24.12.2014 Views

Bishop's qc-folding and wandering domains in Eremenko ... - ICMS

Bishop's qc-folding and wandering domains in Eremenko ... - ICMS

Bishop's qc-folding and wandering domains in Eremenko ... - ICMS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Critically f<strong>in</strong>ite entire transcendental functions<br />

We denote by S(f ) the set of (f<strong>in</strong>ite) s<strong>in</strong>gularities of f −1 (critical<br />

values, asymptotic values <strong>and</strong> limits of those values).<br />

Def<strong>in</strong>ition: We say that f is critically f<strong>in</strong>ite if S(f ) is f<strong>in</strong>ite.<br />

E λ (z) = λexp(z)<br />

Sn λ (z) = λ s<strong>in</strong>(z)<br />

Theorem (Baker 1984): If f (z) =<br />

∫ z<br />

0<br />

P(t)e Q(t) dt, P <strong>and</strong> Q<br />

polynomials, then f has no w<strong>and</strong>er<strong>in</strong>g <strong>doma<strong>in</strong>s</strong>. Indeed this follows<br />

from a more general statement.<br />

Theorem (<strong>Eremenko</strong>-Lyubich, Golberg-Keen 1986): If f is critically<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ite then f has no w<strong>and</strong>er<strong>in</strong>g <strong>doma<strong>in</strong>s</strong>.<br />

Remark: The proofs adapted Sullivan’s quasi-conformal strategy.<br />

W<strong>and</strong>er<strong>in</strong>g <strong>doma<strong>in</strong>s</strong> <strong>and</strong> Bishop’s <strong>fold<strong>in</strong>g</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!