22.11.2014 Views

IDP Review 2013-14(23 July 2013) - Sekhukhune District Municipality

IDP Review 2013-14(23 July 2013) - Sekhukhune District Municipality

IDP Review 2013-14(23 July 2013) - Sekhukhune District Municipality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> <strong>IDP</strong> REVIEW


2<br />

SUMMARY INDEX (CONTENTS)<br />

CONTENTS<br />

PAGE NO.<br />

Preface 3<br />

Chapter 1: Introduction and Context 18<br />

Chapter 2: Governance and Institutional<br />

Framework<br />

73<br />

Chapter 3: Analysis Phase 78<br />

Chapter 4: Strategy Phase 249<br />

Chapter 5: Project Phase 276<br />

Chapter 6: Integration Phase 432<br />

Annexure A: SDBIP 455<br />

Annexure B: Organisational Structure 553


3<br />

PREFACE<br />

Integrated Development Planning is a locally based plan that is undertaken by the<br />

municipality in line with the provisions of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act,<br />

2000 (Act 32 of 2000) as well as other myriad of local government legislation. The <strong>IDP</strong>, in<br />

its nature, must be participatory and must pull together various actors within and outside<br />

the municipal area towards achieving common purpose and objectives and eventually<br />

making places where people live, work and play better.<br />

The Integrated Development Plan (<strong>IDP</strong>) <strong>Review</strong> for <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> deals with the challenges,<br />

opportunities, weaknesses and threats that the municipality is facing and will continue to<br />

face. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) experiences a number of challenges in the<br />

areas of access to water, access to electricity, measures to extend refuse removal to more<br />

households, unemployment which is standing at 50,9%, great numbers of female and child<br />

headed households, mechanisms to improve access to sanitation services and more<br />

importantly measures that can lead to job creation.<br />

Equally there are success stories that need to be told. From 1996 there has been slight<br />

shift in unemployment in the district from 61.6% to 50.9% in 2011. Access to water has<br />

improved and it now standing at 75% although challenges still remain around operations<br />

and maintenance. Electricity access is very high at 86% of the population.<br />

It is terribly important to also realise that there are various local and international issues<br />

that the municipality must contribute to in order to ensure that there is better life for all.<br />

The municipality must work two-fold to contribute to millennium development goals, the<br />

new growth path for South Africa and recently the National Development Plan that was<br />

adopted in 2012.


4<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is working increasingly hard to deal with the institutional<br />

and organisational development issues. With staff contingent at 930 in 2011, the<br />

municipality must re-organise the way of doing business to ensure that the expectations<br />

from communities are met.<br />

It cannot be emphasised that the municipality need to turn the corner regarding financial<br />

sustainability issues by ensuring that revenue base is strengthened and that new<br />

opportunities for collection are realised. The municipality is still highly dependent on grants<br />

whilst at the same time large sums of monies are spent on servicing water and sanitation<br />

services, this situation must alter.<br />

SDM is a typically rural municipality with multiple pockets of peri-urban to urban areas.<br />

These areas are surrounded by sparsely populated rural settlements where service levels<br />

are inadequate. There is a need to deal with these spatial challenges and fight land<br />

invasion, conserve strategically located land for the future and formalise informal areas.<br />

The role of tribal authorities is quite central in this process.<br />

In conclusion, the <strong>IDP</strong> <strong>Review</strong> for <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> has been compiled within the Medium Term<br />

Revenue and Expenditure Framework (MTREF) and has included key indicators and<br />

targets for performance per Key Performance Area (KPA). It is envisaged that in<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> and beyond, a demand based performance management system will be<br />

implemented which will take into account the requirement in the annual reports, issues<br />

raised by the Auditor General, the measurable indicators for development from Statistics<br />

South Africa (SSA) and fit that information into the Service Delivery and Budget<br />

Implementation Plan (SDBIP) and <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />

It is important to thank all the role players who have contributed in various ways to this <strong>IDP</strong><br />

<strong>Review</strong> for <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>.


5<br />

Table of Contents<br />

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT .......................................................................... 18<br />

1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 19<br />

1.1. POLICIES AND LEGAL PARAMETERS ......................................................................... 19<br />

1.1.1. GLOBAL IMPERATIVES.......................................................................................... 19<br />

1.1.2. NATIONAL POLICIES AND IMPERATIVES ............................................................ 20<br />

1.1.3. PROVINCIAL IMPERATIVES .................................................................................. 27<br />

1.1.4. LOCAL IMPERATIVES ............................................................................................ 28<br />

1.1.5. POWERS AND FUNCTIONS ................................................................................... 31<br />

1.2. MEC’S COMMENTS ....................................................................................................... 34<br />

1.3. AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORT ................................................................................... 36<br />

1.4. PLANNING PROCESS ................................................................................................... 58<br />

1.5. ALIGNMENT WITH NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ................................................ 62<br />

1.6. ALIGNMENT WITH NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN ........................................... 66<br />

1.7. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF THE DISTRICT ............................................................. 68<br />

CHAPTER 2: GOVERNANCE AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ......................................... 73<br />

2.1. LEGISLATURE ............................................................................................................... 74<br />

2.2. CHIEF WHIP ................................................................................................................... 75<br />

2.3. SECTION 80 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEES ..................................................................... 75<br />

2.4. SECTION 79 STANDING COMMITTEES ....................................................................... 76<br />

2.5. THE EXECUTIVE ........................................................................................................... 76<br />

2.6. THE LEADER OF EXECUTIVE BUSINESS .................................................................... 76<br />

2.7. ADMINISTRATION ......................................................................................................... 77<br />

2.8. MUNICIPAL OWNED ENTITY ........................................................................................ 77<br />

2.9. HUMAN RESOURCES ................................................................................................... 77<br />

CHAPTER 3: ANALYSIS PHASE ................................................................................................ 78<br />

3.1 DEMOGRAPHICS IN SDM .................................................................................................. 79<br />

3.2 SPATIAL RATIONALE ......................................................................................................... 94<br />

3.2.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 94


6<br />

3.2.2. Status Quo ............................................................................................................... 94<br />

3.2.3. Challenges ............................................................................................................. 1<strong>14</strong><br />

3.3. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL TRANSFORMATION .... 115<br />

3.3.1. Powers and Funtions of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>...................................... 115<br />

3.3.2. Organizational Structure ........................................................................................ 116<br />

3.3.3. Human Resources Management (HRM) ................................................................ 1<strong>23</strong><br />

3.3.4. Human Resources Development (HRD) ................................................................ 124<br />

3.3.5. Employee Assistance Programme (EAP)............................................................... 125<br />

3.3.6. Occupational Health & Safety ................................................................................ 126<br />

3.3.7. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) ................................................ 127<br />

3.3.8. Auxiliary Services (AS) .......................................................................................... 129<br />

3.3.9. Legal Services ....................................................................................................... 130<br />

3.3.10. Labour Relations .................................................................................................... 131<br />

3.3.11. Organizational Development (OD) ......................................................................... 132<br />

3.3.12. Status Quo on High Level Delivery Areas in 2012/<strong>2013</strong> ......................................... 133<br />

3.4. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT ................... 136<br />

3.4.1. Water ..................................................................................................................... 136<br />

3.4.2. Sanitation ............................................................................................................... <strong>14</strong>5<br />

3.4.3. Refuse removal ...................................................................................................... <strong>14</strong>8<br />

3.4.4. Electricity ............................................................................................................... 150<br />

3.4.5. Cemeteries ............................................................................................................ 153<br />

3.4.6. Housing ................................................................................................................. 154<br />

3.4.7. Telecommunication ................................................................................................ 158<br />

3.4.8. Roads and Stormwater .......................................................................................... 159<br />

3.4.9. Waste Management ............................................................................................... 162<br />

3.4.10. Environmental Management .................................................................................. 164<br />

3.4.11. Sports, Arts and Culture ......................................................................................... 166<br />

3.4.12. Health .................................................................................................................... 167<br />

3.4.13. Education ............................................................................................................... 177<br />

3.4.<strong>14</strong>. Social Services (Welfare)....................................................................................... 181<br />

3.4.15. Safety and Security ................................................................................................ 187


7<br />

3.4.16. Transportation ........................................................................................................ 192<br />

3.5. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................... 194<br />

3.5.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 194<br />

3.5.2. Status Quo ............................................................................................................. 195<br />

3.5.3. Challenges ............................................................................................................. 2<strong>23</strong><br />

3.5.4. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Development Agency (SDA).............................................................. 224<br />

3.6. FINANCIAL VIABILITY.................................................................................................. 227<br />

3.6.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 227<br />

3.6.2. Compliance with Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA).............................. 227<br />

3.6.3. Overall Challenges................................................................................................. 228<br />

3.6.4. Asset Management ................................................................................................ <strong>23</strong>0<br />

3.6.5. Budget and Reporting ............................................................................................ <strong>23</strong>1<br />

3.6.6. Revenue Management ........................................................................................... <strong>23</strong>2<br />

3.6.7. Supply Chain Management .................................................................................... <strong>23</strong>4<br />

3.6.8. Contract Management ........................................................................................... <strong>23</strong>5<br />

3.6.9. Expenditure Management Unit ............................................................................... <strong>23</strong>6<br />

3.6.10. Summary overview of the MTREF ......................................................................... <strong>23</strong>7<br />

3.7. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .............................................. <strong>23</strong>8<br />

3.7.1. Internal Audit.......................................................................................................... <strong>23</strong>8<br />

3.7.2. Risk Management .................................................................................................. <strong>23</strong>9<br />

3.7.3. Public Participation ................................................................................................ 240<br />

3.7.4. Communications, Executive Support and Special Programmes ............................. 242<br />

3.7.5. Performance Management System (PMS)............................................................. 245<br />

3.7.6. High Level Delivery Areas Status Quo for 2012-<strong>2013</strong> ............................................ 246<br />

CHAPTER 4: STRATEGY PHASE ............................................................................................. 249<br />

4.1. VISION ......................................................................................................................... 250<br />

4.2. MISSION ...................................................................................................................... 250<br />

4.3. CORE VALUES OF THE MUNICIPALITY (BATHO PELE PRINCIPLES) ..................... 250<br />

4.4. MAYORAL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES .......................................................................... 250<br />

4.4.1. Economic Growth, Development and Job Creation ................................................ 251<br />

4.4.2. Access to Basic Services and Infrastructure .......................................................... 251


8<br />

4.4.3. Community Development and Social Cohesion ..................................................... 252<br />

4.4.4. Spatial Development and Sustainable Land Use Management .............................. 252<br />

4.4.5. Active Community Participation and Inter-governmental Alignment ....................... 253<br />

4.4.6. Accountable and Clean Government ..................................................................... 253<br />

4.5. SPATIAL RATIONALE .................................................................................................. 254<br />

4.6. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL TRANSFORMATION .... 255<br />

4.6.1. Employee wellness ................................................................................................ 256<br />

4.6.2. Occupational health and safety .............................................................................. 256<br />

4.6.3. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) ................................................ 256<br />

4.6.4. Human Resources Management (HRM) ................................................................ 257<br />

4.6.5. Auxiliary Services .................................................................................................. 257<br />

4.6.6. Legal Services ....................................................................................................... 258<br />

4.6.7. Labour Relations .................................................................................................... 258<br />

4.6.8. Organisational Development (OD) ......................................................................... 259<br />

4.6.9. Human Resources Development (HRD) ................................................................ 259<br />

4.7. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................. 260<br />

4.7.1. Water ..................................................................................................................... 260<br />

4.7.2. Sanitation ............................................................................................................... 261<br />

4.7.3. Disaster Management ............................................................................................ 261<br />

4.7.4. Environmental Management .................................................................................. 263<br />

4.7.5 Sports, Arts and Culture .............................................................................................. 263<br />

4.7.6. Emergency management ....................................................................................... 264<br />

4.7.7. Municipal Health Services ...................................................................................... 266<br />

4.8. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (LED)................................................................ 266<br />

4.8.1. LED ....................................................................................................................... 266<br />

4.8.2. SDA ....................................................................................................................... 267<br />

4.9. FINANCIAL VIABILITY.................................................................................................. 268<br />

4.10. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .............................................. 271<br />

4.10.1. Internal Audit.......................................................................................................... 271<br />

4.10.2. Risk Management .................................................................................................. 272<br />

4.10.3. Communication, Executive support and Special program ...................................... 273


9<br />

4.10.4. Public Participation ................................................................................................ 274<br />

4.10.5. Secretariat ............................................................................................................. 274<br />

4.10.6. Clean Audit ............................................................................................................ 274<br />

4.10.7. Councillor Welfare.................................................................................................. 275<br />

4.10.8. Capacity Building ................................................................................................... 275<br />

4.10.9. Performance Management System (PMS)............................................................. 275<br />

CHAPTER 5: PROJECTS PHASE ............................................................................................. 276<br />

5.1. SPATIAL RATIONALE .................................................................................................. 277<br />

5.2. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL TRANSFORMATION .... 279<br />

5.3. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT ................... 299<br />

5.4. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (LED)................................................................ 347<br />

5.5. FINANCIAL VIABILITY.................................................................................................. 351<br />

5.6. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .............................................. 358<br />

5.7. PROVINCIAL AND NATIONAL AGENCIES AND DEPARTMENTS .............................. 386<br />

CHAPTER 6: INTEGRATION PHASE ........................................................................................ 432<br />

6.1. STATUS OF SECTOR PLANS ..................................................................................... 433<br />

6.2. SPATIAL RATIONALE .................................................................................................. 433<br />

6.3. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY ........................................................................................ 436<br />

6.4. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................... 444<br />

6.5. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .............................................. 445<br />

6.6. FINANCIAL VIABILITY.................................................................................................. 450<br />

ANNEXURE A ............................................................................................................................ 455<br />

SERVICE DELIVERY AND BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SDBIP) <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> .............. 455<br />

ANNEXURE B ............................................................................................................................ 553<br />

ADOPTED ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> ............................................................. 553


10<br />

LIST OF TABLES<br />

Table<br />

number<br />

Subject<br />

Table1<br />

Table 2<br />

Table 3<br />

Table 4<br />

Table 5<br />

Table 6<br />

Table 7<br />

Table 8<br />

Table 9<br />

Table 10<br />

Table 11<br />

Table 12<br />

Table 13<br />

Table <strong>14</strong><br />

Composition of the structure, Roles and Responsibilities<br />

Number of wards per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Households in the district<br />

Main Dwellings<br />

Household tenure status<br />

Household ownership, Radio, Television, Computer, Refrigerator, Landline, Cell<br />

phone, Internet<br />

The recorded population figures per local municipality<br />

Gender profile: Males and Females<br />

Population growth by race<br />

Age and gender profile<br />

Marital Status<br />

Education status<br />

Education profile per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Categories of migrants from <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households<br />

Table 15 Remittances received by <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households in 2006<br />

Table 16<br />

Table 17<br />

Table 18<br />

Table 19<br />

Table 20<br />

Table 21<br />

Table 22<br />

Disability Types<br />

Income Groups in the SDM<br />

Economically Active population<br />

The Breakdown of employment by industry in the SDM<br />

Expected Population Growth Areas / Points for the SDM<br />

Land Use Patterns in the SDM<br />

Existing (Operational) and Planned Mines in the SDM


11<br />

Table <strong>23</strong> Projected Employment in Platinum Mining within / near the SDM up to 2015<br />

Table 24<br />

Table 25<br />

Table 26<br />

Table 27<br />

Table 28<br />

Table 29<br />

Table 30<br />

Table 31<br />

Table 32<br />

Table 33<br />

Table 34<br />

Table 35<br />

Table 36<br />

Table 37<br />

Table 38<br />

Table 39<br />

Table 40<br />

Table 41<br />

Table 42<br />

Table 43<br />

Table 44<br />

Table 45<br />

Table 46<br />

Table 47<br />

Accommodation Facilities in the SDM<br />

Hierarchy of settlements<br />

Growth Points in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

Land use patterns in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Domestic water services with infrastructure at or above RDP levels<br />

Water Services in Schools<br />

Water Services in Clinics<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Households that pay for water<br />

Water Backlog A<br />

Water Backlog B<br />

Access to piped water<br />

Breakdown of Sanitation Backlog per Local <strong>Municipality</strong> A<br />

Breakdown of Sanitation Backlog per Local <strong>Municipality</strong> B<br />

School Sanitation<br />

Clinic Sanitation<br />

Sanitation Type<br />

Access to Refuse Removal<br />

Electricity backlog per municipality<br />

Households receiving free electricity in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Energy for lighting, heating and cooking<br />

Typology of houses in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Dwelling types as a % of Households<br />

Housing Backlog<br />

Housing projects in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>


12<br />

Table 48<br />

Table 49<br />

Table 50<br />

Table 51<br />

Table 52<br />

Table 53<br />

Table 54<br />

Table 55<br />

Table 56<br />

Table 57<br />

Table 58<br />

Table 59<br />

Table 60<br />

Table 61<br />

Table 62<br />

Table 63<br />

Table 64<br />

Table 65<br />

Table 66<br />

Table 67<br />

Table 68<br />

Table 69<br />

Table 70<br />

Table 71<br />

Table 72<br />

Number of the structures on the road network under ownership of SDM<br />

Road network in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (<strong>District</strong> Roads)<br />

Number of health facilities in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Access to hospitals<br />

Access to clinics and professionals<br />

Availability of professional staff in clinics and hospitals<br />

Ranking <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s performance in SA: Key health indicators<br />

State of HIV/AIDS<br />

Backlog for Building of Clinics<br />

Health facilities<br />

Health facilities satisfaction status<br />

Health Facilities water supply<br />

Health facilities sanitation supply<br />

Health Facilities electricity available<br />

Education profile per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Shortage of Infrastructure in schools<br />

Backlogs for the building of schools<br />

Schools per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Schools source of water<br />

Schools type of sanitation<br />

Schools electricity availability<br />

Early childhood development centres<br />

Statistics on Grant Beneficiaries<br />

Beneficiaries of Key government programmes<br />

Most food – insecure areas in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>


13<br />

Table 73<br />

Table 74<br />

Table 75<br />

Table 76<br />

Table 77<br />

Table 78<br />

Table 79<br />

Pension pay points<br />

Pension pay points water supply<br />

Pension pay points sanitation available<br />

Pension pay points electricity available<br />

Crime Statistics in the SDM<br />

All subsidized bus operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

Distribution of Non-Subsidized Bus Operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

Municipal Area:<br />

Table 80 Key sectoral contributions to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s GGP (1995-2000)<br />

Table 81<br />

Table 82<br />

Table 83<br />

Table 84<br />

Table 85<br />

Table 86<br />

Table 87<br />

Table 88<br />

Table 89<br />

Table 90<br />

Table 91<br />

Table 92<br />

Table 93<br />

Table 94<br />

Table 95<br />

Operating and Projected Platinum Mines <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Market prospects for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> minerals<br />

Projected employment in platinum mining in/near <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Accommodation facilities in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Priority sectors of local municipality<br />

Main sectors: Services, Transport & Logistics, Construction, Manufacturing,<br />

property Market Agriculture, Agro-processing and Tourism<br />

Main markets: National Retailers, EU Agents & Chain stores, Gauteng Fresh<br />

Produce Markets - Sector: Agriculture, Agro-processing<br />

Tourism Sector: Accommodation and other tourism service providers<br />

Local Suppliers, Construction, transport & logistics, Services, Manufacturing,<br />

property market, Tourism<br />

Constraints to economic growth in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Employment levels<br />

Average household income<br />

Female Headed Households<br />

Child Headed Households<br />

Dependency Ratio


<strong>14</strong><br />

Table 96<br />

Table 97<br />

Table 98<br />

The AFS has been compiled in terms of GAMAP/GRAP<br />

Challenges and backlogs at Budget & Treasury Unit<br />

Summary overview of the MTREF<br />

Table 99 High level delivery areas status quo for 2012-13<br />

Table 100<br />

Table 101<br />

Table 102<br />

Table 103<br />

Table 104<br />

Policies/strategies<br />

Strategy Options<br />

Principles of PMS<br />

Roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders in PMS<br />

Accountability structure during the review process<br />

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Figure<br />

Subject<br />

Number<br />

Figure 1 The NSDP principles and perspective informing the basis for robust analysis for the three<br />

spheres of government<br />

Figure 2 Development Strategy<br />

Figure 3 Key activities and time frames for <strong>IDP</strong> Process<br />

Figure 4 Geographic Location Map<br />

Figure 5 Land size per Local <strong>Municipality</strong> in %<br />

Figure 6 Map of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> Municipal area<br />

Figure 7 SDM Wards<br />

Figure 8 Number of villages in the district<br />

Figure 9 Population growth rate<br />

Figure 10<br />

Figure 11<br />

Figure 12<br />

Figure 13<br />

Figure <strong>14</strong><br />

Population trends per LM<br />

Gender Profile: Males and Females<br />

Population by race<br />

Age structure<br />

Marital Status


15<br />

Figure 15<br />

Figure 16<br />

Figure 17<br />

Figure 18<br />

Figure 19<br />

Figure 20<br />

Figure 21<br />

Figure 22<br />

Figure <strong>23</strong><br />

Figure 24<br />

Figure 25<br />

Figure 26<br />

Figure 27<br />

Figure 28<br />

Figure 29<br />

Figure 30<br />

Figure 31<br />

Figure 32<br />

Figure 33<br />

Figure 34<br />

Education status<br />

SDM Population Distribution Map<br />

SDM Growth Point<br />

Centres of Agricultural Production<br />

Operational Mines in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

SDM Transport Network<br />

Growth points in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

Water supply energy source<br />

Frequency of water supply by village<br />

Pump operator availability by village<br />

Source of water supply by village<br />

Standard of water supply by village<br />

Type of sanitation by village<br />

Sanitation programme implemented by government by village<br />

Refuse removal according to villages<br />

Electricity supply<br />

Electricity post connections<br />

Access to cemeteries<br />

Government Housing Programme (RDP Housing)<br />

Telecommunication<br />

Figure 35 Gravel and Tarred Roads<br />

Figure 36 Main Revenue Flow<br />

Figure 37 Employment levels 2011<br />

Figure 38<br />

Local Economic Development Projects


16<br />

Abbreviations<br />

AS<br />

CoGHSTA<br />

DoE<br />

DoA<br />

DWAE<br />

ECD<br />

EAP<br />

EIA<br />

EPWP<br />

FBE<br />

FBS<br />

FBW<br />

FIVIMS<br />

GGP<br />

HIV<br />

HOD<br />

HRD<br />

HRM<br />

ICT<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

IEMP<br />

IGR<br />

ISDF<br />

ISRDP<br />

ITP<br />

IWMP<br />

LDOs<br />

LDV<br />

LED<br />

LEDET<br />

LEGDP<br />

LGDS<br />

LIBSA<br />

LIMDEV<br />

LM<br />

LSM<br />

LTP<br />

Auxiliary Services<br />

Co-operative Governance, Human Settlements & Traditional Affairs<br />

Department of Energy<br />

Department of Agriculture<br />

Department of Water Affairs and Environment<br />

Early Childhood Development<br />

Employee Assistance Programme<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment<br />

Expanded Public Works Programme<br />

Free Basic Electricity<br />

Free Basic Services<br />

Free Basic Water<br />

Food Insecurity and Vulnerability Information Management System<br />

Gross Geographic Product<br />

Human Immunodeficiency Virus<br />

Head Of Department<br />

Human Resource Development<br />

Human Resource Management<br />

Information Communication Technology<br />

Integrated Development Plan<br />

Integrated Environmental Management Plan<br />

Intergovernmental Relations<br />

Integrated Spatial Development Framework<br />

Integrated and Sustainable Rural Development<br />

Integrated Transport Plan<br />

Integrated Waste Management Plan<br />

Land Development Objectives<br />

Light Delivery Vehicle<br />

Local Economic Development<br />

Limpopo Department of Economic Development Environmental Affair and<br />

Tourism<br />

Limpopo Employment, Growth and Development Plan<br />

Limpopo Growth and Development Strategy<br />

Limpopo Business Support Agency<br />

Limpopo Economic Development Enterprise<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Living Standard Measures<br />

Limpopo Tourism Parks Board


17<br />

LUMS<br />

MDG<br />

MEC<br />

MIG<br />

MLL<br />

MM<br />

MPCC<br />

MRM<br />

MTEF<br />

MTSF<br />

NGO<br />

NLTTA<br />

NSDP<br />

OD<br />

OHS<br />

PGMs<br />

PHC<br />

PMS<br />

RAL<br />

RDP<br />

SANAC<br />

SAPS<br />

SARS<br />

SASSA<br />

SDBIP<br />

SDF<br />

SDM<br />

SMME<br />

SOPs<br />

STATSSA<br />

TDM<br />

URP<br />

WWTW<br />

WSA<br />

WSDP<br />

WSP<br />

Land Use Management System<br />

Millennium Development Goal<br />

Member of Executive Committee<br />

Municipal Infrastructure Grant<br />

Minimum Living Level<br />

Municipal Manager<br />

Multi-Purpose Community Centres<br />

Moral Regeneration Movement<br />

Medium Term Expenditure Framework<br />

Medium Term Strategic Framework<br />

Non-Governmental Organisation<br />

National Land Transport Transition Act<br />

National Spatial Development Perspective<br />

Organisational Development<br />

Occupational Health and Safety<br />

Platinum Group Metals<br />

Primary Health Care<br />

Performance Management System<br />

Roads Agency Limpopo<br />

Reconstruction and Development Programme<br />

South African National AIDS Council<br />

South African Police Services<br />

South African Revenue Services<br />

South African Social Security Agency<br />

Service Delivery Business Implementation Plan<br />

Spatial Development Framework<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Small, Medium and Micro Enterprise<br />

Standing Operating Procedures<br />

Statistics South Africa<br />

Travel Demand Management<br />

Urban Renewal Programme<br />

Waste Water Treatment Works<br />

Water Services Authority<br />

Water Services Development Plan<br />

Water Service Provider


18<br />

CHAPTER 1:<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

AND CONTEXT


19<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> is a strategic development tool to assist the municipality to achieve its developmental<br />

imperatives. The compilation of this <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> Integrated Development Planning (<strong>IDP</strong>) document for<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has followed both an extensive internal and external consultation<br />

of various respective public participation tools with communities and stakeholders within the<br />

parameters of the <strong>District</strong>’s sphere of operation. This document is a legislative mandate and a<br />

strategic planning instrument that guide and inform planning and development as well as decisions<br />

with regard to planning, management and development throughout the <strong>District</strong>. The Municipal<br />

Systems Act (2000) provides the legal framework for municipal development planning to assist<br />

Local Government (<strong>District</strong>) to discharge its mandates.<br />

1.1. POLICIES AND LEGAL PARAMETERS<br />

In formulating the <strong>IDP</strong> cognisance ought to be given to Global, National, Provincial and Local<br />

policy and legislative imperatives:<br />

1.1.1. GLOBAL IMPERATIVES<br />

Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)<br />

The United Nations Millennium Declaration committed global heads of states to making the right to<br />

development a reality for everyone and to freeing the entire human race from want. The<br />

Millennium declaration, signed by world’s leaders of 189 countries in 2000, established 2015 as<br />

the deadline for achieving most of the MDGs. The majorities of the MDGs targets have baseline of<br />

1990, and are set to monitor achievements over the period 1990-2015. The objective of the<br />

Declaration is to promote “a comprehensive approach and a coordinated strategy, tackling many<br />

problems simultaneously across a broad front”.<br />

The Declaration calls for halving by the year 2015, the number of people who live on less than one<br />

dollar a day (1993 PPP). This effort also involves finding solutions to hunger, malnutrition and<br />

disease, promoting gender equality and the empowerment of women, guaranteeing a basic


20<br />

education for everyone, and supporting the Agenda 21 principles of sustainable development.<br />

Vision 20<strong>14</strong> provides a series for socio-economic development milestones to ensure progressive<br />

attainment of development, which can be summed up as follows:<br />

· Access to basic water for all by 2008<br />

· Access to basic sanitation at RDP level by 2010<br />

· All schools and clinics have access to water and sanitation by 2007<br />

· Bucket toilet system to be eradicated by 2006<br />

· Electricity to all households by 2012<br />

· Halve unemployment by 20<strong>14</strong><br />

· Economic growth of 6% by 2010<br />

· Access to education and health care for all<br />

1.1.2. NATIONAL POLICIES AND IMPERATIVES<br />

1.1.2.1. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (Act 108 of 1996)<br />

Section 151 of the Constitution, states that developmental local government should make provision<br />

for a democratic and accountable government for local communities. Local government must<br />

promote a safe and healthy environment and encourage community involvement in matters of local<br />

government such as municipal health services, municipal transport, municipal roads, municipal<br />

parks and recreation.<br />

Section 152 states that local government should ensure the provision of services to communities in<br />

a sustainable manner and encourages the involvement of communities and community<br />

organizations in matters of local government.<br />

Section 153 states that each municipality should structure and manage its administration,<br />

budgeting and planning processes to give priority to the basic needs of the community.<br />

1.1.2.2. White Paper on Local Government (1998)


21<br />

It views the <strong>IDP</strong> as a way of achieving developmental local government. It establishes a basis for<br />

developmental local government in which “local government is committed to working with citizens<br />

and groups within the community to find sustainable ways to meet their social, economic and<br />

material needs and improve the quality of their lives’. It also encourages public consultation in<br />

policy formulation and in monitoring and evaluation of decision-making and implementation.<br />

1.1.2.3. Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of 2000)<br />

It regulates the <strong>IDP</strong>. It requires the municipality to undertake developmental oriented planning so<br />

as to ensure that it strives to achieve the objectives of local government set out in Section 152 and<br />

153 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Section 25 (1) requires the Municipal<br />

Council, within a prescribed period after the start of its elected term, to adopt a single, inclusive<br />

and strategic plan for the development of the municipality. Section 26 of the Act further outlines the<br />

core components of the <strong>IDP</strong> of a municipality.<br />

1.1.2.4. Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (Act 117 of 1998)<br />

Municipal Structures, Act 117 of 1998 provides for the establishment of municipalities, their internal<br />

structures and the division of powers between local and district municipalities. It gives district<br />

municipalities the responsibilities for <strong>IDP</strong> for the entire district area, including a framework for all<br />

local municipalities. <strong>District</strong> municipalities, have a responsibility for inter-local co-ordination, and for<br />

links with provincial and national departments. Local municipalities should produce plans that are<br />

aligned to the district plan. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is responsible to the planning activities<br />

of its local municipalities.<br />

1.1.2.5. Municipal Finance Management Act (Act 56 of 2003)<br />

The Municipal Finance Management Act 9 MFMA) was promulgated to sustain the finances of<br />

both the municipalities and other spheres of government. The Act also gives mandatory obligations<br />

on performance management system. Section 2 of the Act’s objectives is to secure sound and<br />

sustainable management of the financial affairs of the local government institutions to which this<br />

Act applies by establishing norms and standards.


22<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) budget process endeavors to comply to the provision of<br />

the MFMA. It is pertinent that the development of the <strong>IDP</strong> and the budget process are integrated<br />

and aligned as per legislation.<br />

1.1.2.6. Inter-Governmental Relations Framework Act (Act 13 of 2005)<br />

This Act responds to the limited successes of alignment amongst the three spheres of<br />

government. The Act creates a framework to support intergovernmental cooperation and<br />

coordination as required by the Constitution in its definition of “cooperative governance”. It<br />

compels all the three spheres of government to participate in the planning processes of the<br />

municipalities and in turn allow their own planning processes to be influenced by the municipal<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>s.<br />

Municipal <strong>IDP</strong>s are therefore the centres of planning for both provincial and national programmes<br />

in a specific local area. Municipalities participate in <strong>District</strong>-planning for a, Municipal Manager’s<br />

FORA and Mayor’s FORA as well as in the Premier’s Intergovernmental FORA to ensure proper<br />

alignment and coordination of Local, <strong>District</strong>, Provincial and National plans. The Act establishes<br />

structures and processes that enhance intergovernmental planning and monitoring processes that<br />

enhance intergovernmental planning and monitoring processes for Local, Provincial and National<br />

spheres of government.<br />

1.1.2.7. Development Facilitation Act (DFA) (Act 65 of 1995)<br />

The DFA has formalized the restructuring of urban settlements and planning in South Africa. Its<br />

aim has been to expedite land development projects and to promote efficient and integrated land<br />

development. It states that municipalities should prepare the land Development Objectives (LDOs)<br />

on an annual basis.<br />

1.1.2.8. The National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP)<br />

The National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP) (Presidency, 2006) is the primary spatial<br />

lens through which policymakers view socio-economic development in the country as a whole. It


<strong>23</strong><br />

presents a wide variety of socio-economic trends emerging in South Africa, and then draws<br />

inferences about how that emerging space economy should affect public investment (expenditure)<br />

in the immediate future.<br />

NSDP Principles<br />

Given the Government’s objectives of growing the economy, creating jobs, addressing poverty and<br />

promoting social cohesion, the NSDP assist government in confronting three fundamental planning<br />

questions:<br />

If Government were to prioritise investment and development spending in line with its goals and<br />

objectives, where would it invest/spend to achieve sustainable outcomes?<br />

Given the apartheid spatial configuration, what kinds of spatial arrangements are more conducive<br />

to the achievement of our goals of nation-building and of social and economic inclusion?<br />

How can government as a whole capitilise on complementaries and facilitate consistent decision<br />

making and move beyond focusing on integration and coordination procedures to establishing<br />

processes and mechanisms that will bring about strategic coordination, interaction and alignment?<br />

The NSDP thus puts forth the following set of five normative principles to address the above<br />

planning questions.<br />

• Principle 1<br />

Rapid economic growth that is sustained and inclusive is a prerequisite for the achievement of<br />

other policy objectives, among which poverty alleviation is key.<br />

• Principle 2<br />

Government has a Constitutional obligation to provide basic services to all citizens (e.g. water,<br />

electricity, health, education, etc.) wherever they reside.


24<br />

• Principle 3<br />

Beyond the Constitutional obligation identified in principle 2 above, government spending on fixed<br />

investment should be focused on localities of economic growth and/or economic potential, in order<br />

to gear up private sector investment, stimulate sustainable economic activities and create longterm<br />

employment opportunities.<br />

• Principle 4<br />

Efforts to address past and current social inequalities should focus on people, not places. In<br />

localities where there are both high level of poverty and demonstrated economic potential, this<br />

could include fixed capital investment beyond the provision of basic services to exploit the potential<br />

of those localities. In localities with low demonstrated economic potential, government should,<br />

beyond the provision of basic services, concentrate primarily on human capital development by<br />

providing education and training, social transfers such as grants and poverty-relief programmes. It<br />

should also reduce migration costs by providing labour-market intelligence to give people better<br />

information, opportunities and capabilities, to enable them to gravitate-if they choose to-to localities<br />

that are more likely to provide sustainable employment and economic opportunities.<br />

• Principle 5<br />

In order to overcome spatial distortions of apartheid, future settlement and economic development<br />

opportunities should be channeled into activity corridors and nodes that are adjacent to or that link<br />

to the main growth centres. Infrastructure investments should primarily support localities that will<br />

became major growth nodes in South Africa and the SADC region to create regional gateways to<br />

the global economy.<br />

These principles are aimed specifically at focusing government action and investment to achieve<br />

maximum social and economic impact within the context of limited resources.<br />

The diagram below illustrates


25<br />

Figure 1 - The NSDP principles and perspective informing the basis for robust analysis for<br />

the three spheres of government<br />

Source: National Spatial Development Perspective. The Presidency (2006)<br />

The NSDP indicates that each spheres of government has its own distinct development<br />

tasks and related planning frameworks corresponding to the scale of operations and the<br />

area of jurisdiction. For these frameworks to be coordinated and strategically aligned,<br />

each sphere will have to adopt the NSDP methodology and approach.<br />

1.1.2.9. The Medium-Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) (2009-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

The Medium-Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) endeavors to pinpoint important strategic<br />

preferences in order to put the country on a higher path in dealing with poverty and<br />

underdevelopment. It serves as a backdrop to guide planning and budgeting across the<br />

three spheres of government. It identifies few critical things that should be done to define a<br />

new trajectory for the country’s development.<br />

The following are the key objectives for 20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

ü<br />

Halve poverty and unemployment


26<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

Ensure a more equitable distribution of the benefits of economic growth and reduce<br />

inequality<br />

Improve the nation’s health profile and skills based and ensure universal access to<br />

basic services<br />

Improve the safety of citizens by reducing incidents of crime and corruption<br />

Build a nation free of all forms of racism, sexism, tribalism and xenophobia<br />

The priority areas to give effect to the above strategic objectives are:<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

More inclusive economic growth, decent work, and sustainable livelihoods<br />

Economic and social infrastructure<br />

Rural development, food security and land reform<br />

Access to quality education<br />

Improve health care<br />

The fight against crime and corruption<br />

Cohesive and sustainable communities<br />

To ensure capacity to meet these objectives, the following critical measures according to<br />

MTSF have to be adopted:<br />

· Cooperation among economic partners.<br />

· Strong partnership across all sectors.<br />

· Improving the system of monitoring and evaluation.<br />

· Focusing on economic development in areas with economic potential.<br />

· Recruiting and skilling law-enforcement agencies.<br />

1.1.2.10. Outcomes of Government<br />

In January 2010, Cabinet adopted 12 Outcomes within which to frame public-service<br />

delivery priorities and targets. All municipalities are expected to take the 12 outcomes into<br />

consideration when developing/reviewing their <strong>IDP</strong>s and their Annual Budgets.<br />

1. Improve the quality of basic education<br />

2. Improve health and life expectancy<br />

3. All people in South Africa protected and feel safe<br />

4. Decent employment through inclusive economic growth<br />

5. A skilled and capable workforce to support inclusive growth<br />

6. An efficient, competitive and responsive economic infrastructure network


27<br />

7. Vibrant, equitable and sustainable rural communities and food security<br />

8. Sustainable human settlements and improved quality of household life<br />

9. A response and, accountable, effective and efficient local government system<br />

10. Protection and enhancement of environmental assets and natural resources<br />

11. A better South Africa, a better and safer Africa and World<br />

12. A development-oriented public service and inclusive citizenship<br />

1.1.2.11. Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP)<br />

The principal objective of this programme is to launch and expand labour intensive<br />

projects that will provide opportunities for skills development to create an enabling<br />

environment for employment and self-employment. It will also assist in building capacity<br />

for the maintenance of infrastructure; provide community service and the development of a<br />

programme for Early Childhood Development (ECD). SDM, like other district in Limpopo,<br />

is gearing towards the effective implementation of EPWP programme and even expanding<br />

it to other sectors of the economy.<br />

1.1.2.12. Development of Small and Micro-Enterprises<br />

The enabling environment should be created through legislation to harness the<br />

entrepreneurial capabilities available in local communities. These capabilities would<br />

encourage self-employment and the employment of other job seekers. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has come with interventionist measures through LED Strategy to deal<br />

with the problem of unemployment.<br />

1.1.3. PROVINCIAL IMPERATIVES<br />

1.1.3.1. The Limpopo Employment, Growth and Development Plan<br />

(LEGDP) - 2009-20<strong>14</strong><br />

The Limpopo Employment, Growth and Development Plan (LEGDP) (Limpopo Province,<br />

2009-20<strong>14</strong>) is aimed at enhancing the competitive advantages of the province.<br />

Key Strategic Priorities<br />

The Limpopo Provincial Government has contextualized ten (10) Priority Areas as<br />

contained in the (MTSF) into key strategic priorities which will guide service delivery:


28<br />

‣ Ensuring more inclusive economic growth, decent work, and sustainable livelihoods<br />

‣ Economic and social infrastructure<br />

‣ Rural development, food security and land reform<br />

‣ Access to quality education<br />

‣ Improved health care<br />

‣ Fighting crime and corruption<br />

‣ Cohesive and sustainable communities<br />

‣ Creation of a better Africa and a better world<br />

‣ Sustainable resource management and use<br />

‣ A developmental state including improvement of public services<br />

Key Action Programmes<br />

To achieve the above priorities, the following action programmes have been identified:<br />

‣ Industrial Development Programme: Priority Growth Sector<br />

‣ Enterprise Development: SMMEs and Corporative Development Programme<br />

‣ Regional Economic Development and Integration Programme<br />

‣ Public Infrastructure Development Programme<br />

‣ Water Resource Development and Demand Management<br />

‣ Agriculture and Rural Development Programme<br />

‣ Education and Skills Development Programme<br />

‣ Health Care Development Programme<br />

‣ Safety and Security<br />

‣ Environmental and Natural Resources Development Programme<br />

‣ The Green Economy and creation of green jobs<br />

‣ Corporate Governance<br />

‣ ICT and Innovation Enabled Industries<br />

1.1.4. LOCAL IMPERATIVES<br />

1.1.4.1. 2025 Development Strategy (<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>’s Long-term Strategy)<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 2025 Development Strategy is an articulation of the longer term strategic<br />

direction to be pursued by the district as well as social partners in order to accelerate<br />

economic growth and enhance development in the district.


29<br />

The 2025 Development Strategy is aligned and harmonized with various mandatory plans<br />

prescribed in various pieces of legislations. In terms of hierarchy, the plans can be<br />

visualized as shown below:<br />

Figure 2 – Development Strategy<br />

2025<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

STRATEGY<br />

INTEGRATED<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

PLAN<br />

(<strong>IDP</strong>)<br />

SECTOR<br />

PLANS<br />

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SDBIP)<br />

SERVICE DELIVERY AND BUDGET<br />

- The 2025 Development Strategy charts a long-term strategic course and makes<br />

some of the bigger, overarching decisions about what the <strong>District</strong> ought to<br />

emphasize;<br />

- The Integrated Development Plan (<strong>IDP</strong>) defines what will be achieved in 5 years<br />

flowing from the strategy;


30<br />

- The Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan (SDBIP) articulates what will<br />

be done in 1 year.<br />

The 2025 Development strategy is structured into three components:<br />

· Baseline Research: Trends analysis in various thematic issues that are<br />

considered as shaping the district’s present and future. These include a whole<br />

range of social, economic, political and environmental trends;<br />

· Scenarios: Four scenarios on different types of futures that might be experienced<br />

in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> depending on particular choice of policy positions;<br />

· Investment Plans: Detailed short-to-medium term priority plans to be pursued by<br />

the district.<br />

1.1.4.2. Key Sector Plans<br />

The SDM recognized the need to develop future strategies, policies and plans which seek<br />

to deal with specific issues that will facilitate a progressive realization of the desired<br />

developmental trajectory of the <strong>District</strong>. A closer analysis of all these strategies and plans<br />

will show a greater degree of alignment of all the guidelines and development directives<br />

outlined in the government policy frameworks above.<br />

For the past few years, the SDM has developed numerous sectoral strategic and<br />

operational plans together with policies as joint venture with all local municipalities within<br />

the <strong>District</strong> as outlined below:<br />

Local Economic Development and Job Creation<br />

· Local Economic Development Strategy<br />

· Marketing Strategy<br />

· Tourism Development Strategy<br />

· Human Resource Development Strategy<br />

· Formalisation of Cultural & Historical Heritage Sites


31<br />

Integrated Environmental Management Plan<br />

· Environmental Report<br />

· Disaster Management Plan<br />

· Spatial Development Framework<br />

· Land Use Management Systems<br />

Infrastructure Provision and Service Delivery<br />

· Water Master Plan<br />

· Infrastructure Maintenance Plan<br />

· Integrated Waste Management Plan<br />

· Integrated Transport Plan<br />

Community Participation and IGR<br />

· Community Participation Policy<br />

· SDM Communication Strategy<br />

1.1.5. POWERS AND FUNCTIONS<br />

The SDM has assumed responsibilities in several powers, duties and functions at the local<br />

municipalities due to capacity and establishment constraints. Functions such as water and<br />

sanitation, waste management and disaster management are the responsibilities of the district.<br />

Local Municipalities are considered as the low capacity municipalities. The district must devise a<br />

long-term capacitating strategy for the concerned municipalities to enable them to perform these<br />

functions.<br />

• Water<br />

• Sanitation<br />

• Fire fighting<br />

• Local Tourism<br />

• Municipal Airport except for Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi<br />

• Municipal Planning<br />

• Municipal Health Services<br />

• Municipal Public Transport


32<br />

• Markets<br />

• Municipal Roads for Fetakgomo<br />

• Storm water for Tubatse, Makhuduthamaga and Fetakgomo<br />

• Cemeteries except for Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi<br />

• Municipal Abattoirs<br />

• Refuse removal, refuse dumps and solid waste disposal for Fetakgomo<br />

The powers and functions are reviewed annually after capacity assessments by the Municipal<br />

Demarcation Board, which informs MEC Adjustment Report. The above powers and functions refer<br />

to MEC Adjustment report of the 2008/09 Financial Year – which do not necessarily reflect the<br />

current situation.<br />

Municipal Demarcation Board is currently reviewing the whole Capacity Assessment Model,<br />

considering the following limitations:<br />

- Clarity on underlying processes and drivers of the model: a primary concern relating to<br />

the approach is that the detail underlying the model is not fully explained. The reader or<br />

user of the model (which could include the MEC or other provincial representatives) is not<br />

provided with the relevant information to fully understand which variables inform the<br />

determination of whether a municipality has capacity or not. Furthermore it is not clear what<br />

processes were followed in reaching the determination of capacity levels.<br />

- Limitations related to the conceptualisation of capacity: the concern with this approach<br />

is that the model lacks a robust and comprehensive basis upon which to inform a) the<br />

assessment and understanding of capacity levels within and across municipalities and b)<br />

make recommendations for the adjustment of powers and functions.<br />

- Measurement and interpretation issues: it fails to assess the ability to spend, which is<br />

one indicator of a municipality‘s capacity to deliver services and perform functions,<br />

insufficient understanding of the extent of capacity shortcomings, there is a need to assess<br />

actual capacity levels in addition to asking about perceived access to resources.<br />

- Assessing performance: lack of benchmarks against which to assess, lack of<br />

differentiation, insufficient scope for understanding the ‘why’


33<br />

- Limitations of quantitative assessments: The quality of the data is highly dependent on<br />

the measurements used and the extent to which the indicators link to a clearly defined<br />

conceptual framework.<br />

The explanatory power of quantitative data is limited to the variables being tested in the<br />

survey. Because surveys focus on narrow, highly specified areas of inquiry and rely on<br />

structured responses mainly, they are highly limited in terms of the detail they provide and<br />

by their very design are not meant to provide depth and breadth.<br />

It is therefore prudent that powers be approached cautiously as a guide than being instructive.


1.2. MEC’S COMMENTS<br />

MEC for Local Government and Housing’s Comments on 2012/13 <strong>IDP</strong> review<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREAS BROAD DISTRICT FINDINGS GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

KPA 1. Spatial Rationale<br />

All municipalities in the district have indicated their spatial<br />

analysis information and hierarchy of settlements, spatial<br />

strategic objectives, projects and Spatial Development<br />

Frameworks (SDFs) and all the local municipalities<br />

indicated their Land Use Management Schemes (LUMS)<br />

All municipalities should continue to indicate their spatial analysis<br />

information and hierarchy of settlements, spatial strategic objectives,<br />

projects and Spatial Development Frameworks (SDFs) and all the local<br />

municipalities indicated their Land Use Management Schemes (LUMS)<br />

KPA 2: Infrastructure and Basic Service Delivery<br />

Water and sanitation<br />

Energy and Electricity<br />

Roads, Storm Water Drainage and<br />

Public Transport<br />

All municipalities have indicated their water and sanitation<br />

challenges and backlogs, strategic objectives and<br />

strategies, projects. All municipalities in the district have<br />

not mention the availability of the <strong>District</strong>’s Water Services<br />

Development Plan in their <strong>IDP</strong>s.<br />

All municipalities have clearly indicated their electricity<br />

backlogs as well as the provision of Free Basic Electricity<br />

(FBE). They further highlighted their strategic objectives<br />

and strategies as well as energy projects. However, they<br />

did not indicate Energy Master Plans as they are not<br />

performing the electricity provisioning function.<br />

All municipalities have indicated their backlogs on roads,<br />

storm water drainage and public transport challenges.<br />

They have also outlined their strategic objectives,<br />

strategies and funded projects. Greater <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> and<br />

Ephraim Mogale have Roads Master Plans, whereas<br />

Makhuduthamaga has a Draft Roads Master Plan.<br />

All Municipalities should continue to highlight their water and sanitation<br />

challenges and backlogs in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review. All municipalities in the<br />

district should indicate that their water and sanitation issues are<br />

addressed by the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> through the <strong>District</strong><br />

Water Services Development Plan (WSDP) in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review.<br />

All municipalities should continue to highlight electricity backlogs as well<br />

as the provision of Free Basic Electricity (FBE). They should also<br />

indicate electricity strategic objectives and strategies as well as projects<br />

in the next review . <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should liaise with<br />

Eskom for the development of district-wide framework for the provision<br />

of electricity and assist local municipalities with development of the<br />

Energy Master Plans.<br />

All municipalities should keep on reflecting their roads, storm water<br />

drainage and public transport challenges, strategic objectives, strategies<br />

and funded projects as well as classification on road network in the next<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> review. Municipalities with appropriate powers and function should<br />

develop and adopt Roads Master Plans in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review.


35<br />

Waste Management<br />

KPA 3:Local Economic Development<br />

KPA 4: Good Governance and<br />

Public Participation<br />

KPA 5: Financial Viability<br />

KPA 6: Municipal Transformation &<br />

Organizational Development<br />

All municipalities in the district have provided a clear and<br />

coherent analysis on waste management, strategic<br />

objectives, strategies and funded projects. All<br />

municipalities in the district have indicated the availability<br />

of Integrated Waste Management Plans.<br />

All municipalities in the district have provided a clear and<br />

coherent economic analysis, LED strategic objectives and<br />

strategies, and funded projects and LED Strategies in their<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>s. It is, however, noted that these strategies are<br />

outdated. The strategies for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> and<br />

Ephraim Mogale Municipalities were developed in 2008,<br />

whereas those of Makhuduthamaga, Elias Motsoaledi and<br />

Greater Tubatse (which is a Provincial Growth Point) were<br />

developed in 2007.<br />

All municipalities in the district have provided a clear<br />

analysis of good governance issues, strategic objectives<br />

and strategies, as well as funded projects. However, the<br />

Makhuduthamaga <strong>Municipality</strong> did not indicate the<br />

existence of Supply Chain Committee, Complaints<br />

Management System as well as the Risk Management<br />

Strategy.<br />

All municipalities have provided a clear and coherent<br />

analysis of their financial capacities and challenges,<br />

strategic objectives and strategies, funded projects 3 Year<br />

MTEF.<br />

All municipalities have provided a clear and coherent<br />

analysis of their institutional capacities and challenges,<br />

strategic objectives and objectives, funded projects.<br />

However, the municipalities in the district did not indicate<br />

the availability of Municipal Institutional Plan<br />

All municipalities should maintain the status quo by indicating waste<br />

management challenges, backlogs, strategic objectives and strategies<br />

as well as funded projects and Integrated Waste Management Plan in<br />

the next <strong>IDP</strong> review.<br />

All municipalities in the district should continue to provide a clear and<br />

coherent economic analysis of their municipal areas, strategic objectives<br />

and strategies, funded projects and LED Strategies in the next <strong>IDP</strong><br />

review. It is also recommended that municipalities review their LED<br />

Strategies and align them with the LEGDP, New Growth Path and the<br />

National Development Plan during the next <strong>IDP</strong> review.<br />

All municipalities should continue to provide a clear analysis of good<br />

governance issues, strategic objectives and strategies as well as funded<br />

good governance and public participation projects in the next <strong>IDP</strong><br />

review.<br />

All municipalities should maintain the status quo by providing a clear<br />

and coherent analysis of their financial capacities and challenges,<br />

strategic objectives and strategies, funded projects, 3 Year MTEF as<br />

well as the 5 Financial Plans in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review.<br />

All municipalities should continue to provide a clear and coherent<br />

analysis of their institutional capacities and challenges, strategic<br />

objectives and objectives, funded projects in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review. All<br />

municipalities should review and highlight their Municipal Institutional<br />

Plans in the next <strong>IDP</strong> review in liaison with COGHSTA, SALGA and<br />

DBSA.


36<br />

1.3. AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORT<br />

Auditor-general’s report to the Limpopo provincial legislature and the council on <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

district municipality report on the financial statements<br />

Introduction<br />

1. I was engaged to audit the financial statements of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>,<br />

which comprise the statement of financial position as at 30 June 2012, the statements of<br />

financial performance, changes in net assets and cash flows for the year then ended,<br />

and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and<br />

the accounting authority’s report, as set out in the report.<br />

Accounting Officer’s responsibility for the financial statements<br />

2. The accounting officer is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these<br />

financial statements in accordance with South African Standards of Generally<br />

Recognised Accounting Practice (SA Standards of GRAP) and the requirements of the<br />

Municipal Finance Management Act of South Africa, 2003 (Act No. 56 of 2003) (MFMA),<br />

Division of Revenue Act, 2011 (Act No. 6 of 2011) (DoRA) and for such internal control<br />

as the accounting officer determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial<br />

statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.<br />

Auditor-General’s responsibility<br />

3. My responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on<br />

conducting the audit in accordance with the Public Audit Act of South Africa, 2004 (Act<br />

No. 25 of 2004) (PAA), the General Notice issued in terms thereof and International<br />

Standards on Auditing. Because of the matters described in the Basis for disclaimer of<br />

opinion paragraphs, I was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to<br />

provide a basis for an audit opinion.<br />

Basis for disclaimer of opinion<br />

Commitments<br />

4. Included in commitments of R416 755 179 as disclosed in note 33 to the financial<br />

statements is R24 110 654 for which no supporting documentation could be provided.<br />

The municipality’s records did not permit the application of alternative audit procedures.<br />

Consequently, I was unable to determine whether any adjustments to commitments were<br />

necessary.<br />

General expenditure


37<br />

5. Included in general expenditure of R167 012 250 as disclosed in note 22 to the financial<br />

statements, are payments amounting to R5 349 013 accounted for in the current<br />

financial year that related to the 2010-11 financial year. Consequently general<br />

expenditure is overstated by R5 349 013 and surplus for the period is understated by the<br />

same amount.<br />

6. I was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence for the restatement in the<br />

corresponding figure of general expenditure. As described in note 22 to the financial<br />

statements, the restatement of R22 252 342 was made in order to rectify a prior year<br />

misstatement. I was unable to confirm the restatement by alternative means.<br />

Consequently, I was unable to determine whether any adjustments to the general<br />

expenditure corresponding figure were necessary.<br />

Property, plant and equipment<br />

7. Included in property, plant and equipment of R3 418 051 670 as disclosed in note 3 to<br />

the financial statements, is an amount of R3 007 852 <strong>23</strong>6 relating to opening balances<br />

for which no supporting documentation could be provided. The municipality’s records did<br />

not permit the application of alternative audit procedures. Consequently, I was unable to<br />

determine whether any adjustments to the property, plant and equipment in the financial<br />

statements were necessary.<br />

8. The municipality could not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support work<br />

in progress of R9 878 412 (2011: R1 458 871). Consequently I did not obtain sufficient<br />

appropriate audit evidence to satisfy myself as to the valuation, existence and<br />

classification of projects in progress of R9 878 412 (2011: R1 458 871).<br />

9. The municipality did not unbundle the infrastructure assets stated at R15 257 307 in<br />

accordance with SA Standards of GRAP 17, Property, plant and equipment.<br />

Consequently, I was unable to determine whether any adjustments to the property, plant<br />

and equipment in the financial statements were necessary.<br />

10. The municipality did not review the residual values and useful lives of property, plant and<br />

equipment at each reporting date in accordance with SA Standards of GRAP 17,<br />

Property, plant and equipment. The municipality’s records did not permit the application<br />

of alternative audit procedures. Consequently, the impact on the carrying value of<br />

property, plant and equipment and the corresponding effect on accumulated surplus in<br />

terms of SA Standards of GRAP 3, Accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates<br />

and errors as disclosed in the statement of financial position could not be determined.<br />

11. Roads and storm water assets of R836 580 893, as disclosed in note 3 to the financial<br />

statements, does not agree to the balance of R1 300 190 473 per the fixed asset<br />

register. The municipality did not reconcile the difference of R463 609 580 between the<br />

financial statements and the underlying records. Consequently, depreciation is<br />

understated and the surplus for the year is overstated by R463 609 580.


38<br />

12. SA Standards of GRAP 17, Property, plant and equipment requires that subsequent to<br />

initial recognition at cost, an item of property, plant and equipment should be carried at<br />

cost less accumulated depreciation less accumulated impairment losses. The<br />

municipality did not calculate or consider impairment losses on its infrastructure assets.<br />

Consequently, I was unable to determine whether any adjustments to the property, plant<br />

and equipment in the financial statements were necessary.<br />

Depreciation<br />

13. Depreciation stated at R62 269 407, as disclosed in note 28 to the financial statements,<br />

does not agree to the balance of R68 792 882 per the fixed asset register. The<br />

municipality did not reconcile the difference of R6 5<strong>23</strong> 475 between the financial<br />

statements and the underlying records. Consequently, depreciation is understated and<br />

the surplus for the year is overstated by R6 5<strong>23</strong> 475.<br />

Trade payables<br />

<strong>14</strong>. The municipality could not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence to substantiate<br />

trade payables amounting to R81 876 358 and as disclosed in note 17 to the financial<br />

statement. There was no system of control to reconcile the supplier statements with the<br />

payments made. The municipality’s records did not permit the application of alternative<br />

audit procedures regarding the trade payables account. Consequently, I was unable to<br />

determine whether any adjustments to the trade payables in the financial statements<br />

were necessary.<br />

Irregular expenditure<br />

15. No system was in place for the identification and recognition of irregular expenditure and<br />

there were no satisfactory alternative audit procedures that I could perform to obtain<br />

reasonable assurance that all irregular expenditure was properly recorded. Payments<br />

amounting to R82 743 432 were made in contravention of the supply chain management<br />

regulations. The amount was not included in irregular expenditure, disclosed in note 40<br />

to the financial statements. Furthermore, the municipality could not provide sufficient<br />

appropriate audit evidence to prove that the allocation of contracts amounting to<br />

R26 220 687 were awarded in accordance with supply chain management regulations.<br />

Consequently, I was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to satisfy<br />

myself as to the completeness of irregular expenditure as disclosed in note 40 to the<br />

financial statements amounting to R63 <strong>14</strong>4 022 (2012) and R215 878 250 (2011).<br />

Value Added Tax (VAT)<br />

16. The municipality entered into an agency agreement with its local municipalities for the<br />

provision of water services. As the principal, the municipality has not accounted for VAT<br />

on the water transactions in contravention with the VAT act. The municipality did not


39<br />

account for input tax on the agency fees for the services rendered in contravention with<br />

VAT act.<br />

17. Furthermore no supporting documentation could be provided for VAT accruals of<br />

R15 126 700. The municipality’s records did not permit the application of alternative<br />

procedures regarding the VAT disclosed in the financial statements. Consequently, I was<br />

unable to determine the correct amount of the VAT receivable balance of R32 083 617<br />

(2012) and R105 094 421 (2011) as disclosed in note 10 to the financial statements.<br />

Presentation and disclosure of financial statements<br />

18. SA Standards of GRAP 1, Presentation of financial statements, paragraph 19 (b) and (c)<br />

requires that financial statements should provide information, including accounting<br />

policies, presented in a manner which is relevant, reliable, comparable and<br />

understandable. In addition, additional disclosures should be made when compliance<br />

with the specific requirements in SA Standards of GRAP are insufficient to enable users<br />

to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the<br />

entity’s financial position and financial performance. The following non compliances were<br />

identified:<br />

· Budget information as required by SA Standards of GRAP 1 has been disclosed<br />

in Appendix E1 to the financial statements, no reference has been made of this in<br />

a note to the financial statements as required by SA Standards of GRAP.<br />

· Councillors remuneration has not been disclosed in terms of section 124(1)(a)<br />

and (b) of the MFMA.<br />

· Financial risk management as required by IAS 32, financial instruments:<br />

Disclosure and presentation was not disclosed in the annual financial statements.<br />

Distribution losses<br />

19. Section 125 (2) (d) (i) of the MFMA requires that the notes to the annual financial<br />

statements of a municipality must disclose the particulars of any material losses.<br />

Contrary to these requirements, the municipality did not disclose the water distribution<br />

losses as required by the MFMA.<br />

Disclaimer of opinion<br />

20. Because of the significance of the matters described in the Basis for disclaimer of<br />

opinion paragraphs, I have not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence<br />

to provide a basis for an audit opinion. Accordingly, I do not express an opinion on the<br />

financial statements.<br />

Emphasis of matters


40<br />

21. I draw attention to the matters below. My opinion is not modified in respect of these<br />

matters<br />

Restatement of corresponding figures<br />

22. As disclosed in note 36 to the financial statements, the corresponding figures for<br />

30 June 2011 have been restated as a result of an error discovered during 2012 in the<br />

financial statements of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> at, and for the year ended,<br />

30 June 2011.<br />

Material impairments<br />

<strong>23</strong>. As disclosed in note 26 to the financial statements, material impairments to the amount<br />

of R11 632 340 were incurred as a result of impairment of irrecoverable trade debtors.<br />

Additional matter<br />

24. I draw attention to the matter below. My opinion is not modified in respect of this matter:<br />

Unaudited supplementary schedules<br />

25. The supplementary information set out on pages X to X does not form part of the<br />

financial statements and is presented as additional information. I have not audited these<br />

schedules and, accordingly, I do not express an opinion thereon.<br />

Planned targets not achieved<br />

26. Of the total number of planned targets, 170 targets were not achieved during the year<br />

under review. This represents 79% of total planned targets that were not achieved during<br />

the year under review. This was mainly due to the fact that targets were planned for<br />

during the strategic planning process before the required funds were secured.<br />

REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS<br />

27. In accordance with the PAA and the General Notice issued in terms thereof, I report the<br />

following findings relevant to performance against predetermined objectives, compliance<br />

with laws and regulations and internal control, but not for the purpose of expressing an<br />

opinion.<br />

Predetermined objectives<br />

28. I performed procedures to obtain evidence about the usefulness and reliability of the<br />

information in the annual performance report as set out on pages XX to XX of the annual<br />

report.


41<br />

29. The reported performance against predetermined objectives was evaluated against the<br />

overall criteria of usefulness and reliability. The usefulness of information in the annual<br />

performance report relates to whether it is presented in accordance with the National<br />

Treasury annual reporting principles and whether the reported performance is consistent<br />

with the planned development priorities. The usefulness of information further relates to<br />

whether indicators and targets are measurable (i.e. well defined, verifiable, specific,<br />

measurable and time bound) and relevant as required by the National Treasury<br />

Framework for managing programme performance information (FMPPI).<br />

The reliability of the information in respect of the selected development priorities is assessed<br />

to determine whether it adequately reflects the facts (i.e. whether it is valid, accurate and<br />

complete).<br />

30. The material findings are as follows<br />

Usefulness of information<br />

Presentation<br />

Measures taken to improve performance not disclosed<br />

31. Improvement measures in the annual performance report for a total of 100% of the<br />

planned targets not achieved were not disclosed as required by section 46 of the<br />

Municipal Systems Act (MSA). These targets related to the development priorities on<br />

access to basic services and infrastructure development, community development and<br />

social cohesion, and economic growth, development and job creation, effective,<br />

accountable and clean government, active community participation and<br />

intergovernmental co-operation, and the spatial development and sustainable land use.<br />

This was due to inadequate monitoring done to identify the root causes of the underperformance.<br />

Consistency<br />

Reported objectives, indicators and targets not consistent with planned objectives,<br />

indicators and targets<br />

32. The MSA, section 41(c) requires that the actual achievements against all planned<br />

indicators and targets must be reported annually. The annual performance report<br />

submitted for audit purposes did not include the actual performance of 100% of the<br />

reported objectives, 43% of the related performance indicators and 40% of the related<br />

performance targets specified in the integrated development plan for the year under<br />

review. This was due to lack of or limited information systems recording and<br />

documenting of actual achievements against targets. This is the result of management<br />

not having properly reviewed the reported objectives, indicators and targets to ensure<br />

that they are consistent with the integrated development plan.<br />

Measurability<br />

Performance indicators are not well defined


42<br />

33. The National Treasury’s FMPPI requires that performance indicators should have clear<br />

and unambiguous data definitions so that data can be collected consistently and is easy<br />

to understand and use. A total of 61% of performance indicators for the development<br />

priorities on access to basic services and infrastructure development, community<br />

development and social cohesion, and economic growth, development and job creation<br />

were not well defined in that clear, unambiguous data definitions were not available to<br />

allow for data to be collected consistently. This was due to the fact that management<br />

was aware of the requirements of the FMPPI but did not receive the necessary training<br />

to enable application of the principles.<br />

Reliability of information<br />

Reported performance not valid<br />

34. The National Treasury’s FMPPI requires that processes and systems which produce the<br />

indicator should be verifiable. A total of 60% of the actual reported performance relevant<br />

to the selected objectives on access to basic services and infrastructure development,<br />

community development and social cohesion, and economic growth, development and<br />

job creation were not valid or differed materially when compared to the source<br />

information and/or evidence provided. This was due to a lack of standard operating<br />

procedures for the recording of actual achievements and proper monitoring of<br />

performance.<br />

Reported performance not accurate<br />

35. The FMPPI requires that the indicator be accurate enough for its intended use and<br />

respond to changes in the level of performance. A total of 60% of the actual reported<br />

performance relevant to the selected objectives on access to basic services and<br />

infrastructure development, community development and social cohesion, and economic<br />

growth, development and job creation were not accurate when compared to source<br />

information. This was due to a lack of standard operating procedures for the recording of<br />

actual achievements and proper monitoring of performance.<br />

Compliance with laws and regulations<br />

36. I performed procedures to obtain evidence that the entity has complied with applicable<br />

laws and regulations regarding financial matters, financial management and other related<br />

matters. My findings on material non-compliance with specific matters in key applicable<br />

laws and regulations as set out in the General Notice issued in terms of the PAA are as<br />

follows:<br />

Strategic planning and performance management


43<br />

37. The parent municipality with sole control of a municipal entity did not ensure that annual<br />

performance objectives and indicators for the municipal entity are established by<br />

agreement with the municipal entity as required by section 93B(a) of the MSA.<br />

38. The municipality did not:<br />

· set appropriate key performance indicators as a yardstick for measuring<br />

performance, including outcomes and impact, with regard to the municipality’s<br />

development priorities and objectives set out in its integrated development plan,<br />

· set measurable performance targets with regard to each development<br />

priority/objective and monitor performance, with regard to each of those<br />

development priorities and objectives and against the key performance indicators<br />

and targets set<br />

· measure and review performance at least once per year, with regard to each of<br />

those development priorities and objectives and against the key performance<br />

indicators and targets set<br />

· take steps to improve performance with regard to those development priorities<br />

and objectives where performance targets are not met as required by section 41<br />

of the MSA.<br />

Annual financial statements, performance and annual report<br />

39. The financial statements submitted for auditing were not prepared in all material respects<br />

in accordance with the requirements of section 122 of the MFMA.<br />

40. Material misstatements of non-current assets, current assets, liabilities, revenue,<br />

expenditure, and disclosure items identified by the auditors in the submitted financial<br />

statements were subsequently corrected and the supporting records were provided<br />

subsequently, but the uncorrected material misstatements and supporting records that<br />

could not be provided resulted in the financial statements receiving a disclaimer audit<br />

opinion.<br />

41. The accounting officer did not submit the financial statements for auditing within two<br />

months after the end of the financial year, as required by section 126(1)(a) of the MFMA.<br />

42. The annual performance report for the year under review does not include a comparison<br />

of the performance with set targets and a comparison with the previous financial year<br />

measures taken to improve performance, as required by section 46 (1)(a), (b)and (c) of<br />

the MSA.<br />

Procurement and contract management<br />

43. Sufficient appropriate audit evidence could not be obtained that goods and services with<br />

a transaction value of below R200 000 were procured by means of obtaining the required<br />

price quotations, as required by Supply Chain Management (SCM) regulation 17(a) and<br />

(c)


44<br />

44. Invitations for competitive bidding were not always advertised for a required minimum<br />

period of <strong>14</strong> days, as required by SCM regulation 22(1) and 22(2).<br />

45. Sufficient appropriate audit evidence could not be obtained that bids were evaluated by<br />

bid evaluation committees which were composed of officials from the departments<br />

requiring the goods or services and at least one SCM practitioner of the municipality as<br />

required by SCM regulation 28(2).<br />

46. Sufficient appropriate audit evidence could not be obtained that contracts and quotations<br />

were awarded to bidders based on points given for criteria that were stipulated in the<br />

original invitation for bidding and quotations, as required by SCM regulations 21(b) and<br />

28(1)(a) and Preferential Procurement Regulations.<br />

47. Construction projects were not always registered with the Construction Industry<br />

Development Board (CIDB), as required by section 22 of the CIDB Act and CIDB<br />

regulation 18.<br />

48. Contracts were awarded to bidders who did not submit a declaration on whether they are<br />

employed by the state or connected to any person employed by the state, as required by<br />

SCM regulation 13(c).<br />

49. Awards were made to providers who are persons in service of other state institutions, in<br />

contravention of SCM regulation 44. Similar awards were identified in the prior year and<br />

no effective steps were taken to prevent or combat the abuse of the SCM process in<br />

accordance with SCM regulation 38(1).<br />

Expenditure management<br />

50. Sufficient appropriate audit evidence could not be obtained that money owing by the<br />

municipality had always been paid within 30 days of receiving an invoice or statement,<br />

as required by section 65(2)(e) of the MFMA.<br />

51. The accounting officer did not take effective steps to prevent unauthorised expenditure,<br />

irregular expenditure and fruitless and wasteful expenditure, as required by section 62(1)<br />

(d) of the MFMA.<br />

52. An adequate management, accounting and information system was not in place which<br />

recognised expenditure when it was incurred, accounted for creditors and accounted for<br />

payments made, as required by section 65(2)(b) of the MFMA.<br />

Asset management<br />

53. An adequate management, accounting and information system which accounts for<br />

assets was not in place, as required by section 63(2)(a) of the MFMA.


45<br />

54. An effective system of internal control for assets was not in place, as required by section<br />

63(2) (c) of the MFMA.<br />

Liability management<br />

55. An effective system of internal control for liabilities (including a liability register) was not<br />

in place, as required by section 63(2) (c) of the MFMA.<br />

INTERNAL CONTROL<br />

56. I considered internal control relevant to my audit of the financial statements, annual<br />

performance report and compliance with laws and regulations. The matters reported<br />

below under the fundamentals of internal control are limited to the significant deficiencies<br />

that resulted in findings on the annual performance report and the findings on<br />

compliance with laws and regulations included in this report.<br />

Leadership<br />

· The accounting officer did not exercise oversight responsibility over compliance with<br />

laws and regulations and reporting on predetermined objectives and the enforcement<br />

of supply chain management regulations.<br />

· The accounting officer did not establish an IT governance framework that supports<br />

and enables service delivery.<br />

· Management did not implement effective HR management to ensure that adequate<br />

and sufficiently skilled resources are in place and that performance is monitored.<br />

Financial and performance management<br />

· The accounting officer did not implement proper record keeping in a timely manner to<br />

ensure that complete, relevant and accurate information is accessible and available<br />

to support financial and performance reporting.<br />

· The accounting officer did not implement adequate controls over daily and monthly<br />

processing and reconciling of transactions.<br />

· The accounting officer did not prepare regular, accurate and complete financial<br />

reports that are supported and evidenced by reliable information.<br />

· Management did not design and implement formal controls over IT systems to<br />

ensure the reliability of the systems and the availability, accuracy and protection of<br />

information.<br />

· Standard operating procedures for performance information are not comprehensively<br />

documented.<br />

Governance


46<br />

· Management ineffectiveness in implementing recommendations from internal and<br />

external audit did not enable the audit committee to promote accountability and<br />

service delivery through evaluating and monitoring responses to risks and providing<br />

oversight over the effectiveness of the internal control environment, including<br />

financial and performance reporting and compliance with laws and regulations.<br />

OTHER REPORTS<br />

Investigations<br />

57. An investigation is being conducted to probe possible supply chain management<br />

irregularities. The investigation aims to establish whether the supply chain management<br />

process has been implemented in terms of the prescribed supply chain management<br />

process. The investigation was still on-going at the reporting date.


AUDIT ACTION PLAN FOR 2011/2012 AUDIT REPORT BY SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />

Finances<br />

Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />

Person<br />

Target Date<br />

Progress<br />

4 Included in commitments of<br />

R416 755 179 as disclosed in<br />

note 33 to the financial<br />

statements is R24 110 654 for<br />

which no supporting<br />

documentation could be<br />

provided.<br />

· <strong>Review</strong> the commitment<br />

listing against allocated<br />

budget vs budget expended<br />

to date.<br />

· Ensure that supporting<br />

documentation for budget<br />

expended to date exists.<br />

· Search for documents that<br />

were not submitted during the<br />

audit<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong>


48<br />

Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />

Person<br />

Target Date<br />

Progress<br />

5 Included in general expenditure<br />

of R167 012 250 as disclosed in<br />

note 22 to the financial<br />

statements, are payments<br />

amounting to R5 349 013<br />

accounted for in the current<br />

financial year that related to the<br />

2010-11 financial year.<br />

Consequently<br />

general<br />

expenditure is overstated by R5<br />

349 013 and surplus for the<br />

period is understated by the<br />

same amount.<br />

6 I was unable to obtain sufficient<br />

appropriate audit evidence for<br />

the restatement in the<br />

corresponding figure of general<br />

expenditure. As described in<br />

note 22 to the financial<br />

statements, the restatement of<br />

R22 252 342 was made in order<br />

to rectify a prior year<br />

misstatement.<br />

7 Included in property, plant and<br />

equipment of R3 418 051 670<br />

as disclosed in note 3 to the<br />

· Check the whole population<br />

for similar transactions<br />

· Correct the error as required<br />

by GRAP 3/ restate the<br />

financial statements<br />

· Part of accumulated surplus<br />

reconciliation<br />

· <strong>Review</strong> the adjusting journals<br />

passed<br />

· Confirm the authenticity of the<br />

journal<br />

· Compile supporting<br />

documents for the journal<br />

Appointment of the service provider<br />

to address the following:<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong>


49<br />

Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />

Person<br />

Target Date<br />

Progress<br />

financial statements, is an<br />

amount of R3 007 852 <strong>23</strong>6<br />

relating to opening balances for<br />

which no supporting<br />

documentation could be<br />

provided<br />

· Ensure that developed<br />

methodology on recognition,<br />

fair valuing and write down is<br />

discussed with AG(SA)<br />

· Write down assets recognized<br />

as at 30 June 2009<br />

· Recognition and fair valuing<br />

of all infrastructure assets<br />

acquired prior 30 June 2009<br />

8 The municipality could not<br />

provide sufficient appropriate<br />

audit evidence to support work<br />

in progress of R9 878 412<br />

(2011: R1 458 871<br />

· Locate outstanding<br />

documents for 2010/11 and<br />

2011/12.<br />

· Contact service providers for<br />

provision of outstanding<br />

documentation<br />

· Alternative procedure to be<br />

followed for valuation where<br />

supporting documents cannot<br />

be located<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

9 The municipality did not<br />

unbundle the infrastructure<br />

assets stated at R15 257 307 in<br />

accordance with SA Standards<br />

· Unbudle Ratau and Tjebeng<br />

projects and projects<br />

completed within the current<br />

financial year (2012/<strong>2013</strong>)<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong>


50<br />

Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />

Person<br />

Target Date<br />

Progress<br />

of GRAP 17, Property, plant and<br />

equipment.<br />

· Reconcile unbundled report<br />

for Ratau and Tjebeng with<br />

FAR.<br />

10 The municipality did not review<br />

the residual values and useful<br />

lives of property, plant and<br />

equipment at each reporting<br />

date in accordance with SA<br />

Standards of GRAP 17,<br />

Property, plant and equipment.<br />

· <strong>Review</strong> and assess estimated<br />

useful and economic lives of<br />

property plant and equipment<br />

· Determine the residual<br />

values of property, plant and<br />

equipment<br />

· Update the accounting policy<br />

of the municipality<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

11 Roads and storm water assets<br />

of R836 580 893, as disclosed<br />

in note 3 to the financial<br />

statements, does not agree to<br />

the balance of R1 300 190 473<br />

per the fixed asset register. The<br />

municipality did not reconcile the<br />

difference of R463 609 580<br />

between the financial<br />

statements and the underlying<br />

records. Consequently,<br />

depreciation is understated and<br />

· Determine roads and land<br />

reserves owned by district<br />

through inspection of RAL<br />

asset register<br />

· Conduct deeds search at<br />

Deeds office for registered<br />

title deeds and servitudes<br />

owned by municipality<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong>


51<br />

Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />

Person<br />

Target Date<br />

Progress<br />

the surplus for the year is<br />

overstated by R463 609 580<br />

12 The municipality did not<br />

calculate or consider impairment<br />

losses on its infrastructure<br />

assets.<br />

· Draft impairment guideline to<br />

determine impairment<br />

indicators<br />

· Assess all assets for<br />

impairment<br />

· Disclose it properly on the<br />

Annual Financial Statement<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

13 Depreciation stated at<br />

R62 269 407, as disclosed in<br />

note 28 to the financial<br />

statements, does not agree to<br />

the balance of R68 792 882 per<br />

the fixed asset register. The<br />

municipality did not reconcile the<br />

difference of R6 5<strong>23</strong> 475<br />

between the financial<br />

statements and the underlying<br />

records.<br />

<strong>14</strong> The municipality could not<br />

provide sufficient appropriate<br />

audit evidence to substantiate<br />

trade payables amounting to<br />

· Recalculation of depreciation<br />

on movable and immovable<br />

assets<br />

· Restate the error in terms of<br />

GRAP 3<br />

· Confirm the configuration of<br />

creditors sub ledger on the<br />

system<br />

· Reconcile the sub-ledger and<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong>


52<br />

Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />

Person<br />

Target Date<br />

Progress<br />

R81 876 358 and as disclosed<br />

in note 17 to the financial<br />

statement. There was no system<br />

of control to reconcile the<br />

supplier statements with the<br />

payments made.<br />

the general ledger<br />

· Request statements of all<br />

creditors balance reported at<br />

year end<br />

· Reconcile suppliers statement<br />

with creditors sub ledger<br />

15 No system was in place for the<br />

identification and recognition of<br />

irregular expenditure and there<br />

were no satisfactory alternative<br />

audit procedures that I could<br />

perform to obtain reasonable<br />

assurance that all irregular<br />

expenditure was properly<br />

recorded. Payments amounting<br />

to R82 743 432 were made in<br />

contravention of the supply<br />

chain management regulations.<br />

The amount was not included in<br />

irregular expenditure, disclosed<br />

in note 40 to the financial<br />

statements. Furthermore, the<br />

municipality could not provide<br />

sufficient appropriate audit<br />

evidence to prove that the<br />

· Audit on all SCM documents<br />

for 2010/11 and 2011/12 by<br />

internal audit<br />

· Confirm with CIPRO that<br />

potential service providers are<br />

not employees in service of<br />

the state<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong>


53<br />

Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />

Person<br />

Target Date<br />

Progress<br />

allocation of contracts<br />

amounting to R26 220 687 were<br />

awarded in accordance with<br />

supply chain management<br />

regulations<br />

16 The municipality entered into an<br />

agency agreement with its local<br />

municipalities for the provision<br />

of water services. As the<br />

principal, the municipality has<br />

not accounted for VAT on the<br />

water transactions in<br />

contravention with the VAT act.<br />

The municipality did not account<br />

for input tax on the agency fees<br />

for the services rendered in<br />

contravention with VAT act.<br />

17 No supporting documentation<br />

could be provided for VAT<br />

accruals of R15 126 700.<br />

· Budget information as required<br />

by SA Standards of GRAP 1 has<br />

been disclosed in Appendix E1<br />

to the financial statements, no<br />

· Engage SARS on the issue of<br />

VAT on water and sanitation<br />

transactions(Principal/Agency<br />

)<br />

· Disclose the VAT on water<br />

and sanitation in the books of<br />

the district<br />

· <strong>Review</strong> the VAT<br />

reconciliations and ensure<br />

supporting documents are<br />

attached to the reconciliation<br />

· Disclose budget information<br />

as required by GRAP<br />

· Explanation of material<br />

variances<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

15 June <strong>2013</strong>


54<br />

Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />

Person<br />

Target Date<br />

Progress<br />

reference has been made of this<br />

in a note to the financial<br />

statements as required by SA<br />

Standards of GRAP.<br />

Councillors remuneration has<br />

not been disclosed in terms of<br />

section 124(1)(a) and (b) of the<br />

MFMA.<br />

Financial risk management as<br />

required by IAS 32, Financial<br />

instruments: Disclosure and<br />

presentation was not disclosed<br />

in the annual financial<br />

statements.<br />

· Explanation of budget<br />

adjustments vs approved<br />

budget<br />

· Disclose Councilor’s<br />

remuneration as required by<br />

MFMA<br />

· Amend salary disclosure for<br />

opening and current year<br />

balances<br />

· Disclose financial risk<br />

management in the annual<br />

financial statements<br />

· Distribution loss will be<br />

calculated based on billable<br />

areas<br />

· Inspect bulk supply and<br />

separate billable and unbilled<br />

areas<br />

· Compare consumption for<br />

billable areas against bulk<br />

supply<br />

· Consumption for Unbillable<br />

Section 125 (2)(d)(i) of the<br />

MFMA requires that the notes to<br />

the annual financial statements<br />

of a municipality must disclose<br />

the particulars of any material<br />

losses. Contrary to these<br />

requirements, the municipality<br />

did not disclose the water<br />

distribution losses as required<br />

by the MFMA.<br />

Chief Financial<br />

Officer<br />

30 June <strong>2013</strong>


55<br />

Par Findings as per Audit Report Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />

Person<br />

Target Date<br />

Progress<br />

areas will be disclosed as free<br />

basic water<br />

· Calculate closing stock(<br />

billable and unbilled areas) for<br />

water<br />

· Update Stock count guideline<br />

for water<br />

· Calculate and disclose<br />

distribution losses<br />

· Collect data on villages per<br />

reservoir<br />

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION<br />

Par<br />

Findings as per<br />

Audit Report<br />

Action Required Challenges Responsible<br />

Person<br />

Target Date<br />

Progress<br />

31 Measures taken<br />

to improve<br />

performance not<br />

disclosed<br />

32 Reported<br />

objectives,<br />

indicators<br />

targets<br />

and<br />

not<br />

Measures to<br />

improve<br />

performance will<br />

be included in the<br />

Monthly reporting<br />

Gap analysis<br />

report to be<br />

undertaken<br />

monthly to check<br />

Amos Matjiya 5 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

Amos Matjiya 30 June <strong>2013</strong>


56<br />

consistent<br />

planned<br />

objectives,<br />

indicators<br />

targets<br />

with<br />

and<br />

alignment<br />

33 Performance<br />

indicators are<br />

not well defined<br />

34 Reported<br />

performance not<br />

valid<br />

35 Reported<br />

performance not<br />

accurate<br />

37 & 38 Strategic<br />

planning and<br />

performance<br />

management<br />

42 Annual financial<br />

statements,<br />

Indicators have<br />

been well defined<br />

in 2012/<strong>2013</strong> and<br />

hence forth to<br />

ensure alignment<br />

with FMPPI<br />

Quarterly<br />

reporting on<br />

evidence<br />

provided against<br />

planned targets<br />

Quarterly<br />

monitoring to<br />

ensure accuracy<br />

Inclusion of the<br />

municipal entity in<br />

the municipal<br />

performance<br />

reporting<br />

processes<br />

The matter to be<br />

addressed in<br />

Amos Matjiya 30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

Amos Matjiya 30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

Amos Matjiya 30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

Amos Matjiya 30 June <strong>2013</strong><br />

Amos Matjiya 30 August <strong>2013</strong>


57<br />

performance<br />

and annual<br />

report<br />

56 Internal control<br />

(performance<br />

information)<br />

2011/12 versus<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> and<br />

hence forth<br />

Standard<br />

operating<br />

procedures for<br />

performance<br />

information to be<br />

developed<br />

Amos Matjiya 15 September<br />

<strong>2013</strong>


1.4. PLANNING PROCESS<br />

The review process has addressed recommendations from different stakeholders and<br />

role players together with comments from the MEC’ assessment of the district. It also<br />

takes into cognizance the assessment of the <strong>District</strong>’s performance against the<br />

organizational objectives, the recommendations during public participation, <strong>IDP</strong><br />

engagement processes and also any new information or any change in circumstances<br />

that might have arisen subsequent to the adoption of 2012/13 <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />

The development process is undertaken through the implementation of the <strong>District</strong><br />

Process Plan which all local municipalities must prepare as per legislation. The process<br />

Plans must comply with the <strong>District</strong> <strong>IDP</strong> Framework to ensure proper implementation,<br />

alignment and coordination between the district and local municipalities as outlined in<br />

Section 27 of the Municipal System Act (MSA). Proper alignment between the <strong>District</strong><br />

and its local municipalities was done when <strong>IDP</strong> Framework at the <strong>District</strong> level and<br />

subsequently process plans for all Local Municipalities were compiled and adopted<br />

between June 2012 and August 2012 respectively. The process and schedule followed<br />

during the development process as stipulated in the <strong>District</strong> <strong>IDP</strong> Framework is depicted<br />

in the figure below.


59<br />

Figure 3 – Key activities and time frames for <strong>IDP</strong> Process<br />

Adoption phase of Process<br />

Plan/Framework<br />

Identification of community<br />

needs<br />

Identification of community<br />

needs<br />

Quarterly review of 2011/12 of<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget and policies<br />

Consolidation/Presentation of<br />

community needs<br />

Mid-year<br />

performance<br />

review/<strong>IDP</strong>/review/tabling of<br />

adjustment budget<br />

Determination of strategic<br />

objectives for service delivery<br />

and development consolidation<br />

of projects<br />

Presentation of the 1 st<br />

Draft<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget<br />

Submission of the Draft<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget to Management,<br />

Executive Mayor, Portfolio<br />

Committees Mayoral Committee<br />

and Council<br />

Community participation and<br />

stakeholders’ consultation on<br />

the Draft <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget. Public<br />

comments and comments from<br />

other organs of state are taken<br />

into cognizance and where<br />

need be, amendments are<br />

effected to the <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />

Tabling of <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget to<br />

Council for final approval<br />

Executive Mayor signs SDBIP<br />

and performance contracts of<br />

Municipal Manager and Senior<br />

Managers<br />

Budget Process<br />

<strong>July</strong> August September October November December January February March April May June


60<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted a new institutional arrangement in 2010, which<br />

is comprised of the Council, Executive Mayor, Members of Mayoral Committee, Portfolio<br />

Committees, Municipal Manager, Directors, <strong>IDP</strong> Managers, <strong>IDP</strong> Cluster meetings,<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget Steering Committee, Communities and Private Sector. The composition of this<br />

structure is outlined below:<br />

Table 1: Composition of the structure, Roles and Responsibilities<br />

Structure<br />

Roles and Responsibilities<br />

Council - Political decision making body.<br />

- Consider, adopt and approve the developed<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>/budget.<br />

- Ensured alignment of the <strong>IDP</strong>/budget report with<br />

the <strong>District</strong> framework.<br />

- Ensured that all relevant stakeholders are<br />

involved.<br />

- Responsible for the overall management,<br />

coordination and monitoring of the <strong>IDP</strong>/budget<br />

process.<br />

Executive Mayor - Provides political guidance over the budget<br />

process and the priorities that must guide the<br />

preparation of a budget.<br />

- Manages the drafting of the municipality’s<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>/budget.<br />

- Tables the <strong>IDP</strong>/ budget to Council.<br />

Members of Mayoral Committee - Recommend the approval of the <strong>IDP</strong>/budget to<br />

Council.<br />

Municipal Manager - Manages and coordinates the <strong>IDP</strong>/budget<br />

process.<br />

- Ensures that all departments fit in the<br />

organizational vision.<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> Managers - Offer strategic guidance and management to the<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>/budget process.<br />

- Ensures that implementation takes place within<br />

the available resources<br />

- Ensures that all relevant stakeholders are<br />

appropriately involved.<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> Cluster Meetings - Coordinate planning across the <strong>District</strong><br />

- Share common understanding on development<br />

issues<br />

- Facilitate horizontal alignment between and<br />

among municipalities<br />

- Provide support to one another when necessary<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget Steering Committee - Manage the <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget process, including the<br />

process plan<br />

- Determine project prioritization model


61<br />

- Determine projects to be funded<br />

- Determine the public participation models<br />

- Monitor the implementation of projects outlined in<br />

the <strong>IDP</strong><br />

- Present the draft <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget to the Rep Forum<br />

- Present the draft <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget to Mayoral<br />

Committee and to Council for approval<br />

Various Communities - Identify and priorities the needs.<br />

- Discuss and comment on the draft <strong>IDP</strong>/budget<br />

document.<br />

Private Sector - Inclusion of their projects in the <strong>IDP</strong>/budget of the<br />

municipality.<br />

- Provide information on the opportunities that the<br />

communities may have in the private sector.<br />

Stakeholder Engagements and Community Participation<br />

Community participation is an integral part and the heart of integrated development planning<br />

process hence the district and all local municipalities also embark on a programme known as<br />

the Community Outreach Programme.<br />

Community participation is a legislated requirement for development and review of a<br />

municipal <strong>IDP</strong>. Section 16 of the Municipal Systems Act, No. 32 of 2000, requires<br />

municipalities to develop a culture of municipal governance that complements formal<br />

representative government with system of participatory government, and must for this<br />

purpose encourage and create conditions for local community to participate in preparation,<br />

implementation and review of its Integrated Development Plan. It also requires municipalities<br />

to encourage and create conditions for the local community to participate in the affairs of the<br />

municipality.<br />

The organizational structures as outlined above will form part of the methods of community<br />

participation in the <strong>IDP</strong> processes. In addition to these, community consultative meetings will<br />

also be held across the area of the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

Public consultations are held according to the possible scenarios presented below, with<br />

possibility of having them in each half of the financial year – during analysis and after the<br />

draft <strong>IDP</strong>. In the normal circumstances, the <strong>IDP</strong> consultative meetings will be held on two<br />

occasions:<br />

ü First round documenting priority needs of communities and the<br />

ü Second round focusing on presenting the Draft <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget to communities.<br />

A schedule outlining the dates, time and venues of community consultative meetings would<br />

be developed and advertised in the in the regional and local newspapers before<br />

commencement of the meetings.


62<br />

Print media, SDM’s newsletters and electronic media are used to inform the community of<br />

the processes of the <strong>IDP</strong>. Dates of the meeting schedules of the <strong>IDP</strong> processes and other<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> related structures including the Community Outreach Programmes are obtainable from<br />

the <strong>District</strong> on request.<br />

1.5. ALIGNMENT WITH NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN<br />

The National Development Plan has strategies outlined according to following areas, which<br />

should be considered by municipalities for alignment.<br />

WATER AND SANITATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES PROPOSED:<br />

· Establish a national water-resources infrastructure agency<br />

The Department of Water Affairs has identified the actions necessary to reconcile the water<br />

demands of major urban and industrial centres with potential supplies up to 5 2030. These<br />

plans need to be translated into well timed investment programmes to avoid supply<br />

constraints. Large investments in regional systems could be undertaken by a national waterresources<br />

infrastructure agency, perhaps modelled on the South African National Roads<br />

Agency Limited.<br />

This agency would build on the foundation provided by the Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority,<br />

which is already supporting implementation of several large projects, and help to resolve the<br />

organisational challenges faced by the department's Water Trading Entity. However, the<br />

national government, through the Department of Water Affairs, should continue to lead the<br />

planning process, reviewing these programmes every five years to ensure coordination with<br />

other long-term economic and infrastructure plans.<br />

· Reduce demand<br />

Reducing growth in water demand is just as important as increasing its supply. Current<br />

planning assumes it will be possible to achieve an average reduction in water demand of 15<br />

percent below baseline levels in urban areas by 2030. Detailed targets have been set for<br />

different areas. Achieving demand reductions on this scale will require programmes to<br />

reduce water leakage in distribution networks and improve efficient domestic and<br />

commercial water use.<br />

The Commission proposes running a national programme to support local and sectoral<br />

initiatives to reduce water demand and improve water-use efficiency. Demand-management<br />

projects with merit should be given priority and regarded as being on par with water-supply<br />

expansion projects in terms of importance.<br />

· Manage agricultural use better<br />

Agriculture uses the largest volume of water (even though agricultural water supplies are<br />

less reliable than those supplied to urban and industrial users). The farming sector will have<br />

to increase its water efficiency to improve production and allow for water to be transferred to


63<br />

new users in water scarce areas, to compensate for the expansion of irrigated agriculture,<br />

which has high job-creation potential. The Commission proposes a dedicated national<br />

programme to provide support to local and sectoral efforts to reduce water demand and<br />

improve water-use efficiency. Water-saving and demand-management projects should be<br />

considered as part of the overall range of water supply investment programmes. These can<br />

be compared with supply expansion projects, and should be prioritised accordingly, based<br />

on their merits<br />

· Investigate water reuse and desalination<br />

There is already extensive indirect reuse of water in inland areas, where municipal and<br />

industrial waste water is reintroduced into rivers after treatment. However, there is<br />

considerable scope for further water reuse. Many municipalities lack the technical capacity to<br />

build and manage their wastewater treatment systems. As a result, a regional approach to<br />

wastewater management may be required in certain areas. Water infrastructure investment<br />

should include projects to treat and reuse water, selected on their merits. Research into<br />

water reuse and desalination and the skills to operate such technology should be developed,<br />

perhaps under the auspices of a national water-resource infrastructure agency (discussed<br />

below) or the Water Research Commission.<br />

AGRICULTURE AND AGRO-PROCESSING STRATEGY PROPOSALS:<br />

• Substantial investment in irrigation infrastructure, including water storage, distribution<br />

and reticulation throughout the country where the natural resource base allows, as<br />

well as in water-saving technology. A 50 percent increase in land under irrigation<br />

would cost R40 billion in off-farm infrastructure over a 10-year period.<br />

• Greater investment in providing innovative market linkages for small-scale farmers in<br />

communal and land-reform areas.<br />

• As part of comprehensive support packages for farmers, preferential procurement<br />

mechanisms to ensure that new agricultural entrants can also access these markets.<br />

• Tenure security. Farmers will only invest in these areas if they believe that their<br />

income streams from agriculture are secure. Tenure security will secure incomes for<br />

existing farmers at all scales, for new entrants into agriculture, and for the investment<br />

required to grow incomes.<br />

• Technology development. Growth in agricultural production has always been fuelled<br />

by technology, and the returns to investment in agricultural research and<br />

development are high.<br />

• Policy measures to increase intake of fruits and vegetables, and reduce intake of<br />

saturated fats, sugar and salt, as recommended in the South African food dietary<br />

guidelines, to accompany strategies to increase vegetable and fruit production.


64<br />

• Exploration of innovative measures, such as procurement from small-scale farmers<br />

to create local buffer stocks and community-owned emergency services.<br />

MINERALS CLUSTER STRATEGY PROPOSALS:<br />

· Address the major constraints impeding accelerated growth and development of the<br />

mining sector in South Africa. The main interventions include: ensuring certainty in<br />

respect of property rights; passing amendments to the Minerals and Petroleum<br />

Resource Development Act (2002) to ensure a predictable, competitive and stable<br />

mining regulatory framework; secure reliable electricity supply and/or enable firms to<br />

supply their own plant with an estimated potential of 2 500MW by 2015; and secure,<br />

reliable rail services, potentially enabling private participation.<br />

· Develop, deepen and enhance linkages with other sections of the economy. This<br />

includes: linkages with both manufacturers of inputs (capital goods and<br />

consumables) and suppliers of mining-related services; and downstream producers,<br />

especially for platinum-group metals and chrome ore. In this regard, an export tax<br />

could be considered.<br />

· Provide focused research and development support to enable improved extraction<br />

methods that lengthen mine life; better energy efficiency and less water intensity; and<br />

alternative uses of South Africa's extracted minerals, especially platinum-group<br />

metals, titanium and others that have potential for application in new energy systems<br />

and machinery.<br />

· Identify opportunities to increase regional involvement and benefit in the whole<br />

minerals cluster. This could include encouraging the establishment and development<br />

of alternative providers of partially processed intermediate inputs in other countries in<br />

the region.<br />

· Ensure active engagement on, and resolution to, issues raised through the Mining<br />

Industry Growth and Development Task Team process.<br />

· Improve alignment of mining charter requirements to ensure effectiveness in local<br />

communities.<br />

Construction/Infrastructure<br />

Address government's ability to spend its infrastructure budget, particularly with<br />

regard to project-management capacity, long-term planning, and monitoring and<br />

evaluation of both expenditure patterns and construction work.<br />

Support the civil construction and the supplier industries in their export efforts – with<br />

the establishment of a Financial Centre for Africa, and more support in commercial<br />

diplomatic relations.<br />

Intensify support to supplier industries such as building supplies, steel, glass and<br />

cement.<br />

Create conditions for a less cyclically volatile industry by emphasising numerous,<br />

smaller scale, regionally dispersed projects to address backlogs, which are more<br />

accessible to smaller firms and new entrants.


65<br />

Expand public funding for alternative types of low-income housing that would<br />

generate more demand directly and in supplier industries.<br />

Promote a simultaneous focus on more energy-efficient buildings and building<br />

techniques to reduce demands on electricity supply in the longer term. Home<br />

insulation and the installation of solar water heaters are labour-intensive activities<br />

that have strong backward linkages to supplier industries.<br />

Tourism and Culture<br />

· Emphasis will be placed on increasing the total number of tourists entering the<br />

country, and the average amount of money spent by each tourist.<br />

· Ease of doing business, as well as availability of appropriate levels of tourism<br />

infrastructure (particularly transport, tourism offerings/ products and accommodation),<br />

will play an important role in attracting different types of tourists.<br />

· Foreign business tourists arriving by air generate the most significant multipliers.<br />

South Africa will be positioned as the business and shopping centre for the region.<br />

· South Africa can do more to develop the region as an international tourist destination<br />

by emphasising the broader biodiversity, cultural diversity, scenic beauty and range<br />

of tourism products, and making it easier for tourists to travel between countries in<br />

the region. A Schengen-type visa for the region will be considered.<br />

Overarching Principles for Spatial Development<br />

“All spatial development should conform to the following normative principles and should<br />

explicitly indicate how they would meet the requirements of these principles (National<br />

Planning Commission; The Presidency, RSA, 2012: 277):<br />

- Spatial justice. The historic policy of confining particular groups to limited space, as<br />

in ghettoization and segregation, and the unfair allocation of public resources<br />

between areas, must be reversed to ensure that the needs of the poor are addressed<br />

first rather than last.<br />

- Spatial sustainability. Sustainable patterns of consumption and production should<br />

be supported, and ways of living promoted that do not damage the natural<br />

environment.<br />

- Spatial resilience. Vulnerability to environmental degradation, resource scarcity and<br />

climatic shocks must be reduced. Ecological systems should be protected and<br />

replenished.<br />

- Spatial quality. The aesthetic and functional features of housing and the built<br />

environment need to be improved to create liveable, vibrant and valued places that<br />

allow for access and inclusion of people with disabilities.


66<br />

- Spatial efficiency. Productive activity and jobs should be supported, and burdens on<br />

business minimised. Efficient commuting patterns and circulation of goods and<br />

services should be encouraged, with regulatory procedures that do not impose<br />

unnecessary costs on development.<br />

1.6. ALIGNMENT WITH NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN<br />

Purpose of National Infrastructure Plan<br />

The South African Government adopted a National Infrastructure Plan in 2012 whose<br />

purpose is to transform economic landscape while simultaneously creating significant<br />

numbers of new jobs, and to strengthen the delivery of basic services. The plan also<br />

supports the integration of African economies.<br />

The National Infrastructure Plan contains 18 strategic Infrastructure Plans, out of which<br />

those with relevance to local government are summarised below:<br />

SIP 18: Water and sanitation infrastructure<br />

· A 10-year plan to address the estimated backlog of adequate water to supply 1.4 m<br />

households and 2.1 m households to basic sanitation. The project will involve<br />

provision of sustainable supply of water to meet social needs and support economic<br />

growth.<br />

· Projects will provide for new infrastructure, rehabilitation and upgrading of existing<br />

infrastructure, as well as improve management of water infrastructure.<br />

SIP 11: Agri-logistics and rural infrastructure<br />

Improve investment in agricultural and rural infrastructure that supports expansion of<br />

production and employment, small-scale farming and rural development, including:<br />

· facilities for storage (silos, fresh-produce facilities, packing houses)<br />

· transport links to main networks (rural roads, branch train-line, ports)<br />

· fencing of farms<br />

· irrigation schemes to poor areas<br />

· improved R&D on rural issues (including expansion of agricultural colleges)<br />

· processing facilities (abattoirs, dairy infrastructure)<br />

· aquaculture incubation schemes<br />

· rural tourism infrastructure.


67<br />

SIP 6: Integrated municipal infrastructure project<br />

· Develop national capacity to assist the <strong>23</strong> least resourced districts (19 million people)<br />

to address all the maintenance backlogs and upgrades required in water, electricity<br />

and sanitation bulk infrastructure.<br />

· The road maintenance programme will enhance service delivery capacity thereby<br />

impacting positively on the population.<br />

SIP 10: Electricity transmission and distribution for all<br />

· Expand the transmission and distribution network to address historical imbalances,<br />

provide access to electricity for all and support economic development.<br />

· Align the 10-year transmission plan, the services backlog, the national broadband<br />

roll-out and the freight rail line development to leverage off regulatory approvals,<br />

supply chain and project development capacity.<br />

SIP 1: Unlocking the northern mineral belt with Waterberg as the catalyst<br />

· Unlock mineral resources.<br />

· Rail, water pipelines, energy generation and transmission infrastructure.<br />

· Thousands of direct jobs across the areas unlocked.<br />

· Urban development in Waterberg - first major post-apartheid new urban centre will be<br />

a “green” development project.<br />

· Rail capacity to Mpumalanga and Richards Bay.<br />

· Shift from road to rail in Mpumalanga.<br />

· Logistics corridor to connect Mpumalanga and Gauteng.<br />

Primary Mineral Reserves<br />

Coal<br />

Chromite<br />

Platinum<br />

Palladium<br />

18 bn tons<br />

5,5 tons<br />

6 3<strong>23</strong> tons<br />

3 611 tons


68<br />

1.7. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF THE DISTRICT<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is an area with a long and proud history. It is also a place of majestic beauty<br />

with legal mountains, lush valleys and meandering rivers. Under its soil, lie vast deposits of<br />

precious metals – so vast that they today contain the largest reserves of platinum group<br />

metals in the world. Above its soil, sprout more than 2200 indigenous species of vascular<br />

plants, making it an area of exceptionally high biodiversity that is globally recognized. It is a<br />

land blessed by natural beauty, unusual resource endowments and a compelling history<br />

dating back to the 16 th century.<br />

The people of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> still remember the heritage bequeathed to them by their<br />

forefathers – by the legendary Chief <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 1 st who is still commemorated by South<br />

African leaders today, by the compassionate Pretoria Bishop, Michael Furse, who<br />

championed the cause of mineworkers in the early 1900s, by the hundreds of migrant<br />

workers who belonged to the celebrated Fetakgomo movement in the 1950s and by more<br />

recent heroes like Elias Motsoaledi. It is a legacy of resilience against all odds, and a<br />

commitment to uplifting the lives of the ordinary people of the region.<br />

Modern-day <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is found in Limpopo province, the Northern-most part of South<br />

Africa. The district which lies in the South-Eastern part of the province covers an area of<br />

approximately 13 264 square kilometers, most of which is rural with almost 740 villages<br />

(according to ward committees), which are generally sparsely populated and dispersed<br />

throughout the <strong>District</strong>. It is estimated that only 5% of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> population live in<br />

urban areas.<br />

Figure 4 - Geographic Location Map


69<br />

Figure 5: Land size per Local <strong>Municipality</strong> in %


70<br />

The main urban centres are Groblersdal, Marble Hall, Burgersfort, Jane Furse, Ohrigstad,<br />

Steelpoort and Driekop. The area’s towns and villages are serviced by its major rivers – the<br />

Olifants.<br />

HISTORY BEHIND THE NAMES<br />

Elias Motsoaledi: A legendary hero who was born in Nebo and was later sentenced to life imprisonment<br />

as part of the Rivonia treason trial. He spent 26 years in Robben Island until his release in 1989.<br />

Fetakgomo: The Sebatakgomo organization was first founded by migrant workers in the 1950s. It later<br />

resurfaced as Fetakgomo, a Pedi idiom which appeals for unity.<br />

Makhuduthamaga: Literally meaning “the executive”, this was a term used to denote members of the<br />

Fetakgomo movement in the 1950s.<br />

Ephraim Mogale: A Cadre who was born in Bingley, near Settlers on the 6 th February 1955. He was later<br />

sentenced to eight (8) years in Roben Island, of which he served five (5). He was released in 1985.<br />

Tubatse: Named after the famous Tubatse (Steelpoort) River. The capital of the early Pedi Empire,<br />

Manganeng, was found on the banks of this river in the early 1800s.<br />

The area is governed by the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM), a Category C<br />

municipality established in December 2000. Until early 2006, the <strong>District</strong> was a cross-border<br />

municipality, straddling the Limpopo and Mpumalanga provinces. In 2005, following a<br />

Constitutional amendment prohibiting cross-border municipalities, the <strong>District</strong> was wholly<br />

incorporated into Limpopo Province.


71<br />

The <strong>District</strong> is made up of 5 local municipalities (LMs) – Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

(formerly the Groblersdal Local <strong>Municipality</strong>), Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong>, Ephraim<br />

Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong>, Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> and Makhuduthamaga Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>. Ephraim Mogale <strong>Municipality</strong> is predictably found within the Marble Hall area,<br />

whilst the others are centred on major conurbations like Groblersdal (Elias Motsoaledi), Apel<br />

(Fetakgomo), Burgersfort (Tubatse) and Jane Furse (Makhuduthamaga).<br />

Figure 6- Map of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> Municipal area<br />

The district consists of 121 wards which are broken down per local municipality as follows:<br />

Table 2: Number of wards per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong> Number of Wards Number of Villages<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 30 151<br />

Fetakgomo 13 98<br />

Ephraim Mogale 16 69<br />

Greater Tubatse 31 <strong>23</strong>3<br />

Makhuduthamaga 31 189<br />

TOTAL 121 740


Figure 7 – SDM Wards<br />

72


73<br />

CHAPTER 2:<br />

GOVERNANCE<br />

AND<br />

INSTITUTIONAL<br />

FRAMEWORK


74<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In December 2009, the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> approved its new governance and<br />

institutional model. The governance model comprises of the Legislature and the Executive.<br />

The Legislature is made up of the Speaker of Council, the Council’s Chief Whip and Section<br />

79 Portfolio Committees, Standing Committees, Section 80 Committees and the Executive.<br />

The Executive consists of the Executive Mayor and Section 79 Portfolio, Section 80<br />

Committees and the Executive Mayor and Members of the Mayoral Committee (MMCs), as<br />

well as the administration, led by the Municipal Manager.<br />

The <strong>District</strong>’s governance model is underpinned by the following key principles:<br />

• Delineation of powers to separate legislative and oversight roles and executive roles<br />

and responsibilities;<br />

• Governance and institutional arrangements should deepen democracy, facilitate<br />

citizen empowerment and enhance stakeholder participation and involvement;<br />

• Decision-making powers and accountability should be strengthened, clearly defined,<br />

allocated and decentralized, where appropriate<br />

• Expeditious and efficient decision-making should ensure the facilitation of effective<br />

governance; and<br />

• Institutional structures of the <strong>District</strong> to be considered as part of a single group,<br />

based on a politically-led strategic and policy perspectives.<br />

The separation of legislative and executive roles delegates executive functions to the<br />

Executive Mayor and defines the roles of the legislature as that of oversight of the Executive.<br />

This function is performed by Council (in plenary), the Municipal Public Accounts Committee<br />

and the Section 79 Portfolio Committees, under the chairpersonship of non-executive<br />

councilors. These committees monitor and scrutinise the delivery and outputs of the<br />

Executive and may request the MMCs or Heads of Department (HoDs) to account for<br />

service delivery and performance.<br />

The Council, when meeting in plenary, provides an important platform for meaningful debate<br />

on issues that affect and require the attention of the <strong>District</strong>. It has three essential but<br />

interrelated roles and issues of legislation, oversight and to ensure community and<br />

stakeholder participation.<br />

2.1. LEGISLATURE<br />

The Council’s legislative functions include the approval of the by-laws, policies, the<br />

Integrated Development Plan (<strong>IDP</strong>), tariff for rates and service charges and the budget. The<br />

Council’s role in this respect is to consider reports from the Executive Mayor on each of<br />

these functions, to consider public discussions and comment, stimulates debate in multiparty<br />

portfolio committees and to provide the public platform for <strong>District</strong>-wide interaction. On the<br />

basis of the comments, the Council is in the position to approve or amend reports or to refer<br />

the reports back to the Executive Mayor.


75<br />

Council seeks to ensure community and stakeholder participation. The Council, led by the<br />

Office of the Speaker, has to facilitate community and stakeholder consultation and<br />

participation. Individual ward councillors, in conjunction with elected ward committees, play a<br />

critical role in facilitating these participatory processes.<br />

2.2. CHIEF WHIP<br />

The Council’s Chief Whip plays a pivotal role in the overall system of governance to ensure<br />

and sustain cohesiveness within the governing party and maintain relationships with other<br />

political parties. The main functions of the Chief Whip are to:<br />

• Ensure proper representation of political parties in the various committees;<br />

• Maintain sound relations with the various political parties represented in the Council; and<br />

• Attend to disputes between political parties and build consensus.<br />

2.3. SECTION 80 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEES<br />

These committees perform an oversight role by monitoring the delivery and outputs of the<br />

Executive. They are entitled to request departments and MMCs to account for their<br />

functions. In line with this responsibility, these committees may summon departments to<br />

appear before the committee and present any required documentation and information. The<br />

Portfolio Committees do not have any delegated decision-making powers.<br />

The specific functions of Portfolio Committees include:<br />

· <strong>Review</strong>ing, monitoring and evaluating departmental policies;<br />

· <strong>Review</strong>ing plans and budgets;<br />

· Considering quarterly and annual departmental reports;<br />

· Examining the link between the policy (sector plans) and budget (business plans);<br />

· Monitoring the implementation of plans;<br />

· Exploring options to increase value for money, and<br />

· Holding the political executive accountable for performance against policies and<br />

<strong>District</strong> priorities.<br />

Following are the five Portfolio Committees:<br />

• Budget and Treasury (BTC): Councillor Sihlangu T.L (Chairperson)<br />

• Community Services: Councillor Thamaga M.M (Chairperson)<br />

• Corporate Services: Councillor Mafefe O.H (Chairperson)<br />

• Infrastructure and Water Services: Councillor Ratau M.F (Chairperson)<br />

• Planning and Economic Development: Councillor Maitula B.M (Chairperson)


76<br />

2.4. SECTION 79 STANDING COMMITTEES<br />

The Standing Committees are permanent committees, established to deal with Councilrelated<br />

matters. They have some delegated decision-making powers and are required to<br />

submit reports to Council. Councillors chair all Standing Committees, except the Audit<br />

Committee, which is chaired by an independent person in line with the prescriptions of the<br />

Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA).<br />

The following standing committees have been put in place:<br />

• Municipal Public Accounts Committee: Cllr Lekola M.F (Chairperson)<br />

• Petitions, Rules and Ethics Committee: Cllr Mathebe N.C (Chairperson)<br />

• Chairpersons Committee:<br />

• Programming Committee: Cllr Mathebe N.C (Chairperson)<br />

• Audit Committee<br />

2.5. THE EXECUTIVE<br />

The Executive Mayor, assisted by the Mayoral Committee, heads the executive arm of the<br />

<strong>District</strong>. The Executive Mayor is at the centre of the system of governance and the executive<br />

powers are vested in him by the Council to manage the daily affairs of the <strong>District</strong>. This<br />

means that he has the overarching strategic and political responsibility. The following are the<br />

portfolios allocated to Members of Mayoral Committee:<br />

• MMC: Planning and Economic Development: Matlala RM<br />

• MMC: Corporate Service: Nchabeleng TL<br />

• MMC: Infrastructure and Water Services: Mahlo SA<br />

• MMC: Budget and Treasury: Seloane LM<br />

• MMC: Community Services: Mokoka K.S.D.<br />

• MMC: in Office of the Executive Mayor – Traditional Affairs: Kgoloko N.L<br />

• MMC: in Office of the Executive Mayor - Gender Leadership: Mamahlako P.M<br />

• MMC: Infrastructure and Water Services: Lokola M.F<br />

2.6. THE LEADER OF EXECUTIVE BUSINESS<br />

The Leader of Executive Business provides the interface between the executive and<br />

legislative branches. The roles and responsibilities of the Leader of Executive Business are<br />

to:<br />

· Represent the executive branch in terms of Council matters and serve as the link<br />

between the executive branch and the legislative branch;<br />

· Ensure that executive business is effectively delegated to Council, via the<br />

Programming Committee;


77<br />

· Consult with the Speaker when the Speaker intends calling a special meeting of<br />

Council, outside of the scheduled Council meetings;<br />

· Consult with the Speaker for purposes of allocating time for the discussion of matters<br />

of public importance on the Council agenda, and<br />

· Determine which matters are referred to the Speaker and thereafter to Section 79<br />

Committees and Council.<br />

2.7. ADMINISTRATION<br />

The Municipal Manager is also the accounting officer, as defined by the Municipal Structures<br />

Act. The responsibilities of the Municipal Manager include managing the financial affairs and<br />

service delivery in the municipality. He is assisted by the Management Team composed of<br />

the following departments:<br />

• Municipal Manager’s Office composed of the Chief Operations Officer with the<br />

Internal Audit Unit, Risk Management Unit, Strategic Planning and Policy Coordination<br />

Unit<br />

• Corporate Services<br />

• Budget and Treasury<br />

• Planning and Economic Development<br />

• Infrastructure and Water Services<br />

• Community Services<br />

2.8. MUNICIPAL OWNED ENTITY<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has established the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Development Agency<br />

(SDA) as its own Municipal Owned Entity to drive high impact economic development<br />

programmes. The entity is headed by the Chief Executive Officer with a Board of Directors in<br />

place to provide management oversight.<br />

2.9. HUMAN RESOURCES<br />

The <strong>District</strong> is committed to an efficient human resources system and has reviewed a<br />

number of policies to ensure the effective development of staff.


78<br />

CHAPTER 3:<br />

ANALYSIS PHASE


79<br />

3.1 DEMOGRAPHICS IN SDM<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT VILLAGES<br />

Figure 8: Number of villages in the district<br />

32%<br />

13%<br />

9%<br />

Fetakgomo<br />

Ephraim M<br />

20%<br />

Elias M<br />

26%<br />

Makhuduthamaga<br />

Greater Tubatse<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

There are 740 villages in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. 32% (<strong>23</strong>3) of the villages are<br />

found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 26% (189) in Makhuduthamaga Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>; 20% (151) in Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 13% (98) in Fetakgomo Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> and finally 9 %( 69) are found in Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. Greater<br />

Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest number of villages and Ephraim Mogale being<br />

the lowest.<br />

There are 121 wards in the district as follows: Makhuduthamaga (31); Greater Tubatse (31);<br />

Elias Motsoaledi (30); Ephraim Mogale (16) and Fetakgomo (13).<br />

The only issue which remains a concern regarding villages is names of these villages. There<br />

is a need to rationalise the naming and renaming of villages as they change every day. The<br />

<strong>District</strong> Geographic Names Council must prioritise this matter.<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT HOUSEHOLDS<br />

Table 3: Households in the district<br />

MUNICIPALITIE<br />

S<br />

Population Number of households Average<br />

household size<br />

1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011


80<br />

Ephraim Mogale 97 597 115 682 1<strong>23</strong> 648 19 666 24 189 32 284 5,0 4,8 3,8<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 218 622 213 218 249 363 42 641 45 478 60 251 5,1 4,7 4,1<br />

Makhuduthamaga 266 845 258 246 274 358 49 798 52 978 65 217 5,4 4,9 4,2<br />

Fetakgomo 96 945 91 589 93 795 17 376 18 883 22 851 5,6 4,9 4,1<br />

Greater Tubatse 227 127 264 258 335 676 42 427 53 756 83 199 5,4 4,9 4,0<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 907 137 942 993 1 076 840 171 908 195 285 263 802 5,3 4,8 4,1<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

Since 1996, the number of households in the district has been on an upward trend. In 2011,<br />

there are 263 802 households in the district. The average household size is 4.1 in 2011 and<br />

was 5,3 in 1996. This means that the extended family set up is beginning to change on a<br />

daily basis with modern life styles. The provincial household average size is 3.8 which mean<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> household average size is still relatively high by comparison.<br />

Household size<br />

The households’ size in the rural areas differs with the households’ sizes in the urban areas.<br />

The households’ size in the rural areas is 4.76% while in the urban areas is 4.22%.<br />

HOUSING TYPE MAIN DWELLING<br />

In 2011, <strong>23</strong>4 095 households are living in formal dwellings. There is also 10 107 households<br />

who still reside in traditional dwellings such as mud houses. Informal dwellings are also<br />

found in the district which stand at 17 861 in 2011. There is a need to formalise the informal<br />

dwellings (shacks) especially those found around main towns in the district.<br />

Table 4: Main Dwellings<br />

MUNICIPALITIES Formal dwellings Traditional dwellings Informal dwellings<br />

1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />

Ephraim Mogale 13 355 19 097 30 102 4 899 3 827 773 1 108 1 196 1 <strong>23</strong>2<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 30 803 36 137 54 503 8 705 6 902 2 274 1 995 2 356 3 <strong>14</strong>1<br />

Makhuduthamaga 33 407 41 712 58 744 13 354 8 804 2 819 2 337 2 403 3 398<br />

Fetakgomo 10 987 15 258 21 535 5 566 2 713 451 521 762 685<br />

Greater Tubatse 25 079 38 890 69 212 13 600 9 874 3 790 3 115 4 802 9 406<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 113<br />

632<br />

151<br />

094<br />

<strong>23</strong>4<br />

095<br />

46 124 32 121 10 107 9 075 11 520 17 861<br />

Source Census (2011)


81<br />

HOUSEHOLD TENURE STATUS<br />

The rental housing market is growing rapidly in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. 28 825<br />

households were recorded to be living in rented houses in the district. Not surprisingly, the<br />

majority of these households are found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> especially with<br />

migrants into the mining industry. Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi also recorded<br />

markedly improved numbers for rental stock.<br />

Table 5: Household tenure status<br />

MUNICIPALITIES Owned and fully paid<br />

off<br />

Owned but not yet fully<br />

paid off<br />

Rented<br />

2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011<br />

Ephraim Mogale <strong>14</strong> <strong>23</strong>1 995 1 120 13 553 604 4 288<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 24 627 1 440 3 153 33 324 1 658 5 828<br />

Makhuduthamaga 30 979 2 191 1 441 44 302 2 257 3 035<br />

Fetakgomo 11 757 1 026 1 066 12 073 913 1 979<br />

Greater Tubatse 30 281 3 663 2 <strong>14</strong>0 41 108 3 768 13 697<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 111 877 9 315 8 921 <strong>14</strong>4 360 9 201 28 827<br />

Source Census (2011)<br />

HOUSEHOLD OWNERSHIP, RADIO, TELEVISION, COMPUTER, REFRIGERATOR, LANDLINE,<br />

CELL PHONE, INTERNET<br />

Table 6: Household ownership, Radio, Television, Computer, Refrigerator, Landline, Cell<br />

phone, Internet<br />

MUNICIPALI<br />

TY<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Makhuduth<br />

amaga<br />

RADIO TELEVISION COMPUTE<br />

R<br />

2001 2011 200<br />

1<br />

1602<br />

1<br />

3304<br />

3<br />

3469<br />

5<br />

Fetakgomo 1242<br />

8<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

3602<br />

7<br />

1718<br />

7<br />

3884<br />

9<br />

3952<br />

3<br />

<strong>14</strong>47<br />

1<br />

4760<br />

3<br />

1<strong>14</strong><br />

87<br />

241<br />

71<br />

184<br />

72<br />

442<br />

9<br />

154<br />

25<br />

2011 20<br />

01<br />

2188<br />

8<br />

4410<br />

8<br />

4676<br />

5<br />

1737<br />

2<br />

4947<br />

4<br />

46<br />

3<br />

66<br />

0<br />

30<br />

8<br />

13<br />

8<br />

58<br />

1<br />

201<br />

1<br />

254<br />

5<br />

609<br />

3<br />

437<br />

1<br />

161<br />

9<br />

784<br />

5<br />

REFRIGIRAT<br />

OR<br />

200<br />

1<br />

109<br />

43<br />

246<br />

77<br />

160<br />

82<br />

463<br />

1<br />

179<br />

54<br />

2011 200<br />

1<br />

2104<br />

5<br />

4326<br />

3<br />

4484<br />

9<br />

1644<br />

1<br />

5090<br />

2<br />

LANDLINE CELLPHONE INTER<br />

NET<br />

215<br />

3<br />

417<br />

8<br />

204<br />

3<br />

20<br />

11<br />

78<br />

5<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

98<br />

10<br />

34<br />

453 39<br />

3<br />

268<br />

5<br />

16<br />

67<br />

200<br />

1<br />

522<br />

2<br />

119<br />

44<br />

918<br />

0<br />

262<br />

7<br />

964<br />

1<br />

2011 2011<br />

2674<br />

2<br />

5303<br />

5<br />

5469<br />

2<br />

1897<br />

3<br />

7399<br />

7<br />

5079<br />

13308<br />

12024<br />

3676<br />

16567<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 1322 1576 739 1786 21 224 742 1764 115 53 386 2274 50653


82<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>14</strong> 31 75 07 50 73 88 99 11 77 13 39<br />

Source: Census 2011<br />

The number of households who have radio ownership have increased from 132 2<strong>14</strong> in 2001<br />

to 157 631 in 2011. Television ownership have improved from 73 975 in 2001 to 178 607 in<br />

2011 which is more than double. Refrigerator ownership have also improved from 74 288 in<br />

2001 to 176 499 in 2011. Cell phone ownership have also shot up from 38 613 in 2001 t<br />

227 439 in 2011. The trends tell a story that access to communication in the district has<br />

improved. The rise in average household incomes has also implied that there was<br />

disposable income to buy other products such as television, fridges and cell phones.<br />

The implication is that there is a chance for the district to start offering better services to the<br />

residents and opportunities for cost recovery are abound. Unemployment has shifted from<br />

61.6% in 1996 to 50.9% in 2011 and therefore there is real change in economic dynamics.<br />

POPULATION<br />

The population of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has been growing at an average of 1, 1%<br />

per annum from 1996 to 2011. According to Statistics South Africa (SSA) 2011 census, the<br />

population of the district is now standing at 1, 076 840 persons. This compares to population<br />

growth numbers in 2001 at 967 185 as well as 1996 which stood at 9<strong>14</strong> 492. On the whole,<br />

the population growth numbers in the district have been growing moderately and this can be<br />

ascribed to a number of factors as will be indicated when comparing data from the local<br />

municipalities in the district.<br />

Figure 9 – Population growth rate<br />

Population growth rates in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

1996-2011<br />

Population growth rates in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 1996-2011<br />

1076840<br />

9<strong>14</strong>492<br />

967185<br />

Year 1996 Year 2001 Year 2011<br />

Source: CENSUS (2011)


83<br />

If one compares the growth rate in the district with a neighbouring <strong>District</strong> (Waterberg) there<br />

are stark realities. Waterberg have similar features in terms of drivers for economic<br />

development around mining developments. In 2001, Waterberg growth rate was at 2, 6%<br />

(604 938 persons) and 1, 2% in 2011 (679 336 persons). It will be interesting for<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> to start comparing itself and working together with Waterberg simply<br />

because they are both in Limpopo and are exposed to almost similar economic conditions.<br />

Population growth numbers in local municipalities<br />

As indicated in the figure below, <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> comprises five local<br />

municipalities namely; Greater Tubatse, Makhuduthamaga, Ephraim Mogale, Elias<br />

Motsoaledi and Fetakgomo. Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has experienced<br />

tremendous population growth from 1996 to 2011 and the growth curve has always been<br />

upward at 3.2% in 2001 and 2.2% in 2011 whereas the average growth rate in the district<br />

has been 1.1%. Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> have always stayed behind with very slow<br />

growth rate at -1, 0% in 2001 and 0.1% in 2011.<br />

The factors that have been driving growth in population numbers in the district can be<br />

summarised as follows:<br />

• In-migration into Tubatse local municipality for job opportunities especially in the<br />

mining sector and associated industries<br />

• There are also migrants from other provinces who have come into the district to look<br />

for work.<br />

The national scenario indicates that Gauteng Province and Western Cape have continued to<br />

attract more people from other provinces and <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is not<br />

immune from such national trends in out-migration.<br />

Figure 10: Population trends per LM<br />

400000<br />

350000<br />

300000<br />

250000<br />

200000<br />

150000<br />

100000<br />

50000<br />

0<br />

Population growth trends per<br />

local municipality year 1996<br />

Population growth trends per<br />

local municipality year 2001<br />

Population growth trends per<br />

local municipality year 2011


84<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

Table 7: The recorded population figures per local municipality are as follows:<br />

MUNICIPALITY 1996 2001 2011 % growth<br />

rate 2001<br />

% growth rate<br />

2011<br />

Greater Tubatse 229 583 269 608 335 676 3,2% 2,2%<br />

Makhuduthamaga 269 313 262 005 274 358 -0,6% 0,5%<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 220 394 221 647 249 363 0,1% 1,2%<br />

Ephraim Mogale 97 988 121 327 1<strong>23</strong> 648 4,3% 0,2%<br />

Fetakgomo 97 213 92 598 93 795 -1,0% 0,1%<br />

Total:<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

9<strong>14</strong> 492 967 185 1,076 840 1,1% 1,1%<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

Implications of population growth trends for the district<br />

The population growth trends suggest that there are more persons coming into Greater<br />

Tubatse and Elias Motsoaledi Local Municipalities. There is also a moderate increase in<br />

population numbers into Makhuduthamaga local municipality. With regard to allocation of<br />

resources and services, the district municipality should ensure that the three municipalities<br />

receive much attention in terms myriad of services such as water and sanitation services but<br />

also for services that are rendered by other spheres of government. These municipalities<br />

where there are high growth numbers need to plan adequately for services provision so that<br />

there is no collapse on the current level of service in the communities. Fetakgomo and<br />

Ephraim Mogale also need to be assisted so that the growth numbers increase in the next<br />

10 years at least to 1% per annum.<br />

Gender Profile<br />

Figure11: Gender Profile: Males and Females<br />

700000<br />

600000<br />

500000<br />

400000<br />

300000<br />

200000<br />

100000<br />

0<br />

YEAR 1996 YEAR 2001 YEAR 2011<br />

MALES<br />

FEMALES<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

Since 1996, sex ratios have not changed much. In 2011, there are 497 428 males compared<br />

to 579 191 females. The imbalance can be attributed to large numbers of males who migrate<br />

to other provinces to look for work opportunities. As a result of the rural nature of the district


85<br />

of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, there are still persons who work in other provinces such as Gauteng and<br />

only come back home monthly or bi-monthly to see their families. This scenario also tells a<br />

picture that there might high presence of female headed households in the district.<br />

The implication for the district is that there is a need to develop programmes that target<br />

women in particular to create self-employment and educational opportunities where possible.<br />

Table 8: Gender profile: Males and Females<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Males Females<br />

1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />

Ephraim Mogale 45 117 55 765 58 207 52 871 65 561 65 442<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 100 000 99 104 115 503 120 394 122 543 133 860<br />

Makhuduthamaga 118 421 113 6<strong>14</strong> 121 282 150 892 <strong>14</strong>8 392 153 075<br />

Fetakgomo 43 187 40 902 42 258 54 026 51 696 51 536<br />

Greater Tubatse 103 955 121 043 160 125 125 628 <strong>14</strong>8 565 175 278<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 410 681 430 428 497 428 503 811 536 757 579 191<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

POPULATION GROUP BY RACE<br />

The figure below indicates that 99% of the population in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is<br />

made up of Africans. The remainder 1% comprises Whites, Indians and Coloureds. It is not a<br />

surprising trend because a large part of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> comprises villages<br />

under tribal authorities. The 1% of the Whites, Indians and Coloureds are confined to the<br />

main towns in the district and mining areas.<br />

Figure 12: Population by race<br />

Population by race<br />

1200000<br />

1000000<br />

800000<br />

600000<br />

400000<br />

200000<br />

0<br />

Africans Coloured Indian/Asian Whites<br />

Population by race<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

Table 9: Population growth by race<br />

RACE 1996 2001 2011<br />

Africans 898 129 958 594 1 061 550<br />

Coloured 579 727 1 <strong>23</strong>2<br />

Indian/Asian 377 508 1 721<br />

Whites 8 876 7 356 11 015


86<br />

Source Census (2011)<br />

Home language<br />

The dominant home language in SDM is Sepedi with 83, 34% followed by IsiNdebele in<br />

4.4%. According to statistics, the areas that are predominantly Pedi speaking are<br />

Makhuduthamaga and Greater Tubatse. Comparing English and Afrikaans speakers, there<br />

are few English speakers in 0.22% while the Afrikaans speakers in 0.83%. Most Afrikaans<br />

speakers are in our former white only towns of Groblersdal, Marble Hall and Burgersfort.<br />

AGE STRUCTURE IN THE DISTRICT<br />

Figure 13: Age structure<br />

700000<br />

600000<br />

500000<br />

400000<br />

300000<br />

200000<br />

100000<br />

0<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

Age structure 1996-<br />

2001 (Statssa,2011)<br />

0-4 years<br />

15-64 years<br />

65+ years<br />

The age structure in the district indicates that from 1996 to 2011, the working age group from<br />

15-64 years has been on an upward trend. These are persons of school going age and<br />

those that are either in employment or seeking for employment. The age group 0-4 years<br />

has been relatively stable over time from 1996 to 2011. The very older age group 65+<br />

(pension age) has also been stable over time.<br />

The implications for this picture are that the district municipality in collaboration with other<br />

stakeholders must work on developing programmes that address matters of education and<br />

employment creation. The district does not have higher education institutions except for the<br />

former educational colleges that are mainly used for Further Education and Training (FET’s).<br />

With a population of over a million people, the district must consider working with education<br />

authorities to explore possibility of establishing an arm/satellite of University of Technology<br />

or University in the district.<br />

AGE AND GENDER


87<br />

Within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, the below – 18 age group makes up almost 50% of the population.<br />

Behind this average, lie slight variations in the different municipalities. This ranges from 51%<br />

in Makhuduthamaga (comparatively the youngest population) to 48% in Ephraim Mogale<br />

(comparatively the oldest population).<br />

Table 10: Age and gender profile<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Age group Male Female Total<br />

Fetakgomo 0-17 22,916 <strong>23</strong>,060 45,996<br />

18-64 15,816 <strong>23</strong>,996 39,812<br />

65+ 1,951 4,322 6,273<br />

Total 40,684 51,398 92,081<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 0-17 53,444 54,172 107,616<br />

18-64 40,684 51,398 92,081<br />

65+ 4,422 9,085 13,506<br />

Total 98,729 122,009 220,738<br />

Makhuduthamaga 0-17 66,600 67,468 134,068<br />

18-64 41,816 69,246 111,062<br />

65+ 5,601 12,179 17,779<br />

Total 1<strong>14</strong>,017 <strong>14</strong>8,892 262,909<br />

Ephraim Mogale 0-17 28,894 28,777 57,670<br />

18-64 24,353 32,061 56,4<strong>14</strong><br />

65+ 2,534 4,701 7,<strong>23</strong>6<br />

Total 55,780 65,539 121,320<br />

Tubatse 0-17 67,895 68,990 136,885<br />

18-64 49,252 70,351 119,603<br />

65+ 4,182 9,446 13,627<br />

Total 121,329 <strong>14</strong>8,787 270,116<br />

Total 0-17 <strong>23</strong>9,750 242,486 482,<strong>23</strong>6<br />

18-64 172,101 254,406 426,507<br />

65+ 18,689 39,733 58,422<br />

Total 430,540 536,625 967,165<br />

Stats SA Community Survey 2007<br />

The male-female ratios are almost equal in the age group below 18 years, but females are<br />

almost 60% of the population in the working age group and more than 68% in the senior age<br />

group for the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> district as a whole. It is obvious then that a significant number of<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> males have alternative residence away from the district – a fact already alluded<br />

to earlier in this chapter. The ratio is as high as 62% in Makhuduthamaga and 57% in<br />

Ephraim Mogale.<br />

MARITAL STATUS


88<br />

Figure <strong>14</strong>: Marital Status<br />

Marital status<br />

NUMBERS<br />

1000000<br />

800000<br />

600000<br />

400000<br />

200000<br />

0<br />

-200000<br />

yea 2001 202588 7161<strong>23</strong> 42821 5652<br />

Marital status<br />

year 1996 196686 675254 <strong>23</strong>173 4379<br />

Source: Census 2011<br />

married<br />

never<br />

married<br />

widowed<br />

divorced<br />

The figure shows that within the district municipality, a large chunk of the population is never<br />

married. The number of widows have also been increasing from <strong>23</strong> 173 in 1996 to 45 001 in<br />

2011. Divorce rates in the district have only stabilised from 1996 to 2011.<br />

Table 11: Marital Status<br />

STATUS 1996 2001 2011<br />

Married 196 686 202 588 246 449<br />

Never married 675 254 716 1<strong>23</strong> 779 408<br />

Widowed <strong>23</strong> 173 42 821 45 001<br />

Divorced/separated 4 379 5 652 5 982<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

EDUCATION PROFILE IN THE SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />

Figure 15: Education status<br />

250000<br />

200000<br />

150000<br />

100000<br />

50000<br />

0<br />

Education status<br />

Education status


89<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

The majority of persons within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> have some secondary<br />

school. It is also equally noticeable that 117 139 persons have no schooling in 2011. This is<br />

concerning because those who cannot read and write will not be able to access better job<br />

opportunities in the market as in most training programmes there is a need to have basic<br />

writing and reading skills. There are also very insignificant numbers of the persons that have<br />

higher education in the district.<br />

Table 12: Education status<br />

STATUS 1996 2001 2011<br />

No schooling 165 384 185 760 117 139<br />

Some Primary 39 986 52 840 63 546<br />

Completed primary 19 904 19 897 22 510<br />

Some secondary 91 228 107 671 204 571<br />

Grade 12 43 307 48 873 119 344<br />

Higher 11 665 20 482 32 757<br />

Source Census (2011)<br />

Table 13: Education profile per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Fetakg<br />

omo<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Grand Total<br />

SDM<br />

No Schooling 4.13 1.69 1.67 3.88 4.60 15.98<br />

Some Primary 5.56 2.74 3.31 8.70 6.12 26.43<br />

Education<br />

Grade 7 /Std. 5/ 1.25 0.65 0.68 1.83 1.27 5.68<br />

ABET 3<br />

Some Secondary 6.17 2.95 3.03 9.76 6.90 28.79<br />

Education<br />

Completed 1.46 0.53 0.67 1.56 0.87 5.09<br />

Secondary<br />

Education<br />

Certificate 0.33 0.11 0.22 0.57 0.22 1.45<br />

with/without<br />

GR.12<br />

Diploma<br />

0.24 0.27 0.19 0.41 0.35 1.47<br />

with/without<br />

GR.12<br />

Degree & Higher 0.21 0.08 0.12 0.19 0.18 0.77<br />

Unspecified 0.46 0.05 0.06 0.49 0.56 1.62


90<br />

Out of scope 2.88 1.22 1.47 4.11 3.02 12.71<br />

(children under 5<br />

years of age)<br />

Grant Total 22.70 10.29 11.42 31.50 24.09 100.00<br />

Source: Statistics South Africa Community Survey 2007<br />

As indicated in the tables above, the district has a relatively high illiteracy level, with almost<br />

28% of the population having no formal school education whatsoever. Only 1% of the<br />

population has obtained tertiary educational qualifications.<br />

The Limpopo Provincial Growth and Development Strategy indicate that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has<br />

the least of highly skilled individuals in the province. The low skills reduce the ability of the<br />

<strong>District</strong> to be innovative and economically productive.<br />

OUT-MIGRATION AND MALE ABSENTEEISM IN SEKHUKHUNE<br />

A striking characteristic of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> population is the high levels of male absenteeism<br />

in the <strong>District</strong>. This is the result of most males being forced to seek work outside<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. The table below is based on a sample survey in the area, and attempts to<br />

characterize the types of migrants that leave <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households to seek work in other<br />

parts of the country.<br />

Table <strong>14</strong>: Categories of migrants from <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households<br />

Category Number %<br />

Regular migrants (return every week or month) 70,257 56,8<br />

Seasonal migrants (for a limited period each year) 34,005 27,5<br />

Prolonged period away (more than 6 months at a time) 19,496 15,7<br />

Total number of absentee migrants 1<strong>23</strong>,759 100<br />

Economic migration clearly affects both current population figures and projected population<br />

growth in the <strong>District</strong>. As subsequent sections of this chapter will show, it also fundamentally<br />

affects economic planning in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. Current discussions on augmenting rail transport<br />

in the area, for example, are underpinned by analyses of the number and types of migrants<br />

who travel in and out of the area.<br />

What is undisputed is that the remittances sent back to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households by workers<br />

elsewhere contribute significantly to livelihoods in the district. The table below, also based on<br />

a sample survey, attempts to quantify the remittances received by households in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Table 15: Remittances received by <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households in 2006<br />

Number of Brackets %<br />

Less than R500 12,9<br />

R500 – R1,000 <strong>23</strong>,7<br />

R1,001 – R3,000 12,7


91<br />

More than R3,00 50,7<br />

Total 100<br />

According to the NSDP, the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has the 4 th largest out-migration (people<br />

migrating out of the <strong>District</strong>) in the country with 6.69% of its total population opting to leave<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (The Presidency, 2006). The volume and nature of migration is clearly a factor<br />

that development planners in the <strong>District</strong> need to take into account in their medium-term<br />

planning.<br />

Disability<br />

95.88% do not have disability, which means that the majority of the population does not<br />

need any disability related care in both public and private buildings. 1.34% has physical<br />

disability followed by sight at 0.68%, emotional at 0.63%, deaf at 0.55 and multiple<br />

disabilities at 0.17%. The table below illustrates the types of disabilities found in the district:<br />

Table 16: Disability Types<br />

Disability<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Fetakgomo Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Grand<br />

Total<br />

Sight (blind/severe 3.10 2.21 1.62 5.04 6.39 18.36<br />

visual limitation)<br />

Hearing (Deaf) 2.01 1.39 1.42 2.33 1.83 8.98<br />

Communication 1.42 0.49 0.21 1.74 1.94 5.79<br />

(speech Impairment)<br />

Physical (need 9.69 2.26 4.54 7.83 11.60 35.91<br />

wheelchair)<br />

Intellectual (serious 1.01 1.<strong>14</strong> 1.73 2.<strong>23</strong> 3.<strong>14</strong> 9.24<br />

difficulty in learning)<br />

Emotional<br />

5.63 1.91 1.87 3.99 3.66 17.06<br />

(Behaviour)<br />

Multiple Disabilities 0.38 1.45 0.18 0.41 2.24 4.65<br />

Grand Total <strong>23</strong>.<strong>23</strong> 10.85 11.56 <strong>23</strong>.57 30.80 100.00<br />

Source: STATS SA, Community Survey 2007<br />

Disability Development Programmes<br />

The Office of the Executive Mayor supports disabled persons community through<br />

celebrations of important calendar days covering a variety of disabilities and workshops.<br />

· Support to <strong>District</strong> Disability Forum<br />

· Deaf Awareness Campaign<br />

· Eye Care Awareness Campaign<br />

· Albinism Awareness Campaign


92<br />

Challenges<br />

· Ineffective Disability Forums<br />

· Lack of clear Policies on advancement o disable people’s needs and aspirations<br />

· Insufficient budget to implement awareness programs<br />

· Public places not accessible and use friendly for disable people<br />

Income<br />

The figures below indicate that people in the SDM have different income gaps while a huge<br />

number of people do not receive any income from any source. This analysis shows that<br />

many people in the SDM live below poverty line.<br />

Table 17: Income Groups in the SDM<br />

No income 21842<br />

R1-R4 800 17969<br />

R4 801-R9 600 3<strong>14</strong>84<br />

R9 601-R19 200 50657<br />

R19 201-R38400 45039<br />

R38 401-R76 800 18555<br />

R76 801-R153 600 9895<br />

R153 601-R307 200 5681<br />

R307 201-R6<strong>14</strong> 400 745<br />

R6<strong>14</strong> 401-R1 228 800 183<br />

R1 228 801-R2 457 600 152<br />

R2 457 or more 156<br />

Response not given <strong>14</strong>8<strong>14</strong><br />

STATSSA, Community Survey, 2007<br />

Economically Active Population<br />

The SDM like any other <strong>District</strong> in South Africa is experiencing a decline in formal job<br />

opportunities because of the general global economic meltdown. This has led to an<br />

escalating unemployment particularly among the economically active population of 18 years<br />

and above. Unemployment rate has encouraged the fast growth of informal sector in the<br />

district. The table below provides a breakdown of the employment patterns within the<br />

<strong>District</strong>.<br />

Table 18: Economically Active population<br />

Description Ephraim Tubatse Fetakgomo Elias Makhutha <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Mogale<br />

Motsoaledi maga<br />

Employment 15056 45321 7<strong>23</strong>6 39098 21978 127688<br />

Unemployment 11098 51551 11566 16725 33346 124226


93<br />

Non<br />

40787 90696 39511 79066 77494 327553<br />

economically<br />

active<br />

N/A 20,031 110,467 43,390 42,472 126,622 354,626<br />

Unspecified 40<br />

Total 87,012 298,035 101,703 176,361 259,440 934,093<br />

Source: STATS SA Community Survey 2007<br />

Employment by Industry<br />

Conventional wisdom has it that agriculture; mining and tourism are three leading sectors in<br />

the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy. Official statistics, however, paint a slightly different picture of the<br />

district economy being dominated by community services, mining and trade. It must be noted<br />

that it is very difficult to find accurate data for the local level in South Africa. Those datagathering<br />

exercises that do exist often yield vastly different accounts of local realities. Most<br />

public sector plans and <strong>IDP</strong>s, however, draw on Stats SA data even whilst recognizing some<br />

of its limitations.<br />

Table 19: The Breakdown of employment by industry in the SDM is as follows:<br />

Sectors<br />

Makhuduth<br />

amaga<br />

Fetakgomo Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Grand<br />

Total<br />

Agriculture, Hunting, 0.<strong>23</strong> 0.01 0.29 0.54 0.31 1.38<br />

Forestry and fishing<br />

Mining and Quarrying 0.02 0.39 0.02 0.03 1.72 2.18<br />

Manufacturing 0.17 0.02 0.25 0.47 0.49 1.41<br />

Electricity, Gas and 0.03 - 0.04 0.07 0.02 0.16<br />

Water Supply<br />

Construction 0.31 0.05 0.16 0.33 0.32 1.17<br />

Wholesale and retail 0.52 0.10 0.26 0.96 0.83 2.66<br />

trade<br />

Transport, Storage 0.09 0.01 0.08 0.28 0.26 0.72<br />

and communication<br />

Financial, Insurance, 0.05 - 0.19 0.44 0.44 1.12<br />

real Estate and<br />

Community, Social 0.77 0.32 0.59 1.00 0.93 3.62<br />

and personal Services<br />

Other and no 0.<strong>14</strong> 0.03 0.36 0.41 0.39 1.32<br />

adequately defined<br />

Not applicable 19.40 8.64 8.75 16.69 24.63 78.11<br />

Unspecified 1.54 0.34 0.35 1.96 1.98 6.16<br />

Grand Total <strong>23</strong>.26 9.92 11.33 <strong>23</strong>.18 32.31 100.00<br />

Source: STATS SA: Community Survey 2007


94<br />

The Three main contributors to GGP were community services (3.62%), mining (2.38%) and<br />

trade (2, 66%). Despite these findings, the district has very consciously chosen to explore<br />

the potential of mining, agriculture and tourism as key contributors to the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

economy up to the year 2025. This is also in recognition of the fact that thriving local<br />

economics should not depend overly on public sector injections of income.<br />

Mode of Transport<br />

The main modes of transport in SDM were buses, taxis and trucks. There were 45.02% of<br />

the people travel on foot to go to work and some to schools. 1.45% of the people in the<br />

<strong>District</strong> prefer to travel by taxis while 1.39% of people prefer to travel by bus. All the five local<br />

municipalities in the district depended on taxis and buses which were subsidized and some<br />

were not subsidised.<br />

3.2 SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />

3.2.1. Introduction<br />

The Spatial Development Framework (SDF) is a core component of a the <strong>Municipality</strong>‘s<br />

economic, sectorial, spatial, social, institutional, environmental vision. In other words it is<br />

a tool to achieve the desired spatial form of the <strong>Municipality</strong>. The spatial analysis provide<br />

a picture of the spatial challenges such as land use, land claims, land unavailability, land<br />

invasions, degradation of the natural environment and opportunities of the municipality.<br />

In this document we have discussed the status qou of spatial development within the<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> district municipality which outlined the following characteristics and trends:<br />

· Spatial Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the <strong>District</strong><br />

· Spatial Concentrations of Population<br />

· Population Growth Areas / Points<br />

· Local Service Points<br />

· Economic Activity Concentration<br />

· Centers of Agricultural Production<br />

· Operational Mines in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

· Existing Land Use and Related Potential<br />

· Spatial Economic Development Opportunities<br />

3.2.2. Status Quo<br />

Spatial Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the <strong>District</strong>


95<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) developed its first Spatial Development<br />

Framework (SDF) in 2004 which was adopted by Council and it is reviewed annually.<br />

The SDF is aligned to both NSDP and LEGDP.<br />

Spatial Concentrations of Population<br />

The total population of the <strong>District</strong> is currently estimated at approximately 1 090,424<br />

(Census, 2011). The below map gives an account of the population spread per each Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

Figure 16- SDM Population Distribution Map<br />

It reveals geographical disparities and a dispersed settlement pattern with few dominant<br />

concentration points.


96<br />

The account of this spatial structure and settlement pattern is the result of the spatial policies<br />

promoted by the former apartheid dispensation. As a result, the space economy of SDM is<br />

characterized by a geographical split between former homeland areas, and areas which fell<br />

outside of the former homelands of Lebowa and KwaNdebele. Furthermore, the potential<br />

burgeoning of mining, agricultural, and tourism activities within the <strong>District</strong> presents spatial<br />

challenges of its own, amidst the inherited spatial challenges.<br />

Land which formed part of the former homeland areas of KwaNdebele and Lebowa is<br />

generally characterized by low-density residential areas spreading over vast areas of land,<br />

and mainly occurs in two clusters – the Moutse area to the south-west and the central area<br />

around Jane Furse. Characteristically, residential areas located within the western extents of<br />

the <strong>District</strong> are more densely populated / developed than those in the north due their<br />

proximity to Gauteng. Conversely, land which fell outside of the former homelands are<br />

generally characterized by private / commercial farms, and medium density settlements<br />

clustered around semi-urban centres featuring retail and service-related activities.<br />

More specifically, the SDM features approximately 605 sparsely populated and dispersed<br />

rural settlements, with Groblersdal, Marble Hall, Burgersfort, Jane Furse, Ohrigstad,<br />

Steelpoort and Driekop constituting the main/first order urban centres. The spatial location of<br />

these first order centres generally coincide with the <strong>District</strong>’s two dominant economic activity<br />

areas.<br />

Essentially, apart from having been influenced by the spatial demarcation of the former<br />

homeland areas, the spatial occurrence of settlements has been influenced by:<br />

· The spatial location of major agricultural and mining activity areas;<br />

· The spatial location of major rivers traversing the <strong>District</strong>; and<br />

· The spatial location of major roads such as the R37 and R579.<br />

Of utmost importance for the future spatial planning and development of the <strong>District</strong>, are the<br />

expected population concentration and growth areas. The reason being, that these areas not<br />

only serve to indicate where the greatest need for infrastructure spending could<br />

possibly be in the future, but also indicate where the municipality would receive the best<br />

value for money spent on infrastructure development and service provision. The<br />

existing Integrated Spatial Development Framework (ISDF) (2004) for the SDM identifies the<br />

expected population concentration and growth areas / points of the district.<br />

A. Population Growth Areas / Points<br />

Growth points are individual settlements or settlement areas which feature strong economic,<br />

social and institutional activities. Table 20 indicates the expected population growth points<br />

for the SDM.<br />

Table 20: Expected Population Growth Areas / Points for the SDM.


97<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> % of people Provincial <strong>District</strong> Municipal<br />

Residing in Growth Growth Growth Growth Points<br />

Points and Points Points<br />

Population<br />

Concentration<br />

Points<br />

Greater Tubatse 38% Burgersfort Steelpoort Mecklenburg<br />

Driekop<br />

Ohrigstad<br />

Ephraim Mogale 66% Marble Hall - Van Der<br />

Merweskraal<br />

Elandskraal<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 61% Groblersdal - Monsterlus<br />

Motetema<br />

Fetakgomo 39% - - Apel<br />

Makhuduthamaga 51% Jane Furse Phokwane<br />

Source: Integrated Spatial Development Framework for the SDM, 2004<br />

Of the total <strong>14</strong> growth points in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, 5 are situated within Greater Tubatse, followed<br />

by Elias Motsoaledi and Ephraim Mogale with 3 each, Makhuduthamaga with 2, and lastly<br />

Fetakgomo with only one growth point, (see figure 16).<br />

Figure 17- SDM Growth Point


98<br />

B. Local Service Points:<br />

This includes settlements that have the potential for development based on population<br />

growth, or servicing function potential. The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has a total of <strong>23</strong> settlements<br />

falling under this category. The distribution of these settlements, per municipality, is<br />

summarized as follows:<br />

· Fetakgomo (9);<br />

· Greater Tubatse (7),<br />

· Makhuduthamaga (4);<br />

· Elias Motsoaledi (2); and<br />

· Ephraim Mogale (1).<br />

The challenge facing the <strong>District</strong> will be to ensure the sustainable development of these<br />

population concentration and growth points, without neglecting the needs of the remaining<br />

extents of the <strong>Municipality</strong>.


99<br />

Economic Activity Concentration<br />

Economic Activity is predominantly concentrated in two areas, and include the local<br />

municipalities of Ephraim Mogale (former Greater Marble Hall), Elias Motsoaledi (former<br />

Groblersdal) to the West, and Tubatse to the East. These areas also host the five main<br />

urban centres. Whilst the South-Western economic activity area is primarily centred on<br />

platinum mining activities associated with the Merensky Reef.<br />

With less than ten percent (10%) of the total capacity of the Reef having been unlocked to<br />

date, the platinum economy is still within its infant stage. Tourism activities forming part of<br />

both of the economic activity areas are primarily related to Nature Tourism, Game Farming<br />

and Hunting.<br />

Figure 18- Centres of Agricultural Production<br />

Source:<br />

CENTRES OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION 4


100<br />

Figure 19 – Operational Mines in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Existing Land Use and Related Potential<br />

Land use is a complex issue, and is partially the result of the physical planning policies of the<br />

former apartheid government, which split the <strong>District</strong> between former homeland areas,<br />

private farms and small towns. Today, apart from issues pertaining to land ownership<br />

patterns, mining, agricultural and tourism activities bring distinctive spatial challenges of their<br />

own to the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Presently, land use within the SDM is dominated by commercial and subsistence farming.<br />

This is especially true in the Fetakgomo, Makhuduthamaga, Ephraim Mogale and Greater<br />

Tubatse Local Municipal areas. The second most significant land use is the potential<br />

conservation areas, especially within the Elias Motsoaledi and Ephraim Mogale Municipal<br />

areas. These potential conservation areas may eventually encompass roughly one third of


101<br />

Elias Motsoaledi and Ephraim Mogale. The different land use patterns in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> are captured in Table 21 below.<br />

Table 21: Land Use Patterns in the SDM<br />

Land use type Area in sq km % of total<br />

Agricultural: Commercial 1,135 7,7<br />

Agricultural: Subsistence 2,683 18,1<br />

Potential conservation 3,484 <strong>23</strong>,5<br />

Active conservation 463 3,1<br />

Active mining 37 0,2<br />

Other 7,030 47,4<br />

Total <strong>14</strong>,832 100<br />

Source: Department of Land Affairs (2006). Land Cover Map cited in M Maila (2006)<br />

Disconcertingly, land is becoming an increasingly scarce commodity within the <strong>District</strong>. This<br />

is equally true of rural, semi-rural / semi-urban areas. This is a particularly significant<br />

situation, given the growing importance of agriculture, mining and tourism (all potentially<br />

conflicting land uses) to the <strong>District</strong>’s economy. Furthermore, the <strong>District</strong>’s developing<br />

economic nodes appear to be attracting an increasing number of people, thereby creating<br />

higher population concentrations in certain parts of the district. This is especially true of the<br />

Jane Furse – Phokwane development node in Makhuduthamaga, the Bothashoek-Praktiseer<br />

area (Tubatse) and the Atok Area (Fetakgomo).<br />

SPATIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES<br />

Transport Network<br />

As mentioned, the <strong>District</strong>’s transport network is largely limited to a number of arterials which<br />

provide regional accessibility, rather than local accessibility. From East to West, these<br />

include the N11, R25, R33, R579, R555, R37 and R36. Hence, regional accessibility is<br />

predominantly facilitated via three roads traversing the <strong>District</strong> in a North-West – South-East<br />

alignment (N11, R579 and R37), one road traversing the <strong>District</strong> in a North-East – South-<br />

West alignment (R555), and the R36. Together these roads constitute the main freight and<br />

logistics corridors connecting the <strong>District</strong>’s economic activity areas to prominent provincial<br />

nodes and economic activity areas falling outside of the <strong>District</strong> – e.g. Mookgopong,<br />

Mokopane, Polokwane, Lydenburg and Middleburg. The presence of the Klein Drakensberg<br />

and Strydpoortberge hinders connectivity to the north-east.<br />

More specifically, the N11 Freeway connects the town of Marble Hall and Groblersdal with<br />

Mookgopong and the N2 Freeway towards the North-West, which leads to Mokopane and<br />

Polokwane. To the South, the N11 connects Marble Hall and Groblersdal with Middleburg,<br />

which is situated along the N4 Maputo Corridor. The R579 traverses the central extents of<br />

the district, and serves to connect Jane Furse and Monsterlus with Lebowakgomo towards<br />

the North, and Sehlakwane and Stoffberg towards the South.


102<br />

The R37 traverses the northern extents of the <strong>District</strong>, and serves to connect Burgersfort<br />

with Lebowakgomo towards the North-West and Lydenburg towards the South-East the<br />

R555 traverses the Eastern extents of the district, and serves to connect Steelpoort and<br />

Burgersfort with Stoffberg towards the South-East. These two roads from the Dilokong<br />

Platinum Corridor, once past Burgersfort, R555 become the R36 which serves to connect<br />

the Burgersfort / Steelpoort area with Ohrigstad, and down to Lydenburg.<br />

Although the majority of the major urban centres and smaller towns are located along these<br />

roads, vast number of settlements within the Western, Central, and Eastern extents of the<br />

<strong>District</strong> are only accessible via secondary gravel roads. There is however relatively little<br />

economic activity within these areas to justify the construction of additional tar roads.<br />

The general condition of roads within the SDM is poor. Severe damage such as potholes,<br />

cracks, and rutting can be observed along most roads. Road damage is particularly<br />

prevalent along the following sections of road:<br />

· The R33 between Groblersdal and Stoffberg;<br />

· The R555 between Stofberg and Rossenekal;<br />

· The R579 between Nebo and Stofberg; and<br />

· The R25 between Dennilton and Groblersdal.<br />

To ensure alignment with the Limpopo Employment Growth and Development Plan<br />

(LEGDP), the <strong>District</strong> has prioritized its roads forming part of the Dilokong and Phalaborwa<br />

Corridors, and includes the following stretches of road;<br />

· The Dilokong Corridor<br />

- Polokwane to Burgersfort (P33/1 and P33/2) (R37), via Mafefe.<br />

- Flag Boshielo Dam through Lebowakgomo and Mafefe, linking the <strong>District</strong> with the<br />

Phalaborwa and Kruger National Park areas.<br />

- Chueniespoort via Boyne to Mankweng.<br />

· The Phalaborwa Corridor<br />

- Ohrigstad via the Strijdom Tunnel.<br />

- Burgersfort to Oaks.<br />

Apart from its road network, the SDM is served by three railway lines which were originally<br />

developed to support the mining activity within the district. The three railway lines are:<br />

· The railway line entering the SDM from the South, next to Stoffberg, from where it<br />

continues northwards for approximately 30km, eventually ending at an abandoned<br />

mine near the Mapochs Mine.


103<br />

· The railway line entering the SDM from the West, near Nutfield, from where it<br />

continues eastwards to Marble Hall.<br />

· The railway line entering the SDM from the East, passing near Ohrigstad and<br />

Burgersfort, and ending near Steelpoort (near the Tubatse mine).<br />

Unfortunately, these railway lines have not yet been extended or re-routed to serve later /<br />

new mining operations (such as those along the Merensky Reef and Chrome layers).<br />

Consequently, shortcomings in the railway network are resulting in extreme pressure being<br />

place on the road network. Favourably, a new commuter rail link between Pretoria and the<br />

South-West of the SDM (along the Moloto Road) is being considered. This rail link will<br />

improve accessibility to Gauteng, which represent an employment area for many residing<br />

within the South-Western extents of the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

In addition to the road and railway network of the <strong>District</strong>, two registered airfields are also<br />

found within the <strong>District</strong>. The airfields are located in Marble Hall and Groblersdal<br />

respectively, and primarily support crop spraying activities.<br />

Figure 20- SDM Transport Network<br />

Mining<br />

Modern mining has been practiced in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> for well over a century, and typically<br />

involved (as is still the case today) the extraction of and alusite, asbestos, chromite and<br />

platinum deposits from the Merensky Reef, which forms part of the mineral rich Bushveld


104<br />

Complex. In fact, the <strong>District</strong> features the world’s largest deposit of the platinum group<br />

metals (PGMs). What is striking about previous bouts of mining activity in the area is how<br />

changing commodity prices affected the opening, closing and, occasionally, re-opening of<br />

mines. When prices rose, new exploration and development took place in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

mining sector. Conversely, when prices fell, mines in the area closed. This is an important<br />

characteristic to take into consideration when providing infrastructure and housing to support<br />

expanding mining operations.<br />

Currently, 17 operational mines are found within the district, with the majority of activity<br />

situated along the Dilokong Corridor (R37 and R555). The Dilokong corridor stretches across<br />

the Fetakgomo and Greater Tubatse LMs respectively (see Figure 19). Some isolated<br />

activities are found within the Ephraim Mogale LM. Major mining companies operating in the<br />

SDM (2006) include Anglo Platinum, Xstrata, BHP Billiton, Implants, ASA Metals and Marula<br />

Platinum. In spite of the involvement of major mining companies, mining in the district has<br />

not yet reached full production limits. Consequently, a number of new developments are<br />

expected to take place. These include:<br />

- Eleven new platinum and chrome mines over the next three years, possibly creating<br />

17 000 direct jobs.<br />

- A R2 billion smelter plant is being considered for construction in Tubatse, possibly<br />

creating 1200 jobs.<br />

Figure 19 illustrates where the bulk of the platinum mining activity will take place within the<br />

<strong>District</strong> in the future. New mining activities within the Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi<br />

LMs could potentially create land use conflicts between mining and agricultural activities.<br />

Furthermore, new mining activities may result in increasing pressure being placed on<br />

environmentally sensitive areas found within the North-Eastern and South-Eastern extents of<br />

the <strong>District</strong>. Table 22 sets out the main existing (operational), and planned platinum mines in<br />

the district.<br />

Table 22: Existing (Operational) and Planned Mines in the SDM.<br />

Mine Controlling company Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Expansion in progress or production building up<br />

Lebowa Platinum Angloplat Fetakgomo LM<br />

Modikwa<br />

Angloplat<br />

Tubatse LM<br />

African Rainbow Minerals<br />

Mototolo Angloplat Tubatse LM<br />

Everest South Aquarius Within 30km of SDM<br />

Two Rivers African Rainbow Minerals Tubatse LM<br />

Marula UG2 Implants Tubatse LM<br />

Bankable feasibility study completed<br />

Blue Ridge Ridge Elias Motsoaledi LM<br />

Bankable feasibility study planned or underway<br />

Sheba’s Rige Ridge Elias Motsoaledi LM


105<br />

Mine Controlling company Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Smokey Hills Platinum Australia Tubatse LM<br />

Twickenham Angloplat Tubatse LM<br />

Mareesburg Eastern Plats Tubatse LM<br />

Marula Merensky Implants Tubatse LM<br />

Pre-feasibility study in progress or completed<br />

Kennedy’s Vale Eastern Plats Tubatse LM<br />

Der Brochen Angloplat Tubatse LM<br />

Booysensdal Angloplat Within 30km of SDM<br />

Advanced Exploration<br />

Ga-Phasha Angloplat Fetakgomo LM<br />

Loskop Boynton Elias Motsoaledi LM<br />

Early Exploration<br />

Grootboom Boynton Tubatse LM<br />

Tjate Jubilee Tubatse LM<br />

Kliprivier Nkwe Within 30km of SDM<br />

Tinderbox Placer Dome Elias Motsoaledi LM<br />

Berg Platfields Within 30km of SDM<br />

Source: Goode R and Granville, A (2006). Mining expansion and employment in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> land:<br />

Expectations and impediments<br />

The projected number of employment opportunities in platinum mining / near the SDM up to<br />

2015 is set out in Table <strong>23</strong>. Importantly, based on the below mentioned statistics,<br />

Burgersfort is set to become a city in the next 10-15 years.<br />

Table <strong>23</strong>: Projected Employment in Platinum Mining within / near the SDM up to 2015<br />

Year Production (k-oz) Employees<br />

2005 652 <strong>14</strong>,067<br />

2006 700 <strong>14</strong>,570<br />

2007 931 18,665<br />

2008 1,412 27,287<br />

2009 1,710 31,860<br />

2010 2,028 36,427<br />

2011 2,266 39,252<br />

2012 2,495 41,666<br />

<strong>2013</strong> 2,597 41,806<br />

20<strong>14</strong> 2,693 41,786<br />

2015 2,856 42,730<br />

Source: Goode, R and Granville, A (2006). Mining expansion and employment in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Land:<br />

Expectations and Impediments<br />

Agriculture


106<br />

Agriculture in the SDM is a mixture of both commercial and subsistence farming. The South-<br />

Western corner of the <strong>District</strong> (Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi LMs) specifically,<br />

contains one of the largest clusters of commercial agricultural production in South Africa<br />

(see Figure 18). However, in spite of being an important contributor to employment within<br />

the <strong>District</strong>, agriculture remains a relatively marginal contributor (approximately 9, 7%) to the<br />

aggregate GGP of the <strong>District</strong>. Water scarcity, and the uncertainty created by land claims are<br />

unfortunately discouraging the expansion of commercial agricultural activities.<br />

Essentially, commercial agriculture in the SDM is concentrated in two main areas:<br />

· The South-Western part of the <strong>District</strong> (near Groblersdal and Marble Hall) (the<br />

Loskop Scheme); and<br />

· The Eastern section of the <strong>District</strong> (near Burgersfort and Ohrigstad) (the Ohrigstad<br />

Scheme)<br />

Subsistence farming predominates in the ex-homeland areas of the north and western sides<br />

of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> district. These areas are dependent on dryland farming. The agricultural<br />

activities within these ex-homeland areas are however of a less-intensive nature and largely<br />

focused on subsistence.<br />

i. The Loskop Scheme<br />

The towns of Groblersdal and Marble Hall are found within the Loskop Valley. The<br />

commercial agricultural schemes in this valley are serviced by the Loskop Dam. In addition<br />

of the Loskop scheme, there are 5 smaller schemes within the Loskop agricultural area,<br />

namely:<br />

· The Moosrivier scheme;<br />

· The Hereford Scheme;<br />

· The Olifants River Scheme;<br />

· The Elands River Scheme; and<br />

· The Selons River Scheme.<br />

Collectively, these contribute significantly to commercial agriculture in the area.<br />

ii.<br />

The Ohrigstad scheme<br />

The Ohrigstad Scheme is supplied with irrigation water from the Ohrigstad Dam along the<br />

Ohrigstad River. The total area currently being irrigated is estimated at roughly 4,500<br />

hectares.<br />

Alternatively described, the agricultural activities within the SDM tend to be concentrated<br />

along the following routes:


107<br />

· The entire length of the N11 throughout the <strong>District</strong>;<br />

· The R573 from Ephraim Mogale to the <strong>District</strong> boundary;<br />

· The R25 between Dennilton and Groblersdal;<br />

· The minor road linking the R573 and R25 between Groblersdal and Marble Hall;<br />

· The R36 as far North as Branddraai; and<br />

· The Southern section of the R37 as far North as Burgersfort<br />

Tourism<br />

The <strong>District</strong> hosts the scenic Flag Boshielo Dam area, the adjoining Schuinsdraai Nature<br />

Reserve, Potlake Nature Reserve and the Maleoskop Resort and Conservancy.<br />

Furthermore, the <strong>District</strong> has recently established the Kamoka Open Africa Route, which<br />

could be linked with the existing African Ivory and Cultural Heartland routes and the planned<br />

Great Limpopo Route.<br />

Currently, an estimated 84 accommodation facilities, offering 2,627 beds are found<br />

throughout the SDM. The tourism sector also employs approximately 962 persons. The table<br />

below sets out the accommodation facilities currently available in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Table 24: Accommodation Facilities in the SDM.<br />

Municipal Area No. of No. of Occupancy Turnover Staff<br />

Facilities Beds rate (%)<br />

Employment<br />

Tubatse 20 1,278 67 47,200,000 432<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 24 577 59 20,200,000 222<br />

Ephraim Mogale 29 677 54 <strong>23</strong>,000,000 260<br />

Fetakgomo 1 20 n/a 200,000 12<br />

Makhuduthamaga 6 75 62 2,600,000 36<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 81 2,627 62 93 200,000 962<br />

Yet, in spite of existing tourism attractions and facilities, and although tourism has been<br />

identified as one of the major growth sectors in the SDM, the <strong>District</strong> lacks a major product to<br />

draw a significant volume of holiday tourists to the area. A major draw card could however<br />

firmly place <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> on established tourist routes to the Blyde River Canyon and Kruger<br />

Park.<br />

Spatial Development Objectives<br />

The following are the development objectives to be achieved as part of the Spatial<br />

Development Framework for the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>:<br />

· To actively protect, enhance and manage the natural environmental resources in the<br />

municipality in order to ensure a sustainable equilibrium between the mining, tourism<br />

and agricultural industries in the area.


108<br />

· To optimally capitalize on the strategic location of the <strong>District</strong> by way of strengthening<br />

of internal and external linkages within provincial and regional context.<br />

· To utilized the natural environmental and cultural historic features in the <strong>District</strong> as<br />

anchors from which to promote ecotourism and conservation.<br />

· To maximally utilize the mining potential in the district by way of the development of<br />

the Dilokong Corridor.<br />

· To promote commercial farming and food production along the Olifants River and<br />

Steelpoort River drainage systems in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

· To facilitate small scale and subsistence farming activities throughout the remainder<br />

part of the municipal area.<br />

· To promote industrial/commercial development in the <strong>District</strong> with specific emphasis<br />

on Agri-processing in the agricultural belt (Groblersdal), and mining/ore-processing in<br />

the mining belt and agricultural belt to one another, and to the other markets of<br />

Gauteng Province along the Moloto Corridor.<br />

· To supplement the <strong>District</strong> east-west corridor by way of three functional north-south<br />

corridors:<br />

- N11: Agriculture, Commercial<br />

- R583: Institutional, Residential<br />

- R33: Mining<br />

· To ensure equitable access to social infrastructure and to promote Local Economic<br />

Development by way of an evenly distributed range of Multi-Purpose Community<br />

Centres to be established throughout the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

· To consolidate the urban structure of the district around the highest order centres by<br />

way infill development and densification in Strategic Development Areas.<br />

· To establish a functional hierarchy of towns and settlements in the <strong>District</strong> based on<br />

the regional function and spatial distribution of these centres.<br />

Strategic Development Areas<br />

The currently dispersed settlement structure of the <strong>District</strong> has not only resulted in the costly<br />

duplication of essential community services and infrastructure, but has left some<br />

communities without access to these. Hence, proper planning in respect of the placement of<br />

the provision of resources is necessary to bring about an even, equitable, and cost-effective<br />

distribution of essential community services and infrastructure throughout the entire<br />

municipal area.<br />

To achieve this, the SDF proposes the establishment of a functional hierarchy of towns<br />

and settlements, as well as the establishment of a hierarchy of service centres<br />

throughout the entire municipal area by way of Multi-Purpose Community Centre (MPCC)<br />

development. Such an approach to the delivery of community services is aligned with both<br />

Comprehensive Rural Development Strategy, and the DM’s LED strategy which strives to<br />

promote nodal development. Establishing a hierarchy of services centres in the form of<br />

MPCCs holds the following advantages:


109<br />

· Contributes towards urban-rural restructuring and environmental protection by means<br />

of promoting nodal development. Nodal development is conducive to targeted<br />

infrastructure spending, local economic development and corridor development;<br />

· Promotes comprehensive regional development;<br />

· Helps to speed-up infrastructure development and service delivery;<br />

· Reduces the levels of inequality in living standards and access to basic services<br />

between rural and urban areas – ensures that all communities have access to at<br />

least the minimum levels of services as enshrined in the constitution;<br />

· Basic services are provided by government in a financially sustainable manner;<br />

· Provides government with a platform from which to develop energy centres, telecentres<br />

and information technology infrastructure within rural areas;<br />

· Provides a platform for entrepreneurship and small business development (LED);<br />

· Provides guidance for the development and provision of engineering services:<br />

· Indicates where to provide tarred road infrastructure and multi-modal transport<br />

facilities; and<br />

· Helps to determine public transport service points and routes.<br />

In terms of establishing a hierarchy of towns and settlements for the <strong>District</strong>, the SDF<br />

proposes the following (see Figure 20):<br />

Table 25: Hierarchy of settlements<br />

1 st order Settlements<br />

Provincial Growth <strong>District</strong> Growth Municipal Growth Points<br />

Points<br />

Points<br />

Marble Hall,<br />

Burgersfort,<br />

Groblersdal<br />

Steelpoort and Jane<br />

Furse<br />

Ga- Nchabeleng<br />

Ga- Nkwana<br />

Maesela-<br />

Mahlabaphooko<br />

Makurwaneng<br />

Masweneng<br />

Sesehu<br />

Elandskraal<br />

Van Der Merves<br />

kraal<br />

Hlogotlou<br />

Mmotwaneng<br />

Monsterlus Town<br />

Phokwane<br />

Tafelkop<br />

Thabaleboto<br />

Orighstad<br />

Mooihoek<br />

Mashibishane<br />

Magakale<br />

Driekop<br />

Ga-kgete<br />

Dipururung<br />

Mochadi<br />

Mogodi<br />

Mohlarekoma<br />

Nebo<br />

Tlame<br />

Primary Nodes<br />

- Burgersfort as the primary mining and industrial node of the <strong>District</strong>.


110<br />

- Marble Hall as the primary business and agricultural node of the district.<br />

- Groblersdal as the primary business and agricultural node of the district.<br />

Based on a 20km services radius, the above mentioned nodes will be able to service almost<br />

the entire municipal area, if developed to their full potential. A number of settlements will<br />

however still be isolated from the services offered by these nodes, which reinforces the need<br />

for the development of MPCCs throughout the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Secondary Nodes<br />

- Steelpoort<br />

- Jane Furse<br />

- Ohristad<br />

These nodes primarily been identified based on their regional accessibility, their central<br />

locations within the two primary economic activity areas, their status as growth points, and<br />

for coinciding with existing or proposed new bulk water distribution infrastructure.<br />

As mentioned, in order to bring about an even, equitable, and cost-effective distribution of<br />

essential community services and infrastructure throughout the entire municipal area, the<br />

SDF also proposes the establishment of a hierarchy of service centres, based on a 10km<br />

services radius (see Figure 6).<br />

Taking into consideration the overall development strategy for the <strong>District</strong>, which seeks to<br />

consolidate the fragment and dispersed settlement structure, the SDF proposes a phased<br />

development approach. This implies that the <strong>Municipality</strong> should first develop all the 1 st<br />

Order Priority MPCCs, before moving onto the second and third order ones. The<br />

development order, total number, and spatial location of the proposed services centres, were<br />

determined by taking into consideration the growth points, the population concentration<br />

points, the primary and secondary routes, as well as existing and proposed bulk<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Importantly, to ensure that the <strong>Municipality</strong> lives up to its Constitutional obligation whilst<br />

striving to consolidate the dispersed settlement structure, the SDF proposes that the<br />

proposed Thusong Service Centres (TSC) should form the focal point of infrastructure<br />

provision within the rural extents of the DM.<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> is spread over former homeland areas, commercial farms, towns<br />

and semi-urban centres. According to the Limpopo Spatial Rationale Study (2002),<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has roughly 605 settlements which are fairly dispersed. There are a number of<br />

ways of classifying settlement patterns. A particularly useful delineation, however, may be<br />

found in the Integrated Spatial Development Framework, which identifies four dominant<br />

Patterns in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />

This includes first order settlements, which encompasses all provincial, district and local<br />

growth points. In addition, second order settlements are those areas with a sizeable


NP 364<br />

M ookgo po ng<br />

NP354<br />

Pol ok wa ne<br />

CBL C3<br />

Mar bl e Hal l<br />

CBD MA 3<br />

NP 355<br />

Lep ell e-N k um pi<br />

CBL C4<br />

Gr ob ler sda l<br />

NP 03A3<br />

Feta kg om o<br />

NP 03A2<br />

Mak hudu tam ag a<br />

C BLC 5<br />

Tub atse<br />

NP 04A1<br />

Dr ake nsber g<br />

111<br />

population but that are found outside the primary first order settlements. Third order<br />

settlements are local services points with some potential for future growth. Finally, fourth<br />

order settlements are scattered small settlements with very little potential for growth.<br />

The first order settlements are of particular interest to this <strong>IDP</strong>. In 1999, the Limpopo Spatial<br />

Rationale identified the following:<br />

Table 26: Growth Points in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> % of people Provincial<br />

residing in growth growth points<br />

points<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

growth points<br />

Municipal<br />

growth points<br />

Tubatse 38% Burgersfort Steelpoort Mecklenburg<br />

Driekop<br />

Ohrigstad<br />

Ephraim Mogale 66% Marble Hall N/A Van Der<br />

Merweskraal<br />

Elandskraal<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 61% Groblersdal N/A Monstelus<br />

Motetema<br />

Fetakgomo 39% N/A N/A Apel<br />

Makhuduthamaga 51% N/A Jane Furse Phokwane<br />

Source: Limpopo Spatial Rationale (1999), reproduced in SDM undated). Integrated Spatial Development<br />

Framework<br />

This is graphically depicted in the map below.<br />

Figure 21 – Growth points in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

Mop an i<br />

DC33<br />

Cap rico rn<br />

DC35<br />

CB D C4<br />

Boh labela<br />

DC36<br />

Wat erberg<br />

CBD C3<br />

Sek huk hun e<br />

Clusters<br />

Provincial G rowth Point<br />

<strong>District</strong> Growth Point<br />

Municipal Grow th Point<br />

Population Concentration Point<br />

Local Services Point


112<br />

Source: Procurement Dynamics (undated). Synthesis report of the research<br />

Stimulating the continued development of these growth points, whilst simultaneously<br />

ensuring balanced sustainable development throughout the <strong>District</strong>, is likely to be a key<br />

challenge for the municipality in the next few years.<br />

Land Use<br />

Land use within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> is dominated by subsistence farming. This is<br />

especially true in the Fetakgomo, Makhuduthamaga, Ephraim Mogale and Greater Tubatse<br />

municipal areas.<br />

The second significant land use is the potential conservation areas, especially within the<br />

Elias Motsoaledi and Ephraim Mogale municipal areas. These potential conservation areas<br />

may eventually encompass roughly one third of Elias Motsoaledi and Marble Hall.<br />

The different land use patterns in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> are captured in the table below.<br />

Table 27: Land use patterns in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Land use types Area in sq km % of total<br />

Agricultural: Commercial 1,135 7,7<br />

Agricultural: Subsistence 2,683 18,1<br />

Potential conservation 3,484 <strong>23</strong>,5<br />

Active conservation 463 3,1<br />

Active mining 37 0,2<br />

Other 7,030 47,4<br />

Total <strong>14</strong>,832 100<br />

Source: Department of Land Affairs (2006). Land Cover Map. Cited in M Maila (2006), op cit<br />

It is also becoming apparent that land is growing increasingly scarce in the <strong>District</strong>, within the<br />

urban, rural and semi-rural areas equally. <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> and Local Municipalities have<br />

recognized this as a challenge, and have prioritized the issue. This is particularly significant<br />

given the growing importance of agriculture, mining and tourism – all potentially conflicting<br />

land uses – to the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy.<br />

Land Use Management<br />

An even more complex issue within the <strong>District</strong>, however, is that of land use management.<br />

The land issue is a potentially difficult one in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, with the <strong>District</strong> being governed<br />

by a dual system. Under the traditional system, land allocation (and, therefore, land use) is<br />

the prerogative of tribal council – and this system dominates in much of the <strong>District</strong>’s formal<br />

towns and, to some extent, the adjacent townships.<br />

The traditional system is rendered more complex by the fact that each of the approximately<br />

70 traditional authorities in the area has its own unique land use management system. In<br />

general, however, each traditional authority allocates land to a subject for either residential


113<br />

use or subsistence farming. In addition, subjects would also have unlimited access to<br />

communal grazing system, however, is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain, given the<br />

growing demand for land (for s range of purposes). Furthermore, the traditional land use<br />

management system is unwritten and therefore often subject to interpretation.<br />

In recent years, the boundaries between different traditional authority areas have become<br />

increasingly blurred. This has led, in part, to the lodging of competing land claims in many<br />

parts of the <strong>District</strong>¹. It has also led to the growth of informal settlement activities within some<br />

traditional authority areas. This is especially prevalent around district growth points like<br />

Burgersfort, Atok and Jane Furse and is undoubtedly a reflection of economic migration<br />

towards potential centres of economic activity.<br />

Recent trends<br />

According to background research done for the <strong>District</strong>’s 2025 Development Strategy,<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s developing economic nodes appear to be attracting an increasing number of<br />

people, thereby creating higher population concentrations in certain parts of the <strong>District</strong>. This<br />

is especially true of the Jane Furse-Phokwane Development node in Makhuduthamaga, as<br />

well as the Bothashoek-Praktiseer area (Tubatse) and the Atok area (Fetakgomo).<br />

In the hinterlands, by contrast, land uses such as conservation appear to be developing<br />

more rapidly. This is particularly the case within the local municipal areas of Ephraim<br />

Mogale, Elias Motsoaledi and Tubatse.<br />

Finally, the central municipal areas of Makhuduthamaga and Fetakgomo are characterized<br />

by mixed land uses of subsistence farming and residential uses.<br />

Land issues may lead to future social tensions<br />

In summary, the land issue is potentially a source of tension in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area. There<br />

is a latent tension between the traditional (tribal council) and modern (legalized) land use<br />

management systems. There is also a number of competing land claims in the area, which<br />

have not been resolved by the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform<br />

(DRDLR) as yet. Finally, as the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy boom, there is likely to be competing<br />

land demands by the different economic sectors. If the district population grows in response<br />

to this foreseen economic boom, domestic demand for (commercial and residential) land will<br />

become a competitor in this arena as well.<br />

Land claims in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

The total numbers of 850 land claims, which cover 75% of the land in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, are also<br />

causing major land shortages for the district. Most of these claims are not likely to be<br />

resolved soon as they are on tribal land and need tenure reform rather than restitution. The<br />

Act that will cover tenure reform in South Africa is still a Bill. This means that 75% of the land<br />

in the district will still remain under dispute for the foreseeable future.


1<strong>14</strong><br />

The nature of number of claims in the district makes development difficult, particularly as we<br />

are faced with competing claims and those lodged by one chief against another. These kinds<br />

of claims have the greatest potential of causing instability amongst communities – and it is a<br />

situation that we as a <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> need to monitor carefully. However, it also requires<br />

high-level interventions from other spheres of government.<br />

The modern land use management system, on the contrary, is based on fairly systematic<br />

recording of land use rights. This system compels land developers to develop their individual<br />

land plots within the parameters of a particular zoning scheme. This type of land use<br />

management occurs largely in the formalized towns such as Burgersfort, Ephraim Mogale<br />

and Groblersdal.<br />

Land use management in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, then, is a complex issue that requires interventions<br />

on a number of different fronts. There are currently some measures to address the situation.<br />

The Limpopo Department of Local Government and Housing, for instance, is assisting the<br />

local municipalities with the development and review of Spatial Development Frameworks<br />

(SDFs) which will address some of these problems. In addition, the <strong>District</strong> is also<br />

conducting land use awareness programme for various stakeholders as well as developing<br />

district wide Land Use Management Schemes. However, much more needs to be done to<br />

resolve the municipality of spatial issues in the district. Once resolved, these will unlock<br />

enormous development potential in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />

3.2.3. Challenges<br />

Land ownership patterns are one of the biggest development challenges facing <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />

Without a resolution of this issue, most socio-economic activities in the <strong>District</strong> will continue<br />

to be thwarted.<br />

The Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003 are in operation and<br />

have been implemented in Limpopo Province. The Act has enabled the MEC for Local<br />

Government and Housing to appoint representatives of the Traditional Leaders in the area of<br />

the jurisdiction of the SDM to participate in the SDM Council as provided for in the Systems<br />

Act.<br />

Land administration remains a bone of contention between the traditional and the municipal<br />

administrations. Land administration needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency for<br />

effective development of rural communities. Our five municipalities remain with a challenge<br />

of land allocation for either residential or development priorities because traditional<br />

leadership are also having the responsibilities of allocating sites to residents. Traditional<br />

leaders allocate sites without engaging the municipalities to ascertain issues relating to<br />

township establishment and land development requirements. Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

is the case in point that needs to be addressed to effect development. The <strong>District</strong>, Local<br />

municipalities and traditional leadership should devise a system of engagement and<br />

cooperation in order to address some of these challenges.


115<br />

The question of service boundaries for Provincial and National spheres of government needs<br />

further attention with a view of alignment of these with municipal boundaries to facilitate<br />

service delivery. A lot still needs to be done for well, proper and coordinated service delivery<br />

in our communities.<br />

More specifically, the key challenges are:<br />

· Uncertainty about the status of land ownership especially with reference to state and<br />

tribal land prohibits future development and investments.<br />

· Unresolved and competing land claims in the area threaten to destabilize future<br />

development.<br />

· Increasing number of Informal settlements and housing backlog as mining and<br />

agriculture activities intensify<br />

· Competing land uses (i.e. mining and agriculture, Commercial, etc.) may cause<br />

spatial, social, environmental and economic constraints in future.<br />

· Lack of environmental management<br />

· Communal land use management<br />

· Sprawled development<br />

· Lack of adequate water to supply all settlements<br />

· Some nodal points like Jane Furse have not yet been planned and proclaimed<br />

thereby limiting the growth potential of the node.<br />

3.3. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL<br />

TRANSFORMATION<br />

3.3.1. Powers and Funtions of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

• Water<br />

• Sanitation<br />

• Fire fighting<br />

• Local Tourism<br />

• Municipal Airport except for Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi<br />

• Municipal Planning<br />

• Municipal Health Services<br />

• Municipal Public Transport<br />

• Markets


116<br />

• Municipal Roads for Fetakgomo<br />

• Storm water for Tubatse, Makhuduthamaga and Fetakgomo<br />

• Cemeteries except for Ephraim Mogale and Elias Motsoaledi<br />

• Municipal Abattoirs<br />

• Refuse removal, refuse dumps and solid waste disposal for Fetakgomo<br />

3.3.2. Organizational Structure<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE: <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> -2015/2016<br />

The proposed organisational structure is made of 1122 posts from 1080 posts. There is an<br />

increase of 42 posts from 1080. There are 789 funded posts available. There are a total of<br />

342 vacant posts in the proposed organisational structure of which nine (9) are funded. The<br />

remaining 329 posts will be funded during the financial year <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> based on their<br />

strategic functioning and availability of funds. The remainder of the vacant post will be<br />

funded in the ensuing Integrated Development Plan cycle.<br />

The major focus of the proposed organizational structure is the strengthening of Budget and<br />

Treasury, Community Services and Infrastructure & Water Services. In Budget and Treasury<br />

the focus is mainly on billing. The intention of the municipality is to take over billing from local<br />

municipalities and general financial management with special attention to improving internal<br />

controls. In Community Services there are two issues that require attention, mainly<br />

compliance and capacity enhancement. A new division responsible for disaster management<br />

is proposed to ensure segregation of duties between disaster management and emergency<br />

services. In addition more staff is required in emergency services to address acute shortage<br />

of staff and address compliance issues.<br />

The provision of reliable water services depends on the capacity of infrastructure and water<br />

services. To ensure that requisite capacity is available, additional post of pump operators<br />

and plump operators are suggested. This number of pump operators will address the<br />

shortage of man power which is currently provided by volunteers.<br />

Furthermore the draft organisational structure suggests the relocation of Fleet and Facilities<br />

from Budget and Treasury to Corporate Services. In addition Payroll is suggested to be<br />

relocated from Corporate Services to Budget and Treasury.<br />

Below is the elaborate for additional posts per department:<br />

1. OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER<br />

There is no new position proposed.<br />

2. MUNICIPAL MANAGER `S OFFICE


117<br />

There are 3 new proposed posts:<br />

· The post of Manager is proposed to deal with organizational performance and<br />

performance of the Executive Management.<br />

· The post of Senior Internal Officer is proposed to deal with IT and regulatory audit.<br />

· The additional post of Internal Auditor is proposed to enhance the capacity of the<br />

internal audit unit to handle their functions accurately.<br />

3. OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR<br />

There are 16 new positions proposed:<br />

· The post of Manager is proposed to deal with customer care. The rationale for the<br />

proposal is that issues on query management have been elevated.<br />

· The post of Marketing Officer is proposed to handle the marketing functions which<br />

were previously located in the department of planning and Economic Development.<br />

· The position of Website Development is proposed to ensure that website is properly<br />

managed. The function of website administration was moved from corporate services<br />

office to the Executive Mayor’s Office.<br />

· The post of photographer is proposed to provide expertise in the production of<br />

newsletters.<br />

· The post of Communication Officer is abolished and replaced by the post of the<br />

Marketing Officer.<br />

· The post of the Head of Security is proposed to provide for the security details of the<br />

Executive Mayor.<br />

· The post of Policy and IGR is proposed to deal with the Policy and IGR conditions.<br />

These areas did not have a dictated unit to handle.<br />

· The additional nine posts of call centre operators are proposed to provide for 24 hour<br />

services in line with requirements of the function.<br />

· The new post of Call Centre Officer is proposed to control room.<br />

4. CORPORATE SERVICES<br />

There are 12 new post proposed:<br />

· The post of OD Officer is proposed to have the required capacity to deal with the job<br />

evaluation function. The process of evaluating jobs is quiet demanding and requires<br />

dedicated personnel. As the district we are going to handle job evaluation for all the<br />

five local municipalities.<br />

· The function of individual PMS is relocating from Corporate Services to Planning and<br />

Economic Development.<br />

· The additional post of Labour Relations Officer is proposed to complement the unit.<br />

Currently there are two Officers and there is an official seconded to help in the<br />

division.


118<br />

· The post of IT Technician is proposed to capacitate the division. There is a project to<br />

extend the IT Infrastructure to all the regional offices and depots and this will require<br />

additional hands.<br />

· The post of Training Officer is proposed to help in dealing with some of the neglected<br />

functions of training namely, assessment of the impact of training interventions.<br />

· The additional post of EAP Officer is proposed to increase the capacity of the Unit to<br />

assist dealing with the welfare of the employees. Currently there is one EAP Officer<br />

and she is not coping with the demands of the organization.<br />

· The post of OHS clerk is proposed to ensure that compliance with OHS is met.<br />

Currently there is no OHS Clerk who must attend to all OHS requirements in all the<br />

work stations.<br />

· The post of Senior Facility Officer, Fleet Officer, two Facility Clerks are proposed to<br />

augment the section. Furthermore two posts of general workers are proposed to help<br />

the handyman to deal with maintenance work.<br />

5. COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

There are 33 new post proposed:<br />

· The two posts of Disaster Officers are proposed to ensure that disaster management<br />

is undertaken in all the five (5) Local Municipalities.<br />

· The post of Principal is proposed to ensure that there is accountability on the part of<br />

the training academy.<br />

· The post of the Chief Fire Inspector is proposed to comply with the fire act and also<br />

to deal with the demands of the farming community and rapid industrialisation in the<br />

distinct.<br />

· The eight additional posts of Leading Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum<br />

shifts.<br />

· The eight additional posts of Senior Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum<br />

shifts.<br />

· The eight additional post of Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum shifts<br />

6. INFRASTRUCTURE AND WATER SERVICES<br />

There are 243 new proposed posts. The majority of the posts are pump operators<br />

and plant Operators. Special focus is also paid to enforcement of municipal<br />

regulations, thus a creation of a post to administer water authority issues.<br />

· The post of Deputy Director Water Authority is proposed, 2 Secretaries for<br />

administration of the two deputy directors.<br />

· The Division Regulation and Governance is proposed to be under the Water<br />

Authority Sub-department, 1Manager, 2Monitoring and Evaluation Officer,<br />

furthermore the division of Strategic Planning is suggested with newly created<br />

positions of 2 Technicians.<br />

· The PMU division proposed 1 Senior Project Manager and 1 Data Capturer.


119<br />

· The Water Provider sub-department under Bulk Operations division suggested 8<br />

positions that are dependent on section 78 process.<br />

· The Reticulation and Sanitation Division suggested 3 Artisan Plumbers, 3 General<br />

Worker and 5 Admin clerk for administration of the Regional offices.<br />

· The 167 new posts of pump operators are proposed to ensure that there is a reliable<br />

water provision. Currently the function is performed by volunteers and this proposal is<br />

aimed at dealing with issues of volunteers to create sustainability<br />

· The 46 new posts of plant operators are proposed to enhance the capacity of the<br />

municipality to provide continuous operation of water treatment works and<br />

wastewater treatment works.<br />

· The Scientific Services suggested 1 Lab Technician and 1 Lab Assistant<br />

· The Electro Mechanical Division suggested 1 Admin Clerk for administration<br />

purpose.<br />

7. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />

There are 3 proposed new positions:<br />

· There is a new division named <strong>IDP</strong> and PMS, therefore a Manager and 1 <strong>IDP</strong> Officer<br />

post are proposed. The migrating function of PMS from Corporate services will be<br />

performed in this division.<br />

· The post of LED officer is proposed to deal with tourism.<br />

8. BUDGET AND TREASURY<br />

There are 38 proposed new posts:<br />

· The two additional posts of Accountants are proposed, one Accountant will deal with<br />

AFS and reporting.<br />

· The additional post of billing clerk is proposed to provide an additional capacity<br />

· The two additional posts of Credit Control Clerk are proposed to increase capacity to<br />

cope with the demands<br />

· The post of Indigent Clerk is proposed to enhance the capacity became the port<br />

· The two additional post of Data Capturers are proposed to capture information from<br />

meter readers<br />

· The post of Chief Meter Reader is proposed to enhance capacity for implementation<br />

of water services, particularly billing.<br />

· The twenty new post of meter readers are proposed to ensure that the takeover of<br />

billing function from local municipalities is properly handled and also the extension of<br />

billing to new areas are explored.<br />

· The additional post of Cashier is proposed to increase capacity.<br />

· The new post of Accounting Clerk is proposed to deal with filing of all vat returns,<br />

reconciliations and invoice files and preparation of audit files for all account balances<br />

within the trial Balance.


120<br />

· The additional post of Senior Procurement Officer is proposed to deal with demand<br />

and performance Management.<br />

· The additional post of Asset Officer is proposed to assist with the reconciliation of<br />

stock counts and asset register.<br />

· The five new post of Stores Clerks are proposed to assist the regional Offices<br />

Below is the top structure of the district and the complete structure can be viewed in<br />

Annexure B


121<br />

COUNCIL<br />

EXECUTIVE MAYOR OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER OFFICE OF THE CHIEF WHIP


122<br />

OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER<br />

PURPOSE : To provide strategic administrative support to the council<br />

and ensure legislative compliant environment.<br />

FUNCTIONS:<br />

1.Monitor effectiveness of service delivery departments.<br />

1.1 Community services.<br />

1.2 Infrastructure and water services.<br />

1.3 Planning and economic development.<br />

2.Monitor effectiveness of support departments.<br />

2.1 Executive mayor's office<br />

2.2 Corporate services<br />

2.3 Budget and treasury<br />

1x Municipal Manager<br />

1x Chief Operations Officer<br />

1x Personal Assistant<br />

1x Secretary<br />

INTERNAL AUDIT<br />

Purpose: To provide an independant,<br />

objective assurance and consulting<br />

activity designed to add value and<br />

improve an organisation controls, risk<br />

management and governance processes.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Regularity audits.<br />

2. Performance audits.<br />

3.Information systems /IT audits.<br />

4.Investigation and adhok.<br />

1x Chief Audit Executive<br />

2x Senior Internal Auditor (1 new)<br />

4x Internal Auditor (1new)<br />

RISK MANAGEMENT<br />

Purpose: To manage the risk<br />

management function in line with<br />

corporate management strategy.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Risk assesment.<br />

2.Risk financing.<br />

3.Anti fraud & corruptions.<br />

4.Complaince management.<br />

5.Risk control.<br />

1x Chief Risk Officer<br />

2x Senior Risk Officer<br />

2x Risk Officer<br />

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT<br />

Purpose: To coordinate PMS for section<br />

56 employees.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Facilitate employment contracts and<br />

performance agreement.<br />

2.Coordinate quartely, mid year and<br />

annual reviews.<br />

3.Liase with sector departments for<br />

statutory reporting requirements.<br />

1x Manager (new)<br />

Executive<br />

Mayor's<br />

Office<br />

Corporate<br />

Services<br />

Community<br />

Services<br />

Infrastructure<br />

& Water<br />

Services<br />

Planning &<br />

Economic<br />

Development<br />

Budget &<br />

Treasury


1<strong>23</strong><br />

3.3.3. Human Resources Management (HRM)<br />

Introduction<br />

The role of the Human Resources Administration deals mainly with management of human<br />

resources. This refers to recruitment (talent attraction), staff retention, terminations, leave<br />

administration, payroll, implementation of Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, and human<br />

resource policy development and implementation.<br />

The function of Human Resource Administration is informed by the following statutory and<br />

legal framework:<br />

· Public Services Act, 1994<br />

· Employment Equity Act, 1998<br />

· Basic Conditions of Employment, 1997<br />

· Municipal Systems Act, 2000<br />

· Municipal Systems Amendment Act, 2011<br />

Status Quo<br />

Recruitment: currently all essential and critical posts at senior management level are filled<br />

e.g. Municipal Manager and Director of Infrastructure and Water Services. The main<br />

challenge facing the Division in recruitment is that appropriate candidates in certain rare<br />

skills are difficult to find in the market, especially during selection process (interviews).<br />

Staff retention/terminations: there are turnover/resignations in the SDM which is less than<br />

11%. The staff retention strategy needs to be implemented more effectively. The strategy<br />

cannot solve all the reasons for resignations, which means it is limited. However the strategy<br />

would be reviewed so that it becomes effective tool to deal with the challenges of the work<br />

environment. The turnover and absenteeism are used to monitor the quality of work life in<br />

the workplace.<br />

Leave administration: all types of leave administrations are currently running well. The<br />

systems used are ESS (electronic) and manual administration. Handicaps include<br />

managers/directors not approving leave requests on time. On average, the total work force<br />

takes less than 17% of leaves monthly. Hence the leave management is still controllable in<br />

the context of people management.<br />

Payroll: payroll is also running well on average. Some of the administrative challenges facing<br />

the Division includes: overtime and travel claims that reach payroll section very late and the<br />

understaffing in the Unit. However with regard to overtime and travel claims, a decision is<br />

taken than all claims should reach the Corporate Services Department on or before the 3 of<br />

every month as an internal control measure.


124<br />

Employment Equity: the Division successfully submits employment equity report annually on<br />

the first of October. Generally the area is running well because of 3 year cycle of<br />

Employment Equity Plan which will expire 30 June 20<strong>14</strong>. The implementation of EE targets<br />

are done together with the Department of Labour. The main challenge is to factor in women<br />

in top and senior management.<br />

Human resource policy development and implementation: currently being implemented well.<br />

However, challenges identified are dealt adequately in the Policy review which is currently<br />

unfolding.<br />

Challenges to be addressed by the HRA Unit<br />

- Shortage of competent personnel<br />

- Staff turnover<br />

- Non-compliance on leave administration<br />

- Payment of penalties from third parties<br />

- Non-compliance to employment Equity Plan<br />

- Non-compliance to HR policies<br />

3.3.4. Human Resources Development (HRD)<br />

Introduction<br />

The Human Resources Development division is comprised of a manager and two training<br />

officers.<br />

Status Quo: Human Resource Development<br />

The division manages issues relating to workplace skills planning and facilitates skills<br />

development for the community through a variety of interventions such as Internships and<br />

learnership. The division also manages the Bursary Scheme of the Council of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

Skills needs within the municipal council<br />

The inception of Local Government sphere has de-facto opened a life-long unnoticed<br />

challenge of capacity among the public service and municipal employees. The passing of the<br />

Skills Development Act no.97 of 1998 is aimed at capacitating the above mentioned<br />

employees through training in order to redress legacies of the past.<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> develops the Workplace Skills Plan annually in<br />

consultation with its employees and councillors to analyse the skills needs. This exercise is


125<br />

done in the form of a questionnaire that is distributed among the stakeholders. The following<br />

are the critical skills among the staff members:<br />

‣ Engineering<br />

‣ IT<br />

‣ Legal<br />

‣ Municipal Finance<br />

The councillors need capacity building in the fields that are much related to areas of<br />

oversight responsibility. Those areas or fields are the following:<br />

‣ Supply Chain Management<br />

‣ Executive Leadership Management<br />

‣ Human Resource Management in Local Government<br />

‣ Labour Relations<br />

‣ Project Management<br />

These needs are consolidated and form part of the WSP that should be approved by council.<br />

They are then submitted to LGSETA that will assist in training to address the scarce skills<br />

challenge.<br />

Challenges to be addressed by the Human Resource Development<br />

· Development of a credible workplace skills plan to guide training in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

· Development of a skills development programme for unemployed members of the<br />

community.<br />

In terms of the Systems Act of 2000 as amended sec 68 states that (1) a <strong>Municipality</strong> must<br />

develop its human resource capacity to a level that enables it to perform its functions and<br />

exercise its powers in an economical, effective, efficient and accountable way, and for this<br />

purpose must comply with the Skills Development Act, 1998 (Act No.81 of 1998), and Skills<br />

Development Levies Act (Act No. 28 of 1999).<br />

3.3.5. Employee Assistance Programme (EAP)<br />

Introduction<br />

The main purpose of EAP is to assist employees with personal and work related problems.<br />

The aim thereof is to enhance performance as well as production of employees. The focus is<br />

also on reactive and proactive wellness programs. Reactive wellness programs focuses on<br />

existing problems of employees. Proactive wellness programs are preventative programs<br />

that prevent problems from occurring in future.


126<br />

The main purpose of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) is to facilitate management of<br />

physical health of employees as affected by working conditions and to monitor municipal<br />

service areas. This will ensure that employees work in a healthy and safe environment.<br />

Status Quo<br />

Employee wellness<br />

Currently under the reactive program the Unit is focusing on the following:<br />

· Marital problems<br />

· Family conflicts<br />

· Bereavement support<br />

· Divorce<br />

· Stress<br />

· Depression<br />

· Mental Health<br />

· Substance abuse program. Measures include rehabilitation of employees and<br />

reintegration into family and workplace environment.<br />

· Financial wellness<br />

Currently under the proactive program the Unit is focusing on the following:<br />

• Stress and trauma management program (especially emergency workers). Measures<br />

such as debriefing and stress and trauma group counseling. Individual cases of nonemergency<br />

workers are also included.<br />

• Substance abuse program (include alcohol). Measures include awareness programs.<br />

• Wellness awareness programmes such as substance abuse, illnesses such as<br />

HIV/AIDS, TB, Cancer, etc. The awareness is conducted based on the statistics in<br />

the institution of certain illness, e.g. HIV/Aids.<br />

• Sports activities (bi-weekly)<br />

• Fun Walk (bi-monthly)<br />

• Wellness Day (exercising, HIV/AIDS testing, screening of illnesses etc.)<br />

Challenges facing the unit<br />

• Insufficient staff to work on EAP services<br />

• Inadequate Skills (Counseling skills)<br />

• Insufficient budget<br />

3.3.6. Occupational Health & Safety<br />

OHS deals with the identification and investigations of injuries on duty and facilitation of<br />

compensation, medical surveillance/checkups, buildings inspections and audit, risk<br />

assessment (planned task observations), provision of personal protective equipment as<br />

well as health and safety awareness programmes.


127<br />

Hiccups faced by the unit are lack of personnel and budget constraints.<br />

Challenges to be addressed by the EAP Unit<br />

· Performance and productive problems caused by personal and work related<br />

problems.<br />

· Unhealthy workforce<br />

· Unhealthy and unsafe work environment.<br />

3.3.7. Information and Communication Technology (ICT)<br />

Introduction<br />

The ICT Unit strives to be the back-bone and business driver of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> by providing and enhancing a virtual interactive organization where Information<br />

and Communication Technology are utilized to provide services to our communities.<br />

Status Quo<br />

JULY 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />

A) HARDWARE<br />

i) Out of 170 desktops eighty (80) desktops were identified as being redundant<br />

of which 16 were replaced during the 2 nd Quarter of 2012/<strong>2013</strong> financial year.<br />

ii) Out of 88 laptops 21 laptops were identified as being redundant of which 12<br />

were replaced during the 2 nd Quarter of the 2012/<strong>2013</strong> financial year.<br />

iii) Out of 6 file servers 2 file servers need to be replaced asap.<br />

B) SOFTWARE LICENSES<br />

i) Microsoft, MunAdmin, VIP, BCX, Collaborator and MunSoft licences are paid<br />

up to date.<br />

ii) License schedule was developed for 2012/<strong>2013</strong> and paid up to date by the<br />

end of the 2 nd Quarter.<br />

C) SYSTEM MAINTENANCE<br />

i) Seven (7) systems are monitored and maintained.<br />

ii) User account revision schedule is developed and in place. E-Venus & VIP<br />

User accounts were revised in June 2012 and are up for review in May <strong>2013</strong>.<br />

iii) System reports developed quarterly and service providers monitored.<br />

iv) Patch Management and Change Management Procedures developed and<br />

needs to be revised.<br />

D) SECURITY UPGRADE OF SERVER ROOMS


128<br />

i) Security gates were installed during 2 nd Quarter of 2012/<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

ii) Access registers are in place.<br />

iii) Air conditioners and environmental controls in the server rooms need to be<br />

fixed and/or upgraded.<br />

iv) Risk Management in process to acquire security cameras.<br />

E) TELEPHONE AND NETWORK INFRASTRUCURE<br />

i) VOIP network is in place in Groblersdal alone.<br />

ii) Of 29 sites there are only 9 sites included on the network (33% achievement).<br />

The project plan received from Telkom contains details of covering the 19<br />

Water Services depots and regional offices to provide to them access to all<br />

ICT systems the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is using.<br />

F) BUSINESS CONTINUITY<br />

i) Back-up Policy and Procedures in place but need to be revised and aligned to<br />

systems.<br />

ii) Back-ups are still done manually.<br />

iii) Monthly back-up reports, logs and registers in place.<br />

G) WIRELESS<br />

i) 90% of network is available at all times and downtimes kept under an hour.<br />

ii) Monthly and Quarterly reports are in place.<br />

iii) Network Monitoring Report Developed.<br />

iv) Voortrekker offices not included on the network.<br />

H) ICT AUDIT<br />

i) 64% of AG Queries attended to.<br />

ii) KPMG Audit Queries were responded to.<br />

I) RISK MANAGEMENT<br />

i) ICT Risk Register Revised and in place.<br />

J) ICT POLICY COMPLIANCE<br />

i) ICT Policy compliance report in place.<br />

K) ICT STEERING COMMITTEE<br />

i) ICT Steering Committee in place and 1 meeting already held in 2 nd Quarter.<br />

L) ICT SHARED SERVICES<br />

i) ICT Shared Services meeting scheduled to take place in 3 rd Quarter of<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong>.<br />

Challenges to be addressed by the ICT Unit


129<br />

1. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is a vast area and many residents still do not<br />

have access to basic ICT functions like e-mails and internet. To bridge the digital<br />

divide and empower the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Community, the ICT Unit needs to<br />

investigate and research on ways and means to improve this situation.<br />

2. There are a number of systems utilized for various reasons in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. Some of these systems do not fully integrate with each<br />

other which are either causing loopholes or duplication of efforts. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is therefore operating on a flat file system and systems are<br />

disintegrated.<br />

3. Various risks were identified by the Risk Unit i.e. Security Risks in the safe<br />

guarding of SDM information. These risks need to be revised and addressed as<br />

soon as possible.<br />

4. The ICT Unit received quite a number of both Internal and External Audit Queries<br />

which should be resolved to ensure proper ICT Governance is applied.<br />

5. The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> still didn’t adopt a proper ICT Framework.<br />

The ICT Framework will provide guidance for a 5 year ICT Strategy.<br />

6. The current ICT Disaster Recovery document is developed, but the infrastructure<br />

to execute the Plan is not in place. The back-ups are still being done manually<br />

and this process needs to be automated to increase reliability. Over and above<br />

that, the ICT Unit need to also secure the testing environment where back-ups,<br />

patches, upgrades and system changes can be tested before it is rolled out into<br />

the live environment.<br />

7. As stated in the Status Quo, there is quite a number of redundant hardware that<br />

needs to be replaced. Appointing a service provider for the provision and<br />

maintenance of hardware will speed up the turn-around time on ICT services.<br />

8. A proper ICT Strategy together with a proper Procurement Plan is needed to<br />

ensure that projects can be completed.<br />

9. The current staff compliment does not do justice to support the end users.<br />

Industry standards stipulate that 1 technician should serve 30 end users in a<br />

complex ICT environment and the ratio should be 1 to 50 in a normal/noncomplex<br />

environment.<br />

10. ICT expenditure is duplicated throughout the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

since each municipality is functioning on their own. Shared Services in the<br />

<strong>District</strong> needs to be revised with the proper guidance and support from<br />

COGHSTA.<br />

3.3.8. Auxiliary Services (AS)<br />

Introduction<br />

Auxiliary Services is one of the eight Corporate Services Department in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM); the main purpose of Auxiliary Services is ensure that safe storage of<br />

records, easy retrieval of records whenever the need arises, filing of records, archiving of


130<br />

information, record disposal, messenger services, and providing for photocopying and<br />

printing services.<br />

Status Quo<br />

The Current status of Registry Services Unit in SDM is that it is located at the Old Mutual<br />

Building with one store room at PIU and Budget & Treasury .Auxiliary services in SDM deals<br />

with the following. :<br />

• 4000Tender documents<br />

• 1050 Personnel files<br />

• 1500 Voucher files(Budget & Treasury)<br />

• 500 Documents are archived<br />

• 420 documents ready for disposal<br />

• Project Files in PIU<br />

• Approximately 2000 documents posted monthly through Frankling Machine<br />

The unit is also responsible for printing and photocopying, as well as providing messenger<br />

services.<br />

Some of the handicaps facing the Unit are:<br />

· Insufficient staff especially for messenger services<br />

· Insufficient office space to store records<br />

Challenges to be addressed by the AS Unit<br />

- Loss of records in the municipality<br />

- Irretraceable records<br />

- Need for production of hard-copies of documents for Councillors<br />

3.3.9. Legal Services<br />

Introduction<br />

The Legal Services Unit currently comprises of two Legal Officials responsible for Legal<br />

administration issues.<br />

Status Quo Legal Services Unit<br />

The division deals with litigation (17 court matters resolved), by-laws (two by laws has<br />

already been gazette) and legislative review updates 4 legislative review reports produced).<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> faces a large variety of legal issues. In order to cope with such issues, the<br />

institution has established a Panel of Attorneys for duration of two years which assists in<br />

effectively and efficiently resolving legal matters in order to resolve same. We have also a


131<br />

query register in place. The legal Services Unit also assists the institution with debt<br />

collection.<br />

Challenges to be addressed by the Legal Services Unit<br />

In terms of the Systems Act of 2000 as amended sec 75 states that a Municipal Council<br />

must adopt by-laws to effect to the implementation and enforcement of its tariff policy,<br />

subsection (2) of the same Act. By laws in terms of subsection (1) may differentiate between<br />

different categories of cases, debtors, service providers, service standards and geographical<br />

areas as long as such differentiation does not amount to unfair discrimination.<br />

The Legal Services Unit encounters challenges:<br />

· Procedure manual in place does not reflect the actual processes for performing the<br />

duties.<br />

· inadequate consultation by various departments ,consultation not done timeously<br />

within the institution which leads to unnecessary litigations and<br />

· verbal requests to attend to legal queries<br />

· No timeous notification on debt collection matters<br />

· Unavailability of records relating to debt collection<br />

· Internal departments not providing documentation proving that the public was<br />

consulted, which makes it difficult for the Legal Services Unit to provide documentary<br />

evidence to the MEC for Local Government and Housing in order to gazette same.<br />

3.3.10. Labour Relations<br />

Introduction<br />

Labour Relations Division is governed by different legislations i.e. Labour<br />

Relations Act 66 of 1995, South African Local Government Bargaining Council<br />

Main Collective Agreement, SDM Labour Relations Strategy approved by<br />

Council on 21 June 2012, Basic Conditions of Employment Act, Employment<br />

Equity Act etc.<br />

The role of Labour Relations Division is to ensure labour peace within the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

through Local Labour Forum and other forums and to investigate alleged misconduct and<br />

grievances.<br />

Status Quo<br />

Currently SDM has good relationship with organised labour. Local Labour Forum is in place.<br />

The forum has been established in terms of the Main Collective Agreement in order to deal<br />

with matters of mutual interest. LLF meets monthly and regular reports are sent to SALGA.<br />

<strong>District</strong> Labour Relations Practitioners Forum was established to address labour related


132<br />

challenges within the district. The forum meets bi monthly to deal with labour related issues.<br />

The Labour Relations Strategy approved by Council on 21 June 2012 and outlines how<br />

management and organised should engage going forward. The strategy gives rights to<br />

organised labour as per the legislations agreed upon in the SALGBC.<br />

Labour Relations Publication is issued quarterly to consciountize employees with current and<br />

burning issues in labour relation. Since 2009/2010 financial year 10 articles have been<br />

issued.<br />

Operational handicaps against the division are:<br />

· Shortage of skilled personnel<br />

· Managers reluctant to deal with labour related matters<br />

Challenges to be addressed by the Labour Relations Division<br />

• Industrial actions (Strikes)<br />

• Labour disputes<br />

• Employee Misconduct<br />

• Employee grievances<br />

Labour Relations Strategy<br />

The Labour Relations Strategy aims to maintain relationships between the<br />

employer and its employees. It deals with issues such as the following:<br />

• Discipline<br />

• Misconduct<br />

• Grievances<br />

• Collective bargaining<br />

• Strikes<br />

• Picketing<br />

• Management of labour relationship<br />

• Conflict resolution<br />

• Dispute Resolution<br />

3.3.11. Organizational Development (OD)<br />

Introduction<br />

The OD division exists in order to improve the organization’s empowerment, learning,<br />

problem solving processes through an on-going collaborative management of organizational<br />

culture, with special emphasis on the culture of the intact work teams and other team<br />

configurations utilizing consultant facilitator role, theory and technology of applied


133<br />

behavioural science including action research. In summary, the division deals with<br />

addressing transformation issues.<br />

Status Quo<br />

The organizational structure was approved by council in 2011/12 financial year. There were<br />

some major changes, the merging of the then Administration and Human Resources<br />

department to Corporate Services. The municipality has currently piloted the high level<br />

structure on the separation of powers between the executive and legislature. The placement<br />

committee and the Dispute Resolution were established to deal with confirmations and<br />

disputes concerning placement.<br />

74 positions were affected by placement, 4 had major changes and 89 employees were<br />

declared in excess but currently the number of excess employees is reduced to 43.The 4<br />

major challenges were issues of productivity and competency.<br />

Currently we are proposing for migration of fleet and facility function from Budget & Treasury<br />

to Corporate Services.<br />

The municipality was embarking on business process reengineering with the SP as a result it<br />

did not yield the desired results so the mayoral committee took the resolution to check<br />

whether the service can be terminated , currently the contract manager is busy trying to get<br />

the legal opinion regarding the matter.<br />

The OD Division is busy reviewing the organizational structure and business processes for<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> financial year equally we are going to design forms for efficiency and effectiveness<br />

of services.<br />

Challenges to be addressed by the OD Unit<br />

· Restructuring of the organization<br />

· Demotivated employees / no productivity.<br />

· No process chart for various functions are in place<br />

· Continuous diagnoses of respective departments<br />

· Unequal pay/rewards given to equal work<br />

3.3.12. Status Quo on High Level Delivery Areas in 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />

Key high level delivery<br />

areas<br />

Management of corporate<br />

services<br />

Detailed activities Status quo 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />

Management of human<br />

resource administration<br />

· Human resource<br />

administration and<br />

76 bursaries were awarded<br />

44 experiential learners<br />

accommodated


134<br />

benefits<br />

· Facilitate recruitment<br />

and selection<br />

· Coordinate policy<br />

development<br />

Manage organisational<br />

development<br />

· Process improvement<br />

· Organisational<br />

development services<br />

· Facilitate<br />

development of job<br />

descriptions<br />

· Conduct job<br />

evaluation<br />

Manage labour relations<br />

Manage auxiliary services<br />

· Render records<br />

management<br />

· Manage fleet and<br />

facilities<br />

Manage information and<br />

communication technology<br />

· Provide information<br />

and communication<br />

technology<br />

· Monitor performance<br />

of ICT infrastructure<br />

· Monitor network<br />

performance<br />

Manage human resource<br />

development<br />

· Compilation and<br />

implementation of<br />

Workplace Skills<br />

Development Plan<br />

· Coordinate training<br />

activities<br />

· Render human<br />

resource<br />

development<br />

Manage employee wellness<br />

services<br />

· Facilitate Employee<br />

36 interns accommodated<br />

46 learnership facilitated<br />

178 employees on<br />

Recognition of Prior Learning<br />

educational programme<br />

288 safety inspections and<br />

corrective measures<br />

undertaken<br />

66 safety awareness<br />

campaigns conducted<br />

28 employee wellness<br />

campaigns conducted<br />

50% of HR Plan<br />

implemented<br />

30 policies and procedures<br />

developed<br />

Employee retention strategy<br />

in place<br />

Employment Equity Plan in<br />

place<br />

64 ICT backups done<br />

7 ICT maintenance reviews<br />

done<br />

9 sites included in the ICT<br />

network<br />

100% of legal cases<br />

attended<br />

4 legislative review updates<br />

done<br />

File plan in place<br />

920 files archived<br />

10% of personnel files<br />

audited and updated


135<br />

Performance management<br />

Assistance<br />

Programmes<br />

· Effective and efficient<br />

management of<br />

workplace hazards<br />

Manage legal services<br />

· Provide legal advice<br />

to council and<br />

administration<br />

· Provide executive<br />

support<br />

Performance Planning<br />

· SDBIP (Service<br />

Delivery and budget<br />

implementation plan)<br />

· Employment<br />

contracts and<br />

Performance<br />

agreements<br />

Performance Implementation<br />

· Section 56 updates to<br />

COGHSTA<br />

· Revised SDBIP<br />

Monthly reporting<br />

· Performance<br />

management forums<br />

Performance <strong>Review</strong><br />

· Annual report<br />

· Monthly, quarterly<br />

and annual<br />

performance reports<br />

· Performance<br />

Lekgotla<br />

· Performance<br />

Appraisals<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> SDBIP developed<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> Employment<br />

contracts for all section 56<br />

Managers and performance<br />

agreements concluded<br />

Monthly section 56 updates<br />

to COGHSTA done<br />

Performance Monthly<br />

reporting for <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>2013</strong> done<br />

Annual report for 2011/2012<br />

compiled and submitted to<br />

council<br />

Performance Lekgotla for all<br />

four quarters conducted<br />

Performance appraisals for<br />

2011/2012 done


136<br />

3.4. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

Introduction<br />

The information on analysis of basic service delivery was taken from variety of<br />

sources including: Statistics SA, communities within the SDM (through<br />

community consultation), internal departmental inputs, and other spheres of<br />

government.<br />

3.4.1. Water<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is both a Water Service Authority (WSA) and Water Service<br />

Provider (WSP). Its 605 villages are supplied with water from 43 schemes and sub-schemes.<br />

Water scarcity is an issue of major concern in the district; however, ordinary residence often<br />

feels these stresses particularly acutely during low rainfall.<br />

The delivery of water in the <strong>District</strong> remains a challenge; however, in the first five years of<br />

the SDM’s existence. The total number of households without access to clean water has<br />

dropped from 35, 9% o 17, and 5%. The overall reduction in the number of households<br />

receiving water below prescribed minimum standard is 42%. The number of households who<br />

receive water at minimum standards of service and above has increased by an impressive<br />

52.3%. There are 4% of those who pay rent particularly in Urban Households.<br />

The tables below outlines the water services situation found in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households,<br />

schools and clinics. The image generated is that the <strong>District</strong> experiences more below RDP<br />

standards services than they do above RDP standards services.<br />

The <strong>District</strong> is faced with a mammoth responsibility of providing water and sanitation to many<br />

villages that depended on boreholes and rivers for the past years. Many of these boreholes<br />

have dried up while river water is not good for human consumption.<br />

Status Quo<br />

Table 28: Domestic water services with infrastructure at or above RDP levels<br />

SDM EPHMLM EMLM MLM FLM GTM<br />

Total Number of hh <strong>23</strong>3067.59 28857 52936 58991 20731 61552<br />

(Dec. ’08)<br />

Total number of hh <strong>14</strong>9902.00 26677 31260 29663 18035 44267<br />

served<br />

Percentage HH 67% 92% 59% 50% 87% 71%<br />

Served


137<br />

Source: Technical Services SDM<br />

The situation is no less bleak for schools and clinics within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. This obviously has<br />

significant repercussions in social terms, and may lead to an unnecessary number of<br />

illnesses in school children. There are still schools in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (31%) that receive below<br />

RDP standards water services as can be seen in the table below.<br />

Table 29: Water Services in Schools<br />

Above RDP Below RDP Total Schools % Above RDP % Below RDP<br />

402 335 737 55% 45%<br />

Source: SDM/DWAE Nis<br />

Similarly, all of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> registered clinics receive services above RDP standards as<br />

confirmed with DWAE.<br />

Table 30: Water Services in Clinics<br />

Above RDP Below RDP Total Schools % Above RDP % Below RDP<br />

24 41 65 37% 63%<br />

Source: SDM/DWAE Nis<br />

Table 31: <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Households that pay for water<br />

Percentage<br />

No, free from government 56,2<br />

Yes, for usage 18,1<br />

No, but not free from Government <strong>14</strong>,1<br />

Yes, household pays a fixed monthly amount 7,5<br />

Do not know 4<br />

Total 100<br />

Source: DoA and FIVIMS (2007a) – Poor quality dwellings can help to identify pockets of food insecurities<br />

In addition to domestic water consumption, the mining and agricultural sectors also consume<br />

substantial amount of water in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />

<strong>District</strong> Initiatives<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has prepared a Water Services Development Plan (WSDP) that<br />

was adopted in 2005 and updated annually. The WSDP is currently being implemented and<br />

will be reviewed on yearly basis. The <strong>District</strong> has also finalized its section 78 process and is<br />

presently implementing the outcomes of that exercise. The establishment of Water Service<br />

Department and the transfer of DWAE staff to the <strong>District</strong> have been completed.<br />

The raising of Flag Boshielo Dam by five meters has been completed by DWAE. Funds have<br />

been allocated to construct a new dam (De Hoop Dam) to increase the <strong>District</strong>’s capacity to<br />

provide water to its communities. These two dams will improve the state of water provision in


138<br />

the <strong>District</strong> and these will eventually tourism and other development opportunities in the<br />

area.<br />

The <strong>District</strong> has developed a Community Water Supplies Master Plan. This enables the<br />

<strong>District</strong> and its implementing agents to achieve its WSDP objectives. The intention is also to<br />

investigate alternative technical options for supplying specific areas with water, and to<br />

ensure coordination and implementation of water supply infrastructure. Early findings of<br />

these studies reveal that groundwater is a major water resource for most <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

households – and will continue to do so in the future. 92% of households in Tubatse, 87% in<br />

Fetakgomo and 16% in Ephraim Mogale are solely reliant on groundwater. The following<br />

water sources are found in SDM:<br />

· Ground water<br />

· Wells<br />

· Rivers<br />

· Pools<br />

· Dams e.g. Flag Boshielo, etc.<br />

Free Basic Water<br />

Most <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households can be defined as poor indigent-where the total income is<br />

below R1, 500 per month. At present, approximately 79% of the households in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

fall into this category. These are the households to which Free Basic Water (FBW) must be<br />

supplied and to whom the Equitable Share subsidy applies.<br />

Water Backlog<br />

Table 32: Water Backlog A<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Households Backlog % Backlog<br />

Fetakgomo 29 570 16 263 56%<br />

Ephraim Mogale 32 304 16 576 62%<br />

Greater Tubatse 66 611 13 759 43%<br />

Makhuduthamaga 56 642 32 899 64%<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 52 263 25 586 64%<br />

Total / <strong>District</strong> <strong>23</strong>7 390 105 083 57%<br />

Source: STATS SA – 2007 Community Survey<br />

There is a slight difference between the STATSSA information on water backlog above and<br />

the WSDP information in Table 54 below. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the Water<br />

Services authority to contact a verification process to test the accuracy of the information.<br />

The huge backlog indicated above shows it is unlikely that the SDM will meet the national<br />

targets.<br />

Table 33: Water Backlog B


139<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Households Backlog % Backlog<br />

Fetakgomo 29 570 <strong>14</strong> 190 56%<br />

Ephraim Mogale 32 304 1<strong>14</strong>74 62%<br />

Greater Tubatse 66 611 21 529 43%<br />

Makhuduthamaga 56 642 32 899 64%<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 52 263 22494 64%<br />

Total / <strong>District</strong> <strong>23</strong>7 390 102 586 57%<br />

Source: SDM (2009) – Water Services Development Plan<br />

Access to piped water<br />

At least 25% of the households in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> do not have access to<br />

piped water which represents 65 530 households. 75% of the households in the district do<br />

have access to piped water in the yard or through communal tap which represents 198 272<br />

households in the district. The majority of households who do not have access to piped<br />

water are found in Elias Motsoaledi and Greater Tubatse as well as Makhuduthamaga. This<br />

means that the municipality must progressively focus delivery of water infrastructure in the<br />

three municipalities where possible.<br />

Table 34: Access to piped water<br />

Access to piped water inside<br />

dwelling/yard<br />

Access to piped water on<br />

communal stand<br />

No access to piped water<br />

1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />

Ephraim Mogale 7 909 9 980 22 759 4 257 6 063 4 343 7 385 8 <strong>14</strong>6 5 181<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 10 510 12 562 28 295 13 205 <strong>14</strong> 176 11 901 18 449 18 741 20 056<br />

Makhuduthamaga 8 081 5 701 20 817 <strong>14</strong> 0<strong>23</strong> 18 510 26 984 27 400 28 767 17 416<br />

Fetakgomo 2 193 2 362 8 154 8 336 8 700 12 059 6 722 7 822 2 638<br />

Greater Tubatse 5 073 9 176 25 847 17 639 24 188 37 113 19 389 20 393 20 <strong>23</strong>9<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 33 766 39 779 105 872 57 460 71 636 92 400 79 345 83 870 65 530<br />

Source: Census (2011)


<strong>14</strong>0<br />

SDM WARD COMMITTEES <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Figure 22: Water supply energy source<br />

Energy source water supply<br />

It appears from the figure above that there are many villages that are using electric motors<br />

as energy source for water supply (375 villages). Most of the villages are found in<br />

Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (117); followed by Greater Tubatse (109); Elias<br />

Motsoaledi (64); Fetakgomo (45) and Ephraim Mogale (40).<br />

There are also villages that are still using Diesel Engines as the energy source of water<br />

supply. The highest number is recorded in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (69);<br />

Makhuduthamaga (32); Fetakgomo (19); Elias Motsoaledi (19); and finally Ephraim Mogale<br />

(3).<br />

This means there are 375 electric motors compared to 136 diesel engines in the district as<br />

indicated. The Implication is that with regard to operations and maintenance programme,<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should make provision for more spare parts to service<br />

electric motors whilst stabilising in areas where there are diesel engines. There is a therefore<br />

a need to gradually move towards providing more electric motors as a long term strategy.<br />

Many villages no longer prefer diesel engines as it is difficult to maintain.<br />

Figure <strong>23</strong>: Frequency of water supply by village


<strong>14</strong>1<br />

SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

At least 41% (86) of the villages in the district reported that there is no water supply in their<br />

area and are found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. This is followed by 29% (61) of<br />

the villages that are located in Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 15 %( 32) in<br />

Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 11 %( 22) in Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> and finally<br />

4% (9) are found in Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. These villages recorded that there is<br />

no water supply at all in their areas making it a total of 210 villages.<br />

415 villages reported that although there was water supply, it was irregular. This implies that<br />

water was available in certain periods and sometimes once or three times a week. 112<br />

villages in Makhuduthamaga and similarly (112) in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

reported that the water supply was sporadic.<br />

It can be observed that within the district as a whole, only 127 villages reported that the<br />

water supply was regular. 43 villages are found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 40<br />

villages in Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 21 villages in Elias Motsoaledi Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>; 17 in Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> and finally 6 villages in Fetakgomo<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

It appears that 542 villages are being supplied with piped water although only 127 (17%) are<br />

satisfied with the supply compared to 415 (55%) that recorded water supply as irregularly<br />

supplied and 210 (28%) with no supply at all. In total 72% of the villages in the district<br />

municipality are being provided with piped water (542 villages).<br />

The implications is that the district municipality needs to deal with the areas where there is<br />

no supply at all but also focus on making sure that there is regularity of supply in areas<br />

where the supply is sporadic.


<strong>14</strong>2<br />

The includes but not limited to assessing the causes of problems where supply is sporadic<br />

and making sure that there is extension and roll out of water supply in areas where there is<br />

lack of supply.<br />

Figure 24: Pump operator availability by village<br />

SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

At least 366 (61%) of the villages in the district recorded that they have pump operators for<br />

operation of water sources (diesel engines and/or electric motors). <strong>23</strong>1 (39%) villages<br />

indicated that they do not have pump operators. Most respondents indicated that the nature<br />

of the pump operators varies; there are those that have been employed by the district and<br />

those that are volunteering in the communities. The highest numbers of pump operators are<br />

found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (129); followed by Makhuduthamaga Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> (117); Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (51); Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

(39); and Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (30).<br />

The implication is that the municipality must rationalise the pump operators by verifying<br />

those that are still on the municipal payroll and those that are volunteering. It will be best to<br />

also map the location of these operators with the clear intention of consolidating villages on<br />

a linear location so that instead of allocating one operator per machine, there could be one<br />

operator being responsible for multiple villages.<br />

It is also questionable whether the municipality is deriving value for money out of the these<br />

operators if one compares the number of available operators as opposed to regularity of<br />

water supply in the villages.<br />

Figure 25: Source of water supply by village


<strong>14</strong>3<br />

SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Most of the villages within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> derive their water from Municipal<br />

system as a source. There are <strong>23</strong>9 villages within the entire district that use the municipal<br />

system. 59 villages are found in Makhuduthamaga; Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 58;<br />

Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 50; Fetakgomo 44 and finally 28 in Greater Tubatse<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

It is quite astonishing that Greater Tubatse <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest number of villages<br />

that still relies on boreholes as water source. <strong>14</strong>0 villages were recorded in Greater Tubatse<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong> as those that still rely on boreholes. Only 18 villages in the district were<br />

recorded as using water tankers for water supply. 155 villages indicated that they still make<br />

use of the river as source of water. These villages are mostly found in Greater Tubatse Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> (47) and Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (48) followed by Fetakgomo Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> (28); Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (26) and Ephraim Mogale Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> (6).<br />

In general 336 (43%) of the villages still rely on boreholes; <strong>23</strong>9 (31%) rely on the municipal<br />

system; 155 (20%) make use of the river; 18 (2%) relies on water tankers and remainder<br />

35(4%) make use of other methods. This is the case in an area in Praktiseer where they<br />

indicated that there is no water supply and they cross the road to the nearest settlement to<br />

fetch water. Others rely on water vendors as reliable water supply.<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> must put in place processes to ensure that reliance on<br />

boreholes is reduced as the area is very dry. There is also a need to drastically reduce water<br />

tankers not only because they are costly but for a mere fact that the water quality is<br />

minimised by transportation.


<strong>14</strong>4<br />

Figure 26: Standard of water supply by village<br />

SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

The majority of villages within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> derive their water from<br />

communal water systems. 139 villages are found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 113<br />

in Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 72 in Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong>; 56 in Elias<br />

Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> with the remainder (24) in Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

In total 404 villages derive their water from communal water systems.<br />

The data indicates that 132 villages within the district obtain water from yard connections.<br />

These households have the highest level of service compared to the rest. The majority of<br />

villages are found in Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (37); followed by Elias Motsoaledi<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (34); Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (26); Greater Tubatse Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> (25) and finally Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (10).<br />

224 households indicated that they obtain their water from other systems other than yard<br />

and communal water systems. This could include but no limited to the following; water<br />

vendors, river and water tankers.<br />

The implication is that many villagers in the district still travel long distances in order to<br />

obtain water. There is a need to intensify a programme of yard connections. Secondly, the<br />

district must take advantage of the areas where there are yard connections for<br />

implementation of cost recovery.<br />

Challenges<br />

· No source in other areas<br />

· Budgetary constraints<br />

· Some of the boreholes are contaminated<br />

· The stealing of both electric and diesel engine pumps<br />

· Breakdown of machines, illegal connections and extensions of settlements.


<strong>14</strong>5<br />

3.4.2. Sanitation<br />

Introduction<br />

The provision of sanitation in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> also faces considerable challenges at present.<br />

The situation is more of a concern that it was the cases with water. Only 22% of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

households receive above RDP standards sanitation services. The sanitation backlog is<br />

primarily within the rural villages, comprising 78% of households without adequate<br />

sanitation. The SDM will not be able to meet the national targets are stipulated by MDG.<br />

The SDM has different households that use different types of toilet facilities. Almost all towns<br />

in the <strong>District</strong> use flushing toilets while in the rural areas there are few households that use<br />

flushing toilets. The rest of the population in the rural areas of the <strong>District</strong> use pit latrines.<br />

Status Quo<br />

Table 35: Breakdown of Sanitation Backlog per Local <strong>Municipality</strong> A<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong> Households Backlog<br />

Fetakgomo 29 570 11 768<br />

Greater Ephraim Mogale 32 304 16 576<br />

Greater Tubatse 66 611 25 798<br />

Makhuduthamaga 56 642 38 034<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 52 263 31 763<br />

Total (<strong>District</strong>) <strong>23</strong>7 390 1<strong>23</strong> 939<br />

Source: STATS SA – 2007 Community Survey<br />

There is a slight difference between the STATSSA information on sanitation backlog above<br />

and the WSDP information below. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the Water Services<br />

Authority to contact a verification process to test the accuracy of the information.<br />

Table 36: Breakdown of sanitation backlog per local municipality B<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong> Household Backlog<br />

Fetakgomo 29 570 25 895<br />

Ephraim Mogale 32 304 29 169<br />

Greater Tubatse 66 611 65 690<br />

Makhuduthamaga 56 642 51271<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 52 263 38 922<br />

Total (<strong>District</strong>) <strong>23</strong>7 390 211 797<br />

Source: SDM WSDP<br />

In addition, a slight majority of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> schools (53%) receive RDP standard sanitation<br />

services, which is a better picture than that for households.


<strong>14</strong>6<br />

Table 37: School Sanitation<br />

Above RDP Below RDP Total Clinics % Above RDP % Below RDP<br />

698 39 737 95% 5%<br />

Source: SDM (2005) Water Services Development Plan<br />

The situation is not the same for clinics in the area, however, with as much as 63% receiving<br />

below RDP Standards services.<br />

Table 38: Clinic Sanitation<br />

Above RDP Below RDP Total Clinics % Above RDP % Below RDP<br />

24 41 65 37% 63%<br />

Source: SDM (2005) Water Services Development Plan<br />

Type of sanitation<br />

Access to sanitation remains a challenge in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. In 2011,<br />

22 687 households have access to either flush/chemical toilet system. Majority of these<br />

households are located in Greater Tubatse and Elias Motsoaledi. Greater Tubatse local<br />

municipality still scores higher in terms of the number of households that do not have access<br />

to toilets standing at 5 661. Pit toilets are still the main source of sanitation in the district.<br />

Measures need to be taken in order to reduce the number of pit toilets as they may lead to<br />

ground water pollution whilst many households are relying on it for daily consumption.<br />

Table 39: Sanitation Type<br />

MUNICIPALITY Flush/chemical toilets Pit toilets Bucket No toilets<br />

1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 200<br />

1<br />

201<br />

1<br />

1996 2001 2011<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Makhuduthama<br />

ga<br />

1 708 3 758 4 067 15 789 17 162 25 328 151 121 611 1 892 3 <strong>14</strong>7 1 677<br />

2 883 3 786 7 792 36 377 38 802 47 632 274 375 460 2 672 2 516 2 680<br />

1 274 2 176 3 009 38 532 41 918 58 561 188 372 224 9 545 8 512 2 552<br />

Fetakgomo 102 724 794 10 505 13 111 20 827 85 106 55 9 545 8 512 2 552<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

1 585 4 262 7 026 26 559 35 203 67 872 182 339 1<br />

259<br />

13 825 13 952 5 661<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 7 552 <strong>14</strong><br />

706<br />

22<br />

687<br />

127 762 <strong>14</strong>6<br />

196<br />

220<br />

221<br />

881 1<br />

313<br />

2<br />

609<br />

34 528 33 070 13 510<br />

Source: Census 2011<br />

Figure 27: Type of sanitation by village


<strong>14</strong>7<br />

SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

The graph above illustrates that at least 75% (592) of the villages in the district are still using<br />

pit latrines as the sanitation system. The highest number has been recorded in Greater<br />

Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (184); followed by Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (159);<br />

Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (122); Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (84) and lastly<br />

Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (43). This is also compared to 9% (70) of the villages that<br />

are using Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines (VIP’s).<br />

Only 2% (17) of the villages/suburbs are making use of sewer borne sanitation systems. This<br />

is mainly in the urban areas of the district such as existing towns and townships. Greater<br />

Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has recorded the highest number of villages/suburbs that are<br />

using sewer (7); followed by Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (5); Ephraim Mogale Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> (4); Makhuduthamaga (1). Only Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is the only one<br />

that does not have a settlement that is using sewer system. Finally, <strong>14</strong>% (110) villages<br />

indicated that they are using other forms of sanitations which have not been indicated.<br />

This ranges from villages that still rely on bushes for sanitation and those that rely on their<br />

neighbours for assistance.<br />

The implications from the above are that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> needs to develop<br />

and implement a programme that will improve sanitation access throughout the entire<br />

district.<br />

There is also a need to develop standards regarding sanitation supply in the district in line<br />

with required standards. More work needs to be done to ensure that households in the<br />

district gravitate from Pit Latrines towards safer sanitation options even if it is not sewer<br />

borne sanitation. There are varieties of technologies that are available to deal with sanitation<br />

challenges.


<strong>14</strong>8<br />

Figure 28: Sanitation programme implemented by government by village<br />

SDM Ward Committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

The chart above indicates that 84% (613) of the villages recorded that there was no<br />

sanitation programme implemented in their area by government or other state organ. Only<br />

16% (116) of the villages indicated that there was some sanitation programme implemented<br />

by government. Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest number of villages that<br />

still require sanitation intervention (199); followed by Makhuduthamaga (153); Elias<br />

Motsoaledi (132); Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (76) and finally Ephraim Mogale Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> (53).<br />

Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> benefitted immensely from government sanitation<br />

programmes where 31 villages were recorded; followed by Fetakgomo (<strong>23</strong>); Elias Motsoaledi<br />

and Makhuduthamaga (22) and finally Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (18).<br />

The implications from the above findings are that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should<br />

develop a comprehensive programme to deal with access to sanitation in the district. It is<br />

also important to explore sanitation measures especially for the rural areas in the district.<br />

Challenges:<br />

· Budgetary constraints<br />

· Mountain area<br />

3.4.3. Refuse removal<br />

Waste removal is being provided in urban centres like Marble Hall, Groblersdal and<br />

Burgersfort. Permitted landfill sites are Marble Hall, Burgersfort, Jane Furse and recently<br />

(Malogeng and Mphanama) in Fetakgomo. The waste disposal and collection has just


<strong>14</strong>9<br />

started in some parts of Makhuduthamaga. There are some villages that conduct their own<br />

illegal dumping sites which could be a potential environmental and health hazard.<br />

In many municipalities in South Africa, refuse removal is seen as a trading service. That is,<br />

municipalities provide this service and only recover the cost of providing the service without<br />

any profit. The rural nature of the district makes it impossible for the roll out of the sewer<br />

borne sanitation notwithstanding the fact that most of the rural households are currently not<br />

paying for municipal services. In 2011, <strong>23</strong> 213 households have access to refuse removal<br />

that is undertaken by local authorities. The majority of these households are found in Greater<br />

Tubatse, followed by Elias Motsoaledi and Fetakgomo. Makhuduthamaga has the least<br />

number of households that are receiving refuse removal service.<br />

The strategy implication is that for refuse removal work, it must be provided in tandem with<br />

other services like water, sanitation and electricity so that an individual household is billed for<br />

the entire services provision.<br />

Table 40: Access to Refuse Removal<br />

Removed by local<br />

authority/private company<br />

Communal refuse<br />

No rubbish disposal<br />

1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />

Ephraim Mogale 2 184 3 173 3 726 15 490 17 311 <strong>23</strong> 829 1 663 3 706 4 356<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 4 136 3 448 6 527 31 805 34 003 44 517 5 765 8 027 8 504<br />

Makhuduthamaga 3 073 463 1 639 39 3<strong>23</strong> 46 992 58 636 6 572 5 5<strong>23</strong> 4 631<br />

Fetakgomo 154 428 4 216 12 133 <strong>14</strong> 621 16 417 4 801 3 835 2 121<br />

Greater Tubatse 743 3 946 7 105 26 576 35 241 60 892 <strong>14</strong> 384 <strong>14</strong> 569 <strong>14</strong> 794<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 10 290 11 458 <strong>23</strong> 213 125 328 <strong>14</strong>8 167 204 290 33 185 35 660 34 406<br />

Source: Census 2011<br />

Figure29: Refuse removal according to villages


150<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Most of the areas in the district are still rural in nature. 94% (694) of the villages recorded<br />

that they are not receiving refuse removal services from the municipality. This compares to<br />

6% (42) of the villages/suburbs that recorded that they are receiving refuse removal from the<br />

municipality. Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest number of villages that recorded<br />

that they are receiving municipal refuse removal service (22) followed by Elias Motsoaledi<br />

(8); Greater Tubatse (7); Ephraim Mogale (3) and Makhuduthamaga (2).<br />

3.4.4. Electricity<br />

Introduction<br />

Currently, Eskom provides electricity in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Area. Even though Eskom is the<br />

main provider of electricity, the <strong>District</strong> and the Local Municipalities do sometimes implement<br />

electrification projects to assist in reducing backlogs. Ephraim Mogale <strong>Municipality</strong> provides<br />

electricity for its Marble Hall Town while Elias Motsoaledi provides electricity to both<br />

Groblersdal Town and Roosenekal. Fetakgomo, Makhuduthamaga and Greater Tubatse<br />

Local Municipalities are not licensed to supply electricity.<br />

The electrification backlog is currently estimated at 37 124 households. Given the current<br />

electricity capacity challenges and lack of resources, it is unlikely that these backlogs will be<br />

eliminated in time to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) and national targets for<br />

electricity in 20<strong>14</strong>.<br />

Table 41: Electricity backlog per municipality<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Backlogs (Household)<br />

Fetakgomo 1 937<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 5 349


151<br />

Ephraim Mogale 3 357<br />

Makhuduthamaga 6 266<br />

Greater Tubatse 20 215<br />

SDM 37 124<br />

Source: Census 2011<br />

Free Basic Electricity<br />

Most <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households can be defined as poor indigent-where the total income is<br />

below R1, 500 per month. At present, approximately 79% of the households in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

fall into this category. These are the households to which Free Basic Electricity (FBE) must<br />

be supplied and to whom the Equitable Share subsidy applies.<br />

Table 42: Households receiving free electricity in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Free Basic Electricity %<br />

Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 1039 4.503<br />

Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 2886 12.507<br />

Ephraim Mogale <strong>Municipality</strong> <strong>23</strong>90 10.358<br />

Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 8503 36.849<br />

Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 8257 35.783<br />

Total <strong>23</strong>075 100<br />

Source: DoA and FIVIMS (2007a)<br />

The provision of electricity in most of the rural villages has assisted many households to use<br />

it for lighting. Statistics has shown that Ephraim Mogale <strong>Municipality</strong> has been provided with<br />

lightning in almost all its rural villages. There is still a need to provide electricity for lighting in<br />

other municipalities like Fetakgomo, Makhuduthamaga, Tubatse and Elias Motsoaledi.<br />

Larger percentages of villages in the rural areas do not use energy for cooking. They still<br />

depend on the collection of fire wood for cooking. Smaller percentage of people use energy<br />

for cooking. It is only in towns where almost all people use energy for cooking. Perhaps, 0,<br />

1% of people use coal for cooking if there are such people. There are also few people who<br />

use other sources of energy for cooking like gas.<br />

Fire wood remains a dominant energy source used in rural villages for heating. It should also<br />

be indicated that even in towns, fire wood is used by some for heating. Smaller percentage<br />

of people in towns uses electricity for heating.<br />

Energy for lighting, heating and cooking<br />

Access to electricity has tremendously improved from 1996 compared to 2011. 226 677<br />

households in the district have access to electricity which represents 86% of the total<br />

households in the district. Only <strong>14</strong>% of the households in the district do not have access to<br />

electricity representing 37 124 households. Notwithstanding the above, there are settlements


152<br />

that have grown which will also require post electrification connections. Greater Tubatse and<br />

Makhuduthamaga municipalities have the highest number of households that still require<br />

electrification. Out of these households that require electrification, 69 Villages are in Greater<br />

Tubatse and 32 in Elias Motsoaledi.<br />

Table 43: Energy for lighting, heating and cooking<br />

Lighting Cooking Heating<br />

1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />

Ephraim Mogale 10 697 19 938 28 927 4 511 6 381 15 086 4 219 8 455 13 341<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 29 505 38 906 54 902 10 495 10 398 37 830 9 624 11 402 30 433<br />

Makhuduthamaga 12 368 32 884 58 951 5 058 8 967 32 293 4 615 8 951 <strong>23</strong> 716<br />

Fetakgomo 2 630 7 373 20 9<strong>14</strong> 1 562 3 344 13 202 1 454 3 101 11 033<br />

Greater Tubatse 8 750 25 072 62 984 3 677 8 688 45 374 3 537 9 057 32 689<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 63 950 124 173 226 677 25 303 37 778 <strong>14</strong>3 786 <strong>23</strong> 449 40 966 111 212<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

Figure 30: Electricity supply<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

The above chart illustrates that 84% (601) of the villages do have access to electricity<br />

compared to 16% (1<strong>14</strong>) that do not have access. The majority of the villages that do not<br />

have access to electricity are found in Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (69); Elias<br />

Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (32); Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (6); Makhuduthamaga<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (5) and finally Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (2).


153<br />

Figure 31: Electricity post connections<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

It appears that 77% (533) villages recorded that they require electricity post connections<br />

compared to <strong>23</strong>% (155) which recorded that there are no post connections needed. Greater<br />

Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest number of post connections required (154<br />

villages) followed by Makhuduthamaga (<strong>14</strong>8 villages); Elias Motsoaledi (93); Fetakgomo (89)<br />

and Ephraim Mogale (49).<br />

It appears that many villages in the district do have access to electricity. There is a need to<br />

engage with Eskom on the remainder of the villages that still require electricity connections.<br />

There has also been an expansion of existing settlements which has given rise to the<br />

increased need for post connections. Therefore the district has to consolidate information for<br />

new connections and post connections for presentation to Eskom.<br />

Challenges:<br />

· Authority over electricity<br />

· Eskom has no capacity<br />

· Illegal connections<br />

· New extensions of residential sites for post connectors<br />

· Budgetary constrains<br />

3.4.5. Cemeteries


154<br />

Figure 32: Access to cemeteries<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Most of the villages in the district do have access to cemeteries. 78% (530) villages/suburbs<br />

recorded that they have access to cemeteries compared to 22% (152) villages/suburbs that<br />

recorded that they have no access to cemeteries. Some of the explanations given are that<br />

some villages will bury their dead in other villages where cemeteries are available.<br />

The Majority of villages where there is absence of cemeteries are found in Greater Tubatse<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (68) followed by Elias Motsoaledi (46); Makhuduthamaga (19); Ephraim<br />

Mogale (10) and Fetakgomo (9).<br />

3.4.6. Housing<br />

Introduction<br />

The government has made significant strides towards progressively fulfilling its constitutional<br />

obligation of ensuring that every South African has access to permanent housing that<br />

provides secure tenure, privacy, protection from the elements, and access to basic services.<br />

The national housing programme is not just about building houses but also about<br />

transforming our cities and towns and building cohesive and non-racial communities. In<br />

order to contribute to the end of apartheid spatial arrangements, government will roll out<br />

housing programme closer to places of work and amenities.


155<br />

The government must continue to increase access to secure and decent housing for all<br />

through its newly adopted “Breaking New Ground” Strategy. Most <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> houses are<br />

currently cement or brick homes.<br />

Status Quo<br />

The table below provides an overview of the types of dwelling found in the area.<br />

Table 44: Typology of houses in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Building Materials<br />

Percentage of Households<br />

Cement block and concrete walls 63.6<br />

Brick walls 19.1<br />

Mud 7.3<br />

Mud and Cement 4.8<br />

Corrugated iron/zinc 4.7<br />

Corrugated iron/zinc roofs 95.1<br />

Tiled roofs 3<br />

Roofs – other material 1.9<br />

Source: DoA and FIVIMS (2007 a). Poor quality dwellings can help to identify pockets of food insecurity<br />

The vast majority of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households state that they are their own and have fully<br />

paid off their own dwellings (DoA and FIVIMS, 2007a). The different dwelling types found in<br />

the area are set out in the table below.<br />

Table 45: Dwelling types as a % of Households<br />

Types of Dwelling<br />

EMLM (%) Fetakgo Makhudut Ephraim Tubats<br />

mo LM hamaga Mogale e (%)<br />

(%) LM (%) LM (%)<br />

House or brick structure on a 73.4 79.1 75.2 73.3 69.6<br />

separate stand or yard<br />

Traditional dwelling/hut 15.2 <strong>14</strong>.3 16.6 15.8 18.4<br />

Flat/Town<br />

house/cluster 1.8 0.4 0.8 1.7 1.1<br />

house/semi-detached<br />

House/flat/room in backyard 2.4 1.0 2.2 3.2 1.0<br />

Informal dwelling/shack/backyard 5.2 4.1 44.5 4.9 8.9<br />

shack<br />

Other 1.9 1.1 0.6 1.1 1.0<br />

Source: Adapted from Census 2001 data, reproduced in SEI (2006). Adapting to climate, water and health<br />

stressors: insights from <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>, South Africa<br />

As is evident from the table above, most houses in the area are formalized structures on<br />

separate stands. There are also a reasonable number of traditional huts in the area. On<br />

average, these traditional dwellings make up roughly 15% of households in the <strong>District</strong>. The


156<br />

largest number of informal and shack dwellings are found in Makhuduthamaga, probably<br />

because of the presence of the major urban conurbation, Jane Furse, in that municipality.<br />

Table 46: Housing Backlog<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Backlog<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 5 010<br />

Fetakgomo 3 484<br />

Tubatse 1 112<br />

Ephraim Mogale 8 195<br />

Makhuduthamaga 13 250<br />

SDM 30 813<br />

Source: <strong>Municipality</strong> <strong>IDP</strong> Housing Chapter Jan 09<br />

The provision of new housing is still a challenge not only in the district but the whole<br />

Limpopo province. The Multi Year Housing Plan developed by the Department of Local<br />

Government and Housing (DLGH) has identified challenges which are being faced by the<br />

department and municipalities’, resulting in poor delivery of houses to beneficiaries.<br />

This plan is aimed at addressing some of the identified key challenges which hamper<br />

housing delivery. The department carries the responsibility of providing housing in the<br />

province whereas municipalities are responsible for compiling housing waiting lists. In<br />

2006/07, a total number of 2450 units were planned to be constructed within the district.<br />

The following table indicates housing projects for the entire district since 2003:<br />

Table 47: Housing projects in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong> Financial Year<br />

2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2010/11<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 300 - 400 500 200 500<br />

Fetakgomo 300 100 350 - 300 300<br />

Makhuduthamaga - 200 600 - 300 350<br />

Ephraim Mogale - - 100 - 100 700<br />

Tubatse 200 - 1000 - 300 900<br />

Totals 800 300 2 450 500 1 200 2 750<br />

Source: Draft Limpopo Multi –year Provincial Housing Development plan (2007)<br />

Most projects implemented over the years mentioned in the above table were never<br />

completed by developers. However, the department of Local Government and Housing is<br />

addressing blocked projects to meet NHBRC standards. The department is liaising with the<br />

local municipalities within the district regarding progress and issues relating to blocked.<br />

According to the information acquired from the DLGH, there are a total number of 4207<br />

blocked RDP housing in the district and 1787 of them are in the process of being unblocked.


157<br />

Figure 33: Government Housing Programme (RDP Housing)<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Since 1994, there has been progress regarding low cost housing delivery in the villages<br />

although not all have been reached so far. 521 villages indicated that there has been<br />

housing delivery in their area compared to 182 that recorded that they have not seen any<br />

low cost housing delivery in their area. The district municipality and its locals must work with<br />

the Provincial Housing Department to deal with housing demand issues as well as directing<br />

housing delivery in line with sustainable human settlements practices.<br />

Challenges<br />

· Untraceable beneficiaries<br />

· Beneficiaries whose livelihood has improved<br />

· Beneficiaries who are not aware that they have benefited because wrong people<br />

have unlawfully benefited on their behalf<br />

· Provision of houses to the needy households<br />

· Eradication of blocked housing projects in municipalities.


158<br />

3.4.7. Telecommunication<br />

Telephone facility remains a challenge in the SDM’s vicinity. It is commendable that many<br />

villages in the <strong>District</strong> have access to the use of telephone and cell phones but there are<br />

these other villages where there is totally no reception for both telephones and cell phones.<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> population experiences a clear cut from the international communities due to<br />

lack of Information Communication Technology (ICT). The State of the Province report that<br />

was presented in 2005 has shown that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> was still lagging behind in comparative<br />

terms with the other <strong>District</strong>s in the province. The population fails to take the advantage of<br />

the ever-expanding internet and e-mail telecommunication facilities especially for<br />

educational and business opportunities. This is potentially an important pathway to economic<br />

growth in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

In addition, there are still villages in the <strong>District</strong> that cannot get proper signals for radios and<br />

televisions because of their geographic location. This is especially true of the mountainous<br />

villages like Tswereng. Mahlabeng, Rostok, Mooihoek, India, Ga-Makopa, Pelangwe,<br />

Phahlamanoge, Tjate, Kgautswane, etc.<br />

Figure 34: Telecommunication<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

At least 355 villages recorded that the quality of cell phone reception is bad compared to 333<br />

villages that said the reception is good. 388 villages recorded that their Television reception<br />

is bad compared to 329 that recorded that the TV reception is good. 381 villages further<br />

recorded that their Radio reception is good compared to 337 that indicated that it is bad.


159<br />

Elias Motsoaledi has the highest number of villages where cell phone reception is bad (94)<br />

followed by Greater Tubatse (80); Fetakgomo (68); Makhuduthamaga (69) and Ephraim<br />

Mogale (44).<br />

Greater Tubatse has the highest number of villages where TV reception is described as bad<br />

(105) followed by Elias Motsoaledi (95); Makhuduthamaga (85); Fetakgomo (63) and<br />

Ephraim Mogale (40 villages)<br />

The district municipality and its locals must develop strategies that will lead to improved<br />

coverage of telecommunication in the villages. This will be achieved if stakeholders such as<br />

SABC and Cell phone Service Providers are brought on board.<br />

3.4.8. Roads and Stormwater<br />

The development of the road and transport network in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is of vital importance<br />

given the planned economic trajectory of the <strong>District</strong>, as well as the potential offered by<br />

Dilokong Corridor. In general, the district is well connected to its surrounding areas to the<br />

East, West and South. However, geographic factors had hindered connectivity impeded road<br />

construction there. There is, in fact a stretch of approximately 150km between<br />

Lebowakgomo and the R36 through the JG Strijdom tunnel without tarred road access<br />

northwards.<br />

Within the <strong>District</strong> itself, there is a general lack of roads – and of tarred roads in particularly –<br />

connecting the inner section of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, which consists largely of scattered villages with<br />

minimum economic activity at present. The <strong>District</strong> has decided however, not to encourage<br />

continued scattered development at present – and future transport routes will therefore be<br />

concentrated along the major nodes of economic activity. It is hoped that this will encourage<br />

workers from the rural areas to urban areas – a philosophy in line with the NSDP principles.<br />

In contrast to the inner section of the <strong>District</strong>, the semi-urban areas of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> are<br />

relatively well-serviced by the Provincial and National routes running through it. These<br />

routes, as will be seen later in this section, are supporting the area’s main economic<br />

activities reasonably well at present. What remains to be seen, however, is whether the<br />

planned platinum mining expansion in the area will be adequately served by current<br />

infrastructure in the <strong>District</strong>. Roads and stormwater drainage is estimated at 30 727.<br />

There are number of stormwater structures on the road network under ownership of SDM<br />

and are summarized as follows:<br />

Table 48: Number of the structures on the road network under ownership of SDM<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong> No. of No. of major No. of minor<br />

bridges culverts culverts<br />

No.<br />

Drifts<br />

of


160<br />

Fetakgomo 2 7 75 15<br />

Ephraim Mogale 1 13 <strong>14</strong>8 0<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 4 13 212 0<br />

Makhuduthamaga 4 15 247 7<br />

Tubatse 13 31 247 29<br />

Total 24 79 929 51<br />

Source: Road Master Plan: 2006<br />

There is currently no Stormwater drainage Structure Master Plan at the <strong>District</strong> level. The<br />

<strong>District</strong> needs to develop the Stormwater Master Plan in the Fetakgomo <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

The Road Network in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

According to the powers and functions, the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is responsible for the<br />

development of roads only in Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has<br />

one major national road within it (the N11), as well as several provincial arterial routes<br />

including the R25, R33, R36, R37, R555, R573 and R579. There are also a limited number<br />

of tarred minor roads, such as those leading into Jane Furse. The remainders of the roads in<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, however, are largely gravel roads that serve to connect the rural areas within<br />

the <strong>District</strong>. The total length of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Roads network under the <strong>District</strong>’s control is<br />

at 1,491 km. The following table summarizes the situation as per municipality.<br />

Table 49: Road network in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (<strong>District</strong> Roads)<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong> Length (km) % of Network<br />

Fetakgomo 188 13<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 2<strong>23</strong> 15<br />

Ephraim Mogale <strong>23</strong>6 16<br />

Greater Tubatse 392 26<br />

Makhuduthamaga 452 30<br />

Total <strong>14</strong>91 100<br />

Source: SDM (undated) Road Master Plan: Draft<br />

The current backlog is as follows:<br />

· Upgrading of 71.89 kilometers from unpaved to paved for Fetakgomo municipal<br />

roads.<br />

· Upgrading of 187 kilometers of <strong>District</strong> roads from unpaved to paved<br />

· Re-gravelling of 1.22 kilometers of <strong>District</strong> Roads.<br />

The above-mentioned backlogs clearly indicate that a substantial amount of money is<br />

required over a period of time to redress the situation.<br />

The railway network


161<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> district has three railway lines, originally developed to serve mining activity<br />

in the area. These are:<br />

· The railway line entering <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> in the south next to Stoffburg, which continues<br />

northwards for 30kms (it leads to an abandoned mine near the Mapochs mine).<br />

· The line entering <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> in the west near Nutfield, which continues eastwards<br />

to Marble Hall.<br />

· The line entering <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> in the east, passes near Ohrigstad and Burgersfort<br />

(past abandoned mine) and ends near Steelpoort (near the Tubatse Mine).<br />

It became obvious that these lines, originally developed to serve past mining and agricultural<br />

activities in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, have not been re-routed to serve new (or future) mines in the area.<br />

If this continues, the results will be that mining expansion in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> will place additional<br />

burden on the road network in the area. Beyond commercial usage, a commuter rail link<br />

between Pretoria and south-west part if <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (along the Moloto Road) will clearly be<br />

useful, given the high levels of male migrancy.<br />

Limpopo’s Development Corridors and <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Roads<br />

The LGDP identified four development corridors, which will drive future economic<br />

development in the province. Of these, the Dilokong and Phalaborwa Corridors travel<br />

through the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> and are of immediate economic relevance for the area.<br />

The Dilokong Corridor includes three important roads that fall within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area.<br />

These are:<br />

· Polokwane to Burgersfort (P33/1 and P33/2 via Mafefe<br />

· Flag Boshielo Dam through Lebowakgomo and Mafefe, linking the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> with the Phalaborwa and Kruger National Park.<br />

· Chuenespoort via Boyne to Mankweng<br />

· The Phalaborwa Corridor connects Hazyview (Mpumalanga) with Phalaborwa and<br />

Tzaneen through a number of small towns on the western side of the Kruger National<br />

Park. It includes two roads sections that fall within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area.<br />

· Route section P17/3-5, D726, P112/1-3, P43/2, D1308 and P54/1.<br />

· Road section P<strong>14</strong>6/1 from Klaserie to Blyde River, P116/1 from Hoedspruit to<br />

Ohrigstad via the Strijdom Tunnel and P181/1 from the Oaks to Burgersfort.<br />

The district will look carefully into the prioritization of these roads, given their economic<br />

significance in both <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> and the province more generally.<br />

Implications for future Economic growth in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>


162<br />

The road network in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is clearly in need of some maintenance in the future. This<br />

will became especially important given the planned economic growth of the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Figure 35: Gravel and Tarred Roads<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

It has been established that 92% of the local access roads are gravel (657 roads) compared<br />

to 8% (56 roads) that are tarred. The highest number of local access gravel roads is found in<br />

Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (201 roads) followed by Makhuduthamaga Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> (171 roads); Elias Motsoaledi (134 roads); Fetakgomo (88 roads) and Ephraim<br />

Mogale (63 roads). All these roads are local access roads.<br />

The district municipality and its locals must work collaboratively to establish the extent of<br />

these roads (kilometres) and development of strategies to ensure maintenance of these<br />

roads. Most communities prefer tarring as solutions however other methods need to be<br />

explored.<br />

Challenges<br />

· Grading of internal access roads (streets)<br />

· Construction of bridges<br />

· The tarring of roads<br />

· Provincial arterial roads are deteriorating rapidly because of a lack of maintenance<br />

· Local access roads are gravel, below standard and used mainly by buses and taxis<br />

· Local gravel roads also need stormwater management<br />

3.4.9. Waste Management<br />

Introduction


163<br />

Waste Management forms an important part of basic service delivery in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

Status Quo<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has developed the Integrated Waste Management<br />

Plan (IWMP) that needs to be adopted by council. Waste removal is being provided in urban<br />

centres like Marble Hall, Groblersdal and Burgersfort. These municipal areas have organized<br />

waste collection systems. Permitted landfill sites are in Marble Hall, Jane Furse and recently<br />

(Malogeng and Mphanama) in Fetakgomo. The Jane Furse pilot landfill site is now operating<br />

according to permit requirements as per legislation.<br />

The waste disposal collection has just started in some parts of Makhuduthamaga and<br />

Fetakgomo. The landfill site in Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has already reached capacity. The<br />

SDM has developed plans to assist Tubatse in securing a new landfill site license. A process<br />

to conduct Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) and the facilitation of permitting the landfill<br />

site at Elias Motsoaledi has been initiated. Rosennekal landfill site at Elias Motsoaledi is<br />

issued with the permit. The <strong>District</strong> is also establishing a waste transfer station at Hlogotlou<br />

Township in Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

Refuse removal processes do not cover most villages in all Local Municipalities. The backlog<br />

for refuse removal is estimated at 162 041. This poses serious health risk, especially when<br />

accompanied by minimal access to clean water. These areas are therefore fairly susceptible<br />

to the outbreak of diseases and other environmental conditions.<br />

The informal disposal of waste in the <strong>District</strong> is a source of concern, as it causes<br />

environmental pollution and hazards. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> residents also need to be more aware of<br />

sound waste management practices. For the municipalities themselves, the key challenge is<br />

to maintain existing disposal sites and to provide new sites and to provide in areas that lack<br />

them. Local Municipalities should make budgets available and follow their Integrated Waste<br />

Management Plans in their possession for the waste development infrastructure.<br />

Challenges<br />

· Refuse removal do not cover most villages<br />

· Minimal access to clean water<br />

· Informal disposal of waste<br />

· One of the landfill sites has reached capacity<br />

· Maintenance of the existing landfill sites.<br />

· Budgeting for waste management at some Local Municipalities<br />

· Awareness of our communities on good waste management practices


164<br />

3.4.10. Environmental Management<br />

Introduction<br />

Across the globe, environmental stresses and major changes in climate conditions are<br />

influencing the lives and livelihoods of ordinary people ad communities everywhere. This is<br />

no less true of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>. The recent draught in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, for instance, is<br />

widely regarded as the result of the much publicized El Niño and La Niña phenomena<br />

(Ziervogel et al, 2006).<br />

The increasingly important role that climate plays in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area has recently been<br />

highlighted in some few studies. What is becoming even more evident is that rainfalls<br />

patterns in the <strong>District</strong> are highly variable – a situation that tends to disrupt a wide range of<br />

socio–economic activities in the area such as rain-fed crop production, often with very little<br />

warning. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has in fact been significantly affected by both El Niño and La Niña<br />

events in recent years. This has affected the amounts of rainfall received in the area. El Niño<br />

tends to be associated with below average rainfall, whilst La Niña often incurs above<br />

average rainfall.<br />

Status Quo<br />

Geology<br />

The regional geology consists of the Eastern Bushveld and Springbok flats region. The<br />

overall geology of the area is classified as follows:<br />

- Gabbro (South of the R37)<br />

- Anorte band (adjacent to the R37)<br />

- Clinopyroxenite (to the North of R37)<br />

- Arenite (adjacent to the Olifants River)<br />

The Springbok flats coal fields are found on the Western side of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />

The Transvaal Supergroup is found in Ephraim Mogale towards the east of the <strong>District</strong>, as<br />

well as in an arc inscribed by the Northern Drakensburg in the Far East. The stones and<br />

rocks found within the Transvaal Supergroup include dolomite, limestone, iron-formation,<br />

shale and quartzite, amongst other (Goode, 2006).<br />

As previous sections have highlighted, the unique geology of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has bequeathed<br />

the <strong>District</strong> with the largest reserves of platinum group metals in the world. The renowned<br />

Bushveld Complex is found at the centres of the region. The western portion contains acidic<br />

rocks, whilst the Eastern site has basic rocks which contain metal minerals. It is the latter<br />

that is of economic significance. The Merensky Reef is found within this Complex, and<br />

contains major deposits of the platinum group metal, nickel, copper and cobalt.


165<br />

Topography<br />

The Oliphant River is located on an open flood plain area. A valley surrounded by the nonperennial<br />

rivers is found to the north of the river. Strips of erosion can be found in the valley<br />

alongside most of the perennial rivers. Wood is still one of the main sources of energy for<br />

households, which leads to deforestation and subsequent erosion because of the denuding<br />

vegetation. The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> does not have Environmental Management<br />

Inspectors to help educate the communities about conservation of the land, fauna and flora<br />

for the future. One of the major environmental problems in the area is inappropriate<br />

agricultural methods, which leads to overgrazing and even desertification in places like<br />

Thabanaseshu. Overgrazing is also the result of too many livestock units per area of land.<br />

We also have a problem of pesticide poisoning in the farming areas along the Olifants River<br />

due to aerial and other forms of crop spraying of which also affects communities alongside<br />

the river and neighboring villages. This issue of pesticides can't, be ruled out that it also<br />

contributes to water pollution down the rivers and streams if mismanaged.<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Climate<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area is characterized by a hot climate in the Olifans River Valley. The<br />

average temperature shows moderate fluctuation with average summer temperatures of<br />

<strong>23</strong>˚C as well as a maximum of 28˚C and a minimum of 18˚C. In winter, the average is 13.5˚C<br />

with the maximum of 20˚C and a minimum of 7˚C (as measured at the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Weather<br />

Station).<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is located in the Summer Rainfall Zone of the country, and receives more than<br />

80% of its rainfall between November and March. The Southern parts of the area receives<br />

more rain (between 600mm – 800mm annually), whilst the Northern parts receives only<br />

500mm – 600mm by comparison. This limits the type of agricultural activity that can take<br />

place in the north.<br />

The mean annual participation as measured at the Zebediela Weather station from 1949-<br />

2001 was 51mm. most of the precipitation occurs between October and March, with the<br />

highest average monthly rainfall during January (100,84mm) and the lowest during <strong>July</strong><br />

(2,89mm). Thunderstorms, with the associated low soil penetration and high level of erosion,<br />

are common in the area. It would also appear as if El Noño and La Niña phenomena<br />

significantly influence the amounts of rainfall received in the area (Ziervogel et al, 2006).<br />

There is considerable variability in terms of rainfall intensity, duration and frequency. This<br />

exacerbates the water shortage problem, which is a key developmental constraint in the<br />

<strong>District</strong>. Increasingly sparse rainfall, as well as a high evaporation rate, is also currently<br />

limiting subsistence farming in the <strong>District</strong> – a situation that has contributed food insecurity<br />

mentioned earlier in this <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />

Water Scarcity


166<br />

Water scarcity is a huge developmental challenge within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>, and<br />

constrains both economic and social activity in the area. The issue is a manifestation of<br />

climate variability. However, it is also the result of a number of other factors, which include<br />

insufficient and variable rainfall, inequitable water resource management and the absence of<br />

drinking water, bulk water and irrigation infrastructure that would aid the distribution of water<br />

to rural villages (SEI, 2006).<br />

Water scarcity affects a range of other developmental issues in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> – Municipal<br />

service delivery, subsistence farming activities, commercial agriculture and the expansion of<br />

the mining sector. Its implications for development are mentioned throughout this <strong>IDP</strong>, and it<br />

is a key constraint for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Challenges<br />

- The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> is currently subject to enormous variations in rainfall, which<br />

affect crop production and sustainable livelihoods.<br />

More specifically, the key challenges are:<br />

• Rainfall patterns in the district are highly variable, disrupting agricultural production<br />

and causing related socio-economic stresses.<br />

• Because of its climatic profile, the <strong>District</strong> is currently susceptible to all kinds of and<br />

phenomena variations in climate just like the whole world as is affected by climate<br />

which exacerbates the water shortage problem that is already a key developmental<br />

constraint in the area.<br />

• There is also drought, overgrazing and soil erosion in most parts of the district<br />

including deforestation of our land.<br />

• There is a serious need to control pesticide poisoning and other forms of chemical<br />

pollutions.<br />

• The district also has a challenge of air pollution from the industrialised and mining<br />

areas that warrants urgent attention in terms of resources.<br />

• Environmental Health is another field that if left unattended, negative accumulative<br />

effects will be a problem to deal with in the near future.<br />

3.4.11. Sports, Arts and Culture<br />

Introduction<br />

Sport, Arts and Culture play an important role in the physical, psychological, social, technical<br />

and tactical development of young and matured people. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

plays an advocacy role/ function whereby most of the programmes are driven by the<br />

provincial department of Sport, Arts and Culture.<br />

Status Quo


167<br />

Our communities participate in various sport, arts and culture projects that are meant to<br />

promote a healthy lifestyle in the society. They understand the benefits of sport, arts and<br />

culture. There has recently been an integration of sport, arts and culture programmes in<br />

schools and community sport supported by the district. Some of the supported programmes<br />

include capacity-building for managers, coaches and umpires/referees of the regional teams.<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Satellite Academy of Sport has been established and provided with equipment<br />

worth R500 000 from Lottery to support sport development programmes. The performance<br />

squad of all the codes will be subjected to capacity-building programmes in preparations for<br />

the Provincial games.<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> and its local municipalities provide a measure of<br />

professional and financial support to youths ,the primary aim being to identify, nurture and<br />

promote talent in terms of athletes, artists, crafters and designers.<br />

Challenges<br />

· Poor maintenance of existing sport, arts and culture facilities.<br />

· Under-funding of sport, arts and culture development programmes.<br />

· Insufficient professional support for sport, arts and culture programme by local<br />

municipalities.<br />

· Inadequate capacity-building programmes<br />

· Lack of professional facilities within the local municipalities.<br />

· Lack of personnel at <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Satellite Academy of Sport (Maleoskop)<br />

· Lack of Arts and Culture Centres<br />

3.4.12. Health<br />

Introduction<br />

South Africa huge health care resources compared with many middle-income countries, yet<br />

the bulk of these resources are in the private sector and serve a minority of the population<br />

thereby undermining the country’s ability to produce quality care and improve healthcare<br />

outcomes. Many of the public facilities, especially hospitals and clinics need to be revitalized.<br />

National government should expand on progress made in upgrading facilities in many public<br />

hospitals and clinics as part of a physical infrastructure programme. The government is<br />

determined to end the huge inequalities that exist in the public and private sectors by making<br />

sure that these sectors work together.<br />

As promulgated in the Constitution, Schedule 4 part A, health services is a functional area of<br />

National and Provincial legislative competence. In terms of section 155 (6) (a) the Provincial<br />

government must provide for the monitoring and support of local government in the<br />

Province, albeit can be assigned to a municipality in terms of Section 156 of Constitution.


168<br />

The government has identified the following priorities that must inform a major improvement<br />

in the health care system:<br />

• Increasing bursaries of the health care professionals, including increasing the<br />

employment of community health workers, which will be linked to the improvement of<br />

the district health system.<br />

• Improving working conditions and the provision of decent wages for health workers.<br />

• Reduce the impact of HIV/AIDS on individuals, families, communities and society by<br />

expanding access to appropriate treatment, care and support.<br />

• Strengthen the fight against AIDS through collaboration with partners at all levels of<br />

society and accelerate implementation of the HIV and AIDS and STI plans.<br />

• Strengthen the formal partnership against AIDS at all levels of our society including<br />

the strengthening the South African National AIDS Council (SANAC).<br />

• Improve quality of health services and physical infrastructure revitalization.<br />

Health services are critical in nurturing human development and tend to have important<br />

economic spin-offs as well. Countries that have invested significantly in primary health care<br />

(PHC), in particular, generally produce a healthier, and therefore more productive,<br />

workforce. There is also significant international evidence to illustrate that early investments<br />

in PHC result in less strain on the health budget (and, consequently, on social spending) in<br />

later years. This is an important debate for municipalities which are now largely responsible<br />

for PHC in South Africa.<br />

Status Quo<br />

Within Limpopo province, the provision of health facilities is generally inadequate in<br />

comparison with other provinces. More specifically, access to health facilities within<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> itself is fairly poor. On average, there is 1 clinic for every<br />

17,000 people within the district and approximately 97,500 people per hospital.<br />

Table 50: Number of health facilities in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Clinics 76<br />

Community Health Centres 6<br />

Mobile services 21<br />

<strong>District</strong> hospitals 5<br />

Regional hospital 2<br />

Provincial tertiary 0<br />

Public sector facilities and beds (2005)


169<br />

Central hospitals 0<br />

Specialised hospitals 0<br />

Private hospitals -<br />

Beds 1,386<br />

Source: Barron, P et al (2006). The <strong>District</strong> Health Barometer: 2005/06.<br />

Accessibility of health services<br />

Clinics and hospitals are evenly distributed throughout the <strong>District</strong>, but accessibility remains<br />

difficult because of poor roads, inadequate transportation and so forth.<br />

Table 51: Access to hospitals<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Percentage within 20km radius to hospital<br />

Fetakgomo 40%<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 80%<br />

Makhuduthamaga 80%<br />

Ephraim Mogale 40%<br />

Tubatse 78%<br />

The residents of Fetakgomo, Elias Motsoaledi, Makhuduthamaga and Tubatse all have<br />

relatively easy access to hospitals in the district. This is not the case for Ephraim Mogale.<br />

These differences may be attributed to the relative population density of each of the area;<br />

however, the table below indicates the access that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> residents have to clinics and<br />

health professionals.<br />

Table 52: Access to clinics and professionals<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Percentage within 5km radius to clinics<br />

Fetakgomo 51%<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 64%<br />

Makhuduthamaga 48%<br />

Ephraim Mogale 47%<br />

Tubatse 45%


170<br />

According to these figures, Elias Motsoaledi enjoys the greatest access (64%), whilst<br />

Tubatse residents have access to clinics and health professionals (45%). The number of<br />

health professionals currently working in the district is not optimal, however. As the table<br />

below indicates, there is a shortage of professionals working in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> health facilities<br />

at the moment.<br />

Table 53: Availability of professional staff in clinics and hospitals<br />

Personal category Number Employed Number per 1000 people<br />

Medical Officers 32 0,02<br />

Professional nurses 492 0,34<br />

Pharmacists 6 0,00<br />

Staff Nurses 297 0,20<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s Health Performance<br />

According to the independently-published <strong>District</strong> Health Barometer² (P Barron et al, 2006),<br />

the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has the lowest per capita expenditure on primary health care (PHC)<br />

in South Africa at just R115 per person.<br />

The table below outlines key health indicators for the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>. The second last<br />

column (district ranking in South Africa) is particularly revealing because it shows how<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> ranks in terms of the other district/metros in the country. In this column, a score<br />

of 1 means it is the best performer in the country, whilst a rating 53 rd means that it is the<br />

worst.<br />

Table 54: Ranking <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s performance in SA: Key health indicators<br />

Indicator<br />

Inputs into the health system<br />

Expressed<br />

as:<br />

2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 DM ranking National<br />

in SA (I53) Value<br />

Amt spent on non-hospital ZAR 115 53 rd <strong>23</strong>2<br />

PHC health services per<br />

person<br />

Proportion of district health % 3,3 5,0<br />

services expenditure on<br />

management


171<br />

Proportion of district health % 61,8 45,0<br />

services expenditure on<br />

management<br />

Process<br />

Nurse clinical workload<br />

Patients<br />

seen/day<br />

8,7 15,1 13,1 31,6<br />

Average length of stay Days 4,4 3,6 3,8 27 th 4,3<br />

Bed utilization rate % 52,9 56,9 65,5 30 th 63,9<br />

Outputs of health system<br />

Govt. distribution of condoms No of 5,1 5,5 7,9 24 th 8,8<br />

at PHC facilities<br />

condoms<br />

distributed<br />

per male<br />

p.a.<br />

% of children (under 1yr) who % 68,2 74,0 88,9 28 th 90,3<br />

complete their primary course<br />

of immunization<br />

% of children who dropped out % 7,2 8,1 3,5 19 th 4,7<br />

b/w the 1 st and 3 rd dose of DTP<br />

vaccine<br />

% of deliveries carried out by % 8,8 9,5 10,3 18,4<br />

Caesarean section<br />

Proportion of ANC clients % 15,4 24,0 42,7 33 rd -<br />

tested for HIV<br />

HIV prevalence among ANC % 12,7 11,8 13,9 11 th -<br />

clients tested<br />

Nevirapine uptake rate among % 50,1 54,9 68,6 7 th 51,7<br />

newborn babies of HIV +<br />

women (%)<br />

Health outcomes<br />

PHC utilization rate Visits to 1,5 1,5 1,5 49 th 2,1<br />

PHC<br />

facilities per<br />

person p.a.


172<br />

Incidence of sexually transited No. of new 3,4 3,2 3,1 15 th 4,8<br />

infections treated – new episodes of<br />

STIs treated<br />

TB cure rate % 49,1 54,8 29 th 50,8<br />

(2004<br />

TB smear conversion rate % 53,7 40,1 45 th 50,5<br />

Diarrhea incidence under 5 yrs. New 115,0 <strong>14</strong>9,4 222,2 25 th 257,7<br />

cases/100 0<br />

children<br />

Not gaining weight under 5 yrs. % 2,1 2,1 2,0 35 th 1,4<br />

rate<br />

Delivery rate in facility % 72,4 101,0 104,2 4 th 81,1<br />

Eventual impact<br />

Stillbirth rate No of 32,2 26,2 26,3 31 st 24,8<br />

stillbirths/<br />

1000 births<br />

Perinatal mortality rate in No of 49,4 152,9 39,3 36 th 34,5<br />

facility<br />

stillbirths +<br />

deaths in<br />

first 7 days<br />

of life/1000<br />

births<br />

Source: Adapted from Barron, Petal (2006). The <strong>District</strong> Health Barometer: 2005/06<br />

The particularly worrying aspects of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s health services are highlighted in the<br />

table above. The most obvious point of concern is the low levels of spending on PHC in a<br />

<strong>District</strong> that is predominantly rural and has high levels of poverty. The nevirapine uptake rate<br />

among newborn babies of HIV positive women is also quite low in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, compared to<br />

the rest of the country. The PHC utilization rate is also comparatively low at 1, 5 visits per<br />

person annually (compared to the national average of 2, 1 visits).<br />

According to the <strong>District</strong> Health Barometer, the improved immunization coverage rate,<br />

accompanied by declining drop-out rates, over the years indicate that there has been a<br />

successful immunization programme in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

HIV/AIDS


173<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted HIV/AIDS Plan in 2007 and reviewed it in<br />

2009. According to the Limpopo Facility Indicator Data 2008/09 an official record of the<br />

spread of the HIV/AIDS plan in the Department of health and social development is as<br />

indicated below:<br />

Table 55: State of HIV/AIDS<br />

Total Stats June 2009<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Name of facility Female Male Children Total Stats Grant<br />

Sept 09 Total<br />

Elias Motsoaledi Groblersdal Hospital 216 103 33 71 4<strong>23</strong><br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Philadelphia Hospital 1037 353 122 32 1544<br />

Fetakgomo<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Ephraim<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Greater<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Local Motsepe Clinic 35 3 0 15 53<br />

Nchabeleng Hospital / 126 33 0 13 182<br />

CHC<br />

Mogale Matlala Hospital 499 102 33 61 695<br />

Tubatse Burgersfort CHC 133 57 17 75 282<br />

Dilokong Hospital 456 1<strong>14</strong> 44 33 647<br />

Mecklenburg Hospital 46 217 27 <strong>23</strong> 313<br />

Makhuduthamaga<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Jane Furse Hospital 774 222 54 51 1101<br />

St Rita’s Hospital 1375 542 261 124 <strong>23</strong>02<br />

Source: Limpopo-Facility Indicator Data 2008-09 A<br />

The significance of the statistics above is that there are people infected with HIV/AIDS in the<br />

<strong>District</strong>. The Department of Health and Social Development has a comprehensive system of<br />

testing, administering of treatment and counseling. The main challenge facing the<br />

department is that testing is voluntary. As a result more effort is needed to convince people<br />

to come to the fore and be tested. This should be accompanied by prior counseling to enable<br />

people who will be diagnosed HIV/AIDS to live with themselves.<br />

The Department has also rolled out a treatment plan which seems to be effective. It is<br />

however displeasing to note that some patients are skipping their dosages. The challenge<br />

could be the stigma that is attached to the disease by communities. More should be done to<br />

educate the community about the normally of living with virus.


174<br />

The <strong>District</strong> has engendered the following interventionist measures to try and fight the<br />

scourge:<br />

In <strong>July</strong> 2002, the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> development an HIV/AIDS strategy to guide public<br />

interventions in the area. The <strong>District</strong> also launched the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> HIV/AIDS Council<br />

whose key focus areas are education and awareness raising, support for people living with<br />

HIV/AIDS and care for children in distress.<br />

NGOs such as Love Life and others also provide support in awareness and education<br />

campaigns aimed at reducing HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases within the<br />

<strong>District</strong>.<br />

The <strong>District</strong> also launched a <strong>District</strong> Health Council, which will serve as advisory body to the<br />

Mayors on health matters and develop strategies on how to accelerate service delivery in<br />

the <strong>District</strong>. The major challenge at the moment is a serious lack of facilities to manage<br />

diseases in all health care facilities. The focus in the next financial years will include support<br />

to NGOs that work with people infected and affected by HIV/AIDS.<br />

BACKLOGS FOR BUILDING OF CLINICS<br />

Table 56: Backlog for Building of Clinics<br />

Name of <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Clinics<br />

Ephraim Mogale 8<br />

Greater Tubatse 5<br />

Makhuduthamaga 4<br />

Fetakgomo 6<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 5<br />

TOTAL/SDM 22<br />

Source: Dept. Of Health and Social Development – 2009<br />

Table 57: Health facilities<br />

Fetakgomo Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Tubatse Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Makhuduthamaga Total<br />

Mobile<br />

clinic 19 36 48 37 56 196<br />

Clinic 15 <strong>14</strong> 28 16 22 95<br />

Hospital 0 1 2 2 2 7<br />

No<br />

health<br />

facility 72 11 <strong>14</strong>2 87 82 394


175<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

There are 298 health facilities in the district municipality. Of the 298 facilities, there are 196<br />

mobile clinics, 95 clinics and 7 hospitals. In 394 of the villages there are no health facilities<br />

that are provided or even mobile facilities. 2 Hospitals are located in Greater Tubatse Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>, which is, Dilokong Hospital and Mcklenburg Hospital. Makhuduthamaga also<br />

hosts two hospitals namely, Jane Furse Hospital and St. Ritas. In Elias Motsoaledi Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> there is Groblersdal hospital and Philadelphia hospital. The final hospital is<br />

located at Tsimanyane which is Matlala Hospital.<br />

The provision of health facilities is the responsibility of the department of health. In general,<br />

because of the dispersed spatial structure of the district, people still travel long distances to<br />

access health facilities and in many areas there is still mobile facilities that are often not<br />

reliable and at times not providing comprehensive health care.<br />

Table 58: Health facilities satisfaction status<br />

Fetakgomo Ephraim Tubatse Elias Makhudut Total Total<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Motsoaledi hamaga<br />

Satisfactory 11 6 10 8 5 40 13%<br />

Unsatisfacto<br />

ry 20 44 76 45 80 265 87%<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

In the 298 health facilities that were surveyed, 40 (13%) of them were recorded as providing<br />

service that is satisfactory and a high number 265 (87%) were seen as providing inferior<br />

service. Therefore <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> must work with the Department of<br />

Health to deal with the weaknesses that may exist so that the service is improved<br />

tremendously.<br />

Table 59: Health Facilities water supply<br />

Ephraim<br />

Elias<br />

%<br />

Fetakgomo M Tubatse M Makhuduthamaga Total<br />

Borehole 16 5 37 18 28 104 34%<br />

Municipal<br />

10%<br />

Water 0 12 1 0 16 29<br />

River 1 0 1 1 9 12 4%<br />

Water Tanks 7 4 11 22 7%<br />

Other 12 32 40 21 31 136 45%<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

The data shows that 104 of the health facilities in the district are using borehole water<br />

compared to 29 that are using municipal water. 22 of the health facilities are using water<br />

tankers to supply water and a great number (45%) are using other systems.


176<br />

There is a need for the district to develop a strategy for providing water to health facilities on<br />

a sustainable basis and it could also serve as a basis for revenue enhancement. The focus<br />

should be on the 7 hospitals that exist and the strategy could look at both water and<br />

sanitation provision.<br />

It is very common to establish that most hospitals in the district are using their own private<br />

and independent sanitation system (such as ponds) which is not the highest level of service<br />

that can be expected.<br />

Table 60: Health facilities sanitation supply<br />

Ephraim<br />

Fetakgomo Mogale Tubatse<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Makhudu<br />

thamaga Total %<br />

Pit<br />

Latrines 20 11 30 21 40 122 37%<br />

VIP 4 8 9 0 4 25 8%<br />

Sewer 6 <strong>14</strong> <strong>14</strong> 12 46 <strong>14</strong>%<br />

Other 10 33 31 31 28 133 41%<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

With regard to sanitation provision, 122 (37%) of the health facilities are making use of pit<br />

latrines as a form of sanitation. 25 (8%) are using Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines as<br />

sanitation and only 46 (<strong>14</strong>%) are making use of sewer borne sanitation. The remainder, 133<br />

(41%) are using other systems.<br />

Access to sanitation is still a big challenge in the district where 220 000 households are<br />

using pit latrines and 13 510 have no sanitation at all. The district working together with<br />

department of health need to prioritise those critical health facilities that require sanitation<br />

supply. Sanitation is inextricably linked to water supply and it is obvious that once water<br />

supply is dealt with, then it will also be easier to extend sanitation to health facilities.<br />

Table 61: Health Facilities electricity available<br />

Fetakgomo Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Tubatse Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Total %<br />

Yes 22 15 42 30 39 <strong>14</strong>8 49%<br />

No 12 30 44 21 45 152 51%<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

49% of the health facilities surveyed have access to electricity compared to 51% that have<br />

no access to electricity. Although health facilities that have no access to electricity might<br />

seem higher, it is because most facilities are mobile clinics and therefore it is highly probable<br />

that the villages which they serve do have electricity. Access to electricity in the district for<br />

households stands at 86% and therefore should not be of concern.<br />

Challenges


177<br />

• Improvement of health services in terms of Customer Care<br />

• Lack of more funding for primary Health Care.<br />

• Inadequate health infrastructure,<br />

• Inaccessibility of health due to poor roads and inadequate transportation<br />

• Lack of health professionals in clinics and hospitals.<br />

• Lack of medication at clinics and mobile clinics.<br />

• Stigma attached to the HIV/AIDS disease by communities.<br />

• Awareness campaign to educate the community about the normality of living with the<br />

Virus.<br />

3.4.13. Education<br />

Introduction<br />

In terms of Schedule 4 Part A of the Constitution, education at all levels, excluding tertiary<br />

institutions, falls under the function areas of concurrent national and Provincial Legislative<br />

competence. As such all education related issues in the <strong>District</strong> are dealt with by the<br />

Limpopo Department of Education (LDoE).<br />

Education is a means of promoting good citizenship as well as preparing our people for the<br />

needs of a modern economy and a democratic society. Building on the achievements in<br />

education, the government must aim to ensure progressive realization of universal<br />

schooling, improving quality education and eliminating disparities and inequalities.<br />

Education is important for both economic and social development. It is the bedrock on which<br />

a nation’s economic destiny is built, particularly in today’s global knowledge economy. It is<br />

also often the primary means through which individuals set out on their personal journeys of<br />

growth and attain their distinctive dreams and aspirations. International evidence suggests<br />

that invest significantly in education reap major economic benefits in the medium to long<br />

term, and help build a more cohesive social fabric within the nation.<br />

Status Quo<br />

The Percentage of the population in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is older than 20 years of age with no<br />

schooling and is the highest in Limpopo and Mpumalanga provinces. That figure is also<br />

more than twice that of the South African population.<br />

The table below sets out the education profile of each local municipality in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />

Table 62: Education profile per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> None Primary Secondary Tertiary Unspecified/<br />

Disability<br />

Under<br />

age of 5<br />

Fetakgomo 32,318 19,705 <strong>23</strong>,665 1,077 2,5<strong>23</strong> 11,441<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 67,084 60,165 57,<strong>14</strong>4 3,262 10,124 30,103


178<br />

Ephraim Mogale 24,318 25,156 21,681 1,022 2,750 12,046<br />

Tubatse 62,401 48,003 48,331 1,488 6,967 27,419<br />

Makhuduthamaga 86,392 77,158 69,715 3,415 7,905 39,254<br />

Total 272,513 <strong>23</strong>0,187 220,536 10,264 30,269 120,263<br />

% 278,8 <strong>23</strong>,5 22,5 1,0 3,0 12,3<br />

Source: 2006-07 SDM <strong>IDP</strong><br />

As indicated in the table above, the <strong>District</strong> has a relatively high illiteracy level, with almost<br />

28% of the population having no formal school education whatsoever. Only around 1% of the<br />

population has obtained tertiary educations. Currently within the district there are crèches,<br />

Pre Schools, Special School, ABET Centres, Primary schools, Secondary schools and FET<br />

Colleges. Early Childhood Development (ECD) is still lacking in our <strong>District</strong>. There is still little<br />

or no focus at all on ECD. There are no Universities in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

The LEGDP indicate that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has the least of highly skilled individuals in the total<br />

province. The low skills reduce the ability of the <strong>District</strong> to be innovative and economically<br />

productive.<br />

While there has been an improvement, this has been far below that of the other DMs in the<br />

Limpopo Province. The percentage of those with Grade 12/Matric in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> DM is also<br />

nearly half of the South African population and the lowest of all the DMS in the Limpopo and<br />

Mpumalanga provinces. The lack of skills is frustrating the current and future development of<br />

the area. It is also the high percentages of persons with no schooling which require a<br />

buoyant entrepreneurial class to establish industries that those with low skills levels could be<br />

absorbed in.<br />

The low percentage of the population having managed to obtained tertiary education<br />

qualification bear witness to the infrastructure that is available in schools. Most of the<br />

schools in the district do not have facilities like Sanitation, Water and Electricity. Shortage of<br />

infrastructure impacts much on future educational development of this district.<br />

Table 63: Shortage of Infrastructure in schools<br />

Total number Schools % Schools % Schools %<br />

of schools without water without<br />

sanitation<br />

without<br />

electricity<br />

905 283 31% 507 56% 203 22%<br />

Source: Limpopo <strong>District</strong> Education department and circuits offices<br />

The above mentioned needs to be aligned with the status quo information the SDM has on<br />

services backlogs to ensure informed, integrated planning and budgeting, not only for the<br />

2009/2010 financial year but the coming outer years. The district municipality will also<br />

continue to work with department of education with regard to necessary information that<br />

would assist in the <strong>IDP</strong>/Budget process.


179<br />

Table 64: Backlogs for the building of schools<br />

Name of <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Number of Schools<br />

1. Fetakgomo 12<br />

2. Makhuduthamaga 22<br />

3. Ephraim Mogale 11<br />

4. Greater Tubatse 06<br />

5. Elias Motsoaledi 05<br />

TOTAL 56<br />

Source: Department of Education<br />

Table 65: Schools per Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Fetakgomo Ephraim Tubatse Elias Makhuduthamaga %<br />

Mogale<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Number of 57 62 155 95 167 60%<br />

primary<br />

Number of 33 44 88 60 102 36%<br />

secondary<br />

Number of 4 3 3 21 5 2%<br />

combined<br />

Special 0 0 0 1 0 1%<br />

Schools<br />

FET 0 0 1 1 0 1%<br />

Total 94 109 247 178 274 100%<br />

In the year 2011, 902 educational facilities were recorded across the district. Out of this total<br />

number, 536 are primary schools and 327 are secondary schools. 36 schools were recorded<br />

as combined schools (meaning primary and secondary at same school). There is one<br />

special school that was recorded mainly in Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. It is also<br />

interesting to note that most schools are found in Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (274),<br />

followed by Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (247), Elias Motsoaledi (178) and the<br />

remainder are situated in Ephraim Mogale and Fetakgomo Local Municipalities.<br />

The numbers of educational facilities that have been provided in the district seem to be<br />

adequate in the district. The general standard in that for every 1000 households, there is a<br />

need for 2 primary schools and 1 secondary. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has 263 000<br />

households. This means there is a need for 263 secondary schools and 526 primary<br />

schools. There exists 536 primary schools and the need is 526 compared to existing 327<br />

secondary schools where the need is 263 secondary schools. Although the average<br />

scenario indicates that enough schools have been provided, there is still a challenge due to<br />

long walking distances to these educational facilities.<br />

Table 66: Schools source of water<br />

Ephraim Tubatse Elias<br />

100%<br />

Fetakgomo M M M Makhuduthamaga Total<br />

Borehole 50 42 174 117 167 550 60%<br />

Municipal<br />

water 30 64 9 36 61 200<br />

22%


180<br />

River 0 0 <strong>23</strong> 5 28 3%<br />

Water tanks 0 0 16 8 24 2%<br />

No water<br />

13%<br />

supply 33 6 22 19 36 116<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

The data indicates that 550 (60%) educational facilities obtain water from boreholes. 200<br />

(22%) of the schools in the district get water supply from municipal supply system. There are<br />

schools that still do not have water supply at all standing at 116 (13%). 24 (2%) schools also<br />

obtain water from water tankers.<br />

Provision of water to schools remains within the purview of the Department of education and<br />

the role of the municipalities remains water connections provisions and billing. There is a<br />

need for the district municipality as water services provider and authority to liaise with<br />

Department of Education regarding schools that do not have access to water services.<br />

The schools normally are undertaking feeding schemes which require water for cooking and<br />

boiling therefore it requires that all the relevant stakeholders play an important role in as far<br />

as provision of water.<br />

Table 67: Schools type of sanitation<br />

Fetakgomo<br />

Ephraim<br />

M<br />

Tubatse<br />

M<br />

Elias<br />

M<br />

100%<br />

Makhuduthamaga Total<br />

pit latrines 73 72 189 131 210 675 74%<br />

VIP 24 6 41 43 1<strong>14</strong> 12%<br />

Sewer <strong>14</strong> 8 11 35 11 79 9%<br />

Other 10 4 27 7 48 5%<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Sanitation remains one of the important services that must be provided in schools. The table<br />

indicates that 675 (74%) schools are making use of pit latrines as a form of sanitation. 1<strong>14</strong><br />

(12%) schools are using Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines (VIP’s) and 79 (9%) are making<br />

use of sewer borne sanitation.<br />

Once again the provision of sanitation to educational facilities rests with the Department of<br />

Basic Education and all measures have to be undertaken by the department.<br />

Table 68: Schools electricity availability<br />

Fetakgomo Ephraim M Tubatse M Elias M Makhuduthamaga Total %<br />

Yes 89 100 <strong>23</strong>0 153 <strong>23</strong>5 807 93%<br />

No 13 2 <strong>14</strong> 4 27 60 7%<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

The majority of schools in the district municipality do have access to electricity. The table<br />

above indicates that 807 (93%) recorded that they have access to electricity compared to 60


181<br />

(7%) that have no access to electricity. Most of these schools are found in Makhuduthamaga<br />

(27); followed by Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (<strong>14</strong>) and Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

(13) are the remainder are in Elias Motsoaledi and Ephraim Mogale respectively.<br />

The responsibility for electrification lies with Eskom and it is also the responsibility of the<br />

Department of Basic Education to ensure that schools are electrified to improve learning<br />

environment.<br />

Table 69: Early childhood development centres<br />

Fetakgomo Ephraim Tubatse Elias Makhudutha Total<br />

Mogale<br />

Motsoaledi maga<br />

ECD<br />

available<br />

116 71 191 163 257 798<br />

ECD Not<br />

available<br />

12 10 85 21 0 128<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has 740 villages. There are 798 Early Childhood<br />

Development Centres (ECD’s) across the district. There are 128 villages where ECD’s are<br />

not available. The number of ECD’s far exceeds the number of villages and this is because<br />

in some large villages, there are more than one ECD’s.<br />

Challenges<br />

· Lack of tertiary institutions within the district make percentage of people with post<br />

matric qualifications very low.<br />

· Lack of support to Early Childhood Development (ECD).<br />

· Delivery of basic services like water, sanitation and electricity to school.<br />

· Lack of effective literacy campaigns and ABET Centres to reduce illiteracy level.<br />

· Lack of learnership and bursary schemes for students.<br />

3.4.<strong>14</strong>. Social Services (Welfare)<br />

Introduction<br />

The provision of social services is a competence of concurrent National and Provincial<br />

governments, as promulgated in schedule 4 Part A of the Constitution. Social development<br />

systems form the backbone of assistance to the vulnerable in most advanced societies. Most<br />

countries acknowledge that whilst they strive towards full economic and social development,<br />

the more vulnerable members of society – especially children and the elderly – would require<br />

some form of state assistance.<br />

In many social democratic countries, a basic income grant is also made available to the<br />

poorest members of society to assist them in meeting their basic daily needs. The amount of<br />

money that a government usually spends on social development (and on social expenditure,


182<br />

Local<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Makhu<br />

dutham<br />

aga<br />

more generally) tends to be determined by the economic health of the country at that point in<br />

its history. In South Africa, social expenditure has increased considerably over the years<br />

because of a favourable balance of payments situation as well as increased revenue from<br />

the South African Revenue Services (SARS).<br />

Social development systems are particularly important in places like <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> which are<br />

predominantly rural and have high poverty levels. As illustrated earlier in this chapter, the<br />

majority of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s population is young, unemployment is rife and the district<br />

consequently exhibits an extremely high dependency ratio. Most of this population is<br />

dependent on government grants in order to survive.<br />

Table 70: Statistics on Grant Beneficiaries<br />

O/A D/G W/V COMB GIA FCG<br />

BEN<br />

FCG<br />

CH/<br />

REN<br />

CDG<br />

BEN<br />

CDG<br />

CH/<br />

REN<br />

CSG<br />

BEN<br />

CSH<br />

CH/R<br />

EN<br />

BEN<br />

CH/R<br />

EN<br />

<strong>23</strong>82 5566 10 11 131 1505 2429 683 716 40044 71263 71775 74408<br />

Ephrai<br />

m<br />

Mogale<br />

3857 825 3 4 27 515 877 81 85 8881 15604 <strong>14</strong>193 16566<br />

Fetakg<br />

omo<br />

Greater<br />

Tubats<br />

e<br />

1008<br />

1<br />

1697<br />

0<br />

2249 4 7 44 562 953 180 189 13582 24550 26709 25693<br />

4389 2 20 46 1615 2973 575 609 39406 38067 630<strong>23</strong> 71349<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoa<br />

ledi<br />

5047 1037 0 5 11 703 1130 153 162 11825 19805 18781 21097<br />

Total 5978<br />

0<br />

<strong>14</strong>06<br />

6<br />

19 47 259 4900 8062 1672 1761 11373<br />

8<br />

19928<br />

9<br />

19448<br />

1<br />

20911<br />

2<br />

Table 39 above presents the statistics on grants beneficiaries are obtained from the South<br />

African Social Security Agency (SASSA). The figures indicated in the table 40 below change<br />

every month due to new approvals, births and deaths. The SASSA shows that the state<br />

resources are spend in the form of child grants in the areas that are predominantly rural.<br />

Many of these beneficiaries are either fostered, old aged, depended, need support one way<br />

or the other hence they receive different forms of grants. Issues contributing to high<br />

dependency rate on grants range from amongst others, orphans resulting from HIV/AIDS<br />

related deaths, child-headed households.


183<br />

Status Quo<br />

Social Safety Nets in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Poverty in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is endemic. As earlier sections have revealed, there is an<br />

overwhelming dependence on state-provided social security nets at present. The table below<br />

sets out the key government programmes that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households currently receive.<br />

Table 71: Beneficiaries of Key government programmes<br />

Programme<br />

% Households<br />

National School Nutrition Programme 70,3<br />

Food parcel scheme (beneficiaries all live long main transport 12,9<br />

areas)<br />

Expanded Public Works Programme 8,3<br />

Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Programme 5,1<br />

Agricultural Starter Pack Programme 5,0<br />

Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme 4,3<br />

Poverty relief programme 3,4<br />

Other government programme 2,2<br />

Land redistribution for agricultural development 1,5<br />

Unemployment Insurance Fund 1,3<br />

Land restitution programme 0,8<br />

Land care programme 0,7<br />

Beneficiary – municipality implemented food security projects 0,7<br />

Total 100<br />

Source: DoA and FIVIMS (2007b). How households fight stresses that contribute to food insecurity.<br />

This list presents interesting information about how the majority of households in<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> acquire sufficient income to meet their basic needs.<br />

Food Insecurity and Vulnerability<br />

The issue of food security cuts to the heart of the social agenda, as it involves people’s most<br />

basic needs – that of acquiring enough food to survive and live a reasonably fulfilling life.<br />

Food insecurity occurs when people are under-nourished, a state that usually arises when<br />

their food intake falls below their minimum calorie (energy) requirements. Undernourishment<br />

can be the result of several factors, including the physical unavailability of food<br />

(e.g. during a drought) or an inability to purchase food because of financial constraints.<br />

Individuals or households are said to be vulnerable to food insecurity when they are exposed<br />

to several risk factors (such as living in drought-prone area) which they may not have<br />

adequate coping mechanism for. Food insecurity is therefore an extremely revealing<br />

indicator of poverty levels in a municipality.


184<br />

However, the issue is a complex one, involving multiple factors like land availability, access<br />

to natural resources and the socio-economic circumstances of communities. The National<br />

Department of Agriculture (DoA) undertook a comprehensive livelihoods survey in the<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> area, both in 2004 and 2006 (DoA), (2006).<br />

The survey highlighted the fact that some of the areas facing the worst levels of food<br />

insecurity in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> were within the following villages:<br />

Table 72: Most food – insecure areas in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Village <strong>Municipality</strong> Score<br />

Ga-Mampa Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,86<br />

Ga-Mampuru Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,86<br />

Ga-Masha Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,85<br />

Santeng Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,85<br />

Puma Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,85<br />

Monsterlus Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,84<br />

Ngwaritsi Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,84<br />

Kgautswane Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,78<br />

Tshehlwaneng Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,70<br />

Vlakplaas Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,68<br />

Ga-Moloi Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,61<br />

Bogalatladi Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,59<br />

Monametsi Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,52<br />

Malope Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,51<br />

Mphanama Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,34<br />

Kromdraai Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 42,26<br />

Doornspruit Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 41,75<br />

Mamphokgo Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 41,50<br />

Tsimanyane Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 41,41<br />

Vaalbank Ephraim Mogale local <strong>Municipality</strong> 41,39<br />

Sephaku Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 39,11<br />

Small Phooko Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 37,50<br />

Magneetshoogte Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> 37,46<br />

Source: DoA (2006). Livelihood survey conducted in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> of Limpopo<br />

Food insecurity within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is the result of several factors. Within the past 12<br />

months, the key shocks that communities within the <strong>District</strong> generally experienced were food<br />

price increases, petrol hikes, the growing costs of producing food, an increase in the number<br />

of individuals within households, violence, theft and illness (DoA and FIVIMS, 2007b).<br />

There’s also some evidence that ongoing water scarcity and limited economic opportunities<br />

within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> limit the ability of its residents to adapt and cope to external stresses and<br />

shocks (SEI, 2007). All these factors increase the vulnerability of communities within the<br />

<strong>District</strong>, and make it less easy for them to cope with food shortages when they occurred.


185<br />

In 2006, researchers interviewed 500 carefully-targeted households in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. They<br />

emerged with the following findings for the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

53% of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> residents skip meals because of a lack of food. More than 50% of<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Children eat less than they need to because of a shortage of food.36% of<br />

children in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> said they sometimes went to bed hungry because there was no<br />

money to buy food (HSRC, 2006).<br />

The DoA study revealed that 63% of households within the <strong>District</strong> were food insecure and<br />

that levels of hunger were on the increase (DoA and FIVIMS, 2007b). It also shows that<br />

Tubatse and Fetakgomo Local Municipalities are the most income-deprived areas in the<br />

<strong>District</strong>, and both also have the highest levels of food shortage in the area.<br />

Table 73: Pension pay points<br />

Fetakgomo Ephraim M Tubatse Elias M Makhuduthamaga Total<br />

yes 43 40 85 42 107 317<br />

no 55 15 150 5 59 284<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Out of the 740 villages that are found in the district, there are 317 pension pay points. 284<br />

villages indicated that they have no pension pay points. The implication is that they are using<br />

pension pay points in neighbouring villages. It is also interesting to note that thanks to<br />

electronic payment systems, most pensioners are no longer required to physically arrive at<br />

pension pay points to receive their grants.<br />

There is no model that has been developed for pension pay points facilities and the practice<br />

is that existing infrastructure such as shops, tribal offices and other community centres are<br />

being used as pension pay points. It makes great sense because this only happens once a<br />

month.<br />

Table 74: Pension pay points water supply<br />

Fetakgomo Ephraim<br />

M<br />

Tubatse Elias M Makhuduthamaga Total %<br />

Borehole 8 2 <strong>23</strong> 9 21 63 19%<br />

River 1 0 10 0 0 11 3%<br />

Water<br />

tanker<br />

1 4 10 0 0 15 4%<br />

Municipal 8 17 4 4 <strong>23</strong> 56 17%


186<br />

supply<br />

No<br />

supply<br />

water<br />

25 19 40 40 63 187 56%<br />

Other 0 0 2 0 0 2 1%<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

There are 317 pension pay points in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. Most of the pension<br />

pay points have no water supply (56%) and 63 (19%) are using borehole water. Only 56<br />

(17%) of the pension pay points are using municipal water.<br />

It will be difficult to make interventions regarding water supply to pension pay points simply<br />

because they are only used once a month and that there are no formal structures that are<br />

classified as pension pay points. As water infrastructure is being rolled out to villages, which<br />

will have indirect impact on water supply to villages.<br />

Table 75: Pension pay points sanitation available<br />

Fetakgom<br />

o<br />

Ephraim<br />

M Tubatse Elias M<br />

Makhuduthamag<br />

a<br />

Total<br />

pit latrines <strong>23</strong> 21 39 18 71 172<br />

vip 4 0 9 0 0 13<br />

municipal<br />

sewer 1 6 8 3 1 19<br />

no sanitation 16 15 26 29 35 121<br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong> 20<strong>14</strong><br />

It is clear from the table above that 172 pension pay points are using pit latrines as a form of<br />

sanitation. 13 are using Ventilated Improved Pit latrines. 19 are using municipal water and<br />

121 have no sanitation.<br />

Again it is very difficult to make interventions on pension pay points because they are<br />

located within the premises of private businesses, community centers and tribal authorities.<br />

The Department of social development must work jointly with the sites where pension pay<br />

outs are being to improve the situation.<br />

Table 76: Pension pay points electricity available<br />

Fetakgomo Ephraim M Tubatse Elias M Makhuduthamaga Total<br />

yes 28 25 51 32 74 210<br />

no 19 17 34 20 33 1<strong>23</strong><br />

SDM ward committees <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>


187<br />

It has been established that 210 pension pay points have electricity compared to 1<strong>23</strong> that<br />

have no access to electricity.<br />

Challenges<br />

Shocks and stresses affecting <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households in 2006<br />

A survey also highlighted the major shocks and stresses affecting <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households<br />

in 2006. These included the fact that:<br />

· Almost one-quarter (<strong>23</strong>%) of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> households suffered the death of an adult<br />

member of the households in 2006<br />

· Almost one-seventh (15%) suffered the death of a child in the household<br />

· 19% had been victims of drought<br />

· Nearly one-fifth (17%) had experienced joblessness<br />

· Food price increases had impacted on <strong>14</strong>% of households<br />

· Almost 1 in 9 (11%) lack access to clean water<br />

· Other shocks included:<br />

· Increased in household size (9%)<br />

· Serious injury or chronic illness preventing normal activities (7%)<br />

· Loss of remittances (4%)<br />

Source: (Drimie, S, undated)<br />

3.4.15. Safety and Security<br />

Introduction<br />

Combating crime forms one of the governmental strategic priorities within the medium term<br />

period. Safety and security issues remain critical in crime prevention measures in the<br />

<strong>District</strong>. Communities lack policing facilities that would assist in either reporting or combating<br />

crimes in their areas. It means the responsibility of the state to make sure that police<br />

Stations are well equipped to deal with any type of crime that might be experience among<br />

communities.<br />

Status Quo<br />

There are six magistrate courts in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>. These are Magistrate Praktiseer<br />

(next to Burgersfort), Magistrate <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> (in Schoonord), magistrate Nebo in<br />

Phokwane), Magistrate Moutse, Magistrate Sempupuru and Magistrate Groblersdal<br />

(Groblersdal). These magistrate courts serve a population of 1,090,424 people.<br />

When researching <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s tourism potential as part of its 2025 Strategy, the <strong>District</strong><br />

found that crime was a weakness that could potentially undermine tourism efforts in the area<br />

(G Steyn and Associates, 2006). More recently, the <strong>District</strong>’s <strong>IDP</strong> consultations with


188<br />

communities found that the issue of crime was a recurring theme. The most important issue<br />

raised by communities and stakeholder groups (such as business, farmers, traditional<br />

leaders and civil society organizations) concern:<br />

· The presence of gangs in some communities.<br />

· The lack of electricity and proper lighting exacerbated the problem of crime.<br />

· There should be more police stations in the area as people sometimes have trouble<br />

accessing distant stations (SDM, 2007b).<br />

· Lack of satellite Police Station.<br />

Table 77: Crime Statistics in the SDM<br />

MUNICIPALITY CRIME TYPE 2008/2009 2009/2010 VARIANCE<br />

ELIAS MOTSOALEDI LM<br />

(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (Excluding 395 439 44<br />

residential premises)<br />

(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 254 <strong>23</strong>2 22<br />

(DSSC 01) Murder 64 52 12<br />

(DSSC 13) Assault common 595 475 120<br />

(PCH 06 Robbery: Aggravating 216 154 62<br />

circumstances excluding TRIO CRI<br />

(DSSC 06) Rape 263 260 3<br />

(DSSC 07) Sexual assault 20 25 -5<br />

(DSSC 33) Attempted robbery: 7 12 -5<br />

Aggravated: with fire-arm<br />

(DSSC 12) Assault GBH 852 881 -29<br />

(DSSC 34) Common robbery 194 185 9<br />

(DSSC 46) Robbery with weapon 25 40 15<br />

other than firearm<br />

PCH <strong>14</strong>9 Car jacking 43 24 19<br />

(DSSC 02) Attempted murder 86 78 8<br />

PCH <strong>14</strong>7 House Robbery 34 31 11<br />

(DSSC 35) Attempted common 1 4 -3<br />

robbery<br />

PCH <strong>14</strong>8 Business robbery 58 72 -<strong>14</strong><br />

(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (excluding 488 439 49<br />

residential premises)<br />

(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 254 <strong>23</strong>2 22<br />

(DSSC 15) Burglary (Houses) 803 785 18<br />

(DSSC 19) Theft off/from/off motor 104 138 -34<br />

vehicle<br />

(DSSC 18) Theft of motor vehicle 94 87 7<br />

and motor cycle<br />

(DSSC 40) Attempted theft of motor<br />

vehicle and motorcycle<br />

5 8 -3


189<br />

MUNICIPALITY CRIME TYPE 2008/2009 2009/2010 VARIANCE<br />

(DSSC 38) Attempted burglaries 6 11 -5<br />

business<br />

(DSSC 39) Attempted burglaries 5 3 2<br />

(Houses)<br />

Ephraim Mogale LM<br />

(DSSC 35) Attempted common 1 0 1<br />

robbery<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>9) Car jacking 3 2 1<br />

(PCH 06) Robbery: Aggravating 15 9 6<br />

circumstances excluding TRIO CRI<br />

(DSSC 06) Rape 35 27 8<br />

(DSSC 07) Sexual assault 3 1 2<br />

(DSSC 33) Attempted robbery: 4 1 3<br />

Aggravated: with fire-arm<br />

(DSSC 12) Assault GBH 118 1<strong>14</strong> 7<br />

(DSSC 01) Murder 4 7 -3<br />

(DSSC 02) Attempted murder 16 12 4<br />

(DSSC 13) Assault common 56 88 -32<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>7) House Robbery 8 12 -4<br />

(DSSC 34) Common robbery 25 38 -13<br />

(DSSC 46) Robbery with weapon 1 3 -2<br />

other than firearm<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>8) Business robbery 2 8 -6<br />

(DSSC 39) Attempted burglaries 1 0 1<br />

(Houses)<br />

(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 18 26 -8<br />

(DSSC 15) Burglary (Houses) 218 200 18<br />

(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (excluding 59 50 9<br />

residential premises)<br />

(DSSC 40) Attempted theft of motor 1 1 0<br />

vehicle and motorcycle<br />

(DSSC 18) Theft of motor vehicle 16 27 -11<br />

and motor cycle<br />

(DSSC 38) Attempted burglaries 2 1 1<br />

business<br />

(DSSC 19) Theft off/from/off motor 15 28 -13<br />

vehicle<br />

Makhuduthamaga LM<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>9) Car jacking 15 11 4<br />

(DSSC 01) Murder 63 41 22<br />

(PCH 06) Robbery: Aggravating 131 157 -26<br />

circumstances excluding TRIO CRI<br />

(DSSC 12) Assault GBH 429 426 3


190<br />

MUNICIPALITY CRIME TYPE 2008/2009 2009/2010 VARIANCE<br />

(DSSC 02) Attempted murder 56 63 -7<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>8) Business robbery 33 22 11<br />

(DSSC 34) Common robbery 89 85 4<br />

(DSSC 13) Assault common 205 216 -11<br />

(DSSC 06) Rape <strong>14</strong>7 157 -10<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>7) House Robbery 16 20 -4<br />

(DSSC 40) Attempted theft of motor 2 0 2<br />

vehicle and motorcycle<br />

(DSSC 18) Theft of motor vehicle 51 43 8<br />

and motor cycle<br />

(DSSC 15) Burglary (Houses) 303 301 2<br />

(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 91 76 15<br />

(DSSC 19) Theft off/from/off motor 46 37 24<br />

vehicle<br />

(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (excluding 306 253 53<br />

residential premises)<br />

(DSSC 07) Sexual assault 4 11 -7<br />

(DSSC 33) Attempted robbery: 5 8 -3<br />

Aggravated: with fire-arm<br />

(DSSC 38) Attempted burglaries 0 2 -2<br />

business<br />

(DSSC 46) Robbery with weapon 2 2 0<br />

other than firearm<br />

(DSSC 39) Attempted burglaries 3 1 2<br />

(Houses)<br />

(DSSC 41) Attempted theft from/off 0 1 -1<br />

motor vehicle<br />

Fetakgomo LM<br />

(DSSC 33) Attempted robbery: 2 0 2<br />

Aggravated: with fire-arm<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>8) Business robbery 7 3 4<br />

(PCH 06) Robbery: Aggravating 12 6 6<br />

circumstances excluding TRIO CRI<br />

(DSSC 07) Sexual assault 3 2 7<br />

(DSSC 01) Murder 9 7 2<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>7) House Robbery 5 4 1<br />

(DSSC 06) Rape 25 24 1<br />

(DSSC 46) Robbery with weapon 1 1 0<br />

other than firearm<br />

(DSSC 34) Common robbery 11 12 -1<br />

(DSSC 13) Assault common 29 32 -3<br />

(DSSC 02) Attempted murder 8 9 -1<br />

(DSSC 12) Assault GBH 112 136 -24


191<br />

MUNICIPALITY CRIME TYPE 2008/2009 2009/2010 VARIANCE<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>9) Car jacking 1 2 -1<br />

(DSSC 39) Attempted burglaries 1 0 1<br />

(Houses)<br />

(DSSC 15) Burglary (Houses) 54 45 10<br />

(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 47 41 6<br />

(DSSC 38) Attempted burglaries 1 1 0<br />

business<br />

(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (excluding 73 74 -1<br />

residential premises)<br />

(DSSC 19) Theft off/from/off motor 7 8 -1<br />

vehicle<br />

(DSSC 18) Theft of motor vehicle 3 5 -2<br />

and motor cycle<br />

(DSSC 40) Attempted theft of motor 0 1 -1<br />

vehicle and motorcycle<br />

Greater Tubatse LM<br />

(DSSC 07) Sexual assault 11 10 1<br />

(DSSC 02) Attempted murder 40 28 12<br />

(DSSC 01) Murder 48 25 <strong>23</strong><br />

(DSSC 13) Assault common 363 344 19<br />

(DSSC 12) Assault GBH 516 594 -78<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>8) Business robbery 20 21 -1<br />

(DSSC 34) Common robbery 125 <strong>14</strong>3 -18<br />

(DSSC 06) Rape 129 157 -28<br />

(DSSC 33) Attempted robbery: 6 4 2<br />

Aggravated: with fire-arm<br />

(PCH 06) Robbery: Aggravating 42 40 2<br />

circumstances excluding TRIO CRI<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>9) Car jacking 17 <strong>23</strong> -6<br />

(DSSC 35) Attempted common 5 4 1<br />

robbery<br />

(PCH <strong>14</strong>7) House Robbery 13 24 -11<br />

(DSSC 38) Attempted burglaries 5 5 0<br />

business<br />

(DSSC 16) Theft of all stock 113 101 12<br />

(DSSC <strong>14</strong>) Burglary (excluding <strong>23</strong>1 304 -73<br />

residential premises)<br />

(DSSC 15) Burglary (Houses) 364 496 -132<br />

(DSSC 39) Attempted burglaries 2 4 -2<br />

(Houses)<br />

(DSSC 40) Attempted theft of motor 2 4 -2<br />

vehicle and motorcycle<br />

(DSSC 41) Attempted theft from/off 0 2 -2


192<br />

MUNICIPALITY CRIME TYPE 2008/2009 2009/2010 VARIANCE<br />

motor vehicle<br />

(DSSC 19) Theft off/from/off motor 51 70 -19<br />

vehicle<br />

(DSSC 18) Theft of motor vehicle 46 71 -25<br />

and motor cycle<br />

(DSSC 46) Robbery with weapon<br />

other than firearm<br />

2 1 1<br />

Challenges<br />

· Revival and capacitating of Community Policing Forums (CPFs)<br />

· Establishment of additional satellite police stations in the Municipalities<br />

· Conducting crime prevention and awareness campaigns<br />

3.4.16. Transportation<br />

Introduction<br />

For goods and services to be transported throughout the <strong>District</strong>, organized transport system<br />

is required. The main transport systems are the following; busses, taxis and trucks. There<br />

are two types of bus companies which are private and public. Private are those that are<br />

owned by individuals not related to government and public are those that are owned by an<br />

organ of state or government itself.<br />

Status Quo<br />

Air Transport<br />

There are no commercial airports or air transportation in the <strong>District</strong>. Present, there are only<br />

two registered airfields in the towns of Groblersdal and Marble Hall. They are used as<br />

emergency airfields. They are utilized mainly by the business and tourism sectors, as well as<br />

local farmers wishing to spray their cultivated fields. There is also an air strip in Elandskraal<br />

in the Ephraim Mogale <strong>Municipality</strong>, which is not maintained.<br />

Public Transport<br />

According to the <strong>District</strong>’s integrated Transport Plan, the most common forms of public<br />

passenger transport are the buses and taxes. The taxi industry determine its routes largely<br />

by looking at factors like the location of towns and villages, dominant economic activities in<br />

the area and employed status within the district.


193<br />

Transport routes in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> are often limited by deteriorating roads conditions as well as<br />

local storm water problems caused by rainy season. The following are the findings of the<br />

review of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> Current Public Transport Record (CPTR) and Integrated<br />

Transport Plan (ITP) in 2007. The report covered an overview of what is involved in public<br />

transport in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> with regard to facilities, the capacity<br />

utilization of ranks and routes, the waiting times of passengers and vehicles, the operational<br />

vehicle and the number of trips made per operational vehicle. The facility surveys were<br />

conducted at taxi ranks, bus terminals and train stations.<br />

The facility survey conducted indicated that the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> does not<br />

have commuter rail services.<br />

There are three bus terminals in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> and have a total of 82<br />

taxi facilities of which more than 75 per cent are informal.<br />

190 (approximately 50% outwards-bound) taxi routes in the SDM: 15% are in the Elias<br />

Motsoaledi LM, 3% in Fetakgomo LM, 17% in Ephraim Mogale LM, 43% in the Greater<br />

Tubatse LM and 22% in Makhuduthamaga LM.<br />

Of the subsidized bus routes in the SDM, 57% are in the Elias Motsoaledi LM and 43% in<br />

the Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

The main findings obtained from the analysis of the route utilization are that there is a vast<br />

oversupply of taxis on most routes in the SDM.<br />

The route utilization survey noted <strong>14</strong>62 taxis in the SDM area. Furthermore 1372 taxis were<br />

noted in the Elias Motsoaledi LM, 287 in Fetakgomo LM, 530 in Greater Tubatse LM and<br />

1083 in Makhuduthamaga LM.<br />

There are 28 buses in operation on the subsidized routes in the SDM area. There are<br />

metered-taxi activities in the Greater Tubatse LM, Light Delivery Vehicle (LDVs) are utilized<br />

for learners’ trips as well as the areas where the quality of the road is not good.<br />

Bus Industry<br />

There are two different types of bus operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>, namely:<br />

A. Subsidized operators<br />

B. Non-subsidized operators<br />

i) Subsidized Bus Operators<br />

Table 78: All subsidized bus operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> are shown in the table below:<br />

SUBSIDIZED BUS OPERATORS IN THE SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />

Subsidized Bus Operators<br />

Operational Area


194<br />

Great North Transport<br />

Great North Transport<br />

Source: Great North Transport<br />

Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

ii) Non Subsidized Operators<br />

There are four (4) non-subsidized bus operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> Municipal area.<br />

Since these buses are not used for commuter transport, no detailed information was<br />

obtained about these operations. The distribution of these operators with regard to the<br />

respective local municipalities in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is shown in the table<br />

below.<br />

Table 79: Distribut ion of Non-Subsidized Bus Operators in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> Municipa l<br />

Area:<br />

DISTRIBUTION OF NO-SUBSIDIZED BUS OPERATORS IN THE SEKHUKHUNE<br />

DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />

Operator Location of Operator Type of Operations<br />

Great North Transport Greater Tubatse Casual and scholar passengers<br />

Mahlangu Bus Services Greater Tubatse Mine and scholar passengers<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Express Greater Tubatse Mine passengers<br />

Thembalethu Bus Company Greater Tubatse Mine and scholar passengers<br />

Challenges<br />

· There is oversupply of taxis on most of routes in SDM<br />

· Taxis fighting for the use of certain routes<br />

· Light delivery vehicles used for the transportation of learners<br />

· Deterioration of road infrastructure<br />

· Lack of facilities for heavy vehicles<br />

· Inadequate signage<br />

· Lack of alternative routes for trucks<br />

3.5. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />

3.5.1. Introduction<br />

The attainment of the vision set out in this <strong>IDP</strong> will ultimately be determined by the state of<br />

the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy. The Expanded Public Works Programme has been earmarked as<br />

one of the other programmes that will fastracking job creation in the district. Other sections<br />

of this chapter have already painted a picture of the spatial, demographic and infrastructural<br />

challenges to economic development in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

This section turns its lens on the principal characteristics of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Economy more<br />

specifically. It identifies the municipal economy’s main features, describes its dominant<br />

sectors and concludes with assessment of its competitive advantage. It is therefore an


195<br />

important profile that plays a substantial role in defining the defining the development<br />

strategies, projects and overarching socio-economic plans of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy is a curious mixture of overwhelmingly negative features (such<br />

as the highest unemployment rate in Limpopo) and positive opportunities (like the enormous<br />

mining potential within the area). Plotting an economic development path therefore requires<br />

a careful assessment of the current economic reality in the district.<br />

3.5.2. Status Quo<br />

The Structure of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Economy<br />

Conventional wisdom has it that agriculture; mining and tourism are the three leading sectors<br />

in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy. Official statistics, however, paint a slightly different picture of<br />

the <strong>District</strong> economy being dominated by community services, mining and trade. It must be<br />

noted that it is very difficult to find accurate data for the local level in South Africa.<br />

Those data-gathering exercises that do exist often yield vastly different accounts of local<br />

realities. Most public sector plans and <strong>IDP</strong>’s however, draw on Stats SA data even whilst<br />

recognizing some of its limitations. The table below is drawn on from Stats SA data sets out<br />

the main sectoral contribution to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s Gross Geographic Product (GGP).<br />

Table 80: Key sectoral contributions to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s GGP (1995-2000)<br />

Sector 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000<br />

Agriculture and 11,472 10,828 9,060 11,607 11,295 12,074<br />

forestry<br />

Mining 304,975 340,825 385,950 433,274 447,409 510,348<br />

Manufacturing 30,564 35,650 45,420 46,311 52,220 60,532<br />

Electricity and 39,849 46,002 59,635 76,797 84,431 97,098<br />

Water<br />

Construction 10,717 13,416 <strong>14</strong>,707 13,440 12,938 10,888<br />

Trade and 215,203 253,344 284,010 363,9<strong>23</strong> 409,551 450,398<br />

Catering<br />

TPT and 20,026 56,029 70,793 74,507 77,737 80,708<br />

Communication<br />

Financial and 5,081 5,348 5,630 6,255 8,979 9,529<br />

business services<br />

Community 799,430 808,253 861,297 1,192,342 1,291,970 1,361,607<br />

Services<br />

Total 1,467,317 1,569,695 1,736,502 2,218,456 2,396,530 2,593,182<br />

Source: Stats SA (2001)<br />

What the data reveals is that in 2000, the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy depended largely on public<br />

sector funding with community services being a major factor in the area.


196<br />

The three main contributors to GGP were community services (52%), mining (20%) and<br />

trade (17%). Despite these findings, the <strong>District</strong> has very consciously chosen to explore the<br />

potential of mining, agriculture and tourism as key contributors to the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy<br />

up to the year 2025. This is also in recognition of the fact that thriving local economies<br />

should not depend overly on public sector injections of income. These three key sectors, as<br />

well as others highlighted in the table above, are presented in the next sub-section.<br />

Revenue Flows<br />

Figure 36: Main Revenue Flow<br />

First, however, this section turn it lens on another salient features of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

economy – the main revenue flows into and out of the municipal economy. This is captured<br />

graphically in the figure below.<br />

The main sectors are indicated as green blocks within the orange oval, depicts the boundary<br />

of the focal area. The arrows indicate the main source of external income (revenue and<br />

investment) flowing into and leaking out of the economy.<br />

What is striking about this picture is that the bulk of revenue flows directly out of the<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy, as many goods and services are supplied from outside the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

As later sections of this <strong>IDP</strong> will reveal, this reality has led to the <strong>District</strong> prioritizing certain<br />

interventions that will see the retention of revenue within the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Key Economic Sectors


197<br />

As the previous section highlighted, the pre-dominance of certain sectors in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

economy is somewhat contested. This section provides an outlined of the sectors that the<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has decided it is of Strategic importance to its sustained economic<br />

growth. These sectors are mining, agriculture, tourism, retail and trade, manufacturing,<br />

construction, transport and logistics, financial and business services as well as the public<br />

sector. Collectively, these provide a comprehensive picture of the potential inherent in the<br />

municipal economy.<br />

Mining<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> cuts across the north-eastern part of the Bushveld Complex, an<br />

immense geological structure that contains the largest reserves of platinum group metals<br />

(PGM) in the world. PGMs are a family of 6 metals – platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium,<br />

osmium and ruthenium. The first three of these are the main metals used in catalysts. Nickel,<br />

chrome, vanadium, titanium, iron, copper, cobalt, granite and asbestos are some of the other<br />

deposits found in that belt.<br />

Although statistics may vary, most would agree that mining is a key contributor to<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s GGP – and a sector with enormous potential for the immediate future. Modern<br />

mining has been practiced in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> land for well over a century, and typically involved<br />

the exploitation of andalusite, asbestos, chromite and platinum deposits. What is striking<br />

about previous boots of mining activity in the area, however, is how changing commodity<br />

prices affected the opening, closing and occasionally reopening of mines. When prices rose,<br />

new exploration and development took place in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> mining sector. Conversely,<br />

when prices fell, mines in the area were forced to close.<br />

Current Mining Activities<br />

Mining’s contribution to GGP in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is estimated at between 15-20%, depending on<br />

the source of the statistics. Within the <strong>District</strong> itself, the sector contributes most to the GGPs<br />

of Makhuduthamaga (22, 8%) in 2000), Fetakgomo (32, 6% in 2000) and Tubatse (36, 6 in<br />

2000) (Goode, 2006). These figures are likely to have changes in recent years, however.<br />

The major mining activity in the <strong>District</strong> occurs within the Dilokong Corridor, which stretches<br />

largely across Tubatse and Fetakgomo. Elias Motsoaledi, Makhuduthamaga and Ephraim<br />

Mogale have relatively low levels of mining activities (SDM, 2007a).<br />

It is estimated that mining grew at an annual rate of 5.4% from 1996 – 2001 (Goode, 2006),<br />

a comparatively high growth rate which bodes well for the future. According to the<br />

Department of Minerals and Energy, there were 17 operating mines in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> area in 2006 (Goode, 2006). These include a significant number of platinum mines in<br />

the area.<br />

The table below sets out the main existing (operating) and planned platinum mines in the<br />

<strong>District</strong>.


198<br />

Table 81: Operating and Projected Platinum Mines <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

LIST OF MINES IN THE GREATER TUBATSE MUNICIPLAITY<br />

MINE NAME TYPE OF ORE LOCALITY CONTACT<br />

DETAILS<br />

STATUS<br />

Dwarsrivier Chrome Shaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 5300/1 Operating<br />

Helena(Xstrata) Platinum Dithamaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 5000 Operating<br />

/3133<br />

Thorncliff(Xstrata) Platinum Shaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 6750 Operating<br />

Mototolo(Xstrata) Platinum Shaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 6697 Operating<br />

/87<br />

Lion<br />

Platinum Steelpoort 013 <strong>23</strong>0 5064 Operating<br />

Ferrochrome(Xstrata)<br />

Marula Platinum Winnershoek 013 2<strong>14</strong> 6000/ Operating<br />

Farm<br />

013 2<strong>14</strong> 6005<br />

Twickenham Platinum Maotsi 013 <strong>23</strong>1 9127 Operating<br />

Dooringbosch<br />

Chrome Makgemeng 013 <strong>23</strong>0 7001 Operating<br />

(Samancor)<br />

Tubatse F/Cr(Samancor) Chrome Steelpoort 013 <strong>23</strong>0 8335 Operating<br />

Modikwa Platinum M/Shoek 013 <strong>23</strong>0 2044 Operating<br />

Tweefontein(Samancor) Chrome Shaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 7001 Operating<br />

Lannex Chrome Steelpoort 013 <strong>23</strong>0 7001<br />

Two Rivers Platinum Shaga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 2800 Operating<br />

Lwala(Samancor) Chrome Manyaka Prospect<br />

Asa Metals/Dilokong Chrome Maroga 013 <strong>23</strong>0 7785 Operating<br />

Box 169/B Fort<br />

1150<br />

Mkasselmin@A<br />

sametals.Co.Za<br />

Rhino Minerals Andalusite Modubeng 013 216 3100 Operating<br />

Phokathaba Australia Platinum M/Shoek 0795087519 Prospect<br />

Spitzkop Platinum Steelpoort 011 463 0050 Prospect<br />

Grootboom/Boynton Platinum Steelpoort 012 661 4138 Prospect<br />

Annesley Havecraft Andalusite Segorong 013 216 2913 Operating<br />

De Brochen Platinum Operating<br />

Elephant´S River Granite Granite Tjate 083 653 9724 Operating<br />

Mooihoek Chrome Maroga Prospect<br />

Nkwe Platinum M/Shoek Prospect<br />

Sebatakgomo Platinum Tjate Prospect<br />

Saringa Slate K/Tswane Operating<br />

LIST OF MINES IN FETAKGOMO MUNICIPLAITY


199<br />

MINE NAME TYPE OF ORE LOCALITY CONTACT<br />

DETAILS<br />

Elepha is River Granite Pty Granite<br />

Ltd<br />

Sefateng Chrome Chrome 015 291 3961<br />

079495<strong>14</strong>41<br />

Bokoni Platinum Mine Platinum 015 620 000/152<br />

083 4557882<br />

STATUS<br />

Operating<br />

Operating<br />

Operating<br />

ELIAS MOTSOALEDI MUNICIPALITY<br />

Blue Ridge Platinum Groblersdal Non-<br />

Operational<br />

Sheba’s Ridge Platinum Groblersdal Bankable<br />

Feasibility<br />

Study<br />

Maphoch Mine Rossenekal Operating<br />

In addition to the list above, there are also a number of PGM prospects in or around the<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area.<br />

Prospects for the future<br />

Much attention has been given recently to the anticipated platinum mining explosion in<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. There are areas where the new platinum mines are concentrated:<br />

· The Dilokong or Burgersfort/Steelpoort corridor<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has once commissioned an investigation into potential global<br />

demand for the key minerals found in its jurisdiction. The results are presented in the table<br />

below:<br />

Table 82: Market prospects for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> minerals<br />

Mineral Commercial Uses Future Prospects<br />

Chrome and - Stainless steel production - The primary determinant of global<br />

Ferrochrome - Metallurgical applications demand for chrome is stainless<br />

- Refractory, foundry and<br />

chemical industries<br />

steel production (which has grown<br />

by 6% p.a. since 1998)<br />

- There’s currently strong demand<br />

from high Chinese stainless steel<br />

production<br />

- However, excessive supply of<br />

chrome could push down prices in<br />

the future.<br />

Vanadium - Steel making - Because 90% of vanadium


200<br />

Mineral Commercial Uses Future Prospects<br />

misused in steel making, the word<br />

vanadium market is firmly tied to<br />

the steel market<br />

- In 2004, world steel production<br />

exceeded 1 billion tons for the first<br />

time in history.<br />

- Between 2000-2004, steel<br />

production increased by 6% p.a.<br />

globally, especially from China.<br />

- Positive short-term prospects for<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> vanadium, especially<br />

given potential Chinese demand.<br />

- A possible threat could arise if<br />

procedures seek substitute if<br />

vanadium prices become too high.<br />

Platinum<br />

Group Metals<br />

- Automotive exhaust<br />

catalyst (auto catalyst)<br />

- Other Industrial uses<br />

(other catalysts, turbine<br />

blades, Biomedical uses,<br />

coins, PC Hard Disks,<br />

etc.)<br />

- Jewellery production<br />

Limestone - Used in cement and steel<br />

making<br />

Dimension<br />

stone<br />

- Red and Black granite<br />

used in home décor /<br />

architecture<br />

- Because of the nature of its<br />

commercial usage, global demand<br />

is strongly linked to environmental<br />

standards re vehicle emissions<br />

- Demand for PGMs has continued<br />

to grow over the years, however –<br />

and there is currently a healthy<br />

outlook for this type of mining<br />

- Jewellery demand is also expected<br />

to rise<br />

- Increased construction activity will<br />

result in sustained demand for<br />

cement<br />

- Hence, there’s a positive outlook<br />

for limestone mining in<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

- World demand for dimension stone<br />

has been growing steadily<br />

- However, the South African market<br />

isn’t faring well because of<br />

currency depreciation and<br />

unpredictable demand (because<br />

architects choose different<br />

finishes)<br />

Coal - Energy - There are better sources outside<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> that currently supply<br />

the domestic and international<br />

markets


201<br />

Mineral Commercial Uses Future Prospects<br />

- Hence, coal mining isn’t a viable<br />

prospect for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

- However, there’s limited potential<br />

for the extraction of coal bed<br />

methane as an energy source for<br />

the region (needs further<br />

investigation, through)<br />

Source: adapted from Goode (2006) Scoping paper on the mining sector in the<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

There are, in summary, a number of factors that could affect <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s mining industry<br />

negatively in the future. These include drops in global demands for the minerals produced in<br />

the area, continued water scarcity in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> and the increasing mechanization of<br />

platinum mining industry in the future. The latter will affect the potential employment<br />

opportunities generated by mining industry in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, regardless of whether the area<br />

contains significant mineral deposits or not.<br />

Beneficiation Opportunities and Value Chain Analysis<br />

It is important to note that PGM ores are low in value (possibly around 30 cents/kg). it is also<br />

difficult to extract the valuable metals from them without suitable and expensive equipment.<br />

Some estimate place the value of the ordinary (just mined) platinum ore at only 13% of the<br />

refined material (Goode and Granville, 2006).<br />

At present, there is no base-metal or platinum smelter in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area. The nearest<br />

smelter is Amplats’ Polokwane Smelter. Recent research done for the <strong>District</strong>’s 2025<br />

Development Strategy included interviews with key mining companies on the possibility of<br />

them building smelter within the <strong>District</strong>. This was based on research projections that the<br />

total PGM production in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> in 2015 would be 2, 900, 00 oz per annum – a figure<br />

that would justify the installation of a new smelter in the area (Goode and Granville, 2006). It<br />

would appear, however, that most mining companies were not planning to build a new<br />

smelter in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area.<br />

Job Creation<br />

Since the mid-1980, the mining labour market has changed significantly as the sector has<br />

become more knowledge-intensive. As a result, overall mining employment has been<br />

decreasing gradually. Goode and Granville (2006) estimate that platinum mining in the<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> will generate the following jobs until 2015:<br />

Table 83: Projected employment in platinum mining in/near <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>


202<br />

Production (K0oz)<br />

Employees<br />

2010 2,028 36,427<br />

2011 2,266 39,252<br />

2012 2,495 41,666<br />

<strong>2013</strong> 2,597 41,806<br />

20<strong>14</strong> 2,693 41,786<br />

2015 2,856 42,730<br />

Source: Goode, R and Granville, A (2006). Mining expansion and employment in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> land: Expectations and<br />

Impediments.<br />

The agriculture sector is an important contributor to employment, but a relatively marginal<br />

contributor to the aggregate GGP, estimated at 9, 7% (SDM, 2007a). According to farmers in<br />

the area, the main reason why the sector doesn’t contribute more to GGP is because of<br />

water scarcity. Other reasons could include the combined effects of land claims, which<br />

creates uncertainty and discourages further investment, as well as the low growth of global<br />

commodities.<br />

Agriculture in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> is a mixture of both commercial and subsistence<br />

farming. As indicated in the earlier spatial profile, subsistence farming tends to dominate<br />

land use in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Commercial agriculture in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> tends to be concentrated in two areas:<br />

- The South-Western part of the <strong>District</strong> (near Groblersdal and Marble Hall)<br />

- The Eastern section of the <strong>District</strong> (near Burgersfort and Ohrigstad)<br />

Number of jobs created through LED Initiatives in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>, as part of a<br />

provincial report<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Number of jobs<br />

created through<br />

LED initiatives<br />

09/10<br />

Number of<br />

jobs created<br />

through LED<br />

initiatives<br />

10/11<br />

Number of<br />

jobs created<br />

through LED<br />

initiatives<br />

11/12<br />

Vhembe 57 2615 918<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 1946 4536 9038<br />

Capricorn 2126 3127 6522


203<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Number of jobs<br />

created through<br />

LED initiatives<br />

09/10<br />

Number of<br />

jobs created<br />

through LED<br />

initiatives<br />

10/11<br />

Number of<br />

jobs created<br />

through LED<br />

initiatives<br />

11/12<br />

Mopani 4<strong>23</strong>3 7171 (Giyani<br />

excluded)<br />

1761<br />

Waterberg <strong>14</strong><strong>23</strong> 1215 643<br />

PROVINCIAL<br />

AGGREGATE<br />

9785 18 664 18 882<br />

Source: Limpopo Provincial Government Report <strong>2013</strong>, submitted to national COGTA Department<br />

Commercial agriculture<br />

Over the past 5 to 10 years, farmers in the area have faced mounted difficulties with falling<br />

commodity prices and rising input costs. Despite this, agriculture’s contribution to GGP<br />

continues to be roughly 10% and, in 2001, provided 16% of the formal employment within<br />

the <strong>District</strong> (Womiwu Rural Development, 2006a).<br />

There are two major areas of commercial cultivation:<br />

- The Loskop scheme<br />

- The Ohrigstad scheme<br />

(a1) The Loskop scheme<br />

The towns of Groblersdal and Marble Hall are found in the Loskop Valley. The commercial<br />

agricultural schemes in the valley are serviced by the Loskop Dam, built in 1938 especially<br />

for this purpose. In addition to the Loskop scheme, there are 5 smaller schemes within the<br />

Loskop agriculture area:<br />

- Moosrivier scheme<br />

- Hereford scheme<br />

- Olifants River scheme<br />

- Elands River scheme


204<br />

- Selons River scheme<br />

Collectively, these contribute significantly to commercial agriculture in the area. The past 10<br />

years have placed Loskop farmers under increasing pressure as arising input costs, a<br />

stronger local currency, lower commodity prices and external competition have all taken their<br />

toll. One of the responses on the part of local farmers has been to diversify the crops they<br />

produce. The collapse of the once lucrative tobacco industry has also pressured farmers in<br />

the area to look at different options. As a result, there has been a growing emphasis placed<br />

on establishing permanent crops, such as citrus and table grapes, in the area.<br />

Main crops in Loskop<br />

Tobacco, Wheat, Cotton, Soya beans, Citrus, Paprika, Pumpkin, Peas, Commercial<br />

vegetables, Seed maize, Commercial maize, Table grapes, Dry beans, Watermelons.<br />

The <strong>District</strong> currently has a competitive advantage in a number of crops, including table<br />

grapes, citrus and vegetables for processing (Womiwu Rural Development, 2006b). This can<br />

be maintained if the <strong>District</strong> promotes processing and other value-adding activities for these<br />

products.<br />

Emerging and Small-Scale Agriculture<br />

Almost 70% of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> farmers are subsistence farmers. This group of farmers<br />

engages extensively in both livestock and crop farming.<br />

In the middle-1990s, three Farmers Support Programmes were providing assistance to<br />

about 16,000 small-scale maize farmers in Phokoane, Ndebele and Sterkspruit. These<br />

programmes have been discontinued (Wmiwu) Rural Development, 2006a) and subsistence<br />

agricultural production in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> has generally dropped significantly (DoA, 2006).<br />

The two areas with the highest potential for small-scale farmers are the higher rainfall<br />

dryland areas, as well as the Olifants River Irrigation Scheme. The latter consist of 42<br />

government-assisted schemes allocated to approximately 3,000 farmers, and has been<br />

identified as part of the Limpopo DoA’s Revitalization of smallholder schemes. The table<br />

below captures the schemes that will be revitalized under the initiative in the first 2 years:<br />

The future of agriculture in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is however, impeded by a number of factors. These<br />

include water scarcity, distorted land ownership patterns, a growing number of land claims,<br />

Limited support services and inadequate infrastructure and services. The huge disparities<br />

between the commercial and subsistence farming worlds may also eventually cause some<br />

social tension. The other area of potential tension lies in conflicting social and economic<br />

demands for water, an increasingly scarce resource in the district. It is a tension that will<br />

need to be mediated through future <strong>IDP</strong> processes.


205<br />

Despite these potential difficulties, opportunities abound for agriculture in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, and<br />

the sector is likely to play a dominant role in the district’s forthcoming 2025 Strategy. It is<br />

also a critical element of provincial economic strategy.<br />

Agriculture and the LEGDP<br />

There are two identified agricultural cluster within the LEGDP:<br />

- Red meat cluster<br />

- Horticulture cluster<br />

Both have implications for future development in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>. The red meat<br />

cluster could be developed best in the Phokoane/Ndebele area, and the horticultural cluster<br />

in the Groblersdal/Ephraim Mogale area.<br />

Agricultural activities with the most potential in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Recent research done for the <strong>District</strong>’s 2025 Strategy identified 6 areas that held the most<br />

potential for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> agriculture. These are:<br />

- Crops associated with the bio-fuels industry (soya, sorghum, maize, groundnuts,<br />

sunflower, etc.)<br />

- Dryland farmer support programme focusing on maize, sorghum and guar<br />

- Farmer support programme focusing on cattle and goat farming<br />

- General farmer support programmes looking at the unutilized capacity of small<br />

community projects in the <strong>District</strong><br />

- Commercial and horticultural production, especially in terms of cluster development<br />

in the high potential areas of Groblersdal/Ephraim Mogale and<br />

Ohrigstad/Watervals - Spekboom (focused on value-adding activities (Womiwu Rural<br />

Development, 2006b).<br />

Tourism<br />

Nationally, there has been a major shift in the tourism sector away from strategies that rely<br />

on physical attributes towards those that emphasize competitive behavior. This notion is<br />

taken forward in the key provincial documents, such as the LEGDP and the provincial<br />

Tourism Plan, which call for the development of spatially concentrated cluster that have<br />

unique competitive success in a particularly field.<br />

Within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> context, a number of clusters have been identified by Provincial<br />

Tourism Strategy as offering significant tourism potential. These include:<br />

- Themed routes for special interest groups


206<br />

- Family recreation for neighbours and local residents<br />

- Business tourism<br />

- Agri-tourism<br />

Current tourism infrastructure<br />

Tourism has been identified as one of the major growth sectors in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />

The <strong>District</strong>’s Tourism Strategy that was adopted in 2005 indicates that there are an<br />

estimated 84 accommodation facilities offering 2.627 beds throughout <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. The<br />

sector also employs about 962 persons.<br />

Table 84: Accommodation facilities in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Municipal area No of No of Occupancy Turnover Staff<br />

facilities beds rate (%)<br />

employed<br />

Tubatse 20 1,278 67 47,200,000 432<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 24 577 59 20,200,000 222<br />

Ephraim Mogale 29 677 54 <strong>23</strong>,000,000 260<br />

Fetakgomo 1 20 n/a 200,000 12<br />

Makhuduthamaga 6 75 62 2,600,000 36<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 81 2,627 62 93 200,000 962<br />

Source: SDM (2005). <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Tourism Development Strategy-Status Quo Report<br />

The potential of this sector could be more fully exploited if multiplier effects are taken more<br />

advantage of.<br />

· Flagship Tourism Projects<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> area has a number of potential tourism attractions, some of which have<br />

been captured as flagship projects under the district’s new tourism plan. The area hosts the<br />

scenic Flag Boshielo Dam area, for example, as well as the adjoining Schuinsdraal nature<br />

Reserve, Potlake Nature Reserve and the Maleoskop resort and conservancy.<br />

· Tourism Anchor Projects in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

The <strong>District</strong>’s Tourism Development Strategy recommends the following 5 anchor projects:<br />

- Flag Boshielo Cluster<br />

- Tjate Heritage site<br />

- Main Entrance gate and route Development<br />

- Klein Drakensberg Escarpment<br />

- De Hoop Dam to Mapoch Recreation Complex<br />

Future Growth


207<br />

According to the <strong>District</strong>’s LED Strategy reviewed in 2007 (SDM, 2007a), tourism in<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> is still in its infancy with limited offerings and low service standards. It does,<br />

however, have the potential to diversify the economy in a sustainable and labour intensive<br />

manner. These niches need investigation and development of destinations, into compelling<br />

attractions. Growth in tourism is currently driven mainly by business visitors in the public and<br />

mining sector activities and agriculture provides an opportunity to grow the sector creatively<br />

with unique attractions.<br />

Recent research done for the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s 2025 Strategy also made a few<br />

predictions about the employment-generating potential of the tourism sector in the area. The<br />

employment potential of some of the key project is captured in the table below.<br />

At present, however, there are very few institutions serving the tourism industry in<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. These include; The Roosenekal Tourism Publicity association is found within<br />

Elias Motsoaledi <strong>Municipality</strong> and, amongst other things, stages the Arum Lily festival. Other<br />

role-players connected to the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> tourism industry include the Limpopo Department<br />

of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism (LEDET), and Limpopo<br />

Tourism Agency (LTA).<br />

The future growth of the tourism industry is further impeded by infrastructural and service<br />

delivery constraints in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. These include poor roads, telecommunications,<br />

electricity and water supply.<br />

Retail and Wholesale Trade and Services<br />

According to Stats SA data presented earlier in this section the trade and Service is also a<br />

major contributor to GGP (17%). The sector has shown a significant increase in its<br />

contribution to the aggregate GGP. It has registered a high growth rate and remains a<br />

relatively large component of the local economy. The sector responds predominantly to local<br />

markets. Growth in these sectors could be explained by increased local spending power as a<br />

result of growth in the public and mining sectors.<br />

Formal trade is mostly restricted to the major town such as Marble Hall, Groblersdal and<br />

Burgersfort, while informal trade takes place throughout the rural parts of the <strong>District</strong>,<br />

including the numerous villages.<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Manufacturing is a relatively small sector within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy. The most<br />

common manufacturing activities include the making of sand bricks, windows, doors and<br />

steel frames. These activities respond to local demand from the infrastructural development<br />

associated with housing projects, roads rehabilitation, as well as agriculture and mining<br />

activities.


208<br />

There is potential for growth in manufacturing if effective links are created to exploit<br />

opportunities resulting from the mining and public sector infrastructure spending.<br />

Construction<br />

The construction sector is also a relatively small, but important, contributor to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s<br />

GGP. It is linked to development within all the other sectors of the economy. This includes<br />

the demand for the construction of public sector infrastructure 9housing, roads, provision of<br />

basic services, the De Hoop dam and the pipeline network) – a trend that is large and<br />

growing. Most construction work is currently sourced from outside the <strong>District</strong>. This poses<br />

the challenge for local residents to either become competitive enough or partner with already<br />

the challenge for local residents to either become competitive enough or partner with already<br />

competitive enough or partner with already competitive contractors to share in this growth.<br />

Transport, Logistics and Communications<br />

The transport, logistics and communications sector is becoming significantly more important<br />

in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, especially with gradual increase in activities of other economic sectors. The<br />

anticipated expansion in mining, for instance, offers tremendous opportunity for passenger<br />

transport and material. Similarly, public sector infrastructural development also demands the<br />

movement of huge amounts of material and people.<br />

Financial, Business and Real Estate Services<br />

The financial and business services sector is an important contributor when analyzed in the<br />

context of the <strong>District</strong> economy. The contributor is between 10 to 12%. It is also important<br />

because it facilitates the development of other economic sectors in the area. At present, the<br />

majority of these services are concentrated within the economic nodes of Groblersdal and<br />

marble Hall town.<br />

Public Sector<br />

The government sector employs 16% of the total <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> population, provides public<br />

services and invests in development work. Besides the employment created, income<br />

generated and spent in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>, the public sector also has a key role to play in the<br />

economy in the way decisions are taken. The delivery of the public infrastructure budget for<br />

example, could be prioritized to unlock economic potential, in the absence of which,<br />

opportunities could be wasted. However, public expenditure in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> far exceeds its<br />

ability to raise tax revenue. The inference is that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s public spending is actually<br />

mainly paid for by the rest of the country.<br />

Development corridors in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>


209<br />

A number of development corridors have the potential to promote economic growth within<br />

the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> (SDM, undated, b). These are described below.<br />

Dilokong Corridor<br />

The Dilokong (Platinum) Primary Corridor is an extremely important corridor to both<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> and the province. It correlates largely with the R37 road, which runs from<br />

Polokwane through Lebowakgomo to Burgersfort.<br />

The Dilokong corridor is characterized by booming mining activities alongside its trajectory.<br />

Projected mining expansion in the area is likely to boost the importance of this initiative as<br />

well. Tubatse benefits the most from developments in this corridor, with lesser benefits<br />

accruing to Fetakgomo as well.<br />

The Dilokong Corridor also encompasses a number of growth points including Atok (within<br />

Fetakgomo), Mecklenburg and Burgersfort. The Burgersfort cluster includes a provincial<br />

growth point (Burgersfort), <strong>District</strong> growth point (Steelpoort) and municipal growth point<br />

(Driekop). The remaining settlements which forms part of the Burgersfort cluster, have been<br />

classified as population concentration points. These settlements are also important in the<br />

development of the area mainly because they have residential development potential for the<br />

mines (SDM, undated, b).<br />

The N11 Corridor<br />

The primary N11 corridor runs from Botswana through Potgietersrus down to Groblersdal<br />

and onwards to Middleburg on the western side of the <strong>District</strong>. It serves as a major transport<br />

route in the western part of the <strong>District</strong>, particularly for transporting agricultural produce. The<br />

road conditions along this corridor are fairly poor, however.<br />

Marble Hall and Groblersdal fall within the N11 corridor. These towns have also been<br />

classified as provincial growth points because of their important service function to the<br />

surrounding communities and their linkages to these communities as well as agricultural<br />

sector (SDM, undated, b).<br />

Jane Furse Corridor<br />

The mainly residential development on the road between Lebowakgomo via Ga-Masemola<br />

and Ga-Phaahla to Jane Furse and Glen Cowie/Phokwane can be classified as a secondary<br />

development corridor within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. This corridor does not form part of SDI route, but<br />

is a corridor in terms of the nature and extent of the large population concentration in the<br />

area.<br />

This secondary corridor can play a significant role in the development of mining. It extends<br />

from Burgersfort via Steelpoort to Stoffberg. A number of mining activities are taking place at


210<br />

the moment along the corridor. Proper infrastructure will be required to facilitate mining<br />

expansion, however. Proper development of this corridor will stimulate economic<br />

development of the surrounding areas. It will mostly cater for the transportation of goods and<br />

services.<br />

Other Corridors<br />

The following tertiary corridors where identified within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>:<br />

- From Burgersfort to Penge<br />

- From Marble Hall to Siyabuswa<br />

- From Groblersdal to Stoffberg<br />

- From Marble Hall the Olifants to Atok<br />

- From Jane Furse to Nchabeleng<br />

(SDM, undated)<br />

These corridors have various clusters, which are primarily classified as population<br />

concentration points, including municipal growth points. They also connect various villages<br />

with different growth points. They are strategically distributed and links well with the primary<br />

and secondary corridor identified above. Some of the identified tertiary corridors need<br />

upgrading in order to stimulate economic growth in these clustered villages and municipal<br />

growth points.<br />

Local Economic Development Snapshots per <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Each local <strong>Municipality</strong>’s economy within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> has distinctive<br />

characteristics of its own which collectively contribute to the overall economic make-up of the<br />

area. This section presents a snapshot of these local economies.<br />

Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Greater Tubatse is a strong economic centre within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>, primarily<br />

because of its mining sector. Mining is indeed the major source of employment and<br />

economic growth in Tubatse. Minerals found here include platinum, chrome, vanadium,<br />

andalusite, slica and magnetite. The mining sector is currently growing rapidly in the area<br />

and the town (Burgersfort) is now one of the fastest growing towns in the country.<br />

Retail, trade, services and agriculture also contribute to the Greater Tubatse economy and<br />

are major employers. Agricultural products cultivated in this area include citrus, vegetables,<br />

corn and maize. Livestock farming include cattle, goats and game.<br />

Makhuduthamaga local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

The Makhuduthamaga <strong>Municipality</strong> promotes agriculture, tourism and mining as the key<br />

growth sectors. There are number of mining exploration exercise that are taking place within


211<br />

the municipality. If mining does indeed prove feasible, it will have an added impetus on the<br />

creation of much needed jobs in particular and the growth of the economy in general.<br />

The decision to locate the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> in Jane Furse will provide substantial growth<br />

impetus, perhaps at the cost of Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong>. Furthermore, the<br />

agricultural and tourism potential of the municipality have yet to be exploited fully. At the<br />

moment limited forms of agricultural and tourism activities are taking place.<br />

Ephraim Mogale Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

The availability of irrigation water from the closely situated Loskop dam makes Ephraim<br />

Mogale a thriving agricultural area. Ephraim Mogale is known for its extensive irrigation<br />

farming which includes cotton (Ephraim Mogale has one of the biggest Cotton production<br />

Centres in the Southern Hemisphere), wheat, citrus, table grapes and vegetables. The<br />

extensive vegetable cultivation provides for the Gauteng market and national retailers. Citrus<br />

and table grapes are exported to the European market.<br />

Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Fetakgomo Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is blessed with mineral deposits, such as platinum, of which<br />

the public sector makes the largest contributions to the local economy. It is situated in the<br />

fertile soil alongside the rivers of Lepellane, offering great agricultural potential which is<br />

currently underutilized. This municipality is surrounded by beautiful mountains and has rich<br />

cultural history with potential to become tourist attractions.<br />

Elias Motsoaledi Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Groblersdal is the centre of a progressive farming community because of the town’s<br />

fortunate location in the Olifants River irrigation area below Loskop Dam. Intensive<br />

agricultural activities (under 5 irrigation scheme) cover a total surface area of 28 000 ha. The<br />

gross agricultural production of the district is estimated at R250 million per annum. The<br />

agricultural produce includes grapes, wheat, tobacco, maize, soya beans, citrus fruits, cotton<br />

and vegetables.<br />

Table 85: Priority sectors of local municipality<br />

Local<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Agriculture and<br />

agroprocessing<br />

Mining Constructio<br />

n<br />

Touris<br />

m<br />

Other<br />

sector<br />

Public<br />

sector<br />

s<br />

Elias Motsoaledi X X X X<br />

Fetakgomo X X<br />

X X X<br />

(Platinum)<br />

Makhuduthamaga X X<br />

X X X<br />

(concrete)<br />

(retail)<br />

Ephraim Mogale X X X X


212<br />

Tubatse X X<br />

(various)<br />

Source: SDM (2006b) – Results of LED rapid appraisal<br />

X<br />

X<br />

Competitive and Comparative advantages<br />

For the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy to grow sustainably, revenue and investment flows must<br />

increase, preferably from external markets. It is therefore necessary to determine which<br />

external markets <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>-based enterprises can complete in profitably and sustainably.<br />

It is also important to understand the nature of competitive advantages and disadvantages in<br />

these markets, and to recognize which factors are critical to success and which factors still<br />

constrain the relevant sector’s performance.<br />

The <strong>District</strong> is currently exploring 5 key markets that offer viable potential to drive future<br />

economic growth in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. These are described briefly below, and their competitive<br />

advantages and disadvantages are highlighted.<br />

Platinum and Chrome Ore Mining<br />

Prospects for the sustained growth and competiveness of platinum and chrome ore are<br />

extremely healthy, as previous sections in this chapter have attested. The potential for propoor<br />

growth is also solid, mainly in enterprises supplying goods and services to the mines.<br />

Main market: Gauteng and international mining houses<br />

Supplies and outsourced services to local mines<br />

Currently, prospects for sustained growth and competitiveness are healthy for the next 20<br />

Years¹. The potential for pro-poor growth is reasonable, and mainly in enterprises supplying<br />

goods and services to the mines. Employment in these services and production are labour<br />

intensive. The growth in these sectors will also contribute to grow in other sector, such as<br />

retail, property and transport.<br />

Main market: Platinum and Chrome mining cluster on the Dilokong Corridor.<br />

Table 86: Main sectors: Services, Transport & Logistics, Construction, Manufacturing, property<br />

Market Agriculture, Agro-processing and Tourism<br />

Competitive advantage<br />

Competitive disadvantages<br />

Demand conditions:<br />

- There are more than forty types of<br />

services that the mine could source<br />

providers can be established or<br />

attracted to operate from Fetakgomo.<br />

- The opportunities include transport of<br />

material in the mine, out to the<br />

- Few local support industries<br />

- Shortages of skills<br />

- Low levels of education


213<br />

smelter, cleaning services, labour<br />

broker, maintenance of plant and<br />

machinery, garden services including<br />

the supply of meat and vegetables.<br />

- The mines are willing to source<br />

locally provided competitive suppliers<br />

that can be developed.<br />

- Risk should be managed – mine<br />

operations must not be disrupted by<br />

supplier/ service provider<br />

- Most procurement takes place from<br />

head office outside SDM.<br />

- Uncertainty about land availability for<br />

expansion: surface mining rights<br />

housing<br />

- Ability to anticipate and manage<br />

community expectations related to<br />

development<br />

- Relationship challenges with<br />

neighboring communities<br />

Supporting Industries<br />

- LIBSA<br />

- LIMDEV<br />

- Supportive Local Government<br />

Locational factors<br />

- Close proximity to the large scale<br />

mining activities – mine as a market<br />

- Access to basic services in growth<br />

points<br />

- Some existing services providers<br />

- Some existing facilities and<br />

infrastructure<br />

Source: SDM (2007b). Local Economic Development (LED) strategy<br />

Fruit, Vegetables, Cotton, Meat and Beneficiation<br />

Agriculture is labour intensive and creates employment. Prospects for sustained growth and<br />

competitiveness are good if existing constraints can be dealt with effectively. The potential<br />

for pro-poor growth is high, especially if markets can be made more easily accessible for<br />

example, establishment of a local agro-processing plant that sources from emerging<br />

farmers. Agriculture only makes a marginal contribution to growth in other sectors.<br />

Despite the water constraint in many areas, other production areas with irrigation are under<br />

utilized for various reasons. The sector does not have expertise, experience and market<br />

linkages to grow and create many jobs. The climate and location offers competitive<br />

advantage i.e. speed to market and the long duration of the warm season.<br />

Table 87: Main markets: National Retailers, EU Agents & Chain stores, Gauteng<br />

Fresh Produce Markets - Sector: Agriculture, Agro-processing


2<strong>14</strong><br />

Competitive Advantages<br />

Competitive Disadvantages<br />

Establishment commercial farming sector - Subsistence level farming persist<br />

Advanced citrus sector serving international<br />

markets<br />

- Oversupply in commodity markets<br />

pushes price down, affording low<br />

margins<br />

Markets for livestock: Mines, Gauteng<br />

Established links to the Gauteng, National<br />

- Farmers have little to no bargaining<br />

power.<br />

Retailers and EU markets<br />

- Access to markets limited<br />

- Emerging farmers especially in<br />

Demand Conditions:<br />

remote areas<br />

Rand has weekend recently, contributing to<br />

price competitiveness in export market<br />

- Limited access to suppliers in remote<br />

areas<br />

Supporting Industries<br />

- Limited emerging/establishment<br />

partnerships<br />

Availability of technical skills<br />

- Ineffective technical support to<br />

emerging farmers<br />

Locational Factors:<br />

- Mistrust by business of government<br />

- Land ownership: current regulations<br />

- Proximity to Gauteng Market<br />

discourages investment<br />

- Close to the mine as a market - Labour regulations discourage<br />

- Vast expanses of unutilized land with fulltime<br />

agriculture potential<br />

employment to the detriment of both<br />

- Availability of water (near rivers and<br />

the farmer and the farm worker<br />

irrigation schemes)<br />

- 75% of the arable land in SDM is<br />

- Water supply to improve, increased<br />

capacity of Flag Boshielo and the<br />

under<br />

unsettled claim (850 claims)<br />

new<br />

De Hoop dams<br />

- Agricultural expansion is water<br />

constrained in many places<br />

- Underutilized existing irrigation - Shortage of certain skills<br />

schemes<br />

- Low levels of education<br />

- Fertile soil<br />

- Limited electricity supply to remote<br />

- Favourable climate conditions<br />

areas<br />

- Long seasons for production<br />

- Limited access to telecommunications<br />

- Existing skills<br />

infrastructure<br />

- Potential for larger scale<br />

- Risk associated with periods of<br />

commercialization – variety of drought<br />

products<br />

- Limited supply of veterinary services<br />

- Entrepreneurs with ideas and capital in<br />

outlying areas<br />

- Some areas suffer from erosion and<br />

overgrazing<br />

Source: SDM (2007b). Local Economic Development (LED) Strategy<br />

Business and Leisure Tourism


215<br />

In lieu of the high dependency of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy on the public and mining<br />

sectors, other sectors need to be developed in the longer term to diversify the economy. This<br />

will render it less vulnerable when the mining boom subsides. Tourism is one sector where<br />

competitive advantage can be developed and maintained over time.<br />

The short term demand especially, whilst the mining expansion takes place, presents an<br />

opportunity to create appropriate facilities that meet the market demand and will be<br />

sustainable. The current tourism sector is not yet competitive due to infrastructure<br />

development of new access roads and key tourism attractions. The potential for pr-poor<br />

growth is limited in the short term but will increase with time. Tourism is typically labour<br />

intensive and will have positive spin-offs for other sectors such as housing, retail and golf<br />

course development following tourism investment.<br />

Main markets: Local and Foreign Tourism travelling mainly from Gauteng<br />

Table 88: Tourism Sector: Accommodation and other tourism service providers<br />

Competitive Advantages<br />

Competitive Disadvantages<br />

Consist mainly of number of small lodges,<br />

guesthouses, game farms, backpacker<br />

establishments. Dedicated restaurants<br />

consist mainly of fast food franchise outlets.<br />

Demand conditions:<br />

- Largest demand for ‘business tourism<br />

- visitors to the public, mining and<br />

agriculture sectors<br />

- Unmet need for accommodation from<br />

mine and municipal visitors to areas<br />

other than Marble Hall, Groblersdal<br />

and Burgersfort<br />

Supporting Industries:<br />

- Proactive Government Support for<br />

Tourism in the form of:<br />

- R60 million from province, National<br />

Dept. Environmental Affairs and<br />

Tourism and National Dept. of Water<br />

Affairs<br />

- Political Support<br />

- Support from the Magoshi<br />

- Key tourist attractions / heritage sites<br />

still not developed to competitive<br />

standard<br />

- Poor quality of service and skills,<br />

especially in the hospitality sector<br />

- Limited understanding of target<br />

markets<br />

- Fragmentation and poor cooperation<br />

in the tourism sector<br />

- Poorly maintained roads and<br />

underdeveloped road infrastructure<br />

- Shortage of skills in the broad tourism<br />

sector<br />

- Landownership constraint in tribal<br />

areas<br />

- Development land/site availability /<br />

ownership = investment risk<br />

- Backlog in basic infrastructure<br />

(including electricity) in rural and<br />

remote areas<br />

- Limited access to telecommunication<br />

infrastructure<br />

Locational factors:<br />

- Flag Boshielo Dam/Schuinsdraal<br />

Game Reserve initiative – Planned<br />

Big 5 reserve, malaria free, only


216<br />

2hours from Gauteng, housing & golf<br />

estates<br />

- Variety of agricultural education<br />

attractions<br />

- Picturesque area with potential for<br />

many activities related to the<br />

landscape<br />

- Rich cultural historical area with<br />

many heritage sites<br />

Source: SDM (2007b). Local Economic Development (LED) Strategy<br />

Public Sector Infrastructure Spending<br />

The Public Sector investment and service provision in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> will continue to grow as<br />

long as the <strong>District</strong> remains a Presidential priority node. Two district potentials arise that LED<br />

can tap into:<br />

- Directing, shifting such investment to support the LED strategic priorities to unlock<br />

economic potential more effectively<br />

- Increasing the local private and emerging sector capacity to deliver such services, to<br />

win a larger share of these local contracts<br />

- The public sector market includes work contracted by: Department of Water Affairs<br />

and Forestry, Department of Public Works, Road Agency Limpopo, Department of<br />

Housing and Department of Provincial and Local Government (MIG)<br />

expenditure.<br />

Table 89: Local Suppliers, Construction, transport & logistics, Services, Manufacturing,<br />

property market, Tourism<br />

Competitive advantages<br />

Competitive Disadvantages<br />

Public sector services providers<br />

Demand conditions<br />

- SDM is a presidential development<br />

node and qualifies proportionately for<br />

more state development funding<br />

- Massive investment in upgrading the<br />

SDM infrastructure is planned – this<br />

includes building of dams, reticulating<br />

water and waste, roads, housing<br />

development, electricity and<br />

telecommunication<br />

- Quality of infrastructure not to be<br />

comprised by awarding contracts to<br />

underperformers<br />

Supporting Industries<br />

- Municipal planners, Engineers,<br />

Building inspectors<br />

- Supportive Local Government<br />

Mostly external SDM<br />

- Quality of work<br />

- Poor quality control<br />

- Poor cooperation between<br />

established<br />

and emerging contractors<br />

- Limited experience and credibility of<br />

local construction enterprises<br />

- Limited tendering skills<br />

- Limited expertise to manage big<br />

contracts<br />

- Municipalities are not accessing<br />

maximum of infrastructure grants<br />

- Local development priorities are not<br />

linked effectively to <strong>District</strong> and<br />

provincial priorities<br />

- Local development priorities not


217<br />

- Qualify for MIG, EPWP, … grant<br />

funding<br />

- LIBSA provides training support<br />

Locational factors<br />

- Cost advantage of local proximity<br />

- Local know how<br />

- Diversity of construction skills<br />

- Contractors willing to work together<br />

- Earth moving equipment<br />

- Building materials available<br />

linked effectively to public sector<br />

support agencies<br />

- Locals not aware of all the existing<br />

opportunities / potential projects<br />

- Limited availability of finance for<br />

construction sector<br />

- Shortage of engineers<br />

- Shortage of technical skills<br />

- Low levels of education<br />

Source: SDM (2007b). Local Economic Development (LED) Strategy<br />

Tourism<br />

The table below is the result of a rapid appraisal process conducted in November 2006 as<br />

part of the <strong>District</strong>’s LED Strategy formulation (SDM, 2006b). It sets out the main local<br />

constraints to growth that municipal practitioners themselves identified.<br />

Table 90: Constraints to economic growth in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Land Roads Skills Other<br />

Elias Motsoaledi<br />

Land Ownership<br />

Fetakgomo<br />

Unblock the land<br />

constraints<br />

Makhuduthamaga<br />

Access to land Delay<br />

in proclamation of<br />

Jane Furse as a<br />

township.<br />

Fragmented release<br />

of land which leads<br />

to distorted planning<br />

Groblersdal to<br />

Roosenekal (33700)<br />

Groblersdal to<br />

Bronkhorstspruit<br />

(R25) The road from<br />

Groblersdal via<br />

Roosenekal to the<br />

Mapoch Caves<br />

needs upgrading<br />

Upgrade D4190<br />

Road to Atok Mine.<br />

Build a road from<br />

R37 to <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

cultural village<br />

Roads to Manchi<br />

Masemola tourist<br />

site, various access<br />

roads to heritage<br />

sites and to link<br />

municipal sub-growth<br />

points and nodes of<br />

neighbouring<br />

municipalities<br />

Support emerging<br />

farmers to gain<br />

commercial farming<br />

skills<br />

Emerging farmers to<br />

gain commercial<br />

farming skills and lift<br />

them to a<br />

commercial level<br />

Infrastructure<br />

development around<br />

Mapoch cave<br />

Infrastructure e.g.<br />

roads, water and<br />

electricity for mines<br />

Remove blockages<br />

to investment in<br />

housing<br />

Funding for feasibility<br />

studies


218<br />

Ephraim Mogale<br />

Make more land<br />

available (land audit)<br />

Tubatse<br />

No readily available<br />

land for<br />

development.<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> does not<br />

own sufficient land to<br />

stimulate economic<br />

growth in Burgersfort<br />

and Steelpoort. Land<br />

is owned by private<br />

sector and is sold at<br />

a high price.<br />

Upgrade roads<br />

starting with<br />

reconstruction of part<br />

of the N11<br />

Major roads needs to<br />

be upgraded – R37,<br />

R555<br />

Source: SDM (2006b) – Results of LED rapid appraisal<br />

Supporting emerging<br />

farmers to gain<br />

commercial farming<br />

skills strengthening<br />

of Tompi Seleka<br />

Agricultural College<br />

Capacity Building for<br />

Small Contractors<br />

Facilitate Access to<br />

Technical Skills and<br />

accreditation<br />

Determine the key<br />

factors that<br />

discourage<br />

employment of<br />

permanent farm<br />

workers Remove<br />

municipal capacity<br />

bottlenecks to<br />

infrastructure<br />

development. Flag<br />

Boshielo concession<br />

and property<br />

Development<br />

Mining supply park<br />

De Hoop Dam<br />

(water)<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> seems poised to experience a major boom in platinum mining in the near future<br />

– a move that will grow its economy substantially if the <strong>District</strong> exploits these opportunities<br />

effectively. Agriculture and tourism also offer potential dividends. However, the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

economy currently has a number of unhealthy features which could undermine economic<br />

development efforts in the future.<br />

Table 91: Employment levels<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Employed Unemployed Unemployment<br />

rate<br />

1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />

Ephraim Mogale 11207 15632 18350 10005 12721 12944 47,2 44,9 41,4<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 19696 20155 32203 <strong>23</strong>862 24027 24175 54,8 54,4 42,9<br />

Makhuduthamaga 12409 10686 19534 29370 32174 32780 70,3 75,1 62,7<br />

Fetakgomo 3611 4861 9184 9921 10449 13154 73,3 68,3 58,9<br />

Greater Tubatse 13938 19<strong>14</strong>7 49522 24464 30654 50221 63,7 61,6 50,4<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 60860 70481 128794 97622 110026 133274 61,6 61,0 50,9<br />

Source: Census (2011)


219<br />

In 2011, 49% of the persons who are of working age are employed compared to 51% that is<br />

unemployed. The total unemployment rate within <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is 50,9%.<br />

The average in Limpopo Province for unemployment rate is 38,9%. This clearly implies that<br />

unemployment is still quite high in the district. Waterberg <strong>District</strong> has lowest unemployment<br />

in Limpopo Province standing at 28.1%. Musina Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the lowest<br />

unemployment across at 18.7%.<br />

Figure 37: Employment levels 2011<br />

Source Census (2011)<br />

Comparatively, the situation has improved from 1996 where unemployment was standing at<br />

61.6% and recorded at 50.9 in 2011 although still very high. When comparing local<br />

municipalities in the district, Makhuduthamaga seem to be the hardest hit standing at 62.7%<br />

followed by Fetakgomo at 58.9% and Greater Tubatse at 50,4%.<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has an important role to play with regard to promoting job<br />

opportunities. Although it is the responsibility of government to create jobs, there is a need<br />

for the district to work collaboratively with other role players in the province and nationally to<br />

create conducive environment for business to invest in the district.


220<br />

There are three future job drivers that are likely to transform the unemployment rate in the<br />

district:<br />

· The Presidency has in terms of 17 Strategic Integrated Projects (SIP) identified SIP 1<br />

which will “unlock the northern mineral belt with Waterberg as the catalyst”<br />

· The second mineral wave which will see expansions in existing mining operations in<br />

the district as well as new projects<br />

· National Department of Trade and Industry is working on a special economic zone<br />

model that will see beneficiation of mining products in the district<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should therefore work very closely with the relevant<br />

stakeholders to ensure that these programmes are realised.<br />

Average Household Income<br />

Average household incomes from 2001-2011 have more than doubled across the district. In<br />

the district municipality, household income has shifted from R15 520 to R45 546 in 2011.<br />

The provincial average in R56 841 and therefore the district average household income is<br />

slightly below the provincial average. Greater Tubatse Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest<br />

average household income in the district, followed by Fetakgomo local municipality.<br />

Although unemployment in Fetakgomo is quite high, those who are working seem to be<br />

deriving high incomes.<br />

Table 92: Average household income<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> 2001 2011<br />

Ephraim Mogale 16 671 41 398<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 17 802 41 398<br />

Makhuduthamaga 12 768 38 109<br />

Fetakgomo <strong>14</strong> 850 47 755<br />

Greater Tubatse 16 166 54 546<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 15 520 45 977<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

Female Headed Households<br />

In the year 2011, 139 93 households in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> are headed by<br />

females. This represents 52,9% of the total households in the district. The provincial average<br />

in 50.4% and therefore the district one is slightly higher. Targeted social programmes that<br />

benefit women in particular are required to alleviate challenges in these households. The


221<br />

highest number of these households is found in Makhuduthamaga, Elias Motsoaledi and<br />

Fetakgomo municipalities.<br />

Table 93: Female Headed Households<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Female Headed<br />

Households<br />

Number of<br />

households<br />

% of female headed<br />

households<br />

1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011 1996 2001 2011<br />

Ephraim Mogale 10 020 13 254 16 550 19 664 24 189 32 284 51,0 54,8 51,3<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 24 048 26 794 32 061 42 605 45 478 60 251 56,4 58,9 53,2<br />

Makhuduthamaga 30 932 34 334 39 217 49 782 52 978 65 217 62,1 64,8 60,1<br />

Fetakgomo 10 817 11 565 12 769 17 372 18 883 22 851 62,3 61,2 55,9<br />

Greater Tubatse <strong>23</strong> 824 30 446 38 996 42 403 53 756 83 199 56,2 56,6 46,9<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 99 641 116<br />

393<br />

139<br />

593<br />

171<br />

827<br />

195<br />

285<br />

263<br />

802<br />

58,0 59,6 52,9<br />

Source Census (2011)<br />

Child Headed Households<br />

In 2011, 2 949 child headed households were recorded in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

This represents 1,1% of the households in the entire district. Ephraim Mogale and Elias<br />

Motsoaledi have recorded highest numbers of child headed households in the district.<br />

Makhuduthamaga also scored 1,1% of the households headed by children. Programmes to<br />

deal with this issue need to focus on the municipalities with the highest need.<br />

Table 94: Child Headed Households<br />

1996 2001 2011<br />

Househol<br />

ds<br />

headed<br />

by<br />

children<br />

Total<br />

househol<br />

ds<br />

% of<br />

child<br />

headed<br />

househol<br />

ds<br />

Househol<br />

ds<br />

headed<br />

by<br />

children<br />

Total<br />

househol<br />

ds<br />

% of<br />

child<br />

headed<br />

househol<br />

ds<br />

Househol<br />

ds<br />

headed<br />

by<br />

children<br />

Total<br />

househol<br />

ds<br />

% of<br />

child<br />

headed<br />

househol<br />

ds<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Makhudutham<br />

aga<br />

761 19 664 3,9 5<strong>14</strong> 42 701 1,2 464 32 284 1,4<br />

1 872 42 605 4,4 1 007 80 719 1,2 800 60 251 1,3<br />

1 794 49 782 3,6 917 95 710 1,0 737 65 217 1,1<br />

Fetakgomo 721 17 372 4,2 318 34 097 0,9 191 22 851 0,8


222<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

1 971 42 403 4,6 1 058 96 936 1,1 758 83 199 0,9<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 7 119 171 908 4,1 3 8<strong>14</strong> 195 285 2,0 2 949 263 802 1,1<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

Dependency Ratio 1<br />

Table 95: Dependency Ratio<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> 1996 2001 2011<br />

Ephraim Mogale 91,7 82,8 73,7<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 92,5 86,5 76,0<br />

Makhuduthamaga 105,9 94,8 85,4<br />

Fetakgomo 101,0 91,0 77,1<br />

Greater Tubatse 102,6 88,6 65,6<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 99,6 89,2 74,7<br />

Source: Census (2011)<br />

In 2011, the dependency ratio in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> stands at 74.7%. It is<br />

relatively higher compared to the provincial dependency ratio of 67.3. Waterberg has a<br />

dependency ratio of 55.5% and Thabazimbi has the lowest at 30.8%. It will be important to<br />

check the underlying factors that make Thabazimbi achieve such a low dependency ratio in<br />

Limpopo Province.<br />

Within the district however, Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> has the highest<br />

dependency ratio at 85.4 way above the district and provincial ratio. This is followed by<br />

Fetakgomo at 77.1 and Elias Motsoaledi at 76.0. There is marked improvement in Greater<br />

Tubatse’s dependency ratio from 102.6 in 1996 to 65.6 in 2011.<br />

It is very indispensable that the municipalities with higher dependency ratio receive much<br />

attention with regard to poverty alleviation programmes and also programmes that will lead<br />

to income generation. Makhuduthamaga, Elias Motsoaledi and Fetakgomo should therefore<br />

be prioritised for poverty alleviation programmes.<br />

Figure 38: Local Economic Development Projects<br />

1 Dependency ratio tells us how many young people under the age of 16 and older people over 64 years who<br />

are not working that have to depend on those who are working age and paying taxes. The higher the<br />

dependency ratio, the more people that need looking after


2<strong>23</strong><br />

Source: SDM Ward committees 2011<br />

Across all the villages in the district, it has been established that there were 379 project<br />

initiatives that were in the form of economic activities. 70% (264) of these initiatives were in<br />

the Agricultural sector compared to 24% (93) in Trade; 4% (<strong>14</strong>) were in Tourism and 2% (8)<br />

were in mining. The picture indicates that most villages are engaged in Agriculture activities<br />

as source of economic opportunity. These initiatives are mainly subsistence in nature and<br />

involve groups of people in the form of cooperatives or just groups working together.<br />

A high number of Local Economic Development initiatives were found in Elias Motsoaledi<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (87 initiatives) followed by Makhuduthamaga Local <strong>Municipality</strong> (84<br />

initiatives); Greater Tubatse (83); Fetakgomo (74) and Ephraim Mogale (51 initiatives).<br />

In general, Agriculture seems to be the sector that received the most attention where 264<br />

initiatives were recorded across the district followed by Trade (93); Tourism (<strong>14</strong>) and finally<br />

mining (8).<br />

It is important to point out that the district municipality and its locals must develop strategies<br />

that will address the development of key sectors in the district namely mining, agriculture<br />

and tourism. Tourism and mining seem to be receiving little attention from community<br />

initiatives and therefore the district and its locals need to zoom into these two areas to<br />

establish reasons. Agriculture, although receiving much attention, tends to focus on small<br />

holder gardens without a clear focus on growth.<br />

3.5.3. Challenges<br />

· The economic potential of the <strong>District</strong> may be undermined by demographic,<br />

infrastructural and spatial challenges alluded to elsewhere in this chapter.<br />

· The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy is excessively reliant on public sector funding with<br />

community services being a major contributor to GGP in the area.


224<br />

· Most revenue flows out of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> economy as residents and businesses<br />

source and sell their goods and services outside the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

· Decline in global demands for the minerals produced in the area, continued water<br />

scarcity and the increasing mechanization of platinum mining could affect<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>’s mining industry negatively in the future<br />

· Insufficient beneficiation and value-adding activities occur within the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

economy at present.<br />

· Commercial agriculture is coming under increasing pressure as rising input costs; a<br />

stronger local currency, lower commodity prices and external competition take their<br />

toll.<br />

· Subsistence farming continues to dominate the agricultural sector in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />

· The <strong>District</strong>’s tourism potential is not being fully exploited as yet because of a lack of<br />

tourism infrastructure and poor related services.<br />

· The skills profile in the district is low, due to low level of education. This will result in<br />

the economy failing to manage any developmental intervention that the district<br />

may come up with.<br />

· Insufficient funding to implement programmes and projects identified in the LED<br />

strategy.<br />

3.5.4. <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Development Agency (SDA)<br />

3.5.4.1. Introduction to SDA<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Development Agency (SDA) is wholly owned by the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> and has been in existence since 2005, operationalized in 2006 through<br />

appointment of the first Board of Directors. It is befitting to define it as being at an early<br />

development stage, particularly given the progress it has made thus far. Like any<br />

organization at that stage, it constantly strives to strike a balance between setting and<br />

pursuing its development path whilst simultaneously addressing operational limitations. Such<br />

a scenario often results in multiple and competing priorities, with limited resources to ensure<br />

their attainment, that blur progression towards attaining the desired outcomes.<br />

The function and activities of SDA is informed by the following statutory and legal framework:<br />

· Company’s Act<br />

· Municipal Systems Act, 2000<br />

· Municipal Systems Amendment Act, 2011<br />

3.5.4.2. Status Quo on SDA<br />

SDA is still at an establishment stage of organisational development – it does not have a<br />

sizeable organisational muscle to carry out ambitious programmes that may be beyond its<br />

capabilities. This does not preclude it from attempting such programmes in partnership with<br />

current or new development partners


225<br />

A new board has just been unveiled and its mandate is also clearly articulated - the board<br />

sought to set a strategic path, canvass support for it and guide management in driving the<br />

implementation.<br />

PROJECT STUDIES UNDERTAKEN<br />

Project Description & Status Quo<br />

· Tjate Heritage Site Feasibility study<br />

This project entails studying the possibility of establishing a tourist facility at the Tjate<br />

Heritage Site for tourism attraction. Tjate Heritage Site forms the core of the special interest<br />

cluster within the Tourism Strategy and is one of the flagship projects. Tjate was the royal<br />

seat of the ancient <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Empire. It could become the primary core of all tourism<br />

attractions in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />

The study is completed, however ruled out the idea of constructing a facility and encouraged<br />

that thorough marketing and events be made to promote the site since it is not known to<br />

many tourists due to its location<br />

· Potlake Game Reserve<br />

The project involved development of chalets, camping site, picnic site and conference<br />

facilities at the reserve. The study proved feasible. Currently all stakeholders are still<br />

negotiating on a suitable model. The development of the nature reserve is aligned to the<br />

Limpopo Provincial Growth and Development Strategy’s objective to achieve a growing<br />

economy with sustainable jobs, innovation and competitiveness.<br />

· Schuinsdraai/Flag Boshielo Tourism Development<br />

The project entails development of an integrated tourism facility within the Flag Boshielo<br />

precinct.<br />

· Rubber Tyre Recycling Plant<br />

The project entails establishment of a tyre and rubber recycling center and processing plant<br />

of the waste tyre. This is a green environment project and its main aim is the promotion of<br />

the optimal utilisation of available landfill site space by formulating more environmentally and<br />

economically sustainable ways in which waste tyres can be recycled or discarded, while at<br />

the same time promoting the generation of an income for tyre collectors and recyclers.<br />

· Small Scale Mining Feasibility<br />

NON STUDIED PROJECTS


226<br />

· Mining Preferential Procurement Incubation Project<br />

The project seeks to contribute towards mine community development utilizing Preferential<br />

Procurement and Enterprise Development as part of the Government strategy to broaden<br />

the national economic participation and achievement of social stability. The project will build<br />

capacity within our SMME’s through an incubation process which will enable them to supply<br />

the mines in the district.<br />

· Emerging Farmer Identification and Support Project<br />

The agency pursued the project with an intention to address the agricultural challenges that<br />

the district is facing. The project involves identification of all potential pockets of lands for<br />

agricultural purposes and communities and farmers who are prepared to produce. The<br />

Agency partnered with Crebus and Land Bank to assist farmers in the district. Many farmers<br />

applied for financial and technical assistance from Land bank and Crebus. During the end of<br />

the financial year in question 103 farmers had submitted for financial assistance from Land<br />

bank.<br />

The other areas that the agency was looking at was revival of all the collapsed LDA funded<br />

irrigation schemes in the district and as well by the end of this financial year the agency was<br />

in deep consultations with relevant stakeholders. The Agency is working hard to unlock all<br />

the schemes to be fully productive by end of next financial year.<br />

3.5.4.3. Challenges facing SDA<br />

The mining sector has remained very difficult to work with. The study conducted proved to<br />

be difficult to access information both from the mining companies and the DMR itself.<br />

However the sector needs more attention since is the strongest sector in the district.<br />

The manufacturing sector also received attention towards the end of the season especially<br />

when looking at agro-processing in the district. The feasibility study on rubber tyre recycling<br />

plant proved to be unsustainable leaving less space for the agency to pursue the project.<br />

The facilitation and securing of direct investments to the projects which proved feasible<br />

remains a challenge. Our communities still have their own internal differences which also<br />

impact on development.<br />

The following are some of the organizational challenges the Agency is facing:<br />

- Shortage of permanent personnel and insufficient skill base<br />

- Vision not yet shared by relevant stakeholders and shareholder<br />

- Lack of coordination on facilitation of economic projects<br />

- Shared supply chain management<br />

- Fragmented financial management arrangements<br />

- Insufficient internal controls – staffing inadequacies<br />

- Adverse audit report – disclaimer


227<br />

- Competition with LED units over projects to be implemented<br />

3.6. FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

3.6.1. Introduction<br />

The financial objective of the SDM is to secure sound and sustainable management of the<br />

financial affairs of the <strong>District</strong> and to assist the five local municipalities within the SDM to be<br />

financially viable. The Audit reports as issued by the Auditor General for the past five years<br />

have indicated a lot of financial challenges ranging from disclaimer audit reports, low<br />

revenue collection, inadequate asset management and internal controls.<br />

3.6.2. Compliance with Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA)<br />

‣ Section 63 – Assets and Liability Management<br />

The municipality has a GRAP compliant asset register which is updated on a<br />

quarterly basis.<br />

‣ Section 64 – Revenue Management<br />

The municipality has credit control and debt management policy and the tariff policy<br />

which are reviewed annually. The municipality derives its revenue from government<br />

grants and billing of water consumption. Billing is done on the 25 th of every month<br />

through the MunSoft system, which is planned to be faced out and will be replaces by<br />

E-Venus. Draft revenue enhancement strategy is being developed awaiting council<br />

approval.<br />

‣ Section 82 – Delegations<br />

Compiles reviews and approved a Register of Delegated Powers and Functions<br />

annually.<br />

‣ Section 83 – Competency Levels of professional Financial Officials<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Provides assistance to personnel to improve competency levels<br />

‣ Section 111 – Supply Chain Management<br />

Supply Chain Management Policy was adopted by Council in 2005 and is reviewed<br />

annually with the adoption of the budget. The municipality has established a threepart<br />

bid committee system.<br />

‣ Section 165 – Internal Audit Unit<br />

An internal audit unit has been established and functional with appointment of three<br />

officials. The unit has an audit charter which was approved and adopted by council in<br />

2008 and is reviewed annually.<br />

‣ Section 166 – Audit Committee


228<br />

Audit committee has been established and effective. It is scheduled to meet at least<br />

four times in a year. The audit committee has an audit committee charter which<br />

was approved and adopted by committee and noted by council in 2008 and reviewed<br />

annually.<br />

Conformity exists within the following stipulations on report and reportable<br />

matters:<br />

- Section 71 – Monthly budget statement to Provincial and National treasury (xx<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> to sign off monthly reports to PT & NT for full compliance.<br />

- Section 72 – Midyear budget and performance assessment by accounting Officer.<br />

- Section 75 – Prescribed information placed on official website.<br />

- Section 121 and 127 – Annual Report that includes:<br />

• The annual financial statements<br />

• The annual report<br />

Table 96: The AFS has been compiled in terms of GAMAP/GRAP<br />

Financial Year<br />

Audit Report<br />

2006/07 Disclaimer<br />

2007/08 Disclaimer<br />

2008/09 Disclaimer<br />

2009/10 Disclaimer<br />

2010/11 Disclaimer<br />

2011/12 Outstanding<br />

‣ Section 129 – Oversight reports on Annual Reports<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> has established an oversight Committee which considers the<br />

adoption of the annual report.<br />

‣ Section 131 – Issue raised by the Auditor-General in Audit report<br />

The municipality developed an action plan to deal with issues by Auditor-General,<br />

which is monitored on a monthly basis management to track progress.<br />

3.6.3. Overall Challenges<br />

1. Lack of capacity – training<br />

2. Lack of asset management<br />

3. Insufficient Office space<br />

4. Lack of internal control – safe guarding of assets<br />

5. Non-compliance related to bid box<br />

6. Lack of BEE scorecard model<br />

7. Inadequate SMME development


229<br />

8. Lack of communication channels with external stakeholders<br />

9. Inadequate information security<br />

10. Non adherence to timelines<br />

11. Interference on Supply Chain Management and Payments processes<br />

12. Promulgation of by-laws<br />

13. Cash Management Security<br />

<strong>14</strong>. Low collection rate/<br />

15. Insufficient credit control measures<br />

16. Indigent register updating<br />

17. Non adherence to cash flow management<br />

18. Over commitment of budget<br />

The installation of a comprehensive financial system is 75% complete. The system will<br />

ensure:<br />

· Improved control and management of Supply Chain Management processes<br />

· Accurate expenditure reporting<br />

· Accurate and up to date cash flow monitoring<br />

· More stringent financial controls<br />

· A reliable picture of the state of the district municipality’s finances<br />

Key high level delivery<br />

areas<br />

Management of revenue and<br />

expenditure<br />

Detailed activities Status quo 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />

Management of creditors and<br />

accounts<br />

Management of payroll<br />

In 2011/<strong>2013</strong> financial year a<br />

Disclaimer audit opinion was<br />

obtained<br />

50% compliance with fixed<br />

asset register<br />

40% updated inventory<br />

register<br />

60% compliance with<br />

disposal processes of asset<br />

management policy<br />

80% of creditors paid within<br />

30 days of invoice date<br />

Scanning of documents from<br />

hard to electronic versions<br />

not implemented<br />

Expenditure reconciliation<br />

being undertaken annually<br />

58% collection rate attained


<strong>23</strong>0<br />

50% of service level<br />

agreements available and<br />

updated on the contract<br />

register<br />

3.6.4. Asset Management<br />

Introduction<br />

The role of Asset Management is critical to any business environment whether private or<br />

public sector. In the past municipalities used a cash-based system to account for assets,<br />

whilst the trend has been to move to an accrual system. With the cash-based system, assets<br />

were written off at year end and no costs were attached to subsequent period in which<br />

assets would be used. With the accrual system, assets are incorporated into the books of<br />

accounts and systematically written off over their anticipated lives.<br />

This necessitates that record of asset costs are kept and key asset management functions<br />

required are:<br />

‣ Recognition of all existing assets<br />

‣ Safeguarding assets<br />

‣ Maintaining assets<br />

‣ Establishing accounting and information systems that account for the assets of the<br />

municipality<br />

‣ Valuation principles in accordance with GRAP<br />

‣ Establishing and maintaining systems of internal controls over assets<br />

‣ Establishing and maintaining GRAP compliant asset register<br />

‣ Clarifying responsibilities and accountabilities for the asset management process<br />

Effective asset management functions are guided by following statutory and legal<br />

framework:<br />

‣ Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996<br />

‣ Public Finance management Act, of 1999<br />

‣ National Treasury Asset management framework<br />

‣ Municipal Finance management Act, of 2003<br />

‣ Local Government Financial Best Practice Manual<br />

‣ Disaster Management Act, of 2002<br />

‣ National Water Act, of 1998<br />

‣ Water Service Act, of 1997<br />

‣ Municipal System Act, of 2000<br />

‣ Municipal Structures Act, of 1998


<strong>23</strong>1<br />

STATUS QUO<br />

MOVEABLE ASSETS<br />

Moveable assets are all bar coded and linked to responsible custodians in all departments<br />

Verification is been conducted quarterly, new acquired assets are bar coded upon receipt,<br />

condition of assets is recorded during verification, monthly reconciliation and calculation s<br />

of depreciation have started. Most of our assets allocated to depots are too old and require<br />

an effective strategy to replace them. An auction for obsolete, damaged and redundant<br />

assets was conducted-during 2012/13 and it was a success<br />

IMMOVABLES ASSETS<br />

Completed immovable assets were unbundled and Auditor General disclaimed the<br />

municipality on the unbundled Fixed Asset Register due to lack of supporting documents to<br />

support the unbundled assets.<br />

We are in progress of gathering relevant information to unbundle all outstanding and new<br />

projects developed (WIP & completed) .as part of our three year plan. The primary objective<br />

of our three year plan is mainly to unbundle and review all projects including assessment of<br />

their condition for impairments purposes.<br />

In continuation of our three year plan, during <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> an asset maintenance plan will be<br />

developed to will be developed to ensure that projects attain anticipated lives. Impairment<br />

tests will be conducted quarterly to cross check effectiveness of the asset maintenance plan<br />

and adjustments be done were necessary.<br />

STORES MANAGEMENT<br />

The inventory system is not functional during this 2012/13 financial year. Stores records are<br />

kept manually, showing opening balance of 2012/13<br />

Stores management procedures manual have been reviewed and service standards have<br />

been developed to ensure efficient and effective running of stores.<br />

CHALLENGES<br />

‣ Skills shortage<br />

‣ Stores items procured directly from departmental votes<br />

‣ Inventory register is maintained manually attributed to direct purchases<br />

‣ Decentralised stores management<br />

‣ Unavailability of projects information (data)<br />

3.6.5. Budget and Reporting


<strong>23</strong>2<br />

Introduction<br />

The role of Budget unit is to compile; coordinate and monitor budget of the<br />

municipality. This is an on-going process where it requires great skills and extensive<br />

attention to details.<br />

The main aim of this Unit is:-<br />

· To ensure accurate reporting for improvement in decision making.<br />

· Preparation of the municipal budget and monitoring of the budget.<br />

· To effectively manage funds and keep municipal debts at minimal level.<br />

· To ensure accuracy and consistency in our municipal budget.<br />

Table 97: Challenges and backlogs at Budget & Treasury Unit<br />

Key<br />

Priority Status Quo Challenges<br />

performance<br />

Area<br />

Financial<br />

Management<br />

To ensure sufficient<br />

reserve funds to<br />

address asset<br />

renewal by creation<br />

of capital<br />

replacement reserve<br />

fund<br />

Non-existence of capital<br />

replacement reserve funds.<br />

Minimal own funding to address<br />

assets renewals.<br />

Unable to budget for sufficient<br />

capital replacements on<br />

dilapidated infrastructure<br />

assets due to insufficient<br />

budget on own funding<br />

To ensure timely<br />

submission of<br />

Annual Financial<br />

and improved Audit<br />

Opinion<br />

To ensure<br />

preparation and<br />

implementation of<br />

realistic budget for<br />

the municipality<br />

AFS submitted by 30th November<br />

2012<br />

Obtained a disclaimer audit opinion<br />

by Feb <strong>2013</strong><br />

Four budgets made<br />

(Original budget, roll-over budget,<br />

special adjustment budget due to<br />

non-approval of unspent grants<br />

and mid-year adjustment budget.<br />

Monthly reconciliation of<br />

account balances not done on<br />

time. Standards chart of<br />

accounts not properly ring<br />

fenced on to the financial<br />

system.<br />

Inability of municipality to<br />

spend the original budget<br />

accordingly which results in a<br />

number of adjustment budget<br />

passed on the original budget.<br />

3.6.6. Revenue Management<br />

Introduction<br />

Revenue Management is the application of disciplined analytics that predict consumer<br />

behaviour at the local government level and optimize service availability and price to


<strong>23</strong>3<br />

maximize revenue growth. The primary aim of Revenue Management is providing the<br />

mandated services to the right consumers at the right time for the right price. The essence of<br />

this discipline is in understanding consumers’ perception of service value and accurately<br />

aligning service prices, placement and availability with each consumer segment.<br />

The Revenue Management Process entails:<br />

‣ Data Collection<br />

‣ Segmentation<br />

‣ Forecasting<br />

‣ Optimization<br />

‣ Dynamic Re-evaluation<br />

Effective revenue management functions are guided by following statutory and legal<br />

framework:<br />

‣ Division of Revenue Act<br />

‣ Public Finance management Act, of 1999<br />

‣ Municipal Finance management Act, of 2003<br />

‣ Local Government Financial Best Practice Manual<br />

‣ National Water Act, of 1998<br />

‣ Water Service Act, of 1997<br />

‣ Municipal System Act, of 2000<br />

Status Quo<br />

SDM has entered into service level agreements with three of its local municipalities (Elias<br />

Motsoaledi; Ephraim Mogale; Greater Tubatse) for billing and collection. As per the signed<br />

SLA, contracts are due to cease end June <strong>2013</strong>. SDM had a retail contract with LNW which<br />

expired in 2006 for Flag Boshielo East & West. The SLA’s had a provision of 70/30<br />

commission based on billing.<br />

Data Collection<br />

The Revenue Management process begins with data collection. Relevant data are<br />

paramount to a Revenue Management System’s capability to provide accurate, actionable<br />

information. A system must collect and store historical data for inventory, prices, demand,<br />

and other causal factors. Any data that reflects the details of services offered their prices and<br />

consumer payment rate, stored, and analysed.<br />

Billing<br />

Billing process takes the form of the automated billing on eVenus, interest and sundry billing<br />

will be in the form of journals.<br />

Included in the billing process are the following processes:


<strong>23</strong>4<br />

1. refunds, (clearance, deposit)<br />

2. change of ownership,<br />

3. adjustments, (over and under billing)<br />

4. change of service, cancellation of service, (Adjustment of service)<br />

5. handling of queries,<br />

6. processing of service order (meter readings sheets)<br />

Credit Control<br />

The municipality’s collection process follows the under-mentioned steps:<br />

1. Telephone Collection.<br />

2. Written reminder.<br />

3. Final Notice.<br />

4. Communication with Water Service departments for service termination or restriction<br />

5. Legal action/ hand-over to the municipality attorneys or debt collectors.<br />

6. Listing of debtors with Credit Bureau.<br />

7. Recommendation for write off as bad debt.<br />

Receipting<br />

1. Ensuring that the cash receipts process are performed efficiently (using the best<br />

methods to secure cash receipts)<br />

2. Ensuring that cash received is banked and recorded on a timely basis.<br />

3. To ensure that cash from debtors is received and recorded<br />

4. To ensure that receipts are recorded at the correct amount<br />

Challenges<br />

‣ Data Management & cleansing<br />

‣ Meter Reading<br />

‣ Indigent Management<br />

‣ Service Delivery<br />

‣ Implementation of WSA/WSP agreements<br />

3.6.7. Supply Chain Management<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Supply Chain Management Unit is established in order to procure goods and services,<br />

disposes goods no longer needed and select contractors to provide assistance in the<br />

provision of municipal services.<br />

The Supply Chain Management Unit should ensure that bid documentation, evaluation and<br />

adjudication criteria and general conditions of a contract, are in accordance with any<br />

applicable legislation and that any Treasury guidelines on Supply Chain Management are<br />

properly taken into account when procuring goods or services.


<strong>23</strong>5<br />

Legislative Requirement<br />

a) The constitution of the republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996<br />

b) The preferential procurement policy framework Act 5 of 2000<br />

c) The broad based black empowerment Act 53 of 2003<br />

d) Municipal Finance Management Act ,No.56 of 200<br />

STATUS QUO<br />

BID COMMITTEES<br />

All Supply Chain Management Committees that have been established are:<br />

a. Specification Committee<br />

b. Evaluation Committee<br />

c. Adjudication Committee<br />

d. Quotation Committee<br />

All Committees are fully functional<br />

ADVERTISEMENT OF TENDERS<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

Briefings are being conducted before the closing date of tender.<br />

Tenders are advertised in two national newspapers.<br />

Seven days quotations are advertised on the notice board.<br />

Tender documentation are submitted in the tender box, which is opened on the<br />

closing date of the tender.<br />

TENDER DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT<br />

ü<br />

The tender documents are submitted to registry of the evaluation and adjudication<br />

has been conducted.<br />

CHALLENGES<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

ü<br />

Non functionality of the website<br />

Manual rotation of database<br />

Skills shortage<br />

Procurement plan<br />

3.6.8. Contract Management<br />

Introduction


<strong>23</strong>6<br />

v<br />

Contract Management a function of ensuring that contracts are managed and<br />

accounted for in compliance with the MFMA. The unit is required to identify all<br />

contracts and stakeholders, to classify all contracts for management purposes, to<br />

manage all the stages in the contract life cycle, to correctly account for contracts in<br />

financial statements, to ensure that services are delivered within specification and at<br />

agreed costs, and to avoid legal disputes and cost overruns by ensuring that contract<br />

are managed properly. Contract management is therefore essential for good financial<br />

management and contributes to efficient and effective service delivery.<br />

Status Quo<br />

- Despite having only one official in the unit, it is on course to ensure that the following<br />

are in place before the end of the financial year:<br />

· Contract register is fully update;<br />

· All service providers in the <strong>Municipality</strong> have signed contracts;<br />

· Advice is provided to departments as and when required<br />

Contract Management Framework<br />

v<br />

It sets out the requirements for managing and accounting for contracts and<br />

requires organisational wide approach.<br />

Challenges<br />

- Appointment of a contract management officer;<br />

- Ensuring that reports from project managers and other end users are submitted<br />

monthly to monitor performance;<br />

- Ensure that all departments submit contracts to the unit.<br />

3.6.9. Expenditure Management Unit<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The expenditure management is responsible for the management of the expenditure of the<br />

entity, and include taking all reasonable steps to ensure that the entity has and maintains an<br />

effective system of expenditure control including procedures for approval, authorisation,<br />

withdrawal and payment of fund. And that the entity has and maintains a management,<br />

accounting and information system which:<br />

· Recognises expenditure when it is incurred ;<br />

· Accounts for creditors of the entity ;<br />

· Accounts for payments made by the entity<br />

That the entity has and maintains a system of internal control in respect of creditors and<br />

payments, further that all money owed for goods and services is paid within 30days of<br />

receiving the relevant invoices or statement unless prescribed otherwise for certain<br />

categories of expenditure.


<strong>23</strong>7<br />

And that payments by the entity are made directly to the person to whom it is due unless<br />

agreed otherwise only for the reasons as may be prescribed; and either electronically or by<br />

way of non transferable cheques, provided that cash payment and payments by way of cash<br />

cheque may be made exceptional reasons only.<br />

Ensure that the entity complies with its statutory commitments and that the available working<br />

capital is managed effectively and economically in terms of any prescribed cash<br />

management and Investment framework, and that the entity has and implements a supply<br />

chain management policy in accordance with relevant legislations in a way that is fair,<br />

equitable, transparent and cost- effective.<br />

Irregular or fruitless and wasteful expenditure<br />

On discovery or realisation of any irregular expenditure or any fruitless and wasteful<br />

expenditure ,the entity report in writing to the municipal manager ,mayor and the Auditor<br />

General the particulars of the expenditure ;and any steps that have been taken to recover<br />

the expenditure and prevent a recurrence of same.<br />

Invoices receiving<br />

Invoices and payments certificates are registered in the register when submitted and are<br />

stamped with the stamp marked received.<br />

Invoices and payment certificates are further checked for completeness and manual<br />

authorisation.<br />

Invoices payments<br />

Payments are electronically processed on the financial system and Electronic payments are<br />

effected to providers.<br />

3.6.10. Summary overview of the MTREF<br />

Table 98: Summary overview of the MTREF<br />

Description Adjustment<br />

Budget 2012/13<br />

Budget year<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

Budget year +1<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15<br />

Budget year +2<br />

2015/16<br />

Total operating<br />

revenue<br />

Total operating<br />

expenditure<br />

Surplus/Deficit<br />

for the year<br />

447 009 289 505 264 396 531 788 796 610 164 382<br />

530 024 043 578 874 456 575 157 016 605 086 413<br />

83 0<strong>14</strong> 753 73 610 060 43 368 219 5 077 970


<strong>23</strong>8<br />

Total Capital<br />

Expenditure<br />

673 716 682 849 317 000 1 129 346 390 1 256 556 724<br />

3.7. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

Introduction<br />

The SDM has achieved remarkable progress in institutionalizing and implementing its<br />

communication and consultation mechanisms and processes. The <strong>District</strong> Communication<br />

Strategy has been adopted in 2005 and it is in the process of being reviewed. The medium<br />

for communication is highlighted and includes Mayoral Community Outreaches, <strong>District</strong><br />

newsletters, Annual Report, Local and National Newspapers, Provincial and Local radio<br />

stations, Flyers, Ward Committee system, Community Development Workers (CDWs), as<br />

well as loud-hailing.<br />

The <strong>District</strong> improves on good governance and public participation through focus on internal<br />

audit, risk management, public participation, communications and performance management<br />

among others.<br />

3.7.1. Internal Audit<br />

Introduction<br />

Primary role of Internal Audit is to assist the municipality to accomplish its objectives by<br />

bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of<br />

risk management, control and governance processes.<br />

The risk management function involves the evaluation of the effectiveness of risk<br />

management processes as implemented by the council.<br />

Status Quo<br />

· Control<br />

It assists the organization in maintaining effective systems of internal control by evaluating<br />

their effectiveness and efficiency.<br />

· Governance Processes<br />

We assess and make appropriate recommendations for improving the governance process<br />

in its accomplishment of the following objectives:<br />

‣ Promoting appropriate ethics and values within the <strong>Municipality</strong>;


<strong>23</strong>9<br />

‣ Ensuring effective organizational performance management and accountability;<br />

‣ Communicating risk and control information to appropriate areas of the organization;<br />

and<br />

‣ Coordinating the activities of and communicating information among the Council,<br />

external and internal auditors, and management.<br />

These are achieved through performing the following types of Internal Audits:<br />

1. Risk Based Audits<br />

2. Performance Audits<br />

3. IT Audits<br />

4. Consulting and Advisory Services<br />

5. Management request<br />

Challenges to be addressed by Internal Audit Unit<br />

• Limitation of scope<br />

• Fallible ICT Systems<br />

• Late submission of Performance report<br />

• Unreported cases<br />

• Inefficiencies and Duplication of efforts<br />

• Inconsistent practices<br />

• Unconverged Audit Committee meetings<br />

• Uncoordinated activities<br />

3.7.2. Risk Management<br />

Introduction<br />

As a “possibility of loss”, risk permeates/spreads across all functional areas of all institutions<br />

including SDM.<br />

Through the process of undertaking various activities towards achievement of our objectives,<br />

SDM is expected as per MFMA Act 56 of 2003, MSA of 2000 and PFMA Act 1 of 1999 as<br />

amended by Act 29 of 1999 to design a process necessary and appropriate for provision of<br />

reasonable assurance regarding achievement of SDM’s set objectives.<br />

Risk Management is now regarded as part of the overall infrastructural improvement geared<br />

towards attainment of effective and efficient Corporate Governance regime.<br />

Status Quo<br />

Because of this recognition, SDM has established a risk management unit tasked with the<br />

responsibility of inculcating a sound corporate governance culture, ensuring best practice<br />

and integrated approach to practicing of risk management within SDM.


240<br />

The above is done in order to ensure that risk is managed on an ongoing basis through<br />

control activities that occur throughout the institution, at all levels and in all functions areas.<br />

SDM finds it appropriate to implement Enterprise Risk Management in order to:<br />

- Improve governance<br />

- Improve operational efficiency and effectiveness<br />

- Improve identification of opportunities and threats<br />

- Comply with legal requirements and international norms<br />

- Increase the likelihood of achievement of set objectives<br />

- Minimize losses<br />

- Improve institutional resilience<br />

- Be aware of the need to identify and treat risk throughout the institution<br />

- Improve stakeholder confidence and trust<br />

- Establish solid basis for decision-making and planning<br />

- Improve loss prevention and incident management<br />

- Encourage proactive management<br />

- Improve financial reporting<br />

- Appropriately allocate and use resource of risk treatment<br />

- Enhance Occupational Health and Safety performance, as well as protection of the<br />

environment.<br />

Challenges<br />

· Slow process of implementation of the Risk Management Policy<br />

· Approval and Implementation of a Risk Management Implementation Plan<br />

· Non-existence of Risk Management IT System/Infrastructure<br />

· Disintegrated Approach to Risk Management<br />

· Integration of Risk Management Committee functions into the current Audit<br />

Committee<br />

· The reviewal of the Fraud and Anti-corruption Strategy<br />

3.7.3. Public Participation<br />

Introduction<br />

Municipalities are by law required to foster public participation and ensure its<br />

citizenry is engaged in matters of governance. SDM place public participation<br />

and accountability at the centre of its work. The <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted a<br />

Public Participation Policy Framework which encompasses an ongoing public<br />

participation programme.


241<br />

Purpose: To facilitate public participation, public relations and participatory<br />

democracy.<br />

Functions of Public Participation:<br />

- Coordinate public participation and stakeholder engagement<br />

- Coordinate oversight visits of council committees<br />

- Compile oversight visits reports to Council<br />

Status Quo<br />

Public Participation Unit is in the Speaker’s Office. It has a complement of 4 personnel, a<br />

Manager, Public Participation Officer and 2 Public Participation Coordinators.<br />

SDM has a Public Participation Policy Framework that has been adopted by council.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> of the policy is done annually.<br />

The objectives of the policy are as follows;<br />

· Meet the legal requirements around community participation that are spelled out in<br />

the Municipal systems Act No. 32 of 2000.<br />

· Build an open, transparent and accountable system of governance.<br />

· Develop a culture of community participation through creating conditions for local<br />

communities to participate in the affairs of the municipality.<br />

· Assist vulnerable groups to participate effectively in the system of local government.<br />

· Provide clear, sufficient and timeous information concerning community participation<br />

to communities.<br />

· Communicate decisions of Council.<br />

· Communicate public notices of meetings for communities in a manner that promotes<br />

optimal public participation.<br />

· Set up systems and mechanisms that will ensure compliance with regulations and<br />

guidelines that may be issued from National or Provincial Government.<br />

The Public Participation policy framework spells out the roles and responsibilities of;<br />

· Council,<br />

· Executive Mayor,<br />

· The Speaker,<br />

· Portfolio and Standing Committees,<br />

· Ward Councilors,<br />

· Management and Administration,<br />

· The Public (Ward Committees) and<br />

· Community Development Workers


242<br />

SDM public participation take place through;<br />

· Mayoral Imbizos<br />

· Speaker’s outreach<br />

· <strong>IDP</strong>’s<br />

Ward Committees/Community Development Workers (CDWs)<br />

Ward Committees are important structures that are at the heart of communities and are used<br />

to enhance community participation in the affairs of the municipalities. The SDM has<br />

successfully launched 116 ward committees in the <strong>District</strong>. There is still a challenge of<br />

ensuring that they are motivated to effectively assist their communities. The other major<br />

challenges are resignation, lack of resources, transportation in vast wards, low literacy levels<br />

and in some cases lack of clarity in terms of their roles and responsibilities in their respective<br />

areas. It is within the ward committee system that the district expects community<br />

participation to be effective particularly during the <strong>IDP</strong> consultation period. It is therefore<br />

imperative that ward committees should get support and capacity building through training.<br />

Apart from the ward committees, there are the CDWs that are an integral part of the ward<br />

committee system in this exercise of assisting communities to achieve their needs. The<br />

CDWs help communities and the municipalities to fast-track delivery of services and the<br />

eradication of poverty. The province has deployed 115 CDWs to the <strong>District</strong> to assist<br />

communities on developmental issues. The only challenge which is there with this structure<br />

is that it exclude some communities while others communities have more than one CDW in a<br />

ward.<br />

Challenges to be addressed by the PP Unit<br />

· Stakeholder management policy<br />

· Speaker’s outreach<br />

· Geographic Names Change PP programmes<br />

3.7.4. Communications, Executive Support and Special Programmes<br />

Introduction<br />

The SDM has achieved remarkable progress in institutionalizing and implementing its<br />

communication and consultation mechanisms and processes. The <strong>District</strong> Communication<br />

Strategy has been adopted in 2005, reviewed in 2011 for a five year term of office for the<br />

current council (2011-2016). The medium for communication is highlighted and includes<br />

Mayoral Community Outreaches, <strong>District</strong> newsletters, Annual Report, Local and National<br />

Newspapers, Provincial and Local radio stations, Flyers, Ward Committee system,<br />

Community Development Workers (CDWs), as well as loud-hailing.


243<br />

The district has established a functional district communicators forum which coordinate, align<br />

and streamline wide government programmes involving sector departments, municipalities<br />

and other government Institutions.<br />

Status Quo<br />

Community Feedback Meetings<br />

The <strong>District</strong> engages stakeholders like traditional leaders, business, labour, civil society,<br />

sector groups etc. in matters affecting them in their different areas of responsibilities. This<br />

community feedback programme assist in the improvement of communication and<br />

interaction between the district, local municipalities and broader community on issues of<br />

service delivery and development. Local municipalities are visited during FORA, Imbizo and<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> consultations.<br />

Media Liaison (Electronic and print Media)<br />

The SDM utilizes both electronic and print media to improve and broaden communication in<br />

the area of its jurisdiction. It also uses national and local Radios. Although loud-hailing is an<br />

effective way of conveying message to communities, the SDM also uses radio for advertising<br />

meetings, workshops, conferences, summits and other functions.<br />

Communication is also done through print media in the form of external and internal<br />

newsletters, local, regional and national newspapers and websites. The <strong>District</strong> produces<br />

newsletters on monthly and quarterly basis and when a need for special print medium<br />

communication arises.<br />

An exciting initiative in the current financial year has been the innovation and commitment to<br />

support local content in the form of bulk media buying for both print and electronic media. A<br />

total of eight (08) media houses benefited, three radio stations and five newspapers.<br />

Promotional Materials<br />

Promotional materials like note-pads, pens, posters, flyers and banners are used by the<br />

<strong>District</strong> to reinforce the flow and the dissemination of information to the broader society of<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong>. Some of these promotional materials are distributed during <strong>District</strong> events to<br />

encourage and motivate effective community participation.<br />

The communication unit has been able to implement the decision on austerity measures on<br />

cutting expensive promotional materials such as t-shirts.<br />

Youth Development<br />

The SDM has adequately addressed youth development through the appointment of special<br />

personnel to deal directly with youth issues. It is in this office where developmental issues


244<br />

like unemployment, lack of housing, poverty, shortage of skills, high levels of crime and<br />

violence, social and family disintegration and other social ills like HIV/AIDS that affect youth<br />

are addressed. It is within this background that youth development strategy should be<br />

developed to assist young people to deal with issues that affect them as unemployed,<br />

unskilled, vulnerable and under-resourced. Resources should be biasely channeled towards<br />

the development of young people’s projects for their upliftment to stop the escalation of<br />

crime and violence.<br />

Women Empowerment<br />

Women empowerment is a phenomenon that is high on the agenda of the SDM. At present<br />

the district has 49% representation of women Mayors in the district. The SDM is one of the<br />

<strong>District</strong>s in Limpopo that has elevated the status of women in municipal governance. Women<br />

should be encouraged to partake in developmental projects that would assist them to get out<br />

of the poverty line that they found themselves in. This means that resources should be<br />

channeled in the direction of women empowerment projects in order to empower them<br />

economically and politically.<br />

Children’s Development programmes<br />

The Office of the Executive Mayor’s Special Programs support children development through<br />

· Support to Early Childhood development Centre’s with Groceries and learning<br />

materials<br />

· Annual celebration of children’s day<br />

Challenges encountered in children’s programs are<br />

· Unorganized children sector makes it difficult for mobilization of support<br />

· Lack of early childhood facilities in our communities<br />

· Lack of resources to support community initiatives and programs on children’s<br />

development<br />

Aged Development Programmes<br />

· Celebration of Social Development Month<br />

· Mandela Day Celebration and campaign<br />

· Ongoing support to pension committees and events for the elderly<br />

Traditional Leadership<br />

Historically, the institution of traditional leadership has been relegated to the periphery of<br />

development. Land was developed by the traditional leaders to participate in the decision


245<br />

make exercise of their own destiny. Their communities blamed them of their<br />

unscrupulousness and their lack of vision in the future. The new political dispensation has<br />

brought another side of this institution that shows that they have been the makers of their<br />

own history in the past and they should be given opportunity to play their role. The SDM has<br />

played a significant role in making sure that traditional leadership is broad on board to assist<br />

in bringing service delivery to their communities. The SDM is confident to pronounce that the<br />

relationship between itself, the institution and all local municipalities is healthy. The<br />

challenge which is there is on who should be the custodian of development in their areas of<br />

jurisdiction. They do not agree with democratically elected municipal structures in the<br />

delivery of services. They prefer partnership rather than exclusionary type of development.<br />

IGR and International Relations<br />

The Constitution of the republic of South Africa has declared that the government should<br />

have three layers which are Local, Provincial and National spheres. These three spheres<br />

should be interdependent, interrelated and independent. It is therefore indicated that all<br />

organs of state should promote and facilitate intergovernmental relations within the context<br />

of cooperative governance. This is done to encourage information sharing. In terms of<br />

International Relations, the SDM has a Twinning Agreement with the City of Johannesburg<br />

and it is forging relations with Botswana.<br />

A. Challenges of this area<br />

· Poor coordination of special programmes intervention by all government<br />

Institutions<br />

· Under-Funding of programmes targeting vulnerable groups<br />

· Special programmes still seen as a peripheral issue<br />

· Communication not reaching all the targeted people<br />

3.7.5. Performance Management System (PMS)<br />

Introduction<br />

PMS is simply a system of managing performance. It provides a set of tools and techniques<br />

to plan, monitor, measure and review performance of the organization and individuals. The<br />

system ensures that all parts of the organization work together to achieve the goals and<br />

targets of the organization. Performance Management System and the <strong>IDP</strong> process are<br />

seamlessly integrated. Whereas the <strong>IDP</strong> fulfills the planning stage of Performance<br />

Management, Performance Management intern fulfills the implementation management,<br />

monitoring and evaluation of the <strong>IDP</strong>. PMS should provide diagnostic signals of the potential<br />

risks that are likely linked to implementation of the <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />

Status Quo


246<br />

- PMS in SDM, regardless of not having a PMS Manager since 2012, is doing fairly<br />

well<br />

- Compliance is adhered to at all times. Though we have challenges now and then of<br />

late submission of reports to CoGHSTA due to reasons beyond our control, SDM<br />

does strive to comply at all times;<br />

Challenges<br />

- Setting unrealistic targets;<br />

- Late submission of reports;<br />

- Negative perceptions and attitudes with regard to performance in general;<br />

- PMS Manager’s post has been vacant since 2011.<br />

3.7.6. High Level Delivery Areas Status Quo for 2012-<strong>2013</strong><br />

Table 99: High level delivery areas status quo for 2012-13<br />

Key high level delivery Detailed activities Status quo 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />

areas<br />

Provision of executive<br />

support services<br />

2 youth programme held<br />

Monitor the implementation<br />

and impact of special<br />

programmes<br />

· Provide strategic<br />

linkages for special<br />

programmes<br />

· Facilitate youth,<br />

children and women<br />

empowerment<br />

· Advocate for<br />

integration of people<br />

living with disability in<br />

economic and social<br />

transformation<br />

2 children events held<br />

3 people living disability<br />

programmes held<br />

2 women programmes held<br />

80% implementation of<br />

communication strategy<br />

undertaken<br />

3 strategic events held<br />

Management of<br />

communication services<br />

· Monitor effective<br />

communication and<br />

marketing services<br />

· Promote public<br />

relations<br />

· Coordinate events<br />

management<br />

12 Mayoral committee<br />

sessions held<br />

Render administrative<br />

support to Executive<br />

· Coordinate and liaise<br />

with external<br />

stakeholders on<br />

behalf of the


247<br />

Render administration<br />

support<br />

Internal audit<br />

Risk management<br />

executive<br />

Customer care services<br />

· Provide customer<br />

care services<br />

· Render call center<br />

services<br />

· Attend to customer<br />

enquiries<br />

Public participation<br />

· Facilitate public<br />

participation and<br />

public relations<br />

Secretariat<br />

· Provide support to<br />

council<br />

· Maintain records for<br />

council<br />

· Provide secretariat<br />

services to council<br />

To provide with an<br />

independent, objective<br />

assurance and consulting<br />

activity designed to add<br />

value and improve an<br />

organisation’s controls, risk<br />

management and<br />

governance processes<br />

through:<br />

· Regularity audits<br />

· Performance audits<br />

· Information<br />

systems/IT audits<br />

· Investigations and<br />

adhoc reports<br />

To manage risk management<br />

function in line with corporate<br />

management strategy by<br />

undertaking:<br />

· Risk assessment<br />

10 public consultations on<br />

annual report held<br />

4 training programmes for<br />

councillors undertaken<br />

6 oversight reports issued<br />

12 speaker’s outreach held<br />

100% compilation of council<br />

agenda completed<br />

24 internal audit reports<br />

issued<br />

4 performance audit reports<br />

issued<br />

4 ICT audit reports issued<br />

100% approval of internal<br />

audit plan and<br />

implementation completed<br />

4 adhoc reports issued<br />

100% approval of internal<br />

audit methodology and<br />

charters<br />

100% internal control<br />

mechanisms undertaken<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> risk assessment<br />

undertaken<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> project risk<br />

assessment undertaken


248<br />

· Risk financing<br />

· Anti-fraud and<br />

corruption measures<br />

· Risk control<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> project survey<br />

done<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>2013</strong> insurance policy<br />

reviewed<br />

Integrated Development<br />

Planning<br />

Preparation of process plan<br />

for <strong>IDP</strong><br />

Compile <strong>IDP</strong><br />

Facilitate community<br />

participation processes<br />

Liaise with sector<br />

departments for alignment<br />

purposes<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> excess and<br />

insurance repairs done<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> security<br />

operations assessment<br />

completed<br />

Approved business continuity<br />

framework and business<br />

continuity plan<br />

Risk management training<br />

conducted<br />

Risk management reports<br />

issued<br />

Process plan for 2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />

<strong>IDP</strong> done<br />

Public consultations for<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> done<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> 2012/<strong>2013</strong> approved by<br />

council


249<br />

CHAPTER 4:<br />

STRATEGY PHASE


250<br />

4.1. VISION<br />

“Development oriented Leader in Service Delivery”<br />

4.2. MISSION<br />

We provide creative integrated development solutions in partnership with Local<br />

Municipalities, Communities and other stakeholders through:<br />

- a coordinated framework for district development planning;<br />

- fostering active community involvement<br />

- creating a learning organization conducive for development of human capital;<br />

- enhancing sound intergovernmental relations through good governance;<br />

- equitable distribution of resources.<br />

4.3. CORE VALUES OF THE MUNICIPALITY (BATHO PELE<br />

PRINCIPLES)<br />

Institutions in every environment are governed by a set of core values that bind both political<br />

and administrative personnel. The <strong>District</strong> regards the below mentioned core values as the<br />

cornerstone that should guide the municipality in conducting its affairs as per the <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />

· Transparency<br />

· Access<br />

· Courtesy<br />

· Efficiency<br />

· Value for money<br />

· professionalism<br />

· Redress<br />

4.4. MAYORAL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES<br />

· Economic Growth, Development and Job Creation<br />

· Access to Basic Services and Infrastructure Development<br />

· Community Development and Social Cohesion<br />

· Spatial Development and Sustainable Land Use Management<br />

· Active Community Participation and Inter-Governmental Co-operation<br />

· Effective, Accountable and Clean Government.


251<br />

4.4.1. Economic Growth, Development and Job Creation<br />

Envisaged outputs<br />

Development should be people-centered and not a government driven scenario wherein<br />

communities are recipients of government services. Building an increased prosperity for all<br />

residents, sustainable job and income generation and better distribution of wealth, is central<br />

to the municipality’s challenges. In order to ensure this objective it is thus critical that people<br />

participate in the main stream economy of the <strong>District</strong> and the social development of<br />

communities. This will ensure that communities of the district are part of service delivery as<br />

active agents.<br />

Key programmes:<br />

Among programmes to be engaged in this exercise are:<br />

· Enterprise Development<br />

· Agricultural Development<br />

· Tourism Development<br />

· Mining Development<br />

· Marketing<br />

· Investment Attraction<br />

· Expanded Public Works Programmes<br />

· People’s Skills Development<br />

4.4.2. Access to Basic Services and Infrastructure<br />

Envisaged outputs:<br />

Provision of infrastructure also pays an important role in the social and economic<br />

development of communities. Areas without access to infrastructure are characterized by<br />

high levels of poverty whilst those with access are well off. Absence of infrastructure for any<br />

kind of services worsens the poverty levels of communities as much as it hampers<br />

development.<br />

The municipality is therefore faced with two challenges in this area:<br />

- First is the issue of extending access to basic municipal services (water, sanitation,<br />

electricity and solid waste removal to communities with access.<br />

- The second issue relate to the general provisioning and maintenance of<br />

infrastructure and services over the municipal area.<br />

Key programmes:


252<br />

• In terms of this priority the municipality will develop the following programmes:<br />

• Free basic services programme<br />

• Access to municipal services to areas without<br />

• Water services provisioning and maintenance<br />

• Solid Waste Removal<br />

• Electricity provisioning<br />

• Transport<br />

• Roads<br />

• Storm-water<br />

4.4.3. Community Development and Social Cohesion<br />

Envisaged outputs:<br />

Community development is a critical challenge facing the municipality in an attempt to create<br />

a stable and cohesive community.<br />

Key Programmes:<br />

To this end the following programmes will be embarked upon by the municipality:<br />

· Environmental Management<br />

· Primary Health Care<br />

· Sports Development<br />

· Gender Equity<br />

· Aged Care<br />

· Skills Development<br />

· Disaster Management<br />

· Safety and Security<br />

4.4.4. Spatial Development and Sustainable Land Use Management<br />

Envisaged outputs:<br />

The desired development requires resources to happen of which among them is land. Land<br />

unlike other resources is a finite resource which has to be addressed strategically. The<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> Municipal area has its own dynamics related to land as most of the land for<br />

development is under land restitution claims. It is thus critical that concerted efforts be<br />

embarked upon by the municipality to facilitate access to land for sustainable development<br />

as well as usage.<br />

Key Programmes:<br />

As a result the following will be among the key programmes:


253<br />

· Spatial planning to guide sustainable development;<br />

· Support programmes for beneficiaries of land restitution claims;<br />

· Undertaking of land audits to identify land for various kinds of development;<br />

· Facilitate the development of framework for land use management;<br />

· Trainings and consultation sessions with various stakeholders on land use management<br />

practices.<br />

4.4.5. Active Community Participation and Inter-governmental Alignment<br />

Envisaged outputs:<br />

Government programmes ought to be communicated to its communities so as they can<br />

measure the performance of government and hold it accountable. The municipality wishes to<br />

engage in a contract with its communities in addressing the challenge of poverty,<br />

unemployment, and service delivery. In this case the municipality will ensure that proper<br />

structures are put in where government will plan with the communities and monitor<br />

implementation. A clear communications framework will thus be instituted by the<br />

municipality.<br />

Key Programme:<br />

The focus on this programme will be:<br />

• Functionality of all communication structures representing communities as well as all<br />

stakeholders,<br />

• Working with community development workers in communicating planned and<br />

implemented government programmes,<br />

• Monitoring of government programmes on their social and economic impact.<br />

• Furthermore in accordance with the spirit of co-operative governance as well as the<br />

legislative requirements, the municipality will work with local municipalities; provincial<br />

and national sector departments to ensure that development is integrated, duplication<br />

is avoided; and synergy is enhanced. To realize this objective the municipality will set<br />

proper institutional structures and mechanisms to ensure that such co-operation is<br />

not ad-hoc.<br />

4.4.6. Accountable and Clean Government<br />

Envisaged outcome/outputs<br />

The development of institutional capacity is a key priority to ensure that the <strong>District</strong> is<br />

equipped with high-quality staff that ensures that government programmes are implemented<br />

according to set targets.


254<br />

Key programmes:<br />

In this area of priority the <strong>District</strong> will focus on:<br />

· Recruitment and selection of high-quality and committed staff<br />

· The retention of staff<br />

· The development of the skills of its staff<br />

· Engaging in partnerships with strategic partners<br />

· Organizational Development<br />

· Human Resource Administration and Maintenance<br />

· The development of administrative systems<br />

· Secretariat and Administration Services<br />

· Information Management<br />

· Internal Communication<br />

· Performance Management<br />

· Customer care<br />

Government programmes cannot be realized if they are not backed by financial resources.<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> is faced with mammoth development challenges amidst limited<br />

resources. It is therefore paramount that the existing resources are well managed whilst<br />

striving for the mobilization of extra resources. In order to do so the municipality will<br />

specifically focus on:<br />

· Development of a financial management plan<br />

· Strengthening of revenue collection capacity<br />

· Revenue generation<br />

· Credit Control mechanism<br />

· Financial planning and budgeting<br />

· Financial reporting<br />

· Asset Management<br />

· Financial Administration<br />

· Expenditure Management and Control<br />

· Preparation of realistic and strategic budgets<br />

· Implementation of Municipal Financial Management Act<br />

· Internal Audit<br />

· Risk Management<br />

4.5. SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

STRATEGIES


255<br />

Provision of municipal office space Construction of mini municipal offices<br />

Groblersdal<br />

Upgrading of existing building Hoep<br />

Hoep Street<br />

Construction of new offices Jane Furse<br />

GIS Training and Hardware<br />

Training of municipal officials on GIS<br />

Provision of hardware and software<br />

related to GIS<br />

Improve environmental quality Enforce environmental management<br />

tools<br />

Promote infill development<br />

Maximum use and protection of high<br />

potential Land<br />

Reduce sprawl<br />

Upgrading of tenure and formalization of<br />

informal settlements which would<br />

facilitate investment and borrowing<br />

capacity<br />

Eradication of informal settlement Encouragement of integrated and<br />

Compact Settlement<br />

Develop an integrated and sustainable<br />

transportation node that promotes a<br />

quality public realm and pedestrian<br />

movement.<br />

Refurbishment and development of<br />

infrastructure and facilities<br />

Determine priority areas for shortmedium<br />

term investment and allocation<br />

of future development<br />

Provision of appropriate housing for all<br />

social groups<br />

Improved Basic Services Delivery and<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Alignment of the SDM spatial<br />

development plan to the sector plans<br />

Perform audit and enforce municipal bylaws<br />

relating to illegal land audit<br />

Encourage tourism facilities<br />

Identify strategic land parcels for<br />

development<br />

Upgrading of tenure and formalization of<br />

informal settlements which would<br />

facilitate investment and borrowing<br />

capacity<br />

Upgrading of tenure and formalization of<br />

informal settlements which would<br />

facilitate investment and borrowing<br />

capacity<br />

Assess the aspects of compatibility and<br />

possible contradiction which would then<br />

be addressed<br />

4.6. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL<br />

TRANSFORMATION


256<br />

4.6.1. Employee wellness<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Effective and efficient management of<br />

workplace hazards<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Organize recreational activities<br />

4.6.2. Occupational health and safety<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

- To enhance wellness of employees<br />

- To ensure healthy and safe work<br />

environment.<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

- Through reactive and proactive<br />

wellness activities<br />

- By managing workplace hazards<br />

efficiently and effectively<br />

- Identification, investigation and<br />

submission of claims/returns to<br />

commissioner under Department of<br />

Labour<br />

- Facilitation of medical<br />

surveillance/check-ups for employees<br />

- Buildings inspection and audit of<br />

municipal service areas (buildings<br />

and service points)<br />

- By conducting regular wellness<br />

campaigns<br />

- By managing injuries in the<br />

workplace<br />

4.6.3. Information and Communication Technology (ICT)<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Establish ICT as a business driver<br />

To reduce the digital divide throughout the<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

To fully get all systems to integrate and<br />

databases of the various systems to<br />

communicate<br />

To reduce ICT Risks<br />

To reduce ICT Audit Queries through the<br />

development of a proper ICT Strategy.<br />

To adopt an ICT Framework through which<br />

ICT can be governed<br />

To put a proper ICT Disaster Recovery<br />

Strategy in place and to ensure the<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

By conducting needs analysis<br />

By maintaining ICT infrastructure<br />

By improving ICT security<br />

By developing a Master Plan<br />

By establishing sound regulatory<br />

environment<br />

By extending ICT Infrastructure <strong>District</strong> wide<br />

By implementing the E-Governance Strategy


257<br />

effectiveness thereof<br />

To replace all redundant equipment as<br />

identified and appoint a service provider to<br />

speed up the turn-around time<br />

By developing a proper ICT Strategy for<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> in line with<br />

the E-Governance Strategy<br />

To budget properly for each financial year By adopting an ICT Framework for<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

To improve on the turn-around time for enduser<br />

By maintaining ICT infrastructure<br />

support<br />

To reduce ICT expenditure by implementing By extending ICT Infrastructure <strong>District</strong> wide<br />

Shared Services throughout the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

To have an effective Information and By maintaining ICT infrastructure<br />

Communication Technology in place<br />

4.6.4. Human Resources Management (HRM)<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Provision of sound human resources<br />

functions<br />

To recruit competent personnel<br />

To reduce staff turnover<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

By implementing HR Plan<br />

By implementing employment equity targets<br />

By reviewing and implementing human<br />

resources systems<br />

By developing and implementing careerpathing<br />

plans<br />

By reviewing and implementing Retention<br />

strategy<br />

By filling vacant posts and improving service<br />

benefits<br />

Implementation of retention strategy<br />

To effectively and efficiently administer leave<br />

management<br />

To ensure that correct salaries and third<br />

party payments are done on time<br />

To ensure compliance with Employment<br />

Equity Plan (EEP)<br />

To ensure compliance to HR policies<br />

Implementing ESS and manual system<br />

efficiently<br />

Use VIP and Cash Focus systems for<br />

payments<br />

Implementation of numeric targets as per<br />

EEP<br />

Implement SALGA collective agreements<br />

and relevant pieces of legislation<br />

4.6.5. Auxiliary Services<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Provide sound records management<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

By reviewing the file plan


258<br />

To provide safe-keeping of the records (files<br />

and tender documents)<br />

To promote clean audit in the SDM<br />

To provide distribution of information through<br />

messenger services internally and externally<br />

To provide printing and photocopying<br />

services<br />

By implementing the Electronic Document<br />

Management System<br />

By disposing of records<br />

By archiving records of value<br />

By auditing personnel files<br />

Separation of printing and photocopying<br />

office from Records Office<br />

Provision of registers for outgoing and<br />

incoming records<br />

Electronic storage of documents<br />

Schedule of delivering and collecting mail<br />

internally<br />

Determining a schedule of types of records<br />

the SDM has<br />

<strong>Review</strong> the file plan<br />

Disposing and archiving of records<br />

By managing and auditing personnel files<br />

4.6.6. Legal Services<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

To provide effective and efficient legal<br />

services<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

By appointing a panel of attorneys<br />

By providing legal support to departments<br />

By providing legislative updates<br />

Effective communication and flow of<br />

information between legal services and<br />

affected departments<br />

Gaps in the procedure manual that is in<br />

place filled to address the challenges<br />

Advise various departments to make<br />

requests for opinions in writing<br />

To expeditiously attend to all legal queries<br />

affecting the institution in order to avoid<br />

unnecessary litigations<br />

Provide Council with Legislative review<br />

updates report in order for institution to be in<br />

line new legislative trends.<br />

Request various departments consult legal<br />

services timeously to avoid unnecessary<br />

litigations<br />

Update Council as well as the departments<br />

on Legislative <strong>Review</strong> Updates<br />

4.6.7. Labour Relations<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

STRATEGIES


259<br />

Promotion of sound labour relations<br />

To maintain harmonious relationship<br />

between the employer and employees<br />

To consciountise employee about<br />

labour related matters<br />

To ensure that the employer and<br />

employee representatives have<br />

common understanding<br />

To promote orderly collective<br />

bargaining<br />

To promote effective and efficient<br />

resolution of labour disputes<br />

To give effect to the provisions of<br />

Labour Relations Act<br />

To conscientize employees on labour<br />

matters<br />

By conducting awareness on labour<br />

relations<br />

By maintaining a functional Labour<br />

Relations Forum<br />

Educate employees about labour<br />

relations matters<br />

Facilitate negotiations between<br />

employer and employee<br />

representatives<br />

Strike management<br />

Labour related training to ensure that<br />

managers carry out their duties without<br />

fear or favour<br />

Develop relationship with all five local<br />

municipalities<br />

Educate employees about labour<br />

relations matters<br />

4.6.8. Organisational Development (OD)<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

To improve institutional productivity<br />

To continuously analyze the performance of<br />

the organizational structure in order to apply<br />

appropriate OD interventions<br />

To continuously assess respective<br />

departments on their quarterly reports or<br />

observations<br />

To design forms for efficiency and<br />

effectiveness<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

By improving and implementing business<br />

processes<br />

By evaluating the organisational structure<br />

By conducting culture surveys<br />

By conducting job evaluations<br />

By implementing performance management<br />

framework<br />

Apply total quality management<br />

Business processes be developed and<br />

implemented for the entire municipality<br />

Conduct job evaluation<br />

4.6.9. Human Resources Development (HRD)<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

To equip the people of SDM with skills for<br />

participation in the mainstream economy<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

By developing and submitting the Workplace<br />

Skills Plan to LGSETA


260<br />

By identifying skills programmes and<br />

including them in the Workplace Skills Plan<br />

To provide learners who completed their<br />

studies with experience and complete their<br />

workplace experience<br />

To assist employees to acquire recognised<br />

qualification on experience gained in the<br />

workplace<br />

To capacitate newly elected Councillors<br />

By creating opportunities for experiential<br />

learning<br />

By assessing the impact of training<br />

interventions<br />

4.7. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE<br />

4.7.1. Water<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Provision of water supply to all Develop, Implement & Completion of 50%<br />

of bulk water projects<br />

To implement an Incidents Register and Implementation of water reticulation<br />

Effective resolution of water supply incidents (65% of backlog)<br />

To ensure effective operations of Bulk Water<br />

Services<br />

To effectively provide Water through Water<br />

Tankers<br />

To provide Safe disposal of Waste Water<br />

To ensure effective management of SLAs with<br />

Water Services Providers (WSPs)<br />

To develop an Integrated Asset Management<br />

Plan<br />

To review WSDP<br />

To develop Water and Sanitation Master Plans<br />

To efficiently manage the MIG Programme<br />

To efficiently manage RBIG and RBIG Special<br />

Programme<br />

To efficiently manage the ACIP Programme<br />

To efficiently manage the DWA refurbishment<br />

Programme<br />

To develop a Water Conservation and Water<br />

Demand Management Plan<br />

To develop close-out reports on Incomplete<br />

roads projects<br />

To effectively complete activities of the Annual<br />

Implementation Plan on Rural Roads Asset<br />

Management (R-RAMS)<br />

Implement a Water Conservation and<br />

Water Demand Management Strategy<br />

(Reduce nonrevenue water to 40%)<br />

Achieve 95% Blue Drop rating<br />

Eradication of supply through tankers<br />

50%<br />

Achieve70% Green Drop rating<br />

Annual review and implementation of<br />

WSDP<br />

Improve implementation and monitoring<br />

Conduct a study on water demand and<br />

conservation<br />

Follow-up and finalise issues on incomplete<br />

roads projects<br />

Follow up and finalise on issues of R-RAMS


261<br />

To effectively control internal resources<br />

(Human; Financial; etc.)<br />

Improve on monitoring of work done<br />

4.7.2. Sanitation<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Provision of sanitation services to all<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Completion of bulk Sanitation Projects<br />

Provision of household sanitation<br />

facilities (60% of backlog)<br />

Achieve70% Green Drop rating<br />

4.7.3. Disaster Management<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

To provide for an integrated and<br />

coordinate disaster management policy<br />

that focuses on preventing or reducing<br />

the risk of disasters<br />

Institutional capacity in disaster<br />

Management<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Compile specifications mitigating the<br />

severity of disasters, emergency<br />

preparedness, rapid and effective<br />

response to disasters and post<br />

disaster recovery for tender<br />

Design job content and submit to HR<br />

To decrease overtime expenditure.<br />

Create employment and avoid staff<br />

being over worked<br />

Recruitment and selection<br />

Interviews and appointment<br />

Advertise posts and speed up<br />

appointments of qualified incumbents<br />

To avoid litigation. Failure to respond<br />

adequately. Comply to norms and<br />

standards<br />

To use the correct vehicle for a defined<br />

function. Respond appropriately to veld<br />

and forest fires. Reduce the response<br />

time<br />

<strong>District</strong> has an obligation to render the<br />

service in these areas. Fear of loss of<br />

Match the risk by employing more fire<br />

fighter and provide for resources<br />

Extend the water services contract to<br />

EMS. Specifications will be provided.<br />

Apply for MIG funding. Ask funding


262<br />

life and property. Fear of possible<br />

litigation. Places are far from the<br />

existing fire departments<br />

Save lives and property<br />

To avail classrooms occupied by<br />

instructors and disaster officers. Better<br />

record and information management<br />

Compliance to the provisions of DMA<br />

To reduce the response time. To save<br />

life and property. Accessibility of the<br />

service to the SDM population<br />

To have the head of the training<br />

centre. To fulfill the LGSETA<br />

requirement on accreditation and<br />

evaluation and monitoring<br />

Required by the ministerial<br />

proclamation that a service will have<br />

fire safety officers to deal with issues<br />

of fire prevention. To enforce the EMS<br />

by-laws. To ensure sustainable<br />

development<br />

To increase the EMS fleet<br />

To comply with enabler 1. Build DRM<br />

information. To comply to DMA section<br />

44 ( c) – must act as a repository of,<br />

and conduit for, information concerning<br />

disasters, impending disasters and<br />

disaster management in the municipal<br />

area<br />

To fulfill all the KPAs and the enablers.<br />

To manage the centre. Response to<br />

incidents.<br />

from the mining communities<br />

Establishing satellite stations/fire<br />

houses<br />

Apply for MIG funding and build an<br />

office block at the fire station, space is<br />

available<br />

Acquire land around Jane Furse.<br />

COGHSTA Limpopo is willing to fund<br />

the centre<br />

Identify and rent space. Build satellite<br />

or fire houses. Use volunteers in terms<br />

of the volunteer policy<br />

Create, advertise and appoint the head<br />

of centre<br />

Have an Organogram that has the<br />

head of the training academy and link<br />

each instructor to the fields available<br />

at training<br />

Use money paid off by insurance to<br />

fund another EMS vehicle. Pay lease<br />

of fleet with the money paid off<br />

Add five (5) officers to deal with the<br />

remaining KPAs and the Enabler 1 and<br />

2. GIS specialist<br />

Develop an Organogram that has fire<br />

prevention added to it. Headed by a<br />

divisional officer with five inspectors


263<br />

The field workers being efficient.<br />

Increase communication effectiveness<br />

and mobility in the shortage of pool<br />

vehicles<br />

To sustain the buildings and keep the<br />

working place safe for employees<br />

Apply the cell phone allowance and car<br />

allowance policies without<br />

discrimination<br />

Delegate financial powers of R500.00<br />

to the Director Community Services<br />

and they be allowed to procure on a<br />

manual order of three quotations<br />

Budget for the soft and hard ware<br />

4.7.4. Environmental Management<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> needs to have more of<br />

Environmental Inspectors to implement and<br />

educate all about the legislations pertinent to<br />

biodiversity and conservation on a Lahore<br />

and long term measures.<br />

Shortly SDM must starts to have more<br />

Environmental Inspector’s interns to educate<br />

the communities in the area about greening<br />

and conservation of the area including fauna<br />

and flora.<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Create positions for Environmental<br />

Management Inspectors who will also<br />

generate revenue for the district through<br />

fines<br />

Bylaws should also be promulgated relating<br />

to the subject and be passed.<br />

Employ more environment Inspectors interns<br />

Embark on an intensive campaign for<br />

education by providing resources<br />

4.7.5 Sports, Arts and Culture<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

To develop communities in Sport through<br />

mass participation<br />

To develop qualified coaches,<br />

administrators, referees and umpires within<br />

the district<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Establish athletics clubs, Train coaches.<br />

Invite professional runners. Sector Plan and<br />

Concept document available<br />

Train coaches, referees and administrator<br />

and engage stakeholders for exchange<br />

programmes. Sector Plan and Concept<br />

document available<br />

Recruit coaches, managers, Officiating<br />

Officials


264<br />

Provide sporting material and resources to<br />

Sports Academy<br />

To develop communities in Arts and Culture<br />

through mass participation<br />

Promotion of Arts and Culture within the<br />

<strong>District</strong>.<br />

To build a community culture of practicing<br />

sports and recreation as a lifestyle<br />

To preserve and promote the arts and<br />

cultures of the diverse communities of<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

To maximize available resources and obtain,<br />

where necessary, assistance from other<br />

funding agencies or private sector sources<br />

To improve the quality of life of all sections of<br />

community through effective policies on<br />

sports, arts and culture<br />

To coordinate the creation of high quality<br />

sports and recreation facilities that allows for<br />

hosting of provincial and national events<br />

Organise accredited courses<br />

Needs analysis<br />

Establish arts and culture groups<br />

Introduce new federation<br />

Establish new federations<br />

Sustain the existing federations<br />

Capacitate Artists and Crafters. Sector Plan<br />

and Arts and Culture Strategy document<br />

available<br />

Promote Cultural Activities<br />

Celebrate Heritage<br />

Promote Languages<br />

Organise Writers/Authors and Debates<br />

Recruit Artists and Crafters<br />

Train Artists and Crafters<br />

Promoting sports and recreation activities in<br />

the district<br />

Organise elderly from Wards<br />

21,1 km Race<br />

10 km Race and 10 km walk<br />

5km Fun Run<br />

Hosting events that commemorate the arts<br />

and culture of communities of <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />

Organise debates in partnership with Dept.<br />

of Education and other stakeholders<br />

Sustain lifestyle strategy<br />

Integrate programmes<br />

Integrate Programmes with stakeholders<br />

Sector Plan and Arts and Culture Strategy<br />

document available<br />

4.7.6. Emergency management<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Repair and maintain equipment<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Repair and maintain equipment


265<br />

Save life, property and the environment<br />

through quick response to veld fires<br />

Effective and efficient response to all types<br />

of fire<br />

Provision of protective clothing and station<br />

uniform<br />

Provision of emergency disaster relief<br />

material to victims<br />

Encourage continued professional<br />

development and membership with<br />

professional bodies<br />

Public education, research and awareness<br />

Reduce the road fatalities and promote<br />

Arrive Alive<br />

Provide training material and resources to<br />

Training Academy<br />

Provide for training academy requirements<br />

and resources<br />

Repair of equipment as and when needed<br />

Compile list of equipment to be serviced and<br />

maintained<br />

Appointment of term contractors for<br />

servicing, maintenance and repairs<br />

Save life, property and the environment<br />

through quick response to veld fires.<br />

Effective and efficient response to all types<br />

of fire<br />

Provision of protective clothing and station<br />

uniform<br />

Develop list of protective and station uniform<br />

needed<br />

Compile list of foam and decontamination<br />

detergent types and quantities per station<br />

Provision of emergency disaster relief<br />

material to victims<br />

Appoint term contractors for supply of food<br />

and food parcels, first day of disaster<br />

happening<br />

Provide relief material as and when needed<br />

Encourage continued professional<br />

development and membership with<br />

professional bodies<br />

Develop a list of employees that are<br />

registered with professional bodies<br />

Public education, research and awareness<br />

Develop an annual program for awareness<br />

Reduce the road fatalities and promote<br />

Arrive Alive<br />

Develop an Integrated Arrive Alive<br />

Operational Plan<br />

Launch the Arrive Alive and implement the<br />

plan<br />

Provide training material and resources to<br />

Training Academy<br />

Compile specifications for training resources<br />

Provide for training academy requirements<br />

and resources<br />

Do research on the vulnerability of the<br />

<strong>District</strong> to certain hazards<br />

Request or search for funding partners


266<br />

4.7.7. Municipal Health Services<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Provision of adequate Air Quality Monitoring<br />

Facilities in the <strong>District</strong><br />

Provision of all nine functional areas<br />

constituting MHS<br />

To implement the HIV Mainstreaming<br />

strategy<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Get the existing AQMI into continuous and<br />

efficient functionality<br />

Build enough capacity to carry Atmospheric<br />

Emission Licensing function from the<br />

Province<br />

Provide additional monitoring equipment’s to<br />

other locals<br />

Compile MHS strategy and get it approved<br />

by all council structures<br />

Getting personnel acclimatised and putting<br />

systems and processes in place for full<br />

implementation of all nine programmes<br />

Gazetting of By-laws<br />

List all the days that deal with HIV/Aids<br />

Getting personnel acclimatised and putting<br />

systems and processes in place for full<br />

implementation of all nine programmes<br />

Placing them in strategic organic<br />

specialisation for future personal<br />

development<br />

4.8. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (LED)<br />

4.8.1. LED<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

To provide SMME/cooperatives support<br />

To provide Market exhibitions for SMME’s<br />

To create conducive environment for<br />

sustainable economic growth and<br />

development.<br />

Identify and explore value adding<br />

opportunities<br />

To promote the development of tourism<br />

destinations and opportunities<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Support SMME’s and cooperatives with<br />

production inputs<br />

Expose SMME’s to market exhibitions<br />

By facilitating access to markets<br />

By facilitating and promoting development of<br />

tourism destinations and products


267<br />

Seminars for local suppliers on supply chain<br />

Conduct seminars for small businesses on<br />

supply chain processes<br />

4.8.2. SDA<br />

Objectives of SDA<br />

To promote sustainable rural economies<br />

through agricultural and agro-processing<br />

development<br />

To ensure small town and settlement<br />

regeneration<br />

To develop and market key tourism clusters<br />

To develop sustainable mining communities<br />

Committed and hardworking employees<br />

Supportive and united board of directors<br />

Clear mandate encapsulated in the SDA bylaw<br />

Strategies of SDA<br />

Development of agro-processing<br />

initiatives<br />

Regeneration of small towns in<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Tourism development and marketing<br />

SLP and Enterprise Development<br />

Raise the motivation of workers<br />

Share the vision and mission of SDA<br />

Formulate the mandate in a way that is<br />

accessible to all<br />

Elaboration on strategies of SDA<br />

The <strong>2013</strong>-18 strategy makes a fundamental shift towards a programme-based approach (as<br />

against project pre-occupation) guided by the quest to maximize on spatially focused and<br />

concentrated development. Central to the thesis is to pursue an empirically based model of<br />

development in targeted spaces. The common thread to the design of projects for specific<br />

geographic locations will either be multiple infrastructure projects that are interlinked and<br />

aimed at unlocking development potential/opportunities and/or making use of an identified<br />

product with a clearly articulated value chain as a bedrock for triggering development within<br />

a particular space. Such programmes may span a number of inter-linked geographic spaces<br />

that however need to be complementary to each other.<br />

The choice to either centralize or spread investments will be determined through proper<br />

feasibility studies that take into consideration that viability of locations, cost of development<br />

and the potential to realise shared growth. SDA’s role in the game remains that of conceiving<br />

the programmes, identifying the requisite resources (both public and private), facilitating<br />

mobilization thereof and helping negotiate mutually acceptable institutional models for their<br />

execution.<br />

Below is a summary of the criteria to be used to assess appropriateness/fit of programmes;<br />

• Possess spatial character


268<br />

• Revolves around identified commodity and has potential to pursue opportunities<br />

along the value chain or could result in further development of complimentary<br />

services<br />

• Complement the development of sectors that the district has competitive advantage<br />

on<br />

• Potential for economic sustainability<br />

• Has sufficient critical support & commitment from local municipalities and SDM – be<br />

able to flow into <strong>IDP</strong>s and not solely dependent on private sector contribution<br />

• Extensive profiling and assessment is done on current developments in the targeted<br />

areas<br />

• High potential to attract private sector investment<br />

4.9. FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OBJECTIVES ON FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

STRATEGIES ON FIN.VIABILITY<br />

To ensure sufficient reserve funds to<br />

address asset renewal<br />

To ensure preparation and<br />

implementation of realistic budget for<br />

the municipality<br />

To ensure improved Audit Opinion<br />

To ensure that assets and inventory are<br />

adequately accountant for, properly<br />

recorded and safe guarded<br />

To ensure prudent expenditure<br />

management<br />

To ensure proper management of<br />

documents<br />

To ensure accurate and complete<br />

reporting of financial information<br />

To ensure sufficient revenue to address<br />

development imperatives<br />

To ensure the optimum, efficient,<br />

effective functional procurement<br />

processes<br />

Disposal of obsolete and damaged<br />

stock<br />

Preparation and monitoring of realistic<br />

budget<br />

Improve audit opinion<br />

Development of a credible asset<br />

register<br />

Improvement in capital replacement<br />

reserves<br />

Recording and valuing of all municipal<br />

inventory items<br />

Maximisation of own revenue towards<br />

Capital Replacement Reserves<br />

Process all invoices received as per<br />

service standards target date<br />

Adhering to document management<br />

process flow


269<br />

To ensure efficient and effective<br />

contract management<br />

To ensure compliance to all governance<br />

and financial management and reporting<br />

requirements<br />

Reconciliation of payroll and creditors<br />

accounts balance<br />

Percentage revenue collection from<br />

baseline<br />

To ensure timeous and accurate<br />

financial reporting<br />

To ensure a credible and realistic<br />

budget of the municipality<br />

To ensure sufficient revenue to address<br />

development imperatives<br />

To ensure the optimum, efficient,<br />

effective functional procurement<br />

processes. To ensure functional bid<br />

committees<br />

To ensure that Inventory and Assets<br />

(Movable and Immovable) is adequately<br />

accounted for, properly recorded and<br />

safeguarded<br />

To ensure BTO policies are up to date<br />

with regard to legislation<br />

To ensure prudent expenditure<br />

management<br />

To foster Intergovernmental Relations<br />

and engagements with Stakeholders<br />

To effectively control internal resources<br />

(Human; Financial; etc.)<br />

To attain Clean Audit by ensuring<br />

compliance to all governance; financial<br />

management and reporting requirements<br />

To effectively encourage a Risk free<br />

working environment<br />

Procurement of goods and services on<br />

time<br />

Compliance to Supply Chain<br />

Management policies and regulations<br />

Drafting and management of service<br />

level agreements (SLA) for all services<br />

rendered to SDM<br />

Development of GRAP compliant fixed<br />

asset register<br />

Recording, valuation of municipal<br />

assets and Unbundling of<br />

Infrastructural projects<br />

Updating of inventory register<br />

Comply with disposal processes of<br />

asset management<br />

Payment of creditors within 30 days of<br />

invoice date<br />

Converting of documents to electronic<br />

format<br />

Regular performance of expenditure<br />

reconciliations<br />

Cleansing of consumer and indigent<br />

data<br />

Improvement in revenue collection


270<br />

Development and implementation of<br />

procurement plans<br />

Revenue Enhancement<br />

Objectives on revenue enhancement<br />

To create a clean database of customers in<br />

the shortest period enhancing revenue<br />

collection<br />

To ensure that critical resources are availed<br />

to the metering project<br />

To improve accountability and traceability<br />

To improve and maintain water assets<br />

thereby reducing incidences of water losses<br />

To improve management of water losses and<br />

to account for all the unaccounted for<br />

water.<br />

To increase chances of accounting for<br />

unaccounted for water<br />

To create additional revenue<br />

To ensure that businesses and other able<br />

beneficiaries absorb some of the basic costs<br />

for activities that directly benefits them such<br />

as inspections and training<br />

To create revenue through offering<br />

valuable services<br />

Strategies on revenue enhancement<br />

Compile and verify list of all consumers<br />

within the district<br />

Negotiate prioritization of allocating<br />

payments on the respective LM’s invoices<br />

on financial systems, suggesting as follows:<br />

o Rates & taxes<br />

o Water & Sanitation<br />

o Electricity<br />

Identify areas of predominant yard<br />

connections, formalize them and bill<br />

Piloting Pre-paid meters<br />

Replacement of critical components<br />

Billing the Owners versus Tenants<br />

Implement Infrastructure refurbishment plan<br />

Developing and implementing loss<br />

management processes<br />

Performing reconciliation of water quantities<br />

produced to quantities billed on a regular<br />

basis<br />

Report on actual losses and take appropriate<br />

action to resolve or reduce these losses<br />

New bulk meters in all zones and at all water<br />

works<br />

Carry out feasibility study of possible new<br />

billable areas<br />

Carry out feasibility study of possible new<br />

billable areas<br />

Institute cost recovery strategy for current<br />

services on offer<br />

Look for new chargeable services to offer


271<br />

4.10. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

4.10.1. Internal Audit<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

• To provide independent, objective<br />

assurance and consulting services.<br />

• To assess and evaluate the municipal<br />

performance management and<br />

information.<br />

• To evaluate and improve the<br />

effectiveness of ICT controls.<br />

• To perform Investigative ad hoc<br />

assignments as requested by Council<br />

and Management.<br />

• To ensure uniform implementation of<br />

internal audit processes and structured<br />

approach.<br />

• To coordinate the activities of the audit<br />

committee.<br />

• To interact with all spheres of<br />

government<br />

• To develop the three year rolling Internal<br />

Audit Plan<br />

• To ensure uniform implementation<br />

• To coordinate the activities of the Audit<br />

committee<br />

• To procure an electronic Internal Audit<br />

working paper system<br />

• To interact with all spheres of<br />

government<br />

• To effectively control Internal resources(<br />

Human; Financial; etc.)<br />

• To attain Clean Audit by ensuring<br />

compliance to all governance; financial<br />

management and reporting requirements<br />

• To effectively encourage a Risk free<br />

working environment.<br />

• Develop and review Internal Audit charter<br />

for approval by Audit Committee and<br />

Council.<br />

• Develop and review [Incorporate IIA<br />

Standards and MFMA regulations]<br />

Internal Audit Methodology for approval<br />

by Audit Committee.<br />

• Develop Internal Audit plan and<br />

implement.<br />

• Market the Internal Audit Function.<br />

• <strong>Review</strong> the ICT systems.<br />

• Perform ad hoc assignment.<br />

• Develop and review Audit Committee<br />

Charter for Approval by Audit Committee<br />

and Council.<br />

• Planning the Audits<br />

• Executing<br />

• Reporting<br />

• Follow Up<br />

• Planning the audit<br />

• Execute<br />

• Obtain risk register from Risk<br />

Management Unit<br />

• Develop the IA Plan<br />

• Submit to Management for Noting<br />

• Submit to AC for approval<br />

• Submit to Municipal council for Noting<br />

• Receive adhoc assignment from<br />

management<br />

• Send the request to audit committee for<br />

approval<br />

• Conduct the assignment and issue final<br />

Report to Management and Audit<br />

committee<br />

• To review the Internal Audit<br />

Methodology<br />

• Submit to Management for Noting<br />

• Submit to AC for Approval<br />

• Submit to Council for Noting<br />

• Issue Notice and Agenda<br />

• Obtain items from different department


272<br />

and package them<br />

• Issue the Audit Packs<br />

• Attend the meetings<br />

• Procurement of working paper system<br />

• Issue notice<br />

• Prepare the document<br />

• Attend the meetings<br />

4.10.2. Risk Management<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

· To conduct risk assessments<br />

· To safeguard the assets of SDM<br />

through alternative techniques of risk<br />

transfer<br />

· To safeguard SDM assets, its<br />

employees and visitors<br />

· To ascertain the level of integrity of<br />

staff and service providers<br />

· To stem out fraud and corruption<br />

activities<br />

· To secure the sustainability of SDM<br />

· To integrate the Risk Management<br />

function into the Performance<br />

Scorecards of directors<br />

· To conduct strategic, operational,<br />

projects and contracts risk<br />

assessments<br />

· To ascertain the level of risk<br />

exposure of SDM by conducting<br />

physical risk surveys on SDM<br />

properties<br />

· To re-establish the Risk Management<br />

Steering Committee and ensure its<br />

functionality<br />

· Ensure proper storage, management<br />

and maintenance of risk management<br />

data and information<br />

· To raise risk management awareness<br />

amongst SDM staff and councillors<br />

through training<br />

· To stem out fraud and corruption<br />

activities within SDM<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

· By appraising the appropriateness of<br />

insurance contracts, review the<br />

adequacy of cover, and renew policy<br />

· By managing the operations of<br />

security services, review the<br />

allocation of security at operational<br />

sites,<br />

· By performing security vetting on staff<br />

and service providers<br />

· By implementing an anti-corruption<br />

strategy and fraud prevention plan<br />

· By developing business continuity<br />

management plan<br />

· By providing training to staff and<br />

councillors<br />

· By compilation of quarterly risk<br />

management and compliance<br />

reports<br />

· By strengthening the cooperation of<br />

governance<br />

· Arrange workshops and interviews<br />

for senior management as per Risk<br />

Management Framework Guidelines<br />

· Develop departmental risk registers,<br />

composite risk register and SDM risk<br />

matrix<br />

· Coordinate the procurement of an<br />

Integrated Risk and Audit<br />

Management System compatible to<br />

SDM’s IT environment<br />

· To develop a Risk Management<br />

Committee Terms of Reference,<br />

appoint members and chairperson<br />

· Provide risk management training to<br />

staff and councillors<br />

· <strong>Review</strong> and implement the Anti-


273<br />

corruption Strategy and a Fraud<br />

Prevention Plan and establish a<br />

Whistle blowing hotline<br />

· Investigate all allegations of fraud<br />

and corruption in consultation with<br />

other state agencies<br />

· Procure a Risk Management<br />

Information Technology system<br />

4.10.3. Communication, Executive support and Special program<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

To integrate youth in the socio-economic<br />

mainstream<br />

To provide support and advocacy on children<br />

rights and their welfare<br />

Ensure adequate caring and protection of the<br />

elderly<br />

To implement Disabled persons policies and<br />

programme’s<br />

To provide support and advocacy on women<br />

and gender development programmes<br />

To forge strong and sustainable civil society<br />

partnership on constitutional values<br />

To provide partnership and support with<br />

Magoshi<br />

To ensure improved communications with<br />

internal and external stakeholders<br />

To ensure integrated marketing of the district<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Drive youth development through capacity<br />

building and implementation of integrated<br />

youth month program<br />

Facilitate integration and alignment of district<br />

initiatives with NYDA<br />

Ensure provision of comprehensive support<br />

to children centres and their programmes<br />

Develop participatory mechanism on national<br />

and provincial children program<br />

Facilitate participation and integration of<br />

elderly people in society in government<br />

programmes<br />

Facilitate integration of people with disability<br />

in the mainstream society though targeted<br />

programmes<br />

Initiate and implement women focal month<br />

programme<br />

Intensity awareness campaigns on<br />

eradication of gender based violence<br />

Mobilise civil society to adhere and observe<br />

charter of positive values<br />

Strengthen social cohesion through culture,<br />

religion and tradition<br />

Implement uniform integrated support to<br />

traditional leaders<br />

Contribute in liberation struggle heritage<br />

Promote IGR<br />

Provide regular newsletter services<br />

Provide marketing platforms for the district<br />

and its products


274<br />

Provide strategic support to Executive<br />

Mayor, enhance social cohesion and nation<br />

building<br />

To ensure support to mayoral committees<br />

and other civic orientated initiatives<br />

Ensure branding in all activities<br />

Support to community media<br />

Stage high quality events<br />

Establishment of project steering committee<br />

Monitoring and evaluation of implementation<br />

Provide content and administrative support<br />

to mayoral committee<br />

4.10.4. Public Participation<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Enhance public participation<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Host Speakers outreach activities<br />

Publicise scheduled council events<br />

Host annual ward committee conference<br />

Host <strong>District</strong> Public Participation forum meeting<br />

Host Speakers’ forum<br />

Host Chief Whip’s forum<br />

Geographic Names Change<br />

4.10.5. Secretariat<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

To hold executive accountable to Council<br />

To develop and or to review policies<br />

To effectively control internal resources<br />

(Human; Financial; etc.)<br />

To attain Clean Audit by ensuring<br />

compliance to all government and reporting<br />

requirements<br />

To effectively encourage a Risk free working<br />

environment<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Oversight<br />

Policy assessment<br />

Internal control<br />

Operation Clean Audit<br />

Risk Management<br />

4.10.6. Clean Audit<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Contribute to the achievement of clean audit<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Conduct a workshop on code of conduct<br />

Declaration of interest forms submitted by all


275<br />

councillors<br />

4.10.7. Councillor Welfare<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Provision of Councillor welfare service<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Attend to councillor queries<br />

Facilitate workshop on Income Tax<br />

4.10.8. Capacity Building<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

Enhance Council Capacity<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Facilitate training for Section 79 committees<br />

Facilitate horizontal learning<br />

4.10.9. Performance Management System (PMS)<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

To ensure proper implementation,<br />

monitoring, measurement and review of<br />

organizational performance<br />

STRATEGIES<br />

Implement the PMS Framework


276<br />

CHAPTER 5: PROJECTS<br />

PHASE


277<br />

5.1. SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />

SPATIAL RATIONALE WITH OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES AND BUDGET<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

Provision of<br />

municipal<br />

office space<br />

Upgrading of<br />

existing<br />

building Hoep<br />

Hoep Street<br />

Construction of<br />

new offices<br />

Jane Furse<br />

Hoep Hoep<br />

Office space<br />

Construction<br />

of municipal<br />

offices and<br />

township<br />

development<br />

(SR/001/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Targe<br />

t<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives to<br />

facilitate<br />

rezoning<br />

approval<br />

undertaken<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertaken<br />

to facilitate<br />

land<br />

acquisition<br />

for offices<br />

4<br />

initiativ<br />

es<br />

4<br />

initiativ<br />

es<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives to<br />

facilitate<br />

rezoning<br />

approval<br />

undertaken<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertaken<br />

to facilitate<br />

land<br />

acquisition<br />

for offices<br />

4<br />

initiativ<br />

es<br />

4<br />

initiativ<br />

es<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives to<br />

facilitate<br />

rezoning<br />

approval<br />

undertaken<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertaken<br />

to facilitate<br />

land<br />

acquisition<br />

for offices<br />

4<br />

initiati<br />

ves<br />

4<br />

initiati<br />

ves<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>: R169,262<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015: R100,000<br />

2015/2015: 100,000<br />

TOTAL: R369,262<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R500,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R513,594.93<br />

2015/2016:R658,361.58<br />

Total: R1,671,956.51<br />

SDM<br />

SDM<br />

GIS Training<br />

and<br />

Hardware<br />

Training of<br />

municipal<br />

officials on GIS<br />

GIS Training<br />

and<br />

Hardware<br />

(SR/002/201<br />

Number of<br />

staff trained<br />

on GIS<br />

usage<br />

5 staff<br />

trained<br />

on GIS<br />

usage<br />

Number of<br />

staff trained<br />

on GIS<br />

usage<br />

5 staff<br />

trained<br />

on GIS<br />

usage<br />

Number of<br />

staff trained<br />

on GIS<br />

usage<br />

5 staff<br />

traine<br />

d on<br />

GIS<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>: R200,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015: R300,000<br />

2015/2016: R200,000<br />

SDM


278<br />

Undertake<br />

land audit for<br />

municipal<br />

works<br />

Provision of<br />

hardware and<br />

software<br />

related to GIS<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>) usage TOTAL: R700,000<br />

Percentage<br />

GIS<br />

hardware<br />

procured<br />

100%<br />

GIS<br />

hardwa<br />

re<br />

procure<br />

Percentage<br />

GIS<br />

hardware<br />

procured<br />

100%<br />

GIS<br />

hardwa<br />

re<br />

procure<br />

Percentage<br />

GIS<br />

hardware<br />

procured<br />

100%<br />

GIS<br />

hardw<br />

are<br />

procur<br />

Land Audit<br />

for municipal<br />

works<br />

(SR/003/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

of land audit<br />

for<br />

municipal<br />

works<br />

d<br />

100%<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

of land audit<br />

for municipal<br />

works<br />

d<br />

100%<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

of land audit<br />

for<br />

municipal<br />

works<br />

ed<br />

100%<br />

compl<br />

etion<br />

N/A<br />

SDM<br />

To facilitate<br />

implementati<br />

on of De<br />

Hoop<br />

Housing<br />

project<br />

To facilitate<br />

Mampuru<br />

township<br />

development<br />

De Hoop<br />

(SR/004/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Mampuru<br />

(SR/005/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertaken<br />

to facilitate<br />

DeHoop<br />

housing<br />

project<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertaken<br />

to facilitate<br />

mampuru<br />

township<br />

developmen<br />

t<br />

12<br />

initiativ<br />

es<br />

underta<br />

ken<br />

4<br />

initiativ<br />

es<br />

underta<br />

ken<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertaken<br />

to facilitate<br />

DeHoop<br />

housing<br />

project<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertaken<br />

to facilitate<br />

mampuru<br />

township<br />

developmen<br />

t<br />

12<br />

initiativ<br />

es<br />

underta<br />

ken<br />

4<br />

initiativ<br />

es<br />

underta<br />

ken<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertaken<br />

to facilitate<br />

DeHoop<br />

housing<br />

project<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertaken<br />

to facilitate<br />

mampuru<br />

township<br />

developmen<br />

t<br />

12<br />

initiati<br />

ves<br />

undert<br />

aken<br />

4<br />

initiati<br />

ves<br />

undert<br />

aken<br />

N/A<br />

N/A<br />

SDM<br />

SDM


279<br />

5.2. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL TRANSFORMATION<br />

HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fund<br />

ing<br />

Sour<br />

ce<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To facilitate<br />

skills<br />

developme<br />

nt initiatives<br />

and create<br />

conducive<br />

environmen<br />

t for<br />

learning<br />

To ensure<br />

sound<br />

knowledge<br />

base and<br />

accountabili<br />

ty<br />

By developing<br />

and submitting<br />

the Workplace<br />

Skills Plan to<br />

LGSeta<br />

By identifying<br />

skills<br />

programmes<br />

and including<br />

them in the<br />

Workplace<br />

Skills Plan<br />

By creating<br />

opportunities<br />

for experiential<br />

learning<br />

By assessing<br />

the impact of<br />

training<br />

interventions<br />

1. Bursarie<br />

s(ODT/0<br />

01/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

2. Experie<br />

ntial<br />

learning<br />

(ODT/00<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

3. Internsh<br />

ips(ODT/<br />

003/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

4. Learner<br />

ship(OD<br />

T/004/20<br />

13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

5. Recogni<br />

tion of<br />

Prior<br />

Learnin<br />

Backlogs<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

1. 0<br />

2. 0<br />

3. 43<br />

4. 55<br />

5. 0<br />

6. 100%<br />

7. 0<br />

8. 0<br />

Baseline<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

1. 76<br />

2. 44<br />

3. 43<br />

4. 46<br />

5. 178<br />

6. 0<br />

7. 0<br />

8. 0<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

1. number 1. 54<br />

of 2. 10<br />

bursaries 3. 30<br />

awarded 4. 100%<br />

2. number 5. 50<br />

of 6. 50<br />

experient 7. 50<br />

ial 8. 100%<br />

learners 9. 100%<br />

accomm 10. 100%<br />

odated<br />

3. Number<br />

of interns<br />

engaged<br />

4. Percenta<br />

ge of<br />

learnersh<br />

ip<br />

programs<br />

impleme<br />

nted<br />

1. number of<br />

bursaries<br />

awarded<br />

2. number of<br />

experienti<br />

al learners<br />

accommo<br />

dated<br />

3. Number of<br />

interns<br />

accommo<br />

dated<br />

4. Number of<br />

learnershi<br />

p identified<br />

and<br />

facilitated<br />

5. Number of<br />

employee<br />

RPL-ED<br />

6. Number of<br />

1. 54<br />

2. 10<br />

3. 30<br />

4. 100%<br />

5. 50<br />

6. 50<br />

7. 50<br />

8. 100%<br />

9. 100%<br />

10.100%<br />

1. number of<br />

bursaries<br />

awarded<br />

2. number of<br />

experiential<br />

learners<br />

accommodat<br />

ed<br />

3. Number of<br />

interns<br />

accommodat<br />

ed<br />

4. Number of<br />

learnership<br />

identified<br />

and<br />

facilitated<br />

5. Number of<br />

employee<br />

RPL-ED<br />

6. Number of<br />

1. 54<br />

2. 10<br />

3. 30<br />

4. 10<br />

0%<br />

5. 50<br />

6. 50<br />

7.50<br />

8.100<br />

%<br />

9.100<br />

%<br />

10.100<br />

%<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R4 000 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15<br />

R7,204,000<br />

2015/16:<br />

R7,589,996<br />

SDM<br />

and<br />

LGS<br />

ETA


280<br />

By rallying<br />

stakeholders<br />

to contribute<br />

towards skills<br />

development<br />

g(ODT/0<br />

05/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

6. Adult<br />

Eduatio<br />

n<br />

Training<br />

(ODT/00<br />

6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

7. Capacit<br />

y<br />

Building<br />

(skills<br />

program<br />

)<br />

(ODT/00<br />

7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

8. Skills<br />

Indaba(<br />

ODT/008<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

9. Workpla<br />

ce Skills<br />

Plan(OD<br />

T/009/20<br />

13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

10. Annual<br />

Training<br />

Report<br />

5. Number<br />

of<br />

employe<br />

ees<br />

subjects<br />

to RPL<br />

6. Number<br />

of<br />

emplyee<br />

s<br />

subjects<br />

to AET<br />

7. Number<br />

of<br />

employe<br />

ees<br />

undergoi<br />

ng skills<br />

program<br />

8.<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

achieve<br />

ment for<br />

undertaki<br />

ng skills<br />

indaba.<br />

9. Perentag<br />

e<br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

WSP.<br />

10. Per<br />

centage<br />

develop<br />

employee<br />

identified<br />

and<br />

registered<br />

number of<br />

employee s<br />

capacitated<br />

7. Implement,<br />

monitor<br />

and review<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Skills Plan.<br />

employee<br />

identified<br />

and<br />

registered<br />

number of<br />

employee s<br />

capacitated<br />

7. Implement,<br />

monitor and<br />

review<br />

<strong>District</strong> Skills<br />

Plan.


281<br />

ment of<br />

Annual<br />

Training<br />

Plan<br />

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY (OHS)<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective<br />

To<br />

promote<br />

employee<br />

health and<br />

wellness<br />

Strategie<br />

s<br />

By<br />

conductin<br />

g regular<br />

safety<br />

inspection<br />

s and<br />

remedyin<br />

g the<br />

hazard<br />

By<br />

conductin<br />

g safety<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

campaign<br />

s<br />

By<br />

Project<br />

1. OH<br />

S(O<br />

DT/0<br />

11/2<br />

013-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

2. Empl<br />

oyee<br />

Assist<br />

ance<br />

Progr<br />

am<br />

(EAP)<br />

frame<br />

work<br />

Backlog<br />

s<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

1. 0<br />

2. 0<br />

3. <strong>14</strong><br />

Baselin<br />

e<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

1. 288<br />

2. 66<br />

3. 28<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

1. Percentage<br />

review of OHS<br />

policy,<br />

Percentage<br />

establishment<br />

of safety<br />

committees<br />

2. Percentage<br />

development<br />

of eap<br />

framework<br />

3. Percentage<br />

establishment<br />

of EAP<br />

committees<br />

4. Number of<br />

EAP Training<br />

1. 10<br />

0%<br />

,<br />

10<br />

0%<br />

2. 10<br />

0%<br />

3. 10<br />

0%<br />

4. 2<br />

5. 4<br />

6. 4<br />

an<br />

d 5<br />

1. number of<br />

safety<br />

inspections<br />

and<br />

corrective<br />

measures<br />

2. Number of<br />

safety<br />

awareness<br />

campaigns<br />

3. Number of<br />

awarenessc<br />

ampaigns<br />

conducted<br />

4. Number<br />

of injuries<br />

attended.<br />

1. 08<br />

2. 08<br />

3. 08<br />

4. 5<br />

1. Number of<br />

safety<br />

inspections<br />

and<br />

corrective<br />

measures<br />

2. Number of<br />

safety<br />

awareness<br />

campaigns<br />

3. Number of<br />

wellness<br />

campaigns<br />

conducted<br />

4. Number of<br />

injuries<br />

attended.<br />

1. 08<br />

2. 08<br />

3. 08<br />

4. 4<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> -<br />

R 1 370 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 -<br />

R 1 440 000<br />

2015/2016 –<br />

R 1 510 000<br />

SDM


282<br />

conductin<br />

g regular<br />

wellness<br />

campaign<br />

s<br />

By<br />

managing<br />

injuries in<br />

the<br />

workplace<br />

(ODT<br />

/013/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

3. EAP<br />

comiit<br />

ees<br />

(ODT<br />

/0<strong>14</strong>/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

4. EAP<br />

traini<br />

ng<br />

(ODT<br />

/015/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

5. EAP<br />

quart<br />

erly<br />

report<br />

s<br />

(ODT/016<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

6.Compe<br />

nsation<br />

Occupati<br />

onal<br />

Injuries<br />

and<br />

initiatives<br />

provided<br />

5. Number of<br />

quarterly<br />

reports<br />

6. Number of<br />

awareness<br />

campaigns<br />

conducted<br />

and number of<br />

drills<br />

undertaken


283<br />

Diseases<br />

Act<br />

(COIDA)<br />

((ODT/01<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

6.<br />

LABOUR RELATIONS<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To By<br />

promote maintaining a<br />

sound functional<br />

labour Labour<br />

relations. Relations<br />

Forum<br />

By<br />

conducting<br />

awareness<br />

on labour<br />

relations<br />

1. Local<br />

Labour<br />

Forum<br />

(ODT/017/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

2. Labour<br />

Relations<br />

Bulletins<br />

/publications<br />

(ODT/019/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Backlogs<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

1. 0<br />

2. 0<br />

Baseline<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

1. 31<br />

2. 10<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Targe<br />

t<br />

1. Number 1. 12<br />

1.12<br />

1.12<br />

of Local 2. 4<br />

2. 06<br />

2.06<br />

Labour<br />

Forums’<br />

meetings<br />

2. Number<br />

of<br />

Labour<br />

Relation<br />

s<br />

Bulletins<br />

1. Number<br />

of Local<br />

Labour<br />

Forums’<br />

meeting<br />

s<br />

2. Number<br />

of<br />

Labour<br />

Relation<br />

s<br />

Bulletins<br />

1. Number of<br />

Local<br />

Labour<br />

Forums’<br />

meetings<br />

2. Number of<br />

Labour<br />

Relations<br />

Bulletins<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R50 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R52 550<br />

2015/16 –<br />

R55 125<br />

SDM


284<br />

IGR <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R20,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R21,020<br />

2015/16 –<br />

R22,049.9<br />

8<br />

HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT<br />

Object<br />

ive<br />

Strategies<br />

Project<br />

Backlogs<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

Baseline<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

Source<br />

To<br />

provid<br />

e<br />

sound<br />

and<br />

sustain<br />

able<br />

human<br />

resour<br />

ces<br />

By<br />

implementing<br />

HR Plan<br />

By<br />

implementing<br />

employment<br />

equity targets<br />

By reviewing<br />

and<br />

implementing<br />

human<br />

resources<br />

1. HR plan<br />

HR policies<br />

and<br />

procedures<br />

(ODT/021/20<br />

13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

2.Successio<br />

n Plan<br />

(Career<br />

pathing)<br />

(ODT/022/20<br />

13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

1.50%<br />

2.1<br />

3.100%<br />

4.<br />

Accumulativ<br />

e lack of<br />

review<br />

5 .No<br />

backlog<br />

1. 50%<br />

2.30<br />

3.0%<br />

4.<br />

Retentio<br />

n<br />

Strategy<br />

in place.<br />

5. EEP<br />

in place.<br />

1. % HR<br />

plan<br />

develope<br />

d,<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

policies/p<br />

rocedure<br />

s<br />

reviewed/<br />

develope<br />

d<br />

1.100<br />

%, 31<br />

policie<br />

s<br />

review<br />

er/dev<br />

eloped<br />

2.31<br />

3.100<br />

%<br />

4.100<br />

% EE<br />

1.% plan<br />

implemented<br />

2.Number of<br />

policies and<br />

procedures<br />

3.% plan<br />

implemented<br />

4.%<br />

retention<br />

strategy<br />

implemented<br />

5.%<br />

1. 100%<br />

2. 31<br />

3. 100%<br />

4. 100%<br />

5. 100%<br />

1.% plan<br />

implemented<br />

2.Number of<br />

policies and<br />

procedures<br />

3.% plan<br />

developed<br />

4.% retention<br />

strategy<br />

reviewed<br />

5. %<br />

employment<br />

1.100%<br />

2.31<br />

3.100%<br />

4.100%<br />

5.100%<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

R130,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15<br />

R136,000<br />

2015/16<br />

<strong>14</strong>3,324<br />

N/A


285<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

systems<br />

By developing<br />

and<br />

implementing<br />

careerpathing<br />

plans<br />

By reviewing<br />

and<br />

implementing<br />

Retention<br />

strategy<br />

3.Retention<br />

strategy(OD<br />

T/0<strong>23</strong>/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

4.Employme<br />

nt equity<br />

plan (EEP)(<br />

ODT/024/20<br />

13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

5.Recruitme<br />

nt and<br />

selection<br />

(ODT/024/20<br />

13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Relocation<br />

expenses<br />

(ODT/026/20<br />

13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Coordinate<br />

induction<br />

program<br />

2. %<br />

successio<br />

n plan<br />

develope<br />

d<br />

3. Percenta<br />

ge<br />

retention<br />

strategy<br />

reviewed<br />

4. Percenta<br />

ge<br />

employm<br />

ent equity<br />

targets<br />

achieved<br />

5. Percenta<br />

ge<br />

vacancy<br />

rate of<br />

funded<br />

posts<br />

kept<br />

Percentage<br />

payment<br />

facilitated<br />

targets<br />

achiev<br />

ed<br />

5.5%<br />

employment<br />

equity<br />

targets<br />

achieved<br />

equity targets<br />

achieved<br />

100% R250 000


286<br />

INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY<br />

Objectiv<br />

e<br />

To<br />

provide<br />

conduciv<br />

e<br />

environe<br />

nt for ICT<br />

Strategies<br />

By<br />

conducting<br />

needs<br />

analysis<br />

Baseline<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

Project<br />

0% User<br />

requirement<br />

s<br />

analysis(OD<br />

T/027/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Backlog<br />

s<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Indicator<br />

100% % user<br />

requiremen<br />

t analysis<br />

completed<br />

Targe<br />

t<br />

100<br />

%<br />

(dat<br />

a<br />

gath<br />

erin<br />

g<br />

50%<br />

,<br />

draft<br />

repo<br />

rt<br />

25%<br />

,<br />

appr<br />

oval<br />

25%<br />

)<br />

Indicator Target Indicat<br />

or<br />

Target<br />

% user 100% % user<br />

requirement<br />

requirement<br />

analysis report<br />

analysis<br />

completed.<br />

report<br />

completed.<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fund<br />

ing<br />

Sour<br />

ce<br />

100% SDM<br />

By<br />

establishing<br />

sound<br />

regulatory<br />

environment<br />

2 Policy analysis<br />

(ODT/028/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

6 Number of<br />

Policies and<br />

Procedures<br />

reviewed/de<br />

veloped<br />

6 Number of<br />

Policies and<br />

Procedures<br />

reviewed<br />

6 Number of<br />

Policies<br />

and<br />

Procedure<br />

s reviewed<br />

6


287<br />

By ensuring<br />

a stable IT<br />

environment<br />

User support<br />

ICT systems<br />

support<br />

(ODT/029/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

0% % support<br />

provided to<br />

end-users<br />

100<br />

%<br />

% support<br />

provided to<br />

end-users<br />

100% % support<br />

provided to<br />

end-users<br />

100<br />

%<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R2m<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R2,102,000<br />

2015/2016 –<br />

R2,204,998<br />

By ensuring<br />

reliable<br />

wireless<br />

network<br />

100% ICT upgrades<br />

(wireless<br />

network)<br />

(ODT/030/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

0% % wireless<br />

network<br />

available<br />

100<br />

%<br />

% wireless<br />

network<br />

available<br />

100% % wireless<br />

network<br />

available<br />

100<br />

%<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R1,M<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R1,051,000<br />

2015/16 –<br />

R1,102,499<br />

By<br />

maintaining<br />

ICT<br />

infrastructur<br />

e<br />

100% ICT<br />

Maintenance<br />

(ODT/031/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

0% % ICT<br />

infrastructure<br />

maintained<br />

100<br />

%<br />

% ICT<br />

infrastructure<br />

maintained<br />

100% % ICT<br />

infrastructur<br />

e<br />

maintained<br />

100<br />

%<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R700,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R735,700<br />

2015/16 –<br />

R771,749.30


288<br />

By<br />

maintaining<br />

ICT<br />

infrastructur<br />

e<br />

100% Computer<br />

consumables &<br />

accessories<br />

(ODT/032/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

0% % acquisition<br />

of<br />

consumables<br />

and<br />

accessories<br />

requested<br />

100<br />

%<br />

% acquisition<br />

of<br />

consumables<br />

and<br />

accessories<br />

requested<br />

100% %<br />

acquisition<br />

of<br />

consumable<br />

s and<br />

accessories<br />

requested<br />

100<br />

%<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R200,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R210,200<br />

2015/16 –<br />

R220,499.80<br />

By<br />

extending<br />

ICT<br />

Infrastructur<br />

e <strong>District</strong><br />

wide<br />

By<br />

complying<br />

with the<br />

intellectual<br />

property<br />

rights<br />

legislations<br />

All offices<br />

except certain<br />

depots and<br />

regions<br />

connected to<br />

the network<br />

Licences with<br />

ICT service<br />

providers paid<br />

Communication<br />

(landlines,<br />

internet, email<br />

infrastructure<br />

expansion)<br />

(ODT/033/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Software and<br />

ICT Licenses<br />

(ODT/034/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

16 Number of<br />

sites<br />

included in<br />

the network<br />

None<br />

Percentage<br />

software<br />

licenses paid<br />

18 Number of<br />

sites included<br />

in the network<br />

100<br />

%<br />

Percentage<br />

software<br />

licenses paid<br />

18 Number of<br />

sites<br />

included in<br />

the network<br />

100% Percentage<br />

software<br />

licenses<br />

paid<br />

18 <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R4,819,693.9<br />

6<br />

100<br />

%<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R5,065,498.3<br />

5<br />

2015/16 –<br />

R5,313,707.7<br />

7<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R2,3M<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R2,417,300<br />

2015/2016 –<br />

R2,535,747.7<br />

0


289<br />

By<br />

maintaining<br />

ICT<br />

infrastructur<br />

e<br />

100% Computer<br />

equipment &<br />

accessories<br />

(ODT/035/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

0% % acquisition<br />

of equipment<br />

and<br />

accessories<br />

acquired as<br />

and when<br />

requested<br />

100<br />

%<br />

% acquisition<br />

of equipment<br />

and<br />

accessories<br />

acquired as<br />

and when<br />

requested<br />

100% %<br />

acquisition<br />

of<br />

equipment<br />

and<br />

accessories<br />

requested<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R500,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R525,500<br />

2015/16 –<br />

R551,249.5<br />

By<br />

improving<br />

ICT security<br />

5 Security<br />

upgrade server<br />

room<br />

(ODT/036/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

5 Number of<br />

server<br />

rooms<br />

upgraded.<br />

5 Number of<br />

server rooms<br />

upgraded.<br />

5 Number<br />

of server<br />

rooms<br />

upgraded<br />

.<br />

5 <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R200,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R0<br />

2015/16 –R0<br />

By<br />

improving<br />

the quality<br />

of ICT<br />

services<br />

100% Professional<br />

fees<br />

(ODT/037/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

0% %<br />

professional<br />

fees<br />

expended<br />

100% % professional<br />

advice<br />

received<br />

100% %<br />

professional<br />

advice<br />

received<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R900,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R1,996,900<br />

2015/16 –<br />

R2,094,748


290<br />

ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To improve By improving<br />

institutional and<br />

developme implementing<br />

nt and business<br />

productivity processes<br />

By evaluating<br />

the<br />

organisationa<br />

l structure<br />

By<br />

conducting<br />

culture<br />

surveys<br />

By<br />

conducting<br />

job<br />

evaluations<br />

By<br />

implementing<br />

performance<br />

management<br />

framework<br />

1. Procedure<br />

manuals<br />

(ODT/038/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

2. Form<br />

design<br />

(ODT/039/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

3. Organisati<br />

onal<br />

structure<br />

(ODT/040/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

4. Culture<br />

survey.<br />

(ODT/041/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

5. Job<br />

evaluation<br />

(ODT/042/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

6.Performance<br />

management(<br />

ODT/043/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Backlogs<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

1. 20<br />

2. 30<br />

3. 0%<br />

4. 100%<br />

5. 100%<br />

6. 100% for<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />

Baseline<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

1. 80<br />

2. 0<br />

3. 100%<br />

4. 0%<br />

5. 0%<br />

6. 0%<br />

Performance<br />

commitments<br />

signed in<br />

2009/2010<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

1. Number 1. 20 1. % 1. 50 1. % 1. 50%<br />

of 2. 10 manuals % Manuals 2. 10<br />

procedur 3. 100 reviewed. 2. 10 reviewed 3. 100%<br />

e<br />

% 2. Number 3. 100 2. Number 4. 100%<br />

Manuals 4. 100 of forms % of forms 5. 100%<br />

reviewd. % develope 4. 100 develope 6. 100%<br />

2. Number 5. 100 d.<br />

% d<br />

of forms % 3. % 5. 100 3. %<br />

develope 6. 100 structure % structure<br />

d.<br />

% reviewed. 6. 100 reviewer<br />

3. % Org<br />

4. % % 4. % survey<br />

Structure<br />

Survey<br />

conducte<br />

reviewed.<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

4. %<br />

d.<br />

5. 5. % of<br />

culture<br />

5. % of<br />

jobs<br />

Survey<br />

jobs<br />

evaluated<br />

conducte<br />

evaluated<br />

6. percentag<br />

d.<br />

.<br />

eperforma<br />

5. percent<br />

6. percent<br />

nce<br />

age job<br />

age<br />

commitm<br />

evaluatio<br />

performa<br />

ents and<br />

n<br />

nce<br />

agreemen<br />

conducte<br />

commitm<br />

ts signed.<br />

d.<br />

ents<br />

6. Percent<br />

conclude<br />

age<br />

d<br />

performa<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R500 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R525 500<br />

2015/16 –<br />

R551 250<br />

Fund<br />

ing<br />

Sour<br />

ce<br />

SDM


291<br />

nce<br />

commitm<br />

ents<br />

conclude<br />

d<br />

LEGAL SERVICES<br />

Backlog<br />

s<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Baselin<br />

e<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

Source<br />

Objecti<br />

ve<br />

To<br />

provide<br />

effective<br />

and<br />

efficient<br />

legal<br />

services<br />

.<br />

Strategies<br />

By<br />

appointing<br />

a panel of<br />

attorneys.<br />

By<br />

providing<br />

legal<br />

support to<br />

department<br />

s.<br />

By<br />

providing<br />

legislative<br />

updates.<br />

Project<br />

1.Legal<br />

matters<br />

(ODT/044/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

2.Legislati<br />

ve<br />

review<br />

updates<br />

(ODT/045<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

1. 0%<br />

2. 0<br />

1.100%<br />

2.4<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

1. Percen<br />

tage of<br />

court<br />

matters<br />

attende<br />

d.<br />

2. Numbe<br />

r of<br />

legislati<br />

ve<br />

review<br />

update<br />

s<br />

conduc<br />

ted<br />

1. 100<br />

%<br />

2. 4<br />

1.<br />

Percentag<br />

e of court<br />

matters<br />

attended.<br />

2. Number<br />

of<br />

legislative<br />

review<br />

updates.<br />

1. 100%<br />

2. 4<br />

1. perentage of<br />

court matters<br />

attended.<br />

2. Number of<br />

legislative<br />

review<br />

updates.<br />

1. 100%<br />

2. 4<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> –<br />

R2 000 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15 –<br />

R2 102 000<br />

2015/16 –<br />

R2 204 998<br />

SDM


292<br />

AUXILLIARY SERVICES<br />

Backlogs<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

Baseline<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To provide By<br />

sound reviewing<br />

records the file<br />

manageme plan.<br />

nt systems<br />

By<br />

implementi<br />

ng the<br />

Electronic<br />

Document<br />

Manageme<br />

nt System.<br />

By<br />

disposing<br />

of records.<br />

By<br />

archiving<br />

records of<br />

value.<br />

1. File<br />

plan.<br />

(ODT/049/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

2. Electro<br />

nic<br />

docume<br />

nt<br />

manage<br />

ment<br />

3. Record<br />

s<br />

disposa<br />

l<br />

(ODT/047/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

4. Arc<br />

hive<br />

s<br />

1. None<br />

2. 100<br />

%<br />

3. 100<br />

%<br />

4. 420<br />

files<br />

5. 90%<br />

1. File<br />

plan in<br />

place<br />

2. 0%<br />

3. No<br />

dispos<br />

al<br />

conduc<br />

ted.<br />

4. 920Fil<br />

es<br />

5. 10%<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

1. % file<br />

plan<br />

reviewe<br />

d.<br />

2. %<br />

Electro<br />

nic<br />

docum<br />

ents<br />

capture<br />

d.<br />

3. % of<br />

records<br />

dispose<br />

d.<br />

4. % of<br />

files<br />

archive<br />

d.<br />

1. 100%<br />

2. 100%<br />

3. 100%<br />

4. 100%<br />

5. 100%<br />

1.% file plan<br />

reviewed<br />

2.%<br />

Electronic<br />

documents<br />

captured<br />

3.% of<br />

records<br />

disposed<br />

4.% of<br />

records<br />

archived<br />

5.% of<br />

personnel<br />

files audited<br />

and<br />

updated<br />

1. 100<br />

%<br />

2. 100<br />

%<br />

3. 100<br />

%<br />

4. 100<br />

%<br />

5. 100<br />

%<br />

1. % file<br />

plan<br />

reviewed.<br />

2. %<br />

Electronic<br />

document<br />

s<br />

captured.<br />

3. % of<br />

records<br />

disposed.<br />

4. % of<br />

records<br />

archived.<br />

5. % of<br />

personnel<br />

files<br />

audited<br />

and<br />

1. 100%<br />

2. 100%<br />

3. 100%<br />

4. 100%<br />

5. 100%<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

– R41 960<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

– R44 010<br />

2015/2016<br />

– R46 261<br />

SDM


293<br />

To provide<br />

an effective<br />

fleet<br />

manageme<br />

nt system<br />

By auditing<br />

personnel<br />

files.<br />

By<br />

ensuring<br />

proper<br />

lease<br />

contract<br />

manageme<br />

nt<br />

(OD<br />

T/04<br />

8/20<br />

13-<br />

201<br />

4)<br />

5. Person<br />

nel file<br />

audit.<br />

(ODT/0<br />

49/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Fleet<br />

Managemen<br />

t (contract<br />

managemen<br />

t)<br />

(ODT/050/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Fleet<br />

Manageme<br />

nt (lease)<br />

5. % of<br />

person<br />

nel files<br />

audited<br />

0% % lease<br />

contract<br />

managem<br />

ent done<br />

100% % lease<br />

contract<br />

manageme<br />

nt done<br />

updated.<br />

100% % lease<br />

contract<br />

manageme<br />

nt done<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

–R7,442<br />

292.80<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

–R7,821<br />

849.73<br />

2015/2016<br />

–R8,<br />

205,120.37<br />

Fleet<br />

manageme<br />

nt (own<br />

vehicles)<br />

% fleet<br />

register<br />

compiled<br />

and<br />

maintaine<br />

d<br />

100% % fleet<br />

register<br />

compiled<br />

and<br />

maintained<br />

100% % fleet<br />

register<br />

compiled<br />

and<br />

maintained<br />

100%


294<br />

By<br />

managing<br />

trips on<br />

municipal<br />

vehicles<br />

Fuel fleet<br />

(ODT/051/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Fuel fleet 0% %<br />

payment<br />

of fuel<br />

made<br />

Weak fuel<br />

expenses<br />

reconciliati<br />

on (2/12)<br />

Number of<br />

accurate<br />

and<br />

complete<br />

fuel<br />

expenditur<br />

e<br />

reconciliati<br />

ons done<br />

100% % payment<br />

of fuel<br />

made<br />

12 Number of<br />

accurate<br />

and<br />

complete<br />

fuel<br />

expenditure<br />

reconciliatio<br />

ns done<br />

100% % payment<br />

of fuel<br />

made<br />

12 Number of<br />

accurate<br />

and<br />

complete<br />

fuel<br />

expenditure<br />

reconciliatio<br />

ns done<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

–<br />

R3,165,000<br />

12<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

–<br />

R3,326,415<br />

.00<br />

2015/2016<br />

–<br />

R3,489,409<br />

.34<br />

No follow<br />

up on<br />

exceptions<br />

raised<br />

%<br />

exceptions<br />

followed<br />

up<br />

100% %<br />

exceptions<br />

followed up<br />

100% %<br />

exceptions<br />

followed up<br />

100%<br />

By<br />

ensuring<br />

that<br />

vehicles<br />

are in good<br />

running<br />

condition<br />

Repairs and<br />

maintenanc<br />

e (own<br />

vehicles)<br />

(ODT/052/2<br />

Repairs<br />

and<br />

maintenan<br />

ce (own<br />

vehicles)<br />

0% % vehicles<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintaine<br />

d<br />

100% % vehicles<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintained<br />

100% % vehicles<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintained<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

–R2,<br />

750,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

–<br />

R2,890,250<br />

2015/2016


295<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

(No register<br />

of vehicle<br />

service<br />

maintenanc<br />

e)<br />

% of<br />

register of<br />

vehicle<br />

service<br />

maintenan<br />

ce created<br />

100% % of<br />

register of<br />

vehicle<br />

service<br />

maintenanc<br />

e created<br />

100% % of<br />

register of<br />

vehicle<br />

service<br />

maintenanc<br />

e created<br />

100% –<br />

R3,031,872<br />

.25<br />

By<br />

ensuring<br />

that<br />

municipal<br />

vehicles<br />

are<br />

properly<br />

licensed<br />

Licenses<br />

and<br />

subscription<br />

s (vehicles<br />

and satellite<br />

dishes)<br />

(ODT/053/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Licenses<br />

and<br />

subscriptio<br />

ns<br />

(vehicles<br />

and<br />

satellite<br />

dishes)<br />

0% % licences<br />

and<br />

subscriptio<br />

ns paid<br />

100% % licences<br />

and<br />

subscription<br />

s paid<br />

100% % licences<br />

and<br />

subscription<br />

s paid<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

–<br />

R95,348.30<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

–<br />

R100,211.0<br />

7<br />

2015/2016<br />

–<br />

R105,121.4<br />

1<br />

By<br />

ensuring<br />

the safety<br />

of<br />

municipal<br />

vehicles<br />

Tracking<br />

devices<br />

(vehicles)<br />

(ODT/054/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Tracking<br />

devices<br />

(vehicles)<br />

0% % tracking<br />

devices<br />

installed<br />

and<br />

functional<br />

100% % tracking<br />

devices<br />

installed<br />

and<br />

functional<br />

100% % tracking<br />

devices<br />

installed<br />

and<br />

functional<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

–<br />

R156,341.7<br />

9<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

–<br />

R164,3<strong>14</strong>.1<br />

7<br />

2015/2016<br />

–<br />

R172,365.5<br />

6


296<br />

To provide<br />

effective<br />

facilities<br />

manageme<br />

nt system<br />

By<br />

ensuring<br />

that<br />

municipal<br />

properties<br />

are<br />

properly<br />

maintained<br />

Repairs &<br />

Maintenanc<br />

e (Buildings<br />

and<br />

equipments)<br />

(ODT/056/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Repairs &<br />

Maintenan<br />

ce<br />

Buildings &<br />

equipment<br />

s<br />

0% %<br />

buildings<br />

&equipme<br />

nts<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintaine<br />

d<br />

100% % buildings<br />

&equipment<br />

s repaired<br />

and<br />

maintained<br />

100% % buildings<br />

&equipment<br />

s repaired<br />

and<br />

maintained<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

–R300,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

–R315,300<br />

2015/2016<br />

–<br />

R330,749.7<br />

0<br />

By paying<br />

lease and<br />

rental on<br />

time<br />

Lease/rental<br />

(offices)<br />

(ODT/057/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Lease/rent<br />

al (offices)<br />

0 percentag<br />

e lease<br />

and rental<br />

paid<br />

% of<br />

contract<br />

register of<br />

completed<br />

100% percentage<br />

lease and<br />

rental paid<br />

100% % of<br />

contract<br />

register of<br />

completed<br />

100% percentage<br />

lease and<br />

rental paid<br />

100% % of<br />

contract<br />

register of<br />

completed<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

–R4,6M<br />

100%<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

–<br />

R4,834,600<br />

2015/2016<br />

–<br />

R5,071,495<br />

.40<br />

By paying<br />

lease and<br />

rental on<br />

time<br />

Lease/rental<br />

office<br />

machines<br />

(ODT/058/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Lease/rent<br />

al office<br />

machines<br />

0 Percentag<br />

e leases<br />

and rental<br />

paid<br />

100% Percentage<br />

leases and<br />

rental paid<br />

100% Percentage<br />

leases and<br />

rental paid<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

–R3,M<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

–<br />

R3,153,000<br />

2015/2016<br />

–<br />

R3,307,497<br />

Licences &<br />

subscription<br />

Licences &<br />

subscriptio<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

–R95 348


297<br />

s<br />

ns<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

–R52 550<br />

2015/2016<br />

–R55 125<br />

By<br />

ensuring a<br />

habitable<br />

environme<br />

nt<br />

Garden and<br />

cleaning<br />

services<br />

(ODT/059/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Garden<br />

and<br />

cleaning<br />

services<br />

0% Percentag<br />

e<br />

gardening<br />

and<br />

cleaning<br />

services<br />

paid<br />

100% Percentage<br />

gardening<br />

and<br />

cleaning<br />

services<br />

paid<br />

100% Percentage<br />

gardening<br />

and<br />

cleaning<br />

services<br />

paid<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

–R2,4m<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

–<br />

R2,552,400<br />

2015/2016<br />

–<br />

R2,645,997<br />

.06<br />

By<br />

providing<br />

temporary<br />

accommod<br />

ation for<br />

new<br />

appointees<br />

Relocation<br />

expenses<br />

Relocation<br />

expenses<br />

0% %<br />

accommo<br />

dation<br />

provided<br />

to new<br />

appointee<br />

s<br />

100% %<br />

accommoda<br />

tion<br />

provided to<br />

new<br />

appointees<br />

100% %<br />

accommoda<br />

tion<br />

provided to<br />

new<br />

appointees<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

–R250,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

–R262,750<br />

2015/2016<br />

–<br />

R275,624.7<br />

5<br />

To provide<br />

sound<br />

working<br />

environmen<br />

t<br />

By<br />

providing<br />

the<br />

necessary<br />

equipment<br />

s<br />

Office<br />

equipment<br />

(ODT/060/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Office<br />

equipment<br />

Percentag<br />

e office<br />

equipment<br />

s repaired<br />

and<br />

maintaine<br />

d<br />

100% Percentage<br />

office<br />

equipments<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintained<br />

100% Percentage<br />

office<br />

equipments<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintained<br />

100% R220 000<br />

Furniture Furniture Percentag 100% Percentage 100% Percentage 100% R220 000


298<br />

equipment<br />

(ODT/061/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

equipment<br />

e furniture<br />

equipment<br />

s repaired<br />

and<br />

maintaine<br />

d<br />

furniture<br />

equipments<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintained<br />

furniture<br />

equipments<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintained<br />

Contract management<br />

Backlog<br />

s<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Baselin<br />

e<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

Source<br />

Objecti<br />

ve<br />

Strategies<br />

Project<br />

Contract<br />

manage<br />

met<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

monitor<br />

ing of<br />

contrac<br />

ts<br />

100% Percenta<br />

ge<br />

monit<br />

oring<br />

of<br />

contra<br />

cts<br />

100% Percentage<br />

monitoring<br />

of contracts<br />

100%


299<br />

5.3. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT<br />

WATER AND SANITATION<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

To<br />

prov<br />

ide<br />

wat<br />

er to<br />

hou<br />

seh<br />

olds<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Deve<br />

lop,<br />

Impl<br />

eme<br />

nt &<br />

Com<br />

pleti<br />

on of<br />

50%<br />

of<br />

bulk<br />

wate<br />

r<br />

proje<br />

cts.<br />

Project<br />

Mahlakwe<br />

na Village<br />

(Steelpoort<br />

) BWS<br />

(BSD/001/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Mooihoek<br />

Internal<br />

Bulk<br />

(BSD/005/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

husehol<br />

ds<br />

served<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

121 Number of<br />

huseholds served<br />

20% Percentage<br />

completion<br />

121 Number of<br />

huseholds served<br />

20% Percentage<br />

completion<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

121 Yr 1 =<br />

3 100<br />

000<br />

20% Yr 1 =<br />

1<br />

500 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

20<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

20<br />

000<br />

000<br />

Reservoir Percent 5% Percentage 5% Percentage 5% Yr 1 = MI<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

A<br />

CI<br />

P<br />

MI<br />

G


300<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

SB<br />

(Mooihoek)<br />

(BSD/038/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Pipeline<br />

from<br />

Mooihoek<br />

WTW to<br />

Reservoir<br />

SB<br />

(BSD/039/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Bulk<br />

Pipeline to<br />

SB take off<br />

(BSD/040/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Doubling<br />

of<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

Year 1<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

completion completion 240 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

3<br />

760 0<br />

5% design<br />

completed= 20%,<br />

construction<br />

Complete= 80%<br />

5% design= 20%,<br />

construction= 80%<br />

20%-detailed design<br />

approved=20%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

5% design<br />

completed= 20%<br />

construction<br />

Complete= 80%<br />

5% design= 20%<br />

construction= 80%<br />

20%-detailed<br />

design<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

5% design<br />

completed= 20%<br />

construction<br />

Complete= 80%<br />

5% design= 20%<br />

construction= 80%<br />

20%-detailed<br />

design<br />

00<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

990 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

8<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

13<br />

010<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

500 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

7<br />

500 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

1<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


301<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Mooihoek<br />

WTW<br />

(BSD/007/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Mooihoek<br />

(Manoke &<br />

Dresden<br />

Pipeline)<br />

Bulk<br />

Pipeline to<br />

Lebalelo<br />

Central<br />

(BSD/006/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

%<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Perenta<br />

ge<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Year 1<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

approved=20% approved=20% 050 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

10<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

<strong>23</strong><br />

950<br />

000<br />

10% Complete % completion 50% Complete % completion 100% Complete Yr 1 =<br />

40 00<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

40<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

100<br />

000<br />

000<br />

20%-detailed design<br />

approved=20%<br />

Perentage<br />

completion<br />

20%-detailed<br />

design<br />

approved=20%<br />

Perentage<br />

completion<br />

20%-detailed<br />

design<br />

approved=20%<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

1 080<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

15<br />

000 0<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

R<br />

BI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


302<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

20<strong>14</strong>) 00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

19<br />

920<br />

000<br />

Reservoirs<br />

in Lebalelo<br />

Central<br />

(BSD/008/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Connector<br />

Pipes to<br />

Lebalelo<br />

North<br />

(BSD/009/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

20%-detailed design<br />

approved=20%<br />

20%-detailed design<br />

approved=20%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

20%-detailed<br />

design<br />

approved=20%<br />

20%-detailed<br />

design<br />

approved=20%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

20%-detailed<br />

design<br />

approved=20%<br />

20%-detailed<br />

design<br />

approved=20%<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

900 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

10<br />

810 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

18<br />

290<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

660 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

9<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

12<br />

340<br />

000<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


303<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Olifantspo<br />

ort South<br />

Regional<br />

WS<br />

Scheme<br />

phase 6<br />

(BSD/010/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Nkadimen<br />

g BWS<br />

(BSD/011/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Carbonitite<br />

s to<br />

Zaaiplaas<br />

(BSD/012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Jane Furse<br />

25ml<br />

command<br />

Reservoir(<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househ<br />

olds<br />

served<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

5000 Number of<br />

households<br />

served<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

5000 Number of<br />

households<br />

served<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

Yr 1<br />

= 10<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

30<br />

000<br />

000<br />

5000 Yr 1 =<br />

24<br />

000<br />

000<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Yr 1<br />

= 15<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

27<br />

588 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

3 200<br />

000<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


304<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

ph1C)<br />

(BSD/013/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Connector<br />

Pipes to<br />

Zaaiplaas<br />

Villages<br />

(BSD/0<strong>14</strong>/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Nebo<br />

Plateau<br />

Bulk Water<br />

Supply-<br />

Jane<br />

Furse-<br />

Marulanen<br />

g<br />

(BSD/051/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

5<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

24<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

1 000<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

20<br />

285 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

26<br />

835 0<br />

00<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

R<br />

BI<br />

G


305<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Nebo<br />

Plateau<br />

Bulk Water<br />

Supply-<br />

Jane Furse<br />

to<br />

Lobethal(B<br />

SD/052/20<br />

13-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Ga-<br />

Malekana<br />

to Jane<br />

Furse<br />

pipeline<br />

(BSD/053/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Ga-<br />

Malekana<br />

WTW 36ml<br />

(BSD/054/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

20% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

24<br />

715 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

22<br />

210 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

40<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

80<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

180 0<br />

00<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

8<br />

911 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

79<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

R<br />

BI<br />

G<br />

R<br />

BI<br />

G<br />

R<br />

BI<br />

G


306<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

20<strong>14</strong>) 710 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

111<br />

379<br />

000<br />

Groblersda<br />

l/Luckau<br />

Water<br />

Supply(BS<br />

D/015/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Upgrading<br />

of Piet<br />

Gouws<br />

WTW<br />

(BSD/016/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Piet<br />

Gouws<br />

Bulk<br />

supply and<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

12 79<br />

4 561<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

4 500<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

10 09<br />

1 700<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

158 3<br />

00<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

750<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


307<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

storage<br />

(BSD/017/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Ga-<br />

Maphopha<br />

Command<br />

Reservoir<br />

(BSD/018/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Steelpoort<br />

Valley<br />

Connector<br />

Pipeline<br />

(BSD/019/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Mphanama<br />

village<br />

connectors<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

5% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

7 500<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

4<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

10<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

20<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

4<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

<strong>14</strong> 20<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

1<br />

000 0<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


308<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Gabaneng,<br />

Ga-Mmela<br />

(BSD/020/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Moutse<br />

BWS<br />

Phase<br />

(Counter<br />

funding)<br />

(BSD/021/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Moutse<br />

BWS<br />

(Project 7<br />

to 12 & 15)<br />

(BSD/055/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Moutse<br />

Bulk Water<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

ion complete=80% complete=80% complete=80% 00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

5<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

4<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

eion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

N/A<br />

40% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

Percentage<br />

completeion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

N/A<br />

40% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

Percentage<br />

completeion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

N/A Yr 2 =<br />

30<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

30<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

40% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

98 00<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

165<br />

500<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

18<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

R<br />

BI<br />

G<br />

R<br />

BI


309<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Supply<br />

(Project 1<br />

and 2)<br />

(BSD/056/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Moutse<br />

BWS<br />

Phase<br />

3,4,5<br />

(BSD/057/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Moutse<br />

BWS<br />

Project<br />

13&<strong>14</strong><br />

(BSD/058/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Ga<br />

Nkwana<br />

Housing<br />

BWS<br />

(BSD/022/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Perceta<br />

ge<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

50% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

50% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Percetage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

50% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

50% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Percetage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

50% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

50% designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%<br />

100%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

200 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

31<br />

455<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

70<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

71 00<br />

0 000<br />

Y1 =<br />

31 20<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

6 200<br />

000<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

G<br />

R<br />

BI<br />

G<br />

R<br />

BI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


310<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Replacem<br />

ent of<br />

dedicated<br />

line to<br />

Jane Furse<br />

Hospital<br />

(BSD/067/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Refurbish<br />

ment and<br />

Upgrading<br />

of<br />

Hlogotlou<br />

WTW<br />

(BSD/068/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Magnet<br />

Heights to<br />

Schoonoor<br />

d bulk<br />

pipeline &<br />

Schoonoor<br />

d 5ml<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

100%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

100% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

30% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

100%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

100% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

30% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

100%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

100% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

30% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

Yr =<br />

1 500<br />

000<br />

Y r 2 =<br />

500<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

1 500<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

30<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

27<br />

084 0<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

W<br />

S<br />

O<br />

G<br />

W<br />

S<br />

O<br />

G<br />

R<br />

BI<br />

G


311<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Impl<br />

eme<br />

ntati<br />

on of<br />

wate<br />

r<br />

retic<br />

ulati<br />

on<br />

(65%<br />

of<br />

backl<br />

og)<br />

Project<br />

comand<br />

Reservoir<br />

(BSD/059/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Sekwati<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

project<br />

phase 2 &<br />

3<br />

(BSD/0<strong>23</strong>/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Tafelkop<br />

reticulation<br />

(BSD/047/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househ<br />

olds<br />

served<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

2 980 Number of<br />

households<br />

served<br />

30% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

2 980 Number of<br />

households<br />

served<br />

30% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

34<br />

516 0<br />

00<br />

2 980 Yr 1 =<br />

756<br />

000<br />

30% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Yr 1<br />

= 30<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

58<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

58<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


312<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Zaaiplaas<br />

Village<br />

Reticulatio<br />

ns<br />

(BSD/024/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Mooihoek<br />

Reticulatio<br />

n (Ga-<br />

Maroga,<br />

Mapea)<br />

(BSD/025/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househ<br />

olds<br />

served<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

1822 Number of<br />

households<br />

served<br />

20% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

1822 Number of<br />

households<br />

served<br />

20% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

1822 Yr 1 =<br />

18<br />

650<br />

000<br />

20% ( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

2<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

6<br />

500 0<br />

00<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

Connector<br />

Pipes and<br />

reticulation<br />

to Lebalelo<br />

South<br />

Villages(Dr<br />

iekop, Ga-<br />

Riba,<br />

Rivercross,<br />

percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

20%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

percentage<br />

completion<br />

20%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

percentage<br />

completion<br />

20%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

5<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

15 00<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

26 00<br />

MI<br />

G


313<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Ga-<br />

Maeseng,<br />

Mandela<br />

and<br />

France)<br />

(BSD/026/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Ga-<br />

Maphopha,<br />

Ga-<br />

Malekana,<br />

Ga-Masha,<br />

Mapea<br />

Connector<br />

Pipes and<br />

Reticulatio<br />

n<br />

(BSD/027/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Ga-Moloi<br />

Water<br />

Reticulatio<br />

n(BSD/028<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

percent<br />

agecom<br />

pletion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

50%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

50% %( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

percentagecompl<br />

etion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

50%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

50% %( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

percentagecompl<br />

etion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

50%( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

50% %( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

4<br />

900 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

9<br />

600 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 1<br />

=<br />

2 593<br />

739<br />

Yr 2<br />

=<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


3<strong>14</strong><br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Solovo<br />

Water<br />

reticulation<br />

(BDS/029/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Lebalelo<br />

North<br />

Water<br />

Reticulatio<br />

n<br />

(BSD/030/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Ga<br />

Nkwana<br />

Housing<br />

Reticulatio<br />

n<br />

(BSD/031/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

hiuseho<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

N/A<br />

5% %( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

2000 Number of<br />

hiuseholds served<br />

N/A<br />

5% %( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

2000 Number of<br />

hiuseholds served<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

4 797<br />

300<br />

N/A Yr 1=<br />

200<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

1 600<br />

000<br />

5% %( designs<br />

approved = 20%<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

600 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

8<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

11<br />

400 0<br />

00<br />

2000 Yr 1 =<br />

2 387<br />

000<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


315<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Taung<br />

Reticulatio<br />

n<br />

(BSD/032/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Praktiseer<br />

Water<br />

Supply<br />

(BSD/033/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Mabotsha<br />

Water<br />

Supply<br />

(BSD/034/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Communit<br />

y Water<br />

Supply for<br />

Mabopane<br />

&<br />

Moraleng<br />

(BSD/066/<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

hiuseho<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househ<br />

oleds<br />

served<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househ<br />

old<br />

served<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

800 Number of<br />

hiuseholds served<br />

4000 Number of<br />

householeds<br />

served<br />

800 Number of<br />

household served<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%<br />

construction<br />

complet=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

800 Number of<br />

hiuseholds served<br />

4000 Number of<br />

householeds<br />

served<br />

800 Number of<br />

household served<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%<br />

construction<br />

complet=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

800 Yr 1 =<br />

<strong>23</strong> 08<br />

0 000<br />

4000 Yr 1 =<br />

21 72<br />

0 000<br />

800 Yr 1 =<br />

7 175<br />

000<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%<br />

construction<br />

complet=80%)<br />

Yr =<br />

1 000<br />

000<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

W<br />

S<br />

O<br />

G


316<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Hotspots<br />

Project(BS<br />

D/060/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Hotspots<br />

Project<br />

(BSD/061/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Makhuduth<br />

amaga<br />

Hotspots<br />

Project<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

Yr 1=<br />

2 891<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

11 56<br />

8 000<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

455 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 1=<br />

9 278<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

28 13<br />

5 000<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

46<br />

891 0<br />

00<br />

Yr=<br />

3 626<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

M<br />

WI<br />

G<br />

M<br />

WI<br />

G<br />

M<br />

WI<br />

G


317<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

(BSD/062/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

505 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

18<br />

132 0<br />

00<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

Fetakgomo<br />

Hotspots<br />

Project<br />

(BSD/063/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Hotspots<br />

Project<br />

(BSD/064/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

100% (Designs<br />

Approved =20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete= 80%)<br />

Yr 1=<br />

376<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

1<br />

503 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

1<br />

879 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 1=<br />

13 02<br />

9 000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

30<br />

807 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

M<br />

WI<br />

G<br />

M<br />

WI<br />

G


318<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Oper<br />

ate<br />

and<br />

main<br />

tain<br />

wate<br />

r<br />

supp<br />

ly<br />

infra<br />

struc<br />

ture<br />

Project<br />

Repairs<br />

and<br />

maintenan<br />

ce<br />

(Water)(BS<br />

D/073/201<br />

3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Electricity<br />

Purchases<br />

(BSD/074/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Water<br />

Purchases<br />

(BSD/075/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

register<br />

ed<br />

incidenc<br />

es<br />

resolve<br />

d within<br />

<strong>14</strong> days<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

100% Percentage<br />

registered<br />

incidences<br />

resolved within <strong>14</strong><br />

days<br />

100% Percentage<br />

registered<br />

incidences<br />

resolved within <strong>14</strong><br />

days<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

69<br />

<strong>14</strong>5<br />

000<br />

100% Yr 1 =<br />

13 00<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

13 36<br />

7 000<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

13 74<br />

2 483<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

21 00<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 2=<br />

22<br />

071 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

<strong>23</strong> 15<br />

2 479<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

52 00<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M


319<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Impl<br />

eme<br />

Project<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

) 54 65<br />

2 000<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

57 32<br />

9 948<br />

Fuel and<br />

Lubricant<br />

Purchases<br />

(BSD/076/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Agency<br />

Services -<br />

Water<br />

(Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

)<br />

(BSD/077/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Moteti B<br />

(Zoetmelsf<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complai<br />

nce with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

agreem<br />

ent.<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

100% Compliance<br />

with SLA<br />

Percentage<br />

complaince with<br />

service level<br />

agreement.<br />

250 Number of<br />

Households<br />

100% Compliance<br />

with SLA<br />

Percentage<br />

complaince with<br />

service level<br />

agreement.<br />

250 Number of<br />

Households<br />

100% Compliance<br />

with SLA<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

3 000<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

3<br />

153 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

3 307<br />

497<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

400 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

420 4<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

440<br />

999<br />

250 Yr 1 =<br />

10<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M<br />

MI<br />

G


320<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

nt a<br />

Wate<br />

r<br />

Cons<br />

ervat<br />

ion<br />

and<br />

Wate<br />

r<br />

Dem<br />

and<br />

Man<br />

age<br />

ment<br />

Strat<br />

egy<br />

(Red<br />

uce<br />

nonr<br />

even<br />

ue<br />

wate<br />

r to<br />

40%)<br />

Project<br />

ontein)<br />

water Ret<br />

& Cost<br />

Recovery<br />

(BSD/035/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Jane Furse<br />

Water<br />

Demand<br />

manageme<br />

nt (<br />

BSD/036/2<br />

013/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Cost<br />

Recovery<br />

in<br />

Monsterlou<br />

s,<br />

Motetema<br />

and<br />

Tafelkop<br />

(BSD/037/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Househ<br />

olds<br />

Served<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Year 1<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

Served Served 900<br />

000<br />

20% (Design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete=80%)<br />

100% (design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

complete 80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

20% (Design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete=80%)<br />

100% (design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

complete 80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

20% (Design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Complete=80%)<br />

100% (design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

complete 80%)<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

1<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

7<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

450 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

10<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

4 500<br />

000<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


321<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Perc<br />

enta<br />

ge<br />

com<br />

pleti<br />

on<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Eradi<br />

catio<br />

n of<br />

supp<br />

ly<br />

throu<br />

gh<br />

wate<br />

r<br />

tank<br />

ers<br />

50%`<br />

Com<br />

pleti<br />

on of<br />

bulk<br />

Sanit<br />

ation<br />

Proje<br />

Project<br />

Flag<br />

Boshielo<br />

WCDM<br />

(BSD/002/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Reduction<br />

of<br />

backlogs<br />

Tankering<br />

(BSD/078/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Burgersfort<br />

WWTW<br />

7MI (New<br />

plant)<br />

(BSD/041/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

%<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

No of<br />

househ<br />

olds<br />

served<br />

through<br />

water<br />

tankers<br />

at least<br />

3 times<br />

a week<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

100% (design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

complete 80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

100% (design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

complete 80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

100% (design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

complete 80%)<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

3 500<br />

000<br />

5% % completion 60% % completion 100% See<br />

above<br />

1 000 No of households<br />

served through<br />

water tankers at<br />

least 3 times a<br />

week<br />

5% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

1 000 No of households<br />

served through<br />

water tankers at<br />

least 3 times a<br />

week<br />

5% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

Completion<br />

1 000 Yr 1 =<br />

1 000<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

2 102<br />

000<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

2 204<br />

998<br />

5% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

24 50<br />

0 700<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

60 00<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

A<br />

CI<br />

P<br />

N/<br />

A<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M<br />

MI<br />

G


322<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

cts 60<br />

000<br />

000<br />

Burgersfort<br />

WWTW<br />

7MI<br />

(Upgrading<br />

)<br />

(BSD/003/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Burgersfort<br />

WWTW<br />

7MI<br />

(Refurbish<br />

ment)<br />

(BSD/042/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Roosenkal<br />

WWWTW<br />

Upgrade<br />

(BSD/043/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=2%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20,%<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

Apel percent 20% (designs percentage 20% (designs percentage 20% (designs Yr 1 = MI<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

5 000<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

17 00<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

1 600<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

5 868<br />

000<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

A<br />

CI<br />

P<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G


3<strong>23</strong><br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Refu<br />

rbish<br />

ment<br />

of<br />

Bulk<br />

Sanit<br />

ation<br />

Facili<br />

ties<br />

Project<br />

Sewer<br />

WWTW<br />

(BSD/044/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Marble<br />

Hall<br />

WWTW –<br />

Effluent<br />

Line<br />

(BSD/004/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Refurbish<br />

ment of<br />

Dennilton<br />

Pump<br />

Station<br />

(BSD/069/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

percentage<br />

completion<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

percentage<br />

completion<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

5<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

22 00<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

6 500<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

6 000<br />

000<br />

Refurbish Percent 100% (designs Percentage 100% (designs Percentage 100% (designs Yr 1 = W<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

2 200<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

1 200<br />

000<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

G<br />

A<br />

CI<br />

P<br />

W<br />

S<br />

O<br />

G


324<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

ment of<br />

Motetema<br />

Sewer<br />

Pump<br />

stations<br />

and<br />

Network<br />

(BSD/070/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Refurbish<br />

ment of<br />

Elandskraa<br />

l Sewage<br />

Ponds<br />

(BSD/071/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Penge<br />

Upgrading<br />

of WWTW<br />

& WTW<br />

(BSD/072/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

Percentage<br />

completion<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

100% (designs<br />

approved=20%,<br />

Construction<br />

Approved=80%)<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

1 300<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

3<br />

500 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

5<br />

437 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

4 563<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

4<br />

000 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

9<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

S<br />

O<br />

G<br />

W<br />

S<br />

O<br />

G<br />

W<br />

S<br />

O<br />

G


325<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Provi<br />

sion<br />

of<br />

hous<br />

ehol<br />

d<br />

sanit<br />

ation<br />

facilit<br />

ies<br />

(60%<br />

of<br />

backl<br />

og)<br />

Project<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

20<strong>14</strong>) 000 0<br />

00<br />

VIP<br />

Backlog<br />

Sewerage<br />

services –<br />

Repairs<br />

and<br />

Maintenan<br />

ce<br />

(BSD/079/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

%<br />

complet<br />

ion<br />

%<br />

register<br />

ed<br />

incidenc<br />

es<br />

resolve<br />

d within<br />

<strong>14</strong> days<br />

95% % completion 95% % completion 95% Yr 1 =<br />

<strong>14</strong>7 7<br />

13<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

3 000<br />

000<br />

100% % registered<br />

incidences<br />

resolved within <strong>14</strong><br />

days<br />

100% % registered<br />

incidences<br />

resolved within <strong>14</strong><br />

days<br />

100% Yr 1 =<br />

654 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

687<br />

354<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

721<br />

034<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M


326<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Project<br />

Sewerage<br />

Services -<br />

Sucking for<br />

VIP Toilets<br />

(BSD/080/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Agency<br />

Services –<br />

Sanitation<br />

(Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

)<br />

(BSD/081/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Agency<br />

Services –<br />

Sanitation<br />

(Ephraim<br />

Mogale)<br />

(BSD/082/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

toilets<br />

sucked<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complia<br />

nce with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

agreem<br />

ent<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

1000 Number of toilets<br />

sucked<br />

100% compliance<br />

with SLA<br />

Percentage<br />

compliance with<br />

service level<br />

agreement<br />

1000 Number of toilets<br />

sucked<br />

100% compliance<br />

with SLA<br />

Percentage<br />

compliance with<br />

service level<br />

agreement<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

1000 Yr 1 =<br />

4 000<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

4 500<br />

000<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

5 000<br />

100% compliance<br />

with SLA<br />

000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

<strong>14</strong>0 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

<strong>14</strong>7 1<br />

40<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

154<br />

350<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

90 00<br />

0<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

94 41<br />

0<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

99<br />

036<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M


327<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

To<br />

mai<br />

ntai<br />

n<br />

acc<br />

urat<br />

e<br />

wat<br />

er<br />

qual<br />

ity<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Impr<br />

oved<br />

Blue<br />

and<br />

Gree<br />

n<br />

Drop<br />

ratin<br />

g<br />

Project<br />

Apel<br />

Sanitation<br />

(BSD/046/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Tafelkop<br />

reticulation<br />

(BSD/047/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Laboratori<br />

es and<br />

Chemicals<br />

(BSD/083/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househ<br />

olds<br />

served<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

eion<br />

Percent<br />

age of<br />

availabil<br />

ity of<br />

chemic<br />

als<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

900 Number of<br />

households<br />

served<br />

30% (design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

100% (availability of<br />

chemicals)<br />

Percentage<br />

completeion<br />

Percentage of<br />

availability of<br />

chemicals<br />

900 Number of<br />

households<br />

served<br />

30% (design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

100% (availability of<br />

chemicals)<br />

Percentage<br />

completeion<br />

Percentage of<br />

availability of<br />

chemicals<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

900 Yr 1=<br />

1 654<br />

700<br />

30% (design<br />

approved=20%,<br />

construction<br />

complete=80%)<br />

100% (availability of<br />

chemicals)<br />

Yr 1=<br />

30 00<br />

0 000<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

5<br />

300 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

6<br />

306 0<br />

00<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

6 6<strong>14</strong><br />

994<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

MI<br />

G<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M<br />

To<br />

ens<br />

ure<br />

prud<br />

Profession<br />

al Fees<br />

(BSD/084/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complia<br />

nce with<br />

100% Percentage<br />

compliance with<br />

service level<br />

agreements<br />

100% Percentage<br />

compliance with<br />

service level<br />

agreements<br />

100% Yr 1 =<br />

2 000<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M


328<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

ent<br />

fina<br />

ncial<br />

man<br />

age<br />

men<br />

t<br />

To<br />

prov<br />

ide<br />

data<br />

on<br />

road<br />

net<br />

wor<br />

ks<br />

Coo<br />

rdin<br />

atio<br />

n of<br />

Infra<br />

stru<br />

ctur<br />

e<br />

with<br />

relat<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

Impl<br />

eme<br />

ntati<br />

on of<br />

RRA<br />

MS<br />

Prog<br />

ram<br />

me<br />

Facili<br />

tate<br />

for<br />

com<br />

mon<br />

obje<br />

ctive<br />

achi<br />

eve<br />

ment<br />

Project<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

) service<br />

level<br />

agreem<br />

ents<br />

Implement<br />

ation of<br />

RRAMS<br />

Programm<br />

e<br />

(BSD/065/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

IGR<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

complet<br />

ion of<br />

activitie<br />

s in the<br />

annual<br />

implem<br />

entation<br />

plan<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

meeting<br />

s held<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

100% (progress as<br />

per annual business<br />

plan)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion of<br />

activities in the<br />

annual<br />

implementation<br />

plan<br />

8 Number of<br />

meetings held<br />

100% (progress as<br />

per annual business<br />

plan)<br />

Percentage<br />

completion of<br />

activities in the<br />

annual<br />

implementation<br />

plan<br />

8 Number of<br />

meetings held<br />

100% (progress as<br />

per annual business<br />

plan)<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

2 102<br />

000<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

2 204<br />

998<br />

Yr 1 =<br />

1 781<br />

000<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

2 063<br />

000<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

2 113<br />

000<br />

8 Yr 1 =<br />

10 00<br />

0<br />

Yr 2 =<br />

10 51<br />

0<br />

Yr 3 =<br />

11<br />

025<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

RT<br />

SI<br />

G<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M


329<br />

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA: Access to basic services and infrastructural development<br />

Obj<br />

ecti<br />

ve<br />

ed<br />

sect<br />

ors<br />

To<br />

enh<br />

anc<br />

e<br />

own<br />

ersh<br />

ip of<br />

local<br />

facili<br />

ties<br />

To<br />

enh<br />

anc<br />

e<br />

forw<br />

ard<br />

plan<br />

ning<br />

Strat<br />

egie<br />

s<br />

s<br />

By<br />

enha<br />

ncin<br />

g<br />

awar<br />

enes<br />

s for<br />

core<br />

com<br />

pete<br />

ncies<br />

Project<br />

Transfer of<br />

taxi ranks<br />

to locals<br />

(BSD/085/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

planning(B<br />

SD/086/20<br />

13/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicat<br />

or<br />

Number<br />

of taxi<br />

ranks<br />

tranfere<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

approve<br />

d plans<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

6 Number of taxi<br />

ranks tranfered<br />

5 Number of<br />

approved plans<br />

6 Number of taxi<br />

ranks tranfered<br />

5 Number of<br />

approved plans<br />

MTER<br />

F<br />

Budg<br />

et<br />

Estim<br />

ate<br />

6 Yr<br />

1=R70<br />

0 000<br />

5 R1 91<br />

1 000<br />

Fu<br />

nd<br />

in<br />

g<br />

So<br />

ur<br />

ce<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M<br />

S<br />

D<br />

M


330<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

To<br />

promote<br />

sustainabl<br />

e EMS<br />

services<br />

Compile list<br />

of<br />

equipment<br />

to be<br />

serviced<br />

and<br />

maintained.<br />

Repair of<br />

equipment<br />

as and<br />

when<br />

needed<br />

EMS<br />

maintenan<br />

ce<br />

equipment<br />

(BSD/087/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

% repair, 100% % repair, 100% % repair, 100% repair,<br />

service and repair, service and repair, service and service and<br />

maintenanc service and maintenanc service and maintenanc maintenance<br />

e of EMS maintenance e<br />

maintenanc e<br />

equipments of EMS<br />

e<br />

equipments<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R 250,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R 262,750<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R 275,624<br />

SDM<br />

Appointmen<br />

t of term<br />

contractors<br />

for<br />

servicing,


331<br />

maintenanc<br />

e and<br />

repairs<br />

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objectiv<br />

e<br />

To<br />

promote<br />

sustaina<br />

ble EMS<br />

services<br />

Strategies<br />

Compile<br />

specificatio<br />

ns for<br />

tender<br />

Submit to<br />

specificatio<br />

n committee<br />

Advertise<br />

tender and<br />

tender<br />

processes<br />

Monitor<br />

project plan<br />

Project<br />

Veld Fire<br />

Appliances –<br />

x1 4x4 van<br />

2 x sedan<br />

service<br />

vehicles.<br />

Replacement<br />

of Major<br />

Pumper fire<br />

engine<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

1 Veld Fire<br />

Appliances,<br />

sedans<br />

1 Veld Fire<br />

Appliances,<br />

2X sedans<br />

purchased<br />

1X 4X4<br />

1 Veld<br />

Fire<br />

Appliance<br />

s,<br />

sedans<br />

Major<br />

Pumper<br />

1 Veld Fire<br />

Appliances,<br />

2 sedans<br />

purchased<br />

1 Major<br />

Pumper<br />

purchased<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R0<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R1,100,305<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R1,359,320<br />

SDM


332<br />

and delivery<br />

Hazmat<br />

Trailer<br />

delivered<br />

and<br />

operational<br />

Hazmat<br />

Trailer<br />

delivered<br />

and<br />

operational<br />

.<br />

EMS<br />

equipments<br />

Water<br />

rescue<br />

equipment<br />

delivered<br />

and<br />

operational.<br />

water<br />

rescue<br />

equipment<br />

purchased,<br />

delivered<br />

and<br />

operational<br />

R100 000


333<br />

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To<br />

promote<br />

sustainabl<br />

e EMS<br />

services<br />

Compile list<br />

of foam and<br />

decontamin<br />

ation<br />

detergent<br />

types and<br />

quantities<br />

per station<br />

Submit to<br />

specificatio<br />

ns<br />

committee<br />

Request for<br />

quotations<br />

and<br />

procuremen<br />

t processes<br />

Delivery<br />

and<br />

fire<br />

fighting<br />

foam and<br />

decontami<br />

nation<br />

detergents<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

% supply and<br />

delivery of<br />

foam and<br />

decontaminat<br />

ion<br />

detergents<br />

100%<br />

supplied.<br />

% supply<br />

and delivery<br />

of foam and<br />

decontamin<br />

ation<br />

detergents<br />

100%<br />

supplied.<br />

% supply<br />

and delivery<br />

of foam and<br />

decontamin<br />

ation<br />

detergents<br />

100%<br />

supplied.<br />

SDM


334<br />

distribution<br />

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To Develop list<br />

promote of protective<br />

sustainabl and station<br />

e EMS uniform<br />

services needed<br />

Submit to<br />

specifications<br />

committee<br />

Station<br />

uniform and<br />

protective<br />

clothing<br />

(BSD/088/2<br />

013/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Percentage<br />

purchase of<br />

station<br />

uniform and<br />

protective<br />

clothing<br />

100%<br />

purchase of<br />

station<br />

uniform and<br />

protective<br />

clothing<br />

Supply of<br />

station<br />

uniform for<br />

new<br />

appointmen<br />

t and<br />

volunteers<br />

100%<br />

Supplied of<br />

station<br />

uniform for<br />

new<br />

appointmen<br />

t and<br />

volunteers<br />

Supply of<br />

protective<br />

clothing and<br />

equipment<br />

100%<br />

supplied of<br />

protective<br />

clothing and<br />

equipment<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R800 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R 840 800<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R 881 999<br />

SDM<br />

Advertise<br />

tender and<br />

tender<br />

processes<br />

Delivery and<br />

distribution


335<br />

Disaster Management Services<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fun<br />

ding<br />

Sour<br />

ce<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To<br />

promote<br />

sustainabl<br />

e EMS<br />

services<br />

Appoint<br />

term<br />

contractors<br />

for supply<br />

of food and<br />

food<br />

parcels,<br />

first day of<br />

disaster<br />

happening<br />

Disaster<br />

Relief<br />

material<br />

(BSD/089/20<br />

13/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Percentage 100% Percentage 100% Percentage 100%<br />

purchase of supply of purchase of supply of purchase of supply of<br />

disaster disaster disaster disaster disaster disaster<br />

relief relief relief relief relief relief<br />

material as material as material as material as material as material as<br />

and when and when and when and when and when and when<br />

required required required required required required<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R480,00<br />

0<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R504,48<br />

0<br />

2015/2016:R529,19<br />

9<br />

SDM<br />

Provide<br />

relief<br />

material as<br />

and when<br />

needed<br />

Advertise<br />

tender and<br />

tender<br />

processes<br />

Distribution


336<br />

as needed<br />

DISASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To Compile<br />

promote specifications<br />

sustainable mitigating the x6 4x4<br />

EMS severity of bakkies<br />

services disasters,<br />

emergency<br />

preparedness,<br />

rapid and<br />

effective<br />

response to<br />

disasters and<br />

post disaster<br />

recovery for<br />

tender<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

6 Disaster<br />

Management<br />

bakkies<br />

6 bakkies<br />

purchased<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R0<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R0<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R 0<br />

SDM


337<br />

DISASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To promote<br />

professional<br />

developmen<br />

t<br />

Develop a<br />

list of<br />

employees<br />

that are<br />

registered<br />

with<br />

professional<br />

bodies<br />

Submit<br />

request<br />

To pay<br />

annual fees<br />

Generate<br />

an internal<br />

memorandu<br />

m to finance<br />

Membershi<br />

p fees<br />

(BSD/090/2<br />

013/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Percentage<br />

payment of<br />

registration<br />

or<br />

membershi<br />

p fees<br />

100%<br />

payment of<br />

registration<br />

or<br />

membershi<br />

p fees<br />

Percentage<br />

payment of<br />

registration<br />

or<br />

membershi<br />

p fees<br />

100%<br />

payment of<br />

registration<br />

or<br />

membershi<br />

p fees<br />

Percentage<br />

payment of<br />

registration<br />

or<br />

membershi<br />

p fees<br />

100%<br />

payment of<br />

registration<br />

or<br />

membershi<br />

p fees<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R 50,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R 52,550<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R 55,124<br />

SDM<br />

Proofofpay<br />

ment and<br />

membershi<br />

p


338<br />

DISASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To enhance Develop an<br />

community annual<br />

knowledge program for<br />

base awareness<br />

Do research<br />

on the<br />

vulnerability<br />

of the<br />

<strong>District</strong> to<br />

certain<br />

hazards<br />

Emergenc<br />

y<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

campaign<br />

(BSD/091/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Number of<br />

emergenc<br />

y<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

campaign<br />

held<br />

20emerge<br />

ncy<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

campaign<br />

held<br />

Number of<br />

emergenc<br />

y<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

campaign<br />

held<br />

20<br />

emergenc<br />

y<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

campaign<br />

held<br />

Number of<br />

emergenc<br />

y<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

campaign<br />

held<br />

20<br />

emergenc<br />

y<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

campaign<br />

held<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R 50 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R 52 550<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R 55 125<br />

SDM


339<br />

DISASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To Hold<br />

enhance stakeholder<br />

communit meetings<br />

y<br />

knowledge<br />

base<br />

Develop an<br />

Integrated<br />

Arrive Alive<br />

Operational<br />

Plan<br />

Special<br />

Operations<br />

High<br />

Density Day<br />

(Arrive<br />

Alive)(BSD/<br />

092/<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Number of<br />

Special<br />

Operations<br />

High<br />

Density Day<br />

(Arrive<br />

Alive)<br />

undertaken<br />

2 special<br />

operations<br />

high density<br />

Days<br />

undertaken<br />

Number of<br />

Special<br />

Operations<br />

High<br />

Density Day<br />

(Arrive<br />

Alive)<br />

undertaken<br />

2 special<br />

operations<br />

high density<br />

Days<br />

undertaken<br />

Number of<br />

Special<br />

Operations<br />

High<br />

Density Day<br />

(Arrive<br />

Alive)<br />

undertaken<br />

2 special<br />

operations<br />

high density<br />

Days<br />

undertaken<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R 190,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R 199,000<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R 209 475<br />

SDM<br />

Request or<br />

search for<br />

funding<br />

partners<br />

Launch the<br />

Arrive Alive<br />

and<br />

implement<br />

the plan


340<br />

DISASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To Needs<br />

develop analysis<br />

skills<br />

Develop<br />

specifications<br />

EMS<br />

Training<br />

Academy<br />

(BSD/093/2<br />

013/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Percentage<br />

purchase of<br />

EMS<br />

academy<br />

stationery<br />

100%<br />

purchase of<br />

EMS<br />

academy<br />

stationery<br />

Percentage<br />

purchase of<br />

EMS<br />

academy<br />

stationery<br />

100%<br />

purchase of<br />

EMS<br />

academy<br />

stationery<br />

Percentage<br />

purchase of<br />

EMS<br />

academy<br />

stationery<br />

100%<br />

purchase of<br />

EMS<br />

academy<br />

stationery<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R 130 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R 136 630<br />

SDM<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R <strong>14</strong>3 325<br />

MUNICIPAL HEALTH SERVICES (SERVICE DELIVERY)<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To promote Get the Air quality<br />

environmenta existing Management<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

100%<br />

monitorin<br />

# required<br />

capacity<br />

Two<br />

Officers<br />

All Locals<br />

having a<br />

One AQMI<br />

installed in<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

:<br />

SDM


341<br />

l and<br />

personal<br />

health<br />

AQMI into<br />

continuous<br />

and<br />

efficient<br />

functionality<br />

Build<br />

enough<br />

capacity to<br />

carry<br />

Atmospheri<br />

c Emission<br />

Licensing<br />

function<br />

from the<br />

Province<br />

(BSD/094/<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

monitoring<br />

of air<br />

quality<br />

pollutants<br />

g of air<br />

quality<br />

pollutants<br />

workshop<br />

s<br />

attended<br />

capacitate<br />

d in each<br />

local<br />

municipalit<br />

y<br />

monitorin<br />

g<br />

instrumen<br />

t linked to<br />

each<br />

other<br />

each local<br />

municipalit<br />

y<br />

R 1 000<br />

000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

:<br />

R 1 051<br />

000<br />

2015/2016<br />

:<br />

R 1 102<br />

499<br />

Provide<br />

additional<br />

monitoring<br />

equipment’s<br />

to other<br />

locals


342<br />

MUNICIPAL HEALTH SERVICES (SERVICE DELIVERY)<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To Compile MHS<br />

promote strategy and<br />

environme get it approved<br />

ntal and by all council<br />

personal structures<br />

health<br />

Getting<br />

personnel<br />

acclimatised<br />

and putting<br />

systems and<br />

processes in<br />

place for full<br />

implementation<br />

of all nine<br />

programmes<br />

Gazetting of<br />

By-laws<br />

Awareness on<br />

MHS<br />

Programme<br />

(BSD/095/201<br />

3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Percentage<br />

Percentag<br />

Percentage<br />

MHS<br />

e MHS<br />

MHS<br />

awareness<br />

awareness<br />

awareness<br />

program<br />

program<br />

program<br />

conducted<br />

conducted<br />

conducted<br />

100%<br />

MHS<br />

awarene<br />

ss<br />

program<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

100%<br />

MHS<br />

awaren<br />

ess<br />

progra<br />

m<br />

conduc<br />

ted<br />

100% MHS<br />

awareness<br />

program<br />

conducted<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R 80 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R 84 080<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R 88 200<br />

National<br />

Treasury


343<br />

MUNICIPAL HEALTH SERVICES (SERVICE DELIVERY)<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fundi<br />

ng<br />

Sourc<br />

e<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To promote List all the days HIV/AIDS<br />

environmenta that deal with Strategy<br />

l and HIV/Aids<br />

personal<br />

health<br />

Getting personnel<br />

acclimatised and<br />

putting systems<br />

and processes in<br />

place for full<br />

implementation of<br />

all nine<br />

programmes<br />

Placing them in<br />

strategic organic<br />

specialisation for<br />

future personal<br />

development<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Health<br />

Council<br />

(BSD/097/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Number of 4 initiatives Number of 4 initiatives Number of 4 initiatives<br />

initiatives conducted for initiatives conducted for initiatives conducted for<br />

conducted HIV/AIDS conducted for HIV/AIDS conducted HIV/AIDS<br />

for<br />

strategy HIV/AIDS strategy for strategy<br />

HIV/AIDS implementatio strategy implementati HIV/AIDS implementatio<br />

strategy n<br />

implementatio on<br />

strategy n<br />

implementat<br />

n<br />

implement<br />

ion<br />

ation<br />

Percentage<br />

support to<br />

district<br />

health<br />

council<br />

100% support<br />

to district<br />

health council<br />

Percentage<br />

support to<br />

district health<br />

council<br />

100%<br />

support to<br />

district health<br />

council<br />

Percentag<br />

e support<br />

to district<br />

health<br />

council<br />

100% support<br />

to district<br />

health council<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R 500 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/15:<br />

R 525 500<br />

2015/16:<br />

R 551 250<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R20,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R21,020<br />

SDM


344<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R22,049<br />

Talafatsa<br />

Sekhukhu<br />

ne<br />

(Nursery)(<br />

BSD/098/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Percentage<br />

establishme<br />

nt of<br />

nursery<br />

100%<br />

establishment<br />

of nursery<br />

Percentage<br />

establishment<br />

of nursery<br />

100%<br />

establishmen<br />

t of nursery<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

establishm<br />

ent of<br />

nursery<br />

100%<br />

establishment<br />

of nursery<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R100,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R105,100<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R110,249<br />

MHS<br />

equipment<br />

s<br />

(BSD/099/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

)<br />

Percentage<br />

MHS<br />

equipments<br />

purchased<br />

100%<br />

purchased<br />

Percentage<br />

MHS<br />

equipments<br />

purchased<br />

100%<br />

purchased<br />

Percentag<br />

e MHS<br />

equipment<br />

s<br />

purchased<br />

100%<br />

purchased<br />

R50 000


345<br />

Sports, Arts and Culture development<br />

Objective<br />

To<br />

promote<br />

mass<br />

participatio<br />

n in sports,<br />

art and<br />

culture<br />

Strategies<br />

Project<br />

Executive<br />

Mayor’s<br />

marathon<br />

(BSD/100/201<br />

13/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 R100 000 SDM<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Number of<br />

Executive<br />

Mayor’s<br />

marathon<br />

1 Number of<br />

Executive<br />

Mayor’s<br />

marathon<br />

1 Number of<br />

Executive<br />

Mayor’s<br />

marathon<br />

1<br />

Executive<br />

Mayors Cup<br />

(BSD/101/201<br />

3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Sports<br />

Academy<br />

(BSD/103/201<br />

3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives to<br />

support<br />

sports, arts<br />

and culture<br />

developmen<br />

t conducted<br />

6 Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

to support<br />

sports,<br />

arts and<br />

culture<br />

developme<br />

nt<br />

conducted<br />

6 Number of<br />

initiatives to<br />

support<br />

sports, arts<br />

and culture<br />

developmen<br />

t conducted<br />

6 R946 912 SDM<br />

Tournament of<br />

old aged<br />

(BSD/104/201<br />

3/20<strong>14</strong>)


346<br />

Support to all<br />

sports codes<br />

(BSD/105/201<br />

3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Heritage,<br />

cultural show<br />

and exhibition<br />

(BSD/106/201<br />

3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Language<br />

Promotion<br />

(BSD/107/201<br />

3/20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Arts and<br />

Culture<br />

Capacity<br />

Building(BSD/<br />

108/<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4)


347<br />

5.4. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (LED)<br />

LED with objectives, targets and budget<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To conduct seminars<br />

for small businesses<br />

To provide support<br />

to SMMEs and<br />

cooperatives<br />

Conduct<br />

seminars for<br />

small<br />

businesses<br />

on supply<br />

chain<br />

processes<br />

Support<br />

SMME’s and<br />

cooperatives<br />

with<br />

production<br />

inputs<br />

Small<br />

business<br />

seminar<br />

(LED/001/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

SMME and<br />

cooperative<br />

s Support<br />

(LED/002/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

seminars<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

SMME’s/<br />

cooperati<br />

ves<br />

supporte<br />

d with<br />

productio<br />

n inputs<br />

5 Number<br />

of<br />

seminars<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

5 Number<br />

of<br />

SMME’s/<br />

cooperati<br />

ves<br />

supporte<br />

d with<br />

productio<br />

n inputs<br />

5 Number<br />

of<br />

seminars<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

5 Number<br />

of<br />

SMME’s/<br />

cooperati<br />

ves<br />

supporte<br />

d with<br />

productio<br />

n inputs<br />

5 <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R150,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R157,500<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R165,375<br />

TOTAL: R472, 875<br />

5 <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R300,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R315,599.40<br />

2015/2016: 330,750<br />

TOTAL:<br />

R946,349.40


348<br />

To provide platform<br />

for SMMEs<br />

exhibitions<br />

To foster municipal<br />

partnerships<br />

Expose<br />

SMME’s to<br />

market<br />

exhibitions<br />

Municipal<br />

partnerships<br />

Market<br />

exhibitions<br />

(LED/003/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Municipal<br />

partnerships<br />

(LED/004/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

and<br />

equipme<br />

nts<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

SMME’s<br />

exposed<br />

to market<br />

exhibition<br />

s<br />

and<br />

equipme<br />

nts<br />

4 Number<br />

of<br />

SMME’s<br />

exposed<br />

to market<br />

exhibition<br />

s<br />

and<br />

equipme<br />

nts<br />

4 Number<br />

of<br />

SMME’s<br />

exposed<br />

to market<br />

exhibition<br />

s<br />

4 <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> R150,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R157,500<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R165,375<br />

TOTAL: R472,875<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> R0<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015 R210,200<br />

2015/2016<br />

R220,499.80<br />

SDA’s LED projects<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To promote<br />

Development Fresh<br />

sustainable rural of agroprocessing<br />

Produce<br />

economies through<br />

Market.<br />

agricultural and initiatives<br />

agro-processing<br />

Citrus<br />

development<br />

Processing<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

%<br />

impleme<br />

ntation of<br />

fresh<br />

produce<br />

and<br />

40 %<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

fresh<br />

produce<br />

and citrus<br />

%<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

fresh<br />

produce<br />

and citrus<br />

40%<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

fresh<br />

produce<br />

and citrus<br />

%<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

fresh<br />

produce<br />

and citrus<br />

40%<br />

implem<br />

entatio<br />

n of<br />

fresh<br />

produc<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R1 000<br />

000.00<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R700.000<br />

2015/2016:R600.000<br />

SDA.<br />

Private<br />

Fundin<br />

g


349<br />

To ensure small<br />

town and settlement<br />

regeneration<br />

To develop and<br />

market key tourism<br />

clusters<br />

To develop<br />

sustainable mining<br />

communities<br />

Regeneration<br />

of small<br />

towns in<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Tourism<br />

development<br />

and<br />

marketing.<br />

SLP and<br />

Enterprise<br />

Development.<br />

Plant.<br />

Animal<br />

Breeding<br />

Developme<br />

nt<br />

Jane Furse<br />

and<br />

Steelpoort<br />

Regeneratio<br />

n<br />

Potlake and<br />

Flag<br />

Boshielo<br />

Developme<br />

nt<br />

Job<br />

Creation<br />

Reports<br />

Competitive<br />

citrus<br />

plant<br />

# small<br />

towns<br />

regenerat<br />

ion<br />

#<br />

business<br />

plans<br />

develope<br />

d<br />

# public<br />

private<br />

partnersh<br />

ip signing<br />

plant plant. %<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

chicken<br />

abattoir.<br />

Scoping<br />

of two<br />

small<br />

towns for<br />

regenerat<br />

ion.<br />

2<br />

business<br />

plans<br />

5 public<br />

private<br />

partners<br />

to the<br />

Two<br />

more<br />

small<br />

towns<br />

regenerat<br />

ed<br />

Investor<br />

and<br />

funding<br />

attraction<br />

%<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

the<br />

plant.<br />

30%<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

chicken<br />

abattoir.<br />

50%<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

small<br />

town<br />

regenerat<br />

ion.<br />

2 investor<br />

and<br />

funding<br />

attracted<br />

50 %<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

the<br />

plant. %<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

chicken<br />

abattoir.<br />

# small<br />

towns<br />

regenerat<br />

ion.<br />

%<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

tourism<br />

facilities<br />

%<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

the<br />

e and<br />

citrus<br />

plant.<br />

30%<br />

implem<br />

entatio<br />

n of<br />

chicken<br />

abattoir<br />

.<br />

100%<br />

implem<br />

entatio<br />

n of<br />

town<br />

regener<br />

ation.<br />

50%<br />

implem<br />

entatio<br />

n of<br />

tourism<br />

facilitie<br />

s<br />

100 %<br />

implem<br />

entatio<br />

n of the<br />

Total: R<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong>: R1.2m<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R1 200.000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R700.000<br />

2015/2016:R650.000<br />

Total: R<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R800.000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R500.000<br />

2015/2016: R500.000<br />

Total: R<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R800.000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R300.000<br />

SDA,<br />

Private<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

SDA,<br />

Private<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

IDC,<br />

SDA,<br />

Private<br />

Fundin


350<br />

Supplier<br />

Developme<br />

nt Program<br />

(CSDP)<br />

for the<br />

project<br />

project CSDP CSDP CSDP CSDP 2015/2016:R500.000<br />

Total: R<br />

g


351<br />

5.5. FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY WITH OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND BUDGET<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To ensure<br />

sufficient<br />

reserve funds to<br />

address asset<br />

renewal<br />

Maximisation<br />

of own<br />

revenue<br />

towards<br />

Capital<br />

Replacement<br />

Reserves<br />

capital<br />

replaceme<br />

nt reserve<br />

(FV/001/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Percentage<br />

improvement<br />

in capital<br />

Replacement<br />

reserves<br />

8% on<br />

Improveme<br />

nt in Capital<br />

Replaceme<br />

nt Reserves<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

improvem<br />

ent in<br />

capital<br />

Replacem<br />

ent<br />

reserves<br />

10% on<br />

investmen<br />

t in capital<br />

replaceme<br />

nt<br />

reserves<br />

Percentage<br />

improveme<br />

nt in capital<br />

Replaceme<br />

nt reserves<br />

15% on<br />

investmen<br />

t in capital<br />

replaceme<br />

nt<br />

reserves<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R7m<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R20,2m<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R22,8m<br />

SDM<br />

Total:<br />

R60,86m


352<br />

To ensure<br />

preparation and<br />

implementation<br />

of realistic<br />

budget for the<br />

municipality<br />

To ensure<br />

improved Audit<br />

Opinion<br />

Preparation<br />

and<br />

monitoring of<br />

budget<br />

Improved<br />

audit opinion<br />

Budget<br />

preparatio<br />

n<br />

(FV/002/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Improved<br />

Audit<br />

Opinion<br />

(FV/003/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentage<br />

realistic and<br />

credible<br />

budget<br />

prepared<br />

Percentage<br />

improvement<br />

of audit<br />

opinion<br />

100%<br />

realistic and<br />

credible<br />

budget<br />

prepared:<br />

1.Cash<br />

backed<br />

30%<br />

2.Timelines<br />

30%<br />

3.Amendme<br />

nds made<br />

2x40%<br />

100%<br />

improveme<br />

nt of audit<br />

opinion 1.<br />

Addressing<br />

prior year<br />

audit issues<br />

(50%). 2.<br />

Strenghthen<br />

ing internal<br />

controls<br />

(50%)<br />

Percentag<br />

e realistic<br />

and<br />

credible<br />

budget<br />

prepared<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

improvem<br />

ent of<br />

audit<br />

opinion<br />

100%<br />

realistic<br />

and<br />

credible<br />

budget<br />

prepared:<br />

1.Cash<br />

backed<br />

30%<br />

2.Timeline<br />

s 30%<br />

3.Amend<br />

mends<br />

made<br />

2x40%<br />

100%<br />

improvem<br />

ent of<br />

audit<br />

opinion 1.<br />

Addressin<br />

g prior<br />

year audit<br />

issues<br />

(50%). 2.<br />

Strenghth<br />

ening<br />

internal<br />

controls<br />

(50%)<br />

Percentage<br />

realistic and<br />

credible<br />

budget<br />

prepared<br />

Percentage<br />

improveme<br />

nt of audit<br />

opinion<br />

100%<br />

realistic<br />

and<br />

credible<br />

budget<br />

prepared:<br />

1.Cash<br />

backed<br />

30%<br />

2.Timeline<br />

s 30%<br />

3.Amend<br />

mends<br />

made<br />

2x40%<br />

100%<br />

improvem<br />

ent of<br />

audit<br />

opinion 1.<br />

Addressin<br />

g prior<br />

year audit<br />

issues<br />

(50%). 2.<br />

Strenghth<br />

ening<br />

internal<br />

controls<br />

(50%)<br />

N/A<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R331,644<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R<br />

450,000<br />

2015/2016:R<br />

472,050<br />

Total:<br />

R1,253,715<br />

N/A<br />

SDM


353<br />

To ensure that<br />

assets and<br />

inventory are<br />

adequately<br />

accounted for,<br />

properly<br />

recorded and<br />

safe guarded<br />

Recording,<br />

valuation of<br />

municipal<br />

assets and<br />

Unbundling<br />

of<br />

Infrastructura<br />

l projects<br />

Asset<br />

managem<br />

ent<br />

(FV/004/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentage<br />

GRAP<br />

compliant<br />

FAR<br />

100%<br />

GRAP<br />

compliant<br />

FAR(Unbun<br />

dled Assets,<br />

safeguardin<br />

g movable<br />

and<br />

immovable<br />

assets 20%,<br />

disposals<br />

10%,<br />

valuation<br />

30%,<br />

records<br />

keeping<br />

10%)<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

GRAP<br />

compliant<br />

FAR<br />

100%<br />

GRAP<br />

compliant<br />

FAR(Unbu<br />

ndled<br />

Assets,<br />

updated<br />

movable<br />

and<br />

immovabl<br />

e assets<br />

20%,<br />

disposals<br />

10%,<br />

valuation<br />

30%,<br />

records<br />

keeping<br />

10%)<br />

Percentage<br />

GRAP<br />

compliant<br />

FAR<br />

100%<br />

GRAP<br />

compliant<br />

FAR(Unbu<br />

ndled<br />

Assets,<br />

updated<br />

movable<br />

and<br />

immovabl<br />

e assets<br />

20%,<br />

disposals<br />

10%,<br />

valuation<br />

30%,<br />

records<br />

keeping<br />

10%)<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R6,890,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R3M<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R2M<br />

Total:<br />

R11,9M<br />

Recording<br />

and valuing<br />

of all<br />

municipal<br />

inventory<br />

items.<br />

Inventory<br />

Managem<br />

ent<br />

(Stores<br />

and<br />

material)<br />

(FV/005/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentage<br />

of updated<br />

inventory<br />

register<br />

80%<br />

updated<br />

inventory<br />

register(pur<br />

chases<br />

50%,<br />

valuation<br />

20%,<br />

disposals<br />

5%, record<br />

keeping<br />

10%,<br />

Percentag<br />

e of<br />

updated<br />

inventory<br />

register<br />

100%<br />

updated<br />

inventory<br />

register<br />

(purchase<br />

s 50%,<br />

valuation<br />

20%,<br />

disposals<br />

5%,<br />

record<br />

keeping<br />

Percentage<br />

of updated<br />

inventory<br />

register<br />

100%<br />

updated<br />

inventory<br />

register<br />

(purchase<br />

s 50%,<br />

valuation<br />

20%,<br />

disposals<br />

5%,<br />

record<br />

keeping<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R1,3M<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R1,366,300<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R1,433,249<br />

Total:<br />

R4,099,549<br />

None


354<br />

safeguardin<br />

g 15%)<br />

10%,<br />

safeguardi<br />

ng 15%)<br />

10%,<br />

safeguardi<br />

ng 15%)<br />

To ensure<br />

prudent<br />

expenditure<br />

management<br />

To ensure<br />

proper<br />

management of<br />

documents<br />

Process all<br />

invoices<br />

received as<br />

per service<br />

standards<br />

target date<br />

Adhering to<br />

document<br />

management<br />

process flow.<br />

Expenditur<br />

e<br />

Managem<br />

ent<br />

(FV/007/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Document<br />

managem<br />

ent<br />

(FV/006/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentage<br />

of creditors<br />

reconciled<br />

and paid<br />

within 30<br />

days of<br />

invoice date<br />

Percentage<br />

documents<br />

scanned and<br />

filed as per<br />

process plan<br />

100% of<br />

creditors<br />

paid within<br />

30 days of<br />

invoice date<br />

(reconciliati<br />

on 50% and<br />

payments<br />

50%)<br />

100%<br />

documents<br />

scanned<br />

and filed as<br />

per process<br />

plan<br />

(electronic<br />

filing 50%,<br />

manual<br />

filing 50%)<br />

Percentag<br />

e of<br />

creditors<br />

within 30<br />

days of<br />

invoice<br />

date<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

document<br />

s scanned<br />

and filed<br />

as per<br />

process<br />

plan<br />

100% of<br />

creditors<br />

paid within<br />

30 days of<br />

invoice<br />

date<br />

(reconcilia<br />

tion 50%<br />

and<br />

payments<br />

50%)<br />

100%<br />

document<br />

s scanned<br />

and filed<br />

as per<br />

process<br />

plan<br />

(electronic<br />

filing 50%,<br />

manual<br />

filing 50%)<br />

Percentage<br />

of creditors<br />

within 30<br />

days of<br />

invoice date<br />

Percentage<br />

documents<br />

scanned<br />

and filed as<br />

per process<br />

plan<br />

100% of<br />

creditors<br />

paid within<br />

30 days of<br />

invoice<br />

date<br />

(reconcilia<br />

tion 50%<br />

and<br />

payments<br />

50%)<br />

100%<br />

document<br />

s scanned<br />

and filed<br />

as per<br />

process<br />

plan<br />

(electronic<br />

filing 50%,<br />

manual<br />

filing 50%)<br />

N/A<br />

N/A<br />

N/A<br />

N/A


355<br />

To ensure<br />

accurate and<br />

complete<br />

reporting of<br />

financial<br />

information<br />

To ensure<br />

sufficient<br />

revenue to<br />

address<br />

development<br />

imperatives<br />

Reconciliatio<br />

n of payroll<br />

and creditors<br />

accounts<br />

balances<br />

Percentage<br />

revenue<br />

collection<br />

from baseline<br />

Financial<br />

reporting<br />

Revenue<br />

Managem<br />

ent (Cost<br />

recovery)<br />

(FV/008/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

expenditure<br />

reconciliation<br />

s performed<br />

on time<br />

Percentage<br />

of consumer<br />

and indigent<br />

data<br />

collected and<br />

cleansed for<br />

5<br />

areas/village<br />

s<br />

36<br />

expenditure<br />

reconciliatio<br />

ns<br />

performed<br />

on a<br />

monthly<br />

basis<br />

100%<br />

consumer,<br />

indigent<br />

data<br />

collected<br />

and<br />

cleansed for<br />

5<br />

areas/villag<br />

es (<br />

magukubjan<br />

e,<br />

naganeng,<br />

Roosenekal<br />

,<br />

tsimanyane,<br />

mapodile)<br />

Number of<br />

expenditur<br />

e<br />

reconciliati<br />

ons<br />

performed<br />

on time<br />

Percentag<br />

e of data<br />

collected<br />

and<br />

cleansed<br />

for five<br />

areas/villa<br />

ges<br />

36<br />

expenditur<br />

e<br />

reconciliati<br />

ons<br />

performed<br />

on a<br />

monthly<br />

basis<br />

100%<br />

consumer,<br />

indigent<br />

data<br />

collected<br />

and<br />

cleansed<br />

for 5<br />

areas/villa<br />

ges (<br />

magukubj<br />

ane,<br />

naganeng,<br />

Roosenek<br />

al,<br />

tsimanyan<br />

e,<br />

mapodile)<br />

Number of<br />

expenditure<br />

reconciliatio<br />

ns<br />

performed<br />

on time<br />

Percentage<br />

of data<br />

collected<br />

and<br />

cleansed for<br />

five<br />

areas/villag<br />

es<br />

36<br />

expenditur<br />

e<br />

reconciliati<br />

ons<br />

performed<br />

on a<br />

monthly<br />

basis<br />

100%<br />

consumer,<br />

indigent<br />

data<br />

collected<br />

and<br />

cleansed<br />

for 5<br />

areas/villa<br />

ges (<br />

magukubj<br />

ane,<br />

naganeng,<br />

Roosenek<br />

al,<br />

tsimanyan<br />

e,<br />

mapodile)<br />

N/A<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R8 477 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R6m<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R7,5m<br />

Total:<br />

R19,5m<br />

N/A


356<br />

Percentage<br />

revenue<br />

collected<br />

40%<br />

revenue<br />

collected(R<br />

15 076 959)<br />

Percentag<br />

e revenue<br />

collection<br />

attained<br />

60%<br />

revenue<br />

collected<br />

Percentage<br />

revenue<br />

collection<br />

attained<br />

63%<br />

revenue<br />

collected<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R3,209,800<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R3,383,780<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R3,561,355<br />

Total:<br />

R10,154,935<br />

To ensure the<br />

optimum,<br />

efficient,<br />

effective<br />

functional<br />

procurement<br />

processes.<br />

Procurement<br />

of goods and<br />

services on<br />

time<br />

Compliance<br />

to Supply<br />

Chain<br />

Management<br />

policies and<br />

regulations.<br />

Demand<br />

Managem<br />

ent<br />

(FV/010/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Acquisitio<br />

n<br />

Managem<br />

ent<br />

(FV/011/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentage<br />

development<br />

of<br />

procurement<br />

plans<br />

Percentage<br />

reduction of<br />

irregular<br />

expenditure<br />

from baseline<br />

100%<br />

developmen<br />

t of<br />

procuremen<br />

t plans<br />

100%<br />

reduction of<br />

irregular<br />

expenditure<br />

from<br />

baseline<br />

(adherence<br />

to full scm<br />

policies and<br />

regulations<br />

100%)<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

developm<br />

ent of<br />

procureme<br />

nt plans<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

reduction<br />

on<br />

irregular<br />

expenditur<br />

e from<br />

baseline<br />

100%<br />

developm<br />

ent of<br />

procureme<br />

nt plans<br />

100%<br />

reduction<br />

of irregular<br />

expenditur<br />

e from<br />

baseline(a<br />

dherence<br />

to full scm<br />

policies<br />

and<br />

regulation<br />

s 100%)<br />

Percentage<br />

developmen<br />

t of<br />

procuremen<br />

t plans<br />

Percentage<br />

reduction<br />

on irregular<br />

expenditure<br />

from<br />

baseline<br />

100%<br />

developm<br />

ent of<br />

procureme<br />

nt plans<br />

100%<br />

reduction<br />

of irregular<br />

expenditur<br />

e from<br />

baseline(a<br />

dherence<br />

to full scm<br />

policies<br />

and<br />

regulation<br />

s 100%)<br />

N/A<br />

N/A<br />

N/A<br />

N/A


357<br />

To ensure<br />

efficient and<br />

effective<br />

contract<br />

management<br />

To ensure<br />

accountability<br />

Drafting and<br />

management<br />

of service<br />

level<br />

agreements<br />

(SLA) for all<br />

services<br />

rendered to<br />

SDM<br />

Monitoring<br />

Contract<br />

Managem<br />

ent<br />

(FV/012/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Complianc<br />

e<br />

managem<br />

ent<br />

(FV/013/2<br />

013-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentage<br />

SLA’s<br />

available and<br />

updated on<br />

the contract<br />

register<br />

Number of<br />

compliance<br />

reports<br />

generated<br />

100%<br />

available<br />

and<br />

updated on<br />

the contract<br />

register<br />

(drafting<br />

and register<br />

updating)<br />

5 reports<br />

(section 71,<br />

section 52,<br />

supply<br />

chain,<br />

CIDB,<br />

section 72,<br />

AFS)<br />

Percentag<br />

e SLA’s<br />

available<br />

and<br />

updated<br />

on the<br />

contract<br />

register<br />

Number of<br />

complianc<br />

e reports<br />

generated<br />

100%<br />

SLA’s<br />

available<br />

and<br />

updated<br />

on the<br />

contract<br />

register<br />

5 reports<br />

(section<br />

71,<br />

section<br />

52, supply<br />

chain,<br />

CIDB,<br />

section<br />

72, AFS)<br />

Percentage<br />

SLA’s<br />

available<br />

and<br />

updated on<br />

the contract<br />

register<br />

Number of<br />

compliance<br />

reports<br />

generated<br />

100%<br />

SLA’s<br />

available<br />

and<br />

updated<br />

on the<br />

contract<br />

register<br />

5 reports<br />

(section<br />

71,<br />

section<br />

52, supply<br />

chain,<br />

CIDB,<br />

section<br />

72, AFS)<br />

N/A<br />

N/A


358<br />

5.6. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

INTERNAL AUDIT WITH OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND BUDGET<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

SDM<br />

Objective<br />

To provide<br />

independent,<br />

objective assurance<br />

and consulting<br />

services<br />

Strategie<br />

s<br />

Planning<br />

the<br />

Audits<br />

Executin<br />

g<br />

Project<br />

Internal<br />

Audits<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

# of<br />

Internal<br />

Audit<br />

Reports<br />

issued<br />

26 # of Internal<br />

Audit<br />

Reports<br />

issued<br />

28 # of Internal<br />

Audit<br />

Reports<br />

issued<br />

30<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:1<br />

000 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:1<br />

051 000<br />

2015/2016:R1<br />

102 499<br />

Reportin<br />

g


359<br />

To assess and<br />

evaluate the<br />

Municipal<br />

performance<br />

information<br />

Follow<br />

Up<br />

Performa<br />

nce<br />

Audits<br />

(GGPP/0<br />

01/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

Performan<br />

ce audit<br />

reports<br />

issued<br />

4 Number of<br />

Performance<br />

audit reports<br />

issued<br />

4 Number of<br />

Performance<br />

audit reports<br />

issued<br />

4<br />

To effectively<br />

control Internal<br />

resources (Human;<br />

Financial; etc.)<br />

Regularit<br />

y audit<br />

(GGPP/0<br />

01/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

regularity<br />

audits<br />

conducted<br />

28 Number of<br />

regularity<br />

audits<br />

conducted<br />

28 Number of<br />

regularity<br />

audits<br />

conducted<br />

28


360<br />

To evaluate and<br />

improve the<br />

effectiveness of ICT<br />

controls<br />

Planning<br />

the<br />

audits<br />

Executio<br />

n<br />

ICT<br />

Audits<br />

(GGPP/0<br />

03/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

ICT audit<br />

reports<br />

issued<br />

4 Number of<br />

ICT audit<br />

reports<br />

issued<br />

4 Number of<br />

ICT audit<br />

reports<br />

issued<br />

4<br />

Reportin<br />

g<br />

Follow<br />

Up<br />

To develop the<br />

three year rolling<br />

Internal Audit Plan<br />

Obtain<br />

risk<br />

register<br />

from Risk<br />

Manage<br />

ment Unit<br />

Develop<br />

the IA<br />

Plan<br />

Submit to<br />

Manage<br />

ment for<br />

Noting<br />

Submit to<br />

AC for<br />

approval<br />

Three<br />

year<br />

rolling<br />

plan<br />

(GGPP/0<br />

04/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentag<br />

e review<br />

of the 3<br />

year and<br />

annual IA<br />

plan<br />

100% Percentage<br />

review of<br />

the 3 year<br />

and annual<br />

IA plan<br />

100% Percentage<br />

review of<br />

the 3 year<br />

and annual<br />

IA plan<br />

100%


361<br />

To perform ad hoc<br />

assignments as<br />

requested by<br />

council and<br />

management<br />

Submit to<br />

Municipal<br />

council<br />

for<br />

Noting<br />

Receive<br />

adhoc<br />

assignme<br />

nt from<br />

manage<br />

ment<br />

Send the<br />

request<br />

to audit<br />

committe<br />

e for<br />

approval<br />

Adhoc<br />

Assignm<br />

ents<br />

(GGPP/0<br />

05/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentag<br />

e ad hoc<br />

reports<br />

issued<br />

100%<br />

of ad<br />

hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

issued<br />

Percentage<br />

ad hoc<br />

reports<br />

issued<br />

100%<br />

of ad<br />

hoc<br />

reports<br />

issued<br />

Percentage<br />

ad hoc<br />

reports<br />

issued<br />

100%<br />

of ad<br />

hoc<br />

reports<br />

issued


362<br />

Conduct<br />

the<br />

assignme<br />

nt and<br />

issue<br />

final<br />

Report to<br />

Manage<br />

ment and<br />

Audit<br />

committe<br />

e<br />

To facilitate<br />

payments of Auditor<br />

General South<br />

Africa<br />

To coordinate the<br />

activities of the<br />

Audit committee<br />

Issue<br />

Notice<br />

and<br />

Agenda<br />

Obtain<br />

items<br />

from<br />

different<br />

departme<br />

nt and<br />

Audit<br />

fees<br />

external<br />

(GGPP/0<br />

06/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Audit<br />

Committ<br />

ee<br />

(GGPP/0<br />

07/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentag<br />

e payment<br />

facilitation<br />

for Auditor<br />

General<br />

SA<br />

%<br />

facilitation<br />

of AC<br />

activities<br />

100%<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

facilita<br />

ted<br />

100%<br />

Facilit<br />

ation<br />

Percentage<br />

payment<br />

facilitation for<br />

Auditor<br />

General SA<br />

% facilitation<br />

of AC<br />

activities<br />

100%<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

facilitat<br />

ed<br />

100%<br />

Facilita<br />

tion<br />

Percentage<br />

payment<br />

facilitation<br />

for Auditor<br />

General SA<br />

% facilitation<br />

of AC<br />

activities<br />

100%<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

facilitat<br />

ed<br />

100%<br />

Facilita<br />

tion<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R3,303,621.56<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R3,472,106.26<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R3,642,<strong>23</strong>9.47<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R500 000.00<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R525 500.00<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R551 250.00<br />

SDM


363<br />

package<br />

them<br />

To procure an<br />

electronic Internal<br />

Audit working paper<br />

system<br />

Issue the<br />

Audit<br />

Packs<br />

Attend<br />

the<br />

meetings<br />

Procure<br />

ment of<br />

working<br />

paper<br />

system<br />

Electroni<br />

c System<br />

(GGPP/0<br />

08/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

%<br />

Procurem<br />

ent of IA<br />

Electronic<br />

System<br />

100% <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R200 000.00<br />

20<strong>14</strong>-2015: R<br />

209 800<br />

2015-2016: 0<br />

SDM<br />

To<br />

foster<br />

intergovernmental<br />

relations<br />

Issue<br />

notice<br />

Prepare<br />

the<br />

documen<br />

t<br />

Attend<br />

the<br />

meetings<br />

IGR<br />

# of IGR<br />

meetings<br />

attended<br />

8 # of IGR<br />

meetings<br />

attended<br />

8 # of IGR<br />

meetings<br />

attended<br />

8 R0<br />

MM’s IGR<br />

SDM


364<br />

To monitor<br />

attendance to AG<br />

matters towards<br />

clean audit<br />

Operatio<br />

n Clean<br />

Audit<br />

(GGPP/0<br />

09/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

Monitoring<br />

to<br />

attendanc<br />

e to AG<br />

matters<br />

100%<br />

monito<br />

ring<br />

Percentage<br />

Monitoring to<br />

attendance<br />

to AG<br />

matters<br />

100%<br />

monito<br />

ring<br />

Percentage<br />

Monitoring to<br />

attendance<br />

to AG<br />

matters<br />

100%<br />

monito<br />

ring<br />

N/A<br />

SDM


365<br />

RISK MANAGEMENT WITH OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND BUDGET<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

Indicator Target Indicato<br />

r<br />

Target Indicator Target<br />

To appraise<br />

the<br />

institution on<br />

risks<br />

By arranging<br />

and<br />

conducting<br />

workshops<br />

and interviews<br />

Risk<br />

Manageme<br />

nt(GGPP/02<br />

0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

strategic,<br />

Operational,<br />

Process risk<br />

assessments<br />

conducted<br />

% of project<br />

risk<br />

assessments<br />

completed<br />

1 strategic<br />

risk, 7<br />

operational<br />

&<br />

processes<br />

assessmen<br />

ts<br />

conducted<br />

100% of<br />

project risk<br />

assessmen<br />

ts<br />

completed<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

strategic,<br />

Operation<br />

al and<br />

Process<br />

risk<br />

assessme<br />

nts<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

% of<br />

project<br />

risk<br />

assessme<br />

nts<br />

complete<br />

d<br />

1<br />

strategic<br />

risk, 7<br />

operation<br />

al &<br />

processes<br />

assessme<br />

nts<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

100% of<br />

project<br />

risk<br />

assessme<br />

nts<br />

complete<br />

d<br />

Number of<br />

strategic ,7<br />

operational<br />

&<br />

processes<br />

assessmen<br />

ts<br />

conducted<br />

% of project<br />

risk<br />

assessmen<br />

ts<br />

completed<br />

1 strategic<br />

risk, 7<br />

operational<br />

&<br />

processes<br />

assessmen<br />

ts<br />

conducted<br />

100% of<br />

project risk<br />

assessmen<br />

ts<br />

completed<br />

N/A<br />

N/A


366<br />

% of<br />

properties<br />

and<br />

operational<br />

sites<br />

surveyed<br />

100% of<br />

properties<br />

and<br />

operational<br />

sites<br />

surveyed<br />

% of<br />

properties<br />

and<br />

operation<br />

al sites<br />

surveyed<br />

100% of<br />

properties<br />

and<br />

operation<br />

al sites<br />

surveyed<br />

% of<br />

properties<br />

and<br />

operational<br />

sites<br />

surveyed<br />

100% of<br />

properties<br />

and<br />

operational<br />

sites<br />

surveyed<br />

To<br />

safeguard<br />

the assets of<br />

SDM<br />

through<br />

alternative<br />

techniques<br />

of risk<br />

transfer<br />

By appraising<br />

the<br />

appropriatenes<br />

s of insurance<br />

contracts,<br />

review the<br />

adequacy of<br />

cover, and<br />

renew policy<br />

Assets<br />

Insurance/I<br />

nsurance<br />

policy<br />

contract<br />

(GGPP/024/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentage<br />

of assets<br />

coverage<br />

100%<br />

coverage of<br />

insurable<br />

assets<br />

Percentag<br />

e of<br />

assets<br />

coverage<br />

100%<br />

coverage<br />

of<br />

insurable<br />

assets<br />

Percentage<br />

of assets<br />

coverage<br />

100%<br />

coverage of<br />

insurable<br />

assets<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R3<br />

000 000,00<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R3<br />

153 000<br />

2015/2016:R3<br />

307 497<br />

SDM<br />

To<br />

safeguard<br />

SDM assets,<br />

its<br />

employees<br />

and visitors<br />

By managing<br />

the operations<br />

of security<br />

services,<br />

review the<br />

allocation of<br />

security at<br />

operational<br />

sites,<br />

Security<br />

Operations<br />

(GGPP/025/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentage<br />

reduction in<br />

security<br />

related<br />

incidents<br />

100%<br />

safeguarde<br />

d assets<br />

and<br />

employees<br />

and visitors<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

reduction<br />

in security<br />

related<br />

incidents<br />

100%<br />

safeguard<br />

ed assets<br />

and<br />

employee<br />

s and<br />

visitors<br />

Percentage<br />

reduction in<br />

security<br />

related<br />

incidents<br />

100%<br />

safeguarde<br />

d assets<br />

and<br />

employees<br />

and visitors<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R1<br />

7 000 000,00<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R1<br />

7 867 000,00<br />

2015/2016:R1<br />

8 742 483<br />

SDM


367<br />

To ascertain<br />

the level of<br />

integrity of<br />

staff and<br />

service<br />

providers<br />

To stem out<br />

fraud and<br />

corruption<br />

activities<br />

By performing<br />

security vetting<br />

on staff and<br />

service<br />

providers<br />

By<br />

implementing<br />

an anticorruption<br />

strategy and<br />

fraud<br />

prevention<br />

plan<br />

Security<br />

Vetting<br />

(GGPP/026/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Anti-fraud<br />

and<br />

corruption<br />

Hotline<br />

(GGPP/028/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentage<br />

implementati<br />

on of vetting<br />

process for<br />

staff and<br />

service<br />

providers<br />

Percentage<br />

implementati<br />

on of antifraud<br />

and<br />

corruption<br />

hotline<br />

100%<br />

implementa<br />

tion of<br />

vetting<br />

process for<br />

staff and<br />

service<br />

providers<br />

100%<br />

implementa<br />

tion of antifraud<br />

and<br />

corruption<br />

hotline<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

vetting<br />

process<br />

for staff<br />

and<br />

service<br />

providers<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

anti-fraud<br />

and<br />

corruption<br />

hotline<br />

100%<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

vetting<br />

process<br />

for staff<br />

and<br />

service<br />

providers<br />

100%<br />

implemen<br />

tation of<br />

anti-fraud<br />

and<br />

corruption<br />

hotline<br />

Percentage<br />

implementa<br />

tion of<br />

vetting<br />

process for<br />

staff and<br />

service<br />

providers<br />

Percentage<br />

implementa<br />

tion of antifraud<br />

and<br />

corruption<br />

hotline<br />

100%<br />

implementa<br />

tion of<br />

vetting<br />

process for<br />

staff and<br />

service<br />

providers<br />

100%<br />

implementa<br />

tion of antifraud<br />

and<br />

corruption<br />

hotline<br />

R0<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:R8<br />

0 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:R8<br />

4080<br />

2015/2016:R8<br />

8 200<br />

Internal<br />

SDM<br />

To secure<br />

business<br />

sustainability<br />

(SDM)<br />

By developing<br />

business<br />

continuity<br />

management<br />

plan<br />

Business<br />

Continuity<br />

management<br />

(GGPP/029/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percentage<br />

development<br />

of business<br />

continuity<br />

management<br />

plan<br />

100%<br />

developed<br />

business<br />

continuity<br />

manageme<br />

nt plan<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

developm<br />

ent of<br />

business<br />

continuity<br />

managem<br />

ent plan<br />

100%<br />

develope<br />

d<br />

business<br />

continuity<br />

managem<br />

ent plan<br />

Percentage<br />

developme<br />

nt of<br />

business<br />

continuity<br />

manageme<br />

nt plan<br />

100%<br />

developed<br />

business<br />

continuity<br />

manageme<br />

nt plan<br />

R0<br />

SDM


368<br />

To raise risk<br />

management<br />

awareness<br />

amongst<br />

staff and<br />

councillors<br />

By providing<br />

training to<br />

staff and<br />

councillors<br />

Risk<br />

Management<br />

awareness<br />

training<br />

(GGPP/030/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives for<br />

risk<br />

awareness<br />

conducted<br />

2 initiatives<br />

for risk<br />

awareness<br />

conducted<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

for risk<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

2<br />

initiatives<br />

for risk<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

for risk<br />

awareness<br />

conducted<br />

2 initiatives<br />

for risk<br />

awareness<br />

conducted<br />

R0<br />

SDM<br />

To<br />

coordinate<br />

and report<br />

on the risk<br />

management<br />

activities<br />

To foster<br />

intergovernm<br />

ental<br />

relations on<br />

all matters of<br />

mutual<br />

interests<br />

To manage<br />

claim<br />

incidents<br />

that demand<br />

excess<br />

By compilation<br />

of quarterly<br />

risk<br />

management<br />

and<br />

compliance<br />

reports<br />

By<br />

strengthening<br />

the<br />

cooperation of<br />

governance<br />

By constant<br />

validation of<br />

submitted<br />

claims<br />

Risk<br />

Management<br />

reporting<br />

(GGPP/031/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

MM’s office<br />

Inter<br />

Government<br />

al Relations<br />

(IGR)<br />

Excess on<br />

insurance<br />

(GGPP/032/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

risk<br />

management<br />

reports<br />

generated<br />

# of district<br />

and<br />

provincial<br />

IGR<br />

meetings<br />

Percentage<br />

insurance<br />

excess<br />

processed<br />

4 risk<br />

manageme<br />

nt reports<br />

generated<br />

4 district<br />

and 4<br />

provincial<br />

meetings<br />

100%<br />

insurance<br />

excess<br />

processed<br />

Number<br />

of risk<br />

managem<br />

ent<br />

reports<br />

generated<br />

# of<br />

district<br />

and<br />

provincial<br />

IGR<br />

meetings<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

insurance<br />

excess<br />

processe<br />

d<br />

4 risk<br />

managem<br />

ent<br />

reports<br />

generated<br />

4 district<br />

and 4<br />

provincial<br />

meetings<br />

100%<br />

insurance<br />

excess<br />

processe<br />

d<br />

Number of<br />

risk<br />

manageme<br />

nt reports<br />

generated<br />

# of district<br />

and<br />

provincial<br />

IGR<br />

meetings<br />

Percentage<br />

insurance<br />

excess<br />

processed<br />

4 risk<br />

manageme<br />

nt reports<br />

generated<br />

4 district<br />

and 4<br />

provincial<br />

meetings<br />

100%<br />

insurance<br />

excess<br />

processed<br />

R0<br />

SDM<br />

R100,000 SDM<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R500,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

R525,500<br />

2015/2016<br />

R551,249.50<br />

SDM


369<br />

OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR INDICATORS AND TARGETS <strong>IDP</strong>/BUDGET <strong>2013</strong>-2016 MTREF<br />

Objective<br />

To<br />

integrate<br />

youth in<br />

the socioeconomic<br />

mainstrea<br />

m<br />

Strategie<br />

s<br />

Drive<br />

youth<br />

developm<br />

ent<br />

through<br />

capacity<br />

building<br />

and<br />

implement<br />

ation of<br />

integrated<br />

youth<br />

month<br />

program<br />

Facilitate<br />

integration<br />

and<br />

alignment<br />

of district<br />

Project<br />

Youth<br />

Developmen<br />

t<br />

(GGPP/033/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Indicato Target Indicato Target Indicato<br />

r<br />

r<br />

r<br />

Number<br />

of youth<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

3 Number<br />

of youth<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

3 Number<br />

of youth<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Target<br />

3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R 300 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/215 R<br />

315 300<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R330 750<br />

Fundi<br />

ng<br />

Sour<br />

ce<br />

SDM<br />

and<br />

Privat<br />

e<br />

Fundi<br />

ng


370<br />

To provide<br />

support<br />

and<br />

advocacy<br />

on<br />

children’s<br />

rights and<br />

their<br />

welfare<br />

initiatives<br />

with<br />

NYDA<br />

Establish<br />

ment of<br />

project<br />

steering<br />

committee<br />

Monitoring<br />

and<br />

evaluation<br />

of<br />

implement<br />

ation<br />

Ensure<br />

provision<br />

of<br />

comprehe<br />

nsive<br />

support to<br />

children<br />

centres<br />

and their<br />

programm<br />

es<br />

Develop<br />

participato<br />

ry<br />

mechanis<br />

m on<br />

national<br />

and<br />

Children<br />

developmen<br />

t<br />

(GGPP/034/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

children’<br />

s<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

2 children<br />

initiatives<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

children’<br />

s<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

2 children<br />

initiatives<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

children’<br />

s<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

2 children<br />

initiatives<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R 150 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/215<br />

R157 650<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R165 375<br />

SDM


371<br />

Ensure<br />

adequate<br />

caring and<br />

protection<br />

of the<br />

elderly<br />

To<br />

implement<br />

programs<br />

for people<br />

living with<br />

disabilities<br />

To provide<br />

support<br />

and<br />

advocacy<br />

on women<br />

and gender<br />

provincial<br />

children<br />

program<br />

Facilitate<br />

participati<br />

on and<br />

integration<br />

of elderly<br />

people in<br />

society in<br />

governme<br />

nt<br />

programm<br />

es<br />

Facilitate<br />

integration<br />

of people<br />

with<br />

disability<br />

in the<br />

mainstrea<br />

m society<br />

though<br />

targeted<br />

programm<br />

es<br />

Initiate<br />

and<br />

implement<br />

women<br />

focal<br />

month<br />

Aged<br />

advocacy<br />

programme<br />

(GGPP/035/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Programme<br />

for people<br />

living with<br />

disabilities<br />

(GGPP/036/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Women and<br />

Gender<br />

programmes<br />

(GGPP/037/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

No of<br />

aged<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s for<br />

people<br />

living<br />

with<br />

disabiliti<br />

es<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en for<br />

3 (2 mandela<br />

days, one<br />

international<br />

older persons<br />

day)<br />

4 (1 eye care,<br />

2 deaf<br />

awarenes, 3<br />

disability, 4<br />

mental/braile<br />

and<br />

awareness)<br />

3 (1 women’s<br />

month launch,<br />

2 fun walks, 3<br />

international<br />

woman’s day)<br />

No of<br />

aged<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s for<br />

people<br />

living<br />

with<br />

disabiliti<br />

es<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en for<br />

3 (2 mandela<br />

days, one<br />

international<br />

older persons<br />

day)<br />

4 (1 eye care,<br />

2 deaf<br />

awarenes, 3<br />

disability, 4<br />

mental/braile<br />

and<br />

awareness)<br />

3 (1 women’s<br />

month launch,<br />

2 fun walks, 3<br />

international<br />

woman’s day)<br />

No of<br />

aged<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s for<br />

people<br />

living<br />

with<br />

disabiliti<br />

es<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

undertak<br />

en for<br />

3 (2 mandela<br />

days, one<br />

international<br />

older persons<br />

day)<br />

4 (1 eye care,<br />

2 deaf<br />

awarenes, 3<br />

disability, 4<br />

mental/braile<br />

and<br />

awareness)<br />

3 (1 women’s<br />

month launch,<br />

2 fun walks, 3<br />

international<br />

woman’s day)<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R 250 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/215 R<br />

R262 750<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R 275 625<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R200 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/215 R<br />

210 200<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R220 500<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R 300 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

R 315 300<br />

2015/2016<br />

R 330 750<br />

SDM<br />

SDM<br />

SDM


372<br />

developme<br />

nt<br />

programm<br />

es<br />

To forge<br />

strong and<br />

sustainable<br />

civil society<br />

partnership<br />

on<br />

constitution<br />

al values<br />

To provide<br />

partnership<br />

and<br />

programm<br />

e<br />

Intensity<br />

awarenes<br />

s<br />

campaign<br />

s on<br />

eradicatio<br />

n of<br />

gender<br />

based<br />

violence<br />

Strengthe<br />

n social<br />

cohesion<br />

through<br />

culture,<br />

religion<br />

and<br />

tradition<br />

Mobilise<br />

civil<br />

society to<br />

adhere<br />

and<br />

observe<br />

charter of<br />

positive<br />

values<br />

Implement<br />

uniform<br />

integrated<br />

Moral<br />

Regeneratio<br />

n movement<br />

(MRM)<br />

(GGPP/038/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Executive<br />

support<br />

Traditional<br />

women<br />

and<br />

gender<br />

develop<br />

ment<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

revival of<br />

MRM<br />

committ<br />

ee<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

support<br />

100% revival<br />

of MRM<br />

committee<br />

(revival 50%,<br />

policy 25%,<br />

program 25%)<br />

100%<br />

support(1<br />

traditional<br />

women<br />

and<br />

gender<br />

develop<br />

ment<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

revival of<br />

MRM<br />

committ<br />

ee<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

support<br />

100% revival<br />

of MRM<br />

committee<br />

100%<br />

support(1<br />

traditional<br />

women<br />

and<br />

gender<br />

develop<br />

ment<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

revival of<br />

MRM<br />

committ<br />

ee<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

support<br />

100% revival<br />

of MRM<br />

committee<br />

100%<br />

support(1<br />

traditional<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R 50 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

R 52 550<br />

2015/2016<br />

R 55 125<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R 500 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

SDM<br />

SDM


373<br />

support to<br />

Magoshi<br />

To ensure<br />

improved<br />

communic<br />

ations with<br />

internal<br />

and<br />

external<br />

stakeholde<br />

rs<br />

To ensure<br />

integrated<br />

marketing<br />

support to<br />

traditional<br />

leaders<br />

Provide<br />

regular<br />

newsletter<br />

services<br />

Stage<br />

high<br />

quality<br />

events<br />

Support to<br />

communit<br />

y media<br />

Provide<br />

marketing<br />

platforms<br />

leadership;<br />

Mayoral<br />

committee;<br />

Support to<br />

families<br />

(GGPP/039/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Communicat<br />

ions and<br />

Media<br />

relations<br />

on stake<br />

holder<br />

engagement<br />

(GGPP/040/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Communicat<br />

ions and<br />

Media<br />

relations<br />

on<br />

Newsletter<br />

(GGPP/040/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Marketing<br />

and<br />

Branding<br />

to<br />

tradition<br />

al<br />

leadersh<br />

ip,<br />

Mayoral<br />

committ<br />

ee;<br />

Support<br />

to<br />

families<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s for<br />

stakehol<br />

der<br />

engage<br />

ment<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

newslett<br />

ers<br />

issued<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

initiative<br />

leaders, 2<br />

mayoral<br />

committees, 3<br />

vulnerable<br />

families)<br />

Eight (8)<br />

stakeholder<br />

engagements<br />

8 newsletters<br />

(1)4 internal,<br />

(2)4 external<br />

100%<br />

initiatives for<br />

marketing and<br />

to<br />

tradition<br />

al<br />

leadersh<br />

ip,<br />

Mayoral<br />

committ<br />

ee;<br />

Support<br />

to<br />

families<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s for<br />

stakehol<br />

der<br />

engage<br />

ment<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

newslett<br />

ers<br />

issued<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

initiative<br />

leaders, 2<br />

mayoral<br />

committees, 3<br />

vulnerable<br />

families)<br />

Eight (8)<br />

stakeholder<br />

engagements<br />

8 newsletters<br />

(1)4 internal,<br />

(2)4 external<br />

100%<br />

initiatives for<br />

marketing and<br />

to<br />

tradition<br />

al<br />

leadersh<br />

ip,<br />

Mayoral<br />

committ<br />

ee;<br />

Support<br />

to<br />

families<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s for<br />

stakehol<br />

der<br />

engage<br />

ment<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

newslett<br />

ers<br />

issued<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

initiative<br />

leaders, 2<br />

mayoral<br />

committees, 3<br />

vulnerable<br />

families)<br />

Eight (8)<br />

stakeholder<br />

engagements<br />

8 newsletters<br />

(1)4 internal,<br />

(2)4 external<br />

100%<br />

initiatives for<br />

marketing and<br />

R 525 500<br />

2015/2016<br />

R 551 250<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R 3,<br />

220,272<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

R<br />

3,808,006<br />

2015/2016<br />

R<br />

3,896,598<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R 437 342<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

SDM<br />

SDM


374<br />

of the<br />

district<br />

Provide<br />

strategic<br />

support to<br />

Executive<br />

Mayor ,<br />

enhance<br />

social<br />

cohesion<br />

and nation<br />

building<br />

To conduct<br />

a study on<br />

customer<br />

satisfaction<br />

for the<br />

district<br />

and its<br />

products<br />

Ensure<br />

branding<br />

in all<br />

activities<br />

Ensure<br />

preservati<br />

on of<br />

heritage<br />

Contribute<br />

in<br />

liberation<br />

struggle<br />

heritage<br />

Promote<br />

IGR<br />

Engage<br />

customers<br />

(GGPP/041/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Strategic<br />

Events<br />

(GGPP/042/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Customer<br />

satisfaction<br />

(GGPP/043/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

s for<br />

marketin<br />

g and<br />

branding<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s for<br />

strategic<br />

events<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

custome<br />

r<br />

satisfacti<br />

on<br />

survey<br />

branding (1.<br />

Buildings 25%,<br />

2.events50%,<br />

3.<br />

Promotionals<br />

25%<br />

3 - (1<br />

heritage,2.Exc<br />

ellence<br />

awards, 3.Golf<br />

day<br />

100%<br />

customer<br />

satisfaction<br />

survey(ToR,<br />

Procurement,<br />

report)<br />

s for<br />

marketin<br />

g and<br />

branding<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s for<br />

strategic<br />

events<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

custome<br />

r<br />

satisfacti<br />

on<br />

survey<br />

branding (1.<br />

Buildings 25%,<br />

2.events50%,<br />

3.<br />

Promotionals<br />

25%<br />

3 - (1<br />

heritage,2.Exc<br />

ellence<br />

awards, 3.Golf<br />

day<br />

100%<br />

customer<br />

satisfaction<br />

survey(ToR,<br />

Procurement,<br />

report)<br />

s for<br />

marketin<br />

g and<br />

branding<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiative<br />

s for<br />

strategic<br />

events<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

custome<br />

r<br />

satisfacti<br />

on<br />

survey<br />

branding (1.<br />

Buildings 25%,<br />

2.events50%,<br />

3.<br />

Promotionals<br />

25%<br />

3 - (1<br />

heritage,2.Exc<br />

ellence<br />

awards, 3.Golf<br />

day)<br />

100%<br />

customer<br />

satisfaction<br />

survey(ToR,<br />

Procurement,<br />

report)<br />

R 459 647<br />

2015/2016<br />

R 482 169<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

R 1 200<br />

000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

R 1 261<br />

200<br />

2015/2016<br />

R 1 322<br />

999<br />

R50 000


375<br />

To comply<br />

with<br />

service<br />

standards<br />

Proritise<br />

people’s<br />

needs for<br />

service<br />

delivery<br />

Batho pele<br />

event<br />

(GGPP/044/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number<br />

of batho<br />

pele<br />

initiative<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

1 batho pele<br />

event<br />

Number<br />

of batho<br />

pele<br />

initiative<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

1 batho pele<br />

event<br />

Number<br />

of batho<br />

pele<br />

initiative<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

1 batho pele<br />

event<br />

R50 000<br />

To foster<br />

internation<br />

al relations<br />

Engage<br />

internation<br />

al peers<br />

International<br />

relations<br />

(GGPP/045/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

internati<br />

onal<br />

relations<br />

fostered<br />

100%<br />

international<br />

relations as<br />

per political<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

internati<br />

onal<br />

relations<br />

fostered<br />

100%<br />

international<br />

relations<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

internati<br />

onal<br />

relations<br />

fostered<br />

100%<br />

international<br />

relations<br />

R50 000


376<br />

OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER INDICATORS AND TARGETS <strong>IDP</strong>/BUDGET <strong>2013</strong>-2016 MTREF<br />

SECRETARIAT<br />

Objective<br />

To<br />

maximise<br />

accountabili<br />

ty<br />

Strategies<br />

Oversight<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Project Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Oversight Percentage<br />

Percentage<br />

Percentage<br />

visits initiatives<br />

initiatives<br />

initiatives<br />

(GGPP/04 employed<br />

employed to<br />

employed to<br />

6/<strong>2013</strong>- to support<br />

support<br />

support<br />

20<strong>14</strong>) oversight<br />

oversight<br />

oversight<br />

visits/opera<br />

visits/operations<br />

visits/operation<br />

tions<br />

s<br />

100%<br />

initiatives<br />

employed to<br />

support<br />

oversight<br />

visits/operati<br />

ons (1<br />

previsits/Res<br />

earch 25% 2.<br />

Research<br />

report 25%<br />

3.admin<br />

support 25%<br />

4.exit report<br />

25%).<br />

100%<br />

initiatives<br />

employed<br />

to support<br />

oversight<br />

visits/opera<br />

tions<br />

(1<br />

previsits/Re<br />

search 25%<br />

2.<br />

Research<br />

report 25%<br />

3.admin<br />

support<br />

25% 4.exit<br />

report<br />

25%).<br />

100% initiatives<br />

employed to<br />

support<br />

oversight<br />

visits/operations<br />

(1<br />

previsits/Resear<br />

ch 25% 2.<br />

Research report<br />

25% 3.admin<br />

support 25%<br />

4.exit report<br />

25%).<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R500 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R525 500<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R551 250<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

SDM


377<br />

# of<br />

oversight<br />

reports<br />

produced<br />

10 oversight<br />

reports<br />

# of oversight<br />

reports<br />

produced<br />

10<br />

oversight<br />

reports<br />

# of oversight<br />

reports<br />

produced<br />

10 oversight<br />

reports<br />

To<br />

rationalise<br />

Council<br />

activities<br />

To<br />

maximise<br />

compliance<br />

and<br />

uniformity<br />

To<br />

effectively<br />

control<br />

internal<br />

resources<br />

(Human;<br />

Financial;<br />

etc)<br />

Policy<br />

assessmen<br />

t<br />

Internal<br />

control<br />

Implementa<br />

tion of<br />

Council<br />

Activities<br />

Calendar<br />

(GGPP/04<br />

7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Policy<br />

developme<br />

nt and or<br />

review<br />

(GGPP/04<br />

8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Internal<br />

Control<br />

measures<br />

%<br />

compilation<br />

of Council<br />

Activities<br />

Calendar<br />

Number of<br />

policies<br />

reviewed<br />

Number of<br />

reports on<br />

on-going<br />

oversight of<br />

programme<br />

s and<br />

projects<br />

provided to<br />

the Chief<br />

100%<br />

Council<br />

Activities<br />

Calendar<br />

Compilation<br />

5 policies<br />

(public<br />

participation,<br />

petition, ward<br />

committee<br />

incentives,<br />

district ward<br />

committees<br />

forum, district<br />

MPAC)<br />

% compilation of<br />

Council<br />

Activities<br />

Calendar<br />

Number of<br />

policies<br />

reviewed<br />

4 Number of<br />

reports on ongoing<br />

oversight<br />

of programmes<br />

and projects<br />

provided to the<br />

Chief<br />

Operations<br />

Officer w.r.t<br />

100%<br />

Council<br />

Activities<br />

Calendar<br />

Compilation<br />

3 policies<br />

developed<br />

and or<br />

reviewed<br />

% compilation<br />

of Council<br />

Activities<br />

Calendar<br />

Number of<br />

policies<br />

reviewed<br />

4 Number of<br />

reports on ongoing<br />

oversight of<br />

programmes<br />

and projects<br />

provided to the<br />

Chief<br />

Operations<br />

100% Council<br />

Activities<br />

Calendar<br />

Compilation<br />

3 policies<br />

developed and<br />

or reviewed<br />

R0<br />

N/A<br />

N/A<br />

4 N/A N/A


378<br />

To attain<br />

Clean Audit<br />

by ensuring<br />

compliance<br />

to all<br />

government<br />

and<br />

reporting<br />

requiremen<br />

ts<br />

To<br />

effectively<br />

encourage<br />

a Risk free<br />

working<br />

environmen<br />

t<br />

Operation<br />

Clean Audit<br />

Risk<br />

Manageme<br />

nt<br />

Internal<br />

Audit<br />

reports<br />

(GGPP/01<br />

8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Risk<br />

Manageme<br />

nt Reports<br />

(GGPP/02<br />

0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Operations<br />

Officer w.r.t<br />

Department<br />

Austerity<br />

Measurers;<br />

Overtime;<br />

Leave;<br />

Travelling<br />

Allowances<br />

Internal<br />

Audit<br />

reports<br />

Disclaimer<br />

Risk<br />

Manageme<br />

nt Reports<br />

100% AG<br />

issues<br />

resolved.<br />

Unqualified<br />

Audit Opinion<br />

100% Risk<br />

Issues<br />

resolved<br />

Department<br />

Austerity<br />

Measurers;<br />

Overtime;<br />

Leave;<br />

Travelling<br />

Allowances<br />

Internal Audit<br />

reports<br />

Disclaimer<br />

Risk<br />

Management<br />

Reports<br />

100% AG<br />

issues<br />

resolved.<br />

Unqualified<br />

Audit<br />

Opinion<br />

100% Risk<br />

Issues<br />

resolved<br />

Officer w.r.t<br />

Department<br />

Austerity<br />

Measurers;<br />

Overtime;<br />

Leave;<br />

Travelling<br />

Allowances<br />

Internal Audit<br />

reports<br />

Disclaimer<br />

Risk<br />

Management<br />

Reports<br />

100% AG issues<br />

resolved.<br />

Unqualified<br />

Audit Opinion<br />

100% Risk<br />

Issues resolved<br />

N/A<br />

N/A<br />

N/A<br />

N/A<br />

Customer<br />

satisfaction<br />

survey<br />

(GGPP/04<br />

3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Batho pele<br />

(GGPP/04<br />

R50 000<br />

R50 000<br />

SDM<br />

SDM


379<br />

4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Internationa<br />

l relations<br />

(GGPP/04<br />

5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

R50 000<br />

SDM<br />

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

Objective<br />

To<br />

maximise<br />

accountabili<br />

ty<br />

Strategies<br />

Host<br />

Speakers<br />

outreach<br />

activities<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Project Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Council<br />

Two (2)<br />

Two (2)<br />

outreaches<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

employed<br />

to support<br />

council<br />

outreaches<br />

Two (2)<br />

(draft annual<br />

report, draft<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

employed<br />

to support<br />

council<br />

outreaches<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

employed<br />

to support<br />

council<br />

outreache<br />

s<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R395 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R415 <strong>14</strong>5<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R435 487<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

Source<br />

SDM


380<br />

Ward<br />

committees<br />

service<br />

delivery<br />

engagemen<br />

ts<br />

(GGPP/05<br />

0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

engagemen<br />

ts held<br />

2<br />

engagement<br />

s held<br />

Number of<br />

engagemen<br />

ts held<br />

2<br />

engagement<br />

s held<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

meetings<br />

held<br />

2 engagements<br />

held<br />

R300 000<br />

IGR (Chief<br />

whip &<br />

Speaker)<br />

Public<br />

participatio<br />

n<br />

Number of<br />

activities<br />

held<br />

4 meetings<br />

held<br />

Number of<br />

activities<br />

held<br />

4 meetings<br />

held<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

activities<br />

held<br />

4 meetings held<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R10,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R10,510<br />

SDM<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R11,024<br />

To restore<br />

nation<br />

identity<br />

Geographic<br />

Names<br />

Change<br />

Public<br />

participatio<br />

n on<br />

Geographic<br />

Names<br />

Change<br />

(GGPP/05<br />

5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

inititatives<br />

employed<br />

to<br />

coordinate<br />

geographic<br />

name<br />

change<br />

process<br />

Two (2)<br />

initiatives<br />

1.Renaming<br />

of burgesfort<br />

town<br />

2.Naming of<br />

DeHoop<br />

Dam<br />

Number of<br />

inititatives<br />

employed<br />

to<br />

coordinate<br />

geographic<br />

name<br />

change<br />

process<br />

Two (2)<br />

initiatives<br />

1.Renaming<br />

of burgesfort<br />

town<br />

2.Naming of<br />

DeHoop<br />

Dam<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

inititatives<br />

employed<br />

to<br />

coordinat<br />

e<br />

geographi<br />

c name<br />

change<br />

process<br />

Two (2)<br />

initiatives<br />

1.Renaming of<br />

burgesfort town<br />

2.Naming of<br />

DeHoop Dam<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R130,800<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R137,470.8<br />

0<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R<strong>14</strong>4,206.8<br />

7<br />

SDM<br />

Budget<br />

speech<br />

Percentage<br />

facilitation<br />

for budget<br />

100%<br />

(stakeholder<br />

mobilisation<br />

Percentage<br />

facilitation<br />

for budget<br />

100%<br />

(stakeholder<br />

mobilisation<br />

Percentag<br />

e<br />

facilitation<br />

100%<br />

(stakeholder<br />

mobilisation<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R350,000


381<br />

(GGPP/05<br />

1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

speech<br />

event<br />

50%,<br />

logistical<br />

preparations<br />

50%)<br />

speech<br />

event<br />

50%,<br />

logistical<br />

preparations<br />

50%)<br />

for budget<br />

speech<br />

event<br />

50%, logistical<br />

preparations50<br />

%)<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R367,850<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R385,874<br />

Declaration<br />

of<br />

Councillors<br />

interests<br />

(GGPP/05<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Number of<br />

councillors’<br />

declaration<br />

s<br />

processed<br />

49<br />

councillors<br />

declaration<br />

forms<br />

processed<br />

Number of<br />

councillors’<br />

declaration<br />

s<br />

processed<br />

49<br />

councillors<br />

declaration<br />

forms<br />

processed<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

councillor<br />

s’<br />

declaratio<br />

ns<br />

processe<br />

d<br />

49 councillors<br />

declaration<br />

forms processed<br />

R0<br />

COUNCILLOR’S WELFARE<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To provide Attend to Councillor<br />

conducive councillor Welfare<br />

environment queries (GGPP/053/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

for<br />

Facilitate<br />

councillor workshop<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

functioning<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

employed<br />

for<br />

councillors<br />

welfare<br />

1<br />

(Income<br />

Tax Act)<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

employed<br />

for<br />

councillors<br />

welfare<br />

1(Income<br />

Tax Act)<br />

Number of<br />

initiatives<br />

employed<br />

for<br />

councillors<br />

welfare<br />

1(Income<br />

Tax Act)<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

R0<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

SDM


382<br />

CAPACITY BUILDING<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Funding<br />

Source<br />

Objective Strategies Project<br />

To provide Facilitate<br />

ammunition training for<br />

for Section 79<br />

councillors committees<br />

operations<br />

Facilitate<br />

horizontal<br />

learning<br />

Training of<br />

councillors<br />

(GGPP/054/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Target Indicator Target<br />

Number of<br />

councillors<br />

trained<br />

49<br />

councillors<br />

Number of<br />

councillors<br />

trained<br />

49<br />

councillors<br />

Number of<br />

councillors<br />

trained<br />

49<br />

councillors<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R350,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>-<br />

2015:<br />

R367 850<br />

SDM<br />

2015-<br />

2016:<br />

R385 875


383<br />

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND <strong>IDP</strong> WITH OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES AND BUDGET<br />

Indicators and Targets<br />

MTERF<br />

Budget<br />

Estimate<br />

Fundin<br />

g<br />

Source<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2<br />

Objective<br />

Strategies<br />

Project<br />

Indicator Target Indicator Indicator Target Indicat<br />

or<br />

To ensure<br />

institutional<br />

performance culture<br />

Implement<br />

the PMS<br />

Framework<br />

PMS<br />

Framework<br />

(GGPP/056/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Agreements<br />

/commitmen<br />

ts<br />

(GGPP/057/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

<strong>Review</strong>/App<br />

raisals<br />

(GGPP/058/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Percenta<br />

ge review<br />

of PMS<br />

Framewo<br />

rk<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

commitm<br />

ents<br />

conclude<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

reviews<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

100%<br />

review of<br />

PMS<br />

framewor<br />

k<br />

100%<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

commitm<br />

ents<br />

conclude<br />

d<br />

2<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

reviews<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

Percenta<br />

ge review<br />

of PMS<br />

Framewo<br />

rk<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

commitm<br />

ents<br />

conclude<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

reviews<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

100%<br />

review of<br />

PMS<br />

framewor<br />

k<br />

100%<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

commitm<br />

ents<br />

conclude<br />

d<br />

2<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

reviews<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

Percentage<br />

review of PMS<br />

Framework<br />

Percentage<br />

performance<br />

commitments<br />

concluded<br />

Number of<br />

performance<br />

reviews<br />

conducted<br />

100%<br />

review<br />

of PMS<br />

framew<br />

ork<br />

100%<br />

perform<br />

ance<br />

commit<br />

ments<br />

conclud<br />

ed<br />

2<br />

perform<br />

ance<br />

reviews<br />

conduct<br />

ed<br />

Institutional Percenta 100% Percenta 100% Percentage 100%<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R200,000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:<br />

R210,200<br />

2015/2016:R22<br />

0 500<br />

SDM


384<br />

To ensure integrated<br />

development<br />

planning<br />

Fulfil the<br />

adopted <strong>IDP</strong><br />

process plan<br />

SDBIP<br />

(GGPP/059/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Department<br />

al SDBIP<br />

(GGPP/060/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Annual<br />

report<br />

(GGPP/061/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

Compliance<br />

reporting<br />

(GGPP/062/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

Framework/<br />

process<br />

ge<br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

institution<br />

al SDBIP<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

develop<br />

mental<br />

SDBIP<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

compilati<br />

on of<br />

annual<br />

report<br />

2012/201<br />

3<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

complian<br />

ce<br />

reports<br />

submitte<br />

d<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

compilati<br />

developm<br />

ent of<br />

institution<br />

al SDBIP<br />

100%<br />

developm<br />

ent of<br />

departme<br />

ntal<br />

SDBIP<br />

100%<br />

compilati<br />

on of<br />

annual<br />

report<br />

2012/201<br />

3<br />

8<br />

complian<br />

ce<br />

reports<br />

submitted<br />

(MTAS,<br />

LGTAS)<br />

100%<br />

compilati<br />

on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />

ge<br />

developm<br />

ent of<br />

institution<br />

al SDBIP<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

developm<br />

ent of<br />

developm<br />

ental<br />

SDBIP<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

compilati<br />

on of<br />

annual<br />

report<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

3<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

complian<br />

ce<br />

reports<br />

submitted<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

compilati<br />

developm<br />

ent of<br />

institution<br />

al SDBIP<br />

100%<br />

developm<br />

ent of<br />

departme<br />

ntal<br />

SDBIP<br />

100%<br />

compilati<br />

on of<br />

annual<br />

report<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

8<br />

complian<br />

ce<br />

reports<br />

submitted<br />

(MTAS,<br />

LGTAS)<br />

100%<br />

compilati<br />

on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />

development of<br />

institutional<br />

SDBIP<br />

Percentage<br />

development of<br />

developmental<br />

SDBIP<br />

Percentage<br />

compilation of<br />

annual report<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

Number of<br />

compliance<br />

reports<br />

submitted<br />

Percentage<br />

compilation of<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

instituti<br />

onal<br />

SDBIP<br />

100%<br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

depart<br />

mental<br />

SDBIP<br />

100%<br />

compila<br />

tion of<br />

annual<br />

report<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2<br />

015<br />

8<br />

complia<br />

nce<br />

reports<br />

submitt<br />

ed<br />

(MTAS,<br />

LGTAS<br />

)<br />

100%<br />

compila<br />

tion of<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>:<br />

R800 000<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015:


385<br />

plan<br />

(GGPP/063<br />

and<br />

064/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> review<br />

(GGPP/065/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong>)<br />

on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />

framewor<br />

k/process<br />

plan<br />

Percenta<br />

ge review<br />

of <strong>IDP</strong><br />

framewor<br />

k/process<br />

plan<br />

100%<br />

review of<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />

framewor<br />

k/process<br />

plan<br />

Percenta<br />

ge review<br />

of <strong>IDP</strong><br />

framewor<br />

k/process<br />

plan<br />

100%<br />

review of<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

framework/proc<br />

ess plan<br />

Percentage<br />

review of <strong>IDP</strong><br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

framew<br />

ork/pro<br />

cess<br />

plan<br />

100%<br />

review<br />

of <strong>IDP</strong><br />

R840 800<br />

2015/2016:<br />

R881 999


386<br />

5.7. PROVINCIAL AND<br />

NATIONAL AGENCIES AND<br />

DEPARTMENTS


387<br />

1. CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE, HUMAN SETTLEMENTS AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS<br />

(COGHSTA)<br />

DEVELOPMENT AREAS <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> FINANCIAL YEAR<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY Project Duration Total<br />

expenditure<br />

MTEF Estimates<br />

2012-13 <strong>2013</strong>-<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>-<br />

15<br />

<strong>2013</strong> /<br />

WARD VILLAGE SUBSIDY Beneficiaries/<br />

R'000 R'001<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(AREA) PROGRAMME Houses<br />

None<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />

MAKHUDUTHAMAGA MUNICIPALITY<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> WARDS AREAS SUBSIDY Beneficiaries/<br />

Houses<br />

Current<br />

Status<br />

8 cabrieve Rural 59 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

31 Vlaakplass Rural 72 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

8 Uitkyk/Mochadi Rural 128 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

30 Serareng Rural 68 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

30 Masanteng Rural 66 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

29 Mmakgwabe Rural 40 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

7 Dikanton Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project


388<br />

31 Makhutso Rural 35 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

TOTAL 500 None<br />

DEVELOPMENT AREAS <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> FINANCIAL YEAR<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROJECT DURATION TOTAL<br />

EXPENDI<br />

TURE<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> WARD VILLAGE<br />

(AREA)<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />

ELIAS MOTSOALEDI MUNICIPALITY<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

SUBSI<br />

DY<br />

PROG<br />

RAMM<br />

E<br />

WARDS AREAS SUBSI<br />

DY<br />

BENEFICIAR<br />

IES/HOUSES<br />

BENEFICIAR<br />

IES/HOUSES<br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

NONE<br />

MTEF ESTIMATES CURRENT<br />

STATUS<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>-15<br />

8 Elandsdoorn Rural 60 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

“A”<br />

Elandsdoorn Rural 60 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

“B”<br />

Uitspanning Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

“A”<br />

Sempupuru Rural 0 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

9 Tambo Rural 0 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Elandsdoorn<br />

“E”<br />

Rural 0 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project


389<br />

TOTA<br />

L<br />

Phooko D3 Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Phooko Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Part of Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Ngolovane<br />

10 Ntwane Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Dithabaneng Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

11 Elandsdoorn Rural 0 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

T/S<br />

Phooko Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

(small)<br />

Jabulani Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Part of 5 Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Morgan<br />

Taiwan & Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Molala<br />

Naganeng Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

<strong>14</strong> Matlalalehwele Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

re<br />

Bloempoort Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Masakaneng Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Masoing Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

15 Holneck Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Vlaklaagte Rural 19 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Maraganeng Rural 15 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Keerom 1 & 2 Rural 16 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

600 None


390<br />

DEVELOPMENT AREAS <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> FINANCIAL YEAR<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROJECT DURATION TOTAL<br />

EXPEND<br />

ITURE<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> WARD VILLAGE (AREA) SUBSID<br />

Y<br />

PROGR<br />

AMME<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />

FETAKGOMO MUNICIPALITY<br />

WARD AREAS<br />

S<br />

SUBSID<br />

Y<br />

BENEF<br />

ICIARI<br />

ES/HO<br />

USES<br />

Benefi<br />

ciaries/<br />

House<br />

s<br />

NONE<br />

MTEF<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>- 20<strong>14</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong> 15<br />

R’000 R’001<br />

CURRENT<br />

STATUS<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> 22 Phomola Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

mangaung Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

Posa Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project


391<br />

Makeke Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

3 Seroka Rural 40 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

Malekaskraal Rural 50 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

Mapoteng Rural 40 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

Ga-phasha Rural 40 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

5 Sekateng Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

Tjiebane/Komane/M<br />

akgaleng<br />

Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

Maroteng(Mohlalets<br />

e)<br />

Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

Ga-Tladi<br />

(Photo/Matotomale)<br />

Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

Bofala Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New<br />

project<br />

TOTAL 310 None<br />

DEVELOPMENT AREAS <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> FINANCIAL YEAR<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROJECT DURATION TOTAL<br />

EXPEND<br />

ITURE<br />

MTEF<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

2012-13 <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

20<strong>14</strong>-<br />

15<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> WARD VILLAGE SUBSID BENEFICIA R’000 R’001<br />

CURRENT<br />

STATUS


392<br />

(AREA)<br />

Y<br />

PROGR<br />

AMME<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />

EPHRAIME MOGALE MUNICIPALITY<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> WARDS AREAS SUBSID<br />

Y<br />

RIES /<br />

HOUSES<br />

Beneficiari<br />

es/Houses<br />

1 Malebitsa Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

2 Spitspunt Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Uitvlught<br />

3 Matlala- a Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Ramoshebo<br />

4 Moganyaka Rural 184 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

5 Mmakgatle Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

6 Moomane Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

7 Marble hall Rural 66 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

TOTAL 400 None<br />

NONE


393<br />

DEVELOPMENT AREAS <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> FINANCIAL YEAR<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROJECT DURATION TOTAL<br />

EXPEND<br />

ITURE<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> WARD VILLAGE<br />

(AREA)<br />

SUBSID<br />

Y/<br />

PROGR<br />

AMME<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT<br />

GREATER TUBATSE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> WARDS AREAS Rural/Ur<br />

ban<br />

BENEFICIA<br />

RIES/HOU<br />

SES<br />

Beneficiari<br />

es/Houses<br />

MTEF<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

2012-13 <strong>2013</strong>- 20<strong>14</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong> 15<br />

R’000 R’001<br />

NONE<br />

CURRENT<br />

STATUS<br />

Ward 1 Ga-Mabelane Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Mapareng Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

New Stand Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Makopung Rural 25 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Malaeneng Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Ohrigstad Rural - <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Makgalane Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Maepa Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Mantshibe Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project


394<br />

Banareng Rural 15 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Selahle Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Ward 2 Mapodile Rural 15 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Tukakgomo Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Matimatsatsi Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Mashagoseb Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

o<br />

Ga-Mawela Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Bobididi Rural - <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Garagopola Rural 10 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Chrome Club Rural - <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Ward 3 Makgopa Rural 35 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Seefane Rural 45 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Maakgake Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Swale Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Marapong Rural 20 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Malaeneng Rural 35 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Moshate Rural 35 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Motlamotse Rural 25 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Ditwebeleng Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Ward 4 Riba Cross Rural 30 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Sections Rural 50 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

Morewane Rural 45 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project


395<br />

Mandela Rural 50 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

New Stand Rural 40 <strong>2013</strong>/01/04 31/03/<strong>14</strong> None New project<br />

TOTAL 0 825


396<br />

Project<br />

/Programme<br />

name<br />

Special<br />

Economic Zones<br />

Implementation<br />

Limpopo<br />

Business<br />

Registration Act<br />

Biodiversity<br />

scientific support<br />

services on<br />

biodiversity<br />

management<br />

Tisane Cultural<br />

Village ( Phaahla<br />

Eco-Tourism<br />

Projects<br />

2. LEDET<br />

Project /<br />

Programme<br />

description<br />

Establishment of<br />

Special Economic<br />

Zones to stimulate<br />

industrial activities<br />

and attract<br />

investment<br />

Capacitate<br />

municipalities<br />

Provide scientific<br />

support services on<br />

biodiversity<br />

management<br />

Development of a<br />

cultural village and a<br />

Nature reserve<br />

Local municipality/<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Project/programme<br />

duration<br />

Total budget<br />

Greater Tubatse Minimum of 5 years DTI to provide<br />

infrastructure and<br />

feasibility studies<br />

budget<br />

Local municipality Twelve months 139 000 139 000<br />

MTEF forward estimates<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/15 2015/16<br />

- - -<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 8 months 500 000 500 000 500 000 500 000<br />

Makhuduthamaga<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>2013</strong>-2016<br />

NDT funding the<br />

Project through SRI<br />

programme<br />

R20 m<br />

Safety Monitors<br />

Training and<br />

placement of 50<br />

Tourism Safety<br />

Monitors at strategic<br />

places for Tourism<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> R19 m<br />

NDT funding the<br />

Project for<br />

R19 m


397<br />

Project<br />

/Programme<br />

name<br />

Project /<br />

Programme<br />

description<br />

purposes<br />

Local municipality/<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Project/programme<br />

duration<br />

Total budget<br />

Provinces.<br />

MTEF forward estimates<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/15 2015/16


398<br />

Project<br />

/Programme name<br />

Approve <strong>14</strong>5 home<br />

loans @ R300 000k<br />

per home loan<br />

3. LIMPOPO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (LEDA)<br />

Project /<br />

Programme<br />

description<br />

Grant loans to the<br />

value of R43.5m<br />

Local<br />

municipality/<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

All the <strong>District</strong><br />

Municipalities<br />

Project/programme<br />

duration<br />

Total budget<br />

<strong>2013</strong> - 16 R150m R43.5m<br />

R55,2m<br />

MTEF forward estimates<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/15 2015/16<br />

R50,8m<br />

Job Creation<br />

Job maintenance<br />

Khumong Chrome<br />

(Maandagshoek 5)<br />

Sefateng Chrome<br />

(Zwaartkoppies)<br />

Tshepong<br />

Chrome(Twyefelaar)<br />

PGM at ASA Metals<br />

Create 870 jobs<br />

Maintain 2175 jobs<br />

Chrome bankable<br />

feasibility study<br />

Chrome bulk<br />

sampling and<br />

feasibility study<br />

Chrome bankable<br />

feasibility study<br />

PGM dumps<br />

retreatment<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 20 years 4 500 m 1 500 m 2 000 m<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 10 years 500m 15 m 20 m 75 m<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 7 years 50m 1 m<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> 5 years 50 m 20 m 30 m<br />

Public passenger<br />

Transport<br />

Providing public<br />

transportation to<br />

commuters<br />

All districts in<br />

Limpopo<br />

The programme<br />

runs on a daily basis<br />

R584m<br />

R680m<br />

R806m<br />

R749m


399<br />

Project<br />

/Programme<br />

name<br />

10 Prioritized<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Development for<br />

Provincial Nature<br />

Reserves (<br />

Lekgalameetse ,<br />

Makuya,<br />

Doorndraai Dam,<br />

N’wanedi ,<br />

Nylsvley, Rust De<br />

Winter, D’nyala,<br />

Letaba Ranch,<br />

Makapan Valley<br />

World Heritage<br />

Site, Schuinsdraai<br />

Dam or Blouberg.)<br />

4. LIMPOPO TOURISM AUTHORITY (LTA)<br />

Project /<br />

Programme<br />

description<br />

LTA to<br />

implement<br />

Reserves<br />

infrastructure<br />

Programme to<br />

maintain,<br />

upgrade and<br />

develop<br />

infrastructure<br />

on prioritized<br />

Provincial<br />

Nature<br />

Reserves as<br />

per attached<br />

Project Plan,<br />

Local municipality/<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Project/programme<br />

duration<br />

The whole Province <strong>2013</strong>/2016<br />

LTA to manage the<br />

Funds as per<br />

Project Plan<br />

Total budget<br />

R60 m<br />

MTEF forward estimates<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/15 2015/16


400<br />

PROJECT<br />

NAME<br />

PROGR<br />

AMME<br />

NAME<br />

PROJECT<br />

DESCRIPT<br />

ION/ TYPE<br />

OF<br />

STRUCTU<br />

RE<br />

5. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

PROGR<br />

AMME<br />

DESCRI<br />

PTION<br />

DISTRICT<br />

MUNICIPALI<br />

TY<br />

LOCAL<br />

MUNICIP<br />

ALITY<br />

PROJECT/PROGRAMME<br />

DURATION<br />

TOTAL<br />

BUDGE<br />

T R’000<br />

EXPENDI<br />

TURE TO<br />

DATE<br />

FROM<br />

PREVIOU<br />

S YEARS<br />

R’000<br />

MTEF FORWARD<br />

ESTIMATES R’000<br />

CURREN<br />

T<br />

STATUS<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

VEP<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

Office<br />

Accommodatio<br />

n<br />

Progra<br />

m 1<br />

Progra<br />

m 1<br />

VEP<br />

Office<br />

Accommo<br />

dation<br />

Admini<br />

stration<br />

Admini<br />

stration<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e<br />

Makhudu<br />

thamaga<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Date: Start<br />

Date:<br />

Finish<br />

MTEF<br />

2012/13<br />

MTEF<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/1<br />

4<br />

MTEF<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

01/04/2015 20/05/2016 <strong>23</strong> 336 0 0 3 160 Planning<br />

01/05/2015 30/10/2015 13 420 0 500 11 672 Planning


401<br />

6. EDUCATION<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Apel Circuit<br />

Office<br />

Asiphumelel<br />

e Special<br />

School<br />

Baphadima<br />

Secondary<br />

Batau<br />

Secondary<br />

Bokoni<br />

Primary<br />

School<br />

Bopedi Ba<br />

Pedi<br />

Secondary<br />

Dimo<br />

Secondary<br />

Diphale<br />

Secondary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Administration<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Fetakgom<br />

o<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

Education<br />

Office<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

01 April<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2015<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R 1<br />

500<br />

R 10<br />

843<br />

R 1<br />

200<br />

R 4<br />

175<br />

R<br />

500<br />

R 10<br />

500<br />

R 8<br />

075<br />

R 9<br />

975<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

R<br />

375<br />

R<br />

500<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

500<br />

R 5<br />

343<br />

R<br />

500<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

200<br />

R 0<br />

R 3<br />

075<br />

R 0 R 5<br />

500<br />

R 0<br />

R 10<br />

000<br />

R 2<br />

000


402<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Driekop<br />

Secondary<br />

ELIAS<br />

MASANGO<br />

PRIMARY<br />

Flag-<br />

Boshielo<br />

primary<br />

Glen Cowie<br />

Secondary<br />

Hlogotlou<br />

Circuit<br />

Ikageng<br />

Primary<br />

Ikhwezi<br />

Lokusa<br />

Primary<br />

Itirele<br />

Primary<br />

School<br />

(Original<br />

School Not<br />

Offshooot)<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Administration<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Education<br />

Office<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Specialise<br />

d<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

infrastructure<br />

Asset<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Rehabilitatio<br />

n,<br />

Renovations<br />

or<br />

Refurbishme<br />

nt<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Renovations,<br />

Rehabilitation or<br />

Refurbishments<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 9<br />

558<br />

R 8<br />

155<br />

R 2<br />

000<br />

R 11<br />

300<br />

R 6<br />

445<br />

R 9<br />

504<br />

R 12<br />

842<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

380<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0 R 0<br />

R 9<br />

102<br />

R 0 R 0 R 4<br />

155<br />

R 4<br />

741<br />

R<br />

836<br />

R 3<br />

508<br />

R 5<br />

300<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 2<br />

000


403<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Itsoseng<br />

Primary<br />

Itsoseng<br />

Primary<br />

Jacob Langa<br />

L/Primary<br />

Jacob<br />

Sefako<br />

Secondary<br />

Jafta Primary<br />

(Merging<br />

Schools)<br />

Jane Furse<br />

Special<br />

Primary<br />

School<br />

Kenneth<br />

Masekela<br />

Primary<br />

Kgahlanong<br />

Secondary<br />

School<br />

Kgaladi<br />

Primary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makh<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Specialise<br />

d<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Technical<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

ELSEN<br />

schools 2<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Recapitalisat<br />

ion of<br />

Technical<br />

Secondary<br />

schools<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Maintenance and Repairs <strong>2013</strong>/0<br />

4/01<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2015<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

2016/03<br />

/31<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R 5<br />

782<br />

R 6<br />

107<br />

R<br />

491<br />

R 41<br />

300<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R 8<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

100<br />

R 12<br />

398<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

104<br />

R 4<br />

300<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0 R 0 R<br />

491<br />

R 7<br />

047<br />

R 6<br />

000<br />

R<br />

585<br />

R 6<br />

519<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 2<br />

000<br />

R 0<br />

R 5<br />

289<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R<br />

590


404<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Kgarathutu<br />

Primary<br />

Kgokodibeng<br />

Secondary<br />

Kgotlopong<br />

Primary<br />

Kgotswane<br />

Secondary<br />

Kopa<br />

Secondary<br />

Kwata<br />

Primary<br />

Lamola<br />

Secondary<br />

Leboeng<br />

Primary<br />

Leboeng<br />

primary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

infrastructure<br />

Asset<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Renovations,<br />

Rehabilitatio<br />

n or<br />

Refurbishme<br />

nts<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01-<br />

May-12<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Renovations,<br />

Rehabilitation or<br />

Refurbishments<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

2015/03<br />

/31<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 3<br />

500<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 3<br />

500<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

380 380 R<br />

0.00<br />

R 8<br />

395<br />

R 10<br />

500<br />

R 4<br />

920<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 5<br />

500<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

R 5<br />

500<br />

R 6<br />

765<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 1<br />

<strong>23</strong>0<br />

R 4<br />

920<br />

R<br />

380


405<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Legare<br />

Secondary<br />

Lehlabile<br />

Secondary<br />

Lehwelere<br />

High<br />

Lekala<br />

secondary<br />

Lesailane<br />

Secondary<br />

Leshalabe<br />

Primary<br />

Lobethal<br />

Primary<br />

Luckau<br />

Primary<br />

Magale<br />

Secondary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

infrastructure<br />

Asset<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2015<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R 8<br />

715<br />

R 4<br />

600<br />

R 3<br />

200<br />

R 7<br />

622<br />

R 3<br />

000<br />

R<br />

500<br />

R 1<br />

000<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 3<br />

285<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 5<br />

500<br />

R 4<br />

600<br />

R 3<br />

200<br />

R 2<br />

300<br />

R 3<br />

000<br />

R<br />

500<br />

R 1<br />

000<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 3<br />

285<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 2<br />

800<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)


406<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Mahlaba<br />

Secondary<br />

MAHLAGAU<br />

ME<br />

PRIMARY<br />

Mahlare<br />

Secondary<br />

Makeke<br />

Primary<br />

Makeke<br />

primary<br />

Makofane<br />

Primary<br />

MAKOPI<br />

SECONDAR<br />

Y<br />

Makuane<br />

Secondary<br />

Makwe<br />

secondary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

infrastructure<br />

Asset<br />

Renovations,<br />

Rehabilitatio<br />

n or<br />

Refurbishme<br />

nts<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Maintenance<br />

and repairs<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

Renovations,<br />

Rehabilitation or<br />

Refurbishments<br />

01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01-<br />

May-13<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2015<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

2015/03<br />

/31<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R 6<br />

000<br />

R 2<br />

400<br />

R 9<br />

765<br />

R 8<br />

600<br />

R 8<br />

190<br />

R<br />

500<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 4<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

200<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

500<br />

R 2<br />

400<br />

R 3<br />

500<br />

R 4<br />

440<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

R<br />

500<br />

R 4<br />

000<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 5<br />

800<br />

R 0<br />

R 2<br />

800<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

200


407<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Makwe<br />

Secondary<br />

Makwetle<br />

secondary<br />

Makwetle<br />

Secondary<br />

Malengine<br />

Secondary<br />

Mamakgatla<br />

pe primary<br />

Mampana<br />

primary<br />

Mang – le –<br />

Mang<br />

Secondary<br />

MANNYETH<br />

A PRIMARY<br />

Manoke<br />

Secondary<br />

Manotong<br />

Primary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Fetakgom<br />

o<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 3<br />

200<br />

R 9<br />

963<br />

R 9<br />

969<br />

R 1<br />

200<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R<br />

450<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 3<br />

200<br />

R 5<br />

500<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 9<br />

963<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

200<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R<br />

450


408<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Manotwane<br />

Primary<br />

Mapiti<br />

Primary<br />

Mapogo<br />

Primary<br />

Marei<br />

Primary<br />

Maserumule<br />

High<br />

Masha<br />

Primary<br />

Mashakwane<br />

ng<br />

Secondary<br />

Mashile<br />

Primary<br />

Mashung<br />

Primary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

infrastructure<br />

Asset<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01-<br />

May-12<br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

2015/03<br />

/31<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R 8<br />

524<br />

R 3<br />

299<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 8<br />

118<br />

R 0 R 3<br />

299<br />

900 0 R<br />

900<br />

R 8<br />

925<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 1<br />

200<br />

R 7<br />

841<br />

R<br />

800<br />

R 5<br />

500<br />

R 3<br />

000<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

200<br />

R 0<br />

R 7<br />

841<br />

R<br />

800


409<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Mashwele<br />

Primary<br />

(Katlegong<br />

Vleerschboo<br />

m)<br />

Matailane<br />

High<br />

Matailane<br />

Secondary<br />

Matatadiben<br />

g Primary<br />

Mathibeng<br />

Primary<br />

Mathume<br />

Secondary<br />

Matime<br />

Primary<br />

Matlala<br />

Primary<br />

Matlala<br />

Primary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Fetakgom<br />

o<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

sekhuk<br />

hune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

infrastructure<br />

Asset<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

infrastructure<br />

Asset<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions <strong>2013</strong>/0<br />

4/01<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

2016/03<br />

/31<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R 3<br />

299<br />

R 4<br />

200<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 5<br />

050<br />

R 10<br />

500<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 10<br />

487<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

600<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 5<br />

400<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0 R 3<br />

299<br />

R 0<br />

R 1<br />

000<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 4<br />

200<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 5<br />

050<br />

R 4<br />

100<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 9<br />

987<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

600


410<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Matsebong<br />

Secondary<br />

Matshumane<br />

Secondary<br />

Matsitsi<br />

Primary<br />

Mmathabeng<br />

Primary<br />

Mmutlane<br />

Secondary<br />

Mninwa<br />

Mahlangu<br />

Primary<br />

Modipa<br />

Secondary<br />

Mogalatsane<br />

Primary<br />

Mogale wa<br />

bagale<br />

Technical<br />

High School<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Fetakgom<br />

o<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Technical<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Recapitalisat<br />

ion of<br />

Technical<br />

schools<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R 3<br />

299<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 3<br />

299<br />

R 1<br />

800<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 3<br />

299<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 1<br />

800<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R 0 R 3<br />

299<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 3<br />

299<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 0 R 3<br />

299


411<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Moganetswa<br />

primary<br />

Mogohlwane<br />

secondary<br />

Mogohlwane<br />

Secondary<br />

Mogolo<br />

Secondary<br />

Mohloping<br />

Primary<br />

Mokgeretli<br />

secondary<br />

Mokgeretli<br />

Secondary<br />

Mokgoba<br />

Primary<br />

Mokgubi<br />

Secondary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Rehabilitatio<br />

n,<br />

Renovations<br />

or<br />

Refurbishme<br />

nt<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Renovations,<br />

Rehabilitation or<br />

Refurbishments<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2011<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2011<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2015<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 3<br />

299<br />

R 15<br />

773<br />

R 9<br />

100<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 7<br />

000<br />

R 6<br />

589<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 0 R 3<br />

299<br />

R 4<br />

920<br />

R 2<br />

511<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 3<br />

075<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380


412<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Mokoeneam<br />

abula<br />

Secondary<br />

Moloke<br />

Combined<br />

(Split<br />

secondary<br />

from primary<br />

section)<br />

Moreri<br />

Choenyane<br />

secondary<br />

Moretlwe<br />

Secondary<br />

Moripane<br />

Primary<br />

Moriti High<br />

Moshiane<br />

Primary<br />

Moteane<br />

secondary<br />

Mothibedi<br />

Combined<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Fetakgom<br />

o<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Fetakgom<br />

o<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Fetakgom<br />

o<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Combined<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

Infrastructur<br />

e Asset<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R 2<br />

900<br />

R 1<br />

200<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

300<br />

R 9<br />

396<br />

R<br />

450<br />

R 10<br />

720<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

2900<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

200<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 4<br />

636<br />

R 0<br />

R 6<br />

519<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

300<br />

R 4<br />

312<br />

R<br />

450<br />

R 3<br />

690


413<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Motjedi High<br />

Motjere<br />

Secondary<br />

Motloulela<br />

Secondary<br />

Motsatsana<br />

Primary<br />

Motsepe<br />

Primary<br />

Mpelegeng<br />

Primary<br />

(Upgrade<br />

school from<br />

Grade R -<br />

Grade 7)<br />

Mphage<br />

Secondary<br />

Mpilo<br />

Secondary<br />

Nape-A-<br />

Ngoato High<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

Infrastructur<br />

e Asset<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R 1<br />

200<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R 3<br />

299<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R 1<br />

200<br />

R<br />

380<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

200<br />

R 0<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R 0 R 3<br />

299<br />

R 0<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

200<br />

R 0<br />

R<br />

380


4<strong>14</strong><br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Nareng<br />

Secondary<br />

Ngwanabeka<br />

ne Primary<br />

Ngwanangw<br />

ato High<br />

Ngwanasena<br />

na Primary<br />

Ngwanatshw<br />

ane<br />

Secondary<br />

Njinga<br />

Sindane<br />

Primary<br />

Nkoana<br />

William<br />

Maditsi<br />

Primary<br />

Nkotwane<br />

Secondary<br />

Ntabane<br />

Secondary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions <strong>2013</strong>/0<br />

4/01<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 2012/0<br />

5/01<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

2016/03<br />

/31<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

2016/03<br />

/31<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R 9<br />

135<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 10<br />

395<br />

R 12<br />

657<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 3<br />

100<br />

R 3<br />

500<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 3<br />

600<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 6<br />

400<br />

R 7<br />

872<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R 2<br />

000<br />

R<br />

900<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

495<br />

R 4<br />

182


415<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Ntshebele<br />

Secondary<br />

Ntshitshimal<br />

e Primary<br />

Nyaane<br />

Primary<br />

Or Tambo<br />

Comprehens<br />

ive<br />

Paapa<br />

Primary<br />

Paepae<br />

Secondary<br />

Paledi<br />

Primary<br />

Pataneng<br />

Primary<br />

Patantshwan<br />

a Primary<br />

Phatametsan<br />

e Secondary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R 1<br />

374<br />

R 1<br />

200<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 9<br />

041<br />

R 1<br />

200<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 8<br />

250<br />

R<br />

380<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 4<br />

100<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

374<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

200<br />

R 0<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 8<br />

610<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

200<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380


416<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Phetameetsa<br />

na<br />

Secondary<br />

Phoko<br />

Primary<br />

Photohlogoa<br />

na Primary<br />

Phukubjane<br />

Primary<br />

Ponti<br />

Secondary<br />

Potlake<br />

Secondary<br />

Potlake<br />

Secondary<br />

Pulane High<br />

Ramphelane<br />

High<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

Infrastructur<br />

e Asset<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2015<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2015<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R 9<br />

030<br />

R 4<br />

500<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 2<br />

000<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 10<br />

290<br />

R 6<br />

000<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 3<br />

285<br />

R 4<br />

000<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 6<br />

100<br />

R 1<br />

215<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 4<br />

500<br />

R 2<br />

000<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 2<br />

500<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 2<br />

000<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R 2<br />

700


417<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Rekhuditse<br />

Secondary<br />

Riba Primary<br />

Rootse<br />

Primary<br />

Sanitation<br />

Projects<br />

Sebjaneng<br />

Primary<br />

(Dinaletsana<br />

for<br />

Matshumane<br />

)<br />

Sedikwe<br />

Primary<br />

Seetseng<br />

Primary<br />

Sejadipudi<br />

Primary<br />

Sekale<br />

Primary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Various<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Variou<br />

s<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

Infrastructur<br />

e Asset<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Schools Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Renovations,<br />

Rehabilitatio<br />

n or<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Renovations,<br />

Rehabilitation or<br />

Refurbishments<br />

01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R<br />

750<br />

R 1<br />

500<br />

R 10<br />

332<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 5<br />

361<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

300<br />

R 10<br />

074<br />

R 4<br />

500<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

750<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

500<br />

R 6<br />

765<br />

R 0<br />

R 3<br />

075<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 0 R 5<br />

361<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R 0 R 0 R<br />

300<br />

R 4<br />

500<br />

R 6<br />

642<br />

R 3<br />

075


418<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Refurbishme<br />

nts<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

schools<br />

(Closeout of<br />

projects)<br />

Sekwati<br />

Primary<br />

Sekwati<br />

Secondary<br />

(Created by<br />

splitting<br />

Sango<br />

Primary)<br />

Selatole<br />

Primary<br />

Selebalo<br />

Secondary<br />

Semashego<br />

Primary<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Greater<br />

Sekhukhu<br />

ne <strong>District</strong><br />

Municipali<br />

ty<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Technical<br />

Assistance<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

Infrastructur<br />

e Asset<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

Infrastructur<br />

e Asset<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Rehabilitatio<br />

n,<br />

Renovations<br />

or<br />

Refurbishme<br />

nt<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Renovations,<br />

Rehabilitation or<br />

Refurbishments<br />

01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

R 9<br />

320<br />

R 6<br />

825<br />

R 6<br />

150<br />

R 5<br />

880<br />

R 7<br />

104<br />

R 9<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

320<br />

R 1<br />

000<br />

R 4<br />

500<br />

R 4<br />

300<br />

R 0<br />

R 2<br />

000<br />

R 6<br />

150<br />

R 1<br />

580<br />

R 6<br />

765


419<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Semoriri<br />

secondary<br />

Semoriri<br />

Secondary<br />

Seroletshidi<br />

Secondary<br />

Shorwane<br />

Secondary<br />

Sisabonga<br />

Primary<br />

Slovo Park<br />

Primary<br />

Sogane<br />

Secondary<br />

ST Paul<br />

Secondary<br />

Storm<br />

Damaged<br />

Schools<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Various<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Variou<br />

s<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Rehabilitatio<br />

n,<br />

Renovations<br />

or<br />

Refurbishme<br />

nt<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Renovations,<br />

Rehabilitation or<br />

Refurbishments<br />

01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Schools Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 11<br />

685<br />

R<br />

675<br />

R 3<br />

617<br />

R 1<br />

500<br />

R 3<br />

299<br />

R 3<br />

300<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

900<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 7<br />

380<br />

R<br />

675<br />

R 3<br />

444<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

500<br />

R 0 R 3<br />

299<br />

R 0<br />

R 3<br />

300<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R<br />

900


420<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Tagane<br />

Primary<br />

Tantanyane<br />

Primary<br />

Tautlou<br />

Primary<br />

Teleki<br />

Primary<br />

Thabampshe<br />

Primary<br />

Thabisong<br />

Primary<br />

Thabong<br />

Primary<br />

Tiitsane<br />

Primary<br />

Tlou Matlala<br />

Sec<br />

Tlouphuti<br />

Secondary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

ED<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R 10<br />

503<br />

R 1<br />

700<br />

R 6<br />

409<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 1<br />

200<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 6<br />

845<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 2<br />

400<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

200<br />

R 6<br />

409<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 10<br />

002<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 0 R 1<br />

200<br />

R 0<br />

R 0<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 6<br />

519<br />

R<br />

600<br />

R 2<br />

400


421<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Toilet<br />

Maintenance<br />

- Various<br />

Schools<br />

Tshege<br />

Secondary<br />

Tshehlwane<br />

ng<br />

Secondary<br />

Tshwaane<br />

Primary<br />

Tshweele<br />

Primary<br />

Tshweele<br />

Primary<br />

Tsoatago<br />

Primary<br />

Tumishi<br />

Primary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Various<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Makhudut<br />

hamaga<br />

Ephriam<br />

Mogale<br />

Fetakgom<br />

o<br />

Fetakgom<br />

o<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

All<br />

district<br />

s<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Riba<br />

Cross<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

School -<br />

Primary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

Maintenance<br />

and Repairs<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

New or<br />

Replaced<br />

Infrastructur<br />

e Asset<br />

Rehabilitatio<br />

n,<br />

Renovations<br />

or<br />

Refurbishme<br />

nt<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Maintenance and Repairs 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

New or Replaced<br />

Infrastructure Asset<br />

Renovations,<br />

Rehabilitation or<br />

Refurbishments<br />

01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

2015<br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

31<br />

March<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R<br />

150<br />

R 10<br />

552<br />

R 9<br />

917<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

R 5<br />

400<br />

R 3<br />

600<br />

R 2<br />

750<br />

R 4<br />

500<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 3<br />

000<br />

R 6<br />

279<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

R 5<br />

400<br />

R 3<br />

600<br />

R 2<br />

750<br />

R 4<br />

500<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 2<br />

500<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

150


422<br />

Project<br />

name<br />

Yigugulethu<br />

Primary<br />

Budget<br />

Program Name<br />

Public Ordinary<br />

School<br />

Education<br />

Municipa<br />

lity Name<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoale<br />

di<br />

Distric<br />

t<br />

Munici<br />

pality<br />

Name<br />

Sekhu<br />

khune<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastruct<br />

ure<br />

School -<br />

Secondary<br />

Type of<br />

Infrastructu<br />

re<br />

Upgrade and<br />

Additions<br />

BAS Alignment<br />

Target<br />

Start<br />

Date<br />

Upgrade and Additions 01<br />

April<br />

2015<br />

Target<br />

Comple<br />

tion<br />

Date<br />

31<br />

March<br />

2016<br />

Source of<br />

funding<br />

Education<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Grant<br />

Total<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

Cost<br />

R<br />

380<br />

MTE<br />

F 2<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

MTE<br />

F 3<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/<br />

15<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R 0<br />

MTE<br />

F 4<br />

2015/<br />

16<br />

(R'00<br />

0)<br />

R<br />

380<br />

R<br />

739<br />

612<br />

R<br />

211<br />

373<br />

R<br />

1<strong>23</strong><br />

352<br />

R<br />

258<br />

863<br />

1160<br />

412


4<strong>23</strong><br />

7. AGRICULTURE<br />

a. LDA Infrastructure proposed projects for <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

LDA Infrastructure proposed projects for <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

Project names Municipalities Project description Estimated budget<br />

Kopano Disable Ephraim Mogale Payment of retention for installed<br />

<strong>23</strong>6 736<br />

irrigation systems<br />

Rahlagane Ephraim Mogale Construction of Packhouse 500 000<br />

Matabane Elias Motsoaledi Tunnels 1 500 000<br />

Phasudi a Phohungwana Fetakgomo Planning of Irrigation system 1 250 000<br />

Makhuduthamaga Tomato Makhuduthamaga<br />

Planning of Irrigation systems for<br />

1 500 000<br />

Growers Phase 2<br />

four farmers<br />

Kalokanang Ephraim Mogale Planning of irrigation system 1 250 000<br />

Bapedi Fetakgomo Planning 30ha irrigation 1 300 000<br />

SAADC Ephraim Mogale Planning 38ha irrigation 2 300 000<br />

Malete Elias Motsoaledi Upgrade of Piggery structure 506 000<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> SI Tubatse Construction of 50 Sower Unit<br />

2 430 000<br />

Piggery Unit<br />

JDP Piggery Tubatse Construction of 50 Sower Unit<br />

2 500 000<br />

Piggery Unit<br />

Mpshe Egg- laying project Elias Motsoaledi Construction of poultry house and<br />

250 000<br />

accessories<br />

Beutitute ECPH Elias Motsoaledi Construction of ECPH 6 000 000<br />

Thulane Dairy Elias Motsoaledi Completion of layer units 300 000<br />

Tompi Seleka Piggery Ephraim Mogale Completion of 16 sow unit 4 500 000<br />

Krokodilheuwel dam Makhuduthamaga Dam safety repairs 600 000<br />

Hereford Bulk water supply Elias Motsoaledi Bulk water system upgrade 8 000 000<br />

Tompi Seleka irrigation Marble Hall In-field irrigation upgrade 1 800 000


424<br />

LDA Infrastructure proposed projects for <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

Project names Municipalities Project description Estimated budget<br />

Tompi Seleka Bio-diesel Marble Hall Bio-diesel Processing project 8 000 000<br />

Krokodilheuwel Irrigation Makhuduthamaga In-field irrigation upgrade 2 900 000<br />

Setlaboswane Irrigation Makhuduthamaga In-field irrigation upgrade 2 200 000<br />

Phetwane Irrigation Marble Hall In-field irrigation upgrade 300 000<br />

Mogalatsane Irrigation Marble Hall In-field irrigation upgrade 1 500 000<br />

Planning & Design Fees All Planning and design of schemes for 10 000 000<br />

future projects<br />

Construction supervision All Construction Supervision for projects<br />

under implementation<br />

5 000 000<br />

b. Land Care Projects <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong>: Conditional Grant<br />

PROJECT NAMES MUNICIPALITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION<br />

ESTIMATED<br />

BUDGET<br />

Leolo Tubatse Soil conservation R 800 000.00<br />

Fetakgomo Fetakgomo Soil conservation R 800 000.00<br />

Makhuduthamaga Makhuduthamaga Veld management R 850 000.00<br />

Moutse East Elias Motsoaledi Veld management R 800 000.00<br />

Moutse West Ephraim Mogale Alien plant control R 942 500.00


425<br />

8. Department of Roads and Transport<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Type of infrastructure Project duration Source of funding<br />

Date: Start Date: Finish<br />

Makhuduthamaga Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

Elias Motsoaledi Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

Elias Motsoaledi Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

Elias Motsoaledi Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

Ephraim Mohale Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

Ephraim Mohale Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

Elias Motsoaledi Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

Elias Motsoaledi Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

Makhuduthamaga Reseal/rehabilitation 01/04/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

Makhuduthamaga Upgrading of access roads 01/08/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

Makhuduthamaga Upgrading of access roads 01/08/<strong>2013</strong> 31/03/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

Fetakgomo Household based routine<br />

road maintenance<br />

Elias Motsoaledi Household based routine<br />

road maintenance<br />

Makhuduthamaga Household based routine<br />

road maintenance<br />

01/09/<strong>2013</strong> 30/08/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

01/11/<strong>2013</strong> 31/10/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

01/10/<strong>2013</strong> 31/09/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant


426<br />

Ephraim Mogale<br />

Greater Tubatse<br />

Household based routine<br />

road maintenance<br />

Household based routine<br />

road maintenance<br />

01/09/<strong>2013</strong> 30/08/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

01/09/<strong>2013</strong> 30/08/20<strong>14</strong> Conditional Grant<br />

9. Department of Sports, Art and Culture<br />

PROJECT<br />

NAME<br />

PROGRAMM<br />

E NAME<br />

PROJECT<br />

DESCRIPTION/<br />

TYPE OF<br />

STRUCTURE<br />

PROGR<br />

AMME<br />

DESCRI<br />

PTION<br />

DISTRIC<br />

T<br />

MUNICIP<br />

ALITY<br />

LOCAL<br />

MUNICIPALIT<br />

Y<br />

PROJECT/PROGR<br />

AMME DURATION<br />

TOTA<br />

L<br />

BUDG<br />

ET<br />

EXPENDI<br />

TURE TO<br />

DATE<br />

FROM<br />

PREVIOU<br />

S YEAR<br />

MTEF FORWARD<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

CUR<br />

REN<br />

T<br />

STAT<br />

US<br />

DATE<br />

START<br />

DATE<br />

FINISH<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> <strong>2013</strong>/.20<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

Construction of<br />

Phokwane<br />

library<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Construction of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e DM<br />

Makhuduthamag<br />

a<br />

0 R8,000, 000 0<br />

Upgrading of<br />

Marble Hall<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Upgrading of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e DM<br />

Marble Hall 0 R500,000 0


427<br />

PROJECT<br />

NAME<br />

PROGRAMM<br />

E NAME<br />

PROJECT<br />

DESCRIPTION/<br />

TYPE OF<br />

STRUCTURE<br />

PROGR<br />

AMME<br />

DESCRI<br />

PTION<br />

DISTRIC<br />

T<br />

MUNICIP<br />

ALITY<br />

LOCAL<br />

MUNICIPALIT<br />

Y<br />

PROJECT/PROGR<br />

AMME DURATION<br />

TOTA<br />

L<br />

BUDG<br />

ET<br />

EXPENDI<br />

TURE TO<br />

DATE<br />

FROM<br />

PREVIOU<br />

S YEAR<br />

MTEF FORWARD<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

CUR<br />

REN<br />

T<br />

STAT<br />

US<br />

DATE<br />

START<br />

DATE<br />

FINISH<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> <strong>2013</strong>/.20<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

Upgrading of<br />

Ohrigstad<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Upgrading of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e DM<br />

Greater Tubatse 0 0 R500,000<br />

Upgrading of<br />

Atok library<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Upgrading of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e DM<br />

Fetakgomo 0 0 0<br />

Maintenance of<br />

Groblersdal<br />

library<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Maintenance of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e DM<br />

Elias Motsoaledi 0 R250, 000 0<br />

Maintenance of<br />

Jane Furse<br />

library<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Maintenance of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e DM<br />

Makhuduthamag<br />

a<br />

0 0 R250, 000


428<br />

PROJECT<br />

NAME<br />

PROGRAMM<br />

E NAME<br />

PROJECT<br />

DESCRIPTION/<br />

TYPE OF<br />

STRUCTURE<br />

PROGR<br />

AMME<br />

DESCRI<br />

PTION<br />

DISTRIC<br />

T<br />

MUNICIP<br />

ALITY<br />

LOCAL<br />

MUNICIPALIT<br />

Y<br />

PROJECT/PROGR<br />

AMME DURATION<br />

TOTA<br />

L<br />

BUDG<br />

ET<br />

EXPENDI<br />

TURE TO<br />

DATE<br />

FROM<br />

PREVIOU<br />

S YEAR<br />

MTEF FORWARD<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

CUR<br />

REN<br />

T<br />

STAT<br />

US<br />

DATE<br />

START<br />

DATE<br />

FINISH<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> <strong>2013</strong>/.20<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

Maintenance of<br />

Patantswane<br />

library<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Maintenance of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e DM<br />

Makhuduthamag<br />

a<br />

0 0 R250 ,000<br />

Maintenance of<br />

Tubatse/Burgers<br />

fort library<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Maintenance of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e DM<br />

Tubatse 0 0 R250, 000<br />

Maintenance of<br />

Roosenekal<br />

library<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Maintenance of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e D<br />

Makhuduthamag<br />

a<br />

0 0 R250 ,000<br />

Maintenance of<br />

Ga-Phaahla<br />

library<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Maintenance of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e DM<br />

Makhuduthamag<br />

a<br />

0 0 R250, 000


429<br />

PROJECT<br />

NAME<br />

PROGRAMM<br />

E NAME<br />

PROJECT<br />

DESCRIPTION/<br />

TYPE OF<br />

STRUCTURE<br />

PROGR<br />

AMME<br />

DESCRI<br />

PTION<br />

DISTRIC<br />

T<br />

MUNICIP<br />

ALITY<br />

LOCAL<br />

MUNICIPALIT<br />

Y<br />

PROJECT/PROGR<br />

AMME DURATION<br />

TOTA<br />

L<br />

BUDG<br />

ET<br />

EXPENDI<br />

TURE TO<br />

DATE<br />

FROM<br />

PREVIOU<br />

S YEAR<br />

MTEF FORWARD<br />

ESTIMATES<br />

CUR<br />

REN<br />

T<br />

STAT<br />

US<br />

DATE<br />

START<br />

DATE<br />

FINISH<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong> <strong>2013</strong>/.20<strong>14</strong> 20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

Maintenance of<br />

Fetakgomo<br />

library<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Maintenance of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e DM<br />

Fetakgomo 0 0 R250, 000<br />

Maintenance of<br />

Vlakfontein<br />

library<br />

Library and<br />

Archives<br />

Services<br />

Maintenance of<br />

library<br />

Sekhukhun<br />

e DM<br />

Makhuduthamag<br />

a<br />

0 0 R250, R250, 000


430<br />

10. ESKOM<br />

PROJECT NAME BUDGET<br />

YEAR<br />

Zenzele <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Kgobokwane/Kgaphamadi <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Legolaneng <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Mmakola <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Vaalbank <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Mmotwaneng <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Toitskraal Agrcicultural <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

Holding<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Rathoke <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Phetwane <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Spitspunt <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Driefontein <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Leeufontein (Mosongo) <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Malebitsa <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Makgatle A <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

FUNDI<br />

NG<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

DoE<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

CODE & NAME<br />

LIM472 Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

LIM472 Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

LIM472 Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

LIM471 Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

LIM471 Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

LIM471 Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

LIM471 Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

LIM471 Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

LIM471 Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

LIM471 Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

LIM471 Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

LIM471 Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

LIM471 Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

LIM471 Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

DISTRICT<br />

COUNCIL<br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

PROVINCE PROJECT<br />

TYPE<br />

BUDGET (VAT INC) PLANNED<br />

CONNECTIONS<br />

LIMPOPO Household R1 930 500.00 <strong>14</strong>3<br />

LIMPOPO Household R2 025 000.00 150<br />

LIMPOPO Household R1 124 785.10 83<br />

LIMPOPO Household R8<strong>23</strong> 500.00 61<br />

LIMPOPO Household R440 000.00 20<br />

LIMPOPO Household R308 000.00 <strong>14</strong><br />

LIMPOPO Household R220 000.00 10<br />

LIMPOPO Household R1 282 500.00 95<br />

LIMPOPO Household R283 500.00 21<br />

LIMPOPO Household R351 000.00 26<br />

LIMPOPO Household R904 500.00 67<br />

LIMPOPO Household R1 065 460.00 60<br />

LIMPOPO Household R1 427 741.95 121<br />

LIMPOPO Household R1 847 <strong>23</strong>7.60 87


431<br />

PROJECT NAME<br />

Maisela/Mahlabaphoko,M<br />

apodi,Mapulaneng,Mashu<br />

ng &Nkwana<br />

Bogalatladi/Magololaneng<br />

& Sefateng<br />

Debeila/Mabopo,Magotwa<br />

neng,Mashung./Tlakale,M<br />

aswaneng,Mmashaku<br />

India(Ga Maisela),<br />

Malogeng, Malomanye<br />

Makgalane/banareng/mok<br />

upung<br />

BUDGET<br />

YEAR<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Mokutung <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Kgopaneng <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Maakubu <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Burgersfort ext <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Mamone Ph2 <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Greater Komane <strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

FUNDI<br />

NG<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

CODE & NAME<br />

DISTRICT<br />

COUNCIL<br />

DoE LIM474 Fetakgomo DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DoE LIM474 Fetakgomo DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DoE LIM474 Fetakgomo DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DoE LIM474 Fetakgomo DC47 Greater<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DoE LIM475 Greater DC47 Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DoE LIM475 Greater DC47 Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DoE LIM475 Greater DC47 Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DoE LIM475 Greater DC47 Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DoE LIM475 Greater DC47 Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DoE LIM473<br />

DC47 Greater<br />

Makhuduthamaga <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

DoE LIM473<br />

DC47 Greater<br />

Makhuduthamaga <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

PROVINCE PROJECT<br />

TYPE<br />

BUDGET (VAT INC) PLANNED<br />

CONNECTIONS<br />

LIMPOPO Household R6 075 000.00 450<br />

LIMPOPO Household R2 227 500.00 165<br />

LIMPOPO Household R432 000.00 32<br />

LIMPOPO Household R3 569 257.83 251<br />

LIMPOPO Household R15 191 684.67 813<br />

LIMPOPO Household R3 529 890.00 221<br />

LIMPOPO Household R4 171 500.00 309<br />

LIMPOPO Household R7 222 500.00 535<br />

LIMPOPO Household R2 <strong>14</strong>6 500.00 159<br />

LIMPOPO Household R 3 780 000.00 280<br />

LIMPOPO Household R 4 104 000.00 304<br />

R66 483 557.15 4 477


432<br />

CHAPTER 6:<br />

INTEGRATION<br />

PHASE


433<br />

6.1. STATUS OF SECTOR PLANS<br />

Table 100: Policies/strategies<br />

POLICY/PLAN/STRATEGY STATUS DATE APPROVED<br />

Employment Equity Plan Adopted 2009<br />

Workplace Skills Plan Adopted 2009<br />

Retention Strategy Adopted 2009<br />

PMS Adopted 2009<br />

Human Resource Development Strategy Adopted 2005<br />

Institutional Plan Draft Not Adopted<br />

Spatial Development Framework Adopted 2004<br />

Integrated Waste Management System Adopted 2007<br />

HIV/AIDS Plan Adopted 2007<br />

Health Plan Adopted 2009<br />

LED Strategy Adopted 2007<br />

Revenue Enhancement Strategy Draft Not Adopted<br />

Risk Management Plan Draft Not Adopted<br />

5 Year Investment Plan Draft Not Adopted<br />

Communication Strategy Adopted 2005<br />

WSDP Adopted 2005<br />

Road Master Plan Adopted 2008<br />

Tourism Strategy Adopted 2005<br />

Water Master Plan Adopted 2007<br />

Financial Plan Adopted 2010<br />

Marketing Strategy Adopted 2009<br />

Community Participation Plan Adopted 2005<br />

Integrated Transport Plan Draft Not Adopted<br />

6.2. SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />

SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (SDF)<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> Spatial Development Framework was adopted in 2004<br />

and reviewed in 2008. In terms of the Municipal Systems Act, an SDF is a component of an<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>. The act requires that it be compiled to give effect to the <strong>IDP</strong>. It is a legal framework that is<br />

desired to implement an <strong>IDP</strong>. It sets out objectives that reflect the desired spatial form of the<br />

district.


434<br />

The spatial development framework guides and informs all decision of the municipality relating<br />

to land use development and land planning. It guides and informs the direction of growth, major<br />

movement routes, special development areas and conservation of areas by:<br />

• Indicating desired pattern of land use<br />

• Addressing the spatial reconstruction of the location and nature of development in the<br />

district.<br />

• Providing strategic guidance in respect of the location and nature of development in the<br />

district.<br />

• Indicating where public and private land development and infrastructure development<br />

should take place.<br />

• Indicating desired or undesired utilization of space in a particular area within the district.<br />

• Delineating urban edge.<br />

• Identifying areas where strategic intervention is required.<br />

• Indicating where priority spending is required from a district point of view/scale for<br />

municipal but for district wide projects.<br />

SDM has recently compiled a review of the SDF. The reviewed SDF is in place and has<br />

identified the following spatial development objectives and principles:<br />

• To actively protect, enhance and manage the natural environmental resources in<br />

the municipality in order to ensure a sustainable equilibrium between the mining,<br />

tourism and agricultural industries in the area.<br />

• To optimally capitalize on the strategic location of the <strong>District</strong> by way of<br />

strengthening internal and external linkages within provincial and regional<br />

context.<br />

• To utilize the natural environmental and cultural historic features in the <strong>District</strong> as<br />

anchors from which to promote ecotourism and conservation.<br />

• To maximally utilize the mining potential in the district by way of the development<br />

of the Dilokong Corridor.<br />

• To promote commercial farming and food production along the Olifants River and<br />

Steelpoort River drainage systems in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

• To facilitate small scale and subsistence farming activities throughout the<br />

remainder part of the municipal area.<br />

• To promote industrial/commercial development in the <strong>District</strong> with specific<br />

emphasis on agro-processing in the agricultural belt (Groblersdal), and<br />

mining/ore-processing in the mining belt (Tubatse).<br />

• To create a strong east-west movement/development corridor in the <strong>District</strong><br />

functionally linking the tourism precincts, mining belt and agricultural belt to one<br />

another, and to the markets of Gauteng Province along the Moloto Corridor.


435<br />

• To supplement the <strong>District</strong> east-west corridor by way of three functional northsouth<br />

corridors:<br />

- N11: Agriculture, Commerce<br />

- R583: Institutional, Residential<br />

- R33: Mining<br />

· To ensure equitable access to social infrastructure and to promote Local Economic<br />

Development by way of an evenly distributed range of Multi-Purpose Community<br />

Centres to be established throughout the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

• To consolidate the urban structure of the district around the highest order centres by<br />

way of infill development and densification in Strategic Development Areas.<br />

• To establish a functional hierarchy of towns and settlements in the <strong>District</strong> based on the<br />

regional function and spatial distribution of these centres.<br />

LAND USE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LUMS)<br />

Land use management system is a permutation of tools and mechanisms developed together in<br />

order to manage, control, influence and regulate the use of land. This system includes the <strong>IDP</strong><br />

with spatial development framework as its component that scales down to a land use scheme<br />

and ultimately to the building plans. LUMS are put in place to effect a uniform system and<br />

procedures for land development and land use management and addresses the plethora and<br />

imbalances of the past.<br />

SDM has initiated a LUMS project for its local municipalities. The draft LUMS are in place.<br />

Promulgation of the LUMS has been hampered by the delay in the promulgation of the national<br />

land use management bill that provides for regulation of land use management.<br />

STATUS OF LAND USE MANAGEMENT SCHEMES IN SDM<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

Greater Tubatse LM<br />

Ephraim Mogale LM<br />

Elias Motsoaledi LM<br />

Fetakgomo LM<br />

Makhuduthamaga LM<br />

LAND USE SCHEME<br />

Draft Land Use Scheme; (Burgersford<br />

town planning Scheme ( adopted 2006))<br />

Draft Land Use Scheme<br />

Draft Land Use Scheme (Groblersdal<br />

Town planning Scheme (Adopted 2006))<br />

Draft Land Use Scheme<br />

Draft Land Use Scheme


436<br />

6.3. BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

INTEGRATED TRANSPORT PLAN (ITP)<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> undertook a project to update the Integrated Transport<br />

Plan (ITP) for its area of jurisdiction, whereby the final draft report was completed in March<br />

2007. The report is still pending the Council approval. The ITP was prepared, as required in<br />

terms of section 27 of the National Land Transport Transition Act, No.22 of 2000 (NLTTA), as<br />

amended. The ITP attends to the public and private modes of transport, infrastructure, facilities<br />

and services. The Integrated Transport Plan constitutes a transport sector input into the <strong>IDP</strong><br />

process.<br />

For implementing the NLTTA, the Minister of Transport published the minimum requirements for<br />

the preparation of the ITP (Government Gazette No. R25245 dated 1 August 2003). This<br />

publication provides for the minimum requirements for the structure and contents of the ITP<br />

document.<br />

A data collection process preceded the ITP. The aim of that process was to gain an idea of the<br />

current situation in the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) in terms of transportation utility.<br />

One of the data collection process is called the Current Public Transport Record (CPTR). The<br />

final updated CPTR report was completed in November 2006. This included surveys of taxi<br />

operations at taxi ranks.<br />

Subsequently, the Operating Licensing Strategy, Rationalization Plan and Public Transport Plan<br />

for the SDM were updated, and are components of the Integrated Transport Plan.<br />

Further research was done into road infrastructure development plans and operational plans,<br />

such as Road Safety, Travel Demand Management, freight and commodity flow data collection<br />

and demographic data. The ITP and Land Development Objectives should be complementary.<br />

The ITP indicates that SDM should focus its efforts and resources on the following strategic<br />

components of transportation:<br />

a) Capacity and Skills Development<br />

· Training of officials in integrated transportation planning and land-use planning<br />

· Recruitment of transport planners and engineers<br />

· Procurement of consulting engineering services for consistent and continuous advice<br />

and for undertaking ad hoc projects<br />

b) Addressing the Service Backlog


437<br />

· Motivate subsidized public transport coverage in the SDM with the objective of reducing<br />

the cost of travel<br />

· Install public transport infrastructure such as shelters, lay-bys and inter-modal facilities<br />

· Upgrade the road infrastructure and the streets between residential and business nodes,<br />

giving special attention to the Greater Tubatse Area.<br />

c) Travel Demand Management (TDM)<br />

· Manage congestion through TDM measures such as signalization, bus lanes, reversible<br />

lanes in urban areas and the upgrading of intersections<br />

· Develop a non-motorized transport plan and implement projects.<br />

d) Road Safety<br />

· Develop a Central Communications Centre for incident management<br />

· Perform road safety audits<br />

· Address hazardous locations<br />

· Motivate law enforcement at strategic locations<br />

e) Conduct Education and Communication Campaigns<br />

The way forward is to submit motivations for the prioritized projects in the Integrated Transport<br />

Plan (ITP) and the Integrated Development Plan (<strong>IDP</strong>). The construction and maintenance of<br />

public transport facilities and roads are in most cases labour-intensive, and are appropriate<br />

mechanisms to promote job creation.<br />

INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (IWMP)<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has developed the integrated Waste Management Plan<br />

that is waiting for approval by Council. The purpose of this Integrated Waste Management Plan<br />

(IWMP) is to enable <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> to progressively develop an Integrated Waste Management<br />

System (IWMS) capable of delivering waste management services to all households and<br />

businesses.<br />

Implementation requires that <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> move away from traditional “end of pipe” solutions<br />

(the dominant practice in South Africa) that focus on waste after it has been generated:<br />

Collection – Transport – Land-filling.<br />

National policy requires municipalities to implement an IWMS where the focus is on prevention<br />

and minimization of waste, recycling of waste and treatment that is able to reduce the potential


438<br />

harmful impacts of waste. Only after these efforts, should remaining waste be disposed of at a<br />

landfill.<br />

Integrated Waste Management is based upon waste generators acting responsibly by<br />

separating their waste at source (the point of generation) and then properly recycling, storing<br />

and disposing of the different parts of the waste. Government must ensure that there is waste<br />

management service delivery system providing a network of collection and disposal options so<br />

that generators can effectively exercise their responsibilities. Thus, Integrated Waste<br />

Management combines personal responsibility with government service delivery. Appropriate<br />

education and training is required for everyone.<br />

A key element of the IWMS is home use of organic waste (composting or animal feed) as this<br />

eliminates the need for collection, transport, treatment and disposal of as much as 50% of the<br />

waste stream.<br />

Non-organic recyclable material, when separated at source has higher value, is more easily<br />

routed to end users and can be recovered at a far higher efficiency rate than when it is<br />

salvaged at a landfill site. In the IWMS will create new forms of safe employment with better<br />

remuneration while education and training enables salvagers to take advantage of new career<br />

path.<br />

Alternative solutions<br />

The Feasibility Study describes two options for the waste management system in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong>.<br />

Only option 2 contains key elements for an IWMS. Option 1 presents a strategic with “end of<br />

pipe” services and shows the potential costs of waste management in <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> without<br />

incorporating integrated strategies.<br />

An overview of all options is shown in the table 78 below.<br />

Table 101: Strategy Options<br />

Core elements Waste Management Strategy Integrated strategies<br />

Collection Transport Disposal Recycling Treatment


439<br />

Option 1 House to<br />

house<br />

service<br />

provided by<br />

the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Operation of<br />

collecting<br />

points and<br />

transport with<br />

trucks and<br />

donkey cards<br />

(rural areas)<br />

provided by<br />

the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Rehabilitation<br />

and/or operation<br />

of 7 landfill sites<br />

according to<br />

DWAF’s MR<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

and closure of<br />

15 dumpsite<br />

On the<br />

landfills by<br />

private<br />

contractors<br />

No<br />

composting<br />

MBWT may<br />

be<br />

considered<br />

Overview of feasibility options<br />

These projects have two fundamental economic flaws:<br />

Income is derived from the sale of salvaged recyclables only. The value gained by the<br />

municipality in reduced land fill costs is not seen as linked to the project and the salvagers do<br />

not receive any portion of this value.<br />

In end of pipe salvaging, waste is first mixed at source and then transported by the municipality<br />

to the land fill where it then has to be separated and transported once again.<br />

The added costs significantly reduce the revenue available to the salvagers.<br />

INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (IEMP)<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has drafted the Integrated Environmental Management<br />

Plan that is waiting to be approved by Council. The Integrated Environmental Management Plan<br />

(IEMP) is a plan with a holistic framework that can be embraced by all sectors of society for the<br />

assessment and management of environmental impacts and aspects associated with an activity<br />

for each stage of the active life cycle, taking into consideration a broad definition of environment<br />

and with the overall aim of promoting sustainable development.<br />

The founding principles of the IEMP are the following:<br />

· Integrated approach.<br />

· Informed decision making.<br />

· Holistic decision making<br />

· Alternative options.


440<br />

· Continual improvement.<br />

· Community empowerment.<br />

· Equity.<br />

· Accountability and responsibility.<br />

· Adaptation.<br />

· Dispute Resolution.<br />

· Global Responsibilities.<br />

· Environmental Justice.<br />

· Institutional Co-ordination.<br />

· Polluter Pays.<br />

This document is not yet approved by Council. To avoid long term accumulated negative effect,<br />

the <strong>District</strong> has started implementing some of the recommendations mentioned in the<br />

document. The plan is developed from the involvement of interested and affected parties as<br />

well as the responsible authority in ensuring the protection of its citizens while taking forward<br />

economic development. It should be emphasized that consultation with the other regulatory<br />

authority and sectors is pivotal in ensuring association with the plan for proper integration.<br />

The SDM <strong>IDP</strong>, Limpopo State of the Environment Report, Limpopo Employment, Growth and<br />

Development Plan (LEGDP) and the <strong>IDP</strong>s of the five Local municipalities (which are under the<br />

direct control of the <strong>District</strong>) provided the framework for the development of this three-year<br />

(2001-2010) Integrated Environmental Management Plan (IEMP).<br />

The development of this plan was based on the following protocol:<br />

- Identification of the environmental activities and priorities performed by sectors of the<br />

municipality and its five local municipalities.<br />

- Clustering of common functions.<br />

- Setting of goals and objectives.<br />

- Documentation of strategies.<br />

- Identification and development of the environmental programmes.<br />

- Development of projects.<br />

- Development of the management strategy for all the levels of the projects.<br />

- Identification of role players.<br />

This IEMP has set the basis upon which the development of the SDM environmental policy and<br />

the SDM State of Environmental Report is formulated. This policy will be important in guiding<br />

the other ecosystems plans.<br />

AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (AQMP)


441<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) in line with the Department of Economic<br />

Development, Environment and Tourism in the Limpopo Province (LEDET) has developed a<br />

Draft Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the SDM.<br />

The overall goal with the Plan is to manage, reduce and/or eliminate the generation and<br />

significant negative environmental impact(s) of all known air pollutants in their area of<br />

jurisdiction.<br />

The AQMP will be used to reform the by-laws regulating air quality in order to protect the quality<br />

of the air in the SDM and to minimize the impact of air pollution emissions on neighbouring<br />

districts, yet allowing ecologically sustainable and justifiable economic and social development.<br />

By compiling an AQMP, the SDM will comply with the relevant requirements of the National<br />

Environmental Management Air Quality Act 39 of 2004.<br />

The object of the National Environmental Management Air Quality Act 39 of 2004 is;<br />

(A) To protect the environment by providing reasonable measures for –<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

(B)<br />

The protection and enhancement of the quality of air in the<br />

Republic;<br />

The prevention of air pollution and ecological degradation; and<br />

Securing ecologically sustainable development while promoting justifiable economic<br />

and social development; and<br />

Generally to give effect to Section 24(b) of the Constitution in order to enhance the<br />

quality of ambient air for the sake of securing an environment that is not harmful to the<br />

health and well-being of people.<br />

The specific objectives of generating this Plan are to:<br />

· Ensure the identification of significant air pollutants;<br />

· Control the emission of air pollutants;<br />

· Implement planned Air Quality Management strategies;<br />

· Achieve acceptable air quality levels throughout SDM;<br />

· Promote a clean and healthy environment for all citizens within SDM;<br />

· Minimize the negative impacts of air pollution on health and the environment; and<br />

· Promote the reduction of greenhouse gases so as to support the district's climate<br />

change protection programme.<br />

WATER SERVICES DEVELOPMENT PLAN (WSDP)


442<br />

Residential consumers of water:<br />

· 42% of Rural consumer units are below the RDP standard;<br />

· 100% of Rural farmland units are estimated to be below the RDP standard;<br />

· Although no reliable information is available it is estimated that 90% of rural scattered<br />

and 2<br />

· 0% of rural dense consumer units are below the RDP standard.<br />

· Residential consumers of sanitation<br />

The following situation exists within rural areas:<br />

· Rural Dense: 40% below the RDP standard;<br />

· Rural Village: 75% below the RDP standard;<br />

· Rural Scattered: 90% below the RDP standard;<br />

· Rural Farmland: 95% below the RDP standard.<br />

Future trends and goals:<br />

· The goal of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> WSA is to provide everyone with an adequate and reliable<br />

supply of water and to manage the water supply services in an affordable, equitable and<br />

sustainable manner.<br />

· The target is that 30% of the RDP backlog in water supplies and 50% O and M<br />

deficiencies are to be eliminated by Dec 2008. 100% coverage should be achieved in<br />

2012.<br />

· The sanitation target is to eliminate 30% of the backlog by 2010, 50% by 2015 and<br />

100% by 2016.<br />

· VIP latrines (properly designed and constructed including fly-screens) will be the<br />

standard solution to sanitation for most consumers outside the defined Growth Points,<br />

including low cost housing schemes.<br />

· The RDP backlog and O and M deficiencies in water-borne sanitation systems are to be<br />

eliminated by Dec 2008 and on-site dry installations, VIP latrines, are to be provided to<br />

all households by Dec 2016.<br />

· On-site monitoring of Groundwater is to be instituted on all Groundwater Supply<br />

Schemes that have on-site sanitation by 2015.<br />

Strategic Gap Analysis<br />

· Monitoring of water supply quality is to be introduced on all schemes. Data to be<br />

collected on a Sub-Scheme basis. Little or no data is currently available.


443<br />

· Ground water quality is to be implemented on all groundwater schemes where there is<br />

on-site sanitation (dry or wet). No data is currently available.<br />

· Lack of a single data base for water schemes.<br />

· Groundwater data being held up due to non – submission of GRIP data base.<br />

· Transfer of Schemes and ex. DWAF staff to WSA and local Wasps is proving to be<br />

problematic, due in part to an oversupply of unskilled operational personnel on the one<br />

hand and a shortage of skilled personnel, engineers, technicians and scientists on the<br />

other.<br />

· Shortage of engineers and technicians to design, implement, manage, monitor and<br />

evaluate schemes.<br />

Implementation Strategy<br />

· An O and M budget allocation for on-going refurbishment and defective and badly<br />

maintained infrastructure has been allowed.<br />

· Focus will be placed on labour-intensive construction methods for refurbishment,<br />

maintenance and water supply projects.<br />

· A water demand management programme is to be initiated.<br />

· The sanitation programme to be increased to meet the sanitation targets of 13 068 units<br />

per year.<br />

· Abstraction rates and water quality to be monitored for all groundwater resources.<br />

· Effective control of discharges from all WWTW within SDM to be developed and<br />

initiated.<br />

· A management model to be developed for the 605 villages, over 40 sub-water scheme<br />

areas and thousands of boreholes within the SDM. The fundamental approach for SDM<br />

must be decided within the Section 78 process.<br />

DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN (DMP)<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted the Disaster Management Plan in 2007 and<br />

reviewed it in 2010. The main purpose of the Disaster Management Plan (DMP) is inter alia to<br />

implement appropriate disaster risk reduction measures to reduce the vulnerability of<br />

communities and infrastructure at risk. The DMP is in line with national policy (National<br />

Disaster Management Framework), which requires the following:<br />

· The compilation of a Disaster Management Framework (policy).<br />

· The execution of a detailed disaster hazard, vulnerability and risk assessment.<br />

· The compilation of disaster risk reduction measures.<br />

· The compilation of appropriate Standing Operating Procedures (SOP’s).<br />

· Establishment of a <strong>District</strong> Disaster Management Centre (DDMC).


444<br />

· Establishment of a Disaster Management Advisory Forum.<br />

· Capacity Building, training and awareness programmes.<br />

Hence, to accommodate the above-mentioned requirements, the DMP for <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> (SDM) comprises various plans, namely;<br />

· <strong>District</strong> Disaster Management Framework (policy).<br />

· Disaster Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Plan.<br />

· Disaster Risk Reduction Plan.<br />

· Disaster Response and Recovery Plan (SOP’s and checklists).<br />

· <strong>District</strong> Disaster Management Centre Plan.<br />

· Guidelines to establish the Disaster Management Advisory Forum and Volunteer<br />

Contingent<br />

6.4. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />

LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted its strategy in 2004 and reviewed it in 2007.<br />

This plan is based on identified development needs, opportunities and comparative advantages<br />

of the area, and guides the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> to create and facilitate economic development,<br />

unlock the latent economic development potential, encourage private sector investment and job<br />

creation.<br />

The plan is to be used as a tool by the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> to ensure the dedicated and effective<br />

utilization of available resources to promote local economic development in a proactive and<br />

dynamic manner.<br />

Implementation of this LED strategy urges (1) the need to establish the proposed institutional<br />

drivers. These establishments need to be accompanied by (2) a political ambition to ensure<br />

success. This ambition can be initiated and developed through the inclusion of all interested<br />

and affected parties, stakeholders and role players during the planning and implementation<br />

phases. By including all of these (3) a political will, interest and communication are stimulated<br />

which, all together will contribute to the success of the strategy.<br />

Another important aspect for successful implementation is (4) to ensure that all involved take<br />

ownership of the programmes and projects. Without the taking of ownership of a programme<br />

and/or project, success cannot be seen at the end of the tunnel. It is also important (5) to<br />

incorporate the monitoring and evaluation elements of the strategy into the performance


445<br />

management system of the <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>, to ensure accountability and<br />

responsibility for implementation and eradicate potential conflicts.<br />

6.5. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK<br />

Introduction<br />

The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted its Performance Management<br />

system in 2008 and reviewed it in 2009/10 financial year. The <strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> has institutionalized the Culture of Performance Management among<br />

its Political Office Bearers, Councillors and its Administration. This has ensured<br />

that the service delivery is administered in an economical, effective, efficient and<br />

accountable manner.<br />

Performance Management System and the <strong>IDP</strong> process are seamlessly integrated. Whereas<br />

the <strong>IDP</strong> fulfills the planning stage, Performance Management in turn fulfills the implementation,<br />

management, monitoring and evaluation of the <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />

It is critical to note that PMS should provide a mechanism and facilitate an increased<br />

accountability between the following role players:<br />

· The Community and the Municipal Council<br />

· The Political and Administrative components of SDM.<br />

· Each department and the office of the Municipal Manager<br />

Furthermore, PMS does facilitate learning and improvements by outlining the approaches bring<br />

the desired impact to enable SDM improve delivery. Also that PMS forms the basis for<br />

Monitoring, Evaluation and Improving <strong>IDP</strong> implementation.<br />

PMS provides early warning diagnostic signals of the potential risks that are likely linked to<br />

implementation of the <strong>IDP</strong>. Such timeous information on risks enables facilitation of<br />

interventions.<br />

Principles of PMS<br />

The following principles have successfully been the core foundation of PMS processes:<br />

Table 102: Principles of PMS


446<br />

Principle<br />

Ownership and Support<br />

Participatory<br />

Linkage/Integration<br />

Compatibility<br />

Alignment<br />

Fair and objective<br />

Decision making<br />

Politically Driven<br />

Roles and Responsibilities<br />

Intervention<br />

The PMS should be owned by the municipality<br />

and supported by other spheres of government.<br />

The system must place the SDM community at<br />

the centre of local government processes<br />

Performance Management system must be<br />

linked to the <strong>IDP</strong> Framework. PMS and <strong>IDP</strong><br />

complement each other, therefore PMS<br />

planning phase must occur within the<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget planning phase.<br />

The PMS must be developed and implemented<br />

within available capacity and resources. It must<br />

be user-friendly enabling the municipality to<br />

manage it within its existing institutional and<br />

financial resources.<br />

The system must align to other municipal<br />

activities and allow for joint responsibility and<br />

accountability.<br />

Performance management will be founded on<br />

fairness and objectivity in the recognition of<br />

poor or good performance.<br />

PMS decision making processes will not be<br />

used to victimize or give an unfair advantage to<br />

an individual or group of people.<br />

The political principals must buy in and<br />

participate and take a lead in development and<br />

implementation of the system.<br />

The following are Roles and Responsibilities of various stakeholders critical to the<br />

implementation of PMS and are outlined as follows:<br />

Table 103: Roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders in PMS<br />

Stakehold Planning Implementation Monitoring & <strong>Review</strong>ing Reporting<br />

ers<br />

Analysis<br />

Executive 1. Facilitate<br />

1. Receive monthly 1. <strong>Review</strong> 1. Report on<br />

Mayor development<br />

reports on performance organizational<br />

of <strong>IDP</strong> and<br />

implementation of of MM performance to the<br />

PMS<br />

PMS<br />

quarterly Council<br />

Municipal 1. Assign 1. Oversee 1. Evaluate reports 1. Use audit 1. Submit


447<br />

Manager overall<br />

planning of<br />

PMS<br />

2. Manage<br />

development<br />

of<br />

departmental<br />

managers<br />

performance<br />

management<br />

systems,<br />

3. Manages<br />

development<br />

of<br />

subordinate’s<br />

performance<br />

management<br />

systems.<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> 1. Co-ordinate<br />

COMMITT and manage<br />

EE PMS<br />

2. Report to<br />

Council on<br />

PMS<br />

3. Assign PMS<br />

responsibility<br />

to MM.<br />

Staff 1. Participate<br />

in developing<br />

Departmental<br />

plans.<br />

2. Participate<br />

in developing<br />

own<br />

performance<br />

measurement<br />

implementation<br />

of PMS<br />

alignment with<br />

other systems.<br />

2. Manage<br />

implementation<br />

of subordinate<br />

performance<br />

measurement<br />

systems.<br />

1. Execute<br />

individual plans<br />

from HODs.<br />

2. Propose<br />

adjustment on the<br />

basis of report.<br />

3. Identify<br />

underperformance<br />

in respect of<br />

department and<br />

employee<br />

performance.<br />

1. Report on<br />

performance to line<br />

managers.<br />

report to<br />

evaluate<br />

performance.<br />

2. Assess<br />

performance<br />

according to<br />

plans.<br />

3. Propose<br />

measures for<br />

improvement.<br />

4. Assess<br />

subordinates<br />

performance<br />

quarterly.<br />

1. Receive<br />

reports from<br />

internal audit<br />

committee.<br />

2. Make<br />

recommendati<br />

ons based on<br />

the reports.<br />

1. Participate<br />

in review of<br />

departmental<br />

plans and<br />

own<br />

performance<br />

and make<br />

necessary<br />

adjustment.<br />

Performance<br />

reports to:<br />

-Council<br />

-Council<br />

Committee<br />

- Community, on<br />

annual basis.<br />

1. Receive<br />

quarterly and<br />

annual reports and<br />

make<br />

recommendations<br />

to management.<br />

1. Submit reports<br />

on performance to<br />

line managers.<br />

2. Receive reports<br />

on<br />

own<br />

performance from<br />

Departmental<br />

managers.


448<br />

Council<br />

Committe<br />

e<br />

Council<br />

Internal<br />

Audit<br />

Committe<br />

e<br />

1. Make inputs<br />

in divisional<br />

plans<br />

2. Responsible<br />

for public<br />

participation<br />

1. Assign PMS<br />

responsibility<br />

to <strong>IDP</strong><br />

committee.<br />

2. Adopt PMS<br />

Framework,<br />

Indicator and<br />

Set targets.<br />

3. Ensure PMS<br />

is in line with<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

1. Appoint Audit<br />

Committee.<br />

2. Monitor<br />

Municipal<br />

Performance.<br />

1. Develops<br />

reporting<br />

procedures.<br />

1. <strong>Review</strong><br />

divisional<br />

plans<br />

2. Participate<br />

in quarterly<br />

review of<br />

committees.<br />

1. <strong>Review</strong><br />

Municipal<br />

Performance<br />

reports and<br />

make<br />

recommendati<br />

ons on<br />

performance<br />

of<br />

departments,<br />

MM, and<br />

Executive<br />

Mayor, and<br />

Executive<br />

Committee.<br />

Assess:<br />

1.<br />

Functionality<br />

of PMS.<br />

2. PMS<br />

complies with<br />

the Act.<br />

3. Reliability<br />

in measuring<br />

performance.<br />

4. Audit<br />

performance<br />

measurement<br />

of<br />

municipality.<br />

1. Receive<br />

departmental<br />

reports.<br />

2. Receive<br />

performance<br />

reports from MM.<br />

3. Make<br />

recommendations<br />

to council.<br />

1. Submit annual<br />

report to Auditor<br />

General/ MEC.<br />

2. Receive reports<br />

from MM.<br />

3. Receive reports<br />

from performance<br />

audit committee.<br />

1. Submit reports<br />

to performance<br />

audit committee,


449<br />

Audit<br />

Committe<br />

e<br />

Auditor<br />

General<br />

1. Develop<br />

reporting<br />

procedures and<br />

formats.<br />

2. Develop code of<br />

conduct for its<br />

members.<br />

1. Ensures legal<br />

compliance.<br />

1. Receives<br />

reports from<br />

the internal<br />

audit<br />

committee.<br />

2. Make<br />

comments on<br />

reports.<br />

1. Submit reports<br />

to the council.<br />

1. Receives<br />

annual reports.<br />

2. Represented in<br />

the council when<br />

annual report is<br />

adopted.<br />

Accountability structure during the review process<br />

Table 104: Accountability structure during the review process<br />

Lines of Accountability<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Role/Input<br />

Supervisor and Municipal Manager<br />

<strong>Review</strong> performance of employees reporting<br />

directly to them (quarterly)<br />

Line/Functional Managers <strong>Review</strong> performance of their respective<br />

functional areas(Monthly)<br />

Standing/Portfolio Committees<br />

Executive Management (Section 57)<br />

Teams<br />

Executive or Mayoral<br />

Council<br />

The Public<br />

Manage and review performance of sectors<br />

and function respective to their portfolios.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> performance of the organization<br />

constantly(monthly)<br />

<strong>Review</strong> performance of the administration<br />

<strong>Review</strong> the performance of the Municipal<br />

Council, Its Committees and the<br />

Administration.<br />

<strong>Review</strong> the performance of the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

and Public representatives (Councilors).


450<br />

It is critical to note that Organizational Performance is integrally linked to that of the staff and<br />

Council performance. The two cannot exist independently without concerted and aligned PMS<br />

processes. The relationship between staff performance and Council performance starts from<br />

the planning, implementation, monitoring up to review of PMS.<br />

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION FRAMEWORK<br />

The public participation policy framework has been adopted by Council and is reviewed<br />

annually. The objectives of the policy are as follows;<br />

· Meet the legal requirements around community participation that are spelled out in the<br />

Municipal systems Act No. 32 of 2000.<br />

· Build an open, transparent and accountable system of governance.<br />

· Develop a culture of community participation through creating conditions for local<br />

communities to participate in the affairs of the municipality.<br />

· Assist vulnerable groups to participate effectively in the system of local government.<br />

· Provide clear, sufficient and timeous information concerning community participation to<br />

communities.<br />

· Communicate decisions of Council.<br />

· Communicate public notices of meetings for communities in a manner that promotes<br />

optimal public participation.<br />

· Set up systems and mechanisms that will ensure compliance with regulations and<br />

guidelines that may be issued from National or Provincial Government.<br />

The Public Participation policy framework spells out the roles and responsibilities of;<br />

· Council,<br />

· Executive Mayor,<br />

· The Speaker,<br />

· Portfolio and Standing Committees,<br />

· Ward Councilors,<br />

· Management and Administration,<br />

· The Public (Ward Committees) and<br />

· Community Development Workers<br />

6.6. FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

The following budget related policies were also reviewed alongside the budget:<br />

1. Tariff policy and structure<br />

2. Indigent policy


451<br />

3. Free Basic Water policy<br />

4. Credit control and debt collection policy<br />

5. Investment and cash management policy<br />

6. Asset management policy<br />

7. Funding and reserve policy<br />

Water and Sanitation Tariff Policy <strong>2013</strong><br />

Purpose:<br />

· To set clear guidelines in the identification of responsibility for the setting and<br />

implementation of a tariff policy for the <strong>Municipality</strong>;<br />

· To set guidelines for the identification of different categories of users;<br />

· To set guidelines for the determination of tariffs for the different categories of users and<br />

services rendered;<br />

· The policy will further lay down the broad principles, which will result in the adoption of a<br />

by-law for the implementation and enforcement of the Tariff Policy. Service tariffs<br />

imposed by the municipality shall be viewed as user charges and shall not be viewed as<br />

taxes.<br />

Scope of the policy<br />

• The policy is applicable to water and sanitation services provided by <strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

• This policy is also applicable to all sundry tariffs as provided for in the Schedule of<br />

Tariffs of the <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

Free Basic Water Policy<br />

The purpose of the policy is to outline the Free Basic Water Policy for SDM area of jurisdiction.<br />

As part of government strategy to alleviate poverty in South Africa a policy for the provision of a<br />

free basic level of services has been introduced. In response to this commitment, the<br />

Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWA) commenced the implementation of phase 1 of<br />

a national free basic water strategy in February 2001. The free basic water policy is not new to<br />

the South African water sector. Indeed, in terms of the Water Services Act 108 of 1997,<br />

provision was made for those people who cannot afford to pay for a basic water supply.<br />

The primary intention of the policy is to ensure that no one is completely denied access to a<br />

water supply because they are unable to pay for the water service. Underlying this policy is a


452<br />

recognition that the supply of water at a ‘basic’ level assists in alleviating poverty, improves<br />

community health and frees women from time wasted on carrying water.<br />

Indigent Policy <strong>2013</strong><br />

Objective<br />

Because of the level of unemployment and subsequent poverty in the municipal area, there are<br />

households which are unable to pay for normal municipal services. The municipality therefore<br />

adopts this indigence management policy to ensure that these households have access to at<br />

least basic municipal services, and is guided in the formulation of this policy by the national<br />

government’s policy in this regard.<br />

Criteria for identification as indigent:<br />

- Households where verified total gross monthly income of all occupants over 18 years of<br />

age does not exceed the pension grant as determined by the government.<br />

- The threshold for qualifying as an indigent in a single household where more than two<br />

occupants receives old age pension grants shall be the twice old age grant determined<br />

by the government.<br />

- Any occupant or resident of the single household referred to above does not own any<br />

property in addition to the property in respect of which indigent support is provided<br />

- The account of a deceased estate may be subsidised if the surviving spouse or<br />

dependents of the deceased who occupy the property, also apply and qualify for<br />

indigent support.<br />

- For a household to qualify for subsidies or rebates on the major service charges (see<br />

part 3 below), the registered indigent must be the fulltime occupant of the property<br />

concerned, may not own any other property, whether in or out of the municipal area.<br />

- Child welfare grants are exempted as part of total income per household as the child is<br />

under 18 years of age.<br />

Application of the policy<br />

· The subsidies on the specified service charges will be determined as part of each<br />

annual budget and in terms of the municipality’s policies on tariffs<br />

· In respect of water, a 100% subsidy up to 6kl per household per month including basic<br />

charge will apply, however, if consumption exceeds 6kl per metering period (month) the<br />

consumer will be charged at normal tariffs for actual consumption on the quantity<br />

exceeding 6kl plus basic charge.<br />

· In respect of sewerage charges, the relief granted shall not be less than a rebate of 50%<br />

on the monthly amount billed for the service concerned.


453<br />

Credit Control and Debt Collection Policy<br />

Objectives:<br />

‣ The Council of SDM, in adopting this policy on credit control and debt collection,<br />

recognises its constitutional obligations to develop the local economy and to provide<br />

acceptable services to its residents.<br />

‣ It simultaneously acknowledges that it cannot fulfil these constitutional obligations<br />

unless it exacts payment for the services which it provides and for the taxes which it<br />

legitimately levies – in full from those residents who can afford to pay, and in<br />

accordance with its indigency relief measures for those who have registered as<br />

indigents in terms of the council’s approved indigency management policy.<br />

‣ Ensure that all money due and payable to SDM in respect of fees for services,<br />

surcharges on such fees, charges, tariffs, interest which had accrued on any amounts<br />

due and payable in respect of the foregoing and any collection charges are collected<br />

efficiently and promptly.<br />

Funding and Reserve Policy<br />

The funding and reserve policy is aimed at ensuring that the municipality has the sufficient and<br />

cost effective funding in order to achieve its objectives through the implementation of its<br />

operating and capital budgets. This policy aims to set guidelines towards ensuring financial<br />

viability over both the short and long term which includes reserves requirements.<br />

The policy shall apply to the Council and all officials who have formal, administrative duty to<br />

prepare, manage and control the municipality’s budget and expenditure.<br />

Asset Management Policy<br />

The objectives of Asset Management Policy can be summarised as follows:<br />

- To ensure effective and efficient control, utilization, safeguarding and management of<br />

SDM’s property, plant and equipment<br />

- To ensure that asset managers are aware of their responsibilities in regards to property,<br />

plant and equipment<br />

- To set out the standards of physical management, recording and internal controls to<br />

ensure property, plant and equipment are safeguarded against loss or utilization<br />

- To specify the process required before expenditure on property , plant and equipment in<br />

SDM including:


454<br />

• The criteria to be met before expenditure can be capitalised as an item of property,<br />

plants and equipment<br />

• The criteria for determining initial costs of different items of property, plant and<br />

equipment<br />

• Classification of property, plant and equipment<br />

The utilization and management of property, plant and equipment is the prime mechanism by<br />

which a municipality can fulfil its constitutional mandates for: delivery of sustainable services,<br />

social and economic development, promoting safe and healthy environment, providing the basic<br />

needs to the community.<br />

Investment and cash management policy<br />

The Council of SDM is the trustee of public revenues, which it collects, and it therefore has an<br />

obligation to the community to ensure that the municipality’s cash resources are managed<br />

effectively and efficiently. Therefore the council has to invest the revenues knowledgeably and<br />

judiciously. The aim of the policy is therefore to gain an optimal return on investment, without<br />

incurring undue risks, during those periods when cash revenues are not needed for capital or<br />

operational purposes. The effectiveness of the policy is dependent on the SDM’s cash<br />

management program which must identify the amounts surplus to the municipality’s needs. All<br />

monies due to SDM must be collected as soon as possible, either on or immediately after the<br />

due date and banked on a daily basis.<br />

Supply Chain Management Policy<br />

All procurement policies (including those addressing preferential procurement), procedures and<br />

practices must be consistent with legislative requirements, in particular part 1 of chapter 11 and<br />

other provision of the MFMA. The SCM policy is implemented in the context of the MFMA of<br />

2003 and SCM regulations, read together with the Constitution, preferential procurement policy<br />

framework Act of 2000, and the BBBE Act of 2003. The principal objective of the policy is to<br />

provide guidelines, governing processes and procedures within the supply chain management:<br />

- Procuring goods and services<br />

- Disposing goods, assets and immovable property no longer needed<br />

- Selecting contractors to provide assistance in the provision of municipal services other<br />

than that where Chapter 8 of the Municipal Systems Act applies


455<br />

ANNEXURE A<br />

SERVICE DELIVERY AND BUDGET<br />

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SDBIP) <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong>


456<br />

SERVICE DELIVERY AND BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION PLAN <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> FOR<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />

Section <strong>14</strong> (2) and (3) Municipal Budget and Reporting Regulations 2008 states:<br />

“when complying with section 68 of the Act, the Municipal manager must submit the draft<br />

Municipal Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan to the Mayor together with annual<br />

budget to be considered by the Mayor for tabling in terms of section 16 (2) of the Act”<br />

It further states:<br />

“for effective planning and implementation of the annual budget, the draft municipal service<br />

delivery and budget implementation plan may form part of the budget documentation and be<br />

tabled in the municipal council if so recommended by budget steering committee”<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has prepared the draft SDBIP for <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> in line with the<br />

Local Government Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003 (Act no.56 of 2003)<br />

The SDBIP has been prepared in line with the Local Government National Key Performance<br />

Areas as follows:<br />

· Basic Service Delivery and Infrastructure<br />

· Financial Viability<br />

· Local Economic Development<br />

· Good Governance and Public Participation<br />

· Institutional Development and organisational transformation<br />

· Spatial Rationale<br />

Section 9 (2) (a) of the Municipal Planning and Performance Management Regulations, 2001<br />

states:<br />

“In setting key performance indicators, a municipality must ensure that<br />

(a) Communities are involved<br />

(b) Key performance indicators inform the indicators set for<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

All its administrative units and employees; and<br />

Every municipal entity and service provider with whom the municipality has<br />

entered into service delivery agreement.


457<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

01/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

02/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

03/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Bursarie<br />

s<br />

Experien<br />

tial<br />

Learning<br />

Internshi<br />

ps<br />

To<br />

facilitat<br />

e skills<br />

develo<br />

pment<br />

initiativ<br />

es and<br />

create<br />

conduc<br />

ive<br />

enviro<br />

nment<br />

for<br />

learnin<br />

g<br />

Bursaryholders<br />

Graduates<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

bursaries<br />

awarded<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

experient<br />

ial<br />

learners<br />

accomm<br />

odated<br />

Number<br />

of interns<br />

engaged<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

54<br />

Learn<br />

ers in<br />

differe<br />

nt field<br />

of<br />

studie<br />

s<br />

award<br />

ed<br />

bursar<br />

ies.<br />

19<br />

experi<br />

ential<br />

learne<br />

rs<br />

10<br />

interns<br />

10<br />

bursaries<br />

(5<br />

internal +<br />

5<br />

external)<br />

10<br />

learners<br />

(2Human<br />

Resourc<br />

es, 2 IT,<br />

2<br />

Technica<br />

l<br />

Services,<br />

2<br />

Finance<br />

And 2<br />

Commun<br />

ications)<br />

0 5 5 0 Memo<br />

of<br />

approv<br />

ed<br />

bursar<br />

y<br />

holder<br />

s and<br />

award<br />

letters<br />

to<br />

applica<br />

nts<br />

0 5 5 0 learner<br />

ship<br />

contra<br />

cts<br />

30 0 30 0 0 mentor<br />

ship<br />

reports<br />

R 4<br />

000<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Capable<br />

workforc<br />

e<br />

improve<br />

d<br />

employa<br />

bility<br />

improve<br />

d<br />

employa<br />

bility


458<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

04/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

05/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

06/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Learners<br />

hip<br />

program<br />

me<br />

Recogniti<br />

on of<br />

Prior<br />

Learning<br />

(RPL)<br />

Adult<br />

Educatio<br />

n and<br />

Training<br />

(AET)<br />

qualificatio<br />

n<br />

qualificatio<br />

n<br />

qualificatio<br />

n<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Percenta<br />

ge of<br />

learnersh<br />

ip<br />

program<br />

mes<br />

impleme<br />

nted<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

employe<br />

es<br />

subjecte<br />

d to RPL<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

employe<br />

es<br />

subjecte<br />

d to AET<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

178<br />

learne<br />

rs<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

100% 10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Annual<br />

Trainin<br />

g<br />

Report<br />

50 0 25 25 0 Annual<br />

Trainin<br />

g<br />

Report<br />

50 0 50 0 0 Annual<br />

Trainin<br />

g<br />

Report<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

capable<br />

workforc<br />

e<br />

improve<br />

d<br />

employa<br />

bility<br />

literacy<br />

and<br />

numerac<br />

y


459<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

07/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

08/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

(Skills<br />

Program<br />

me)<br />

Skills<br />

Indaba<br />

certificate<br />

of<br />

competenc<br />

e<br />

training<br />

plan<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

percenta<br />

ge skills<br />

program<br />

me for<br />

employe<br />

es<br />

impleme<br />

nted<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

achieve<br />

ment for<br />

undertaki<br />

ng skills<br />

indaba<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

100%<br />

skills<br />

program<br />

me<br />

impleme<br />

nted<br />

0% 100%<br />

skills<br />

indaba<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

(1.conce<br />

pt<br />

documen<br />

-25%,<br />

2.stakeh<br />

older<br />

mobilisati<br />

on-25%,<br />

3.indaba<br />

logistics-<br />

50%)<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Annual<br />

Trainin<br />

g<br />

Report<br />

Exit<br />

report<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

improve<br />

d<br />

producti<br />

vity<br />

informed<br />

public


460<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

09/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

10/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

11/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Occup<br />

ational<br />

Health<br />

and<br />

Safety<br />

(OHS)<br />

Workplac<br />

e Skills<br />

Plan(WS<br />

P)/Annua<br />

l Training<br />

(ATR)<br />

Occupati<br />

onal<br />

Health<br />

and<br />

Safety<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

sound<br />

knowle<br />

dge<br />

base<br />

and<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

To<br />

promot<br />

e a<br />

healthy<br />

and<br />

safe<br />

workin<br />

g<br />

enviro<br />

nment<br />

WSP<br />

ATR<br />

Healthy<br />

work<br />

spaces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

WSP<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

compilati<br />

on of<br />

ATR<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

review of<br />

OHS<br />

Policy<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

establish<br />

ment of<br />

Safety<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

WSP<br />

submit<br />

ted<br />

2011/<br />

2012<br />

ATR<br />

submit<br />

ted<br />

100% (1.<br />

data<br />

gathering<br />

-50%, 2.<br />

compilati<br />

on-20%,<br />

3.<br />

consultat<br />

ion-25%,<br />

4.<br />

submissi<br />

on-5%)<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100% 0<br />

%<br />

100% 10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100% 10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0 Proof<br />

of<br />

service<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

service<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resoluti<br />

on<br />

Commi<br />

ttee<br />

establi<br />

shmen<br />

t report<br />

R<br />

600<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

enhance<br />

d<br />

planning<br />

improve<br />

d<br />

producti<br />

vity<br />

institutio<br />

nalised<br />

safety<br />

culture<br />

institutio<br />

nalised<br />

safety<br />

culture


461<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

Committ<br />

ees<br />

es<br />

ODT/0<br />

12/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

13/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Emplo<br />

yee<br />

Assista<br />

nce<br />

Progra<br />

mme<br />

(EAP)<br />

Compen<br />

sation for<br />

Occupati<br />

onal<br />

Injuries<br />

and<br />

Disease<br />

Act<br />

(COIDA)<br />

EAP<br />

Framewo<br />

rk<br />

To<br />

promot<br />

e a<br />

healthy<br />

and<br />

safe<br />

workin<br />

g<br />

enviro<br />

nment<br />

To<br />

promot<br />

e<br />

employ<br />

ee<br />

health<br />

and<br />

wellne<br />

Healthy<br />

work<br />

spaces<br />

EAP<br />

Framework<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

awarene<br />

ss<br />

campaig<br />

ns<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of drills<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

%<br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

EAP<br />

Framewo<br />

rk<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

4 1 1 1 1 quarter<br />

ly<br />

reports<br />

4 1 1 1 1 quarter<br />

ly<br />

reports<br />

100% 10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0 0 0 Counci<br />

l<br />

resoluti<br />

on<br />

770<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

institutio<br />

nalised<br />

safety<br />

culture<br />

institutio<br />

nalised<br />

safety<br />

culture<br />

sound<br />

administ<br />

ration


462<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

<strong>14</strong>/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

15/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

16/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

17/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Labour<br />

Relatio<br />

ns<br />

EAP<br />

Committ<br />

ees<br />

EAP<br />

Training<br />

EAP<br />

Reportin<br />

g<br />

Local<br />

Labour<br />

Forum<br />

(LLF)<br />

ss<br />

To<br />

promot<br />

e<br />

sound<br />

labour<br />

relatio<br />

ns<br />

EAP<br />

Committee<br />

s<br />

Training<br />

record<br />

EAP<br />

Report<br />

meetings<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

%<br />

establish<br />

ment of<br />

EAP<br />

Committ<br />

ees<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

training<br />

initiatives<br />

provided<br />

to EAP<br />

committe<br />

es<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

quarterly<br />

reports<br />

issued<br />

Number<br />

of LLF<br />

Meetings<br />

held<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

4<br />

quarte<br />

rly<br />

report<br />

s<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

12<br />

meetin<br />

gs<br />

100% 0 0 0 0 Establi<br />

shmen<br />

t report<br />

2 1 1 0 0 Trainin<br />

g<br />

Report<br />

4<br />

quarterly<br />

reports<br />

12<br />

Meetings<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

1 1 1 1 E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

3 3 3 3 Signed<br />

minute<br />

s<br />

50<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

sound<br />

administ<br />

ration<br />

enhance<br />

d<br />

producti<br />

vity<br />

acounta<br />

bility<br />

Labour<br />

peace


463<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

s<br />

ODT/0<br />

18/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

19/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

20/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Committ<br />

ee<br />

Training<br />

Labour<br />

Relations<br />

Bulletin/<br />

Publicati<br />

ons<br />

Reportin<br />

g<br />

Training<br />

committee<br />

Bulletins<br />

Reports<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

Res<br />

ourc<br />

es<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

review of<br />

training<br />

committe<br />

e<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

Labour<br />

Relations<br />

Bulletins<br />

issued<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

reports<br />

generate<br />

d<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

trainin<br />

g<br />

commi<br />

ttee<br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

4<br />

Bulleti<br />

ns<br />

issued<br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

12<br />

100%<br />

review of<br />

training<br />

committe<br />

e<br />

4<br />

Bulletins<br />

4<br />

Reports<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Memb<br />

ership<br />

report<br />

1 1 1 1 Bulleti<br />

ns<br />

1 1 1 1 Counci<br />

l<br />

resoluti<br />

on<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Account<br />

ability<br />

Informed<br />

Labour<br />

Force<br />

Account<br />

ability


464<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

21/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

22/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ce<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

HR Plan,<br />

HR<br />

Policies<br />

and<br />

Procedur<br />

es<br />

Successi<br />

on<br />

Plan/Car<br />

eer<br />

Pathing<br />

To<br />

provid<br />

e<br />

sound<br />

and<br />

sustain<br />

able<br />

human<br />

resour<br />

ces<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

HR Plan<br />

Policies<br />

and<br />

procedures<br />

Successio<br />

n Plan<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

Res<br />

ourc<br />

es<br />

hum<br />

an<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Percenta<br />

ge HR<br />

Plan<br />

develope<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

policies<br />

and<br />

procedur<br />

es<br />

reviewed<br />

/develop<br />

ed<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

Successi<br />

on Plan<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

30 HR<br />

Policie<br />

s in<br />

place<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

100%<br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

HR Plan<br />

(1) data<br />

gathering<br />

50% (2)<br />

draft plan<br />

25% (3)<br />

approval<br />

25%<br />

31<br />

policies<br />

reviewed<br />

/develop<br />

ed<br />

100%<br />

Develop<br />

ment of<br />

Successi<br />

on Plan<br />

(1) Data<br />

gathering<br />

50%, (2)<br />

Draft<br />

Plan<br />

25% (3)<br />

50<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resoluti<br />

on<br />

7 8 8 8 Counci<br />

l<br />

resoluti<br />

on<br />

50<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resoluti<br />

on<br />

130<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Sound<br />

administ<br />

ration<br />

Sound<br />

administ<br />

ration<br />

Organis<br />

ational<br />

Sustaina<br />

bility


465<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

<strong>23</strong>/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

24/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Retentio<br />

n<br />

Strategy<br />

Employm<br />

ent<br />

Equity<br />

Plan<br />

(EEP)<br />

Retention<br />

Strategy<br />

Employme<br />

nt Equity<br />

Plan<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

Retentio<br />

n<br />

Strategy<br />

<strong>Review</strong>e<br />

d<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

Employm<br />

ent<br />

Equity<br />

Targets<br />

achieved<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Retent<br />

ion<br />

Strate<br />

gy<br />

Emplo<br />

yment<br />

Equity<br />

Plan<br />

Approval<br />

25%<br />

100%<br />

Retentio<br />

n<br />

Strategy<br />

<strong>Review</strong>e<br />

d (1)<br />

Data<br />

gathering<br />

50%, (2)<br />

Draft<br />

Plan<br />

25% (3)<br />

Approval<br />

25%<br />

100%<br />

Employm<br />

ent<br />

Equity<br />

Targets<br />

achieved<br />

(Employ<br />

ment<br />

Equity<br />

Report)<br />

50<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resoluti<br />

on<br />

Recruit<br />

ment<br />

and<br />

Selecti<br />

on<br />

Report<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Organis<br />

ational<br />

Sustaina<br />

bility<br />

Empowe<br />

rment of<br />

designat<br />

ed<br />

groups


466<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

25/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

26/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

27/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Inform<br />

ation<br />

and<br />

Comm<br />

unicati<br />

on<br />

Techn<br />

ology<br />

(ICT)<br />

Recruitm<br />

ent and<br />

Selection<br />

Relocatio<br />

n<br />

expense<br />

s<br />

User<br />

Require<br />

ments<br />

analysis<br />

To<br />

provid<br />

e a<br />

conduc<br />

ive and<br />

sustain<br />

able<br />

enviro<br />

nment<br />

for<br />

Inform<br />

ation<br />

and<br />

Comm<br />

unicati<br />

Reduced<br />

vacancy<br />

rate<br />

Payment<br />

User<br />

Requireme<br />

nts<br />

Analysis<br />

Report<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

vacancy<br />

rate of<br />

funded<br />

posts<br />

kept<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

payment<br />

facilitate<br />

d<br />

Percenta<br />

ge user<br />

requirem<br />

ents<br />

analysis<br />

complete<br />

d<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

2<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

facilita<br />

ted<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

5% 5<br />

%<br />

100% 10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100%<br />

user<br />

requirem<br />

ents<br />

analysis<br />

complete<br />

d (1)<br />

Data<br />

gathering<br />

50%, (2)<br />

Draft<br />

Report<br />

25% (3)<br />

Approval<br />

25%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Recruit<br />

ment<br />

and<br />

Selecti<br />

on<br />

Report<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

User<br />

Requir<br />

ement<br />

s<br />

Analysi<br />

s<br />

Report<br />

R<br />

250<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

0 E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Organis<br />

ational<br />

Sustaina<br />

bility<br />

Stable<br />

Organis<br />

ation<br />

ENSUR<br />

E AN<br />

EFFECT<br />

IVE AND<br />

EFFICIE<br />

NT<br />

MUNICI<br />

PAL<br />

ADMINI<br />

STRATI<br />

ON


467<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

28/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Policy<br />

Analysis<br />

on<br />

Techn<br />

ology<br />

Policies<br />

and<br />

procedures<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

policies<br />

and<br />

procedur<br />

es<br />

reviewed<br />

/develop<br />

ed<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2<br />

Policie<br />

s and<br />

proce<br />

dures<br />

6 policies<br />

and<br />

procedur<br />

es<br />

reviewed<br />

/develop<br />

ed<br />

1 2 2 1 Counci<br />

l<br />

resoluti<br />

on<br />

0 E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Sound<br />

Administ<br />

ration<br />

ODT/0<br />

29/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

30/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ICT<br />

System<br />

Support<br />

ICT<br />

Upgrade<br />

s<br />

(wireless<br />

network)<br />

Support<br />

Provided<br />

wireless<br />

network<br />

available<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

Support<br />

provided<br />

to end<br />

users<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

wireless<br />

network<br />

available<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

User<br />

suppo<br />

rt<br />

100%<br />

upgra<br />

des<br />

done<br />

100%<br />

support<br />

provided<br />

90%<br />

wireless<br />

network<br />

available<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

90<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

90<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

90<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

90<br />

%<br />

Signed<br />

-off<br />

Report<br />

Signed<br />

off<br />

system<br />

report<br />

2<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

000<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration


468<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

31/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

32/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

33/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ICT<br />

Maintena<br />

nce<br />

Compute<br />

r<br />

consuma<br />

bles and<br />

accessor<br />

ies<br />

Commun<br />

ication<br />

(land<br />

lines,<br />

internet,<br />

email<br />

infrastruc<br />

ture<br />

expansio<br />

n)<br />

Functional<br />

ICT<br />

Consumab<br />

les and<br />

accessorie<br />

s available<br />

Communic<br />

ation<br />

networks<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Percenta<br />

ge ICT<br />

infrastruc<br />

ture<br />

maintain<br />

ed<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

acquisitio<br />

n of<br />

consuma<br />

bles and<br />

accessor<br />

ies<br />

requeste<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of sites<br />

included<br />

in the<br />

network<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

100%<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

done<br />

100%<br />

consu<br />

mable<br />

s<br />

acquir<br />

ed<br />

All<br />

offices<br />

except<br />

certain<br />

depos<br />

and<br />

region<br />

s<br />

conne<br />

cted to<br />

the<br />

100%<br />

ICT<br />

infrastruc<br />

ture<br />

maintain<br />

ed<br />

(1)repair<br />

s<br />

(2)replac<br />

ements<br />

100%<br />

acquisitio<br />

n of<br />

consuma<br />

bles and<br />

accessor<br />

ies<br />

requeste<br />

d<br />

18 sites<br />

included<br />

in the<br />

network<br />

(1)depot<br />

s<br />

(2)region<br />

al offices<br />

(3)fire<br />

stations<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Mainte<br />

nance<br />

Report<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

0 9 0 9 Signed<br />

-off<br />

Report<br />

R<br />

700<br />

000<br />

R<br />

200<br />

000<br />

R 4<br />

819<br />

693.<br />

96<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration


469<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

networ<br />

k<br />

ODT/0<br />

34/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

35/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Software<br />

and ICT<br />

Licenses<br />

Compute<br />

r<br />

equipme<br />

nt and<br />

accessor<br />

ies<br />

Software<br />

and ICT<br />

Licenses<br />

available<br />

Computer<br />

equipment<br />

and<br />

accessorie<br />

s acquired<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

software<br />

licenses<br />

paid<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

computer<br />

equipme<br />

nt and<br />

accessor<br />

ies<br />

acquired<br />

as and<br />

when<br />

requeste<br />

d<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Licens<br />

es<br />

with<br />

ICT<br />

Servic<br />

e<br />

provid<br />

ers<br />

paid<br />

100%<br />

compu<br />

ter<br />

equip<br />

ment<br />

and<br />

acces<br />

sories<br />

acquir<br />

ed<br />

100%<br />

software<br />

licenses<br />

paid<br />

100%<br />

records<br />

disposed<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

Signed<br />

-off<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

R 2<br />

300<br />

000<br />

R<br />

500<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration


470<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

36/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

37/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

38/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Organi<br />

sationa<br />

l<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Security<br />

upgrades<br />

server<br />

room<br />

Professio<br />

nal Fees<br />

Procedur<br />

e<br />

Manuals<br />

To<br />

improv<br />

e<br />

instituti<br />

onal<br />

develo<br />

pment<br />

and<br />

Upgraded<br />

Server<br />

room<br />

Payment<br />

Procedure<br />

manual<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Number<br />

of Server<br />

rooms<br />

upgrade<br />

d<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

professio<br />

nal fees<br />

expende<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

procedur<br />

e<br />

manuals<br />

reviewed<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

5<br />

server<br />

rooms<br />

100%<br />

Profes<br />

sional<br />

fees<br />

paid<br />

32<br />

proce<br />

dure<br />

manu<br />

als<br />

5 Server<br />

rooms<br />

upgrade<br />

d<br />

100%<br />

professio<br />

nal fees<br />

expende<br />

d<br />

20<br />

Procedur<br />

e<br />

Manuals<br />

<strong>Review</strong>e<br />

d<br />

1 1 2 1 Exit<br />

Report<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

5 5 5 5 Signed<br />

-off<br />

Report<br />

R<br />

200<br />

000<br />

R<br />

900<br />

000<br />

R<br />

500<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration<br />

Public<br />

and<br />

Busines<br />

s<br />

confiden<br />

ce<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration


471<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

39/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

40/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Form<br />

Design<br />

Organisa<br />

tional<br />

Structure<br />

produc<br />

tivity<br />

Form<br />

Organogra<br />

m<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Number<br />

of forms<br />

develope<br />

d<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

review of<br />

the<br />

Organisa<br />

tional<br />

Structure<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2011/<br />

12<br />

Appro<br />

ved<br />

Organi<br />

sation<br />

al<br />

Struct<br />

ure<br />

10 forms<br />

develope<br />

d<br />

100%<br />

review of<br />

the<br />

Organisa<br />

tional<br />

Structure<br />

(1) Data<br />

gathering<br />

50%, (2)<br />

Draft<br />

Report<br />

25% (3)<br />

Approval<br />

25%<br />

1 3 3 3 Signed<br />

-off<br />

Forms<br />

50<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resoluti<br />

on<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration


472<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

41/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

42/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Culture<br />

Survey<br />

Job<br />

Evaluatio<br />

n<br />

Diversity<br />

Manageme<br />

nt<br />

graded<br />

jobs<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

culture<br />

survey<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

Percenta<br />

ge job<br />

evaluatio<br />

n<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

No<br />

baseli<br />

ne<br />

100%<br />

culture<br />

survey<br />

conducte<br />

d (1)<br />

Data<br />

gathering<br />

50%, (2)<br />

Draft<br />

Report<br />

25% (3)<br />

Approval<br />

25%<br />

100%<br />

Job<br />

evaluatio<br />

n<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

(1) Data<br />

gathering<br />

50%, (2)<br />

Draft<br />

Report<br />

25% (3)<br />

Approval<br />

25%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

0 25<br />

%<br />

0 25<br />

%<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resoluti<br />

on<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration<br />

Ensure<br />

Efficient<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

Municipa<br />

l<br />

Administ<br />

ration


473<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

43/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

44/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

45/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Legal<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Performa<br />

nce<br />

Manage<br />

ment<br />

Legal<br />

Matters<br />

Legislativ<br />

e <strong>Review</strong><br />

Updates<br />

To<br />

monito<br />

r<br />

perfor<br />

mance<br />

of staff<br />

below<br />

manag<br />

ers<br />

To<br />

provid<br />

e<br />

effectiv<br />

e and<br />

efficien<br />

t legal<br />

service<br />

s<br />

Performan<br />

ce<br />

commitme<br />

nts<br />

attended<br />

court<br />

cases<br />

legislative<br />

review<br />

reports<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

commitm<br />

ents<br />

conclude<br />

d<br />

Percenta<br />

ge court<br />

matters<br />

attended<br />

to<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

legislativ<br />

e review<br />

updates<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

level 4<br />

and 5<br />

signed<br />

perfor<br />

mance<br />

commi<br />

tments<br />

availa<br />

ble<br />

4<br />

legisla<br />

tive<br />

review<br />

s done<br />

100%<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

commitm<br />

ents<br />

conclude<br />

d<br />

100%<br />

court<br />

matter<br />

attended<br />

4<br />

legislativ<br />

e review<br />

updates<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Signed<br />

Perfor<br />

mance<br />

Commi<br />

tments<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

1 1 1 1 Legisla<br />

tive<br />

review<br />

report<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Public<br />

account<br />

ability<br />

Sustaina<br />

ble<br />

business<br />

operatio<br />

ns<br />

Sound<br />

administ<br />

ration


474<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

46/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

47/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

48/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Auxiliar<br />

y<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

File Plan<br />

Records<br />

Disposal<br />

Archives<br />

To<br />

provid<br />

e<br />

sound<br />

record<br />

s<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

system<br />

s<br />

file plan<br />

disposed<br />

records<br />

archived<br />

files<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

percenta<br />

ge file<br />

plan<br />

reviewed<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

records<br />

disposed<br />

percenta<br />

ge files<br />

archived<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

file<br />

plan<br />

inspec<br />

tion<br />

condu<br />

cted<br />

by<br />

provin<br />

cial<br />

archivi<br />

st<br />

archiv<br />

e<br />

registe<br />

r in<br />

place<br />

100% file<br />

plan<br />

reviewed<br />

100%<br />

records<br />

disposed<br />

100%<br />

files<br />

archived<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

quarter<br />

ly<br />

reports<br />

dispos<br />

al<br />

certific<br />

ate<br />

archive<br />

registe<br />

r<br />

R<br />

41<br />

960<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

Sound<br />

administ<br />

ration<br />

public<br />

account<br />

ability<br />

public<br />

account<br />

ability


475<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

49/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

50/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

51/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Fleet<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

Personn<br />

el File<br />

Audit<br />

Contract<br />

Manage<br />

ment(flee<br />

t and<br />

facilities)<br />

Fuel<br />

(Fleet)<br />

To<br />

provid<br />

e an<br />

effectiv<br />

e fleet<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

system<br />

audit<br />

report<br />

payments<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

personne<br />

l files<br />

audited<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

monitorin<br />

g of<br />

contracts<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

payment<br />

of fuel<br />

made<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

draft<br />

report<br />

in<br />

place<br />

contra<br />

ct in<br />

place<br />

ad hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

100%<br />

personne<br />

l files<br />

audited<br />

100%<br />

monitorin<br />

g fleet<br />

and<br />

facilities<br />

contracts<br />

monitore<br />

d (1)<br />

payment<br />

of<br />

contract<br />

fees<br />

(2)contra<br />

ctor<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

100%<br />

payment<br />

made<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

audit<br />

report<br />

perfor<br />

mance<br />

reports<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

R 7<br />

442<br />

293<br />

R 3<br />

165<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

public<br />

account<br />

ability<br />

public<br />

account<br />

ability<br />

public<br />

account<br />

ability


476<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

s<br />

ODT/0<br />

52/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

53/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

54/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Repairs<br />

and<br />

maintena<br />

nce (own<br />

vehicles)<br />

Licenses<br />

&<br />

subscript<br />

ions<br />

Tracking<br />

devices(<br />

vehicles)<br />

roadworthy<br />

vehicles<br />

paid<br />

licenses<br />

and<br />

subscriptio<br />

ns<br />

secured<br />

vehicles<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

vehicles<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintain<br />

ed<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

licenses<br />

and<br />

subscript<br />

ions paid<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

tracking<br />

devices<br />

installed<br />

and<br />

functiona<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

ad hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

ad hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

ad hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

100%<br />

vehicles<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintain<br />

ed (1)<br />

service<br />

register<br />

(2)servic<br />

e and<br />

repairs<br />

100%<br />

licenses<br />

and<br />

subscript<br />

ions paid<br />

100%<br />

tracking<br />

devices<br />

installed<br />

and<br />

functiona<br />

l<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Quarte<br />

rly<br />

Mainte<br />

nance<br />

Report<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

Functi<br />

onality<br />

certific<br />

ates<br />

R<br />

750<br />

000<br />

R<br />

95<br />

348<br />

R<br />

156<br />

341<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

public<br />

account<br />

ability<br />

public<br />

account<br />

ability<br />

public<br />

account<br />

ability


477<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

s<br />

l<br />

ODT/0<br />

55/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

56/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Faciliti<br />

es<br />

Fleet<br />

manage<br />

ment(ow<br />

n<br />

vehicles)<br />

Repairs<br />

&<br />

maintena<br />

nce<br />

(Building<br />

&<br />

equipme<br />

nt)<br />

To<br />

provid<br />

e<br />

effectiv<br />

e<br />

facilitie<br />

s<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

system<br />

roadworthy<br />

vehicles<br />

habitable<br />

buildings<br />

and<br />

functional<br />

equipment<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

percenta<br />

ge fleet<br />

register<br />

compiled<br />

and<br />

maintain<br />

ed<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

repairs<br />

and<br />

maintena<br />

nce on<br />

buildings<br />

and<br />

equipme<br />

nt done<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

ad hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

ad hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

100%<br />

fleet<br />

register<br />

compiled<br />

and<br />

maintain<br />

ed (1)<br />

service<br />

register<br />

(2)allocat<br />

ion<br />

schedule<br />

s<br />

100%<br />

repairs<br />

and<br />

maintena<br />

nce<br />

(1)maint<br />

enance<br />

plan<br />

(2)maint<br />

enance<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Quarte<br />

rly<br />

Fleet<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

report<br />

quarter<br />

ly state<br />

of<br />

buildin<br />

g and<br />

equip<br />

ment<br />

report<br />

R 2<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R<br />

300<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

public<br />

account<br />

ability<br />

Sustaina<br />

bility


478<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

57/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

58/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

59/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Lease/re<br />

ntal<br />

(offices)<br />

Lease/re<br />

ntal<br />

(office<br />

machine<br />

s)<br />

Garden<br />

and<br />

cleaning<br />

services<br />

paid<br />

leases/rent<br />

al (offices)<br />

paid<br />

leases/rent<br />

al(machine<br />

s)<br />

clean<br />

environme<br />

nt<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

lease/ren<br />

tal paid<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

lease/ren<br />

tal paid<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

garden<br />

and<br />

cleaning<br />

services<br />

paid<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

ad hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

ad hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

ad hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

100%<br />

lease/ren<br />

tal paid<br />

100%<br />

lease/ren<br />

tal paid<br />

100%<br />

garden<br />

and<br />

cleaning<br />

services<br />

paid<br />

(1)cleani<br />

ng and<br />

gardenin<br />

g<br />

services<br />

register<br />

(2)paym<br />

ent<br />

schedule<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

R 4<br />

600<br />

000<br />

R 3<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 2<br />

400<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

public<br />

account<br />

ability<br />

public<br />

account<br />

ability<br />

envirinm<br />

ental<br />

awarene<br />

ss


479<br />

(iii)<br />

Institutional Development and Transformation <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 1: Institutional Development and Transformation<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

OUTCOME : A SKILLED AND CAPABLE WORKFORCE<br />

INP<br />

UTS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/201<br />

4<br />

TARGET<br />

S<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BU<br />

DG<br />

ET<br />

FU<br />

ND<br />

ER<br />

IMPACT<br />

S<br />

ODT/0<br />

60/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

ODT/0<br />

61/201<br />

3-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Office<br />

Equipme<br />

nt<br />

Furniture<br />

Equipme<br />

nt<br />

to<br />

provid<br />

e<br />

sound<br />

workin<br />

g<br />

enviro<br />

nment<br />

functional<br />

office<br />

equipment<br />

functional<br />

furniture<br />

equipment<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

reso<br />

urce<br />

s<br />

percenta<br />

ge office<br />

equipme<br />

nt<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintain<br />

ed<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

furniture<br />

equipme<br />

nt<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintain<br />

ed<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Corpo<br />

rate<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

ad hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

ad hoc<br />

report<br />

s<br />

100%<br />

office<br />

equipme<br />

nt<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintain<br />

ed<br />

100%<br />

furniture<br />

equipme<br />

nt<br />

repaired<br />

and<br />

maintain<br />

ed<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

quarter<br />

ly<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

report<br />

Quarte<br />

rly<br />

Mainte<br />

nance<br />

Report<br />

R<br />

220<br />

000<br />

R<br />

220<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

E-<br />

Sha<br />

re<br />

organisa<br />

tional<br />

sustaina<br />

bility<br />

organisa<br />

tional<br />

sustaina<br />

bility


480<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/00<br />

1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/00<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/00<br />

3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

(ACIP<br />

)<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Mahlakwena<br />

Village<br />

(Steelpoort)<br />

BWS - RO<br />

Flag Boshielo<br />

Water<br />

Conservation<br />

and Water<br />

Demand<br />

Management<br />

Burgersfort<br />

WWTW 7MI<br />

(Upgrading)<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

To<br />

provid<br />

e<br />

water<br />

and<br />

sanitati<br />

on to<br />

house<br />

holds<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

losses<br />

and<br />

improv<br />

ed<br />

pressu<br />

re<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

sanitat<br />

ion<br />

capaci<br />

ty<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

DWA<br />

Supp<br />

ort<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

0 121 0 12<br />

1<br />

50% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

60<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

75<br />

%<br />

80<br />

%<br />

- - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

- Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

- Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 3<br />

100<br />

000<br />

R 3<br />

500<br />

000<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

ACI<br />

P<br />

ACI<br />

P<br />

ACI<br />

P<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

service


481<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

BSD/00<br />

4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/00<br />

5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/00<br />

6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

(MIG)<br />

Marble Hall<br />

WWTW -<br />

Effluent Line<br />

Mooihoek<br />

Internal Bulk<br />

Bulk Pipeline<br />

to Lebalelo<br />

Central<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

sanitat<br />

ion<br />

capaci<br />

ty<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

5% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 20% -<br />

detailed<br />

designs<br />

approv<br />

ed<br />

=20%<br />

0% 20% -<br />

detailed<br />

designs<br />

approv<br />

ed<br />

5<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

R 6<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

500<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

080<br />

000<br />

ACI<br />

P<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

service<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


482<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

=20%<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

BSD/00<br />

7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/00<br />

8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/00<br />

9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Doubling of<br />

Mooihoek<br />

WTW<br />

Reservoirs in<br />

Lebalelo<br />

Central<br />

Connector<br />

Pipes to<br />

Lebalelo<br />

North<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

0% 20% -<br />

detailed<br />

designs<br />

approv<br />

ed<br />

=20%<br />

0% 20% -<br />

detailed<br />

designs<br />

approv<br />

ed<br />

=20%<br />

0% 20% -<br />

detailed<br />

designs<br />

approv<br />

ed<br />

=20%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

R 1<br />

050<br />

000<br />

R<br />

900<br />

000<br />

R<br />

660<br />

000<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


483<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/01<br />

0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/01<br />

1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/01<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Olifantspoort<br />

South<br />

Regional WS<br />

Scheme<br />

phase 6<br />

Nkadimeng<br />

BWS<br />

Carbonitites<br />

to Zaaiplaas<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

60% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

75<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

492 5000 0 0 50<br />

00<br />

50% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

60<br />

%<br />

70<br />

%<br />

- - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

- Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

- Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 10<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 24<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 15<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


484<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/01<br />

3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/01<br />

4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/01<br />

5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Jane Furse<br />

25ml<br />

command<br />

Reservoir(ph<br />

1C)<br />

Connector<br />

Pipes to<br />

Zaaiplaas<br />

Villages<br />

Groblersdal/L<br />

uckau Water<br />

Supply<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

90% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 10%(D<br />

esigns<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

50% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

- - - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

3<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

- - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 3<br />

200<br />

000<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 12<br />

794<br />

561<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


485<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/01<br />

6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/01<br />

7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/01<br />

8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Upgrading of<br />

Piet Gouws<br />

WTW<br />

Piet Gouws<br />

Bulk supply<br />

and storage<br />

Ga-<br />

Maphopha<br />

Command<br />

Reservoir<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

0% 50%(D<br />

esigns<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 20%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 20%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

20<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

30<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 4<br />

500<br />

000<br />

R<br />

750<br />

000<br />

R 4<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


486<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/01<br />

9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/02<br />

0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/02<br />

1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Steelpoort<br />

Valley<br />

Connector<br />

Pipeline<br />

Mphanama<br />

village<br />

connectors<br />

Gabaneng,<br />

Ga-Mmela<br />

Moutse BWS<br />

Phase<br />

(Counter<br />

funding)<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

0% 20%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 20%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

80%)<br />

N/A N/A 0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

5<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 4<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

0 MIG Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


487<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/02<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/02<br />

3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/02<br />

4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Ga-Nkwana<br />

Housing<br />

BWS<br />

Sekwati<br />

water supply<br />

project phase<br />

2 & 3<br />

Zaaiplaas<br />

Village<br />

Reticulations<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

50% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

75<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0 2980 0 29<br />

80<br />

0 1822 0 18<br />

22<br />

- - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

- - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

- - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 6<br />

200<br />

000<br />

R 7<br />

560<br />

000<br />

R 18<br />

650<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service


488<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/02<br />

5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/02<br />

6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/02<br />

7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Mooihoek<br />

Reticulation<br />

(Ga-Maroga,<br />

Mapea)<br />

Connector<br />

Pipes and<br />

reticulation to<br />

Lebalelo<br />

South<br />

Villages(Drie<br />

kop, Ga-<br />

Riba,<br />

Rivercross,<br />

Ga-Maeseng,<br />

Mandela and<br />

France)<br />

Ga-<br />

Maphopha,<br />

Ga-<br />

Malekana,<br />

Ga-Masha,<br />

Mapea<br />

Connector<br />

Pipes and<br />

Reticulation<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

0 20%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0 20%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0 50% -<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

5<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 2<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


489<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

service<br />

BSD/02<br />

8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/02<br />

9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Ga-Moloi<br />

Water<br />

Reticulation<br />

Solovo Water<br />

reticulation<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

0 50% -<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100% N/A N/<br />

A<br />

5<br />

%<br />

N/<br />

A<br />

20<br />

%<br />

N/<br />

A<br />

50<br />

%<br />

N/<br />

A<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

N/A<br />

R 2<br />

593<br />

739<br />

R<br />

200<br />

000<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service


490<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/03<br />

0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/03<br />

1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/03<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Lebalelo<br />

North Water<br />

Reticulation<br />

Ga-Nkwana<br />

Housing<br />

Water<br />

Reticulation<br />

Taung<br />

Reticulation<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

0 5%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0 2000 0 20<br />

00<br />

0 800 0 80<br />

0<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

- - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

- - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R<br />

600<br />

000<br />

R 2<br />

387<br />

000<br />

R <strong>23</strong><br />

080<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

MIG<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

N/A<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service


491<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/03<br />

3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/03<br />

4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/03<br />

5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Praktiseer<br />

Water Supply<br />

Mabotsha<br />

Water Supply<br />

Moteti B<br />

Water<br />

Reticulation<br />

(Zoetmelsfont<br />

ein)<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

0 4000 0 0 10<br />

00<br />

0 800 0 80<br />

0<br />

0 250 0 10<br />

0<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

40<br />

00<br />

Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

- - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

25<br />

0<br />

- Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 21<br />

720<br />

000<br />

R 7<br />

175<br />

000<br />

R 10<br />

900<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service


492<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/03<br />

6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/03<br />

7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/03<br />

8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Jane Furse<br />

Water<br />

Demand<br />

management<br />

Cost<br />

Recovery in<br />

Monsterlous,<br />

Motetema<br />

and Tafelkop<br />

Reservoir SB<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

losses<br />

and<br />

improv<br />

ed<br />

pressu<br />

re<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

Retrofi<br />

tting<br />

collap<br />

sing<br />

water<br />

servic<br />

es<br />

infrastr<br />

ucture<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

0% 20%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 5%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 1<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R<br />

450<br />

000<br />

R<br />

240<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

provisio<br />

n of<br />

basic<br />

service<br />

s to the<br />

residen<br />

ts of<br />

SDM<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

provisio<br />

n of<br />

basic<br />

service<br />

s to the<br />

residen<br />

ts of<br />

SDM<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


493<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

BSD/03<br />

9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/04<br />

0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Pipeline from<br />

Mooihoek to<br />

reservoir SB<br />

Bulk pipeline<br />

SB take off<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

0% 5%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 5%(De<br />

signs<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

R<br />

990<br />

000<br />

R<br />

500<br />

000<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


494<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/04<br />

1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/04<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/04<br />

3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Burgersfort<br />

WWTW 7MI<br />

(New plant )<br />

Burgersfort<br />

WWTW 7MI<br />

(refurbishme<br />

nt)<br />

Roosenekal<br />

WWTW<br />

Upgrade<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

sanitat<br />

ion<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

sanitat<br />

ion<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

sanitat<br />

ion<br />

supply<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

0% 5%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 100% -<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

20% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

0<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

0<br />

%<br />

80<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

- Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

- - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 24<br />

500<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

600<br />

000<br />

R 5<br />

868<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

service<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

service<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

service


495<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

BSD/04<br />

4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/04<br />

5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Apel Sewer<br />

WWTW<br />

VIP Backlog<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

sanitat<br />

ion<br />

supply<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

sanitat<br />

ion<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

0% 20% - -<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

0 38000 0 10<br />

00<br />

0<br />

10<br />

%<br />

25<br />

00<br />

0<br />

20<br />

%<br />

38<br />

00<br />

0<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R<br />

<strong>14</strong>7<br />

713<br />

000<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service


496<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/04<br />

6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/04<br />

7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/04<br />

8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SDM<br />

FUND<br />

ING<br />

(Capit<br />

al)<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Apel<br />

sanitation<br />

Tafelkop<br />

reticulation<br />

Borehole<br />

development<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

sanitat<br />

ion<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

borehole<br />

s<br />

develop<br />

ed<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

0 900 0 90<br />

0<br />

5% 30%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

5<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

5<br />

%<br />

- - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

10<br />

%<br />

30<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

<strong>14</strong> 15 3 6 9 15 Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 1<br />

654<br />

700<br />

R 30<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 5<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

MIG<br />

MIG<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service


497<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/04<br />

9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/05<br />

0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/05<br />

1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

RBIG<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Capital<br />

replacement/r<br />

efurbishment<br />

Mooihoek<br />

(Manoke &<br />

Dresden<br />

pipeline)<br />

Nebo Plateau<br />

Bulk Water<br />

Supply- Jane<br />

Furse-<br />

Marulaneng<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Retrofi<br />

tting<br />

collap<br />

sing<br />

water<br />

servic<br />

es<br />

infrastr<br />

ucture<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%expen<br />

diture<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

0% 100%<br />

(expen<br />

diture<br />

of<br />

allocati<br />

on)<br />

20% 80%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

50% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

25<br />

%<br />

30<br />

%<br />

60<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

60<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

80<br />

%<br />

Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

- Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 7<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 40<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 20<br />

285<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Reduce<br />

d<br />

interrup<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

service<br />

delivery<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


498<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/05<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/05<br />

3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/05<br />

4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Nebo Plateau<br />

Bulk Water<br />

Supply- Jane<br />

Furse to<br />

lobethal<br />

Ga-<br />

Malekana to<br />

Jane Furse<br />

pipeline<br />

Ga-Malekana<br />

WTW 36ml<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

50% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 20%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 5%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

60<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

75<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

- Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

20<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 24<br />

715<br />

000<br />

R 40<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 8<br />

911<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


499<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

BSD/05<br />

5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/05<br />

6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Moutse BWS<br />

(Project 7 to<br />

12 & 15)<br />

Moutse Bulk<br />

Water Supply<br />

(Project 1<br />

and 2)<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

5% 40%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

80% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

10<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

30<br />

%<br />

40<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

- - - Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

R 98<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 18<br />

200<br />

000<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


500<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/05<br />

7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/05<br />

8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/05<br />

9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Moutse BWS<br />

Phase 3,4,5<br />

Moutse BWS<br />

Project 13 &<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Magnet<br />

Heights to<br />

Schoonoord<br />

bulk pipeline<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Upgra<br />

ded<br />

bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

5% 50%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 50%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 30%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

10<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

25<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

15<br />

%<br />

40<br />

%<br />

30<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

30<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 70<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 31<br />

200<br />

000<br />

R 30<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

RBI<br />

G<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply


501<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

BSD/06<br />

0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/06<br />

1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

MWIG<br />

Ephraim<br />

Mogale<br />

Hotspots<br />

Projects<br />

Elias<br />

Motsoaledi<br />

Hotspots<br />

Projects<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

0% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

20<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

90<br />

%<br />

90<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

R 2<br />

891<br />

000<br />

R 9<br />

278<br />

000<br />

MWI<br />

G<br />

MWI<br />

G<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service


502<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/06<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/06<br />

3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/06<br />

4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Makhudutha<br />

maga<br />

Hotspots<br />

Projects<br />

Fetakgomo<br />

Hotspots<br />

Projects<br />

Greater<br />

Tubatse<br />

Hotspots<br />

Projects<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

0% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

0% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

20<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

90<br />

%<br />

90<br />

%<br />

90<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 3<br />

626<br />

000<br />

R<br />

376<br />

000<br />

R 13<br />

029<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

MWI<br />

G<br />

MWI<br />

G<br />

MWI<br />

G<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service


503<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

BSD/06<br />

5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/06<br />

6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

RTSI<br />

G<br />

(RRA<br />

MS)<br />

WSO<br />

G<br />

Rural Roads<br />

Asset<br />

Management<br />

Systems<br />

(RRAMS)<br />

Programme<br />

Community<br />

water supply<br />

for<br />

Mabopane &<br />

Moraleng<br />

To<br />

provid<br />

e data<br />

on<br />

road<br />

networ<br />

ks<br />

To<br />

refurbi<br />

sh<br />

water<br />

and<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

schem<br />

es<br />

Reduc<br />

ed<br />

water<br />

backlo<br />

gs<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

DWA<br />

Supp<br />

ort<br />

%<br />

completi<br />

on of<br />

activities<br />

in the<br />

annual<br />

impleme<br />

ntation<br />

plan<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

90% 100%<br />

(progre<br />

ss as<br />

per<br />

annual<br />

busines<br />

s plan)<br />

0% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Proje<br />

ct<br />

progr<br />

ess<br />

report<br />

Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

R 1<br />

781<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

000<br />

000<br />

DOT<br />

DW<br />

A<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

plannin<br />

g of<br />

roads<br />

infrastr<br />

ucture<br />

New<br />

connec<br />

tions to<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

and<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

service


504<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/06<br />

7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/06<br />

8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/06<br />

9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Replacement<br />

of dedicated<br />

line to Jane<br />

Furse<br />

Hospital<br />

Refurb&<br />

Upgrading of<br />

Hlogotlou<br />

WTW<br />

Refurb of<br />

Dennilton<br />

sewage<br />

pump station<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Retrofi<br />

tting<br />

collap<br />

sing<br />

water<br />

servic<br />

es<br />

infrastr<br />

ucture<br />

Retrofi<br />

tting<br />

collap<br />

sing<br />

water<br />

servic<br />

es<br />

infrastr<br />

ucture<br />

Retrofi<br />

tting<br />

collap<br />

sing<br />

water<br />

servic<br />

es<br />

infrastr<br />

ucture<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

DWA<br />

Supp<br />

ort<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

DWA<br />

Supp<br />

ort<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

DWA<br />

Supp<br />

ort<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

Completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

Completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

Completi<br />

on<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

5% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

5% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

5% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 1<br />

500<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

500<br />

000<br />

R 2<br />

200<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

DW<br />

A<br />

DW<br />

A<br />

DW<br />

A<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

water<br />

supply<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

service


505<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

80%)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

BSD/07<br />

0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/07<br />

1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Refurb of<br />

Motetema<br />

Sewer Pump<br />

stations and<br />

Network<br />

Refurb of<br />

Elandskraal<br />

sewage<br />

ponds<br />

Retrofi<br />

tting<br />

collap<br />

sing<br />

water<br />

servic<br />

es<br />

infrastr<br />

ucture<br />

Retrofi<br />

tting<br />

collap<br />

sing<br />

water<br />

servic<br />

es<br />

infrastr<br />

ucture<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

DWA<br />

Supp<br />

ort<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

DWA<br />

Supp<br />

ort<br />

%<br />

Completi<br />

on<br />

%<br />

Completi<br />

on<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

5% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

5% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

R 1<br />

300<br />

000<br />

R 3<br />

500<br />

000<br />

DW<br />

A<br />

DW<br />

A<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

service<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

service


506<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/07<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/07<br />

3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/07<br />

4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SDM<br />

FUND<br />

ING<br />

(opera<br />

tional)<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Penge<br />

(Upgrading of<br />

WWTW &<br />

WTW)<br />

Repairs and<br />

maintenance<br />

Electricity<br />

purchases<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

To<br />

provid<br />

e<br />

operati<br />

ons<br />

and<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

of<br />

water<br />

and<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

service<br />

s<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Retrofi<br />

tting<br />

collap<br />

sing<br />

water<br />

servic<br />

es<br />

infrastr<br />

ucture<br />

Ongoing<br />

operati<br />

on and<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

ESKO<br />

M<br />

claims<br />

submit<br />

ted for<br />

payme<br />

nt<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

DWA<br />

Supp<br />

ort<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

Completi<br />

on<br />

100%<br />

registere<br />

d<br />

incidenc<br />

es<br />

resolved<br />

within <strong>14</strong><br />

days<br />

%<br />

ESKOM<br />

claims<br />

received<br />

facilitate<br />

d<br />

submitte<br />

d within<br />

5 days<br />

of<br />

receipt<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

5% 100%<br />

(Design<br />

s<br />

approv<br />

ed =<br />

20%,<br />

Constru<br />

ction<br />

complet<br />

e =<br />

80%)<br />

80%<br />

approx<br />

Not<br />

determi<br />

ned<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

25<br />

%<br />

100% 80<br />

%<br />

100%<br />

(Claims<br />

receive<br />

d and<br />

submitt<br />

ed to<br />

BTO<br />

within 5<br />

days)<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

50<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

!00<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Com<br />

pletio<br />

n<br />

report<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 4<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 13<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 21<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

DW<br />

A<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed bulk<br />

sanitati<br />

on<br />

service<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

standar<br />

ds<br />

No<br />

interrup<br />

tions<br />

due to<br />

nonpayme<br />

nt of<br />

ESKO<br />

M bills


507<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/07<br />

5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/07<br />

6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/07<br />

7/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Water<br />

purchases<br />

Fuel and<br />

lubricant<br />

purchases<br />

Agency<br />

services<br />

water (Elias)<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Water<br />

Purch<br />

ases<br />

claims<br />

submit<br />

ted for<br />

payme<br />

nt<br />

Fuel<br />

and<br />

lubrica<br />

nt<br />

claims<br />

submit<br />

ted for<br />

payme<br />

nt<br />

Ongoing<br />

operati<br />

on and<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

WSA<br />

Unit<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%Water<br />

purchas<br />

e claims<br />

received<br />

facilitate<br />

d<br />

submitte<br />

d within<br />

10 days<br />

of<br />

receipt<br />

% Fuel<br />

and<br />

Lubricati<br />

on<br />

claims<br />

received<br />

facilitate<br />

d<br />

submitte<br />

d within<br />

5 days<br />

of<br />

receipt<br />

%<br />

Complia<br />

nce with<br />

Service<br />

level<br />

agreeme<br />

nt<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Not<br />

determi<br />

ned<br />

Not<br />

determi<br />

ned<br />

Not<br />

determi<br />

ned<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

100%<br />

(Claims<br />

receive<br />

d and<br />

submitt<br />

ed to<br />

BTO<br />

within<br />

10<br />

days)<br />

100%<br />

(Claims<br />

receive<br />

d and<br />

submitt<br />

ed to<br />

BTO<br />

within 5<br />

days)<br />

100%<br />

(Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

SLA)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 52<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 3<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R<br />

400<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

standar<br />

ds<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

standar<br />

ds<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

standar<br />

ds


508<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/07<br />

8/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/07<br />

9/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/08<br />

0/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Tankering<br />

Sewerage<br />

services -<br />

Repairs and<br />

maintenance<br />

Sewerage<br />

services -<br />

sucking of<br />

VIP toilets<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Ongoing<br />

operati<br />

on and<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

Ongoing<br />

operati<br />

on and<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

Ongoing<br />

operati<br />

on and<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

househo<br />

lds<br />

served<br />

through<br />

water<br />

tankers<br />

at least<br />

3 times<br />

a week<br />

100%<br />

registere<br />

d<br />

incidenc<br />

es<br />

resolved<br />

within <strong>14</strong><br />

days<br />

Number<br />

of toilets<br />

sucked<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

1000 1000 10<br />

00<br />

Not<br />

determi<br />

ned<br />

Not<br />

determi<br />

ned<br />

100% 10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

1000 25<br />

0<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

10<br />

00<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

50<br />

0<br />

10<br />

00<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

75<br />

0<br />

10<br />

00<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

00<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 1<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 4<br />

654<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

standar<br />

ds<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

standar<br />

ds<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

standar<br />

ds


509<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSD/08<br />

1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/08<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/08<br />

3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/08<br />

4/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Agency<br />

services<br />

Sanitation<br />

(Elias)<br />

Agency<br />

services<br />

Sanitation<br />

(Ephraim)<br />

Laboratory<br />

and<br />

Chemicals<br />

Professional<br />

fees<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

To<br />

maintai<br />

n<br />

water<br />

quality<br />

within<br />

accept<br />

able<br />

limits<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

pruden<br />

t<br />

financi<br />

al<br />

manag<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Ongoing<br />

operati<br />

on and<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

Ongoing<br />

operati<br />

on and<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

Ongoing<br />

operati<br />

on and<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

Ongoing<br />

operati<br />

on and<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

%<br />

Complia<br />

nce with<br />

Service<br />

level<br />

agreeme<br />

nt<br />

%<br />

Complia<br />

nce with<br />

Service<br />

level<br />

agreeme<br />

nt<br />

% of<br />

availabili<br />

ty of<br />

chemical<br />

s<br />

%<br />

Complia<br />

nce with<br />

Service<br />

level<br />

agreeme<br />

nt<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Not<br />

determi<br />

ned<br />

Not<br />

determi<br />

ned<br />

Not<br />

determi<br />

ned<br />

Not<br />

determi<br />

ned<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

100%<br />

(Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

SLA)<br />

100%<br />

(Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

SLA)<br />

100%<br />

(availab<br />

ility of<br />

chemic<br />

als)<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100% 10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

Mont<br />

hly<br />

O&M<br />

statu<br />

s quo<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R<br />

<strong>14</strong>0<br />

000<br />

R 90<br />

000<br />

R 5<br />

300<br />

000<br />

R 2<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

standar<br />

ds<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

standar<br />

ds<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

standar<br />

ds<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with<br />

service<br />

level<br />

standar<br />

ds


510<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

ement<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

BSD/08<br />

5/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

BSD/08<br />

6/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

<strong>14</strong><br />

Transfer of<br />

taxi ranks to<br />

locals<br />

Infrastructure<br />

planning<br />

To<br />

enhan<br />

ce<br />

owners<br />

hip of<br />

local<br />

facilitie<br />

s<br />

To<br />

enhan<br />

ce<br />

forwar<br />

d<br />

plannin<br />

g<br />

Taxi<br />

ranks<br />

transfe<br />

rred to<br />

local<br />

munici<br />

palitie<br />

s<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

planni<br />

ng of<br />

water<br />

servic<br />

es<br />

deliver<br />

y<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Number<br />

of taxi<br />

ranks<br />

transferr<br />

ed<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

approve<br />

d Plans<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Infrast<br />

ructur<br />

e and<br />

Water<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

0 6 6 - - - Trans<br />

fer<br />

agree<br />

ment<br />

10 5 1 2 3 5 MON<br />

THLY<br />

PIU<br />

report<br />

R<br />

700<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

911<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

transpo<br />

rtation<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

implem<br />

entatio<br />

n of<br />

project<br />

s


511<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSDI/0<br />

87/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

BSDI/0<br />

88/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

Emerg<br />

ency<br />

Mana<br />

geme<br />

nt<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

EMS<br />

Maintenance<br />

Equipment<br />

Station<br />

uniform and<br />

protective<br />

clothing<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

To<br />

promot<br />

e<br />

sustain<br />

able<br />

EMS<br />

service<br />

s<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Reliabl<br />

e<br />

Equip<br />

ment<br />

Statio<br />

n<br />

unifor<br />

m and<br />

protect<br />

ive<br />

clothin<br />

g<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

repair,<br />

service<br />

and<br />

mainten<br />

ance of<br />

EMS<br />

equipme<br />

nt<br />

100%<br />

purchas<br />

e of<br />

station<br />

uniform<br />

and<br />

protectiv<br />

e<br />

clothing<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

no<br />

baselin<br />

e<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

purcha<br />

se of<br />

station<br />

uniform<br />

and<br />

protecti<br />

ve<br />

clothing<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

100%<br />

Repair,<br />

service<br />

and<br />

mainte<br />

nance<br />

of EMS<br />

equipm<br />

ent<br />

100%<br />

Purcha<br />

se of<br />

station<br />

uniform<br />

and<br />

protecti<br />

ve<br />

clothing<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Signe<br />

d-off<br />

Repo<br />

rt<br />

Deliv<br />

ery<br />

notes<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R25<br />

0<br />

000<br />

R80<br />

0<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

commu<br />

nity<br />

safety<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

commu<br />

nity<br />

safety<br />

BSDI/0<br />

89/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Disast<br />

er<br />

Mana<br />

geme<br />

nt<br />

Disaster relief<br />

material<br />

Provisi<br />

on of<br />

relief<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Disaster<br />

tents<br />

and<br />

blankets<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

purcha<br />

se of<br />

disaster<br />

materia<br />

l<br />

100%<br />

Purcha<br />

se of<br />

relief<br />

materia<br />

l as and<br />

when<br />

require<br />

d<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Deliv<br />

ery<br />

notes<br />

R48<br />

0<br />

000<br />

SD<br />

M<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

public<br />

confide<br />

nce


512<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSDI/0<br />

90/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

BSDI/0<br />

91/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Membership<br />

fees<br />

Emergency<br />

awareness<br />

campaigns<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

To<br />

promot<br />

e<br />

profes<br />

sional<br />

develo<br />

pment<br />

To<br />

enhan<br />

ce<br />

comm<br />

unity<br />

knowle<br />

dge<br />

base<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Paym<br />

ent<br />

Inform<br />

ed<br />

comm<br />

unity<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

Payment<br />

of<br />

member<br />

ship fees<br />

paid to<br />

professi<br />

onal<br />

bodies<br />

50<br />

emergen<br />

cy<br />

awarene<br />

ss<br />

campaig<br />

ns<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

payme<br />

nt of<br />

membe<br />

rship<br />

fees<br />

Numbe<br />

r of<br />

emerge<br />

ncy<br />

awaren<br />

ess<br />

campai<br />

gns<br />

held<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

100%<br />

Payme<br />

nt of<br />

membe<br />

rship<br />

fees<br />

20<br />

Emerge<br />

ncy<br />

awaren<br />

ess<br />

campai<br />

gns<br />

held<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

paym<br />

ent<br />

5 5 5 5 Exit<br />

Repo<br />

rt<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R50<br />

000<br />

R50<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Profess<br />

ional<br />

recogni<br />

tion<br />

Informe<br />

d public<br />

BSDI/0<br />

92/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Special<br />

operations<br />

high density<br />

day (Arrive<br />

Alive)<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Numbe<br />

r of<br />

Special<br />

Operati<br />

on High<br />

Density<br />

Day<br />

underta<br />

ken<br />

2<br />

Special<br />

Operati<br />

on High<br />

Density<br />

Day<br />

underta<br />

ken<br />

1 0 0 1 Exit<br />

Repo<br />

rt<br />

R19<br />

0<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

provisio<br />

n of<br />

basic<br />

service<br />

s to the<br />

residen<br />

ts of<br />

SDM


513<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSDI/0<br />

93/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

BSDI/0<br />

94/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

Munici<br />

pal<br />

Health<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

EMS Training<br />

Academy<br />

Air quality<br />

management<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

To<br />

develo<br />

p skills<br />

To<br />

promot<br />

e<br />

enviro<br />

nment<br />

al and<br />

person<br />

al<br />

health<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Operat<br />

ional<br />

materi<br />

al<br />

Promo<br />

te<br />

clean<br />

health<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

Air<br />

Quality<br />

and<br />

Weather<br />

monitori<br />

ng<br />

station<br />

installed<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

percent<br />

age<br />

purcha<br />

se of<br />

EMS<br />

acade<br />

my<br />

operati<br />

onal<br />

materia<br />

l<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

implem<br />

entatio<br />

n of Air<br />

Quality<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

plan<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

100%<br />

purcha<br />

se of<br />

EMS<br />

acade<br />

my<br />

operati<br />

onal<br />

materia<br />

l<br />

100%<br />

Implem<br />

entatio<br />

n of air<br />

quality<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

plan (1)<br />

Tender<br />

process<br />

25% (2)<br />

Commi<br />

ssionin<br />

g 25%<br />

(3)<br />

Monitor<br />

ing<br />

50%<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

purch<br />

ase<br />

State<br />

of Air<br />

Qualit<br />

y<br />

Repo<br />

rt<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R<br />

130<br />

000<br />

R 1<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Skills<br />

develo<br />

pment<br />

Clean<br />

environ<br />

ment


5<strong>14</strong><br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSDI/0<br />

95/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

MHS<br />

Awareness<br />

Programme<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Inform<br />

ed<br />

stakeh<br />

olders<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

MHS<br />

awaren<br />

ess<br />

progra<br />

mme<br />

conduct<br />

ed<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

100%<br />

MHS<br />

awaren<br />

ess<br />

progra<br />

mme<br />

conduct<br />

ed (1)<br />

stakeho<br />

lder<br />

mobilis<br />

ation<br />

50%(2)<br />

implem<br />

entatio<br />

n 50%<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Exit<br />

Repo<br />

rt<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 80<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Clean<br />

enviro<br />

nment


515<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSDI/0<br />

96/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

HIV/AIDS<br />

Strategy<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Incide<br />

nce<br />

reducti<br />

on<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

number<br />

of<br />

initiativ<br />

es<br />

conduct<br />

ed for<br />

HIV/AI<br />

DS<br />

strateg<br />

y<br />

implem<br />

entatio<br />

n<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

4<br />

Initiativ<br />

es<br />

conduct<br />

ed for<br />

HIV/AI<br />

DS<br />

strateg<br />

y<br />

implem<br />

entatio<br />

n<br />

(1)worl<br />

d AIDS<br />

day (2)<br />

Candle<br />

light (3)<br />

SDI<br />

condo<br />

m week<br />

(4) TB<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

0 1 3 1 Exit<br />

Repo<br />

rt<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R<br />

500<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS


516<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSDI/0<br />

97/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

BSDI/0<br />

98/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Health<br />

Council<br />

Talafatsa<br />

<strong>Sekhukhune</strong><br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Apprai<br />

sal of<br />

MEC<br />

on<br />

health<br />

matter<br />

s<br />

Trees<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

support<br />

to<br />

district<br />

health<br />

council<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

establis<br />

hment<br />

of<br />

nursery<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

100%<br />

Support<br />

to<br />

district<br />

health<br />

council<br />

(1)<br />

logistic<br />

al<br />

support<br />

50%(2)<br />

agenda<br />

s and<br />

reports<br />

50%<br />

100%<br />

Establis<br />

hment<br />

(1)<br />

specific<br />

ations<br />

for<br />

indigen<br />

ous<br />

trees<br />

20% (2)<br />

procure<br />

ment<br />

and<br />

distribut<br />

e to<br />

locals<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

60<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

Exit<br />

Repo<br />

rt<br />

Exit<br />

Repo<br />

rt<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 20<br />

000<br />

R<br />

100<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

health<br />

Protec<br />

ted<br />

enviro<br />

nment


517<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

60%<br />

(3)moni<br />

toring<br />

20%<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

BSDI/0<br />

99/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-<strong>14</strong><br />

MHS<br />

Equipment<br />

Equip<br />

ment<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Percent<br />

age<br />

purcha<br />

se<br />

MHS<br />

equipm<br />

ent<br />

100%<br />

Purcha<br />

se<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

purch<br />

ase<br />

R 50<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

Condu<br />

cive<br />

enviro<br />

nment<br />

for<br />

operati<br />

ons


518<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSDI/1<br />

00/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

Sport<br />

Devel<br />

opme<br />

nt<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Executive<br />

Mayors<br />

Marathon<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Health<br />

y<br />

lifestyl<br />

e<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Numbe<br />

r of<br />

Executi<br />

ve<br />

Mayor's<br />

Marath<br />

on held<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

1 1 0 0 0 Exit<br />

Repo<br />

rt<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R<br />

100<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS<br />

Health<br />

y<br />

lifestyl<br />

e<br />

BSDI/1<br />

01/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

BSDI/1<br />

02/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

BSDI/1<br />

03/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

BSDI/1<br />

04/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Sports<br />

, Art<br />

and<br />

Cultur<br />

e<br />

Devel<br />

opme<br />

nt<br />

Executive<br />

Mayors Cup<br />

Executive<br />

Mayor's Cup<br />

Sports<br />

Academy<br />

Tournament<br />

for Aged<br />

To<br />

promot<br />

e mass<br />

particip<br />

ation in<br />

sports<br />

arts<br />

and<br />

culture<br />

Health<br />

y<br />

lifestyl<br />

e<br />

Hum<br />

an<br />

and<br />

Fina<br />

ncial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Executiv<br />

e<br />

Mayor's<br />

cup,<br />

Tournam<br />

ent for<br />

the<br />

Aged,<br />

Support<br />

to all<br />

codes,<br />

Heritage<br />

and<br />

cultural<br />

show,<br />

Languag<br />

e<br />

promotio<br />

n,<br />

Capacity<br />

building<br />

were<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Numbe<br />

r of<br />

initiativ<br />

es to<br />

support<br />

sports<br />

arts<br />

and<br />

culture<br />

develop<br />

ment<br />

conduct<br />

ed<br />

6<br />

Initiativ<br />

es<br />

3 2 1 0 Exit<br />

Repo<br />

rt<br />

R<br />

946<br />

912<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

social<br />

cohesi<br />

on and<br />

improv<br />

ed<br />

lifestyl<br />

es


519<br />

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 2: BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE DELIVERY<br />

OUTCOME :<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

BSDI/1<br />

05/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

BSDI/1<br />

06/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

BSDI/1<br />

07/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-20<strong>14</strong><br />

BSDI/1<br />

08/<strong>2013</strong><br />

-<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGI<br />

C<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJECTS<br />

Support to all<br />

sports Codes<br />

Heritage and<br />

Cultural<br />

Show<br />

Language<br />

Promotion<br />

Arts and<br />

Culture<br />

Capacity<br />

Building<br />

OBJE<br />

CTIVE<br />

S<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFR<br />

OMANC<br />

E<br />

INDICA<br />

TORS<br />

undertak<br />

en in<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

Direct<br />

or<br />

Comm<br />

unity<br />

Servic<br />

es<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARGE<br />

TS<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 EVID<br />

ENC<br />

E<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPA<br />

CTS


520<br />

LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA3 : LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

LED/00<br />

1/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

LED/00<br />

2/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

LED/00<br />

3/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Strategi<br />

c<br />

Projects<br />

LOCAL<br />

ECONO<br />

MIC<br />

DEVELO<br />

PMENT<br />

Sub<br />

Projects<br />

Small<br />

Business<br />

Seminar<br />

SMME/Co<br />

operative<br />

support<br />

Market<br />

exhibition<br />

s<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

To<br />

conduc<br />

t<br />

semina<br />

rs for<br />

small<br />

busines<br />

ses<br />

To<br />

provide<br />

support<br />

to<br />

SMME'<br />

s and<br />

cooper<br />

atives<br />

To<br />

provide<br />

platfor<br />

m for<br />

SMME'<br />

s<br />

exhibiti<br />

ons<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

inform<br />

ed<br />

busin<br />

esses<br />

increa<br />

sed<br />

produ<br />

ctivity<br />

marke<br />

ting<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

financia<br />

l<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

PERFROM<br />

ANCE<br />

INDICATO<br />

RS<br />

Number of<br />

business<br />

seminars<br />

conducted<br />

Number of<br />

SMME's/Co<br />

operatives<br />

supported<br />

with<br />

production<br />

inputs and<br />

equipment<br />

Number of<br />

SMME's<br />

exposed to<br />

market<br />

exhibitions<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

Initiativ<br />

es with<br />

busine<br />

sses<br />

held in<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

20<br />

SMME<br />

's<br />

suppor<br />

ted<br />

LED<br />

Strate<br />

gy<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

5<br />

busine<br />

ss<br />

semina<br />

rs held<br />

5<br />

SMME'<br />

s<br />

/Coope<br />

ratives<br />

support<br />

ed with<br />

product<br />

ion<br />

inputs<br />

and<br />

equipm<br />

ent<br />

4<br />

SMME'<br />

s<br />

expose<br />

d to<br />

market<br />

exhibiti<br />

ons<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVID<br />

ENCE<br />

3 2 0 0 Exit<br />

Repor<br />

ts<br />

1 2 2 0 Exit<br />

Repor<br />

ts<br />

0 2 2 0 Exit<br />

Repor<br />

ts<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R60<br />

0,00<br />

0<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Local<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment


521<br />

LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <strong>2013</strong> - 20<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA3 : LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

Strategi<br />

c<br />

Projects<br />

Sub<br />

Projects<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFROM<br />

ANCE<br />

INDICATO<br />

RS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASE<br />

LINES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q<br />

4<br />

EVID<br />

ENCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Job<br />

Creation<br />

Reports<br />

To<br />

generat<br />

e<br />

reports<br />

on job<br />

creatio<br />

n<br />

Repor<br />

t<br />

HUMA<br />

N AND<br />

FINAN<br />

CIAL<br />

RESO<br />

URCE<br />

S<br />

Number of<br />

reports on<br />

municipal<br />

job creation<br />

generated<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

4<br />

reports<br />

4<br />

reports<br />

1 1 1 1 Quart<br />

erly<br />

report<br />

s<br />

E-<br />

shar<br />

e<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS


522<br />

GGPP/001/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/002/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/003/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/004/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/005/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Internal<br />

Audit<br />

Performa<br />

nce Audit<br />

Regularity<br />

Audit<br />

ICT<br />

Audits<br />

3 Year<br />

rolling<br />

plan<br />

Adhoc<br />

Assignme<br />

nts<br />

To<br />

assess<br />

and<br />

evaluate<br />

municipal<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

informati<br />

on<br />

To<br />

review<br />

Internal<br />

controls<br />

To<br />

evaluate<br />

and<br />

improve<br />

the<br />

effective<br />

ness of<br />

ICT<br />

controls<br />

To<br />

develop<br />

three<br />

year<br />

rolling<br />

internal<br />

audit<br />

plan<br />

To<br />

perform<br />

ad hoc<br />

assignm<br />

ents as<br />

requeste<br />

d by<br />

council<br />

and<br />

manage<br />

ment<br />

Perform<br />

ance<br />

Report<br />

Control<br />

Environ<br />

ment<br />

ICT<br />

Audit<br />

Reports<br />

Three<br />

[3] year<br />

and<br />

Annual<br />

Internal<br />

Audit<br />

Plan<br />

Ad Hoc<br />

Reports<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

Performa<br />

nce Audit<br />

reports<br />

issued<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

regularity<br />

audit<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of ICT<br />

Audit<br />

report<br />

issued<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

review of<br />

the<br />

Three<br />

year and<br />

Annual<br />

IA Plan<br />

Percenta<br />

ge Ad<br />

Hoc<br />

Reports<br />

issued<br />

N<br />

Chief<br />

Audit<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Chief<br />

Audit<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Chief<br />

Audit<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Chief<br />

Audit<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Chief<br />

Audit<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

4<br />

Perform<br />

ance<br />

Audit<br />

reports<br />

issued<br />

25<br />

Regular<br />

ity<br />

audits<br />

issued<br />

1 ICT<br />

Audit<br />

report<br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Three<br />

year<br />

and<br />

Annual<br />

IA Plan<br />

Seven<br />

[7] Ad<br />

Hoc<br />

Reports<br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

4<br />

Performan<br />

ce Audit<br />

reports<br />

28<br />

Regularity<br />

audits<br />

4 ICT Audit<br />

reports<br />

100%<br />

review of<br />

Three year<br />

and Annual<br />

IA plan<br />

100% Ad<br />

Hoc<br />

Reports<br />

1 1 1 1 Perfor<br />

mance<br />

audit<br />

reports<br />

6 8 8 6 Interna<br />

l audit<br />

reports<br />

1 1 1 1 ICT<br />

Audit<br />

reports<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Audit<br />

Commi<br />

ttee<br />

Approv<br />

al<br />

Ad<br />

Hoc<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

R1<br />

000<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability


5<strong>23</strong><br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/006/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/007/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/008/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/009/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

Audit<br />

Fees<br />

External<br />

Audit<br />

Committe<br />

e<br />

IA<br />

Electronic<br />

System<br />

Operation<br />

Clean<br />

Audit<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

To<br />

facilitate<br />

payment<br />

of auditor<br />

general<br />

South<br />

Africa<br />

To<br />

coordinat<br />

e<br />

activities<br />

of audit<br />

committe<br />

e<br />

To<br />

procure<br />

electroni<br />

c internal<br />

audit<br />

working<br />

paper<br />

system<br />

To<br />

monitor<br />

attendan<br />

ce to AG<br />

Matters<br />

towards<br />

clean<br />

audit<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

Paymen<br />

t<br />

Process<br />

ed<br />

Adminis<br />

tration<br />

Support<br />

Audit<br />

Softwar<br />

e<br />

Complia<br />

nce<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

payment<br />

facilitatio<br />

n for<br />

Auditor-<br />

General<br />

South<br />

Africa<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

Facilitati<br />

on of AC<br />

activities<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

Procure<br />

ment of<br />

IA<br />

Electroni<br />

c System<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

monitorin<br />

g to<br />

attendan<br />

ce to AG<br />

Matters<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Chief<br />

Audit<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Chief<br />

Audit<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Chief<br />

Audit<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Chief<br />

Audit<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

100%<br />

paymen<br />

t<br />

process<br />

ed<br />

Six[6]<br />

Meeting<br />

s<br />

Facilitat<br />

ed<br />

No<br />

Baselin<br />

e<br />

OPCA<br />

steering<br />

committ<br />

ee<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

100%<br />

payment<br />

facilitation<br />

100%<br />

Facilitation<br />

1. Agendas<br />

and<br />

Minutes<br />

[50%] 2.<br />

Compile<br />

AC<br />

Reports<br />

[50%]<br />

100%<br />

Procureme<br />

nt<br />

100%<br />

monitoring<br />

(1) AG<br />

action plan<br />

(2) AFS<br />

Preparatio<br />

n plans (3)<br />

Audit File<br />

(4) IA<br />

Implement<br />

ation Plan<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Proof<br />

of<br />

payme<br />

nt<br />

AC<br />

Agend<br />

as<br />

Electro<br />

nic<br />

Syste<br />

m<br />

Purcha<br />

sed<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 3<br />

300<br />

000<br />

R<br />

500<br />

000<br />

R20<br />

0<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Busine<br />

ss<br />

confide<br />

nce<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

busine<br />

ss<br />

proces<br />

ses<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability


524<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/010/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/011/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/012/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/013/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

IGR<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

MMs<br />

Office<br />

Mayor’s<br />

Office<br />

Speakers<br />

Office<br />

Communit<br />

y Services<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

To foster<br />

intergove<br />

rnmental<br />

relations<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

benchm<br />

arking<br />

and<br />

knowled<br />

ge<br />

sharing<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

to<br />

support<br />

IGR<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

All<br />

Directo<br />

rs<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Quarterl<br />

y IGR<br />

Cluster<br />

s<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

4 1 1 1 1 reports<br />

and<br />

minute<br />

s<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R10<br />

0<br />

000<br />

R25<br />

000<br />

R10<br />

000<br />

R 50<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Improv<br />

ed IGR<br />

GGPP/0<strong>14</strong>/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/015/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

PED R 10<br />

000<br />

CPS R 20<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

GGPP/016/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/017/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

BTO R 50<br />

000<br />

IWS<br />

INTERNA<br />

L<br />

CONTRO<br />

L<br />

Internal<br />

control<br />

controlle<br />

d<br />

environ<br />

ment<br />

human<br />

and<br />

financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

impleme<br />

ntation of<br />

internal<br />

control<br />

measure<br />

s<br />

All<br />

Directo<br />

rs<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

SDBIP<br />

100%<br />

implement<br />

ation of<br />

internal<br />

control<br />

measures<br />

(1)leave<br />

(2)travellin<br />

g<br />

(3)overtime<br />

(4)austerity<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

signed<br />

off<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

R10<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability


525<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/018/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/019/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/020/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/021/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/022/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

OPERA<br />

TION<br />

CLEAN<br />

AUDIT<br />

Risk<br />

Manage<br />

ment<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

Internal<br />

audit<br />

findings<br />

External<br />

audit<br />

findings<br />

Risk<br />

Managem<br />

ent<br />

Risk<br />

assessme<br />

nts<br />

risk<br />

monitorin<br />

g<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

to assess<br />

efficiency<br />

and<br />

effective<br />

ness of<br />

controls<br />

to<br />

address<br />

AG<br />

findings<br />

To<br />

assess<br />

institution<br />

al risks<br />

To<br />

appraise<br />

the<br />

institution<br />

on risks<br />

To<br />

monitor<br />

risk<br />

mitigatio<br />

n<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

Internal<br />

audit<br />

report<br />

External<br />

audit<br />

report<br />

Risk<br />

manage<br />

ment<br />

Report<br />

identifie<br />

d risks<br />

risks<br />

mitigate<br />

d<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

internal<br />

audit<br />

findings<br />

resolved<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

external<br />

audit<br />

findings<br />

addresse<br />

d<br />

percenta<br />

ge risk<br />

manage<br />

ment<br />

issues<br />

resolved<br />

Percenta<br />

ge risk<br />

assessm<br />

ent<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

monitorin<br />

g of risks<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Chief<br />

Audit<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

All<br />

Directo<br />

rs<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Internal<br />

audit<br />

implem<br />

entation<br />

plan<br />

AG<br />

action<br />

plan<br />

Risk<br />

assess<br />

ment<br />

report<br />

Risk<br />

register<br />

s<br />

Risk<br />

register<br />

s<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

100% 10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100% 10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100% 10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100% risk<br />

assessmen<br />

t<br />

conducted(<br />

1)strategic<br />

20%(2)x8<br />

operational<br />

80%<br />

100%<br />

monitoring<br />

of<br />

risks(1)qua<br />

rterly<br />

reports<br />

operational<br />

, processes<br />

and<br />

strategic<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

Risk<br />

Regist<br />

ers<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

R 0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

R 0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

R 0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

sustain<br />

able<br />

busine<br />

ss<br />

operati<br />

ons<br />

sustain<br />

able<br />

busine<br />

ss<br />

operati<br />

ons


526<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/0<strong>23</strong>/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/024/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/025/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

Project<br />

risk<br />

assessme<br />

nt<br />

Asset<br />

Insurance<br />

Security<br />

operation<br />

s<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

to<br />

identify<br />

risks<br />

To<br />

safeguar<br />

d the<br />

assets of<br />

SDM<br />

through<br />

alternativ<br />

e<br />

techniqu<br />

es of risk<br />

transfer<br />

To<br />

safeguar<br />

d SDM<br />

assets,<br />

its<br />

employe<br />

es and<br />

visitors<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

identifie<br />

d risks<br />

Fully<br />

insured<br />

assets<br />

Safegua<br />

rded<br />

Assets<br />

and<br />

employe<br />

es and<br />

visitors<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Financi<br />

al and<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Financi<br />

al and<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

projects<br />

risks<br />

assesses<br />

Percenta<br />

ge of<br />

assets<br />

coverage<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

reduction<br />

in<br />

security<br />

related<br />

incidents<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

projects<br />

docume<br />

nts<br />

insuran<br />

ce<br />

policy<br />

contract<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

Security<br />

Contrac<br />

t<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

100%<br />

projects<br />

risks<br />

assessed<br />

for<br />

sampled<br />

projects<br />

100%<br />

coverage<br />

of<br />

insurable<br />

assets<br />

100%<br />

Safeguard<br />

ed Assets<br />

and<br />

employees<br />

and visitors<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

1 Insura<br />

nce<br />

Policy<br />

Contra<br />

cts<br />

/Sched<br />

ule<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Securit<br />

y<br />

Contra<br />

ct<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 3<br />

000<br />

000<br />

R 17<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

sustain<br />

able<br />

busine<br />

ss<br />

operati<br />

ons<br />

Sustai<br />

nable<br />

Servic<br />

e<br />

Deliver<br />

y<br />

Sustai<br />

nable<br />

Servic<br />

e<br />

Deliver<br />

y and<br />

safe<br />

workin<br />

g<br />

environ<br />

ment


527<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/026/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/027/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

Security<br />

Vetting<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

To<br />

ascertain<br />

the level<br />

of<br />

integrity<br />

of staff<br />

and<br />

service<br />

providers<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

Reduce<br />

d<br />

vulnera<br />

bility<br />

Reduce<br />

d<br />

vulnera<br />

bility<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

impleme<br />

ntation of<br />

vetting<br />

process<br />

for staff<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

impleme<br />

ntation of<br />

vetting<br />

process<br />

for<br />

service<br />

providers<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Security<br />

Policy<br />

Security<br />

Policy<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

100%<br />

Implement<br />

ation of<br />

vetting<br />

process for<br />

staff (1)<br />

Distribution<br />

of vetting<br />

forms-staff<br />

25% (2)<br />

Submissio<br />

n to SSA<br />

25% (3)<br />

Vetting<br />

50%<br />

100%<br />

Implement<br />

ation of<br />

vetting<br />

process for<br />

service<br />

providers<br />

(1)<br />

Develop<br />

terms of<br />

reference<br />

(2)<br />

Procureme<br />

nt of the<br />

system (3)<br />

Subscriptio<br />

n (4)<br />

Vetting<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

25<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Signed<br />

-off<br />

Vetting<br />

report<br />

Signed<br />

-off<br />

Vetting<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Risk<br />

Free<br />

operati<br />

onal<br />

environ<br />

ment<br />

Risk<br />

Free<br />

operati<br />

onal<br />

environ<br />

ment


528<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/028/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/029/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

Anti-<br />

Fraud and<br />

Corruptio<br />

n Hotline<br />

Business<br />

continuity<br />

Managem<br />

ent<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

To stamp<br />

out fraud<br />

and<br />

corruptio<br />

n<br />

activities<br />

To<br />

secure<br />

business<br />

sustaina<br />

bility<br />

(SDM)<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

Reduce<br />

d<br />

vulnera<br />

bility<br />

Resilien<br />

t<br />

Busines<br />

s<br />

Operati<br />

on<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

impleme<br />

ntation of<br />

Anti-<br />

Fraud<br />

and<br />

Corruptio<br />

n Hotline<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

develop<br />

ment<br />

business<br />

continuit<br />

y<br />

manage<br />

ment<br />

plan<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Approv<br />

ed Anti-<br />

Fraud<br />

and<br />

Corrupti<br />

on<br />

Policy<br />

Approv<br />

ed<br />

busines<br />

s<br />

continui<br />

ty<br />

framew<br />

ork<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

100%<br />

Implement<br />

ation Anti-<br />

Fraud and<br />

Corruption<br />

Policy (1)<br />

Tender<br />

Process<br />

25% (2)<br />

Contracting<br />

25% (3)<br />

Awareness<br />

25% (4)<br />

Hotline<br />

25%<br />

100%<br />

developme<br />

nt business<br />

continuity<br />

manageme<br />

nt plan (1)<br />

Business<br />

impact<br />

analysis<br />

25% (2)<br />

Developme<br />

nt of<br />

strategies<br />

25% (3)<br />

Consolidati<br />

on 25% (4)<br />

Draft Plan<br />

25%<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

Hotline R 80<br />

000<br />

Signed<br />

-off<br />

Busine<br />

ss<br />

Contin<br />

uity<br />

Plan<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Public<br />

confide<br />

nce<br />

Sustai<br />

nable<br />

Busine<br />

ss<br />

Operati<br />

ons


529<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/030/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/031/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/032/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/033/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

Special<br />

Program<br />

mes<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

Risk<br />

Managem<br />

ent<br />

Awarenes<br />

s Training<br />

Risk<br />

Managem<br />

ent<br />

Reporting<br />

Excess on<br />

insurance<br />

Youth<br />

Developm<br />

ent<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

To raise<br />

risk<br />

manage<br />

ment<br />

awarene<br />

ss<br />

amongst<br />

staff and<br />

councillor<br />

s<br />

To<br />

coordinat<br />

e and<br />

report on<br />

risk<br />

manage<br />

ment<br />

activities<br />

To<br />

manage<br />

claim<br />

incidents<br />

that<br />

demand<br />

excess<br />

To<br />

integrate<br />

youth in<br />

the<br />

socioeconomi<br />

c<br />

mainstre<br />

am<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

Risk<br />

Averse<br />

culture/<br />

work<br />

environ<br />

ment<br />

Report<br />

Indemni<br />

fied<br />

losses<br />

Integrat<br />

ed<br />

Youth<br />

Develop<br />

ment<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

resourc<br />

e<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

for risk<br />

awarene<br />

ss<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

reports<br />

on risk<br />

manage<br />

ment<br />

generate<br />

d<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

insuranc<br />

e excess<br />

processe<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of youth<br />

initiatives<br />

undertak<br />

en.<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Risk<br />

Officer<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Risk<br />

awaren<br />

ess<br />

training<br />

module<br />

identifie<br />

d<br />

Three<br />

(3)<br />

Reports<br />

100%<br />

Insuran<br />

ce<br />

excess<br />

paid<br />

2012/20<br />

13 - 3<br />

youth<br />

initiative<br />

s held<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

2 initiatives<br />

(1) Officials<br />

(2)<br />

Councillors<br />

Four (4)<br />

Risk<br />

Manageme<br />

nt Reports<br />

100%<br />

Insurance<br />

excess<br />

processed<br />

3 - Youth<br />

activities.<br />

(1). Career<br />

exhibition<br />

(2). Youth<br />

Economic<br />

Summit (3)<br />

Film<br />

Making<br />

Project.<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

0 1 0 1 Exit<br />

Report<br />

1 1 1 1 Signed<br />

-Off<br />

Risk<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Claims<br />

Recor<br />

ds<br />

0 1 1 1 Exit<br />

report<br />

and<br />

conce<br />

pt<br />

docum<br />

ent<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

R<br />

500<br />

000<br />

R30<br />

0<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Sustai<br />

nable<br />

Busine<br />

ss<br />

Operati<br />

ons<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Accou<br />

ntabilit<br />

y<br />

Sustai<br />

nable<br />

Busine<br />

ss<br />

Operati<br />

ons<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Youth<br />

Conditi<br />

ons


530<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/034/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/035/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>020<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/036/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/037/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

Children<br />

Developm<br />

ent<br />

Aged<br />

Advocacy<br />

Program<br />

me<br />

Program<br />

me for<br />

people<br />

living with<br />

disability<br />

Women<br />

and<br />

gender<br />

programm<br />

e<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

To<br />

provide<br />

support<br />

and<br />

advocacy<br />

on<br />

children's<br />

rights<br />

and their<br />

welfare<br />

Ensure<br />

adequate<br />

caring<br />

and<br />

protectio<br />

n of the<br />

elderly<br />

To<br />

impleme<br />

nt<br />

program<br />

mes for<br />

people<br />

living<br />

with<br />

disabilitie<br />

s<br />

To<br />

provide<br />

support<br />

and<br />

advocacy<br />

on<br />

women<br />

and<br />

gender<br />

develop<br />

ment<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

Integrat<br />

ed<br />

Children<br />

Develop<br />

ment<br />

Integrat<br />

ed<br />

Aged<br />

Advoca<br />

cy<br />

Progra<br />

mme<br />

Integrat<br />

ed<br />

Progra<br />

mme for<br />

people<br />

living<br />

with<br />

disabilit<br />

y<br />

Integrat<br />

ed<br />

Women<br />

and<br />

gender<br />

program<br />

me<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

children'<br />

s<br />

initiatives<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of Aged<br />

initiatives<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

for<br />

people<br />

living<br />

with<br />

disability<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertak<br />

en for<br />

women<br />

and<br />

gender<br />

develop<br />

ment<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

2012/20<br />

13 2<br />

Childre<br />

n<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

2012/20<br />

13 3<br />

Aged<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

2012/20<br />

13 4<br />

People<br />

living<br />

with<br />

disabilit<br />

y<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

2012/20<br />

13 2<br />

women<br />

and<br />

gender<br />

develop<br />

ment<br />

initiative<br />

s<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

2 -<br />

Children<br />

initiatives.(<br />

1) National<br />

Children’s<br />

Day (2)<br />

Take a girl<br />

child to<br />

work<br />

3 - (1) x2<br />

Mandela<br />

Day (2) x1<br />

Internation<br />

al Older<br />

Persons<br />

Day<br />

4 - (1) Eye<br />

care (2)<br />

Deaf<br />

awareness<br />

(3)<br />

Disability<br />

(4)<br />

Mental/Brai<br />

lle and<br />

awareness<br />

3 - (1)<br />

Women’s'<br />

Month<br />

Launch (2)<br />

Fun Walk<br />

(3)<br />

Internation<br />

al<br />

women’s<br />

day<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

0 1 0 1 Exit<br />

report<br />

and<br />

conce<br />

pt<br />

docum<br />

ent<br />

2 1 0 0 Exit<br />

report<br />

and<br />

conce<br />

pt<br />

docum<br />

ent<br />

1 2 1 0 Exit<br />

report<br />

and<br />

conce<br />

pt<br />

docum<br />

ent<br />

2 0 1 0 Exit<br />

report<br />

and<br />

conce<br />

pt<br />

docum<br />

ent<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R15<br />

0<br />

000<br />

R25<br />

0<br />

000<br />

R20<br />

0<br />

000<br />

R30<br />

0<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Childre<br />

n<br />

Conditi<br />

ons<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Aged<br />

Conditi<br />

ons<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

People<br />

living<br />

with<br />

disabili<br />

ty<br />

Conditi<br />

ons<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

women<br />

and<br />

gender<br />

Conditi<br />

ons


531<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/038/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/039/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/040/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

Commu<br />

nications<br />

and<br />

media<br />

relations<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

Moral<br />

Regenera<br />

tion<br />

movemen<br />

t<br />

Executive<br />

Support<br />

Traditiona<br />

l<br />

Leadershi<br />

p,<br />

Mayoral<br />

Committe<br />

e, Support<br />

to families<br />

Stakehold<br />

er<br />

engagem<br />

ent<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

To forge<br />

strong<br />

and<br />

sustaina<br />

ble civil<br />

society<br />

partnersh<br />

ips on<br />

constituti<br />

onal<br />

values<br />

To<br />

provide<br />

partnersh<br />

ip and<br />

support<br />

to<br />

Magoshi<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

improved<br />

communi<br />

cation<br />

with<br />

internal<br />

and<br />

external<br />

stakehol<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

Integrat<br />

ed<br />

Society<br />

Integrat<br />

ed<br />

Support<br />

Engage<br />

d<br />

stakehol<br />

der<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

HUMA<br />

N AND<br />

FINACI<br />

AL<br />

RESO<br />

URCE<br />

S<br />

HUMA<br />

N AND<br />

FINACI<br />

AL<br />

RESO<br />

URCE<br />

S<br />

HUMA<br />

N AND<br />

FINACI<br />

AL<br />

RESO<br />

URCE<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

revival of<br />

MRM<br />

Committ<br />

ee<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

support<br />

to<br />

Tradition<br />

al<br />

Leadersh<br />

ip,<br />

Mayoral<br />

Committ<br />

ee,<br />

Support<br />

to<br />

families<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

for<br />

stakehol<br />

ders<br />

engagem<br />

ent<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

No<br />

Baselin<br />

e<br />

2012/20<br />

13 x<strong>14</strong><br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

Consult<br />

ations<br />

2012/20<br />

13 x10<br />

Family<br />

burial<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

100% (1)<br />

revival<br />

MRM<br />

Committee<br />

(50%) (2)<br />

MRM<br />

policy<br />

(25%) (3)<br />

MRM<br />

Programm<br />

e (25%0<br />

100%<br />

Support (1)<br />

Traditional<br />

leaders<br />

(25%) (2)<br />

Mayoral<br />

Committee<br />

(25%) (3)<br />

Vulnerable<br />

Families<br />

(50%)<br />

Eight (8)<br />

Stakeholde<br />

r<br />

engageme<br />

nt<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

50<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resolut<br />

ion<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

2 2 2 2 Exit<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R50<br />

000<br />

R50<br />

0<br />

000<br />

R 3<br />

220<br />

272<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Social<br />

cohesi<br />

on<br />

Social<br />

cohesi<br />

on<br />

Public<br />

Accou<br />

ntabilit<br />

y


532<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/041/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/042/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/043/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

Newslette<br />

r<br />

Marketing<br />

and<br />

branding<br />

Strategic<br />

events<br />

Customer<br />

Satisfactio<br />

n survey<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

ders<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

integrate<br />

d<br />

marketin<br />

g of the<br />

district<br />

Provide<br />

strategic<br />

support<br />

to<br />

Executiv<br />

e Mayor,<br />

enhance<br />

social<br />

cohesion<br />

and<br />

nation<br />

building<br />

To<br />

conduct<br />

a study<br />

on<br />

customer<br />

satisfacti<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

Newslet<br />

ter<br />

Brand<br />

Exposur<br />

e<br />

Integrat<br />

ed<br />

Society<br />

Level of<br />

Custom<br />

er<br />

satisfact<br />

ion<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

newslett<br />

ers<br />

issued<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

initiatives<br />

for<br />

Marketin<br />

g and<br />

branding<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

for<br />

strategic<br />

events<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

customer<br />

satisfacti<br />

on<br />

survey<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong> 4<br />

Newslet<br />

ter<br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Draft<br />

Marketi<br />

ng and<br />

Brandin<br />

g<br />

Strateg<br />

y<br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

2<br />

strategi<br />

c<br />

events<br />

No<br />

Baselin<br />

e<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

8<br />

Newsletter<br />

s (1) x4<br />

Internal (2)<br />

x4 External<br />

100%<br />

initiatives<br />

for<br />

Marketing<br />

and<br />

Branding<br />

(1)<br />

Buildings<br />

(25%) (2)<br />

Events<br />

(50%) (3)<br />

Promotiona<br />

l (25%)<br />

3 - (1)<br />

Heritage<br />

(2)<br />

Excellence<br />

Award (3)<br />

Golf Day<br />

100%<br />

customer<br />

satisfaction<br />

survey (1)<br />

TOR (10%)<br />

(2)<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

2 2 2 2 Newsl<br />

etter<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

1 1 1 0 Exit<br />

report<br />

and<br />

conce<br />

pt<br />

docum<br />

ent<br />

10<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

0 70<br />

%<br />

Custo<br />

mer<br />

satisfa<br />

ction<br />

survey<br />

(Repor<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R<br />

437<br />

342.<br />

25<br />

R 1<br />

200<br />

000<br />

R 50<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Inform<br />

ed<br />

Public<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Publicit<br />

y<br />

Social<br />

cohesi<br />

on<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

public<br />

confide<br />

nce


533<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

on<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Mayor<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

Procureme<br />

nt (20%)(3)<br />

Report<br />

(70%)<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

t)<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

GGPP/044/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/045/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/046/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/047/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Council<br />

Support<br />

Batho<br />

Pele<br />

event<br />

Internatio<br />

nal<br />

relations<br />

Oversight<br />

visits<br />

Implemen<br />

tation of<br />

Council<br />

Activities<br />

To<br />

comply<br />

with<br />

service<br />

standard<br />

s<br />

To foster<br />

internatio<br />

nal<br />

relations<br />

To<br />

maximise<br />

accounta<br />

bility<br />

To<br />

rationalis<br />

e council<br />

activities<br />

Service<br />

conscie<br />

ntisation<br />

Benchm<br />

arking<br />

Oversig<br />

ht<br />

Reports<br />

Annual<br />

Council<br />

Calenda<br />

r<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Number<br />

of Batho<br />

Pele<br />

initiatives<br />

undertak<br />

en<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

Internatio<br />

nal<br />

relations<br />

fostered<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

initiatives<br />

employe<br />

d to<br />

support<br />

oversight<br />

visits/ope<br />

rations<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

compilati<br />

on of<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Office<br />

of the<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Secret<br />

ariat<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Secret<br />

ariat<br />

2012-<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Batho<br />

Pele<br />

Event<br />

2012 -<br />

<strong>2013</strong><br />

Draft<br />

Internati<br />

onal<br />

policy<br />

1 - Batho<br />

Pele Event<br />

100%<br />

Internation<br />

al relations<br />

1. As per<br />

Political<br />

directives<br />

6 visits 100%<br />

(1) Previsits/<br />

Research<br />

25%) (2)<br />

Research<br />

Report<br />

25% (3)<br />

Admin.<br />

Support<br />

25% (4)<br />

Exit Report<br />

25%)<br />

2012/13<br />

Council<br />

calenda<br />

r<br />

100%<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong><br />

Council<br />

Calendar<br />

0 1 0 0 Exit<br />

report<br />

and<br />

conce<br />

pt<br />

docum<br />

ent<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Exit<br />

report<br />

and<br />

conce<br />

pt<br />

docum<br />

ent<br />

Comp<br />

osite<br />

Oversi<br />

ght<br />

reports<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Resolu<br />

tion<br />

R 50<br />

000<br />

R 50<br />

000<br />

R<br />

500<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

public<br />

confide<br />

nce<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Servic<br />

e<br />

Deliver<br />

y<br />

Stakeh<br />

older<br />

satisfa<br />

ction<br />

Inform<br />

ed<br />

Public


534<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

calendar<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

council<br />

calendar<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

GGPP/048/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/049/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Public<br />

Participa<br />

tion<br />

Policy<br />

Developm<br />

ent and/or<br />

review<br />

Council<br />

Outreach<br />

es<br />

To<br />

maximise<br />

complian<br />

ce and<br />

uniformit<br />

y<br />

To<br />

maximise<br />

accounta<br />

bility<br />

Policies<br />

<strong>Review</strong><br />

ed<br />

Exit<br />

Report<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

policies<br />

reviewed<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

employe<br />

d to<br />

support<br />

council<br />

outreach<br />

es<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Secret<br />

ariat<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Secret<br />

ariat<br />

2012/13<br />

policies<br />

(6)<br />

Five (5)<br />

policies(Pu<br />

blic<br />

Participatio<br />

n, Petition,<br />

Ward<br />

Committee<br />

Incentives,<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Ward<br />

Committee<br />

s Forum,<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

MPAC)<br />

Two (2)<br />

initiatives<br />

(1) Draft<br />

Annual<br />

Report (2)<br />

Draft<br />

<strong>IDP</strong>/Budget<br />

(Stakehold<br />

er<br />

identificatio<br />

n,<br />

Logistical<br />

Support,<br />

Exit<br />

Reports)<br />

2 1 1 1 Counci<br />

l<br />

Resolu<br />

tion<br />

0 0 2 0 Counci<br />

l<br />

Resolu<br />

tion<br />

0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

R<br />

395<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Public<br />

Accou<br />

ntabilit<br />

y<br />

Public<br />

Accou<br />

ntabilit<br />

y


535<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/050/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/051/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/052/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/053/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/054/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

Ward<br />

Committe<br />

es<br />

Service<br />

Delivery<br />

Engagem<br />

ents<br />

Budget<br />

Speech<br />

Declaratio<br />

n of<br />

Councillor<br />

s interests<br />

Councillor<br />

s Welfare<br />

Training<br />

of<br />

Councillor<br />

s<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

To<br />

provide<br />

conduciv<br />

e<br />

environm<br />

ent for<br />

councillor<br />

functioni<br />

ng<br />

To<br />

provide<br />

ammuniti<br />

on for<br />

councillor<br />

s<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

Reports<br />

Budget<br />

Speech<br />

Event<br />

Complia<br />

nce<br />

Complia<br />

nce<br />

Skills<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

engagem<br />

ents held<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

facilitatio<br />

n for<br />

budget<br />

speech<br />

event<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

councillo<br />

rs<br />

declarati<br />

ons<br />

processe<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

employe<br />

d for<br />

councillo<br />

rs<br />

welfare<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

councillo<br />

rs trained<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Secret<br />

ariat<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Secret<br />

ariat<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Secret<br />

ariat<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Secret<br />

ariat<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Secret<br />

ariat<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Two (2)<br />

engage<br />

ments<br />

held<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

Two (2)<br />

engageme<br />

nts<br />

100% 100%<br />

(Stakehold<br />

er<br />

mobilisatio<br />

n 50%,<br />

logistical<br />

preparation<br />

s 50%)<br />

49 49<br />

Councillors<br />

declaration<br />

forms<br />

processed<br />

1 1 (Income<br />

Tax Act)<br />

49<br />

councill<br />

ors<br />

trained<br />

49<br />

councillors<br />

trained<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

0 1 0 1 Counci<br />

l<br />

Report<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Resolu<br />

tion<br />

49 0 0 0 Certifie<br />

d<br />

Declar<br />

ation<br />

Forms<br />

0 1 0 0 Attend<br />

ance<br />

Regist<br />

er and<br />

Report<br />

21 21 18 11 Trainin<br />

g<br />

report<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R<br />

300<br />

000<br />

R<br />

350<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

R<br />

350<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Public<br />

Accou<br />

ntabilit<br />

y<br />

Public<br />

Accou<br />

ntabilit<br />

y<br />

Public<br />

Transp<br />

arency<br />

Public<br />

Accou<br />

ntabilit<br />

y<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Servic<br />

e<br />

Deliver<br />

y


536<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

operation<br />

s<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

GGPP/055/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/<br />

Geograph<br />

ic Name<br />

Change<br />

Tracking<br />

of council<br />

resolution<br />

s<br />

To<br />

restore<br />

Nation<br />

identity<br />

to track<br />

council<br />

resolutio<br />

ns<br />

Nationh<br />

ood<br />

identity<br />

resolutio<br />

ns<br />

register<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

employe<br />

d to<br />

coordinat<br />

e<br />

Geograp<br />

hic<br />

Name<br />

Change<br />

process<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

tracking<br />

of<br />

council<br />

resolutio<br />

ns<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Secret<br />

ariat<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Secret<br />

ariat<br />

GNC<br />

Commit<br />

tee<br />

establis<br />

hed,<br />

GNC<br />

Policy<br />

approve<br />

d by<br />

council,<br />

GNC<br />

worksh<br />

op<br />

conduct<br />

ed<br />

No<br />

Baselin<br />

e<br />

Two (2)<br />

initiatives<br />

(1)<br />

Renaming<br />

of<br />

Burgersfort<br />

Town (2)<br />

Naming of<br />

DeHoop<br />

Dam<br />

100%<br />

tracking of<br />

council<br />

resolutions<br />

(1)<br />

resolutions<br />

register (2)<br />

progress<br />

on<br />

implement<br />

ation<br />

1 0 1 0 GNC<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Resolu<br />

tions<br />

Regist<br />

er<br />

R<br />

130<br />

800<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Public<br />

Accou<br />

ntabilit<br />

y<br />

improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability


537<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/056/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/057/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/058/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

Perform<br />

ance<br />

Manage<br />

ment<br />

System<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

PMS<br />

Framewor<br />

k<br />

Performa<br />

nce<br />

Agreemen<br />

ts<br />

<strong>Review</strong>s/<br />

Appraisal<br />

s<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

To<br />

enhance<br />

institution<br />

al<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

culture<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

PMS<br />

Policy<br />

and<br />

framew<br />

ork<br />

Signed<br />

perform<br />

ance<br />

agreem<br />

ents<br />

reviewe<br />

d<br />

perform<br />

ance<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

<strong>Review</strong><br />

of PMS<br />

Framewo<br />

rk<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

commitm<br />

ents<br />

conclude<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

performa<br />

nce<br />

reviews<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

PMS<br />

Policy<br />

and<br />

Framew<br />

ork<br />

signed<br />

section<br />

56<br />

perform<br />

ance<br />

agreem<br />

ents<br />

2<br />

reviews<br />

conduct<br />

ed<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

100%<br />

review of<br />

PMS<br />

Framework<br />

(1) draft<br />

framework<br />

(25%) (2)<br />

staff<br />

comments<br />

(25%)(3)<br />

manageme<br />

nt<br />

comments<br />

(25%)(4)<br />

approval(2<br />

5%)<br />

100%<br />

performanc<br />

e<br />

agreement<br />

s<br />

concluded<br />

(1)Director<br />

s<br />

(2)manage<br />

rs<br />

2<br />

performanc<br />

e reviews<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

25<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

25<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resolut<br />

ion<br />

Signed<br />

perfor<br />

mance<br />

commi<br />

tments<br />

1 1 0 0 Signed<br />

off<br />

perfor<br />

mance<br />

review<br />

s<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R<br />

200<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability


538<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/059/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/060/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/061/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

Institution<br />

al SDBIP<br />

Departme<br />

ntal<br />

SDBIP<br />

Annual<br />

Report<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

To<br />

maximise<br />

accounta<br />

bility and<br />

transpare<br />

ncy to<br />

stakehol<br />

ders<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

SDBIP<br />

Depart<br />

mental<br />

SDBIP<br />

annual<br />

reportin<br />

g<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

institutio<br />

nal<br />

SDBIP<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

Departm<br />

ental<br />

SDBIP<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

compilati<br />

on of<br />

annual<br />

report<br />

2012/201<br />

3<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

SDBIP<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

Depart<br />

mental<br />

SDBPI<br />

2011/20<br />

12<br />

annual<br />

report<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

100%<br />

developme<br />

nt of<br />

institutional<br />

SDBIP (1)<br />

Working<br />

sessions<br />

with<br />

department<br />

s 50%(2)<br />

draft<br />

institutional<br />

SDBIP<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2015<br />

50%<br />

100%<br />

developme<br />

nt of<br />

Departmen<br />

tal SDBIP<br />

(1) working<br />

sessions<br />

with<br />

department<br />

s 50% (2)<br />

draft<br />

department<br />

al SDBIP's<br />

50%<br />

100%<br />

compilation<br />

of annual<br />

report<br />

2012/<strong>2013</strong><br />

(1)data<br />

collection<br />

30%(2)draf<br />

t annual<br />

report<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

30<br />

%<br />

Signed<br />

off<br />

SDBIP<br />

by<br />

Execut<br />

ive<br />

Mayor<br />

Signed<br />

off<br />

depart<br />

mental<br />

SDBIP<br />

's<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resolut<br />

ion<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability


539<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

50%(3)<br />

submission<br />

to council<br />

20%<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

GGPP/062/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/063/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

Integrate<br />

d<br />

Develop<br />

ment<br />

Plan<br />

Complian<br />

ce<br />

Reporting<br />

Project<br />

site visits<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

Framewor<br />

k<br />

To<br />

undertak<br />

e<br />

projects<br />

site visits<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

Integrate<br />

d<br />

Develop<br />

ment<br />

Planning<br />

complia<br />

nce<br />

reportin<br />

g<br />

site<br />

reports<br />

coordin<br />

ated<br />

planning<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

complian<br />

ce<br />

reports<br />

submitte<br />

d<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

projects<br />

site visits<br />

conducte<br />

d<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

compilati<br />

on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />

Framewo<br />

rk<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

20<br />

complia<br />

nce<br />

reports<br />

No<br />

Baselin<br />

e<br />

2012/20<br />

12<br />

process<br />

plan<br />

20<br />

compliance<br />

reports<br />

(1)x4LGTA<br />

S<br />

(2)x4MTAS<br />

(3)x8<br />

monthly<br />

(4) x4<br />

quarterly<br />

4 projects<br />

site visits<br />

conducted<br />

5 5 5 5 Signed<br />

off<br />

reports<br />

1 1 1 1 signed<br />

off<br />

reports<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resolut<br />

ion<br />

R<br />

800<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

improv<br />

ed<br />

accoun<br />

tability<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

alignm<br />

ent<br />

and<br />

coordin<br />

ation


540<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> REF<br />

NO.<br />

GGPP/064/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

GGPP/065/<br />

<strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRAT<br />

EGIC<br />

PROJE<br />

CTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJEC<br />

TS<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

Process<br />

Plan<br />

<strong>Review</strong>s<br />

OBJECT<br />

IVES<br />

OUTPU<br />

TS<br />

Process<br />

plan<br />

<strong>Review</strong><br />

ed <strong>IDP</strong><br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

human<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

financi<br />

al<br />

resourc<br />

es<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

percenta<br />

ge<br />

compilati<br />

on of <strong>IDP</strong><br />

Process<br />

plan<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

review of<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIA<br />

N<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

BASEL<br />

INE<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

2012/20<br />

13<br />

Process<br />

plan<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<br />

<strong>14</strong> <strong>IDP</strong><br />

<strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGET<br />

ANNUAL<br />

TARGETS<br />

100%<br />

compilation<br />

of <strong>IDP</strong><br />

Process<br />

plan<br />

100%<br />

<strong>Review</strong> of<br />

<strong>IDP</strong> (1)<br />

Status quo<br />

report<br />

40%(2)<br />

draft <strong>IDP</strong><br />

40%(3)<br />

Adoption<br />

20%<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

0<br />

%<br />

40<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

40<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

council<br />

resolut<br />

ion<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resolut<br />

ion<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

alignm<br />

ent<br />

and<br />

coordin<br />

ation<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

alignm<br />

ent<br />

and<br />

coordin<br />

ation<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNU<br />

AL<br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS


541<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

FV/001<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

FV/002<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

Treasu<br />

ry<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

Budget<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

Capital<br />

Replac<br />

ement<br />

reserv<br />

e<br />

Budget<br />

prepar<br />

ation<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

sufficien<br />

t<br />

reserve<br />

funds to<br />

address<br />

asset<br />

renewal<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

prepara<br />

tion and<br />

implem<br />

entation<br />

of<br />

realistic<br />

budget<br />

for the<br />

municip<br />

ality<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Ringfenced<br />

cash<br />

backe<br />

d fund<br />

Credibl<br />

e<br />

Budget<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Financi<br />

al and<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

Improve<br />

ment in<br />

capital<br />

replacem<br />

ent<br />

reserve<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

realistic<br />

and<br />

credible<br />

budget<br />

prepared<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

Budget<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

(0%)<br />

Budget<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

(0%)<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNU<br />

AL<br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

8%<br />

improv<br />

ement<br />

in<br />

capital<br />

replace<br />

ment<br />

reserve<br />

(R7<br />

000<br />

000)<br />

100%<br />

realisti<br />

c and<br />

credibl<br />

e<br />

budget<br />

prepar<br />

ed<br />

(1)<br />

Cash<br />

backed<br />

30%<br />

(2)<br />

Timelin<br />

ess<br />

30%<br />

(3)<br />

Amend<br />

ments<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

2%<br />

R1<br />

698<br />

000<br />

3<br />

%<br />

R2<br />

65<br />

1<br />

00<br />

0<br />

0% 0<br />

%<br />

3<br />

%<br />

R2<br />

65<br />

1<br />

00<br />

0<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Report<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

Resolu<br />

tion<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R 7<br />

000<br />

000<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

R 0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Viability<br />

for<br />

infrastr<br />

ucture<br />

sustain<br />

ability<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Viability<br />

for<br />

service<br />

delivery


542<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNU<br />

AL<br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

made<br />

(X2)<br />

40%<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

FV/003<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Operat<br />

ion<br />

Clean<br />

Audit<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Audit<br />

opinio<br />

n<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

improve<br />

d audit<br />

opinion<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

Audit<br />

Opinio<br />

n<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

improve<br />

ment of<br />

audit<br />

opinion<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

Disclai<br />

mer<br />

audit<br />

100%<br />

improv<br />

ement<br />

of audit<br />

opinion<br />

1.<br />

Addres<br />

sing<br />

prior<br />

year<br />

audit<br />

issues<br />

(50%)<br />

2.<br />

Strengt<br />

hening<br />

internal<br />

control<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Qualifi<br />

ed<br />

Audit<br />

Opinio<br />

n<br />

R<br />

331<br />

644<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Public<br />

confide<br />

nce


543<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNU<br />

AL<br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

s<br />

(50%)<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

FV/004<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Asset<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

Asset<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

that<br />

asset<br />

and<br />

inventor<br />

y are<br />

adequat<br />

ely<br />

account<br />

ed for,<br />

properly<br />

recorde<br />

d and<br />

safegua<br />

rded<br />

Compli<br />

ant<br />

Fixed<br />

Asset<br />

Regist<br />

er<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Percenta<br />

ge GRAP<br />

complian<br />

t fixed<br />

asset<br />

register<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

Movabl<br />

e asset<br />

register<br />

100%<br />

GRAP<br />

compli<br />

ant<br />

asset<br />

register<br />

(Unbun<br />

dled<br />

Assets<br />

30%,<br />

Safegu<br />

arding<br />

movabl<br />

e and<br />

immov<br />

able<br />

assets<br />

20%,<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Fixed<br />

Asset<br />

Regist<br />

er<br />

R 6<br />

890<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Effectiv<br />

e and<br />

efficient<br />

service<br />

delivery


544<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNU<br />

AL<br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

dispos<br />

als<br />

10%,<br />

valuati<br />

on<br />

30%,<br />

records<br />

keepin<br />

g 10%)<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

FV/005<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Invent<br />

ory<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

(Store<br />

s and<br />

Materi<br />

al)<br />

Invent<br />

ory<br />

Regist<br />

er<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

updated<br />

inventory<br />

register<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

50%<br />

complia<br />

nt<br />

invento<br />

ry<br />

register<br />

80%<br />

update<br />

d<br />

invento<br />

ry<br />

register<br />

(purch<br />

ases<br />

30%,<br />

valuati<br />

on<br />

20%,<br />

dispos<br />

als 5%,<br />

record<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Update<br />

d<br />

Invent<br />

ory<br />

Regist<br />

er<br />

R 1<br />

300<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Enhanc<br />

ed<br />

revenu<br />

e<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

(Reven<br />

ue and<br />

asset<br />

manag<br />

ement)


545<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNU<br />

AL<br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

keepin<br />

g 10%,<br />

safegu<br />

arding<br />

15%)<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

FV/006<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Expen<br />

diture<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

Docum<br />

ent<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

prudent<br />

expendi<br />

ture<br />

manage<br />

ment<br />

Safegu<br />

arded<br />

Docum<br />

ents<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

documen<br />

ts<br />

scanned<br />

and filed<br />

as per<br />

process<br />

plan<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

hard<br />

copies<br />

of<br />

docum<br />

ents<br />

100%<br />

docum<br />

ents<br />

scanne<br />

d and<br />

filed as<br />

per<br />

proces<br />

s plan<br />

(electro<br />

nic<br />

filing<br />

50%,<br />

manual<br />

filing<br />

50%)<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Electro<br />

nic<br />

Report<br />

on<br />

scanne<br />

d<br />

docum<br />

ents<br />

R0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Sound<br />

financia<br />

l<br />

manag<br />

ement


546<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

FV/007<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

FV/008<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

Expen<br />

diture<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

Reven<br />

ue<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

(Cost<br />

Recov<br />

ery)<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

proper<br />

manage<br />

ment of<br />

docume<br />

nts<br />

to<br />

ensure<br />

accurat<br />

e and<br />

complet<br />

e<br />

reportin<br />

g of<br />

financial<br />

informat<br />

ion<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Accura<br />

te and<br />

timely<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

Credibl<br />

e<br />

Custo<br />

mer<br />

Datab<br />

ase<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

HUMA<br />

N<br />

RESO<br />

URCE<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge of<br />

creditors<br />

reconcile<br />

d and<br />

paid<br />

within 30<br />

days of<br />

invoice<br />

date<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

consume<br />

r and<br />

indigent<br />

data<br />

collected<br />

and<br />

cleansed<br />

for five<br />

(5)<br />

areas/vill<br />

ages<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

annual<br />

expend<br />

iture<br />

reconcil<br />

iations<br />

financia<br />

l<br />

system<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNU<br />

AL<br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

100%<br />

creditor<br />

s and<br />

paid<br />

within<br />

30<br />

days of<br />

invoice<br />

(reconc<br />

iliation<br />

50%<br />

and<br />

payme<br />

nts<br />

50%)<br />

100%<br />

consu<br />

mer<br />

and<br />

indigen<br />

t data<br />

collect<br />

ed and<br />

cleans<br />

ed for<br />

five (5)<br />

areas<br />

(Data<br />

collecti<br />

on<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0% 50<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Report<br />

Indige<br />

nt<br />

Regist<br />

er<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

R0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

R0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Public<br />

and<br />

busines<br />

s<br />

confide<br />

nce<br />

Enhanc<br />

ed<br />

revenu<br />

e<br />

manag<br />

ement


547<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNU<br />

AL<br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

50%,<br />

indigen<br />

t<br />

register<br />

50%)<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

FV/009<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Reven<br />

ue<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

Reven<br />

ue<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

sufficien<br />

t<br />

revenue<br />

to<br />

address<br />

develop<br />

ment<br />

imperati<br />

ves.<br />

Increa<br />

sed<br />

collecti<br />

on<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

revenue<br />

collected<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

58%<br />

collecti<br />

on rate<br />

40%<br />

revenu<br />

e<br />

collect<br />

ed<br />

(R15<br />

076<br />

959)<br />

Q1.<br />

R897<br />

600<br />

Q2. R4<br />

501<br />

600<br />

Q3. R2<br />

<strong>23</strong>5<br />

200<br />

Q4. R7<br />

2<br />

%<br />

12<br />

%<br />

6<br />

%<br />

20<br />

%<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Report<br />

R 8<br />

477<br />

000<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Viability


548<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNU<br />

AL<br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

442<br />

592<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

FV/010<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Supply<br />

Chain<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

Dema<br />

nd<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

the<br />

optimu<br />

m,<br />

efficient<br />

,<br />

effectiv<br />

e<br />

function<br />

al<br />

Effecti<br />

ve and<br />

efficien<br />

t<br />

procur<br />

ement<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

develop<br />

ment of<br />

procurem<br />

ent plans<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

Budget<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

(0%)<br />

100%<br />

develo<br />

pment<br />

of<br />

procur<br />

ement<br />

plans<br />

(procur<br />

ement<br />

plans)<br />

0<br />

%<br />

0% 0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Procur<br />

ement<br />

plans<br />

for all<br />

depart<br />

ments<br />

R0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

service<br />

delivery


549<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

FV/011<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

FV/012<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

Acquis<br />

ition<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

Contra<br />

ct<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

procure<br />

ment<br />

process<br />

es<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

efficient<br />

and<br />

effectiv<br />

e<br />

contract<br />

manage<br />

ment<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Supply<br />

Chain<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

Credibl<br />

e<br />

contra<br />

ct<br />

registe<br />

r<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

reduction<br />

of<br />

irregular<br />

expendit<br />

ure from<br />

baseline<br />

Percenta<br />

ge SLA's<br />

available<br />

and<br />

updated<br />

on the<br />

contract<br />

register<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

AG<br />

Finding<br />

s on<br />

expend<br />

iture<br />

irregula<br />

rities<br />

50%<br />

update<br />

d<br />

contrac<br />

t<br />

register<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNU<br />

AL<br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

100%<br />

reducti<br />

on of<br />

irregula<br />

r<br />

expend<br />

iture<br />

from<br />

baselin<br />

e<br />

(adher<br />

ence to<br />

full<br />

SCM<br />

policies<br />

and<br />

regulati<br />

ons<br />

100%)<br />

100%<br />

availab<br />

le and<br />

update<br />

d<br />

contrac<br />

t<br />

register<br />

(draftin<br />

g of<br />

SLA<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

100<br />

%<br />

100<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Unauth<br />

orised<br />

Irregul<br />

ar<br />

Fruitle<br />

ss<br />

Expen<br />

diture<br />

(UIF)<br />

Regist<br />

er<br />

Update<br />

d<br />

contra<br />

ct<br />

registe<br />

r<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

R0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

R0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

Public<br />

confide<br />

nce<br />

Sound<br />

Admini<br />

stration


550<br />

FINANCIAL VIABILITY <strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong> SDBIP<br />

KPA 5: FINANCIAL VIABILITY<br />

OUTCOME : Improved financial viability and compliance to Finance Management Legislations<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

STRA<br />

TEGIC<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

SUB-<br />

PROJ<br />

ECTS<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPUT<br />

S<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

ANNU<br />

AL<br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

50%<br />

and<br />

register<br />

updatin<br />

g 50%)<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EVIDE<br />

NCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPAC<br />

TS<br />

FV/013<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

FV/0<strong>14</strong><br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

Report<br />

ing<br />

Expen<br />

diture<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

To<br />

ensure<br />

account<br />

ability<br />

To curb<br />

expendi<br />

ture<br />

varianc<br />

e at 5%<br />

Compli<br />

ance<br />

with all<br />

regulat<br />

ions<br />

Manag<br />

ed<br />

budget<br />

Human<br />

Resour<br />

ce<br />

Human<br />

and<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Resour<br />

ces<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

complian<br />

ce<br />

reports<br />

generate<br />

d<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

complian<br />

ce to<br />

acceptab<br />

le<br />

variance<br />

Chief<br />

Financi<br />

al<br />

Officer<br />

All<br />

Directo<br />

rs<br />

Section<br />

52,71,7<br />

2 and<br />

AFS<br />

No<br />

baselin<br />

e<br />

5<br />

Report<br />

s<br />

(Sectio<br />

n 71,<br />

Section<br />

52,<br />

Supply<br />

Chain,<br />

CIDB,<br />

Section<br />

72,<br />

AFS)<br />

5%<br />

varianc<br />

e<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

100<br />

.0%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5% 5<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

5<br />

%<br />

Counci<br />

l<br />

resoluti<br />

on<br />

Expen<br />

diture<br />

reports<br />

R 0 E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Sound<br />

financia<br />

l<br />

manag<br />

ement<br />

Sound<br />

financia<br />

l<br />

manag<br />

ement


551<br />

SPATIAL RATIONALE SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 6 : SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

SR/001<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

SR/002<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

SR/003<br />

/<strong>2013</strong>-<br />

20<strong>14</strong><br />

Strate<br />

gic<br />

Project<br />

s<br />

Growt<br />

h<br />

Manag<br />

ement<br />

Sub<br />

Project<br />

s<br />

Constr<br />

uction<br />

of<br />

munici<br />

pal<br />

offices<br />

GIS<br />

Trainin<br />

g and<br />

Hardw<br />

are<br />

Land<br />

Audit<br />

for<br />

municip<br />

al<br />

works<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

Provisio<br />

n of<br />

municip<br />

al office<br />

space<br />

GIS<br />

Training<br />

and<br />

Hardwar<br />

e<br />

Underta<br />

ke land<br />

audit for<br />

municip<br />

al works<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

Improv<br />

ed<br />

district<br />

spatial<br />

plannin<br />

g<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

Huma<br />

n and<br />

Finan<br />

cial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Huma<br />

n and<br />

Finan<br />

cial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Huma<br />

n and<br />

Finan<br />

cial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

facilitatio<br />

n of<br />

Mampuru<br />

township<br />

developm<br />

ent<br />

Number<br />

of local<br />

and<br />

district<br />

staff<br />

trained<br />

on GIS<br />

Percenta<br />

ge<br />

completio<br />

n of land<br />

audit for<br />

municipal<br />

works<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

SG<br />

Diagra<br />

m and<br />

valuatio<br />

n<br />

Report<br />

Draft<br />

GIS<br />

Strateg<br />

y<br />

Spatial<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Frame<br />

work<br />

20<strong>14</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

100%<br />

facilitat<br />

ion of<br />

Mamp<br />

uru<br />

townsh<br />

ip<br />

develo<br />

pment<br />

10<br />

local<br />

and<br />

district<br />

staff<br />

trained<br />

on GIS<br />

100%<br />

compl<br />

etion<br />

of land<br />

audit<br />

for<br />

munici<br />

pal<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

25<br />

%<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

50<br />

%<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

75<br />

%<br />

Q4<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

EVID<br />

ENCE<br />

Com<br />

munit<br />

y<br />

Resol<br />

ution<br />

0 5 0 5 Annu<br />

al<br />

Traini<br />

ng<br />

Repor<br />

t<br />

25<br />

%<br />

50<br />

%<br />

75<br />

%<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

Land<br />

audit<br />

report<br />

for<br />

munic<br />

ipal<br />

works<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

R869<br />

,262<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

IMPACTS<br />

Sustainab<br />

le Spatial<br />

Rationale<br />

Sustainab<br />

le Spatial<br />

Rationale<br />

Sustainab<br />

le Spatial<br />

Rationale


552<br />

SPATIAL RATIONALE SDBIP <strong>2013</strong>-20<strong>14</strong><br />

KPA 6 : SPATIAL RATIONALE<br />

<strong>IDP</strong><br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

Strate<br />

gic<br />

Project<br />

s<br />

Sub<br />

Project<br />

s<br />

OBJEC<br />

TIVES<br />

OUTP<br />

UTS<br />

INPU<br />

TS<br />

PERFRO<br />

MANCE<br />

INDICAT<br />

ORS<br />

INDIC<br />

ATOR<br />

CUST<br />

ODIAN<br />

2012/2<br />

013<br />

BASEL<br />

INES<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/2<br />

0<strong>14</strong><br />

TARG<br />

ETS<br />

works<br />

Q<br />

1<br />

Q<br />

2<br />

Q<br />

3<br />

Q4<br />

EVID<br />

ENCE<br />

BUD<br />

GET<br />

FUN<br />

DER<br />

IMPACTS<br />

De<br />

Hoop<br />

Mampu<br />

ru<br />

To<br />

facilitate<br />

impleme<br />

ntation<br />

of De<br />

Hoop<br />

housing<br />

project<br />

to<br />

facilitate<br />

Mampur<br />

u<br />

Townshi<br />

p<br />

Develop<br />

ment<br />

Houses<br />

Land<br />

secure<br />

d<br />

Huma<br />

n and<br />

Finan<br />

cial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Huma<br />

n and<br />

Finan<br />

cial<br />

Reso<br />

urces<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertak<br />

en to<br />

facilitate<br />

De Hoop<br />

Housing<br />

project<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

initiatives<br />

undertak<br />

en to<br />

facilitate<br />

Mampuru<br />

township<br />

developm<br />

ent<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

Directo<br />

r<br />

Planni<br />

ng and<br />

Econo<br />

mic<br />

Develo<br />

pment<br />

meetin<br />

gs held<br />

meetin<br />

gs held<br />

12<br />

initiativ<br />

es<br />

undert<br />

aken<br />

4<br />

initiativ<br />

es<br />

undert<br />

aken<br />

3 3 3 3 Repor<br />

ts and<br />

minut<br />

es<br />

1 1 1 1 Repor<br />

ts and<br />

minut<br />

es<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

E-<br />

Shar<br />

e<br />

Intergover<br />

nmental<br />

relations<br />

Intergover<br />

nmental<br />

relations


553<br />

ANNEXURE B<br />

SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />

ADOPTED ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE<br />

<strong>2013</strong>/<strong>14</strong>


554<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE: <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> -2015/2016<br />

The proposed organisational structure is made of 1122 posts from 1080 posts. There is an<br />

increase of 42 posts from 1080. There are 789 funded posts available. There are a total of 342<br />

vacant posts in the proposed organisational structure of which nine (9) are funded. The<br />

remaining 329 posts will be funded during the financial year <strong>2013</strong>/20<strong>14</strong> based on their strategic<br />

functioning and availability of funds. The remainder of the vacant post will be funded in the<br />

ensuing Integrated Development Plan cycle.<br />

The major focus of the proposed organizational structure is the strengthening of Budget and<br />

Treasury, Community Services and Infrastructure & Water Services. In Budget and Treasury the<br />

focus is mainly on billing. The intention of the municipality is to take over billing from local<br />

municipalities and general financial management with special attention to improving internal<br />

controls. In Community Services there are two issues that require attention, mainly compliance<br />

and capacity enhancement. A new division responsible for disaster management is proposed to<br />

ensure segregation of duties between disaster management and emergency services. In<br />

addition more staff is required in emergency services to address acute shortage of staff and<br />

address compliance issues.<br />

The provision of reliable water services depends on the capacity of infrastructure and water<br />

services. To ensure that requisite capacity is available, additional post of pump operators and<br />

plump operators are suggested. This number of pump operators will address the shortage of<br />

man power which is currently provided by volunteers.<br />

Furthermore the draft organisational structure suggests the relocation of Fleet and Facilities<br />

from Budget and Treasury to Corporate Services. In addition Payroll is suggested to be<br />

relocated from Corporate Services to Budget and Treasury.<br />

Below is the elaborate for additional posts per department:<br />

9. OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER<br />

There is no new position proposed.<br />

10. MUNICIPAL MANAGER `S OFFICE<br />

There are 3 new proposed posts:<br />

· The post of Manager is proposed to deal with organizational performance and<br />

performance of the Executive Management.<br />

· The post of Senior Internal Officer is proposed to deal with IT and regulatory audit.


555<br />

· The additional post of Internal Auditor is proposed to enhance the capacity of the internal<br />

audit unit to handle their functions accurately.<br />

11. OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR<br />

There are 16 new positions proposed:<br />

· The post of Manager is proposed to deal with customer care. The rationale for the<br />

proposal is that issues on query management have been elevated.<br />

· The post of Marketing Officer is proposed to handle the marketing functions which were<br />

previously located in the department of planning and Economic Development.<br />

· The position of Website Development is proposed to ensure that website is properly<br />

managed. The function of website administration was moved from corporate services<br />

office to the Executive Mayor’s Office.<br />

· The post of photographer is proposed to provide expertise in the production of<br />

newsletters.<br />

· The post of Communication Officer is abolished and replaced by the post of the<br />

Marketing Officer.<br />

· The post of the Head of Security is proposed to provide for the security details of the<br />

Executive Mayor.<br />

· The post of Policy and IGR is proposed to deal with the Policy and IGR conditions.<br />

These areas did not have a dictated unit to handle.<br />

· The additional nine posts of call centre operators are proposed to provide for 24 hour<br />

services in line with requirements of the function.<br />

· The new post of Call Centre Officer is proposed to control room.<br />

12. CORPORATE SERVICES<br />

There are 12 new post proposed:<br />

· The post of OD Officer is proposed to have the required capacity to deal with the job<br />

evaluation function. The process of evaluating jobs is quiet demanding and requires<br />

dedicated personnel. As the district we are going to handle job evaluation for all the five<br />

local municipalities.<br />

· The function of individual PMS is relocating from Corporate Services to Planning and<br />

Economic Development.<br />

· The additional post of Labour Relations Officer is proposed to complement the unit.<br />

Currently there are two Officers and there is an official seconded to help in the division.<br />

· The post of IT Technician is proposed to capacitate the division. There is a project to<br />

extend the IT Infrastructure to all the regional offices and depots and this will require<br />

additional hands.


556<br />

· The post of Training Officer is proposed to help in dealing with some of the neglected<br />

functions of training namely, assessment of the impact of training interventions.<br />

· The additional post of EAP Officer is proposed to increase the capacity of the Unit to<br />

assist dealing with the welfare of the employees. Currently there is one EAP Officer and<br />

she is not coping with the demands of the organization.<br />

· The post of OHS clerk is proposed to ensure that compliance with OHS is met. Currently<br />

there is no OHS Clerk who must attend to all OHS requirements in all the work stations.<br />

· The post of Senior Facility Officer, Fleet Officer, two Facility Clerks are proposed to<br />

augment the section. Furthermore two posts of general workers are proposed to help the<br />

handyman to deal with maintenance work.<br />

13. COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

There are 33 new post proposed:<br />

· The two posts of Disaster Officers are proposed to ensure that disaster management is<br />

undertaken in all the five (5) Local Municipalities.<br />

· The post of Principal is proposed to ensure that there is accountability on the part of the<br />

training academy.<br />

· The post of the Chief Fire Inspector is proposed to comply with the fire act and also to<br />

deal with the demands of the farming community and rapid industrialisation in the<br />

distinct.<br />

· The eight additional posts of Leading Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum<br />

shifts.<br />

· The eight additional posts of Senior Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum shifts.<br />

· The eight additional post of Fire Fighters are proposed to create optimum shifts<br />

<strong>14</strong>. INFRASTRUCTURE AND WATER SERVICES<br />

There are 243 new proposed posts. The majority of the posts are pump operators and<br />

plant Operators. Special focus is also paid to enforcement of municipal regulations, thus<br />

a creation of a post to administer water authority issues.<br />

· The post of Deputy Director Water Authority is proposed, 2 Secretaries for administration<br />

of the two deputy directors.<br />

· The Division Regulation and Governance is proposed to be under the Water<br />

Authority Sub-department, 1Manager, 2Monitoring and Evaluation Officer, furthermore<br />

the division of Strategic Planning is suggested with newly created positions of 2<br />

Technicians.<br />

· The PMU division proposed 1 Senior Project Manager and 1 Data Capturer.


557<br />

· The Water Provider sub-department under Bulk Operations division suggested 8<br />

positions that are dependent on section 78 process.<br />

· The Reticulation and Sanitation Division suggested 3 Artisan Plumbers,3 General<br />

Worker and 5 Admin clerk for administration of the Regional offices.<br />

· The 167 new posts of pump operators are proposed to ensure that there is a reliable<br />

water provision. Currently the function is performed by volunteers and this proposal is<br />

aimed at dealing with issues of volunteers to create sustainability<br />

· The 46 new posts of plant operators are proposed to enhance the capacity of the<br />

municipality to provide continuous operation of water treatment works and wastewater<br />

treatment works.<br />

· The Scientific Services suggested 1 Lab Technician and 1 Lab Assistant<br />

· The Electro Mechanical Division suggested 1 Admin Clerk for administration purpose.<br />

15. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />

There are 3 proposed new positions:<br />

· There is a new division named <strong>IDP</strong> and PMS, therefore a Manager and 1 <strong>IDP</strong> Officer<br />

post are proposed. The migrating function of PMS from Corporate services will be<br />

performed in this division.<br />

· The post of LED officer is proposed to deal with tourism.<br />

16. BUDGET AND TREASURY<br />

There are 38 proposed new posts:<br />

· The two additional posts of Accountants are proposed, one Accountant will deal with<br />

AFS and reporting.<br />

· The additional post of billing clerk is proposed to provide an additional capacity<br />

· The two additional posts of Credit Control Clerk are proposed to increase capacity to<br />

cope with the demands<br />

· The post of Indigent Clerk is proposed to enhance the capacity became the port<br />

· The two additional post of Data Capturers are proposed to capture information from<br />

meter readers<br />

· The post of Chief Meter Reader is proposed to enhance capacity for implementation of<br />

water services, particularly billing.<br />

· The twenty new post of meter readers are proposed to ensure that the takeover of billing<br />

function from local municipalities is properly handled and also the extension of billing to<br />

new areas are explored.<br />

· The additional post of Cashier is proposed to increase capacity.


558<br />

· The new post of Accounting Clerk is proposed to deal with filing of all vat returns,<br />

reconciliations and invoice files and preparation of audit files for all account balances<br />

within the trial Balance.<br />

· The additional post of Senior Procurement Officer is proposed to deal with demand and<br />

performance Management.<br />

· The additional post of Asset Officer is proposed to assist with the reconciliation of stock<br />

counts and asset register.<br />

· The five new post of Stores Clerks are proposed to assist the regional Offices


559<br />

COUNCIL<br />

EXECUTIVE MAYOR OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER OFFICE OF THE CHIEF WHIP


560<br />

OFFICE OF THE SPEAKER<br />

Purpose: To provide support to the Speaker’s<br />

Office.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Render administration support.<br />

1x Council Secretary<br />

1x Personal Assistant<br />

1 x Secretary (Whippery)<br />

DIVISION: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

Purpose: To facilitate public participation and<br />

public relations.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordinate public participation and stakeholder<br />

engagement.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Public Participation Officer<br />

3x Public Participation Coordinator<br />

DIVISION:COUNCIL SECRETARIAT<br />

Purpose: To render Council Secretariat Services<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Provide support to council<br />

2. Maintain records for council<br />

3. Provide secretariat services to council<br />

1 x Manager<br />

1 x Senior Admin Officer<br />

1 x Admin Officer<br />

5 x Committee Coordinator<br />

DIVISION:COUNCILOR SUPPORT<br />

Purpose: To render support to Councilors<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordinate capacity building & councilor welfare<br />

1 x Manager<br />

1 x Councilor Welfare Specialist<br />

1 x Councilor Welfare Coordinator<br />

1 x Researcher<br />

1 x Legal Officer


561<br />

OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER<br />

PURPOSE : To provide strategic administrative support to the council<br />

and ensure legislative compliant environment.<br />

FUNCTIONS:<br />

1.Monitor effectiveness of service delivery departments.<br />

1.1 Community services.<br />

1.2 Infrastructure and water services.<br />

1.3 Planning and economic development.<br />

2.Monitor effectiveness of support departments.<br />

2.1 Executive mayor's office<br />

2.2 Corporate services<br />

2.3 Budget and treasury<br />

1x Municipal Manager<br />

1x Chief Operations Officer<br />

1x Personal Assistant<br />

1x Secretary<br />

INTERNAL AUDIT<br />

Purpose: To provide an independant,<br />

objective assurance and consulting<br />

activity designed to add value and<br />

improve an organisation controls, risk<br />

management and governance processes.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Regularity audits.<br />

2. Performance audits.<br />

3.Information systems /IT audits.<br />

4.Investigation and adhok.<br />

1x Chief Audit Executive<br />

2x Senior Internal Auditor (1 new)<br />

4x Internal Auditor (1new)<br />

RISK MANAGEMENT<br />

Purpose: To manage the risk<br />

management function in line with<br />

corporate management strategy.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Risk assesment.<br />

2.Risk financing.<br />

3.Anti fraud & corruptions.<br />

4.Complaince management.<br />

5.Risk control.<br />

1x Chief Risk Officer<br />

2x Senior Risk Officer<br />

2x Risk Officer<br />

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT<br />

Purpose: To coordinate PMS for section<br />

56 employees.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Facilitate employment contracts and<br />

performance agreement.<br />

2.Coordinate quartely, mid year and<br />

annual reviews.<br />

3.Liase with sector departments for<br />

statutory reporting requirements.<br />

1x Manager (new)<br />

Executive<br />

Mayor's<br />

Office<br />

Corporate<br />

Services<br />

Community<br />

Services<br />

Infrastructure<br />

& Water<br />

Services<br />

Planning &<br />

Economic<br />

Development<br />

Budget &<br />

Treasury


562<br />

DEPARTMENT: EXECUTIVE MAYOR'S<br />

OFFICE<br />

Purpose: To provide executive support services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1.Monitor the implementation and impact of special<br />

programmes.<br />

2.Manage communications services.<br />

3.Render administrative support to the Executive Mayor.<br />

4. Render customer care services.<br />

1x Director<br />

1x Personal Assistant<br />

1x Secretary<br />

DIVISION: SPECIAL PROGRAMMES<br />

Purpose: To monitor the implementation and<br />

impact of special programmes.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Provide strategic linkages for special programmes.<br />

2.Facilitate youth, children and woman development<br />

programs.<br />

3. Facilitate gender empowerment programs.<br />

4. Advocate for intergration of people living with<br />

disabilities in the economic and social mainstream.<br />

1x Manager<br />

2x Special Programme Officer<br />

DIVISION: COMMUNICATIONS<br />

Purpose:To manage communications services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Monitor effective communication and marketing services.<br />

2. Promote public relations .<br />

3. Coordinate event management.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Media Liaison Officer<br />

1x Marketing Officer (new)<br />

2x Events Officer<br />

2x Community Liason Officer<br />

1x Website Development Officer (new)<br />

1x Photographer (new)<br />

1x Graphic Designer<br />

DIVISION: EXECUTIVE SUPPORT<br />

Purpose: To render administrative support to the Executive Mayor.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordinate and liaise with external stakeholders on behalf of the<br />

Executive Mayor.<br />

2. Facilitate executive support for the Executive Mayor and Mayoral<br />

committee.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Spokesperson<br />

1x Head of Security (new)<br />

2x Protocol Officer (1new)<br />

1x Policy & IGR Officer (new)<br />

2x Chauffer<br />

6x Secretary (MMC)<br />

DIVISION: CUSTOMER CARE<br />

Purpose: To render customer care services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Provide customer care services.<br />

2.Render call centre services.<br />

3.Attend to customer equiries<br />

1x Manager (new)<br />

1x Senior Customer Care Officer<br />

1x Call Centre Officer<br />

1x Call Centre Clerk<br />

12x Call Centre Operator (9new)<br />

2x Receptionist


563<br />

DEPARTMENT: CORPORATE SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To manage corporate services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Manage human resource administration.<br />

2. Manage organisational development.<br />

3. Manage labour relations.<br />

4. Manage auxillary services.<br />

5. Manage informantion and communication technology<br />

6. Manage human resources development.<br />

7. manage employee wellness services.<br />

8. Manage legal services.<br />

1x Director<br />

1x Secretary<br />

DIVISION: HUMAN RESOURCES<br />

ADMINISTRATION<br />

Purpose: To render human resources<br />

management services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Render human resources administration and<br />

benefits.<br />

2. Facilitate recruitment and selection.<br />

3. Coordinate policy development.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Senior HR Officer<br />

4x HR Officer<br />

2x HR Clerk<br />

DIVISION:ORGANISATIONAL<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

Purpose: To manage organisational<br />

development.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Process Improvement.<br />

2. Render organisational development services.<br />

3. Facilitate the development of job descriptions.<br />

4. Conduct job evaluation.<br />

1x Manager<br />

3x Organisational Development Officer (1new)<br />

DIVISION : LABOUR RELATIONS<br />

Purpose : To manage labour relations services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1.Handle misconduct cases.<br />

2. facilitate disciplinary procedures.<br />

1x Manager<br />

3x Labour Relations Officer (1new)<br />

DIVISION:AUXILIARY SERVICES<br />

Purpose:To manage auxiliary services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Render records management<br />

2. Manage fleet & facilities.<br />

1x Manager<br />

DIVISION: INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

Purpose: To manage information and<br />

communication technology.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Provide information and communication technology.<br />

2. Monitor the performance of ICT infrastructure.<br />

3. Monitor network performance.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Senior System Administrator<br />

1x Senior Network Controller<br />

4x IT Technician (1new)<br />

DIVISION: HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT<br />

Purpose: To facilitate competency development of<br />

employees.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Compilation and implementation of WPSDP.<br />

2. Coordinate training activities.<br />

3. Render human resources development.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Senior Training Officer<br />

3x Training Officer (1new)<br />

DIVISION: EMPLOYEE WELLNESS<br />

Purpose: To render employee wellness servicess.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Facilitate EAP Programmes.<br />

2. Effective and efficient management of workplace<br />

hazards.<br />

1x Manager<br />

2x EAP Officer (1new)<br />

1x OHS Officer<br />

2x OHS Clerk (1new)<br />

DIVISION : LEGAL SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To manage legal services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Provide legal advice to council and administration.<br />

2. Maintain and update legal resources.<br />

3. Provide executive support.<br />

1x Manager<br />

2x Legal Admin Officer


564<br />

DIVISION:AUXILIARY SERVICES<br />

Purpose:To manage auxiliary services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Render records management<br />

2. Manage fleet & facilities.<br />

1x Manager<br />

SECTION: RECORDS MANAGEMENT<br />

Purpose: To render records management<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Render photocopy services.<br />

2. Provide registry and archives services.<br />

1x Senior Records Admin Officer<br />

1x Records Officer<br />

4x Registry Clerk<br />

2x Photocopy Operator<br />

3x Messenger<br />

SECTION: FLEET MANAGEMENT<br />

Purpose: To co-ordinate, monitor and<br />

undertakes specific sequences/activities<br />

associated with fleet management.<br />

Functions:<br />

1.Ensure fleet maintanance of the<br />

municipality.<br />

2. Coordinate fleet control.<br />

1x Senior Fleet Officer<br />

1x Fleet Officer (new)<br />

3x Fleet Clerk<br />

SECTION: FACILITIES MANAGEMENT<br />

Purpose: To co-ordinate, monitor and<br />

undertakes specific sequences/activities<br />

associated with facilities management.<br />

Functions:<br />

1.Plan, organize, direct, and review the<br />

operations and activities of the facilities<br />

management.<br />

1x Senior Facilities Officer (new)<br />

1x Facilities Officer<br />

2x Facilities Clerk (new)<br />

1x Handyman<br />

2x General Worker (new)


565<br />

DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To provide community services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Manage emergency services.<br />

2. Manage municipal health services.<br />

3. Manage disaster fuctions.<br />

4. Promote sports, arts and culture.<br />

1x Director<br />

1x Secretary<br />

DIVISION: EMERGENCY SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To manage emergency services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Render emergency services.<br />

2.Manage training academy.<br />

3. Facilitate fire safety services.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk<br />

DIVISION: MUNICIPAL HEALTH SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To manage municipal health and<br />

social services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1.Conduct awareness campaigns on municipal<br />

health programmes.<br />

2.Develop and implement the environmental management<br />

programmes.<br />

3.Monitor compliance on environmental health services.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x HIV/Aids Coordinator<br />

DIVISION: DISASTER MANAGEMENT<br />

Purpose: To manage all disaster functions.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Perform activities leading to risk reduction, recovery,<br />

rehabilitation, relief and response.<br />

1x Manager<br />

5x Disaster Officer (2new)<br />

DIVISION: SPORTS, ARTS AND CULTURE<br />

Purpose: To promote sports ,arts and culture<br />

services<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordinate sports, arts and culture programmes<br />

2. Promote arts & culture programmes<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Arts & Culture Officer<br />

1x Sports Officer


566<br />

DIVISION: EMERGENCY SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To manage emergency services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Render emergency services.<br />

2.Manage training academy.<br />

3. Facilitate fire safety services.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk<br />

TRAINING ACADEMY<br />

Purpose: To develop competent safe and effective fire<br />

service personnel.<br />

Functions:<br />

1.Develop and provide emergency services training<br />

programmes.<br />

1 x Principal (new)<br />

2x Training Officer<br />

FIRE SAFETY<br />

Purpose:To ensure a safe environment.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Reduce risk and ensure compliance.<br />

1x Chief Fire Inspector (new)<br />

5x Fire Inspector (new)<br />

EMERGENCY SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To provide an effective fire and rescue<br />

services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Enforsement of municipal emergency<br />

management services by-laws.<br />

2. Ensure the delivery of effective and effecient<br />

emergency services.<br />

1 x Chief Fire Officer<br />

GROBLERSDAL FIRE STATION<br />

Purpose: To provide an effective fire and<br />

rescue services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Enforsement of municipal emergency<br />

management services by-laws.<br />

2. Ensure the delivery of effective and<br />

effecient emergency services.<br />

1x Divisional Fire Officer<br />

4x Station Officer<br />

8x Leading Fire Fighter (4new)<br />

8x Senior Fire Fighter (4new)<br />

8x Fire Fighter (4new)<br />

8x Junior Fire Fighter<br />

MAKHUDUTHAMAGA FIRE STATION<br />

Purpose: To provide an effective fire and<br />

rescue services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Enforsement of municipal emergency<br />

management services by-laws.<br />

2. Ensure the delivery of effective and<br />

effecient emergency services.<br />

1x Divisional Fire Officer<br />

4x Station Officer<br />

8x Leading Fire Fighter (4new)<br />

8x Senior Fire Fighter (4new)<br />

8x Fire Fighter (4new)<br />

8x Junior Fire Fighter<br />

TUBATSE FIRE STATION<br />

Purpose: To provide an effective fire and<br />

rescue services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Enforsement of municipal emergency<br />

management services by-laws.<br />

2. Ensure the delivery of effective and<br />

effecient emergency services.<br />

1x Divisional Fire Officer<br />

4x Station Officer<br />

8x Leading Fire Fighter (4new)<br />

8x Senior Fire Fighter (4new)<br />

8x Fire Fighter (4new)<br />

8x Junior Fire Fighter


567<br />

DIVISION: MUNICIPAL HEALTH SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To manage municipal health and<br />

social services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1.Conduct awareness campaigns on municipal<br />

health programmes.<br />

2.Develop and implement the environmental management<br />

programmes.<br />

3.Monitor compliance on environmental health services.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x HIV/Aids Coordinator<br />

MAKHUDUTHAMAGA REGION<br />

Purpose: To render Municipal Health Services.<br />

FETAKGOMO REGION<br />

Purpose: To render Municipal Health Services.<br />

EPHRAIM MOGALE REGION<br />

Purpose: To render Municipal Health Services.<br />

ELIAS MOTSOALEDI REGION<br />

Purpose: To render Municipal Health Services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement MHS functional areas.i.e food<br />

control, waste management, health surveillance<br />

of premises.<br />

1 x Chief Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

1 x Senior Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

2 x Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement MHS functional areas.i.e food<br />

control, waste management, health surveillance<br />

of premises.<br />

1 x Chief Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

1 x Senior Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

2 x Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement MHS functional areas.i.e food<br />

control, waste management, health surveillance<br />

of premises.<br />

1 x Chief Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

1 x Senior Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

2 x Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

Fuctions:<br />

1. Implement MHS functional areas.i.e food<br />

control, waste management, health surveillance<br />

of premises.<br />

1 x Chief Enviromental Health Practitioner<br />

1 x Senior Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

4 x Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

TUBATSE REGION<br />

Purpose: To render Municipal Health Services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement MHS functional areas.i.e food<br />

control, waste management, health surveillance<br />

of premises.<br />

1 x Chief Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

1 x Senior Environmental Health Practitioner<br />

4 x Environmental Health Practitioner


568<br />

DEPARTMENT: INFRASTRUCTURE & WATER SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To develop, operate and maintain water services<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Strategic management of water services.<br />

2. Coordinate & facilitate transport services.<br />

3. Coordinate energy services.<br />

1x Director<br />

1x Secretary<br />

SUB-DEPARTMENT: WATER SERVICES AUTHORITY<br />

Purpose: To manage water services infrastructure develpment<br />

and monitor the provision of water services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Strategic planning.<br />

2. Implementation of projects.<br />

3. Regulatory and governance.<br />

4. Water conservation & water demand management planning.<br />

1x Deputy Director (new)<br />

1x Secretary (new)<br />

SUB-DEPARTMENT: WATER SERVICES PROVIDER<br />

Purpose: To provide water services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Manage bulk water services infrastructure.<br />

2. Manage water reticulation and sanitation services.<br />

3. Manage scientific services.<br />

1x Deputy Director<br />

1x Secretary (new)


569<br />

SUB-DEPARTMENT: WATER SERVICES AUTHORITY<br />

Purpose: To manage water services infrastructure<br />

develpment and monitor the provision of water services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Strategic planning.<br />

2. Implementation of projects.<br />

3. Regulatory and governance.<br />

4. Water conservation & water demand management<br />

planning.<br />

1x Deputy Director (new)<br />

1x Secretary (new)<br />

DIVISION: PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT<br />

Purpose: To manage the implementation of<br />

capital projects.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Financial management.<br />

2. Implementation of projects.<br />

3. Contract administration.<br />

4. Programme / Project management.<br />

5. Community Liaison / Development.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Senior Project Manager (new)<br />

1x Project Accountant<br />

10x Project Officer/ Technicians<br />

3x ISD Officer<br />

1x Data Capturer (new)<br />

DIVISION: REGULATION & GOVERNANCE UNIT<br />

Purpose: To monitor and evaluate the provision<br />

and compliance of water services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Monitoring the performance of the WSPs.<br />

2. Providing tools and mechanisms for reporting.<br />

3. Development and enforcement of by-laws and<br />

policies.<br />

4. Setting Tariffs.<br />

5. Development of service standards and client<br />

services charter.<br />

1x Manager (new)<br />

2x Monitoring & Evaluation Officer (new)<br />

DIVISION: STRATEGIC PLANNING UNIT<br />

Purpose: To ensure adequate planning of water<br />

services developments.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Drafting of strategic water services plans.<br />

2. Approval of development plans.<br />

1x Planning Engineer<br />

3x Technicians (2new)


570<br />

SUB-DEPARTMENT: WATER SERVICES PROVIDER<br />

Purpose: To provide water services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Manage bulk water services infrastructure.<br />

2. Manage water reticulation and sanitation services.<br />

3. Manage scientific services.<br />

1x Deputy Director<br />

1x Secretary (new)<br />

DIVISION: BULK OPERATIONS<br />

Purpose: To manage the operation of bulk water<br />

services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Manage water resources and water treatment<br />

works<br />

2. Manage waste water treatment works<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Water Treatment Works Officer: WTP (new)<br />

1x Waste Water Treatment Works Officer:<br />

WWTP (new)<br />

2x Plant Supt: WTP & WWTP (new)<br />

2x Senior Plant Operator: WTP & WWTP (new)<br />

2x Plant Operator: WTP & WWTP (new)<br />

DIVISION: RETICULATION & SANITATION<br />

SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To provide water services directly to<br />

the consumer.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Operate and maintain water distribution<br />

systems.<br />

2.Customer care services.<br />

3. Implement water conservation & water<br />

demand management<br />

4. Operate and maintain boreholes .<br />

1x Manager<br />

5x ISD Officer<br />

1 x Water Conservation & Water Demand Officer<br />

3x Artisan plumber (new)<br />

6x General workers (3new)<br />

DIVISION: SCIENTIFIC SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To ensure adherance to water quality<br />

regulations.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Developing and implementing water quality<br />

management systems.<br />

1x Manager<br />

5x Water Quality Officer<br />

1x Lab Technician (new)<br />

1x Lab Assistant (new)


571<br />

DIVISION: RETICULATION & SANITATION<br />

SERVICES<br />

Purpose: To provide water services directly to<br />

the consumer.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Operate and maintain water distribution<br />

systems.<br />

2.Customer care services.<br />

3. Implement water conservation & water<br />

demand management<br />

4. Operate and maintain boreholes .<br />

1x Manager<br />

5x ISD Officer<br />

1 x Water Conservation & Water Demand Officer<br />

3x Artisan plumber (new)<br />

6x General workers (3new)<br />

FETAKGOMO REGION<br />

Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />

and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />

and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />

ELIAS MOTSWALEDI REGION<br />

Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />

and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />

and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />

EPHRAIM MOGALE REGION<br />

Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />

and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />

and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />

MAKHUDUTHAMAGA REGION<br />

Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />

and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />

and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordination of the depot.<br />

2. Management of tankering service.<br />

3. Reporting on performance of the region..<br />

1x Regional Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />

3x Driver<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordination of the depot.<br />

2. Management of tankering service.<br />

3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />

1x Regional Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />

5x Driver<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordination of the depot.<br />

2. Management of tankering service.<br />

3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />

1x Regional Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk(new)<br />

4x Driver<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordination of the depot.<br />

2. Management of tankering service.<br />

3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />

1x Regional Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />

5x Driver<br />

TUBATSE REGION<br />

Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />

and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />

and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />

SECTION: ELECTRO MECHANICAL<br />

Purpose: To render operations and maintenance<br />

services of boreholes, boosters supply pumps.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordination of the depot.<br />

2. Management of tankering service.<br />

3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />

1x Regional Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />

6x Driver (5new)<br />

Functions:<br />

1.Ensure that all electrical and mechanical<br />

pumps are in operation.<br />

2.Render welding services.<br />

1x Electro - Mechanical Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk (new)


572<br />

FETAKGOMO REGION<br />

Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />

and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />

and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordination of the depot.<br />

2. Management of tankering service.<br />

3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />

1x Regional Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />

3x Driver<br />

APEL DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

19x Pump Operator (new)<br />

8x General Worker<br />

BB KLOOF DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meter.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

<strong>23</strong>x Pump Operator (new)<br />

8x General Worker


573<br />

ELIAS MOTSWALEDI REGION<br />

Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />

and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />

and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordination of the depot.<br />

2. Management of tankering service.<br />

3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />

1x Regional Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />

5x Driver<br />

MOTETEMA/GROBLERSDAL<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

UITSPANNING DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

HLOGOTLOU DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

TAFELKOP/ROSSENEKAL<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

8x General Worker<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

17x Pump Operator (new)<br />

8x General Worker<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

10x Pump Operator (2new)<br />

8x General Worker<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

8x Pump Operator<br />

8x General Worker


574<br />

EPHRAIM MOGALE REGION<br />

Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />

and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />

and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordination of the depot.<br />

2. Management of tankering service.<br />

3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />

1x Regional Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk(new)<br />

4x Driver<br />

ELANDSRAAL DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

MOGANYAKA DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

MOUTSE WEST (ZAMEKOMSTE)<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

MARBLE-HALL<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

2x Pump Operator (new)<br />

8x General Worker<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

1x Pump Operator<br />

8x General Worker<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

4x Pump Operator (new)<br />

8x General Worker<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

8x General Worker


575<br />

MAKHUDUTHAMAGA REGION<br />

Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />

and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />

and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordination of the depot.<br />

2. Management of tankering service.<br />

3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />

1x Regional Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />

5x Driver<br />

MASEMOLA CENTRAL DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

8x Pump Operator<br />

8x General Worker)<br />

NEBO CENTRAL DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

15x Pump Operator (7new)<br />

8x General Worker)<br />

SCHOONORD DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

18x Pump Operator (10new)<br />

8x General Worker


576<br />

TUBATSE REGION<br />

Purpose: To ensure adequate operation of water<br />

and sanitation - distribution, reticulation, storage<br />

and on site sanitation systems in the region.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Coordination of the depot.<br />

2. Management of tankering service.<br />

3. Reporting on performance of the region.<br />

1x Regional Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />

6x Driver (5new)<br />

PENGE/PRACTISEEE DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

MOROKE DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

LEBOENG DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

MAPODILE DEPOT<br />

Purpose :To operate and maintain sewer and<br />

water reticulation & storage systems.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

15x Pump Operator (4new)<br />

8x General Worker<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

47x Pump Operator (new)<br />

8x General Worker<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

<strong>23</strong>x Pump Operator (new)<br />

8x General Worker<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of water reticulation, water<br />

distribution & water storage works.<br />

2. Implement planned/unplanned repairs &<br />

maintanance of sewer networks, outfall lines and<br />

on site sanitation systems.<br />

3. Installation of new water meters.<br />

1x Depot Manager<br />

2x Artisan Plumber<br />

1x Foreman<br />

15x Pump Operator (9new)<br />

8x General Worker


577<br />

SECTION: ELECTRO MECHANICAL<br />

Purpose: To render operations and maintenance<br />

services of boreholes, boosters supply pumps.<br />

Functions:<br />

1.Ensure that all electrical and mechanical pumps are<br />

in operation.<br />

2.Render welding services.<br />

1x Electro - Mechanical Manager<br />

1x Admin Clerk (new)<br />

SECTION: WORKSHOP (Electrical)<br />

Purpose: To render electrical services.<br />

Functions<br />

1. Maintence of water and sewer infrastructure.<br />

1x Workshop Manager<br />

5x Artisan<br />

5x Artisan AId<br />

SECTION: WORKSHOP (Mechanical)<br />

Purpose: To render mechanical services.<br />

Functions<br />

1.Manitenance of water and sewer infrastructure.<br />

1x Workshop Manager<br />

5x Artisan<br />

5x Artisan AId<br />

SECTION: WORKSHOP (Welding)<br />

Purpose: To render welding services.<br />

Functions:<br />

1.Maintenence of water and sewer infrastructure.<br />

1x Workshop Manager<br />

5x Artisan<br />

5x Artisan AId


578<br />

DEPARTMENT:PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />

Purpose: To ensure integrated planning,sustainable spatial<br />

development and stimulation of economic<br />

development.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Manage spatial development planning.<br />

2. Coordinate and facilitate local economic development.<br />

3. Monitor performance and ensure implementation.<br />

4. Coordinate strategic planning.<br />

1x Director<br />

1x Secretary<br />

DIVISION: SPATIAL PLANNING<br />

Purpose : To manage spatial development planning.<br />

Functions :<br />

1. Incorporate environmental management<br />

practices in planning.<br />

2. Ensure coherent spatial development<br />

planning.<br />

3. Pursue sustainable land use management<br />

practices.<br />

4. Manage spatial information.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x GIS Specialist<br />

2x Town Planner<br />

1x GIS Technician<br />

DIVISION: LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT<br />

Purpose : To cordinate and facilitate local economic<br />

development.<br />

Functions<br />

1.Develop small medium and micro enterprises.<br />

2.Facilitate agriculture development .<br />

3.Promote tourism development.<br />

4.Facilitate mining related activities and<br />

investment attraction and retention.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x LED Officer(Enterprise Development)<br />

1x LED Officer(Agriculture)<br />

1x LED Officer (Tourism) (new)<br />

DIVISION: <strong>IDP</strong> & PMS<br />

Purpose: To facilitate PMS functions.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Cascading PMS to all levels except section 56<br />

employees.<br />

2.Consolidate monthly, quartely, mid year and annual<br />

report.<br />

3.Prepare process plan for & review of <strong>IDP</strong>.<br />

4.Compile <strong>IDP</strong> documents.<br />

5.Facilitate community participation process.<br />

6.Liase with secgor departments for alignment<br />

purposes.<br />

1x Manag er(new)<br />

1x Senior PMS Officer<br />

1x Senior <strong>IDP</strong> Officer<br />

2x PMS Officer<br />

2x <strong>IDP</strong> Officer (1new)


579<br />

DEPARTMENT: BUDGET & TREASURY<br />

Purpose: To provide financial management services<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Manage revenue and expenditure.<br />

2. Manage budget and reporting.<br />

3. Provide supply chain management services.<br />

4. Manage municipal assets.<br />

1x CFO<br />

1x Deputy CFO<br />

1x Secretary<br />

DIVISION: REVENUE<br />

Purpose: To manage revenue.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Collection of revenue (meter reading,<br />

billing, data & receipt management incl.<br />

customer care).<br />

2. Debt & credit control management.<br />

3. Indigent registration & management .<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Accountant<br />

1x Billing Officer<br />

1x Credit Control Officer<br />

2x Billing Clerk (1new)<br />

3x Credit Control Clerk (2new)<br />

1x Indigent Clerk (new)<br />

2x Data Capturer (new)<br />

1x Chief Meter Reader (new)<br />

20x Meter Reader (new)<br />

3x Cashier (1new)<br />

DIVISION: EXPENDITURE<br />

Purpose: To manage expenditure.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Manage creditors accounts.<br />

2. Manage payroll.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Accountant<br />

1x Chief Payroll Officer<br />

2x Senior Expenditure Clerk<br />

3x Expenditure Clerk<br />

2x Data Capture<br />

3x Payroll Clerk<br />

DIVISION: BUDGET & REPORTING<br />

Purpose: To manage budget and reporting.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Manage budget planning process.<br />

2. Monitor budget implementation.<br />

3. Reporting and preparation of annual financial<br />

statements.<br />

4. Cash management.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Accountant: Budget<br />

1x Accountant: AFS and Reporting (new)<br />

2x Budget Clerks<br />

1x Accounting Clerk (new)<br />

DIVISION: SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT<br />

Purpose: To provide supply chain management<br />

services<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Manage demand & acquisition<br />

1 x Manager<br />

1x Senior Procurement Officer: Demand &<br />

Performance Management (new)<br />

1x Senior Procurement Ofiicer (Acquisition)<br />

2x Procurement Officer(Acquisition)<br />

1x Procurement Officer (Demand & Performance<br />

Management)<br />

1x Senior Procurement Clerk<br />

5x Procurement Clerk<br />

DIVISION: ASSET MANAGEMENT<br />

Purpose: To manage municipal assets.<br />

Functions:<br />

1. Safeguarding of assets.<br />

2. Maintenance of the asset register, stores<br />

and logistics management.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Accountant<br />

1x Project Accountant (new)<br />

2x Asset Officer (1new)<br />

1x Stores Officers<br />

5x Stores Clerk: Depots (new)<br />

5x Assets Clerk<br />

DIVISION: CONTRACT MANAGEMENT<br />

Purpose: To ensure that contracts &<br />

agreements procured through supply chain<br />

management of the municipality are properly<br />

enforced.<br />

Functions:<br />

1.contract drafting<br />

2.Contract classification and management.<br />

1x Manager<br />

1x Contract Management Officer<br />

1x Admin Clerk


580

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!