IDP Review 2013-14(23 July 2013) - Sekhukhune District Municipality
IDP Review 2013-14(23 July 2013) - Sekhukhune District Municipality
IDP Review 2013-14(23 July 2013) - Sekhukhune District Municipality
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
<strong>Municipality</strong><br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> <strong>IDP</strong> REVIEW
2<br />
SUMMARY INDEX (CONTENTS)<br />
CONTENTS<br />
PAGE NO.<br />
Preface 3<br />
Chapter 1: Introduction and Context 18<br />
Chapter 2: Governance and Institutional<br />
Framework<br />
73<br />
Chapter 3: Analysis Phase 78<br />
Chapter 4: Strategy Phase 249<br />
Chapter 5: Project Phase 276<br />
Chapter 6: Integration Phase 432<br />
Annexure A: SDBIP 455<br />
Annexure B: Organisational Structure 553
3<br />
PREFACE<br />
Integrated Development Planning is a locally based plan that is undertaken by the<br />
municipality in line with the provisions of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act,<br />
2000 (Act 32 of 2000) as well as other myriad of local government legislation. The <strong>IDP</strong>, in<br />
its nature, must be participatory and must pull together various actors within and outside<br />
the municipal area towards achieving common purpose and objectives and eventually<br />
making places where people live, work and play better.<br />
The Integrated Development Plan (<strong>IDP</strong>) <strong>Review</strong> for <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> deals with the challenges,<br />
opportunities, weaknesses and threats that the municipality is facing and will continue to<br />
face. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) experiences a number of challenges in the<br />
areas of access to water, access to electricity, measures to extend refuse removal to more<br />
households, unemployment which is standing at 50,9%, great numbers of female and child<br />
headed households, mechanisms to improve access to sanitation services and more<br />
importantly measures that can lead to job creation.<br />
Equally there are success stories that need to be told. From 1996 there has been slight<br />
shift in unemployment in the district from 61.6% to 50.9% in 2011. Access to water has<br />
improved and it now standing at 75% although challenges still remain around operations<br />
and maintenance. Electricity access is very high at 86% of the population.<br />
It is terribly important to also realise that there are various local and international issues<br />
that the municipality must contribute to in order to ensure that there is better life for all.<br />
The municipality must work two-fold to contribute to millennium development goals, the<br />
new growth path for South Africa and recently the National Development Plan that was<br />
adopted in 2012.
4<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is working increasingly hard to deal with the institutional<br />
and organisational development issues. With staff contingent at 930 in 2011, the<br />
municipality must re-organise the way of doing business to ensure that the expectations<br />
from communities are met.<br />
It cannot be emphasised that the municipality need to turn the corner regarding financial<br />
sustainability issues by ensuring that revenue base is strengthened and that new<br />
opportunities for collection are realised. The municipality is still highly dependent on grants<br />
whilst at the same time large sums of monies are spent on servicing water and sanitation<br />
services, this situation must alter.<br />
SDM is a typically rural municipality with multiple pockets of peri-urban to urban areas.<br />
These areas are surrounded by sparsely populated rural settlements where service levels<br />
are inadequate. There is a need to deal with these spatial challenges and fight land<br />
invasion, conserve strategically located land for the future and formalise informal areas.<br />
The role of tribal authorities is quite central in this process.<br />
In conclusion, the <strong>IDP</strong> <strong>Review</strong> for <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> has been compiled within the Medium Term<br />
Revenue and Expenditure Framework (MTREF) and has included key indicators and<br />
targets for performance per Key Performance Area (KPA). It is envisaged that in<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> and beyond, a demand based performance management system will be<br />
implemented which will take into account the requirement in the annual reports, issues<br />
raised by the Auditor General, the measurable indicators for development from Statistics<br />
South Africa (SSA) and fit that information into the Service Delivery and Budget<br />
Implementation Plan (SDBIP) and <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />
It is important to thank all the role players who have contributed in various ways to this <strong>IDP</strong><br />
<strong>Review</strong> for <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>.
5<br />
Table of Contents<br />
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT .......................................................................... 18<br />
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 19<br />
1.1. POLICIES AND LEGAL PARAMETERS ......................................................................... 19<br />
1.1.1. GLOBAL IMPERATIVES.......................................................................................... 19<br />
1.1.2. NATIONAL POLICIES AND IMPERATIVES ............................................................ 20<br />
1.1.3. PROVINCIAL IMPERATIVES .................................................................................. 27<br />
1.1.4. LOCAL IMPERATIVES ............................................................................................ 28<br />
1.1.5. POWERS AND FUNCTIONS ................................................................................... 31<br />
1.2. MEC’S COMMENTS ....................................................................................................... 34<br />
1.3. AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORT ................................................................................... 36<br />
1.4. PLANNING PROCESS ................................................................................................... 58<br />
1.5. ALIGNMENT WITH NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ................................................ 62<br />
1.6. ALIGNMENT WITH NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN ........................................... 66<br />
1.7. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF THE DISTRICT ............................................................. 68<br />
CHAPTER 2: GOVERNANCE AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ......................................... 73<br />
2.1. LEGISLATURE ............................................................................................................... 74<br />
2.2. CHIEF WHIP ................................................................................................................... 75<br />
2.3. SECTION 80 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEES ..................................................................... 75<br />
2.4. SECTION 79 STANDING COMMITTEES ....................................................................... 76<br />
2.5. THE EXECUTIVE ........................................................................................................... 76<br />
2.6. THE LEADER OF EXECUTIVE BUSINESS .................................................................... 76<br />
2.7. ADMINISTRATION ......................................................................................................... 77<br />
2.8. MUNICIPAL OWNED ENTITY ........................................................................................ 77<br />
2.9. HUMAN RESOURCES ................................................................................................... 77<br />
CHAPTER 3: ANALYSIS PHASE ................................................................................................ 78<br />
3.1 DEMOGRAPHICS IN SDM .................................................................................................. 79<br />
3.2 SPATIAL RATIONALE ......................................................................................................... 94<br />
3.2.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 94
6<br />
3.2.2. Status Quo ............................................................................................................... 94<br />
3.2.3. Challenges ............................................................................................................. 1<strong>14</strong><br />
3.3. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL TRANSFORMATION .... 115<br />
3.3.1. Powers and Funtions of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>...................................... 115<br />
3.3.2. Organizational Structure ........................................................................................ 116<br />
3.3.3. Human Resources Management (HRM) ................................................................ 1<strong>23</strong><br />
3.3.4. Human Resources Development (HRD) ................................................................ 124<br />
3.3.5. Employee Assistance Programme (EAP)............................................................... 125<br />
3.3.6. Occupational Health & Safety ................................................................................ 126<br />
3.3.7. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) ................................................ 127<br />
3.3.8. Auxiliary Services (AS) .......................................................................................... 129<br />
3.3.9. Legal Services ....................................................................................................... 130<br />
3.3.10. Labour Relations .................................................................................................... 131<br />
3.3.11. Organizational Development (OD) ......................................................................... 132<br />
3.3.12. Status Quo on High Level Delivery Areas in 2012/<strong>2013</strong> ......................................... 133<br />
3.4. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT ................... 136<br />
3.4.1. Water ..................................................................................................................... 136<br />
3.4.2. Sanitation ............................................................................................................... <strong>14</strong>5<br />
3.4.3. Refuse removal ...................................................................................................... <strong>14</strong>8<br />
3.4.4. Electricity ............................................................................................................... 150<br />
3.4.5. Cemeteries ............................................................................................................ 153<br />
3.4.6. Housing ................................................................................................................. 154<br />
3.4.7. Telecommunication ................................................................................................ 158<br />
3.4.8. Roads and Stormwater .......................................................................................... 159<br />
3.4.9. Waste Management ............................................................................................... 162<br />
3.4.10. Environmental Management .................................................................................. 164<br />
3.4.11. Sports, Arts and Culture ......................................................................................... 166<br />
3.4.12. Health .................................................................................................................... 167<br />
3.4.13. Education ............................................................................................................... 177<br />
3.4.<strong>14</strong>. Social Services (Welfare)....................................................................................... 181<br />
3.4.15. Safety and Security ................................................................................................ 187
7<br />
3.4.16. Transportation ........................................................................................................ 192<br />
3.5. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................... 194<br />
3.5.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 194<br />
3.5.2. Status Quo ............................................................................................................. 195<br />
3.5.3. Challenges ............................................................................................................. 2<strong>23</strong><br />
3.5.4. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Development Agency (SDA).............................................................. 224<br />
3.6. FINANCIAL VIABILITY.................................................................................................. 227<br />
3.6.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 227<br />
3.6.2. Compliance with Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA).............................. 227<br />
3.6.3. Overall Challenges................................................................................................. 228<br />
3.6.4. Asset Management ................................................................................................ <strong>23</strong>0<br />
3.6.5. Budget and Reporting ............................................................................................ <strong>23</strong>1<br />
3.6.6. Revenue Management ........................................................................................... <strong>23</strong>2<br />
3.6.7. Supply Chain Management .................................................................................... <strong>23</strong>4<br />
3.6.8. Contract Management ........................................................................................... <strong>23</strong>5<br />
3.6.9. Expenditure Management Unit ............................................................................... <strong>23</strong>6<br />
3.6.10. Summary overview of the MTREF ......................................................................... <strong>23</strong>7<br />
3.7. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .............................................. <strong>23</strong>8<br />
3.7.1. Internal Audit.......................................................................................................... <strong>23</strong>8<br />
3.7.2. Risk Management .................................................................................................. <strong>23</strong>9<br />
3.7.3. Public Participation ................................................................................................ 240<br />
3.7.4. Communications, Executive Support and Special Programmes ............................. 242<br />
3.7.5. Performance Management System (PMS)............................................................. 245<br />
3.7.6. High Level Delivery Areas Status Quo for 2012-<strong>2013</strong> ............................................ 246<br />
CHAPTER 4: STRATEGY PHASE ............................................................................................. 249<br />
4.1. VISION ......................................................................................................................... 250<br />
4.2. MISSION ...................................................................................................................... 250<br />
4.3. CORE VALUES OF THE MUNICIPALITY (BATHO PELE PRINCIPLES) ..................... 250<br />
4.4. MAYORAL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES .......................................................................... 250<br />
4.4.1. Economic Growth, Development and Job Creation ................................................ 251<br />
4.4.2. Access to Basic Services and Infrastructure .......................................................... 251
8<br />
4.4.3. Community Development and Social Cohesion ..................................................... 252<br />
4.4.4. Spatial Development and Sustainable Land Use Management .............................. 252<br />
4.4.5. Active Community Participation and Inter-governmental Alignment ....................... 253<br />
4.4.6. Accountable and Clean Government ..................................................................... 253<br />
4.5. SPATIAL RATIONALE .................................................................................................. 254<br />
4.6. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL TRANSFORMATION .... 255<br />
4.6.1. Employee wellness ................................................................................................ 256<br />
4.6.2. Occupational health and safety .............................................................................. 256<br />
4.6.3. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) ................................................ 256<br />
4.6.4. Human Resources Management (HRM) ................................................................ 257<br />
4.6.5. Auxiliary Services .................................................................................................. 257<br />
4.6.6. Legal Services ....................................................................................................... 258<br />
4.6.7. Labour Relations .................................................................................................... 258<br />
4.6.8. Organisational Development (OD) ......................................................................... 259<br />
4.6.9. Human Resources Development (HRD) ................................................................ 259<br />
4.7. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................. 260<br />
4.7.1. Water ..................................................................................................................... 260<br />
4.7.2. Sanitation ............................................................................................................... 261<br />
4.7.3. Disaster Management ............................................................................................ 261<br />
4.7.4. Environmental Management .................................................................................. 263<br />
4.7.5 Sports, Arts and Culture .............................................................................................. 263<br />
4.7.6. Emergency management ....................................................................................... 264<br />
4.7.7. Municipal Health Services ...................................................................................... 266<br />
4.8. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (LED)................................................................ 266<br />
4.8.1. LED ....................................................................................................................... 266<br />
4.8.2. SDA ....................................................................................................................... 267<br />
4.9. FINANCIAL VIABILITY.................................................................................................. 268<br />
4.10. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .............................................. 271<br />
4.10.1. Internal Audit.......................................................................................................... 271<br />
4.10.2. Risk Management .................................................................................................. 272<br />
4.10.3. Communication, Executive support and Special program ...................................... 273
9<br />
4.10.4. Public Participation ................................................................................................ 274<br />
4.10.5. Secretariat ............................................................................................................. 274<br />
4.10.6. Clean Audit ............................................................................................................ 274<br />
4.10.7. Councillor Welfare.................................................................................................. 275<br />
4.10.8. Capacity Building ................................................................................................... 275<br />
4.10.9. Performance Management System (PMS)............................................................. 275<br />
CHAPTER 5: PROJECTS PHASE ............................................................................................. 276<br />
5.1. SPATIAL RATIONALE .................................................................................................. 277<br />
5.2. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL TRANSFORMATION .... 279<br />
5.3. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT ................... 299<br />
5.4. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (LED)................................................................ 347<br />
5.5. FINANCIAL VIABILITY.................................................................................................. 351<br />
5.6. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .............................................. 358<br />
5.7. PROVINCIAL AND NATIONAL AGENCIES AND DEPARTMENTS .............................. 386<br />
CHAPTER 6: INTEGRATION PHASE ........................................................................................ 432<br />
6.1. STATUS OF SECTOR PLANS ..................................................................................... 433<br />
6.2. SPATIAL RATIONALE .................................................................................................. 433<br />
6.3. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY ........................................................................................ 436<br />
6.4. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................... 444<br />
6.5. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .............................................. 445<br />
6.6. FINANCIAL VIABILITY.................................................................................................. 450<br />
ANNEXURE A ............................................................................................................................ 455<br />
SERVICE DELIVERY AND BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SDBIP) <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> .............. 455<br />
ANNEXURE B ............................................................................................................................ 553<br />
ADOPTED ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> ............................................................. 553
10<br />
LIST OF TABLES<br />
Table<br />
number<br />
Subject<br />
Table1<br />
Table 2<br />
Table 3<br />
Table 4<br />
Table 5<br />
Table 6<br />
Table 7<br />
Table 8<br />
Table 9<br />
Table 10<br />
Table 11<br />
Table 12<br />
Table 13<br />
Table <strong>14</strong><br />
Composition of the structure, Roles and Responsibilities<br />
Number of wards per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Households in the district<br />
Main Dwellings<br />
Household tenure status<br />
Household ownership, Radio, Television, Computer, Refrigerator, Landline, Cell<br />
phone, Internet<br />
The recorded population figures per local municipality<br />
Gender profile: Males and Females<br />
Population growth by race<br />
Age and gender profile<br />
Marital Status<br />
Education status<br />
Education profile per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Categories of migrants from <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households<br />
Table 15 Remittances received by <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households in 2006<br />
Table 16<br />
Table 17<br />
Table 18<br />
Table 19<br />
Table 20<br />
Table 21<br />
Table 22<br />
Disability Types<br />
Income Groups in the SDM<br />
Economically Active population<br />
The Breakdown of employment by industry in the SDM<br />
Expected Population Growth Areas / Points for the SDM<br />
Land Use Patterns in the SDM<br />
Existing (Operational) and Planned Mines in the SDM
11<br />
Table <strong>23</strong> Projected Employment in Platinum Mining within / near the SDM up to 2015<br />
Table 24<br />
Table 25<br />
Table 26<br />
Table 27<br />
Table 28<br />
Table 29<br />
Table 30<br />
Table 31<br />
Table 32<br />
Table 33<br />
Table 34<br />
Table 35<br />
Table 36<br />
Table 37<br />
Table 38<br />
Table 39<br />
Table 40<br />
Table 41<br />
Table 42<br />
Table 43<br />
Table 44<br />
Table 45<br />
Table 46<br />
Table 47<br />
Accommodation Facilities in the SDM<br />
Hierarchy of settlements<br />
Growth Points in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
Land use patterns in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Domestic water services with infrastructure at or above RDP levels<br />
Water Services in Schools<br />
Water Services in Clinics<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Households that pay for water<br />
Water Backlog A<br />
Water Backlog B<br />
Access to piped water<br />
Breakdown of Sanitation Backlog per Local <strong>Municipality</strong> A<br />
Breakdown of Sanitation Backlog per Local <strong>Municipality</strong> B<br />
School Sanitation<br />
Clinic Sanitation<br />
Sanitation Type<br />
Access to Refuse Removal<br />
Electricity backlog per municipality<br />
Households receiving free electricity in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Energy for lighting, heating and cooking<br />
Typology of houses in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Dwelling types as a % of Households<br />
Housing Backlog<br />
Housing projects in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>
12<br />
Table 48<br />
Table 49<br />
Table 50<br />
Table 51<br />
Table 52<br />
Table 53<br />
Table 54<br />
Table 55<br />
Table 56<br />
Table 57<br />
Table 58<br />
Table 59<br />
Table 60<br />
Table 61<br />
Table 62<br />
Table 63<br />
Table 64<br />
Table 65<br />
Table 66<br />
Table 67<br />
Table 68<br />
Table 69<br />
Table 70<br />
Table 71<br />
Table 72<br />
Number of the structures on the road network under ownership of SDM<br />
Road network in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (<strong>District</strong> Roads)<br />
Number of health facilities in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Access to hospitals<br />
Access to clinics and professionals<br />
Availability of professional staff in clinics and hospitals<br />
Ranking <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s performance in SA: Key health indicators<br />
State of HIV/AIDS<br />
Backlog for Building of Clinics<br />
Health facilities<br />
Health facilities satisfaction status<br />
Health Facilities water supply<br />
Health facilities sanitation supply<br />
Health Facilities electricity available<br />
Education profile per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Shortage of Infrastructure in schools<br />
Backlogs for the building of schools<br />
Schools per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Schools source of water<br />
Schools type of sanitation<br />
Schools electricity availability<br />
Early childhood development centres<br />
Statistics on Grant Beneficiaries<br />
Beneficiaries of Key government programmes<br />
Most food – insecure areas in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>
13<br />
Table 73<br />
Table 74<br />
Table 75<br />
Table 76<br />
Table 77<br />
Table 78<br />
Table 79<br />
Pension pay points<br />
Pension pay points water supply<br />
Pension pay points sanitation available<br />
Pension pay points electricity available<br />
Crime Statistics in the SDM<br />
All subsidized bus operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
Distribution of Non-Subsidized Bus Operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
Municipal Area:<br />
Table 80 Key sectoral contributions to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s GGP (1995-2000)<br />
Table 81<br />
Table 82<br />
Table 83<br />
Table 84<br />
Table 85<br />
Table 86<br />
Table 87<br />
Table 88<br />
Table 89<br />
Table 90<br />
Table 91<br />
Table 92<br />
Table 93<br />
Table 94<br />
Table 95<br />
Operating and Projected Platinum Mines <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Market prospects for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> minerals<br />
Projected employment in platinum mining in/near <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Accommodation facilities in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Priority sectors of local municipality<br />
Main sectors: Services, Transport & Logistics, Construction, Manufacturing,<br />
property Market Agriculture, Agro-processing and Tourism<br />
Main markets: National Retailers, EU Agents & Chain stores, Gauteng Fresh<br />
Produce Markets - Sector: Agriculture, Agro-processing<br />
Tourism Sector: Accommodation and other tourism service providers<br />
Local Suppliers, Construction, transport & logistics, Services, Manufacturing,<br />
property market, Tourism<br />
Constraints to economic growth in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Employment levels<br />
Average household income<br />
Female Headed Households<br />
Child Headed Households<br />
Dependency Ratio
<strong>14</strong><br />
Table 96<br />
Table 97<br />
Table 98<br />
The AFS has been compiled in terms of GAMAP/GRAP<br />
Challenges and backlogs at Budget & Treasury Unit<br />
Summary overview of the MTREF<br />
Table 99 High level delivery areas status quo for 2012-13<br />
Table 100<br />
Table 101<br />
Table 102<br />
Table 103<br />
Table 104<br />
Policies/strategies<br />
Strategy Options<br />
Principles of PMS<br />
Roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders in PMS<br />
Accountability structure during the review process<br />
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
Figure<br />
Subject<br />
Number<br />
Figure 1 The NSDP principles and perspective informing the basis for robust analysis for the three<br />
spheres of government<br />
Figure 2 Development Strategy<br />
Figure 3 Key activities and time frames for <strong>IDP</strong> Process<br />
Figure 4 Geographic Location Map<br />
Figure 5 Land size per Local <strong>Municipality</strong> in %<br />
Figure 6 Map of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> Municipal area<br />
Figure 7 SDM Wards<br />
Figure 8 Number of villages in the district<br />
Figure 9 Population growth rate<br />
Figure 10<br />
Figure 11<br />
Figure 12<br />
Figure 13<br />
Figure <strong>14</strong><br />
Population trends per LM<br />
Gender Profile: Males and Females<br />
Population by race<br />
Age structure<br />
Marital Status
15<br />
Figure 15<br />
Figure 16<br />
Figure 17<br />
Figure 18<br />
Figure 19<br />
Figure 20<br />
Figure 21<br />
Figure 22<br />
Figure <strong>23</strong><br />
Figure 24<br />
Figure 25<br />
Figure 26<br />
Figure 27<br />
Figure 28<br />
Figure 29<br />
Figure 30<br />
Figure 31<br />
Figure 32<br />
Figure 33<br />
Figure 34<br />
Education status<br />
SDM Population Distribution Map<br />
SDM Growth Point<br />
Centres of Agricultural Production<br />
Operational Mines in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
SDM Transport Network<br />
Growth points in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
Water supply energy source<br />
Frequency of water supply by village<br />
Pump operator availability by village<br />
Source of water supply by village<br />
Standard of water supply by village<br />
Type of sanitation by village<br />
Sanitation programme implemented by government by village<br />
Refuse removal according to villages<br />
Electricity supply<br />
Electricity post connections<br />
Access to cemeteries<br />
Government Housing Programme (RDP Housing)<br />
Telecommunication<br />
Figure 35 Gravel and Tarred Roads<br />
Figure 36 Main Revenue Flow<br />
Figure 37 Employment levels 2011<br />
Figure 38<br />
Local Economic Development Projects
16<br />
Abbreviations<br />
AS<br />
CoGHSTA<br />
DoE<br />
DoA<br />
DWAE<br />
ECD<br />
EAP<br />
EIA<br />
EPWP<br />
FBE<br />
FBS<br />
FBW<br />
FIVIMS<br />
GGP<br />
HIV<br />
HOD<br />
HRD<br />
HRM<br />
ICT<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
IEMP<br />
IGR<br />
ISDF<br />
ISRDP<br />
ITP<br />
IWMP<br />
LDOs<br />
LDV<br />
LED<br />
LEDET<br />
LEGDP<br />
LGDS<br />
LIBSA<br />
LIMDEV<br />
LM<br />
LSM<br />
LTP<br />
Auxiliary Services<br />
Co-operative Governance, Human Settlements & Traditional Affairs<br />
Department of Energy<br />
Department of Agriculture<br />
Department of Water Affairs and Environment<br />
Early Childhood Development<br />
Employee Assistance Programme<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment<br />
Expanded Public Works Programme<br />
Free Basic Electricity<br />
Free Basic Services<br />
Free Basic Water<br />
Food Insecurity and Vulnerability Information Management System<br />
Gross Geographic Product<br />
Human Immunodeficiency Virus<br />
Head Of Department<br />
Human Resource Development<br />
Human Resource Management<br />
Information Communication Technology<br />
Integrated Development Plan<br />
Integrated Environmental Management Plan<br />
Intergovernmental Relations<br />
Integrated Spatial Development Framework<br />
Integrated and Sustainable Rural Development<br />
Integrated Transport Plan<br />
Integrated Waste Management Plan<br />
Land Development Objectives<br />
Light Delivery Vehicle<br />
Local Economic Development<br />
Limpopo Department of Economic Development Environmental Affair and<br />
Tourism<br />
Limpopo Employment, Growth and Development Plan<br />
Limpopo Growth and Development Strategy<br />
Limpopo Business Support Agency<br />
Limpopo Economic Development Enterprise<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Living Standard Measures<br />
Limpopo Tourism Parks Board
17<br />
LUMS<br />
MDG<br />
MEC<br />
MIG<br />
MLL<br />
MM<br />
MPCC<br />
MRM<br />
MTEF<br />
MTSF<br />
NGO<br />
NLTTA<br />
NSDP<br />
OD<br />
OHS<br />
PGMs<br />
PHC<br />
PMS<br />
RAL<br />
RDP<br />
SANAC<br />
SAPS<br />
SARS<br />
SASSA<br />
SDBIP<br />
SDF<br />
SDM<br />
SMME<br />
SOPs<br />
STATSSA<br />
TDM<br />
URP<br />
WWTW<br />
WSA<br />
WSDP<br />
WSP<br />
Land Use Management System<br />
Millennium Development Goal<br />
Member of Executive Committee<br />
Municipal Infrastructure Grant<br />
Minimum Living Level<br />
Municipal Manager<br />
Multi-Purpose Community Centres<br />
Moral Regeneration Movement<br />
Medium Term Expenditure Framework<br />
Medium Term Strategic Framework<br />
Non-Governmental Organisation<br />
National Land Transport Transition Act<br />
National Spatial Development Perspective<br />
Organisational Development<br />
Occupational Health and Safety<br />
Platinum Group Metals<br />
Primary Health Care<br />
Performance Management System<br />
Roads Agency Limpopo<br />
Reconstruction and Development Programme<br />
South African National AIDS Council<br />
South African Police Services<br />
South African Revenue Services<br />
South African Social Security Agency<br />
Service Delivery Business Implementation Plan<br />
Spatial Development Framework<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Small, Medium and Micro Enterprise<br />
Standing Operating Procedures<br />
Statistics South Africa<br />
Travel Demand Management<br />
Urban Renewal Programme<br />
Waste Water Treatment Works<br />
Water Services Authority<br />
Water Services Development Plan<br />
Water Service Provider
18<br />
CHAPTER 1:<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
AND CONTEXT
19<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> is a strategic development tool to assist the municipality to achieve its developmental<br />
imperatives. The compilation of this <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> Integrated Development Planning (<strong>IDP</strong>) document for<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has followed both an extensive internal and external consultation<br />
of various respective public participation tools with communities and stakeholders within the<br />
parameters of the <strong>District</strong>’s sphere of operation. This document is a legislative mandate and a<br />
strategic planning instrument that guide and inform planning and development as well as decisions<br />
with regard to planning, management and development throughout the <strong>District</strong>. The Municipal<br />
Systems Act (2000) provides the legal framework for municipal development planning to assist<br />
Local Government (<strong>District</strong>) to discharge its mandates.<br />
1.1. POLICIES AND LEGAL PARAMETERS<br />
In formulating the <strong>IDP</strong> cognisance ought to be given to Global, National, Provincial and Local<br />
policy and legislative imperatives:<br />
1.1.1. GLOBAL IMPERATIVES<br />
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)<br />
The United Nations Millennium Declaration committed global heads of states to making the right to<br />
development a reality for everyone and to freeing the entire human race from want. The<br />
Millennium declaration, signed by world’s leaders of 189 countries in 2000, established 2015 as<br />
the deadline for achieving most of the MDGs. The majorities of the MDGs targets have baseline of<br />
1990, and are set to monitor achievements over the period 1990-2015. The objective of the<br />
Declaration is to promote “a comprehensive approach and a coordinated strategy, tackling many<br />
problems simultaneously across a broad front”.<br />
The Declaration calls for halving by the year 2015, the number of people who live on less than one<br />
dollar a day (1993 PPP). This effort also involves finding solutions to hunger, malnutrition and<br />
disease, promoting gender equality and the empowerment of women, guaranteeing a basic
20<br />
education for everyone, and supporting the Agenda 21 principles of sustainable development.<br />
Vision 20<strong>14</strong> provides a series for socio-economic development milestones to ensure progressive<br />
attainment of development, which can be summed up as follows:<br />
· Access to basic water for all by 2008<br />
· Access to basic sanitation at RDP level by 2010<br />
· All schools and clinics have access to water and sanitation by 2007<br />
· Bucket toilet system to be eradicated by 2006<br />
· Electricity to all households by 2012<br />
· Halve unemployment by 20<strong>14</strong><br />
· Economic growth of 6% by 2010<br />
· Access to education and health care for all<br />
1.1.2. NATIONAL POLICIES AND IMPERATIVES<br />
1.1.2.1. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (Act 108 of 1996)<br />
Section 151 of the Constitution, states that developmental local government should make provision<br />
for a democratic and accountable government for local communities. Local government must<br />
promote a safe and healthy environment and encourage community involvement in matters of local<br />
government such as municipal health services, municipal transport, municipal roads, municipal<br />
parks and recreation.<br />
Section 152 states that local government should ensure the provision of services to communities in<br />
a sustainable manner and encourages the involvement of communities and community<br />
organizations in matters of local government.<br />
Section 153 states that each municipality should structure and manage its administration,<br />
budgeting and planning processes to give priority to the basic needs of the community.<br />
1.1.2.2. White Paper on Local Government (1998)
21<br />
It views the <strong>IDP</strong> as a way of achieving developmental local government. It establishes a basis for<br />
developmental local government in which “local government is committed to working with citizens<br />
and groups within the community to find sustainable ways to meet their social, economic and<br />
material needs and improve the quality of their lives’. It also encourages public consultation in<br />
policy formulation and in monitoring and evaluation of decision-making and implementation.<br />
1.1.2.3. Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of 2000)<br />
It regulates the <strong>IDP</strong>. It requires the municipality to undertake developmental oriented planning so<br />
as to ensure that it strives to achieve the objectives of local government set out in Section 152 and<br />
153 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Section 25 (1) requires the Municipal<br />
Council, within a prescribed period after the start of its elected term, to adopt a single, inclusive<br />
and strategic plan for the development of the municipality. Section 26 of the Act further outlines the<br />
core components of the <strong>IDP</strong> of a municipality.<br />
1.1.2.4. Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (Act 117 of 1998)<br />
Municipal Structures, Act 117 of 1998 provides for the establishment of municipalities, their internal<br />
structures and the division of powers between local and district municipalities. It gives district<br />
municipalities the responsibilities for <strong>IDP</strong> for the entire district area, including a framework for all<br />
local municipalities. <strong>District</strong> municipalities, have a responsibility for inter-local co-ordination, and for<br />
links with provincial and national departments. Local municipalities should produce plans that are<br />
aligned to the district plan. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is responsible to the planning activities<br />
of its local municipalities.<br />
1.1.2.5. Municipal Finance Management Act (Act 56 of 2003)<br />
The Municipal Finance Management Act 9 MFMA) was promulgated to sustain the finances of<br />
both the municipalities and other spheres of government. The Act also gives mandatory obligations<br />
on performance management system. Section 2 of the Act’s objectives is to secure sound and<br />
sustainable management of the financial affairs of the local government institutions to which this<br />
Act applies by establishing norms and standards.
22<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) budget process endeavors to comply to the provision of<br />
the MFMA. It is pertinent that the development of the <strong>IDP</strong> and the budget process are integrated<br />
and aligned as per legislation.<br />
1.1.2.6. Inter-Governmental Relations Framework Act (Act 13 of 2005)<br />
This Act responds to the limited successes of alignment amongst the three spheres of<br />
government. The Act creates a framework to support intergovernmental cooperation and<br />
coordination as required by the Constitution in its definition of “cooperative governance”. It<br />
compels all the three spheres of government to participate in the planning processes of the<br />
municipalities and in turn allow their own planning processes to be influenced by the municipal<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>s.<br />
Municipal <strong>IDP</strong>s are therefore the centres of planning for both provincial and national programmes<br />
in a specific local area. Municipalities participate in <strong>District</strong>-planning for a, Municipal Manager’s<br />
FORA and Mayor’s FORA as well as in the Premier’s Intergovernmental FORA to ensure proper<br />
alignment and coordination of Local, <strong>District</strong>, Provincial and National plans. The Act establishes<br />
structures and processes that enhance intergovernmental planning and monitoring processes that<br />
enhance intergovernmental planning and monitoring processes for Local, Provincial and National<br />
spheres of government.<br />
1.1.2.7. Development Facilitation Act (DFA) (Act 65 of 1995)<br />
The DFA has formalized the restructuring of urban settlements and planning in South Africa. Its<br />
aim has been to expedite land development projects and to promote efficient and integrated land<br />
development. It states that municipalities should prepare the land Development Objectives (LDOs)<br />
on an annual basis.<br />
1.1.2.8. The National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP)<br />
The National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP) (Presidency, 2006) is the primary spatial<br />
lens through which policymakers view socio-economic development in the country as a whole. It
<strong>23</strong><br />
presents a wide variety of socio-economic trends emerging in South Africa, and then draws<br />
inferences about how that emerging space economy should affect public investment (expenditure)<br />
in the immediate future.<br />
NSDP Principles<br />
Given the Government’s objectives of growing the economy, creating jobs, addressing poverty and<br />
promoting social cohesion, the NSDP assist government in confronting three fundamental planning<br />
questions:<br />
If Government were to prioritise investment and development spending in line with its goals and<br />
objectives, where would it invest/spend to achieve sustainable outcomes?<br />
Given the apartheid spatial configuration, what kinds of spatial arrangements are more conducive<br />
to the achievement of our goals of nation-building and of social and economic inclusion?<br />
How can government as a whole capitilise on complementaries and facilitate consistent decision<br />
making and move beyond focusing on integration and coordination procedures to establishing<br />
processes and mechanisms that will bring about strategic coordination, interaction and alignment?<br />
The NSDP thus puts forth the following set of five normative principles to address the above<br />
planning questions.<br />
• Principle 1<br />
Rapid economic growth that is sustained and inclusive is a prerequisite for the achievement of<br />
other policy objectives, among which poverty alleviation is key.<br />
• Principle 2<br />
Government has a Constitutional obligation to provide basic services to all citizens (e.g. water,<br />
electricity, health, education, etc.) wherever they reside.
24<br />
• Principle 3<br />
Beyond the Constitutional obligation identified in principle 2 above, government spending on fixed<br />
investment should be focused on localities of economic growth and/or economic potential, in order<br />
to gear up private sector investment, stimulate sustainable economic activities and create longterm<br />
employment opportunities.<br />
• Principle 4<br />
Efforts to address past and current social inequalities should focus on people, not places. In<br />
localities where there are both high level of poverty and demonstrated economic potential, this<br />
could include fixed capital investment beyond the provision of basic services to exploit the potential<br />
of those localities. In localities with low demonstrated economic potential, government should,<br />
beyond the provision of basic services, concentrate primarily on human capital development by<br />
providing education and training, social transfers such as grants and poverty-relief programmes. It<br />
should also reduce migration costs by providing labour-market intelligence to give people better<br />
information, opportunities and capabilities, to enable them to gravitate-if they choose to-to localities<br />
that are more likely to provide sustainable employment and economic opportunities.<br />
• Principle 5<br />
In order to overcome spatial distortions of apartheid, future settlement and economic development<br />
opportunities should be channeled into activity corridors and nodes that are adjacent to or that link<br />
to the main growth centres. Infrastructure investments should primarily support localities that will<br />
became major growth nodes in South Africa and the SADC region to create regional gateways to<br />
the global economy.<br />
These principles are aimed specifically at focusing government action and investment to achieve<br />
maximum social and economic impact within the context of limited resources.<br />
The diagram below illustrates
25<br />
Figure 1 - The NSDP principles and perspective informing the basis for robust analysis for<br />
the three spheres of government<br />
Source: National Spatial Development Perspective. The Presidency (2006)<br />
The NSDP indicates that each spheres of government has its own distinct development<br />
tasks and related planning frameworks corresponding to the scale of operations and the<br />
area of jurisdiction. For these frameworks to be coordinated and strategically aligned,<br />
each sphere will have to adopt the NSDP methodology and approach.<br />
1.1.2.9. The Medium-Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) (2009-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
The Medium-Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) endeavors to pinpoint important strategic<br />
preferences in order to put the country on a higher path in dealing with poverty and<br />
underdevelopment. It serves as a backdrop to guide planning and budgeting across the<br />
three spheres of government. It identifies few critical things that should be done to define a<br />
new trajectory for the country’s development.<br />
The following are the key objectives for 20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
ü<br />
Halve poverty and unemployment
26<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
Ensure a more equitable distribution of the benefits of economic growth and reduce<br />
inequality<br />
Improve the nation’s health profile and skills based and ensure universal access to<br />
basic services<br />
Improve the safety of citizens by reducing incidents of crime and corruption<br />
Build a nation free of all forms of racism, sexism, tribalism and xenophobia<br />
The priority areas to give effect to the above strategic objectives are:<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
More inclusive economic growth, decent work, and sustainable livelihoods<br />
Economic and social infrastructure<br />
Rural development, food security and land reform<br />
Access to quality education<br />
Improve health care<br />
The fight against crime and corruption<br />
Cohesive and sustainable communities<br />
To ensure capacity to meet these objectives, the following critical measures according to<br />
MTSF have to be adopted:<br />
· Cooperation among economic partners.<br />
· Strong partnership across all sectors.<br />
· Improving the system of monitoring and evaluation.<br />
· Focusing on economic development in areas with economic potential.<br />
· Recruiting and skilling law-enforcement agencies.<br />
1.1.2.10. Outcomes of Government<br />
In January 2010, Cabinet adopted 12 Outcomes within which to frame public-service<br />
delivery priorities and targets. All municipalities are expected to take the 12 outcomes into<br />
consideration when developing/reviewing their <strong>IDP</strong>s and their Annual Budgets.<br />
1. Improve the quality of basic education<br />
2. Improve health and life expectancy<br />
3. All people in South Africa protected and feel safe<br />
4. Decent employment through inclusive economic growth<br />
5. A skilled and capable workforce to support inclusive growth<br />
6. An efficient, competitive and responsive economic infrastructure network
27<br />
7. Vibrant, equitable and sustainable rural communities and food security<br />
8. Sustainable human settlements and improved quality of household life<br />
9. A response and, accountable, effective and efficient local government system<br />
10. Protection and enhancement of environmental assets and natural resources<br />
11. A better South Africa, a better and safer Africa and World<br />
12. A development-oriented public service and inclusive citizenship<br />
1.1.2.11. Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP)<br />
The principal objective of this programme is to launch and expand labour intensive<br />
projects that will provide opportunities for skills development to create an enabling<br />
environment for employment and self-employment. It will also assist in building capacity<br />
for the maintenance of infrastructure; provide community service and the development of a<br />
programme for Early Childhood Development (ECD). SDM, like other district in Limpopo,<br />
is gearing towards the effective implementation of EPWP programme and even expanding<br />
it to other sectors of the economy.<br />
1.1.2.12. Development of Small and Micro-Enterprises<br />
The enabling environment should be created through legislation to harness the<br />
entrepreneurial capabilities available in local communities. These capabilities would<br />
encourage self-employment and the employment of other job seekers. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has come with interventionist measures through LED Strategy to deal<br />
with the problem of unemployment.<br />
1.1.3. PROVINCIAL IMPERATIVES<br />
1.1.3.1. The Limpopo Employment, Growth and Development Plan<br />
(LEGDP) - 2009-20<strong>14</strong><br />
The Limpopo Employment, Growth and Development Plan (LEGDP) (Limpopo Province,<br />
2009-20<strong>14</strong>) is aimed at enhancing the competitive advantages of the province.<br />
Key Strategic Priorities<br />
The Limpopo Provincial Government has contextualized ten (10) Priority Areas as<br />
contained in the (MTSF) into key strategic priorities which will guide service delivery:
28<br />
‣ Ensuring more inclusive economic growth, decent work, and sustainable livelihoods<br />
‣ Economic and social infrastructure<br />
‣ Rural development, food security and land reform<br />
‣ Access to quality education<br />
‣ Improved health care<br />
‣ Fighting crime and corruption<br />
‣ Cohesive and sustainable communities<br />
‣ Creation of a better Africa and a better world<br />
‣ Sustainable resource management and use<br />
‣ A developmental state including improvement of public services<br />
Key Action Programmes<br />
To achieve the above priorities, the following action programmes have been identified:<br />
‣ Industrial Development Programme: Priority Growth Sector<br />
‣ Enterprise Development: SMMEs and Corporative Development Programme<br />
‣ Regional Economic Development and Integration Programme<br />
‣ Public Infrastructure Development Programme<br />
‣ Water Resource Development and Demand Management<br />
‣ Agriculture and Rural Development Programme<br />
‣ Education and Skills Development Programme<br />
‣ Health Care Development Programme<br />
‣ Safety and Security<br />
‣ Environmental and Natural Resources Development Programme<br />
‣ The Green Economy and creation of green jobs<br />
‣ Corporate Governance<br />
‣ ICT and Innovation Enabled Industries<br />
1.1.4. LOCAL IMPERATIVES<br />
1.1.4.1. 2025 Development Strategy (<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>’s Long-term Strategy)<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 2025 Development Strategy is an articulation of the longer term strategic<br />
direction to be pursued by the district as well as social partners in order to accelerate<br />
economic growth and enhance development in the district.
29<br />
The 2025 Development Strategy is aligned and harmonized with various mandatory plans<br />
prescribed in various pieces of legislations. In terms of hierarchy, the plans can be<br />
visualized as shown below:<br />
Figure 2 – Development Strategy<br />
2025<br />
DEVELOPMENT<br />
STRATEGY<br />
INTEGRATED<br />
DEVELOPMENT<br />
PLAN<br />
(<strong>IDP</strong>)<br />
SECTOR<br />
PLANS<br />
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SDBIP)<br />
SERVICE DELIVERY AND BUDGET<br />
- The 2025 Development Strategy charts a long-term strategic course and makes<br />
some of the bigger, overarching decisions about what the <strong>District</strong> ought to<br />
emphasize;<br />
- The Integrated Development Plan (<strong>IDP</strong>) defines what will be achieved in 5 years<br />
flowing from the strategy;
30<br />
- The Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan (SDBIP) articulates what will<br />
be done in 1 year.<br />
The 2025 Development strategy is structured into three components:<br />
· Baseline Research: Trends analysis in various thematic issues that are<br />
considered as shaping the district’s present and future. These include a whole<br />
range of social, economic, political and environmental trends;<br />
· Scenarios: Four scenarios on different types of futures that might be experienced<br />
in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> depending on particular choice of policy positions;<br />
· Investment Plans: Detailed short-to-medium term priority plans to be pursued by<br />
the district.<br />
1.1.4.2. Key Sector Plans<br />
The SDM recognized the need to develop future strategies, policies and plans which seek<br />
to deal with specific issues that will facilitate a progressive realization of the desired<br />
developmental trajectory of the <strong>District</strong>. A closer analysis of all these strategies and plans<br />
will show a greater degree of alignment of all the guidelines and development directives<br />
outlined in the government policy frameworks above.<br />
For the past few years, the SDM has developed numerous sectoral strategic and<br />
operational plans together with policies as joint venture with all local municipalities within<br />
the <strong>District</strong> as outlined below:<br />
Local Economic Development and Job Creation<br />
· Local Economic Development Strategy<br />
· Marketing Strategy<br />
· Tourism Development Strategy<br />
· Human Resource Development Strategy<br />
· Formalisation of Cultural & Historical Heritage Sites
31<br />
Integrated Environmental Management Plan<br />
· Environmental Report<br />
· Disaster Management Plan<br />
· Spatial Development Framework<br />
· Land Use Management Systems<br />
Infrastructure Provision and Service Delivery<br />
· Water Master Plan<br />
· Infrastructure Maintenance Plan<br />
· Integrated Waste Management Plan<br />
· Integrated Transport Plan<br />
Community Participation and IGR<br />
· Community Participation Policy<br />
· SDM Communication Strategy<br />
1.1.5. POWERS AND FUNCTIONS<br />
The SDM has assumed responsibilities in several powers, duties and functions at the local<br />
municipalities due to capacity and establishment constraints. Functions such as water and<br />
sanitation, waste management and disaster management are the responsibilities of the district.<br />
Local Municipalities are considered as the low capacity municipalities. The district must devise a<br />
long-term capacitating strategy for the concerned municipalities to enable them to perform these<br />
functions.<br />
• Water<br />
• Sanitation<br />
• Fire fighting<br />
• Local Tourism<br />
• Municipal Airport except for Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi<br />
• Municipal Planning<br />
• Municipal Health Services<br />
• Municipal Public Transport
32<br />
• Markets<br />
• Municipal Roads for Fetakgomo<br />
• Storm water for Tubatse, Makhuduthamaga and Fetakgomo<br />
• Cemeteries except for Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi<br />
• Municipal Abattoirs<br />
• Refuse removal, refuse dumps and solid waste disposal for Fetakgomo<br />
The powers and functions are reviewed annually after capacity assessments by the Municipal<br />
Demarcation Board, which informs MEC Adjustment Report. The above powers and functions refer<br />
to MEC Adjustment report of the 2008/09 Financial Year – which do not necessarily reflect the<br />
current situation.<br />
Municipal Demarcation Board is currently reviewing the whole Capacity Assessment Model,<br />
considering the following limitations:<br />
- Clarity on underlying processes and drivers of the model: a primary concern relating to<br />
the approach is that the detail underlying the model is not fully explained. The reader or<br />
user of the model (which could include the MEC or other provincial representatives) is not<br />
provided with the relevant information to fully understand which variables inform the<br />
determination of whether a municipality has capacity or not. Furthermore it is not clear what<br />
processes were followed in reaching the determination of capacity levels.<br />
- Limitations related to the conceptualisation of capacity: the concern with this approach<br />
is that the model lacks a robust and comprehensive basis upon which to inform a) the<br />
assessment and understanding of capacity levels within and across municipalities and b)<br />
make recommendations for the adjustment of powers and functions.<br />
- Measurement and interpretation issues: it fails to assess the ability to spend, which is<br />
one indicator of a municipality‘s capacity to deliver services and perform functions,<br />
insufficient understanding of the extent of capacity shortcomings, there is a need to assess<br />
actual capacity levels in addition to asking about perceived access to resources.<br />
- Assessing performance: lack of benchmarks against which to assess, lack of<br />
differentiation, insufficient scope for understanding the ‘why’
33<br />
- Limitations of quantitative assessments: The quality of the data is highly dependent on<br />
the measurements used and the extent to which the indicators link to a clearly defined<br />
conceptual framework.<br />
The explanatory power of quantitative data is limited to the variables being tested in the<br />
survey. Because surveys focus on narrow, highly specified areas of inquiry and rely on<br />
structured responses mainly, they are highly limited in terms of the detail they provide and<br />
by their very design are not meant to provide depth and breadth.<br />
It is therefore prudent that powers be approached cautiously as a guide than being instructive.
1.2. MEC’S COMMENTS<br />
MEC for Local Government and Housing’s Comments on 2012/13 <strong>IDP</strong> review<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREAS BROAD DISTRICT FINDINGS GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
KPA 1. Spatial Rationale<br />
All municipalities in the district have indicated their spatial<br />
analysis information and hierarchy of settlements, spatial<br />
strategic objectives, projects and Spatial Development<br />
Frameworks (SDFs) and all the local municipalities<br />
indicated their Land Use Management Schemes (LUMS)<br />
All municipalities should continue to indicate their spatial analysis<br />
information and hierarchy of settlements, spatial strategic objectives,<br />
projects and Spatial Development Frameworks (SDFs) and all the local<br />
municipalities indicated their Land Use Management Schemes (LUMS)<br />
KPA 2: Infrastructure and Basic Service Delivery<br />
Water and sanitation<br />
Energy and Electricity<br />
Roads, Storm Water Drainage and<br />
Public Transport<br />
All municipalities have indicated their water and sanitation<br />
challenges and backlogs, strategic objectives and<br />
strategies, projects. All municipalities in the district have<br />
not mention the availability of the <strong>District</strong>’s Water Services<br />
Development Plan in their <strong>IDP</strong>s.<br />
All municipalities have clearly indicated their electricity<br />
backlogs as well as the provision of Free Basic Electricity<br />
(FBE). They further highlighted their strategic objectives<br />
and strategies as well as energy projects. However, they<br />
did not indicate Energy Master Plans as they are not<br />
performing the electricity provisioning function.<br />
All municipalities have indicated their backlogs on roads,<br />
storm water drainage and public transport challenges.<br />
They have also outlined their strategic objectives,<br />
strategies and funded projects. Greater <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> and<br />
Ephraim Mogale have Roads Master Plans, whereas<br />
Makhuduthamaga has a Draft Roads Master Plan.<br />
All Municipalities should continue to highlight their water and sanitation<br />
challenges and backlogs in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review. All municipalities in the<br />
district should indicate that their water and sanitation issues are<br />
addressed by the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> through the <strong>District</strong><br />
Water Services Development Plan (WSDP) in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review.<br />
All municipalities should continue to highlight electricity backlogs as well<br />
as the provision of Free Basic Electricity (FBE). They should also<br />
indicate electricity strategic objectives and strategies as well as projects<br />
in the next review . <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should liaise with<br />
Eskom for the development of district-wide framework for the provision<br />
of electricity and assist local municipalities with development of the<br />
Energy Master Plans.<br />
All municipalities should keep on reflecting their roads, storm water<br />
drainage and public transport challenges, strategic objectives, strategies<br />
and funded projects as well as classification on road network in the next<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> review. Municipalities with appropriate powers and function should<br />
develop and adopt Roads Master Plans in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review.
35<br />
Waste Management<br />
KPA 3:Local Economic Development<br />
KPA 4: Good Governance and<br />
Public Participation<br />
KPA 5: Financial Viability<br />
KPA 6: Municipal Transformation &<br />
Organizational Development<br />
All municipalities in the district have provided a clear and<br />
coherent analysis on waste management, strategic<br />
objectives, strategies and funded projects. All<br />
municipalities in the district have indicated the availability<br />
of Integrated Waste Management Plans.<br />
All municipalities in the district have provided a clear and<br />
coherent economic analysis, LED strategic objectives and<br />
strategies, and funded projects and LED Strategies in their<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>s. It is, however, noted that these strategies are<br />
outdated. The strategies for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> and<br />
Ephraim Mogale Municipalities were developed in 2008,<br />
whereas those of Makhuduthamaga, Elias Motsoaledi and<br />
Greater Tubatse (which is a Provincial Growth Point) were<br />
developed in 2007.<br />
All municipalities in the district have provided a clear<br />
analysis of good governance issues, strategic objectives<br />
and strategies, as well as funded projects. However, the<br />
Makhuduthamaga <strong>Municipality</strong> did not indicate the<br />
existence of Supply Chain Committee, Complaints<br />
Management System as well as the Risk Management<br />
Strategy.<br />
All municipalities have provided a clear and coherent<br />
analysis of their financial capacities and challenges,<br />
strategic objectives and strategies, funded projects 3 Year<br />
MTEF.<br />
All municipalities have provided a clear and coherent<br />
analysis of their institutional capacities and challenges,<br />
strategic objectives and objectives, funded projects.<br />
However, the municipalities in the district did not indicate<br />
the availability of Municipal Institutional Plan<br />
All municipalities should maintain the status quo by indicating waste<br />
management challenges, backlogs, strategic objectives and strategies<br />
as well as funded projects and Integrated Waste Management Plan in<br />
the next <strong>IDP</strong> review.<br />
All municipalities in the district should continue to provide a clear and<br />
coherent economic analysis of their municipal areas, strategic objectives<br />
and strategies, funded projects and LED Strategies in the next <strong>IDP</strong><br />
review. It is also recommended that municipalities review their LED<br />
Strategies and align them with the LEGDP, New Growth Path and the<br />
National Development Plan during the next <strong>IDP</strong> review.<br />
All municipalities should continue to provide a clear analysis of good<br />
governance issues, strategic objectives and strategies as well as funded<br />
good governance and public participation projects in the next <strong>IDP</strong><br />
review.<br />
All municipalities should maintain the status quo by providing a clear<br />
and coherent analysis of their financial capacities and challenges,<br />
strategic objectives and strategies, funded projects, 3 Year MTEF as<br />
well as the 5 Financial Plans in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review.<br />
All municipalities should continue to provide a clear and coherent<br />
analysis of their institutional capacities and challenges, strategic<br />
objectives and objectives, funded projects in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review. All<br />
municipalities should review and highlight their Municipal Institutional<br />
Plans in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review in liaison with COGHSTA, SALGA and<br />
DBSA.
36<br />
1.3. AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORT<br />
Auditor-general’s report to the Limpopo provincial legislature and the council on <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
district municipality report on the financial statements<br />
Introduction<br />
1. I was engaged to audit the financial statements of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>,<br />
which comprise the statement of financial position as at 30 June 2012, the statements of<br />
financial performance, changes in net assets and cash flows for the year then ended,<br />
and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and<br />
the accounting authority’s report, as set out in the report.<br />
Accounting Officer’s responsibility for the financial statements<br />
2. The accounting officer is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these<br />
financial statements in accordance with South African Standards of Generally<br />
Recognised Accounting Practice (SA Standards of GRAP) and the requirements of the<br />
Municipal Finance Management Act of South Africa, 2003 (Act No. 56 of 2003) (MFMA),<br />
Division of Revenue Act, 2011 (Act No. 6 of 2011) (DoRA) and for such internal control<br />
as the accounting officer determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial<br />
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.<br />
Auditor-General’s responsibility<br />
3. My responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on<br />
conducting the audit in accordance with the Public Audit Act of South Africa, 2004 (Act<br />
No. 25 of 2004) (PAA), the General Notice issued in terms thereof and International<br />
Standards on Auditing. Because of the matters described in the Basis for disclaimer of<br />
opinion paragraphs, I was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to<br />
provide a basis for an audit opinion.<br />
Basis for disclaimer of opinion<br />
Commitments<br />
4. Included in commitments of R416 755 179 as disclosed in note 33 to the financial<br />
statements is R24 110 654 for which no supporting documentation could be provided.<br />
The municipality’s records did not permit the application of alternative audit procedures.<br />
Consequently, I was unable to determine whether any adjustments to commitments were<br />
necessary.<br />
General expenditure
37<br />
5. Included in general expenditure of R167 012 250 as disclosed in note 22 to the financial<br />
statements, are payments amounting to R5 349 013 accounted for in the current<br />
financial year that related to the 2010-11 financial year. Consequently general<br />
expenditure is overstated by R5 349 013 and surplus for the period is understated by the<br />
same amount.<br />
6. I was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence for the restatement in the<br />
corresponding figure of general expenditure. As described in note 22 to the financial<br />
statements, the restatement of R22 252 342 was made in order to rectify a prior year<br />
misstatement. I was unable to confirm the restatement by alternative means.<br />
Consequently, I was unable to determine whether any adjustments to the general<br />
expenditure corresponding figure were necessary.<br />
Property, plant and equipment<br />
7. Included in property, plant and equipment of R3 418 051 670 as disclosed in note 3 to<br />
the financial statements, is an amount of R3 007 852 <strong>23</strong>6 relating to opening balances<br />
for which no supporting documentation could be provided. The municipality’s records did<br />
not permit the application of alternative audit procedures. Consequently, I was unable to<br />
determine whether any adjustments to the property, plant and equipment in the financial<br />
statements were necessary.<br />
8. The municipality could not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support work<br />
in progress of R9 878 412 (2011: R1 458 871). Consequently I did not obtain sufficient<br />
appropriate audit evidence to satisfy myself as to the valuation, existence and<br />
classification of projects in progress of R9 878 412 (2011: R1 458 871).<br />
9. The municipality did not unbundle the infrastructure assets stated at R15 257 307 in<br />
accordance with SA Standards of GRAP 17, Property, plant and equipment.<br />
Consequently, I was unable to determine whether any adjustments to the property, plant<br />
and equipment in the financial statements were necessary.<br />
10. The municipality did not review the residual values and useful lives of property, plant and<br />
equipment at each reporting date in accordance with SA Standards of GRAP 17,<br />
Property, plant and equipment. The municipality’s records did not permit the application<br />
of alternative audit procedures. Consequently, the impact on the carrying value of<br />
property, plant and equipment and the corresponding effect on accumulated surplus in<br />
terms of SA Standards of GRAP 3, Accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates<br />
and errors as disclosed in the statement of financial position could not be determined.<br />
11. Roads and storm water assets of R836 580 893, as disclosed in note 3 to the financial<br />
statements, does not agree to the balance of R1 300 190 473 per the fixed asset<br />
register. The municipality did not reconcile the difference of R463 609 580 between the<br />
financial statements and the underlying records. Consequently, depreciation is<br />
understated and the surplus for the year is overstated by R463 609 580.
38<br />
12. SA Standards of GRAP 17, Property, plant and equipment requires that subsequent to<br />
initial recognition at cost, an item of property, plant and equipment should be carried at<br />
cost less accumulated depreciation less accumulated impairment losses. The<br />
municipality did not calculate or consider impairment losses on its infrastructure assets.<br />
Consequently, I was unable to determine whether any adjustments to the property, plant<br />
and equipment in the financial statements were necessary.<br />
Depreciation<br />
13. Depreciation stated at R62 269 407, as disclosed in note 28 to the financial statements,<br />
does not agree to the balance of R68 792 882 per the fixed asset register. The<br />
municipality did not reconcile the difference of R6 5<strong>23</strong> 475 between the financial<br />
statements and the underlying records. Consequently, depreciation is understated and<br />
the surplus for the year is overstated by R6 5<strong>23</strong> 475.<br />
Trade payables<br />
<strong>14</strong>. The municipality could not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence to substantiate<br />
trade payables amounting to R81 876 358 and as disclosed in note 17 to the financial<br />
statement. There was no system of control to reconcile the supplier statements with the<br />
payments made. The municipality’s records did not permit the application of alternative<br />
audit procedures regarding the trade payables account. Consequently, I was unable to<br />
determine whether any adjustments to the trade payables in the financial statements<br />
were necessary.<br />
Irregular expenditure<br />
15. No system was in place for the identification and recognition of irregular expenditure and<br />
there were no satisfactory alternative audit procedures that I could perform to obtain<br />
reasonable assurance that all irregular expenditure was properly recorded. Payments<br />
amounting to R82 743 432 were made in contravention of the supply chain management<br />
regulations. The amount was not included in irregular expenditure, disclosed in note 40<br />
to the financial statements. Furthermore, the municipality could not provide sufficient<br />
appropriate audit evidence to prove that the allocation of contracts amounting to<br />
R26 220 687 were awarded in accordance with supply chain management regulations.<br />
Consequently, I was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to satisfy<br />
myself as to the completeness of irregular expenditure as disclosed in note 40 to the<br />
financial statements amounting to R63 <strong>14</strong>4 022 (2012) and R215 878 250 (2011).<br />
Value Added Tax (VAT)<br />
16. The municipality entered into an agency agreement with its local municipalities for the<br />
provision of water services. As the principal, the municipality has not accounted for VAT<br />
on the water transactions in contravention with the VAT act. The municipality did not
39<br />
account for input tax on the agency fees for the services rendered in contravention with<br />
VAT act.<br />
17. Furthermore no supporting documentation could be provided for VAT accruals of<br />
R15 126 700. The municipality’s records did not permit the application of alternative<br />
procedures regarding the VAT disclosed in the financial statements. Consequently, I was<br />
unable to determine the correct amount of the VAT receivable balance of R32 083 617<br />
(2012) and R105 094 421 (2011) as disclosed in note 10 to the financial statements.<br />
Presentation and disclosure of financial statements<br />
18. SA Standards of GRAP 1, Presentation of financial statements, paragraph 19 (b) and (c)<br />
requires that financial statements should provide information, including accounting<br />
policies, presented in a manner which is relevant, reliable, comparable and<br />
understandable. In addition, additional disclosures should be made when compliance<br />
with the specific requirements in SA Standards of GRAP are insufficient to enable users<br />
to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the<br />
entity’s financial position and financial performance. The following non compliances were<br />
identified:<br />
· Budget information as required by SA Standards of GRAP 1 has been disclosed<br />
in Appendix E1 to the financial statements, no reference has been made of this in<br />
a note to the financial statements as required by SA Standards of GRAP.<br />
· Councillors remuneration has not been disclosed in terms of section 124(1)(a)<br />
and (b) of the MFMA.<br />
· Financial risk management as required by IAS 32, financial instruments:<br />
Disclosure and presentation was not disclosed in the annual financial statements.<br />
Distribution losses<br />
19. Section 125 (2) (d) (i) of the MFMA requires that the notes to the annual financial<br />
statements of a municipality must disclose the particulars of any material losses.<br />
Contrary to these requirements, the municipality did not disclose the water distribution<br />
losses as required by the MFMA.<br />
Disclaimer of opinion<br />
20. Because of the significance of the matters described in the Basis for disclaimer of<br />
opinion paragraphs, I have not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence<br />
to provide a basis for an audit opinion. Accordingly, I do not express an opinion on the<br />
financial statements.<br />
Emphasis of matters
40<br />
21. I draw attention to the matters below. My opinion is not modified in respect of these<br />
matters<br />
Restatement of corresponding figures<br />
22. As disclosed in note 36 to the financial statements, the corresponding figures for<br />
30 June 2011 have been restated as a result of an error discovered during 2012 in the<br />
financial statements of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> at, and for the year ended,<br />
30 June 2011.<br />
Material impairments<br />
<strong>23</strong>. As disclosed in note 26 to the financial statements, material impairments to the amount<br />
of R11 632 340 were incurred as a result of impairment of irrecoverable trade debtors.<br />
Additional matter<br />
24. I draw attention to the matter below. My opinion is not modified in respect of this matter:<br />
Unaudited supplementary schedules<br />
25. The supplementary information set out on pages X to X does not form part of the<br />
financial statements and is presented as additional information. I have not audited these<br />
schedules and, accordingly, I do not express an opinion thereon.<br />
Planned targets not achieved<br />
26. Of the total number of planned targets, 170 targets were not achieved during the year<br />
under review. This represents 79% of total planned targets that were not achieved during<br />
the year under review. This was mainly due to the fact that targets were planned for<br />
during the strategic planning process before the required funds were secured.<br />
REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />
27. In accordance with the PAA and the General Notice issued in terms thereof, I report the<br />
following findings relevant to performance against predetermined objectives, compliance<br />
with laws and regulations and internal control, but not for the purpose of expressing an<br />
opinion.<br />
Predetermined objectives<br />
28. I performed procedures to obtain evidence about the usefulness and reliability of the<br />
information in the annual performance report as set out on pages XX to XX of the annual<br />
report.
41<br />
29. The reported performance against predetermined objectives was evaluated against the<br />
overall criteria of usefulness and reliability. The usefulness of information in the annual<br />
performance report relates to whether it is presented in accordance with the National<br />
Treasury annual reporting principles and whether the reported performance is consistent<br />
with the planned development priorities. The usefulness of information further relates to<br />
whether indicators and targets are measurable (i.e. well defined, verifiable, specific,<br />
measurable and time bound) and relevant as required by the National Treasury<br />
Framework for managing programme performance information (FMPPI).<br />
The reliability of the information in respect of the selected development priorities is assessed<br />
to determine whether it adequately reflects the facts (i.e. whether it is valid, accurate and<br />
complete).<br />
30. The material findings are as follows<br />
Usefulness of information<br />
Presentation<br />
Measures taken to improve performance not disclosed<br />
31. Improvement measures in the annual performance report for a total of 100% of the<br />
planned targets not achieved were not disclosed as required by section 46 of the<br />
Municipal Systems Act (MSA). These targets related to the development priorities on<br />
access to basic services and infrastructure development, community development and<br />
social cohesion, and economic growth, development and job creation, effective,<br />
accountable and clean government, active community participation and<br />
intergovernmental co-operation, and the spatial development and sustainable land use.<br />
This was due to inadequate monitoring done to identify the root causes of the underperformance.<br />
Consistency<br />
Reported objectives, indicators and targets not consistent with planned objectives,<br />
indicators and targets<br />
32. The MSA, section 41(c) requires that the actual achievements against all planned<br />
indicators and targets must be reported annually. The annual performance report<br />
submitted for audit purposes did not include the actual performance of 100% of the<br />
reported objectives, 43% of the related performance indicators and 40% of the related<br />
performance targets specified in the integrated development plan for the year under<br />
review. This was due to lack of or limited information systems recording and<br />
documenting of actual achievements against targets. This is the result of management<br />
not having properly reviewed the reported objectives, indicators and targets to ensure<br />
that they are consistent with the integrated development plan.<br />
Measurability<br />
Performance indicators are not well defined
42<br />
33. The National Treasury’s FMPPI requires that performance indicators should have clear<br />
and unambiguous data definitions so that data can be collected consistently and is easy<br />
to understand and use. A total of 61% of performance indicators for the development<br />
priorities on access to basic services and infrastructure development, community<br />
development and social cohesion, and economic growth, development and job creation<br />
were not well defined in that clear, unambiguous data definitions were not available to<br />
allow for data to be collected consistently. This was due to the fact that management<br />
was aware of the requirements of the FMPPI but did not receive the necessary training<br />
to enable application of the principles.<br />
Reliability of information<br />
Reported performance not valid<br />
34. The National Treasury’s FMPPI requires that processes and systems which produce the<br />
indicator should be verifiable. A total of 60% of the actual reported performance relevant<br />
to the selected objectives on access to basic services and infrastructure development,<br />
community development and social cohesion, and economic growth, development and<br />
job creation were not valid or differed materially when compared to the source<br />
information and/or evidence provided. This was due to a lack of standard operating<br />
procedures for the recording of actual achievements and proper monitoring of<br />
performance.<br />
Reported performance not accurate<br />
35. The FMPPI requires that the indicator be accurate enough for its intended use and<br />
respond to changes in the level of performance. A total of 60% of the actual reported<br />
performance relevant to the selected objectives on access to basic services and<br />
infrastructure development, community development and social cohesion, and economic<br />
growth, development and job creation were not accurate when compared to source<br />
information. This was due to a lack of standard operating procedures for the recording of<br />
actual achievements and proper monitoring of performance.<br />
Compliance with laws and regulations<br />
36. I performed procedures to obtain evidence that the entity has complied with applicable<br />
laws and regulations regarding financial matters, financial management and other related<br />
matters. My findings on material non-compliance with specific matters in key applicable<br />
laws and regulations as set out in the General Notice issued in terms of the PAA are as<br />
follows:<br />
Strategic planning and performance management
43<br />
37. The parent municipality with sole control of a municipal entity did not ensure that annual<br />
performance objectives and indicators for the municipal entity are established by<br />
agreement with the municipal entity as required by section 93B(a) of the MSA.<br />
38. The municipality did not:<br />
· set appropriate key performance indicators as a yardstick for measuring<br />
performance, including outcomes and impact, with regard to the municipality’s<br />
development priorities and objectives set out in its integrated development plan,<br />
· set measurable performance targets with regard to each development<br />
priority/objective and monitor performance, with regard to each of those<br />
development priorities and objectives and against the key performance indicators<br />
and targets set<br />
· measure and review performance at least once per year, with regard to each of<br />
those development priorities and objectives and against the key performance<br />
indicators and targets set<br />
· take steps to improve performance with regard to those development priorities<br />
and objectives where performance targets are not met as required by section 41<br />
of the MSA.<br />
Annual financial statements, performance and annual report<br />
39. The financial statements submitted for auditing were not prepared in all material respects<br />
in accordance with the requirements of section 122 of the MFMA.<br />
40. Material misstatements of non-current assets, current assets, liabilities, revenue,<br />
expenditure, and disclosure items identified by the auditors in the submitted financial<br />
statements were subsequently corrected and the supporting records were provided<br />
subsequently, but the uncorrected material misstatements and supporting records that<br />
could not be provided resulted in the financial statements receiving a disclaimer audit<br />
opinion.<br />
41. The accounting officer did not submit the financial statements for auditing within two<br />
months after the end of the financial year, as required by section 126(1)(a) of the MFMA.<br />
42. The annual performance report for the year under review does not include a comparison<br />
of the performance with set targets and a comparison with the previous financial year<br />
measures taken to improve performance, as required by section 46 (1)(a), (b)and (c) of<br />
the MSA.<br />
Procurement and contract management<br />
43. Sufficient appropriate audit evidence could not be obtained that goods and services with<br />
a transaction value of below R200 000 were procured by means of obtaining the required<br />
price quotations, as required by Supply Chain Management (SCM) regulation 17(a) and<br />
(c)
44<br />
44. Invitations for competitive bidding were not always advertised for a required minimum<br />
period of <strong>14</strong> days, as required by SCM regulation 22(1) and 22(2).<br />
45. Sufficient appropriate audit evidence could not be obtained that bids were evaluated by<br />
bid evaluation committees which were composed of officials from the departments<br />
requiring the goods or services and at least one SCM practitioner of the municipality as<br />
required by SCM regulation 28(2).<br />
46. Sufficient appropriate audit evidence could not be obtained that contracts and quotations<br />
were awarded to bidders based on points given for criteria that were stipulated in the<br />
original invitation for bidding and quotations, as required by SCM regulations 21(b) and<br />
28(1)(a) and Preferential Procurement Regulations.<br />
47. Construction projects were not always registered with the Construction Industry<br />
Development Board (CIDB), as required by section 22 of the CIDB Act and CIDB<br />
regulation 18.<br />
48. Contracts were awarded to bidders who did not submit a declaration on whether they are<br />
employed by the state or connected to any person employed by the state, as required by<br />
SCM regulation 13(c).<br />
49. Awards were made to providers who are persons in service of other state institutions, in<br />
contravention of SCM regulation 44. Similar awards were identified in the prior year and<br />
no effective steps were taken to prevent or combat the abuse of the SCM process in<br />
accordance with SCM regulation 38(1).<br />
Expenditure management<br />
50. Sufficient appropriate audit evidence could not be obtained that money owing by the<br />
municipality had always been paid within 30 days of receiving an invoice or statement,<br />
as required by section 65(2)(e) of the MFMA.<br />
51. The accounting officer did not take effective steps to prevent unauthorised expenditure,<br />
irregular expenditure and fruitless and wasteful expenditure, as required by section 62(1)<br />
(d) of the MFMA.<br />
52. An adequate management, accounting and information system was not in place which<br />
recognised expenditure when it was incurred, accounted for creditors and accounted for<br />
payments made, as required by section 65(2)(b) of the MFMA.<br />
Asset management<br />
53. An adequate management, accounting and information system which accounts for<br />
assets was not in place, as required by section 63(2)(a) of the MFMA.
45<br />
54. An effective system of internal control for assets was not in place, as required by section<br />
63(2) (c) of the MFMA.<br />
Liability management<br />
55. An effective system of internal control for liabilities (including a liability register) was not<br />
in place, as required by section 63(2) (c) of the MFMA.<br />
INTERNAL CONTROL<br />
56. I considered internal control relevant to my audit of the financial statements, annual<br />
performance report and compliance with laws and regulations. The matters reported<br />
below under the fundamentals of internal control are limited to the significant deficiencies<br />
that resulted in findings on the annual performance report and the findings on<br />
compliance with laws and regulations included in this report.<br />
Leadership<br />
· The accounting officer did not exercise oversight responsibility over compliance with<br />
laws and regulations and reporting on predetermined objectives and the enforcement<br />
of supply chain management regulations.<br />
· The accounting officer did not establish an IT governance framework that supports<br />
and enables service delivery.<br />
· Management did not implement effective HR management to ensure that adequate<br />
and sufficiently skilled resources are in place and that performance is monitored.<br />
Financial and performance management<br />
· The accounting officer did not implement proper record keeping in a timely manner to<br />
ensure that complete, relevant and accurate information is accessible and available<br />
to support financial and performance reporting.<br />
· The accounting officer did not implement adequate controls over daily and monthly<br />
processing and reconciling of transactions.<br />
· The accounting officer did not prepare regular, accurate and complete financial<br />
reports that are supported and evidenced by reliable information.<br />
· Management did not design and implement formal controls over IT systems to<br />
ensure the reliability of the systems and the availability, accuracy and protection of<br />
information.<br />
· Standard operating procedures for performance information are not comprehensively<br />
documented.<br />
Governance
46<br />
· Management ineffectiveness in implementing recommendations from internal and<br />
external audit did not enable the audit committee to promote accountability and<br />
service delivery through evaluating and monitoring responses to risks and providing<br />
oversight over the effectiveness of the internal control environment, including<br />
financial and performance reporting and compliance with laws and regulations.<br />
OTHER REPORTS<br />
Investigations<br />
57. An investigation is being conducted to probe possible supply chain management<br />
irregularities. The investigation aims to establish whether the supply chain management<br />
process has been implemented in terms of the prescribed supply chain management<br />
process. The investigation was still on-going at the reporting date.
AUDIT ACTION PLAN FOR 2011/2012 AUDIT REPORT BY SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />
Finances<br />
Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />
Person<br />
Target Date<br />
Progress<br />
4 Included in commitments of<br />
R416 755 179 as disclosed in<br />
note 33 to the financial<br />
statements is R24 110 654 for<br />
which no supporting<br />
documentation could be<br />
provided.<br />
· <strong>Review</strong> the commitment<br />
listing against allocated<br />
budget vs budget expended<br />
to date.<br />
· Ensure that supporting<br />
documentation for budget<br />
expended to date exists.<br />
· Search for documents that<br />
were not submitted during the<br />
audit<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong>
48<br />
Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />
Person<br />
Target Date<br />
Progress<br />
5 Included in general expenditure<br />
of R167 012 250 as disclosed in<br />
note 22 to the financial<br />
statements, are payments<br />
amounting to R5 349 013<br />
accounted for in the current<br />
financial year that related to the<br />
2010-11 financial year.<br />
Consequently<br />
general<br />
expenditure is overstated by R5<br />
349 013 and surplus for the<br />
period is understated by the<br />
same amount.<br />
6 I was unable to obtain sufficient<br />
appropriate audit evidence for<br />
the restatement in the<br />
corresponding figure of general<br />
expenditure. As described in<br />
note 22 to the financial<br />
statements, the restatement of<br />
R22 252 342 was made in order<br />
to rectify a prior year<br />
misstatement.<br />
7 Included in property, plant and<br />
equipment of R3 418 051 670<br />
as disclosed in note 3 to the<br />
· Check the whole population<br />
for similar transactions<br />
· Correct the error as required<br />
by GRAP 3/ restate the<br />
financial statements<br />
· Part of accumulated surplus<br />
reconciliation<br />
· <strong>Review</strong> the adjusting journals<br />
passed<br />
· Confirm the authenticity of the<br />
journal<br />
· Compile supporting<br />
documents for the journal<br />
Appointment of the service provider<br />
to address the following:<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong>
49<br />
Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />
Person<br />
Target Date<br />
Progress<br />
financial statements, is an<br />
amount of R3 007 852 <strong>23</strong>6<br />
relating to opening balances for<br />
which no supporting<br />
documentation could be<br />
provided<br />
· Ensure that developed<br />
methodology on recognition,<br />
fair valuing and write down is<br />
discussed with AG(SA)<br />
· Write down assets recognized<br />
as at 30 June 2009<br />
· Recognition and fair valuing<br />
of all infrastructure assets<br />
acquired prior 30 June 2009<br />
8 The municipality could not<br />
provide sufficient appropriate<br />
audit evidence to support work<br />
in progress of R9 878 412<br />
(2011: R1 458 871<br />
· Locate outstanding<br />
documents for 2010/11 and<br />
2011/12.<br />
· Contact service providers for<br />
provision of outstanding<br />
documentation<br />
· Alternative procedure to be<br />
followed for valuation where<br />
supporting documents cannot<br />
be located<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
9 The municipality did not<br />
unbundle the infrastructure<br />
assets stated at R15 257 307 in<br />
accordance with SA Standards<br />
· Unbudle Ratau and Tjebeng<br />
projects and projects<br />
completed within the current<br />
financial year (2012/<strong>2013</strong>)<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong>
50<br />
Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />
Person<br />
Target Date<br />
Progress<br />
of GRAP 17, Property, plant and<br />
equipment.<br />
· Reconcile unbundled report<br />
for Ratau and Tjebeng with<br />
FAR.<br />
10 The municipality did not review<br />
the residual values and useful<br />
lives of property, plant and<br />
equipment at each reporting<br />
date in accordance with SA<br />
Standards of GRAP 17,<br />
Property, plant and equipment.<br />
· <strong>Review</strong> and assess estimated<br />
useful and economic lives of<br />
property plant and equipment<br />
· Determine the residual<br />
values of property, plant and<br />
equipment<br />
· Update the accounting policy<br />
of the municipality<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
11 Roads and storm water assets<br />
of R836 580 893, as disclosed<br />
in note 3 to the financial<br />
statements, does not agree to<br />
the balance of R1 300 190 473<br />
per the fixed asset register. The<br />
municipality did not reconcile the<br />
difference of R463 609 580<br />
between the financial<br />
statements and the underlying<br />
records. Consequently,<br />
depreciation is understated and<br />
· Determine roads and land<br />
reserves owned by district<br />
through inspection of RAL<br />
asset register<br />
· Conduct deeds search at<br />
Deeds office for registered<br />
title deeds and servitudes<br />
owned by municipality<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong>
51<br />
Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />
Person<br />
Target Date<br />
Progress<br />
the surplus for the year is<br />
overstated by R463 609 580<br />
12 The municipality did not<br />
calculate or consider impairment<br />
losses on its infrastructure<br />
assets.<br />
· Draft impairment guideline to<br />
determine impairment<br />
indicators<br />
· Assess all assets for<br />
impairment<br />
· Disclose it properly on the<br />
Annual Financial Statement<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
13 Depreciation stated at<br />
R62 269 407, as disclosed in<br />
note 28 to the financial<br />
statements, does not agree to<br />
the balance of R68 792 882 per<br />
the fixed asset register. The<br />
municipality did not reconcile the<br />
difference of R6 5<strong>23</strong> 475<br />
between the financial<br />
statements and the underlying<br />
records.<br />
<strong>14</strong> The municipality could not<br />
provide sufficient appropriate<br />
audit evidence to substantiate<br />
trade payables amounting to<br />
· Recalculation of depreciation<br />
on movable and immovable<br />
assets<br />
· Restate the error in terms of<br />
GRAP 3<br />
· Confirm the configuration of<br />
creditors sub ledger on the<br />
system<br />
· Reconcile the sub-ledger and<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong>
52<br />
Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />
Person<br />
Target Date<br />
Progress<br />
R81 876 358 and as disclosed<br />
in note 17 to the financial<br />
statement. There was no system<br />
of control to reconcile the<br />
supplier statements with the<br />
payments made.<br />
the general ledger<br />
· Request statements of all<br />
creditors balance reported at<br />
year end<br />
· Reconcile suppliers statement<br />
with creditors sub ledger<br />
15 No system was in place for the<br />
identification and recognition of<br />
irregular expenditure and there<br />
were no satisfactory alternative<br />
audit procedures that I could<br />
perform to obtain reasonable<br />
assurance that all irregular<br />
expenditure was properly<br />
recorded. Payments amounting<br />
to R82 743 432 were made in<br />
contravention of the supply<br />
chain management regulations.<br />
The amount was not included in<br />
irregular expenditure, disclosed<br />
in note 40 to the financial<br />
statements. Furthermore, the<br />
municipality could not provide<br />
sufficient appropriate audit<br />
evidence to prove that the<br />
· Audit on all SCM documents<br />
for 2010/11 and 2011/12 by<br />
internal audit<br />
· Confirm with CIPRO that<br />
potential service providers are<br />
not employees in service of<br />
the state<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong>
53<br />
Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />
Person<br />
Target Date<br />
Progress<br />
allocation of contracts<br />
amounting to R26 220 687 were<br />
awarded in accordance with<br />
supply chain management<br />
regulations<br />
16 The municipality entered into an<br />
agency agreement with its local<br />
municipalities for the provision<br />
of water services. As the<br />
principal, the municipality has<br />
not accounted for VAT on the<br />
water transactions in<br />
contravention with the VAT act.<br />
The municipality did not account<br />
for input tax on the agency fees<br />
for the services rendered in<br />
contravention with VAT act.<br />
17 No supporting documentation<br />
could be provided for VAT<br />
accruals of R15 126 700.<br />
· Budget information as required<br />
by SA Standards of GRAP 1 has<br />
been disclosed in Appendix E1<br />
to the financial statements, no<br />
· Engage SARS on the issue of<br />
VAT on water and sanitation<br />
transactions(Principal/Agency<br />
)<br />
· Disclose the VAT on water<br />
and sanitation in the books of<br />
the district<br />
· <strong>Review</strong> the VAT<br />
reconciliations and ensure<br />
supporting documents are<br />
attached to the reconciliation<br />
· Disclose budget information<br />
as required by GRAP<br />
· Explanation of material<br />
variances<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
15 June <strong>2013</strong>
54<br />
Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />
Person<br />
Target Date<br />
Progress<br />
reference has been made of this<br />
in a note to the financial<br />
statements as required by SA<br />
Standards of GRAP.<br />
Councillors remuneration has<br />
not been disclosed in terms of<br />
section 124(1)(a) and (b) of the<br />
MFMA.<br />
Financial risk management as<br />
required by IAS 32, Financial<br />
instruments: Disclosure and<br />
presentation was not disclosed<br />
in the annual financial<br />
statements.<br />
· Explanation of budget<br />
adjustments vs approved<br />
budget<br />
· Disclose Councilor’s<br />
remuneration as required by<br />
MFMA<br />
· Amend salary disclosure for<br />
opening and current year<br />
balances<br />
· Disclose financial risk<br />
management in the annual<br />
financial statements<br />
· Distribution loss will be<br />
calculated based on billable<br />
areas<br />
· Inspect bulk supply and<br />
separate billable and unbilled<br />
areas<br />
· Compare consumption for<br />
billable areas against bulk<br />
supply<br />
· Consumption for Unbillable<br />
Section 125 (2)(d)(i) of the<br />
MFMA requires that the notes to<br />
the annual financial statements<br />
of a municipality must disclose<br />
the particulars of any material<br />
losses. Contrary to these<br />
requirements, the municipality<br />
did not disclose the water<br />
distribution losses as required<br />
by the MFMA.<br />
Chief Financial<br />
Officer<br />
30 June <strong>2013</strong>
55<br />
Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />
Person<br />
Target Date<br />
Progress<br />
areas will be disclosed as free<br />
basic water<br />
· Calculate closing stock(<br />
billable and unbilled areas) for<br />
water<br />
· Update Stock count guideline<br />
for water<br />
· Calculate and disclose<br />
distribution losses<br />
· Collect data on villages per<br />
reservoir<br />
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION<br />
Par<br />
Findings as per<br />
Audit Report<br />
Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />
Person<br />
Target Date<br />
Progress<br />
31 Measures taken<br />
to improve<br />
performance not<br />
disclosed<br />
32 Reported<br />
objectives,<br />
indicators<br />
targets<br />
and<br />
not<br />
Measures to<br />
improve<br />
performance will<br />
be included in the<br />
Monthly reporting<br />
Gap analysis<br />
report to be<br />
undertaken<br />
monthly to check<br />
Amos Matjiya 5 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
Amos Matjiya 30 June <strong>2013</strong>
56<br />
consistent<br />
planned<br />
objectives,<br />
indicators<br />
targets<br />
with<br />
and<br />
alignment<br />
33 Performance<br />
indicators are<br />
not well defined<br />
34 Reported<br />
performance not<br />
valid<br />
35 Reported<br />
performance not<br />
accurate<br />
37 & 38 Strategic<br />
planning and<br />
performance<br />
management<br />
42 Annual financial<br />
statements,<br />
Indicators have<br />
been well defined<br />
in 2012/<strong>2013</strong> and<br />
hence forth to<br />
ensure alignment<br />
with FMPPI<br />
Quarterly<br />
reporting on<br />
evidence<br />
provided against<br />
planned targets<br />
Quarterly<br />
monitoring to<br />
ensure accuracy<br />
Inclusion of the<br />
municipal entity in<br />
the municipal<br />
performance<br />
reporting<br />
processes<br />
The matter to be<br />
addressed in<br />
Amos Matjiya 30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
Amos Matjiya 30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
Amos Matjiya 30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
Amos Matjiya 30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />
Amos Matjiya 30 August <strong>2013</strong>
57<br />
performance<br />
and annual<br />
report<br />
56 Internal control<br />
(performance<br />
information)<br />
2011/12 versus<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> and<br />
hence forth<br />
Standard<br />
operating<br />
procedures for<br />
performance<br />
information to be<br />
developed<br />
Amos Matjiya 15 September<br />
<strong>2013</strong>
1.4. PLANNING PROCESS<br />
The review process has addressed recommendations from different stakeholders and<br />
role players together with comments from the MEC’ assessment of the district. It also<br />
takes into cognizance the assessment of the <strong>District</strong>’s performance against the<br />
organizational objectives, the recommendations during public participation, <strong>IDP</strong><br />
engagement processes and also any new information or any change in circumstances<br />
that might have arisen subsequent to the adoption of 2012/13 <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />
The development process is undertaken through the implementation of the <strong>District</strong><br />
Process Plan which all local municipalities must prepare as per legislation. The process<br />
Plans must comply with the <strong>District</strong> <strong>IDP</strong> Framework to ensure proper implementation,<br />
alignment and coordination between the district and local municipalities as outlined in<br />
Section 27 of the Municipal System Act (MSA). Proper alignment between the <strong>District</strong><br />
and its local municipalities was done when <strong>IDP</strong> Framework at the <strong>District</strong> level and<br />
subsequently process plans for all Local Municipalities were compiled and adopted<br />
between June 2012 and August 2012 respectively. The process and schedule followed<br />
during the development process as stipulated in the <strong>District</strong> <strong>IDP</strong> Framework is depicted<br />
in the figure below.
59<br />
Figure 3 – Key activities and time frames for <strong>IDP</strong> Process<br />
Adoption phase of Process<br />
Plan/Framework<br />
Identification of community<br />
needs<br />
Identification of community<br />
needs<br />
Quarterly review of 2011/12 of<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget and policies<br />
Consolidation/Presentation of<br />
community needs<br />
Mid-year<br />
performance<br />
review/<strong>IDP</strong>/review/tabling of<br />
adjustment budget<br />
Determination of strategic<br />
objectives for service delivery<br />
and development consolidation<br />
of projects<br />
Presentation of the 1 st<br />
Draft<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget<br />
Submission of the Draft<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget to Management,<br />
Executive Mayor, Portfolio<br />
Committees Mayoral Committee<br />
and Council<br />
Community participation and<br />
stakeholders’ consultation on<br />
the Draft <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget. Public<br />
comments and comments from<br />
other organs of state are taken<br />
into cognizance and where<br />
need be, amendments are<br />
effected to the <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />
Tabling of <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget to<br />
Council for final approval<br />
Executive Mayor signs SDBIP<br />
and performance contracts of<br />
Municipal Manager and Senior<br />
Managers<br />
Budget Process<br />
<strong>July</strong> August September October November December January February March April May June
60<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted a new institutional arrangement in 2010, which<br />
is comprised of the Council, Executive Mayor, Members of Mayoral Committee, Portfolio<br />
Committees, Municipal Manager, Directors, <strong>IDP</strong> Managers, <strong>IDP</strong> Cluster meetings,<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget Steering Committee, Communities and Private Sector. The composition of this<br />
structure is outlined below:<br />
Table 1: Composition of the structure, Roles and Responsibilities<br />
Structure<br />
Roles and Responsibilities<br />
Council - Political decision making body.<br />
- Consider, adopt and approve the developed<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>/budget.<br />
- Ensured alignment of the <strong>IDP</strong>/budget report with<br />
the <strong>District</strong> framework.<br />
- Ensured that all relevant stakeholders are<br />
involved.<br />
- Responsible for the overall management,<br />
coordination and monitoring of the <strong>IDP</strong>/budget<br />
process.<br />
Executive Mayor - Provides political guidance over the budget<br />
process and the priorities that must guide the<br />
preparation of a budget.<br />
- Manages the drafting of the municipality’s<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>/budget.<br />
- Tables the <strong>IDP</strong>/ budget to Council.<br />
Members of Mayoral Committee - Recommend the approval of the <strong>IDP</strong>/budget to<br />
Council.<br />
Municipal Manager - Manages and coordinates the <strong>IDP</strong>/budget<br />
process.<br />
- Ensures that all departments fit in the<br />
organizational vision.<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> Managers - Offer strategic guidance and management to the<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>/budget process.<br />
- Ensures that implementation takes place within<br />
the available resources<br />
- Ensures that all relevant stakeholders are<br />
appropriately involved.<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> Cluster Meetings - Coordinate planning across the <strong>District</strong><br />
- Share common understanding on development<br />
issues<br />
- Facilitate horizontal alignment between and<br />
among municipalities<br />
- Provide support to one another when necessary<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget Steering Committee - Manage the <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget process, including the<br />
process plan<br />
- Determine project prioritization model
61<br />
- Determine projects to be funded<br />
- Determine the public participation models<br />
- Monitor the implementation of projects outlined in<br />
the <strong>IDP</strong><br />
- Present the draft <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget to the Rep Forum<br />
- Present the draft <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget to Mayoral<br />
Committee and to Council for approval<br />
Various Communities - Identify and priorities the needs.<br />
- Discuss and comment on the draft <strong>IDP</strong>/budget<br />
document.<br />
Private Sector - Inclusion of their projects in the <strong>IDP</strong>/budget of the<br />
municipality.<br />
- Provide information on the opportunities that the<br />
communities may have in the private sector.<br />
Stakeholder Engagements and Community Participation<br />
Community participation is an integral part and the heart of integrated development planning<br />
process hence the district and all local municipalities also embark on a programme known as<br />
the Community Outreach Programme.<br />
Community participation is a legislated requirement for development and review of a<br />
municipal <strong>IDP</strong>. Section 16 of the Municipal Systems Act, No. 32 of 2000, requires<br />
municipalities to develop a culture of municipal governance that complements formal<br />
representative government with system of participatory government, and must for this<br />
purpose encourage and create conditions for local community to participate in preparation,<br />
implementation and review of its Integrated Development Plan. It also requires municipalities<br />
to encourage and create conditions for the local community to participate in the affairs of the<br />
municipality.<br />
The organizational structures as outlined above will form part of the methods of community<br />
participation in the <strong>IDP</strong> processes. In addition to these, community consultative meetings will<br />
also be held across the area of the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
Public consultations are held according to the possible scenarios presented below, with<br />
possibility of having them in each half of the financial year – during analysis and after the<br />
draft <strong>IDP</strong>. In the normal circumstances, the <strong>IDP</strong> consultative meetings will be held on two<br />
occasions:<br />
ü First round documenting priority needs of communities and the<br />
ü Second round focusing on presenting the Draft <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget to communities.<br />
A schedule outlining the dates, time and venues of community consultative meetings would<br />
be developed and advertised in the in the regional and local newspapers before<br />
commencement of the meetings.
62<br />
Print media, SDM’s newsletters and electronic media are used to inform the community of<br />
the processes of the <strong>IDP</strong>. Dates of the meeting schedules of the <strong>IDP</strong> processes and other<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> related structures including the Community Outreach Programmes are obtainable from<br />
the <strong>District</strong> on request.<br />
1.5. ALIGNMENT WITH NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN<br />
The National Development Plan has strategies outlined according to following areas, which<br />
should be considered by municipalities for alignment.<br />
WATER AND SANITATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES PROPOSED:<br />
· Establish a national water-resources infrastructure agency<br />
The Department of Water Affairs has identified the actions necessary to reconcile the water<br />
demands of major urban and industrial centres with potential supplies up to 5 2030. These<br />
plans need to be translated into well timed investment programmes to avoid supply<br />
constraints. Large investments in regional systems could be undertaken by a national waterresources<br />
infrastructure agency, perhaps modelled on the South African National Roads<br />
Agency Limited.<br />
This agency would build on the foundation provided by the Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority,<br />
which is already supporting implementation of several large projects, and help to resolve the<br />
organisational challenges faced by the department's Water Trading Entity. However, the<br />
national government, through the Department of Water Affairs, should continue to lead the<br />
planning process, reviewing these programmes every five years to ensure coordination with<br />
other long-term economic and infrastructure plans.<br />
· Reduce demand<br />
Reducing growth in water demand is just as important as increasing its supply. Current<br />
planning assumes it will be possible to achieve an average reduction in water demand of 15<br />
percent below baseline levels in urban areas by 2030. Detailed targets have been set for<br />
different areas. Achieving demand reductions on this scale will require programmes to<br />
reduce water leakage in distribution networks and improve efficient domestic and<br />
commercial water use.<br />
The Commission proposes running a national programme to support local and sectoral<br />
initiatives to reduce water demand and improve water-use efficiency. Demand-management<br />
projects with merit should be given priority and regarded as being on par with water-supply<br />
expansion projects in terms of importance.<br />
· Manage agricultural use better<br />
Agriculture uses the largest volume of water (even though agricultural water supplies are<br />
less reliable than those supplied to urban and industrial users). The farming sector will have<br />
to increase its water efficiency to improve production and allow for water to be transferred to
63<br />
new users in water scarce areas, to compensate for the expansion of irrigated agriculture,<br />
which has high job-creation potential. The Commission proposes a dedicated national<br />
programme to provide support to local and sectoral efforts to reduce water demand and<br />
improve water-use efficiency. Water-saving and demand-management projects should be<br />
considered as part of the overall range of water supply investment programmes. These can<br />
be compared with supply expansion projects, and should be prioritised accordingly, based<br />
on their merits<br />
· Investigate water reuse and desalination<br />
There is already extensive indirect reuse of water in inland areas, where municipal and<br />
industrial waste water is reintroduced into rivers after treatment. However, there is<br />
considerable scope for further water reuse. Many municipalities lack the technical capacity to<br />
build and manage their wastewater treatment systems. As a result, a regional approach to<br />
wastewater management may be required in certain areas. Water infrastructure investment<br />
should include projects to treat and reuse water, selected on their merits. Research into<br />
water reuse and desalination and the skills to operate such technology should be developed,<br />
perhaps under the auspices of a national water-resource infrastructure agency (discussed<br />
below) or the Water Research Commission.<br />
AGRICULTURE AND AGRO-PROCESSING STRATEGY PROPOSALS:<br />
• Substantial investment in irrigation infrastructure, including water storage, distribution<br />
and reticulation throughout the country where the natural resource base allows, as<br />
well as in water-saving technology. A 50 percent increase in land under irrigation<br />
would cost R40 billion in off-farm infrastructure over a 10-year period.<br />
• Greater investment in providing innovative market linkages for small-scale farmers in<br />
communal and land-reform areas.<br />
• As part of comprehensive support packages for farmers, preferential procurement<br />
mechanisms to ensure that new agricultural entrants can also access these markets.<br />
• Tenure security. Farmers will only invest in these areas if they believe that their<br />
income streams from agriculture are secure. Tenure security will secure incomes for<br />
existing farmers at all scales, for new entrants into agriculture, and for the investment<br />
required to grow incomes.<br />
• Technology development. Growth in agricultural production has always been fuelled<br />
by technology, and the returns to investment in agricultural research and<br />
development are high.<br />
• Policy measures to increase intake of fruits and vegetables, and reduce intake of<br />
saturated fats, sugar and salt, as recommended in the South African food dietary<br />
guidelines, to accompany strategies to increase vegetable and fruit production.
64<br />
• Exploration of innovative measures, such as procurement from small-scale farmers<br />
to create local buffer stocks and community-owned emergency services.<br />
MINERALS CLUSTER STRATEGY PROPOSALS:<br />
· Address the major constraints impeding accelerated growth and development of the<br />
mining sector in South Africa. The main interventions include: ensuring certainty in<br />
respect of property rights; passing amendments to the Minerals and Petroleum<br />
Resource Development Act (2002) to ensure a predictable, competitive and stable<br />
mining regulatory framework; secure reliable electricity supply and/or enable firms to<br />
supply their own plant with an estimated potential of 2 500MW by 2015; and secure,<br />
reliable rail services, potentially enabling private participation.<br />
· Develop, deepen and enhance linkages with other sections of the economy. This<br />
includes: linkages with both manufacturers of inputs (capital goods and<br />
consumables) and suppliers of mining-related services; and downstream producers,<br />
especially for platinum-group metals and chrome ore. In this regard, an export tax<br />
could be considered.<br />
· Provide focused research and development support to enable improved extraction<br />
methods that lengthen mine life; better energy efficiency and less water intensity; and<br />
alternative uses of South Africa's extracted minerals, especially platinum-group<br />
metals, titanium and others that have potential for application in new energy systems<br />
and machinery.<br />
· Identify opportunities to increase regional involvement and benefit in the whole<br />
minerals cluster. This could include encouraging the establishment and development<br />
of alternative providers of partially processed intermediate inputs in other countries in<br />
the region.<br />
· Ensure active engagement on, and resolution to, issues raised through the Mining<br />
Industry Growth and Development Task Team process.<br />
· Improve alignment of mining charter requirements to ensure effectiveness in local<br />
communities.<br />
Construction/Infrastructure<br />
Address government's ability to spend its infrastructure budget, particularly with<br />
regard to project-management capacity, long-term planning, and monitoring and<br />
evaluation of both expenditure patterns and construction work.<br />
Support the civil construction and the supplier industries in their export efforts – with<br />
the establishment of a Financial Centre for Africa, and more support in commercial<br />
diplomatic relations.<br />
Intensify support to supplier industries such as building supplies, steel, glass and<br />
cement.<br />
Create conditions for a less cyclically volatile industry by emphasising numerous,<br />
smaller scale, regionally dispersed projects to address backlogs, which are more<br />
accessible to smaller firms and new entrants.
65<br />
Expand public funding for alternative types of low-income housing that would<br />
generate more demand directly and in supplier industries.<br />
Promote a simultaneous focus on more energy-efficient buildings and building<br />
techniques to reduce demands on electricity supply in the longer term. Home<br />
insulation and the installation of solar water heaters are labour-intensive activities<br />
that have strong backward linkages to supplier industries.<br />
Tourism and Culture<br />
· Emphasis will be placed on increasing the total number of tourists entering the<br />
country, and the average amount of money spent by each tourist.<br />
· Ease of doing business, as well as availability of appropriate levels of tourism<br />
infrastructure (particularly transport, tourism offerings/ products and accommodation),<br />
will play an important role in attracting different types of tourists.<br />
· Foreign business tourists arriving by air generate the most significant multipliers.<br />
South Africa will be positioned as the business and shopping centre for the region.<br />
· South Africa can do more to develop the region as an international tourist destination<br />
by emphasising the broader biodiversity, cultural diversity, scenic beauty and range<br />
of tourism products, and making it easier for tourists to travel between countries in<br />
the region. A Schengen-type visa for the region will be considered.<br />
Overarching Principles for Spatial Development<br />
“All spatial development should conform to the following normative principles and should<br />
explicitly indicate how they would meet the requirements of these principles (National<br />
Planning Commission; The Presidency, RSA, 2012: 277):<br />
- Spatial justice. The historic policy of confining particular groups to limited space, as<br />
in ghettoization and segregation, and the unfair allocation of public resources<br />
between areas, must be reversed to ensure that the needs of the poor are addressed<br />
first rather than last.<br />
- Spatial sustainability. Sustainable patterns of consumption and production should<br />
be supported, and ways of living promoted that do not damage the natural<br />
environment.<br />
- Spatial resilience. Vulnerability to environmental degradation, resource scarcity and<br />
climatic shocks must be reduced. Ecological systems should be protected and<br />
replenished.<br />
- Spatial quality. The aesthetic and functional features of housing and the built<br />
environment need to be improved to create liveable, vibrant and valued places that<br />
allow for access and inclusion of people with disabilities.
66<br />
- Spatial efficiency. Productive activity and jobs should be supported, and burdens on<br />
business minimised. Efficient commuting patterns and circulation of goods and<br />
services should be encouraged, with regulatory procedures that do not impose<br />
unnecessary costs on development.<br />
1.6. ALIGNMENT WITH NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN<br />
Purpose of National Infrastructure Plan<br />
The South African Government adopted a National Infrastructure Plan in 2012 whose<br />
purpose is to transform economic landscape while simultaneously creating significant<br />
numbers of new jobs, and to strengthen the delivery of basic services. The plan also<br />
supports the integration of African economies.<br />
The National Infrastructure Plan contains 18 strategic Infrastructure Plans, out of which<br />
those with relevance to local government are summarised below:<br />
SIP 18: Water and sanitation infrastructure<br />
· A 10-year plan to address the estimated backlog of adequate water to supply 1.4 m<br />
households and 2.1 m households to basic sanitation. The project will involve<br />
provision of sustainable supply of water to meet social needs and support economic<br />
growth.<br />
· Projects will provide for new infrastructure, rehabilitation and upgrading of existing<br />
infrastructure, as well as improve management of water infrastructure.<br />
SIP 11: Agri-logistics and rural infrastructure<br />
Improve investment in agricultural and rural infrastructure that supports expansion of<br />
production and employment, small-scale farming and rural development, including:<br />
· facilities for storage (silos, fresh-produce facilities, packing houses)<br />
· transport links to main networks (rural roads, branch train-line, ports)<br />
· fencing of farms<br />
· irrigation schemes to poor areas<br />
· improved R&D on rural issues (including expansion of agricultural colleges)<br />
· processing facilities (abattoirs, dairy infrastructure)<br />
· aquaculture incubation schemes<br />
· rural tourism infrastructure.
67<br />
SIP 6: Integrated municipal infrastructure project<br />
· Develop national capacity to assist the <strong>23</strong> least resourced districts (19 million people)<br />
to address all the maintenance backlogs and upgrades required in water, electricity<br />
and sanitation bulk infrastructure.<br />
· The road maintenance programme will enhance service delivery capacity thereby<br />
impacting positively on the population.<br />
SIP 10: Electricity transmission and distribution for all<br />
· Expand the transmission and distribution network to address historical imbalances,<br />
provide access to electricity for all and support economic development.<br />
· Align the 10-year transmission plan, the services backlog, the national broadband<br />
roll-out and the freight rail line development to leverage off regulatory approvals,<br />
supply chain and project development capacity.<br />
SIP 1: Unlocking the northern mineral belt with Waterberg as the catalyst<br />
· Unlock mineral resources.<br />
· Rail, water pipelines, energy generation and transmission infrastructure.<br />
· Thousands of direct jobs across the areas unlocked.<br />
· Urban development in Waterberg - first major post-apartheid new urban centre will be<br />
a “green” development project.<br />
· Rail capacity to Mpumalanga and Richards Bay.<br />
· Shift from road to rail in Mpumalanga.<br />
· Logistics corridor to connect Mpumalanga and Gauteng.<br />
Primary Mineral Reserves<br />
Coal<br />
Chromite<br />
Platinum<br />
Palladium<br />
18 bn tons<br />
5,5 tons<br />
6 3<strong>23</strong> tons<br />
3 611 tons
68<br />
1.7. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF THE DISTRICT<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is an area with a long and proud history. It is also a place of majestic beauty<br />
with legal mountains, lush valleys and meandering rivers. Under its soil, lie vast deposits of<br />
precious metals – so vast that they today contain the largest reserves of platinum group<br />
metals in the world. Above its soil, sprout more than 2200 indigenous species of vascular<br />
plants, making it an area of exceptionally high biodiversity that is globally recognized. It is a<br />
land blessed by natural beauty, unusual resource endowments and a compelling history<br />
dating back to the 16 th century.<br />
The people of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> still remember the heritage bequeathed to them by their<br />
forefathers – by the legendary Chief <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 1 st who is still commemorated by South<br />
African leaders today, by the compassionate Pretoria Bishop, Michael Furse, who<br />
championed the cause of mineworkers in the early 1900s, by the hundreds of migrant<br />
workers who belonged to the celebrated Fetakgomo movement in the 1950s and by more<br />
recent heroes like Elias Motsoaledi. It is a legacy of resilience against all odds, and a<br />
commitment to uplifting the lives of the ordinary people of the region.<br />
Modern-day <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is found in Limpopo province, the Northern-most part of South<br />
Africa. The district which lies in the South-Eastern part of the province covers an area of<br />
approximately 13 264 square kilometers, most of which is rural with almost 740 villages<br />
(according to ward committees), which are generally sparsely populated and dispersed<br />
throughout the <strong>District</strong>. It is estimated that only 5% of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> population live in<br />
urban areas.<br />
Figure 4 - Geographic Location Map
69<br />
Figure 5: Land size per Local <strong>Municipality</strong> in %
70<br />
The main urban centres are Groblersdal, Marble Hall, Burgersfort, Jane Furse, Ohrigstad,<br />
Steelpoort and Driekop. The area’s towns and villages are serviced by its major rivers – the<br />
Olifants.<br />
HISTORY BEHIND THE NAMES<br />
Elias Motsoaledi: A legendary hero who was born in Nebo and was later sentenced to life imprisonment<br />
as part of the Rivonia treason trial. He spent 26 years in Robben Island until his release in 1989.<br />
Fetakgomo: The Sebatakgomo organization was first founded by migrant workers in the 1950s. It later<br />
resurfaced as Fetakgomo, a Pedi idiom which appeals for unity.<br />
Makhuduthamaga: Literally meaning “the executive”, this was a term used to denote members of the<br />
Fetakgomo movement in the 1950s.<br />
Ephraim Mogale: A Cadre who was born in Bingley, near Settlers on the 6 th February 1955. He was later<br />
sentenced to eight (8) years in Roben Island, of which he served five (5). He was released in 1985.<br />
Tubatse: Named after the famous Tubatse (Steelpoort) River. The capital of the early Pedi Empire,<br />
Manganeng, was found on the banks of this river in the early 1800s.<br />
The area is governed by the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM), a Category C<br />
municipality established in December 2000. Until early 2006, the <strong>District</strong> was a cross-border<br />
municipality, straddling the Limpopo and Mpumalanga provinces. In 2005, following a<br />
Constitutional amendment prohibiting cross-border municipalities, the <strong>District</strong> was wholly<br />
incorporated into Limpopo Province.
71<br />
The <strong>District</strong> is made up of 5 local municipalities (LMs) – Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
(formerly the Groblersdal Local <strong>Municipality</strong>), Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong>, Ephraim<br />
Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong>, Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> and Makhuduthamaga Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong>. Ephraim Mogale <strong>Municipality</strong> is predictably found within the Marble Hall area,<br />
whilst the others are centred on major conurbations like Groblersdal (Elias Motsoaledi), Apel<br />
(Fetakgomo), Burgersfort (Tubatse) and Jane Furse (Makhuduthamaga).<br />
Figure 6- Map of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> Municipal area<br />
The district consists of 121 wards which are broken down per local municipality as follows:<br />
Table 2: Number of wards per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong> Number of Wards Number of Villages<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 30 151<br />
Fetakgomo 13 98<br />
Ephraim Mogale 16 69<br />
Greater Tubatse 31 <strong>23</strong>3<br />
Makhuduthamaga 31 189<br />
TOTAL 121 740
Figure 7 – SDM Wards<br />
72
73<br />
CHAPTER 2:<br />
GOVERNANCE<br />
AND<br />
INSTITUTIONAL<br />
FRAMEWORK
74<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
In December 2009, the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> approved its new governance and<br />
institutional model. The governance model comprises of the Legislature and the Executive.<br />
The Legislature is made up of the Speaker of Council, the Council’s Chief Whip and Section<br />
79 Portfolio Committees, Standing Committees, Section 80 Committees and the Executive.<br />
The Executive consists of the Executive Mayor and Section 79 Portfolio, Section 80<br />
Committees and the Executive Mayor and Members of the Mayoral Committee (MMCs), as<br />
well as the administration, led by the Municipal Manager.<br />
The <strong>District</strong>’s governance model is underpinned by the following key principles:<br />
• Delineation of powers to separate legislative and oversight roles and executive roles<br />
and responsibilities;<br />
• Governance and institutional arrangements should deepen democracy, facilitate<br />
citizen empowerment and enhance stakeholder participation and involvement;<br />
• Decision-making powers and accountability should be strengthened, clearly defined,<br />
allocated and decentralized, where appropriate<br />
• Expeditious and efficient decision-making should ensure the facilitation of effective<br />
governance; and<br />
• Institutional structures of the <strong>District</strong> to be considered as part of a single group,<br />
based on a politically-led strategic and policy perspectives.<br />
The separation of legislative and executive roles delegates executive functions to the<br />
Executive Mayor and defines the roles of the legislature as that of oversight of the Executive.<br />
This function is performed by Council (in plenary), the Municipal Public Accounts Committee<br />
and the Section 79 Portfolio Committees, under the chairpersonship of non-executive<br />
councilors. These committees monitor and scrutinise the delivery and outputs of the<br />
Executive and may request the MMCs or Heads of Department (HoDs) to account for<br />
service delivery and performance.<br />
The Council, when meeting in plenary, provides an important platform for meaningful debate<br />
on issues that affect and require the attention of the <strong>District</strong>. It has three essential but<br />
interrelated roles and issues of legislation, oversight and to ensure community and<br />
stakeholder participation.<br />
2.1. LEGISLATURE<br />
The Council’s legislative functions include the approval of the by-laws, policies, the<br />
Integrated Development Plan (<strong>IDP</strong>), tariff for rates and service charges and the budget. The<br />
Council’s role in this respect is to consider reports from the Executive Mayor on each of<br />
these functions, to consider public discussions and comment, stimulates debate in multiparty<br />
portfolio committees and to provide the public platform for <strong>District</strong>-wide interaction. On the<br />
basis of the comments, the Council is in the position to approve or amend reports or to refer<br />
the reports back to the Executive Mayor.
75<br />
Council seeks to ensure community and stakeholder participation. The Council, led by the<br />
Office of the Speaker, has to facilitate community and stakeholder consultation and<br />
participation. Individual ward councillors, in conjunction with elected ward committees, play a<br />
critical role in facilitating these participatory processes.<br />
2.2. CHIEF WHIP<br />
The Council’s Chief Whip plays a pivotal role in the overall system of governance to ensure<br />
and sustain cohesiveness within the governing party and maintain relationships with other<br />
political parties. The main functions of the Chief Whip are to:<br />
• Ensure proper representation of political parties in the various committees;<br />
• Maintain sound relations with the various political parties represented in the Council; and<br />
• Attend to disputes between political parties and build consensus.<br />
2.3. SECTION 80 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEES<br />
These committees perform an oversight role by monitoring the delivery and outputs of the<br />
Executive. They are entitled to request departments and MMCs to account for their<br />
functions. In line with this responsibility, these committees may summon departments to<br />
appear before the committee and present any required documentation and information. The<br />
Portfolio Committees do not have any delegated decision-making powers.<br />
The specific functions of Portfolio Committees include:<br />
· <strong>Review</strong>ing, monitoring and evaluating departmental policies;<br />
· <strong>Review</strong>ing plans and budgets;<br />
· Considering quarterly and annual departmental reports;<br />
· Examining the link between the policy (sector plans) and budget (business plans);<br />
· Monitoring the implementation of plans;<br />
· Exploring options to increase value for money, and<br />
· Holding the political executive accountable for performance against policies and<br />
<strong>District</strong> priorities.<br />
Following are the five Portfolio Committees:<br />
• Budget and Treasury (BTC): Councillor Sihlangu T.L (Chairperson)<br />
• Community Services: Councillor Thamaga M.M (Chairperson)<br />
• Corporate Services: Councillor Mafefe O.H (Chairperson)<br />
• Infrastructure and Water Services: Councillor Ratau M.F (Chairperson)<br />
• Planning and Economic Development: Councillor Maitula B.M (Chairperson)
76<br />
2.4. SECTION 79 STANDING COMMITTEES<br />
The Standing Committees are permanent committees, established to deal with Councilrelated<br />
matters. They have some delegated decision-making powers and are required to<br />
submit reports to Council. Councillors chair all Standing Committees, except the Audit<br />
Committee, which is chaired by an independent person in line with the prescriptions of the<br />
Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA).<br />
The following standing committees have been put in place:<br />
• Municipal Public Accounts Committee: Cllr Lekola M.F (Chairperson)<br />
• Petitions, Rules and Ethics Committee: Cllr Mathebe N.C (Chairperson)<br />
• Chairpersons Committee:<br />
• Programming Committee: Cllr Mathebe N.C (Chairperson)<br />
• Audit Committee<br />
2.5. THE EXECUTIVE<br />
The Executive Mayor, assisted by the Mayoral Committee, heads the executive arm of the<br />
<strong>District</strong>. The Executive Mayor is at the centre of the system of governance and the executive<br />
powers are vested in him by the Council to manage the daily affairs of the <strong>District</strong>. This<br />
means that he has the overarching strategic and political responsibility. The following are the<br />
portfolios allocated to Members of Mayoral Committee:<br />
• MMC: Planning and Economic Development: Matlala RM<br />
• MMC: Corporate Service: Nchabeleng TL<br />
• MMC: Infrastructure and Water Services: Mahlo SA<br />
• MMC: Budget and Treasury: Seloane LM<br />
• MMC: Community Services: Mokoka K.S.D.<br />
• MMC: in Office of the Executive Mayor – Traditional Affairs: Kgoloko N.L<br />
• MMC: in Office of the Executive Mayor - Gender Leadership: Mamahlako P.M<br />
• MMC: Infrastructure and Water Services: Lokola M.F<br />
2.6. THE LEADER OF EXECUTIVE BUSINESS<br />
The Leader of Executive Business provides the interface between the executive and<br />
legislative branches. The roles and responsibilities of the Leader of Executive Business are<br />
to:<br />
· Represent the executive branch in terms of Council matters and serve as the link<br />
between the executive branch and the legislative branch;<br />
· Ensure that executive business is effectively delegated to Council, via the<br />
Programming Committee;
77<br />
· Consult with the Speaker when the Speaker intends calling a special meeting of<br />
Council, outside of the scheduled Council meetings;<br />
· Consult with the Speaker for purposes of allocating time for the discussion of matters<br />
of public importance on the Council agenda, and<br />
· Determine which matters are referred to the Speaker and thereafter to Section 79<br />
Committees and Council.<br />
2.7. ADMINISTRATION<br />
The Municipal Manager is also the accounting officer, as defined by the Municipal Structures<br />
Act. The responsibilities of the Municipal Manager include managing the financial affairs and<br />
service delivery in the municipality. He is assisted by the Management Team composed of<br />
the following departments:<br />
• Municipal Manager’s Office composed of the Chief Operations Officer with the<br />
Internal Audit Unit, Risk Management Unit, Strategic Planning and Policy Coordination<br />
Unit<br />
• Corporate Services<br />
• Budget and Treasury<br />
• Planning and Economic Development<br />
• Infrastructure and Water Services<br />
• Community Services<br />
2.8. MUNICIPAL OWNED ENTITY<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has established the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Development Agency<br />
(SDA) as its own Municipal Owned Entity to drive high impact economic development<br />
programmes. The entity is headed by the Chief Executive Officer with a Board of Directors in<br />
place to provide management oversight.<br />
2.9. HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
The <strong>District</strong> is committed to an efficient human resources system and has reviewed a<br />
number of policies to ensure the effective development of staff.
78<br />
CHAPTER 3:<br />
ANALYSIS PHASE
79<br />
3.1 DEMOGRAPHICS IN SDM<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT VILLAGES<br />
Figure 8: Number of villages in the district<br />
32%<br />
13%<br />
9%<br />
Fetakgomo<br />
Ephraim M<br />
20%<br />
Elias M<br />
26%<br />
Makhuduthamaga<br />
Greater Tubatse<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
There are 740 villages in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. 32% (<strong>23</strong>3) of the villages are<br />
found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 26% (189) in Makhuduthamaga Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong>; 20% (151) in Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 13% (98) in Fetakgomo Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> and finally 9 %( 69) are found in Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. Greater<br />
Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest number of villages and Ephraim Mogale being<br />
the lowest.<br />
There are 121 wards in the district as follows: Makhuduthamaga (31); Greater Tubatse (31);<br />
Elias Motsoaledi (30); Ephraim Mogale (16) and Fetakgomo (13).<br />
The only issue which remains a concern regarding villages is names of these villages. There<br />
is a need to rationalise the naming and renaming of villages as they change every day. The<br />
<strong>District</strong> Geographic Names Council must prioritise this matter.<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT HOUSEHOLDS<br />
Table 3: Households in the district<br />
MUNICIPALITIE<br />
S<br />
Population Number of households Average<br />
household size<br />
1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011
80<br />
Ephraim Mogale 97 597 115 682 1<strong>23</strong> 648 19 666 24 189 32 284 5,0 4,8 3,8<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 218 622 213 218 249 363 42 641 45 478 60 251 5,1 4,7 4,1<br />
Makhuduthamaga 266 845 258 246 274 358 49 798 52 978 65 217 5,4 4,9 4,2<br />
Fetakgomo 96 945 91 589 93 795 17 376 18 883 22 851 5,6 4,9 4,1<br />
Greater Tubatse 227 127 264 258 335 676 42 427 53 756 83 199 5,4 4,9 4,0<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 907 137 942 993 1 076 840 171 908 195 285 263 802 5,3 4,8 4,1<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
Since 1996, the number of households in the district has been on an upward trend. In 2011,<br />
there are 263 802 households in the district. The average household size is 4.1 in 2011 and<br />
was 5,3 in 1996. This means that the extended family set up is beginning to change on a<br />
daily basis with modern life styles. The provincial household average size is 3.8 which mean<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> household average size is still relatively high by comparison.<br />
Household size<br />
The households’ size in the rural areas differs with the households’ sizes in the urban areas.<br />
The households’ size in the rural areas is 4.76% while in the urban areas is 4.22%.<br />
HOUSING TYPE MAIN DWELLING<br />
In 2011, <strong>23</strong>4 095 households are living in formal dwellings. There is also 10 107 households<br />
who still reside in traditional dwellings such as mud houses. Informal dwellings are also<br />
found in the district which stand at 17 861 in 2011. There is a need to formalise the informal<br />
dwellings (shacks) especially those found around main towns in the district.<br />
Table 4: Main Dwellings<br />
MUNICIPALITIES Formal dwellings Traditional dwellings Informal dwellings<br />
1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />
Ephraim Mogale 13 355 19 097 30 102 4 899 3 827 773 1 108 1 196 1 <strong>23</strong>2<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 30 803 36 137 54 503 8 705 6 902 2 274 1 995 2 356 3 <strong>14</strong>1<br />
Makhuduthamaga 33 407 41 712 58 744 13 354 8 804 2 819 2 337 2 403 3 398<br />
Fetakgomo 10 987 15 258 21 535 5 566 2 713 451 521 762 685<br />
Greater Tubatse 25 079 38 890 69 212 13 600 9 874 3 790 3 115 4 802 9 406<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 113<br />
632<br />
151<br />
094<br />
<strong>23</strong>4<br />
095<br />
46 124 32 121 10 107 9 075 11 520 17 861<br />
Source Census (2011)
81<br />
HOUSEHOLD TENURE STATUS<br />
The rental housing market is growing rapidly in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. 28 825<br />
households were recorded to be living in rented houses in the district. Not surprisingly, the<br />
majority of these households are found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> especially with<br />
migrants into the mining industry. Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi also recorded<br />
markedly improved numbers for rental stock.<br />
Table 5: Household tenure status<br />
MUNICIPALITIES Owned and fully paid<br />
off<br />
Owned but not yet fully<br />
paid off<br />
Rented<br />
2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011<br />
Ephraim Mogale <strong>14</strong> <strong>23</strong>1 995 1 120 13 553 604 4 288<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 24 627 1 440 3 153 33 324 1 658 5 828<br />
Makhuduthamaga 30 979 2 191 1 441 44 302 2 257 3 035<br />
Fetakgomo 11 757 1 026 1 066 12 073 913 1 979<br />
Greater Tubatse 30 281 3 663 2 <strong>14</strong>0 41 108 3 768 13 697<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 111 877 9 315 8 921 <strong>14</strong>4 360 9 201 28 827<br />
Source Census (2011)<br />
HOUSEHOLD OWNERSHIP, RADIO, TELEVISION, COMPUTER, REFRIGERATOR, LANDLINE,<br />
CELL PHONE, INTERNET<br />
Table 6: Household ownership, Radio, Television, Computer, Refrigerator, Landline, Cell<br />
phone, Internet<br />
MUNICIPALI<br />
TY<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Makhuduth<br />
amaga<br />
RADIO TELEVISION COMPUTE<br />
R<br />
2001 2011 200<br />
1<br />
1602<br />
1<br />
3304<br />
3<br />
3469<br />
5<br />
Fetakgomo 1242<br />
8<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
3602<br />
7<br />
1718<br />
7<br />
3884<br />
9<br />
3952<br />
3<br />
<strong>14</strong>47<br />
1<br />
4760<br />
3<br />
1<strong>14</strong><br />
87<br />
241<br />
71<br />
184<br />
72<br />
442<br />
9<br />
154<br />
25<br />
2011 20<br />
01<br />
2188<br />
8<br />
4410<br />
8<br />
4676<br />
5<br />
1737<br />
2<br />
4947<br />
4<br />
46<br />
3<br />
66<br />
0<br />
30<br />
8<br />
13<br />
8<br />
58<br />
1<br />
201<br />
1<br />
254<br />
5<br />
609<br />
3<br />
437<br />
1<br />
161<br />
9<br />
784<br />
5<br />
REFRIGIRAT<br />
OR<br />
200<br />
1<br />
109<br />
43<br />
246<br />
77<br />
160<br />
82<br />
463<br />
1<br />
179<br />
54<br />
2011 200<br />
1<br />
2104<br />
5<br />
4326<br />
3<br />
4484<br />
9<br />
1644<br />
1<br />
5090<br />
2<br />
LANDLINE CELLPHONE INTER<br />
NET<br />
215<br />
3<br />
417<br />
8<br />
204<br />
3<br />
20<br />
11<br />
78<br />
5<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
98<br />
10<br />
34<br />
453 39<br />
3<br />
268<br />
5<br />
16<br />
67<br />
200<br />
1<br />
522<br />
2<br />
119<br />
44<br />
918<br />
0<br />
262<br />
7<br />
964<br />
1<br />
2011 2011<br />
2674<br />
2<br />
5303<br />
5<br />
5469<br />
2<br />
1897<br />
3<br />
7399<br />
7<br />
5079<br />
13308<br />
12024<br />
3676<br />
16567<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 1322 1576 739 1786 21 224 742 1764 115 53 386 2274 50653
82<br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>14</strong> 31 75 07 50 73 88 99 11 77 13 39<br />
Source: Census 2011<br />
The number of households who have radio ownership have increased from 132 2<strong>14</strong> in 2001<br />
to 157 631 in 2011. Television ownership have improved from 73 975 in 2001 to 178 607 in<br />
2011 which is more than double. Refrigerator ownership have also improved from 74 288 in<br />
2001 to 176 499 in 2011. Cell phone ownership have also shot up from 38 613 in 2001 t<br />
227 439 in 2011. The trends tell a story that access to communication in the district has<br />
improved. The rise in average household incomes has also implied that there was<br />
disposable income to buy other products such as television, fridges and cell phones.<br />
The implication is that there is a chance for the district to start offering better services to the<br />
residents and opportunities for cost recovery are abound. Unemployment has shifted from<br />
61.6% in 1996 to 50.9% in 2011 and therefore there is real change in economic dynamics.<br />
POPULATION<br />
The population of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has been growing at an average of 1, 1%<br />
per annum from 1996 to 2011. According to Statistics South Africa (SSA) 2011 census, the<br />
population of the district is now standing at 1, 076 840 persons. This compares to population<br />
growth numbers in 2001 at 967 185 as well as 1996 which stood at 9<strong>14</strong> 492. On the whole,<br />
the population growth numbers in the district have been growing moderately and this can be<br />
ascribed to a number of factors as will be indicated when comparing data from the local<br />
municipalities in the district.<br />
Figure 9 – Population growth rate<br />
Population growth rates in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
1996-2011<br />
Population growth rates in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 1996-2011<br />
1076840<br />
9<strong>14</strong>492<br />
967185<br />
Year 1996 Year 2001 Year 2011<br />
Source: CENSUS (2011)
83<br />
If one compares the growth rate in the district with a neighbouring <strong>District</strong> (Waterberg) there<br />
are stark realities. Waterberg have similar features in terms of drivers for economic<br />
development around mining developments. In 2001, Waterberg growth rate was at 2, 6%<br />
(604 938 persons) and 1, 2% in 2011 (679 336 persons). It will be interesting for<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> to start comparing itself and working together with Waterberg simply<br />
because they are both in Limpopo and are exposed to almost similar economic conditions.<br />
Population growth numbers in local municipalities<br />
As indicated in the figure below, <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> comprises five local<br />
municipalities namely; Greater Tubatse, Makhuduthamaga, Ephraim Mogale, Elias<br />
Motsoaledi and Fetakgomo. Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has experienced<br />
tremendous population growth from 1996 to 2011 and the growth curve has always been<br />
upward at 3.2% in 2001 and 2.2% in 2011 whereas the average growth rate in the district<br />
has been 1.1%. Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> have always stayed behind with very slow<br />
growth rate at -1, 0% in 2001 and 0.1% in 2011.<br />
The factors that have been driving growth in population numbers in the district can be<br />
summarised as follows:<br />
• In-migration into Tubatse local municipality for job opportunities especially in the<br />
mining sector and associated industries<br />
• There are also migrants from other provinces who have come into the district to look<br />
for work.<br />
The national scenario indicates that Gauteng Province and Western Cape have continued to<br />
attract more people from other provinces and <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is not<br />
immune from such national trends in out-migration.<br />
Figure 10: Population trends per LM<br />
400000<br />
350000<br />
300000<br />
250000<br />
200000<br />
150000<br />
100000<br />
50000<br />
0<br />
Population growth trends per<br />
local municipality year 1996<br />
Population growth trends per<br />
local municipality year 2001<br />
Population growth trends per<br />
local municipality year 2011
84<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
Table 7: The recorded population figures per local municipality are as follows:<br />
MUNICIPALITY 1996 2001 2011 % growth<br />
rate 2001<br />
% growth rate<br />
2011<br />
Greater Tubatse 229 583 269 608 335 676 3,2% 2,2%<br />
Makhuduthamaga 269 313 262 005 274 358 -0,6% 0,5%<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 220 394 221 647 249 363 0,1% 1,2%<br />
Ephraim Mogale 97 988 121 327 1<strong>23</strong> 648 4,3% 0,2%<br />
Fetakgomo 97 213 92 598 93 795 -1,0% 0,1%<br />
Total:<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
9<strong>14</strong> 492 967 185 1,076 840 1,1% 1,1%<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
Implications of population growth trends for the district<br />
The population growth trends suggest that there are more persons coming into Greater<br />
Tubatse and Elias Motsoaledi Local Municipalities. There is also a moderate increase in<br />
population numbers into Makhuduthamaga local municipality. With regard to allocation of<br />
resources and services, the district municipality should ensure that the three municipalities<br />
receive much attention in terms myriad of services such as water and sanitation services but<br />
also for services that are rendered by other spheres of government. These municipalities<br />
where there are high growth numbers need to plan adequately for services provision so that<br />
there is no collapse on the current level of service in the communities. Fetakgomo and<br />
Ephraim Mogale also need to be assisted so that the growth numbers increase in the next<br />
10 years at least to 1% per annum.<br />
Gender Profile<br />
Figure11: Gender Profile: Males and Females<br />
700000<br />
600000<br />
500000<br />
400000<br />
300000<br />
200000<br />
100000<br />
0<br />
YEAR 1996 YEAR 2001 YEAR 2011<br />
MALES<br />
FEMALES<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
Since 1996, sex ratios have not changed much. In 2011, there are 497 428 males compared<br />
to 579 191 females. The imbalance can be attributed to large numbers of males who migrate<br />
to other provinces to look for work opportunities. As a result of the rural nature of the district
85<br />
of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, there are still persons who work in other provinces such as Gauteng and<br />
only come back home monthly or bi-monthly to see their families. This scenario also tells a<br />
picture that there might high presence of female headed households in the district.<br />
The implication for the district is that there is a need to develop programmes that target<br />
women in particular to create self-employment and educational opportunities where possible.<br />
Table 8: Gender profile: Males and Females<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> Males Females<br />
1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />
Ephraim Mogale 45 117 55 765 58 207 52 871 65 561 65 442<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 100 000 99 104 115 503 120 394 122 543 133 860<br />
Makhuduthamaga 118 421 113 6<strong>14</strong> 121 282 150 892 <strong>14</strong>8 392 153 075<br />
Fetakgomo 43 187 40 902 42 258 54 026 51 696 51 536<br />
Greater Tubatse 103 955 121 043 160 125 125 628 <strong>14</strong>8 565 175 278<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 410 681 430 428 497 428 503 811 536 757 579 191<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
POPULATION GROUP BY RACE<br />
The figure below indicates that 99% of the population in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is<br />
made up of Africans. The remainder 1% comprises Whites, Indians and Coloureds. It is not a<br />
surprising trend because a large part of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> comprises villages<br />
under tribal authorities. The 1% of the Whites, Indians and Coloureds are confined to the<br />
main towns in the district and mining areas.<br />
Figure 12: Population by race<br />
Population by race<br />
1200000<br />
1000000<br />
800000<br />
600000<br />
400000<br />
200000<br />
0<br />
Africans Coloured Indian/Asian Whites<br />
Population by race<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
Table 9: Population growth by race<br />
RACE 1996 2001 2011<br />
Africans 898 129 958 594 1 061 550<br />
Coloured 579 727 1 <strong>23</strong>2<br />
Indian/Asian 377 508 1 721<br />
Whites 8 876 7 356 11 015
86<br />
Source Census (2011)<br />
Home language<br />
The dominant home language in SDM is Sepedi with 83, 34% followed by IsiNdebele in<br />
4.4%. According to statistics, the areas that are predominantly Pedi speaking are<br />
Makhuduthamaga and Greater Tubatse. Comparing English and Afrikaans speakers, there<br />
are few English speakers in 0.22% while the Afrikaans speakers in 0.83%. Most Afrikaans<br />
speakers are in our former white only towns of Groblersdal, Marble Hall and Burgersfort.<br />
AGE STRUCTURE IN THE DISTRICT<br />
Figure 13: Age structure<br />
700000<br />
600000<br />
500000<br />
400000<br />
300000<br />
200000<br />
100000<br />
0<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
Age structure 1996-<br />
2001 (Statssa,2011)<br />
0-4 years<br />
15-64 years<br />
65+ years<br />
The age structure in the district indicates that from 1996 to 2011, the working age group from<br />
15-64 years has been on an upward trend. These are persons of school going age and<br />
those that are either in employment or seeking for employment. The age group 0-4 years<br />
has been relatively stable over time from 1996 to 2011. The very older age group 65+<br />
(pension age) has also been stable over time.<br />
The implications for this picture are that the district municipality in collaboration with other<br />
stakeholders must work on developing programmes that address matters of education and<br />
employment creation. The district does not have higher education institutions except for the<br />
former educational colleges that are mainly used for Further Education and Training (FET’s).<br />
With a population of over a million people, the district must consider working with education<br />
authorities to explore possibility of establishing an arm/satellite of University of Technology<br />
or University in the district.<br />
AGE AND GENDER
87<br />
Within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, the below – 18 age group makes up almost 50% of the population.<br />
Behind this average, lie slight variations in the different municipalities. This ranges from 51%<br />
in Makhuduthamaga (comparatively the youngest population) to 48% in Ephraim Mogale<br />
(comparatively the oldest population).<br />
Table 10: Age and gender profile<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> Age group Male Female Total<br />
Fetakgomo 0-17 22,916 <strong>23</strong>,060 45,996<br />
18-64 15,816 <strong>23</strong>,996 39,812<br />
65+ 1,951 4,322 6,273<br />
Total 40,684 51,398 92,081<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 0-17 53,444 54,172 107,616<br />
18-64 40,684 51,398 92,081<br />
65+ 4,422 9,085 13,506<br />
Total 98,729 122,009 220,738<br />
Makhuduthamaga 0-17 66,600 67,468 134,068<br />
18-64 41,816 69,246 111,062<br />
65+ 5,601 12,179 17,779<br />
Total 1<strong>14</strong>,017 <strong>14</strong>8,892 262,909<br />
Ephraim Mogale 0-17 28,894 28,777 57,670<br />
18-64 24,353 32,061 56,4<strong>14</strong><br />
65+ 2,534 4,701 7,<strong>23</strong>6<br />
Total 55,780 65,539 121,320<br />
Tubatse 0-17 67,895 68,990 136,885<br />
18-64 49,252 70,351 119,603<br />
65+ 4,182 9,446 13,627<br />
Total 121,329 <strong>14</strong>8,787 270,116<br />
Total 0-17 <strong>23</strong>9,750 242,486 482,<strong>23</strong>6<br />
18-64 172,101 254,406 426,507<br />
65+ 18,689 39,733 58,422<br />
Total 430,540 536,625 967,165<br />
Stats SA Community Survey 2007<br />
The male-female ratios are almost equal in the age group below 18 years, but females are<br />
almost 60% of the population in the working age group and more than 68% in the senior age<br />
group for the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> district as a whole. It is obvious then that a significant number of<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> males have alternative residence away from the district – a fact already alluded<br />
to earlier in this chapter. The ratio is as high as 62% in Makhuduthamaga and 57% in<br />
Ephraim Mogale.<br />
MARITAL STATUS
88<br />
Figure <strong>14</strong>: Marital Status<br />
Marital status<br />
NUMBERS<br />
1000000<br />
800000<br />
600000<br />
400000<br />
200000<br />
0<br />
-200000<br />
yea 2001 202588 7161<strong>23</strong> 42821 5652<br />
Marital status<br />
year 1996 196686 675254 <strong>23</strong>173 4379<br />
Source: Census 2011<br />
married<br />
never<br />
married<br />
widowed<br />
divorced<br />
The figure shows that within the district municipality, a large chunk of the population is never<br />
married. The number of widows have also been increasing from <strong>23</strong> 173 in 1996 to 45 001 in<br />
2011. Divorce rates in the district have only stabilised from 1996 to 2011.<br />
Table 11: Marital Status<br />
STATUS 1996 2001 2011<br />
Married 196 686 202 588 246 449<br />
Never married 675 254 716 1<strong>23</strong> 779 408<br />
Widowed <strong>23</strong> 173 42 821 45 001<br />
Divorced/separated 4 379 5 652 5 982<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
EDUCATION PROFILE IN THE SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />
Figure 15: Education status<br />
250000<br />
200000<br />
150000<br />
100000<br />
50000<br />
0<br />
Education status<br />
Education status
89<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
The majority of persons within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> have some secondary<br />
school. It is also equally noticeable that 117 139 persons have no schooling in 2011. This is<br />
concerning because those who cannot read and write will not be able to access better job<br />
opportunities in the market as in most training programmes there is a need to have basic<br />
writing and reading skills. There are also very insignificant numbers of the persons that have<br />
higher education in the district.<br />
Table 12: Education status<br />
STATUS 1996 2001 2011<br />
No schooling 165 384 185 760 117 139<br />
Some Primary 39 986 52 840 63 546<br />
Completed primary 19 904 19 897 22 510<br />
Some secondary 91 228 107 671 204 571<br />
Grade 12 43 307 48 873 119 344<br />
Higher 11 665 20 482 32 757<br />
Source Census (2011)<br />
Table 13: Education profile per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Fetakg<br />
omo<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Grand Total<br />
SDM<br />
No Schooling 4.13 1.69 1.67 3.88 4.60 15.98<br />
Some Primary 5.56 2.74 3.31 8.70 6.12 26.43<br />
Education<br />
Grade 7 /Std. 5/ 1.25 0.65 0.68 1.83 1.27 5.68<br />
ABET 3<br />
Some Secondary 6.17 2.95 3.03 9.76 6.90 28.79<br />
Education<br />
Completed 1.46 0.53 0.67 1.56 0.87 5.09<br />
Secondary<br />
Education<br />
Certificate 0.33 0.11 0.22 0.57 0.22 1.45<br />
with/without<br />
GR.12<br />
Diploma<br />
0.24 0.27 0.19 0.41 0.35 1.47<br />
with/without<br />
GR.12<br />
Degree & Higher 0.21 0.08 0.12 0.19 0.18 0.77<br />
Unspecified 0.46 0.05 0.06 0.49 0.56 1.62
90<br />
Out of scope 2.88 1.22 1.47 4.11 3.02 12.71<br />
(children under 5<br />
years of age)<br />
Grant Total 22.70 10.29 11.42 31.50 24.09 100.00<br />
Source: Statistics South Africa Community Survey 2007<br />
As indicated in the tables above, the district has a relatively high illiteracy level, with almost<br />
28% of the population having no formal school education whatsoever. Only 1% of the<br />
population has obtained tertiary educational qualifications.<br />
The Limpopo Provincial Growth and Development Strategy indicate that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has<br />
the least of highly skilled individuals in the province. The low skills reduce the ability of the<br />
<strong>District</strong> to be innovative and economically productive.<br />
OUT-MIGRATION AND MALE ABSENTEEISM IN SEKHUKHUNE<br />
A striking characteristic of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> population is the high levels of male absenteeism<br />
in the <strong>District</strong>. This is the result of most males being forced to seek work outside<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. The table below is based on a sample survey in the area, and attempts to<br />
characterize the types of migrants that leave <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households to seek work in other<br />
parts of the country.<br />
Table <strong>14</strong>: Categories of migrants from <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households<br />
Category Number %<br />
Regular migrants (return every week or month) 70,257 56,8<br />
Seasonal migrants (for a limited period each year) 34,005 27,5<br />
Prolonged period away (more than 6 months at a time) 19,496 15,7<br />
Total number of absentee migrants 1<strong>23</strong>,759 100<br />
Economic migration clearly affects both current population figures and projected population<br />
growth in the <strong>District</strong>. As subsequent sections of this chapter will show, it also fundamentally<br />
affects economic planning in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. Current discussions on augmenting rail transport<br />
in the area, for example, are underpinned by analyses of the number and types of migrants<br />
who travel in and out of the area.<br />
What is undisputed is that the remittances sent back to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households by workers<br />
elsewhere contribute significantly to livelihoods in the district. The table below, also based on<br />
a sample survey, attempts to quantify the remittances received by households in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
Table 15: Remittances received by <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households in 2006<br />
Number of Brackets %<br />
Less than R500 12,9<br />
R500 – R1,000 <strong>23</strong>,7<br />
R1,001 – R3,000 12,7
91<br />
More than R3,00 50,7<br />
Total 100<br />
According to the NSDP, the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has the 4 th largest out-migration (people<br />
migrating out of the <strong>District</strong>) in the country with 6.69% of its total population opting to leave<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (The Presidency, 2006). The volume and nature of migration is clearly a factor<br />
that development planners in the <strong>District</strong> need to take into account in their medium-term<br />
planning.<br />
Disability<br />
95.88% do not have disability, which means that the majority of the population does not<br />
need any disability related care in both public and private buildings. 1.34% has physical<br />
disability followed by sight at 0.68%, emotional at 0.63%, deaf at 0.55 and multiple<br />
disabilities at 0.17%. The table below illustrates the types of disabilities found in the district:<br />
Table 16: Disability Types<br />
Disability<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Fetakgomo Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Grand<br />
Total<br />
Sight (blind/severe 3.10 2.21 1.62 5.04 6.39 18.36<br />
visual limitation)<br />
Hearing (Deaf) 2.01 1.39 1.42 2.33 1.83 8.98<br />
Communication 1.42 0.49 0.21 1.74 1.94 5.79<br />
(speech Impairment)<br />
Physical (need 9.69 2.26 4.54 7.83 11.60 35.91<br />
wheelchair)<br />
Intellectual (serious 1.01 1.<strong>14</strong> 1.73 2.<strong>23</strong> 3.<strong>14</strong> 9.24<br />
difficulty in learning)<br />
Emotional<br />
5.63 1.91 1.87 3.99 3.66 17.06<br />
(Behaviour)<br />
Multiple Disabilities 0.38 1.45 0.18 0.41 2.24 4.65<br />
Grand Total <strong>23</strong>.<strong>23</strong> 10.85 11.56 <strong>23</strong>.57 30.80 100.00<br />
Source: STATS SA, Community Survey 2007<br />
Disability Development Programmes<br />
The Office of the Executive Mayor supports disabled persons community through<br />
celebrations of important calendar days covering a variety of disabilities and workshops.<br />
· Support to <strong>District</strong> Disability Forum<br />
· Deaf Awareness Campaign<br />
· Eye Care Awareness Campaign<br />
· Albinism Awareness Campaign
92<br />
Challenges<br />
· Ineffective Disability Forums<br />
· Lack of clear Policies on advancement o disable people’s needs and aspirations<br />
· Insufficient budget to implement awareness programs<br />
· Public places not accessible and use friendly for disable people<br />
Income<br />
The figures below indicate that people in the SDM have different income gaps while a huge<br />
number of people do not receive any income from any source. This analysis shows that<br />
many people in the SDM live below poverty line.<br />
Table 17: Income Groups in the SDM<br />
No income 21842<br />
R1-R4 800 17969<br />
R4 801-R9 600 3<strong>14</strong>84<br />
R9 601-R19 200 50657<br />
R19 201-R38400 45039<br />
R38 401-R76 800 18555<br />
R76 801-R153 600 9895<br />
R153 601-R307 200 5681<br />
R307 201-R6<strong>14</strong> 400 745<br />
R6<strong>14</strong> 401-R1 228 800 183<br />
R1 228 801-R2 457 600 152<br />
R2 457 or more 156<br />
Response not given <strong>14</strong>8<strong>14</strong><br />
STATSSA, Community Survey, 2007<br />
Economically Active Population<br />
The SDM like any other <strong>District</strong> in South Africa is experiencing a decline in formal job<br />
opportunities because of the general global economic meltdown. This has led to an<br />
escalating unemployment particularly among the economically active population of 18 years<br />
and above. Unemployment rate has encouraged the fast growth of informal sector in the<br />
district. The table below provides a breakdown of the employment patterns within the<br />
<strong>District</strong>.<br />
Table 18: Economically Active population<br />
Description Ephraim Tubatse Fetakgomo Elias Makhutha <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Mogale<br />
Motsoaledi maga<br />
Employment 15056 45321 7<strong>23</strong>6 39098 21978 127688<br />
Unemployment 11098 51551 11566 16725 33346 124226
93<br />
Non<br />
40787 90696 39511 79066 77494 327553<br />
economically<br />
active<br />
N/A 20,031 110,467 43,390 42,472 126,622 354,626<br />
Unspecified 40<br />
Total 87,012 298,035 101,703 176,361 259,440 934,093<br />
Source: STATS SA Community Survey 2007<br />
Employment by Industry<br />
Conventional wisdom has it that agriculture; mining and tourism are three leading sectors in<br />
the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy. Official statistics, however, paint a slightly different picture of the<br />
district economy being dominated by community services, mining and trade. It must be noted<br />
that it is very difficult to find accurate data for the local level in South Africa. Those datagathering<br />
exercises that do exist often yield vastly different accounts of local realities. Most<br />
public sector plans and <strong>IDP</strong>s, however, draw on Stats SA data even whilst recognizing some<br />
of its limitations.<br />
Table 19: The Breakdown of employment by industry in the SDM is as follows:<br />
Sectors<br />
Makhuduth<br />
amaga<br />
Fetakgomo Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Grand<br />
Total<br />
Agriculture, Hunting, 0.<strong>23</strong> 0.01 0.29 0.54 0.31 1.38<br />
Forestry and fishing<br />
Mining and Quarrying 0.02 0.39 0.02 0.03 1.72 2.18<br />
Manufacturing 0.17 0.02 0.25 0.47 0.49 1.41<br />
Electricity, Gas and 0.03 - 0.04 0.07 0.02 0.16<br />
Water Supply<br />
Construction 0.31 0.05 0.16 0.33 0.32 1.17<br />
Wholesale and retail 0.52 0.10 0.26 0.96 0.83 2.66<br />
trade<br />
Transport, Storage 0.09 0.01 0.08 0.28 0.26 0.72<br />
and communication<br />
Financial, Insurance, 0.05 - 0.19 0.44 0.44 1.12<br />
real Estate and<br />
Community, Social 0.77 0.32 0.59 1.00 0.93 3.62<br />
and personal Services<br />
Other and no 0.<strong>14</strong> 0.03 0.36 0.41 0.39 1.32<br />
adequately defined<br />
Not applicable 19.40 8.64 8.75 16.69 24.63 78.11<br />
Unspecified 1.54 0.34 0.35 1.96 1.98 6.16<br />
Grand Total <strong>23</strong>.26 9.92 11.33 <strong>23</strong>.18 32.31 100.00<br />
Source: STATS SA: Community Survey 2007
94<br />
The Three main contributors to GGP were community services (3.62%), mining (2.38%) and<br />
trade (2, 66%). Despite these findings, the district has very consciously chosen to explore<br />
the potential of mining, agriculture and tourism as key contributors to the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
economy up to the year 2025. This is also in recognition of the fact that thriving local<br />
economics should not depend overly on public sector injections of income.<br />
Mode of Transport<br />
The main modes of transport in SDM were buses, taxis and trucks. There were 45.02% of<br />
the people travel on foot to go to work and some to schools. 1.45% of the people in the<br />
<strong>District</strong> prefer to travel by taxis while 1.39% of people prefer to travel by bus. All the five local<br />
municipalities in the district depended on taxis and buses which were subsidized and some<br />
were not subsidised.<br />
3.2 SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />
3.2.1. Introduction<br />
The Spatial Development Framework (SDF) is a core component of a the <strong>Municipality</strong>‘s<br />
economic, sectorial, spatial, social, institutional, environmental vision. In other words it is<br />
a tool to achieve the desired spatial form of the <strong>Municipality</strong>. The spatial analysis provide<br />
a picture of the spatial challenges such as land use, land claims, land unavailability, land<br />
invasions, degradation of the natural environment and opportunities of the municipality.<br />
In this document we have discussed the status qou of spatial development within the<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> district municipality which outlined the following characteristics and trends:<br />
· Spatial Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the <strong>District</strong><br />
· Spatial Concentrations of Population<br />
· Population Growth Areas / Points<br />
· Local Service Points<br />
· Economic Activity Concentration<br />
· Centers of Agricultural Production<br />
· Operational Mines in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
· Existing Land Use and Related Potential<br />
· Spatial Economic Development Opportunities<br />
3.2.2. Status Quo<br />
Spatial Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the <strong>District</strong>
95<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) developed its first Spatial Development<br />
Framework (SDF) in 2004 which was adopted by Council and it is reviewed annually.<br />
The SDF is aligned to both NSDP and LEGDP.<br />
Spatial Concentrations of Population<br />
The total population of the <strong>District</strong> is currently estimated at approximately 1 090,424<br />
(Census, 2011). The below map gives an account of the population spread per each Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
Figure 16- SDM Population Distribution Map<br />
It reveals geographical disparities and a dispersed settlement pattern with few dominant<br />
concentration points.
96<br />
The account of this spatial structure and settlement pattern is the result of the spatial policies<br />
promoted by the former apartheid dispensation. As a result, the space economy of SDM is<br />
characterized by a geographical split between former homeland areas, and areas which fell<br />
outside of the former homelands of Lebowa and KwaNdebele. Furthermore, the potential<br />
burgeoning of mining, agricultural, and tourism activities within the <strong>District</strong> presents spatial<br />
challenges of its own, amidst the inherited spatial challenges.<br />
Land which formed part of the former homeland areas of KwaNdebele and Lebowa is<br />
generally characterized by low-density residential areas spreading over vast areas of land,<br />
and mainly occurs in two clusters – the Moutse area to the south-west and the central area<br />
around Jane Furse. Characteristically, residential areas located within the western extents of<br />
the <strong>District</strong> are more densely populated / developed than those in the north due their<br />
proximity to Gauteng. Conversely, land which fell outside of the former homelands are<br />
generally characterized by private / commercial farms, and medium density settlements<br />
clustered around semi-urban centres featuring retail and service-related activities.<br />
More specifically, the SDM features approximately 605 sparsely populated and dispersed<br />
rural settlements, with Groblersdal, Marble Hall, Burgersfort, Jane Furse, Ohrigstad,<br />
Steelpoort and Driekop constituting the main/first order urban centres. The spatial location of<br />
these first order centres generally coincide with the <strong>District</strong>’s two dominant economic activity<br />
areas.<br />
Essentially, apart from having been influenced by the spatial demarcation of the former<br />
homeland areas, the spatial occurrence of settlements has been influenced by:<br />
· The spatial location of major agricultural and mining activity areas;<br />
· The spatial location of major rivers traversing the <strong>District</strong>; and<br />
· The spatial location of major roads such as the R37 and R579.<br />
Of utmost importance for the future spatial planning and development of the <strong>District</strong>, are the<br />
expected population concentration and growth areas. The reason being, that these areas not<br />
only serve to indicate where the greatest need for infrastructure spending could<br />
possibly be in the future, but also indicate where the municipality would receive the best<br />
value for money spent on infrastructure development and service provision. The<br />
existing Integrated Spatial Development Framework (ISDF) (2004) for the SDM identifies the<br />
expected population concentration and growth areas / points of the district.<br />
A. Population Growth Areas / Points<br />
Growth points are individual settlements or settlement areas which feature strong economic,<br />
social and institutional activities. Table 20 indicates the expected population growth points<br />
for the SDM.<br />
Table 20: Expected Population Growth Areas / Points for the SDM.
97<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> % of people Provincial <strong>District</strong> Municipal<br />
Residing in Growth Growth Growth Growth Points<br />
Points and Points Points<br />
Population<br />
Concentration<br />
Points<br />
Greater Tubatse 38% Burgersfort Steelpoort Mecklenburg<br />
Driekop<br />
Ohrigstad<br />
Ephraim Mogale 66% Marble Hall - Van Der<br />
Merweskraal<br />
Elandskraal<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 61% Groblersdal - Monsterlus<br />
Motetema<br />
Fetakgomo 39% - - Apel<br />
Makhuduthamaga 51% Jane Furse Phokwane<br />
Source: Integrated Spatial Development Framework for the SDM, 2004<br />
Of the total <strong>14</strong> growth points in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, 5 are situated within Greater Tubatse, followed<br />
by Elias Motsoaledi and Ephraim Mogale with 3 each, Makhuduthamaga with 2, and lastly<br />
Fetakgomo with only one growth point, (see figure 16).<br />
Figure 17- SDM Growth Point
98<br />
B. Local Service Points:<br />
This includes settlements that have the potential for development based on population<br />
growth, or servicing function potential. The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has a total of <strong>23</strong> settlements<br />
falling under this category. The distribution of these settlements, per municipality, is<br />
summarized as follows:<br />
· Fetakgomo (9);<br />
· Greater Tubatse (7),<br />
· Makhuduthamaga (4);<br />
· Elias Motsoaledi (2); and<br />
· Ephraim Mogale (1).<br />
The challenge facing the <strong>District</strong> will be to ensure the sustainable development of these<br />
population concentration and growth points, without neglecting the needs of the remaining<br />
extents of the <strong>Municipality</strong>.
99<br />
Economic Activity Concentration<br />
Economic Activity is predominantly concentrated in two areas, and include the local<br />
municipalities of Ephraim Mogale (former Greater Marble Hall), Elias Motsoaledi (former<br />
Groblersdal) to the West, and Tubatse to the East. These areas also host the five main<br />
urban centres. Whilst the South-Western economic activity area is primarily centred on<br />
platinum mining activities associated with the Merensky Reef.<br />
With less than ten percent (10%) of the total capacity of the Reef having been unlocked to<br />
date, the platinum economy is still within its infant stage. Tourism activities forming part of<br />
both of the economic activity areas are primarily related to Nature Tourism, Game Farming<br />
and Hunting.<br />
Figure 18- Centres of Agricultural Production<br />
Source:<br />
CENTRES OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION 4
100<br />
Figure 19 – Operational Mines in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Existing Land Use and Related Potential<br />
Land use is a complex issue, and is partially the result of the physical planning policies of the<br />
former apartheid government, which split the <strong>District</strong> between former homeland areas,<br />
private farms and small towns. Today, apart from issues pertaining to land ownership<br />
patterns, mining, agricultural and tourism activities bring distinctive spatial challenges of their<br />
own to the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
Presently, land use within the SDM is dominated by commercial and subsistence farming.<br />
This is especially true in the Fetakgomo, Makhuduthamaga, Ephraim Mogale and Greater<br />
Tubatse Local Municipal areas. The second most significant land use is the potential<br />
conservation areas, especially within the Elias Motsoaledi and Ephraim Mogale Municipal<br />
areas. These potential conservation areas may eventually encompass roughly one third of
101<br />
Elias Motsoaledi and Ephraim Mogale. The different land use patterns in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> are captured in Table 21 below.<br />
Table 21: Land Use Patterns in the SDM<br />
Land use type Area in sq km % of total<br />
Agricultural: Commercial 1,135 7,7<br />
Agricultural: Subsistence 2,683 18,1<br />
Potential conservation 3,484 <strong>23</strong>,5<br />
Active conservation 463 3,1<br />
Active mining 37 0,2<br />
Other 7,030 47,4<br />
Total <strong>14</strong>,832 100<br />
Source: Department of Land Affairs (2006). Land Cover Map cited in M Maila (2006)<br />
Disconcertingly, land is becoming an increasingly scarce commodity within the <strong>District</strong>. This<br />
is equally true of rural, semi-rural / semi-urban areas. This is a particularly significant<br />
situation, given the growing importance of agriculture, mining and tourism (all potentially<br />
conflicting land uses) to the <strong>District</strong>’s economy. Furthermore, the <strong>District</strong>’s developing<br />
economic nodes appear to be attracting an increasing number of people, thereby creating<br />
higher population concentrations in certain parts of the district. This is especially true of the<br />
Jane Furse – Phokwane development node in Makhuduthamaga, the Bothashoek-Praktiseer<br />
area (Tubatse) and the Atok Area (Fetakgomo).<br />
SPATIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES<br />
Transport Network<br />
As mentioned, the <strong>District</strong>’s transport network is largely limited to a number of arterials which<br />
provide regional accessibility, rather than local accessibility. From East to West, these<br />
include the N11, R25, R33, R579, R555, R37 and R36. Hence, regional accessibility is<br />
predominantly facilitated via three roads traversing the <strong>District</strong> in a North-West – South-East<br />
alignment (N11, R579 and R37), one road traversing the <strong>District</strong> in a North-East – South-<br />
West alignment (R555), and the R36. Together these roads constitute the main freight and<br />
logistics corridors connecting the <strong>District</strong>’s economic activity areas to prominent provincial<br />
nodes and economic activity areas falling outside of the <strong>District</strong> – e.g. Mookgopong,<br />
Mokopane, Polokwane, Lydenburg and Middleburg. The presence of the Klein Drakensberg<br />
and Strydpoortberge hinders connectivity to the north-east.<br />
More specifically, the N11 Freeway connects the town of Marble Hall and Groblersdal with<br />
Mookgopong and the N2 Freeway towards the North-West, which leads to Mokopane and<br />
Polokwane. To the South, the N11 connects Marble Hall and Groblersdal with Middleburg,<br />
which is situated along the N4 Maputo Corridor. The R579 traverses the central extents of<br />
the district, and serves to connect Jane Furse and Monsterlus with Lebowakgomo towards<br />
the North, and Sehlakwane and Stoffberg towards the South.
102<br />
The R37 traverses the northern extents of the <strong>District</strong>, and serves to connect Burgersfort<br />
with Lebowakgomo towards the North-West and Lydenburg towards the South-East the<br />
R555 traverses the Eastern extents of the district, and serves to connect Steelpoort and<br />
Burgersfort with Stoffberg towards the South-East. These two roads from the Dilokong<br />
Platinum Corridor, once past Burgersfort, R555 become the R36 which serves to connect<br />
the Burgersfort / Steelpoort area with Ohrigstad, and down to Lydenburg.<br />
Although the majority of the major urban centres and smaller towns are located along these<br />
roads, vast number of settlements within the Western, Central, and Eastern extents of the<br />
<strong>District</strong> are only accessible via secondary gravel roads. There is however relatively little<br />
economic activity within these areas to justify the construction of additional tar roads.<br />
The general condition of roads within the SDM is poor. Severe damage such as potholes,<br />
cracks, and rutting can be observed along most roads. Road damage is particularly<br />
prevalent along the following sections of road:<br />
· The R33 between Groblersdal and Stoffberg;<br />
· The R555 between Stofberg and Rossenekal;<br />
· The R579 between Nebo and Stofberg; and<br />
· The R25 between Dennilton and Groblersdal.<br />
To ensure alignment with the Limpopo Employment Growth and Development Plan<br />
(LEGDP), the <strong>District</strong> has prioritized its roads forming part of the Dilokong and Phalaborwa<br />
Corridors, and includes the following stretches of road;<br />
· The Dilokong Corridor<br />
- Polokwane to Burgersfort (P33/1 and P33/2) (R37), via Mafefe.<br />
- Flag Boshielo Dam through Lebowakgomo and Mafefe, linking the <strong>District</strong> with the<br />
Phalaborwa and Kruger National Park areas.<br />
- Chueniespoort via Boyne to Mankweng.<br />
· The Phalaborwa Corridor<br />
- Ohrigstad via the Strijdom Tunnel.<br />
- Burgersfort to Oaks.<br />
Apart from its road network, the SDM is served by three railway lines which were originally<br />
developed to support the mining activity within the district. The three railway lines are:<br />
· The railway line entering the SDM from the South, next to Stoffberg, from where it<br />
continues northwards for approximately 30km, eventually ending at an abandoned<br />
mine near the Mapochs Mine.
103<br />
· The railway line entering the SDM from the West, near Nutfield, from where it<br />
continues eastwards to Marble Hall.<br />
· The railway line entering the SDM from the East, passing near Ohrigstad and<br />
Burgersfort, and ending near Steelpoort (near the Tubatse mine).<br />
Unfortunately, these railway lines have not yet been extended or re-routed to serve later /<br />
new mining operations (such as those along the Merensky Reef and Chrome layers).<br />
Consequently, shortcomings in the railway network are resulting in extreme pressure being<br />
place on the road network. Favourably, a new commuter rail link between Pretoria and the<br />
South-West of the SDM (along the Moloto Road) is being considered. This rail link will<br />
improve accessibility to Gauteng, which represent an employment area for many residing<br />
within the South-Western extents of the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
In addition to the road and railway network of the <strong>District</strong>, two registered airfields are also<br />
found within the <strong>District</strong>. The airfields are located in Marble Hall and Groblersdal<br />
respectively, and primarily support crop spraying activities.<br />
Figure 20- SDM Transport Network<br />
Mining<br />
Modern mining has been practiced in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> for well over a century, and typically<br />
involved (as is still the case today) the extraction of and alusite, asbestos, chromite and<br />
platinum deposits from the Merensky Reef, which forms part of the mineral rich Bushveld
104<br />
Complex. In fact, the <strong>District</strong> features the world’s largest deposit of the platinum group<br />
metals (PGMs). What is striking about previous bouts of mining activity in the area is how<br />
changing commodity prices affected the opening, closing and, occasionally, re-opening of<br />
mines. When prices rose, new exploration and development took place in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
mining sector. Conversely, when prices fell, mines in the area closed. This is an important<br />
characteristic to take into consideration when providing infrastructure and housing to support<br />
expanding mining operations.<br />
Currently, 17 operational mines are found within the district, with the majority of activity<br />
situated along the Dilokong Corridor (R37 and R555). The Dilokong corridor stretches across<br />
the Fetakgomo and Greater Tubatse LMs respectively (see Figure 19). Some isolated<br />
activities are found within the Ephraim Mogale LM. Major mining companies operating in the<br />
SDM (2006) include Anglo Platinum, Xstrata, BHP Billiton, Implants, ASA Metals and Marula<br />
Platinum. In spite of the involvement of major mining companies, mining in the district has<br />
not yet reached full production limits. Consequently, a number of new developments are<br />
expected to take place. These include:<br />
- Eleven new platinum and chrome mines over the next three years, possibly creating<br />
17 000 direct jobs.<br />
- A R2 billion smelter plant is being considered for construction in Tubatse, possibly<br />
creating 1200 jobs.<br />
Figure 19 illustrates where the bulk of the platinum mining activity will take place within the<br />
<strong>District</strong> in the future. New mining activities within the Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi<br />
LMs could potentially create land use conflicts between mining and agricultural activities.<br />
Furthermore, new mining activities may result in increasing pressure being placed on<br />
environmentally sensitive areas found within the North-Eastern and South-Eastern extents of<br />
the <strong>District</strong>. Table 22 sets out the main existing (operational), and planned platinum mines in<br />
the district.<br />
Table 22: Existing (Operational) and Planned Mines in the SDM.<br />
Mine Controlling company Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Expansion in progress or production building up<br />
Lebowa Platinum Angloplat Fetakgomo LM<br />
Modikwa<br />
Angloplat<br />
Tubatse LM<br />
African Rainbow Minerals<br />
Mototolo Angloplat Tubatse LM<br />
Everest South Aquarius Within 30km of SDM<br />
Two Rivers African Rainbow Minerals Tubatse LM<br />
Marula UG2 Implants Tubatse LM<br />
Bankable feasibility study completed<br />
Blue Ridge Ridge Elias Motsoaledi LM<br />
Bankable feasibility study planned or underway<br />
Sheba’s Rige Ridge Elias Motsoaledi LM
105<br />
Mine Controlling company Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Smokey Hills Platinum Australia Tubatse LM<br />
Twickenham Angloplat Tubatse LM<br />
Mareesburg Eastern Plats Tubatse LM<br />
Marula Merensky Implants Tubatse LM<br />
Pre-feasibility study in progress or completed<br />
Kennedy’s Vale Eastern Plats Tubatse LM<br />
Der Brochen Angloplat Tubatse LM<br />
Booysensdal Angloplat Within 30km of SDM<br />
Advanced Exploration<br />
Ga-Phasha Angloplat Fetakgomo LM<br />
Loskop Boynton Elias Motsoaledi LM<br />
Early Exploration<br />
Grootboom Boynton Tubatse LM<br />
Tjate Jubilee Tubatse LM<br />
Kliprivier Nkwe Within 30km of SDM<br />
Tinderbox Placer Dome Elias Motsoaledi LM<br />
Berg Platfields Within 30km of SDM<br />
Source: Goode R and Granville, A (2006). Mining expansion and employment in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> land:<br />
Expectations and impediments<br />
The projected number of employment opportunities in platinum mining / near the SDM up to<br />
2015 is set out in Table <strong>23</strong>. Importantly, based on the below mentioned statistics,<br />
Burgersfort is set to become a city in the next 10-15 years.<br />
Table <strong>23</strong>: Projected Employment in Platinum Mining within / near the SDM up to 2015<br />
Year Production (k-oz) Employees<br />
2005 652 <strong>14</strong>,067<br />
2006 700 <strong>14</strong>,570<br />
2007 931 18,665<br />
2008 1,412 27,287<br />
2009 1,710 31,860<br />
2010 2,028 36,427<br />
2011 2,266 39,252<br />
2012 2,495 41,666<br />
<strong>2013</strong> 2,597 41,806<br />
20<strong>14</strong> 2,693 41,786<br />
2015 2,856 42,730<br />
Source: Goode, R and Granville, A (2006). Mining expansion and employment in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Land:<br />
Expectations and Impediments<br />
Agriculture
106<br />
Agriculture in the SDM is a mixture of both commercial and subsistence farming. The South-<br />
Western corner of the <strong>District</strong> (Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi LMs) specifically,<br />
contains one of the largest clusters of commercial agricultural production in South Africa<br />
(see Figure 18). However, in spite of being an important contributor to employment within<br />
the <strong>District</strong>, agriculture remains a relatively marginal contributor (approximately 9, 7%) to the<br />
aggregate GGP of the <strong>District</strong>. Water scarcity, and the uncertainty created by land claims are<br />
unfortunately discouraging the expansion of commercial agricultural activities.<br />
Essentially, commercial agriculture in the SDM is concentrated in two main areas:<br />
· The South-Western part of the <strong>District</strong> (near Groblersdal and Marble Hall) (the<br />
Loskop Scheme); and<br />
· The Eastern section of the <strong>District</strong> (near Burgersfort and Ohrigstad) (the Ohrigstad<br />
Scheme)<br />
Subsistence farming predominates in the ex-homeland areas of the north and western sides<br />
of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> district. These areas are dependent on dryland farming. The agricultural<br />
activities within these ex-homeland areas are however of a less-intensive nature and largely<br />
focused on subsistence.<br />
i. The Loskop Scheme<br />
The towns of Groblersdal and Marble Hall are found within the Loskop Valley. The<br />
commercial agricultural schemes in this valley are serviced by the Loskop Dam. In addition<br />
of the Loskop scheme, there are 5 smaller schemes within the Loskop agricultural area,<br />
namely:<br />
· The Moosrivier scheme;<br />
· The Hereford Scheme;<br />
· The Olifants River Scheme;<br />
· The Elands River Scheme; and<br />
· The Selons River Scheme.<br />
Collectively, these contribute significantly to commercial agriculture in the area.<br />
ii.<br />
The Ohrigstad scheme<br />
The Ohrigstad Scheme is supplied with irrigation water from the Ohrigstad Dam along the<br />
Ohrigstad River. The total area currently being irrigated is estimated at roughly 4,500<br />
hectares.<br />
Alternatively described, the agricultural activities within the SDM tend to be concentrated<br />
along the following routes:
107<br />
· The entire length of the N11 throughout the <strong>District</strong>;<br />
· The R573 from Ephraim Mogale to the <strong>District</strong> boundary;<br />
· The R25 between Dennilton and Groblersdal;<br />
· The minor road linking the R573 and R25 between Groblersdal and Marble Hall;<br />
· The R36 as far North as Branddraai; and<br />
· The Southern section of the R37 as far North as Burgersfort<br />
Tourism<br />
The <strong>District</strong> hosts the scenic Flag Boshielo Dam area, the adjoining Schuinsdraai Nature<br />
Reserve, Potlake Nature Reserve and the Maleoskop Resort and Conservancy.<br />
Furthermore, the <strong>District</strong> has recently established the Kamoka Open Africa Route, which<br />
could be linked with the existing African Ivory and Cultural Heartland routes and the planned<br />
Great Limpopo Route.<br />
Currently, an estimated 84 accommodation facilities, offering 2,627 beds are found<br />
throughout the SDM. The tourism sector also employs approximately 962 persons. The table<br />
below sets out the accommodation facilities currently available in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
Table 24: Accommodation Facilities in the SDM.<br />
Municipal Area No. of No. of Occupancy Turnover Staff<br />
Facilities Beds rate (%)<br />
Employment<br />
Tubatse 20 1,278 67 47,200,000 432<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 24 577 59 20,200,000 222<br />
Ephraim Mogale 29 677 54 <strong>23</strong>,000,000 260<br />
Fetakgomo 1 20 n/a 200,000 12<br />
Makhuduthamaga 6 75 62 2,600,000 36<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 81 2,627 62 93 200,000 962<br />
Yet, in spite of existing tourism attractions and facilities, and although tourism has been<br />
identified as one of the major growth sectors in the SDM, the <strong>District</strong> lacks a major product to<br />
draw a significant volume of holiday tourists to the area. A major draw card could however<br />
firmly place <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> on established tourist routes to the Blyde River Canyon and Kruger<br />
Park.<br />
Spatial Development Objectives<br />
The following are the development objectives to be achieved as part of the Spatial<br />
Development Framework for the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>:<br />
· To actively protect, enhance and manage the natural environmental resources in the<br />
municipality in order to ensure a sustainable equilibrium between the mining, tourism<br />
and agricultural industries in the area.
108<br />
· To optimally capitalize on the strategic location of the <strong>District</strong> by way of strengthening<br />
of internal and external linkages within provincial and regional context.<br />
· To utilized the natural environmental and cultural historic features in the <strong>District</strong> as<br />
anchors from which to promote ecotourism and conservation.<br />
· To maximally utilize the mining potential in the district by way of the development of<br />
the Dilokong Corridor.<br />
· To promote commercial farming and food production along the Olifants River and<br />
Steelpoort River drainage systems in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
· To facilitate small scale and subsistence farming activities throughout the remainder<br />
part of the municipal area.<br />
· To promote industrial/commercial development in the <strong>District</strong> with specific emphasis<br />
on Agri-processing in the agricultural belt (Groblersdal), and mining/ore-processing in<br />
the mining belt and agricultural belt to one another, and to the other markets of<br />
Gauteng Province along the Moloto Corridor.<br />
· To supplement the <strong>District</strong> east-west corridor by way of three functional north-south<br />
corridors:<br />
- N11: Agriculture, Commercial<br />
- R583: Institutional, Residential<br />
- R33: Mining<br />
· To ensure equitable access to social infrastructure and to promote Local Economic<br />
Development by way of an evenly distributed range of Multi-Purpose Community<br />
Centres to be established throughout the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
· To consolidate the urban structure of the district around the highest order centres by<br />
way infill development and densification in Strategic Development Areas.<br />
· To establish a functional hierarchy of towns and settlements in the <strong>District</strong> based on<br />
the regional function and spatial distribution of these centres.<br />
Strategic Development Areas<br />
The currently dispersed settlement structure of the <strong>District</strong> has not only resulted in the costly<br />
duplication of essential community services and infrastructure, but has left some<br />
communities without access to these. Hence, proper planning in respect of the placement of<br />
the provision of resources is necessary to bring about an even, equitable, and cost-effective<br />
distribution of essential community services and infrastructure throughout the entire<br />
municipal area.<br />
To achieve this, the SDF proposes the establishment of a functional hierarchy of towns<br />
and settlements, as well as the establishment of a hierarchy of service centres<br />
throughout the entire municipal area by way of Multi-Purpose Community Centre (MPCC)<br />
development. Such an approach to the delivery of community services is aligned with both<br />
Comprehensive Rural Development Strategy, and the DM’s LED strategy which strives to<br />
promote nodal development. Establishing a hierarchy of services centres in the form of<br />
MPCCs holds the following advantages:
109<br />
· Contributes towards urban-rural restructuring and environmental protection by means<br />
of promoting nodal development. Nodal development is conducive to targeted<br />
infrastructure spending, local economic development and corridor development;<br />
· Promotes comprehensive regional development;<br />
· Helps to speed-up infrastructure development and service delivery;<br />
· Reduces the levels of inequality in living standards and access to basic services<br />
between rural and urban areas – ensures that all communities have access to at<br />
least the minimum levels of services as enshrined in the constitution;<br />
· Basic services are provided by government in a financially sustainable manner;<br />
· Provides government with a platform from which to develop energy centres, telecentres<br />
and information technology infrastructure within rural areas;<br />
· Provides a platform for entrepreneurship and small business development (LED);<br />
· Provides guidance for the development and provision of engineering services:<br />
· Indicates where to provide tarred road infrastructure and multi-modal transport<br />
facilities; and<br />
· Helps to determine public transport service points and routes.<br />
In terms of establishing a hierarchy of towns and settlements for the <strong>District</strong>, the SDF<br />
proposes the following (see Figure 20):<br />
Table 25: Hierarchy of settlements<br />
1 st order Settlements<br />
Provincial Growth <strong>District</strong> Growth Municipal Growth Points<br />
Points<br />
Points<br />
Marble Hall,<br />
Burgersfort,<br />
Groblersdal<br />
Steelpoort and Jane<br />
Furse<br />
Ga- Nchabeleng<br />
Ga- Nkwana<br />
Maesela-<br />
Mahlabaphooko<br />
Makurwaneng<br />
Masweneng<br />
Sesehu<br />
Elandskraal<br />
Van Der Merves<br />
kraal<br />
Hlogotlou<br />
Mmotwaneng<br />
Monsterlus Town<br />
Phokwane<br />
Tafelkop<br />
Thabaleboto<br />
Orighstad<br />
Mooihoek<br />
Mashibishane<br />
Magakale<br />
Driekop<br />
Ga-kgete<br />
Dipururung<br />
Mochadi<br />
Mogodi<br />
Mohlarekoma<br />
Nebo<br />
Tlame<br />
Primary Nodes<br />
- Burgersfort as the primary mining and industrial node of the <strong>District</strong>.
110<br />
- Marble Hall as the primary business and agricultural node of the district.<br />
- Groblersdal as the primary business and agricultural node of the district.<br />
Based on a 20km services radius, the above mentioned nodes will be able to service almost<br />
the entire municipal area, if developed to their full potential. A number of settlements will<br />
however still be isolated from the services offered by these nodes, which reinforces the need<br />
for the development of MPCCs throughout the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
Secondary Nodes<br />
- Steelpoort<br />
- Jane Furse<br />
- Ohristad<br />
These nodes primarily been identified based on their regional accessibility, their central<br />
locations within the two primary economic activity areas, their status as growth points, and<br />
for coinciding with existing or proposed new bulk water distribution infrastructure.<br />
As mentioned, in order to bring about an even, equitable, and cost-effective distribution of<br />
essential community services and infrastructure throughout the entire municipal area, the<br />
SDF also proposes the establishment of a hierarchy of service centres, based on a 10km<br />
services radius (see Figure 6).<br />
Taking into consideration the overall development strategy for the <strong>District</strong>, which seeks to<br />
consolidate the fragment and dispersed settlement structure, the SDF proposes a phased<br />
development approach. This implies that the <strong>Municipality</strong> should first develop all the 1 st<br />
Order Priority MPCCs, before moving onto the second and third order ones. The<br />
development order, total number, and spatial location of the proposed services centres, were<br />
determined by taking into consideration the growth points, the population concentration<br />
points, the primary and secondary routes, as well as existing and proposed bulk<br />
infrastructure.<br />
Importantly, to ensure that the <strong>Municipality</strong> lives up to its Constitutional obligation whilst<br />
striving to consolidate the dispersed settlement structure, the SDF proposes that the<br />
proposed Thusong Service Centres (TSC) should form the focal point of infrastructure<br />
provision within the rural extents of the DM.<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> is spread over former homeland areas, commercial farms, towns<br />
and semi-urban centres. According to the Limpopo Spatial Rationale Study (2002),<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has roughly 605 settlements which are fairly dispersed. There are a number of<br />
ways of classifying settlement patterns. A particularly useful delineation, however, may be<br />
found in the Integrated Spatial Development Framework, which identifies four dominant<br />
Patterns in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />
This includes first order settlements, which encompasses all provincial, district and local<br />
growth points. In addition, second order settlements are those areas with a sizeable
NP 364<br />
M ookgo po ng<br />
NP354<br />
Pol ok wa ne<br />
CBL C3<br />
Mar bl e Hal l<br />
CBD MA 3<br />
NP 355<br />
Lep ell e-N k um pi<br />
CBL C4<br />
Gr ob ler sda l<br />
NP 03A3<br />
Feta kg om o<br />
NP 03A2<br />
Mak hudu tam ag a<br />
C BLC 5<br />
Tub atse<br />
NP 04A1<br />
Dr ake nsber g<br />
111<br />
population but that are found outside the primary first order settlements. Third order<br />
settlements are local services points with some potential for future growth. Finally, fourth<br />
order settlements are scattered small settlements with very little potential for growth.<br />
The first order settlements are of particular interest to this <strong>IDP</strong>. In 1999, the Limpopo Spatial<br />
Rationale identified the following:<br />
Table 26: Growth Points in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> % of people Provincial<br />
residing in growth growth points<br />
points<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
growth points<br />
Municipal<br />
growth points<br />
Tubatse 38% Burgersfort Steelpoort Mecklenburg<br />
Driekop<br />
Ohrigstad<br />
Ephraim Mogale 66% Marble Hall N/A Van Der<br />
Merweskraal<br />
Elandskraal<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 61% Groblersdal N/A Monstelus<br />
Motetema<br />
Fetakgomo 39% N/A N/A Apel<br />
Makhuduthamaga 51% N/A Jane Furse Phokwane<br />
Source: Limpopo Spatial Rationale (1999), reproduced in SDM undated). Integrated Spatial Development<br />
Framework<br />
This is graphically depicted in the map below.<br />
Figure 21 – Growth points in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
Mop an i<br />
DC33<br />
Cap rico rn<br />
DC35<br />
CB D C4<br />
Boh labela<br />
DC36<br />
Wat erberg<br />
CBD C3<br />
Sek huk hun e<br />
Clusters<br />
Provincial G rowth Point<br />
<strong>District</strong> Growth Point<br />
Municipal Grow th Point<br />
Population Concentration Point<br />
Local Services Point
112<br />
Source: Procurement Dynamics (undated). Synthesis report of the research<br />
Stimulating the continued development of these growth points, whilst simultaneously<br />
ensuring balanced sustainable development throughout the <strong>District</strong>, is likely to be a key<br />
challenge for the municipality in the next few years.<br />
Land Use<br />
Land use within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> is dominated by subsistence farming. This is<br />
especially true in the Fetakgomo, Makhuduthamaga, Ephraim Mogale and Greater Tubatse<br />
municipal areas.<br />
The second significant land use is the potential conservation areas, especially within the<br />
Elias Motsoaledi and Ephraim Mogale municipal areas. These potential conservation areas<br />
may eventually encompass roughly one third of Elias Motsoaledi and Marble Hall.<br />
The different land use patterns in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> are captured in the table below.<br />
Table 27: Land use patterns in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Land use types Area in sq km % of total<br />
Agricultural: Commercial 1,135 7,7<br />
Agricultural: Subsistence 2,683 18,1<br />
Potential conservation 3,484 <strong>23</strong>,5<br />
Active conservation 463 3,1<br />
Active mining 37 0,2<br />
Other 7,030 47,4<br />
Total <strong>14</strong>,832 100<br />
Source: Department of Land Affairs (2006). Land Cover Map. Cited in M Maila (2006), op cit<br />
It is also becoming apparent that land is growing increasingly scarce in the <strong>District</strong>, within the<br />
urban, rural and semi-rural areas equally. <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> and Local Municipalities have<br />
recognized this as a challenge, and have prioritized the issue. This is particularly significant<br />
given the growing importance of agriculture, mining and tourism – all potentially conflicting<br />
land uses – to the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy.<br />
Land Use Management<br />
An even more complex issue within the <strong>District</strong>, however, is that of land use management.<br />
The land issue is a potentially difficult one in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, with the <strong>District</strong> being governed<br />
by a dual system. Under the traditional system, land allocation (and, therefore, land use) is<br />
the prerogative of tribal council – and this system dominates in much of the <strong>District</strong>’s formal<br />
towns and, to some extent, the adjacent townships.<br />
The traditional system is rendered more complex by the fact that each of the approximately<br />
70 traditional authorities in the area has its own unique land use management system. In<br />
general, however, each traditional authority allocates land to a subject for either residential
113<br />
use or subsistence farming. In addition, subjects would also have unlimited access to<br />
communal grazing system, however, is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain, given the<br />
growing demand for land (for s range of purposes). Furthermore, the traditional land use<br />
management system is unwritten and therefore often subject to interpretation.<br />
In recent years, the boundaries between different traditional authority areas have become<br />
increasingly blurred. This has led, in part, to the lodging of competing land claims in many<br />
parts of the <strong>District</strong>¹. It has also led to the growth of informal settlement activities within some<br />
traditional authority areas. This is especially prevalent around district growth points like<br />
Burgersfort, Atok and Jane Furse and is undoubtedly a reflection of economic migration<br />
towards potential centres of economic activity.<br />
Recent trends<br />
According to background research done for the <strong>District</strong>’s 2025 Development Strategy,<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s developing economic nodes appear to be attracting an increasing number of<br />
people, thereby creating higher population concentrations in certain parts of the <strong>District</strong>. This<br />
is especially true of the Jane Furse-Phokwane Development node in Makhuduthamaga, as<br />
well as the Bothashoek-Praktiseer area (Tubatse) and the Atok area (Fetakgomo).<br />
In the hinterlands, by contrast, land uses such as conservation appear to be developing<br />
more rapidly. This is particularly the case within the local municipal areas of Ephraim<br />
Mogale, Elias Motsoaledi and Tubatse.<br />
Finally, the central municipal areas of Makhuduthamaga and Fetakgomo are characterized<br />
by mixed land uses of subsistence farming and residential uses.<br />
Land issues may lead to future social tensions<br />
In summary, the land issue is potentially a source of tension in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area. There<br />
is a latent tension between the traditional (tribal council) and modern (legalized) land use<br />
management systems. There is also a number of competing land claims in the area, which<br />
have not been resolved by the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform<br />
(DRDLR) as yet. Finally, as the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy boom, there is likely to be competing<br />
land demands by the different economic sectors. If the district population grows in response<br />
to this foreseen economic boom, domestic demand for (commercial and residential) land will<br />
become a competitor in this arena as well.<br />
Land claims in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
The total numbers of 850 land claims, which cover 75% of the land in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, are also<br />
causing major land shortages for the district. Most of these claims are not likely to be<br />
resolved soon as they are on tribal land and need tenure reform rather than restitution. The<br />
Act that will cover tenure reform in South Africa is still a Bill. This means that 75% of the land<br />
in the district will still remain under dispute for the foreseeable future.
1<strong>14</strong><br />
The nature of number of claims in the district makes development difficult, particularly as we<br />
are faced with competing claims and those lodged by one chief against another. These kinds<br />
of claims have the greatest potential of causing instability amongst communities – and it is a<br />
situation that we as a <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> need to monitor carefully. However, it also requires<br />
high-level interventions from other spheres of government.<br />
The modern land use management system, on the contrary, is based on fairly systematic<br />
recording of land use rights. This system compels land developers to develop their individual<br />
land plots within the parameters of a particular zoning scheme. This type of land use<br />
management occurs largely in the formalized towns such as Burgersfort, Ephraim Mogale<br />
and Groblersdal.<br />
Land use management in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, then, is a complex issue that requires interventions<br />
on a number of different fronts. There are currently some measures to address the situation.<br />
The Limpopo Department of Local Government and Housing, for instance, is assisting the<br />
local municipalities with the development and review of Spatial Development Frameworks<br />
(SDFs) which will address some of these problems. In addition, the <strong>District</strong> is also<br />
conducting land use awareness programme for various stakeholders as well as developing<br />
district wide Land Use Management Schemes. However, much more needs to be done to<br />
resolve the municipality of spatial issues in the district. Once resolved, these will unlock<br />
enormous development potential in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />
3.2.3. Challenges<br />
Land ownership patterns are one of the biggest development challenges facing <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />
Without a resolution of this issue, most socio-economic activities in the <strong>District</strong> will continue<br />
to be thwarted.<br />
The Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003 are in operation and<br />
have been implemented in Limpopo Province. The Act has enabled the MEC for Local<br />
Government and Housing to appoint representatives of the Traditional Leaders in the area of<br />
the jurisdiction of the SDM to participate in the SDM Council as provided for in the Systems<br />
Act.<br />
Land administration remains a bone of contention between the traditional and the municipal<br />
administrations. Land administration needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency for<br />
effective development of rural communities. Our five municipalities remain with a challenge<br />
of land allocation for either residential or development priorities because traditional<br />
leadership are also having the responsibilities of allocating sites to residents. Traditional<br />
leaders allocate sites without engaging the municipalities to ascertain issues relating to<br />
township establishment and land development requirements. Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
is the case in point that needs to be addressed to effect development. The <strong>District</strong>, Local<br />
municipalities and traditional leadership should devise a system of engagement and<br />
cooperation in order to address some of these challenges.
115<br />
The question of service boundaries for Provincial and National spheres of government needs<br />
further attention with a view of alignment of these with municipal boundaries to facilitate<br />
service delivery. A lot still needs to be done for well, proper and coordinated service delivery<br />
in our communities.<br />
More specifically, the key challenges are:<br />
· Uncertainty about the status of land ownership especially with reference to state and<br />
tribal land prohibits future development and investments.<br />
· Unresolved and competing land claims in the area threaten to destabilize future<br />
development.<br />
· Increasing number of Informal settlements and housing backlog as mining and<br />
agriculture activities intensify<br />
· Competing land uses (i.e. mining and agriculture, Commercial, etc.) may cause<br />
spatial, social, environmental and economic constraints in future.<br />
· Lack of environmental management<br />
· Communal land use management<br />
· Sprawled development<br />
· Lack of adequate water to supply all settlements<br />
· Some nodal points like Jane Furse have not yet been planned and proclaimed<br />
thereby limiting the growth potential of the node.<br />
3.3. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL<br />
TRANSFORMATION<br />
3.3.1. Powers and Funtions of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
• Water<br />
• Sanitation<br />
• Fire fighting<br />
• Local Tourism<br />
• Municipal Airport except for Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi<br />
• Municipal Planning<br />
• Municipal Health Services<br />
• Municipal Public Transport<br />
• Markets
116<br />
• Municipal Roads for Fetakgomo<br />
• Storm water for Tubatse, Makhuduthamaga and Fetakgomo<br />
• Cemeteries except for Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi<br />
• Municipal Abattoirs<br />
• Refuse removal, refuse dumps and solid waste disposal for Fetakgomo<br />
3.3.2. Organizational Structure<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE: <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> -2015/2016<br />
The proposed organisational structure is made of 1122 posts from 1080 posts. There is an<br />
increase of 42 posts from 1080. There are 789 funded posts available. There are a total of<br />
342 vacant posts in the proposed organisational structure of which nine (9) are funded. The<br />
remaining 329 posts will be funded during the financial year <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> based on their<br />
strategic functioning and availability of funds. The remainder of the vacant post will be<br />
funded in the ensuing Integrated Development Plan cycle.<br />
The major focus of the proposed organizational structure is the strengthening of Budget and<br />
Treasury, Community Services and Infrastructure & Water Services. In Budget and Treasury<br />
the focus is mainly on billing. The intention of the municipality is to take over billing from local<br />
municipalities and general financial management with special attention to improving internal<br />
controls. In Community Services there are two issues that require attention, mainly<br />
compliance and capacity enhancement. A new division responsible for disaster management<br />
is proposed to ensure segregation of duties between disaster management and emergency<br />
services. In addition more staff is required in emergency services to address acute shortage<br />
of staff and address compliance issues.<br />
The provision of reliable water services depends on the capacity of infrastructure and water<br />
services. To ensure that requisite capacity is available, additional post of pump operators<br />
and plump operators are suggested. This number of pump operators will address the<br />
shortage of man power which is currently provided by volunteers.<br />
Furthermore the draft organisational structure suggests the relocation of Fleet and Facilities<br />
from Budget and Treasury to Corporate Services. In addition Payroll is suggested to be<br />
relocated from Corporate Services to Budget and Treasury.<br />
Below is the elaborate for additional posts per department:<br />
1. OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER<br />
There is no new position proposed.<br />
2. MUNICIPAL MANAGER `S OFFICE
117<br />
There are 3 new proposed posts:<br />
· The post of Manager is proposed to deal with organizational performance and<br />
performance of the Executive Management.<br />
· The post of Senior Internal Officer is proposed to deal with IT and regulatory audit.<br />
· The additional post of Internal Auditor is proposed to enhance the capacity of the<br />
internal audit unit to handle their functions accurately.<br />
3. OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR<br />
There are 16 new positions proposed:<br />
· The post of Manager is proposed to deal with customer care. The rationale for the<br />
proposal is that issues on query management have been elevated.<br />
· The post of Marketing Officer is proposed to handle the marketing functions which<br />
were previously located in the department of planning and Economic Development.<br />
· The position of Website Development is proposed to ensure that website is properly<br />
managed. The function of website administration was moved from corporate services<br />
office to the Executive Mayor’s Office.<br />
· The post of photographer is proposed to provide expertise in the production of<br />
newsletters.<br />
· The post of Communication Officer is abolished and replaced by the post of the<br />
Marketing Officer.<br />
· The post of the Head of Security is proposed to provide for the security details of the<br />
Executive Mayor.<br />
· The post of Policy and IGR is proposed to deal with the Policy and IGR conditions.<br />
These areas did not have a dictated unit to handle.<br />
· The additional nine posts of call centre operators are proposed to provide for 24 hour<br />
services in line with requirements of the function.<br />
· The new post of Call Centre Officer is proposed to control room.<br />
4. CORPORATE SERVICES<br />
There are 12 new post proposed:<br />
· The post of OD Officer is proposed to have the required capacity to deal with the job<br />
evaluation function. The process of evaluating jobs is quiet demanding and requires<br />
dedicated personnel. As the district we are going to handle job evaluation for all the<br />
five local municipalities.<br />
· The function of individual PMS is relocating from Corporate Services to Planning and<br />
Economic Development.<br />
· The additional post of Labour Relations Officer is proposed to complement the unit.<br />
Currently there are two Officers and there is an official seconded to help in the<br />
division.
118<br />
· The post of IT Technician is proposed to capacitate the division. There is a project to<br />
extend the IT Infrastructure to all the regional offices and depots and this will require<br />
additional hands.<br />
· The post of Training Officer is proposed to help in dealing with some of the neglected<br />
functions of training namely, assessment of the impact of training interventions.<br />
· The additional post of EAP Officer is proposed to increase the capacity of the Unit to<br />
assist dealing with the welfare of the employees. Currently there is one EAP Officer<br />
and she is not coping with the demands of the organization.<br />
· The post of OHS clerk is proposed to ensure that compliance with OHS is met.<br />
Currently there is no OHS Clerk who must attend to all OHS requirements in all the<br />
work stations.<br />
· The post of Senior Facility Officer, Fleet Officer, two Facility Clerks are proposed to<br />
augment the section. Furthermore two posts of general workers are proposed to help<br />
the handyman to deal with maintenance work.<br />
5. COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
There are 33 new post proposed:<br />
· The two posts of Disaster Officers are proposed to ensure that disaster management<br />
is undertaken in all the five (5) Local Municipalities.<br />
· The post of Principal is proposed to ensure that there is accountability on the part of<br />
the training academy.<br />
· The post of the Chief Fire Inspector is proposed to comply with the fire act and also<br />
to deal with the demands of the farming community and rapid industrialisation in the<br />
distinct.<br />
· The eight additional posts of Leading Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum<br />
shifts.<br />
· The eight additional posts of Senior Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum<br />
shifts.<br />
· The eight additional post of Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum shifts<br />
6. INFRASTRUCTURE AND WATER SERVICES<br />
There are 243 new proposed posts. The majority of the posts are pump operators<br />
and plant Operators. Special focus is also paid to enforcement of municipal<br />
regulations, thus a creation of a post to administer water authority issues.<br />
· The post of Deputy Director Water Authority is proposed, 2 Secretaries for<br />
administration of the two deputy directors.<br />
· The Division Regulation and Governance is proposed to be under the Water<br />
Authority Sub-department, 1Manager, 2Monitoring and Evaluation Officer,<br />
furthermore the division of Strategic Planning is suggested with newly created<br />
positions of 2 Technicians.<br />
· The PMU division proposed 1 Senior Project Manager and 1 Data Capturer.
119<br />
· The Water Provider sub-department under Bulk Operations division suggested 8<br />
positions that are dependent on section 78 process.<br />
· The Reticulation and Sanitation Division suggested 3 Artisan Plumbers, 3 General<br />
Worker and 5 Admin clerk for administration of the Regional offices.<br />
· The 167 new posts of pump operators are proposed to ensure that there is a reliable<br />
water provision. Currently the function is performed by volunteers and this proposal is<br />
aimed at dealing with issues of volunteers to create sustainability<br />
· The 46 new posts of plant operators are proposed to enhance the capacity of the<br />
municipality to provide continuous operation of water treatment works and<br />
wastewater treatment works.<br />
· The Scientific Services suggested 1 Lab Technician and 1 Lab Assistant<br />
· The Electro Mechanical Division suggested 1 Admin Clerk for administration<br />
purpose.<br />
7. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />
There are 3 proposed new positions:<br />
· There is a new division named <strong>IDP</strong> and PMS, therefore a Manager and 1 <strong>IDP</strong> Officer<br />
post are proposed. The migrating function of PMS from Corporate services will be<br />
performed in this division.<br />
· The post of LED officer is proposed to deal with tourism.<br />
8. BUDGET AND TREASURY<br />
There are 38 proposed new posts:<br />
· The two additional posts of Accountants are proposed, one Accountant will deal with<br />
AFS and reporting.<br />
· The additional post of billing clerk is proposed to provide an additional capacity<br />
· The two additional posts of Credit Control Clerk are proposed to increase capacity to<br />
cope with the demands<br />
· The post of Indigent Clerk is proposed to enhance the capacity became the port<br />
· The two additional post of Data Capturers are proposed to capture information from<br />
meter readers<br />
· The post of Chief Meter Reader is proposed to enhance capacity for implementation<br />
of water services, particularly billing.<br />
· The twenty new post of meter readers are proposed to ensure that the takeover of<br />
billing function from local municipalities is properly handled and also the extension of<br />
billing to new areas are explored.<br />
· The additional post of Cashier is proposed to increase capacity.<br />
· The new post of Accounting Clerk is proposed to deal with filing of all vat returns,<br />
reconciliations and invoice files and preparation of audit files for all account balances<br />
within the trial Balance.
120<br />
· The additional post of Senior Procurement Officer is proposed to deal with demand<br />
and performance Management.<br />
· The additional post of Asset Officer is proposed to assist with the reconciliation of<br />
stock counts and asset register.<br />
· The five new post of Stores Clerks are proposed to assist the regional Offices<br />
Below is the top structure of the district and the complete structure can be viewed in<br />
Annexure B
121<br />
COUNCIL<br />
EXECUTIVE MAYOR OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER OFFICE OF THE CHIEF WHIP
122<br />
OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER<br />
PURPOSE : To provide strategic administrative support to the council<br />
and ensure legislative compliant environment.<br />
FUNCTIONS:<br />
1.Monitor effectiveness of service delivery departments.<br />
1.1 Community services.<br />
1.2 Infrastructure and water services.<br />
1.3 Planning and economic development.<br />
2.Monitor effectiveness of support departments.<br />
2.1 Executive mayor's office<br />
2.2 Corporate services<br />
2.3 Budget and treasury<br />
1x Municipal Manager<br />
1x Chief Operations Officer<br />
1x Personal Assistant<br />
1x Secretary<br />
INTERNAL AUDIT<br />
Purpose: To provide an independant,<br />
objective assurance and consulting<br />
activity designed to add value and<br />
improve an organisation controls, risk<br />
management and governance processes.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Regularity audits.<br />
2. Performance audits.<br />
3.Information systems /IT audits.<br />
4.Investigation and adhok.<br />
1x Chief Audit Executive<br />
2x Senior Internal Auditor (1 new)<br />
4x Internal Auditor (1new)<br />
RISK MANAGEMENT<br />
Purpose: To manage the risk<br />
management function in line with<br />
corporate management strategy.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Risk assesment.<br />
2.Risk financing.<br />
3.Anti fraud & corruptions.<br />
4.Complaince management.<br />
5.Risk control.<br />
1x Chief Risk Officer<br />
2x Senior Risk Officer<br />
2x Risk Officer<br />
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT<br />
Purpose: To coordinate PMS for section<br />
56 employees.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Facilitate employment contracts and<br />
performance agreement.<br />
2.Coordinate quartely, mid year and<br />
annual reviews.<br />
3.Liase with sector departments for<br />
statutory reporting requirements.<br />
1x Manager (new)<br />
Executive<br />
Mayor's<br />
Office<br />
Corporate<br />
Services<br />
Community<br />
Services<br />
Infrastructure<br />
& Water<br />
Services<br />
Planning &<br />
Economic<br />
Development<br />
Budget &<br />
Treasury
1<strong>23</strong><br />
3.3.3. Human Resources Management (HRM)<br />
Introduction<br />
The role of the Human Resources Administration deals mainly with management of human<br />
resources. This refers to recruitment (talent attraction), staff retention, terminations, leave<br />
administration, payroll, implementation of Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, and human<br />
resource policy development and implementation.<br />
The function of Human Resource Administration is informed by the following statutory and<br />
legal framework:<br />
· Public Services Act, 1994<br />
· Employment Equity Act, 1998<br />
· Basic Conditions of Employment, 1997<br />
· Municipal Systems Act, 2000<br />
· Municipal Systems Amendment Act, 2011<br />
Status Quo<br />
Recruitment: currently all essential and critical posts at senior management level are filled<br />
e.g. Municipal Manager and Director of Infrastructure and Water Services. The main<br />
challenge facing the Division in recruitment is that appropriate candidates in certain rare<br />
skills are difficult to find in the market, especially during selection process (interviews).<br />
Staff retention/terminations: there are turnover/resignations in the SDM which is less than<br />
11%. The staff retention strategy needs to be implemented more effectively. The strategy<br />
cannot solve all the reasons for resignations, which means it is limited. However the strategy<br />
would be reviewed so that it becomes effective tool to deal with the challenges of the work<br />
environment. The turnover and absenteeism are used to monitor the quality of work life in<br />
the workplace.<br />
Leave administration: all types of leave administrations are currently running well. The<br />
systems used are ESS (electronic) and manual administration. Handicaps include<br />
managers/directors not approving leave requests on time. On average, the total work force<br />
takes less than 17% of leaves monthly. Hence the leave management is still controllable in<br />
the context of people management.<br />
Payroll: payroll is also running well on average. Some of the administrative challenges facing<br />
the Division includes: overtime and travel claims that reach payroll section very late and the<br />
understaffing in the Unit. However with regard to overtime and travel claims, a decision is<br />
taken than all claims should reach the Corporate Services Department on or before the 3 of<br />
every month as an internal control measure.
124<br />
Employment Equity: the Division successfully submits employment equity report annually on<br />
the first of October. Generally the area is running well because of 3 year cycle of<br />
Employment Equity Plan which will expire 30 June 20<strong>14</strong>. The implementation of EE targets<br />
are done together with the Department of Labour. The main challenge is to factor in women<br />
in top and senior management.<br />
Human resource policy development and implementation: currently being implemented well.<br />
However, challenges identified are dealt adequately in the Policy review which is currently<br />
unfolding.<br />
Challenges to be addressed by the HRA Unit<br />
- Shortage of competent personnel<br />
- Staff turnover<br />
- Non-compliance on leave administration<br />
- Payment of penalties from third parties<br />
- Non-compliance to employment Equity Plan<br />
- Non-compliance to HR policies<br />
3.3.4. Human Resources Development (HRD)<br />
Introduction<br />
The Human Resources Development division is comprised of a manager and two training<br />
officers.<br />
Status Quo: Human Resource Development<br />
The division manages issues relating to workplace skills planning and facilitates skills<br />
development for the community through a variety of interventions such as Internships and<br />
learnership. The division also manages the Bursary Scheme of the Council of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
Skills needs within the municipal council<br />
The inception of Local Government sphere has de-facto opened a life-long unnoticed<br />
challenge of capacity among the public service and municipal employees. The passing of the<br />
Skills Development Act no.97 of 1998 is aimed at capacitating the above mentioned<br />
employees through training in order to redress legacies of the past.<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> develops the Workplace Skills Plan annually in<br />
consultation with its employees and councillors to analyse the skills needs. This exercise is
125<br />
done in the form of a questionnaire that is distributed among the stakeholders. The following<br />
are the critical skills among the staff members:<br />
‣ Engineering<br />
‣ IT<br />
‣ Legal<br />
‣ Municipal Finance<br />
The councillors need capacity building in the fields that are much related to areas of<br />
oversight responsibility. Those areas or fields are the following:<br />
‣ Supply Chain Management<br />
‣ Executive Leadership Management<br />
‣ Human Resource Management in Local Government<br />
‣ Labour Relations<br />
‣ Project Management<br />
These needs are consolidated and form part of the WSP that should be approved by council.<br />
They are then submitted to LGSETA that will assist in training to address the scarce skills<br />
challenge.<br />
Challenges to be addressed by the Human Resource Development<br />
· Development of a credible workplace skills plan to guide training in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
· Development of a skills development programme for unemployed members of the<br />
community.<br />
In terms of the Systems Act of 2000 as amended sec 68 states that (1) a <strong>Municipality</strong> must<br />
develop its human resource capacity to a level that enables it to perform its functions and<br />
exercise its powers in an economical, effective, efficient and accountable way, and for this<br />
purpose must comply with the Skills Development Act, 1998 (Act No.81 of 1998), and Skills<br />
Development Levies Act (Act No. 28 of 1999).<br />
3.3.5. Employee Assistance Programme (EAP)<br />
Introduction<br />
The main purpose of EAP is to assist employees with personal and work related problems.<br />
The aim thereof is to enhance performance as well as production of employees. The focus is<br />
also on reactive and proactive wellness programs. Reactive wellness programs focuses on<br />
existing problems of employees. Proactive wellness programs are preventative programs<br />
that prevent problems from occurring in future.
126<br />
The main purpose of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) is to facilitate management of<br />
physical health of employees as affected by working conditions and to monitor municipal<br />
service areas. This will ensure that employees work in a healthy and safe environment.<br />
Status Quo<br />
Employee wellness<br />
Currently under the reactive program the Unit is focusing on the following:<br />
· Marital problems<br />
· Family conflicts<br />
· Bereavement support<br />
· Divorce<br />
· Stress<br />
· Depression<br />
· Mental Health<br />
· Substance abuse program. Measures include rehabilitation of employees and<br />
reintegration into family and workplace environment.<br />
· Financial wellness<br />
Currently under the proactive program the Unit is focusing on the following:<br />
• Stress and trauma management program (especially emergency workers). Measures<br />
such as debriefing and stress and trauma group counseling. Individual cases of nonemergency<br />
workers are also included.<br />
• Substance abuse program (include alcohol). Measures include awareness programs.<br />
• Wellness awareness programmes such as substance abuse, illnesses such as<br />
HIV/AIDS, TB, Cancer, etc. The awareness is conducted based on the statistics in<br />
the institution of certain illness, e.g. HIV/Aids.<br />
• Sports activities (bi-weekly)<br />
• Fun Walk (bi-monthly)<br />
• Wellness Day (exercising, HIV/AIDS testing, screening of illnesses etc.)<br />
Challenges facing the unit<br />
• Insufficient staff to work on EAP services<br />
• Inadequate Skills (Counseling skills)<br />
• Insufficient budget<br />
3.3.6. Occupational Health & Safety<br />
OHS deals with the identification and investigations of injuries on duty and facilitation of<br />
compensation, medical surveillance/checkups, buildings inspections and audit, risk<br />
assessment (planned task observations), provision of personal protective equipment as<br />
well as health and safety awareness programmes.
127<br />
Hiccups faced by the unit are lack of personnel and budget constraints.<br />
Challenges to be addressed by the EAP Unit<br />
· Performance and productive problems caused by personal and work related<br />
problems.<br />
· Unhealthy workforce<br />
· Unhealthy and unsafe work environment.<br />
3.3.7. Information and Communication Technology (ICT)<br />
Introduction<br />
The ICT Unit strives to be the back-bone and business driver of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> by providing and enhancing a virtual interactive organization where Information<br />
and Communication Technology are utilized to provide services to our communities.<br />
Status Quo<br />
JULY 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />
A) HARDWARE<br />
i) Out of 170 desktops eighty (80) desktops were identified as being redundant<br />
of which 16 were replaced during the 2 nd Quarter of 2012/<strong>2013</strong> financial year.<br />
ii) Out of 88 laptops 21 laptops were identified as being redundant of which 12<br />
were replaced during the 2 nd Quarter of the 2012/<strong>2013</strong> financial year.<br />
iii) Out of 6 file servers 2 file servers need to be replaced asap.<br />
B) SOFTWARE LICENSES<br />
i) Microsoft, MunAdmin, VIP, BCX, Collaborator and MunSoft licences are paid<br />
up to date.<br />
ii) License schedule was developed for 2012/<strong>2013</strong> and paid up to date by the<br />
end of the 2 nd Quarter.<br />
C) SYSTEM MAINTENANCE<br />
i) Seven (7) systems are monitored and maintained.<br />
ii) User account revision schedule is developed and in place. E-Venus & VIP<br />
User accounts were revised in June 2012 and are up for review in May <strong>2013</strong>.<br />
iii) System reports developed quarterly and service providers monitored.<br />
iv) Patch Management and Change Management Procedures developed and<br />
needs to be revised.<br />
D) SECURITY UPGRADE OF SERVER ROOMS
128<br />
i) Security gates were installed during 2 nd Quarter of 2012/<strong>2013</strong>.<br />
ii) Access registers are in place.<br />
iii) Air conditioners and environmental controls in the server rooms need to be<br />
fixed and/or upgraded.<br />
iv) Risk Management in process to acquire security cameras.<br />
E) TELEPHONE AND NETWORK INFRASTRUCURE<br />
i) VOIP network is in place in Groblersdal alone.<br />
ii) Of 29 sites there are only 9 sites included on the network (33% achievement).<br />
The project plan received from Telkom contains details of covering the 19<br />
Water Services depots and regional offices to provide to them access to all<br />
ICT systems the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is using.<br />
F) BUSINESS CONTINUITY<br />
i) Back-up Policy and Procedures in place but need to be revised and aligned to<br />
systems.<br />
ii) Back-ups are still done manually.<br />
iii) Monthly back-up reports, logs and registers in place.<br />
G) WIRELESS<br />
i) 90% of network is available at all times and downtimes kept under an hour.<br />
ii) Monthly and Quarterly reports are in place.<br />
iii) Network Monitoring Report Developed.<br />
iv) Voortrekker offices not included on the network.<br />
H) ICT AUDIT<br />
i) 64% of AG Queries attended to.<br />
ii) KPMG Audit Queries were responded to.<br />
I) RISK MANAGEMENT<br />
i) ICT Risk Register Revised and in place.<br />
J) ICT POLICY COMPLIANCE<br />
i) ICT Policy compliance report in place.<br />
K) ICT STEERING COMMITTEE<br />
i) ICT Steering Committee in place and 1 meeting already held in 2 nd Quarter.<br />
L) ICT SHARED SERVICES<br />
i) ICT Shared Services meeting scheduled to take place in 3 rd Quarter of<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong>.<br />
Challenges to be addressed by the ICT Unit
129<br />
1. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is a vast area and many residents still do not<br />
have access to basic ICT functions like e-mails and internet. To bridge the digital<br />
divide and empower the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Community, the ICT Unit needs to<br />
investigate and research on ways and means to improve this situation.<br />
2. There are a number of systems utilized for various reasons in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. Some of these systems do not fully integrate with each<br />
other which are either causing loopholes or duplication of efforts. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is therefore operating on a flat file system and systems are<br />
disintegrated.<br />
3. Various risks were identified by the Risk Unit i.e. Security Risks in the safe<br />
guarding of SDM information. These risks need to be revised and addressed as<br />
soon as possible.<br />
4. The ICT Unit received quite a number of both Internal and External Audit Queries<br />
which should be resolved to ensure proper ICT Governance is applied.<br />
5. The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> still didn’t adopt a proper ICT Framework.<br />
The ICT Framework will provide guidance for a 5 year ICT Strategy.<br />
6. The current ICT Disaster Recovery document is developed, but the infrastructure<br />
to execute the Plan is not in place. The back-ups are still being done manually<br />
and this process needs to be automated to increase reliability. Over and above<br />
that, the ICT Unit need to also secure the testing environment where back-ups,<br />
patches, upgrades and system changes can be tested before it is rolled out into<br />
the live environment.<br />
7. As stated in the Status Quo, there is quite a number of redundant hardware that<br />
needs to be replaced. Appointing a service provider for the provision and<br />
maintenance of hardware will speed up the turn-around time on ICT services.<br />
8. A proper ICT Strategy together with a proper Procurement Plan is needed to<br />
ensure that projects can be completed.<br />
9. The current staff compliment does not do justice to support the end users.<br />
Industry standards stipulate that 1 technician should serve 30 end users in a<br />
complex ICT environment and the ratio should be 1 to 50 in a normal/noncomplex<br />
environment.<br />
10. ICT expenditure is duplicated throughout the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
since each municipality is functioning on their own. Shared Services in the<br />
<strong>District</strong> needs to be revised with the proper guidance and support from<br />
COGHSTA.<br />
3.3.8. Auxiliary Services (AS)<br />
Introduction<br />
Auxiliary Services is one of the eight Corporate Services Department in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM); the main purpose of Auxiliary Services is ensure that safe storage of<br />
records, easy retrieval of records whenever the need arises, filing of records, archiving of
130<br />
information, record disposal, messenger services, and providing for photocopying and<br />
printing services.<br />
Status Quo<br />
The Current status of Registry Services Unit in SDM is that it is located at the Old Mutual<br />
Building with one store room at PIU and Budget & Treasury .Auxiliary services in SDM deals<br />
with the following. :<br />
• 4000Tender documents<br />
• 1050 Personnel files<br />
• 1500 Voucher files(Budget & Treasury)<br />
• 500 Documents are archived<br />
• 420 documents ready for disposal<br />
• Project Files in PIU<br />
• Approximately 2000 documents posted monthly through Frankling Machine<br />
The unit is also responsible for printing and photocopying, as well as providing messenger<br />
services.<br />
Some of the handicaps facing the Unit are:<br />
· Insufficient staff especially for messenger services<br />
· Insufficient office space to store records<br />
Challenges to be addressed by the AS Unit<br />
- Loss of records in the municipality<br />
- Irretraceable records<br />
- Need for production of hard-copies of documents for Councillors<br />
3.3.9. Legal Services<br />
Introduction<br />
The Legal Services Unit currently comprises of two Legal Officials responsible for Legal<br />
administration issues.<br />
Status Quo Legal Services Unit<br />
The division deals with litigation (17 court matters resolved), by-laws (two by laws has<br />
already been gazette) and legislative review updates 4 legislative review reports produced).<br />
The <strong>Municipality</strong> faces a large variety of legal issues. In order to cope with such issues, the<br />
institution has established a Panel of Attorneys for duration of two years which assists in<br />
effectively and efficiently resolving legal matters in order to resolve same. We have also a
131<br />
query register in place. The legal Services Unit also assists the institution with debt<br />
collection.<br />
Challenges to be addressed by the Legal Services Unit<br />
In terms of the Systems Act of 2000 as amended sec 75 states that a Municipal Council<br />
must adopt by-laws to effect to the implementation and enforcement of its tariff policy,<br />
subsection (2) of the same Act. By laws in terms of subsection (1) may differentiate between<br />
different categories of cases, debtors, service providers, service standards and geographical<br />
areas as long as such differentiation does not amount to unfair discrimination.<br />
The Legal Services Unit encounters challenges:<br />
· Procedure manual in place does not reflect the actual processes for performing the<br />
duties.<br />
· inadequate consultation by various departments ,consultation not done timeously<br />
within the institution which leads to unnecessary litigations and<br />
· verbal requests to attend to legal queries<br />
· No timeous notification on debt collection matters<br />
· Unavailability of records relating to debt collection<br />
· Internal departments not providing documentation proving that the public was<br />
consulted, which makes it difficult for the Legal Services Unit to provide documentary<br />
evidence to the MEC for Local Government and Housing in order to gazette same.<br />
3.3.10. Labour Relations<br />
Introduction<br />
Labour Relations Division is governed by different legislations i.e. Labour<br />
Relations Act 66 of 1995, South African Local Government Bargaining Council<br />
Main Collective Agreement, SDM Labour Relations Strategy approved by<br />
Council on 21 June 2012, Basic Conditions of Employment Act, Employment<br />
Equity Act etc.<br />
The role of Labour Relations Division is to ensure labour peace within the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
through Local Labour Forum and other forums and to investigate alleged misconduct and<br />
grievances.<br />
Status Quo<br />
Currently SDM has good relationship with organised labour. Local Labour Forum is in place.<br />
The forum has been established in terms of the Main Collective Agreement in order to deal<br />
with matters of mutual interest. LLF meets monthly and regular reports are sent to SALGA.<br />
<strong>District</strong> Labour Relations Practitioners Forum was established to address labour related
132<br />
challenges within the district. The forum meets bi monthly to deal with labour related issues.<br />
The Labour Relations Strategy approved by Council on 21 June 2012 and outlines how<br />
management and organised should engage going forward. The strategy gives rights to<br />
organised labour as per the legislations agreed upon in the SALGBC.<br />
Labour Relations Publication is issued quarterly to consciountize employees with current and<br />
burning issues in labour relation. Since 2009/2010 financial year 10 articles have been<br />
issued.<br />
Operational handicaps against the division are:<br />
· Shortage of skilled personnel<br />
· Managers reluctant to deal with labour related matters<br />
Challenges to be addressed by the Labour Relations Division<br />
• Industrial actions (Strikes)<br />
• Labour disputes<br />
• Employee Misconduct<br />
• Employee grievances<br />
Labour Relations Strategy<br />
The Labour Relations Strategy aims to maintain relationships between the<br />
employer and its employees. It deals with issues such as the following:<br />
• Discipline<br />
• Misconduct<br />
• Grievances<br />
• Collective bargaining<br />
• Strikes<br />
• Picketing<br />
• Management of labour relationship<br />
• Conflict resolution<br />
• Dispute Resolution<br />
3.3.11. Organizational Development (OD)<br />
Introduction<br />
The OD division exists in order to improve the organization’s empowerment, learning,<br />
problem solving processes through an on-going collaborative management of organizational<br />
culture, with special emphasis on the culture of the intact work teams and other team<br />
configurations utilizing consultant facilitator role, theory and technology of applied
133<br />
behavioural science including action research. In summary, the division deals with<br />
addressing transformation issues.<br />
Status Quo<br />
The organizational structure was approved by council in 2011/12 financial year. There were<br />
some major changes, the merging of the then Administration and Human Resources<br />
department to Corporate Services. The municipality has currently piloted the high level<br />
structure on the separation of powers between the executive and legislature. The placement<br />
committee and the Dispute Resolution were established to deal with confirmations and<br />
disputes concerning placement.<br />
74 positions were affected by placement, 4 had major changes and 89 employees were<br />
declared in excess but currently the number of excess employees is reduced to 43.The 4<br />
major challenges were issues of productivity and competency.<br />
Currently we are proposing for migration of fleet and facility function from Budget & Treasury<br />
to Corporate Services.<br />
The municipality was embarking on business process reengineering with the SP as a result it<br />
did not yield the desired results so the mayoral committee took the resolution to check<br />
whether the service can be terminated , currently the contract manager is busy trying to get<br />
the legal opinion regarding the matter.<br />
The OD Division is busy reviewing the organizational structure and business processes for<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> financial year equally we are going to design forms for efficiency and effectiveness<br />
of services.<br />
Challenges to be addressed by the OD Unit<br />
· Restructuring of the organization<br />
· Demotivated employees / no productivity.<br />
· No process chart for various functions are in place<br />
· Continuous diagnoses of respective departments<br />
· Unequal pay/rewards given to equal work<br />
3.3.12. Status Quo on High Level Delivery Areas in 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />
Key high level delivery<br />
areas<br />
Management of corporate<br />
services<br />
Detailed activities Status quo 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />
Management of human<br />
resource administration<br />
· Human resource<br />
administration and<br />
76 bursaries were awarded<br />
44 experiential learners<br />
accommodated
134<br />
benefits<br />
· Facilitate recruitment<br />
and selection<br />
· Coordinate policy<br />
development<br />
Manage organisational<br />
development<br />
· Process improvement<br />
· Organisational<br />
development services<br />
· Facilitate<br />
development of job<br />
descriptions<br />
· Conduct job<br />
evaluation<br />
Manage labour relations<br />
Manage auxiliary services<br />
· Render records<br />
management<br />
· Manage fleet and<br />
facilities<br />
Manage information and<br />
communication technology<br />
· Provide information<br />
and communication<br />
technology<br />
· Monitor performance<br />
of ICT infrastructure<br />
· Monitor network<br />
performance<br />
Manage human resource<br />
development<br />
· Compilation and<br />
implementation of<br />
Workplace Skills<br />
Development Plan<br />
· Coordinate training<br />
activities<br />
· Render human<br />
resource<br />
development<br />
Manage employee wellness<br />
services<br />
· Facilitate Employee<br />
36 interns accommodated<br />
46 learnership facilitated<br />
178 employees on<br />
Recognition of Prior Learning<br />
educational programme<br />
288 safety inspections and<br />
corrective measures<br />
undertaken<br />
66 safety awareness<br />
campaigns conducted<br />
28 employee wellness<br />
campaigns conducted<br />
50% of HR Plan<br />
implemented<br />
30 policies and procedures<br />
developed<br />
Employee retention strategy<br />
in place<br />
Employment Equity Plan in<br />
place<br />
64 ICT backups done<br />
7 ICT maintenance reviews<br />
done<br />
9 sites included in the ICT<br />
network<br />
100% of legal cases<br />
attended<br />
4 legislative review updates<br />
done<br />
File plan in place<br />
920 files archived<br />
10% of personnel files<br />
audited and updated
135<br />
Performance management<br />
Assistance<br />
Programmes<br />
· Effective and efficient<br />
management of<br />
workplace hazards<br />
Manage legal services<br />
· Provide legal advice<br />
to council and<br />
administration<br />
· Provide executive<br />
support<br />
Performance Planning<br />
· SDBIP (Service<br />
Delivery and budget<br />
implementation plan)<br />
· Employment<br />
contracts and<br />
Performance<br />
agreements<br />
Performance Implementation<br />
· Section 56 updates to<br />
COGHSTA<br />
· Revised SDBIP<br />
Monthly reporting<br />
· Performance<br />
management forums<br />
Performance <strong>Review</strong><br />
· Annual report<br />
· Monthly, quarterly<br />
and annual<br />
performance reports<br />
· Performance<br />
Lekgotla<br />
· Performance<br />
Appraisals<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> SDBIP developed<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> Employment<br />
contracts for all section 56<br />
Managers and performance<br />
agreements concluded<br />
Monthly section 56 updates<br />
to COGHSTA done<br />
Performance Monthly<br />
reporting for <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>2013</strong> done<br />
Annual report for 2011/2012<br />
compiled and submitted to<br />
council<br />
Performance Lekgotla for all<br />
four quarters conducted<br />
Performance appraisals for<br />
2011/2012 done
136<br />
3.4. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE<br />
DEVELOPMENT<br />
Introduction<br />
The information on analysis of basic service delivery was taken from variety of<br />
sources including: Statistics SA, communities within the SDM (through<br />
community consultation), internal departmental inputs, and other spheres of<br />
government.<br />
3.4.1. Water<br />
Introduction<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is both a Water Service Authority (WSA) and Water Service<br />
Provider (WSP). Its 605 villages are supplied with water from 43 schemes and sub-schemes.<br />
Water scarcity is an issue of major concern in the district; however, ordinary residence often<br />
feels these stresses particularly acutely during low rainfall.<br />
The delivery of water in the <strong>District</strong> remains a challenge; however, in the first five years of<br />
the SDM’s existence. The total number of households without access to clean water has<br />
dropped from 35, 9% o 17, and 5%. The overall reduction in the number of households<br />
receiving water below prescribed minimum standard is 42%. The number of households who<br />
receive water at minimum standards of service and above has increased by an impressive<br />
52.3%. There are 4% of those who pay rent particularly in Urban Households.<br />
The tables below outlines the water services situation found in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households,<br />
schools and clinics. The image generated is that the <strong>District</strong> experiences more below RDP<br />
standards services than they do above RDP standards services.<br />
The <strong>District</strong> is faced with a mammoth responsibility of providing water and sanitation to many<br />
villages that depended on boreholes and rivers for the past years. Many of these boreholes<br />
have dried up while river water is not good for human consumption.<br />
Status Quo<br />
Table 28: Domestic water services with infrastructure at or above RDP levels<br />
SDM EPHMLM EMLM MLM FLM GTM<br />
Total Number of hh <strong>23</strong>3067.59 28857 52936 58991 20731 61552<br />
(Dec. ’08)<br />
Total number of hh <strong>14</strong>9902.00 26677 31260 29663 18035 44267<br />
served<br />
Percentage HH 67% 92% 59% 50% 87% 71%<br />
Served
137<br />
Source: Technical Services SDM<br />
The situation is no less bleak for schools and clinics within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. This obviously has<br />
significant repercussions in social terms, and may lead to an unnecessary number of<br />
illnesses in school children. There are still schools in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (31%) that receive below<br />
RDP standards water services as can be seen in the table below.<br />
Table 29: Water Services in Schools<br />
Above RDP Below RDP Total Schools % Above RDP % Below RDP<br />
402 335 737 55% 45%<br />
Source: SDM/DWAE Nis<br />
Similarly, all of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> registered clinics receive services above RDP standards as<br />
confirmed with DWAE.<br />
Table 30: Water Services in Clinics<br />
Above RDP Below RDP Total Schools % Above RDP % Below RDP<br />
24 41 65 37% 63%<br />
Source: SDM/DWAE Nis<br />
Table 31: <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Households that pay for water<br />
Percentage<br />
No, free from government 56,2<br />
Yes, for usage 18,1<br />
No, but not free from Government <strong>14</strong>,1<br />
Yes, household pays a fixed monthly amount 7,5<br />
Do not know 4<br />
Total 100<br />
Source: DoA and FIVIMS (2007a) – Poor quality dwellings can help to identify pockets of food insecurities<br />
In addition to domestic water consumption, the mining and agricultural sectors also consume<br />
substantial amount of water in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />
<strong>District</strong> Initiatives<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has prepared a Water Services Development Plan (WSDP) that<br />
was adopted in 2005 and updated annually. The WSDP is currently being implemented and<br />
will be reviewed on yearly basis. The <strong>District</strong> has also finalized its section 78 process and is<br />
presently implementing the outcomes of that exercise. The establishment of Water Service<br />
Department and the transfer of DWAE staff to the <strong>District</strong> have been completed.<br />
The raising of Flag Boshielo Dam by five meters has been completed by DWAE. Funds have<br />
been allocated to construct a new dam (De Hoop Dam) to increase the <strong>District</strong>’s capacity to<br />
provide water to its communities. These two dams will improve the state of water provision in
138<br />
the <strong>District</strong> and these will eventually tourism and other development opportunities in the<br />
area.<br />
The <strong>District</strong> has developed a Community Water Supplies Master Plan. This enables the<br />
<strong>District</strong> and its implementing agents to achieve its WSDP objectives. The intention is also to<br />
investigate alternative technical options for supplying specific areas with water, and to<br />
ensure coordination and implementation of water supply infrastructure. Early findings of<br />
these studies reveal that groundwater is a major water resource for most <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
households – and will continue to do so in the future. 92% of households in Tubatse, 87% in<br />
Fetakgomo and 16% in Ephraim Mogale are solely reliant on groundwater. The following<br />
water sources are found in SDM:<br />
· Ground water<br />
· Wells<br />
· Rivers<br />
· Pools<br />
· Dams e.g. Flag Boshielo, etc.<br />
Free Basic Water<br />
Most <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households can be defined as poor indigent-where the total income is<br />
below R1, 500 per month. At present, approximately 79% of the households in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
fall into this category. These are the households to which Free Basic Water (FBW) must be<br />
supplied and to whom the Equitable Share subsidy applies.<br />
Water Backlog<br />
Table 32: Water Backlog A<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> Households Backlog % Backlog<br />
Fetakgomo 29 570 16 263 56%<br />
Ephraim Mogale 32 304 16 576 62%<br />
Greater Tubatse 66 611 13 759 43%<br />
Makhuduthamaga 56 642 32 899 64%<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 52 263 25 586 64%<br />
Total / <strong>District</strong> <strong>23</strong>7 390 105 083 57%<br />
Source: STATS SA – 2007 Community Survey<br />
There is a slight difference between the STATSSA information on water backlog above and<br />
the WSDP information in Table 54 below. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the Water<br />
Services authority to contact a verification process to test the accuracy of the information.<br />
The huge backlog indicated above shows it is unlikely that the SDM will meet the national<br />
targets.<br />
Table 33: Water Backlog B
139<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> Households Backlog % Backlog<br />
Fetakgomo 29 570 <strong>14</strong> 190 56%<br />
Ephraim Mogale 32 304 1<strong>14</strong>74 62%<br />
Greater Tubatse 66 611 21 529 43%<br />
Makhuduthamaga 56 642 32 899 64%<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 52 263 22494 64%<br />
Total / <strong>District</strong> <strong>23</strong>7 390 102 586 57%<br />
Source: SDM (2009) – Water Services Development Plan<br />
Access to piped water<br />
At least 25% of the households in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> do not have access to<br />
piped water which represents 65 530 households. 75% of the households in the district do<br />
have access to piped water in the yard or through communal tap which represents 198 272<br />
households in the district. The majority of households who do not have access to piped<br />
water are found in Elias Motsoaledi and Greater Tubatse as well as Makhuduthamaga. This<br />
means that the municipality must progressively focus delivery of water infrastructure in the<br />
three municipalities where possible.<br />
Table 34: Access to piped water<br />
Access to piped water inside<br />
dwelling/yard<br />
Access to piped water on<br />
communal stand<br />
No access to piped water<br />
1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />
Ephraim Mogale 7 909 9 980 22 759 4 257 6 063 4 343 7 385 8 <strong>14</strong>6 5 181<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 10 510 12 562 28 295 13 205 <strong>14</strong> 176 11 901 18 449 18 741 20 056<br />
Makhuduthamaga 8 081 5 701 20 817 <strong>14</strong> 0<strong>23</strong> 18 510 26 984 27 400 28 767 17 416<br />
Fetakgomo 2 193 2 362 8 154 8 336 8 700 12 059 6 722 7 822 2 638<br />
Greater Tubatse 5 073 9 176 25 847 17 639 24 188 37 113 19 389 20 393 20 <strong>23</strong>9<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 33 766 39 779 105 872 57 460 71 636 92 400 79 345 83 870 65 530<br />
Source: Census (2011)
<strong>14</strong>0<br />
SDM WARD COMMITTEES <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Figure 22: Water supply energy source<br />
Energy source water supply<br />
It appears from the figure above that there are many villages that are using electric motors<br />
as energy source for water supply (375 villages). Most of the villages are found in<br />
Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (117); followed by Greater Tubatse (109); Elias<br />
Motsoaledi (64); Fetakgomo (45) and Ephraim Mogale (40).<br />
There are also villages that are still using Diesel Engines as the energy source of water<br />
supply. The highest number is recorded in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (69);<br />
Makhuduthamaga (32); Fetakgomo (19); Elias Motsoaledi (19); and finally Ephraim Mogale<br />
(3).<br />
This means there are 375 electric motors compared to 136 diesel engines in the district as<br />
indicated. The Implication is that with regard to operations and maintenance programme,<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should make provision for more spare parts to service<br />
electric motors whilst stabilising in areas where there are diesel engines. There is a therefore<br />
a need to gradually move towards providing more electric motors as a long term strategy.<br />
Many villages no longer prefer diesel engines as it is difficult to maintain.<br />
Figure <strong>23</strong>: Frequency of water supply by village
<strong>14</strong>1<br />
SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
At least 41% (86) of the villages in the district reported that there is no water supply in their<br />
area and are found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. This is followed by 29% (61) of<br />
the villages that are located in Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 15 %( 32) in<br />
Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 11 %( 22) in Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> and finally<br />
4% (9) are found in Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. These villages recorded that there is<br />
no water supply at all in their areas making it a total of 210 villages.<br />
415 villages reported that although there was water supply, it was irregular. This implies that<br />
water was available in certain periods and sometimes once or three times a week. 112<br />
villages in Makhuduthamaga and similarly (112) in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
reported that the water supply was sporadic.<br />
It can be observed that within the district as a whole, only 127 villages reported that the<br />
water supply was regular. 43 villages are found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 40<br />
villages in Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 21 villages in Elias Motsoaledi Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong>; 17 in Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> and finally 6 villages in Fetakgomo<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
It appears that 542 villages are being supplied with piped water although only 127 (17%) are<br />
satisfied with the supply compared to 415 (55%) that recorded water supply as irregularly<br />
supplied and 210 (28%) with no supply at all. In total 72% of the villages in the district<br />
municipality are being provided with piped water (542 villages).<br />
The implications is that the district municipality needs to deal with the areas where there is<br />
no supply at all but also focus on making sure that there is regularity of supply in areas<br />
where the supply is sporadic.
<strong>14</strong>2<br />
The includes but not limited to assessing the causes of problems where supply is sporadic<br />
and making sure that there is extension and roll out of water supply in areas where there is<br />
lack of supply.<br />
Figure 24: Pump operator availability by village<br />
SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
At least 366 (61%) of the villages in the district recorded that they have pump operators for<br />
operation of water sources (diesel engines and/or electric motors). <strong>23</strong>1 (39%) villages<br />
indicated that they do not have pump operators. Most respondents indicated that the nature<br />
of the pump operators varies; there are those that have been employed by the district and<br />
those that are volunteering in the communities. The highest numbers of pump operators are<br />
found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (129); followed by Makhuduthamaga Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> (117); Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (51); Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
(39); and Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (30).<br />
The implication is that the municipality must rationalise the pump operators by verifying<br />
those that are still on the municipal payroll and those that are volunteering. It will be best to<br />
also map the location of these operators with the clear intention of consolidating villages on<br />
a linear location so that instead of allocating one operator per machine, there could be one<br />
operator being responsible for multiple villages.<br />
It is also questionable whether the municipality is deriving value for money out of the these<br />
operators if one compares the number of available operators as opposed to regularity of<br />
water supply in the villages.<br />
Figure 25: Source of water supply by village
<strong>14</strong>3<br />
SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Most of the villages within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> derive their water from Municipal<br />
system as a source. There are <strong>23</strong>9 villages within the entire district that use the municipal<br />
system. 59 villages are found in Makhuduthamaga; Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 58;<br />
Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 50; Fetakgomo 44 and finally 28 in Greater Tubatse<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
It is quite astonishing that Greater Tubatse <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest number of villages<br />
that still relies on boreholes as water source. <strong>14</strong>0 villages were recorded in Greater Tubatse<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong> as those that still rely on boreholes. Only 18 villages in the district were<br />
recorded as using water tankers for water supply. 155 villages indicated that they still make<br />
use of the river as source of water. These villages are mostly found in Greater Tubatse Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> (47) and Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (48) followed by Fetakgomo Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> (28); Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (26) and Ephraim Mogale Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> (6).<br />
In general 336 (43%) of the villages still rely on boreholes; <strong>23</strong>9 (31%) rely on the municipal<br />
system; 155 (20%) make use of the river; 18 (2%) relies on water tankers and remainder<br />
35(4%) make use of other methods. This is the case in an area in Praktiseer where they<br />
indicated that there is no water supply and they cross the road to the nearest settlement to<br />
fetch water. Others rely on water vendors as reliable water supply.<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> must put in place processes to ensure that reliance on<br />
boreholes is reduced as the area is very dry. There is also a need to drastically reduce water<br />
tankers not only because they are costly but for a mere fact that the water quality is<br />
minimised by transportation.
<strong>14</strong>4<br />
Figure 26: Standard of water supply by village<br />
SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
The majority of villages within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> derive their water from<br />
communal water systems. 139 villages are found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 113<br />
in Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 72 in Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 56 in Elias<br />
Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> with the remainder (24) in Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
In total 404 villages derive their water from communal water systems.<br />
The data indicates that 132 villages within the district obtain water from yard connections.<br />
These households have the highest level of service compared to the rest. The majority of<br />
villages are found in Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (37); followed by Elias Motsoaledi<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (34); Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (26); Greater Tubatse Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> (25) and finally Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (10).<br />
224 households indicated that they obtain their water from other systems other than yard<br />
and communal water systems. This could include but no limited to the following; water<br />
vendors, river and water tankers.<br />
The implication is that many villagers in the district still travel long distances in order to<br />
obtain water. There is a need to intensify a programme of yard connections. Secondly, the<br />
district must take advantage of the areas where there are yard connections for<br />
implementation of cost recovery.<br />
Challenges<br />
· No source in other areas<br />
· Budgetary constraints<br />
· Some of the boreholes are contaminated<br />
· The stealing of both electric and diesel engine pumps<br />
· Breakdown of machines, illegal connections and extensions of settlements.
<strong>14</strong>5<br />
3.4.2. Sanitation<br />
Introduction<br />
The provision of sanitation in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> also faces considerable challenges at present.<br />
The situation is more of a concern that it was the cases with water. Only 22% of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
households receive above RDP standards sanitation services. The sanitation backlog is<br />
primarily within the rural villages, comprising 78% of households without adequate<br />
sanitation. The SDM will not be able to meet the national targets are stipulated by MDG.<br />
The SDM has different households that use different types of toilet facilities. Almost all towns<br />
in the <strong>District</strong> use flushing toilets while in the rural areas there are few households that use<br />
flushing toilets. The rest of the population in the rural areas of the <strong>District</strong> use pit latrines.<br />
Status Quo<br />
Table 35: Breakdown of Sanitation Backlog per Local <strong>Municipality</strong> A<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong> Households Backlog<br />
Fetakgomo 29 570 11 768<br />
Greater Ephraim Mogale 32 304 16 576<br />
Greater Tubatse 66 611 25 798<br />
Makhuduthamaga 56 642 38 034<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 52 263 31 763<br />
Total (<strong>District</strong>) <strong>23</strong>7 390 1<strong>23</strong> 939<br />
Source: STATS SA – 2007 Community Survey<br />
There is a slight difference between the STATSSA information on sanitation backlog above<br />
and the WSDP information below. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the Water Services<br />
Authority to contact a verification process to test the accuracy of the information.<br />
Table 36: Breakdown of sanitation backlog per local municipality B<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong> Household Backlog<br />
Fetakgomo 29 570 25 895<br />
Ephraim Mogale 32 304 29 169<br />
Greater Tubatse 66 611 65 690<br />
Makhuduthamaga 56 642 51271<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 52 263 38 922<br />
Total (<strong>District</strong>) <strong>23</strong>7 390 211 797<br />
Source: SDM WSDP<br />
In addition, a slight majority of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> schools (53%) receive RDP standard sanitation<br />
services, which is a better picture than that for households.
<strong>14</strong>6<br />
Table 37: School Sanitation<br />
Above RDP Below RDP Total Clinics % Above RDP % Below RDP<br />
698 39 737 95% 5%<br />
Source: SDM (2005) Water Services Development Plan<br />
The situation is not the same for clinics in the area, however, with as much as 63% receiving<br />
below RDP Standards services.<br />
Table 38: Clinic Sanitation<br />
Above RDP Below RDP Total Clinics % Above RDP % Below RDP<br />
24 41 65 37% 63%<br />
Source: SDM (2005) Water Services Development Plan<br />
Type of sanitation<br />
Access to sanitation remains a challenge in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. In 2011,<br />
22 687 households have access to either flush/chemical toilet system. Majority of these<br />
households are located in Greater Tubatse and Elias Motsoaledi. Greater Tubatse local<br />
municipality still scores higher in terms of the number of households that do not have access<br />
to toilets standing at 5 661. Pit toilets are still the main source of sanitation in the district.<br />
Measures need to be taken in order to reduce the number of pit toilets as they may lead to<br />
ground water pollution whilst many households are relying on it for daily consumption.<br />
Table 39: Sanitation Type<br />
MUNICIPALITY Flush/chemical toilets Pit toilets Bucket No toilets<br />
1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 200<br />
1<br />
201<br />
1<br />
1996 2001 2011<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Makhuduthama<br />
ga<br />
1 708 3 758 4 067 15 789 17 162 25 328 151 121 611 1 892 3 <strong>14</strong>7 1 677<br />
2 883 3 786 7 792 36 377 38 802 47 632 274 375 460 2 672 2 516 2 680<br />
1 274 2 176 3 009 38 532 41 918 58 561 188 372 224 9 545 8 512 2 552<br />
Fetakgomo 102 724 794 10 505 13 111 20 827 85 106 55 9 545 8 512 2 552<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
1 585 4 262 7 026 26 559 35 203 67 872 182 339 1<br />
259<br />
13 825 13 952 5 661<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 7 552 <strong>14</strong><br />
706<br />
22<br />
687<br />
127 762 <strong>14</strong>6<br />
196<br />
220<br />
221<br />
881 1<br />
313<br />
2<br />
609<br />
34 528 33 070 13 510<br />
Source: Census 2011<br />
Figure 27: Type of sanitation by village
<strong>14</strong>7<br />
SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
The graph above illustrates that at least 75% (592) of the villages in the district are still using<br />
pit latrines as the sanitation system. The highest number has been recorded in Greater<br />
Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (184); followed by Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (159);<br />
Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (122); Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (84) and lastly<br />
Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (43). This is also compared to 9% (70) of the villages that<br />
are using Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines (VIP’s).<br />
Only 2% (17) of the villages/suburbs are making use of sewer borne sanitation systems. This<br />
is mainly in the urban areas of the district such as existing towns and townships. Greater<br />
Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has recorded the highest number of villages/suburbs that are<br />
using sewer (7); followed by Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (5); Ephraim Mogale Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> (4); Makhuduthamaga (1). Only Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is the only one<br />
that does not have a settlement that is using sewer system. Finally, <strong>14</strong>% (110) villages<br />
indicated that they are using other forms of sanitations which have not been indicated.<br />
This ranges from villages that still rely on bushes for sanitation and those that rely on their<br />
neighbours for assistance.<br />
The implications from the above are that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> needs to develop<br />
and implement a programme that will improve sanitation access throughout the entire<br />
district.<br />
There is also a need to develop standards regarding sanitation supply in the district in line<br />
with required standards. More work needs to be done to ensure that households in the<br />
district gravitate from Pit Latrines towards safer sanitation options even if it is not sewer<br />
borne sanitation. There are varieties of technologies that are available to deal with sanitation<br />
challenges.
<strong>14</strong>8<br />
Figure 28: Sanitation programme implemented by government by village<br />
SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
The chart above indicates that 84% (613) of the villages recorded that there was no<br />
sanitation programme implemented in their area by government or other state organ. Only<br />
16% (116) of the villages indicated that there was some sanitation programme implemented<br />
by government. Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest number of villages that<br />
still require sanitation intervention (199); followed by Makhuduthamaga (153); Elias<br />
Motsoaledi (132); Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (76) and finally Ephraim Mogale Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> (53).<br />
Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> benefitted immensely from government sanitation<br />
programmes where 31 villages were recorded; followed by Fetakgomo (<strong>23</strong>); Elias Motsoaledi<br />
and Makhuduthamaga (22) and finally Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (18).<br />
The implications from the above findings are that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should<br />
develop a comprehensive programme to deal with access to sanitation in the district. It is<br />
also important to explore sanitation measures especially for the rural areas in the district.<br />
Challenges:<br />
· Budgetary constraints<br />
· Mountain area<br />
3.4.3. Refuse removal<br />
Waste removal is being provided in urban centres like Marble Hall, Groblersdal and<br />
Burgersfort. Permitted landfill sites are Marble Hall, Burgersfort, Jane Furse and recently<br />
(Malogeng and Mphanama) in Fetakgomo. The waste disposal and collection has just
<strong>14</strong>9<br />
started in some parts of Makhuduthamaga. There are some villages that conduct their own<br />
illegal dumping sites which could be a potential environmental and health hazard.<br />
In many municipalities in South Africa, refuse removal is seen as a trading service. That is,<br />
municipalities provide this service and only recover the cost of providing the service without<br />
any profit. The rural nature of the district makes it impossible for the roll out of the sewer<br />
borne sanitation notwithstanding the fact that most of the rural households are currently not<br />
paying for municipal services. In 2011, <strong>23</strong> 213 households have access to refuse removal<br />
that is undertaken by local authorities. The majority of these households are found in Greater<br />
Tubatse, followed by Elias Motsoaledi and Fetakgomo. Makhuduthamaga has the least<br />
number of households that are receiving refuse removal service.<br />
The strategy implication is that for refuse removal work, it must be provided in tandem with<br />
other services like water, sanitation and electricity so that an individual household is billed for<br />
the entire services provision.<br />
Table 40: Access to Refuse Removal<br />
Removed by local<br />
authority/private company<br />
Communal refuse<br />
No rubbish disposal<br />
1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />
Ephraim Mogale 2 184 3 173 3 726 15 490 17 311 <strong>23</strong> 829 1 663 3 706 4 356<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 4 136 3 448 6 527 31 805 34 003 44 517 5 765 8 027 8 504<br />
Makhuduthamaga 3 073 463 1 639 39 3<strong>23</strong> 46 992 58 636 6 572 5 5<strong>23</strong> 4 631<br />
Fetakgomo 154 428 4 216 12 133 <strong>14</strong> 621 16 417 4 801 3 835 2 121<br />
Greater Tubatse 743 3 946 7 105 26 576 35 241 60 892 <strong>14</strong> 384 <strong>14</strong> 569 <strong>14</strong> 794<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 10 290 11 458 <strong>23</strong> 213 125 328 <strong>14</strong>8 167 204 290 33 185 35 660 34 406<br />
Source: Census 2011<br />
Figure29: Refuse removal according to villages
150<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Most of the areas in the district are still rural in nature. 94% (694) of the villages recorded<br />
that they are not receiving refuse removal services from the municipality. This compares to<br />
6% (42) of the villages/suburbs that recorded that they are receiving refuse removal from the<br />
municipality. Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest number of villages that recorded<br />
that they are receiving municipal refuse removal service (22) followed by Elias Motsoaledi<br />
(8); Greater Tubatse (7); Ephraim Mogale (3) and Makhuduthamaga (2).<br />
3.4.4. Electricity<br />
Introduction<br />
Currently, Eskom provides electricity in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Area. Even though Eskom is the<br />
main provider of electricity, the <strong>District</strong> and the Local Municipalities do sometimes implement<br />
electrification projects to assist in reducing backlogs. Ephraim Mogale <strong>Municipality</strong> provides<br />
electricity for its Marble Hall Town while Elias Motsoaledi provides electricity to both<br />
Groblersdal Town and Roosenekal. Fetakgomo, Makhuduthamaga and Greater Tubatse<br />
Local Municipalities are not licensed to supply electricity.<br />
The electrification backlog is currently estimated at 37 124 households. Given the current<br />
electricity capacity challenges and lack of resources, it is unlikely that these backlogs will be<br />
eliminated in time to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) and national targets for<br />
electricity in 20<strong>14</strong>.<br />
Table 41: Electricity backlog per municipality<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Backlogs (Household)<br />
Fetakgomo 1 937<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 5 349
151<br />
Ephraim Mogale 3 357<br />
Makhuduthamaga 6 266<br />
Greater Tubatse 20 215<br />
SDM 37 124<br />
Source: Census 2011<br />
Free Basic Electricity<br />
Most <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households can be defined as poor indigent-where the total income is<br />
below R1, 500 per month. At present, approximately 79% of the households in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
fall into this category. These are the households to which Free Basic Electricity (FBE) must<br />
be supplied and to whom the Equitable Share subsidy applies.<br />
Table 42: Households receiving free electricity in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> Free Basic Electricity %<br />
Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 1039 4.503<br />
Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 2886 12.507<br />
Ephraim Mogale <strong>Municipality</strong> <strong>23</strong>90 10.358<br />
Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 8503 36.849<br />
Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 8257 35.783<br />
Total <strong>23</strong>075 100<br />
Source: DoA and FIVIMS (2007a)<br />
The provision of electricity in most of the rural villages has assisted many households to use<br />
it for lighting. Statistics has shown that Ephraim Mogale <strong>Municipality</strong> has been provided with<br />
lightning in almost all its rural villages. There is still a need to provide electricity for lighting in<br />
other municipalities like Fetakgomo, Makhuduthamaga, Tubatse and Elias Motsoaledi.<br />
Larger percentages of villages in the rural areas do not use energy for cooking. They still<br />
depend on the collection of fire wood for cooking. Smaller percentage of people use energy<br />
for cooking. It is only in towns where almost all people use energy for cooking. Perhaps, 0,<br />
1% of people use coal for cooking if there are such people. There are also few people who<br />
use other sources of energy for cooking like gas.<br />
Fire wood remains a dominant energy source used in rural villages for heating. It should also<br />
be indicated that even in towns, fire wood is used by some for heating. Smaller percentage<br />
of people in towns uses electricity for heating.<br />
Energy for lighting, heating and cooking<br />
Access to electricity has tremendously improved from 1996 compared to 2011. 226 677<br />
households in the district have access to electricity which represents 86% of the total<br />
households in the district. Only <strong>14</strong>% of the households in the district do not have access to<br />
electricity representing 37 124 households. Notwithstanding the above, there are settlements
152<br />
that have grown which will also require post electrification connections. Greater Tubatse and<br />
Makhuduthamaga municipalities have the highest number of households that still require<br />
electrification. Out of these households that require electrification, 69 Villages are in Greater<br />
Tubatse and 32 in Elias Motsoaledi.<br />
Table 43: Energy for lighting, heating and cooking<br />
Lighting Cooking Heating<br />
1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />
Ephraim Mogale 10 697 19 938 28 927 4 511 6 381 15 086 4 219 8 455 13 341<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 29 505 38 906 54 902 10 495 10 398 37 830 9 624 11 402 30 433<br />
Makhuduthamaga 12 368 32 884 58 951 5 058 8 967 32 293 4 615 8 951 <strong>23</strong> 716<br />
Fetakgomo 2 630 7 373 20 9<strong>14</strong> 1 562 3 344 13 202 1 454 3 101 11 033<br />
Greater Tubatse 8 750 25 072 62 984 3 677 8 688 45 374 3 537 9 057 32 689<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 63 950 124 173 226 677 25 303 37 778 <strong>14</strong>3 786 <strong>23</strong> 449 40 966 111 212<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
Figure 30: Electricity supply<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
The above chart illustrates that 84% (601) of the villages do have access to electricity<br />
compared to 16% (1<strong>14</strong>) that do not have access. The majority of the villages that do not<br />
have access to electricity are found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (69); Elias<br />
Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (32); Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (6); Makhuduthamaga<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (5) and finally Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (2).
153<br />
Figure 31: Electricity post connections<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
It appears that 77% (533) villages recorded that they require electricity post connections<br />
compared to <strong>23</strong>% (155) which recorded that there are no post connections needed. Greater<br />
Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest number of post connections required (154<br />
villages) followed by Makhuduthamaga (<strong>14</strong>8 villages); Elias Motsoaledi (93); Fetakgomo (89)<br />
and Ephraim Mogale (49).<br />
It appears that many villages in the district do have access to electricity. There is a need to<br />
engage with Eskom on the remainder of the villages that still require electricity connections.<br />
There has also been an expansion of existing settlements which has given rise to the<br />
increased need for post connections. Therefore the district has to consolidate information for<br />
new connections and post connections for presentation to Eskom.<br />
Challenges:<br />
· Authority over electricity<br />
· Eskom has no capacity<br />
· Illegal connections<br />
· New extensions of residential sites for post connectors<br />
· Budgetary constrains<br />
3.4.5. Cemeteries
154<br />
Figure 32: Access to cemeteries<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Most of the villages in the district do have access to cemeteries. 78% (530) villages/suburbs<br />
recorded that they have access to cemeteries compared to 22% (152) villages/suburbs that<br />
recorded that they have no access to cemeteries. Some of the explanations given are that<br />
some villages will bury their dead in other villages where cemeteries are available.<br />
The Majority of villages where there is absence of cemeteries are found in Greater Tubatse<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (68) followed by Elias Motsoaledi (46); Makhuduthamaga (19); Ephraim<br />
Mogale (10) and Fetakgomo (9).<br />
3.4.6. Housing<br />
Introduction<br />
The government has made significant strides towards progressively fulfilling its constitutional<br />
obligation of ensuring that every South African has access to permanent housing that<br />
provides secure tenure, privacy, protection from the elements, and access to basic services.<br />
The national housing programme is not just about building houses but also about<br />
transforming our cities and towns and building cohesive and non-racial communities. In<br />
order to contribute to the end of apartheid spatial arrangements, government will roll out<br />
housing programme closer to places of work and amenities.
155<br />
The government must continue to increase access to secure and decent housing for all<br />
through its newly adopted “Breaking New Ground” Strategy. Most <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> houses are<br />
currently cement or brick homes.<br />
Status Quo<br />
The table below provides an overview of the types of dwelling found in the area.<br />
Table 44: Typology of houses in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Building Materials<br />
Percentage of Households<br />
Cement block and concrete walls 63.6<br />
Brick walls 19.1<br />
Mud 7.3<br />
Mud and Cement 4.8<br />
Corrugated iron/zinc 4.7<br />
Corrugated iron/zinc roofs 95.1<br />
Tiled roofs 3<br />
Roofs – other material 1.9<br />
Source: DoA and FIVIMS (2007 a). Poor quality dwellings can help to identify pockets of food insecurity<br />
The vast majority of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households state that they are their own and have fully<br />
paid off their own dwellings (DoA and FIVIMS, 2007a). The different dwelling types found in<br />
the area are set out in the table below.<br />
Table 45: Dwelling types as a % of Households<br />
Types of Dwelling<br />
EMLM (%) Fetakgo Makhudut Ephraim Tubats<br />
mo LM hamaga Mogale e (%)<br />
(%) LM (%) LM (%)<br />
House or brick structure on a 73.4 79.1 75.2 73.3 69.6<br />
separate stand or yard<br />
Traditional dwelling/hut 15.2 <strong>14</strong>.3 16.6 15.8 18.4<br />
Flat/Town<br />
house/cluster 1.8 0.4 0.8 1.7 1.1<br />
house/semi-detached<br />
House/flat/room in backyard 2.4 1.0 2.2 3.2 1.0<br />
Informal dwelling/shack/backyard 5.2 4.1 44.5 4.9 8.9<br />
shack<br />
Other 1.9 1.1 0.6 1.1 1.0<br />
Source: Adapted from Census 2001 data, reproduced in SEI (2006). Adapting to climate, water and health<br />
stressors: insights from <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>, South Africa<br />
As is evident from the table above, most houses in the area are formalized structures on<br />
separate stands. There are also a reasonable number of traditional huts in the area. On<br />
average, these traditional dwellings make up roughly 15% of households in the <strong>District</strong>. The
156<br />
largest number of informal and shack dwellings are found in Makhuduthamaga, probably<br />
because of the presence of the major urban conurbation, Jane Furse, in that municipality.<br />
Table 46: Housing Backlog<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Backlog<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 5 010<br />
Fetakgomo 3 484<br />
Tubatse 1 112<br />
Ephraim Mogale 8 195<br />
Makhuduthamaga 13 250<br />
SDM 30 813<br />
Source: <strong>Municipality</strong> <strong>IDP</strong> Housing Chapter Jan 09<br />
The provision of new housing is still a challenge not only in the district but the whole<br />
Limpopo province. The Multi Year Housing Plan developed by the Department of Local<br />
Government and Housing (DLGH) has identified challenges which are being faced by the<br />
department and municipalities’, resulting in poor delivery of houses to beneficiaries.<br />
This plan is aimed at addressing some of the identified key challenges which hamper<br />
housing delivery. The department carries the responsibility of providing housing in the<br />
province whereas municipalities are responsible for compiling housing waiting lists. In<br />
2006/07, a total number of 2450 units were planned to be constructed within the district.<br />
The following table indicates housing projects for the entire district since 2003:<br />
Table 47: Housing projects in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong> Financial Year<br />
2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2010/11<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 300 - 400 500 200 500<br />
Fetakgomo 300 100 350 - 300 300<br />
Makhuduthamaga - 200 600 - 300 350<br />
Ephraim Mogale - - 100 - 100 700<br />
Tubatse 200 - 1000 - 300 900<br />
Totals 800 300 2 450 500 1 200 2 750<br />
Source: Draft Limpopo Multi –year Provincial Housing Development plan (2007)<br />
Most projects implemented over the years mentioned in the above table were never<br />
completed by developers. However, the department of Local Government and Housing is<br />
addressing blocked projects to meet NHBRC standards. The department is liaising with the<br />
local municipalities within the district regarding progress and issues relating to blocked.<br />
According to the information acquired from the DLGH, there are a total number of 4207<br />
blocked RDP housing in the district and 1787 of them are in the process of being unblocked.
157<br />
Figure 33: Government Housing Programme (RDP Housing)<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Since 1994, there has been progress regarding low cost housing delivery in the villages<br />
although not all have been reached so far. 521 villages indicated that there has been<br />
housing delivery in their area compared to 182 that recorded that they have not seen any<br />
low cost housing delivery in their area. The district municipality and its locals must work with<br />
the Provincial Housing Department to deal with housing demand issues as well as directing<br />
housing delivery in line with sustainable human settlements practices.<br />
Challenges<br />
· Untraceable beneficiaries<br />
· Beneficiaries whose livelihood has improved<br />
· Beneficiaries who are not aware that they have benefited because wrong people<br />
have unlawfully benefited on their behalf<br />
· Provision of houses to the needy households<br />
· Eradication of blocked housing projects in municipalities.
158<br />
3.4.7. Telecommunication<br />
Telephone facility remains a challenge in the SDM’s vicinity. It is commendable that many<br />
villages in the <strong>District</strong> have access to the use of telephone and cell phones but there are<br />
these other villages where there is totally no reception for both telephones and cell phones.<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> population experiences a clear cut from the international communities due to<br />
lack of Information Communication Technology (ICT). The State of the Province report that<br />
was presented in 2005 has shown that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> was still lagging behind in comparative<br />
terms with the other <strong>District</strong>s in the province. The population fails to take the advantage of<br />
the ever-expanding internet and e-mail telecommunication facilities especially for<br />
educational and business opportunities. This is potentially an important pathway to economic<br />
growth in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
In addition, there are still villages in the <strong>District</strong> that cannot get proper signals for radios and<br />
televisions because of their geographic location. This is especially true of the mountainous<br />
villages like Tswereng. Mahlabeng, Rostok, Mooihoek, India, Ga-Makopa, Pelangwe,<br />
Phahlamanoge, Tjate, Kgautswane, etc.<br />
Figure 34: Telecommunication<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
At least 355 villages recorded that the quality of cell phone reception is bad compared to 333<br />
villages that said the reception is good. 388 villages recorded that their Television reception<br />
is bad compared to 329 that recorded that the TV reception is good. 381 villages further<br />
recorded that their Radio reception is good compared to 337 that indicated that it is bad.
159<br />
Elias Motsoaledi has the highest number of villages where cell phone reception is bad (94)<br />
followed by Greater Tubatse (80); Fetakgomo (68); Makhuduthamaga (69) and Ephraim<br />
Mogale (44).<br />
Greater Tubatse has the highest number of villages where TV reception is described as bad<br />
(105) followed by Elias Motsoaledi (95); Makhuduthamaga (85); Fetakgomo (63) and<br />
Ephraim Mogale (40 villages)<br />
The district municipality and its locals must develop strategies that will lead to improved<br />
coverage of telecommunication in the villages. This will be achieved if stakeholders such as<br />
SABC and Cell phone Service Providers are brought on board.<br />
3.4.8. Roads and Stormwater<br />
The development of the road and transport network in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is of vital importance<br />
given the planned economic trajectory of the <strong>District</strong>, as well as the potential offered by<br />
Dilokong Corridor. In general, the district is well connected to its surrounding areas to the<br />
East, West and South. However, geographic factors had hindered connectivity impeded road<br />
construction there. There is, in fact a stretch of approximately 150km between<br />
Lebowakgomo and the R36 through the JG Strijdom tunnel without tarred road access<br />
northwards.<br />
Within the <strong>District</strong> itself, there is a general lack of roads – and of tarred roads in particularly –<br />
connecting the inner section of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, which consists largely of scattered villages with<br />
minimum economic activity at present. The <strong>District</strong> has decided however, not to encourage<br />
continued scattered development at present – and future transport routes will therefore be<br />
concentrated along the major nodes of economic activity. It is hoped that this will encourage<br />
workers from the rural areas to urban areas – a philosophy in line with the NSDP principles.<br />
In contrast to the inner section of the <strong>District</strong>, the semi-urban areas of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> are<br />
relatively well-serviced by the Provincial and National routes running through it. These<br />
routes, as will be seen later in this section, are supporting the area’s main economic<br />
activities reasonably well at present. What remains to be seen, however, is whether the<br />
planned platinum mining expansion in the area will be adequately served by current<br />
infrastructure in the <strong>District</strong>. Roads and stormwater drainage is estimated at 30 727.<br />
There are number of stormwater structures on the road network under ownership of SDM<br />
and are summarized as follows:<br />
Table 48: Number of the structures on the road network under ownership of SDM<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong> No. of No. of major No. of minor<br />
bridges culverts culverts<br />
No.<br />
Drifts<br />
of
160<br />
Fetakgomo 2 7 75 15<br />
Ephraim Mogale 1 13 <strong>14</strong>8 0<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 4 13 212 0<br />
Makhuduthamaga 4 15 247 7<br />
Tubatse 13 31 247 29<br />
Total 24 79 929 51<br />
Source: Road Master Plan: 2006<br />
There is currently no Stormwater drainage Structure Master Plan at the <strong>District</strong> level. The<br />
<strong>District</strong> needs to develop the Stormwater Master Plan in the Fetakgomo <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
The Road Network in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
According to the powers and functions, the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is responsible for the<br />
development of roads only in Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has<br />
one major national road within it (the N11), as well as several provincial arterial routes<br />
including the R25, R33, R36, R37, R555, R573 and R579. There are also a limited number<br />
of tarred minor roads, such as those leading into Jane Furse. The remainders of the roads in<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, however, are largely gravel roads that serve to connect the rural areas within<br />
the <strong>District</strong>. The total length of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Roads network under the <strong>District</strong>’s control is<br />
at 1,491 km. The following table summarizes the situation as per municipality.<br />
Table 49: Road network in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (<strong>District</strong> Roads)<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong> Length (km) % of Network<br />
Fetakgomo 188 13<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 2<strong>23</strong> 15<br />
Ephraim Mogale <strong>23</strong>6 16<br />
Greater Tubatse 392 26<br />
Makhuduthamaga 452 30<br />
Total <strong>14</strong>91 100<br />
Source: SDM (undated) Road Master Plan: Draft<br />
The current backlog is as follows:<br />
· Upgrading of 71.89 kilometers from unpaved to paved for Fetakgomo municipal<br />
roads.<br />
· Upgrading of 187 kilometers of <strong>District</strong> roads from unpaved to paved<br />
· Re-gravelling of 1.22 kilometers of <strong>District</strong> Roads.<br />
The above-mentioned backlogs clearly indicate that a substantial amount of money is<br />
required over a period of time to redress the situation.<br />
The railway network
161<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> district has three railway lines, originally developed to serve mining activity<br />
in the area. These are:<br />
· The railway line entering <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> in the south next to Stoffburg, which continues<br />
northwards for 30kms (it leads to an abandoned mine near the Mapochs mine).<br />
· The line entering <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> in the west near Nutfield, which continues eastwards<br />
to Marble Hall.<br />
· The line entering <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> in the east, passes near Ohrigstad and Burgersfort<br />
(past abandoned mine) and ends near Steelpoort (near the Tubatse Mine).<br />
It became obvious that these lines, originally developed to serve past mining and agricultural<br />
activities in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, have not been re-routed to serve new (or future) mines in the area.<br />
If this continues, the results will be that mining expansion in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> will place additional<br />
burden on the road network in the area. Beyond commercial usage, a commuter rail link<br />
between Pretoria and south-west part if <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (along the Moloto Road) will clearly be<br />
useful, given the high levels of male migrancy.<br />
Limpopo’s Development Corridors and <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Roads<br />
The LGDP identified four development corridors, which will drive future economic<br />
development in the province. Of these, the Dilokong and Phalaborwa Corridors travel<br />
through the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> and are of immediate economic relevance for the area.<br />
The Dilokong Corridor includes three important roads that fall within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area.<br />
These are:<br />
· Polokwane to Burgersfort (P33/1 and P33/2 via Mafefe<br />
· Flag Boshielo Dam through Lebowakgomo and Mafefe, linking the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> with the Phalaborwa and Kruger National Park.<br />
· Chuenespoort via Boyne to Mankweng<br />
· The Phalaborwa Corridor connects Hazyview (Mpumalanga) with Phalaborwa and<br />
Tzaneen through a number of small towns on the western side of the Kruger National<br />
Park. It includes two roads sections that fall within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area.<br />
· Route section P17/3-5, D726, P112/1-3, P43/2, D1308 and P54/1.<br />
· Road section P<strong>14</strong>6/1 from Klaserie to Blyde River, P116/1 from Hoedspruit to<br />
Ohrigstad via the Strijdom Tunnel and P181/1 from the Oaks to Burgersfort.<br />
The district will look carefully into the prioritization of these roads, given their economic<br />
significance in both <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> and the province more generally.<br />
Implications for future Economic growth in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>
162<br />
The road network in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is clearly in need of some maintenance in the future. This<br />
will became especially important given the planned economic growth of the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
Figure 35: Gravel and Tarred Roads<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
It has been established that 92% of the local access roads are gravel (657 roads) compared<br />
to 8% (56 roads) that are tarred. The highest number of local access gravel roads is found in<br />
Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (201 roads) followed by Makhuduthamaga Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> (171 roads); Elias Motsoaledi (134 roads); Fetakgomo (88 roads) and Ephraim<br />
Mogale (63 roads). All these roads are local access roads.<br />
The district municipality and its locals must work collaboratively to establish the extent of<br />
these roads (kilometres) and development of strategies to ensure maintenance of these<br />
roads. Most communities prefer tarring as solutions however other methods need to be<br />
explored.<br />
Challenges<br />
· Grading of internal access roads (streets)<br />
· Construction of bridges<br />
· The tarring of roads<br />
· Provincial arterial roads are deteriorating rapidly because of a lack of maintenance<br />
· Local access roads are gravel, below standard and used mainly by buses and taxis<br />
· Local gravel roads also need stormwater management<br />
3.4.9. Waste Management<br />
Introduction
163<br />
Waste Management forms an important part of basic service delivery in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
<strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
Status Quo<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has developed the Integrated Waste Management<br />
Plan (IWMP) that needs to be adopted by council. Waste removal is being provided in urban<br />
centres like Marble Hall, Groblersdal and Burgersfort. These municipal areas have organized<br />
waste collection systems. Permitted landfill sites are in Marble Hall, Jane Furse and recently<br />
(Malogeng and Mphanama) in Fetakgomo. The Jane Furse pilot landfill site is now operating<br />
according to permit requirements as per legislation.<br />
The waste disposal collection has just started in some parts of Makhuduthamaga and<br />
Fetakgomo. The landfill site in Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has already reached capacity. The<br />
SDM has developed plans to assist Tubatse in securing a new landfill site license. A process<br />
to conduct Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) and the facilitation of permitting the landfill<br />
site at Elias Motsoaledi has been initiated. Rosennekal landfill site at Elias Motsoaledi is<br />
issued with the permit. The <strong>District</strong> is also establishing a waste transfer station at Hlogotlou<br />
Township in Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
Refuse removal processes do not cover most villages in all Local Municipalities. The backlog<br />
for refuse removal is estimated at 162 041. This poses serious health risk, especially when<br />
accompanied by minimal access to clean water. These areas are therefore fairly susceptible<br />
to the outbreak of diseases and other environmental conditions.<br />
The informal disposal of waste in the <strong>District</strong> is a source of concern, as it causes<br />
environmental pollution and hazards. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> residents also need to be more aware of<br />
sound waste management practices. For the municipalities themselves, the key challenge is<br />
to maintain existing disposal sites and to provide new sites and to provide in areas that lack<br />
them. Local Municipalities should make budgets available and follow their Integrated Waste<br />
Management Plans in their possession for the waste development infrastructure.<br />
Challenges<br />
· Refuse removal do not cover most villages<br />
· Minimal access to clean water<br />
· Informal disposal of waste<br />
· One of the landfill sites has reached capacity<br />
· Maintenance of the existing landfill sites.<br />
· Budgeting for waste management at some Local Municipalities<br />
· Awareness of our communities on good waste management practices
164<br />
3.4.10. Environmental Management<br />
Introduction<br />
Across the globe, environmental stresses and major changes in climate conditions are<br />
influencing the lives and livelihoods of ordinary people ad communities everywhere. This is<br />
no less true of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>. The recent draught in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, for instance, is<br />
widely regarded as the result of the much publicized El Niño and La Niña phenomena<br />
(Ziervogel et al, 2006).<br />
The increasingly important role that climate plays in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area has recently been<br />
highlighted in some few studies. What is becoming even more evident is that rainfalls<br />
patterns in the <strong>District</strong> are highly variable – a situation that tends to disrupt a wide range of<br />
socio–economic activities in the area such as rain-fed crop production, often with very little<br />
warning. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has in fact been significantly affected by both El Niño and La Niña<br />
events in recent years. This has affected the amounts of rainfall received in the area. El Niño<br />
tends to be associated with below average rainfall, whilst La Niña often incurs above<br />
average rainfall.<br />
Status Quo<br />
Geology<br />
The regional geology consists of the Eastern Bushveld and Springbok flats region. The<br />
overall geology of the area is classified as follows:<br />
- Gabbro (South of the R37)<br />
- Anorte band (adjacent to the R37)<br />
- Clinopyroxenite (to the North of R37)<br />
- Arenite (adjacent to the Olifants River)<br />
The Springbok flats coal fields are found on the Western side of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />
The Transvaal Supergroup is found in Ephraim Mogale towards the east of the <strong>District</strong>, as<br />
well as in an arc inscribed by the Northern Drakensburg in the Far East. The stones and<br />
rocks found within the Transvaal Supergroup include dolomite, limestone, iron-formation,<br />
shale and quartzite, amongst other (Goode, 2006).<br />
As previous sections have highlighted, the unique geology of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has bequeathed<br />
the <strong>District</strong> with the largest reserves of platinum group metals in the world. The renowned<br />
Bushveld Complex is found at the centres of the region. The western portion contains acidic<br />
rocks, whilst the Eastern site has basic rocks which contain metal minerals. It is the latter<br />
that is of economic significance. The Merensky Reef is found within this Complex, and<br />
contains major deposits of the platinum group metal, nickel, copper and cobalt.
165<br />
Topography<br />
The Oliphant River is located on an open flood plain area. A valley surrounded by the nonperennial<br />
rivers is found to the north of the river. Strips of erosion can be found in the valley<br />
alongside most of the perennial rivers. Wood is still one of the main sources of energy for<br />
households, which leads to deforestation and subsequent erosion because of the denuding<br />
vegetation. The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> does not have Environmental Management<br />
Inspectors to help educate the communities about conservation of the land, fauna and flora<br />
for the future. One of the major environmental problems in the area is inappropriate<br />
agricultural methods, which leads to overgrazing and even desertification in places like<br />
Thabanaseshu. Overgrazing is also the result of too many livestock units per area of land.<br />
We also have a problem of pesticide poisoning in the farming areas along the Olifants River<br />
due to aerial and other forms of crop spraying of which also affects communities alongside<br />
the river and neighboring villages. This issue of pesticides can't, be ruled out that it also<br />
contributes to water pollution down the rivers and streams if mismanaged.<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Climate<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area is characterized by a hot climate in the Olifans River Valley. The<br />
average temperature shows moderate fluctuation with average summer temperatures of<br />
<strong>23</strong>˚C as well as a maximum of 28˚C and a minimum of 18˚C. In winter, the average is 13.5˚C<br />
with the maximum of 20˚C and a minimum of 7˚C (as measured at the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Weather<br />
Station).<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is located in the Summer Rainfall Zone of the country, and receives more than<br />
80% of its rainfall between November and March. The Southern parts of the area receives<br />
more rain (between 600mm – 800mm annually), whilst the Northern parts receives only<br />
500mm – 600mm by comparison. This limits the type of agricultural activity that can take<br />
place in the north.<br />
The mean annual participation as measured at the Zebediela Weather station from 1949-<br />
2001 was 51mm. most of the precipitation occurs between October and March, with the<br />
highest average monthly rainfall during January (100,84mm) and the lowest during <strong>July</strong><br />
(2,89mm). Thunderstorms, with the associated low soil penetration and high level of erosion,<br />
are common in the area. It would also appear as if El Noño and La Niña phenomena<br />
significantly influence the amounts of rainfall received in the area (Ziervogel et al, 2006).<br />
There is considerable variability in terms of rainfall intensity, duration and frequency. This<br />
exacerbates the water shortage problem, which is a key developmental constraint in the<br />
<strong>District</strong>. Increasingly sparse rainfall, as well as a high evaporation rate, is also currently<br />
limiting subsistence farming in the <strong>District</strong> – a situation that has contributed food insecurity<br />
mentioned earlier in this <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />
Water Scarcity
166<br />
Water scarcity is a huge developmental challenge within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>, and<br />
constrains both economic and social activity in the area. The issue is a manifestation of<br />
climate variability. However, it is also the result of a number of other factors, which include<br />
insufficient and variable rainfall, inequitable water resource management and the absence of<br />
drinking water, bulk water and irrigation infrastructure that would aid the distribution of water<br />
to rural villages (SEI, 2006).<br />
Water scarcity affects a range of other developmental issues in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> – Municipal<br />
service delivery, subsistence farming activities, commercial agriculture and the expansion of<br />
the mining sector. Its implications for development are mentioned throughout this <strong>IDP</strong>, and it<br />
is a key constraint for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />
Challenges<br />
- The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> is currently subject to enormous variations in rainfall, which<br />
affect crop production and sustainable livelihoods.<br />
More specifically, the key challenges are:<br />
• Rainfall patterns in the district are highly variable, disrupting agricultural production<br />
and causing related socio-economic stresses.<br />
• Because of its climatic profile, the <strong>District</strong> is currently susceptible to all kinds of and<br />
phenomena variations in climate just like the whole world as is affected by climate<br />
which exacerbates the water shortage problem that is already a key developmental<br />
constraint in the area.<br />
• There is also drought, overgrazing and soil erosion in most parts of the district<br />
including deforestation of our land.<br />
• There is a serious need to control pesticide poisoning and other forms of chemical<br />
pollutions.<br />
• The district also has a challenge of air pollution from the industrialised and mining<br />
areas that warrants urgent attention in terms of resources.<br />
• Environmental Health is another field that if left unattended, negative accumulative<br />
effects will be a problem to deal with in the near future.<br />
3.4.11. Sports, Arts and Culture<br />
Introduction<br />
Sport, Arts and Culture play an important role in the physical, psychological, social, technical<br />
and tactical development of young and matured people. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
plays an advocacy role/ function whereby most of the programmes are driven by the<br />
provincial department of Sport, Arts and Culture.<br />
Status Quo
167<br />
Our communities participate in various sport, arts and culture projects that are meant to<br />
promote a healthy lifestyle in the society. They understand the benefits of sport, arts and<br />
culture. There has recently been an integration of sport, arts and culture programmes in<br />
schools and community sport supported by the district. Some of the supported programmes<br />
include capacity-building for managers, coaches and umpires/referees of the regional teams.<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Satellite Academy of Sport has been established and provided with equipment<br />
worth R500 000 from Lottery to support sport development programmes. The performance<br />
squad of all the codes will be subjected to capacity-building programmes in preparations for<br />
the Provincial games.<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> and its local municipalities provide a measure of<br />
professional and financial support to youths ,the primary aim being to identify, nurture and<br />
promote talent in terms of athletes, artists, crafters and designers.<br />
Challenges<br />
· Poor maintenance of existing sport, arts and culture facilities.<br />
· Under-funding of sport, arts and culture development programmes.<br />
· Insufficient professional support for sport, arts and culture programme by local<br />
municipalities.<br />
· Inadequate capacity-building programmes<br />
· Lack of professional facilities within the local municipalities.<br />
· Lack of personnel at <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Satellite Academy of Sport (Maleoskop)<br />
· Lack of Arts and Culture Centres<br />
3.4.12. Health<br />
Introduction<br />
South Africa huge health care resources compared with many middle-income countries, yet<br />
the bulk of these resources are in the private sector and serve a minority of the population<br />
thereby undermining the country’s ability to produce quality care and improve healthcare<br />
outcomes. Many of the public facilities, especially hospitals and clinics need to be revitalized.<br />
National government should expand on progress made in upgrading facilities in many public<br />
hospitals and clinics as part of a physical infrastructure programme. The government is<br />
determined to end the huge inequalities that exist in the public and private sectors by making<br />
sure that these sectors work together.<br />
As promulgated in the Constitution, Schedule 4 part A, health services is a functional area of<br />
National and Provincial legislative competence. In terms of section 155 (6) (a) the Provincial<br />
government must provide for the monitoring and support of local government in the<br />
Province, albeit can be assigned to a municipality in terms of Section 156 of Constitution.
168<br />
The government has identified the following priorities that must inform a major improvement<br />
in the health care system:<br />
• Increasing bursaries of the health care professionals, including increasing the<br />
employment of community health workers, which will be linked to the improvement of<br />
the district health system.<br />
• Improving working conditions and the provision of decent wages for health workers.<br />
• Reduce the impact of HIV/AIDS on individuals, families, communities and society by<br />
expanding access to appropriate treatment, care and support.<br />
• Strengthen the fight against AIDS through collaboration with partners at all levels of<br />
society and accelerate implementation of the HIV and AIDS and STI plans.<br />
• Strengthen the formal partnership against AIDS at all levels of our society including<br />
the strengthening the South African National AIDS Council (SANAC).<br />
• Improve quality of health services and physical infrastructure revitalization.<br />
Health services are critical in nurturing human development and tend to have important<br />
economic spin-offs as well. Countries that have invested significantly in primary health care<br />
(PHC), in particular, generally produce a healthier, and therefore more productive,<br />
workforce. There is also significant international evidence to illustrate that early investments<br />
in PHC result in less strain on the health budget (and, consequently, on social spending) in<br />
later years. This is an important debate for municipalities which are now largely responsible<br />
for PHC in South Africa.<br />
Status Quo<br />
Within Limpopo province, the provision of health facilities is generally inadequate in<br />
comparison with other provinces. More specifically, access to health facilities within<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> itself is fairly poor. On average, there is 1 clinic for every<br />
17,000 people within the district and approximately 97,500 people per hospital.<br />
Table 50: Number of health facilities in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Clinics 76<br />
Community Health Centres 6<br />
Mobile services 21<br />
<strong>District</strong> hospitals 5<br />
Regional hospital 2<br />
Provincial tertiary 0<br />
Public sector facilities and beds (2005)
169<br />
Central hospitals 0<br />
Specialised hospitals 0<br />
Private hospitals -<br />
Beds 1,386<br />
Source: Barron, P et al (2006). The <strong>District</strong> Health Barometer: 2005/06.<br />
Accessibility of health services<br />
Clinics and hospitals are evenly distributed throughout the <strong>District</strong>, but accessibility remains<br />
difficult because of poor roads, inadequate transportation and so forth.<br />
Table 51: Access to hospitals<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Percentage within 20km radius to hospital<br />
Fetakgomo 40%<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 80%<br />
Makhuduthamaga 80%<br />
Ephraim Mogale 40%<br />
Tubatse 78%<br />
The residents of Fetakgomo, Elias Motsoaledi, Makhuduthamaga and Tubatse all have<br />
relatively easy access to hospitals in the district. This is not the case for Ephraim Mogale.<br />
These differences may be attributed to the relative population density of each of the area;<br />
however, the table below indicates the access that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> residents have to clinics and<br />
health professionals.<br />
Table 52: Access to clinics and professionals<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Percentage within 5km radius to clinics<br />
Fetakgomo 51%<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 64%<br />
Makhuduthamaga 48%<br />
Ephraim Mogale 47%<br />
Tubatse 45%
170<br />
According to these figures, Elias Motsoaledi enjoys the greatest access (64%), whilst<br />
Tubatse residents have access to clinics and health professionals (45%). The number of<br />
health professionals currently working in the district is not optimal, however. As the table<br />
below indicates, there is a shortage of professionals working in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> health facilities<br />
at the moment.<br />
Table 53: Availability of professional staff in clinics and hospitals<br />
Personal category Number Employed Number per 1000 people<br />
Medical Officers 32 0,02<br />
Professional nurses 492 0,34<br />
Pharmacists 6 0,00<br />
Staff Nurses 297 0,20<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s Health Performance<br />
According to the independently-published <strong>District</strong> Health Barometer² (P Barron et al, 2006),<br />
the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has the lowest per capita expenditure on primary health care (PHC)<br />
in South Africa at just R115 per person.<br />
The table below outlines key health indicators for the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>. The second last<br />
column (district ranking in South Africa) is particularly revealing because it shows how<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> ranks in terms of the other district/metros in the country. In this column, a score<br />
of 1 means it is the best performer in the country, whilst a rating 53 rd means that it is the<br />
worst.<br />
Table 54: Ranking <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s performance in SA: Key health indicators<br />
Indicator<br />
Inputs into the health system<br />
Expressed<br />
as:<br />
2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 DM ranking National<br />
in SA (I53) Value<br />
Amt spent on non-hospital ZAR 115 53 rd <strong>23</strong>2<br />
PHC health services per<br />
person<br />
Proportion of district health % 3,3 5,0<br />
services expenditure on<br />
management
171<br />
Proportion of district health % 61,8 45,0<br />
services expenditure on<br />
management<br />
Process<br />
Nurse clinical workload<br />
Patients<br />
seen/day<br />
8,7 15,1 13,1 31,6<br />
Average length of stay Days 4,4 3,6 3,8 27 th 4,3<br />
Bed utilization rate % 52,9 56,9 65,5 30 th 63,9<br />
Outputs of health system<br />
Govt. distribution of condoms No of 5,1 5,5 7,9 24 th 8,8<br />
at PHC facilities<br />
condoms<br />
distributed<br />
per male<br />
p.a.<br />
% of children (under 1yr) who % 68,2 74,0 88,9 28 th 90,3<br />
complete their primary course<br />
of immunization<br />
% of children who dropped out % 7,2 8,1 3,5 19 th 4,7<br />
b/w the 1 st and 3 rd dose of DTP<br />
vaccine<br />
% of deliveries carried out by % 8,8 9,5 10,3 18,4<br />
Caesarean section<br />
Proportion of ANC clients % 15,4 24,0 42,7 33 rd -<br />
tested for HIV<br />
HIV prevalence among ANC % 12,7 11,8 13,9 11 th -<br />
clients tested<br />
Nevirapine uptake rate among % 50,1 54,9 68,6 7 th 51,7<br />
newborn babies of HIV +<br />
women (%)<br />
Health outcomes<br />
PHC utilization rate Visits to 1,5 1,5 1,5 49 th 2,1<br />
PHC<br />
facilities per<br />
person p.a.
172<br />
Incidence of sexually transited No. of new 3,4 3,2 3,1 15 th 4,8<br />
infections treated – new episodes of<br />
STIs treated<br />
TB cure rate % 49,1 54,8 29 th 50,8<br />
(2004<br />
TB smear conversion rate % 53,7 40,1 45 th 50,5<br />
Diarrhea incidence under 5 yrs. New 115,0 <strong>14</strong>9,4 222,2 25 th 257,7<br />
cases/100 0<br />
children<br />
Not gaining weight under 5 yrs. % 2,1 2,1 2,0 35 th 1,4<br />
rate<br />
Delivery rate in facility % 72,4 101,0 104,2 4 th 81,1<br />
Eventual impact<br />
Stillbirth rate No of 32,2 26,2 26,3 31 st 24,8<br />
stillbirths/<br />
1000 births<br />
Perinatal mortality rate in No of 49,4 152,9 39,3 36 th 34,5<br />
facility<br />
stillbirths +<br />
deaths in<br />
first 7 days<br />
of life/1000<br />
births<br />
Source: Adapted from Barron, Petal (2006). The <strong>District</strong> Health Barometer: 2005/06<br />
The particularly worrying aspects of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s health services are highlighted in the<br />
table above. The most obvious point of concern is the low levels of spending on PHC in a<br />
<strong>District</strong> that is predominantly rural and has high levels of poverty. The nevirapine uptake rate<br />
among newborn babies of HIV positive women is also quite low in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, compared to<br />
the rest of the country. The PHC utilization rate is also comparatively low at 1, 5 visits per<br />
person annually (compared to the national average of 2, 1 visits).<br />
According to the <strong>District</strong> Health Barometer, the improved immunization coverage rate,<br />
accompanied by declining drop-out rates, over the years indicate that there has been a<br />
successful immunization programme in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
HIV/AIDS
173<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted HIV/AIDS Plan in 2007 and reviewed it in<br />
2009. According to the Limpopo Facility Indicator Data 2008/09 an official record of the<br />
spread of the HIV/AIDS plan in the Department of health and social development is as<br />
indicated below:<br />
Table 55: State of HIV/AIDS<br />
Total Stats June 2009<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> Name of facility Female Male Children Total Stats Grant<br />
Sept 09 Total<br />
Elias Motsoaledi Groblersdal Hospital 216 103 33 71 4<strong>23</strong><br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Philadelphia Hospital 1037 353 122 32 1544<br />
Fetakgomo<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Ephraim<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Greater<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Local Motsepe Clinic 35 3 0 15 53<br />
Nchabeleng Hospital / 126 33 0 13 182<br />
CHC<br />
Mogale Matlala Hospital 499 102 33 61 695<br />
Tubatse Burgersfort CHC 133 57 17 75 282<br />
Dilokong Hospital 456 1<strong>14</strong> 44 33 647<br />
Mecklenburg Hospital 46 217 27 <strong>23</strong> 313<br />
Makhuduthamaga<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Jane Furse Hospital 774 222 54 51 1101<br />
St Rita’s Hospital 1375 542 261 124 <strong>23</strong>02<br />
Source: Limpopo-Facility Indicator Data 2008-09 A<br />
The significance of the statistics above is that there are people infected with HIV/AIDS in the<br />
<strong>District</strong>. The Department of Health and Social Development has a comprehensive system of<br />
testing, administering of treatment and counseling. The main challenge facing the<br />
department is that testing is voluntary. As a result more effort is needed to convince people<br />
to come to the fore and be tested. This should be accompanied by prior counseling to enable<br />
people who will be diagnosed HIV/AIDS to live with themselves.<br />
The Department has also rolled out a treatment plan which seems to be effective. It is<br />
however displeasing to note that some patients are skipping their dosages. The challenge<br />
could be the stigma that is attached to the disease by communities. More should be done to<br />
educate the community about the normally of living with virus.
174<br />
The <strong>District</strong> has engendered the following interventionist measures to try and fight the<br />
scourge:<br />
In <strong>July</strong> 2002, the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> development an HIV/AIDS strategy to guide public<br />
interventions in the area. The <strong>District</strong> also launched the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> HIV/AIDS Council<br />
whose key focus areas are education and awareness raising, support for people living with<br />
HIV/AIDS and care for children in distress.<br />
NGOs such as Love Life and others also provide support in awareness and education<br />
campaigns aimed at reducing HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases within the<br />
<strong>District</strong>.<br />
The <strong>District</strong> also launched a <strong>District</strong> Health Council, which will serve as advisory body to the<br />
Mayors on health matters and develop strategies on how to accelerate service delivery in<br />
the <strong>District</strong>. The major challenge at the moment is a serious lack of facilities to manage<br />
diseases in all health care facilities. The focus in the next financial years will include support<br />
to NGOs that work with people infected and affected by HIV/AIDS.<br />
BACKLOGS FOR BUILDING OF CLINICS<br />
Table 56: Backlog for Building of Clinics<br />
Name of <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Clinics<br />
Ephraim Mogale 8<br />
Greater Tubatse 5<br />
Makhuduthamaga 4<br />
Fetakgomo 6<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 5<br />
TOTAL/SDM 22<br />
Source: Dept. Of Health and Social Development – 2009<br />
Table 57: Health facilities<br />
Fetakgomo Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Tubatse Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Makhuduthamaga Total<br />
Mobile<br />
clinic 19 36 48 37 56 196<br />
Clinic 15 <strong>14</strong> 28 16 22 95<br />
Hospital 0 1 2 2 2 7<br />
No<br />
health<br />
facility 72 11 <strong>14</strong>2 87 82 394
175<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
There are 298 health facilities in the district municipality. Of the 298 facilities, there are 196<br />
mobile clinics, 95 clinics and 7 hospitals. In 394 of the villages there are no health facilities<br />
that are provided or even mobile facilities. 2 Hospitals are located in Greater Tubatse Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong>, which is, Dilokong Hospital and Mcklenburg Hospital. Makhuduthamaga also<br />
hosts two hospitals namely, Jane Furse Hospital and St. Ritas. In Elias Motsoaledi Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> there is Groblersdal hospital and Philadelphia hospital. The final hospital is<br />
located at Tsimanyane which is Matlala Hospital.<br />
The provision of health facilities is the responsibility of the department of health. In general,<br />
because of the dispersed spatial structure of the district, people still travel long distances to<br />
access health facilities and in many areas there is still mobile facilities that are often not<br />
reliable and at times not providing comprehensive health care.<br />
Table 58: Health facilities satisfaction status<br />
Fetakgomo Ephraim Tubatse Elias Makhudut Total Total<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Motsoaledi hamaga<br />
Satisfactory 11 6 10 8 5 40 13%<br />
Unsatisfacto<br />
ry 20 44 76 45 80 265 87%<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
In the 298 health facilities that were surveyed, 40 (13%) of them were recorded as providing<br />
service that is satisfactory and a high number 265 (87%) were seen as providing inferior<br />
service. Therefore <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> must work with the Department of<br />
Health to deal with the weaknesses that may exist so that the service is improved<br />
tremendously.<br />
Table 59: Health Facilities water supply<br />
Ephraim<br />
Elias<br />
%<br />
Fetakgomo M Tubatse M Makhuduthamaga Total<br />
Borehole 16 5 37 18 28 104 34%<br />
Municipal<br />
10%<br />
Water 0 12 1 0 16 29<br />
River 1 0 1 1 9 12 4%<br />
Water Tanks 7 4 11 22 7%<br />
Other 12 32 40 21 31 136 45%<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
The data shows that 104 of the health facilities in the district are using borehole water<br />
compared to 29 that are using municipal water. 22 of the health facilities are using water<br />
tankers to supply water and a great number (45%) are using other systems.
176<br />
There is a need for the district to develop a strategy for providing water to health facilities on<br />
a sustainable basis and it could also serve as a basis for revenue enhancement. The focus<br />
should be on the 7 hospitals that exist and the strategy could look at both water and<br />
sanitation provision.<br />
It is very common to establish that most hospitals in the district are using their own private<br />
and independent sanitation system (such as ponds) which is not the highest level of service<br />
that can be expected.<br />
Table 60: Health facilities sanitation supply<br />
Ephraim<br />
Fetakgomo Mogale Tubatse<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Makhudu<br />
thamaga Total %<br />
Pit<br />
Latrines 20 11 30 21 40 122 37%<br />
VIP 4 8 9 0 4 25 8%<br />
Sewer 6 <strong>14</strong> <strong>14</strong> 12 46 <strong>14</strong>%<br />
Other 10 33 31 31 28 133 41%<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
With regard to sanitation provision, 122 (37%) of the health facilities are making use of pit<br />
latrines as a form of sanitation. 25 (8%) are using Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines as<br />
sanitation and only 46 (<strong>14</strong>%) are making use of sewer borne sanitation. The remainder, 133<br />
(41%) are using other systems.<br />
Access to sanitation is still a big challenge in the district where 220 000 households are<br />
using pit latrines and 13 510 have no sanitation at all. The district working together with<br />
department of health need to prioritise those critical health facilities that require sanitation<br />
supply. Sanitation is inextricably linked to water supply and it is obvious that once water<br />
supply is dealt with, then it will also be easier to extend sanitation to health facilities.<br />
Table 61: Health Facilities electricity available<br />
Fetakgomo Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Tubatse Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Total %<br />
Yes 22 15 42 30 39 <strong>14</strong>8 49%<br />
No 12 30 44 21 45 152 51%<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
49% of the health facilities surveyed have access to electricity compared to 51% that have<br />
no access to electricity. Although health facilities that have no access to electricity might<br />
seem higher, it is because most facilities are mobile clinics and therefore it is highly probable<br />
that the villages which they serve do have electricity. Access to electricity in the district for<br />
households stands at 86% and therefore should not be of concern.<br />
Challenges
177<br />
• Improvement of health services in terms of Customer Care<br />
• Lack of more funding for primary Health Care.<br />
• Inadequate health infrastructure,<br />
• Inaccessibility of health due to poor roads and inadequate transportation<br />
• Lack of health professionals in clinics and hospitals.<br />
• Lack of medication at clinics and mobile clinics.<br />
• Stigma attached to the HIV/AIDS disease by communities.<br />
• Awareness campaign to educate the community about the normality of living with the<br />
Virus.<br />
3.4.13. Education<br />
Introduction<br />
In terms of Schedule 4 Part A of the Constitution, education at all levels, excluding tertiary<br />
institutions, falls under the function areas of concurrent national and Provincial Legislative<br />
competence. As such all education related issues in the <strong>District</strong> are dealt with by the<br />
Limpopo Department of Education (LDoE).<br />
Education is a means of promoting good citizenship as well as preparing our people for the<br />
needs of a modern economy and a democratic society. Building on the achievements in<br />
education, the government must aim to ensure progressive realization of universal<br />
schooling, improving quality education and eliminating disparities and inequalities.<br />
Education is important for both economic and social development. It is the bedrock on which<br />
a nation’s economic destiny is built, particularly in today’s global knowledge economy. It is<br />
also often the primary means through which individuals set out on their personal journeys of<br />
growth and attain their distinctive dreams and aspirations. International evidence suggests<br />
that invest significantly in education reap major economic benefits in the medium to long<br />
term, and help build a more cohesive social fabric within the nation.<br />
Status Quo<br />
The Percentage of the population in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is older than 20 years of age with no<br />
schooling and is the highest in Limpopo and Mpumalanga provinces. That figure is also<br />
more than twice that of the South African population.<br />
The table below sets out the education profile of each local municipality in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />
Table 62: Education profile per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> None Primary Secondary Tertiary Unspecified/<br />
Disability<br />
Under<br />
age of 5<br />
Fetakgomo 32,318 19,705 <strong>23</strong>,665 1,077 2,5<strong>23</strong> 11,441<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 67,084 60,165 57,<strong>14</strong>4 3,262 10,124 30,103
178<br />
Ephraim Mogale 24,318 25,156 21,681 1,022 2,750 12,046<br />
Tubatse 62,401 48,003 48,331 1,488 6,967 27,419<br />
Makhuduthamaga 86,392 77,158 69,715 3,415 7,905 39,254<br />
Total 272,513 <strong>23</strong>0,187 220,536 10,264 30,269 120,263<br />
% 278,8 <strong>23</strong>,5 22,5 1,0 3,0 12,3<br />
Source: 2006-07 SDM <strong>IDP</strong><br />
As indicated in the table above, the <strong>District</strong> has a relatively high illiteracy level, with almost<br />
28% of the population having no formal school education whatsoever. Only around 1% of the<br />
population has obtained tertiary educations. Currently within the district there are crèches,<br />
Pre Schools, Special School, ABET Centres, Primary schools, Secondary schools and FET<br />
Colleges. Early Childhood Development (ECD) is still lacking in our <strong>District</strong>. There is still little<br />
or no focus at all on ECD. There are no Universities in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
The LEGDP indicate that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has the least of highly skilled individuals in the total<br />
province. The low skills reduce the ability of the <strong>District</strong> to be innovative and economically<br />
productive.<br />
While there has been an improvement, this has been far below that of the other DMs in the<br />
Limpopo Province. The percentage of those with Grade 12/Matric in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> DM is also<br />
nearly half of the South African population and the lowest of all the DMS in the Limpopo and<br />
Mpumalanga provinces. The lack of skills is frustrating the current and future development of<br />
the area. It is also the high percentages of persons with no schooling which require a<br />
buoyant entrepreneurial class to establish industries that those with low skills levels could be<br />
absorbed in.<br />
The low percentage of the population having managed to obtained tertiary education<br />
qualification bear witness to the infrastructure that is available in schools. Most of the<br />
schools in the district do not have facilities like Sanitation, Water and Electricity. Shortage of<br />
infrastructure impacts much on future educational development of this district.<br />
Table 63: Shortage of Infrastructure in schools<br />
Total number Schools % Schools % Schools %<br />
of schools without water without<br />
sanitation<br />
without<br />
electricity<br />
905 283 31% 507 56% 203 22%<br />
Source: Limpopo <strong>District</strong> Education department and circuits offices<br />
The above mentioned needs to be aligned with the status quo information the SDM has on<br />
services backlogs to ensure informed, integrated planning and budgeting, not only for the<br />
2009/2010 financial year but the coming outer years. The district municipality will also<br />
continue to work with department of education with regard to necessary information that<br />
would assist in the <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget process.
179<br />
Table 64: Backlogs for the building of schools<br />
Name of <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Number of Schools<br />
1. Fetakgomo 12<br />
2. Makhuduthamaga 22<br />
3. Ephraim Mogale 11<br />
4. Greater Tubatse 06<br />
5. Elias Motsoaledi 05<br />
TOTAL 56<br />
Source: Department of Education<br />
Table 65: Schools per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Fetakgomo Ephraim Tubatse Elias Makhuduthamaga %<br />
Mogale<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Number of 57 62 155 95 167 60%<br />
primary<br />
Number of 33 44 88 60 102 36%<br />
secondary<br />
Number of 4 3 3 21 5 2%<br />
combined<br />
Special 0 0 0 1 0 1%<br />
Schools<br />
FET 0 0 1 1 0 1%<br />
Total 94 109 247 178 274 100%<br />
In the year 2011, 902 educational facilities were recorded across the district. Out of this total<br />
number, 536 are primary schools and 327 are secondary schools. 36 schools were recorded<br />
as combined schools (meaning primary and secondary at same school). There is one<br />
special school that was recorded mainly in Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. It is also<br />
interesting to note that most schools are found in Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (274),<br />
followed by Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (247), Elias Motsoaledi (178) and the<br />
remainder are situated in Ephraim Mogale and Fetakgomo Local Municipalities.<br />
The numbers of educational facilities that have been provided in the district seem to be<br />
adequate in the district. The general standard in that for every 1000 households, there is a<br />
need for 2 primary schools and 1 secondary. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has 263 000<br />
households. This means there is a need for 263 secondary schools and 526 primary<br />
schools. There exists 536 primary schools and the need is 526 compared to existing 327<br />
secondary schools where the need is 263 secondary schools. Although the average<br />
scenario indicates that enough schools have been provided, there is still a challenge due to<br />
long walking distances to these educational facilities.<br />
Table 66: Schools source of water<br />
Ephraim Tubatse Elias<br />
100%<br />
Fetakgomo M M M Makhuduthamaga Total<br />
Borehole 50 42 174 117 167 550 60%<br />
Municipal<br />
water 30 64 9 36 61 200<br />
22%
180<br />
River 0 0 <strong>23</strong> 5 28 3%<br />
Water tanks 0 0 16 8 24 2%<br />
No water<br />
13%<br />
supply 33 6 22 19 36 116<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
The data indicates that 550 (60%) educational facilities obtain water from boreholes. 200<br />
(22%) of the schools in the district get water supply from municipal supply system. There are<br />
schools that still do not have water supply at all standing at 116 (13%). 24 (2%) schools also<br />
obtain water from water tankers.<br />
Provision of water to schools remains within the purview of the Department of education and<br />
the role of the municipalities remains water connections provisions and billing. There is a<br />
need for the district municipality as water services provider and authority to liaise with<br />
Department of Education regarding schools that do not have access to water services.<br />
The schools normally are undertaking feeding schemes which require water for cooking and<br />
boiling therefore it requires that all the relevant stakeholders play an important role in as far<br />
as provision of water.<br />
Table 67: Schools type of sanitation<br />
Fetakgomo<br />
Ephraim<br />
M<br />
Tubatse<br />
M<br />
Elias<br />
M<br />
100%<br />
Makhuduthamaga Total<br />
pit latrines 73 72 189 131 210 675 74%<br />
VIP 24 6 41 43 1<strong>14</strong> 12%<br />
Sewer <strong>14</strong> 8 11 35 11 79 9%<br />
Other 10 4 27 7 48 5%<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Sanitation remains one of the important services that must be provided in schools. The table<br />
indicates that 675 (74%) schools are making use of pit latrines as a form of sanitation. 1<strong>14</strong><br />
(12%) schools are using Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines (VIP’s) and 79 (9%) are making<br />
use of sewer borne sanitation.<br />
Once again the provision of sanitation to educational facilities rests with the Department of<br />
Basic Education and all measures have to be undertaken by the department.<br />
Table 68: Schools electricity availability<br />
Fetakgomo Ephraim M Tubatse M Elias M Makhuduthamaga Total %<br />
Yes 89 100 <strong>23</strong>0 153 <strong>23</strong>5 807 93%<br />
No 13 2 <strong>14</strong> 4 27 60 7%<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
The majority of schools in the district municipality do have access to electricity. The table<br />
above indicates that 807 (93%) recorded that they have access to electricity compared to 60
181<br />
(7%) that have no access to electricity. Most of these schools are found in Makhuduthamaga<br />
(27); followed by Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (<strong>14</strong>) and Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
(13) are the remainder are in Elias Motsoaledi and Ephraim Mogale respectively.<br />
The responsibility for electrification lies with Eskom and it is also the responsibility of the<br />
Department of Basic Education to ensure that schools are electrified to improve learning<br />
environment.<br />
Table 69: Early childhood development centres<br />
Fetakgomo Ephraim Tubatse Elias Makhudutha Total<br />
Mogale<br />
Motsoaledi maga<br />
ECD<br />
available<br />
116 71 191 163 257 798<br />
ECD Not<br />
available<br />
12 10 85 21 0 128<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has 740 villages. There are 798 Early Childhood<br />
Development Centres (ECD’s) across the district. There are 128 villages where ECD’s are<br />
not available. The number of ECD’s far exceeds the number of villages and this is because<br />
in some large villages, there are more than one ECD’s.<br />
Challenges<br />
· Lack of tertiary institutions within the district make percentage of people with post<br />
matric qualifications very low.<br />
· Lack of support to Early Childhood Development (ECD).<br />
· Delivery of basic services like water, sanitation and electricity to school.<br />
· Lack of effective literacy campaigns and ABET Centres to reduce illiteracy level.<br />
· Lack of learnership and bursary schemes for students.<br />
3.4.<strong>14</strong>. Social Services (Welfare)<br />
Introduction<br />
The provision of social services is a competence of concurrent National and Provincial<br />
governments, as promulgated in schedule 4 Part A of the Constitution. Social development<br />
systems form the backbone of assistance to the vulnerable in most advanced societies. Most<br />
countries acknowledge that whilst they strive towards full economic and social development,<br />
the more vulnerable members of society – especially children and the elderly – would require<br />
some form of state assistance.<br />
In many social democratic countries, a basic income grant is also made available to the<br />
poorest members of society to assist them in meeting their basic daily needs. The amount of<br />
money that a government usually spends on social development (and on social expenditure,
182<br />
Local<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Makhu<br />
dutham<br />
aga<br />
more generally) tends to be determined by the economic health of the country at that point in<br />
its history. In South Africa, social expenditure has increased considerably over the years<br />
because of a favourable balance of payments situation as well as increased revenue from<br />
the South African Revenue Services (SARS).<br />
Social development systems are particularly important in places like <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> which are<br />
predominantly rural and have high poverty levels. As illustrated earlier in this chapter, the<br />
majority of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s population is young, unemployment is rife and the district<br />
consequently exhibits an extremely high dependency ratio. Most of this population is<br />
dependent on government grants in order to survive.<br />
Table 70: Statistics on Grant Beneficiaries<br />
O/A D/G W/V COMB GIA FCG<br />
BEN<br />
FCG<br />
CH/<br />
REN<br />
CDG<br />
BEN<br />
CDG<br />
CH/<br />
REN<br />
CSG<br />
BEN<br />
CSH<br />
CH/R<br />
EN<br />
BEN<br />
CH/R<br />
EN<br />
<strong>23</strong>82 5566 10 11 131 1505 2429 683 716 40044 71263 71775 74408<br />
Ephrai<br />
m<br />
Mogale<br />
3857 825 3 4 27 515 877 81 85 8881 15604 <strong>14</strong>193 16566<br />
Fetakg<br />
omo<br />
Greater<br />
Tubats<br />
e<br />
1008<br />
1<br />
1697<br />
0<br />
2249 4 7 44 562 953 180 189 13582 24550 26709 25693<br />
4389 2 20 46 1615 2973 575 609 39406 38067 630<strong>23</strong> 71349<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoa<br />
ledi<br />
5047 1037 0 5 11 703 1130 153 162 11825 19805 18781 21097<br />
Total 5978<br />
0<br />
<strong>14</strong>06<br />
6<br />
19 47 259 4900 8062 1672 1761 11373<br />
8<br />
19928<br />
9<br />
19448<br />
1<br />
20911<br />
2<br />
Table 39 above presents the statistics on grants beneficiaries are obtained from the South<br />
African Social Security Agency (SASSA). The figures indicated in the table 40 below change<br />
every month due to new approvals, births and deaths. The SASSA shows that the state<br />
resources are spend in the form of child grants in the areas that are predominantly rural.<br />
Many of these beneficiaries are either fostered, old aged, depended, need support one way<br />
or the other hence they receive different forms of grants. Issues contributing to high<br />
dependency rate on grants range from amongst others, orphans resulting from HIV/AIDS<br />
related deaths, child-headed households.
183<br />
Status Quo<br />
Social Safety Nets in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Poverty in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is endemic. As earlier sections have revealed, there is an<br />
overwhelming dependence on state-provided social security nets at present. The table below<br />
sets out the key government programmes that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households currently receive.<br />
Table 71: Beneficiaries of Key government programmes<br />
Programme<br />
% Households<br />
National School Nutrition Programme 70,3<br />
Food parcel scheme (beneficiaries all live long main transport 12,9<br />
areas)<br />
Expanded Public Works Programme 8,3<br />
Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Programme 5,1<br />
Agricultural Starter Pack Programme 5,0<br />
Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme 4,3<br />
Poverty relief programme 3,4<br />
Other government programme 2,2<br />
Land redistribution for agricultural development 1,5<br />
Unemployment Insurance Fund 1,3<br />
Land restitution programme 0,8<br />
Land care programme 0,7<br />
Beneficiary – municipality implemented food security projects 0,7<br />
Total 100<br />
Source: DoA and FIVIMS (2007b). How households fight stresses that contribute to food insecurity.<br />
This list presents interesting information about how the majority of households in<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> acquire sufficient income to meet their basic needs.<br />
Food Insecurity and Vulnerability<br />
The issue of food security cuts to the heart of the social agenda, as it involves people’s most<br />
basic needs – that of acquiring enough food to survive and live a reasonably fulfilling life.<br />
Food insecurity occurs when people are under-nourished, a state that usually arises when<br />
their food intake falls below their minimum calorie (energy) requirements. Undernourishment<br />
can be the result of several factors, including the physical unavailability of food<br />
(e.g. during a drought) or an inability to purchase food because of financial constraints.<br />
Individuals or households are said to be vulnerable to food insecurity when they are exposed<br />
to several risk factors (such as living in drought-prone area) which they may not have<br />
adequate coping mechanism for. Food insecurity is therefore an extremely revealing<br />
indicator of poverty levels in a municipality.
184<br />
However, the issue is a complex one, involving multiple factors like land availability, access<br />
to natural resources and the socio-economic circumstances of communities. The National<br />
Department of Agriculture (DoA) undertook a comprehensive livelihoods survey in the<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> area, both in 2004 and 2006 (DoA), (2006).<br />
The survey highlighted the fact that some of the areas facing the worst levels of food<br />
insecurity in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> were within the following villages:<br />
Table 72: Most food – insecure areas in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Village <strong>Municipality</strong> Score<br />
Ga-Mampa Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,86<br />
Ga-Mampuru Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,86<br />
Ga-Masha Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,85<br />
Santeng Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,85<br />
Puma Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,85<br />
Monsterlus Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,84<br />
Ngwaritsi Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,84<br />
Kgautswane Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,78<br />
Tshehlwaneng Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,70<br />
Vlakplaas Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,68<br />
Ga-Moloi Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,61<br />
Bogalatladi Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,59<br />
Monametsi Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,52<br />
Malope Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,51<br />
Mphanama Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,34<br />
Kromdraai Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,26<br />
Doornspruit Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 41,75<br />
Mamphokgo Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 41,50<br />
Tsimanyane Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 41,41<br />
Vaalbank Ephraim Mogale local <strong>Municipality</strong> 41,39<br />
Sephaku Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 39,11<br />
Small Phooko Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 37,50<br />
Magneetshoogte Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 37,46<br />
Source: DoA (2006). Livelihood survey conducted in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> of Limpopo<br />
Food insecurity within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is the result of several factors. Within the past 12<br />
months, the key shocks that communities within the <strong>District</strong> generally experienced were food<br />
price increases, petrol hikes, the growing costs of producing food, an increase in the number<br />
of individuals within households, violence, theft and illness (DoA and FIVIMS, 2007b).<br />
There’s also some evidence that ongoing water scarcity and limited economic opportunities<br />
within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> limit the ability of its residents to adapt and cope to external stresses and<br />
shocks (SEI, 2007). All these factors increase the vulnerability of communities within the<br />
<strong>District</strong>, and make it less easy for them to cope with food shortages when they occurred.
185<br />
In 2006, researchers interviewed 500 carefully-targeted households in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. They<br />
emerged with the following findings for the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
53% of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> residents skip meals because of a lack of food. More than 50% of<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Children eat less than they need to because of a shortage of food.36% of<br />
children in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> said they sometimes went to bed hungry because there was no<br />
money to buy food (HSRC, 2006).<br />
The DoA study revealed that 63% of households within the <strong>District</strong> were food insecure and<br />
that levels of hunger were on the increase (DoA and FIVIMS, 2007b). It also shows that<br />
Tubatse and Fetakgomo Local Municipalities are the most income-deprived areas in the<br />
<strong>District</strong>, and both also have the highest levels of food shortage in the area.<br />
Table 73: Pension pay points<br />
Fetakgomo Ephraim M Tubatse Elias M Makhuduthamaga Total<br />
yes 43 40 85 42 107 317<br />
no 55 15 150 5 59 284<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Out of the 740 villages that are found in the district, there are 317 pension pay points. 284<br />
villages indicated that they have no pension pay points. The implication is that they are using<br />
pension pay points in neighbouring villages. It is also interesting to note that thanks to<br />
electronic payment systems, most pensioners are no longer required to physically arrive at<br />
pension pay points to receive their grants.<br />
There is no model that has been developed for pension pay points facilities and the practice<br />
is that existing infrastructure such as shops, tribal offices and other community centres are<br />
being used as pension pay points. It makes great sense because this only happens once a<br />
month.<br />
Table 74: Pension pay points water supply<br />
Fetakgomo Ephraim<br />
M<br />
Tubatse Elias M Makhuduthamaga Total %<br />
Borehole 8 2 <strong>23</strong> 9 21 63 19%<br />
River 1 0 10 0 0 11 3%<br />
Water<br />
tanker<br />
1 4 10 0 0 15 4%<br />
Municipal 8 17 4 4 <strong>23</strong> 56 17%
186<br />
supply<br />
No<br />
supply<br />
water<br />
25 19 40 40 63 187 56%<br />
Other 0 0 2 0 0 2 1%<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
There are 317 pension pay points in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. Most of the pension<br />
pay points have no water supply (56%) and 63 (19%) are using borehole water. Only 56<br />
(17%) of the pension pay points are using municipal water.<br />
It will be difficult to make interventions regarding water supply to pension pay points simply<br />
because they are only used once a month and that there are no formal structures that are<br />
classified as pension pay points. As water infrastructure is being rolled out to villages, which<br />
will have indirect impact on water supply to villages.<br />
Table 75: Pension pay points sanitation available<br />
Fetakgom<br />
o<br />
Ephraim<br />
M Tubatse Elias M<br />
Makhuduthamag<br />
a<br />
Total<br />
pit latrines <strong>23</strong> 21 39 18 71 172<br />
vip 4 0 9 0 0 13<br />
municipal<br />
sewer 1 6 8 3 1 19<br />
no sanitation 16 15 26 29 35 121<br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong> 20<strong>14</strong><br />
It is clear from the table above that 172 pension pay points are using pit latrines as a form of<br />
sanitation. 13 are using Ventilated Improved Pit latrines. 19 are using municipal water and<br />
121 have no sanitation.<br />
Again it is very difficult to make interventions on pension pay points because they are<br />
located within the premises of private businesses, community centers and tribal authorities.<br />
The Department of social development must work jointly with the sites where pension pay<br />
outs are being to improve the situation.<br />
Table 76: Pension pay points electricity available<br />
Fetakgomo Ephraim M Tubatse Elias M Makhuduthamaga Total<br />
yes 28 25 51 32 74 210<br />
no 19 17 34 20 33 1<strong>23</strong><br />
SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>
187<br />
It has been established that 210 pension pay points have electricity compared to 1<strong>23</strong> that<br />
have no access to electricity.<br />
Challenges<br />
Shocks and stresses affecting <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households in 2006<br />
A survey also highlighted the major shocks and stresses affecting <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households<br />
in 2006. These included the fact that:<br />
· Almost one-quarter (<strong>23</strong>%) of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households suffered the death of an adult<br />
member of the households in 2006<br />
· Almost one-seventh (15%) suffered the death of a child in the household<br />
· 19% had been victims of drought<br />
· Nearly one-fifth (17%) had experienced joblessness<br />
· Food price increases had impacted on <strong>14</strong>% of households<br />
· Almost 1 in 9 (11%) lack access to clean water<br />
· Other shocks included:<br />
· Increased in household size (9%)<br />
· Serious injury or chronic illness preventing normal activities (7%)<br />
· Loss of remittances (4%)<br />
Source: (Drimie, S, undated)<br />
3.4.15. Safety and Security<br />
Introduction<br />
Combating crime forms one of the governmental strategic priorities within the medium term<br />
period. Safety and security issues remain critical in crime prevention measures in the<br />
<strong>District</strong>. Communities lack policing facilities that would assist in either reporting or combating<br />
crimes in their areas. It means the responsibility of the state to make sure that police<br />
Stations are well equipped to deal with any type of crime that might be experience among<br />
communities.<br />
Status Quo<br />
There are six magistrate courts in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>. These are Magistrate Praktiseer<br />
(next to Burgersfort), Magistrate <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (in Schoonord), magistrate Nebo in<br />
Phokwane), Magistrate Moutse, Magistrate Sempupuru and Magistrate Groblersdal<br />
(Groblersdal). These magistrate courts serve a population of 1,090,424 people.<br />
When researching <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s tourism potential as part of its 2025 Strategy, the <strong>District</strong><br />
found that crime was a weakness that could potentially undermine tourism efforts in the area<br />
(G Steyn and Associates, 2006). More recently, the <strong>District</strong>’s <strong>IDP</strong> consultations with
188<br />
communities found that the issue of crime was a recurring theme. The most important issue<br />
raised by communities and stakeholder groups (such as business, farmers, traditional<br />
leaders and civil society organizations) concern:<br />
· The presence of gangs in some communities.<br />
· The lack of electricity and proper lighting exacerbated the problem of crime.<br />
· There should be more police stations in the area as people sometimes have trouble<br />
accessing distant stations (SDM, 2007b).<br />
· Lack of satellite Police Station.<br />
Table 77: Crime Statistics in the SDM<br />
MUNICIPALITY CRIME TYPE 2008/2009 2009/2010 VARIANCE<br />
ELIAS MOTSOALEDI LM<br />
(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (Excluding 395 439 44<br />
residential premises)<br />
(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 254 <strong>23</strong>2 22<br />
(DSSC 01) Murder 64 52 12<br />
(DSSC 13) Assault common 595 475 120<br />
(PCH 06 Robbery: Aggravating 216 154 62<br />
circumstances excluding TRIO CRI<br />
(DSSC 06) Rape 263 260 3<br />
(DSSC 07) Sexual assault 20 25 -5<br />
(DSSC 33) Attempted robbery: 7 12 -5<br />
Aggravated: with fire-arm<br />
(DSSC 12) Assault GBH 852 881 -29<br />
(DSSC 34) Common robbery 194 185 9<br />
(DSSC 46) Robbery with weapon 25 40 15<br />
other than firearm<br />
PCH <strong>14</strong>9 Car jacking 43 24 19<br />
(DSSC 02) Attempted murder 86 78 8<br />
PCH <strong>14</strong>7 House Robbery 34 31 11<br />
(DSSC 35) Attempted common 1 4 -3<br />
robbery<br />
PCH <strong>14</strong>8 Business robbery 58 72 -<strong>14</strong><br />
(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (excluding 488 439 49<br />
residential premises)<br />
(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 254 <strong>23</strong>2 22<br />
(DSSC 15) Burglary (Houses) 803 785 18<br />
(DSSC 19) Theft off/from/off motor 104 138 -34<br />
vehicle<br />
(DSSC 18) Theft of motor vehicle 94 87 7<br />
and motor cycle<br />
(DSSC 40) Attempted theft of motor<br />
vehicle and motorcycle<br />
5 8 -3
189<br />
MUNICIPALITY CRIME TYPE 2008/2009 2009/2010 VARIANCE<br />
(DSSC 38) Attempted burglaries 6 11 -5<br />
business<br />
(DSSC 39) Attempted burglaries 5 3 2<br />
(Houses)<br />
Ephraim Mogale LM<br />
(DSSC 35) Attempted common 1 0 1<br />
robbery<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>9) Car jacking 3 2 1<br />
(PCH 06) Robbery: Aggravating 15 9 6<br />
circumstances excluding TRIO CRI<br />
(DSSC 06) Rape 35 27 8<br />
(DSSC 07) Sexual assault 3 1 2<br />
(DSSC 33) Attempted robbery: 4 1 3<br />
Aggravated: with fire-arm<br />
(DSSC 12) Assault GBH 118 1<strong>14</strong> 7<br />
(DSSC 01) Murder 4 7 -3<br />
(DSSC 02) Attempted murder 16 12 4<br />
(DSSC 13) Assault common 56 88 -32<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>7) House Robbery 8 12 -4<br />
(DSSC 34) Common robbery 25 38 -13<br />
(DSSC 46) Robbery with weapon 1 3 -2<br />
other than firearm<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>8) Business robbery 2 8 -6<br />
(DSSC 39) Attempted burglaries 1 0 1<br />
(Houses)<br />
(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 18 26 -8<br />
(DSSC 15) Burglary (Houses) 218 200 18<br />
(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (excluding 59 50 9<br />
residential premises)<br />
(DSSC 40) Attempted theft of motor 1 1 0<br />
vehicle and motorcycle<br />
(DSSC 18) Theft of motor vehicle 16 27 -11<br />
and motor cycle<br />
(DSSC 38) Attempted burglaries 2 1 1<br />
business<br />
(DSSC 19) Theft off/from/off motor 15 28 -13<br />
vehicle<br />
Makhuduthamaga LM<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>9) Car jacking 15 11 4<br />
(DSSC 01) Murder 63 41 22<br />
(PCH 06) Robbery: Aggravating 131 157 -26<br />
circumstances excluding TRIO CRI<br />
(DSSC 12) Assault GBH 429 426 3
190<br />
MUNICIPALITY CRIME TYPE 2008/2009 2009/2010 VARIANCE<br />
(DSSC 02) Attempted murder 56 63 -7<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>8) Business robbery 33 22 11<br />
(DSSC 34) Common robbery 89 85 4<br />
(DSSC 13) Assault common 205 216 -11<br />
(DSSC 06) Rape <strong>14</strong>7 157 -10<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>7) House Robbery 16 20 -4<br />
(DSSC 40) Attempted theft of motor 2 0 2<br />
vehicle and motorcycle<br />
(DSSC 18) Theft of motor vehicle 51 43 8<br />
and motor cycle<br />
(DSSC 15) Burglary (Houses) 303 301 2<br />
(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 91 76 15<br />
(DSSC 19) Theft off/from/off motor 46 37 24<br />
vehicle<br />
(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (excluding 306 253 53<br />
residential premises)<br />
(DSSC 07) Sexual assault 4 11 -7<br />
(DSSC 33) Attempted robbery: 5 8 -3<br />
Aggravated: with fire-arm<br />
(DSSC 38) Attempted burglaries 0 2 -2<br />
business<br />
(DSSC 46) Robbery with weapon 2 2 0<br />
other than firearm<br />
(DSSC 39) Attempted burglaries 3 1 2<br />
(Houses)<br />
(DSSC 41) Attempted theft from/off 0 1 -1<br />
motor vehicle<br />
Fetakgomo LM<br />
(DSSC 33) Attempted robbery: 2 0 2<br />
Aggravated: with fire-arm<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>8) Business robbery 7 3 4<br />
(PCH 06) Robbery: Aggravating 12 6 6<br />
circumstances excluding TRIO CRI<br />
(DSSC 07) Sexual assault 3 2 7<br />
(DSSC 01) Murder 9 7 2<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>7) House Robbery 5 4 1<br />
(DSSC 06) Rape 25 24 1<br />
(DSSC 46) Robbery with weapon 1 1 0<br />
other than firearm<br />
(DSSC 34) Common robbery 11 12 -1<br />
(DSSC 13) Assault common 29 32 -3<br />
(DSSC 02) Attempted murder 8 9 -1<br />
(DSSC 12) Assault GBH 112 136 -24
191<br />
MUNICIPALITY CRIME TYPE 2008/2009 2009/2010 VARIANCE<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>9) Car jacking 1 2 -1<br />
(DSSC 39) Attempted burglaries 1 0 1<br />
(Houses)<br />
(DSSC 15) Burglary (Houses) 54 45 10<br />
(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 47 41 6<br />
(DSSC 38) Attempted burglaries 1 1 0<br />
business<br />
(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (excluding 73 74 -1<br />
residential premises)<br />
(DSSC 19) Theft off/from/off motor 7 8 -1<br />
vehicle<br />
(DSSC 18) Theft of motor vehicle 3 5 -2<br />
and motor cycle<br />
(DSSC 40) Attempted theft of motor 0 1 -1<br />
vehicle and motorcycle<br />
Greater Tubatse LM<br />
(DSSC 07) Sexual assault 11 10 1<br />
(DSSC 02) Attempted murder 40 28 12<br />
(DSSC 01) Murder 48 25 <strong>23</strong><br />
(DSSC 13) Assault common 363 344 19<br />
(DSSC 12) Assault GBH 516 594 -78<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>8) Business robbery 20 21 -1<br />
(DSSC 34) Common robbery 125 <strong>14</strong>3 -18<br />
(DSSC 06) Rape 129 157 -28<br />
(DSSC 33) Attempted robbery: 6 4 2<br />
Aggravated: with fire-arm<br />
(PCH 06) Robbery: Aggravating 42 40 2<br />
circumstances excluding TRIO CRI<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>9) Car jacking 17 <strong>23</strong> -6<br />
(DSSC 35) Attempted common 5 4 1<br />
robbery<br />
(PCH <strong>14</strong>7) House Robbery 13 24 -11<br />
(DSSC 38) Attempted burglaries 5 5 0<br />
business<br />
(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 113 101 12<br />
(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (excluding <strong>23</strong>1 304 -73<br />
residential premises)<br />
(DSSC 15) Burglary (Houses) 364 496 -132<br />
(DSSC 39) Attempted burglaries 2 4 -2<br />
(Houses)<br />
(DSSC 40) Attempted theft of motor 2 4 -2<br />
vehicle and motorcycle<br />
(DSSC 41) Attempted theft from/off 0 2 -2
192<br />
MUNICIPALITY CRIME TYPE 2008/2009 2009/2010 VARIANCE<br />
motor vehicle<br />
(DSSC 19) Theft off/from/off motor 51 70 -19<br />
vehicle<br />
(DSSC 18) Theft of motor vehicle 46 71 -25<br />
and motor cycle<br />
(DSSC 46) Robbery with weapon<br />
other than firearm<br />
2 1 1<br />
Challenges<br />
· Revival and capacitating of Community Policing Forums (CPFs)<br />
· Establishment of additional satellite police stations in the Municipalities<br />
· Conducting crime prevention and awareness campaigns<br />
3.4.16. Transportation<br />
Introduction<br />
For goods and services to be transported throughout the <strong>District</strong>, organized transport system<br />
is required. The main transport systems are the following; busses, taxis and trucks. There<br />
are two types of bus companies which are private and public. Private are those that are<br />
owned by individuals not related to government and public are those that are owned by an<br />
organ of state or government itself.<br />
Status Quo<br />
Air Transport<br />
There are no commercial airports or air transportation in the <strong>District</strong>. Present, there are only<br />
two registered airfields in the towns of Groblersdal and Marble Hall. They are used as<br />
emergency airfields. They are utilized mainly by the business and tourism sectors, as well as<br />
local farmers wishing to spray their cultivated fields. There is also an air strip in Elandskraal<br />
in the Ephraim Mogale <strong>Municipality</strong>, which is not maintained.<br />
Public Transport<br />
According to the <strong>District</strong>’s integrated Transport Plan, the most common forms of public<br />
passenger transport are the buses and taxes. The taxi industry determine its routes largely<br />
by looking at factors like the location of towns and villages, dominant economic activities in<br />
the area and employed status within the district.
193<br />
Transport routes in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> are often limited by deteriorating roads conditions as well as<br />
local storm water problems caused by rainy season. The following are the findings of the<br />
review of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> Current Public Transport Record (CPTR) and Integrated<br />
Transport Plan (ITP) in 2007. The report covered an overview of what is involved in public<br />
transport in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> with regard to facilities, the capacity<br />
utilization of ranks and routes, the waiting times of passengers and vehicles, the operational<br />
vehicle and the number of trips made per operational vehicle. The facility surveys were<br />
conducted at taxi ranks, bus terminals and train stations.<br />
The facility survey conducted indicated that the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> does not<br />
have commuter rail services.<br />
There are three bus terminals in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> and have a total of 82<br />
taxi facilities of which more than 75 per cent are informal.<br />
190 (approximately 50% outwards-bound) taxi routes in the SDM: 15% are in the Elias<br />
Motsoaledi LM, 3% in Fetakgomo LM, 17% in Ephraim Mogale LM, 43% in the Greater<br />
Tubatse LM and 22% in Makhuduthamaga LM.<br />
Of the subsidized bus routes in the SDM, 57% are in the Elias Motsoaledi LM and 43% in<br />
the Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
The main findings obtained from the analysis of the route utilization are that there is a vast<br />
oversupply of taxis on most routes in the SDM.<br />
The route utilization survey noted <strong>14</strong>62 taxis in the SDM area. Furthermore 1372 taxis were<br />
noted in the Elias Motsoaledi LM, 287 in Fetakgomo LM, 530 in Greater Tubatse LM and<br />
1083 in Makhuduthamaga LM.<br />
There are 28 buses in operation on the subsidized routes in the SDM area. There are<br />
metered-taxi activities in the Greater Tubatse LM, Light Delivery Vehicle (LDVs) are utilized<br />
for learners’ trips as well as the areas where the quality of the road is not good.<br />
Bus Industry<br />
There are two different types of bus operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>, namely:<br />
A. Subsidized operators<br />
B. Non-subsidized operators<br />
i) Subsidized Bus Operators<br />
Table 78: All subsidized bus operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> are shown in the table below:<br />
SUBSIDIZED BUS OPERATORS IN THE SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />
Subsidized Bus Operators<br />
Operational Area
194<br />
Great North Transport<br />
Great North Transport<br />
Source: Great North Transport<br />
Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
ii) Non Subsidized Operators<br />
There are four (4) non-subsidized bus operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> Municipal area.<br />
Since these buses are not used for commuter transport, no detailed information was<br />
obtained about these operations. The distribution of these operators with regard to the<br />
respective local municipalities in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is shown in the table<br />
below.<br />
Table 79: Distribut ion of Non-Subsidized Bus Operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> Municipa l<br />
Area:<br />
DISTRIBUTION OF NO-SUBSIDIZED BUS OPERATORS IN THE SEKHUKHUNE<br />
DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />
Operator Location of Operator Type of Operations<br />
Great North Transport Greater Tubatse Casual and scholar passengers<br />
Mahlangu Bus Services Greater Tubatse Mine and scholar passengers<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Express Greater Tubatse Mine passengers<br />
Thembalethu Bus Company Greater Tubatse Mine and scholar passengers<br />
Challenges<br />
· There is oversupply of taxis on most of routes in SDM<br />
· Taxis fighting for the use of certain routes<br />
· Light delivery vehicles used for the transportation of learners<br />
· Deterioration of road infrastructure<br />
· Lack of facilities for heavy vehicles<br />
· Inadequate signage<br />
· Lack of alternative routes for trucks<br />
3.5. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />
3.5.1. Introduction<br />
The attainment of the vision set out in this <strong>IDP</strong> will ultimately be determined by the state of<br />
the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy. The Expanded Public Works Programme has been earmarked as<br />
one of the other programmes that will fastracking job creation in the district. Other sections<br />
of this chapter have already painted a picture of the spatial, demographic and infrastructural<br />
challenges to economic development in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
This section turns its lens on the principal characteristics of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Economy more<br />
specifically. It identifies the municipal economy’s main features, describes its dominant<br />
sectors and concludes with assessment of its competitive advantage. It is therefore an
195<br />
important profile that plays a substantial role in defining the defining the development<br />
strategies, projects and overarching socio-economic plans of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy is a curious mixture of overwhelmingly negative features (such<br />
as the highest unemployment rate in Limpopo) and positive opportunities (like the enormous<br />
mining potential within the area). Plotting an economic development path therefore requires<br />
a careful assessment of the current economic reality in the district.<br />
3.5.2. Status Quo<br />
The Structure of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Economy<br />
Conventional wisdom has it that agriculture; mining and tourism are the three leading sectors<br />
in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy. Official statistics, however, paint a slightly different picture of<br />
the <strong>District</strong> economy being dominated by community services, mining and trade. It must be<br />
noted that it is very difficult to find accurate data for the local level in South Africa.<br />
Those data-gathering exercises that do exist often yield vastly different accounts of local<br />
realities. Most public sector plans and <strong>IDP</strong>’s however, draw on Stats SA data even whilst<br />
recognizing some of its limitations. The table below is drawn on from Stats SA data sets out<br />
the main sectoral contribution to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s Gross Geographic Product (GGP).<br />
Table 80: Key sectoral contributions to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s GGP (1995-2000)<br />
Sector 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000<br />
Agriculture and 11,472 10,828 9,060 11,607 11,295 12,074<br />
forestry<br />
Mining 304,975 340,825 385,950 433,274 447,409 510,348<br />
Manufacturing 30,564 35,650 45,420 46,311 52,220 60,532<br />
Electricity and 39,849 46,002 59,635 76,797 84,431 97,098<br />
Water<br />
Construction 10,717 13,416 <strong>14</strong>,707 13,440 12,938 10,888<br />
Trade and 215,203 253,344 284,010 363,9<strong>23</strong> 409,551 450,398<br />
Catering<br />
TPT and 20,026 56,029 70,793 74,507 77,737 80,708<br />
Communication<br />
Financial and 5,081 5,348 5,630 6,255 8,979 9,529<br />
business services<br />
Community 799,430 808,253 861,297 1,192,342 1,291,970 1,361,607<br />
Services<br />
Total 1,467,317 1,569,695 1,736,502 2,218,456 2,396,530 2,593,182<br />
Source: Stats SA (2001)<br />
What the data reveals is that in 2000, the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy depended largely on public<br />
sector funding with community services being a major factor in the area.
196<br />
The three main contributors to GGP were community services (52%), mining (20%) and<br />
trade (17%). Despite these findings, the <strong>District</strong> has very consciously chosen to explore the<br />
potential of mining, agriculture and tourism as key contributors to the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy<br />
up to the year 2025. This is also in recognition of the fact that thriving local economies<br />
should not depend overly on public sector injections of income. These three key sectors, as<br />
well as others highlighted in the table above, are presented in the next sub-section.<br />
Revenue Flows<br />
Figure 36: Main Revenue Flow<br />
First, however, this section turn it lens on another salient features of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
economy – the main revenue flows into and out of the municipal economy. This is captured<br />
graphically in the figure below.<br />
The main sectors are indicated as green blocks within the orange oval, depicts the boundary<br />
of the focal area. The arrows indicate the main source of external income (revenue and<br />
investment) flowing into and leaking out of the economy.<br />
What is striking about this picture is that the bulk of revenue flows directly out of the<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy, as many goods and services are supplied from outside the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
As later sections of this <strong>IDP</strong> will reveal, this reality has led to the <strong>District</strong> prioritizing certain<br />
interventions that will see the retention of revenue within the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
Key Economic Sectors
197<br />
As the previous section highlighted, the pre-dominance of certain sectors in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
economy is somewhat contested. This section provides an outlined of the sectors that the<br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has decided it is of Strategic importance to its sustained economic<br />
growth. These sectors are mining, agriculture, tourism, retail and trade, manufacturing,<br />
construction, transport and logistics, financial and business services as well as the public<br />
sector. Collectively, these provide a comprehensive picture of the potential inherent in the<br />
municipal economy.<br />
Mining<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> cuts across the north-eastern part of the Bushveld Complex, an<br />
immense geological structure that contains the largest reserves of platinum group metals<br />
(PGM) in the world. PGMs are a family of 6 metals – platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium,<br />
osmium and ruthenium. The first three of these are the main metals used in catalysts. Nickel,<br />
chrome, vanadium, titanium, iron, copper, cobalt, granite and asbestos are some of the other<br />
deposits found in that belt.<br />
Although statistics may vary, most would agree that mining is a key contributor to<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s GGP – and a sector with enormous potential for the immediate future. Modern<br />
mining has been practiced in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> land for well over a century, and typically involved<br />
the exploitation of andalusite, asbestos, chromite and platinum deposits. What is striking<br />
about previous boots of mining activity in the area, however, is how changing commodity<br />
prices affected the opening, closing and occasionally reopening of mines. When prices rose,<br />
new exploration and development took place in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> mining sector. Conversely,<br />
when prices fell, mines in the area were forced to close.<br />
Current Mining Activities<br />
Mining’s contribution to GGP in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is estimated at between 15-20%, depending on<br />
the source of the statistics. Within the <strong>District</strong> itself, the sector contributes most to the GGPs<br />
of Makhuduthamaga (22, 8%) in 2000), Fetakgomo (32, 6% in 2000) and Tubatse (36, 6 in<br />
2000) (Goode, 2006). These figures are likely to have changes in recent years, however.<br />
The major mining activity in the <strong>District</strong> occurs within the Dilokong Corridor, which stretches<br />
largely across Tubatse and Fetakgomo. Elias Motsoaledi, Makhuduthamaga and Ephraim<br />
Mogale have relatively low levels of mining activities (SDM, 2007a).<br />
It is estimated that mining grew at an annual rate of 5.4% from 1996 – 2001 (Goode, 2006),<br />
a comparatively high growth rate which bodes well for the future. According to the<br />
Department of Minerals and Energy, there were 17 operating mines in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> area in 2006 (Goode, 2006). These include a significant number of platinum mines in<br />
the area.<br />
The table below sets out the main existing (operating) and planned platinum mines in the<br />
<strong>District</strong>.
198<br />
Table 81: Operating and Projected Platinum Mines <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
LIST OF MINES IN THE GREATER TUBATSE MUNICIPLAITY<br />
MINE NAME TYPE OF ORE LOCALITY CONTACT<br />
DETAILS<br />
STATUS<br />
Dwarsrivier Chrome Shaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 5300/1 Operating<br />
Helena(Xstrata) Platinum Dithamaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 5000 Operating<br />
/3133<br />
Thorncliff(Xstrata) Platinum Shaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 6750 Operating<br />
Mototolo(Xstrata) Platinum Shaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 6697 Operating<br />
/87<br />
Lion<br />
Platinum Steelpoort 013 <strong>23</strong>0 5064 Operating<br />
Ferrochrome(Xstrata)<br />
Marula Platinum Winnershoek 013 2<strong>14</strong> 6000/ Operating<br />
Farm<br />
013 2<strong>14</strong> 6005<br />
Twickenham Platinum Maotsi 013 <strong>23</strong>1 9127 Operating<br />
Dooringbosch<br />
Chrome Makgemeng 013 <strong>23</strong>0 7001 Operating<br />
(Samancor)<br />
Tubatse F/Cr(Samancor) Chrome Steelpoort 013 <strong>23</strong>0 8335 Operating<br />
Modikwa Platinum M/Shoek 013 <strong>23</strong>0 2044 Operating<br />
Tweefontein(Samancor) Chrome Shaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 7001 Operating<br />
Lannex Chrome Steelpoort 013 <strong>23</strong>0 7001<br />
Two Rivers Platinum Shaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 2800 Operating<br />
Lwala(Samancor) Chrome Manyaka Prospect<br />
Asa Metals/Dilokong Chrome Maroga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 7785 Operating<br />
Box 169/B Fort<br />
1150<br />
Mkasselmin@A<br />
sametals.Co.Za<br />
Rhino Minerals Andalusite Modubeng 013 216 3100 Operating<br />
Phokathaba Australia Platinum M/Shoek 0795087519 Prospect<br />
Spitzkop Platinum Steelpoort 011 463 0050 Prospect<br />
Grootboom/Boynton Platinum Steelpoort 012 661 4138 Prospect<br />
Annesley Havecraft Andalusite Segorong 013 216 2913 Operating<br />
De Brochen Platinum Operating<br />
Elephant´S River Granite Granite Tjate 083 653 9724 Operating<br />
Mooihoek Chrome Maroga Prospect<br />
Nkwe Platinum M/Shoek Prospect<br />
Sebatakgomo Platinum Tjate Prospect<br />
Saringa Slate K/Tswane Operating<br />
LIST OF MINES IN FETAKGOMO MUNICIPLAITY
199<br />
MINE NAME TYPE OF ORE LOCALITY CONTACT<br />
DETAILS<br />
Elepha is River Granite Pty Granite<br />
Ltd<br />
Sefateng Chrome Chrome 015 291 3961<br />
079495<strong>14</strong>41<br />
Bokoni Platinum Mine Platinum 015 620 000/152<br />
083 4557882<br />
STATUS<br />
Operating<br />
Operating<br />
Operating<br />
ELIAS MOTSOALEDI MUNICIPALITY<br />
Blue Ridge Platinum Groblersdal Non-<br />
Operational<br />
Sheba’s Ridge Platinum Groblersdal Bankable<br />
Feasibility<br />
Study<br />
Maphoch Mine Rossenekal Operating<br />
In addition to the list above, there are also a number of PGM prospects in or around the<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area.<br />
Prospects for the future<br />
Much attention has been given recently to the anticipated platinum mining explosion in<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. There are areas where the new platinum mines are concentrated:<br />
· The Dilokong or Burgersfort/Steelpoort corridor<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has once commissioned an investigation into potential global<br />
demand for the key minerals found in its jurisdiction. The results are presented in the table<br />
below:<br />
Table 82: Market prospects for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> minerals<br />
Mineral Commercial Uses Future Prospects<br />
Chrome and - Stainless steel production - The primary determinant of global<br />
Ferrochrome - Metallurgical applications demand for chrome is stainless<br />
- Refractory, foundry and<br />
chemical industries<br />
steel production (which has grown<br />
by 6% p.a. since 1998)<br />
- There’s currently strong demand<br />
from high Chinese stainless steel<br />
production<br />
- However, excessive supply of<br />
chrome could push down prices in<br />
the future.<br />
Vanadium - Steel making - Because 90% of vanadium
200<br />
Mineral Commercial Uses Future Prospects<br />
misused in steel making, the word<br />
vanadium market is firmly tied to<br />
the steel market<br />
- In 2004, world steel production<br />
exceeded 1 billion tons for the first<br />
time in history.<br />
- Between 2000-2004, steel<br />
production increased by 6% p.a.<br />
globally, especially from China.<br />
- Positive short-term prospects for<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> vanadium, especially<br />
given potential Chinese demand.<br />
- A possible threat could arise if<br />
procedures seek substitute if<br />
vanadium prices become too high.<br />
Platinum<br />
Group Metals<br />
- Automotive exhaust<br />
catalyst (auto catalyst)<br />
- Other Industrial uses<br />
(other catalysts, turbine<br />
blades, Biomedical uses,<br />
coins, PC Hard Disks,<br />
etc.)<br />
- Jewellery production<br />
Limestone - Used in cement and steel<br />
making<br />
Dimension<br />
stone<br />
- Red and Black granite<br />
used in home décor /<br />
architecture<br />
- Because of the nature of its<br />
commercial usage, global demand<br />
is strongly linked to environmental<br />
standards re vehicle emissions<br />
- Demand for PGMs has continued<br />
to grow over the years, however –<br />
and there is currently a healthy<br />
outlook for this type of mining<br />
- Jewellery demand is also expected<br />
to rise<br />
- Increased construction activity will<br />
result in sustained demand for<br />
cement<br />
- Hence, there’s a positive outlook<br />
for limestone mining in<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
- World demand for dimension stone<br />
has been growing steadily<br />
- However, the South African market<br />
isn’t faring well because of<br />
currency depreciation and<br />
unpredictable demand (because<br />
architects choose different<br />
finishes)<br />
Coal - Energy - There are better sources outside<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> that currently supply<br />
the domestic and international<br />
markets
201<br />
Mineral Commercial Uses Future Prospects<br />
- Hence, coal mining isn’t a viable<br />
prospect for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
- However, there’s limited potential<br />
for the extraction of coal bed<br />
methane as an energy source for<br />
the region (needs further<br />
investigation, through)<br />
Source: adapted from Goode (2006) Scoping paper on the mining sector in the<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
There are, in summary, a number of factors that could affect <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s mining industry<br />
negatively in the future. These include drops in global demands for the minerals produced in<br />
the area, continued water scarcity in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> and the increasing mechanization of<br />
platinum mining industry in the future. The latter will affect the potential employment<br />
opportunities generated by mining industry in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, regardless of whether the area<br />
contains significant mineral deposits or not.<br />
Beneficiation Opportunities and Value Chain Analysis<br />
It is important to note that PGM ores are low in value (possibly around 30 cents/kg). it is also<br />
difficult to extract the valuable metals from them without suitable and expensive equipment.<br />
Some estimate place the value of the ordinary (just mined) platinum ore at only 13% of the<br />
refined material (Goode and Granville, 2006).<br />
At present, there is no base-metal or platinum smelter in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area. The nearest<br />
smelter is Amplats’ Polokwane Smelter. Recent research done for the <strong>District</strong>’s 2025<br />
Development Strategy included interviews with key mining companies on the possibility of<br />
them building smelter within the <strong>District</strong>. This was based on research projections that the<br />
total PGM production in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> in 2015 would be 2, 900, 00 oz per annum – a figure<br />
that would justify the installation of a new smelter in the area (Goode and Granville, 2006). It<br />
would appear, however, that most mining companies were not planning to build a new<br />
smelter in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area.<br />
Job Creation<br />
Since the mid-1980, the mining labour market has changed significantly as the sector has<br />
become more knowledge-intensive. As a result, overall mining employment has been<br />
decreasing gradually. Goode and Granville (2006) estimate that platinum mining in the<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> will generate the following jobs until 2015:<br />
Table 83: Projected employment in platinum mining in/near <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>
202<br />
Production (K0oz)<br />
Employees<br />
2010 2,028 36,427<br />
2011 2,266 39,252<br />
2012 2,495 41,666<br />
<strong>2013</strong> 2,597 41,806<br />
20<strong>14</strong> 2,693 41,786<br />
2015 2,856 42,730<br />
Source: Goode, R and Granville, A (2006). Mining expansion and employment in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> land: Expectations and<br />
Impediments.<br />
The agriculture sector is an important contributor to employment, but a relatively marginal<br />
contributor to the aggregate GGP, estimated at 9, 7% (SDM, 2007a). According to farmers in<br />
the area, the main reason why the sector doesn’t contribute more to GGP is because of<br />
water scarcity. Other reasons could include the combined effects of land claims, which<br />
creates uncertainty and discourages further investment, as well as the low growth of global<br />
commodities.<br />
Agriculture in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> is a mixture of both commercial and subsistence<br />
farming. As indicated in the earlier spatial profile, subsistence farming tends to dominate<br />
land use in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
Commercial agriculture in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> tends to be concentrated in two areas:<br />
- The South-Western part of the <strong>District</strong> (near Groblersdal and Marble Hall)<br />
- The Eastern section of the <strong>District</strong> (near Burgersfort and Ohrigstad)<br />
Number of jobs created through LED Initiatives in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>, as part of a<br />
provincial report<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Number of jobs<br />
created through<br />
LED initiatives<br />
09/10<br />
Number of<br />
jobs created<br />
through LED<br />
initiatives<br />
10/11<br />
Number of<br />
jobs created<br />
through LED<br />
initiatives<br />
11/12<br />
Vhembe 57 2615 918<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 1946 4536 9038<br />
Capricorn 2126 3127 6522
203<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Number of jobs<br />
created through<br />
LED initiatives<br />
09/10<br />
Number of<br />
jobs created<br />
through LED<br />
initiatives<br />
10/11<br />
Number of<br />
jobs created<br />
through LED<br />
initiatives<br />
11/12<br />
Mopani 4<strong>23</strong>3 7171 (Giyani<br />
excluded)<br />
1761<br />
Waterberg <strong>14</strong><strong>23</strong> 1215 643<br />
PROVINCIAL<br />
AGGREGATE<br />
9785 18 664 18 882<br />
Source: Limpopo Provincial Government Report <strong>2013</strong>, submitted to national COGTA Department<br />
Commercial agriculture<br />
Over the past 5 to 10 years, farmers in the area have faced mounted difficulties with falling<br />
commodity prices and rising input costs. Despite this, agriculture’s contribution to GGP<br />
continues to be roughly 10% and, in 2001, provided 16% of the formal employment within<br />
the <strong>District</strong> (Womiwu Rural Development, 2006a).<br />
There are two major areas of commercial cultivation:<br />
- The Loskop scheme<br />
- The Ohrigstad scheme<br />
(a1) The Loskop scheme<br />
The towns of Groblersdal and Marble Hall are found in the Loskop Valley. The commercial<br />
agricultural schemes in the valley are serviced by the Loskop Dam, built in 1938 especially<br />
for this purpose. In addition to the Loskop scheme, there are 5 smaller schemes within the<br />
Loskop agriculture area:<br />
- Moosrivier scheme<br />
- Hereford scheme<br />
- Olifants River scheme<br />
- Elands River scheme
204<br />
- Selons River scheme<br />
Collectively, these contribute significantly to commercial agriculture in the area. The past 10<br />
years have placed Loskop farmers under increasing pressure as arising input costs, a<br />
stronger local currency, lower commodity prices and external competition have all taken their<br />
toll. One of the responses on the part of local farmers has been to diversify the crops they<br />
produce. The collapse of the once lucrative tobacco industry has also pressured farmers in<br />
the area to look at different options. As a result, there has been a growing emphasis placed<br />
on establishing permanent crops, such as citrus and table grapes, in the area.<br />
Main crops in Loskop<br />
Tobacco, Wheat, Cotton, Soya beans, Citrus, Paprika, Pumpkin, Peas, Commercial<br />
vegetables, Seed maize, Commercial maize, Table grapes, Dry beans, Watermelons.<br />
The <strong>District</strong> currently has a competitive advantage in a number of crops, including table<br />
grapes, citrus and vegetables for processing (Womiwu Rural Development, 2006b). This can<br />
be maintained if the <strong>District</strong> promotes processing and other value-adding activities for these<br />
products.<br />
Emerging and Small-Scale Agriculture<br />
Almost 70% of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> farmers are subsistence farmers. This group of farmers<br />
engages extensively in both livestock and crop farming.<br />
In the middle-1990s, three Farmers Support Programmes were providing assistance to<br />
about 16,000 small-scale maize farmers in Phokoane, Ndebele and Sterkspruit. These<br />
programmes have been discontinued (Wmiwu) Rural Development, 2006a) and subsistence<br />
agricultural production in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has generally dropped significantly (DoA, 2006).<br />
The two areas with the highest potential for small-scale farmers are the higher rainfall<br />
dryland areas, as well as the Olifants River Irrigation Scheme. The latter consist of 42<br />
government-assisted schemes allocated to approximately 3,000 farmers, and has been<br />
identified as part of the Limpopo DoA’s Revitalization of smallholder schemes. The table<br />
below captures the schemes that will be revitalized under the initiative in the first 2 years:<br />
The future of agriculture in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is however, impeded by a number of factors. These<br />
include water scarcity, distorted land ownership patterns, a growing number of land claims,<br />
Limited support services and inadequate infrastructure and services. The huge disparities<br />
between the commercial and subsistence farming worlds may also eventually cause some<br />
social tension. The other area of potential tension lies in conflicting social and economic<br />
demands for water, an increasingly scarce resource in the district. It is a tension that will<br />
need to be mediated through future <strong>IDP</strong> processes.
205<br />
Despite these potential difficulties, opportunities abound for agriculture in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, and<br />
the sector is likely to play a dominant role in the district’s forthcoming 2025 Strategy. It is<br />
also a critical element of provincial economic strategy.<br />
Agriculture and the LEGDP<br />
There are two identified agricultural cluster within the LEGDP:<br />
- Red meat cluster<br />
- Horticulture cluster<br />
Both have implications for future development in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>. The red meat<br />
cluster could be developed best in the Phokoane/Ndebele area, and the horticultural cluster<br />
in the Groblersdal/Ephraim Mogale area.<br />
Agricultural activities with the most potential in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Recent research done for the <strong>District</strong>’s 2025 Strategy identified 6 areas that held the most<br />
potential for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> agriculture. These are:<br />
- Crops associated with the bio-fuels industry (soya, sorghum, maize, groundnuts,<br />
sunflower, etc.)<br />
- Dryland farmer support programme focusing on maize, sorghum and guar<br />
- Farmer support programme focusing on cattle and goat farming<br />
- General farmer support programmes looking at the unutilized capacity of small<br />
community projects in the <strong>District</strong><br />
- Commercial and horticultural production, especially in terms of cluster development<br />
in the high potential areas of Groblersdal/Ephraim Mogale and<br />
Ohrigstad/Watervals - Spekboom (focused on value-adding activities (Womiwu Rural<br />
Development, 2006b).<br />
Tourism<br />
Nationally, there has been a major shift in the tourism sector away from strategies that rely<br />
on physical attributes towards those that emphasize competitive behavior. This notion is<br />
taken forward in the key provincial documents, such as the LEGDP and the provincial<br />
Tourism Plan, which call for the development of spatially concentrated cluster that have<br />
unique competitive success in a particularly field.<br />
Within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> context, a number of clusters have been identified by Provincial<br />
Tourism Strategy as offering significant tourism potential. These include:<br />
- Themed routes for special interest groups
206<br />
- Family recreation for neighbours and local residents<br />
- Business tourism<br />
- Agri-tourism<br />
Current tourism infrastructure<br />
Tourism has been identified as one of the major growth sectors in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />
The <strong>District</strong>’s Tourism Strategy that was adopted in 2005 indicates that there are an<br />
estimated 84 accommodation facilities offering 2.627 beds throughout <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. The<br />
sector also employs about 962 persons.<br />
Table 84: Accommodation facilities in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Municipal area No of No of Occupancy Turnover Staff<br />
facilities beds rate (%)<br />
employed<br />
Tubatse 20 1,278 67 47,200,000 432<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 24 577 59 20,200,000 222<br />
Ephraim Mogale 29 677 54 <strong>23</strong>,000,000 260<br />
Fetakgomo 1 20 n/a 200,000 12<br />
Makhuduthamaga 6 75 62 2,600,000 36<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 81 2,627 62 93 200,000 962<br />
Source: SDM (2005). <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Tourism Development Strategy-Status Quo Report<br />
The potential of this sector could be more fully exploited if multiplier effects are taken more<br />
advantage of.<br />
· Flagship Tourism Projects<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area has a number of potential tourism attractions, some of which have<br />
been captured as flagship projects under the district’s new tourism plan. The area hosts the<br />
scenic Flag Boshielo Dam area, for example, as well as the adjoining Schuinsdraal nature<br />
Reserve, Potlake Nature Reserve and the Maleoskop resort and conservancy.<br />
· Tourism Anchor Projects in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
The <strong>District</strong>’s Tourism Development Strategy recommends the following 5 anchor projects:<br />
- Flag Boshielo Cluster<br />
- Tjate Heritage site<br />
- Main Entrance gate and route Development<br />
- Klein Drakensberg Escarpment<br />
- De Hoop Dam to Mapoch Recreation Complex<br />
Future Growth
207<br />
According to the <strong>District</strong>’s LED Strategy reviewed in 2007 (SDM, 2007a), tourism in<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is still in its infancy with limited offerings and low service standards. It does,<br />
however, have the potential to diversify the economy in a sustainable and labour intensive<br />
manner. These niches need investigation and development of destinations, into compelling<br />
attractions. Growth in tourism is currently driven mainly by business visitors in the public and<br />
mining sector activities and agriculture provides an opportunity to grow the sector creatively<br />
with unique attractions.<br />
Recent research done for the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s 2025 Strategy also made a few<br />
predictions about the employment-generating potential of the tourism sector in the area. The<br />
employment potential of some of the key project is captured in the table below.<br />
At present, however, there are very few institutions serving the tourism industry in<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. These include; The Roosenekal Tourism Publicity association is found within<br />
Elias Motsoaledi <strong>Municipality</strong> and, amongst other things, stages the Arum Lily festival. Other<br />
role-players connected to the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> tourism industry include the Limpopo Department<br />
of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism (LEDET), and Limpopo<br />
Tourism Agency (LTA).<br />
The future growth of the tourism industry is further impeded by infrastructural and service<br />
delivery constraints in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. These include poor roads, telecommunications,<br />
electricity and water supply.<br />
Retail and Wholesale Trade and Services<br />
According to Stats SA data presented earlier in this section the trade and Service is also a<br />
major contributor to GGP (17%). The sector has shown a significant increase in its<br />
contribution to the aggregate GGP. It has registered a high growth rate and remains a<br />
relatively large component of the local economy. The sector responds predominantly to local<br />
markets. Growth in these sectors could be explained by increased local spending power as a<br />
result of growth in the public and mining sectors.<br />
Formal trade is mostly restricted to the major town such as Marble Hall, Groblersdal and<br />
Burgersfort, while informal trade takes place throughout the rural parts of the <strong>District</strong>,<br />
including the numerous villages.<br />
Manufacturing<br />
Manufacturing is a relatively small sector within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy. The most<br />
common manufacturing activities include the making of sand bricks, windows, doors and<br />
steel frames. These activities respond to local demand from the infrastructural development<br />
associated with housing projects, roads rehabilitation, as well as agriculture and mining<br />
activities.
208<br />
There is potential for growth in manufacturing if effective links are created to exploit<br />
opportunities resulting from the mining and public sector infrastructure spending.<br />
Construction<br />
The construction sector is also a relatively small, but important, contributor to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s<br />
GGP. It is linked to development within all the other sectors of the economy. This includes<br />
the demand for the construction of public sector infrastructure 9housing, roads, provision of<br />
basic services, the De Hoop dam and the pipeline network) – a trend that is large and<br />
growing. Most construction work is currently sourced from outside the <strong>District</strong>. This poses<br />
the challenge for local residents to either become competitive enough or partner with already<br />
the challenge for local residents to either become competitive enough or partner with already<br />
competitive enough or partner with already competitive contractors to share in this growth.<br />
Transport, Logistics and Communications<br />
The transport, logistics and communications sector is becoming significantly more important<br />
in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, especially with gradual increase in activities of other economic sectors. The<br />
anticipated expansion in mining, for instance, offers tremendous opportunity for passenger<br />
transport and material. Similarly, public sector infrastructural development also demands the<br />
movement of huge amounts of material and people.<br />
Financial, Business and Real Estate Services<br />
The financial and business services sector is an important contributor when analyzed in the<br />
context of the <strong>District</strong> economy. The contributor is between 10 to 12%. It is also important<br />
because it facilitates the development of other economic sectors in the area. At present, the<br />
majority of these services are concentrated within the economic nodes of Groblersdal and<br />
marble Hall town.<br />
Public Sector<br />
The government sector employs 16% of the total <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> population, provides public<br />
services and invests in development work. Besides the employment created, income<br />
generated and spent in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, the public sector also has a key role to play in the<br />
economy in the way decisions are taken. The delivery of the public infrastructure budget for<br />
example, could be prioritized to unlock economic potential, in the absence of which,<br />
opportunities could be wasted. However, public expenditure in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> far exceeds its<br />
ability to raise tax revenue. The inference is that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s public spending is actually<br />
mainly paid for by the rest of the country.<br />
Development corridors in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>
209<br />
A number of development corridors have the potential to promote economic growth within<br />
the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> (SDM, undated, b). These are described below.<br />
Dilokong Corridor<br />
The Dilokong (Platinum) Primary Corridor is an extremely important corridor to both<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> and the province. It correlates largely with the R37 road, which runs from<br />
Polokwane through Lebowakgomo to Burgersfort.<br />
The Dilokong corridor is characterized by booming mining activities alongside its trajectory.<br />
Projected mining expansion in the area is likely to boost the importance of this initiative as<br />
well. Tubatse benefits the most from developments in this corridor, with lesser benefits<br />
accruing to Fetakgomo as well.<br />
The Dilokong Corridor also encompasses a number of growth points including Atok (within<br />
Fetakgomo), Mecklenburg and Burgersfort. The Burgersfort cluster includes a provincial<br />
growth point (Burgersfort), <strong>District</strong> growth point (Steelpoort) and municipal growth point<br />
(Driekop). The remaining settlements which forms part of the Burgersfort cluster, have been<br />
classified as population concentration points. These settlements are also important in the<br />
development of the area mainly because they have residential development potential for the<br />
mines (SDM, undated, b).<br />
The N11 Corridor<br />
The primary N11 corridor runs from Botswana through Potgietersrus down to Groblersdal<br />
and onwards to Middleburg on the western side of the <strong>District</strong>. It serves as a major transport<br />
route in the western part of the <strong>District</strong>, particularly for transporting agricultural produce. The<br />
road conditions along this corridor are fairly poor, however.<br />
Marble Hall and Groblersdal fall within the N11 corridor. These towns have also been<br />
classified as provincial growth points because of their important service function to the<br />
surrounding communities and their linkages to these communities as well as agricultural<br />
sector (SDM, undated, b).<br />
Jane Furse Corridor<br />
The mainly residential development on the road between Lebowakgomo via Ga-Masemola<br />
and Ga-Phaahla to Jane Furse and Glen Cowie/Phokwane can be classified as a secondary<br />
development corridor within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. This corridor does not form part of SDI route, but<br />
is a corridor in terms of the nature and extent of the large population concentration in the<br />
area.<br />
This secondary corridor can play a significant role in the development of mining. It extends<br />
from Burgersfort via Steelpoort to Stoffberg. A number of mining activities are taking place at
210<br />
the moment along the corridor. Proper infrastructure will be required to facilitate mining<br />
expansion, however. Proper development of this corridor will stimulate economic<br />
development of the surrounding areas. It will mostly cater for the transportation of goods and<br />
services.<br />
Other Corridors<br />
The following tertiary corridors where identified within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>:<br />
- From Burgersfort to Penge<br />
- From Marble Hall to Siyabuswa<br />
- From Groblersdal to Stoffberg<br />
- From Marble Hall the Olifants to Atok<br />
- From Jane Furse to Nchabeleng<br />
(SDM, undated)<br />
These corridors have various clusters, which are primarily classified as population<br />
concentration points, including municipal growth points. They also connect various villages<br />
with different growth points. They are strategically distributed and links well with the primary<br />
and secondary corridor identified above. Some of the identified tertiary corridors need<br />
upgrading in order to stimulate economic growth in these clustered villages and municipal<br />
growth points.<br />
Local Economic Development Snapshots per <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Each local <strong>Municipality</strong>’s economy within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has distinctive<br />
characteristics of its own which collectively contribute to the overall economic make-up of the<br />
area. This section presents a snapshot of these local economies.<br />
Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Greater Tubatse is a strong economic centre within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>, primarily<br />
because of its mining sector. Mining is indeed the major source of employment and<br />
economic growth in Tubatse. Minerals found here include platinum, chrome, vanadium,<br />
andalusite, slica and magnetite. The mining sector is currently growing rapidly in the area<br />
and the town (Burgersfort) is now one of the fastest growing towns in the country.<br />
Retail, trade, services and agriculture also contribute to the Greater Tubatse economy and<br />
are major employers. Agricultural products cultivated in this area include citrus, vegetables,<br />
corn and maize. Livestock farming include cattle, goats and game.<br />
Makhuduthamaga local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
The Makhuduthamaga <strong>Municipality</strong> promotes agriculture, tourism and mining as the key<br />
growth sectors. There are number of mining exploration exercise that are taking place within
211<br />
the municipality. If mining does indeed prove feasible, it will have an added impetus on the<br />
creation of much needed jobs in particular and the growth of the economy in general.<br />
The decision to locate the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> in Jane Furse will provide substantial growth<br />
impetus, perhaps at the cost of Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. Furthermore, the<br />
agricultural and tourism potential of the municipality have yet to be exploited fully. At the<br />
moment limited forms of agricultural and tourism activities are taking place.<br />
Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
The availability of irrigation water from the closely situated Loskop dam makes Ephraim<br />
Mogale a thriving agricultural area. Ephraim Mogale is known for its extensive irrigation<br />
farming which includes cotton (Ephraim Mogale has one of the biggest Cotton production<br />
Centres in the Southern Hemisphere), wheat, citrus, table grapes and vegetables. The<br />
extensive vegetable cultivation provides for the Gauteng market and national retailers. Citrus<br />
and table grapes are exported to the European market.<br />
Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is blessed with mineral deposits, such as platinum, of which<br />
the public sector makes the largest contributions to the local economy. It is situated in the<br />
fertile soil alongside the rivers of Lepellane, offering great agricultural potential which is<br />
currently underutilized. This municipality is surrounded by beautiful mountains and has rich<br />
cultural history with potential to become tourist attractions.<br />
Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Groblersdal is the centre of a progressive farming community because of the town’s<br />
fortunate location in the Olifants River irrigation area below Loskop Dam. Intensive<br />
agricultural activities (under 5 irrigation scheme) cover a total surface area of 28 000 ha. The<br />
gross agricultural production of the district is estimated at R250 million per annum. The<br />
agricultural produce includes grapes, wheat, tobacco, maize, soya beans, citrus fruits, cotton<br />
and vegetables.<br />
Table 85: Priority sectors of local municipality<br />
Local<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Agriculture and<br />
agroprocessing<br />
Mining Constructio<br />
n<br />
Touris<br />
m<br />
Other<br />
sector<br />
Public<br />
sector<br />
s<br />
Elias Motsoaledi X X X X<br />
Fetakgomo X X<br />
X X X<br />
(Platinum)<br />
Makhuduthamaga X X<br />
X X X<br />
(concrete)<br />
(retail)<br />
Ephraim Mogale X X X X
212<br />
Tubatse X X<br />
(various)<br />
Source: SDM (2006b) – Results of LED rapid appraisal<br />
X<br />
X<br />
Competitive and Comparative advantages<br />
For the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy to grow sustainably, revenue and investment flows must<br />
increase, preferably from external markets. It is therefore necessary to determine which<br />
external markets <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>-based enterprises can complete in profitably and sustainably.<br />
It is also important to understand the nature of competitive advantages and disadvantages in<br />
these markets, and to recognize which factors are critical to success and which factors still<br />
constrain the relevant sector’s performance.<br />
The <strong>District</strong> is currently exploring 5 key markets that offer viable potential to drive future<br />
economic growth in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. These are described briefly below, and their competitive<br />
advantages and disadvantages are highlighted.<br />
Platinum and Chrome Ore Mining<br />
Prospects for the sustained growth and competiveness of platinum and chrome ore are<br />
extremely healthy, as previous sections in this chapter have attested. The potential for propoor<br />
growth is also solid, mainly in enterprises supplying goods and services to the mines.<br />
Main market: Gauteng and international mining houses<br />
Supplies and outsourced services to local mines<br />
Currently, prospects for sustained growth and competitiveness are healthy for the next 20<br />
Years¹. The potential for pro-poor growth is reasonable, and mainly in enterprises supplying<br />
goods and services to the mines. Employment in these services and production are labour<br />
intensive. The growth in these sectors will also contribute to grow in other sector, such as<br />
retail, property and transport.<br />
Main market: Platinum and Chrome mining cluster on the Dilokong Corridor.<br />
Table 86: Main sectors: Services, Transport & Logistics, Construction, Manufacturing, property<br />
Market Agriculture, Agro-processing and Tourism<br />
Competitive advantage<br />
Competitive disadvantages<br />
Demand conditions:<br />
- There are more than forty types of<br />
services that the mine could source<br />
providers can be established or<br />
attracted to operate from Fetakgomo.<br />
- The opportunities include transport of<br />
material in the mine, out to the<br />
- Few local support industries<br />
- Shortages of skills<br />
- Low levels of education
213<br />
smelter, cleaning services, labour<br />
broker, maintenance of plant and<br />
machinery, garden services including<br />
the supply of meat and vegetables.<br />
- The mines are willing to source<br />
locally provided competitive suppliers<br />
that can be developed.<br />
- Risk should be managed – mine<br />
operations must not be disrupted by<br />
supplier/ service provider<br />
- Most procurement takes place from<br />
head office outside SDM.<br />
- Uncertainty about land availability for<br />
expansion: surface mining rights<br />
housing<br />
- Ability to anticipate and manage<br />
community expectations related to<br />
development<br />
- Relationship challenges with<br />
neighboring communities<br />
Supporting Industries<br />
- LIBSA<br />
- LIMDEV<br />
- Supportive Local Government<br />
Locational factors<br />
- Close proximity to the large scale<br />
mining activities – mine as a market<br />
- Access to basic services in growth<br />
points<br />
- Some existing services providers<br />
- Some existing facilities and<br />
infrastructure<br />
Source: SDM (2007b). Local Economic Development (LED) strategy<br />
Fruit, Vegetables, Cotton, Meat and Beneficiation<br />
Agriculture is labour intensive and creates employment. Prospects for sustained growth and<br />
competitiveness are good if existing constraints can be dealt with effectively. The potential<br />
for pro-poor growth is high, especially if markets can be made more easily accessible for<br />
example, establishment of a local agro-processing plant that sources from emerging<br />
farmers. Agriculture only makes a marginal contribution to growth in other sectors.<br />
Despite the water constraint in many areas, other production areas with irrigation are under<br />
utilized for various reasons. The sector does not have expertise, experience and market<br />
linkages to grow and create many jobs. The climate and location offers competitive<br />
advantage i.e. speed to market and the long duration of the warm season.<br />
Table 87: Main markets: National Retailers, EU Agents & Chain stores, Gauteng<br />
Fresh Produce Markets - Sector: Agriculture, Agro-processing
2<strong>14</strong><br />
Competitive Advantages<br />
Competitive Disadvantages<br />
Establishment commercial farming sector - Subsistence level farming persist<br />
Advanced citrus sector serving international<br />
markets<br />
- Oversupply in commodity markets<br />
pushes price down, affording low<br />
margins<br />
Markets for livestock: Mines, Gauteng<br />
Established links to the Gauteng, National<br />
- Farmers have little to no bargaining<br />
power.<br />
Retailers and EU markets<br />
- Access to markets limited<br />
- Emerging farmers especially in<br />
Demand Conditions:<br />
remote areas<br />
Rand has weekend recently, contributing to<br />
price competitiveness in export market<br />
- Limited access to suppliers in remote<br />
areas<br />
Supporting Industries<br />
- Limited emerging/establishment<br />
partnerships<br />
Availability of technical skills<br />
- Ineffective technical support to<br />
emerging farmers<br />
Locational Factors:<br />
- Mistrust by business of government<br />
- Land ownership: current regulations<br />
- Proximity to Gauteng Market<br />
discourages investment<br />
- Close to the mine as a market - Labour regulations discourage<br />
- Vast expanses of unutilized land with fulltime<br />
agriculture potential<br />
employment to the detriment of both<br />
- Availability of water (near rivers and<br />
the farmer and the farm worker<br />
irrigation schemes)<br />
- 75% of the arable land in SDM is<br />
- Water supply to improve, increased<br />
capacity of Flag Boshielo and the<br />
under<br />
unsettled claim (850 claims)<br />
new<br />
De Hoop dams<br />
- Agricultural expansion is water<br />
constrained in many places<br />
- Underutilized existing irrigation - Shortage of certain skills<br />
schemes<br />
- Low levels of education<br />
- Fertile soil<br />
- Limited electricity supply to remote<br />
- Favourable climate conditions<br />
areas<br />
- Long seasons for production<br />
- Limited access to telecommunications<br />
- Existing skills<br />
infrastructure<br />
- Potential for larger scale<br />
- Risk associated with periods of<br />
commercialization – variety of drought<br />
products<br />
- Limited supply of veterinary services<br />
- Entrepreneurs with ideas and capital in<br />
outlying areas<br />
- Some areas suffer from erosion and<br />
overgrazing<br />
Source: SDM (2007b). Local Economic Development (LED) Strategy<br />
Business and Leisure Tourism
215<br />
In lieu of the high dependency of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy on the public and mining<br />
sectors, other sectors need to be developed in the longer term to diversify the economy. This<br />
will render it less vulnerable when the mining boom subsides. Tourism is one sector where<br />
competitive advantage can be developed and maintained over time.<br />
The short term demand especially, whilst the mining expansion takes place, presents an<br />
opportunity to create appropriate facilities that meet the market demand and will be<br />
sustainable. The current tourism sector is not yet competitive due to infrastructure<br />
development of new access roads and key tourism attractions. The potential for pr-poor<br />
growth is limited in the short term but will increase with time. Tourism is typically labour<br />
intensive and will have positive spin-offs for other sectors such as housing, retail and golf<br />
course development following tourism investment.<br />
Main markets: Local and Foreign Tourism travelling mainly from Gauteng<br />
Table 88: Tourism Sector: Accommodation and other tourism service providers<br />
Competitive Advantages<br />
Competitive Disadvantages<br />
Consist mainly of number of small lodges,<br />
guesthouses, game farms, backpacker<br />
establishments. Dedicated restaurants<br />
consist mainly of fast food franchise outlets.<br />
Demand conditions:<br />
- Largest demand for ‘business tourism<br />
- visitors to the public, mining and<br />
agriculture sectors<br />
- Unmet need for accommodation from<br />
mine and municipal visitors to areas<br />
other than Marble Hall, Groblersdal<br />
and Burgersfort<br />
Supporting Industries:<br />
- Proactive Government Support for<br />
Tourism in the form of:<br />
- R60 million from province, National<br />
Dept. Environmental Affairs and<br />
Tourism and National Dept. of Water<br />
Affairs<br />
- Political Support<br />
- Support from the Magoshi<br />
- Key tourist attractions / heritage sites<br />
still not developed to competitive<br />
standard<br />
- Poor quality of service and skills,<br />
especially in the hospitality sector<br />
- Limited understanding of target<br />
markets<br />
- Fragmentation and poor cooperation<br />
in the tourism sector<br />
- Poorly maintained roads and<br />
underdeveloped road infrastructure<br />
- Shortage of skills in the broad tourism<br />
sector<br />
- Landownership constraint in tribal<br />
areas<br />
- Development land/site availability /<br />
ownership = investment risk<br />
- Backlog in basic infrastructure<br />
(including electricity) in rural and<br />
remote areas<br />
- Limited access to telecommunication<br />
infrastructure<br />
Locational factors:<br />
- Flag Boshielo Dam/Schuinsdraal<br />
Game Reserve initiative – Planned<br />
Big 5 reserve, malaria free, only
216<br />
2hours from Gauteng, housing & golf<br />
estates<br />
- Variety of agricultural education<br />
attractions<br />
- Picturesque area with potential for<br />
many activities related to the<br />
landscape<br />
- Rich cultural historical area with<br />
many heritage sites<br />
Source: SDM (2007b). Local Economic Development (LED) Strategy<br />
Public Sector Infrastructure Spending<br />
The Public Sector investment and service provision in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> will continue to grow as<br />
long as the <strong>District</strong> remains a Presidential priority node. Two district potentials arise that LED<br />
can tap into:<br />
- Directing, shifting such investment to support the LED strategic priorities to unlock<br />
economic potential more effectively<br />
- Increasing the local private and emerging sector capacity to deliver such services, to<br />
win a larger share of these local contracts<br />
- The public sector market includes work contracted by: Department of Water Affairs<br />
and Forestry, Department of Public Works, Road Agency Limpopo, Department of<br />
Housing and Department of Provincial and Local Government (MIG)<br />
expenditure.<br />
Table 89: Local Suppliers, Construction, transport & logistics, Services, Manufacturing,<br />
property market, Tourism<br />
Competitive advantages<br />
Competitive Disadvantages<br />
Public sector services providers<br />
Demand conditions<br />
- SDM is a presidential development<br />
node and qualifies proportionately for<br />
more state development funding<br />
- Massive investment in upgrading the<br />
SDM infrastructure is planned – this<br />
includes building of dams, reticulating<br />
water and waste, roads, housing<br />
development, electricity and<br />
telecommunication<br />
- Quality of infrastructure not to be<br />
comprised by awarding contracts to<br />
underperformers<br />
Supporting Industries<br />
- Municipal planners, Engineers,<br />
Building inspectors<br />
- Supportive Local Government<br />
Mostly external SDM<br />
- Quality of work<br />
- Poor quality control<br />
- Poor cooperation between<br />
established<br />
and emerging contractors<br />
- Limited experience and credibility of<br />
local construction enterprises<br />
- Limited tendering skills<br />
- Limited expertise to manage big<br />
contracts<br />
- Municipalities are not accessing<br />
maximum of infrastructure grants<br />
- Local development priorities are not<br />
linked effectively to <strong>District</strong> and<br />
provincial priorities<br />
- Local development priorities not
217<br />
- Qualify for MIG, EPWP, … grant<br />
funding<br />
- LIBSA provides training support<br />
Locational factors<br />
- Cost advantage of local proximity<br />
- Local know how<br />
- Diversity of construction skills<br />
- Contractors willing to work together<br />
- Earth moving equipment<br />
- Building materials available<br />
linked effectively to public sector<br />
support agencies<br />
- Locals not aware of all the existing<br />
opportunities / potential projects<br />
- Limited availability of finance for<br />
construction sector<br />
- Shortage of engineers<br />
- Shortage of technical skills<br />
- Low levels of education<br />
Source: SDM (2007b). Local Economic Development (LED) Strategy<br />
Tourism<br />
The table below is the result of a rapid appraisal process conducted in November 2006 as<br />
part of the <strong>District</strong>’s LED Strategy formulation (SDM, 2006b). It sets out the main local<br />
constraints to growth that municipal practitioners themselves identified.<br />
Table 90: Constraints to economic growth in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Land Roads Skills Other<br />
Elias Motsoaledi<br />
Land Ownership<br />
Fetakgomo<br />
Unblock the land<br />
constraints<br />
Makhuduthamaga<br />
Access to land Delay<br />
in proclamation of<br />
Jane Furse as a<br />
township.<br />
Fragmented release<br />
of land which leads<br />
to distorted planning<br />
Groblersdal to<br />
Roosenekal (33700)<br />
Groblersdal to<br />
Bronkhorstspruit<br />
(R25) The road from<br />
Groblersdal via<br />
Roosenekal to the<br />
Mapoch Caves<br />
needs upgrading<br />
Upgrade D4190<br />
Road to Atok Mine.<br />
Build a road from<br />
R37 to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
cultural village<br />
Roads to Manchi<br />
Masemola tourist<br />
site, various access<br />
roads to heritage<br />
sites and to link<br />
municipal sub-growth<br />
points and nodes of<br />
neighbouring<br />
municipalities<br />
Support emerging<br />
farmers to gain<br />
commercial farming<br />
skills<br />
Emerging farmers to<br />
gain commercial<br />
farming skills and lift<br />
them to a<br />
commercial level<br />
Infrastructure<br />
development around<br />
Mapoch cave<br />
Infrastructure e.g.<br />
roads, water and<br />
electricity for mines<br />
Remove blockages<br />
to investment in<br />
housing<br />
Funding for feasibility<br />
studies
218<br />
Ephraim Mogale<br />
Make more land<br />
available (land audit)<br />
Tubatse<br />
No readily available<br />
land for<br />
development.<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> does not<br />
own sufficient land to<br />
stimulate economic<br />
growth in Burgersfort<br />
and Steelpoort. Land<br />
is owned by private<br />
sector and is sold at<br />
a high price.<br />
Upgrade roads<br />
starting with<br />
reconstruction of part<br />
of the N11<br />
Major roads needs to<br />
be upgraded – R37,<br />
R555<br />
Source: SDM (2006b) – Results of LED rapid appraisal<br />
Supporting emerging<br />
farmers to gain<br />
commercial farming<br />
skills strengthening<br />
of Tompi Seleka<br />
Agricultural College<br />
Capacity Building for<br />
Small Contractors<br />
Facilitate Access to<br />
Technical Skills and<br />
accreditation<br />
Determine the key<br />
factors that<br />
discourage<br />
employment of<br />
permanent farm<br />
workers Remove<br />
municipal capacity<br />
bottlenecks to<br />
infrastructure<br />
development. Flag<br />
Boshielo concession<br />
and property<br />
Development<br />
Mining supply park<br />
De Hoop Dam<br />
(water)<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> seems poised to experience a major boom in platinum mining in the near future<br />
– a move that will grow its economy substantially if the <strong>District</strong> exploits these opportunities<br />
effectively. Agriculture and tourism also offer potential dividends. However, the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
economy currently has a number of unhealthy features which could undermine economic<br />
development efforts in the future.<br />
Table 91: Employment levels<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> Employed Unemployed Unemployment<br />
rate<br />
1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />
Ephraim Mogale 11207 15632 18350 10005 12721 12944 47,2 44,9 41,4<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 19696 20155 32203 <strong>23</strong>862 24027 24175 54,8 54,4 42,9<br />
Makhuduthamaga 12409 10686 19534 29370 32174 32780 70,3 75,1 62,7<br />
Fetakgomo 3611 4861 9184 9921 10449 13154 73,3 68,3 58,9<br />
Greater Tubatse 13938 19<strong>14</strong>7 49522 24464 30654 50221 63,7 61,6 50,4<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 60860 70481 128794 97622 110026 133274 61,6 61,0 50,9<br />
Source: Census (2011)
219<br />
In 2011, 49% of the persons who are of working age are employed compared to 51% that is<br />
unemployed. The total unemployment rate within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is 50,9%.<br />
The average in Limpopo Province for unemployment rate is 38,9%. This clearly implies that<br />
unemployment is still quite high in the district. Waterberg <strong>District</strong> has lowest unemployment<br />
in Limpopo Province standing at 28.1%. Musina Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the lowest<br />
unemployment across at 18.7%.<br />
Figure 37: Employment levels 2011<br />
Source Census (2011)<br />
Comparatively, the situation has improved from 1996 where unemployment was standing at<br />
61.6% and recorded at 50.9 in 2011 although still very high. When comparing local<br />
municipalities in the district, Makhuduthamaga seem to be the hardest hit standing at 62.7%<br />
followed by Fetakgomo at 58.9% and Greater Tubatse at 50,4%.<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has an important role to play with regard to promoting job<br />
opportunities. Although it is the responsibility of government to create jobs, there is a need<br />
for the district to work collaboratively with other role players in the province and nationally to<br />
create conducive environment for business to invest in the district.
220<br />
There are three future job drivers that are likely to transform the unemployment rate in the<br />
district:<br />
· The Presidency has in terms of 17 Strategic Integrated Projects (SIP) identified SIP 1<br />
which will “unlock the northern mineral belt with Waterberg as the catalyst”<br />
· The second mineral wave which will see expansions in existing mining operations in<br />
the district as well as new projects<br />
· National Department of Trade and Industry is working on a special economic zone<br />
model that will see beneficiation of mining products in the district<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should therefore work very closely with the relevant<br />
stakeholders to ensure that these programmes are realised.<br />
Average Household Income<br />
Average household incomes from 2001-2011 have more than doubled across the district. In<br />
the district municipality, household income has shifted from R15 520 to R45 546 in 2011.<br />
The provincial average in R56 841 and therefore the district average household income is<br />
slightly below the provincial average. Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest<br />
average household income in the district, followed by Fetakgomo local municipality.<br />
Although unemployment in Fetakgomo is quite high, those who are working seem to be<br />
deriving high incomes.<br />
Table 92: Average household income<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> 2001 2011<br />
Ephraim Mogale 16 671 41 398<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 17 802 41 398<br />
Makhuduthamaga 12 768 38 109<br />
Fetakgomo <strong>14</strong> 850 47 755<br />
Greater Tubatse 16 166 54 546<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 15 520 45 977<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
Female Headed Households<br />
In the year 2011, 139 93 households in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> are headed by<br />
females. This represents 52,9% of the total households in the district. The provincial average<br />
in 50.4% and therefore the district one is slightly higher. Targeted social programmes that<br />
benefit women in particular are required to alleviate challenges in these households. The
221<br />
highest number of these households is found in Makhuduthamaga, Elias Motsoaledi and<br />
Fetakgomo municipalities.<br />
Table 93: Female Headed Households<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> Female Headed<br />
Households<br />
Number of<br />
households<br />
% of female headed<br />
households<br />
1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />
Ephraim Mogale 10 020 13 254 16 550 19 664 24 189 32 284 51,0 54,8 51,3<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 24 048 26 794 32 061 42 605 45 478 60 251 56,4 58,9 53,2<br />
Makhuduthamaga 30 932 34 334 39 217 49 782 52 978 65 217 62,1 64,8 60,1<br />
Fetakgomo 10 817 11 565 12 769 17 372 18 883 22 851 62,3 61,2 55,9<br />
Greater Tubatse <strong>23</strong> 824 30 446 38 996 42 403 53 756 83 199 56,2 56,6 46,9<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 99 641 116<br />
393<br />
139<br />
593<br />
171<br />
827<br />
195<br />
285<br />
263<br />
802<br />
58,0 59,6 52,9<br />
Source Census (2011)<br />
Child Headed Households<br />
In 2011, 2 949 child headed households were recorded in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
This represents 1,1% of the households in the entire district. Ephraim Mogale and Elias<br />
Motsoaledi have recorded highest numbers of child headed households in the district.<br />
Makhuduthamaga also scored 1,1% of the households headed by children. Programmes to<br />
deal with this issue need to focus on the municipalities with the highest need.<br />
Table 94: Child Headed Households<br />
1996 2001 2011<br />
Househol<br />
ds<br />
headed<br />
by<br />
children<br />
Total<br />
househol<br />
ds<br />
% of<br />
child<br />
headed<br />
househol<br />
ds<br />
Househol<br />
ds<br />
headed<br />
by<br />
children<br />
Total<br />
househol<br />
ds<br />
% of<br />
child<br />
headed<br />
househol<br />
ds<br />
Househol<br />
ds<br />
headed<br />
by<br />
children<br />
Total<br />
househol<br />
ds<br />
% of<br />
child<br />
headed<br />
househol<br />
ds<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Makhudutham<br />
aga<br />
761 19 664 3,9 5<strong>14</strong> 42 701 1,2 464 32 284 1,4<br />
1 872 42 605 4,4 1 007 80 719 1,2 800 60 251 1,3<br />
1 794 49 782 3,6 917 95 710 1,0 737 65 217 1,1<br />
Fetakgomo 721 17 372 4,2 318 34 097 0,9 191 22 851 0,8
222<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
1 971 42 403 4,6 1 058 96 936 1,1 758 83 199 0,9<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 7 119 171 908 4,1 3 8<strong>14</strong> 195 285 2,0 2 949 263 802 1,1<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
Dependency Ratio 1<br />
Table 95: Dependency Ratio<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> 1996 2001 2011<br />
Ephraim Mogale 91,7 82,8 73,7<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 92,5 86,5 76,0<br />
Makhuduthamaga 105,9 94,8 85,4<br />
Fetakgomo 101,0 91,0 77,1<br />
Greater Tubatse 102,6 88,6 65,6<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 99,6 89,2 74,7<br />
Source: Census (2011)<br />
In 2011, the dependency ratio in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> stands at 74.7%. It is<br />
relatively higher compared to the provincial dependency ratio of 67.3. Waterberg has a<br />
dependency ratio of 55.5% and Thabazimbi has the lowest at 30.8%. It will be important to<br />
check the underlying factors that make Thabazimbi achieve such a low dependency ratio in<br />
Limpopo Province.<br />
Within the district however, Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest<br />
dependency ratio at 85.4 way above the district and provincial ratio. This is followed by<br />
Fetakgomo at 77.1 and Elias Motsoaledi at 76.0. There is marked improvement in Greater<br />
Tubatse’s dependency ratio from 102.6 in 1996 to 65.6 in 2011.<br />
It is very indispensable that the municipalities with higher dependency ratio receive much<br />
attention with regard to poverty alleviation programmes and also programmes that will lead<br />
to income generation. Makhuduthamaga, Elias Motsoaledi and Fetakgomo should therefore<br />
be prioritised for poverty alleviation programmes.<br />
Figure 38: Local Economic Development Projects<br />
1 Dependency ratio tells us how many young people under the age of 16 and older people over 64 years who<br />
are not working that have to depend on those who are working age and paying taxes. The higher the<br />
dependency ratio, the more people that need looking after
2<strong>23</strong><br />
Source: SDM Ward committees 2011<br />
Across all the villages in the district, it has been established that there were 379 project<br />
initiatives that were in the form of economic activities. 70% (264) of these initiatives were in<br />
the Agricultural sector compared to 24% (93) in Trade; 4% (<strong>14</strong>) were in Tourism and 2% (8)<br />
were in mining. The picture indicates that most villages are engaged in Agriculture activities<br />
as source of economic opportunity. These initiatives are mainly subsistence in nature and<br />
involve groups of people in the form of cooperatives or just groups working together.<br />
A high number of Local Economic Development initiatives were found in Elias Motsoaledi<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (87 initiatives) followed by Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (84<br />
initiatives); Greater Tubatse (83); Fetakgomo (74) and Ephraim Mogale (51 initiatives).<br />
In general, Agriculture seems to be the sector that received the most attention where 264<br />
initiatives were recorded across the district followed by Trade (93); Tourism (<strong>14</strong>) and finally<br />
mining (8).<br />
It is important to point out that the district municipality and its locals must develop strategies<br />
that will address the development of key sectors in the district namely mining, agriculture<br />
and tourism. Tourism and mining seem to be receiving little attention from community<br />
initiatives and therefore the district and its locals need to zoom into these two areas to<br />
establish reasons. Agriculture, although receiving much attention, tends to focus on small<br />
holder gardens without a clear focus on growth.<br />
3.5.3. Challenges<br />
· The economic potential of the <strong>District</strong> may be undermined by demographic,<br />
infrastructural and spatial challenges alluded to elsewhere in this chapter.<br />
· The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy is excessively reliant on public sector funding with<br />
community services being a major contributor to GGP in the area.
224<br />
· Most revenue flows out of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy as residents and businesses<br />
source and sell their goods and services outside the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
· Decline in global demands for the minerals produced in the area, continued water<br />
scarcity and the increasing mechanization of platinum mining could affect<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s mining industry negatively in the future<br />
· Insufficient beneficiation and value-adding activities occur within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
economy at present.<br />
· Commercial agriculture is coming under increasing pressure as rising input costs; a<br />
stronger local currency, lower commodity prices and external competition take their<br />
toll.<br />
· Subsistence farming continues to dominate the agricultural sector in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />
· The <strong>District</strong>’s tourism potential is not being fully exploited as yet because of a lack of<br />
tourism infrastructure and poor related services.<br />
· The skills profile in the district is low, due to low level of education. This will result in<br />
the economy failing to manage any developmental intervention that the district<br />
may come up with.<br />
· Insufficient funding to implement programmes and projects identified in the LED<br />
strategy.<br />
3.5.4. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Development Agency (SDA)<br />
3.5.4.1. Introduction to SDA<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Development Agency (SDA) is wholly owned by the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> and has been in existence since 2005, operationalized in 2006 through<br />
appointment of the first Board of Directors. It is befitting to define it as being at an early<br />
development stage, particularly given the progress it has made thus far. Like any<br />
organization at that stage, it constantly strives to strike a balance between setting and<br />
pursuing its development path whilst simultaneously addressing operational limitations. Such<br />
a scenario often results in multiple and competing priorities, with limited resources to ensure<br />
their attainment, that blur progression towards attaining the desired outcomes.<br />
The function and activities of SDA is informed by the following statutory and legal framework:<br />
· Company’s Act<br />
· Municipal Systems Act, 2000<br />
· Municipal Systems Amendment Act, 2011<br />
3.5.4.2. Status Quo on SDA<br />
SDA is still at an establishment stage of organisational development – it does not have a<br />
sizeable organisational muscle to carry out ambitious programmes that may be beyond its<br />
capabilities. This does not preclude it from attempting such programmes in partnership with<br />
current or new development partners
225<br />
A new board has just been unveiled and its mandate is also clearly articulated - the board<br />
sought to set a strategic path, canvass support for it and guide management in driving the<br />
implementation.<br />
PROJECT STUDIES UNDERTAKEN<br />
Project Description & Status Quo<br />
· Tjate Heritage Site Feasibility study<br />
This project entails studying the possibility of establishing a tourist facility at the Tjate<br />
Heritage Site for tourism attraction. Tjate Heritage Site forms the core of the special interest<br />
cluster within the Tourism Strategy and is one of the flagship projects. Tjate was the royal<br />
seat of the ancient <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Empire. It could become the primary core of all tourism<br />
attractions in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />
The study is completed, however ruled out the idea of constructing a facility and encouraged<br />
that thorough marketing and events be made to promote the site since it is not known to<br />
many tourists due to its location<br />
· Potlake Game Reserve<br />
The project involved development of chalets, camping site, picnic site and conference<br />
facilities at the reserve. The study proved feasible. Currently all stakeholders are still<br />
negotiating on a suitable model. The development of the nature reserve is aligned to the<br />
Limpopo Provincial Growth and Development Strategy’s objective to achieve a growing<br />
economy with sustainable jobs, innovation and competitiveness.<br />
· Schuinsdraai/Flag Boshielo Tourism Development<br />
The project entails development of an integrated tourism facility within the Flag Boshielo<br />
precinct.<br />
· Rubber Tyre Recycling Plant<br />
The project entails establishment of a tyre and rubber recycling center and processing plant<br />
of the waste tyre. This is a green environment project and its main aim is the promotion of<br />
the optimal utilisation of available landfill site space by formulating more environmentally and<br />
economically sustainable ways in which waste tyres can be recycled or discarded, while at<br />
the same time promoting the generation of an income for tyre collectors and recyclers.<br />
· Small Scale Mining Feasibility<br />
NON STUDIED PROJECTS
226<br />
· Mining Preferential Procurement Incubation Project<br />
The project seeks to contribute towards mine community development utilizing Preferential<br />
Procurement and Enterprise Development as part of the Government strategy to broaden<br />
the national economic participation and achievement of social stability. The project will build<br />
capacity within our SMME’s through an incubation process which will enable them to supply<br />
the mines in the district.<br />
· Emerging Farmer Identification and Support Project<br />
The agency pursued the project with an intention to address the agricultural challenges that<br />
the district is facing. The project involves identification of all potential pockets of lands for<br />
agricultural purposes and communities and farmers who are prepared to produce. The<br />
Agency partnered with Crebus and Land Bank to assist farmers in the district. Many farmers<br />
applied for financial and technical assistance from Land bank and Crebus. During the end of<br />
the financial year in question 103 farmers had submitted for financial assistance from Land<br />
bank.<br />
The other areas that the agency was looking at was revival of all the collapsed LDA funded<br />
irrigation schemes in the district and as well by the end of this financial year the agency was<br />
in deep consultations with relevant stakeholders. The Agency is working hard to unlock all<br />
the schemes to be fully productive by end of next financial year.<br />
3.5.4.3. Challenges facing SDA<br />
The mining sector has remained very difficult to work with. The study conducted proved to<br />
be difficult to access information both from the mining companies and the DMR itself.<br />
However the sector needs more attention since is the strongest sector in the district.<br />
The manufacturing sector also received attention towards the end of the season especially<br />
when looking at agro-processing in the district. The feasibility study on rubber tyre recycling<br />
plant proved to be unsustainable leaving less space for the agency to pursue the project.<br />
The facilitation and securing of direct investments to the projects which proved feasible<br />
remains a challenge. Our communities still have their own internal differences which also<br />
impact on development.<br />
The following are some of the organizational challenges the Agency is facing:<br />
- Shortage of permanent personnel and insufficient skill base<br />
- Vision not yet shared by relevant stakeholders and shareholder<br />
- Lack of coordination on facilitation of economic projects<br />
- Shared supply chain management<br />
- Fragmented financial management arrangements<br />
- Insufficient internal controls – staffing inadequacies<br />
- Adverse audit report – disclaimer
227<br />
- Competition with LED units over projects to be implemented<br />
3.6. FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
3.6.1. Introduction<br />
The financial objective of the SDM is to secure sound and sustainable management of the<br />
financial affairs of the <strong>District</strong> and to assist the five local municipalities within the SDM to be<br />
financially viable. The Audit reports as issued by the Auditor General for the past five years<br />
have indicated a lot of financial challenges ranging from disclaimer audit reports, low<br />
revenue collection, inadequate asset management and internal controls.<br />
3.6.2. Compliance with Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA)<br />
‣ Section 63 – Assets and Liability Management<br />
The municipality has a GRAP compliant asset register which is updated on a<br />
quarterly basis.<br />
‣ Section 64 – Revenue Management<br />
The municipality has credit control and debt management policy and the tariff policy<br />
which are reviewed annually. The municipality derives its revenue from government<br />
grants and billing of water consumption. Billing is done on the 25 th of every month<br />
through the MunSoft system, which is planned to be faced out and will be replaces by<br />
E-Venus. Draft revenue enhancement strategy is being developed awaiting council<br />
approval.<br />
‣ Section 82 – Delegations<br />
Compiles reviews and approved a Register of Delegated Powers and Functions<br />
annually.<br />
‣ Section 83 – Competency Levels of professional Financial Officials<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> Provides assistance to personnel to improve competency levels<br />
‣ Section 111 – Supply Chain Management<br />
Supply Chain Management Policy was adopted by Council in 2005 and is reviewed<br />
annually with the adoption of the budget. The municipality has established a threepart<br />
bid committee system.<br />
‣ Section 165 – Internal Audit Unit<br />
An internal audit unit has been established and functional with appointment of three<br />
officials. The unit has an audit charter which was approved and adopted by council in<br />
2008 and is reviewed annually.<br />
‣ Section 166 – Audit Committee
228<br />
Audit committee has been established and effective. It is scheduled to meet at least<br />
four times in a year. The audit committee has an audit committee charter which<br />
was approved and adopted by committee and noted by council in 2008 and reviewed<br />
annually.<br />
Conformity exists within the following stipulations on report and reportable<br />
matters:<br />
- Section 71 – Monthly budget statement to Provincial and National treasury (xx<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> to sign off monthly reports to PT & NT for full compliance.<br />
- Section 72 – Midyear budget and performance assessment by accounting Officer.<br />
- Section 75 – Prescribed information placed on official website.<br />
- Section 121 and 127 – Annual Report that includes:<br />
• The annual financial statements<br />
• The annual report<br />
Table 96: The AFS has been compiled in terms of GAMAP/GRAP<br />
Financial Year<br />
Audit Report<br />
2006/07 Disclaimer<br />
2007/08 Disclaimer<br />
2008/09 Disclaimer<br />
2009/10 Disclaimer<br />
2010/11 Disclaimer<br />
2011/12 Outstanding<br />
‣ Section 129 – Oversight reports on Annual Reports<br />
The <strong>Municipality</strong> has established an oversight Committee which considers the<br />
adoption of the annual report.<br />
‣ Section 131 – Issue raised by the Auditor-General in Audit report<br />
The municipality developed an action plan to deal with issues by Auditor-General,<br />
which is monitored on a monthly basis management to track progress.<br />
3.6.3. Overall Challenges<br />
1. Lack of capacity – training<br />
2. Lack of asset management<br />
3. Insufficient Office space<br />
4. Lack of internal control – safe guarding of assets<br />
5. Non-compliance related to bid box<br />
6. Lack of BEE scorecard model<br />
7. Inadequate SMME development
229<br />
8. Lack of communication channels with external stakeholders<br />
9. Inadequate information security<br />
10. Non adherence to timelines<br />
11. Interference on Supply Chain Management and Payments processes<br />
12. Promulgation of by-laws<br />
13. Cash Management Security<br />
<strong>14</strong>. Low collection rate/<br />
15. Insufficient credit control measures<br />
16. Indigent register updating<br />
17. Non adherence to cash flow management<br />
18. Over commitment of budget<br />
The installation of a comprehensive financial system is 75% complete. The system will<br />
ensure:<br />
· Improved control and management of Supply Chain Management processes<br />
· Accurate expenditure reporting<br />
· Accurate and up to date cash flow monitoring<br />
· More stringent financial controls<br />
· A reliable picture of the state of the district municipality’s finances<br />
Key high level delivery<br />
areas<br />
Management of revenue and<br />
expenditure<br />
Detailed activities Status quo 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />
Management of creditors and<br />
accounts<br />
Management of payroll<br />
In 2011/<strong>2013</strong> financial year a<br />
Disclaimer audit opinion was<br />
obtained<br />
50% compliance with fixed<br />
asset register<br />
40% updated inventory<br />
register<br />
60% compliance with<br />
disposal processes of asset<br />
management policy<br />
80% of creditors paid within<br />
30 days of invoice date<br />
Scanning of documents from<br />
hard to electronic versions<br />
not implemented<br />
Expenditure reconciliation<br />
being undertaken annually<br />
58% collection rate attained
<strong>23</strong>0<br />
50% of service level<br />
agreements available and<br />
updated on the contract<br />
register<br />
3.6.4. Asset Management<br />
Introduction<br />
The role of Asset Management is critical to any business environment whether private or<br />
public sector. In the past municipalities used a cash-based system to account for assets,<br />
whilst the trend has been to move to an accrual system. With the cash-based system, assets<br />
were written off at year end and no costs were attached to subsequent period in which<br />
assets would be used. With the accrual system, assets are incorporated into the books of<br />
accounts and systematically written off over their anticipated lives.<br />
This necessitates that record of asset costs are kept and key asset management functions<br />
required are:<br />
‣ Recognition of all existing assets<br />
‣ Safeguarding assets<br />
‣ Maintaining assets<br />
‣ Establishing accounting and information systems that account for the assets of the<br />
municipality<br />
‣ Valuation principles in accordance with GRAP<br />
‣ Establishing and maintaining systems of internal controls over assets<br />
‣ Establishing and maintaining GRAP compliant asset register<br />
‣ Clarifying responsibilities and accountabilities for the asset management process<br />
Effective asset management functions are guided by following statutory and legal<br />
framework:<br />
‣ Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996<br />
‣ Public Finance management Act, of 1999<br />
‣ National Treasury Asset management framework<br />
‣ Municipal Finance management Act, of 2003<br />
‣ Local Government Financial Best Practice Manual<br />
‣ Disaster Management Act, of 2002<br />
‣ National Water Act, of 1998<br />
‣ Water Service Act, of 1997<br />
‣ Municipal System Act, of 2000<br />
‣ Municipal Structures Act, of 1998
<strong>23</strong>1<br />
STATUS QUO<br />
MOVEABLE ASSETS<br />
Moveable assets are all bar coded and linked to responsible custodians in all departments<br />
Verification is been conducted quarterly, new acquired assets are bar coded upon receipt,<br />
condition of assets is recorded during verification, monthly reconciliation and calculation s<br />
of depreciation have started. Most of our assets allocated to depots are too old and require<br />
an effective strategy to replace them. An auction for obsolete, damaged and redundant<br />
assets was conducted-during 2012/13 and it was a success<br />
IMMOVABLES ASSETS<br />
Completed immovable assets were unbundled and Auditor General disclaimed the<br />
municipality on the unbundled Fixed Asset Register due to lack of supporting documents to<br />
support the unbundled assets.<br />
We are in progress of gathering relevant information to unbundle all outstanding and new<br />
projects developed (WIP & completed) .as part of our three year plan. The primary objective<br />
of our three year plan is mainly to unbundle and review all projects including assessment of<br />
their condition for impairments purposes.<br />
In continuation of our three year plan, during <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> an asset maintenance plan will be<br />
developed to will be developed to ensure that projects attain anticipated lives. Impairment<br />
tests will be conducted quarterly to cross check effectiveness of the asset maintenance plan<br />
and adjustments be done were necessary.<br />
STORES MANAGEMENT<br />
The inventory system is not functional during this 2012/13 financial year. Stores records are<br />
kept manually, showing opening balance of 2012/13<br />
Stores management procedures manual have been reviewed and service standards have<br />
been developed to ensure efficient and effective running of stores.<br />
CHALLENGES<br />
‣ Skills shortage<br />
‣ Stores items procured directly from departmental votes<br />
‣ Inventory register is maintained manually attributed to direct purchases<br />
‣ Decentralised stores management<br />
‣ Unavailability of projects information (data)<br />
3.6.5. Budget and Reporting
<strong>23</strong>2<br />
Introduction<br />
The role of Budget unit is to compile; coordinate and monitor budget of the<br />
municipality. This is an on-going process where it requires great skills and extensive<br />
attention to details.<br />
The main aim of this Unit is:-<br />
· To ensure accurate reporting for improvement in decision making.<br />
· Preparation of the municipal budget and monitoring of the budget.<br />
· To effectively manage funds and keep municipal debts at minimal level.<br />
· To ensure accuracy and consistency in our municipal budget.<br />
Table 97: Challenges and backlogs at Budget & Treasury Unit<br />
Key<br />
Priority Status Quo Challenges<br />
performance<br />
Area<br />
Financial<br />
Management<br />
To ensure sufficient<br />
reserve funds to<br />
address asset<br />
renewal by creation<br />
of capital<br />
replacement reserve<br />
fund<br />
Non-existence of capital<br />
replacement reserve funds.<br />
Minimal own funding to address<br />
assets renewals.<br />
Unable to budget for sufficient<br />
capital replacements on<br />
dilapidated infrastructure<br />
assets due to insufficient<br />
budget on own funding<br />
To ensure timely<br />
submission of<br />
Annual Financial<br />
and improved Audit<br />
Opinion<br />
To ensure<br />
preparation and<br />
implementation of<br />
realistic budget for<br />
the municipality<br />
AFS submitted by 30th November<br />
2012<br />
Obtained a disclaimer audit opinion<br />
by Feb <strong>2013</strong><br />
Four budgets made<br />
(Original budget, roll-over budget,<br />
special adjustment budget due to<br />
non-approval of unspent grants<br />
and mid-year adjustment budget.<br />
Monthly reconciliation of<br />
account balances not done on<br />
time. Standards chart of<br />
accounts not properly ring<br />
fenced on to the financial<br />
system.<br />
Inability of municipality to<br />
spend the original budget<br />
accordingly which results in a<br />
number of adjustment budget<br />
passed on the original budget.<br />
3.6.6. Revenue Management<br />
Introduction<br />
Revenue Management is the application of disciplined analytics that predict consumer<br />
behaviour at the local government level and optimize service availability and price to
<strong>23</strong>3<br />
maximize revenue growth. The primary aim of Revenue Management is providing the<br />
mandated services to the right consumers at the right time for the right price. The essence of<br />
this discipline is in understanding consumers’ perception of service value and accurately<br />
aligning service prices, placement and availability with each consumer segment.<br />
The Revenue Management Process entails:<br />
‣ Data Collection<br />
‣ Segmentation<br />
‣ Forecasting<br />
‣ Optimization<br />
‣ Dynamic Re-evaluation<br />
Effective revenue management functions are guided by following statutory and legal<br />
framework:<br />
‣ Division of Revenue Act<br />
‣ Public Finance management Act, of 1999<br />
‣ Municipal Finance management Act, of 2003<br />
‣ Local Government Financial Best Practice Manual<br />
‣ National Water Act, of 1998<br />
‣ Water Service Act, of 1997<br />
‣ Municipal System Act, of 2000<br />
Status Quo<br />
SDM has entered into service level agreements with three of its local municipalities (Elias<br />
Motsoaledi; Ephraim Mogale; Greater Tubatse) for billing and collection. As per the signed<br />
SLA, contracts are due to cease end June <strong>2013</strong>. SDM had a retail contract with LNW which<br />
expired in 2006 for Flag Boshielo East & West. The SLA’s had a provision of 70/30<br />
commission based on billing.<br />
Data Collection<br />
The Revenue Management process begins with data collection. Relevant data are<br />
paramount to a Revenue Management System’s capability to provide accurate, actionable<br />
information. A system must collect and store historical data for inventory, prices, demand,<br />
and other causal factors. Any data that reflects the details of services offered their prices and<br />
consumer payment rate, stored, and analysed.<br />
Billing<br />
Billing process takes the form of the automated billing on eVenus, interest and sundry billing<br />
will be in the form of journals.<br />
Included in the billing process are the following processes:
<strong>23</strong>4<br />
1. refunds, (clearance, deposit)<br />
2. change of ownership,<br />
3. adjustments, (over and under billing)<br />
4. change of service, cancellation of service, (Adjustment of service)<br />
5. handling of queries,<br />
6. processing of service order (meter readings sheets)<br />
Credit Control<br />
The municipality’s collection process follows the under-mentioned steps:<br />
1. Telephone Collection.<br />
2. Written reminder.<br />
3. Final Notice.<br />
4. Communication with Water Service departments for service termination or restriction<br />
5. Legal action/ hand-over to the municipality attorneys or debt collectors.<br />
6. Listing of debtors with Credit Bureau.<br />
7. Recommendation for write off as bad debt.<br />
Receipting<br />
1. Ensuring that the cash receipts process are performed efficiently (using the best<br />
methods to secure cash receipts)<br />
2. Ensuring that cash received is banked and recorded on a timely basis.<br />
3. To ensure that cash from debtors is received and recorded<br />
4. To ensure that receipts are recorded at the correct amount<br />
Challenges<br />
‣ Data Management & cleansing<br />
‣ Meter Reading<br />
‣ Indigent Management<br />
‣ Service Delivery<br />
‣ Implementation of WSA/WSP agreements<br />
3.6.7. Supply Chain Management<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Supply Chain Management Unit is established in order to procure goods and services,<br />
disposes goods no longer needed and select contractors to provide assistance in the<br />
provision of municipal services.<br />
The Supply Chain Management Unit should ensure that bid documentation, evaluation and<br />
adjudication criteria and general conditions of a contract, are in accordance with any<br />
applicable legislation and that any Treasury guidelines on Supply Chain Management are<br />
properly taken into account when procuring goods or services.
<strong>23</strong>5<br />
Legislative Requirement<br />
a) The constitution of the republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996<br />
b) The preferential procurement policy framework Act 5 of 2000<br />
c) The broad based black empowerment Act 53 of 2003<br />
d) Municipal Finance Management Act ,No.56 of 200<br />
STATUS QUO<br />
BID COMMITTEES<br />
All Supply Chain Management Committees that have been established are:<br />
a. Specification Committee<br />
b. Evaluation Committee<br />
c. Adjudication Committee<br />
d. Quotation Committee<br />
All Committees are fully functional<br />
ADVERTISEMENT OF TENDERS<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
Briefings are being conducted before the closing date of tender.<br />
Tenders are advertised in two national newspapers.<br />
Seven days quotations are advertised on the notice board.<br />
Tender documentation are submitted in the tender box, which is opened on the<br />
closing date of the tender.<br />
TENDER DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT<br />
ü<br />
The tender documents are submitted to registry of the evaluation and adjudication<br />
has been conducted.<br />
CHALLENGES<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
ü<br />
Non functionality of the website<br />
Manual rotation of database<br />
Skills shortage<br />
Procurement plan<br />
3.6.8. Contract Management<br />
Introduction
<strong>23</strong>6<br />
v<br />
Contract Management a function of ensuring that contracts are managed and<br />
accounted for in compliance with the MFMA. The unit is required to identify all<br />
contracts and stakeholders, to classify all contracts for management purposes, to<br />
manage all the stages in the contract life cycle, to correctly account for contracts in<br />
financial statements, to ensure that services are delivered within specification and at<br />
agreed costs, and to avoid legal disputes and cost overruns by ensuring that contract<br />
are managed properly. Contract management is therefore essential for good financial<br />
management and contributes to efficient and effective service delivery.<br />
Status Quo<br />
- Despite having only one official in the unit, it is on course to ensure that the following<br />
are in place before the end of the financial year:<br />
· Contract register is fully update;<br />
· All service providers in the <strong>Municipality</strong> have signed contracts;<br />
· Advice is provided to departments as and when required<br />
Contract Management Framework<br />
v<br />
It sets out the requirements for managing and accounting for contracts and<br />
requires organisational wide approach.<br />
Challenges<br />
- Appointment of a contract management officer;<br />
- Ensuring that reports from project managers and other end users are submitted<br />
monthly to monitor performance;<br />
- Ensure that all departments submit contracts to the unit.<br />
3.6.9. Expenditure Management Unit<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The expenditure management is responsible for the management of the expenditure of the<br />
entity, and include taking all reasonable steps to ensure that the entity has and maintains an<br />
effective system of expenditure control including procedures for approval, authorisation,<br />
withdrawal and payment of fund. And that the entity has and maintains a management,<br />
accounting and information system which:<br />
· Recognises expenditure when it is incurred ;<br />
· Accounts for creditors of the entity ;<br />
· Accounts for payments made by the entity<br />
That the entity has and maintains a system of internal control in respect of creditors and<br />
payments, further that all money owed for goods and services is paid within 30days of<br />
receiving the relevant invoices or statement unless prescribed otherwise for certain<br />
categories of expenditure.
<strong>23</strong>7<br />
And that payments by the entity are made directly to the person to whom it is due unless<br />
agreed otherwise only for the reasons as may be prescribed; and either electronically or by<br />
way of non transferable cheques, provided that cash payment and payments by way of cash<br />
cheque may be made exceptional reasons only.<br />
Ensure that the entity complies with its statutory commitments and that the available working<br />
capital is managed effectively and economically in terms of any prescribed cash<br />
management and Investment framework, and that the entity has and implements a supply<br />
chain management policy in accordance with relevant legislations in a way that is fair,<br />
equitable, transparent and cost- effective.<br />
Irregular or fruitless and wasteful expenditure<br />
On discovery or realisation of any irregular expenditure or any fruitless and wasteful<br />
expenditure ,the entity report in writing to the municipal manager ,mayor and the Auditor<br />
General the particulars of the expenditure ;and any steps that have been taken to recover<br />
the expenditure and prevent a recurrence of same.<br />
Invoices receiving<br />
Invoices and payments certificates are registered in the register when submitted and are<br />
stamped with the stamp marked received.<br />
Invoices and payment certificates are further checked for completeness and manual<br />
authorisation.<br />
Invoices payments<br />
Payments are electronically processed on the financial system and Electronic payments are<br />
effected to providers.<br />
3.6.10. Summary overview of the MTREF<br />
Table 98: Summary overview of the MTREF<br />
Description Adjustment<br />
Budget 2012/13<br />
Budget year<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
Budget year +1<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15<br />
Budget year +2<br />
2015/16<br />
Total operating<br />
revenue<br />
Total operating<br />
expenditure<br />
Surplus/Deficit<br />
for the year<br />
447 009 289 505 264 396 531 788 796 610 164 382<br />
530 024 043 578 874 456 575 157 016 605 086 413<br />
83 0<strong>14</strong> 753 73 610 060 43 368 219 5 077 970
<strong>23</strong>8<br />
Total Capital<br />
Expenditure<br />
673 716 682 849 317 000 1 129 346 390 1 256 556 724<br />
3.7. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
Introduction<br />
The SDM has achieved remarkable progress in institutionalizing and implementing its<br />
communication and consultation mechanisms and processes. The <strong>District</strong> Communication<br />
Strategy has been adopted in 2005 and it is in the process of being reviewed. The medium<br />
for communication is highlighted and includes Mayoral Community Outreaches, <strong>District</strong><br />
newsletters, Annual Report, Local and National Newspapers, Provincial and Local radio<br />
stations, Flyers, Ward Committee system, Community Development Workers (CDWs), as<br />
well as loud-hailing.<br />
The <strong>District</strong> improves on good governance and public participation through focus on internal<br />
audit, risk management, public participation, communications and performance management<br />
among others.<br />
3.7.1. Internal Audit<br />
Introduction<br />
Primary role of Internal Audit is to assist the municipality to accomplish its objectives by<br />
bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of<br />
risk management, control and governance processes.<br />
The risk management function involves the evaluation of the effectiveness of risk<br />
management processes as implemented by the council.<br />
Status Quo<br />
· Control<br />
It assists the organization in maintaining effective systems of internal control by evaluating<br />
their effectiveness and efficiency.<br />
· Governance Processes<br />
We assess and make appropriate recommendations for improving the governance process<br />
in its accomplishment of the following objectives:<br />
‣ Promoting appropriate ethics and values within the <strong>Municipality</strong>;
<strong>23</strong>9<br />
‣ Ensuring effective organizational performance management and accountability;<br />
‣ Communicating risk and control information to appropriate areas of the organization;<br />
and<br />
‣ Coordinating the activities of and communicating information among the Council,<br />
external and internal auditors, and management.<br />
These are achieved through performing the following types of Internal Audits:<br />
1. Risk Based Audits<br />
2. Performance Audits<br />
3. IT Audits<br />
4. Consulting and Advisory Services<br />
5. Management request<br />
Challenges to be addressed by Internal Audit Unit<br />
• Limitation of scope<br />
• Fallible ICT Systems<br />
• Late submission of Performance report<br />
• Unreported cases<br />
• Inefficiencies and Duplication of efforts<br />
• Inconsistent practices<br />
• Unconverged Audit Committee meetings<br />
• Uncoordinated activities<br />
3.7.2. Risk Management<br />
Introduction<br />
As a “possibility of loss”, risk permeates/spreads across all functional areas of all institutions<br />
including SDM.<br />
Through the process of undertaking various activities towards achievement of our objectives,<br />
SDM is expected as per MFMA Act 56 of 2003, MSA of 2000 and PFMA Act 1 of 1999 as<br />
amended by Act 29 of 1999 to design a process necessary and appropriate for provision of<br />
reasonable assurance regarding achievement of SDM’s set objectives.<br />
Risk Management is now regarded as part of the overall infrastructural improvement geared<br />
towards attainment of effective and efficient Corporate Governance regime.<br />
Status Quo<br />
Because of this recognition, SDM has established a risk management unit tasked with the<br />
responsibility of inculcating a sound corporate governance culture, ensuring best practice<br />
and integrated approach to practicing of risk management within SDM.
240<br />
The above is done in order to ensure that risk is managed on an ongoing basis through<br />
control activities that occur throughout the institution, at all levels and in all functions areas.<br />
SDM finds it appropriate to implement Enterprise Risk Management in order to:<br />
- Improve governance<br />
- Improve operational efficiency and effectiveness<br />
- Improve identification of opportunities and threats<br />
- Comply with legal requirements and international norms<br />
- Increase the likelihood of achievement of set objectives<br />
- Minimize losses<br />
- Improve institutional resilience<br />
- Be aware of the need to identify and treat risk throughout the institution<br />
- Improve stakeholder confidence and trust<br />
- Establish solid basis for decision-making and planning<br />
- Improve loss prevention and incident management<br />
- Encourage proactive management<br />
- Improve financial reporting<br />
- Appropriately allocate and use resource of risk treatment<br />
- Enhance Occupational Health and Safety performance, as well as protection of the<br />
environment.<br />
Challenges<br />
· Slow process of implementation of the Risk Management Policy<br />
· Approval and Implementation of a Risk Management Implementation Plan<br />
· Non-existence of Risk Management IT System/Infrastructure<br />
· Disintegrated Approach to Risk Management<br />
· Integration of Risk Management Committee functions into the current Audit<br />
Committee<br />
· The reviewal of the Fraud and Anti-corruption Strategy<br />
3.7.3. Public Participation<br />
Introduction<br />
Municipalities are by law required to foster public participation and ensure its<br />
citizenry is engaged in matters of governance. SDM place public participation<br />
and accountability at the centre of its work. The <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted a<br />
Public Participation Policy Framework which encompasses an ongoing public<br />
participation programme.
241<br />
Purpose: To facilitate public participation, public relations and participatory<br />
democracy.<br />
Functions of Public Participation:<br />
- Coordinate public participation and stakeholder engagement<br />
- Coordinate oversight visits of council committees<br />
- Compile oversight visits reports to Council<br />
Status Quo<br />
Public Participation Unit is in the Speaker’s Office. It has a complement of 4 personnel, a<br />
Manager, Public Participation Officer and 2 Public Participation Coordinators.<br />
SDM has a Public Participation Policy Framework that has been adopted by council.<br />
<strong>Review</strong> of the policy is done annually.<br />
The objectives of the policy are as follows;<br />
· Meet the legal requirements around community participation that are spelled out in<br />
the Municipal systems Act No. 32 of 2000.<br />
· Build an open, transparent and accountable system of governance.<br />
· Develop a culture of community participation through creating conditions for local<br />
communities to participate in the affairs of the municipality.<br />
· Assist vulnerable groups to participate effectively in the system of local government.<br />
· Provide clear, sufficient and timeous information concerning community participation<br />
to communities.<br />
· Communicate decisions of Council.<br />
· Communicate public notices of meetings for communities in a manner that promotes<br />
optimal public participation.<br />
· Set up systems and mechanisms that will ensure compliance with regulations and<br />
guidelines that may be issued from National or Provincial Government.<br />
The Public Participation policy framework spells out the roles and responsibilities of;<br />
· Council,<br />
· Executive Mayor,<br />
· The Speaker,<br />
· Portfolio and Standing Committees,<br />
· Ward Councilors,<br />
· Management and Administration,<br />
· The Public (Ward Committees) and<br />
· Community Development Workers
242<br />
SDM public participation take place through;<br />
· Mayoral Imbizos<br />
· Speaker’s outreach<br />
· <strong>IDP</strong>’s<br />
Ward Committees/Community Development Workers (CDWs)<br />
Ward Committees are important structures that are at the heart of communities and are used<br />
to enhance community participation in the affairs of the municipalities. The SDM has<br />
successfully launched 116 ward committees in the <strong>District</strong>. There is still a challenge of<br />
ensuring that they are motivated to effectively assist their communities. The other major<br />
challenges are resignation, lack of resources, transportation in vast wards, low literacy levels<br />
and in some cases lack of clarity in terms of their roles and responsibilities in their respective<br />
areas. It is within the ward committee system that the district expects community<br />
participation to be effective particularly during the <strong>IDP</strong> consultation period. It is therefore<br />
imperative that ward committees should get support and capacity building through training.<br />
Apart from the ward committees, there are the CDWs that are an integral part of the ward<br />
committee system in this exercise of assisting communities to achieve their needs. The<br />
CDWs help communities and the municipalities to fast-track delivery of services and the<br />
eradication of poverty. The province has deployed 115 CDWs to the <strong>District</strong> to assist<br />
communities on developmental issues. The only challenge which is there with this structure<br />
is that it exclude some communities while others communities have more than one CDW in a<br />
ward.<br />
Challenges to be addressed by the PP Unit<br />
· Stakeholder management policy<br />
· Speaker’s outreach<br />
· Geographic Names Change PP programmes<br />
3.7.4. Communications, Executive Support and Special Programmes<br />
Introduction<br />
The SDM has achieved remarkable progress in institutionalizing and implementing its<br />
communication and consultation mechanisms and processes. The <strong>District</strong> Communication<br />
Strategy has been adopted in 2005, reviewed in 2011 for a five year term of office for the<br />
current council (2011-2016). The medium for communication is highlighted and includes<br />
Mayoral Community Outreaches, <strong>District</strong> newsletters, Annual Report, Local and National<br />
Newspapers, Provincial and Local radio stations, Flyers, Ward Committee system,<br />
Community Development Workers (CDWs), as well as loud-hailing.
243<br />
The district has established a functional district communicators forum which coordinate, align<br />
and streamline wide government programmes involving sector departments, municipalities<br />
and other government Institutions.<br />
Status Quo<br />
Community Feedback Meetings<br />
The <strong>District</strong> engages stakeholders like traditional leaders, business, labour, civil society,<br />
sector groups etc. in matters affecting them in their different areas of responsibilities. This<br />
community feedback programme assist in the improvement of communication and<br />
interaction between the district, local municipalities and broader community on issues of<br />
service delivery and development. Local municipalities are visited during FORA, Imbizo and<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> consultations.<br />
Media Liaison (Electronic and print Media)<br />
The SDM utilizes both electronic and print media to improve and broaden communication in<br />
the area of its jurisdiction. It also uses national and local Radios. Although loud-hailing is an<br />
effective way of conveying message to communities, the SDM also uses radio for advertising<br />
meetings, workshops, conferences, summits and other functions.<br />
Communication is also done through print media in the form of external and internal<br />
newsletters, local, regional and national newspapers and websites. The <strong>District</strong> produces<br />
newsletters on monthly and quarterly basis and when a need for special print medium<br />
communication arises.<br />
An exciting initiative in the current financial year has been the innovation and commitment to<br />
support local content in the form of bulk media buying for both print and electronic media. A<br />
total of eight (08) media houses benefited, three radio stations and five newspapers.<br />
Promotional Materials<br />
Promotional materials like note-pads, pens, posters, flyers and banners are used by the<br />
<strong>District</strong> to reinforce the flow and the dissemination of information to the broader society of<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. Some of these promotional materials are distributed during <strong>District</strong> events to<br />
encourage and motivate effective community participation.<br />
The communication unit has been able to implement the decision on austerity measures on<br />
cutting expensive promotional materials such as t-shirts.<br />
Youth Development<br />
The SDM has adequately addressed youth development through the appointment of special<br />
personnel to deal directly with youth issues. It is in this office where developmental issues
244<br />
like unemployment, lack of housing, poverty, shortage of skills, high levels of crime and<br />
violence, social and family disintegration and other social ills like HIV/AIDS that affect youth<br />
are addressed. It is within this background that youth development strategy should be<br />
developed to assist young people to deal with issues that affect them as unemployed,<br />
unskilled, vulnerable and under-resourced. Resources should be biasely channeled towards<br />
the development of young people’s projects for their upliftment to stop the escalation of<br />
crime and violence.<br />
Women Empowerment<br />
Women empowerment is a phenomenon that is high on the agenda of the SDM. At present<br />
the district has 49% representation of women Mayors in the district. The SDM is one of the<br />
<strong>District</strong>s in Limpopo that has elevated the status of women in municipal governance. Women<br />
should be encouraged to partake in developmental projects that would assist them to get out<br />
of the poverty line that they found themselves in. This means that resources should be<br />
channeled in the direction of women empowerment projects in order to empower them<br />
economically and politically.<br />
Children’s Development programmes<br />
The Office of the Executive Mayor’s Special Programs support children development through<br />
· Support to Early Childhood development Centre’s with Groceries and learning<br />
materials<br />
· Annual celebration of children’s day<br />
Challenges encountered in children’s programs are<br />
· Unorganized children sector makes it difficult for mobilization of support<br />
· Lack of early childhood facilities in our communities<br />
· Lack of resources to support community initiatives and programs on children’s<br />
development<br />
Aged Development Programmes<br />
· Celebration of Social Development Month<br />
· Mandela Day Celebration and campaign<br />
· Ongoing support to pension committees and events for the elderly<br />
Traditional Leadership<br />
Historically, the institution of traditional leadership has been relegated to the periphery of<br />
development. Land was developed by the traditional leaders to participate in the decision
245<br />
make exercise of their own destiny. Their communities blamed them of their<br />
unscrupulousness and their lack of vision in the future. The new political dispensation has<br />
brought another side of this institution that shows that they have been the makers of their<br />
own history in the past and they should be given opportunity to play their role. The SDM has<br />
played a significant role in making sure that traditional leadership is broad on board to assist<br />
in bringing service delivery to their communities. The SDM is confident to pronounce that the<br />
relationship between itself, the institution and all local municipalities is healthy. The<br />
challenge which is there is on who should be the custodian of development in their areas of<br />
jurisdiction. They do not agree with democratically elected municipal structures in the<br />
delivery of services. They prefer partnership rather than exclusionary type of development.<br />
IGR and International Relations<br />
The Constitution of the republic of South Africa has declared that the government should<br />
have three layers which are Local, Provincial and National spheres. These three spheres<br />
should be interdependent, interrelated and independent. It is therefore indicated that all<br />
organs of state should promote and facilitate intergovernmental relations within the context<br />
of cooperative governance. This is done to encourage information sharing. In terms of<br />
International Relations, the SDM has a Twinning Agreement with the City of Johannesburg<br />
and it is forging relations with Botswana.<br />
A. Challenges of this area<br />
· Poor coordination of special programmes intervention by all government<br />
Institutions<br />
· Under-Funding of programmes targeting vulnerable groups<br />
· Special programmes still seen as a peripheral issue<br />
· Communication not reaching all the targeted people<br />
3.7.5. Performance Management System (PMS)<br />
Introduction<br />
PMS is simply a system of managing performance. It provides a set of tools and techniques<br />
to plan, monitor, measure and review performance of the organization and individuals. The<br />
system ensures that all parts of the organization work together to achieve the goals and<br />
targets of the organization. Performance Management System and the <strong>IDP</strong> process are<br />
seamlessly integrated. Whereas the <strong>IDP</strong> fulfills the planning stage of Performance<br />
Management, Performance Management intern fulfills the implementation management,<br />
monitoring and evaluation of the <strong>IDP</strong>. PMS should provide diagnostic signals of the potential<br />
risks that are likely linked to implementation of the <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />
Status Quo
246<br />
- PMS in SDM, regardless of not having a PMS Manager since 2012, is doing fairly<br />
well<br />
- Compliance is adhered to at all times. Though we have challenges now and then of<br />
late submission of reports to CoGHSTA due to reasons beyond our control, SDM<br />
does strive to comply at all times;<br />
Challenges<br />
- Setting unrealistic targets;<br />
- Late submission of reports;<br />
- Negative perceptions and attitudes with regard to performance in general;<br />
- PMS Manager’s post has been vacant since 2011.<br />
3.7.6. High Level Delivery Areas Status Quo for 2012-<strong>2013</strong><br />
Table 99: High level delivery areas status quo for 2012-13<br />
Key high level delivery Detailed activities Status quo 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />
areas<br />
Provision of executive<br />
support services<br />
2 youth programme held<br />
Monitor the implementation<br />
and impact of special<br />
programmes<br />
· Provide strategic<br />
linkages for special<br />
programmes<br />
· Facilitate youth,<br />
children and women<br />
empowerment<br />
· Advocate for<br />
integration of people<br />
living with disability in<br />
economic and social<br />
transformation<br />
2 children events held<br />
3 people living disability<br />
programmes held<br />
2 women programmes held<br />
80% implementation of<br />
communication strategy<br />
undertaken<br />
3 strategic events held<br />
Management of<br />
communication services<br />
· Monitor effective<br />
communication and<br />
marketing services<br />
· Promote public<br />
relations<br />
· Coordinate events<br />
management<br />
12 Mayoral committee<br />
sessions held<br />
Render administrative<br />
support to Executive<br />
· Coordinate and liaise<br />
with external<br />
stakeholders on<br />
behalf of the
247<br />
Render administration<br />
support<br />
Internal audit<br />
Risk management<br />
executive<br />
Customer care services<br />
· Provide customer<br />
care services<br />
· Render call center<br />
services<br />
· Attend to customer<br />
enquiries<br />
Public participation<br />
· Facilitate public<br />
participation and<br />
public relations<br />
Secretariat<br />
· Provide support to<br />
council<br />
· Maintain records for<br />
council<br />
· Provide secretariat<br />
services to council<br />
To provide with an<br />
independent, objective<br />
assurance and consulting<br />
activity designed to add<br />
value and improve an<br />
organisation’s controls, risk<br />
management and<br />
governance processes<br />
through:<br />
· Regularity audits<br />
· Performance audits<br />
· Information<br />
systems/IT audits<br />
· Investigations and<br />
adhoc reports<br />
To manage risk management<br />
function in line with corporate<br />
management strategy by<br />
undertaking:<br />
· Risk assessment<br />
10 public consultations on<br />
annual report held<br />
4 training programmes for<br />
councillors undertaken<br />
6 oversight reports issued<br />
12 speaker’s outreach held<br />
100% compilation of council<br />
agenda completed<br />
24 internal audit reports<br />
issued<br />
4 performance audit reports<br />
issued<br />
4 ICT audit reports issued<br />
100% approval of internal<br />
audit plan and<br />
implementation completed<br />
4 adhoc reports issued<br />
100% approval of internal<br />
audit methodology and<br />
charters<br />
100% internal control<br />
mechanisms undertaken<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> risk assessment<br />
undertaken<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> project risk<br />
assessment undertaken
248<br />
· Risk financing<br />
· Anti-fraud and<br />
corruption measures<br />
· Risk control<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> project survey<br />
done<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>2013</strong> insurance policy<br />
reviewed<br />
Integrated Development<br />
Planning<br />
Preparation of process plan<br />
for <strong>IDP</strong><br />
Compile <strong>IDP</strong><br />
Facilitate community<br />
participation processes<br />
Liaise with sector<br />
departments for alignment<br />
purposes<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> excess and<br />
insurance repairs done<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> security<br />
operations assessment<br />
completed<br />
Approved business continuity<br />
framework and business<br />
continuity plan<br />
Risk management training<br />
conducted<br />
Risk management reports<br />
issued<br />
Process plan for 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />
<strong>IDP</strong> done<br />
Public consultations for<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> done<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> 2012/<strong>2013</strong> approved by<br />
council
249<br />
CHAPTER 4:<br />
STRATEGY PHASE
250<br />
4.1. VISION<br />
“Development oriented Leader in Service Delivery”<br />
4.2. MISSION<br />
We provide creative integrated development solutions in partnership with Local<br />
Municipalities, Communities and other stakeholders through:<br />
- a coordinated framework for district development planning;<br />
- fostering active community involvement<br />
- creating a learning organization conducive for development of human capital;<br />
- enhancing sound intergovernmental relations through good governance;<br />
- equitable distribution of resources.<br />
4.3. CORE VALUES OF THE MUNICIPALITY (BATHO PELE<br />
PRINCIPLES)<br />
Institutions in every environment are governed by a set of core values that bind both political<br />
and administrative personnel. The <strong>District</strong> regards the below mentioned core values as the<br />
cornerstone that should guide the municipality in conducting its affairs as per the <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />
· Transparency<br />
· Access<br />
· Courtesy<br />
· Efficiency<br />
· Value for money<br />
· professionalism<br />
· Redress<br />
4.4. MAYORAL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES<br />
· Economic Growth, Development and Job Creation<br />
· Access to Basic Services and Infrastructure Development<br />
· Community Development and Social Cohesion<br />
· Spatial Development and Sustainable Land Use Management<br />
· Active Community Participation and Inter-Governmental Co-operation<br />
· Effective, Accountable and Clean Government.
251<br />
4.4.1. Economic Growth, Development and Job Creation<br />
Envisaged outputs<br />
Development should be people-centered and not a government driven scenario wherein<br />
communities are recipients of government services. Building an increased prosperity for all<br />
residents, sustainable job and income generation and better distribution of wealth, is central<br />
to the municipality’s challenges. In order to ensure this objective it is thus critical that people<br />
participate in the main stream economy of the <strong>District</strong> and the social development of<br />
communities. This will ensure that communities of the district are part of service delivery as<br />
active agents.<br />
Key programmes:<br />
Among programmes to be engaged in this exercise are:<br />
· Enterprise Development<br />
· Agricultural Development<br />
· Tourism Development<br />
· Mining Development<br />
· Marketing<br />
· Investment Attraction<br />
· Expanded Public Works Programmes<br />
· People’s Skills Development<br />
4.4.2. Access to Basic Services and Infrastructure<br />
Envisaged outputs:<br />
Provision of infrastructure also pays an important role in the social and economic<br />
development of communities. Areas without access to infrastructure are characterized by<br />
high levels of poverty whilst those with access are well off. Absence of infrastructure for any<br />
kind of services worsens the poverty levels of communities as much as it hampers<br />
development.<br />
The municipality is therefore faced with two challenges in this area:<br />
- First is the issue of extending access to basic municipal services (water, sanitation,<br />
electricity and solid waste removal to communities with access.<br />
- The second issue relate to the general provisioning and maintenance of<br />
infrastructure and services over the municipal area.<br />
Key programmes:
252<br />
• In terms of this priority the municipality will develop the following programmes:<br />
• Free basic services programme<br />
• Access to municipal services to areas without<br />
• Water services provisioning and maintenance<br />
• Solid Waste Removal<br />
• Electricity provisioning<br />
• Transport<br />
• Roads<br />
• Storm-water<br />
4.4.3. Community Development and Social Cohesion<br />
Envisaged outputs:<br />
Community development is a critical challenge facing the municipality in an attempt to create<br />
a stable and cohesive community.<br />
Key Programmes:<br />
To this end the following programmes will be embarked upon by the municipality:<br />
· Environmental Management<br />
· Primary Health Care<br />
· Sports Development<br />
· Gender Equity<br />
· Aged Care<br />
· Skills Development<br />
· Disaster Management<br />
· Safety and Security<br />
4.4.4. Spatial Development and Sustainable Land Use Management<br />
Envisaged outputs:<br />
The desired development requires resources to happen of which among them is land. Land<br />
unlike other resources is a finite resource which has to be addressed strategically. The<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Municipal area has its own dynamics related to land as most of the land for<br />
development is under land restitution claims. It is thus critical that concerted efforts be<br />
embarked upon by the municipality to facilitate access to land for sustainable development<br />
as well as usage.<br />
Key Programmes:<br />
As a result the following will be among the key programmes:
253<br />
· Spatial planning to guide sustainable development;<br />
· Support programmes for beneficiaries of land restitution claims;<br />
· Undertaking of land audits to identify land for various kinds of development;<br />
· Facilitate the development of framework for land use management;<br />
· Trainings and consultation sessions with various stakeholders on land use management<br />
practices.<br />
4.4.5. Active Community Participation and Inter-governmental Alignment<br />
Envisaged outputs:<br />
Government programmes ought to be communicated to its communities so as they can<br />
measure the performance of government and hold it accountable. The municipality wishes to<br />
engage in a contract with its communities in addressing the challenge of poverty,<br />
unemployment, and service delivery. In this case the municipality will ensure that proper<br />
structures are put in where government will plan with the communities and monitor<br />
implementation. A clear communications framework will thus be instituted by the<br />
municipality.<br />
Key Programme:<br />
The focus on this programme will be:<br />
• Functionality of all communication structures representing communities as well as all<br />
stakeholders,<br />
• Working with community development workers in communicating planned and<br />
implemented government programmes,<br />
• Monitoring of government programmes on their social and economic impact.<br />
• Furthermore in accordance with the spirit of co-operative governance as well as the<br />
legislative requirements, the municipality will work with local municipalities; provincial<br />
and national sector departments to ensure that development is integrated, duplication<br />
is avoided; and synergy is enhanced. To realize this objective the municipality will set<br />
proper institutional structures and mechanisms to ensure that such co-operation is<br />
not ad-hoc.<br />
4.4.6. Accountable and Clean Government<br />
Envisaged outcome/outputs<br />
The development of institutional capacity is a key priority to ensure that the <strong>District</strong> is<br />
equipped with high-quality staff that ensures that government programmes are implemented<br />
according to set targets.
254<br />
Key programmes:<br />
In this area of priority the <strong>District</strong> will focus on:<br />
· Recruitment and selection of high-quality and committed staff<br />
· The retention of staff<br />
· The development of the skills of its staff<br />
· Engaging in partnerships with strategic partners<br />
· Organizational Development<br />
· Human Resource Administration and Maintenance<br />
· The development of administrative systems<br />
· Secretariat and Administration Services<br />
· Information Management<br />
· Internal Communication<br />
· Performance Management<br />
· Customer care<br />
Government programmes cannot be realized if they are not backed by financial resources.<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> is faced with mammoth development challenges amidst limited<br />
resources. It is therefore paramount that the existing resources are well managed whilst<br />
striving for the mobilization of extra resources. In order to do so the municipality will<br />
specifically focus on:<br />
· Development of a financial management plan<br />
· Strengthening of revenue collection capacity<br />
· Revenue generation<br />
· Credit Control mechanism<br />
· Financial planning and budgeting<br />
· Financial reporting<br />
· Asset Management<br />
· Financial Administration<br />
· Expenditure Management and Control<br />
· Preparation of realistic and strategic budgets<br />
· Implementation of Municipal Financial Management Act<br />
· Internal Audit<br />
· Risk Management<br />
4.5. SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
STRATEGIES
255<br />
Provision of municipal office space Construction of mini municipal offices<br />
Groblersdal<br />
Upgrading of existing building Hoep<br />
Hoep Street<br />
Construction of new offices Jane Furse<br />
GIS Training and Hardware<br />
Training of municipal officials on GIS<br />
Provision of hardware and software<br />
related to GIS<br />
Improve environmental quality Enforce environmental management<br />
tools<br />
Promote infill development<br />
Maximum use and protection of high<br />
potential Land<br />
Reduce sprawl<br />
Upgrading of tenure and formalization of<br />
informal settlements which would<br />
facilitate investment and borrowing<br />
capacity<br />
Eradication of informal settlement Encouragement of integrated and<br />
Compact Settlement<br />
Develop an integrated and sustainable<br />
transportation node that promotes a<br />
quality public realm and pedestrian<br />
movement.<br />
Refurbishment and development of<br />
infrastructure and facilities<br />
Determine priority areas for shortmedium<br />
term investment and allocation<br />
of future development<br />
Provision of appropriate housing for all<br />
social groups<br />
Improved Basic Services Delivery and<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Alignment of the SDM spatial<br />
development plan to the sector plans<br />
Perform audit and enforce municipal bylaws<br />
relating to illegal land audit<br />
Encourage tourism facilities<br />
Identify strategic land parcels for<br />
development<br />
Upgrading of tenure and formalization of<br />
informal settlements which would<br />
facilitate investment and borrowing<br />
capacity<br />
Upgrading of tenure and formalization of<br />
informal settlements which would<br />
facilitate investment and borrowing<br />
capacity<br />
Assess the aspects of compatibility and<br />
possible contradiction which would then<br />
be addressed<br />
4.6. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL<br />
TRANSFORMATION
256<br />
4.6.1. Employee wellness<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Effective and efficient management of<br />
workplace hazards<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Organize recreational activities<br />
4.6.2. Occupational health and safety<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
- To enhance wellness of employees<br />
- To ensure healthy and safe work<br />
environment.<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
- Through reactive and proactive<br />
wellness activities<br />
- By managing workplace hazards<br />
efficiently and effectively<br />
- Identification, investigation and<br />
submission of claims/returns to<br />
commissioner under Department of<br />
Labour<br />
- Facilitation of medical<br />
surveillance/check-ups for employees<br />
- Buildings inspection and audit of<br />
municipal service areas (buildings<br />
and service points)<br />
- By conducting regular wellness<br />
campaigns<br />
- By managing injuries in the<br />
workplace<br />
4.6.3. Information and Communication Technology (ICT)<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Establish ICT as a business driver<br />
To reduce the digital divide throughout the<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
To fully get all systems to integrate and<br />
databases of the various systems to<br />
communicate<br />
To reduce ICT Risks<br />
To reduce ICT Audit Queries through the<br />
development of a proper ICT Strategy.<br />
To adopt an ICT Framework through which<br />
ICT can be governed<br />
To put a proper ICT Disaster Recovery<br />
Strategy in place and to ensure the<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
By conducting needs analysis<br />
By maintaining ICT infrastructure<br />
By improving ICT security<br />
By developing a Master Plan<br />
By establishing sound regulatory<br />
environment<br />
By extending ICT Infrastructure <strong>District</strong> wide<br />
By implementing the E-Governance Strategy
257<br />
effectiveness thereof<br />
To replace all redundant equipment as<br />
identified and appoint a service provider to<br />
speed up the turn-around time<br />
By developing a proper ICT Strategy for<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> in line with<br />
the E-Governance Strategy<br />
To budget properly for each financial year By adopting an ICT Framework for<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
To improve on the turn-around time for enduser<br />
By maintaining ICT infrastructure<br />
support<br />
To reduce ICT expenditure by implementing By extending ICT Infrastructure <strong>District</strong> wide<br />
Shared Services throughout the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
To have an effective Information and By maintaining ICT infrastructure<br />
Communication Technology in place<br />
4.6.4. Human Resources Management (HRM)<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Provision of sound human resources<br />
functions<br />
To recruit competent personnel<br />
To reduce staff turnover<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
By implementing HR Plan<br />
By implementing employment equity targets<br />
By reviewing and implementing human<br />
resources systems<br />
By developing and implementing careerpathing<br />
plans<br />
By reviewing and implementing Retention<br />
strategy<br />
By filling vacant posts and improving service<br />
benefits<br />
Implementation of retention strategy<br />
To effectively and efficiently administer leave<br />
management<br />
To ensure that correct salaries and third<br />
party payments are done on time<br />
To ensure compliance with Employment<br />
Equity Plan (EEP)<br />
To ensure compliance to HR policies<br />
Implementing ESS and manual system<br />
efficiently<br />
Use VIP and Cash Focus systems for<br />
payments<br />
Implementation of numeric targets as per<br />
EEP<br />
Implement SALGA collective agreements<br />
and relevant pieces of legislation<br />
4.6.5. Auxiliary Services<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Provide sound records management<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
By reviewing the file plan
258<br />
To provide safe-keeping of the records (files<br />
and tender documents)<br />
To promote clean audit in the SDM<br />
To provide distribution of information through<br />
messenger services internally and externally<br />
To provide printing and photocopying<br />
services<br />
By implementing the Electronic Document<br />
Management System<br />
By disposing of records<br />
By archiving records of value<br />
By auditing personnel files<br />
Separation of printing and photocopying<br />
office from Records Office<br />
Provision of registers for outgoing and<br />
incoming records<br />
Electronic storage of documents<br />
Schedule of delivering and collecting mail<br />
internally<br />
Determining a schedule of types of records<br />
the SDM has<br />
<strong>Review</strong> the file plan<br />
Disposing and archiving of records<br />
By managing and auditing personnel files<br />
4.6.6. Legal Services<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
To provide effective and efficient legal<br />
services<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
By appointing a panel of attorneys<br />
By providing legal support to departments<br />
By providing legislative updates<br />
Effective communication and flow of<br />
information between legal services and<br />
affected departments<br />
Gaps in the procedure manual that is in<br />
place filled to address the challenges<br />
Advise various departments to make<br />
requests for opinions in writing<br />
To expeditiously attend to all legal queries<br />
affecting the institution in order to avoid<br />
unnecessary litigations<br />
Provide Council with Legislative review<br />
updates report in order for institution to be in<br />
line new legislative trends.<br />
Request various departments consult legal<br />
services timeously to avoid unnecessary<br />
litigations<br />
Update Council as well as the departments<br />
on Legislative <strong>Review</strong> Updates<br />
4.6.7. Labour Relations<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
STRATEGIES
259<br />
Promotion of sound labour relations<br />
To maintain harmonious relationship<br />
between the employer and employees<br />
To consciountise employee about<br />
labour related matters<br />
To ensure that the employer and<br />
employee representatives have<br />
common understanding<br />
To promote orderly collective<br />
bargaining<br />
To promote effective and efficient<br />
resolution of labour disputes<br />
To give effect to the provisions of<br />
Labour Relations Act<br />
To conscientize employees on labour<br />
matters<br />
By conducting awareness on labour<br />
relations<br />
By maintaining a functional Labour<br />
Relations Forum<br />
Educate employees about labour<br />
relations matters<br />
Facilitate negotiations between<br />
employer and employee<br />
representatives<br />
Strike management<br />
Labour related training to ensure that<br />
managers carry out their duties without<br />
fear or favour<br />
Develop relationship with all five local<br />
municipalities<br />
Educate employees about labour<br />
relations matters<br />
4.6.8. Organisational Development (OD)<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
To improve institutional productivity<br />
To continuously analyze the performance of<br />
the organizational structure in order to apply<br />
appropriate OD interventions<br />
To continuously assess respective<br />
departments on their quarterly reports or<br />
observations<br />
To design forms for efficiency and<br />
effectiveness<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
By improving and implementing business<br />
processes<br />
By evaluating the organisational structure<br />
By conducting culture surveys<br />
By conducting job evaluations<br />
By implementing performance management<br />
framework<br />
Apply total quality management<br />
Business processes be developed and<br />
implemented for the entire municipality<br />
Conduct job evaluation<br />
4.6.9. Human Resources Development (HRD)<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
To equip the people of SDM with skills for<br />
participation in the mainstream economy<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
By developing and submitting the Workplace<br />
Skills Plan to LGSETA
260<br />
By identifying skills programmes and<br />
including them in the Workplace Skills Plan<br />
To provide learners who completed their<br />
studies with experience and complete their<br />
workplace experience<br />
To assist employees to acquire recognised<br />
qualification on experience gained in the<br />
workplace<br />
To capacitate newly elected Councillors<br />
By creating opportunities for experiential<br />
learning<br />
By assessing the impact of training<br />
interventions<br />
4.7. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE<br />
4.7.1. Water<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Provision of water supply to all Develop, Implement & Completion of 50%<br />
of bulk water projects<br />
To implement an Incidents Register and Implementation of water reticulation<br />
Effective resolution of water supply incidents (65% of backlog)<br />
To ensure effective operations of Bulk Water<br />
Services<br />
To effectively provide Water through Water<br />
Tankers<br />
To provide Safe disposal of Waste Water<br />
To ensure effective management of SLAs with<br />
Water Services Providers (WSPs)<br />
To develop an Integrated Asset Management<br />
Plan<br />
To review WSDP<br />
To develop Water and Sanitation Master Plans<br />
To efficiently manage the MIG Programme<br />
To efficiently manage RBIG and RBIG Special<br />
Programme<br />
To efficiently manage the ACIP Programme<br />
To efficiently manage the DWA refurbishment<br />
Programme<br />
To develop a Water Conservation and Water<br />
Demand Management Plan<br />
To develop close-out reports on Incomplete<br />
roads projects<br />
To effectively complete activities of the Annual<br />
Implementation Plan on Rural Roads Asset<br />
Management (R-RAMS)<br />
Implement a Water Conservation and<br />
Water Demand Management Strategy<br />
(Reduce nonrevenue water to 40%)<br />
Achieve 95% Blue Drop rating<br />
Eradication of supply through tankers<br />
50%<br />
Achieve70% Green Drop rating<br />
Annual review and implementation of<br />
WSDP<br />
Improve implementation and monitoring<br />
Conduct a study on water demand and<br />
conservation<br />
Follow-up and finalise issues on incomplete<br />
roads projects<br />
Follow up and finalise on issues of R-RAMS
261<br />
To effectively control internal resources<br />
(Human; Financial; etc.)<br />
Improve on monitoring of work done<br />
4.7.2. Sanitation<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Provision of sanitation services to all<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Completion of bulk Sanitation Projects<br />
Provision of household sanitation<br />
facilities (60% of backlog)<br />
Achieve70% Green Drop rating<br />
4.7.3. Disaster Management<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
To provide for an integrated and<br />
coordinate disaster management policy<br />
that focuses on preventing or reducing<br />
the risk of disasters<br />
Institutional capacity in disaster<br />
Management<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Compile specifications mitigating the<br />
severity of disasters, emergency<br />
preparedness, rapid and effective<br />
response to disasters and post<br />
disaster recovery for tender<br />
Design job content and submit to HR<br />
To decrease overtime expenditure.<br />
Create employment and avoid staff<br />
being over worked<br />
Recruitment and selection<br />
Interviews and appointment<br />
Advertise posts and speed up<br />
appointments of qualified incumbents<br />
To avoid litigation. Failure to respond<br />
adequately. Comply to norms and<br />
standards<br />
To use the correct vehicle for a defined<br />
function. Respond appropriately to veld<br />
and forest fires. Reduce the response<br />
time<br />
<strong>District</strong> has an obligation to render the<br />
service in these areas. Fear of loss of<br />
Match the risk by employing more fire<br />
fighter and provide for resources<br />
Extend the water services contract to<br />
EMS. Specifications will be provided.<br />
Apply for MIG funding. Ask funding
262<br />
life and property. Fear of possible<br />
litigation. Places are far from the<br />
existing fire departments<br />
Save lives and property<br />
To avail classrooms occupied by<br />
instructors and disaster officers. Better<br />
record and information management<br />
Compliance to the provisions of DMA<br />
To reduce the response time. To save<br />
life and property. Accessibility of the<br />
service to the SDM population<br />
To have the head of the training<br />
centre. To fulfill the LGSETA<br />
requirement on accreditation and<br />
evaluation and monitoring<br />
Required by the ministerial<br />
proclamation that a service will have<br />
fire safety officers to deal with issues<br />
of fire prevention. To enforce the EMS<br />
by-laws. To ensure sustainable<br />
development<br />
To increase the EMS fleet<br />
To comply with enabler 1. Build DRM<br />
information. To comply to DMA section<br />
44 ( c) – must act as a repository of,<br />
and conduit for, information concerning<br />
disasters, impending disasters and<br />
disaster management in the municipal<br />
area<br />
To fulfill all the KPAs and the enablers.<br />
To manage the centre. Response to<br />
incidents.<br />
from the mining communities<br />
Establishing satellite stations/fire<br />
houses<br />
Apply for MIG funding and build an<br />
office block at the fire station, space is<br />
available<br />
Acquire land around Jane Furse.<br />
COGHSTA Limpopo is willing to fund<br />
the centre<br />
Identify and rent space. Build satellite<br />
or fire houses. Use volunteers in terms<br />
of the volunteer policy<br />
Create, advertise and appoint the head<br />
of centre<br />
Have an Organogram that has the<br />
head of the training academy and link<br />
each instructor to the fields available<br />
at training<br />
Use money paid off by insurance to<br />
fund another EMS vehicle. Pay lease<br />
of fleet with the money paid off<br />
Add five (5) officers to deal with the<br />
remaining KPAs and the Enabler 1 and<br />
2. GIS specialist<br />
Develop an Organogram that has fire<br />
prevention added to it. Headed by a<br />
divisional officer with five inspectors
263<br />
The field workers being efficient.<br />
Increase communication effectiveness<br />
and mobility in the shortage of pool<br />
vehicles<br />
To sustain the buildings and keep the<br />
working place safe for employees<br />
Apply the cell phone allowance and car<br />
allowance policies without<br />
discrimination<br />
Delegate financial powers of R500.00<br />
to the Director Community Services<br />
and they be allowed to procure on a<br />
manual order of three quotations<br />
Budget for the soft and hard ware<br />
4.7.4. Environmental Management<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> needs to have more of<br />
Environmental Inspectors to implement and<br />
educate all about the legislations pertinent to<br />
biodiversity and conservation on a Lahore<br />
and long term measures.<br />
Shortly SDM must starts to have more<br />
Environmental Inspector’s interns to educate<br />
the communities in the area about greening<br />
and conservation of the area including fauna<br />
and flora.<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Create positions for Environmental<br />
Management Inspectors who will also<br />
generate revenue for the district through<br />
fines<br />
Bylaws should also be promulgated relating<br />
to the subject and be passed.<br />
Employ more environment Inspectors interns<br />
Embark on an intensive campaign for<br />
education by providing resources<br />
4.7.5 Sports, Arts and Culture<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
To develop communities in Sport through<br />
mass participation<br />
To develop qualified coaches,<br />
administrators, referees and umpires within<br />
the district<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Establish athletics clubs, Train coaches.<br />
Invite professional runners. Sector Plan and<br />
Concept document available<br />
Train coaches, referees and administrator<br />
and engage stakeholders for exchange<br />
programmes. Sector Plan and Concept<br />
document available<br />
Recruit coaches, managers, Officiating<br />
Officials
264<br />
Provide sporting material and resources to<br />
Sports Academy<br />
To develop communities in Arts and Culture<br />
through mass participation<br />
Promotion of Arts and Culture within the<br />
<strong>District</strong>.<br />
To build a community culture of practicing<br />
sports and recreation as a lifestyle<br />
To preserve and promote the arts and<br />
cultures of the diverse communities of<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
To maximize available resources and obtain,<br />
where necessary, assistance from other<br />
funding agencies or private sector sources<br />
To improve the quality of life of all sections of<br />
community through effective policies on<br />
sports, arts and culture<br />
To coordinate the creation of high quality<br />
sports and recreation facilities that allows for<br />
hosting of provincial and national events<br />
Organise accredited courses<br />
Needs analysis<br />
Establish arts and culture groups<br />
Introduce new federation<br />
Establish new federations<br />
Sustain the existing federations<br />
Capacitate Artists and Crafters. Sector Plan<br />
and Arts and Culture Strategy document<br />
available<br />
Promote Cultural Activities<br />
Celebrate Heritage<br />
Promote Languages<br />
Organise Writers/Authors and Debates<br />
Recruit Artists and Crafters<br />
Train Artists and Crafters<br />
Promoting sports and recreation activities in<br />
the district<br />
Organise elderly from Wards<br />
21,1 km Race<br />
10 km Race and 10 km walk<br />
5km Fun Run<br />
Hosting events that commemorate the arts<br />
and culture of communities of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />
Organise debates in partnership with Dept.<br />
of Education and other stakeholders<br />
Sustain lifestyle strategy<br />
Integrate programmes<br />
Integrate Programmes with stakeholders<br />
Sector Plan and Arts and Culture Strategy<br />
document available<br />
4.7.6. Emergency management<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Repair and maintain equipment<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Repair and maintain equipment
265<br />
Save life, property and the environment<br />
through quick response to veld fires<br />
Effective and efficient response to all types<br />
of fire<br />
Provision of protective clothing and station<br />
uniform<br />
Provision of emergency disaster relief<br />
material to victims<br />
Encourage continued professional<br />
development and membership with<br />
professional bodies<br />
Public education, research and awareness<br />
Reduce the road fatalities and promote<br />
Arrive Alive<br />
Provide training material and resources to<br />
Training Academy<br />
Provide for training academy requirements<br />
and resources<br />
Repair of equipment as and when needed<br />
Compile list of equipment to be serviced and<br />
maintained<br />
Appointment of term contractors for<br />
servicing, maintenance and repairs<br />
Save life, property and the environment<br />
through quick response to veld fires.<br />
Effective and efficient response to all types<br />
of fire<br />
Provision of protective clothing and station<br />
uniform<br />
Develop list of protective and station uniform<br />
needed<br />
Compile list of foam and decontamination<br />
detergent types and quantities per station<br />
Provision of emergency disaster relief<br />
material to victims<br />
Appoint term contractors for supply of food<br />
and food parcels, first day of disaster<br />
happening<br />
Provide relief material as and when needed<br />
Encourage continued professional<br />
development and membership with<br />
professional bodies<br />
Develop a list of employees that are<br />
registered with professional bodies<br />
Public education, research and awareness<br />
Develop an annual program for awareness<br />
Reduce the road fatalities and promote<br />
Arrive Alive<br />
Develop an Integrated Arrive Alive<br />
Operational Plan<br />
Launch the Arrive Alive and implement the<br />
plan<br />
Provide training material and resources to<br />
Training Academy<br />
Compile specifications for training resources<br />
Provide for training academy requirements<br />
and resources<br />
Do research on the vulnerability of the<br />
<strong>District</strong> to certain hazards<br />
Request or search for funding partners
266<br />
4.7.7. Municipal Health Services<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Provision of adequate Air Quality Monitoring<br />
Facilities in the <strong>District</strong><br />
Provision of all nine functional areas<br />
constituting MHS<br />
To implement the HIV Mainstreaming<br />
strategy<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Get the existing AQMI into continuous and<br />
efficient functionality<br />
Build enough capacity to carry Atmospheric<br />
Emission Licensing function from the<br />
Province<br />
Provide additional monitoring equipment’s to<br />
other locals<br />
Compile MHS strategy and get it approved<br />
by all council structures<br />
Getting personnel acclimatised and putting<br />
systems and processes in place for full<br />
implementation of all nine programmes<br />
Gazetting of By-laws<br />
List all the days that deal with HIV/Aids<br />
Getting personnel acclimatised and putting<br />
systems and processes in place for full<br />
implementation of all nine programmes<br />
Placing them in strategic organic<br />
specialisation for future personal<br />
development<br />
4.8. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (LED)<br />
4.8.1. LED<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
To provide SMME/cooperatives support<br />
To provide Market exhibitions for SMME’s<br />
To create conducive environment for<br />
sustainable economic growth and<br />
development.<br />
Identify and explore value adding<br />
opportunities<br />
To promote the development of tourism<br />
destinations and opportunities<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Support SMME’s and cooperatives with<br />
production inputs<br />
Expose SMME’s to market exhibitions<br />
By facilitating access to markets<br />
By facilitating and promoting development of<br />
tourism destinations and products
267<br />
Seminars for local suppliers on supply chain<br />
Conduct seminars for small businesses on<br />
supply chain processes<br />
4.8.2. SDA<br />
Objectives of SDA<br />
To promote sustainable rural economies<br />
through agricultural and agro-processing<br />
development<br />
To ensure small town and settlement<br />
regeneration<br />
To develop and market key tourism clusters<br />
To develop sustainable mining communities<br />
Committed and hardworking employees<br />
Supportive and united board of directors<br />
Clear mandate encapsulated in the SDA bylaw<br />
Strategies of SDA<br />
Development of agro-processing<br />
initiatives<br />
Regeneration of small towns in<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Tourism development and marketing<br />
SLP and Enterprise Development<br />
Raise the motivation of workers<br />
Share the vision and mission of SDA<br />
Formulate the mandate in a way that is<br />
accessible to all<br />
Elaboration on strategies of SDA<br />
The <strong>2013</strong>-18 strategy makes a fundamental shift towards a programme-based approach (as<br />
against project pre-occupation) guided by the quest to maximize on spatially focused and<br />
concentrated development. Central to the thesis is to pursue an empirically based model of<br />
development in targeted spaces. The common thread to the design of projects for specific<br />
geographic locations will either be multiple infrastructure projects that are interlinked and<br />
aimed at unlocking development potential/opportunities and/or making use of an identified<br />
product with a clearly articulated value chain as a bedrock for triggering development within<br />
a particular space. Such programmes may span a number of inter-linked geographic spaces<br />
that however need to be complementary to each other.<br />
The choice to either centralize or spread investments will be determined through proper<br />
feasibility studies that take into consideration that viability of locations, cost of development<br />
and the potential to realise shared growth. SDA’s role in the game remains that of conceiving<br />
the programmes, identifying the requisite resources (both public and private), facilitating<br />
mobilization thereof and helping negotiate mutually acceptable institutional models for their<br />
execution.<br />
Below is a summary of the criteria to be used to assess appropriateness/fit of programmes;<br />
• Possess spatial character
268<br />
• Revolves around identified commodity and has potential to pursue opportunities<br />
along the value chain or could result in further development of complimentary<br />
services<br />
• Complement the development of sectors that the district has competitive advantage<br />
on<br />
• Potential for economic sustainability<br />
• Has sufficient critical support & commitment from local municipalities and SDM – be<br />
able to flow into <strong>IDP</strong>s and not solely dependent on private sector contribution<br />
• Extensive profiling and assessment is done on current developments in the targeted<br />
areas<br />
• High potential to attract private sector investment<br />
4.9. FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OBJECTIVES ON FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
STRATEGIES ON FIN.VIABILITY<br />
To ensure sufficient reserve funds to<br />
address asset renewal<br />
To ensure preparation and<br />
implementation of realistic budget for<br />
the municipality<br />
To ensure improved Audit Opinion<br />
To ensure that assets and inventory are<br />
adequately accountant for, properly<br />
recorded and safe guarded<br />
To ensure prudent expenditure<br />
management<br />
To ensure proper management of<br />
documents<br />
To ensure accurate and complete<br />
reporting of financial information<br />
To ensure sufficient revenue to address<br />
development imperatives<br />
To ensure the optimum, efficient,<br />
effective functional procurement<br />
processes<br />
Disposal of obsolete and damaged<br />
stock<br />
Preparation and monitoring of realistic<br />
budget<br />
Improve audit opinion<br />
Development of a credible asset<br />
register<br />
Improvement in capital replacement<br />
reserves<br />
Recording and valuing of all municipal<br />
inventory items<br />
Maximisation of own revenue towards<br />
Capital Replacement Reserves<br />
Process all invoices received as per<br />
service standards target date<br />
Adhering to document management<br />
process flow
269<br />
To ensure efficient and effective<br />
contract management<br />
To ensure compliance to all governance<br />
and financial management and reporting<br />
requirements<br />
Reconciliation of payroll and creditors<br />
accounts balance<br />
Percentage revenue collection from<br />
baseline<br />
To ensure timeous and accurate<br />
financial reporting<br />
To ensure a credible and realistic<br />
budget of the municipality<br />
To ensure sufficient revenue to address<br />
development imperatives<br />
To ensure the optimum, efficient,<br />
effective functional procurement<br />
processes. To ensure functional bid<br />
committees<br />
To ensure that Inventory and Assets<br />
(Movable and Immovable) is adequately<br />
accounted for, properly recorded and<br />
safeguarded<br />
To ensure BTO policies are up to date<br />
with regard to legislation<br />
To ensure prudent expenditure<br />
management<br />
To foster Intergovernmental Relations<br />
and engagements with Stakeholders<br />
To effectively control internal resources<br />
(Human; Financial; etc.)<br />
To attain Clean Audit by ensuring<br />
compliance to all governance; financial<br />
management and reporting requirements<br />
To effectively encourage a Risk free<br />
working environment<br />
Procurement of goods and services on<br />
time<br />
Compliance to Supply Chain<br />
Management policies and regulations<br />
Drafting and management of service<br />
level agreements (SLA) for all services<br />
rendered to SDM<br />
Development of GRAP compliant fixed<br />
asset register<br />
Recording, valuation of municipal<br />
assets and Unbundling of<br />
Infrastructural projects<br />
Updating of inventory register<br />
Comply with disposal processes of<br />
asset management<br />
Payment of creditors within 30 days of<br />
invoice date<br />
Converting of documents to electronic<br />
format<br />
Regular performance of expenditure<br />
reconciliations<br />
Cleansing of consumer and indigent<br />
data<br />
Improvement in revenue collection
270<br />
Development and implementation of<br />
procurement plans<br />
Revenue Enhancement<br />
Objectives on revenue enhancement<br />
To create a clean database of customers in<br />
the shortest period enhancing revenue<br />
collection<br />
To ensure that critical resources are availed<br />
to the metering project<br />
To improve accountability and traceability<br />
To improve and maintain water assets<br />
thereby reducing incidences of water losses<br />
To improve management of water losses and<br />
to account for all the unaccounted for<br />
water.<br />
To increase chances of accounting for<br />
unaccounted for water<br />
To create additional revenue<br />
To ensure that businesses and other able<br />
beneficiaries absorb some of the basic costs<br />
for activities that directly benefits them such<br />
as inspections and training<br />
To create revenue through offering<br />
valuable services<br />
Strategies on revenue enhancement<br />
Compile and verify list of all consumers<br />
within the district<br />
Negotiate prioritization of allocating<br />
payments on the respective LM’s invoices<br />
on financial systems, suggesting as follows:<br />
o Rates & taxes<br />
o Water & Sanitation<br />
o Electricity<br />
Identify areas of predominant yard<br />
connections, formalize them and bill<br />
Piloting Pre-paid meters<br />
Replacement of critical components<br />
Billing the Owners versus Tenants<br />
Implement Infrastructure refurbishment plan<br />
Developing and implementing loss<br />
management processes<br />
Performing reconciliation of water quantities<br />
produced to quantities billed on a regular<br />
basis<br />
Report on actual losses and take appropriate<br />
action to resolve or reduce these losses<br />
New bulk meters in all zones and at all water<br />
works<br />
Carry out feasibility study of possible new<br />
billable areas<br />
Carry out feasibility study of possible new<br />
billable areas<br />
Institute cost recovery strategy for current<br />
services on offer<br />
Look for new chargeable services to offer
271<br />
4.10. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
4.10.1. Internal Audit<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
• To provide independent, objective<br />
assurance and consulting services.<br />
• To assess and evaluate the municipal<br />
performance management and<br />
information.<br />
• To evaluate and improve the<br />
effectiveness of ICT controls.<br />
• To perform Investigative ad hoc<br />
assignments as requested by Council<br />
and Management.<br />
• To ensure uniform implementation of<br />
internal audit processes and structured<br />
approach.<br />
• To coordinate the activities of the audit<br />
committee.<br />
• To interact with all spheres of<br />
government<br />
• To develop the three year rolling Internal<br />
Audit Plan<br />
• To ensure uniform implementation<br />
• To coordinate the activities of the Audit<br />
committee<br />
• To procure an electronic Internal Audit<br />
working paper system<br />
• To interact with all spheres of<br />
government<br />
• To effectively control Internal resources(<br />
Human; Financial; etc.)<br />
• To attain Clean Audit by ensuring<br />
compliance to all governance; financial<br />
management and reporting requirements<br />
• To effectively encourage a Risk free<br />
working environment.<br />
• Develop and review Internal Audit charter<br />
for approval by Audit Committee and<br />
Council.<br />
• Develop and review [Incorporate IIA<br />
Standards and MFMA regulations]<br />
Internal Audit Methodology for approval<br />
by Audit Committee.<br />
• Develop Internal Audit plan and<br />
implement.<br />
• Market the Internal Audit Function.<br />
• <strong>Review</strong> the ICT systems.<br />
• Perform ad hoc assignment.<br />
• Develop and review Audit Committee<br />
Charter for Approval by Audit Committee<br />
and Council.<br />
• Planning the Audits<br />
• Executing<br />
• Reporting<br />
• Follow Up<br />
• Planning the audit<br />
• Execute<br />
• Obtain risk register from Risk<br />
Management Unit<br />
• Develop the IA Plan<br />
• Submit to Management for Noting<br />
• Submit to AC for approval<br />
• Submit to Municipal council for Noting<br />
• Receive adhoc assignment from<br />
management<br />
• Send the request to audit committee for<br />
approval<br />
• Conduct the assignment and issue final<br />
Report to Management and Audit<br />
committee<br />
• To review the Internal Audit<br />
Methodology<br />
• Submit to Management for Noting<br />
• Submit to AC for Approval<br />
• Submit to Council for Noting<br />
• Issue Notice and Agenda<br />
• Obtain items from different department
272<br />
and package them<br />
• Issue the Audit Packs<br />
• Attend the meetings<br />
• Procurement of working paper system<br />
• Issue notice<br />
• Prepare the document<br />
• Attend the meetings<br />
4.10.2. Risk Management<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
· To conduct risk assessments<br />
· To safeguard the assets of SDM<br />
through alternative techniques of risk<br />
transfer<br />
· To safeguard SDM assets, its<br />
employees and visitors<br />
· To ascertain the level of integrity of<br />
staff and service providers<br />
· To stem out fraud and corruption<br />
activities<br />
· To secure the sustainability of SDM<br />
· To integrate the Risk Management<br />
function into the Performance<br />
Scorecards of directors<br />
· To conduct strategic, operational,<br />
projects and contracts risk<br />
assessments<br />
· To ascertain the level of risk<br />
exposure of SDM by conducting<br />
physical risk surveys on SDM<br />
properties<br />
· To re-establish the Risk Management<br />
Steering Committee and ensure its<br />
functionality<br />
· Ensure proper storage, management<br />
and maintenance of risk management<br />
data and information<br />
· To raise risk management awareness<br />
amongst SDM staff and councillors<br />
through training<br />
· To stem out fraud and corruption<br />
activities within SDM<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
· By appraising the appropriateness of<br />
insurance contracts, review the<br />
adequacy of cover, and renew policy<br />
· By managing the operations of<br />
security services, review the<br />
allocation of security at operational<br />
sites,<br />
· By performing security vetting on staff<br />
and service providers<br />
· By implementing an anti-corruption<br />
strategy and fraud prevention plan<br />
· By developing business continuity<br />
management plan<br />
· By providing training to staff and<br />
councillors<br />
· By compilation of quarterly risk<br />
management and compliance<br />
reports<br />
· By strengthening the cooperation of<br />
governance<br />
· Arrange workshops and interviews<br />
for senior management as per Risk<br />
Management Framework Guidelines<br />
· Develop departmental risk registers,<br />
composite risk register and SDM risk<br />
matrix<br />
· Coordinate the procurement of an<br />
Integrated Risk and Audit<br />
Management System compatible to<br />
SDM’s IT environment<br />
· To develop a Risk Management<br />
Committee Terms of Reference,<br />
appoint members and chairperson<br />
· Provide risk management training to<br />
staff and councillors<br />
· <strong>Review</strong> and implement the Anti-
273<br />
corruption Strategy and a Fraud<br />
Prevention Plan and establish a<br />
Whistle blowing hotline<br />
· Investigate all allegations of fraud<br />
and corruption in consultation with<br />
other state agencies<br />
· Procure a Risk Management<br />
Information Technology system<br />
4.10.3. Communication, Executive support and Special program<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
To integrate youth in the socio-economic<br />
mainstream<br />
To provide support and advocacy on children<br />
rights and their welfare<br />
Ensure adequate caring and protection of the<br />
elderly<br />
To implement Disabled persons policies and<br />
programme’s<br />
To provide support and advocacy on women<br />
and gender development programmes<br />
To forge strong and sustainable civil society<br />
partnership on constitutional values<br />
To provide partnership and support with<br />
Magoshi<br />
To ensure improved communications with<br />
internal and external stakeholders<br />
To ensure integrated marketing of the district<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Drive youth development through capacity<br />
building and implementation of integrated<br />
youth month program<br />
Facilitate integration and alignment of district<br />
initiatives with NYDA<br />
Ensure provision of comprehensive support<br />
to children centres and their programmes<br />
Develop participatory mechanism on national<br />
and provincial children program<br />
Facilitate participation and integration of<br />
elderly people in society in government<br />
programmes<br />
Facilitate integration of people with disability<br />
in the mainstream society though targeted<br />
programmes<br />
Initiate and implement women focal month<br />
programme<br />
Intensity awareness campaigns on<br />
eradication of gender based violence<br />
Mobilise civil society to adhere and observe<br />
charter of positive values<br />
Strengthen social cohesion through culture,<br />
religion and tradition<br />
Implement uniform integrated support to<br />
traditional leaders<br />
Contribute in liberation struggle heritage<br />
Promote IGR<br />
Provide regular newsletter services<br />
Provide marketing platforms for the district<br />
and its products
274<br />
Provide strategic support to Executive<br />
Mayor, enhance social cohesion and nation<br />
building<br />
To ensure support to mayoral committees<br />
and other civic orientated initiatives<br />
Ensure branding in all activities<br />
Support to community media<br />
Stage high quality events<br />
Establishment of project steering committee<br />
Monitoring and evaluation of implementation<br />
Provide content and administrative support<br />
to mayoral committee<br />
4.10.4. Public Participation<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Enhance public participation<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Host Speakers outreach activities<br />
Publicise scheduled council events<br />
Host annual ward committee conference<br />
Host <strong>District</strong> Public Participation forum meeting<br />
Host Speakers’ forum<br />
Host Chief Whip’s forum<br />
Geographic Names Change<br />
4.10.5. Secretariat<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
To hold executive accountable to Council<br />
To develop and or to review policies<br />
To effectively control internal resources<br />
(Human; Financial; etc.)<br />
To attain Clean Audit by ensuring<br />
compliance to all government and reporting<br />
requirements<br />
To effectively encourage a Risk free working<br />
environment<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Oversight<br />
Policy assessment<br />
Internal control<br />
Operation Clean Audit<br />
Risk Management<br />
4.10.6. Clean Audit<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Contribute to the achievement of clean audit<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Conduct a workshop on code of conduct<br />
Declaration of interest forms submitted by all
275<br />
councillors<br />
4.10.7. Councillor Welfare<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Provision of Councillor welfare service<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Attend to councillor queries<br />
Facilitate workshop on Income Tax<br />
4.10.8. Capacity Building<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
Enhance Council Capacity<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Facilitate training for Section 79 committees<br />
Facilitate horizontal learning<br />
4.10.9. Performance Management System (PMS)<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
To ensure proper implementation,<br />
monitoring, measurement and review of<br />
organizational performance<br />
STRATEGIES<br />
Implement the PMS Framework
276<br />
CHAPTER 5: PROJECTS<br />
PHASE
277<br />
5.1. SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />
SPATIAL RATIONALE WITH OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES AND BUDGET<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
Provision of<br />
municipal<br />
office space<br />
Upgrading of<br />
existing<br />
building Hoep<br />
Hoep Street<br />
Construction of<br />
new offices<br />
Jane Furse<br />
Hoep Hoep<br />
Office space<br />
Construction<br />
of municipal<br />
offices and<br />
township<br />
development<br />
(SR/001/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Targe<br />
t<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives to<br />
facilitate<br />
rezoning<br />
approval<br />
undertaken<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertaken<br />
to facilitate<br />
land<br />
acquisition<br />
for offices<br />
4<br />
initiativ<br />
es<br />
4<br />
initiativ<br />
es<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives to<br />
facilitate<br />
rezoning<br />
approval<br />
undertaken<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertaken<br />
to facilitate<br />
land<br />
acquisition<br />
for offices<br />
4<br />
initiativ<br />
es<br />
4<br />
initiativ<br />
es<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives to<br />
facilitate<br />
rezoning<br />
approval<br />
undertaken<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertaken<br />
to facilitate<br />
land<br />
acquisition<br />
for offices<br />
4<br />
initiati<br />
ves<br />
4<br />
initiati<br />
ves<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>: R169,262<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015: R100,000<br />
2015/2015: 100,000<br />
TOTAL: R369,262<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R500,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R513,594.93<br />
2015/2016:R658,361.58<br />
Total: R1,671,956.51<br />
SDM<br />
SDM<br />
GIS Training<br />
and<br />
Hardware<br />
Training of<br />
municipal<br />
officials on GIS<br />
GIS Training<br />
and<br />
Hardware<br />
(SR/002/201<br />
Number of<br />
staff trained<br />
on GIS<br />
usage<br />
5 staff<br />
trained<br />
on GIS<br />
usage<br />
Number of<br />
staff trained<br />
on GIS<br />
usage<br />
5 staff<br />
trained<br />
on GIS<br />
usage<br />
Number of<br />
staff trained<br />
on GIS<br />
usage<br />
5 staff<br />
traine<br />
d on<br />
GIS<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>: R200,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015: R300,000<br />
2015/2016: R200,000<br />
SDM
278<br />
Undertake<br />
land audit for<br />
municipal<br />
works<br />
Provision of<br />
hardware and<br />
software<br />
related to GIS<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>) usage TOTAL: R700,000<br />
Percentage<br />
GIS<br />
hardware<br />
procured<br />
100%<br />
GIS<br />
hardwa<br />
re<br />
procure<br />
Percentage<br />
GIS<br />
hardware<br />
procured<br />
100%<br />
GIS<br />
hardwa<br />
re<br />
procure<br />
Percentage<br />
GIS<br />
hardware<br />
procured<br />
100%<br />
GIS<br />
hardw<br />
are<br />
procur<br />
Land Audit<br />
for municipal<br />
works<br />
(SR/003/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
of land audit<br />
for<br />
municipal<br />
works<br />
d<br />
100%<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
of land audit<br />
for municipal<br />
works<br />
d<br />
100%<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
of land audit<br />
for<br />
municipal<br />
works<br />
ed<br />
100%<br />
compl<br />
etion<br />
N/A<br />
SDM<br />
To facilitate<br />
implementati<br />
on of De<br />
Hoop<br />
Housing<br />
project<br />
To facilitate<br />
Mampuru<br />
township<br />
development<br />
De Hoop<br />
(SR/004/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Mampuru<br />
(SR/005/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertaken<br />
to facilitate<br />
DeHoop<br />
housing<br />
project<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertaken<br />
to facilitate<br />
mampuru<br />
township<br />
developmen<br />
t<br />
12<br />
initiativ<br />
es<br />
underta<br />
ken<br />
4<br />
initiativ<br />
es<br />
underta<br />
ken<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertaken<br />
to facilitate<br />
DeHoop<br />
housing<br />
project<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertaken<br />
to facilitate<br />
mampuru<br />
township<br />
developmen<br />
t<br />
12<br />
initiativ<br />
es<br />
underta<br />
ken<br />
4<br />
initiativ<br />
es<br />
underta<br />
ken<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertaken<br />
to facilitate<br />
DeHoop<br />
housing<br />
project<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertaken<br />
to facilitate<br />
mampuru<br />
township<br />
developmen<br />
t<br />
12<br />
initiati<br />
ves<br />
undert<br />
aken<br />
4<br />
initiati<br />
ves<br />
undert<br />
aken<br />
N/A<br />
N/A<br />
SDM<br />
SDM
279<br />
5.2. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL TRANSFORMATION<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fund<br />
ing<br />
Sour<br />
ce<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To facilitate<br />
skills<br />
developme<br />
nt initiatives<br />
and create<br />
conducive<br />
environmen<br />
t for<br />
learning<br />
To ensure<br />
sound<br />
knowledge<br />
base and<br />
accountabili<br />
ty<br />
By developing<br />
and submitting<br />
the Workplace<br />
Skills Plan to<br />
LGSeta<br />
By identifying<br />
skills<br />
programmes<br />
and including<br />
them in the<br />
Workplace<br />
Skills Plan<br />
By creating<br />
opportunities<br />
for experiential<br />
learning<br />
By assessing<br />
the impact of<br />
training<br />
interventions<br />
1. Bursarie<br />
s(ODT/0<br />
01/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
2. Experie<br />
ntial<br />
learning<br />
(ODT/00<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
3. Internsh<br />
ips(ODT/<br />
003/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
4. Learner<br />
ship(OD<br />
T/004/20<br />
13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
5. Recogni<br />
tion of<br />
Prior<br />
Learnin<br />
Backlogs<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
1. 0<br />
2. 0<br />
3. 43<br />
4. 55<br />
5. 0<br />
6. 100%<br />
7. 0<br />
8. 0<br />
Baseline<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
1. 76<br />
2. 44<br />
3. 43<br />
4. 46<br />
5. 178<br />
6. 0<br />
7. 0<br />
8. 0<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
1. number 1. 54<br />
of 2. 10<br />
bursaries 3. 30<br />
awarded 4. 100%<br />
2. number 5. 50<br />
of 6. 50<br />
experient 7. 50<br />
ial 8. 100%<br />
learners 9. 100%<br />
accomm 10. 100%<br />
odated<br />
3. Number<br />
of interns<br />
engaged<br />
4. Percenta<br />
ge of<br />
learnersh<br />
ip<br />
programs<br />
impleme<br />
nted<br />
1. number of<br />
bursaries<br />
awarded<br />
2. number of<br />
experienti<br />
al learners<br />
accommo<br />
dated<br />
3. Number of<br />
interns<br />
accommo<br />
dated<br />
4. Number of<br />
learnershi<br />
p identified<br />
and<br />
facilitated<br />
5. Number of<br />
employee<br />
RPL-ED<br />
6. Number of<br />
1. 54<br />
2. 10<br />
3. 30<br />
4. 100%<br />
5. 50<br />
6. 50<br />
7. 50<br />
8. 100%<br />
9. 100%<br />
10.100%<br />
1. number of<br />
bursaries<br />
awarded<br />
2. number of<br />
experiential<br />
learners<br />
accommodat<br />
ed<br />
3. Number of<br />
interns<br />
accommodat<br />
ed<br />
4. Number of<br />
learnership<br />
identified<br />
and<br />
facilitated<br />
5. Number of<br />
employee<br />
RPL-ED<br />
6. Number of<br />
1. 54<br />
2. 10<br />
3. 30<br />
4. 10<br />
0%<br />
5. 50<br />
6. 50<br />
7.50<br />
8.100<br />
%<br />
9.100<br />
%<br />
10.100<br />
%<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R4 000 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15<br />
R7,204,000<br />
2015/16:<br />
R7,589,996<br />
SDM<br />
and<br />
LGS<br />
ETA
280<br />
By rallying<br />
stakeholders<br />
to contribute<br />
towards skills<br />
development<br />
g(ODT/0<br />
05/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
6. Adult<br />
Eduatio<br />
n<br />
Training<br />
(ODT/00<br />
6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
7. Capacit<br />
y<br />
Building<br />
(skills<br />
program<br />
)<br />
(ODT/00<br />
7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
8. Skills<br />
Indaba(<br />
ODT/008<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
9. Workpla<br />
ce Skills<br />
Plan(OD<br />
T/009/20<br />
13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
10. Annual<br />
Training<br />
Report<br />
5. Number<br />
of<br />
employe<br />
ees<br />
subjects<br />
to RPL<br />
6. Number<br />
of<br />
emplyee<br />
s<br />
subjects<br />
to AET<br />
7. Number<br />
of<br />
employe<br />
ees<br />
undergoi<br />
ng skills<br />
program<br />
8.<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
achieve<br />
ment for<br />
undertaki<br />
ng skills<br />
indaba.<br />
9. Perentag<br />
e<br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
WSP.<br />
10. Per<br />
centage<br />
develop<br />
employee<br />
identified<br />
and<br />
registered<br />
number of<br />
employee s<br />
capacitated<br />
7. Implement,<br />
monitor<br />
and review<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Skills Plan.<br />
employee<br />
identified<br />
and<br />
registered<br />
number of<br />
employee s<br />
capacitated<br />
7. Implement,<br />
monitor and<br />
review<br />
<strong>District</strong> Skills<br />
Plan.
281<br />
ment of<br />
Annual<br />
Training<br />
Plan<br />
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY (OHS)<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective<br />
To<br />
promote<br />
employee<br />
health and<br />
wellness<br />
Strategie<br />
s<br />
By<br />
conductin<br />
g regular<br />
safety<br />
inspection<br />
s and<br />
remedyin<br />
g the<br />
hazard<br />
By<br />
conductin<br />
g safety<br />
awarenes<br />
s<br />
campaign<br />
s<br />
By<br />
Project<br />
1. OH<br />
S(O<br />
DT/0<br />
11/2<br />
013-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
2. Empl<br />
oyee<br />
Assist<br />
ance<br />
Progr<br />
am<br />
(EAP)<br />
frame<br />
work<br />
Backlog<br />
s<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
1. 0<br />
2. 0<br />
3. <strong>14</strong><br />
Baselin<br />
e<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
1. 288<br />
2. 66<br />
3. 28<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
1. Percentage<br />
review of OHS<br />
policy,<br />
Percentage<br />
establishment<br />
of safety<br />
committees<br />
2. Percentage<br />
development<br />
of eap<br />
framework<br />
3. Percentage<br />
establishment<br />
of EAP<br />
committees<br />
4. Number of<br />
EAP Training<br />
1. 10<br />
0%<br />
,<br />
10<br />
0%<br />
2. 10<br />
0%<br />
3. 10<br />
0%<br />
4. 2<br />
5. 4<br />
6. 4<br />
an<br />
d 5<br />
1. number of<br />
safety<br />
inspections<br />
and<br />
corrective<br />
measures<br />
2. Number of<br />
safety<br />
awareness<br />
campaigns<br />
3. Number of<br />
awarenessc<br />
ampaigns<br />
conducted<br />
4. Number<br />
of injuries<br />
attended.<br />
1. 08<br />
2. 08<br />
3. 08<br />
4. 5<br />
1. Number of<br />
safety<br />
inspections<br />
and<br />
corrective<br />
measures<br />
2. Number of<br />
safety<br />
awareness<br />
campaigns<br />
3. Number of<br />
wellness<br />
campaigns<br />
conducted<br />
4. Number of<br />
injuries<br />
attended.<br />
1. 08<br />
2. 08<br />
3. 08<br />
4. 4<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> -<br />
R 1 370 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 -<br />
R 1 440 000<br />
2015/2016 –<br />
R 1 510 000<br />
SDM
282<br />
conductin<br />
g regular<br />
wellness<br />
campaign<br />
s<br />
By<br />
managing<br />
injuries in<br />
the<br />
workplace<br />
(ODT<br />
/013/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
3. EAP<br />
comiit<br />
ees<br />
(ODT<br />
/0<strong>14</strong>/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
4. EAP<br />
traini<br />
ng<br />
(ODT<br />
/015/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
5. EAP<br />
quart<br />
erly<br />
report<br />
s<br />
(ODT/016<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
6.Compe<br />
nsation<br />
Occupati<br />
onal<br />
Injuries<br />
and<br />
initiatives<br />
provided<br />
5. Number of<br />
quarterly<br />
reports<br />
6. Number of<br />
awareness<br />
campaigns<br />
conducted<br />
and number of<br />
drills<br />
undertaken
283<br />
Diseases<br />
Act<br />
(COIDA)<br />
((ODT/01<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
6.<br />
LABOUR RELATIONS<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To By<br />
promote maintaining a<br />
sound functional<br />
labour Labour<br />
relations. Relations<br />
Forum<br />
By<br />
conducting<br />
awareness<br />
on labour<br />
relations<br />
1. Local<br />
Labour<br />
Forum<br />
(ODT/017/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
2. Labour<br />
Relations<br />
Bulletins<br />
/publications<br />
(ODT/019/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Backlogs<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
1. 0<br />
2. 0<br />
Baseline<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
1. 31<br />
2. 10<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Targe<br />
t<br />
1. Number 1. 12<br />
1.12<br />
1.12<br />
of Local 2. 4<br />
2. 06<br />
2.06<br />
Labour<br />
Forums’<br />
meetings<br />
2. Number<br />
of<br />
Labour<br />
Relation<br />
s<br />
Bulletins<br />
1. Number<br />
of Local<br />
Labour<br />
Forums’<br />
meeting<br />
s<br />
2. Number<br />
of<br />
Labour<br />
Relation<br />
s<br />
Bulletins<br />
1. Number of<br />
Local<br />
Labour<br />
Forums’<br />
meetings<br />
2. Number of<br />
Labour<br />
Relations<br />
Bulletins<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R50 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R52 550<br />
2015/16 –<br />
R55 125<br />
SDM
284<br />
IGR <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R20,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R21,020<br />
2015/16 –<br />
R22,049.9<br />
8<br />
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT<br />
Object<br />
ive<br />
Strategies<br />
Project<br />
Backlogs<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
Baseline<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
Source<br />
To<br />
provid<br />
e<br />
sound<br />
and<br />
sustain<br />
able<br />
human<br />
resour<br />
ces<br />
By<br />
implementing<br />
HR Plan<br />
By<br />
implementing<br />
employment<br />
equity targets<br />
By reviewing<br />
and<br />
implementing<br />
human<br />
resources<br />
1. HR plan<br />
HR policies<br />
and<br />
procedures<br />
(ODT/021/20<br />
13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
2.Successio<br />
n Plan<br />
(Career<br />
pathing)<br />
(ODT/022/20<br />
13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
1.50%<br />
2.1<br />
3.100%<br />
4.<br />
Accumulativ<br />
e lack of<br />
review<br />
5 .No<br />
backlog<br />
1. 50%<br />
2.30<br />
3.0%<br />
4.<br />
Retentio<br />
n<br />
Strategy<br />
in place.<br />
5. EEP<br />
in place.<br />
1. % HR<br />
plan<br />
develope<br />
d,<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
policies/p<br />
rocedure<br />
s<br />
reviewed/<br />
develope<br />
d<br />
1.100<br />
%, 31<br />
policie<br />
s<br />
review<br />
er/dev<br />
eloped<br />
2.31<br />
3.100<br />
%<br />
4.100<br />
% EE<br />
1.% plan<br />
implemented<br />
2.Number of<br />
policies and<br />
procedures<br />
3.% plan<br />
implemented<br />
4.%<br />
retention<br />
strategy<br />
implemented<br />
5.%<br />
1. 100%<br />
2. 31<br />
3. 100%<br />
4. 100%<br />
5. 100%<br />
1.% plan<br />
implemented<br />
2.Number of<br />
policies and<br />
procedures<br />
3.% plan<br />
developed<br />
4.% retention<br />
strategy<br />
reviewed<br />
5. %<br />
employment<br />
1.100%<br />
2.31<br />
3.100%<br />
4.100%<br />
5.100%<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
R130,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15<br />
R136,000<br />
2015/16<br />
<strong>14</strong>3,324<br />
N/A
285<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
systems<br />
By developing<br />
and<br />
implementing<br />
careerpathing<br />
plans<br />
By reviewing<br />
and<br />
implementing<br />
Retention<br />
strategy<br />
3.Retention<br />
strategy(OD<br />
T/0<strong>23</strong>/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
4.Employme<br />
nt equity<br />
plan (EEP)(<br />
ODT/024/20<br />
13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
5.Recruitme<br />
nt and<br />
selection<br />
(ODT/024/20<br />
13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Relocation<br />
expenses<br />
(ODT/026/20<br />
13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Coordinate<br />
induction<br />
program<br />
2. %<br />
successio<br />
n plan<br />
develope<br />
d<br />
3. Percenta<br />
ge<br />
retention<br />
strategy<br />
reviewed<br />
4. Percenta<br />
ge<br />
employm<br />
ent equity<br />
targets<br />
achieved<br />
5. Percenta<br />
ge<br />
vacancy<br />
rate of<br />
funded<br />
posts<br />
kept<br />
Percentage<br />
payment<br />
facilitated<br />
targets<br />
achiev<br />
ed<br />
5.5%<br />
employment<br />
equity<br />
targets<br />
achieved<br />
equity targets<br />
achieved<br />
100% R250 000
286<br />
INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY<br />
Objectiv<br />
e<br />
To<br />
provide<br />
conduciv<br />
e<br />
environe<br />
nt for ICT<br />
Strategies<br />
By<br />
conducting<br />
needs<br />
analysis<br />
Baseline<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
Project<br />
0% User<br />
requirement<br />
s<br />
analysis(OD<br />
T/027/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Backlog<br />
s<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Indicator<br />
100% % user<br />
requiremen<br />
t analysis<br />
completed<br />
Targe<br />
t<br />
100<br />
%<br />
(dat<br />
a<br />
gath<br />
erin<br />
g<br />
50%<br />
,<br />
draft<br />
repo<br />
rt<br />
25%<br />
,<br />
appr<br />
oval<br />
25%<br />
)<br />
Indicator Target Indicat<br />
or<br />
Target<br />
% user 100% % user<br />
requirement<br />
requirement<br />
analysis report<br />
analysis<br />
completed.<br />
report<br />
completed.<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fund<br />
ing<br />
Sour<br />
ce<br />
100% SDM<br />
By<br />
establishing<br />
sound<br />
regulatory<br />
environment<br />
2 Policy analysis<br />
(ODT/028/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
6 Number of<br />
Policies and<br />
Procedures<br />
reviewed/de<br />
veloped<br />
6 Number of<br />
Policies and<br />
Procedures<br />
reviewed<br />
6 Number of<br />
Policies<br />
and<br />
Procedure<br />
s reviewed<br />
6
287<br />
By ensuring<br />
a stable IT<br />
environment<br />
User support<br />
ICT systems<br />
support<br />
(ODT/029/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
0% % support<br />
provided to<br />
end-users<br />
100<br />
%<br />
% support<br />
provided to<br />
end-users<br />
100% % support<br />
provided to<br />
end-users<br />
100<br />
%<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R2m<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R2,102,000<br />
2015/2016 –<br />
R2,204,998<br />
By ensuring<br />
reliable<br />
wireless<br />
network<br />
100% ICT upgrades<br />
(wireless<br />
network)<br />
(ODT/030/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
0% % wireless<br />
network<br />
available<br />
100<br />
%<br />
% wireless<br />
network<br />
available<br />
100% % wireless<br />
network<br />
available<br />
100<br />
%<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R1,M<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R1,051,000<br />
2015/16 –<br />
R1,102,499<br />
By<br />
maintaining<br />
ICT<br />
infrastructur<br />
e<br />
100% ICT<br />
Maintenance<br />
(ODT/031/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
0% % ICT<br />
infrastructure<br />
maintained<br />
100<br />
%<br />
% ICT<br />
infrastructure<br />
maintained<br />
100% % ICT<br />
infrastructur<br />
e<br />
maintained<br />
100<br />
%<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R700,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R735,700<br />
2015/16 –<br />
R771,749.30
288<br />
By<br />
maintaining<br />
ICT<br />
infrastructur<br />
e<br />
100% Computer<br />
consumables &<br />
accessories<br />
(ODT/032/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
0% % acquisition<br />
of<br />
consumables<br />
and<br />
accessories<br />
requested<br />
100<br />
%<br />
% acquisition<br />
of<br />
consumables<br />
and<br />
accessories<br />
requested<br />
100% %<br />
acquisition<br />
of<br />
consumable<br />
s and<br />
accessories<br />
requested<br />
100<br />
%<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R200,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R210,200<br />
2015/16 –<br />
R220,499.80<br />
By<br />
extending<br />
ICT<br />
Infrastructur<br />
e <strong>District</strong><br />
wide<br />
By<br />
complying<br />
with the<br />
intellectual<br />
property<br />
rights<br />
legislations<br />
All offices<br />
except certain<br />
depots and<br />
regions<br />
connected to<br />
the network<br />
Licences with<br />
ICT service<br />
providers paid<br />
Communication<br />
(landlines,<br />
internet, email<br />
infrastructure<br />
expansion)<br />
(ODT/033/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Software and<br />
ICT Licenses<br />
(ODT/034/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
16 Number of<br />
sites<br />
included in<br />
the network<br />
None<br />
Percentage<br />
software<br />
licenses paid<br />
18 Number of<br />
sites included<br />
in the network<br />
100<br />
%<br />
Percentage<br />
software<br />
licenses paid<br />
18 Number of<br />
sites<br />
included in<br />
the network<br />
100% Percentage<br />
software<br />
licenses<br />
paid<br />
18 <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R4,819,693.9<br />
6<br />
100<br />
%<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R5,065,498.3<br />
5<br />
2015/16 –<br />
R5,313,707.7<br />
7<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R2,3M<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R2,417,300<br />
2015/2016 –<br />
R2,535,747.7<br />
0
289<br />
By<br />
maintaining<br />
ICT<br />
infrastructur<br />
e<br />
100% Computer<br />
equipment &<br />
accessories<br />
(ODT/035/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
0% % acquisition<br />
of equipment<br />
and<br />
accessories<br />
acquired as<br />
and when<br />
requested<br />
100<br />
%<br />
% acquisition<br />
of equipment<br />
and<br />
accessories<br />
acquired as<br />
and when<br />
requested<br />
100% %<br />
acquisition<br />
of<br />
equipment<br />
and<br />
accessories<br />
requested<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R500,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R525,500<br />
2015/16 –<br />
R551,249.5<br />
By<br />
improving<br />
ICT security<br />
5 Security<br />
upgrade server<br />
room<br />
(ODT/036/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
5 Number of<br />
server<br />
rooms<br />
upgraded.<br />
5 Number of<br />
server rooms<br />
upgraded.<br />
5 Number<br />
of server<br />
rooms<br />
upgraded<br />
.<br />
5 <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R200,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R0<br />
2015/16 –R0<br />
By<br />
improving<br />
the quality<br />
of ICT<br />
services<br />
100% Professional<br />
fees<br />
(ODT/037/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
0% %<br />
professional<br />
fees<br />
expended<br />
100% % professional<br />
advice<br />
received<br />
100% %<br />
professional<br />
advice<br />
received<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R900,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R1,996,900<br />
2015/16 –<br />
R2,094,748
290<br />
ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To improve By improving<br />
institutional and<br />
developme implementing<br />
nt and business<br />
productivity processes<br />
By evaluating<br />
the<br />
organisationa<br />
l structure<br />
By<br />
conducting<br />
culture<br />
surveys<br />
By<br />
conducting<br />
job<br />
evaluations<br />
By<br />
implementing<br />
performance<br />
management<br />
framework<br />
1. Procedure<br />
manuals<br />
(ODT/038/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
2. Form<br />
design<br />
(ODT/039/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
3. Organisati<br />
onal<br />
structure<br />
(ODT/040/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
4. Culture<br />
survey.<br />
(ODT/041/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
5. Job<br />
evaluation<br />
(ODT/042/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
6.Performance<br />
management(<br />
ODT/043/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Backlogs<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
1. 20<br />
2. 30<br />
3. 0%<br />
4. 100%<br />
5. 100%<br />
6. 100% for<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />
Baseline<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
1. 80<br />
2. 0<br />
3. 100%<br />
4. 0%<br />
5. 0%<br />
6. 0%<br />
Performance<br />
commitments<br />
signed in<br />
2009/2010<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
1. Number 1. 20 1. % 1. 50 1. % 1. 50%<br />
of 2. 10 manuals % Manuals 2. 10<br />
procedur 3. 100 reviewed. 2. 10 reviewed 3. 100%<br />
e<br />
% 2. Number 3. 100 2. Number 4. 100%<br />
Manuals 4. 100 of forms % of forms 5. 100%<br />
reviewd. % develope 4. 100 develope 6. 100%<br />
2. Number 5. 100 d.<br />
% d<br />
of forms % 3. % 5. 100 3. %<br />
develope 6. 100 structure % structure<br />
d.<br />
% reviewed. 6. 100 reviewer<br />
3. % Org<br />
4. % % 4. % survey<br />
Structure<br />
Survey<br />
conducte<br />
reviewed.<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
4. %<br />
d.<br />
5. 5. % of<br />
culture<br />
5. % of<br />
jobs<br />
Survey<br />
jobs<br />
evaluated<br />
conducte<br />
evaluated<br />
6. percentag<br />
d.<br />
.<br />
eperforma<br />
5. percent<br />
6. percent<br />
nce<br />
age job<br />
age<br />
commitm<br />
evaluatio<br />
performa<br />
ents and<br />
n<br />
nce<br />
agreemen<br />
conducte<br />
commitm<br />
ts signed.<br />
d.<br />
ents<br />
6. Percent<br />
conclude<br />
age<br />
d<br />
performa<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R500 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R525 500<br />
2015/16 –<br />
R551 250<br />
Fund<br />
ing<br />
Sour<br />
ce<br />
SDM
291<br />
nce<br />
commitm<br />
ents<br />
conclude<br />
d<br />
LEGAL SERVICES<br />
Backlog<br />
s<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Baselin<br />
e<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
Source<br />
Objecti<br />
ve<br />
To<br />
provide<br />
effective<br />
and<br />
efficient<br />
legal<br />
services<br />
.<br />
Strategies<br />
By<br />
appointing<br />
a panel of<br />
attorneys.<br />
By<br />
providing<br />
legal<br />
support to<br />
department<br />
s.<br />
By<br />
providing<br />
legislative<br />
updates.<br />
Project<br />
1.Legal<br />
matters<br />
(ODT/044/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
2.Legislati<br />
ve<br />
review<br />
updates<br />
(ODT/045<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
1. 0%<br />
2. 0<br />
1.100%<br />
2.4<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
1. Percen<br />
tage of<br />
court<br />
matters<br />
attende<br />
d.<br />
2. Numbe<br />
r of<br />
legislati<br />
ve<br />
review<br />
update<br />
s<br />
conduc<br />
ted<br />
1. 100<br />
%<br />
2. 4<br />
1.<br />
Percentag<br />
e of court<br />
matters<br />
attended.<br />
2. Number<br />
of<br />
legislative<br />
review<br />
updates.<br />
1. 100%<br />
2. 4<br />
1. perentage of<br />
court matters<br />
attended.<br />
2. Number of<br />
legislative<br />
review<br />
updates.<br />
1. 100%<br />
2. 4<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />
R2 000 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />
R2 102 000<br />
2015/16 –<br />
R2 204 998<br />
SDM
292<br />
AUXILLIARY SERVICES<br />
Backlogs<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
Baseline<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To provide By<br />
sound reviewing<br />
records the file<br />
manageme plan.<br />
nt systems<br />
By<br />
implementi<br />
ng the<br />
Electronic<br />
Document<br />
Manageme<br />
nt System.<br />
By<br />
disposing<br />
of records.<br />
By<br />
archiving<br />
records of<br />
value.<br />
1. File<br />
plan.<br />
(ODT/049/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
2. Electro<br />
nic<br />
docume<br />
nt<br />
manage<br />
ment<br />
3. Record<br />
s<br />
disposa<br />
l<br />
(ODT/047/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
4. Arc<br />
hive<br />
s<br />
1. None<br />
2. 100<br />
%<br />
3. 100<br />
%<br />
4. 420<br />
files<br />
5. 90%<br />
1. File<br />
plan in<br />
place<br />
2. 0%<br />
3. No<br />
dispos<br />
al<br />
conduc<br />
ted.<br />
4. 920Fil<br />
es<br />
5. 10%<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
1. % file<br />
plan<br />
reviewe<br />
d.<br />
2. %<br />
Electro<br />
nic<br />
docum<br />
ents<br />
capture<br />
d.<br />
3. % of<br />
records<br />
dispose<br />
d.<br />
4. % of<br />
files<br />
archive<br />
d.<br />
1. 100%<br />
2. 100%<br />
3. 100%<br />
4. 100%<br />
5. 100%<br />
1.% file plan<br />
reviewed<br />
2.%<br />
Electronic<br />
documents<br />
captured<br />
3.% of<br />
records<br />
disposed<br />
4.% of<br />
records<br />
archived<br />
5.% of<br />
personnel<br />
files audited<br />
and<br />
updated<br />
1. 100<br />
%<br />
2. 100<br />
%<br />
3. 100<br />
%<br />
4. 100<br />
%<br />
5. 100<br />
%<br />
1. % file<br />
plan<br />
reviewed.<br />
2. %<br />
Electronic<br />
document<br />
s<br />
captured.<br />
3. % of<br />
records<br />
disposed.<br />
4. % of<br />
records<br />
archived.<br />
5. % of<br />
personnel<br />
files<br />
audited<br />
and<br />
1. 100%<br />
2. 100%<br />
3. 100%<br />
4. 100%<br />
5. 100%<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
– R41 960<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
– R44 010<br />
2015/2016<br />
– R46 261<br />
SDM
293<br />
To provide<br />
an effective<br />
fleet<br />
manageme<br />
nt system<br />
By auditing<br />
personnel<br />
files.<br />
By<br />
ensuring<br />
proper<br />
lease<br />
contract<br />
manageme<br />
nt<br />
(OD<br />
T/04<br />
8/20<br />
13-<br />
201<br />
4)<br />
5. Person<br />
nel file<br />
audit.<br />
(ODT/0<br />
49/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Fleet<br />
Managemen<br />
t (contract<br />
managemen<br />
t)<br />
(ODT/050/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Fleet<br />
Manageme<br />
nt (lease)<br />
5. % of<br />
person<br />
nel files<br />
audited<br />
0% % lease<br />
contract<br />
managem<br />
ent done<br />
100% % lease<br />
contract<br />
manageme<br />
nt done<br />
updated.<br />
100% % lease<br />
contract<br />
manageme<br />
nt done<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
–R7,442<br />
292.80<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
–R7,821<br />
849.73<br />
2015/2016<br />
–R8,<br />
205,120.37<br />
Fleet<br />
manageme<br />
nt (own<br />
vehicles)<br />
% fleet<br />
register<br />
compiled<br />
and<br />
maintaine<br />
d<br />
100% % fleet<br />
register<br />
compiled<br />
and<br />
maintained<br />
100% % fleet<br />
register<br />
compiled<br />
and<br />
maintained<br />
100%
294<br />
By<br />
managing<br />
trips on<br />
municipal<br />
vehicles<br />
Fuel fleet<br />
(ODT/051/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Fuel fleet 0% %<br />
payment<br />
of fuel<br />
made<br />
Weak fuel<br />
expenses<br />
reconciliati<br />
on (2/12)<br />
Number of<br />
accurate<br />
and<br />
complete<br />
fuel<br />
expenditur<br />
e<br />
reconciliati<br />
ons done<br />
100% % payment<br />
of fuel<br />
made<br />
12 Number of<br />
accurate<br />
and<br />
complete<br />
fuel<br />
expenditure<br />
reconciliatio<br />
ns done<br />
100% % payment<br />
of fuel<br />
made<br />
12 Number of<br />
accurate<br />
and<br />
complete<br />
fuel<br />
expenditure<br />
reconciliatio<br />
ns done<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
–<br />
R3,165,000<br />
12<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
–<br />
R3,326,415<br />
.00<br />
2015/2016<br />
–<br />
R3,489,409<br />
.34<br />
No follow<br />
up on<br />
exceptions<br />
raised<br />
%<br />
exceptions<br />
followed<br />
up<br />
100% %<br />
exceptions<br />
followed up<br />
100% %<br />
exceptions<br />
followed up<br />
100%<br />
By<br />
ensuring<br />
that<br />
vehicles<br />
are in good<br />
running<br />
condition<br />
Repairs and<br />
maintenanc<br />
e (own<br />
vehicles)<br />
(ODT/052/2<br />
Repairs<br />
and<br />
maintenan<br />
ce (own<br />
vehicles)<br />
0% % vehicles<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintaine<br />
d<br />
100% % vehicles<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintained<br />
100% % vehicles<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintained<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
–R2,<br />
750,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
–<br />
R2,890,250<br />
2015/2016
295<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
(No register<br />
of vehicle<br />
service<br />
maintenanc<br />
e)<br />
% of<br />
register of<br />
vehicle<br />
service<br />
maintenan<br />
ce created<br />
100% % of<br />
register of<br />
vehicle<br />
service<br />
maintenanc<br />
e created<br />
100% % of<br />
register of<br />
vehicle<br />
service<br />
maintenanc<br />
e created<br />
100% –<br />
R3,031,872<br />
.25<br />
By<br />
ensuring<br />
that<br />
municipal<br />
vehicles<br />
are<br />
properly<br />
licensed<br />
Licenses<br />
and<br />
subscription<br />
s (vehicles<br />
and satellite<br />
dishes)<br />
(ODT/053/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Licenses<br />
and<br />
subscriptio<br />
ns<br />
(vehicles<br />
and<br />
satellite<br />
dishes)<br />
0% % licences<br />
and<br />
subscriptio<br />
ns paid<br />
100% % licences<br />
and<br />
subscription<br />
s paid<br />
100% % licences<br />
and<br />
subscription<br />
s paid<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
–<br />
R95,348.30<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
–<br />
R100,211.0<br />
7<br />
2015/2016<br />
–<br />
R105,121.4<br />
1<br />
By<br />
ensuring<br />
the safety<br />
of<br />
municipal<br />
vehicles<br />
Tracking<br />
devices<br />
(vehicles)<br />
(ODT/054/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Tracking<br />
devices<br />
(vehicles)<br />
0% % tracking<br />
devices<br />
installed<br />
and<br />
functional<br />
100% % tracking<br />
devices<br />
installed<br />
and<br />
functional<br />
100% % tracking<br />
devices<br />
installed<br />
and<br />
functional<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
–<br />
R156,341.7<br />
9<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
–<br />
R164,3<strong>14</strong>.1<br />
7<br />
2015/2016<br />
–<br />
R172,365.5<br />
6
296<br />
To provide<br />
effective<br />
facilities<br />
manageme<br />
nt system<br />
By<br />
ensuring<br />
that<br />
municipal<br />
properties<br />
are<br />
properly<br />
maintained<br />
Repairs &<br />
Maintenanc<br />
e (Buildings<br />
and<br />
equipments)<br />
(ODT/056/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Repairs &<br />
Maintenan<br />
ce<br />
Buildings &<br />
equipment<br />
s<br />
0% %<br />
buildings<br />
&equipme<br />
nts<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintaine<br />
d<br />
100% % buildings<br />
&equipment<br />
s repaired<br />
and<br />
maintained<br />
100% % buildings<br />
&equipment<br />
s repaired<br />
and<br />
maintained<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
–R300,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
–R315,300<br />
2015/2016<br />
–<br />
R330,749.7<br />
0<br />
By paying<br />
lease and<br />
rental on<br />
time<br />
Lease/rental<br />
(offices)<br />
(ODT/057/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Lease/rent<br />
al (offices)<br />
0 percentag<br />
e lease<br />
and rental<br />
paid<br />
% of<br />
contract<br />
register of<br />
completed<br />
100% percentage<br />
lease and<br />
rental paid<br />
100% % of<br />
contract<br />
register of<br />
completed<br />
100% percentage<br />
lease and<br />
rental paid<br />
100% % of<br />
contract<br />
register of<br />
completed<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
–R4,6M<br />
100%<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
–<br />
R4,834,600<br />
2015/2016<br />
–<br />
R5,071,495<br />
.40<br />
By paying<br />
lease and<br />
rental on<br />
time<br />
Lease/rental<br />
office<br />
machines<br />
(ODT/058/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Lease/rent<br />
al office<br />
machines<br />
0 Percentag<br />
e leases<br />
and rental<br />
paid<br />
100% Percentage<br />
leases and<br />
rental paid<br />
100% Percentage<br />
leases and<br />
rental paid<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
–R3,M<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
–<br />
R3,153,000<br />
2015/2016<br />
–<br />
R3,307,497<br />
Licences &<br />
subscription<br />
Licences &<br />
subscriptio<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
–R95 348
297<br />
s<br />
ns<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
–R52 550<br />
2015/2016<br />
–R55 125<br />
By<br />
ensuring a<br />
habitable<br />
environme<br />
nt<br />
Garden and<br />
cleaning<br />
services<br />
(ODT/059/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Garden<br />
and<br />
cleaning<br />
services<br />
0% Percentag<br />
e<br />
gardening<br />
and<br />
cleaning<br />
services<br />
paid<br />
100% Percentage<br />
gardening<br />
and<br />
cleaning<br />
services<br />
paid<br />
100% Percentage<br />
gardening<br />
and<br />
cleaning<br />
services<br />
paid<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
–R2,4m<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
–<br />
R2,552,400<br />
2015/2016<br />
–<br />
R2,645,997<br />
.06<br />
By<br />
providing<br />
temporary<br />
accommod<br />
ation for<br />
new<br />
appointees<br />
Relocation<br />
expenses<br />
Relocation<br />
expenses<br />
0% %<br />
accommo<br />
dation<br />
provided<br />
to new<br />
appointee<br />
s<br />
100% %<br />
accommoda<br />
tion<br />
provided to<br />
new<br />
appointees<br />
100% %<br />
accommoda<br />
tion<br />
provided to<br />
new<br />
appointees<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
–R250,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
–R262,750<br />
2015/2016<br />
–<br />
R275,624.7<br />
5<br />
To provide<br />
sound<br />
working<br />
environmen<br />
t<br />
By<br />
providing<br />
the<br />
necessary<br />
equipment<br />
s<br />
Office<br />
equipment<br />
(ODT/060/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Office<br />
equipment<br />
Percentag<br />
e office<br />
equipment<br />
s repaired<br />
and<br />
maintaine<br />
d<br />
100% Percentage<br />
office<br />
equipments<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintained<br />
100% Percentage<br />
office<br />
equipments<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintained<br />
100% R220 000<br />
Furniture Furniture Percentag 100% Percentage 100% Percentage 100% R220 000
298<br />
equipment<br />
(ODT/061/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
equipment<br />
e furniture<br />
equipment<br />
s repaired<br />
and<br />
maintaine<br />
d<br />
furniture<br />
equipments<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintained<br />
furniture<br />
equipments<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintained<br />
Contract management<br />
Backlog<br />
s<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Baselin<br />
e<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
Source<br />
Objecti<br />
ve<br />
Strategies<br />
Project<br />
Contract<br />
manage<br />
met<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
monitor<br />
ing of<br />
contrac<br />
ts<br />
100% Percenta<br />
ge<br />
monit<br />
oring<br />
of<br />
contra<br />
cts<br />
100% Percentage<br />
monitoring<br />
of contracts<br />
100%
299<br />
5.3. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT<br />
WATER AND SANITATION<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
To<br />
prov<br />
ide<br />
wat<br />
er to<br />
hou<br />
seh<br />
olds<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Deve<br />
lop,<br />
Impl<br />
eme<br />
nt &<br />
Com<br />
pleti<br />
on of<br />
50%<br />
of<br />
bulk<br />
wate<br />
r<br />
proje<br />
cts.<br />
Project<br />
Mahlakwe<br />
na Village<br />
(Steelpoort<br />
) BWS<br />
(BSD/001/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Mooihoek<br />
Internal<br />
Bulk<br />
(BSD/005/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
husehol<br />
ds<br />
served<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
121 Number of<br />
huseholds served<br />
20% Percentage<br />
completion<br />
121 Number of<br />
huseholds served<br />
20% Percentage<br />
completion<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
121 Yr 1 =<br />
3 100<br />
000<br />
20% Yr 1 =<br />
1<br />
500 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
20<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
20<br />
000<br />
000<br />
Reservoir Percent 5% Percentage 5% Percentage 5% Yr 1 = MI<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
A<br />
CI<br />
P<br />
MI<br />
G
300<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
SB<br />
(Mooihoek)<br />
(BSD/038/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Pipeline<br />
from<br />
Mooihoek<br />
WTW to<br />
Reservoir<br />
SB<br />
(BSD/039/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Bulk<br />
Pipeline to<br />
SB take off<br />
(BSD/040/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Doubling<br />
of<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
Year 1<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
completion completion 240 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
3<br />
760 0<br />
5% design<br />
completed= 20%,<br />
construction<br />
Complete= 80%<br />
5% design= 20%,<br />
construction= 80%<br />
20%-detailed design<br />
approved=20%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
5% design<br />
completed= 20%<br />
construction<br />
Complete= 80%<br />
5% design= 20%<br />
construction= 80%<br />
20%-detailed<br />
design<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
5% design<br />
completed= 20%<br />
construction<br />
Complete= 80%<br />
5% design= 20%<br />
construction= 80%<br />
20%-detailed<br />
design<br />
00<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
990 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
8<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
13<br />
010<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
500 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
7<br />
500 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
1<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
301<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Mooihoek<br />
WTW<br />
(BSD/007/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Mooihoek<br />
(Manoke &<br />
Dresden<br />
Pipeline)<br />
Bulk<br />
Pipeline to<br />
Lebalelo<br />
Central<br />
(BSD/006/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
%<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Perenta<br />
ge<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Year 1<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
approved=20% approved=20% 050 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
10<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
<strong>23</strong><br />
950<br />
000<br />
10% Complete % completion 50% Complete % completion 100% Complete Yr 1 =<br />
40 00<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
40<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
100<br />
000<br />
000<br />
20%-detailed design<br />
approved=20%<br />
Perentage<br />
completion<br />
20%-detailed<br />
design<br />
approved=20%<br />
Perentage<br />
completion<br />
20%-detailed<br />
design<br />
approved=20%<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
1 080<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
15<br />
000 0<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
R<br />
BI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
302<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
20<strong>14</strong>) 00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
19<br />
920<br />
000<br />
Reservoirs<br />
in Lebalelo<br />
Central<br />
(BSD/008/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Connector<br />
Pipes to<br />
Lebalelo<br />
North<br />
(BSD/009/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
20%-detailed design<br />
approved=20%<br />
20%-detailed design<br />
approved=20%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
20%-detailed<br />
design<br />
approved=20%<br />
20%-detailed<br />
design<br />
approved=20%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
20%-detailed<br />
design<br />
approved=20%<br />
20%-detailed<br />
design<br />
approved=20%<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
900 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
10<br />
810 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
18<br />
290<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
660 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
9<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
12<br />
340<br />
000<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
303<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Olifantspo<br />
ort South<br />
Regional<br />
WS<br />
Scheme<br />
phase 6<br />
(BSD/010/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Nkadimen<br />
g BWS<br />
(BSD/011/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Carbonitite<br />
s to<br />
Zaaiplaas<br />
(BSD/012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Jane Furse<br />
25ml<br />
command<br />
Reservoir(<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househ<br />
olds<br />
served<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
5000 Number of<br />
households<br />
served<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
5000 Number of<br />
households<br />
served<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
Yr 1<br />
= 10<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
30<br />
000<br />
000<br />
5000 Yr 1 =<br />
24<br />
000<br />
000<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Yr 1<br />
= 15<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
27<br />
588 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
3 200<br />
000<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
304<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
ph1C)<br />
(BSD/013/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Connector<br />
Pipes to<br />
Zaaiplaas<br />
Villages<br />
(BSD/0<strong>14</strong>/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Nebo<br />
Plateau<br />
Bulk Water<br />
Supply-<br />
Jane<br />
Furse-<br />
Marulanen<br />
g<br />
(BSD/051/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
5<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
24<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
1 000<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
20<br />
285 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
26<br />
835 0<br />
00<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
R<br />
BI<br />
G
305<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Nebo<br />
Plateau<br />
Bulk Water<br />
Supply-<br />
Jane Furse<br />
to<br />
Lobethal(B<br />
SD/052/20<br />
13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Ga-<br />
Malekana<br />
to Jane<br />
Furse<br />
pipeline<br />
(BSD/053/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Ga-<br />
Malekana<br />
WTW 36ml<br />
(BSD/054/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
20% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
24<br />
715 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
22<br />
210 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
40<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
80<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
180 0<br />
00<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
8<br />
911 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
79<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
R<br />
BI<br />
G<br />
R<br />
BI<br />
G<br />
R<br />
BI<br />
G
306<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
20<strong>14</strong>) 710 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
111<br />
379<br />
000<br />
Groblersda<br />
l/Luckau<br />
Water<br />
Supply(BS<br />
D/015/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Upgrading<br />
of Piet<br />
Gouws<br />
WTW<br />
(BSD/016/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Piet<br />
Gouws<br />
Bulk<br />
supply and<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
12 79<br />
4 561<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
4 500<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
10 09<br />
1 700<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
158 3<br />
00<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
750<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
307<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
storage<br />
(BSD/017/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Ga-<br />
Maphopha<br />
Command<br />
Reservoir<br />
(BSD/018/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Steelpoort<br />
Valley<br />
Connector<br />
Pipeline<br />
(BSD/019/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Mphanama<br />
village<br />
connectors<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
5% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
7 500<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
4<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
10<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
20<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
4<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
<strong>14</strong> 20<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
1<br />
000 0<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
308<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Gabaneng,<br />
Ga-Mmela<br />
(BSD/020/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Moutse<br />
BWS<br />
Phase<br />
(Counter<br />
funding)<br />
(BSD/021/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Moutse<br />
BWS<br />
(Project 7<br />
to 12 & 15)<br />
(BSD/055/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Moutse<br />
Bulk Water<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
ion complete=80% complete=80% complete=80% 00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
5<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
4<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
eion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
N/A<br />
40% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
Percentage<br />
completeion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
N/A<br />
40% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
Percentage<br />
completeion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
N/A Yr 2 =<br />
30<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
30<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
40% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
98 00<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
165<br />
500<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
18<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
R<br />
BI<br />
G<br />
R<br />
BI
309<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Supply<br />
(Project 1<br />
and 2)<br />
(BSD/056/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Moutse<br />
BWS<br />
Phase<br />
3,4,5<br />
(BSD/057/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Moutse<br />
BWS<br />
Project<br />
13&<strong>14</strong><br />
(BSD/058/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Ga<br />
Nkwana<br />
Housing<br />
BWS<br />
(BSD/022/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Perceta<br />
ge<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
50% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
50% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Percetage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
50% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
50% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Percetage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
50% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
50% designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%<br />
100%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
200 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
31<br />
455<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
70<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
71 00<br />
0 000<br />
Y1 =<br />
31 20<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
6 200<br />
000<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
G<br />
R<br />
BI<br />
G<br />
R<br />
BI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
310<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Replacem<br />
ent of<br />
dedicated<br />
line to<br />
Jane Furse<br />
Hospital<br />
(BSD/067/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Refurbish<br />
ment and<br />
Upgrading<br />
of<br />
Hlogotlou<br />
WTW<br />
(BSD/068/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Magnet<br />
Heights to<br />
Schoonoor<br />
d bulk<br />
pipeline &<br />
Schoonoor<br />
d 5ml<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
100%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
100% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
30% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
100%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
100% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
30% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
100%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
100% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
30% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
Yr =<br />
1 500<br />
000<br />
Y r 2 =<br />
500<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
1 500<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
30<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
27<br />
084 0<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
W<br />
S<br />
O<br />
G<br />
W<br />
S<br />
O<br />
G<br />
R<br />
BI<br />
G
311<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Impl<br />
eme<br />
ntati<br />
on of<br />
wate<br />
r<br />
retic<br />
ulati<br />
on<br />
(65%<br />
of<br />
backl<br />
og)<br />
Project<br />
comand<br />
Reservoir<br />
(BSD/059/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Sekwati<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
project<br />
phase 2 &<br />
3<br />
(BSD/0<strong>23</strong>/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Tafelkop<br />
reticulation<br />
(BSD/047/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househ<br />
olds<br />
served<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
2 980 Number of<br />
households<br />
served<br />
30% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
2 980 Number of<br />
households<br />
served<br />
30% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
34<br />
516 0<br />
00<br />
2 980 Yr 1 =<br />
756<br />
000<br />
30% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Yr 1<br />
= 30<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
58<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
58<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
312<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Zaaiplaas<br />
Village<br />
Reticulatio<br />
ns<br />
(BSD/024/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Mooihoek<br />
Reticulatio<br />
n (Ga-<br />
Maroga,<br />
Mapea)<br />
(BSD/025/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househ<br />
olds<br />
served<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
1822 Number of<br />
households<br />
served<br />
20% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
1822 Number of<br />
households<br />
served<br />
20% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
1822 Yr 1 =<br />
18<br />
650<br />
000<br />
20% ( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
2<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
6<br />
500 0<br />
00<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
Connector<br />
Pipes and<br />
reticulation<br />
to Lebalelo<br />
South<br />
Villages(Dr<br />
iekop, Ga-<br />
Riba,<br />
Rivercross,<br />
percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
20%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
percentage<br />
completion<br />
20%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
percentage<br />
completion<br />
20%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
5<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
15 00<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
26 00<br />
MI<br />
G
313<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Ga-<br />
Maeseng,<br />
Mandela<br />
and<br />
France)<br />
(BSD/026/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Ga-<br />
Maphopha,<br />
Ga-<br />
Malekana,<br />
Ga-Masha,<br />
Mapea<br />
Connector<br />
Pipes and<br />
Reticulatio<br />
n<br />
(BSD/027/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Ga-Moloi<br />
Water<br />
Reticulatio<br />
n(BSD/028<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
percent<br />
agecom<br />
pletion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
50%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
50% %( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
percentagecompl<br />
etion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
50%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
50% %( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
percentagecompl<br />
etion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
50%( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
50% %( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
4<br />
900 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
9<br />
600 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 1<br />
=<br />
2 593<br />
739<br />
Yr 2<br />
=<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
3<strong>14</strong><br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Solovo<br />
Water<br />
reticulation<br />
(BDS/029/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Lebalelo<br />
North<br />
Water<br />
Reticulatio<br />
n<br />
(BSD/030/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Ga<br />
Nkwana<br />
Housing<br />
Reticulatio<br />
n<br />
(BSD/031/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
hiuseho<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
N/A<br />
5% %( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
2000 Number of<br />
hiuseholds served<br />
N/A<br />
5% %( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
2000 Number of<br />
hiuseholds served<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
4 797<br />
300<br />
N/A Yr 1=<br />
200<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
1 600<br />
000<br />
5% %( designs<br />
approved = 20%<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
600 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
8<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
11<br />
400 0<br />
00<br />
2000 Yr 1 =<br />
2 387<br />
000<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
315<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Taung<br />
Reticulatio<br />
n<br />
(BSD/032/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Praktiseer<br />
Water<br />
Supply<br />
(BSD/033/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Mabotsha<br />
Water<br />
Supply<br />
(BSD/034/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Communit<br />
y Water<br />
Supply for<br />
Mabopane<br />
&<br />
Moraleng<br />
(BSD/066/<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
hiuseho<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househ<br />
oleds<br />
served<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househ<br />
old<br />
served<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
800 Number of<br />
hiuseholds served<br />
4000 Number of<br />
householeds<br />
served<br />
800 Number of<br />
household served<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%<br />
construction<br />
complet=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
800 Number of<br />
hiuseholds served<br />
4000 Number of<br />
householeds<br />
served<br />
800 Number of<br />
household served<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%<br />
construction<br />
complet=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
800 Yr 1 =<br />
<strong>23</strong> 08<br />
0 000<br />
4000 Yr 1 =<br />
21 72<br />
0 000<br />
800 Yr 1 =<br />
7 175<br />
000<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%<br />
construction<br />
complet=80%)<br />
Yr =<br />
1 000<br />
000<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
W<br />
S<br />
O<br />
G
316<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Hotspots<br />
Project(BS<br />
D/060/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Hotspots<br />
Project<br />
(BSD/061/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Makhuduth<br />
amaga<br />
Hotspots<br />
Project<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
Yr 1=<br />
2 891<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
11 56<br />
8 000<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
455 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 1=<br />
9 278<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
28 13<br />
5 000<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
46<br />
891 0<br />
00<br />
Yr=<br />
3 626<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
M<br />
WI<br />
G<br />
M<br />
WI<br />
G<br />
M<br />
WI<br />
G
317<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
(BSD/062/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
505 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
18<br />
132 0<br />
00<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
Fetakgomo<br />
Hotspots<br />
Project<br />
(BSD/063/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Hotspots<br />
Project<br />
(BSD/064/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
100% (Designs<br />
Approved =20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete= 80%)<br />
Yr 1=<br />
376<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
1<br />
503 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
1<br />
879 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 1=<br />
13 02<br />
9 000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
30<br />
807 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
M<br />
WI<br />
G<br />
M<br />
WI<br />
G
318<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Oper<br />
ate<br />
and<br />
main<br />
tain<br />
wate<br />
r<br />
supp<br />
ly<br />
infra<br />
struc<br />
ture<br />
Project<br />
Repairs<br />
and<br />
maintenan<br />
ce<br />
(Water)(BS<br />
D/073/201<br />
3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Electricity<br />
Purchases<br />
(BSD/074/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Water<br />
Purchases<br />
(BSD/075/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
register<br />
ed<br />
incidenc<br />
es<br />
resolve<br />
d within<br />
<strong>14</strong> days<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
100% Percentage<br />
registered<br />
incidences<br />
resolved within <strong>14</strong><br />
days<br />
100% Percentage<br />
registered<br />
incidences<br />
resolved within <strong>14</strong><br />
days<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
69<br />
<strong>14</strong>5<br />
000<br />
100% Yr 1 =<br />
13 00<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
13 36<br />
7 000<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
13 74<br />
2 483<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
21 00<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 2=<br />
22<br />
071 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
<strong>23</strong> 15<br />
2 479<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
52 00<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M
319<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Impl<br />
eme<br />
Project<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
) 54 65<br />
2 000<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
57 32<br />
9 948<br />
Fuel and<br />
Lubricant<br />
Purchases<br />
(BSD/076/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Agency<br />
Services -<br />
Water<br />
(Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
)<br />
(BSD/077/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Moteti B<br />
(Zoetmelsf<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complai<br />
nce with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
agreem<br />
ent.<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
100% Compliance<br />
with SLA<br />
Percentage<br />
complaince with<br />
service level<br />
agreement.<br />
250 Number of<br />
Households<br />
100% Compliance<br />
with SLA<br />
Percentage<br />
complaince with<br />
service level<br />
agreement.<br />
250 Number of<br />
Households<br />
100% Compliance<br />
with SLA<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
3 000<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
3<br />
153 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
3 307<br />
497<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
400 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
420 4<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
440<br />
999<br />
250 Yr 1 =<br />
10<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M<br />
MI<br />
G
320<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
nt a<br />
Wate<br />
r<br />
Cons<br />
ervat<br />
ion<br />
and<br />
Wate<br />
r<br />
Dem<br />
and<br />
Man<br />
age<br />
ment<br />
Strat<br />
egy<br />
(Red<br />
uce<br />
nonr<br />
even<br />
ue<br />
wate<br />
r to<br />
40%)<br />
Project<br />
ontein)<br />
water Ret<br />
& Cost<br />
Recovery<br />
(BSD/035/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Jane Furse<br />
Water<br />
Demand<br />
manageme<br />
nt (<br />
BSD/036/2<br />
013/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Cost<br />
Recovery<br />
in<br />
Monsterlou<br />
s,<br />
Motetema<br />
and<br />
Tafelkop<br />
(BSD/037/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Househ<br />
olds<br />
Served<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Year 1<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
Served Served 900<br />
000<br />
20% (Design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete=80%)<br />
100% (design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
complete 80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
20% (Design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete=80%)<br />
100% (design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
complete 80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
20% (Design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Complete=80%)<br />
100% (design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
complete 80%)<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
1<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
7<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
450 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
10<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
4 500<br />
000<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
321<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Perc<br />
enta<br />
ge<br />
com<br />
pleti<br />
on<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Eradi<br />
catio<br />
n of<br />
supp<br />
ly<br />
throu<br />
gh<br />
wate<br />
r<br />
tank<br />
ers<br />
50%`<br />
Com<br />
pleti<br />
on of<br />
bulk<br />
Sanit<br />
ation<br />
Proje<br />
Project<br />
Flag<br />
Boshielo<br />
WCDM<br />
(BSD/002/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Reduction<br />
of<br />
backlogs<br />
Tankering<br />
(BSD/078/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Burgersfort<br />
WWTW<br />
7MI (New<br />
plant)<br />
(BSD/041/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
%<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
No of<br />
househ<br />
olds<br />
served<br />
through<br />
water<br />
tankers<br />
at least<br />
3 times<br />
a week<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
100% (design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
complete 80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
100% (design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
complete 80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
100% (design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
complete 80%)<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
3 500<br />
000<br />
5% % completion 60% % completion 100% See<br />
above<br />
1 000 No of households<br />
served through<br />
water tankers at<br />
least 3 times a<br />
week<br />
5% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
1 000 No of households<br />
served through<br />
water tankers at<br />
least 3 times a<br />
week<br />
5% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
Completion<br />
1 000 Yr 1 =<br />
1 000<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
2 102<br />
000<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
2 204<br />
998<br />
5% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
24 50<br />
0 700<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
60 00<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
A<br />
CI<br />
P<br />
N/<br />
A<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M<br />
MI<br />
G
322<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
cts 60<br />
000<br />
000<br />
Burgersfort<br />
WWTW<br />
7MI<br />
(Upgrading<br />
)<br />
(BSD/003/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Burgersfort<br />
WWTW<br />
7MI<br />
(Refurbish<br />
ment)<br />
(BSD/042/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Roosenkal<br />
WWWTW<br />
Upgrade<br />
(BSD/043/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=2%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20,%<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
Apel percent 20% (designs percentage 20% (designs percentage 20% (designs Yr 1 = MI<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
5 000<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
17 00<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
1 600<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
5 868<br />
000<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
A<br />
CI<br />
P<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G
3<strong>23</strong><br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Refu<br />
rbish<br />
ment<br />
of<br />
Bulk<br />
Sanit<br />
ation<br />
Facili<br />
ties<br />
Project<br />
Sewer<br />
WWTW<br />
(BSD/044/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Marble<br />
Hall<br />
WWTW –<br />
Effluent<br />
Line<br />
(BSD/004/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Refurbish<br />
ment of<br />
Dennilton<br />
Pump<br />
Station<br />
(BSD/069/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
percentage<br />
completion<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
percentage<br />
completion<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
5<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
22 00<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
6 500<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
6 000<br />
000<br />
Refurbish Percent 100% (designs Percentage 100% (designs Percentage 100% (designs Yr 1 = W<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
2 200<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
1 200<br />
000<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
G<br />
A<br />
CI<br />
P<br />
W<br />
S<br />
O<br />
G
324<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
ment of<br />
Motetema<br />
Sewer<br />
Pump<br />
stations<br />
and<br />
Network<br />
(BSD/070/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Refurbish<br />
ment of<br />
Elandskraa<br />
l Sewage<br />
Ponds<br />
(BSD/071/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Penge<br />
Upgrading<br />
of WWTW<br />
& WTW<br />
(BSD/072/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
Percentage<br />
completion<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
100% (designs<br />
approved=20%,<br />
Construction<br />
Approved=80%)<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
1 300<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
3<br />
500 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
5<br />
437 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
4 563<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
4<br />
000 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
9<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
S<br />
O<br />
G<br />
W<br />
S<br />
O<br />
G<br />
W<br />
S<br />
O<br />
G
325<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Provi<br />
sion<br />
of<br />
hous<br />
ehol<br />
d<br />
sanit<br />
ation<br />
facilit<br />
ies<br />
(60%<br />
of<br />
backl<br />
og)<br />
Project<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
20<strong>14</strong>) 000 0<br />
00<br />
VIP<br />
Backlog<br />
Sewerage<br />
services –<br />
Repairs<br />
and<br />
Maintenan<br />
ce<br />
(BSD/079/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
%<br />
complet<br />
ion<br />
%<br />
register<br />
ed<br />
incidenc<br />
es<br />
resolve<br />
d within<br />
<strong>14</strong> days<br />
95% % completion 95% % completion 95% Yr 1 =<br />
<strong>14</strong>7 7<br />
13<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
3 000<br />
000<br />
100% % registered<br />
incidences<br />
resolved within <strong>14</strong><br />
days<br />
100% % registered<br />
incidences<br />
resolved within <strong>14</strong><br />
days<br />
100% Yr 1 =<br />
654 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
687<br />
354<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
721<br />
034<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M
326<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Project<br />
Sewerage<br />
Services -<br />
Sucking for<br />
VIP Toilets<br />
(BSD/080/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Agency<br />
Services –<br />
Sanitation<br />
(Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
)<br />
(BSD/081/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Agency<br />
Services –<br />
Sanitation<br />
(Ephraim<br />
Mogale)<br />
(BSD/082/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
toilets<br />
sucked<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complia<br />
nce with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
agreem<br />
ent<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
1000 Number of toilets<br />
sucked<br />
100% compliance<br />
with SLA<br />
Percentage<br />
compliance with<br />
service level<br />
agreement<br />
1000 Number of toilets<br />
sucked<br />
100% compliance<br />
with SLA<br />
Percentage<br />
compliance with<br />
service level<br />
agreement<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
1000 Yr 1 =<br />
4 000<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
4 500<br />
000<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
5 000<br />
100% compliance<br />
with SLA<br />
000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
<strong>14</strong>0 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
<strong>14</strong>7 1<br />
40<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
154<br />
350<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
90 00<br />
0<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
94 41<br />
0<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
99<br />
036<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M
327<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
To<br />
mai<br />
ntai<br />
n<br />
acc<br />
urat<br />
e<br />
wat<br />
er<br />
qual<br />
ity<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Impr<br />
oved<br />
Blue<br />
and<br />
Gree<br />
n<br />
Drop<br />
ratin<br />
g<br />
Project<br />
Apel<br />
Sanitation<br />
(BSD/046/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Tafelkop<br />
reticulation<br />
(BSD/047/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Laboratori<br />
es and<br />
Chemicals<br />
(BSD/083/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househ<br />
olds<br />
served<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
eion<br />
Percent<br />
age of<br />
availabil<br />
ity of<br />
chemic<br />
als<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
900 Number of<br />
households<br />
served<br />
30% (design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
100% (availability of<br />
chemicals)<br />
Percentage<br />
completeion<br />
Percentage of<br />
availability of<br />
chemicals<br />
900 Number of<br />
households<br />
served<br />
30% (design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
100% (availability of<br />
chemicals)<br />
Percentage<br />
completeion<br />
Percentage of<br />
availability of<br />
chemicals<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
900 Yr 1=<br />
1 654<br />
700<br />
30% (design<br />
approved=20%,<br />
construction<br />
complete=80%)<br />
100% (availability of<br />
chemicals)<br />
Yr 1=<br />
30 00<br />
0 000<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
5<br />
300 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
6<br />
306 0<br />
00<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
6 6<strong>14</strong><br />
994<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
MI<br />
G<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M<br />
To<br />
ens<br />
ure<br />
prud<br />
Profession<br />
al Fees<br />
(BSD/084/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complia<br />
nce with<br />
100% Percentage<br />
compliance with<br />
service level<br />
agreements<br />
100% Percentage<br />
compliance with<br />
service level<br />
agreements<br />
100% Yr 1 =<br />
2 000<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M
328<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
ent<br />
fina<br />
ncial<br />
man<br />
age<br />
men<br />
t<br />
To<br />
prov<br />
ide<br />
data<br />
on<br />
road<br />
net<br />
wor<br />
ks<br />
Coo<br />
rdin<br />
atio<br />
n of<br />
Infra<br />
stru<br />
ctur<br />
e<br />
with<br />
relat<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
Impl<br />
eme<br />
ntati<br />
on of<br />
RRA<br />
MS<br />
Prog<br />
ram<br />
me<br />
Facili<br />
tate<br />
for<br />
com<br />
mon<br />
obje<br />
ctive<br />
achi<br />
eve<br />
ment<br />
Project<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
) service<br />
level<br />
agreem<br />
ents<br />
Implement<br />
ation of<br />
RRAMS<br />
Programm<br />
e<br />
(BSD/065/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
IGR<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
complet<br />
ion of<br />
activitie<br />
s in the<br />
annual<br />
implem<br />
entation<br />
plan<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
meeting<br />
s held<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
100% (progress as<br />
per annual business<br />
plan)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion of<br />
activities in the<br />
annual<br />
implementation<br />
plan<br />
8 Number of<br />
meetings held<br />
100% (progress as<br />
per annual business<br />
plan)<br />
Percentage<br />
completion of<br />
activities in the<br />
annual<br />
implementation<br />
plan<br />
8 Number of<br />
meetings held<br />
100% (progress as<br />
per annual business<br />
plan)<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
2 102<br />
000<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
2 204<br />
998<br />
Yr 1 =<br />
1 781<br />
000<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
2 063<br />
000<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
2 113<br />
000<br />
8 Yr 1 =<br />
10 00<br />
0<br />
Yr 2 =<br />
10 51<br />
0<br />
Yr 3 =<br />
11<br />
025<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
RT<br />
SI<br />
G<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M
329<br />
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />
Obj<br />
ecti<br />
ve<br />
ed<br />
sect<br />
ors<br />
To<br />
enh<br />
anc<br />
e<br />
own<br />
ersh<br />
ip of<br />
local<br />
facili<br />
ties<br />
To<br />
enh<br />
anc<br />
e<br />
forw<br />
ard<br />
plan<br />
ning<br />
Strat<br />
egie<br />
s<br />
s<br />
By<br />
enha<br />
ncin<br />
g<br />
awar<br />
enes<br />
s for<br />
core<br />
com<br />
pete<br />
ncies<br />
Project<br />
Transfer of<br />
taxi ranks<br />
to locals<br />
(BSD/085/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
planning(B<br />
SD/086/20<br />
13/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicat<br />
or<br />
Number<br />
of taxi<br />
ranks<br />
tranfere<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
approve<br />
d plans<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
6 Number of taxi<br />
ranks tranfered<br />
5 Number of<br />
approved plans<br />
6 Number of taxi<br />
ranks tranfered<br />
5 Number of<br />
approved plans<br />
MTER<br />
F<br />
Budg<br />
et<br />
Estim<br />
ate<br />
6 Yr<br />
1=R70<br />
0 000<br />
5 R1 91<br />
1 000<br />
Fu<br />
nd<br />
in<br />
g<br />
So<br />
ur<br />
ce<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M<br />
S<br />
D<br />
M
330<br />
COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
To<br />
promote<br />
sustainabl<br />
e EMS<br />
services<br />
Compile list<br />
of<br />
equipment<br />
to be<br />
serviced<br />
and<br />
maintained.<br />
Repair of<br />
equipment<br />
as and<br />
when<br />
needed<br />
EMS<br />
maintenan<br />
ce<br />
equipment<br />
(BSD/087/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
% repair, 100% % repair, 100% % repair, 100% repair,<br />
service and repair, service and repair, service and service and<br />
maintenanc service and maintenanc service and maintenanc maintenance<br />
e of EMS maintenance e<br />
maintenanc e<br />
equipments of EMS<br />
e<br />
equipments<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R 250,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R 262,750<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R 275,624<br />
SDM<br />
Appointmen<br />
t of term<br />
contractors<br />
for<br />
servicing,
331<br />
maintenanc<br />
e and<br />
repairs<br />
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objectiv<br />
e<br />
To<br />
promote<br />
sustaina<br />
ble EMS<br />
services<br />
Strategies<br />
Compile<br />
specificatio<br />
ns for<br />
tender<br />
Submit to<br />
specificatio<br />
n committee<br />
Advertise<br />
tender and<br />
tender<br />
processes<br />
Monitor<br />
project plan<br />
Project<br />
Veld Fire<br />
Appliances –<br />
x1 4x4 van<br />
2 x sedan<br />
service<br />
vehicles.<br />
Replacement<br />
of Major<br />
Pumper fire<br />
engine<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
1 Veld Fire<br />
Appliances,<br />
sedans<br />
1 Veld Fire<br />
Appliances,<br />
2X sedans<br />
purchased<br />
1X 4X4<br />
1 Veld<br />
Fire<br />
Appliance<br />
s,<br />
sedans<br />
Major<br />
Pumper<br />
1 Veld Fire<br />
Appliances,<br />
2 sedans<br />
purchased<br />
1 Major<br />
Pumper<br />
purchased<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R0<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R1,100,305<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R1,359,320<br />
SDM
332<br />
and delivery<br />
Hazmat<br />
Trailer<br />
delivered<br />
and<br />
operational<br />
Hazmat<br />
Trailer<br />
delivered<br />
and<br />
operational<br />
.<br />
EMS<br />
equipments<br />
Water<br />
rescue<br />
equipment<br />
delivered<br />
and<br />
operational.<br />
water<br />
rescue<br />
equipment<br />
purchased,<br />
delivered<br />
and<br />
operational<br />
R100 000
333<br />
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To<br />
promote<br />
sustainabl<br />
e EMS<br />
services<br />
Compile list<br />
of foam and<br />
decontamin<br />
ation<br />
detergent<br />
types and<br />
quantities<br />
per station<br />
Submit to<br />
specificatio<br />
ns<br />
committee<br />
Request for<br />
quotations<br />
and<br />
procuremen<br />
t processes<br />
Delivery<br />
and<br />
fire<br />
fighting<br />
foam and<br />
decontami<br />
nation<br />
detergents<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
% supply and<br />
delivery of<br />
foam and<br />
decontaminat<br />
ion<br />
detergents<br />
100%<br />
supplied.<br />
% supply<br />
and delivery<br />
of foam and<br />
decontamin<br />
ation<br />
detergents<br />
100%<br />
supplied.<br />
% supply<br />
and delivery<br />
of foam and<br />
decontamin<br />
ation<br />
detergents<br />
100%<br />
supplied.<br />
SDM
334<br />
distribution<br />
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To Develop list<br />
promote of protective<br />
sustainabl and station<br />
e EMS uniform<br />
services needed<br />
Submit to<br />
specifications<br />
committee<br />
Station<br />
uniform and<br />
protective<br />
clothing<br />
(BSD/088/2<br />
013/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Percentage<br />
purchase of<br />
station<br />
uniform and<br />
protective<br />
clothing<br />
100%<br />
purchase of<br />
station<br />
uniform and<br />
protective<br />
clothing<br />
Supply of<br />
station<br />
uniform for<br />
new<br />
appointmen<br />
t and<br />
volunteers<br />
100%<br />
Supplied of<br />
station<br />
uniform for<br />
new<br />
appointmen<br />
t and<br />
volunteers<br />
Supply of<br />
protective<br />
clothing and<br />
equipment<br />
100%<br />
supplied of<br />
protective<br />
clothing and<br />
equipment<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R800 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R 840 800<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R 881 999<br />
SDM<br />
Advertise<br />
tender and<br />
tender<br />
processes<br />
Delivery and<br />
distribution
335<br />
Disaster Management Services<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fun<br />
ding<br />
Sour<br />
ce<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To<br />
promote<br />
sustainabl<br />
e EMS<br />
services<br />
Appoint<br />
term<br />
contractors<br />
for supply<br />
of food and<br />
food<br />
parcels,<br />
first day of<br />
disaster<br />
happening<br />
Disaster<br />
Relief<br />
material<br />
(BSD/089/20<br />
13/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Percentage 100% Percentage 100% Percentage 100%<br />
purchase of supply of purchase of supply of purchase of supply of<br />
disaster disaster disaster disaster disaster disaster<br />
relief relief relief relief relief relief<br />
material as material as material as material as material as material as<br />
and when and when and when and when and when and when<br />
required required required required required required<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R480,00<br />
0<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R504,48<br />
0<br />
2015/2016:R529,19<br />
9<br />
SDM<br />
Provide<br />
relief<br />
material as<br />
and when<br />
needed<br />
Advertise<br />
tender and<br />
tender<br />
processes<br />
Distribution
336<br />
as needed<br />
DISASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To Compile<br />
promote specifications<br />
sustainable mitigating the x6 4x4<br />
EMS severity of bakkies<br />
services disasters,<br />
emergency<br />
preparedness,<br />
rapid and<br />
effective<br />
response to<br />
disasters and<br />
post disaster<br />
recovery for<br />
tender<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
6 Disaster<br />
Management<br />
bakkies<br />
6 bakkies<br />
purchased<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R0<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R0<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R 0<br />
SDM
337<br />
DISASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To promote<br />
professional<br />
developmen<br />
t<br />
Develop a<br />
list of<br />
employees<br />
that are<br />
registered<br />
with<br />
professional<br />
bodies<br />
Submit<br />
request<br />
To pay<br />
annual fees<br />
Generate<br />
an internal<br />
memorandu<br />
m to finance<br />
Membershi<br />
p fees<br />
(BSD/090/2<br />
013/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Percentage<br />
payment of<br />
registration<br />
or<br />
membershi<br />
p fees<br />
100%<br />
payment of<br />
registration<br />
or<br />
membershi<br />
p fees<br />
Percentage<br />
payment of<br />
registration<br />
or<br />
membershi<br />
p fees<br />
100%<br />
payment of<br />
registration<br />
or<br />
membershi<br />
p fees<br />
Percentage<br />
payment of<br />
registration<br />
or<br />
membershi<br />
p fees<br />
100%<br />
payment of<br />
registration<br />
or<br />
membershi<br />
p fees<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R 50,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R 52,550<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R 55,124<br />
SDM<br />
Proofofpay<br />
ment and<br />
membershi<br />
p
338<br />
DISASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To enhance Develop an<br />
community annual<br />
knowledge program for<br />
base awareness<br />
Do research<br />
on the<br />
vulnerability<br />
of the<br />
<strong>District</strong> to<br />
certain<br />
hazards<br />
Emergenc<br />
y<br />
awarenes<br />
s<br />
campaign<br />
(BSD/091/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Number of<br />
emergenc<br />
y<br />
awarenes<br />
s<br />
campaign<br />
held<br />
20emerge<br />
ncy<br />
awarenes<br />
s<br />
campaign<br />
held<br />
Number of<br />
emergenc<br />
y<br />
awarenes<br />
s<br />
campaign<br />
held<br />
20<br />
emergenc<br />
y<br />
awarenes<br />
s<br />
campaign<br />
held<br />
Number of<br />
emergenc<br />
y<br />
awarenes<br />
s<br />
campaign<br />
held<br />
20<br />
emergenc<br />
y<br />
awarenes<br />
s<br />
campaign<br />
held<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R 50 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R 52 550<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R 55 125<br />
SDM
339<br />
DISASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To Hold<br />
enhance stakeholder<br />
communit meetings<br />
y<br />
knowledge<br />
base<br />
Develop an<br />
Integrated<br />
Arrive Alive<br />
Operational<br />
Plan<br />
Special<br />
Operations<br />
High<br />
Density Day<br />
(Arrive<br />
Alive)(BSD/<br />
092/<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Number of<br />
Special<br />
Operations<br />
High<br />
Density Day<br />
(Arrive<br />
Alive)<br />
undertaken<br />
2 special<br />
operations<br />
high density<br />
Days<br />
undertaken<br />
Number of<br />
Special<br />
Operations<br />
High<br />
Density Day<br />
(Arrive<br />
Alive)<br />
undertaken<br />
2 special<br />
operations<br />
high density<br />
Days<br />
undertaken<br />
Number of<br />
Special<br />
Operations<br />
High<br />
Density Day<br />
(Arrive<br />
Alive)<br />
undertaken<br />
2 special<br />
operations<br />
high density<br />
Days<br />
undertaken<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R 190,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R 199,000<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R 209 475<br />
SDM<br />
Request or<br />
search for<br />
funding<br />
partners<br />
Launch the<br />
Arrive Alive<br />
and<br />
implement<br />
the plan
340<br />
DISASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To Needs<br />
develop analysis<br />
skills<br />
Develop<br />
specifications<br />
EMS<br />
Training<br />
Academy<br />
(BSD/093/2<br />
013/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Percentage<br />
purchase of<br />
EMS<br />
academy<br />
stationery<br />
100%<br />
purchase of<br />
EMS<br />
academy<br />
stationery<br />
Percentage<br />
purchase of<br />
EMS<br />
academy<br />
stationery<br />
100%<br />
purchase of<br />
EMS<br />
academy<br />
stationery<br />
Percentage<br />
purchase of<br />
EMS<br />
academy<br />
stationery<br />
100%<br />
purchase of<br />
EMS<br />
academy<br />
stationery<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R 130 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R 136 630<br />
SDM<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R <strong>14</strong>3 325<br />
MUNICIPAL HEALTH SERVICES (SERVICE DELIVERY)<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To promote Get the Air quality<br />
environmenta existing Management<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
100%<br />
monitorin<br />
# required<br />
capacity<br />
Two<br />
Officers<br />
All Locals<br />
having a<br />
One AQMI<br />
installed in<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
:<br />
SDM
341<br />
l and<br />
personal<br />
health<br />
AQMI into<br />
continuous<br />
and<br />
efficient<br />
functionality<br />
Build<br />
enough<br />
capacity to<br />
carry<br />
Atmospheri<br />
c Emission<br />
Licensing<br />
function<br />
from the<br />
Province<br />
(BSD/094/<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
monitoring<br />
of air<br />
quality<br />
pollutants<br />
g of air<br />
quality<br />
pollutants<br />
workshop<br />
s<br />
attended<br />
capacitate<br />
d in each<br />
local<br />
municipalit<br />
y<br />
monitorin<br />
g<br />
instrumen<br />
t linked to<br />
each<br />
other<br />
each local<br />
municipalit<br />
y<br />
R 1 000<br />
000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
:<br />
R 1 051<br />
000<br />
2015/2016<br />
:<br />
R 1 102<br />
499<br />
Provide<br />
additional<br />
monitoring<br />
equipment’s<br />
to other<br />
locals
342<br />
MUNICIPAL HEALTH SERVICES (SERVICE DELIVERY)<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To Compile MHS<br />
promote strategy and<br />
environme get it approved<br />
ntal and by all council<br />
personal structures<br />
health<br />
Getting<br />
personnel<br />
acclimatised<br />
and putting<br />
systems and<br />
processes in<br />
place for full<br />
implementation<br />
of all nine<br />
programmes<br />
Gazetting of<br />
By-laws<br />
Awareness on<br />
MHS<br />
Programme<br />
(BSD/095/201<br />
3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Percentage<br />
Percentag<br />
Percentage<br />
MHS<br />
e MHS<br />
MHS<br />
awareness<br />
awareness<br />
awareness<br />
program<br />
program<br />
program<br />
conducted<br />
conducted<br />
conducted<br />
100%<br />
MHS<br />
awarene<br />
ss<br />
program<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
100%<br />
MHS<br />
awaren<br />
ess<br />
progra<br />
m<br />
conduc<br />
ted<br />
100% MHS<br />
awareness<br />
program<br />
conducted<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R 80 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R 84 080<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R 88 200<br />
National<br />
Treasury
343<br />
MUNICIPAL HEALTH SERVICES (SERVICE DELIVERY)<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fundi<br />
ng<br />
Sourc<br />
e<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To promote List all the days HIV/AIDS<br />
environmenta that deal with Strategy<br />
l and HIV/Aids<br />
personal<br />
health<br />
Getting personnel<br />
acclimatised and<br />
putting systems<br />
and processes in<br />
place for full<br />
implementation of<br />
all nine<br />
programmes<br />
Placing them in<br />
strategic organic<br />
specialisation for<br />
future personal<br />
development<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Health<br />
Council<br />
(BSD/097/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Number of 4 initiatives Number of 4 initiatives Number of 4 initiatives<br />
initiatives conducted for initiatives conducted for initiatives conducted for<br />
conducted HIV/AIDS conducted for HIV/AIDS conducted HIV/AIDS<br />
for<br />
strategy HIV/AIDS strategy for strategy<br />
HIV/AIDS implementatio strategy implementati HIV/AIDS implementatio<br />
strategy n<br />
implementatio on<br />
strategy n<br />
implementat<br />
n<br />
implement<br />
ion<br />
ation<br />
Percentage<br />
support to<br />
district<br />
health<br />
council<br />
100% support<br />
to district<br />
health council<br />
Percentage<br />
support to<br />
district health<br />
council<br />
100%<br />
support to<br />
district health<br />
council<br />
Percentag<br />
e support<br />
to district<br />
health<br />
council<br />
100% support<br />
to district<br />
health council<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R 500 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/15:<br />
R 525 500<br />
2015/16:<br />
R 551 250<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R20,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R21,020<br />
SDM
344<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R22,049<br />
Talafatsa<br />
Sekhukhu<br />
ne<br />
(Nursery)(<br />
BSD/098/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Percentage<br />
establishme<br />
nt of<br />
nursery<br />
100%<br />
establishment<br />
of nursery<br />
Percentage<br />
establishment<br />
of nursery<br />
100%<br />
establishmen<br />
t of nursery<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
establishm<br />
ent of<br />
nursery<br />
100%<br />
establishment<br />
of nursery<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R100,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R105,100<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R110,249<br />
MHS<br />
equipment<br />
s<br />
(BSD/099/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
)<br />
Percentage<br />
MHS<br />
equipments<br />
purchased<br />
100%<br />
purchased<br />
Percentage<br />
MHS<br />
equipments<br />
purchased<br />
100%<br />
purchased<br />
Percentag<br />
e MHS<br />
equipment<br />
s<br />
purchased<br />
100%<br />
purchased<br />
R50 000
345<br />
Sports, Arts and Culture development<br />
Objective<br />
To<br />
promote<br />
mass<br />
participatio<br />
n in sports,<br />
art and<br />
culture<br />
Strategies<br />
Project<br />
Executive<br />
Mayor’s<br />
marathon<br />
(BSD/100/201<br />
13/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 R100 000 SDM<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Number of<br />
Executive<br />
Mayor’s<br />
marathon<br />
1 Number of<br />
Executive<br />
Mayor’s<br />
marathon<br />
1 Number of<br />
Executive<br />
Mayor’s<br />
marathon<br />
1<br />
Executive<br />
Mayors Cup<br />
(BSD/101/201<br />
3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Sports<br />
Academy<br />
(BSD/103/201<br />
3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives to<br />
support<br />
sports, arts<br />
and culture<br />
developmen<br />
t conducted<br />
6 Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
to support<br />
sports,<br />
arts and<br />
culture<br />
developme<br />
nt<br />
conducted<br />
6 Number of<br />
initiatives to<br />
support<br />
sports, arts<br />
and culture<br />
developmen<br />
t conducted<br />
6 R946 912 SDM<br />
Tournament of<br />
old aged<br />
(BSD/104/201<br />
3/20<strong>14</strong>)
346<br />
Support to all<br />
sports codes<br />
(BSD/105/201<br />
3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Heritage,<br />
cultural show<br />
and exhibition<br />
(BSD/106/201<br />
3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Language<br />
Promotion<br />
(BSD/107/201<br />
3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Arts and<br />
Culture<br />
Capacity<br />
Building(BSD/<br />
108/<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4)
347<br />
5.4. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (LED)<br />
LED with objectives, targets and budget<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To conduct seminars<br />
for small businesses<br />
To provide support<br />
to SMMEs and<br />
cooperatives<br />
Conduct<br />
seminars for<br />
small<br />
businesses<br />
on supply<br />
chain<br />
processes<br />
Support<br />
SMME’s and<br />
cooperatives<br />
with<br />
production<br />
inputs<br />
Small<br />
business<br />
seminar<br />
(LED/001/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
SMME and<br />
cooperative<br />
s Support<br />
(LED/002/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
seminars<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
SMME’s/<br />
cooperati<br />
ves<br />
supporte<br />
d with<br />
productio<br />
n inputs<br />
5 Number<br />
of<br />
seminars<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
5 Number<br />
of<br />
SMME’s/<br />
cooperati<br />
ves<br />
supporte<br />
d with<br />
productio<br />
n inputs<br />
5 Number<br />
of<br />
seminars<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
5 Number<br />
of<br />
SMME’s/<br />
cooperati<br />
ves<br />
supporte<br />
d with<br />
productio<br />
n inputs<br />
5 <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R150,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R157,500<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R165,375<br />
TOTAL: R472, 875<br />
5 <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R300,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R315,599.40<br />
2015/2016: 330,750<br />
TOTAL:<br />
R946,349.40
348<br />
To provide platform<br />
for SMMEs<br />
exhibitions<br />
To foster municipal<br />
partnerships<br />
Expose<br />
SMME’s to<br />
market<br />
exhibitions<br />
Municipal<br />
partnerships<br />
Market<br />
exhibitions<br />
(LED/003/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Municipal<br />
partnerships<br />
(LED/004/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
and<br />
equipme<br />
nts<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
SMME’s<br />
exposed<br />
to market<br />
exhibition<br />
s<br />
and<br />
equipme<br />
nts<br />
4 Number<br />
of<br />
SMME’s<br />
exposed<br />
to market<br />
exhibition<br />
s<br />
and<br />
equipme<br />
nts<br />
4 Number<br />
of<br />
SMME’s<br />
exposed<br />
to market<br />
exhibition<br />
s<br />
4 <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> R150,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R157,500<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R165,375<br />
TOTAL: R472,875<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> R0<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015 R210,200<br />
2015/2016<br />
R220,499.80<br />
SDA’s LED projects<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To promote<br />
Development Fresh<br />
sustainable rural of agroprocessing<br />
Produce<br />
economies through<br />
Market.<br />
agricultural and initiatives<br />
agro-processing<br />
Citrus<br />
development<br />
Processing<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
%<br />
impleme<br />
ntation of<br />
fresh<br />
produce<br />
and<br />
40 %<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
fresh<br />
produce<br />
and citrus<br />
%<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
fresh<br />
produce<br />
and citrus<br />
40%<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
fresh<br />
produce<br />
and citrus<br />
%<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
fresh<br />
produce<br />
and citrus<br />
40%<br />
implem<br />
entatio<br />
n of<br />
fresh<br />
produc<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R1 000<br />
000.00<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R700.000<br />
2015/2016:R600.000<br />
SDA.<br />
Private<br />
Fundin<br />
g
349<br />
To ensure small<br />
town and settlement<br />
regeneration<br />
To develop and<br />
market key tourism<br />
clusters<br />
To develop<br />
sustainable mining<br />
communities<br />
Regeneration<br />
of small<br />
towns in<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Tourism<br />
development<br />
and<br />
marketing.<br />
SLP and<br />
Enterprise<br />
Development.<br />
Plant.<br />
Animal<br />
Breeding<br />
Developme<br />
nt<br />
Jane Furse<br />
and<br />
Steelpoort<br />
Regeneratio<br />
n<br />
Potlake and<br />
Flag<br />
Boshielo<br />
Developme<br />
nt<br />
Job<br />
Creation<br />
Reports<br />
Competitive<br />
citrus<br />
plant<br />
# small<br />
towns<br />
regenerat<br />
ion<br />
#<br />
business<br />
plans<br />
develope<br />
d<br />
# public<br />
private<br />
partnersh<br />
ip signing<br />
plant plant. %<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
chicken<br />
abattoir.<br />
Scoping<br />
of two<br />
small<br />
towns for<br />
regenerat<br />
ion.<br />
2<br />
business<br />
plans<br />
5 public<br />
private<br />
partners<br />
to the<br />
Two<br />
more<br />
small<br />
towns<br />
regenerat<br />
ed<br />
Investor<br />
and<br />
funding<br />
attraction<br />
%<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
the<br />
plant.<br />
30%<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
chicken<br />
abattoir.<br />
50%<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
small<br />
town<br />
regenerat<br />
ion.<br />
2 investor<br />
and<br />
funding<br />
attracted<br />
50 %<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
the<br />
plant. %<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
chicken<br />
abattoir.<br />
# small<br />
towns<br />
regenerat<br />
ion.<br />
%<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
tourism<br />
facilities<br />
%<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
the<br />
e and<br />
citrus<br />
plant.<br />
30%<br />
implem<br />
entatio<br />
n of<br />
chicken<br />
abattoir<br />
.<br />
100%<br />
implem<br />
entatio<br />
n of<br />
town<br />
regener<br />
ation.<br />
50%<br />
implem<br />
entatio<br />
n of<br />
tourism<br />
facilitie<br />
s<br />
100 %<br />
implem<br />
entatio<br />
n of the<br />
Total: R<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong>: R1.2m<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R1 200.000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R700.000<br />
2015/2016:R650.000<br />
Total: R<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R800.000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R500.000<br />
2015/2016: R500.000<br />
Total: R<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R800.000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R300.000<br />
SDA,<br />
Private<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
SDA,<br />
Private<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
IDC,<br />
SDA,<br />
Private<br />
Fundin
350<br />
Supplier<br />
Developme<br />
nt Program<br />
(CSDP)<br />
for the<br />
project<br />
project CSDP CSDP CSDP CSDP 2015/2016:R500.000<br />
Total: R<br />
g
351<br />
5.5. FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY WITH OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND BUDGET<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To ensure<br />
sufficient<br />
reserve funds to<br />
address asset<br />
renewal<br />
Maximisation<br />
of own<br />
revenue<br />
towards<br />
Capital<br />
Replacement<br />
Reserves<br />
capital<br />
replaceme<br />
nt reserve<br />
(FV/001/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Percentage<br />
improvement<br />
in capital<br />
Replacement<br />
reserves<br />
8% on<br />
Improveme<br />
nt in Capital<br />
Replaceme<br />
nt Reserves<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
improvem<br />
ent in<br />
capital<br />
Replacem<br />
ent<br />
reserves<br />
10% on<br />
investmen<br />
t in capital<br />
replaceme<br />
nt<br />
reserves<br />
Percentage<br />
improveme<br />
nt in capital<br />
Replaceme<br />
nt reserves<br />
15% on<br />
investmen<br />
t in capital<br />
replaceme<br />
nt<br />
reserves<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R7m<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R20,2m<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R22,8m<br />
SDM<br />
Total:<br />
R60,86m
352<br />
To ensure<br />
preparation and<br />
implementation<br />
of realistic<br />
budget for the<br />
municipality<br />
To ensure<br />
improved Audit<br />
Opinion<br />
Preparation<br />
and<br />
monitoring of<br />
budget<br />
Improved<br />
audit opinion<br />
Budget<br />
preparatio<br />
n<br />
(FV/002/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Improved<br />
Audit<br />
Opinion<br />
(FV/003/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentage<br />
realistic and<br />
credible<br />
budget<br />
prepared<br />
Percentage<br />
improvement<br />
of audit<br />
opinion<br />
100%<br />
realistic and<br />
credible<br />
budget<br />
prepared:<br />
1.Cash<br />
backed<br />
30%<br />
2.Timelines<br />
30%<br />
3.Amendme<br />
nds made<br />
2x40%<br />
100%<br />
improveme<br />
nt of audit<br />
opinion 1.<br />
Addressing<br />
prior year<br />
audit issues<br />
(50%). 2.<br />
Strenghthen<br />
ing internal<br />
controls<br />
(50%)<br />
Percentag<br />
e realistic<br />
and<br />
credible<br />
budget<br />
prepared<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
improvem<br />
ent of<br />
audit<br />
opinion<br />
100%<br />
realistic<br />
and<br />
credible<br />
budget<br />
prepared:<br />
1.Cash<br />
backed<br />
30%<br />
2.Timeline<br />
s 30%<br />
3.Amend<br />
mends<br />
made<br />
2x40%<br />
100%<br />
improvem<br />
ent of<br />
audit<br />
opinion 1.<br />
Addressin<br />
g prior<br />
year audit<br />
issues<br />
(50%). 2.<br />
Strenghth<br />
ening<br />
internal<br />
controls<br />
(50%)<br />
Percentage<br />
realistic and<br />
credible<br />
budget<br />
prepared<br />
Percentage<br />
improveme<br />
nt of audit<br />
opinion<br />
100%<br />
realistic<br />
and<br />
credible<br />
budget<br />
prepared:<br />
1.Cash<br />
backed<br />
30%<br />
2.Timeline<br />
s 30%<br />
3.Amend<br />
mends<br />
made<br />
2x40%<br />
100%<br />
improvem<br />
ent of<br />
audit<br />
opinion 1.<br />
Addressin<br />
g prior<br />
year audit<br />
issues<br />
(50%). 2.<br />
Strenghth<br />
ening<br />
internal<br />
controls<br />
(50%)<br />
N/A<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R331,644<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R<br />
450,000<br />
2015/2016:R<br />
472,050<br />
Total:<br />
R1,253,715<br />
N/A<br />
SDM
353<br />
To ensure that<br />
assets and<br />
inventory are<br />
adequately<br />
accounted for,<br />
properly<br />
recorded and<br />
safe guarded<br />
Recording,<br />
valuation of<br />
municipal<br />
assets and<br />
Unbundling<br />
of<br />
Infrastructura<br />
l projects<br />
Asset<br />
managem<br />
ent<br />
(FV/004/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentage<br />
GRAP<br />
compliant<br />
FAR<br />
100%<br />
GRAP<br />
compliant<br />
FAR(Unbun<br />
dled Assets,<br />
safeguardin<br />
g movable<br />
and<br />
immovable<br />
assets 20%,<br />
disposals<br />
10%,<br />
valuation<br />
30%,<br />
records<br />
keeping<br />
10%)<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
GRAP<br />
compliant<br />
FAR<br />
100%<br />
GRAP<br />
compliant<br />
FAR(Unbu<br />
ndled<br />
Assets,<br />
updated<br />
movable<br />
and<br />
immovabl<br />
e assets<br />
20%,<br />
disposals<br />
10%,<br />
valuation<br />
30%,<br />
records<br />
keeping<br />
10%)<br />
Percentage<br />
GRAP<br />
compliant<br />
FAR<br />
100%<br />
GRAP<br />
compliant<br />
FAR(Unbu<br />
ndled<br />
Assets,<br />
updated<br />
movable<br />
and<br />
immovabl<br />
e assets<br />
20%,<br />
disposals<br />
10%,<br />
valuation<br />
30%,<br />
records<br />
keeping<br />
10%)<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R6,890,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R3M<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R2M<br />
Total:<br />
R11,9M<br />
Recording<br />
and valuing<br />
of all<br />
municipal<br />
inventory<br />
items.<br />
Inventory<br />
Managem<br />
ent<br />
(Stores<br />
and<br />
material)<br />
(FV/005/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentage<br />
of updated<br />
inventory<br />
register<br />
80%<br />
updated<br />
inventory<br />
register(pur<br />
chases<br />
50%,<br />
valuation<br />
20%,<br />
disposals<br />
5%, record<br />
keeping<br />
10%,<br />
Percentag<br />
e of<br />
updated<br />
inventory<br />
register<br />
100%<br />
updated<br />
inventory<br />
register<br />
(purchase<br />
s 50%,<br />
valuation<br />
20%,<br />
disposals<br />
5%,<br />
record<br />
keeping<br />
Percentage<br />
of updated<br />
inventory<br />
register<br />
100%<br />
updated<br />
inventory<br />
register<br />
(purchase<br />
s 50%,<br />
valuation<br />
20%,<br />
disposals<br />
5%,<br />
record<br />
keeping<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R1,3M<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R1,366,300<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R1,433,249<br />
Total:<br />
R4,099,549<br />
None
354<br />
safeguardin<br />
g 15%)<br />
10%,<br />
safeguardi<br />
ng 15%)<br />
10%,<br />
safeguardi<br />
ng 15%)<br />
To ensure<br />
prudent<br />
expenditure<br />
management<br />
To ensure<br />
proper<br />
management of<br />
documents<br />
Process all<br />
invoices<br />
received as<br />
per service<br />
standards<br />
target date<br />
Adhering to<br />
document<br />
management<br />
process flow.<br />
Expenditur<br />
e<br />
Managem<br />
ent<br />
(FV/007/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Document<br />
managem<br />
ent<br />
(FV/006/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentage<br />
of creditors<br />
reconciled<br />
and paid<br />
within 30<br />
days of<br />
invoice date<br />
Percentage<br />
documents<br />
scanned and<br />
filed as per<br />
process plan<br />
100% of<br />
creditors<br />
paid within<br />
30 days of<br />
invoice date<br />
(reconciliati<br />
on 50% and<br />
payments<br />
50%)<br />
100%<br />
documents<br />
scanned<br />
and filed as<br />
per process<br />
plan<br />
(electronic<br />
filing 50%,<br />
manual<br />
filing 50%)<br />
Percentag<br />
e of<br />
creditors<br />
within 30<br />
days of<br />
invoice<br />
date<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
document<br />
s scanned<br />
and filed<br />
as per<br />
process<br />
plan<br />
100% of<br />
creditors<br />
paid within<br />
30 days of<br />
invoice<br />
date<br />
(reconcilia<br />
tion 50%<br />
and<br />
payments<br />
50%)<br />
100%<br />
document<br />
s scanned<br />
and filed<br />
as per<br />
process<br />
plan<br />
(electronic<br />
filing 50%,<br />
manual<br />
filing 50%)<br />
Percentage<br />
of creditors<br />
within 30<br />
days of<br />
invoice date<br />
Percentage<br />
documents<br />
scanned<br />
and filed as<br />
per process<br />
plan<br />
100% of<br />
creditors<br />
paid within<br />
30 days of<br />
invoice<br />
date<br />
(reconcilia<br />
tion 50%<br />
and<br />
payments<br />
50%)<br />
100%<br />
document<br />
s scanned<br />
and filed<br />
as per<br />
process<br />
plan<br />
(electronic<br />
filing 50%,<br />
manual<br />
filing 50%)<br />
N/A<br />
N/A<br />
N/A<br />
N/A
355<br />
To ensure<br />
accurate and<br />
complete<br />
reporting of<br />
financial<br />
information<br />
To ensure<br />
sufficient<br />
revenue to<br />
address<br />
development<br />
imperatives<br />
Reconciliatio<br />
n of payroll<br />
and creditors<br />
accounts<br />
balances<br />
Percentage<br />
revenue<br />
collection<br />
from baseline<br />
Financial<br />
reporting<br />
Revenue<br />
Managem<br />
ent (Cost<br />
recovery)<br />
(FV/008/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
expenditure<br />
reconciliation<br />
s performed<br />
on time<br />
Percentage<br />
of consumer<br />
and indigent<br />
data<br />
collected and<br />
cleansed for<br />
5<br />
areas/village<br />
s<br />
36<br />
expenditure<br />
reconciliatio<br />
ns<br />
performed<br />
on a<br />
monthly<br />
basis<br />
100%<br />
consumer,<br />
indigent<br />
data<br />
collected<br />
and<br />
cleansed for<br />
5<br />
areas/villag<br />
es (<br />
magukubjan<br />
e,<br />
naganeng,<br />
Roosenekal<br />
,<br />
tsimanyane,<br />
mapodile)<br />
Number of<br />
expenditur<br />
e<br />
reconciliati<br />
ons<br />
performed<br />
on time<br />
Percentag<br />
e of data<br />
collected<br />
and<br />
cleansed<br />
for five<br />
areas/villa<br />
ges<br />
36<br />
expenditur<br />
e<br />
reconciliati<br />
ons<br />
performed<br />
on a<br />
monthly<br />
basis<br />
100%<br />
consumer,<br />
indigent<br />
data<br />
collected<br />
and<br />
cleansed<br />
for 5<br />
areas/villa<br />
ges (<br />
magukubj<br />
ane,<br />
naganeng,<br />
Roosenek<br />
al,<br />
tsimanyan<br />
e,<br />
mapodile)<br />
Number of<br />
expenditure<br />
reconciliatio<br />
ns<br />
performed<br />
on time<br />
Percentage<br />
of data<br />
collected<br />
and<br />
cleansed for<br />
five<br />
areas/villag<br />
es<br />
36<br />
expenditur<br />
e<br />
reconciliati<br />
ons<br />
performed<br />
on a<br />
monthly<br />
basis<br />
100%<br />
consumer,<br />
indigent<br />
data<br />
collected<br />
and<br />
cleansed<br />
for 5<br />
areas/villa<br />
ges (<br />
magukubj<br />
ane,<br />
naganeng,<br />
Roosenek<br />
al,<br />
tsimanyan<br />
e,<br />
mapodile)<br />
N/A<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R8 477 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R6m<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R7,5m<br />
Total:<br />
R19,5m<br />
N/A
356<br />
Percentage<br />
revenue<br />
collected<br />
40%<br />
revenue<br />
collected(R<br />
15 076 959)<br />
Percentag<br />
e revenue<br />
collection<br />
attained<br />
60%<br />
revenue<br />
collected<br />
Percentage<br />
revenue<br />
collection<br />
attained<br />
63%<br />
revenue<br />
collected<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R3,209,800<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R3,383,780<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R3,561,355<br />
Total:<br />
R10,154,935<br />
To ensure the<br />
optimum,<br />
efficient,<br />
effective<br />
functional<br />
procurement<br />
processes.<br />
Procurement<br />
of goods and<br />
services on<br />
time<br />
Compliance<br />
to Supply<br />
Chain<br />
Management<br />
policies and<br />
regulations.<br />
Demand<br />
Managem<br />
ent<br />
(FV/010/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Acquisitio<br />
n<br />
Managem<br />
ent<br />
(FV/011/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentage<br />
development<br />
of<br />
procurement<br />
plans<br />
Percentage<br />
reduction of<br />
irregular<br />
expenditure<br />
from baseline<br />
100%<br />
developmen<br />
t of<br />
procuremen<br />
t plans<br />
100%<br />
reduction of<br />
irregular<br />
expenditure<br />
from<br />
baseline<br />
(adherence<br />
to full scm<br />
policies and<br />
regulations<br />
100%)<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
developm<br />
ent of<br />
procureme<br />
nt plans<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
reduction<br />
on<br />
irregular<br />
expenditur<br />
e from<br />
baseline<br />
100%<br />
developm<br />
ent of<br />
procureme<br />
nt plans<br />
100%<br />
reduction<br />
of irregular<br />
expenditur<br />
e from<br />
baseline(a<br />
dherence<br />
to full scm<br />
policies<br />
and<br />
regulation<br />
s 100%)<br />
Percentage<br />
developmen<br />
t of<br />
procuremen<br />
t plans<br />
Percentage<br />
reduction<br />
on irregular<br />
expenditure<br />
from<br />
baseline<br />
100%<br />
developm<br />
ent of<br />
procureme<br />
nt plans<br />
100%<br />
reduction<br />
of irregular<br />
expenditur<br />
e from<br />
baseline(a<br />
dherence<br />
to full scm<br />
policies<br />
and<br />
regulation<br />
s 100%)<br />
N/A<br />
N/A<br />
N/A<br />
N/A
357<br />
To ensure<br />
efficient and<br />
effective<br />
contract<br />
management<br />
To ensure<br />
accountability<br />
Drafting and<br />
management<br />
of service<br />
level<br />
agreements<br />
(SLA) for all<br />
services<br />
rendered to<br />
SDM<br />
Monitoring<br />
Contract<br />
Managem<br />
ent<br />
(FV/012/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Complianc<br />
e<br />
managem<br />
ent<br />
(FV/013/2<br />
013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentage<br />
SLA’s<br />
available and<br />
updated on<br />
the contract<br />
register<br />
Number of<br />
compliance<br />
reports<br />
generated<br />
100%<br />
available<br />
and<br />
updated on<br />
the contract<br />
register<br />
(drafting<br />
and register<br />
updating)<br />
5 reports<br />
(section 71,<br />
section 52,<br />
supply<br />
chain,<br />
CIDB,<br />
section 72,<br />
AFS)<br />
Percentag<br />
e SLA’s<br />
available<br />
and<br />
updated<br />
on the<br />
contract<br />
register<br />
Number of<br />
complianc<br />
e reports<br />
generated<br />
100%<br />
SLA’s<br />
available<br />
and<br />
updated<br />
on the<br />
contract<br />
register<br />
5 reports<br />
(section<br />
71,<br />
section<br />
52, supply<br />
chain,<br />
CIDB,<br />
section<br />
72, AFS)<br />
Percentage<br />
SLA’s<br />
available<br />
and<br />
updated on<br />
the contract<br />
register<br />
Number of<br />
compliance<br />
reports<br />
generated<br />
100%<br />
SLA’s<br />
available<br />
and<br />
updated<br />
on the<br />
contract<br />
register<br />
5 reports<br />
(section<br />
71,<br />
section<br />
52, supply<br />
chain,<br />
CIDB,<br />
section<br />
72, AFS)<br />
N/A<br />
N/A
358<br />
5.6. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
INTERNAL AUDIT WITH OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND BUDGET<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
SDM<br />
Objective<br />
To provide<br />
independent,<br />
objective assurance<br />
and consulting<br />
services<br />
Strategie<br />
s<br />
Planning<br />
the<br />
Audits<br />
Executin<br />
g<br />
Project<br />
Internal<br />
Audits<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
# of<br />
Internal<br />
Audit<br />
Reports<br />
issued<br />
26 # of Internal<br />
Audit<br />
Reports<br />
issued<br />
28 # of Internal<br />
Audit<br />
Reports<br />
issued<br />
30<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:1<br />
000 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:1<br />
051 000<br />
2015/2016:R1<br />
102 499<br />
Reportin<br />
g
359<br />
To assess and<br />
evaluate the<br />
Municipal<br />
performance<br />
information<br />
Follow<br />
Up<br />
Performa<br />
nce<br />
Audits<br />
(GGPP/0<br />
01/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
Performan<br />
ce audit<br />
reports<br />
issued<br />
4 Number of<br />
Performance<br />
audit reports<br />
issued<br />
4 Number of<br />
Performance<br />
audit reports<br />
issued<br />
4<br />
To effectively<br />
control Internal<br />
resources (Human;<br />
Financial; etc.)<br />
Regularit<br />
y audit<br />
(GGPP/0<br />
01/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
regularity<br />
audits<br />
conducted<br />
28 Number of<br />
regularity<br />
audits<br />
conducted<br />
28 Number of<br />
regularity<br />
audits<br />
conducted<br />
28
360<br />
To evaluate and<br />
improve the<br />
effectiveness of ICT<br />
controls<br />
Planning<br />
the<br />
audits<br />
Executio<br />
n<br />
ICT<br />
Audits<br />
(GGPP/0<br />
03/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
ICT audit<br />
reports<br />
issued<br />
4 Number of<br />
ICT audit<br />
reports<br />
issued<br />
4 Number of<br />
ICT audit<br />
reports<br />
issued<br />
4<br />
Reportin<br />
g<br />
Follow<br />
Up<br />
To develop the<br />
three year rolling<br />
Internal Audit Plan<br />
Obtain<br />
risk<br />
register<br />
from Risk<br />
Manage<br />
ment Unit<br />
Develop<br />
the IA<br />
Plan<br />
Submit to<br />
Manage<br />
ment for<br />
Noting<br />
Submit to<br />
AC for<br />
approval<br />
Three<br />
year<br />
rolling<br />
plan<br />
(GGPP/0<br />
04/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentag<br />
e review<br />
of the 3<br />
year and<br />
annual IA<br />
plan<br />
100% Percentage<br />
review of<br />
the 3 year<br />
and annual<br />
IA plan<br />
100% Percentage<br />
review of<br />
the 3 year<br />
and annual<br />
IA plan<br />
100%
361<br />
To perform ad hoc<br />
assignments as<br />
requested by<br />
council and<br />
management<br />
Submit to<br />
Municipal<br />
council<br />
for<br />
Noting<br />
Receive<br />
adhoc<br />
assignme<br />
nt from<br />
manage<br />
ment<br />
Send the<br />
request<br />
to audit<br />
committe<br />
e for<br />
approval<br />
Adhoc<br />
Assignm<br />
ents<br />
(GGPP/0<br />
05/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentag<br />
e ad hoc<br />
reports<br />
issued<br />
100%<br />
of ad<br />
hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
issued<br />
Percentage<br />
ad hoc<br />
reports<br />
issued<br />
100%<br />
of ad<br />
hoc<br />
reports<br />
issued<br />
Percentage<br />
ad hoc<br />
reports<br />
issued<br />
100%<br />
of ad<br />
hoc<br />
reports<br />
issued
362<br />
Conduct<br />
the<br />
assignme<br />
nt and<br />
issue<br />
final<br />
Report to<br />
Manage<br />
ment and<br />
Audit<br />
committe<br />
e<br />
To facilitate<br />
payments of Auditor<br />
General South<br />
Africa<br />
To coordinate the<br />
activities of the<br />
Audit committee<br />
Issue<br />
Notice<br />
and<br />
Agenda<br />
Obtain<br />
items<br />
from<br />
different<br />
departme<br />
nt and<br />
Audit<br />
fees<br />
external<br />
(GGPP/0<br />
06/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Audit<br />
Committ<br />
ee<br />
(GGPP/0<br />
07/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentag<br />
e payment<br />
facilitation<br />
for Auditor<br />
General<br />
SA<br />
%<br />
facilitation<br />
of AC<br />
activities<br />
100%<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
facilita<br />
ted<br />
100%<br />
Facilit<br />
ation<br />
Percentage<br />
payment<br />
facilitation for<br />
Auditor<br />
General SA<br />
% facilitation<br />
of AC<br />
activities<br />
100%<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
facilitat<br />
ed<br />
100%<br />
Facilita<br />
tion<br />
Percentage<br />
payment<br />
facilitation<br />
for Auditor<br />
General SA<br />
% facilitation<br />
of AC<br />
activities<br />
100%<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
facilitat<br />
ed<br />
100%<br />
Facilita<br />
tion<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R3,303,621.56<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R3,472,106.26<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R3,642,<strong>23</strong>9.47<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R500 000.00<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R525 500.00<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R551 250.00<br />
SDM
363<br />
package<br />
them<br />
To procure an<br />
electronic Internal<br />
Audit working paper<br />
system<br />
Issue the<br />
Audit<br />
Packs<br />
Attend<br />
the<br />
meetings<br />
Procure<br />
ment of<br />
working<br />
paper<br />
system<br />
Electroni<br />
c System<br />
(GGPP/0<br />
08/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
%<br />
Procurem<br />
ent of IA<br />
Electronic<br />
System<br />
100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R200 000.00<br />
20<strong>14</strong>-2015: R<br />
209 800<br />
2015-2016: 0<br />
SDM<br />
To<br />
foster<br />
intergovernmental<br />
relations<br />
Issue<br />
notice<br />
Prepare<br />
the<br />
documen<br />
t<br />
Attend<br />
the<br />
meetings<br />
IGR<br />
# of IGR<br />
meetings<br />
attended<br />
8 # of IGR<br />
meetings<br />
attended<br />
8 # of IGR<br />
meetings<br />
attended<br />
8 R0<br />
MM’s IGR<br />
SDM
364<br />
To monitor<br />
attendance to AG<br />
matters towards<br />
clean audit<br />
Operatio<br />
n Clean<br />
Audit<br />
(GGPP/0<br />
09/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
Monitoring<br />
to<br />
attendanc<br />
e to AG<br />
matters<br />
100%<br />
monito<br />
ring<br />
Percentage<br />
Monitoring to<br />
attendance<br />
to AG<br />
matters<br />
100%<br />
monito<br />
ring<br />
Percentage<br />
Monitoring to<br />
attendance<br />
to AG<br />
matters<br />
100%<br />
monito<br />
ring<br />
N/A<br />
SDM
365<br />
RISK MANAGEMENT WITH OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND BUDGET<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
Indicator Target Indicato<br />
r<br />
Target Indicator Target<br />
To appraise<br />
the<br />
institution on<br />
risks<br />
By arranging<br />
and<br />
conducting<br />
workshops<br />
and interviews<br />
Risk<br />
Manageme<br />
nt(GGPP/02<br />
0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
strategic,<br />
Operational,<br />
Process risk<br />
assessments<br />
conducted<br />
% of project<br />
risk<br />
assessments<br />
completed<br />
1 strategic<br />
risk, 7<br />
operational<br />
&<br />
processes<br />
assessmen<br />
ts<br />
conducted<br />
100% of<br />
project risk<br />
assessmen<br />
ts<br />
completed<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
strategic,<br />
Operation<br />
al and<br />
Process<br />
risk<br />
assessme<br />
nts<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
% of<br />
project<br />
risk<br />
assessme<br />
nts<br />
complete<br />
d<br />
1<br />
strategic<br />
risk, 7<br />
operation<br />
al &<br />
processes<br />
assessme<br />
nts<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
100% of<br />
project<br />
risk<br />
assessme<br />
nts<br />
complete<br />
d<br />
Number of<br />
strategic ,7<br />
operational<br />
&<br />
processes<br />
assessmen<br />
ts<br />
conducted<br />
% of project<br />
risk<br />
assessmen<br />
ts<br />
completed<br />
1 strategic<br />
risk, 7<br />
operational<br />
&<br />
processes<br />
assessmen<br />
ts<br />
conducted<br />
100% of<br />
project risk<br />
assessmen<br />
ts<br />
completed<br />
N/A<br />
N/A
366<br />
% of<br />
properties<br />
and<br />
operational<br />
sites<br />
surveyed<br />
100% of<br />
properties<br />
and<br />
operational<br />
sites<br />
surveyed<br />
% of<br />
properties<br />
and<br />
operation<br />
al sites<br />
surveyed<br />
100% of<br />
properties<br />
and<br />
operation<br />
al sites<br />
surveyed<br />
% of<br />
properties<br />
and<br />
operational<br />
sites<br />
surveyed<br />
100% of<br />
properties<br />
and<br />
operational<br />
sites<br />
surveyed<br />
To<br />
safeguard<br />
the assets of<br />
SDM<br />
through<br />
alternative<br />
techniques<br />
of risk<br />
transfer<br />
By appraising<br />
the<br />
appropriatenes<br />
s of insurance<br />
contracts,<br />
review the<br />
adequacy of<br />
cover, and<br />
renew policy<br />
Assets<br />
Insurance/I<br />
nsurance<br />
policy<br />
contract<br />
(GGPP/024/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentage<br />
of assets<br />
coverage<br />
100%<br />
coverage of<br />
insurable<br />
assets<br />
Percentag<br />
e of<br />
assets<br />
coverage<br />
100%<br />
coverage<br />
of<br />
insurable<br />
assets<br />
Percentage<br />
of assets<br />
coverage<br />
100%<br />
coverage of<br />
insurable<br />
assets<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R3<br />
000 000,00<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R3<br />
153 000<br />
2015/2016:R3<br />
307 497<br />
SDM<br />
To<br />
safeguard<br />
SDM assets,<br />
its<br />
employees<br />
and visitors<br />
By managing<br />
the operations<br />
of security<br />
services,<br />
review the<br />
allocation of<br />
security at<br />
operational<br />
sites,<br />
Security<br />
Operations<br />
(GGPP/025/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentage<br />
reduction in<br />
security<br />
related<br />
incidents<br />
100%<br />
safeguarde<br />
d assets<br />
and<br />
employees<br />
and visitors<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
reduction<br />
in security<br />
related<br />
incidents<br />
100%<br />
safeguard<br />
ed assets<br />
and<br />
employee<br />
s and<br />
visitors<br />
Percentage<br />
reduction in<br />
security<br />
related<br />
incidents<br />
100%<br />
safeguarde<br />
d assets<br />
and<br />
employees<br />
and visitors<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R1<br />
7 000 000,00<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R1<br />
7 867 000,00<br />
2015/2016:R1<br />
8 742 483<br />
SDM
367<br />
To ascertain<br />
the level of<br />
integrity of<br />
staff and<br />
service<br />
providers<br />
To stem out<br />
fraud and<br />
corruption<br />
activities<br />
By performing<br />
security vetting<br />
on staff and<br />
service<br />
providers<br />
By<br />
implementing<br />
an anticorruption<br />
strategy and<br />
fraud<br />
prevention<br />
plan<br />
Security<br />
Vetting<br />
(GGPP/026/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Anti-fraud<br />
and<br />
corruption<br />
Hotline<br />
(GGPP/028/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentage<br />
implementati<br />
on of vetting<br />
process for<br />
staff and<br />
service<br />
providers<br />
Percentage<br />
implementati<br />
on of antifraud<br />
and<br />
corruption<br />
hotline<br />
100%<br />
implementa<br />
tion of<br />
vetting<br />
process for<br />
staff and<br />
service<br />
providers<br />
100%<br />
implementa<br />
tion of antifraud<br />
and<br />
corruption<br />
hotline<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
vetting<br />
process<br />
for staff<br />
and<br />
service<br />
providers<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
anti-fraud<br />
and<br />
corruption<br />
hotline<br />
100%<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
vetting<br />
process<br />
for staff<br />
and<br />
service<br />
providers<br />
100%<br />
implemen<br />
tation of<br />
anti-fraud<br />
and<br />
corruption<br />
hotline<br />
Percentage<br />
implementa<br />
tion of<br />
vetting<br />
process for<br />
staff and<br />
service<br />
providers<br />
Percentage<br />
implementa<br />
tion of antifraud<br />
and<br />
corruption<br />
hotline<br />
100%<br />
implementa<br />
tion of<br />
vetting<br />
process for<br />
staff and<br />
service<br />
providers<br />
100%<br />
implementa<br />
tion of antifraud<br />
and<br />
corruption<br />
hotline<br />
R0<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R8<br />
0 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R8<br />
4080<br />
2015/2016:R8<br />
8 200<br />
Internal<br />
SDM<br />
To secure<br />
business<br />
sustainability<br />
(SDM)<br />
By developing<br />
business<br />
continuity<br />
management<br />
plan<br />
Business<br />
Continuity<br />
management<br />
(GGPP/029/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percentage<br />
development<br />
of business<br />
continuity<br />
management<br />
plan<br />
100%<br />
developed<br />
business<br />
continuity<br />
manageme<br />
nt plan<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
developm<br />
ent of<br />
business<br />
continuity<br />
managem<br />
ent plan<br />
100%<br />
develope<br />
d<br />
business<br />
continuity<br />
managem<br />
ent plan<br />
Percentage<br />
developme<br />
nt of<br />
business<br />
continuity<br />
manageme<br />
nt plan<br />
100%<br />
developed<br />
business<br />
continuity<br />
manageme<br />
nt plan<br />
R0<br />
SDM
368<br />
To raise risk<br />
management<br />
awareness<br />
amongst<br />
staff and<br />
councillors<br />
By providing<br />
training to<br />
staff and<br />
councillors<br />
Risk<br />
Management<br />
awareness<br />
training<br />
(GGPP/030/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives for<br />
risk<br />
awareness<br />
conducted<br />
2 initiatives<br />
for risk<br />
awareness<br />
conducted<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
for risk<br />
awarenes<br />
s<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
2<br />
initiatives<br />
for risk<br />
awarenes<br />
s<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
for risk<br />
awareness<br />
conducted<br />
2 initiatives<br />
for risk<br />
awareness<br />
conducted<br />
R0<br />
SDM<br />
To<br />
coordinate<br />
and report<br />
on the risk<br />
management<br />
activities<br />
To foster<br />
intergovernm<br />
ental<br />
relations on<br />
all matters of<br />
mutual<br />
interests<br />
To manage<br />
claim<br />
incidents<br />
that demand<br />
excess<br />
By compilation<br />
of quarterly<br />
risk<br />
management<br />
and<br />
compliance<br />
reports<br />
By<br />
strengthening<br />
the<br />
cooperation of<br />
governance<br />
By constant<br />
validation of<br />
submitted<br />
claims<br />
Risk<br />
Management<br />
reporting<br />
(GGPP/031/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
MM’s office<br />
Inter<br />
Government<br />
al Relations<br />
(IGR)<br />
Excess on<br />
insurance<br />
(GGPP/032/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
risk<br />
management<br />
reports<br />
generated<br />
# of district<br />
and<br />
provincial<br />
IGR<br />
meetings<br />
Percentage<br />
insurance<br />
excess<br />
processed<br />
4 risk<br />
manageme<br />
nt reports<br />
generated<br />
4 district<br />
and 4<br />
provincial<br />
meetings<br />
100%<br />
insurance<br />
excess<br />
processed<br />
Number<br />
of risk<br />
managem<br />
ent<br />
reports<br />
generated<br />
# of<br />
district<br />
and<br />
provincial<br />
IGR<br />
meetings<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
insurance<br />
excess<br />
processe<br />
d<br />
4 risk<br />
managem<br />
ent<br />
reports<br />
generated<br />
4 district<br />
and 4<br />
provincial<br />
meetings<br />
100%<br />
insurance<br />
excess<br />
processe<br />
d<br />
Number of<br />
risk<br />
manageme<br />
nt reports<br />
generated<br />
# of district<br />
and<br />
provincial<br />
IGR<br />
meetings<br />
Percentage<br />
insurance<br />
excess<br />
processed<br />
4 risk<br />
manageme<br />
nt reports<br />
generated<br />
4 district<br />
and 4<br />
provincial<br />
meetings<br />
100%<br />
insurance<br />
excess<br />
processed<br />
R0<br />
SDM<br />
R100,000 SDM<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R500,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
R525,500<br />
2015/2016<br />
R551,249.50<br />
SDM
369<br />
OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR INDICATORS AND TARGETS <strong>IDP</strong>/BUDGET <strong>2013</strong>-2016 MTREF<br />
Objective<br />
To<br />
integrate<br />
youth in<br />
the socioeconomic<br />
mainstrea<br />
m<br />
Strategie<br />
s<br />
Drive<br />
youth<br />
developm<br />
ent<br />
through<br />
capacity<br />
building<br />
and<br />
implement<br />
ation of<br />
integrated<br />
youth<br />
month<br />
program<br />
Facilitate<br />
integration<br />
and<br />
alignment<br />
of district<br />
Project<br />
Youth<br />
Developmen<br />
t<br />
(GGPP/033/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Indicato Target Indicato Target Indicato<br />
r<br />
r<br />
r<br />
Number<br />
of youth<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
3 Number<br />
of youth<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
3 Number<br />
of youth<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Target<br />
3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R 300 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/215 R<br />
315 300<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R330 750<br />
Fundi<br />
ng<br />
Sour<br />
ce<br />
SDM<br />
and<br />
Privat<br />
e<br />
Fundi<br />
ng
370<br />
To provide<br />
support<br />
and<br />
advocacy<br />
on<br />
children’s<br />
rights and<br />
their<br />
welfare<br />
initiatives<br />
with<br />
NYDA<br />
Establish<br />
ment of<br />
project<br />
steering<br />
committee<br />
Monitoring<br />
and<br />
evaluation<br />
of<br />
implement<br />
ation<br />
Ensure<br />
provision<br />
of<br />
comprehe<br />
nsive<br />
support to<br />
children<br />
centres<br />
and their<br />
programm<br />
es<br />
Develop<br />
participato<br />
ry<br />
mechanis<br />
m on<br />
national<br />
and<br />
Children<br />
developmen<br />
t<br />
(GGPP/034/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
children’<br />
s<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
2 children<br />
initiatives<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
children’<br />
s<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
2 children<br />
initiatives<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
children’<br />
s<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
2 children<br />
initiatives<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R 150 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/215<br />
R157 650<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R165 375<br />
SDM
371<br />
Ensure<br />
adequate<br />
caring and<br />
protection<br />
of the<br />
elderly<br />
To<br />
implement<br />
programs<br />
for people<br />
living with<br />
disabilities<br />
To provide<br />
support<br />
and<br />
advocacy<br />
on women<br />
and gender<br />
provincial<br />
children<br />
program<br />
Facilitate<br />
participati<br />
on and<br />
integration<br />
of elderly<br />
people in<br />
society in<br />
governme<br />
nt<br />
programm<br />
es<br />
Facilitate<br />
integration<br />
of people<br />
with<br />
disability<br />
in the<br />
mainstrea<br />
m society<br />
though<br />
targeted<br />
programm<br />
es<br />
Initiate<br />
and<br />
implement<br />
women<br />
focal<br />
month<br />
Aged<br />
advocacy<br />
programme<br />
(GGPP/035/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Programme<br />
for people<br />
living with<br />
disabilities<br />
(GGPP/036/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Women and<br />
Gender<br />
programmes<br />
(GGPP/037/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
No of<br />
aged<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s for<br />
people<br />
living<br />
with<br />
disabiliti<br />
es<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en for<br />
3 (2 mandela<br />
days, one<br />
international<br />
older persons<br />
day)<br />
4 (1 eye care,<br />
2 deaf<br />
awarenes, 3<br />
disability, 4<br />
mental/braile<br />
and<br />
awareness)<br />
3 (1 women’s<br />
month launch,<br />
2 fun walks, 3<br />
international<br />
woman’s day)<br />
No of<br />
aged<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s for<br />
people<br />
living<br />
with<br />
disabiliti<br />
es<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en for<br />
3 (2 mandela<br />
days, one<br />
international<br />
older persons<br />
day)<br />
4 (1 eye care,<br />
2 deaf<br />
awarenes, 3<br />
disability, 4<br />
mental/braile<br />
and<br />
awareness)<br />
3 (1 women’s<br />
month launch,<br />
2 fun walks, 3<br />
international<br />
woman’s day)<br />
No of<br />
aged<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s for<br />
people<br />
living<br />
with<br />
disabiliti<br />
es<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
undertak<br />
en for<br />
3 (2 mandela<br />
days, one<br />
international<br />
older persons<br />
day)<br />
4 (1 eye care,<br />
2 deaf<br />
awarenes, 3<br />
disability, 4<br />
mental/braile<br />
and<br />
awareness)<br />
3 (1 women’s<br />
month launch,<br />
2 fun walks, 3<br />
international<br />
woman’s day)<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R 250 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/215 R<br />
R262 750<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R 275 625<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R200 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/215 R<br />
210 200<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R220 500<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R 300 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
R 315 300<br />
2015/2016<br />
R 330 750<br />
SDM<br />
SDM<br />
SDM
372<br />
developme<br />
nt<br />
programm<br />
es<br />
To forge<br />
strong and<br />
sustainable<br />
civil society<br />
partnership<br />
on<br />
constitution<br />
al values<br />
To provide<br />
partnership<br />
and<br />
programm<br />
e<br />
Intensity<br />
awarenes<br />
s<br />
campaign<br />
s on<br />
eradicatio<br />
n of<br />
gender<br />
based<br />
violence<br />
Strengthe<br />
n social<br />
cohesion<br />
through<br />
culture,<br />
religion<br />
and<br />
tradition<br />
Mobilise<br />
civil<br />
society to<br />
adhere<br />
and<br />
observe<br />
charter of<br />
positive<br />
values<br />
Implement<br />
uniform<br />
integrated<br />
Moral<br />
Regeneratio<br />
n movement<br />
(MRM)<br />
(GGPP/038/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Executive<br />
support<br />
Traditional<br />
women<br />
and<br />
gender<br />
develop<br />
ment<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
revival of<br />
MRM<br />
committ<br />
ee<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
support<br />
100% revival<br />
of MRM<br />
committee<br />
(revival 50%,<br />
policy 25%,<br />
program 25%)<br />
100%<br />
support(1<br />
traditional<br />
women<br />
and<br />
gender<br />
develop<br />
ment<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
revival of<br />
MRM<br />
committ<br />
ee<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
support<br />
100% revival<br />
of MRM<br />
committee<br />
100%<br />
support(1<br />
traditional<br />
women<br />
and<br />
gender<br />
develop<br />
ment<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
revival of<br />
MRM<br />
committ<br />
ee<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
support<br />
100% revival<br />
of MRM<br />
committee<br />
100%<br />
support(1<br />
traditional<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R 50 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
R 52 550<br />
2015/2016<br />
R 55 125<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R 500 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
SDM<br />
SDM
373<br />
support to<br />
Magoshi<br />
To ensure<br />
improved<br />
communic<br />
ations with<br />
internal<br />
and<br />
external<br />
stakeholde<br />
rs<br />
To ensure<br />
integrated<br />
marketing<br />
support to<br />
traditional<br />
leaders<br />
Provide<br />
regular<br />
newsletter<br />
services<br />
Stage<br />
high<br />
quality<br />
events<br />
Support to<br />
communit<br />
y media<br />
Provide<br />
marketing<br />
platforms<br />
leadership;<br />
Mayoral<br />
committee;<br />
Support to<br />
families<br />
(GGPP/039/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Communicat<br />
ions and<br />
Media<br />
relations<br />
on stake<br />
holder<br />
engagement<br />
(GGPP/040/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Communicat<br />
ions and<br />
Media<br />
relations<br />
on<br />
Newsletter<br />
(GGPP/040/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Marketing<br />
and<br />
Branding<br />
to<br />
tradition<br />
al<br />
leadersh<br />
ip,<br />
Mayoral<br />
committ<br />
ee;<br />
Support<br />
to<br />
families<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s for<br />
stakehol<br />
der<br />
engage<br />
ment<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
newslett<br />
ers<br />
issued<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
initiative<br />
leaders, 2<br />
mayoral<br />
committees, 3<br />
vulnerable<br />
families)<br />
Eight (8)<br />
stakeholder<br />
engagements<br />
8 newsletters<br />
(1)4 internal,<br />
(2)4 external<br />
100%<br />
initiatives for<br />
marketing and<br />
to<br />
tradition<br />
al<br />
leadersh<br />
ip,<br />
Mayoral<br />
committ<br />
ee;<br />
Support<br />
to<br />
families<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s for<br />
stakehol<br />
der<br />
engage<br />
ment<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
newslett<br />
ers<br />
issued<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
initiative<br />
leaders, 2<br />
mayoral<br />
committees, 3<br />
vulnerable<br />
families)<br />
Eight (8)<br />
stakeholder<br />
engagements<br />
8 newsletters<br />
(1)4 internal,<br />
(2)4 external<br />
100%<br />
initiatives for<br />
marketing and<br />
to<br />
tradition<br />
al<br />
leadersh<br />
ip,<br />
Mayoral<br />
committ<br />
ee;<br />
Support<br />
to<br />
families<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s for<br />
stakehol<br />
der<br />
engage<br />
ment<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
newslett<br />
ers<br />
issued<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
initiative<br />
leaders, 2<br />
mayoral<br />
committees, 3<br />
vulnerable<br />
families)<br />
Eight (8)<br />
stakeholder<br />
engagements<br />
8 newsletters<br />
(1)4 internal,<br />
(2)4 external<br />
100%<br />
initiatives for<br />
marketing and<br />
R 525 500<br />
2015/2016<br />
R 551 250<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R 3,<br />
220,272<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
R<br />
3,808,006<br />
2015/2016<br />
R<br />
3,896,598<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R 437 342<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
SDM<br />
SDM
374<br />
of the<br />
district<br />
Provide<br />
strategic<br />
support to<br />
Executive<br />
Mayor ,<br />
enhance<br />
social<br />
cohesion<br />
and nation<br />
building<br />
To conduct<br />
a study on<br />
customer<br />
satisfaction<br />
for the<br />
district<br />
and its<br />
products<br />
Ensure<br />
branding<br />
in all<br />
activities<br />
Ensure<br />
preservati<br />
on of<br />
heritage<br />
Contribute<br />
in<br />
liberation<br />
struggle<br />
heritage<br />
Promote<br />
IGR<br />
Engage<br />
customers<br />
(GGPP/041/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Strategic<br />
Events<br />
(GGPP/042/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Customer<br />
satisfaction<br />
(GGPP/043/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
s for<br />
marketin<br />
g and<br />
branding<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s for<br />
strategic<br />
events<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
custome<br />
r<br />
satisfacti<br />
on<br />
survey<br />
branding (1.<br />
Buildings 25%,<br />
2.events50%,<br />
3.<br />
Promotionals<br />
25%<br />
3 - (1<br />
heritage,2.Exc<br />
ellence<br />
awards, 3.Golf<br />
day<br />
100%<br />
customer<br />
satisfaction<br />
survey(ToR,<br />
Procurement,<br />
report)<br />
s for<br />
marketin<br />
g and<br />
branding<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s for<br />
strategic<br />
events<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
custome<br />
r<br />
satisfacti<br />
on<br />
survey<br />
branding (1.<br />
Buildings 25%,<br />
2.events50%,<br />
3.<br />
Promotionals<br />
25%<br />
3 - (1<br />
heritage,2.Exc<br />
ellence<br />
awards, 3.Golf<br />
day<br />
100%<br />
customer<br />
satisfaction<br />
survey(ToR,<br />
Procurement,<br />
report)<br />
s for<br />
marketin<br />
g and<br />
branding<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiative<br />
s for<br />
strategic<br />
events<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
custome<br />
r<br />
satisfacti<br />
on<br />
survey<br />
branding (1.<br />
Buildings 25%,<br />
2.events50%,<br />
3.<br />
Promotionals<br />
25%<br />
3 - (1<br />
heritage,2.Exc<br />
ellence<br />
awards, 3.Golf<br />
day)<br />
100%<br />
customer<br />
satisfaction<br />
survey(ToR,<br />
Procurement,<br />
report)<br />
R 459 647<br />
2015/2016<br />
R 482 169<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
R 1 200<br />
000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
R 1 261<br />
200<br />
2015/2016<br />
R 1 322<br />
999<br />
R50 000
375<br />
To comply<br />
with<br />
service<br />
standards<br />
Proritise<br />
people’s<br />
needs for<br />
service<br />
delivery<br />
Batho pele<br />
event<br />
(GGPP/044/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number<br />
of batho<br />
pele<br />
initiative<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
1 batho pele<br />
event<br />
Number<br />
of batho<br />
pele<br />
initiative<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
1 batho pele<br />
event<br />
Number<br />
of batho<br />
pele<br />
initiative<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
1 batho pele<br />
event<br />
R50 000<br />
To foster<br />
internation<br />
al relations<br />
Engage<br />
internation<br />
al peers<br />
International<br />
relations<br />
(GGPP/045/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
internati<br />
onal<br />
relations<br />
fostered<br />
100%<br />
international<br />
relations as<br />
per political<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
internati<br />
onal<br />
relations<br />
fostered<br />
100%<br />
international<br />
relations<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
internati<br />
onal<br />
relations<br />
fostered<br />
100%<br />
international<br />
relations<br />
R50 000
376<br />
OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER INDICATORS AND TARGETS <strong>IDP</strong>/BUDGET <strong>2013</strong>-2016 MTREF<br />
SECRETARIAT<br />
Objective<br />
To<br />
maximise<br />
accountabili<br />
ty<br />
Strategies<br />
Oversight<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Project Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Oversight Percentage<br />
Percentage<br />
Percentage<br />
visits initiatives<br />
initiatives<br />
initiatives<br />
(GGPP/04 employed<br />
employed to<br />
employed to<br />
6/<strong>2013</strong>- to support<br />
support<br />
support<br />
20<strong>14</strong>) oversight<br />
oversight<br />
oversight<br />
visits/opera<br />
visits/operations<br />
visits/operation<br />
tions<br />
s<br />
100%<br />
initiatives<br />
employed to<br />
support<br />
oversight<br />
visits/operati<br />
ons (1<br />
previsits/Res<br />
earch 25% 2.<br />
Research<br />
report 25%<br />
3.admin<br />
support 25%<br />
4.exit report<br />
25%).<br />
100%<br />
initiatives<br />
employed<br />
to support<br />
oversight<br />
visits/opera<br />
tions<br />
(1<br />
previsits/Re<br />
search 25%<br />
2.<br />
Research<br />
report 25%<br />
3.admin<br />
support<br />
25% 4.exit<br />
report<br />
25%).<br />
100% initiatives<br />
employed to<br />
support<br />
oversight<br />
visits/operations<br />
(1<br />
previsits/Resear<br />
ch 25% 2.<br />
Research report<br />
25% 3.admin<br />
support 25%<br />
4.exit report<br />
25%).<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R500 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R525 500<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R551 250<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
SDM
377<br />
# of<br />
oversight<br />
reports<br />
produced<br />
10 oversight<br />
reports<br />
# of oversight<br />
reports<br />
produced<br />
10<br />
oversight<br />
reports<br />
# of oversight<br />
reports<br />
produced<br />
10 oversight<br />
reports<br />
To<br />
rationalise<br />
Council<br />
activities<br />
To<br />
maximise<br />
compliance<br />
and<br />
uniformity<br />
To<br />
effectively<br />
control<br />
internal<br />
resources<br />
(Human;<br />
Financial;<br />
etc)<br />
Policy<br />
assessmen<br />
t<br />
Internal<br />
control<br />
Implementa<br />
tion of<br />
Council<br />
Activities<br />
Calendar<br />
(GGPP/04<br />
7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Policy<br />
developme<br />
nt and or<br />
review<br />
(GGPP/04<br />
8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Internal<br />
Control<br />
measures<br />
%<br />
compilation<br />
of Council<br />
Activities<br />
Calendar<br />
Number of<br />
policies<br />
reviewed<br />
Number of<br />
reports on<br />
on-going<br />
oversight of<br />
programme<br />
s and<br />
projects<br />
provided to<br />
the Chief<br />
100%<br />
Council<br />
Activities<br />
Calendar<br />
Compilation<br />
5 policies<br />
(public<br />
participation,<br />
petition, ward<br />
committee<br />
incentives,<br />
district ward<br />
committees<br />
forum, district<br />
MPAC)<br />
% compilation of<br />
Council<br />
Activities<br />
Calendar<br />
Number of<br />
policies<br />
reviewed<br />
4 Number of<br />
reports on ongoing<br />
oversight<br />
of programmes<br />
and projects<br />
provided to the<br />
Chief<br />
Operations<br />
Officer w.r.t<br />
100%<br />
Council<br />
Activities<br />
Calendar<br />
Compilation<br />
3 policies<br />
developed<br />
and or<br />
reviewed<br />
% compilation<br />
of Council<br />
Activities<br />
Calendar<br />
Number of<br />
policies<br />
reviewed<br />
4 Number of<br />
reports on ongoing<br />
oversight of<br />
programmes<br />
and projects<br />
provided to the<br />
Chief<br />
Operations<br />
100% Council<br />
Activities<br />
Calendar<br />
Compilation<br />
3 policies<br />
developed and<br />
or reviewed<br />
R0<br />
N/A<br />
N/A<br />
4 N/A N/A
378<br />
To attain<br />
Clean Audit<br />
by ensuring<br />
compliance<br />
to all<br />
government<br />
and<br />
reporting<br />
requiremen<br />
ts<br />
To<br />
effectively<br />
encourage<br />
a Risk free<br />
working<br />
environmen<br />
t<br />
Operation<br />
Clean Audit<br />
Risk<br />
Manageme<br />
nt<br />
Internal<br />
Audit<br />
reports<br />
(GGPP/01<br />
8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Risk<br />
Manageme<br />
nt Reports<br />
(GGPP/02<br />
0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Operations<br />
Officer w.r.t<br />
Department<br />
Austerity<br />
Measurers;<br />
Overtime;<br />
Leave;<br />
Travelling<br />
Allowances<br />
Internal<br />
Audit<br />
reports<br />
Disclaimer<br />
Risk<br />
Manageme<br />
nt Reports<br />
100% AG<br />
issues<br />
resolved.<br />
Unqualified<br />
Audit Opinion<br />
100% Risk<br />
Issues<br />
resolved<br />
Department<br />
Austerity<br />
Measurers;<br />
Overtime;<br />
Leave;<br />
Travelling<br />
Allowances<br />
Internal Audit<br />
reports<br />
Disclaimer<br />
Risk<br />
Management<br />
Reports<br />
100% AG<br />
issues<br />
resolved.<br />
Unqualified<br />
Audit<br />
Opinion<br />
100% Risk<br />
Issues<br />
resolved<br />
Officer w.r.t<br />
Department<br />
Austerity<br />
Measurers;<br />
Overtime;<br />
Leave;<br />
Travelling<br />
Allowances<br />
Internal Audit<br />
reports<br />
Disclaimer<br />
Risk<br />
Management<br />
Reports<br />
100% AG issues<br />
resolved.<br />
Unqualified<br />
Audit Opinion<br />
100% Risk<br />
Issues resolved<br />
N/A<br />
N/A<br />
N/A<br />
N/A<br />
Customer<br />
satisfaction<br />
survey<br />
(GGPP/04<br />
3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Batho pele<br />
(GGPP/04<br />
R50 000<br />
R50 000<br />
SDM<br />
SDM
379<br />
4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Internationa<br />
l relations<br />
(GGPP/04<br />
5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
R50 000<br />
SDM<br />
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
Objective<br />
To<br />
maximise<br />
accountabili<br />
ty<br />
Strategies<br />
Host<br />
Speakers<br />
outreach<br />
activities<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Project Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Council<br />
Two (2)<br />
Two (2)<br />
outreaches<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
employed<br />
to support<br />
council<br />
outreaches<br />
Two (2)<br />
(draft annual<br />
report, draft<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
employed<br />
to support<br />
council<br />
outreaches<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
employed<br />
to support<br />
council<br />
outreache<br />
s<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R395 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R415 <strong>14</strong>5<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R435 487<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
Source<br />
SDM
380<br />
Ward<br />
committees<br />
service<br />
delivery<br />
engagemen<br />
ts<br />
(GGPP/05<br />
0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
engagemen<br />
ts held<br />
2<br />
engagement<br />
s held<br />
Number of<br />
engagemen<br />
ts held<br />
2<br />
engagement<br />
s held<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
meetings<br />
held<br />
2 engagements<br />
held<br />
R300 000<br />
IGR (Chief<br />
whip &<br />
Speaker)<br />
Public<br />
participatio<br />
n<br />
Number of<br />
activities<br />
held<br />
4 meetings<br />
held<br />
Number of<br />
activities<br />
held<br />
4 meetings<br />
held<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
activities<br />
held<br />
4 meetings held<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R10,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R10,510<br />
SDM<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R11,024<br />
To restore<br />
nation<br />
identity<br />
Geographic<br />
Names<br />
Change<br />
Public<br />
participatio<br />
n on<br />
Geographic<br />
Names<br />
Change<br />
(GGPP/05<br />
5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
inititatives<br />
employed<br />
to<br />
coordinate<br />
geographic<br />
name<br />
change<br />
process<br />
Two (2)<br />
initiatives<br />
1.Renaming<br />
of burgesfort<br />
town<br />
2.Naming of<br />
DeHoop<br />
Dam<br />
Number of<br />
inititatives<br />
employed<br />
to<br />
coordinate<br />
geographic<br />
name<br />
change<br />
process<br />
Two (2)<br />
initiatives<br />
1.Renaming<br />
of burgesfort<br />
town<br />
2.Naming of<br />
DeHoop<br />
Dam<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
inititatives<br />
employed<br />
to<br />
coordinat<br />
e<br />
geographi<br />
c name<br />
change<br />
process<br />
Two (2)<br />
initiatives<br />
1.Renaming of<br />
burgesfort town<br />
2.Naming of<br />
DeHoop Dam<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R130,800<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R137,470.8<br />
0<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R<strong>14</strong>4,206.8<br />
7<br />
SDM<br />
Budget<br />
speech<br />
Percentage<br />
facilitation<br />
for budget<br />
100%<br />
(stakeholder<br />
mobilisation<br />
Percentage<br />
facilitation<br />
for budget<br />
100%<br />
(stakeholder<br />
mobilisation<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
facilitation<br />
100%<br />
(stakeholder<br />
mobilisation<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R350,000
381<br />
(GGPP/05<br />
1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
speech<br />
event<br />
50%,<br />
logistical<br />
preparations<br />
50%)<br />
speech<br />
event<br />
50%,<br />
logistical<br />
preparations<br />
50%)<br />
for budget<br />
speech<br />
event<br />
50%, logistical<br />
preparations50<br />
%)<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R367,850<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R385,874<br />
Declaration<br />
of<br />
Councillors<br />
interests<br />
(GGPP/05<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Number of<br />
councillors’<br />
declaration<br />
s<br />
processed<br />
49<br />
councillors<br />
declaration<br />
forms<br />
processed<br />
Number of<br />
councillors’<br />
declaration<br />
s<br />
processed<br />
49<br />
councillors<br />
declaration<br />
forms<br />
processed<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
councillor<br />
s’<br />
declaratio<br />
ns<br />
processe<br />
d<br />
49 councillors<br />
declaration<br />
forms processed<br />
R0<br />
COUNCILLOR’S WELFARE<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To provide Attend to Councillor<br />
conducive councillor Welfare<br />
environment queries (GGPP/053/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
for<br />
Facilitate<br />
councillor workshop<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
functioning<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
employed<br />
for<br />
councillors<br />
welfare<br />
1<br />
(Income<br />
Tax Act)<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
employed<br />
for<br />
councillors<br />
welfare<br />
1(Income<br />
Tax Act)<br />
Number of<br />
initiatives<br />
employed<br />
for<br />
councillors<br />
welfare<br />
1(Income<br />
Tax Act)<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
R0<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
SDM
382<br />
CAPACITY BUILDING<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Funding<br />
Source<br />
Objective Strategies Project<br />
To provide Facilitate<br />
ammunition training for<br />
for Section 79<br />
councillors committees<br />
operations<br />
Facilitate<br />
horizontal<br />
learning<br />
Training of<br />
councillors<br />
(GGPP/054/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />
Number of<br />
councillors<br />
trained<br />
49<br />
councillors<br />
Number of<br />
councillors<br />
trained<br />
49<br />
councillors<br />
Number of<br />
councillors<br />
trained<br />
49<br />
councillors<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R350,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>-<br />
2015:<br />
R367 850<br />
SDM<br />
2015-<br />
2016:<br />
R385 875
383<br />
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND <strong>IDP</strong> WITH OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES AND BUDGET<br />
Indicators and Targets<br />
MTERF<br />
Budget<br />
Estimate<br />
Fundin<br />
g<br />
Source<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2<br />
Objective<br />
Strategies<br />
Project<br />
Indicator Target Indicator Indicator Target Indicat<br />
or<br />
To ensure<br />
institutional<br />
performance culture<br />
Implement<br />
the PMS<br />
Framework<br />
PMS<br />
Framework<br />
(GGPP/056/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Agreements<br />
/commitmen<br />
ts<br />
(GGPP/057/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
<strong>Review</strong>/App<br />
raisals<br />
(GGPP/058/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Percenta<br />
ge review<br />
of PMS<br />
Framewo<br />
rk<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
commitm<br />
ents<br />
conclude<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
reviews<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
100%<br />
review of<br />
PMS<br />
framewor<br />
k<br />
100%<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
commitm<br />
ents<br />
conclude<br />
d<br />
2<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
reviews<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
Percenta<br />
ge review<br />
of PMS<br />
Framewo<br />
rk<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
commitm<br />
ents<br />
conclude<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
reviews<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
100%<br />
review of<br />
PMS<br />
framewor<br />
k<br />
100%<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
commitm<br />
ents<br />
conclude<br />
d<br />
2<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
reviews<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
Percentage<br />
review of PMS<br />
Framework<br />
Percentage<br />
performance<br />
commitments<br />
concluded<br />
Number of<br />
performance<br />
reviews<br />
conducted<br />
100%<br />
review<br />
of PMS<br />
framew<br />
ork<br />
100%<br />
perform<br />
ance<br />
commit<br />
ments<br />
conclud<br />
ed<br />
2<br />
perform<br />
ance<br />
reviews<br />
conduct<br />
ed<br />
Institutional Percenta 100% Percenta 100% Percentage 100%<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R200,000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />
R210,200<br />
2015/2016:R22<br />
0 500<br />
SDM
384<br />
To ensure integrated<br />
development<br />
planning<br />
Fulfil the<br />
adopted <strong>IDP</strong><br />
process plan<br />
SDBIP<br />
(GGPP/059/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Department<br />
al SDBIP<br />
(GGPP/060/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Annual<br />
report<br />
(GGPP/061/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Compliance<br />
reporting<br />
(GGPP/062/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
Framework/<br />
process<br />
ge<br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
institution<br />
al SDBIP<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
develop<br />
mental<br />
SDBIP<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
compilati<br />
on of<br />
annual<br />
report<br />
2012/201<br />
3<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
complian<br />
ce<br />
reports<br />
submitte<br />
d<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
compilati<br />
developm<br />
ent of<br />
institution<br />
al SDBIP<br />
100%<br />
developm<br />
ent of<br />
departme<br />
ntal<br />
SDBIP<br />
100%<br />
compilati<br />
on of<br />
annual<br />
report<br />
2012/201<br />
3<br />
8<br />
complian<br />
ce<br />
reports<br />
submitted<br />
(MTAS,<br />
LGTAS)<br />
100%<br />
compilati<br />
on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />
ge<br />
developm<br />
ent of<br />
institution<br />
al SDBIP<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
developm<br />
ent of<br />
developm<br />
ental<br />
SDBIP<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
compilati<br />
on of<br />
annual<br />
report<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
3<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
complian<br />
ce<br />
reports<br />
submitted<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
compilati<br />
developm<br />
ent of<br />
institution<br />
al SDBIP<br />
100%<br />
developm<br />
ent of<br />
departme<br />
ntal<br />
SDBIP<br />
100%<br />
compilati<br />
on of<br />
annual<br />
report<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
8<br />
complian<br />
ce<br />
reports<br />
submitted<br />
(MTAS,<br />
LGTAS)<br />
100%<br />
compilati<br />
on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />
development of<br />
institutional<br />
SDBIP<br />
Percentage<br />
development of<br />
developmental<br />
SDBIP<br />
Percentage<br />
compilation of<br />
annual report<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
Number of<br />
compliance<br />
reports<br />
submitted<br />
Percentage<br />
compilation of<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
instituti<br />
onal<br />
SDBIP<br />
100%<br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
depart<br />
mental<br />
SDBIP<br />
100%<br />
compila<br />
tion of<br />
annual<br />
report<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2<br />
015<br />
8<br />
complia<br />
nce<br />
reports<br />
submitt<br />
ed<br />
(MTAS,<br />
LGTAS<br />
)<br />
100%<br />
compila<br />
tion of<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />
R800 000<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015:
385<br />
plan<br />
(GGPP/063<br />
and<br />
064/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> review<br />
(GGPP/065/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />
framewor<br />
k/process<br />
plan<br />
Percenta<br />
ge review<br />
of <strong>IDP</strong><br />
framewor<br />
k/process<br />
plan<br />
100%<br />
review of<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />
framewor<br />
k/process<br />
plan<br />
Percenta<br />
ge review<br />
of <strong>IDP</strong><br />
framewor<br />
k/process<br />
plan<br />
100%<br />
review of<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
framework/proc<br />
ess plan<br />
Percentage<br />
review of <strong>IDP</strong><br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
framew<br />
ork/pro<br />
cess<br />
plan<br />
100%<br />
review<br />
of <strong>IDP</strong><br />
R840 800<br />
2015/2016:<br />
R881 999
386<br />
5.7. PROVINCIAL AND<br />
NATIONAL AGENCIES AND<br />
DEPARTMENTS
387<br />
1. CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE, HUMAN SETTLEMENTS AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS<br />
(COGHSTA)<br />
DEVELOPMENT AREAS <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> FINANCIAL YEAR<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY Project Duration Total<br />
expenditure<br />
MTEF Estimates<br />
2012-13 <strong>2013</strong>-<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>-<br />
15<br />
<strong>2013</strong> /<br />
WARD VILLAGE SUBSIDY Beneficiaries/<br />
R'000 R'001<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(AREA) PROGRAMME Houses<br />
None<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />
MAKHUDUTHAMAGA MUNICIPALITY<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> WARDS AREAS SUBSIDY Beneficiaries/<br />
Houses<br />
Current<br />
Status<br />
8 cabrieve Rural 59 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
31 Vlaakplass Rural 72 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
8 Uitkyk/Mochadi Rural 128 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
30 Serareng Rural 68 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
30 Masanteng Rural 66 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
29 Mmakgwabe Rural 40 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
7 Dikanton Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project
388<br />
31 Makhutso Rural 35 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
TOTAL 500 None<br />
DEVELOPMENT AREAS <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> FINANCIAL YEAR<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROJECT DURATION TOTAL<br />
EXPENDI<br />
TURE<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> WARD VILLAGE<br />
(AREA)<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />
ELIAS MOTSOALEDI MUNICIPALITY<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
SUBSI<br />
DY<br />
PROG<br />
RAMM<br />
E<br />
WARDS AREAS SUBSI<br />
DY<br />
BENEFICIAR<br />
IES/HOUSES<br />
BENEFICIAR<br />
IES/HOUSES<br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
NONE<br />
MTEF ESTIMATES CURRENT<br />
STATUS<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>-15<br />
8 Elandsdoorn Rural 60 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
“A”<br />
Elandsdoorn Rural 60 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
“B”<br />
Uitspanning Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
“A”<br />
Sempupuru Rural 0 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
9 Tambo Rural 0 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Elandsdoorn<br />
“E”<br />
Rural 0 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project
389<br />
TOTA<br />
L<br />
Phooko D3 Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Phooko Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Part of Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Ngolovane<br />
10 Ntwane Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Dithabaneng Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
11 Elandsdoorn Rural 0 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
T/S<br />
Phooko Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
(small)<br />
Jabulani Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Part of 5 Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Morgan<br />
Taiwan & Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Molala<br />
Naganeng Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
<strong>14</strong> Matlalalehwele Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
re<br />
Bloempoort Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Masakaneng Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Masoing Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
15 Holneck Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Vlaklaagte Rural 19 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Maraganeng Rural 15 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Keerom 1 & 2 Rural 16 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
600 None
390<br />
DEVELOPMENT AREAS <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> FINANCIAL YEAR<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROJECT DURATION TOTAL<br />
EXPEND<br />
ITURE<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> WARD VILLAGE (AREA) SUBSID<br />
Y<br />
PROGR<br />
AMME<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />
FETAKGOMO MUNICIPALITY<br />
WARD AREAS<br />
S<br />
SUBSID<br />
Y<br />
BENEF<br />
ICIARI<br />
ES/HO<br />
USES<br />
Benefi<br />
ciaries/<br />
House<br />
s<br />
NONE<br />
MTEF<br />
ESTIMATES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>- 20<strong>14</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong> 15<br />
R’000 R’001<br />
CURRENT<br />
STATUS<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> 22 Phomola Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
mangaung Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
Posa Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project
391<br />
Makeke Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
3 Seroka Rural 40 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
Malekaskraal Rural 50 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
Mapoteng Rural 40 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
Ga-phasha Rural 40 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
5 Sekateng Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
Tjiebane/Komane/M<br />
akgaleng<br />
Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
Maroteng(Mohlalets<br />
e)<br />
Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
Ga-Tladi<br />
(Photo/Matotomale)<br />
Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
Bofala Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />
project<br />
TOTAL 310 None<br />
DEVELOPMENT AREAS <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> FINANCIAL YEAR<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROJECT DURATION TOTAL<br />
EXPEND<br />
ITURE<br />
MTEF<br />
ESTIMATES<br />
2012-13 <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
20<strong>14</strong>-<br />
15<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> WARD VILLAGE SUBSID BENEFICIA R’000 R’001<br />
CURRENT<br />
STATUS
392<br />
(AREA)<br />
Y<br />
PROGR<br />
AMME<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />
EPHRAIME MOGALE MUNICIPALITY<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> WARDS AREAS SUBSID<br />
Y<br />
RIES /<br />
HOUSES<br />
Beneficiari<br />
es/Houses<br />
1 Malebitsa Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
2 Spitspunt Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Uitvlught<br />
3 Matlala- a Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Ramoshebo<br />
4 Moganyaka Rural 184 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
5 Mmakgatle Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
6 Moomane Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
7 Marble hall Rural 66 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
TOTAL 400 None<br />
NONE
393<br />
DEVELOPMENT AREAS <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> FINANCIAL YEAR<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROJECT DURATION TOTAL<br />
EXPEND<br />
ITURE<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> WARD VILLAGE<br />
(AREA)<br />
SUBSID<br />
Y/<br />
PROGR<br />
AMME<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />
GREATER TUBATSE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> WARDS AREAS Rural/Ur<br />
ban<br />
BENEFICIA<br />
RIES/HOU<br />
SES<br />
Beneficiari<br />
es/Houses<br />
MTEF<br />
ESTIMATES<br />
2012-13 <strong>2013</strong>- 20<strong>14</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong> 15<br />
R’000 R’001<br />
NONE<br />
CURRENT<br />
STATUS<br />
Ward 1 Ga-Mabelane Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Mapareng Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
New Stand Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Makopung Rural 25 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Malaeneng Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Ohrigstad Rural - <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Makgalane Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Maepa Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Mantshibe Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project
394<br />
Banareng Rural 15 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Selahle Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Ward 2 Mapodile Rural 15 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Tukakgomo Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Matimatsatsi Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Mashagoseb Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
o<br />
Ga-Mawela Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Bobididi Rural - <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Garagopola Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Chrome Club Rural - <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Ward 3 Makgopa Rural 35 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Seefane Rural 45 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Maakgake Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Swale Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Marapong Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Malaeneng Rural 35 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Moshate Rural 35 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Motlamotse Rural 25 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Ditwebeleng Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Ward 4 Riba Cross Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Sections Rural 50 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
Morewane Rural 45 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project
395<br />
Mandela Rural 50 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
New Stand Rural 40 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />
TOTAL 0 825
396<br />
Project<br />
/Programme<br />
name<br />
Special<br />
Economic Zones<br />
Implementation<br />
Limpopo<br />
Business<br />
Registration Act<br />
Biodiversity<br />
scientific support<br />
services on<br />
biodiversity<br />
management<br />
Tisane Cultural<br />
Village ( Phaahla<br />
Eco-Tourism<br />
Projects<br />
2. LEDET<br />
Project /<br />
Programme<br />
description<br />
Establishment of<br />
Special Economic<br />
Zones to stimulate<br />
industrial activities<br />
and attract<br />
investment<br />
Capacitate<br />
municipalities<br />
Provide scientific<br />
support services on<br />
biodiversity<br />
management<br />
Development of a<br />
cultural village and a<br />
Nature reserve<br />
Local municipality/<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Project/programme<br />
duration<br />
Total budget<br />
Greater Tubatse Minimum of 5 years DTI to provide<br />
infrastructure and<br />
feasibility studies<br />
budget<br />
Local municipality Twelve months 139 000 139 000<br />
MTEF forward estimates<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/15 2015/16<br />
- - -<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 8 months 500 000 500 000 500 000 500 000<br />
Makhuduthamaga<br />
Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
<strong>2013</strong>-2016<br />
NDT funding the<br />
Project through SRI<br />
programme<br />
R20 m<br />
Safety Monitors<br />
Training and<br />
placement of 50<br />
Tourism Safety<br />
Monitors at strategic<br />
places for Tourism<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
<strong>Municipality</strong><br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> R19 m<br />
NDT funding the<br />
Project for<br />
R19 m
397<br />
Project<br />
/Programme<br />
name<br />
Project /<br />
Programme<br />
description<br />
purposes<br />
Local municipality/<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Project/programme<br />
duration<br />
Total budget<br />
Provinces.<br />
MTEF forward estimates<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/15 2015/16
398<br />
Project<br />
/Programme name<br />
Approve <strong>14</strong>5 home<br />
loans @ R300 000k<br />
per home loan<br />
3. LIMPOPO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (LEDA)<br />
Project /<br />
Programme<br />
description<br />
Grant loans to the<br />
value of R43.5m<br />
Local<br />
municipality/<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
All the <strong>District</strong><br />
Municipalities<br />
Project/programme<br />
duration<br />
Total budget<br />
<strong>2013</strong> - 16 R150m R43.5m<br />
R55,2m<br />
MTEF forward estimates<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/15 2015/16<br />
R50,8m<br />
Job Creation<br />
Job maintenance<br />
Khumong Chrome<br />
(Maandagshoek 5)<br />
Sefateng Chrome<br />
(Zwaartkoppies)<br />
Tshepong<br />
Chrome(Twyefelaar)<br />
PGM at ASA Metals<br />
Create 870 jobs<br />
Maintain 2175 jobs<br />
Chrome bankable<br />
feasibility study<br />
Chrome bulk<br />
sampling and<br />
feasibility study<br />
Chrome bankable<br />
feasibility study<br />
PGM dumps<br />
retreatment<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 20 years 4 500 m 1 500 m 2 000 m<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 10 years 500m 15 m 20 m 75 m<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 7 years 50m 1 m<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 5 years 50 m 20 m 30 m<br />
Public passenger<br />
Transport<br />
Providing public<br />
transportation to<br />
commuters<br />
All districts in<br />
Limpopo<br />
The programme<br />
runs on a daily basis<br />
R584m<br />
R680m<br />
R806m<br />
R749m
399<br />
Project<br />
/Programme<br />
name<br />
10 Prioritized<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Development for<br />
Provincial Nature<br />
Reserves (<br />
Lekgalameetse ,<br />
Makuya,<br />
Doorndraai Dam,<br />
N’wanedi ,<br />
Nylsvley, Rust De<br />
Winter, D’nyala,<br />
Letaba Ranch,<br />
Makapan Valley<br />
World Heritage<br />
Site, Schuinsdraai<br />
Dam or Blouberg.)<br />
4. LIMPOPO TOURISM AUTHORITY (LTA)<br />
Project /<br />
Programme<br />
description<br />
LTA to<br />
implement<br />
Reserves<br />
infrastructure<br />
Programme to<br />
maintain,<br />
upgrade and<br />
develop<br />
infrastructure<br />
on prioritized<br />
Provincial<br />
Nature<br />
Reserves as<br />
per attached<br />
Project Plan,<br />
Local municipality/<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Project/programme<br />
duration<br />
The whole Province <strong>2013</strong>/2016<br />
LTA to manage the<br />
Funds as per<br />
Project Plan<br />
Total budget<br />
R60 m<br />
MTEF forward estimates<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/15 2015/16
400<br />
PROJECT<br />
NAME<br />
PROGR<br />
AMME<br />
NAME<br />
PROJECT<br />
DESCRIPT<br />
ION/ TYPE<br />
OF<br />
STRUCTU<br />
RE<br />
5. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT<br />
PROGR<br />
AMME<br />
DESCRI<br />
PTION<br />
DISTRICT<br />
MUNICIPALI<br />
TY<br />
LOCAL<br />
MUNICIP<br />
ALITY<br />
PROJECT/PROGRAMME<br />
DURATION<br />
TOTAL<br />
BUDGE<br />
T R’000<br />
EXPENDI<br />
TURE TO<br />
DATE<br />
FROM<br />
PREVIOU<br />
S YEARS<br />
R’000<br />
MTEF FORWARD<br />
ESTIMATES R’000<br />
CURREN<br />
T<br />
STATUS<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
VEP<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
Office<br />
Accommodatio<br />
n<br />
Progra<br />
m 1<br />
Progra<br />
m 1<br />
VEP<br />
Office<br />
Accommo<br />
dation<br />
Admini<br />
stration<br />
Admini<br />
stration<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e<br />
Makhudu<br />
thamaga<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Date: Start<br />
Date:<br />
Finish<br />
MTEF<br />
2012/13<br />
MTEF<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/1<br />
4<br />
MTEF<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
01/04/2015 20/05/2016 <strong>23</strong> 336 0 0 3 160 Planning<br />
01/05/2015 30/10/2015 13 420 0 500 11 672 Planning
401<br />
6. EDUCATION<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Apel Circuit<br />
Office<br />
Asiphumelel<br />
e Special<br />
School<br />
Baphadima<br />
Secondary<br />
Batau<br />
Secondary<br />
Bokoni<br />
Primary<br />
School<br />
Bopedi Ba<br />
Pedi<br />
Secondary<br />
Dimo<br />
Secondary<br />
Diphale<br />
Secondary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Administration<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Fetakgom<br />
o<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
Education<br />
Office<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
01 April<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2015<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R 1<br />
500<br />
R 10<br />
843<br />
R 1<br />
200<br />
R 4<br />
175<br />
R<br />
500<br />
R 10<br />
500<br />
R 8<br />
075<br />
R 9<br />
975<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
R<br />
375<br />
R<br />
500<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
500<br />
R 5<br />
343<br />
R<br />
500<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
200<br />
R 0<br />
R 3<br />
075<br />
R 0 R 5<br />
500<br />
R 0<br />
R 10<br />
000<br />
R 2<br />
000
402<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Driekop<br />
Secondary<br />
ELIAS<br />
MASANGO<br />
PRIMARY<br />
Flag-<br />
Boshielo<br />
primary<br />
Glen Cowie<br />
Secondary<br />
Hlogotlou<br />
Circuit<br />
Ikageng<br />
Primary<br />
Ikhwezi<br />
Lokusa<br />
Primary<br />
Itirele<br />
Primary<br />
School<br />
(Original<br />
School Not<br />
Offshooot)<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Administration<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Education<br />
Office<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Specialise<br />
d<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
infrastructure<br />
Asset<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Rehabilitatio<br />
n,<br />
Renovations<br />
or<br />
Refurbishme<br />
nt<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Renovations,<br />
Rehabilitation or<br />
Refurbishments<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 9<br />
558<br />
R 8<br />
155<br />
R 2<br />
000<br />
R 11<br />
300<br />
R 6<br />
445<br />
R 9<br />
504<br />
R 12<br />
842<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
380<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0 R 0<br />
R 9<br />
102<br />
R 0 R 0 R 4<br />
155<br />
R 4<br />
741<br />
R<br />
836<br />
R 3<br />
508<br />
R 5<br />
300<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 2<br />
000
403<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Itsoseng<br />
Primary<br />
Itsoseng<br />
Primary<br />
Jacob Langa<br />
L/Primary<br />
Jacob<br />
Sefako<br />
Secondary<br />
Jafta Primary<br />
(Merging<br />
Schools)<br />
Jane Furse<br />
Special<br />
Primary<br />
School<br />
Kenneth<br />
Masekela<br />
Primary<br />
Kgahlanong<br />
Secondary<br />
School<br />
Kgaladi<br />
Primary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makh<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Specialise<br />
d<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Technical<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
ELSEN<br />
schools 2<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Recapitalisat<br />
ion of<br />
Technical<br />
Secondary<br />
schools<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Maintenance and Repairs <strong>2013</strong>/0<br />
4/01<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2015<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
2016/03<br />
/31<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R 5<br />
782<br />
R 6<br />
107<br />
R<br />
491<br />
R 41<br />
300<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R 8<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
100<br />
R 12<br />
398<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
104<br />
R 4<br />
300<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0 R 0 R<br />
491<br />
R 7<br />
047<br />
R 6<br />
000<br />
R<br />
585<br />
R 6<br />
519<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 2<br />
000<br />
R 0<br />
R 5<br />
289<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R<br />
590
404<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Kgarathutu<br />
Primary<br />
Kgokodibeng<br />
Secondary<br />
Kgotlopong<br />
Primary<br />
Kgotswane<br />
Secondary<br />
Kopa<br />
Secondary<br />
Kwata<br />
Primary<br />
Lamola<br />
Secondary<br />
Leboeng<br />
Primary<br />
Leboeng<br />
primary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
infrastructure<br />
Asset<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Renovations,<br />
Rehabilitatio<br />
n or<br />
Refurbishme<br />
nts<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01-<br />
May-12<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Renovations,<br />
Rehabilitation or<br />
Refurbishments<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
2015/03<br />
/31<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 3<br />
500<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 3<br />
500<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
380 380 R<br />
0.00<br />
R 8<br />
395<br />
R 10<br />
500<br />
R 4<br />
920<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 5<br />
500<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
R 5<br />
500<br />
R 6<br />
765<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 1<br />
<strong>23</strong>0<br />
R 4<br />
920<br />
R<br />
380
405<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Legare<br />
Secondary<br />
Lehlabile<br />
Secondary<br />
Lehwelere<br />
High<br />
Lekala<br />
secondary<br />
Lesailane<br />
Secondary<br />
Leshalabe<br />
Primary<br />
Lobethal<br />
Primary<br />
Luckau<br />
Primary<br />
Magale<br />
Secondary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
infrastructure<br />
Asset<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2015<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R 8<br />
715<br />
R 4<br />
600<br />
R 3<br />
200<br />
R 7<br />
622<br />
R 3<br />
000<br />
R<br />
500<br />
R 1<br />
000<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 3<br />
285<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 5<br />
500<br />
R 4<br />
600<br />
R 3<br />
200<br />
R 2<br />
300<br />
R 3<br />
000<br />
R<br />
500<br />
R 1<br />
000<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 3<br />
285<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 2<br />
800<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)
406<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Mahlaba<br />
Secondary<br />
MAHLAGAU<br />
ME<br />
PRIMARY<br />
Mahlare<br />
Secondary<br />
Makeke<br />
Primary<br />
Makeke<br />
primary<br />
Makofane<br />
Primary<br />
MAKOPI<br />
SECONDAR<br />
Y<br />
Makuane<br />
Secondary<br />
Makwe<br />
secondary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
infrastructure<br />
Asset<br />
Renovations,<br />
Rehabilitatio<br />
n or<br />
Refurbishme<br />
nts<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Maintenance<br />
and repairs<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
Renovations,<br />
Rehabilitation or<br />
Refurbishments<br />
01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01-<br />
May-13<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2015<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
2015/03<br />
/31<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R 6<br />
000<br />
R 2<br />
400<br />
R 9<br />
765<br />
R 8<br />
600<br />
R 8<br />
190<br />
R<br />
500<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 4<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
200<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
500<br />
R 2<br />
400<br />
R 3<br />
500<br />
R 4<br />
440<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
R<br />
500<br />
R 4<br />
000<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 5<br />
800<br />
R 0<br />
R 2<br />
800<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
200
407<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Makwe<br />
Secondary<br />
Makwetle<br />
secondary<br />
Makwetle<br />
Secondary<br />
Malengine<br />
Secondary<br />
Mamakgatla<br />
pe primary<br />
Mampana<br />
primary<br />
Mang – le –<br />
Mang<br />
Secondary<br />
MANNYETH<br />
A PRIMARY<br />
Manoke<br />
Secondary<br />
Manotong<br />
Primary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Fetakgom<br />
o<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 3<br />
200<br />
R 9<br />
963<br />
R 9<br />
969<br />
R 1<br />
200<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R<br />
450<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 3<br />
200<br />
R 5<br />
500<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 9<br />
963<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
200<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R<br />
450
408<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Manotwane<br />
Primary<br />
Mapiti<br />
Primary<br />
Mapogo<br />
Primary<br />
Marei<br />
Primary<br />
Maserumule<br />
High<br />
Masha<br />
Primary<br />
Mashakwane<br />
ng<br />
Secondary<br />
Mashile<br />
Primary<br />
Mashung<br />
Primary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
infrastructure<br />
Asset<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01-<br />
May-12<br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
2015/03<br />
/31<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R 8<br />
524<br />
R 3<br />
299<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 8<br />
118<br />
R 0 R 3<br />
299<br />
900 0 R<br />
900<br />
R 8<br />
925<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 1<br />
200<br />
R 7<br />
841<br />
R<br />
800<br />
R 5<br />
500<br />
R 3<br />
000<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
200<br />
R 0<br />
R 7<br />
841<br />
R<br />
800
409<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Mashwele<br />
Primary<br />
(Katlegong<br />
Vleerschboo<br />
m)<br />
Matailane<br />
High<br />
Matailane<br />
Secondary<br />
Matatadiben<br />
g Primary<br />
Mathibeng<br />
Primary<br />
Mathume<br />
Secondary<br />
Matime<br />
Primary<br />
Matlala<br />
Primary<br />
Matlala<br />
Primary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Fetakgom<br />
o<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
sekhuk<br />
hune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
infrastructure<br />
Asset<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
infrastructure<br />
Asset<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions <strong>2013</strong>/0<br />
4/01<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
2016/03<br />
/31<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R 3<br />
299<br />
R 4<br />
200<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 5<br />
050<br />
R 10<br />
500<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 10<br />
487<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
600<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 5<br />
400<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0 R 3<br />
299<br />
R 0<br />
R 1<br />
000<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 4<br />
200<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 5<br />
050<br />
R 4<br />
100<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 9<br />
987<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
600
410<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Matsebong<br />
Secondary<br />
Matshumane<br />
Secondary<br />
Matsitsi<br />
Primary<br />
Mmathabeng<br />
Primary<br />
Mmutlane<br />
Secondary<br />
Mninwa<br />
Mahlangu<br />
Primary<br />
Modipa<br />
Secondary<br />
Mogalatsane<br />
Primary<br />
Mogale wa<br />
bagale<br />
Technical<br />
High School<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Fetakgom<br />
o<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Technical<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Recapitalisat<br />
ion of<br />
Technical<br />
schools<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R 3<br />
299<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 3<br />
299<br />
R 1<br />
800<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 3<br />
299<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 1<br />
800<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R 0 R 3<br />
299<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 3<br />
299<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 0 R 3<br />
299
411<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Moganetswa<br />
primary<br />
Mogohlwane<br />
secondary<br />
Mogohlwane<br />
Secondary<br />
Mogolo<br />
Secondary<br />
Mohloping<br />
Primary<br />
Mokgeretli<br />
secondary<br />
Mokgeretli<br />
Secondary<br />
Mokgoba<br />
Primary<br />
Mokgubi<br />
Secondary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Rehabilitatio<br />
n,<br />
Renovations<br />
or<br />
Refurbishme<br />
nt<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Renovations,<br />
Rehabilitation or<br />
Refurbishments<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2011<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2011<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2015<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 3<br />
299<br />
R 15<br />
773<br />
R 9<br />
100<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 7<br />
000<br />
R 6<br />
589<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 0 R 3<br />
299<br />
R 4<br />
920<br />
R 2<br />
511<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 3<br />
075<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380
412<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Mokoeneam<br />
abula<br />
Secondary<br />
Moloke<br />
Combined<br />
(Split<br />
secondary<br />
from primary<br />
section)<br />
Moreri<br />
Choenyane<br />
secondary<br />
Moretlwe<br />
Secondary<br />
Moripane<br />
Primary<br />
Moriti High<br />
Moshiane<br />
Primary<br />
Moteane<br />
secondary<br />
Mothibedi<br />
Combined<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Fetakgom<br />
o<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Fetakgom<br />
o<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Fetakgom<br />
o<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Combined<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
Infrastructur<br />
e Asset<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R 2<br />
900<br />
R 1<br />
200<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
300<br />
R 9<br />
396<br />
R<br />
450<br />
R 10<br />
720<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
2900<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
200<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 4<br />
636<br />
R 0<br />
R 6<br />
519<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
300<br />
R 4<br />
312<br />
R<br />
450<br />
R 3<br />
690
413<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Motjedi High<br />
Motjere<br />
Secondary<br />
Motloulela<br />
Secondary<br />
Motsatsana<br />
Primary<br />
Motsepe<br />
Primary<br />
Mpelegeng<br />
Primary<br />
(Upgrade<br />
school from<br />
Grade R -<br />
Grade 7)<br />
Mphage<br />
Secondary<br />
Mpilo<br />
Secondary<br />
Nape-A-<br />
Ngoato High<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
Infrastructur<br />
e Asset<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R 1<br />
200<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R 3<br />
299<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R 1<br />
200<br />
R<br />
380<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
200<br />
R 0<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R 0 R 3<br />
299<br />
R 0<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
200<br />
R 0<br />
R<br />
380
4<strong>14</strong><br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Nareng<br />
Secondary<br />
Ngwanabeka<br />
ne Primary<br />
Ngwanangw<br />
ato High<br />
Ngwanasena<br />
na Primary<br />
Ngwanatshw<br />
ane<br />
Secondary<br />
Njinga<br />
Sindane<br />
Primary<br />
Nkoana<br />
William<br />
Maditsi<br />
Primary<br />
Nkotwane<br />
Secondary<br />
Ntabane<br />
Secondary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions <strong>2013</strong>/0<br />
4/01<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 2012/0<br />
5/01<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
2016/03<br />
/31<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
2016/03<br />
/31<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R 9<br />
135<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 10<br />
395<br />
R 12<br />
657<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 3<br />
100<br />
R 3<br />
500<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 3<br />
600<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 6<br />
400<br />
R 7<br />
872<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R 2<br />
000<br />
R<br />
900<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
495<br />
R 4<br />
182
415<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Ntshebele<br />
Secondary<br />
Ntshitshimal<br />
e Primary<br />
Nyaane<br />
Primary<br />
Or Tambo<br />
Comprehens<br />
ive<br />
Paapa<br />
Primary<br />
Paepae<br />
Secondary<br />
Paledi<br />
Primary<br />
Pataneng<br />
Primary<br />
Patantshwan<br />
a Primary<br />
Phatametsan<br />
e Secondary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R 1<br />
374<br />
R 1<br />
200<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 9<br />
041<br />
R 1<br />
200<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 8<br />
250<br />
R<br />
380<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 4<br />
100<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
374<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
200<br />
R 0<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 8<br />
610<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
200<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380
416<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Phetameetsa<br />
na<br />
Secondary<br />
Phoko<br />
Primary<br />
Photohlogoa<br />
na Primary<br />
Phukubjane<br />
Primary<br />
Ponti<br />
Secondary<br />
Potlake<br />
Secondary<br />
Potlake<br />
Secondary<br />
Pulane High<br />
Ramphelane<br />
High<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
Infrastructur<br />
e Asset<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2015<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2015<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R 9<br />
030<br />
R 4<br />
500<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 2<br />
000<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 10<br />
290<br />
R 6<br />
000<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 3<br />
285<br />
R 4<br />
000<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 6<br />
100<br />
R 1<br />
215<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 4<br />
500<br />
R 2<br />
000<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 2<br />
500<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 2<br />
000<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R 2<br />
700
417<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Rekhuditse<br />
Secondary<br />
Riba Primary<br />
Rootse<br />
Primary<br />
Sanitation<br />
Projects<br />
Sebjaneng<br />
Primary<br />
(Dinaletsana<br />
for<br />
Matshumane<br />
)<br />
Sedikwe<br />
Primary<br />
Seetseng<br />
Primary<br />
Sejadipudi<br />
Primary<br />
Sekale<br />
Primary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Various<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Variou<br />
s<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
Infrastructur<br />
e Asset<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Schools Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Renovations,<br />
Rehabilitatio<br />
n or<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Renovations,<br />
Rehabilitation or<br />
Refurbishments<br />
01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R<br />
750<br />
R 1<br />
500<br />
R 10<br />
332<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 5<br />
361<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
300<br />
R 10<br />
074<br />
R 4<br />
500<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
750<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
500<br />
R 6<br />
765<br />
R 0<br />
R 3<br />
075<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 0 R 5<br />
361<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R 0 R 0 R<br />
300<br />
R 4<br />
500<br />
R 6<br />
642<br />
R 3<br />
075
418<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Refurbishme<br />
nts<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
schools<br />
(Closeout of<br />
projects)<br />
Sekwati<br />
Primary<br />
Sekwati<br />
Secondary<br />
(Created by<br />
splitting<br />
Sango<br />
Primary)<br />
Selatole<br />
Primary<br />
Selebalo<br />
Secondary<br />
Semashego<br />
Primary<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Greater<br />
Sekhukhu<br />
ne <strong>District</strong><br />
Municipali<br />
ty<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Technical<br />
Assistance<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
Infrastructur<br />
e Asset<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
Infrastructur<br />
e Asset<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Rehabilitatio<br />
n,<br />
Renovations<br />
or<br />
Refurbishme<br />
nt<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Renovations,<br />
Rehabilitation or<br />
Refurbishments<br />
01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
R 9<br />
320<br />
R 6<br />
825<br />
R 6<br />
150<br />
R 5<br />
880<br />
R 7<br />
104<br />
R 9<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
320<br />
R 1<br />
000<br />
R 4<br />
500<br />
R 4<br />
300<br />
R 0<br />
R 2<br />
000<br />
R 6<br />
150<br />
R 1<br />
580<br />
R 6<br />
765
419<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Semoriri<br />
secondary<br />
Semoriri<br />
Secondary<br />
Seroletshidi<br />
Secondary<br />
Shorwane<br />
Secondary<br />
Sisabonga<br />
Primary<br />
Slovo Park<br />
Primary<br />
Sogane<br />
Secondary<br />
ST Paul<br />
Secondary<br />
Storm<br />
Damaged<br />
Schools<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Various<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Variou<br />
s<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Rehabilitatio<br />
n,<br />
Renovations<br />
or<br />
Refurbishme<br />
nt<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Renovations,<br />
Rehabilitation or<br />
Refurbishments<br />
01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Schools Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 11<br />
685<br />
R<br />
675<br />
R 3<br />
617<br />
R 1<br />
500<br />
R 3<br />
299<br />
R 3<br />
300<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
900<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 7<br />
380<br />
R<br />
675<br />
R 3<br />
444<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
500<br />
R 0 R 3<br />
299<br />
R 0<br />
R 3<br />
300<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R<br />
900
420<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Tagane<br />
Primary<br />
Tantanyane<br />
Primary<br />
Tautlou<br />
Primary<br />
Teleki<br />
Primary<br />
Thabampshe<br />
Primary<br />
Thabisong<br />
Primary<br />
Thabong<br />
Primary<br />
Tiitsane<br />
Primary<br />
Tlou Matlala<br />
Sec<br />
Tlouphuti<br />
Secondary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
ED<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R 10<br />
503<br />
R 1<br />
700<br />
R 6<br />
409<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 1<br />
200<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 6<br />
845<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 2<br />
400<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
200<br />
R 6<br />
409<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 10<br />
002<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 0 R 1<br />
200<br />
R 0<br />
R 0<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 6<br />
519<br />
R<br />
600<br />
R 2<br />
400
421<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Toilet<br />
Maintenance<br />
- Various<br />
Schools<br />
Tshege<br />
Secondary<br />
Tshehlwane<br />
ng<br />
Secondary<br />
Tshwaane<br />
Primary<br />
Tshweele<br />
Primary<br />
Tshweele<br />
Primary<br />
Tsoatago<br />
Primary<br />
Tumishi<br />
Primary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Various<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Makhudut<br />
hamaga<br />
Ephriam<br />
Mogale<br />
Fetakgom<br />
o<br />
Fetakgom<br />
o<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
All<br />
district<br />
s<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Riba<br />
Cross<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
School -<br />
Primary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
Maintenance<br />
and Repairs<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
New or<br />
Replaced<br />
Infrastructur<br />
e Asset<br />
Rehabilitatio<br />
n,<br />
Renovations<br />
or<br />
Refurbishme<br />
nt<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
New or Replaced<br />
Infrastructure Asset<br />
Renovations,<br />
Rehabilitation or<br />
Refurbishments<br />
01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
2015<br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
31<br />
March<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R<br />
150<br />
R 10<br />
552<br />
R 9<br />
917<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
R 5<br />
400<br />
R 3<br />
600<br />
R 2<br />
750<br />
R 4<br />
500<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 3<br />
000<br />
R 6<br />
279<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
R 5<br />
400<br />
R 3<br />
600<br />
R 2<br />
750<br />
R 4<br />
500<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 2<br />
500<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
150
422<br />
Project<br />
name<br />
Yigugulethu<br />
Primary<br />
Budget<br />
Program Name<br />
Public Ordinary<br />
School<br />
Education<br />
Municipa<br />
lity Name<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoale<br />
di<br />
Distric<br />
t<br />
Munici<br />
pality<br />
Name<br />
Sekhu<br />
khune<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastruct<br />
ure<br />
School -<br />
Secondary<br />
Type of<br />
Infrastructu<br />
re<br />
Upgrade and<br />
Additions<br />
BAS Alignment<br />
Target<br />
Start<br />
Date<br />
Upgrade and Additions 01<br />
April<br />
2015<br />
Target<br />
Comple<br />
tion<br />
Date<br />
31<br />
March<br />
2016<br />
Source of<br />
funding<br />
Education<br />
Infrastructure<br />
Grant<br />
Total<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
Cost<br />
R<br />
380<br />
MTE<br />
F 2<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
MTE<br />
F 3<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/<br />
15<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R 0<br />
MTE<br />
F 4<br />
2015/<br />
16<br />
(R'00<br />
0)<br />
R<br />
380<br />
R<br />
739<br />
612<br />
R<br />
211<br />
373<br />
R<br />
1<strong>23</strong><br />
352<br />
R<br />
258<br />
863<br />
1160<br />
412
4<strong>23</strong><br />
7. AGRICULTURE<br />
a. LDA Infrastructure proposed projects for <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
LDA Infrastructure proposed projects for <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
Project names Municipalities Project description Estimated budget<br />
Kopano Disable Ephraim Mogale Payment of retention for installed<br />
<strong>23</strong>6 736<br />
irrigation systems<br />
Rahlagane Ephraim Mogale Construction of Packhouse 500 000<br />
Matabane Elias Motsoaledi Tunnels 1 500 000<br />
Phasudi a Phohungwana Fetakgomo Planning of Irrigation system 1 250 000<br />
Makhuduthamaga Tomato Makhuduthamaga<br />
Planning of Irrigation systems for<br />
1 500 000<br />
Growers Phase 2<br />
four farmers<br />
Kalokanang Ephraim Mogale Planning of irrigation system 1 250 000<br />
Bapedi Fetakgomo Planning 30ha irrigation 1 300 000<br />
SAADC Ephraim Mogale Planning 38ha irrigation 2 300 000<br />
Malete Elias Motsoaledi Upgrade of Piggery structure 506 000<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> SI Tubatse Construction of 50 Sower Unit<br />
2 430 000<br />
Piggery Unit<br />
JDP Piggery Tubatse Construction of 50 Sower Unit<br />
2 500 000<br />
Piggery Unit<br />
Mpshe Egg- laying project Elias Motsoaledi Construction of poultry house and<br />
250 000<br />
accessories<br />
Beutitute ECPH Elias Motsoaledi Construction of ECPH 6 000 000<br />
Thulane Dairy Elias Motsoaledi Completion of layer units 300 000<br />
Tompi Seleka Piggery Ephraim Mogale Completion of 16 sow unit 4 500 000<br />
Krokodilheuwel dam Makhuduthamaga Dam safety repairs 600 000<br />
Hereford Bulk water supply Elias Motsoaledi Bulk water system upgrade 8 000 000<br />
Tompi Seleka irrigation Marble Hall In-field irrigation upgrade 1 800 000
424<br />
LDA Infrastructure proposed projects for <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
Project names Municipalities Project description Estimated budget<br />
Tompi Seleka Bio-diesel Marble Hall Bio-diesel Processing project 8 000 000<br />
Krokodilheuwel Irrigation Makhuduthamaga In-field irrigation upgrade 2 900 000<br />
Setlaboswane Irrigation Makhuduthamaga In-field irrigation upgrade 2 200 000<br />
Phetwane Irrigation Marble Hall In-field irrigation upgrade 300 000<br />
Mogalatsane Irrigation Marble Hall In-field irrigation upgrade 1 500 000<br />
Planning & Design Fees All Planning and design of schemes for 10 000 000<br />
future projects<br />
Construction supervision All Construction Supervision for projects<br />
under implementation<br />
5 000 000<br />
b. Land Care Projects <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong>: Conditional Grant<br />
PROJECT NAMES MUNICIPALITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION<br />
ESTIMATED<br />
BUDGET<br />
Leolo Tubatse Soil conservation R 800 000.00<br />
Fetakgomo Fetakgomo Soil conservation R 800 000.00<br />
Makhuduthamaga Makhuduthamaga Veld management R 850 000.00<br />
Moutse East Elias Motsoaledi Veld management R 800 000.00<br />
Moutse West Ephraim Mogale Alien plant control R 942 500.00
425<br />
8. Department of Roads and Transport<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> Type of infrastructure Project duration Source of funding<br />
Date: Start Date: Finish<br />
Makhuduthamaga Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
Elias Motsoaledi Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
Elias Motsoaledi Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
Elias Motsoaledi Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
Ephraim Mohale Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
Ephraim Mohale Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
Elias Motsoaledi Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
Elias Motsoaledi Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
Makhuduthamaga Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
Makhuduthamaga Upgrading of access roads 01/08/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
Makhuduthamaga Upgrading of access roads 01/08/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
Fetakgomo Household based routine<br />
road maintenance<br />
Elias Motsoaledi Household based routine<br />
road maintenance<br />
Makhuduthamaga Household based routine<br />
road maintenance<br />
01/09/<strong>2013</strong> 30/08/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
01/11/<strong>2013</strong> 31/10/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
01/10/<strong>2013</strong> 31/09/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant
426<br />
Ephraim Mogale<br />
Greater Tubatse<br />
Household based routine<br />
road maintenance<br />
Household based routine<br />
road maintenance<br />
01/09/<strong>2013</strong> 30/08/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
01/09/<strong>2013</strong> 30/08/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />
9. Department of Sports, Art and Culture<br />
PROJECT<br />
NAME<br />
PROGRAMM<br />
E NAME<br />
PROJECT<br />
DESCRIPTION/<br />
TYPE OF<br />
STRUCTURE<br />
PROGR<br />
AMME<br />
DESCRI<br />
PTION<br />
DISTRIC<br />
T<br />
MUNICIP<br />
ALITY<br />
LOCAL<br />
MUNICIPALIT<br />
Y<br />
PROJECT/PROGR<br />
AMME DURATION<br />
TOTA<br />
L<br />
BUDG<br />
ET<br />
EXPENDI<br />
TURE TO<br />
DATE<br />
FROM<br />
PREVIOU<br />
S YEAR<br />
MTEF FORWARD<br />
ESTIMATES<br />
CUR<br />
REN<br />
T<br />
STAT<br />
US<br />
DATE<br />
START<br />
DATE<br />
FINISH<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> <strong>2013</strong>/.20<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
Construction of<br />
Phokwane<br />
library<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Construction of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e DM<br />
Makhuduthamag<br />
a<br />
0 R8,000, 000 0<br />
Upgrading of<br />
Marble Hall<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Upgrading of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e DM<br />
Marble Hall 0 R500,000 0
427<br />
PROJECT<br />
NAME<br />
PROGRAMM<br />
E NAME<br />
PROJECT<br />
DESCRIPTION/<br />
TYPE OF<br />
STRUCTURE<br />
PROGR<br />
AMME<br />
DESCRI<br />
PTION<br />
DISTRIC<br />
T<br />
MUNICIP<br />
ALITY<br />
LOCAL<br />
MUNICIPALIT<br />
Y<br />
PROJECT/PROGR<br />
AMME DURATION<br />
TOTA<br />
L<br />
BUDG<br />
ET<br />
EXPENDI<br />
TURE TO<br />
DATE<br />
FROM<br />
PREVIOU<br />
S YEAR<br />
MTEF FORWARD<br />
ESTIMATES<br />
CUR<br />
REN<br />
T<br />
STAT<br />
US<br />
DATE<br />
START<br />
DATE<br />
FINISH<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> <strong>2013</strong>/.20<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
Upgrading of<br />
Ohrigstad<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Upgrading of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e DM<br />
Greater Tubatse 0 0 R500,000<br />
Upgrading of<br />
Atok library<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Upgrading of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e DM<br />
Fetakgomo 0 0 0<br />
Maintenance of<br />
Groblersdal<br />
library<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Maintenance of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e DM<br />
Elias Motsoaledi 0 R250, 000 0<br />
Maintenance of<br />
Jane Furse<br />
library<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Maintenance of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e DM<br />
Makhuduthamag<br />
a<br />
0 0 R250, 000
428<br />
PROJECT<br />
NAME<br />
PROGRAMM<br />
E NAME<br />
PROJECT<br />
DESCRIPTION/<br />
TYPE OF<br />
STRUCTURE<br />
PROGR<br />
AMME<br />
DESCRI<br />
PTION<br />
DISTRIC<br />
T<br />
MUNICIP<br />
ALITY<br />
LOCAL<br />
MUNICIPALIT<br />
Y<br />
PROJECT/PROGR<br />
AMME DURATION<br />
TOTA<br />
L<br />
BUDG<br />
ET<br />
EXPENDI<br />
TURE TO<br />
DATE<br />
FROM<br />
PREVIOU<br />
S YEAR<br />
MTEF FORWARD<br />
ESTIMATES<br />
CUR<br />
REN<br />
T<br />
STAT<br />
US<br />
DATE<br />
START<br />
DATE<br />
FINISH<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> <strong>2013</strong>/.20<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
Maintenance of<br />
Patantswane<br />
library<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Maintenance of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e DM<br />
Makhuduthamag<br />
a<br />
0 0 R250 ,000<br />
Maintenance of<br />
Tubatse/Burgers<br />
fort library<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Maintenance of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e DM<br />
Tubatse 0 0 R250, 000<br />
Maintenance of<br />
Roosenekal<br />
library<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Maintenance of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e D<br />
Makhuduthamag<br />
a<br />
0 0 R250 ,000<br />
Maintenance of<br />
Ga-Phaahla<br />
library<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Maintenance of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e DM<br />
Makhuduthamag<br />
a<br />
0 0 R250, 000
429<br />
PROJECT<br />
NAME<br />
PROGRAMM<br />
E NAME<br />
PROJECT<br />
DESCRIPTION/<br />
TYPE OF<br />
STRUCTURE<br />
PROGR<br />
AMME<br />
DESCRI<br />
PTION<br />
DISTRIC<br />
T<br />
MUNICIP<br />
ALITY<br />
LOCAL<br />
MUNICIPALIT<br />
Y<br />
PROJECT/PROGR<br />
AMME DURATION<br />
TOTA<br />
L<br />
BUDG<br />
ET<br />
EXPENDI<br />
TURE TO<br />
DATE<br />
FROM<br />
PREVIOU<br />
S YEAR<br />
MTEF FORWARD<br />
ESTIMATES<br />
CUR<br />
REN<br />
T<br />
STAT<br />
US<br />
DATE<br />
START<br />
DATE<br />
FINISH<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong> <strong>2013</strong>/.20<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
Maintenance of<br />
Fetakgomo<br />
library<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Maintenance of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e DM<br />
Fetakgomo 0 0 R250, 000<br />
Maintenance of<br />
Vlakfontein<br />
library<br />
Library and<br />
Archives<br />
Services<br />
Maintenance of<br />
library<br />
Sekhukhun<br />
e DM<br />
Makhuduthamag<br />
a<br />
0 0 R250, R250, 000
430<br />
10. ESKOM<br />
PROJECT NAME BUDGET<br />
YEAR<br />
Zenzele <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Kgobokwane/Kgaphamadi <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Legolaneng <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Mmakola <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Vaalbank <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Mmotwaneng <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Toitskraal Agrcicultural <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
Holding<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Rathoke <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Phetwane <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Spitspunt <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Driefontein <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Leeufontein (Mosongo) <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Malebitsa <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Makgatle A <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
FUNDI<br />
NG<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
DoE<br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
CODE & NAME<br />
LIM472 Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
LIM472 Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
LIM472 Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
LIM471 Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
LIM471 Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
LIM471 Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
LIM471 Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
LIM471 Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
LIM471 Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
LIM471 Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
LIM471 Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
LIM471 Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
LIM471 Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
LIM471 Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
DISTRICT<br />
COUNCIL<br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
PROVINCE PROJECT<br />
TYPE<br />
BUDGET (VAT INC) PLANNED<br />
CONNECTIONS<br />
LIMPOPO Household R1 930 500.00 <strong>14</strong>3<br />
LIMPOPO Household R2 025 000.00 150<br />
LIMPOPO Household R1 124 785.10 83<br />
LIMPOPO Household R8<strong>23</strong> 500.00 61<br />
LIMPOPO Household R440 000.00 20<br />
LIMPOPO Household R308 000.00 <strong>14</strong><br />
LIMPOPO Household R220 000.00 10<br />
LIMPOPO Household R1 282 500.00 95<br />
LIMPOPO Household R283 500.00 21<br />
LIMPOPO Household R351 000.00 26<br />
LIMPOPO Household R904 500.00 67<br />
LIMPOPO Household R1 065 460.00 60<br />
LIMPOPO Household R1 427 741.95 121<br />
LIMPOPO Household R1 847 <strong>23</strong>7.60 87
431<br />
PROJECT NAME<br />
Maisela/Mahlabaphoko,M<br />
apodi,Mapulaneng,Mashu<br />
ng &Nkwana<br />
Bogalatladi/Magololaneng<br />
& Sefateng<br />
Debeila/Mabopo,Magotwa<br />
neng,Mashung./Tlakale,M<br />
aswaneng,Mmashaku<br />
India(Ga Maisela),<br />
Malogeng, Malomanye<br />
Makgalane/banareng/mok<br />
upung<br />
BUDGET<br />
YEAR<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Mokutung <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Kgopaneng <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Maakubu <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Burgersfort ext <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Mamone Ph2 <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Greater Komane <strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
FUNDI<br />
NG<br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
CODE & NAME<br />
DISTRICT<br />
COUNCIL<br />
DoE LIM474 Fetakgomo DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DoE LIM474 Fetakgomo DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DoE LIM474 Fetakgomo DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DoE LIM474 Fetakgomo DC47 Greater<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DoE LIM475 Greater DC47 Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DoE LIM475 Greater DC47 Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DoE LIM475 Greater DC47 Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DoE LIM475 Greater DC47 Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DoE LIM475 Greater DC47 Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DoE LIM473<br />
DC47 Greater<br />
Makhuduthamaga <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
DoE LIM473<br />
DC47 Greater<br />
Makhuduthamaga <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
PROVINCE PROJECT<br />
TYPE<br />
BUDGET (VAT INC) PLANNED<br />
CONNECTIONS<br />
LIMPOPO Household R6 075 000.00 450<br />
LIMPOPO Household R2 227 500.00 165<br />
LIMPOPO Household R432 000.00 32<br />
LIMPOPO Household R3 569 257.83 251<br />
LIMPOPO Household R15 191 684.67 813<br />
LIMPOPO Household R3 529 890.00 221<br />
LIMPOPO Household R4 171 500.00 309<br />
LIMPOPO Household R7 222 500.00 535<br />
LIMPOPO Household R2 <strong>14</strong>6 500.00 159<br />
LIMPOPO Household R 3 780 000.00 280<br />
LIMPOPO Household R 4 104 000.00 304<br />
R66 483 557.15 4 477
432<br />
CHAPTER 6:<br />
INTEGRATION<br />
PHASE
433<br />
6.1. STATUS OF SECTOR PLANS<br />
Table 100: Policies/strategies<br />
POLICY/PLAN/STRATEGY STATUS DATE APPROVED<br />
Employment Equity Plan Adopted 2009<br />
Workplace Skills Plan Adopted 2009<br />
Retention Strategy Adopted 2009<br />
PMS Adopted 2009<br />
Human Resource Development Strategy Adopted 2005<br />
Institutional Plan Draft Not Adopted<br />
Spatial Development Framework Adopted 2004<br />
Integrated Waste Management System Adopted 2007<br />
HIV/AIDS Plan Adopted 2007<br />
Health Plan Adopted 2009<br />
LED Strategy Adopted 2007<br />
Revenue Enhancement Strategy Draft Not Adopted<br />
Risk Management Plan Draft Not Adopted<br />
5 Year Investment Plan Draft Not Adopted<br />
Communication Strategy Adopted 2005<br />
WSDP Adopted 2005<br />
Road Master Plan Adopted 2008<br />
Tourism Strategy Adopted 2005<br />
Water Master Plan Adopted 2007<br />
Financial Plan Adopted 2010<br />
Marketing Strategy Adopted 2009<br />
Community Participation Plan Adopted 2005<br />
Integrated Transport Plan Draft Not Adopted<br />
6.2. SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />
SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (SDF)<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> Spatial Development Framework was adopted in 2004<br />
and reviewed in 2008. In terms of the Municipal Systems Act, an SDF is a component of an<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>. The act requires that it be compiled to give effect to the <strong>IDP</strong>. It is a legal framework that is<br />
desired to implement an <strong>IDP</strong>. It sets out objectives that reflect the desired spatial form of the<br />
district.
434<br />
The spatial development framework guides and informs all decision of the municipality relating<br />
to land use development and land planning. It guides and informs the direction of growth, major<br />
movement routes, special development areas and conservation of areas by:<br />
• Indicating desired pattern of land use<br />
• Addressing the spatial reconstruction of the location and nature of development in the<br />
district.<br />
• Providing strategic guidance in respect of the location and nature of development in the<br />
district.<br />
• Indicating where public and private land development and infrastructure development<br />
should take place.<br />
• Indicating desired or undesired utilization of space in a particular area within the district.<br />
• Delineating urban edge.<br />
• Identifying areas where strategic intervention is required.<br />
• Indicating where priority spending is required from a district point of view/scale for<br />
municipal but for district wide projects.<br />
SDM has recently compiled a review of the SDF. The reviewed SDF is in place and has<br />
identified the following spatial development objectives and principles:<br />
• To actively protect, enhance and manage the natural environmental resources in<br />
the municipality in order to ensure a sustainable equilibrium between the mining,<br />
tourism and agricultural industries in the area.<br />
• To optimally capitalize on the strategic location of the <strong>District</strong> by way of<br />
strengthening internal and external linkages within provincial and regional<br />
context.<br />
• To utilize the natural environmental and cultural historic features in the <strong>District</strong> as<br />
anchors from which to promote ecotourism and conservation.<br />
• To maximally utilize the mining potential in the district by way of the development<br />
of the Dilokong Corridor.<br />
• To promote commercial farming and food production along the Olifants River and<br />
Steelpoort River drainage systems in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
• To facilitate small scale and subsistence farming activities throughout the<br />
remainder part of the municipal area.<br />
• To promote industrial/commercial development in the <strong>District</strong> with specific<br />
emphasis on agro-processing in the agricultural belt (Groblersdal), and<br />
mining/ore-processing in the mining belt (Tubatse).<br />
• To create a strong east-west movement/development corridor in the <strong>District</strong><br />
functionally linking the tourism precincts, mining belt and agricultural belt to one<br />
another, and to the markets of Gauteng Province along the Moloto Corridor.
435<br />
• To supplement the <strong>District</strong> east-west corridor by way of three functional northsouth<br />
corridors:<br />
- N11: Agriculture, Commerce<br />
- R583: Institutional, Residential<br />
- R33: Mining<br />
· To ensure equitable access to social infrastructure and to promote Local Economic<br />
Development by way of an evenly distributed range of Multi-Purpose Community<br />
Centres to be established throughout the <strong>District</strong>.<br />
• To consolidate the urban structure of the district around the highest order centres by<br />
way of infill development and densification in Strategic Development Areas.<br />
• To establish a functional hierarchy of towns and settlements in the <strong>District</strong> based on the<br />
regional function and spatial distribution of these centres.<br />
LAND USE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LUMS)<br />
Land use management system is a permutation of tools and mechanisms developed together in<br />
order to manage, control, influence and regulate the use of land. This system includes the <strong>IDP</strong><br />
with spatial development framework as its component that scales down to a land use scheme<br />
and ultimately to the building plans. LUMS are put in place to effect a uniform system and<br />
procedures for land development and land use management and addresses the plethora and<br />
imbalances of the past.<br />
SDM has initiated a LUMS project for its local municipalities. The draft LUMS are in place.<br />
Promulgation of the LUMS has been hampered by the delay in the promulgation of the national<br />
land use management bill that provides for regulation of land use management.<br />
STATUS OF LAND USE MANAGEMENT SCHEMES IN SDM<br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
Greater Tubatse LM<br />
Ephraim Mogale LM<br />
Elias Motsoaledi LM<br />
Fetakgomo LM<br />
Makhuduthamaga LM<br />
LAND USE SCHEME<br />
Draft Land Use Scheme; (Burgersford<br />
town planning Scheme ( adopted 2006))<br />
Draft Land Use Scheme<br />
Draft Land Use Scheme (Groblersdal<br />
Town planning Scheme (Adopted 2006))<br />
Draft Land Use Scheme<br />
Draft Land Use Scheme
436<br />
6.3. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
INTEGRATED TRANSPORT PLAN (ITP)<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> undertook a project to update the Integrated Transport<br />
Plan (ITP) for its area of jurisdiction, whereby the final draft report was completed in March<br />
2007. The report is still pending the Council approval. The ITP was prepared, as required in<br />
terms of section 27 of the National Land Transport Transition Act, No.22 of 2000 (NLTTA), as<br />
amended. The ITP attends to the public and private modes of transport, infrastructure, facilities<br />
and services. The Integrated Transport Plan constitutes a transport sector input into the <strong>IDP</strong><br />
process.<br />
For implementing the NLTTA, the Minister of Transport published the minimum requirements for<br />
the preparation of the ITP (Government Gazette No. R25245 dated 1 August 2003). This<br />
publication provides for the minimum requirements for the structure and contents of the ITP<br />
document.<br />
A data collection process preceded the ITP. The aim of that process was to gain an idea of the<br />
current situation in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) in terms of transportation utility.<br />
One of the data collection process is called the Current Public Transport Record (CPTR). The<br />
final updated CPTR report was completed in November 2006. This included surveys of taxi<br />
operations at taxi ranks.<br />
Subsequently, the Operating Licensing Strategy, Rationalization Plan and Public Transport Plan<br />
for the SDM were updated, and are components of the Integrated Transport Plan.<br />
Further research was done into road infrastructure development plans and operational plans,<br />
such as Road Safety, Travel Demand Management, freight and commodity flow data collection<br />
and demographic data. The ITP and Land Development Objectives should be complementary.<br />
The ITP indicates that SDM should focus its efforts and resources on the following strategic<br />
components of transportation:<br />
a) Capacity and Skills Development<br />
· Training of officials in integrated transportation planning and land-use planning<br />
· Recruitment of transport planners and engineers<br />
· Procurement of consulting engineering services for consistent and continuous advice<br />
and for undertaking ad hoc projects<br />
b) Addressing the Service Backlog
437<br />
· Motivate subsidized public transport coverage in the SDM with the objective of reducing<br />
the cost of travel<br />
· Install public transport infrastructure such as shelters, lay-bys and inter-modal facilities<br />
· Upgrade the road infrastructure and the streets between residential and business nodes,<br />
giving special attention to the Greater Tubatse Area.<br />
c) Travel Demand Management (TDM)<br />
· Manage congestion through TDM measures such as signalization, bus lanes, reversible<br />
lanes in urban areas and the upgrading of intersections<br />
· Develop a non-motorized transport plan and implement projects.<br />
d) Road Safety<br />
· Develop a Central Communications Centre for incident management<br />
· Perform road safety audits<br />
· Address hazardous locations<br />
· Motivate law enforcement at strategic locations<br />
e) Conduct Education and Communication Campaigns<br />
The way forward is to submit motivations for the prioritized projects in the Integrated Transport<br />
Plan (ITP) and the Integrated Development Plan (<strong>IDP</strong>). The construction and maintenance of<br />
public transport facilities and roads are in most cases labour-intensive, and are appropriate<br />
mechanisms to promote job creation.<br />
INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (IWMP)<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has developed the integrated Waste Management Plan<br />
that is waiting for approval by Council. The purpose of this Integrated Waste Management Plan<br />
(IWMP) is to enable <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> to progressively develop an Integrated Waste Management<br />
System (IWMS) capable of delivering waste management services to all households and<br />
businesses.<br />
Implementation requires that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> move away from traditional “end of pipe” solutions<br />
(the dominant practice in South Africa) that focus on waste after it has been generated:<br />
Collection – Transport – Land-filling.<br />
National policy requires municipalities to implement an IWMS where the focus is on prevention<br />
and minimization of waste, recycling of waste and treatment that is able to reduce the potential
438<br />
harmful impacts of waste. Only after these efforts, should remaining waste be disposed of at a<br />
landfill.<br />
Integrated Waste Management is based upon waste generators acting responsibly by<br />
separating their waste at source (the point of generation) and then properly recycling, storing<br />
and disposing of the different parts of the waste. Government must ensure that there is waste<br />
management service delivery system providing a network of collection and disposal options so<br />
that generators can effectively exercise their responsibilities. Thus, Integrated Waste<br />
Management combines personal responsibility with government service delivery. Appropriate<br />
education and training is required for everyone.<br />
A key element of the IWMS is home use of organic waste (composting or animal feed) as this<br />
eliminates the need for collection, transport, treatment and disposal of as much as 50% of the<br />
waste stream.<br />
Non-organic recyclable material, when separated at source has higher value, is more easily<br />
routed to end users and can be recovered at a far higher efficiency rate than when it is<br />
salvaged at a landfill site. In the IWMS will create new forms of safe employment with better<br />
remuneration while education and training enables salvagers to take advantage of new career<br />
path.<br />
Alternative solutions<br />
The Feasibility Study describes two options for the waste management system in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />
Only option 2 contains key elements for an IWMS. Option 1 presents a strategic with “end of<br />
pipe” services and shows the potential costs of waste management in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> without<br />
incorporating integrated strategies.<br />
An overview of all options is shown in the table 78 below.<br />
Table 101: Strategy Options<br />
Core elements Waste Management Strategy Integrated strategies<br />
Collection Transport Disposal Recycling Treatment
439<br />
Option 1 House to<br />
house<br />
service<br />
provided by<br />
the<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Operation of<br />
collecting<br />
points and<br />
transport with<br />
trucks and<br />
donkey cards<br />
(rural areas)<br />
provided by<br />
the<br />
<strong>Municipality</strong><br />
Rehabilitation<br />
and/or operation<br />
of 7 landfill sites<br />
according to<br />
DWAF’s MR<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
and closure of<br />
15 dumpsite<br />
On the<br />
landfills by<br />
private<br />
contractors<br />
No<br />
composting<br />
MBWT may<br />
be<br />
considered<br />
Overview of feasibility options<br />
These projects have two fundamental economic flaws:<br />
Income is derived from the sale of salvaged recyclables only. The value gained by the<br />
municipality in reduced land fill costs is not seen as linked to the project and the salvagers do<br />
not receive any portion of this value.<br />
In end of pipe salvaging, waste is first mixed at source and then transported by the municipality<br />
to the land fill where it then has to be separated and transported once again.<br />
The added costs significantly reduce the revenue available to the salvagers.<br />
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (IEMP)<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has drafted the Integrated Environmental Management<br />
Plan that is waiting to be approved by Council. The Integrated Environmental Management Plan<br />
(IEMP) is a plan with a holistic framework that can be embraced by all sectors of society for the<br />
assessment and management of environmental impacts and aspects associated with an activity<br />
for each stage of the active life cycle, taking into consideration a broad definition of environment<br />
and with the overall aim of promoting sustainable development.<br />
The founding principles of the IEMP are the following:<br />
· Integrated approach.<br />
· Informed decision making.<br />
· Holistic decision making<br />
· Alternative options.
440<br />
· Continual improvement.<br />
· Community empowerment.<br />
· Equity.<br />
· Accountability and responsibility.<br />
· Adaptation.<br />
· Dispute Resolution.<br />
· Global Responsibilities.<br />
· Environmental Justice.<br />
· Institutional Co-ordination.<br />
· Polluter Pays.<br />
This document is not yet approved by Council. To avoid long term accumulated negative effect,<br />
the <strong>District</strong> has started implementing some of the recommendations mentioned in the<br />
document. The plan is developed from the involvement of interested and affected parties as<br />
well as the responsible authority in ensuring the protection of its citizens while taking forward<br />
economic development. It should be emphasized that consultation with the other regulatory<br />
authority and sectors is pivotal in ensuring association with the plan for proper integration.<br />
The SDM <strong>IDP</strong>, Limpopo State of the Environment Report, Limpopo Employment, Growth and<br />
Development Plan (LEGDP) and the <strong>IDP</strong>s of the five Local municipalities (which are under the<br />
direct control of the <strong>District</strong>) provided the framework for the development of this three-year<br />
(2001-2010) Integrated Environmental Management Plan (IEMP).<br />
The development of this plan was based on the following protocol:<br />
- Identification of the environmental activities and priorities performed by sectors of the<br />
municipality and its five local municipalities.<br />
- Clustering of common functions.<br />
- Setting of goals and objectives.<br />
- Documentation of strategies.<br />
- Identification and development of the environmental programmes.<br />
- Development of projects.<br />
- Development of the management strategy for all the levels of the projects.<br />
- Identification of role players.<br />
This IEMP has set the basis upon which the development of the SDM environmental policy and<br />
the SDM State of Environmental Report is formulated. This policy will be important in guiding<br />
the other ecosystems plans.<br />
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (AQMP)
441<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) in line with the Department of Economic<br />
Development, Environment and Tourism in the Limpopo Province (LEDET) has developed a<br />
Draft Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the SDM.<br />
The overall goal with the Plan is to manage, reduce and/or eliminate the generation and<br />
significant negative environmental impact(s) of all known air pollutants in their area of<br />
jurisdiction.<br />
The AQMP will be used to reform the by-laws regulating air quality in order to protect the quality<br />
of the air in the SDM and to minimize the impact of air pollution emissions on neighbouring<br />
districts, yet allowing ecologically sustainable and justifiable economic and social development.<br />
By compiling an AQMP, the SDM will comply with the relevant requirements of the National<br />
Environmental Management Air Quality Act 39 of 2004.<br />
The object of the National Environmental Management Air Quality Act 39 of 2004 is;<br />
(A) To protect the environment by providing reasonable measures for –<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
(iii)<br />
(B)<br />
The protection and enhancement of the quality of air in the<br />
Republic;<br />
The prevention of air pollution and ecological degradation; and<br />
Securing ecologically sustainable development while promoting justifiable economic<br />
and social development; and<br />
Generally to give effect to Section 24(b) of the Constitution in order to enhance the<br />
quality of ambient air for the sake of securing an environment that is not harmful to the<br />
health and well-being of people.<br />
The specific objectives of generating this Plan are to:<br />
· Ensure the identification of significant air pollutants;<br />
· Control the emission of air pollutants;<br />
· Implement planned Air Quality Management strategies;<br />
· Achieve acceptable air quality levels throughout SDM;<br />
· Promote a clean and healthy environment for all citizens within SDM;<br />
· Minimize the negative impacts of air pollution on health and the environment; and<br />
· Promote the reduction of greenhouse gases so as to support the district's climate<br />
change protection programme.<br />
WATER SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLAN (WSDP)
442<br />
Residential consumers of water:<br />
· 42% of Rural consumer units are below the RDP standard;<br />
· 100% of Rural farmland units are estimated to be below the RDP standard;<br />
· Although no reliable information is available it is estimated that 90% of rural scattered<br />
and 2<br />
· 0% of rural dense consumer units are below the RDP standard.<br />
· Residential consumers of sanitation<br />
The following situation exists within rural areas:<br />
· Rural Dense: 40% below the RDP standard;<br />
· Rural Village: 75% below the RDP standard;<br />
· Rural Scattered: 90% below the RDP standard;<br />
· Rural Farmland: 95% below the RDP standard.<br />
Future trends and goals:<br />
· The goal of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> WSA is to provide everyone with an adequate and reliable<br />
supply of water and to manage the water supply services in an affordable, equitable and<br />
sustainable manner.<br />
· The target is that 30% of the RDP backlog in water supplies and 50% O and M<br />
deficiencies are to be eliminated by Dec 2008. 100% coverage should be achieved in<br />
2012.<br />
· The sanitation target is to eliminate 30% of the backlog by 2010, 50% by 2015 and<br />
100% by 2016.<br />
· VIP latrines (properly designed and constructed including fly-screens) will be the<br />
standard solution to sanitation for most consumers outside the defined Growth Points,<br />
including low cost housing schemes.<br />
· The RDP backlog and O and M deficiencies in water-borne sanitation systems are to be<br />
eliminated by Dec 2008 and on-site dry installations, VIP latrines, are to be provided to<br />
all households by Dec 2016.<br />
· On-site monitoring of Groundwater is to be instituted on all Groundwater Supply<br />
Schemes that have on-site sanitation by 2015.<br />
Strategic Gap Analysis<br />
· Monitoring of water supply quality is to be introduced on all schemes. Data to be<br />
collected on a Sub-Scheme basis. Little or no data is currently available.
443<br />
· Ground water quality is to be implemented on all groundwater schemes where there is<br />
on-site sanitation (dry or wet). No data is currently available.<br />
· Lack of a single data base for water schemes.<br />
· Groundwater data being held up due to non – submission of GRIP data base.<br />
· Transfer of Schemes and ex. DWAF staff to WSA and local Wasps is proving to be<br />
problematic, due in part to an oversupply of unskilled operational personnel on the one<br />
hand and a shortage of skilled personnel, engineers, technicians and scientists on the<br />
other.<br />
· Shortage of engineers and technicians to design, implement, manage, monitor and<br />
evaluate schemes.<br />
Implementation Strategy<br />
· An O and M budget allocation for on-going refurbishment and defective and badly<br />
maintained infrastructure has been allowed.<br />
· Focus will be placed on labour-intensive construction methods for refurbishment,<br />
maintenance and water supply projects.<br />
· A water demand management programme is to be initiated.<br />
· The sanitation programme to be increased to meet the sanitation targets of 13 068 units<br />
per year.<br />
· Abstraction rates and water quality to be monitored for all groundwater resources.<br />
· Effective control of discharges from all WWTW within SDM to be developed and<br />
initiated.<br />
· A management model to be developed for the 605 villages, over 40 sub-water scheme<br />
areas and thousands of boreholes within the SDM. The fundamental approach for SDM<br />
must be decided within the Section 78 process.<br />
DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN (DMP)<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted the Disaster Management Plan in 2007 and<br />
reviewed it in 2010. The main purpose of the Disaster Management Plan (DMP) is inter alia to<br />
implement appropriate disaster risk reduction measures to reduce the vulnerability of<br />
communities and infrastructure at risk. The DMP is in line with national policy (National<br />
Disaster Management Framework), which requires the following:<br />
· The compilation of a Disaster Management Framework (policy).<br />
· The execution of a detailed disaster hazard, vulnerability and risk assessment.<br />
· The compilation of disaster risk reduction measures.<br />
· The compilation of appropriate Standing Operating Procedures (SOP’s).<br />
· Establishment of a <strong>District</strong> Disaster Management Centre (DDMC).
444<br />
· Establishment of a Disaster Management Advisory Forum.<br />
· Capacity Building, training and awareness programmes.<br />
Hence, to accommodate the above-mentioned requirements, the DMP for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) comprises various plans, namely;<br />
· <strong>District</strong> Disaster Management Framework (policy).<br />
· Disaster Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Plan.<br />
· Disaster Risk Reduction Plan.<br />
· Disaster Response and Recovery Plan (SOP’s and checklists).<br />
· <strong>District</strong> Disaster Management Centre Plan.<br />
· Guidelines to establish the Disaster Management Advisory Forum and Volunteer<br />
Contingent<br />
6.4. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />
LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted its strategy in 2004 and reviewed it in 2007.<br />
This plan is based on identified development needs, opportunities and comparative advantages<br />
of the area, and guides the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> to create and facilitate economic development,<br />
unlock the latent economic development potential, encourage private sector investment and job<br />
creation.<br />
The plan is to be used as a tool by the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> to ensure the dedicated and effective<br />
utilization of available resources to promote local economic development in a proactive and<br />
dynamic manner.<br />
Implementation of this LED strategy urges (1) the need to establish the proposed institutional<br />
drivers. These establishments need to be accompanied by (2) a political ambition to ensure<br />
success. This ambition can be initiated and developed through the inclusion of all interested<br />
and affected parties, stakeholders and role players during the planning and implementation<br />
phases. By including all of these (3) a political will, interest and communication are stimulated<br />
which, all together will contribute to the success of the strategy.<br />
Another important aspect for successful implementation is (4) to ensure that all involved take<br />
ownership of the programmes and projects. Without the taking of ownership of a programme<br />
and/or project, success cannot be seen at the end of the tunnel. It is also important (5) to<br />
incorporate the monitoring and evaluation elements of the strategy into the performance
445<br />
management system of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>, to ensure accountability and<br />
responsibility for implementation and eradicate potential conflicts.<br />
6.5. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK<br />
Introduction<br />
The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted its Performance Management<br />
system in 2008 and reviewed it in 2009/10 financial year. The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
<strong>Municipality</strong> has institutionalized the Culture of Performance Management among<br />
its Political Office Bearers, Councillors and its Administration. This has ensured<br />
that the service delivery is administered in an economical, effective, efficient and<br />
accountable manner.<br />
Performance Management System and the <strong>IDP</strong> process are seamlessly integrated. Whereas<br />
the <strong>IDP</strong> fulfills the planning stage, Performance Management in turn fulfills the implementation,<br />
management, monitoring and evaluation of the <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />
It is critical to note that PMS should provide a mechanism and facilitate an increased<br />
accountability between the following role players:<br />
· The Community and the Municipal Council<br />
· The Political and Administrative components of SDM.<br />
· Each department and the office of the Municipal Manager<br />
Furthermore, PMS does facilitate learning and improvements by outlining the approaches bring<br />
the desired impact to enable SDM improve delivery. Also that PMS forms the basis for<br />
Monitoring, Evaluation and Improving <strong>IDP</strong> implementation.<br />
PMS provides early warning diagnostic signals of the potential risks that are likely linked to<br />
implementation of the <strong>IDP</strong>. Such timeous information on risks enables facilitation of<br />
interventions.<br />
Principles of PMS<br />
The following principles have successfully been the core foundation of PMS processes:<br />
Table 102: Principles of PMS
446<br />
Principle<br />
Ownership and Support<br />
Participatory<br />
Linkage/Integration<br />
Compatibility<br />
Alignment<br />
Fair and objective<br />
Decision making<br />
Politically Driven<br />
Roles and Responsibilities<br />
Intervention<br />
The PMS should be owned by the municipality<br />
and supported by other spheres of government.<br />
The system must place the SDM community at<br />
the centre of local government processes<br />
Performance Management system must be<br />
linked to the <strong>IDP</strong> Framework. PMS and <strong>IDP</strong><br />
complement each other, therefore PMS<br />
planning phase must occur within the<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget planning phase.<br />
The PMS must be developed and implemented<br />
within available capacity and resources. It must<br />
be user-friendly enabling the municipality to<br />
manage it within its existing institutional and<br />
financial resources.<br />
The system must align to other municipal<br />
activities and allow for joint responsibility and<br />
accountability.<br />
Performance management will be founded on<br />
fairness and objectivity in the recognition of<br />
poor or good performance.<br />
PMS decision making processes will not be<br />
used to victimize or give an unfair advantage to<br />
an individual or group of people.<br />
The political principals must buy in and<br />
participate and take a lead in development and<br />
implementation of the system.<br />
The following are Roles and Responsibilities of various stakeholders critical to the<br />
implementation of PMS and are outlined as follows:<br />
Table 103: Roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders in PMS<br />
Stakehold Planning Implementation Monitoring & <strong>Review</strong>ing Reporting<br />
ers<br />
Analysis<br />
Executive 1. Facilitate<br />
1. Receive monthly 1. <strong>Review</strong> 1. Report on<br />
Mayor development<br />
reports on performance organizational<br />
of <strong>IDP</strong> and<br />
implementation of of MM performance to the<br />
PMS<br />
PMS<br />
quarterly Council<br />
Municipal 1. Assign 1. Oversee 1. Evaluate reports 1. Use audit 1. Submit
447<br />
Manager overall<br />
planning of<br />
PMS<br />
2. Manage<br />
development<br />
of<br />
departmental<br />
managers<br />
performance<br />
management<br />
systems,<br />
3. Manages<br />
development<br />
of<br />
subordinate’s<br />
performance<br />
management<br />
systems.<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> 1. Co-ordinate<br />
COMMITT and manage<br />
EE PMS<br />
2. Report to<br />
Council on<br />
PMS<br />
3. Assign PMS<br />
responsibility<br />
to MM.<br />
Staff 1. Participate<br />
in developing<br />
Departmental<br />
plans.<br />
2. Participate<br />
in developing<br />
own<br />
performance<br />
measurement<br />
implementation<br />
of PMS<br />
alignment with<br />
other systems.<br />
2. Manage<br />
implementation<br />
of subordinate<br />
performance<br />
measurement<br />
systems.<br />
1. Execute<br />
individual plans<br />
from HODs.<br />
2. Propose<br />
adjustment on the<br />
basis of report.<br />
3. Identify<br />
underperformance<br />
in respect of<br />
department and<br />
employee<br />
performance.<br />
1. Report on<br />
performance to line<br />
managers.<br />
report to<br />
evaluate<br />
performance.<br />
2. Assess<br />
performance<br />
according to<br />
plans.<br />
3. Propose<br />
measures for<br />
improvement.<br />
4. Assess<br />
subordinates<br />
performance<br />
quarterly.<br />
1. Receive<br />
reports from<br />
internal audit<br />
committee.<br />
2. Make<br />
recommendati<br />
ons based on<br />
the reports.<br />
1. Participate<br />
in review of<br />
departmental<br />
plans and<br />
own<br />
performance<br />
and make<br />
necessary<br />
adjustment.<br />
Performance<br />
reports to:<br />
-Council<br />
-Council<br />
Committee<br />
- Community, on<br />
annual basis.<br />
1. Receive<br />
quarterly and<br />
annual reports and<br />
make<br />
recommendations<br />
to management.<br />
1. Submit reports<br />
on performance to<br />
line managers.<br />
2. Receive reports<br />
on<br />
own<br />
performance from<br />
Departmental<br />
managers.
448<br />
Council<br />
Committe<br />
e<br />
Council<br />
Internal<br />
Audit<br />
Committe<br />
e<br />
1. Make inputs<br />
in divisional<br />
plans<br />
2. Responsible<br />
for public<br />
participation<br />
1. Assign PMS<br />
responsibility<br />
to <strong>IDP</strong><br />
committee.<br />
2. Adopt PMS<br />
Framework,<br />
Indicator and<br />
Set targets.<br />
3. Ensure PMS<br />
is in line with<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
1. Appoint Audit<br />
Committee.<br />
2. Monitor<br />
Municipal<br />
Performance.<br />
1. Develops<br />
reporting<br />
procedures.<br />
1. <strong>Review</strong><br />
divisional<br />
plans<br />
2. Participate<br />
in quarterly<br />
review of<br />
committees.<br />
1. <strong>Review</strong><br />
Municipal<br />
Performance<br />
reports and<br />
make<br />
recommendati<br />
ons on<br />
performance<br />
of<br />
departments,<br />
MM, and<br />
Executive<br />
Mayor, and<br />
Executive<br />
Committee.<br />
Assess:<br />
1.<br />
Functionality<br />
of PMS.<br />
2. PMS<br />
complies with<br />
the Act.<br />
3. Reliability<br />
in measuring<br />
performance.<br />
4. Audit<br />
performance<br />
measurement<br />
of<br />
municipality.<br />
1. Receive<br />
departmental<br />
reports.<br />
2. Receive<br />
performance<br />
reports from MM.<br />
3. Make<br />
recommendations<br />
to council.<br />
1. Submit annual<br />
report to Auditor<br />
General/ MEC.<br />
2. Receive reports<br />
from MM.<br />
3. Receive reports<br />
from performance<br />
audit committee.<br />
1. Submit reports<br />
to performance<br />
audit committee,
449<br />
Audit<br />
Committe<br />
e<br />
Auditor<br />
General<br />
1. Develop<br />
reporting<br />
procedures and<br />
formats.<br />
2. Develop code of<br />
conduct for its<br />
members.<br />
1. Ensures legal<br />
compliance.<br />
1. Receives<br />
reports from<br />
the internal<br />
audit<br />
committee.<br />
2. Make<br />
comments on<br />
reports.<br />
1. Submit reports<br />
to the council.<br />
1. Receives<br />
annual reports.<br />
2. Represented in<br />
the council when<br />
annual report is<br />
adopted.<br />
Accountability structure during the review process<br />
Table 104: Accountability structure during the review process<br />
Lines of Accountability<br />
<strong>Review</strong> Role/Input<br />
Supervisor and Municipal Manager<br />
<strong>Review</strong> performance of employees reporting<br />
directly to them (quarterly)<br />
Line/Functional Managers <strong>Review</strong> performance of their respective<br />
functional areas(Monthly)<br />
Standing/Portfolio Committees<br />
Executive Management (Section 57)<br />
Teams<br />
Executive or Mayoral<br />
Council<br />
The Public<br />
Manage and review performance of sectors<br />
and function respective to their portfolios.<br />
<strong>Review</strong> performance of the organization<br />
constantly(monthly)<br />
<strong>Review</strong> performance of the administration<br />
<strong>Review</strong> the performance of the Municipal<br />
Council, Its Committees and the<br />
Administration.<br />
<strong>Review</strong> the performance of the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
and Public representatives (Councilors).
450<br />
It is critical to note that Organizational Performance is integrally linked to that of the staff and<br />
Council performance. The two cannot exist independently without concerted and aligned PMS<br />
processes. The relationship between staff performance and Council performance starts from<br />
the planning, implementation, monitoring up to review of PMS.<br />
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION FRAMEWORK<br />
The public participation policy framework has been adopted by Council and is reviewed<br />
annually. The objectives of the policy are as follows;<br />
· Meet the legal requirements around community participation that are spelled out in the<br />
Municipal systems Act No. 32 of 2000.<br />
· Build an open, transparent and accountable system of governance.<br />
· Develop a culture of community participation through creating conditions for local<br />
communities to participate in the affairs of the municipality.<br />
· Assist vulnerable groups to participate effectively in the system of local government.<br />
· Provide clear, sufficient and timeous information concerning community participation to<br />
communities.<br />
· Communicate decisions of Council.<br />
· Communicate public notices of meetings for communities in a manner that promotes<br />
optimal public participation.<br />
· Set up systems and mechanisms that will ensure compliance with regulations and<br />
guidelines that may be issued from National or Provincial Government.<br />
The Public Participation policy framework spells out the roles and responsibilities of;<br />
· Council,<br />
· Executive Mayor,<br />
· The Speaker,<br />
· Portfolio and Standing Committees,<br />
· Ward Councilors,<br />
· Management and Administration,<br />
· The Public (Ward Committees) and<br />
· Community Development Workers<br />
6.6. FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
The following budget related policies were also reviewed alongside the budget:<br />
1. Tariff policy and structure<br />
2. Indigent policy
451<br />
3. Free Basic Water policy<br />
4. Credit control and debt collection policy<br />
5. Investment and cash management policy<br />
6. Asset management policy<br />
7. Funding and reserve policy<br />
Water and Sanitation Tariff Policy <strong>2013</strong><br />
Purpose:<br />
· To set clear guidelines in the identification of responsibility for the setting and<br />
implementation of a tariff policy for the <strong>Municipality</strong>;<br />
· To set guidelines for the identification of different categories of users;<br />
· To set guidelines for the determination of tariffs for the different categories of users and<br />
services rendered;<br />
· The policy will further lay down the broad principles, which will result in the adoption of a<br />
by-law for the implementation and enforcement of the Tariff Policy. Service tariffs<br />
imposed by the municipality shall be viewed as user charges and shall not be viewed as<br />
taxes.<br />
Scope of the policy<br />
• The policy is applicable to water and sanitation services provided by <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />
• This policy is also applicable to all sundry tariffs as provided for in the Schedule of<br />
Tariffs of the <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />
Free Basic Water Policy<br />
The purpose of the policy is to outline the Free Basic Water Policy for SDM area of jurisdiction.<br />
As part of government strategy to alleviate poverty in South Africa a policy for the provision of a<br />
free basic level of services has been introduced. In response to this commitment, the<br />
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWA) commenced the implementation of phase 1 of<br />
a national free basic water strategy in February 2001. The free basic water policy is not new to<br />
the South African water sector. Indeed, in terms of the Water Services Act 108 of 1997,<br />
provision was made for those people who cannot afford to pay for a basic water supply.<br />
The primary intention of the policy is to ensure that no one is completely denied access to a<br />
water supply because they are unable to pay for the water service. Underlying this policy is a
452<br />
recognition that the supply of water at a ‘basic’ level assists in alleviating poverty, improves<br />
community health and frees women from time wasted on carrying water.<br />
Indigent Policy <strong>2013</strong><br />
Objective<br />
Because of the level of unemployment and subsequent poverty in the municipal area, there are<br />
households which are unable to pay for normal municipal services. The municipality therefore<br />
adopts this indigence management policy to ensure that these households have access to at<br />
least basic municipal services, and is guided in the formulation of this policy by the national<br />
government’s policy in this regard.<br />
Criteria for identification as indigent:<br />
- Households where verified total gross monthly income of all occupants over 18 years of<br />
age does not exceed the pension grant as determined by the government.<br />
- The threshold for qualifying as an indigent in a single household where more than two<br />
occupants receives old age pension grants shall be the twice old age grant determined<br />
by the government.<br />
- Any occupant or resident of the single household referred to above does not own any<br />
property in addition to the property in respect of which indigent support is provided<br />
- The account of a deceased estate may be subsidised if the surviving spouse or<br />
dependents of the deceased who occupy the property, also apply and qualify for<br />
indigent support.<br />
- For a household to qualify for subsidies or rebates on the major service charges (see<br />
part 3 below), the registered indigent must be the fulltime occupant of the property<br />
concerned, may not own any other property, whether in or out of the municipal area.<br />
- Child welfare grants are exempted as part of total income per household as the child is<br />
under 18 years of age.<br />
Application of the policy<br />
· The subsidies on the specified service charges will be determined as part of each<br />
annual budget and in terms of the municipality’s policies on tariffs<br />
· In respect of water, a 100% subsidy up to 6kl per household per month including basic<br />
charge will apply, however, if consumption exceeds 6kl per metering period (month) the<br />
consumer will be charged at normal tariffs for actual consumption on the quantity<br />
exceeding 6kl plus basic charge.<br />
· In respect of sewerage charges, the relief granted shall not be less than a rebate of 50%<br />
on the monthly amount billed for the service concerned.
453<br />
Credit Control and Debt Collection Policy<br />
Objectives:<br />
‣ The Council of SDM, in adopting this policy on credit control and debt collection,<br />
recognises its constitutional obligations to develop the local economy and to provide<br />
acceptable services to its residents.<br />
‣ It simultaneously acknowledges that it cannot fulfil these constitutional obligations<br />
unless it exacts payment for the services which it provides and for the taxes which it<br />
legitimately levies – in full from those residents who can afford to pay, and in<br />
accordance with its indigency relief measures for those who have registered as<br />
indigents in terms of the council’s approved indigency management policy.<br />
‣ Ensure that all money due and payable to SDM in respect of fees for services,<br />
surcharges on such fees, charges, tariffs, interest which had accrued on any amounts<br />
due and payable in respect of the foregoing and any collection charges are collected<br />
efficiently and promptly.<br />
Funding and Reserve Policy<br />
The funding and reserve policy is aimed at ensuring that the municipality has the sufficient and<br />
cost effective funding in order to achieve its objectives through the implementation of its<br />
operating and capital budgets. This policy aims to set guidelines towards ensuring financial<br />
viability over both the short and long term which includes reserves requirements.<br />
The policy shall apply to the Council and all officials who have formal, administrative duty to<br />
prepare, manage and control the municipality’s budget and expenditure.<br />
Asset Management Policy<br />
The objectives of Asset Management Policy can be summarised as follows:<br />
- To ensure effective and efficient control, utilization, safeguarding and management of<br />
SDM’s property, plant and equipment<br />
- To ensure that asset managers are aware of their responsibilities in regards to property,<br />
plant and equipment<br />
- To set out the standards of physical management, recording and internal controls to<br />
ensure property, plant and equipment are safeguarded against loss or utilization<br />
- To specify the process required before expenditure on property , plant and equipment in<br />
SDM including:
454<br />
• The criteria to be met before expenditure can be capitalised as an item of property,<br />
plants and equipment<br />
• The criteria for determining initial costs of different items of property, plant and<br />
equipment<br />
• Classification of property, plant and equipment<br />
The utilization and management of property, plant and equipment is the prime mechanism by<br />
which a municipality can fulfil its constitutional mandates for: delivery of sustainable services,<br />
social and economic development, promoting safe and healthy environment, providing the basic<br />
needs to the community.<br />
Investment and cash management policy<br />
The Council of SDM is the trustee of public revenues, which it collects, and it therefore has an<br />
obligation to the community to ensure that the municipality’s cash resources are managed<br />
effectively and efficiently. Therefore the council has to invest the revenues knowledgeably and<br />
judiciously. The aim of the policy is therefore to gain an optimal return on investment, without<br />
incurring undue risks, during those periods when cash revenues are not needed for capital or<br />
operational purposes. The effectiveness of the policy is dependent on the SDM’s cash<br />
management program which must identify the amounts surplus to the municipality’s needs. All<br />
monies due to SDM must be collected as soon as possible, either on or immediately after the<br />
due date and banked on a daily basis.<br />
Supply Chain Management Policy<br />
All procurement policies (including those addressing preferential procurement), procedures and<br />
practices must be consistent with legislative requirements, in particular part 1 of chapter 11 and<br />
other provision of the MFMA. The SCM policy is implemented in the context of the MFMA of<br />
2003 and SCM regulations, read together with the Constitution, preferential procurement policy<br />
framework Act of 2000, and the BBBE Act of 2003. The principal objective of the policy is to<br />
provide guidelines, governing processes and procedures within the supply chain management:<br />
- Procuring goods and services<br />
- Disposing goods, assets and immovable property no longer needed<br />
- Selecting contractors to provide assistance in the provision of municipal services other<br />
than that where Chapter 8 of the Municipal Systems Act applies
455<br />
ANNEXURE A<br />
SERVICE DELIVERY AND BUDGET<br />
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SDBIP) <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>
456<br />
SERVICE DELIVERY AND BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION PLAN <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> FOR<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />
Section <strong>14</strong> (2) and (3) Municipal Budget and Reporting Regulations 2008 states:<br />
“when complying with section 68 of the Act, the Municipal manager must submit the draft<br />
Municipal Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan to the Mayor together with annual<br />
budget to be considered by the Mayor for tabling in terms of section 16 (2) of the Act”<br />
It further states:<br />
“for effective planning and implementation of the annual budget, the draft municipal service<br />
delivery and budget implementation plan may form part of the budget documentation and be<br />
tabled in the municipal council if so recommended by budget steering committee”<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has prepared the draft SDBIP for <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> in line with the<br />
Local Government Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003 (Act no.56 of 2003)<br />
The SDBIP has been prepared in line with the Local Government National Key Performance<br />
Areas as follows:<br />
· Basic Service Delivery and Infrastructure<br />
· Financial Viability<br />
· Local Economic Development<br />
· Good Governance and Public Participation<br />
· Institutional Development and organisational transformation<br />
· Spatial Rationale<br />
Section 9 (2) (a) of the Municipal Planning and Performance Management Regulations, 2001<br />
states:<br />
“In setting key performance indicators, a municipality must ensure that<br />
(a) Communities are involved<br />
(b) Key performance indicators inform the indicators set for<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
All its administrative units and employees; and<br />
Every municipal entity and service provider with whom the municipality has<br />
entered into service delivery agreement.
457<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
01/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
02/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
03/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Bursarie<br />
s<br />
Experien<br />
tial<br />
Learning<br />
Internshi<br />
ps<br />
To<br />
facilitat<br />
e skills<br />
develo<br />
pment<br />
initiativ<br />
es and<br />
create<br />
conduc<br />
ive<br />
enviro<br />
nment<br />
for<br />
learnin<br />
g<br />
Bursaryholders<br />
Graduates<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
bursaries<br />
awarded<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
experient<br />
ial<br />
learners<br />
accomm<br />
odated<br />
Number<br />
of interns<br />
engaged<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
54<br />
Learn<br />
ers in<br />
differe<br />
nt field<br />
of<br />
studie<br />
s<br />
award<br />
ed<br />
bursar<br />
ies.<br />
19<br />
experi<br />
ential<br />
learne<br />
rs<br />
10<br />
interns<br />
10<br />
bursaries<br />
(5<br />
internal +<br />
5<br />
external)<br />
10<br />
learners<br />
(2Human<br />
Resourc<br />
es, 2 IT,<br />
2<br />
Technica<br />
l<br />
Services,<br />
2<br />
Finance<br />
And 2<br />
Commun<br />
ications)<br />
0 5 5 0 Memo<br />
of<br />
approv<br />
ed<br />
bursar<br />
y<br />
holder<br />
s and<br />
award<br />
letters<br />
to<br />
applica<br />
nts<br />
0 5 5 0 learner<br />
ship<br />
contra<br />
cts<br />
30 0 30 0 0 mentor<br />
ship<br />
reports<br />
R 4<br />
000<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Capable<br />
workforc<br />
e<br />
improve<br />
d<br />
employa<br />
bility<br />
improve<br />
d<br />
employa<br />
bility
458<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
04/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
05/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
06/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Learners<br />
hip<br />
program<br />
me<br />
Recogniti<br />
on of<br />
Prior<br />
Learning<br />
(RPL)<br />
Adult<br />
Educatio<br />
n and<br />
Training<br />
(AET)<br />
qualificatio<br />
n<br />
qualificatio<br />
n<br />
qualificatio<br />
n<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Percenta<br />
ge of<br />
learnersh<br />
ip<br />
program<br />
mes<br />
impleme<br />
nted<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
employe<br />
es<br />
subjecte<br />
d to RPL<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
employe<br />
es<br />
subjecte<br />
d to AET<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
178<br />
learne<br />
rs<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
100% 10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Annual<br />
Trainin<br />
g<br />
Report<br />
50 0 25 25 0 Annual<br />
Trainin<br />
g<br />
Report<br />
50 0 50 0 0 Annual<br />
Trainin<br />
g<br />
Report<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
capable<br />
workforc<br />
e<br />
improve<br />
d<br />
employa<br />
bility<br />
literacy<br />
and<br />
numerac<br />
y
459<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
07/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
08/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
(Skills<br />
Program<br />
me)<br />
Skills<br />
Indaba<br />
certificate<br />
of<br />
competenc<br />
e<br />
training<br />
plan<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
percenta<br />
ge skills<br />
program<br />
me for<br />
employe<br />
es<br />
impleme<br />
nted<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
achieve<br />
ment for<br />
undertaki<br />
ng skills<br />
indaba<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
100%<br />
skills<br />
program<br />
me<br />
impleme<br />
nted<br />
0% 100%<br />
skills<br />
indaba<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
(1.conce<br />
pt<br />
documen<br />
-25%,<br />
2.stakeh<br />
older<br />
mobilisati<br />
on-25%,<br />
3.indaba<br />
logistics-<br />
50%)<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Annual<br />
Trainin<br />
g<br />
Report<br />
Exit<br />
report<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
improve<br />
d<br />
producti<br />
vity<br />
informed<br />
public
460<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
09/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
10/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
11/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Occup<br />
ational<br />
Health<br />
and<br />
Safety<br />
(OHS)<br />
Workplac<br />
e Skills<br />
Plan(WS<br />
P)/Annua<br />
l Training<br />
(ATR)<br />
Occupati<br />
onal<br />
Health<br />
and<br />
Safety<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
sound<br />
knowle<br />
dge<br />
base<br />
and<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
To<br />
promot<br />
e a<br />
healthy<br />
and<br />
safe<br />
workin<br />
g<br />
enviro<br />
nment<br />
WSP<br />
ATR<br />
Healthy<br />
work<br />
spaces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
WSP<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
compilati<br />
on of<br />
ATR<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
review of<br />
OHS<br />
Policy<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
establish<br />
ment of<br />
Safety<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
WSP<br />
submit<br />
ted<br />
2011/<br />
2012<br />
ATR<br />
submit<br />
ted<br />
100% (1.<br />
data<br />
gathering<br />
-50%, 2.<br />
compilati<br />
on-20%,<br />
3.<br />
consultat<br />
ion-25%,<br />
4.<br />
submissi<br />
on-5%)<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100% 0<br />
%<br />
100% 10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100% 10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0 Proof<br />
of<br />
service<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
service<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resoluti<br />
on<br />
Commi<br />
ttee<br />
establi<br />
shmen<br />
t report<br />
R<br />
600<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
enhance<br />
d<br />
planning<br />
improve<br />
d<br />
producti<br />
vity<br />
institutio<br />
nalised<br />
safety<br />
culture<br />
institutio<br />
nalised<br />
safety<br />
culture
461<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
Committ<br />
ees<br />
es<br />
ODT/0<br />
12/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
13/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Emplo<br />
yee<br />
Assista<br />
nce<br />
Progra<br />
mme<br />
(EAP)<br />
Compen<br />
sation for<br />
Occupati<br />
onal<br />
Injuries<br />
and<br />
Disease<br />
Act<br />
(COIDA)<br />
EAP<br />
Framewo<br />
rk<br />
To<br />
promot<br />
e a<br />
healthy<br />
and<br />
safe<br />
workin<br />
g<br />
enviro<br />
nment<br />
To<br />
promot<br />
e<br />
employ<br />
ee<br />
health<br />
and<br />
wellne<br />
Healthy<br />
work<br />
spaces<br />
EAP<br />
Framework<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
awarene<br />
ss<br />
campaig<br />
ns<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of drills<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
%<br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
EAP<br />
Framewo<br />
rk<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
4 1 1 1 1 quarter<br />
ly<br />
reports<br />
4 1 1 1 1 quarter<br />
ly<br />
reports<br />
100% 10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0 0 0 Counci<br />
l<br />
resoluti<br />
on<br />
770<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
institutio<br />
nalised<br />
safety<br />
culture<br />
institutio<br />
nalised<br />
safety<br />
culture<br />
sound<br />
administ<br />
ration
462<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
<strong>14</strong>/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
15/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
16/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
17/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Labour<br />
Relatio<br />
ns<br />
EAP<br />
Committ<br />
ees<br />
EAP<br />
Training<br />
EAP<br />
Reportin<br />
g<br />
Local<br />
Labour<br />
Forum<br />
(LLF)<br />
ss<br />
To<br />
promot<br />
e<br />
sound<br />
labour<br />
relatio<br />
ns<br />
EAP<br />
Committee<br />
s<br />
Training<br />
record<br />
EAP<br />
Report<br />
meetings<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
%<br />
establish<br />
ment of<br />
EAP<br />
Committ<br />
ees<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
training<br />
initiatives<br />
provided<br />
to EAP<br />
committe<br />
es<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
quarterly<br />
reports<br />
issued<br />
Number<br />
of LLF<br />
Meetings<br />
held<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
4<br />
quarte<br />
rly<br />
report<br />
s<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
12<br />
meetin<br />
gs<br />
100% 0 0 0 0 Establi<br />
shmen<br />
t report<br />
2 1 1 0 0 Trainin<br />
g<br />
Report<br />
4<br />
quarterly<br />
reports<br />
12<br />
Meetings<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
1 1 1 1 E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
3 3 3 3 Signed<br />
minute<br />
s<br />
50<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
sound<br />
administ<br />
ration<br />
enhance<br />
d<br />
producti<br />
vity<br />
acounta<br />
bility<br />
Labour<br />
peace
463<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
s<br />
ODT/0<br />
18/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
19/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
20/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Committ<br />
ee<br />
Training<br />
Labour<br />
Relations<br />
Bulletin/<br />
Publicati<br />
ons<br />
Reportin<br />
g<br />
Training<br />
committee<br />
Bulletins<br />
Reports<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
Res<br />
ourc<br />
es<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
review of<br />
training<br />
committe<br />
e<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
Labour<br />
Relations<br />
Bulletins<br />
issued<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
reports<br />
generate<br />
d<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
trainin<br />
g<br />
commi<br />
ttee<br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
4<br />
Bulleti<br />
ns<br />
issued<br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
12<br />
100%<br />
review of<br />
training<br />
committe<br />
e<br />
4<br />
Bulletins<br />
4<br />
Reports<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Memb<br />
ership<br />
report<br />
1 1 1 1 Bulleti<br />
ns<br />
1 1 1 1 Counci<br />
l<br />
resoluti<br />
on<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Account<br />
ability<br />
Informed<br />
Labour<br />
Force<br />
Account<br />
ability
464<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
21/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
22/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ce<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
HR Plan,<br />
HR<br />
Policies<br />
and<br />
Procedur<br />
es<br />
Successi<br />
on<br />
Plan/Car<br />
eer<br />
Pathing<br />
To<br />
provid<br />
e<br />
sound<br />
and<br />
sustain<br />
able<br />
human<br />
resour<br />
ces<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
HR Plan<br />
Policies<br />
and<br />
procedures<br />
Successio<br />
n Plan<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
Res<br />
ourc<br />
es<br />
hum<br />
an<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Percenta<br />
ge HR<br />
Plan<br />
develope<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
policies<br />
and<br />
procedur<br />
es<br />
reviewed<br />
/develop<br />
ed<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
Successi<br />
on Plan<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
30 HR<br />
Policie<br />
s in<br />
place<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
100%<br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
HR Plan<br />
(1) data<br />
gathering<br />
50% (2)<br />
draft plan<br />
25% (3)<br />
approval<br />
25%<br />
31<br />
policies<br />
reviewed<br />
/develop<br />
ed<br />
100%<br />
Develop<br />
ment of<br />
Successi<br />
on Plan<br />
(1) Data<br />
gathering<br />
50%, (2)<br />
Draft<br />
Plan<br />
25% (3)<br />
50<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resoluti<br />
on<br />
7 8 8 8 Counci<br />
l<br />
resoluti<br />
on<br />
50<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resoluti<br />
on<br />
130<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Sound<br />
administ<br />
ration<br />
Sound<br />
administ<br />
ration<br />
Organis<br />
ational<br />
Sustaina<br />
bility
465<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
<strong>23</strong>/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
24/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Retentio<br />
n<br />
Strategy<br />
Employm<br />
ent<br />
Equity<br />
Plan<br />
(EEP)<br />
Retention<br />
Strategy<br />
Employme<br />
nt Equity<br />
Plan<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
Retentio<br />
n<br />
Strategy<br />
<strong>Review</strong>e<br />
d<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
Employm<br />
ent<br />
Equity<br />
Targets<br />
achieved<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Retent<br />
ion<br />
Strate<br />
gy<br />
Emplo<br />
yment<br />
Equity<br />
Plan<br />
Approval<br />
25%<br />
100%<br />
Retentio<br />
n<br />
Strategy<br />
<strong>Review</strong>e<br />
d (1)<br />
Data<br />
gathering<br />
50%, (2)<br />
Draft<br />
Plan<br />
25% (3)<br />
Approval<br />
25%<br />
100%<br />
Employm<br />
ent<br />
Equity<br />
Targets<br />
achieved<br />
(Employ<br />
ment<br />
Equity<br />
Report)<br />
50<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resoluti<br />
on<br />
Recruit<br />
ment<br />
and<br />
Selecti<br />
on<br />
Report<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Organis<br />
ational<br />
Sustaina<br />
bility<br />
Empowe<br />
rment of<br />
designat<br />
ed<br />
groups
466<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
25/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
26/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
27/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Inform<br />
ation<br />
and<br />
Comm<br />
unicati<br />
on<br />
Techn<br />
ology<br />
(ICT)<br />
Recruitm<br />
ent and<br />
Selection<br />
Relocatio<br />
n<br />
expense<br />
s<br />
User<br />
Require<br />
ments<br />
analysis<br />
To<br />
provid<br />
e a<br />
conduc<br />
ive and<br />
sustain<br />
able<br />
enviro<br />
nment<br />
for<br />
Inform<br />
ation<br />
and<br />
Comm<br />
unicati<br />
Reduced<br />
vacancy<br />
rate<br />
Payment<br />
User<br />
Requireme<br />
nts<br />
Analysis<br />
Report<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
vacancy<br />
rate of<br />
funded<br />
posts<br />
kept<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
payment<br />
facilitate<br />
d<br />
Percenta<br />
ge user<br />
requirem<br />
ents<br />
analysis<br />
complete<br />
d<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
2<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
facilita<br />
ted<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
5% 5<br />
%<br />
100% 10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100%<br />
user<br />
requirem<br />
ents<br />
analysis<br />
complete<br />
d (1)<br />
Data<br />
gathering<br />
50%, (2)<br />
Draft<br />
Report<br />
25% (3)<br />
Approval<br />
25%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Recruit<br />
ment<br />
and<br />
Selecti<br />
on<br />
Report<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
User<br />
Requir<br />
ement<br />
s<br />
Analysi<br />
s<br />
Report<br />
R<br />
250<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
0 E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Organis<br />
ational<br />
Sustaina<br />
bility<br />
Stable<br />
Organis<br />
ation<br />
ENSUR<br />
E AN<br />
EFFECT<br />
IVE AND<br />
EFFICIE<br />
NT<br />
MUNICI<br />
PAL<br />
ADMINI<br />
STRATI<br />
ON
467<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
28/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Policy<br />
Analysis<br />
on<br />
Techn<br />
ology<br />
Policies<br />
and<br />
procedures<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
policies<br />
and<br />
procedur<br />
es<br />
reviewed<br />
/develop<br />
ed<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2<br />
Policie<br />
s and<br />
proce<br />
dures<br />
6 policies<br />
and<br />
procedur<br />
es<br />
reviewed<br />
/develop<br />
ed<br />
1 2 2 1 Counci<br />
l<br />
resoluti<br />
on<br />
0 E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Sound<br />
Administ<br />
ration<br />
ODT/0<br />
29/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
30/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ICT<br />
System<br />
Support<br />
ICT<br />
Upgrade<br />
s<br />
(wireless<br />
network)<br />
Support<br />
Provided<br />
wireless<br />
network<br />
available<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
Support<br />
provided<br />
to end<br />
users<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
wireless<br />
network<br />
available<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
User<br />
suppo<br />
rt<br />
100%<br />
upgra<br />
des<br />
done<br />
100%<br />
support<br />
provided<br />
90%<br />
wireless<br />
network<br />
available<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
90<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
90<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
90<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
90<br />
%<br />
Signed<br />
-off<br />
Report<br />
Signed<br />
off<br />
system<br />
report<br />
2<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
000<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration
468<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
31/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
32/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
33/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ICT<br />
Maintena<br />
nce<br />
Compute<br />
r<br />
consuma<br />
bles and<br />
accessor<br />
ies<br />
Commun<br />
ication<br />
(land<br />
lines,<br />
internet,<br />
email<br />
infrastruc<br />
ture<br />
expansio<br />
n)<br />
Functional<br />
ICT<br />
Consumab<br />
les and<br />
accessorie<br />
s available<br />
Communic<br />
ation<br />
networks<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Percenta<br />
ge ICT<br />
infrastruc<br />
ture<br />
maintain<br />
ed<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
acquisitio<br />
n of<br />
consuma<br />
bles and<br />
accessor<br />
ies<br />
requeste<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of sites<br />
included<br />
in the<br />
network<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
100%<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
done<br />
100%<br />
consu<br />
mable<br />
s<br />
acquir<br />
ed<br />
All<br />
offices<br />
except<br />
certain<br />
depos<br />
and<br />
region<br />
s<br />
conne<br />
cted to<br />
the<br />
100%<br />
ICT<br />
infrastruc<br />
ture<br />
maintain<br />
ed<br />
(1)repair<br />
s<br />
(2)replac<br />
ements<br />
100%<br />
acquisitio<br />
n of<br />
consuma<br />
bles and<br />
accessor<br />
ies<br />
requeste<br />
d<br />
18 sites<br />
included<br />
in the<br />
network<br />
(1)depot<br />
s<br />
(2)region<br />
al offices<br />
(3)fire<br />
stations<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Mainte<br />
nance<br />
Report<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
0 9 0 9 Signed<br />
-off<br />
Report<br />
R<br />
700<br />
000<br />
R<br />
200<br />
000<br />
R 4<br />
819<br />
693.<br />
96<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration
469<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
networ<br />
k<br />
ODT/0<br />
34/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
35/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Software<br />
and ICT<br />
Licenses<br />
Compute<br />
r<br />
equipme<br />
nt and<br />
accessor<br />
ies<br />
Software<br />
and ICT<br />
Licenses<br />
available<br />
Computer<br />
equipment<br />
and<br />
accessorie<br />
s acquired<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
software<br />
licenses<br />
paid<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
computer<br />
equipme<br />
nt and<br />
accessor<br />
ies<br />
acquired<br />
as and<br />
when<br />
requeste<br />
d<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Licens<br />
es<br />
with<br />
ICT<br />
Servic<br />
e<br />
provid<br />
ers<br />
paid<br />
100%<br />
compu<br />
ter<br />
equip<br />
ment<br />
and<br />
acces<br />
sories<br />
acquir<br />
ed<br />
100%<br />
software<br />
licenses<br />
paid<br />
100%<br />
records<br />
disposed<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
Signed<br />
-off<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
R 2<br />
300<br />
000<br />
R<br />
500<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration
470<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
36/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
37/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
38/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Organi<br />
sationa<br />
l<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Security<br />
upgrades<br />
server<br />
room<br />
Professio<br />
nal Fees<br />
Procedur<br />
e<br />
Manuals<br />
To<br />
improv<br />
e<br />
instituti<br />
onal<br />
develo<br />
pment<br />
and<br />
Upgraded<br />
Server<br />
room<br />
Payment<br />
Procedure<br />
manual<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Number<br />
of Server<br />
rooms<br />
upgrade<br />
d<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
professio<br />
nal fees<br />
expende<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
procedur<br />
e<br />
manuals<br />
reviewed<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
5<br />
server<br />
rooms<br />
100%<br />
Profes<br />
sional<br />
fees<br />
paid<br />
32<br />
proce<br />
dure<br />
manu<br />
als<br />
5 Server<br />
rooms<br />
upgrade<br />
d<br />
100%<br />
professio<br />
nal fees<br />
expende<br />
d<br />
20<br />
Procedur<br />
e<br />
Manuals<br />
<strong>Review</strong>e<br />
d<br />
1 1 2 1 Exit<br />
Report<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
5 5 5 5 Signed<br />
-off<br />
Report<br />
R<br />
200<br />
000<br />
R<br />
900<br />
000<br />
R<br />
500<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration<br />
Public<br />
and<br />
Busines<br />
s<br />
confiden<br />
ce<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration
471<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
39/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
40/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Form<br />
Design<br />
Organisa<br />
tional<br />
Structure<br />
produc<br />
tivity<br />
Form<br />
Organogra<br />
m<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Number<br />
of forms<br />
develope<br />
d<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
review of<br />
the<br />
Organisa<br />
tional<br />
Structure<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2011/<br />
12<br />
Appro<br />
ved<br />
Organi<br />
sation<br />
al<br />
Struct<br />
ure<br />
10 forms<br />
develope<br />
d<br />
100%<br />
review of<br />
the<br />
Organisa<br />
tional<br />
Structure<br />
(1) Data<br />
gathering<br />
50%, (2)<br />
Draft<br />
Report<br />
25% (3)<br />
Approval<br />
25%<br />
1 3 3 3 Signed<br />
-off<br />
Forms<br />
50<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resoluti<br />
on<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration
472<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
41/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
42/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Culture<br />
Survey<br />
Job<br />
Evaluatio<br />
n<br />
Diversity<br />
Manageme<br />
nt<br />
graded<br />
jobs<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
culture<br />
survey<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
Percenta<br />
ge job<br />
evaluatio<br />
n<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
No<br />
baseli<br />
ne<br />
100%<br />
culture<br />
survey<br />
conducte<br />
d (1)<br />
Data<br />
gathering<br />
50%, (2)<br />
Draft<br />
Report<br />
25% (3)<br />
Approval<br />
25%<br />
100%<br />
Job<br />
evaluatio<br />
n<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
(1) Data<br />
gathering<br />
50%, (2)<br />
Draft<br />
Report<br />
25% (3)<br />
Approval<br />
25%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
0 25<br />
%<br />
0 25<br />
%<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resoluti<br />
on<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration<br />
Ensure<br />
Efficient<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
Municipa<br />
l<br />
Administ<br />
ration
473<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
43/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
44/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
45/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Legal<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Performa<br />
nce<br />
Manage<br />
ment<br />
Legal<br />
Matters<br />
Legislativ<br />
e <strong>Review</strong><br />
Updates<br />
To<br />
monito<br />
r<br />
perfor<br />
mance<br />
of staff<br />
below<br />
manag<br />
ers<br />
To<br />
provid<br />
e<br />
effectiv<br />
e and<br />
efficien<br />
t legal<br />
service<br />
s<br />
Performan<br />
ce<br />
commitme<br />
nts<br />
attended<br />
court<br />
cases<br />
legislative<br />
review<br />
reports<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
commitm<br />
ents<br />
conclude<br />
d<br />
Percenta<br />
ge court<br />
matters<br />
attended<br />
to<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
legislativ<br />
e review<br />
updates<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
level 4<br />
and 5<br />
signed<br />
perfor<br />
mance<br />
commi<br />
tments<br />
availa<br />
ble<br />
4<br />
legisla<br />
tive<br />
review<br />
s done<br />
100%<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
commitm<br />
ents<br />
conclude<br />
d<br />
100%<br />
court<br />
matter<br />
attended<br />
4<br />
legislativ<br />
e review<br />
updates<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Signed<br />
Perfor<br />
mance<br />
Commi<br />
tments<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
1 1 1 1 Legisla<br />
tive<br />
review<br />
report<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Public<br />
account<br />
ability<br />
Sustaina<br />
ble<br />
business<br />
operatio<br />
ns<br />
Sound<br />
administ<br />
ration
474<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
46/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
47/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
48/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Auxiliar<br />
y<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
File Plan<br />
Records<br />
Disposal<br />
Archives<br />
To<br />
provid<br />
e<br />
sound<br />
record<br />
s<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
system<br />
s<br />
file plan<br />
disposed<br />
records<br />
archived<br />
files<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
percenta<br />
ge file<br />
plan<br />
reviewed<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
records<br />
disposed<br />
percenta<br />
ge files<br />
archived<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
file<br />
plan<br />
inspec<br />
tion<br />
condu<br />
cted<br />
by<br />
provin<br />
cial<br />
archivi<br />
st<br />
archiv<br />
e<br />
registe<br />
r in<br />
place<br />
100% file<br />
plan<br />
reviewed<br />
100%<br />
records<br />
disposed<br />
100%<br />
files<br />
archived<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
quarter<br />
ly<br />
reports<br />
dispos<br />
al<br />
certific<br />
ate<br />
archive<br />
registe<br />
r<br />
R<br />
41<br />
960<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
Sound<br />
administ<br />
ration<br />
public<br />
account<br />
ability<br />
public<br />
account<br />
ability
475<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
49/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
50/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
51/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Fleet<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
Personn<br />
el File<br />
Audit<br />
Contract<br />
Manage<br />
ment(flee<br />
t and<br />
facilities)<br />
Fuel<br />
(Fleet)<br />
To<br />
provid<br />
e an<br />
effectiv<br />
e fleet<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
system<br />
audit<br />
report<br />
payments<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
personne<br />
l files<br />
audited<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
monitorin<br />
g of<br />
contracts<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
payment<br />
of fuel<br />
made<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
draft<br />
report<br />
in<br />
place<br />
contra<br />
ct in<br />
place<br />
ad hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
100%<br />
personne<br />
l files<br />
audited<br />
100%<br />
monitorin<br />
g fleet<br />
and<br />
facilities<br />
contracts<br />
monitore<br />
d (1)<br />
payment<br />
of<br />
contract<br />
fees<br />
(2)contra<br />
ctor<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
100%<br />
payment<br />
made<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
audit<br />
report<br />
perfor<br />
mance<br />
reports<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
R 7<br />
442<br />
293<br />
R 3<br />
165<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
public<br />
account<br />
ability<br />
public<br />
account<br />
ability<br />
public<br />
account<br />
ability
476<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
s<br />
ODT/0<br />
52/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
53/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
54/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Repairs<br />
and<br />
maintena<br />
nce (own<br />
vehicles)<br />
Licenses<br />
&<br />
subscript<br />
ions<br />
Tracking<br />
devices(<br />
vehicles)<br />
roadworthy<br />
vehicles<br />
paid<br />
licenses<br />
and<br />
subscriptio<br />
ns<br />
secured<br />
vehicles<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
vehicles<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintain<br />
ed<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
licenses<br />
and<br />
subscript<br />
ions paid<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
tracking<br />
devices<br />
installed<br />
and<br />
functiona<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
ad hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
ad hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
ad hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
100%<br />
vehicles<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintain<br />
ed (1)<br />
service<br />
register<br />
(2)servic<br />
e and<br />
repairs<br />
100%<br />
licenses<br />
and<br />
subscript<br />
ions paid<br />
100%<br />
tracking<br />
devices<br />
installed<br />
and<br />
functiona<br />
l<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Quarte<br />
rly<br />
Mainte<br />
nance<br />
Report<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
Functi<br />
onality<br />
certific<br />
ates<br />
R<br />
750<br />
000<br />
R<br />
95<br />
348<br />
R<br />
156<br />
341<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
public<br />
account<br />
ability<br />
public<br />
account<br />
ability<br />
public<br />
account<br />
ability
477<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
s<br />
l<br />
ODT/0<br />
55/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
56/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Faciliti<br />
es<br />
Fleet<br />
manage<br />
ment(ow<br />
n<br />
vehicles)<br />
Repairs<br />
&<br />
maintena<br />
nce<br />
(Building<br />
&<br />
equipme<br />
nt)<br />
To<br />
provid<br />
e<br />
effectiv<br />
e<br />
facilitie<br />
s<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
system<br />
roadworthy<br />
vehicles<br />
habitable<br />
buildings<br />
and<br />
functional<br />
equipment<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
percenta<br />
ge fleet<br />
register<br />
compiled<br />
and<br />
maintain<br />
ed<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
repairs<br />
and<br />
maintena<br />
nce on<br />
buildings<br />
and<br />
equipme<br />
nt done<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
ad hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
ad hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
100%<br />
fleet<br />
register<br />
compiled<br />
and<br />
maintain<br />
ed (1)<br />
service<br />
register<br />
(2)allocat<br />
ion<br />
schedule<br />
s<br />
100%<br />
repairs<br />
and<br />
maintena<br />
nce<br />
(1)maint<br />
enance<br />
plan<br />
(2)maint<br />
enance<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Quarte<br />
rly<br />
Fleet<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
report<br />
quarter<br />
ly state<br />
of<br />
buildin<br />
g and<br />
equip<br />
ment<br />
report<br />
R 2<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R<br />
300<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
public<br />
account<br />
ability<br />
Sustaina<br />
bility
478<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
57/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
58/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
59/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Lease/re<br />
ntal<br />
(offices)<br />
Lease/re<br />
ntal<br />
(office<br />
machine<br />
s)<br />
Garden<br />
and<br />
cleaning<br />
services<br />
paid<br />
leases/rent<br />
al (offices)<br />
paid<br />
leases/rent<br />
al(machine<br />
s)<br />
clean<br />
environme<br />
nt<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
lease/ren<br />
tal paid<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
lease/ren<br />
tal paid<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
garden<br />
and<br />
cleaning<br />
services<br />
paid<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
ad hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
ad hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
ad hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
100%<br />
lease/ren<br />
tal paid<br />
100%<br />
lease/ren<br />
tal paid<br />
100%<br />
garden<br />
and<br />
cleaning<br />
services<br />
paid<br />
(1)cleani<br />
ng and<br />
gardenin<br />
g<br />
services<br />
register<br />
(2)paym<br />
ent<br />
schedule<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
R 4<br />
600<br />
000<br />
R 3<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 2<br />
400<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
public<br />
account<br />
ability<br />
public<br />
account<br />
ability<br />
envirinm<br />
ental<br />
awarene<br />
ss
479<br />
(iii)<br />
Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTPUTS<br />
OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />
INP<br />
UTS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />
4<br />
TARGET<br />
S<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BU<br />
DG<br />
ET<br />
FU<br />
ND<br />
ER<br />
IMPACT<br />
S<br />
ODT/0<br />
60/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
ODT/0<br />
61/201<br />
3-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Office<br />
Equipme<br />
nt<br />
Furniture<br />
Equipme<br />
nt<br />
to<br />
provid<br />
e<br />
sound<br />
workin<br />
g<br />
enviro<br />
nment<br />
functional<br />
office<br />
equipment<br />
functional<br />
furniture<br />
equipment<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
reso<br />
urce<br />
s<br />
percenta<br />
ge office<br />
equipme<br />
nt<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintain<br />
ed<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
furniture<br />
equipme<br />
nt<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintain<br />
ed<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Corpo<br />
rate<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
ad hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
ad hoc<br />
report<br />
s<br />
100%<br />
office<br />
equipme<br />
nt<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintain<br />
ed<br />
100%<br />
furniture<br />
equipme<br />
nt<br />
repaired<br />
and<br />
maintain<br />
ed<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
quarter<br />
ly<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
report<br />
Quarte<br />
rly<br />
Mainte<br />
nance<br />
Report<br />
R<br />
220<br />
000<br />
R<br />
220<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
E-<br />
Sha<br />
re<br />
organisa<br />
tional<br />
sustaina<br />
bility<br />
organisa<br />
tional<br />
sustaina<br />
bility
480<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/00<br />
1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/00<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/00<br />
3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
(ACIP<br />
)<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Mahlakwena<br />
Village<br />
(Steelpoort)<br />
BWS - RO<br />
Flag Boshielo<br />
Water<br />
Conservation<br />
and Water<br />
Demand<br />
Management<br />
Burgersfort<br />
WWTW 7MI<br />
(Upgrading)<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
To<br />
provid<br />
e<br />
water<br />
and<br />
sanitati<br />
on to<br />
house<br />
holds<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
losses<br />
and<br />
improv<br />
ed<br />
pressu<br />
re<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
sanitat<br />
ion<br />
capaci<br />
ty<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
DWA<br />
Supp<br />
ort<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
0 121 0 12<br />
1<br />
50% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
60<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
75<br />
%<br />
80<br />
%<br />
- - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
- Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
- Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 3<br />
100<br />
000<br />
R 3<br />
500<br />
000<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
ACI<br />
P<br />
ACI<br />
P<br />
ACI<br />
P<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
service
481<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
BSD/00<br />
4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/00<br />
5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/00<br />
6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
(MIG)<br />
Marble Hall<br />
WWTW -<br />
Effluent Line<br />
Mooihoek<br />
Internal Bulk<br />
Bulk Pipeline<br />
to Lebalelo<br />
Central<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
sanitat<br />
ion<br />
capaci<br />
ty<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
5% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 20% -<br />
detailed<br />
designs<br />
approv<br />
ed<br />
=20%<br />
0% 20% -<br />
detailed<br />
designs<br />
approv<br />
ed<br />
5<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
R 6<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
500<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
080<br />
000<br />
ACI<br />
P<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
service<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
482<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
=20%<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
BSD/00<br />
7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/00<br />
8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/00<br />
9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Doubling of<br />
Mooihoek<br />
WTW<br />
Reservoirs in<br />
Lebalelo<br />
Central<br />
Connector<br />
Pipes to<br />
Lebalelo<br />
North<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
0% 20% -<br />
detailed<br />
designs<br />
approv<br />
ed<br />
=20%<br />
0% 20% -<br />
detailed<br />
designs<br />
approv<br />
ed<br />
=20%<br />
0% 20% -<br />
detailed<br />
designs<br />
approv<br />
ed<br />
=20%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
R 1<br />
050<br />
000<br />
R<br />
900<br />
000<br />
R<br />
660<br />
000<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
483<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/01<br />
0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/01<br />
1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/01<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Olifantspoort<br />
South<br />
Regional WS<br />
Scheme<br />
phase 6<br />
Nkadimeng<br />
BWS<br />
Carbonitites<br />
to Zaaiplaas<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
60% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
75<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
492 5000 0 0 50<br />
00<br />
50% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
60<br />
%<br />
70<br />
%<br />
- - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
- Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
- Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 10<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 24<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 15<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
484<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/01<br />
3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/01<br />
4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/01<br />
5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Jane Furse<br />
25ml<br />
command<br />
Reservoir(ph<br />
1C)<br />
Connector<br />
Pipes to<br />
Zaaiplaas<br />
Villages<br />
Groblersdal/L<br />
uckau Water<br />
Supply<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
90% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 10%(D<br />
esigns<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
50% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
- - - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
3<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
- - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 3<br />
200<br />
000<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 12<br />
794<br />
561<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
485<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/01<br />
6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/01<br />
7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/01<br />
8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Upgrading of<br />
Piet Gouws<br />
WTW<br />
Piet Gouws<br />
Bulk supply<br />
and storage<br />
Ga-<br />
Maphopha<br />
Command<br />
Reservoir<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
0% 50%(D<br />
esigns<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 20%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 20%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
20<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
30<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 4<br />
500<br />
000<br />
R<br />
750<br />
000<br />
R 4<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
486<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/01<br />
9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/02<br />
0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/02<br />
1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Steelpoort<br />
Valley<br />
Connector<br />
Pipeline<br />
Mphanama<br />
village<br />
connectors<br />
Gabaneng,<br />
Ga-Mmela<br />
Moutse BWS<br />
Phase<br />
(Counter<br />
funding)<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
0% 20%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 20%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
80%)<br />
N/A N/A 0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
5<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 4<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
0 MIG Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
487<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/02<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/02<br />
3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/02<br />
4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Ga-Nkwana<br />
Housing<br />
BWS<br />
Sekwati<br />
water supply<br />
project phase<br />
2 & 3<br />
Zaaiplaas<br />
Village<br />
Reticulations<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
50% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
75<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0 2980 0 29<br />
80<br />
0 1822 0 18<br />
22<br />
- - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
- - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
- - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 6<br />
200<br />
000<br />
R 7<br />
560<br />
000<br />
R 18<br />
650<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service
488<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/02<br />
5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/02<br />
6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/02<br />
7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Mooihoek<br />
Reticulation<br />
(Ga-Maroga,<br />
Mapea)<br />
Connector<br />
Pipes and<br />
reticulation to<br />
Lebalelo<br />
South<br />
Villages(Drie<br />
kop, Ga-<br />
Riba,<br />
Rivercross,<br />
Ga-Maeseng,<br />
Mandela and<br />
France)<br />
Ga-<br />
Maphopha,<br />
Ga-<br />
Malekana,<br />
Ga-Masha,<br />
Mapea<br />
Connector<br />
Pipes and<br />
Reticulation<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
0 20%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0 20%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0 50% -<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
5<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 2<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
489<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
service<br />
BSD/02<br />
8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/02<br />
9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Ga-Moloi<br />
Water<br />
Reticulation<br />
Solovo Water<br />
reticulation<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
0 50% -<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100% N/A N/<br />
A<br />
5<br />
%<br />
N/<br />
A<br />
20<br />
%<br />
N/<br />
A<br />
50<br />
%<br />
N/<br />
A<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
N/A<br />
R 2<br />
593<br />
739<br />
R<br />
200<br />
000<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service
490<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/03<br />
0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/03<br />
1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/03<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Lebalelo<br />
North Water<br />
Reticulation<br />
Ga-Nkwana<br />
Housing<br />
Water<br />
Reticulation<br />
Taung<br />
Reticulation<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
0 5%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0 2000 0 20<br />
00<br />
0 800 0 80<br />
0<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
- - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
- - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R<br />
600<br />
000<br />
R 2<br />
387<br />
000<br />
R <strong>23</strong><br />
080<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
MIG<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
N/A<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service
491<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/03<br />
3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/03<br />
4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/03<br />
5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Praktiseer<br />
Water Supply<br />
Mabotsha<br />
Water Supply<br />
Moteti B<br />
Water<br />
Reticulation<br />
(Zoetmelsfont<br />
ein)<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
0 4000 0 0 10<br />
00<br />
0 800 0 80<br />
0<br />
0 250 0 10<br />
0<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
40<br />
00<br />
Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
- - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
25<br />
0<br />
- Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 21<br />
720<br />
000<br />
R 7<br />
175<br />
000<br />
R 10<br />
900<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service
492<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/03<br />
6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/03<br />
7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/03<br />
8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Jane Furse<br />
Water<br />
Demand<br />
management<br />
Cost<br />
Recovery in<br />
Monsterlous,<br />
Motetema<br />
and Tafelkop<br />
Reservoir SB<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
losses<br />
and<br />
improv<br />
ed<br />
pressu<br />
re<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
Retrofi<br />
tting<br />
collap<br />
sing<br />
water<br />
servic<br />
es<br />
infrastr<br />
ucture<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
0% 20%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 5%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 1<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R<br />
450<br />
000<br />
R<br />
240<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
provisio<br />
n of<br />
basic<br />
service<br />
s to the<br />
residen<br />
ts of<br />
SDM<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
provisio<br />
n of<br />
basic<br />
service<br />
s to the<br />
residen<br />
ts of<br />
SDM<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
493<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
BSD/03<br />
9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/04<br />
0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Pipeline from<br />
Mooihoek to<br />
reservoir SB<br />
Bulk pipeline<br />
SB take off<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
0% 5%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 5%(De<br />
signs<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
R<br />
990<br />
000<br />
R<br />
500<br />
000<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
494<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/04<br />
1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/04<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/04<br />
3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Burgersfort<br />
WWTW 7MI<br />
(New plant )<br />
Burgersfort<br />
WWTW 7MI<br />
(refurbishme<br />
nt)<br />
Roosenekal<br />
WWTW<br />
Upgrade<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
sanitat<br />
ion<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
sanitat<br />
ion<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
sanitat<br />
ion<br />
supply<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
0% 5%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 100% -<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
20% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
0<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
0<br />
%<br />
80<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
- Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
- - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 24<br />
500<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
600<br />
000<br />
R 5<br />
868<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
service<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
service<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
service
495<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
BSD/04<br />
4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/04<br />
5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Apel Sewer<br />
WWTW<br />
VIP Backlog<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
sanitat<br />
ion<br />
supply<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
sanitat<br />
ion<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
0% 20% - -<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
0 38000 0 10<br />
00<br />
0<br />
10<br />
%<br />
25<br />
00<br />
0<br />
20<br />
%<br />
38<br />
00<br />
0<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R<br />
<strong>14</strong>7<br />
713<br />
000<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service
496<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/04<br />
6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/04<br />
7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/04<br />
8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SDM<br />
FUND<br />
ING<br />
(Capit<br />
al)<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Apel<br />
sanitation<br />
Tafelkop<br />
reticulation<br />
Borehole<br />
development<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
sanitat<br />
ion<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
borehole<br />
s<br />
develop<br />
ed<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
0 900 0 90<br />
0<br />
5% 30%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
5<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
5<br />
%<br />
- - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
10<br />
%<br />
30<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
<strong>14</strong> 15 3 6 9 15 Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 1<br />
654<br />
700<br />
R 30<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 5<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
MIG<br />
MIG<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service
497<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/04<br />
9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/05<br />
0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/05<br />
1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
RBIG<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Capital<br />
replacement/r<br />
efurbishment<br />
Mooihoek<br />
(Manoke &<br />
Dresden<br />
pipeline)<br />
Nebo Plateau<br />
Bulk Water<br />
Supply- Jane<br />
Furse-<br />
Marulaneng<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Retrofi<br />
tting<br />
collap<br />
sing<br />
water<br />
servic<br />
es<br />
infrastr<br />
ucture<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%expen<br />
diture<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
0% 100%<br />
(expen<br />
diture<br />
of<br />
allocati<br />
on)<br />
20% 80%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
50% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
25<br />
%<br />
30<br />
%<br />
60<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
60<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
80<br />
%<br />
Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
- Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 7<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 40<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 20<br />
285<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Reduce<br />
d<br />
interrup<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
service<br />
delivery<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
498<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/05<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/05<br />
3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/05<br />
4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Nebo Plateau<br />
Bulk Water<br />
Supply- Jane<br />
Furse to<br />
lobethal<br />
Ga-<br />
Malekana to<br />
Jane Furse<br />
pipeline<br />
Ga-Malekana<br />
WTW 36ml<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
50% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 20%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 5%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
60<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
75<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
- Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
20<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 24<br />
715<br />
000<br />
R 40<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 8<br />
911<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
499<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
BSD/05<br />
5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/05<br />
6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Moutse BWS<br />
(Project 7 to<br />
12 & 15)<br />
Moutse Bulk<br />
Water Supply<br />
(Project 1<br />
and 2)<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
5% 40%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
80% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
10<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
30<br />
%<br />
40<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
- - - Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
R 98<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 18<br />
200<br />
000<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
500<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/05<br />
7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/05<br />
8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/05<br />
9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Moutse BWS<br />
Phase 3,4,5<br />
Moutse BWS<br />
Project 13 &<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Magnet<br />
Heights to<br />
Schoonoord<br />
bulk pipeline<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Upgra<br />
ded<br />
bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
5% 50%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 50%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 30%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
10<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
25<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
15<br />
%<br />
40<br />
%<br />
30<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
30<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 70<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 31<br />
200<br />
000<br />
R 30<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
RBI<br />
G<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply
501<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
BSD/06<br />
0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/06<br />
1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
MWIG<br />
Ephraim<br />
Mogale<br />
Hotspots<br />
Projects<br />
Elias<br />
Motsoaledi<br />
Hotspots<br />
Projects<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
0% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
20<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
90<br />
%<br />
90<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
R 2<br />
891<br />
000<br />
R 9<br />
278<br />
000<br />
MWI<br />
G<br />
MWI<br />
G<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service
502<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/06<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/06<br />
3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/06<br />
4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Makhudutha<br />
maga<br />
Hotspots<br />
Projects<br />
Fetakgomo<br />
Hotspots<br />
Projects<br />
Greater<br />
Tubatse<br />
Hotspots<br />
Projects<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
0% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
0% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
20<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
90<br />
%<br />
90<br />
%<br />
90<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 3<br />
626<br />
000<br />
R<br />
376<br />
000<br />
R 13<br />
029<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
MWI<br />
G<br />
MWI<br />
G<br />
MWI<br />
G<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service
503<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
BSD/06<br />
5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/06<br />
6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
RTSI<br />
G<br />
(RRA<br />
MS)<br />
WSO<br />
G<br />
Rural Roads<br />
Asset<br />
Management<br />
Systems<br />
(RRAMS)<br />
Programme<br />
Community<br />
water supply<br />
for<br />
Mabopane &<br />
Moraleng<br />
To<br />
provid<br />
e data<br />
on<br />
road<br />
networ<br />
ks<br />
To<br />
refurbi<br />
sh<br />
water<br />
and<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
schem<br />
es<br />
Reduc<br />
ed<br />
water<br />
backlo<br />
gs<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
DWA<br />
Supp<br />
ort<br />
%<br />
completi<br />
on of<br />
activities<br />
in the<br />
annual<br />
impleme<br />
ntation<br />
plan<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
90% 100%<br />
(progre<br />
ss as<br />
per<br />
annual<br />
busines<br />
s plan)<br />
0% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Proje<br />
ct<br />
progr<br />
ess<br />
report<br />
Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
R 1<br />
781<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
000<br />
000<br />
DOT<br />
DW<br />
A<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
plannin<br />
g of<br />
roads<br />
infrastr<br />
ucture<br />
New<br />
connec<br />
tions to<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
and<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
service
504<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/06<br />
7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/06<br />
8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/06<br />
9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Replacement<br />
of dedicated<br />
line to Jane<br />
Furse<br />
Hospital<br />
Refurb&<br />
Upgrading of<br />
Hlogotlou<br />
WTW<br />
Refurb of<br />
Dennilton<br />
sewage<br />
pump station<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Retrofi<br />
tting<br />
collap<br />
sing<br />
water<br />
servic<br />
es<br />
infrastr<br />
ucture<br />
Retrofi<br />
tting<br />
collap<br />
sing<br />
water<br />
servic<br />
es<br />
infrastr<br />
ucture<br />
Retrofi<br />
tting<br />
collap<br />
sing<br />
water<br />
servic<br />
es<br />
infrastr<br />
ucture<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
DWA<br />
Supp<br />
ort<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
DWA<br />
Supp<br />
ort<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
DWA<br />
Supp<br />
ort<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
Completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
Completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
Completi<br />
on<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
5% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
5% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
5% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 1<br />
500<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
500<br />
000<br />
R 2<br />
200<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
DW<br />
A<br />
DW<br />
A<br />
DW<br />
A<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
water<br />
supply<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
service
505<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
80%)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
BSD/07<br />
0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/07<br />
1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Refurb of<br />
Motetema<br />
Sewer Pump<br />
stations and<br />
Network<br />
Refurb of<br />
Elandskraal<br />
sewage<br />
ponds<br />
Retrofi<br />
tting<br />
collap<br />
sing<br />
water<br />
servic<br />
es<br />
infrastr<br />
ucture<br />
Retrofi<br />
tting<br />
collap<br />
sing<br />
water<br />
servic<br />
es<br />
infrastr<br />
ucture<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
DWA<br />
Supp<br />
ort<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
DWA<br />
Supp<br />
ort<br />
%<br />
Completi<br />
on<br />
%<br />
Completi<br />
on<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
5% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
5% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
R 1<br />
300<br />
000<br />
R 3<br />
500<br />
000<br />
DW<br />
A<br />
DW<br />
A<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
service<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
service
506<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/07<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/07<br />
3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/07<br />
4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SDM<br />
FUND<br />
ING<br />
(opera<br />
tional)<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Penge<br />
(Upgrading of<br />
WWTW &<br />
WTW)<br />
Repairs and<br />
maintenance<br />
Electricity<br />
purchases<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
To<br />
provid<br />
e<br />
operati<br />
ons<br />
and<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
of<br />
water<br />
and<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
service<br />
s<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Retrofi<br />
tting<br />
collap<br />
sing<br />
water<br />
servic<br />
es<br />
infrastr<br />
ucture<br />
Ongoing<br />
operati<br />
on and<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
ESKO<br />
M<br />
claims<br />
submit<br />
ted for<br />
payme<br />
nt<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
DWA<br />
Supp<br />
ort<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
Completi<br />
on<br />
100%<br />
registere<br />
d<br />
incidenc<br />
es<br />
resolved<br />
within <strong>14</strong><br />
days<br />
%<br />
ESKOM<br />
claims<br />
received<br />
facilitate<br />
d<br />
submitte<br />
d within<br />
5 days<br />
of<br />
receipt<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
5% 100%<br />
(Design<br />
s<br />
approv<br />
ed =<br />
20%,<br />
Constru<br />
ction<br />
complet<br />
e =<br />
80%)<br />
80%<br />
approx<br />
Not<br />
determi<br />
ned<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
25<br />
%<br />
100% 80<br />
%<br />
100%<br />
(Claims<br />
receive<br />
d and<br />
submitt<br />
ed to<br />
BTO<br />
within 5<br />
days)<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
50<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
!00<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Com<br />
pletio<br />
n<br />
report<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 4<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 13<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 21<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
DW<br />
A<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed bulk<br />
sanitati<br />
on<br />
service<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
standar<br />
ds<br />
No<br />
interrup<br />
tions<br />
due to<br />
nonpayme<br />
nt of<br />
ESKO<br />
M bills
507<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/07<br />
5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/07<br />
6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/07<br />
7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Water<br />
purchases<br />
Fuel and<br />
lubricant<br />
purchases<br />
Agency<br />
services<br />
water (Elias)<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Water<br />
Purch<br />
ases<br />
claims<br />
submit<br />
ted for<br />
payme<br />
nt<br />
Fuel<br />
and<br />
lubrica<br />
nt<br />
claims<br />
submit<br />
ted for<br />
payme<br />
nt<br />
Ongoing<br />
operati<br />
on and<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
WSA<br />
Unit<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%Water<br />
purchas<br />
e claims<br />
received<br />
facilitate<br />
d<br />
submitte<br />
d within<br />
10 days<br />
of<br />
receipt<br />
% Fuel<br />
and<br />
Lubricati<br />
on<br />
claims<br />
received<br />
facilitate<br />
d<br />
submitte<br />
d within<br />
5 days<br />
of<br />
receipt<br />
%<br />
Complia<br />
nce with<br />
Service<br />
level<br />
agreeme<br />
nt<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Not<br />
determi<br />
ned<br />
Not<br />
determi<br />
ned<br />
Not<br />
determi<br />
ned<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
100%<br />
(Claims<br />
receive<br />
d and<br />
submitt<br />
ed to<br />
BTO<br />
within<br />
10<br />
days)<br />
100%<br />
(Claims<br />
receive<br />
d and<br />
submitt<br />
ed to<br />
BTO<br />
within 5<br />
days)<br />
100%<br />
(Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
SLA)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 52<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 3<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R<br />
400<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
standar<br />
ds<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
standar<br />
ds<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
standar<br />
ds
508<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/07<br />
8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/07<br />
9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/08<br />
0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Tankering<br />
Sewerage<br />
services -<br />
Repairs and<br />
maintenance<br />
Sewerage<br />
services -<br />
sucking of<br />
VIP toilets<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Ongoing<br />
operati<br />
on and<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
Ongoing<br />
operati<br />
on and<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
Ongoing<br />
operati<br />
on and<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
househo<br />
lds<br />
served<br />
through<br />
water<br />
tankers<br />
at least<br />
3 times<br />
a week<br />
100%<br />
registere<br />
d<br />
incidenc<br />
es<br />
resolved<br />
within <strong>14</strong><br />
days<br />
Number<br />
of toilets<br />
sucked<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
1000 1000 10<br />
00<br />
Not<br />
determi<br />
ned<br />
Not<br />
determi<br />
ned<br />
100% 10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
1000 25<br />
0<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
10<br />
00<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
50<br />
0<br />
10<br />
00<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
75<br />
0<br />
10<br />
00<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
00<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 1<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 4<br />
654<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
standar<br />
ds<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
standar<br />
ds<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
standar<br />
ds
509<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSD/08<br />
1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/08<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/08<br />
3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/08<br />
4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Agency<br />
services<br />
Sanitation<br />
(Elias)<br />
Agency<br />
services<br />
Sanitation<br />
(Ephraim)<br />
Laboratory<br />
and<br />
Chemicals<br />
Professional<br />
fees<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
To<br />
maintai<br />
n<br />
water<br />
quality<br />
within<br />
accept<br />
able<br />
limits<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
pruden<br />
t<br />
financi<br />
al<br />
manag<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Ongoing<br />
operati<br />
on and<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
Ongoing<br />
operati<br />
on and<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
Ongoing<br />
operati<br />
on and<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
Ongoing<br />
operati<br />
on and<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
%<br />
Complia<br />
nce with<br />
Service<br />
level<br />
agreeme<br />
nt<br />
%<br />
Complia<br />
nce with<br />
Service<br />
level<br />
agreeme<br />
nt<br />
% of<br />
availabili<br />
ty of<br />
chemical<br />
s<br />
%<br />
Complia<br />
nce with<br />
Service<br />
level<br />
agreeme<br />
nt<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Not<br />
determi<br />
ned<br />
Not<br />
determi<br />
ned<br />
Not<br />
determi<br />
ned<br />
Not<br />
determi<br />
ned<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
100%<br />
(Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
SLA)<br />
100%<br />
(Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
SLA)<br />
100%<br />
(availab<br />
ility of<br />
chemic<br />
als)<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100% 10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
Mont<br />
hly<br />
O&M<br />
statu<br />
s quo<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R<br />
<strong>14</strong>0<br />
000<br />
R 90<br />
000<br />
R 5<br />
300<br />
000<br />
R 2<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
standar<br />
ds<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
standar<br />
ds<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
standar<br />
ds<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with<br />
service<br />
level<br />
standar<br />
ds
510<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
ement<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
BSD/08<br />
5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
BSD/08<br />
6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
<strong>14</strong><br />
Transfer of<br />
taxi ranks to<br />
locals<br />
Infrastructure<br />
planning<br />
To<br />
enhan<br />
ce<br />
owners<br />
hip of<br />
local<br />
facilitie<br />
s<br />
To<br />
enhan<br />
ce<br />
forwar<br />
d<br />
plannin<br />
g<br />
Taxi<br />
ranks<br />
transfe<br />
rred to<br />
local<br />
munici<br />
palitie<br />
s<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
planni<br />
ng of<br />
water<br />
servic<br />
es<br />
deliver<br />
y<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Number<br />
of taxi<br />
ranks<br />
transferr<br />
ed<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
approve<br />
d Plans<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Infrast<br />
ructur<br />
e and<br />
Water<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
0 6 6 - - - Trans<br />
fer<br />
agree<br />
ment<br />
10 5 1 2 3 5 MON<br />
THLY<br />
PIU<br />
report<br />
R<br />
700<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
911<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
transpo<br />
rtation<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
implem<br />
entatio<br />
n of<br />
project<br />
s
511<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSDI/0<br />
87/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
BSDI/0<br />
88/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
Emerg<br />
ency<br />
Mana<br />
geme<br />
nt<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
EMS<br />
Maintenance<br />
Equipment<br />
Station<br />
uniform and<br />
protective<br />
clothing<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
To<br />
promot<br />
e<br />
sustain<br />
able<br />
EMS<br />
service<br />
s<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Reliabl<br />
e<br />
Equip<br />
ment<br />
Statio<br />
n<br />
unifor<br />
m and<br />
protect<br />
ive<br />
clothin<br />
g<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
repair,<br />
service<br />
and<br />
mainten<br />
ance of<br />
EMS<br />
equipme<br />
nt<br />
100%<br />
purchas<br />
e of<br />
station<br />
uniform<br />
and<br />
protectiv<br />
e<br />
clothing<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
no<br />
baselin<br />
e<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
purcha<br />
se of<br />
station<br />
uniform<br />
and<br />
protecti<br />
ve<br />
clothing<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
100%<br />
Repair,<br />
service<br />
and<br />
mainte<br />
nance<br />
of EMS<br />
equipm<br />
ent<br />
100%<br />
Purcha<br />
se of<br />
station<br />
uniform<br />
and<br />
protecti<br />
ve<br />
clothing<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Signe<br />
d-off<br />
Repo<br />
rt<br />
Deliv<br />
ery<br />
notes<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R25<br />
0<br />
000<br />
R80<br />
0<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
commu<br />
nity<br />
safety<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
commu<br />
nity<br />
safety<br />
BSDI/0<br />
89/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Disast<br />
er<br />
Mana<br />
geme<br />
nt<br />
Disaster relief<br />
material<br />
Provisi<br />
on of<br />
relief<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Disaster<br />
tents<br />
and<br />
blankets<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
purcha<br />
se of<br />
disaster<br />
materia<br />
l<br />
100%<br />
Purcha<br />
se of<br />
relief<br />
materia<br />
l as and<br />
when<br />
require<br />
d<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Deliv<br />
ery<br />
notes<br />
R48<br />
0<br />
000<br />
SD<br />
M<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
public<br />
confide<br />
nce
512<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSDI/0<br />
90/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
BSDI/0<br />
91/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Membership<br />
fees<br />
Emergency<br />
awareness<br />
campaigns<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
To<br />
promot<br />
e<br />
profes<br />
sional<br />
develo<br />
pment<br />
To<br />
enhan<br />
ce<br />
comm<br />
unity<br />
knowle<br />
dge<br />
base<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Paym<br />
ent<br />
Inform<br />
ed<br />
comm<br />
unity<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
Payment<br />
of<br />
member<br />
ship fees<br />
paid to<br />
professi<br />
onal<br />
bodies<br />
50<br />
emergen<br />
cy<br />
awarene<br />
ss<br />
campaig<br />
ns<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
payme<br />
nt of<br />
membe<br />
rship<br />
fees<br />
Numbe<br />
r of<br />
emerge<br />
ncy<br />
awaren<br />
ess<br />
campai<br />
gns<br />
held<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
100%<br />
Payme<br />
nt of<br />
membe<br />
rship<br />
fees<br />
20<br />
Emerge<br />
ncy<br />
awaren<br />
ess<br />
campai<br />
gns<br />
held<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
paym<br />
ent<br />
5 5 5 5 Exit<br />
Repo<br />
rt<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R50<br />
000<br />
R50<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Profess<br />
ional<br />
recogni<br />
tion<br />
Informe<br />
d public<br />
BSDI/0<br />
92/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Special<br />
operations<br />
high density<br />
day (Arrive<br />
Alive)<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Numbe<br />
r of<br />
Special<br />
Operati<br />
on High<br />
Density<br />
Day<br />
underta<br />
ken<br />
2<br />
Special<br />
Operati<br />
on High<br />
Density<br />
Day<br />
underta<br />
ken<br />
1 0 0 1 Exit<br />
Repo<br />
rt<br />
R19<br />
0<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
provisio<br />
n of<br />
basic<br />
service<br />
s to the<br />
residen<br />
ts of<br />
SDM
513<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSDI/0<br />
93/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
BSDI/0<br />
94/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
Munici<br />
pal<br />
Health<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
EMS Training<br />
Academy<br />
Air quality<br />
management<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
To<br />
develo<br />
p skills<br />
To<br />
promot<br />
e<br />
enviro<br />
nment<br />
al and<br />
person<br />
al<br />
health<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Operat<br />
ional<br />
materi<br />
al<br />
Promo<br />
te<br />
clean<br />
health<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
Air<br />
Quality<br />
and<br />
Weather<br />
monitori<br />
ng<br />
station<br />
installed<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
percent<br />
age<br />
purcha<br />
se of<br />
EMS<br />
acade<br />
my<br />
operati<br />
onal<br />
materia<br />
l<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
implem<br />
entatio<br />
n of Air<br />
Quality<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
plan<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
100%<br />
purcha<br />
se of<br />
EMS<br />
acade<br />
my<br />
operati<br />
onal<br />
materia<br />
l<br />
100%<br />
Implem<br />
entatio<br />
n of air<br />
quality<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
plan (1)<br />
Tender<br />
process<br />
25% (2)<br />
Commi<br />
ssionin<br />
g 25%<br />
(3)<br />
Monitor<br />
ing<br />
50%<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
purch<br />
ase<br />
State<br />
of Air<br />
Qualit<br />
y<br />
Repo<br />
rt<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R<br />
130<br />
000<br />
R 1<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Skills<br />
develo<br />
pment<br />
Clean<br />
environ<br />
ment
5<strong>14</strong><br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSDI/0<br />
95/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
MHS<br />
Awareness<br />
Programme<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Inform<br />
ed<br />
stakeh<br />
olders<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
MHS<br />
awaren<br />
ess<br />
progra<br />
mme<br />
conduct<br />
ed<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
100%<br />
MHS<br />
awaren<br />
ess<br />
progra<br />
mme<br />
conduct<br />
ed (1)<br />
stakeho<br />
lder<br />
mobilis<br />
ation<br />
50%(2)<br />
implem<br />
entatio<br />
n 50%<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Exit<br />
Repo<br />
rt<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 80<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Clean<br />
enviro<br />
nment
515<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSDI/0<br />
96/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
HIV/AIDS<br />
Strategy<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Incide<br />
nce<br />
reducti<br />
on<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
number<br />
of<br />
initiativ<br />
es<br />
conduct<br />
ed for<br />
HIV/AI<br />
DS<br />
strateg<br />
y<br />
implem<br />
entatio<br />
n<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
4<br />
Initiativ<br />
es<br />
conduct<br />
ed for<br />
HIV/AI<br />
DS<br />
strateg<br />
y<br />
implem<br />
entatio<br />
n<br />
(1)worl<br />
d AIDS<br />
day (2)<br />
Candle<br />
light (3)<br />
SDI<br />
condo<br />
m week<br />
(4) TB<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
0 1 3 1 Exit<br />
Repo<br />
rt<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R<br />
500<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS
516<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSDI/0<br />
97/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
BSDI/0<br />
98/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Health<br />
Council<br />
Talafatsa<br />
<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Apprai<br />
sal of<br />
MEC<br />
on<br />
health<br />
matter<br />
s<br />
Trees<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
support<br />
to<br />
district<br />
health<br />
council<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
establis<br />
hment<br />
of<br />
nursery<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
100%<br />
Support<br />
to<br />
district<br />
health<br />
council<br />
(1)<br />
logistic<br />
al<br />
support<br />
50%(2)<br />
agenda<br />
s and<br />
reports<br />
50%<br />
100%<br />
Establis<br />
hment<br />
(1)<br />
specific<br />
ations<br />
for<br />
indigen<br />
ous<br />
trees<br />
20% (2)<br />
procure<br />
ment<br />
and<br />
distribut<br />
e to<br />
locals<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
60<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
Exit<br />
Repo<br />
rt<br />
Exit<br />
Repo<br />
rt<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 20<br />
000<br />
R<br />
100<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
health<br />
Protec<br />
ted<br />
enviro<br />
nment
517<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
60%<br />
(3)moni<br />
toring<br />
20%<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
BSDI/0<br />
99/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-<strong>14</strong><br />
MHS<br />
Equipment<br />
Equip<br />
ment<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Percent<br />
age<br />
purcha<br />
se<br />
MHS<br />
equipm<br />
ent<br />
100%<br />
Purcha<br />
se<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
purch<br />
ase<br />
R 50<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
Condu<br />
cive<br />
enviro<br />
nment<br />
for<br />
operati<br />
ons
518<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSDI/1<br />
00/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
Sport<br />
Devel<br />
opme<br />
nt<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Executive<br />
Mayors<br />
Marathon<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Health<br />
y<br />
lifestyl<br />
e<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Numbe<br />
r of<br />
Executi<br />
ve<br />
Mayor's<br />
Marath<br />
on held<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
1 1 0 0 0 Exit<br />
Repo<br />
rt<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R<br />
100<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS<br />
Health<br />
y<br />
lifestyl<br />
e<br />
BSDI/1<br />
01/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
BSDI/1<br />
02/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
BSDI/1<br />
03/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
BSDI/1<br />
04/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Sports<br />
, Art<br />
and<br />
Cultur<br />
e<br />
Devel<br />
opme<br />
nt<br />
Executive<br />
Mayors Cup<br />
Executive<br />
Mayor's Cup<br />
Sports<br />
Academy<br />
Tournament<br />
for Aged<br />
To<br />
promot<br />
e mass<br />
particip<br />
ation in<br />
sports<br />
arts<br />
and<br />
culture<br />
Health<br />
y<br />
lifestyl<br />
e<br />
Hum<br />
an<br />
and<br />
Fina<br />
ncial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Executiv<br />
e<br />
Mayor's<br />
cup,<br />
Tournam<br />
ent for<br />
the<br />
Aged,<br />
Support<br />
to all<br />
codes,<br />
Heritage<br />
and<br />
cultural<br />
show,<br />
Languag<br />
e<br />
promotio<br />
n,<br />
Capacity<br />
building<br />
were<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Numbe<br />
r of<br />
initiativ<br />
es to<br />
support<br />
sports<br />
arts<br />
and<br />
culture<br />
develop<br />
ment<br />
conduct<br />
ed<br />
6<br />
Initiativ<br />
es<br />
3 2 1 0 Exit<br />
Repo<br />
rt<br />
R<br />
946<br />
912<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
social<br />
cohesi<br />
on and<br />
improv<br />
ed<br />
lifestyl<br />
es
519<br />
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />
OUTCOME :<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
BSDI/1<br />
05/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
BSDI/1<br />
06/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
BSDI/1<br />
07/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-20<strong>14</strong><br />
BSDI/1<br />
08/<strong>2013</strong><br />
-<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGI<br />
C<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJECTS<br />
Support to all<br />
sports Codes<br />
Heritage and<br />
Cultural<br />
Show<br />
Language<br />
Promotion<br />
Arts and<br />
Culture<br />
Capacity<br />
Building<br />
OBJE<br />
CTIVE<br />
S<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFR<br />
OMANC<br />
E<br />
INDICA<br />
TORS<br />
undertak<br />
en in<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
Direct<br />
or<br />
Comm<br />
unity<br />
Servic<br />
es<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARGE<br />
TS<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />
ENC<br />
E<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPA<br />
CTS
520<br />
LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA3 : LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
LED/00<br />
1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
LED/00<br />
2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
LED/00<br />
3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Strategi<br />
c<br />
Projects<br />
LOCAL<br />
ECONO<br />
MIC<br />
DEVELO<br />
PMENT<br />
Sub<br />
Projects<br />
Small<br />
Business<br />
Seminar<br />
SMME/Co<br />
operative<br />
support<br />
Market<br />
exhibition<br />
s<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
To<br />
conduc<br />
t<br />
semina<br />
rs for<br />
small<br />
busines<br />
ses<br />
To<br />
provide<br />
support<br />
to<br />
SMME'<br />
s and<br />
cooper<br />
atives<br />
To<br />
provide<br />
platfor<br />
m for<br />
SMME'<br />
s<br />
exhibiti<br />
ons<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
inform<br />
ed<br />
busin<br />
esses<br />
increa<br />
sed<br />
produ<br />
ctivity<br />
marke<br />
ting<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
financia<br />
l<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
PERFROM<br />
ANCE<br />
INDICATO<br />
RS<br />
Number of<br />
business<br />
seminars<br />
conducted<br />
Number of<br />
SMME's/Co<br />
operatives<br />
supported<br />
with<br />
production<br />
inputs and<br />
equipment<br />
Number of<br />
SMME's<br />
exposed to<br />
market<br />
exhibitions<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
Initiativ<br />
es with<br />
busine<br />
sses<br />
held in<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
20<br />
SMME<br />
's<br />
suppor<br />
ted<br />
LED<br />
Strate<br />
gy<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
5<br />
busine<br />
ss<br />
semina<br />
rs held<br />
5<br />
SMME'<br />
s<br />
/Coope<br />
ratives<br />
support<br />
ed with<br />
product<br />
ion<br />
inputs<br />
and<br />
equipm<br />
ent<br />
4<br />
SMME'<br />
s<br />
expose<br />
d to<br />
market<br />
exhibiti<br />
ons<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVID<br />
ENCE<br />
3 2 0 0 Exit<br />
Repor<br />
ts<br />
1 2 2 0 Exit<br />
Repor<br />
ts<br />
0 2 2 0 Exit<br />
Repor<br />
ts<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R60<br />
0,00<br />
0<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Local<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment
521<br />
LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA3 : LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
Strategi<br />
c<br />
Projects<br />
Sub<br />
Projects<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFROM<br />
ANCE<br />
INDICATO<br />
RS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASE<br />
LINES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q<br />
4<br />
EVID<br />
ENCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Job<br />
Creation<br />
Reports<br />
To<br />
generat<br />
e<br />
reports<br />
on job<br />
creatio<br />
n<br />
Repor<br />
t<br />
HUMA<br />
N AND<br />
FINAN<br />
CIAL<br />
RESO<br />
URCE<br />
S<br />
Number of<br />
reports on<br />
municipal<br />
job creation<br />
generated<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
4<br />
reports<br />
4<br />
reports<br />
1 1 1 1 Quart<br />
erly<br />
report<br />
s<br />
E-<br />
shar<br />
e<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS
522<br />
GGPP/001/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/002/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/003/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/004/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/005/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Internal<br />
Audit<br />
Performa<br />
nce Audit<br />
Regularity<br />
Audit<br />
ICT<br />
Audits<br />
3 Year<br />
rolling<br />
plan<br />
Adhoc<br />
Assignme<br />
nts<br />
To<br />
assess<br />
and<br />
evaluate<br />
municipal<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
informati<br />
on<br />
To<br />
review<br />
Internal<br />
controls<br />
To<br />
evaluate<br />
and<br />
improve<br />
the<br />
effective<br />
ness of<br />
ICT<br />
controls<br />
To<br />
develop<br />
three<br />
year<br />
rolling<br />
internal<br />
audit<br />
plan<br />
To<br />
perform<br />
ad hoc<br />
assignm<br />
ents as<br />
requeste<br />
d by<br />
council<br />
and<br />
manage<br />
ment<br />
Perform<br />
ance<br />
Report<br />
Control<br />
Environ<br />
ment<br />
ICT<br />
Audit<br />
Reports<br />
Three<br />
[3] year<br />
and<br />
Annual<br />
Internal<br />
Audit<br />
Plan<br />
Ad Hoc<br />
Reports<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
Performa<br />
nce Audit<br />
reports<br />
issued<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
regularity<br />
audit<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of ICT<br />
Audit<br />
report<br />
issued<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
review of<br />
the<br />
Three<br />
year and<br />
Annual<br />
IA Plan<br />
Percenta<br />
ge Ad<br />
Hoc<br />
Reports<br />
issued<br />
N<br />
Chief<br />
Audit<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Chief<br />
Audit<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Chief<br />
Audit<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Chief<br />
Audit<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Chief<br />
Audit<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
4<br />
Perform<br />
ance<br />
Audit<br />
reports<br />
issued<br />
25<br />
Regular<br />
ity<br />
audits<br />
issued<br />
1 ICT<br />
Audit<br />
report<br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Three<br />
year<br />
and<br />
Annual<br />
IA Plan<br />
Seven<br />
[7] Ad<br />
Hoc<br />
Reports<br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
4<br />
Performan<br />
ce Audit<br />
reports<br />
28<br />
Regularity<br />
audits<br />
4 ICT Audit<br />
reports<br />
100%<br />
review of<br />
Three year<br />
and Annual<br />
IA plan<br />
100% Ad<br />
Hoc<br />
Reports<br />
1 1 1 1 Perfor<br />
mance<br />
audit<br />
reports<br />
6 8 8 6 Interna<br />
l audit<br />
reports<br />
1 1 1 1 ICT<br />
Audit<br />
reports<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Audit<br />
Commi<br />
ttee<br />
Approv<br />
al<br />
Ad<br />
Hoc<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
R1<br />
000<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability
5<strong>23</strong><br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/006/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/007/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/008/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/009/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
Audit<br />
Fees<br />
External<br />
Audit<br />
Committe<br />
e<br />
IA<br />
Electronic<br />
System<br />
Operation<br />
Clean<br />
Audit<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
To<br />
facilitate<br />
payment<br />
of auditor<br />
general<br />
South<br />
Africa<br />
To<br />
coordinat<br />
e<br />
activities<br />
of audit<br />
committe<br />
e<br />
To<br />
procure<br />
electroni<br />
c internal<br />
audit<br />
working<br />
paper<br />
system<br />
To<br />
monitor<br />
attendan<br />
ce to AG<br />
Matters<br />
towards<br />
clean<br />
audit<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
Paymen<br />
t<br />
Process<br />
ed<br />
Adminis<br />
tration<br />
Support<br />
Audit<br />
Softwar<br />
e<br />
Complia<br />
nce<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
payment<br />
facilitatio<br />
n for<br />
Auditor-<br />
General<br />
South<br />
Africa<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
Facilitati<br />
on of AC<br />
activities<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
Procure<br />
ment of<br />
IA<br />
Electroni<br />
c System<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
monitorin<br />
g to<br />
attendan<br />
ce to AG<br />
Matters<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Chief<br />
Audit<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Chief<br />
Audit<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Chief<br />
Audit<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Chief<br />
Audit<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
100%<br />
paymen<br />
t<br />
process<br />
ed<br />
Six[6]<br />
Meeting<br />
s<br />
Facilitat<br />
ed<br />
No<br />
Baselin<br />
e<br />
OPCA<br />
steering<br />
committ<br />
ee<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
100%<br />
payment<br />
facilitation<br />
100%<br />
Facilitation<br />
1. Agendas<br />
and<br />
Minutes<br />
[50%] 2.<br />
Compile<br />
AC<br />
Reports<br />
[50%]<br />
100%<br />
Procureme<br />
nt<br />
100%<br />
monitoring<br />
(1) AG<br />
action plan<br />
(2) AFS<br />
Preparatio<br />
n plans (3)<br />
Audit File<br />
(4) IA<br />
Implement<br />
ation Plan<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Proof<br />
of<br />
payme<br />
nt<br />
AC<br />
Agend<br />
as<br />
Electro<br />
nic<br />
Syste<br />
m<br />
Purcha<br />
sed<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 3<br />
300<br />
000<br />
R<br />
500<br />
000<br />
R20<br />
0<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Busine<br />
ss<br />
confide<br />
nce<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
busine<br />
ss<br />
proces<br />
ses<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability
524<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/010/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/011/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/012/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/013/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
IGR<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
MMs<br />
Office<br />
Mayor’s<br />
Office<br />
Speakers<br />
Office<br />
Communit<br />
y Services<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
To foster<br />
intergove<br />
rnmental<br />
relations<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
benchm<br />
arking<br />
and<br />
knowled<br />
ge<br />
sharing<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
to<br />
support<br />
IGR<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
All<br />
Directo<br />
rs<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Quarterl<br />
y IGR<br />
Cluster<br />
s<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
4 1 1 1 1 reports<br />
and<br />
minute<br />
s<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R10<br />
0<br />
000<br />
R25<br />
000<br />
R10<br />
000<br />
R 50<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Improv<br />
ed IGR<br />
GGPP/0<strong>14</strong>/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/015/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
PED R 10<br />
000<br />
CPS R 20<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
GGPP/016/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/017/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
BTO R 50<br />
000<br />
IWS<br />
INTERNA<br />
L<br />
CONTRO<br />
L<br />
Internal<br />
control<br />
controlle<br />
d<br />
environ<br />
ment<br />
human<br />
and<br />
financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
impleme<br />
ntation of<br />
internal<br />
control<br />
measure<br />
s<br />
All<br />
Directo<br />
rs<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
SDBIP<br />
100%<br />
implement<br />
ation of<br />
internal<br />
control<br />
measures<br />
(1)leave<br />
(2)travellin<br />
g<br />
(3)overtime<br />
(4)austerity<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
signed<br />
off<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
R10<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability
525<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/018/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/019/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/020/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/021/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/022/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
OPERA<br />
TION<br />
CLEAN<br />
AUDIT<br />
Risk<br />
Manage<br />
ment<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
Internal<br />
audit<br />
findings<br />
External<br />
audit<br />
findings<br />
Risk<br />
Managem<br />
ent<br />
Risk<br />
assessme<br />
nts<br />
risk<br />
monitorin<br />
g<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
to assess<br />
efficiency<br />
and<br />
effective<br />
ness of<br />
controls<br />
to<br />
address<br />
AG<br />
findings<br />
To<br />
assess<br />
institution<br />
al risks<br />
To<br />
appraise<br />
the<br />
institution<br />
on risks<br />
To<br />
monitor<br />
risk<br />
mitigatio<br />
n<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
Internal<br />
audit<br />
report<br />
External<br />
audit<br />
report<br />
Risk<br />
manage<br />
ment<br />
Report<br />
identifie<br />
d risks<br />
risks<br />
mitigate<br />
d<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
internal<br />
audit<br />
findings<br />
resolved<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
external<br />
audit<br />
findings<br />
addresse<br />
d<br />
percenta<br />
ge risk<br />
manage<br />
ment<br />
issues<br />
resolved<br />
Percenta<br />
ge risk<br />
assessm<br />
ent<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
monitorin<br />
g of risks<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Chief<br />
Audit<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
All<br />
Directo<br />
rs<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Internal<br />
audit<br />
implem<br />
entation<br />
plan<br />
AG<br />
action<br />
plan<br />
Risk<br />
assess<br />
ment<br />
report<br />
Risk<br />
register<br />
s<br />
Risk<br />
register<br />
s<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
100% 10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100% 10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100% 10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100% risk<br />
assessmen<br />
t<br />
conducted(<br />
1)strategic<br />
20%(2)x8<br />
operational<br />
80%<br />
100%<br />
monitoring<br />
of<br />
risks(1)qua<br />
rterly<br />
reports<br />
operational<br />
, processes<br />
and<br />
strategic<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
Risk<br />
Regist<br />
ers<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
R 0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
R 0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
R 0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
sustain<br />
able<br />
busine<br />
ss<br />
operati<br />
ons<br />
sustain<br />
able<br />
busine<br />
ss<br />
operati<br />
ons
526<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/0<strong>23</strong>/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/024/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/025/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
Project<br />
risk<br />
assessme<br />
nt<br />
Asset<br />
Insurance<br />
Security<br />
operation<br />
s<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
to<br />
identify<br />
risks<br />
To<br />
safeguar<br />
d the<br />
assets of<br />
SDM<br />
through<br />
alternativ<br />
e<br />
techniqu<br />
es of risk<br />
transfer<br />
To<br />
safeguar<br />
d SDM<br />
assets,<br />
its<br />
employe<br />
es and<br />
visitors<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
identifie<br />
d risks<br />
Fully<br />
insured<br />
assets<br />
Safegua<br />
rded<br />
Assets<br />
and<br />
employe<br />
es and<br />
visitors<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Financi<br />
al and<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Financi<br />
al and<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
projects<br />
risks<br />
assesses<br />
Percenta<br />
ge of<br />
assets<br />
coverage<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
reduction<br />
in<br />
security<br />
related<br />
incidents<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
projects<br />
docume<br />
nts<br />
insuran<br />
ce<br />
policy<br />
contract<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
Security<br />
Contrac<br />
t<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
100%<br />
projects<br />
risks<br />
assessed<br />
for<br />
sampled<br />
projects<br />
100%<br />
coverage<br />
of<br />
insurable<br />
assets<br />
100%<br />
Safeguard<br />
ed Assets<br />
and<br />
employees<br />
and visitors<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
1 Insura<br />
nce<br />
Policy<br />
Contra<br />
cts<br />
/Sched<br />
ule<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Securit<br />
y<br />
Contra<br />
ct<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 3<br />
000<br />
000<br />
R 17<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
sustain<br />
able<br />
busine<br />
ss<br />
operati<br />
ons<br />
Sustai<br />
nable<br />
Servic<br />
e<br />
Deliver<br />
y<br />
Sustai<br />
nable<br />
Servic<br />
e<br />
Deliver<br />
y and<br />
safe<br />
workin<br />
g<br />
environ<br />
ment
527<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/026/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/027/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
Security<br />
Vetting<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
To<br />
ascertain<br />
the level<br />
of<br />
integrity<br />
of staff<br />
and<br />
service<br />
providers<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
Reduce<br />
d<br />
vulnera<br />
bility<br />
Reduce<br />
d<br />
vulnera<br />
bility<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
impleme<br />
ntation of<br />
vetting<br />
process<br />
for staff<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
impleme<br />
ntation of<br />
vetting<br />
process<br />
for<br />
service<br />
providers<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Security<br />
Policy<br />
Security<br />
Policy<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
100%<br />
Implement<br />
ation of<br />
vetting<br />
process for<br />
staff (1)<br />
Distribution<br />
of vetting<br />
forms-staff<br />
25% (2)<br />
Submissio<br />
n to SSA<br />
25% (3)<br />
Vetting<br />
50%<br />
100%<br />
Implement<br />
ation of<br />
vetting<br />
process for<br />
service<br />
providers<br />
(1)<br />
Develop<br />
terms of<br />
reference<br />
(2)<br />
Procureme<br />
nt of the<br />
system (3)<br />
Subscriptio<br />
n (4)<br />
Vetting<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
25<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Signed<br />
-off<br />
Vetting<br />
report<br />
Signed<br />
-off<br />
Vetting<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Risk<br />
Free<br />
operati<br />
onal<br />
environ<br />
ment<br />
Risk<br />
Free<br />
operati<br />
onal<br />
environ<br />
ment
528<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/028/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/029/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
Anti-<br />
Fraud and<br />
Corruptio<br />
n Hotline<br />
Business<br />
continuity<br />
Managem<br />
ent<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
To stamp<br />
out fraud<br />
and<br />
corruptio<br />
n<br />
activities<br />
To<br />
secure<br />
business<br />
sustaina<br />
bility<br />
(SDM)<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
Reduce<br />
d<br />
vulnera<br />
bility<br />
Resilien<br />
t<br />
Busines<br />
s<br />
Operati<br />
on<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
impleme<br />
ntation of<br />
Anti-<br />
Fraud<br />
and<br />
Corruptio<br />
n Hotline<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
develop<br />
ment<br />
business<br />
continuit<br />
y<br />
manage<br />
ment<br />
plan<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Approv<br />
ed Anti-<br />
Fraud<br />
and<br />
Corrupti<br />
on<br />
Policy<br />
Approv<br />
ed<br />
busines<br />
s<br />
continui<br />
ty<br />
framew<br />
ork<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
100%<br />
Implement<br />
ation Anti-<br />
Fraud and<br />
Corruption<br />
Policy (1)<br />
Tender<br />
Process<br />
25% (2)<br />
Contracting<br />
25% (3)<br />
Awareness<br />
25% (4)<br />
Hotline<br />
25%<br />
100%<br />
developme<br />
nt business<br />
continuity<br />
manageme<br />
nt plan (1)<br />
Business<br />
impact<br />
analysis<br />
25% (2)<br />
Developme<br />
nt of<br />
strategies<br />
25% (3)<br />
Consolidati<br />
on 25% (4)<br />
Draft Plan<br />
25%<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
Hotline R 80<br />
000<br />
Signed<br />
-off<br />
Busine<br />
ss<br />
Contin<br />
uity<br />
Plan<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Public<br />
confide<br />
nce<br />
Sustai<br />
nable<br />
Busine<br />
ss<br />
Operati<br />
ons
529<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/030/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/031/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/032/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/033/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
Special<br />
Program<br />
mes<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
Risk<br />
Managem<br />
ent<br />
Awarenes<br />
s Training<br />
Risk<br />
Managem<br />
ent<br />
Reporting<br />
Excess on<br />
insurance<br />
Youth<br />
Developm<br />
ent<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
To raise<br />
risk<br />
manage<br />
ment<br />
awarene<br />
ss<br />
amongst<br />
staff and<br />
councillor<br />
s<br />
To<br />
coordinat<br />
e and<br />
report on<br />
risk<br />
manage<br />
ment<br />
activities<br />
To<br />
manage<br />
claim<br />
incidents<br />
that<br />
demand<br />
excess<br />
To<br />
integrate<br />
youth in<br />
the<br />
socioeconomi<br />
c<br />
mainstre<br />
am<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
Risk<br />
Averse<br />
culture/<br />
work<br />
environ<br />
ment<br />
Report<br />
Indemni<br />
fied<br />
losses<br />
Integrat<br />
ed<br />
Youth<br />
Develop<br />
ment<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
resourc<br />
e<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
for risk<br />
awarene<br />
ss<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
reports<br />
on risk<br />
manage<br />
ment<br />
generate<br />
d<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
insuranc<br />
e excess<br />
processe<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of youth<br />
initiatives<br />
undertak<br />
en.<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
Chief<br />
Risk<br />
Officer<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Risk<br />
awaren<br />
ess<br />
training<br />
module<br />
identifie<br />
d<br />
Three<br />
(3)<br />
Reports<br />
100%<br />
Insuran<br />
ce<br />
excess<br />
paid<br />
2012/20<br />
13 - 3<br />
youth<br />
initiative<br />
s held<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
2 initiatives<br />
(1) Officials<br />
(2)<br />
Councillors<br />
Four (4)<br />
Risk<br />
Manageme<br />
nt Reports<br />
100%<br />
Insurance<br />
excess<br />
processed<br />
3 - Youth<br />
activities.<br />
(1). Career<br />
exhibition<br />
(2). Youth<br />
Economic<br />
Summit (3)<br />
Film<br />
Making<br />
Project.<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
0 1 0 1 Exit<br />
Report<br />
1 1 1 1 Signed<br />
-Off<br />
Risk<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Claims<br />
Recor<br />
ds<br />
0 1 1 1 Exit<br />
report<br />
and<br />
conce<br />
pt<br />
docum<br />
ent<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
R<br />
500<br />
000<br />
R30<br />
0<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Sustai<br />
nable<br />
Busine<br />
ss<br />
Operati<br />
ons<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Accou<br />
ntabilit<br />
y<br />
Sustai<br />
nable<br />
Busine<br />
ss<br />
Operati<br />
ons<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Youth<br />
Conditi<br />
ons
530<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/034/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/035/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>020<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/036/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/037/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
Children<br />
Developm<br />
ent<br />
Aged<br />
Advocacy<br />
Program<br />
me<br />
Program<br />
me for<br />
people<br />
living with<br />
disability<br />
Women<br />
and<br />
gender<br />
programm<br />
e<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
To<br />
provide<br />
support<br />
and<br />
advocacy<br />
on<br />
children's<br />
rights<br />
and their<br />
welfare<br />
Ensure<br />
adequate<br />
caring<br />
and<br />
protectio<br />
n of the<br />
elderly<br />
To<br />
impleme<br />
nt<br />
program<br />
mes for<br />
people<br />
living<br />
with<br />
disabilitie<br />
s<br />
To<br />
provide<br />
support<br />
and<br />
advocacy<br />
on<br />
women<br />
and<br />
gender<br />
develop<br />
ment<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
Integrat<br />
ed<br />
Children<br />
Develop<br />
ment<br />
Integrat<br />
ed<br />
Aged<br />
Advoca<br />
cy<br />
Progra<br />
mme<br />
Integrat<br />
ed<br />
Progra<br />
mme for<br />
people<br />
living<br />
with<br />
disabilit<br />
y<br />
Integrat<br />
ed<br />
Women<br />
and<br />
gender<br />
program<br />
me<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
children'<br />
s<br />
initiatives<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of Aged<br />
initiatives<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
for<br />
people<br />
living<br />
with<br />
disability<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertak<br />
en for<br />
women<br />
and<br />
gender<br />
develop<br />
ment<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
2012/20<br />
13 2<br />
Childre<br />
n<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
2012/20<br />
13 3<br />
Aged<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
2012/20<br />
13 4<br />
People<br />
living<br />
with<br />
disabilit<br />
y<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
2012/20<br />
13 2<br />
women<br />
and<br />
gender<br />
develop<br />
ment<br />
initiative<br />
s<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
2 -<br />
Children<br />
initiatives.(<br />
1) National<br />
Children’s<br />
Day (2)<br />
Take a girl<br />
child to<br />
work<br />
3 - (1) x2<br />
Mandela<br />
Day (2) x1<br />
Internation<br />
al Older<br />
Persons<br />
Day<br />
4 - (1) Eye<br />
care (2)<br />
Deaf<br />
awareness<br />
(3)<br />
Disability<br />
(4)<br />
Mental/Brai<br />
lle and<br />
awareness<br />
3 - (1)<br />
Women’s'<br />
Month<br />
Launch (2)<br />
Fun Walk<br />
(3)<br />
Internation<br />
al<br />
women’s<br />
day<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
0 1 0 1 Exit<br />
report<br />
and<br />
conce<br />
pt<br />
docum<br />
ent<br />
2 1 0 0 Exit<br />
report<br />
and<br />
conce<br />
pt<br />
docum<br />
ent<br />
1 2 1 0 Exit<br />
report<br />
and<br />
conce<br />
pt<br />
docum<br />
ent<br />
2 0 1 0 Exit<br />
report<br />
and<br />
conce<br />
pt<br />
docum<br />
ent<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R15<br />
0<br />
000<br />
R25<br />
0<br />
000<br />
R20<br />
0<br />
000<br />
R30<br />
0<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Childre<br />
n<br />
Conditi<br />
ons<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Aged<br />
Conditi<br />
ons<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
People<br />
living<br />
with<br />
disabili<br />
ty<br />
Conditi<br />
ons<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
women<br />
and<br />
gender<br />
Conditi<br />
ons
531<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/038/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/039/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/040/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
Commu<br />
nications<br />
and<br />
media<br />
relations<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
Moral<br />
Regenera<br />
tion<br />
movemen<br />
t<br />
Executive<br />
Support<br />
Traditiona<br />
l<br />
Leadershi<br />
p,<br />
Mayoral<br />
Committe<br />
e, Support<br />
to families<br />
Stakehold<br />
er<br />
engagem<br />
ent<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
To forge<br />
strong<br />
and<br />
sustaina<br />
ble civil<br />
society<br />
partnersh<br />
ips on<br />
constituti<br />
onal<br />
values<br />
To<br />
provide<br />
partnersh<br />
ip and<br />
support<br />
to<br />
Magoshi<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
improved<br />
communi<br />
cation<br />
with<br />
internal<br />
and<br />
external<br />
stakehol<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
Integrat<br />
ed<br />
Society<br />
Integrat<br />
ed<br />
Support<br />
Engage<br />
d<br />
stakehol<br />
der<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
HUMA<br />
N AND<br />
FINACI<br />
AL<br />
RESO<br />
URCE<br />
S<br />
HUMA<br />
N AND<br />
FINACI<br />
AL<br />
RESO<br />
URCE<br />
S<br />
HUMA<br />
N AND<br />
FINACI<br />
AL<br />
RESO<br />
URCE<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
revival of<br />
MRM<br />
Committ<br />
ee<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
support<br />
to<br />
Tradition<br />
al<br />
Leadersh<br />
ip,<br />
Mayoral<br />
Committ<br />
ee,<br />
Support<br />
to<br />
families<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
for<br />
stakehol<br />
ders<br />
engagem<br />
ent<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
No<br />
Baselin<br />
e<br />
2012/20<br />
13 x<strong>14</strong><br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
Consult<br />
ations<br />
2012/20<br />
13 x10<br />
Family<br />
burial<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
100% (1)<br />
revival<br />
MRM<br />
Committee<br />
(50%) (2)<br />
MRM<br />
policy<br />
(25%) (3)<br />
MRM<br />
Programm<br />
e (25%0<br />
100%<br />
Support (1)<br />
Traditional<br />
leaders<br />
(25%) (2)<br />
Mayoral<br />
Committee<br />
(25%) (3)<br />
Vulnerable<br />
Families<br />
(50%)<br />
Eight (8)<br />
Stakeholde<br />
r<br />
engageme<br />
nt<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
50<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resolut<br />
ion<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
2 2 2 2 Exit<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R50<br />
000<br />
R50<br />
0<br />
000<br />
R 3<br />
220<br />
272<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Social<br />
cohesi<br />
on<br />
Social<br />
cohesi<br />
on<br />
Public<br />
Accou<br />
ntabilit<br />
y
532<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/041/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/042/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/043/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
Newslette<br />
r<br />
Marketing<br />
and<br />
branding<br />
Strategic<br />
events<br />
Customer<br />
Satisfactio<br />
n survey<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
ders<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
integrate<br />
d<br />
marketin<br />
g of the<br />
district<br />
Provide<br />
strategic<br />
support<br />
to<br />
Executiv<br />
e Mayor,<br />
enhance<br />
social<br />
cohesion<br />
and<br />
nation<br />
building<br />
To<br />
conduct<br />
a study<br />
on<br />
customer<br />
satisfacti<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
Newslet<br />
ter<br />
Brand<br />
Exposur<br />
e<br />
Integrat<br />
ed<br />
Society<br />
Level of<br />
Custom<br />
er<br />
satisfact<br />
ion<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
newslett<br />
ers<br />
issued<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
initiatives<br />
for<br />
Marketin<br />
g and<br />
branding<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
for<br />
strategic<br />
events<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
customer<br />
satisfacti<br />
on<br />
survey<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong> 4<br />
Newslet<br />
ter<br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Draft<br />
Marketi<br />
ng and<br />
Brandin<br />
g<br />
Strateg<br />
y<br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
2<br />
strategi<br />
c<br />
events<br />
No<br />
Baselin<br />
e<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
8<br />
Newsletter<br />
s (1) x4<br />
Internal (2)<br />
x4 External<br />
100%<br />
initiatives<br />
for<br />
Marketing<br />
and<br />
Branding<br />
(1)<br />
Buildings<br />
(25%) (2)<br />
Events<br />
(50%) (3)<br />
Promotiona<br />
l (25%)<br />
3 - (1)<br />
Heritage<br />
(2)<br />
Excellence<br />
Award (3)<br />
Golf Day<br />
100%<br />
customer<br />
satisfaction<br />
survey (1)<br />
TOR (10%)<br />
(2)<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
2 2 2 2 Newsl<br />
etter<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
1 1 1 0 Exit<br />
report<br />
and<br />
conce<br />
pt<br />
docum<br />
ent<br />
10<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
0 70<br />
%<br />
Custo<br />
mer<br />
satisfa<br />
ction<br />
survey<br />
(Repor<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R<br />
437<br />
342.<br />
25<br />
R 1<br />
200<br />
000<br />
R 50<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Inform<br />
ed<br />
Public<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Publicit<br />
y<br />
Social<br />
cohesi<br />
on<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
public<br />
confide<br />
nce
533<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
on<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Mayor<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
Procureme<br />
nt (20%)(3)<br />
Report<br />
(70%)<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
t)<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
GGPP/044/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/045/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/046/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/047/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Council<br />
Support<br />
Batho<br />
Pele<br />
event<br />
Internatio<br />
nal<br />
relations<br />
Oversight<br />
visits<br />
Implemen<br />
tation of<br />
Council<br />
Activities<br />
To<br />
comply<br />
with<br />
service<br />
standard<br />
s<br />
To foster<br />
internatio<br />
nal<br />
relations<br />
To<br />
maximise<br />
accounta<br />
bility<br />
To<br />
rationalis<br />
e council<br />
activities<br />
Service<br />
conscie<br />
ntisation<br />
Benchm<br />
arking<br />
Oversig<br />
ht<br />
Reports<br />
Annual<br />
Council<br />
Calenda<br />
r<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Number<br />
of Batho<br />
Pele<br />
initiatives<br />
undertak<br />
en<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
Internatio<br />
nal<br />
relations<br />
fostered<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
initiatives<br />
employe<br />
d to<br />
support<br />
oversight<br />
visits/ope<br />
rations<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
compilati<br />
on of<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Office<br />
of the<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Secret<br />
ariat<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Secret<br />
ariat<br />
2012-<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Batho<br />
Pele<br />
Event<br />
2012 -<br />
<strong>2013</strong><br />
Draft<br />
Internati<br />
onal<br />
policy<br />
1 - Batho<br />
Pele Event<br />
100%<br />
Internation<br />
al relations<br />
1. As per<br />
Political<br />
directives<br />
6 visits 100%<br />
(1) Previsits/<br />
Research<br />
25%) (2)<br />
Research<br />
Report<br />
25% (3)<br />
Admin.<br />
Support<br />
25% (4)<br />
Exit Report<br />
25%)<br />
2012/13<br />
Council<br />
calenda<br />
r<br />
100%<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />
Council<br />
Calendar<br />
0 1 0 0 Exit<br />
report<br />
and<br />
conce<br />
pt<br />
docum<br />
ent<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Exit<br />
report<br />
and<br />
conce<br />
pt<br />
docum<br />
ent<br />
Comp<br />
osite<br />
Oversi<br />
ght<br />
reports<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Resolu<br />
tion<br />
R 50<br />
000<br />
R 50<br />
000<br />
R<br />
500<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
public<br />
confide<br />
nce<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Servic<br />
e<br />
Deliver<br />
y<br />
Stakeh<br />
older<br />
satisfa<br />
ction<br />
Inform<br />
ed<br />
Public
534<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
calendar<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
council<br />
calendar<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
GGPP/048/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/049/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Public<br />
Participa<br />
tion<br />
Policy<br />
Developm<br />
ent and/or<br />
review<br />
Council<br />
Outreach<br />
es<br />
To<br />
maximise<br />
complian<br />
ce and<br />
uniformit<br />
y<br />
To<br />
maximise<br />
accounta<br />
bility<br />
Policies<br />
<strong>Review</strong><br />
ed<br />
Exit<br />
Report<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
policies<br />
reviewed<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
employe<br />
d to<br />
support<br />
council<br />
outreach<br />
es<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Secret<br />
ariat<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Secret<br />
ariat<br />
2012/13<br />
policies<br />
(6)<br />
Five (5)<br />
policies(Pu<br />
blic<br />
Participatio<br />
n, Petition,<br />
Ward<br />
Committee<br />
Incentives,<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
Ward<br />
Committee<br />
s Forum,<br />
<strong>District</strong><br />
MPAC)<br />
Two (2)<br />
initiatives<br />
(1) Draft<br />
Annual<br />
Report (2)<br />
Draft<br />
<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget<br />
(Stakehold<br />
er<br />
identificatio<br />
n,<br />
Logistical<br />
Support,<br />
Exit<br />
Reports)<br />
2 1 1 1 Counci<br />
l<br />
Resolu<br />
tion<br />
0 0 2 0 Counci<br />
l<br />
Resolu<br />
tion<br />
0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
R<br />
395<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Public<br />
Accou<br />
ntabilit<br />
y<br />
Public<br />
Accou<br />
ntabilit<br />
y
535<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/050/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/051/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/052/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/053/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/054/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
Ward<br />
Committe<br />
es<br />
Service<br />
Delivery<br />
Engagem<br />
ents<br />
Budget<br />
Speech<br />
Declaratio<br />
n of<br />
Councillor<br />
s interests<br />
Councillor<br />
s Welfare<br />
Training<br />
of<br />
Councillor<br />
s<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
To<br />
provide<br />
conduciv<br />
e<br />
environm<br />
ent for<br />
councillor<br />
functioni<br />
ng<br />
To<br />
provide<br />
ammuniti<br />
on for<br />
councillor<br />
s<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
Reports<br />
Budget<br />
Speech<br />
Event<br />
Complia<br />
nce<br />
Complia<br />
nce<br />
Skills<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
engagem<br />
ents held<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
facilitatio<br />
n for<br />
budget<br />
speech<br />
event<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
councillo<br />
rs<br />
declarati<br />
ons<br />
processe<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
employe<br />
d for<br />
councillo<br />
rs<br />
welfare<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
councillo<br />
rs trained<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Secret<br />
ariat<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Secret<br />
ariat<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Secret<br />
ariat<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Secret<br />
ariat<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Secret<br />
ariat<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Two (2)<br />
engage<br />
ments<br />
held<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
Two (2)<br />
engageme<br />
nts<br />
100% 100%<br />
(Stakehold<br />
er<br />
mobilisatio<br />
n 50%,<br />
logistical<br />
preparation<br />
s 50%)<br />
49 49<br />
Councillors<br />
declaration<br />
forms<br />
processed<br />
1 1 (Income<br />
Tax Act)<br />
49<br />
councill<br />
ors<br />
trained<br />
49<br />
councillors<br />
trained<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
0 1 0 1 Counci<br />
l<br />
Report<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Resolu<br />
tion<br />
49 0 0 0 Certifie<br />
d<br />
Declar<br />
ation<br />
Forms<br />
0 1 0 0 Attend<br />
ance<br />
Regist<br />
er and<br />
Report<br />
21 21 18 11 Trainin<br />
g<br />
report<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R<br />
300<br />
000<br />
R<br />
350<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
R<br />
350<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Public<br />
Accou<br />
ntabilit<br />
y<br />
Public<br />
Accou<br />
ntabilit<br />
y<br />
Public<br />
Transp<br />
arency<br />
Public<br />
Accou<br />
ntabilit<br />
y<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Servic<br />
e<br />
Deliver<br />
y
536<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
operation<br />
s<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
GGPP/055/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/<br />
Geograph<br />
ic Name<br />
Change<br />
Tracking<br />
of council<br />
resolution<br />
s<br />
To<br />
restore<br />
Nation<br />
identity<br />
to track<br />
council<br />
resolutio<br />
ns<br />
Nationh<br />
ood<br />
identity<br />
resolutio<br />
ns<br />
register<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
employe<br />
d to<br />
coordinat<br />
e<br />
Geograp<br />
hic<br />
Name<br />
Change<br />
process<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
tracking<br />
of<br />
council<br />
resolutio<br />
ns<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Secret<br />
ariat<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Secret<br />
ariat<br />
GNC<br />
Commit<br />
tee<br />
establis<br />
hed,<br />
GNC<br />
Policy<br />
approve<br />
d by<br />
council,<br />
GNC<br />
worksh<br />
op<br />
conduct<br />
ed<br />
No<br />
Baselin<br />
e<br />
Two (2)<br />
initiatives<br />
(1)<br />
Renaming<br />
of<br />
Burgersfort<br />
Town (2)<br />
Naming of<br />
DeHoop<br />
Dam<br />
100%<br />
tracking of<br />
council<br />
resolutions<br />
(1)<br />
resolutions<br />
register (2)<br />
progress<br />
on<br />
implement<br />
ation<br />
1 0 1 0 GNC<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Resolu<br />
tions<br />
Regist<br />
er<br />
R<br />
130<br />
800<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Public<br />
Accou<br />
ntabilit<br />
y<br />
improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability
537<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/056/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/057/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/058/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
Perform<br />
ance<br />
Manage<br />
ment<br />
System<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
PMS<br />
Framewor<br />
k<br />
Performa<br />
nce<br />
Agreemen<br />
ts<br />
<strong>Review</strong>s/<br />
Appraisal<br />
s<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
To<br />
enhance<br />
institution<br />
al<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
culture<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
PMS<br />
Policy<br />
and<br />
framew<br />
ork<br />
Signed<br />
perform<br />
ance<br />
agreem<br />
ents<br />
reviewe<br />
d<br />
perform<br />
ance<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
<strong>Review</strong><br />
of PMS<br />
Framewo<br />
rk<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
commitm<br />
ents<br />
conclude<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
performa<br />
nce<br />
reviews<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
PMS<br />
Policy<br />
and<br />
Framew<br />
ork<br />
signed<br />
section<br />
56<br />
perform<br />
ance<br />
agreem<br />
ents<br />
2<br />
reviews<br />
conduct<br />
ed<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
100%<br />
review of<br />
PMS<br />
Framework<br />
(1) draft<br />
framework<br />
(25%) (2)<br />
staff<br />
comments<br />
(25%)(3)<br />
manageme<br />
nt<br />
comments<br />
(25%)(4)<br />
approval(2<br />
5%)<br />
100%<br />
performanc<br />
e<br />
agreement<br />
s<br />
concluded<br />
(1)Director<br />
s<br />
(2)manage<br />
rs<br />
2<br />
performanc<br />
e reviews<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
25<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
25<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resolut<br />
ion<br />
Signed<br />
perfor<br />
mance<br />
commi<br />
tments<br />
1 1 0 0 Signed<br />
off<br />
perfor<br />
mance<br />
review<br />
s<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R<br />
200<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability
538<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/059/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/060/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/061/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
Institution<br />
al SDBIP<br />
Departme<br />
ntal<br />
SDBIP<br />
Annual<br />
Report<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
To<br />
maximise<br />
accounta<br />
bility and<br />
transpare<br />
ncy to<br />
stakehol<br />
ders<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
SDBIP<br />
Depart<br />
mental<br />
SDBIP<br />
annual<br />
reportin<br />
g<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
institutio<br />
nal<br />
SDBIP<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
Departm<br />
ental<br />
SDBIP<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
compilati<br />
on of<br />
annual<br />
report<br />
2012/201<br />
3<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
SDBIP<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
Depart<br />
mental<br />
SDBPI<br />
2011/20<br />
12<br />
annual<br />
report<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
100%<br />
developme<br />
nt of<br />
institutional<br />
SDBIP (1)<br />
Working<br />
sessions<br />
with<br />
department<br />
s 50%(2)<br />
draft<br />
institutional<br />
SDBIP<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />
50%<br />
100%<br />
developme<br />
nt of<br />
Departmen<br />
tal SDBIP<br />
(1) working<br />
sessions<br />
with<br />
department<br />
s 50% (2)<br />
draft<br />
department<br />
al SDBIP's<br />
50%<br />
100%<br />
compilation<br />
of annual<br />
report<br />
2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />
(1)data<br />
collection<br />
30%(2)draf<br />
t annual<br />
report<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
30<br />
%<br />
Signed<br />
off<br />
SDBIP<br />
by<br />
Execut<br />
ive<br />
Mayor<br />
Signed<br />
off<br />
depart<br />
mental<br />
SDBIP<br />
's<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resolut<br />
ion<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability
539<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
50%(3)<br />
submission<br />
to council<br />
20%<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
GGPP/062/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/063/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
Integrate<br />
d<br />
Develop<br />
ment<br />
Plan<br />
Complian<br />
ce<br />
Reporting<br />
Project<br />
site visits<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
Framewor<br />
k<br />
To<br />
undertak<br />
e<br />
projects<br />
site visits<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
Integrate<br />
d<br />
Develop<br />
ment<br />
Planning<br />
complia<br />
nce<br />
reportin<br />
g<br />
site<br />
reports<br />
coordin<br />
ated<br />
planning<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
complian<br />
ce<br />
reports<br />
submitte<br />
d<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
projects<br />
site visits<br />
conducte<br />
d<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
compilati<br />
on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />
Framewo<br />
rk<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
20<br />
complia<br />
nce<br />
reports<br />
No<br />
Baselin<br />
e<br />
2012/20<br />
12<br />
process<br />
plan<br />
20<br />
compliance<br />
reports<br />
(1)x4LGTA<br />
S<br />
(2)x4MTAS<br />
(3)x8<br />
monthly<br />
(4) x4<br />
quarterly<br />
4 projects<br />
site visits<br />
conducted<br />
5 5 5 5 Signed<br />
off<br />
reports<br />
1 1 1 1 signed<br />
off<br />
reports<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resolut<br />
ion<br />
R<br />
800<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
improv<br />
ed<br />
accoun<br />
tability<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
alignm<br />
ent<br />
and<br />
coordin<br />
ation
540<br />
GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />
NO.<br />
GGPP/064/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
GGPP/065/<br />
<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRAT<br />
EGIC<br />
PROJE<br />
CTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJEC<br />
TS<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
Process<br />
Plan<br />
<strong>Review</strong>s<br />
OBJECT<br />
IVES<br />
OUTPU<br />
TS<br />
Process<br />
plan<br />
<strong>Review</strong><br />
ed <strong>IDP</strong><br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
human<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
financi<br />
al<br />
resourc<br />
es<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
percenta<br />
ge<br />
compilati<br />
on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />
Process<br />
plan<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
review of<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIA<br />
N<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
BASEL<br />
INE<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
2012/20<br />
13<br />
Process<br />
plan<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />
<strong>14</strong> <strong>IDP</strong><br />
<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGET<br />
ANNUAL<br />
TARGETS<br />
100%<br />
compilation<br />
of <strong>IDP</strong><br />
Process<br />
plan<br />
100%<br />
<strong>Review</strong> of<br />
<strong>IDP</strong> (1)<br />
Status quo<br />
report<br />
40%(2)<br />
draft <strong>IDP</strong><br />
40%(3)<br />
Adoption<br />
20%<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
0<br />
%<br />
40<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
40<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
council<br />
resolut<br />
ion<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resolut<br />
ion<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
alignm<br />
ent<br />
and<br />
coordin<br />
ation<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
alignm<br />
ent<br />
and<br />
coordin<br />
ation<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNU<br />
AL<br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS
541<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
FV/001<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
FV/002<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
Treasu<br />
ry<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
Budget<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
Capital<br />
Replac<br />
ement<br />
reserv<br />
e<br />
Budget<br />
prepar<br />
ation<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
sufficien<br />
t<br />
reserve<br />
funds to<br />
address<br />
asset<br />
renewal<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
prepara<br />
tion and<br />
implem<br />
entation<br />
of<br />
realistic<br />
budget<br />
for the<br />
municip<br />
ality<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Ringfenced<br />
cash<br />
backe<br />
d fund<br />
Credibl<br />
e<br />
Budget<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Financi<br />
al and<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
Improve<br />
ment in<br />
capital<br />
replacem<br />
ent<br />
reserve<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
realistic<br />
and<br />
credible<br />
budget<br />
prepared<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
Budget<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
(0%)<br />
Budget<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
(0%)<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNU<br />
AL<br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
8%<br />
improv<br />
ement<br />
in<br />
capital<br />
replace<br />
ment<br />
reserve<br />
(R7<br />
000<br />
000)<br />
100%<br />
realisti<br />
c and<br />
credibl<br />
e<br />
budget<br />
prepar<br />
ed<br />
(1)<br />
Cash<br />
backed<br />
30%<br />
(2)<br />
Timelin<br />
ess<br />
30%<br />
(3)<br />
Amend<br />
ments<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
2%<br />
R1<br />
698<br />
000<br />
3<br />
%<br />
R2<br />
65<br />
1<br />
00<br />
0<br />
0% 0<br />
%<br />
3<br />
%<br />
R2<br />
65<br />
1<br />
00<br />
0<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Report<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
Resolu<br />
tion<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R 7<br />
000<br />
000<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
R 0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Viability<br />
for<br />
infrastr<br />
ucture<br />
sustain<br />
ability<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Viability<br />
for<br />
service<br />
delivery
542<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNU<br />
AL<br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
made<br />
(X2)<br />
40%<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
FV/003<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Operat<br />
ion<br />
Clean<br />
Audit<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Audit<br />
opinio<br />
n<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
improve<br />
d audit<br />
opinion<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
Audit<br />
Opinio<br />
n<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
improve<br />
ment of<br />
audit<br />
opinion<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
Disclai<br />
mer<br />
audit<br />
100%<br />
improv<br />
ement<br />
of audit<br />
opinion<br />
1.<br />
Addres<br />
sing<br />
prior<br />
year<br />
audit<br />
issues<br />
(50%)<br />
2.<br />
Strengt<br />
hening<br />
internal<br />
control<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Qualifi<br />
ed<br />
Audit<br />
Opinio<br />
n<br />
R<br />
331<br />
644<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Public<br />
confide<br />
nce
543<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNU<br />
AL<br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
s<br />
(50%)<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
FV/004<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Asset<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
Asset<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
that<br />
asset<br />
and<br />
inventor<br />
y are<br />
adequat<br />
ely<br />
account<br />
ed for,<br />
properly<br />
recorde<br />
d and<br />
safegua<br />
rded<br />
Compli<br />
ant<br />
Fixed<br />
Asset<br />
Regist<br />
er<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Percenta<br />
ge GRAP<br />
complian<br />
t fixed<br />
asset<br />
register<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
Movabl<br />
e asset<br />
register<br />
100%<br />
GRAP<br />
compli<br />
ant<br />
asset<br />
register<br />
(Unbun<br />
dled<br />
Assets<br />
30%,<br />
Safegu<br />
arding<br />
movabl<br />
e and<br />
immov<br />
able<br />
assets<br />
20%,<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Fixed<br />
Asset<br />
Regist<br />
er<br />
R 6<br />
890<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Effectiv<br />
e and<br />
efficient<br />
service<br />
delivery
544<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNU<br />
AL<br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
dispos<br />
als<br />
10%,<br />
valuati<br />
on<br />
30%,<br />
records<br />
keepin<br />
g 10%)<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
FV/005<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Invent<br />
ory<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
(Store<br />
s and<br />
Materi<br />
al)<br />
Invent<br />
ory<br />
Regist<br />
er<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
updated<br />
inventory<br />
register<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
50%<br />
complia<br />
nt<br />
invento<br />
ry<br />
register<br />
80%<br />
update<br />
d<br />
invento<br />
ry<br />
register<br />
(purch<br />
ases<br />
30%,<br />
valuati<br />
on<br />
20%,<br />
dispos<br />
als 5%,<br />
record<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Update<br />
d<br />
Invent<br />
ory<br />
Regist<br />
er<br />
R 1<br />
300<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Enhanc<br />
ed<br />
revenu<br />
e<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
(Reven<br />
ue and<br />
asset<br />
manag<br />
ement)
545<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNU<br />
AL<br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
keepin<br />
g 10%,<br />
safegu<br />
arding<br />
15%)<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
FV/006<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Expen<br />
diture<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
Docum<br />
ent<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
prudent<br />
expendi<br />
ture<br />
manage<br />
ment<br />
Safegu<br />
arded<br />
Docum<br />
ents<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
documen<br />
ts<br />
scanned<br />
and filed<br />
as per<br />
process<br />
plan<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
hard<br />
copies<br />
of<br />
docum<br />
ents<br />
100%<br />
docum<br />
ents<br />
scanne<br />
d and<br />
filed as<br />
per<br />
proces<br />
s plan<br />
(electro<br />
nic<br />
filing<br />
50%,<br />
manual<br />
filing<br />
50%)<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Electro<br />
nic<br />
Report<br />
on<br />
scanne<br />
d<br />
docum<br />
ents<br />
R0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Sound<br />
financia<br />
l<br />
manag<br />
ement
546<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
FV/007<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
FV/008<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
Expen<br />
diture<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
Reven<br />
ue<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
(Cost<br />
Recov<br />
ery)<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
proper<br />
manage<br />
ment of<br />
docume<br />
nts<br />
to<br />
ensure<br />
accurat<br />
e and<br />
complet<br />
e<br />
reportin<br />
g of<br />
financial<br />
informat<br />
ion<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Accura<br />
te and<br />
timely<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
Credibl<br />
e<br />
Custo<br />
mer<br />
Datab<br />
ase<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
HUMA<br />
N<br />
RESO<br />
URCE<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge of<br />
creditors<br />
reconcile<br />
d and<br />
paid<br />
within 30<br />
days of<br />
invoice<br />
date<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
consume<br />
r and<br />
indigent<br />
data<br />
collected<br />
and<br />
cleansed<br />
for five<br />
(5)<br />
areas/vill<br />
ages<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
annual<br />
expend<br />
iture<br />
reconcil<br />
iations<br />
financia<br />
l<br />
system<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNU<br />
AL<br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
100%<br />
creditor<br />
s and<br />
paid<br />
within<br />
30<br />
days of<br />
invoice<br />
(reconc<br />
iliation<br />
50%<br />
and<br />
payme<br />
nts<br />
50%)<br />
100%<br />
consu<br />
mer<br />
and<br />
indigen<br />
t data<br />
collect<br />
ed and<br />
cleans<br />
ed for<br />
five (5)<br />
areas<br />
(Data<br />
collecti<br />
on<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0% 50<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Report<br />
Indige<br />
nt<br />
Regist<br />
er<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
R0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
R0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Public<br />
and<br />
busines<br />
s<br />
confide<br />
nce<br />
Enhanc<br />
ed<br />
revenu<br />
e<br />
manag<br />
ement
547<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNU<br />
AL<br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
50%,<br />
indigen<br />
t<br />
register<br />
50%)<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
FV/009<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Reven<br />
ue<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
Reven<br />
ue<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
sufficien<br />
t<br />
revenue<br />
to<br />
address<br />
develop<br />
ment<br />
imperati<br />
ves.<br />
Increa<br />
sed<br />
collecti<br />
on<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
revenue<br />
collected<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
58%<br />
collecti<br />
on rate<br />
40%<br />
revenu<br />
e<br />
collect<br />
ed<br />
(R15<br />
076<br />
959)<br />
Q1.<br />
R897<br />
600<br />
Q2. R4<br />
501<br />
600<br />
Q3. R2<br />
<strong>23</strong>5<br />
200<br />
Q4. R7<br />
2<br />
%<br />
12<br />
%<br />
6<br />
%<br />
20<br />
%<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Report<br />
R 8<br />
477<br />
000<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Viability
548<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNU<br />
AL<br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
442<br />
592<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
FV/010<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Supply<br />
Chain<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
Dema<br />
nd<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
the<br />
optimu<br />
m,<br />
efficient<br />
,<br />
effectiv<br />
e<br />
function<br />
al<br />
Effecti<br />
ve and<br />
efficien<br />
t<br />
procur<br />
ement<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
develop<br />
ment of<br />
procurem<br />
ent plans<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
Budget<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
(0%)<br />
100%<br />
develo<br />
pment<br />
of<br />
procur<br />
ement<br />
plans<br />
(procur<br />
ement<br />
plans)<br />
0<br />
%<br />
0% 0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Procur<br />
ement<br />
plans<br />
for all<br />
depart<br />
ments<br />
R0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
service<br />
delivery
549<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
FV/011<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
FV/012<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
Acquis<br />
ition<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
Contra<br />
ct<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
procure<br />
ment<br />
process<br />
es<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
efficient<br />
and<br />
effectiv<br />
e<br />
contract<br />
manage<br />
ment<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Supply<br />
Chain<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
Credibl<br />
e<br />
contra<br />
ct<br />
registe<br />
r<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
reduction<br />
of<br />
irregular<br />
expendit<br />
ure from<br />
baseline<br />
Percenta<br />
ge SLA's<br />
available<br />
and<br />
updated<br />
on the<br />
contract<br />
register<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
AG<br />
Finding<br />
s on<br />
expend<br />
iture<br />
irregula<br />
rities<br />
50%<br />
update<br />
d<br />
contrac<br />
t<br />
register<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNU<br />
AL<br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
100%<br />
reducti<br />
on of<br />
irregula<br />
r<br />
expend<br />
iture<br />
from<br />
baselin<br />
e<br />
(adher<br />
ence to<br />
full<br />
SCM<br />
policies<br />
and<br />
regulati<br />
ons<br />
100%)<br />
100%<br />
availab<br />
le and<br />
update<br />
d<br />
contrac<br />
t<br />
register<br />
(draftin<br />
g of<br />
SLA<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
100<br />
%<br />
100<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Unauth<br />
orised<br />
Irregul<br />
ar<br />
Fruitle<br />
ss<br />
Expen<br />
diture<br />
(UIF)<br />
Regist<br />
er<br />
Update<br />
d<br />
contra<br />
ct<br />
registe<br />
r<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
R0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
R0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
Public<br />
confide<br />
nce<br />
Sound<br />
Admini<br />
stration
550<br />
FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />
KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />
OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
STRA<br />
TEGIC<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
SUB-<br />
PROJ<br />
ECTS<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPUT<br />
S<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
ANNU<br />
AL<br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
50%<br />
and<br />
register<br />
updatin<br />
g 50%)<br />
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />
NCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPAC<br />
TS<br />
FV/013<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
FV/0<strong>14</strong><br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
Report<br />
ing<br />
Expen<br />
diture<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
To<br />
ensure<br />
account<br />
ability<br />
To curb<br />
expendi<br />
ture<br />
varianc<br />
e at 5%<br />
Compli<br />
ance<br />
with all<br />
regulat<br />
ions<br />
Manag<br />
ed<br />
budget<br />
Human<br />
Resour<br />
ce<br />
Human<br />
and<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Resour<br />
ces<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
complian<br />
ce<br />
reports<br />
generate<br />
d<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
complian<br />
ce to<br />
acceptab<br />
le<br />
variance<br />
Chief<br />
Financi<br />
al<br />
Officer<br />
All<br />
Directo<br />
rs<br />
Section<br />
52,71,7<br />
2 and<br />
AFS<br />
No<br />
baselin<br />
e<br />
5<br />
Report<br />
s<br />
(Sectio<br />
n 71,<br />
Section<br />
52,<br />
Supply<br />
Chain,<br />
CIDB,<br />
Section<br />
72,<br />
AFS)<br />
5%<br />
varianc<br />
e<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
100<br />
.0%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5% 5<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
5<br />
%<br />
Counci<br />
l<br />
resoluti<br />
on<br />
Expen<br />
diture<br />
reports<br />
R 0 E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Sound<br />
financia<br />
l<br />
manag<br />
ement<br />
Sound<br />
financia<br />
l<br />
manag<br />
ement
551<br />
SPATIAL RATIONALE SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 6 : SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
SR/001<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
SR/002<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
SR/003<br />
/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />
20<strong>14</strong><br />
Strate<br />
gic<br />
Project<br />
s<br />
Growt<br />
h<br />
Manag<br />
ement<br />
Sub<br />
Project<br />
s<br />
Constr<br />
uction<br />
of<br />
munici<br />
pal<br />
offices<br />
GIS<br />
Trainin<br />
g and<br />
Hardw<br />
are<br />
Land<br />
Audit<br />
for<br />
municip<br />
al<br />
works<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
Provisio<br />
n of<br />
municip<br />
al office<br />
space<br />
GIS<br />
Training<br />
and<br />
Hardwar<br />
e<br />
Underta<br />
ke land<br />
audit for<br />
municip<br />
al works<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
Improv<br />
ed<br />
district<br />
spatial<br />
plannin<br />
g<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
Huma<br />
n and<br />
Finan<br />
cial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Huma<br />
n and<br />
Finan<br />
cial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Huma<br />
n and<br />
Finan<br />
cial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
facilitatio<br />
n of<br />
Mampuru<br />
township<br />
developm<br />
ent<br />
Number<br />
of local<br />
and<br />
district<br />
staff<br />
trained<br />
on GIS<br />
Percenta<br />
ge<br />
completio<br />
n of land<br />
audit for<br />
municipal<br />
works<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
SG<br />
Diagra<br />
m and<br />
valuatio<br />
n<br />
Report<br />
Draft<br />
GIS<br />
Strateg<br />
y<br />
Spatial<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Frame<br />
work<br />
20<strong>14</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
100%<br />
facilitat<br />
ion of<br />
Mamp<br />
uru<br />
townsh<br />
ip<br />
develo<br />
pment<br />
10<br />
local<br />
and<br />
district<br />
staff<br />
trained<br />
on GIS<br />
100%<br />
compl<br />
etion<br />
of land<br />
audit<br />
for<br />
munici<br />
pal<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
25<br />
%<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
50<br />
%<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
75<br />
%<br />
Q4<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
EVID<br />
ENCE<br />
Com<br />
munit<br />
y<br />
Resol<br />
ution<br />
0 5 0 5 Annu<br />
al<br />
Traini<br />
ng<br />
Repor<br />
t<br />
25<br />
%<br />
50<br />
%<br />
75<br />
%<br />
10<br />
0<br />
%<br />
Land<br />
audit<br />
report<br />
for<br />
munic<br />
ipal<br />
works<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
R869<br />
,262<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
IMPACTS<br />
Sustainab<br />
le Spatial<br />
Rationale<br />
Sustainab<br />
le Spatial<br />
Rationale<br />
Sustainab<br />
le Spatial<br />
Rationale
552<br />
SPATIAL RATIONALE SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />
KPA 6 : SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />
<strong>IDP</strong><br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
Strate<br />
gic<br />
Project<br />
s<br />
Sub<br />
Project<br />
s<br />
OBJEC<br />
TIVES<br />
OUTP<br />
UTS<br />
INPU<br />
TS<br />
PERFRO<br />
MANCE<br />
INDICAT<br />
ORS<br />
INDIC<br />
ATOR<br />
CUST<br />
ODIAN<br />
2012/2<br />
013<br />
BASEL<br />
INES<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />
0<strong>14</strong><br />
TARG<br />
ETS<br />
works<br />
Q<br />
1<br />
Q<br />
2<br />
Q<br />
3<br />
Q4<br />
EVID<br />
ENCE<br />
BUD<br />
GET<br />
FUN<br />
DER<br />
IMPACTS<br />
De<br />
Hoop<br />
Mampu<br />
ru<br />
To<br />
facilitate<br />
impleme<br />
ntation<br />
of De<br />
Hoop<br />
housing<br />
project<br />
to<br />
facilitate<br />
Mampur<br />
u<br />
Townshi<br />
p<br />
Develop<br />
ment<br />
Houses<br />
Land<br />
secure<br />
d<br />
Huma<br />
n and<br />
Finan<br />
cial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Huma<br />
n and<br />
Finan<br />
cial<br />
Reso<br />
urces<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertak<br />
en to<br />
facilitate<br />
De Hoop<br />
Housing<br />
project<br />
Number<br />
of<br />
initiatives<br />
undertak<br />
en to<br />
facilitate<br />
Mampuru<br />
township<br />
developm<br />
ent<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
Directo<br />
r<br />
Planni<br />
ng and<br />
Econo<br />
mic<br />
Develo<br />
pment<br />
meetin<br />
gs held<br />
meetin<br />
gs held<br />
12<br />
initiativ<br />
es<br />
undert<br />
aken<br />
4<br />
initiativ<br />
es<br />
undert<br />
aken<br />
3 3 3 3 Repor<br />
ts and<br />
minut<br />
es<br />
1 1 1 1 Repor<br />
ts and<br />
minut<br />
es<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
E-<br />
Shar<br />
e<br />
Intergover<br />
nmental<br />
relations<br />
Intergover<br />
nmental<br />
relations
553<br />
ANNEXURE B<br />
SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />
ADOPTED ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE<br />
<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong>
554<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE: <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> -2015/2016<br />
The proposed organisational structure is made of 1122 posts from 1080 posts. There is an<br />
increase of 42 posts from 1080. There are 789 funded posts available. There are a total of 342<br />
vacant posts in the proposed organisational structure of which nine (9) are funded. The<br />
remaining 329 posts will be funded during the financial year <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> based on their strategic<br />
functioning and availability of funds. The remainder of the vacant post will be funded in the<br />
ensuing Integrated Development Plan cycle.<br />
The major focus of the proposed organizational structure is the strengthening of Budget and<br />
Treasury, Community Services and Infrastructure & Water Services. In Budget and Treasury the<br />
focus is mainly on billing. The intention of the municipality is to take over billing from local<br />
municipalities and general financial management with special attention to improving internal<br />
controls. In Community Services there are two issues that require attention, mainly compliance<br />
and capacity enhancement. A new division responsible for disaster management is proposed to<br />
ensure segregation of duties between disaster management and emergency services. In<br />
addition more staff is required in emergency services to address acute shortage of staff and<br />
address compliance issues.<br />
The provision of reliable water services depends on the capacity of infrastructure and water<br />
services. To ensure that requisite capacity is available, additional post of pump operators and<br />
plump operators are suggested. This number of pump operators will address the shortage of<br />
man power which is currently provided by volunteers.<br />
Furthermore the draft organisational structure suggests the relocation of Fleet and Facilities<br />
from Budget and Treasury to Corporate Services. In addition Payroll is suggested to be<br />
relocated from Corporate Services to Budget and Treasury.<br />
Below is the elaborate for additional posts per department:<br />
9. OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER<br />
There is no new position proposed.<br />
10. MUNICIPAL MANAGER `S OFFICE<br />
There are 3 new proposed posts:<br />
· The post of Manager is proposed to deal with organizational performance and<br />
performance of the Executive Management.<br />
· The post of Senior Internal Officer is proposed to deal with IT and regulatory audit.
555<br />
· The additional post of Internal Auditor is proposed to enhance the capacity of the internal<br />
audit unit to handle their functions accurately.<br />
11. OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR<br />
There are 16 new positions proposed:<br />
· The post of Manager is proposed to deal with customer care. The rationale for the<br />
proposal is that issues on query management have been elevated.<br />
· The post of Marketing Officer is proposed to handle the marketing functions which were<br />
previously located in the department of planning and Economic Development.<br />
· The position of Website Development is proposed to ensure that website is properly<br />
managed. The function of website administration was moved from corporate services<br />
office to the Executive Mayor’s Office.<br />
· The post of photographer is proposed to provide expertise in the production of<br />
newsletters.<br />
· The post of Communication Officer is abolished and replaced by the post of the<br />
Marketing Officer.<br />
· The post of the Head of Security is proposed to provide for the security details of the<br />
Executive Mayor.<br />
· The post of Policy and IGR is proposed to deal with the Policy and IGR conditions.<br />
These areas did not have a dictated unit to handle.<br />
· The additional nine posts of call centre operators are proposed to provide for 24 hour<br />
services in line with requirements of the function.<br />
· The new post of Call Centre Officer is proposed to control room.<br />
12. CORPORATE SERVICES<br />
There are 12 new post proposed:<br />
· The post of OD Officer is proposed to have the required capacity to deal with the job<br />
evaluation function. The process of evaluating jobs is quiet demanding and requires<br />
dedicated personnel. As the district we are going to handle job evaluation for all the five<br />
local municipalities.<br />
· The function of individual PMS is relocating from Corporate Services to Planning and<br />
Economic Development.<br />
· The additional post of Labour Relations Officer is proposed to complement the unit.<br />
Currently there are two Officers and there is an official seconded to help in the division.<br />
· The post of IT Technician is proposed to capacitate the division. There is a project to<br />
extend the IT Infrastructure to all the regional offices and depots and this will require<br />
additional hands.
556<br />
· The post of Training Officer is proposed to help in dealing with some of the neglected<br />
functions of training namely, assessment of the impact of training interventions.<br />
· The additional post of EAP Officer is proposed to increase the capacity of the Unit to<br />
assist dealing with the welfare of the employees. Currently there is one EAP Officer and<br />
she is not coping with the demands of the organization.<br />
· The post of OHS clerk is proposed to ensure that compliance with OHS is met. Currently<br />
there is no OHS Clerk who must attend to all OHS requirements in all the work stations.<br />
· The post of Senior Facility Officer, Fleet Officer, two Facility Clerks are proposed to<br />
augment the section. Furthermore two posts of general workers are proposed to help the<br />
handyman to deal with maintenance work.<br />
13. COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
There are 33 new post proposed:<br />
· The two posts of Disaster Officers are proposed to ensure that disaster management is<br />
undertaken in all the five (5) Local Municipalities.<br />
· The post of Principal is proposed to ensure that there is accountability on the part of the<br />
training academy.<br />
· The post of the Chief Fire Inspector is proposed to comply with the fire act and also to<br />
deal with the demands of the farming community and rapid industrialisation in the<br />
distinct.<br />
· The eight additional posts of Leading Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum<br />
shifts.<br />
· The eight additional posts of Senior Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum shifts.<br />
· The eight additional post of Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum shifts<br />
<strong>14</strong>. INFRASTRUCTURE AND WATER SERVICES<br />
There are 243 new proposed posts. The majority of the posts are pump operators and<br />
plant Operators. Special focus is also paid to enforcement of municipal regulations, thus<br />
a creation of a post to administer water authority issues.<br />
· The post of Deputy Director Water Authority is proposed, 2 Secretaries for administration<br />
of the two deputy directors.<br />
· The Division Regulation and Governance is proposed to be under the Water<br />
Authority Sub-department, 1Manager, 2Monitoring and Evaluation Officer, furthermore<br />
the division of Strategic Planning is suggested with newly created positions of 2<br />
Technicians.<br />
· The PMU division proposed 1 Senior Project Manager and 1 Data Capturer.
557<br />
· The Water Provider sub-department under Bulk Operations division suggested 8<br />
positions that are dependent on section 78 process.<br />
· The Reticulation and Sanitation Division suggested 3 Artisan Plumbers,3 General<br />
Worker and 5 Admin clerk for administration of the Regional offices.<br />
· The 167 new posts of pump operators are proposed to ensure that there is a reliable<br />
water provision. Currently the function is performed by volunteers and this proposal is<br />
aimed at dealing with issues of volunteers to create sustainability<br />
· The 46 new posts of plant operators are proposed to enhance the capacity of the<br />
municipality to provide continuous operation of water treatment works and wastewater<br />
treatment works.<br />
· The Scientific Services suggested 1 Lab Technician and 1 Lab Assistant<br />
· The Electro Mechanical Division suggested 1 Admin Clerk for administration purpose.<br />
15. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />
There are 3 proposed new positions:<br />
· There is a new division named <strong>IDP</strong> and PMS, therefore a Manager and 1 <strong>IDP</strong> Officer<br />
post are proposed. The migrating function of PMS from Corporate services will be<br />
performed in this division.<br />
· The post of LED officer is proposed to deal with tourism.<br />
16. BUDGET AND TREASURY<br />
There are 38 proposed new posts:<br />
· The two additional posts of Accountants are proposed, one Accountant will deal with<br />
AFS and reporting.<br />
· The additional post of billing clerk is proposed to provide an additional capacity<br />
· The two additional posts of Credit Control Clerk are proposed to increase capacity to<br />
cope with the demands<br />
· The post of Indigent Clerk is proposed to enhance the capacity became the port<br />
· The two additional post of Data Capturers are proposed to capture information from<br />
meter readers<br />
· The post of Chief Meter Reader is proposed to enhance capacity for implementation of<br />
water services, particularly billing.<br />
· The twenty new post of meter readers are proposed to ensure that the takeover of billing<br />
function from local municipalities is properly handled and also the extension of billing to<br />
new areas are explored.<br />
· The additional post of Cashier is proposed to increase capacity.
558<br />
· The new post of Accounting Clerk is proposed to deal with filing of all vat returns,<br />
reconciliations and invoice files and preparation of audit files for all account balances<br />
within the trial Balance.<br />
· The additional post of Senior Procurement Officer is proposed to deal with demand and<br />
performance Management.<br />
· The additional post of Asset Officer is proposed to assist with the reconciliation of stock<br />
counts and asset register.<br />
· The five new post of Stores Clerks are proposed to assist the regional Offices
559<br />
COUNCIL<br />
EXECUTIVE MAYOR OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER OFFICE OF THE CHIEF WHIP
560<br />
OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER<br />
Purpose: To provide support to the Speaker’s<br />
Office.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Render administration support.<br />
1x Council Secretary<br />
1x Personal Assistant<br />
1 x Secretary (Whippery)<br />
DIVISION: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
Purpose: To facilitate public participation and<br />
public relations.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordinate public participation and stakeholder<br />
engagement.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Public Participation Officer<br />
3x Public Participation Coordinator<br />
DIVISION:COUNCIL SECRETARIAT<br />
Purpose: To render Council Secretariat Services<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Provide support to council<br />
2. Maintain records for council<br />
3. Provide secretariat services to council<br />
1 x Manager<br />
1 x Senior Admin Officer<br />
1 x Admin Officer<br />
5 x Committee Coordinator<br />
DIVISION:COUNCILOR SUPPORT<br />
Purpose: To render support to Councilors<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordinate capacity building & councilor welfare<br />
1 x Manager<br />
1 x Councilor Welfare Specialist<br />
1 x Councilor Welfare Coordinator<br />
1 x Researcher<br />
1 x Legal Officer
561<br />
OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER<br />
PURPOSE : To provide strategic administrative support to the council<br />
and ensure legislative compliant environment.<br />
FUNCTIONS:<br />
1.Monitor effectiveness of service delivery departments.<br />
1.1 Community services.<br />
1.2 Infrastructure and water services.<br />
1.3 Planning and economic development.<br />
2.Monitor effectiveness of support departments.<br />
2.1 Executive mayor's office<br />
2.2 Corporate services<br />
2.3 Budget and treasury<br />
1x Municipal Manager<br />
1x Chief Operations Officer<br />
1x Personal Assistant<br />
1x Secretary<br />
INTERNAL AUDIT<br />
Purpose: To provide an independant,<br />
objective assurance and consulting<br />
activity designed to add value and<br />
improve an organisation controls, risk<br />
management and governance processes.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Regularity audits.<br />
2. Performance audits.<br />
3.Information systems /IT audits.<br />
4.Investigation and adhok.<br />
1x Chief Audit Executive<br />
2x Senior Internal Auditor (1 new)<br />
4x Internal Auditor (1new)<br />
RISK MANAGEMENT<br />
Purpose: To manage the risk<br />
management function in line with<br />
corporate management strategy.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Risk assesment.<br />
2.Risk financing.<br />
3.Anti fraud & corruptions.<br />
4.Complaince management.<br />
5.Risk control.<br />
1x Chief Risk Officer<br />
2x Senior Risk Officer<br />
2x Risk Officer<br />
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT<br />
Purpose: To coordinate PMS for section<br />
56 employees.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Facilitate employment contracts and<br />
performance agreement.<br />
2.Coordinate quartely, mid year and<br />
annual reviews.<br />
3.Liase with sector departments for<br />
statutory reporting requirements.<br />
1x Manager (new)<br />
Executive<br />
Mayor's<br />
Office<br />
Corporate<br />
Services<br />
Community<br />
Services<br />
Infrastructure<br />
& Water<br />
Services<br />
Planning &<br />
Economic<br />
Development<br />
Budget &<br />
Treasury
562<br />
DEPARTMENT: EXECUTIVE MAYOR'S<br />
OFFICE<br />
Purpose: To provide executive support services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1.Monitor the implementation and impact of special<br />
programmes.<br />
2.Manage communications services.<br />
3.Render administrative support to the Executive Mayor.<br />
4. Render customer care services.<br />
1x Director<br />
1x Personal Assistant<br />
1x Secretary<br />
DIVISION: SPECIAL PROGRAMMES<br />
Purpose: To monitor the implementation and<br />
impact of special programmes.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Provide strategic linkages for special programmes.<br />
2.Facilitate youth, children and woman development<br />
programs.<br />
3. Facilitate gender empowerment programs.<br />
4. Advocate for intergration of people living with<br />
disabilities in the economic and social mainstream.<br />
1x Manager<br />
2x Special Programme Officer<br />
DIVISION: COMMUNICATIONS<br />
Purpose:To manage communications services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Monitor effective communication and marketing services.<br />
2. Promote public relations .<br />
3. Coordinate event management.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Media Liaison Officer<br />
1x Marketing Officer (new)<br />
2x Events Officer<br />
2x Community Liason Officer<br />
1x Website Development Officer (new)<br />
1x Photographer (new)<br />
1x Graphic Designer<br />
DIVISION: EXECUTIVE SUPPORT<br />
Purpose: To render administrative support to the Executive Mayor.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordinate and liaise with external stakeholders on behalf of the<br />
Executive Mayor.<br />
2. Facilitate executive support for the Executive Mayor and Mayoral<br />
committee.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Spokesperson<br />
1x Head of Security (new)<br />
2x Protocol Officer (1new)<br />
1x Policy & IGR Officer (new)<br />
2x Chauffer<br />
6x Secretary (MMC)<br />
DIVISION: CUSTOMER CARE<br />
Purpose: To render customer care services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Provide customer care services.<br />
2.Render call centre services.<br />
3.Attend to customer equiries<br />
1x Manager (new)<br />
1x Senior Customer Care Officer<br />
1x Call Centre Officer<br />
1x Call Centre Clerk<br />
12x Call Centre Operator (9new)<br />
2x Receptionist
563<br />
DEPARTMENT: CORPORATE SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To manage corporate services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Manage human resource administration.<br />
2. Manage organisational development.<br />
3. Manage labour relations.<br />
4. Manage auxillary services.<br />
5. Manage informantion and communication technology<br />
6. Manage human resources development.<br />
7. manage employee wellness services.<br />
8. Manage legal services.<br />
1x Director<br />
1x Secretary<br />
DIVISION: HUMAN RESOURCES<br />
ADMINISTRATION<br />
Purpose: To render human resources<br />
management services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Render human resources administration and<br />
benefits.<br />
2. Facilitate recruitment and selection.<br />
3. Coordinate policy development.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Senior HR Officer<br />
4x HR Officer<br />
2x HR Clerk<br />
DIVISION:ORGANISATIONAL<br />
DEVELOPMENT<br />
Purpose: To manage organisational<br />
development.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Process Improvement.<br />
2. Render organisational development services.<br />
3. Facilitate the development of job descriptions.<br />
4. Conduct job evaluation.<br />
1x Manager<br />
3x Organisational Development Officer (1new)<br />
DIVISION : LABOUR RELATIONS<br />
Purpose : To manage labour relations services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1.Handle misconduct cases.<br />
2. facilitate disciplinary procedures.<br />
1x Manager<br />
3x Labour Relations Officer (1new)<br />
DIVISION:AUXILIARY SERVICES<br />
Purpose:To manage auxiliary services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Render records management<br />
2. Manage fleet & facilities.<br />
1x Manager<br />
DIVISION: INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
Purpose: To manage information and<br />
communication technology.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Provide information and communication technology.<br />
2. Monitor the performance of ICT infrastructure.<br />
3. Monitor network performance.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Senior System Administrator<br />
1x Senior Network Controller<br />
4x IT Technician (1new)<br />
DIVISION: HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT<br />
Purpose: To facilitate competency development of<br />
employees.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Compilation and implementation of WPSDP.<br />
2. Coordinate training activities.<br />
3. Render human resources development.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Senior Training Officer<br />
3x Training Officer (1new)<br />
DIVISION: EMPLOYEE WELLNESS<br />
Purpose: To render employee wellness servicess.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Facilitate EAP Programmes.<br />
2. Effective and efficient management of workplace<br />
hazards.<br />
1x Manager<br />
2x EAP Officer (1new)<br />
1x OHS Officer<br />
2x OHS Clerk (1new)<br />
DIVISION : LEGAL SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To manage legal services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Provide legal advice to council and administration.<br />
2. Maintain and update legal resources.<br />
3. Provide executive support.<br />
1x Manager<br />
2x Legal Admin Officer
564<br />
DIVISION:AUXILIARY SERVICES<br />
Purpose:To manage auxiliary services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Render records management<br />
2. Manage fleet & facilities.<br />
1x Manager<br />
SECTION: RECORDS MANAGEMENT<br />
Purpose: To render records management<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Render photocopy services.<br />
2. Provide registry and archives services.<br />
1x Senior Records Admin Officer<br />
1x Records Officer<br />
4x Registry Clerk<br />
2x Photocopy Operator<br />
3x Messenger<br />
SECTION: FLEET MANAGEMENT<br />
Purpose: To co-ordinate, monitor and<br />
undertakes specific sequences/activities<br />
associated with fleet management.<br />
Functions:<br />
1.Ensure fleet maintanance of the<br />
municipality.<br />
2. Coordinate fleet control.<br />
1x Senior Fleet Officer<br />
1x Fleet Officer (new)<br />
3x Fleet Clerk<br />
SECTION: FACILITIES MANAGEMENT<br />
Purpose: To co-ordinate, monitor and<br />
undertakes specific sequences/activities<br />
associated with facilities management.<br />
Functions:<br />
1.Plan, organize, direct, and review the<br />
operations and activities of the facilities<br />
management.<br />
1x Senior Facilities Officer (new)<br />
1x Facilities Officer<br />
2x Facilities Clerk (new)<br />
1x Handyman<br />
2x General Worker (new)
565<br />
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To provide community services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Manage emergency services.<br />
2. Manage municipal health services.<br />
3. Manage disaster fuctions.<br />
4. Promote sports, arts and culture.<br />
1x Director<br />
1x Secretary<br />
DIVISION: EMERGENCY SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To manage emergency services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Render emergency services.<br />
2.Manage training academy.<br />
3. Facilitate fire safety services.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk<br />
DIVISION: MUNICIPAL HEALTH SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To manage municipal health and<br />
social services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1.Conduct awareness campaigns on municipal<br />
health programmes.<br />
2.Develop and implement the environmental management<br />
programmes.<br />
3.Monitor compliance on environmental health services.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x HIV/Aids Coordinator<br />
DIVISION: DISASTER MANAGEMENT<br />
Purpose: To manage all disaster functions.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Perform activities leading to risk reduction, recovery,<br />
rehabilitation, relief and response.<br />
1x Manager<br />
5x Disaster Officer (2new)<br />
DIVISION: SPORTS, ARTS AND CULTURE<br />
Purpose: To promote sports ,arts and culture<br />
services<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordinate sports, arts and culture programmes<br />
2. Promote arts & culture programmes<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Arts & Culture Officer<br />
1x Sports Officer
566<br />
DIVISION: EMERGENCY SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To manage emergency services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Render emergency services.<br />
2.Manage training academy.<br />
3. Facilitate fire safety services.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk<br />
TRAINING ACADEMY<br />
Purpose: To develop competent safe and effective fire<br />
service personnel.<br />
Functions:<br />
1.Develop and provide emergency services training<br />
programmes.<br />
1 x Principal (new)<br />
2x Training Officer<br />
FIRE SAFETY<br />
Purpose:To ensure a safe environment.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Reduce risk and ensure compliance.<br />
1x Chief Fire Inspector (new)<br />
5x Fire Inspector (new)<br />
EMERGENCY SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To provide an effective fire and rescue<br />
services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Enforsement of municipal emergency<br />
management services by-laws.<br />
2. Ensure the delivery of effective and effecient<br />
emergency services.<br />
1 x Chief Fire Officer<br />
GROBLERSDAL FIRE STATION<br />
Purpose: To provide an effective fire and<br />
rescue services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Enforsement of municipal emergency<br />
management services by-laws.<br />
2. Ensure the delivery of effective and<br />
effecient emergency services.<br />
1x Divisional Fire Officer<br />
4x Station Officer<br />
8x Leading Fire Fighter (4new)<br />
8x Senior Fire Fighter (4new)<br />
8x Fire Fighter (4new)<br />
8x Junior Fire Fighter<br />
MAKHUDUTHAMAGA FIRE STATION<br />
Purpose: To provide an effective fire and<br />
rescue services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Enforsement of municipal emergency<br />
management services by-laws.<br />
2. Ensure the delivery of effective and<br />
effecient emergency services.<br />
1x Divisional Fire Officer<br />
4x Station Officer<br />
8x Leading Fire Fighter (4new)<br />
8x Senior Fire Fighter (4new)<br />
8x Fire Fighter (4new)<br />
8x Junior Fire Fighter<br />
TUBATSE FIRE STATION<br />
Purpose: To provide an effective fire and<br />
rescue services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Enforsement of municipal emergency<br />
management services by-laws.<br />
2. Ensure the delivery of effective and<br />
effecient emergency services.<br />
1x Divisional Fire Officer<br />
4x Station Officer<br />
8x Leading Fire Fighter (4new)<br />
8x Senior Fire Fighter (4new)<br />
8x Fire Fighter (4new)<br />
8x Junior Fire Fighter
567<br />
DIVISION: MUNICIPAL HEALTH SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To manage municipal health and<br />
social services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1.Conduct awareness campaigns on municipal<br />
health programmes.<br />
2.Develop and implement the environmental management<br />
programmes.<br />
3.Monitor compliance on environmental health services.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x HIV/Aids Coordinator<br />
MAKHUDUTHAMAGA REGION<br />
Purpose: To render Municipal Health Services.<br />
FETAKGOMO REGION<br />
Purpose: To render Municipal Health Services.<br />
EPHRAIM MOGALE REGION<br />
Purpose: To render Municipal Health Services.<br />
ELIAS MOTSOALEDI REGION<br />
Purpose: To render Municipal Health Services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement MHS functional areas.i.e food<br />
control, waste management, health surveillance<br />
of premises.<br />
1 x Chief Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
1 x Senior Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
2 x Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement MHS functional areas.i.e food<br />
control, waste management, health surveillance<br />
of premises.<br />
1 x Chief Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
1 x Senior Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
2 x Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement MHS functional areas.i.e food<br />
control, waste management, health surveillance<br />
of premises.<br />
1 x Chief Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
1 x Senior Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
2 x Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
Fuctions:<br />
1. Implement MHS functional areas.i.e food<br />
control, waste management, health surveillance<br />
of premises.<br />
1 x Chief Enviromental Health Practitioner<br />
1 x Senior Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
4 x Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
TUBATSE REGION<br />
Purpose: To render Municipal Health Services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement MHS functional areas.i.e food<br />
control, waste management, health surveillance<br />
of premises.<br />
1 x Chief Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
1 x Senior Environmental Health Practitioner<br />
4 x Environmental Health Practitioner
568<br />
DEPARTMENT: INFRASTRUCTURE & WATER SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To develop, operate and maintain water services<br />
infrastructure.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Strategic management of water services.<br />
2. Coordinate & facilitate transport services.<br />
3. Coordinate energy services.<br />
1x Director<br />
1x Secretary<br />
SUB-DEPARTMENT: WATER SERVICES AUTHORITY<br />
Purpose: To manage water services infrastructure develpment<br />
and monitor the provision of water services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Strategic planning.<br />
2. Implementation of projects.<br />
3. Regulatory and governance.<br />
4. Water conservation & water demand management planning.<br />
1x Deputy Director (new)<br />
1x Secretary (new)<br />
SUB-DEPARTMENT: WATER SERVICES PROVIDER<br />
Purpose: To provide water services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Manage bulk water services infrastructure.<br />
2. Manage water reticulation and sanitation services.<br />
3. Manage scientific services.<br />
1x Deputy Director<br />
1x Secretary (new)
569<br />
SUB-DEPARTMENT: WATER SERVICES AUTHORITY<br />
Purpose: To manage water services infrastructure<br />
develpment and monitor the provision of water services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Strategic planning.<br />
2. Implementation of projects.<br />
3. Regulatory and governance.<br />
4. Water conservation & water demand management<br />
planning.<br />
1x Deputy Director (new)<br />
1x Secretary (new)<br />
DIVISION: PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT<br />
Purpose: To manage the implementation of<br />
capital projects.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Financial management.<br />
2. Implementation of projects.<br />
3. Contract administration.<br />
4. Programme / Project management.<br />
5. Community Liaison / Development.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Senior Project Manager (new)<br />
1x Project Accountant<br />
10x Project Officer/ Technicians<br />
3x ISD Officer<br />
1x Data Capturer (new)<br />
DIVISION: REGULATION & GOVERNANCE UNIT<br />
Purpose: To monitor and evaluate the provision<br />
and compliance of water services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Monitoring the performance of the WSPs.<br />
2. Providing tools and mechanisms for reporting.<br />
3. Development and enforcement of by-laws and<br />
policies.<br />
4. Setting Tariffs.<br />
5. Development of service standards and client<br />
services charter.<br />
1x Manager (new)<br />
2x Monitoring & Evaluation Officer (new)<br />
DIVISION: STRATEGIC PLANNING UNIT<br />
Purpose: To ensure adequate planning of water<br />
services developments.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Drafting of strategic water services plans.<br />
2. Approval of development plans.<br />
1x Planning Engineer<br />
3x Technicians (2new)
570<br />
SUB-DEPARTMENT: WATER SERVICES PROVIDER<br />
Purpose: To provide water services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Manage bulk water services infrastructure.<br />
2. Manage water reticulation and sanitation services.<br />
3. Manage scientific services.<br />
1x Deputy Director<br />
1x Secretary (new)<br />
DIVISION: BULK OPERATIONS<br />
Purpose: To manage the operation of bulk water<br />
services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Manage water resources and water treatment<br />
works<br />
2. Manage waste water treatment works<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Water Treatment Works Officer: WTP (new)<br />
1x Waste Water Treatment Works Officer:<br />
WWTP (new)<br />
2x Plant Supt: WTP & WWTP (new)<br />
2x Senior Plant Operator: WTP & WWTP (new)<br />
2x Plant Operator: WTP & WWTP (new)<br />
DIVISION: RETICULATION & SANITATION<br />
SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To provide water services directly to<br />
the consumer.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Operate and maintain water distribution<br />
systems.<br />
2.Customer care services.<br />
3. Implement water conservation & water<br />
demand management<br />
4. Operate and maintain boreholes .<br />
1x Manager<br />
5x ISD Officer<br />
1 x Water Conservation & Water Demand Officer<br />
3x Artisan plumber (new)<br />
6x General workers (3new)<br />
DIVISION: SCIENTIFIC SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To ensure adherance to water quality<br />
regulations.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Developing and implementing water quality<br />
management systems.<br />
1x Manager<br />
5x Water Quality Officer<br />
1x Lab Technician (new)<br />
1x Lab Assistant (new)
571<br />
DIVISION: RETICULATION & SANITATION<br />
SERVICES<br />
Purpose: To provide water services directly to<br />
the consumer.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Operate and maintain water distribution<br />
systems.<br />
2.Customer care services.<br />
3. Implement water conservation & water<br />
demand management<br />
4. Operate and maintain boreholes .<br />
1x Manager<br />
5x ISD Officer<br />
1 x Water Conservation & Water Demand Officer<br />
3x Artisan plumber (new)<br />
6x General workers (3new)<br />
FETAKGOMO REGION<br />
Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />
and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />
and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />
ELIAS MOTSWALEDI REGION<br />
Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />
and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />
and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />
EPHRAIM MOGALE REGION<br />
Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />
and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />
and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />
MAKHUDUTHAMAGA REGION<br />
Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />
and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />
and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordination of the depot.<br />
2. Management of tankering service.<br />
3. Reporting on performance of the region..<br />
1x Regional Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />
3x Driver<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordination of the depot.<br />
2. Management of tankering service.<br />
3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />
1x Regional Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />
5x Driver<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordination of the depot.<br />
2. Management of tankering service.<br />
3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />
1x Regional Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk(new)<br />
4x Driver<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordination of the depot.<br />
2. Management of tankering service.<br />
3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />
1x Regional Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />
5x Driver<br />
TUBATSE REGION<br />
Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />
and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />
and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />
SECTION: ELECTRO MECHANICAL<br />
Purpose: To render operations and maintenance<br />
services of boreholes, boosters supply pumps.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordination of the depot.<br />
2. Management of tankering service.<br />
3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />
1x Regional Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />
6x Driver (5new)<br />
Functions:<br />
1.Ensure that all electrical and mechanical<br />
pumps are in operation.<br />
2.Render welding services.<br />
1x Electro - Mechanical Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk (new)
572<br />
FETAKGOMO REGION<br />
Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />
and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />
and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordination of the depot.<br />
2. Management of tankering service.<br />
3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />
1x Regional Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />
3x Driver<br />
APEL DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
19x Pump Operator (new)<br />
8x General Worker<br />
BB KLOOF DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meter.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
<strong>23</strong>x Pump Operator (new)<br />
8x General Worker
573<br />
ELIAS MOTSWALEDI REGION<br />
Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />
and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />
and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordination of the depot.<br />
2. Management of tankering service.<br />
3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />
1x Regional Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />
5x Driver<br />
MOTETEMA/GROBLERSDAL<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
UITSPANNING DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
HLOGOTLOU DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
TAFELKOP/ROSSENEKAL<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
8x General Worker<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
17x Pump Operator (new)<br />
8x General Worker<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
10x Pump Operator (2new)<br />
8x General Worker<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
8x Pump Operator<br />
8x General Worker
574<br />
EPHRAIM MOGALE REGION<br />
Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />
and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />
and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordination of the depot.<br />
2. Management of tankering service.<br />
3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />
1x Regional Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk(new)<br />
4x Driver<br />
ELANDSRAAL DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
MOGANYAKA DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
MOUTSE WEST (ZAMEKOMSTE)<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
MARBLE-HALL<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
2x Pump Operator (new)<br />
8x General Worker<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
1x Pump Operator<br />
8x General Worker<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
4x Pump Operator (new)<br />
8x General Worker<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
8x General Worker
575<br />
MAKHUDUTHAMAGA REGION<br />
Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />
and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />
and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordination of the depot.<br />
2. Management of tankering service.<br />
3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />
1x Regional Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />
5x Driver<br />
MASEMOLA CENTRAL DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
8x Pump Operator<br />
8x General Worker)<br />
NEBO CENTRAL DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
15x Pump Operator (7new)<br />
8x General Worker)<br />
SCHOONORD DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
18x Pump Operator (10new)<br />
8x General Worker
576<br />
TUBATSE REGION<br />
Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />
and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />
and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Coordination of the depot.<br />
2. Management of tankering service.<br />
3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />
1x Regional Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />
6x Driver (5new)<br />
PENGE/PRACTISEEE DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
MOROKE DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
LEBOENG DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
MAPODILE DEPOT<br />
Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />
water reticulation & storage systems.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
15x Pump Operator (4new)<br />
8x General Worker<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
47x Pump Operator (new)<br />
8x General Worker<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
<strong>23</strong>x Pump Operator (new)<br />
8x General Worker<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />
distribution & water storage works.<br />
2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />
maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />
on site sanitation systems.<br />
3. Installation of new water meters.<br />
1x Depot Manager<br />
2x Artisan Plumber<br />
1x Foreman<br />
15x Pump Operator (9new)<br />
8x General Worker
577<br />
SECTION: ELECTRO MECHANICAL<br />
Purpose: To render operations and maintenance<br />
services of boreholes, boosters supply pumps.<br />
Functions:<br />
1.Ensure that all electrical and mechanical pumps are<br />
in operation.<br />
2.Render welding services.<br />
1x Electro - Mechanical Manager<br />
1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />
SECTION: WORKSHOP (Electrical)<br />
Purpose: To render electrical services.<br />
Functions<br />
1. Maintence of water and sewer infrastructure.<br />
1x Workshop Manager<br />
5x Artisan<br />
5x Artisan AId<br />
SECTION: WORKSHOP (Mechanical)<br />
Purpose: To render mechanical services.<br />
Functions<br />
1.Manitenance of water and sewer infrastructure.<br />
1x Workshop Manager<br />
5x Artisan<br />
5x Artisan AId<br />
SECTION: WORKSHOP (Welding)<br />
Purpose: To render welding services.<br />
Functions:<br />
1.Maintenence of water and sewer infrastructure.<br />
1x Workshop Manager<br />
5x Artisan<br />
5x Artisan AId
578<br />
DEPARTMENT:PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />
Purpose: To ensure integrated planning,sustainable spatial<br />
development and stimulation of economic<br />
development.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Manage spatial development planning.<br />
2. Coordinate and facilitate local economic development.<br />
3. Monitor performance and ensure implementation.<br />
4. Coordinate strategic planning.<br />
1x Director<br />
1x Secretary<br />
DIVISION: SPATIAL PLANNING<br />
Purpose : To manage spatial development planning.<br />
Functions :<br />
1. Incorporate environmental management<br />
practices in planning.<br />
2. Ensure coherent spatial development<br />
planning.<br />
3. Pursue sustainable land use management<br />
practices.<br />
4. Manage spatial information.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x GIS Specialist<br />
2x Town Planner<br />
1x GIS Technician<br />
DIVISION: LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />
Purpose : To cordinate and facilitate local economic<br />
development.<br />
Functions<br />
1.Develop small medium and micro enterprises.<br />
2.Facilitate agriculture development .<br />
3.Promote tourism development.<br />
4.Facilitate mining related activities and<br />
investment attraction and retention.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x LED Officer(Enterprise Development)<br />
1x LED Officer(Agriculture)<br />
1x LED Officer (Tourism) (new)<br />
DIVISION: <strong>IDP</strong> & PMS<br />
Purpose: To facilitate PMS functions.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Cascading PMS to all levels except section 56<br />
employees.<br />
2.Consolidate monthly, quartely, mid year and annual<br />
report.<br />
3.Prepare process plan for & review of <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />
4.Compile <strong>IDP</strong> documents.<br />
5.Facilitate community participation process.<br />
6.Liase with secgor departments for alignment<br />
purposes.<br />
1x Manag er(new)<br />
1x Senior PMS Officer<br />
1x Senior <strong>IDP</strong> Officer<br />
2x PMS Officer<br />
2x <strong>IDP</strong> Officer (1new)
579<br />
DEPARTMENT: BUDGET & TREASURY<br />
Purpose: To provide financial management services<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Manage revenue and expenditure.<br />
2. Manage budget and reporting.<br />
3. Provide supply chain management services.<br />
4. Manage municipal assets.<br />
1x CFO<br />
1x Deputy CFO<br />
1x Secretary<br />
DIVISION: REVENUE<br />
Purpose: To manage revenue.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Collection of revenue (meter reading,<br />
billing, data & receipt management incl.<br />
customer care).<br />
2. Debt & credit control management.<br />
3. Indigent registration & management .<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Accountant<br />
1x Billing Officer<br />
1x Credit Control Officer<br />
2x Billing Clerk (1new)<br />
3x Credit Control Clerk (2new)<br />
1x Indigent Clerk (new)<br />
2x Data Capturer (new)<br />
1x Chief Meter Reader (new)<br />
20x Meter Reader (new)<br />
3x Cashier (1new)<br />
DIVISION: EXPENDITURE<br />
Purpose: To manage expenditure.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Manage creditors accounts.<br />
2. Manage payroll.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Accountant<br />
1x Chief Payroll Officer<br />
2x Senior Expenditure Clerk<br />
3x Expenditure Clerk<br />
2x Data Capture<br />
3x Payroll Clerk<br />
DIVISION: BUDGET & REPORTING<br />
Purpose: To manage budget and reporting.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Manage budget planning process.<br />
2. Monitor budget implementation.<br />
3. Reporting and preparation of annual financial<br />
statements.<br />
4. Cash management.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Accountant: Budget<br />
1x Accountant: AFS and Reporting (new)<br />
2x Budget Clerks<br />
1x Accounting Clerk (new)<br />
DIVISION: SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT<br />
Purpose: To provide supply chain management<br />
services<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Manage demand & acquisition<br />
1 x Manager<br />
1x Senior Procurement Officer: Demand &<br />
Performance Management (new)<br />
1x Senior Procurement Ofiicer (Acquisition)<br />
2x Procurement Officer(Acquisition)<br />
1x Procurement Officer (Demand & Performance<br />
Management)<br />
1x Senior Procurement Clerk<br />
5x Procurement Clerk<br />
DIVISION: ASSET MANAGEMENT<br />
Purpose: To manage municipal assets.<br />
Functions:<br />
1. Safeguarding of assets.<br />
2. Maintenance of the asset register, stores<br />
and logistics management.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Accountant<br />
1x Project Accountant (new)<br />
2x Asset Officer (1new)<br />
1x Stores Officers<br />
5x Stores Clerk: Depots (new)<br />
5x Assets Clerk<br />
DIVISION: CONTRACT MANAGEMENT<br />
Purpose: To ensure that contracts &<br />
agreements procured through supply chain<br />
management of the municipality are properly<br />
enforced.<br />
Functions:<br />
1.contract drafting<br />
2.Contract classification and management.<br />
1x Manager<br />
1x Contract Management Officer<br />
1x Admin Clerk
580