24.12.2014 Views

DREAMS FORECLOSED: The Rampant Theft of Americans' Homes

DREAMS FORECLOSED: The Rampant Theft of Americans' Homes

DREAMS FORECLOSED: The Rampant Theft of Americans' Homes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>DREAMS</strong> <strong>FORECLOSED</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Rampant</strong> <strong>The</strong>ft <strong>of</strong> Americans’ <strong>Homes</strong> Through Equity-stripping Foreclosure “Rescue” Scams<br />

the couple a few thousand dollars. (Client) would make a monthly payment <strong>of</strong> $1,800 for a<br />

year, and then the loan could be refinanced and more affordable payments would follow. <strong>The</strong><br />

client was under the assumption that the investor would become his new lender and that he<br />

would no longer owe (his original mortgage company).<br />

“<strong>The</strong> day before the sale date <strong>of</strong> his home (client) was asked to go to the law <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong><br />

(attorney) in Newport News, Virginia to sign paperwork to stop the foreclosure <strong>of</strong> his home.<br />

(Client) and his wife never met with an attorney but were given a deed <strong>of</strong> gift to sign, by a<br />

secretary. <strong>The</strong>y signed without fully understanding what a deed <strong>of</strong> gift was. He actually thought<br />

it was a promissory note.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> next day a check for $16,000 was sent to (the original mortgage company). <strong>The</strong><br />

check was made out to the client and his wife and the memo noted that the check was for down<br />

payment assistance and purchase <strong>of</strong> the property. <strong>The</strong> clients stated that they never were given<br />

the check and they never endorsed the check. (Mortgage company) used the check to bring the<br />

mortgage current and assisted the clients with a loan modification to improve their current<br />

interest rate. At this point (client) understood that he still had a mortgage loan with (mortgage<br />

company) and was not sure what (the “rescue” firm) had done.<br />

“It was not until March when the client contacted HOME that he understood the impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> the deed <strong>of</strong> gift. (“Rescue” firm) put a for sale sign in his yard. He contacted (“rescue” firm )<br />

and was told that he had not made any payments on his loan and (“rescue” firm) was going to<br />

sell his property. He was threatened not to take the (for sale) sign out <strong>of</strong> his yard and not to<br />

contact a lawyer. (Client) did not want our agency to contact (“rescue” firm) because he was<br />

scared he would lose his home. We have referred him for legal assistance and are trying to<br />

support him with additional resources.”<br />

HOME’s Paula Sherman adds that this client told her “I’d have never sold my house<br />

for $16,000.” Sherman believes the home is worth about 15 times that amount, or $235,000.<br />

Now, she told NCLC in April, “this guy (from the “rescue” firm) is forcing the sale <strong>of</strong> the<br />

property and threatening my client daily; telling him ‘if any agency contacts me I know judges,<br />

I know lawyers, I know state troopers.’ My client is paralyzed with fear.”<br />

XVlll. WASHINGTON:<br />

"<strong>The</strong> whole thing was set up to fail"<br />

Seattle attorney Melissa Huelsman says she's filed four lawsuits in foreclosure<br />

“rescue” cases and is planning several others.<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!