21.11.2014 Views

Fundamentals of Electrochemistry - W.H. Freeman

Fundamentals of Electrochemistry - W.H. Freeman

Fundamentals of Electrochemistry - W.H. Freeman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1504T_ch14_270-297 2/14/06 8:42 Page 282<br />

Box 14-3<br />

Latimer Diagrams: How to Find E for a New Half-Reaction<br />

A Latimer diagram displays standard reduction potentials E°,<br />

connecting various oxidation states <strong>of</strong> an element. 11 For example,<br />

in acid solution, the following standard reduction potentials are<br />

observed:<br />

The standard free-energy change, G°,<br />

given by<br />

G° nFE°<br />

for a reaction is<br />

?<br />

When two reactions are added to give a third reaction, the sum <strong>of</strong><br />

the individual G° values must equal the overall value <strong>of</strong> G°.<br />

1.318<br />

IO 1.589<br />

4<br />

IO 1.154 1.430 0.535<br />

To apply free energy to our problem, we write two reactions<br />

3<br />

HOI I 2<br />

(s) I <br />

Oxidation whose sum is the desired reaction:<br />

(7) (5) (1) (0) (1) state<br />

<strong>of</strong> iodine<br />

1.210<br />

IO 3 6H 5e E 11.210 ° ! 1 2 I 2 (s) 3H 2 O<br />

As an example to understand what the Latimer diagram means, the<br />

notation IO 3 ¡ 1.154 HOI stands for the balanced equation<br />

IO 3<br />

5H 4e T HOI 2H 2 O<br />

We can derive reduction potentials for arrows that are not<br />

shown in the diagram by using G°. For example, the reaction<br />

shown by the dashed line in the Latimer diagram is<br />

IO 3<br />

6H 6e T I 3H 2 O<br />

E° 1.154 V<br />

To find E° for this reaction, express the reaction as a sum <strong>of</strong> reactions<br />

whose potentials are known.<br />

G° 1 5F(1.210)<br />

1<br />

2 I 2 (s) e E° 20.535<br />

! I G° 2 1F(0.535)<br />

IO 3<br />

6H 6e E° 3?<br />

! I 3H 2 O<br />

But, because G° 1 G° 2 G° 3 , we can solve for E° 3 :<br />

G° 3 G° 1 G° 2<br />

6FE° 3 5F(1.210) 1F(0.535)<br />

E° 3 <br />

5(1.210) 1(0.535)<br />

6<br />

G° 3 6FE° 3<br />

1.098 V<br />

Electrons flow toward more positive potential.<br />

Figure 14-8 and note that electrons always flow toward a more positive potential. Therefore,<br />

electrons in the circuit flow from cadmium to silver. The separation <strong>of</strong> the two halfcells<br />

is 1.242 V. This diagram works the same way even if both half-cell potentials are<br />

positive or both are negative. Electrons always flow toward more positive potential.<br />

Different Descriptions <strong>of</strong> the Same Reaction<br />

In Figure 14-4, the right half-reaction can be written<br />

AgCl(s) e T Ag(s) Cl E° 0.222 V<br />

E E° 0.059 16 log [Cl ] 0.222 0.059 16 log (0.033 4) 0.309 3 V<br />

(14-17)<br />

(14-18)<br />

The Cl in the silver half-reaction was derived from 0.016 7 M CdCl 2 (aq).<br />

Suppose that a different, less handsome, author had written this book and had chosen to<br />

describe the half-reaction differently:<br />

Ag e T Ag(s) E° 0.799 V<br />

(14-19)<br />

This description is just as valid as the previous one. In both cases, Ag(I) is reduced to Ag(0).<br />

If the two descriptions are equally valid, then they should predict the same voltage. The<br />

Nernst equation for Reaction 14-19 is<br />

1<br />

E 0.799 0.059 16 log<br />

[Ag ]<br />

Electrons flow<br />

from Cd to Ag<br />

Cd 2+ Cd<br />

E = –0.461 V<br />

Ag + Ag<br />

E = 0.781 V<br />

Figure 14-8 An intuitive view <strong>of</strong> cell<br />

potentials. 2 Electrons always flow to the right in<br />

this diagram.<br />

–1.0 – 0.5 0 0.5 1.0<br />

E(cell) = 0.781 – (–0.461)<br />

= 1.242 V<br />

282 CHAPTER 14 <strong>Fundamentals</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Electrochemistry</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!