25.12.2014 Views

Abstract Booklet 2006 - Swanson School of Engineering - University ...

Abstract Booklet 2006 - Swanson School of Engineering - University ...

Abstract Booklet 2006 - Swanson School of Engineering - University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The U.S. pioneered development <strong>of</strong> supercritical technology with the first boiler<br />

commencing commercial operation in 1957. This 125-MW B&W Universal Pressure<br />

boiler located at Ohio Power Company's Philo plant delivered 675,000 lb/h steam at<br />

4,550 psi. The steam was superheated to 1150°F with two reheats to 1050 and 1000°F.<br />

Also installed in the U.S. are 9 x 1300-MW units, the largest single supercritical units<br />

designed, including one that set a record for 607 continuous days <strong>of</strong> operation.<br />

B&W are an actively involved in the US-DOE s ultra supercritical boiler materials<br />

research program testing stronger more corrosion-resistant materials, such as highnickel<br />

alloys, necessary to progress to steam temperatures as high as 1400°F. Such<br />

progression is essential to preserving pulverized coal technology as the preferred<br />

choice for power generation. Applying these new materials will increase generating<br />

efficiency beyond that currently possible with ferritic steels and, by producing less<br />

carbon dioxide, new units will have lower the costs for carbon capture and<br />

sequestration.<br />

This paper will present results from the test programs to certify the new materials.<br />

Fire-side and steam-side corrosion data have been collected from a test loop in an<br />

operating boiler as well as from laboratory simulations, and material weldability and<br />

fabrication have been evaluated. The paper will also discuss how the materials under<br />

development will be incorporated into the design <strong>of</strong> new, more efficient boilers.<br />

3-5<br />

Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture from Pulverized Coal Plants<br />

John Wheeldon, Electric Power Research Institute; USA<br />

In response to concerns over global warming, technologies need to be developed that capture<br />

and store the CO 2 released by fossil-fueled power plants. A study carried out in 2000 and c<strong>of</strong>unded<br />

by the US-DOE and EPRI investigated the thermal and economic performance <strong>of</strong><br />

supercritical pulverized coal (PC) combustion and an E-Gas integrated gasification<br />

combined cycle (IGCC), using bituminous coal both with and without CO 2 removal. The<br />

general conclusion was that for power plants with CO 2 capture, the technology with the<br />

lowest cost <strong>of</strong> electricity was IGCC with pre-combustion capture. An implied conclusion<br />

was that supercritical PC with post-combustion capture was not an economic or efficient<br />

way to proceed.<br />

Since the publication <strong>of</strong> that study, several improvements have been identified that enhance<br />

the thermal and economic performance <strong>of</strong> post-combustion CO 2 capture technology.<br />

Improvements include those to solvents, CO 2 capture plant equipment design, and<br />

integration <strong>of</strong> the CO 2 capture plant with the power plant to improve heat utilization. Once<br />

these improvements are incorporated into the DOE/EPRI study, it is shown that a PC plant<br />

using post-combustion capture can be competitive with IGCC using pre-combustion capture.<br />

This is especially the case for sub-bituminous coal where post-combustion capture may be<br />

the most economic choice. The latest study also shows a benefit in going to ultrasupercritical<br />

steam conditions. The higher efficiency <strong>of</strong> these PC plants lowers the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

CO 2 produced and so lowers the cost <strong>of</strong> CO 2 capture. This information justifies continued<br />

effort to develop materials for use with steam cycles operating at higher temperatures and<br />

pressures. Significant benefits are also gained from improvements to CO 2 capture solvents<br />

and equipment design, so both these measures also warrant continued development effort.<br />

The paper reports on the improvements identified for PC plants incorporating postcombustion<br />

CO 2 capture and discusses improvements that may be made in the future.<br />

SESSION 4<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES:<br />

MERCURY ABSORPTION – 1<br />

4-1<br />

Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Sulphur-Impregnated Activated Carbons Produced Using<br />

Different Impregnation Methods in Mercury Vapour Adsorption<br />

Laura Fuentes de Maria, Shitang Tong, Donald W. Kirk, Charles Q. Jia, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Toronto, CANADA<br />

Adsorption technologies based on sulphur-impregnated activated carbons (SIACs) have<br />

been proven an efficient method for vapour-phase mercury removal at coal-fired power<br />

plants. The enhanced adsorption capacity <strong>of</strong> SIACs is <strong>of</strong>ten attributed to its high specific<br />

surface area and sulphur species. The effect <strong>of</strong> sulphur-impregnation methods, which can<br />

result in different sulphur species in SIACs, on mercury adsorption, is however not well<br />

understood. The present study evaluates the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> several SIACs produced from<br />

petroleum coke using different activation methods in the adsorption <strong>of</strong> vapour-phase<br />

elemental mercury. To analyze the effect <strong>of</strong> different sulphur species on the adsorption <strong>of</strong><br />

mercury, four types <strong>of</strong> activated carbons are used, a commercially available sulphur-free<br />

activated carbon (VAC), a commercially available SIAC (BARRICK), and two adsorbents<br />

(FC1 and FC2) produced in our laboratory using oil-sands fluid coke as raw material. The<br />

mercury adsorption experiments are conducted using a laboratory scaled fixed-bed quartz<br />

reactor. A permeation device is used as the source <strong>of</strong> mercury vapour. Concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />

mercury vapour are analyzed based on the dual gold amalgamation technique using a Cold<br />

Vapour Atomic Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (CVAFS). The adsorption capacity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

carbons is determined by analyzing mercury concentrations before and after adsorption. The<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> the temperature is studied in this work to better understand mercury adsorption<br />

mechanisms by SIACs.<br />

3<br />

4-2<br />

A Novel Process for On-site Production <strong>of</strong> Mercury Sorbents<br />

Lawrence Bool, Chien-Chung Chao, David R. Thompson, Praxair, USA<br />

Activated carbon injection (ACI) represents a promising method reduce mercury<br />

emissions from coal-fired plants. In recent years Praxair has developed a flexible<br />

process to produce powder activated carbon (PAC) on-site using the plant’s pulverized<br />

coal. The process is very flexible, allowing both undoped and doped carbons to be<br />

easily produced from the same plant. Third party test results from slipstream tests at<br />

We Energies’ Pleasant Prairie Plant and Xcel Energy’s Comanche Station have shown<br />

removals <strong>of</strong> 90% or greater. Praxair has continued to refine the process to better<br />

understand the process conditions leading to good mercury capture while minimizing<br />

the PAC cost. Several parameters have been explored in detail and will be discussed.<br />

These parameters include the effect <strong>of</strong> dopant concentration on mercury capture, the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> different parent coals on sorbent performance, and the effect <strong>of</strong> a two-step<br />

activation process. Additional work planned in cooperation with the U.S. DOE to<br />

mitigate the impact <strong>of</strong> PAC produced with the Praxair process on concrete properties<br />

will also be discussed.<br />

4-3<br />

Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Activated Char Production for Mercury<br />

Capture from Chicken Waste and Coal<br />

Wei-Ping Pan, Hong Cui, Yan Cao, Institute for Combustion Science and<br />

Environmental Technology, Western Kentucky <strong>University</strong>, USA<br />

Chicken waste (CW) and its blending samples with a selected high sulfur coal (E-coal)<br />

were used as raw materials for activated char (AC) preparation. Raw samples were<br />

subjected to the preparation procedures <strong>of</strong> carbonization in a nitrogen atmosphere and<br />

activation in a steam atmosphere. The basic properties <strong>of</strong> the raw materials, char and<br />

activated char were analyzed by components analysis, surface porosity and TGA<br />

analysis. One AC sample was selected for elemental mercury capture tests in a labscale<br />

drop tube reactor with air flow. The results show that low-cost and effective<br />

activated carbon could be produced by co-process <strong>of</strong> chicken waste and coal with<br />

benefits to increase char yields. The higher removal efficiency is assumed that some<br />

activated species <strong>of</strong> chlorine and sulfur contained in the activated carbon can be <strong>of</strong><br />

benefit to elemental mercury capture. However, the assumed capture mechanism<br />

should be proved by the further investigation <strong>of</strong> detailed surface characteristics.<br />

4-4<br />

Characterization Mercury Transport and Deposition in Ohio River Valley Region<br />

Myoungwoo Kim, Kevin Crist, Ohio <strong>University</strong>, USA<br />

Rao Kotamarthi, Argonne National Laboratory, USA<br />

Ohio <strong>University</strong>, in collaboration with Argonne National Laboratory, CONSOL Energy,<br />

Advanced Technology Systems, Inc (ATS) as subcontractors, is evaluating the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

emissions from coal-fired power plants in the Ohio River Valley region as they relate to the<br />

transport and deposition <strong>of</strong> mercury, arsenic, and associated fine particulate matter. This<br />

evaluation involves two interrelated areas <strong>of</strong> effort: ambient air monitoring and regionalscale<br />

modeling analysis. The scope <strong>of</strong> work for the modeling analysis includes (1)<br />

development <strong>of</strong> updated inventories <strong>of</strong> mercury and arsenic emissions from coal plants and<br />

other important sources in the modeled domain; (2) adapting an existing 3-D atmospheric<br />

chemical transport model to incorporate recent advancements in the understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

mercury transformations in the atmosphere; (3) analyses <strong>of</strong> the flux <strong>of</strong> Hg 0 , RGM, arsenic,<br />

and fine particulate matter in the different sectors <strong>of</strong> the study region to identify key transport<br />

mechanisms; (4) comparison <strong>of</strong> cross correlations between species from the model results to<br />

observations in order to evaluate characteristics <strong>of</strong> specific air masses associated with longrange<br />

transport from a specified source region; and (5) evaluation <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> these<br />

correlations to emissions from regions along the transport path. This will be accomplished by<br />

multiple model runs with emissions simulations switched on and <strong>of</strong>f from the various source<br />

regions. The modeling analysis is currently on-going. However an analysis <strong>of</strong> the base case<br />

runs will be presented including mercury wet-deposition patterns for the Ohio River Valley.<br />

4-5<br />

Field Evaluations <strong>of</strong> Carbon Sorbents<br />

Nicholas R. Pollack, Calgon Carbon Corporate, USA<br />

Calgon Carbon Corporation has investigated a series <strong>of</strong> carbon sorbents for the<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> mercury from flue gas streams <strong>of</strong> coal-fired power plants. Pilot studies<br />

were conducted at a commercial power plant together with Apogee Scientific, Inc. The<br />

results represent the performance <strong>of</strong> the sorbents under real conditions using an actual<br />

flue gas stream. A number <strong>of</strong> parameters were studied: carbon substrate, particle size,<br />

impregnants, pore volume, and surface modifications. A follow-up study was<br />

conducted with the most promising candidates in order to maximize the performance<br />

and minimize the cost <strong>of</strong> the sorbent. Greater than 90% mercury removal was achieved<br />

with the best sorbents at normal injection rates. Calgon Carbon Corporation will<br />

present the results <strong>of</strong> these studies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!