Evaluation of two baling systems for harvesting biomass on the ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3. Results 3.1. System per<strong>for</strong>mance Site 3 – Block 2 Claas baler & MT545B * No. <strong>of</strong> passes (SK 140) 1 2 Time per bale (min) 25.8 11.4 Bales per hour 2.3 5.3 Acres/h 0.37 0.79 Green tons per productive hour 1.61 4.19 Green tons per acre 4.32 5.31 Fraction <strong>of</strong> understory harvested 0.19 0.23 * The Bio-baler did not attempt to work on Site 3.
3. Results 3.1. System per<strong>for</strong>mance Site 3 SK 140 on Block 2 SK 300 on Block 1 No. <strong>of</strong> passes 1 2 1 2 Acres/h 0.69 0.41 0.82 * * SK 300 mulcher was not evaluated making <strong>two</strong> passes.
Page 1 and 2: 31 st Annual Council on Forest Engi
Page 3 and 4: 1. Introduction This study was deve
Page 5 and 6: 2. Materials & Methods 2.1. Area 3
Page 7 and 8: 2. Materials & Methods 98% Pine Sit
Page 9 and 10: 2. Materials & Methods 15% 10% 74%
Page 11 and 12: 2. Materials & Methods 2.2. Systems
Page 13 and 14: 2. Materials & Methods 2.2. Systems
Page 15 and 16: 2. Materials & Methods 2.3. Data co
Page 17 and 18: 3. Results 3.1. System perf
Page 19: 3. Results 3.1. System perf
Page 23 and 24: 3. Results 3.2. Fuel consumption Si
Page 25 and 26: 3. Results 3.4. Costs and benefits
Page 27 and 28: 3. Results 3.4. Costs and benefits
Page 29 and 30: 4. Conclusion Bio-baler system has

Evaluation of two baling systems for harvesting biomass on the ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?