(Working notes) TOWN OF ROCKY HILL PLANNING AND ZONING ...

(Working notes) 

TOWN OF ROCKY HILL 

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 

MEETING OF MAY 18, 2011 

1. CALL TO ORDER 

Chairman Tony DiLorenzo called the Wednesday, May 18, 2011 meeting to order at 7:00 

p.m. in the Town Council Room of the Rocky Hill Town Hall, 761 Old Main Street, 

Rocky Hill, Connecticut. 

Present: 

Tony DiLorenzo, Chairman 

Barry Goldberg, Vice Chairman 

Ron Angelo, Sr., Secretary 

Henry Vasel, Commissioner 

Greg Faulkner, Commissioner 

Alternates: 

Also: 

Joe Kochanek 

Victor Zarrilli 

Peter Arico 

Sar Minakan, Zoning Enforcement Officer 

2. PUBLIC 

Mr. Jim Zagroba of 263 Meadow Road addressed the Commission to discuss a letter 

he submitted dated April 27, 2011 regarding the Rocky Hill Plan of Conservation and 

Development. He asked that this letter be made part of the record for the evening’s 

meeting. Mr. Zagroba said according to Public Act 07-239, it would be helpful to have 

the assistance of a professional to help the Town to create their Plan. There are certain 

mandates that are required in order for Towns to have eligibility for municipal grants. He 

said he is looking forward to participating in the forums that the Town will be holding. 

Mr. John Enkel addressed the Commission asking to be added to the agenda in order to 

request the placement of 2 clothing boxes at the Rocky Hill Wal-Mart. 

Ms. Krista and Sophie Mariner of 58 Farms Village Road addressed the Commission 

She said the Commission is going to be discussing the concept of a Waterfront District 

this evening and she said there is already a study in process by the land expert, Sue 

Moses, who has mapped out the Route 3 area including land located east of Route 99. 

She has already determined what type of development should occur on every piece of

Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 

Meeting of May 18, 2011 

vacant and undeveloped land over the next several years. The Mariner’s felt this study 

should be taken into consideration when talking about the Waterfront District. 

Mr. John Farnham of 902 Grey Fox Lane addressed the Commission. The first item 

he brought up was the $5,000 bond for Parcel 16 for landscaping. He would like it used 

to fulfill the landscaping site plan that was submitted. Mr. Farnham discussed the 

pathway that was eliminated at the West Hill Estates. He doesn’t feel this matter has had 

a final resolution. There is a State Statute that applied to both the Parcel 16 matter and 

the West Hill Estates matter. According to this Statute, “the declarant shall complete all 

improvements depicted on any site plan, other graphic representation, including any 

survey or plans prepared pursuant to Section 47.228, whether or not the site plan or other 

graphic representation is contained in the public offering statement or not.” Mr. Farnham 

said the developers have an obligation to complete the site plans as proposed. 

Mr. Farnham then referenced the Town’s Charter, Section 608 stating that, “there shall be 

a Planning and Zoning Commission appointed by the Town Council consisting of 5 

members and 3 alternate members to be appointed on the first Council Meeting in 

January following the bi-annual election for 2-year terms. No more than three members 

and two alternate members of the said Commission shall be members of the same 

political party.” Mr. Farnham said he things the Commission may be in violation of this 

Charter and asked for an explanation. 

Mr. Farnham was concerned that items were being approved on the Consent Agenda that 

would not allow the public an opportunity to comment. Chairman DiLorenzo said the 

three items on the Consent Agenda regarding changes to Zoning Regulations are only for 

approval to send them to a public hearing at a future date. If there is any objection to 

something being approved on the Consent Agenda the public can address that during the 

Public portion of any meeting, prior to the approval of the Consent Agenda. 

3. ADOPT THE AGENDA 

A MOTION was made by Commissioner Vasel to adopt the Agenda with the 

following changes: 

• Add under Agenda Items, item E. Wal-Mart Clothing Bins 

• Add under Agenda Items, item F. Discussion of Route 3 Traffic Study 

Commissioner Goldberg noted that there was a memo from Kim Ricci, Director of 

Planning and Building regarding the Consent Agenda. Kim suggested removing items C 

& D if the Commission wanted to discuss whether or not to send them to a public 

hearing. The Board agreed to send C & D to a public hearing. 

Seconded by Vice Chairman Goldberg. All were in favor, MOTION CARRIED 

UNANIMOUSLY. 

4. CONSENT AGENDA



A MOTION was made by Vice Chairman Goldberg to approve the Consent 

Agenda. Seconded by Commissioner Vasel. All were in favor, MOTION 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The following items were approved as part of the 

Consent Agenda: 

A. Approve Minutes and Working Notes from April 20, 2011; 

B. Set a Public Hearing date for, Wednesday June 15, 2011 beginning at 6:30 

p.m. in the Council Room, Second Floor of the Rocky Hill Town Hall, 761 

Old Main Street, Rocky Hill, CT to consider a Zone Change Application, for 

Richard W. Vicino, proposing to change the zoning from OP- Office Park 

and C-Commercial to C-Commercial Zoning District for approximately 

twenty-six (26) acres of property located on the southeast corner of the 

intersection of West Street and Cromwell Avenue (Route 3), currently 

owned by CL&P, Parcels ID 16-267 and 16-268; 

C. Set a Public Hearing date for, Wednesday July 20, 2011 beginning at 6:30 

p.m. in the Council Room, Second Floor of the Rocky Hill Town Hall, 761 

Old Main Street, Rocky Hill, CT to consider a Proposed Zoning Regulation 

Amendments, Town of Rocky Hill, proposing to modify the Rocky Hill 

Zoning Regulations: (strikethrough is to be deleted bold italic is to be 

added) 

1. Proposed definition amendment of “filling” under Section 2.2 of the Rocky Hill 

Zoning Regulations, as follows: 

2.2 Definitions… 

FILLING: The depositing of clean fill such as soil, sand, gravel, rock, or clay, 

asphalt millings, and/or other materials determined to be acceptable under the 

Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, as may be 

amended. 

And; 

2. Proposed amendment to Section 7.12.2 B of the Rocky Hill Zoning Regulation 

7.12. EARTH REMOVAL AND FILLING 

7.12.2 Minimum Requirements for Filling 

B. The fill material shall consist of earth fill, woody 

vegetation, and masonry only. Materials used must meet the definition 

of “Filling.” No trash, garbage, building materials, or junk of any 

nature shall be permitted.



D. Set a public hearing immediately following another hearing, which is 

scheduled to begin at 6:30p.m. on Wednesday, July 20, 2011 in the Council 

Room, second floor Town Hall, 761 Old Main Street, Rocky Hill, CT to 

consider, Proposed Zoning Regulation Amendment, Town of Rocky Hill, 

add (bold) to the definition of “street” under 

Section 2.2 Defined Terms: 

STREET: A public thoroughfare that affords the principal means of access to 

abutting property. The term ‘street” shall mean and include only: (1) a street 

accepted as a Town Street; (2) a street whose layout has been approved by the 

Commission; or (3) a street maintained by the Town. 

Add: 

A street, under (1) and (3) above, shall be constructed of a pervious and an 

impervious layer only, unless located within a Floodplain Overlay District or a 

wetland, in which case only a pervious layer is required. Such pervious layer shall 

consist of fill and/or other materials determined to be acceptable under the 

Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, as may be 

amended. 

E. Set a public hearing immediately following another hearing, which is 

scheduled to begin at 6:30p.m. on Wednesday, June 15, 2011 in the Council 

Room, second floor Town Hall, 761 Old Main Street, Rocky Hill, CT to 

consider, Special Permit/Site Plan Application, ACCUBRANCH, LLC, 

proposing an ATM drive-thru with other site improvements for the 

conversion of a former restaurant (former Tim Horton’s) to a bank, for 

property located at (1881) 1901 Silas Deane Highway in a C-Commercial 

Zoning District; ID # 04-353; 

5. AGENDA ITEMS 

A. Discussion, Alfred D. Chiulli III, of an idea for the creation of a new zoning 

district “Waterfront Commercial District:” 

Section 4.1.5 Waterfront Commercial District (Modified 3-21-2011) 

Purpose: To provide mixed uses and services that are compatible with and 

appropriate to Connecticut River and railroad proximity in areas supported 

by the transportation infrastructure with site design standards to maintain 

compatibility with nearby commercial, residential and office park districts, 

Site Plan Uses: 

The following uses shall be permitted within the waterfront commercial 

district subject to site plan approval in accordance with Section 8.2 and the 

applicable standards of Section 6 and 7 except where grandfathered



A. General warehousing and distribution of goods manufactured or 

assembled on the premises 

B. Marinas 

C. Sale, storage, repair and towing of new and used boats, jet skis, cars and 

trucks in accordance with Section 7 

D. Contractor and landscaper yards 

E. Power generation: water and wind power; 

F. Public and Private recreation; 

G. Wholesale commercial 

H. Mixed uses 

Special Permit Uses: 

The following uses shall be permitted within the waterfront commercial 

district subject to site plan approval and issuance of a special permit in 

accordance with Section 8.3: 

A. Retail stores, as an accessory use 

B. Fuel terminal 

C. Offices; 

D Restaurant and similar eating establishments as an accessory use 

E. Sale of alcoholic beverages as an accessory use 

F. Manufacturing; 

G. Communication towers; 

H. Commercial Amusements: water 

Mr. Al Chiulli of 499 Pleasant Valley Rocky Hill addressed the Commission. He is 

suggesting that the Town adopt a new zone called the Waterfront Commercial District. 

There are two areas in the Town zoned Waterfront and his property is in the industrial 

park. The original building on his property predated any zoning regulations. The 

original waterfront zone was created when Pratt and Whitney was for sale, Valspar was 

for sale and the railroad was not active. But since then the Pratt and Whitney property 

and the Valspar properties sold and the pieces were developed commercially. Mr. Chiulli 

said his property is unique because he is the only property that has a deep-water dock, 

and is on an active rail. He met with staff to get their input and has since made some 

changes due to their suggestions. He would like to move forward with this process so he 

can develop the property. He said the Director of Building told him once they agree on 

the proposed District it must then go before the Town Council to set a public hearing. If 

the zone is approved then Mr. Chiulli will have to come to Planning and Zoning to 

request that his property is rezoned to the new Waterfront Commercial Zone. 

Vice Chairman Goldberg said in the past he made a promise to the residents that the 

Commission would take another look at the Waterfront District. He said Mr. Chiulli is 

free to present his case for the changes he would like to see in the Waterfront District, 

including expending his own funds for a study and report. 

Mr. Chiulli said it sounded like Vice Chairman Goldberg was “politicking”. Vice 

Chairman Goldberg said he objected to that comment. Chairman DiLorenzo said he



would not tolerate personal attacks. Mr. Chiulli said he isn’t trying to change the 

riverfront zone down by the ferry because that is a residential area. He is in an industrial 

park. He was involved in the creation of the Waterfront District but since then, 

circumstances have changed in his area and he can no longer build houses on his 

property. 

Chairman DiLorenzo said the Town is beginning work on a new Plan of Conservation 

and Development, which will include a study of the entire town to plan for future use and 

development. If Mr. Chiulli’s property is mis-zoned, that is something that the Town will 

look at. 

Vice Chairman Goldberg said that he made a commitment to review the Waterfront 

District for comments. If Mr. Chiulli is proposing a change, then he has to submit the 

proper language for the Planning and Zoning Commission to administer that language for 

how the Commission should make the change if it is approved. 

Mr. Chiulli said the property was not mis-zoned. What happened was that Planning and 

Zoning allowed all his surrounding property owners to have commercial uses on their 

properties, which now makes it impossible for him to have a waterfront district use on his 

site. As far as the wording of Mr. Chiulli’s proposed change, Mr. Chiulli said the 

wording came verbatim from the Town’s Planning & Zoning Regulations. He also said 

he went over this with Mrs. Ricci, the Director of Planning and Building. He said he 

doesn’t think it is feasible to ask him to wait 1-2 years until the Town gets around to 

updating their Plan of Conservation and Development. 

Vice Chairman Goldberg asked if Mr. Chiulli was trying to change the uses under a 

Waterfront District. He also pointed out that one of Mr. Chiulli’s proposed uses is a “fuel 

terminal” and the Town doesn’t have a definition for a fuel terminal in the Regulations. 

He said Mr. Chiulli’s submittal was incomplete. Mr. Chiulli disagreed. He said this 

property became a fuel terminal in 1932 before there were any Zoning Regulations and if 

the Town wanted a definition of a fuel terminal then they should have done it themselves 

because it was a preexisting condition before the Regulations were drafted. 

Chairman DiLorenzo said he didn’t feel that Mr. Chiulli’s presentation was fully ready 

for adoption as a regulation. He suggested Mr. Chiulli wait for the Town to do a study 

and come up with a new Plan of Conservation and Development. If that weren’t 

satisfactory then Mr. Chiulli should meet with staff and “flesh out” the details in order to 

submit to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their approval. Mr. Chiulli said he 

already met with the staff and made adjustments and they sent him back to Planning and 

Zoning. Now Planning and Zoning said it isn’t finalized and he should go back and meet 

with staff again. Mr. Chiulli said maybe he should be meeting with the Planning and 

Zoning Commission since they are the ones who don’t feel it is adequate. He would just 

like to move forward with the next step of the process. Chairman DiLorenzo asked Mr. 

Chiulli to meet with staff again to “flesh out any deficiencies” and they would advise him 

how to proceed.



A MOTION was made by Vice Chairman Goldberg to table the Discussion, Alfred 

D. Chiulli III, of an idea for the creation of a new zoning district “Waterfront 

Commercial District until the next meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Vasel. All 

were in favor, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 

B. Discussion, James Zagroba, potential zone change for a portion of the 

current designated Waterfront Zoning District to R-20 Residential Zoning 

District, properties along Meadow Road and to the north; 

Mr. Jim Zagroba of 263 Meadow Road addressed the Commission. He said the two 

areas under discussion this evening are Waterfront South (where Mr. Chiulli’s property is 

located) and Waterfront North, which he would like to talk about. He submitted and read 

a letter dated May 18, 2011 regarding a potential zone change for the Waterfront District 

“North”. Mr. Zagroba said 10 years ago a petition was submitted asking that the 

properties on Meadow Road remain residential. If spite of this petition they were 

rezoned Waterfront District. In the past 10 years the Town made a commitment to take 

ownership of the Foundry and make it open space. Meadow Road is still a “mixed use” 

but is showing greater residential development. The Foundry parking lot on Glastonbury 

Avenue is listed as “residential”. Many homes on Meadow Road are not on the National 

Historic Registry, including the Ferry. Mr. Zagroba believes because of these facts, the 

neighborhood has earned the right to be residentially zoned. He went on to discuss his 

ideas for a Waterfront Management Plan as developed by the residents on Meadow Road 

and the Riverfront Preservation Society. 

The Waterfront Management Plan purpose is to energize the waterfront, revitalize 

residential neighborhoods, protect parks and open space and increase access to waterfront 

destination. He presented these 5 general themes to guide them in developing the 

waterfront: 

• Mitigate pollution. 

• Design infrastructure to allow access to the waterfront. 

• Plan for a great Riverfront park system. 

• Celebrate the important Historical Destination and protect the Ferry park 

neighborhoods. 

• Protect the riverfront by viewing it as a “sensitive to development. 

Mr. Zagroba pointed out that the statewide goal for open space is 20% yet Rocky Hill 

currently has only 7.1%. He believes the Town can do better than that in the next 10 

years. He said he is willing to work with the Commission to decide what to do along the 

Riverfront. He offered his services and said there are a lot of talented people in Town 

who along with graduate schools who might be able to help with the Plan of 

Conservation and Development. 

C. Pre-Application Review under Section 8.1A Rocky Hill Zoning Regulations, 

Patrick Gorman with the LRC Group, to discuss a possible application for a 

mixed use development, 144 multi family units and approximately 5, 750



square feet of medical office use for property located on the north side of 

Brook Street, in a OP-Office Park Zoning District; ID # 16-274; 

Vice Chairman Goldberg pointed out that Chairman DiLorenzo had raised and issue with 

this application that resulted in a legal opinion from the Town Attorney. The issue has to 

do with whether or not a particular use is permitted according to the Regulations. 

Chairman DiLorenzo said the Attorney’s response is on the table this evening. 

Commissioner Vasel made a MOTION for a 5-minute recess. Seconded by 

Commissioner Arico. All were in favor, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 

Chairman DiLorenzo said some of the Commissioners were concerned about the 

residential use being proposed because the 2001 Plan of Conservation and Development 

included a strategy of eliminating multi-family housing. This mixed zone does permit 

residential uses but there is some dispute as to whether multi-family homes would be 

permissible. 

Mr. Pat Gorman of LRC Group addressed the Commission representing the applicants. 

For the benefit of new Commissioners he gave a history of the property. This is a 9.8 

acre piece of property that is zoned Office Park. They received a Wetlands Permit in 

2007 then submitted a site plan later in the year that was denied without prejudice. They 

resubmitted a special application, which was ultimately withdrawn because of concerns 

about the layout. Mr. Gorman said he believes this submittal addresses most of the 

concerns that the P&Z Commission had at that time. Some concerns were the amount of 

truck traffic on Brook Street, the size of the development and the impact on abutting 

properties. 

Mr. Gorman said he believes this application is a good fit for such an odd shaped 

property with limited frontage. They are proposing smaller, attractive 3-story buildings 

with a footprint of 8,000-9,000 sq. ft. The apartments would be rentals only. There are a 

lot of sidewalks with a clubhouse in the center of the site. Mr. Winstanley has had an 

outstanding response to this development and is currently working with Continental 

Global Ventures. 

This development would not have trucks going in and out except during construction, 

which would take approximately 18 months. As a residential use the traffic would be offpeak. 

All buildings including the clubhouse will have infiltrators. Mr. Gorman said he 

heard that according to the Route 3 and Brook Street intersection is operating better than 

anticipated. At this point the applicant is looking for any comments the Commission 

might have. 

Mr. Howard Rapopport of 201 West 70 th Street, New York, New York addressed the 

Commission. He is a principal with Continental Global Ventures, who are developers 

and operators of rental housing. They operate in excess of 4,500 rental apartments. They 

feel this application addresses a demand for modern workforce housing and people who 

live and work in Rocky Hill would most likely occupy the units. Mr. Rappoport said



there would also be an outdoor pool. The medical office building along Brook Street 

would be approximately 5,750 sq. ft. There will be 1 and 2 bedroom units only and 

would be about 750 sq. ft. to 1,100 sq. ft. There would be no elevators in the buildings. 

Mr. Gorman said they would present studies that show that there is a very low number of 

rental units for the number of employees in the area. 

Mr. Rappoport said they would restrict all truck traffic from going east on Brook Street. 

Commissioner Faulkner asked if they took into account how this development would 

impact schools. Mr. Denton Hopper, Land Use Planner for Levy and Joanie said 

studies have shown that except for single-family homes, just about every other use has a 

positive impact on the financial arrangements of the Town. They feel these would really 

be starter homes and as families have children they would probably move on to a 

different arrangement. Commissioner Faulkner asked if they took into account the fact 

that they had another application for a medical office development in the same area. Mr. 

Gorman said they used the medical office use because that has the worst traffic scenario 

but this doesn’t have to be used for medical offices. Commissioner Faulkner said he 

hopes the applicant will present studies showing that these apartments will most likely be 

filled. Mr. Gorman said since Century Hills was constructed, 2 million square feet of 

business have been built and that creates a high demand for local housing. 

Vice Chairman Goldberg said since they eliminated multi-family housing zones the 

Commission has debated whether or not they should bring it back. He asked the 

applicant to find out what percentage of rental housing and condominiums are vacant 

versus what is occupied. Mr. Gorman said they would get that information and he 

pointed out that right now there is a high demand for rental apartments in Connecticut. 

Vice Chairman Goldberg said he is also concerned about the additional traffic that will be 

added to Brook Street and he asked for a review of traffic on Brook Street all the way up 

to Route 3. He also said any information about tax dollars being brought to the Town is 

not part of the function of Planning and Zoning. 

Commissioner questioned the fact that they are building 3-story units without any 

elevators. Mr. Rappoport said in their experience you really only need elevators when 

you go to four stories. 

Chairman DiLorenzo asked if there are any trails on the adjacent properties that this 

applicant can connect to. Mr. Gorman said none that he is aware of but he reminded the 

Commission that you really couldn’t cross the brook in that area. Chairman DiLorenzo 

asked if they would consider adding a bocce court. Mr. Gorman said they have the room 

for something of that nature and they can look into it. 

Mr. Denny Harper asked when they might get an answer about the multi-family use on 

this property. Chairman DiLorenzo said that they would be asking the Town Attorney to 

answer that question in an “expeditious manner”.



Public 

Ms. Krista and Sophie Mariner of 58 Farms Village Road asked if the apartments 

would be market rate or affordable housing. She asked if there would be state of the art 

soundproofing because of the proximity to Burris. She asked that the Police Department 

sign off on the project. Ms. Mariner suggested that to solve the mixed use issue the 

applicant take out the medical office building and plant apple trees along the sidewalks so 

they would legally have an apple orchard, which would be acceptable as a mixed use. 

Mr. Gorman said he is keeping the same limits of disturbance that he proposed with the 

previous application. 

Mr. John Bedlack of 7 Murphy Drive said 144 units is a lot of units to put on only 9.8 

acres of property. Because of the lack of elevators these apartments are not going to be 

geared for seniors. He said this might not be the time to take the restrictions off multifamily 

housing since there is so much of it in the immediate area. He asked if there was 

any possibility that the developer would give some open space to the Town. Mr. Gorman 

said they are not claiming that this housing is for seniors. There is a high demand for 

workforce housing. He said they would definitely consider transferring some land to 

conservation easements and open space for the Town. 

D. Site Plan Application, TABSHEY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, proposing to 

construct a 500 square foot building addition to be used as an office on the 

front of the building located at 1218 Cromwell Avenue, in a BP- Business 

Park Zoning District, ID # 20-016; 

Mr. Roger Tabshey of 80 Hunter’s Ridge addressed the Commission. He is proposing 

a 500 sq. ft. addition to his building. Mr. Tabshey submitted a rendering of the additional 

office. 

Mr. Minakan said Mr. Tabshey received a variance for the setback from the Zoning 

Board of Appeals last night. 

Vice Chairman Goldberg asked if there were any zoning violations currently on this site. 

Mr. Minakan said not that he knows of. 

Commissioner Kochanek asked if this is a year round building. Mr. Tabshey said it is. 

A MOTION was made by Commissioner Vasel to approve the Site Plan Application, 

TABSHEY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, proposing to construct a 500 square foot 

building addition to be used as an office on the front of the building located at 1218 

Cromwell Avenue, in a BP- Business Park Zoning District including all staff 

comments. Seconded by Commissioner Angelo. All were in favor, MOTION 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 

E. Wal-Mart Clothes Bins



Mr. John Enkel of 17 Arapaho Drive in East Hartford addressed the Commission. He 

works for a company that recycles clothes and shoes. They try to raise money for the 

Children’s Medical Network for cancer. They already have approval from the Wal-Mart 

Manager to place these 2 bins on their site in the garden area. He submitted a photo to 

the Commission showing where the bins would be going. Mr. Enkel said they are a 

charitable organization and usually give back about $50,000 a year to the Children’s 

Medical Network. Bins will be serviced 2-3 times a week or as needed. 

A MOTION was made by Commissioner Vasel to approve 2 clothing bins to be 

placed on the Wal-Mart Property, including all staff comments. Seconded by 

Commissioner Angelo. All were in favor, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 

Commissioner Vasel asked if staff found out if the clothing bins at Krauser’s and 

Wethersfield Glass had permits. Mr. Minakan said the bin at Wethersfield Glass does 

have a permit. He will have to check on the one at Krauser’s. Commissioner Vasel said 

he doesn’t recall allowing the bins at Wethersfield Glass to be placed right in front of the 

property. 

F. Route 3 Discussion as brought up by the Mariners of 58 Farms Village Road 

Ms. Krista Mariner said she didn’t intend this to be an agenda item. She just wanted to 

make the Commission aware that Sue Moses who is doing the land use analysis for the 

Route 3 study identified 2 parcels east of Route 99, which would have an impact on 

Route 3. Because of these two parcels’ proximity to the proposed Waterfront 

Commercial District she thought the Commissioner’s could amplify the discussion. 

Chairman DiLorenzo said they would need more information about that for the 

Commission to discuss it. 

6. ANY OTHER BUSINESS 

Commissioner Arico said he felt 7-12 regarding materials used for filling was still not 

clear enough. Chairman DiLorenzo said this would be discussed at the public hearing. 

But they would have to ask staff if the wording could be changed after it has been 

scheduled for a public hearing. Vice Chairman Goldberg said they would be allowed to 

make minor changes at the time of the public hearing. 

7. COMMUNICATIONS 

Commissioner Angelo wanted to make sure the two letters from Mr. Zagroba were put 

into the record. Chairman DiLorenzo said anything in the packet is part of the record. 

Commissioner Angelo said there was also a letter received from Mr. Joe Mascaro. 

Chairman DiLorenzo asked that they don’t get correspondence using the script font 

because it is too hard to read.



None. 

8. APPROVE BILLS 

9. ADJOURN 

A MOTION was made by Commissioner Vasel to adjourn. Seconded by 

Commissioner Angelo. All were in favor, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 

Meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Eileen A. Knapp 

Recording Secretary

(Working notes) TOWN OF ROCKY HILL PLANNING AND ZONING ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?