FEMLAB - KTH

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 1. K. Sundberg, K. Dreij, A. Seidel and B. Jernstrom.Gluthion Conjugation and DNA Adduct Formation of Dibenzol [a,1] pyrene and Benzo [a] pyrene Diol Epoxides in V79 Cells Stably expressing Different Human Glutathione Transferases. Chemical research in Toxicology ,2002,15, pp. 170-179 2. A. Hartmann, E. M. Golet, S. Gartiser, et al. Primary DNA Damage But Not Mutagenicity Correlates with Ciprofloxacin Concentrations in German Hospital Wastewaters Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, February 1999, pp. 115 - 119. 3. COMSOL AB, Chemical Engineering Module. 2004, Stockholm, p. 213 4. COMSOL AB, Thin Film Approximation, http://www.comsol.com/support/knowledgebase/902.php. 5. H. Fredrick, A. Barbero. Steady-state flux and lag time in stratum cornium lipid pathway using finite element methods. Journal of pharmaceutical Sciences. Vol 92, NO.11, November 2003, pp. 2196-2207. 6. Lars Erik Persson, Leif Persson, Nols Svanstedt and John Wyller, The Homogenization Method, an introduction. England, Chartwell Bratt, 1993. 7. Jacob Bear and Yehuda Bachmat, Introduction to Modelling of Transport Phenomena in Porous Media, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic , 1990. 8. COMSOL AB, Model Library, <strong>FEMLAB</strong>3. Stockholm, 2004. 9. COMSOL AB, Chemical Engineering Module, Stockholm, 2002, pp. 2-253, 2-254. 10. COMSOL AB, <strong>FEMLAB</strong>3 Users’ Guide. Stockholm, 2004. 24
List of Abbreviations A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DNA adducts B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . gluthione conjugates b.c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . boundary condition D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . diffusion coefficient Dar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . weighted arithmetic mean diffusion coefficient D eff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . effective diffusion coefficient D ha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . weighted harmonic mean diffusion coefficient C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .diol epoxides GST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . gluthatione transferase K.I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Karolinska Institutet Kp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . partition coefficient REV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . representative elementary volume U . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tetrols 25
Page 1 and 2: Mathematical Modelling and Numerica
Page 3 and 4: Abstract In order to shed more ligh
Page 5 and 6: Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The Phy
Page 7 and 8: Chapter 1 Introduction The aim of t
Page 9 and 10: Chapter 2 The Physical Problem and
Page 11 and 12: Ci + water −→ Ui at rate kiCi (
Page 13 and 14: Chapter 3 Scaling and Reformulation
Page 15 and 16: Chapter 4 Simplification of problem
Page 17 and 18: and since ▽ 2 φ is constant over
Page 19 and 20: 4.3 Solving for concentration; Frac
Page 21 and 22: Chapter 5 Model Implementation with
Page 23 and 24: Figure 5.1. The computational Domai
Page 25 and 26: Physical subdomain Femlab Subdomain
Page 27 and 28: Figure 5.3. C in solution plotted a
Page 29: Figure 6.1. Concentration of A in t

FEMLAB - KTH

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?