- Page 1 and 2: Quantitative Local Analysis of Nonl
- Page 3 and 4: Quantitative Local Analysis of Nonl
- Page 5 and 6: technique is adapted both to region
- Page 7 and 8: Contents Contents ii List of Figure
- Page 9 and 10: 5.1 Setup and Estimation of the Rob
- Page 11 and 12: 4.1 Invariant subsets of ROA report
- Page 13 and 14: 6.4 Upper bounds for ∂(V ) = 2 (w
- Page 15: 4.4 Optimal values of β in the pro
- Page 19 and 20: specifically sum-of-squares program
- Page 21 and 22: ections. Finally, it is shown that,
- Page 23 and 24: 1.2 Summary of Examples Listed belo
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2 Background The goal in th
- Page 27 and 28: Affine SDPs are convex optimization
- Page 29 and 30: and LP constraints, namely for c
- Page 31 and 32: Theorem 2.2.1. A polynomial p, in x
- Page 33 and 34: containment constraint {x ∈ R n :
- Page 35 and 36: ⊳ Example 2.3.1. We now give a pr
- Page 37 and 38: The main difference between these c
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3 Simulation-Aided Region-o
- Page 41 and 42: of decision variable space, so that
- Page 43 and 44: Using simple generalizations of the
- Page 45 and 46: where ∇V (c(t))f(c(t)) < 0, l 1 (
- Page 47 and 48: It is well-known that Y lin is conv
- Page 49 and 50: Φ T 3 α = b 3 Φ T 2 α = b 2 α
- Page 51 and 52: definite l 2 ∈ R[x], define γ
- Page 53 and 54: Table 3.1. Parameters used in and r
- Page 55 and 56: 3 2 1 0 −1 −2 −3 −2 −1 0
- Page 57 and 58: Table 3.2. Volume ratios for (E 1 )
- Page 59 and 60: 3.3.3 Controlled Short Period Aircr
- Page 61 and 62: 1.5 1 0.5 x 3 0 −0.5 −1 −1.5
- Page 63 and 64: sampling some region and imposing
- Page 65 and 66: vi. Further optimize initializing C
- Page 67 and 68:
where H can be chosen positive defi
- Page 69 and 70:
3.6 Appendix Problems 3.2.1 and 3.2
- Page 71 and 72:
and p be convex. Define β ∗ a :=
- Page 73 and 74:
SOS relaxations [63, 58, 59, 57, 73
- Page 75 and 76:
Note that entries of ϕ do not have
- Page 77 and 78:
introduces extra complexity [35] an
- Page 79 and 80:
δ(= ϕ + α) as long as ϕ l (x)
- Page 81 and 82:
and V (0) = 0 are sufficient condit
- Page 83 and 84:
• For each δ ∈ E ∆ , compute
- Page 85 and 86:
The result is straightforward to ex
- Page 87 and 88:
1.5 1 0.5 x 2 0 −0.5 −1 −1.5
- Page 89 and 90:
3 2 1 x 2 0 −1 −2 −3 −2 −
- Page 91 and 92:
Table 4.5. Optimal value of β in t
- Page 93 and 94:
4.7 Appendix Parameters for the unc
- Page 95 and 96:
eter space) and covering the graph
- Page 97 and 98:
functions, and δ takes values in a
- Page 99 and 100:
(SDP), with 3 “types” of decisi
- Page 101 and 102:
5.2 Polynomial Parametric Uncertain
- Page 103 and 104:
and max σ li ∈S li ,a l ,b l Vol
- Page 105 and 106:
5.3 Branch-and-Bound Type Refinemen
- Page 107 and 108:
- compute L D k and update U D k;
- Page 109 and 110:
Finally, the following continuity r
- Page 111 and 112:
1 β lp β nc β 0.5 0 1 lower boun
- Page 113 and 114:
15 β10 "quasi−upper" and lower b
- Page 115 and 116:
5.5 Chapter Summary We extended the
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 6 Reachability and Local Ga
- Page 119 and 120:
then G R 2 ⊆ Ω V,R 2. ⊳ Given
- Page 121 and 122:
where V poly and S’s are prescrib
- Page 123 and 124:
Lower bound for the reachable set:
- Page 125 and 126:
Consequently, this strengthens the
- Page 127 and 128:
Of course, this set could be empty,
- Page 129 and 130:
ii. If all trajectories stay in Ω
- Page 131 and 132:
Given K current , solve: [1/R∗, 2
- Page 133 and 134:
20 15 β 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 R 2 Fi
- Page 135 and 136:
5 4 γ 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 R Figure
- Page 137 and 138:
Proof. Let ẋ 2 (t) = Ax 2 (t) + B
- Page 139 and 140:
Proof. Define S := V + Q. d dt S(x
- Page 141 and 142:
✲ ẋ 4 = A c x 4 + B c y v = C c
- Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 7 Conclusions This thesis i
- Page 145 and 146:
ehavior of the actual system. The i
- Page 147 and 148:
[8] H. H. Bauschke and J. M. Borwei
- Page 149 and 150:
editors, System Theory: Modeling, A
- Page 151 and 152:
[45] A. Paice and F. Wirth. Robustn
- Page 153 and 154:
[64] J. E. Tierno, R. M. Murray, J.