28.11.2014 Views

Remake, Remodel: The Evolution Of The Record Label

Remake, Remodel: The Evolution Of The Record Label

Remake, Remodel: The Evolution Of The Record Label

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This pre-draft version is strictly for review purposes only and is not for general dissemination or sharing.<br />

However, there is also a body of opinion that says that P2P isn’t really the issue, and that<br />

the problem is major corporations trying to defend traditional and outmoded business<br />

models and not developing sufficiently compelling new ones quickly enough .<br />

Meanwhile, the industry has experimented with a variety of digital business models<br />

since the advent of Napster 1.0.<br />

In 2001 AOL Time Warner, EMI and BMG teamed up to form MusicNet, described as a<br />

digital music platform. Around the same time, Sony and Universal Music created a joint<br />

venture in the shape of Pressplay – an online music store.<br />

Neither of these models got off the ground due to limited catalogue range, stumblings<br />

over the cross-licensing of catalogue and also because the labels had very little<br />

experience in retailing and consumer marketing (indeed their price points and usage<br />

terms, restricted by DRM, came in for huge criticism at the time).<br />

It was the launch of Apple’s iTunes Store in 2003 in the US (and 2004 in Europe) that<br />

provided the first commercial digital music offer to capture the imagination of the<br />

mainstream consumer.<br />

Fully integrated with Apple’s hardware (computers and iPods) through the iTunes<br />

ripping and music management software, the iTunes Store provided a compelling<br />

consumer experience in fixed-line downloads and part of the key to its success was its<br />

simplicity of use.<br />

<strong>The</strong> positive knock-on effects for the take up of Apple hardware from the music store<br />

enabled Apple to invest in iTunes with powerful marketing campaigns, the costs of<br />

which could be justified because of the cross-marketing benefits. It is unlikely that<br />

iTunes could have afforded to make such a big noise had it been a standalone digital<br />

store that wasn’t part of something bigger.<br />

<strong>The</strong> iTunes model has dominated the digital music market with an estimated share of<br />

over 70 per cent of the total market – despite a raft of new entrants and start-ups. In the<br />

UK alone, there are over 60 digital business models licensed by music labels – all<br />

offering access to music in a variety of ways.<br />

Despite this enormous diversity, in March 2011 a report by independent label trade<br />

body AIM showed that just three services made up over 94 per cent of total indies global<br />

digital revenues – iTunes, Amazon MP3 and Spotify 33 .<br />

Amazon’s service uses its massive consumer database to sell music as MP3 in direct<br />

competition to iTunes and uses price differentiation as a marketing tool, often<br />

undercutting iTunes (with tracks for as little as £0.29 compared to a general standard of<br />

£0.79 on iTunes). <strong>The</strong> Amazon download service dovetails very smoothly into the<br />

iTunes music management software but, despite this, it remains a distant second to the<br />

Apple service.<br />

33 AIM Submission To <strong>The</strong> Hargreaves Review, Mar 2011 – last accessed 09.05.11<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!