DREAMS FORECLOSED: The Rampant Theft of Americans' Homes
DREAMS FORECLOSED: The Rampant Theft of Americans' Homes
DREAMS FORECLOSED: The Rampant Theft of Americans' Homes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>DREAMS</strong> <strong>FORECLOSED</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Rampant</strong> <strong>The</strong>ft <strong>of</strong> Americans’ <strong>Homes</strong> Through Equity-stripping Foreclosure “Rescue” Scams<br />
the couple a few thousand dollars. (Client) would make a monthly payment <strong>of</strong> $1,800 for a<br />
year, and then the loan could be refinanced and more affordable payments would follow. <strong>The</strong><br />
client was under the assumption that the investor would become his new lender and that he<br />
would no longer owe (his original mortgage company).<br />
“<strong>The</strong> day before the sale date <strong>of</strong> his home (client) was asked to go to the law <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong><br />
(attorney) in Newport News, Virginia to sign paperwork to stop the foreclosure <strong>of</strong> his home.<br />
(Client) and his wife never met with an attorney but were given a deed <strong>of</strong> gift to sign, by a<br />
secretary. <strong>The</strong>y signed without fully understanding what a deed <strong>of</strong> gift was. He actually thought<br />
it was a promissory note.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> next day a check for $16,000 was sent to (the original mortgage company). <strong>The</strong><br />
check was made out to the client and his wife and the memo noted that the check was for down<br />
payment assistance and purchase <strong>of</strong> the property. <strong>The</strong> clients stated that they never were given<br />
the check and they never endorsed the check. (Mortgage company) used the check to bring the<br />
mortgage current and assisted the clients with a loan modification to improve their current<br />
interest rate. At this point (client) understood that he still had a mortgage loan with (mortgage<br />
company) and was not sure what (the “rescue” firm) had done.<br />
“It was not until March when the client contacted HOME that he understood the impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> the deed <strong>of</strong> gift. (“Rescue” firm) put a for sale sign in his yard. He contacted (“rescue” firm )<br />
and was told that he had not made any payments on his loan and (“rescue” firm) was going to<br />
sell his property. He was threatened not to take the (for sale) sign out <strong>of</strong> his yard and not to<br />
contact a lawyer. (Client) did not want our agency to contact (“rescue” firm) because he was<br />
scared he would lose his home. We have referred him for legal assistance and are trying to<br />
support him with additional resources.”<br />
HOME’s Paula Sherman adds that this client told her “I’d have never sold my house<br />
for $16,000.” Sherman believes the home is worth about 15 times that amount, or $235,000.<br />
Now, she told NCLC in April, “this guy (from the “rescue” firm) is forcing the sale <strong>of</strong> the<br />
property and threatening my client daily; telling him ‘if any agency contacts me I know judges,<br />
I know lawyers, I know state troopers.’ My client is paralyzed with fear.”<br />
XVlll. WASHINGTON:<br />
"<strong>The</strong> whole thing was set up to fail"<br />
Seattle attorney Melissa Huelsman says she's filed four lawsuits in foreclosure<br />
“rescue” cases and is planning several others.<br />
39