17.11.2014 Views

Some Notes on Form and Function of the Line and Line Endings in ...

Some Notes on Form and Function of the Line and Line Endings in ...

Some Notes on Form and Function of the Line and Line Endings in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Some</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Notes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Form</strong> <strong>and</strong> Functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>End<strong>in</strong>gs</strong> <strong>in</strong> Free-Verse Poetry<br />

by T<strong>on</strong>y Leuzzi<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>cti<strong>on</strong> between prose <strong>and</strong> verse is that prose is not sensitive to l<strong>in</strong>es whereas verse<br />

is all about <strong>the</strong> form, shape, length, <strong>and</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es. These <strong>in</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>s, for example, are<br />

written <strong>in</strong> prose; <strong>the</strong>refore, each l<strong>in</strong>e has <strong>on</strong>ly stopped <strong>and</strong> carried over <strong>in</strong>to ano<strong>the</strong>r because <strong>the</strong><br />

horiz<strong>on</strong>tal space <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> page has run out. If this paper were twice as wide, <strong>the</strong>se l<strong>in</strong>es would be<br />

doubled <strong>in</strong> width. In verse poems, however, each l<strong>in</strong>e is carefully crafted so that <strong>the</strong> empty spaces<br />

<strong>on</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> words also communicate mean<strong>in</strong>g. Hopefully, <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g essay will help<br />

clarify some ways <strong>in</strong> which l<strong>in</strong>es allow mean<strong>in</strong>g to take shape <strong>in</strong> poems.<br />

I. <strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong>s are Everywhere: Pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, Architecture, Poems<br />

What is a l<strong>in</strong>e? In pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, architecture, <strong>and</strong> music, <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>the</strong> most basic material through<br />

which any auditory or visual artifact is created. Given this scope, it would seem l<strong>in</strong>es are<br />

everywhere. Look<strong>in</strong>g at a house, <strong>on</strong>e sees a wooden or c<strong>on</strong>crete structure patterned <strong>on</strong> carefully<br />

ordered angles <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es. A v<strong>in</strong>e might scale that house <strong>in</strong> a l<strong>on</strong>g, w<strong>and</strong>er<strong>in</strong>g pattern across its<br />

wall. The letters or written symbols <strong>in</strong> this essay are <strong>the</strong>mselves formed by l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> different<br />

shapes <strong>and</strong> sizes. In fact, <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly place l<strong>in</strong>es would not exist is <strong>in</strong> negative space, or a void.<br />

If l<strong>in</strong>es are ubiquitous, <strong>the</strong>y are essential to underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> pattern <strong>and</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> auditory <strong>and</strong><br />

visual artifacts. Many <strong>of</strong> Picasso’s most famous pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs feature deliberately crude, thick l<strong>in</strong>es to<br />

create deceptively primitive images, suggest<strong>in</strong>g mythic c<strong>on</strong>notati<strong>on</strong>s while corresp<strong>on</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

c<strong>on</strong>temporary experience. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, Matisse’s pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs exploit graceful l<strong>in</strong>es to suggest<br />

a flow<strong>in</strong>g, musical lyricism that also speaks to an aspect <strong>of</strong> our experience.<br />

<strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong>s occur <strong>in</strong> architecture, too. The functi<strong>on</strong>al, box-shaped build<strong>in</strong>gs at MCC <strong>and</strong> RIT c<strong>on</strong>trast<br />

sharply with <strong>the</strong> dramatic, curvaceous l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> an Eastern Orthodox Church downtown. Aga<strong>in</strong>, no<br />

particular pattern is necessarily better than ano<strong>the</strong>r simply because it’s different. Value can be<br />

ascribed by <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> a build<strong>in</strong>g serve (or fail to serve) <strong>the</strong><br />

purposes for which <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g was designed 1 .<br />

1


In poetry, l<strong>in</strong>es take <strong>on</strong> various shapes <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g vary<strong>in</strong>g effects. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Some</str<strong>on</strong>g> express sweep<strong>in</strong>g vastness,<br />

as <strong>in</strong> Walt Whitman’s l<strong>in</strong>es, or cryptic compressi<strong>on</strong>, as seen <strong>in</strong> poems by Emily Dick<strong>in</strong>s<strong>on</strong>. For<br />

example, Walt Whitman writes:<br />

Throb, baffled <strong>and</strong> curious bra<strong>in</strong>! Throw out questi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>and</strong> answers!<br />

Suspend here <strong>and</strong> everywhere, eternal float <strong>of</strong> soluti<strong>on</strong>!<br />

These l<strong>on</strong>g, flow<strong>in</strong>g, all-<strong>in</strong>clusive l<strong>in</strong>es reflect Whitman’s c<strong>on</strong>cern with embrac<strong>in</strong>g all <strong>the</strong><br />

elements <strong>of</strong> our percepti<strong>on</strong>. Walt Whitman’s l<strong>in</strong>es were so wide that <strong>the</strong> first editi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> his book,<br />

Leaves <strong>of</strong> Grass, was published <strong>on</strong> oversized paper. By c<strong>on</strong>trast, Emily Dick<strong>in</strong>s<strong>on</strong> writes:<br />

It would have starved a Gnat—<br />

To live so small as I—<br />

These compressed l<strong>in</strong>es echo <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a’s <strong>in</strong>troverted psychological world-view <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

support <strong>the</strong> idea that <strong>the</strong> self should be seen as small. Twentieth-Century poet, William Carlos<br />

Williams also wrote small, narrow poems. Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reas<strong>on</strong> for this was that, as a doctor, he<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten traveled from house to house, writ<strong>in</strong>g poems <strong>on</strong> a prescripti<strong>on</strong> pad. “The Red<br />

Wheelbarrow,” <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> his most famous poems, could easily fit <strong>on</strong> a note pad, <strong>and</strong> <strong>on</strong>e can see<br />

how <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper might have determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem:<br />

so much depends<br />

up<strong>on</strong><br />

a red wheel<br />

barrow<br />

glazed with ra<strong>in</strong><br />

water<br />

beside <strong>the</strong> white<br />

chickens.<br />

But d<strong>on</strong>’t let this case fool you. A l<strong>in</strong>e’s length is not always determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper<br />

it is pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>on</strong>; ra<strong>the</strong>r, it is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> specific purposes any l<strong>in</strong>e length serves. In<br />

Williams’s case, his t<strong>in</strong>y, compressed poems are <strong>the</strong> perfect vehicle for clipped, crisp images that<br />

bear no explicit commentary.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Some</str<strong>on</strong>g> writers like to vary l<strong>in</strong>e lengths for dramatic effect:<br />

2


A man looks to his wife for an answer.<br />

“Will you love me like you love <strong>the</strong> daughter you say I never gave you?”<br />

“No.”<br />

The c<strong>on</strong>trast <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e length reveals a different psychological state for <strong>the</strong> man (l<strong>in</strong>e 2) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

woman (l<strong>in</strong>e 3) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem. The man’s rambl<strong>in</strong>g answer suggests his <strong>in</strong>security. Clearly he is<br />

eager to make c<strong>on</strong>versati<strong>on</strong> with <strong>the</strong> woman, but her terse resp<strong>on</strong>se reflects her dismissal. She has<br />

closed all discussi<strong>on</strong> with her m<strong>on</strong>osyllabic answer.<br />

So far we’ve seen that a particular l<strong>in</strong>e break can highlight a gesture or effect with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger<br />

unit <strong>of</strong> any given sentence. It can also emphasize certa<strong>in</strong> associati<strong>on</strong>s between words. Moreover<br />

each l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> a poem must be c<strong>on</strong>sidered <strong>in</strong> two ways: 1.) On its own as a s<strong>in</strong>gle unit <strong>of</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2.) In its relati<strong>on</strong>ship(s) to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem.<br />

II. The Sentence is Not <strong>the</strong> <strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />

It is important to know that l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> sentences are not always <strong>on</strong>e <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> same. If all l<strong>in</strong>e breaks<br />

were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by sentence end<strong>in</strong>gs, poets would not be able to express certa<strong>in</strong> ideas that can be<br />

suggested by fus<strong>in</strong>g ideas <strong>and</strong> phrases toge<strong>the</strong>r. Each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es (<strong>in</strong> a self-composed<br />

poem called “On Tuesday”) breaks <strong>of</strong>f when a s<strong>in</strong>gle sentence is ended:<br />

I get a message from her.<br />

I turn <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> radio.<br />

The toilet is leak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Presented <strong>in</strong> this way, <strong>the</strong>se three l<strong>in</strong>es seem not <strong>on</strong>ly unremarkable, but disc<strong>on</strong>nected to each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r, suggest<strong>in</strong>g at best a r<strong>and</strong>om rout<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> speaker’s life. However, when <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es are<br />

rearranged, a new subtext emerges:<br />

I get a message<br />

from her. I turn <strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> radio. The toilet<br />

is leak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d l<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> previously neutral statement “I turn <strong>on</strong>” now seems to be associated with<br />

“her” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous sentence, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> female pr<strong>on</strong>oun is carried <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> same l<strong>in</strong>e as “I turn<br />

<strong>on</strong>.” Similarly, <strong>the</strong> radio <strong>and</strong> toilet are yoked toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e three, creat<strong>in</strong>g a not-so-subtle<br />

statement about <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> radio programm<strong>in</strong>g. Therefore, through its clever l<strong>in</strong>e breaks, this<br />

3


poem has transcended <strong>the</strong> banal. Likewise, Mary Oliver <strong>of</strong>ten uses l<strong>in</strong>e breaks to transform<br />

seem<strong>in</strong>gly unexcepti<strong>on</strong>al observati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong>to brilliant poetic utterances. One <strong>of</strong> her early poems,<br />

“Farm Country,” illustrates some aspects <strong>of</strong> her approach:<br />

I have sharpened <strong>the</strong> knives, I have<br />

Put <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> heavy apr<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Maybe you th<strong>in</strong>k life is chicken soup, served<br />

In blue willow-pattern bowls.<br />

I have put <strong>on</strong> my boots <strong>and</strong> opened<br />

The kitchen door <strong>and</strong> stepped out<br />

Into <strong>the</strong> sunsh<strong>in</strong>e. I have crossed <strong>the</strong> lawn,<br />

I have entered<br />

The hen house.<br />

The first th<strong>in</strong>g a perceptive reader might notice <strong>in</strong> this poem is <strong>the</strong> way many <strong>of</strong> its l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

occur at unexpected or even awkward po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence. This c<strong>on</strong>spicuous<br />

organizati<strong>on</strong> suggests <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es were <strong>in</strong>tenti<strong>on</strong>ally broken this way to yield specific results. For<br />

<strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial l<strong>in</strong>e, “I have sharpened <strong>the</strong> knives,” is followed by <strong>the</strong> reiterative phrase “I<br />

have” which—though grammatically l<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e two—is reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>on</strong><br />

l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>on</strong>e to emphasize <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a’s blunt declarati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong>, by extensi<strong>on</strong>, her determ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> 2 .<br />

Taken <strong>on</strong> its own, <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d l<strong>in</strong>e is a short <strong>and</strong> clear directive that fur<strong>the</strong>r underscores <strong>the</strong> t<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> poem’s purposed, no-n<strong>on</strong>sense voice. In <strong>the</strong> third l<strong>in</strong>e, “Maybe you th<strong>in</strong>k life is chicken soup,<br />

served,” <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al word would be, <strong>in</strong> normal speech patterns, l<strong>in</strong>ked rhythmically to <strong>the</strong> group<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> words <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fourth l<strong>in</strong>e. Here, however, it is reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> third l<strong>in</strong>e to emphasize <strong>the</strong> image<br />

<strong>of</strong> some<strong>on</strong>e be<strong>in</strong>g served—an image that is central to <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a’s argument: after all, to th<strong>in</strong>k<br />

life is a bowl <strong>of</strong> chicken soup is <strong>on</strong>e th<strong>in</strong>g; to th<strong>in</strong>k that same bowl <strong>of</strong> chicken soup will be served<br />

to you without work<strong>in</strong>g for it is ano<strong>the</strong>r. The stress <strong>on</strong> “served” c<strong>on</strong>sciously changes <strong>the</strong> rhythm<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence <strong>and</strong>, fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, sets <strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poetic voice apart from whomever <strong>the</strong><br />

pers<strong>on</strong>a is address<strong>in</strong>g. This unique tensi<strong>on</strong> between speaker <strong>and</strong> audience is made evident through<br />

<strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e break.<br />

Elsewhere, o<strong>the</strong>r l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>gs are similarly effective <strong>in</strong> communicat<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>on</strong>notati<strong>on</strong>s that might<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise go undetected. In <strong>the</strong> fifth l<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a states:<br />

“I have put <strong>on</strong> my boots <strong>and</strong> opened”<br />

4


“Opened what?” <strong>on</strong>e asks. While <strong>the</strong> sixth l<strong>in</strong>e will provide this <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> break itself<br />

suggests that “opened” is more than literal. The pers<strong>on</strong>a’s decisi<strong>on</strong> to put <strong>on</strong> her boots <strong>and</strong> exit<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terior <strong>of</strong> her home suggests an altered psychological state, an open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sciousness.<br />

This noti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> altered c<strong>on</strong>sciousness is reiterated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> eighth l<strong>in</strong>e when, after hav<strong>in</strong>g stepped<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> sunsh<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> crossed <strong>the</strong> lawn, <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a says, “I have entered.” No spatial or physical<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators are provided, <strong>and</strong> this much shorter l<strong>in</strong>e than <strong>the</strong> rest is left largely blank. Then, after a<br />

stanza break, ano<strong>the</strong>r brief l<strong>in</strong>e closes <strong>the</strong> poem. The negative space between <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al two l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

creates <strong>the</strong>re a c<strong>on</strong>spicuous chasm that <strong>in</strong>dicates a psychological shift from <strong>on</strong>e state <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d to<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

The discussi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Mary Oliver’s “Farm Country” dem<strong>on</strong>strates <strong>the</strong> “systematic c<strong>on</strong>trast or<br />

oppositi<strong>on</strong> between l<strong>in</strong>e units <strong>and</strong> sense units”—or l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> sentence flow (Brogan 695).<br />

This verse-specific phenomen<strong>on</strong>, known as enjambment, will be discussed at more length <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

secti<strong>on</strong> below. However, it is important to note that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal shape <strong>and</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> any given l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

is fur<strong>the</strong>r complicated <strong>in</strong> its relati<strong>on</strong>ship to <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>and</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence, which may or may<br />

not corresp<strong>on</strong>d to <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e. Therefore, “<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chief functi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e divisi<strong>on</strong> is to st<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

tensi<strong>on</strong> or counterpo<strong>in</strong>t to <strong>the</strong> divisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> grammar <strong>and</strong> sense, effect<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> reader’s<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> text, multiple simultaneous pattern recogniti<strong>on</strong>” (695). The excerpt from David<br />

St. John’s poem, “Iris,” fur<strong>the</strong>r illustrates this c<strong>on</strong>cept:<br />

The prairies fail al<strong>on</strong>g Chicago. Past <strong>the</strong> five<br />

Lakes. Into <strong>the</strong> black woods <strong>of</strong> her New York; <strong>and</strong> as I bend<br />

Close above this iris, I see <strong>the</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><br />

Drive deep <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> damp heart <strong>of</strong> its stem, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> gravel<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> garden path<br />

Cracks under my feet as I walk this l<strong>on</strong>g corridor<br />

Of elms, arched<br />

Like <strong>the</strong> ceil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a French railway where a boy<br />

With pale curls hold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

A fresh iris is wav<strong>in</strong>g goodbye to a gr<strong>and</strong>mo<strong>the</strong>r, gaz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

A l<strong>on</strong>g time<br />

Into <strong>the</strong> flower . . .<br />

5


As menti<strong>on</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> brief analyses <strong>of</strong> Oliver’s “Farm Country” <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> self-penned poem, <strong>the</strong><br />

arrangement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se l<strong>in</strong>es exacts, with regards to form, two levels <strong>of</strong> comprehensi<strong>on</strong>: <strong>the</strong> shape<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> a sentence. Each l<strong>in</strong>e can be understood discreetly, <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual units <strong>of</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g, such as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e “A fresh iris is wav<strong>in</strong>g goodbye to a gr<strong>and</strong>mo<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

gaz<strong>in</strong>g”—which suggests that <strong>the</strong> iris is wav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>n gaz<strong>in</strong>g, not <strong>the</strong> boy <strong>of</strong> two l<strong>in</strong>es previous.<br />

But it would be <strong>in</strong>correct to ignore <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence, too. Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complex richness <strong>of</strong><br />

poems such as St. John’s “Iris” is <strong>the</strong> way l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>gs create sec<strong>on</strong>dary rhythms that are<br />

superimposed <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> rhythms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentences. The reader’s <strong>in</strong>terpretati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> pauses, emphases,<br />

<strong>and</strong> pitches <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es “…<strong>and</strong> as I bend/Close above this iris, I see <strong>the</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>/Drive deep <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />

damp heart <strong>of</strong> its stem, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> gravel/<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> garden path/Cracks under my feet…” will depend<br />

up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>on</strong>e h<strong>on</strong>ors <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> comparis<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> sentence. Will<br />

<strong>on</strong>e, for example, read “Close above this iris, I see <strong>the</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>” <strong>in</strong> a ris<strong>in</strong>g or fall<strong>in</strong>g t<strong>on</strong>e? The<br />

answer will depend <strong>on</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>in</strong>terpreted as <strong>the</strong> latter half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> compound<br />

sentence it is l<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous l<strong>in</strong>e or as an <strong>in</strong>dividual unit <strong>of</strong> communicati<strong>on</strong> that<br />

anticipates more c<strong>on</strong>text <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next l<strong>in</strong>e. The reader is c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ually negotiat<strong>in</strong>g between <strong>the</strong> two<br />

levels, where <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> rhythms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence are <strong>of</strong>ten c<strong>on</strong>trasted to <strong>and</strong>/or augmented<br />

by <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e-sensitive arrangement. And as Brogan fur<strong>the</strong>r notes, when read<strong>in</strong>g enjambed verse,<br />

“<strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d makes projecti<strong>on</strong>s . . . based <strong>on</strong> what has come before [<strong>and</strong>] what word is most likely to<br />

appear at <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> next l<strong>in</strong>e” (695).<br />

III: K<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> <strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong> Breaks: Terms <strong>and</strong> Examples<br />

As <strong>the</strong> previous secti<strong>on</strong> dem<strong>on</strong>strated, an astute reader can detect two ways <strong>of</strong> ascerta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sense<br />

<strong>in</strong> a poem: <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e. The follow<strong>in</strong>g passage from<br />

Corr<strong>in</strong>e Hales’s poem, “Power,” where two children place a stuffed effigy <strong>on</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>-tracks, fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

dem<strong>on</strong>strates this c<strong>on</strong>cept.<br />

The shirt <strong>and</strong> pants looked real enough<br />

Stretched out across <strong>the</strong> rails. I felt my heart<br />

Beat<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> cool ground . . .<br />

This three-l<strong>in</strong>e passage c<strong>on</strong>veys clear <strong>and</strong> literal <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> two grammatically complete<br />

sentences. But <strong>the</strong> yok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> two phrases (<strong>on</strong>e from each sentence) <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

communicates a deeper psychological truth. “Stretched out across <strong>the</strong> rails. I felt my heart”<br />

suggests that, <strong>on</strong> a metaphorical level, <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a as well as <strong>the</strong> effigy is stretched out across <strong>the</strong><br />

rails wait<strong>in</strong>g to be run over by a tra<strong>in</strong>. Perhaps, <strong>the</strong>n, she is say<strong>in</strong>g that a part <strong>of</strong> her will die when<br />

6


<strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong> runs over <strong>the</strong> joke she <strong>and</strong> her bro<strong>the</strong>r created for this occasi<strong>on</strong>. This <strong>in</strong>sight is<br />

c<strong>on</strong>firmed later when, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al stanza, <strong>the</strong> narrator admits “morn<strong>in</strong>g seemed too l<strong>on</strong>g ago.” She<br />

is not <strong>the</strong> same pers<strong>on</strong> she was before. With <strong>the</strong> aid <strong>of</strong> a deft l<strong>in</strong>e break, this abstract<br />

transformati<strong>on</strong> is made c<strong>on</strong>crete.<br />

Different k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e breaks <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> end-stopped l<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> reflexive l<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> enjambed l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

end<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> anticipatory l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> transformati<strong>on</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> endstopped<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> writer decides to stop <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e when s/he’s f<strong>in</strong>ished with a sentence or phrase.<br />

The effect is <strong>of</strong>ten logical <strong>and</strong> tidy, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> pause that ensues after <strong>the</strong> end-stopped l<strong>in</strong>e is as full<br />

as <strong>the</strong> pause <strong>on</strong>e makes at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> a sentence. Charles Simic's witty poem, "Charles Simic,"<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>s with end-stopped l<strong>in</strong>es:<br />

Charles Simic is a sentence.<br />

A sentence has a beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> an end.<br />

The end-stoped, full-sentenced l<strong>in</strong>es are appropriate for this poem because <strong>the</strong>y dem<strong>on</strong>strate <strong>the</strong><br />

very c<strong>on</strong>tent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem through <strong>the</strong> choice <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>gs. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, if <strong>the</strong> poem is<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cerned with sentences about Charles Simic, it would seem logical that <strong>the</strong>se very sentences<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> choice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Here is a sample <strong>of</strong> two l<strong>in</strong>es from a poem called “I Advertised for a Part-Time Job,” by Kathleen<br />

Idd<strong>in</strong>gs:<br />

I took a job <strong>in</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fice,<br />

$6.00 an hour.<br />

Each l<strong>in</strong>e provides essential <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong>, which is clear <strong>on</strong> its own but even more effective when<br />

seen <strong>in</strong> relati<strong>on</strong> to <strong>on</strong>e ano<strong>the</strong>r. In this case, <strong>the</strong> first end-stopped l<strong>in</strong>e sets up an expectati<strong>on</strong> that is<br />

undercut by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> provided <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next l<strong>in</strong>e. A job <strong>in</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fice might be c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />

respectable <strong>and</strong> lucrative, but not for such a low wage. This effect is called <strong>the</strong>sis-anti<strong>the</strong>sis,<br />

which works well with end-stopped l<strong>in</strong>es, where <strong>on</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>e will deflate or c<strong>on</strong>tradict an expectati<strong>on</strong><br />

established <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Employ<strong>in</strong>g an un<strong>in</strong>terrupted sequence <strong>of</strong> end-stopped l<strong>in</strong>es may also be an effective way to<br />

establish t<strong>on</strong>e. Anne Sext<strong>on</strong> does this <strong>in</strong> her famous poem "Man <strong>and</strong> Wife," which <strong>of</strong>fers its<br />

wi<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g commentary <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> marriage primarily though <strong>the</strong> dull, numb<strong>in</strong>g t<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> man <strong>and</strong> wife <strong>the</strong>mselves:<br />

7


We are not lovers.<br />

We do not even know each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

We look alike<br />

but we have noth<strong>in</strong>g to say.<br />

We are like pige<strong>on</strong>s . . .<br />

The man <strong>and</strong> wife speak simply, directly though <strong>in</strong> entirely un<strong>in</strong>spired end-stopped sentences or<br />

phrases which dramatize <strong>the</strong> m<strong>on</strong>ot<strong>on</strong>ous, rout<strong>in</strong>e aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir existence.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Some</str<strong>on</strong>g>times an end-stopped l<strong>in</strong>e is reflexive, mean<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g refers to someth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

previously <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore forces <strong>the</strong> reader to move backward as well as forward (Myers<br />

<strong>and</strong> Simms 163-64). Here’s a l<strong>in</strong>e from a poem by Richard Hugo:<br />

My eyes were like this photo. Old.<br />

Note that <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e has been end-stopped, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore closed, but reflexivity forces <strong>the</strong> reader to<br />

move <strong>in</strong> two directi<strong>on</strong>s. “Old” will <strong>on</strong>ly make sense if <strong>the</strong> reader l<strong>in</strong>ks it with <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> that<br />

preceded it—eyes <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> photo. Likewise, <strong>the</strong> eyes become old <strong>on</strong>ly when <strong>the</strong> reader has<br />

reached <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>the</strong>reby forc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong>e to return to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial reference <strong>and</strong> create a new<br />

associati<strong>on</strong>: eyes/old.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enjambed l<strong>in</strong>e, a l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g is not stopped at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> a sentence or<br />

grammatically complete phrase. Instead, <strong>the</strong> sentence or phrase carries over <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> next l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Here is a group <strong>of</strong> enjambed l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> a poem called “A Small S<strong>on</strong>g,” by A. R. Amm<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

The reeds give<br />

way to <strong>the</strong><br />

w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>and</strong> give<br />

<strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d away.<br />

All four l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> this little poem could have been arranged <strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>e, but <strong>the</strong> effect would have<br />

been different.<br />

The reeds give way to <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>and</strong> give <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d away.<br />

8


In <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial example, <strong>the</strong> broken l<strong>in</strong>es at <strong>on</strong>ce emphasize certa<strong>in</strong> word pairs <strong>in</strong> each l<strong>in</strong>e (reeds<br />

give, way to, w<strong>in</strong>d give, w<strong>in</strong>d away) but force <strong>the</strong> reader to recognize a pr<strong>on</strong>ounced anticipati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

“The reeds give” what? “Way to <strong>the</strong>” what? If <strong>the</strong> entire sentence appeared <strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> sense<br />

<strong>of</strong> word associati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> anticipati<strong>on</strong> would be n<strong>on</strong>-apparent.<br />

End-stopped <strong>and</strong> enjambed l<strong>in</strong>es can be characterized <strong>in</strong> three ma<strong>in</strong> ways: anticipatory,<br />

transformati<strong>on</strong>al, <strong>and</strong> emphatic. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to The L<strong>on</strong>gman Dicti<strong>on</strong>ary <strong>of</strong> Poetic Terms, <strong>the</strong><br />

anticipatory l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g does exactly what is says: creates anticipati<strong>on</strong> or suspense by “hold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

back or delay<strong>in</strong>g ei<strong>the</strong>r syntax or sense necessary to <strong>the</strong> complete underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a sentence”<br />

(Myers <strong>and</strong> Simms 165). As a result, “<strong>the</strong> last word <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e is meant to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> reader’s<br />

curiosity” (165). The aforementi<strong>on</strong>ed "Charles Simic" poem illustrates this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple perfectly:<br />

What is <strong>the</strong> object <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence?<br />

The object, my little <strong>on</strong>es,<br />

Is not yet <strong>in</strong> sight.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> first l<strong>in</strong>e is end-stopped, <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d breaks significantly at <strong>the</strong> very po<strong>in</strong>t where <strong>the</strong><br />

object menti<strong>on</strong>ed might be revealed. We have to read <strong>the</strong> third l<strong>in</strong>e to f<strong>in</strong>d out. But we have been<br />

duped: <strong>the</strong> object is not yet <strong>in</strong> sight. The third l<strong>in</strong>e cleverly echoes what we already knew from<br />

<strong>the</strong> previous l<strong>in</strong>e break.<br />

Not all anticipatory l<strong>in</strong>e breaks are as deliberately frustrat<strong>in</strong>g. These l<strong>in</strong>es from Yusef<br />

Komunyakaa’s poem “Fac<strong>in</strong>g It”—where <strong>the</strong> speaker <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem sees people reflected back to<br />

him <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Vietnam Veteran’s Memorial <strong>in</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gt<strong>on</strong>—feature end-stopped <strong>and</strong> enjambed<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es. The enjambed l<strong>in</strong>es are largely anticipatory:<br />

The Sky. A plane <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sky.<br />

A white vet’s image floats<br />

Closer to me, <strong>the</strong>n his pale eyes<br />

Look through m<strong>in</strong>e. I’m a w<strong>in</strong>dow.<br />

He’s lost his right arm<br />

Inside <strong>the</strong> st<strong>on</strong>e. In <strong>the</strong> black mirror<br />

A woman’s try<strong>in</strong>g to erase names:<br />

No, she’s brush<strong>in</strong>g a boy’s hair.<br />

The first l<strong>in</strong>e is purely end-stopped, but l<strong>in</strong>es two <strong>and</strong> three dem<strong>on</strong>strate an anticipatory effect.<br />

The vivid image, “A white vet’s image floats,” deserves its own l<strong>in</strong>e, but a deeper appreciati<strong>on</strong><br />

will come with more literal <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong>. “Closer to me” suggests that <strong>the</strong> image is now not <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

float<strong>in</strong>g but is mov<strong>in</strong>g closer to <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a. This is literally reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> st<strong>on</strong>e, but figuratively<br />

9


epresentative <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong> speaker is becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>timate <strong>on</strong>ce aga<strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong> realities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> war.<br />

The l<strong>in</strong>e break here is anticipatory because it spurs <strong>the</strong> reader to reach for more <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> break is crucial because it emphasizes <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

float<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> itself—an idea that would have been lost if <strong>the</strong> break had been removed or<br />

altered.<br />

A transformati<strong>on</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g occurs <strong>in</strong> enjambed l<strong>in</strong>es where <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g or suggesti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> last word <strong>of</strong> a l<strong>in</strong>e is transformed or altered by what follows it (167). Take a look at <strong>the</strong>se:<br />

He ran as fast as a tiger<br />

with <strong>on</strong>ly three legs.<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

When she wouldn’t go out with him<br />

he climbed <strong>on</strong> top <strong>of</strong> her<br />

house <strong>and</strong> sang <strong>of</strong>f-key all night.<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

She raised her h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> slapped him<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> back, to get him to stop<br />

cough<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

He kissed his wife <strong>and</strong> his daughter<br />

moaned <strong>in</strong> disgust.<br />

An emphatic l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g usually creates a sense <strong>of</strong> emphasis or reiterati<strong>on</strong> through <strong>the</strong> repetiti<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> a word or phrase or idea (168). The follow<strong>in</strong>g example dem<strong>on</strong>strates <strong>and</strong> emphatic l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that repeats certa<strong>in</strong> words for emphasis<br />

When he was good, he was<br />

as happy as a clam.<br />

Compare this l<strong>in</strong>e to<br />

When he was good, he was as happy as a clam.<br />

10


In <strong>the</strong> first sample, <strong>the</strong> words “he was” are visually l<strong>in</strong>ked with <strong>the</strong> first four words <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e;<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong>y reiterate <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> man be<strong>in</strong>g good. This emphasis would be lost if <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

break did not appear where it does. In <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d sample, <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e ends when <strong>the</strong> sentence ends. In<br />

this case, all <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> is presented <strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>e but, ir<strong>on</strong>ically, <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> emphasis through<br />

reiterati<strong>on</strong> is lost.<br />

In his essay, "Free Verse <strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>," Jack Myers aga<strong>in</strong> expla<strong>in</strong>s that <strong>the</strong> emphatic l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g<br />

"emphasizes, re<strong>in</strong>forces, <strong>and</strong>/or restates previous c<strong>on</strong>text, <strong>of</strong>ten with new semantic <strong>and</strong> t<strong>on</strong>al<br />

effects" (183). He <strong>the</strong>n dem<strong>on</strong>strates this po<strong>in</strong>t by compar<strong>in</strong>g three sentences as <strong>the</strong>y are grouped<br />

<strong>in</strong> prose <strong>and</strong> verse. First, as prose:<br />

My readers are c<strong>on</strong>fused. They feel that more examples are necessary. They are bored <strong>and</strong> this is<br />

unfortunate.<br />

And <strong>the</strong>n, as verse:<br />

My readers are c<strong>on</strong>fused. They feel that<br />

more examples are necessary. They are<br />

bored <strong>and</strong> this is unfortunate.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> prose passage, <strong>the</strong> sentences do more than express <strong>the</strong> literal state <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> readers. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> verse versi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> emphatic l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>gs create fresh <strong>and</strong> provocative associati<strong>on</strong>s. In l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>on</strong>e,<br />

for example, <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>fusi<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> readers feel is re<strong>in</strong>forced through <strong>the</strong> positi<strong>on</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> "They feel<br />

that" <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> same l<strong>in</strong>e. In l<strong>in</strong>e two, <strong>the</strong> fact that more examples are necessary is emphatically<br />

supported by "They are," which might anticipate any rebuttal to <strong>the</strong> sentiment expressed. In l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

three, "bored" <strong>and</strong> "unfortunate" are placed <strong>in</strong> a l<strong>in</strong>e that equates <strong>the</strong> two c<strong>on</strong>cepts with each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

IV: Apply<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>Some</str<strong>on</strong>g> Terms You Have Learned:<br />

Mary Oliver’s “August”<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> terms above are employed simultaneously <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle poem to enhance its mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or music. Ano<strong>the</strong>r Mary Oliver poem, “August,” may serve as a useful example <strong>of</strong> how l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

end<strong>in</strong>gs c<strong>on</strong>tribute to <strong>the</strong> overall form <strong>and</strong> design <strong>of</strong> a free verse poem:<br />

When <strong>the</strong> blackberries hang<br />

11


swollen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> woods, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> brambles<br />

nobody owns, I spend<br />

all day am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> high<br />

branches, reach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

my ripped arms, th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> noth<strong>in</strong>g, cramm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> black h<strong>on</strong>ey <strong>of</strong> summer<br />

<strong>in</strong>to my mouth; all day my body<br />

accepts what it is. In <strong>the</strong> dark<br />

creeks that run by <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

this thick paw <strong>of</strong> my life dart<strong>in</strong>g am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> black bells, <strong>the</strong> leaves; <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

this happy t<strong>on</strong>gue.<br />

Though this poem is arranged <strong>in</strong>to fourteen l<strong>in</strong>es (perhaps a not-so-distant echo <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> s<strong>on</strong>net?) its<br />

grammatical form is comprised <strong>of</strong> two sentences broken <strong>in</strong>to smaller, enjambed l<strong>in</strong>es that<br />

maximize <strong>the</strong> poetic potential <strong>of</strong> an o<strong>the</strong>rwise somewhat prosy passage <strong>of</strong> language.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es break at a crucial moment where essential <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> is withheld. This<br />

technique is obvious <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first l<strong>in</strong>e, “When <strong>the</strong> blackberries hang.” Locati<strong>on</strong> is not provided<br />

until <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d l<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>the</strong>reby sett<strong>in</strong>g up an anticipatory l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g. But <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> withhold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

locati<strong>on</strong> does more: it fractures <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> suspends <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g image so that what is<br />

emphasized is <strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> hang<strong>in</strong>g. Superficially at least, <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d l<strong>in</strong>e is c<strong>on</strong>cerned with<br />

placement; however, <strong>the</strong> two phrases—“swollen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> woods, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> brambles”—c<strong>on</strong>note a state<br />

<strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g: ostensibly <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a herself, not <strong>the</strong> hang<strong>in</strong>g berries, is swollen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> woods <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

brambles. Once aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e ends with anticipati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong>, <strong>on</strong>ce aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> ensu<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>veys<br />

more than just sett<strong>in</strong>g or locati<strong>on</strong>. The l<strong>in</strong>e “nobody owns, I spend” features a surpris<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>on</strong>trast,<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce two dissimilar c<strong>on</strong>cepts—lack <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>and</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>al spend<strong>in</strong>g—are yoked toge<strong>the</strong>r by<br />

<strong>the</strong> fractured l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> between l<strong>in</strong>es three <strong>and</strong> seven is fur<strong>the</strong>r complicated by <strong>the</strong> breaks.<br />

Syntactically, <strong>the</strong> text reads, “I spend all day am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> high branches, reach<strong>in</strong>g my ripped arms,<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> noth<strong>in</strong>g.” But <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e arrangement says more. <strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong> five reads “branches, reach<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />

On <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence, it is <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a who is reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> branches for berries; but<br />

when read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> isolati<strong>on</strong>, it appears as if <strong>the</strong> branches are reach<strong>in</strong>g. Likewise, <strong>the</strong><br />

“ripped arms” <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e six appear to be th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g—a form <strong>of</strong> synes<strong>the</strong>sia that would have been<br />

impossible without <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g. What’s more, that very po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem provides a strik<strong>in</strong>g<br />

12


transformati<strong>on</strong>al break, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> provided <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> seventh l<strong>in</strong>e undercuts <strong>on</strong>e’s<br />

expectati<strong>on</strong> for <strong>the</strong> act <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g: th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g anyth<strong>in</strong>g is possible, except “noth<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />

Certa<strong>in</strong>ly every l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Oliver’s “August” features deft end<strong>in</strong>gs that give <strong>the</strong> poem a greater<br />

texture. Without tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> poem l<strong>in</strong>e by l<strong>in</strong>e, this case can be made with two more examples. In<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es 10-11, <strong>the</strong> break isolates <strong>and</strong>, c<strong>on</strong>sequently, c<strong>on</strong>fuses <strong>the</strong> sentence’s grammar <strong>in</strong> an<br />

<strong>in</strong>trigu<strong>in</strong>g way, whereas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> penultimate l<strong>in</strong>e an emphatic l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>g underscores <strong>the</strong><br />

importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> image <strong>and</strong> provides lovely music as well. But <strong>the</strong>se are <strong>on</strong>ly some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects<br />

Oliver’s technique yields here. It is sufficient to say <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e breaks <strong>in</strong> “August” cause <strong>the</strong> reader<br />

pause, which <strong>in</strong> turn exacts a certa<strong>in</strong> level <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> meditati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

V. “The Portrait”: A Read<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong> by <strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />

Stanley Kunitz’s poem “The Portrait” dem<strong>on</strong>strates <strong>the</strong> powerful effects l<strong>in</strong>e breaks can achieve.<br />

Unfold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> poem l<strong>in</strong>e-by-l<strong>in</strong>e allows us to study such effects more closely. The first l<strong>in</strong>e reads:<br />

My mo<strong>the</strong>r never forgave my fa<strong>the</strong>r<br />

This declarative statement is at <strong>on</strong>ce reveal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> mysterious. As readers we are aware that a<br />

mo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r are <strong>in</strong>volved, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a <strong>of</strong> this poem must be <strong>the</strong>ir child. We also know<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is a dist<strong>in</strong>ct c<strong>on</strong>flict: <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r cannot forgive <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r for someth<strong>in</strong>g he has d<strong>on</strong>e. But<br />

what has he d<strong>on</strong>e? The l<strong>in</strong>e is anticipatory because it breaks <strong>of</strong>f before crucial new <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> is<br />

produced, thus suspend<strong>in</strong>g what comes next. We learn <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r’s “crime” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next l<strong>in</strong>e:<br />

for kill<strong>in</strong>g himself,<br />

This <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> is unexpected. Had <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r committed adultery, abused <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r, or<br />

gambled all <strong>the</strong>ir sav<strong>in</strong>gs away, <strong>the</strong> “crime” would have been more predictable. But even if<br />

suicide is not <strong>the</strong> most obvious answer, <strong>on</strong>e can make sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong>. The mo<strong>the</strong>r feels<br />

that, <strong>in</strong> kill<strong>in</strong>g himself, her husb<strong>and</strong> has left her al<strong>on</strong>e to raise <strong>the</strong>ir child. Therefore, maybe she<br />

sees his self-<strong>in</strong>flicted death as cowardice. The next l<strong>in</strong>e will provide more c<strong>on</strong>text:<br />

especially at such an awkward time<br />

This new <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> is unusual. Is <strong>the</strong>re ever an appropriate time to kill <strong>on</strong>eself? The first word,<br />

“especially,” signals an ir<strong>on</strong>ic turn, s<strong>in</strong>ce it emphasizes <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> suicide over <strong>the</strong> suicide<br />

13


itself. What’s more, <strong>the</strong> word “awkward” seems petty, selfish, neurotic—as if it were referr<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

an annoyance ra<strong>the</strong>r than a suicide. A careful reader might sense that this word is not <strong>the</strong><br />

pers<strong>on</strong>a’s but <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r’s. Maybe she has said this frequently s<strong>in</strong>ce his death. Whatever <strong>the</strong> case,<br />

<strong>the</strong> word reveals that <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r is not deal<strong>in</strong>g fully with <strong>the</strong> true impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r’s death.<br />

The next l<strong>in</strong>e re<strong>in</strong>forces this noti<strong>on</strong>:<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> a public park,<br />

Here we sense <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r’s shame <strong>in</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g associated with <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r’s public gesture <strong>of</strong> selfsurrender.<br />

Moreover, each l<strong>in</strong>e s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g has been add<strong>in</strong>g more c<strong>on</strong>text <strong>and</strong> <strong>on</strong>e more<br />

bit <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong>. Now we not <strong>on</strong>ly get acti<strong>on</strong> but sett<strong>in</strong>g, too. The follow<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e reveals time:<br />

that spr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

This l<strong>in</strong>e emphasizes a fundamental ir<strong>on</strong>y: why would some<strong>on</strong>e kill himself <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g, a time<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten associated with growth <strong>and</strong> rebirth? This ir<strong>on</strong>y is fur<strong>the</strong>r emphasized <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e:<br />

when I was wait<strong>in</strong>g to be born.<br />

The pers<strong>on</strong>a’s entrance <strong>in</strong>to life is juxtaposed with his fa<strong>the</strong>r’s exit from it. This life-death <strong>the</strong>me<br />

is enhanced when we realize all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> challenges that must face a s<strong>in</strong>gle mo<strong>the</strong>r under such<br />

circumstances. Although we never learn why this man has killed himself, enough detail <strong>and</strong><br />

acti<strong>on</strong> has been supplied to provide a dynamic <strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>and</strong> external c<strong>on</strong>flict for both <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a<br />

<strong>and</strong> his mo<strong>the</strong>r. The use <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e breaks up to this po<strong>in</strong>t helps clarify this tensi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> first six l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> “The Portrait” provide narrative details for <strong>on</strong>e event, <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

poem focuses <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> cause-effect relati<strong>on</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> suicide. The poem now shifts to a different<br />

time: <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> child s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> suicide. Presumably years have passed, but, as <strong>the</strong><br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g metaphor reveals, her anger <strong>and</strong> hurt have not:<br />

She locked his name<br />

<strong>in</strong> her deepest cab<strong>in</strong>et<br />

<strong>and</strong> would not let him out,<br />

though I could hear him thump<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The first l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> this secti<strong>on</strong> emphasizes <strong>the</strong> act <strong>of</strong> lock<strong>in</strong>g a name, while <strong>the</strong> ensu<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e reveals<br />

where it is locked. The third l<strong>in</strong>e highlights <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r’s resolve <strong>in</strong> do<strong>in</strong>g this, though <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e—<strong>in</strong> an expert stroke <strong>of</strong> anti<strong>the</strong>sis—dem<strong>on</strong>strates that such repressi<strong>on</strong> cannot be successfully<br />

14


c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed. Aga<strong>in</strong>, each l<strong>in</strong>e reveals a new crucial piece <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> that ultimately sheds light<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous l<strong>in</strong>es. At this po<strong>in</strong>t, however, <strong>the</strong> poem takes yet ano<strong>the</strong>r turn, this time towards<br />

narrative <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> s<strong>on</strong>:<br />

When I came down from <strong>the</strong> attic<br />

with <strong>the</strong> pastel portrait <strong>in</strong> my h<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> a l<strong>on</strong>g-lipped stranger<br />

with a brave moustache<br />

<strong>and</strong> deep brown level eyes,<br />

Without specify<strong>in</strong>g who <strong>the</strong> stranger is, <strong>the</strong> reader knows <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a is referr<strong>in</strong>g to his fa<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

What motivates <strong>the</strong> boy to do this is unstated. But a few key details <strong>of</strong> this man’s appearance<br />

(seem<strong>in</strong>gly too gallant to have committed suicide!) suggests that <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>a admires <strong>the</strong> man <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> portrait. In turn, his curiosity dem<strong>and</strong>s to be sated. The mo<strong>the</strong>r will not allow this:<br />

she ripped it <strong>in</strong>to shreds<br />

without a s<strong>in</strong>gle word<br />

<strong>and</strong> slapped me hard.<br />

The acti<strong>on</strong> is relegated to <strong>on</strong>e key detail per l<strong>in</strong>e sett<strong>in</strong>g up a c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>uous stream <strong>of</strong> anticipati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Incidentally, <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se three l<strong>in</strong>es suggests that her reacti<strong>on</strong> is not rati<strong>on</strong>ally based.<br />

Words could have been used to reas<strong>on</strong> away her tear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> portrait to shreds. Instead, her bound<br />

up repressi<strong>on</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>gs unc<strong>on</strong>trollably to <strong>the</strong> surface <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> violence. The f<strong>in</strong>al secti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

“The Portrait” retreats from narrative back <strong>in</strong>to c<strong>on</strong>templati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

In my sixty-fourth year<br />

I can feel my cheek<br />

still burn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Here we are c<strong>on</strong>fr<strong>on</strong>ted with <strong>the</strong> distance <strong>of</strong> years. A special emphasis is made, with a l<strong>in</strong>e break,<br />

“still burn<strong>in</strong>g,” which reveals that <strong>the</strong> repercussi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> this experience persist sixty-four years<br />

later.<br />

V. Paus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Accelerati<strong>on</strong>: <strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong> Breaks <strong>and</strong> Matters <strong>of</strong> Breath<br />

So far, I have said noth<strong>in</strong>g about paus<strong>in</strong>g or accelerat<strong>in</strong>g when read<strong>in</strong>g poems aloud; yet most<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g readers assume (or are taught) that <strong>the</strong> primary reas<strong>on</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e breaks exist is to mark a<br />

pause <strong>in</strong> group <strong>of</strong> words. In her excellent <strong>in</strong>troducti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g poetry, For <strong>the</strong> Good <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Earth <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sun, Georgia Heard says “I write my poems <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es; when I read, I pause at each<br />

15


l<strong>in</strong>e break. Pr<strong>of</strong>essors probably tell us not to pause to prevent us from exaggerat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> pause <strong>and</strong><br />

treat<strong>in</strong>g it like a period” (55). While I feel Heard's observati<strong>on</strong> should be rephrased to <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

degrees <strong>of</strong> paus<strong>in</strong>g, what she says is true. Many poems actually sound better when <strong>the</strong> reader<br />

pauses for breath at <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicated l<strong>in</strong>e break. Us<strong>in</strong>g Stanley Kunitz aga<strong>in</strong> as an example, <strong>the</strong> first<br />

four l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> his poem, “Firesticks,” dem<strong>on</strong>strate how a l<strong>in</strong>e break signals <strong>the</strong> pause:<br />

C<strong>on</strong>jugati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> verb “to be”<br />

asleep s<strong>in</strong>ce Adam’s fall<br />

wake from bad phosphor dreams<br />

heavy with m<strong>in</strong>eral desire.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> reader failed to pause after each l<strong>in</strong>e break, <strong>the</strong> phras<strong>in</strong>g would seem awkward <strong>and</strong> prosy. In<br />

paus<strong>in</strong>g, each l<strong>in</strong>e frames its own music. Moreover, this paus<strong>in</strong>g at l<strong>in</strong>e breaks emphasizes <strong>the</strong><br />

simultaneous aut<strong>on</strong>omy <strong>and</strong> dependency each l<strong>in</strong>e’s image has <strong>in</strong> relati<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> images <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es. It would seem, <strong>the</strong>n, that l<strong>in</strong>e breaks promote paus<strong>in</strong>g. But this is not always <strong>the</strong> case. The<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es from L<strong>in</strong>da Pastan’s poem, “To a Daughter Leav<strong>in</strong>g Home,” dem<strong>on</strong>strate how<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e breaks can <strong>of</strong>ten promote a more fluid, n<strong>on</strong>-stop delivery through <strong>the</strong> opposite effect—<br />

accelerati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

I kept wait<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for <strong>the</strong> thud<br />

<strong>of</strong> your crash as I<br />

spr<strong>in</strong>ted to catch up . . .<br />

Here each l<strong>in</strong>e break forces a quick return to <strong>the</strong> left-h<strong>and</strong> marg<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e. If <strong>the</strong> reader paused significantly between each l<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> rapid-fire effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> acti<strong>on</strong> would<br />

be lost. However, a slight pause between <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> a<br />

poem like this cannot be avoided <strong>and</strong> is, <strong>in</strong> fact, expected. Poet Denise Levertov says a reader<br />

might pause at an enjambed l<strong>in</strong>e for about "a half comma <strong>in</strong> durati<strong>on</strong>"––which, though slight, can<br />

be detected by <strong>the</strong> naked ear (New <strong>and</strong> Selected Essays 81). With regards to Pastan's poem above,<br />

such slight paus<strong>in</strong>g creates an <strong>in</strong>trigu<strong>in</strong>g tensi<strong>on</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> reader's ear dem<strong>and</strong>s pause while <strong>the</strong><br />

reader's eye wants to rush from <strong>on</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>e to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> order to keep a steady pace with <strong>the</strong><br />

c<strong>on</strong>tent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem.<br />

When decid<strong>in</strong>g to accelerate or pause at a l<strong>in</strong>e break, <strong>the</strong> poem’s t<strong>on</strong>e <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tent must be taken<br />

<strong>in</strong>to account, especially if <strong>on</strong>e is deal<strong>in</strong>g with verse written <strong>in</strong> free form devoid <strong>of</strong> any regular<br />

rhythmic patterns. (In this light, reexam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es from David St. John’s poem “Iris” at <strong>the</strong> end<br />

16


<strong>of</strong> secti<strong>on</strong> two.) Test your skills at paus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> accelerati<strong>on</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es from yet <strong>on</strong>e more Stanley<br />

Kunitz poem, this <strong>on</strong>e called “A Journal for My Daughter”:<br />

Outside your room<br />

St<strong>and</strong>s <strong>the</strong> white-headed prowler<br />

In his multiple disguises<br />

Who rem<strong>in</strong>ds you <strong>of</strong> your likeness.<br />

VI. Putt<strong>in</strong>g Your Knowledge to <strong>the</strong> Test<br />

Know<strong>in</strong>g what you now know about l<strong>in</strong>e breaks <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e end<strong>in</strong>gs, take a look at Sheryl St.<br />

Germa<strong>in</strong>’s “Rent,” pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> full below. Look carefully at every l<strong>in</strong>e break <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem <strong>and</strong><br />

postulate why <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e ends where it does. Once you can do this, free-form verse will seem like<br />

poetry that follows dist<strong>in</strong>ct formal patterns. However, <strong>the</strong>se patterns are determ<strong>in</strong>ed not by<br />

regular l<strong>in</strong>e lengths <strong>and</strong> end rhymes <strong>of</strong> formal verse, but <strong>in</strong>stead utilize <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tenti<strong>on</strong>ally broken<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es. Note, too, that this poem is not <strong>on</strong>ly organized by well-<strong>in</strong>tenti<strong>on</strong>ed l<strong>in</strong>e breaks but through<br />

group<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es divided by space. These group<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es are called stanzas (Italian for<br />

“room”) <strong>and</strong> are also important aspects <strong>of</strong> free-form poems 3 .<br />

Rent<br />

The hardball came hard <strong>and</strong> fast,<br />

not unexpected, but surpris<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

cruel to <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>e who ran,<br />

face uplifted <strong>and</strong> radiant with joy,<br />

his first baseball game,<br />

arms outstretched as if <strong>in</strong> love,<br />

just to <strong>the</strong> place where<br />

his nose would meet <strong>the</strong> ball<br />

straight <strong>on</strong>—<br />

I heard <strong>the</strong> scream, saw him turn<br />

around, <strong>the</strong> blood spurt<strong>in</strong>g out<br />

<strong>of</strong> both nostrils as if <strong>in</strong> every ve<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> capillary <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nose were cut,<br />

<strong>the</strong> blood pour<strong>in</strong>g down <strong>the</strong> nose<br />

<strong>in</strong>to his mouth, <strong>the</strong> mouth fill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with blood <strong>and</strong> grief, overflow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to <strong>the</strong> ch<strong>in</strong>, runn<strong>in</strong>g down<br />

underneath <strong>the</strong> Cub Scout shirt,<br />

<strong>the</strong> dark red splotches turn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> gold neckerchief red<br />

with blood’s beauty.<br />

17


I saw him put his h<strong>and</strong>s to his nose,<br />

cup it, pull <strong>on</strong>e h<strong>and</strong> away<br />

full <strong>of</strong> blood, fa<strong>the</strong>r take this cup<br />

from me, <strong>and</strong> I couldn’t move<br />

for a moment, though knowledge<br />

c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ued to pour <strong>and</strong> run down his face,<br />

though he looked scream<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at his palm, as if it were<br />

<strong>the</strong> palm’s fault, <strong>the</strong> blood darker<br />

<strong>the</strong>re <strong>and</strong> dry<strong>in</strong>g a little, now<br />

fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>and</strong> life<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

It is my own h<strong>and</strong>, after <strong>the</strong> car accident,<br />

I am <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> back seat,<br />

I have put my h<strong>and</strong> <strong>on</strong> my fa<strong>the</strong>r’s head<br />

to shake him awake, I have pulled<br />

my h<strong>and</strong> away, he has not woken.<br />

I am look<strong>in</strong>g at my palm, sticky<br />

with <strong>the</strong> blood <strong>and</strong> hair <strong>of</strong> my fa<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

all <strong>of</strong> his mortality foretold<br />

for me <strong>the</strong>re <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> blooded palm.<br />

When <strong>on</strong>e breaks a nose,<br />

for that is what my s<strong>on</strong> has d<strong>on</strong>e,<br />

<strong>the</strong> evidence is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> X-ray,<br />

<strong>the</strong> crack like a lost hair<br />

<strong>the</strong>re <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> b<strong>on</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>visible<br />

made visible. If <strong>on</strong>ly we could<br />

X-ray our souls that way, f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

<strong>the</strong> cracks, <strong>the</strong> cancers,<br />

<strong>the</strong> evidence <strong>of</strong> love—<br />

<strong>the</strong>re <strong>in</strong> my fa<strong>the</strong>r’s head,<br />

that crooked l<strong>in</strong>e, that’s love,<br />

here, this o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>on</strong>e, that’s regret.<br />

After you know <strong>the</strong> th<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is broken, <strong>the</strong>re is noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to be d<strong>on</strong>e, you can <strong>on</strong>ly watch<br />

<strong>the</strong> nose swell <strong>and</strong> bloom, flatten<br />

<strong>and</strong> poke out where it shouldn’t,<br />

bruise, open <strong>and</strong> blossom<br />

like a flower that doesn’t<br />

want to die, its petals open bey<strong>on</strong>d belief<br />

for days after cutt<strong>in</strong>g, as if <strong>the</strong> very act<br />

<strong>of</strong> cutt<strong>in</strong>g has brought <strong>on</strong> its most <strong>in</strong>tense beauty.<br />

My s<strong>on</strong> looks at himself <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mirror,<br />

f<strong>in</strong>gers <strong>the</strong> bruised <strong>and</strong> broken<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g as if it were a hurt animal.<br />

18


I th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>of</strong> my fa<strong>the</strong>r’s cracked head,<br />

<strong>the</strong> palm <strong>of</strong> blood, <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r poem to c<strong>on</strong>sider would be Scott Cairns’s “Mud Trail,” also pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> full below:<br />

I’d been walk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mud trail, <strong>the</strong> mud<br />

leap<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>the</strong> sides <strong>of</strong> my boots for hours.<br />

I was th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g I was al<strong>on</strong>e, surrounded<br />

Only by <strong>the</strong> high reach <strong>of</strong> douglas fir<br />

<strong>and</strong> cedar. I th<strong>in</strong>k it was a change<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> air I noticed first, a warmer<br />

heavier scent <strong>of</strong> animal, I was<br />

al<strong>on</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> small clear<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n I was not al<strong>on</strong>e <strong>and</strong> was<br />

surrounded by <strong>the</strong> elk ris<strong>in</strong>g a hundred<br />

times. And <strong>the</strong> forest was a mov<strong>in</strong>g river<br />

<strong>of</strong> elk, n<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m hurry<strong>in</strong>g away, but all<br />

slowly feel<strong>in</strong>g ahead, <strong>and</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir journey to <strong>the</strong> east, a hundred times<br />

<strong>the</strong> same journey.<br />

Miles from <strong>the</strong>re,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y would rest, bed down am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

huckleberry <strong>and</strong> salal, all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m<br />

pull<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir hundred sets <strong>of</strong> hooves, lower<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a hundred velvetted heads, wait<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for whatever sign or word that calls <strong>the</strong>m<br />

all toge<strong>the</strong>r to rise aga<strong>in</strong>.<br />

19


Works Cited<br />

Amm<strong>on</strong>s, A. R. “A Small S<strong>on</strong>g.” The Really Short Poems <strong>of</strong> A. R. Amm<strong>on</strong>s. New York: Nort<strong>on</strong>,<br />

1990.<br />

Brogan, T. V. F.. “<strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong>.” The New Pr<strong>in</strong>cet<strong>on</strong> Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> Poetry <strong>and</strong> Poetics. Alex<br />

Prem<strong>in</strong>ger, et al. Eds. Pr<strong>in</strong>cet<strong>on</strong>: Pr<strong>in</strong>cet<strong>on</strong> University Press, 1993.<br />

Cairns, Scott. “Mud Trail.” Phliokalia: New <strong>and</strong> Selected Poems. L<strong>in</strong>coln: Zoo Press, 2002.<br />

Dick<strong>in</strong>s<strong>on</strong>, Emily. “It would have starved a Gnat—.” The Complete Poems <strong>of</strong> Emily Dick<strong>in</strong>s<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Bost<strong>on</strong>: Little Brown, 1957.<br />

Hales, Corr<strong>in</strong>e. “Power.” In <strong>the</strong> Palm <strong>of</strong> Your H<strong>and</strong>: The Poet’s Portable Workshop. Ed. Steve<br />

Kowit. Gard<strong>in</strong>er: Tilbury House, 1995.<br />

Heard, Georgia. For <strong>the</strong> Good <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Earth <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sun: Teach<strong>in</strong>g Poetry. Portsmouth:<br />

He<strong>in</strong>emann, 1989.<br />

Idd<strong>in</strong>gs, Kathleen. “I Advertised for a Part Time Job.” In <strong>the</strong> Palm <strong>of</strong> Your H<strong>and</strong>: The Poet’s<br />

Portable Workshop. Ed. Steve Kowit. Gard<strong>in</strong>er: Tilbury House, 1995.<br />

Komunyakaa, Yusef. “ Fac<strong>in</strong>g It.” Poetry: A L<strong>on</strong>gman Pocket Anthology. Ed. R. S. Gwynn. New<br />

York: L<strong>on</strong>gman, 1998.<br />

Kunitz, Stanley. “A Journal for My Daughter,” Firesticks,” <strong>and</strong> “The Portrait.” Pass<strong>in</strong>g Through:<br />

The Later Poems, New <strong>and</strong> Selected. New York: Nort<strong>on</strong>, 1995.<br />

Levertov, Denise. "On <strong>the</strong> Functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong>." New <strong>and</strong> Selected Essays. New York: New<br />

Directi<strong>on</strong>s, 1992.<br />

Myers, Jack, <strong>and</strong> Michael Simms. The L<strong>on</strong>gman Dicti<strong>on</strong>ary <strong>of</strong> Poetic Terms. New York:<br />

L<strong>on</strong>gman, 1989.<br />

20


Myers, Jack. “Free Verse <strong>L<strong>in</strong>e</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>.” The Practice <strong>of</strong> Poetry: Writ<strong>in</strong>g Exercises from Poets Who<br />

Teach. Eds. Rob<strong>in</strong> Behn <strong>and</strong> Chase Twichell. New York: Harper Coll<strong>in</strong>s, 1992.<br />

Oliver, Mary. “August” <strong>and</strong> “Farm Country.” New <strong>and</strong> Selected Poems. Bost<strong>on</strong>: Beac<strong>on</strong>, 1992.<br />

Pastan, L<strong>in</strong>da. “To a Daughter Leav<strong>in</strong>g Home.” The Imperfect Paradise. New York: Nort<strong>on</strong>,<br />

1988.<br />

St. John, David. “Iris.” Study for <strong>the</strong> World’s Body: New <strong>and</strong> Selected Poems. New York: Harper<br />

Coll<strong>in</strong>s, 1994.<br />

Sext<strong>on</strong>, Anne. “Man <strong>and</strong> Wife.” C<strong>on</strong>temporary American Poetry, sixth editi<strong>on</strong>. Eds. Al Poul<strong>in</strong> Jr.<br />

<strong>and</strong> Michael Waters. Bost<strong>on</strong>: Hought<strong>on</strong> Miffl<strong>in</strong>, 2001.<br />

Simic, Charles. “Charles Simic.” C<strong>on</strong>temporary American Poetry, sixth editi<strong>on</strong>. Eds. Al Poul<strong>in</strong>,<br />

Jr. <strong>and</strong> Michael Waters. Bost<strong>on</strong>: Hought<strong>on</strong> Miffl<strong>in</strong>, 2001.<br />

St. Germa<strong>in</strong>, Sheryl. “Rent.” The Journals <strong>of</strong> Scheherazade. Dent<strong>on</strong>: University <strong>of</strong> North Texas,<br />

1996.<br />

Whitman, Walt. “Cross<strong>in</strong>g Brooklyn Ferry.” Poetry: A L<strong>on</strong>gman Pocket Anthology. Ed. R. S.<br />

Gwynn. New York: L<strong>on</strong>gman, 1998.<br />

Williams, William Carlos. “The Red Wheelbarrow.” Poetry: A L<strong>on</strong>gman Pocket Anthology. Ed.<br />

R. S. Gwynn. New York: L<strong>on</strong>gman, 1998.<br />

21


End <str<strong>on</strong>g>Notes</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

1 All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> examples <strong>in</strong> secti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e discuss l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> tangible objects <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical<br />

world. But l<strong>in</strong>es also relate to auditory impressi<strong>on</strong>s, particularly those <strong>in</strong> music or organized<br />

sound. For <strong>in</strong>stance, a s<strong>in</strong>ger’s vocal range will determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> musical notati<strong>on</strong> he<br />

or she can s<strong>in</strong>g. Vocalist Mary J. Blige has a deep voice with a restricted range, which means <strong>the</strong><br />

notes she s<strong>in</strong>gs will appear close toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>on</strong> a musical staff without mov<strong>in</strong>g dramatically up or<br />

down. Mariah Carey is ano<strong>the</strong>r matter entirely. She can s<strong>in</strong>g four or five octaves—<strong>and</strong> usually<br />

does. As a result, any given s<strong>on</strong>g she performs will be represented <strong>in</strong> music notati<strong>on</strong> by dramatic<br />

ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> fall<strong>in</strong>g. Nei<strong>the</strong>r vocalist’s style is better or worse because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es she s<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

The real questi<strong>on</strong> is whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e each uses is appropriate for what she wishes to<br />

communicate through her music.<br />

2 It is worth not<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> reiterative “I have” may also reflect an idiomatic speech pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

some<strong>on</strong>e unaccustomed to St<strong>and</strong>ard English. (A student told me <strong>on</strong>ce that she remembers farmers<br />

<strong>in</strong> Scotl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Engl<strong>and</strong> talk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this way.)<br />

3 If stanza means “room” <strong>in</strong> Italian, perhaps <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong> poem might be likened to a house. If <strong>the</strong><br />

poem has three stanzas, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> house has three rooms. Each space between a stanza might be a<br />

hallway for <strong>the</strong> reader to walk through <strong>in</strong> order to reach <strong>the</strong> next room. Those poems with no<br />

stanza breaks might be c<strong>on</strong>sidered similar to a large l<strong>of</strong>t space with no walls or separati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!