28.11.2014 Views

Remake, Remodel: The Evolution Of The Record Label

Remake, Remodel: The Evolution Of The Record Label

Remake, Remodel: The Evolution Of The Record Label

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This pre-draft version is strictly for review purposes only and is not for general dissemination or sharing.<br />

Beyond the financial: investment in nurturing talent<br />

Brian Message believes that over-investment can crush acts’ creativity. He describes an<br />

artist on his books that spent £150,000 making their first album, £25,000 on album two<br />

and he estimates the next one will cost nearer £12,000 when it is finished. He says that<br />

belief and trust in acts is of paramount importance – and in such circumstances,<br />

investment can be kept tight.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that this money is non-returnable in unsuccessful cases is important.<br />

One label MD we spoke to commented, ‘Venture capital (as a source of investment) will<br />

come after you and want that money back and shut you down if you don’t give it back.<br />

<strong>Record</strong> companies don’t do that.’<br />

But mainly the fact that it comes bundled with a set of skills and expertise from the<br />

record label has probably resulted in labels continuing to be the dominant source of<br />

finance.<br />

For new acts, this is especially relevant, with Martin Mills commenting, ‘If you are<br />

developing a new artist, I’m not sure if money is where you need to start. You need to<br />

start with buzz and profile.’<br />

Shabs Jobanputra says that it isn’t as simple as just funding a record. ‘It’s about how you<br />

take it to market,’ he says. ‘It’s timing. It’s understanding. It’s nuance. Hundreds of tiny<br />

decisions in a campaign that can lead to success or failure.’<br />

Alison Wenham states, ‘Investment is not just about money. It’s belief, it’s infrastructure,<br />

and it’s administering and promoting rights around the world.’<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> power is where the money is’<br />

Emma Banks.<br />

<strong>The</strong> financial sector remains very reluctant to invest in the creative arts, preferring to<br />

put their money into tools and services such as SoundCloud and Songkick. <strong>The</strong>y will,<br />

however, back creators and copyright holders with a proven track record and a clear<br />

revenue history.<br />

This means that, for investment in new talent and those creating new IP, the onus once<br />

again falls on artist managers, publishers (to an extent) and a few fan-funded vehicles;<br />

but the biggest backer of this new creative talent remains record companies.<br />

One artist manager informed us that most investment models are not interested in new<br />

acts so for a breaking artist they have to rely on a manager making that initial<br />

investment and they will then take the act to a label to bring them to the next stage. <strong>The</strong><br />

City was not, they said, prepared to get dirt under their fingernails in this way.<br />

For Emma Banks, the best approach is to invest, take a cut of ancillary income but not<br />

necessarily insist that you as an investor are the best person to run the other areas of an<br />

act’s career (such as merchandise).<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!