24.11.2014 Views

in this issue

in this issue

in this issue

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

equipment<br />

report<br />

any nasty vibrations. There’s also a little<br />

hole cut <strong>in</strong>to the CD tray for your thumb,<br />

so that you can easily seat and unseat discs.<br />

And speak<strong>in</strong>g of the CD tray—it’s a special<br />

sled that’s been designed with an<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal clamp<strong>in</strong>g system that essentially<br />

holds the disc <strong>in</strong> a vise. No stupid pucks<br />

placed on top of the CD that can wiggle<br />

and bounce around <strong>in</strong>side—these guys at<br />

TEAC are dead serious about excavat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the last drop of performance. To its credit,<br />

TEAC has clearly put a lot of thought,<br />

effort, and TLC <strong>in</strong>to <strong>this</strong> baby.<br />

While some audiophiles get hung up<br />

on the nuances of SACD versus CD. I don’t<br />

and neither does the Esoteric, which plays<br />

them both beautifully. In fact, the Esoteric<br />

never balked at play<strong>in</strong>g any disc—burned,<br />

scorched, seared, or otherwise. The<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>e is mechanically as unflappable as<br />

it sounds. It never loses its serenity. Far too<br />

many players suffer transport breakdowns<br />

or balk, for often <strong>in</strong>scrutable reasons, at<br />

play<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> discs.<br />

No doubt the Esoteric’s virtues come<br />

at a stiff tariff. At $7700 the Esoteric is<br />

not <strong>in</strong>expensive, but to acquire <strong>this</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d<br />

of sound five years ago would have<br />

required the fortune of a Croesus. It’s<br />

important to say upfront, however, that<br />

<strong>this</strong> is not a player for the headbang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

crowd. It doesn’t draw attention to itself<br />

and lacks the slam that rock aficionados<br />

not only crave, but also deserve. Rather,<br />

the Esoteric seduces you with its wonderful<br />

palette of tonal colors, bloom, and<br />

capacious soundstage.<br />

The first and most immediate<br />

impression that the Esoteric makes is<br />

how fully it reproduces the musical l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

In visual terms, to me it’s the difference<br />

between a balloon that’s sagg<strong>in</strong>g or burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with air. On one of my favorite<br />

record<strong>in</strong>gs of the Handel Trio Sonatas<br />

[Convivium Ensemble, Hyperion], the<br />

mellowness of the oboe and the amount<br />

of tube-like air surround<strong>in</strong>g it were<br />

enchant<strong>in</strong>g. I can’t get that beautifully<br />

woody oboe out of my head. Overall, the<br />

sound was full and warm with each<br />

<strong>in</strong>strument carefully reproduced <strong>in</strong> its<br />

own space. Hear<strong>in</strong>g all four <strong>in</strong>struments<br />

like <strong>this</strong>, particularly the cello with its<br />

rich resonance, bumbl<strong>in</strong>g along together,<br />

each easily dist<strong>in</strong>guished, each limpidly<br />

communicat<strong>in</strong>g with the other to create a<br />

coherent musical message, is always a<br />

thrill for me. Isn’t that what <strong>this</strong> hobby<br />

is, or is supposed to be, about?<br />

The truth is that the Esoteric is so<br />

mellifluous that it simply floats out the<br />

music, tugg<strong>in</strong>g at your heartstr<strong>in</strong>gs rather<br />

than bellow<strong>in</strong>g, “Listen to me!” On “I<br />

Deserve It” [Warner], Madonna’s voice<br />

simply sounded immaculate—relaxed,<br />

luscious, and heart-rend<strong>in</strong>g—while the<br />

accompaniment, especially the drums,<br />

was perfectly <strong>in</strong> place, with nary a trace of<br />

harshness. It’s the k<strong>in</strong>d of sound, I’m conv<strong>in</strong>ced,<br />

that would <strong>in</strong>stantly make any<br />

non-audiophile, if not capitulate to the<br />

siren song of high-end audio, at least<br />

understand why a table radio may not<br />

always be the right answer. A friend of<br />

m<strong>in</strong>e who is an experienced listener discerned<br />

the Esoteric’s gentle qualities with<strong>in</strong><br />

seconds, and it was certa<strong>in</strong>ly fun to<br />

watch his eyes bulge at the ref<strong>in</strong>ed sound.<br />

Don’t get me wrong. The Esoteric<br />

does not smudge or blur transients. Quite<br />

the contrary. The Esoteric l<strong>in</strong>gers over<br />

notes, giv<strong>in</strong>g them their full value. Its<br />

sound is not effervescent, but stately with<br />

extremely measured and regular pac<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

This makes for a conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>gly whole<br />

presentation, unruffled and unhurried,<br />

where the notes simply unfold <strong>in</strong>stead of<br />

collid<strong>in</strong>g with each other.<br />

Indeed, what makes the Esoteric so<br />

enjoyable is the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of articulateness<br />

and bloom. The th<strong>in</strong>gs that<br />

audiophiles crave—the reproduction of<br />

quavers, vibratos, and shad<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> a<br />

phrase—are what make the rise and fall of<br />

a passage more than just a rote recapitulation<br />

of a series of pitches. The ability to<br />

deliver these qualities is what dist<strong>in</strong>guishes<br />

what the Germans like to call the<br />

Liebhaber, or amateur, from the Kenner, or<br />

expert, musician. The Esoteric, you<br />

might say, is a Kenner.<br />

After weeks and weeks of listen<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

the Esoteric, I returned to my regular<br />

Meitner digital gear. It re<strong>in</strong>forced the<br />

virtues of listen<strong>in</strong>g to different gear for me.<br />

The Meitner threw the Esoteric’s qualities<br />

<strong>in</strong>to even starker relief. The Meitner was<br />

more detailed, complex, and transparent,<br />

reveal<strong>in</strong>g more l<strong>in</strong>es of music. In addition,<br />

it was more energetic, particularly <strong>in</strong> the<br />

bass and treble. The Esoteric’s octave-tooctave<br />

balance is irreproachable, but it<br />

sounds slightly shrunken next to the<br />

Meitner. It’s simply not quite as big. It<br />

seems to me that the Esoteric is a piece<br />

that you love, excus<strong>in</strong>g any deficiencies,<br />

however m<strong>in</strong>or, because you love it, whereas<br />

the Meitner is the K<strong>in</strong>g Kong of digital.<br />

It simply commands awesome respect for<br />

its power and sweep. Ultimately, however,<br />

the similarities rather than the differences<br />

between the players are what stood out. I<br />

could easily live with either with no<br />

regrets. Of course, audiophiles like to place<br />

enormous importance on small dist<strong>in</strong>ctions,<br />

which is their right. F<strong>in</strong>e. One person’s<br />

dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g returns is another’s m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

requirement. But both the Esoteric<br />

and the Meitner offer stratospheric performance,<br />

an embarrassment of riches, by<br />

any standards.<br />

Top-notch digital playback is becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />

scary stuff and breath<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>this</strong> rarefied<br />

air can be a dizzy<strong>in</strong>g, even <strong>in</strong>toxicat<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

experience. The Esoteric draws<br />

you <strong>in</strong>to the sound to such an extent that<br />

you tend to forget about the nuts and<br />

bolts of the player and simply wallow <strong>in</strong><br />

the music. If you haven’t guessed by now,<br />

I did a not <strong>in</strong>substantial amount of wallow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Yup, I liked it. A lot. And so, I<br />

bet, will you. If you’re <strong>in</strong> the market for a<br />

top-notch player and your budget permits<br />

the likes of the sumptuous Esoteric,<br />

I suspect that, after listen<strong>in</strong>g to it, you<br />

may decide not to waste much time look<strong>in</strong>g<br />

elsewhere.<br />

&<br />

SPECIFICATIONS<br />

Transport outputs: One optical, one coaxial,<br />

one i.LINK term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

Analog outputs: Balanced (XLR) and<br />

unbalanced (RCA)<br />

Dimensions: 17.5" x 6" x 13.75"<br />

Weight: 51 lbs.<br />

MANUFACTURER INFORMATION<br />

TEAC AMERICA, INC.<br />

7733 Telegraph Road<br />

Montebello, California 90460<br />

(323) 726-0303<br />

teac.com<br />

Price: $7700<br />

108 THE ABSOLUTE SOUND ■ APRIL/MAY 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!