DETERMINATION OF THIN FILM'S MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2 DETERMINATION OF THIN FILM’S MECHANICAL PROPERTIES A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Dokuz Eylul University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Metallurgical and Materials Program by Osman ÇULHA December, 2006 İZMİR
3 M. Sc. THESIS EXAMINATION RESULT FORM We have read the thesis entitled “DETERMINATION OF THIN FILM’S MECHANICAL PROPERTIES” completed by OSMAN ÇULHA under revision of PROF. DR. TEVFİK AKSOY and we certify that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Tevfik AKSOY Supervisor (Jury Member) (Jury Member) Prof.Dr. Cahit HELVACI Director Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science ii
Page 1: 1 DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY GRADUATE S
Page 5 and 6: 5 DETERMINATION OF THIN FILM’S ME
Page 7 and 8: 7 CONTENTS Page THESIS EXAMINATION
Page 9 and 10: 9 4.3 Characterization Studies…
Page 11 and 12: 2 Sharp indentation tests also serv
Page 13 and 14: 4 CHAPTER TWO BORONIZING 2.1 Introd
Page 15 and 16: 6 2.3 Advantages of Boriding Boride
Page 17 and 18: 8 Other advantages of boriding incl
Page 19 and 20: 10 2.4 Boriding of Ferrous Material
Page 21 and 22: 12 Fe 2 B peritectoid reaction at a
Page 23 and 24: 14 elements should not be used for
Page 25 and 26: 16 layer, comprising the exterior (
Page 27 and 28: 18 time. The container should not e
Page 29 and 30: 20 wear, whereas thick layers are r
Page 31 and 32: 22 • Bends and baffle plates for
Page 33 and 34: 24 the indenter load and the actual
Page 35 and 36: 26 Figure 3.3 Schematic diagrams Br
Page 37 and 38: 28 specimen by artificially reducin
Page 39 and 40: 30 Recently, it is shown that since
Page 41 and 42: 32 determine the hardness and modul
Page 43 and 44: 34 From theoretical consideration i
Page 45 and 46: 36 4.2 Materials SAE 1020 and SAE 1
Page 47 and 48: 38 CHAPTER FIVE RESULTS AND DISCUSS
Page 49 and 50: 40 a) b)
Page 51 and 52: 42 a) b)
Page 53 and 54:
44 Average thickness measurement of
Page 55 and 56:
46 5.2 Surface Roughness Measuremen
Page 57 and 58:
48 30000 25000 1020-2-160 1020-4-16
Page 59 and 60:
50 45000 40000 35000 1040-2-320 104
Page 61 and 62:
52 Force (mN) 700 650 600 550 500 4
Page 63 and 64:
54 final or residual depth after un
Page 65 and 66:
56 90 80 70 60 Force (mN) 50 40 30
Page 67 and 68:
58 600 500 1020-2 1020-4 1020-6 400
Page 69 and 70:
60 a) b)
Page 71 and 72:
62 a) b)
Page 73 and 74:
64 a) c)
Page 75 and 76:
66 a) b) Figure 5.14 SEM images of
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
72 5.5 FEM Model In order to improv
Page 83 and 84:
74 The indenter was meshed by appro
Page 85 and 86:
76 a) b) Figure 5.21 Magnified view
Page 87 and 88:
78 720 640 560 Yield Strength=7000
Page 89 and 90:
80 CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION 6.1 Gener
Page 91 and 92:
82 FeB layer increase from 0.4014 0
Page 93 and 94:
84 H.C. Child, 1981. Metallurgy and
Page 95:
86 Ugur Sen, Saduman Sen, Sakip Kok
show all

DETERMINATION OF THIN FILM'S MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?