24.11.2014 Views

Depth of Field.pdf - The DV Show

Depth of Field.pdf - The DV Show

Depth of Field.pdf - The DV Show

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

0308ccu10 <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong> field 22/5/03 3:18 pm Page 22<br />

FIELD OF<br />

DREAMS<br />

Jim Tyler explains the age-old<br />

conundrum <strong>of</strong> <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Field</strong>.<br />

Learn to use it and add a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional touch to your videos<br />

Everybody thinks they know<br />

roughly what <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Field</strong><br />

(DoF) is, but only a few people<br />

really understand what its implications<br />

are – and believe me, there are<br />

plenty <strong>of</strong> common misconceptions on<br />

the subject.<br />

A lens is only precisely focused at one<br />

point, and the further away from that<br />

single point a subject is, the less sharp<br />

its focus. <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Field</strong> is the distance<br />

between the closest and most distant<br />

points from the lens at which the subject<br />

is in reasonably sharp focus.<br />

This means that when you shoot a<br />

panorama with a person standing in<br />

the near foreground, either the person<br />

or the background can be in focus –<br />

but not both. <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Field</strong> can be<br />

increased by using a smaller aperture<br />

or by moving further away from the<br />

subject, provided the focal length is<br />

constant – that is, you don’t zoom in.<br />

I’ve just read an article about <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Field</strong> on a camcorder internet site, and it<br />

included the fact that DoF decreases<br />

with lens to subject distance (which is<br />

correct) but suggested that, in order to<br />

get the same image with greater DoF,<br />

you simply moved further away from<br />

the subject and zoomed in to achieve<br />

the same frame – which is balderdash!<br />

If you shoot a subject that’s just a<br />

yard away then the DoF will be very<br />

small, maybe between 2ft 9in and 3ft<br />

9in, depending on the aperture. Move<br />

back another twenty yards and shoot at<br />

20x magnification, so that the subject<br />

occupies the same amount <strong>of</strong> screen,<br />

and the DoF will be exactly the same –<br />

3in either side <strong>of</strong> the point at which<br />

the lens is focused to give a total DoF<br />

<strong>of</strong> 6in. What will change as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

moving further away and zooming in<br />

is the perspective, making your subject<br />

matter appear ‘flatter’.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is, in fact, only one way <strong>of</strong><br />

altering the DoF for a given subject<br />

occupying a given area <strong>of</strong> the screen,<br />

and that is to vary the lens aperture.<br />

<strong>The</strong> smaller the aperture, the greater the<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> field. If you vary the aperture<br />

the time that the CCD is exposed must<br />

also vary, so that the correct amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> light reaches it. To get the correct<br />

exposure with a smaller aperture it’s<br />

necessary to lengthen the exposure,<br />

and vice-versa. Unfortunately, unlike<br />

stills photographers, who record only<br />

an instant in time and not time itself,<br />

we are stuck with 1/25th <strong>of</strong> a second<br />

exposure and can’t vary exposure time<br />

without suffering side effects.<br />

To decrease depth <strong>of</strong> field, which we<br />

do in order to throw undesired elements<br />

<strong>of</strong> a scene completely out <strong>of</strong> focus, we


0308ccu10 <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong> field 22/5/03 3:19 pm Page 23<br />

<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Field</strong> <strong>The</strong> Knowledge<br />

need a wider aperture. This involves<br />

reducing the exposure time in order to<br />

keep the same amount <strong>of</strong> light being<br />

processed by the CCD. <strong>The</strong> problem<br />

with reducing the exposure time is that<br />

we record only segments <strong>of</strong> time and,<br />

if the exposure is very short, this gives<br />

jerky onscreen movement.<br />

Decreasing the exposure time to<br />

1/50th <strong>of</strong> a second won’t make your<br />

video look like cine film, but the effect<br />

on DoF won’t be much to write home<br />

about either – just one stop. At 1/100th<br />

<strong>of</strong> a second the effect on motion begins<br />

to be apparent, and still you will have<br />

opened the iris only a couple <strong>of</strong> stops.<br />

Whether such small changes in aperture<br />

will be sufficient depends on what<br />

you’re shooting and, perhaps more<br />

specifically, how far away from the<br />

lens the point <strong>of</strong> focus is.<br />

Increasing the exposure time beyond<br />

1/25th <strong>of</strong> a second to achieve a smaller<br />

aperture and so extend the depth <strong>of</strong><br />

field (not all camcorders allow this)<br />

obviously means shooting at less than<br />

25 frames per second, meaning that<br />

onscreen movement is really jerky.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a better way!<br />

Lighting-up time!<br />

If you shoot a very bright scene the<br />

auto exposure will give you all the DoF<br />

your heart could desire by selecting a<br />

small aperture for you, and vice versa.<br />

If you shoot using artificial lighting you<br />

can vary its intensity at will, but most<br />

video is shot using natural daylight, over<br />

which we have no control other than to<br />

try to select the right day, and time <strong>of</strong><br />

day, to shoot!<br />

Put simply, if you want, for instance,<br />

to shoot a panorama and get as much<br />

as possible <strong>of</strong> it in passably sharp focus,<br />

do it on a day with a cloudless sky,<br />

sometime between mid-morning and<br />

mid-afternoon. If you want to get just<br />

one specific element <strong>of</strong> the scene in<br />

focus and lose the rest then shoot on<br />

a dull day.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the time, we want to get as<br />

much <strong>of</strong> the scene as we can in focus,<br />

Far Left: <strong>The</strong> rose is<br />

about a yard from the<br />

camcorder, which is at<br />

a wide-angle setting.<br />

Note that both the<br />

near and distant<br />

foliage is out <strong>of</strong> focus<br />

– in fact, some is<br />

barely recognisable<br />

Left: Taken from three<br />

yards away at three<br />

times the magnification<br />

(so that the rose<br />

appears roughly the<br />

same size). <strong>The</strong> <strong>Depth</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Field</strong> is the same.<br />

Moving back from a<br />

subject and zooming<br />

in does not alter DoF –<br />

to do that you need to<br />

close down the iris!<br />

What has been altered<br />

is the perspective –<br />

the shot is from a<br />

different position<br />

Below: Here’s the<br />

same shot, taken with<br />

the iris stopped down.<br />

Compare this with the<br />

previous shot and<br />

you’ll see both nearer<br />

and more distant<br />

detail in better focus<br />

‘<strong>The</strong>re is, in fact, only<br />

one way <strong>of</strong> altering<br />

the DoF for a given<br />

subject occupying<br />

a given area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

screen, and that<br />

is to vary the<br />

lens aperture’<br />

23<br />

Camcorder User & <strong>DV</strong>D Movie Maker August 2003


0308ccu10 <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong> field 22/5/03 3:19 pm Page 24<br />

<strong>The</strong> Knowledge<br />

<strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Field</strong><br />

‘Sadly, not one<br />

current consumer<br />

camcorder that<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers manual focus<br />

has a distance scale<br />

engraved on the<br />

lens barrel’<br />

and you don’t necessarily have to be at<br />

the very smallest aperture to achieve<br />

enough DoF. A mid-range aperture <strong>of</strong><br />

ƒ8 to ƒ11 will give reasonable DoF<br />

and, perhaps more importantly, the<br />

resolving power <strong>of</strong> a lens peaks at<br />

these apertures.<br />

If you want to get the far distance<br />

in focus, different apertures effectively<br />

give different closest points <strong>of</strong> focus. At<br />

ƒ22 you might get everything from the<br />

horizon down to 6ft in front <strong>of</strong> the lens<br />

in focus when shooting without any<br />

zoom, at ƒ16 the point <strong>of</strong> close focus<br />

might extend to 8ft, at ƒ11 it might be<br />

11ft, at ƒ8 15ft and at ƒ4 nearer 30ft.<br />

Unfortunately you’ll find that <strong>Depth</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Field</strong> figures are not exact. This is<br />

because there is no hard and fast<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> what constitutes reasonable<br />

focus – it is subjective and will vary<br />

according the circumstance. It could be<br />

so sharp that you can see individual<br />

hairs on a subject’s head, or just sharp<br />

enough to recognise that the subject<br />

was a person! Another inexact figure is<br />

the Hyperfocal distance. This is the<br />

distance at which the lens should focus,<br />

in order for both a desired distant point<br />

<strong>of</strong> focus, and a desired close point <strong>of</strong><br />

focus (which is half the Hyperfocal<br />

distance), to be tolerably sharp.<br />

Focus <strong>of</strong>f the subject<br />

It might sound daft, but there are times<br />

when it can pay not to focus directly<br />

on the main subject. <strong>The</strong> Hyperfocal<br />

distance might be theoretical but the<br />

principle can be used in practice to<br />

achieve the shots you really want.<br />

Suppose that your main subject is<br />

20ft away and that you want both the<br />

subject and some more distant parts <strong>of</strong><br />

the scene to be in focus. If you allow<br />

the auto focus to settle on the main<br />

Left: In order to get mini <strong>DV</strong> picture<br />

quality with none <strong>of</strong> the colour bleed<br />

<strong>of</strong> analogue tape, and also keep control<br />

over focus and <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Field</strong>, Jim has<br />

taken the extraordinary step <strong>of</strong> coupling<br />

his JVC GR-S707 and Sony TRV20<br />

subject, the DoF might not extend far<br />

enough behind it to accommodate<br />

the background. However, if you force<br />

focus on 30ft, both the subject and the<br />

background should be in focus, given<br />

that the aperture is sufficiently small<br />

to grant that DoF.<br />

Sadly, not one current consumer cam<br />

that <strong>of</strong>fers manual focus has a distance<br />

scale engraved on the lens barrel. This<br />

has become a no-go feature for camcorder<br />

manufacturers in recent years,<br />

and while my old S-VHS model does<br />

feature it, you’ll look long and hard<br />

before you see it on any <strong>of</strong> today’s<br />

models. While manufacturers might not<br />

include a calibrated lens ring many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

higher end enthusiast models do at least<br />

give focusing and exposure details on the<br />

LCD screen and optical viewfinder.<br />

<strong>The</strong> GR-S707 also allows me to set<br />

aperture in terms <strong>of</strong> f-stops and so gives<br />

complete control over not only focus but<br />

also DoF. <strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> manual focus<br />

rings are now ‘fly by wire’ jobs that are<br />

pretty well useless, meaning that – even<br />

with camcorders that <strong>of</strong>fer manual focus<br />

– it is <strong>of</strong>ten better to manipulate the<br />

auto focus than to try to focus manually.<br />

So how do you ‘manipulate’ auto<br />

focus? Simply give it a ‘target’ at the<br />

desired distance. This means placing<br />

the main subject <strong>of</strong>f-centre and having<br />

something at the correct distance occupying<br />

centre screen. If your camcorder<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers focus lock, engage it and re-frame<br />

or, if your camcorder has manual focus,<br />

engage that and re-frame.<br />

24<br />

Camcorder User & <strong>DV</strong>D Movie Maker August 2003<br />

Close encounters<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is another way in which you can<br />

get a subject in sharp focus and get<br />

the background hopelessly out <strong>of</strong> focus<br />

– and that is to get very close to the<br />

subject. This is because <strong>Depth</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Field</strong><br />

is reduced as the point <strong>of</strong> focus gets<br />

closer to the lens. Unfortunately, in order<br />

to get really close you need to go wide<br />

angle, so that the DoF increases! ■

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!