Evaluation of two baling systems for harvesting biomass on the ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3. Results 3.1. System per<strong>for</strong>mance Site 1 and Site 2 Bio-baler & MT565B Claas baler & MT545B Site 1 2 1 2 Time per bale (min) 15.30 13.50 6.20 6.84 Bales per hour 3.92 4.44 9.68 8.78 Acres/h 1.03 0.73 1.77 1.27 Green tons per productive hour 2.22 2.62 6.69 5.52 Green tons per acre 2.15 3.59 3.77 4.35 Fraction <strong>of</strong> understory harvested 0.29 0.43 0.51 0.52
3. Results 3.1. System per<strong>for</strong>mance SK 140 SK 300 Site 1 2 1 2 Acres/h 0.74 1.08 * 0.89 * SK 300 mulcher was not evaluated on Site 1. Site 1 and Site 2
Page 1 and 2: 31 st Annual Council on Forest Engi
Page 3 and 4: 1. Introduction This study was deve
Page 5 and 6: 2. Materials & Methods 2.1. Area 3
Page 7 and 8: 2. Materials & Methods 98% Pine Sit
Page 9 and 10: 2. Materials & Methods 15% 10% 74%
Page 11 and 12: 2. Materials & Methods 2.2. Systems
Page 13 and 14: 2. Materials & Methods 2.2. Systems
Page 15 and 16: 2. Materials & Methods 2.3. Data co
Page 17: 3. Results 3.1. System perf
Page 21 and 22: 3. Results 3.1. System perf
Page 23 and 24: 3. Results 3.2. Fuel consumption Si
Page 25 and 26: 3. Results 3.4. Costs and benefits
Page 27 and 28: 3. Results 3.4. Costs and benefits
Page 29 and 30: 4. Conclusion Bio-baler system has

Evaluation of two baling systems for harvesting biomass on the ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?