<br />

Studies are being undertaken for the EIS to identify <strong>and</strong> mitigate noise issues during the construction<br />

phase. These studies will be presented in the EIS.<br />

How will dust be controlled once the proposed <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> <strong>Terminals</strong> are operating?<br />

The main sources of potential dust at the proposed terminals will be from the coal stockpiles, coal<br />

unloading facilities at the railway loop <strong>and</strong> coal load-out facilities.<br />

Detailed dust modelling has been undertaken during the EIS development <strong>and</strong> mitigation measures will<br />

be incorporated in the operational procedures in an Environmental Management Plan.<br />

Dust control measures to be employed will include:<br />

moisture monitoring <strong>and</strong> control at the rail receival area;<br />

rail unloading in buildings for dust containment;<br />

computer-controlled water spray systems in the stockyard to keep coal moist, which minimises<br />

dustiness;<br />

use of dust suppressants on stockpiles in high wind conditions;<br />

belt scrapers <strong>and</strong> water wash on conveyor belt returns; <strong>and</strong><br />

equipment designs to reduce dust generation.<br />

The complete list of dust controls will be provided in the EIS.<br />

How will dust from rail wagons be managed?<br />

Aurizon (formerly QR National) has carried out trials on dust suppressants applied to the top of the coal<br />

in wagons. Monitoring has shown the dust suppressant/veneer will stay in place for the rail journey to the<br />

port <strong>and</strong> significantly reduces dust emissions from rail wagons.<br />

There are 19 mines which use the Goonyella rail system to transport coal to the Port of Hay <strong>Point</strong>. Of<br />

these, seven mines have had a coal veneering station installed, three mines have started installing a<br />

station, <strong>and</strong> the remaining nine mines plan to have stations installed by the end of 2013.<br />

All coal mines exporting coal from <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> will be required to apply veneer before transportation<br />

to the Port.<br />

Noise<br />

How will noise be controlled once the proposed <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> <strong>Terminals</strong> are operating?<br />

The main sources of operational noise at the proposed terminals will be generated by train movements,<br />

coal receiving stations, conveyors, stacker-reclaimers <strong>and</strong> coal load-out facilities. The terminals will be<br />

located approximately one kilometre from the western end of the closest community at Louisa Creek <strong>and</strong><br />

four kilometres from McEwens Beach.<br />

Page | 6


Noise emissions at the proposed terminals will be managed through the following:<br />

environmental bunds <strong>and</strong> structural noise barriers adjacent to the rail line near any communities;<br />

rail unloading in a noise-insulated building;<br />

use of low noise idlers on conveyors; <strong>and</strong><br />

the use of low noise drives for conveyors <strong>and</strong> yard machines.<br />

A noise <strong>and</strong> vibration assessment is being undertaken as part of the EIS. Noise modelling will be used to<br />

determine where noise mitigation measures are required. These studies will be published in the EIS.<br />

Noise monitoring (in conjunction with dust monitoring described above) is carried out in four community<br />

based locations. A noise monitor will be installed at McEwens Beach in the near future to provide<br />

background data ahead of the proposed construction at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong>.<br />

Will the trains be operating all hours?<br />

Yes, the trains will be operating 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The trains are similar to those<br />

which transport coal to the existing coal terminals, that is, two kilometres in length. Double length trains,<br />

that is, up to four kilometres long, may access the site at a future time, though no plans have been<br />

determined.<br />

How many trains will operate each day?<br />

Train numbers will gradually increase as the terminal capacity at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> is exp<strong>and</strong>ed.<br />

After both terminals reach their ultimate capacity in 15- 20 years, there would be an average of 40 trains<br />

per day going both to as well as from the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> <strong>Terminals</strong> when eventually exp<strong>and</strong>ed to<br />

their ultimate capacity. Train numbers will be much less in the early years of the proposed project.<br />

What is the anticipated noise level from the proposed <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> <strong>Terminals</strong>?<br />

Noise is additive, so the noise level at any location will depend on the existing noise environment e.g.<br />

proximity to roads etc. Noise generated by the project will be estimated <strong>and</strong> noise contours in areas<br />

around the port will be presented in the EIS. This noise modelling will be used to indicate where<br />

additional noise controls may need to be applied.<br />

Will diesel locomotives be used into <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong>?<br />

The rail system servicing mines in the Bowen Basin is electrified <strong>and</strong> mines transporting to existing Hay<br />

<strong>Point</strong> coal terminals currently all use electric locomotives, although an occasional diesel locomotive has<br />

been used to ship coal to the port for rail operational needs. The Bowen Basin mines transporting to<br />

<strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> are also expected to use electric locomotives.<br />

Trains to the more northern Port of Abbot <strong>Point</strong> are all diesel locomotives because its rail system is not<br />

fully electrified. Mines in the Galilee Basin will largely go to Abbot <strong>Point</strong> however the Carmichael <strong>Coal</strong><br />

Mine in the Galilee Basin is expected to rail some coal to Adani’s proposed terminal at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong>.<br />

This coal will, of necessity, be railed using diesel locomotives. Consequently, a small proportion of the<br />

trains to <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> could use diesel locomotives.<br />

Noise studies indicate that the diesel <strong>and</strong> electric locomotives have similar noise levels, but the noise<br />

from the diesel locomotives is lower in frequency <strong>and</strong> may be more noticeable at a distance. Noise<br />

modelling includes the effect of diesel locomotives <strong>and</strong> the results will be presented in the EIS.<br />

Page | 7


Roads <strong>and</strong> Traffic<br />

How is the increased traffic on Hay <strong>Point</strong> Road going to be managed during construction?<br />

The construction of the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> <strong>Terminals</strong>, offshore wharves, the railway spur <strong>and</strong><br />

supporting infrastructure will be carried out in stages, with construction of the stages likely to occur<br />

intermittently over a 10 to 20-year period. This will generate an increase in road traffic on Hay <strong>Point</strong><br />

Road.<br />

To reduce the volume of construction worker vehicles on the local roads, workers will be largely<br />

transported by bus to <strong>and</strong> from the site from pick-up points in Mackay <strong>and</strong> Sarina.<br />

The BMA HPX3 expansion will be completed before commencement of the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Coal</strong><br />

<strong>Terminals</strong> which will reduce the number of construction vehicles as a baseline. The development has<br />

been designed as a cut <strong>and</strong> fill operation to minimise the volume of material imported or exported by<br />

earth moving trucks from the site. Rock revetment walls will be required for some marine works that will<br />

require transport of rocks early in the development stage only. The EIS will document any of these<br />

requirements.<br />

Further, a large number of large construction components are expected to be shipped to the Port of<br />

Mackay, offloaded <strong>and</strong> barged to the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> site or Half Tide Tug Harbour to reduce the<br />

transport of oversize loads to the port.<br />

The impact of an increase in traffic will be considered as part of the EIS process.<br />

How is the increased traffic on Hay <strong>Point</strong> Road going to be managed once the proposed <strong>Dudgeon</strong><br />

<strong>Point</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> <strong>Terminals</strong> are operational?<br />

When construction has been completed <strong>and</strong> coal exports started, a workforce of operational <strong>and</strong><br />

maintenance staff (around 640 after all three stages per terminal have been completed) will be employed<br />

or contracted at the terminals. It is anticipated that these workers will live in the local region. They will<br />

enter the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> site through the new port road that will be next to the rail line into the site.<br />

Will Bally Keel Road be the main access route for <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong>?<br />

The main access road to <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> will be through a new road built by NQBP near the Bensons<br />

Road/Hay <strong>Point</strong> Road intersection. NQBP proposes to build a haul road into the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> site as<br />

part of the first site works, which will greatly minimise the use of Bally Keel Road, except for the very<br />

initial earthworks.<br />

Bally Keel Road will only be available to emergency services as an alternative entry site in the event of<br />

an emergency situation.<br />

Why are the rail lines into <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> going over Hay <strong>Point</strong> Road?<br />

A flat entry for a full train length (two kilometres) into the rail unloading station is required because the<br />

trains need to move slowly <strong>and</strong> controlled through the unloading station. Due to the higher elevations of<br />

the site in the unloading area, this places the rail line at an elevation well above Hay <strong>Point</strong> Road.<br />

The rail lines will be on a rail overpass over Hay <strong>Point</strong> Road to prevent disruptions to Hay <strong>Point</strong> Road.<br />

Eight rail lines are proposed over the road – six into <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>and</strong> two departure lines. A clearance<br />

of eight metres will be required to allow for the transportation of large equipment to the existing<br />

terminals.<br />

Page | 8


Will the entrance/exit to Timberl<strong>and</strong>s be upgraded with the proposed rail overpass being<br />

constructed?<br />

The entrance to Timberl<strong>and</strong>s is well distanced from the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> road <strong>and</strong> rail location into the<br />

port. However, consideration is being given to provision of turning lanes into the Timberl<strong>and</strong>s entrance<br />

road from the west <strong>and</strong> the east to enhance safety for Timberl<strong>and</strong>s residents <strong>and</strong> visitors.<br />

How will be the Bruce Highway be affected?<br />

The Bruce Highway between Mackay <strong>and</strong> the Hay <strong>Point</strong> Road intersection is currently being upgraded<br />

<strong>and</strong> it will have sufficient capacity for the expected increase in traffic from the construction activities.<br />

The Department of Transport <strong>and</strong> Main Roads has announced construction of a roundabout at the<br />

intersection of the Bruce Highway <strong>and</strong> Hay <strong>Point</strong> Road which will be completed before commencement<br />

of construction activities. This roundabout will manage the expected increase in traffic at this intersection<br />

during the construction period.<br />

Additional traffic on the highway will be minimised by transporting construction workers from Mackay <strong>and</strong><br />

Sarina by bus.<br />

Shipping<br />

What is the expected increase in shipping numbers?<br />

The Port of Hay <strong>Point</strong> has h<strong>and</strong>led up to 1100 ships in a year. The <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Project</strong> will increase<br />

ship numbers through the port, increasing in number as the various stages of development occur on the<br />

site.<br />

Under the expected moderate growth scenario (PGM, 2013) which is the most likely scenario, shipping<br />

in the ship is expected to reach 1530 ships by 2020, 2125 ships by 2025 <strong>and</strong> 2380 ships by 2032. This<br />

represents only an average of 6-7 ships per day leaving the port in twenty years’ time.<br />

What controls will there be over shipping?<br />

Commercial shipping has been occurring in the Great Barrier Reef area for more than 100 years.<br />

Commercial shipping is highly regulated by International, Commonwealth, State <strong>and</strong> local regulations<br />

<strong>and</strong> reef-specific policies.<br />

A Reef VTS (reef vessel traffic service) actively monitors the movement of all ships through the entire<br />

Great Barrier Reef region 24 hours a day, 7 days per week – via m<strong>and</strong>atory reporting protocols<br />

(automatically sent from ships to the Reef VTS centre).<br />

What is the anticipated impact of the expansion of shipping lanes/channels?<br />

Master planning studies have indicated that the existing departure path does not need to be widened.<br />

Deepening of the departure path is not proposed, but may be required at some later date to<br />

accommodate increasing larger ships using the port.<br />

Will the tug harbour continue to be open to the public during the construction phase?<br />

Yes. The tug harbour contains the public boat ramp <strong>and</strong> associated parking facilities <strong>and</strong> these will be<br />

maintained throughout any development work.<br />

Page | 9


Property<br />

Will the government or NQBP buy properties affected by dust <strong>and</strong> noise?<br />

NQBP is continuing to voluntarily purchase properties at Louisa Creek which commenced 15 years ago.<br />

However, NQBP has no plans to extend a house buy-back scheme to any other area around the port.<br />

Are properties going to be resumed by the State Government?<br />

NQBP owns sufficient l<strong>and</strong> (around 1400 hectares) at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> to carry out the development of the<br />

proposed new terminals at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> without resumption of properties. In addition, NQBP already<br />

owns a transport corridor approximately 6 kilometres long <strong>and</strong> 70-90 metres wide which runs adjacent to<br />

the Fenechvale Estate area to <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong>.<br />

The proposed rail route through Fenechvale will require significant excavation in some of the elevated<br />

hilly areas. To accommodate this, it is anticipated that a limited amount of l<strong>and</strong> along the corridor will<br />

need to be purchased or resumed. The affected l<strong>and</strong>owners will be consulted as part of the EIS<br />

consultation process. No houses will be affected by the l<strong>and</strong> requirements as the cuttings occur in<br />

pastoral areas.<br />

What is the extent of the buffer zones separating the development from communities?<br />

The 2010 Hay <strong>Point</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Use Plan designates significant buffer areas around the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong><br />

development. The Hay <strong>Point</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Use Plan can be accessed at www.nqbp.com.au.<br />

In the Timberl<strong>and</strong>s area, the separation between the closest rail line <strong>and</strong> the closest house is<br />

approximately 300 metres. The development proposes to use vegetated earth mounds between this<br />

traffic corridor <strong>and</strong> Timberl<strong>and</strong>s to minimise noise <strong>and</strong> minimise amenity impacts for residents such that<br />

the trains are not visible to residents.<br />

Is NQBP going to buy more properties to buffer port activities?<br />

NQBP does not have any current plans to purchase additional properties as a buffer to port activities<br />

because of the extensive buffer areas designated around the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> development in the L<strong>and</strong><br />

Use Plan. NQBP, however, will continue its voluntary buy-back scheme at Louisa Creek which has been<br />

in place for fifteen years.<br />

Accommodation Village<br />

Why is a construction workforce accommodation village required?<br />

For expansions undertaken of the existing coal terminals in the port, most of the construction workforce<br />

was sourced locally <strong>and</strong> already lived in the Mackay/Sarina region. The current HPX3 expansion of<br />

HPCT has been managed with a very low number of FIFO construction workers. A similar situation is<br />

expected to occur for construction of the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> <strong>Terminals</strong>. If only one terminal is<br />

constructed at once, it is similarly expected that few FIFO construction workers will be required <strong>and</strong><br />

accommodation impacts will be low. Accommodation villages approved or planned in Mackay <strong>and</strong> Sarina<br />

would likely be sufficient for this small number of FIFO workers.<br />

Page | 10


However, construction of two terminals could occur at the same time during some stage of the site<br />

development. In this instance, some workers may need to be brought in from other Queensl<strong>and</strong> areas<br />

where unemployment is higher (such as Cairns, Brisbane, Gold Coast etc.), to supplement the local<br />

workforce. If an accommodation village was not provided, this would place regional housing under<br />

significant pressure, forcing an increase in house prices <strong>and</strong> rentals, which affect the most vulnerable in<br />

the community. A temporary workers’ accommodation village is therefore required to accommodate<br />

workers flying or driving in from other regions.<br />

If an Accommodation village is required, where will it be sited?<br />

A village is proposed in the Louisa Creek area if two terminals are under construction at the same time. It<br />

is set on a 100 acre lot of NQBP l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> it maintains wide buffers from any neighbouring residents. The<br />

village will be designed to minimise visual impacts by being set behind an existing line of vegetation line<br />

<strong>and</strong> by having a high st<strong>and</strong>ard of finish to the site, including l<strong>and</strong>scaping. It is proposed to set up a<br />

management committee for the village to include police, council <strong>and</strong> local residents to provide feedback<br />

to the village operators to minimise impacts on the local community.<br />

How will a village impact on nearby residents?<br />

Construction villages will cater to both male <strong>and</strong> female construction workers. Villages will provide<br />

recreational facilities for its village residents such as gyms, swimming pools etc. <strong>and</strong> provide full mess<br />

facilities. Construction workers are in dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> they expect a high st<strong>and</strong>ard of facilities. Villages also<br />

set a high st<strong>and</strong>ard of behaviour for its village residents <strong>and</strong> usually have a “one strike <strong>and</strong> you’re out<br />

policy”. Eviction from the village would normally result in loss of employment, so village residents are<br />

well behaved.<br />

Fishing, Recreation <strong>and</strong> Community<br />

Will there be extra wide jetty spans on the new jetties? Will this allow access to <strong>and</strong> from Louisa<br />

Creek?<br />

The new jetty structures for <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> are expected to be similar in size to the current jetty at<br />

DBCT. It is proposed to provide a single designated passageway under each of the new jetty structures<br />

that lead to the offshore wharves at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong>. The designated passageway would have lighting<br />

<strong>and</strong> safeguards installed to prevent objects falling from above. The passageway would be 22 metres<br />

wide <strong>and</strong> have a clearance of 10-16 metres between high <strong>and</strong> low tide, which will be adequate to allow<br />

passage of recreational fishing craft.<br />

These new arrangements, however, cannot be applied to the existing jetties in the port because they<br />

have not been designed for vessels to pass under them without some risk to the boaties.<br />

Will it still be possible to fish in the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> area <strong>and</strong> around Porters Creek <strong>and</strong><br />

S<strong>and</strong>ringham Bay?<br />

Access to S<strong>and</strong>ringham Bay, Porters Creek <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> headl<strong>and</strong> will not be affected by the<br />

proposed development of coal terminals at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong>. There is no offshore infrastructure located in<br />

these areas.<br />

The proposed development of the <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> <strong>Coal</strong> <strong>Terminals</strong> would only limit access to areas<br />

around the proposed terminals, marine offloading facilities <strong>and</strong> offshore infrastructure.<br />

Page | 11


What effect will the jetty have on tidal movement in S<strong>and</strong>ringham Bay?<br />

Water moves smoothly around the pilings of jetties <strong>and</strong> does not impede water flow or change sediment<br />

movement.<br />

Will the development cause more erosion of the beach at McEwens Beach <strong>and</strong> is this erosion<br />

related to dredging activities at the Port of Hay <strong>Point</strong>?<br />

Erosion of McEwens Beach is a naturally occurring event <strong>and</strong> is similar to coastal erosion occurring<br />

along the whole Queensl<strong>and</strong> coast. Government regulations now prohibit new development within<br />

several hundred metres of Queensl<strong>and</strong> coastlines because of this natural phenomenon. S<strong>and</strong> movement<br />

in the McEwens Beach area <strong>and</strong> other local beachfront areas has taken place for decades.<br />

Dredging of the departure path at Hay <strong>Point</strong> is a recent occurrence, commencing in 2006 <strong>and</strong> is not<br />

related to any issues at McEwens Beach. The departure path is located well offshore <strong>and</strong> the offshore<br />

currents move north following the coast, well distanced from McEwens Beach.<br />

Will the proposed stockpiles at <strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> be visible from McEwens Beach?<br />

<strong>Dudgeon</strong> <strong>Point</strong> is around 4 km from McEwens Beach <strong>and</strong> is visible in the distance. The stockpiles will be<br />

partially visible from McEwens Beach, with the degree of visibility depending on the atmospheric<br />

conditions. Trees will be planted to visually screen the stockyard from residents’ view to reduce any<br />

amenity impact. Drawings of the expected views from community viewpoints were provided to Port of<br />

Hay <strong>Point</strong> Community Reference Group members at the May 2013 meeting.<br />

For further project information:<br />

Email: info@nqbp.com.au<br />

Phone: Justine Thorp on (07) 4969 0730<br />

Page | 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!