Chapter 3 Reading the Rocks - Saudi Aramco
Chapter 3 Reading the Rocks - Saudi Aramco
Chapter 3 Reading the Rocks - Saudi Aramco
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
80 energy to <strong>the</strong> world : Volume one<br />
reading <strong>the</strong> rocks 81<br />
Laundry workers in Bahrain wash<br />
clothing in a spring-fed creek in <strong>the</strong><br />
1940s. The numbering system used<br />
to track laundry was adopted by<br />
<strong>Aramco</strong> as <strong>the</strong> basis for its employee<br />
badge numbers. The 1940s-era<br />
badges of Frank Tracy and Yousef<br />
Al-Koheji are shown below.<br />
The Dark Days By <strong>the</strong> early fall of 1936, <strong>the</strong> Casoc geologists sensed trouble. The rock strata<br />
under <strong>the</strong> Dammam Dome at a depth where oil had been found on Bahrain were not producing as<br />
expected. Rumors spread that officials in San Francisco were beginning to have second thoughts<br />
and were trying to cut back on expenses wherever <strong>the</strong>y could. Davies later recalled this period<br />
as <strong>the</strong> “dark days” when “<strong>the</strong>re was a lot of apprehension felt that maybe <strong>Saudi</strong> Arabia had not<br />
been a good gamble after all.”<br />
“What’s Your Number?”<br />
Today every <strong>Saudi</strong> <strong>Aramco</strong> employee has an identification badge with an employee number.<br />
However, this has not always been <strong>the</strong> case.<br />
While some geologists began to second-guess <strong>the</strong>mselves, Steineke stood firm. Not only<br />
did Steineke avoid becoming distracted by <strong>the</strong> drilling problems in 1936, but he was using what<br />
Davies described as his rare “ability to tie toge<strong>the</strong>r obscure and isolated bits of information that<br />
most men and even most geologists would miss completely.” Steineke, who was named chief<br />
geologist in 1936, was in <strong>the</strong> process of identifying what Davies described as “certainly, <strong>the</strong><br />
outstanding monument to Max’s unusual abilities in <strong>Saudi</strong> Arabia.”<br />
Davies recalled suffering through one particularly hot and hazy day in <strong>the</strong> latter part of 1936:<br />
Max came to me and said, ”Fred, I want to take you out and show you <strong>the</strong> next<br />
<strong>Saudi</strong> Arabian oil field.“ That sounded good to me. All we had was Dammam, so we<br />
drove out southwest in <strong>the</strong> direction of where Abqaiq is now. … Max got out just like<br />
a bird dog, started out through those sand dunes. Every one looked exactly alike to me,<br />
and we finally landed up in a little cup between <strong>the</strong> sand dunes … in which <strong>the</strong>re was an<br />
outcrop of Eocene limestone. Max bent over and knocked off a hunk of rock, held it up<br />
with great pride and said, ”See that, Fred, that’s Eocene limestone. …“ He pointed out<br />
a distance of five miles [eight kilometers]—and I couldn’t see a quarter of a mile [400<br />
meters]. ”That’s Jebel Dam.“ And <strong>the</strong>n he pointed out, ”See, that’s Jebel [Ghuraymil],“<br />
which was 10 miles [16 kilometers] away. … Oil, he said, in both <strong>the</strong>se places had to be<br />
below <strong>the</strong> ground. ”So, <strong>the</strong>refore, we have a structure <strong>the</strong>re and we ought to drill it.”<br />
I looked at him in astonishment, and I wouldn’t dare contradict him—”Certainly<br />
you may be right, but I can’t even see what you are pointing at.“ But his enthusiasm<br />
was such that in a short time we drilled right at that location and we found this big<br />
Abqaiq field.<br />
Casoc’s original operations were small enough that all record keeping was done using<br />
employees’ last names. The only real confusion occurred when laundry was shipped weekly<br />
to an Indian cleaning service in Bahrain, where <strong>the</strong> clo<strong>the</strong>s were washed in what became<br />
known as Button Creek, <strong>the</strong> runoff from an artesian spring. Clo<strong>the</strong>s were mixed up when <strong>the</strong>y<br />
were washed, and employees often received <strong>the</strong> wrong garments. The later influx of workers<br />
exacerbated <strong>the</strong> problem. To address this concern, in 1938 <strong>the</strong> company started assigning<br />
numbers that employees could use to label <strong>the</strong>ir laundry. These numbers were generally<br />
assigned chronologically in order of employment with <strong>the</strong> company. Vacated numbers were<br />
reassigned to new employees when <strong>the</strong>y arrived.<br />
The number system worked so well for laundry that it was gradually used for o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
purposes. Bahrain store owners, for example, started accepting chits with employee laundry<br />
numbers on <strong>the</strong>m instead of having employees haul bags of coins. Charles Rodstrom, Casoc’s<br />
agent in Bahrain, redeemed <strong>the</strong> chits from merchants and forwarded <strong>the</strong>m to Dhahran<br />
where <strong>the</strong>y would be deducted from employees’ “field allotments.” In 1944, <strong>the</strong> company<br />
started using <strong>the</strong> laundry numbers to keep track of employees in all personnel systems. Floyd<br />
Anderson, who was in charge of laundry at <strong>the</strong> time, assigned himself No. 1, but typically<br />
<strong>the</strong> lower I.D. numbers corresponded to <strong>the</strong> earliest employees. For example, ‘Abd al-‘Aziz<br />
Al-Shalfan, <strong>Aramco</strong>’s longest-serving employee when he died in 1983, was No. 4. Over <strong>the</strong><br />
past six decades, <strong>the</strong> I.D. numbers have become longer and <strong>the</strong> badges more intricate—<strong>the</strong><br />
numbers are now supplemented with bar codes, and holograms ensure <strong>the</strong> au<strong>the</strong>nticity<br />
of <strong>the</strong> badges—but <strong>the</strong>y remain <strong>the</strong> primary means of administrative identification.<br />
With <strong>the</strong> help of observations from his teams, Steineke had been able to deduce a considerable<br />
amount of information from surface indications, including <strong>the</strong> probable location of <strong>the</strong><br />
Abqaiq field, which was confirmed by exploratory drilling a few years later.<br />
Yet <strong>the</strong> geologists still lacked a comprehensive understanding of <strong>the</strong> sedimentary rock<br />
strata underlying <strong>the</strong> huge concession. To help fill in <strong>the</strong> massive gaps in <strong>the</strong>ir knowledge, a<br />
team led by Henry began a program of structure drilling in November 1936. Structure drilling,<br />
a technique adapted by Steineke in response to <strong>the</strong> challenges posed by <strong>the</strong> sprawling <strong>Saudi</strong><br />
concession, involved drilling a number of relatively shallow wells of about 300 to 610 meters to<br />
acquire samples of <strong>the</strong> underlying rocks. (Many of <strong>the</strong>se wells were later turned into water wells<br />
for <strong>the</strong> Bedouin tribes.) The samples from areas hundreds of kilometers apart were compared<br />
to check, for example, for continuity of a particular layer of limestone at a given depth. It took<br />
months, however, for <strong>the</strong> teams to begin comparing results and drawing conclusions.<br />
Dahl Hit In late March and early April 1937, while <strong>the</strong> structure-drilling program was continuing,<br />
Steineke made what many Socal geologists later realized was a historic trip. He led a large party,<br />
including Lloyd Hamilton and Fred Davies from <strong>the</strong> Dhahran camp, to Riyadh and <strong>the</strong>n on to<br />
Jiddah, where Hamilton caught a steamer back to Socal’s London office and Davies continued<br />
on to San Francisco.<br />
On <strong>the</strong> return trip, Steineke, accompanied by chief mechanic Floyd Meeker, significantly<br />
expanded his understanding of Arabian geology. The region <strong>the</strong>y passed through west of Riyadh<br />
marks <strong>the</strong> boundary between <strong>the</strong> ancient basement rock of <strong>the</strong> Arabian Shield and <strong>the</strong> sedimentary<br />
layers of <strong>the</strong> Arabian Shelf. In many places along this interface, giant escarpments (or cliffs, <strong>the</strong><br />
most prominent being <strong>the</strong> Tuwaiq Escarpment) and deep wells or collapsed depressions reveal<br />
hundreds of millions of years’ worth of sedimentary layering.<br />
Just what Steineke observed on this trip and what conclusions he reached remain a matter<br />
of conjecture. His journal notations do not provide absolute evidence. A veteran <strong>Saudi</strong> <strong>Aramco</strong><br />
geologist, Tom Keith, later pored over Steineke’s field books for a history of company geologists<br />
and offered his insights about <strong>the</strong> return trip: