26.11.2014 Views

GSN 2014 October/November Digital Edition

Government Security News

Government Security News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UPFRONT<br />

Ebola by Sea<br />

BY DENISE RUCKER KREPP<br />

Over the past several days,<br />

governors in New York, New Jersey,<br />

Illinois, and Connecticut issued<br />

quarantine guidance for individuals<br />

who’ve been in contact with African Ebola patients.<br />

The state guidance focuses on individuals who’ve<br />

returned to the U.S. via airplanes. At some point a<br />

mariner is going to arrive, sick with the dangerous<br />

disease. Unfortunately, the federal government has<br />

yet to address this possibility and state governors<br />

won’t be willing to wait for the bureaucratic federal<br />

machine to churn out vague policy guidance. They’re<br />

going to issue state guidance and this guidance could<br />

significantly impact U.S. port operations nationwide.<br />

The U.S. Coast Guard is the federal agency<br />

responsible for port operations and the Coast Guard<br />

Captain of the Port manages port operations on a dayby-day<br />

basis. This individual can prevent a foreign flag<br />

ship from entering a U.S. port. He or she can also require<br />

foreign flag vessels who have ported Sierra Leone,<br />

Guinea, and Liberia, Ebola stricken nations, to undergo<br />

additional scrutiny before they are allowed in U.S. waters.<br />

The agency released a marine safety information<br />

bulletin last week that everyone in the maritime industry<br />

should read. The bulletin recommends that “local<br />

industry stakeholders work with the Coast Guard Captain<br />

of the Port to review and be familiar with their Marine<br />

Transportation System Recovery Plan.” These plans were<br />

mandated after the 9/11 attacks and the agency issued<br />

guidance earlier this summer on how to draft them.<br />

As someone who doesn’t believe in re-inventing<br />

the wheel, I strongly support using existing guidance<br />

to address current crises. The problem in this situation<br />

is that the recovery plans don’t address Ebola-like<br />

catastrophes. These plans focus on terrorist attacks<br />

and natural hazards similar to Hurricanes Katrina and<br />

Sandy. They don’t address a ship manned with mariners<br />

decimated by Ebola.<br />

The Coast Guard appears to recognize the shortcomings<br />

of the current recovery plan by recommending<br />

in the <strong>October</strong> 22nd bulletin that the local stakeholders<br />

“consider conducting a<br />

table top exercise to plan<br />

and address items such<br />

as an evaluation of how<br />

to handle a vessel arrival<br />

with a suspected Ebola<br />

case... what steps need to<br />

be considered if a medical<br />

evacuation is needed, and<br />

possibly how a ship would<br />

be decontaminated in<br />

order to commence cargo<br />

transfers.” Good idea.<br />

A seaport is a finely-tuned machine. According to<br />

the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, in 2011, 7,662<br />

oceangoing vessels made 67, 929 calls at U.S. ports.<br />

Time is money for vessels owners – they want to enter<br />

a port, discharge their cargo, taken on new cargo, and<br />

depart as fast as they can. They are not going to want<br />

to wait for the Coast Guard Captain of the Port and local<br />

stakeholders to decide how to address a vessel with a<br />

suspected Ebola case.<br />

A simple answer would be to ban all ships that have<br />

stopped in Sierra Leone, Guinea, or Liberia in their<br />

last five previous ports of calls. Sadly, that won’t work<br />

because the U.S. government is sending U.S. ships to<br />

these countries to provide food aid and medical support.<br />

People in Ebola areas need to eat and U.S. grown crops<br />

are helping them to survive. It would immoral to stop<br />

shipping food to those in need.<br />

If the U.S. can’t ban all ships that have ported in<br />

Ebola-stricken countries, then the U.S. Coast Guard must<br />

develop a more comprehensive plan to address the<br />

possibility of Ebola victims arriving in the U.S. by sea. The<br />

agency can’t merely recommend that local stakeholders<br />

conduct table top exercises. These exercises should be<br />

mandatory and the Coast Guard must be ready to provide<br />

substantive guidance.<br />

Keeping in mind that several governors have already<br />

issued isolation guidance for air travelers, the Coast Guard<br />

must work the governors now to address the maritime<br />

sector. How are sick mariners evacuated? At sea via<br />

helicopter or a smaller vessel? At the port by ambulance?<br />

How is the vessel decontaminated? How and when are<br />

the necessary personnel going to be trained to carry<br />

out the evacuation and decontamination procedures?<br />

What happens to the other in-coming vessels during the<br />

decontamination process? If the Coast Guard can’t answer<br />

these questions, the state governors will because they<br />

won’t their ports contaminated with the Ebola virus. Ports<br />

bring in revenue and the revue can’t drop.<br />

The Coast Guard prides itself on being Semper<br />

Paratus. Now, more than ever, it must live up to its motto.<br />

The nation’s ports can’t be shut down because of Ebola<br />

and they won’t be if the Coast Guard develops more<br />

comprehensive guidance before the first ship arrives.<br />

Pre-planning with local stakeholders, including governors,<br />

will ensure that the country’s supply chain continues to<br />

operate. Call your local Captain of the Port and ask him<br />

or her to schedule the table top exercise. Ω<br />

PHYSICAL SECURITY<br />

with COMPLETE PERIMETER CONTROL<br />

ANTI-CLIMB FENCE RETRACTABLE WEDGES ANTI-RAM FENCE SECURITY BOLLARDS<br />

Call our perimeter security specialist at 866-467-2773 and visit us online at ameristarsecurity.com<br />

6 Government Security News <strong>October</strong>/<strong>November</strong> <strong>2014</strong> Digitlal <strong>Edition</strong> Digitlal <strong>Edition</strong> <strong>October</strong>/<strong>November</strong> <strong>2014</strong> Government Security News 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!