(mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Comparison between the observation and the prediction • Displacement NS EW Vertical Gravity (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr) (μGal( Gal/yr) Observation Mean 0.1 (0.4) -1.8 (0.4) 5.2 (0.6) -2.5 (0.9) Corrections 1. RSL 0.00 -0.01 0.12 -0.04 2. PDIM SVAL model 0.05 -0.83 2.04 -0.53 3. PGR ANU+ANT4 0.53 -0.71 1.18 -0.33 ARC3+ANT4 1.30 -2.98 1.46 -0.29 ICE-3G 1.16 -2.43 1.88 -0.31 Sum of the corrections ANU+ANT4 0.58 -1.54 3.33 -0.88 ARC3+ANT4 1.35 -3.82 3.61 -0.84 ICE-3G 1.21 -3.26 4.03 -0.86
A geophysical interpretation Assumed melting rate vs Estimated PDIM effect
Page 1 and 2: Application of modern geodetic meas
Page 3 and 4: Following two topicst will be intro
Page 5 and 6: Geodetic observations at Ny-Ålesun
Page 7 and 8: Absolute gravity observations • R
Page 9 and 10: Possible origins that we studied; (
Page 11: Sensitivity test of the PGR rate La
Page 15 and 16: Japan-US joint observation project
Page 17 and 18: Rapid Uplift Rate Observed in South
Page 19 and 20: Summary of the study by Alaskan gro
Page 21 and 22: GPS measurements 100 km after C. F.
Page 23 and 24: Observation and study in this proje
Page 25 and 26: Absolute gravityg measurement in So
Page 27 and 28: Tide Gauge Stations 100 km after C.
Page 29 and 30: Summary / Experiences in Svalbard a
Page 31: Observed displacement rates • NS

(mm/yr) (mm/yr) (mm/yr)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?